The URL can be used to link to this page

1991-06-04\ � . � .� � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA � June 4, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of the May 21st Council Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the May 28th Planning Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgment of the May Building Report. c. Acknowledgment of Donation from U.S. West. d. Acknowledgment of Donation from the VFW. e. Approval of Lightning Protection for Mendakota Park Buildings. f. Approval of Request for Leave of Absence. g. Approval of Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a deck to within 73.5 feet of the Wetlands for Mr. Gary Hagstrom - CASE NO. 91-14. h. Approval of a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a deck to within 75 feet of the Wetlands for Mr. John Gregoire - CASE NO. 91-13. i. Approval of a Wetlands Permit to allow construction�•of a fence to within 33 feet of the Wetlands for Mr. Duane Skar - CASE NO. 91-16. j. Adoption of RESOLIITION NO. 91-27, RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING RESPONSE. k. Approval of the List of Contractors. l. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar 6. Pub1iC Comments * a. Update on McQuay Complaint - 976 Kay Avenue. 7. Hearinas a. Liquor License Renewals - 8:00 P.M. , - Mendakota Country Club and Somerset Country Club - '"` Club Liquor Licenses � • �� 8. � � - Marriott Courtyard - On-Sale Limited Service Hotel and Motel License and Special Sunday Liquor License. - LAMA Corporation (MGM Liquor) - Off-Sale Liquor License. b. St. Peter's Church Utility - RESOLIITION NO. 91-28 - 8:00 P.M. - c. CASE NO. 91-09: HNTB (MAC) - CUP for Essential Service - 8:00 P.M. - Structure (Air Noise Monitors) IInfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 91-15: Marvin Anderson Construction - Wetlands Permit b. CASE NO. 91-12: Bruber - Wetlands Permit c. CASE NO. 90-35: Duggan - Wetlands Permit dt Update on Soccer Field Availability Issue. e. Accept Resignation of Assistant Fire Chief and Discuss Replacement Process. f. Discussion on Southeast Area Land Use Study. g. Discussion on Proposed Cat Ordinance. h. Discussion on Zoning Ordinance Recodification. 10. Council Comments 11. Adjourn � � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO J � June 4, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for June 4th Council Meeting Additional information is being submitted for three items already scheduled on the agenda, items 6a., 8c. and 8d. (*). Please note that Council is to adjourn to a Closed Session to discuss litigation matters - Centex Real Estate Corporation. 3. Aqenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the agenda printed on pink paper. 6a. Public Comments - IIpdate on McQuay Complaint See attached letter from Mr. McQuay 8c. CASE NO. 90-35: Dugqan - Aetlands Permit See attached memo. 8d. update on soccer Field Availability Issue See attached letter from Mr. Keith Campbell, representative ' of the Sibley Sting Program and Coaches. 11. �Adjourn Adjourn to Closed Session to Discuss Litigation Matters - Centex Real Estate Corporation. MTL:kkb �, Page No. 3003 May 21, 1991 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY � STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, May 21, 1991 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 8:00 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. . The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers ` Blesener, Cummins, Koch and Smith. AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. ` Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the May 7, 1991 regular meeting with correction. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Smith moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the May 14, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly report for March. c. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department monthly report for April. d. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly report for April. e. Authorization for the issuance of a purchase�order to Action Enterprises, l Inc., for tennis court resurfacing and repairs, for their low quote of $7,100. Page No. 3004 May 21, 1991 f. Award of the contract for 1991 seal coating to Struck & Irwin Paving, Inc., for their low bid of $27,870. g. Acknowledgment of a letter from Mr. & Mrs. E. Eilers, 741 Decorah Lane, requesting the improvement of Decorah Lane, along with an associated report and recommendation from Public Works Director Danielson. h. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated May 21, 1991 and attached hereto. i. Approval of the list of claims dated and totalling $306,672.14. j. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-2�, "RESOLUTION URGING THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION IN THE FEDERAL ,AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TO IMI�fEDIATELY IMPLEMENT THE BLUE RIBBON CORRIDOR TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION." Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC CONIlKENTS Mr. Virgil McQuay complained about motorcycles on City pedways and asked that signs stating rules for use be placed on the pedways. Staff was directed to prepare a press release regarcling the restriction on motorized vehicles on pedways and explore the possibility of signage. SOCCER FIELD REQUEST Mr. McQuay also complained about maintenance of the grass areas along the pedways and branches and trees which have not been removed by the City on the property near Royal Redeemer Church. He further stated that he wants to file a claim with the City for replacement of some of his trees and flooding on his property. Mayor Mertensotto informed Mr. McQuay that he should submit a written claim and the City will respond to it. Mr. Keith Campbell and several Sibley Sting soccer coaches were present to discuss their concern that�there are no existing soccer fields for children over 12 years old, and the Mendakota Park plan does not include soccer fields . Y ! �,� � �� Page No. 3005 May 21, 1991 Mr. John Bruder informed Council that the Sibley Sting travelling soccer program was started last year and that there are about 150 participants in the program, with 225 anticipated in 1992. He stated that the Sting can't represent the community well unless it has good fields to play on, but there is not a single dedicated soccer field in the City and no place to practice in the summer. He asked that Council reconsider the design for Mendakota to include a full-size soccer field rather than the proposed 40 by 80 yard field. r Councilmember Blesener stated that there are ' four baseball/softball fields planned for � Mendakota and open space that was defined for soccer. The Citizens Park Review Committee did research on needs but there was`a very strong lobby for youth baseball and for softball but very little lobbying for soccer. She felt that it is very timely that the soccer group come before Council now. She stated that the Mendakota Park softball fields were designed as a group of four to provide for growth in league play and felt that two of the fields could be used for soccer. The soccer field could be relocated when the City has its third park site and then softball can return to the interim soccer area at Mendakota Park. Mayor Mertensotto asked what would happen to the Mendakota Park project contract currently under way. Councilmember Blesener stated that change orders can be made to the contract. Park Project Manager Guy Kullander stated that the mass grading of the Mendakota fields has been completed and the black dirt has been spread. The dirt would have to be removed and the area would need to be re-graded and drainage would have to be changed so that the area drains properly for soccer. He anticipated the cost would be between $10,000 and $20,000 and the change would eliminate one softball field. Mr. Kullander was directed to review the possibility and report back to Council on June 4th. Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would be willing to call a special meeting if necessary so that the contractor does not get Page No. 3006 May 21, 1991 too much work done at the site to allow for change orders. Councilmember Smith stated that Council would want to be sure that grading done for soccer would accommodate a softball field and sprinkler system in the future. Councilmember Cummins asked where the Sibley soccer field is. Mr. Campbell responded that there are two soccer fields below the high school, one for girls and one for boys' varsity, but the fields are currently used as the softball outfield. r , Councilmember Blesener stated that she would like Council to indicate a preference to accommodate the need for a full-sized soccer field at the Mendakota Park complex� Mayor Mertensotto responded that the idea is good but that the City has a contract for Mendakota Park which would be subject to a major change and that Council should first know what the impact of the change would be. Councilmember Cummins asked Mr. Campbell if it would be more valuable if two full-sized fields were constructed in the Kensington Park. Mr. Campbell responded that the need for two fields will depend on how well the . program does, but that one field is needed now - the soccer group is looking for something for next year. Mr. Kullander suggested that the School District could transfer softball to the Sibley Park complex in June and the Sting could perhaps use the Sibley soccer fields. Mr. Mike Kluznik stated that he served on the 25 member citizen committee and would like to commend Councilmembers Cummins and Blesener for speaking on behalf of soccer needs. He stated that he spent many hours on the soccer sub-committee and it went nowhere. He stated that the referendum package put together two years ago included an excellent program for soccer and that he was demoralized last year when he realized that with the Kensington problems soccer would go nowhere. He informed Council that the Sibley Sting has an excellent program and players and came in second in the � Page No. 3007 May 21, 1991 state even though they had to scramble for fields. It was the consensus that Councilmember Blesener, Parks Commission Chair Huber and Parks Project Manager Kullander meet to discuss the matter and report back to Council. SOUTHEAST AREA REPORT City Planner Tim Malloy reviewed his interim report on the southeast area scoping study and responded to Council questions. Mayor Mertensotto was excused at 9:00. Mr. Bob Byers, from SEH, reviewed traffic ,� information. Acting Mayor Blesener asked that the consultant compile a matrix of traf�ic numbers in the 1985 Southeast Area study as they compare to the information in the current report. MENDAKOTA PARK BIDS Council acknowledged a memo from Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander regarding quotes received for Mendakota Park play equipment and recommendations that a drinking fountain be installed in the park for a cost not to exceed $2,500 and that a three compartment stainless steel sink be installed in the concession building at a cost not to exceed $1,000. . Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Mr. Kullander reviewed drawings of play equipment proposed for the park and recommending that the play equipment bid be awarded to Earl F. Anderson Company, for $70,000, and that additional play equipment components, totaling $5,186, be added to the Anderson design proposal. Councilmember Smith moved to direct staff to prepare a change order to direct the plumbing contractor for the Mendakota Park buildings to delete the single compartment NFS sink and install a three compartment NFS approved sink in the Mendakota Park concession building at a cost not to exceed $1,000 and to authorize installation of a drinking fountain for a cost not to exceed $2,500. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved to award the contract for Mendakota Park play equipment, � Page No. 3008 May 21, 1991 including the additional components recommended by the Park Project Manager, to Earl F. Anderson Company for a total cost of $75,186.00. ' Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 HEARING - ST. PETER'S Council acknowledged a memo from the Public CHURCH UTILITIES Works Director recommending that the hearing on the proposed extension of public utilities to St. Peter's Church and adjacent areas be continued to June 4th. Councilmember Smith moved that hearing be continued to June 4, Councilmember Koch seconded the Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 the feasibility 1991. motion. < CABLE TELEVISION Council acknowledged a report from Administrator Lawell regarding a proposed amendment to the Cable Television franchise ordinance with respect to narrow-casting and potential NDC-4 construction of a combined community television studio/administrative office facility. NDC-4 Chair Ken Henderson gave Council a history of the Commission. He informed Council that he and other representatives of . NDC-4 are present to review a requested amendment to the cable franchise ordinance with respect to narrow-casting. Ms. Holly Hanson, NDC-4 Executive Director, informed Council that Continental Cablevision has indicated that they will trade channels so that government access channels can be next to each other. The channel provisions will not be part of the ordinance since the NDC-4 cannot require it under the franchise, but there will be a side agreement. Councilmember Cummins asked what the cities are foregoing in their abilities to use narrow casting in the future if they now agree to two adjacent channels. Ms. Hanson responded that all of the cities could cablecast live on the same channel (to their own communities) at the same time if narrowcasting were available. That is not possible without narrowcasting. She pointed out that NDC-4 has not permanently signed off on narrow-casting - the letter of agreement provides that Continental or its � . 1 Page No. 3009 May 21, 1991 successor may be required to provide narrowcasting capability in the event of sale. by Continental, reconstruction or contract renewal. NDC-4 legal representative Mike Sokol reviewed the provisions of the proposed ordinance amendment for Council. He stated that at least five of the seven communities in NDC-4 must adopt the ordinance. Acting Mayor Blesener asked if the $200,000 net gain is proposed to be applied to construction of a new facility. Mr. Henderson responded that at the beginning of the f� negotiations with Continental, the NDC-4 agreed it would not discuss the disposition of any settlement until the agreement is signed, so use of the settlement is an open<issue. Councilmember Smith stated that as the Council's representative on the NDC-4, she would welcome input from Council as to disposition of the settlement. It was pointed' out that the franchise ordinance amendment must be published before it can become effective. Mr. Ron Rogosheske, the Mendota Heights citizen representative on NDC-4 stated that in view of the fact that Continental has made the gesture for using channels 18 and 19 simultaneously for government access plus the good relationship between NDC-4 and Continental and the potential for narrowcasting in the future, he felt that the proposed agreement is very good for the cities. Councilmember Cummins moved to approve the Geographic Narrowcasting Letter of Agreement, subject to withholding publication of the ordinance amendment until action to approve the amendment has been taken by at least five of the seven NDC-4 member cities, and contingent upon written commitment from Continental that Channels 18 and 19 will be the dedicated government access channels. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Ms. Hanson reviewed her letter regarding the Commission's investigation of the possibility � Page No. 3010 May 21, 1991 of combining an NDC-4 community television studio and facilities with its administrative offices. Continental's forgiveness of the repayment of any and all prepaid franchise fees by NDC-4, as is a provision of the proposed letter of agreement, will help the Commission in its budgeting. She stated that the Commission has established a committee to find out which of the member cities would like to have the proposed facility located in their communities. The Commission is looking at all options, including leasing and building. Although the letter to the City speaks to the possibility of inclusion of $500,000 in a city �; bond issue to help NDC-4 finance its facility, the Commission is not specifically interested in bonding. The Commission is however attracted to the possibility because interest rates would likely be lower. " Councilmember Cummins asked what current franchise fees and revenues are. Ms. Hanson responded that the franchise fee is 5�, and revenue in 1990 was $270,000. Treasurer.Shaughnessy informed Council that inclusion of financing for NDC-4 as part of a City bond sale might present legal problems, depending on the type of issue being approved at the time. He stated that he would be willing to work with the Commission to explore their options and help determine what would be best. Mr. Henderson stated that the Commission's financing would have to piggyback on a city issue. What the NDC-4 is asking at this time is whether Mendota Heights would consider such a proposal if the Commission selects a site in the city. Councilmember Cummins stated that the Commission's television studio is in Mendota Heights now and that he would like to keep the door open to keeping the facility here. Acting Mayor Blesener agreed, stating that she thinks the proposal is a good example of potential for cooperation between public and non-profit agencies. Mr. Rogosheske stated that asbesto5 removal in the area of the Sibley High School where the NDC-4 television studio is located is scheduled for June, 1992, and there is �.r Page No. 3011 May 21, 1991 therefore some urgency for the studio to be relocated. CAT CONTROL ORDINANCE Council acknowledged a memo from Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding constituent requests for a cat control ordinance. Discussion on the matter was tabled to June 4th. MENDAKOTA PARK Council acknowledged a memo from Administrative CONCESSIONS Assistant Batchelder regarding the operation of the Mendakota Park concession area. Council also acknowledged a proposal to operate the concession building from Mr. & Mrs. Gene Will. Acting Mayor Blesener stated that although the proposal from the Wills looks good,'�er preference would be to allow various civic groups to come forward with some type of proposal of their own before,considering contracted service. � Councilmember Cummins stated that the Park Commission should be encouraged to look at a full range of options and make a recommendation. Councilmember Cummins moved to refer the matter to the Park and Recreation Commission for further study in accordance with the direction of Council. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ADOPT-A-PARK Administrative Assistant Batchelder reviewed his memo and recommendation regarding the initiation of an Adopt-A-Park program, modeled after the Mn/DOT adopt-a-highway program. Acting Mayor Blesener stated that she feels the program is a wonderful idea but that she is concerned about the tone of the terms and conditions of the proposed agreement form. She pointed out that Girl Scout leaders, as an example, are not empowered to sign such an agreement. Attorney Hart stated that in a Mn/DOT context, volunteers would likely be closer to streets picking up trash, as opposed to community � Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 ZONING ORDINANCE RECODIFICATION Page No. 3012 May 21, 1991 businesses and other organizations cleaning up parks or trail sections. He felt that a hold harmless clause may please the city's insurer but from a practical aspect he did not think it would provide much. Councilmember Smith felt that the program is a good idea and a good opportunity for citizens to get involved in the community. • Councilmember Koch moved to approve the Adopt- A-Park program with revisions in the form with respect to liability and tone. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a report from the City Clerk regarding the status of the Zoning Ordinance recodification project. Councilmember Cummins felt that the list of permitted B-2 uses should remain as they now exist in the Zoning Ordinance since there is no realistic possibility of redevelopment of the Curley site at the present time. He stated that he recognizes that there are two new Council members who have not had much opportunity to review the document but suggested that the ordinance be referred to the Planning Commission for public hearing. Councilmember Smith stated that she would appreciate the opportunity to discuss why some items are in the document and how they affect the city before any action is taken. It was the consensus that Councilmembers Smith and Koch meet with staff to review the ordinance and that action be tabled to June 4th. TARGET ISSUES Council acknowledged a memo from the City Administrator regarding the proposed 1991 City Target Issues list. Councilmember Smith asked that the park referendum target list be expanded,to reflect the need for future acquisition of park land and the need for a tot lot between T.H. 110 and Marie and Dodd and Delaware. She pointed out that Council had discussed the youth facility as it relates to the Sibley Park felt that Council should further discuss where it should be located. � Councilmember target issues Councilmember Councilmember Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 3013 May 21, 1991 Cummins moved adoption of the with the amendments proposed by Smith. Smith seconded the motion. INTERGOVERNMENTAL Council acknowledged a memo from Administrator COOPERATION Lawell regarding a list of potential shared/consolidated service options which was compiled by the Dakota County City/County Managers' group. Administrator Lawell reviewed the areas where cooperation is feasible and perhaps desirable. Those areas are: dispatch services, staff training, benefit design/group insurance, park and recreation activities and public works/snow removal. ` Acting Mayor Blesener pointed out that the list of city Target Issues identifies park and recreation program needs and�stated that she would like to see cooperative efforts on programming pursued. She also stated that staff training should be an on-going need and that the city should always avail itself of training opportunities. Councilmember Cummins felt that there are two other areas of promise - environmental and inspection opportunities. He felt that in longer term there may be a cost savings in doing joint inspection. He stated that he not sure what the city is currently capable doing in the environmental area but that cooperative effort might also provide a savings to the city. Council expressed its support for intergovernmental cooperation and directed staff to nursue the matter further. the is of RESPONSES TO COUNCIL Council acknowledged a report from CONIlKENTS Administrative Assistant Batchelder responding to Council comments about standing water on the Ivy Hills Park basketball court and the low level of the Valley Park ballfield outfield. Acting Mayor Blesener stated that the Valley Park infield drops off abruptly into the outfield and directed that staff look at the Valley Park field again. � Page No. 3014 May 21, 1991 Councilmember Koch asked that staff look into the possibility of installing drain tile to resolve the Ivy Hills basketball court drainage problems. Administrator Lawell stated that the problem this spring has been for two reasons - the city's failure to breach the dike and the poor soils. He agreed that perhaps there may be an engineering solution, such as installing pipe, to resolve the problem. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Koch asked if there is a , possibility of putting a snow fence at the ' City Hall ballfield site. Administrator Lawell responded that staff has asked the Park Commission to look at the issue of trying to extend the backstop in the past. He stated that the issue will again be brought to the Commission and that staff will report back to Council. Councilmember Smith stated that she has received a call from a resident concerned about seeing a boat on a small pond in the southeast area. Administrator Lawell responded that there is an ordinance restriction against the use of motorized watercraft but non-motorized boats are not restricted. Acting Mayor Blesener expressed concern over the need for benches at the elementary school ballfields. She stated that she hopes the school district would not object to city installation of benches and felt that the city should move ahead on the matter. Administrator Lawell stated that he expects to receive a letter from the District soon and will report back at the next Council meeting. Councilmember Cummins asked whether the Mendota School and Somerset School ballfields are included in the city's inventory of neighborhood ballfields. Administrator Lawell responded that the school district schedules the fields for use by Mend-Eagan and others. He informed Council that he has asked the district to provide him with information on how many hours of the day the fields are used for other than school uses to determine whether they are neighborhood ballfields in addition to school property. Page No. 3015 May 21, 1991 Councilmember Cummins felt that the fields are school district property and should be maintained and equipped by the school district and not the city. Acting Mayor Blesener stated that the fields are always counted among the city�s fields. Councilmember Koch stated that she would not be averse to providing some benches in cooperation with the school district but would not be in favor of putting in improvements for the district. She felt that the school � district is responsible for improvements. � Councilmember Cummins stated that he would prefer not to move ahead until Council has a good update on where the city stand� with respect to referendum funds and city needs. Councilmember Cummins asked whether businesses must be licensed to paint house numbers on curbs. Administrator Lawell responded that staff will research whether they must be licensed. He pointed out that there would be a concern if the firm is going door to door selling the service on the basis that it is endorsed/encouraged by the city. D.A.R.,E. Acting Mayor Blesener congratulated the Police Department for its excellent D.A.R.E. program. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Koch moved that the meeting be adjourned to a closed session for discussion of the Pentel litigation. . Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 , Nays: 0 TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:08 o'cloCk P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL May 21, 1991 Masonry License Heinlein, John-Const., Inc. Excavating Licenses Rauchwarter, Inc. Rose Sewer & Water Timmers Excavating Gas Piping License Standard Heating & A/C Co. General Licenses Frattalone, F.M.-Exc. & Grading, Inc. Goetz, Thomas-Construction Hybrid Enterprises, Inc. Miller, Joseph M.-Const., Inc. Pace Roofing & Construction Patio Enclosures, Inc. Sandau Construction Schwieters Construction, Inc. Tickner Construction, Inc. TreHus Builders Trowel Construction Twin City Storm Sash Co. Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co. Heating & Air Conditioning License Standard Heating & A/C Co. SiQn Erecting Licenses Kaufman 5ign Company SignArt Company < � y CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MAY 28, 1991 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, May 28, 1991, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairperson Dwyer called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following Commission members were present: Dwyer, Dreelan, Duggan and Tilsen. Commissioner Krebsbach had notified the Commission that she would be attending the meeting late. Commissioners Koll and Friel were excused. Also � present were Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Planning Consultant Tim Malloy, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF MINUTES tl Commissioner Duggan moved approval of the April 23, 1991, Minutes. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 91-13: GREGOIRE - WETLANDS PERMIT AYE3: 4 NAYS: 0 Mr. John Gregoire, of 2452 Pond Circle East, was present to discuss his request for a Wetlands Permit in order to construct a deck in the rear yard of his home to within seventy-five feet (75') of the Wetlands. Mr. Gregoire explained that the proposed deck will be an open deck and that very little foliage will be removed. Commissioner Duggan questioned the accuracy of the setback measurement.on the site plan. He stated that he wou�d like to see the City staff verify the setback measurements. Chair Dwyer noted that Mr. Gregoire has received signatures of consent from his surrounding neighbors. Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. May 28, 1991 Page 2 Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant the requested Wetlands Permit subject to City staff verification of the setback measurement of seventy-five feet (75'). Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 � CASE NO. 91-14: HAGSTROM - WETLANDS PERMIT � Mr. Gary Hagstrom, of 2249 Pond Circle West, was present to discuss his request for a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a deck 73.5 feet from the Wetlanzls in his rear yard. He explained that the proposed deck will be a two level deck. Chair Dwyer stated that Mr. Hagstrom has received signatures of consent from his surrounding neighbors. Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant the requested Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a deck within 73.5 feet of the Wetlands. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. � AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 CA3E NO. 91-16: SRAR - WETLANDS PERMIT Mr. Duane Skar, of 2491 Pond Circle West, was present to discuss his request for a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a five foot (5') vinyl clad chain link fence which will enclose his rear yard. He explained that the proposed fence will be within thirty-three feet (33') of the Wetlands and will not be located within the scenic easement. He further explained that his rear yard abuts the Hagstrom-King Park and that a fence would help protect his property and children from the public park. He further stated that the visual impact of the fence will be minimal. , . 1 . ". � � May 28, 1991 Page 3 Chair Dwyer stated that Mr. Skar has received signatures of consent from his surrounding neighbors. Commissioner Tilsen stated that he does not like fences and that a fence should not be used to supervise children. He stated that children can climb fences. He questioned if any vegetation will be destroyed. Mr. Skar responded that he realizes that a fence should not be used to supervise children, but that his property does abut a public park and that he feels it would be in his best interest to erect the fence. He stated that no vegetation will be destroyed. F Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant the requested Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a five foot (5') vinyl clad chain link fence within thirty-three feet (33') of the Wetlands. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. 91-15: MARVIN H. ANDERSON CONSTRIIOTION - WETLAND3 PERMIT� Mr. Fred Haas, of Marvin H. Anderson Construction Company was present to discuss their request for Wetlands Permits within the Second Addition of Bridgeview Shores. Mr. Haas explained that when Marv Anderson Construction first submitted preliminary plans for the overall development, they were not aware that the topography was not adjusted to the boundary survey correctly. He stated that when the final plat was completed, the shore lines were measured to the lot corners and it was shown now in a different location. He stated that their request is to now revise the setbacks so that construction of new homes can be accomplished without having to re-submit to the City for variances. Mr. Haas explained that the Commission should not review the requested Wetlands setback adjustment for Lot 9, Block 1, Bridgeview Shores 2nd Addition. He stated that they were able to reconfigure the deck so that it will be � May 28, 1991 Page 4 placed behind the garage of the home and conform to the original Wetlands setback approval. Commissioner Duggan stated that in 1988 and 1989 the land was cleared off. He questioned if surface water runoff is causing the ponds to increase in depth. Mr. Iiaas stated that both ponds are controlled by storm sewer pipes. He stated that the surface water runoff is not as high now as it will be when the houses are built. Commissioner Tilsen briefly stated his concerns regarding the house pad setback proximity to the Wetlands. He ' stated that he would like to see the setbacks not go below a fifty foot (50') Wetlands setback. He asked Mr. Haas if the homes could be designed to accommodate this concern. Mr. Haas stated that he could redesign the homes so that they will be two car garage homes instead of three car garage homes. Chair Dwyer noted that this was not a public hearing. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Haas stated that Marv Anderson Construction and the homeowners in the area want to keep the area as natural as possible. Commissioner Krebsbach arrived at 8:05 o'clock P.M. Mr. Haas commented that the air plane noise has been a real problem and that they have lost a lot of customers due to the noise while they were out reviewing the sites. The Planning Commission further discussed increasing the Wetlands setback on Lot 8 to sixty feet (60'). Mr. Haas stated that there would be no problem. Commissioner Tilsen stated that he would like to see Lot 4 remain at the approved sixty foot (60' ) setback and Mr. Haas stated that would be fine. Chair Dwyer questioned if there will be the use of siltation barriers. Mr. Haas stated that the barriers will be at pond level. Mr. Haas stated that they are very particular and that they will be maintained properly. Commissioner Tilsen moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. BRUBER - WETLAND5 � May 28, 1991 Page 5 Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend that the City Council grant the following Wetlands setback adjustments all in Block 1, Bridgeview Shores 2nd Addition: Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 7 Lot 8 Lot 11 Lot 12 50' 60' 50' 70' 97' 83' (originally (originally (originally (originally (originally (originally approved at 65') approved at 60') approved at 65') approved at 85') approved at 88') approved at 83') Lot 9 will remain at the original approved setback of � 70'. Commissioner 91-12: PERMIT Duggan seconded the motion. Jay Bruber, of 1852 South Lane and Mr. Ross Erickson, Eagan Pool and Spa were present to discuss Mr. Bruber's request for a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a swimming pool within his back yard. Mr. Erickson stated that the permit request is for sixty- seven feet. He further stated that the type of fence will be wrought iron. Mr. Bruber stated that there will be minimal visual impact to his neighbors to the south. He stated that his neighbors to the northwest will not be able to see the fence. Mr. Erickson pointed out that Mr. Bruber has received signatures of consent from his neighbors. In response to a qiiestion from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Erickson stated that the pool depth will be eight feet (8') and that there will be drain piping and rock installed under the pool. Mr. Erickson briefly explained how the pumping system will work. He stated that the pool liner will begin to float to show any imbalance of water from the exterior. Mr. Erickson stated that the fence will be installed around the parameter of the concrete. He further explained that between the existing deck and the concrete will be between 24 to 34 feet (east to west). Mr. Erickson briefly reviewed the drawings as submitted to the Planning Commission. He pointed out the new = • J � � AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 �. May 28, 1991 Page 6 elevations as created when the home was constructed as a walkout home. Mr. Erickson noted that the solid line on the plans represents the new existing grade elevations. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if the Bruber's had planned on constructing a pool at the time of their initial request for a Wetlands Permit. Mr. Bruber responded that they had some ideas but that that would be several years into the future. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that the Bruber's should have addressed their pool location at the time the initial Wetlands Permit was �, approved. She stated that the grading of the walkout did not allow the rest of the lot to be used for the pool thus necessitating the need for another Wetlands Permit. Mr. Bruber noted that he has formed an association to protect the pond and that he has concerns for the Wetlands area. Mr. Erickson submitted a landscape plan for the Commission to review. Commissioner Duggan moved to waive the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a swimming pool within sixty-seven feet (67') of the Wetlands subject to the submission of landscape plans to City staff and City Council. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 1, KREBSBACH HEARING -- CASE NO. 91-09: HNTB - CIIP FOR ES3ENTIAL SERVICE STRUCTIIRE - AIR NOISE MONITORS Mr. Bob Vorpahl and Mr. Eric Johnson, representing the Metropolitan Airports Co7nmission (MAC) were present to discuss their request for a conditional use permit to allow the location of two remote noise monitoring towers in the City of Mendota Heights. Mr. Vorpahl explained that there are,twenty-four sites that have been chosen within communities that surround May 28, 1991 Page 7 the airport. He stated that Mendota Heights has two of these sites. Chair Dwyer pointed out that Mendota Heights currently receives over 60 percent of air noise and inquired why Mendota Heights is only receiving two percent of the noise monitors. Mr. Vorpahl responded that the MAC does have plans to introduce a third tower to Mendota Heights in the future. He stated that the twenty-four sites are for the first phase only. He stated that they have the capability in the future to double that number. � Commissioner Krebsbach questioned why a noise monitor is being placed within the Furlong area when it is known by all how severe the air craft noise is there. She stated that it would be to the City' s benef it to instal�. a noise monitor north of Highway 110. She stated that air craft noise is affecting other neighborhoods in Mendota Heights and not just the Furlong neighborhood. Mr. Vorpahl stated, at this time, the total cost of the noise monitors will be $989,000. He stated that the monitors are considered state of the art equipment. Public Works Director Danielson stated that the City Council approved the two site locations in 1989 and 1990. He stated that the Council felt it would be to the City' s benefit to install the towers in the Furlong neighborhood since the air noise is known to be severe and Mendota Heights noise will be compared to that being generated at the other 22 locations. Administrative Batchelder concurred and further stated that the siting of the noise monitors in these neighborhoods had been reviewed by our noise consultants, Mr. David Braslau and Bob Collette, who had concurred with MAC's proposed locations. Mr. Vorpahl stated that the MAC has taken bids on the different types of systems and that this particular system is the most aesthetically pleasing. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Vorpahl stated that the noise patterns will be automatically relayed via telephone through MAC computers. He stated that the air craft noise has a significant noise pattern and that surrounding noise (i.e. - vehicles, wind, trees, etc) will not interfere with the gathering of data. Mr. Vorpahl submitted pictures of the Larson-Davis "Tilt Down System" currently being used in Salt Lake City. He stated that this system will be used here. He explained that the system is a locked system and that there will be AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 � May 28, 1991 Page 8 very little maintenance needed as long as it is not tampered with. In response to a question from Chair Dwyer, Mr. Vorpahl stated that the tower height will be twenty feet (20') (measured to the top of the microphone). He stated that NSP will not allow them to install the microphone on existing NSP utility poles. Planner Malloy pointed out that at the time he prepared his report, the MAC was unsure of the type of system they � would be using. He stated that the system they have chosen is the most aesthetically pleasing and that landscaping would not be necessary. Chair Dwyer then opened the meeting to the pub�ic. Mr. Berskow, 1305 Furlong Avenue, questioned if guy wires would be used. He further questioned where the tower will be placed at 1307 Furlong Avenue. Mr. Vorpahl stated that guy wires will not be used and that the tower will be installed in the City's right-of-way by the NSP utility pole. Mr. Vorpahl stated that the MAC has been working with NSP for several months with respect to bringing electrical service to the tower. He stated that they will need a heating and cooling system and that meters may not be needed. He stated that NSP has indicated that they will charge a flat rate. He stated that the NSP has copies of site plans showing the locations of each tower. Mr. Vorpahl stated that they will work with City staff and the City Council on the final locations of the towers. Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant a Conditional Use Permit to allow the erection of two noise monitor towers in Mendota Heights. He further moved that the MAC is to work with City staff and the City Council to determine the final location of the noise monitor towers. .. Commissioner Krebsbach offered a friendly amendment stating that the City Council consider adding at third � � . AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 May 28, 1991 Page 9 noise monitor north of Highway 110. Commissioner Duggan accepted the friendly amendment. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the original motion and friendly amendment. Mr. Vorpahl stated that they anticipate the installation ; to take place in early Fall. ` PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS Commissioner Duggan stated that at a recent City Council meeting the issue of inadequate soccer sites within the City of Mendota Heights was discussed amongst Sibley Sting soccer coaches and the City Council. He stated that the soccer community within Mendota Heights is under represented and that he would like to urge the City Council to give more consideration to the soccer community . Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council adopt and implement acquiring more land for soccer fields within Mendota Heights and that they should pursue looking into adding a soccer field at Mendakota Park. Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 VERBAL REVIEW m Public Works Director Danielson provided a verbal review for the planning items at the previous City Council meeting. He also informed the Commission of Council's desire to have more specific recommendations when recommending such items as "landscaping". ADJOIIRNMENT There being no further business, the Planning Commission adjourned its meeting at 9:33 o'clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary MEMO Y Date: 5-28-97 T0: Mayor, City Camcil, and City Administrator ' FROM: Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer SUBJECT: Building Activity Report for May 1991 CURRENT MONTH YEAR TO DATE 91 YEAR TO DATE 99 BUILDING � ( PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected ( No. Valuation Fee Collected � No. Valuation Fee Coltected � � SFD 10 1,575,955.00 13,895.50 � 27 4,247,882.00 37,481.46 � 30 5,051,712.00 43,001.72 ti APT 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 TOWNHOUSE 0 0 0 � 3 278,041.00 3,017.04 � 5 638,665.00 6,023.34 CONDO 8 662,671.00 4,172.03 � 8 662,671.00 4,172.03 � 0 0 0 MISC. 25 343,495.00 4,406.50 � 54 501,344.00 7,646.30 � 79 678,382.00 11,073.23 C/I 7 756,819.00 5,170.33 � 26 8,037,444.00 37,079.03 � 11 374,574.00 3,855.43 -------------------------------------------+------------------------------....--+------------------------------------ Sub Total 50 3,338,940.00 27,644.36 � 178 13,727,382.00 89,345.86 ( 125 6,683,333.00 63,953.72 � � � � TRADE I I PERMITS• ( I � � Plumbing 17 551.00 � 48 1,847.00 � 47 1,880.00 Water 14 70.00 � 41 205.00 � 33 165.00 Sewer 70 175.00 � 25 630.00 � 33 577.50 Heat, AC, � � & Gas 17 904.00 � 30 5,420.50 ( 59 3,628.85 -------------------------------------------+----.....---------------------------+------------------------------------ Sub Total 58 1,700.00 � 144 8,102.50 � 172 6,257.35 � � � � Licensina• � � � � Contractor's � � Licenses 39 975.00 � 310 7,750.00 � 307 7,675.00 -------------------------------------------+---------------....-----------------+----------------------------•------- Total 747 3,338,940.00 30,379.36 � 572 13,727,382.00 105,248.36 � 604 6,683,333.00 77,880.07 NOTE: All fee amo�ts exclude Sac, 41ac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown uill reflect only permit, plan check fee, and valuation amounts. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS May 31, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Acceptance of Donation - U.S. West NewVector . .. , DISCIISSION On May 7, 1991, the City approved an agreement with U.S. West NewVector regarding the installation of Cellular telephone�antennas on the City's water tower. As part of the agreement negotiation process, the City requested and was granted three portable Cellular telephones for use by various City departments. The instruments are to be delivered to City Hall within the coming week. Although not specifically enumerated in the agreement, U.S. West is making the donation to further express their appreciation to the City for welcoming them to the community. Pursuant to State Statute, the City needs to formally accept the donation, and I recommend that a motion be made to do so. ACTION REOIIIRED Council should make a motion formally accepting the donation of three Cellular telephones to the City.from U.S. West NewVector, and should publicly thank them for their generous donation. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO • May 17, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: John P. Maczko, Fire Chief SUBJECT: VFW Post 6690 Donation This memo is to make you aware of another generous donation by the Mendota VFW to our department. The VFW donated $5,000 to the department for the purchase of a cellular telephone for the new Equipment/Command vehicle, a computer scanner to finish out our computer system which will allow us to scan buildings, city maps, etc. into the computer for use in our emergency management � computer system, funding to send one firefighter, Captain Jamie Lerbs, to Texas A& M for training in flammable liquids. Jamie will be instructing a class for all of the members of the depart- ment so all will benefit from his training at one of the �inest fire schools in the country, and funding for a major portion of our Fire Prevention Program that is one of the largest in the state. , This donation again shows the participation and commitment that the VFW Post 669 has to benefiting the communities in'which it belongs to. JPM:dfw CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire or Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-13: Gregoire - Wetlands Permit � DISCUSSION Mr. John Gregoire, of 2452 Pond Circle East, appeared before the Planning Commission at its May meeting to review his requested Wetlands Permit for an open deck. See attached memos and Planning Report. Planning Commissioner Duggan had some questions about the setback as shown on the site plan. Staff has visited the site and confirmed that the site plan is accurate in listing a seventy-five foot (75') setback from the pond. The applicant has submitted the requested signatures of consent from the adjoining neighbors. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to waive the public hearing and to recommend that the City Council approve the requested Wetlands Permit allowing construction of the deck, as proposed, to within seventy-five feet (75') of the pond. ACTION REOIIIRED If the Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion waiving the public hearing and granting a Wetlands Permit allowinq a deck to be constructed to within seventy-five feet (75') of the Wetlands. JED/KLB:kkb � e [ J� "t CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission May 22, 1991 FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistai�(E�� SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-13: Gregoire - Wetlands Permit � DISCII38ION � Mr. John Gregoire, of 2452 Pond Circle East, is requesting a Wetlands Permit in order to construct a deck in the rear yard of his home to within seventy-five feet (75') of the Wetlands. This residence is another one of the houses identified by staff at the last Planning Commission meeting. The home currently has an existing Wetlands Permit of ninety feet (90'). Construction of this deck would require an adjustment of fifteen feet (15') to the existing Wetlands Permit. The applicant has submitted the requested signatures of consent from the adjoining neighbors. ACTION REOIIIRED Consider waiving the public hearing. Review the request and make a recommendation to the City Council on the requested Wetlands Permit. JED/KLB:kkb J � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 28 May 1991 91-13 John A. Gregoire 2452 Pond Circle East Wetlands Permit for deck 1. The applicant owns one of the lots identified at the last Planning Commission meeting as needing a Wetlands Permit for the construction of a deck. The lot was originally granted a permit to allow construction of the home to within 90 feet of the adjacent wetland. At the time this permit was established the City was pursuing a slightly different policy with respect to the regulation of decks within wetlands areas. At that time decks were not considered a structure and, therefore, no permit was required to construct one. In response to growing concern regarding the preservation of wetlands and the habitats that depend on them the City has begun to interpret the definition of a structure more stringently to include decks. A more detailed discussion of this issue can be found in our planning report for case number 91-10, dated April 23, 1991. 2. This particular lot is located in the southeast corner of ' this pond. As a result, few homes would look directly at the proposed deck. Virtually all of the other homes on this pond also have decks and the applicant's immediate neighbors have reviewed the plans for the proposed deck and have consented to its construction. 3. Since no vegetation would be removed to construct the deck and no significant excavation will be done the proposed deck would not violate any of the standards required for the issuance of a Wetlands Permit. John A. Gregoire, Case 91-13 Page 2 4. In this case, the applicants deck will not require the removal of any significant vegetation nor any substantial grading or excavation. These are the principal criteria listed in the Wetlands Ordinance which are applicable to the construction of a deck. We, therefore recommend that the applicant�s request be approved. .� � �� ;� ► � ; � ��j `� � � -�L;'i �! � • _. ° '� 1 i .,�i � � ' i , � , , • �� i ,,` I� I �� . � •`'` \` • � i � _ �- �� ,. ) \'�� ,I .• I ' � / % . .. � . '. • � ��1 . H I G H � A Y � >�. . � �--"-��- � � � '� - -� � -� - = R J �_� _ �` _ L • ; � � ." ,; � i , --� . . . . . . . . . - + r--- , , . ;,-- .r . . . ,� ;�; : i � . - I � i . � ;� ■ � Z.j. . . �,j . . �'\, . �.,1��• . � I h � , . � --L.�� . . . m , • ,' •! • I � � ��. . . . � ■ �� . .� i ' , I � •�• .• I � � • � � Y . \• ._.___, •' I � ' I .- . � � , . I• , .• • � •`• i •,- ' .' • ��` •\ . � � '�' � • • ••:• • �•� � � �• • : �•�!�i'� I • • � `pNiDGEVj�.� N � , i • . ? ; t � ��lr y I . � r � • �• • •� • • � • � H • � S�, •�� • �t. r . •'� t • • �� .. i � I I/ � \ 4 I ' . � ,� � � � � .}t : . . . ' ',� • • � k :;r .. � � ' I ' •� \�' I -' —_ 1 / �, '* � � • •.• �� /.• �` � • • � %�r � • �,,,////� � • � *'9 • .,. • � � • `�J ' . �)\ I I I � ! i � . 1 � � 4 • � � '� S � � �I' � • • � J � % • • . jjj��'''/// a �i/µ, e :.: f,`,. . . � I � I IM�ih N � \1 � I � • • \ • � • .�••w� � j • ` ^ .: l��i ' .. � 1 r�R�� :t� � \I/ . � � �nq f • . � • • J?i � • � � • • � � i �ii�*-/ i i i (df • I • ``,• � 4� �1 . Pu. _� • �O� • � � �t r � • �y� � : �{ . ��+ �� - ' . . V � t (�; �� , ` �:1 ' m • tq* tipf� � . • • � � / 11y1!� __i . _ , I I �+� , � r � , • f! � • • � ��x� _ o-.__ .,..:_ _ ._-.. _-� � ; I I ; :\\ �,.`o' ��•• O • � r�� • • I ` � < i . � •��.I��, •' � • ,-, , /.�l� • •!�/ �' • —1,� 7Dpc /° � �, 'r+" � .^ •� � � r�:i... � j � _ � 3 C ,� • m .b�•.s;isn�nl ' �/' V / '�)_��• •i` %n � • � n. '$ � I ( . I ' J,�Y1 �t�.' COUq �-� O� .+ • y • / �.`.�. • .a�,i' � � t ? • C� • � • � ', � lAlYO ,l' al _ % i . • � � ST � • � � • • • . • Z 1 t � ` . . . - { ro � i _ i . +•^ � .1 r�� /i � .: • � � . . n � / � . � � �.f � �,.� � • � . . . ► �� / � / :� �, , , > ; �-� � � t ',' .��• • �'• . ,� � , . : � ' '�.� � \\ ..t A � � 1 ,3AItl0 , ��M�,�' ; �� • • i • • � • 1 � � • � � • '� � '- i � . . . � . � , ., • . � • / �\ � / � � �� • • • � � �R Y i. � o \ �, '- - --- • - - ' - "1—`- - > �-�\ - - ' I +�oy+r ��r � �. � ` UBEN � \\ �� ' • • � • • •N • - ` -- ---' � � • o � A•f ��III � ,c � 1 ` � ' � � • � `"�/�i Z � � � � .1, ^� 4 � .o . . . . .. . I ^ � H� �� / O �m • � uJ'°��'�I , f 9# �� i ;. ` � • a � � � � � i I � I � �� '� ��I�� A • � • � � ^ ' • /��. �\ � a,^`� \ '1 •� • I � �li I�II � � ' • �p li�l I :aD� o •' � � r J '` � �•�� '\ � � ��+E��i: ' �1 �j • • = m •i ' � �h �, ��I • • • I� ��I�;; � i ; +r � �, , m n . , . , � �.,�`.�� - �;,; i u:-L-.�' I '� /� � j � � • • • �,� i•o� f " ' • � • ,� • ' �y,A+, _ � � � �T • \ � � • • • \`�� ' I I � , • / �♦ � /�I� • � . ��'�I 1 � �• � � .� � O • .� � • /� .' 1 i. :�I• Z' O O � . l . � � • • �`/, \ �' I � �� '1� I' �:� D � � � . • I • � I � � • '��i `�,'.. . Z ./ I �w�� 9 t�i1 � w • \ �_��_.l .� � `� � � ��1 � D -1 � • � •� � � � • � , ' 1 ) / � � 1 � JpC � � � • • �Y} � � • � \ � ` _.� •',i�l� � \ � '��I. �, � � � �� / . • • • � • � l. � .._" " \\ r��1 � C � , `�:� •/�.> �� • ��' 1 ` `� --/ . � f "r� � I • • tr``� r � ..,/ • _ •� �� . � \�/ • • ' �. � . � . � • � . ^� � ' 11'�41 ' � �• /, • • � I � ' • "' / i � � � • % �� , � � . '• • \ _� i �iii:i::�D � � , ' • � \ • � 1:� I • • • • �.' . ��•'� � • � • � � � • • • • � • � , j. C. /. A. N. s� (�� `� i - - D LAWARE , �---r—A -r�. � 5ur� i�ti� � �a � �� i,: �� .��. �.y �'��.rY; I �-�: �` #. � .�� ,� S�r� �:sh � � � �� . ��. � • '�-•� � �: � � . . . . .. . .. ,, � . _ . . . ,/� . •: .. . '•i :�:: . • . . •, • . .. � . . • . . . . . , tn� . . • • i- 'i.._` i . i ,, � .� �� ' � . �. L y y � � ' G / �l�S �+�� `w. : ��' (p 8 O � O{ M1 � ' ' f \ � ` / f `v ,'' `• \��„ �� - ��,,'. O � 9 / � V3 � q ' � rol % �'L O gz %� <: : ,Sy `' is m s {+ ,+. , � o �9 4 IOp�„ �') i�.4 : � °� 6 w 5 �„�..- -.. - •3? � '?�'� ��CfL`� Si.' ,3J ty�'`�j m �i�f� ! . Q� Jn ~� �6• � 0 ~c Ai L i 7 . z � �� q'�. 2� �s3 � } 2, \�� r � 7,.�2 a � _ laT{ � � .V,yc � 3 :.� , Ji*�a � � o,� 2 . .t J t� v ` + w � ?. S+ � � ,�Sn �r * v �,j C� r'q � q ,� ` y / , I �, �� \ 3 ;j, .y �y �^ J ! 9 O i ,, �6B �i J �( �\""� ti� 5 JJ '*'p6 ,\s ..�`�'19 202 45 .4 '� st a`"` .e .°o \` ,(} �' i�AA 9d� � q1 6 N N ] a y / \ . � }� 2 O '4 - • g` , s ` i // � ,4b �� O gb e, 'O�� m �79.64 _,_ � ``� f // +�2 a 7�im �, � Z r ' J9 \\ O ��N V V 4 � � 5 � � o ,� 7 Zo tn� P � z � f t °�b ,td, •�� 287' � t �''N t59 79 6 `' l '9'' °� " � �� I , � � : `� 8 N �-3 .> 1V � ___�_,,__. --i- s go .o� 1� g2 � �- a a - " - � � �e s --__" � \ o e�, t� m� ��`% • � d _ - � 7 `` � \ s''1r'"q. �PK� � � � ae s 9 , 'l� �J 5 ��} �""��'� P 0 N D J�� i� � 9 55 6 r � 62 �f •, J� noi � 8 \""� \. �"` 'tp `� 2�7 'i'2 � �� h') M w M M O O - tn - 1 ' Ag \ q�'ry 10 b �`�,,, � d � S 5 u�, 15 � ry} g 0 \�, � t� 10 ,y '�` \ �pry y uJ?'y9 ryry 8 \� ,\ '4h � I 5 � � O JB „¢ � •:. fl ; ,�, „ , ` � o ��\ +� � ^ JT3 ��FL :> 2�' �'. m a I I a^, � v , - S r .v a � y '� �),r,',` t,- 8 i70�'� �.OA'�_ r , 1L.� 1 �;S a �Y t \ �y � ' . «'� ,y �8 i��.�g CT. i a' . 7 � °r� ^ � � � n� � 9 � v� � . ��99 n 6 +n 7 fh��k �/ �° �� ! � 2t4.97 ,� `, a ,y 1 . • �'16 �62J6'%n�}'fP . ♦ y��'r h 6 �♦ \ 206 '�,� 9° $ a' �''g �9' �,� a,� 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY'. , � 293 � ��p `oo o \ s � �v' !L s 3 Q � � � z � �sb �-:a+�r�r,,,�.�cy ,� �o � NORTH . � � �:>.�� &r�� _ SGALE 1"-200' 9 \ •` '..i:;�,9.�'•.. �9D �� o � � � � ,� �-: ._ ::�:��... :::.:.:; �� ? N 1 I 4 "'� 2 r `� _.,, ti ��: `• r: i;�±i:; �...'''�';:'•:' i3 � .. ``... . ;:: ` ;:.i;_ � •` �� p � . ...:_�;::._.:. , - „a �' �� oo.�a '� . �es :x�:. ��: �_:.. � "� a � �. N 56.01 ^ iT :::`::;t::..{k::;Yt.;:[;•: � 59 / 09 ti � � � » PAR K 4 � \'i t +t � � • =:: •:�:, :�:::.:: ••>::; � "/ ` 2 N ' 9, N Q 46. �7 4�� ; e N •�:;:;:,::;';,';:.::;� �, �� j � 1 � � �� ° � � � ' ��'�'�' ==: i i w — - ` - - � 3� - _ ? ' •. _ , S - t `'<:4:�ir:�.. . .. +2p �� „/c3 � . `��,�a�, y.y9 n �� ,t t& � -A� ,i+d .''�',1�.`'}�',$'{y':' ^* � � O � /f 9 \j ` J p� 3517„O� '�• �,�'.'�a�� 12 h� 1S �( 1 `' � , : b F. Ory � N � �� ^ / / 313,,;. d�� :`� . - � � � ; { �ry' �j\ ' /�,� `O9� i .t• J(� r' : ! �` O ti �203 N "' � V \�6 2� Z, ��. . \ 4' A � 0 q ry w u� O-0 �.. �' \ ✓ � � / � �~ 6 -•f � •� ;014 BO 1 � • � r� 1 r( � 5 w 41� ry� 1 P - 1• -, � ^'q� /// / 4!4 y 3` � V e'� p `g2 �6 �� t �\ e % � 39 a 4 a � �� i� �" 'S � '�' d'� � :nIB."JO •a ,r V 7 � ��""�1'^ ``,..,,� ,,,i � f zoe 4 0� f,o•'. pe ' �. � g 15 � n _ � u j � / .' ps a'` `°+ � :� � '3 154.24 i__ i.� 3 • 4i y n w � .....---' v � ��,. �g� a� jg./6..... / e k � �� 5 'q.� J � I 6 0 71� E ST A T�� 9��...,� _, J �ry �'0,� � 161.�4 Z m 106.SD Y � . N„ 2 � '�' ti 8 0� ��bs fOR 6EiA1:. - a gE� REwORO HpGSTRQM KING PARK 131.95 �� O..:'�2 98 Z �ry �� ! 7 0 4 n �,'. Q4:}�Q 6� �75.07 165.74 � n� Y� 17i.lT � z4� t 7a. 53 a 1 b� r t et n " ��H.ei ��D.zl O N N � p � N (y , � J r"i£i�tZ OS � yr �.p,,� i8 O 7 A � N �8 A "7 .+ 7� I e 240 ' l59.23 r :•r�/�,i! 7?"A t �t.96 i` � n 162.14 a � IQ4.00 0 M f.I�� ` R J 17B � i m - � • �OM�76.6� 1679 �'��28 $ I 3� �A9.2t J f23 Q6 Ev .:.� _242.44 �_ _ �30'n� � OUTLOT p 4UT�07 Q �sss.s�- - 7 � �4Ed �r■■ „ w May 6, 1991 City of Mendota Heights Planning Commission ��ity Gouncil Dears Sirs, We are submitting this letter, along with all applicable plans, drawings, and fees, to indicate our intention of adding an open air deck to our residence which is located at 2452 Pond Circle East, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. As indicated on the enclosed drawing, the deck will be constructed of cedar decking and a treated lumber frame work. The deck will be an "L” shape with a maximum wi�th of 19'6" and a maximum depth of 19". The deck will be off the rear of the house and will be a�proximately 10' off the ground. The house has french doors off the kitchen leading out to where the deck is intended to be built_ All construction will be completed by the end of August 1991 and will be in accordance with all applicable Minnesota Uuilding codes. We have reviewed the drawings and plans with our immediate neighbors and they have approved of our plans and have indicated their approval by signing below. Sincerely, John A. Gregoire Joan M_ Gregoire We have reviewed the plans related to proposed deck, as discussed above, and consent to build the deck as planned: �� - �_ ��_- -- --- ---- - ------------ � i ►� the Gregoires' we hereby grant our � 1��V N��t�li�� . - - . � - ��Y �' i°� (�-� ��`'�'I � C ity o� .,.. �, � 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name: i7 (' G�� Y' �. �o�j (F'ust) Address: � �/u�� ./� .� � C, ��/ (Number & Street) Owner Name: Address: Case No. �- � Date of Application - la � Fee Paid" � (City) �.�� y�/e �. h9�,.�� & Street) (City) (State) � / `�.�.� �a �5.�:i.,e) (Zip) ^ � a �Nli� Street Location of Property in Question: 2L/.�.1- / a n�% G�r� P,C� s%' � ,S%d.. L7 Legal Description of Property: �O �'' ,,��, c•� ��_ ar � SLi � r e LCS �u � / Type of Request: Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. � Weflands Permit Plan Approval Other (attach explanation) ' Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number ��O Z Section -��Y Present Zoning of Property �— � Present Use s��, �-- �-�^ �� y Proposed Zoning of ProPertY �„�- -� Proposed Use 5� t-5 (R. �,-v..� � t y I hereby declare ihat all statements made in this request and on the addifi nal � material are true. gnature of Applicant) �-/--�I/ - (Date) ' �zz�9� � . , _ (R ived by - Tide) 1101-Victbria Curve • 1Viendota Heights; 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 � �` - .�,�� i , . wx 1� � � r{� . . � �\- • . . �� • �• 0 �' �C� • /�+ � .� O\ ; � , �,� � � . � �, � �- :� � �.� .� , � � � /� �� . � � . ; � � cr J. �,,,,,,,��. : j //�, �f: � \� /t ( V� , J f 1� / ` � � • � �� • �� \� . � • �� f � � ^� � � �. • {tQ"' �L �' '`'� � f � • �.,��` �� /•� , � � .' ' r�� . ~ �_ 1'� .--� �..... � � .� �' ., �, ! i ��- � � � r � ` _. - / f , �*•\ _� ; ^� .�� ' �°� PR pP �� i 7 ` � � ck �. ' � � . � � � � NOTES � � - , f� ;r {,�/ ��8 k/. ,� , I /7 , 1• DECK TO BE ELEVATED TO MEET lpr �V � � � �� - � S �.' 1ST FLR.ELEVATION. �� n. ,,- �� • � . �-;"� ��.- ' �'v 2.PROTECT ALL SIGNIFICANT TREES. ; ti Fk yo'' r'` ' t � �.� C/S� � �► ��. � I 3. ALL FRAME AND SUPPORT MEMBERS ' ,�� rL�=-" `�1 �S �7 . '. �� , f� • +�� .�� - TO BE TREATED LUMBER. DECKING t� ��-� ��45. f � � TO BE CEDAR (2" NOM.). f + �.' k � , �� , �'�� 1 �' { �� ' .'r �Q ! � � 4. ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO -.�)' I� �r % � • PROVISIONS OF U.B.C., � '^� � -- 3�. [ , .� � q- �.. 1��,�..'1 , - 3-33'��v �, I j }� 1 • .3j �j � ,� (S ! _ �'$,�'r( `�•C'C:IKG SCALE 1'=20• M 1 �. � a� ...-- �. ^--� � �0 . .. �4.5,`t � •f .l • � � f `� "'� � � ' --- ��-� , . � � � � ,,�, r • • --. � ` � � � ��31'01.3� �� ',.. � � , � �� . ��- / •. •l •O� '. f � . Con�. cur�► � � � PROPOSED OPEN DECK CONSTRUCi'ION .. E'�'t!1 _ t3, ��J � � ��„� � ' � - --- i�ati'� -5 . �� • J.GREGOIRE , � • � 2452 POND CIRCLE E. � . Lot 10, Block 4, Hampshire Estates J. GREGOIRE 2452 POND CIRCLE E. � .. / ►^,- I �l' I �y .. . . �.; Y� . . . _ �..� � . � I •� ti , : I ' � . ,• , t „ • ' i � . � � 0,\717 �. .... • f ,i .-��' '.�t'��`—�si i �. � Y _ ��' . 4----� � �d pv . i��' �. � � � ,,t . _ � � . . !U , � �.�,�r ' � .. 8�� - ->; , - : ; . T��-`\ . : ' . � , ' + . �� . X• � ,, ; ,,.; , � , _ ��- - -_: . -. __ . . . _ � ... _.,. .. . . �, . . .. . _ .... . . . _i ��.�._.__:. �. � .. �� ,.�� ; � - /� � ; � � � �'� ., , . - .� /��ta i � �' !�x(� �r��cE��Y�� Ml:c� 0�(�s�AK Godd �� . ' -�S-fS , „ � NA�r�c:+�orzsE`r.�i�k ` � �'� a c Facc.�Nr��N��F&:4�ri �a o'' I ' v � r �a . � ZX 1t� i��✓1�`up•1�t�r�1�. �:�T ov 13AS�rN�,t1�' � , �� I b��F.�� w��-�-' t�" aC. �ou►31��cJ Rt4�t•s ' . ; � � � j 5�f �C�DAh... �Ec.I:.tN� � ; � , . . , � Rd�� Efr��a t 39 i - �. Yi�.t.EY Cv"o`-- i i. . ' ;� _ ��n�� _ _ _� -- .I _� _� — � ;., � Exs�-ri,�� tl��Ckof•t�' 84St/ltiN7 l.u�'/.sSfi��iiE G4�tlf; �',o,, . � � � - - -- - - - -- -- � - - - -- - - - - - ,.1..Y.._.�.-- -- � _ . . . . .. .= .. �.._._.__ __......... .---�__..----�... �y- � � .....__. ._ ._ ..... _.---�----...__..� � � • � pQnpr �cGn n�rll f1GTllII C m r� �� inT�tlw 1 \/Ir\ A I /\ A/r[�T\ � J. GREGOIRE 2452 POND CIRCLE E. � SCALE 114°=1' + • � r - � . C ity o� .�,, �. � 1Viendota I-Ieights May 22, 1991 Mr. John Gregoire 2452 Pond Circle East Mendota Heights, MN 55120 . Dear Mr. Gregoire: Your application for a Aetlands Permit will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesdap, May 28, 1991. The Planning Coinmission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.NL, here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order• that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, lCc.�-�.:-. �� Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 0 .. . ..: s •. a.. • i'f�', ' : r..J,.';u - , .a . ' tc�j- .'c'�':'-•.'�'�ky,' �`' � �� :��` ��.:1101 � Victoria�� Curve • 1Vlendota�� - �� ` � ��.�i.s,�. ,.r:. . -Heights;xlVlN��°,55118 ��:�452 �1850:��`;��z��' . ...�,- :... _� _ .,:;.�.�:--1; ' - • � .. . � . �. . , _ :f�._ , _ :;�.,�" .. . •� ` , . . : , r,�_•l .c•.>...': .. " , . , r " . ^'S :,"•` • ; ' " � C ity o� .�..�, 1Viendota Heights May 30, 1991 Mr. Gary Hagstrom 2249 Pond Circle West Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Hagstrom: . Your application for a Wetlands Permit will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will .% be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chamber�. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Wetlands Permit to allow construation of a deck to within 73.5 feet of the wetlands. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, � �� 1� !� Kevin Batchelder � Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb ; • ., , . . . , _ � , _ . . . : - . � . :�. - . � . � . � . _ . ,� . , i�R�i ' �: .tti.+ `'3�+. . ^�•:� ' �. r ;` � >;�it :fi�«;:.�,.� i � �� ;�� 1101 �Victoria�Cur:ve �• 1Viendota,�Heiglits;"�1ViN�='v5118 w�`�:�452 • 1850 �'u� �� `� � � . t� . .� . , >., _ . , .. . � . . , . . ��: � . , .,�-.... � _� �, . , ' ' ` . . • ,j... ',.i,' �� _ � �r. = r .x • • , - ' _ ' . . . �" , _ , • . _ . .. ._ , .�v^ , . .. ., � • , . . . - . " . ' ti _ ' �. �. .. . , ,. ^ • ,;�' � 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission May 22, 1991 FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan� SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-14: Hagstrom - Wetlands Permit • DISCIISSION 4 Mr. Gary Hagstrom, of 2249 Pond Circle West, has made application for a Wetlands Permit to construct a deck 73.5 feet from the Wetlands in his rear yard. This residence is one of the nine houses identified by staff at the last Planning Commission meeting in a Wetlands/Deck Report. (See attached planners memos and maps). The home currently has an existing Wetlands Permit of eighty- five feet (85'). Construction of the deck would require an adjustment to a 73.5 foot setback. The applicant has provided signatures of consent from his adjoining neighbors. ACTION REOIIIRED Consider waiving the public hearing. Review the requested Wetlands Permit and make a recommendation to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb , ' . PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CON3IDERATION3: 28 May 1991 91-14 Gary M. Hagstrom 2449 Pond Circle West Wetlands Permit for Deck 1. The subject property is one of several in this area where an adjustment to the Wetlands Permit is required in order to construct the second story decks which were par� of the original plans for these homes. When this area was originally platted, Wetlands Permits were granted for the building pads without consideration for the fact that the plans for these homes included access to� second story decks which when built would extend further into the area protected by the Wetland Ordinance. The reason for this is described in greater detail in our planning report for case number 91-10, dated April 23, 1991 and which was prepared for another property in this same area. Much of the discussion in that report also applies to this application. 2. To summarize the basic contents of the report referenced above, the Wetlands Ordinance requires a permit for the construction or alteration of a"structure" within an area 100 feet landward of the normal high water level of a designated wetland. At the time the original permits were granted, the City was not interpreting decks as a structure. This was due to the belief that the construction of decks would not significantly effect a wetland environment since it involves little excavation. However, an increase in the concern regarding the preservation of wetland environments has led the City to interpret the definition of a structure more strictly and to require a Wetland Permit for all "structures" which meet the definition in the Ordinance i.e.; "anything constructed or erected the use of which requires location on the ground". 3. The proposed deck is to be located approximately 73.5 feet from the pond. The original permit granted for this lot allowed construction to within 90 feet of the pond. Therefore, the proposed modification to the permit would be for an additional 16.5 feet. `r� � . _ . �{ . � ,,.,��,� _ \ - �� -__�__l= � �_.= ,'~� ` _ ---1-- . . - - .,. � f. _ �� :. � . � . �: � C �\\ � -- � - ` :�_ .xw� � :: f111E MAIL t � ' ; i' \ . \ 1 �• . =Q�W y C' ' � -^��• � �` � _ �,�� "_-=�. ,,.,.�`' ; «� . ,, - •' - • �° :i � � -� r��,.�' • �', _ i,A.•r _ .", � '' - -'�' I .. �� -�� •.t,~ '� \ 1, ! �� • � .•� -- •-- � .. '� � .. � s i . r �-�i % ,2.. !, j � i I ;� � . � u o � '• •. a ♦ • �' � • C8 . �� EASErENi o• _" '. 'r' ��.. ' • s .� .. �{, NOQ1H£FN �4l . � .— • ` • • , \ ` . . s• ,�� _ .„ ' — u 1 ___ ._' . .i �( � .; � , • I • • � Z� .'`L � }��=f$)€N�Y MARSH � � A �� `.., ��ti!��' , � .;,-: �"_-'- t� •�`\ µ -�"X`}•PARK �� • • cc+�• i � •�. � . '. :1:__...__ • •• . ). �—r .�� ` ' • - . �� ' � I • i � ' . S . • • a: s� � + ♦ � � �� s • ` �� '�, • . �C. `' i • � �. . � I • ...� � • _ • •+� • �.... ' '�.�� .r� • ` • �.= • � ,,,,, _ • • �i _— r. . • -J;"� ��'--:7' 1 _ � i • - � '� a! s4• • ♦ � • r_� _ :�.. . : •-. � %�' • � • ,= �l - • — ( ,. �. ' • _ . . _ • t: j ; •,r. •, • . . .- _� _ _ .• : .� �1. `r , . ,�^ "j I ��• . ir� �. . ` .a. > � —`° f✓ ' 4 �� (.., . �• i � f, . � �_� �� • J�� C�w, w. � • � - a 1 / .t. :�� Y� ' � /":^`. h�+� � , ( ' ' ! � . s . � . / • ,s, P jj �t: " s ' [. � 4 -I ''t �I�� _ '�' .+�'. :`"r� �+ / QP ( !r" r� +r �� ; � + �. st:EM L� �j[[[.`��l� •�• � � � �j/ �^"" K ,K+ � � s\\'�ti```��,\\`� �^"'"_ _ 'I t � • • � � M1 , � • Y ��i d � £ _. . •�� '� � .','. .. �.^j / � I : • � fp �' �' ,�T- --�/ � !'_. Q • /� • � J�y, : # � . • • y •• — . / , .�',.. Q c'�� / • • '�! , � _ .3 `' • � � ..�=. . t � � `' `�� Q \� •� -� !♦ s • �, 't j � . • a ' '� •�� ` �:._.J,� ` W • •• '--`�", • . = •�-' 1 ,'� ' i ' __: � w kP`'�� r^-�..^.�:;- ; SUBJECT PROPERTY - ,�;;q, � _ r. - -� .�,.. p , �M � � . •� �'�!• • • • � � ' {��,:••�••�•� � fl � • ` . • ..f�.� _ .. f • . ' APA • • NORTH .`::`::��:'� -- ., . _ .� _ __ • _._ � • _ , -�=-=--� � ' . .=.. �t� . SCALE i"=800' 2�=w � .., . . aew+ooneo , �w.es+ ''..� .. . eun� cT f�� wEtl ` to i! � r `• 1 � — ` "''� • � • � • � HAGSTROM•KfNG � � ' �•;: • � j � J �,' . '�'t�y i ' ` �_ • « � PARK -' • I . 22T'N . �" •• ... t . ' 1 . . � ; .t � _ ' _ � +„ _ : _ _..%�_.�i� �� _ . �. : • ,. ' �.- .T--�' � ,�; . . r ' l��w, /� �� E ROAO � r ~ J�~` �Za w� + � _ } r s _ � _.._...W � w � � ,•�y.+�K � •O�Cd '� ; : � �a� t��. \N`` t' '�M� � - ' �w� 4 j ��i(j' `�O - 2ik•7Y' = : r • m` �.��,.xi ' ,.. � i�� lpi,}� t �t _ _ : r +...,,,,,_ . , _1'__. . J • ....�-�L.••�. ./"'J J� �� I • ,. \ / � ` • - •,./ �• • . � 1 ` b� A � = W ^_ 1 �� )t 1 � , �' y,\ »ta V, < f e !d, < �. . . / ;;;e � ::� . - -- _� , ,-, a � : I 1 � x , I� �'i�, w f __... ��\ I .f�o:a.. ,h�„�.. ��NA.yJ Fiy.f� \`�( 1 ; �.:.; - I `� u _ . T_-.\ � � � f,�; jl^~� �..�-�"� ��: �lN, , . I i � �, ` �r �, ,\ ' , ,Y,{; , — �``, � • l. ' i * 't ' . i R ' . . J o a • ',.,y 4� • M� . r �. 1 � � � -� � �t%�'_ .' . �_� . '"``"' �R ,.�w• ' .�. : � � V'• : — _ _ - _ _ _. — �LT,:� i`aIER7TAf7� R� � _ _ _ ._ _ _ �„_-„�_ —re-.�i "� _. = — _ ` � / 1.' � ,.. - _ , � . '�"^� • ��`•/ : .. •�� .. � . . . • � . _ .`�.i'�'.. . .... - - .�:.�y.;%'•� � . - -- �. ' •'- .. �.. ..• ... - • . . ' ' . ' `.. - ::-r � � � - - � - , �-:= � r „ _ r � -s .- � j _" �: :.-' - , � � Y �� t .. - , }.� ' -. � L i � f�\ - C� � � . - -- ,_s - . 1R . I J ;'\ i I 3 �` ��3 H, �„� 10 �gry/ v��ry ��.�9 :1_�... 'rO. nn ' � / ` �ng � ��lr =3 0 9 y � y� NH p \ 7 � ?? y /� ..� I O ?' S:l `\ 6 8 � i� 0 �` • , R � ' f ,� � �, � 'a' � \`� y3 � ? 7 P e � , ;1•� O 6 � �Qi 19 ? 1J ro a Op „ q .g p `t 6 w 5 v a F �aF ' 's a � �', R� � i. .3a J4 0� � �- '? B= �� F� � `. m' , �\�� TAII I1 � ' � o �� .� 4q� � . • % ' �?�1 i 3 � � � ; I2 ° / 2 � 3 .:� , '4q � O 2'. T y � �� p JQRC Q�-�' " � /`�v `'�o � :i '^ 0 �, s% ~ � .T.� ' �\ v � �� 9 . ' ^ 4 y � :� � 4 .. . ;' �� S m � �� Bm m o • '� a 3 V i'. IZ % •! � ti° S ,r ga �s :: y�e 2oz ^ I �`� y��4 °� �'9 \ 1,0 6 v,, N 3 . / .'�`•. 4 �'' ' ., $ \ y° � ° � - � _. `°6 �B \ 06 OI � �19 69 ,t O a m � � `'\ � j 3 a ��a w f`� � / l ,� J9 �` % �(t1�°� P V 2 �, o I (y! �' � �o � \\ y02 Z � � 1 .•'� 159 79 I � •. / � Sr ,j P N T 6 ; ` : $ e � � =„ _, I � � - ----r m •'__�'��. ` O 9`�, � ,4 8Z 0, i\� ? 1 I M m w �M M O 0 O - N - _ . -•-•' � \ KK \ � a Z m � � m � � . ♦ � 7 . \ J�J� '4q 6 P P y o�" ,�' m, J9 5 14 - 9 S P 0N D ��` �,,, SS \' s , z �•s � o� 8 ��\ i�„ 4, �\\ 2` � 6 �i9�2 S S �n I \ \ �� `fi' � r �� .a) , s3 9D / \ 1 L I O y \\ � 1 0 " J6, I rJ / ti 9 0 � y �,g, h �� ` \ ^O_ S y�JJ�9 S2 ry e \\ �:+ �\ ry, I 5 N I C) °B J.,p �,• .� e� �o� �., a� o. ,,� a� i 1 � � `� °� �� e �10'��- �e�' SUBJECT PROPERTY . s `' \ " : ' ,, � , ° T , �� Jn \ \ . f. ,�� • r �' � O � \ S B�9 �" �° � � � , �� NORTH , • 9 n 6 n � � \ �� " N 1�� • 6�0 SCALE 1"=200' '•. :. 206 �2 �� ,qp � �b9 t �' 4 " f'� :.;:;#':::_;;:, ` J �*^ ez9s � �PG o �o + � :;�:`•::2..�;:¢'E.:�. '`n /�� ` i �� ° m 3 `% a � 6 '•::.?.��::v:. ' L =� �G � . �:��:i�.'�:•. ''ti�:�:ti;?E'.' i.':j:ti:{C _ a' � �� f •c 3• r17/ '� y0 ' o a 5 ^ 1'r::�X:�?�1 '�{{}<:?it��•'.`} ri . � 4 4' � O o '1w•>;y::•:;:>:•..'::+=::;=; ;:�; :<;• i � ` a �jdJ::•':'}'}:::+,{;;;;$::j'..i'i:}:}<{:{:i� \ � 9D � O � y� �� .r,�•,r�.:.:}_??i:;5:.:;:::;:;:'ti:t:'.��{.::ti�.�ri� � 4 N II ? � �� i♦ �� `'m 2 i �� `� :':'''::":'i`•'i'::}`:::::;{; ;?:; y:?i;;�." �� 9! t2 � i 7 B �i 's�'•:::::;:::;; ;;c.;.:;.;:y.:;:;: 13 .o ' '00.�6 E6.0� — '`•:t;iat} �.". 1 0 \`\ � 59 � 09 ,�;/\►� � P , , .N .:::�::::�::::::�:: ��: .: V . PAR K 9 /� \� I V L/ �76. 17 �•' I �'�' o \ \ 1 + p 9 ..• � A � 1 8 N:'' V, ry � � 8i � 2 i 9.� . � , � ~ � �� --- ' � M ` ° � � A' I I a y� - -- -- 3. �_ �C'� ' • - . � '•7=�. � / � ri '2p IU� � 1`��0�' �y9 ^ I' � 7 Q�Jy� .��0 1'O�� 2 N� �3 �, i � � ? DSi7�`.� ? �y� 0 N a � 9 J r ��? 1 t �O I n \ � � � 3,�� d�ye � .,: ^' - � 1 \ ~ �, 6 �� ,' ,� a9'-• _ .:. � �� I � ry "" Y Z' � �� i � ti b �?p3 ry � Vr e \�6 .,.2� A� �1 r. ' \\ .� M � //� o J °i y pn' .w.� o '�ye "� +.�4 e0 14 � _�� ` /� �\ ` ^� � 2 S ^ � `e ` ' J � Pm o� ,q2 \S 1 ,/ � �� h � � .� d ' � ., i � � �'y � 9 � � � :.ie.so � � � o �, {/ /�• \ `~`~�`"_"�_ � ' /? 4 o�bo � ��'�f 06 `�a..� _ �; � 165 24 d y � � �Q e ' �V =� 4 1 i + � h � �� 3 �i°�v . 3 C e � iu m �D �9.i6.� _. e �1� 5 b � 16 O 2,99i� `. kO V � � ti� E ST A T E S A� �:� o�l,�ry �� ',�,... z m Ib6.0� - am 2 � �� ,�i h 8C�a� � P�PT fOR OEtAI:. ^�.• : 2 ry y 6 ��fnI� � 17 SEE RE:.ORD HAGSTROM K�NG PARK 171.9� /O ..:'42 9B o� d. o � m n ,(�••., /42 }�Q 173.07 Il6J� 'o to 17�.f7 6 6 '3 �17C. �3 m I y`� � t N in _ r r z�o ��o.2i a i g 7 �' `� v �I �qg e2 �� HEIGZ4o5 I 7g � N N _ n a 18 ' 168.8E 71.� �` n � 182.14 178 0�' p o ��r -� d�EIGHTS, � ,e,.�o - 166 � T � e 240 199.2! � / IOt.10 . 2 �:id6 „, ': 56.89 IB9.2� � 12S 06 76.64 \./i� .::�p2D.28 Z42.44 g �,9� 130 OS i �UTLOT 8 576. 64 1 I 192.44 �-' 192.44 40.6 OUT�OT A • o n 155H3S-- ___� O � 4 0 May 8, 1991 The Planning Commission City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Gary M. Hagstrom 2449 Pond Circle West Mendota Hts ., NIl�T 5512 0 Dear Sir or Madam: .� Application is hereby made for a Wetlands Permit and Building Permit to have constructed a deck at 244� Pond Circle West. i Per the attached drawings, the deck will extend 8 feet beyond the back of the house, placing the outer most point 73.5 feet from the pond. . Your favorable consideration of this request will be appreciated. •� � � .� . � �I��'`t.�i��:� .�� -. •.. GMH/rb/6360 Enclosure The undersigned, being the neighbors adjoining 244� Pond Circle West, confirm that we have been provided for a review a plan of the proposed deck, and have no objectio}� to it.�� John and`J n (Gr 2452 Pond ircle � � � �A � ��' ` ��'�,r,, Ca 1 and Julie Ber t 244 Pond Circle West ;, � � \ J ? C ity o� . .�..�. 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. - � `� Date of Application -�- Fee Paid �� .(�� C �'" `l ApplicantName: Ha�strom Garv M PH: 454_ (�st) (F'ust) (r'� wi�-�33�-'a� Address: 2449 Pond Circle West . Mendota Hts. MN 55120 (Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) OwnerName: Same (I.ast) (F'ust) (1� " Address: S ame � (Number & Sireet) (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: S ame LegalDescriptionofProperty: Lot 9, Block 4 Hampshire Estates � Dakota County, MN - Type of Reque.st: Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property Present Use Proposed Zoning of Property ; Proposed Use Variance Subdivision Approval � Weflands Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request d' . •-� material are true. � ' � � - - ( ture of � pplicant) � ' • . , . , �, , . • . ' •T . ' �a�) - ' - , ' r , .� s; 4 � ' . . . - . ' _ . . . . (Received by - Title). ' _ { . ,, " , �'.: :- i • ,;aa: � 1-- , , , � , M . . . .. . , ".._ _ . - -=y"��"`l:,!4i*.a` . �''X � :�;. �,;: �: �.;a�1101.Victoria, Curve��`1Viendota� Heights,� 1VIN;�: 55118 .�°��452 � 1850 � `�� u::=��'� � � . � , . . � �.<• .. . .. , ,: � , . _ _ . . � , -�� .: � . ,� . .. ... , : .* . ;, _ .. 9 C ity o� .�. � �.l 1Viendota Heights May 22, 1991 Mr. Gary Hagstrom 2249 Pond Circle West Mendota Heights, MN 55120 . Dear Mr. Hagstrom: Your application for a Aetlands Permit will be � considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, May 28, 1991. The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.N�,,, here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 1Lc-��...- (� �.-1�-_ Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb � 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 18�0 � TO: FROM: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO Mayor, City Council and City Guy Kullander, Parks Project May 31, 1991 Administ a Manager %� SUBJECT: Lightning Protection for Mendakota Park Buildings Recently a lightning strike occurred at a ballfield complex in Eagan damaging the electrical system and starting a fire in a concession/restroom building. Fortunately none of the bal� players and spectators huddled on the second story observation deck were injured. � I have received a bid of $1,090 to install lightning protection to all three structures at Mendakota Park. Additional costs would include the installation of one inch (1") plastic conduit from the roof to the ground which would be installed by the electrician working on the buildings plus painting of the conduit to match the color of the concrete block. These extra costs would be under $500. ACTION REOUIRED If Council so desires to have lightning protection installed at the three structures within Mendakota Park, they should pass a motion directing staff to issue a purchase order to Thompson Lightning Protection for $1,090 and to direct staff to issue change orders to the electrical and painting subcontractors (change orders not to exceed $500) to install and paint one inch (1") plastic conduit as required. GK:kb y 05/31/91 08:32 $612 455 25�5 THO�PSON L. P. i�� ENDOT� HEIGHTS �003/0�� ``� Since 791Q THOMPSON LICHTN'�NG PROTECTION, IN�. 901 Sibley Hr'grtway • Saint Paul, MN 55115-?792 • 612•455-7667 Te/ex 29-8436 Q�OTATION May 31, 1991 PROJECT: I"SENDAKOTA COMMUNITY PARK Mendata Heights, MN 3) Kiask Gentlemen: BID DATE: We are pleased to quote you far the Lightning Protection System installed complete on the above project. Per Drawing No. , Sheet No. , Dated The installation wi].l be made in complete conformance with the above p�ans and code requirements as of January, 1983, LPI 175, NFPA 78 and UL 96A and we guarantee complete satisfaction �o the owner, architect and contractor. < Our figure for the completely instailed Lightning Protection System is $250.00 Thanking you for this opportunity of quoting, we remain, ' Very truly yours, THO ON LIGHTNiNG PROTECTION, INC. i Douglas ran in ice resi en NOTES; 25 ft: 1" PVC conduit by Electrical Contractor. y `� �05/31/91 08:31 $612 �55 2545 THO�PSON L. P. i;� �iENDOTa HEIGHTS C� 002/004 sinco 1s7o THOMPSON LIGHTNING PROTECTION, INC, 901 Sibiey Highway • Saint Paul, MN 557 18-1792 • 612-455-7661 Te/ex 29-8436 Q�J'OTATION May 31, 1991 PROJECT: MENDAKOTA COMMUNITY PARK Mendota Heights, MN 2) Comfort Station Gentlemen: SID DATE: We are pleased to quote yau for the Lightning Protection System insta3.led complete on the above project. Per Drawing No. , Sheet No. , Dated The install.ation will be made in complete conformance with the above plans and code requirements as af January, 1983, LPI 175, NFPA 78 and UL 96A and we guarantee complete satisfaction to the owner� architect and contractor. Our figure for the completely installed Lightning Protection System is 5�50.00 Thanking you for this opportunity of quoting, we remain, Very tru].y yours, � " THOMPSON LZGHTNING PROTECTION', INC. b Douglas ran�lin/Vice President NOTES: 25 ft. 1" PVC conduit by Electrical Contractor.. e � 05/31/91 08.31 $612 �55 25�5 THO�PSON L. P. i�� ENDOTa HEIGHTS �I001/06�� r� Since 1910 THCIMPSON I,IGHT'N�NG PROTECTICIN, IN�. 901 Sibley Highway • Saint Pau�, MN 55118-1792 • 612-455-7661 Telex 2s-8436 QU�TA�`YO�T May 31, 1991 PR4JECT: MENDAKOTA CQMMUNZTY PARK Mendofia Heights, MN l� Picnic Shelter Gentl,emen : B I D i}ATE ; � We are pleased to quote you fc= the Li.ghtning Protection 5ystem installed camplete on the �bove project. Per Drawing No. , 5heet No. , Dated The a.nstallation wi11 be made in complete conformance with the above p�.�ns and code requirements �,s of Jar�uary, 1983, LPT 175, NFPA 7$ and UL 96A and we guarantee comple�e satisfactian ta �he owner, architect and contractor. Our figuse for the comp3.ete,ly installed Lightning Protecti.on System is $390.Q0 Thankxng you foz tha.s oppos�uni.ty of quatiag, we remai.n� N�TES: 30 ft. 1" very truly yours, THOMPSON LIGHTNxNG PROTECTION, INC. � Daugl.as rankli /Vicc� Pses� e PVC conduit by Electrical Contractor. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 31, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Leave of Absence Request - Kim Blaeser DISCIISSION The City's Personnel Code stipulates that employees.may take unpaid leaves of absence upon approval of the City Council. I have received a request from Kim Blaeser for approval of a three month maternity leave of absence, and am submitting this memo on Kim's behalf. Kim's expected due date is July 18th, and it is her intent to work as long as possible up to that date. Kim has therefore requested a leave from approximately July 18th to approximately October 18th, actual dates to be determined by circumstances as they develop. I support Kim's request for a leave of absence, although it will certainly affect the work flow through City Hall. Administrative staff is currently discussing ways in which to address Kim's leave, and within the next few weeks I will bring forth a recommendation on how to best cover the period of time Kim is gone. Since Kim's leave will be unpaid, it should be no problem for the budget to support any type of temporary clerical assistance deemed necessary. RECOMMENDATION ^ I recommend that Council authorize a three month unpaid leave for Kim Blaeser as per her request. ACTION REOIIIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to authorize a three month unpaid leave of absence for Kim Blaeser as per her request. MTL:kkb � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 31, 1991 TO: Tom Lawell, City Administrator FROM: Kim Blaeserl SUBJECT: Request for Leave of Absence � As you know, I am e�pecting baby number two araund July 28, 1991. I am therefore respectfully requesting an unpaid leave of absence starting sometime'around July �8th. I hape to �eturn to work on Octaber 28, 1991. ACTIQN REQUIRED Your approval af my request and Gouncil action to grant my request for leave of absence from around July 28, 1993. and ending tJctober 28, 1991. � , TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 Mayor, City Council and City Adminis a�� James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire o Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis a CASE NO. 91-14: Hagstrom - Wetlands Permit DISCIISSION Mr. Gary Hagstrom, of 2249 Pond Circle West, appeared before the May Planning Commission meeting to request a Wetlands Permit to allow a deck to be constructed within 73.5 feet of the Wetlands. See attached memos and Planner's Report. The applicant adjoining neighbors. RECOMMENDATION has provided signatures of consent from his The Planning Commission voted unanimously to waive the public hearing and recommend that the City Council grant a Wetlands Permit for a deck, as proposed, to be within 73.5 feet of the Wetlands. ACTION REOIIIRED If the City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission recommendation, they should pass a motion to waive the public hearing and to grant a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a deck to within 73.5 feet of the Wetlands. JED/KLB:kkb % . May 30, 1991 Mr. John Gregoire 2452 Pond Circle East Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Gregoire: C ity o� 1Viendota Heights Your application for a Aetlands Permit will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Cour�il Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve your requested Aetlands Permit at seventy-five feet (75'), conditioned on Engineerinq staff verification of distance to pond. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. ' KLB:kkb Sincerely, K.�-�?n� �ll Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant � . � ; - - � � 1101 Victoria Curve �1Viendota Heights,-1VIN.• 55118 : �:: �;452• 1850 - � .�.� .��- ' -� � y TO: FROM: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 Ma or Cit Council and City Admini�C�� or Y � Y - James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir t Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-16: DISCIISSION Skar - Wetlands Permit Mr. Duane Skar, of 2491 Pond Circle West, appeared before the May Planning Commission meeting to request a Wetlands Permit in order to construct a five foot (5') vinyl clad chain link fence enclosing his rear yard. See attached memos and Planner's Report. The applicant adjoining neighbors. RECOMMENDATION has provided signatures of consent from his The Planning Commission voted unanimously to waive the public hearing and to recommend that the City Council grant a Wetlands Permit allowing construction of the fence, as proposed, to enclose the rear yard which is within thirty-three feet (33') of the Wetlands. � ACTION REOUIRED If the City Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion waiving the public hearing and granting a Wetlands Permit allowing construction of the fence, as proposed, to within thirty-three feet (33') of the Wetlands. JED/KLB:kkb � � 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission May 22, 1991 FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan��_`''/ SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-16: Skar - Wetlands Permit for Fence DISCIISSION � Mr. Duane Skar, of 2491 Pond Circle West, desires to construct a five foot (5') vinyl clad chain link fence enclosing his rear yard. A portion of the fence is within the one hundred foot (100') setback required for structures within a Wetlands. Fences are considered structures within our Zoning and Wetlands Ordinances. (See attached plans and memos). The proposed fence appears to be within thirty-three feet (33') of the Wetlands and is not within the scenic easement. The applicant has provided signatures of consent from his adjoining neighbors. ACTION REOUIRED Consider waiving the public hearing. Review the requested Wetlands Permit and make a recommendation to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb t PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONB: .y 28 May 1991 91-16 Duane C. Skar 2491 Pond Circle West Wetlands Permit For fence installation 1. The subject property is located such that a portion of the rear yard falls within the area protected by the Wetland Ordinance. The property is not actually- on the wetland though the home on this property aan be seen from the homes opposite it on the pond. The applicant wishes to install a 5 foot high, vinyl clad, chain link fence around the perimeter of his back yard. The purpose of the fence is to enclose the back yard to keep his young children away from the pond and the ball fields in Hagstrom-King park which is adjacent to his property on the south. 2. Approximately half of the applicant's back yard is included within the 100 foot area protected by the Wetland Ordinance. Requiring the applicant to construct the fence outside of the 100 foot setback would result in a very awkward configuration and would severely limit the use of the applicant's back yard. 3. The proposed fence would meet the necessary standards in the Wetland Ordinance for the issuance of a permit. No vegetation will be removed and no grading will be done to install the fence. In addition, the fence meets all of the other requirements for a fence within the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The type of fence proposed by the applicant creates the least possible visual impact of almost any fencing available. In addition, the applicant has included a landscape plan with his application materials indicating his intent to further landscape his back yard. The proposed landscaping will not be located between the fence and the pond but it will, over time, improve the aesthetic appeal of the property and the environment in this area of , ; � ' . Duane C. Skar, Case 91-16 Page 2 the pond. The subject property is also located in a corner of this pond where there is some existing vegetation which will help screen this property from some of the other homes on the pond. 5. We believe the request for a Wetlands Permit to allow a fence within the wetland protection area is reasonable and will not result in any adverse effect on the adjacent pond. � ' �=L�_" 1_'T'a" ) , -.�.. _ ,\ � r _ f �-,:, � . . r. - _ , ��, _ - � �-� . . : ��: �. F�/1 � I .. �:: � � -- � - -� � w�wE � s.�� /�. FInE n � `� • • 3 . i . \= — _ _ • C.� • \ �n�r � �H ' �. � .�}'• � / _ � �` � • . .�' �� . �, � _ i �� _� ` / .� .. ��_ '' ' •' i . � ,l "-=�. —;_' � '� � � t1 -� . l.'i ' � C � � i j I , � - � � � � . : f ` � . � ��-- -- } I r,• , r �: � . � I ' ' •. � �: I , �� Q y Q � + : . E MOAtr1ENF ��T ppwEq ' CO _� EASE�EMi p "' " � �� . ' '__ "" __�' 11 "' _ � "� • • • � � - . ' ' � ' sr� £$1�N(�.Y MARSH l Z � Q �� . �� n ; • ' �--- �• � ~ •• •�a �_��YII PARK � • � '• ti , ' '•�:: � � �-1._� •' _• ; <. `l � � . �� '/. � � ,. • . -- • �� . �. _• � . � ,�<. � ' ' ' � ��; � ` , . _.. � �--- �.;,�-,. ,�-, • • t,}'' ��-- . '� • � _ �f��i i ,,.i. > • _ . ; •.,: ;�• ,.,. , •,. � . j _ _ �:�-. � • • � � ' ♦ . Gt • r. `\ � � ' . - • 1 . ' ' �: • / � J Q, " � �/ I • , -• • , • • • 6 � > f � O i� • • ' ,�- ._ 1 . � • � � �C� • � / ��"- "/ • + �,.. _- . ' / � - --ti � --r --r. � � � !�� 9n.. � • t _ nt I / � �4' _ � % -�' /�;�. - �, � � �' • :� . �`� • .. •• -� e''� j;' t , j� � • t - � � . /�Mf' .I.-' =:� •�•.' �� ' � QP��(`-�� \' ' . I..st E"-��e _',/ � KE •K• . �.��I • .\ • /-•l _''` ` � � � _,? � � I ♦ � ^ \� /•_. Q. '/� /`• � JJ4 • . .. � � Q � � i�•/ ! �• _ r _ Q• • / � � i.� i a . •� � ' . . ' 3 . . � . • I / p�� • p.�' 7�/! l \ � � 1 � . • � Q � � • �/` • • • ` ,` . o . ... ; J' • I� ---- •• o{ f 3� I. W' � 1 • �` . �r a� . \ �� m �" • \. \ i •' i �p ^ � � fi � � � � • ., � i - � �--f--�--r t ' . -. P � ' ^ �1 1 • • 1 � � � • � q •!. • • j � i � I � ' ` ' APA . • �/ • � p • ' _ •� ;• ��• . ' � '- ' � � I - — J - -- � _— _ _ . � • ^ , _• 2!i 1r ' � ' '� . �— ' � ` ' _:2]21M ' - `o8+u+00r+E� ,, - - . _ � , � w w aN - � � : � -� • �4IEL CT WELI � 4 II ' ' O� � � - �ti � �� HAGSTROM-KING 4`. _ �� • ' I ': 22TW � /� .. �� PARK F'�ii.�.` ' - � • ' . ' � . � a . . . i� a . r l,-._ . �!�L�I � .� _ • - . . /','.i81-�' �� 1' \.' • � . .- � �: -' :�: 1 �_,,�,� izs � � QOAo SUBJECT PROPERTY � , � F � W \ ' � � / • O •O�OC � � � � � ~ Z f • -.— ¢ = � << _ �:�' �� '�p �'� - _ NORTH . , - �— M�12.0�"A-_�E.LC�.NJ -- n �� '��--�<� °� ;`q ` 'SCALE 1"=800' --- � � . � �. . = � � � . � . a. � • +�`' o' � � -.m � s � . i / c} a .•--- l t, . _ _�� `` •' 1 J ~f I � =i . . � , ��,,� � 1 • f - '� 1-�_ '�;WAY• �s�I , u ' � •' ' - - � �� '��=-: � � � :-. __ \ . r = � '.� \ � . \� � �v '- i '��. ' • � � �'. _ � � � ; : '..C�•:. � i �^� � .J `vt ;. r - — - — • .. � �–' `M �• •. _.. -- _ : � :: ___-- --_ _ - -_ ----�B�Ti€'-�ERYfbrT-� ---- ----- -------Y . - -••�-••- • i,-.� � .��%�•'�. : , • ,- , . _ '.` �. , � ' / i •.' : ' . : . . . . .. . .. . . . . • • _ . . . • . .: �:� . . . . . . . . _ _ - —� � .�' � _ . .. � ."' . • � .� - � I � ' . _ _, � .� � . i __-; �\ . ' �� . - � : � � � � ��\ I (/ � •, `. `:J� — . i �� _, i� � [ 1 � � � `l � � \ / ' ' ? Ba I � � �--�-''.r T p1 �- \ z -{. y I 7 / ? GOR�•G'�% � �� s� 9v � y � Ir \ �� \ 3 :t /' � � �`.� , .\ � / ;4 \ \/ \\ 4 , `�6;, < `�\ j / i2 � O 5 � � , v J ! � a 4/ � y`O �G � / ' � � i � I .'• � . •--- . _.—i- so - --- � -- -•-. ` �. . 7 . � °j1, '.Q ,s s i� � /e L ��. �h' °`i .s�, � �n ,. ., ,,, J''F�FC �r� � 0 / � �.��? 3 .:,, \?� r ��s "� �..72 _ Z� � 't i�� y�0 m � S. � ,s�, + � � 4 0 4 'J ,� �9 • • n ti �: o ., � m � � ti� 5 J'T �`9Q, ,\6 .�y19 202 45 J9 \ �0 � `}� \ q1 6 VN ^� S ti 3 0 ,_ �� p gb OI � �79 59 _. � �2 � p�� N J9 \\ � �(t�� m N 2 2p l : u� ,t`� � 262 P � '� •N 159 �9 _ 6�9 J�� \ 8 � ��o T 9 -� � V � � � o ti° � � \ e2 - o P�� a t 6�� i P 9 ,, � - m a� P 0 N D ��`\ �� J9 5' �, 4, o\2`y bz � �•e � ss � �� °60� ss � �9n \ � ti I 0 y \ , � 10 � �, I S � �► 9 m \ r,, ti J ry \ 3` \ ^f� .4 , �9 / N 8 � % ryy 1 O �J S? � 9 � �\ 5 �� B � Re, ��, „ � � �. ry J� F/ � 2S 5 • ,p a I 1 m �,~ :• Q � • �j,. f C� �,. � \ ,v a ` N � �, 8 ,,o � STONF� , '�ms \ �� r � \ - .;% ''°,_ . ,y �/3p :;2� CT i n � �� 6 ��^i '•r �' b O9 � � 7 O� i \ ?y n '° 7 �e e � � , 9 n 6 �n 6� � �' a 2T9.97 � � a .1 'l . � 0 62 16 � f'' . ♦ ` \Y, �y. O � 6' � ,♦ \ 206 '2 " \J 90 ��. ��9 'l'�3t 4 � O � ♦ t � �/ \ « �� 8293 � ��pGoo � °o� N � 6 `��\s zy � � �.,,z _�� 'y,�� h� ; 3 N 5 � �,� � 1� � h' o O o 'b 11 ♦ � 6 ) 7 � ' �� N �i�� 9 \ \ \��i9 �s 1 0 V � � R\ , `� �� y ^^ \ \ D'2 � 1 N � 14 � � " �o Z � \ � � � � �� ` ~ \ � 9� � /17B 13 "%� O a • �p0.46 ` — `� �B� ' \� *� a .a � � p 36.01 � � 10 � 69 � 09 � PARK S' .7 / � N p �36.�7 `I J tl`�\ � 1� , � N � 9`'�7 � � � e N 'V' �, � \ � / _ _ � 1 3 �� II w 3� -- 1 � � -� i 4r. t _' � " �. �2� � •� \� � e � �!y . p .v� QI� � � ol 1U� ^`♦ / f� 9 n / /�� j y �ti I f � 7 s '�Ja ��. ,1 0�'' I 2 N� 13 , // 91 I �1 5"_: � : '�� 0 ry I a \ , .. ' ' 3 ... 2 . o n � 1 ^ � ��. e.e �...� _ 1 \ r "•' ��` � 9e;� �i• � � \ g ' �� ` �� `o . \ \\ h ^b� �,?Od A�Lrypry / •� W B �S6 _2� Z' � `Z w ' ✓ « /� �J ,l Ory -Wa � '�� 's� :+.14.e0 14 � 'i� ` l� �\ 5 w (u ry� J � P `e � ^q / ?� y 3. � O�� M ,9'j • � 1, \� � �/ � �� 39 u 4 u ' � '' � l ` 3 � e � ' I` � � _ � 4 �. ^ .>: �8;50 � i' 15 � r � 1��. �� ?Qa � �•�f O6 `,i.�' j� 24 e ` SUBJECT PROPERTY` " ' � " � 16�. � 3 � oo*v y 3 tl V u T :��:::::`;:�:�:�:::.:.2 6�9 is.._... Q 5 b °' I6 0 ig - M '99 ?� �Cr ,� k0 ri �� E NORTH r:;:2�::::.:;:::::;?:::<::;:�:;;.>.:.'�:$ � �°� M` 101.�4 Z m �ee.es "� bk�::<':;•�:�:�'�: ��'�'� �'•:;2:'::; � i� n, g j; O N !0:{:;:;::::}�:tii;:;.i':;:;::=.ti:�.. \ � 3EE RE:.OaO v�Pi POR SCALE 1N�ZOO1 •::�+::;:`•.;.;;;;:::;� : 2 mo,ob 6 �� a� IT o HL�GS�ROht K�NG PARK �'' :�:��'1�1;9�:;�:;:;;:;�:; /O ..:��Z yA U _ s ��Se 66 175.0? 1l6.74 b_� _� 17i.97 o �". 4 i�e. sa m 1 �yh 1 • N .� 240 ��0.21 �9 �? N N I i A q N q wB ez � � $ ,; o N 19 ° �� HEIGZ40S 168.dE � ��0� 71.96 � ri �'i - � � = � 182.14 179 0� f p 194.�0 0 166 TT � ��9.2� � 1 s�HTS s��OAD ��.�� ie 4 � 0 240 104.10 IQ79 ., ...• �Q 149.t1 � 123_06 I' 242.44 -' - ��p � OUTLOT 8 0� 376.64 I � 192944 4 � I,_ OUT�OT A �0.6 f 1�40 3S - - 1611.37 r ---_I �0 I Du ane C. Sk a�` � 2491 Pond Circle, West Mendota Heights, MN 5512U . May 21, 1991 � City of Mendota Heights 11 p 1 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 5511 S Letter of Intent Proposed fence for 2491 Pond Circle, West To whom it may concern: The property on which fence is to be built had been cleared and graded at the time of the house's construction. Only two trees remain in this area tan oak anly SO% af the branches with Ieaves and a crabapple, approg. 10 ft. in height); these trees will be left undisturbed by fence construct'ron. � trees or brush will be cut or cleared in the canstruction of the fence. Significant improvements to the property have been made and are planned. I had sod laid in the area an May 11 and I have purchased sig trees (red maple, pin oak, linden and apple with heights ranging five ta twenty feet) and plan further purchases of trees according to plan developed by landscape designer. Iiefore purchasing home we were infarmed by the builder that there would be no difficulty in building a fence. The builder alsa stated that the park behind our hause would be a low use area. We were not informed of planned baseball fietd behind the house. The purpose of the fence is two fold: 1. Contain my children ( ages 5, 3, 1, and a child due in August) and deny them access io fhe pond. 2. Arotect my children from the activity on the bal! field. The proposed fence will be 5 feet in height made unobtrusive by using vinyl coated chain link with 1 1/4" links and knuckles on both top and bottom. The fence will be located a minimum of 6 inches inside the property line of 2491 Pond Circle W. Sincerely, �� Duane Skar As the owner of 2485 Pond Circle W. and the neighbor to 2491 Pond Circle W. , I have read the letter of intent for the fence and do not object to the proposed fence. �W � W i �l i c� '�o,,,,, �� C ity o� .,..1.� 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. "1 �' �� Date of A lication Fee Paid �� 1 ��iC'� � �29 Applicant Name: �� 1� �(,((,� V1P � PH: C(o �a)�, p g j—+�� (I.ast) (First) (Mn Address: a� Q I �v�d �.i rci e, (.c) . M e��t-cc ��c1�+s M It3 53'I�t (Number & Street) (City) (Zip) Owner Name: S t�U � 1� UQ ✓1 �– �_ � (Last) (F'ust) (1vII) Address: (Number & Street) (City) StreetLocation of Property in Question: � y�( �(� �► rG�� .�� ' Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property ;,:. Present Use _ Proposed Zoning of Property : Progosed Use Variance Subdivision Approval Weflands Permit Other (attach explanation) Section I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and the additionai material are true. � , (Signature of Applicant) (Date) l � (Received by - Title) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights,lViN • 55118 452 • 1850 �=� µ i1'�•ry 1.,,...,,y 6n.a2f' � fc= � .,r. 1 �� /'""".---._...._, ��, �.,.j�L. . �•"'y� r F r-r�. ' • � � �, ��"'� "� ', t�.,..ls ��/ . }' yi' R�� {. ) �'� �w ' ( � w,�""+i ht .. � �y �� '% ' S m�' . $ �."""'3 � � , � �� — . { -• i ....,� ,,,, . - l�)+��.K .._rMe,,, �r)"l' t a+.,:y� ��J t""`6Jt.+ _ � .� r7 ..p„� , �� A o..� � � =,�,u. .,�Y �. �a°° °� —� c y_�� ' � �,� �� er^1„ y...M' . • .,'' '�l�» 4•+�r��, �\ . Cf) t�p-�. ti�' �Zy "�'Y f� � ��-�`� ` vHn�:j � fj t l-• - �>. , 1�r . t.�'`+'`" ` `'�, � �1 �4'� Q-i�. � � � ;a ��. - : �� , �,� _ � . i � �� ,,' � � �~ , � � � �r��. � ��•�• 1 -�,, � S "� �~,., 'M� • f s�� t� � � �,, . ."--=-�� , J .i �j �,,r.*;�� 59 � .,. 1 �xt ��`" {i) �+�i�.{s.y1 .-r'"'i-'^� . n t� '�W � �`. ,. � / � t � . • . • `' . � � -1,"tr,) i►..jy � � ' �."'? �Il ,t/'�'-.�� _ , � � .-- . �� 'y' "��'� ' �ti�. „e , r++� ' '?•wt+. `N, . , . .' „r� �.., : •n-�,� �. .% _ r--� �w' p'i'!"�, �W ��'•"�t' �rv �' 1"*.i ` t-� E,.1t 1^�� l..trl It.�� T f�'"'n �. t � �„w � + ; � •...r..�! ( � �r � r••„, w,� � r+ `"►r•• r. , ��' � f a,�� ,' �^ � �.� ..� �` - -----______�� '�'--=�c�s f�-a � � ,r� �.t �"' c� �--,..d . � .. .._...—,. 5! .�l obN S 2� O J` 3 J\ 2� � _ .,.< :....:.........._.�,.�„ oo��g � ' � N 1 ` N� -� . -�_ .� 1 - 7 K i �� _ f��. ,.� �� ;� � � � � ? . ��'�� r a :; � ,� _ �°' � - - - • • _ ��. {s aa � n� � a, '� � � ; ~ � � �# d � � �-' o �.> � � au�7 y��a� �.� � �� y��: � �' `� � ' � - �' � .�� f� �� ~ � � ` � - —' 3.,OO,Sbo� ��C+�q �} .� .. � �j � � �-... _ pQ �9b�', - �-- (`�: aa 1 � �� °p�Sb i !� -- - -` o�,. - _ --�� 3„0 �'�9 .��w I I ,�J�o, � � � .. � �.1 .``� o u, Lb�' I / ` .. I °� z� � / � `� � : �;��a , /c�i � �p� I �i 1 �La - ��.�.-' � � �tP . �/yf %` � � �7 r. � t� �""'-- �a� !,p f 0�� t � �,1 �" �� :1 . o�� a�" � o� I�' Z / o� .� 4��, 1 . j oo. -.;� � � p0 L,� o� � � G► W 0 � a �'ti. '' �y �{ �;,- � �1 a } `z'��'' �-'-� U"�-, �1 � r b °i %'`� �� J"�Z �� `.� ; n �¢°, � ` r � �, ��N � f _ O/ /� ' � —�� . / ��\ , . a o b �o : � � � t ,.o �'1 � ,��a� c��% �`'�� ,�,� �\ i o v � 2� � � � `}oo / / O 4. o/ /i �'s ��•.... �.... , g�o ; -- • -eS'z�-..... �. _os: �. 9 ��.�; p I 1 �,a°,�``ww�� r��j j ti � -� �,,,, ; tr� ' - \.._:� �E 1 t ---- _ iu�. f.6�'a' �z < j� � f �� `?4'+`0��,i`O �° Q j� �. :?/1�l (�' /�,os �'' .3„ L�.L.�oZN � S� i��f�19�•, 8/i : �,,,• _ r� g~(�% /��(!I�' r � �f /� � �!`<. ---- -- ,� � ;., / s�6�p'>,. ..�' ��, -� �l,.�, o� � ' �Z`�L - u `t�> t � �d° 1 �� ,� �z„ °s��'Zi:d,. �7 '�� ; �d,�;.' j /; � � �if �.o:'� . p r" i — .� � . �9. � ' !'t � . 4�' �i � o'� � � �--:-- ; - _ : , ,6 y �. :; � bL�,Z, �j r,� w �_,'� �. N�N � ,,. ' : � �,;�, � 8`a ,� t,� b/ � j !/ S /�, �0 p �j � � � �y .y'!�i'� ` o� . '�.'`,��Q. �� /�ui w � ��; i � 1 'Y. :'�s �'' QQ `��. p� s6 sJ ��' ..-� � � ��; j,- 1 ! ' : � : �`� 5�,� `� � os�<-,� � f �� SL. � (Yj' 1 � � .•�• t � �.�r` OS'C�'�b r ��6�,�� ' � �i . rn N� r j i ��"' �'��2s ��,. ,'L� b��„ 9�s p '' �`SO �9� v � ` 9 - " Zs '�o�< . cY { .9g\�Ze J �i , - , Z � � ,. ,� � j; .:,�,vA�,' :.;i.? ,p',I,.:�,.. ; �"� � N.�, ,� . c� o `�,.~ � - : :. 6 . (J,9� �:• t�l O g` ., � � S,. , ,,( � �: �} � � � -. -. � "�� a N N �� .ti� �� .. K.a_:�•� �••: , . �O = i 'Y � � ' � c3 ° ��= �� , �.: . � 'f + 0 � � I I- ° '' � `' /`� �, 6� �.. _ �--� .��,�� 4,. ""�' • �+�Z ° !� °' ° N / / ��""X�, ��, D �`�yb/., � !V �' "`� i D � � �� W � ro � �° � j , o ��. � Cl/� - 1� ;�. Z 9 p J� ,�..S/� z 9 Q�,,,,\ tc , j �'�'' Q�s av� :-r ! ��,z � � l / 9� s o � � pz� �_cy,� ..�,,� � � � ; �►,,a�. '�j� � ,q'`, g� �� L,, � 1�jtr � � t11 �M u t?0��►oOr'a �` � / f�o � � f `5.,,,� d�, o ` �f t� L .� 'Z . � t�P ¢ � �00'C►O! � � Q�' � /v, � / � ' ~ � �•,, o �i . � , 1 ; .., . � f f�- � � l� 4 :} ,, �� Q . � I � � _...� � _ � � '1' � _ , / /rn : � i. � �iss �'E n r,0 _ C ity o� � - ....1.� 1Viendota I-�eights May 22, 1991 Mr. Duane Skar 2491 Pond Circle West Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Skar: Your application for a Aetlands Permit will be considered by`the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, May 28, 1991. The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.N�, here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ��'(lt'�— Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb � a.��;�:.�--y�� 1101. Victoria�� Curve ��1Viendota� Heights, 1ViN • v5118 °� 452• 1850 ��=. ="� � � �l.11.l May 30, 1991 Mr. Duane Skar 2491 Pond Circle West Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Skar: C ity o� 1Viendota Heights Your application for Aetlands Permit for a Fence will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended unanimously to approve your requested Wetlands Permit and to waive the public hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, c��. �3 _ Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb % � � ., , ;-, � � ° - . _. ,. - . � • ;,��:* - �� = ,�:. � :> =, • :a' , . _ ";.:.:i�� -,'- » � tid: • '3s ��£ y y�:¢�;�.f.i. ;� , � . .. .:'��1101 �. Victoria-::rCurve;' � 1Viendota�Heights;==�1ViN:,, ,55118 � .. n 4�2 �.1850 :, �° -w .� .. ' , � :ig.�; . . �� , . ' r, `. _.. .: � . . , . y _ ' - ' .., ' , -, ' .- . . ` °d:' .. .. ':'2' . . _ � . .. � . _ ... _ . ... . . • " ,. _ . . .' . . _ - o > + , . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 31, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini a r FROM: John P. Maczko Fire Chief SUBJECT: Equipment Charge Rates DISCUSSION• As you are aware, the department comes into situations where it bills out for its services and recoups expenses. Recoverable expense items are grass fires along railroads, hazardous materials incidents, and exptic cases where �te may bill because of an extraordinary effort. To my knowledge there has not been any formalized action taken, f�om a City perspective, enacting rates for personnel and equipment utilized. In the past the following rates have been used: Pumper Tanker Grass Rig Chief's Vehicle Personnel $150.00 per hour 55.00 per hour 55.00 per hour 45.00 per hour Varies based on actual response In doing a survey within Dakota County I have found that we are low in what we charge. I would like to recommend that the rates be higher to correspond to what other departments charge in Dakota County. Suggested rates should be: Pumper Tanker Equipment/Command Grass Rig Chief's Vehicle Personnel $200.00 per hour 150.00 per hour Vehicle 150.00 per hour 150.00 per hour 45.00 per hour Varies based on _• actual response I am not aware of any studies that have been done that specifically address equipment rates, however the rates seem to correlate to approximately 1� of the cost of the emergency vehicle. These costs within the County are also in line with the fees other metropolitan communities are charging. � )R� C ' '.. RECOMMENDATION• A formalized process via Council resolution would probably be the best way to address the fee issue because it would show that they have been approved and endorsed by the City Council. A resolution for Council consideration is attached and I recommend approval. ACTION REQUIRED: Should Council concur with my recommendation, a motion should be made to adopt Resolution No. 91- , RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FIRE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT USE FEES FOR SERVICE PROVIDED BY THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT. . a JPM:dfw City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 91- RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FIRE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT USE FEES FOR SERVICE PROVIDED BY THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights Fire Department provides primary fire suppression service to the Cities of Mendota Heights, Mendota, Lilydale, and Sunfish Lake; and WHEREAS, provision of this service requires a significant expenditure of public funds to protect the health, �' safety and welfare of the residents; and WHEREAS, certain types of calls for service entail extraordinary expenditures of time and effort by the Mendota Heights Fire Department; and WHEREAS, specific examples of such calls include, but are not limited to, grass fires adjacent to railroad right-of-way, hazardous material incidents, and any other type of emergency response deemed extraordinary by the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Mendota Heights deems it necessary and desirable to establish fire personnel and equipment usage fees for use in billing for extraordinary emergency response activities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, that the following rate schedule is adopted for service provided by the Mendota Heights Fire Department: • Pumper Tanker Equipment/Command Grass Rig Chief's Vehicle Personnel $200.00 per hour 150.00 per hour Vehicle 150.00 per hour 150.00 per hour 45.00 per hour Varies based on actual response BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the rate schedule shall be effective as of the date of adoption and shall remain in effect until such time as the Council may alter or modify the rate schedule. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 4th day of June, 1991. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk 4 � t. , ' 4 .. LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL June 4, 1991 Masonry Licenses Nelson, W.V.-Construction Skluzacek, R. & L.-Const., Inc. Gas Piping Licenses Falz, Paul-Company Palmer Service Electric General Licenses Anderson Roofing & Construction Arrow Sprinkler, Inc. B.T.L. Construction Centraire, Inc. Elite Builders, Inc. Hoyt Construction, Inc. Merle's Construction Co., Inc. Moser, M.J.-Const. . Orfield Designers & Builders Prestige Pools Heating & Air Conditioninq Licenses Blaine Htg., A/C, & Electric, Inc. Falz, Paul-Company Palmer Service Electric 9 � 8�.�ii�N�'�3iiititc� ;�L§��i-�sivi3�i'.E.R�fi+;`£,�r{,�"►'4�3$ki�r:�ri�&�`R.`3��i�1:��iaia3,.�4i�Li43t�'�'.'i `#h`�:�.�.�:�i June 4, 1991 TO: Magor and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: TotaS Claima $ 67,506 Significant CZaimc Iletro Waste Cormn monthlg charge 36,049 Peat Mazwick Audit 6,000 unusaal CZaime 0 7 , , Dept 10-Adm Dept 50-Rd & Bridge - � -- � 31 May 1�91 6/4/92 Clairns List 15-Engr 60=UtiZities F'age 1 • Fri 1@:58 AM City c�f Mendc�ta Heiohts 20-police 70-Parks ! 30-Fire 80-Planning " Ternp Check Nurn6er 1 40-CEO 85-Recycling . . 90-Animal "Contrbl - - - - - - -- -- - - -- � - --- - - Ternp. �� Check " - Number Vendc�r Narne Account Cade Carnrnents - Arnc��mt ----- - � - - - --' � 1 A T LC T 01-4210-110-10 ld c�lls 16.17 �� - -- 1 A T & T Q� 1-421 @-Q��@-20 1 d ca 11 s - --- ---- 5Q�. 25 -- -- - -_ � ._.._ ._. --. - - , 1 A T& T 01-421@-040-4Q� ld calls m.48 ,� ,.�;� 1 A T t4 T 05-421Q�-105-15 ld calls 1.78 t_ _ 1 A T & T @1-4i1@-@3�-3Q� ld calls _ ._- - -- +'--�8- -- - -• - ----�------- - ' - ----- '�, '' S 71. Q�6 � ' ' ---- -Totals Temp Check Number 1 - - - - .-_--._. ._._._ _.___.�- • -.--_ ---.- -__--_- _- `- , +�� 1t� •> � Ternp Check Number � ��= ' �c� --� - -�---------.�_...___ - -- - _ �_ ,. _ ._ . . .- ----_—_------------ --------------.___._� ;c; tzii , � Assr� c�f Recycling Managers 01-44@4-085-85 dues �0.00 :>�! � - ----- <�, : r,. - : �' ----- �- ---- �-- ----- • - - - - - -- - - - - - �- - - - � - ------ --__. __: @. Q�@ ---- -.._------------- �. '� � Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber � Y �;r� : c' ��, , � .. - - - ---- --------_-_ • � - . _ --- �.. _. ._�=� ;aa; Ternp•Check--Nurnber-...- •- - - � - - - -._ . _- ---- --- ---- •-- - - ��e� 0 "3� � E�rl F Andersc�r� & Assac 01-4420-�5@-50 splys 147.85 �� (�,,_.-_3-Earl--F Anderscm & Assc�c --- _- . Q�1-4420-Q�.:,@-5@- •------- - _. ..- -sP1Ys -- - - -• -- :,,� 6 a �' 'ss;----�Tot�ds-�'emP-Check-Nurnber-_ . ---3 - -- --------._____..._ __.____�_- --------- ------ _. _ _._.._ ',,�� Ternp Check Nurnber 4 � a�' ---- --- _ ..__.. �,�,�F 4 AT&T 01-4210-050-50 Jun svc 3`� 4 AT&T Q�1-4210-070-70 Jun svc __�-----�---4 AT&T-----•---_ _- - -- --� 15-4�1@-@6@-60-_...__-_---- --- -�-- --- - Jun svc --- - ------- '3n! __ `' 1 � ��E� �-; �utals-Temp-GMeek-Nurnber= -------- --. r+_ -._._-__,�__��___.__-----_-- -..-- .-----.-----. __ _ �_.. i� �' �e� ?39: Ternp Check Number 5 �-,- -- ---._.-.___�. �---- --------- --•---- --_—_�._.._----•-- -------------- ----- '40' �4t� 5 Rdvar�ce Shoring 09-446�-@00-0� Re 8'3-6 I� ��z. , .— J ' —_"" �'__'_'_. �_ �.. ;4,i ' .. __"_"_'_'_"____._._______._____" •a�� Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber 5 � � � ,14 ' Temp-Gheck-Number--�--------- --•6._. _. ._ __ _.-_.-__.�...__._,..�.W-----�__-,--•-_----.-..-----..__,______.... «I 6 Rlbirison @5-4330-49@-15 splys 1�� 6 ---------------_.��_W� ------__----__------- ° �Tat�ls Ternp Check Number 5 �� Ternp Check Number 7 -E{ar�k----�8-42e6=Q�@Q� =@0 . _------------ -___....____..___._ - --..-_. ._. ..-. .� __. ... , _ s � 31 May 1991 Clairns List � Fri 10:58 AM City c�f Mendc�t� Heights Temp Check N�unber 7 Ternp. " Check --Number-Veridor Name Accaur�t Cc�de Cornrnents - 5� 7 Arnericar� Natianal Far�k 13-4226-0@0-@0 bc�nd fees c� -- -------- ----- �? 14 6 Tctals Terop Check N�vnber 7 � _""'"' ..._""'....' ... ' ' _" '�� Ternp Check N�anber 8 .,;------- 8 Aristosc�ft Inc 01-4301-iiQ+-10 sw i" 8 ��-�---Tc�tal�-�'ernp CMeck Numher- ---- ----•8-� _ --- --- -•--- �- - --- - - - - - - - --- ,7G� {'''! Temp Check N�unber 9 11 s� �'3� ` 9 Ecills 6uris Shap Q�1-4305-@20-20 splys ��"+ 9 Bills 6uns Shop 01-43�C5-02Q�-20 splys , �i: �--�,�---"— --�- --- -- • - - — -- - — - -- -- - - -- --- -- -- — z;.; 18 - - - � ------------ - - - ,s3� Tot�ls Ternp Check Nurnber � ��4 '___^___"._ '"'_' __'_ " ' _"_ _ _' " _'_" "_ , .. .. "_'"' _ ��i Ternp Check Number 1Q� � �,�� i � ,_8 1'Q�-Ffare'Fc�at-6rass----------�- ---01-4335-315-3Q�-�---____----..-- --.-.-----lawn care-'-------- ''�,�i 10 � ' Tot,33s Ternp--Check - Nurnber -- -- - - -1 Q� ---- ------------- � -- - - •-- ---- ---- --•-�- -- - ----__.__�__ l�� . � �'i Temp Check Number S1 �33; "' ._`_ '_."'_ '_' '_" "'_" "_'______._ "' _' ____'__ _� _"�'___ _' _' "_' _"��."_'..��. I34; � 3,t S1 Kevir� Patchelder Q1-44fi0-1i@-10 exp reimb MCMA ccrr�f 1 _�I -- � � 1 ��_��_ �.,----- - -------------- - -•- - -_ _----- __._ --- - -------------- 37i 3a. Tatals Temp Check Nurnber 11 j40�emp-Bheck-Numbew--------3�------ ---_�-•-•--------•------- .._-------- ------------- 4,; �s:! 12 Beacar� SpCrts F�raducts Inc @1-43@5-Q�7Q-70 splys - - - -- - -- --• - -- -�-- ------- -- -- - --- - - - -- - ----- - i'3� .__`_.12 __.� �-- --- ---- - -- - --- - ----- -_.. .�------ �4' �45j Tc�tals Ternp Check Nurnber 12 � � � Ternp Check Nurnber 13 �3-P-0-E-{3rnarnenta3--3rcn-INc--.---@�-446Q�-Q�00-4�0� -------.------Re-89-6-i-2 ,� T13 " ---It?�ai-s-��rnp�-Cheek-•Ni�mber 1-3- __�__,��__.�----- �.� Temp Check Nurnber 14 14 Budget Lighting Inc 01-440@-109-Q�9 splys _'""^_'_._-.-�__._ __ . %�"'..a.y-��"�_.-_. _. ._ _.�_�_�,-�.-",....' _ _ ' ' .. _ �._. -----�-- -----__-_---- ---- -------- .. F'aoe C -----�-� �.. (� ' - --- --------. ._. _. _ _. _ _ _._ � .— ----- i q-1 �3' .. �--- -- - - -•-� Amaunt -----_ ____ --- -----_- •- ! �_i ��: f°t"? 110.0� 7 � ------ -_._.___ � - - -..,-- ----- ---------------- �,� 4@ i. 17 �, c" ,.,,� a, � �7; "' .__'_._...__ "__� �""" _�"'__'_"—"'...._i13 �15�.i . .�__�_207.50 - -�._.�____------------ � ------ ,ie� �.Q�%. J� `t3 � 20I ---------- - _ _-- z� ''3� . �?4� � .�. __� 5 i J8. JQ� � . I2Gi . �,�. �Fj �27 ze� � ---•----'181. �6----- -� --.-.___�. —._ ____..� .� ��2 �33f 34: } 1��I. ___' __ 137: _'�__� E e i 136. Q�Q� ao) �. � 'ai �a2 i4�i ' _T� �S�I 168. 50 !as� ------ 47 - 168.-JQ� �e 49' so ,. •� �51 ' (sz 3 �1 3, 02 ss s - ---^-- s� 3. @2 �sa� ;59 60 ei 'ez` G3 i��6��i-�-Q�Q! 64 65 ` ________ 66 1, 6�1. @0 67 68 fi9 70 �, �s 73 75. 08 , �a _____ ' ' . 76 �� 7 " ..- ^"' ' _' ' _ 'u 31 May 1391 Claims List Fri SQ:59 AM City. c�f Mer�dc�ta Heighbs Ternp Check Nurnber 14 ' Tetnp. Check - Number Vendor Name Accc�unt Cade Cc�mmer�ts 7Gtais Ternp Check N�unber 24 , Terap Check Nurnber f 5 ---- 15 Capy Du{alicating Praducts @1-k3@5-@70-7� -- May svc � i5 --- --Tc�tals-Temp Check N�vnber 15 - • --• - - - � Ternp Check Nurnber 16 • F�age 3 - -. Amount . ._ ._ 9. 32 _ , 9. 3� ,.. ! :�. �� c _ ..r ,? - --- -- --....__.__ _____..y .4', � �� . -- . _ _ _ .. .. _;,:. l5n� ^-x •t; t _- - ---�._.. ,. � . tie, - , :zf; {``r ; 16 Dakota Gc�unty�Cc�mrnc�ns Critr ¢�9-4490-@0�-0Qt m�ps ." __ ... _ ..._._.__.,„ __..Y�� .__._._____ _---.._ '4'., , __ '° 0 id0 16 ---_...�__. ..._ _----. .... ._ _. _. .. .. . _ _ _ _ _ .-- ------ -., . __ _._,_-- + ._.__... __�.»1"i --~- - --_ __ -__ _ _.� _--- - - - -- - - - - - - -- �- ---� - � ._._ ''� Tc�tals Tem Check Number 16 '`e� : : �: #,•r. . '�.t .=:..._.'fernp Check---Number:------- • 17_._._ ._. ._ . _ . ..__ _.__ _......_____.___.._._W.. .�...._____._____... .-�,_..-..�;=E.� """_v'__"'__._....,._�_._..,.r__...u..�-_... _ __ ;29� , �3�JI `� 17 .Tarnes Dar�ielsars t1{5-4415-iQ+5-l.s 3e.tr� aI lc�w 1�'�. �+� j?3; ' t�; , ------ !-,---`-_ ____�__ __....__._._.__. ---.- -_ _ __. ._..._�_�_.��_.___.._. ._---------------•----...---_._._------. ---._ . ___ _ ..______..__u..___._..�___..�._____---__..»__� •:i3� <5� �% %iQ�. Q�Q� '2<� e: Tcst�ls Ternp Check lVutatser I7 #� :7� —'_......_'___....�_..+_......_�_....,._._._.�._._ _._.. ___ ...,.__ ......�___..._.�__._ ,__.__.�...'___ ...... '_' .,. _.,_ . . _...___ .. _ .. ....."'�'........'.r'_....__.—.._ _ _ ........,._��......J__._..... '__' �"&� Temp Check N�vnber 18 za. .30;` .___---a..8--�i?i-sea�m-�c�f--Mir�r, Ir,c ----____.___._.._._,Q+1-433�-4.�-,Y�-3�t1_____.._-----, ---------------r.prs ------ -. .. ._._. _�__. "'' 18 Di�cc�m c�f Mirrr� Ir�c 01-k330-440-��t rprs 3.^.� '33 � f--`___�"'.�+(-j_-___�_._�___..�__....._. _ ___..__......__.__ .___��_..._-..... ___"_.._-_......_-. .__..__""'_._'__'..._..__ _'...._. . ._..____.-_ �'S� Totals Temp Check Nurnber 18 i" � �'�-�`-��rn -Gheck-Nisrnber---_.__�g......�__�_.._--- ---r_�r._�.-._.__�------- -_._ _ _�____.._._-� ,7, R r .`pt 19 Der�r�is Delrnarit � 01-441.�i-�2Qt+�r� _.w.�.._..._--__.._.�_', Jur��ailaw ._____�_,_._�._._ .;a� .._, � �_-�_.._. __---_--- • ----• - ----- --- "� 7atals Ternp Check Nurnber 19 <z __..,..___�__._. �._....•---------._�.r----__....___._. ___ __.�._.____� r43 ---.______,________.___._ _____..... ___..._.�___.__._--___ __ 44! Temp Check Nurnber 20 I�� =-; Q�-I}c�dd-�'echniaal=Cgrp---.-______._-�t#-433@ 1t90-iQt-_ �_._._., __,----- prtr--�tcn----_._._�__.._._.�_._ � _� -- .:,, ; � �� [�er.__- — Tr.}.�I_�_.Tarnn__t"i-�nr�.L_3�F::rnt�a�—_�.—_____vr+fJi� --�.____�_...�_.r_._.....,.,_�_.��....,.,..._...______'__�_._._..__�...._..._.__ Temp Check Number 21 ___ _ 21 Ernpire Rebar Ir�c � iotals Terap Check Nurnber 09-445Q�-fi4�Q�-00 `rc 2 iie 89-6 I � -�._--�49.-9PJ. �.... 431. 0@ .._. �_�-��Q�. �QI.._ ...,. 1:�0. Q+0 1 �0. 0Q1 s4a.@0 SQ+. Q�Q� zv �� 31 May 1991 Clairns List Fri 1@:59 RM City of Mendc�ta Heights � Ternp Check N�unber L� � Ternp. ' Check -_- N�un4er Vendor- Narne - Accc�unt Cc,de Cc�mrnents - - �I 2� Fieldstc�ne Cabiner�try Inc Q�1-4131-0��1-�� June Re G�rlc�ck '_'----•— -- - -'- - --�------� -•--- ' � � `� _. _ _ .- --- --- - - - - �' Totals Temp Check Nurnber �L ^ ... - - - - - - - - Temp Check N�unber 23 --�3 First -Interstate Bar�k Trustee 01-2071 -- Jur� prern �4i 23 First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-413�-Q�20-2@ Ji�r� prern i 23 First Interstate E+ank Trustee @1-4132-05Q�-50 Jun prern -=--------•------ .., �__. ---- __ ... -- -- --- --- --- - - .. �.c•} 69 � - - --- - --- — - --- •- --- �'�I Tc�tais Ternp Check Nurn6er �3 ^r, •-f------- --. ..._ -- `--•- • - - -- - --• •- -- - - ---- - - - :�� Ternp Check N�unber �4 �.�� !-2� --84-Gc� 1 dst e i r� -R� - P 1 a i r---_ �.-_ _ -.. . • - 01-4300-020-2� - -- - -- - sp 1 ys.-- __ _ - -.- -- ----- `' 24 :ci =--T�tals-Ternp-Check-Ntunber---- - 24 - ---- — •--- --- --- � - -�---- - ��i Ternp Check N�unber 25 cs---- --- -- ---._._- _ � _ -------- -�-__.__.----- - ----_ �- ---____.------ �� 25 6c�adyear Camrnl Tire 01-4330-46Q�-30 rprs ,�_j,� -- !-._;�� ___. _�__ _ �"J,.�_"_. _"_'"'".' ' ' ' "' '...._ ._....._._�_�_....."'_"__'. _ ._.._...__.._._.�. ..""____ __._.. ��K Tc,tals Ternp Check Nurnber �S ��. �33� ,�4; Temp-Check-N�unber---------- �6----- _. _ .__��..T.-------- ._ ._._--- •------------ :-, i I_�I 26 Hdwe Har�k @1-4305-Q�34�-�0 solys .=�=tb-Hdwe-Fiar�k- -, .__ ---�----•-- -01=4305-@3@=3@--- ----�--SPlYs-- '+� 26 Hdwe Hank Q�1-43Q�5-03Q-3� splys as: i4p� --�8 - -.�.___-- --- ----•�---- -•- - � �_ �. __-___ __._—T_.� _�—..�� 41� Tatals Temp Check N�unber �6 t ; �a� 4 ,-Temp -Eheck--N�imber - -•---- • 27- - - -- ----- -- -- -•-----_ . _-------- - .�-_�-_ i ! 4�1 �7 I C M A R T Q1-�07e 5/17 p�yrall ,�� e7 I-G-M-A—R T-- -----.-.-_-Q�3-4134-110-30• —5/i-7-payrc�ll t i -- a; !,,e 54 (49j ;—�'-c�t�3-s-�-emp-�Gheck-Niunber_____._.._�-_�7- --- ---- — 5oI Ternp Check Nurnber 28 57 � GZ 28 F'aul Kaiser +�J 01-4268-15Q�-30 W`�� May svc � s3 28 P�ul K�iser 01-441:,-030-30 exp reirnb 64 65 56 j�,l Totals Ternp Check Number 28 _. ..-----� -------•-�---- -F�ge 4 ---- ------� --- �� I 1� -- ---- -- -� - ----• -------- i i l �" �° � 3� - -Amc�unt �-•--------•- ---•--- ----- ='^! ' r ' -. 78. c�Q� i'I � ----- �_. _.-• ------ --�._�_.� _ : FJ f9 %8. nLQ� t7t:'.ro ,�, • i�� ----------- - -_._.-�-_ _i'>. � 1 �i' �. 1��,� 15�.-24----.� .___.._. 83. 31 4�.53 285. 08 1-3_@0 -- 13. 00 �5.6�c ----- ---�s.-s¢+— --�fJB 8. 08 175.7� 267. @4 1, 450. 80 77.@@ 1, 527. 8Q� r 1 1 31 May 1�91 Clairns List � Fri 10:5� AM City c�f Mendota Heights Ternp Check Nurnber 29 Ternp. Check ,R Number Vendor N�rne Account Code -- � �9 Knutsc�n Rubbish Service 08-433�-0@0-Q�@ . . `� �... . _ Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 29 r Temp Check Num6er 30 -- -30--�hvmas Kriut#� • 72-4415-835-@0 . ' 3Q� ThGrnas K»uth 09-4415-000-@� 30 Thornas Kn�ith 33-441:,-841-0� ----- 3@ Tharnas Knuth - - - - - 36-441-�-843-00 -- - - -.__ . "�: 3� Thornas Knuth @5-4415-SQ��-15 . , --- � pl .�,-- --• 15@---• -----•-------- -- - • - -- ---.__-•�.�--� _____---- --- -- - � 'i�, Tatals. Temp Check N�vnber 30 t � z7- Ternp_Check�-Nurnber:-_._. _ - _31 _. . -- - ----------- _.�.----.. .�__. __ .. F�age � Cc�rnrnents - Arno��nt Mav svc 59. 83 � % ' � ' " , _`. J�. 8J '. ._' "' ' ' ' _ _ �T rni reirnb rni reirnb rni reirnb mi reimb Jun ailc�w !.,I 31 Krerner Spring & Aligr� 01-43�0-46Q�-30 rprs 22�5 i_-_---- —^�.�.-------. `..--- • �-- -- ---- - --- -- --- - -- - - . -- „�j �S ;27� Tc,tals Ternp Check Nurnber 31 ,-;__ ,�.__.__--•-- __.._.. --•-- -• --•-------------_ -----•---� - -_ _ _ _-- '�s� Temp Check N�unber 32 '! :30� s�i ---„�-L-E-•L--S�_.r.____.. __. -..___._ -_� @1-;�Q�75----------._�..- --- -- _Jun d��es - ---- 22� 3� � :- Tc�tal-s-�ernp-Check--N�irnber--- -�- ----- ��•----------- ---�_..�__.--------- _ - ----- ,�. - �- I `�� Ternp Check Number 33 i� 33 League of MN Cities i�_.`�-Q�1-2074��-- T----. ""`_..__ . Jun prem� -�---•- I`o! 33 League c�f MN Cities @1-4131-02@-�0 Jun prern i�c' _ 66 — r____ .�. ..___.___.�_,�__ _._�-- ------- -.�_.__�._._,__.__.. ,-- 4� ;.�� Tot�ls Ternp Check N�unber 33 t.`_�.�------- -- •..-- --_ ___ ._-------------•-�.___�_----- ---- ------- - - -- -- • - f�4� Ternp Check Number 34 `s� 4�-L-a e ii i�st-Gc r- �d6 __ 9 j'9 P•------------- ---�8�4335-00Q�-Q�O-�__._._.._��•---- -----•Jun - svc --___._._ �`'I �4 'ae� I- ' -T-c#.a1s-�'ernp•--Check-Nurnber-_-_____�,s4 -.-�--..___.,._._`-__.____,.__.�_._�_�_. IG� ' iSol Ternp ,Check Number 35 61 53� �S M Thc�rnas Lawell @1-4415-110-SQ� Jun allaw ! 35 M Thc�rnas Lawell 01-4400-10'3-Q�9 �_- — exp reimb �54� .sS-M-Ttsom�s-Lawel-l— -01.�►4Q�@=.11@.--1.0 _-exp-rPimb Ib6h I � ' ' _"'.. __��..�.�._.� " '_ _ �. .,_-_., _- _ _ __ �.__.....�_ " ' " _ . - _ .. _ . _ ' S ' _ - b - - - --- 56. 65 --.. - JJ. J�J 48. 4@ . .. � __ _ _ 19. 5� _ _ __�,.. 10. �0 - _ .__..__ _. � _ 19Q�. 12 . - -- • ---- � 1, 981. 50 _ _._.---1�981.50-- _� __�__ .y _. _-�.�:.�Qi. lli0.- �JQ�. L(iQ� 357. 01 ' � 813. �7 1, 17Qi. 28 � �-- -�•-•�.- —8��-bq��_�_� 82. 6Q� �%v. Q�Q� J1. JJ —�QB.��^.�.- — f 31 May 1991 Clairns List Fri 1@:59 AM City c�f Mendc�ta Heights ' Ternp Check N�unber 35 � Temp: -` - - • - - --_ _ - - - - - --- - - Check : Nurnber VendCr - Narne - Accc�unt Cc�de - --- � - � _35 M Tharn�s Lawell 01-43@0-11@-l�h J' 140 ` Tctals Ternp Check Nurnber 35 �' Ternp Check N�unber 36 � ---36-Marr�iatt - - -- 01-440@-iQ�9-@'3 :c' -- � 36 �L t�' -Tc�tals-Ternp�Check-Number - - --- 36- .-___._.�---__-�-------. -_. �F° Temp Check Nurnber 37 - - - Ccanrnerits _ exp reirnb wkshp - �� 37 Mir�nesc�ta Celiular Tele Ca Q1-4330-44@-20 V1 � rnotrile phone � ��--•- �7--._____------•---- - __.. - - ------___.___.-____------- ----..�--� - Z�; Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber 37 ;a _Ternp-Check Nurn6er_._---- - 38 - -. .. --------- ---------._. _. _ _ ._i 38 Metra Waste Contral 15-4449-060-60 �_.:-----38-MetrG-Wast�-�CGntrc�l � -- ._._ .._. _-----17-3575-•- -•--_._---. 76 .- • __` F'age 6----� --- - - -'�'I t I �, . _ „-., ,. .._ ._..----Amaunt --• -------__--_ _ _...- '� � ic 7.31 }3� , ____..—'_______._._.. .� _ _. __ __ ._____ j9 � 4�'_�. 58 ,�c �.,t. i ._+__.__---------�-- --. ___-- •------ ---- ��:�' +' °� �-, 'r - -- �89. 74-- --__- - - - •------- -- - -- • ,�: ------ ; s' 289. 74 ' � T ` � �zc; _ ------ ----------- 'zi� I- I24�' • -- 174. @0 ._._�_.__-.��_.�_.-�ze' t ------ ?' j �_. _� �_174: @0 --- - - �_._....�-- -----Y.� Jun svc 38, 845. 08 Ji�n-svc ----�_------ -- ---�,r-7�6Y-nc8cr--- . 36, 04'3. Q�0 `+ -- Tot�ls-Temp Check � N�unber - -- e8 ---------.---- ---___--- - -- ---_..- ---- .- ---- - - ---- ��.� Ternp Check IV�unber 39 .�a�.__ __._ �___._._ �._ . ---_ __-------------- ---- ' 39 Midwest Rusiness F�raducts i:,-43@0-060-60 i�J: 3� Midwest Rusiness F�rc�ducts Q�J-�FJQ�O-SQ�J�SJ i;-+-3'3-M i-dwest-L�us i ness- F'rGd uct s----Q� 1-43�10=Q�8Q�-8@.------------ 13�1 39 Midwest busir�ess Praducts �tl-43Q�0-liQ�-iQ� �`3� �� :« ��6— -�_.__._ ----- --�-�f�------ ��,� Totals Ternp Check Number 39 �+ i�z�-Ternp-�heek--Niirnber- -.40 _. . . .._—_� --- --- --...... ._.--- c� , ; I4�1 40 Minn Cellular Tele Ca @1-4200-610-2Q� � 0-Mir,r�-Ge31-�td:-ar Te3e�Go-- --�3-4��0-6i�-�Q+ +�� 40 Minn Celiular Tele Ca @1-4�0@-61@-3� 1:1 --- �..e — , �m 49 , --- so� Tc�tals Ternp Check Nurnber 40 I5tI - __ _ ._ 41 Mirmesata Ccnway 41 � Totals Ternp Check N��rnber 01-43@5-@30-30 41 ` splys 6. 8Q� splys 36.30 -- so 1.Y5�------- �6.,:.0 sp l ys 77. 6Q� ---�--____�._.._----.----- - 1:��,��0 May svc May-svc -- May svc svc call 7. 05 �f� 6. 75 77. �Q� 77. 5Q� +.�..�._�_. _... �_ "' �_ �._ . . _ _' " ' ' _ ' _ " ' _ '_" '�..-- __ " 4 ��o� ` 41, i �'� 31 May 19'�1 Clairns List � Fri 1�:59 AM City af Mer�data Heights Temp Check N�unber 4� ' Ternp. ' Check a - Nurnber Ver�dor Name Accc�unt Cc�de Carnrnents yr, 4� Murr ��lurnbing Q�-445flJ-2��i0-�CQ� Re 83-6F 4� �, T�tala iernp Check Nurnber 4� '�i._ - - - - - - - - Terop Check Number 4s �`• --��p3 Natior,al Vol�,tnteer Fire Counci 01-4404-Q�30-30 rnbrshp dues �f 43 r'��--•--Tc�t�l��-Temp-Check Number - 43 - - - ---� - ------ - - � - x"� Terop Check N��mber 44 �4 ._._.__._.___.._._ ..�____. - _ .._...--- •- -----�------ �• -�- ��G� 44 Naticmal Serninars Graup Q�1-44@0-02Q-�0 7/�9 semina 2C; ' �'_' ---- 44-_.. _._._........ --.. ._.. __...� - - - _ _.___..._._�- - -._.._ ._ . __ -- z: r�- �� TGtals Temp Check N�unber 44 ,�4�-Temp-Check-�Number.___- ---. .__ kg �.. ,. _ ._.�,___.._-- _____--. � . _ . .__ - - �" 45 ltiic<rtherr� Siate Fawer 0f-4�11-3�+Qt-�� hlay svc {_:f�_____..__�._�.__.___..,_�.:_._�_._._.___ ._---._ _.. .�---__�_._.._--- _...___.--•-.---. -- --.- ---.._._ .._.. _._... . ._. ..c� 45 €;�� 7crtals Temp Check Nurnber �r:, !3'i Ternp Check N�unber_.....�_T_.._.�6 .- ---.._.._ _.,_____...,....._ --.._—_._._. �. _._ - - - - -_ �as� ��46-N�+rthersr� • Air�._Ccr .___. __ �. _ Qs8-4335-c�Q��i-�Q� --- .�--- --- - - svc cal l p - -- -___ 3Q� 46 Ncmtherri Air Gc�rp 08-k335--Q�00-k�0 svc call : � �`'4 46 Nc�rthern Air Ccmp 08-4335-@0Q-0� svc call j_`2 " r "'"'_.. '_'M....�_.._..,,_. ...." ` _'"'«.._.. _.�.._�_..._.._.—.._,._...�..____....__ _" "'"" "' " "" ""_.. , i" 138 +`�� Tvtals Ternp Check Number 46 s�. _�__�--._..,__._�...��_�_._.._` _.._..�_�.-_.__.._...�__---- ------�-- ��°� Ternp Check Number 47 �Gi� r nx� l-�t----4� -tiakcr-est�-Kennels-..__--_------- -- Qe1-42�1-8Q�tc�-9Q�_.___ _.----._.------ _- -- _- - i'�lay svc - --. ___., _. _-- �4j 47 Oakcrest Kenneis Q�1-4�25-8Q�0-90 May svc Ikgi It . �QG_'""_� . � ..,.....�.—_...�.___...______ �_.__...._.�._._._�_.._._—___.._.�_� ._.. ' "...'_'__ "_,..'""._, ,__� Tct al s iemp Check N�vnber 47 48 Oxygen Service Ca k8=0x�-ger�-..'�-�erN-sca-Ca 96 Ternp Check Number 49 Q�g"'Lt33J"'��—�� act �hru 5/15 ?c-t-thru-5l3S Page 7 ArncG�nt , ` � ... 95. 5+21 � _ _.... - - "'36. SQ� :' �va ' . , -� „ ... ._ ... _ _ �J. Q�Qi ... ___,— _ .. ----- � :=5. �QJ �.s _ .. ..W .. .... ._ _ ._.- - - ----=''�, :�'�� - - -. _._�__ 39�. @Q� - - �_ � ae! , ._____.... '17� _ ' _ _,. ..___ ,Sgi�. Qif1L ' " ._ '..» �'_' _ _�'....— .:fr - .._ .---.____---•---_.. _ ._ ___.,_. __._._ __--.�-'4� 38�. 58 {sa _e —_._. _� _.._.__--.�80. 58 _._ _._.._. _—_...._ ^A' `3g; • :: __. _..---_____._______.�.._ _ _.. ___._..._._._- .--- - _......._ ,___— � c. �e�', iq,i _ _ .. �.-- ECIt.�Q�..._-_ _ ..._ _. _�_ __ ---'G`•.. ;<_' u�'Ji'�t�. J� ?4G� J6Q�. Q�QI {.. 4'., �_. _�._..._._. 742. 50 ---._. .__..____�....�_-- :'y' ;�o� , ;'"; '� 31 May 1'391 Clairns List Fri 10:59 AM City af Mer�dc�ta Heights Ternp Check Nurnber----- , -4� - - ----------.`_`�_._..--,----- -- -- - - - •- - - - - ' Temp. � Check -- N�_�mber Vendcm Name - - - Acca�rr�t Cc�de -- •- - Cc�rnrnents • � 49 Re�t M�rwick Main & Cc� Q�1-42LQ-130-10 Re audit -=------4�•°Reat Marwick-Main & Co-- -- - 05-422Q�-130-15.-�_-- -- .. . •-------Re audit -- - 7 4'3 Peat Marwick M�in & Cc� 15-42�0-130-60 Re aiidit '` 49 Reat Marwick Main & Cc� 03-42�0-13@-0Q� audit .�-- - 43 F�eat -Marwick M�in & Cc�-- - 10-422@-i30-00 -�-- -- - - - - - audit • - -- •- ---- � 4'3 F�eat Marwick Main & Ca 21-4��0-13nc-00 audit � 4� F�eat Marwick Main & Cc� 14-4220-13�C-00 audit '�, ----49-��eat-M�rwick Main & Cc� -16-422@-130-�0 -- audit - �4 S�C '=—Tatals-Ternp..Check-N�un6er-__..�_....--- �9---------------I---- �- --- _ ..__.-- ----- ------- I6� :"i Ternp Check Nurnber :,@ :r �:�� 50 S& T Office Rroducts T @1-43@0-@�0-20 splys zi___.,5@-----------...._--•._... �_--.___ _�____._-_----�----. ----- -- --- --_.-- -.. _------ ='i Tc�tals Temp Check Nurnber 50 'S� --- - �- - --- __. --- ------ F'age 8 - . ------� i i .. _ .--Amount -- -- ------- - - -- - - - —��, 592. Q�Qi ` --1+62. 0� -- _- -� --- - --- -'- --' -- --- i e � �}Q�B. Q�Q� �M1G �•. 4Q�8. 0@ _-_--._• 136. 00 ..._.---.^ _...---..._._. _ -------�: 138. �t@ 576. rd0 ;�s -----1.278. Qi0 - -- - - --- - - - - - '�' � 77; __�_�� i S' 6, QiQiQi. E1Qi i�� --•-----•-----�__._._�_._�.._.____._, i`z; � 4� __---------.__ ._.`. ---'---'-----�--f , as. 7. Qi7 + 'ze� . ---- , i?�� .�--- 7: @7 --�_ ,.�- - - ----�-•----c 73' i�C� ��;-- Temp..Gheck N�unber --- -- -- .,1 - --_ ... _ � - _.� ..-------- - - - - - _. _ ... - ----------.�__ ._,...- -- - i�� 51 L E Shaughnessy Jr 01-4��0-13� iQ� May svc 1,606.00 -�--�h--L--E-Sha�aghnessy--Jr . --_-.-,.Q�5-4��Q+-1�3�-d:,--------------------May-svc ------._.- —164,.�Q+ : 7. 51 L E Shaughr�essy Jr 15-4�e0-132-6Q� May svc �6�.@@ •,�o �1 L E Sh�ughnessy Jr Q�3-42�Q�-132-0Q May svc 147. Q�@ s�- 'S1-L-E-�Shattghr�essy-Jr-----•-------21-4220-1•32-Q+Q+.-.---------- -.�_- May-svc.-.-�._.�_------------ 1-9b.-+�@ r 51 L E Shaughnessy Jr 14-4�2Q-13�-00 M�y svc 1�34�.0�t "I 51 L E Shaughnessy Jr 16-42�0-132-Q�0 May svc 364.Q�Q� 33' �".«_ '_._____.._'—__�_._._.'__'�_.'.'—.�' ._ '_'_'_..� —_'.___ "___. '__.'._ '_'_.__.__"_ _ '_.__ �_"__`.�' _ _.____'__�____ + .:� 357 4, 088. @Q !��, Tatals Temp Check Number 51 ,3; _ �__ .��.__�_._.-___.__..___.�_ ___'_,__-_.-.-'_'— _ __'_'_._.__'_' ' .__,,.�._ ' + Ternp Check N�imber �2 38 • ,'�; r--- �2-Shade-ir�-a-Day___...__�___ ib-4460-00Q+-00------------- -_.-tree--remavad - i4�� 52 Snade in a Day 09-4460-000-@� tree rerncrval 1 ___ �� : �-;---1Qi4 ---___._�.---___.._._.__...--- ------------ ---•---------- '--------- !��3) Tctals Temp Check Nurnber 5� 53 J L Shieley Co 01-44�2-@70-7�c J3 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 53 Ternp Check Nurnber 54 rec r�ck r,stal-l-cpit-be, .__ ._ ..__ _,..�.�y31 �3 .i � 6 / &� 33I �� 40i __.._.__'� '4, i4�� (4^' I45� 48; �4JI v_ �.}cJ� 4�j I�Oi f 16Ri_0Q� Isa' 55� -440.-�Q� --- �s�j 'se, 9 !60� 61 (��i �9�L''. J1 63� G4� _ �..��.��.� 6 � ��. J1 66 67 6B G9 �o »' ',s6,r-r35 �s 73 74 75 7 �~ 31 M�y 1�91 Clairns List � Fri 10:59 AM City af Mendc�ta Heights ; Ternp Check Nurn6er 54 ,;T Ternp,--------_._.._._. _ _ __. _. '1 Check �= Number--Vendcm Narne - Accc�unt Cc�de - - •4 �`1 54 Spectrum Carnp & F�rinter Rpr 01-4330-460-3Q+ G' ------54 �Spectrum Camp -& Rrinter Rpr - @1-43�0-4�0-50 - - `7 � J4 Spectrum Camp iG Printer Rpr Q�1-433@-4�Q�-7@ `� �4 Spectrum Cc�rop & Frinter Rpr 15-4330-49Q�-60 �' - - - :,4-•Spectr�vn Carnp & Rrinter Rpr - 05-433�1-490-15 ,. `... � 324 -- - Tat�ls �'emp Check Number �4 -� - t r.' •�;I Ternp Check Nurnber 55 �6' H �55 Streichers . . -- -- - . 01-4305-�i2@-2@ � -- �ci � �...F_...—_�5---------__.__.__ ._..• -- . _ _. ._. ..-- -•---- --- -------. ..__ _ ._ �?�I Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber JJ y,i i ;-Temp-Check--Num6er-...—.----_-_ - .;,(, - -� --- --. ___��__..___---- - t23� ;_.� 56 Thc�rnpson Const 01-3140 �`—' -- �,� --- �_^��_— ---- - - - - ----..__�_.� � T.-------- JS ,;�i Tatals Ternp Check Number 56 128i. -.� _..«�__. .__""_.__�._�..'_.' i S! Ternp Check N�unber �� W57 130I �3�—�7--U�-LJest-•Gc�mmunicatiar�s --�-- •---Qii-4�10-03@-34•------ �� 57 U S West Cornrnunicat ians 01-4210-Q�50-5@ �`31 57 U S West Communicatioris Q�1-4�1@-070-70 �---S�-U--S-West -Cc�mmunicatiar�s -- ---15-4�10-@60-6@--- �--- .aa� � I --- 135� ��8 "G� --�c�t�ls-Ternp.-Check-Nurnber- -------57,___,_____ 37i "�_.__ ._ '`Et Ternp Check Nurnber 58 ��9. Comrnents install cpu board install cpu board inst�il cpu bc�ard install cpu 6oard install cp�� boamd splys rfd lic fee May svc May svc Mcly SVC May svc - 58 Uniforms Unlirnited � �� `Q�1-441@-03@-3N M� � ` splys � � 58 Unifc�rrns Unlirnited Q11-441Q1-020-20 splys Vaillancc��trt 58-Una#orrns-•Uril-irni-ted------------.-01=44.1�-4�2Q�=2N-----_� ____splys�Arndt--•-•_-- 174 . —�-�c�t�ls-�ernp-Check- IVitrnber------ Ternp Check Nurnber 59 m .�,9 United Way St F�aul Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 60 Western Life Ins, Q1-�@7@ 59 01-4132-@31-3Q� 4 -_.��.. .�_" _' ' �. _ Jun cantr � � Jun prem Page 9 - �1•• � i' , I -- --- - - ----- a pmc�unt - '�- .i' 1J5.J5 !�'I r __ S3i�7. JJ - ' .--__,..'.__ __'.'._ � � 136. 35 ,u ; � 136. 3� ��l --- 136.25 _ _. _ �. ------ �. ir,.''. 818. @0 ... � �. i �75i , C� -- '� 45.5@ -.__ - ---- ---- -- ,;�� - -- --_.. _ 45. 5@ --- - --- --- --�-- �G� " � {= :f.� 1 �`7` - - --- - - - - � - -_. ..._ _.. ^._. ..__--- - : £ ..'` , �J. Q�Q� 3: � ____ .___.__ ..-- 25.00 '._- - ------- - �3; ,3q 13'� _.'___.. "___.�.�_... ._.__�._" �"'_"._J._"" �.'__ _` �R' �37 �38I: 39 ^ ___.__. .__. ___l.-1Q�.b@•----'..--__._..—____.__.--._ t�,l JJ. J% �41� a:, SJ. 37 'n3! �.�<! -• - ----- ---- -- - 35. 36-------- ------- -- ___.._r.._,4., ------ iaci 216. 7Q� ia; i 444.00 6Q�. �;� ---.97.-55 601. 80 19b. Q0 146. 20 (l 31'.May 1991 •--- -- �- � Fri 10:59 AM Ternp Check Nurnber 6@ �-_- - ----•----- --- y � - -- -- Ternp. ' Check `- Nurnber Vendcm-�IVarne-- --- -• - �4 G� ; 60 ��y---Tatals-Ternp-Check Nurnber- 5� Ternp Check Nurnber 61 ' � 61 Wi»thrc�p & Weinstine 61 Winthrc�p & Weinstirie Clairns List City of Mendata Heights - - Accc��nt - Code - -- - - - --- - - Carnrner�t s - 60 --- ------ --- - - - -- 01-4�21-12@-10 01-4�2�-1�Q�-�0 o� Apr ret�iner Apr prosecutic�ns - ----61 Wir�throp 1�-Weinstine @i-4��@-120-80-• - Apr Re F�entel ��;� 61 Winthrop & Weinstine @i-4e�Q�-12@-8� � Rpr Re Hansen �� bi Winthrap & Weinstir�e 16-42�0-120-00 Apr Re prap purch i.�__�_�._�___._�_.,------- - • -- -- ---- • ------ ----�� ------- - --- - _ _-- - ------ - - - - _._._ _ �__ ;�i ��, 305 ;�E, Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 61 ,ts+..,"_ ___��__ _'_'_„"'-. '_'..._.__ ' �_-_".�_._��_�'_ '�" "__."._'_"""' _" '_ .._.�_^-._. _�__, aoi ---- .. +zs :-�--4275v ..�___.,_..__...---------_.�__- _------------------•------�---- '�3; Grand Tat a l ^! ---- - - - - - —'� �--' ---------- --------- _ . � .. ,.. cs --- �MAIVUAL CSECICS:'�-•-- --------- - .. .- -� --- -- -- - - - _ _ _ __ --- �6' �=�i 13136-139 60.00 softball umpires 5/16 �=a! ^� � ��' 13140 25D-.-00-�Beoke'r �Comnty- -�'-'P. "D: �warrant --- �<` 13145 30.00 Govt Training regr ��' ___ �_� _ v _ 13246 800.00 Conanissioner of Trspt supplies ��• 13147 -'� 3;514:'S2--SCCU--V`---'-'-"—"-`�5/17 payroll-deduction 3�` 13148 50.00 Minn Dare Officers regr �3=` 13149 300.00 Dakota County Bank 5/17 payroll deduction '34 -------- ---------- -- -- - -_.--- 13150 14,093.32— --„ --,--------•- - 5/17 w/h-- ----- -- ��'! 13151 3,264.79 Co�nissioner of Revenue 5/17 sit �V'� 13152 8,076.09 PERA 5/3 payroll � 7' ---^'� — Z3153 � �2;259.-22 "Payroll -a%c---'"--'S/17 net payroli--- ��ef 13155-158 120.00 softball umpires 5/23 • -- - -- --F�9e -1�----- -----•----- �- -- --i I , ;� - -� --- Arnount ---- - - -- � -- •- -= = 146.�0 ;?:~ - ---_----.___ -• - - --- ----- ----- ___.----�1 ;� i --- �: , JiQ�. 6Q� �1� p-. 1, 3�6. 44 ,%`�' � ._.. �_____.�76. 8�h - - �----� - --. .�-- - --- �-`-. 76. 2Q� :s�;-, 1 � 478. 80 �� . s <o �.___-.��_ _..__�_.,�-----•- ----,:i, 4, 438. 64 ,'��,_ � '24� I �_'_ _ __� - _� __ 5 �`� � i --------- z; . i _"_"�_'_"'6�� JQ�J. gJ�_.�_._._____..�___'_" _2E� '�o , ;j .�z: _'__' ..�� _�_ -- --� _'--.._-^-r,_3� i�4� �=�� 13260 • 500.00 Midland Nursery balance of a/c Sibleg Complex �—�_ _--------------- --- ---�.�----------- - - - 73,317.94 G.T. 140,823.79 • .: Y�� c� � �� r 9„� � , ��t,�,� METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION ��PP+IS Sq�ryTq Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport Fr t 9� 6040 - 28th Avenue Souih • Minneapolis, MN 55450 m o Phone (612) 7'L6-8100 • Fax (612) 726-5296 at � t h O H v �: �, F a~ o�aaoat5 Go May 28, 1991 Mayor Mertensotto City of Mendota Heights 1101 �ctoria Curve Mendota Hei�ts, MN 55118 Dear Mayor Mertensotto : � This letter rovides members of the Corridor Task Force with an »n�a±e of ±1;e ��z �� ef .+?:e •'�:��_^'-:M-- "-.-�- p . �,........ �.��,c�`.:: Commission (MAC) corridor proposal to the Federal Aviation�Adn,;ni�tion (FAA). ' • � The �ocal FAA Air Traffic Conbrol Tower at �e Minneapolis-St Paul International Airport (MSP) favorably completed its internal environmental review of the comdor proposaL The proposal has been sent to FAA Regional Headquarters in Chicago, and must be reviewed by both Regional Headquarters and FAA Nadonal Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Discussions with FAA personnel indicate that the review phase could take up to 60 days or longer. Once the review process is completed, the local tower can begin testing the proposed comdor procedures as outlined helow: rOR SIMULTANEOUS DEPARTURE CONDITIONS: Aircraft departing runway 11R wi11 fly to the runway 29L middle marker compass locator beacon (approximately 0.47 nm off the departure end of runway 11R) and execute a turn to a heading assigned by ATC such that the aircraft ground track w71 closely approximate a 115' (1Vp track h�om the middle marker. Aircraft departing ninway 11L w�l Ily to the runway 29R middle mazker compass locator beacon (approximately 0.4 nm off the departure end of runway 11L) and execute a turn to a heading assigned by ATC such that the aircraft ground track w71 closely approximate a 100' (11� track from the middle marker. . FOR NON-SIMULTANEOUS DEPARTURE CONDITIONS: Aircraft departing runway 11R w�l be assigned a heading to maintain a ground track of 105' (N1) from the departure end of runway 11R � Aircrafrt departing runway 11L w11 be assigned a heading to maintain a ground track of the extended runway centerline (appro�mately 118' (I1�). . We appreciate your support and patience with this process. . Sincerely, ��2�� . _,qel D. Finney .puty Executive Director-Planning & Environment . Y The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer. Reliever Airporls: AIRLAKE � ANOKA COUNTY/BLAINE � CRYSTAL � FLYING CLOUD � LAKE ELMO � SAINT PAUL DOWNTOWN CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. Dani s Public Works ir SUBJECT: Virgil McQua� Response INTRODUCTION• Last meeting Mr. Virgil McQuay, 976 Kay Avenue appeared before Council during the Public Comments section of the meeting and made several claims concerning problems with his property arising as a result of the trail construction along Victoria � Road. Council directed Mr. McQuay to submit his claim to the City in writing. DISCUSSION• Mr. McQuay has submitted a five (5) page claim, and several subsequent addenda which have all been provided to Council earli- er. If any Councilmember needs another copy of Mr. McQuay's claim please contact City Hall. Copies of Mr. McQuay's claim have also been submitted to the City's insurance carrier, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Mr. McQuay has also made several phone call complaints since the last meeting. Tom Knuth and I met with him at his home on Friday, May 31st during a rain storm to view his drainage claims first hand. Listed below are what 2 believe to be Mr. McQuay's major complaints with the City and my suggestions on what to do to improve the situation. 1. Backyard Drainaae Mr. McQuay had a very large yard that had a portion of it acquired by Mn/DOT for I-35E construction. Mr. McQuay maintains that his yard used to drain adequately before Mn/DOT acquired the property and rerouted Victo- ria Road blocking and diverting the previously^souther- ly drainage in a ditch to the east. When the City installed the trail last summer we were required by the County, who has jurisdiction along Victoria Road, to construct a trail separated from Victoria Road not just a widened shoulder as the City originally proposed. This separated trail construction required us to push Victoria Road drainage farther north towards Mr. McQuay's property (he believes it was pushed onto his property). Mr. McQuay has now gotten Mn/DOT to agree to survey his south property line. Once that survey is completed the question of whether the trail, slope and drainage is on his �roperty or in County right-of-way will be answered. 2. 3. 4. 5. The problem with the sluggish drainage and minor pond- ing along Victoria Road near the trail was not caused by the City's trail construction, it was a preexisting problem perhaps caused by Mn/DOT. In my opinion the City did not do anything to any extent to further aggravate this existing drainage problem. There is very little that can be done to correct the problem without installing a storm sewer and incurring a major expense. I do not feel the problem is severe enough to warrant the expenditure for storm sewer. Drainage, from the West Located two lots west of Mr. McQuay's home there is an area that was seeded (after Mr. McQuay insisted that it be sodded). It is obvious that we made an error, the area is now eroding with these recent heavy rains. We are currently taking bids to have the area sodded. The drainage from this same area continues through the back yard of Mr. McQuay�s immediate neighbor to the `'"��ast and then flows back into the ditch along Victoria at the southwest corner of Mr� McQuay's lot. MX. McQuay demands that the City direct all this drainage to the ditch along Victoria for it's entire length. We would need agreement and an easement from Mr. McQuay's neighbor in order to accomplish this request. Even then it would be costly and disruptive to the current backyards to accomplish this demand. I do not believe there is enough of a problem with the current drainage pattern to warrant this cost and disruption. Brush Removal Mr. McQuay demands that the City remove brush from Mn/DOT right-of-way and a tax forfeit parcel located north and south of Victoria near Lexington Avenue. There is also brush in the ditch in the right-of-way adjacent to Mr. McQuay�s neighbor to the west. None.of this brush was�placed there by the City forces or its contractor, however I have agreed to have City forces remove the brush to address one of his demands (if the City does not remove the brush, no one will). . Dead Trees Mr. McQuay has several dead trees on his yard that he claims died as a result of the trail construction. This claim has been submitted to the City's insurance carrier for resolution. Shed Damaae Mr. McQuay claims the floor of a storage shed has rotted out as a result of drainage problems caused by the City. This claim has been submitted to the City's insurance carrier. � 6. Garden Mr. McQuay claims that there was damage to his garden as a result of drainage problems caused by the City's construction. This claim has been submitted to the City's insurance carrier. Staff will do what is reasonable and possible, given our limited resources, to placate Mr. McQuay. We do hope that he realizes that many of his concerns were, although in somewhat of a different form and location in some cases, preexisting and it is unfair to ask the City to correct them at this time. Mr. McQuay has informed staff that he intends to attend the City Council meeting and discuss these items with Council. JED:dfw � J �-Y CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 28, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Hearings on Mendakota Country Club and Somerset Country Club - Club Liquor License Renewals INTRODUCTION• We have received applications from both Mendakota Country Club and Somerset Country Club for renewal of their Club Liquor Licenses. The licenses for Somerset Count�y Club and Mendakota Country Club will expire on June 30th. Public hearings have been scheduled for 8:00 o'clock P.M. on June 4th. RECOMMENDATION• All of the license requirements have been met by both Clubs. There have been no liquor violations by either Club and both, as always, have been excellent to deal with on liquor licensing and operation. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the renewal licenses. ACTION REOUIRED: Council should conduct separate public hearings, and if Council concurs with the recommendation, it should pass motions approving the renewal of Club Liquor License for Mendakota Country Club and Somerset Country Club. � 0 '---'- . --� _._v.-__.�_____---•--•----�-'------'----------'-'---- ---- --'^�.--�--'�.- ._�..._-_'------T�-'�_-� --" KR CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE IS HEARING ON RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CLUB ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE May 13, 1991 NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City Council will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible on Tuesday, June 4, 1991 in the City Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve to consider a renewal application from Somerset Country Club for a Club On-Sale Liquor,License. Somerset Country Club is applying for a , Club Liquor License to dispense liquor on-sale at the ` private country club facility at 1416 Dodd Road Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above application will be hared at this meeting. � Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk t � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTTCE OF HEAR.TNG ON RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR CLUB ON-SALE LIQUOR LTCENSE May 13, 1991 TO WHOM IT MAY CONGERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendata Heights City Counci.l will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter � as possible on Tuesday June 4, 1991 in the City Gounoil ' Chambers, 1101 Victaria Curve to cansider a renewal application from Mendakota Country Club �or a Club On-Sale Liquor License. Mendakota Country Club is applyi.ng for a Club Liquor License ta dispense la.quar on-sale at the 4 private country club facility at 2075 Mendakota Drive. Such persons as d�sire to be heard with reference to the above application wi11. be heard a�. this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson Gity Clerk r. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 28, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Marriott Courtyard Liquor License Renewal � INTRODUCTION• The Marriott Courtyard Hotel has applied for renewal of its Limited Service Hotel and Motel On-Sale and Special Sunday On-Sale Liquor Licenses which expire on June 30�h. The applicable Ordinance No. 1403 requires a public hearing on all liquor license applications. The hearing has been scheduled for 8:00 o'clock P.M. on June 4th. DISCUSSION• The applicant has submitted all application materials, including insurance and bond forms, and a statement of liquor to food sales ratios for 1990. Police Chief Delmont and I have reviewed the application contents and find everything to be in order. The Marriott Corporation and local staff have been excellent to deal with. We have not received any complaints nor have there been any license violations. RECOMMENDATION• I recommend approval of the renewal of the Marriott liquor licenses, subject of course to any public comments Council may receive at the public hearing. ACTION REOUIRED: Council should conduct the public hearing, and if it concurs in staff recommendation, should pass a motion approving the renewal of On-Sale Limited Service Hotel and Motel and Special Sunday On-Sale Liquor Licenses for the Courtyard by Marriott Hotel. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING ON RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND SPECIAL SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE May 14, 1991 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Iieights city Council will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon there after as possible on Tuesday, June 4, 1991, in the City � Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, to consider a renewal ' application from the Courtyard Management Corporation for Limited Service Hotel On-Sale Liquor License and Special Sunday Liquor License. The Courtyard Management Corporation is applying for a renewal license to dispense liquor on�sale at the restaurant/lounge facility in the Courtyard by Marriott Hotel, located at 1352 Northland Drive. � Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above application will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk � � �1�_ Ef _:_ � _ _ � _ MEMO May 28, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk SUBJECT: MGM Off-Sale Liquor Liaense Renewal INTRODUCTSt�N' The L'AMP, Corporation has applied for renewal o�' its Of�-Sale Liquor Li.cense for the MGM Liquor Store Iocated in the Mendota Plaza. The current license expires an Jun� 30, 1993. Staff has �cheduled the required public hearing far 8:00 a'clack P.M. on June 4th. DISCUSSION• The applicant� has submitted aIl application materials, including i.nsurance and band forms. Police Chief Delmont and I have reviewed the applicatian cantents and find everything to be in arder. MGM has complied wit�h all Ordinance requirements an.d has been cooperative with staff dtzring its third year of operation. We have had na negative e�eriences relating to the o�f-Sale aperatian, nor have we received any complaints. RECOMMENDATIONfACTION REQUIRED: Staf� recommends approval of the renewal of the MGM Liquor License, subject of course ta any public comments Council may have received at the public hearing, Counail should conduct a public hearing, and if it concurs in the recommendat�ion, Council should pass a motion approvirtg the renewal of Off-Sale Liquar License for the MGM Liquor Store. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING ON RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE May 13, 1991 NOTICE is hereby given that the Mendota Heights City Council will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, on Tuesday, June 4, 1991, in the City Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, to consider a renewal application from MGM Liquor Warehouse for an Off-Sale Liquor License. MGM is applying for a renewal license to sell � liquor off-sale at the Mendota Mall, located at 750 Highway 110. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the above application will be heard at this meeting. � Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini ra FROM: James E. Daniels Public Works Di r SUBJECT: St. Peter's Church/Pilot Knob Road Utilities Feasibility Hearing Job No. 8420A Improvement No. 84, Project No. 2A INTRODUCTION• The Church of St. Peter recently became aware that there .� would be an advantage to installing public utilities to serve their site in conjunction with the first phase of the Mendota Interchange project and petitioned the City to complete the work. A feasibility report was prepared in April that showed th� project was feasible, however there are several other properties that will be affected and a public hearing was called to notify those people of the costs. . DISCUSSION• The St. Peter's Church project includes eight different affected landowners (see attached list for owners with proposed assessments). A large portion of this project area is located within the City's T.I.F. District and it proposed to utilize T.I.F. funds to pay for cemetery assessments. Three single lot watermain assessments have been shown for Acacia Cemetery's two sites to allow them three hookups (only watermain is proposed for in front of Acacia at this time). T.I.F. will also fund Mendota's watermain costs as compensation for allowing us to hookup to their sanitary sewer system. • At the meeting that Council discussed the feasibility re- port, Mr. Jim Losleben was present representing the Church. He requested that the City include as part of the City's project some of the Church's onsite utility services and assess those costs back to the Church over the normal assessment period. This utility project is a large financial undertaking for the Church and having a majority of the work assessed by the City would greatly assist with the Church's funding problems. In addition, the service leads would be located in an area with a high rock ledge and it would make sense to have the State's contractor, who will be performing rock excavation for the Trunk Highway 13 work, also do the rock excavation for the Church. There are two potential drawbacks to the City doing this work for the church: 1. We contacted the League of Minnesota Cities for their opinion on the Church's request and they discouraged us from doing the work stating that "a public improvement shall be upon the property of the municipality which serves to further the operation of the municipal gov- � ernment and the interests and welfare of the public." This work would be on private property benefiting only ' one landowner, however to get around not having the work being on public property the Church could grant the City a temporary easement. 2. Treasurer Shaughnessy informs me that in order to be able to sell bonds to complete this project the con- struction has to be classified as "for a public pur- pose" under IRS definitions. The construction work on the St. Peter property could be regarded as private purpose and result in the loss of tax exemption on the bond issue. Based on the above, it appears questionable if the extension of utilities on church property via City contract is in the best overall interest of the City. � RECOMMENDATION• This project is feasible from both the technical and finan- cial standpoint given the T.I.F. assistance and I recomme�d proceeding with the project. ACTION RE4UIRED: 1. Conduct the required public hearing (I will be prepared to give a short explanation of the project). 2. Make a decision whether to proceed with the project. 3. Make a decision on whether the City should assist the Church by installing a portion of their service lead and assessing them the costs. 4. If Council desires to proceed with this project they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 91- , RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER TO SERVE ST. PETER'S CHURCH AND ADJACENT AREAS (IM- PROVEMENT NO. 84, PROJECT NO. 4A) JED:dfw ,'��, � STAGE I CONSTRIICTION: , Propertv Assessable Sanitarv Church of $61,000 of St. Peter St. Peter 0 Cemetery (Sanitary) St. Peter 0 Cemetery (Water) Garron $12,000 Property City of 0 Mendota Acacia Cemetery 0 (Platted) Acacia Cemetery 0 �(Unplatted) Franson 0 Hartz 0 Northland 0 Resurrection 0 Oversize Water 0 TOTAL $73,000 . Assessable Water $37,000 0 0 $21,000 0 $ 4,000 $ 8,000 $ 6,000 $ 6,000 $13,000 0 0 $95,000 T.I.F. Total 0 $98,000 $31,000 $57,000 $26,000 0 $33,000 $28,000 $28,000 $47,000 $51,000 o �, $37,000 $45,000 �0 $ 6,000 0 $ 6,000 0 $13,000 $150,000 $150,000 $ 8,000 $ 8,000 $327,000 $495,000 , �� . �. ► City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RE50LUTION NO. 91- RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWERS AND WATER, TO SERVE ST. PETER'S CHURCH AND ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 84, PROJECT NO. 2A) WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the 4th day of June, 1991, at 8:00 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota pursuant to resolution duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights on the question of the proposed construc- tion of the following described improvements: The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and.the y acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particular- ly described. The construction of an extension to the City's water�distribution system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particular- ly described. WHEREAS, due publication of the notice of public hearing on said proposed construction has been attended to; and WHEREAS, mailed notice of said hearing has been mailed more than 10 days before the date of said hearing to the owners of each parcel situated within the area proposed to be assessed, all in accordance with the applicable Minnesota Statutes, and WHEREAS, the City Engineer reported that the proposed improvement and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements and construction thereof; and WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minneso- ta and is more particularly described as follows: Church of St. Peter and surrounding commercial properties to the south and west, Dakota County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City Council then proceeded to hear all persons interest- ed in said improvement and all persons were afforded an opportunity to present their views and objections to the making of said improvements. NOW THEREFORE, IT I5 HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows: 1. That it is advisable, feasible, expedient and necessary that the City of Mendota Heights construct the above described improvements, and it is hereby ordered that said improvement be made. :, . . • "1 , 2. That the City Engineer be and he is hereby authorized and '� directed to prepare plans and specifications for said im- provement. 3. That said improvement sYiall hereafter be known and designat- ed as Improvement No. 84, Project No. 2A. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 4th day of June, 1991. ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor a � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City May 29, 1991 Administ�� FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir c Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-09: HNTB (MAC) - CUP for Noise Monitors DISCOSSION The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their May meeting to consider a request from the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) to locate two remote noise monitoring towers in Mendota Heights. See attached staff inemos and Planner's Report. Mr. Bob Vorpahl, representing MAC, explained that these two monitors were part of 24 that are currently being located in all the neighborhoods surrounding the airport. The Planning Commission expressed concern that Mendota Heights is receiving 60 percent plus of the air traffic but only 2 of 24 monitors are being placed in Mendota Heights. Mr. Vorpahl explained that more monitors are planned in the future. The monitors are to be twenty feet (20') tall and installed sometime this fall. The MAC provided pictures of the proposed towers. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit to erect two noise monitor towers and that the MAC is to work with the City staff to determine the final location of the towers. The Commission also recommended that a third monitor be placed north of Highway 110. ACTION REOUIRED The City Council should conduct the required public hearing, and if so desired, they should implement the Planning Commission's recommendation by directing staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions granting approval once the specific sites have been determined and authorize the Mayor to sign and execute the resolutions on behalf of the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Planning Commission May 22, 1991 FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan� SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-09: HNTB - CUP for Essential Service �� Structure - Air Noise Monitor DISCII83ION � Mr. George Stuempfig, of HNTB Architects Engineers Planners, is representing the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) in locating a system of remote noise monitoring stations around the airport. This system is the Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) that MAC has been planning for the last couple of years. MAC has located two sites for placement of noise monitors in the City of Mendota Heights. These sites are in the Furlong neighborhood and the Friendly Hills neighborhood. Construction of these noise monitor towers requires a Conditional Use Permit for Essential Service Structures. (See attached maps for precise locations of the towers). The City Council, in consultation with the MAC in 1989 and 1990, approved the general location of noise monitor towers within these two neighborhoods. HNTB has chose 731 Mohican and 1307 Furlong as the specific sites for the two towers. Both towers are located in the City's public right of way, however, a public hearing is required and the neighbors have been notified. ACTION REOIIIRED Conduct the public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 28 May 1991 91-09 Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff 1.) 731 Mohican Court & 2.) 1307 Furlong Avenue Conditional Use Permit 1. The applicant proposes to install noise mo�iitoring equipment mounted on utility poles at two different locations within southern Mendota Heights. The poles are to be approximately 20 feet high and would be located within the public ROW. Basically the proposed RMS (Remote Monitoring Station) would include a microphone and other equipment necessary to record acoustic and meteorological data and communication equipment to allow the data collected at these remote locations to be transmitted by telephone to a central computer. We believe this use qualifies as substantially similar to an essential service. Section 4.9(1) of the City's Zoning Ordinance permits essential service uses in any district in the City. 2. Mr. Stuempfig states in his letter that this equipment is intended to be part of a permanent airport noise monitoring system and, therefore, should not be viewed as �a temporary fixture. Included with the application materials are photos of three examples of the type of equipment to be installed. The applicant indicated to us that they have not selected which of these systems they intend to use. We would recommend that the least obtrusive system be used since these facilities will be located near single family homes. 3. The utility poles are to be located within City-owned public ROW at each of the two locations. The applicant has had discussions with the City staff regarding the use of public ROW for this purpose. The applicant has identified several criteria for locating these facilities, which include; being. near electric power source, easy access for maintenance, not too close to trees as they absorb sound. There may be other technical criteria which we have not been made aware of. Howard Needles et al, Case 91-09 Page 2 Since the proposed facility needs to be near an electric power source, we investigated the possibility of locating the equipment on an existing electric utility pole. We were informed by an engineer with NSP that while they do allow co-location of other equipment on their utility poles (telephone, cable television, etc.), they will not allow any installation nearer than 40 inches below a power line. Therefore, locating a microphone at the top of the pole would not be permitted. They also indicated that, for safety and liability reasons, they prefer to maintain 10 feet between their p.ower poles and poles installed for other purposes. 4. The pole in the Furlong area would be located between 1307 and 1305 Furlong Avenue. These are the two homes aat the end of the cul-de-sac on the north side of the street. The applicant's site plan for this location indicates that the pole would be locate approximately 4 feet, center to center, northwest of the existing utility pole in this area. This would place the pole approximately 2 or 3 feet from the edge of the ROW. This location would be very close to the property line between the two single family lots and would place the pole almost equidistant between the two homes on these lots. 5. One of the concerns we have with respect to this location would be that the proposed pole not interfere with snow plowing or other utility or roadway improvements. The City is in the process of making utility and roadway improvements in the Furlong area that will include installing utilities and repaving the surface of Furlong Avenue. The edge of the new pavement as measured off the City's engineering plans will be approximately l0 feet from the existing power pole. In the current situation, the existing pole is within 3 1/2 feet of the edge of the roadway. This measurement is very approximate since the actual roadway is difficult to define because it is in poor condition and is primarily loose gravel and broken asphalt paving at this point. However, it appears that the relationship between the new edge of roadway and the existing power pole will be better after the roadway is resurfaced. The location of the proposed pole should not interfere with the improvements planned along this street. 6. The aesthetic impact of the proposed noise monitoring equipment depends partially on which system is installed. However, we feel an effort should be made to minimize the visual intrusion on the adjacent homes. This could include landscaping to help screen the base of the pole and the equipment box from adjacent homes. Howard Needles et al, Case 91-09 Page 3 7. The installation on Mohican Court is proposed to be located near the last electric utility pole on that block, as indicated on the location detail provided by the applicant. This location is once again roughly equidistant from the homes on the two adjacent lots. There is some vegetation in front of the home at 731 Mohican Court, which would help screen the proposed installation from the interior of this home. The proposed location is on the north side of the cul-de-sac at the end of Mohican Court. We believe there may be a better location for the installation on the south side of this cul-de-sac. The ROW for Mohican Court does not have developable lots along its south side. Rather, the ROW abuts City-owned property (abandoned well)�on the east side and other private undeveloped property on the west. The ROW in this area is lightly wooded and has a utility line running through it. An installation here would be within 150 feet of the proposed location, would have virtually the same access and would be almost unnoticeable. We would strongly recommend that the applicant consider locating the proposed monitor equipment in this area. 8. This equipment will provide the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the City with valuable information regarding noise conditions in this portion of the community which suffers from the effects of air traffic. If the equipment is carefully located and screened the aesthetic impacts can be minimized. We would recommend that the applicants request be approved subject to the following: 1. That the least obtrusive equipment available be installed. 2. That the equipment be installed to minimize visual impacts on surrounding residents, i.e. in line with any trees or other utility poles from principal view from homes. 3. That the installations be screened at the base with landscaped vegetation. 4. That placement of proposed poles be approved by NSP. ; � + -_.. _ _ �' i � - - Y � ' ',: �� 1° � � I �! ` t*f . � v • - •,� \ � J_.,.�.� =� = ^r� 1/) � �__ ��j ' ::c � �� - _' . �`' `- jt �I,' i�AE nwta� t•� .t j 1 3 '+� \ \ � �` � _ _ _ _ ,� �' Y^.._� , 1 � � . JUL - =1 - - ` . N � . (/ 4 � j � - � — - - - • s � ' + 'Y • � �� t M -� ; • t . Y+ . j . . �� \ ' � � ^ �� ` 1 '� i�i ,,,..1 ' r _.... _ _-..( � ' � . . f r — _L _ '_ � • �o f� . ,,,.'� • ��"'7�� . / •t p� � \\ � � \ � ,p. � • ( i � i :� . � l' i . r i�• ' � - \ , ( -- ,1-_� _ •., � 1 p:.a^ / t \ it3' . � ? '",j T� _ _ _ _ �i` �� -j j i � XY�J (+ � , � r : � -=-_y�' . !:=.r�5""fl..t« Q j�.. . f' y� i` g' o � - - — - � SUa.S..,,7.. � _ , ,� -i � * 4 eWAixtan TaT ppq�a C4 _� fxSE�EMl _ _ -� " ' t II P. ' ' ,.. �—.-.—�..�.� _ 2• � . �, 'bz; .� i • • I � � : ! � �- ._ -. " • • .£gl�N�Y MARSH ' •� •�. �;� � � A I a 'w i � - . � ._ C�, i t• �"�. _S'{�`• PARK � c�^ � � ,. • - • %�,=�+t`-• ' �� _� ( •k�• •,�.� I �\' + E E� y � = Y. . � � � I • � L,,.--� � � . '�' - ,�F _ _ * • � `',,\ • ��4 --• J� "' L—_.� r� • ' _ - r • ia ' • �f • •?�'� ./,_ � 1 - . . • �--- . . : .. , �. . i.�= . , . . . . .,. . .1. � .:_� ., . � . �'�-:. ' ' _ _ - � • ` - - --� �- � .._ • r, r� � * . "';c :��, --�'. _ . r - \' � t. -' / ._ __. _--�_..Y 1 � I l \• _ . , • + . 4 � _ Q _,_ 4�-F-�...T�Z �. �� .` _ --" � I � ' L_____ . --.---�4..1r�. ' -�- � .,,! J(� . "'� • -,- -� • ��:OR. �_ • a � fX I . � � � �� - ",,,�",- ' � t�' � r(' _ • ._',__., .� t � r r ' �r 1 ;' - - ; �, h;�' ` '., .�� ;,�� P , -" ' ._ =`�' __�` • `��-:-'�• '.K . �..��'�� a � �. ; . U i l• • OR v ' "i,:��f� i { • KE � +, .,y ' l � (' \ vJ i � � • � ♦ 6 �) �.',a .,,,�' � �:._ - ' f. T..�1' 1�'� _ ' ' .� ` .. • �I i.. __' �„„�•� ' . Q � � \ .. Q... /f b I .. _ � uar- . _r''` � � •- ,� ; •�--� . ! �'�-: , 'r�' � � � � / . -�..----� .,� . . `-��- " . , " . " �• - � r �t.. __. , ti �., .��.;�:,'--� o �_f . _� �: _ �o _{ , . : � , ._.� . -�. . r -.� t � � � 1 � t � W . . _ � - /� _..� . _ ��I•- �� {qo� .. � �� mv ,.` '�. �+ �� .� � �t �, _ - -- ----� - �p � . �.,,_...� x :`/ - -i ,' j ' . �� r _,.�.. � IY • � � .. ( ' < �••�Ts;: • APA • , �• • f�� . -" ~ �l � ' - _ _ , ! ' '" 1 � —_.. e ..� � � w . . . . ' � .�� _ -a.� '. —L—�I=_,_--- - ----�-- �- —. '';,=T ' . . ~� r'� `u • � � SUBJECT PROPERTY `�'' neat+oonEo � , ^ — �f� -Tt' ; '- � ,rEtt ' 4 q i � /� ° � � • '•. i`_� ,./ 1 ,K � � 'j ti ' . 'r ~� '� � ' NORTH =�' � �' � `�re /+ •� ♦ (! �� [14ECOMMEM(taC�PEYT_�1 �"" . ~ .�, � T�E�,S,r.=� , __.._ SCAL.E "- � .:� { � . : ,. . �o. �a�s x� � ; . : �. � � y —$oo . �. .� _ . . ,'� I$ i ��,� i ' ! . ��,.y- ` r�� i�� ' � � '. ,� � . � Q r � � i.(� 1 � . : { ._ i ' - . � "' . x�s '"� ./ '�--°.=o p i � _ a � ^r F '\ �1D /•�`.,,� U � � � � ' = __..:U �..\..�. ti . , � • . ��; •q: C� � \ � �' , i � �I � . p`_'��" t `C, jj�' £� . -�1 ,r'� �/ '.,.' , a � ¢ .�,id� � .'.� �` 4 ....� 4 � w w+J,,..�.`` `�' -- �.� h� 1_ . i° .�--=K�.°u� to. � HEIGN7S ROAD l�� ,`,,, �� '.' t��E�J� . ��C}.L'�1 .3�.., �r � ' �t~ � ro� � Z. I I )C ; I � 1� \//1 �� O� 4 , � � • :�i.i � � j : � . \ wii Y < + i ,\ �`� \ A.� ' . ! r. _._„ ♦ , i`W,'Q l�v0 � . 'n1 . � -g • J4�`t` .. _...._.._� � '��0�4f 1"' I y,r—�� ' (__.� ' �°� wr.+ .�• �� t C�� 1� t� . .. �� .: i ' —..,�"�\.. �. � � �: � �" �Ag--r.i�-• . ,._�, . , , : �� j .� � � �. . � . � �; - �.. , 1 � o' �- ..... � -.-. _. _ ..' " `"'"_ - � _ .�_ �7AI ln+1C .-.._._—.-1 i �. _� » .--%ifraF{WlS`i _ . � • " .. .. % i . �,,.-` � . _._._.��''�f-'� . -1 „!' :' � '/ r � ,^i I , �� .., - . . - / . . . . - '. _ : . - . . � .. • ��_ • � . ��r � I � 3 .,��t � •, � "_� . . �� L /4 t' R �.�. y 4 y `�, / D � 5 ,t{! i ! �o � i P : ti'1Enrvo r,q YYATE,E' �'L3 j /�. 2G/37-8 �L �tsTR1C7 �'19% 26137'A 3.9 » ,Q c. 010-51 a� 9o4d 3d AZ=O•t0 30� 24 60.0T --�" _ . � A7 9�51., . .'�6< rg S�� s88�45 t9�� y4,,� 535-32 � R+616.62 MENDOTA . ��i;�H 'ANSPORTAT_1¢,jj�,�.O.W, PtAT_,� O`tt eie.o� ��.,269°� � 79°2i �fi' � � � f� �V � •� ' SUBJECT AREA NORTH T � sca�E i N=2oo� \ '`s N. u•,... � > c�a9e.xa c o � na� �c34 0'� �' j 6 �. � �� 3 3 �} � OIO-52 y our�c �� , \�" — . � � � � � " / y �`' ` ?� =.---_�- `` , � �. / , i s S �� t ' _ _ ; � ( ! .d� � i � �' � _ — - . _ _:. - � �� ` ' =� �� '� ��_� �� ..� i � \ ��-- � _ � 4 �_' '- �. -- '- � p• �.0 - V - L� 0 ��r� \ _ � - \ � _1 •` . -.u�� _ �� —_ _ - .._, . ..- � _ _ - � �cn ��,� ��►�K I ---�- - =_ i ��^ - � � -- �." r 1� ' 'o i � '�'.� er - _ - - 1�" �/ cE � e R • •.'� , _ — - __- /- � ( .t � . `��_�� !�—.,,� `. f � i� ,; _ ��i� _ _ c � � . J � i (�� . � � .�,I � . �i � '. � _ ___`- �,// , rCwEiC • � A .r. � " - -_s - _ v�c�ORY - _ � � SUBJECT PROPERTY �' - -�- } ,� - _ _ _ � � � ; :.>:::: -- i � - . _ i NORTH � �`�`�':;�' _ - . � .. =�� ; t.. ..,.. SCAi..E 1"=8�tJ` ` ,, • . � , � _ � t � .. . . '�--��- �. ' --� --�.. , , 1 � �� i �J •, . i '�' �_� - .` �- •.•. :� �x .� ` • _- .�j��i �� . � taY/r ` .y�.. .:r o+7s�� - . l. -----�•� - r �,�_ _a.% d ' �� , -:a»• \ l; � • J _�- - ' _.._ __ _ _ �__ ,�.ti� _ = a � _ _ _ = � _ _�.� 0 .. . ,��:,�V..N, ' �t- � . ,y = " _ k �� .n��' � . _ -_ _ p� � .,� ��:' / - _'" - -_ Z � �` _ - ��'�, �h�� i '��'' i' _ _- _ _ �I �`D� —�' — —_c � �i� i =— —= _ " lt tl � = �t � • — — p in.� � � - - ( �� - % _ .. �� V' ' _ / — ._ ' ,��Y � - _ � , � � �'y � / 1» � � ,. —1- '.. _ . _ ._ .. � i � . / � \ . ' � i. ,� � iOh' \\ -- � - �� N t" r _ � '\\ �. � J 'r � ( . `�I` - • �✓ �� l b' � Ir i � i - - \ : f -y � i �. . i •. � \ • a _ e: , ` � � � '� � ._. 0 1 ��'' � Y • � � _. .._ �. '_ „ �� f � M DOTA HEtOHTS ROAp" " ' / �.T'ro � � ' w �- `n , � ¢ J `► °�`� • � a , , > , , N i ¢ � � �., r' � � % �. � a , Z � ; � �, . � �,, J I .� � � x . �""� � /� DRIVE � I MORTMLANO ORrvE w ~ � I �--�� :./� jj - / �� f � ' \ l� � � � J o�. . '+i' E � _ � _-...--'t � � --- - � ' � ' � f . s� ---� -- --�- ;� � � i � � ' ( j �u;� f � � ��e�. s�.res�+o«e� co � , - • '•. •; :T . - c '"r.'---•-�.' ' -' '.' / ' ��r..\ ' ' '�.....,_T ' ` c- _ � �_.%" ��r �:� . . . • . �,z---- � _____-- . ..__�_ „ - "';'� 'F • , . . . . . . . . �"'-- -.^� , �" •- �`T-•' . • ' -' r-'-- • . - ---. ..` ._ ... , , _ -. ...-.- _ �� ' �'.: . . . . . ' �--• . \�� ;�/ � ` 1� \ � � , � � � ` ' I /� c J� �.{! � f {---- _..+ . --'r : '� - _. t � � � � �2 � i`�� ., �"_ � ,� �/. r % �. � :�� .;, , �� . �., � � �"' � �� .., � � ��` �� + 1 � `` � � � l � \\ — - - � d ' '�-vR.-i`— - i-:'-� • - - t s - ' `�'r� 2 zs1.o -� -' - . 4.• . .o �8 -_ .�_ _ .} � \1 \` . � T� , � a � � ' c�, � `� � . � .'� . r , � � `� �`� 3 j i la � �� ` � \ , `� \, � S i �• � � � � � \��1 � 1 ,�\ ; � -t ;1 :,. S SL l C o a •.Yq: i : i j t �^ ��ie•:::•.; 3i�:��:::f;;':%�s`:i:%>::'`:'`' � � i�-�Y':: ::�::i: j �':':�: �:� �'2$:�'�i:::.::: i . �. � � ':':'k:;;�:;-;';: ia::':=:�;:: i<''�'�''r .�i � � :; �;';:;:<> . i' ' f r:.'��.''�-':i:::...�;:.:'::� ��•':;:i;<:;`•'�';:;�:;; �:;:;:�: � 7 � K 9 �.•��..�'i:;•.::::.�:: •:•:�:fi"-�:�:::'':�: _:.: �` �� , .. , � i:<! u°;`•;:��,'�:�:::':; �'�::;':i:: �� =:::: •`•�•�� .?i � �'�'�'': , ! ' � O' • � c!. , � � _ m : ��;':: �, � `. ` ..o ,,� ��`'i1S[�:��'.��' :''�''i :�..,`,.',..':�..?..:....? .��' ...♦.. ... `" - ---- ..Sn � to �..L. ..�.�'fJ..".'°:.;. .._.� '� 1 N � ::.r:'=t:::.....�:_:.;i.;y;S>:r � � i � 1 F- U E' l O N',('�z,';-'�;;?.<'r'#14'S:•`:;-.';•••��'�'''::: Q ` � _ �ry : :::.: ...:..::.:.:�..: , i 1 ,k1 � , � .N� �CO'• �4J fu(J�:f•:•.::.:: 1 ` � � ' N �UBJECT AREA �� i �., � Z � . � SI4 �+Z; . •�'� � i ( i ` :��, � ti- - -- �---►. .__.�.__.. . � ._.. . N4RTH � �j�, .��- - -� , i � �� ]�„ SCALE 1"=2U0' ` ='_'�.�j L' � � . 7 �" S � y �o i � � I� � Z.c s r2 -- -- , - �� \ \ `__'._._ .�o�o Lo .� ...o .� `. _._...__ QSJ � I � i �, �„ , �RYMc�NDV� AYE, ; C f! ` � "_ ..o .v " o �"o� ao lo cu �c,� �Ti4TE � , . �' '-y i � t ' j-'t \ ' t # � ^�+ � l / � �WY. Nt3. 55 � 9 $ � � s � �. � � L � ,�� : �a-._�s..,_.�_.- i ,.� \ \ ` ` �M _ � � �� +( � j �� . � � F ! j "'�./ �. � f0� !1 fL lj 14 IS ( 14 �� „� . � � .,� „ ..o o� ea co o co � o -/ ' L A K E V 1 E Y\( A Y E. ' '`�" � ----- t '� --( o.� T �o ,�,o �eo �a �a �o �\1 1 � 1 ` � S �� , � � � \��' a I 6 5 ¢ 3 zh i � , `� '— �U -- - �o ..o �co .n c�o 6a sz7 ' .! •G�o�7/ L... 1�- .�cr�u/rl /L'1. B�// '� A ZG f 4Q ~8 - --- - - — 2 /�ic :. _ . ._. �_� .\ �� A�. � a3a-2� �1 �,�� R r�o�4thy L. �\r.v� Gan/. M•L. � Valer�cour- `\� � I�o�-ath4J 3 "' A c . `'\.. -_ � , Ya/encou 4/�y/a ,y� / Ac. Ca��e Z W F!_ i_ O Z Iv� (� N � K 1T�- G O . - ._ ..---�� _ ...—.. e _ _ _ -- 04Q-27 V'' 2' f �'.` c' L o f ,3 � z6�4o--c � /�/7o�'�'t�."7o`"/_'�7'` /%1 %��'/"�c:� /7 5 � �9 � . ,._-� 0 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 25, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direct � Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-09: HNTB (MAC) - CUP for Noise Monitors DISCUSSION . «. HNTB Architects Engineers Planners are representing the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) on the placement of Remote Monitoring Stations to be used with MAC's Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS). They were scheduled to appear at the April 24, 1991, Planning Commission meeting and the May 7, 1991, City Council meeting, for which staff published notice. HNTB requested a continuance to the May 28, 1991, Planning Commission meeting in order to provide better site plans. (See attachments). We recommend that Council continue this hearing until the June 4, 1991 meeting. ACTION REOIIIRED If the Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should pass a motion continuing the public hearing until the Tuesday, June 4th, 1991, City Council meeting at 8:00 o'clock P.M. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO April 17, 1991 TO: Pl'anning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis n r SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-09: HNTB (MAC) CUP for Noise Monitors � ** REQUEST TO CONTINIIE HEARING ** DISCUSSION �. Mr. George Steumpfig, of HNTB Architects Engineers Planners, is representing the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) in locating a system of remote noise monitoring stations in Mendota Heights. This system is the Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) that MAC has been planning for the last couple of years. Mr. Steumpfig originally intended to be on the April Planning Commission agenda with his Conditional Use Permit request and staff published and mailed notice for the hearing. Upon reviewing the application, staff requested more detailed information on the location of the two noise monitor towers. Mr. Steumpfig informed staff he would not be able to prepare this material in time for the April meeting and requested a continuance until the May Planning Commission meeting. ACTION REOUIRED Continue the public hearing to the May 28, 1991 Planning Commission meeting at 8:00 o'clock P.M. NOTE: Staff will inform those residents notified by mail that this hearing will be continued. JED/KLB:kkb � HNTB April 30, 1991 HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN 6 BERGENDOFF 6700 France ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS Avenue South Suite 260 Mr. Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: MAC RMS Sites Dear Mr. Batchelder: Minnea[�o1'u, Minnesota 55435 (G12) 920-4GGG Recently you and I discussed locations of the two remote monitoring station (RMS) sites proposed by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) in Mendota Heights. We had applied for a Conditional Use Pernut on behalf of MAC for two sites, one on Mohican Court and one on Furlong Avenue. We were then informed by the consultant who wrote the technicai specifications that the Furlong Avenue site had been changed to a location on William Court. In our telephone conversation dated April 16, 1991, you said the City prefers the Furlong Avenue location. After discussing with representatives of MAC, we were instructed to proceed with the permit application process for whichever site, Furlong Avenue or William Court, that the City of Mendota Heights prefers. Based on our April 16, 1991 conversation, we are prepared to proceed with the application process with the understanding that the two RMS sites will be on Mohican Court and Furlong Avenue. If you have any questions, comments or disagreements with these two locations, please contact me or Greg Albjerg as soon as possible, as the technical specifications for construction must be modified by addendum. Sincerely, HOWARD NEEDLES TAIVIlVIEN & BERGENDOFF . � �� George M. Stuempfig GMS/vw cc: Steve Vecchi, MAC 1424(IBATCH.GMS P.rena�. Charlae T. Henn(Ben PE, Daniel J. Spipei PE, John L. Coccon PE. Frencia X. Hell PE. Ro6arc S. Come PE. Oonaltl A. Oupiee PE, Williem Love FAIA. Fbbarc O. Miller PE. Jaman L Tuccle. Jr PE, HuBh E. Schell PE. Cery G Goodmen AIA. Gortlon N. Staney. Jn PE. Hervey K. Hemrtwrxf, Jr PE, Stephen G. Goddnrd PE. Jahn W. Wiphc, Jr PE. R�haro D. Backman PE, Rieherd L Fernan AIA, Oauelea E. PreecocG PE � A��ooi�ee� KerWall T. Lfncoln CPA. Roberte W. Smithem PE. Harry D. Barcoeea PE, Relph E. Fobieon PE. Scanley 1. Mest PE, Welter SHerko PE, Rass L Jeneen AIA, Frank T. Lamm PE, H. Jerome Bucler PE. Bletee M. Cerriera PE. Michael P Ingardie PE, Bernerd L PNrce PE. Scephon B. �uinn PE, Seul A. Jacobe PE. Ewing H. Miller FAIA, DouO�ae C. Myhre PE. Carl J. Me�lea PE. Oeniel F Backar PE. Donald P. Keuch PE. Foneltl L Marcje PE. Thomee L Willieme AIA, Oennle E. Conklin PE, Jahn E. Kupke PE, Rodney P. Pello PE. 6Cavan M. Reies AIA, Robarc A, Leick PE, Glann D. Saduleky PE. Benjamfn A. Whieler PE, RaBer S. Auet(n PE. John D. Brachera PE, Cherles L.O'Reilly, Jn PE. Robart M. Sben PE. DouBlea A. Bayd AIA. Reymontl J. McCabe P� Thomee A Skinner PE Poul A. Yerceei PE. F. Christophar OimarW ASLA AICP, Roland W. Frerkinp AIA. Jemee T. Klanla AIA Tarry K. Miller AIA, Roper C. Ward PE, Maurfce D. Mdler PE. Roberc L. Wacaon AIA Offlea� Alaxandria, VA, Atlenee. GA. BeCon RouOe. LA, Boeton, MA, Chorlancon, WV, Chieaea. �L. Clevelen0. OH. Coneord, CA, Oallee. TX. Oenver. CO. Felrfieltl, NJ, Harcford. CT, Houecon, TX, Indienapolie. IN, Irvine, CA, Kaneae Cicy. MO. Louiaville. KY, LaxfnOcon, MA, Loe AnOelen, CA, Miaml, FL, Milwaukee, WI, Minneopalie. MN, HNTB April 2, 1991 HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN 6. BERGENDOFF ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS City of Mendota. Heights Planning Commission 1101 Victoria C�irve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 RE: MAC RMS Installations Dear Sirs: 6700 France Avenue Sottth St�ite 260 Minneu/�o!'u, Minnesota 55435 (G12) 920-4�i6G The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) has submitted a 21 Point Noise Abatement Program to the Governor and the FAA. Part of tlus program is an Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS), which includes a system of 24 Remote Monitori.ng Station (RMS) installations for acoustical collection at locations in communities surrounding Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Two of these loca.tions have been identified in the City of Mendota I3eights by MAC. The RMS installations will process and store acoustic and meteorological data for transfer in batches via "dial-up" telephone lines to a central computer. The installations will consist of a microphone, noise measurement and signal conditioning systems, communication systems, telephone and electrical interfaces, and protective equipment enclosures mounted on approximately 20 foot poles. The RMS installations, the concept of which has been approved by the FAA, are part of MAC's permanent airport noise monitori.ng system. Their purpose is for data gathering only, and not for enforcement of flight tracks. Generallocation areas for the installations were picked based on data collection needs; e.g., noise sensitive areas over which airplanes fly on a fairly regular basis. Withi.n the general location areas sites were sought that would minimize interference from non-aircraft sources. An attempt was made to locate all sites in public right-of-way at points where connection to existing power and telephone lines would be convenient. The two sites identified in the City of Mendota Heights are at 731 Molucan Court and 1307 Furlong Avenue. Each lot has a pole for an overhead utility line near the street. The poles for the RMS installations will be near these existing poles. MAC will own, operate and mai.ntain the RMS installations. P��tns�� Charloe T Hennipan PE. Oaniel J. 6p(Bel PE. John L. Cocton PE. Franci6 X. Nell PE. Robarc S. Come PE. Oonetd A. Oupias PE, Williom Love FAIA. Flobert D. Miller PE. Jemee L TusGa, Jr PE. HuOh E. Sehall PE. Cery C. Goodman AIA. Gordon H. Slanoy. Jn PE, Hervay K. Hammontl, Jr PE. Stephen G. Godderd PE. Jahn W. WiOhG Jr PE. Richertl D. Boekmen PE, PichoW L Farnen AIA, Oouglea E. Preecacc, PE A��oai�t�. Kendell T. Urxoin CPA, Roherte W. Smithem PE, Herry D. Bercoeea PE, Raiph E Robieon PE, Scanley I. Ment PE, Walcer 6herko PE. Roee L Jeneen AIA. Frank T. Lamm PE. H. Jerome Buelar PE, Blelae M. Cerriere PE, Miehael P. Ingerdia PE, Bernard L Prinee PE. Seephen B. �uinn PE, Snul A. Jaeobs PE. Ewie�p H. Miller FAIA, DouO�os C. Myhre PE. Carl J. Mellea PE, Oeniel F. Becker PE. Ooneld P. Keuth PE. Ronnld L Ha�cje PE. Thomee L Will7ame AIA, Oennie E. Conklin PE. John E. Kupke PE. Rodney P. Pelio PE, Scevan M. Reine AIA. Poberc A. Leiek PE. Glenn O. Saduleky PE. Ben�omin A. Wh(aler PE, Roper S. Austin PE. John O. Brochere PE. Charlee L.O'Roilly, Jn PE, Raberc M. 61oan PE. OouB�ee A Boytl AIA, Reymond J. MeCehe PE, Thomae A. Skinner PE, Peul A. Yeraeei PE. F. Chrletopher Dimontl ASLA AICP. Rolontl W. Frerking AIA. Jamae T. Kfanla A10. Terry K. Miller Alq RoOer C. Werd PE, Maurica D. Millar PE. Roberc L. Wacaon AIA Offlee� Alexondrio. VA. Atlenca. GA. BaCon RouBe. LA. Boacon. MA, Chnrleetan. WV. Chieepo. IL. Cloveland. ON, Coneard, CA. Dallas. TX. Oenvar, CO. Feirfield. NJ. Nercfortl, CT, Houecon. TX. Indianapolie. IN, Irvine. CA, Kenses CICy, MO, LOWaville. KY. LaxlnBton, MA, Loa AnBelee. CA. Miemi. FL. Milwaukee. WI, Minneepalie. MN, New York, NY. Oklahoma City. OK. Orlanda. FL. OvarlarW Perk, KS.:�hilatlelohfe. PA, Phoenin. AZ. Roleiph, NC. Seettle. WA. TBmDe. FL. TNae. OK, WilminoCnn. DE City of Mendota Heights Apri12, 1991 Page 2 This letter serves as a request for a Conditional Use Permit for Essential Service Structure in R-1 for the two sites listed above. Enclosed you will find 20 copies of site development plans and RMS equipment details, an Abstractor's Certificate for each site, an Application For Consideration of Pla.nning Request, and the applica.tion fee. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me or Ross Harris at 920-4666. Sincerely, HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF �� George M. Stuempfig GMS/mst Enclosures cc: Timothy Malloy Dahlgren Shardlow and Uban 300 First Avenue North Suite 210 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 r��-�,,.r,.^�+�� .� Bob Vorpahl Metropolitan Airports Commission P.O. Box 11700 Twin City Airport Station St. Paul, Minnesota 55111 �; City o� .�.11.� 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Case No. G �-� -! � Date of Application - 02- 1 Fee Paid ��'(� ( Q b• Applicant Name: HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN & BERGENDOFF pg: 920-4666 (I.ast) (F'ust) (N� Address: 6700 France Av So. , Edina, MN 55435 �iv�meer � Sireetj (Ciiy'� (Staiej (Zip'� OwnerName: Metropolitan Airports Commission (I.ast) (F'ust) (1vi� "` Address: P.O. Box 11700, �ain Citv Airport Station, St. Paul, MN 55111 - (Number & Street) (City) (State) . (Zip) S�ctLocataon of Property in Question: Within Utilitv easements near two nrouerties located at 1) 731 Mohican Court and 2) 1307 Furlong Av LegalllescriptionofProperty: 1) Lot 31, Block 22, Friendly HIlls Re-Arr; 2) Lot 2, Block 3, FurlonQ Addition Type of Request: Rezoning X Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Pemut for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City rUrdinance Number 401 Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Other (attach explanation) Section 4.9 (2) 7. 2 (3) � r. PresentZoningofProperiy R=1 PresentUse Single Family Residential (both locations) Proposed Zoning of Property ; R-1 Proposed Use Sin�le Family Residential (both locations) I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material aze true. .,, ; D H� (Signature f Applicant) ��aM� � E � 2�� . �- '-/ �" MAR 2 0 1991 cDace) . (Received by - Tifle) 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendote►� Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 . � SCALE: 1 "=10' � 0 N 735 MOHICAN CT. 40' OVERHEAD UTiLITY LINE 11.5' � �j EXISTIN6 UTILITY- POLE MOHICAN COURT RMS LOCATION DETAIL SiTE 13 14' 731 MOHICAN CT. .� �GUY WIRE TO ANCHOR ?� 14' N �— PRoPoSED RMS LOC�4T(ON FURLONG � AVENUE � . SCALE: 1 "=10' RMS LOCATtON DETAIL SITE 15 ..' HARRIS MILLER MILLER & HANSON INC. ,� MSP ANOMS - Specific RMS Instaliation Sites 30 October 1989 • Project 280470 pa9e 28 �. YYYYYY. Exampies of Tracor RMS Installations Exampfe of Brue! 8� Kjaer RMS Instaliation t " � �:; _-_. :;.�..�T-�_=.�-:-�:.•-x-_� .. �.:. _ •�.,-; «y �.�,.:.., �:a-:: 'ti xv.1 �.�.�_ .. :i• : �•: •�, �i �+'i i+i='�.;:.ra.. ...:• -.-i'--_ -.- •jO' ...:a�..�,•.r� ... �:`• � �:l.• : - •..' ��1t(I�M�.....i: rf.r�'-� �%--�.i� '. .i�•j~j:'S•1'tr�•v..... '�-:;::- � `� n:,u=g;-;:'"_r,T=�� r�• �":-_�: � `.'.:� �� i,�%h:..r:w��"ti.�": r-• _ �. � _,.. � � � _ y� 4;� �;;,�::; ;,'-^ ��, � :`� ; � � n. .• ' ,,.,,�M:; ;: _ �L•. :,:'.`�r: '>:: "S^:'�«�:� •Ss�' � aT:�i�'� i'afiw r� .i �� _ ::I.��'�r�ti'� s�L��i.�_ . _ • :,n�e�, Y ._,- . . . + . �ry."si: �7 , ., . -• r i��.r, . i . , _ ' : ..._.. .." . �_ . . +w d L0 M�CRpP►�C�.tE ASSy zpQE WST��ED � DY Z R1�GlJR t" u�� j . ; WAS[St VWE 1 1 TNQi1.o (iA%vEo) �� i . N tU �/1hS�� --� LUCK111Ca � FjtPICKEi l'PPEQIM►.ST S1.PP�0.T ��-1 O N T.`jPtiCA�,. R,�_A_S POt� �L�VAT1oN 6 i'G•n1ER tJ.1p '�EIS�P►LO�.IE �1t1E SERWC.E �iTRp.1�CE (TyPtiC►S. L�CA110�.1) P�vcrc ASSF►nra,y 1+�1[RL�4�� t1�.WE CG►JD�11'( . ... :=^s� 'Tp 6L�M�►,lAtE RAT'c1..ES, ARRA11� DRACKE� S SO SN Vv�t�Eai 1M5S W SE1.TEp �b�Al►t: UPPEIC �1tJ�k l� `�1G}rf ►nt�T �q17�l�tED�10 � co�n�t t.a�i pW►.CKET E1.fC��RpNrCS Es.lttlYSlJi�fc u4TE � CA►1TM�1'�D�C iD OQ� ti+VIST 1JA M E1xiA�.NRE ON Pc�E z0 CI�AR �SZACIiS WNfc11 OPE0.A'�qJG ►AAST NSb Tp PR47�l�OE MOJc1MuM Pfi�iECT10N Tn PEC�ES'�fl1�sS A►�U vEN\CLES US1?JG AU.7►.CE1.1'i S�OEWALY. AUfj ytplaQ Tracor Applied Sciences EX4-�1�1�C 1 RMs Qa�E SC1.l� : NO*�E 1 � S NOTE: ENCLOSURE AND MOUNTINC� BRACKETS SUf'F'L�L��' 8Y 7AACOR � -{ ��1C1la5�.iRE FAST£?i E��GpSlf� -- '{O tW,N+iEI..S W ('f N DG_TS ►.fi0� �Np� 1JEl. 1�1�T'1� A.S R�Yf\REro� 4 i'►�S m 1 f Z� GALVAt�i1Z,�U r ►nr�Ku� e�cx.�c w►r,� z fE.I�pEQ WAS►+E� o A�D �T 1'xAu c�rt� • . LAIE OF Pb-fi W,lO O� C}�p�.�NEL , 2 PuC.S �-' � I � o� � I Or F--� �• � M�CRpP►rCtk Cp8l1E GDtiQI]t'( 3 N � r..> � �tni �� , a� � e � }�Oti.ES r;Rll b�t R � WAIl..Of CA1�W1� lAaY ZD A�1.a,N N Fott W►.'��R '-' Q�RA1�1�� 0 0 I��i ALIGNNf�jT ENCI.�SUR�. M0�1t-1G o D�cTA�I.. �ETA11= ' �' � 0 . r.� ., • •! ��.,... l... ... � _.. l_ ._ _ ��.Ectaa►ucs ENc�osuaE � � � � Il � � il i�` utCRBPMOttE GABtE CONOUtT -""*" � . ,_ I1 NoicH cuT �N woop {�F NECEss�atr� �� • FOfi S►iUt, Fii OF SiEEi. BiiACxEt I I tEGS AGAtNSt iM0Q0 PO�E gt�i10N�Ar � li4' aur�Et eoo� - i4 Aw6 {txP1Ul} STAxN0E0 GROU! WIRE CONNEf.TED '10 2" OU�IET 6QOY 1" HIGIU CONOU� i I _.__ _ _ � 2 eoc# �2' BW.t� iF+RU woaa �oe.E .�....� �,,,_�.�� ,�. � � ,s.� ...�... � �r. � TOP v�Ew 51E1E VEEW +��jy�/Y' �IM4M 4w'M+��+�� EXH181T 2 MAST PIV�T OETAI�S SCALE � NONE Pivot mechani.sm including steel bracket and outlet bodies wiil be supplied preassembled by Tracor. --- 141CR0?HONE C�Q4f -+-- QOtaTIM6 2" QU�i.f T BOOY -.— 2�� Ri610 CONDUIT .ti �..--„ er�*-r*'i tP".!^M! �i!!� � � � � � � � � � � � .� � � E� P� I�I H (TOP VIEW) ti� I�.L fvo.blr'-2ibJ.-Mlob tvlc�r 'L1,y1 �1:U1 hJo.Ul�1� f',U�4 . � UPPER ��ST BRACKET DETATL �„ —.------- Waod Poi e �'"�� Lag 3ai ts ( Z ea ) „r.:�.— M�icrophone Mast � /''� Metai bracScets �djust in directians rl shawn, brackets are syr�metrical for i�ft ar right hand appi icatiar�. � 1� ti. .� {SI�E Q��:r�i'} 0 Z_1�4�� 3/4" iia. ha1 es u. � � � �d tttrougft b4 L�1 i�/d �'� S 4'f m�S'C, Z �� dC85 F�CH I� iT_�. , MIC20PHO�lE MA�1" BRACK�TS ,__... . NDTE — BRaGKE7S AND HARnWARE SUPPL1,m BY TRACQR. _ _ _ .. _ .. _ .. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ G�EB 11AST BRACKET DETAIL� .� �cket positioned ta appi y pu1 t i ng forca ari mas�C as shos�n ta hold mast firmiy against upptr brack�t � t�ZWili V�,�sl7} ."1� 5 t Lag Bol t (Z) ��G�i QQ�t. Padi oc k Traca� �ppiied SciencP � ih�fCV1H TEL No .61?-��1-818� . ` �cacar Ap�iiad Sr.ia�cas Mar 21,91 21:Q1 hJo.009 P.05 Sha�Iaw eiectrica3 outlet � (must not interfere with reraovai of back panel } . ExHIBIT � RMS ENCLOSURE C�NFIGL'RA?ION � � � � Back panel mounting � boits (4) RMS eiectronics ; assembly {mounLed ` an back panel ) 10.5"Hx9"W' X s �� a � .°` � � Back pa�el Space for te3 e- � phone interface equipment (must nat interiere � with removal of € baCk panel j � � . i � G 0 CITY OF MENDOTA HESGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING Ap�Ci3 1Q, 1991 � -. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Nt3TICE is hereby given that the City Council of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:30 o'clock P.M., or as soon as possib].e thereafter,. on Tuesday, May 7, 3992, in the City Fiall Councii �� Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to cansider an applicatzon fram Iioward Needles Tammen & Bergendoff (HNTB) Architects Engineers Planners for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Metropolitan Airports Commissian to constru�t two Remote Manitaring Sta�ions for the purpose af tracking airi'noise with their Airport Noise and 4perations Manitaring System (ANOMS). The Remote Monitoring systems are prc�posed to ha mounted on �went� foot (20') poles at the following described properties: Item A Lot 31, Block 22, Friendly Hills Re-Arrangement More par�i.cularly, thi.s property is lacated a� 731. Mohican Court. . , and Ite2n B Lo� 2, Block 3, Furlang Additian More particu].arly, this praperty is loaated at 1307 Furlang Avenue. - This notice is pursuant to City af Mendota Heights 4rdinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the propased Conditianal Use Permi.t will be heard at this meeting. Kathleen M. Swansan City Clerk JUS2 A REMINDER, '1'IIE CI�:Y COLTItICIL WILL BE i;ONDU�2iNG THIS CQN132�.`IONAL USE PERMI2 HEARING aN JUNE 4, 1991, A�: 8:00 o'olock P.M. SUGH PERSCNS AS DESZRE ZC3 BE HEARD WITH REFERENCE '1'(2 THE PRCPOSED C:CNDI2IONAL USE PERMI�' WILL BE HEARD AT `l`FiIB MEETING. � � . � CITY OF MENDOTA HETGHTS NOTICE C1F HEARING April 3, 1.992 TO WHQM I'�T MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of Mendata Heights will meet at 8:00 o�clock P.M., or as soan as passible thereafter, an Tuesday, April 23, 1992, in the City Iiall Council Chambers, 1101 Victaria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Haward Needles Tammen & Bergendoff (HNTB) Architects Engineers Planners for a Conditional Use Permit to allaw the Met�ropalitan Airparts Commission to canstruct two Remate Monitaring Stations for the purpose of tracking ai"'� noise with their Airpor� Noise and �peratians Monitoring System (ANOMS). The Remate Monitoring systeius are prapased ta be maunted on twenty faot (20�) poles at the following descri,bed properties: Item A Lot 31, Block 22, Friendly Hills Re-Arrangement More particularly, this praperty is�located at 731 Mahican court. and Item B Lat 2, Black 3, Fur2ong Additian More particularly, this property is located at 1307 �'urlang Avenue. This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference ta the proposed Canditianal Usa Permit wi31 be heard a� this meeting. Kathleen M. Swansan City Clerk *** AS A REMTNDER, 2•HTS HEARING, AS REOUES7'ED BY �:HE APPLICAN�l, WAS C:aN7'INt3ED 7.�C MAY 28, 1991, AT 8:00 0' clock P.M. BY THE PLANNING C(3MMx5SICN A7: '1•HESR APRIL 23, 1991, REGUI;A�. MEE`lING. StJCH PERSCNS A5 DESIRE TC2 BE HEARD WI2Fi REFERENG'E 2�0 '1'HE PROPGSED CONDTZ`ICNAL USE PERMIT WILL BE HEARD A'1' TEiIS MEE'1'ZN�. *** �. p • :w C lty -O� � .,..1.� 1Viendota %�eights , May 22, 1991 Mr. George M. Stuempfig HNTB Architects Engineers Planners 6700 France Avenue South, Suite 260 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Dear Mr. Stuempfig: � Your application for a Conditional Use Permit will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, May 28, 1991. .� The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, � �(�"" +-, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Vlendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 � ��ltl� May 30, 1991 C ity o� 1Viendota Heights Mr. George M. Stuempfig HNTB Architects Engineers Planners 6700 France Avenue South, Suite 260 Minneapolis, MN 55435 Dear Mr. Stuempfig: Your application for a Conditional Use Permit for Essential Service Structure will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional IIse Permit to erect two noise monitor towers and that the MAC is to work with the City staff to determine the final location of the towers. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �,(-J1n..� � � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb . YO u� Pu�3u c N�A 2� rv� �,� scJa� 0 uC.,�1� �02 �:[� f'�l 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 4�2 • 1850 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 Mayor, City Council and City Adminis� James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista � CASE NO. 91-15: Marv Anderson Construction - Mr. Fred Haas - Wetlands Permit i DISCIISSION Mr. Fred Haas, representing Marv Anderson Construction, appeared before the May Planning Commission meeting to request amendments to several of their previously approved Wetlands setback permits. See attached memos and Planner's Report. At the meeting, the Planning Commission expressed some concern regarding the house pad setback proximity to the Wetlands. In particular, the Planning Commission did not want to go below a fifty foot (50') Wetlands setback if the homes could be designed in such a manner to accommodate this. The Planning Commission negotiated the following adjustments to the requested setbacks: LOT 3 4 7 8 9 11 12 ORIGINAL APPROVAL 65' 60' 65' 85' 70' 97' 95' REQUESTED 40' 56' 45' 60' 65' 88' 83' PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 50' 60' 50' 70' 70' 88' 83' The Planning Commission voted unanimously to waive the public hearing and recommend that the City Council grant the Wetlands Permit as revised in the above chart. ACTION REOIIIRED If the City Council desires to implement the Planning , Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion waiving the public hearing and approving the Wetlands Permit as listed in the chart above. . JED/KLB:kkb TO: FROM: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 22, 1991 Planning Commission James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan� SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-15: Dzscvsszorr Marvin H. Anderson Construction - Wetlands Permit .� Marvin Anderson Construction, builders in the City's Bridgeview Shores neighborhood, recently applied for a building permit to construct a house with a deck. The proposed house showed plans for a deck that would encroach upon the previously approved Wetlands setback that had been granted at the time of subdivision. As the Planning Commission will recall, we have recently begun considering decks as an encroachment on the Wetlands System. (Please refer to Planning Report, Smith Wetlands, dated April 23, 1991, for discussion of decks and wetlands). Staff informed Marvin Anderson Construction that the deck would require a readjustment of the existing Wetlands Permit, at which time, Marvin Anderson Construction reviewed their other existing pre-approved Wetlands Permits. They discovered that they need to request adjustments to three houses to allow decks and four houses to allow adjusted building pads. (See attached letter from Mr. Fred Haas of Marvin Anderson Construction). ACTION REOUIRED Consider waiving the public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on the following Wetlands setback adjustments: All in Block 1, Bridqeview Shores 2nd Addition Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot Lot JED/KLB:kkb - 3 4 7 8 9 11 12 - Approved - Approved - Approved - Approved - Approved - Approved - Approved 65' 60' 65' 85' 70' 97' 95' Request Request Request Request Request Request Request 40' 56' 45' 60' 65' 88� 83' .; Pl'��NNING REP�RT DATE: . �; . APPLICANT: LUCATION: ACTI4N REQUESTED: PL2��NNIN� CONSIDERATI4NS: 23 Apri.l 1991 91-10 Thomas J. & M. Jill Smith. 625 Hampshire Drive Wetlands Permit 1. The subj ect property is one -of several in this area a+sal�i.ch will require wetland permits in order to construct the second story decks which were part of the original plans for fihese hames. When �the area around this pond was originally platted, approval was granted for the building p�d locatians, �nany of which were right up ne� to the 100 foot line which marks the area within which �he wetland pratection ordi.nance is enfarced. The approval of �hese building pad locations did not consider the fact that the plans for ihese homes included access- to second story decks which when built would eaztend into �the area protected by the wetland ardinanae. The reason. for this is related ta how the defini�ion of a structure was i�nterpreted. � At the time the approvals for the building pads were gran�ed, decks were not considered par� of the «struc�ure" and could, therefore, e�ctend into the wetland overlay area without requiring a wetland peruiit. This �interpretation is contrary to the +definition in the Ordinance, which defines a structure as��'anyt,hing constructed or erected, the use of which requires location on the ground". Clearly a deck qualifies as a structure under this d�finition. � �iowever, it was believed that tha primary purpose of the Wetlands Ordinanae, was �to pratec� wetlands fram soil erosion, loss of significant vegetation, and other �adverse impacts resulting from the excavation• associated with more significant structures, and to insure that structures., particularly . anes .;.. - intended :•, for � human _ occupancy, were rtot located ;�in areas where �. they .would � be suhject-�to flooding. .. S�i.noe .':tfie��.canstruction ar • altera�ion of decks , does ;not . trigger �significant concern -with;-,respect � � _ to these �,� . criteria, �: - the :� ;defiriition _ was .: ; : nat - =�: sstrictly enforced, in fihese instances. ,. , .' � � - : . � � . - _ . ., ;�� . . .. . _ � � • �. - ' t=�.. . .. -_ -� . .. .. � : . . -- _. . . . . _. � . , . _ _ - - ~��, .-. �.. ., .. .. ... ., _ � . ... ~ � , . • - � � Thomas J. And M. Jill Smith, Case No. 91-10 Page 2 In recent years, public awareness regarding the environmental significance of wetlands, and the delicate nature of the ecosystems which they support, has fostered more stringent interpretations of the intent of wetlands protection regulations. We now know that even minor disturbances in wetland environments can sometimes result in negative impacts on water quality and wildlife habitat. In addition, as the City becomes more developed the aesthetic value of the natural environment surrounding wetlands, within developed areas, takes on more significance for area residents. As a result we have begun to look more closely at what goes on within wetlands areas. While the construction of decks generally i'°rivolves extremely little excavation, it can result in significant loss of vegetation, which can have detrimental effects on the wildlife habitat and aesthetic value of a wetland. By interpreting the definition of a structure more strictly, thus requiring wetlands permits for the construction of decks and other minor structures, we can insure that potential impacts to wetland environments are minimized. With this said, it is important to understand how the wetland ordinance is intended to work. While .it is generally true that the aesthetic value of a wetland is more easily preserved if structures are kept as far from �� the shoreline as possible, the 100 foot line around wetlands and water related re�sources is not a setback line. Rather, this line defines the area within which the regulations of the Wetlands Systems Ordinance apply. Even within this area, the Wetlands Ordinance allows some land use activities. In addition, many development activities can be allowed, if they meet the criteria for a wetlands permit as outlined in Sections 6 and 7 in the Wetlands System Ordinance. In this case, the applicant proposes to construct a second story deck and a three season porch within the wetland overlay area. The three season porch, which is to be built at a later date, is within the building, pad area originally approved and, therefore, does not require a wetlands permit. The sketch provided by the applicant indicates that, at its closest point, the deck would be approximately 70 feet from the shoreline of the pond (55 feet from deck to scenic easement line and 15:3 feet from easement line to shoreline). However, when we measured�the distance from the deck to the scenic easement line we found it � to be approximately 50 feet and the overall distance from the deck to the shoreline measures roughly 65 feet. Assuming � PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 28 May 1991 91-15 Marvin Anderson Construction Co. Lots 3,4,7,8,9,11 and 12, Block 1 Bridgeview Shores 2nd Addition Wetlands Permit «� 1. The applicant is requesting revisions to the preapproved Wetlands Permits previously granted for the seven lots identified above in the Bridgeview Shores subdivision. Mr. Fred Haas, representing the Marvin Anderson Construction Co. Homes, states in his letter that when the preliminary plans were prepared for the subdivision, the topography was not registered with the boundary survey correctly. This problem was originally discovered during the siting of homes in the first addition. Apparently the amount of error has been as great as 30 feet in some areas. This problem was partially due to the fact that the developer used Markhurd topography. This topography is prepared from aerial photographs which may have been taken at a time when these ponds were low. This � information was provided by the City and is commonly used during the preliminary plat stage of the review process. However, it is normally advisable to obtain a topographic survey prior to preparing the with respect to the boundary survey information significant features like ponds with respect to the boundary survey information. The City has the right to expect that the information they are provided during the subdivision approval process is accurate. It is in everyone's best interest to make sure� that water bodies, wetlands and other significant features of the property are accurately located, particularly when there are regulatory issues involved. 2. Having said this, we are faced with the task of resolving this issue. Fortunately the lots in this development are large even by Mendota Heights' standards. This helps reduce the impact of development on adjacent wetlands. In addition, the Wetland Permit adjustments for th.ree of the -� seven lots� in question are for the installation of decks within the preapproved setback. These are lots�9, 11 and 12. The issue with respect to decks is the same here as Mavin Anderson Constr. Co., Case 91-15 Page 2 it is for the lots in the Hampshire Estates area where we are currently reviewing several similar requests and where the City has granted such adjustments in the past. 3. The amount of encroachment created by the deck on lot 11 could be reduced slightly by rotating the home on this lot in a clockwise direction and shifting it several feet to the west. The drawbacks to this placement are that it puts the house off center on the lot and results in it being skewed from the street. These irregularities, however, can create interest and variety in a neighborhood. 4. There are four lots where the additional encroachment includes a portion of the house. These are lots 3� 4, 7, and 8. In the case of lot 4 the additional encroachment is only 4 feet. This is another lot which may benefit by making adjustments to the orientation of the house. In fact rotating this house counterclockwise could eliminate the additional encroachment entirely. The lots with the most severe encroachments are 3, 7, and 8. Lot 3 was previously approved for a 65 foot setback and would now be located within 40 feet of the wetland, an adjustment of 25 feet. Lot 7 while proposed to be within 43 feet of the wetland will only encroach an additional 3 feet over the previously approved 46 foot setback. The house on lot 8 is proposed to be within 60 feet of the wetland, a 25 foot additional encroachment over the 85 foot approved setback. 5. The Wetland Ordinance establishes 23 criteria which must be met before a permit can be approved. Many of these criteria are not applicable in this case since they regulate dredging and other non-related activities. The primary factors to consider when reviewing developments with single family homes near wetlands are, related to vegetation removal, soil erosion, the infiltration of silt into the pond during construction, increases in storm water runoff into wetlands, and the potential for flood damage to the structures. The removal of vegetation is not an issue in this case since the property where the proposed homes are to be located contains no significant overstory vegetation. In addition the area within 20 feet of the pond, where there may be underbrush capable of supporting wetland habitat, is to remain undisturbed throughout the construction process. The lowest flaor elevations of the proposed homes must be at`least three feet•above the normal high water level of the ponds. The City should require that extra measureswbe taken during and after construction to prevent soil erosion entering,the ponds, including the use of siltation barriers. Mavin Anderson Constr. Co., Case 91-15 Page 3 6. The requested adjustments to the Wetlands Permits previously granted for these lots should not significantly diminish the overall character of the area or further endanger the quality of the wetland environments surrounding these ponds. However, we would recommend that the developer be required to take extra precautions during the construction of these homes to protect the ponds from any adverse impacts. In addition, we would suggest that consideration be given to adjusting the homes on lots 4 and 11 as discussed earlier in this report. Finally, we strongly advise that in the future developers be required to provide accurate survey information locating all wetlands prior to the approval of the final plat so this situation does not happen again. � � _! . � � �aL�l _"r l . � ; '-�. :: ........ . �� - - .` :?'.-' . j-1 r `, � .:a:"- .... ' _ �;. �,A�� r�- ��3. ?;,. °�. -- � -,�_ _ =a :. H a�� —� ._.-� _ f. � :4: � . '°�"' ' ,_._...� ^� 1 / J _ 3 1 - .-r'�, . �r___.-� �. •�',t+ + � ''� � � � �:_.:. -T -. • } Ppa,� � �.'� 1.: •� i...I � � � � �J � � j ~ . _ .. _, y- � � • ' f ! � • � � Y � ��} � j E �i +' � STaYESpWwE: 'Q �`• ~ ��.. , � SUB•STATiOM �• y � _ ' ` � � �� E NOAI�rtPh T�T ' pQ�P CO _�, E�SEYEMI --y _ ♦ __ _ _ _ 1� . p. _ _ � "�- 'j� ' = . �- i 1. j , �! • ' . I..�:'�€N�Y MARSH t . � I � �1`.��^ �S- - - - 1"_'_� � �"� :� i � a •i � ,. f�. � • . -• t ' � � • � ,'�'` \ x,,.�_�;=�t �� aaaK . . M F"' . . �- " <• z, � -�,, \ _ � �\� .�� '/. : r t `.' * ', .�r' "/ iF - �� { ' ( •�a �' ' 1 . --- � � � L._�— .� l`.;�. '. �._� ' . . • j� 1 r �' .-r., • f ..- _ • .e.q, , r �'� . , t� . �,, . f�' , r. � • • • �- ,_ ,. � ., , _ , , . . . , , . • _ � ,','. � � : �, . >` .. w�`t! , . _ . r� _ _ _ , � j / �� ,, � , �,. `� - = -' / �` '__= . „ . . _. . , _• � e°- ��. { . �-* � " '• "t . . . �. � . a > f �- a• F -"j ` -- _ ;cr..:_%-; ! " . _'_.__h• --7. � • 7�• co • . ¢ i ,o•_ -.. ✓ • � •� ,r '.j.' �` �!� : .e... ?' _ tX1.� %'� , a. i% ,^• • • . • •�• � I ' .M . . `� . �..� q.r �'� _� �=�. x ��. , 1,� \ z . ` ♦ • � + 1• � t ��'. .� ° �` \."�y� •j ��,' r/ aP '- • `r.! � � • • • r • ✓� � � � E' �\�`�,\� \. � '_ �`� � �• _ ��•, � U t R V j�"-� K �� • M \."� .. � . •J � '�• r-= . .-1` ^ : � . i ,�, � • J/"�%�7-- -•-.r� /•`- -"� . �.: . � . --r'��,+ . e jl�` (•� � � _- �«.-. 1 • `� _ ..�___-- ,� � • � Q f , ; ! ,—�, � � • • _ • r . "� �� i�, � r.. � ( .. .Oi• .. � A' • `' ,1,,_l7Q !,� ,�\ �• '/ !•�e . • M1 � �. � � t ('i �. � � ' . �Qa �t `� ;1� � \ t� � � ,Y •�• ♦ .�----./Y� � � • I ,n� • !I • � , _ W a . ' � Cf w • `"\ / �it J � � ' _ . • � � �a ('•1"`�r.,, �,,,_,,,j, -._ ' s • � E � � . . ^ 1 1 � ��, 4 �`'� s f • � . • • ♦ • + . / 1 a .�^�7 i � � . . APA n ` ' ! W„ � ! E LANE . ' • { . � � �• 1 � i i . ..• � � +� 7 � -I ' �_.� .�� . . � � /,a'-!-,� t � ~�t .O j �.� '• � - ' ` : i.'311Y / I a __�.. '4/ ) . • . t � „; :.;'� g �' ' �ZC�" StJBJECT PROPERTY `' . . . � • . � � � ~ � c-; . . �- \j, �,,�I t !r . V�.�.�' ' • * .�MacsrE2oM- �YEMi�,�CMfYT��1 \ f"+ � � • ,• 11 '. Zi � + ' ' 4..' • PARK I151i1T10i1 • � �, � :.,. y , �.�:.<:;:.;�. NORTH ,. ' _ ' � • � E t uew i : M� � :•, • �, , ( A _ „x.---� _ SC LE y 80 0 � _ �---.�..� s.: (''\ � J � \ 6 f 1= _ - k Rpdp \ i � � � ` � � / , r` • Fs 0 �- \ � o� � \ '� • / 4 j � �• � �o . �'t �O u - - c � - - 1 ♦ \ c+ 6 - 0 : � c 'c - _ ui�� . 4 . . 1 Z 1 . t t M � �� sf ♦ ¢V- u I u.� _ __�__�� C _ ti ✓ • ♦� v? � � - l+ m� Y O i� � ' > . �.,,� - ' '•.`�-.}��e., �. ��,,/�—J '�'^� , ,.... _ `yx'�':`r.:.''. ut„ . ��+`� o• �i -_2 . , ... ^ �� -_ ' "NiET1�t3T�.. i.� � �� , o;`_� f ( _ �- r w"? , �o � � i J a F � � i . � »�� 9 ' i �/ � � L ! • � / �a , +r 4O y � s � � �� , 8 • J =, � - �_"-. � �`�O��tn` .. f. �� 4 � /' 1 t ! j�� _l G1�j) � e �� ` � e�� ' \ p�Ca�RQ�s�AY ' ��f�� '`�J : !� � t.: �°� �,-f ..�_ =� 'r- + �, � w .t�.-- ` � ,,. � �il �� - . :�'i � �� o; 1�'1 � '`' �.^l -� _� ' ��~- - - -� - - - - - - - � - - -_ - ~��'`�y-.- . . s'�c. ` . . . --' 'r--: - j ' �LZI� i`a�i`��t� I�i� � a :� . � ��, , i• j�^� • • + ., • :' ' - � • - �. � �,� it •�, � . � '� . ' . . . . . '. , ' ' -'� " .. � ", . =, . : . . .. _ � . ';;� �.- - _�%!� - .�- =�" . . . . - - � - • • - . . - . . ... . . ��. . � ��' . . . .;.- "!� . . ' _....� .,. - �•. • c�- - � , �� , t� -: ' , � �. _. . �+ �' • r,� =� _, _ :� .'� w =- \\ l ,�'' , _ = i � \\ � ' • . jtJ � ; _ ,,,,�, ` _ i ._ . : � / � i _ � `�1 �~i — _ 1 � j =--- �, _ = � - �; �r � �; May 9, 1991 City Staff Planning Commission Council Members City of Mendota Heights Dear Members: � I am submitting for your consideration this revised wetlands setback plan for Bridgeview Shores 2nd Addition. As shown on this plan, we are requesting a variance in setback on seven lots. When we first submitted our preliminary plan for the overall development, I was unaware that the topography was not adjusted to the boundary survey correctly. When the final plat was completed, the shore lines were measured to the lot corners and it was shown now in a different location. I now wish to revise the setbacks so that construction of new homes can be accomplished without having to re-submit to the city for variance. The last building permit, which I had approved, was on lot 9, block 1, Bridgeview Shores 2nd Addition. Paul Berg notified me that decks without foundations or with- out roofs were no longer permitted within the lakeshore setback. Prior to this permit, the setback was only to a foundation wall. This revised plan showing new set- backs with decks in place. The following is a list of the variance request. ; ALL IN BLOCK-1, BRIDGEVIEW SHORES 2ND ADDITION Lot 3- Approved 65' Request 40' Lot 4- Approved 60' Request 56' • Lot 7- Approved 65' Request 45' Lot 8- Approved 85' Request 60' i (Cont'd Page 2) ; i901 Lyndale Avenue South • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55420 • Tel (612) 881-2661 • Fax (612) 881-1391 � . , ' Page 2 May 9, 1991 City Staff City of Mendota Heights Lot 9- Approved 70` Request 65' Lot 11 - Approved 97' Request 88 Lot 12 - Approved 95' Request 83' I want to thank you for your consideration in this matter. I am attempting to reduce the need for taking up your time in regards to wetland setbacks requests by doing this at one time for this 2nd Addition. �These seven lots under consideration average 23,350 square feet above high water level - well above the minimum lot size required. Sincerely, MARV AN RSON HOMES � c Fred E. Haas Vice Pres. - Land Development FEH/cjp �� , w C lty O� , .�..�,� 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name: f (Last) Address: � (Number & Street) ^ Owner Name: �f'L_%t Case No. _G �- � '�J Date of Application q- Fee Paid J �I .C'�("��1. ��8CjC1 � Z� � (State) (I-ast) (F'ust) (11� ' Address: . �%��%� (Number & Street) (City) (State) . (Zip) Street Location of Property in Legal Description of Property: Type of Request: _ Rezoning Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval . � Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable Ciry Ordinance Number Present Zoning of Property Present Use Proposed Zoning of Property : Proposed Use I hereby declare that all statements made in this requ� material are true. � Variance Subdivision Approval � Wetlands Permit Other (attach explanation) Section , . (D te) � . 1� . . ` ' � . - , ' ' , - . �+;.. . J - . � � ; - _ • (Received by - Title) .. . _ . . . : . _ , . - _ �- . � . ; - - , ' ` - " '� - ' � � ,_ ,,�t�,.��:_ � . ,� �. �, 1101=Victoria'-Curve. �1Viendota�Heiglits; 1ViNt� 55118 . ;�452�•1850 ,�:��`' ��t: . � ., � --- �_..' _--".. -._-:�.,� .., ...�:- ��- � :. `..':�'.- �� ' .� . � . � ��.� .l May 22, 1991 Mr. Fred H. Haas Marv Anderson Construction 8901 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55420 Dear Mr. Haas: C lty O� 1Viendota Heights Your application for a Wetlands Permit will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, May 28, 1991. .� The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �l�-v�w L� Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant � KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850 � � .r ��1�1� May 30, 1991 Mr. Fred H. Haas Marv Anderson Construction 8901 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55420 Dear Mr. Haas: City o� 1Viendota Heights Your application for Bridgeview Shores Aetlands Permit will be considered by the City Council at their next regula�ly scheduled . meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended approval of seven Wetlands Permits: Lot 3- 50', Lot 4- 60', Lot 7- 50', Lot 8- 70', Lot 9- 65'� Lot 11 -88�� Lot 12 - 83�. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, � � v Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN - 55118 452 • 1850 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis��-`�'� FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direc o Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis a SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-12: Bruber - Wetlands Permit � DISCUSSION Mr. Jay Bruber, of 1852 South Lane, and Mr. Ross Erickson, Eagan Pool and Spa, both attended the May Planning Commission meeting to discuss Mr. Bruber's request for a Wetlands Permit to construct a pool within sixty-seven feet (67') of the Wetlands. The Bruber's had recently received a Wetlands Permit to excavate for a walkout basement. Commissioner Krebsbach felt that the Bruber's should have addressed their pool location at that time. She was concerned that the grading of the walkout did not allow the rest of the lot to be used for the pool thus necessitating the need for another Wetlands Permit. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted 4-1 (Krebsbach) to waive the public hearing and recommend that the City Council grant a Wetlands Permit to allow a pool to be constructed within sixty-seven feet (67') of the Wetlands. ACTION REOUIRED If Council desires to implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion waiving the public hearing and granting a Wetlands Permit allowing a pool to be constructed within sixty-seven feet (67') of a Wetlands. JED/KLB:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 22, 1991 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan�r �) � SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-12: Bruber - Wetlands Permit for Pool Construction DISCIISSION � Jay and Laurie Bruber, of 1852 South Lane, have made application for a Wetlands Permit to construct a swimming pool within their back yard. The Bruber's had previously received a Wetlands Permit in October of 1989 to construct .their home as a walkout. The home itself is in excess of one hundred feet (100') from the Wetlands, however, the grading required to make the home a walkout infringed upon the one hundred foot (100') setback. Council granted the first Wetlands Permit subject to the following four conditions: 1. That the grading will not go below elevation 932. 2. A maximum of 3 to 1 slopes be maintained realizing that adjacent to the retaining walls there is a very limited area that is steep. 3. Erosion control measures be taken and enforced through the building permit process. 4. Erosion control measures be maintained until ground cover is well established. The Bruber's are now proposing to construct a 24' by 42' swimming pool within seventy-one feet (71') of the Wetlands. Also included in the construction is a perimeter sidewalk and fence, which is four feet (4') nearer the Wetlands thus the permit requested is for sixty-seven feet (67' )'. The applicants state that no grading or landscaping will occur between the pool construction and the Wetland. The applicants have supplied the requested signatures of consent. ACTION REQUIRED Consider waiving the public hearing. Review the requested Wetlands Permit and make a recommendation to the City Council. JED/KLB:kkb PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 28 May 1991 99-12 Herbert Jay Bruber III 1852 South Lane Wetlands Permit for Swimming Pool l. The appropriate request here is not technically a variance, as indicated on the application, but a Wetlands Permit. We would be hard pressed to justify the hardship test required for a variance for the installation of a swimming pool. However, under the Wetlands Ordinance, a permit can be issued to allow construction activity within the 100 foot wetlands protection area if certain standards are met. 2. The applicant proposes to construct a swimming pool, concrete deck and fence partially within the 100 foot wetland protection area. Both the installation of the fence and the excavation for the pool, which would exceed 100 cubic yards, require a wetlands permit under Section 6(B) of the Wetlands Ordinance. The edge of the pool excavation, as measured off the site plan provided by the applicant, is 73 feet from the normal high water level (NHWL) of Warrior Pond. The distance to the fence, which is four feet nearer the pond, measures 69 feet. 3. When the Bruber's home was originally built they were granted a Wetlands Permit to allow the grading necessary to create a walkout at the rear of the house. This permit was granted with several conditions (see staff inemo). The first of these conditions, and the only one which raises any concern with respect to the current application, restricted grading , on the property to no lower than elevation 932. This is 6 feet above the normal high water elevation. Based on'the applicants drawings, it appears that the elevation of the bottom of the pool will be approximately 927. This does not include the additional 2 to 2 1/2 feet of excavation that will be done to install the sump line. '�he sump system is being installed to insure that no back pressure builds up under the pool in tTie event the g`round water level were to rise. � Herbert Jay Bruber III, Case 99-12 Page 2 Section 7(A) item 11 of the Wetlands Ordinance requires that the lowest floor of a building within the "W" district must be at least 3 feet above the highest known water level. Generally this standard is intended to protect homes and other structures for human occupation from damage due to flooding. Flooding represents little danger of damage for a swimming pool particularly when the sump system is installed. 4. The installation of the pool and'fence will not result in the removal of any additional vegetation from the Bruber's lot. Any spoil from the pool excavation that is not immediately removed from the site should be carefully stockpiled away from the pond until it is removed or otherwise utilized on site. Excess material �o be removed should be disposed of off site as promptly as possible. 5. The proposed fence surrounding the pool is required by the Ordinance. The materials for the fence are not specified in the application. Fence material should be of a variety which blends in with the surrounding landscape to the greatest degree possible. 6. Generally the proposed pool and fence are tucked within the area excavated previously for the walkout and should not have a significant impact on the aesthetic character of the area. If appropriate precautions are taken during construction, the applicants request would not violate any of the standards required for the issuance of a wetlands permit. ,�' � # a' i' ,� `� � • � w �•.I_ COUNTRY Ci.t18 t r '�. � � , � � • . ` _ � ' ` �• • `r "' � --- ' �---� .' � � ~� � •;, •: r. � • � � /� • `. �..'48GN �a((� �� ' + .I . . �..�f P�<C�p. � l; W£il'� -:'+�--' GO�F COURSE � t'. ¢ � � � '� H Q ~.- • : '�:.�.. . .. . � . � '1 ($y +J^v- � ' ' - / _. "1 I � :i. � 1 �""'.',\ .». �PI'WO1C) � � � 1 / ( , _ � _ ,t Y• s 4YENTWORT#i � •. . • s . . � a � PARK �� . g :: , . Q �� ,� i . - - � : : _. ;.: � • �-r '•.. ' • ' , d� u �. . ',) . i i • i � • ---_• - _-{ • '� .� - � _ j • : � ' _ ' �` � : - - - . . • 1 ' � � �,� ) -r'�� 11`_ j: , ,� � ._ . , ..i . � � �. �» �' '' .,.,� ` 'd ~� � -� � � {/�. � • .\ � _ _� � - , ,_S- � c� • �^"' � • ; - • 4 � t +T iF • � � • � �: � . � . / RN � • � • � •/ �� • � • • � •I aJ , / , ~ ' ' .�a,� � .�`' =3�1 Y� � �� ,+ � .�._ 1_. :� . _ � . _ ... _ { � , �^i. t I MENOC��'A �iE1GHTS � �/ j� � � ' ,a ,,,. � � PAR S GOLF fAURSE • ��i �' I i '" �� ' u � � � t PUB�cC} �' S � � 1 i y I� � � �t �� f � .� f ` � , ' � � � �� — y h � � ({' � • - �_- � � '. � � • . `�_ . ,J-. . � . � : • � • • ' �' � • •~ ..1. - � � _ z_:: . ; � �' � . • . . _ . � ' • • � �� ..'�` w l �" '�„ ' ' " � --- —%+' � �� •. , . � � f ': .1 syf $ �l _ , _ _. � � ' � � _. ..__. _... _ ` 1 -- � � • . �' / / : �� •� . �' • rQ � L�... � iO4w, .' N+ ' � �•, ��...�•_ '-- � r T— ' � , � s • ' a �. ,,,+� • • � ! � • r, • . . , . . . . ' . . • � , !'. r_ _ i N - ` --� ' + • •. • . . •�• I . � . t ";/ . 1 + � ' . /'r-"."�\ � + � :1 �� p�L -�' ' _ • i (. ` . .. +_ � . ►�. � - • {� �� ' ---- � -- ,,,t . ' ' _ _ _ , . , . . - - - ._ - . _ : , . � �.� � . . _ , �-. � _ � _ .:; _.�_. - ~ ' ' f - SUBJECT PRC}PER�Y ' . - :'::;-� . :, : �_•, � � ' ' , . :::,�:�-::----. �, �..... t , ..�.;:..::- , � , .:::- _ --.—. ,, � • ' ""• - a . - _: a � ' -� ; NORTH ' ' ' {K.'��-=-- _ , , . •• . � • �CAL.E 1 "=800' _ . - _ _ + . . a � . . .� - ,,. . � �„� �., � . �� . � . � � • . . + � / i . . • . • _ ,�. / : .� • •�- :� � � �' �_. � -. s . . - . � • .' j • '' . • «Fr«. sw�E. 1 • �C � SErqM HK.M SCNOIiL ( + � —J �l1/�1K1 t � : �a�; � ' . �� " ±� .� • �A f � . •."�. : �s�• ' , . .. ...�. � .. � • + . . i �l +� ssa: � �s' ' + . j�• t � ` 51 -,.- , ;�s.� -.,- � �so �-- �. , ., . , _ _ �_�� o '� . .. . •,- - . . . . . � —' _� _ •• -• � ..� ��-- � � _ � � ,�-.._._ _ L.—. � � W A Y . , '_" — `---`' � �� .`. � � + * ;:'�� ' -� �` { • i O• c .�}� iti t �i� ��ig �� .t t:� 1�+Y:4 C �' , y� �� r �` � � � � � � 7 1 ! • � O [' � , $ � !( �� /, 1- 1 � �.i _" ' ---r i � r. ' . ,;::��,� - -. _ 1, ' i ��'y-� _y� :m= >��: � �,� � ` . —._._ :4�� oou�E _ � anruaf i {EaT£ � ,�--; I � = r ;�.�„�>. � �* - - "� � ' 1 .. .,. ..,<i:� � - - . y - _: �t . . � �.�.: :� o . -- � � - _ _ ' . � % iME MA � � • } �,' 1 I \ � . Ja�'y' tr wGN� � -t "r'�w � � � t----! � •��' `r •�' � # J� -_� ` y t . .� �----1 � ^ �u . ' , ' �. � � _�. _.�..._ :.^�' `,' ' � • • \=.,,��-"� r� � ) ^� _ 1� � _ .... __ _. � _ M A �2 1 E A V�. �---�.— �oZ ZpZ Ya Z Z.O Z ZSO Z ra q.,� I J �� h; � � � 'ti ! v !4 `4 Lo �i t 9 yi � g �• / 7 m� � � � �' N N� Fi I J �n i 1 H � � n J 0 ' % h 33 ^ i5 v �1 b� `� 1 � . n 4 3Z Q i,� �-� L'� 3� y 3 t +�' t1 c � ' � x �-- « N � '�� Zg7 S � o � , I ZQZ zos, zoZ �97 pC N P L A C F CA�L.AHAN pL �°� � � s � 1 1 �s, �g � ,ga a� 3 V n � i"fts- G,*£r � ^4 -- � �° � Fl�yllss M , � � ^- SE,tBJECT PROPERTY M o5a-o7 � oao-o7 � oso-o� � �� -as �� .,r - ^ "' � I�St 150 165.�3 _ .. �O 3zo.,g >.�.oz .:�.�:::: 9993 ,K NGIRTN �� r : �.:��::�:::.:��:��.:.: �.'• SCALE y"=200' �::�.::;::<:.;==::V.. < �s <r:;::::::::`::::s::�;'=�::;=><:::• � � /�,r . . - ' "'tl� � j": s � ' .3�d �,F:/��':.';':'.Y.':_''::':'v°�:f�'..ii:'t�'i��';"':'::vP. <9959 "a _ 67 f:::; " �� ':''i•'.�{.};%'i .,?:'..:...'::. : u, w �..., az .....,i+�?': ��::;.._..:::•; ::::::::..::::::: j.._1�,,,J .,_. . . �: -�--- —�- —.. _ .._...._ ._ .. ,� ``' . 4:`: � �' ;�:n. � � ;:':� .::;':�: .:'-:-:::::• i%::ti�: �'.•�v�'r � �'+� , � � :,'.`}:::?k:ti�5:-i::i:�:� t", :-:•;��i+:":}�y��::;:;:{::::;: �?��.�' ��2 m :�7s.:•.:`.�:v:t?':`':•yi;;l�7;:?:T�''�.'�''i}::`y`-:;.:5:''' ::;:Gf � \ < <, ... 4 ..^},/� .. .:............ ` ' 't°3 � \ ;:j , ... .: `:�;3{:1k'•'J..!":;::`.••%`:.''.::i?>`•.='.%'•`•::i.:?:yr.'.;:�r::=:� �.{,�i _ \ s q3g ry ,i•. s� .�•:..;'��'?�{%ry:�:�:y:::T;:.tt j a94 3� .,r 2J� d . ,�° ry� 0'� � I '4r"!'I�Ji � � .._ _ I o a � r/� � � � `� _ � r � r h _ m �/2' c " a O n, m� ¢ M1� „ 7T ' ' �- ! 7 ^ s� Q a�t, �,, / j OqQ ' '� a J.`'i�.3p N 1 f:{r a95 55 ?. 83 ia 57 a �� \ � � 52 �to e / � 1� �. ,!.{ + '� .� l � C? i71� 99577 "�l1w7? e 'C ?c ti_ J �� ` � _ ,�, �MJJiS � ! 1,ANE �• , ; ' "� 66 67 y � 556 D7 82 9i 'S.SS �tr� M _ `.'S� � � 79g3 � � � ._..... , . . 't� _ 3:.'j 73 - / ' --- / ' � � m � / aF7 �2 .- � a . .f / ~ �; . /"� �. r c i�+ � � _ b � � } ' 2` m! t<3 a2 O _ : � - 5�2 �3 � ~ � c�ai �S ."f - ^ �x - � - N � ,F V� 4 � •a ' - \ , Y� ^ � - V� - \ L - 'y ^ t �00 •<4 12 i 39' 32 670 . � xao ;�, # 34zBs W`-'' �99S.9S a� , �-.,,,,, ' mi *. n ._ O 0 °t ,� � � "+ � ? � a �r °n T. Z p v� ti _. 'M ,7 ri ' N N ry • a 1 ! Lo� � '30 ,3¢a,2. dS o Q 282, �S h �p �7 a V h h ` + 2a �.o .} � „�, a \ q p .Y + MI O � � el _'�`-(,�� s Y+ Q � 4 Q � 8 ! Z, /" 4 �, r � p 8 a3 �qC. � � • "' --� �, :, 2 ,� � � Q � �� H � � � ' H ;. iO ,b � � Z tl . �.� �, s �, , �,�.,�ro p O O � . . 0 3 0 49?_4 ��:: 1 � I � «� !3 � � ¢ � ., . c � EAC'=AN Pi00L 81. SPA May 7, 19 91 City of.Mendota Heights 1107. Victoria Curve ' M�ndota Heights, MN 55118 Re:�� 1854 South Lane Variance To whom it may.coricern: . Th'is•letter is addressing the installation of a swimming pool �� -� at 1854 South Lane. We are asking for a variance because we do�not meet the 100 foot setback from a�wetlands area.(noted ' �. a.s Warrior-Pond) We are 71 feet off of the pond, thus asking � .. �for. a � 29 foot variance. � - � •� . . . . . � �• For the following reasons, we feel that we are in a ha�rdship position: _" � 1) It�is of the experience�of the landscaper and.the pool , , .� company that the pool is placed in the most-appropriate • . � � � � �, setting both- .functionally and "esthetically., � , . .� �-� 2) The Bruber's establi�shed the Warrior Pond Homeowner's -" -� �' �� Association and obtained-a�permit.from the DNR to�have a � • , lake �inanagement company clean .up the pond� and �nsure , ' , . : its.continual upkeep for the future beauty:•of the"home- ,' '. • � � •_ "' � - • owner-s located on the pond . Thi s shows the Bruber' s . :• �� - commitment to the ecology of warrior pond. . � •- '- � � 3.) I-n_ building the pool and Tandscaping, we will not-alter ' � �'r� ' � . • � • �the slope of tYie land from its present state. . � • � , . . , • , ,• . . - . - ,��, '. .. 4) The Bruber's are -a career orientated family with 3 chilclren. ' .. �•�. -", �,They are conscious.and concerned about�developing their ��•.�� .�: home into�something the whole.family can grow into�the . ..�� ', , future'with. By investing into their home like this,they .• � • �- are''making a. commitment to stay and raise �•their family '-. .�'� �- .._in Mendota�Heights; •thus benefiting your city in the�� - -. � � _ • lo.ng., run . " � . . . - - � - • . ; �. ; . . : � Sin erely,� , � , ' ; � � . � • � . � ' � � , ;. , .. , � _.. •. r.'� ��. ..;_ . - " ' �_i- �. .' • . � . � �Ross Ericksori �.� •_ � � , �� - • � - � . _ �. �� s.RBE%bjb' ` . • . __• -. . .. _ �, . ' • . , . . ', ' : ' ' •'. � � , � �. �- • �� - ' ' ' ..�.�_°: _. . .. ' � ' . " � �� • . , ' _ � , - , • .: . ' - ' . . � � '� 1' • , • o , J .. • ~ �,+ � r ` V • , - , ' ' .. - . ` . . ' ` ' -, " _ ' ' . , . . � < . �' � "�°202Q..S�B�:�.�Svi�;20•EAcai•r,n/Iu:iri�.so�,55122%.(�12J.�688=08�0„`��_; . �'�..� . � ..`..�_° .. , : ,; . , . . . . _� : . . . , . . . � .. . . � ; � . �- . Applicant Name: Address: 1 � Owner Name: � Cit o� Y 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST .t� � �u.ec �e. (I..ast) Case No. Q � " � �' Date of Application S— C.� — q 1 Fee Paid I 31- 00 R�<# 0?5 80S a�r�T� �a�� (First) (N� 8 5 a<`�-ou fi h l�o�h e,►'Y� �,clo-{-t✓ (Number & Street) (City) � 2L�.3 E(2.� � � 1��8- So �.O m nJ ssr � 8 (Zip) (Last) (First) (Mn � Address: I 8 s��;��i-�. i.�h e, m.�.d o-f� �-i-s ., r� � 5 s� i 8 (Number & Street) ' � (City) (State) (Zip) Street Location of Property in Question: __] R 5 oZ ��(�'t—C'� �--0.�►�� i'y��.�.�-E-�- �-{-5 •,, n�� SS� i 8 Legal Description of Prop�..rty: �.O-i l Z� `� � c� C(� , ► he., �Po�n�S o� m�d� o-f-�. i-�.z�: qhf s Type of Request: Rezoning � Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. Plan Approval Comprehensive Plan Amendment Applicable City Ordinance Number � Variance Subdivision Approval Wetlands Permit Other (attach explanation) Secrion Present Zoning of Property Present Use `�"o Vh�e�S i- �.c'i._�. Proposed Zoning of Property _, Proposed Use '�O t'V�-2-S-4'-2-a- I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. . ' � � (Signature of Appli ) • G ��,�q�r cDate� � . . ��'M � � ��l..Q,e��il ,� '��c , , (Received by - Title) - � . • - , ..r`� '.i.• , � .iM1't . ..h t �� R �;a�;�:;� ��_ : 1101 Victoria: Curve •,1Vlei�dota Heights; �1VIN • 55118 � 4 2 • � � � � � n .� ~..: , , , 5 1850�; � . . . . - . - - -, . . . . , ', 0 LETTEF7 flF CO23SEI3S ADJACEIdT L}FtfSP'EF�TY O4}NERS VARIANCE APPLIEI7 FOR BY: JAY AND LAURIE BRUBER 185�2 SOUTH LANE MENDOTA HEIGH'I'S, M23 553.18 ZIARIANCE NECCESSARY . i2d Oi�DEi7 TO I33STALL I23—GROUI3D POdL ialTHIN TFiE . 200' SET BACK OF THE NIGH WATER MARK OF WARF�IdR POIdF�. � THE U23DERSIGNEI� ACKIdOWLEDGES TO f3E TiiE 04JNEK OF THE Pftd1SERTY SPECIFIED BELOW, AND CONSENTS TO GitANTING �F THE DESCRiBED tilAR2ANCE TO THE REQUIREME2dTS OF THE 20I3II3G ORDINAIdCE OF TI�iE CiTY OF 24ENDOTA HE2GHTS. 1dAM£---'�-�� — � =��-�---��.�----- ADDFtESS_�,�'3P�_ Ss2__�.�nL�.----- SIGNATUi7E �c..- � LETTEFI OF CONSE23T AD3ACE23T pF70PERTY £7W2+}ERS VflRIANCE APPLIE}3 FOR BY : 3AY ANi) LAi3RIE $RL3BER 1g52 SOUTH LANE . MENDOTA HEI�HTS, MN 55218 VARIANCE NECCESSARY IN L�RDER TO I2dSTALL It3-GROUND POOL WITHIN THE 100' SET BACK aF THE HIGH WATEF� MAF7K OF WARRIOR POND. � THE UIdDERSIG1dED ACItNt�t�?LEDGES TC� $E THE OWNEi2 OF THE PI�dPERTY SPECIFIED BELOW, A23D CONSE1dTS T� GRAt3TING OF THE DESCRIBED ' WARIANCE TO THE RE�I1ISIftEt4ENTS OF THE ZONING ORDI23A23CE OF THE CI'I'Y OF t�iENDOTA HEIGHTS. , %��%��5-C %hf�i L Zd/JI I3AME�G�� _ � � _ — ---------- —/ �_ .r- . ,p ADDRESS_ S� �SJ-------------=�-- v�------- SZG23ATURE �GG��_ ��_ �_ ^ i� ��`'`�` -- LETTEft OF CONSE23T -� AD3ACEt3T pFtf�F�EF'tTY C►W23ERS LIARIA23CE APPLIED FOR BY: JAY A2dF7 LAUi2iE $RU$EF7 2852 SOUTH LANE ME13DU1'A HE�GHTS, t�fN 55118 VARiANCE IdECCESSARY IN ORDER TO INSTALL IN-GROUND POdL WITHIN THE ].Ofy' SET $AiCK OF THE HIGH WATER MAkK dF '" WARRIUR PQND. THE U23DERSIGI3ED ACKN�WLEDGES TO BE THE f3t�NER OF THE PR£}PERTY SPECIFIEb BELOG}, AND CONSENTS TO Gf�ANTING OF THE DESCRIBED �IARIANCE TO THE RELli3IREMENTS OF THE 20N�NG ORDSI3ANCE OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS. NAME_� _ �_�� - -- -- ------------------ J., ADDRESS' � �� --�5� --�°�-1-�-----------�.�� " - , . � SIG23ATURE ' � C ity o� .�.. .� 1Viendota �-ieights May 22, 1991 Mr and Mrs. J. Bruber 1852 South Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Bruber: Your application for a Wetlands Permit will be considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, May 28, 1991. The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M:, here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, I� �3 Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb cc: Mr. Ross Erickson Eagan Pool and Spa 2020 Silver Bell Road, Suite 20 Eagan, MN 55122 w 0 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights,� 1VIN • �55118 � -� - 452 • 1850 � �-': : ' � � a r J City o� .,., �.l 1Viendota Heights May 30, 1991 Mr. and Mrs. J. Bruber 1852 South Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Bruber: Your application for a Wetlands Permit for Pool will be considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, � which will be held on Tuesday, June 4, 1991. The Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in the Cour�il Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. The Planning Commission recommended 4-1 to approve your requested sixty-seven foot (67') Wetlands Permit. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, �'C'`!1ti" � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant KLB:kkb ..a � j: � . ��-.:1101 Victoria Curve ��1Viendota Heights, 1ViN •�55118 ` 452•1850 °'�� .:�� To: From: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 31, 1�91 Mayor, City Council and City Admini James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire� Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis Subject: CASE NO. 90-35: INTRODIICTION Duggan - Wetlands Permit for Fence Mr. Ultan Duggan, of 2331 Copperfield Drive, applied for a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a pool fence in September of 1990. Mr. Duggan appeared before the Planning Commission on September 25, 1990 and reviewed his application �ith the Commission. At the meeting it was noted that Mr. Duggan had not produced the requested signatures of consent from his immediate adjoining neighbors. (Please see attached Planning Commission minutes dated September 25, 1990.) The Planning Commission waived their recommended approval of the requested permit prior to the City Council meeting, Mr. Du removed from the City Council agenda of Oct applicant's request this agenda item was consideration. (Please see attached October letter.) DISCUSSION public hearing and . Later in the week, ggan requested to be ober 2, 1990. At the removed from Council 3, 1990 notification Mr. Duggan has requested that his application be placed on the June 4, 1991 City Council agenda for consideration. Mr. Duggan has submitted new plans for consideration that are included with your packet. He has changed the fence design from black vinyl clad chain link to a black wrought iron fence. The location of the fence remains the same as that reviewed by the Planning Commission. The fence is proposed to be within nineteen feet (19') of the Wetlands. (See attached plans, memo and Planners Report.) At the time of Planning Commission consideration, Mr. Duggan had not obtained signatures of consent from his immediate neighbors. City policy directs applicants to obtain signatures of consent from immediate neighbors, in cases involving single family properties, if the public hearing requirement is to be waived at both the Planning Commission and City Council level. Staff was aware that both of Mr. Duggan's neighbors had expressed opposition. � : r Mr. Duggan submitted the signature of consent from ane of his neighbors, Mr. Ahto Niemioja, on May 31, 1991 and this is attached. His ather neiqhborr Mr. DiCk Pllt��r has submitted a letter to the City on the behalf of the Copperfield Assaciation requesting that a public hearing be called on this Wetlands Permit due to the lack of signatures of cansent. ALTERNATIVES 1. Waive the require�ent far a publia hearing, consider the Planning Commission recommendation and make a decisian on the requested Wetlands Permit, 2. Require the public hearing, as requested by the Copperfield r Association, at the City Council level. Under this � alternative the applican� wauld be required �o submit a Certificate o� Abstract listing the names of all property owners within 350 feet. 5taff would then provide mailed and published notice 10 days prior �to the appointec� Council meeting da�e. M �• i At the September 25, 1990 meeting, the Planning Cammissian voted unanimously to waive their public hearing and to recommend that the City Council grant the requested Wetlands Permit for a Pool Fence. ACTIt�N REOIIIRED Consider ihe alternatives regardi.ng �the publ.ic hearing. I� �he City Council desires to implement �he Planning Commission recommendatian, they shauld pass a motion waiving the public hearing and granting a Wetlands Permit to allow construction„af a pool fsnce, as praposed, to within nineteen feet {19'} of the Wetlands. , AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 CASE NO. DUGGAN - WETLANDS � September 25, 1990 Page 4 missed. Mr. Iverson stated that he has also talked to Mr. Gryc regarding his proposal. In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr. Iverson stated that the proposed home will be a two story home and that he has submitted formal plans to the City for their review. Commissioner Duggan moved to recommend to the City Council that they grant a fourteen foot (14') established front yard setback variance and that City staff be directed to investigate the exposed pipe and pallet presently on Mr. Iverson's lot and identify any hazards if applicable. Commissioner Koll seconded the motion. , �� 90-35: PERMIT Mr. Ultan Duggan, 2231 Copperfield Drive, was present to discuss his request for a Wetlands Permit. Mr. Duggan explained that he lives adjacent to a pond in Copperfield. He stated that he has recently installed a pool within his back yard which is greater than the required one hundred foot (100') minimum setback from a Wetlands. He e�lained that he must install a protective fence as per the City's Pool Ordinance. He explained that he proposes to install the fence right up to the City�s scenic easement. Mr. Duggan explained that initially the proposed height of the fence was to be six feet (6') but that he has since lowered the height to five feet (5') as that is the minimum requirement for fence height as per the City's Pool Ordinance. Mr.Duggan explained that the proposed fence will be a black vinyl clad chain link fence. Mr. Duggan further explained that the fence design must be approved by the Copperfield Architectural Review Committee. Commissioner Koll stated that the fence will be located so close to the pond and wondered how the weeds will be cut. Mr. Duggan explained that a gate is proposed at the back of the fence for access to the back of the yard. He further ex�lained that the weeds will be growing in the scenic easement portion of the lot and that he cannot cut or mow the area as it is meant to be � September 25, 1990 Page 5 left natural. Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if Mr. Duggan has discussed his proposal with any of his neighbors. Mr. Duggan responded that Mr. Dick Putnam and a neighbor both e�ressed some reservations •with respect to the fence surrounding the entire backyard and the fact that it will be abutting the scenic easement. � AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 ABSTAIN: Commissioner Krebsbach questioned what type of landscaping is proposed. Commissioner Duggan explained that there will be uniformed shrubbery along the fence. Commissioner Krebsbach q�estioned if he has considered installing Evergreen trees. Mr. Duggan stated that they have installed thirty three (33) Evergreen trees at the back of his lot. Commissioner hearing. Commissioner DUGGAN Dreelan moved to waive the public Krebsbach seconded the motion. Commissioner Krebsbach moved to recommend to the City Council that they grant a wetlands permit..for the purpose of constructing a five foot (5') high black vinyl clad chain link fence at 2231 Copperfield Drive. Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion. DUGGAN CASE NO. 90-31: HEARING - EFH COMPANY - BATESVILLE CASKET - MINOR COMPREHENSIVE REZONING PLAN AMENDMENT Mr. Gene Happe, developer, and Mr. Mark Finnemann, .� architect, were present to discuss their request for a Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning to construct a 30,000 square foot C ity o� .l.l , � 1Viendota �-ieights October 3, 1990 Ultan Duggan 2231 Copperfield Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Duggan, y I am writing to formally notify you that, as you requested, ' consideration of your Wetlands Permit for a Pool Fence was removed from the City Council agenda for their meeting of October 2, 1990. Consideration of your Wetlands Permit has not been reschednled to any specific Council meeting. Please contact me when you are ready to have your application considered by City Council and we can schedule your item for the appropriate agenda date at that time. The Wetlands Ordinance and the Zoning Ordinance are not specific about the length of time an application may be tabled and still be valid. I believe that six months is a reasonable period of ti.me for the application. This will give you until April 3, 1991. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 452-1850. Sincerely, � � Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant cc: Tom Lawell, City Administrator 1101 Victoria Curve •1Viendota Heights,lViN • 55118 =�452•1850 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS September 26, 1990 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Di e Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi tan� J� ,i i SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-35: Duggan - Wetlands Permit DISCIISSION ,, � At their September meeting, the Planning Commission considered an applicat.ion .from Mr. IIltan Duggan for a Wetlands Permit to allow construction of a pool fence in his backyard. See attached staff memos and plans. � � • At the meeting, Mr. Duggan explained that the �fence height would be five feet �(5�j as per the City Pool Ordinance. Mr. Duggan's plans showed the fence to be six feet (6'). Mr.� Duggan also informed the Commission that this fence design must be approved by the Copperfield Architectural Review Committee which has not acted on this proposal yet. Since the Planning Commission meeting, staff has been� informed that Mr. Duggan's immediate neighbors..are not in favor of Mr. Duggan enclosing his back yard all the way to the scenic easement.• . � . RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended to waive the public�hearing and that the City Council grant the requested Wetlands Permit for a pool fence. � ACTION REOIIIRED If the City Council desires to implement� the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should pass a motion waiving the public hearing and approving the Wetlands Permit according to the site plan submitted. ��(� (� � C b U1. °� ( Yl v-C�Lr' �'�. �xc� � t v. e F��p 1 JED/KLB:kkb � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO September 19, 1990 TO: Planning Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Director Revin Batchelder, Administrative Assistant SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-35: Duggan - Wetlands Permit `'� DIBCIISSION , ♦ s Mr. Ultan Duggan, 2231 Copperfield Drive, lives adjacent to a pond in Copperfield. Mr. Duggan has installed a pool within his back yard which is greater than the required one hundred foot (100�) minimum setback from a�Wetlands, however Mr. Duggan must also install a protective fence per the City's Pool Ordinance. Mr. Duggan proposes to install that fence right up to the City � s scenic easement that protects the natural character of the pond. The fence is proposed to be a six foot {6' j high black vinyl clad chain link fence. ` � ACTION REOIIIRED Consider waiving the required public hearing, review the request with the applicant and make a recommendation to the City Council. '� JED/RLB: kkb � � .. • : a . ,. a a .; PLANNING REPORT DATE: CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ACTION REGIUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 25 September 1990 90-35 Ultan Duggan 2331 Copperfield Drive, Lot 7 Block 3, Copperfield Third Addition (see sketch) • Wetlands Permit 1. The applica�t is requesting a wetlands permit to construct a 6-foot security fe�ce within the lU0-foot wetlands setback for Pond 233W. The fence is required by the L.ife Safety Code to enclose the swimming pool located in Mr. Duggan's back yard. Tlie proposed fence will"be a 6-foot tall, vinyl clad, chain link fence. The vinyl cladding will be black. This coloration helps to reduce its impact when seen from a distance. The fence will surround the rear yard of the subject property and will be located on the side lot lines. Along ihe rear of the property adjacent to the pond, the fence will follow the scenic easement line established when the subdivisio� was approved. The scenic easement is inte�cled to protect the natural enviro�ment of the area directly adjacent to the pond. No structures, either temporary or permanent, including fences, are permitted within the sceRic easement. the scenic easement li�e as described on the plat drawing for this property runs across the property roughly paraliel to the shoreline of the pond. On the �orth property line, the line comme�ces at a point 27 feet landward from the ordinary high water mark. On the south property line, the easement measures 19 feet landward from ihe ordinary high water mark. The site plan included with the application indicates these dimensions a�d shows the fence to be co�structed along the sce�ic easement line. A copy of the description of the scenic easement is included for your review. 2. Section 6B Subd. 4 of the wetlands ordinartce requires a wetla�ds permit for the construction, alteration, or removal of any structure. The definition of a structure in tFfe ordinance (3.2 (134)) specifically i�cludes signs and fences. The wetland ordinance requires that structures constructed within the 100-foot required setback be located so as to minimize the removal of vegetation. There is little vegetation located on the subject property in the area of the proposed fe�ce and �o removal of vegetation is co�templated in order to accommodate the construction of the fence. Section 7.of the wetlands ordinance outlines the criteria used to evaluate whether a particular - actian that requires a permit is appropriate. Many of these criteria deal with dredging or activities within the wetland itself, or alterations to the shoreli�e. Few of the standards listed (there are twenty-three) apply directly to the installation �� Ultan Duggan, Case No. 9U-35 Page 2 of fences. One af these would be Iierr► 14, which requires ihat the • removal of vegetation witF�in the wetIands setback area be limited to that which is reasonably required far the placement of structures and the use of praperty. There is littte vegetation on the subject property in the area of the wetlands setback and no vegetation is anticipated to be removed as a resu2t of the installatian af ihe fence. The prapased fence will in no way affect ihe water quality or the rate of stormwater rur�off frarrt the subject property. Since the only soii disturbed during construction is for ehe digging af the post for the fence, there is na concern for any soil erosion entering the pond. 3. In conclusion, the propased fence meets all of ihe criteria necessary for ihe issuance of a wetlands permit as auiiined 'zn the wetlands ordinartce, .�, In addition, the fence is proposed to be located inside of the scenic _ $asemeni. Therefore, we see no problem with ihe applicants request. � ; t ' � s Ra - —___,_ � �c . , , � � �� ^ f - ; � � � ' ; . _,_ Q 4� . i . N.82°6�09`�E. � � 2 3 � �� /' , (�,Ot6 �t ( /G -- ' �-t257_38•-'." — — —..,� `'� - �- ~� - ;`� 7� ��s�" t01 '72 113 . 96 96 � 11S 61l ' ' 19p 1�� ' ^+� • • ,c�� — t -- N 2�19� O E 12 9. 9 8 �—' � �_ i N �O � Ii P i� Pi 7� • f '0'-J ! �' — F, i `� a 3 # i S( tl,� tl u 2G � � , � � � P � w - _ �� .. _ �To: te _ _ � zZ 2 � ;2 g4 '4:; � s�.s,� a� a,� . ti� � � t� �. 1 � � � s ra : � . xsa rt � `.. 2 � 4 a� "' so aa - 1 79 t � „ 7D �.i. � «Ni 63• �SY "--y^'-+ t9. 34 67 76 O�' '�� ..tl.t9 50 r J I 3 �,�� eg6 l,�q �� !�'�6�.1j :z� b �'6i. � I72.Qs _ r � / / � 4 . � � ix 3t 67 76 �9 �� +,:., f.1G�8 � n . 2i � �tj�F f ' � ��}� �h !2 ^ p '3 N �,N �te=4 � � O'+ w l8 � �* e 'se a6 m tt � �� ?�.+ : rs 2 0 � �� od `?Y � h �3 . �'� A N M 1 � t 9 !� �� ^ o °9s o �6 � . i �6 � ro l� � f 7 1 js �$ ,,, s,�qo p? �p ry1 t �� - _ �� * � � � ¢3�� 6V 'a ss'?? � g � s �''a o \ / O,ry + ��* � � 'w ) tg SS e'!d ~ ' � .ti p ' 4 f ` �, sA ;e g h� sr.d e "'- := .,^---,... I PLA TAIL17 `,�--�32ea � ��,�s CQ.��``�'�, a p " � r \ /` *�o C_ �° a,� J� s ,P �,,; � RI�` *e < w'b' � \ `y� `a� ' 2 w �Dp� %t`i '6'd:: �,�� s w � 5 k tU �t's \ �, w 3 fl�� eo � .� ¢ � �+e b ; '�2t' ♦ a1 i i �,,� ♦ � 7t.72 � 7 :1 0 ? �. so� ` �Y � `. °a xo"? w ,� 4 a s .� s o . ,�1 '! 1D � p f j�? / � �.�'� �! O �O y7 �, ♦ .M � I 4 ' ' 47 `� 'L6 5 °� �� ! , � � „' �' 4A ap � p Q � � y �2 '� i �A6.�t �� 1° e � :.+5� xo2 as StIB�, ,•.� '` � 29 fi � � , �' E�T pR�pE�'T 3 6 ,v.::::. � , ., � 8 4 .:ii';.v' �f`'� _ .l _ 3 M ' t ,f.s'r,� 4'i. � f��: � ;r,.,}ti�.;'}f8.�''; c7 �n � ra.es � , � �.�r`�,!y�, �;-c� �kd �3 NQ,R.�. �► $ � ;�ir�:f -``:�� « m :G;::.;....r .<r f �',�� o, C J .� f�.: ,fr� :,: :=�nrr r � , S q�E w '.. �:::: .-�',�,.f..`�.�� _ a x : y .-2Q�� . � �.�;,�:,;.r�. P y -,,, o a .o ` �39.79 (4 ? ♦ �� a �� m � `� � � v w � ` �d° �*O'c pARK � �� a� z'4 �Z � . .� ♦ g . �•.,'�?s . ?�` " ^ �=' : � ,*�. ,s � �, ,a�9 p pA! � 1 9 � � � � .�, 6* ,�" s a \ �. �� Q'6 lQ p• 'OP 62 •� iI� �a SE a 'i'� 9 e� � � 1'� �� !�, �° � s c t6 � '�� • �\`\ r � �`�'—�- � -"' � � `ny ¢o ar'3��., �.:.g � �o` �4 8 �i'6� � � �O �•'�a • aa � s+ e ao�- �� r � � � o� ' �r s� as $1,0 ,�T �F t��71 0 �-+ Zy�. '* O 3p . ��C�. i � r a v� i „'�� T °'•• `w � �i � '� � �c CT 1 \' .j s o a` b •? N �� ` be � � C! i `� "p N � z ii � ro� �� ` • 1e •' ~ � Q� �\�, •p• � ��' s . .9� � `qi S�� 6 a2.36 `y0� 2 T9.97 w 1\\ �.,�T.../ '"�� a � • OO � Y � � ��, `l\ +A o 3 v a� �� a "�" :r i� � i, �� .h N .5 p . s .,F�, \ 2�6 �R � �. N �' � � "� z " "6 `� � . . ' � - �.,,, �,o• � M 9 \ �1 PARK o t ,,, N '"` ` � '.a „ » 1, �pp� •.�.'�•.,, � � �� y 2 � - �% �6.0! � �� t� � �� *? 1 O � / . � � «6. �T � t63 � y� )� « , °J�� :-� ' 3 . �'t-� � � 10 �. .�`� � t7i ,.�-? • �; . • �+j � e '."�a — , � ..� '�\ S ' — _ r �! 1 ' N tl� ry � 69 / O! \•, � 9 � «' ♦ �d p �� M ` a� . �- � � ! f � � / � � � � r =j 1si�,pt•��0 �� 'L1«n � .. `` I �� -� � , 7 .�. .� � �. . F .� � . 1 , _ �� =---i—'�_�---� ~-- -�— -J (—.._ _�� . _�. � -- -- c-� c� r------� �::.,� -------_._ --� �._.�. � :�,�- •' .� �, -- � . , + - : � ' (' � �'i f . � • t O' c , . H � . �' �% � � � �._ • � • . l� � • , p i ,� i � ' . : ': ' ,, o � '� � _ - '--_ : (f � F � '`i-L �. �l , � "�- " ' e. / 1 � ;.�: c � i �..---= r �, :: _ `r��.• tY` -.• POOGE 1� 3 ItATURE ' 1 CENTE � \• � :<. ;,y' _ - _"y�' \ � f s ` •. � ! 4� — _ ..._. » � • � • • ♦ • • i 1 '� � '"'. � ,. r; _ . � > =' . . i . . ... w+�� jj � _ ` cr` t t . �+ �` ��----++�� . cs.,j�:.. � �• . \1.�. � •• t �. .� � �i¢ X7� � 3 �P ^ � ' �M� '. ^...� - ! �.� 1 � � � ��i�� • -� �"t ' �Y . \ � =__ �+'�'� . .� u \ ., . �.•• �i_ •1 � •�*' i � f � ' �' �� . .y ., � � , .� ;,.. .. � -. � � � . >- �; r; � •� i' - a -' o � � -.= � • " b r� a. + �� _„�.o.c� " co. [wscrcwr y r• --• �. -r^ y+��.: .�. � ssa � • ' ' ' �'(�� . - : .Z'• �� f � . .._ f1 Y MARSH ' �. � • • • • + y + ` • � � �� ' � � # :' l._ . � . ��"`y--�--• "•t.. "C% ~ � � � -AARIC , . ' ` • • • t� • ` • ; ti ! '»'� � . ... �• * �\\ •i` • ♦ � • • • � � ` r x' I y _ • ' \ • ` � ' . + . . � •� � • l • � • � �� . • : �' • � �,_. _ • 1 • � � �.. • : ` . .. L _ • . ;.; � • • . • CL`y��,..'. . . - --„ . , - t"}:� . . ��__ , . , .. „r•G--�' _ .�.�• • . • - . . • . . . , . . . , -�. t , . :'�.- .:` �: ', . . . •, . • �•.. , - - - :- :_- . , .. • . • ."7 --�. _ . _ , . • . : ' ' . • •• " • . • ' _— � -� . ' � � � : � • � • 4 • • l � _ �_ • • . + 7{ +'�{ • ! • � � f � � • a J— .� O� f • '\i £ { • • • � ' �� • � • � � • K y �,s�_ � i � ! • + . �"""`^� • !. --�;� � h • . 1 / 4 t'. �". � • •. �, � ¢ -�'.. �:.,. ' : . . �'T � � . . . . , � w ' •� � . '.�/ • : • . ' .-7/ r„4- / : �� . ' • � � . . f�i.+ � s.� � • �.� • • � / Q �' 't • f • : ••� �. •'S{ £x• • i . � + � • • • � . • y • • f � '• t �� ac K • � � . �,.-�� _ -. .z M • - � ,.,s ` ` � � - � � � � � �"' • ` • • -?J . - ,��', " s • a e + 6 , _�.. �' � s� _ ' � J.(�. "�, ' -•' : ''.• • Q • � _ '1 • � � ' • • • �•� �� 4 • �• • '� y � ~ �•. •'\ • ••_ •• . � � •• .y4 � Q \ •� • • • �,� ~ .t' '� • ' • • t . •'��' • ! • t h t�.*�. • f * �` � �i � � ' }�` ,,.. 1 x �! • • _ � • a ♦ • � . : - � ' � . . � i • tg' � �,�r�.� � � + • � ♦ • • ' #. � ' � � � /1-- +� � � f . -r'"�•-L^T.• � 'r • • � \\Ati' ' � � • , •: t • � . , • � • s � � • � A . ♦ • -• • • � SUBJEGT PRt}PERTY � . �' ~ � � s- : • � � �� . ♦ _ J " • • � ' "' . _ ...__ '.r ..�. _ ' + � ,,,. :. '� � ` NORTH 2S21rt , :.;: � _•:� w�eus ' + �B�l+OOaEO , ,�� ,�� .o, 4 '�CALE �1 "--800' R� ; _ � • — , • • � , _ ZZ� wl . J: � t♦` • a � �• , �r`�t � x . ` ,� � ' _. . 'r•.•. ` y... �' a..- s—"'' �� i ., - ,�� M_ ' � AOA• 't \ . � '" ��,i�� F �.��..�''\ „�� o - _._ _ � i � . �• ��~ ., a :/ � � / � ' '•'� - Zy�'K= � � _.. . . . � _..--'-�-...v� . ^� w� �?f � _ _ - w . .. . . � � . . �. � �'. .. � z� � ..�^A� j ' I "S�t— � � t � _ _ , I ' \ �� x ' � . I ' S ` y .. � 1 � , �d' ' � O � �.^ ; � ! i� .`4 . • Yt `wf r 1 � a , ,.� --.... 's . �/,ar:�.,' � .. ' {�� . � "'.t = : — ` ; �[{,',. _ ,� a\..Qo„w+«.�,;,7 ' f �� . . " . � '+J-l�i' Z� h �� •i ,' ~ � � `•� ' � ..,, , � `�,� , • � � 1' " - � + . J ' � <• , , . .. . .. . /��`', � ~ � �. , _ / � t � _� e ,i �s . f � . . •"1"� '` - ,~AI". . . �� t�/1�• ' � . �r. & i . . n k.. �w�}:.� r.:. '� : " � � �� L � � r.� �� v+ • � '"• �� • �... ��"'�ry;� VCn��M^ —Ry�[l �� — •'�F"A�� - '� rS I.yC R�M� �� J y • - , _ ��.:� :'.��=". . . . _ _'�'.. • * _ � ... . .. _ . _ .. _ _ .. . . • . _ . . L a l C ity o� .,., .,� 1Viendota Heights APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Applicant Name• ' l V � Address: 23.3 ( (Number & Street) f OwnerName: V • �) Address: �(Number & Street) Case No. `-'1 V"— �� J Date of Application Q - ( $-�� Fee Paid i�� .(7(7 t%�.,t� n.'.-�.�3 Street Location of Properiy in Question: Legal Description of Property: Z`ype of Request: Rezoniug � Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit for P.0 D. P1an.APProva1 Comprehensive Plan Amendment � Applicable CYty Ordinance.Number 2 _ 0 � t'%,✓ �h (S�) (�P) (� (S�) C�P)� . _ 1' � o � � Variance ubdivision Approval ��Wetlands Pemut . Other (attach explanation) Section Fresent Zoning of ProPeriY �^-� '-- Present Use K� c�_�c-,.. c� . Proposed Zoning of ProPertYd—_ Proposed Use �_.- , I hereby declare that all stai:ements made in this request and ��✓t ditional material are true. /� � (� n _ _ �y � � `�� 537�-0 (Signature of Applicant) � � c� � g Qv � (R ived by - Tifle) . . ' .... • . .r. :a•..., ....: , . ,.. �.i ..: _-.s_-• u.....ea• . • .,..._ ... .. - ,. ..... ,'F-u•�, .. , .. . _ ,. ,,.r•a.,... 1101 Victoria Curve � -1Vieridota �Heights; `1ViN = �55118 . ' � 452 • 1850 ' � C ity o� .�. � . � 1Viendota HeiglZts September 28, 1990 Mr. Ultan Duggan 2331 Copperfield Drive Mendota Heights, NIlJ,55120 Dear Mr. Duggan: Your application .for a �ef'lav.cSl-S �� 'f will be ,� � � considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled meeting, which' will be held on Tuesday, f�-4�be�- - 2 .. The council meeting starts at 7:30-o•�clock��P.M.�here-at Citp Hall�in the.Council Chambers. �You,-or a representative, should plan on attending the meeti.ng, in order that your application will receive Council consideration. - � � a The Planning Commission -recommended _ a,�Pr�v�.� o� your r��sf �� C�f-., �uK� � � ��- �. .�.�-e �ti�- E 1 S�'� �-c� c� - ' . If you have any questions, please feel.�free�to contact me. - Sincerely, - . (�,(,�n^.., j�c��:f..�;e.��1�— Revin Batchelder � .. . � Administrative Assistant � °• RLB:kkb � � -. � 0 * � �. ° � • ' . . . .. ` � . � 1101=:victoria��Ciirve��;� �� ei� �` � ti��'�� ` � � •1Vieiidota;'H .ghts`,�1ViNr=";v5118�452="1850��.::�;;:� -t:<:. . � � �: ., . . ,: ?' ' :x `"' '% �:nr� a,�c; - � r�±^:.� _ � r.,..t• ,x , `•' y� :.�s," ' ,�.: }.. � .,+,i:��. .�.-; - �� :�. . ' " . , %�y° _ Y'�i - .:.?.�� Y`�'x. ;.r`:1t"S..e C.'��7'�,�.;.=;+•. ...r_. ��s ._. s?c `. �.. - ...�.:.JT. �.s` a,<�,. ..,ti. �.:...�i.� ,� �'r :; 0 Clty Q� •�• � • � �Jier�do�a �-Ieights . . Septeinber 21, 1990 Mr. U1tan Duggan 2331 Copperfield Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Duggan» • Your application for a��{"��5 j�"+et`v�ni'�"~ �v�C.�will be �� r considered by the Planning Commissian at their next regularl.y saheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, (�c {abe.r 2� l�t 5t O, The Planning Commission mesting sta.r�ts at 7:30 o'clock P.M:, here at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, o� a representative should plan an a�tending the meeting, in order that your applicat�ion will receive Commission consideration. If you have any questions,�please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, i��/'4/�w+ 1IY ti'n �`��Q/�M/ �' 1 Kevin Ba.tchelder Admi.nistrative Assistant 1.iQ1 Victoria Curve -1Vi,endota HQights, ,?t�N -,�,��Zg 452•1850 s� � ,� �, � m . . , _ .. .. , .._ r• _ .�, __., . .. .. < . . . . .. r ,. . �. . �� u_r . , ... ,. ; r • .. � . . . ' . .., ' ' . � „ ' . '^ ,r . . . E� 5/31/91 To whom it may concern: We have seen and discussed the plans for Ultan and Terri Duggan's fence at 2331 Copperfield Drive. The plan indicates the fence will be constructed of black wrought iron on the . � front and both sides but will be vinyl clad chain link at the back. It will be between five and six feet high. It will be , � placed at least 6 inches in from the adjoining property lines. The Duggan's wish to place the back of the fence close to the pond rather than 75 feet in from the pond which is specified in the Copperfield covenants. We agree that this is acceptable to us. However, our preference would be that the fence surround the immediate pool area only in order to preserve the natural beauty in the pond area. We also would prefer that the _ entire fence be constructed of wrought iron. Residents of 2307 Copperfield Drive . � y2�--��c¢'"�.� � G��. Ahto & Linda Niem' a ; ;, � � ; . . . .. �• � � ! i ! —� o �„� � f� �y r -T � � � ��t✓� 2,. ��.;� cc� f �� S �30 %( � .2 33 / ��:� �� . U�'��..r/'�`u ll�r• /)-�.�� ' ,.e �o �� ,--�G�--�i ". � �� -�, ��r . � �- . � %''�%�� k�� .�-�s,..Q._. . �--� � e,� ,,� `� W �� c�.,,� �.. � �� ..�� t�./ ,.9�vd�` ..�Zr' C� �t/�.� ft-� .. -�-` �z.v� �� Gti.�C--� , . ��%Z'L:/LyG�--11—t 2..c-P [.t"l�x� �..f7.�rt C:.-rC� C!.�t-tn. ./^'�G r��---' r� a '�1 �.r'��:�.,�C. /`�J�--'"r/7 --Q..+C.Cl'�'-.f/ i�(��i�`V (,l./i� , ��/} � 'WL.c � U`�i-� f1_.. ��'� / i ,�,�C --�--��. tr . a '.r �'��^"`� �,� L�� - � . � � - C.�,n'�..d �,P r�.� .--�;-e-✓��e c.�r^c� d� _,sz-K � 'ra��V ! :�.v. � ^ a C�9 ��/�*'tt i o ��i s�.-.,-ti. < � !"b � � ,"�_ , 1 � ,, /LJ.t�,.c�r 1��--�`� � .� _ sI311� �, From : R. A. Putnarn � Assoc, Inc Tandem Corp. C612)471—�573 May. 30. 1991 12:52 PM ._�-.• � •.' . TAN��EM P02� � � Jemes L. Oslenson coR�a��rxaN . a,�h8rd A, pu� BRUK�ttS � PI.ANN�Yts . DF_VCLaYLXS May 28, i991 Mendota t-Ccights City Counctt 1101 ViCtaria Gurvc Mandota Heights� MN 55118 RG: Duggan Wetiand Permit 6/4/9i City Council Agend� 6440 Flying Gloud privt, Edcn Prairie, MN 55344 /(612) 941-1070 l7�car Mayor and C;ty Caut,cii Mombers: , . .� �pr Architcctural i2ovicw Committee in Cppperfieid has rcccivcd a requcst by Mr. and Mrs. Duggan to build a fcnce withitt the wetland setback arca. Our cammittee st�ted aur conoern abaut the S fppt Ch�inlink foncc lacated adjacent to the �eenic ��sement last ycar whcn Mr. Duggan proposcd thc praject. . Qur committcc feeis that the signifioanee of the feneo will affcct a!I pond praperty owners in Copperfield. Our dcsign paliCy has beo� to restrict rear yard fencln� adjaeent ta ponds to thC grr� gdjaCent to th� rear patios, pools, ctc. Duggaa's rcqucst is a r�dical dcparture fram tho CoppCrfield poliGy. ThGrCfOre, our Committeo will b� asktng a}1 the pond property ownete their opinian rogarding fonci�ng, out bui�dings� konnols or othcr improvcmcnts ad jaccnt to thc ponds. It is our undcrstanding that a pubtic hcarin$ was ncvcn c�ld snd wc wcre not awarc of the last Plsnnin& Cammission rncct3ng. Cppperfield Associates still owns the 1ot �djacet�t to Duggan's and lvtr. �nd Mrs. Nicmioja own the ed jacent north lot. I dqn't bCtievo eithCr owner h�s signod a waivcr of public hearing. ,. I havc cnclascd � copy of Mr. Auggen's letter end plett for your informatiort. Our cammittee asks thc City Cauncil to call e pabtic hcaring �s rcquircd by thc city codcs and allow thc Copperficld ow�c�s and Archltcctural xtcvicw Committcc to commcnt on thc wctlaed parmit rcqucst. . � If you havc any qucstions plcasc fccl froe to givc mc a call at 47�-pS73 or Joan Bjorklund at 454-5537. Thank you for your oo�sidaratian. SietCCrCly� r'�7`� I�ick Putnam COpperfiCld Associatcs Arehitectur$i Reviow Co�nmitte� cc: U. Dugggn � � ]`. Bjorkiund C. Betz ��' ..� r� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS May 31, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ��" SUBJECT: Discussion of Soccer Field Needs INTRODIICTION At our last Council meeting, a number of representatives from the Sting Soccer Program were� present to discuss the shortage of soccer field space within the community. Staff was directed to arrange a follow-up meeting to discuss the issue and report back at the June 4th meeting. DISCIISSION On Tuesday, May 28th, interested parties met at City Hall to explore the field availability issue. Those present at the meeting included Councilmember Blesener, Parks Commission Chair John Huber, soccer representative John Bruder, Patrice Bataglia and several staff inembers. Mr. Bruder indicated that the most urgent need for field space was this summer, as the ten team soccer league he represents has no available field space for June and July. The group then sought to identify locations where field space could be obtained and agreed to investigate space at Sibley High School, St. Thomas Academy and Brady High School. Although Mr. Bruder had originally proposed to construct a soccer field at Mendakota Park, he recognized the work which had gone into the design of the complex and indicated that if immediate space could be found, he and his fellow soccer coaches would no longer pursue the modification of the Mendakota plan. One option which proved particularly attractive was the concept of utilizing for soccer practice an area south of Sibley High School which is currently scheduled for softball use. As you may be aware, turf growth at the fields constructed by the City at Sibley last year has been remarkably good given our recent wet weather. Growth has been particularly good on the two new softball fields and it would be reasonably ea�sy to reschedule softball games from the two south fields to the two north fields, thereby making the south area available for soccer practice. . � _ , �� Based on advice from our engineering staff, the earliest date we should make the new fields available is July 1, 1991. The Sting Soccer Program concludes at the end of July, thus the new fields would only have to be used for thirty days. Subsequent conversations with Dr. Bruce Anderson resulted in his sending the attached letter wherein he agrees to make space available at Sibley with two minor conditions. 1. The practice field should be oriented north-south to avoid goal areas utilized by fall varsity soccer. 2. The City is to provide the temporary soccer goals. 1 The first condition causes no concern at all, and the second condition is easily met through the purchase of two sets of soccer goals. Two portable goals were already included in the specifications and budget for Mendakota Park, and an additional goal set would certainly be needed by the City in the fu�ure. I believe that the arrangement described above satisfies the short term needs of all concerned, and I recommend that we accept the offer set forth by Dr. Anderson in his letter. In addition, I recommend that the Council authorize staff to issue a purchase order for two additional goals in an amount not to exceed $1,200. ACTION REOUIRED Should the Council wish to adopt the staff recommendation, direction should be given to staff to work with the School District in rescheduling the activities at Sibley High School for the month of July, and to purchase two additional goal sets in an amount not to exceed $1,200. MTL:kkb ' �AY-31-1991 10�04 FROM ISD #197 DISTRICT OFFICE TO 4520949 ._.� . `� ,�'nd�enden� Sc�'iooC Dis�rici o.197 - ,. Serving West Saint Paul, M�ndota Heiyhts, Lilyda�e, Mendofa, Sunfish Lake and portions of Eagan and /nver Grove Heighrs 1897 Delaware Avenue • West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55118 .(612} 681•230Q M�y 3a.,199i Mr. Tom Lawell CiLy Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 Deas Tom, The dilemma you are facing regarding the need space for soccer practice during Ju3y has been reviewed by District personnel. We believe it is a very wise d'ecision not to use the new soccer fisld which is a patt of our jaint effort, and have some coneera about the readiness of the so#�ball fields, However, we will trust the judgment of your personnei regarding the readiness of the iatter. The field immediateIy t�o the south of �the high schooI wi3i be made available during the month of July for soccer practice with the following understanding: 1. Z`3�►e practice field be laid out on a north-south basis under the gttidance of Dean Verdoes, and 2. The City of Mendota Heights suppIy the iempoz�ary goals. Regarding broader city-school cooperative efforts, after conversation with Mr. Verdoes and our two elementary principals in Mendota Heights, we will be sharing needs which hopefully could be addressed cooperatively. Sincerely, �C�GC',C Bruce R. Anderson Superintendent of Schools BRA1km Joseph P. Polski, Chair Kathryn L. Haight, Clerk Dennis P. Barrett, Treasurer BruCe R. Andsrson, Superintendent of Schoo(s 'WE ARE A MEMBER OF AN EQUAL OPPORTUNlTY COMMUNITY' Patrice Batagfia, Director Robert M. Doffing, Director James T. Nikolai. Director � ;t-�f � JUN 03 '91 16�15 MN MUTUAL-GRP SALES June 3, 1991 Mendota Heights City F€all Mayor and Ci.ty •Council 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 5511.8 To: Mayor and City Counc�l � P.2i2 Thank you for listening and givinq your attention to our problem addressed at the May 21st City Council meeting. As we pcinted out, we have over 150 Mendota Heights residents playing Soccer in the summer ieagues and Mendota Heights does not provide one soccer field. This is a critical problem, as we currently are essentially without practice space and have had to cance]. games due to field shortages. On Friday Toin La.well compieted negotiations with 8ruce Ariderson of the Sibley Area School District for a very nice soccer field re].ief package. Starting July 1 we will be able to use the field direct3.y south of Sibley School as a practice field only. On two previous occasions, we had been turried dowri for use of this field. However, Tom's proposal o€ help from Mendota Heights in the event the fields became too compact due to over-usage was appareritly enough to get movement on the issue. Tom also agreed to provide portabie goals and nets whfch can later be used at Kennsingtfln. While we are sti3.1 short of ineeting our field needs, this arrangement helps significantly in dealing with what was a real crisis fo= our program. Tom did an outstanding job in serving as a catalyst to solve this crisis. We also want to thank others who provided a helping hand with this. We are very pleased with the shart-term outcome. In the long haul, we wi13 have to work more closely with the City to sol.ve our space needs. Changes at Mendakota, while nice for us, are not worth the cost. Thanks again, �� . Keith Campbe2l Representing the Sibley Sting Program and Coaches CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 29, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ a�- FROM: John P. Maczko Fire Chief SUBJECT: Resignation of Assistant Fire Chief Bill Lerbs INTRODUCTION• It is with deep regret that I must inform you that Assistant Chief Bill Lerbs has requested to resign his position and step back to the ranks of firefighter. DISCUSSION• Bill's intentions at resign his position, help chief and then retire from 31, 1992. r this time, as stated to me, are to train in the new assistant fire the fire department on December I have worked with Bill ever since I have been on the department coming up through the ranks and for the past 5.5 years Bill has been my assistant fire chief. Bill has done a lot for the department in his tenure with the department and also in his tenure as assistant chief. He will be sorely missed in that position but he will not be dissolving himself from the department, just winding down towards retirement. I and the membership have asked Bill to stay on as ' assistant fire chief until he retires, however Bill has emphatically stated that is not his desire and he wishes to step down at this time. With the resignation of Bill we will have to pick a replacement. Bill has stated that he is willing to stay on as assistant chief as long as needed as long as the process to pick his successor is started in a timely fashion. As you recall, there was a process established in 1984 when the assistant chief and chief were selected. My proposal is that we follow a similar process, listed as follows: 1. Posting of description and soliciting resumes from interested applicants. 2. Written responses to several questions, developed by myself and City Administrator Tom Lawell, of all intere�sted applicants. j 3. The establishment of a selection board to review the responses to these questions and conduct oral interviews with the applicants. I would suggest the same makeup of the selection board that was used in 1984 with the composition being, the city administrator, police chief, two city council members, mayor, two members of the fire department (selected by the membership) and myself. The selection board would then make a recommendation for selection to the City Council for confirmation. Proposed Time Table Post job description and solicit resumes ► Distribute questions to . applicants and receive responses Selection of 2 members from the fire department oral interviews Recommendation for Formal appointment RECOMMENDATION• June 5 - June 26 July 8 - July 2.� July 17 August 10 August 20 I recommend that the City Council accept Bill's resignation and'formally thank him for his last 5.5 years as assistant chief. Council should also discuss the process to fill Bill's position as proposed and direct staff to proceed accordingly. �-, l JPM:�dfw r � - '► ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF POSITION SUMMARY - In the absence of the Fire Chief, the Assistant Chief shail perform all functions and exercise ail authority of the Chief. The Assistant Chief will also provide general staff support to the Chief carrying out specific duties as requested. The Assistant Chief will also be given primary responsibility for specific duties. POSITION RESPONSIBILITIES/DUTIES - Tlie Assistant Fire Chief shall be considered second in command and shall: 1. Be under direct supervision of the Chief of the department. 2. Assist the Chief in the administration of the entire department. .� . 3. During the Chief's absence, assume all responsibilities and exercise all authority given to the Chief. 4. Respond to fires and other emergencies as paged. 5. Enforce all rules, regulations, and orders of the department. 6. Perform any duties that the Chief may direct. 7. Pass a Fire Department physical. 8. Remain in the position until he/she retires, resigns, or is removed by the City Council. POSITION REQUIREMENTS - The same general requirements will be required for the Assistant Chief as were required for the Chief. The selection process for the Assistant Chief will be the same with the exception that the Chief of the department will sit on the interview board in place of the Fire Chief from a neighboring community. POSITION RELATIONSHIPS - The Assistant Fire Chief reports directly to the Chief. All reprimands and disciplinary actions shall be handled by the Chief. 3-4 m � FIRE CHIEF POSITION SUMMARY - The Fire Chief shall be the head of the Mendota Heights Fire Department and have full control thereof, and each and every member of the department, including all other officers, shall be subject to the orders of the Chief. He/she shall be considered by the City as a member of the city staff and a department head. He/she_ shall be responsible for the purchase, care and maintenance of all equipment, apparatus, and buildings that are part of the Mendota Heights Fire Department. He/she shall also be responsible for the training of all fire personnel, necessary reports to the proper city and state officials, and submitting a budget showing needs of the department each year. The Fire Chief presides at all meetings of the department and is responsible for the discipline and operation of the department. POSITION RESPONSIBILITIES/DUTIES - The Chief shall: 1. Have full control over all apparatus, equipment, supplies, and persons who are members of the department. 2. Be responsible for enforcing policies and procedures of the fire department and prescribe and enforce such rules and issue such orders as he may deem advisable. 3. Respond to fires and other emergencies and, upon arrival, assume full command thereof. 4. Keep a record of all fires and causes of and losses incurred in such fires as accurately as such causes and losses can be determined. He shall also forward necessary forms to the proper city and state officials. Preliminary estimates`of damage shall in no way be construed as being binding in an insurance loss adjustment. 5. Supply monthly reports to the City Administrator and Council as to the monthly activities of the department pertaining to training, meetings, and run activity. 6. At the end of the year, submit a report of the year's activities and major happenings to the proper City officials. 7. Be responsible for being at Council meetings as needed. 8. Be responsible to see that training be conducted at least monthly to allow members to meet minimum requirements for training. 9. Work cooperatively with the Fire Marshal to see that an adequate program of inspections and other fire prevention preparation measures are carried out. 3-1 10. From time to time, advise the proper City authorities of the needs of the department, caused by changing conditions and developments of the City and make such recommendations in writing as he deems necessary. He shall also recommend the acquisition of new apparatus, equipment and supplies. All purchases for the department shall be subject to approval by the Chief and he shall present his reasons, in writing, when in his opinion, the city is best served by the sale or disposal of apparatus, equipment or supplies, and make such special report upon any matter which in his judgement requires the attention of the City Administrator or City Council. 11. Each year, after an evaluation discussion with fire department personnel, submit to the City Administrator for approval, a detailed budget estimate of the � requirements for the next fiscal year, including an estimate of additions, replacements, or repairs to apparatus, equipment and buildings. 12. Preside at regular or special meetings and notify all members of such meetings. He shall call any other special meetings at the written request of five members of y the department or when deemed necessary. Such request shall state the subject of the meeting. 13. Form committees as needed. Upon forming the committee, he shall instruct the committee as to their duties and obligations. We may also be a member�bf any or all committees. 14. Place on Inactive Status any member for just cause subject to the policy and procedures. All such actions shall be reported to the City Administrator. Reference shall be made to the standard operating procedures section that warrants the discipline. 15. Remain in the position until such time as he retires, resigns, or is removed by the City Council. 16. Give, along with the Captain and Assistant Chief a written and oral performance evaluation of each member of the department (inviting feedback on the evaluation). POSITION REQUIREMENTS - The Chief must have: 1. Thorough knowledge of firefighting methods and procedures. 2. Knowledge of fire prevention methods and procedures. 3. Knowledge of firefighting equipment. 4. Six (6) years minimum firefighting experience. 5. Leadership capabilities and potential ability to define and communicate to others the proper role of the fire department as it relates to the needs of the community and the rest of the City. 6. Administrative ability - budgeting, record keeping, and development of procedures. 3-2 j•f�v `w 7. Completed a significant amount of study in extra curricular coursework pertaining to training and fire fighting procedures. Such areas of study shall include: Instructor/officer training Fireground command Tactics Management Hazardous materials 8. Shall pass a Fire Department physical. The Chief will be picked by an interview board consisting of the City Council, representatives of their choice, the City Administrator, the Police Chief, and a Fire Chief from a neighboring volunteer fire department, and two members of the fire department that are appointed by the general membership. After all interviews are completed, the interview board shall make a recommendation to the City Council for formal approval at a future Council meeting. � POSITION RELATIONSHIPS - 0 The Chief reports directly to the City Administrator. 3-3 � r�� M �.�J��: D � � 1 l .. ''D 0 ' D :' INCORPpRATED CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 300 FIRST AVENUE NORTH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 G12•339•3300 MEMORANDUM DATE: 31 May 1991 TO: , Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Tim Malloy, Consulting Planner RE: Summary of the Southeast Area Scoping Study The Southeast Area of Mendota Heights has been the subject of considerable concern over the years. This area was the focus of a land use study that was conducted by our firm in 1985 and resulted in an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan. The proposed amendment, which included medium and high density residential uses, met with resistance at that time by the residents of the single-family neighborhoods that were located adjacent to the study area. Figure 1 shows the boundaries of the original study area. The most recent chapter of this area's history is marked by the denial of a request for a rezoning and preliminary plat approval to allow a mixed use residential project proposed by the Centex Corporation and Tandem Inc. The corporations subsequently iiled a lawsuit against the Ciry. In addition to the issues related to the Kensington project, as the mixed use PUD project is known, the City has expressed concern regarding several other factors affecting the ultimate development of the Southeast Area. T'he principal land use related concerns expressed throughout the process of reviewing the Kensington project were: airport noise, traffic, and parks. Another obvious concern regards the project's compatibility with the surrounding, predominantly single-family residential neighborhoods, particularly the recently developed areas directly north of the subject property. In response to these concerns, the City has commissioned Dahlgren, Shardlow, and Uban, Inc., together with the transportation planning firm of Short, Elliot, Hendrickson, to • reexamine the land use issues within the portion of the Southeast Area that contains the largest remaining developable property. The overall intent of the study is to identify an appropriate land use pattern for the area within the study boundary based on current conditions and to prepare the necessary materials for an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan should one be required. The reduced study area is bounded on the north by Mendota Heights Road and on the South by Interstate 494. The eastern boundary is defined by Delaware Avenue and the western boundary coincides with the eastern property line of the first phase of the Kensington development (see Figure 2). Southeast Area Scoping Study 31 May 1991 Page 2 What follows is a summary of the findings of the first phase of this study. The purpose of this phase is to identify whether changes have occurred in key development factors since the original Southeast Area Study was done. At the end of this phase, a recommendation will be made regarding whether to continue the study and identify the issues to be examined in the remaining phases. Based on the information in this phase, the Ciry may redeiine its goals and policies regarding development in the study area. The key factors that will be examined in this phase include: airport noise, traf�c, sunounding land use and property ownership, and park and recreation needs. These factors were selected because they are the ones most likely to have changed signif'icantly in the intervening six years since the original study was conducted and because they are the issues that generated much of the concerns expressed during the meetings for the Kensington Phase II project. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP In 1985, when the original study for this area was done, Interstate 494 was nearing completion along the south side of the City. Due to the Southeast Area's proximity to both I-494 and the soon-to-be completed final leg of I-35E into downtown St Paul, the City was experiencing pressure to rezone the area, which was then designated for very low density residential use, to allow increases in the densiry of development. The Ciry recognized the need to carefully reassess its land use policy for the Southeast Area and undertook the Southeast Area Study. The 1985 Study included an inventory of natural features such as topography, vegetation, soils, wetlands, and stormwater runoff. Since none of these factors has changed significantly within the cunent study area, we will not be reviewing them at this time. Figure 3 illustrates the basic land use and transportation pattern surrounding the Southeast Area at the time the original study was conducted. The area was surrounded primarily by single-family residential development and parks and open space land. The exceptions to this condition included the Visitation School and St. Thomas Academy High School, which together formed the northern boundary for the nanow portion of the study area located west of Dodd Road and south of Mendota Heights Road. In addition, the entire study area was bounded on the south by I-494. This principal arterial roadway forms a substantial barrier between Mendota Heights and the office/industrial development occuning south of the freeway in northern Eagan. The original study area was divided east/west by Dodd Road, a minor arterial. In 1985 Mendota Heights Road terminated slightly east of Dodd Road. Since that time this roadway has been completed through to Delaware Avenue. Mendota Heights Road is identified as a thoroughfare on the City's Transportation Plan and functions as a collector distributor between Delaware Avenue and Highway 55 on the north side of I-494. The potential for increased traffic along this roadway as a result of developments in Eagan and Inver Grove Heights has been one of the main concerns for area residents. This issue, as well as other traffic related concerns, will be discussed in greater detail by Short, Elliot, Hendrickson in a memo included at the end of this report. JSoutheast Area Scoping Study 31 May 1991 Page 3 Mosf of the land within the Study Area was vacant, privately owned property in 1985 (see Figure 4). However, there were a handful of single-family homes generally grouped together in several locations within the area. Independent School District 197 owned approximately 80 acres that they were holding in the eyent they would need to construct an additional elementary school or junior high school. The site was big enough for two schools. _ ; . . - - : - The current land use and ownership patterns surrounding the Reduced Study Area are illustrated on Figures 5 and 6. Nothing outside the boundaries of the original study area has changed signi�icantly. However, much of the land within the original study area has either been developed or is in the process of being developed. In Figure 5 we can see that the area east of Friendly Hills is now pr�dominantly occupied by the single-family developments of Copperiield and Hampshire Estates. This development is consistent with the land use anticipated for this area in the amended Land Use Guide Plan (see Figure 7). These developments are characterized by large, relatively expensive single-family homes �� interspersed among several small ponds and wetlands. These developments also resulted in the establishment of two neighborhood parks. One provides active recreation facilities and the other is primarily intended for passive open space and trails. Representatives of this area have been among the principal parties expressing concern regarding the potential for the remaining developable property south of Mendota� Heights Road. One issue related to these developments is the need to consider the relationship between the single-family residences on the north side of Mendota Heights Road and the potential development of the property on the south side of the road, particularly in the area on the east side of Huber Drive. Another single-family residential development is currently under construction in the area immediately east of Dodd Road and north of Mendota Heights Road. Bridgeview Shores, as the development is known, will occupy roughly the eastern two-thirds of the properry originally owned by Independent School District 197. Lois Rockney, Director of Business Affairs for the School District, indicated that the district recently completed a needs analysis that showed a slight increase in enrollment. As a result, the district intends to . continue to hold their remaining property in the Southeast Area. However, Ms. Rockney also indicated that there is room on the grounds of other School District properties within the City to accommodate an additional elementary or junior high school, should one be needed in the future. - In addition to the single-family development discussed above, there has also been multi-family development activity within the Southeast Area. The first phase of the Kensington development is under construction and includes 136 manor homes. This development occupies approximately 22 acres and is located midway between Dodd Road and Delaware Avenue on the south side of Mendota Heights Road. This development consists of two-story, four and eight plex structures with shared entries and attached garages. Future development within the Reduced Study Area will be adjacent to this development. Kensington Phase I is consistent with the land use contemplated "for this area in the amended Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan (Figure 7). . ' Generally land use within and surrounding the boundaries of the original Southeast Area Study is consistent with the intent and findings of the study and the subsequently adopted ; amendment to the Land Use �Guide Plan. In other words, what has been built is what was ' planned for. There are basically two exceptions to this rule. They are, the remaining .. ... ... „ ... ..._ . ...._ - - .. _ .,. _ ._ �� -�-- ............... .. ..... � . ._ .� _._ ...._..._.. - . . - __.. . _.._. ;:x-- - _ ..... .:_�:.:_.._.._:._:...__._._...:..',::-_ ..._:...._::-.��, - - .._._.._.._.._...... . _..._.. ._... ... ::......�.... : �....., ::�:. :�� f t --_.�.._.. � ......"_.......... _ _ '-.? i_... ..:a � ...... :.. ......:_J C,...: �7::. �... � «' _.�,» „�, '_... ,........,...... . ........ � � � „r-.�� ' �"" . : � ::.:.:......."" . .... ' ::. :» ,...... Q ..�.�...�r- ' � -....._..� ».__� �_ .. _.�. a1 , .... _........_........._.......... ,.""�� /�..:--��-----� ...... � i i ~'r � '' �► / � ( i '� , ; 't i ' �, : ' �—: /�/c.�_. ...�,.. ...l� `` , .'. 1 �4. (l � � ' `� ' ' ' �a�NTRY �Lu� � 1 � � M��yD�TA► HEtGHYS .. �.�� ($ � �' �'� � SE AREA S+CC3PIi�G STUDY �� ',�� _ . , , I MAY 1991 t�:..�i • � l..-� � r„S �a _ _. ' . _1 ._: � : :.:� :: _-- , - i � .� � ' � . • � �E f _....._._..�� ' . , . �" . � , ` i- � 4' 1 � •,. ., • ;�� ; � °,� � Reduced ;,� � .�_�., : . ; � � Study Area .� . - , �� i � w� .€ • ;r . � � � - v� � \ ! Nortn _ � �.1.... ; i � � Y i � � •. � � � � i Ri' ; r; - ' •� i � j {�� _" : � a r 1 . i '� � : �. M+tn v � / JM f �^�'^ � � � ..l. �f. M00.t kN t ...PC1Wt�—CO .� [ASlIiEMi ^. � . p. • •�' t��li . e a. � � _ • i ' i �''''�'�'`�'`''` .wv.�.. � •:«�•• ,,, .ti! *�j ' �' �� N(�.Y MARSN � + y • ♦ E� �� « � � ` • �•`[�w ��4y � .2 i • �� ' • • . � ... . �+ , „^-.-= t � '. .�l ». m �^.1 � . � .. ......_. . `y , � ...._..� . . •�1 yY -�.�t Pa#tK ' . .. • G�fi � ` �..• 1 '� .,r • � : . . *�'--.�-- ;: a _ � _.I.... .1. . ..... � . - -... ' r . r , , .....,. : , _ � � � � � L ._ �.,�_..�...._.� ; r" • �` • ,�� , . � _ ♦ .'. € . �' � \ �= �w J • I ' `� �/ s • � �-• -^ � ' . .. \ �`' F , • • t • " . x t', __ ` _, . • '/ . ` %� .� �"'""_.`.'L �y"' .'� �, a� . ' s + ` ` ` � : . '"!� ��'� 1.� � � .... . #.�`- ' y � �. _�. - `' w y,......y ;... � .w. �. ., ....._ �-__ IL _ . .; ,,�• � ' { ,. - , � J .. , � . f ��.y � . .S f- � � • ' �•� ` � • . J1 �.....� ..•r. �. *� C , 1 • •�� w � . • . � — {�...�.r� ....'�4�. / tt f � � �. •.s•"�/� �i�' � � ��i�+�,• <.. �"`'.+!. �� 1^�- •i�t � f q ; •' . • : . • • . s • r � , - • . ....�y, • r� _ '� y _.,�� I - ^^'""� ' • • . a+ , 'u � , � i�� 4 _ F • • • �. .♦� _ • � . • 1 r � • • ! iti. • y � . y _ � . _ � .- •-. . • r:) � � � . , , � . , .�. .�,� . �+..:.... __ .. ...._� . _�� _ - . E • � �=� �" � • ��"" � . . � .' . . , ! , : �: `. � . � , �.; • •�:�� .. ; -: Q .�• . , �-., -�r K,. �_ o ��.�--,�� .� • '��` . ' � . �r+-..s...�»� . _ . / , . . ....� ' � ..y �.�1 „ • \• o,i,��. �' ` • lr . _ ¢ � �. •' � ,/,^.. e�°-.��.,. '- \ • ``�..r . " • i �j''' _ ,, j F • � .. (.J r- ; ti. , n•.. n�:.� _, f �' • { �•Sj {{� � t• f t i • � • � • �"� • • y �� t ': �� fi 'rll � �� . �Y "-�„ • � ��,, --•{' }E^+-}j-.�j{.,,�-Jf f �`«�=it •�� .��-+-.^^�'�`` � � : - �...�s !.J 4 (,.•q: ii� � • t y . t , . '` � ! £ s,� f _ -e-�yY.L1..l�l•..I.! �t 1!' ~l� . • '� ` • ' .. �� , •_�,("' • ' ^ . �r . � � i �i.: i j%' ~' � �� ~i r.. �! .:� • 1 • �• /�., � � J � + i ; _ '...� j � `� t G t i�f �i� �.J�� - ._ ' � . � � . ... .. . .. + . M � i�.�� i .t• 'i� ,/�;�� ;=-�,��,�1; . ``� �J�. , . ....'.... v � _ . . � � l • --- � � • • ti, . . . �;,i 11 '�`�,. . ` . ' i�-�� , , • . . : . _ . �::_... . • _ . r • �- . � • • • �- . r C • % ` � _, , _ . • --• - • . � • , . . . � I.... � *'�{`, . � ••. • •` •�" �" !1�� o.`"�.' • � '� ��\�`* � � •st �•�, ��jj�\ i .. ....: ,,. � � 1 . t, a .. Y � � ``�. • ``�I"1 � J . \. [ / ` � � ` -� i ;.. i �}oa �} ` ;}�f t� � � V • � �:� 1 / • �� 4 . ffi� 1 i~`/ ti - • � `�" "' �. «.�...� • , • � ^"'"`�+ �..J �'r�s � :� ,� �.,a. � r;. �j+l ' � ! , •'• • � ' E . s. � • j a 4 . • , - � � �F'4 '1. 1 • ' i � � s : t ' ♦ . • i•' f o g � � i • � APAkkiF...�f.,-- ;./� � � � I 1 • i.. . ' .. � . t • . . r . •._ • i . � � .='�;�., / ��'�," , �� ' � T' / • .: 1 f ..� ' _._ _...,yi..1..� � � _��j .. 1 . _....._ � � ....«. . _ i31 Y . , ....�..e� ; . f f �_ 1 _: ' . .. J i ' ��, pM / � ` ( i �` � • _� 't •+3 : t : . . •� �` � j 1��.,..i AB41/I}47N�0 �� e�. ' . .,...�.��...... � ;, � . . � + .. � ��X•-{n��t--t-��-�--c-��r111 /�-� wEll • t � J ': �J • R 40� ' • � • � ! �./{'� 1 � +![ J � � 1� '� : 'J' �4 i a � • • � iiAGSTR4M•ICINf. . �....- ��. � {..� Q j � � ' . ..-�'� Z w .: �...../� ji. �*� t � � . r � CAR��-+.. � . '. , • . ' ; . : i ' �.... 4 ;�:r / ,. �; < , ; _ -�.._ _.._....._ �._. `',�� `:�.::� -_`�=�: 1,� --� � _ • � ,, ... .. _. r " ,.a �,, _ . , c �`�' �'- �; s —�i �.,_,,,,_, . � . �f : yf..' �\� , " ��/�` y8 �'i_.. 'i� ` � ROnD �......_.....__....._.__ �- ' : {t ft"'�.�� Y �\ \ xK � � �,f '��4 £ � �1 t Y� . h� � ! �p� ,..--- � y ti � � :...� • , � , +°• �o � � . . _ 1 ` .. � ; � : t�` r � .Q;' ' q } ` _ � �,t�. '• (,�,� • "a `�, - z _'r _ 1� 1) . � ; - =� � i :.t+: _ ...Me�do�a 'm� Fl.�ignts ._, �t.� � � 11 'j • �O� 1� c8 r � : _ ) • i..». �• � al. t' 1 � J •' � ; ,; j r.. � � . , � �`� �• , h�I.. �j " d �► q r � f tl� �i I / vTa ��r�o' .. ~ f ty r t�`- � ��:.:: - �__`., ; ;�i„� r , r ; /''�`l . z ' "\ 3 �!�^+ \. �y , WAy...:^ � i ,,('��,}� ��',�, .. • f ..:...::::.. . ... ::l. , �.4 i I ' J,I!� ,�1�RQ. '��`\\.!IN .�. . . j �' ' ~ �` • ...._._ t h� ' � . i �',: ' . !: : '� � \ �. � j ......._y ! y t� . � t�f, :i �:`,,.'�`i :1�1'tt� 1 �•� .. • if. ' I� � � :; "4 :, '':°;;` i , �o\;,. ' ` `4'''�.. ' "'^ �, • . ..��.� : � u. i �.._......._............_.� . ! . ��__�}�. f e^�,�� , � t J �••�i't 1 �,.� 4 � r� -� � ..M. -� t�. ..... ... :_ ............._ .... ::......._........._..�._.."``s-�-� __.. .. _._....._.... '� .:. _. `FfG'Fi`�PAY" ,_„_,�:�;;�.....:,, . .._ �..�"_ ,,.� ,:- `" � ' � '�` � ......_.._. ,� _ ..........� ...............� _w .-:::.�,_.__��,:,._— --.-�.�._.. - -�-�..��"�"---�,._.'�-.,,,�. ' �nk �. { � � �~�1 . .__ ...... -' �c"�� _ _ _ `� "`�_ 'a.-� _ fi% . .' ' �---.._.�,�-.c�-^-.-^•':•.. ""�CUiE,,;_,` "i".ETiYTA�_"R�I ='_. ��-� �_ .+.�_� -"""�"'-- Y. �.._ .�`w�:�i : ==' _'�""`" .'a-._ ' _' {�� • ;t. l, : .�!,:% - .. •�.� , . - ' • � . . � -. • . . �'^``�'-+�.� �T — �i '•�1, T { � , ,�. i •{ . . - , '.\", . �. �--.. � f _ / :�f'" , • . . . . � . ; ' . ' . . . • ' 1. . . . _ ' . : \:...�' . . . . . • ', ' : . �, � ... .....:�� „f' . � �v '� � ` f, ' _ - Figure �� . �� b � T � _ _. • � iY11_ �-' _- _ =�.� _ _- __ _ _ _ _.__ , " ��_'__ �-� - _ - �� _�� _ -�/ / / � _ ', I 1 O I — �� ' _ _ --� O o �{%' � �• '� ;. � � . , .g T`� _ • i �/ �i � i � J � ? r,; ' .� _ � � � MENDANOTA �aF ��SE d CWNTRY «�a I' MENDOTA HEIGHTS (PRIVATE) I ' 1 h � • `�. '_ I �� _ � . II � . , - .,+ , �. � � SE AREA SCOPING STUDY \ , � ' � p ' : MAY 1991 ' �` ' - � -� �`'� ''- 1985 SURROUNDING • .. ______ � �' _ II / t` - �-L'si �� G- ! � ■ � . - � �. �;, �• i LAND USE �' \ `,(" ' , � _, � � � _ = � I I • � • � I •� Nor:n \. �• / �-n`- ' � _ 1 Q _ --- __ ___ .t � 0� C,. ,:. � � _ /, �_�_ , � ;-{1I w - _'. 1)ftURR��C1�lON \ �_ _ f � _ _ _ _ ••• 1 I �C� - - . / p - - � :•' � • i ' -e c,`�' �� 1 ., l �D -==- ' �� 1 . _ . i' ' • � � . . 1 ' " ' .. � .. ... ..� �. i -•. ... _- _ ._:a-�• ,L` � -• � ��r _ - � � � ' , . � _ �..� � _ , ' - . . _ __ R, � .} ::.�: • �•''f•'' .j '. ..�: :... M Y Y�MN 1 .•,�;v j�:: •� 'i�' 1 _ ( /,, e' _ _ ' � � \ '>.; :FL',•:?'. ' i:''r�>:;:;�;:•,••:: '•�: � ' ' � \� / ' ' _ —_ , \ ►�rtN S•:�:+�':h:f..!<A•: . ..�%:�: • .::0�' f • I • _ _ � � �'�'�i'%:: f� �':'' : x. �,pi�` �. �( � ` � f . : .:',�T,•:iti�'•::'V•F'�''::;'•• • ..: 1. l I /% �f- � • � � •:i'�::'d ti�. � 5,:�. � \:t..� �''\... ' C E r ET C M r � \ 1 'I • • S� S {:{ i+'.r'::;.'.:: •.Z ...X ��?�t,?# ::? {':j �"-,.r?.::: ,y.. � � . . _.r ��• }{;i::}�:;}: .{i::,'i''•�.ixl�.i� "'.i,t•;�.::v�'�.'''v:� \ - - - _w�aoq--wrrt[�- _ " - - \ v" ..7�.[:•` C {:;'•7�?J'l.{•.�.••:�L. •.:. : � •>,:.� �,}.;f¢'�i'i:%': T �, _ -- = f _ _ .t. "1�,,� -- ,� •?, '�•:'•:.•:{:;•:y�c;�'°�::•:•::�?:,;`:�•.:•;r.:;•r;:;" �. r.':' ' a +r' • .r es} • . a • � {rt•q ST % -- �,�1 - - Tj ;:;:::�:.�::::.:. �:.:.A�::,�:::....:....;:::>::�A::::::.;;::... =.I�� >>�--� ...;:;.:::.��.;� -�.::..:�,;:-:.;�:��z�'��: ��;:t�� F i .. . �,. ., ry•.:... . , '� � h � . •.*.::''T ,.:••: •.,.�.� �:::.::;:>_:>..r•:••. �� ;�— - i�- � "1 _ �.3_ : • .�:`•;:4':'�:::::::::;f•;� :::;:.;. .. r 1;1. \ � � � lR! I , �„ 1 �%' . r. i } y `. yi.�K.'4��,F�''� � <.j � �j � � . L R[ I _ .J. .:C �:: -�8,'�-,'�'}�i i.• 2•'''..':'•!'• x 'S•}Sy1S• � � j ' �1 ' "" � _- = = - �-. • • •: �� :'�:;�;.:> •: ..;.'.`,''::-•. ` �. ��x>.;;::..• •••: �'• .' •:: ••.. �. ;, . , r�;;:: �. �.,�••: .;r. ��, � � �' - ••. • : .;:: <� •:: :•:: :•:.; :y.:a�•"•••: • � � � . •. v.v��>:::::..::•Y k•��;�T w - - � � � •• ,::�:::: �;k "'Fv �:::Y 1:i'• \ :•• V:,; � �-- JC C � -- -- - .,., - �, � ;:: �: ��-:::::� .�:�;�:-�:.: {„�,;:; . t 3 - - - ' �. _ ;;..� :;::: :::.:;�.::;:�:•> rq�y. r r _ � ' FI ='� _- -' _ - - _ �. •�. .�:t:' �`�'';-'`�•:<��y5':^ti::+>�:>:::.i;.f.;:,:;:::.>.k:Cc•. 'i � - - - _ � " •:k;.��::: ;�::•:::�:�: �: ;:::�:;;;iZ... .;�;.s�.. St;: :� GL � �� "_ - _- ,r..;.;; .r.......�.,,... .. . .::: : 1V�� .i:•:�:.::�.•..:n•:%;;::;.,:; ; :.�.��,i' u � � •>;:�x.; $�;::;:: ''•i;:':;�: E;�. �. y' � J � ! =1 _ ___ -- _ -- _ ' _ :ir...,�..;.:••::•.�•�•�'•:;:'.: :•�>•:•. :s `i — = S - -- � �. •'"��::'s:•''':',•.i�.% •:;�•o-:;5+i::�'•:;'!? - -- - — - -- - ..��L:;:.i'iii��;;:;�;r;'^.,y.:�>.•�• �;::;::•.;y::::�•;.:'.,..•.,'. � W '-_ — - � _= r — - •��. :��•:'•:::;�::;:<�•�:;;!::;::•'�k'` - ••:��. � + :� I i=- • _ � = 1 .r:..rl;T:ii?:y;`.i•`..�„Y � Y � _ - _ _ _ _ � J� `F � ,t, �?: 1.:it: )i:� •K''{�:•�'`•'..'.�;. . � �'iii'' �~ I . � � ' \• :1 �: t. -� � 1 $$f:�i�yf:�.:�:i.i{i:}Mi;;:j.k:�� 1-t �— _ -_ _ _ -_ � ' ' : Si:�i1� 7':: iF :y'. � .:. . �� ":j .:::: t 5:��:•>:•.�;�; �. � � � � �,`.Y:.u::i:<i.`:':' � �Y � . / � Iw . �= - _ -- -- - • .. : y. 1;�;,;,••^; :x,�: _ - �=- --J`�/ I ' Ie � _ _ - - ."' it t- ••�:�i�:i:�:��>�•i•'•:4'(�e;i�;::�; •::•::k.: •`>�;.°'3•�•:�M1``:•�.'`': � !W —'= — — _ _� ,� ; � `;a:>::;i;.>`•;'•;:;;�r'' ..�.*�.��....�q 4.c�y�'� �' _ _ li l.� ;-- _ �.- __ �,:_ ., � , , , .... ......:�.,�:::�:f�.�.:�::::,.::_..K,�.��. � " .:: . ; , � _ � _ — .!��—= / /�': ; r - �, �,�. ,;,, � ax, � , � � � - /�l�� i \ 1� i I 1 � 4 �y / � � // � � \ 1' � � � , ` � � �Jil � �l ��i �� ' S� t�, �' 1` i . � � /i .w \ � / �4 � -- -- / � � i �� --'16 � i` � ��I ; � 1 �. �� i �' ��'� ','�'''t'}::'c G� _ i Ir�° ' I ` � `. ``�/�: .._....._u ��.` � � .� �`-F: T .' I %4� �. . '•.'{1a:,;4:,? . �� 1' , � �� ' ```�� :. �/ � ._ .. .. '..• . ;A . . �f _� ��` • � �' :'1�I �� •' •' � �� 1 \.� _ .. � � W e � ca w .. -.. _ .. ....... -- — - — - -- - .... ...... _. , . ..._.r_�� _......... • __: �-..:,.��{N...� }... .. ._._ _....._ �._ - - -- ��.,—:_�_:_�:.—: 1 .. . .... ��- " T`� . ... i . .� w � """� .�s� .� .. . . . ' """" �� ................ � � � � ir ��i�..v . ,. ,. ..... .---- ...�,�:-..-,».>..... . . - ---- - �-----.. _... -„ .__.._........__. --5- .. � _ .. ._. .. . � ..� � •��---- �— .. : - _:: ...... ....._. .: -- --=---� r � ,- � -� - - - -_ _ _ — - _ --- ---�-- � , _ _ , . ._�� — -_�., _...,�. _ .. , � ; Q � � - ........... ....... ::::�=.._.:... . -� -::::=: �_:: �:� �::. . : . /- ; ��v ._ � � �� ; ; � . . �� ; � --�:r.......�;� , . . � -_--� .� � ° _ . �` . �-- � � `. � _� = .�,=�� -_�:�:_:::::::::�- � �-- • . 'i � j EhUAXOTA f/JLf C SE 9 f� .R. Cl.U9 / ~, �{ 1;� : _ � \\�Q, � i 1 ' '' �, i ��"' 'T� ••l• -. 7�C._-. �% I ` = M IPFIYATF.I� rII NT '�\` F r, ,,,�• M��QOTA NE��MTS ^ t••• 1 <\ �. ��i. N"';�'/�s��L. p l� (� � ,� .. t �: . :. •': � "�� i. ';'' � .�' . � : :'- �'� � : ;� .'t%b�; � 4, ��. € , � SE ARE SCOPlNG STUDY ` .. . ... ��.. .. ... . � , . :.. : . .. �i \ ° . . • �. p • . . ..:y - --- i; � �i :e� � ) � i ._,.e.a..> MAY 1391 f J .' .. . • .f. . i: ,� •• , � t '. e� . . .1. .t: ,j _ •� y ' ' • . , �' „� ' . . " �" :.v -�.) ' __" n . . : . � . � . t... ..._. . � :w �4ri+^�}�� + .�. . �: __��. � W, . ..: . . . ...... ._ . ... ............ ..�.:.. ._ . .. ....._.... .. _ . ; . �µ_ , , .. . _._., �=� . �" = _ 1 � . c � • ...� ..- -- ,�..... :_,._. ....._.::� n � .: . - - .. . .. _ ,,, ,�...� r• . ^ � _ • � �; �, ._--.:: f . � ...... , . . . , . ; . • : �c , ;� �v.. ',; �. � • : -,�..;.,�';�; %�,� '; �-�;;:' f , !�` 85 . , _,. . .. ..� . � j�- � �' � 19 �� ,\ � � , � y ;1;, ��- -_�, ' ..��...... , � � �� \ � �N . �, % r �. ..-- r.. �..,.. � .:,-! .,. ,_:�__:., � ,�, �: ,.� � , Ownership -:� �l �� . �`. • .:.f ; i,; �:__. : _ ! I� � : �; � � � - � _ C, �� { �!(: ,�.- _ , • , � � � . �°� �a f i� k � �� / I�=v�: �JI, �!;; �__°..� `� i:x. :�{'(�' ` \ ' tI- r+o�sn =.� gituaRf`t � o '�\ \-. i:— .::��-7;Il;.' _' \--.'- _ _ �b;. I -- . ..... �l s�► •"• - • ;. .; �` \.� , �. 1 ' ��:::� �-� : ,;+ � _ _ � 4 .�+...�� . • , _.._.. .�\ • ' •;. i : , � , ` . ., ! , ' -i' �` ,�i �4��'.�, !� \ ^�• ,!'' ' � :t-�\ \ � { � / • � � I l 1 � \ �y •� . _� . . . •, ...... _ . � • : , , � i � , � „ j �\ ;: \, � . .:, : ..,_ . _L._. ... a � ..li �cuu_._.�nsa.......xa...l.L _i � � _ ..... � . ._ _ ta � - . n_.._.r�-.........�.• . -• ;�"17i _ � /,'• . �� i • --',• : `�-`-L a .� • - -'�- - --r:- - -�';�}— - : , t _--r-r �y�". . � c=r-r_ � � _ -. .. .. . �,.... . ' i ;1 � " ' a. . : � ... F =•� � .. � � : � _ _ '�� i ; ' - wi � �� l. �:� . i : ' - . � ..... .. �� .�y Y M�RtN ; 7 \ �� J �� ' \ 1 . : �:: 1 , � . .. �.� ':a</ `. �� ` � .i f/ {E '�,. ij �ir� j ��--+ - �j _ :_ �,�� _.. - . .. _.�� `�(7yJ�` ., R-_.. f' ��RN � �, , Rpq��, r,'�F l �� •�1 \ _ GL E�f. �� `�`�\ . il I ��;`j'I Lr � ��_ `�� ' _�� .. � '"I .• ••\ I�• !(• /t `` � t F�' { �� ti M T R• { . � 4..1 � T7�'l':..... � � 1. fc \' t • •�.,Qrftrer�.son `1 �� 't�i' . ♦ ' !r � � .w�aon:� .riri�e�" � � • • _. . �� t •• � '. � i i . _ � � t� j�. � '\i �,,t, ; '�,_.� _..i �'�-::::�.._.� �, t t. • ��__��'.._. - I. 7 ;f- '�� .� �...r�-- ,� •� � i V ��: <. i � , +�- �� • .� . 1 �'. � � � "; �{„ l. � '�," /,�t ..i 1 . � � j _ y '! ,�� i�._..i! °r �( .�^` T-,...-� . .; f - ,:• � t : �-.-., ��_ '� . f �! a ,,tl,. _ .1 � lka� ^it f .�!-` ��l2"' -= '�7�• 1 . :':�.'� r. �r, j - : • .i �$' ,7--�r_i� �(�, � _� 1 ` -. .�.. .1, R_ RS .J • -' � „ , }. t.'� � 1 \ \ jf : � ,';ly% f • �:.::� � ' i i' n �usr � C ' - - .}. i ! ( ` �' ;y � - - � i ` �� ..tx`n �1 � i 4' • y _.( � �" t;y� �. >ax« � . . � � "-_ _ :� - ' �' � �^ , .. / 4 s. _ 1 `�� `��i l • / ,��Lj I '' I. � �-e-� ':-:'. ,�'�� •� .../�f� . :y�•• ... ,�1�6~ _ ;M�I'; � 'iO�i�.:i'U! w � ��, , .�.:.� i ` 1 „��. .:J � i• ......._�..'.. eSr-....�.......,r..�.. � • .�,�• � C J�: i i (� _ �:c: _ ... __ �� .. �• ! t. �� /i^�: _ � �� dpl,�, . �'', _ - •" I y� ; (lri i � . _ _ _ _ _ _ - '� _ _ /� I „M Jl� � � � -_ � � �ese " i Y�`iC'�`',i� �' �� 9 { �� . .•:,1. "j �L . !,�'�! ��.- _ __ _- • • •/L �' '_ • � f•". / C.. '� Ql�� '�LV �F - !f��: .� 7 �L, _ _ - _ •u i• Xv �,,.�'+ �. i �� • •� �r_� � ` 1�!`� �` \ �.; .il .i- �,� 7 . � xi � - '- S - _ :� . �' .� :r, � _.-�� '�_ � � ` • � � �; _. ._ � � �''- _.f _., _ ...� . j: r ..� �::-.. i �' i _ (— _ + �} . ! I. � �: •�� if. r------ "`- . -_ - � � .� • •' � J r.,��, ' �'" r ' J �� I ._�1 � i. i rl� n'1) : f,''s--�•: ^_.�.' �T_' .. �. •. , / �_ .�, � � �� •_ . C` '~ . ' \ . ,. '; . , �,l __ _ _�.y _.. _ - _ .:� . �.t� �, � � =� � '�� ,� � � ��'/�,��ae�ti�;�,�.;�� , � � �i '�, � f �`ti!f N'_...�.=-y_. - - - _ ..1.'. ..1 _ i ' i �t � .i. - -- f'� � `�� . C-` /j � � t;qn �i= . _ , r-_ - • • ! ;91 . �ir,nf�: T'.� .z� � � � e„- �� __�`,�F` - ; � _ J'- -_f r - - �•? � 'I• ;f�J t.s'�� .�_-.. m�e^ ��. — -_... ;''r!• �Ir ;1 = _ - _ - _ i�.. _` ��r�i `, 11 p �•, ' ..' � =.i :i `� : " � � • y •� �`; � :�`, . .. -� .'..-�_� : 1 i.�T� __.�: _��;��' tj � � —/y••r• �• , '' �-.�! r + � , ,. � ... �� `��, - . � � �V JI�1�� +c.'�i'�"=. - . . I irq i a � !• .J ! l--�_� i!'�: \ � � � � i � , ' J�' 0. d � � '� � 1 1 __ "" "r�r Y.. � �� C � • ! r t i % \.�. � f 1 � �w.acmKP � ♦ ` � � .r� /1 �.'`�. � 7 ' � � i, � ( �� :( i _ ..' � w«v. ~ � � 1 ! j� � �,. �„ . _^� � J Y ,��`!� ,j � t• ��.,•' ��1` �� "{ad�.....�(��'Y��'� i .. . " . ,_ �_ �1n �i 'i�• ' �...i ............._.....,� � 1� '_ � , � .o-o�� ' ` • � � „c,�.. � t � � ' � �� . � � � �...�, ` •. ._ _�r i��" � � r1 `!) i j `�, •:-�- :_� .; .._.�.�.��, � �{�� `'�� ;,- ':�" ',.,, '�" � .�..�..... q _ _�-__ • ��r�}' � ��`, , . ..,,' . _ _;_ � � • �� • i • I� ' �i � � �� '� � � •� � �8p fj�,_� �' _ i ; `YA• .y „ '� j;` -.�� r. ��'. n1��1� � �; � � �j�i r' 4!1 'i '�r�i'f'''yJd7�� `� :.a� �� % L `,i`t��•� ... / , / �� .'J .y �- • - +' _ -� 1 � ��Y � •� t � _-� � � \'�- �--.� , �.�, � 1 r `-�1/r� -`�` o` ,35, i i ._ � �r'�� y� �:`;i /� � _ � `�>� � r � ' , ,,.1� ^` ` �. � � .t � i�t�-�1r � � � i i � .`� \�-::%��'=--� / �t � �/! � 1. ��.� ��0 �^��7�_.�`� .i . `��.: ` �i ,; / �I �- �.� i ..: f� �� %i��♦ ' � 7 ' � � �� 1 i� �^- -'�,,, l,� !� i �% i ' �� I � � •+'^' ' ^!�. ��. . I � � � �` i . i i � i� �•� ' � t ,.,, � � � � '��_\\�. ..I L. __ -f � _ t�L� �•i �. ; `_.� �J � � �1 � � ' �1 ' i �_ �� ` -: :_��'_ _ WCI I � • - � • ' . . i .. ,^ . . � ., � f ... _ . . -'�- -_........__ � ..._. _ _ ...: - _ „w;......�i it . A° `'�- .:.- � _ . I •�• `j.�, \_ n - ' •; \ ~ .� ilf.1. �' ' � � • _ �,; � �, _ _ � , �, � ,, � _ ", � ^� , . << � �;. � � i . � � nci � i �' � \ � � '�i 1 i � � `i � � � t` �� ` � � l � � ^ t � ii ;t ii �� . � � � �`� � it � i Ilt� �i � � +�, � I � .mJ; � �`\.� �; f �/ � r �� ,�� q ii /� �` _ \ � ��•:: � fi�OU �la'arlt , , � \y t� _ -r � : � _' ., , 5,�. -, ,? � �� ♦ fit�,.j i �._..._.� ,� (f �i �� , �� . :, �� , � ; � , �,. ;; � , ' r �; -- � ,,: � , ' ; �' "_ _ --.,,: ,�.,; ,, � / � i �� i � �� `�` /''`� ��.j. IC ` , lM,_ _�_� i -_I� t��e i � = ^�� ``. ;. • : . � � / ��:!'S � � � ��SI i�•aF �� `� i� '��` _ ; . � � i � �{ �� j �Oi� .n�n t � \ . � i �� .•g �'J r 1{II ��` , \ i-� : J � � �^� � � `�� 1 � � / - � ---�---� .' _ . .. - _.."'•- — - -.-"-- -. .._ - .".'. - - —Z11'T.:E. ` ��-'�i� — ' r � , , t� _ � 1 ' ` ..� � i `� ; -� � =-�.,� .�--.�-�==-�.:—�-�--.: --�=��auen�iors� �__ __ _... - . .... ��_��•..'� _ � � ; _� - - � �, i„ _ �� . _-=� �- '—�+=�tl - - - � - - - - ,a�r��r -� � - - _ - � - - t. �. _ � � _ , T;I .. . . . � . . . . _: � � - ;..�=��:-.:�- ' ��;�: -_� �� . , T�l, 11; ): .-_'�'` , . . . �7lan u :A �._�,��. ,�� . � . . .. / . ,. . . . . ,�.� Gt� . . . . . . . . .:,�. .,... � �' �j ` __/ ., I� �. �. .. ` • �\\ I � .r--_.. � i `�;. I�� .. I. �� _ T (� C � �D 1] ,�� a � ; �� i. ;� �� ,l �' (PBIVATE) �� ` , � ' MENDOTA HEIGHTS � ' m- - - , a �: f: : f-.. � � � � � �, � , � '� f :� SE AREA SCOPING STUDY _ �� . I � ' -�m ` ' MAY 1991 ; � - :�-� I " � �` �. - °CURRENT CE+TE — � '�' � -� � '� '.,. � .�SURROUNDING � , /� , �. � _ _ _ .. ., - � r:-:; � � H,�, i L�4ND USE , No�� V i� ' � ' y ' " :1 . . ., ....... - J • :• r: � e J . t l' _ _ �� ~ �-- --1 1. • •1r _ � . 0 400 800 \ ��' �� , —��= - �. r� � 1 .�' •: - • � � . _ \ I �• I � ,�_� � • 1 v>Pw • •/ _ � � / � � '� /}�� / . � R E U R ��1 O N \: I� _ F "_' . ',' -� ,��''' ` ` 1 }��j i/ _�" '_' ;� J Q'G � � I � . . , i' �� \1 1 'j/� : �_.__. i ,� \.% � 1 -- ' ��.r �. 6 , .. � ._ _.. ... _ _' _� - '_ �i ` � = , �-? � �_--_ - _� i Z � r runn � • J,• T •. il • . i . . � -- 'ie `� .�1 '�• � � ro . � -' t9 � ►ARK \ . n�. •'` •� • �� - - � i ' � �� J�'y''� • � \ '� � •�• • � _ - CEY TCRY �� 1 � 1 . . - • •_� � � ' . � n \J ��1 __ - =wK.or1'_w+c[�- _ �•�-=F_ �• • I ••(••• \ • •`' ~r 7�� % \\ \ �_ � _ � �. .1 ��' • • � / `11'� � V° • (/ � � '� . .I. 'i, • if /� .1•1• . d..w.aawll � ��l O _'.�iJ I 1 ��j R]I . _ � _ ~• . � • •. ♦ _ ' . � � , v-jxc 1 / _ _ _—_ . •__-tl. ' ' _ ' _ � � I,; ��c r �� , ► � lqt i ' •(-R_ — _ /� � . •,� /- _ %'� • �Y //-•\ `J , �%� ��li � 1 � �_�_��_-r,�,' =� . ._�� -_ i�7-' _ .�.' � .: . •'`�;a�- • � 'p �j� �•�• �` _ ' ' i � J� � li/, 7 ; Y� , • r -- - -_ � - - - - �' ' �• • / ', •,' , ••.: � / a C� - \ 1- ,. � . ,. ''��, •�� _ _ ' � - . " - � . . • � � �� + �- `' i � 1_ __ �\\ I� :II �,.� �= _ _ -s 'S t'� _— tv :—r=�. '; °`• p' i,• � � � • I ' :1— �n c — • _ _'' .. _ I . r__ •.� . • ' � � � � . • . . • ��_i . !� _ _ _�0 ��-`�'�"- �_ •�� . � •. •._:, �a f ';,�t;�, 9 �� -� ::�� _�. ••. `�3 � ��• � CJ � �" `�. � . L JL, � r — - _ — • � • ` . �' \ � . .^. --J�' � / � � - - • �� ' ( • , ' - =---- II 11� � ,.=_-.- - _��- . ,, � ._� -' - ..� � �= - ____ _..h• �:� :��— �� -��[--�r—_= _ __ ' ___ �� e •W ` -.� . /' � . I `_-�- -n' .� .'-f� Fl. " C �� • • , � � � ' I� ^G •� V•/•�� _ ` ' �. I � j \'� �� - • �GSTNOr-aw . _ _ . . � „e,,,. �' � / I �°'�I� ✓ � K �.. \C' = '_ � '• sit• ' V��ii \. V�G. \ .�� - �� . /r� I � �i � e ` ,-, i ,�.i \ " �' ;�- �-� � . .� :. _ � � . ._ , � - _ � � s�'.�, � , � . . . .� , . � i� • . (� :;�;: �:;:`'�::�: ,_., \ � 1� �l ` : � '� ° � T ' , �/ �- - - � :.Q'•.••. � ' � \ Y - `!� .. ` � � C � Y� ;�'•"•?:. . � .� . I � .� \� ' . ... \ � ,I � • �. �, _ . �:;i::�. : - � , _ � __ � — . � ; `-' � i �j''� ;;`;':. . � /� —. � I �1 i V � . T � :� _ i �j t'�� ::�:�!'`_�::. ;.:::::�::�:�`�':>:��.:;:��?:�>;`;�:�';; �� . : v 1 � �; , , r ; ,. ; . p . � 'y — � — 'y . , l — __ I� •I.' v � � �� / ,�> / v• ' � . i �� . � - fi :� I \ �J , � �� •.:��.'' �.';�t�'`•rcr:�':>t':;`•':. - �• � � •• "•� i � — :;i ��:::;� �: �� :�i 3: �� '.:�i: � � �'? . / . \ 'I .�,;M:;:,c<w;;;r:.:;,;;:.. � / / i � /' \ \ - i � '�,'�>�':..:•. ..on,.y..a 6` / : _ � � �� .: :...... . .....:: ........: �,��I _ `` . � - _ _ � _ �' � _ . ' . ' ' `_ •`I . � -� .°r� r�� 1��V� �I. , ;�:.-" . .� - .. ;_ _ �, � , . . . . :._,. \`,` \\'�:, +I'� ; % ��-` � �/ �� ,. � �' � - ' .. T._ _ _�_.._� ` , ` I� .; �, -- _ : � . �'� , � ' "- �� /� \ i: j . \ii ^�� j,� 1 �—� � � \ '� � / �.11 �'tl �• 'J �'I � � L• _ — ' __ ,� � l/ � i I V \ �( _ -' _- N` ' • ,1 `" � � - .�_---=_�� -=--z _:: -- ' � � � _!� '_J l� � �—a�,..�� —__ - - � ( �—� ` _—� � � o' � ; � �, . � o x-- ♦ , . i I � � � ��J �1 r-; � .' ��''' . 9 COUNTRY CLUB � .� � �� ; � MENDOTA HEIGHTS . �.� �� ;� � � SE AREA SCOPING STUDY � ' I MAY 1991 �: � � �% ;>-- \�z ' _>__ . � - � ' _� cirr � .`'G � . ovcicE `� � ' • y' • � I '�� \ � . � � o � Current ! �M� �� '' ''•' ' ' i � Ownership � � _ ,� � .. .� - � � � ,� �� _ � � � North _ 1 � i � � } ••�'� •' i � i 0 4 00 ,« � •� ' i .: a � . � �wFM '• • ' . . �, ' • � � �� MOA1 R i ►OWER [O �� L13lYEMT _ p ___ _ . �- � . � � �_' • • 1 ._ � .: ' � �N Y MARSH t � • • • . � • \ • \ S. . �•1 • ' • I • . ! _ — � . — i �' • • • � �_:?li PARK ' .� A • � �� • . > y� � � i ' . . I • _ . .\ � ' • i,c • •' ' �._�_�_ � _ . . � , ', /• ' � ; ' . . •^ � ; `_ _ ', •/.�' _ �__.� '� � � � . ; 4� ' ' • \ �y-� � • • . _� - . • � .�. . . r .�. ' i' -' ' • �i � _ — . �' ' �, • � � � ' • �---� W �,3 �• • . ,� � '• • . • •�• • ' ��' / 4 r •I�I • . Q . • •' • • • • • � � • �� • f" _ • • r � � � • �• /� � � . . . � : �`� , �--� — _ ' - . ' • / -~ Gt' • J • � " � ` - � � . �• � � • � . • � • • • � • • � �• a . >_ � Q f �' `o` / � � �/ • •�. . '-' ' ! -� � . � . �. t a..: • . � i ;�-' ,n_ ! ' • � II ��. •-I -i/ � � � • � . � = a If ,/�P : a°�� i ;�� /'.,�. �5'�,�.. • . J � I-I•�•�'I� � . ��'L �/`' �'� ' P ' ` �z t �. , 1� '':�. •�. ., � ,- .-i " J �...-... ��K E � K• �\\�'ii�� .y��\� � � "' �• • , � ' • •�` , � • • +�r , V ,�• �i �' =t � ' • . I -- ��; �I(� .{. �� ' ;--T� / • ' .i Q � -�� \ -'/��'' /_---- -°- - �� 1 .• � �' . . '\ � �J`� � Q ; _ =—�. y � ��: . n, • /� � -�� , . , _ s • � �p , •,• a;,!,(�,� � . : .�, . - . � - ' < � ' -l-� •i I¢r• ___• � � • y I` '�ih a � � / !� � � ' _i • � . . .�,_ _ _— � _ _� • � . ....� • � • •` ' • � �f� I� �� • � W�\ � ..•�./� • � ' •, !,� � O . / � � I � � � _ � • b��{�� . � �.�, }� � m v • � • � . �� • � I �'� - �P ,�� '7 � � � � � � � � '• a � � • r '� �+ r' l, • ! ` • I • � 1. -t- • 1 . 4 � • . P 1.� ,� � � , I . • . I• • • • • . • �• 4 ~ . i I � • . . • � APA • a • , . - .� ._ . . ' • • 1 1 • ��. "�_ _ _1 ' -- �� •� �- -c' � � _ �� / _• � — � ' • ' _ !)i r� ' . � � � x , �-� ' � NDOnED . ' • • - �w e� w ' • � �.1u T w wEl� ' • r — � � � �� Scho'° •��istrict • • . , . , • . • 1 � �� E : � _��227w .�� .• • , � ��HAGSTitOM•KING � , . -- � • � '' ��.-._ • PARK , � __ - i : • � � • y � �.J . /�._ .- ��, . x . . . . � � _, .�O�A1' � � �;. • . 1 ,. I 1 ' J •♦ ��__ � �1(�� ' ,�\ ,2Ze w- _ R04D /��I� '_ 2 \ : ��O F _ _J; � Case . , 'Q' °��) � � , '` °�•c \.�,� ._- � - .. C ��__ _ r � �'\ . o _ _ . . ,�£, . m :�. - � � o =1 --�:�- ---- — -�- • } � -----�.';,(. �1 ;o `�. - _zs.¢*-= � • � � , _ . al� \,� ��? �, ��9� , Ri 9 — _. en .:�, �. .I Putnam Patrick w, �=o _ -� J � �� _ : _-�� /��;��C�ihtex�_. ; � `�F ��1 a �. Il � ��\ ` � ��p � � - p�\ H4-.aAV � �fr , \� � . I � ' \\1,\\ � J � \ N � � � � Elark W � ' � � ' � � — —. � l'w / ' � . /^� �._.dCenned • ,,, : ,_ - - � - _ �s ---. -- Kan'e .� ---�— —.- - — — _ • �,; � � , ; � � :,��: ----- �— - --_ —�-: -_ ----��,�---��r�—aa�c ---- --- _ _-- cn':. � �' �� . ��/ �'��r!'• .. . : . . . . . � • • .. .. •..`. . .�y � `�;r' �_ .!=',,�-� . ' ' .. .� .. � . . . • • , , . , . • .:�;��.. . . . . • . : . I �1 . � l�� Figu 6 � '�' � , _'� j '� ` �/ � (ARiYATE3 � ' EIGHTS � (� - ," � j i. � � �t � � � + � �,,' N[ENDOTA H ,� r- �,-- „ � „� .,� .� -� _ c� �' :• �� _ SE AREA SCOPING STUDY �.- � a,' 1 Y+: b� .� - � " MAY 1991 — � '"� : ,iP3 �'�' E 0 CEwTE \ �, � �v_.. _ ' �r. � -. 1989 � �' c� ' �- -�� I� � `'�` t"` �AND USE PLAN H��th y;= - (i � ��L- _ '�`'' � � � p ;/ — _ ' /, _ , ��!, � .t ,r�' �. : j� = � „ Sr` aaiS"""�oo �-` � � ; '� . ,� _ `� ,j-� � '_ .l+ 4 �._.• •t � • •!�. � `� i -�^�' 1 K __ �E' UR �ION � I 1�� f�j � _ '_ M } ypR* ' I� � •; _ \ J � �z j ` �., � r y_ `�1 -1 i ■' • t i � /� � •I . � ' l�! '_- .:y1`• „r� {' � • Y� � - ,.. ' 1 � • f • -- .'°::��. . " ' - � • . , ' • ^ ' .Y. s,..�. . . . • � aa . .. _ _L _ . .. .., ._. ... _ _ . -• "' ,,.�- { �+�� , _ - - � � � � � I ' �t° _ - • - — �•. ,�\ ►AFRMARSX ' 1, ,.� '4" �� ' � � � � �•�.'_ - t£1t�Tt11Y � �� ' rt '"_ � i _ -�t•- ...). ' t ' • 'I. .� �1�.' t \ YWMd1i-MMEE4� .��" _ �f,: ' •• \ '• '%. d �! � o' � � ; - - _:F _ _ ' �_ .•,I.,, ``�, , .• " `g ' •J�� ,,, • �-''��f r : �•�� - � «,...o.��i Q . Ka -a _- - - �� ' • ' J - '-� �� r , irq +I (i;� �' � i • 5.;�= __ �T ; .,�. -�� -=, �- r �j ��!'± � J) 1 �.';j J f' 71 %! _ = _ _ _ ' - �'~ - •i `� �vjj'' - ....�: �*- •� t � _ ( yp �i � �%�' r.. _ • . � � �. � '1 ' � =- —_ -:�:"-,-- ._ - •/f ��y '.�1. a�� !. �r• �t t , ,�� U � 1 =.� � � ..� � � ' . � C �~�_.J,� i � _ _ __ ' s ,,� •" �.T....�,fv--�) : ;�: :�• a' _ -....,� __ ',, � • �� : �r---^}F 1 t �� _ - _ �. •,5 si _ _ _ , �� •y"_—y„ � o ' • � L �.% i,• • • � : � � � _ ' _ "_ _ _ " " 4 1 � _ ' �� ,I � � ` �r1J ;�� __ _ � G!p � _ � ' j�• ,'' ': . � ' ; � `,,. l ` ��ln s/'dA - . !j. ,i Jl � r/ J� ` 1� '_._ _-,�. �--- --- "- � ' �'' � ; �I,:� -�C•• r,.�, ., ,ti� , � • ,�; �•3�. _. �.�t+„_L^�-' 1�.� �y( / r _ _ . � � � , � , � • � -- I _ _ ± _ _ � ;�.-,--�_ , .� . `'.- , 1 . � �_ -_— �'zr i '� �' � I � ��•• '* . —'--- .,,\ - ��:� -1-f„" i _�_ __ _ , � 1 = : . �„J .� _' , . . .,. - _ ti. � � '' , � �- �,�z. \ 4 � � '`"' ,,.';�.:'" .� �`''� c:`:`: °S Ool �1 ` - . e . , \� ...� � � � _' ....o`. K.�., � �"� �1 � '� i ■.. . .�h�GSTWu.KwG ' , � /" � � �--' # �,=, {� , �• J �� r.A. �,, � --I / , I � r 'I � I /-�i'�• �.s x.�` II.M ; "/ t_ : ,,. . � .< � � ,w � � i � ,-_ �� =-1-i ; - �^ i . '�� . `� : . 2.3 un�t' /a r -- ��'�--�� o ��t�• ,� �— ,�� '� : � :/ i � • , `�: :'i � `� � y ' �� f... C�� • r,9�-- �''�� •'� _ ' }'' { — Y[NOOT� M1GMT7 ROI.P �� - ' • — I �D • _..., /�� % ! .' �' " Q , j- � C� t 4 u�, s(acre - �, (�� .;:,'��. �.. � ` �i = _� ` - _ � lf� ��? � �of' a'��.,� � r �' � . , ' �.� �.. �' P U D��.�` s j� (� `\ i.� � i � �� - �. , . ' �t; w., i tsiacr � . �o,,.�..z � � . - - - ''•' �1 � � �^ � NFiERSiA7E -- _•_a�-- _ -�..� / \ . � : -��- �'. - - - _. _ -�_-- -_�==� _ -- --_ -- - ----- --- --- � --- ` � r-.�-= _ `� ��" �-- . � =`' _`'�� ' ��`IM�r �' .: _T. _ --f�,,,.., .�'� , , _._.�r� ' — �_� .. _ . - � - -acu,,err-Roat . - . •-- �'-•.' - �._ �r i ,� j - � — -,.. � . :�: �. . =--�' �'�. �. � � . • . � ` ••• . " �%'r . M ... . � - . . . '.a _ t. \ � �' .. !.� , .. . i t �. i ,f:' :\J .,'`�' � \` � I� �' �. ' ,f. —.�.G �� ';_ � � � __ _. J � \ � i i� / v .'J ` ' 11,11 a t � � � _ , `� C = --� � � ,%, �� - � � r� . \ 'e � \ '— -= I ` i y / ��'?/h i:t` � E -- =-r� �i,� Ci q �!'� � - -_ . � 4 ' � \ . ;' � ,� K � . . t • ^' .._..._.:.-r^ �• ' • , �\ - _ . , \ C�� :Y - ._.._.._.._."'_"' • . .. - _ _ ...... ._ p . • � - t.. � �.�.�.�� '� ..... .....�;.� : � �. � - .i. 1� 1 � _. . �_�_-�.�-- ''� - -. _�� .;��•a._:�;..._...�..'- _�::::..}�t.�.<_:.�.�.:. ��, �� „ r :r , „- • .. .. . . , , __ . ..� , . .._ . . . _.... . ....... __. . . . ..:.--_ • Y./ `t. . . � 1� a"' ' � • C� : 1 ' •�.�...:�: � - . .... ........ ��;-:�:. . . � / . .� - =.y� ' . :� - 1 �!/ �_ � _ �. —'-3:T:' .T.ti"# Y'7[ �it0 �.. __ � ' 1�. � •• �..�... . ...... ._........ . ... ... .......�� _ ... . . . .. .. . i .�.... � .............. ...... ...... .. ... �. ... .. .. ..... . . . •••i^wsYwaFS �SS�f4Y• ...�.._.) ..:r �.� ....... �.t:�.:. ..�L � ...... ..... . . ......... . .�_:.. � � � - � .%% . �_.._ .. . ,; ...,i,- � � .-. ., _ ....... ..... ....__.. .. _.:.. •.:��,.,, .-.. -"-•-• 'L�_':_:.; � �.Il-__ _....•- , ..�. _. .... .:: .. --- � ,.. , ,._,..k:�`�-_��:: ��.•-�: . � •� - •- _ - � . � E�ISTING PARKS � POTENTIAL PARK ACQUISITION �''�:��:�= PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 0 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE � PUBLIC SCHOOLS � PRIVATE SCHOOLS �� MAJOR ROADWAY CORRIDORS � STATE & COUNTY PARKS ••� PARKS ADDED SINCE 1g851L �,] OMIT _ �J z��. � ' � -� j .--�� .•:�•%`:��.;'�'��•, i �� ,�� i . � � �.�� • . . I j �—� •J a- , F. � _: '�� ''. � 1' � � � � - �: r_ �`.�' ,-1• • �� ,�':••_r . ..:. '` �� '� �� '•. • •,' .f ; -- � % �- } � - . . i.� ;r �;' �`�' �: ! 1. � j " .:�.• ; �.�:. - : . � ,. ,�. �t::� ��.= �� ; t; _ .!i%' i� ,y •� ' % � � �. ■e '� �. � � '� ,_• ,• 1 � ' � . �, � i �, rF. ...4 "�' i I� . �i ��`, •. • . �� ... .. � •... * �e. � !``! � � � `� _ __ : r .• . •�' • � -' . � � `�" `�:; �`"r,� i. � r, # F=1 _) 1 � "t�� -: -• - �;� -•—/ --- --.t �� . � * . _ _ : __ ._a. _ � _ . � -. .. �,. � �' / . • — . . ... ,. r. . . . . . _ •— - - � � .'' ',� . , � , ` :�!' _ =� , �, �... .— � f:�=—= __-� . -_ :i —��.w�� ..:' `� ; `�" :;: :' - ��-, . .::::::: �' ��__' ��`�<�� . �-�e�d�k� � �,::.:..� ' � .• �. -,� __ �� _ S. ��^s•� �''� 2 L •• _� E� .-- � ��Coppe, �•�'reld F ; i ; ' _1-_� �w{4� : • i '� ' 1•'• � � _ I . . ...;.;.:. � gstrom King ._ _ -^, ,.. -- �---! .j� t ' ' ' .'z�' T� , � _ �j . . � r`/ • �.�y � . . ' ` f- �� . ,f� PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY NEEDS STUDY EXISTING FAClLITIES CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN. I-LJ—L�^ iOURCE: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. � � �« � Figure 9 . ACTIVE PARKS Civic Center Coppertield 1 Coppertield 2 Friendly Hills Friendly Marsh Friendly Tot Hagstrom-King Park Ivy Park Marie Park Mendakota Rogers Lake Sibley/City Park Valley Park Valley View Heights Victoria Highlands Wentworth Park City Open Table 1 City of Mendota Heights SE Area Scoping Study Park Acreage ACR 11.0 24.4 5.0 16.5 33.8 0.6 9.4 9.0 5.6 19.7 37.4 11.2 86.7 0.4 5.6 10.4 8.8 � OPEN SPACE Hwy 13 (Ivy Falls) Marie & Lexington Caren Road ... ...... .... ... ... NON—MUNICIPAL RECREATION Dodge Nature Center Fort Snelling State Park Lilydale Regional Park .....::.::�.... �.:� .::;. .,. TOTAL. � f ACRES 4.0 3.2 1.6 ACRES 158.2 611.0 343.0 ��rx� City of Mendota Heights SE Area Scoping Study Mendota Heights Park Facility Inventory Multi-Use Football Facility Tennis Hard Play Softball Baseball Soccer Hocke Free Skating Picnic Volleyball Surtace Apparatus Youth Adult Youth Mid Full Sand Grass CITY OWNED PARKS Civic Center Park 1 Friendly Hills Park 2 ......'1 ::.............: 1 1 ;:;y{p�),:; 1 1 1 ;....'1....... 'Ha strOrri-Kin°:` P.ark ... .:. .... ..... ;...:: �'1;::::.::.. .::: , �> .. .. ... ... .�:......:: >:......�X:..... ... ..... . ;: . _ ... .:...... ......: .....: :.... ...... .... . . . . ,;.. ....:..,....., Ivy Hills Park 2 :...::.......1...:..... ...: 1 1 1(A) 1 1 ;;.....:'i:... .; Marie Park 2 .....: �!..........� 1 1 1 1 '.:'�."t:....... : ,.... , ...:<..; .: . . .:.:..:.: ......::....:..::.:: ....:.: :.. .::,:.:.... .:: .,:: :.:,.::.:,:,.: :....:. . .. . ..... .::. .:...:...:.. :....:.:.:::::..:: . ::: ..:.: :.: .... . . Mendakota:Park;. ....:..............:...:..:.:.; :..:..:...�:......._;:�..:.......�::._........�:.:..:.....:`::::.....'�.....` >:..:.:.��;:::; <...:..`�;......> :.:ii:.:...:: Rogers Lake Park 2 .°:.:�:.... .....; 1 1 '.....::�:......: .... , .. : .: ..:: . . ...: . ... .:. .:: .::.::.: . . ::.. :: .:,,. .::..:.. .... . .. ... Sibfey. Pa�k:::::` ........:::...............:.............�...:: 0 ; . :::.;2.. .: ::. ..:..._i:..::... .:: ::.. .:�::..' Valley Park 2 :.....;1 :..... .........: 1 1 1 , :..: .:.....::.. :.:...:.:.:. .. ..:.....::.: ._.... ... ...::..:::: ..:..:::: ... Valley.V,iew tieights;Park :..............: :.::.....::1!, :....:.: .:.. .:. ;...;. .::,,�;:.., . ::..... .:. .:::::::.:.:::. :.:.::::..:..:.:.:..�:.:::::::.:::::.::.:�.::...:..::::...::.: Victo;:r.�a::Highfands.P�rk ::......:....:...:: ......,....:�... . ::...: ::..... ....:1:.._:. .... :.:..:::):.:...; '........ ... .. Wentworth Park 2 .:.::::......:......::....: ;...:: ;..:.:..... �...: :...:..; 1 1 1(A) , 1 1 1 ...� _..._: TOTAL 1985 12 0 6 5 1 0 1 0 0 3 4 5 0 0 ADDED 1985-1991 0 9 4 2 6 1 2 2 0 0 0 3 1 5 TOTAL 1991 12 9 10 7 7_ 2 3 2 0 3 4 8 1 5 • ' ��—�� . - . .. 0�—�Q0�00� �� . . . � . 0�—��0�� . . . - 0--0�� 0� �� - ... . � � �—�0�� -00�� . - - .. ��00�� . .. �000000�� 0�0 Combination/Overlay Field (A) Facilities added since 1985. � SOURCE: Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. & City of Mendota Heights * From Table 6 Park and Recreation Facility Needs Study by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Table 3 � ` City af Mendata Neights ' SE Area Scoping Study MSP A'rrcraft Opera#ions 1985 & 199U . 19$5-1990 1985 i989 1990* �1a�hange Total C}perations 3�2,665 356,605 381,060 2.3�10 Tota) Qperations over 2os,osa tss,7n �s�,$ss* -�.a��o Eagan/Mendota Heights Total Average Daily �,02� s�7 �,0�4 22.5�1a Operations Depa�ture5 II L&R 92,130 109,125 98,559 7.0% Arrivals 29 L&R � 73,ss� 7s,ss2 ss,3ss• -� s,� ti�o * Operations over Eagan and Mendota Heights reduced du� to construction activity on runway 11 V29R during the summer of i 990. SOURGE: Metrapolitan Airpo�ts Commission Nlonthiy Operatians Summary Data. 900 800 �00 �n � Z .d � � 810 � vi 600 [x � 570 W � 550 W F, � v SOD A60 400 300 1943 1498 2440 2003 2�a8 2d10 2013 SOURCE: Report af the Minneapolis/St. Paul Internatianal Airport Adequacy Study Advisory Tastc Farce to the Metropaiitan Council: Part ti: Study Issues and Analysis. October 1988 Figure 10 Forecast of Annual Operations at MSP International -E%` QCi@ Standard Deviation 2018 • KE1� -- Current Eagan/Mendota Heights corridor. - • Proposed reduced Eagan/Mendota Heights �� corridor for simultaneous departures. -- Proposed headings for non-simultaneous departures. J >� MENDOTA H GHTS SE AREA SCOPING STl7DY MAY 1991 u u^ �.a � � ti,.a ao�. �„ � ' � � Table 4 City of Mendota Heights SE Area Scoping Study Noise Compatibility Noise Reduction Level in dBA Required to Meet Standards For Use at MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL AIRPORT IN NEW DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR DEVELOPMENT� (The Noise Reduction Level numbers specify for each type of land use the amount of interior sound level reduction necessary for the use to be compatible in the applicable Aircraft Noise Zone). � AIRCRAFT NOISE ZONE LAND USE TYPE 2 I II III IV RESIDENTIAL Single/multiplex with individual entrance. Multiplex/apartment with shared entrance 3 Mobile Home . EDUCATIONAL AND MEDICAL Schools, churches, hospital, nursing homes :ULTURAL, ENTERTAINMENT, RECREATIONAL OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, RETAIL INCO INCO INCO 25 INCO 35 30 25 INCO INCO INCO 25 INCO INCO INCO � 25 35 30 25 35 30 25 20 CNST SERVICES Transportation-passenger facilities 35 30 25 CNST Transient Lodging INCO 30 25 20 Other medical, health & educational services 35 30 25 CNST Other services 35 30 25 CNST INDUSTRIAL, COMMUNICATION, UTILITY 25 CNST CNST CNST AGRICULTURAL LAND, WATER AREA, RESOURCE EXTRACTION CNST CNST CNST CNST � As defined in the Metropolitan Council's Aviation Chapter of the Metropolitan Development Guide. 2 Applicable for off-airport use only. 3These uses do not permit "in the wall" air-conditioning units in Zones I, II, and III. INCO means inconsistent - CNST means consistent SOURCE: City of Mendota Heights, Ordinance for Aircraft Noise Attenuation \ - � - - ENGINEER51 qRCHITECT51 PLANNERS DATE: TO: FROM: 35351/ADNAISCENTERDRIVE, Sf. PAUL, MINNESOTA55110 MAY 2 0, 19 91 ____________.._ _.� REVISED: MAY 30,_ 19911 MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TIM MALLOY, DAHLGREN SHARDLOW & U�AN, INC. BOB BYERS, TRANSPORTATION ENGIIJEER SUBJECT: SOUTHEAST AREA SCOPING STUDY SUMMARY OF TRAFFIC ISSUES SEH FILE NUMBER 91272-32 INTRODUCTION MEMORANDUM 612 490-20Q0 At the request of the City and the Ci�ty's consulting planner, we've prepared this brief summary to address some of the traffic concerns which have been raised. At a detailed site level there have been questions regarding how many trips would be created by different types of residential development and what the impacts would be on the surrounding roadway system. There are also larger issues being studied outside the City which may af�ect the traffic patterns and operations �f roadways within Mendota Heights. The information in this memo is organized beginning with a discussion of the more detailed operational concerns, and then it mentions some of the County-wide or sub-regional issues which are under consideration. TRIP GENERATION A considerable amount of local and national information exists on the trip making characteristics of residential land uses. The most complete and authoritative reference on the subject is the manual Trip Generation, 5th Edition (1991), by the Institute of Transportation Engineerse Generally, it has been found that residential trip making per dwelling unit has remained a relatively stable phenomena over the last 20 years. This stability masks a few other changing trends such as an overall decrease in the density of persons per dwelling and an increase in the number of automobiles available for travel. - 1 - SHORT EWOTI' ST. PAUL, CNIPPEWA FALLS, HENDRICKSON INC. MINNESOlA WISCONSIN B The number of trips created (or generated) by residential land uses varies by the type and density of the dwelling units. , Low density single family dwellings have been found to generate the most trips per dwelling, while high density apartments generate fewer trips per dwelling. A comparison of some typical average trip rates per day for residential uses are summarized below. It was assumed that the reduced study area was � bounded on the north by Mendota Heights Road, on the south by I-494, on the west by the Kensington 1st Addition and Delaware Avenue to the east. This area comprises approximately 100 acres. The planned development densities from the Comprehensive Land Use Plan were used to estimate the approximate number of dwelling units for each residential type. LAND USE AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS FOR TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL USES AVE. DAILY PLANNED TOTAL TRIP RATE DENSITY TRIPS ---- ---------- ------- ----- Single Family Homes Townhouses / Condos 10.0 3 DU/AC 3,000 5.9 4 DU/AC 2,360 Condominium (High-rise) 4.2 8 DU/AC 3,360 There are not significant differences between the daily trips from the various uses. An actual development proposal could vary from these recommended densities, but we'd expect only minor changes in the overall trip estimates. As an example, the variation for single family detached homes has been found to be strongly related to the relative household income and the number of automobiles available to the household. Trip rates have been surveyed in the range from 9 to 12 trips per dwelling unit. � The impacts of adding these trips onto the roadway system is relatively slight since they are dispersed to many alternative directions. Residential uses can have larger impacts during the morning or evening rush hours since the trips are heavily outbound or inbound during these times of day. For a situation similar to the Southeast Area, the impact on the peak hour between the different types of residential uses is much less than between residential and other types of uses such as office or retail/commercial. - 2 - Generally, roadway design and operations evaluations concentrate on accommodating the peak hours. About 10 percent of the trips typically occur in the evening peak hour (say 300 trips) of which 70 percent are inbound to the development (210 trips) and 30 percent are outbound (90 trips). These levels of volumes can be adequately handled by the existing street design and traffic controls in place. ' CURRENT & FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES Exhibit I shows the current (1990) and future projected (2010) average daily traffic volumes for roadways in the vicinity of the Southeast Area Study. The future estimates are based on the Dakota County Transportation Study originally begun in 1987, and recently updated to 1990 land uses. Future land use development assumptions in the Dakota County Study are based on each individual community's interpretation of their Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Traffic volumes have been tracked for area roadways since 1980. Some major shifts in travel patterns have occurred due to the completion of I-494, I-35E and due to major county road upgrading. Regardless of these pattern shifts, volumes have been increasing within Dakota County at growth rates of two to three times the state average of 3.5 percent per year. Besides the interstate system, TH-55, and TH-149 have been growing at 6 to 10 percent per year. The Dakota County Study forecasts have been compared to the previous estimates made by Jack Anderson & Associates in 1985 as part of the Southeast Area Study prepared by Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban Inc.. The table below summarizes the comparison for some of the key locations in the Southeast Area. The Dakota County traffic forecasting model currently is set-up to report volumes for 1990, 1995 (for the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program) and Year 2010 (longer term designs). Estimates of Year 2000 volumes were made using the yearly growth rates between 1990 and 2010. - 3 - a � 4 COMPARISON OF DAKOTA COUNTY STUDY AND 1985 SOUTHEAST AREA STUDY YEAR 2000 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Mendota Heights Road E of I-35E W of Dodd Road E of Dodd Road W of Delaware Ave. Dodd Road (TH-149) N of Mendota Hts Rd N of I-494 S of I-494 1990 Counts 4,000 4,000 2,000 500 5,000 5,600 20,000 1985 Study 3,900 6,100 8,000 600 4,300 8,200 8,200 1990 ' • Dakota Co. ` 4,000 6,300 3,300 <__ 700 , 6,500 9,900 33,200 <__ Overall, the results between the two forecasts appear to be consistent. Both estimates include a component of background traffic growth from communities outside of Mendota Heights. The two areas of difference at Mendota Heights Road East of Dodd Road and Dodd Road South of I-494 can probably be attributed to different assumptions for trip directional distribution and development phasing. The Dakota County model estimates total ultimate development in the Southeast Area having approximately the same trip magnitude as the 1985 study, but assumes a higher orientation to Delaware Avenue. ROADWAY OPERATIONS The evaluation of roadway operations is based on a volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and a measure of the Level of Service (LOS) provided. The LOS of a roadway or intersection is graded on a score from A(Best) to F(Worst). For example, at LOS A, no congestion is experienced and traffic flows very smoothly. At a LOS E-F, significant congestion occurs and� traffic experiences numerous delays. At LOS E-F, a driver would probably have to wait for more than one signal cycle to get through an intersection. - 4 - ,, Due to cost constraints, roadways can not be designed to operate at LOS A during the whole day. Most major roadways in the Twin Cities metropolitan area typically operate at Levels of Service in the range of D to D-E during the evening rush hours. Operation at these levels is generally considered to be acceptable. ' The future projeated operations at some key intersections in the area are summarized below. The projections are for 20 years .hence (Year 2010) and they only include development assumptions based on each community's current Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The actual operations may be different as land develops. The following section denotes changes which might affect our assumptions. YEAR 2010 LEVELS OF SERVICE LOCATION ------------------------- Mendota Hts Rd / Dodd Rd Mendota Hts Rd / Delaware Ave I-494 / Dodd Rd (No. Ramps) I-494 / Dodd Rd (So. Ramps) LEVEL OF SERVICE -------------------- D C F F It has been recognized for some time that solutions are needed for the I-494 / Dodd Road (TH-149) area. A detailed discussion of this area and some of the other corridors in the Mendota Heights vicinity is presented below. SUMMARY OF OTHER STUDIES IN AREA I-494 / Dodd Road (TH-149) This area was originally identified in 1987 as a"hot spot" which would require future improvements. The traffic volumes have grown considerably as a consequence of nearby development and due to the existing roadway configuration which focuses TH-55 traffic through this interchange to access I-494 and I- 35E. ` Some transportation professionals believe that the extension of the Lafayette Freeway in Inver Grove Heights will eventually divert much of the traffic now observed on Dodd Road. Others feel that the established travel patterns and adjacent development will continue to contribute to traffic - 5 - � »� growth. Unfortunately, development in the Southeast Quadrant- of I-494 / TH-3 and other development in Inver Grove Heights, South St. Paul and Dakota County may make the point mute since congestion is anticipated there also. In recent years, a number of formal and informal proposals have been received for the properties south of I-494 along Dodd Road. Detailed traffic undertaken by Northwest Airlines and the City 1988-90 to examine mitigation strategies. implementing Travel Demand Management (TDM) wer TDM includes promoting transit, ridesharing an� work hours. development immediately studies were of Eagan in Ideas for � discussed. i staggering After the evaluation of TDM, it was still felt that major improvements would be needed in the roadway system to support the proposed development. Concepts for revised ramps, collector-distributor roads and additional interchange access were developed for I-494. Meetings were held with Mn/DOT, and the City of Eagan investigated the use of Tax Increment Financing to assist with funding the road improvements. The concepts are still under consideration. I-494 & I-35E Operations It has been recognized that traffic growth has been so rapid that certain movements of the I-494 / I-35E interchange are at or approaching capacity today. Mn/DOT is currently reviewing options for improving the northbound I-35E to eastbound I- 494 movement. The weaving section on I-494 just west of Dodd Road (between the Dodd on-ramp and I-35E off ramp) is experiencing congestion. The single lane westbound I-494 to southbound I-35E ramp is approaching capacity since it is a heavy movement which must merge with another heavy movement from eastbound I-494 to southbound I-35E. The traffic growth on I-494 is anticipated to increase due to overall County development and specific development within the adjacent communities such as Eagan and Inver Grove Heights. A number of traffic studies have been completed or are underway for the I-35E interchanges at Lone Oak Rd. (CSAH-26) , Yankee Doodle Rd. (CR-28) / Pilot Knob Rd. (CSAH-31), Diffley Rd. (CSAH-30) and Cliff Rd.(CSAH-32). . �. r Trunk Highway 55 There have been a number of different perspectives over the last few years as to the importance and function of TH-55. The Metropolitan Council removed the segment from TH-110 south to new TH-3 from the metropolitan highway system, thus lowering their priorities for improvement of this corridor. Dakota County has, felt that this will continue to be an important roadway and they have supported Mn/DOT's upgrading plans that support this concept. Other activities are occurring which may also affect the future of the TH-55 corridor. As an option for the improvement of the Twin Cities International Airport, the Metropolitan Airports Commission is considering relocating the main passenger terminal to the southeast guadrant of the Crosstown Highway (TH-62) and Cedar Avenue (TH-77). This could change travel patterns by focusing more on TH-55 since it may become the best approach to a relocated terminal. This shift may be further encouraged by the limited capacity for the optional approach to a relocated terminal by using I-494 to Cedar Avenue due to the proximity of the Mega Mall. The congestion at Dodd Road has continued interest regarding potential access between TH-55 and I-494. While this concept appears to be a difficult from an engineering standpoint, it may be possible to provide some limited links between Northbound TH-55 to Westbound I-494 and the reverse movement. Any potential abandonment of the SOO Line railroad would considerably improve the feasibility of this concept. � - 7 - CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO May 31, 1991 To: Mayor, City Council and City Admini��r From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As is�''"`� Subject: Cat Control Ordinance Constituent Request - Carryover from May 21 Agenda INTRODIICTION City Council received a memorandum from myself dated May 17, 1991 regarding the request of two constituents, Mr. Ralph Johnson and Mr. John Mulle�, that the City of Mendota Heights adopt a Cat Control Ordinance. The item was not heard as scheduled o�-�May 21, 1991 and was carried over to tonight's meeting. (Please see attached May 17, 1991 memo.) Since the last City Council meeting, Police Chief Dennis Delmont has provided a further discussion of Cat Ordinances that offers more insight and some practical alterriatives for City Council consideration. nzscvssiorr For a discussion of this issue please refer to Chief Delmont's May 31, 1991 memorandum and the original May 17, 1991 memo on Cat Control Ordinances. For your information, I have provided the Nuisance Ordinance, the Dog Control Ordinance and the Animal Control budget for 1991. , ALTERNATIVES The following alternatives should be considered: 1. Direct staff to write a specific ordinance which requires the City to control cats. This�would require extra personnel to respond to complaints of violations of the ordinance and a facility to board captured cats and euthanize unclaimed cats. The City would also bear the responsibility for the cost associated with that boarding and euthanasia. 2. Accept the fact that cats are beyond the simple controls of an ordinance and will ultimately do what they want, regardless of our laws. 3. Revise existing ordinances to. attempt to make owners responsible for their animals and allow the City better methods of identifying the owners of stray cats. Other revisions would allow homeowners to humanely protect their � G r � � ,� property from pests, ACTI�N REOIIIRED Cansider the in�ormatian provided on Cat Cantrol Ordinances and direct s�aff in the manner City Council feels appropriate. � m . , � , �', �_•,... - 9 a� MENDOTA IiEIGHTS POLICE DEPARTMENT Memorandum May 31, 1991 TO: Kevin Batchelder FROM: Dennis Delmont, Police Chief �f� SUBJECT: Cat Controversy This memo is in response to your request that I review and comment on the present discussions relating to a cat ordinance. . - •+ We receive from time to time, complaints from residents who are being bothered by domestic cats that roam their yards, kill wild birds and rabbits, urinate and defecate on their property and make disturbing noises during the nighttime hours. Some of those citizens are now petitioning the City Council for an ordinance that would eliminate this problem. . .� A law that cannot be enforced should not be passed. If a^cat ordinance^ is adopted that suggests that police officers can detect and capture cats at� large, it would, in fact, be unenforceable. It is extremely difficult for officers, or the animal warden, to capture stray dogs, and it would be virtually im�ossible for them to catch stray cats. Even if cats were caught, we would be unable to assess responsibility, as the overwhelming percentage of them bear no identifying collars or tags. As a result, a passage of a restrictive cat ordinance may well cause more frustration for a citizen who thinks that he or she can depend on the City to eliminate the problem by virtue of the law. Historically, cats have been viewed as independent, harmless animals. In fact, they can be considerable nuisances and are not well-suited for control or behavior techniques. They pretty much do what they want and that generally includes making noises, hunting and using window wells�and children's sandboxes as toilets. It is very understandable tha� property and homeowners would be upset and frustrated over this kind of activity. 1. Write a specific ordinance which requires the City to control cats. This would require extra personnel to respond to complaints of violations of the ordinance and a facility to board captured cats and euthanize unclaimed cats. ' The City would also bear the responsibility for the cost associated with that boarding and euthanasia. 2. Accept the fact that cats are beyond the s'mrle controls of an ordinance :�l' and will ultimately do what they want, regardless of our laws. 3. Revise existing ordinances to attempt to make owners responsible for their animals and allow the City better methods of identifying the owners of stray cats. Other revisions would allow homeowners to humanely protect their property from pests. � i � M�Y� \�� : � \ If Council feels the need to legislate cats, I would recommend that several revisions be made to existing ordinances, rather than drawing up an exclusive ^cat ordinance". These revisions would include the specific inclusion of stray cats in Sections 1.1 and 2.2 of Ordinance 901, the Nuisance Ordinance. The specific inclusion of cats in the appropriate sections of Ordinance 1301, which would include the requirements that all cats be licensed and further, require cats to display a current tag on a collar or harness. This would allow strat cats that are caught to be returned to their owners. I would•also recommend that the trapping ordinance be revised to allow a property owner to humanely trap a domestic ani.mal (cat or dog) and turn that animal over to the police depaxtment or animal warden. This provision would be applicable to animals that are creating nuisance or causing damage on the property of another. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �'�- ' May 17, 1 91 To: Mayor, City Council and City Admini r From. Subj ect : Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist�� Cat Control Ordinance Constituent Request INTRCIDIICTTON Councilmember B3esener has requested that staff investigate the passibility of Cat Contral Ordinances for the City af Mendota Heights. Iier request is in response to several aanstituents, Mr. Ralph Johnson and Mr. John Muller, who "have been contacting the City about adopting a Cat Control Ordinance. This memo will attempt to briefly autline the typical cat control ordinances that other municipalities have, the effectiveness and enforceability of such ordinances and the castjbenefits of such ordinances. DxscIIss�ort The League of Minnesata Cities� Infornaation Service has supplied staff with sama sample Cat Cantrol Ordinances. I have attached three that I believe to be among the better ardinances. Watertawn's ardinance is simple, yet camprehensive. Maplewood's treat� ca� problems by defining them as a nuisance and thus makes cat owners subject to the nuisance laws. Rasson�s cat ardinance applies the same rules dogs are subject �o and prohibits cats from running at large. ,• 1. 2, 3. 4. 5. 6, 7. 8. 9. 10. Most cat control ordinances include the following: Registration and licensing by the City. Tags and collars. Proof of annual raba.es vaccinations. Prohibitian of Gats running at large. Some alsa include descriptions of nuisance behav3.or, dangeraus cats and stray Cr""�1tS . Impoundment praaedures, penalti.es and reclaiming provisians. Unclaimed cats. Report of cat bites and quarantine proaedures. Destruction of cats. Designatian for Animal Control, Fines, penalties and vialations. Of our neighbaring cita.es, West St. Paul and Eagan have provisions preventing cats from running at large in their animal control ordinance, but do not Iicense cats. Inver Grave Tieights is considering a new animal con�rol ordinance, but has reported that r �` A _• it will not include cat control or licensure. South St. Paul has a Cat Control Ordinance that licenses cats and their budget includes an Animal Control Officer. The enforcement and effectiveness of cat control ordinances is debatable. Cat owners are reluctant to license their cats and most cities report that only a small percentage of cats become licensed and/or wear their tags. However, in nuisance situations there would be a law on the books for enforcement. Cost and Benefits The benefits of a cat control ordinance would be the enforceability of the ordinance in nuisance situations, dangerous �.�; cat situations and diseased animals. Licensure of cats would � provide some revenues to the City through fees, however, as mentioned above, a small percentage of cat owners actually register their animals and fee revenues would probably only cover the cost of purchasing a tag inventory and processing the paperwork:� A cat control ordinance would please those constituents who perceive cats as a nuisance and a threat to wildlife. The costs of a cat control ordinance would be the time consumed for police officers to respond to complaints and the kenneling of the cats. Because a small percentage of cats are actually licensed, identification of the cats is difficult and many cats that are kenneled may go unclaimed. In this case, the cost of euthanasia would have to be borne. Cats are difficult to catch, and if they are unidentifiable, it is difficult to prosecute the owners of nuisance cats. Oak Crest Kennels, who provide our dog kenneling and animal control, do not have facilities for, or expertise in, cat control. A cat control ordinance may upset cat owners who do not wish to pay a license fee or leash their cats. Some cat owners would be horrified about restraining their cats, other cat owners may feel that allowing a cat to run at large is extremely-irresponsible. ALTERNATIVES 1. Do nothing and direct staff to not pursue this issue further. 2. Direct staff to draft a proposed cat control ordinance. If this option is chosen the Council should provide staff with some direction regarding the level of sophistication they would desire to have in a cat control ordinance. 3. Direct staff to provide more information on costs, enforceability and the necessity of cat control. ACTION RE4IIIRED Consider the information provided on cat control and direct staff in the manner Council feels appropriate. - 1� INFORMATION SERVICE I ue of Minnesota Cities 1�.. Uni versi ty Ave E. St. Paul, MN 55101 � Watertown Ordinance � Oq01NANCE NO. 15s � � AM OROINANCE PRQH18lTING `� CA7'S FROM RUNNING AT �ARGE IN TNE CfTY OF WATERpyyN ' � rROV101NG FOii UCF.l1ElKQ fMP0UNG11El1T AND OISPpg/1� WATERTp�WNCOUNqL OF THE qTY OF TA ORpqINS: �VER ��y. MINNESO- Sectfon 1. RUNNING AT LAqGE pRp�ryg�T � :. ED. No cat stnN be Pemifttedto run at lar�pe wi- : Section 8. REflISTRAT14iV PROCEDURE. ;. th4� the city I�i�a of the pty of Watertown at '��PA��catlo� fa Noenae shaN be made to the : �^Y tkRe. whether or not auch cat be repletered Gerk. Upo� cprtplle�e wtth the Ncenaed �nd txrmbered. A cat shall De deemed � tho foreDofrip sectiona It sFte!! be�ttiekdu�a to be rurninfl at larpe unlesa b kePt under con- m° �Y qerk to enter ttfe name of the owne� is conf'ned to �� the cat or the cat a keePer of every cat so r�epbtered.licenaed owned or leased by the own- � numbered. topether with a deacxlptbn or er of the cat. My cat runnlnp a� lar� b hefeby auch cat. M e book kePt by the Gerk for. that # deemed a publb nutaarxe. J Sectlon 2. IMPOUNOIfV�. My cit fotmd nm. i a y� �ebsue t� � ��te�red�, �0 at larpe maY be pickecJ uP and i�nppunded �nsed end ��Y Po�ke officer, Gty off�Ia1 or empbyee ��0 the rWi ��. topether with a tap . �� oP� } dealDneeed M me qry ror i) Reo►atrar�an number m sucn cat. Pounded cats shall b�e ��. Irrt- b) The word "Watertown" and determFned M the City � a1n11 be h�oused u d ��aH be faate� q�e coNar about wch tad in a humane merxier. Upon �rnpoundh►G. the �� neck and wom by auch cat at aN tfinee. owner of the cat. H knowinp ahetl be �rxned(ate- Sectbn 7. REMOVAL. k ehaU be unlawful fa b notltied by tekDhone or personel c�tact or �Y Peraon to romove the � or tap irom �y, bY written notice to his laat ivwwn addreae. H ��ed or Lapyed as h�� the owner is unknown. a w�itten daaptP�n of �uuY k111. melm. �'�� or to the cat arW Wrw �d P�ece at auch cat. °��° °f �' �'°Y °^Y .�� n�� HaH. The nodce�shaf! advlae 8ecflon 8. DISEASEp ANiMAL AND O& she h� three u�krwwn owner that he or . STRUCTION EI�pF►CEMENT.,H a cat b dfe- reWlar bustneaa days to ddm the '�. Wdoua, �Oeroua. rabld or exPoeed to �� 0 �� hoir8 end the kn- �s. end carxwt be im�d efter rbeeq�e. '�+dmed bY Ib awner wkhki �M ths eat is not ^ ble .ffort or withqi} ierioua Aak to the persp� . be �dtapoaaa or io aliume, mmu,a�, '0"'� �r � ��o co wnpaund. euai car my em knmear- Sectlon 3. REDEMPTION OF IMPOUNOEO �� a�O merx�er. Np. . CATs. The owner of +m cat �po� p,,,. ,on �awrul�, �der or hte�fen w�m �, p�K. tivant to U�Is or�dkiance i►bY rodeam wch cat by, '�. �� ot the or- .�� a� ta atxh cat M a qurent • 3ectlon 8. VIOLATIONS, FIfV�g /�0 laeued for the cat. end PEfV/U.TY. havs ob- �Oae ar�id pce e� �vffo atiap nat !n0 aN the knpoundinp teea. caata. talr�d a a ap � thathare at�tueti c�.to the•IGhe ot trialc- �/QMFt �' eat �e rsquked �'m°�a4etrwtion Jho�Uceneetees.�d , • 3�l�bt�UPb� t4�lF��f of�SSA.OQ �n0 tees and tkteb's�iad tie Pdd ro the qty q�' � �� .� ; UPa► PeYment d�ch coete end chm0ea the ��ncs at�ep b� 1ieble to a1i� of 525.00 �'�5'�dtrebasethaCatYo"!he ownertheraOfl• for the fkat oHense. 550.00 ta tAs :k Sectton 4• UCBrSING REQUJRID. Eve'ry p�. . otfenae and 575.00 for the tNrd o} � ��son ownkip. keepfnp or herborinp a cat over the � t�0ethar with a S25 handilnp te� and the fine ;wlirtMta of� he� rtanths withfn th� ccxperate i and cost of a Ik�erroe H such cat b �ot Ncertaed. •�for+e the firat � of Watertown. at�l1. on a be- MY other oHst�se trY �nY Peraon aheN be �' a MrN ot eacf► and ' dkmed a mladem��. r�d ' numbered, aaid rep�le �Q�. �� :� 5300 or ��d � a f�h�i° oi no� ��G to be vaNd for e �� i� bY �prleonrt�t oi not rtaro then . • trom and after Patod of one (1) year :�tY (00) daYs. or both. -Year: provlded, however, ttat auch cat to b�e `: � �R� OF ORDINANCE NO. ticer�eed iha8 have come fnto aich pasons po�, .:avn b h�rebY rePealed. �' or water- '- e�Qe � tlx�e (31� ��ttte�}kst�eined the s S�ctlon 1 t. �FECTiVE DA7'E. Th(s p_ . .oi the then �.�t Year. the owner� of AprN � ka +h� be h fuN force and effect from end ..;the peraon lheroof or PaseaOs and PubHcatlon aa ��sald ca! to be�� to Ib Poeseesion atttM carraa :hw. �� bI' �,at suoh drn� q� � �� °d��ah'�aCn W , �kn 1. UCENSE F'�. EverY Petson who ehaPl appty tor a Neenee in accor�� wRh fee ofS 5.�0p fw eec�h �a �d f°°�urer a Subd�vb(on 2. PROpp OF RABlES VACpN�1- TFON REQUIRED. Ad apPUcetlona for Ncertskp a cat ee provkkd hereln ahall be arxompar�� dY a�tatement hnm a pcenaed yet� �t auch cat or cata hna or have recehrod tr�ahnertt : t� Pro"mttion of rabres wnrNr, the peat two Classification # � O Q �: Municipality j�j �`�Q,-.� J �; Date (�1o..��C� �3 `� Subject , .. . �,{• . . .. . , f COfT1C IRtO 8UCI1 . Oi MEfCh. �QB%. . - .. . � � . r �a.nea Nnv. att�►„d � �:°m° � 3� .. , = - . .,. + � �h arld e NCetroe shafl ..l�7TEST• �� - .. .t. - c_ � . . ' �' t�� onthefkatileyplApry t��- .srftedro�urer � - ,' '..:'.: ' . ' " ��f�.';� « yA�NA�TI � �fiObF dF ftAB1ES . � 2. 1887.�In the Carver N�y - .. • a . ~_ • ' :,- i , R �. INFORMATION SERVICE League of Minnesata 4gp Cedar Street St. Paul, MK 55101 � Ci ti es D � ;,v� _ �,- - -_ 3 . . .�. . QRt?lkANCENO.�dB ' -. "' 1 AkOROtNANCEREGULATINGCATS I INTHECiTYOFMAPLEWO i THE COUNCit OF TME C�TY 0 MAPLEW ..' t30ES HEREBY OROAIN AS FOLL � SecFion i. The Maplewood Muntctpa! Catfe Is hertby , i amendtd by 8dding thertfp Setlion t10i ettiitted "Cats" � and shall reaG as failows: • 1105.Qt4. TERMS. As used in this orainance the ': toticwirg term5 mean: - � � pWNER: Any person, partnership or corporatton ; kteping or harboriny a cat or cals; • CAT: Ar1y aftlm8l tha! i5 a membcr of the fetine ; splNeS; • ANiMAlSttEtTER:Anypremisesdesignatedbythe � • Ctty Manager fOr fhe purpase of impou�ding and Cazl� . for animais hetd under aufiwrity ot this mdinance: OFFiCER: My per*,on deslgr�aled by the Cify So ; en+orce me prows�ons a m�s ona�nance; • PERSON: M individual, partnrrsriip, ccmpany or , corporal;on. • tLERK: Mapiawoad City Cterk. 1105.826. PERMtT FEBS. No person shall, wlthout '. tirst obfaining a permit therMar In wrlNng (roen fhe i Cierk, own, ktep, harbor, or have tvstody o! any ca! over tfueC months of age. No inorc lhan two t2) Cats f overlhree (3) months ot age shatl be housed ar be kept { 4n any oeu rEsldentiat sFte in any area W the City zoned raidentiei R�t or R•2. No more ihan one caf of any age shati be kept in a 4wet(ing unit i� any area et tAe City . Zoned R•3. 1105.IX10. PERMlT FBES. A Rermit shatt be tuued for ` each eat mmed, kept or maiMai by any person upan I paymer�! at !ha tee as fotiows• /y,�/ i ta) Far tach tat, 53,38r � Q t^.� tA , • tb} No tet or permit shatl be �equired of any humane , SOciety or vetKirary hospital. ' itO5.Ol0. PERhl1T YEAR. The permFt year shatl • commence on M2rch ] o! eath year and ferminate a% the last dny ot Februaryr W tht toltowing yea�. A t�ew • permit shatl be obfai»ed each year by every owner and � a new tee paid. A permit, if not rewked, shait be valid - untii thc end of the permit year. Rmewal permtts must j ' be obtai�ed p�ior fo March Ist and there 5t�a1! be a late � penalty charge �f 57.00 oa alf renewa! permits issved after Apri! tst of eacb year. ko permit shali bc issued t unlcss thefe fs a certFfFcata of vacGfnatMn for rabTes nOf rt10fG th$l30ti! yCd� QCiOt' 18 ih� Clfpit0t10ROf fh! �iCMSI'. N45.050. REVOCATiON. The Council may rewke any • permit if the person hotding the perm(t refuses or laits ; fo ComplY with fhis ttrtlinance, the regvlatlons ! promulgated bY 1he Counctl, or any siate M lotaf taW � govtminq crue!!y !o animats ar the keeping of an(mats. � Aay pe�son wtwse permtt is rewked shatl, witfiin fen days,thereatter, hvmaneiy dispose ot aU cbt5 beinp �, awntd, kept, or fiarbored bY such persOn and rro part of ihe pefmit tee shall be refvntfed. � 110.5.UEq. TAGS. Upon lssutnq a permit to keep any � caf, tt�e Clerk sha11 Issue ta the owner a metatiic or � durable plastfe tag, stampea wtth an identityin9 M number and witfi the ytar of iswance and w destgned j 'ti�at it may be cortvmtenfiy fastened to a tollar or i harness. Such taq shalt be tutentd ta 1he caMs+bllar or j harne�ssbytheownerandstwlltxwomatalittmes.irie� � Clerk aha!! matnlaln a rccard at the ldeniifytng �um� bers and shalt meke this record aveFiabtt to rire p�tic. 7105.070. RE5TRAINT 8F PREMtSES. it) Ati uts sAali bC kept under restrxint at any ttme � wch cat is oft ot the awners premfses.' . '(2i it shall be the o6ltyetton and responsl6ility � Me ovmer cr tustoClan W any cat !� the tity, whhetixr permanes�Nyar trmporarity iherein, taproveM sutfi ut % from cammittinq any aci which corutitutes a nuisance • as detined herein. , 17Q5.080. NUISANCE. For the purpox of lhis Seclior=, � a cat 5hd11 be deemed to consNfut� a nutsaatexhm: ,(1) Thr wt Is not coniinea to the owner`s ar custadizn's property by adequate fencing or ieasinp, or if !he Cat is att tfia pram35e5 of tht owner or wstodian and is r+ot urtQer controi W ihe awner or custodlan bY n teash not exceeding 0 teet ta length, whm ra! canflnetl in ' a motw vrhicte or caflt. (2) iht tat commits damage fo tht persocf or property ot anyoRe omer than the owner or creates a nvisanca on . the prnperty ot one other than fht owner such as! damaginy property, piaMings, or st►uctures, or wtild� � deposits fecat maferial on property ofher lhan that ot fhe owner, or whicb scratchrs or bita a persort, or � whtch c�les, haw4s or lovdly mews af night 2o disir�rb�� , people other lhan 1he awner. � t3} Failure on tfie part of the owner or cusfotllan to prevent his cat from committing an act of nutsance shati be a petit misdemeanor and shal! be subjed to the penaity provided for wch flftense. , - ' 11Q5.040.IMPOUNDE4CATS.Unrestratr�edcatsmaY , ., . .. 6etafcenbypolice,theetryanimatcorMralofficer,arthe ! , ttumane Society and impoun6cd T�i an animat shelter, . _ and there caniincd in a humanc manner. impounded ;. �� " rat5 shaii�be kept tor rwt tess tha� tive days u=+less � recialmed by their owne.+s. !t by e permFf, tay ar by i`= . other means lho.owner ca� be 3dentifie4, the antmai , .• ' eontro! atf7cer Shalt immediattty upon impoundmmf ' notity fhe awner by teteptwne or mati ot the Im• �,t� p0utrdmmf at the cat. Cals nof claimed by ihetr owners �� -, wift{jn five days st�all be humenely disposed af by an Glassificatian l�o. � �1;�,_. Muni ci pal i ty �� `�-"--�-� Date ��.�'� 1 i � sUa��t �`—� . pp5,1q0, IMPQUNOiNG fEE. Any ownet recialmirtp� }� an aNmal shait paY s iee of =Z•�� Pt'n;�•� for each day . tt�»t the artimat bas been impounded The ownH' may i a�;A�prt�ceedtd against tor vtolatfon of Ihis ordinance , and his;permit may be rtvuked � ti8i.110. FEMALE �A75IN HEAT. Evt�Ytematecat in heat shait be coMined in a bvittling or secnre m- closufe, in SUCh maaner that SUCfi femaie cat cannol i came lnto contaci with anolher cat accept for planned -breeding. itOS.i19. NON-RESlDENSS. The provlsfons hereia rc4ui�ing a permitsha�i not applYto�+��jdetstso! the �;ty who keep the cai under restrsint and are nat kepi wtlt�tn thc CItY tor more than 30 days. i�pg,y3p, ylO1A7l4N ANO PENAII'Y• MY P�� viotaitnq any of ttr provislons ot thSs ordinance shall be �,� 9�ryty of a petit mfsdemeanor and sha11 be vblatlon br continuln9�each daY's vioiat(on shaii be aeemed a separate vtWation. It any persan be fo�nd guilty by a Covr! ot violation W this ord[f�ant4 his permit to own. ketp, fiarbar or riave custodY af n�t �X y �nts shap be deemed automaticallv rewked and +ro new permit mny be issved far a period a oM year � lheredita'. ' 5�� Z. Thts eratnaace shn!! take elted' upan P�9t and Pu�Hcafton. ' Pessed by ihe touncfl oi MC City of .� �p��, /W�nesofe this 17ih daY i '°t hhaY. 1�4. .sJohnGnavu ? . ' MaYcr ! Aittst: •.s. WcUfe E. Aureilus UeNc • Ayts — 5 Nays — 0 tRevieW: MaY 23, 1479i `__ , i � .� a' -'tis ` Y . _ _ � ,�, ,'� •. . . _ .��„ . �� . :+= 1� . � •`�. IN�ORMATION SERVICE League af Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave E. . Paui, MN 55101 � � �Ha . �� _ � _ 9 ai i iCASSON lNOEPEMDEN7 Dodge Co. � �. �,y .'tj . � `} �.; t,, (, �� ; .. � - . a LEGAL �✓ fORDItVANCE ,�JS'73 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING CATS RIJNNING AT LARGE The Coancil of the City of Kas'son, Min- nesota, ardains: . • . ' Subd. I. That the owner of a cat shall nat prrmit or suffer surh animai to be ai large on the private property of another unless the owner of such property actually consents thereio. Subd. 2. For the pnrpose of this secdon, every such cai at targe shall be deemed at Iarge with the permission and at the suf- ferance of its owner, and in the event af a»olatzon of the pravisions of this section, it shatl be no defense that the offending animal escaged or is othcrwise at largr wi'thaut the permission or sufferance of its - owner.: • Subd. 3. Said apprehcnded cats shali be deatt with in keeping with provisions of the , Kasson Ordinance relating to apprehend- ed dogs, Passed by the Council this 18th day of .July, 1984. • � Fatmer Carlsen Mayor ` A'TTEST: Dolores Meyer Clerk-Adminisirator , Pubiished in the Dac3ge County Indepen� �s� dent on July 2S, 1984. . � 26c Classification # � � �j �.� Muni ci pal i ty ��...,c.� �� ,. Date �% — �' =� Subject ' e . 0 ORDINANCE NO. 901 AN ORDINANCE DEFINING NUISANCES, PROHIBITING THEIR CRFATION OR MAINTENANCEAND PROVIDING A PENALN FOR VIOL4TION THEREOF. SECTION 1. PUBLIC NUISANCE DEFINED A nuisance is a thing, act, occupation or use of property which: ;�1.1 \ Shall annoy, injury or endanger the safety, health, comfort or repose of ' •.__, the public; � ,�r 1.2 Shall offend public decency; 1.3 Shall unlawfully interfere with, obstruct, or fiend to obsfiruct or render • dangerous for passage.any public part, square, street, walk, (ane, alley or highway. 1.4 Sha! I in any way render the publ i c insecure in I ife or in use of property. SECTION 2. PUBLIC NUISANCE AFFECTING HEALTH The following are hereby declared to be nuisances affecfiing health: 2.1 All decayed or. unwholesome faod offered for sale to the public; �- 2.2 All diseased animals �unning at (arge; 2.3 Carcasses of animals not buried or destroyed within twenty-four hours affier death; . 2,4 Garbage cans which emit foul or disagreeable odors, can be ove�tumed by dogs, are not rodent-free or fly-tight or are so maintained as to constitute a health hazard; 2,5 All noxious weeds and other rank growths upon public or private property; 2.6, Dense smoke, noxious fumes, gas, soot, o� cinders, in unreasonable quantities; 2.7 All public exposure of persons having a contagious disease; � (901) 1. . d 2.8 The distribution of samples of inedicines or drugs unless such samples are placed in the hands of an aduit person; 2.9 All other acfs, omissions of acts, occupations and uses of property which are deemed by the board of health to be a menace fio the health of the in- habitants of this Village, or any considerable number thereof. SECTION 3. PUBLIC NUISANCES AFFECTING MORALS AND DECENCY The following are hereby declared to be nuisances affecting public morals and decency: 3.1 AI I gambl ing devi ces, slot machines and punch boards; 3.2 All houses kept for the purpose of p�ostitution or promiscuous sexual inter- course, gambling houses, houses of ill fame and bawdy houses; ,� � 3.3 Any vehicle used for fihe illegal transportation of intoxicating liquor or for promiscuous sexual intercourse, or any other immoral purpose; 3.4 All indecent or obscene pictures, books, pamphlets, magazines and news- PpPe�% i 3.5 The public use of profane or obscene language; the use of loud, boisterous � or abusive (anguage in public or which disturbs the publ�ic; or any other act or acts tending to disturbance of the public peace and quite. 3.6 Betting, bookmaking, unlicensed prize fighting, and al) appa�atus used in such occupations. SECTION 4. PUBLIC NUISANCES AFFECTING PEACE AND SAFEN The following are declared to be nuisances affecting public peace and safety: 4.1 All snow and ice not removed from public sidewalks twenty-four hours after the snow and ice has ceased to be deposited thereon; 4.2 All trees, hedges, billboards or other obstructions which prevent persons from having a clea� view of traffic approaching an intersection from across streets in sufficient time to bring a motor vehicle driven at a reasonable , speed to a full stop before the intersection is �eached; . .� (901) 2 i �` 4.3 4.4 All limbs of trees which are less than eight feet above the surface of any public sidewalk or nine feet above the surface of any street; All wires which are strung or hang across public sfireets, alleys, lanes or sidewalks less than fifteen feet above the surface of fihe ground; 4,5 All buildings, walls and other structures which have been damaged by fire, decay or otherwise to an extent exceeding one-half their original value and wh i ch are so si tuated as to endanger the safety of the publ i c; 4.6 All explosive, bottle gas, inflammable I iquids and othe� dangerous sub- stances stored in any manner deemed dangerous by the Building Inspector, fire chief or health officer; �' 4.7 All unnecessary noises and annoyinq vibrations; 4.8 Obstructioru and excavations affecting the`ordinary use by the public of streets, alleys, sidewalks or public grounds except undersuch conditions as are authorized by the Village Council . 4.9 Any use of property abutting on a public street or sidewalk or any use of a public street or sidewalk which causes large crowds of people to gather, obstrucfiing traffic and the free use of the streets or sidewalks; 4.10 All hanging signs, awnings and other similar st�uctures over the streets or sidewalks, so situated as to endanger public safety. 4.11 The allowing of rain water, ice or snow to fall from any building or structure upon any street or sidewalk or to flow across any sidewalk; or waste water cast upon or permitted b flow upon o� across streets or other publ ic property. 4.12 4.13 4.14 � 4.15 All barbed wire fences which are located within three feet of any public sidewalk; All dangerous, unguarded machinery, in any public place, or so situated or operated on private property as to attract the publ ic; Obstructions to the f�ee flow of water in a natural drainageway or a public street drain, gutter or ditch. All other conditions or things which are liable to cause in�ury to the person or property of anyone. (901) 3 % `` � F �C 4.16 The permitting of running at large within the City of any dog: 4.16(1) Which is vicious, dangerous, ferocious, or sick with or liable to communi- cate`hy�c- opho ia or in"�ectious diseases; �~��V��""""""�'""`"""" 4.16 (2) Which disturbs the;�eace anc3.�.,qu.ie,t.,,rz�..'�h�, Cit�by bar)�ing, making other large�or�unusual noises or by running through or across�cult=ivated garderis or fields. _�.._....�.� <�,.�,._...�...�,.�.�,. ��....�...._.�...�.>a...�,.�_�, ..�..._.,...._._..,.— - -e SECTION S. PENALTY Any person, finn or corporation who shall knowingly cause or create a nuisance, or pexntit any nuisance to be created or placed upon or to remain upon any premises ow�ed or occupied by him or them, or in the case of the awner of a dog, who shal.l permtt a dog who is a nuisance as herein defined t�o run at large within the City, shall upon conviction thereof be de�ned guilty of a misd�ne.anor, and shall be punished by a fine or not less than five dollars ($5.00) nor more than three hundred dollars ($300.00) and oosts, or by imprisonment for not less than five days'nor more than ninety days, or both; provided, that in event of failure to pay any fine or oosts assessed upon any'person he may be confined an additional ntunber of days equal to the n�nber of dollars of fine and costs assessed in the case not to exceed three months. SECIrION 6. SEPARABILITY ` _ Evexy section, provision or part of this ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part; and if any section, provisi�n or part hereof shall be held invalid, it shall not affect any other section, provision or part. 9 4 SECTION 7. REP�AL � Al1 ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. (9�l) 4 ORDINANCE NO. 1301 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING DOGS AND CATS, PROVIDING FOR THE LICENSING OF DOGS AND THE IMPOUNDING OF DOGS AND CATS, AND PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS THEREOF. SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS As used in this ordinance, the following terms shall mean: l.l Owner: Any person, group of persons or corporation owning, keeping, or harboring a dog or dogs. The "Harborer" of a dog shall mean any person who laas the custody of-�any dog or permits the same to be kept or to stay on or about his premises. 1.2 1.3 Kennel: Any person, group of persons or corporation engaged in the commercial business of breeding, buying, selling or boarding dogs. At Large: A dog shall be termed to be at large when it is not under restraint as defined in this ordinance. 1.4 Restraint: A dog is under restraint, within the meaning of this ordinance, if it is controlled by a leash not exceeding six feet in length or by a competent person and immediately obedient to that person's command, or if it is within a vehicle being driven or parked on the public streets,, or if it is within the property limits of its owner's premises. l. 5 1.6 1.7 Animal Shelter: Any premises designated by action of the City Council for the purposes of impounding and caring for all animals found in violation of this ordinance. Animal Warden: The person or persons designated by the City Council as the enforcement officer of this ordinance. Health Officer: The Health Officer designated by the City Council. . SECTION 2. LICENSING. � '` 2.1 Except as p�rovided in Section 18, �no person shall own, keep, or harbor any dog within the City limits unless such dog is licensed as herein provided. Written application for such license shall be made to the City Clerk and shall state the •name and address of the owner and the name, breed, color, age and sex of the dog. The license fee shall be paid at the . (1301) 1 ! t �J time of making the application,. a numbered receipt shall be given to the applicant, and a numbered metallic tag shall be issued to the owner. In addition, any owner who makes application for a dog license for any dog six (6) months of age or older shall furnish proof of the date the dog received its last rabies inoculation. No license shall be issued for any dog which has not received a rabies inoculation within the one,two, or three year effective period of the vaccine last used. 2.2 The yearly license fee shall be $6.00 for an unspayed female dog and $3.00 for a spayed female dog or a male dog. 2.3 All dog licenses shall be issued for one year beginning l` • with the first day of June. Application for licenses may be made sixty (60) days prior to the start of the licensing year, and thereafter during the licensing year. Applications made after June 30th of the lioensing year sha1L•�be assessed a penalty of fifty cents (50�) for each late month or portion thereof which amount shall be added to and collected with the regular license fee. Any owner who secures a dog after the start of the license year shall be allowed thirty (30) � days after acquiring such dog to secure a license and must with his application for a dog license file an affidavit identifying the dog and stating the date of its acquisition. Any dog which may be impounded for violations of this chapter, within such thirty-day period may be reclaimed by the owner without paying the impounding fee, but such owner shall be responsible for paying the cost of keeping such dog during its impounding. 2.4 Any dog.owner, upon first becoming a resident of the City of Mendota Heights, shall be allowed thirty (30) days from such time within which to obtain the dog license. Any dog which may be impounded for violations of this chapter, within such thirty (30) day period may be reclaimed by the owner without paying the impounding fee, but such owner shall be responsible for paying the cost of keeping such dog during its impounding. 2.5 An owner of a new born dog or dogs shall be allowed thirteen (13) weeks from the date of birth of such dog or dogs within which to obtain the dog license or licenses required here- under. 2.6 In the event that the�metallic license tag issued for a dog shall be lost or stolen, the owner may obtain a duplicate tag by surrendering the receipt issued for the lost or stolen tag and upon the payment of One Dollar ($1.00). 2.7 If there is a change of ownership of a dog during the license . ._=�ryear, the new owner may have the current license changed to �� - his name by surrendering the receipt issued for the first tag �� - . and upon the payment of a transfer fee of One Dollar ($l. 00) . . (1301) 2 � �: i N SECTION 3. TAG AND COLLAR . 3.1 Upon complying with the provisions of this ordinance, there shall be issued to the owner a metallic tag, stamped with a number and the year for which issued. 3.2 Every owner is required to keep a valid tag securely fastened to the dog's choke chain, collar or harness, which must be worn by the dog at all times. 3.3 No person shall counterfeit an official dog tag of this City, or use such a counterfeit tag, or aid or abet in any such violation of this ordinance.. � j� SECTION 4. RESTRAINT OF ALL DOGS AT ALL TIMES 4.1 No owner of a dog shall permitnhis dog to be at,large in this City, but shall keep such dog under restraint at all times. SECTION 5. CONFINEMENT INDOORS OF CERTAIN DOGS 5.1 The owner of a dog shall confine within a building or secure enclosure every f ierce, dangerous or vicious dog, except when securely muzzled and in the control of a competent person. 5.2 Every female dog in heat shall be confined in a building, secure enclosure, veterinary hospital or boarding kennel. SECTION 6. KEEPINC7 OF NUISANCE DOGS PROHIBITED 6.1 No person shall keep or harbor a dog which habitually barks or cries. Any such dog is hereby declared to be a public nuisance. � 6.2 No person shall keep more than three (3)•do s r cats over four (4) months of -age upon any premises within the i y limits. The keeping of more than three�(3) such dogs.or cats is�hereby declared to be a public nuisance. SECTION 7. BITING 7.1 No owner shall permit his dog to attack or bite a person outside the owner's premises. ♦ i (1301) 3 S�CTION 8. ANIMAL SHELTER 8.1 The City Council may provide for a City-owned animal shelter or may designate as the animal shelter of the City a suitable kennel either within or outside the City. SECTION 9. ANIMAL WARDEN AND ASSISTANTS 9.1 The City Council shall designate the animal warden.and may if it so determines appoint such additional persons as it may deem necessary to aid and�assist such animal warden in the performance of his duties hereunder. All references to the animal warden in this ordinance shall be deemed to include such assistants. Such persons and the police officers of the City shall have police powers to cite owners of dogs� ' for violations of this Ordinance, in addition to their powers in impounding dogs. SECTION 10. IMPOUNDING DOGS 10.1 The Animal Warden and his assistants and any police officer of the City may take up and impound any dog found not to be kept, confined or restrained in the manner required by this Ordinance. To enforce this Ordinance, such officers may enter upon private premises where it appears or where there is reasonable cause to believe that a dog is not being kept, confined or restrained as herein required. Any dog so impounded shall be confined in the Animal Shelter in a humane manner for a period of not less than six (6) days, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, if not claimed prior thereto by its owner. Thereafter said dog shall become the property•of the City, may be disposed of in a humane manner or may be sold to or placed in the custody of some other suitable person. If a dog is destroyed pursuant to this chapter, the license for such dog shall expire. 10.2 Immediately upon the impounding of license, the animal warden shall ma to notify the owner of such dog of of the conditions whereby the owner the dog. Any verbal notices shall in writing by the animal warden. SECTION 11. REDEMPTION OF IMPOUNDED ANIMALS a dog.wearing a current ke every reasonable effort such impoundment and may regain custody of immediately be confirmed Any dog impounded hereunder, not being held for suspected disease, may be reclaimed by the owner within six (6) days, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, upon payment of the owne� to the City of an impounding fee of Ten Dollars ($10.00) for the first redemption, Twenty-Five Dollars ($25.Q for the second-redemption in a twelve-month period, and Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the third redemp.ti,on in a twelve- month period, plus the cost of the City for keeping such dog f 13011 4 � +J in the City Animal Shelter. If the dog so reclaimed requires a license under the provisions of this Ordinance, such license shall be obtained before such dog is released. SECTION 12. INTERFERENCE No person shall interfere with, hinder or molest the animal warden or any of his assistants or any police officer in the performance of their duties hereunder, or seek to release any animal in the custody of the animal warden except as herein provided. SECTION 13. KILLING DOGS WHICH CANNOT BE IMPOUNDED j°� If a dog is diseased, vicious, danqerous, rabid or exposed to rabies and such dog cannot be impounded after a reasonable effort, or cannot be impounded without seriouso-risk to the persons attempting to impound, such dog may be immediately killed. SECTION 14. DISEASED ANIMALS ?� 14.1 Whenever the animal warden, any police officer, or the Health Officer have reason to believe that any do or cat in the City of Mendota Heights has been expose to rabies, or whenever the ani.mal warden, any City police off icer, or the Health Officer has reason to believe that a dog or a cat has ! bitten any person within the City of Mendota Heights, the animal warden, any City police off icer, or the Health Off icer is hereby authorized and empowered to take such dog or cat to�the Animal Shelter and there keep such dog or cat for such time as the Health Officer shall order, to give the Health Officer an opportunity to determine whether such dog or cat is diseased and no diseased dog or cat shall be killed unless so ordered by the Health Officer. The cost of keeping such dog• or cat in the City Animal Shelter shall be paid by the owner of such dog or cat. Such impounding may be by-the owner who must keep such dog or cat inaccessible to other animals and confined within a building approved by the Health Officer and the owner shall furnish proof in writing that such dog or cat is being impounded, unless a complaint is signed by the person bitten, or a parent or legal guardian of the person bitten, which requires impoundment at the City Animal Shelter. On expiration of such impoundment period by the owner, if the dog or cat does not have rabies, it may be released, and the Health•Off icer shall be notif ied just prior to such release. If the dog or cat is impounded in the Animal Shelter, such dog or,cat may be reclaimed on expiration of such impoundment period�after payment by the owner of the costs of such •~ impoundment . ' - • . ,� �` r* � (1301) 5 � SECTION 15, REPORTS OF BITE CASES 15.1 It shall be the duty of every physician or any other person to report to the animal warden the names and addresses of persons treated for bites inflicted by animals within the City� of Mendota Heights, together with such other information as will be helpful in rabies control and the animal warden shall immediately inform the Health Officer of such report. SECTION 16. RESPONSIBILITIES OF VETERINARIANS 16.1 It shall be the duty of every licensed veterinarian to report . to the animal warden his diagnosis of any animal within the �� City of Mendota Heights observed by him as a rabies suspect and the animal warden shall immediately inform the Health Officer of such report. � SECTION 17. I�tVESTIGATION 17.1 For the purposes of discharging the duties imposed by this Ordinance and to enforce its provisions, the animal warden or any police off icer of this City is empowered to enter upon the premises upon which a dog is kept or harboered and to demand the exhibition by the owner of such dog and/or the license for such dog. The animal warden or any police officer may enter the premises where any animal is kept in a reportedly cruel or inhumane manner and demand to examine such animal and to take possession of such animal when in his opinion it requires humane treatment. SECTION 18. EXEMPTIONS 18.1 Hospitals, clinics and other premises operated by licensed veterinarians exclusively for the care and treatment of animals are exempt from the provisions of this chapter except where such duties are expressly stated. __ 18.2 The licensing requirements of this chapter shall not apply to any dog belonging to a non-resident of the City and kept within the City for not longer than thirty (30) days provided that all such dogs shall at all times while within the City be kept under restraint. SECTION 19. RECORDS 19.1 It shall be to be kept, impoundment .custody. the duty of the animal warden to keep or cause accurate and detailed records of the licensing, and disposition of all animals coming into its (1301) 6 1' � 19.2 It shall be the duty of the Health Officer to keep,'or cause to be kept, accurate and detailed records of all bite cases reported to hi.m and his investigation of the same. _ 19.3 The animal warden shall account for and pay over monthly to the City any money received by him on behalf of the City hereunder, and shall also give an accurate written report each month to the City Council sta�ting all monies collected, all dogs impounded and the duration of impoundment, and all dogs des�royed. SECTION 20. Any person violating any of the provisions of this ,� Ordinance shall, upon conviction therefor, be punished by a f ine � of not to exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), or by imprisonment for not to exceed ninety (90) days, or both. (1301) 7 � � �i� �I� !� Ci I� !� k�rlt tM�� ts�! e�l/� .,...�r :..�r :...ri. .w.�e� .�.+rr .w.� �+rr .� iNCTIC}N DEPART`M�NT �PT• Nb• E� ACTIt�'�Y • � Public Safety • .Animal Control 90 PURPOSE MAJOR OBJECTIVES FOR 1991 Mitigate pzoblenns associated with non-com.plian.ce with laws 1. Maintain �xisting level a£ service. relating to keeping animats in the City. DESCRIPTIQN Responds ta requests an.d complaints £or animal control, captura and cantainment. Patrots foz vialations of reiated laws as re- quested and directed by the Palice Department. Impounds, boazds and destroys aaimals as aeeded. Picks up and disgoses of road-killed and injured animals. 0 Animal Contral W4RK MEASURES AND GQALS 1988 1989 1. Dog licenses issued. , ]24 239 2 Animal bites regorted. d 8 8 3. Miscellaneous animal calls. 187 185 � 1990 YTD 106 3 90 1990 1991. ANTIG ANTIC. 26Q.,.� 260 8 8 1$5 180 .�rr� .� 4 ��. �r ...�� .rr. FORM 0-2 �'4 � ANIMAL CONTROL Personal Services Contractual Services Commodities , Other Charges Capital Outlay" TOTAL � , BUDGET 1988 1989 1990 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET 0 .2,680 0 150 0 2,830 0 2,430 0 140 0 2,570 0 3,500 0 100 0 3,600 �..+..� ��.� �r� W� �/ / 1990 TO 1990 1991 6/15/90 ESTIMATE BUDGET 0 0 0 560 3,500 3,500 0 0 0 50 100 100 0 0 0 610 3,600 3,600 � r, } � � , FORM 0-4A BACK-UP DETAIL FOR CONTRACTUAL SERVICE _X_ COMMODITIES _ OTHER CHARGES _ (CHECK ONE) FUNCTION DEPT. DEPT. NO ACTIVITY SERVICE LEVEL Public Safety Animai Control 90 Animal Controi Maintenance LINE ITEM LINE ITEM DETAIL COST 4221 Retainer 2,500 4225 Impounding Fees 100 ' .' 'A , TOTAL 2�600 � � LJ � �' � � � } ; � � � � �ROM 0-4C BACK-UP DETAIL FOR GONTRACTUAL SERVICE _ CC?MM4DlTIES _ OTHER CHARGES _X {CHECK ON� FUNCTlQN D�PT. DEPT, NO ACT1VlTY SERViCE LEVEL Pubiic Safety Animai Contral 90 Animai Control Maintenance LINE tTEM LlNE lTEM DETAlL C4ST 4490 Sundry - License Tags 100 x� TOTAL � p{� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Eul� May 30, 1991 TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administrator FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Zoning Ordinance Recodification INTRODUCTION - On May 21st, City Council discussed the Zoning Ordinance recodification process and gave direction on changes to the B-2 District uses. Councilmembers Koch and�Smith expressed � desire to meet with staff to review the document. Council consensus was to table action on the matter to the June 4th meeting. INFORMATION Administrator Lawell, Kevin Batchelder and I met with Councilmembers Smith and Koch yesterday afternoon. The meeting was productive for staff and, hopefully, helpful for the Councilmembers. As one result of the meeting, a change has been made in the ordinance to correct an error in Section 5.9(7), (Comprehensive Plan amendment requirements). The provision requires approval by a majority of Council, whereas it should require a 4/5th majority. The correction has been made in the master copy of the ordinance draft. During our discussion, a concern was raised with respect to commercial/industrial landscaping and screening requirements. At the recent direction of Council, staff has requested copies of these requirements from several communities. Within the past few days, we have received provisions currently in effect in Edina, Eden Prairie, Plymouth and Burnsville. Preliminary language for a proposed new section is attached. The section was developed by combining parts of the sample ordinances. The requirements are quite demanding and perhaps more onerous than Council would desire or than is practical. They do, however, provide a basis for discussion. After receiving consensus from Council on landscaping/screening needs, I will put the requirements into final form for inclusion in the final draft which will be referred to the Planning Commission for public hearing. In addition to the landscaping/screening attachment, changes have been made in the B-2 permitted and conditional use lists in accordance with May 21st Council direction. The following y � formerly proposed permitted uses have been removed from the B-2: diaper or laundry service; drapery shop; furniture store; limited to a maximum size of (Ethan Allen building square footage); interior decorating studio; locksmith; medical and dental clinic; picture framing studio; and nutrition counseling studio. All of the foregoing uses except nutrition counseling studio are currently permitted in the B-3 District, and have been returned to the B-3 permitted use list in the proposed ordinance. Two conditional uses, auto service station (motor fuel station) and single bay car wash attached to motor fuel station, have been removed from the B-2 conditional use list. Motor fuel stations are allowed only as conditional uses in B-4 and I Districts. Free-standing car washes are allowed by conditional use in the B-4 District. The proposed Zoning Ordinance retains motor fuel stations as conditional uses only in B-4 and I Districts, but changes the B-4 conditional use "car wash" to the conditional use "single bay car wash attached to motor fuel station." � • ' Responding to concerns expressed by engineering staff, I also propose that a change be made to Section 21.1(3)a of the draft ordinance. The language in the current draft changes driveway widths from "not less than 24 feet" to "not more than twenty-five feet." The purpose of the change was to impose a maximum driveway width for residential purposes. This section of the ordinance, however, is non-specific as to district. Consequently, the driveway width will apply to all districts. There is a concern that 25 feet is not sufficient for commercial and industrial needs. It is therefore suggested that the section be revised to read as follows: "21.1(3)a Access and Location. Parking areas shall be designed to provide an adequate means of access to a. public alley or street. Said driveway access shall not be more than twenty-five (25) feet in width at the property line in residential districts and not more than thirty (30) feet in width at the centerline of the public street in all other districts, and shall be so located as to cause the least interference with traffic movement." RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Council review the changes proposed in this memo and the attachment, give staff direction on desired revisions, and direct staff to schedule a public hearing before the Planning Commission on June 25th. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should direct staff to publish notice and schedule a Planning Commission hearing for Zoning Ordinance recodification on Tuesday, June 25th; s GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL B AND I ZONING DISTRICTS: (proposed new section) 4.17(4) Landscaping 4.17(4) Landscape plan requirement Landscape plans prepared by a registered landscape architect shall be submitted as part of the application for building permit or site plan approval. Landscape plans shall be drawn to a scale of not less than one inch equals 50 feet and shall include the following information: 4.17(4)a Boundary lines of the property with accurate dimensions; 4.17(4)b Locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking ' lots, roads and other improvements; • 4.17(4)c Location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; 4.17(4)d Planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials and root condition. 4.17(4)e Planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; 4.17(4)f Details of restoration of disturbed area including areas to be sodded or seeded; 4.17(4)g Locations and details of other landscape features . including berms, fences and planter boxes; 4.17(4)h Location and details of irrigation systems; and details and cross sections of all required screening. 4.17(5) 4.17(5)a Minimum landscapinq requirements: At least 25% of the land area shall be landscaped with grass, approved ground cover, shrubbery and trees. 4.17(5)b At least five per cent (5�) of the land area within a parking area shall be landscaped. 4.17(5)c The following minimum sizes shall be required at the time of planting: Overstory Deciduous Trees Ornamental Trees Coniferous Trees Major Shrub Plantings 2 1/2 inches 1 1/2 inches 6 feet tall 5 gallons in diameter in diameter 4.17(5)d A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. 4.17(5)e All new overstory trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from the growing site by tree spade. 4.17(5)e Al1 site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways, patios or similar hard surface materials shall be sodded, except those areas to be preserved in a natural state, provided, however, that areas reserved for future building expansions may be seeded. 4.17(5)e Not more than 50 percent of the required trees shall be composed of one species. tree shall be any of the following: Y number of No required 1. a species of the genus Ulmus (except those elms bred to be immune to Dutch Elm disease; 2. box elder; 3. a species of the genus Populous (poplar) 4. female ginko 4.17(5)f In order to provide for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development except additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas except areas to be preserved in the natural state. 4.17(6) 4.17(7) Maintenance of landscaping The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan and which have died shall be replaced as soon as seasonal or weather conditions allow. Landscaping bond requirement When screening, landscaping or similar improvements to property are required by this ordinance, a performance bond shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least one and one-half times the value of such � � h screening, landscaping, or other improvements. The bond, with security satisfactory to the city, shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering, legal or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The bond shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to one full growing season after the date of installation of the landscaping. The city may accept a letter of credit, cash escrow or equivalent in lieu of a bond in an amount and under such conditions as the city may determine to be appropriate. In the event construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by the City Council, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the owner and the surety. The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping.if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is granted, the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. 4.17(8) Screening and Buffering: 4.17(8)a Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto shall be buffered from lots used for any residential purpose. 4.17(8)b Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within 50 feet, and from lots which are used for any-residential purpose. 4.17(8)c Outside storage which is allowed by other provisions of this ordinance shall be screened from all public views. 4.17(8)d External loading and service areas must be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, except at access points. 4.17(8)e Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges or other landscape materials. The screen shall provide a minimum opacity of 90% during all seasons. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. �� ` _ ' ' � l'V �'X h�'�'31�'� �� SURV�Y FQA. �'�` T �_- Prepa��'e�! Byr. ss a� � ,: - . • 2~�2� � �� . . � ..�._ `�.�� NCIC�TI� t'=��' --_._._,_ ; f ti1 � �s�,:�c _ . -��Qtr3.!$ - t?��L -�6�..�q ��c�a��.. � �,�.�st��, �i�'�. • Erzginerzrs • Surveyors * �tanners • SQe�s Tesiing : �os5a ufay�ata �c�u#evara � ti�ir�neionlca, tut�ti_ 55343 ��sa.�� ,' „� � ' �� Te�_ ��8 7SQ� ; � "�� .�t� �v . { �Q '\, p�, . �-�� `� � � -.; .. : � � . �,-�� 8?: -�, _ �.-�. c9�.�,�. � � •• •� ,. --� � •'` ,p c. r �.'1,� t . �f f /1 ��s�3 1 �4f.3 ' ~��g ��`� �,-r'" _\� � �",� I ` ` 4 �� \�. `'�� r ` � � �. ./� �'~ '4' �`� � 'Sro Q•�•- �`�� ! � `'�' /' '"' �4 � 1 ..p.. � �.. `� . � � � �,,� s � � � �. o�� `� � � � ��y3��` �� -�'1i � 1 � `` t � f" � � �•�.. . ^ �,a � � '! � ll. : � _ , 1 �. 2 t�''� j _.,,� � �-- t _.._, � � �c8� �,. � �„t• 1 �"`�a i$t • �, � ,¢,� (`$L�'� �"""" i!' `'�`;.��` � � '��-�j j ,t:�` � � � ., � � ,X' Is ,,,_,,..�...� x � �`/ _��r"'i l-�jC� _ �i ~ � ? � S = �'�Gtiy/ • A i ..� `J.- +' �` r� V"'``''°''' � . ,Q� � ) +''N, _',�^.L � / . � i?� �,+ � .,�^- •F ^` L �.t��y �1,% '.,�L• ��„t•<• }�F `� � , r�, f !p`a'_ �\ �'� i�q 3^� t w `� �0 101 1, �"� , , P� \:� •/.J.~�A ��r� .� �rs �,r �,�- ,,.. �'> > I,r r �, ��C.�-'' �: �- ,/,': C"' --' ;-'` t ` .. r"' �•,. O �fi �.;� I r�" ,�-+"' { � \; �,. �� '1'Q /' :� �... yc ,�cy o i A,�,�� ,```` � .�. � r- •r\ � ��i�+� Q� l � , � • .�' "`~`.�`V�i'S" . � • i.j �el+ . � :� 8't13.'S �Zevi�,eci `,��.zm�er 4�1r, l989 � �o Stu�l it8�f �iDllSe' �a�a�iarE t o� M P�ttac. -\� �� c3 rk ��J�tL. • �� t`t = i L,, t_ �a,�-=�.�.-- . ' - � - - i �,...�-.,� --,. � -�.._�.t-�tq."�O M 1 Z��^t.i�: � $C�.O.-� � ItFSCRCP`iFQl � _ �^ Lot 3. 6�'ock 4. N1t.YPSftFRE E�TI�Z£5. BEkG�M�RK . �tT�i Oi� 7fiCOd Stdite t25 5�lON2t.' �t.'Y'd#iKt �$7?.�� {�i3- :�'��. �E�.aAC �iOTES; . ij s � Denotes iron rtionunent foc�d. z3 O - �@patGs ia^tltt !'i0nttt�nt Se�C. 3j � - tie�ates 4rnad stake. 6�) z652.S - Oerate qcis�9ag spat �e:Qvatioa. Sj x�3�a3.�} -�tenotes pro�osed SRat eiEratiaa. ti j -�---- -#knates dz rectfaa of <urfac� �c`aii�age. -7j Propa�es� garage floox' eIE�dLiast Q 812.00. I her+eti,y c�rtify Lt�►t this s7sr�ney ka�: p�►ared ander �f ,� su�rt►i�foct �nd uia�L I ae a�icensed Lart� Surveyar • ur,d�c t�he ia�rs of the S�ate of l�Yirtne:o� .. � � �� .�,� ' - o6ore U. iGem�f� €.ar�d Sarveyor i't`t Li�. in. I: tt?6 Date: Scpte�ber a, I989 �y rs� /x,.fl� ,�.� ,,2�i �,'��-xl �Cl �� 'l X 2' �:�,� Q:�.L•c��1 9 x � Yr�vtlS�.l-�` �1-t+�1� �7t� . ��=7�! �`�'-c.'G�� ... _ ... ...._... . . '._: • . . .. .... . ... .. . . . . _ , E� ! � i � � � /i � / zZ __� � I ` . � � � � 4 ��%C'! cd�.15 �� t i j t � . . ' � ' ! q�'.G6r-� 21' . t -�. � o �z f �tvt�'�Q� ' � �'t�Cia7 � i ixz i ! I �� v��..� - �� 9 �+ SNI��► I ' � � • � � ' ,� � , L -----� � < r� r- '