1991-04-16�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
APRIL 16� 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of the April 2nd and April 9th Board of Review
Minutes.
5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the April 9th Parks and Recreation
Commission Minutes.
b. Acknowledgment of the March Treasurer's Report.
* c. Adoption of Resolutions for Bond Refinancing for
Lexington Heights Apartment - RESOLIITION NO. 91-15
(Series A) and RESOLIITION NO. 91-16 (Series B).
d. Approval to Purchase Asphalt Hot Box.
e. Approval Soo Line Railroad Agreement -
RESOLIITION NO. 91-17 '
f. Approval of Computer Storage Expansion. �
g.� Approval of the List of Contractors. �
h. Approval of the List of Claims. �
** i. Acknowledgment of Tree Donation for City Hall - Mendota �
Heights Garden Club.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Public Comments
� ** 7. Bid Award
a. Mendakota Park Building - Award of Bids
8. IInfinished and New Business
a. Discussion of Furlong Assessment Roll.
b. Discussion of United Properties Request for Tax
Increment Financing - Lennox Companies.
c. 1990 Annual Fire Department Report.
d. Discussion on Highway 13 and Pilot Knob Road Utilities
Feasibility Study - RESOLIITION NO. 91-18
** e. Set Clased Caunci3 Meeting Date for April 17, 1991 -
5:30 P.M. ta Discus� Centex Corporation Li�iga�ion.
9. Council Comments
10. Adjourn
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 16, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for April 16th Council Meeting
Three items have been added to the agenda (**). Additional
information has been submitted for item 5c (*). Due to the
addition of the Bid Awards Section, please note that the numbering
on the agenda has been changed starting from the Bid Award Section
and down. �
3. Aqenda Adoption
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda
printed on pink paper.
5c. Adoption of Resolution for Bond Refinancinq
See attached memo. --�� � � • �
5i. Acknowledgment of Tree Donation for City Hall -
Mendota Heiqhts Garden Club
See attached memo submitted for information only.
7a. BID AWARD
See attached memo regarding the Mendakota Park Building -
Award of Bids.
8e. Set Closed Session to Discuss Centex Litiqation
MTL:kkb
Page No. 3011
Apri1�2, 1991
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, April 2, 1991
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held-at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Blesener, Cummins, Koch and Smith.
AGENDA ADOPTION Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting, further
revised to move consideration of the Southeast
Area land use study to section six of the
agenda. -
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
minutes of the March 5, 1991 regular meeting
with�correction.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
minutes of the March 19, 1991 regular meeting
with corrections.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Koch moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a.
��
Acknowledgment of the minutes of the March
16th Planning Commission meeting.
Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement
monthly report for March.
c. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-12, "A
RESOLUTION OPPOSING-THE SELECTION OF THE
NORTHERN CANDIDATE SEARCH AREA AS THE NEW
M1�TOR AIRPORT SITE."
Page No. 3012
April 2, 1991
d. Approval of the sale of the Fire
Department rescue vehicle to the Cannon
Falls Fire Department for their high bid
of $10,649.00.
e. Approval of the purchase of a sewer jet
from Flexible Pipe Tool Co. for their low
bid of $63,730.38 (after trade-in of the
existing sewer jetter).
f. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-13,
"RESOLUTION APPROVIIJG FINAL PLAT FOR
RIVERWOOD PLACE 2ND ADDITION."
g. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated April 2, 1991 and attached
hereto.
h. Approval of the list of claims dated April
2, 1991 and totalling $181,193.56.
i. Approval of issuance of a purchase order
for 2 1991 Chevrolet Caprice police
vehicles from Grossman Chevrolet pursuant
to State Contract M-3551, for a total cost
not to exceed $25,796.
j. �,doption of Resolution No. 91-14, "A
RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FINAL PLAN FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT AT RIVERWOOD PLACE," to allow
a six foot sideyard setback for a monument
sign, along with approval of the issuance
of a permit for a sign consistent with
plans dated March 15, 1991.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0 .
SOUTHEAST AREA STUDY Council acknowledged a memo from the City
Administrator regarding a proposal from City
Planner Tim Malloy for reassessment of
appropriate land uses in the Southeast Area.
Mr. Malloy reviewed the proposal for Council
and summarized the process proposed for re-
examining the southeast area plan amendment.
He explained that several things must be
considered in the process, including: whether
there were any errors in the original
amendment; whether conditions have changed
substantially since the amendment was adopted;
Page No. 3013
April 2, 1991
issues with respect to airport operations;
changes in surrounding land uses, including
land uses changes in Eagan which have impacted
traffic; and community consensus. He
indicated that the study would take eight to
ten weeks and would cost between $10,000 and
$12,000, including a transportation
engineering study by Short Elliot Hendrickson
which is estimated to cost $2,850.
Mayor Mertensotto statec� that the study is not
budgeted and he was not prepared for a$10,000
to $12,000 expenditure.� He further stated
that his concern for reassessment of the study
was prompted by litigation on development in
the area. He pointed out that two new Council
members were elected since the initial study
was completed and that MSP airport hubbing
� operations changes have caused a dramatic
increase in air traffic over the area. He
stated that it is clear that Council will
never arrive at an agreement to permit what
the Centex has requested for the area. The
land is zoned R-1, and in one of the proposals
submitted by Centex, single-family development
was proposed east of the power line..,.He
stated that he is not interested in doing a
new study and that if there is some merit to
the �ingle family development proposal Council
should explore it and proceed in getting the
Comprehensive Plan amended in that direction.
He did not think Council would be interested
in the magnitude of the study proposed at this
time but must see if there is a basis to
negotiate between the city and the developer.
He stated that he knows the land will not be
developed entirely as single family, nor will
it be what the developer wanted. He informed
the audience that Mr. Malloy was asked to put
together a methodology to study the area, but
that what is proposed is much more accelerated
and costly than is necessary.
Mr. Malloy stated that it is important to make
sure that any change to the plan be looked as
thoroughly as possible to be sure conditions
justify an amendment.
Councilmember Cummins asked for costs for
phase one of the proposal - basic analysis of
the data through joint workshop with the
Planning Commission. Mr. Malloy estimated
that part of the cost at approximately $3,000
to $3,500.
Page No. 3014
April 2, 1991
Councilmember Cummins suggested that Council
authorize the first phase and then decide
whether it is�appropriate to proceed further.
There was discussion over the need for the SEH
traffic study, and Mr. Malloy informed Council
that he would reduce the scope of the SEH work
to keep the total cost to $3,500. He informed
Council that the study should be available by
the first Council meeting in May.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she will
not vote in favor of the study. She further
stated that there is a Comprehensive Plan in
place that covers everything Council could
negotiate with the land owners. She felt that
time and money would be better spent sitting
down and negotiating with the developers.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that protracted
litigation is not in the best interest of the
City or the developer, and felt that Mr.
Malloy should be authorized to work on the
study while the City negotiates with the
developer.
Mr. Dick Putnam, from Putnam Associates, and
Mr. �'om Boyce, from Centex, were present for
the discussion. Mr. Putnam stated that he has
received a copy of the staff report and the
proposal from Mr. Malloy and has questions as
to what is prompting the study.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that Mr. Malloy is
appearing before Council at his request. He
stated that many things have occurred since
the southeast area amendment, including the
loss of a referendum for a park on the Centex
property. He further stated that one of the
Centex proposals which was before the Planning
Commission was a sketch outlining single
family east of the power line and some west of
the power line. He pointed out that he
realizes that the developer asked for severe
changes to the minimum lot area requirement,
but independent of that, the proposal might be
the basis for negotiations.
Mr. Putnam stated that the original southeast
amendment was far more extensive than he
assumes is now proposed, and that $3,500 is
not much for updating a comprehensive plan.
He asked what information Council will receive
Page No. 3015
April 2, 1991
from this study that it does not already have
if Mr. Malloy does not deal with traffic and
does little analysis of the airport issue. He
asked whether Mr. Malloy will look at
information on the increase in flights over
Copperfield, Hampshire and Kensington which
will result from the narrowing of the flight
corridor when he makes a recommendation on
land uses based on increased overflights.
Mr. Malloy responded that the corridor change
will be addressed and that he would also be
addressing the noise attenuation ordinance and
whether the ordinance is what is best for the
City.
Mr. Putnam stated that there was a moratorium
on development of Copperfield because the City
was developing the noise attenuation
ordinance, and it would be inconsistent to say
that the southeast area study was driven by
the freeway noise issue. He pointed out that
there have been traffic studies as recent as
the Anderson study for the recently proposed
commercial development at Mendota Heights Road
and T.H. 149, which showed a reduction in
traffic from what was envisioned in the 1985
southeast area study. He asked what the
purpQse of the study is now as opposed to five
months ago or two years from now.
Mayor Mertensotto responded that it is driven
by the fact that the City could be in
litigation for a year or more, which will do
no one any good, and that ultimately the
analysis will help Council decide whether
there is a basis for looking at the plan for
single family development which the developers
brought before the Planning Commission before
the litigation started.
Councilmember Blesener asked why the City has
not made any overtures to negotiation and
stated that the basis of the proposed study
will probably be information that is already
available. Mayor Mertensotto responded that
the study will determine the validity of the
factors that were available when the southeast
area study was done plus reflect what has
changed since that time.
Councilmember Cummins stated that without
regard to the lawsuit the City has a piece of
undeveloped property where circumstances have
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1 Blesener
Page No. 3016
April 2, 1991
changed and that it seems an appropriate time
to decide whether moving in the direction
Council was moving in 1985 is still
appropriate. Ae also pointed out that there
are two new Council members who did not go
through the debate over land use in the area.
Mr. Putnam stated that the developers have
provided streets, they withheld zoning so that
the City could go to a referendum, utilities
were installed and right-of-way for Mendota
Heights Road was dedicated. He felt that it
is unfair to compare his ten acre site at Dodd
Road, which is totally undeveloped, to the
Kensington site which is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and is being developed.
With respect to the residential development
proposal, he stated that the plan was
submitted to staff and the Planning
Commission, and that after the Commission
meeting the developers were convinced they
must pursue other avenues.
Councilmember Smith stated that the southeast
area amendment was adopted based on certain
assumptions, and if those assumptions are no
longer valid because of changes that have •
occurred it would be inaccurate and misleading
to r�tain the amendment. ,
Councilmember Cummins moved to retain Dahlgren
Shardlow Uban to conduct phase one of the
southeast area study at a maximum cost of
$3,500 conditioned upon report submission by
May 1st.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins was excused from the
meeting.
PUBLIC CONIl�lENTS Mr. Joe Meaghre was present to complain about
air noise and ask when the proposed corridor
will be implemented. Mayor Mertensotto
responded that the City has no jurisdiction
over the FAA, but has spent considerable time
and money on the air noise issue.
Administrator Lawell stated that staff is in
contact with the MAC on a weekly basis and
that Jeff Hamiel indicated last week that the
FAA was within two weeks of determining
whether or not to approve the proposal. He
Page No. 3017
April 2, 1991
also stated that changes affecting runway 11L
will be handled locally.
Mr. Meagher asked that the City contact Mr.
Hamiel again to find out how long the change
will take and also find out why the Highland
flights are coming over his neighborhood. He
informed Council that unless something is done
soon he is not going to pay his first half
property taxes and will use that money to
install triple glazed windows in his home.
HEARING - US WEST Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
CUP FOR ANTENNAS purpose of a public hearing on an application
CASE NO. 91-07 from U.S. West for a conditional use permit to
install a cellular telephone equipment
building on the City's public works
garage/water tank site. U.S. West also wishes
to place nine cellular antennas on the water
tank.
Mr. Bernie Wong, from U.S. West, and the
firm's legal representative, Mr. Jay
Littlejohn, were present for the discussion.
Mr. Littlejohn stated that the applicant is
requesting a conditional use permit to locate
a cellular antenna site on City property. He
revi�wed drawings of the proposal, informing
Council that it is an extremely low power
system. The structure is proposed to be
located east of the water tank and will house
radios and computer switching equipment which
will be monitored 24 hours a day. The
exterior of the structure will match the
existing city buildings on the site and
considerable landscaping will be installed to
screen the structure from the single family
dwelling north of the property. The antennas
will not extend above the tank and will be
mounted on the stem of the tank.
Mayor Mertensotto asked whether U.S. West
would expand the size of the proposed 12 by 36
foot structure to 24 by 36 feet for storage of
the Mend-Eagan equipment which is currently
stored in the water tank. Mr. Littlejohn
responded that this would be possible.
Councilmember Blesener pointed out that
consideration is being given to expanding the
public works garage and�asked whether the
structure could be tied into the public works
facility with a wing wall or screening wall.
Page No. 3018
April 2, 1991
Mr. Littlejohn responded that the proposed
building must be within 100 feet of the
antenna.
Councilmember Blesener asked whether the City
is likely to receive a similar request from
Cellular One. She expressed concern over
setting a precedent. Mr. Wong responded that
Mendota Heights is not in the Cellular One
search area.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would not
consent to the conditional use permit until
there was an overall lease agreement under
consideration. He asked whether there is any
microwave technology involved in the proposal,
stating that microwave technology would be
prohibited because of the public works site's
proximity to the airport. Mr. Littlejohn
responded that there is not, that U.S. West is
a land line carrier, and it is unlikely it
would ever be a microwave carrier. It was
noted that the proposal has been submitted to
the FAA for review and approval and that if it
is denied by the FAA it cannot be built.
Councilmember Blesener felt that the proposed
$700 per month lease is not an appropriate
bene�it to the City in trade for putting the
building on City property and that the storage
space suggested by the Mayor and other
benefits to the City should be explored more
fully. She also stated that she would like to
explore the possibility of City use of,
cellular technology.
Administrator Lawell stated that U.S. West has
provided a list of cities with which they have
leases, and that West St. Paul, which is not
on the list, has adopted a fee schedule with
rates of about $200 per antenna per month. A
lease based on the West St. Paul schedule
would amount to about $2,000 per month for the
U.S. West proposal.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that even if the
lease were for $1,500 to $2,000 per month he
would not be interested.• He pointed out that
U.S. West would be locating a building on city
property for private gain. He felt that the
proposal should include expanding the
structure for Mend-Eagan storage.
Page No. 3019
April 2, 1991
Councilmember Blesener asked Planner Malloy to
work with the applicants to develop a plan to
site the building in its expanded size to
blend better with the public works expansion
and make it more compatible. Mr. Malloy
responded that the structure must be
reasonably close to the water tower and he
does not know how inflexible U.S. West will be
with respect to the cable run. He stated that
his firm encourages cellular users to find
water towers because freestanding facilities
are problems in many ways. Ae pointed out
that the firm's service area is relatively
small and well defined, and if they do not
locate on the tower they will probably have to
be back to request a location somewhere in the
vicinity with a free-standing tower. ,
Councilmember Smith stated that she has a
concern over setting precedent and that
although the antennas would be less
conspicuous on the water tower she has concern
about using public property. She further
stated that she would like to look at other
towers where the firm has installations. Mr.
Littlejohn responded that he will provide
pictures for Council review.
Coun�ilmember Blesener suggested continuing
the discussion and asking the applicants to
come back with a proposal that has more to
offer in terms of design of the building,
lease details, and pictures of other
installations.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that staff should
make contact with the IDS and First National
Bank property management to see what they
charge for antennas on their structures and
also get a copy of the West St. Paul fee
schedule. He pointed out that a 25 year lease
is proposed and asked for a bond guaranteeing
the lease payment over the 25 year contract -
some guarantee that the financing will be
available.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience. There were no
questions or comments.
It was the consensus of Council to continue
the hearing to May 7th.
Page No. 3020
April 2, 1991
CASE NO. 91-06, KATZ Mr. Paul Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, was present
to request approval of a critical area site
plan to replace an existing second story deck
on his home with a larger deck with a covered
screen portion. Mr. Katz also requested a
sideyard conformance variance for his
residence which is located two feet (at its
nearest point) to the property line. He
stated that the house was built in the 1950's
and encroached on the setback.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if there were any
neighborhood objections. Administrative
Assistant Batchelder stated that Mr. and Mrs.
Frye had notified him that they were not going
to submit a letter of objection.
It was pointed out by Council that the
variance consideration is only to bring the
existing house into conformance and is not
related to the deck.
Councilmember Blesener moved to approve an 8
foot sideyard conformance variance to the
north property line for the existing house and
approval of the modified critical area site
plan for the proposed deck and screened
portion of the deck.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
FU�LONG AREA Council acknowledged a report from Engineer
IMPROVEMENTS Klayton Eckles regarding the eight bids
received for the proposed Furlong area
improvements and a recommended schedule for
the project.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the bid
security submitted by the highest five bidders
be released.
Councilmember Smith moved adoption of
Resolution No. 91-15, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
BIDS, ORDERING PREPARATION OF ASSESSMENT ROLL
AND CALLING FOR AN ASSESSMENT HEARING ON
PROPOSED SEWER, STORM SEWER, WATER, AND
APPURTENANCES TO SERVE FURLONG ADDITION AND
ADJACENT AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 86, PROJECT
NO. 4,)" and authorization to release the five
percent bid security submitted by the highest
Page No. 3021
April 2, 1991
five bidders.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
PARK CONSULTANT FEES Council acknowledged a memo from the City
Administrator regarding the Barton-Aschman
contract for Mendakota Park design and design
fee billings exceeding the contract.
Mr. Barry Warner was present representing
Barton-Aschman. He explained that the 200
hours reported over the threshold were needed
to complete the project, that they were actual
hours needed to prepare the plans and respond
to City requests. He stated that the bidding
climate for the project was tremendous - 50
plans were requested by bidders and 12 bids
were received as opposed to five bids for the
Sibley project. Another comparison between
the two projects is that the number of bidding
items on Sibley was 48 as compared to 100 for
Mendakota, 77 of which his firm was
responsible for. He stated that Barton
Aschman is not requesting that the City
respond to the entire fee but would like to
reach a compromise fair to both parties.
Mayo� Mertensotto stated that Council places
caps on contracts because Council needs
control over the money being spent. He
further stated that if Barton Aschman knew
they were exceeding the cap they should have
informed Council.
Mr. Warner stated that he should have been
before Council when the initial request was
made to modify the contract, because he could
have told Council it would be difficult to
meet the cap. He e�cplained that there were a
number of changes in the project and near the
end of the project the changes continued. He
explained that Barton Aschman had a very rigid
time frame established for them and had no
time to come back if the bids were to be in
and awarded on time.
Councilmember Blesener stated that when the
cap was discussed and placed on the contract,
Council stated that Barton Aschman would be
allowed to come back to discuss the matter but
never really gave them that opportunity. She
expressed some sympathy with them, although
she agreed that the amount Barton Aschman is
Ayes: 2
Nays: 2
Blesener
Smith
Mertensotto
Koch
Page No. 3022
April 2, 1991
asking is not appropriate. She agreed with
the staff approach of comparing the Mendakota
and Sibley projects as an appropriate method
of arriving at an amount.
Mayor Mertensotto asked whether Mr. Warner is
willing to accept the staff recommendation of
$32,073.58 (as compares to the $30,000
contract cap). Mr. Warner stated that he
feels this is less than fair compensation and
that he was hoping to negotiate something
closer to $35,000, which would mean that the
firm would still be absorbing a significant
portion of the compensated hours.
Councilmember Koch stated that she has a
difficult time understanding how Barton
Aschman could go so much over and where the
costs were incurred. Mr. Warner responded
that changes made by the City on a regular
basis added about $3,000, and that the
approximately 200 hours needed to complete the
plans and specifications were actual hours.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that there were 53
hours of questionable civil engineering time
for utilities and utility cost estimates. He
pointed out that there were tremendous hours
logg�d and Council must determine
reasonableness. � '
Councilmember Blesener stated that there is
some fault on both sides. Barton Aschman did
not keep the City informed on where the costs
were going, but Council gave them a very tight
schedule. She stated that she would be
willing to agree to 9� of the contract, which
would result in $3,392 over the cap. She felt
that 9� is reasonable compensation.
Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize
payment at the rate of 9� on the Barton
Aschman construction base of $388,300.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Motion failed.
Councilmember Koch asked whether Mr. Warner
had some knowledge that�the cap was being
exceeded.
ti
Page No. 3023
April 2, 1991
Mr. Warner responded that there were changes
encountered near the end of the contract and
he notified Public Works Director Danielson
that he felt he would be just over $30,000.
After that the firm worked every weekend and
evening in order to get the plans ready for
the bidding deadline.
Administrator Lawell stated that the letter
from Barton Aschman to Mr. Danielson dated
February 11th indicated �hat they would be
slightly over $30,000 and the plans were
delivered on February 13th. He stated that he
did not know how that significant amount of
fee could be generated in two days.
Mr. Warner responded that the firm runs on
two-week time sheets and that he should have
gone back on individual time sheets and
recorded them for the letter. He also stated
that there were bid alternates which have not
been accepted yet, including the tennis area
and grading.
Councilmember Koch moved to authorize payment
of $32,500 to Barton Aschman Associates for
the Mendakota Park Project..
Mayor Mertensotto seconded the motion.
Ayes: 2 Koch
Mertensotto
Nays: 2 Blesener
Smith
Motion failed.
Councilmember Blesener moved to authorize
payment of $34,000 to Barton Aschman
Associates for the Mendakota Park Project.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
COUNCIL CHAMBERS Council acknowledged a memo from the
MICROPHONE Administrative�Assistant regarding the
available types and prices of wireless and
handheld microphones for use in the Council
Chambers.
It was the consensus that the equipment tested
at this evening's meeting is not desirable and
that staff should continue to explore options.
Page No. 3024
April 2, 1991
ARBOR DAY Councilmember Smith moved that April
be proclaimed Arbor Day and that the
May, 1991 be proclaimed Arbor Month.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
26, 1991
month of
motion.
GOAL SETTING Council acknowledged a memo from the City
Administrator regarding the Goal Setting
workshop scheduled to be held at 6:30 on April
3rd. �
COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Blesener asked about the status
of the filling on the lot at the corner of
James Road and James Court. She also
expressed concern that cars are being parked
on the pedway along Lexington, adjacent to the
auto repair shop. She suggested that curbing
or pylons should be installed to alleviate the
problem.
Public Works Director Danielson stated that
the repair shop is under new ownership and
that he will contact the owner.
Mayor Mertensotto informed the Council of his
desire to conduct biweekly program on cable
television, between Council meetings, to
info�m the residents of Council action taken
at the last meeting and items to be discussed
at the next scheduled meeting.
ADJOURN There being no further business to
the Council, Councilmember Blesener
the meeting be adjourned.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
come before
moved that
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 11:30 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
�
0
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
April 2, 1991
Asphalt License
Lino Lakes Blacktop, Inc.
Excavating Licenses
Kuehn Excavating
Maplewood Mechanical, Inc.
General Licenses
Carlson Automatic Fire Protection Co.
Conroy Brothers Company
Homecare, Inc.
Hunter Construction
Olsen Fire Protection, Inc.
Schomaker Construction
Heating License
Thermex Corporation
S ign License � � � •• � - - � � • � - � � � - � �
Sign Services, Inc.
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Board of Review
Held Tuesday, April 9, 1991
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the annual Board of Review
meeting of the City`Council of the City of Mendota Heights was held
at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota
Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meet to order at 7: 31 0' clock P.M. for
the purpose of the annual board of review. The following members
were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, Koch and
Smith. Councilmember Cummins was excused.
BOARD OF REVIEW
Mayor Mertensotto acknowledged letters received
from Jed A. Lund (for Cray Research, Inc.), Sheldon
Russell, Richard A. Grayson and Michael and Deeanne
Reynolds. He then turned the meeting over to.Bill
Peterson, Dakota County Assessor's Office
Residential Manager.
Mr. Peterson informed the audience that the purpose
of the meeting is to review the 1991 residential
market values for taxes payable in 1992. He
explained that after the general discussion,
representatives of the Assessor's Office would meet
individually with everyone present, and he asked
that everyone in attendance sign their names on an
attendance list.
Mr. Peterson stated that the Assessor's Office
conducted County-wide open book meetings and that
several Mendota Heights residents were present for
the open book meeting held in South St. Paul in
March.
Mr. Peterson briefly explained that the County uses
a computer assisted mass appraisal system to
calculate residential valuations. Mr. Peterson
stated that the valuations of homes in Mendota
Heights did not change a great deal from the
previous year. He explained that the County used
this system last year and that there have been some
minor modifications made to the system. He
explained that the mechanics of the system in
determining valuations has not changed.
In response to a question from the audience, Mr.
Peterson stated that the Assessor's Office does
physical reevaluations of homes within Dakota
County once every four years.
After responding to other general questions, Mr.
Peterson informed the audience that the Assessor's
staff would now meet individually with the property
owners in attendance.
r_�.�t.��r:�`�
There being no further business to come before the
Board of Review, Councilmember Blesener moved that
the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PARRS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
APRIL 9, 1991
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation
Commission was held on Tuesday, April 9, 1991, in the City Hall
Expansion Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chair John Huber called the
meeting to order at 7:15 o'clock P.M. The following members were
present: Huber, Hunter, Damberg and Spicer. Commissioners
Kleinglass, Lundeen and Katz were excused. Staff inembers present
were Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander and Administrative
Assistant Kevin Batchelder.
APPROVAL OF MINITTES
Commissioner Hunter moved approval of the March 12,
1991 Minutes.
Commissioner Spicer seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
MAYFIELD HEIGHTS TRAIL
Chair John Huber introduced Commission and staff to
the Mayfield Heights residents in attendance for
this agenda item. Chair Huber summarized the
request for a trail by the neighborhood and the
work that the engineering staff has completed this
winter. Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander
explained the Feasibility Report to the audience.
He explained that the cost for connecting Mayfield
Heights trail had been estimated by the engineer's
department at between $14,000 to $24,000. Mr.
Kullander explained that the price range
differential was based on easement acquisitions
being friendly or the City pursuing condemnation.
He stated that Public Works Director Jim Danielson
had contacted the two homeowners, the Hoffman's and
the Nonnemacher's and that their response had been
that they were not interested in providing the City
with a trail easement through their property. Mr.
Kullander explained that City engineering staff had
examined other options to link Mayfield Heights
Lane with the City trail system. He explained
these other options would require more than two
easements as they would cross� numerous properties
in order to get either to James Court, James Road
April 9, 1991
Page 2
or pouglas Road.
Chair Huber opened the floor to the audience to
speak for or against the trail.
Ms. Judith Phillips, 1670 Mayfield Heights Lane
stated that there are approximately 12 to 14 homes
in the Mayfield Heights �eighborhood. She
estimated that there were 44 people including young
children in this neighborhood. She stated that
their only access to the City and the City trail
system is by way of Highway 13. Ms. Phillips
stated that in the old days the Nonnemacher
property was a vacant lot that people would cross
to get to Douglas Lane. She stated this was then
built upon and landscaped and for the most part the
neighbors are not cutting through there to get to
Douglas Road anymore. Ms. Phillips stated that the
neighborhood is very concerned about the heavy
traffic on Highway 13, the condominiums, the bar,
and the liquor store which their children have to
go by when traveling on Highway 13. She stated
that there are a lot of heavy trucks using the
gravel pit and that basically the neighborhood is
concerned about access for the children to parks
and to school bus stops. Ms. Phillips stated that
a dog was hit and killed last week-on Highway 13.
She stated that she realizes the Highway widening
may help the situation but their concern is to
prevent a child fatality occurring in this area.
Mr. Tom Nonnemacher, Douglas Road, spoke against
having the trail through his yard. He stated that
he used to live in Mayfield Heights and that there
was no trail on this lot when they moved in. He
stated that the vacant lot sat for years and that
none of the neighbors pursued buying it for a trail
at that time. He stated that he saw no upside or
positive reason to allow a trail to invade the
privacy of his home.
Parks Project Manager Kullander stated that there
is a thirty foot underground storm utility easement
between the Nonnemacher and Hoffman property. He
stated that the City has the right to dig it up, to
restore it or repair it, however that is the only
access that the City has at this utility easement.
Mr. Kullander stated that in order to have a trail
easement through this area the City would have to
purchase this right from the liomeowners.
i
April 9, 1991
Page 3
Commissioner Damberg inquired if the apartment
building adjacent to the Mayfield Heights
neighborhood was in Lilydale. Mr. Kullander
responded that, yes it was, and that it would be
difficult to take the trail through the Lilydale
property as there would be a lot of mature trees
that would need to be taken down and a joint powers
agreement between the two Cities would be necessary
as well as the condominium association agreement.
Mr. Stu Steinman stated that he lives across the
road from Mr. Nonnemacher. He stated before Mr.
Nonnemacher developed that property there had been
a"for sale" sign on it and that it had been an
unsightly swamp. He stated that very little foot
traffic came through this empty lot because of
steep slopes. Mr. Steinman stated that the
Nonnemacher's have improved the lot with a
beautiful house and fixed what was blight on the
neighborhood. Mr. Steinman stated that he did not
want this trail and felt that it was dangerous for
him to back out of his driveway with bicycle and
foot traffic coming from this trail onto Douglas
Road. He stated that there will be motorcycles,
bicycles and skate boards using this trail and he
did not want this in his neighborhood. Mr. Hoffman
stated th�t� there� have .been incidents of
motorcycles going through the woods on his lot.
Ms. Phillips stated that if the cost was too
expensive it was not necessary to have the trail be
bituminous. Mr. Kullander responded that a
bituminous trail is less costly for maintenance and
that the City liability requirements emphasize
maintainable hard surface for a trail.
Mr. Hoffman stated that he appreciates Mayfield
Heights concern, however, he felt that this was not
a reasonable solution to put a path through someone
else's yard. He stated that he chose to live in
the suburbs because of a desire for privacy.
Ms. Andrea Larson, 1666 Mayfield Heights Road
stated that the City of Mendota Heights should be
concerned about the well being of the value of
Mendota Heights as a community and the value of its
property. She stated that the only draw back to
the location of Mayfield Heights Road is a lack of
access to the rest of the community. She stated
that she cannot access any of the new parks with
her baby stroller. She stated that she currently
5
April 9, 1991
Page 4
gets to the City park trails by taking Highway 13
and Lexington Avenue. She stated that the traffic
on Highway 13 and the hill up Lexington Avenue are
almost too rigorous for her to use the City parks.
She stated that Mayfield Heights needs to be
connected with the rest of the City.
Mr. Nonnemacher stated that he,,could understand why
the Mayfield Heights wanted the trail and that it
would increase their property`values, however, he
is concerned that a trail through his property
would decrease his property value.
Ms. Phillips stated that there needs to be a way
for children to access the parks. She stated that
their neighborhood is paying for the City Park
Referendum just like every other neighborhood,
however it is isolated from the facilities. She
stated that there was perhaps a misunderstanding of
property buyers in her neighborhood that there was
an easement through this property that would
provide a trail and a link for the children in the
neighborhood.
Commissioner Damberg inquired about the trail link
from Mendota School to Walsh Lane. Parks Project
Manager Kullander responded that this easement was
required. of the developer at the time of
subdivision platting. A Mayfield Heights resident
stated that her relative lived at 1880 Walsh Lane
and that trail next to their property was no
problem with the children and the bicycles.
Chair Huber inquired whether the City had ever
suggested or advertised that a City trail would be
placed on this Mayfield Heights utility easement.
Mr. Kullander explained that the storm sewer
construction was done in 1968 and at that time the
area that was dug up was cleared of vegetation. He
stated that since that time it has been allowed to
grow back to a natural vegetation and that the only
person that would be concerned about an easement in
this area is the property owner. There followed a
discussion of the empty lot and its history as a
vacant lot in this neighborhood.
Ms. Phillips inquired if there were other possible
routes that the engineering staff could pursue.
Mr. Kullander responded that this scenario would be
the easiest situation to bring�the Mayfield Heights
trail up to Douglas Road. He stated there are only
4
April 9, 1991
Page 5
two easements to acquire in this area and that it
is a short section of trail. Commissioner Spicer
suggested that the engineering staff check other
areas to link this neighborhood and perhaps the
Mayfield Heights neighborhood could talk to these
neighbors to see if they are willing to have a
trail easement through their property. Chair Huber
stated that he felt it was more appropriate that
the City approach property owners about trail
easements. �
Mr. Nonnemacher stated that they chose this lot as
an area they wanted to live in and that they had
the foresight to buy a lot and a half to provide a
private yard for their house and now they
potentially will lose it. He stated that a trail
through his yard would open the area up to all
residents in the Lilydale condominiums and
apartments and that he is opposed to this extra
traffic coming through his property.
Chair Huber asked the Parks Commissioners to give
the neighborhood a direction or some indication of
a direction in which to pursue. Commissioner
Spicer stated that he has sympathy with the
Mayfield Heights residents and that is why they had
asked the� City engineering staff to find a
reasonable way to link a trail system to their
neighborhood. He stated, however, there may not be
an alternative that is reasonable. Commissioner
Spicer stated that he would not recommend a
condemnation proceeding in order to acquire a trail
to Douglas Road from Mayfield Heights Road. He
stated that the best option would be to have staff
pursue other easement possibilities. Commissioner
Hunter agreed: Commissioner Hunter stated that
there may be other property owners who would want
the easement fee and not mind having a bike trail
through their property. He stated that he is also
reluctant to force a condemnation. Commissioner
Damberg stated that she thinks the best option is
to explore other routes for possible easements and
that she would recommend the engineering staff do
so.
Chair Huber inquired that, if there were not any
other friendly easements available what would the
Parks and Recreation Commission like to tell the
people of the Mayfield Heights neighborhood. He
stated that he would be disinclined to force a
trail to provide a link up Mayfield Heights
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
J
April 9, 1991
Page 6
neighborhood through a condemnation proceeding.
Commissioner Damberg stated that she would like
staff to explore other options and at this time she
did not wish to go further than that.
Chair Huber again stated that he is reluctant to
force a trail on property owners who do not want
it. He said that it would be a,ppropriate to search
for willing neighbors who � would allow this
easement. Chair Huber stated that the Park
Referendum is doing a lot of good things throughout
the City, however, there are neighborhoods who do
not have trails or neighborhood parks close by. He
stated that certain neighborhoods are handicapped
in this regard but that he believes the City has
done a more than adequate job in supplying parks
the City.
Commissioner Spicer moved to recommend that the
engineering staff contact landowners who have
reasonable access and are willing to provide
friendly easements.
Commissioner Damberg seconded the motion.
Parks Project Manager stated that the engineering
staff could pursue this right away and have
something in time for the May Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting. Mr. Kullander explained the
new alignment of Victoria Road and the widened
shoulders on Highway 13. He stated that the new
Victoria will have a trail path all the way to
Highway 13 that would connect with the current
trail that ends at Celia Road. The Parks and
Recreation Commission was of a consensus that any
platting of vacant lots in this area should give
serious consideration to trail easements as part of
any subdivision.
MENDAROTA TENNIS BID ALTERNATE
Parks Project Manager Kullander explained the
proposal from the Mendakota Estates neighborhood.
He stated that the neighbors are willing to pay the
City's cost of $23,900 to construct a new tennis
court, however, they could not afford the
additional $30,000 cost to buy the lot in order to
dedicate it to the City as proposed earlier in
U
April 9, 1991
Page 7
discussions with the Parks and Recreation
Commission. He stated that Keith Heaver had
presented an alternative to the City that would not
dedicate the lot, but would subdivide a twenty foot
(20') strip off of it leaving room to place the
tennis court between the newly created lot and the
high power line easement. He stated that this
location had been staked with the blue ribbons out
at the site and that maps had been provided showing
this location in tonight's memo. Administrative
Assistant Batchelder stated that the biggest
constraint in putting a tennis court in this
location would be the timing, the legal
arrangements necessary to work out construction
easements, the subdivision of the lot and the
agreement of the neighborhood to pay for the cost
of constructing the tennis court.
Commission Spicer moved that this item be continued
to the next the meeting in order to give staff time
to contact Mr. Heaver for a formal reply in writing
of the neighborhood's intention.
Commissioner Hunter seconded the motion and stated
that he is in favor of constructing the tennis
court if possible.
AYES: 4 • '
NAYS: 0
PLAY EQIIIPMENT PROPOSALS
Parks Project Manager Kullander stated that the
City had received three responses from play
equipment vendors to provide the play equipment as
requested by the City in Mendakota Park. He stated
that these vendors are the Earl Anderson Company,
Value Recreation Company and Flannagan Sales
Company. He stated that each vendor is present
tonight to give a presentation on their company�s
equipment.
Mr. Mike Dorsey of Earl Anderson Company presented
his proposed play equipment bid. The bid included
handicapped access, decks, swings, toddler sand
area, rubberized safe decking and a pea gravel
surface. Mr. Dorsey explained the amenities that
would come with the play equipment he is proposing.
Mr. Dorsey also explained the materials that would
be used to construct the play� equipment including
showing the Commission construction samples. The
�
April 9, 1991
Page 8
Commission spent some time discussing amenities,
the proposed rubberized safe decking and the
quality of the construction materials. Mr. Dorsey
explained that there is a ten year warranty on his
equipment that his company is located in
Bloomington and that all of the parks materials are
available locally. .
Mr. Chris Haugen of Value Recr.eation presented his
proposal of Play World Systems~Play Equipment. Mr.
Haugen explained the play value, the aesthetics,
the durability, the safety and the handicapped
inclusiveness of his system. He stated that Play
World Systems has been in the business for 35
years. Mr. Haugen stated that his company has
constructed 25 playgrounds in the Twin Cities area.
He stated that they have a ten year warranty and
that parts are available from the manufacturing
plant in Pennsylvania. Mr. Haugen stated that
there is a school district site in Anoka where
Commissioners could visit a Play inTorld System
structure.
Mr. Brian Flannagan of Flannagan Sales Company
presented his proposed play ground equipment that
is Iron Mountain Forge. He stated that Iron
Mountain Forge has been inl the business•of'play•
equipment for 13 years. Kid Builders is the design
system that they are using for their proposal. Mr.
Flannagan stated that he had used a larger play
ground site than had been specified by the Parks
Department and that the border had been expanded to
incorporate more equipment. Mr. Flannagan stated
that 1/3 of their,play equipment is handicapped
accessible and described the amenities that would
come with the play equipment. Mr. Flannagan stated
that Adams Elementary in Coon Rapids has a site
with this type of equipment that could be visited.
The Commissioners thanked each vendor for their
presentation on play equipment.
The Commission discussed the play equipment they
had reviewed with the vendors. The Commission
directed staff to.review the proposals and come
back with a report at the May Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting. The Commission specifically
wanted staff to count the active stations, compare
the highlights and features of the play equipment,
discuss the quality differences of the systems and
i • y!
VERBAL UPDATES
April 9, 1991
Page 9
have some addresses forwarded to the Parks
Commission so they could visit the sites where
these play fields are in place.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder provided verbal
updates to the Parks and Recreation Commission on
the following items: �
a. Correspondence from ISD #197 Access Project
b. "Mendakota Park"
c. Bid Award for Construction of Mendakota Park
d. St. Thomas Academy - Tennis Court
e. Trail Maps
f. Adopt-A- Park
g. Park Ordinance
h. Park Inventory
i. Sibley Maintenance Budget
Parks Project Manager Kullander provided verbal
updates on the Mendakota Park construction. Mr.
Kullander stated that the pay phone has been
installed at the Sibley Park site. Mr. Kullander
stated that washout areas and reseeding areas would
be fixed �at Sibley, Victoria Highlands and
Hagstrom-King Parks. He stated that signs for the
new parks have been ordered. Mr. Kullander stated
that the tennis nets have been put up, the tennis
courts, and the basketball courts have been swept,
some of the trails have been swept and the parks
crews are busy painting the inside of the warming
houses.
Commissioner Spicer stated that the Mendota School
play fields are used extensively and that the City
should consider shared expenses for providing field
furniture for this site including benches,
backstops and other amenities. Mr. Kullander
stated that Terry Blum, Parks Leadperson, had
recommended that Friendly Hills Park not be played
on until June. Mr. Kullander stated that he had
complaints regarding the Wentworth tennis court and
the Hagstrom-King basketball court. Mr. Kullander
stated that the School District had informed' the
City that there was an April 15th deadline for
requests to schedule fields at Sibley Park.
ADJOURNMENT
April 9, 1991
Page 10
There being no fur.ther business the Parks and
Recreation Commission adjourned at 10:30 o'clock
P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
�� • }
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TREASURER�S BEPORT� MARCB, 1991
BALANGE COLLATERAL
DAROTA COIINTY STATE BANR
Checking Account �.85%
Savings Accaunt 4.75�
C.D. Rep. 5.850
Callateral. - Bor�ds
Gav't. Guar.
CHEROREE STATE BANK
$ 81,489.13
522.98
150,000.00
$ 232,012.11
$1,092,581.00
$ 1QQ,OOO.OQ
C.D. due 5f23/91 @ 6.40� $
Savings Cert. 8/28/91
@ 6.0� $
$
Collateral - Bonds $
Gov't. Guar. $
U.S. Treasury 8 5/8�
5-15-93 Nates $
FNB Acceptance
$1,000,000 4/12/91 6.73% $
GNMA Mtg. Pool 9� $
$1,292,581.QQ
350,000.00
3,3.952.59
363,952.59
:i� ��� ��
ii Iii ii
� 9oo,00a.oa
498,6i1.88
993,583.33
276,158.49
Value 3-29-91 (est.)
U.S. Treasury Maney Mkt 1,514,270.46 (2,013,000.00}
Gav't. Securities Fund 1,200,000.00 �Z,so�,aaa.40)
TC}TAL FIINDS AVAILABLE: $5,Q78,648.86
Funds Available 12/31j90 $6,192,720,44
3/31/90 $4,189,827.00
Rates Monev Market
Feb. 28 Bank 5.85�
Fid 6.28%
Escrow Funds {American National Bank} 2-28-91
Gity Hall Buildings $ 25,654.21
Railroad Crossing $1.62.7.29.90
TOTAL $187,785.11
LES:kkb .
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 11, 2991
TO: Mayor, City Cauncil and City Administta���
FROMz Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Band Refinancing far Lexington iieights Apartments
HISTi3RY
in 2983, the City approved the is�uance of Multi-Family
Housing Revenue Bonds in the amount of $11,000,000 to finance the
Lexington Heights Apartment project. At thi.s time, the Bonds were
issued as variable rate bonds. During 1990, the developer planned
to reissue the bonds a a fixed rate, and the City Council approved
the change. Due to money market canditians at the time, the bonds
were issued as temporary bonds, '
nzscIIss=ort
At this time, the developer is ready tQ issue the permanent '
bond for the praject. This action requires the City t�o approve a
new loan agreement and Trust Indenture. These documents have been
prepared by IIolmes and Graven Attorneys for the developer, and
reviewed by the City At�torney, Winthrop and Weinstine.
The Bonds wi11 be issued as Series A and Series B which
requires adoption o� two separate resolutions.
As previousZy �tipulated by the Council, an issuance fee for
the permanent financing was paid ta the City by the developer when
the temporary bonds were issued in 199Q.
ACTIt7N REQIIIRED
Adopt Resolutian No. 91- and Resolutian No, 91-
approving loan agreement and Trust Indenture and authorizing the
new issues of permanent financing �or the Lexington Heights
Apartment project.
/`
s: �
RESOLUTION
of the
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA (THE "ISSUER.")
AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF
THE ISSUER'S MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE
REFUNDING BONDS LEXINGTON HEIGHTS APARTMENTS
PROJECT) SERIES 1991A (THE "BONDS"), WHICH BONDS
AND THE INTEREST AND ANY PREMIUM THEREON SHALL
BE PAYABLE SOLELY FROM REVENUES PLEDGED
THERETO; APPROVING THE FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF A TR.UST INDENTURE,
A LOAN AGREEMENT, A REMARBETING AGREEMENT, A
REGULATORY AGREEMENT AND A BOND PURCHASE
AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE USE OF A PRELIMINARY
OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT;
APPROVING THE FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF THE BOND5; AND
PROVIDING FOft THE SECURITY, R,IGHTS AND REMEDIES
OF THE OWNEftS OF SAID BONDS
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota (the "Issuer") is a municipal
corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Constitution and laws �of the 5tate of Minnesota,
particularly Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act"), the Issuer is
authorized to carry out the public purposes described therein and contemplated
thereby by issuing its revenue bonds to finance the cost of the acquisition,
construetion, improving and equipping of multifamily housing developments to be
located within its corporate boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer has previously issued its $11,000,000 Housing Mortgage
ftevenue Bonds (Lexington Heights Apartments Project), dated December 1, 1983 (the
"Prior Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, the Issuer loaned the proceeds of the Prior Bonds to Lexington
Heights Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership (the
"Company") for the purpose of acquiring, constructing and equipping a 225-unit
multifamily housing development within the corporate boundaries of the Issuer (the
"Project'�; and
WHEREAS, the Company has requested the Issuer to issue its Multifamily
Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds (Lexington Heights Apartments Project) Series
1991A in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ (the "Bonds")
to provide for the funding of a loan (the "Loan") to the Company for the purpose of
refunding of the Prior Bonds on or about June 1, 1991; and
'� u
WHEREAS, the Loan will be made pursuant to the terms of a Loan Agreement
dated as of April 1, 1991 (the "Loan Agreement") between the Issuer and the Company;
and
WHEREAS, the Issuer proposes to finance the refunding and redemption of the
Prior Bonds under the Act by the issuanee of the Bonds of the Issuer under this
resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds will be issued under a Trust Indenture dated as of April 1,
1991 (the "Indenture") between the Issuer and the trustee named therein (the
"Trustee"), and are to be secured by a letter of credit issued by The Sumitomo Bank,
Limited, aeting through its Chicago Branch (the "Bank"), or any substitute letter of
credit delivered in accordance with the terms of the Indenture (collectively, the
"Letter of Credit"), and a pledge and assignment of certain other revenues, all in
accordance with the terms of the Indenture, and said Bonds and the interest on said
Bonds shall be payable solely from the revenues pledged therefor and the Bonds shall
not constitute a debt of the Issuer within the meaning of any constitutional or
statutory li'mitation or constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Issuer or a
charge against its general credit or taxing powers and shall not constitute a charge,
lien, or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Issuer other than the
Issuer's interest in the Loan Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer, on the date hereof, has previously held a public hearing
regarding the issuance of the Bonds for which hearing notice was published in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City on February 16� 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Issuer acknowledges, finds, determines, and declares that the refunding
of the Prior Bonds, the proceeds of which were used to construct the Project, furthers
the�purposes of the Act.
2. For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby authorized the issuanee,
sale and delivery of the Bonds in a prineipal amount not to exceed $ .
The Bonds shall be numbered, shall be dated, shall bear interest, shall mature, shall be
subject to redemption prior to maturity, shall be in such form, and shall have such
other details and provisions as are prescribed in the Indenture in the form approved by
the Issuer in this resolution.
3. The Bonds shall be special obligations of the Issuer payable solely from the
revenues provided pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Letter of Credit, and other
funds pledged pursuant to the Indenture. The City Council of the Issuer hereby
authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Administrator of the Issuer (together,
the "Officials") to execute and deliver the Indenture and to deliver to said Trustee the
Indenture, and hereby authorizes and directs the execution of the Bonds in accordance
with the Indenture, and hereby provides that the terms and conditions, covenants,
rights, obligations, duties and agreements of the bondowners, the Issuer and the
Trustee shall be as set forth in the Indenture.
All of the provisions of the Indenture, when executed as suthorized herein, shall
be in full force and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The
2
.r
Indenture shall be substantially in the iarm an file with the Lssuer, with such necessary
and appropriate variatians, omissions and insertians as do not materially change the
s�bstance thereaf, or as the City Aciministrator, in his diseretion, shall determine, and
the execution thereof by the City Administrator shall be conclusive evidence of such
determinatian. .
4. The Officials are hereby authorized and direeted tQ execute and deliver the
Loan Agreernent, the Regulatory Agreement dated as of April 1, 1991, among the
Issuer, Campany and Trustee (the "Regulatory Agreement"), the Bond Purchase
Agreement by and among Piper, �'affray & Hopwaod Incorporated (the 'TUnderwriter"),
the Company and the Issuer (the "Bond Purchase Agxeement") and the Remarl�eting
Agreement hy and amang the Issuer, the Underwriter, the Company and the Trustee
(the "Remarketing Agreement"). All of the provisions of the Loan Agreement, the
Regulatory Agreement, the Bond Purehase Agreement and the Remarketing
Agreement, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be in full force
and effeet from the date of exeeutian and delivery thereof. The Laan Agreement, the
Regulatory Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Remarketing
Agreement shall be substantially in the farms on file with the Issuer, with such
omissions and insertions as do not materielly change the substanee thereof, ar as the
City Adrninistrator, in his discretion, shall deterrnine, and the execution thereof by the
City Administrator shail be canclusive evidence of such determinatian.
5. The proceeds af the Bands shall be disbursed pursuani tg the Indenture and
the Loan Agreement.
6. The Trustee is hereby appainted as Faying Agent and Bond Registrar for
the Bonds.
7. The Officials are hereby authorized ta execute and deliver, on behalf of
the Issuer, such other docunnents as are necessary ar appropriate in canneetion with
the issuanee, sale, and delivery of the Bands, including an arbitrage certificate, and all
other daeuments and eertificates as shall be necessary and appropriate i.n eonneetion
wiih the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bands.
8. The Issuer hes not partieipated in the preparation of the Preliminary
Official Statement relating to the Bonds (the "Preliminary Official Statement") and
has made na independent investigation with respeet to the information contained
therein, ineluding any appendices thereto, and the Lssuer assumes no responsibility for
the sufficiency, aeeuraey ar eampleteness of saeh infarmation. Subject to the
foregoing, the issuer hereby consents to the distributian aP the Preliminary Official
Statem�nt and, following eompletian thereoi, an Official Statement by the
Underwriter in conneetion with the sale of the Bonds.
9. AII eovenants, stipulatians, obligations and agreements of the �,ssuer
contained in this resolution and the afarementioned documents shall be deemed to be
the cavenants, stipulatians, abligatians and agreernents of the Issuer to the full extent
authorized or perrnitted by law, and all such covenants, stipulations, obligations and
agreements shall be binding upon the Lssuer, Exeept as otherwise pravided in this
resalution, a11 rights, pawers and privileges canferred and duties and liabilities imposed
upon the Issuer by the provisions of this resolution or the aforernentianed documents
shall be exereised or perfarmed by sueh offieers, baard, body or ageney thereaf as may
be required or authorized by law ta exereise such powers and to perform such duties.
3
No covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement herein contained or contained
in the aforementioned documents shall be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation,
obligation or agreement of any member of the City Council of the Issuer, or any
officer, agent or employee of the Issuer in that person's individual capacity, and
neither the City Couneil of the Issuer nor any officer or employee executing the Bonds
shall be liable personally on the Bonds or be subject to any personal liability or
accountability by reason of the issuance thereof.
No provision, covenant or agreement contained in the aforementioned
documents, the Bonds or in any other document related to the Bonds, and no obligation
therein or herein imposed upon the Issuer or the breach thereof, shall constitute or
give rise to any pecuniary liability of the Issuer or any charge upon its general eredit
or taxin� powers. In making the agreements, provisions, covenants and representations
set forth in such documents, the Issuer has not obligated itself to pay or remit any
funds or revenues, other than funds and revenues derived from the Loan Agreement
which are to be applied to the payment of the Bonds, as provided therein and in the
Indenture.
10. Except as herein otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this resolution or
in the aforementioned documents expressed or implied, is intended or shall be
eonstrued to confer upon any person or firm or corporation, other than the Issuer or
any owner of the Bonds issued under the provisions of this resolution, any right,
remedy or claim, legal or equitable, under and by reason of this resolution or any
provision hereof, this resolution, the aforementioned documents and all of their
provisions being intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the
Issuer and any owners from time to time of the Bonds issued under the provisions of
this resolution.
11. In case any one or more of the provisions of this resolution, or of the _
aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds issued hereurider shall for any reason be
held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other
provision of this resolution, or of the aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds, but
this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds shall be construed and
endorsed as if sueh illegal or invalid provision had not been contained therein.
12. The Bonds, when executed and delivered, shall contain a recital that they
are issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conclusive evidence of the
validity of the Bonds and the regvlarity of the issuance thereof, and that all acts,
conditions and things required by the laws of the State of Minnesota relating to the
adoption of this resolution, to the issuance of the Bonds and to the exeeution of the
aforementioned documents to happen, exist and be performed precedent to and in the
enactment of this resolution, and precedent to issuance of the Bonds and precedent to
the execution of the aforementioned documents have happened, exist and have been
performed as so required by law.
13. The officers of the Issuer, attorneys and other agents or employees of the
Issuer are hereby authorized to do all acts and things required of them by or in
conneetion with this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds for the
full, punetual and complete performance of all the terms, covenants and agreements
contained in the Bonds, the aforementioned documents and this resolution. In the
event that for any reason the Mayor of the Issuer is unable to carry out the execution
of any of the documents or other acts provided herein, any other member of the City
4
Council of the Issuer shall be authorized to act in his capacity and undertake such
execution or acts on behalf of the Issuer with full force and effect, which executions
or acts shall be valid and binding on the Issuer. If for any reason the City
Administrator of the Issuer is unable to execute and deliver the documents referred to
in this Resolution, such documents may be executed by a member of the City Council
or the City Clerk with the same force and effect as if such documents were executed
and delivered by the City Administrator of the Issuer.
Adopted: , 1991
Attest:
City Clerk
�
5
Mayor
RESOLUTION
af the
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE GITY 4F
MENDOTA HEIG�ITS, MINNESQTA (THE "ISSi7ER"}
AUTHOR.IZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF
THE ISSUEA'S MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE
R.EFUNDING BONDS LEXINGTCIN HEIGHTS � APARTMENTS
PROJECT) SERIES 1991B (THE "BONDS"), WHICH BONDS
AND TFIE INTEREST ANI3 ANY PR.EMIUM THEREON SHALL
BE PAYABLE SOLELY FR.4M REVENUES PLEDGED
T�iERETO; APFR.4VING THE FCIR.iVI QF AND AUTi�ORIZING
THE EXECUTION AND DELTVERY OF A TRUST INDENTURE,
A LOAN AGREEMENT, A REMARKETING AGR.EEMENT, A
REGULATORY AGHEEMENT AND A BOND PURCHASE
AGREEMENT; APPROVING THE USE ,OF A PRELIMINAR.Y
OFFiCIAL STATEMENT AND AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT;
APPAOVING THE FORM OF AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION AND DELIVERY QF THE BC}NDS; AND
PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY, RIGHTS AND REMEDIES
4F THE OWNERS OF SAID BONDS
WFIEREAS, the City of Mendota Fleights, Minnesata (the "Issuer") is a municipal
corparatian and political subdivision af the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State af Minnesota,
particularly Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act'"), the Issuer is
authorized to carry aut the publie purposes deseribed therein and eonte�nplated
thereby by issuing its revenue bonds to finance the east of the aequisition,
eonstruetion, improving and equipping of multifamilp housing developments to be
Iocated within its eorporate boundaries; and
WFIEREAS, the Issuer has greviausly issued its $11,000,080 Housing Mortgage
Revenue Bonds (Lexingtan Heights Apartments Pro3ect), dated Deeember 1, 1983 (the
"prior Bonds"}; and
' WHEREAS, the Issuer loaned the proeeeds af the Prior Bonds to Lexingtan
Heights Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesata limited partnership (the
"Camgany"} far the gurpase af aequiring, construeting and equipging a 225-unit
multifamiiy housing develapment within the corporate boundaries of the Issuer (the
"Project"); and "
WHEREAS, the Company has requested the Issuer to issue ita Multifamily
Housing Revenue Refunding Bonds {Lexington �Ieights Apartments Project} Series
1991B in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $ (the "Bonds")
to provide for the funding of a loan (the "Loan°) to the Gompany for the purpose af
refunding of the Priar Bonds an or about �une 1, i991; and
1
WHEftEAS, the Loan will be made pursuant to the terms of a Loan Agreement
dated as of April 1, 1991 (the "Loan Agreement") between the Issuer and the Company;
and
WHER.EAS, the Issuer proposes to finance the refunding and redemption of the
Prior Bonds under the Act by the issuance of the Bonds of the Issuer under this
resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds will be issued under a Trust Indenture dated as of April 1,
1991 (the "Indenture") between the Issuer and the trustee named therein (the
"Trustee"), and are to be secured by a letter of credit issued by First Bank National
Association (the "Bank"), or any substitute letter of credit delivered in accordance
with the terms of the Indenture (collectively, the "Letter of Credit"), and a pledge
and assignment of certain other revenues, all in accordance with the terms of the
Indenture, and said Bonds and the interest on said Bonds shall be payable solely from
the revenues pledged therefor and the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the Issuer
within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation or eonstitute or give
rise to a pecuniary liability of the Issuer or a eharge against its general eredit or
taxing powers and shall not constitute a charge, lien, or encumbrance, legal or
equitable, upon any property of the Issuer other than the Issuer's interest in the Loan
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Issuer, on the date hereof, has previously held a public hearing
regarding the issuance of the Bonds for whieh hearing notice was published in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City onFebruary 16 , 1990.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Issuer acknowledges, finds, determines, and declares that the refunding
of the Prior Bonds, the proceeds of which were used to construct the Projeet, furthers
the purposes of the Act.
2. For the purposes set forth above, there is hereby authorized the issuance,
sale and delivery of the Bonds in a prineipal amount not to exceed $ .
The Bonds shall be numbered, shall be dated, shall bear interest, shall mature, shall be
subject to redemption prior to maturity, shall be in such form, and shall have such
other details and provisions as are prescribed in the Indenture in the form approved by
the Issuer in this resolution.
3. The Bonds shall be special obligations of the Issuer payable solely from the
revenues provided pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Letter of Credit, and other
funds pledged pursuant to the Indenture. The City Council of the Issuer hereby
authorizes and directs the Mayor and the City Administrator of the Issuer (together,
the "Officials") to execute and deliver the Indenture and to deliver to said Trustee the
Indenture, and hereby authorizes and directs the execution of the Bonds in accordance
with the Indenture, and hereby provides that the terms and conditions, covenants,
rights, obligations, duties and agreements of the bondowners, the Issuer and the
Trustee shall be as set forth in the Indenture.
All of the provisions of the Indenture, when executed as authorized herein, shall
be in full force and effeet from the date of execution �and delivery thereof. The
Indenture shall be substantially in the form on file with the Issuer, with such necessary
and appropriate variations, omissions and insertions as do not materially change the
substance thereof, or as the City Administrator, in his discretion, shall determine, and
the execution thereof by the City Administrator shall be conclusive evidenee of such
determination.
4. The Officials are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver the
Loan Agreement, the Regulatory Agreement dated as of April 1, 1991, among the
Issuer, Company and Trustee (the "Regulatory Agreement"), the Bond Purehase
Agreement by and among Piper, Jaffray d� Hopwood Incorporated (the "Underwriter"),
the Company and the Issuer (the "Bond Purchase Agreement") and the Remarketing
Agreement by and among the Issuer, the Underwriter, the Company and the Trustee
(the "Remarketing Agreement"). All of the provisions of the Loan Agreement, the
Regulatory Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Remarketing
Agreement, when executed and delivered as authorized herein, shall be in full force
and effect from the date of execution and delivery thereof. The Loan Agreement, the
Regulatory Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the R.emarketing
Agreement shall be substantially in the forms on file with the Issuer, with such
omissions and insertions as do not materially change the substance thereof, or as the
City Administrator, in his discretion, shall determine, and the execution thereof by the
City Administrator shall be conclusive evidence of such determination.
5. The proceeds of the Bonds shall be disbursed pursuant to the Indenture and
the Loan Agreement.
6. The Trustee is hereby appointed as Paying Agent and Bond Registrar for
the Bonds.
7. The Officials are hereby authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of
the Tssuer, such other documents as are neeessary or appropriate in connection with
the issuance, sale, and delivery of the Bonds, including an arbitrage eertif icate, and all
other documents and certificates as shall be necessary and appropriate in connection
with the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds.
8. The Issuer has not participated in the preparation of the Preliminary
Official Statement relating to the Bonds (the "Preliminary Official Statement") and
has made no independent investigation with respect to the information contained
therein, including any appendices thereto, and the issuer assumes no responsibility for
the sufficiency, aceuracy or completeness of such information. Subjeet to the
foregoing, the Issuer hereby consents to the distribution of the Preliminary Offieial
Statement and, following completion thereof, an Official Statement by the
Underwriter in connection with the sale of the Bonds.
9. All covenants, stipulations, obligations and agreements of the Issuer
contained in this resolution and the aforementioned documents shall be deemed to be
the covenants, stipulations, obligations and agreements of the Issuer to the full extent
authorized or permitted by law, and all such covenants, stipulations, obligations and
agreements shall be binding upon the Issuer. Except as otherwise provided in this
resolution, all rights, powers and privileges conferred and duties and liabilities imposed
upon the Issuer by the provisions of this resolution or the aforementioned documents
shall be exercised or performed by such officers, board, body or agency thereof as may
be required or authorized by law to exercise such powers and to perform such duties.
3
No covenant, stipulation, obligation or agreement herein contained or contained
in the aforementioned documents shall be deemed to be a covenant, stipulation,
obligation or agreement of any member of the City Council of the Issuer, or any
officer, agent or employee of the Issuer in that person's individual capacity, and
neither the City Council of the Issuer nor any officer or employee executing the Bonds
shall be liable personally on the Bonds or be subjeet to any personal liability or
accountability by reason of the issuance thereof.
No provision, covenant or agreement contained in the aforementioned
documents, the Bonds or in any other document related to the Bonds, and no obligation
therein or herein imposed upon the Issuer or the breaeh thereof, shall constitute or
give rise to any pecuniary liability of the Issuer or any charge upon its general credit
or taxing powers. In making the agreements, provisions, covenants and representations
set forth in such documents, the Issuer has not obligated itself to pay or remit any
funds or revenues, other than funds and revenues derived from the Loan Agreement
which are to be applied to the payment of the Bonds, as provided therein and in the
Indenture.
10. Except as herein otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this resolution or
in the aforementioned documents expressed or implied, is intended or shall be
construed to confer upon any person or firm or corporation, other than the Issuer or
any owner of the Bonds issued under the provisions of this resolution, any right,
remedy or claim, legal or equitable, under and by reason of this resolution or any
provision hereof, this resolution, the aforementioned documents and all of their
provisions being intended to be and being for the sole and exclusive benefit of the
Issuer and any owners from time to time of the Bonds issued under the provisions of
this resolution.
11. In ease any one or more of the provisions of this resolution, or of the
aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds issued hereunder shall for any reason be
held to be illegal or invalid, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other
provision of this resolution, or of the aforementioned documents, or of the Bonds, but
this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds shall be construed and
endorsed as if such illegal or invalid provision had not been contained therein.
12. The Bonds, when executed and delivered, shall contain a recital that they
are issued pursuant to the Act, and such recital shall be conelusive evidence of the
validity of the Bonds and the regularity of the issuance thereof, and that all acts,
conditions and things required by the laws of the State of Minnesota relating to the
adoption of this resolution, to the issuance of the Bonds and to the execution of the
aforementioned documents to happen, exist and be performed precedent to and in the
enactment of this resolution, and precedent to issuance of the Bonds and precedent to
the execution of the aforementioned documents have happened, exist and have been
performed as so required by law.
13. The officers of the Issuer, attorneys and other agents or employees of the
Issuer are hereby authorized to do all acts and things required of them by or in
connection with this resolution, the aforementioned documents, and the Bonds for the
full, punetual and complete performance of all the terms, covenants and agreements
contained in the Bonds, the aforementioned documents and this resolution. In the
event that for any reason the Mayor of the Issuer is unable to carry out the execution
of any of the documents or other aets provided herein, any�� other member of the City
4
Council of the Issuer shall be authorized to act in his capacity and undertake such
execution or aets on behalf of the Issuer with full force and effect, which executions
or acts shall be valid and binding on the Issuer. If for any reason the City
Administrator of the Issuer is unable to execute and deliver the documents referred to
in this Resolution, such documents may be executed by a member of the City Couneil
or the City Clerk with the same force and effect as if such documents were executed
and delivered by the City Administrator of the Issuer.
Adopted: , 1991
Attest:
City Clerk
�
5
Mayor
�`�" 1 � Vv
� �.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 15, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ�a�i��
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Lexington Heights Apartment Project �','�
Multi-Family Housing Revenue Bonds
DISCUSSION
At the time that the memo and resolutions for Item 5c on the
agenda were prepared, dollar amounts for each resolution were not
available. The blank amount in the two resolutions should be
completed as follows:
Resolution No. 91-15 (A) - $9,130,000
Resolution No. 91-16 (B) $1,870,000
ACTION REOIIIRED
Complete fill in on Resolutions prior to adoption.
LES:kkb
�
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 10, 1991
Mayor, City Council and City Adminis��
Tom Olund
Public Wor s Superintendent
SUBJECT: Purchase of Asphalt Hot Box
DISCUSSION•
Included in the 1991 Road and Bridge Department Budget
was $5,500 to purchase an asphalt hot box. The purpose of
the hot box, which is heated with propane, is to keep the
asphalt hot particularly in the spring and fall.
The City has been renting
al years from LaHass. Lahass
built one last year for us as
option to buy. The net price
$1,105.00 from rental (85% of
$3,895. This is the only bid,
other manufacturers.
RECOMMENDATION•
a hot box for the past sever-
custom builds these boxes and
our rental unit, with the
is $5,000 with a credit of
$1,300.00) for a total of
as we know of there being no
A hot box greatly improves the Street Department's
patches by keeping the bit�minous patching material hot as
the crew moves from patch to patch. The City has used a
rental machine for the past several years at a rental rate
of $1,300 per year. We are very please with the hot box
performance and recommend that one be purchased.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the
should pass a motion authorizing staff to
order to LaHass for their bid of $3�y895.
TJO:dfw
recommendation they
issue a purchase
�."r` �,6�,;,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 11, 1991
TO. Mayor, City Council and City Admin'�'"l��or
1 �
-� FROM: Klayton H. Eckles, Civil Engineer �L~
SUBJECT: Railroad Permit Agreement
Furlong Addition, Job No. 8616,
Improvemen� Na. 86, Project No. 4
DISCUSSIdN'
As part of the Furlong project City utilities must cross under
the Soa Line Railroad tracks. Crassing a railroad track requires that
the City enter into an agreement with the railroad. S�.aff has been
working with Soo Line to complete this agreement.
Attached is a capy of an agreement. Sao Line requires we enter
into thi.s agreement, which a.ncludes payment of $3,900 far perpetual
right to maintain utilities in the railroad property. This is almast
identical to other agreements the City has entered in the past. We
really don't have the ability to alter �he agreement to any extent,
1' RECdMMENDATIQN`
Staff recammends that Council approve the attached agreement.
ACTIt}N REUUIRED:
If Council canaurs with staff recommendation �hey shouZd pass a
motian adopting Resalution No. 91- , RESOLUTION AUTHORIZTNG THE CITY
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RATLROAD,
which allaws far city utilities to be instal,led and maintained acrass
Sao Line property.
KHE:dfw
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RAILROAD
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights wishes to install public
utilities across Soo Line Railroad property; and
WHEREAS, these utilities serve a vital public interest, and
WHEREAS, Soo Line Railroad has certain concerns and requirements
for the placement of utilities in a railroad right-of-way.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights that Mendota Heights agrees to the terms and condi-
tions of agreement Number 28187, including payment of $3,900.00 and
shall enter into this agreement and authorizes the Mayor to executethe
agreement on behalf of the City.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
m
PIPE LINE CROSSING PERMIT NO. 28187
.. THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of the lst day of April, 1991, by and
between S00 LINE RAILR4�D �O[+�ANY, party of the first part, hereinafter called
."Railroad Company", and CITY OF ME�IDOFrA HEI(��TS, 1101 Victoria �rve, Mendota
Heights, NID1 55118, party of the second part, hereinafter called "Licensee".
W I T N E S S E T H:
1. The Railroad Company grants to the Licensee permission to install and
maintain three pipe lines, not exceeding 8, 10 and 27 inches in diameter,
hereinafter called "pipe line", extending upon and across the Railroad Company's
property and tracks in the NW 1/4 SW 1/4 of Section 34, Township 28 North, Range
23 West, County of Dakota, at or near Mendota Heights, State of Minnesota, for a
distance of approximately 100 feet each at Railroad Suryey Stations 2433+98 - 27"
storm sewer; 2434+08 - 10" sanitary sewer, and 2434+23 - S" watermain, in the
location indicated in red and in accordance with the details as shown on the map
hereto attached marked "Exhibit A", and specifications hereto attached marked
"Exhibit B", at a depth of not less than 7.5 feet beneath the base of rail of any
railroad tracks located upon the property, to be used by the Licensee exclusively
for storm sewer, sanitary sewer and watermain purposes subject to the conditions
hereinafter set forth.
2. The Licensee shall pay the Railroad Company the sum of $3,900.00, payable
in advance as rental for the permission herein cjranted, and shall assume and pay
all taxes and assessments that may be levied or assessed against the pipe line, or
against the Railroad Company�s property by reason of the location of said pipe
line thereon. This provision for payment shall in no way restrict the Railroad
Company's right of termination under Paragraph 11 hereof.
3. The Licensee, after first securing all necessary public authority, shall
at the Licensee's sole expense install and thereafter maintain the pipe line upon
and across the Railroad Company's property and underneath any railroad tracks
located thereon at the above described location, in a manner satisfactory to the
Railroad Company's Chief Engineer, and in strict conformity with the requirements
of all laws, ordinances and orders of competent public authority now existing and
future modifications thereof, so as not to endanger the safety of railroad or
other operations upon said property and so as not to endanger the safety of the
persons or property near or adjacent to the Railroad Company's property.
4. The Li�censee shall be responsible for determining the location and
existence of any pipes, wires, conduits, sewers, piling or other obstructions to
the construction of Licensee's pipe line and shall indemnify Railroad Company for
any and all liability tor damage to the foregoing pipes, wires, conduits, sewers,
piling or other obstructions, if any, caused by the construction or maintenance of
Licensee's pipe line. The Railroad Company makes no representation by the
granting of this license that its property is free ot any such pipes, wires,
conduits, sewers, pilings or other obstructions.
5. The Licensee shall not carry on any work in connection with the installa-
tion, maintenance, repair, changing or renewal of the pipe line underneath or in
close proximity to any railroad track at the above described location before
Permit No. 28187
Page 1 of 3
r--
d
�
.-�' • .
giva.ng the Chief Engineer at least three days' written natice at his headquarters
located at Minneapolis, MiIu1@SOtdr and nat until an authorized representative of
the Rai3raad Gompany shall be present to stapervise same. Upon bills being
rendered therefar, �he Licensee shall promptly reimburse the Railroad Company far
all expenses incurred by it in connection with such supervision, including al2 �-
labor costs for flagmen supplied by the Railroad Company to protect railroad
operatians, and far the entire cost of the furnishing, installation and later
removal of any temporary supports for said tracks, which said Ch�.ef Engineer or
his authorized representative may consider necessary while such wark is in
proc}ress. In �he event af an emerqency af which ane af �he parties has knowledge
and believes may impact the ather party, however caused, the party with knawledge
shal2 make a reasanab3e effort to promptly notify the ather by teleghane,
6. Z'he Licensee at the Licensee's sole expense, whenever no�ified to do sa,
shall promptly make such repairs ta or changes in the pipe iine, including change
in location, as said Chief Engineer or his authorized representative shall far any
reason cansider necessary and require subject to regulations of iT.S. Department of
Transporta�.ion and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
7. Maintenance and use of the pipe iine upon and across the Railroad
Company's property at the above described location, however, lang cantinued, shall
not vest in the Licensee any righ�s adverse to those af the Railroad Campany,
8. The Licensee sha3.3. assutne all risk of damage to ar destruction of the pipe
line through any cause whatsoever whzle located upon and across the Railraad
Campany's property, and shall at all times fully indemnify the Railroad Campany
against all. liability, claims, demands, suits, judgements, casts and expenses by
reason of loss or damage to property and injury to 4r death af pecsons wha�soever
or whomsoever, in any ,manner arising from ar grow�ng�out, of, directly or
iridirectly, wholly or in part,.the installation, maintenance;� repair, changing,
renewal, existence or removal of the pipe line upon, across or from the Railroad
Company's property at the above described location.
9. The wai.ver by the Railroad Company of a breach by the Lic�nsee of any
provision hereof, shall be 1imi�ed �o the act or omission constituting such
breach, and shall nat constitute a can�inuing ar germanen�. waiver.
10. The agreement or the germissian herein granted shall not be assigned or
transferred by the Licensee in any manner, by operatian of law or otherwise,
without the written consent of the Railroad Company. Subject thereto, this
agreement shall inure to the benefit af, and be binding upon, the successors,
assigns and legal representa�.ives af the respec�ive parties.
11. This agreement shall con�inue in effect until terminated by either par�y
upon thirty (30) days' written notice ta the other party. Any notice given by the
Railroad Company hereunder shali be good if depasited in a Uni�.ed States past
office, certified mail, addressed to the Licensee at the Licensee's las�. known
address.
12. The Licensee at the Licensee's sole expense, within thirty days from the
date o£ service of notice of termination as above provided, shall take up and
remove said pipe line from the Rai.lroad Company's property at the above described
location and restore said property to a candition satisfactary to said Chi.ef
Permit No. 281$7
Page 2 of 3
Engi.neer. Failure on �he part of the Licensee kc� do so shal]. c.�nsti tu�e an
abandonment af �he pipe line by the Licensee, and the Railroad Company shall have
the right ta remave the whole or any part af the pipe line from said property and
perform said work of restaration, and in either event the Licensse, upon a bill
being rendered therefor, shall promp�ly reimburse the Railroad Company for al1
expenses incurred in connection therewitti, plus fifteen percer�t.
13. The Railroad Company shall not be required to assume any por�.ion af the
cast af the canstruc�ion of said pipe line ar fu�ure maintenanee thereof.
IN W��SS Wt�70F, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be duly
executed as of the day and year first above wri�ten.
Witnesses:
S00 LINE RAILRCIAD C4MPANY
8y .
Assistan� Vice Presi en� Rea Estate
cz�r oF M�rrpo�r�. �rc�rrs
By
Its
.
• � ••ra+� ••�
Permit No, 2$187
Page 3 of 3
GEORGE'S
GQ�.F
- .t. �
� ..
t.AKE \
t LE M
�
F�
y y��ti
�i�,j.. `
SS
EROOK'3 �
�� p .� ,
, � A � ,.�,�
��T�" '�C (� /! pN�iECT TO
' ( X{3TlN{#
� .. � . /SANlTARY
SEWER
-COMNECT TO '
E)CISTIN6
MNdQT
MENOOTA HEIt3HTS ROAD .'
PROJECT� l
I"= 400+
CEMETERY
(ASSE33iBLE
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ�
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk �
SUBJECT: Computer System Upgrades
INTRODUCTION
The computer
IBM-PS2 which was
State Aid system
hard-drive storag
to capacity and a
capability.
INFORMATION
April 10, 1991
which functions as the network server and the
purchased primarily through Mn/DOT Municipal
funding, were originally configured with minimum
e space. Both of those drives are nearly filled
re in need of expansion and tape back-up
The two computers were originally configured with relatively
low storage capacity (80 megabyte storage on the server and 70 mb
on the PS-2), to save money. It was anticipated that as our need
for storage grew, the price of drives would come down. There are
currently 14 computers in the network. All of the software used
by the Administration/Engineering/Utility staff inembers, plus the
network software, is stored on the server. We have been very
careful not to store data on the drive in an attempt to delay
hard-drive expansion as long as possible. During the past six
months, however, we have been developing a number of large data
bases which are shared by staff inembers and are too large to fit
on floppy disks. In order to maximize use of the network and
develop and maintain such records as fixed assets, etc., more
storage capacity on the system is mandatory. Data back-up, which
must be done bi-weekly, to insure that our records are not lost
in the event of malfunction, ties up the network and the computer
station which has a tape drive. As currently configured, it is a
cumbersome process and is admittedly not done bi-weekly.
The IBM PS-2 is generally run independent of the network,
although it is a part of the network system and is used to
monitor network activities and perform trouble-shooting on the
system. The MSA programs and data take up approximately 25% of
the 70 megabyte drive. All of the other storage on the drive is
software. The software stored on this computer includes the word
processing, graphics, desktop publishing and spreadsheet packages
used for the newsletter and budget, as well as other uses. There
are less than 10 megabytes remaining on the drive - not enough to
build and store the fonts necessary to prepare a newsletter
without swapping fonts back and forth from the floppy drive.
Additionally, there is no ability to properly backup the drive
(which should be done regularly) except to back up to the floppy
drive. If back-up were performed, it would take 70 disks and the
better part of a day. Rather than devoting the time and expense
of backing up the drive, we have chosen not to do so and run the
risk of having to reinstall all of the software in the event of a
serious power surge.
Storage devices are much larger and much less costly now
than when the two computers were purchased. Our computer
consultant, Doug Banyan, and i feel that purchase of hard drives
and tape back-up is now both cost effective and necessary. The
anticipated cost for the drives is $1,900 for`a 380 mb drive for
the network server and $800 for a 180 mb drive for the PS-2. A
tape back-up unit for the PS-2 will cost $435. Total cost for
hardware for the upgrades will be $3,135. A tape back-up unit
will be removed from one of the other computers in the system and
will be installed in the server. Installation of the drive in
the server will be costly, however there is sufficient funding
available in the computer consulting line items to support the
cost. In any event, much of the installation cost will be
expended to reconfigure and clean up the existing drive even if
the drive expansion is not approved. Installation costs for the
PS-2 upgrades will be minimal.
Although these system upgrades were not budgeted for 1991,
the Administration budget includes $3,000 for equipment (a new
computer and miscellaneous office equipment). Upgrading of the
server and PS-2 are more important this year than acquisition of
a new computer. Since the utility billing operation is supported
by the server, it is suggested that the Utility Fund be assessed
$500 of the total drive cost.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that Council authorize the purchase of two
computer hard-drives and a tape back-up unit as described above.
ACTION RE4UIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a
motion authorizing the purchase of one 180 megabyte hard drive,
one 380 megabyte hard drive and one tape back-up unit for a total
purchase price not to exceed $3,200.
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
April 16, 1991
Masonry Licenses
Arrow Construction
Carlson Masonry, Inc.
Fleischhacker, M.F.-Inc.
Grabak Construction
London Brick
Stockness Construction, Inc.
Excavating Licenses
A & B Construction
olsen's Sewer Service, Inc.
Plymouth Plumbing, Inc.
St. Paul Utilities & Exc., Inc.
Schmidt, T.A.-& Sons Exc.
Specialized Turf, Inc.
Gas Piping Licenses
Flare Htg. & A/.C, Inc.
MN Plmb. & Htg., Inc. �
Royalton Htg. & Cooling
General Licenses
College City Construction, Inc.
Dakota Fence of MN, Inc.
Greenwoldt Construction, Inc.
Hables Construction Co. (The)
Homemaster Builders, Inc.
Kranz, D.J.-Co., Inc.
Meaney, F.P.-Construction
Midwest Fence & Mfg. Co., Inc.
Sonnek Construction Co., Inc.
Heating Licenses
Boehm Heating
Flare Htg. & A/C, Inc.
MN Plmb. & Htg., Inc.
Royalton Htg. & Cooling Co.
.�. '-�..
.�.+'����3tK,'+.'�+f+�,�e�,3~`it�sc�,4;�.'�s�4.•���..��i:"�.ia�.��iA:�?:�::�n�:f;Si�',�i!'2�.C�'s�s?i�?i�i��aN"�i�'tn#1`riis7i
Rpiil I6, .I991
TO: Magor and City Council
CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY:
TotaZ C2a'mc
Significant Cla;mc
Board of Water Co�n
Barr Engr
LMCIT
Med Center
UnusuaZ Claims
94,807
Project hookup 9,488
Water study 8,605
Work Comp ins prem 52,721
May hea�th ins 8,641
Y�
L
0
••yi ' Dept 10.Adm Dept 50-Rd6Br; e
15-Engr 60UtiZiti�g
12 Apr 19' 4/16/9Z C 1 a i rns L i st 20-Police 70-Parks
Fri 1:56 r.. • City aP Mendc�ta Heights 30-Fire 80-Planning
�' 40-CEO 85-RecycZing
Tetnp Check Nurnber 1 90-RnzmaZ Control
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendor N�rne Accaunt Cc�de
1 AT&T 01-4�1Q�-@��h-20
1
Tot�ls Ternp Check Number 1
Ternp Check Nurn6er �
2 Ashton Tate 01-4301-110-10
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber �
Ternp Check Number 3
3 L�arr Engir�eering Co 18-42�@-7@Q�-@0
_ �
Tc�tals Ternp Check Nurnber 3
Ternp Check N�unber 4
4 E+aard of Water Cernmissic+ners 01-4425-31Q�-7@
4 E+c�ard c�f Water Carnrnissianers 01-44�5-315-3Q�
4 Pcard af Water Cornrnissianers Q�8-44�5-@Q�0-QQ�
� 4 E+oard af Water Cc�rnrnissianers 01-44�J�3SQ�—JQ�
4 Ecoard �f Water Cornrnissianers �8-446Q�-867-0@
4 Poard c�f Water Cc,rnrnissianers 36-446Q�-843-Q�0
24
Tot�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 4
Temp Check Nurnber 5
5 Capitc�l Supply 08-4335-0Q�0-Q0
5 -
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 5
iernp Check Number 6
6 Canvas Praducts @1-4305-Q+3Q�-30
6
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber 6
Ternp Check Number 7
7 City Matar Supply Q�1-4330-44@-20
7 City Motar Supply Q�1-4330-43Q�-50
Cc�mrnents
Apr svc
upgrade sw
Re wtr res plan
qtrly chg
Mar svc
Mar svc
Mc:i^ SVC
Re 88-6
Re 9Qt-1
splys
Re cover 2281
parts
parts
Page 1
Amc�urh
5. 90
5. 90
54. @Qi
54. Q�@
8, 65�5. 28
8, 6Q�5. 28
3. 99
91. 74
25.98
7. 13
23. �6
9, 335. 69
9� 487. 79
12. 3�
1 �. 32
24@. @0
�4@. @@
1 ��. 94
18. 51
t '
L I
1� Apr 19' Clairns List
Fri 1:56 .. City aF Mendata Heights
Temp Check Number 7
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendc�r Narne Accc�unt Cade
7 City Mc�tc�r Supply 1�-433@-490-6Q�
21
Tatals Temp Check N�un6er 7
Temp Check Nurnber 8
S Cornrnunicatic�ns Center 01-433Q�-460-30
8
TGtals Ternp Check Nurnber 8
Ternp Check Nivnber 9
9 Cor�tinent�l Cablevisic�n @1-4�Q�0-610-20
9 Cantinental Cablevisic�n 01-42Q�@-610-30
18
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber �
Ternp Check Nurnber 1@
1@ Cc�nnect Inc 01-4�00-610-3Q�
10
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber iQ�
Ternp Check Number 11
li Cc�rrigar� Electric @1-4335-31:,-3�
li
Taials Ternp Check Nurn6er 11
Temp Check N�unber 12
1� Cre�tive Colars 01-4330-215-70
, 12
Tc+tals Ternp Check Nurnber 12 '
Temp Check Number 13 '
13 D�hlgren Shardlaw Uban 01-4221-135-8Q�
13 Dahlgren Sh�rdlaw Uban Q�1-422@-135-8Q�
26
. Totals Temp Check Nurnber 13
Ternp Check Nurnber 14
�
14 D�kota County Charnber of Carnrn @1-4400-110-10
Carnrnents
parts
splys
Apr svc
Apr svc
car�n chg
rprs
p�int
Mar svc
Mar re SE area
4/25 mtg T Lawell
F�age 2
Arnc�unt
1 S. 40
SJG.BJ
124.74
124. 74
5. 95
J. �J
11.9Q�
6. 47
6. 47
446. 88
446. 88
67. ¢�4
67. ¢�4
1 � 408. @@
672, 94
2, 08@. 94
9. 00
i
r
, 12 Apr 19:
Fri 1:56 �.
Ternp Check N�un6er 14
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendcr Narne
14
Tc�t�ls Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 15
15 Dakc�ta Caunty Tech Inst
15
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check N�irnber 16
16 Designer 5ign Systerns
16
T�tals Ternp Check Nurnber
Temp Check N�unber 17
17 F R S Capitc+l Mkt Grp
17
Tc�tals Ternp Check Number
� Ternp Check Nurnber 18
18 Fisher Rhc�tc Supply
18
Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber
Tetnp Check Nurnber 19
19 Frar�z Engr
19 Franz Engr
19 Fr�nz Engr
19 Franz Engr
76
Totals Temp Check Number
Temp Check Nurnber 2@
2Q� Gaadyear Service Store
2@
Tc,tals Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber �1
21 Gr�phic Desing Inc
�1
Clairns List
City of Menduta Heights
Accoirrit Cc�de
14
@1-4400-02@-��
SJ
01-43@Q�-080-80
16
01-449@-11@-10
17
01-4305-0�0-�@
18
Q�9-4490-Q+00-00
Q�5-4305-1 Q�5-15
@5-4305-105-15
05-43@5-105-15
19
01-433Q�-44@-20
20
01-4268-651-85
Cc�mrnerh s
h1ar trng
narnepl�te
qtrly chg safekeeping
Mar svc
splys
splys
splys
spiys
rprs
prtg
F�age 3
Arnc�ur�t
'3. 0Q�
450. @0 ,
4.�0. Q�0
19. @Q�
1'3. @Q
2. 25
�. �J
75. 3s
75. 33
18. 19
37. 28
�7. 30
158.6�
241. 39
33. 00
33. 00
72. 00
7�. Q�Q�
� •
r'
f 1� Apr 1�� �
Fri 1:56 �
Ternp Check Nurnber 21
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendc�r N�rne
T�tals Ternp Check Nurnber
Temp Check Nurnber ��
�2 Hdwe Hank
22
Tat�ls Ternp. Check Number
Ternp Check Ntirnber �3
23 Holst Exc
23
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 24
24 I O S
24 I O S
24 I 0 S
24 I 0 S
24 I O S
24 I O S
24 I O S
24 I O S
�4 I 0 S
�lE
Tatals Ternp Check N��rnber
Temp Check Num6er 25
25 ICMR
� 25
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
, Temp Check Nurnber 26
�6 I C M A R T
, 26 I C M A R T
52
Totals Temp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 27
27 Kar Rroducts
27 K�r Praducts
Claims List
City af Mendc�ta Heights
Accaunt Cc�de
�i
01-4305-030-3Q
��
01-44LS-Q�JQ��JQ�
23
01-449Q�-i Q�9-@'3
Q� 1-433Qt-49Q�-1 @
Q�1-4268-Q85-85
01-4330-490-30
01-4330-445-4@
@1-43Q0-08@-8@
@5-433Q�-490-15
15-433Q�-490-6Q�
Q+9-4490-Q�Q�O-�@
24
01-44@4-11Q�-10
�J
@1-2@72
Q� 1-4134-11 @-1 Q�
26
Q�S-�#JQ�J-Q�JQ��J�
01-4305-@70-7Q
Carnrnerh s
splys
icing sa»d
Apr rntcn
Apr mtcn
Apr rntcn
Apr rntcn
Apr rntcn
Apr rntcn
Apr rntcr�
Apr rntcn
Apr rntcn
91 dues
3/2� payroll
3/�2 payrall
SPZyS
splys
F'age 4
Amaur�t
6. 77
6. 77
30@. 05
30@.0�
16.75
iQ6. 10
4. 50
S8. JJ
16. 75
37.65
72. 35
19. 36
6. 95
�98. 96
27@.Q@
�7Q.00
175.72
91. 32
267.�4
89. 7Qt
89. 7Q�
r.
, 12 Apr 1�9
Fri 1 :56 F. ,
Temp Check N�unher 27
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendc�r Narne
�7 Kar F�raducts
81
Tc�tals Temp Check N�anber
Temp Check N�irn6er 28
28 Knax Camrnercial Credit
�8 Knax Carnrnercial Credit
�8 Knax Camrnercial Credit
28 Knc�x Carnrnercial Credit
�8 Knc�x Commercial Credit
28 Knax Camrnercial Credit
28 Knox Carnrnerc i� 1 Cred i t
28 Knox Carnrnercial Credit
224
Tc�tals Temp Check N�unber
Temp Check Nurnber �'3
2� Tharnas Knuth
�9 Thc�mas Kr�uth
J8
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check N��rnber 3@
30 Kakesh
J�
. Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber
Temp Check Nurnber 31
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
31 L M C I T
341
Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber
Temp Check Nurnber 3�
Clairns List
City of Mendc�ta Heights
Accc�unt Cc�de
1�-4305-060-6�t
�7
Q� S ��#JQ�S�Q�JQ�-JQ�
Q� 1-433Q�-� 15-70
@ i -43Q�;,-070-70
Q� S -GJQ�J-Q�JQ��JQ�
Q� S -�#JQ�J-Q�JQ�-JQ�
01-43@5-070-70
01-4305-07Q�-7Q�
�c 1-4.��J-Q�J@-SQ�
28
Q��-4415-000-@0
05-4415-105-15
29
01-4435-2@@-70
30
01-4133-11 Q�-1 Q�
01-4133-02Q�-�0
@1-4133-@31-30
QI-4133-@4Q�-4@
01-4133-@5@-50
Q� 1-4133-Q�70-70
05-4133-105-15
15-4133-@6@-60
01-1�15
0J-S2S5
15-1�15
31
Cornrnerit s
splys
5F7I)/S
spiys
splys
splys
splys
splys
tax
splys
rni reirnb
rni reirnb
sc�ftbail/kitteribail splys
8 rnas wc ir�s
8 mos wc ins
8 mas wc ins
8 rnas wc ins
8 mc�s wc ir�s
8 rnos wc ins
8 rnas wc ins
8 rnos wc ins
4 rnus 9� wc
4 rnas 9� wc
4 rnas 92 wc
Page S
Amc�unt
8'3. 75
�69.15
46. 14
44. 78
61.97
176. 14
19. '3�
47. 31
2.68cr
60. 82
454. 47
51. 70
9. 35
61. 05
740. 60
740. 60
281. 2@
15� 324.::5
3, 936. 50
1, 019. �5
5, 764. �0
1 � 897. 95
4� 112. �5
2� 811. 75
14� 111.65
2, Qt56. 10
1 � 4Q�5. 90
5�� 721. 0@
0
1
,
ti
1� Apr 19'
Fri 1:56 .-..
Ternp Check Number 3�
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendar Narne
32 Leef E+rc�s
32 Leef E�ros
3� Leef E�rc�s
96
T�tals Temp Check N�imber
Ternp Check N��rnber 33
33 M A Assc�ciates
33 M A Rssociates
33 M A Assaciates
99
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 34
34 Med Centers H F'
34 Med Cer�ters H R
34 Med Centers H F�
34 Med Centers H F�
?,4 Med Centers H R
34 Med Cer�ters H P
34 Med Centers H R
34 Med Centers H F�
34 Med Centers H R
3Q�E
Tvtals Ternp Check Nurnber
Temp Check IVurnber 35
35 Mendota Heights Rubbish'
3� ri1endc�t� Heights Rubbish'
, 35 Menduta Heights Rubbish'
35 Menduta Heights Rubbish'
� 140
Totals Temp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Number 36
36 Mendota Heights Landscape
36
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber
Temp Check Nurnber 37
� 37 Micrasoft Update
��7
Clairns List
City c�f Mendc�ta Heights
Accaunt Code
@1-4335-310-50
01-4335-�10-7@
15-4335-314�-60
3�
Q� 1 -�1.^SQ�J-�JQ-J�
01-43Qt5-070-7@
15-43�C5-@60-60
33
@ 1-�Q�74
@1-4131-110-10
@ 1-4131-Q��0-i.0
@i-4131-Q40-40
01-4131-05Q�-50
01-4131-¢�70-70
@5-4131-105-15
15-4131-@6@-60
08-4110-00@-@0
34
01-4280-310-50
01-4e80-31@-7@
15-428@-31@-60
Q� 1-4280-315-3Q�
35
01-4500-05Q�-�0
36
01-43Q� 1-•11 Q�-10
�
Ccmrnent s
Mar svc
Mar svc
Mar svc
splys
splys
splys
Apr prern
M�y prern
May prern
May prern
May prern
May prern
May prern
May prern
May prern
Mar svc
Mar svc
Mar svc
Mar svc
tree svc
upd�te
Rage 6
Amaunt
9. 96
9. 96
9. 96
29. 88
19. 65
19.65
19.70
59. Q�0
1, 783. 85
1, 244. 80
�, 377. 95
5QiQt. 0Q�
1, Q78. 1@
2@5. 70
87�. 4Q
�FJJ. 8Q�
1��.40
8, 641. @0
79. 5Q
79. 5Q�
79. 5@
4�. 40
280. 9@
325. 0Q�
325. 0@
269. 0Q�
269. @Q�
.: �
12 Apr 13', Claims List
Fri 1:�6 � City of Mendata Heights
Ternp Check Nurnber 37
Ternp. •
Check
• N�vnber Vendar Narne Accaur�t Cc�de
Tot�ls Temp Check Nurnber 37
Ternp Check Nurnber 38
38 Midwest Rusiness Rroducts @i-43Q�4�-11Q�-10
38
, Totais Ternp Check Nurnber 38
Ternp Check Nurnber 39
39 Midwest Photo Svc @1-43@5-Q�20-20
39
Tot�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 39
Ternp Check Nurnber 40
40 Midwest Siren Service Q�7-43.;0-000-Q0
40
Tatals Terop Check Nurnber 4@
Ternp Check N�unber 41
41 Minnesata Glove Inc Q�S��FJQ�J-Q�JQ�-JQ�
41
Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 41
Ternp Check Nurnber 42
, 4� Minn Dept af Revenue Q�1-43�0-@50-50
42
Tatals Ternp Check Nurnber 42
Temp Check Number 43
�
43 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-�072
43
Tatals Ternp Check Number 43
Ternp Check Nurnber 44
44 Minn Fire Agencies Q�1-4404-@30-30
44
Totais Temp Check N��rnber 44
Ternp Check Nurnber 45
Cc�rnrnent s
splys
Mar svc
Apr mtcn
SPZyS
M�r fuel tax
4/5 payrall
91 dues
F'age 7
Amc�unt
41. 84
41.84 �
7@. 71
7@.71
62.4Q
6�.40 '
59.76
�9. 76
35. 6@
35. 60
e�5. Q�0
225. 0Q�
35. @0
35. 0Q�
i '
, ,
1� Apr 19' Claims List
Fri 1:56 � City uf Mendata Heights
Ternp Check Nurnber 45
Ternp.
Check
Number Ver�dar N�rne Account Cc�de
45 Minnesota Te�rnsters Lac 320 @1-2075
45
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 45
Ternp Check Number 46
4E Minnesc,ta Canway • Qt1-4305-03@-30
46 Mirm�esCta Ccnw�y Q�1-43Q��-Q�3@-30
46 Minnesota Cc�r�way � 01-4305-Q�30-3Q
138
Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 46
Temp Check Nurnber 47
47 Narth Star Cancrete Co 4�8-4335-@00-00
47 North St�r Cc�ncrete Ca 01-4305-03Q-3@
47 North Star Concrete Ca Q�S�GJQ�J�Q�JQ�-JQ�
47 Narth St�r Cuncrete Ca Q1-4305-07Q�-7Q�
47 Narth Star Cc�ricrete Cc� 15-4305-06Q-60
235
Tat�ls Ternp Check Nurnber 47
Ternp Check Nurnber 48
48 Northern State Pawer 01-4212-315-30
48 Narthern State Rower @1-4�1e-31Q�-50
48 Nc,rthern State Rc�wer Q1-4212-31Q�-7¢�
48 Northern State Fawer 15-4212-310-60
48 Narthern State Power 01-4212-32Q�-7@
� 48 Nurthern State Rower 15-4212-400-60
48 Northern State Rc+wer Q8-4212-00@-0@
48 Narthern State F'awer @1-4211-31@-5@
� 48 Nc�rthern Staie Gawer 01-4211-31@-7@
48 IVorthern State Fawer 15-4211-310-60
48 Northern State Power 28-4Z11-@0@-@0
, 48 Northern 5tate power @1-4211-32Qt-70
575
s Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 48
Ternp Check Nurnber 49
49 Northern St�te Rcwer 15-4211-4Q�Q-60
, 49
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 49
� Temp Check N�vnber 50
50 F'cwer Brake Eq 01-4330-490-50
4
Cc�mments
Apr dues
spiys
splys
splys
fire ext test
credit balar�ce
fire ext test
��
Apr svc
Apr svc
Rpr svc
Apr svc
Apr svc
Apr svc
apr avc
Apr svc
Apr svc
Apr svc
Apr svc
Apr svc
Apr svc
p�rts
F�age 8
Amc�unt
�22. ¢�0
���. QtQ�
72. Q�Q�
84. 97
148. 16
305. 13
34.50
41. 85cr
7�. 80
72. 8Q�
72. 90
211.15
308. 67
3'3.:,. 99
39.:,. 93
396. Q�Q�
33. 32
25. 44
40@. 58
86. 99
86. 99
87. Q�0
11.96
36. 26
2, �65. 19
29. 43
29. 43
173. 18 `
�
1� Apr 19'
Fri 1:5fs ,
'z
iernp Check N�anber 50
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendor Narne
�Q� Pawer Brake Eq
5� Pawer Rrake Eq
15@
Tatals Temp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nusnber �1
51 Rublic Erapl Ret Assn
�1
Tc�tals iernp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Number :,2
�� Fjrad R�gan Irtc
J�.
Tat�3s Ternp Check iVurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 53
53 8h�mrock Cleaners
53
Tc<t�ls Temp Check hlurnber
Temp Checlt Nuraber 54
5k Shade in a Day
54
, Tatals 7emp Check Nurnber
7ernp Check Nurnber 5S
55 Salberg Aggregate
� 55
Tatals 7ernp Check Nurnber
� Temp Check Nurnber 56
56 Snyder Drug Stares
56 Snyder Drug 5tcres
56 Srryder Drug 5tores
56 Snyder Drug Stares
2�4
Totals Temp Check Nurnher
Temp Check Nurnber 57
Claims List
Gity af Mendata Heights
Acc�unt Cc�de
Q� 1-k33Q�-49Q�-50
¢� 1-433Q-490-50
JQ�
Q�2-4131-130-10
JS
Qt 2 -433fA-49Q{-7�
Ji
01-441Q�-02m-20
J.�i
Q�9-4460-Q100-@r2Y
54
Q�1-4�r21-050-5Q+
55
Q�3-�227
01-4305-Q�G0-: fb
01-k305-070-7Q�
(Li 1-4305-tU3Qt-3Q�
56
Cornrnerit s
splys
core credit
May prem
rprs
Mar cir�g
tree svc Re parks
sand
splys i}are grog
splys
5p1y5
splys
Rage 9
Amour�t
�2. 96
��. Q+Ocr
1�6.14
54. @0
54. Q��h
38. 84
38. 84
45. 69
45. 69
6Q�i�. @0
6�Z+Q�. Q�Q�
�3. 4@
:�3. 4@
i1.86
s. as
36. 93
7. Qs9
E+�. 73
,
�..
�';
` 12 Apr 19'• Clairos List
Fri 1:56 � City af Mendata Heights
Ternp Check Number 57
iernp-
Check
Nurnber Vendcm Narne Account Cc�de
.�i7 Spectrum Cc�rnp & Printer Rpr 01-4330-4'3�-SQ�
�7
Tr_�tals Temp Check Ntunber 57
Tern¢ Check iViirnber 58 ,
58 Sterling Electric Q�S-�tJQ�J-Q�SQ-JQ�
JS
Tc�trals 7ernp Check Nurnber 58
Terop Check Nurnber 59
.�'i9 Sun Newspapere Q�3-4�4Q�-13L�-14�
�9 Sur� i1lew�papei^s Q�3-4��r#it-QitdQ�-Q�tZ}
�9 Sun Newspaper� 33-4�4¢�-l941-Q��1
5'3 Suri IVewSpapers 01-k�4@-Q�80-8Q�
59 Sun Newspapers �h1-4�40-�SQ�-80
295
Tc�tals Terap Check hlurnber 59
Temp Check Number 6@
60 Tripp Qil @1-121Q�
6id
Tot�is 7erap Check Nutnber 50
l"ecnp Gheck Nurnber 63
Eri Thampsc,n F'lurnbing @1-32�4
51 Thompsan Flurnbing 01-32�5
6i Thornpsan Plurnbing 01-3315
61 Tharnpson Rlurnbing 15-3252
61 Thomgsc�n Plumbing 15-3315
� 3�D5
Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 61
, Temp Gheck Number 6�
62 3ata2 We�ther �h:�-k49C�-IQ�5-f5
62 �
Tc�tals Ternp Check IVumber 62
Ternp Check Nurnber 63
63 ireadway Graphics Q�1-21�7
63
Camrnerh s
prtr rprs
sply�
Re orc! G74
bid �d 8'3-6
bid ad 89-7
Re hrg nai3ce
Iil^] Yf0't Yt2WVBC'i.QY`
no lead gas
rfd perrn3a95
rds perrn �878
slchg rfd
rfd per 3�48
stchg rfd
313� svc
t-shirts d�re prag
Rage 10
Amc��mt
1 G6. 00
348. AQ}
5G.6@
.�.ftt. �i%L�
$'3. '-'$
17.9�
J'�F. JG
i 6. 74
17. 36
195. 92
1, 5�;�. 9@
i, 59:�. 9+i{
40. @0
5. @0
1. QkQ�
17.50
�. JQ�
64. 00
� ., ) 1
12 Apr 19�
Fri 1:56 {-..
l
Ternp Check Nurnber 63
Ternp.
Check
Nurnber Vendar N�rne
T�tals Terop Check Number
Ternp Check Number 64
64 U S West Ccmmunicatic�ns
64 U S West Carnrn��nicatic�r�s
64 U S West Cc�mrn�inicatic�r�s
64 U S West Cammunicatians
64 U S West Communicaticns
3�Q�
Tot�ls Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 65
65 Uniforms Unlirnited
65
" Tct�ls Ternp Check Nurnber
Ternp Check Nurnber 66
66 Z�rnath Brush Wc�rks Inc
66
Tatals Ternp Check N�unber
J�1JQ�
6r�nd Total
Clairns List
City c,f Mendota Heights
Accc�rrh Cc�de Cc�mrnents
63
@i-4�1@—Qr20—�¢� Rpr svc
15-4210—@60-6Q� Apr svc
0S-�#�SQ��Q�JQ�-JQ� Apr svc
Q�1-4�10—Q�70-70 Apr svc
1:.r-421@-06Q�-60 Rpr svc
64
01-441@-020-20 splys Olson
65
01-4305—Q�70-70 • splys
66 MANUAL CdECKS:
13072 20.00 MAUMA Regr BatcheZder
10075 45.00 Shorty Wick exp reimb
13077 150.00 City of Eagan deposit ballfields
Z3078 250.80 ? RE softbaZl
13079 475.65 Dakota Countg Bank replenish petty cash
33080 643.47 PERR p.d. retro pay
1308Z 6,630.71 Barton Aschmann RE parks
23082 168,00 Dakota Cty Dist Court p.d. warrants
13083 543.00 Ramsey Cty warran6s " •
13084 3,739.50 SCCU 4/5 pagroZZ deductions
13085 503.57 U. S. Pest office se�er bills
13086 7,997.05 PERA 3/22 payro2l
Z3i787 13,006.70 Dakota County Bank 4/5 w/h
Z3088 3,331.55 /Co�mni.ssioner of REv 4/5 sit
13089 450.00 Dakota Countg Bank 4/5 payroll deductions
13090 43,291.19 Payro2l a/c 4/5 net payroZl
81,345.39
G.T. 176,152.22 '
F�age 11
Amourit
111.64
295. 4`3
1 �#. .58
14.38
14. 38
45@.�7
116.85
116. B5
3@1.50
301. SQ�
94� 806. 83
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 16, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ�
FROM: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assistan�
SUBJECT: Tree Donation for City Hall - Mendota Heights Garden Club
*** FOR INFORMATION ONLY ***
DISCUSSION
Once again, the Mendota Heights Garden Club has generously
offered to donate a tree to City Hall in honor of Arbor Day. Like
last year,'the donated tree is proposed to be a Red Splendor Crab
Apple Tree. I am proposing to align it along Victoria Curve by the
parking lot just west of where last year's Red Splendor was
planted.
I am bringing this to your attention in order to invite you to
the Tree Planting Dedication. At this point, it is tentatively
scheduled for Friday, April 26th, time yet �to be determined. A
more definite time should be confirmed•in the very near future.
ACTION REOIIIRED
If any Councilmember desires to attend the Tree Planting
Dedication, they should contact City Administrator Tom Lawell for
details on date and time that will be scheduled.
KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MuM�u[�]
April 16, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administx��r
FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager
SUBJECT: Mendakota Park Buildings - Award of Bids
IiISTORY
On January 15, 1991, Council selected Station 19 Architects to
design three structures which would be built in Mendakota Park.
Estimated costs were: comfort station with observation deck -
$75,000; picnic shelter/band pavilion -$35,000; information Kiosk
-$5,000 for a total of $110,000. As with the Sibley development,
the City would act as general contractor and hire subcontractors to
perform the work.
DISCOSSION
Plans, specifications and bid information packets were
prepared and the project was divided into eleven bid areas. Forty-
seven packets were sent to subcontractors and twenty-seven bids
were received by the deadline.
Two contractors submitted bids to construct the entire
project, one for approximately $122,800 and the second for
$124,800. With the bids I received from the individual
subcontractors, the three structures can be constructed for
approximately $103,000. There will be several change orders which
will add approximately $4,000 to the this cost and a five percent
(5�) ($5,000) contingency should be included which brings the
anticipated maximum cost to $112,000.
RECOMMENDATION
Because the construction of the park is proceeding rapidly and
the areas where the buildings will be constructed could be ready
within the next couple of weeks, I request that the Council award
contracts to the following firms:
FIRM BASE BID FOR
F.M. Fleischhacker
Interstatg Lumber
B.T.L. ConstructiQn'
Approved Electric�Co.
L&M Painting
Pace Roofing
Stueve Tile
J.T.S. Services
BOE Ornamental Iron
$28,735.00
$21,651.00
$11,900.00
$ 7,950.00
$ 2,345.00
$ 3,850.00
$ 1,650.00
$ 1,197.00
$ 5,817.00
Concrete Block & Flatwork
Lumber & Materials
Carpentry Work (Labor)
Electrical
Painting and Staining
Elastic Sheet Roofing
Quarry Tile
Stainless Steel
Misc. Metal & Metal
Railings
Due to a change of materials and some overlapping of bid items
the low bidders in two areas have not been determined. I request
that the Council authorize me to select the low bidder once I have
cleared up the confusion. The work items and "not-to-exceed" costs
are:
1. Cedar Shingle Roofing -
2. Plumbing and Accessory Items -
ACTION REOUIRED
Z��+nme�nwc� =L�a��orS
$ 9, 000. 00 � 8'son .o �
$11,000.00 �--
7� a as. o0
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should award the contracts listed above and authorize Parks Project
Manager Guy Kullander to select two additional contractors for work
areas listed above.
GDK:kkb
.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis��a
FROM: Klayton H. Eckles, Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Assessment Roll
Furlong Addition, Job No. 8616,
Improvement No. 86, Project No. 4
DISCUSSION•
April 11, 1991
Staff has completed the assessment roll for the Furlong Addition
(see attached). In order to complete the assessment roll, a total
project cost estimate had to be computed and the amount of Tax Incre-
ment Financing (T.I.F) involvement had to be calculated.
The total project cost was estimated to be $1.18 million in the
feasibility report. This is no longer accurate since the project has
been redesigned and bids have been received. To generate a new esti-
mate the contractor's bid of $599,825 was added to all the other
project costs already encountered as well as estimated future costs.
These costs include:
Preliminary Studies
Feasibility Reports
Survey Staking
Easement Acquisition
Easement Preparation
Project Design
Assessment Roll Preparation
Bonding Cost and Construction
Interest
St. Paul Water Charges
Administration & Misc. Costs
Contingencies
When all these past ar�d anticipated costs are totaled, the result
is an estimated project cost of $921,500. This is $255,000 below the
feasibility estimate.
Before spreading the total estimated project costs for assess-
ments, T.I.F. money should be used to pay for many of the extra-
ordinary costs involved in serv ng this project. Council previously
approved the expenditure up to �2,000 for the completion of this
project. Staff has used the methods discussed in the feasibility
report to calculate a justifiable T.I.F. amount, with the result being
$446,900.
The remaining $474,600 must be recapture
fiting properties. The following chart shows
now proposed for each utility versus the rates
bility report.
ITSE�I
Sanitary Sewer
San. Sewer Service
Watermain
Water Service
Storm Sewer
Street Repair
AMODN'P PROPOSED
$4,210/unit
$ 490 each
$2,125/unit
$ 840 each
$ 660 per acre
$ 900
d by assessing the bene-
the rates of assessments
presented in the feasi-
FSASIBILITY
$6,150/unit
-0-
$3,600/unit
-0-
$1,100 per acre
-0-
Resulting Average $8,900 $10,300
Assessment
r 4 •
Note that the new assessment method differentiated the costs to a
greater degree in order to insure fairness.
Commercial properties also will see a substantial cost reduction.
Originally sewer and water were to be assessed at a rate of $8,000 per
acre. Because of the favorable bids, this can now be reduced to
$6,000 per acre.
The resulting overall cost split would look like this:
Amount Assessed $474,600
Amount of T.I.F. $446,900*
TOTAL PROJECT
$991,500
*This number does not include the $18,000 necessary to pay for
assessments to City properties. '
RECOMMENDATION•
Council previously established May 7, 1991 as the date for the
Furlong assessment public hearing. Staff recommends that Council
accept the attached assessment roll and direct staff to mail notice to
those property owners affected advising them of the hearing date and
amount of proposed assessment.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council concurs with the staff recommendation they should pass
a motion accepting the attached assessment roll.
KHE:dfw
AssaSsment P.e�iod
Sanitary Sewer i 19 years
W�termains .-• 7.9 years
Starm Sewers.- 29 years
Streets.- 19 years
INTEREST - $�
FAFCEL REPUTEll OWNER
N0.
27-034{}0- Geroge & Dorothy 6faters
0�0-�B 2341 Hiqhway 55
St. Faul, hiN SS1�0
27-Q3400- State of Minnesota
030-28 1560 Highmay 55
i-id5t3.3'liJSp �'i� �J5{}�'J
27-03�440- EFH Campany
Olp-77 Attentian: Gene Happe
1601 tiighway 13 East
E�urnsville, i�t3 55337
27-04100- Catholic Cemeteries
414-27 244 Dayton Avenue
St. Paul, hiN 55102
27-0410fl- Cathoiic Cemeteries
010-29 24A Daytnn Avenue
St. Paula MN 55302
RSSE38PiENT kfltL
FURLONG ADDTTION & AD��AGEhl7 AREAS
,.3pg Np, 8b16
IMFfiOVEMENT h10. 86. �"ROJECT N0. 4
ADOPTED:
DESCRIFTION
F't ofi,Gnv't Gais 2-3-4 & �
Cam 428.43 Ft S. afi N line &
1002.03 Ft E of W Line af
�.ot 2 S 895.64 Ft to kt�l RR
8e On ft/W 518,13 Ft N
906.67 Ft E].09.3g Ft to
Pt of Gnv't Lots 2& 5 lying
N of LeMay's Re-arr S of
Higheuay & E of 6eo Waters
Property Ex 2.26 Acres Hgwy
Ft a-F NGi il4 of SE 1!4 com
7?b Ft N of SE Cor SW on S
Line Rogers 5t 653 Ft 3E on
F2/W ftgwy 381.5 Ft to hI line
Men Hghts Rd E on Men Hghts
Rd 3I3.22 Ft ta E line NW
Auditors Subdivisian No. .�4
A22 ai l.ot 27
Auditars Subdivision No, 34
All ofi t�ot 29
LOT RL.K. SAhITTAFY SANITARY WATER
N0. 1JQ. SEGffRS SERViGES • hlRItJS
$25,3^c{1.40 b0.00 325,320.04
20.OQ
$O,QQ �3,155,00
ASSESSMENT RATES
Sanitary Sewer -•$4,210.00 per unit
S�tnitary Seri�sce - $490.00 each
Watermai.n.- $2,945.p0 pex unit
Water Service - $840.Qp each
Storm Sewer - $0.015 per square foat
Street Repair - $904.Od ger unit
Cammeroial San. Sewer - $3,000.00/Aare
Commercial Watarmain - $3,40Q.OQjAcre
WATEfi 570kM STREETS T(lTAL
8ERt1ICES SE�1EFi
�a.00 �5,s��.aa $a.00 �sa,�ss.00
$0.00 �685.00 �0.00 �3,8Q0.00
�d.00 b0.00 $O,Od 50.00 $2}2i5.00 50.dt} b^c,.�.I5.d0
0
�O.Oq 50.00 L0.00 50.00 S.'�.,760.00 �0.00 42,7b0.00
SU.44 �0.00 �4.40 �O.fl4 �2,08{}.4d �0.04 �2�084.t}0
• - - --. � ............. _ --.... . ..
. • ;
i .
..�:• ..C;� - • N. � ' � . • '
' i
�:�t � � s. :::
� Z :l,l�:'.�'::."t .
. .S .
•.ti': y::: ..
:f .
jj; .
'r:.�: .
•�[ : . ^:-E-
. . ' . , .. �.t.:i.:
Nj;. j
. s '!:� � . \ . r
ri��4�. ,;{N�' ��}
{: r
. �i ` �
*r�� '`er',,: «' r
.t,.,�.
:.; b
. . , .�'
. . .. .:�.- . .
. ��.
, . ,�. ,
`� . �.�t':�>" � ' �
_�.�
'�� ' .
�,', , .
�a� .
�;o, .. �,. . . • . , . .. .
�:i���' . . . . .
�,: ��
. . '>'IS' ,. . `.PM1:'; ..... ,.. . _. . . . . .
��i ' " . � » ' „ • . . . . " ' ` ' • . . , ' , ..
RA�CE� REPUTEU OwNER DESCRIFTIQN
N0.
27-04100- Catholic Cemeteries Auditors Subdivision No, 34
OSO-39 244 Daytnn Aven�ie All ofi Lot 39
St. Fatiti, �N :5f42 Subiett to Highway Easeme�t
^<•7-04100- Catholic Cemeteries Auditors Subdivision No. �4
014-�2 244 Dayton Avenue All of Lot 42 _
St. Paul, MN 55102 5ub�ect to Highway Easem�nt
�7-4410ti- Catholic Gemeteries Auditor's Sabdivision No. 39
Olp-35 244 Daytan Avenue All ofi Lot 35
, St. Faul. MN 55102
27-04100- �lerome A. Lane Auditor's S�ibdivisinn No. 34
U1].-36 2314 Nighway 5� N 81.5 ft ofi Lat 36
Mendo-ta Fieights, h1F! 55120
27-04240- John L. Neyn Ruditor's Subdivizi.nn No. 34
fll3-3b C376 Highway 55 S 442 Ft af Zot �6
hlendota Neights, MN 5512� .
�7-04100- fionald E. Pfau Auditor's Subdiviszon No. 34
015-36 3142 19th Avenue South E 1 Acre ofi 5 225.4 Ft ofi N
Minneapalis, MN 55407 306.4 Ft afi �ot 36
27-04100- Margaret hl. Perron Auditor's Subdivision No. 34
026-36 23�0 Hiqhway SS S 152 Ft of hi 578.9 Ft of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lot 3b
27-Q4140- zoseph M.�Perron Ruditor's Subdivisian No. 39
017-36 2366 Highway S5 N 120 ft ofi S 272 ft ofi h!
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 579.9 ft of Lnt 36
2�-Q410p- Christopher & dulie Wooisey Auditor's Subdivisian IJo: 34
018-36 2316 Highway S5 W 1 Acre of 6 2 Acres of S
Clertdata t{eights, !�N 55120 225.4 �ft af N 3flb.9 ft af
James A. Marcatte Lnt 36
�OT kLK. SA�ITAFY SANITAkY WATER WATEk STOkM STfiEETS TQTAL
N0. N0. SEWEFS SEFVICE3 MAINS 5EFVICE5 SEWER
�0.00 50.00 �0.00 20.00 5�,240.00 $0.04 ffi3,240.00
�O.Op 50.0� �0.00
�4.44 �4.Oq �4.04
�0.00 $8,680.40 �0.04 �8,684.40
�a.06 �1,f55.00 �fl.60 �1,155.46
24,�10.00 �490.00 �2,125.p0 �840.00 �670.tl0 �0.00 RE3,335.00
�4,214.00 �440.00 �O.OQ �4.Ot� �42{�.Q4 �4.(?4 $:,624.04
5�.00 �0.00 �0.00 $0.04 �225,f7q $0.00 422g,00
34,210.00 �490.00 �0.00 �0,00 �1,550.00 �0.04 �6,250.00
S4.2i0.40 �440.{YO �2,i25.90 �0,04 �1,435.Od �4.04 �£i,260.00
$4,230.OQ �490.Q4 �O.OQ $0.00 �560.00 �0.00 �5�260.00
. . .;�;; , . . . , . . t� . . • , • . .. •. , • • _
st' ��` .
, . ��. . , . � •:�;z•
. . . �, � . .
. �:•;� .
�'i'� .. .. .
'���. .
_ t ` F>,t=_:, . ' ' • . : S�: • , � , .. . ... ?�i' ' ,
,. . ' . . . . . `, . , ' � . • . • " • . � � , ' • �'•�'.' . . • • . . ... . . , . �,. • . `t "'. .,,
FARCE� REFUTEA O�NER DESCRI�TION �OT E�K. SANITARY SA�ITpkY WATER
NU, h10. Nq. SEWERS SERVTCE5 MAINS
.7-04i00- Ranald E. F-F�u Auditor's Subdivis9.on No. 34 �A,2i0.00 �490,00 $2,1^c5.40
015'-36 31R2 19th Ave. S. S 225,4 fit of N 306.9 fit ofi
PilSita9dpOlis� C1N 5S44J �ot 3b Ex E 2 Acres &. Ex
1.13 Acres Hgwy
WATE� STdkM
SERVICE5 SEWER
�0.00 �1,2b5,0p
STREET TQTAL
�0.00 �8,090.00
27-�8�i0p- Narjit $c ftajinder fifadan F�.triongs Additiota 8 1 �7,^c40.00 �48{}.Ot} �7,200,Q0 2840.40 21,�65.p0 �Q.00 517,785.{}0
08q-01 5837 Lyndale pvenue South AI.1 of Lots i thro�.�gh
Minneapalia, Mhl 55419
27-�8400- Me].vin $s Margaret Koppen Furlongs Addi.tion 1 2 �4,210.04 �4y0,00 �2,12g.00
010-02 131b Victory Avenue
St. Paul, �IN 55224
27�-28400- Yih Nsiao Furlongs Addition
d20-{7� 1320 Victary Avenue S.
Mendota Heiqhts, MN 55120
�7-^c8440- Edwa�d & Rita Gaadijohn Furlongs Additiost
OAq-02 � 2220 Highway 5� N 90 Ft of Lot 3, Hlk 2
Mendo#a He3ghts, MN 551�'.4 and all of
27-28900- Edward & Fita Goodijohn Furlongs Addition
p52-42 2220 Highway 55 S 108.4 ft af lot 3 Blk 2
hlendoia Neiqhts, hIN 55120 and all of
27-28400- Lois Fur2ong F'u�^2angs Additian
Ob0-02 2230 Highway �S
hiendota Heights, MN 5512p
27-28400- �'iane T. Furlong Lynch Furlongs Addition
0�0-02 13].3 Furlong Avenue '
Clendota Heights, C!N 5�220
., ,
27-28400- bernar.d M. & Faye T. Riesaener Furlongs Addition
491-Q2 f344 Furlong Avenue All of L.at 8 Blk 2�C W 44
S#. Paul, MN 55120 fi of Lat
27-F8�l04- Alian T. & Agnes kerskow Furlongs Addition
111-02 is05 Furlong Avenue Ex W 20 fit of
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
r+: <'� ;��.: ,.:, : e;:-,
:-` :
c,fi';
�k.
::3.,
�it � �;t; `�'+
.� .
ti"�;
4 . ' ';i .�`r.i�:t:ti� :
'�K. ��4 ���i
.. . . �2: �i.�'.•..Y� !i.:. ,h�;`
� .. . �.!t� . w . � • � . .4�. P�� .r �
� . . - . . . •1.. , . . ' ..
$fi40.00 � �010.00 �9d0.00 49,375.00
2 2 54,210.00 �490.00 �2,125.p0 �440,OQ �180.OQ �900.00 58,745.00
4 2 �0.0t} 24.0� �O.dO $Q.00 �170,00 �4C10.flt7 �1.fl70.{70
5 2 Lq,210.00 �490.00 82,125.00 $840.00 �180.Op �0.00 �7,8q5.00
6 2 #4,214.OQ S44Q.40 �2,125.4Q �840.OQ 5234,04 �9t34,40 �8,?95.04
7 2 $4,21d.00 �490,00 �2,125.00 4fl40.00 #i70.00 �9p0.00 �8,7�5.00
9� 2 S4a210.00
11' E 54,210.Q4
�490.00 527125.q0 , 3840.00 �285.00 5900.Op 58,850.00
8944.OQ �2ai25.04 5840.04 t28�.60 �944.{}4 �8,850.04
S
t-
�R':
t; �,; ,
FAFCEL REFUTEA OWNER DESC�IPTiQN �OT BLK. SANITARY SANITAkY WATEk
NQ. N0. N0, SEWER5 SE�ViCE5 �AiNS
^c7-28400- Alton T, & Agnes &ersh.ow Pttrlongs Addition li 2 54,210.00 �490.Op �2,125,00
112-02 1305 Furlong Rvenue �oi 4 Ex a 44 ft a31 af �ot
Mendota Neights. MN 55120 10 &. W 20 ft afi Lot 11 Ail
in &lk 2.
WATEf: BTOF�1 STR6ETS TO7AL
SERVICES SE�Ek
5840.00 �390,00 �900.00 58,955.00
27-�8400- kobert $ Mary L. Tousignant Furlongs Addition 1 3 �4,210.00 �490.04 �2,125.tl0 �840.00 �510.00 �900.00 �9,U75.00
010-03 13b0 Furlong Ave�ue
Mendota Heights. �N 55120 .
27�28400- Rnbert & Mary L. Tousiqnant Furlong Addition 2 3 $0.00 $O.pO $0,00
0�1-0's 1304 �cerlon� Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN :5120
27-284b0- David &. Carmel Hiner Furiong Additian 3 3 �4.Q0 50.00 54.00
03^c-03 1312 Furlong Avenue
Mendota Heights. MN 55120
P7-28400- David & Carmel Hiner Purlong Addition `4 � 3 �4,210.00 �490.00 �2,125.00
042-03 1�12 Furlong Avenue
Mendota Heights, �N 55120
27-28400- Rzchard �. Daffing Furlongs Addition 7 3 $4�214.40 �494.40 ��.125.44
470-0's I�14 Furlong Avenue Ril o# �ats 5 throuqh
St» Paul, MN 55120
^c7-28444- Dauglas R. & Kathleen Geier Fttr2ongs Addition 9 3 $4,214.00 �490.00 �2,125.00
09p-03 1309 Kendon Lane Al1 ofi Lot 8 Plk 3 and Lot �
Mendot� Heights, MN :5124
27-28400- City of Mendota Heighta Furlongs Addition li 3 54,210.00 �490.Op $2,125.00
114-Q3 2101 Victaria Curve Al1 ofi Lot 10x Rlk 3� �at
Mendata Heights, �N 55118 '
Z7-28440- Connie Deafienbaugfi Furlangs Additian 22 3 50,40 50.00 ��.40
120-03 8115 Ares Circle
Chanhassen, M� 55317
�0,00 - �120.p4 �4.00 �120.00
�O.flfl �f20.06 �0.00 $1�4.00
$840.Q0 �120.00 �900.00 S$,685.00
�840.OQ 5435.44 �900.44 �4,4�4.04
�840.00 �240.Q0 �904.00 4II,805.00
�840.00 �^c40.00 $9q0.00 �$.805.00
50.04 �724.00 �Q.O� �714.0�
� . ' , , , . • , . "' . . .
. '•K �
i:i:�
':5 :
i' �£� .
:{:;.
:�:' 'a
'�i� « .
.2f.•.. ':.;.',`:.,.. :{:
. ��> ilc�
�.i �, '� q ;;�;".
, '6" .
.. '{ . � +ia ,
�'w�' .
. .. �t;'
.•.`�.`
: #:;
. ~.t t 4+, � .
. �y, , . . .
a�� �: !,:
.. , t... , ii��� . .
. . . • . .. . i�y � �, ' � . ' , . . . . � . . ��<•. . � . . . . . , . . .. . .
a
_ . • ;; ... � ..
' ' ' t;"�t, .
. y�; ,
FARCEI � fiEPUTED O�NER DESCRIFTION
ND.
27-c$400- 3ames G. & Mary E. 5chwartz Furlongs Addition
010-04 1486 Kendon Lx�e
Mendota Neiqhts, MN 55120
�7-c^8400- Thamas R. &. Margaret Swansnn Furlongs Addition
034-04 1294 Kendon �ane All af Lat 2 R3k 4 and �ot
St. �au1, M� 55120
2�-28440- fiay l. Hell Fttrlongs Addition
050-04 1298 Kendon Lane Al1 of Lot 4 Hlk 4 and E�0
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 �t of Lat
27-20400- Fichard &. Harriet Sperle Furlongs Addition
060-04 1302 Kendon Lane W �0 f# ofi Lot S Hlk 4 and
St, Fa�tl, �N ;5120 aIl of Lat
^c7-28400- City ofi Mendota Heights Furlongs Addition
086-44 1201 Victoria Curve A21 af �ot 7 Rlk 4� E 30'Ft
Mendota Heights, MN 55118 of Lnt
27-28404- Lavern T. &�.A. Kichgeis Furlangs Addition
09Q�04 1314 Kendon Lane W 30 ft of Lot B Rlk 4 and
St. Faul, MN 55120 all of �ot
27-28400- Loring & Darlene J. �ysne Furlongs Addztion
i1Q-04 1307 lakeview aventte Lat 10 8ubj to Hgwy Esmrtt
St. Paul, �N 55124 and a13 of Lot
2�-28400- kichard & Sara Grier F�rlongs Addition
13Q-04 1303 La�eview Aven�te Ali ofi Got 12 Blk 4 and W
Mendota Meights, MN 55120 40 ft o� Lot
27-28400- Miicheli J& Lisa Lai2ier �urlangs Addition '
131-04 1299 Lakeview Avenue E�st 24 Feet of Lot
Mendota Heigh#s, �N 55120
27-28400- Mitchell J& Lisa Lallier Furlongs Addi#ion
f44-04 2294 Lakeview Rvenue
��ienooia Heights. �N SSi20
. . \
�OT �LK. SANITARY SA�ITAfiY WATER WATEF STOfiM STREETS TOTA�
N0. N0. SEWERS SEFUICES MAINS SEfiUICES SEWEF
1 4 �4,�10.00 �490.00 �2.125.00 �a40.00 4545.04 �900.00 �9,i1d.00
3 4 $4,^c10.00 �490.00 52,125.00 �840.00 ��70,00 �900.00 28,8�5.00
5 4 #4,21�.00 �440.Ob �2,125.00 �$4�.Ofl ��25.Oa �44d.U0 $�.79Q.fl�
6 A S4a210.00 �490.00 $2,125.Oq 5840.00 �245,p0 �900.00 �8,7i0.00
8 Q 54,220.00 �440.00 52,125.40 �840.40 �205.40 �9QQ.04 �8,7�4.fl0
9 4 S4,2i4.Q0 �49d.00 82.125,04 �$40.04 #�45.00 $90Q.00 48,770.40
li 4 �4,�10.40
13 4 �4,�14.04
�490.00 �2,125.00
$494.00 �2.1c^S.OQ
i3 4 SO.Qp 50.00 50.00
�840.00 �275.p0 �900.00 �8,840.00
�8q0.00 �2�5.4p �4fl0.44 58,794.04
$0.00 �45.00 �0.00 �45.00
14 4 54�210.Op 5490,00 32?125.00 3840.00 5155.00 5400.00 �8,720.00
. . . .�J:• .f : ,: .,.:.� ;�.: •
- :r� .. . .--
. . - - .:u.i::i: ':i.f • ;` ti;,,
' :4 ' .,r ,
••y: ,
�'.�h� � . .
�:r:i.'"'C ':K• � , •}
�"�+. - .
.}• . . . .
. . . � ' . ' " .��::kay . '
i,'
..� �
`:1:. :1•. .�V .. . � . 'H� ' . . . . � ` . � . .. .. , ' � .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .
i
� '
i. . . . �{�i.� . .
� • �.
n'i�: `�'.0 �
.h.. � y.
, � �'�'� �
FARCE� REPUTED OWNER DESGRIPTIdN LUT �LK. SANITARY SANITAkY WATEfi WATER STORM STFEETS TO7AL
ND. NQ. NQ. 5EWERS 5ERVICEB MAINS SERUICES 5EWEfi
27-28400- Mitchel2 3&�isa �ailier F�trlangs Addition 15 4 $d.Od #0.00 �0.00 �0.00 534.00 $0.00 �34.00
151-04 1299 Lakeview Avenue 4pt 15, Nik 4 except the East
Mendota NeightsT MN 55120 45 feet of �nt
27-29400- William & 5ally LeClaire Furlongs Addition 16 A ffi4,210.q0 �490.00 ��,125.00 $840.00 �c^35.00 �900.00 �a,800.00
261-04 1295 Lakeview Aven��e E 45 Ft af lot i5 Blk 4&
Mendota Heigfits, MN 55120 �11 of Lot
27-^c8Q44- Miles &. Eleanore Rredvold ��trlongs Addition f7 4 �4,2i0.44 �490,Q0 ��,it5.00
170-d4 1281 tak:eview pvenue Ex the W 150 Ft of Loi
St. Paul, MN 55120
�`7-28400- David B. & Julie Hiil Furlongs Addztion 17 4 $4,210.00 �490.00 �2,125.OP
171-04 1289 Lakeview Avenue W 150 ft of Lot
�endat� Heiqhts. �N 55120
27-28400- Thamas R. Frazier Furlongs Addition 1 5 $4,210,04 �490.00 �2,125.QQ
ti10-Q5 �Tamas N. Frazier
2710 Dale N. �305
ko5eville, MN 55113 '
8840.fl0 �575.Q0 �404.00 �9,190.0�
�840.00 �34g,00 �900.00 �8,910.00
�840.Q4 5384.OQ �9tl4.04 88,945.00
27-28400- Dan1e1 L& Katherine Max Fttrlong� Addition 2 5 54,210.Op �490.00 �2,125.00 �840.00 �135.00 5900.00 $8,700.00
�20-05 1284 Lakviaw Avenue
�endaia Neightss MN 5512Q
27-28400- Mervin & Ida Compton Furlongs Addition 4�$ �qa21Q.04 �44Q,44 �2,1�5.00
044-Q5 i288 �akeview Avenue All af �ots a' &
St. Faula MN 5:120 •
�7-28400- Eliswarth B. &. 3anice Stein Furionga Additio� 5 5 44}216.00 �490.dp $�,i25.Op
050-0$ 129b Lakeview Avenue
St. F'aul, M!J �a51^c0
27-28400- Lambert �'i. Derks Furlonc�s Addition 7 5 Sq,210.00 x490.Oq 52,125.00
�70-0� 1304 Lakeview Avenue All ofi �nt b Eclk 5�nd Lot
Mendoia Heigfits} MN 55120
=7-28440- State o# Minnesaia Furinngs Rddition 4 5 #t}.4Q 50.40
;9.^.-.^..�, i�ov ni.yiii+iay aa fill Ot LO'C 8 El{< 5 dtid LOt .
Hastings, MN 55033
$84Q.00 �27�.04 �40fl.00 �8,83ti.Od
�890.00 �225.00 $900.00 �t1,790.00
,�840.tlp �270.00 $940.00 �8,835.00
S{l.40 50.04 iI.24,Q� $n_nn ai�n�nn
• . . • . ;�� • . . .. ;;,; • : ..
. . . . , . - .. :'�.;'.
, . . . . . . - . „�;.:�: - . . � :{�• .
=K' .
:.tti %. �
. .. { f�y . ' .. . . . r!'�.•.•.
, . . .. n �� . . � .:�:� ; �.:
.. ' . � � . . ` . . . � . :���
. �r . ' :�i'i' i ,'` . .. . .
/ �• ' ' ... ' � .. . ' ` ' ` ' ' ' ' . .. � � ~ � '• •�h1., t. . . � . . . . . ..
FARCEL �REPUTED QWNER DEBCRiPTIQ� LOT �LK. 5ANITARY BRNITR�Y �A7ER WATEK BTDRM STFtEETB T07AL
ND, ND. �0. SEWE�S SEkVICES MATNS SEFVICES SEWER
L�-44@50- Geor4e & Dorothy Wa#ers �eMays �e�rranqement 1 �1,500.OU �490.40 �1,�fl0.40 �4,04 �330.fl0 �O.flO �3,820.04
011-40 2'a41 Highway 55 West 180.11 fieet ofi Lot
Mendoia Heights, M� 55120
27-4q850- George & Dorothy W�ters LeMays Re�rran4ement 2 $3,b60.00 $0,00 $3,66Q.00 �0.00 �804.00 �0.04 �8,i20.a4
02i-00 �341 Highway 55 West 180.11 fieet qf �ot
Mendnt� Heights, M� 55224 ,
27-qqg50- Rronks Inv. Co. 4eMays Rearrangement �14,190.00 �490.00 �14,190.00 �844.00 .�3,090.00 �0.00 ��2,fl00.00
�22-04 8711 lyndaie Avenue Sottih Lots 1� 2 ex W 180.11 ft
Minneapolis, MN 55405 & Ex Ft to hgwy ling E
Basil E& Agness Carter ofi �ine Com Cen Sec 34-28-
23 � along E-� 11A line
609.9b ft thence nn
- azimuth of 320A 20M 58S
2?-52250- Mn Indoor Soccer Arena Northland Plaza 1 2
Oia-4� 43d ist Ave. N#649 .
Minne�po2is, MN 55441 '
27-52F50- Mn indnor Soccer Arena Northland Plaza 2 2
Q�4-02 434 ist Ave. N#649
Minneapolis, MN SSq01
27-5225Q- Mn Indoar 5occer Rrena Northla�d Plaza s �
030-02 430 ist Ave. N#649 .
Min�eapolis, MN 55401
�7-66500- Rrthur E. tk Marzan J. E+ourn 5chouveller Subdiviszon 1--
)10-QO 11B1 Rogers Rnad
Si. Faul, I�N 55124
• . :!,:: .•;;:; .,fi 1
';Ai , . . . � . .
` . ... . . . .�Sew .. . �� " � ".. .
i
�
�0.00
�0.00
SU.Oa
�O.QQ
20.00 50.00
L0.00 50.00
�0.40 50.40
�O.Q9 �O.QO
SO.Od 31a200.00 $4.Op �l,c^QO.Q4
$0.00 �810.00 �0.00 5810.00
�0«40 #835.dd �Q.00 $835.00
�4.44 �254,44 54.40 �^c50.40
`4 ^^ `o ` ,k - .. •� ` . . . , . . ' .., � .. ' . .. ' . . . . �,,, . , .
�iui.; �`;:b:r� • . • .
}t .•`tyjS``•ti•.� . . � � .
FRRCEL REPU7ED DWNER DESCRIPTION LQT B�K. SRNITAkY SANITAkY WATEfi �ATEk STOFM STREETS TOTAL
Np, N0. t�J. SEW�RS SEkVICES MAINS 5EfiVICES SEWER �
27-b6�00- Je�nme & �. Schouveiler Schouvel3er S�;bdivision 2-- ��.06 �fl.Ofl 3ff.0a �0.04 �260.00 �O.Op 9�2b0.04
4ti0-40 2458 NWy 55 .
St. Paul. MN 55118
y7-G654Q- ��erome &. L. Schotiveller Schouveller Szebdivision 3-- �0.00 �4.44 54.6� �fl.4Q S^c?O.Ofl �0.00 ��70.40
030-00 2A58 Hwy 55
St. Pau2. MN 551#8
27-66504- Kenneth �7. &. Mary 5. Gauw 5chnuveller 5ubdiviszon 4-- 50,00 20.00 L0:00 �0.04 ,$280.04 �0.00 $280.00
044-QO 1189 Rogers fioad '
St. Faul, h1N �51L4
?7-66500- City of Mendota Heights Schouveller Suhdivision 6-- �0.00 50,00 $0,00 �0.00 $590.OU 50.00 �F90.00
flbQ-00 2241 Victoria Cur�ve AIl afi Lot 5 a�d F't afi F.o#
Mendota Heights, Mh! 55118 6 Com SE Cor N to NE Car SW - �
1^c5 �t SE to Pt on S Line „
?: Fi St� af E�eg 1� 75 Ft to .
Tieg
2?-bb5{YQ- Gerard �: Doris E�oh2ig Scfiot�veller Subdivision 6 �-- �0.00 �4.00 $0.00 �0.00 �ib6.00 �0.0� �160.00
ab,�-44 2454 Hwy. 55 Pt of Lat 6 Com iJ line 1�5
Mendota Hei.ghts, MN 55120 Ft 5W qfi NE Cor S lOS Ft W
140 F} N 105 Fi E I00 Ft to Beg
�7-66504- Jerome & Lorraine Scho4weller 5chouveller Subdivision 6-- �0.00 'S0.00 �0.00 �0.00 �160.00 �0.00 5160.Q0
)&7-00 2458 Ftwy 55 pt of Lot b Com Se Line 75
St. Paul. MN 55218 ft SW of SE Car Cont SE
Line SW 82.75� Ft ta NE � ,
Boundary 5TH #55 NW pn Hgwy
� 112,6 Ft hl 30 D E 128 Ft SE
98.8 Ft to Reg. �
'?-6&500- Ger�ard & Darfs Fohlig SCFSIIttVEll@P 5ubdivisian b.-- 50.00 f0,04 SO.Od $�.Od �80.00 Z0.44 �80.60
)68-40 2454 Hwy. 55 Pt ofi 4ot b Beg NW Line 225 � -
hlendota Heights, MN 55120 F't SW of NE Cor S 70D bl an
h3i� i.ine 73.73 Ft to !� R!W
5TH #55 5 41D iSM 34S E an
R/W 112.56 Ft N 70A E 2$ Ft
' hi i9ll 3fM 47�a Gi ifl5 Ft to Reg .
. K'. '. i•.:��' .� ..
' • . w ,, `�'S., , .
.. � . ;'� : � . . . : ... ;i3':. , • . . .. � . .. . . c:;i
. F � `.x, .,!
•rij \ j:�{.� ��{i�,}': .. . . ' . . .... . •\{.
' � , • • • r. •. • . . � . ' {� . . :�4;� • � .. . . . . . . .
FAFCEL fiEFUI'ED 041NEk DESCRIPTION LOT bLK. SANITARY SANITARY WATER WATEk STORM STREETS TOTAL
N0. N0. N0. SEWEfiS SERVICES MAINS SEFVICES SEWEfi
27-75200- Robert C. L�rson Taylor Adelia Addition 2 5 5630.00 �0.00 $630.00 80.00 5140.00 50.00 $1.400.00
020-OS 2160 Highway 5$ Lot 1, Blk 5 and Lot �
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27-7g200- Robert C. Larson Taylor Adelia Addition i ,5 �960:00 �0.00 $960.00 �0.00 $210.00 50.00 �2,130.00
050-OS 2160 Highway 55 Lots 3 thru S, Blk 5
Mendota Heiqhts, MN 55120
27-75200- Robert C. Larson T�ylor Adelia Addition 7 5 �G30.00 �0.00 $6�0.00 $0.00 �140.00 50.00 g1,400.00
070-05 ^c160 Hiqhway 55 Lot 6, B1F: 5 and Lot �
Mendota Heights, MN $51^c0 �
27-75200- Fobert C. Larso� Taylor Adelia Addition 11 5 51,500.00 $490.00 $1,500.00 5890.00 �32Sti00 g0.00 �9,65,5.00
110-05 2160 Highway 55 Sub to Hgwy Esmnt & all of .
Mendota Heights, MN g5120 Lots 8 thru �
27-75200- Robert C. Larson Taylor Adelia Addition 16 5 51,290.00 $0.00 $1,�90.00 $0.00 �275.00 �0.00 52,855.00
160-05 2160 Highway 5g Sub to Ngwy Esmnt & all of � �
Mendota Heights, MN g5120 Lots 12 to ,
�7-75200- Robert C. Larson Taylor Adelia Addition 38 5 �990,00 �0.00 5994.00 �0.00 5215.00 $0.00 $2.195.00
380-05 �160 Highway 55 Sub ta Hgwy Esmnt � all ofi �
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lots 34 to "�
27-75200- Ro6ert C. Larson Taylor Adelia Addition 42 5 5720.00 50.00 5720.00 50.00 �155.00 �0.00 21,5g5,00
420-05 2160 Hiqhway 55 Sub to Hgwy Esmnt & Ex N 70 �
�endota Heights, MN 55120 Ft Lots 39 thru
^c7-75200- Robert C. Larson Taylor Adelia Addition 42 5 L780.00 $0.00 5780.00 20.00 �170.00 50.00 �1,730.00
421-05 2160 Highway 55 N 70 fit of Lots 39 thru
Mendota Heiqhts, MN 551^c0 �
� . .. . . ;g. �. • .
• . . • ��i _ . . .
\ . .
i �
� .
, • . . .. . � 'S:R:.';=i:;,.,,�'�;b: ':t:. ,i; ' . . , , ' . j . . . , . . , . „
. '�' : �.� . . . . . . .
. . . . ':tii : � . : �".' • . � , � ' . . • �'�' - ':��' , , -`::
� , , . .. . ••- . •' •5,.�{' • 'i{ij.•� ,. •
�
TO:
FROM:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
Mayor, City Council and City
Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr.,
April 11, 1991
Adminis�����1��i --
Treasurer �
5UBJECT: United Properties - Lennox Property - Tax Increment
Financing
HISTORY
United Properties, during the past year, has proposed two
projects in the MAC Property area which were approved by Council to
receive Tax Increment assistance (Aero Systems and FiServ).
Neither project has yet proceeded.
At this time, United Properties has a Letter of Intent from
Lennox Industries to construct an office warehouse building on the
MAC Property. Lennox Industries is a major, nationally recognized
corporation, headquartered in Texas, which produces and distributes
heating and air conditioning equipment. The project consists of a
30,000 square foot office/'warehouse building� (approximately 8,000
square feet� office and 22,000 square feet warehouse) which will
serve as the regional sales and distribution facility for Lennox.
No manufacturing operations are envisioned as part of this
facility. Mr. Dale Glowa of United Properties will be present at
the April 16th meeting, and further information regarding the
proposed building design will be presented at that time.
Similar to the two previous projects, United has asked for Tax
Increment assistance to complete the transaction. The Lennox
project would require approximately $160,000 of pay-as-you-go
financing along with about $265,000 of up front write downs. The
District has on hand sufficient funds to finance the up front
costs, and the projected tax receipts over the fourteen years of
collection will be adequate to service the pay-as-you-go note.
The proposed proj ect will be located on the west side of Pilot
Knob Road, across from Big Wheel. As part of the project, United
Properties will petition for construction of a segment of the road
west of Pilot Knob Road as well as utilities and storm sewer for
the site. These would be constructed under City contract and
assessed to the property. (In reality, the Tax Increment District
would pay for their improvement as a credit against the up front
costs of the project). �
Lennox proposes to occupy the facility in February 1992.
Because United does not intend to begin project construction until
late summer, formal consideration of building permit issuance will
not be proposed for several more months. However, as a condition
of the Lennox Letter of Intent, United is obligated to, within 30
days, request from the City the appropriate Tax Increment
assistance. Thus, the only action being considered tonight is
authorization to participate in the project with Tax Increment
Financing.
ACTION REOUIRED
Discuss the project details with Mr. Glowa, and consider
authorization of City Tax Increment participation.
LES:kkb
��
t�
. f . ..
UNITED PF�OPERTIES
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
March 18, 1991
Mr. Larry Schaughnessy
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: LENNOX Industries, Inc.
• Mendota Heights Business Park (Acacia)
Dear Larry:
United Properties Development Company requests City approval for
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) support for the above referenced
project in the form of up front cost write-downs and a
"Pay-As-You-Go" benefit totaling $425,000. As you know, the
"Pay-As-You-Go" benefit is secured by a limited revenue note
between the City and the owner. We request receiving a
"Pay-As-You-Go" benefit over the remaining term of the tax
increment district for this project. We estimate the net present
value of the "Pay-As-You-Go" benefit over•the remaining life of
the district to be approximately $160,000. This assumes a 30,000
square foot building generating $1.50 per square foot of real
estate taxes when fully assessed. I have attached a schedule
prepared by Publicorp, bond consultants, calculating the
"Pay-As-You-Go" benefits over the remaining TIF District term.
The balance of TIF support, $265,000, will be paid up front as
cost write-downs.
At your request, I h�ve prepared the schedule below outlining
estimated project costs which are allowable tax increment
write-downs. The land write-down represents the difference
between the current market value and our original purchase price.
5�6,
Acoustical Building Materials: $170,000 �� a
Land Write-down:
Site Work:
Tree Removal
Grading
Utilities
Curb and Gutter
Paving
Sidewalks
Engineering Costs
TOTAL
�
- / � a -1�-p. —
3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 (612) 831-1000
165, 000 Ft�"!'
1 u�f�ss'{'�'��
� 5,000
20,000
15,000
5,000
30,000 ��
5,000
10,000
$425,000
Mr. Larry Schaughnessy
March 18, 1991
Page 2
As you know, the real estate market has slawed to a near
standstill, In order to be competitive with existing pro"perties,
we had to offer LENNOX the TI� support. We respect£ully request
Ci�y Council approval.
Siz� erelyr
`�.�,'t/ /�f�?,C.'------�
l�
Da e J . I�wa
Senior ice Presiden�.
DJG/jas
Attachment
�
�
R �
v �
Feb-91
city of Hendota Heights: lennox industrfea
�
UN1TE0 PROPERTIES
flacion Rate �.00OOX Class Rate • C/I Property 4.954X Pay 93
osent Yalue Rate 10.5000h 'Assunes no thanges in class f8C6S over tife of district
ecal Disparitiee 40.00OOX
x fxtensfon Rate - Hendota Retghts: 87.3960X Gey 1990
ProjeCt Tax Capecity 51,490
vage 1
,000 sq.ft. D S1.50/rq.ft. � Taxes of 545,000
Base Harket Value 100,000 <-Eetimete
ojoct Market Yelue Sase Tax Cepatfty 4,954
latxl/Bullding 51,039,358 Pay 93
�wK�R*Mwk#iit��*MMwh�Xfi*ikk*i#�k}*�kxMx*#kRM**�*k*i*ttitt#k}w*«tAR�**kikk�tii�kiik*�tkRf�*MRMRkk�Ni*rt*if*A�irrf►wMMF***A�wwk
Bose ProJect CapYured Semi-Rnnual LeeG flecat Less Adm{n semi-Annua[ "
PROM: 7ax Tex iax Annual Tax DSsperSt{es Paymcnt uet Tax T0: '�
rs. Nth. Yr. Capacity Capacity Cepacity 7axes Inc1^ement GO.00X 5.00% Increment Trs. Mth. Tr. T
---------------------------------------•----------------...---------------�---...--------------------------------------••--*
0.0 U2-02 1991 4,qg4 4,954 0 4,330 0 0 0 ( 0\ 0.5 08-01 1991 '�
0.5 08-02 1991 4,95G 4,954 0 4,330 0 0 0 0 � l.0 02•O1 1992 *
1.8 02-02 1992 G,954 4,954 0 4,330 U 0 0. 0 1 7.5 08-01 1992 "
1.5 08-02 1992 4,954 4,954 0 4,330 0 0 0'� D' 2.0 02-01 1993 '`
2.0 02-02 1493 4,954 51,490 G6,5'S5 45,000 20,335 8,134 610 _ 11,591�. 2.5 OS-01 199'S '
2.5 08-02 1943 4,954 51,440 46,536 45,000 20,�35 8,134 610 �'• 11,591% 3.0 02-01 1994 "
'�.0 02-02 1994 4,454 53,634 48,080 46,350 21,010 8,L04 630 � 1t,976 3.5 OS-01 19,4 *
3.5 08-02 7944 4,954 53,034 48,OB0 4b,�50 21,010 8,404 630 ' 11,976� 4.0 02•Ol 1495 *
4.0 02-02 1995 4,954 54,625 49,bTS 47,741 21,i05 8�682 651 12,372 4.5 08-01 19P5 *
4.5 08•02 1995 4,�4 54,625 49,671 47,7G1 21,705 8,682 65'1 '�' 72�372 � 5.0 02•O1 1996 *
5.0 02-02 1996 4,954 56�264 51,310 49,1T3 22,422 8,969 673 1Z,7801 5.5 08-01 1996 '�
5.5 08-02 1996 4,954 56,264 51,510 49�t73 22,422 8,959 6T.I ��• 12,780 1 6.0 02-01 1497 �
6.0 02-02 7947 �,954 57,952 52,998 50,64B 23,159 9,264 69S ,� 13,207 6.5 OS-Oi 1947 *
6.5 08-02 149T 4,954 57,952 52,998 50,1>48 Z3,159 9,264 69S • i3,204� 7.0 02-01 1998 x
7.0 02-02 1998 4,954 59,69T 54,737 52,167 23,919 9,568 7l8 � 13,634 7.5 08-01 1948 �
7.S 08-02 1948 4,954 54,641 54,737 SZ,1b7 23,4i9 9,568 718 �' 13,b34� 8,0 02•07 1999 *
8.0 02-02 1994 4,954 61,4$1 55,527 53,732 24,701 4,881 741 ` 14,030� 8.5 08•07 199"r *
6.5 08-02 7999 4,954 61,481 5b,527 53,132 24,701 9,881 741 �-74,080% 9.0 02-01 Z000 �
9.� 02-02 2000 4,954 63,326 58,'S72 55,344 25,507 10,203 765 94,539 � 9.5 08-07 200Q �
9.5 08-02 Z000 4,954 63,326 58,3i2 55,344 25,507 10,203 765 ��t"14,539� 10.0 02-01 2001 '
0,0 02-OZ 2001 4,95k 65,2Z6 60,272 57,0�5 26,338 10,535 790 15,012 10.5 OS-o1 2001 '�
0.5 OB-02 2001 �,954 b5,226 60,272 S7,005 26,338 10,535 790 15,012� 11,0 02-01 2002 *'
1.0 02-02 2002 4,954 67,182 62,228 58,715 27,193 10,677 8i6 15,500l 11.5 08•0� 2002 R
1.5 08-02 2002 4,954 67,182 62,228 58,715 27,193 10,877 816 1$,500/ 12.0 02•Ot 2003 `
2.0 02-02 2003 4,954 64�198 64,244 60,476 28,0T3 11,229 $42 16,0021 12.5 08-01 20D3 '�
2.5 OS•02 2003 4,954 69,198 64,244 60,476 28,073 11,229 842 16,002/ 13.0 02-01 2004 "
S.0 02-OZ 2004 4,954 T1,2T4 66,320 62,291 28,980 11,592 E69 16,5191 13.5 08-01 200G *
3.5 08-02 2004 4,954 71,274 66,320 62,291 28,980 11,592 869 16,519/ 14.0 02•O1 2005 "
4.0 02-02 2005 4,954 73,412 68,458 64,159 29,915 11,96b $97 17,0511 74.5 06-01 2005 x
4.5 OS-OZ 2005 4,954 T3,412 68,458 64,159 29,915 11,966 897 77,051� 15.0 02•01 20D6 �
S�0 02•0: 2006 4�954 75,614 � 70,669 fib�084 30�8T7 12�351 426 17�600 \ 15,5 08-01 2006 `�
5.5 08-02 2006 G,95� 75,614 70,660 66,084 30,87i 12,351 926 17,G00 � 16.0 02-01 200T ' �
6.0 02-p2 2007 T7,883 77,883 0 68,067 U 0 0 0 16.5 OS-01 2007 •
6.5 OS•02 2007 77,883 7T,883 0 66,067 0 0 0 0 17,0 02-01 2009 "
.a:Y:seeebao�a:srr:c_=e_=aove�eest:eae= =ococrssr::=e_======ca�c_atereste======ozroeec:aeee=========oo'�o-ro�:ae==n_a==^voco*
'` . Totels 708,270 263,308 21,248 403,714 `
�_=====ce=scr:a�e========^o�vcrseensast==v=oazsrr+cz�een========='oe=ccSs'L!E"=�=cc=co�avrairs=aeen•
* Present Values Z83,693 113,477 F1,;11 161,705 � '
twft}Yr1�k�kfc*irrtirtrt�rxykfYrRitYrl.f.ti�rrrwwR�/!Y�kiri.�x*if�ft<rta�►�R�M;f.wsFi.i�rrk.rkik �R��.*�k{,}hRatRittTtf[t
. �
�
:00•04 Prepared by Publicorp ]n�. . ...,, LcN�Ca
. ,� /
l y
f ?
pg.p�b.QZ ` City of MerKlota NeiQhts: �ennax tsxiustrie8 P�9� 2
, '
Limited Revenue Nate - fft: To Daveloper
►h1t*1�hfk+ttfkwtitlt/t'�frWf4Mi�iki�yrkRMrlrNf*1��iii�iatrt7tR'h*�Fkk�Aiik�kf�FMrkirA��kM�**ii�titk�kMkkllkk*irti w t}MhRkMNlkkflirtitirtR*�t1�RfrNYt+kYr**ttkR�kkk1� d �r�
* , fROM: Beg. AGcrued Princip�t interest Totai Erxf t0: �' Peyrr�ent *
" Yra, Hih. Yr. 8atance InYerest �ayenent Payment Peyment Batance Kth. Yr. * bate *
711riMtiri*}'ttif#A'kktlkkii/tANfilf7�RtkkY�tkf#kltkRflAlrh**#k*1�'ifkMtltRKfYir*4lfkttktfMCR*1tk�r'k�i'k�t�Ffi�t'I�RhRkrikitk�ir*iif*K*K**Ytkil41k1tl�#krtl� *dA'fik'iri**�ki#}ttxR
" 0.5 Q2-Q2 i49i ]61,745 8r49Q 4 Q 0 17D,1F4 Q$-01 1941 " *
* 1.0 o8•OZ 1991 170,194 8,435 0 0 0 174,130 42•01 1992 * �
� 1.5 02•02 1992 1T4,130 4,444 0 0 0 1$8,534 08-Ot 1992 " *
'" 2.0 0$-02 1992 188,534 4,898 0 0 p 198,G32 OZ-01 1943 * "
" 2.5 02-02 1943 198,�32 � , 1,173 10,41$ 11,59t 197,259 48,�01 1993 rt 0$-01 1993 k
* 3.0 d8-Ol 194� 19T,259 0 9,235 10,356 11,54i i96,024 02�Oi 199G " 02-Ot 1944 �`
k 3.5 02-U2 2994 i96,024 Q S,b85 fp,29i "t1,97b 19�,339 d8-D1 1944 * 0$-OS 1994 *
* 4.0 4s-o2 t494 i44,334 a y,773 10,20� �3,97b 942,56b 02-03 l495 * 02-D1 �995 �
� 4.5 02-R2 1495� 'l42J566 0 2,2bZ 'l0,71Q 12,�72 14Qr304 08•07 1445 * QH-Oi 3445 *
� S.0 08-02 1995 994,304 0 2.381 9,491 12,3T2 187,F22 02-Q1 449d "� 02-0'! 1996 '`
� 5.5 02•02 1996 187�922 0 2,914 4,8b6 12,780 1$S,OCB OB•01 i99t5 � OS•01 7496 *
� 6.0 OB-02 1996 185,008 0 3,ObT 9,713 12,780 1$1,941 OZ-01 ' 1997 � 02-01 1497 "
� b.5 02-02 1947 181,941 0 3,649 9,552 i3,207 178,29Z OS-01 1997 � OB-Ot 1997 K
' T.0 08•02 i94T 178�242 0 3,8�0 9,3d9 t3,2o1 174,G51 02-01 i498 * b2-01 1998 "
T.5 02•02 1948 ST4,d5'4 0 4,475 4,154 i3,b34 169,97b 0$-Oi 9998 '� 0$-01 'i99$ *
8.0 OS-Q2 1448 4b4,976 0 4,714 8,424 i3,634 1b5,2bb 02-Dt 1944 * 02-D1 1444 *
� 8.5 QZ•Q2 945�l4 ib5,2bb 0 5,4D� 8,b75 14,480 154,Sb3 08•Ot 1499 * 08-t►1 1949 "
' 4.0 08-02 1499 159+8fi3 0 5�687 8r393 14r084 i56,176 02-01 200Q " Q�u-01 24Q4 "
9.5 02-02 20p0 154,176 0 6,445 6,094 14,5�4 14T,731 08•Oi ZOpO k 08-Ot 2000 k
10.0 08-02 20Q0 14T,731 0� b,783 7,75b 14,539 1GQ,948 02-01 2001 * 02-01 2001 "'
10.5 02•d2 200i 140,948 0 7,673 T,4Qp 15,012 133,335 08-Ot 2001 * OB-0'1 2001 "
' tS.O 08•a2 20pf 133,335 0 $,Oi2 7,d�J0 15,Ot2 725,323 02•O1 2002 * 02-01 Z002 "
11.5 DF-02 2002 1i5,323 d 8,9�0 6,579 15,600 416,�iO3 OS•01 2D02 " 08-09 2002 *
1Z.0 08-02 2002 'li6,403 , � 0 9,384 b,11i 't5,500 107,Q1� o2-01 ZOA3 * 02-0# 20�� �'
12.5 Q2-02 20b3 107,014 Q i0,�84 5,6l8 16,QQ2 9b,634 08-Ot 2003 * fl8-41 2003 *
1�.0 0$-02 ZOQ3 46jfi�0 p 10r929 5r473 l6�Q02 85+702 02-Q] 2Q04 w 02-01 20Q4 �
13.5 02-02 2004 85,702 0 12,0z0 4,494 16,519 73,682 08�01 2004 * 09-09 2004 �
14.0 OS•02 2004 73,682 0 12,651 3,868 16,519 61,032 02-01 2005 * �2-01 2005 "
14.5 02-02 2p05 61,032 0 13,847 3,204 17,051 47,184 OS-01 20D5 k 08-01 2005 �
i5.0 OB-O2 2405 47,t84 4 94,5i4 2,G7T �7,051 32,6i0 02-A1 2006 * 02-a1 2006 �
15.5 Q2-02 20II6 32,bS0 0 i5,888 5,772 17,6�0 tb,722 4$-01 2006 " OS-Oi 200b *
16.Q 0$•D2 2006 96j7�2 0 1d,722 878 97,64t1 0 02-01 20fl7 *' 02•01 2007 *
16.5 42-02 2007 p Q t4) 0 4 0 08•Ct1 200? * OB-Ot 2007 *
i7.0 t18-02 20p7 0 0 t0? Q . 0 0 Q2-Q1 2Q08 * 02-01 2008 �
•tMkR M/nFYr'kA'kMRRRk4ft��kik7kRM kRflNk*tirtk#**1tf('RMX1k*M1r!*tkkRM'h llkfk'�kiFt4dr*Yrt/ttir�tNkwit*�hit*�irxf� kfiRlrkiYr�kkktttFRR11 kk*fF�k�irlttrtKlc«RKkk�tYrlr*k+kKkKttRkkfF*�ki##
* 3b,727 148,432 20St282 403,714 *
fF*14i**tf�ltlrkWir*k�lrtrtktR* kk*iir�+k�rfre*MrR* kw�M�rYr:#t+t
'10�-Q4 Prepareti b}' Publicorp lnc. LENt�QX
:. �
CITY OF MENDOTA IiEIGHTB
MEMO
April 12, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis rt�'�r
FROM: John P. Maczko
Fire Chief '
SUBJECT: Annual Fire Report
Attached is the Annual Fire Report for 1990. As you will
discover the report demonstrates the commitment of the
department, citizens and businesses to fire safety. For your
review this report is very detailed. A summary will be
distributed to the all households in late summer in conjunction
with the sale of The Firemens Ball dance tickets. The summary
report is being done to inform the citizens and thank them for
their support and participation in keeping their City fire safe.
I will be attending the Council meeting on Tuesday to answer
any questions that you may have regarding this report.
JPM: dfw
0
City o�
1Viendota Heights
��� � � �� ������� � 1���
� �� ������ �
� � � � �� � ��� ��� � ��
. Subtnitted 6y :
�"L�,� C�-G'L��'
John Maczko
�.��'L�?�1N? C�L'1.��'
Bill Lerbs
�'L�2.� T'��1�.��-G�7.L
Paul Kaiser
rG�rc���.s a� �r�t� �����.�rrG��r�
April 16, 1991
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1VIN • 55118 452 • 1850
7��r�� o� co�r7��r7s
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
SECTION 5.
SECTION 6.
SECTION 7.
SECTION 8.
SECTION 9
SECTION 10
SECTION 11
SECTION 12
SECTION 13
Synopsis of 1990 Operation
Looking Forward To 1991
Fire Alarms
Fire Loss Summary
Work Performed
Budget and Income Summary
Situations Found
Run Breakdown by Time of Day
Manpower Response
Method of Alerting Department
Response Time Statistics
Fire Causes
Actions Taken by Department
SECTION 1
SYNOPSIS OF 1990 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATION3
FIRE RELATED DEATHS AND INJURIES
We are happy to report that during 1990 that there were no
fire related deaths.
Unfortunately we do report that there were three (3)
firefighter injuries, the most serious of whi�h was a knee injury
while fighting a grass fire in the river bottoms. The other two
(2) injuries were minor being smoke inhalation.
Overall firefighters responded to 247 calls this year and
took part in over 2100 hours of training without any other
serious injuries or loss of life to the citizens of Mendota
Heights or any other of our contract areas that we service.
PROPERTY DAMAGE
During 1990 we are happy to report that the total-fire loss
to real estate and contents was listed at $21,250, this amounts
to approximately $2.11 per capita in dollar loss. This compares
very favorably to the national average of $29.30 per capita.
NUMBER OF FIRE CALLS - IIP BLIGHTLY
During
assistance.
made in 1989
responded to
TRENDS
1990 the fire department responded to 247 calls for
This is up slightly when compared to the 221 calls
but still lower than the 284 calls that were
in 1988 and 1987.
In past reports under this heading, we have addressed trends
and percent increases. Section 7 shows a detailed percentage of
actual activity that the department responded to. The number of
actual fires continues to drop and in 1990 made up only 19.4� of
the actual run volume of the department responses. Medical calls
resulted in 27� of the responses, up slightly over 1989.
Hazardous situations were 3.2� of the calls;•False Alarms
accounted for 38� of the calls; Good Intent made up 10� of the
calls, all of which were down slightly from 1989. Mutual Aid
calls made up 2� of the calls. The overall trend for the fire
department seems to be that run volume is stabilizing or even
slightly decreasing. I think this speaks highly of the Fire
Prevention Program, the Fire Inspection Program and the effort
that is being put forth by the citizens and businesses of our
protection area that keep fire hazards down. Again, with the
amount of development that has been going on in the City of
Mendota Heights over the last 5-10 years it really is a great
triumph to see the number of calls stabilizing and decreasing.
MANPOWER RESPONSE
As in past years we have continued to monitor manpower
response during three classifications of calls for assistance,
weekday, weeknight and weekend calls. During 1990 the average
response to weekday calls were 12.5, weeknight - 21.1, and
weekend calls - 17.6. Records continue to show that on the
average call we have adequate manpower responding to provide the
necessary service. We continue to recruit for daytime
firefighters and continue to utilize Mutual Aid if needed.
Compared to other volunteer fire departments Qur personnel
response seems to be comparable to better during weekdays.
RESPONSE TIME
A quick and safe response to fire emergencies is very
important, the sooner we get manpower and apparatus on the scene
to attack the fire the less serious the fire will be. Response
time is also a concern in other emergencies that the department
is requested at. In 1990 we report an average response time of
6.33 minutes, this includes responses within the city and our
contract areas. This response time represents the time beginning
when the dispatcher receives the initial call for help until the
first piece of fire apparatus reaches the scene. Thi's response
time has continued its downward trend. Response to all emergency
calls within the City of Mendota Heights proper was 5.9 minutes.
It should also be noted that in addition to the documented
respectable response time of 6.33 minutes, we actually have
quicker response in �ost cases. The dispatcher does not know
when individual firefighteYs arrive on the scene only when the
first piece of fire apparatus reaches the scene. Because of the
way our personnel responds we usually have a firefighter or two
on the scene within 3.5 - 4.0 minutes. First firefighters on the
scene provide a crucial function in evaluating the situation and
assessing a plan of attack, if there is a fire.
DEPARTMENT COMPLEMENT
The fire department interviewed and appointed four (4)
probationary firefighters in August of 1990. They were David
Dreelan, Mark Kaufmann, Walt Klarkowski and Roy Kingsley. One
member retired on December 31, 1990, that member being Lambert
Derks with 23 years of service. Overall, the department
complement concluded 1990 with 32 active members, 2 members on
leave and two open positions.
FIRE MARSHAL�S REPORT
During 1990, 842 hours were logged by Fire Marshall Paul
Kaiser. Of these 842 hours, 300 hours were spent on
administrative duties which include recordkeeping, letter
writing, code research, plan review, reports, responding to
miscellaneous inquiries or other miscellaneous duties. 446 hours
were spent on field inspection or re-inspection, 20 hours on
�
pre-plan updates, 71.5 hours meeting with architects, code
enforcement personnel and the state fire marshal office and 4.5
hours on fire investigations.
The department,
pre-planned all 192
Heights. This was a
worthwhile. Much ne
design, contents and
is provided. The pz
with the exception c
computerized by the
TRAINING
through Paul Kaiser's assistance, has now
businesses within the City of Mendota
very long and intensive program but very
eded information about the building, building
any other related firefighting information
e-plan itself is currently all computerized
f the floor plans and we �ope to have those
end of 1991.
With the world changing as fast as it is this day and age,
the fire department continues to devote much of its time and
energy on training fire personnel in proper procedures and
tactics for fighting fires, hazardous material incidents, natural
disasters and other emergencies that the department may be asked
to respond to. This training is absolutely crucial for the
protection and safety of all our firefighting personnel and the
protection of the public. In 1990 firefighters participated in
over 2100 man hours of in-house fire training. Examples of the
training included pre-planning by on-site tour of Mendota Heights
Animal Hospital, Lloyds Meat Products, and Eco-Lab. For the
second consecutive year, a large water flow drill was undertaken
at the Northern States Power L.P. Gas Facility on Highway 13 and
Farmdale Road. Map work and driving skills were improved with an
exercise in city maps and•also our first truck driving rodeo.
Al1 firefighter attended a two hour class presented by N.S.P.
involving electricity and firefighter safety, and completed a
six-part instructional program on fire attack. There was
discussion of strategy and tactics used on the fire at the Inver
Hills Community College in April of 1990. We held live fire
drills at two City owned houses on Highway 55. Besides smoke and
fire drills firefighters received training in tanker operations,
ventilation techniques on the structures, the use of Self
Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA), ladders, relay pumping,
drafting, standpipes, hoisting tools and equipment, heavy rescue
operations, studied fire streams, large fires and flashover.
Thirty-two (32) firefighters have now been through the 72 hour
Firefighter I Course through the Vocational/Technical Institute
and sixteen (16) firefighters have been through the 40 hour First
Responder and Refresher Course. The chief, assistant chief and
fire marshal also attended a 40 hour class on hazardous materials
training and the training coordinator attended an 8 hour workshop
on firefighter safety and survival. Firefighters also
participated in many outside the station fire schools, such as
Minnesota State Fire School, Sectional Schools, Flammable Liquid
Fire Instruction at Koch Refinery, Hazardous Materials classes in
Bloomington, State Conferences and the through Vo-Tech system,
classes on the driver compartment air bags that may be hazardous
to firefighter safety. Probably the most significant thing was
that in cooperation with the Minnesota
Association and the State Certification
firefighters were certified to Level II
f iref ighters were certif ied to Level I.
EQUIPMENT
State Fire Chiefs
Board, twenty (20)
and thirteen (13)
In 1990 the fire department spent most its time writing
specifications for a new Equipment/Command Vehicle to replace our
existing rescue truck. Much time, research,.energy, and
exploration was spent by the truck committee pommissioned to
study the purchase of this apparatus. Through their efforts we
are confident that we will get another ��state�of the art�� piece
of equipment. The contract was awarded in late December to Road
Rescue for the completion of this unit to be delivered sometime
in June 1991.
PIIBLIC RELATIONS
The department hosted its fifth annual Fire Prevention Open
House during Fire Prevention Week in 1990. This open house
included many demonstrations including a N.S.P. demonstration on
power line safety, the actual extinguishment of a vehicle fire,
and an explanation of how the department works in attacking a
fire, and an air rescue helicopter was actually brought in for
observation. Plenty of movies and information were available for
the parents. Again, we felt that the Fire Prevention Open House
was very well received and the people enjoyed the opportunity to
come and meet fire personnel, see the station, and participate in
the activities. The department was very active on fire
prevention activities within the schools and daycare facilities
in the area. Overall we estimate that the department covered and
talked with every elementary-aged child within the two elementary
schools in the city. It was our second year of having ��Lunch
With a Firefighter" in which firefighters were available for
lunch at the two elementary schools for regular school lunch
encouraging questions and answering them.
Over 450 hours were officially logged for fire prevention
activities but much more time was spent donated by the
firefighters. One of the biggest additions to our fire
prevention activities was a robotic robot called ��Pluggien.
Pluggie was purchased through donations from the VFW and was a
very big hit during our Fire Prevention functions. Pluggie has
proved that he will be a very major part of our fire prevention
activities.
We continue to feel that fire prevention is one of the most
worthwhile functions of the fire department and a very
instrumental part of jobs. We would much rather prevent fires
than fight fires. It has been very gratifying to see the
response that citizens of Mendota Heights and the businesses have
shown in fire prevention activities and we pl�an on continuing
these activities and expanding into the future.
SYNOPSIS OF MAJOR CALLS
January 7, 1990 - The department was called to a person that had
fallen in the Ivy Falls area. Upon our arrival we were led to
the victim who had fallen 75 feet over the icy falls to the ice
below. Due to very slippery conditions a rescue from that area
was very difficult. The victim was stable when he was placed in
the ambulance and was very lucky considering the fall that he
took.
February 28, 1990 - The fire department responded to a Mutual Aid
Request to the City of Inver Grove Heights at Inver Hills
Community College. Our department responded with six other
departments to fight the stubborn fire that was in the roof.
Preliminary damage estimate is over 2 million dollars. Crews
from Mendota Heights stood by at our station, Inver Grove Heights
Fire Station, and also responded to the scene to relieve
personnel on a rotation basis. The department was awarded a'
Certificate of Commendation by the Governor for our help in
extinguishing this stubborn fire.
May 4, 1990 - The department was called to a grass fire in the
area just north of 494 and sent three of our firefighters to the
hospital. Two with knee problems and one with smoke inhalation.
Because of the location it was decided to let the fire burn and
to try and control the spread with a back fire. It was during
this back fire process that two of the firefighters were injured.
One of them had fallen into a large hole and dislocated his knee.
The firefighter with smoke inhalation was assisting this
firefighter out of the fire area. The other knee injury turned
out to be bruise from a fall.
May 23, 1990 - The department resporided to a call at Jose�s
American Grill to extinguish a grease fire. Upon arrival the
first in Engine noted smoke and flame visible on the roof. The
fire was contained quickly to the ventilation system and stove
area. Highway 13 was blocked for about 20 minutes during the
initial attack. The automatic fire protection system did
activate. Damage was estimated at $2200.
July 4, 1990 - The department was dispatched to respond to a
kitchen fire at 1824 Valley Curve. The homeowner and his wife
were asleep when they woke up to the smell of smoke. Smoke
detector batteries were present however the batteries were dead
and never did sound. A neighbor was able to knock the fire down
with a fire extinguisher and prevent the fire from getting out of
control. Damage was estimated at $5,000 with $4,800 to contents
and $200 to the structure. The cause of the fire was listed as
spontaneous combustion from oily rags.
July 22, 1990 - The department was dispatched to a kitchen fire
at 1254 Culligan Avenue, however the fire was out upon arrival.
Damage was estimated at $100. Cause of the fire was determined
to be newspapers close to an unattended stove which ignited and
burned itself out. As a side note the owners children were home
at the time and followed the proper procedures by calling 911
from a neighbor's home. This was enlightening to hear because
the children did an excellent job in practicing what they had
learned.
July 28, 1990 - A severe storm with very heavy rains had just
gone through the area and the department was responding to
another call at the north end of the City, when we received a
call of a structure fire at 2236 Bent Tree Lane. Upon arrival of
the first truck on the scene flames were noted and visible coming
out of the attic area at the peak of the roof'. The department
was able to quickly contain the fire to the attic area with
minimum water damage. Due to the heavy charring to the
structural members of the roof framing and smoke damage produced
an estimated dollar loss of $15,000, with $10,000 being to the
structure. Cause was determined to be lightning strike.
The storm did keep us busy on another call of power lines down
and a accident with injuries that required extrication at Dodd
Road and Highway 110. Due to the fact that the department was
involved with the structure fire we requested and received mutual
aid from West St. Paul
August 28, 1990 - The department was dispatched to a fire at the
gas pumps at the Fina Station, 1960 Dodd Road. Upon arrival we
found that a vehicle had driven over one of the pumps causing a
fire to ignite in the gas pumps. All of the safety features
built into�the pumping sys`tems functioned properly. Damage was
kept to the gasoline pumps, estimated at $2,500.
September 28, 1990 - The fire department responded to a routine
fire alarm activation at 23 Salem Church Road in Sunfish Lake.
The house was checked and we attempted to reset the fire alarm
however it would not reset. Upon a much deeper investigation it
was found there was an actual fire in the heating unit in the
pool area that is attached but in a separate area of the house.
The fire was confined to this heating unit and the estimated
damage was $700.
November 28, 1990 - Upon arrival the fire department found a
garage full of smoke and a fire in a trash can at 1709 Lansford
Lane. Quick thinking from the homeowner who used a fire
extinguisher kept the fire under control. Investigation
determined that the cause of the fire was ashes that were dumped
from the fire place into the trash can in the garage. There was
no damage due to fire. The fire department did ventilate smoke
out of the house with minor smoke damage. Estimated damage is
$600.
December 3, 1990 - The department was dispatched to a possible
Christmas tree fire outside the residence of 716 Stanwich Lane.
Upon fire department arrival there was a fire that extended to
the garage area of the residence. Quick action by the neighbor
who called in the fire and the fire department making a quick
knock down prevented the fire from spreading to anything more
than the garage door. The cause of the fire was determined to be
ashes from a fireplace that had been cleaned out four hours
earlier and placed in a trash can.
SECTION 2
LOORING FORWARD TO 1991
1991 promises to be a very exciting and challenging year.
Eight firefighters are scheduled to become certified in First
Responder and the entire department is scheduled for refresher
late in 1991. Also during 1991, in order to help assure that our
department is able to handle, on a basic response level,
hazardous materials incidents half of the department will become
trained to Level I Hazardous Materials Responders. This level
does not mean we can do any large scale hazardous materials
incident handling. What it does mean is that we will get the
much needed recognizing. identification and first steps to
proceed in handling a hazardous materials incident.
We also look forward to the delivery of our Equipment
Command Vehicle. All indications are that it will be a trend
setter as other pieces of equipment have been.
Hopefully next year in this report we will be able to report
even lower fire loss ratings for our protection districts and
that no fire deaths or serious injuries occurred.
SECTION 3
1990 CALLS BY TYPE AND JURISDICTION
1990 1989 1988
ACTUAL FIRES
Structure - Commercial 4 2 0
Structure - Residential 13 14 12
Outside of structure 2
Vehicle 1 5 21 22
Grass/Brush 1 3 5 44
No Value 1 1 6
48 19.43% 43 19.46% 84 29.58%
MEDICAL
Assist 60 47 57
Extrication 7 8 4
6 7 27.13% 5 5 24.89% 61 21.48%
HAZARDOUS SITUATION
Explosion - no fire 0 1 0
Spills/Leaks 3 6 9
Arcing/Shorting 0 2 3
Chemical 0 0 1
Power Llne Down 4 1 7
Assist Police 1 0 2
8 3.24% 1 0 4.52% 2 2 7.75%
FALSE ALARM
Residential Malfunction 33 36 37
Commercial Malfunction 22 27 20
Unintentional - Commercial 1 9 � 10 1 0
Unintentional - Residential 17 � l^ 12 9
Criminal 3 1 1
94 38.06% 86 38.91% 77 27.11%
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare 1 1 12 - 1 6
Steam Mistaken for Smoke 0 3 4
Other 14 10 13
25 10.12% 25 11.319'0 33 11.62%
MUTUAL AID 5 2.02% 2 0.90% 7 2.469'0
TOTAL CALLS 247 221 284
JURISDICTION
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MENDOTA
SUNFISH LAKE
LILYDALE
TOTALS
1990 1989 1988 3 YEAR AVERAGE
RUNS % RUNS °k RUNS % RUNS %
189 76.52 179 81.00 224 78.87 197.33 78.80
16 6.48 7 3.17 21 7.39 14.67 5.68
15 6.07 12 5.43 9 3.17 12.00 4.89
27 10.93 23 10.41 30 , 10.56 26.67 10.63
247 100.00 221 100.00 284 100.00 251 100.00
: � 1•�
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MENDOTA
SUNFISH LAKE
LILYDALE
SECTION 4
1990 FIRE LOSS VALUES
: : •.r�.r ,� _._.
$14,400 $6,800
$0 $0
$0 $0
$1,000 $50
$15,400 $6,850
$42,550
$0
$2,000
' $200
$44,750
REAL ESTATE/CONTENT LOSSES PER CAPITA
LILYDALE $1.63
MENDOTA $0.00
MENDOTA HEIGHTS $2.30
SUNFISH LAKE $0.00
TOTAL $2.11
��
$63,750
$0
$2,000
$1,250
$67,000
CLASSIFICATION
FIRE CALLS
MEEIINGS
DRILLS
WEEKLY CLEAN-UP
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
FIRE PREVENTION
FIRE MARSHAL
ADMINISTRATION
TOTALS
SECTION 5
1990 WORK PERFORMED
HOURS, 1990
4589
760
884.5
1073
605
456
842
1474
10684
HOURS, 1989
3533.5
661
728
629
751.5
358
800.5
1181
8284.5
SECTION 6
1990 BUDGET VS ACTUAL
1990 BUDGETED $187,230.00
1990 ACTUAL EXPENDITURES $193,444.00
SOURCE
LILYDALE CONTRACT
MENDOTA CANTRACT
SUNFISH LAKE CONTRACT
RAILROAD BILL FOR SERVICE
MN/DOT
FALSE ALARM CHARGES
GRANTS/OTHER
TOTAL
INCOME RECIEVED
$21,001.00
$9,883.00
$10,377.00
$4,223.00
$0.00
$0.00
$980.00
$46,464.00
HOURS, 1988
5498.5
691
884
711
907.5
456
830.75
1500
11022.75
% OF 1990
ACTUAL
EXPENDITURES
10.86
5.11
5.36
2.18
0.00
0.00
0.51
24.02
ACTUAL FIRES
Structure - Commercial
Structure - Residential
Outside of Structure
Vehicle
Grass/Brush
No Value
MEDICAL
Assist
Extrication
HAZARDOUS SITUATION
Explosion - no fire
Spills/Leaks
Arcing/Shorting
Chemical
Power Llne Down
Assist Police
FALSE ALARM
Residential Malfunction
Commercial Malfunction
Unintentional - Commercial
Unintentional - Residential
Malicious/Mischievious
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare
Steam Mistaken for Smoke
Other
MUTUAL AID
TOTAL CALLS �
SECTION 7
1990 SITUATIONS FOUND
MENDOTA HGTS MENDOTA SUNFISH LK. LILYDALE TOTAL PERCENTAGE
2 0 0 2 4 1.62
1 2 0 1 0 1 3 5.26
2 0 0 0 2 0.81
1 1 2 1 1 1 5 6.07
6 3 4 0 1 3 5.26
1 0 0 0 1 0.40
, 48 19.43
47 3 2 •- 8 60 24.29
6 1 0 0 7 2.83
67 27.13
0 0 0 0 0 0.00
3 0 0 0 3 1.21
0 0 0 0 0 0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0.00
3 0 1 0 4 1.62
1 0 0 0 1 0.40
8 3.24
21 0 3 9 33 13.36
19 3 0 0 22 8.91
17 2 0 0 1 9 7.69
1 0 , 1 2 4 1 7 6.88
3 0 0 � 0 3 1.21
94 38.06
9 0 0 2 1 1 4.45
0 0 0 0 0 0.00
1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5.67
25 10.12
5� 0 0 0 5 2.02
189 16 15 27 247 100.00
sEcnoN s
1990 RUN BREAKDOWN
RUNS MENDOTA HGTS MENDOTA SUNFISH LK. LILYDALE TOTAL PERCENTAGE
Week Day 75 4 5 6 9 0 36.44
Week Night 51 3 6 7 6 7 27.13
WeekEnds 63 9 4 14 90 36.44
TOTALS 189 16 15 27 247 100.00
� SECTION 9 •
1990 AVERAGE MANPOWER RESPONSE
T1ME PERIOD
Week day
Week Night
Week Ends
............ ... .....
12.26 17.40 13.80 10.83
18.86 19.00 18.67 21.14
18.19 16.62 16.00 15.79
SECTION 10
METHOD OF ALARM
METHOD '
Telephone to FD 7 � '
Private Alarm 70 6 6 11
Radio 1 1 1 1
Verbal Report to FD 4 1
911 Telephone 97 9 9 14
Unknown
TOTALS 1 89 1 6 1 5 2 7
SECTION 11
RESPONSE TIMES
ALL AREAS
TOTAL CALLS
EMERGBVCY
RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES)
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
TOTAL CALLS
EMERGB�ICY
RESPONSE TIME (MINUTES)
1990
247
183
6.33
184
137
5.95
1989
221
152
6.7
176
126
6.55
AVERAGE
12.48
19.09
17.56
TOTAL PERCENTAGE
7 2.83
9 3 37.65
1 3 5.26
5 2.02
1 29 52.23
0 0.00
247 100.00
1988 1987 1986
284 225
205 192
7.21 N/A 6.58
215 170
155 146
7.03 N /A 6.48
1985
230
217
5.93
202
190
5.72
SECTION 12
FIRE CAUSE
MENDOTA HGHTS MENDOTA SUNFISH LK
DETERMINED
Abandoned/Discarded Material 2
Backfire 6
Chiidren Playing With 1
Combustible to close to heat
High winds
Lightning 1
Improper Container _
Lack of Maintenance 2
Mechanical Failure 3 1
Misuse of Heat of Ignition 3
Part failure or leak
Short Circuit 1 1
Other Electrical Failure 4
Spontaneous Heating
Thawing
Rekind►e from previous fire
Other 6 2
TOTAL DETERMINED 2 9 2 2
UNDETERMINED
Not Reported
Undetermined 1
TOTAL UNDETERMINED 0 0 1
� INCINDIARY 1 1
SUSPICIOUS
NO FIRE
MUTUAL AID RESPONSE
ACTION TAKEN
EXTINGUISH
RESCUE/ASSIST
INVESTIGATE ONLY
REMOVE HAZARD
STAND BY
SALVAGE
MUTUAL AID
CANCEII.ED
TOTAL
1 1
153 13 11
5
189 16 15
LILYDALE TOTAL PERCENTAGE
2 0.81 %
6 2.43%
1 0.40%
0 0.00%
0 0.00%
1 0.40%
0 0.00%
1 3 1.21%
� 4 1.62%
, 3 1.21%
1 1 0.40%
2 0.81 %
4 1.62%
0 0.00%
0 0.00%
0 0.00°/a
8 3.24%
2 3 5 14.17%
0 "' 0.00%
1 0.40%
0 1 0.40%
2 0.81 %
2 0.81 %
25 202 81.78%
5 2.02%
2 7 247 100.00%
SECTION 13
ACTION TAKEN
MENDOTA HGHTS MENDOTA SUNRSH LK LILYDALE TOTAL PERCENTAGE
19 3 3 2 27 10.93%
4 9 4 2 6 61 24.70%
8 2 5 7 1 6 1 10 44.53%
12 1 13 5.26%
2 1 3 1.21 %
0 0.00%
5 . � 5 2.02%
20 3 '• 2 3 28 11.34%
189 16 15 27 247 100.00%
�. �
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
April 1, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Thomas C. Knuth
Senior Engineering Technician
SUBJECT: Highway 13 and Pilot Knob Road Utilities
Feasibility Study
Job No. 8420-A, Improvement No. 84-2A
INTRODUCTION•
In January 1990 the City Council received from staff an
updated feasibility report for serving the Garron site with
utilities, and a feasibility hearing was held on April 3, 1990.
Since then, the City has received a petition from the Church of
St. Peter for sanitary sewer and water service to be constructed
in 1992 in conjunction with Mn/DOT's construction of Phase I of
the Mendota Interchange. In subsequent discussions with Mr.
Steve Gage of Edge Commercial Real Estate (formerly Garron), he
has indicated that he does not contemplate development of his
site in the near future and therefore has requested that the
minimum amount of utility construction be done adjacent to his
site.
The discussion in this
the Church of St. Peter and
that must be done as part o
Mendota Interchange.
DISCUSSION•
report will deal mainly with serving
updating the utility construction
f the staged construction of the
Since the feasibility of serving the church with utilities
hinges on placing the sewer and watermain beneath the proposed
relocated Highway 13 so as to eliminate any street restoration
costs, it is imperative that construction occur in 1992 when
Mn/DOT will be doing their Stage I construction. It is proposed
that Mn/DOT do the actual construction of the utilities under a
Co-operative Agreement. We have received assurances that Stage I
contracts will be let in the spring of 1992 and that construction
will be completed that fall.
It has been determined that the most feasible route to serve
the church is a gravity line to the existing sanitary system in
the City of Mendota, thus eliminating the previously proposed
lift station. Preliminary discussions with Mendota are promis-
ing and a Co-operative Agreement with Mendota will also have to
be negotiated. Water however, will have to be brought to the
church from an,existing main in Pilot Knob Road and extended into
the City of Mendota at their request. The watermain construction
on Pilot Knob Road will likely require a separate City contract.
��
�
Other utilities which will have to be installed along with
Mn/DOT Stage I construction include the extension of the 12"
trunk watermain in the south frontage road for Highway 110 from
the Yorkton development to the proposed watermain in the Furlong
Addition, soon to be constructed under a separate City contract.
This trunk watermain is also proposed to be installed by
Mn/DOT under the Co-operative Agreement. The estimated total
costs for serving the Church of St. Peter, the City of Mendota,
and contiguous properties on Pilot Knob and the South Highway 110
Frontage Road are shown.
Sanitary Sewer $105 000
,
Watermain $240,000
(Highway 13 & Pilot Knob Road)
Watermain
(South Highway 110 Frontage)
Storm Sewer by Mn/DOT
$150,000
To be determined by
Cooperative Agreement
Utilities which will need to be installed during Stage II of
the Mn/DOT construction include completion of the 12" trunk
watermain on Acacia Boulevard, extending watermain south from the
Furlong Area to' Mendota Heights Road under the east Highway 55
Frontage Road, and possible sanitary sewer extensions on Pilot
Knob Road and Acacia Boulevard, depending on whether or not these
streets will be upgraded to MSA standards at that time, or if a
developer would petition for utilities on Pilot Knob Road.
Estimated costs for Stage II construction (water only) are shown.
Watermains -
(East Highway 55 Frontage)
Watermains
(Acacia Boulevard)
FUNDING
$96,000
$58,000
Project costs are proposed to be split between assessment by
front footage and trunk area. The trunk assessments are due to
the fact that there are some large parcels not developed at this
time but will benefit from this project. Extraordinary costs
such as rock excavation, jacked railroad and highway crossings
and some restoration costs, were considered to be chargeable as
area trunk assessments. These were calculated at 3.3 cents per
square foot for sanitary and 1.5 cents per square foot for water.
Front foot assessments are estimated to be $43.00 per front foot
for sanitary and $28.00 per front foot for water, plus services.
Because of the extraordinary frontage abutting cemetery land, it
is proposed that the Tax Increment Financing (T.I.F.) funding
pick up the cemetery frontages and watermain oversizing. At a
future date when any cemetery land is sold and developed, it
would pay a hookup charge for utilities financed by T.I.F. A
possible assessment scheme is shown:
STAGE I CONSTRIICTION:
Property Assessable
Sanitarv
Church of $61,000
of St. Peter
St. Peter 0
Cemetery (Sanitary)
St. Peter 0
Cemetery (Water)
Garron $12,000
Property
City of 0
Mendota
Acacia Cemetery 0
(Platted)
Acacia Cemetery 0
(Unplatted)
Franson 0
Hartz 0
Northland 0
Resurrection 0
Oversize Water 0
Assessable
Water
$37,000
0
0
$21,000
0
$ 4,000
$ 8,000
T.I.F. Total
0
$31,000
$26,000 -
, 0
$28,000
$47,000
$37,000
$98,000
$57,000
$33,000
$28,000
$51,000
$45,000
$ 6,000 0 $ 6,000
$ 6,000 0 $ 6,000
$13,000 0 $13,000
0 $150,000 $150,000
0 $ 8,000 $ 8,000
TOTAL $73,000 $95,000 $327,000 $495,000
Since most of the area Mn/DOT plans to charge the City for high-
way storm sewer costs is cemetery, it is proposed that T.I.F. pick up
those costs also.
City Treasurer Larry Shaughnessy has reviewed the proposed
funding scheme and believes it is appropriate. The proposed uses
of T.I.F. are consistant with the City's T.I.F. Plan adopted in
1981. Furthermore, the proposed utility extensions are important
components of the overall infrastructure necessary for continued
growth of our industrial/business tax base.
Items to Resolve Before Orderina Feasibilitv Hearina
1. Negotiate Cooperative Agreement with City of Mendota for
sewer and water connections.
2. Negotiate Cooperative Agreement with Mn/DOT for installing
sanitary sewer and watermain by Mn/DOT in Highway right-of-
way and arrive at storm sewer cost sharing.
3. Obtain easement from owner of Garron property.
: �
4. Determine whether upgrading Lexington/Highway 110 intersec-
tion is Stage I construction - if so, begin work on Coopera-
tive Agreement with Dakota County.
RECOMMENDATION•
We recommend that:
1. Council approve the use of T.I.F. funding for this
project as proposed.
2. Council approve connection of the sanitary sewer to the
Mendota system as proposed and authorize staff to work
with the City of Mendota on a Cooperative Agreement
allowing the connection.
And subject to Council approval of these��two recommenda-
tions, we find that this project is technically and financially
feasible. We recommend that Council order a feasibility hearing
for the May 21, 1991 City Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they
should pass a motion approving the T.I.F. funding, authorizing
staff to work with the City of Mendota on arriving at a Coopera-
tive Agreement and adopting Resolution No. 91- , ACCEPTING
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER, WATER, STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE ST. PETER'S
CHURCH AND ADJACENT AREAS (Improvement No. 84, Project No. 2-A).
TCK:dfw
/ ;
City of Mendota Heights
Dakota County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION NO. 91-
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT
AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED SANITARY
SEWER, WATER, AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
TO SERVE THE ST. PETER'S CHURCH AND ADJACENT AREAS
(IMPROVEMENT N0.84, PROJECT NO. 2)
WHEREAS, the City Engineer has submitted his report to the City Coun-
cil with respect to the proposed construction of the following im-
provements to serve St. Peter's Church and adjacent areas, to-wit:
The construction of an extension to the City's sanitary sewer
system, including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the
acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary
of streets and easements in the areas hereinafter more particu-
larly described.
The construction of a storm sewer system including appurtenances
and incidentals thereto and the acquisition of easements, in and
for the area hereinafter more particularly described.
The construction of an extension to the City's water distribution
system including appurtenances and incidentals thereto, and the
acquisition of easements, and the reconstruction where necessary
of streets and easements in the area hereinafter more particular-
ly described. ,
WHEREAS, the area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is
situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minneso-
ta, and is more particular�y described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 2, Perron Place, and Lot 16,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 34, Section 27; Lots 2, 26 and 27,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 29, Huber Subdivision, St. George
Subdivision, Section 28; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Gardenville
Re-Arrangement, Section 33; Block 1 of South Lanes Subdivision,
Section 34, Dakota County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, in said report said City Enqineer reported that the proposed
improvements and construction thereof were feasible and desirable and
further reported on the proposed costs of said improvements.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Mendota Heights, Minnesota as follows:
1. That the report of said City Engineer be and is hereby re-
ceived.
2. That a public hearing on said improvements be held on Tues-
day, May 21, 1991 at 8:00 P.M. at the Mendota Heights City
Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve in the City of Mendota Heights.
E •
3. That the City Clerk, with the aid and assistance of the City
Attorney, be and is hereby authorized and directed to pre-
pare a notice of said hearing and to cause said notice to be
published and mailed to the owners of the property situated
within said area, all in accordance with applicable Minneso-
ta Statutes.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 7th
day of May, 1991.
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
�
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By ,
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
� a �ry
�iEhIDOTA P LAfV1V I i'�!G r�IEET I hiG i� T I�IUTES
APRIL �1, 1991
ATTEtdDfi,IVCE� Ci�;Y� Clerk: Larry J�i�U, Counciipers�n �oan 02in,
Committee members Stephen Golias and Jin �ee.
The meetir�g �sias �pened at 7:1�� Pt1 at i:1�E VFI�
]:TEh1 1. The Direci-or of Public l�JorE:s; James E. Danielsan, from
h'lendota Heiyhts brouyht before the commission the inten� of
Mendota Heiyhi;s to supply i•�ater and sei=�er tttilities to the Church
af S�int Peters. They �=�ill be brinying i=�ater from Acacia Cemetery
area but i•�ould lik:e to tie into the hlendota set=�er system to
eiiminate the need for a seii�aUe p�tmpiny station. The I�WCC
engi�eers have determined that our se�•�er system is larye enouqh
for this addition. The se�l�er connection a�o��ld be made near the old
auctinn house. This �=�or�� ta�ould be done as part o# the road
reconstruction durinq the t'lendota interchanye project. In exchange
for usiny our settaer system, hIH �j�ould supply a 8 incl� i=�ater main
and a fire hydrant to the same appro;;imate location as the seil�er
conn�ci:ion. Mr. Danielson's phone and address are as follo�=�s .
James E. Danielson, Professional Engin�er
Directnr ofi Public WorE�s
75�s 5outh Pla�a Drive
Mendota Heiyhts, t�it� 551?C�
61 �-452-1 C�86
ITEhi ?. The planniny commission recommends extending the 8"
a�ater main to the intersec�ion of HWy 1� and. "D" street at the
time of road reconstruction. The purpose beiny to save the
additional costs of teari�y up the road at a later date. The
appro;;imate costs would be about ��G.U�� per #oot and about
�iG�a{�.C�C� fior an additional hydrant.
ITEM �. Discussion of t1�e request of Harmo�y International,
better F�na�l�n as the 5�•iee-t Adelines, to hold charita6le yambliny in
the Emporium oi Ja�z which is oa�ned by Ron Jacobs. bingo wo��ld be
played ti=�o times on Sundays, and if that yoes weli, two additional
yames duriny the a�eek �l�ould be added. Pull tabs �=�ould also be sold
in the same room during the binyo sessions. The St•�eet Adelines is
a rep��table, non-profit organi�ation and they have s��pplied us
�•iith there i�istory a�d tax exempt status.
Concerns of the planniny commission are as fiollows:
i. t�le are concerned about ��'�U extra people usiny a building tF►at
has ne�er paid any sei=�age fees foi�r times a i=�eeE:.
2. This same buildi�y is not payiny any ta::es at this time.
�. We need to checEi into the problems o�f embe��lemen� at he Arden
Hills Bingo Hall, and learn how to prevent ti��se problems.
4. We need ta adopt yambling ordi�a�ces to reg�.�late these types of
events.
,<
ITEM 4. The Mendata Planning Commission recoinmends adoption of
the attached ordinances related to yamblinr� iisted as ordinance
no . �C�7
ITEM 5. There is debri� in the parFi, The ParEis and Recrea�cion
Commi,i-tee needs to post some no dumping siyr►s.
I7EM 6 Larry Jung is to post a sign up sh�et in the Post Ofifice
for �eople interested in serving on ti�e Park:s and i�ecreati�n
Commi.ttee.
ITEM 7. Jim Lee is looE�ing for the sign �•�e already have f�r park:
hours and reyulatzons. Sharon Perron may have tf�is or k:noti� af its
�•�hereabauts. . ,
ITEM 8. We recommend a deadline of no later�than August �ist4
1991 for mandatory compliance �=�ith the Mendota se�•�er ordinance no.
3U�. We also recommend that the council approve a le�:ter to be
sent out to that effect that the city c1erEL has drawn up.
ITEh1 9. Larry Juny is ta yive information on the Arbor Day
activities to Sim Lee for action.
Tt�is meetiny tlaas adjo�trned a�: 9:G7 Ph'!.
�
0
Paqe - �
0