1991-02-05CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 5, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption,
4. Approval of the January 15th Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the January Building Report.
b. Acknowledgment of the December Fire Department Report.
c. Acknowledgment of the November 27, 1990 Planning
Commission Minutes.
d. Acknowledgment of the January 3rd Planning Commission
Minutes.
e. Adoption of Resolution Opposing Further Cuts in State Aid
to Cities - RESOLUTION NO. 91-04.
f. Approval of the List of Contractors.
g. Approval of the List of Claims.
* h. Approve Sale of Surplus Property to Outpost Hunting and
Sporting.
* i. Adoption of Goodwill RESOLUTION NO. 91-05 to Pereslavl,
Soviet Union..
End of Consent Calendar
6. Presentation
a. Presentation of Proposed Air Corridor Modifications.
7. Hearings
a. CASE NO. 90-44: Strub - Subdivision -
* 8:00 *
(Recommend Continuing to 8:00 P.M. on March 5, 1991).
b. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties (Solvay Phase II) -
* 8:00 * Amendment to CUP for PUD
RESOLUTION NO. 91-06
**
c. CASE NO. 91-01: St. Paul Turner's Gym. Society -
* 8:30 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezoning
(Recommend Continuing to 8:15 P.M. on March 5, 1991)
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 5, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption,
4. Approval of the January 15th Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the January Building Report.
b. Acknowledgment of the December Fire Department Report.
c. Acknowledgment of the November 27, 1990 Planning
Commission Minutes.
d. Acknowledgment of the January 3rd Planning Commission
Minutes.
e. Adoption of Resolution Opposing Further Cuts in State Aid
to Cities - RESOLUTION NO. 91-04.
f. Approval of the List of Contractors.
g. Approval of the List of Claims.
* h. Approve Sale of Surplus Property to Outpost Hunting and
Sporting.
* i. Adoption of Goodwill RESOLUTION NO. 91-05 to Pereslavl,
Soviet Union..
End of Consent Calendar
6. Presentation
a. Presentation of Proposed Air Corridor Modifications.
7. Hearings
a. CASE NO. 90-44: Strub - Subdivision -
* 8:00 *
(Recommend Continuing to 8:00 P.M. on March 5, 1991).
b. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties (Solvay Phase II) -
* 8:00 * Amendment to CUP for PUD
RESOLUTION NO. 91-06
**
c. CASE NO. 91-01: St. Paul Turner's Gym. Society -
* 8:30 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezoning
(Recommend Continuing to 8:15 P.M. on March 5, 1991)
d. CASE NO. 90-39: R.A. Putnam and Associates -
* 8:45 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(Applicant has Requested the Hearing to be Continued
to 8:00 P.M. on February 19, 1991)
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. CASE NO. 91-03: Mossman (T. Belvidere's) - Variance.
b. CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Variance.
**
c. Discuss Enforcement Policy Regarding Zoning Ordinance No.
1001: The Weed Ordinance.
d. Report on Requests for and Exemptions Granted from the
Weed Ordinance.
e. Discuss Property Purchase Offer within Tax Increment
District.
f. Consider City Hall Payment Application.
*** g. Approval of Mendakota Park Plans and Authorize Receipt
of Bids and Consider Modification of Architectural
Agreement with Station 19 Architects.
**
*
h. Consider Commission Appointments and Reappointments.
i. Discuss Team Building and Goal Setting Session Dates.
Consider Property Purchase offer - 2370 Highway 55.
9. Council Comments
10. Adjourn to Commission Interviews on February 19, 1991 (Time to
be Chosen by City Council).
d. CASE NO. 90-39: R.A. Putnam and Associates -
* 8:45 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(Applicant has Requested the Hearing to be Continued
to 8:00 P.M. on February 19, 1991)
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. CASE NO. 91-03: Mossman (T. Belvidere's) - Variance.
b. CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Variance.
**
c. Discuss Enforcement Policy Regarding Zoning Ordinance No.
1001: The Weed Ordinance.
d. Report on Requests for and Exemptions Granted from the
Weed Ordinance.
e. Discuss Property Purchase Offer within Tax Increment
District.
f. Consider City Hall Payment Application.
*** g. Approval of Mendakota Park Plans and Authorize Receipt
of Bids and Consider Modification of Architectural
Agreement with Station 19 Architects.
**
*
h. Consider Commission Appointments and Reappointments.
i. Discuss Team Building and Goal Setting Session Dates.
Consider Property Purchase offer - 2370 Highway 55.
9. Council Comments
10. Adjourn to Commission Interviews on February 19, 1991 (Time to
be Chosen by City Council).
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 5, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for February 5th Council Meeting
Three items (5h., 5i., 8j) have been added to the agenda (*).
Extra information have been submitted for items 7b., 8b., and 8i
(**). Item 8g., memo regarding Station 19 Architects, was
submitted in the original Council packet on Friday - it is now
formally listed on tonight's agenda (***).
3. Agenda Adoption
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda
printed on pink paper.
5h. Approve Sale of Surplus Property to Outpost Hunting and
Sporting.
See attached memo.
5i. Adoption of Goodwill Resolution No. 91-05 to Pereslavl, Soviet
Union.
See attached Resolution.
7b. United Properties - Solvay Phase II Storm Water Retention
Pond.
See attached memo.
8b. Pentel Variance - Petition Opposing Request.
See attached petition and map.
8h. Planning Commission Appointment Process - Receive Additional
Application.
See attached application.
8j. Consider Property Purchase Offer - 2370 Highway 55.
See attached memo.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 5, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for February 5th Council Meeting
Three items (5h., 5i., 8j) have been added to the agenda (*).
Extra information have been submitted for items 7b., 8b., and 8i
(**). Item 8g., memo regarding Station 19 Architects, was
submitted in the original Council packet on Friday - it is now
formally listed on tonight's agenda (***).
3. Agenda Adoption
It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda
printed on pink paper.
5h. Approve Sale of Surplus Property to Outpost Hunting and
Sporting.
See attached memo.
5i. Adoption of Goodwill Resolution No. 91-05 to Pereslavl, Soviet
Union.
See attached Resolution.
7b. United Properties - Solvay Phase II Storm Water Retention
Pond.
See attached memo.
8b. Pentel Variance - Petition Opposing Request.
See attached petition and map.
8h. Planning Commission Appointment Process - Receive Additional
Application.
See attached application.
8j. Consider Property Purchase Offer - 2370 Highway 55.
See attached memo.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 5, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
g1' Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of the January 15th Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the January Building Report.
b. Acknowledgment of the December Fire Department Report.
c. Acknowledgment of the November 27, 1990 Planning
Commission Minutes.
d. Acknowledgment of the January 3rd Planning Commission
Minutes.
e. Adoption of Resolution Opposing Further Cuts in State Aid
to Cities - RESOLUTION NO. 91-04.
f. Approval of the List of Contractors.
g. Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Presentation
a. Presentation of Proposed Air Corridor Modifications.
7. Hearings
a. CASE NO. 90-44: Strub - Subdivision -
* 8:00 *
(Recommend Continuing to 8:00 P.M. on March 5, 1991).
b. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties (Solvay Phase II) -
* 8:00 * Amendment to CUP for PUD
RESOLUTION NO. 91-05
c. CASE NO. 91-01: St. Paul Turner's Gym. Society -
* 8:30 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezoning
(Recommend Continuing to 8:15 P.M. on March 5, 1991)
d. CASE NO. 90-39: R.A. Putnam and Associates -
* 8:45 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(Applicant has Requested the Hearing to be Continued
to 8:00 P.M. on February 19, 1991)
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 5, 1991 - 7:30 P.M.
g1' Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Agenda Adoption
4. Approval of the January 15th Minutes
5. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the January Building Report.
b. Acknowledgment of the December Fire Department Report.
c. Acknowledgment of the November 27, 1990 Planning
Commission Minutes.
d. Acknowledgment of the January 3rd Planning Commission
Minutes.
e. Adoption of Resolution Opposing Further Cuts in State Aid
to Cities - RESOLUTION NO. 91-04.
f. Approval of the List of Contractors.
g. Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
6. Presentation
a. Presentation of Proposed Air Corridor Modifications.
7. Hearings
a. CASE NO. 90-44: Strub - Subdivision -
* 8:00 *
(Recommend Continuing to 8:00 P.M. on March 5, 1991).
b. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties (Solvay Phase II) -
* 8:00 * Amendment to CUP for PUD
RESOLUTION NO. 91-05
c. CASE NO. 91-01: St. Paul Turner's Gym. Society -
* 8:30 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezoning
(Recommend Continuing to 8:15 P.M. on March 5, 1991)
d. CASE NO. 90-39: R.A. Putnam and Associates -
* 8:45 * Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(Applicant has Requested the Hearing to be Continued
to 8:00 P.M. on February 19, 1991)
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. CASE NO. 91-03: Mossman (T. Belvidere's) - Variance.
b. CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Variance.
c. Discuss Enforcement Policy Regarding Zoning Ordinance No.
1001: The Weed Ordinance.
d. Report on Requests for and Exemptions Granted from the
Weed Ordinance.
e. Discuss Property Purchase Offer within Tax Increment
District.
f. Consider City Hall Payment Application.
g -
Approval of Mendakota Park Plans and Authorize Receipt
of Bids.
h. Consider Commission Appointments and Reappointments.
i. Discuss Team Building and Goal Setting Session Dates.
9. Council Comments
10. Adjourn to Commission Interviews on February 19, 1991 (Time to
be Chosen by City Council).
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. CASE NO. 91-03: Mossman (T. Belvidere's) - Variance.
b. CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Variance.
c. Discuss Enforcement Policy Regarding Zoning Ordinance No.
1001: The Weed Ordinance.
d. Report on Requests for and Exemptions Granted from the
Weed Ordinance.
e. Discuss Property Purchase Offer within Tax Increment
District.
f. Consider City Hall Payment Application.
g -
Approval of Mendakota Park Plans and Authorize Receipt
of Bids.
h. Consider Commission Appointments and Reappointments.
i. Discuss Team Building and Goal Setting Session Dates.
9. Council Comments
10. Adjourn to Commission Interviews on February 19, 1991 (Time to
be Chosen by City Council).
Page No. 2999
January 16, 1991
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, January 15, 1991
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Blesener, Cummins, Koch and Smith.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting, further
revised to remove item 5b, Fire Department
monthly report, from the agenda and to move
item 5e, Barton-Aschman contract, to the
regular portion of the agenda.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the
minutes of the January 2nd regular meeting.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Councilmember Smith moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly
report for December.
b. Acknowledgment of a notice of water rate
increase from the St. Paul Water Utility.
c. Authorization to accept quotes and issue a
purchase order for a plain paper facsimile
machine for joint use by the
Administration/Engineering/Utility/Code
Enforcement Departments.
d. Adoption of a letter of appreciation for
Dr. Thaddeus Chao to be presented by
former Mayor Lockwood at a retirement
Page No. 2999
January 16, 1991
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, January 15, 1991
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Blesener, Cummins, Koch and Smith.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting, further
revised to remove item 5b, Fire Department
monthly report, from the agenda and to move
item 5e, Barton-Aschman contract, to the
regular portion of the agenda.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Councilmember Blesener moved approval of the
minutes of the January 2nd regular meeting.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Councilmember Smith moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly
report for December.
b. Acknowledgment of a notice of water rate
increase from the St. Paul Water Utility.
c. Authorization to accept quotes and issue a
purchase order for a plain paper facsimile
machine for joint use by the
Administration/Engineering/Utility/Code
Enforcement Departments.
d. Adoption of a letter of appreciation for
Dr. Thaddeus Chao to be presented by
former Mayor Lockwood at a retirement
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PARK CONTRACT
Page No. 3000
January 16, 1991
dinner in Dr. Chao's honor on February
2nd.
e. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated and attached hereto.
f. Approval of the list of claims dated and
totalling $1,025,028.37.
g. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the
January 8th Park and Recreation Commission
meeting.
h. Acceptance of a letter of resignation from
Carol Bakka from the position of Police
Secretary, effective April 1, 1991.
It was noted that the renewal of the
Centex Homes' General Contractor License,
which was included in the list of
contractor licenses, is approved with the
recognition that Council has concerns over
approval of the license given past
allegations of poor workmanship and
inadequate quality and that it may
undertake a future investigation of the
appropriateness of renewal of the Centex
license.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a letter from Barton
Aschman Associates requesting an increase in
its contract for park design, on the basis
that the original contract anticipated
$346,000 in construction for Mendakota Park
while the project has been expanded and is now
estimated to be $550,000. Council also
acknowledged a memo from staff regarding the
request and recommending that the contract be
amended to a "time and materials basis."
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would like a
$30,000 cap to be established in the contract.
Barton Aschman would then have to come back
for additional Council approval if the $30,000
is not sufficient to cover time and materials.
Councilmember Blesener moved that the contract
with Barton Aschman be amended to increase the
Mendakota Park design to a "not to exceed"
amount of $30,000, and further that staff be
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PARK CONTRACT
Page No. 3000
January 16, 1991
dinner in Dr. Chao's honor on February
2nd.
e. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated and attached hereto.
f. Approval of the list of claims dated and
totalling $1,025,028.37.
g. Acknowledgement of the minutes of the
January 8th Park and Recreation Commission
meeting.
h. Acceptance of a letter of resignation from
Carol Bakka from the position of Police
Secretary, effective April 1, 1991.
It was noted that the renewal of the
Centex Homes' General Contractor License,
which was included in the list of
contractor licenses, is approved with the
recognition that Council has concerns over
approval of the license given past
allegations of poor workmanship and
inadequate quality and that it may
undertake a future investigation of the
appropriateness of renewal of the Centex
license.
Councilmember Koch seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a letter from Barton
Aschman Associates requesting an increase in
its contract for park design, on the basis
that the original contract anticipated
$346,000 in construction for Mendakota Park
while the project has been expanded and is now
estimated to be $550,000. Council also
acknowledged a memo from staff regarding the
request and recommending that the contract be
amended to a "time and materials basis."
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he would like a
$30,000 cap to be established in the contract.
Barton Aschman would then have to come back
for additional Council approval if the $30,000
is not sufficient to cover time and materials.
Councilmember Blesener moved that the contract
with Barton Aschman be amended to increase the
Mendakota Park design to a "not to exceed"
amount of $30,000, and further that staff be
Page No. 3001
January 16, 1991
directed to work out a new letter of agreement
with Barton Aschman.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
SOLVAY BUILDING PERMIT Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works
Director Danielson regarding a request from
United Properties for approval of a building
foundation permit for phase 2 of the Solvay
Animal Health, Inc. facility (construction of
a 30,000 square foot free-standing
pharmaceutical laboratory).
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
STREET LIGHTS
Mayor Mertensotto stated that at the time
Solvay built phase one of its project, they
anticipated that they might need expansion for
additional use and set aside an adjacent
parcel of land for the proposed expansion. He
further stated that United Properties has
agreed to go the public hearing process for
amendment of the Solvay P.U.D and to process
requested variances for parking, sign and
building setbacks.
Councilmember Cummins moved to' grant a
foundation permit for construction of phase 2
of Solvay Animal Health, Inc.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Administrator Lawell informed Council that
United Properties understands that any
foundation permit will be at the sole risk of
United and also that Dale Glowa has
acknowledged that if the necessary variances
are denied he will have to make adjustments in
the building.
Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works
Director Danielson regarding requests for
street lights along Huber Drive and on Marie
Avenue at Eagle Ridge Drive.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council has been
considering a street light policy for some
time. He informed the audience that he and
former Councilmember Hartmann had been
appointed as a committee to be responsible for
recommending a residential street light
standard, but that they had not found a
standard that they particularly liked. He
further stated that he has no problem with the
requests but thinks Council should give
Page No. 3001
January 16, 1991
directed to work out a new letter of agreement
with Barton Aschman.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
SOLVAY BUILDING PERMIT Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works
Director Danielson regarding a request from
United Properties for approval of a building
foundation permit for phase 2 of the Solvay
Animal Health, Inc. facility (construction of
a 30,000 square foot free-standing
pharmaceutical laboratory).
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
STREET LIGHTS
Mayor Mertensotto stated that at the time
Solvay built phase one of its project, they
anticipated that they might need expansion for
additional use and set aside an adjacent
parcel of land for the proposed expansion. He
further stated that United Properties has
agreed to go the public hearing process for
amendment of the Solvay P.U.D and to process
requested variances for parking, sign and
building setbacks.
Councilmember Cummins moved to' grant a
foundation permit for construction of phase 2
of Solvay Animal Health, Inc.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Administrator Lawell informed Council that
United Properties understands that any
foundation permit will be at the sole risk of
United and also that Dale Glowa has
acknowledged that if the necessary variances
are denied he will have to make adjustments in
the building.
Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works
Director Danielson regarding requests for
street lights along Huber Drive and on Marie
Avenue at Eagle Ridge Drive.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that Council has been
considering a street light policy for some
time. He informed the audience that he and
former Councilmember Hartmann had been
appointed as a committee to be responsible for
recommending a residential street light
standard, but that they had not found a
standard that they particularly liked. He
further stated that he has no problem with the
requests but thinks Council should give
SOLVAY
HEARING - M.I.S.T.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 3002
January 16, 1991
consideration to adopting a policy and a
standard for major intersections such as those
requested. He felt that the lights used in
the United Properties business park are
appropriate.
Councilmember Cummins suggested tabling the
requests until the spring Council workshop, at
which time the new members can be given
background information.
Councilmember Smith stated that she would
appreciate the opportunity to learn more about
the issue, that she has no problem with the
lights but does have some questions.
It was Council consensus to lay the matter
over and to discuss a street light policy at
the Council goal setting workshop.
Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Properties,
presented and reviewed drawings and the site
plan for the Solvay phase 2 project. He
described the variances which will be
requested, and confirmed that United
Properties understands and accepts that there
might be risk involved in acquiring a
foundation permit before the minor PUD
amendment and variances are considered.
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
purpose of a continued public hearing on the
Con -Spec - M.I.S.T. request for conditional
use permit for an indoor soccer arena.
Council acknowledged a memo from
Administrative Assistant Batchelder indicating
that MIST has been unable to obtain financing
for the project and that it appears that they
will not pursue the project.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing
be closed.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to terminate the
Con-Spec/MIST application from further
SOLVAY
HEARING - M.I.S.T.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 3002
January 16, 1991
consideration to adopting a policy and a
standard for major intersections such as those
requested. He felt that the lights used in
the United Properties business park are
appropriate.
Councilmember Cummins suggested tabling the
requests until the spring Council workshop, at
which time the new members can be given
background information.
Councilmember Smith stated that she would
appreciate the opportunity to learn more about
the issue, that she has no problem with the
lights but does have some questions.
It was Council consensus to lay the matter
over and to discuss a street light policy at
the Council goal setting workshop.
Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Properties,
presented and reviewed drawings and the site
plan for the Solvay phase 2 project. He
described the variances which will be
requested, and confirmed that United
Properties understands and accepts that there
might be risk involved in acquiring a
foundation permit before the minor PUD
amendment and variances are considered.
Mayor Mertensotto opened the meeting for the
purpose of a continued public hearing on the
Con -Spec - M.I.S.T. request for conditional
use permit for an indoor soccer arena.
Council acknowledged a memo from
Administrative Assistant Batchelder indicating
that MIST has been unable to obtain financing
for the project and that it appears that they
will not pursue the project.
Mayor Mertensotto asked for questions and
comments from the audience.
There being no questions or comments,
Councilmember Cummins moved that the hearing
be closed.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to terminate the
Con-Spec/MIST application from further
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
FURLONG UPDATE
Page No. 3003
January 16, 1991
consideration.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged an update on Furlong Area
improvements. Engineer Klayton Eckles briefly
reviewed the memo, informing Council that HRA
funding is available to pay off assessments
for low income households and reduce
assessments to moderate income households. He
informed Council on the status of plans and
specifications and easement negotiations.
With respect to easement acquisition, Mayor
Mertensotto stated that it must be understood
that easements will not be purchased until it
is certain that the project will go through.
He felt that a letter of understanding on
easement acquisition should be conditioned
upon the City actually ordering the project.
He suggested that the property owners be
requested to sign the easement documents but
be given a letter of understanding that the
payments will not be made and the easements
will not be filed until the project is
ordered.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if there is a way to
assist residents with their hook-up charges,
including those costs within the assessment
program for those home owners who consent to
assessing hook-up costs.
Treasurer Shaughnessy responded that the
question has not been fully investigated but
that the City would have to take bids and
award a contract for bringing pipe from the
services to the houses. Mayor Mertensotto
asked that staff research the matter.
Mayor Mertensotto noted that Councilmembers
Blesener and Cummins have been opposed to the
project in the past and asked for their
comments.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she has
always been opposed in principle and still is,
but that she believes it would be a disservice
to the neighborhood to continue to oppose
plans that are underway.
Councilmember Cummins responded that his
objection has been premised on the fact that
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
FURLONG UPDATE
Page No. 3003
January 16, 1991
consideration.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged an update on Furlong Area
improvements. Engineer Klayton Eckles briefly
reviewed the memo, informing Council that HRA
funding is available to pay off assessments
for low income households and reduce
assessments to moderate income households. He
informed Council on the status of plans and
specifications and easement negotiations.
With respect to easement acquisition, Mayor
Mertensotto stated that it must be understood
that easements will not be purchased until it
is certain that the project will go through.
He felt that a letter of understanding on
easement acquisition should be conditioned
upon the City actually ordering the project.
He suggested that the property owners be
requested to sign the easement documents but
be given a letter of understanding that the
payments will not be made and the easements
will not be filed until the project is
ordered.
Mayor Mertensotto asked if there is a way to
assist residents with their hook-up charges,
including those costs within the assessment
program for those home owners who consent to
assessing hook-up costs.
Treasurer Shaughnessy responded that the
question has not been fully investigated but
that the City would have to take bids and
award a contract for bringing pipe from the
services to the houses. Mayor Mertensotto
asked that staff research the matter.
Mayor Mertensotto noted that Councilmembers
Blesener and Cummins have been opposed to the
project in the past and asked for their
comments.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she has
always been opposed in principle and still is,
but that she believes it would be a disservice
to the neighborhood to continue to oppose
plans that are underway.
Councilmember Cummins responded that his
objection has been premised on the fact that
EXCESS MN/DOT R.O.W.
Page No. 3004
January 16, 1991
perhaps the neighborhood should not be
sustained indefinitely. He stated that he
feels the project has proceeded far enough
that Council should stick with it.
Councilmembers Koch and Smith indicated that
they are in favor of proceeding with the
project.
Responding to questions from Councilmember
Blesener, Mr. Eckles stated that staff has not
attempted to negotiate trail easements and
that the greenhouse will be required to
connect to sanitary sewer but that there is
some question as to whether water will be
extended to the greenhouse area before the
Mendota Interchange project is constructed.
It was the Council consensus to approve the
easement amounts, on the basis of $0.30 per
square foot plus damages and to direct staff
to proceed with the vacation process for the
Schwartz and Tousignant parcels.
Council acknowledged receipt of a memo from
Public Works Director Danielson regarding a
letter from Mn/DOT informing the City of
impending reconveyance of T.H. 149 right-of-
way at the northeast quadrant of T.H. 110/149.
Mr. Danielson stated that Mn/DOT intends to
release T.H. 149 right-of-way east of the
shopping center and that the first piece
proposed to be released is the former Birch
property north of T.H. 110.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he understood
that the City has the first option on the
right-of-way and that if the City needs the
land it could purchase the right-of-way from
Mn/DOT at current market value. In the event
tha the City does not want the property, the
would have the option to repurchase it
a market value.
Councilmember Blesener felt that Council
should keep its options open in case it some
day decides to put a bridge over T.H. 110.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the potential
use of the property should be studied as part
of the Paster feasibility study.
It was noted that if study of City needs and
options for the property is included in the
Paster feasibility study, those cost for that
`,
EXCESS MN/DOT R.O.W.
Page No. 3004
January 16, 1991
perhaps the neighborhood should not be
sustained indefinitely. He stated that he
feels the project has proceeded far enough
that Council should stick with it.
Councilmembers Koch and Smith indicated that
they are in favor of proceeding with the
project.
Responding to questions from Councilmember
Blesener, Mr. Eckles stated that staff has not
attempted to negotiate trail easements and
that the greenhouse will be required to
connect to sanitary sewer but that there is
some question as to whether water will be
extended to the greenhouse area before the
Mendota Interchange project is constructed.
It was the Council consensus to approve the
easement amounts, on the basis of $0.30 per
square foot plus damages and to direct staff
to proceed with the vacation process for the
Schwartz and Tousignant parcels.
Council acknowledged receipt of a memo from
Public Works Director Danielson regarding a
letter from Mn/DOT informing the City of
impending reconveyance of T.H. 149 right-of-
way at the northeast quadrant of T.H. 110/149.
Mr. Danielson stated that Mn/DOT intends to
release T.H. 149 right-of-way east of the
shopping center and that the first piece
proposed to be released is the former Birch
property north of T.H. 110.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he understood
that the City has the first option on the
right-of-way and that if the City needs the
land it could purchase the right-of-way from
Mn/DOT at current market value. In the event
tha the City does not want the property, the
would have the option to repurchase it
a market value.
Councilmember Blesener felt that Council
should keep its options open in case it some
day decides to put a bridge over T.H. 110.
Mayor Mertensotto suggested that the potential
use of the property should be studied as part
of the Paster feasibility study.
It was noted that if study of City needs and
options for the property is included in the
Paster feasibility study, those cost for that
`,
BOARD OF REVIEW
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Page No. 3005
January 16, 1991
portion of the study must be borne by the
City.
Councilmember Cummins asked whether past
reports addressing the crossing of T.H. 110
could be updated. Councilmember Blesener
suggested that the Planning Consultant be
requested to consider the matter and suggest
the best course of action with respect to the
right-of-way.
It was the consensus that Mn/DOT be notified
that Council is not interested in releasing
the right-of-way at this time.
Councilmember Blesener moved that the annual
Board of Review meeting be conducted at 7:30
P.M. on Tuesday, April 9th.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Council about
contacts he has had with the City's insurance
carrier the LMCIT's obligations with respect
to coverage for the Centex litigation.
Mayor Mertensotto also informed Council of an
upcoming meeting of the Dakota County Citizens
Against Burning and an upcoming AMM
legislative reception and Board vacancy.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she would
appreciate periodic updates to Council from
NDC -4 representative Rogosheske. It was the
consensus that Mr. Rogosheske be requested to
appear at a February Council meeting.
Council discussed the Park and Recreation
Commission minutes, particularly with respect
to indefinitely delaying installation of play
equipment at the Sibley Park. Councilmember
Blesener stated that she feels strongly that
delaying installation is a bad decision and
pointed out that many residents fully expect
to see play structures at the site. She
pointed out that a commitment was made as part
of the referendum package and that the
commitment should be honored. Staff was
directed to place the matter on the next Park
Commission agenda.
BOARD OF REVIEW
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Page No. 3005
January 16, 1991
portion of the study must be borne by the
City.
Councilmember Cummins asked whether past
reports addressing the crossing of T.H. 110
could be updated. Councilmember Blesener
suggested that the Planning Consultant be
requested to consider the matter and suggest
the best course of action with respect to the
right-of-way.
It was the consensus that Mn/DOT be notified
that Council is not interested in releasing
the right-of-way at this time.
Councilmember Blesener moved that the annual
Board of Review meeting be conducted at 7:30
P.M. on Tuesday, April 9th.
Councilmember Smith seconded the motion.
Mayor Mertensotto informed Council about
contacts he has had with the City's insurance
carrier the LMCIT's obligations with respect
to coverage for the Centex litigation.
Mayor Mertensotto also informed Council of an
upcoming meeting of the Dakota County Citizens
Against Burning and an upcoming AMM
legislative reception and Board vacancy.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she would
appreciate periodic updates to Council from
NDC -4 representative Rogosheske. It was the
consensus that Mr. Rogosheske be requested to
appear at a February Council meeting.
Council discussed the Park and Recreation
Commission minutes, particularly with respect
to indefinitely delaying installation of play
equipment at the Sibley Park. Councilmember
Blesener stated that she feels strongly that
delaying installation is a bad decision and
pointed out that many residents fully expect
to see play structures at the site. She
pointed out that a commitment was made as part
of the referendum package and that the
commitment should be honored. Staff was
directed to place the matter on the next Park
Commission agenda.
ADJOURN
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 3006
January 16, 1991
There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Blesener moved that
the meeting be -adjourned.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:03 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ADJOURN
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 3006
January 16, 1991
There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Blesener moved that
the meeting be -adjourned.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 9:03 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMO
Date: 1-28-91
Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
Building Activity Report for January 1991
CURRENT MONTH
BUILDING
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected
SFD 3 487,904.00 4,257.01
APT 0 0 0
TOWNHOUSE 0 0 0
CONDO 0 0 0
MISC. 4 10,934.00 336.15
C/I 4 41,417.00 768.90
Sub Total 11 540,255.00 5,362.06
TRADE
PERMITS:
Plumbing 12 537.00
Water 8 40.00
Sewer 7 122.50
Heat, AC,
& Gas 15 2,180.00
Sub Total 42 2,879.50
Licensing:
Contractor's
Licenses 169
4,225.00
YEAR TO DATE 91 YEAR TO DATE 90
No. Valuation Fee Collected
No. Valuation Fee Collected
4 704,282.00 5,976.30
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
8 54,145.00 1,000.50
5 60,935.00 1,063.43
17 819,362.00 8,040.23
3
1
5
8
79.00
5.00
87.50
458.00
17 629.50
197 4,925.00
Total 222 540,255.00 12,466.56 I 231 819,362.00 13,594.73
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and
valuation amounts.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMO
Date: 1-28-91
Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
Building Activity Report for January 1991
CURRENT MONTH
BUILDING
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected
SFD 3 487,904.00 4,257.01
APT 0 0 0
TOWNHOUSE 0 0 0
CONDO 0 0 0
MISC. 4 10,934.00 336.15
C/I 4 41,417.00 768.90
Sub Total 11 540,255.00 5,362.06
TRADE
PERMITS:
Plumbing 12 537.00
Water 8 40.00
Sewer 7 122.50
Heat, AC,
& Gas 15 2,180.00
Sub Total 42 2,879.50
Licensing:
Contractor's
Licenses 169
4,225.00
YEAR TO DATE 91 YEAR TO DATE 90
No. Valuation Fee Collected
No. Valuation Fee Collected
4 704,282.00 5,976.30
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
8 54,145.00 1,000.50
5 60,935.00 1,063.43
17 819,362.00 8,040.23
3
1
5
8
79.00
5.00
87.50
458.00
17 629.50
197 4,925.00
Total 222 540,255.00 12,466.56 I 231 819,362.00 13,594.73
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and
valuation amounts.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT
DECEMBER 1990 MONTHLY REPORT
FIRE CALLS NO. 90222 - 90247
NUMBER OF CALLS: 2 6
ALARMS DISPATCHED:
ACTUAL FIRES
Structure - MH Commercial
Structure - MH Residential
Structure - Contract Areas
Vehicle - MH
Vehicle - Contract Areas
Grass/Brush/No Value MH
Grass/Brush/No Value Contract
MEDICAL
Assist
Extrication
HAZARDOUS SITUATION
Spills/Leaks
Arcing/Shorting
Chemical
Power Line Down
FALSE ALARM
Residential Malfunction
Commercial Malfunction
Unintentional - Commercial
Unintentional - Residential
Criminal
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare
Steam Mistaken for Smoke
Other
MUTUAL AID
TOTAL CALLS
NUMBER
1
3
3
8
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
26
STRUCTURE CONTENTS
MISC. TOTALS TO DATE
$25
$600
$17,300
TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES
$0
$0 $17,925
$25
$20,850
$2,900
$21,000
$12,000
FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) $17,925
MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS
MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS
MEND. HIS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE
$56,775
$15,000
$26,875
$41,875
BILLING FOR SERVICES
AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE
MN/DOT
MILW. RR
CNR RR
OTHERS:
LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2 4
MENDOTA 0
SUNFISH LAKE 0
LILYDALE 2
OTHER 0
TOTAL 2 6
187
15
15
25
5
247
LAST YEAR
TOTALS:
176
$0
$0
$0
$4,223
$0
$4,223
7
12
19
7
221
WORK PERFORMED HOURS
TO DATE LAST YEAR
FIRE CALLS 447 4589
MEETINGS 71 76 0
DRILLS 66 884.5
WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 8 4 1073
SPECIAL ACTIVITY 28.5 605
ADMINISTATIVE 54 1474
FIRE MARSHAL 6 0
3533.5
661
728
629
1109.5
1181
830.5 800.5
TOTALS 810.5 10216
8642.5
FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH
INSPECTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
RE -INSPECTION
MEETINGS
ADMINISTRATION
SPECIAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
14.5
13
24.5
60
REMARKS: SEE 011 -ER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT
DECEMBER 1990 MONTHLY REPORT
FIRE CALLS NO. 90222 - 90247
NUMBER OF CALLS: 2 6
ALARMS DISPATCHED:
ACTUAL FIRES
Structure - MH Commercial
Structure - MH Residential
Structure - Contract Areas
Vehicle - MH
Vehicle - Contract Areas
Grass/Brush/No Value MH
Grass/Brush/No Value Contract
MEDICAL
Assist
Extrication
HAZARDOUS SITUATION
Spills/Leaks
Arcing/Shorting
Chemical
Power Line Down
FALSE ALARM
Residential Malfunction
Commercial Malfunction
Unintentional - Commercial
Unintentional - Residential
Criminal
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare
Steam Mistaken for Smoke
Other
MUTUAL AID
TOTAL CALLS
NUMBER
1
3
3
8
1
2
2
1
2
2
1
26
STRUCTURE CONTENTS
MISC. TOTALS TO DATE
$25
$600
$17,300
TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES
$0
$0 $17,925
$25
$20,850
$2,900
$21,000
$12,000
FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH) $17,925
MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT/CONTENTS
MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS
MEND. HIS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE
$56,775
$15,000
$26,875
$41,875
BILLING FOR SERVICES
AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE
MN/DOT
MILW. RR
CNR RR
OTHERS:
LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2 4
MENDOTA 0
SUNFISH LAKE 0
LILYDALE 2
OTHER 0
TOTAL 2 6
187
15
15
25
5
247
LAST YEAR
TOTALS:
176
$0
$0
$0
$4,223
$0
$4,223
7
12
19
7
221
WORK PERFORMED HOURS
TO DATE LAST YEAR
FIRE CALLS 447 4589
MEETINGS 71 76 0
DRILLS 66 884.5
WEEKLY CLEAN-UP 8 4 1073
SPECIAL ACTIVITY 28.5 605
ADMINISTATIVE 54 1474
FIRE MARSHAL 6 0
3533.5
661
728
629
1109.5
1181
830.5 800.5
TOTALS 810.5 10216
8642.5
FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH
INSPECTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
RE -INSPECTION
MEETINGS
ADMINISTRATION
SPECIAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
14.5
13
24.5
60
REMARKS: SEE 011 -ER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS
FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY WORK PERFORMANCE FOR DECEMBER 1990
CALLS FOR MONTH
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
PERCENT
CLEAN
MONTHLY
GEN
OFFICER
RESCUE
ROOKIE
SPECIAL
26
CALLS
CALL
CALLSATTENDED
UP
DRILL
MTG
MTG
DRILL
DRILL
ACT.
YEAR TO DATE
ATT'D
HOURS
ATT'D
THIS
3
2
2
2
AD
247
MONTH
MONTH
YEAR
YEAR
HOURS
HOURS
HRS.
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HI
105
CHIEF John Maczko
13
12
101
41%
2
2
3
96
ASST. Bill Lerbs
20
20
130
53%
12
4
2
3
54
CAPT. Keith Stein
25
25
179
72%
6
2
2
3
Paul Dreelan
13
13
120
49%
3
2
2
Mike Coonan
10
10
129
52%
3
2
2
Gordy Skjerven
15
15
143
58%
3
2
2
4.5
Ed Adrian
15
15
147
60%
3
2
2
Jim Perron
12
12
126
51%
3
2
2
Mike Marscullio
7
7
54
22%
2
2
Tom Shields
16
16
133
54%
3
2
2
CAPT. R. McNamara
10
10
95
38%
4
Bill Chisler
6
6
91
37%
3
2
2
Marc Connolly
5
5
84
34%
2
Jamie Lerbs
18
18
139
56%
6
2
2
3
Dick Zwirn
. 15
15
112
45%
3
2
2
George Lowe
20
20
156
63%
6
4
2
3
Mike Johns
14
14
135
55%
3
2
2
Dave Dreelan
20
20
70
67%
3
2
2
0
0%
CAPT. Jeff Stenhaua
12
12
138
56%
2
2
3
Leroy Noack
16
16
146
59%
3
2
2
Lambert Derks
9
9
109
44%
2
2
George Noack Jr.
4
4
100
40%
2
Tom Olund
57
23%
2
Mike Maczko
12
12
128
52%
3
2
2
Aaron Coates
14
14
159
64%-
3
2
2
Mark Kaufman
19
19
59
56%
3
2
Walt Klarkowski
9
9
36
34%
3
2
2
CAPT. John Neska
16
16
187
76%
3
2
2
3
8
Tom Weinzettel
8
8
70
28%
3
2
2
Ted Husnik
13
13
90
36%
3
2
2
John Lapakko
18
18
153
62%
2
2
Jim Kilburg
20
20
132
53%
3
2
2
8
Pat Knight
35
14%
Kevin Perron
12
12
75
30%
6
2
2
8
Tim Oster
12
12
122
49%
3
2
2
Roy Kingsley
15
15
49
47%
3
2
TOTAL FOR MONTH
447
TOTAL ATTENDED
28
33
28
5
0
0
4
TOTAL FOR YEAR
4589
TOTAL MAN HOURS
84
66
56
15
0
0
28.5
THIS MONTH
LAST MONTH
LAST YEAR
AVE. RUNS/MAN
14.00
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
AVE. MEN/RUN
17.23
15.36
13.22
AVE % FOR YEAR
49.85
49.38
46.41
FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY WORK PERFORMANCE FOR DECEMBER 1990
CALLS FOR MONTH
FIRE
FIRE
FIRE
PERCENT
CLEAN
MONTHLY
GEN
OFFICER
RESCUE
ROOKIE
SPECIAL
26
CALLS
CALL
CALLSATTENDED
UP
DRILL
MTG
MTG
DRILL
DRILL
ACT.
YEAR TO DATE
ATT'D
HOURS
ATT'D
THIS
3
2
2
2
AD
247
MONTH
MONTH
YEAR
YEAR
HOURS
HOURS
HRS.
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HOURS
HI
105
CHIEF John Maczko
13
12
101
41%
2
2
3
96
ASST. Bill Lerbs
20
20
130
53%
12
4
2
3
54
CAPT. Keith Stein
25
25
179
72%
6
2
2
3
Paul Dreelan
13
13
120
49%
3
2
2
Mike Coonan
10
10
129
52%
3
2
2
Gordy Skjerven
15
15
143
58%
3
2
2
4.5
Ed Adrian
15
15
147
60%
3
2
2
Jim Perron
12
12
126
51%
3
2
2
Mike Marscullio
7
7
54
22%
2
2
Tom Shields
16
16
133
54%
3
2
2
CAPT. R. McNamara
10
10
95
38%
4
Bill Chisler
6
6
91
37%
3
2
2
Marc Connolly
5
5
84
34%
2
Jamie Lerbs
18
18
139
56%
6
2
2
3
Dick Zwirn
. 15
15
112
45%
3
2
2
George Lowe
20
20
156
63%
6
4
2
3
Mike Johns
14
14
135
55%
3
2
2
Dave Dreelan
20
20
70
67%
3
2
2
0
0%
CAPT. Jeff Stenhaua
12
12
138
56%
2
2
3
Leroy Noack
16
16
146
59%
3
2
2
Lambert Derks
9
9
109
44%
2
2
George Noack Jr.
4
4
100
40%
2
Tom Olund
57
23%
2
Mike Maczko
12
12
128
52%
3
2
2
Aaron Coates
14
14
159
64%-
3
2
2
Mark Kaufman
19
19
59
56%
3
2
Walt Klarkowski
9
9
36
34%
3
2
2
CAPT. John Neska
16
16
187
76%
3
2
2
3
8
Tom Weinzettel
8
8
70
28%
3
2
2
Ted Husnik
13
13
90
36%
3
2
2
John Lapakko
18
18
153
62%
2
2
Jim Kilburg
20
20
132
53%
3
2
2
8
Pat Knight
35
14%
Kevin Perron
12
12
75
30%
6
2
2
8
Tim Oster
12
12
122
49%
3
2
2
Roy Kingsley
15
15
49
47%
3
2
TOTAL FOR MONTH
447
TOTAL ATTENDED
28
33
28
5
0
0
4
TOTAL FOR YEAR
4589
TOTAL MAN HOURS
84
66
56
15
0
0
28.5
THIS MONTH
LAST MONTH
LAST YEAR
AVE. RUNS/MAN
14.00
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX
AVE. MEN/RUN
17.23
15.36
13.22
AVE % FOR YEAR
49.85
49.38
46.41
•
SYNOPSIS
The fire department responded to 26 calls during the month of
December. Although there was not much fire damage done in the
month of December it was a very busy month. We responded to four
calls that were classified as structure fires. The most serious of
which was to 716 Stanwich Lane on December 3rd. The department was
dispatched to a possible Christmas tree fire outside the residence
at this address. Upon fire department arrival there was a fire
that extended to the garage area of residence. Quick action by the
neighbor who called in the fire and the fire department making a
quick knock down prevented the fire from spreading to anything more
than the garage door. The cause of the fire was determined to be
ashes from a fireplace that had been cleaned out four hours earlier
and placed in a trash can. This is the second such fire we have
had this year with the same circumstances. Two of the remaining
calls were chimney fires and the fourth call was to a fire in the
girls locker room at Sibley High School. The fire had burned
itself out by the time the department arrived. However smoke did
have to be ventilated from the locker room. The fire was
determined to be intentionally set and school officials have
offered a reward for information leading to the arrest of the
individual(s) that started the fire.
The department also responded to two malicious calls, the
first of which was to Henry Sibley High School where school
officials apprehended the person responsible for pulling the alarm.
The person was suspended for five days. The second was at Beth
Jacob Synagogue where a child had enclosed himself in a closet and
was playing with matches. Thankfully no one was hurt in this
instance since the smoke detectors were sensitive enough to pick up
the smoke from the ignited matches.
TRAINING
The monthly departmental drill was spent with representatives
of Northern States Power Company. They presented a class on
electrical hazards for firefighters and the goal of this class was
to teach firefighters the hazards of electricity and to help
prevent them from being injured in an incident.
Monthly squad drills were spent viewing a video tape on
selecting and using fire streams which is part of the Firefighter
II and Firefighter III Series. The goal was to improve the
firefighter's knowledge and efficiency in using various nozzles and
various sized hose lines. The most important aspect taught was
that it was very important that a firefighter size up the situation
they are going into before they in fact attack the fire.
•
SYNOPSIS
The fire department responded to 26 calls during the month of
December. Although there was not much fire damage done in the
month of December it was a very busy month. We responded to four
calls that were classified as structure fires. The most serious of
which was to 716 Stanwich Lane on December 3rd. The department was
dispatched to a possible Christmas tree fire outside the residence
at this address. Upon fire department arrival there was a fire
that extended to the garage area of residence. Quick action by the
neighbor who called in the fire and the fire department making a
quick knock down prevented the fire from spreading to anything more
than the garage door. The cause of the fire was determined to be
ashes from a fireplace that had been cleaned out four hours earlier
and placed in a trash can. This is the second such fire we have
had this year with the same circumstances. Two of the remaining
calls were chimney fires and the fourth call was to a fire in the
girls locker room at Sibley High School. The fire had burned
itself out by the time the department arrived. However smoke did
have to be ventilated from the locker room. The fire was
determined to be intentionally set and school officials have
offered a reward for information leading to the arrest of the
individual(s) that started the fire.
The department also responded to two malicious calls, the
first of which was to Henry Sibley High School where school
officials apprehended the person responsible for pulling the alarm.
The person was suspended for five days. The second was at Beth
Jacob Synagogue where a child had enclosed himself in a closet and
was playing with matches. Thankfully no one was hurt in this
instance since the smoke detectors were sensitive enough to pick up
the smoke from the ignited matches.
TRAINING
The monthly departmental drill was spent with representatives
of Northern States Power Company. They presented a class on
electrical hazards for firefighters and the goal of this class was
to teach firefighters the hazards of electricity and to help
prevent them from being injured in an incident.
Monthly squad drills were spent viewing a video tape on
selecting and using fire streams which is part of the Firefighter
II and Firefighter III Series. The goal was to improve the
firefighter's knowledge and efficiency in using various nozzles and
various sized hose lines. The most important aspect taught was
that it was very important that a firefighter size up the situation
they are going into before they in fact attack the fire.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 27, 1990
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, November 27, 1990, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairperson Morson called the
meeting to order at 7:34 o'clock P.M. The following members were
present: Morson, Dwyer, Duggan, Koll and Dreelan. Commissioners
Tilsen and Krebsbach notified City staff that they would be late.
Also present were Planning Consultant Tim Malloy, Public Works
Director Jim Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder
and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
Commissioner Duggan moved approval of the October 23,
1990, minutes.
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO 90-41:
CALLAHAN -
WETLANDS PERMIT
Mr. and Mrs. Callahan, 1151 Warrior Drive, were both
present to discuss their request for a Wetlands Permit.
Mr. Callahan explained that they were novices regarding
the permit process. He stated that they have already
constructed a storage shed within the one hundred foot
(100') wetlands boundary without a building permit or a
wetlands permit. He stated that he is aware that City
staff has received complaints about the storage shed.
Mr. Callahan then showed the Planning Commission recent
pictures taken of the structure.
Chairperson Morson stated that he has been by the
structure and does not see it to be an eye -sore to the
neighborhood.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr.
Callahan explained that in order to move the shed, the
cement pad would have to be removed and that there really
is no feasible second choice as to where the structure
could be built. He explained that the shed would
encroach on lot lines and the setback requirements with
regard to his home.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
NOVEMBER 27, 1990
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was
held on Tuesday, November 27, 1990, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairperson Morson called the
meeting to order at 7:34 o'clock P.M. The following members were
present: Morson, Dwyer, Duggan, Koll and Dreelan. Commissioners
Tilsen and Krebsbach notified City staff that they would be late.
Also present were Planning Consultant Tim Malloy, Public Works
Director Jim Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder
and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
APPROVAL OF
MINUTES
Commissioner Duggan moved approval of the October 23,
1990, minutes.
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO 90-41:
CALLAHAN -
WETLANDS PERMIT
Mr. and Mrs. Callahan, 1151 Warrior Drive, were both
present to discuss their request for a Wetlands Permit.
Mr. Callahan explained that they were novices regarding
the permit process. He stated that they have already
constructed a storage shed within the one hundred foot
(100') wetlands boundary without a building permit or a
wetlands permit. He stated that he is aware that City
staff has received complaints about the storage shed.
Mr. Callahan then showed the Planning Commission recent
pictures taken of the structure.
Chairperson Morson stated that he has been by the
structure and does not see it to be an eye -sore to the
neighborhood.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr.
Callahan explained that in order to move the shed, the
cement pad would have to be removed and that there really
is no feasible second choice as to where the structure
could be built. He explained that the shed would
encroach on lot lines and the setback requirements with
regard to his home.
Commissioners Duggan and Koll stated that they would like
to see some screening done to the shed. They suggested
that planting of shrubbery would be an enhancement to the
shed.
Mr. Roy LaPean, 620 Callahan Place, was present to
discuss his concerns relating to the existing shed. He
explained that he has no problem with the appearance of
the shed. He stated that he is concerned with the level
of water within the wetlands area. Public Works Director
Danielson stated that the pond level is controlled by
storm water outlets. Mr. LaPean questioned where the
high water level is in the area. He further questioned
if a structure can be built on a City easement. Public
Works Director Danielson explained that if a structure is
built on a City easement and it is at the homeowner's
risk.
Mr. LaPean stated that he is concerned with the City's
policy of requiring applicants to obtain signatures of
consent from contiguous neighbors. He stated that this
requirement puts the neighbors in an awkward position
should they not agree with what the applicant is
requesting. He stated that he felt very intimidated with
the process.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to waive the required public
hearing.
Commissioner Roll seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Dwyer moved to recommend that the City
Council approve the granting of a Wetlands Permit to
allow the Callahan's storage shed to remain in place as
constructed.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
Commissioner Duggan offered a friendly amendment stating
that the recommend approval of granting the Wetlands
Permit should be subject to the planting a shrubbery
around the shed in the spring.
Mr. Callahan stated that he had
requirement.
Commissioners Dwyer and Koll both
amendment.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
no objection to this
accepted the friendly
4
Commissioners Duggan and Koll stated that they would like
to see some screening done to the shed. They suggested
that planting of shrubbery would be an enhancement to the
shed.
Mr. Roy LaPean, 620 Callahan Place, was present to
discuss his concerns relating to the existing shed. He
explained that he has no problem with the appearance of
the shed. He stated that he is concerned with the level
of water within the wetlands area. Public Works Director
Danielson stated that the pond level is controlled by
storm water outlets. Mr. LaPean questioned where the
high water level is in the area. He further questioned
if a structure can be built on a City easement. Public
Works Director Danielson explained that if a structure is
built on a City easement and it is at the homeowner's
risk.
Mr. LaPean stated that he is concerned with the City's
policy of requiring applicants to obtain signatures of
consent from contiguous neighbors. He stated that this
requirement puts the neighbors in an awkward position
should they not agree with what the applicant is
requesting. He stated that he felt very intimidated with
the process.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to waive the required public
hearing.
Commissioner Roll seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Dwyer moved to recommend that the City
Council approve the granting of a Wetlands Permit to
allow the Callahan's storage shed to remain in place as
constructed.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
Commissioner Duggan offered a friendly amendment stating
that the recommend approval of granting the Wetlands
Permit should be subject to the planting a shrubbery
around the shed in the spring.
Mr. Callahan stated that he had
requirement.
Commissioners Dwyer and Koll both
amendment.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
no objection to this
accepted the friendly
4
CASE NO. 90-43:
CENTRE POINTE MEDICAL CLINIC
SIGN VARIANCE
Ms. Sue Zwirner, Centre Pointe Medical Center, was
present to discuss their request for a sign variance.
She explained that the Clinic would like to install a
roof top banner advertising their business. She
explained that the Clinic is relatively new and that they
felt that a roof top banner sign would be more visible
from the highway. She explained that they anticipate the
sign being up for only three months. She showed the
Planning Commission a sample of the banner.
Chairperson Morson questioned if the sign is secured to
the building. Ms. Zwirner stated that the sign is tied
to the building.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he has no concerns with
the sign and that he realizes a smaller sign would not be
seen from the highway.
Commissioner Koll moved to recommend to the City Council
that they approve a sign variance allowing a seventy-five
(75) square foot sign area and allowing the sign to be
mounted on the roof for a period not to exceed three
months.
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
HEARING
CASE NO. 90-39:
R.A. PUTNAM -
MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Mr. Dick Putnam, R.A. Putnam and Associates, was present
to discuss his request for a Minor Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to construct a neighborhood commercial center,
child care and elderly housing for his ten (10) acre
tract of land at the corner of Dodd Road and Mendota
Height Road.
Mr. Putnam briefly reviewed the past history relative to
this site. He explained that five (5) years ago this
request was denied by the City Council. He stated
briefly that some of the reasons were because the School
District was in the process of selling their land to the
north of the site and that the City did not have a
"handle" on what to expect in the Southeast Area of the
City. He stated that the since that time, he has held
meetings with the Bridgeview Shores residents and
CASE NO. 90-43:
CENTRE POINTE MEDICAL CLINIC
SIGN VARIANCE
Ms. Sue Zwirner, Centre Pointe Medical Center, was
present to discuss their request for a sign variance.
She explained that the Clinic would like to install a
roof top banner advertising their business. She
explained that the Clinic is relatively new and that they
felt that a roof top banner sign would be more visible
from the highway. She explained that they anticipate the
sign being up for only three months. She showed the
Planning Commission a sample of the banner.
Chairperson Morson questioned if the sign is secured to
the building. Ms. Zwirner stated that the sign is tied
to the building.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he has no concerns with
the sign and that he realizes a smaller sign would not be
seen from the highway.
Commissioner Koll moved to recommend to the City Council
that they approve a sign variance allowing a seventy-five
(75) square foot sign area and allowing the sign to be
mounted on the roof for a period not to exceed three
months.
Commissioner Dwyer seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
HEARING
CASE NO. 90-39:
R.A. PUTNAM -
MINOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
Mr. Dick Putnam, R.A. Putnam and Associates, was present
to discuss his request for a Minor Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to construct a neighborhood commercial center,
child care and elderly housing for his ten (10) acre
tract of land at the corner of Dodd Road and Mendota
Height Road.
Mr. Putnam briefly reviewed the past history relative to
this site. He explained that five (5) years ago this
request was denied by the City Council. He stated
briefly that some of the reasons were because the School
District was in the process of selling their land to the
north of the site and that the City did not have a
"handle" on what to expect in the Southeast Area of the
City. He stated that the since that time, he has held
meetings with the Bridgeview Shores residents and
developer (old School District site) to communicate
concerns and suggestions of all involved. He explained
that traffic was a main concern and that the appearance
of the center was also a concern.
Mr. Putnam showed the Planning Commission the plans as
prepared by his Architects. He stated that he has not
heard any complaints regarding the appearance of the
center. He stated that the appearance of the center is
attractive due to the materials used i.e., brick, stucco
and wood shakes.
Mr. Putnam stated that at the October pre -application
meeting with the Planning Commission they stated that
they would like to see a traffic study completed before
they recommend approval or denial of the project. He
stated that since that time he has hired a traffic
consultant but that he has been unable to contact him
because of conflicts related to each being out of town.
He further explained that this particular site is a hard
site to construct single family homes on due to the air
noise problem and the traffic from the highway ramps. He
further explained that the shape of the land is a
difficult shape to work with. He stated that this shape
is an asset for commercial use.
In response to a question from Chairperson Morson, Mr.
Putnam stated that the easterly portion of the land is
planned for elderly housing. He explained that it would
not be used for a nursing home but retired or elderly
housing. He explained that the buildings would be one
story buildings and that the elevations would be the same
as the neighborhood complex. He explained that there are
a lot of trees on this portion of land. He briefly
explained a time frame for construction to the Planning
Commission. He explained that the time line could be put
together within the next month if the Comprehensive Plan
is approved. He further explained that PDQ is interested
being the anchor tenant in the site.
Commissioner Dreelan expressed her concerns about
constructing a commercial building with no tenants
interested. She used the Mendota Plaza has an example of
a building with no tenants. Mr. Putnam stated that the
key to getting tenants is to get a lead tenant. He
explained that PDQ potentially is the lead tenant for
this building.
Chairperson Morson questioned how many buildings Mr.
Putnam owns and operates. Mr. Putnam explained that he
owns and operates none. He explained that he is
presently working on two other sites in Minnetonka and
Eden Prairies. He explained that the financing is
structured through seventy percent (70%) pre -lease
developer (old School District site) to communicate
concerns and suggestions of all involved. He explained
that traffic was a main concern and that the appearance
of the center was also a concern.
Mr. Putnam showed the Planning Commission the plans as
prepared by his Architects. He stated that he has not
heard any complaints regarding the appearance of the
center. He stated that the appearance of the center is
attractive due to the materials used i.e., brick, stucco
and wood shakes.
Mr. Putnam stated that at the October pre -application
meeting with the Planning Commission they stated that
they would like to see a traffic study completed before
they recommend approval or denial of the project. He
stated that since that time he has hired a traffic
consultant but that he has been unable to contact him
because of conflicts related to each being out of town.
He further explained that this particular site is a hard
site to construct single family homes on due to the air
noise problem and the traffic from the highway ramps. He
further explained that the shape of the land is a
difficult shape to work with. He stated that this shape
is an asset for commercial use.
In response to a question from Chairperson Morson, Mr.
Putnam stated that the easterly portion of the land is
planned for elderly housing. He explained that it would
not be used for a nursing home but retired or elderly
housing. He explained that the buildings would be one
story buildings and that the elevations would be the same
as the neighborhood complex. He explained that there are
a lot of trees on this portion of land. He briefly
explained a time frame for construction to the Planning
Commission. He explained that the time line could be put
together within the next month if the Comprehensive Plan
is approved. He further explained that PDQ is interested
being the anchor tenant in the site.
Commissioner Dreelan expressed her concerns about
constructing a commercial building with no tenants
interested. She used the Mendota Plaza has an example of
a building with no tenants. Mr. Putnam stated that the
key to getting tenants is to get a lead tenant. He
explained that PDQ potentially is the lead tenant for
this building.
Chairperson Morson questioned how many buildings Mr.
Putnam owns and operates. Mr. Putnam explained that he
owns and operates none. He explained that he is
presently working on two other sites in Minnetonka and
Eden Prairies. He explained that the financing is
structured through seventy percent (70%) pre -lease
financing.
Commissioner Duggan expressed his concerns. He stated
that the concept for this commercial center has been
rejected by the Council twice. He stated that he does
not see that a feasibility study has been completed, no
lists of businesses for the building have been submitted,
no accurate or current soil conditions have been
currently surveyed, no tree survey, no submittal of soil
erosion plans. Commissioner Duggan stated that this site
could basically kill the planned "downtown Mendota
Heights" plan. He stated that he agrees that the design
is attractive. He further questioned if the number of
buildings on the site complies with ordinance
requirements. Commissioner Duggan further expressed his
concern with air noise. He stated that he has a personal
problem with changing the comprehensive plan as it has
been changed in 1985, 1987 and 1989. Commissioner Duggan
stated that rezoning would be foolhardy if the State,
County or City wished to acquire the land.
Mr. Putnam explained that what he has presented tonight
is what the residents and developer in the area requested
of him. He stated that the City needs to make a
determination as towhat they want to see constructed on
this site. He explained that this area has been assessed
for sewer and water. He stated that he offered to sell
this land to Mary Anderson Homes (since it is zoned R-1)
and Mary Anderson Homes did not want to purchase the land
due to the air noise and traffic noise problems. He
further explained that the neighborhood concerns are a
strong point with him.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that he is not convinced that
every Mendota Heights' gateway needs to be a commercial
center.
Commissioner Krebsbach arrived at 8:32 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that he agrees that the
building is attractive on paper and that he does not
believe it will look as attractive once it is
constructed. He explained that this is due to potential
sign clutter and the lights that would be used.
Mr. Putnam stated that there will be signs and that they
will be tastefully done in conjunction with the
architecture.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that there is a PDQ on Salem
Church Road in Inver Grove Heights whose building has a
lot of vacancies.
financing.
Commissioner Duggan expressed his concerns. He stated
that the concept for this commercial center has been
rejected by the Council twice. He stated that he does
not see that a feasibility study has been completed, no
lists of businesses for the building have been submitted,
no accurate or current soil conditions have been
currently surveyed, no tree survey, no submittal of soil
erosion plans. Commissioner Duggan stated that this site
could basically kill the planned "downtown Mendota
Heights" plan. He stated that he agrees that the design
is attractive. He further questioned if the number of
buildings on the site complies with ordinance
requirements. Commissioner Duggan further expressed his
concern with air noise. He stated that he has a personal
problem with changing the comprehensive plan as it has
been changed in 1985, 1987 and 1989. Commissioner Duggan
stated that rezoning would be foolhardy if the State,
County or City wished to acquire the land.
Mr. Putnam explained that what he has presented tonight
is what the residents and developer in the area requested
of him. He stated that the City needs to make a
determination as towhat they want to see constructed on
this site. He explained that this area has been assessed
for sewer and water. He stated that he offered to sell
this land to Mary Anderson Homes (since it is zoned R-1)
and Mary Anderson Homes did not want to purchase the land
due to the air noise and traffic noise problems. He
further explained that the neighborhood concerns are a
strong point with him.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that he is not convinced that
every Mendota Heights' gateway needs to be a commercial
center.
Commissioner Krebsbach arrived at 8:32 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that he agrees that the
building is attractive on paper and that he does not
believe it will look as attractive once it is
constructed. He explained that this is due to potential
sign clutter and the lights that would be used.
Mr. Putnam stated that there will be signs and that they
will be tastefully done in conjunction with the
architecture.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that there is a PDQ on Salem
Church Road in Inver Grove Heights whose building has a
lot of vacancies.
Commissioner Koll stated that she is concerned with the
potential competiveness this commercial building may
impose on the existing downtown Mendota Heights. She
stated that she would like to see a study pinpointing the
type of usage this commercial building anticipates. She
stated her concerns for the amount of traffic and the
hazards it may bring at the intersections.
Chairperson Morson stated that the question the City
needs to answer is if the City needs a commercial site of
this nature now. He stated that if the City defers this
request for another five years what will happen then.
Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if Mr. Putnam has
considered removing the restaurant. Mr. Putnam stated
that he could consider removing it but there has been
some interest in a pizza shop becoming a tenant.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she would like to see
some criteria established related to a possible
restaurant in this area. She stated that she does not
want to see advertising of a restaurant along I-494 that
would attract people off of that highway. Mr. Putnam
stated that he envisions the restaurant to be a family
type restaurant, such as a Perkins. He stated that if
this restaurant only serves the immediate area, it will
go broke. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that a national
chain restaurant is a "different feel" for Mendota
Heights than a delicatessen type restaurant. She
questioned if the plan is approved if the City will have
some control over the type of restaurant that will go in.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she does not feel the
City will receive a more attractively designed proposal.
Chairperson Morson opened the meeting to the public.
Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, stated that the
Commission should not be mislead by Mr. Putnam's talk in
not having the required plans submitted for Commission
review. He stated that he had not heard any
justification in changing the Comprehensive Plan of
Mendota Heights. Mr. Friel stated the Comprehensive Plan
has been revised enough, that it should not be changed as
it is relied upon by the community. Mr. Friel briefly
read copies of letters sent to the City. A letter dated
December 10, 1987 regarding potential traffic problems on
Dodd Road with regards to the new highway construction
and letter dated December 24, 1987 from MnDOT to Public
Works Director Danielson regarding potential traffic
concerns at Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road due to the
increase development in the Southeast Area of Mendota
Heights and in Eagan. He further stated that he would
like to see the Planning Commission recommend denial of
this project to the City Council. He further commented
that park acreage has dwindled in the Southeast Area from
Commissioner Koll stated that she is concerned with the
potential competiveness this commercial building may
impose on the existing downtown Mendota Heights. She
stated that she would like to see a study pinpointing the
type of usage this commercial building anticipates. She
stated her concerns for the amount of traffic and the
hazards it may bring at the intersections.
Chairperson Morson stated that the question the City
needs to answer is if the City needs a commercial site of
this nature now. He stated that if the City defers this
request for another five years what will happen then.
Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if Mr. Putnam has
considered removing the restaurant. Mr. Putnam stated
that he could consider removing it but there has been
some interest in a pizza shop becoming a tenant.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she would like to see
some criteria established related to a possible
restaurant in this area. She stated that she does not
want to see advertising of a restaurant along I-494 that
would attract people off of that highway. Mr. Putnam
stated that he envisions the restaurant to be a family
type restaurant, such as a Perkins. He stated that if
this restaurant only serves the immediate area, it will
go broke. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that a national
chain restaurant is a "different feel" for Mendota
Heights than a delicatessen type restaurant. She
questioned if the plan is approved if the City will have
some control over the type of restaurant that will go in.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she does not feel the
City will receive a more attractively designed proposal.
Chairperson Morson opened the meeting to the public.
Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican Lane, stated that the
Commission should not be mislead by Mr. Putnam's talk in
not having the required plans submitted for Commission
review. He stated that he had not heard any
justification in changing the Comprehensive Plan of
Mendota Heights. Mr. Friel stated the Comprehensive Plan
has been revised enough, that it should not be changed as
it is relied upon by the community. Mr. Friel briefly
read copies of letters sent to the City. A letter dated
December 10, 1987 regarding potential traffic problems on
Dodd Road with regards to the new highway construction
and letter dated December 24, 1987 from MnDOT to Public
Works Director Danielson regarding potential traffic
concerns at Dodd Road and Mendota Heights Road due to the
increase development in the Southeast Area of Mendota
Heights and in Eagan. He further stated that he would
like to see the Planning Commission recommend denial of
this project to the City Council. He further commented
that park acreage has dwindled in the Southeast Area from
80 to 20 acres.
Mr. Jim Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, re -enforced Mr.
Friel's feelings in not changing the Comprehensive Plan.
He explained that traffic is an issue. He explained that
there is not enough of a market for the elderly housing
that Mr. Putnam is proposing. He questioned that if this
plan is approved if it will turnout like the Duffy site
has, no construction. He stated that he would like to
see this request denied.
Mr. M. Grant, President of Mary Anderson Homes, stated
that Mr. Putnam did invite himself and the residents of
Bridgeview Shores to discuss his proposal. He explained
that Mr. Putnam has spent a lot of time in discussing
this issue with everyone. He stated that this issue is
very important to all of the residents. He explained
that Mr. Putnam has put special care into the design of
the buildings. He further stated that the residents have
discussed with Mr. Putnam the possibility of eliminating
the gas pumps and that the traffic increase is a concern.
Commissioner Dwyer questioned why Mary Anderson Homes is
not interested in constructing single family homes on
this land. Mr. Grant responded that this is a highly
traveled area and that noise is a real problem with
traffic on the highway ramp.
Commissioner Tilsen arrived at 9:06 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she would not like to
see a Perkins in this area. Mr. Grant stated that he did
not recall seeing a restaurant in the previous plans but
that he would rather see a restaurant in this location
than gas pumps. He stated that he feels that the Perkins
Restaurants are attractive. Commissioner Duggan restated
that traffic is a main concern and that is what should be
considered a problem. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that
she is concerned with advertising along the freeways.
Mr. Grant stated that he is concerned with any future
development in this area.
Mr. Craig Olson, resident of Kensington, stated that he
feels that this is a beautiful, small shopping center and
that he cannot see why anyone would object to this
project. Mr. Olson stated this beautifully designed
commerical center is similar to what you would see at a
Martha's Vineyard or Cape Cod. He stated that he cannot
believe that people can be so out of touch with reality.
He stated that he would rather see this proposal than
what we see at Dodd Road and Highway 110. He stated most
of the traffic would be local.
80 to 20 acres.
Mr. Jim Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, re -enforced Mr.
Friel's feelings in not changing the Comprehensive Plan.
He explained that traffic is an issue. He explained that
there is not enough of a market for the elderly housing
that Mr. Putnam is proposing. He questioned that if this
plan is approved if it will turnout like the Duffy site
has, no construction. He stated that he would like to
see this request denied.
Mr. M. Grant, President of Mary Anderson Homes, stated
that Mr. Putnam did invite himself and the residents of
Bridgeview Shores to discuss his proposal. He explained
that Mr. Putnam has spent a lot of time in discussing
this issue with everyone. He stated that this issue is
very important to all of the residents. He explained
that Mr. Putnam has put special care into the design of
the buildings. He further stated that the residents have
discussed with Mr. Putnam the possibility of eliminating
the gas pumps and that the traffic increase is a concern.
Commissioner Dwyer questioned why Mary Anderson Homes is
not interested in constructing single family homes on
this land. Mr. Grant responded that this is a highly
traveled area and that noise is a real problem with
traffic on the highway ramp.
Commissioner Tilsen arrived at 9:06 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she would not like to
see a Perkins in this area. Mr. Grant stated that he did
not recall seeing a restaurant in the previous plans but
that he would rather see a restaurant in this location
than gas pumps. He stated that he feels that the Perkins
Restaurants are attractive. Commissioner Duggan restated
that traffic is a main concern and that is what should be
considered a problem. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that
she is concerned with advertising along the freeways.
Mr. Grant stated that he is concerned with any future
development in this area.
Mr. Craig Olson, resident of Kensington, stated that he
feels that this is a beautiful, small shopping center and
that he cannot see why anyone would object to this
project. Mr. Olson stated this beautifully designed
commerical center is similar to what you would see at a
Martha's Vineyard or Cape Cod. He stated that he cannot
believe that people can be so out of touch with reality.
He stated that he would rather see this proposal than
what we see at Dodd Road and Highway 110. He stated most
of the traffic would be local.
Mr. Tom Smith, Hampshire resident, stated that he is
concerned with the increase of traffic.
Mr. Steve Patrick, 737 Mendota Heights Road, stated that
he owns land next to Mr. Putnam's request. He stated
that he is concerned with the best possible use of this
land. He stated that he agrees with Mr. Putnam that this
site is best suited for commercial. He further stated
that he too would like to see a traffic analysis. He
commended Mr. Putnam on the architecture of the
buildings.
In response to Commissioner Krebsbach's question, Mr.
Patrick stated that he was here several years ago when
Mr. Putnam presented his request and at that time he was
in favor of his request. He stated that his concerns are
related to the traffic impact.
Commissioner Duggan requested that City staff receive in
writing from MnDOT information regarding the traffic
analysis.
Mr. Flicek, 2493 Bridgeview Court, stated that he is
concerned with the lighting and signage for the
buildings. He further stated that the gas pumps and
traffic are also major concerns.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Motion fails due to lack of second.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to continue the public hearing
to further discuss traffic and feasibility studies to
January 22, 1991, at 7:45 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 1, MORSON
Chairperson Morson stated that he would like to have seen
this request acted on tonight.
HEARING:
CASE NO. 90-03:
CENTEX HOMES - KENSINGTON PUD -
COMPROMISE PLAN
Commissioner Duggan addressed the Planning Commission by
stating that he is not clear with what is being presented
by the developer as a compromise plan. He stated that
the plan that was originally presented for Kensington
Phase II was rejected. He stated that there then cannot
be a compromise plan. He stated his concerns regarding
Mr. Tom Smith, Hampshire resident, stated that he is
concerned with the increase of traffic.
Mr. Steve Patrick, 737 Mendota Heights Road, stated that
he owns land next to Mr. Putnam's request. He stated
that he is concerned with the best possible use of this
land. He stated that he agrees with Mr. Putnam that this
site is best suited for commercial. He further stated
that he too would like to see a traffic analysis. He
commended Mr. Putnam on the architecture of the
buildings.
In response to Commissioner Krebsbach's question, Mr.
Patrick stated that he was here several years ago when
Mr. Putnam presented his request and at that time he was
in favor of his request. He stated that his concerns are
related to the traffic impact.
Commissioner Duggan requested that City staff receive in
writing from MnDOT information regarding the traffic
analysis.
Mr. Flicek, 2493 Bridgeview Court, stated that he is
concerned with the lighting and signage for the
buildings. He further stated that the gas pumps and
traffic are also major concerns.
Commissioner Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Motion fails due to lack of second.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to continue the public hearing
to further discuss traffic and feasibility studies to
January 22, 1991, at 7:45 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Krebsbach seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 1, MORSON
Chairperson Morson stated that he would like to have seen
this request acted on tonight.
HEARING:
CASE NO. 90-03:
CENTEX HOMES - KENSINGTON PUD -
COMPROMISE PLAN
Commissioner Duggan addressed the Planning Commission by
stating that he is not clear with what is being presented
by the developer as a compromise plan. He stated that
the plan that was originally presented for Kensington
Phase II was rejected. He stated that there then cannot
be a compromise plan. He stated his concerns regarding
the legality of using an old planning case number for a
compromise plan. He further questioned if the legal
description advertised is the correct legal description
for the compromise plan. He stated that there is a large
vagueness in clarity with respect to the current
compromise plan and that he would like to see legal
clarification. He recommended that the. Planning
Commission table this request to January. Chairperson
Morson responded that through the course of the public
hearing tonight most of these questions will be answered.
Mr. Thomas Boyce, Centex Homes, briefly summarized what
Centex's request is at the present time. He stated that
they have looked at a number of alternatives and have
decided to submit a compromise plan. Mr. Boyce stated
that originally Centex failed to achieve a rezoning
because the super majority 4/5's vote at the Council
level was not achieved. He stated that the other
original items were never voted on.
Mr. Boyce explained that Centex has proposed a compromise
plan to the City Council to see if they thought it was
worth pursuing and they told Centex that it was and that
is why we are here tonight. He stated that he understood
that the City Council has told the Planning Commission
that they would like you to review the compromise plan.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder concurred that
Council had directed staff and the Planning Commission to
review the plan.
Mr. Boyce explained that Centex has come up with a
proposed revised plan for the area. He explained that
since they have talked to the City Council they have met
with the neighbors and that the plan has gone through
some revisions since the meeting with the neighbors.
Mr. Boyce briefly explained the previous plans with
respect to where the park was located along with the
townhouses and coachhomes. He explained that they have
shifted the townhouses and condominiums over adjacent to
the existing manor homes project and reduce the total
numbers. He further explained that they have now
introduced a smaller single family lot. He stated that
the smallest lot is approximately 10,000 square feet with
the average of 17,000 square feet. He stated that the
result in the compromise plan is a reduction in density
of approximately 100 units and that there are now single
family homes adjacent to the existing single family homes
and that the coachhomes are now up along the freeway.
Mr. Boyce explained the changes in the compromise plan
that have occurred after their meeting with the
neighborhood. He explained that the intersection that
lined up with Park Lane has been changed to having the
the legality of using an old planning case number for a
compromise plan. He further questioned if the legal
description advertised is the correct legal description
for the compromise plan. He stated that there is a large
vagueness in clarity with respect to the current
compromise plan and that he would like to see legal
clarification. He recommended that the. Planning
Commission table this request to January. Chairperson
Morson responded that through the course of the public
hearing tonight most of these questions will be answered.
Mr. Thomas Boyce, Centex Homes, briefly summarized what
Centex's request is at the present time. He stated that
they have looked at a number of alternatives and have
decided to submit a compromise plan. Mr. Boyce stated
that originally Centex failed to achieve a rezoning
because the super majority 4/5's vote at the Council
level was not achieved. He stated that the other
original items were never voted on.
Mr. Boyce explained that Centex has proposed a compromise
plan to the City Council to see if they thought it was
worth pursuing and they told Centex that it was and that
is why we are here tonight. He stated that he understood
that the City Council has told the Planning Commission
that they would like you to review the compromise plan.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder concurred that
Council had directed staff and the Planning Commission to
review the plan.
Mr. Boyce explained that Centex has come up with a
proposed revised plan for the area. He explained that
since they have talked to the City Council they have met
with the neighbors and that the plan has gone through
some revisions since the meeting with the neighbors.
Mr. Boyce briefly explained the previous plans with
respect to where the park was located along with the
townhouses and coachhomes. He explained that they have
shifted the townhouses and condominiums over adjacent to
the existing manor homes project and reduce the total
numbers. He further explained that they have now
introduced a smaller single family lot. He stated that
the smallest lot is approximately 10,000 square feet with
the average of 17,000 square feet. He stated that the
result in the compromise plan is a reduction in density
of approximately 100 units and that there are now single
family homes adjacent to the existing single family homes
and that the coachhomes are now up along the freeway.
Mr. Boyce explained the changes in the compromise plan
that have occurred after their meeting with the
neighborhood. He explained that the intersection that
lined up with Park Lane has been changed to having the
intersection sandwiched in between Hampshire Drive and
Park Lane so that there will be no through traffic on
either Hampshire Drive and Park Lane. He further
explained that they have tried to limit the amount of
traffic from the park.
Commissioner Tilsen questioned what the lot sizes per
house types are. Mr. Boyce responded that the mix is
roughly 42 15,000 square foot lots which will be built
like the Copperfield Addition. He explained that the
other 79 lots will be less than 15,000 square foot with
reduced side yard setbacks and that they have tried to
limit the house size. Mr. Boyce stated that they are
trying to build smaller houses on smaller lots.
Commissioner Tilsen stated that he has talked to people
who live in the Fairfield area (development in Eden
Prairie similar to the one Centex is now proposing) who
felt that their impression of their addition was supposed
to be more upscale type homes. He stated that they felt
that that was due to the mix of lot size and home size.
Commissioner Duggan stated that the plan submitted
tonight is incomplete and he sited the following reasons
why:
1. has not seen the total acreage of the pond, streets
and park dedication.
2. why are we being asked to consider smaller lots when
the City Ordinance calls for 15,000 square foot lots.
3. why are we asked to grant wholesale variances and
wetlands permits.
4. why haven't we been invited with the Parks and
Recreation Commission to select the ten (10) acres in
park dedication as our City Ordinance suggests that
we are entitled to.
5. we have not received drawings with respect to the
trees.
6. what is the net acreage of this project?
7. what provisions have been taken to reserve the unique
natural amenities and wooden coverage?
8: the plans submitted tonight are supposed to satisfy
the requirements of the subdivision control ordinance
for preliminary and final plats. He inquired about
what tells the Commission that the applicant's PUD
will produce an environment of equal or superior
quality to what the City currently has.
intersection sandwiched in between Hampshire Drive and
Park Lane so that there will be no through traffic on
either Hampshire Drive and Park Lane. He further
explained that they have tried to limit the amount of
traffic from the park.
Commissioner Tilsen questioned what the lot sizes per
house types are. Mr. Boyce responded that the mix is
roughly 42 15,000 square foot lots which will be built
like the Copperfield Addition. He explained that the
other 79 lots will be less than 15,000 square foot with
reduced side yard setbacks and that they have tried to
limit the house size. Mr. Boyce stated that they are
trying to build smaller houses on smaller lots.
Commissioner Tilsen stated that he has talked to people
who live in the Fairfield area (development in Eden
Prairie similar to the one Centex is now proposing) who
felt that their impression of their addition was supposed
to be more upscale type homes. He stated that they felt
that that was due to the mix of lot size and home size.
Commissioner Duggan stated that the plan submitted
tonight is incomplete and he sited the following reasons
why:
1. has not seen the total acreage of the pond, streets
and park dedication.
2. why are we being asked to consider smaller lots when
the City Ordinance calls for 15,000 square foot lots.
3. why are we asked to grant wholesale variances and
wetlands permits.
4. why haven't we been invited with the Parks and
Recreation Commission to select the ten (10) acres in
park dedication as our City Ordinance suggests that
we are entitled to.
5. we have not received drawings with respect to the
trees.
6. what is the net acreage of this project?
7. what provisions have been taken to reserve the unique
natural amenities and wooden coverage?
8: the plans submitted tonight are supposed to satisfy
the requirements of the subdivision control ordinance
for preliminary and final plats. He inquired about
what tells the Commission that the applicant's PUD
will produce an environment of equal or superior
quality to what the City currently has.
He further questioned what tells the Commission that the
applicant's PUD will not constitute a threat to the
safety, health and welfare of adjacent landowners and the
people in the community. What provisions are offered to
provide open space and park land for the residents in
this area. He further questioned the length of proposed
cul-de-sacs.
Mr. Boyce responded that the total acreage is the same as
the previous plan. He stated that the pond acreage is
the same. Mr. Boyce stated that they will get
information on the sizes of the streets and cul-de-sacs.
Commissioner Duggan questioned whether the Police and
Engineering Departments have had a chance to study what
impact the narrower streets will have. Mr. Boyce
responded that the staff has reviewed the plan.
Mr. Putnam, a developer partner, explained that they have
asked the City to look at street standards similar to
other communities i.e., surmountable curbs, right of
ways. Mr. Putnam stated that City staff has been very
good in looking at changes. He explained that the fifty
foot (50') streets and surmountable curb is something
they are asking the City to review and if they do not
like it, it won't be done. He stated that they are
asking for things that will save the homeowner money.
Commissioner Duggan commented that the City Council is
not enamored of surmountable curbs. Mr. Putnam responded
that they are being criticized for asking questions and
proposing ideas.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he is not comfortable
with the sideyard setbacks proposed. He stated that we
already have that feeling in Copperfield and in
Hampshire. He explained that at this point he does not
like the word "compromise" and that he wants a reasonable
and complete plan. Commissioner Duggan stated that it is
his understanding, through City Ordinances, that the
Planning Commission can determine the amount of park
dedication acreage can be. Commissioner Duggan
questioned what will be done with the power lines with
respect to the construction of homes.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he would like to see the
park up next to Mendota Heights Road next to the
Hagstrom-King Park. Mr. Boyce responded that they have
talked to most of the neighbors and they prefer to have
the park up along the freeway. Commissioner Duggan
stated that a park would make the most sense where all of
the trees are presently located. Commissioner Duggan
stated that he wants to see drawings relating to trees
with respect to type, size and health. Mr. Boyce stated
that the drawings are the same as the previous plan and
Commissioner Duggan stated that he has never seen them.
He further questioned what tells the Commission that the
applicant's PUD will not constitute a threat to the
safety, health and welfare of adjacent landowners and the
people in the community. What provisions are offered to
provide open space and park land for the residents in
this area. He further questioned the length of proposed
cul-de-sacs.
Mr. Boyce responded that the total acreage is the same as
the previous plan. He stated that the pond acreage is
the same. Mr. Boyce stated that they will get
information on the sizes of the streets and cul-de-sacs.
Commissioner Duggan questioned whether the Police and
Engineering Departments have had a chance to study what
impact the narrower streets will have. Mr. Boyce
responded that the staff has reviewed the plan.
Mr. Putnam, a developer partner, explained that they have
asked the City to look at street standards similar to
other communities i.e., surmountable curbs, right of
ways. Mr. Putnam stated that City staff has been very
good in looking at changes. He explained that the fifty
foot (50') streets and surmountable curb is something
they are asking the City to review and if they do not
like it, it won't be done. He stated that they are
asking for things that will save the homeowner money.
Commissioner Duggan commented that the City Council is
not enamored of surmountable curbs. Mr. Putnam responded
that they are being criticized for asking questions and
proposing ideas.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he is not comfortable
with the sideyard setbacks proposed. He stated that we
already have that feeling in Copperfield and in
Hampshire. He explained that at this point he does not
like the word "compromise" and that he wants a reasonable
and complete plan. Commissioner Duggan stated that it is
his understanding, through City Ordinances, that the
Planning Commission can determine the amount of park
dedication acreage can be. Commissioner Duggan
questioned what will be done with the power lines with
respect to the construction of homes.
Commissioner Duggan stated that he would like to see the
park up next to Mendota Heights Road next to the
Hagstrom-King Park. Mr. Boyce responded that they have
talked to most of the neighbors and they prefer to have
the park up along the freeway. Commissioner Duggan
stated that a park would make the most sense where all of
the trees are presently located. Commissioner Duggan
stated that he wants to see drawings relating to trees
with respect to type, size and health. Mr. Boyce stated
that the drawings are the same as the previous plan and
Commissioner Duggan stated that he has never seen them.
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr.
Boyce stated that the total amount of acreage is the same
as the previous plan. Commissioner Duggan stated that he
is very confused with respect to how the acreage can be
the same as the previous plan.
Parks and Recreation Commission Chair John Huber was
present to discuss how the ten (10) acres of park land
might be arrived at within the new compromise plan Centex
is proposing. He pointed out that the City has recently
purchased the Mendakota Park site (land south of
Mendakota Golf Course) and that that particular site does
change the strategy of park use within the City. He
explained that Mr. Boyce and Mr. Putnam presented the
proposed park land within the Kensington Phase II at the
November Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. He
stated that they were not looking for approval of the
park land but that they were just looking for reaction
from the Parks and Recreation Commission. Parks
Chairperson Huber stated that he would like to see the
park up along Mendota Heights Road but that he
understands the problem of, constructing single family
homes along the freeway. He further stated that he would
like to see one parcel of park land instead of two
parcels. He stated that Parks and Recreation Commission
did not give the developers much of a reaction to the
proposed park land. He stated that it is less land than
before.
Commissioner Tilsen stated that the Parks and Recreation
Commission and the Planning Commission can come up with
a recommendation of where the ten acres of park land can
be. Parks and Recreation Chairperson Huber stated that
the neighbors that live in the area are not overly keen
with having a large park area across the street from
where they live.
Commissioner Duggan stated that we do not have a
sufficient amount of park land in the City. He stated
that we are supposed to have 189 acres of park land
within the community and we are short.
Chairperson Morson stated that the developer should take
into account the need for some park areas that are not
necessarily ball areas but areas for picnic and shade.
Commissioner Duggan stated that Mendota Heights is
different than most communities. He stated that there is
no more of Mendota Heights to develop. He stated that we
should take the best acreage to develop park land. He
stated that the applicant's PUD doesn't tell us that
they will produce an environment of equal or superior
quality to what we have. He stated that this is stated
In response to a question from Commissioner Duggan, Mr.
Boyce stated that the total amount of acreage is the same
as the previous plan. Commissioner Duggan stated that he
is very confused with respect to how the acreage can be
the same as the previous plan.
Parks and Recreation Commission Chair John Huber was
present to discuss how the ten (10) acres of park land
might be arrived at within the new compromise plan Centex
is proposing. He pointed out that the City has recently
purchased the Mendakota Park site (land south of
Mendakota Golf Course) and that that particular site does
change the strategy of park use within the City. He
explained that Mr. Boyce and Mr. Putnam presented the
proposed park land within the Kensington Phase II at the
November Parks and Recreation Commission meeting. He
stated that they were not looking for approval of the
park land but that they were just looking for reaction
from the Parks and Recreation Commission. Parks
Chairperson Huber stated that he would like to see the
park up along Mendota Heights Road but that he
understands the problem of, constructing single family
homes along the freeway. He further stated that he would
like to see one parcel of park land instead of two
parcels. He stated that Parks and Recreation Commission
did not give the developers much of a reaction to the
proposed park land. He stated that it is less land than
before.
Commissioner Tilsen stated that the Parks and Recreation
Commission and the Planning Commission can come up with
a recommendation of where the ten acres of park land can
be. Parks and Recreation Chairperson Huber stated that
the neighbors that live in the area are not overly keen
with having a large park area across the street from
where they live.
Commissioner Duggan stated that we do not have a
sufficient amount of park land in the City. He stated
that we are supposed to have 189 acres of park land
within the community and we are short.
Chairperson Morson stated that the developer should take
into account the need for some park areas that are not
necessarily ball areas but areas for picnic and shade.
Commissioner Duggan stated that Mendota Heights is
different than most communities. He stated that there is
no more of Mendota Heights to develop. He stated that we
should take the best acreage to develop park land. He
stated that the applicant's PUD doesn't tell us that
they will produce an environment of equal or superior
quality to what we have. He stated that this is stated
in the City Ordinance (19.2-6). Commissioner Duggan
stated that the City should have 18.98 acres of park land
per every 1200 people assuming a population of 12,000.
He stated that in rushing in and making a decision is
going against the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Duggan stated that the City is not even
close to the amount of park land that we are suppose to
have. Public Works Director Danielson stated that that
is not true and that the City now has close to 200 acres
of park land. Commissioner Duggan stated that he would
like to see a formal count of park acreage on paper.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she would like to have
a report from the community meeting between the residents
and the developer. Commissioner Krebsbach commended the
developer in coming back with a plan that is a workable
plan. She stated that her concerns are the single family
units that are currently being proposed. She stated that
the character of the neighborhood will not be of the same
standards as other parts of the community in which you
have developed. She questioned what kind of compromises
the City and the developer can come up. She stated that
she would like to see more of a mix of homes throughout
the area with lots that are smaller. Mr. Boyce stated
that that is what they have tried to do. He stated that
the smallest lots proposed are up against the power
lines. He stated that he doesn't think that they would
be the most valuable lots in the City because of the
power lines. He stated that they have tried to provide
relatively large lots where it makes sense. Commissioner
Krebsbach stated that she would like to see the developer
keep the City standards with this project with respect to
lot size. Mr. Boyce stated that they cannot make that
work financially.
In response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Mr.
Boyce stated that there will be some three car garages.
He explained that they are not trying to develop this
area like Hampshire Estates. He explained that they are
trying to appeal to a different market.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she is not visualizing
this area as a "good looking" area. She stated that she
is not sure that this is the best possible design for
this area. Mr. Boyce explained that the proposed lots
are smaller in nature but that they are wider.
Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if the developer would
be willing to pull lots out of the proposal. Mr. Boyce
stated that if it makes sense, yes. Commissioner
Krebsbach stated that she would like to have some time to
review the plan further so that the City can consider the
best plan for this land.
Chairperson Morson pointed out other developments in the
in the City Ordinance (19.2-6). Commissioner Duggan
stated that the City should have 18.98 acres of park land
per every 1200 people assuming a population of 12,000.
He stated that in rushing in and making a decision is
going against the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Duggan stated that the City is not even
close to the amount of park land that we are suppose to
have. Public Works Director Danielson stated that that
is not true and that the City now has close to 200 acres
of park land. Commissioner Duggan stated that he would
like to see a formal count of park acreage on paper.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she would like to have
a report from the community meeting between the residents
and the developer. Commissioner Krebsbach commended the
developer in coming back with a plan that is a workable
plan. She stated that her concerns are the single family
units that are currently being proposed. She stated that
the character of the neighborhood will not be of the same
standards as other parts of the community in which you
have developed. She questioned what kind of compromises
the City and the developer can come up. She stated that
she would like to see more of a mix of homes throughout
the area with lots that are smaller. Mr. Boyce stated
that that is what they have tried to do. He stated that
the smallest lots proposed are up against the power
lines. He stated that he doesn't think that they would
be the most valuable lots in the City because of the
power lines. He stated that they have tried to provide
relatively large lots where it makes sense. Commissioner
Krebsbach stated that she would like to see the developer
keep the City standards with this project with respect to
lot size. Mr. Boyce stated that they cannot make that
work financially.
In response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Mr.
Boyce stated that there will be some three car garages.
He explained that they are not trying to develop this
area like Hampshire Estates. He explained that they are
trying to appeal to a different market.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she is not visualizing
this area as a "good looking" area. She stated that she
is not sure that this is the best possible design for
this area. Mr. Boyce explained that the proposed lots
are smaller in nature but that they are wider.
Commissioner Krebsbach questioned if the developer would
be willing to pull lots out of the proposal. Mr. Boyce
stated that if it makes sense, yes. Commissioner
Krebsbach stated that she would like to have some time to
review the plan further so that the City can consider the
best plan for this land.
Chairperson Morson pointed out other developments in the
City with large homes on smaller lots. He stated that
these developments look totally out of proportion. He
stated that what the developer is trying to do is use
smaller sized homes on smaller lots and that that is nice
to see. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she is
concerned with the amount of grading that will be done.
She stated that she would like to see as much vegetation
remain as possible. Mr. Boyce stated that the feeling
that he is getting is that he is proposing a "leper
town". He stated that what Centex is proposing is a
variety of houses. He explained that the market is there
for these type of homes. Commissioner Krebsbach stated
that Mendota Heights has remained an attractive area
because we have kept the 15,000 square foot lots.
Chairperson Morson questioned if the developer will put
restrictions on the type of home that will be constructed
on a smaller lot. Mr. Boyce stated that they are willing
to do that and that they will put that into a Developer's
Agreement.
Chairperson Morson questioned if there will be separate
associations for each area of development (townhomes,
coachhomes, etc). Mr. Boyce stated that they could.
Chairperson Morson stated that he is trying to relieve
the conflicts between the types of homes with separate
associations.
Chairperson Morson stated that he is concerned with the
areas that are open, such as between the different
associations. Mr. Boyce stated that each association
will take care of the land.
Chairperson Morson stated that he has asked Public Works
Director Danielson to pursue other studies from separate
agencies relating to the power lines.
Mr. Boyce explained that it is not their intention, at
this point in time, to sell the lots to other builders.
Chairperson Morson stated that he wants to be sure that
the consistency between the previous plan and the current
plan, relating to the garages, etc., is kept and
requested that the developer note that in his plans
before a recommendation is given by the Planning
Commission.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated her concerns with respect
to how the market will be able to handle selling of
higher priced homes with lower priced homes near by.
Commissioner Dreelan stated that she is concerned with
the proposed lots that are less than 15,000 square feet.
She stated that seventy-nine (79) lots are a lot of lots
that do not meet the minimum requirements of the City's
City with large homes on smaller lots. He stated that
these developments look totally out of proportion. He
stated that what the developer is trying to do is use
smaller sized homes on smaller lots and that that is nice
to see. Commissioner Krebsbach stated that she is
concerned with the amount of grading that will be done.
She stated that she would like to see as much vegetation
remain as possible. Mr. Boyce stated that the feeling
that he is getting is that he is proposing a "leper
town". He stated that what Centex is proposing is a
variety of houses. He explained that the market is there
for these type of homes. Commissioner Krebsbach stated
that Mendota Heights has remained an attractive area
because we have kept the 15,000 square foot lots.
Chairperson Morson questioned if the developer will put
restrictions on the type of home that will be constructed
on a smaller lot. Mr. Boyce stated that they are willing
to do that and that they will put that into a Developer's
Agreement.
Chairperson Morson questioned if there will be separate
associations for each area of development (townhomes,
coachhomes, etc). Mr. Boyce stated that they could.
Chairperson Morson stated that he is trying to relieve
the conflicts between the types of homes with separate
associations.
Chairperson Morson stated that he is concerned with the
areas that are open, such as between the different
associations. Mr. Boyce stated that each association
will take care of the land.
Chairperson Morson stated that he has asked Public Works
Director Danielson to pursue other studies from separate
agencies relating to the power lines.
Mr. Boyce explained that it is not their intention, at
this point in time, to sell the lots to other builders.
Chairperson Morson stated that he wants to be sure that
the consistency between the previous plan and the current
plan, relating to the garages, etc., is kept and
requested that the developer note that in his plans
before a recommendation is given by the Planning
Commission.
Commissioner Krebsbach stated her concerns with respect
to how the market will be able to handle selling of
higher priced homes with lower priced homes near by.
Commissioner Dreelan stated that she is concerned with
the proposed lots that are less than 15,000 square feet.
She stated that seventy-nine (79) lots are a lot of lots
that do not meet the minimum requirements of the City's
Ordinances. She stated that she is concerned with the
buffering between the expensive and inexpensive homes.
She stated that she would like to see the park extended
so that less homes are impacted by the power lines.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that he would like to see some
verification from the school district that they will be
able to handle the amount of children this project could
generate. Mr. Boyce explained that the school district
has done some research on this issue and he passed out
some correspondence from the school district relating to
this question. Commissioner Dwyer stated that he would
like to see correspondence from NSP addressing the power
line issue.
Commissioner Dwyer questioned if the multi -family
dwellings will have the same amenities as the previous
multi -family proposal. Mr. Boyce responded that they
would have the same amenities but that there will not be
a club/recreational house. Commissioner Dwyer expressed
his concern that building the homes around the pond will
damage the trees. He stated that it will be unacceptable
if the trees are destroyed. He stated that he would be
much more amenable to this project if somehow the land is
reverted back to a park situation. Mr. Boyce stated that
they cannot not do that. He stated that they have
discussed the concept of having park land around the
ponds (like in Copperfield and Hampshire) and that the
residents were not happy in having trails in their single
family backyard. He stated that they have no problem in
platting a scenic easement, to include trees, around the
pond. Commissioner Dwyer stated that he would be
inclined to vote against this proposal if the trees
cannot be shared by all residents living in Mendota
Heights. He further stated he does not want to see this
neighborhood overly crowded. He stated that with the
sideyard setbacks proposed, the area will look crowded.
Commissioner Koll questioned that it is a foregone
conclusion that this is the last scenario verses
litigation. She stated that Mendota Heights has the
theme of spaciousness and graciousness and there is no
way that this kind of development with upscale "ticky
tackles" will fit that image. Planner Malloy stated that
the Planning Commission should not burden themselves in
making a decision one way or another with the possibility
of litigation. He stated that the Commission has a
responsibility to the community to see that the best
possible plan, based on the comprehensive plan and City
ordinance, is arrived at.
Planner Malloy explained that the Metropolitan Council
has made recommendations to all of the communities to
"kick in" their fair share of low-cost, affordable
Ordinances. She stated that she is concerned with the
buffering between the expensive and inexpensive homes.
She stated that she would like to see the park extended
so that less homes are impacted by the power lines.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that he would like to see some
verification from the school district that they will be
able to handle the amount of children this project could
generate. Mr. Boyce explained that the school district
has done some research on this issue and he passed out
some correspondence from the school district relating to
this question. Commissioner Dwyer stated that he would
like to see correspondence from NSP addressing the power
line issue.
Commissioner Dwyer questioned if the multi -family
dwellings will have the same amenities as the previous
multi -family proposal. Mr. Boyce responded that they
would have the same amenities but that there will not be
a club/recreational house. Commissioner Dwyer expressed
his concern that building the homes around the pond will
damage the trees. He stated that it will be unacceptable
if the trees are destroyed. He stated that he would be
much more amenable to this project if somehow the land is
reverted back to a park situation. Mr. Boyce stated that
they cannot not do that. He stated that they have
discussed the concept of having park land around the
ponds (like in Copperfield and Hampshire) and that the
residents were not happy in having trails in their single
family backyard. He stated that they have no problem in
platting a scenic easement, to include trees, around the
pond. Commissioner Dwyer stated that he would be
inclined to vote against this proposal if the trees
cannot be shared by all residents living in Mendota
Heights. He further stated he does not want to see this
neighborhood overly crowded. He stated that with the
sideyard setbacks proposed, the area will look crowded.
Commissioner Koll questioned that it is a foregone
conclusion that this is the last scenario verses
litigation. She stated that Mendota Heights has the
theme of spaciousness and graciousness and there is no
way that this kind of development with upscale "ticky
tackles" will fit that image. Planner Malloy stated that
the Planning Commission should not burden themselves in
making a decision one way or another with the possibility
of litigation. He stated that the Commission has a
responsibility to the community to see that the best
possible plan, based on the comprehensive plan and City
ordinance, is arrived at.
Planner Malloy explained that the Metropolitan Council
has made recommendations to all of the communities to
"kick in" their fair share of low-cost, affordable
housing. He stated that in looking at this site, this is
one of the better places in Mendota Heights where some
kind of affordable housing can be offered to the
community.
Commissioner Koll stated that she would like to see
townhomes there. She stated that you can get more space
with townhomes than with single family dwellings. Mr.
Boyce stated that the previous plan proposed exactly what
she is looking for. Commissioner Koll stated that the
plan or issue before was dealing with condominiums. She
stated that she would rather see townhomes in lieu of
small lots. Commissioner Tilsen agreed with Commissioner
Koll with respect to the objections on the previous plan
related to condominiums or coachhomes. Chairperson
Morson stated that the developer needs to develop land
that is practical and sensible.
Mr. Boyce compared the previous plan and the compromise
plan as submitted tonight.
Chairperson Morson then opened the meeting to the public.
Mr. Jim Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, stated that he agrees
with Commissioner Koll. He stated that the density in
the Ivy Falls Townhomes is the level of density of a
single family home neighborhood. He questioned if the
hearing notice published is the correct hearing notice
for tonight's meeting. He further commented that he
would like to see larger park lands within the City and
that we do not need more little parks. He stated that he
does not agree with the proposed lot sizes. He stated
that the developer is doing nothing that is required in
the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He further commented that
the Planning Commission is appointed to uphold the City
Ordinances. He stated that the developer has got the
Planning Commission convinced that the starting point of
a development is at the City Ordinances.
Dr. Owens, Copperfield resident, stated that trees will
change over time. He explained that there will be a
regrowth of trees and replanting of trees. He commented
that at the present time, many Oak trees are dying. He
further commented that many lots in the Friendly Hills
area are under 9,000 square feet.
Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican, stated that there are no
lots in the Friendly Hills area that are under 10,000
square feet. Mr. Friel referred to a letter submitted by
previous City Administrator Kevin Frazell, dated December
9, 1987, regarding lot sizes in the Bridgeview Shores
area relating to water area. He stated that the
developer has boot strapped himself into the City
Ordinances by their own economics. He stated that it is
housing. He stated that in looking at this site, this is
one of the better places in Mendota Heights where some
kind of affordable housing can be offered to the
community.
Commissioner Koll stated that she would like to see
townhomes there. She stated that you can get more space
with townhomes than with single family dwellings. Mr.
Boyce stated that the previous plan proposed exactly what
she is looking for. Commissioner Koll stated that the
plan or issue before was dealing with condominiums. She
stated that she would rather see townhomes in lieu of
small lots. Commissioner Tilsen agreed with Commissioner
Koll with respect to the objections on the previous plan
related to condominiums or coachhomes. Chairperson
Morson stated that the developer needs to develop land
that is practical and sensible.
Mr. Boyce compared the previous plan and the compromise
plan as submitted tonight.
Chairperson Morson then opened the meeting to the public.
Mr. Jim Losleben, 815 Hazel Court, stated that he agrees
with Commissioner Koll. He stated that the density in
the Ivy Falls Townhomes is the level of density of a
single family home neighborhood. He questioned if the
hearing notice published is the correct hearing notice
for tonight's meeting. He further commented that he
would like to see larger park lands within the City and
that we do not need more little parks. He stated that he
does not agree with the proposed lot sizes. He stated
that the developer is doing nothing that is required in
the Comprehensive Guide Plan. He further commented that
the Planning Commission is appointed to uphold the City
Ordinances. He stated that the developer has got the
Planning Commission convinced that the starting point of
a development is at the City Ordinances.
Dr. Owens, Copperfield resident, stated that trees will
change over time. He explained that there will be a
regrowth of trees and replanting of trees. He commented
that at the present time, many Oak trees are dying. He
further commented that many lots in the Friendly Hills
area are under 9,000 square feet.
Mr. Bernard Friel, 750 Mohican, stated that there are no
lots in the Friendly Hills area that are under 10,000
square feet. Mr. Friel referred to a letter submitted by
previous City Administrator Kevin Frazell, dated December
9, 1987, regarding lot sizes in the Bridgeview Shores
area relating to water area. He stated that the
developer has boot strapped himself into the City
Ordinances by their own economics. He stated that it is
their own economics that require what he insists you do
for him.
Mr. Tom Smith, Hampshire resident, questioned if the
Planning Commission received a letter from him regarding
power lines. Chairperson Morson confirmed that they did
receive the letter. Mr. Smith further commented about
the park system. He stated that he would like to see a
neighborhood park planned for this area.
Chairperson Morson stated that the parks system, in this
neighborhood, is being reviewed. Parks and Recreation
Chairperson Huber stated that there is a need for active
ballfields. Commissioner Tilsen stated that there is a
need for all types of parks.
Mr. M. Grant, Mary Anderson Homes, commented that the lot
sizes in developments boils down to what the market
needs. He stated that there is no magic lot size.
Mr. Rother, Hampshire resident, stated that he was
displeased with the original plan. He stated that he
attended the meetings held by the developer and he
notices that there are changes made on this new plan as
suggested by the residents. He stated that he finds the
distinction between the single family homes and townhomes
one that he can live with. He stated that he would
rather not see townhomes. He stated that this new plan
does take care of 95 percent of his concerns.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder submitted pictures
taken by City staff regarding the Fairfield Addition in
Eden Prairie, a development similar to what is being
proposed.
Mr. Don Pacdernik, 2472 Hampshire, stated that this plan
has come a long way since the last plan. He stated that
he likes the suggestion of the parks in this plan. He
commented that he would like to see larger lot sizes. In
response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Mr.
Pacdernik stated that the neighborhood meeting seemed to
help steer the developers in the right direction.
Commissioner Duggan moved to table the meeting until City
staff could have proper time in discussing the legality
of the public hearing process for the compromise plan
with the City's attorney.
Motion fails due to the lack of a second.
Commissioner Dreelan moved to continue the public hearing
to January 22, 1991, so that the City staff could
publish the correct hearing notice and that City staff
could get traffic information from Eagan and MnDOT.
their own economics that require what he insists you do
for him.
Mr. Tom Smith, Hampshire resident, questioned if the
Planning Commission received a letter from him regarding
power lines. Chairperson Morson confirmed that they did
receive the letter. Mr. Smith further commented about
the park system. He stated that he would like to see a
neighborhood park planned for this area.
Chairperson Morson stated that the parks system, in this
neighborhood, is being reviewed. Parks and Recreation
Chairperson Huber stated that there is a need for active
ballfields. Commissioner Tilsen stated that there is a
need for all types of parks.
Mr. M. Grant, Mary Anderson Homes, commented that the lot
sizes in developments boils down to what the market
needs. He stated that there is no magic lot size.
Mr. Rother, Hampshire resident, stated that he was
displeased with the original plan. He stated that he
attended the meetings held by the developer and he
notices that there are changes made on this new plan as
suggested by the residents. He stated that he finds the
distinction between the single family homes and townhomes
one that he can live with. He stated that he would
rather not see townhomes. He stated that this new plan
does take care of 95 percent of his concerns.
Administrative Assistant Batchelder submitted pictures
taken by City staff regarding the Fairfield Addition in
Eden Prairie, a development similar to what is being
proposed.
Mr. Don Pacdernik, 2472 Hampshire, stated that this plan
has come a long way since the last plan. He stated that
he likes the suggestion of the parks in this plan. He
commented that he would like to see larger lot sizes. In
response to a question from Commissioner Tilsen, Mr.
Pacdernik stated that the neighborhood meeting seemed to
help steer the developers in the right direction.
Commissioner Duggan moved to table the meeting until City
staff could have proper time in discussing the legality
of the public hearing process for the compromise plan
with the City's attorney.
Motion fails due to the lack of a second.
Commissioner Dreelan moved to continue the public hearing
to January 22, 1991, so that the City staff could
publish the correct hearing notice and that City staff
could get traffic information from Eagan and MnDOT.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 4, KOLL, MORSON, KREBSBACH, TILSEN
Motion fails.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to continue the public hearing
to January 3, 1991 at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 1, DUGGAN
VERBAL REVIEW
ADJOURN
Public Works Director Jim Danielson provided a verbal
review for the planning items at the previous City
Council meeting.
There being no further business, the Planning Commission
adjourned its meeting at 12:15 o'clock P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 4, KOLL, MORSON, KREBSBACH, TILSEN
Motion fails.
Commissioner Dwyer moved to continue the public hearing
to January 3, 1991 at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Dreelan seconded the motion.
AYES: 6
NAYS: 1, DUGGAN
VERBAL REVIEW
ADJOURN
Public Works Director Jim Danielson provided a verbal
review for the planning items at the previous City
Council meeting.
There being no further business, the Planning Commission
adjourned its meeting at 12:15 o'clock P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 3, 1991, SPECIAL MEETING
The special meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was
held on Thursday, January 3, 1991, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairperson Morson called the
special meeting to order at 7:31 o'clock P.M. The following
members were present: Morson, Koll, Dwyer, Krebsbach, Duggan and
Tilsen. Commissioner Dreelan was excused. Also present were
Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin
Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
CONTINUED HEARING:
CASE NO. 90-03:
CENTEX HOMES -
COMPROMISE PLAN
Commissioner Koll questioned if the applicant requested
the Planning Commission to close the public hearing.
Public Works Director Danielson explained that City staff
directed the City Attorney to review the process for the
compromise plan. The City Attorney then directed City
staff to have Centex Homes reapply with their new
request. He explained that the City then directed Centex
Homes to appear on the January 22, 1991 meeting to give
time to publish the correct hearing notice.
Public Works Director Danielson 'then' informed the
Planning Commission that Centex Homes had not pursued the
direction by City staff and has served the City of
Mendota Heights with a Summons.
Commissioner Dwyer briefly reviewed the Summons.
Commissioner Duggan questioned if the City should still
review the requested commercial center as submitted by
Dick Putnam for a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment if his name is listed on the Summons.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that the Commission should set
aside personal feelings and that this Summons should not
have any bearing on other applications submitted.
Public Works Director Danielson briefly reviewed past
Friday News Information relating to Centex Homes and a
letter sent by Administrative Assistant Batchelder and
himself to Centex Homes.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
JANUARY 3, 1991, SPECIAL MEETING
The special meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was
held on Thursday, January 3, 1991, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chairperson Morson called the
special meeting to order at 7:31 o'clock P.M. The following
members were present: Morson, Koll, Dwyer, Krebsbach, Duggan and
Tilsen. Commissioner Dreelan was excused. Also present were
Public Works Director Jim Danielson, Administrative Assistant Kevin
Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
CONTINUED HEARING:
CASE NO. 90-03:
CENTEX HOMES -
COMPROMISE PLAN
Commissioner Koll questioned if the applicant requested
the Planning Commission to close the public hearing.
Public Works Director Danielson explained that City staff
directed the City Attorney to review the process for the
compromise plan. The City Attorney then directed City
staff to have Centex Homes reapply with their new
request. He explained that the City then directed Centex
Homes to appear on the January 22, 1991 meeting to give
time to publish the correct hearing notice.
Public Works Director Danielson 'then' informed the
Planning Commission that Centex Homes had not pursued the
direction by City staff and has served the City of
Mendota Heights with a Summons.
Commissioner Dwyer briefly reviewed the Summons.
Commissioner Duggan questioned if the City should still
review the requested commercial center as submitted by
Dick Putnam for a Minor Comprehensive Guide Plan
Amendment if his name is listed on the Summons.
Commissioner Dwyer stated that the Commission should set
aside personal feelings and that this Summons should not
have any bearing on other applications submitted.
Public Works Director Danielson briefly reviewed past
Friday News Information relating to Centex Homes and a
letter sent by Administrative Assistant Batchelder and
himself to Centex Homes.
Commissioner Koll moved to close the public hearing.
Chairperson Morson seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 2 KREBSBACH, DUGGAN
RETIRING COMMISSIONER
Commissioner Tilsen moved that the City of Mendota
Heights and the Planning Commission is grateful for the
years of dedicated service Chairperson Morson has given
and that he is honored to have served on the Planning
Commission with Chairperson Morson. The rest of the
Planning Commission concurred with Commissioner Tilsen.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
ABSTAIN: MORSON
ADJOURN
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Tilsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:16
o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
Commissioner Koll moved to close the public hearing.
Chairperson Morson seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 2 KREBSBACH, DUGGAN
RETIRING COMMISSIONER
Commissioner Tilsen moved that the City of Mendota
Heights and the Planning Commission is grateful for the
years of dedicated service Chairperson Morson has given
and that he is honored to have served on the Planning
Commission with Chairperson Morson. The rest of the
Planning Commission concurred with Commissioner Tilsen.
Commissioner Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
ABSTAIN: MORSON
ADJOURN
AYES: 6
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Tilsen moved to adjourn the meeting at 8:16
o'clock P.M.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 28, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Budget Effect State Aid Reduction
1
Once again, our State Government is faced with the prospect of
a substantial deficit of some 196 million dollars. To try and
overcome the short fall, the Governor has recommended that 102
million dollars of the deficit be made up through a reduction of
State Aid payments to Cities, only 52 percent of the amount needed.
As a major budget revision, he expects savings of $1,300,000 from
State Departments or an equitable .7 percent of the amount
necessary.
These revisions only apply to the period up to June 30th and
relate to some $44,000 in lost City Revenues. The loss for the
second half of our year can only be speculated at this time. The
good news is that we receive no local government aid and only
$260,000 of HACA Aid. In the past two years, we have lost $426,000
of state aid or about 18 percent of our total tax levy.
The use of City funds seems to be an acknowledged method of
balancing the State Budget with little pain to the Legislature as
the local governments are at the bottom of the tax totem pole and
seem to be able to stick the increases through to the property tax
levy while the State continues to claim no tax increase.
How our representatives can be a party to this line of
thinking is beyond comprehension.
On an annual basis, we feel we can accommodate the reduced aid
level of $44,000 through budget reductions and partial program
spending. These are not a solution to the problem but only a
deferral. For the second half of the year and future years, we can
probably look for equal cuts in aid and will have to begin
searching for major budget reallocations. We would need a City tax
increase of about 4 percent next year to make up the aid reduction
if the reductions for the second half of 1991 are equal to the
first half.
If the State does not allow us to increase our levy limit to
make up the loss, we will probably also have to revisit the
issuance of Equipment Certificates to maintain operations.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 28, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Budget Effect State Aid Reduction
1
Once again, our State Government is faced with the prospect of
a substantial deficit of some 196 million dollars. To try and
overcome the short fall, the Governor has recommended that 102
million dollars of the deficit be made up through a reduction of
State Aid payments to Cities, only 52 percent of the amount needed.
As a major budget revision, he expects savings of $1,300,000 from
State Departments or an equitable .7 percent of the amount
necessary.
These revisions only apply to the period up to June 30th and
relate to some $44,000 in lost City Revenues. The loss for the
second half of our year can only be speculated at this time. The
good news is that we receive no local government aid and only
$260,000 of HACA Aid. In the past two years, we have lost $426,000
of state aid or about 18 percent of our total tax levy.
The use of City funds seems to be an acknowledged method of
balancing the State Budget with little pain to the Legislature as
the local governments are at the bottom of the tax totem pole and
seem to be able to stick the increases through to the property tax
levy while the State continues to claim no tax increase.
How our representatives can be a party to this line of
thinking is beyond comprehension.
On an annual basis, we feel we can accommodate the reduced aid
level of $44,000 through budget reductions and partial program
spending. These are not a solution to the problem but only a
deferral. For the second half of the year and future years, we can
probably look for equal cuts in aid and will have to begin
searching for major budget reallocations. We would need a City tax
increase of about 4 percent next year to make up the aid reduction
if the reductions for the second half of 1991 are equal to the
first half.
If the State does not allow us to increase our levy limit to
make up the loss, we will probably also have to revisit the
issuance of Equipment Certificates to maintain operations.
Resolutions expressing feelings on the aid reductions have
been prepared by the AMM, Mayor's Association and the League of
Minnesota Cities. Attached is a tentative resolution, which
excerpts portions of all three resolutions, which might be
considered if the Council so desires.
ACTION REQUIRED
This memo is for Council's information. If Council so
desires, they should consider adopting Resolution No. 91-_,
"Resolution Opposing further Cuts in State Aid to Cities".
LES:kkb
Resolutions expressing feelings on the aid reductions have
been prepared by the AMM, Mayor's Association and the League of
Minnesota Cities. Attached is a tentative resolution, which
excerpts portions of all three resolutions, which might be
considered if the Council so desires.
ACTION REQUIRED
This memo is for Council's information. If Council so
desires, they should consider adopting Resolution No. 91-_,
"Resolution Opposing further Cuts in State Aid to Cities".
LES:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION OPPOSING FURTHER CUTS IN STATE AID TO CITIES
WHEREAS, State Aid helps fund basic City Services for the City
of Mendota Heights and aid cuts would force large property tax
increases and threaten cuts in these services, and
WHEREAS, many City Services are essential -- police and fire
protection, drug programs, ambulance and emergency services, and
sewer, sanitation and water services -- and affect citizens' health
and safety. The State has an interest and responsibility to help
finance these services, and
WHEREAS, if property taxes increased as a result of aid cuts,
the tax rate disparities between some neighboring Cities and
between Cities and adjoining townships would widen causing great
taxing inequities. The State has a responsibility to ensure a
reasonable level of equity in its tax system, and
WHEREAS, our City has already faced large aid cuts: in 1989,
$85 million in aid was shifted from Cities to school districts; in
1990, City aid was permanently cut by $15.6 million and the $30
million LGA inflation adjustment was eliminated for Pay 1991 and
all future years; for 1992, another $29 million dollars in local
aid cuts are expected to meet the budget reduction target in the
1990 tax bill, and
WHEREAS, previous reductions in State Aid has reduced City
income by $426,000 and resulted in an 18 percent increase in local
taxes; and
WHEREAS, we oppose Governor Carlson's plan to cut Local
Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid
(HACA) by $21 million to help solve the $197 million State budget
shortfall and
WHEREAS, Cities are not the cause of the current budget
crisis, and Cities, like our own, have proven to be frugal
spenders. Per capita City spending in 1989 was virtually unchanged
from its level in 1980, and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights operates under a frugal
and conservative budget, with current operating expenditures of
only 76 percent of the average of metropolitan area communities.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION OPPOSING FURTHER CUTS IN STATE AID TO CITIES
WHEREAS, State Aid helps fund basic City Services for the City
of Mendota Heights and aid cuts would force large property tax
increases and threaten cuts in these services, and
WHEREAS, many City Services are essential -- police and fire
protection, drug programs, ambulance and emergency services, and
sewer, sanitation and water services -- and affect citizens' health
and safety. The State has an interest and responsibility to help
finance these services, and
WHEREAS, if property taxes increased as a result of aid cuts,
the tax rate disparities between some neighboring Cities and
between Cities and adjoining townships would widen causing great
taxing inequities. The State has a responsibility to ensure a
reasonable level of equity in its tax system, and
WHEREAS, our City has already faced large aid cuts: in 1989,
$85 million in aid was shifted from Cities to school districts; in
1990, City aid was permanently cut by $15.6 million and the $30
million LGA inflation adjustment was eliminated for Pay 1991 and
all future years; for 1992, another $29 million dollars in local
aid cuts are expected to meet the budget reduction target in the
1990 tax bill, and
WHEREAS, previous reductions in State Aid has reduced City
income by $426,000 and resulted in an 18 percent increase in local
taxes; and
WHEREAS, we oppose Governor Carlson's plan to cut Local
Government Aid (LGA) and Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid
(HACA) by $21 million to help solve the $197 million State budget
shortfall and
WHEREAS, Cities are not the cause of the current budget
crisis, and Cities, like our own, have proven to be frugal
spenders. Per capita City spending in 1989 was virtually unchanged
from its level in 1980, and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights operates under a frugal
and conservative budget, with current operating expenditures of
only 76 percent of the average of metropolitan area communities.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that State Aid to Cities be
maintained at current levels.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that further cuts in property tax
relief programs or tightening of levy limits for Pay 1991-1993 will
force the City of Mendota Heights to raise property taxes and
seriously affect our ability to provide vital services to our
citizens.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that our members of the Minnesota State
Legislature oppose cuts in State Aid to Cities, tightening of levy
limits, or reductions based on fund balances.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th
day of February, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that State Aid to Cities be
maintained at current levels.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that further cuts in property tax
relief programs or tightening of levy limits for Pay 1991-1993 will
force the City of Mendota Heights to raise property taxes and
seriously affect our ability to provide vital services to our
citizens.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that our members of the Minnesota State
Legislature oppose cuts in State Aid to Cities, tightening of levy
limits, or reductions based on fund balances.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th
day of February, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
February 5, 1991
Asphalt License
Prior Lake Blacktop, Inc.
Masonry Licenses
A & B Cement Construction, Inc.
Moline, B.R.-Masonry, Inc.
Northland Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
Viking Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
Excavating License
Nova -Frost, Inc.
Gas Piping Licenses
Hinding Heating & A/C, Inc.
R.H. Heating & A/C, Inc.
Red Wing Heating & A/C, Inc.
Snell Mechanical, Inc.
Twin City Furnace Co., Inc.
Welter, Ray N. -Heating Co.
General Contractor Licenses
Able Fence, Inc.
Berggren Construction
Bream Builders, Inc.
Coronado Stone
Dahm, K.W. Const. Co., Inc.
Elite Kitchen & Bath, Inc.
KMH Erectors, Inc.
MN Exteriors, Inc.
Nardini Fire Equipment Co.
Roto -Rooter Services Co.
Sela Roofing & Remodeling, Inc.
Shield Fire Protection, Inc.
Unipro Construction Co.
Valley Investments Const. Co.
Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses
Harris Waldinger, Inc.
R.H. Heating & A/C, Inc.
Snell Mechanical, Inc.
Twin City Furnace Co.
Plaster License
Quality Drywall, Inc.
Rubbish License
Roadway Rubbish
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
February 5, 1991
Asphalt License
Prior Lake Blacktop, Inc.
Masonry Licenses
A & B Cement Construction, Inc.
Moline, B.R.-Masonry, Inc.
Northland Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
Viking Concrete & Masonry, Inc.
Excavating License
Nova -Frost, Inc.
Gas Piping Licenses
Hinding Heating & A/C, Inc.
R.H. Heating & A/C, Inc.
Red Wing Heating & A/C, Inc.
Snell Mechanical, Inc.
Twin City Furnace Co., Inc.
Welter, Ray N. -Heating Co.
General Contractor Licenses
Able Fence, Inc.
Berggren Construction
Bream Builders, Inc.
Coronado Stone
Dahm, K.W. Const. Co., Inc.
Elite Kitchen & Bath, Inc.
KMH Erectors, Inc.
MN Exteriors, Inc.
Nardini Fire Equipment Co.
Roto -Rooter Services Co.
Sela Roofing & Remodeling, Inc.
Shield Fire Protection, Inc.
Unipro Construction Co.
Valley Investments Const. Co.
Wenzel Plumbing & Heating, Inc.
Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses
Harris Waldinger, Inc.
R.H. Heating & A/C, Inc.
Snell Mechanical, Inc.
Twin City Furnace Co.
Plaster License
Quality Drywall, Inc.
Rubbish License
Roadway Rubbish
February 5, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
• CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY:
Total Claims
Significant Clflims
MWCC
Unusual Claims
AMM
Apple Computer
Barton Aschmann
Barr Engr
Davies Water
Peat Marwick
Feb sewer
Annual dues
Police Dept
Bark design
Storm Water Study
Hydrant donversion
Audit
108,767
36,049
2,103
5,732
8,765
2,478
2,211
2,500
February 5, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
• CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY:
Total Claims
Significant Clflims
MWCC
Unusual Claims
AMM
Apple Computer
Barton Aschmann
Barr Engr
Davies Water
Peat Marwick
Feb sewer
Annual dues
Police Dept
Bark design
Storm Water Study
Hydrant donversion
Audit
108,767
36,049
2,103
5,732
8,765
2,478
2,211
2,500
• 3 FBb 2 a'J3
Deet 10 -Adm
Dept Du-rtaebriayC
41,,.... ---
Fri, 2:2:'64 P4 City or Mer3data Heights 20 -Police 70 -Parks
` 30 -Fire 80 -Planning
Temp Check Number 3 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling
- 90 -Animal Control
1
2
3
1
Temp.
2
Check
• -Vendor -?Jame Account 4
umber^ -Code --- --Comments raaY
4 crrs5
6
6 2 A M M 01••-44414-130-10 1932 dues 0,103.00 71
8.
_
2 2?, 103.00 ic
Totals Temp Cneck Number 2 11
12
X01 Temp Check Number ._ 7(.
II12 : 15
1 . T 01-4'01.0--110-a0 15.
-ii ---_- ^ 143 call -s 35
13
2 A T 4 T 1212--4elo-ekeut--eo ld calls 10.99
1174
15 c: P 3 t. T 0J -401Z-030-30 Id calls 3.se
2 Ti T 4-T 01
17
75
19
20
4810-0,0-Z0l-d •-r.=al l,s 1-89 -
16
17
et 18.3Z
18 T,. a2.s '.emp-Check-Number
21
22
3
24
16
79
20 Temp Check Number 3 •
21
25
27
18
22 3 A7$7 e2-4;"_30-ec�c`>z''1-' 3
23 Feb SYL' 121..�Lh
3 AT&T 01-4010-070-70 Feb svc 22.03.
24
3 AT -4,7 0,1 SQA -pfd >='£b -`
30
30
31
32
-1rr- _s�•c lY•
25
< 3 ATKT 1 `r -4c^^10 -o60 -S0 _ Feb svc - 20.Z3
26
3 AT:F i 13-42121-060-6e, • Feb svc 11-46
27
•-- - -_----
33
34
35
36
28
3Z 53. 83
29
3o Totals Temp Check Number 3
37
38
39
40
31 Temp Check Number 4
32
33 —4e r Coral-tturarg- 7.saar_-Ixc 03 333.''3• --30
4,
42 ,
43
rprs 1'-0 00 - -
34 _ ------
__ _
35
35 4 lie. eel
36 Tdt•�l s Temp f'hF't umber 4
44
45
47
48
37 .. - -
.a 4 .. .
36 Temp Check Number "• - -
49
50)
51
40
a1 Z A 1 Hydra u 3 3 c Sales 01-4330-4-90-Z0 rprs 303 150. Se.
•,ifh i-,Yh
53
54;
56
43 -.
Totals Temp Check Number 's.. <
44 < ' ..
45
TCmp 'C97CCX NCtmber x
57
581
60
46
47
8 American National fla21k 24-42,^6-1 eta -72x0 78 bd Pee 20.0048
_
- -----
61
62
63'
64
49
50 Totals, , �. 52:. 2>81 •.. � _ s
Temp zneck Number 8
61 _ .. '` .. .. ..i'.
66>
67
68
5z Temp Crreck Number 7 •69
53
64 7 arm.. vomputFar. Fr, Al.=4F+PA-AIA.-•ay} COM(7 eq g,—j.7
70•
71
72
55 < _
56 .. _ ., " x---.-_�_ '<
�7 S, 731-6'7
73
74
75
5
0
r•�
0
T)
3
0
C)
)
)
• 3 FBb 2 a'J3
Deet 10 -Adm
Dept Du-rtaebriayC
41,,.... ---
Fri, 2:2:'64 P4 City or Mer3data Heights 20 -Police 70 -Parks
` 30 -Fire 80 -Planning
Temp Check Number 3 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling
- 90 -Animal Control
1
2
3
1
Temp.
2
Check
• -Vendor -?Jame Account 4
umber^ -Code --- --Comments raaY
4 crrs5
6
6 2 A M M 01••-44414-130-10 1932 dues 0,103.00 71
8.
_
2 2?, 103.00 ic
Totals Temp Cneck Number 2 11
12
X01 Temp Check Number ._ 7(.
II12 : 15
1 . T 01-4'01.0--110-a0 15.
-ii ---_- ^ 143 call -s 35
13
2 A T 4 T 1212--4elo-ekeut--eo ld calls 10.99
1174
15 c: P 3 t. T 0J -401Z-030-30 Id calls 3.se
2 Ti T 4-T 01
17
75
19
20
4810-0,0-Z0l-d •-r.=al l,s 1-89 -
16
17
et 18.3Z
18 T,. a2.s '.emp-Check-Number
21
22
3
24
16
79
20 Temp Check Number 3 •
21
25
27
18
22 3 A7$7 e2-4;"_30-ec�c`>z''1-' 3
23 Feb SYL' 121..�Lh
3 AT&T 01-4010-070-70 Feb svc 22.03.
24
3 AT -4,7 0,1 SQA -pfd >='£b -`
30
30
31
32
-1rr- _s�•c lY•
25
< 3 ATKT 1 `r -4c^^10 -o60 -S0 _ Feb svc - 20.Z3
26
3 AT:F i 13-42121-060-6e, • Feb svc 11-46
27
•-- - -_----
33
34
35
36
28
3Z 53. 83
29
3o Totals Temp Check Number 3
37
38
39
40
31 Temp Check Number 4
32
33 —4e r Coral-tturarg- 7.saar_-Ixc 03 333.''3• --30
4,
42 ,
43
rprs 1'-0 00 - -
34 _ ------
__ _
35
35 4 lie. eel
36 Tdt•�l s Temp f'hF't umber 4
44
45
47
48
37 .. - -
.a 4 .. .
36 Temp Check Number "• - -
49
50)
51
40
a1 Z A 1 Hydra u 3 3 c Sales 01-4330-4-90-Z0 rprs 303 150. Se.
•,ifh i-,Yh
53
54;
56
43 -.
Totals Temp Check Number 's.. <
44 < ' ..
45
TCmp 'C97CCX NCtmber x
57
581
60
46
47
8 American National fla21k 24-42,^6-1 eta -72x0 78 bd Pee 20.0048
_
- -----
61
62
63'
64
49
50 Totals, , �. 52:. 2>81 •.. � _ s
Temp zneck Number 8
61 _ .. '` .. .. ..i'.
66>
67
68
5z Temp Crreck Number 7 •69
53
64 7 arm.. vomputFar. Fr, Al.=4F+PA-AIA.-•ay} COM(7 eq g,—j.7
70•
71
72
55 < _
56 .. _ ., " x---.-_�_ '<
�7 S, 731-6'7
73
74
75
5
0
r•�
0
T)
3
0
C)
)
)
•
3 Peb 1992
Pr1.20:54 AM
Temp Check Number.
7
Claims LIst
C1ty of Mendota Heights
Pane 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
Temp.
Check pc
Number -Vendor -Name Account .4
-Code Comments Amount-- t,
Ii,
Totals TempCheck Number 7 k
a
-;;-,
Temp Check Number 8 12
11
'Jo
11
12
- -_____
:14
Totals C
n
14
n
-Temp -Check -Number- -9-
. lc
Temp Check Number 19'
—
16
17
S 9 A. 5 Auto Supp3y4 15-4330-490-60 splys ns.32
..T Auto Supply" 0/-4330-490-50 splys eo.lbs
9-9-6-J-AutoSupply4
--.1
:21
22
23
24
118
19
n
2 1
—101=4330=440=8Z --splys 2-2-.-8M
9 9 6 3 Auto Supply. 01-4330-448-40 splys 22.en
9 9 6 3 Auto Supply4 01-4330-490-50 spiys 07.38
01-=4330490-50 -.8.-00
J
25
7. 6
27
25
2
•
M
24
25
26
27
PI
9 9 6 J Auto Suppfy4 01-4330-4SO-50 splys 47.ne
Auto Supply, 01-4330-440-20 splys 4.ee
3-9 Z 3 nuto-Supply4
M
30
31
32
01=4330=490-50 PI 08-81--
• . 9 0 a. 3 Auto Supply" 01-4480-050-50 .splys . _ - ' 24.e3 _
'
- -
„ .
-- ,
. . -
' . .
,
n
34
29
30
---Tmp-heek-Number
Totals Temp Check Number s
n
W
45
312-0
32
, .
,
10 9arr Englneering Co - ae-4ees-7se-se Re local wtr res 0,478.00
, '
41
4*
431
44
34
n
36
3121 e, 478.
Totals Temp Check Number 10
45
45,
47
49
37
38
n
,
. ,
Temp Check Number 7° ' ,
. , ° . :
. . , -
. .•
11 Dills Oens-Shop lal--41ge,each-ea ...
49
50,
51'
52
41
42
-------T-o-t-a-s-s--r-en79
12 . e
a:29c* Nusabigr.-----3_1
53
54
55
56
43
44°
45
,
, „ ' ' '`. , .4, g „ , . - .
-
, ' . •°...,'. '
Temp Check 'lumber .. 2152.: ...p ,
,
. • ,, ,,, ,„;
57
56,
59'
6
01,
46
47
46
28 Banyon Data Systems 25-4800-235-80 trng 3'90.0062
- -
5'
61
63
64
49
51
-
Totals Temp Check Number . . '
.
.'- e , , . e . . ,,- • ... — ,
. , ,
...... -- . —, , -
66
67
W
52
53
54
.
23 Ikarton Aschman os-4eee-eze-00 Re Mendakota Park e,765.ee
69
n
71
72
55
9 6
.F
, - _ , .
" 13 3,76Z. ea - -
, . .
- . ,
. . . .. , .,
Totals Temp Check Number 23 . , . ., . ,
, ' ,
.- • , .
73
74
75
79
)
•
3 Peb 1992
Pr1.20:54 AM
Temp Check Number.
7
Claims LIst
C1ty of Mendota Heights
Pane 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
Temp.
Check pc
Number -Vendor -Name Account .4
-Code Comments Amount-- t,
Ii,
Totals TempCheck Number 7 k
a
-;;-,
Temp Check Number 8 12
11
'Jo
11
12
- -_____
:14
Totals C
n
14
n
-Temp -Check -Number- -9-
. lc
Temp Check Number 19'
—
16
17
S 9 A. 5 Auto Supp3y4 15-4330-490-60 splys ns.32
..T Auto Supply" 0/-4330-490-50 splys eo.lbs
9-9-6-J-AutoSupply4
--.1
:21
22
23
24
118
19
n
2 1
—101=4330=440=8Z --splys 2-2-.-8M
9 9 6 3 Auto Supply. 01-4330-448-40 splys 22.en
9 9 6 3 Auto Supply4 01-4330-490-50 spiys 07.38
01-=4330490-50 -.8.-00
J
25
7. 6
27
25
2
•
M
24
25
26
27
PI
9 9 6 J Auto Suppfy4 01-4330-4SO-50 splys 47.ne
Auto Supply, 01-4330-440-20 splys 4.ee
3-9 Z 3 nuto-Supply4
M
30
31
32
01=4330=490-50 PI 08-81--
• . 9 0 a. 3 Auto Supply" 01-4480-050-50 .splys . _ - ' 24.e3 _
'
- -
„ .
-- ,
. . -
' . .
,
n
34
29
30
---Tmp-heek-Number
Totals Temp Check Number s
n
W
45
312-0
32
, .
,
10 9arr Englneering Co - ae-4ees-7se-se Re local wtr res 0,478.00
, '
41
4*
431
44
34
n
36
3121 e, 478.
Totals Temp Check Number 10
45
45,
47
49
37
38
n
,
. ,
Temp Check Number 7° ' ,
. , ° . :
. . , -
. .•
11 Dills Oens-Shop lal--41ge,each-ea ...
49
50,
51'
52
41
42
-------T-o-t-a-s-s--r-en79
12 . e
a:29c* Nusabigr.-----3_1
53
54
55
56
43
44°
45
,
, „ ' ' '`. , .4, g „ , . - .
-
, ' . •°...,'. '
Temp Check 'lumber .. 2152.: ...p ,
,
. • ,, ,,, ,„;
57
56,
59'
6
01,
46
47
46
28 Banyon Data Systems 25-4800-235-80 trng 3'90.0062
- -
5'
61
63
64
49
51
-
Totals Temp Check Number . . '
.
.'- e , , . e . . ,,- • ... — ,
. , ,
...... -- . —, , -
66
67
W
52
53
54
.
23 Ikarton Aschman os-4eee-eze-00 Re Mendakota Park e,765.ee
69
n
71
72
55
9 6
.F
, - _ , .
" 13 3,76Z. ea - -
, . .
- . ,
. . . .. , .,
Totals Temp Check Number 23 . , . ., . ,
, ' ,
.- • , .
73
74
75
79
)
1 Feb 1991 13.1aams 1_3.B0 ,-=.4.- ..,
FrI.19:54 PM City or Mendota Heiyhts
Temp Check Number 14
23
Temp.
Check 13
Amount 14
4
-Vedar Name Account -Code -Comments -
. t. ern
14 Battery 6 Tire Warehouse 01-4330-440-e0 Filter 43.51
50
5
6 ,
7'
:
7
14-Battery-4-Tlre-Warehouse------01,4330,490,M0 parts _13
14 Battery 6 Tire Warehouse 2M-4330-498-60 parts LS 268.7e .
24 Battery & Tire Warehouse 15-4330-490-60 parts ls 33.38
------
1:1zt
_______-
10v.,
I
12
M6 307 -an .14
Totals Temp Check Number 14
1G
.. _.------___ __-_ -----_-_------ ---- _ -- ---- --.--.---_-
13
14
1520
Temp Check Number 1M
.
le
10
1621
17
•*-c.and-of-Wa t ers—Commi ssaoners- . ea --4430 „Yan.svc -7
1V., Board or Water Commissioners 01-44CM-33M-30 Jan svc 58.97
1,oard of Water Commissioners 0:5-441-00e-ee - Jan svc 13.33
4.-45
22
2319
24
19n
20
1.-5--B04.11^-0--o-r-Wa tem -COMMA S.S-t oners, -01=4.4SM-310-70 . -Jan-svc-
.
-- -----
50 98.88
n
27
25_
------5-6.r.-a1.5.-TOMp-C710L7h-NUM17W1.
22
22
24
1n 29
30
Temp Check Humber 16 31
32
2
2
18 Case Power 0, Eq , 28-4330-430-60 parts 40e '34
'
- W
1.1211-81.
2
2
30
27
Totals Temp Checkr Numbe15 . n
39
40
17
ii
Temp Check Number
. , . .
,
17 C 0,. 6 Off:Ice Products 01-4300-310-1e , splys e0.18 . . 43
- --44
34
3
3
45
45
Totals Temp Check Number 17 47
' 48
37
-
' 45
Temp Check Number . 15 " . ' , ;" ' ' , • ' ' ' . - , • .• . ,50
City mmi-r.r 4.. - rentAl t , • 'F.,7 IAA
4
41
42
15 53
20 CIty Motor Supply . 01 -43011 -0110 -*0 splys . 81.84 -. 54
10 Cavy Motor Supply 0M -430M -10n -3M splys 30.75 55
18 city tff,tne. ..lupp,), R7 77n7e 56
26 City Motor Supply i' 01-4330-440-00 , • -' t splys 08.64' ' '• • ' ,,`,'• s, ' ,.:;''
.,, ., .
18 CI ry• Motor Supply . ' 01 -4338-4,0-1,0 ^ - • , , splys' ,. 38:37 .59
. ''', . , ,
- '04 -4A -44M-40
4
-=43 -
61
10 ty Motor Supply 01 -4305 -W50 -M0 spivs 4M.00 62
15 Clty Motor Supply 01-4338-490-M0 spivs 1839.180 • 63
SO,
51
6645
- , , ,- • s4 ',':: . t,'''' , ,
Totals Temp Check Number--, 18 , , , 67
' , , ., .' .7; , -, '' - '' 68
62
53
54
, 68
Temp Check Number 19 . • 70
71
72
19 Clry 'qt. int=10.30-Nab 1W+
55
or -Paul
• - • 73
n . .
,57
..-- ,
,
, . 74
, ,' , 75
419 , , • ' Z. ....ev, • •
.,.. . , , ,, , • . - , , ,
.— • - , 79
:•
0
0
0
0
0
1 Feb 1991 13.1aams 1_3.B0 ,-=.4.- ..,
FrI.19:54 PM City or Mendota Heiyhts
Temp Check Number 14
23
Temp.
Check 13
Amount 14
4
-Vedar Name Account -Code -Comments -
. t. ern
14 Battery 6 Tire Warehouse 01-4330-440-e0 Filter 43.51
50
5
6 ,
7'
:
7
14-Battery-4-Tlre-Warehouse------01,4330,490,M0 parts _13
14 Battery 6 Tire Warehouse 2M-4330-498-60 parts LS 268.7e .
24 Battery & Tire Warehouse 15-4330-490-60 parts ls 33.38
------
1:1zt
_______-
10v.,
I
12
M6 307 -an .14
Totals Temp Check Number 14
1G
.. _.------___ __-_ -----_-_------ ---- _ -- ---- --.--.---_-
13
14
1520
Temp Check Number 1M
.
le
10
1621
17
•*-c.and-of-Wa t ers—Commi ssaoners- . ea --4430 „Yan.svc -7
1V., Board or Water Commissioners 01-44CM-33M-30 Jan svc 58.97
1,oard of Water Commissioners 0:5-441-00e-ee - Jan svc 13.33
4.-45
22
2319
24
19n
20
1.-5--B04.11^-0--o-r-Wa tem -COMMA S.S-t oners, -01=4.4SM-310-70 . -Jan-svc-
.
-- -----
50 98.88
n
27
25_
------5-6.r.-a1.5.-TOMp-C710L7h-NUM17W1.
22
22
24
1n 29
30
Temp Check Humber 16 31
32
2
2
18 Case Power 0, Eq , 28-4330-430-60 parts 40e '34
'
- W
1.1211-81.
2
2
30
27
Totals Temp Checkr Numbe15 . n
39
40
17
ii
Temp Check Number
. , . .
,
17 C 0,. 6 Off:Ice Products 01-4300-310-1e , splys e0.18 . . 43
- --44
34
3
3
45
45
Totals Temp Check Number 17 47
' 48
37
-
' 45
Temp Check Number . 15 " . ' , ;" ' ' , • ' ' ' . - , • .• . ,50
City mmi-r.r 4.. - rentAl t , • 'F.,7 IAA
4
41
42
15 53
20 CIty Motor Supply . 01 -43011 -0110 -*0 splys . 81.84 -. 54
10 Cavy Motor Supply 0M -430M -10n -3M splys 30.75 55
18 city tff,tne. ..lupp,), R7 77n7e 56
26 City Motor Supply i' 01-4330-440-00 , • -' t splys 08.64' ' '• • ' ,,`,'• s, ' ,.:;''
.,, ., .
18 CI ry• Motor Supply . ' 01 -4338-4,0-1,0 ^ - • , , splys' ,. 38:37 .59
. ''', . , ,
- '04 -4A -44M-40
4
-=43 -
61
10 ty Motor Supply 01 -4305 -W50 -M0 spivs 4M.00 62
15 Clty Motor Supply 01-4338-490-M0 spivs 1839.180 • 63
SO,
51
6645
- , , ,- • s4 ',':: . t,'''' , ,
Totals Temp Check Number--, 18 , , , 67
' , , ., .' .7; , -, '' - '' 68
62
53
54
, 68
Temp Check Number 19 . • 70
71
72
19 Clry 'qt. int=10.30-Nab 1W+
55
or -Paul
• - • 73
n . .
,57
..-- ,
,
, . 74
, ,' , 75
419 , , • ' Z. ....ev, • •
.,.. . , , ,, , • . - , , ,
.— • - , 79
:•
0
0
0
0
0
1
2 Feb 1991
Pr -J.20:7'14 P'
Temp Check Number
Claims List
City or Mendota Heights
Page 4
2
3
5
6
t9l
Temp. ; .
Check
Nymber-Vendor-Name Account
-Code Comments Amount i -`d
4
i6'
£'rL+ City of Burnsville 02-4400-110-10 1801 br4rst 1n.L5 17`
e415 C-1-t-y-of--le-i-e--1-i
9
--01-L'
-440-09,
109 1-egl brkOstt �:.,
Z c ,
-- 5.
40 30.47 11
17
10
11
12
T" obal-s Temp -Check Humber -------Z0
Temp Check Number ;.1
14
15
01 Collins £I ectrl cal Const 01-4021-400-Z0 rprs MH1 d L tin = J. 14 -^
-- 15
L1
16
17
18
5
20
21
sti.1e
12t
ToT•al s Temp £h P.Ck Humber el 122
,`^
— -....o_.--NLIMbe-....o_.!z4
� z5
} '2r
yL
' Comm Center 41 -4644 -brei-,^ eq 700.00 !27
)47-eM el !28
22
23
24
r 4'40*.—'+70,-.7.0 cq 990 Ae
le' Comm Center 41-4330-460-30 rprs 146.37
--—._-•----
_
Gb
9
36
31
32
25
26
27
.T-J4e s3
Totals Temp Check Humber 22
Tcmp Check Number :_`2 -
33
34
35
30
28
29
30
e3 Connect Inc 01-4000-810-3054ertdhtsmr,Td conn chg n.7-5
37
38
39
40
31
33
;.3"`3.5
7
Totals Temp Check Humber ,e3 .-
41
43
44
34
35
36
Temp Check Number ;i4
'-'1 Copy -a- • 'Q
45
46,
47
48
37
39
13L)pl 1-e a j --Tei d-Liet,6-0.1=4ZeZ=lit'•S'i3- - .a
"x^..
04 1'2. 41 _
Tata13 Tcmp £lht k HumbLr 04 •
49
51
52
40
az
Temp Check Number E8
53
54.
55'
55
43>
44
45
laZ COrc`Or^art."HOWe� .01-4330-4-90-10 splys w•;.< . q , 1:.,e5
' ,,. -
�. _
57
Sa
46
47
48
Totals Temp Check Number en •62
Tamp Check Number ere—
61
63,
64
49
50
51
.. ...
es Corrlgarr, Electric 02-4338-31:3-312 ' rprs 244.05
es Corr1 D`7 E1Rri=He,- V,1-...e.e1 -
3 1-f+i�4S»r .^�t^v.- a'� 'A{
65
66
67
68
52
5370
54
--
Y,
303.64
TQY,i1 c ) Cmfs-C 3aCii_$4umb®r, •''
69
71
72
56
56
.k7Temp
-,
. - ..
. a
Check. Number 07
73
74.
75
.9
7
1
2 Feb 1991
Pr -J.20:7'14 P'
Temp Check Number
Claims List
City or Mendota Heights
Page 4
2
3
5
6
t9l
Temp. ; .
Check
Nymber-Vendor-Name Account
-Code Comments Amount i -`d
4
i6'
£'rL+ City of Burnsville 02-4400-110-10 1801 br4rst 1n.L5 17`
e415 C-1-t-y-of--le-i-e--1-i
9
--01-L'
-440-09,
109 1-egl brkOstt �:.,
Z c ,
-- 5.
40 30.47 11
17
10
11
12
T" obal-s Temp -Check Humber -------Z0
Temp Check Number ;.1
14
15
01 Collins £I ectrl cal Const 01-4021-400-Z0 rprs MH1 d L tin = J. 14 -^
-- 15
L1
16
17
18
5
20
21
sti.1e
12t
ToT•al s Temp £h P.Ck Humber el 122
,`^
— -....o_.--NLIMbe-....o_.!z4
� z5
} '2r
yL
' Comm Center 41 -4644 -brei-,^ eq 700.00 !27
)47-eM el !28
22
23
24
r 4'40*.—'+70,-.7.0 cq 990 Ae
le' Comm Center 41-4330-460-30 rprs 146.37
--—._-•----
_
Gb
9
36
31
32
25
26
27
.T-J4e s3
Totals Temp Check Humber 22
Tcmp Check Number :_`2 -
33
34
35
30
28
29
30
e3 Connect Inc 01-4000-810-3054ertdhtsmr,Td conn chg n.7-5
37
38
39
40
31
33
;.3"`3.5
7
Totals Temp Check Humber ,e3 .-
41
43
44
34
35
36
Temp Check Number ;i4
'-'1 Copy -a- • 'Q
45
46,
47
48
37
39
13L)pl 1-e a j --Tei d-Liet,6-0.1=4ZeZ=lit'•S'i3- - .a
"x^..
04 1'2. 41 _
Tata13 Tcmp £lht k HumbLr 04 •
49
51
52
40
az
Temp Check Number E8
53
54.
55'
55
43>
44
45
laZ COrc`Or^art."HOWe� .01-4330-4-90-10 splys w•;.< . q , 1:.,e5
' ,,. -
�. _
57
Sa
46
47
48
Totals Temp Check Number en •62
Tamp Check Number ere—
61
63,
64
49
50
51
.. ...
es Corrlgarr, Electric 02-4338-31:3-312 ' rprs 244.05
es Corr1 D`7 E1Rri=He,- V,1-...e.e1 -
3 1-f+i�4S»r .^�t^v.- a'� 'A{
65
66
67
68
52
5370
54
--
Y,
303.64
TQY,i1 c ) Cmfs-C 3aCii_$4umb®r, •''
69
71
72
56
56
.k7Temp
-,
. - ..
. a
Check. Number 07
73
74.
75
.9
7
Pri.10:n4 PM City or Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 07
1
2
3
11
Temp.
2
Check s
Name Account Amol,n4- 4
4
.
5
6
Haw r—Vendot -Code --Comments
6
07 County Recorder 01-33611i riling ree 00.00 7
8 I
7
8
9
9
07 evt.z•21
iC.
Totals Temp Check Number 07 II
12
10 13
Temp Check Number ea
11 74
lb
-Dnow
ai.greri Shari:fl...bban._______-_01.--.01.63t2
0
13 17
-- -------- 'lc
u
•7,..q
1,4e65. -0e. 19
111r: 20
t.al-e-Temp Check -Number
.ea
10 21
17 - 22
Ternp Check Number as 23
18
19
09 Dakota County re pfssy, oa-4404-o3o-zo 1&:31 dues 316.00
20 "
— ----
21 -,-
'71E4-00
25
26
27
28
22
Totals Temp Check Humber 20
23
T mb 1,,-k Number --30
29
30
31
32
,
26 , •
30 Dakota County Auditor 01-44120-1121 svcs ', _117.00 ', •-•• ,
27
hakot4 Co",,ty oubl-tor , eim.,4.4ea...1.==a=,,,,-. ' 117
33
34
35
36-i
..'3
28
--
29
60 e34.0
30
Total T..mp--Check--Mumbr.,-
37
38
39
40
_____30
31 . ' . .
" .
32
Temp Chock Number 31 ' *: ,
33 < , .
'
41
42
43
44
34 •
31 Dakota County 01-4011-406-Z0 city share costs 5.34-11
35
— ---
36.
-41 .5g4 il
45
46
47
48
n
Totala Temp -Check Number , " 31
38 , . • . . _ ,, ' ,4 '
,
Temp.rtipocp wuro-tr. ';-. ,
W
52
40
4154
30 Sameanielson 16* -4415-10Z-16 Feb allow '' . a 0:0. 0055
42
—
53
56
- 3e • : ae0.00' ,'.'-' .• '
Totals Temp Check Number - - 32 . ‘ . ,., ',59
45 ,
60
4
Temp Check Number 33 . . -
47
48
'----.33-43-42424-ambrol-r in --3,40, ,
61
62 ,
63 '
64
49 . . „
,
' .
50 . ,• , '*' • . ., . , , , .
33 _ , ,:' , ,
.
1 , , ',.. ' .
7 ..:011.60 . . .
51 , . , . ,
^t,pis mmr. .rhm,k 4..1", ' ' -4,1,
65
i
6676
52
53
Temp Check Number 34
54
69
70
71
72
55
34 Dennis DelmOnt . • ea-441z-eee—tia • , ,. FEb . , • ' 100.00 - .-
, .. '-
' 34 ' ..
,
.1 tv•17, 17.44 , .„ •
71
7
7 '
79
•
•
0
0
0
Pri.10:n4 PM City or Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 07
1
2
3
11
Temp.
2
Check s
Name Account Amol,n4- 4
4
.
5
6
Haw r—Vendot -Code --Comments
6
07 County Recorder 01-33611i riling ree 00.00 7
8 I
7
8
9
9
07 evt.z•21
iC.
Totals Temp Check Number 07 II
12
10 13
Temp Check Number ea
11 74
lb
-Dnow
ai.greri Shari:fl...bban._______-_01.--.01.63t2
0
13 17
-- -------- 'lc
u
•7,..q
1,4e65. -0e. 19
111r: 20
t.al-e-Temp Check -Number
.ea
10 21
17 - 22
Ternp Check Number as 23
18
19
09 Dakota County re pfssy, oa-4404-o3o-zo 1&:31 dues 316.00
20 "
— ----
21 -,-
'71E4-00
25
26
27
28
22
Totals Temp Check Humber 20
23
T mb 1,,-k Number --30
29
30
31
32
,
26 , •
30 Dakota County Auditor 01-44120-1121 svcs ', _117.00 ', •-•• ,
27
hakot4 Co",,ty oubl-tor , eim.,4.4ea...1.==a=,,,,-. ' 117
33
34
35
36-i
..'3
28
--
29
60 e34.0
30
Total T..mp--Check--Mumbr.,-
37
38
39
40
_____30
31 . ' . .
" .
32
Temp Chock Number 31 ' *: ,
33 < , .
'
41
42
43
44
34 •
31 Dakota County 01-4011-406-Z0 city share costs 5.34-11
35
— ---
36.
-41 .5g4 il
45
46
47
48
n
Totala Temp -Check Number , " 31
38 , . • . . _ ,, ' ,4 '
,
Temp.rtipocp wuro-tr. ';-. ,
W
52
40
4154
30 Sameanielson 16* -4415-10Z-16 Feb allow '' . a 0:0. 0055
42
—
53
56
- 3e • : ae0.00' ,'.'-' .• '
Totals Temp Check Number - - 32 . ‘ . ,., ',59
45 ,
60
4
Temp Check Number 33 . . -
47
48
'----.33-43-42424-ambrol-r in --3,40, ,
61
62 ,
63 '
64
49 . . „
,
' .
50 . ,• , '*' • . ., . , , , .
33 _ , ,:' , ,
.
1 , , ',.. ' .
7 ..:011.60 . . .
51 , . , . ,
^t,pis mmr. .rhm,k 4..1", ' ' -4,1,
65
i
6676
52
53
Temp Check Number 34
54
69
70
71
72
55
34 Dennis DelmOnt . • ea-441z-eee—tia • , ,. FEb . , • ' 100.00 - .-
, .. '-
' 34 ' ..
,
.1 tv•17, 17.44 , .„ •
71
7
7 '
79
•
•
0
0
0
1 Feb 2991 v.:lairds Lisp r,age c.
Fr1.10:154 PM City (.f Mendota Heinhts
•
Temp Check Number 34
2 Temp. -11
I.:
Check
3 I 4 I
Amount
.umber -Vendor -Name Account -Code Comments
4 SI
5 161
Totals Temp Check Number 34 17
6 ,E
7 ,t il
Temp Check Number
11
rS-BaAeles-Waver-Eq------------ --37-4460-600-e0----- -----------A-e-F-M-hydr-conv------------ .1,, 021.17
____ -------- 1.
II
12 • !-
Totals-Temp-theck-humber• • -= -
13
14 ' • 1E
Temp Check Number 38 1E,
15 ,20!
16 11
36 lstone Cabinetry Inc 0i -4831 -oz -421-o0 Pe Barlock Feb 78.00 2;
V
-- ----- n
is v.
-8.00
38
19 25
,Totals Temp crleck Number . 36 20
20
, 27
3 28
aneCk-N1491132?m
22 29
23 30
37 Fisher Photo Supply 01-43015-ese-o0 ' splys 209.48 31
24 32
-- --
25 33
37 , • 109.48 . 34
26 . . 4
Totals Temp cneck Number 37. 35
27 , 36
28 37
28 Temp Check Number 38 38
39
30
01-4400 ,a,-1---ou-as 39-'1=0 40
----36-r-÷r49-1hat-st9.a4-1-Asr, o0 -MN Ine-so
31 . 41
• , .
32 — 2
38 , , 3S. 1210 43
33 , .
aa ' 44
TOG:al, Tell7p-anCCV MUMeel
34 40
35 46
Temp Check Number 39 47
36 an
39 First Interstate Bank Trustee' ei-e072- , :'; ,„, . , - ' Feb prem - 38 . •;,, , ., ,, , -195.04 . ' 50 .
prom 87.97 -- ,.
35 First interstate Bank Trustee 01-413e-0sta-eel " ' ' , Pep . -
, . , . • .
a-----39-F-1-rst--Intereta44k Trustee 01--4432...-0:50-90 Fob • ,, .,7 "4 52
prem . 53
40
39 First interstate Bank Trustee 01-413S-070-70 Feb prem e2.88 54
41 --- 55
42 -56
1
Totals Temp Check Number •& • ": • .;.,:., . ..
, 55
- ,
4. -; . - , . . • 89
, •
45 , . . • ', '
. '
C . 60
Number
Tcmp hccfl
46 61
47 62
40 0 A B Business Svc 01-4330-490-70 dmg reimb Re Preiner 014.30 63
48 64
....----
.
, ., , " , • - • 0 65
IAN % • ' , • , " \ , . , ' 14.30
50 6
, „ , 7
Totals Temp Check Number 40 '.
61 • ' , •
' • 68
5 69
Temp Check Number 41
53 • 70
71
44_421_9_44_44:4.tp 40.-00r72
.11-ied..1-1- 73
. .
', , . , 74
56 , . „ . ' . . ' ' , a . , 7'
. ,
7 , ' *., ' , . .
,
' , 19
_-•
1 Feb 2991 v.:lairds Lisp r,age c.
Fr1.10:154 PM City (.f Mendota Heinhts
•
Temp Check Number 34
2 Temp. -11
I.:
Check
3 I 4 I
Amount
.umber -Vendor -Name Account -Code Comments
4 SI
5 161
Totals Temp Check Number 34 17
6 ,E
7 ,t il
Temp Check Number
11
rS-BaAeles-Waver-Eq------------ --37-4460-600-e0----- -----------A-e-F-M-hydr-conv------------ .1,, 021.17
____ -------- 1.
II
12 • !-
Totals-Temp-theck-humber• • -= -
13
14 ' • 1E
Temp Check Number 38 1E,
15 ,20!
16 11
36 lstone Cabinetry Inc 0i -4831 -oz -421-o0 Pe Barlock Feb 78.00 2;
V
-- ----- n
is v.
-8.00
38
19 25
,Totals Temp crleck Number . 36 20
20
, 27
3 28
aneCk-N1491132?m
22 29
23 30
37 Fisher Photo Supply 01-43015-ese-o0 ' splys 209.48 31
24 32
-- --
25 33
37 , • 109.48 . 34
26 . . 4
Totals Temp cneck Number 37. 35
27 , 36
28 37
28 Temp Check Number 38 38
39
30
01-4400 ,a,-1---ou-as 39-'1=0 40
----36-r-÷r49-1hat-st9.a4-1-Asr, o0 -MN Ine-so
31 . 41
• , .
32 — 2
38 , , 3S. 1210 43
33 , .
aa ' 44
TOG:al, Tell7p-anCCV MUMeel
34 40
35 46
Temp Check Number 39 47
36 an
39 First Interstate Bank Trustee' ei-e072- , :'; ,„, . , - ' Feb prem - 38 . •;,, , ., ,, , -195.04 . ' 50 .
prom 87.97 -- ,.
35 First interstate Bank Trustee 01-413e-0sta-eel " ' ' , Pep . -
, . , . • .
a-----39-F-1-rst--Intereta44k Trustee 01--4432...-0:50-90 Fob • ,, .,7 "4 52
prem . 53
40
39 First interstate Bank Trustee 01-413S-070-70 Feb prem e2.88 54
41 --- 55
42 -56
1
Totals Temp Check Number •& • ": • .;.,:., . ..
, 55
- ,
4. -; . - , . . • 89
, •
45 , . . • ', '
. '
C . 60
Number
Tcmp hccfl
46 61
47 62
40 0 A B Business Svc 01-4330-490-70 dmg reimb Re Preiner 014.30 63
48 64
....----
.
, ., , " , • - • 0 65
IAN % • ' , • , " \ , . , ' 14.30
50 6
, „ , 7
Totals Temp Check Number 40 '.
61 • ' , •
' • 68
5 69
Temp Check Number 41
53 • 70
71
44_421_9_44_44:4.tp 40.-00r72
.11-ied..1-1- 73
. .
', , . , 74
56 , . „ . ' . . ' ' , a . , 7'
. ,
7 , ' *., ' , . .
,
' , 19
_-•
1 Jeb 1991
Fr1.1191:4 PM
Temp V-neck Number
41
Claims List
City of Mendota Heights
Paae 7
Temp.
2!
Check 3 I
4 I
PM"
5
67
• • mber-Vendor-Name CsCre LI rst-C od e -Domments mous*
6
41 0 0 i Corp 01-1 0 01 01.1 014.50 71
;I
s
a
.81h
00 174 G]
Totals Temp Check Number ''t3 11
72!
101D
11 Temp Check Number 4C ,14
It
n lc
ox:_,.'-• el-scom 01,4330,480-30
-of-Minn-Inc. pager-rprs -34 £9
3
c 1-4339-450-30 pager rprs 31.50
4 40 Discom or Minn In0
4le Dlscom of Minn Inc Z1-4330-480-30 pager rpr 31.80
5
4;9---Cht-scom-o f
1'2
le
19
20
-Mi nn -I r)C. -01-4330-450,30 pager-nps -35-93
1 6
40 Dlscom of Minn Inc 01-4350-450-30 pager rpr 36.93
17
---
21
22
23
16 ^,
479_5.1
24
9
Totals Temp Check Number 4e ,
,
224---T-emip--r-heck,--Number -43
26
26
2a
1 23
43
24 W W Srainger 01-4308-050-50 parts 035.96
43-14-44-t2Wa ter. 01,4305-070-70
29
n
31
.147 g -part I -S.-73
25
! - - . -- - - - - .•34
26 4
' '
27 • . , 054. 69 -,
° ,
Totals-T-mp-Chack-Mumben-_-_____-.4-4
35
36
28
2 .
Temp Cneck Number 4.# .
30
37
38
39
40
31 .
• 44 Soodwlil Industries Inc 01-0010 • Dec svc, . 110.00
32 ,
-- - ' -- ----
33 .
44 1101....70115
42
43
44
34 45
Totals Temp CnecH Humber 44
35 46
36 47
Temp Cneck r'1',e 4848
50
-, 48 Sreat Western Iron 8- Metal: '01-4305-050-50 ' " ;splys , 51
39 e . .
40 53
45 areat Western iron it- Metal 01-4308-050-50 splys ( 110. 00 :
41 . 54
--- ----- - 55
42 1-.a., i56F172 172.0
43 . ,
, Y • '.: 0 • „ ,: ' 67
Totals, Temp tlhecic Number 45 :- • ;, , - - ' . . l' ' ' '' .4. ' . .
, . ,
. . ,
46 , , 1 y • 5
. - 4:: ' '
T,p 1'174,1- P.I.r.," 46 60
46 61
47621
46 Sun Club Lake WMO 18-4404-000-00 91 budget share 811.91 63
48
-- ------64
, . , , 65
', ' , , .
• , , • , s: ' el 1. 91 . .. ,
. .ir ,
' Totals Temp enecH Number . 45 ,,,. ' . , , ;f:, , ,
e : w . _
' . , , 67
51 - 68
69
Temp Check Number 47
63 7
71
54
4.7-.14441.--titeAL-Sa.2-seks 04-,--4313.,-.z0 6424-3
66 . 73
' •fi 7 . , .. . . , ' . . 06.40,
C TOt.177C raMO enE014 NUMU,93. . . 29
0
0
1 Jeb 1991
Fr1.1191:4 PM
Temp V-neck Number
41
Claims List
City of Mendota Heights
Paae 7
Temp.
2!
Check 3 I
4 I
PM"
5
67
• • mber-Vendor-Name CsCre LI rst-C od e -Domments mous*
6
41 0 0 i Corp 01-1 0 01 01.1 014.50 71
;I
s
a
.81h
00 174 G]
Totals Temp Check Number ''t3 11
72!
101D
11 Temp Check Number 4C ,14
It
n lc
ox:_,.'-• el-scom 01,4330,480-30
-of-Minn-Inc. pager-rprs -34 £9
3
c 1-4339-450-30 pager rprs 31.50
4 40 Discom or Minn In0
4le Dlscom of Minn Inc Z1-4330-480-30 pager rpr 31.80
5
4;9---Cht-scom-o f
1'2
le
19
20
-Mi nn -I r)C. -01-4330-450,30 pager-nps -35-93
1 6
40 Dlscom of Minn Inc 01-4350-450-30 pager rpr 36.93
17
---
21
22
23
16 ^,
479_5.1
24
9
Totals Temp Check Number 4e ,
,
224---T-emip--r-heck,--Number -43
26
26
2a
1 23
43
24 W W Srainger 01-4308-050-50 parts 035.96
43-14-44-t2Wa ter. 01,4305-070-70
29
n
31
.147 g -part I -S.-73
25
! - - . -- - - - - .•34
26 4
' '
27 • . , 054. 69 -,
° ,
Totals-T-mp-Chack-Mumben-_-_____-.4-4
35
36
28
2 .
Temp Cneck Number 4.# .
30
37
38
39
40
31 .
• 44 Soodwlil Industries Inc 01-0010 • Dec svc, . 110.00
32 ,
-- - ' -- ----
33 .
44 1101....70115
42
43
44
34 45
Totals Temp CnecH Humber 44
35 46
36 47
Temp Cneck r'1',e 4848
50
-, 48 Sreat Western Iron 8- Metal: '01-4305-050-50 ' " ;splys , 51
39 e . .
40 53
45 areat Western iron it- Metal 01-4308-050-50 splys ( 110. 00 :
41 . 54
--- ----- - 55
42 1-.a., i56F172 172.0
43 . ,
, Y • '.: 0 • „ ,: ' 67
Totals, Temp tlhecic Number 45 :- • ;, , - - ' . . l' ' ' '' .4. ' . .
, . ,
. . ,
46 , , 1 y • 5
. - 4:: ' '
T,p 1'174,1- P.I.r.," 46 60
46 61
47621
46 Sun Club Lake WMO 18-4404-000-00 91 budget share 811.91 63
48
-- ------64
, . , , 65
', ' , , .
• , , • , s: ' el 1. 91 . .. ,
. .ir ,
' Totals Temp enecH Number . 45 ,,,. ' . , , ;f:, , ,
e : w . _
' . , , 67
51 - 68
69
Temp Check Number 47
63 7
71
54
4.7-.14441.--titeAL-Sa.2-seks 04-,--4313.,-.z0 6424-3
66 . 73
' •fi 7 . , .. . . , ' . . 06.40,
C TOt.177C raMO enE014 NUMU,93. . . 29
0
0
/ 2 k=eb 2991
Fri, 10754 PN
Temp Check Number
48
Claims L2st
City or Mendota Heights
Pane 8
-n
z
Temp. ::11
Check i 3
-rd
4
15
6
rmber-Vendor•-Name Account -Code Crmraer,ts Amount
15
48 Hdwe Hank 01-4309-030-30 spl ys 193.98 17
8-
6
9
Hdwe-Hank 02 43.0.9-030 343 spays.-._.-_w__.-.____°--...--__-_.._---_---8.98�4'
46 Hdwe Hank 03-4309-050-50 spl ys :'2.64 '10'
48 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-050-50 spl ys 9. 86 ,11
0
11
12
!i-Hdwe-Hank 01 431213--,2'+,..�Zr-'1,D-__._-._--------------sp.3ys------.---•----.._.- .-__-_--� _.. 8:97 17,
---
24121 ,
r_4.3_ r 3
Totals---Fernp-Check-number-----------
13
14
15
4`�-------•-----.�-.^.-------•--------------..-.---------_-._.-------•-----------._.--___._.-- ---•--._. -------ii
1L'
Temp Check Number 49 t,;
:d
16
17
18
211
49 Holmes 8 Graves 01-4408-020-00 subs 59.00
19 i a
19
20
21
-00
Totals Temp Check Number 49 26
.27
Temp-43heck-Number 546
22
23
24
''Q1 1 CCS01-44949-109-09 copier mtcr, 19.90
'Ze1 1 0 8 121-,4330-•490•=1171-
,28
_9
30
31
�2
25
26
27
copi-em-mtcn 9 6121—
5$k 1 O S 811 -4.168-088-85 copier mtcn - 2.60
50 f 0 8 01-4330-460-30 copier mtch ; - 17.00
50 1-0-8 04=4330=x}45---40 cups- h ch 1.B., m
33
34
35
16
28
29
30
-m
0 1 0 8 01-4300-o00-88 copier mtcr1 96_ 80
o 1 0 S 03-4330-490-29 copier mtcr, 42.69
c�f0—v±-13� 08 -'►.33v 00-00 cops-.�..tch 4 vv..;
37
39
39
40
31
a3 32
50 1 0 S ' 05-4490-000-00 copier mtcn x..75
80 Y 0 9 , 15-4330--490-60 copies- mtcn 25.91
50-1-0-8 '14 '
a1
42
43
as
34
35
36
01-4300-110 20 ;p2 yS • 9 - .
50 1 0 8 01'-43,20-•12+30-•30 epiys 454.25
--- --
eft.. 3'+5 76
45
a6
47
46
37
38
39
ao
41
42
° .. _
Totals Ternp Check Number ^ ✓„ . z ,. ,. _ .'
mber 92
49
50
51
62
92 1 0 S 01-4300-040-40 spays 94.03
51 3-. -9- &-1 1 6421 - .
53
54
55
56
43
44
45
. 02 1 0 S ` . '01-4300-070-,70,' , .a spl ys , 34. L-`5 " " -
52 1 0 S ;1 09-43007109-15 spl'yz - - 94.23 - •
91 1 0 S. 18=4300-060=60 '14
57
58
59
60
46
47
48
--,----Totals
;a5
�- - _----
' ✓9 271.29
TCM -Cheek- -umber^ a92
61
62
63
64
50
81
Temp Check number, .92 , ': ° . ` '
, •.
67 •.
68
52
53
54
5.2 1 C m n RT 01 -e12172 22/28 pcyro l l 169. 23
942 1 i• k? A R 7 01-4134-•1 10-10 12/88 ‘ pq yr^o1 l 84.44 -
,. -. 1. 2-1-2-3-p l-1 175 7'•
69
70
71
72
55
56
yt^u
- .., • ,
•
73
74
75
01
f 7
0
"J
1)
/ 2 k=eb 2991
Fri, 10754 PN
Temp Check Number
48
Claims L2st
City or Mendota Heights
Pane 8
-n
z
Temp. ::11
Check i 3
-rd
4
15
6
rmber-Vendor•-Name Account -Code Crmraer,ts Amount
15
48 Hdwe Hank 01-4309-030-30 spl ys 193.98 17
8-
6
9
Hdwe-Hank 02 43.0.9-030 343 spays.-._.-_w__.-.____°--...--__-_.._---_---8.98�4'
46 Hdwe Hank 03-4309-050-50 spl ys :'2.64 '10'
48 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-050-50 spl ys 9. 86 ,11
0
11
12
!i-Hdwe-Hank 01 431213--,2'+,..�Zr-'1,D-__._-._--------------sp.3ys------.---•----.._.- .-__-_--� _.. 8:97 17,
---
24121 ,
r_4.3_ r 3
Totals---Fernp-Check-number-----------
13
14
15
4`�-------•-----.�-.^.-------•--------------..-.---------_-._.-------•-----------._.--___._.-- ---•--._. -------ii
1L'
Temp Check Number 49 t,;
:d
16
17
18
211
49 Holmes 8 Graves 01-4408-020-00 subs 59.00
19 i a
19
20
21
-00
Totals Temp Check Number 49 26
.27
Temp-43heck-Number 546
22
23
24
''Q1 1 CCS01-44949-109-09 copier mtcr, 19.90
'Ze1 1 0 8 121-,4330-•490•=1171-
,28
_9
30
31
�2
25
26
27
copi-em-mtcn 9 6121—
5$k 1 O S 811 -4.168-088-85 copier mtcn - 2.60
50 f 0 8 01-4330-460-30 copier mtch ; - 17.00
50 1-0-8 04=4330=x}45---40 cups- h ch 1.B., m
33
34
35
16
28
29
30
-m
0 1 0 8 01-4300-o00-88 copier mtcr1 96_ 80
o 1 0 S 03-4330-490-29 copier mtcr, 42.69
c�f0—v±-13� 08 -'►.33v 00-00 cops-.�..tch 4 vv..;
37
39
39
40
31
a3 32
50 1 0 S ' 05-4490-000-00 copier mtcn x..75
80 Y 0 9 , 15-4330--490-60 copies- mtcn 25.91
50-1-0-8 '14 '
a1
42
43
as
34
35
36
01-4300-110 20 ;p2 yS • 9 - .
50 1 0 8 01'-43,20-•12+30-•30 epiys 454.25
--- --
eft.. 3'+5 76
45
a6
47
46
37
38
39
ao
41
42
° .. _
Totals Ternp Check Number ^ ✓„ . z ,. ,. _ .'
mber 92
49
50
51
62
92 1 0 S 01-4300-040-40 spays 94.03
51 3-. -9- &-1 1 6421 - .
53
54
55
56
43
44
45
. 02 1 0 S ` . '01-4300-070-,70,' , .a spl ys , 34. L-`5 " " -
52 1 0 S ;1 09-43007109-15 spl'yz - - 94.23 - •
91 1 0 S. 18=4300-060=60 '14
57
58
59
60
46
47
48
--,----Totals
;a5
�- - _----
' ✓9 271.29
TCM -Cheek- -umber^ a92
61
62
63
64
50
81
Temp Check number, .92 , ': ° . ` '
, •.
67 •.
68
52
53
54
5.2 1 C m n RT 01 -e12172 22/28 pcyro l l 169. 23
942 1 i• k? A R 7 01-4134-•1 10-10 12/88 ‘ pq yr^o1 l 84.44 -
,. -. 1. 2-1-2-3-p l-1 175 7'•
69
70
71
72
55
56
yt^u
- .., • ,
•
73
74
75
01
f 7
0
"J
1)
•
----- ----
rrl,20:54 Ph City 2f Mendota Heights -
Temp Check Humber ze 0
1 11
2 Temp. 12
ChEi.C.14 I 3
3 14
Account
mber-Yendor-Name -Code ----Comments _Amol.mt
4 i b
5 1 Zercmp RT 01-4134-210-20 1/12 payroll al.Ze7
6 i a
7 i 9
aoe na0.72 !ic
8
Totals Temp Check Number ne 117
9
10
TeMp Check Number
12
85 ..hj
5';-P14-grlm-Clnrs- --01-4410-,01E.0-0 -----Dec-cIng -178
1 17
......- le
14
n3 276.*am '9,
is 19.1
terk
------T-ot-a-l-s-Temp-Check-Number
16 21
2'2
17 Temp Check Number 54 231
18 2.,11
19 . 25
54 James & Co 02-4490-105-0S svc awards ' 26
20
54 James d. Co el -44S0-08121-00 svc awards . - iton2t. 70 27
21 -
22
2ee 302.0r5 301
23
Totals Temp Check Number 54
24 3332
25 e
Temp Check Number 5n . • • „ k
34
27 , 36
n Paul 0.1,--427:88,---,2450.3 '
“.32-aer
28 37
3 Paul Kaiser 0J -442n -030-3o Jan svc as.e0 m
29
30 .
110 1-,484--a0 40
31
Temp Number , , ,
Totals TemCheck trez 42
32 e ' e
e 45
33
Temp-•Cheok-Kt.outter 56- ' 44
34 45
6
354
58 Roy KIngs/ey 0/-4415-830-30 mi relm F1 schl 61.36 ' 47
36 __ 49
t58 ' • - , ., . • , . • , 50
38 ' . ee, - ' ' • .1 ef. ''' E4.38
Totals Temp Check Number , 58 :-,,, ,51
39 • , ' - 52
40 53
41 Temp Check Number :57 54
55
42 • 56
z1......st..5„,,,,444_,447a, tal-40.320-44o=e0 (44,
-az
43- . . --" .:
' . • ,, .........
44 <•;
- 58
-," - • , - 59
• 4 .4_44,0abers , -• , , ,
...
______xc,r_a4.s......Te44,_erm.7c49
46 61
47 62
Temp.Check Number ZS • 63
48 84
tinutsoh Rubbish Service ,' 06-433Z-000-00 , , ea_
50 , ....... ' . x 67
51. , 6 , ,
...iS ..) .1'4 68
52 69
Totals Temp Check Number 58 ' 70
53 71
54 l'xotrir CI-Ii.n.te tstuntbg: 72
5573
, . e
• e
56 , , , : e , ,
59 Thomas Knuth 7 ' ,7e -491n -83n -e0 , , , ml rsimb , . , ' 1Z.,48 • ''' , 74
' 75
0
0
0
(T)
0
0
0
0
0
9
C)
•
----- ----
rrl,20:54 Ph City 2f Mendota Heights -
Temp Check Humber ze 0
1 11
2 Temp. 12
ChEi.C.14 I 3
3 14
Account
mber-Yendor-Name -Code ----Comments _Amol.mt
4 i b
5 1 Zercmp RT 01-4134-210-20 1/12 payroll al.Ze7
6 i a
7 i 9
aoe na0.72 !ic
8
Totals Temp Check Number ne 117
9
10
TeMp Check Number
12
85 ..hj
5';-P14-grlm-Clnrs- --01-4410-,01E.0-0 -----Dec-cIng -178
1 17
......- le
14
n3 276.*am '9,
is 19.1
terk
------T-ot-a-l-s-Temp-Check-Number
16 21
2'2
17 Temp Check Number 54 231
18 2.,11
19 . 25
54 James & Co 02-4490-105-0S svc awards ' 26
20
54 James d. Co el -44S0-08121-00 svc awards . - iton2t. 70 27
21 -
22
2ee 302.0r5 301
23
Totals Temp Check Number 54
24 3332
25 e
Temp Check Number 5n . • • „ k
34
27 , 36
n Paul 0.1,--427:88,---,2450.3 '
“.32-aer
28 37
3 Paul Kaiser 0J -442n -030-3o Jan svc as.e0 m
29
30 .
110 1-,484--a0 40
31
Temp Number , , ,
Totals TemCheck trez 42
32 e ' e
e 45
33
Temp-•Cheok-Kt.outter 56- ' 44
34 45
6
354
58 Roy KIngs/ey 0/-4415-830-30 mi relm F1 schl 61.36 ' 47
36 __ 49
t58 ' • - , ., . • , . • , 50
38 ' . ee, - ' ' • .1 ef. ''' E4.38
Totals Temp Check Number , 58 :-,,, ,51
39 • , ' - 52
40 53
41 Temp Check Number :57 54
55
42 • 56
z1......st..5„,,,,444_,447a, tal-40.320-44o=e0 (44,
-az
43- . . --" .:
' . • ,, .........
44 <•;
- 58
-," - • , - 59
• 4 .4_44,0abers , -• , , ,
...
______xc,r_a4.s......Te44,_erm.7c49
46 61
47 62
Temp.Check Number ZS • 63
48 84
tinutsoh Rubbish Service ,' 06-433Z-000-00 , , ea_
50 , ....... ' . x 67
51. , 6 , ,
...iS ..) .1'4 68
52 69
Totals Temp Check Number 58 ' 70
53 71
54 l'xotrir CI-Ii.n.te tstuntbg: 72
5573
, . e
• e
56 , , , : e , ,
59 Thomas Knuth 7 ' ,7e -491n -83n -e0 , , , ml rsimb , . , ' 1Z.,48 • ''' , 74
' 75
0
0
0
(T)
0
0
0
0
0
9
C)
r 1 FLeb 1.4'31
_ ..... �, ....._ �.. �� rcryc. lrc+
Fri , 1;'_:64 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 69
1
1 z
3
11
Temp_ 12
Check i -
1"
tre '--Nam 1
4
6
- s--'Verelcr Account --1 -ode —�sc mrnerlt 5 4:44700 -Mt
'19 Thomas rtnuttr 0:11 -441n -106 -az m1 re.imb 1.30
homers-rinuth---
t
5
6
7
8
8
a'6-4416-106 16 Feb allow 40.00
-=- ---•--
277 E3.79
'T
9
16
11
10
71
nTemp
-s .1�
is Check-Number----------•-•t5B
'A
Check Number 60
,6
13
14
15
17'
60 rireens Office Machines 01-4330-490-10 type nttcrl 90.05.5 ;78
60 Krechs Office Machines 01-•4330-•460-30 type mtc°n 46.00 19
b12+-H-rechp Off4oe--Machines-------01-4530-440 '2o.
17
18
CO type niton -Q*16
60 Krechs Orrice Machines 01-4330-490-60 type mtcn 46.0121
Be Krechs Office Mach1nes 17.,6-4330-490-16 type mtcn 46.00
its
21
221
3'
A
19
20
21
fKreehs-Of-r-lee-Machines 06-,4300 106 2°5, p-paaper
kel.,— —?E -x-00
60 Y'rechs Office Machines 0i -4300-J10-10 spivs 13- 6t•''
417fek
26
28
22
23
24
364 30-
Totals Temp Check Number 60
VltAtbe r fit
29
30
31
32
25
26
27
: , .
61 L £ L 9 01-0076 Feb clues ;= 1, 00
�.----
33
3A
35
36
28
29
30
b 1 � eta. 00
Totals Temp Check Number 61
37
38
39
40
31
32
3 3
.
Temp Check Number - 679
CC Lcagttc of 4911 -6+t -l -e_. 12'3--00 7, - Feb-pt.eM-
a2
43
44
34
35
36
-1
000„-
sac League or Mn Cities 01-4131-090-Z0 Feb prem 766.59
45
46.
47
3849
39
s Temp Check Number 6'i - ,. . ..
49
50
51
41
42
63 M Thomas Lawel 1 01-4416-110-10 Feb allow 170.00
^^ ---
53
54,
55
56
43
44
45
63 i 76. 00
Totals Temp Check Number 63
.. �. •, <. .- - „
57
58
59'
60
47
Temp Check N
Number 64
6) Lcc? Taro- 04-.4.9.1,6-340-60 Jan 'c''''E.
61
52
63as,
64
49
so
51
cvc
-64 Leer'- 01-4336-310-70 " Jan svc 9. 96
64 Leef Bros 16-4336-310-60 Jan svc 9.96
,......... _ _ ` _ ..—.—.—.--
65
66
67
68
52iii
53
54
;'-3.96
Totals Temp Check Number 64
69
�1
72
55
56
7
„
Temp. Check Number .- 66
-
-•.. _ _ ., - - A. - - r --
73
74
75
7.
0.
r 1 FLeb 1.4'31
_ ..... �, ....._ �.. �� rcryc. lrc+
Fri , 1;'_:64 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 69
1
1 z
3
11
Temp_ 12
Check i -
1"
tre '--Nam 1
4
6
- s--'Verelcr Account --1 -ode —�sc mrnerlt 5 4:44700 -Mt
'19 Thomas rtnuttr 0:11 -441n -106 -az m1 re.imb 1.30
homers-rinuth---
t
5
6
7
8
8
a'6-4416-106 16 Feb allow 40.00
-=- ---•--
277 E3.79
'T
9
16
11
10
71
nTemp
-s .1�
is Check-Number----------•-•t5B
'A
Check Number 60
,6
13
14
15
17'
60 rireens Office Machines 01-4330-490-10 type nttcrl 90.05.5 ;78
60 Krechs Office Machines 01-•4330-•460-30 type mtc°n 46.00 19
b12+-H-rechp Off4oe--Machines-------01-4530-440 '2o.
17
18
CO type niton -Q*16
60 Krechs Orrice Machines 01-4330-490-60 type mtcn 46.0121
Be Krechs Office Mach1nes 17.,6-4330-490-16 type mtcn 46.00
its
21
221
3'
A
19
20
21
fKreehs-Of-r-lee-Machines 06-,4300 106 2°5, p-paaper
kel.,— —?E -x-00
60 Y'rechs Office Machines 0i -4300-J10-10 spivs 13- 6t•''
417fek
26
28
22
23
24
364 30-
Totals Temp Check Number 60
VltAtbe r fit
29
30
31
32
25
26
27
: , .
61 L £ L 9 01-0076 Feb clues ;= 1, 00
�.----
33
3A
35
36
28
29
30
b 1 � eta. 00
Totals Temp Check Number 61
37
38
39
40
31
32
3 3
.
Temp Check Number - 679
CC Lcagttc of 4911 -6+t -l -e_. 12'3--00 7, - Feb-pt.eM-
a2
43
44
34
35
36
-1
000„-
sac League or Mn Cities 01-4131-090-Z0 Feb prem 766.59
45
46.
47
3849
39
s Temp Check Number 6'i - ,. . ..
49
50
51
41
42
63 M Thomas Lawel 1 01-4416-110-10 Feb allow 170.00
^^ ---
53
54,
55
56
43
44
45
63 i 76. 00
Totals Temp Check Number 63
.. �. •, <. .- - „
57
58
59'
60
47
Temp Check N
Number 64
6) Lcc? Taro- 04-.4.9.1,6-340-60 Jan 'c''''E.
61
52
63as,
64
49
so
51
cvc
-64 Leer'- 01-4336-310-70 " Jan svc 9. 96
64 Leef Bros 16-4336-310-60 Jan svc 9.96
,......... _ _ ` _ ..—.—.—.--
65
66
67
68
52iii
53
54
;'-3.96
Totals Temp Check Number 64
69
�1
72
55
56
7
„
Temp. Check Number .- 66
-
-•.. _ _ ., - - A. - - r --
73
74
75
7.
0.
Fr1, 10: 114P1't Clty or Mendota He9glts
Temp Check Number a*
2 Temp. i2
Check
Amount
7
3
4
a• . . - ender -Nam L Accc.0 ,t --Lade---- - Comn7ents
5 —_----
---
-4e.-1--4e.-17
• -EE
6
Si
6Z
E J
8 Totals Temp Check Number 6'g 1C
17
9 12
T-emp-Cheek- Pkrrnber^------•--- ---•65 -
to
:4
11
Bra f9 R 51 gn Co Inc 01 -44e0 -0e0 -e0 spays 3e4• '=`fa •
nn
66 3::`4. e0 18
14
Totals Temp Check Number 66 15
15 2G
16 21
Temp Check Number 67 22
17 23
7a24
01_-A312r�-o=o-ne spas A".�:,
6-M--P-AE:sce-2atec
1925
67 M f? Associates ates 01 43f0-1h7O-712+ spays se. 3* 26
20 67 1'l Fr Associates 1e -4305-060-6Z spays se -4e 27
2128
&.-7
7.2 ea=4305-0312r-3o spays •44 :1
67 -A -Assoc -tater 29
22 --- 30
23 ?68 ,. 3V.:$.6e 31
24 32
1 c TeMp•-lrYJSCJ:-2dUmber
25 33
34
26' Temp Check Number 6835
27 " - •• e 36
28 37
29 63 Mac Warehouse 01-4600-030-30 computer eq 936.00 38
— -- 39
30 S-.6-00 40
Y_•,
31
•. Totals Temp Check Number 60 - , 42
32 - 43
33 444
-
TCm $37ECAs-PRAMber' G'.f"
34 5
- 46
35 69 Mac Connections 131-46e0-0eo-1 computer eq 17✓01.00 47
36 pq M Connect 04=-.4ettrat-ib�2r-- comp-utztp_oq qo
-Loris
37
38
138 1,.'_'.53.VIIrl 51
3952
.7.C..rea 3 S Tfgfnp Tracy .brsr'
-fou 5
40 3
64
al Temp Check number 70 55
42 56
43 , 57
79 John Macz•ko 81-x:@118 . FII conn exp relrnb'^ . 139.63 ' a s 58
? P , " • -- 735. 3 ..
159
660
4645 7r2
Totals Temp Check Number 7¢+ •' 62
47 `. 63
48 fA
T Check Number 71
t"p r < 65
49 > • .. .. v 66
50 71 Med Centers H f-• ,01-e074, -. • Feb prem 1, 583. e0 67
5771 Med te,ore,e m �+ +911 -.,ax -41 -4101-11,1 S a.» p.�.am AP. -4 •s ms 68
5269
73 Med Centers M X• 01-4131-000-00 Feb prem L, 3*8. 9 70
53 71 Med Centers M fi 91-4132-040-40 Feb prem Z00-00 71
64?1 m..d f'rnr toe. !-r p. 91 -4133-_{moi@ F•'„ prem 1,007 O-`
- 73
55 .. w ` 74
56 + ' " i x ° ' 75
U
0
0
r-)
t_)
0
` •
Fr1, 10: 114P1't Clty or Mendota He9glts
Temp Check Number a*
2 Temp. i2
Check
Amount
7
3
4
a• . . - ender -Nam L Accc.0 ,t --Lade---- - Comn7ents
5 —_----
---
-4e.-1--4e.-17
• -EE
6
Si
6Z
E J
8 Totals Temp Check Number 6'g 1C
17
9 12
T-emp-Cheek- Pkrrnber^------•--- ---•65 -
to
:4
11
Bra f9 R 51 gn Co Inc 01 -44e0 -0e0 -e0 spays 3e4• '=`fa •
nn
66 3::`4. e0 18
14
Totals Temp Check Number 66 15
15 2G
16 21
Temp Check Number 67 22
17 23
7a24
01_-A312r�-o=o-ne spas A".�:,
6-M--P-AE:sce-2atec
1925
67 M f? Associates ates 01 43f0-1h7O-712+ spays se. 3* 26
20 67 1'l Fr Associates 1e -4305-060-6Z spays se -4e 27
2128
&.-7
7.2 ea=4305-0312r-3o spays •44 :1
67 -A -Assoc -tater 29
22 --- 30
23 ?68 ,. 3V.:$.6e 31
24 32
1 c TeMp•-lrYJSCJ:-2dUmber
25 33
34
26' Temp Check Number 6835
27 " - •• e 36
28 37
29 63 Mac Warehouse 01-4600-030-30 computer eq 936.00 38
— -- 39
30 S-.6-00 40
Y_•,
31
•. Totals Temp Check Number 60 - , 42
32 - 43
33 444
-
TCm $37ECAs-PRAMber' G'.f"
34 5
- 46
35 69 Mac Connections 131-46e0-0eo-1 computer eq 17✓01.00 47
36 pq M Connect 04=-.4ettrat-ib�2r-- comp-utztp_oq qo
-Loris
37
38
138 1,.'_'.53.VIIrl 51
3952
.7.C..rea 3 S Tfgfnp Tracy .brsr'
-fou 5
40 3
64
al Temp Check number 70 55
42 56
43 , 57
79 John Macz•ko 81-x:@118 . FII conn exp relrnb'^ . 139.63 ' a s 58
? P , " • -- 735. 3 ..
159
660
4645 7r2
Totals Temp Check Number 7¢+ •' 62
47 `. 63
48 fA
T Check Number 71
t"p r < 65
49 > • .. .. v 66
50 71 Med Centers H f-• ,01-e074, -. • Feb prem 1, 583. e0 67
5771 Med te,ore,e m �+ +911 -.,ax -41 -4101-11,1 S a.» p.�.am AP. -4 •s ms 68
5269
73 Med Centers M X• 01-4131-000-00 Feb prem L, 3*8. 9 70
53 71 Med Centers M fi 91-4132-040-40 Feb prem Z00-00 71
64?1 m..d f'rnr toe. !-r p. 91 -4133-_{moi@ F•'„ prem 1,007 O-`
- 73
55 .. w ` 74
56 + ' " i x ° ' 75
U
0
0
r-)
t_)
0
` •
a ren 3:7;a3 e. crs„,. �s w R-OLIC JO..
Pr1. 111::14 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 71
1 1
2 Temp_ : 2
3 Check '- ;
a hdor-•-Name Account -Code Eommeht-s Amoul,t +i!I
16
5 (871 Med Centers H P 02-4132-070-70 Feb prem 4:,4.60
6
71 1 lL a-Se»hers t 1 G 05-4131 2075 15 Feb -prem 3r'S. 60 j,,_j
8 71 Med Centers H P 08-433Z-000-00 Feb Ftrem iF'_2.40 X10'
71 Med Centers H P 15-4131-060-60 Feb prem 453. 70 11f
12!
10 1St
11 639 8,466.9Z 1•,
Totals Temp check Number• 71 .,
12 .1 -C,
13 17.
14 Temp Check Number 72 16j
1s.
15
ds•kota-e0etnt-ry-8l-ttb 01-4490-10.9 09 2�-1-6--r ecogrrl-t2o11 ----2-80,87
9716 ;tit
17 7e Mendaktlta Country Club tb1-4490--0 30-1 1Zc 1 / 16 recoon.t t l ol7 90.45 221
18 - -- moi -'S2 241
19 4}4• 25'
20 Totals Temp Check Number ,72 201
21 17:
73
22 - Vtirnber
23 30
73 Metro Waste Control 15-4443-060-60 Feb svc 38, 1345.08 31
24 -s2
a...7
----v ,.ice -96-000r 33
2s'-P981-=-140•5-t•-SEtnt.ra-1 1-7-'357'.3' Seb-s;:e
--._ " , , 34
26 •
248 • 36,049.00 35
- - - - 12,
'37
uMbese»
za
29 3£
30 Temp 'Check Humber 74 i • 39
40
31 • 41
74 Midwest £rnpl#ssistance Program 01-4490-110-10 , EA prog 27.50 42
32 74 Midwest Emp1 1ssistarce Program 0A -4490-0E0-20 £A prog . 17. 5.e1 43
33 GG
'-4- 6a 17-50
143. ,west--Emp3-As-2 Duanea--Program-01-�4490.=i+30 17? -pre g
34 45
74 Midwest EmplRsslstance Program 01'-4490-040-40 EA prog 17.:1121 40
35
36 74 Midwest £mplAssistance Program 0/-4490-050-50 Ea prog 17.50 47
it l-AC•C l lin$a-PMCkg r\am-all j=-cF4321=07--0 7 .1.4.4 RT 48
-t -6-rnp St -2% -Trig
37 49
°74 Midwest'£rnplAss2stance`Program 03-4490-105-15 ,Ea prog'; . ° . 17.:9121 ` 50
"54450-060-60 ,,EP; prog " - > • 17.$0 51
39' 74 Midwest Emplr'Ussistarrce Program 1-
52
ao 53
M9E 140.00 54
41
4z Totals Temp Check Number 74 55
l 56
4357
Temp Check Number , 7 k a, 58
a5 7n Midwest Pu 23q&4wa 3•` so
46 61
47 75 Midwest Business Products 01-4490-060-Z0 plaques 49.38 62
75 Midwest Business Products 02-4490-030-30 piaquea 49. e8 63
7 t72etw ` tt: 1"--4' h Afi-tatte 1„E, e. 6a
;slag,
49--- a 66
SO 300127.47 $ ? 67
.. .,> .. - . 68
51 -I' 'r 13 ,'moi! b6er' t 1-Z
52 69
53 70
Temp Cneck Number 76 71
54 72
56- - - 73
,76 Midwest Siren Service 07-4330-000-00' Jan cont! 8'�. 40 74
ss
` . t ..-- 75
.1)
•
0
0
0
J
>J
a ren 3:7;a3 e. crs„,. �s w R-OLIC JO..
Pr1. 111::14 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 71
1 1
2 Temp_ : 2
3 Check '- ;
a hdor-•-Name Account -Code Eommeht-s Amoul,t +i!I
16
5 (871 Med Centers H P 02-4132-070-70 Feb prem 4:,4.60
6
71 1 lL a-Se»hers t 1 G 05-4131 2075 15 Feb -prem 3r'S. 60 j,,_j
8 71 Med Centers H P 08-433Z-000-00 Feb Ftrem iF'_2.40 X10'
71 Med Centers H P 15-4131-060-60 Feb prem 453. 70 Ili
12!
10 1St
11 639 8,466.9Z 1•,
Totals Temp check Number• 71 .,
12 .1 -C,
13 17.
14 Temp Check Number 72 16j
1s.
15
ds•kota-e0etnt-ry-8l-ttb 01-4490-10.9 09 2�-1-6--r ecogrrl-t2o11 ----2-80,87
9716 ;tit
17 7e Mendaktlta Country Club tb1-4490--0 30-1 1Zc 1 / 16 recoon.t t l ol7 90.45 221
18 - -- moi -'S2 241
19 4}4• 25'
20 Totals Temp Check Number ,72 201
21 17:
73
22 - Vtirnber
23 30
73 Metro Waste Control 15-4443-060-60 Feb svc 38, 1345.08 31
24 -s2
a...7
----v ,.ice -96-000r
2s'-P981-=-140•5-t•-SEtnt.ra-1 1-7-'357'.3' Seb-s;:e 33
--._ " , , 34
26 •
248 • 36,049.00 35
- - - - 12,
'37
uMbese»
za
29 3£
30 Temp 'Check Humber 74 i • 39
40
31 • 41
74 Midwest £rnpl#ssistance Program 01-4490-110-10 , EA prog 27.50 42
32 74 Midwest Emp1 1ssistarce Program 0A -4490-0E0-20 £A prog . 17. 5.e1 43
33 GG
'-4- 6a 17-50
143. ,west--Emp3-As-2 Duanea--Program-01-�4490.=i+30 17? -pre g
34 45
74 Midwest EmplRsslstance Program 01'-4490-040-40 EA prog 17.:1121 40
35
36 74 Midwest £mplAssistance Program 0/-4490-050-50 Ea prog 17.50 47
it l-AC•C l lin$a-PMCkg r\am-all j=-cF4321=07--0 7 .1.4.4 RT 48
-t -6-rnp St -2% -Trig
37 49
°74 Midwest'£rplAss2stance`Program 03-4490-105-15 ,Ea prog'; . ° . 17.:9121 ` 50
"54450-060-60 ,,EP; prog " - > • 17.$0 51
39' 74 Midwest Emplr'Ussistarlce Program 1-
52
ao 53
M9E 140.00 54
41
4z Totals Temp Check Number 74 55
l 56
4357
Temp Check Number , 7 k a, 58
a5 7n Midwest Pu 23q&4wa 3•` so
46 61
47 75 Midwest Business Products 01-4490-060-Z0 plaques 49.38 62
75 Midwest Business Products 02-4490-030-30 piaquea 49. e8 63
7 t72etw ` tt: 1"--4' h Afi-tatte 1„E, e. 6a
;slag,
49--- a 66
SO 300127.47 $ ? 67
.. .,> .. - . 68
51 -I' 'r 13 ,'moi! b6er' t 1-Z
52 69
53 70
Temp Cneck Number 76 71
54 72
56- - - 73
,76 Midwest Siren Service 07-4330-000-00' Jan cont! 8'�. 40 74
ss
` . t ..-- 75
.1)
•
0
0
0
J
>J
i3
3 r= eb 23 ,1 C.1.,,5 1-4.t. Aane
'r.2,2 7 4 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 76
1
2 Temp.
Check
3 Amount
Comments
1
2
3
4
. . er—vend or -Name Account -Code —
4
5
6 Totals Temp Check Number 73
6
8
7 9
Temp Cneck Number 77 10
8 11
9 T ,--05 L72
-- M2 -nn -Cel i ul ar - Tel a -CC .-_.__ __ __ _. -02-4000-6/0-00— _ _ ___ _ _---__ __-_----Feb-svc'
1013
77 Minn Cel 2 u1 ar Te] a Co 01-4000-610-00 Feb svc 4.95 14
11 77 M2 nn Cellular' Tele Co 01-4000-610-30 Feb svc 4.95 '
117.16
-_-_.
_ -- 7
13 1
031 14.55 18
14 19
15 Totals Temp Check Number 77 20
21
76 Temp Check Number 78 22
17 23
18 24
,�..:-nriesota--13lov-e-lane— £-`•
11ys 1.E
__01-4305=-050-50 Gp
19 , 25
775 Minnesota glove Inc 01-4303-e7ib-741 splys 16.76 26.
20 78 Minnesota Wove lnc 13-430-060-50 splys 16.76 2y7�
21 • 2=1
22 29
e34 50.: 30
23 Totals Temp Check Number 78 31
24 32
2b 33
Temp Check Number 79 '• 34
26 > 35
27 36
79 7»2 r,•7 Mut.i=*j 7 i •+'e Ir6 7h+—x'`07• ' - 2 "'Pm- payroll "00 00 ' x
28 79 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-074 FebPeb prem 69.00
t"'7
29 38
79 Minn Mutual Life Ins 02-4131-000-20 Feb prem 5.10 : ,. 39
30 0
'7 7', , r7r'.•s1211=A1.31-07.0=721 Fab 1 TO
-m4.44A-mutAtal -prem
3741
42
32316 27"3. Sdr 43
33
3-emp79 -
Tomas -Cneck--Number 4544
34 >
46
35 47
Temp Check Number 947
36 48
37a 49
-tie M2 nnesot a Benefit Assn 01-0074' Feb prune ` '253.74",
253.74 - 50
39 e341 M2 i esota 3ene ri t Ass» , ar1 -42 31 -2 1 Q+-141 Feb prera 3-t 2. 30 ,,, < $ ' � 51
38'
- r •` 52
_ . - _ - - ... - Feeb 34.4 40.
_ . T7 1145-4131-i pre.1
53
40 er0 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01 -4132 -0e0 -e0 Feb prem 998. 70 54
41 80 Minnesota Benefit Assn . 01-4131-050-30 Feb prem 203.84 55
42 a,1 -aro t•f -rof2 56
F i
e,?- =771 s-b-pmwJn -4r
43 , 57
80 Minnesota Benefit Assn • 15-4131-0674-60' . ? Feb prem 115. �i5 . m
4661
Totals Temp Check Number 80 62
47 63
48 • 64
r... a
.34
66
50 Al Minnesota Mayors Assn > 01-4404-209-09 4992' dues. • . 10.00,, 67
51 '� a -- 68
5269
81 10. gra+ 70
53 Totals Temp Check Number 81 71
54 72
55 ., 73
Temp Check Number Sr. - , _. 74
56 .. • k ' « 75p
55
V R ¢. 7.
v,stY Yea.....,.a...S vs.+ Arra .—LA._laGa—••fEiq
4•a ve s v e.s
.%
n
0
0
O
t.)
.�l
i3
3 r= eb 23 ,1 C.1.,,5 1-4.t. Aane
'r.2,2 7 4 PM City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 76
1
2 Temp.
Check
3 Amount
Comments
1
2
3
4
. . er—vend or -Name Account -Code —
4
5
6 Totals Temp Check Number 73
6
8
7 9
Temp Cneck Number 77 10
8 11
9 T ,--05 L72
-- M2 -nn -Cel i ul ar - Tel a -CC .-_.__ __ __ _. -02-4000-6/0-00— _ _ ___ _ _---__ __-_----Feb-svc'
1013
77 Minn Cel 2 u1 ar Te] a Co 01-4000-610-00 Feb svc 4.95 14
11 77 M2 nn Cellular' Tele Co 01-4000-610-30 Feb svc 4.95 '
117.16
-_-_.
_ -- 7
13 1
031 14.55 18
14 19
15 Totals Temp Check Number 77 20
21
76 Temp Check Number 78 22
17 23
18 24
,�..:-nriesota--13lov-e-lane— £-`•
11ys 1.E
__01-4305=-050-50 Gp
19 , 25
775 Minnesota glove Inc 01-4303-e7ib-741 splys 16.76 26.
20 78 Minnesota Wove lnc 13-430-060-50 splys 16.76 2y7�
21 • 2=1
22 29
e34 50.: 30
23 Totals Temp Check Number 78 31
24 32
2b 33
Temp Check Number 79 '• 34
26 > 35
27 36
79 7»2 r,•7 Mut.i=*j 7 i •+'e Ir6 7h+—x'`07• ' - 2 "'Pm- payroll "00 00 ' x
28 79 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-074 FebPeb prem 69.00
t"'7
29 38
79 Minn Mutual Life Ins 02-4131-000-20 Feb prem 5.10 : ,. 39
30 0
'7 7', , r7r'.•s1211=A1.31-07.0=721 Fab 1 TO
-m4.44A-mutAtal -prem
3741
42
32316 27"3. Sdr 43
33
3-emp79 -
Tomas -Cneck--Number 4544
34 >
46
35 47
Temp Check Number 947
36 48
37a 49
-tie M2 nnesot a Benefit Assn 01-0074' Feb prune ` '253.74",
253.74 - 50
39 e341 M2 i esota 3ene ri t Ass» , ar1 -42 31 -2 1 Q+-141 Feb prera 3-t 2. 30 ,,, < $ ' � 51
38'
- r •` 52
_ . - _ - - ... - Feeb 34.4 40.
_ . T7 1145-4131-i pre.1
53
40 er0 Minnesota Benefit Assn 01 -4132 -0e0 -e0 Feb prem 998. 70 54
41 80 Minnesota Benefit Assn . 01-4131-050-30 Feb prem 203.84 55
42 a,1 -aro t•f -rof2 56
F i
e,?- =771 s-b-pmwJn -4r
43 , 57
80 Minnesota Benefit Assn • 15-4131-0674-60' . ? Feb prem 115. �i5 . m
4661
Totals Temp Check Number 80 62
47 63
48 • 64
r... a
.34
66
50 Al Minnesota Mayors Assn > 01-4404-209-09 4992' dues. • . 10.00,, 67
51 '� a -- 68
5269
81 10. gra+ 70
53 Totals Temp Check Number 81 71
54 72
55 ., 73
Temp Check Number Sr. - , _. 74
56 .. • k ' « 75p
55
V R ¢. 7.
v,stY Yea.....,.a...S vs.+ Arra .—LA._laGa—••fEiq
4•a ve s v e.s
.%
n
0
0
O
t.)
.�l
3 Feb 1883 Claims List page 3.4
Fri, 3:4 P14 City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number Oa i
1
2
3
, 1
Temp. 7 ,
Check 2'
4
'mount
4
5
6
mber-Venbor-Nam 4!occount-Code Comments
6.(
ae Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4330-450-70 splys 45.'57 7
E,
7
6e-Mfitne9[,Va-TOIC,-IrtC----- ---03-4330-4-312) 70 splys 36,50-
ea Minnesota Toro Inc 0A-4330-490-70 rtn 45.00cr 10-,
11t8
---
12.
1011
12
-L 3 3•9..-3e
13
Totais Temp Check NUM17er 80
'
13
14
I
.- p-eneck-Number --493 17
13 ,
53 Minnesota Conway 81 ^A.:1'11'11e Sp2),S 004.35 io,
:I)
16
13
- . ota-Conway -ol--4.3en-e3e--.3e, -splys 11421
83 Minnesota Conway 03-e010 splys 438. 22
--- ------
U4
1is
20
21
Totals Temp Check Number 83 " 26
\ 27
W
23
2433
-7-6"C)--441""" bo2B
29
30
84NSSA 0J -4404-050-Z0 2'351 dues 40.0121 31
_
2
2684,
27
. ' , , . 33
- 40.00 .•
• . 34
- 84 . , . 35
Totals Temp Check Number-
. . • . , . 36
28
29
3 0
37
Temp Check Number ST) 38
.
- 40
-,b40
31-
3 2
ce-t4-2-pm 1C-4-2-0e-Per1S-2-ora-1..Z111/1C-.1-3-02 ,.:.
41
— , ---------
42
85 100. 00
. 43
&.5
----T-etra-2-5—T-emp-Stlec*--Mumbey•
34
35
3
45
46
Temp Check Number SS
74
9
85 Morton Tnokol • el-44el-e*e-ze safe t sait
' .
< .• . . . .•-$
1 F.01.4.24. 52
0
41
42
C 53
Totals Temp eheck Number 08 . 54
55
5
envoi<
43_le
Tcmp Numbe» -87
58.
. , e
67 AMt3 Fire Protection - �1-44-�3-31! . ' ' ,. )-e e•g4I3 ' , • 31e. 75 , . , 59.
46
47
.
07 330.75 62
Totals Temp Check Number 87 63
64
4
.
ea-mcw_r_n_srar_r-17a. - • - • • • 1_1.e -co
2
53
54
.
— 70
00 . • 220.00 ' 71
72
Tomp-CMeek-Number i
55
Totalc
' . , , 74
.
emp Check Number . ' _ 75
TcN
3 Feb 1883 Claims List page 3.4
Fri, 3:4 P14 City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number Oa i
1
2
3
, 1
Temp. 7 ,
Check 2'
4
'mount
4
5
6
mber-Venbor-Nam 4!occount-Code Comments
6.(
ae Minnesota Toro Inc 01-4330-450-70 splys 45.'57 7
E,
7
6e-Mfitne9[,Va-TOIC,-IrtC----- ---03-4330-4-312) 70 splys 36,50-
ea Minnesota Toro Inc 0A-4330-490-70 rtn 45.00cr 10-,
11t8
---
12.
1011
12
-L 3 3•9..-3e
13
Totais Temp Check NUM17er 80
'
13
14
I
.- p-eneck-Number --493 17
13 ,
53 Minnesota Conway 81 ^A.:1'11'11e Sp2),S 004.35 io,
:I)
16
13
- . ota-Conway -ol--4.3en-e3e--.3e, -splys 11421
83 Minnesota Conway 03-e010 splys 438. 22
--- ------
U4
1is
20
21
Totals Temp Check Number 83 " 26
\ 27
W
23
2433
-7-6"C)--441""" bo2B
29
30
84NSSA 0J -4404-050-Z0 2'351 dues 40.0121 31
_
2
2684,
27
. ' , , . 33
- 40.00 .•
• . 34
- 84 . , . 35
Totals Temp Check Number-
. . • . , . 36
28
29
3 0
37
Temp Check Number ST) 38
.
- 40
-,b40
31-
3 2
ce-t4-2-pm 1C-4-2-0e-Per1S-2-ora-1..Z111/1C-.1-3-02 ,.:.
41
— , ---------
42
85 100. 00
. 43
&.5
----T-etra-2-5—T-emp-Stlec*--Mumbey•
34
35
3
45
46
Temp Check Number SS
74
9
85 Morton Tnokol • el-44el-e*e-ze safe t sait
' .
< .• . . . .•-$
1 F.01.4.24. 52
0
41
42
C 53
Totals Temp eheck Number 08 . 54
55
5
envoi<
43_le
Tcmp Numbe» -87
58.
. , e
67 AMt3 Fire Protection - �1-44-�3-31! . ' ' ,. )-e e•g4I3 ' , • 31e. 75 , . , 59.
46
47
.
07 330.75 62
Totals Temp Check Number 87 63
64
4
.
ea-mcw_r_n_srar_r-17a. - • - • • • 1_1.e -co
2
53
54
.
— 70
00 . • 220.00 ' 71
72
Tomp-CMeek-Number i
55
Totalc
' . , , 74
.
emp Check Number . ' _ 75
TcN
J UWS twit
L W N
m W V Clf A A (J
nAr + O
m W V(JWi twit d
2 N w
O tl NW
V ONi iNJt a {N.i N+
O t0
m V 01
N N
W
N+ O
W W
V W W A
W N+
m
Cy
m
n
x
c
ii
0
,
`�
- R)n
11 7
fvu
U 45
C u,
µ
3
a
r
Y
0 G
t.
0
r.r
aIn
, V
I'0
N
n
c
mro
'
IjJ
n
3
CF
ro
'
t "'
1
s,
7
a -
iA
CS
3+
pt
to
V
7
m
#
t tb L{t
t b b
"i% i�
(o ro
h st
0a
3 i
wwc.uh.
nn
x
, as
L.• M
3
0 0
it
4545454545
fy
5
rS
0
1
VaI '�`
Y.,r
..
3
w
645 2
i 5g9
Vi t¢
t .b
. %l v
i m m
et tY
mm
; 3
nn
x
ay
4 1..
r 3 C{
a,t
0 0 i
l LI
6 1�
�
0
5
5
L17
1
1
a
4
t -
7
to
v U
''''S•4 -Peat Tfarwl ck 1114.331'• IS Co a'a1 ^4 eZS+-138+-30 = prr�gress' 13114 1 »g ° �` ` `" 4 i'1 i *490.8+0 - '"
94 Peat Marwick. Mal»' it Co
-RcEQk-132a-3 . 1
Ise met_
.. '.Y r:' t .r
11 J. 4.1.o.,.."... M.n�ws.., tel. .n ` •v ,i.,, e' Q
w �
�-f ✓. fl.' f� `y+:-4•+�'A �.i'7—dfA--.-_._..._+. .� .� 1'Ti 7f VV.
I7
m
n
x
3
Q
m
S{s I
Gt 1
ro
rt
..
g
Ri
Y
t
9 G�ri
Y
:
l'
Y
1
't
t
C5
hi
n
x
>Y
RI
w
n t5
K JS
.-
m
h
0
asi
c`
a
m
-sr
t5
..
w
5
Se Oxygen Service Co 09-433:3-000-00 cvi triru 1113 4. n0
se Oxygen Service Co )211-4311Z-030-30 cy1 thru 1J 13.:r0
m
v_
h
m
0
x
Z
3` tI
a
ro
-
lD
,
t 5 1
r0 I
7
n
0
u
I.
Totals Temp Check n$urtier 90
Te cX Plumber 1- - - --_
• S1 Oakcrest riennel s 01 -41'203 -800-90 Jan svc ' 1 3Z. 4�0 ' :
•
s- Oakdrost-Keennea-s S1.-40:`Z=c'W -VIP Jar? svc 1.04.-00
I
d I
d i
5 I
J
G
0
7
m
7
N
i
o
1
-a
5
x•
W
W
5
5
qqi
6
1
Yi
"}
-4
i
EC "1
m y
n IA
x
i di
3
tt
`-,9r
m
n
5. i
�
W
V
C+
r
m
3
NIN
W
U
i•
I
0
s
-
3
0:S
a
Nw
err:
-aiR
n.0
O
mro
r
I
I
x'
raw
1
!1!
I
Isoi
.
3,
0
4
e
"i
3
3
0
33
0 I
F
-s
0 0 Z.
-C 7
N rt) a
5 U
a U 3
: 5
Cl
1 J
a N
l I)
'C
V1-..
[54
m 3
n -0
x.
n
a
0
a
0
-
01M
1 JV 'i.' Z,'
V O'
W W 0N W t WW N1 W
WOW g N
W W 2 N
2 OWW
A
A W
A A N +
O W W WV
Si WII
A'W W N
NV N N
NA W3 N +
ON V
V
t o 4)
+0WJ-.W
W"-'
0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0
0
J UWS twit
L W N
m W V Clf A A (J
nAr + O
m W V(JWi twit d
2 N w
O tl NW
V ONi iNJt a {N.i N+
O t0
m V 01
N N
W
N+ O
W W
V W W A
W N+
m
Cy
m
n
x
c
ii
0
,
`�
- R)n
11 7
fvu
U 45
C u,
µ
3
a
r
Y
0 G
t.
0
r.r
aIn
, V
I'0
N
n
c
mro
'
IjJ
n
3
CF
ro
'
t "'
1
s,
7
a -
iA
CS
3+
pt
to
V
7
m
#
t tb L{t
t b b
"i% i�
(o ro
h st
0a
3 i
wwc.uh.
nn
x
, as
L.• M
3
0 0
it
4545454545
fy
5
rS
0
1
VaI '�`
Y.,r
..
3
w
645 2
i 5g9
Vi t¢
t .b
. %l v
i m m
et tY
mm
; 3
nn
x
ay
4 1..
r 3 C{
a,t
0 0 i
l LI
6 1�
�
0
5
5
L17
1
1
a
4
t -
7
to
v U
''''S•4 -Peat Tfarwl ck 1114.331'• IS Co a'a1 ^4 eZS+-138+-30 = prr�gress' 13114 1 »g ° �` ` `" 4 i'1 i *490.8+0 - '"
94 Peat Marwick. Mal»' it Co
-RcEQk-132a-3 . 1
Ise met_
.. '.Y r:' t .r
11 J. 4.1.o.,.."... M.n�ws.., tel. .n ` •v ,i.,, e' Q
w �
�-f ✓. fl.' f� `y+:-4•+�'A �.i'7—dfA--.-_._..._+. .� .� 1'Ti 7f VV.
I7
m
n
x
3
Q
m
S{s I
Gt 1
ro
rt
..
g
Ri
Y
t
9 G�ri
Y
:
l'
Y
1
't
t
C5
hi
n
x
>Y
RI
w
n t5
K JS
.-
m
h
0
asi
c`
a
m
-sr
t5
..
w
5
Se Oxygen Service Co 09-433:3-000-00 cvi triru 1113 4. n0
se Oxygen Service Co )211-4311Z-030-30 cy1 thru 1J 13.:r0
m
v_
h
m
0
x
Z
3` tI
a
ro
-
lD
,
t 5 1
r0 I
7
n
0
u
I.
Totals Temp Check n$urtier 90
Te cX Plumber 1- - - --_
• S1 Oakcrest riennel s 01 -41'203 -800-90 Jan svc ' 1 3Z. 4�0 ' :
•
s- Oakdrost-Keennea-s S1.-40:`Z=c'W -VIP Jar? svc 1.04.-00
I
d I
d i
5 I
J
G
0
7
m
7
N
i
o
1
-a
5
x•
W
W
5
5
qqi
6
1
Yi
"}
-4
i
EC "1
m y
n IA
x
i di
3
tt
`-,9r
m
n
5. i
�
W
V
C+
r
m
3
NIN
W
U
i•
I
0
s
-
3
0:S
a
Nw
err:
-aiR
n.0
O
mro
r
I
I
x'
raw
1
!1!
I
Isoi
.
3,
0
4
e
"i
3
3
0
33
0 I
F
-s
0 0 Z.
-C 7
N rt) a
5 U
a U 3
: 5
Cl
1 J
a N
l I)
'C
V1-..
[54
m 3
n -0
x.
n
a
0
a
0
-
01M
1 JV 'i.' Z,'
V O'
W W 0N W t WW N1 W
WOW g N
W W 2 N
2 OWW
A
A W
A A N +
O W W WV
Si WII
A'W W N
NV N N
NA W3 N +
ON V
V
t o 4)
+0WJ-.W
W"-'
0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0
0
I Feb 1991 7.:..laam.5. i...4
Pri.121,:54 PM City of Mentlot Heinnts
$
Temp Check Number 95 i
2
2
Temp. 1
1.. :
Check ...
'4
—Number—Vent:1,o-
4
Na .Pccount-Code --Commente --ci'mottrrt
' 90 Leonard Perron 01 -4E60 -500 -30 1991 snowplow.1 ng 7E.0. aro
5
67
e
7
8
925 i_conape-Pe/Ar0T7 OS -4335-0010- 00 0 -H-S-710WOOW2flO -3 6124 00
9
— ----„----- 10
80.5 1, 980. 00 11
17
10
11
i•
Tot dt- Teirip-Stlecir -Number-- 95 , i•
14
, .
Temp Check Number S6 IL, •
ic;
1
14
15
56 Plaza Tire 6 SVc 0/ -4330 -440 -eet tires 65.47
_
ii
u,
2U
16
17
3G 6t_i.-47
TC1ta2.9, Temp Check Number 96
21
22
23e.
26
1
2
21
p C77 OC74--4,L1 fOr3er —97
, .
, 57 Power 62.,.ake Entrp 01-4330-490-50 splys 17e. 39 ,
1
22
2
24
97 170. 39
•
Totals Temp Check Number 97
29
•
1
32
2
27
,
,, Temp Check 14urstber SS , -• . , • , -, • „
. , , ,
''' , , . •- ‘, ,
- ,. ,
34
6
2
2
3
5.5 ao Reeeu
rto
-- —.... -- — —
56 I
37
n
4
3141
2.
3
33
Tot alb. Itemp---SPack-Mumbers
.
Temp Check Mumper 99 , , . f
.
.
42,
4
44
34
346
36
55 Etri'er Riebe 01-4330-460-30 rprs 100. 00
-- — — — — — —
00
45
47
399
7
,
TotasTempCheCk ,lumber
a ,. ...,,„
, "•-.
, -
49
50
52
0
42
Tcmp C'hcck Ntimber------1430
"
100 S 6 T Dr flce Products 12,5-4317re - 2 er*— 1.5 splys • 3. 2 9
ti1::—.4322.-121--4-42rS.- - P.3
3
54
55
56
4
- e 64-45 1 P23''z
''''.. ';',.. ' , ' 'L.., . ' , s • ,, ,- , an„ rilii , , '.,.•-% :.,, • , -,,',.„
" -e 2 124, S A T Office ducts , , '' 211/ -43221070110-00 - , '''' - , , -„,„' L •••.' ' ' '1,..• •:: piye .•••
9„.` & T Office Products' ef4-4perefeeet -no, ', return ° ... s ,. 9. aocr " •
.,. , .4 , r , ... , ' ' , r •
° , '60
59
46
7
4220 07. 50 •
Totals Temp Check Number48 /00
61
52
63
64
47
5
P . . .... . . . . . -• ,
em. ,., , 4, .. , • ,,,,,•: • - •
• ,' . < .
r . .. ,„. .
' 0.2--,-.4•?•.•,25-1 -4' -''.• — 11:4 . '
si
68
5269
54
101 2_ E Staamansuissy-.1-2- ...
2 03 1_ E Shaughnessy Jr 05-4880-1 3e-15 . Jan svc 1654 85
101 L e Shaughnessy Jr az -4eee -132 -50 Jan svc . ZSZ. 30
....
Ts^ 1213-4St-'0=4,-.3S.4T,D a.-1 svcIALe-am
25
71
72
56
---1-02--2.--S-.924•a•tignAsus-y
, , e . , •
. ,
. .
'
7
7
0
0
I Feb 1991 7.:..laam.5. i...4
Pri.121,:54 PM City of Mentlot Heinnts
$
Temp Check Number 95 i
2
2
Temp. 1
1.. :
Check ...
'4
—Number—Vent:1,o-
4
Na .Pccount-Code --Commente --ci'mottrrt
' 90 Leonard Perron 01 -4E60 -500 -30 1991 snowplow.1 ng 7E.0. aro
5
67
e
7
8
925 i_conape-Pe/Ar0T7 OS -4335-0010- 00 0 -H-S-710WOOW2flO -3 6124 00
9
— ----„----- 10
80.5 1, 980. 00 11
17
10
11
i•
Tot dt- Teirip-Stlecir -Number-- 95 , i•
14
, .
Temp Check Number S6 IL, •
ic;
1
14
15
56 Plaza Tire 6 SVc 0/ -4330 -440 -eet tires 65.47
_
ii
u,
2U
16
17
3G 6t_i.-47
TC1ta2.9, Temp Check Number 96
21
22
23e.
26
1
2
21
p C77 OC74--4,L1 fOr3er —97
, .
, 57 Power 62.,.ake Entrp 01-4330-490-50 splys 17e. 39 ,
1
22
2
24
97 170. 39
•
Totals Temp Check Number 97
29
•
1
32
2
27
,
,, Temp Check 14urstber SS , -• . , • , -, • „
. , , ,
''' , , . •- ‘, ,
- ,. ,
34
6
2
2
3
5.5 ao Reeeu
rto
-- —.... -- — —
56 I
37
n
4
3141
2.
3
33
Tot alb. Itemp---SPack-Mumbers
.
Temp Check Mumper 99 , , . f
.
.
42,
4
44
34
346
36
55 Etri'er Riebe 01-4330-460-30 rprs 100. 00
-- — — — — — —
00
45
47
399
7
,
TotasTempCheCk ,lumber
a ,. ...,,„
, "•-.
, -
49
50
52
0
42
Tcmp C'hcck Ntimber------1430
"
100 S 6 T Dr flce Products 12,5-4317re - 2 er*— 1.5 splys • 3. 2 9
ti1::—.4322.-121--4-42rS.- - P.3
3
54
55
56
4
- e 64-45 1 P23''z
''''.. ';',.. ' , ' 'L.., . ' , s • ,, ,- , an„ rilii , , '.,.•-% :.,, • , -,,',.„
" -e 2 124, S A T Office ducts , , '' 211/ -43221070110-00 - , '''' - , , -„,„' L •••.' ' ' '1,..• •:: piye .•••
9„.` & T Office Products' ef4-4perefeeet -no, ', return ° ... s ,. 9. aocr " •
.,. , .4 , r , ... , ' ' , r •
° , '60
59
46
7
4220 07. 50 •
Totals Temp Check Number48 /00
61
52
63
64
47
5
P . . .... . . . . . -• ,
em. ,., , 4, .. , • ,,,,,•: • - •
• ,' . < .
r . .. ,„. .
' 0.2--,-.4•?•.•,25-1 -4' -''.• — 11:4 . '
si
68
5269
54
101 2_ E Staamansuissy-.1-2- ...
2 03 1_ E Shaughnessy Jr 05-4880-1 3e-15 . Jan svc 1654 85
101 L e Shaughnessy Jr az -4eee -132 -50 Jan svc . ZSZ. 30
....
Ts^ 1213-4St-'0=4,-.3S.4T,D a.-1 svcIALe-am
25
71
72
56
---1-02--2.--S-.924•a•tignAsus-y
, , e . , •
. ,
. .
'
7
7
0
0
1 f'et, 11 LIBIMS L3Sr
Pr1,15:54 PM City or Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 101
1
2
Temp.
Check
Arno •
1
•
33
4
7-14-arstrJer—Verrcl-or•-fgerne-
Account- Cocle roMment .•
101 t. e Shaughnessy Jr el-4eeo-13e-00 Jan svc 199.00
Jan_svc iyAF.6.0=
76
79
9
101 -2, -5 -Shaughnessy -Jr- -14--425-0-135-00 ,
102 L e Shaughnessy Jr le-4.2z0-l3e-0e Jan svc 360.9
---
4,145-1,,-;
15,
II
12
10
2
707
Totals Temp Check Number 101
13
14
15
m
1
Nm
15,
p....Chalumber. 102
221.1, -Solberg Aggregate 1213 -44z2 -0:50-s0 sand 1,321.41 •
17
191
20
1621
17
19
lea' 1,137.41
Totals Temp Check Number 105
n
23
24
19
20
0
Temp Check Number 103
.
-•
25
26
2
.1!-----2-03.-at-eo,14-ng-e-lect4'..lic-
22
23
24
-.74-,,433V-31-0.,,30 sply
103 3ter2ing Electric 01-4305-050-M0 splys s.ala
103 Sterling Elects -lc 01-4335-315-30 splys 131.05
'Iter.-.4-4-ng-E-lect--c 0.1=433Z,31 '-(32-31 .-4,. 432
29
30
31
2642e
27
101 -0=Z0 .
,
' , •
• T v I.9•18.89
. ,
- •isvx ---•
33
34
35
36
2837
29
3
•• - • • •
, •
.
Temp Check Number 204,
38
35
40
31.
32
33
,41
.. 45.120 , •
104 Team Electronlcs 01-4330-450-30 .
---
44-1.,ag,
42
43
44
34
35
aE____Tamp_atwmu_pturnt-n=r.
11;
Totals Temp Check 'number 104
105
41
40
47
48
37
38
, . - 4
- ' ;1 .
205 James Tscha 15-3400 swr adj r?d, ' . 5.20' ' < "
49
50
51
52
40
41
42
105 155.00
Temp efts. k Humber 105 • .
-Totals• ,
53
55
56
- . . .•
Temp Check Number 105 .. '^-
^
1,3%1,4 _
57
60
46
• 47
48
_ . --------
--
105 1,351.44
Temp Cbe 'umber 1 . '
61
62
03
64
4965
Totals
. .
* - . , ' '
'Temp Check Number 107 ' ,
1
66
67
68
5269
54
107 U 5 West Communlcations 25-4510-12160-s0 Jan
107 U 5 West Communlcatlons 03-4510-105-15 Jan svc 155.51
, -Jam 2.1 0 .
70
71
72
55
.k7
-iileC
. . .
, . ^ . ° r , + .
73
74
75
79
,••
0
0
0
0
1 f'et, 11 LIBIMS L3Sr
Pr1,15:54 PM City or Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 101
1
2
Temp.
Check
Arno •
1
•
33
4
7-14-arstrJer—Verrcl-or•-fgerne-
Account- Cocle roMment .•
101 t. e Shaughnessy Jr el-4eeo-13e-00 Jan svc 199.00
Jan_svc iyAF.6.0=
76
79
9
101 -2, -5 -Shaughnessy -Jr- -14--425-0-135-00 ,
102 L e Shaughnessy Jr le-4.2z0-l3e-0e Jan svc 360.9
---
4,145-1,,-;
15,
II
12
10
2
707
Totals Temp Check Number 101
13
14
15
m
1
Nm
15,
p....Chalumber. 102
221.1, -Solberg Aggregate 1213 -44z2 -0:50-s0 sand 1,321.41 •
17
191
20
1621
17
19
lea' 1,137.41
Totals Temp Check Number 105
n
23
24
19
20
0
Temp Check Number 103
.
-•
25
26
2
.1!-----2-03.-at-eo,14-ng-e-lect4'..lic-
22
23
24
-.74-,,433V-31-0.,,30 sply
103 3ter2ing Electric 01-4305-050-M0 splys s.ala
103 Sterling Elects -lc 01-4335-315-30 splys 131.05
'Iter.-.4-4-ng-E-lect--c 0.1=433Z,31 '-(32-31 .-4,. 432
29
30
31
2642e
27
101 -0=Z0 .
,
' , •
• T v I.9•18.89
. ,
- •isvx ---•
33
34
35
36
2837
29
3
•• - • • •
, •
.
Temp Check Number 204,
38
35
40
31.
32
33
,41
.. 45.120 , •
104 Team Electronlcs 01-4330-450-30 .
---
44-1.,ag,
42
43
44
34
35
aE____Tamp_atwmu_pturnt-n=r.
11;
Totals Temp Check 'number 104
105
41
40
47
48
37
38
, . - 4
- ' ;1 .
205 James Tscha 15-3400 swr adj r?d, ' . 5.20' ' < "
49
50
51
52
40
41
42
105 155.00
Temp efts. k Humber 105 • .
-Totals• ,
53
55
56
- . . .•
Temp Check Number 105 .. '^-
^
1,3%1,4 _
57
60
46
• 47
48
_ . --------
--
105 1,351.44
Temp Cbe 'umber 1 . '
61
62
03
64
4965
Totals
. .
* - . , ' '
'Temp Check Number 107 ' ,
1
66
67
68
5269
54
107 U 5 West Communlcations 25-4510-12160-s0 Jan
107 U 5 West Communlcatlons 03-4510-105-15 Jan svc 155.51
, -Jam 2.1 0 .
70
71
72
55
.k7
-iileC
. . .
, . ^ . ° r , + .
73
74
75
79
,••
0
0
0
0
1 Peb 1991 Claims 'List Pane ip
Er1,2e:54 PM Clty of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 107 1
1
2
Temp.
Check
1
2
3
4
5
Numb - ehdol--Nam Account -Code Comments --Amount
1%217 U S West Communications 7211 -4S10 -W50 -S0 Jan svc 04.10
al.
5
; 1
s
s
WY -S-West-Communicat-lons 2n-4e2o-ose-60 Jen-evc ----,..:7,-3.
207 u 9 West Communications 02-4e20-070-70 Jan svc 090.91
207 u 9 west Communications 02 -4e20 -220-2e Jan svc 330.2n
.12,
icu
llr
10
2
.07 U 9 West-Commucat-l-oms--- -02-494o-oeo-eo Jer7-svc -t!-,os.5*
73
107 U $ West Communications 01-4020-040-40 Jan svc 96.02 14 .
--- -------- 15.'
1G
5era3.--40
1
14
1
963 , -2 i
Totalsk Temp ChecNumber 107 1
20
16
17
T Cee*—Nitifitter 108
100 United Way St Paul 02-2070 Jan/F'eb contr 396.90
----
21
22
23
24
20
21
.
,
h306.ne -
Totals Temp Check Number 108 . -
' . ,
6
222
282
22
24
Temp c23 heck t4umber 109
30
2
26
27
eld 151-7.43005-090-9035-99
109 West Weld '4 01-4309-070-70 splys - . . _ 38.99 , '
. ,
109 west Weld . ,. -215-4309-060-1220 ' , ,. splys ' ' 38.99 „• , .
4 e
----•
34
3
3
2837
29
30
387 119.69 .
Totals Nm . , Temp Check uber 109'
, .
as
39
40
'32
33
• -
emp Check Number .
. '
s
.
30 F-e4:2--pr.em
4
4
35.
n
110 I. c3tcr-h-L-1-re-111s 01-410Z-032
-- ----
110 - 246.-20
45
46
47
49
37
3
Tota3-s-T-ecnec44-74mmwer, 24-0
. ,
; .
. . ', 4 • •
Temp Check Number % ' 122 . . ,
,
'.' . • .
49
50
51
52
41
42
112 WM11,1 . . 01-6'020 . . fire prev messages 1Z9.00
1-a-fs"'...2to
54
5
221
Totals Temp Check Hum „.1l ,,-
, . . ,., , 4 , ,<, '.', , . •
' •t. ,t „ 'As. , ,:' , t .
. , . -;
'
59
60
46
47
Tamp Chcric Number 110
.
, •
ale R 0 Whitace 6 00 02-430*-eno-zo splys 49.65
- --
61
52
63
64
49
50
51„*
—
. <
. 11e , ,. . . 4.68 •
,
,;•- - " . , .„ i '
Totals Temp Check Number ,,„.110 . 4. I
' ' ^ , „ .- - -
67
66
52
54
Terstp Check Number, 213 .
. . ,
.
.
213 W.Inthr,41 6mal-nat4-rua 95=40-57=864=00 ” r"si's"-t-a-Peea-1—
69
70
71
72
.F
,
, .
. , .
. , . - , ,,
,
- • , . .
73
75
0
1 Peb 1991 Claims 'List Pane ip
Er1,2e:54 PM Clty of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 107 1
1
2
Temp.
Check
1
2
3
4
5
Numb - ehdol--Nam Account -Code Comments --Amount
1%217 U S West Communications 7211 -4S10 -W50 -S0 Jan svc 04.10
al.
5
; 1
s
s
WY -S-West-Communicat-lons 2n-4e2o-ose-60 Jen-evc ----,..:7,-3.
207 u 9 West Communications 02-4e20-070-70 Jan svc 090.91
207 u 9 west Communications 02 -4e20 -220-2e Jan svc 330.2n
.12,
icu
llr
10
2
.07 U 9 West-Commucat-l-oms--- -02-494o-oeo-eo Jer7-svc -t!-,os.5*
73
107 U $ West Communications 01-4020-040-40 Jan svc 96.02 14 .
--- -------- 15.'
1G
5era3.--40
1
14
1
963 , -2 i
Totalsk Temp ChecNumber 107 1
20
16
17
T Cee*—Nitifitter 108
100 United Way St Paul 02-2070 Jan/F'eb contr 396.90
----
21
22
23
24
20
21
.
,
h306.ne -
Totals Temp Check Number 108 . -
' . ,
6
222
282
22
24
Temp c23 heck t4umber 109
30
2
26
27
eld 151-7.43005-090-9035-99
109 West Weld '4 01-4309-070-70 splys - . . _ 38.99 , '
. ,
109 west Weld . ,. -215-4309-060-1220 ' , ,. splys ' ' 38.99 „• , .
4 e
----•
34
3
3
2837
29
30
387 119.69 .
Totals Nm . , Temp Check uber 109'
, .
as
39
40
'32
33
• -
emp Check Number .
. '
s
.
30 F-e4:2--pr.em
4
4
35.
n
110 I. c3tcr-h-L-1-re-111s 01-410Z-032
-- ----
110 - 246.-20
45
46
47
49
37
3
Tota3-s-T-ecnec44-74mmwer, 24-0
. ,
; .
. . ', 4 • •
Temp Check Number % ' 122 . . ,
,
'.' . • .
49
50
51
52
41
42
112 WM11,1 . . 01-6'020 . . fire prev messages 1Z9.00
1-a-fs"'...2to
54
5
221
Totals Temp Check Hum „.1l ,,-
, . . ,., , 4 , ,<, '.', , . •
' •t. ,t „ 'As. , ,:' , t .
. , . -;
'
59
60
46
47
Tamp Chcric Number 110
.
, •
ale R 0 Whitace 6 00 02-430*-eno-zo splys 49.65
- --
61
52
63
64
49
50
51„*
—
. <
. 11e , ,. . . 4.68 •
,
,;•- - " . , .„ i '
Totals Temp Check Number ,,„.110 . 4. I
' ' ^ , „ .- - -
67
66
52
54
Terstp Check Number, 213 .
. . ,
.
.
213 W.Inthr,41 6mal-nat4-rua 95=40-57=864=00 ” r"si's"-t-a-Peea-1—
69
70
71
72
.F
,
, .
. , .
. , . - , ,,
,
- • , . .
73
75
0
•
a rEnj 3'="Va .....,=,41.4 ......... -
Fri. 10:1,4 Pfd . City of Mendota Heights
. . .
Temp Zheck Number 113 .
2
Temp.
CtleCk .
t.maur.t
1
2
3
4
. mtier-vernicrr-Nanie ACCOUnt-COde
133 Winthrop Cc Weinstine 1:55 -4e87 -864 -Vat Re assmappeal *75.ver
5
i
;t
8
4
5
6
aze 1, 031. elet ,
Totals Temp Check Number 113
9
1(3
1i
12
14
15
16
7
Temp'IT
mr 314
Zeck Nuoe
h
10
14
15
11 1 Zacks-Thc- _____ ea ,...43Ve,,tatith-rife- splys- -I= .E....
334 :Lacks /nc 01-430:1-070-70 spays 15t.i. 6Z
114 Zack s Inc 21.1-43e5-060-60 splys 213.62
—
10
19
20
1621
17
18
3.4g.'. 466. el
Totals Temp Check Number 114
22
23
24
1
20
21
,.
r . , , ,
,
, , ..
25
26
27
39-
29
30
31
32
22
23
24
grand Total
MANUAL CHECKS
26
27.
'
., • °' 12967 " 58.23 'Donn Anderson , • . Expense retie „• -<,-
• 12968 ' 45.00 , Minn•Trkg , Assn < - ' regr,--- . , • ,-
33
35
35
37
38
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
28
29
30
129b9 /84.80 Clayton Engel pers secs thru 1/11
12970 20.54 Kevin Batchelder ' expense reimb - .
12971 36.40 John Boland , ..e ......... ', -
32
33
. ..° 12972 3,7444:00 , Kurz- *1.- *e: Sibiey;com2ort StatGlofl
•°' ,
. . • '12/28 payroll ,. ‘,..
. 12973 7,851.70 Fara ,
- , 12974 3,592.32 SCCU • • < < ' 1/11 payroll deckle ons ,..
34
35
36
• 12975 500.00 DakotaCounty Banic
12976 13,495.89 !I . 1/11 w/h
12977 3,099.36 Commissioner of revenue rs
, , 1297-8 44;769.27 Payroll . /11 -net , .„•• .
.ti <, 12979 ' ;` 133.80 R.' Devine "•.'' adj ....
,': ' , ; . . , `" ' -•< ='; .,' -;• <:, '<., • --
-
. •• - . -..Y ' "
"' , 12980 ' - 253.34 Donn Anderson , >. expense reimb -;' ..• ,- ,- • _ '
49
50
51
52
3 7
38
39,
40
41
42
12981----22-0.00 LMC , • regr , .. . -
.129E3 2.43 IRS _ - lax balance 4th qtr : ' ••• :i , ', °; : , .4
12984 787.00 Mn Benefit assn . Jan, Feb adj
53
54
55
56
57
59
60
6
6
6
64
45
... , , 12985392.32. SCCU.. .:„, <„,":1, ,. 1/25 ,payrol :i• .„, , , ,,,, .„
,,, ,
, • • 12986 '• • 7,820.84 ,<, Para ". r • ' . -1/11 payroll<$ <• 4', i'' • '4::, <,
, ',!:',.
- ' '° 12987 ' 784.80 Clayton Engel •'' "--,%•-- .- svc thru 2/25 - • -- . . ., _ - < '
47
48
• -. -12988 . 500.00 Dakota Co < 1/25 payroll deductions. .. -
.
12989 13,328.50 .. a - 1/25 w/h , , . 7 . .
• 12990 43,570.14 payroll a/c. , 1/25 net ,7 . . - • , •••• - , - -
so
51
, -•
. , 2991 ,-,. ,' ,093.98 < CommRevenue _ .. .•-. 1/25.,w/h •
. '12992 , '-.!-- 49:11, im Blaeser ', ' „ .1.; , < 1 e-rp'reimb'
IC ,
, ,, ,, , • 12993 „ -,"205.49; 4 payroll a/o «'-- ' : ,`:','. '.<r1/25 'deposit ,adj`," , 4
:,,,,--,,,,,
. ,
67
68
-
152,239.26 _ - -.
69
70
71
72
52
53
54
55
56
7
' , G.T. 261,005.90 , ,
. -‚°. , . .-
, . - ...
.. "..
.
73
74
75
Q
0
, C)
•
a rEnj 3'="Va .....,=,41.4 ......... -
Fri. 10:1,4 Pfd . City of Mendota Heights
. . .
Temp Zheck Number 113 .
2
Temp.
CtleCk .
t.maur.t
1
2
3
4
. mtier-vernicrr-Nanie ACCOUnt-COde
133 Winthrop Cc Weinstine 1:55 -4e87 -864 -Vat Re assmappeal *75.ver
5
i
;t
8
4
5
6
aze 1, 031. elet ,
Totals Temp Check Number 113
9
1(3
1i
12
14
15
16
7
Temp'IT
mr 314
Zeck Nuoe
h
10
14
15
11 1 Zacks-Thc- _____ ea ,...43Ve,,tatith-rife- splys- -I= .E....
334 :Lacks /nc 01-430:1-070-70 spays 15t.i. 6Z
114 Zack s Inc 21.1-43e5-060-60 splys 213.62
—
10
19
20
1621
17
18
3.4g.'. 466. el
Totals Temp Check Number 114
22
23
24
1
20
21
,.
r . , , ,
,
, , ..
25
26
27
39-
29
30
31
32
22
23
24
grand Total
MANUAL CHECKS
26
27.
'
., • °' 12967 " 58.23 'Donn Anderson , • . Expense retie „• -<,-
• 12968 ' 45.00 , Minn•Trkg , Assn < - ' regr,--- . , • ,-
33
35
35
37
38
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
28
29
30
129b9 /84.80 Clayton Engel pers secs thru 1/11
12970 20.54 Kevin Batchelder ' expense reimb - .
12971 36.40 John Boland , ..e ......... ', -
32
33
. ..° 12972 3,7444:00 , Kurz- *1.- *e: Sibiey;com2ort StatGlofl
•°' ,
. . • '12/28 payroll ,. ‘,..
. 12973 7,851.70 Fara ,
- , 12974 3,592.32 SCCU • • < < ' 1/11 payroll deckle ons ,..
34
35
36
• 12975 500.00 DakotaCounty Banic
12976 13,495.89 !I . 1/11 w/h
12977 3,099.36 Commissioner of revenue rs
, , 1297-8 44;769.27 Payroll . /11 -net , .„•• .
.ti <, 12979 ' ;` 133.80 R.' Devine "•.'' adj ....
,': ' , ; . . , `" ' -•< ='; .,' -;• <:, '<., • --
-
. •• - . -..Y ' "
"' , 12980 ' - 253.34 Donn Anderson , >. expense reimb -;' ..• ,- ,- • _ '
49
50
51
52
3 7
38
39,
40
41
42
12981----22-0.00 LMC , • regr , .. . -
.129E3 2.43 IRS _ - lax balance 4th qtr : ' ••• :i , ', °; : , .4
12984 787.00 Mn Benefit assn . Jan, Feb adj
53
54
55
56
57
59
60
6
6
6
64
45
... , , 12985392.32. SCCU.. .:„, <„,":1, ,. 1/25 ,payrol :i• .„, , , ,,,, .„
,,, ,
, • • 12986 '• • 7,820.84 ,<, Para ". r • ' . -1/11 payroll<$ <• 4', i'' • '4::, <,
, ',!:',.
- ' '° 12987 ' 784.80 Clayton Engel •'' "--,%•-- .- svc thru 2/25 - • -- . . ., _ - < '
47
48
• -. -12988 . 500.00 Dakota Co < 1/25 payroll deductions. .. -
.
12989 13,328.50 .. a - 1/25 w/h , , . 7 . .
• 12990 43,570.14 payroll a/c. , 1/25 net ,7 . . - • , •••• - , - -
so
51
, -•
. , 2991 ,-,. ,' ,093.98 < CommRevenue _ .. .•-. 1/25.,w/h •
. '12992 , '-.!-- 49:11, im Blaeser ', ' „ .1.; , < 1 e-rp'reimb'
IC ,
, ,, ,, , • 12993 „ -,"205.49; 4 payroll a/o «'-- ' : ,`:','. '.<r1/25 'deposit ,adj`," , 4
:,,,,--,,,,,
. ,
67
68
-
152,239.26 _ - -.
69
70
71
72
52
53
54
55
56
7
' , G.T. 261,005.90 , ,
. -‚°. , . .-
, . - ...
.. "..
.
73
74
75
Q
0
, C)
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMORANDUM
February 5, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Counqil
City Administra
FROM: Police Chief
SUBJECT: Sale of Surplus Firearms
The following is the tabulation of the bids received for the handguns.
that Council allowed us to sell. The high bidder has not yet claimed
the guns, but said that he would do so sometime this week. The purpose
of this memo is to bring Council up to date on the process. A final
memo with innovative methods of disposing of the funds will follow the
closure of the sale.
AMOUNT BIDDER NOTES
$1,060 OUTPOST HUNTING &. SPORTING
$1,035 STREICHER GUNS CREDIT ONLY
$910 AMERICAN SPORTSMAN
$875 GENE'S GUN REPAIR & SALES ARRIVED LATE
$700 BOSE GUNS & REPAIR ARRIVED LATE
$532 BILLS GUN SHOP
$525 EAST SIDE GUN SHOP
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMORANDUM
February 5, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Counqil
City Administra
FROM: Police Chief
SUBJECT: Sale of Surplus Firearms
The following is the tabulation of the bids received for the handguns.
that Council allowed us to sell. The high bidder has not yet claimed
the guns, but said that he would do so sometime this week. The purpose
of this memo is to bring Council up to date on the process. A final
memo with innovative methods of disposing of the funds will follow the
closure of the sale.
AMOUNT BIDDER NOTES
$1,060 OUTPOST HUNTING &. SPORTING
$1,035 STREICHER GUNS CREDIT ONLY
$910 AMERICAN SPORTSMAN
$875 GENE'S GUN REPAIR & SALES ARRIVED LATE
$700 BOSE GUNS & REPAIR ARRIVED LATE
$532 BILLS GUN SHOP
$525 EAST SIDE GUN SHOP
Jfiapenddllt ScliooC District No./97
Serving West Saint Paul, Mendota Heights, Lilydale, Mendota, Sunfish Lake and portions of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights
1897 Delaware Avenue • West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55118 • (612) 681-2300
January 30, 1991
Tom Lawell
City Administrator
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
Dear Tom,
I will be joining a special delegation of American business and education leaders
traveling to the Soviet Union from February 16 to March 2, 1991. We will be
visiting schools, hospitals, businesses, and cultural and historical points of
interest. We will also participate in meetings and seminars designed to provide a
means for a free exchange of opinions and information related to our respective
approaches to education, school governance, social services and city government,
as well as management strategies for the public and private sector.
The delegation will spend a majority of its time in the city of Pereslavl, and during
this time I will be meeting with the Pereslavl City Council. This would be an
opportune time to present their Council with a formal resolution of friendship and
good will from the Mendota Heights City Council.
Please contact me with the Council's response.
Sincerely,
zy,,,,,,,
Bruce R. Anderson
Superintendent of Schools
BRA/km
Joseph P. Polski, Chair
Kathryn L. Haight, Clerk
Dennis P. Barrett, Treasurer
Bruce R. Anderson, Superintendent of Schools
"WE ARE A MEMBER OF AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMUNITY"
Patrice Bataglia, Director
Robert M. Doffing, Director
James T. Nikolai, Director
Jfiapenddllt ScliooC District No./97
Serving West Saint Paul, Mendota Heights, Lilydale, Mendota, Sunfish Lake and portions of Eagan and Inver Grove Heights
1897 Delaware Avenue • West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55118 • (612) 681-2300
January 30, 1991
Tom Lawell
City Administrator
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
Dear Tom,
I will be joining a special delegation of American business and education leaders
traveling to the Soviet Union from February 16 to March 2, 1991. We will be
visiting schools, hospitals, businesses, and cultural and historical points of
interest. We will also participate in meetings and seminars designed to provide a
means for a free exchange of opinions and information related to our respective
approaches to education, school governance, social services and city government,
as well as management strategies for the public and private sector.
The delegation will spend a majority of its time in the city of Pereslavl, and during
this time I will be meeting with the Pereslavl City Council. This would be an
opportune time to present their Council with a formal resolution of friendship and
good will from the Mendota Heights City Council.
Please contact me with the Council's response.
Sincerely,
zy,,,,,,,
Bruce R. Anderson
Superintendent of Schools
BRA/km
Joseph P. Polski, Chair
Kathryn L. Haight, Clerk
Dennis P. Barrett, Treasurer
Bruce R. Anderson, Superintendent of Schools
"WE ARE A MEMBER OF AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMMUNITY"
Patrice Bataglia, Director
Robert M. Doffing, Director
James T. Nikolai, Director
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION OF FRIENDSHIP AND GOODWILL
TO THE CITY OF PERESLAVL, SOVIET UNION
WHEREAS, representatives of the community of Mendota Heights
have been welcomed as guests in the Soviet Union to exchange ideas,
knowledge and opinions for the betterment of education, social
services and city government; and
WHEREAS, a cooperative relationship is a fundamental element
that promotes better understanding between peoples, strengthens
friendships and promotes peace; and
WHEREAS, the exchange and interaction between cities of
different nations benefits initiatives and efforts to enhance and
promote cooperation among peoples; and
WHEREAS, there is a mutual interest in bonding together in a
spirit of cooperation and exchange to stimulate achievement and
excellence among all the individual sectors that form the civic,
social and economic fabric of cities.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that the City of Mendota
Heights respectfully extends its friendship and goodwill to the
City of Pereslavl, Soviet Union; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in the spirit of friendship the
City of Pereslavl be thanked for its warm welcome as hosts to the
meetings between our nations.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th
day of February, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION OF FRIENDSHIP AND GOODWILL
TO THE CITY OF PERESLAVL, SOVIET UNION
WHEREAS, representatives of the community of Mendota Heights
have been welcomed as guests in the Soviet Union to exchange ideas,
knowledge and opinions for the betterment of education, social
services and city government; and
WHEREAS, a cooperative relationship is a fundamental element
that promotes better understanding between peoples, strengthens
friendships and promotes peace; and
WHEREAS, the exchange and interaction between cities of
different nations benefits initiatives and efforts to enhance and
promote cooperation among peoples; and
WHEREAS, there is a mutual interest in bonding together in a
spirit of cooperation and exchange to stimulate achievement and
excellence among all the individual sectors that form the civic,
social and economic fabric of cities.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of
the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota that the City of Mendota
Heights respectfully extends its friendship and goodwill to the
City of Pereslavl, Soviet Union; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in the spirit of friendship the
City of Pereslavl be thanked for its warm welcome as hosts to the
meetings between our nations.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th
day of February, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direct
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-44: Strub - Subdivision
DISCUSSION
Mr. John Curram, representing Mr. Bill Strub, appeared before
the Planning Commission at their January meeting to present plans
for a preliminary plat that the City Council had required when they
approved Mr. Strub's amendment to his CUP for PUD. Mr. Bill Strub
had been out of town for an extended period of time on business
prior to the Planning Commission meeting and the preliminary plat
document had not been submitted only the architect's site plan.
The Planning Commission continued the hearing to their
February meeting to allow time for the survey drawing to be
submitted for their review.
Staff advertised the Council level public hearing for February
5th. We recommend that City Council continue that hearing, without
any other action, until the March 5, 1991 Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should
pass a motion continuing the hearing until 8:00 o'clock P.M. on
March 5, 1991.
JED/KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Direct
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-44: Strub - Subdivision
DISCUSSION
Mr. John Curram, representing Mr. Bill Strub, appeared before
the Planning Commission at their January meeting to present plans
for a preliminary plat that the City Council had required when they
approved Mr. Strub's amendment to his CUP for PUD. Mr. Bill Strub
had been out of town for an extended period of time on business
prior to the Planning Commission meeting and the preliminary plat
document had not been submitted only the architect's site plan.
The Planning Commission continued the hearing to their
February meeting to allow time for the survey drawing to be
submitted for their review.
Staff advertised the Council level public hearing for February
5th. We recommend that City Council continue that hearing, without
any other action, until the March 5, 1991 Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should
pass a motion continuing the hearing until 8:00 o'clock P.M. on
March 5, 1991.
JED/KLB:kkb
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
Mayor, City Council and City Admin
James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
CASE NO. 91-02: Solvay - Amendment to CUP for PUD
DISCUSSION
Mr. Dale Glowa, representing United Properties, appeared
before the Planning Commission at their January meeting to present
a PUD Amendment to allow Solvay Animal Health, Inc.'s Phase II
construction (see attached staff memos and plans).
At the meeting, Mr. Glowa announced that Solvay is
contemplating increasing the size of the lot by 1 1/2 acres to
allow for a future 12,000 square foot expansion to this facility.
As of this date, Mr. Glowa is still in negotiations with Solvay for
the purchase of this additional property. Review and approval of
any lot line adjustments can be handled during Council approval of
the final plat.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that
City Council approve an Amendment to the CUP for PUD, to allow
Phase II of Solvay Animal Health according to the plans dated
January 9, 1991.
ACTION REOUIRED
Conduct the public hearing and if the Council desires to
implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should
pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 91-_, "A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CUP FOR PUD FOR SOLVAY ANIMAL HEALTH
PHASE II".
Council should also pass a motion authorizing staff to issue
the full building permit.
JED/KLB:kkb
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
Mayor, City Council and City Admin
James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
CASE NO. 91-02: Solvay - Amendment to CUP for PUD
DISCUSSION
Mr. Dale Glowa, representing United Properties, appeared
before the Planning Commission at their January meeting to present
a PUD Amendment to allow Solvay Animal Health, Inc.'s Phase II
construction (see attached staff memos and plans).
At the meeting, Mr. Glowa announced that Solvay is
contemplating increasing the size of the lot by 1 1/2 acres to
allow for a future 12,000 square foot expansion to this facility.
As of this date, Mr. Glowa is still in negotiations with Solvay for
the purchase of this additional property. Review and approval of
any lot line adjustments can be handled during Council approval of
the final plat.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that
City Council approve an Amendment to the CUP for PUD, to allow
Phase II of Solvay Animal Health according to the plans dated
January 9, 1991.
ACTION REOUIRED
Conduct the public hearing and if the Council desires to
implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should
pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 91-_, "A RESOLUTION
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CUP FOR PUD FOR SOLVAY ANIMAL HEALTH
PHASE II".
Council should also pass a motion authorizing staff to issue
the full building permit.
JED/KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
January 17, 1991
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works r,ire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As -
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION
CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties - Solvay -
Amendment to CUP for PUD
Mr. Dale Glowa, representing United Properties, has secured an
agreement from Solvay Animal Health, Inc. to provide a second
building on what is proposed to be an office campus within their
PUD. Because the lot lines and proposed new building were not part
of the original approval, an amendment to the CUP for PUD needs to
appear before the Planning Commission with a public hearing
(Ordinance No. 401, Section 19.10(2)).
Because United Properties' agreement with Solvay provides for
an early occupancy date of September 1, 1991, United Properties has
already appeared before the City Council and has received a
foundation permit. The Council granted the permit with the
condition that United Properties are proceeding at their own risk
and need to process their planning requests through public hearings
at the Planning Commission and City Council (see attached City
Council memo).
There are -several variances being requested as part of the
amendment to the PUD. Variances within a PUD do not have to be
formally enumerated, and in this case the variances requested are
the same parking and sign variances that United Properties
typically receives from the City. They are:
1. Parking space size of 8 1/2 feet (nine is required).
2. Parking ratio of four spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. (five is
required) .
3. Twenty foot (20') sign setback variance.
In addition, they are requesting a side yard setback variance
of eight feet (8') and approval for a covered walkway (crossing the
lot line) and connecting the two buildings. Another part of the
PUD amendment is the definition of new lot lines to accommodate
this building. A preliminary plat has been submitted and is
attached.
ACTION REQUIRED
Conduct the public hearing and make a recommendation to the
City Council on the requested amendments to the CUP for PUD.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
January 17, 1991
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works r,ire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative As -
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION
CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties - Solvay -
Amendment to CUP for PUD
Mr. Dale Glowa, representing United Properties, has secured an
agreement from Solvay Animal Health, Inc. to provide a second
building on what is proposed to be an office campus within their
PUD. Because the lot lines and proposed new building were not part
of the original approval, an amendment to the CUP for PUD needs to
appear before the Planning Commission with a public hearing
(Ordinance No. 401, Section 19.10(2)).
Because United Properties' agreement with Solvay provides for
an early occupancy date of September 1, 1991, United Properties has
already appeared before the City Council and has received a
foundation permit. The Council granted the permit with the
condition that United Properties are proceeding at their own risk
and need to process their planning requests through public hearings
at the Planning Commission and City Council (see attached City
Council memo).
There are -several variances being requested as part of the
amendment to the PUD. Variances within a PUD do not have to be
formally enumerated, and in this case the variances requested are
the same parking and sign variances that United Properties
typically receives from the City. They are:
1. Parking space size of 8 1/2 feet (nine is required).
2. Parking ratio of four spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. (five is
required) .
3. Twenty foot (20') sign setback variance.
In addition, they are requesting a side yard setback variance
of eight feet (8') and approval for a covered walkway (crossing the
lot line) and connecting the two buildings. Another part of the
PUD amendment is the definition of new lot lines to accommodate
this building. A preliminary plat has been submitted and is
attached.
ACTION REQUIRED
Conduct the public hearing and make a recommendation to the
City Council on the requested amendments to the CUP for PUD.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
SOLVAY ANIMAL HEALTH PHASE II
WHEREAS, Solvay Animal Health, Inc. has made application to
amend their Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development to
allow the construction of Phase II, said Phase II consisting of an
additional campus style office warehouse building for the purpose
of biological laboratories; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a
public hearing on January 22, 1991 to consider said application;
and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended
unanimously that City Council approve the requested amendment to
the said CUP for PUD; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights City Council conducted a public
hearing on February 5, 1991 on the requested application.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that said Amendment to the CUP for PUD
would have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the community or surrounding land; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that amendment of the said CUP for PUD
would not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Amendment to CUP for PUD for
construction of Solvay Animal Health, Inc. Phase II be approved as
presented and proposed according to plans dated January 9, 1991
with the condition that the final adjustment for expansion space be
included in the final platting.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th
day of February, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
SOLVAY ANIMAL HEALTH PHASE II
WHEREAS, Solvay Animal Health, Inc. has made application to
amend their Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development to
allow the construction of Phase II, said Phase II consisting of an
additional campus style office warehouse building for the purpose
of biological laboratories; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission conducted a
public hearing on January 22, 1991 to consider said application;
and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights Planning Commission recommended
unanimously that City Council approve the requested amendment to
the said CUP for PUD; and
WHEREAS, the Mendota Heights City Council conducted a public
hearing on February 5, 1991 on the requested application.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights that said Amendment to the CUP for PUD
would have no adverse effect on the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the community or surrounding land; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that amendment of the said CUP for PUD
would not be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Amendment to CUP for PUD for
construction of Solvay Animal Health, Inc. Phase II be approved as
presented and proposed according to plans dated January 9, 1991
with the condition that the final adjustment for expansion space be
included in the final platting.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 5th
day of February, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson, City Clerk
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: 22 January 1991
CASE NUMBER: 91-02
APPLICANT: United Properties
LOCATION: Block 1, Lot 1 Mendota
Heights Business Center
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Amendment to Conditional
Use Permit for PUD, Side
Yard Setback Variance.
1. The applicant wishes to construct an office warehouse
structure to provide expansion space for Solvay Animal
Health Inc. Solvay currently occupies the adjacent
office/warehouse structure located on the Original Lot 1,
Block 1 of the Third Addition of the Mendota Heights
Business Center Subdivision. The applicant is requesting
an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the PUD in
order to further subdivide Lot 2 of this addition to
create two new lots as shown on the Preliminary Plat
drawing provided. This is in accordance with Section
19.10(2) of the Zoning Code. This section of the code
requires an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit when
changes such as the rearrangement of lots are_.. proposed..
In addition to the Conditional Use Permit Amendment, the
applicant is requesting a variance to the side yard
setback requirement to allow a principal structure to be
located within 20 feet of a side yard.
2. The subject property is part of a 13.5 acre Planned Unit
Development that was approved in March of 1989. The area
included in the original approval is bound by Mendota
Heights Road on the north, the Soo Line Railroad ROW on
the east, Northland Drive to the south, and Executive
Drive to the west (see attached location map).
When the original permit application was reviewed, the
applicant presented a Master Site Plan sketch that showed
the intended layout for the entire property including the
area now being considered. A reduced copy of this plan
has been included for your review. As you can see, the
Master Plan showed a building similar to the one proposed
in almost the exact same location as is currently
proposed. While this sketch is intended to be
illustrative, it does indicate an understanding between
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: 22 January 1991
CASE NUMBER: 91-02
APPLICANT: United Properties
LOCATION: Block 1, Lot 1 Mendota
Heights Business Center
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Amendment to Conditional
Use Permit for PUD, Side
Yard Setback Variance.
1. The applicant wishes to construct an office warehouse
structure to provide expansion space for Solvay Animal
Health Inc. Solvay currently occupies the adjacent
office/warehouse structure located on the Original Lot 1,
Block 1 of the Third Addition of the Mendota Heights
Business Center Subdivision. The applicant is requesting
an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit for the PUD in
order to further subdivide Lot 2 of this addition to
create two new lots as shown on the Preliminary Plat
drawing provided. This is in accordance with Section
19.10(2) of the Zoning Code. This section of the code
requires an amendment to the Conditional Use Permit when
changes such as the rearrangement of lots are_.. proposed..
In addition to the Conditional Use Permit Amendment, the
applicant is requesting a variance to the side yard
setback requirement to allow a principal structure to be
located within 20 feet of a side yard.
2. The subject property is part of a 13.5 acre Planned Unit
Development that was approved in March of 1989. The area
included in the original approval is bound by Mendota
Heights Road on the north, the Soo Line Railroad ROW on
the east, Northland Drive to the south, and Executive
Drive to the west (see attached location map).
When the original permit application was reviewed, the
applicant presented a Master Site Plan sketch that showed
the intended layout for the entire property including the
area now being considered. A reduced copy of this plan
has been included for your review. As you can see, the
Master Plan showed a building similar to the one proposed
in almost the exact same location as is currently
proposed. While this sketch is intended to be
illustrative, it does indicate an understanding between
United Properties, Case No. 91-02 Page 2
the applicant and the City regarding the future placement
of structures on the remainder of the property. The
understanding that is implied is that these structures, or
something substantially similar, would be constructed in
later phases as the market permitted. When the final plat
was prepared for Phase I of this development, the property
was divided into to two lots for simplicity sake. One lot
for the building to be constructed in Phase I and one for
the remainder of the site with the understanding that this
large lot would eventually be further divided.
3. The location of the proposed building is substantially
similar to the layout shown on the Master Site Plan. In
addition, the 10 -foot side yard setback variance, which
the applicant is requesting, is consistent with the type
of flexibility in site design that the PUD ordinance is
intended to encourage. In this case, one of the
underlying concepts that the developer was attempting to
achieve with this planned unit development was the
establishment of an office campus environment. There are
several ways to accomplish this. One way is to cluster
buildings closer together in order to promote a more
interrelated feel. This also makes it easier and less
expensive to provide enclosed pedestrian connections,
which further promote the related campus feel. In
addition, creating a campus feel requires unity in the
design and use of exterior materials for all of the
buildings.
4. As mentioned above, the proposed Preliminary Plat shows an
at -grade pedestrian connection between the existing
building and the proposed expansion. -The plan also shows
a service drive in this same location. Dale" Glowa,
representative for United Properties, indicated to staff
that the service drive is shown as an alternative in the
event that the cost of the pedestrian connection is
prohibitive. On-site vehicular circulation, particularly
for large service vehicles, functions somewhat better
without the pedestrian connection since this driveway
offers a nearly 'straight shot back to the service access
entries of both the existing and proposed buildings.
This type of un -circuitous access is really more important
if large semi -tractor trailer trucks visit the site
frequently. According to Mr. Glowa, most of the service
vehicles that deliver supplies to Solvay are smaller van
type trucks, which would have no difficulty maneuvering on
the site. In addition, even if the pedestrian connection
were constructed, there is an access drive off of
Northland Drive that offers a similar direct route back to
the service entries as the one that the pedestrian
connection would be blocking.
United Properties, Case No. 91-02 Page 2
the applicant and the City regarding the future placement
of structures on the remainder of the property. The
understanding that is implied is that these structures, or
something substantially similar, would be constructed in
later phases as the market permitted. When the final plat
was prepared for Phase I of this development, the property
was divided into to two lots for simplicity sake. One lot
for the building to be constructed in Phase I and one for
the remainder of the site with the understanding that this
large lot would eventually be further divided.
3. The location of the proposed building is substantially
similar to the layout shown on the Master Site Plan. In
addition, the 10 -foot side yard setback variance, which
the applicant is requesting, is consistent with the type
of flexibility in site design that the PUD ordinance is
intended to encourage. In this case, one of the
underlying concepts that the developer was attempting to
achieve with this planned unit development was the
establishment of an office campus environment. There are
several ways to accomplish this. One way is to cluster
buildings closer together in order to promote a more
interrelated feel. This also makes it easier and less
expensive to provide enclosed pedestrian connections,
which further promote the related campus feel. In
addition, creating a campus feel requires unity in the
design and use of exterior materials for all of the
buildings.
4. As mentioned above, the proposed Preliminary Plat shows an
at -grade pedestrian connection between the existing
building and the proposed expansion. -The plan also shows
a service drive in this same location. Dale" Glowa,
representative for United Properties, indicated to staff
that the service drive is shown as an alternative in the
event that the cost of the pedestrian connection is
prohibitive. On-site vehicular circulation, particularly
for large service vehicles, functions somewhat better
without the pedestrian connection since this driveway
offers a nearly 'straight shot back to the service access
entries of both the existing and proposed buildings.
This type of un -circuitous access is really more important
if large semi -tractor trailer trucks visit the site
frequently. According to Mr. Glowa, most of the service
vehicles that deliver supplies to Solvay are smaller van
type trucks, which would have no difficulty maneuvering on
the site. In addition, even if the pedestrian connection
were constructed, there is an access drive off of
Northland Drive that offers a similar direct route back to
the service entries as the one that the pedestrian
connection would be blocking.
United Properties, Case No. 91-02 Page 3
5. The resolution approving the original Conditional Use
Permit listed two variances related to parking, which were
intended to be applied to the current proposal. One of
these allows the width of parking stalls to be reduced to
8.5 feet. The parking ratio is also allowed to be reduced
from 5 per 1,000 to 4 per 1,000.
6. The exact area of the proposed building is not indicated
on the Preliminary Plat. However, it measures
approximately 32,700 square feet. When we apply the
4/1,000 parking ratio, we come up with a parking
requirement of 131 stalls. Again, the exact number of
parking stalls provided is not indicated on the drawing,
but by measuring we can determine that the space dedicated
to parking is within one or two stalls of meeting the
requirement. There also appears to be ample space to
accommodate the additional stalls necessary. The exact
figures with respect to building size and number of
parking stalls provided should be clarified prior to final
approval of the Preliminary Plat.
Recommendation
We believe the applicants request is consistent with the
intent of the original PUD as previously approved. The
layout shown on the Preliminary Plat functions well and
appears to meet the requirements listed in the original
PUD approval resolution. In. addition, with. -.the. exception
of the side yard setback variance being requested by the
applicant, the proposed site layout meets all of the other
bulk requirements in the zoning regulations. We believe
the Planning commission should recommend approval of the
applicant's request subject to final approval by the City
Staff of more detailed drawings to include: grading and
drainage plans, exterior elevations, landscape plans, and
other engineering details.
United Properties, Case No. 91-02 Page 3
5. The resolution approving the original Conditional Use
Permit listed two variances related to parking, which were
intended to be applied to the current proposal. One of
these allows the width of parking stalls to be reduced to
8.5 feet. The parking ratio is also allowed to be reduced
from 5 per 1,000 to 4 per 1,000.
6. The exact area of the proposed building is not indicated
on the Preliminary Plat. However, it measures
approximately 32,700 square feet. When we apply the
4/1,000 parking ratio, we come up with a parking
requirement of 131 stalls. Again, the exact number of
parking stalls provided is not indicated on the drawing,
but by measuring we can determine that the space dedicated
to parking is within one or two stalls of meeting the
requirement. There also appears to be ample space to
accommodate the additional stalls necessary. The exact
figures with respect to building size and number of
parking stalls provided should be clarified prior to final
approval of the Preliminary Plat.
Recommendation
We believe the applicants request is consistent with the
intent of the original PUD as previously approved. The
layout shown on the Preliminary Plat functions well and
appears to meet the requirements listed in the original
PUD approval resolution. In. addition, with. -.the. exception
of the side yard setback variance being requested by the
applicant, the proposed site layout meets all of the other
bulk requirements in the zoning regulations. We believe
the Planning commission should recommend approval of the
applicant's request subject to final approval by the City
Staff of more detailed drawings to include: grading and
drainage plans, exterior elevations, landscape plans, and
other engineering details.
Rif-ERG-TATE-
Rif-ERG-TATE-
-
c
N
0
0
0
27.
9c .
roe
u
77h4'4 0'
/.A 3•
Li/ /o
MENDO LIA HEIgHTS .ROAD -
r•
SUBJECT PROPERTY
NORTH t
SCALE V-200'
2
G `
111111
/Zo.3 C
IAC ..1 •
NO THL
3a'
p9 '
rz
-
c
N
0
0
0
27.
9c .
roe
u
77h4'4 0'
/.A 3•
Li/ /o
MENDO LIA HEIgHTS .ROAD -
r•
SUBJECT PROPERTY
NORTH t
SCALE V-200'
2
G `
111111
/Zo.3 C
IAC ..1 •
NO THL
3a'
p9 '
rz
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
LAN 1,1
DI AID
4",‘ MASTER SITE PLAN_
2r.
SALSBURY LABORATORIES INC.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK
DEVELOPER UNITED PROPERTIES
ARCHITECT ROBERT L. BOLAND INC.
'`;
MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD
LAN 1,1
DI AID
4",‘ MASTER SITE PLAN_
2r.
SALSBURY LABORATORIES INC.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK
DEVELOPER UNITED PROPERTIES
ARCHITECT ROBERT L. BOLAND INC.
'`;
City of
Mendota Heights
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. q 1 —02 --
Date
2'
Date of Applica 'on 1/5/
Fee Paid '+ 5 2.52r ]
Applicant Name: <#" • lAvt -I c=am P(ro s PH: o "13 $ Z 1
Address:
(Number & Street)
Owner Name:
(Last)
Address:
(Last) (Firs') OM
3 Coo i U. 50-44, Sfir 6iDo,,,... frl,t.eL S) 43 1
(City) ' (State) (Zip)
'(First) (MI)
(Number & Street)
(City) (State) . (Zip)
Street Location of Property in Question: .S ikike4 o -M- PAT W c% . d E xect„Wv-& pf .
Legal Description of Property: V 1 , LT t ruk-e o h, Bus; cis S C€4
MEP
Type of Request:
/ Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.Dawie,-r9 • Wetlands Permit
Plan Approval Other (attach explanation)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Variance
Applicable City Ordinance Number
4D / Section
Present Zoning of Property P LLI) Present Use V Gt (.6..
Proposed Zoning of Property 1 R D Proposed Use d CR -/ 1 &to / cit 5 -Z
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and opdditional
material are true.
(Signature o
/
71
(Date)
(Received by-f'ritle)
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850
City of
Mendota Heights
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. q 1 —02 --
Date
2'
Date of Applica 'on 1/5/
Fee Paid '+ 5 2.52r ]
Applicant Name: <#" • lAvt -I c=am P(ro s PH: o "13 $ Z 1
Address:
(Number & Street)
Owner Name:
(Last)
Address:
(Last) (Firs') OM
3 Coo i U. 50-44, Sfir 6iDo,,,... frl,t.eL S) 43 1
(City) ' (State) (Zip)
'(First) (MI)
(Number & Street)
(City) (State) . (Zip)
Street Location of Property in Question: .S ikike4 o -M- PAT W c% . d E xect„Wv-& pf .
Legal Description of Property: V 1 , LT t ruk-e o h, Bus; cis S C€4
MEP
Type of Request:
/ Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Approval
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.Dawie,-r9 • Wetlands Permit
Plan Approval Other (attach explanation)
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Variance
Applicable City Ordinance Number
4D / Section
Present Zoning of Property P LLI) Present Use V Gt (.6..
Proposed Zoning of Property 1 R D Proposed Use d CR -/ 1 &to / cit 5 -Z
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and opdditional
material are true.
(Signature o
/
71
(Date)
(Received by-f'ritle)
1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
January 15, 1991
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights will meet at 8:15 o'clock P.M., or as soon as
possible thereafter, on Tuesday, February 5, 1991, in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota,
to consider an application from Mr. Dale Glowa, of United
Properties Development Company, for a Preliminary Plat and an
amendment to a Planned Unit Development for the purpose of
expanding the Solvay Animal Health Facility at the following
described property:
Lots 1 and 2, Mendota Heights Business Center 3rd Addition
More particularly, this property is located at the southeast
corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive Drive.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance
No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the
proposed request will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
January 15, 1991
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights will meet at 8:15 o'clock P.M., or as soon as
possible thereafter, on Tuesday, February 5, 1991, in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota,
to consider an application from Mr. Dale Glowa, of United
Properties Development Company, for a Preliminary Plat and an
amendment to a Planned Unit Development for the purpose of
expanding the Solvay Animal Health Facility at the following
described property:
Lots 1 and 2, Mendota Heights Business Center 3rd Addition
More particularly, this property is located at the southeast
corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive Drive.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance
No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the
proposed request will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
December 31, 1990
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the
City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M., or as soon
as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, January 22, 1991, in the City
Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Dale Glowa, of
United Properties Development Company, for a Preliminary Plat and
an amendment to a Planned Unit Development for the purpose of
expanding the Solvay Animal Health Facility at the following
described property:
Lots 1 and 2, Mendota Heights Business Center 3rd Addition
More particularly, this property is located at the southeast
corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive Drive.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance
No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the
proposed request will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
NOTICE OF HEARING
December 31, 1990
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the
City of Mendota Heights will meet at 8:00 o'clock P.M., or as soon
as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, January 22, 1991, in the City
Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota, to consider an application from Mr. Dale Glowa, of
United Properties Development Company, for a Preliminary Plat and
an amendment to a Planned Unit Development for the purpose of
expanding the Solvay Animal Health Facility at the following
described property:
Lots 1 and 2, Mendota Heights Business Center 3rd Addition
More particularly, this property is located at the southeast
corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive Drive.
This notice is pursuant to City of Mendota Heights Ordinance
No. 401. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the
proposed request will be heard at this meeting.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
FROM: James E. Da
Public Wo
January 10, 1991
and Kevin Batcheld
ctor Administrative
SUBJECT: Solvay Ph II II - Building Permit
INTRODUCTION:
In 1989 United Properties came to an agreement with Solvay Animal
Health, Inc. to construct a new 60,000 square foot corporate head-
quarters and veterinary medicine research company at the intersection
of Northland Drive and Executive Drive. At that time United Proper-
ties processed a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the entire
block that included two lots that were ultimately intended to be a
campus type development. This current proposal is Phase II of that
previously approved Planned Unit Development. Phase I building permit
approval was approved by City Council in advance of any Planning
Commission consideration. United Properties later applied for the
Planned Unit Development and replatting with Planning Commission
review and approval. United Properties has promised a September 1,
1991 occupancy date to Solvay for Phase II and desires to proceed in
the same fashion as was done in Phase I in order to fast track.
DISCUSSION:
Phase II of Solvay is a 30,000 square foot freestanding pharma-
ceutical laboratory that is proposed to match the exterior design of
Phase I (see attached letter and plans). Because of the platting of a
lot and P.U.D. amendments, the United Properties must appear for
public hearings at the January 22, 1991 Planning Commission and the
February 5, 1991 City Council meetings.
United Properties is appearing on tonight's agenda to discuss
foundation and building permit approvals prior to the scheduled public
hearings in order to meet their short deadlines for building occupan-
cy. Variances to parking, sign setback and building setbacks similar
to previous United Properties projects are proposed and will be con-
sidered during the public hearings.
RECOMMENDATION:
Currently the Solvay Planned Unit Development has an existing lot
that is buildable and conforms to all Industrial Zone minimum require-
ments. We recommend that a building permit be authorized this evening
with -future confirmation of the Minor P.U.D. amendment that includes
variances for building setback, parking stall size, parking ration and
sign setback at the February 5th City Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Meet with applicant. If City Council desires to implement the
recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing staff to issue
the building permit. '
JED/KB:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
FROM: James E. Da
Public Wo
January 10, 1991
and Kevin Batcheld
ctor Administrative
SUBJECT: Solvay Ph II II - Building Permit
INTRODUCTION:
In 1989 United Properties came to an agreement with Solvay Animal
Health, Inc. to construct a new 60,000 square foot corporate head-
quarters and veterinary medicine research company at the intersection
of Northland Drive and Executive Drive. At that time United Proper-
ties processed a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the entire
block that included two lots that were ultimately intended to be a
campus type development. This current proposal is Phase II of that
previously approved Planned Unit Development. Phase I building permit
approval was approved by City Council in advance of any Planning
Commission consideration. United Properties later applied for the
Planned Unit Development and replatting with Planning Commission
review and approval. United Properties has promised a September 1,
1991 occupancy date to Solvay for Phase II and desires to proceed in
the same fashion as was done in Phase I in order to fast track.
DISCUSSION:
Phase II of Solvay is a 30,000 square foot freestanding pharma-
ceutical laboratory that is proposed to match the exterior design of
Phase I (see attached letter and plans). Because of the platting of a
lot and P.U.D. amendments, the United Properties must appear for
public hearings at the January 22, 1991 Planning Commission and the
February 5, 1991 City Council meetings.
United Properties is appearing on tonight's agenda to discuss
foundation and building permit approvals prior to the scheduled public
hearings in order to meet their short deadlines for building occupan-
cy. Variances to parking, sign setback and building setbacks similar
to previous United Properties projects are proposed and will be con-
sidered during the public hearings.
RECOMMENDATION:
Currently the Solvay Planned Unit Development has an existing lot
that is buildable and conforms to all Industrial Zone minimum require-
ments. We recommend that a building permit be authorized this evening
with -future confirmation of the Minor P.U.D. amendment that includes
variances for building setback, parking stall size, parking ration and
sign setback at the February 5th City Council meeting.
ACTION REQUIRED:
Meet with applicant. If City Council desires to implement the
recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing staff to issue
the building permit. '
JED/KB:dfw
DEC 19 '90 12:50 UNITED PROPERTIES A
111pRigapT • -7 f.d
404C 1Z 6/ LIM) AC"
k 5
t\ocY-
‘Voj-
-
PAGE.02
Ae(
-4p1/vce
RA 1x LJ (-41/4.A.r
DEC 19 '90 12:50 UNITED PROPERTIES A
111pRigapT • -7 f.d
404C 1Z 6/ LIM) AC"
k 5
t\ocY-
‘Voj-
-
PAGE.02
Ae(
-4p1/vce
RA 1x LJ (-41/4.A.r
UNITED PROPERTIES
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
January 10, 1990
Mr. Thomas Lawell
City Administrator
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Solvay Animal Health, Inc.
Phase II - Pharmaceutical Building
Mendota Heights Business Park
Dear Tom:
United Properties Development Company requests the approval of
the City of Mendota Heights for an amendment of the existing PUD
and a building permit subject to staff's approval of final plans
and specifications for a new pharmaceutical building for Solvay
Animal Health, Inc. in the Mendota Heights Business Park. We
have included 20 reduced copies of the site plan, building
elevation, floor plan and a preliminary landscape concept plan
for the referenced project, and 20 full size copies of the
Preliminary Plat.
The subject will be located on approximately 3.77 acres of land
at the southeast corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive
Drive. The architectural design of this building will include
the same brick and glass materials we used on the adjacent Phase
I building. The building will consist of approximately 30,000
square feet of building area.
Solvay Animal Health, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of
animal vaccines worldwide, chose the Mendota Heights Business
Park for its corporate headquarters location in 1989. The use of
the new building will be a pharmaceutical laboratory, containing
both analytical labs and formulation labs. Small quantities will
be tested and manufactured in this new facility. However,
primary manufacturing will be done off site in manufacturing
facilities like the one they have in Charles City, Iowa.
Hazardous materials are limited to the chemicals used within the
labs which are standard laboratory solutions. The new building
will eventually house approximately 50 employees. Solvay Animal
Health, Inc. is a subsidiary of the Solvay Group, headquartered
in Brussels, Belgium.
3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 (612) 831-1000
UNITED PROPERTIES
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
January 10, 1990
Mr. Thomas Lawell
City Administrator
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Solvay Animal Health, Inc.
Phase II - Pharmaceutical Building
Mendota Heights Business Park
Dear Tom:
United Properties Development Company requests the approval of
the City of Mendota Heights for an amendment of the existing PUD
and a building permit subject to staff's approval of final plans
and specifications for a new pharmaceutical building for Solvay
Animal Health, Inc. in the Mendota Heights Business Park. We
have included 20 reduced copies of the site plan, building
elevation, floor plan and a preliminary landscape concept plan
for the referenced project, and 20 full size copies of the
Preliminary Plat.
The subject will be located on approximately 3.77 acres of land
at the southeast corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive
Drive. The architectural design of this building will include
the same brick and glass materials we used on the adjacent Phase
I building. The building will consist of approximately 30,000
square feet of building area.
Solvay Animal Health, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of
animal vaccines worldwide, chose the Mendota Heights Business
Park for its corporate headquarters location in 1989. The use of
the new building will be a pharmaceutical laboratory, containing
both analytical labs and formulation labs. Small quantities will
be tested and manufactured in this new facility. However,
primary manufacturing will be done off site in manufacturing
facilities like the one they have in Charles City, Iowa.
Hazardous materials are limited to the chemicals used within the
labs which are standard laboratory solutions. The new building
will eventually house approximately 50 employees. Solvay Animal
Health, Inc. is a subsidiary of the Solvay Group, headquartered
in Brussels, Belgium.
3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 (612) 831-1000
Mr. Thomas Lawell
Page 2
January 10, 1990
Time is of an essence for this project which is being developed
on a fast track basis for a September 1 occupancy. On staff's
recommendation, we are applying for a building permit on the
basis of splitting lot 2 of block 1. Once we are underway, we
will immediately follow-up with a PUD amendment to accomodate the
lot split. Additionally, we will request four variances: for
setback; for a 4 per 1,000 square feet of office area parking
ratio for purposes of calculating the number of needed parking
spaces; an 8'6" parking stall width; and a twenty foot tenant
identification signage setback, all of which have been previously
approved by you for the Mendota Heights Business Center,
Southridge Business Center, Northland Insurance Company Building,
Solvay, Big Wheel, and the recently approved Fisery project. Our
desire is for the PUD zoning to allow for common lot lines and
shared parking, site access and circulation.
We respectfully ask your approval of these requests.
Sincerely,
Dale J. G1w
Senior Vice President
DJG/ktb
Mr. Thomas Lawell
Page 2
January 10, 1990
Time is of an essence for this project which is being developed
on a fast track basis for a September 1 occupancy. On staff's
recommendation, we are applying for a building permit on the
basis of splitting lot 2 of block 1. Once we are underway, we
will immediately follow-up with a PUD amendment to accomodate the
lot split. Additionally, we will request four variances: for
setback; for a 4 per 1,000 square feet of office area parking
ratio for purposes of calculating the number of needed parking
spaces; an 8'6" parking stall width; and a twenty foot tenant
identification signage setback, all of which have been previously
approved by you for the Mendota Heights Business Center,
Southridge Business Center, Northland Insurance Company Building,
Solvay, Big Wheel, and the recently approved Fisery project. Our
desire is for the PUD zoning to allow for common lot lines and
shared parking, site access and circulation.
We respectfully ask your approval of these requests.
Sincerely,
Dale J. G1w
Senior Vice President
DJG/ktb
City of
.....�
Mendota Heights
January 28, 1991
Mr. Dale Glowa
United Properties
3500 West 80th Street
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Mr. Glowa:�`��`-�'`"
CUf' Y- t UD
Your application for a L.c %- 5.0%1-
. <<1- will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled.
meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, COD. t� ( . The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
The Planning Commission. recommended U v\a.v1 tw►ovsal :
-�.-� C 4k. { Co y►c 1 ct. C Y.e 1 a or- kr-et ts{.s a 7
uQ ,c-lq.wk,CAS 5 L Q lot e cna-
3D i V 0. 1/41% ,raw \ 1/4,
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
KLB:kkb
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN •.55118,1, 452.1850,
City of
.....�
Mendota Heights
January 28, 1991
Mr. Dale Glowa
United Properties
3500 West 80th Street
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Mr. Glowa:�`��`-�'`"
CUf' Y- t UD
Your application for a L.c %- 5.0%1-
. <<1- will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled.
meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, COD. t� ( . The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
The Planning Commission. recommended U v\a.v1 tw►ovsal :
-�.-� C 4k. { Co y►c 1 ct. C Y.e 1 a or- kr-et ts{.s a 7
uQ ,c-lq.wk,CAS 5 L Q lot e cna-
3D i V 0. 1/41% ,raw \ 1/4,
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
KLB:kkb
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN •.55118,1, 452.1850,
VPrz,
454
January 16, 1991
Mr. Dale Glowa
United Properties
3500 West 80th Street
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Mr, Glowa:
Your application for a
City vf
Mendota
(A tv‘o A (9- vv• -e-,---4
"PO b
(-
will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ;T-0-1. --12_( ((.9(
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 4 2- 50
VPrz,
454
January 16, 1991
Mr. Dale Glowa
United Properties
3500 West 80th Street
Bloomington, MN 55431
Dear Mr, Glowa:
Your application for a
City vf
Mendota
(A tv‘o A (9- vv• -e-,---4
"PO b
(-
will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, ;T-0-1. --12_( ((.9(
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 4 2- 50
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
FROM: James E. Da
Public Wor s
February 5, 1991
and Larry Shaughnessy
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Storm Detentio Pond - Solvay
INTRODUCTION:
During the "super storm" the Mendota Heights Road - Pilot
Knob Road intersection flooded badly enough to inundate the
Printware Building located in the northeast quadrant. Although
the super storm was designated a 6,000 year+ storm event it did
make us aware of the fact that there might be an existing storm
sewer capacity problem within the Industrial Park. Being as
there are still many sites remaining to be developed within the
park, staff has taken the following actions to address the -prob-
lem:
1. We directed Barr Engineering to study the problem in
conjunction with their preparation of the City storm
water plan. They are to give us an analysis of the
situation with suggested solutions. This study should
be completed sometime this summer.
2. We now request that all new developments within the
Industrial Park area include some on-site storage
detention.
DISCUSSION:
During the review of the Solvay Planned Unit Development
Phase I engineering drawings, staff asked United Properties to
include some storm water detention. United Properties' response
was to add a detention pond to be constructed within the later
phases. We feel that having storm water detention on the Solvay
site, which is one of the few remaining very large sites (13
acres) within the Industrial Park, is a very important aspect of
improving the overall storm water problems within the Industrial
Park. There are several ways in which to hold back or retain
water on the site; roof storage, parking lot storage, ditch
storage or pond storage to name a few. United Properties prefers
to use the pond storage alternative and at the same time make it
a positive aspect of the Solvay Campus by designing it as a water
feature, having a fountain and landscaping. The problem that
they are encountering with this solution is that it is a very
expensive solution. Solvay and United Properties feel that the
only way they could make it work would be if the City could share
in the costs, possibly through Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
funding.
1
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
FROM: James E. Da
Public Wor s
February 5, 1991
and Larry Shaughnessy
Finance Director
SUBJECT: Storm Detentio Pond - Solvay
INTRODUCTION:
During the "super storm" the Mendota Heights Road - Pilot
Knob Road intersection flooded badly enough to inundate the
Printware Building located in the northeast quadrant. Although
the super storm was designated a 6,000 year+ storm event it did
make us aware of the fact that there might be an existing storm
sewer capacity problem within the Industrial Park. Being as
there are still many sites remaining to be developed within the
park, staff has taken the following actions to address the -prob-
lem:
1. We directed Barr Engineering to study the problem in
conjunction with their preparation of the City storm
water plan. They are to give us an analysis of the
situation with suggested solutions. This study should
be completed sometime this summer.
2. We now request that all new developments within the
Industrial Park area include some on-site storage
detention.
DISCUSSION:
During the review of the Solvay Planned Unit Development
Phase I engineering drawings, staff asked United Properties to
include some storm water detention. United Properties' response
was to add a detention pond to be constructed within the later
phases. We feel that having storm water detention on the Solvay
site, which is one of the few remaining very large sites (13
acres) within the Industrial Park, is a very important aspect of
improving the overall storm water problems within the Industrial
Park. There are several ways in which to hold back or retain
water on the site; roof storage, parking lot storage, ditch
storage or pond storage to name a few. United Properties prefers
to use the pond storage alternative and at the same time make it
a positive aspect of the Solvay Campus by designing it as a water
feature, having a fountain and landscaping. The problem that
they are encountering with this solution is that it is a very
expensive solution. Solvay and United Properties feel that the
only way they could make it work would be if the City could share
in the costs, possibly through Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
funding.
1
The Solvay site is not within the T.I.F. District bound-
aries, however the flooding problem area is, and in checking with
the City's bonding consultant we have found that assisting them
with the pond could be an eligible T.I.F. cost.
The results of Barr Engineer's City storm water study will
not be available for several months yet, however Engineering
staff has reviewed the options available to assist in reducing
the down stream flooding and we feel that constructing some form
of holding pond on the Solvay site would be desirable. By re-
quiring a pond on the site the City would be adding some addi-
tional development costs on the Developer, so perhaps the City
should participate to some extent in a pond construction project.
United Properties has suggested that the City purchase the
needed ponding easement at a fair price; United Properties'
initial estimate was $100,000 for the purchase of 0.78 acres.
However it seems the City could make do with a smaller parcel for
the pond. An additional 20,000 square feet would be sufficient
(coupled with required platted lot line easements the total would
be 0.5 acres). At the proposed United Properties' rate of $2.94
per square foot, this additional easement would cost approximate-
ly $60,000 if the City were to purchase it.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council discuss the need for a pond
and United Properties request for funding assistance and make a
decision on the expenditure of T.I.F. funds for a pond. If
Council decides to participate with United Properties, we recom-
mend that $60,000 of T.I.F. funds be made available to assist
United Properties in constructing a storm water holding pond
subject to the following conditions:
1. To contain a minimum of 1.5 acre/feet of storage.
2. The pond be included within a platted drainage and
utility easement.
3. The pond be improved by United Properties to contain a
fountain and professionally designed landscaped bor-
ders, the final design to be approved by the City.
4. All future maintenance of the pond be at the
landowner's expense.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they
should pass a motion authorizing the T.I.F. expenditures subject
to the conditions listed within the recommendation.
JED:dfw
2
The Solvay site is not within the T.I.F. District bound-
aries, however the flooding problem area is, and in checking with
the City's bonding consultant we have found that assisting them
with the pond could be an eligible T.I.F. cost.
The results of Barr Engineer's City storm water study will
not be available for several months yet, however Engineering
staff has reviewed the options available to assist in reducing
the down stream flooding and we feel that constructing some form
of holding pond on the Solvay site would be desirable. By re-
quiring a pond on the site the City would be adding some addi-
tional development costs on the Developer, so perhaps the City
should participate to some extent in a pond construction project.
United Properties has suggested that the City purchase the
needed ponding easement at a fair price; United Properties'
initial estimate was $100,000 for the purchase of 0.78 acres.
However it seems the City could make do with a smaller parcel for
the pond. An additional 20,000 square feet would be sufficient
(coupled with required platted lot line easements the total would
be 0.5 acres). At the proposed United Properties' rate of $2.94
per square foot, this additional easement would cost approximate-
ly $60,000 if the City were to purchase it.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that Council discuss the need for a pond
and United Properties request for funding assistance and make a
decision on the expenditure of T.I.F. funds for a pond. If
Council decides to participate with United Properties, we recom-
mend that $60,000 of T.I.F. funds be made available to assist
United Properties in constructing a storm water holding pond
subject to the following conditions:
1. To contain a minimum of 1.5 acre/feet of storage.
2. The pond be included within a platted drainage and
utility easement.
3. The pond be improved by United Properties to contain a
fountain and professionally designed landscaped bor-
ders, the final design to be approved by the City.
4. All future maintenance of the pond be at the
landowner's expense.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they
should pass a motion authorizing the T.I.F. expenditures subject
to the conditions listed within the recommendation.
JED:dfw
2
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass
s
1
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-01: St. Paul Turner's Gymnastic Society -
Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezoning
DISCUSSION
Mr. Larry Page and Mr. Eames Gilmour, of Sirny Architects,
representing St. Paul Turner's Gymnastics Club, appeared before the
Planning Commission at their January meeting. There was not a
preliminary plat prepared by a registered land surveyor available
at the meeting. The Planning Commission directed the applicant to
submit a survey or prepared prelimnary plat and continued their
public hearing until their February meeting to allow time for its
preparation.
Staff had advertised for the City Council hearing on this
matter in advance of the Planning Commission meeting and we
recommend that City Council continue that public hearing until
their March 5th meeting. The Planning Commission recommended that
staff proceed to the Metropolitan Council, with a Minor
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, contingent on City Council approval.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion continuing the public hearing until 8:15
o'clock P.M. on March 5, 1991.
LES/KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass
s
1
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-01: St. Paul Turner's Gymnastic Society -
Minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezoning
DISCUSSION
Mr. Larry Page and Mr. Eames Gilmour, of Sirny Architects,
representing St. Paul Turner's Gymnastics Club, appeared before the
Planning Commission at their January meeting. There was not a
preliminary plat prepared by a registered land surveyor available
at the meeting. The Planning Commission directed the applicant to
submit a survey or prepared prelimnary plat and continued their
public hearing until their February meeting to allow time for its
preparation.
Staff had advertised for the City Council hearing on this
matter in advance of the Planning Commission meeting and we
recommend that City Council continue that public hearing until
their March 5th meeting. The Planning Commission recommended that
staff proceed to the Metropolitan Council, with a Minor
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, contingent on City Council approval.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion continuing the public hearing until 8:15
o'clock P.M. on March 5, 1991.
LES/KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-39: Putnam - Comprehensive Plan Amendment
DISCUSSION
At their November and January meetings, the Planning
Commission conducted public hearings to consider Mr. Putnam's
request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to accommodate a
neighborhood commercial center at a site on the southeast corner of
Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. The Planning Commission closed
the public hearing and voted on a recommendation at their January
meeting.
Mr. Putnam has informed the City he is unavailable to attend
the February 5, 1991 City Council meeting, as he will be out of
town. He has requested that the City Council continue the
scheduled public hearing until the February 19, 1991 City Council
meeting (see attached letter).
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council desires to grant Mr. Putnam's request, they should
pass a motion continuing the public hearing until 8:00 o'clock P.M.
on February 19, 1991.
JED/KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dir
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 90-39: Putnam - Comprehensive Plan Amendment
DISCUSSION
At their November and January meetings, the Planning
Commission conducted public hearings to consider Mr. Putnam's
request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to accommodate a
neighborhood commercial center at a site on the southeast corner of
Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road. The Planning Commission closed
the public hearing and voted on a recommendation at their January
meeting.
Mr. Putnam has informed the City he is unavailable to attend
the February 5, 1991 City Council meeting, as he will be out of
town. He has requested that the City Council continue the
scheduled public hearing until the February 19, 1991 City Council
meeting (see attached letter).
ACTION REOUIRED
If Council desires to grant Mr. Putnam's request, they should
pass a motion continuing the public hearing until 8:00 o'clock P.M.
on February 19, 1991.
JED/KLB:kkb
From : R.A.Putnam & Assoc,Inc Tandem Corp.C612)471-0573 Jan.30.1991 01:30 PM P02
R. A. Putnam and Associates, In
2765 Casco Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota 55991 • OIL & Fax (612) 471 -05 -to
January 30, 1991
Mr, James Danielson
Public Works Director
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Neighborhood Center - Dodd & 1-494
Dear Mr. Danielson;
Please ask the city to postpone consideration of the Comprehensive Guide Plan changes,
from the February 5th meeting to its second meeting in February. I will bc out of town
and cannot attend the February 5th meeting.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
efatota4--_
Dick Putnam
From : R.A.Putnam & Assoc,Inc Tandem Corp.C612)471-0573 Jan.30.1991 01:30 PM P02
R. A. Putnam and Associates, In
2765 Casco Point Road, Wayzata, Minnesota 55991 • OIL & Fax (612) 471 -05 -to
January 30, 1991
Mr, James Danielson
Public Works Director
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Re: Neighborhood Center - Dodd & 1-494
Dear Mr. Danielson;
Please ask the city to postpone consideration of the Comprehensive Guide Plan changes,
from the February 5th meeting to its second meeting in February. I will bc out of town
and cannot attend the February 5th meeting.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
efatota4--_
Dick Putnam
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Di
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-03: Mossman (T. Belvidere's) - Variance
DISCUSSION
At the January Planning Commission meeting, Ms. Bonnie Mossman
appeared to discuss her proposed temporary business sign at 2150
Dodd Road (see attached staff memos).
The Planning Commission had no problems with Ms. Mossman's
request for a temporary business sign, however, they asked her to
explore the possibility of finding a smaller rental sign that would
not exceed the City code of twenty five (25) square feet.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Commission recommended unanimously that City
Council grant the requested temporary sign with a twelve foot (12')
front yard setback variance and a sign area variance of seven (7)
square feet.
ACTION REOUIRED
Meet with the applicant and consider the request for a
temporary sign with accompanying variances.
JED/KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Di
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assis
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-03: Mossman (T. Belvidere's) - Variance
DISCUSSION
At the January Planning Commission meeting, Ms. Bonnie Mossman
appeared to discuss her proposed temporary business sign at 2150
Dodd Road (see attached staff memos).
The Planning Commission had no problems with Ms. Mossman's
request for a temporary business sign, however, they asked her to
explore the possibility of finding a smaller rental sign that would
not exceed the City code of twenty five (25) square feet.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Planning Commission recommended unanimously that City
Council grant the requested temporary sign with a twelve foot (12')
front yard setback variance and a sign area variance of seven (7)
square feet.
ACTION REOUIRED
Meet with the applicant and consider the request for a
temporary sign with accompanying variances.
JED/KLB:kkb
a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
January 17, 1991
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D re
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass'
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-03: T. Belvidere's - Temporary Sign Variance
DISCUSSION
Ms. Bonnie Mossman, owner of T. Belvidere's, 2150 Dodd Road,
desires to install a temporary sign to introduce her business.
City Ordinances provide for the installation of temporary signs for
three (3) months or less and not to exceed twenty-five (25) square
feet of sign area (Ordinance No. 401, Section 18.5(1)).
T. Belvidere's is an existing non -conforming structure that
encroaches upon the front yard setback by twelve feet (12'). In
order to have her temporary sign, the applicant is requesting a
setback variance of twenty-five feet (25') and a sign area variance
of seven (7) square feet.
ACTION REQUIRED
Review the requested variances with the applicant and make a
recommendation to the City Council.
JED/KLB:kkb
a
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
January 17, 1991
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D re
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Ass'
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-03: T. Belvidere's - Temporary Sign Variance
DISCUSSION
Ms. Bonnie Mossman, owner of T. Belvidere's, 2150 Dodd Road,
desires to install a temporary sign to introduce her business.
City Ordinances provide for the installation of temporary signs for
three (3) months or less and not to exceed twenty-five (25) square
feet of sign area (Ordinance No. 401, Section 18.5(1)).
T. Belvidere's is an existing non -conforming structure that
encroaches upon the front yard setback by twelve feet (12'). In
order to have her temporary sign, the applicant is requesting a
setback variance of twenty-five feet (25') and a sign area variance
of seven (7) square feet.
ACTION REQUIRED
Review the requested variances with the applicant and make a
recommendation to the City Council.
JED/KLB:kkb
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: 22 January 1991
CASE NUMBER: 91-03
APPLICANT: Bonnie J. Mossman
LOCATION: 2150 Dodd Road (see
sketch)
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Variance to allow a
temporary sign within a
front yard, Variance to
the maximum allowable
size of a temporary
sign.
1. The applicant operates an interior design business out of
a building on the subject property. The property is
legally nonconforming in several regards. The most
significant, with respect to this application, is that
the building setback from Dodd Road is only 18 feet. As a
result of the building's relationship to the travelled
roadway, the signage on this building is difficult to
read.
2. The existing signage consists of fairly large cutout type
lettering, which is attached to_the_front of the building.
There are several factors at work here that reduce the
effectiveness of the existing signage. The first is that
because the building is so close to the traveled roadway,
the angle at which it is viewed is very shallow. This
makes the letters appear to blend together until a -passing
motorist is almost directly in front of the building. It
seems contrary, but having a building set back from the
road actually has some advantages for reading signage.
The second factor is that at the speed of traffic along
Dodd Road, the time which a vehicle is actually in front
of the subject property is very brief. Finally, there is
a building on the north side of the subject property that
obstructs the view of the front of the subject building
for travelers headed south on Dodd Road. The applicant is
considering options to resolve the signage problem for the
long term, but in the interim she wishes to install a
temporary sign in the parking lot in front of the building
to help make people aware of her location. I have
personally driven past this location several times and had
never noticed the applicant's business signage.
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: 22 January 1991
CASE NUMBER: 91-03
APPLICANT: Bonnie J. Mossman
LOCATION: 2150 Dodd Road (see
sketch)
ACTION REQUESTED:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
Variance to allow a
temporary sign within a
front yard, Variance to
the maximum allowable
size of a temporary
sign.
1. The applicant operates an interior design business out of
a building on the subject property. The property is
legally nonconforming in several regards. The most
significant, with respect to this application, is that
the building setback from Dodd Road is only 18 feet. As a
result of the building's relationship to the travelled
roadway, the signage on this building is difficult to
read.
2. The existing signage consists of fairly large cutout type
lettering, which is attached to_the_front of the building.
There are several factors at work here that reduce the
effectiveness of the existing signage. The first is that
because the building is so close to the traveled roadway,
the angle at which it is viewed is very shallow. This
makes the letters appear to blend together until a -passing
motorist is almost directly in front of the building. It
seems contrary, but having a building set back from the
road actually has some advantages for reading signage.
The second factor is that at the speed of traffic along
Dodd Road, the time which a vehicle is actually in front
of the subject property is very brief. Finally, there is
a building on the north side of the subject property that
obstructs the view of the front of the subject building
for travelers headed south on Dodd Road. The applicant is
considering options to resolve the signage problem for the
long term, but in the interim she wishes to install a
temporary sign in the parking lot in front of the building
to help make people aware of her location. I have
personally driven past this location several times and had
never noticed the applicant's business signage.
Bonnie J. Mossman, Case No. 91-03 Page 2
3. The applicant proposes to temporarily locate a portable
sign in the front parking lot of the property. Section
18.5(11) of the Zoning Ordinance permits temporary signs
on any zoning lot for a 'period not to exceed three
months. Due to the substandard building setback, this
sign would be located within the front yard and would
require a variance to the front yard setback requirement.
The location of the sign would appear to be approximately
3 feet from the front lot line based on the applicant's
sketch. We would recommend that the sign be pulled back a
minimum of 2 feet to reduce the possibility of the sign
being damaged during snow removal.
4. The applicant's sketch also indicates that the proposed
sign would be 32 square feet in surface area. Section
18.5(11) limits the size of temporary signage to 25 square
feet. The applicant should be encouraged to rent a
smaller sign if possible. If this is the minimum size of
a portable sign available or if the Commission determines
that this size is reasonable, a variance would be required
to allow the 32 square foot sign.
Bonnie J. Mossman, Case No. 91-03 Page 2
3. The applicant proposes to temporarily locate a portable
sign in the front parking lot of the property. Section
18.5(11) of the Zoning Ordinance permits temporary signs
on any zoning lot for a 'period not to exceed three
months. Due to the substandard building setback, this
sign would be located within the front yard and would
require a variance to the front yard setback requirement.
The location of the sign would appear to be approximately
3 feet from the front lot line based on the applicant's
sketch. We would recommend that the sign be pulled back a
minimum of 2 feet to reduce the possibility of the sign
being damaged during snow removal.
4. The applicant's sketch also indicates that the proposed
sign would be 32 square feet in surface area. Section
18.5(11) limits the size of temporary signage to 25 square
feet. The applicant should be encouraged to rent a
smaller sign if possible. If this is the minimum size of
a portable sign available or if the Commission determines
that this size is reasonable, a variance would be required
to allow the 32 square foot sign.
N
IDCD
N. 89° 41.45" W.
920.23
N
N)
0
ID
0 9zAc.11b 050-50
040-50
100 24o
/" ID -AMERICA
o BANCORPORATIOAI
2605P B
040.5!
147. 3G
114.4Q
h
1
SUBJECT PROPERTY
a
NORTH T
SCALE 1H=200'
Har ry::
4.
EJ-zrne t.t
tk.' 3
1 Kr►�kher
26054-A 4 •4
050-5e h \ .S
YL_13
IID
.10
2-•
1J392
5' B a
J $ �
110 Ile /04 2.3
h HOKA1-1 AVE.
20 4 11
aSr
a
4
N
IDCD
N. 89° 41.45" W.
920.23
N
N)
0
ID
0 9zAc.11b 050-50
040-50
100 24o
/" ID -AMERICA
o BANCORPORATIOAI
2605P B
040.5!
147. 3G
114.4Q
h
1
SUBJECT PROPERTY
a
NORTH T
SCALE 1H=200'
Har ry::
4.
EJ-zrne t.t
tk.' 3
1 Kr►�kher
26054-A 4 •4
050-5e h \ .S
YL_13
IID
.10
2-•
1J392
5' B a
J $ �
110 Ile /04 2.3
h HOKA1-1 AVE.
20 4 11
aSr
a
4
ie.rnir
111111
16 mil immenniiiiiihilim
raw no
am.
INN.v .
'MUNI lid 1110
1J t
\.
110
SUBJECT PROPERTY
NORTH t
SCALE 1"=800'
N
O
__ POWER CO.
IA. ...
.....,„„
ise.w.,..
,........
,______...:,,,,..„,...... • 4)/a .
1i 1111111111111111111M 10.'l°yo,�.w,,.�:
�ee:�eeneeeeeeee► Jr* � ,
Y MARSH
•
PARC
at VIII*
QnBPOd4E
• / WELL.
sf /
l\
ie.rnir
111111
16 mil immenniiiiiihilim
raw no
am.
INN.v .
'MUNI lid 1110
1J t
\.
110
SUBJECT PROPERTY
NORTH t
SCALE 1"=800'
N
O
__ POWER CO.
IA. ...
.....,„„
ise.w.,..
,........
,______...:,,,,..„,...... • 4)/a .
1i 1111111111111111111M 10.'l°yo,�.w,,.�:
�ee:�eeneeeeeeee► Jr* � ,
Y MARSH
•
PARC
at VIII*
QnBPOd4E
• / WELL.
sf /
l\
T. BELVIDERE'S INC.
Total Look in Interiors
2150 Dodd Road • Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 • (612) 452-6110
• 6);-.6‘...ezeLP
✓nom ..�.� �J �J Z/L,4‹./
�, z'�� •�o�zv 4_.GA—e2
L.44_LJ ` �-�
T. BELVIDERE'S INC.
Total Look in Interiors
2150 Dodd Road • Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 • (612) 452-6110
• 6);-.6‘...ezeLP
✓nom ..�.� �J �J Z/L,4‹./
�, z'�� •�o�zv 4_.GA—e2
L.44_LJ ` �-�
• City of
Mendota Heights
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No.
Date of Application /-_-(/-_,19-1
Fee Paid ./g
Applicant Name:
(Last)
PH:
(First) (Mi)
Address: c'F/S3L d 1,17I/e;e1/e, 4A g/711 .C.;57...2 el
(Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) •
Owner Name:
(Las )
Address:
(Number & Street) (City) (State)
Street Location of Property in Question:r-ild,907e
(Zip)
Legal Description ofProperty:
Type of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
PlanApproval
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
XVariance
Subdivision Approval
Wetlands Permit
Other (attach explanation)
Applicable City Ordinance Number 1° 1 Section i g. (t1)
Present Zoning of Property Present Use
Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and
material are true.
the additional
(Si
e of Applicant)
//—
(Date)
(Received by - Title)
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452.1850
• City of
Mendota Heights
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No.
Date of Application /-_-(/-_,19-1
Fee Paid ./g
Applicant Name:
(Last)
PH:
(First) (Mi)
Address: c'F/S3L d 1,17I/e;e1/e, 4A g/711 .C.;57...2 el
(Number & Street) (City) (State) (Zip) •
Owner Name:
(Las )
Address:
(Number & Street) (City) (State)
Street Location of Property in Question:r-ild,907e
(Zip)
Legal Description ofProperty:
Type of Request:
Rezoning
Conditional Use Permit
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D.
PlanApproval
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
XVariance
Subdivision Approval
Wetlands Permit
Other (attach explanation)
Applicable City Ordinance Number 1° 1 Section i g. (t1)
Present Zoning of Property Present Use
Proposed Zoning of Property Proposed Use
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and
material are true.
the additional
(Si
e of Applicant)
//—
(Date)
(Received by - Title)
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452.1850
T. BELVIDERE'S INC.
Total Look in Interiors
2150 Dodd Road • Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 • (612) 452-6110
v.° yvaz,/.?r,teizz4J
L1,712 va4A-/7 470 .a.24)0GZ-Ly
az-f2t} 4/2(F, z__ele_z
fr/7_.,
-ae_1/4)7to, a/t2c2
7/170-0--e
T. BELVIDERE'S INC.
Total Look in Interiors
2150 Dodd Road • Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 • (612) 452-6110
v.° yvaz,/.?r,teizz4J
L1,712 va4A-/7 470 .a.24)0GZ-Ly
az-f2t} 4/2(F, z__ele_z
fr/7_.,
-ae_1/4)7to, a/t2c2
7/170-0--e
T. BELVIDERE'S INC.
Total Look in Interiors
2150 Dodd Road • Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 • (612) 452-6110
6irE J°1/9/v
•
A
PNb/L r 18
,
311N Ct11LL �fe
T 3ELv/c/ELfe' s
CusTaf2 s0ir�D2ar/2)6-
fir Liwi r "Ark es
/D
-r
T. BELVIDERE'S INC.
Total Look in Interiors
2150 Dodd Road • Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120 • (612) 452-6110
6irE J°1/9/v
•
A
PNb/L r 18
,
311N Ct11LL �fe
T 3ELv/c/ELfe' s
CusTaf2 s0ir�D2ar/2)6-
fir Liwi r "Ark es
/D
-r
City of
PalA A A A Mendota Heights
January 28, 1991
Ms. Bonnie J. Mossman
2150 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Mossman:
,r
Your application for a kavieot'o-CLI will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled
meeting, which will beheld on Tuesday, FAD S:, (qqi . The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
The Planning Commission recommended
"04- 4-t CvLc(
qrb \ r- 4-9.‘resi (crrrA-r-4,1 5
&It
Vo.dC1cA.vgaz,.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452.1850
City of
PalA A A A Mendota Heights
January 28, 1991
Ms. Bonnie J. Mossman
2150 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Mossman:
,r
Your application for a kavieot'o-CLI will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled
meeting, which will beheld on Tuesday, FAD S:, (qqi . The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
The Planning Commission recommended
"04- 4-t CvLc(
qrb \ r- 4-9.‘resi (crrrA-r-4,1 5
&It
Vo.dC1cA.vgaz,.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452.1850
January 16, 1991
Ms. Bonnie J. Mossman
2150 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Mossman:
Cityof
endota Heihts
Your application for a 5(c v, UCtv-l0.V\will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, cJcth - 21 qf l
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30.o'clock P.M., here
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850
January 16, 1991
Ms. Bonnie J. Mossman
2150 Dodd Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. Mossman:
Cityof
endota Heihts
Your application for a 5(c v, UCtv-l0.V\will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, cJcth - 21 qf l
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30.o'clock P.M., here
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Variance
DISCUSSION
Mr. John Bellows, attorney representing Ms. Sylvia Pentel, 556
Fremont Avenue, appeared before the January Planning Commission to
request a thirty seven foot (37') height variance. The variance
requested is to allow the construction of a sixty eight foot (68')
high ham radio antenna (see attached staff and planner memos).
Prior to the meeting staff had received numerous contacts from
Ms. Pentel's neighbors in opposition to the request. Many of her
neighbors were in attendance at the meeting to voice their
objections directly to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Bellows argued that FCC regulations provide for preemption
of local ordinances to allow for reasonably reliable amateur radio
communications, and in the case of ham radios that requires an
antenna at least sixty feet (60') to seventy feet (70') high. He
reminded the Planning Commission that the City had previously
granted a variance to allow a similar antenna at 975 Delaware
Avenue.
The Planning Commission expressed numerous concerns at the
meeting regarding the proposed tower including questions of safety
and protection of neighboring houses, interference with nearby
radio and television reception and child safety. In addition
certain members of the Planning Commission had contacted the
neighbors and discovered there was confusion over what was being
proposed versus what they had signed off of on the applicant's
petition.
The applicant has submitted numerous technical reports and
documents regarding ham radio operation and tower construction.
Because of the volume of this material, it is not being reproduced
to be included in your packet. This material is available for
review at City Hall should you desire to review it.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 30, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
SUBJECT: CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Variance
DISCUSSION
Mr. John Bellows, attorney representing Ms. Sylvia Pentel, 556
Fremont Avenue, appeared before the January Planning Commission to
request a thirty seven foot (37') height variance. The variance
requested is to allow the construction of a sixty eight foot (68')
high ham radio antenna (see attached staff and planner memos).
Prior to the meeting staff had received numerous contacts from
Ms. Pentel's neighbors in opposition to the request. Many of her
neighbors were in attendance at the meeting to voice their
objections directly to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Bellows argued that FCC regulations provide for preemption
of local ordinances to allow for reasonably reliable amateur radio
communications, and in the case of ham radios that requires an
antenna at least sixty feet (60') to seventy feet (70') high. He
reminded the Planning Commission that the City had previously
granted a variance to allow a similar antenna at 975 Delaware
Avenue.
The Planning Commission expressed numerous concerns at the
meeting regarding the proposed tower including questions of safety
and protection of neighboring houses, interference with nearby
radio and television reception and child safety. In addition
certain members of the Planning Commission had contacted the
neighbors and discovered there was confusion over what was being
proposed versus what they had signed off of on the applicant's
petition.
The applicant has submitted numerous technical reports and
documents regarding ham radio operation and tower construction.
Because of the volume of this material, it is not being reproduced
to be included in your packet. This material is available for
review at City Hall should you desire to review it.
In addition, Mr. Bellows has submitted some court case
citations (see attached letter). A copy of this letter has been
forwarded to City Attorney Tom Hart for his review. Staff has also
received additional letters of objection from neighbors that are
also attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the applicant not submitting adequate proof of
hardship (Ordinance No. 401, Section 5.5(1) and 5.5(4)) the
Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City
Council deny the requested variance.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant, and if the City Council desires to
implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should
pass a motion denying the requested thirty seven foot (37') height
variance and directing staff to prepare appropriate resolution for
the Mayor's signature.
JED/KLB:kkb
In addition, Mr. Bellows has submitted some court case
citations (see attached letter). A copy of this letter has been
forwarded to City Attorney Tom Hart for his review. Staff has also
received additional letters of objection from neighbors that are
also attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the applicant not submitting adequate proof of
hardship (Ordinance No. 401, Section 5.5(1) and 5.5(4)) the
Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City
Council deny the requested variance.
ACTION REQUIRED
Meet with the applicant, and if the City Council desires to
implement the Planning Commission's recommendation, they should
pass a motion denying the requested thirty seven foot (37') height
variance and directing staff to prepare appropriate resolution for
the Mayor's signature.
JED/KLB:kkb
•
City of
Mendota Heights
January 30, 1991
Mr. John B. Bellows
Roedler and Bellows
1075 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
Dear Mr. Bellows:
I am writing to you to acknowledge receipt of the citations that
you have sent to the City, based upon your testimony at the
Planning Commission. The citations have been forwarded to our City
Attorney, thank you for forwarding them to us.
Ms. Pentel's requested height variance for her proposed radio tower
will appear on the February 5, 1991 City Council agenda. The City
Council meeting begins at 7:30 P.M. that evening.
Should you or Ms. Pentel wish to see any information contained in
the Planning Case File, please be advised that any and all
information is available here at City Hall during normal business
hours.
Should you have any questions or concerns, I may be contacted at
452-1850.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452-1850
•
City of
Mendota Heights
January 30, 1991
Mr. John B. Bellows
Roedler and Bellows
1075 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
Dear Mr. Bellows:
I am writing to you to acknowledge receipt of the citations that
you have sent to the City, based upon your testimony at the
Planning Commission. The citations have been forwarded to our City
Attorney, thank you for forwarding them to us.
Ms. Pentel's requested height variance for her proposed radio tower
will appear on the February 5, 1991 City Council agenda. The City
Council meeting begins at 7:30 P.M. that evening.
Should you or Ms. Pentel wish to see any information contained in
the Planning Case File, please be advised that any and all
information is available here at City Hall during normal business
hours.
Should you have any questions or concerns, I may be contacted at
452-1850.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452-1850
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
RADIO TOWER REQUEST
Page No. 2188
October 6, 1987
project. He stated that in response to
concerns of residents at the last Council
discussion on the matter, an evergreen hedge
of four to six foot arborvitae has been
substituted for the maple hedge shown on the
original plan, and that the arborvitae will
extend all the way along the west curbline of
the proposed parking lot. He also pointed out
that a berm will be added east of the existing
trees, from the existing single family
structure (former Mulvihill home) to the north
property line.
Ms. Carol Adams, a resident who had expressed
concern over screen at prior discussions on
the matter, stated that she feels the revised
plan provides a good solution.
Councilmember Hartmann movedadoption of
Resolution No. 87-100, "RESOLUTION APPROVING
FINAL PLAT FOR BETH JACOB SYNAGOGUE."
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Mr. Joseph Koppi, 975 Delaware Avenue, and Mr.
John Bellows were present to request
authorization to erect an adjustable height,
telescoping mast radio tower at his residence.
Mr. Koppi stated that the tower is a self-
supporting system, free standing, and would be
located about three feet from the house.
Councilmember Hartmann informed Mr. Koppi that
the City is in the process of reviewing and
recodifying its ordinances and that ordinance
language adressing ham radio towers should
perhaps be included. He asked Mr. Koppi if
the tower can be lowered easily during storms.
Mr. Koppi responded that it can, and that in
fact the tower would probably be in its
lowered position most of the time.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the request
presents a problem because there are no City
regulations which address radio towers. He
also informed Mr. Koppi of a similar request
which was turned down in the past, and
explained that there were neighborhood
objections to that request based on concerns
over the potential that the tower might act as
a lightning rod and might cause intereference
with television reception in the neighborhood.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
RADIO TOWER REQUEST
Page No. 2188
October 6, 1987
project. He stated that in response to
concerns of residents at the last Council
discussion on the matter, an evergreen hedge
of four to six foot arborvitae has been
substituted for the maple hedge shown on the
original plan, and that the arborvitae will
extend all the way along the west curbline of
the proposed parking lot. He also pointed out
that a berm will be added east of the existing
trees, from the existing single family
structure (former Mulvihill home) to the north
property line.
Ms. Carol Adams, a resident who had expressed
concern over screen at prior discussions on
the matter, stated that she feels the revised
plan provides a good solution.
Councilmember Hartmann movedadoption of
Resolution No. 87-100, "RESOLUTION APPROVING
FINAL PLAT FOR BETH JACOB SYNAGOGUE."
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Mr. Joseph Koppi, 975 Delaware Avenue, and Mr.
John Bellows were present to request
authorization to erect an adjustable height,
telescoping mast radio tower at his residence.
Mr. Koppi stated that the tower is a self-
supporting system, free standing, and would be
located about three feet from the house.
Councilmember Hartmann informed Mr. Koppi that
the City is in the process of reviewing and
recodifying its ordinances and that ordinance
language adressing ham radio towers should
perhaps be included. He asked Mr. Koppi if
the tower can be lowered easily during storms.
Mr. Koppi responded that it can, and that in
fact the tower would probably be in its
lowered position most of the time.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that the request
presents a problem because there are no City
regulations which address radio towers. He
also informed Mr. Koppi of a similar request
which was turned down in the past, and
explained that there were neighborhood
objections to that request based on concerns
over the potential that the tower might act as
a lightning rod and might cause intereference
with television reception in the neighborhood.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
1987 LEVY
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Page No. 2189
October 6, 1987
Mr. Bellows stated that he is not prepared to
speak to the issue of whether such a tower
might have the potential of being a lightning
rod, but that any engineer would tell Council
that the taller the antenna, the less likely
it would be that television interference would
be caused. He cited provisions of an FCC
order relating to a limited preemption of
local regulations and the results of a recent
court case. Mr. Bellows that Mr. Koppi's
neighbors do not seem to object to the request
and pointed out that the structure has no guy
wires or truss structures. He stated that it
seemed to him that if there are no regulations
to prohibit the request it should be approved.
He also offered to provide sample ordinances
relating to ham radio towers. He stated that
the height of the tower itself is 24 feet and
that it cranks up to 60 feet..
After additional discussion, Councilmember
Cummins moved to grant a variance for the
antenna, to permit construction of the
structure on the condition that when it is not
in use, the operator will nest it.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
The Council acknowledged and discussed a
report from the City Administrator regarding
the proposed 1987 levy and firefighter
compensation.
After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved
adoption of Resolution No. 87-101, "RESOLUTION
APPROVING 1987 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1988."
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to create a
firefighter's compensation review committee
and to appoint Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmember Cummins, Administrator Frazell,
Treasurer Shaughnessy, Fire Chief Maczko, and
Firefighters Kilburg, Adrian, Lappako and
Leroy Noack to serve on the committee.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
LEXINGTON HEIGHTS Council acknowledged final plans and speci-
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
1987 LEVY
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Page No. 2189
October 6, 1987
Mr. Bellows stated that he is not prepared to
speak to the issue of whether such a tower
might have the potential of being a lightning
rod, but that any engineer would tell Council
that the taller the antenna, the less likely
it would be that television interference would
be caused. He cited provisions of an FCC
order relating to a limited preemption of
local regulations and the results of a recent
court case. Mr. Bellows that Mr. Koppi's
neighbors do not seem to object to the request
and pointed out that the structure has no guy
wires or truss structures. He stated that it
seemed to him that if there are no regulations
to prohibit the request it should be approved.
He also offered to provide sample ordinances
relating to ham radio towers. He stated that
the height of the tower itself is 24 feet and
that it cranks up to 60 feet..
After additional discussion, Councilmember
Cummins moved to grant a variance for the
antenna, to permit construction of the
structure on the condition that when it is not
in use, the operator will nest it.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
The Council acknowledged and discussed a
report from the City Administrator regarding
the proposed 1987 levy and firefighter
compensation.
After discussion, Councilmember Cummins moved
adoption of Resolution No. 87-101, "RESOLUTION
APPROVING 1987 LEVY COLLECTIBLE IN 1988."
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to create a
firefighter's compensation review committee
and to appoint Mayor Mertensotto,
Councilmember Cummins, Administrator Frazell,
Treasurer Shaughnessy, Fire Chief Maczko, and
Firefighters Kilburg, Adrian, Lappako and
Leroy Noack to serve on the committee.
Councilmember Witt seconded the motion.
LEXINGTON HEIGHTS Council acknowledged final plans and speci-
1
ROEDLER & BELLOWS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
GEORGE R. ROEDLER, JR.
JOHN B. BELLOWS, JR.
1075 LANDMARK TOWERS
345 ST. PETER STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
(612) 291-8015
January 24, 1991
Mr Kevin L. Batcheldor
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Planning Commission
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batcheldor:
As requested by the Planning Commission, I am forwarding
to you, citations as to six cases in which the provisions
of FCC PRB-1 have been interpreted as it applies to local
zoning ordinances. The citations are as follows:
1) Thernes v City of Lakeside Park, et al, 779F 2nd
1187 (6 Cir 1987);
2) Bodony v Village of Sands Point, et al, 681 Fed Supp
1009 Eastern District of NY;
3) Bulchis v City of Edmonds, 671 Fed Supp 1270 (WD
Wash 11987);
4) Izzo v Borough of River Edge, et al, 843 F 2nd 765
(3rd Cir 1988);
5) Macmillan v City of Rocky River, et al, 1:87 CV 2820
Easter Division Northern District of Ohio, decided
November 3, 1990;
6) Evans v Board of County Commissions, 90-F-1150 (US
District Court Colorado, decided November 13, 1990).
I hope the above citations will be of assistance in this
matter.
I was disturbed to note that at no'time has Ms. Pentel
been advised of the complaints raised by neighbors
1
ROEDLER & BELLOWS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
GEORGE R. ROEDLER, JR.
JOHN B. BELLOWS, JR.
1075 LANDMARK TOWERS
345 ST. PETER STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
(612) 291-8015
January 24, 1991
Mr Kevin L. Batcheldor
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Planning Commission
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batcheldor:
As requested by the Planning Commission, I am forwarding
to you, citations as to six cases in which the provisions
of FCC PRB-1 have been interpreted as it applies to local
zoning ordinances. The citations are as follows:
1) Thernes v City of Lakeside Park, et al, 779F 2nd
1187 (6 Cir 1987);
2) Bodony v Village of Sands Point, et al, 681 Fed Supp
1009 Eastern District of NY;
3) Bulchis v City of Edmonds, 671 Fed Supp 1270 (WD
Wash 11987);
4) Izzo v Borough of River Edge, et al, 843 F 2nd 765
(3rd Cir 1988);
5) Macmillan v City of Rocky River, et al, 1:87 CV 2820
Easter Division Northern District of Ohio, decided
November 3, 1990;
6) Evans v Board of County Commissions, 90-F-1150 (US
District Court Colorado, decided November 13, 1990).
I hope the above citations will be of assistance in this
matter.
I was disturbed to note that at no'time has Ms. Pentel
been advised of the complaints raised by neighbors
Letter to: Kevin L. Batcheldor
Dated: January 24, 1991
Page No. 2
regarding this proposed variance. She was neither advised
of the existence of such complaints, nor given access to
the letters submitted by neighbors. This is particularly
disturbing since it was apparent from the comments made
during the course of the hearing that members of staff and
the Commission have discussed this matter with objecting
neighbors prior=to the hearing.
Please be advised that should
questions regarding technical
or for that matter any aspect
be more than happy to attempt
such questions.
Yours truly,
ROEDLER & BELLOWS
fl
the staff have further
aspects of this application,
of the application, I would
to obtain answers to any
Letter to: Kevin L. Batcheldor
Dated: January 24, 1991
Page No. 2
regarding this proposed variance. She was neither advised
of the existence of such complaints, nor given access to
the letters submitted by neighbors. This is particularly
disturbing since it was apparent from the comments made
during the course of the hearing that members of staff and
the Commission have discussed this matter with objecting
neighbors prior=to the hearing.
Please be advised that should
questions regarding technical
or for that matter any aspect
be more than happy to attempt
such questions.
Yours truly,
ROEDLER & BELLOWS
fl
the staff have further
aspects of this application,
of the application, I would
to obtain answers to any
CPA
tHbo(le-e-- -61 &iae5e.
i1,t4
ilol V1C1DeaCurK,
Hand.e+k- -4-ts m
1----z5-(-1 1 .K,
, , iggt
r
„o- /iJtk_ ev-wr 4 cbtuo
l 'cam- d 0-e4 s6 -4-7,1,e/414.071__ /24,e,t
4'41 Act. J C � (9-t . ,.,:?..4(44,6
r ��
�ere.c i� �► �8 T crot- Q1c�N 15 k -e
GO)We, 4
. .ct,d_
A / ,44161, 01044can 4'i d&% ..e._
Y44/ee- o4 -V . OfCL 2 `c'-- , .....
10-c - . a ;ems Q . a.
�tiir e.
6e0M dl -&7
CPA
tHbo(le-e-- -61 &iae5e.
i1,t4
ilol V1C1DeaCurK,
Hand.e+k- -4-ts m
1----z5-(-1 1 .K,
, , iggt
r
„o- /iJtk_ ev-wr 4 cbtuo
l 'cam- d 0-e4 s6 -4-7,1,e/414.071__ /24,e,t
4'41 Act. J C � (9-t . ,.,:?..4(44,6
r ��
�ere.c i� �► �8 T crot- Q1c�N 15 k -e
GO)We, 4
. .ct,d_
A / ,44161, 01044can 4'i d&% ..e._
Y44/ee- o4 -V . OfCL 2 `c'-- , .....
10-c - . a ;ems Q . a.
�tiir e.
6e0M dl -&7
-;>71V 7--
(5
•
"rrA4.. 25-2-/ (4.2
Z' )3i2-'
7317z 77
7.79,9 7.".--2
0-7
•
1047 j_s5
-3fr."
67: 677'"
.221 2 ),-2"-A-3
2_777/: —17/7"--
:7-
77 .77_7
72V -77-/v/
t01;•'Lt.!4PF:iti§!szff(ti
-;>71V 7--
(5
•
"rrA4.. 25-2-/ (4.2
Z' )3i2-'
7317z 77
7.79,9 7.".--2
0-7
•
1047 j_s5
-3fr."
67: 677'"
.221 2 ),-2"-A-3
2_777/: —17/7"--
:7-
77 .77_7
72V -77-/v/
t01;•'Lt.!4PF:iti§!szff(ti
- q2 -Z I
C 4'zi 2-7
(\-
-
41
e
(.5-6-- ,s,
St
.44
4,
•40
94
44
- q2 -Z I
C 4'zi 2-7
(\-
-
41
e
(.5-6-- ,s,
St
.44
4,
•40
94
44
e LizaLtfi gpLuinnzzt
605 gwzden. _Can
<A/kw:Iota (:)-1 • fiL, Sliinn&d.ota 5 5118
Qaca-ulLaQ
/Ws
44., 441IJ
zfiez
ez„-mi
e LizaLtfi gpLuinnzzt
605 gwzden. _Can
<A/kw:Iota (:)-1 • fiL, Sliinn&d.ota 5 5118
Qaca-ulLaQ
/Ws
44., 441IJ
zfiez
ez„-mi
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
January 17, 1991
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION
CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Antenna Height Variance
Ms. Sylvia Pentel, 556 Fremont Avenue, desires to construct a
sixty-two foot (62') high Ham Radio Antenna tower in her back yard.
Antennas are not addressed within the City's Zoning Ordinance and
therefore are handled on a case by case basis when they exceed
City's height limitations. The maximum height within the
residential district is twenty-five foot (25') for any structure.
Ms. Pentel needs a thirty-seven foot (37') height variance in order
to install her antenna.
Currently the Pentel house has two antennas that staff
estimates are approximately forty feet (40') in height, it is
unclear if Ms. Pentel received variances for these existing
antennas or if she intends to remove them if this current antenna
construction is approved.
Because of the impact that a tower of this size may have,
staff requested signatures of consent from a one block area (see
attached signatures). Staff has received written and telephone
complaints and objections to the construction of the tower (see
attached letter).
Based on the fact that there is neighborhood opposition, the
City should seriously review the hardship requirement necessary for
the granting of a variance.
ACTION REOUIRED
Meet with the applicant to review her requested variance and
make a recommendation to the City Council.
JED/KLB:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
January 17, 1991
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works Dire
Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assi
SUBJECT:
DISCUSSION
CASE NO. 91-04: Pentel - Antenna Height Variance
Ms. Sylvia Pentel, 556 Fremont Avenue, desires to construct a
sixty-two foot (62') high Ham Radio Antenna tower in her back yard.
Antennas are not addressed within the City's Zoning Ordinance and
therefore are handled on a case by case basis when they exceed
City's height limitations. The maximum height within the
residential district is twenty-five foot (25') for any structure.
Ms. Pentel needs a thirty-seven foot (37') height variance in order
to install her antenna.
Currently the Pentel house has two antennas that staff
estimates are approximately forty feet (40') in height, it is
unclear if Ms. Pentel received variances for these existing
antennas or if she intends to remove them if this current antenna
construction is approved.
Because of the impact that a tower of this size may have,
staff requested signatures of consent from a one block area (see
attached signatures). Staff has received written and telephone
complaints and objections to the construction of the tower (see
attached letter).
Based on the fact that there is neighborhood opposition, the
City should seriously review the hardship requirement necessary for
the granting of a variance.
ACTION REOUIRED
Meet with the applicant to review her requested variance and
make a recommendation to the City Council.
JED/KLB:kkb
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: 22 January 1991
CASE NUMBER: 91-04
APPLICANT: Sylvia N. Pentel'r
LOCATION: 556 Fremont Avenue
ACTION REQUESTED: Variance to height
limitation in R-1
district.
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The applicant wishes to install a retractable antenna
tower for receiving and broadcasting amateur radio
communications. The maximum height of the tower at full
extension, including the antenna arrays, is 68 feet. The
tower is proposed to have 2 beam type antenna mounted
perpendicular to and near the top of the tower. The upper
antenna would be 25.1 feet in length and the lower would
be 27.8 feet in length. The proposed tower would be
located in the back yard of the subject property. The
setback dimensions from the side and rear property lines,
as measured from the center of the base of the tower on
the site plan, are as follows:
East side (approx.):_
West side (approx.):
Rear (approx.):
41.5 feet
18.5 feet
78.5 feet
2. The subject property is located in an R-1 district in the
northern portion of the City as indicated on the location
maps attached to this report. The Zoning Ordinance
restricts the height of structures in the R-1 District to
25 feet. Section 20 of the Zoning Ordinance lists several
items that can be increased by 50 percent over the height
requirements specified elsewhere in the ordinance.
Antenna are not listed among these items. Therefore, the
applicant is requesting a variance from the 25 foot height
limitation in the amount of 43 feet.
3. First, we have no argument with the fact that Ms. Pentel
has the right (as does any citizen of Mendota Heights) to
operate an amateur radio out of her home. In fact, she
already does operate such a radio and currently has two
antenna for this purpose on her house. Without measuring
them, I would estimate that the top of the tallest of
these two antenna is perhaps 40 or 45 feet above ground
PLANNING REPORT
DATE: 22 January 1991
CASE NUMBER: 91-04
APPLICANT: Sylvia N. Pentel'r
LOCATION: 556 Fremont Avenue
ACTION REQUESTED: Variance to height
limitation in R-1
district.
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The applicant wishes to install a retractable antenna
tower for receiving and broadcasting amateur radio
communications. The maximum height of the tower at full
extension, including the antenna arrays, is 68 feet. The
tower is proposed to have 2 beam type antenna mounted
perpendicular to and near the top of the tower. The upper
antenna would be 25.1 feet in length and the lower would
be 27.8 feet in length. The proposed tower would be
located in the back yard of the subject property. The
setback dimensions from the side and rear property lines,
as measured from the center of the base of the tower on
the site plan, are as follows:
East side (approx.):_
West side (approx.):
Rear (approx.):
41.5 feet
18.5 feet
78.5 feet
2. The subject property is located in an R-1 district in the
northern portion of the City as indicated on the location
maps attached to this report. The Zoning Ordinance
restricts the height of structures in the R-1 District to
25 feet. Section 20 of the Zoning Ordinance lists several
items that can be increased by 50 percent over the height
requirements specified elsewhere in the ordinance.
Antenna are not listed among these items. Therefore, the
applicant is requesting a variance from the 25 foot height
limitation in the amount of 43 feet.
3. First, we have no argument with the fact that Ms. Pentel
has the right (as does any citizen of Mendota Heights) to
operate an amateur radio out of her home. In fact, she
already does operate such a radio and currently has two
antenna for this purpose on her house. Without measuring
them, I would estimate that the top of the tallest of
these two antenna is perhaps 40 or 45 feet above ground
Sylvia Pentel, Case No. 91-04 Page 2
level. These antenna are of the smaller whip type. No
variance was granted for the existing antenna. Several of
Ms.Pentel's neighbors have expressed opposition,:to the
proposed antenna both by letter and through phone calls to
City Hall. In addition, several of the adjacent neighbors
have refused to sign her letter of consent.
4. The primary criteria for granting variances as indicated
in Section 5.5(1) of the Ordinance requires that the
applicant demonstrate that carrying out the strict letter
of the Ordinance would result in "practical difficulties"
or "particular hardships". Since Ms. Pentel is already
operating an amateur radio out of her home, and
apparently quite successfully based on her letters of
commendation, it would seem that her current antenna are
adequate to meet her needs. Under these circumstances it
seems difficult to justify that there is any hardship and
there is no evidence of hardship offered in Ms. Pentel's
letter.
5. In her letter she states that "to be most efficient, the
antenna must be higher than the surrounding trees and
structures". She also offers a fairly detailed
discussion of why a 70 -foot tall antenna is better than a
35 -foot tall antenna. If we follow this argument further
we could say that a 100 -foot antenna is better than one
that is 70 feet tall. What is missing in this explanation
is what is high enough and what is reasonable based on
other environmental factors like the danger posed to
adjacent single-family homes in the event that this
structure should fall.
6. Based on the height of the tower, when fully extended, and
its proposed location on the property, we can determine
that the homes on either side of the subject property
would be within the fall radius of this structure. This
can probably also be said of the existing antenna. The
difference is that the existing antenna are very small in
comparison to the proposed tower and would not cause any
damage if they were to fall.
One of the reasons we express concern regarding the
question of tower collapse has to do with one of the
functions of amateur radio operations. Ms. Pentel states
in her letter that the basis on which amateur radio
operators are licensed, is their ability to provide
emergency and public service communications. While this
is a very admirable function, it brings up the fact that
in this region some of these emergency situations would
likely be weather related and may result in the proposed
tower being extended and in operation during storms when
the tower would most likely be blown over.
Sylvia Pentel, Case No. 91-04 Page 2
level. These antenna are of the smaller whip type. No
variance was granted for the existing antenna. Several of
Ms.Pentel's neighbors have expressed opposition,:to the
proposed antenna both by letter and through phone calls to
City Hall. In addition, several of the adjacent neighbors
have refused to sign her letter of consent.
4. The primary criteria for granting variances as indicated
in Section 5.5(1) of the Ordinance requires that the
applicant demonstrate that carrying out the strict letter
of the Ordinance would result in "practical difficulties"
or "particular hardships". Since Ms. Pentel is already
operating an amateur radio out of her home, and
apparently quite successfully based on her letters of
commendation, it would seem that her current antenna are
adequate to meet her needs. Under these circumstances it
seems difficult to justify that there is any hardship and
there is no evidence of hardship offered in Ms. Pentel's
letter.
5. In her letter she states that "to be most efficient, the
antenna must be higher than the surrounding trees and
structures". She also offers a fairly detailed
discussion of why a 70 -foot tall antenna is better than a
35 -foot tall antenna. If we follow this argument further
we could say that a 100 -foot antenna is better than one
that is 70 feet tall. What is missing in this explanation
is what is high enough and what is reasonable based on
other environmental factors like the danger posed to
adjacent single-family homes in the event that this
structure should fall.
6. Based on the height of the tower, when fully extended, and
its proposed location on the property, we can determine
that the homes on either side of the subject property
would be within the fall radius of this structure. This
can probably also be said of the existing antenna. The
difference is that the existing antenna are very small in
comparison to the proposed tower and would not cause any
damage if they were to fall.
One of the reasons we express concern regarding the
question of tower collapse has to do with one of the
functions of amateur radio operations. Ms. Pentel states
in her letter that the basis on which amateur radio
operators are licensed, is their ability to provide
emergency and public service communications. While this
is a very admirable function, it brings up the fact that
in this region some of these emergency situations would
likely be weather related and may result in the proposed
tower being extended and in operation during storms when
the tower would most likely be blown over.
Sylvia Pentel, Case No. 91-04 Page 3
7 Another issue related to this tower that was mentioned
earlier is that of the aesthetic impact on the surrounding
area. Clearly, the proposed 68 -foot tall antenna tower
will not be an attractive addition to the neighborhood.
This area is one of the older neighborhoods in Mendota
Heights. The area is characterized by homes relatively
close together on smaller lots. It is likely that the
tower would be visible from several of the adjacent homes.
This situation could be alleviated somewhat by the
applicant retracting the tower when it is not in use.
However, when the tower is up it will be visible. The
possibility of screening the tower from adjacent
properties could also be examined. Though with a tower of
this size, it may difficult to provide effective
screening.
8. A third issue related to antenna towers is the potential
for interference with other television and radio
reception. Amateur radio operators are licensed by the
FCC and one of the primary regulations enforced by the FCC
is that a licensee can not cause interference with other
forms of broadcasting. If this does occur, the licensed
operator is required to correct the problem or they could
lose their license. Should •the proposed antenna cause
such interference, the licensed operator can be reported
to the St Paul Field Operations.Bureau of the FCC.
9. At this point, I would also like to briefly address the
applicant's comments regarding the relationship between
FCC and local zoning regulations as they pertain to
amateur radio facilities. First, let me say that this
issue has been debated in the courts in Minnesota and that
there is some basis to the assertions made in Ms. Pentel's
letter. I would recommend that the City seek an opinion
from its legal counsel regarding the specific law related
to this issue. However, there are a few points that I
believe I can clarify regarding the three FCC principles
outlined on the last page of the applicant's letter.
The first of these suggests that local regulations which
operate to preclude amateur radio communications must be
preempted. There is nothing in the Mendota Heights
Ordinance that is intended to preclude amateur radio
operations. The height restriction, from which the
applicant is requesting a variance, is designed to insure,
among other things, the right of all properties within the
community to adequate light and air. This regulation is
also intended to promote unity in the aesthetic
environment within a given district and avoid future
development that is inconsistent and detrimental to the
existing character of the neighborhood. The Mendota
Heights Ordinance also provides a process for dealing with
special cases where the regulations do not allow the
Sylvia Pentel, Case No. 91-04 Page 3
7 Another issue related to this tower that was mentioned
earlier is that of the aesthetic impact on the surrounding
area. Clearly, the proposed 68 -foot tall antenna tower
will not be an attractive addition to the neighborhood.
This area is one of the older neighborhoods in Mendota
Heights. The area is characterized by homes relatively
close together on smaller lots. It is likely that the
tower would be visible from several of the adjacent homes.
This situation could be alleviated somewhat by the
applicant retracting the tower when it is not in use.
However, when the tower is up it will be visible. The
possibility of screening the tower from adjacent
properties could also be examined. Though with a tower of
this size, it may difficult to provide effective
screening.
8. A third issue related to antenna towers is the potential
for interference with other television and radio
reception. Amateur radio operators are licensed by the
FCC and one of the primary regulations enforced by the FCC
is that a licensee can not cause interference with other
forms of broadcasting. If this does occur, the licensed
operator is required to correct the problem or they could
lose their license. Should •the proposed antenna cause
such interference, the licensed operator can be reported
to the St Paul Field Operations.Bureau of the FCC.
9. At this point, I would also like to briefly address the
applicant's comments regarding the relationship between
FCC and local zoning regulations as they pertain to
amateur radio facilities. First, let me say that this
issue has been debated in the courts in Minnesota and that
there is some basis to the assertions made in Ms. Pentel's
letter. I would recommend that the City seek an opinion
from its legal counsel regarding the specific law related
to this issue. However, there are a few points that I
believe I can clarify regarding the three FCC principles
outlined on the last page of the applicant's letter.
The first of these suggests that local regulations which
operate to preclude amateur radio communications must be
preempted. There is nothing in the Mendota Heights
Ordinance that is intended to preclude amateur radio
operations. The height restriction, from which the
applicant is requesting a variance, is designed to insure,
among other things, the right of all properties within the
community to adequate light and air. This regulation is
also intended to promote unity in the aesthetic
environment within a given district and avoid future
development that is inconsistent and detrimental to the
existing character of the neighborhood. The Mendota
Heights Ordinance also provides a process for dealing with
special cases where the regulations do not allow the
Sylvia Pentel, Case No. 91-04 Page 4
reasonable use of private property. That process, known
as the variance approval process, is the one the
applicant's request is currently being reviewed under.
10. We feel that a fair response to the second and third
principles identified in the applicant's letter is that
the regulations in a local ordinance must balance what is
an acceptable level of efficiency for the applicant's
radio reception with a reasonable assurance of safety and
an acceptable amount of visual intrusion for the
surrounding property owners. To this end we offer the
following recommendation.
In light of the fact that the applicant is already
operating an amateur radio in her home with the existing
antenna and there is legitimate concern with respect to
the safety and welfare of the adjacent property owners, we
believe there is ample grounds to recommend denial of the
applicant's request.
However, should the Commission wish to entertain the idea
of approving the antenna with conditions, we would
recommend that the ordinance be amended to consider such
antenna as conditional uses. While the current ordinance
authorizes the City to place conditions and safeguards on
variances, the conditions on variances are difficult to
enforce because, unlike a Conditional Use Permit, a
variance cannot be revoked. Some of the .conditions that
could be considered are: the requirement that the
retractable tower only be permitted to be extended during
operation. It could be further stipulated that the tower
be extended no more that a certain number of hours per
day. The tower could also be required to be so located,
and its height limited, such that in the event that it
collapsed it would not fall on any adjacent residence.
Finally, as mentioned earlier, the City could require that
the tower be screened.
Sylvia Pentel, Case No. 91-04 Page 4
reasonable use of private property. That process, known
as the variance approval process, is the one the
applicant's request is currently being reviewed under.
10. We feel that a fair response to the second and third
principles identified in the applicant's letter is that
the regulations in a local ordinance must balance what is
an acceptable level of efficiency for the applicant's
radio reception with a reasonable assurance of safety and
an acceptable amount of visual intrusion for the
surrounding property owners. To this end we offer the
following recommendation.
In light of the fact that the applicant is already
operating an amateur radio in her home with the existing
antenna and there is legitimate concern with respect to
the safety and welfare of the adjacent property owners, we
believe there is ample grounds to recommend denial of the
applicant's request.
However, should the Commission wish to entertain the idea
of approving the antenna with conditions, we would
recommend that the ordinance be amended to consider such
antenna as conditional uses. While the current ordinance
authorizes the City to place conditions and safeguards on
variances, the conditions on variances are difficult to
enforce because, unlike a Conditional Use Permit, a
variance cannot be revoked. Some of the .conditions that
could be considered are: the requirement that the
retractable tower only be permitted to be extended during
operation. It could be further stipulated that the tower
be extended no more that a certain number of hours per
day. The tower could also be required to be so located,
and its height limited, such that in the event that it
collapsed it would not fall on any adjacent residence.
Finally, as mentioned earlier, the City could require that
the tower be screened.
U.
c ,. ' �E filkiiii.in, ms/ t SUBJECT PROPERTY : f tmlimp1lH11s = - I =
NORTH �`• 101101: La NEE
Sdr
CALE 1 "=800' AOlt�� iii MI °"g°`
irgigt"V4Citri llira Egliiirimi
IMI11%?Tratial "MM
411 54E41 %4() j I III b a MI I 1 art
4111614111fflig
l �Wil".. 11.3
.o�e �:
silliiii al all
rA
d�innninumniw,..a'...v�o ♦ �'
dampail.,-,..E7 i ... ��OWL% : �, �ow�� ���:
n:
$. :mmiiu111111lerralag . • oo`_, 1 �:
v•�VIElop,/ .F.1.129 m
NORTH O .0 ro 11 , ���� W
Ir •a,
kali Jell*.
c
�llln�lllil�1111111 '
Itilinni !,41 II 1
ouunariplonvinetiff
iilili! �HIIIIIBi01e1�
.._a om
`..,.-1o ,00�; }�i000 lemeii enu
`os ..�0�a T
��L
0000 ofil iilil:
Inn umun all,
�p11IIB OIOIo'�o
�muglllfp is
COUNTRY CLUB
GOLF COURSE
(Private)
U.
c ,. ' �E filkiiii.in, ms/ t SUBJECT PROPERTY : f tmlimp1lH11s = - I =
NORTH �`• 101101: La NEE
Sdr
CALE 1 "=800' AOlt�� iii MI °"g°`
irgigt"V4Citri llira Egliiirimi
IMI11%?Tratial "MM
411 54E41 %4() j I III b a MI I 1 art
4111614111fflig
l �Wil".. 11.3
.o�e �:
silliiii al all
rA
d�innninumniw,..a'...v�o ♦ �'
dampail.,-,..E7 i ... ��OWL% : �, �ow�� ���:
n:
$. :mmiiu111111lerralag . • oo`_, 1 �:
v•�VIElop,/ .F.1.129 m
NORTH O .0 ro 11 , ���� W
Ir •a,
kali Jell*.
c
�llln�lllil�1111111 '
Itilinni !,41 II 1
ouunariplonvinetiff
iilili! �HIIIIIBi01e1�
.._a om
`..,.-1o ,00�; }�i000 lemeii enu
`os ..�0�a T
��L
0000 ofil iilil:
Inn umun all,
�p11IIB OIOIo'�o
�muglllfp is
COUNTRY CLUB
GOLF COURSE
(Private)
'AUL
�28,cs, 014 Lo."
J P
16'° Z1-
24.2z9
-• > 3
n,
0.0
Q' cA6
Q 't•
R U
40
4
O
/Z
//
/0
9
8
7
s
4
a
SUBJECT PROPERTY
NORTH t
(a 743 SCALE 1"=200'
>' Beic.e
Ac
re E NT
Z
0
1Zo F
HIAVVAIHA
•
sr.
/20
2
3
4
tzo 4
Sr
LJ E N ( A
P C/emcW •
.4 La,4 9
O '3
ER RkApD
z
707.75
i, . 1
.44
!,!f
a 4
/Se
ws7l'•o
0
S G 7
144Q414,/
/74 414%
/37 tis 70 90 ZOG 37
z
4S7
LAWSON
sr.
Z
`o
1447
0
/
••
Z
I •..
3
4
.•
5
44.5"/
c
Hct
0
•
7 ,
Q
So
GS
753
S0
o
A
5 b S 10. h
ill
• 4 B -
.4 , .
41)
/O
•1 // h
__
2 __yZ---_�
44- -
24O
/
/g 5'
3°------F-
/id
• -
t 21
Z.
. 2Y
3
a 27 4
h tG
/fy
4 t4 ``
e 'CS •p
2Lh 1
20 I0
` 19 12. P
1
=1f ` (3�o
t (3 Q L a
(L V 4 % •
1.
des
4Q' 9 a
g • 7
L34-
'"/ 1
0.
• i •
3 ,
Z
'AUL
�28,cs, 014 Lo."
J P
16'° Z1-
24.2z9
-• > 3
n,
0.0
Q' cA6
Q 't•
R U
40
4
O
/Z
//
/0
9
8
7
s
4
a
SUBJECT PROPERTY
NORTH t
(a 743 SCALE 1"=200'
>' Beic.e
Ac
re E NT
Z
0
1Zo F
HIAVVAIHA
•
sr.
/20
2
3
4
tzo 4
Sr
LJ E N ( A
P C/emcW •
.4 La,4 9
O '3
ER RkApD
z
707.75
i, . 1
.44
!,!f
a 4
/Se
ws7l'•o
0
S G 7
144Q414,/
/74 414%
/37 tis 70 90 ZOG 37
z
4S7
LAWSON
sr.
Z
`o
1447
0
/
••
Z
I •..
3
4
.•
5
44.5"/
c
Hct
0
•
7 ,
Q
So
GS
753
S0
o
A
5 b S 10. h
ill
• 4 B -
.4 , .
41)
/O
•1 // h
__
2 __yZ---_�
44- -
24O
/
/g 5'
3°------F-
/id
• -
t 21
Z.
. 2Y
3
a 27 4
h tG
/fy
4 t4 ``
e 'CS •p
2Lh 1
20 I0
` 19 12. P
1
=1f ` (3�o
t (3 Q L a
(L V 4 % •
1.
des
4Q' 9 a
g • 7
L34-
'"/ 1
0.
• i •
3 ,
Z
ROEDLER & BELLOWS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
GEORGE R. ROEDLER, JR
JOHN B. BELLOWS, JR.
?ec9 f- 2a-90
1075 LANDMARK TOWERS
345 ST. PETER STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
January 21, 1991
Attn Kevin L..Batcheldor
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Planning Commission
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batcheldor:
(612) 291-8015
We are assisting Sylvia Pentel in her application for a
variance to erect an amateur radio tower and antenna
located at 556 Fremont, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, (Case
No. 91-04). The purpose of this letter and its attach-
ments is to provide you with additional information
regarding the applicant, Sylvia Pentel, her intended use
of the tower and antenna, the necessity of a tower for
reliable and amateur communications and general infor-
mation regarding amateur radio and its benefits to the
community.
I. BACKGROUND - SYLVIA PENTEL
First of all, I would like to further acquaint you with
the applicant, Sylvia Pentel. Ms. Pentel was first
licensed in 1988. She has continually been active in ama-
teur radio since that time. .In addition to utilizing ama-
teur radio as a hobby activity, much of her time has been
involved in public service activities, most particularly
involving emergency service communications and the
National Disaster Medical System. -
Beginning in 1987, Ms. Pentel became involved in the
National Disaster Medical System. NDMS is a nationwide
organization that is part of the Office of Emergency
Preparedness. NDMS is headquartered in the Twin Cities.
Essentially, the System -is responsible for the coor-
dination and use of 100,000 hospital beds in the event of
national emergency. Prior to becoming involved with NDMS,
Ms. Pentel had been aware•of.amateur radio and had an
interest in the hobby. As her interest in amateur radio
ROEDLER & BELLOWS
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
GEORGE R. ROEDLER, JR
JOHN B. BELLOWS, JR.
?ec9 f- 2a-90
1075 LANDMARK TOWERS
345 ST. PETER STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102
January 21, 1991
Attn Kevin L..Batcheldor
Administrative Assistant
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Planning Commission
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights MN 55118
Dear Mr. Batcheldor:
(612) 291-8015
We are assisting Sylvia Pentel in her application for a
variance to erect an amateur radio tower and antenna
located at 556 Fremont, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, (Case
No. 91-04). The purpose of this letter and its attach-
ments is to provide you with additional information
regarding the applicant, Sylvia Pentel, her intended use
of the tower and antenna, the necessity of a tower for
reliable and amateur communications and general infor-
mation regarding amateur radio and its benefits to the
community.
I. BACKGROUND - SYLVIA PENTEL
First of all, I would like to further acquaint you with
the applicant, Sylvia Pentel. Ms. Pentel was first
licensed in 1988. She has continually been active in ama-
teur radio since that time. .In addition to utilizing ama-
teur radio as a hobby activity, much of her time has been
involved in public service activities, most particularly
involving emergency service communications and the
National Disaster Medical System. -
Beginning in 1987, Ms. Pentel became involved in the
National Disaster Medical System. NDMS is a nationwide
organization that is part of the Office of Emergency
Preparedness. NDMS is headquartered in the Twin Cities.
Essentially, the System -is responsible for the coor-
dination and use of 100,000 hospital beds in the event of
national emergency. Prior to becoming involved with NDMS,
Ms. Pentel had been aware•of.amateur radio and had an
interest in the hobby. As her interest in amateur radio
Letter to: City of Mendota Heights
Dated: January 21, 1991
Page No. 2
is also engaged in very high frequency (VHF) amateur com-
munications. These communications tend to be more or less
line of sight communications (see Hall). Any restriction
of the placement of VHF antennas lower than 62 feet would
essentially preclude effective VHF communication by Ms.
Pentel.
IV. AMATEUR RADIO PROFILE
We are also attaching to this letter as Exhibit C, an
Amateur Radio Profile, setting forth background infor-
mation as to the amateur radio service, the activities in
which amateurs engage, and some of the benefits to the
community from amateur radio. It should be noted that
there are a number of amateur radio operators currently
living the City of Mendota Heights. The Amateur Radio
Profile attached to this letter provides background infor-
mation as to the nature of amateur radio and the benefits
to this community from amateur radio.
I hope the above information is of assistance to you in
understanding Sylvia Pentel, who she is, her considerable
talents and expertise, and the substantial benefits she
and amateurs like her have provided, and continue to pro-
vide, to their communities. The benefits to be derived
from the tower and antenna proposed by Ms. Pentel, are
substantial. Her sensitivity to concerns of her neighbors
as to matters of aesthetics is evidenced by the fact the
pending application is for the minimum tower height
necessary to provide reasonably adequate communications at
this site.
Should you have any questions concerning any of the mat-
ters set forth in this letter or attachments, please feel
free to contact me at your convenience.
Yours truly,
ROEDLER & B
JOHN B
JBB:jm
Attach
Letter to: City of Mendota Heights
Dated: January 21, 1991
Page No. 2
is also engaged in very high frequency (VHF) amateur com-
munications. These communications tend to be more or less
line of sight communications (see Hall). Any restriction
of the placement of VHF antennas lower than 62 feet would
essentially preclude effective VHF communication by Ms.
Pentel.
IV. AMATEUR RADIO PROFILE
We are also attaching to this letter as Exhibit C, an
Amateur Radio Profile, setting forth background infor-
mation as to the amateur radio service, the activities in
which amateurs engage, and some of the benefits to the
community from amateur radio. It should be noted that
there are a number of amateur radio operators currently
living the City of Mendota Heights. The Amateur Radio
Profile attached to this letter provides background infor-
mation as to the nature of amateur radio and the benefits
to this community from amateur radio.
I hope the above information is of assistance to you in
understanding Sylvia Pentel, who she is, her considerable
talents and expertise, and the substantial benefits she
and amateurs like her have provided, and continue to pro-
vide, to their communities. The benefits to be derived
from the tower and antenna proposed by Ms. Pentel, are
substantial. Her sensitivity to concerns of her neighbors
as to matters of aesthetics is evidenced by the fact the
pending application is for the minimum tower height
necessary to provide reasonably adequate communications at
this site.
Should you have any questions concerning any of the mat-
ters set forth in this letter or attachments, please feel
free to contact me at your convenience.
Yours truly,
ROEDLER & B
JOHN B
JBB:jm
Attach
INFORMATION CONCERNING PLANNED
AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNA INSTALLATION
AT 556 FREMONT AVENUE
My name is Sylvia Pentel, NOMRW, and I have lived at 556 Fremont Avenue
since May, 1974. My telephone number is 457-4999.
In addition to earning my living by handling Estate sales, I am also on the
Board of Directors of Notification Systems, a nationwide firm dealing with
the banking system.
As you may or may not know my hobby is amateur radio and I am licensed by
the Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.), and must adhere to their
rules and regulations. I am also a member in good standing of the American
Radio Relay League (A.R.R.L.). One of the necessary and most important
elements of radio communications is the antenna system.
It is my desire to install, next Spring, a rotatable beam antenna and self-
supporting, crank -up tower to support and elevate the antenna above the trees
in my back yard. (Foliage on trees absorb radio waves, preventing proper
transmissions. To be most efficient the antenna must be higher than
surrounding trees and structures.)
The intended tower will be installed by professionals azrdhthe work will be
performed in a manner required by applicable regulations, codes and ordin-
ances of the city of Mendota Heights, including inspections required by law.
The retracted height of the tower is about 21 feet and the maximum extended
height, including antenna, will be about 62 feet. The details of the proposed
construction are shown on the attaphed drawing. This system should in no
way affect the use of properly desi fined and manufactured telephones,
television or other electronic devices which meet with F.C.C. standards.
Attached is a sheet witti Vie signatures of my neighbors, as requested. Also
attached you will find other helpful information.
INFORMATION CONCERNING PLANNED
AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNA INSTALLATION
AT 556 FREMONT AVENUE
My name is Sylvia Pentel, NOMRW, and I have lived at 556 Fremont Avenue
since May, 1974. My telephone number is 457-4999.
In addition to earning my living by handling Estate sales, I am also on the
Board of Directors of Notification Systems, a nationwide firm dealing with
the banking system.
As you may or may not know my hobby is amateur radio and I am licensed by
the Federal Communications Commission (F.C.C.), and must adhere to their
rules and regulations. I am also a member in good standing of the American
Radio Relay League (A.R.R.L.). One of the necessary and most important
elements of radio communications is the antenna system.
It is my desire to install, next Spring, a rotatable beam antenna and self-
supporting, crank -up tower to support and elevate the antenna above the trees
in my back yard. (Foliage on trees absorb radio waves, preventing proper
transmissions. To be most efficient the antenna must be higher than
surrounding trees and structures.)
The intended tower will be installed by professionals azrdhthe work will be
performed in a manner required by applicable regulations, codes and ordin-
ances of the city of Mendota Heights, including inspections required by law.
The retracted height of the tower is about 21 feet and the maximum extended
height, including antenna, will be about 62 feet. The details of the proposed
construction are shown on the attaphed drawing. This system should in no
way affect the use of properly desi fined and manufactured telephones,
television or other electronic devices which meet with F.C.C. standards.
Attached is a sheet witti Vie signatures of my neighbors, as requested. Also
attached you will find other helpful information.
The following is information from "Antenna Height and Communications
Effectiveness", by G. L. Hall, K1TD, of the A.R.R.L.:
Amateur Radio Communications between two distant points on the earth rely
on signals propagating through the ionosphere. Acting as somewhat of a
mirror at heights in the order of 150 miles, the ionosphere returns signals to
the earth a thousand or more miles away.
The vertical angle of radiation is the key factor in determining effective
communications distances beyond line of sight. For the greatest possible
communications distance, the energy from the transmitter must be radiated
at angles close to the horizon. For this to take place, a horizontal antenna
must be placed high above the ground in terms of wavelengths. The length of
a radio wave is inversely related to its frequency.
A beam type of antenna at a height of 70 feet or more will provide greatly
superior performance over the same antenna at 35 feet, all other factors
being equal. To a distant receiving station, a transmitting antenna at 70 feet
will provide the effect of approximately 3 to 4 times more transmitter power
than the same antenna at 35 feet. Depending on the level of noise and
interference, this performance disparity is often enough to mean the
difference between making distant radio contact with fairly reliable signals,
and being unable to make distant contact at all. Thus, the antenna at 35 feet
is unsatisfactory, while the same antenna at 70 feet is quite satisfactory.
The 70 -feet height is used only for the purpose of illustration, however, and
should not be construed as the optimum height for antennas.
If an amateur operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, it is
reasonable to assume he will obtain more powerful transmitting equipment to
compensate for the loss of antenna effectiveness. For example, he might
increase his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1.5 kilowatts, to
compensate for a three -fold loss in antenna effectiveness because of height
limitations. This increase in power, in turn, increases the possibilities for
his signal to overload nearby television and radio receivers, creating
interference for viewers and listeners.
A high amateur antenna provides a greater degree of immunity from television
interference than does a low antenna. The sole source of radiated RF energy
from the Amateur Radio station is its antenna. Raising that antenna to an
increased height, well above the level of existing antennas for television
reception, will reducO the possibility of interference to television reception
from fundamental overload.
The following is information from "Antenna Height and Communications
Effectiveness", by G. L. Hall, K1TD, of the A.R.R.L.:
Amateur Radio Communications between two distant points on the earth rely
on signals propagating through the ionosphere. Acting as somewhat of a
mirror at heights in the order of 150 miles, the ionosphere returns signals to
the earth a thousand or more miles away.
The vertical angle of radiation is the key factor in determining effective
communications distances beyond line of sight. For the greatest possible
communications distance, the energy from the transmitter must be radiated
at angles close to the horizon. For this to take place, a horizontal antenna
must be placed high above the ground in terms of wavelengths. The length of
a radio wave is inversely related to its frequency.
A beam type of antenna at a height of 70 feet or more will provide greatly
superior performance over the same antenna at 35 feet, all other factors
being equal. To a distant receiving station, a transmitting antenna at 70 feet
will provide the effect of approximately 3 to 4 times more transmitter power
than the same antenna at 35 feet. Depending on the level of noise and
interference, this performance disparity is often enough to mean the
difference between making distant radio contact with fairly reliable signals,
and being unable to make distant contact at all. Thus, the antenna at 35 feet
is unsatisfactory, while the same antenna at 70 feet is quite satisfactory.
The 70 -feet height is used only for the purpose of illustration, however, and
should not be construed as the optimum height for antennas.
If an amateur operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, it is
reasonable to assume he will obtain more powerful transmitting equipment to
compensate for the loss of antenna effectiveness. For example, he might
increase his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1.5 kilowatts, to
compensate for a three -fold loss in antenna effectiveness because of height
limitations. This increase in power, in turn, increases the possibilities for
his signal to overload nearby television and radio receivers, creating
interference for viewers and listeners.
A high amateur antenna provides a greater degree of immunity from television
interference than does a low antenna. The sole source of radiated RF energy
from the Amateur Radio station is its antenna. Raising that antenna to an
increased height, well above the level of existing antennas for television
reception, will reducO the possibility of interference to television reception
from fundamental overload.
The following is helpful information from the Office of Legal Counsel of the
A.R.R.L., Washington, D.C.:
The basis upon which Radio Amateurs are licensed, is their ability to provide
emergency and public service communications.
The F.C.C. (Federal Communications Commission) has set forth three
• principles governing local zoning regulation of amateur radio facilities:
1. State and local regulations that operate to preclude
amateur communications in their communities are in
direct conflict with federal objectives and must be
preempted.
2. Local regulations which involve placement, screening,
or height of antennas based on health, safety or aesthetic
considerations must be crafted to accommodate
reasonably amateur communications.
3. Local regulations must represent the minimum practicable
regulation to accomplish the local authority's legitimate
purpose.
It is suggested that no blanket maximum height be specified in any ordinance
adopted but, instead, require that all amateur antennas, in addition to meeting
structural requirements, be installed in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions.
The following is helpful information from the Office of Legal Counsel of the
A.R.R.L., Washington, D.C.:
The basis upon which Radio Amateurs are licensed, is their ability to provide
emergency and public service communications.
The F.C.C. (Federal Communications Commission) has set forth three
• principles governing local zoning regulation of amateur radio facilities:
1. State and local regulations that operate to preclude
amateur communications in their communities are in
direct conflict with federal objectives and must be
preempted.
2. Local regulations which involve placement, screening,
or height of antennas based on health, safety or aesthetic
considerations must be crafted to accommodate
reasonably amateur communications.
3. Local regulations must represent the minimum practicable
regulation to accomplish the local authority's legitimate
purpose.
It is suggested that no blanket maximum height be specified in any ordinance
adopted but, instead, require that all amateur antennas, in addition to meeting
structural requirements, be installed in accordance with manufacturer's
instructions.
mJ City of
Mendota Heights
Applicant Name:
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. 9'/— 6a1 •
Date of Application I– 4 - q /
Fee Paid 36,00 «e(4r: 2..5-12_1-
H. PH:
(First) (Mi)
(Last)
Address: FI9Gtea40 .1(4i(vorif 1/75:
ittiu 6--cw
Owner Name:
Address:
(Number & Street) , (City) •
m. 6
• (First) "
(State) (Zip) , , •,
(Number & Street)
(City) (State) (Zip)
Street Location of Propertyin Question: 7K---114 J7 A 11.
` 1 . , • „ .
Legal Description of Property: -• A//liv."27 • • -
•
. , .
Type of Request:
Rezoning •
Conditional Use Permit ••
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. • •
Plan.Approval • ' • • " •
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Applicable City Ordinance Number
Present Zoning of PriTert); Present Use
/Variance - '• •
Subdivision Approval. • •
Wetlands Permit
Other (attach explanation)
• Section
- •
/F/f / L. V . • ,;
Proposed Zoning of Pmperty Pniposed Use A, 42: F f
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true. .•• • •
. •
.• ."
(Signa fof Applicant) •
(Date)
•
_r.
- (Received by - Title)
-
1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN 55118 4521850
mJ City of
Mendota Heights
Applicant Name:
APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION
OF
PLANNING REQUEST
Case No. 9'/— 6a1 •
Date of Application I– 4 - q /
Fee Paid 36,00 «e(4r: 2..5-12_1-
H. PH:
(First) (Mi)
(Last)
Address: FI9Gtea40 .1(4i(vorif 1/75:
ittiu 6--cw
Owner Name:
Address:
(Number & Street) , (City) •
m. 6
• (First) "
(State) (Zip) , , •,
(Number & Street)
(City) (State) (Zip)
Street Location of Propertyin Question: 7K---114 J7 A 11.
` 1 . , • „ .
Legal Description of Property: -• A//liv."27 • • -
•
. , .
Type of Request:
Rezoning •
Conditional Use Permit ••
Conditional Use Permit for P.U.D. • •
Plan.Approval • ' • • " •
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Applicable City Ordinance Number
Present Zoning of PriTert); Present Use
/Variance - '• •
Subdivision Approval. • •
Wetlands Permit
Other (attach explanation)
• Section
- •
/F/f / L. V . • ,;
Proposed Zoning of Pmperty Pniposed Use A, 42: F f
I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional
material are true. .•• • •
. •
.• ."
(Signa fof Applicant) •
(Date)
•
_r.
- (Received by - Title)
-
1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN 55118 4521850
r
UI?Pee
x212
ADDRESS
5 549 HIAWATHA
555 HIAWATHA
561 HIAWATHA
605 GARDEN LANE
576 HIGHWAY 13
568 FREMONT
PETITION
(Sylvia Pentel - Page 2)
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURE
DATE
Fec 1olJT ..- -
e-At4,562 FREMONT
52 FREMONT
546 FREMONT
544 ANNAPOLIS
552 ANNAPOLIS
556 ANNAPOLIS
oc.P7
ait, 511dia)i-P 04/1a)d-
c)eu
Lin
560 ANNAPOLIS /
THANK YOU!
r
UI?Pee
x212
ADDRESS
5 549 HIAWATHA
555 HIAWATHA
561 HIAWATHA
605 GARDEN LANE
576 HIGHWAY 13
568 FREMONT
PETITION
(Sylvia Pentel - Page 2)
SIGNATURES
SIGNATURE
DATE
Fec 1olJT ..- -
e-At4,562 FREMONT
52 FREMONT
546 FREMONT
544 ANNAPOLIS
552 ANNAPOLIS
556 ANNAPOLIS
oc.P7
ait, 511dia)i-P 04/1a)d-
c)eu
Lin
560 ANNAPOLIS /
THANK YOU!
Medical Center 1 Veterans Drive
Minneapolis MN 55411
cy3Veterans
Administration
October 18, 1990 In Reply Refer To: OOE
Mr. Richard Palm
Field Services Manager
Amateur Radio Relay League
225 Main Street
Newington, CT 06111
Dear Mr. Palm:
This letter is intended as a Letter of Commendation. I wish to make it
known to the Amateur Radio Relay League that Sylvia Pentel, KBODQB, my
Communications Officer, has displayed an exemplary performance of her
duties in planning, organizing and conducting the Amateur Radio
communications for our National Disaster Medical System disaster drills.
Sylvia is a person of great integrity, and is a credit to the field of
Amateur Radio Communications. In the four years she has been with us,
she has proven herself a well -organized, extremely capable person who •
has always carried out her responsibilities.
On Saturday, October 13, 1990, at the U.S. Air National Guard base in -
Minneapolis, the National Disaster Medical System conducted a disaster
training exercise.
From our Military Emergency Operations Center on the base, Sylvia was in
charge of our Amateur Radio communications network, which included a
dozen operators in the Amateur Radio Net Control center and two dozen
additional Amateurs in key areas on base, plus a five -man Amateur
Fast -Scan Television crew who enabled us to view the entire drill in color
from inside the Command Center. Also included were teams of operators
at hospitals throughout the Twin Cities; operators in St. Cloud, Waconia
and Shakopee, MN, and on the ambulance to Rochester; operators on two
city buses which transported patients after the drill; and the HF station,
which handled communications from the Twin Cities to several other
states, from the East coast to the West coast, with great success.
"America is #1—Thanks to our Veterans"
Medical Center 1 Veterans Drive
Minneapolis MN 55411
cy3Veterans
Administration
October 18, 1990 In Reply Refer To: OOE
Mr. Richard Palm
Field Services Manager
Amateur Radio Relay League
225 Main Street
Newington, CT 06111
Dear Mr. Palm:
This letter is intended as a Letter of Commendation. I wish to make it
known to the Amateur Radio Relay League that Sylvia Pentel, KBODQB, my
Communications Officer, has displayed an exemplary performance of her
duties in planning, organizing and conducting the Amateur Radio
communications for our National Disaster Medical System disaster drills.
Sylvia is a person of great integrity, and is a credit to the field of
Amateur Radio Communications. In the four years she has been with us,
she has proven herself a well -organized, extremely capable person who •
has always carried out her responsibilities.
On Saturday, October 13, 1990, at the U.S. Air National Guard base in -
Minneapolis, the National Disaster Medical System conducted a disaster
training exercise.
From our Military Emergency Operations Center on the base, Sylvia was in
charge of our Amateur Radio communications network, which included a
dozen operators in the Amateur Radio Net Control center and two dozen
additional Amateurs in key areas on base, plus a five -man Amateur
Fast -Scan Television crew who enabled us to view the entire drill in color
from inside the Command Center. Also included were teams of operators
at hospitals throughout the Twin Cities; operators in St. Cloud, Waconia
and Shakopee, MN, and on the ambulance to Rochester; operators on two
city buses which transported patients after the drill; and the HF station,
which handled communications from the Twin Cities to several other
states, from the East coast to the West coast, with great success.
"America is #1—Thanks to our Veterans"
In addition to communications with her Net Control and other operators,
she personally handled communications with Military personnel, the
Military Police, and the Medical Transportation Supervisor.
Numerous Military persons, some with as many as 30 years experience in
all types of conditions including combat and emergency communications,
have stated that they have never seen communications handled so
efficiently and with such discipline.
Regardless of hOw hectic the activities became, all areas of
communication were handled with 'the utmost calmness and proficiency.
One retired Colonel, who is also a 35 -year veteran announcer of radio and
TV, stated that in all his years in the military and broadcasting, he has
never seen such a 'tight ship' and communications handled so well. This
same type of comment was heard over and over again both during and after
the drill.
In addition to coordinating our local communications, Sylvia has been
instrumental in providing us with Amateur Radio contacts throughout the
United States for the disaster drill. No matter what responsibility is
handed her, she carries it through, and does it well.
In closing, I would like to recommend that Sylvia be officially recognized
by the Amateur Radio Relay League for her excellent performance of duty.
Please keep me informed as to what actions you will be taking on this •
recommendation.
Sincerely yours,
Ed Lord, Acting Deputy Director
Office of Emergency Medical Preparedness
c: Mr. Howard Mark
In addition to communications with her Net Control and other operators,
she personally handled communications with Military personnel, the
Military Police, and the Medical Transportation Supervisor.
Numerous Military persons, some with as many as 30 years experience in
all types of conditions including combat and emergency communications,
have stated that they have never seen communications handled so
efficiently and with such discipline.
Regardless of hOw hectic the activities became, all areas of
communication were handled with 'the utmost calmness and proficiency.
One retired Colonel, who is also a 35 -year veteran announcer of radio and
TV, stated that in all his years in the military and broadcasting, he has
never seen such a 'tight ship' and communications handled so well. This
same type of comment was heard over and over again both during and after
the drill.
In addition to coordinating our local communications, Sylvia has been
instrumental in providing us with Amateur Radio contacts throughout the
United States for the disaster drill. No matter what responsibility is
handed her, she carries it through, and does it well.
In closing, I would like to recommend that Sylvia be officially recognized
by the Amateur Radio Relay League for her excellent performance of duty.
Please keep me informed as to what actions you will be taking on this •
recommendation.
Sincerely yours,
Ed Lord, Acting Deputy Director
Office of Emergency Medical Preparedness
c: Mr. Howard Mark
•••••••••=.••••••••o
THE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE, INC.
INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT OF THE INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR RADIO UNION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT, U. S. A. 06111
October 23, 1990
Ed Lord
Acting Deputy - Director .•• ..
Office.of Emergency -Medical Preparedness
Veterans -Administration
1 Veterans. Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55417
Dear Mr. Lord:
Thank you -for. your October• 18. letter. commending-.Sylvia-Pentel,
KBODQB..for-her exemplary performance-in.planning,-organizing and•
conducting the Amateur Radio communications for your NDMS disaster
drill
LARRY E. PRICE
W4RA. PRESIDENT
GEORGE S. WILSON HI
W40114 FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
ROONEY J. STAFFORD
KBSZV. VCE PRESIDENT
JIM HAYNIE
WBSIBP. VICE PRESIDENT
JAY A. HOLLADAY
WSZ J,
VCE PRESIDENT
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
DAVID SUMNER
K1ZZ. EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
SECRETARY
JAMES E. McCO88
K1LLU TREASURER
203-666-1541
FAX: 203-665-7531
QST,
OFFICIAL JOURNAL
• - We -are. most. pleased to learn of the vital -role that .Amateur. Radio
played in your -exercise, and that -it was carried out with a great
amount of efficiency and discipline.
• . -In-response-to your recommendation,..we.wi-11 arrange for the
presentation of an ARRL Emergency Communication -Commendation -to Sylvia
by.local League-officials..We..will•also. reproduce.you r.commendation
letter.in our.public service newsletters-.so.that.the.rest of our Field
Organization will be informed of Sylvia's achievements.
Thank you again for calling our attention to her fine work.
Sincerely yours,
Richard -Palm.
Field Services Manager
cc: George Frederickson, KCOT
C I AI f' C 1 n 4 A n C OV A PI n r r, n r I I r rn n n 1 rl n n n r r I I .-
•••••••••=.••••••••o
THE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE, INC.
INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT OF THE INTERNATIONAL AMATEUR RADIO UNION
ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS NEWINGTON, CONNECTICUT, U. S. A. 06111
October 23, 1990
Ed Lord
Acting Deputy - Director .•• ..
Office.of Emergency -Medical Preparedness
Veterans -Administration
1 Veterans. Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55417
Dear Mr. Lord:
Thank you -for. your October• 18. letter. commending-.Sylvia-Pentel,
KBODQB..for-her exemplary performance-in.planning,-organizing and•
conducting the Amateur Radio communications for your NDMS disaster
drill
LARRY E. PRICE
W4RA. PRESIDENT
GEORGE S. WILSON HI
W40114 FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
ROONEY J. STAFFORD
KBSZV. VCE PRESIDENT
JIM HAYNIE
WBSIBP. VICE PRESIDENT
JAY A. HOLLADAY
WSZ J,
VCE PRESIDENT
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
DAVID SUMNER
K1ZZ. EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
SECRETARY
JAMES E. McCO88
K1LLU TREASURER
203-666-1541
FAX: 203-665-7531
QST,
OFFICIAL JOURNAL
• - We -are. most. pleased to learn of the vital -role that .Amateur. Radio
played in your -exercise, and that -it was carried out with a great
amount of efficiency and discipline.
• . -In-response-to your recommendation,..we.wi-11 arrange for the
presentation of an ARRL Emergency Communication -Commendation -to Sylvia
by.local League-officials..We..will•also. reproduce.you r.commendation
letter.in our.public service newsletters-.so.that.the.rest of our Field
Organization will be informed of Sylvia's achievements.
Thank you again for calling our attention to her fine work.
Sincerely yours,
Richard -Palm.
Field Services Manager
cc: George Frederickson, KCOT
C I AI f' C 1 n 4 A n C OV A PI n r r, n r I I r rn n n 1 rl n n n r r I I .-
mommi
.- '• M
AAAAAAA
City of
Mendota Heights
January 28, 1991
Ms. S. Pentel
556 Fremont Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Pentel:
Your application for a Ck)eloklAc--12-'
will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled
meeting, which will beheld on Tuesday, cc.(0. . The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
Zlanning Commission
(-etc res 4-69
0 s t -r u
recommended i(A04- Gurtcc(
Vek-v-ca_v‘Le.-
+r) t
-4L -1
k
fr-1.4.4- •
yo (.3 C CccS.e. Li IS 42. uct''; t LAVA. c.k C4-4.,Vel•A
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
KLB:kkb
‘,‘ 1-•• 6e. loci-) 5
tLQ
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452-1850
mommi
.- '• M
AAAAAAA
City of
Mendota Heights
January 28, 1991
Ms. S. Pentel
556 Fremont Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Pentel:
Your application for a Ck)eloklAc--12-'
will be
considered by the City Council at their next regularly scheduled
meeting, which will beheld on Tuesday, cc.(0. . The
Council meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M. here at City Hall in
the Council Chambers. You, or a representative, should plan on
attending the meeting, in order that your application will receive
Council consideration.
Zlanning Commission
(-etc res 4-69
0 s t -r u
recommended i(A04- Gurtcc(
Vek-v-ca_v‘Le.-
+r) t
-4L -1
k
fr-1.4.4- •
yo (.3 C CccS.e. Li IS 42. uct''; t LAVA. c.k C4-4.,Vel•A
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
KLB:kkb
‘,‘ 1-•• 6e. loci-) 5
tLQ
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452-1850
January 16, 1991
Ms. S. Pentel
556 Fremont
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Pentel:
Your application for a Uar-to.V1C.Q will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, c„Ict.i/A. 22( 11.cr
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452-1850
January 16, 1991
Ms. S. Pentel
556 Fremont
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Ms. Pentel:
Your application for a Uar-to.V1C.Q will be
considered by the Planning Commission at their next regularly
scheduled meeting, which will be held on Tuesday, c„Ict.i/A. 22( 11.cr
The Planning Commission meeting starts at 7:30 o'clock P.M., here
at the City Hall in the Council Chambers. You, or a representative
should plan on attending the meeting, in order that your
application will receive Commission consideration.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Batchelder
Administrative Assistant
KLB:kkb
1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN - 55118 452-1850
Antenna Height and Communications Effectiveness
Exhibit
By Gerald L. Hall, K1TD
Associate Technical Editor
The purpose of this paper is to provide general
information about communications effectiveness as
related to the physical height of antennas. The
performance of horizontal antennas at heights of 35 and
70 feet is examined in detail. Vertical arrays are not
considered here because at short-wave frequencies,
over average terrain and at low radiation angles, they
are less effective than are horizontal antennas.
Ionospheric Propagation
Frequencies between 3 and 30 megahertz (ab-
breviated MHz) are often called the "short-wave" bands.
In engineering terms this range of frequencies is defined
as the high -frequency or HF portion of the radio
spectrum. HF radio communications between two points
that are separated by distances of more than about
15 to 25 miles depend almost solely upon propagation
of radio signals through the ionosphere. The ionosphere
is a region of the earth's upper atmosphere which is
ionized by ultraviolet rays received from the sun.
The ionosphere has the property that it will refract
or bend radio waves which pass through it. However,
the ionosphere is not one single "blanket" of ionization.
Instead, for reasons not fully understood, a few discrete
layers are formed at different heights above the earth.
From the standpoint of radio propagation, each ionized
layer has distinctive characteristics, related primarily to
different amounts of ionization in the various layers. The
ionized layer which is most useful for HF radio com-
munications is called the F layer.
The F layer exists at heights varying from approxi-
mately 130 to 260 miles above the earth's surface. Both
the layer height and the amount of ionization depend
upon the latitude from the equator, the time of day, the
season of the year, and upon the level of sunspot activity.
Sunspot activity varies generally in cycles that are
approximately 11 years in duration, although short-term
bursts of activity may create changes in propagation
conditions that last for less than an hour. The ionosphere
is not homogeneous, and is undergoing continual
change. The F layer disappears at night in periods of
low and medium solar activity, as the ultraviolet energy
required to sustain ionization is no longer received from
the sun. The amount of bending that will be imparted
to a passing radio wave is related directly to the intensity
of ionization in this layer, and to the frequency of the
radio wave.
A triangle may thus be used to portray the cross-
sectional path of ionospheric radio -wave travel, as shown
in Fin 1 Tha haca nf tha triannla is tha curfara nf tha
IONOSPHERIC
P- LAYER
•
TRANSMITTER
RECEIVER
'/1 i ii i /////f/f/////iii/1/I/I/»////f/I/f
EARTH
Fig 1—A simplified cross-sectional representation of
ionospheric propagation. Typically the F layer exists at
a height of 150 miles above the earth at mid -latitudes.
The distance between the transmitter and the receiver
may range from a few miles to 2500 miles under
normal conditions.
earth between two distant points, and the apex of the
triangle is the point which represents refraction in the
ionosphere. If all the necessary conditions are met, the
radio wave will travel from the first point on the earth's
surface to the ionosphere, where it will be bent suf-
ficiently to travel to the second point on the earth, many
hundreds of miles away.
Of course the earth's surface is not a flat plane, but
instead is curved. High -frequency radio waves behave
in essentially the same manner as light waves—they
tend to travel in straight lines, but with a slight amount
of downward bending caused by refraction in the air. For
this reason it is not possible to communicate by a direct
path over distances greater than about 15 to 25 miles
in this frequency range. The curvature of the earth
causes the surface to "fall away" from the path of the
radio wave with greater distances. Therefore, it is the
ionosphere that permits HF radio communication to be
made between points separated by thousands of miles.
The range of frequencies from 3 to 30 MHz is unique
in this respect, as ionospheric propagation is not
consistently supported for any frequencies outside this
range.
One of the necessary conditions for ionospheric
communications is that the radio wave must encounter
the ionosphere at the correct angle. This is illustrated
in Fig 2. Radio waves which leave the earth at high
angles above the horizon may receive only very slight
bending, and are then lost:to outer space. For the same
fixed frequency of operation, as the radiation angle is
lowered toward the horizon, a point is reached where
tha hart/Jinn of tha wavy is ciiffiriant to rat.lrn tha wave
Antenna Height and Communications Effectiveness
Exhibit
By Gerald L. Hall, K1TD
Associate Technical Editor
The purpose of this paper is to provide general
information about communications effectiveness as
related to the physical height of antennas. The
performance of horizontal antennas at heights of 35 and
70 feet is examined in detail. Vertical arrays are not
considered here because at short-wave frequencies,
over average terrain and at low radiation angles, they
are less effective than are horizontal antennas.
Ionospheric Propagation
Frequencies between 3 and 30 megahertz (ab-
breviated MHz) are often called the "short-wave" bands.
In engineering terms this range of frequencies is defined
as the high -frequency or HF portion of the radio
spectrum. HF radio communications between two points
that are separated by distances of more than about
15 to 25 miles depend almost solely upon propagation
of radio signals through the ionosphere. The ionosphere
is a region of the earth's upper atmosphere which is
ionized by ultraviolet rays received from the sun.
The ionosphere has the property that it will refract
or bend radio waves which pass through it. However,
the ionosphere is not one single "blanket" of ionization.
Instead, for reasons not fully understood, a few discrete
layers are formed at different heights above the earth.
From the standpoint of radio propagation, each ionized
layer has distinctive characteristics, related primarily to
different amounts of ionization in the various layers. The
ionized layer which is most useful for HF radio com-
munications is called the F layer.
The F layer exists at heights varying from approxi-
mately 130 to 260 miles above the earth's surface. Both
the layer height and the amount of ionization depend
upon the latitude from the equator, the time of day, the
season of the year, and upon the level of sunspot activity.
Sunspot activity varies generally in cycles that are
approximately 11 years in duration, although short-term
bursts of activity may create changes in propagation
conditions that last for less than an hour. The ionosphere
is not homogeneous, and is undergoing continual
change. The F layer disappears at night in periods of
low and medium solar activity, as the ultraviolet energy
required to sustain ionization is no longer received from
the sun. The amount of bending that will be imparted
to a passing radio wave is related directly to the intensity
of ionization in this layer, and to the frequency of the
radio wave.
A triangle may thus be used to portray the cross-
sectional path of ionospheric radio -wave travel, as shown
in Fin 1 Tha haca nf tha triannla is tha curfara nf tha
IONOSPHERIC
P- LAYER
•
TRANSMITTER
RECEIVER
'/1 i ii i /////f/f/////iii/1/I/I/»////f/I/f
EARTH
Fig 1—A simplified cross-sectional representation of
ionospheric propagation. Typically the F layer exists at
a height of 150 miles above the earth at mid -latitudes.
The distance between the transmitter and the receiver
may range from a few miles to 2500 miles under
normal conditions.
earth between two distant points, and the apex of the
triangle is the point which represents refraction in the
ionosphere. If all the necessary conditions are met, the
radio wave will travel from the first point on the earth's
surface to the ionosphere, where it will be bent suf-
ficiently to travel to the second point on the earth, many
hundreds of miles away.
Of course the earth's surface is not a flat plane, but
instead is curved. High -frequency radio waves behave
in essentially the same manner as light waves—they
tend to travel in straight lines, but with a slight amount
of downward bending caused by refraction in the air. For
this reason it is not possible to communicate by a direct
path over distances greater than about 15 to 25 miles
in this frequency range. The curvature of the earth
causes the surface to "fall away" from the path of the
radio wave with greater distances. Therefore, it is the
ionosphere that permits HF radio communication to be
made between points separated by thousands of miles.
The range of frequencies from 3 to 30 MHz is unique
in this respect, as ionospheric propagation is not
consistently supported for any frequencies outside this
range.
One of the necessary conditions for ionospheric
communications is that the radio wave must encounter
the ionosphere at the correct angle. This is illustrated
in Fig 2. Radio waves which leave the earth at high
angles above the horizon may receive only very slight
bending, and are then lost:to outer space. For the same
fixed frequency of operation, as the radiation angle is
lowered toward the horizon, a point is reached where
tha hart/Jinn of tha wavy is ciiffiriant to rat.lrn tha wave
IONIZED LAYER
CRITICAL
ANGLE
TRANSMITTER
EARTH
Fig 2—Behavior of radio waves encountering the ionosphere. Rays entering the ionized region at angles above the
critical angle are not bent enough to be returned to earth, and are lost to space. Waves entering at angles below
the critical angle reach the earth at increasingly greater distances as the angle approaches the horizontal. The
maximum distance that may normally be covered in a single hop is 2500 miles. Greater distances may be covered
with multiple hops.
to the earth. At successively lower angles, the wave
returns to the earth at increasing distances.
If the radio wave leaves the earth at a radiation angle
of zero degrees, just toward the horizon (or just tangent
to the earth's surface), the maximum distance that may
be reached under usual ionospheric conditions is
approximately 2500 miles (4000 kilometers). However,
the earth itself acts as a reflector of radio waves. Quite
often a radio signal will be reflected from the reception
point on the earth into the ionosphere again, reaching
the earth a second time at a still more distant point.
As in the case of light waves, the angle of reflection
is the same as the angle of incidence, so a wave striking
the surface of the earth at an angle of, say, 15° is
reflected upward from the surface at the same angle.
Thus, the distance to the second point of reception will
be approximately twice the distance of the first. This
effect is also illustrated in Fig 2, where the signal travels
from the transmitter at the left of the drawing via the
ionosphere to Point A, in the center of the drawing. From
Point A the signal travels via the ionosphere again to
Point B, at the right. Signal travel from the earth through
the ionosphere and back to the earth is called a hop.
Under some conditions it is possible for as many as four
or five signal hops to occur over a radio path, but no"more
than two or three hops is the norm. In this way, HF
communications can be conducted over thousands of
miles.
With regard to signal hopping, two important points
should be recognized. First, a significant loss of signal
occurs with each hop. Lower layers of the ionosphere
absorb energy from the signals as they pass through,
and the ionosphere tends to scatter the radio energy in
various directions, rather than confining it in a tight
bundle. The earth also scatters the energy at a reflection
point. Thus, only a small fraction of the transmitted
energy reaches a distant receiving point.
Again refer to Fig 2. Two radio paths (heavy lines)
are shown from the transmitter to Point B, a 1 -hop path
and a 2 -hop path. Measurements indicate that although
there can be great variation in the ratio of the two signal
strengths in a situation such as this, the signal power
received at Point B will generally be from five to ten times
greater for the 1 -hop wave than for the 2 -hop wave. (The
terrain at the mid -path reflection point for the 2 -hop wave,
the angle at which the wave is reflected from the earth,
and the condition of the ionosphere in the vicinity of all
the refraction points are the primary factors in
• determining the signal -strength ratio.) Signal levels are
generally compared in decibels, abbreviated dB. The
decibel is a logarithmic unit. Three decibels difference
in signal strengths is equivalent to a power ratio of 2:1;
a difference of 10 dB equates to a power ratio of 10:1.
Thus, the signal Toss for an additional hop is about 7 to
10 dB.
The additional loss per hop becomes significant at
greater distances. For a simplified example, a distance
of 4000 miles can be covered in 2 hops of 2000 miles
each or in four hops of 1000 miles each. For illustration,
assume the loss for additional hops is 10 dB, or a 1/10
power ratio. Under such conditions, the 4 -hop signal will
be received with only 1/100 the power or 20 dB beta
that received in two hops. The reason for this is that on
1/10 of.the 2 -hop signal is received for the first additional
(3rd) hop, and only 1/10 of that 1/10 for the second
additional (4th) hop. It is for this reason that no more than
four or five propagation hops are useful; the received
signal becomes too weak to be heard:
IONIZED LAYER
CRITICAL
ANGLE
TRANSMITTER
EARTH
Fig 2—Behavior of radio waves encountering the ionosphere. Rays entering the ionized region at angles above the
critical angle are not bent enough to be returned to earth, and are lost to space. Waves entering at angles below
the critical angle reach the earth at increasingly greater distances as the angle approaches the horizontal. The
maximum distance that may normally be covered in a single hop is 2500 miles. Greater distances may be covered
with multiple hops.
to the earth. At successively lower angles, the wave
returns to the earth at increasing distances.
If the radio wave leaves the earth at a radiation angle
of zero degrees, just toward the horizon (or just tangent
to the earth's surface), the maximum distance that may
be reached under usual ionospheric conditions is
approximately 2500 miles (4000 kilometers). However,
the earth itself acts as a reflector of radio waves. Quite
often a radio signal will be reflected from the reception
point on the earth into the ionosphere again, reaching
the earth a second time at a still more distant point.
As in the case of light waves, the angle of reflection
is the same as the angle of incidence, so a wave striking
the surface of the earth at an angle of, say, 15° is
reflected upward from the surface at the same angle.
Thus, the distance to the second point of reception will
be approximately twice the distance of the first. This
effect is also illustrated in Fig 2, where the signal travels
from the transmitter at the left of the drawing via the
ionosphere to Point A, in the center of the drawing. From
Point A the signal travels via the ionosphere again to
Point B, at the right. Signal travel from the earth through
the ionosphere and back to the earth is called a hop.
Under some conditions it is possible for as many as four
or five signal hops to occur over a radio path, but no"more
than two or three hops is the norm. In this way, HF
communications can be conducted over thousands of
miles.
With regard to signal hopping, two important points
should be recognized. First, a significant loss of signal
occurs with each hop. Lower layers of the ionosphere
absorb energy from the signals as they pass through,
and the ionosphere tends to scatter the radio energy in
various directions, rather than confining it in a tight
bundle. The earth also scatters the energy at a reflection
point. Thus, only a small fraction of the transmitted
energy reaches a distant receiving point.
Again refer to Fig 2. Two radio paths (heavy lines)
are shown from the transmitter to Point B, a 1 -hop path
and a 2 -hop path. Measurements indicate that although
there can be great variation in the ratio of the two signal
strengths in a situation such as this, the signal power
received at Point B will generally be from five to ten times
greater for the 1 -hop wave than for the 2 -hop wave. (The
terrain at the mid -path reflection point for the 2 -hop wave,
the angle at which the wave is reflected from the earth,
and the condition of the ionosphere in the vicinity of all
the refraction points are the primary factors in
• determining the signal -strength ratio.) Signal levels are
generally compared in decibels, abbreviated dB. The
decibel is a logarithmic unit. Three decibels difference
in signal strengths is equivalent to a power ratio of 2:1;
a difference of 10 dB equates to a power ratio of 10:1.
Thus, the signal Toss for an additional hop is about 7 to
10 dB.
The additional loss per hop becomes significant at
greater distances. For a simplified example, a distance
of 4000 miles can be covered in 2 hops of 2000 miles
each or in four hops of 1000 miles each. For illustration,
assume the loss for additional hops is 10 dB, or a 1/10
power ratio. Under such conditions, the 4 -hop signal will
be received with only 1/100 the power or 20 dB beta
that received in two hops. The reason for this is that on
1/10 of.the 2 -hop signal is received for the first additional
(3rd) hop, and only 1/10 of that 1/10 for the second
additional (4th) hop. It is for this reason that no more than
four or five propagation hops are useful; the received
signal becomes too weak to be heard:
90
70
60
50
40
w30
z
010
z 9
4 9
7
6
RADIATION
5
4
3
2
■ moo
Si
■iwite
INIMi
It\
9,111110li111•111111011iti11111
atviam
11110019.1111
iniK.irmi
_,_IIIIN
r A��%,�./ii.,..
REGION
",
'` 4A/0,
mm
im
MIA.,aRttt�u.
Y�
marliA
l
Mimi
M1.
H•62
ML°
H•131
I
MI.
H•71.5
0
500 1000 1500 2000
SINGLE HOP DISTANCE
MI.X1.609•k2
2500
MILES
z
O
0
w
co
J
Fig 3—Distance plotted against wave angle (one -hop
transmission) for the nominal range of virtual heights
for the E and F2 layers, and for the F1 layer.
The second important point to be recognized in
multihop propagation is that the trigonometry of the first
hop generally establishes the trigonometry for all
succeeding hops. And it is the radiation angle at the
transmitter which sets up the trigonometry for the first
hop. Solving a propagation triangle is simplified with the
aid of the graph in Fig 3.' In this graph the radiation angle
in degrees is given on the left, and the single -hop
disiance for the effective layer height along the bottom.
Table 1 shows the optimum propagation distance for
various radiation angles. The data for this table was read
from the graph of Fig 3, based on an assumed F -layer
height of 131 miles.
From Table 1, if the radiation angle from a given
transmitting antenna is concentrated at 30°, the first and
succeeding hops in radio propagation will span about
650 miles each. With a usable maximum limit of five hops
under the best of conditions, one can project that
the greatest distance for optimum communications for
a 30° wave angle is five times 650 miles, or 3250 miles.
For effective communications over greater distances, it
would be necessary to lower the radiation angle at the
transmitter antenna site. As will be discussed shortly, this
can be done only by increasing the height of the hori-
zontal transmitting antenna.
Although the discussion in the preceding para-
graphs has been in terms of a transmitting antenna, the
same principles apply when the antenna is used for
reception. A high antenna will receive low -angle signals
more effectively than will a low antenna. The point of
these several paragraphs may be summarized briefly:
The vertical angle of radiation is the key factor in
determining effective communications distances
beyond line of sight.
Table 1—Propagation
Radiation Angle
(Data extracted from
Radiation
Angle,
Degrees
2
4
8
10
15
20
30
40
Distance versus
Fig 3)
Optimum
Propagation
Distance, Miles
2250
2100
1650
1500 -
1200
1000
650
450
Scientists and engineers recognize that modes
other than signal hopping account for the propagation
of radio waves_ over thousands of miles. However,
studies of actual radio propagation in which the writer
has participated have displayed signals with as many as
5 hops, so the hopping mode is one distinct possibility.2
Whatever the propagation mode, there is unanimous
agreement that the most effective communications at HF
most often accompany the lowest radiation angle.
Horizontal Antennas
A simple antenna that is commonly used for HF
communications is the horizontal half -wave dipole. The
dipole is a straight length of wire (or tubing) into which
radio-frequency energy is fed at the center. Because of
its simplicity, the dipole may be easily subjected to
theoretical performance analyses. Further, the results
of proper analyses are borne out in practice. For these
reasons, the half -wave dipole becomes a convenient
performance standard against which other antenna
systems can be compared. The dipole antenna, when
viewed from one end, radiates an equal amount of power
in all directions.
Because the earth acts as a reflector for HF radio
• waves, the directive properties of any antenna are
modified considerably by the earth underneath it. If a
dipole antenna is placed horizontally above the earth,
most of the energy radiated downward from the dipole
is reflected upward. The reflected waves combine with
the direct waves (those radiated at angles above the
horizontal) in various ways, depending on the height of
the antenna, the frequency, and the electrical character-
istics of the ground under and around the antenna.
At some vertical angles above the horizon, the direct
and reflected waves may be exactly in phase—that is,
the maximum signal or field strengths of both waves are
reached at the same instant at some distant point. In this
1From The ARRL Antenna Book, 14th edition, Chapter 1, Fig 12.
2HF backscatter studies by Raytheon Company under contract
with Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB, NY. A part
of this study was done at Raytheon's South Dartmouth,
Mass. field site, Jan -Jun, 1960.
90
70
60
50
40
w30
z
010
z 9
4 9
7
6
RADIATION
5
4
3
2
■ moo
Si
■iwite
INIMi
It\
9,111110li111•111111011iti11111
atviam
11110019.1111
iniK.irmi
_,_IIIIN
r A��%,�./ii.,..
REGION
",
'` 4A/0,
mm
im
MIA.,aRttt�u.
Y�
marliA
l
Mimi
M1.
H•62
ML°
H•131
I
MI.
H•71.5
0
500 1000 1500 2000
SINGLE HOP DISTANCE
MI.X1.609•k2
2500
MILES
z
O
0
w
co
J
Fig 3—Distance plotted against wave angle (one -hop
transmission) for the nominal range of virtual heights
for the E and F2 layers, and for the F1 layer.
The second important point to be recognized in
multihop propagation is that the trigonometry of the first
hop generally establishes the trigonometry for all
succeeding hops. And it is the radiation angle at the
transmitter which sets up the trigonometry for the first
hop. Solving a propagation triangle is simplified with the
aid of the graph in Fig 3.' In this graph the radiation angle
in degrees is given on the left, and the single -hop
disiance for the effective layer height along the bottom.
Table 1 shows the optimum propagation distance for
various radiation angles. The data for this table was read
from the graph of Fig 3, based on an assumed F -layer
height of 131 miles.
From Table 1, if the radiation angle from a given
transmitting antenna is concentrated at 30°, the first and
succeeding hops in radio propagation will span about
650 miles each. With a usable maximum limit of five hops
under the best of conditions, one can project that
the greatest distance for optimum communications for
a 30° wave angle is five times 650 miles, or 3250 miles.
For effective communications over greater distances, it
would be necessary to lower the radiation angle at the
transmitter antenna site. As will be discussed shortly, this
can be done only by increasing the height of the hori-
zontal transmitting antenna.
Although the discussion in the preceding para-
graphs has been in terms of a transmitting antenna, the
same principles apply when the antenna is used for
reception. A high antenna will receive low -angle signals
more effectively than will a low antenna. The point of
these several paragraphs may be summarized briefly:
The vertical angle of radiation is the key factor in
determining effective communications distances
beyond line of sight.
Table 1—Propagation
Radiation Angle
(Data extracted from
Radiation
Angle,
Degrees
2
4
8
10
15
20
30
40
Distance versus
Fig 3)
Optimum
Propagation
Distance, Miles
2250
2100
1650
1500 -
1200
1000
650
450
Scientists and engineers recognize that modes
other than signal hopping account for the propagation
of radio waves_ over thousands of miles. However,
studies of actual radio propagation in which the writer
has participated have displayed signals with as many as
5 hops, so the hopping mode is one distinct possibility.2
Whatever the propagation mode, there is unanimous
agreement that the most effective communications at HF
most often accompany the lowest radiation angle.
Horizontal Antennas
A simple antenna that is commonly used for HF
communications is the horizontal half -wave dipole. The
dipole is a straight length of wire (or tubing) into which
radio-frequency energy is fed at the center. Because of
its simplicity, the dipole may be easily subjected to
theoretical performance analyses. Further, the results
of proper analyses are borne out in practice. For these
reasons, the half -wave dipole becomes a convenient
performance standard against which other antenna
systems can be compared. The dipole antenna, when
viewed from one end, radiates an equal amount of power
in all directions.
Because the earth acts as a reflector for HF radio
• waves, the directive properties of any antenna are
modified considerably by the earth underneath it. If a
dipole antenna is placed horizontally above the earth,
most of the energy radiated downward from the dipole
is reflected upward. The reflected waves combine with
the direct waves (those radiated at angles above the
horizontal) in various ways, depending on the height of
the antenna, the frequency, and the electrical character-
istics of the ground under and around the antenna.
At some vertical angles above the horizon, the direct
and reflected waves may be exactly in phase—that is,
the maximum signal or field strengths of both waves are
reached at the same instant at some distant point. In this
1From The ARRL Antenna Book, 14th edition, Chapter 1, Fig 12.
2HF backscatter studies by Raytheon Company under contract
with Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB, NY. A part
of this study was done at Raytheon's South Dartmouth,
Mass. field site, Jan -Jun, 1960.
90
Fig 4—Elevation-plane pattern for a horizontal dipole at
a height of Va wavelength (solid line) and in free space
(broken line).
90
Fig 5—Elevation-plane pattern for a horizontal dipole at
a height of 1 wavelength (solid line) and in free space
(broken line).
case the resultant field strength is equal to the sum of
the two components. At other vertical angles the two
waves may be completely out of phase at some distant
point—that is, the fields are maximum at the same
instant but the phase directions are opposite. The
resultant field strength in this case is the difference
between the two. At still other angles the resultant field
will have intermediate values. Thus, the effect of the
ground is to increase the intensity of radiation at some
vertical angles and to decrease it at others. The elevation
angles at which the maxima and minima occur depend
primarily on the antenna height above ground. (The
electrical characteristics of the ground have some slight
effect.)
If the earth is considered to be a perfect reflector,
straightforward trigonometric calculations can be made
to determine the relative amount of radiation intensity
at any vertical angle for any dipole height. Graphs from
such calculations may be plotted as circular or polar
diagrams, called radiation patterns. Fig 4 shows the
vertical radiation pattern for a dipole antenna positioned
one-half wavelength above the ground, viewed from one
end, and Fig 5 for:a height of one wavelength. The
radiation from the dipole if in free space is shown by the
broken lines, and appear as semi -circles.
In the plots of Figs 4 and 5, the radiation angle
Table 2—Electrical Heights For Amateur Bands
below 30 MHz
Frequency
1.8 MHz
3.5
7.0
10.1
14.0
18.1
21.0
24.9
28.0
35 feet
physical
height
0.06 wavelength
0.12
0.25
0.36
0.50
0.64
0.75
0.89
1.00
70 feet
physical
height
0.13 wavelength
0.25
0.50
0.72
1.00
1.29
1.49
1.77
1.99
above the horizon is represented in the same fashion
that angles are measured on a protractor. The concentric
circles are calibrated to represent ratios of field
strengths, referenced to the strength represented by the
outer circle. The circles are calibrated in decibels.
Diminishing strengths are plotted toward the center.
Antenna heights are usually discussed in terms of
wavelengths. The reason for this is that the length of a
radio wave is inversely proportional to its frequency.
Therefore a fixed physical height will represent different
electrical heights at different radio frequencies. For
example, a height of 70 feet represents one wavelength
at a frequency of 14 MHz. But the same 70 -foot height
represents only 1/2 wavelength for a frequency of 7 MHz.
For physical antenna heights of 35 and 70 feet, Table
2 shows the electrical heights in wavelengths for all the
amateur bands below 30 MHz.
The lobes and nulls of the pattern of Figs 4 and 5
illustrate what was described earlier, that the effect of
the earth beneath the antenna is to increase the intensity
of radiation at some vertical angles and to decrease it
at others. At a height of 1/2 wavelength (Fig 4), the
radiated energy is strongest at a radiation angle of 30°,
an angle which was determined earlier to provide a
maximum effective communications distance of about
3250 miles under the conditions assumed. The pattem
of Fig 4 represents the radiation from a dipole for 14 MHz
at a height of 35 feet.
As the horizontal antenna is raised to even greater
heights, additional lobes are formed, and those that exist
move closer to the horizon. But yet the maximum
amplitude of the existing lobes is not diminished. As
may be seen from Fig 5, for an antenna height of
1 wavelength, the energy in the lower lobes is strongest
at 15°. And Table 1indicates that the optimum
propagation distance per hop for 15° is 1200 miles.
Under the very same conditions as before, 5 -hop
propagation, one may see that the greatest distance fo
optimum communication now is 5 x 1200 or 6000 miles.
The pattern of Fig 5 represents a 14 -MHz dipole at a
height of 70 feet. Thus, for the conditions assumed, the
optimum communications distance has been extended
from 3250 miles to 6000 miles, merely by raising the
90
Fig 4—Elevation-plane pattern for a horizontal dipole at
a height of Va wavelength (solid line) and in free space
(broken line).
90
Fig 5—Elevation-plane pattern for a horizontal dipole at
a height of 1 wavelength (solid line) and in free space
(broken line).
case the resultant field strength is equal to the sum of
the two components. At other vertical angles the two
waves may be completely out of phase at some distant
point—that is, the fields are maximum at the same
instant but the phase directions are opposite. The
resultant field strength in this case is the difference
between the two. At still other angles the resultant field
will have intermediate values. Thus, the effect of the
ground is to increase the intensity of radiation at some
vertical angles and to decrease it at others. The elevation
angles at which the maxima and minima occur depend
primarily on the antenna height above ground. (The
electrical characteristics of the ground have some slight
effect.)
If the earth is considered to be a perfect reflector,
straightforward trigonometric calculations can be made
to determine the relative amount of radiation intensity
at any vertical angle for any dipole height. Graphs from
such calculations may be plotted as circular or polar
diagrams, called radiation patterns. Fig 4 shows the
vertical radiation pattern for a dipole antenna positioned
one-half wavelength above the ground, viewed from one
end, and Fig 5 for:a height of one wavelength. The
radiation from the dipole if in free space is shown by the
broken lines, and appear as semi -circles.
In the plots of Figs 4 and 5, the radiation angle
Table 2—Electrical Heights For Amateur Bands
below 30 MHz
Frequency
1.8 MHz
3.5
7.0
10.1
14.0
18.1
21.0
24.9
28.0
35 feet
physical
height
0.06 wavelength
0.12
0.25
0.36
0.50
0.64
0.75
0.89
1.00
70 feet
physical
height
0.13 wavelength
0.25
0.50
0.72
1.00
1.29
1.49
1.77
1.99
above the horizon is represented in the same fashion
that angles are measured on a protractor. The concentric
circles are calibrated to represent ratios of field
strengths, referenced to the strength represented by the
outer circle. The circles are calibrated in decibels.
Diminishing strengths are plotted toward the center.
Antenna heights are usually discussed in terms of
wavelengths. The reason for this is that the length of a
radio wave is inversely proportional to its frequency.
Therefore a fixed physical height will represent different
electrical heights at different radio frequencies. For
example, a height of 70 feet represents one wavelength
at a frequency of 14 MHz. But the same 70 -foot height
represents only 1/2 wavelength for a frequency of 7 MHz.
For physical antenna heights of 35 and 70 feet, Table
2 shows the electrical heights in wavelengths for all the
amateur bands below 30 MHz.
The lobes and nulls of the pattern of Figs 4 and 5
illustrate what was described earlier, that the effect of
the earth beneath the antenna is to increase the intensity
of radiation at some vertical angles and to decrease it
at others. At a height of 1/2 wavelength (Fig 4), the
radiated energy is strongest at a radiation angle of 30°,
an angle which was determined earlier to provide a
maximum effective communications distance of about
3250 miles under the conditions assumed. The pattem
of Fig 4 represents the radiation from a dipole for 14 MHz
at a height of 35 feet.
As the horizontal antenna is raised to even greater
heights, additional lobes are formed, and those that exist
move closer to the horizon. But yet the maximum
amplitude of the existing lobes is not diminished. As
may be seen from Fig 5, for an antenna height of
1 wavelength, the energy in the lower lobes is strongest
at 15°. And Table 1indicates that the optimum
propagation distance per hop for 15° is 1200 miles.
Under the very same conditions as before, 5 -hop
propagation, one may see that the greatest distance fo
optimum communication now is 5 x 1200 or 6000 miles.
The pattern of Fig 5 represents a 14 -MHz dipole at a
height of 70 feet. Thus, for the conditions assumed, the
optimum communications distance has been extended
from 3250 miles to 6000 miles, merely by raising the
. ' •
antenna from 35 to 70 feet. Even greater heights would
provide still greater communications distances under the
same conditions.
The radiation angle of the lowest lobe for a hori-
zontal antenna above the ground may be determined
mathematically:
0 = sin -1
where
the wave angle or radiation angle
h = the antenna height above ground in
wavelengths (see Table 2)
In short, the higher the horizontal antenna, the lower
is the lowest lobe of the pattern. Therefore, the higher
an HF antenna can be placed, the farther it will provide
effective communications because of the resulting lower
radiation angle. This is true for any horizontal antenna.
Electrical Characteristics of HF Antennas
As mentioned previously, a dipole antenna, when
viewed from one end of the conductor, radiates an equal
amount of power in all directions. The plotted radiation
pattern is a perfect circle. If the dipole is vertical, this
circle represents the azimuth coverage, with an equal
amount of power radiated in every compass direction.
For point-to-point communications, however, it is bene-
ficial to concentrate the radiated energy into a beam
which is aimed toward a single distant point. An analogy
can be made by comparing the light emanating from a
bare electric lamp to that from an automobile headlight.
For illuminating a distant point, the headlight is far more
effective.
Antennas designed to concentrate the radiated
energy into a beam are called beam antennas. For a
fixed amount of transmitter power fed to the transmitting
antenna, beam antennas provide increased signal
strength at a distant receiver. In radio communications,
the use of a beam antenna is also beneficial during
reception, because the antenna pattern for transmission
is the same as for reception. A beam antenna helps to
reject signals from unwanted directions, and in effect
boosts the strength of signals received from the desired
direction.
• The increase in signal or field strength which a beam
antenna offers is frequently referenced to a dipole
antenna by a term called gain. Gain is commonly
expressed in decibels. One type of beam antenna is a
Yagi, named after one of its Japanese inventors.
Different varieties of Yagi antennas exist, each having
somewhat different characteristics. Many antennas
erected for television reception are a form of multi -
element Yagi beam.
Subsequent discussions in this paper refer to a
3 -element Yagi array, one having a driven element, a
parasitic director and a parasitic reflector. The parasitic
elements are not fed any power directly; instead they are
excited through mutual coupling to the driven element,
and in turn also radiate power. Each parasitic element
is spaced 0.2 wavelength from the driven element, and
270
0
0
Fig 6—Computer-calculated azimuth -plane radiation
pattern for a horizontal 3 -element Yagi array (solid
line), and for a comparison dipole (broken line).
Fig 7—Computer-calculated elevation -plane or vertical -
profile pattern of a horizontal Yagi array, solid line, and
for a comparison dipole, broken line. These patterns
are those seen from the ends of the elements with the
antennas In free space.
the theoretical gain of this array, determined through
computer analysis, is 7.2 dB over a dipole. This means
that for the same transmitter power, the effective radiated
power of the Yagi in its favored direction is 5.2 times that
of the dipole in the same direction. The theoretical front -
to -back ratio of the Yagi antenna is 12 dB, meaning the
power radiated in its forward direction is 15.7 times that
radiated in the opposite direction. Values for a practical
antenna of this type are quite close to theoretical.
Computer -calculated radiation patterns for the
horizontal Yagi array are presented in Figs 6 and 7.
Fig 6 shows the azimuth plane, the response in various
. ' •
antenna from 35 to 70 feet. Even greater heights would
provide still greater communications distances under the
same conditions.
The radiation angle of the lowest lobe for a hori-
zontal antenna above the ground may be determined
mathematically:
0 = sin -1
where
the wave angle or radiation angle
h = the antenna height above ground in
wavelengths (see Table 2)
In short, the higher the horizontal antenna, the lower
is the lowest lobe of the pattern. Therefore, the higher
an HF antenna can be placed, the farther it will provide
effective communications because of the resulting lower
radiation angle. This is true for any horizontal antenna.
Electrical Characteristics of HF Antennas
As mentioned previously, a dipole antenna, when
viewed from one end of the conductor, radiates an equal
amount of power in all directions. The plotted radiation
pattern is a perfect circle. If the dipole is vertical, this
circle represents the azimuth coverage, with an equal
amount of power radiated in every compass direction.
For point-to-point communications, however, it is bene-
ficial to concentrate the radiated energy into a beam
which is aimed toward a single distant point. An analogy
can be made by comparing the light emanating from a
bare electric lamp to that from an automobile headlight.
For illuminating a distant point, the headlight is far more
effective.
Antennas designed to concentrate the radiated
energy into a beam are called beam antennas. For a
fixed amount of transmitter power fed to the transmitting
antenna, beam antennas provide increased signal
strength at a distant receiver. In radio communications,
the use of a beam antenna is also beneficial during
reception, because the antenna pattern for transmission
is the same as for reception. A beam antenna helps to
reject signals from unwanted directions, and in effect
boosts the strength of signals received from the desired
direction.
• The increase in signal or field strength which a beam
antenna offers is frequently referenced to a dipole
antenna by a term called gain. Gain is commonly
expressed in decibels. One type of beam antenna is a
Yagi, named after one of its Japanese inventors.
Different varieties of Yagi antennas exist, each having
somewhat different characteristics. Many antennas
erected for television reception are a form of multi -
element Yagi beam.
Subsequent discussions in this paper refer to a
3 -element Yagi array, one having a driven element, a
parasitic director and a parasitic reflector. The parasitic
elements are not fed any power directly; instead they are
excited through mutual coupling to the driven element,
and in turn also radiate power. Each parasitic element
is spaced 0.2 wavelength from the driven element, and
270
0
0
Fig 6—Computer-calculated azimuth -plane radiation
pattern for a horizontal 3 -element Yagi array (solid
line), and for a comparison dipole (broken line).
Fig 7—Computer-calculated elevation -plane or vertical -
profile pattern of a horizontal Yagi array, solid line, and
for a comparison dipole, broken line. These patterns
are those seen from the ends of the elements with the
antennas In free space.
the theoretical gain of this array, determined through
computer analysis, is 7.2 dB over a dipole. This means
that for the same transmitter power, the effective radiated
power of the Yagi in its favored direction is 5.2 times that
of the dipole in the same direction. The theoretical front -
to -back ratio of the Yagi antenna is 12 dB, meaning the
power radiated in its forward direction is 15.7 times that
radiated in the opposite direction. Values for a practical
antenna of this type are quite close to theoretical.
Computer -calculated radiation patterns for the
horizontal Yagi array are presented in Figs 6 and 7.
Fig 6 shows the azimuth plane, the response in various
compass directions, as a solid line. The broken line in
Fig 6 shows the pattern of a half -wavelength dipole, for
comparison. Fig 7 shows the elevation plane or vertical -
profile pattern. This pattern is that seen from the ends
of the elements, with the antenna in free space. The solid
line again represents the Yagi, and the broken line the
dipole, that "perfect circle" which was mentioned earlier.
Performance of most other Yagi-type arrays with three
or four elements will not be significantly different from
the patterns shown here.
Another often -used type of beam antenna is the
quad array. Typically, a quad is constructed with two or
more wire elements in the form of a square or a diamond.
The conducting wires are usually supported by X-shaped
frames of wood or fiberglass material. For the same
number of elements and spacing, the performance of a
quad beam is generally similar to that of a Yagi beam.
The vertical patterns of Figs 4 and 5 were calculated
by assuming the earth is a perfect reflector, an unrealistic
situation. Actual earth does not reflect all of the radio-
frequency energy striking it; some absorption takes
place. Over real earth, therefore, the patterns will be
slightly different, depending upon the electrical con-
ductivity and dielectric constant of the soil, and upon the
radio frequency. Computer programs are available to
take these factors into account, and reliable calculations
of patterns over real earth may be made. Yagi patterns
over real earth are shown in Figs 8 through 14. These
patterns were calculated with an Apple Ile personal
computer.3 "Average" soil conditions were used for
these plots, that is, a conductivity of 5 millisiemens per
meter and a dielectric constant of 15.4 These patterns
compare the performance of Yagi arrays at heights of
35 and 70 feet. In Figs 8 through 12, the broken line is
the plot for a 35 -foot height, and the solid line for 70 feet.
For 24.9 and 28 MHz, Figs 13 and 14, it is helpful to
present the 35- and 70 -foot patterns in separate graphs,
for clarity. Otherwise the multiple lobes become indis-
tinguishable.
3A commercially available software program, ANNIE, was used
to calculate all patterns presented in this paper.
•Such soil conditions may be considered typical for the central
part of the United States, such as the Ohio and Mississippi
river valleys.
90
Fig 8—Vertical-profile pattern of a 7 -MHz Yagi beam
over average earth at a height of 70 feet (solid line)
and at 35 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 9—Vertical-profile pattern of a 10.1 -MHz Yagi beam
at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 10—Vertical-profile pattern of a 14 -MHz Yagi beam
at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 11—Vertical-profile pattern of an 18.1 -MHz Yagi
beam at 70 feet (solid line) and at 34 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 12—Vertical-profile pattern of. a 21 -MHz Yagi beam
at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line):
compass directions, as a solid line. The broken line in
Fig 6 shows the pattern of a half -wavelength dipole, for
comparison. Fig 7 shows the elevation plane or vertical -
profile pattern. This pattern is that seen from the ends
of the elements, with the antenna in free space. The solid
line again represents the Yagi, and the broken line the
dipole, that "perfect circle" which was mentioned earlier.
Performance of most other Yagi-type arrays with three
or four elements will not be significantly different from
the patterns shown here.
Another often -used type of beam antenna is the
quad array. Typically, a quad is constructed with two or
more wire elements in the form of a square or a diamond.
The conducting wires are usually supported by X-shaped
frames of wood or fiberglass material. For the same
number of elements and spacing, the performance of a
quad beam is generally similar to that of a Yagi beam.
The vertical patterns of Figs 4 and 5 were calculated
by assuming the earth is a perfect reflector, an unrealistic
situation. Actual earth does not reflect all of the radio-
frequency energy striking it; some absorption takes
place. Over real earth, therefore, the patterns will be
slightly different, depending upon the electrical con-
ductivity and dielectric constant of the soil, and upon the
radio frequency. Computer programs are available to
take these factors into account, and reliable calculations
of patterns over real earth may be made. Yagi patterns
over real earth are shown in Figs 8 through 14. These
patterns were calculated with an Apple Ile personal
computer.3 "Average" soil conditions were used for
these plots, that is, a conductivity of 5 millisiemens per
meter and a dielectric constant of 15.4 These patterns
compare the performance of Yagi arrays at heights of
35 and 70 feet. In Figs 8 through 12, the broken line is
the plot for a 35 -foot height, and the solid line for 70 feet.
For 24.9 and 28 MHz, Figs 13 and 14, it is helpful to
present the 35- and 70 -foot patterns in separate graphs,
for clarity. Otherwise the multiple lobes become indis-
tinguishable.
3A commercially available software program, ANNIE, was used
to calculate all patterns presented in this paper.
•Such soil conditions may be considered typical for the central
part of the United States, such as the Ohio and Mississippi
river valleys.
90
Fig 8—Vertical-profile pattern of a 7 -MHz Yagi beam
over average earth at a height of 70 feet (solid line)
and at 35 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 9—Vertical-profile pattern of a 10.1 -MHz Yagi beam
at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 10—Vertical-profile pattern of a 14 -MHz Yagi beam
at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 11—Vertical-profile pattern of an 18.1 -MHz Yagi
beam at 70 feet (solid line) and at 34 feet (broken line).
90
Fig 12—Vertical-profile pattern of. a 21 -MHz Yagi beam
at 70 feet (solid line) and at 35 feet (broken line):
(A)
90
(B)
Fig 13—At A, vertical -profile pattern of a 24.9 -MHz Vagi
beam at 35 feet, and at B, 70 feet.
(A)
(8)
Fig 14—At A, vertical -profile pattern of a 28 -MHz Yagi
beam at 35 feet, and at B, 70 feet.
Fig 8 shows the vertical profile for 7 -MHz Yagi
beams. For a height of 35 feet, the energy is maximum
at a vertical angle of 34° above the horizon. At a height
of 70 feet, maximum radiation occurs at an angle of 24°.
Table 3—Comparison of
of 35 and 70 Feet
(-At 35 Feet-)
Elev. angle of
Frequency max. radiation
7.0 34 degrees •
10.1 29
14.0 24
18.1 20
21.0 18
24.9 15
28.0 14
Yagi Beams
(-At 70 Feet-)
Elev. angle of
max. radiation
24 degrees
18
14
11
9
8
7
at Heights
Performance
difference
at 50
5.7 decibels
5.7
5.6
5.4
5.2
4.9
4.6 •
This is 10° lower than for the same antenna at 35 feet.
In addition, in the 2- to 10 -degree elevation range, those
angles that are necessary for communicating over
thousands of miles,- the performance of the low Yagi
beam is nominally 5.6 dB below that of the high Yagi.
At a wave angle of 5.0°, the response of the Yagi at
70 feet is superior by 5.7 dB.
Similar data can be obtained from Figs 9 through
14 for the amateur frequencies from 10.1 through
28 MHz. The differences in performance for the amateur
bands from 7 to 28 MHz are summarized in Table 3.
As Table 3 indicates, a Yagi antenna at 70 feet
provides far greater radiation at low angles for all
frequencies than the same antenna at 35 feet. This
translates to greater communications effectiveness at
long distances, and is especially true for the lower
frequencies. At a 5° wave angle, the differences in field
strengths range from 4.6 to 5.7 dB. This means that the
power at a distant receiving antenna for most propa-
gation conditions will be from 2.9 to 3.7 times stronger
from a Yagi antenna at 70 feet, compared to the same
Yagi at 35 feet. Heights greater than 70 feet will produce
even higher power ratios.
In summary, a high Yagi antenna provides superior
performance over a low Yagi, all other factors being
equal. Depending on the level of noise and interference,
the performance differences related to height are often
enough to mean the difference between making distant
radio contact with fairly reliable signals; and being unable
to make contact at all. •
Very High and Ultra High Frequencies
Commonly used amateur frequencies higher than
those discussed earlier are the very high frequency
portion of the spectrum, abbreviated VHF, and the ultra
high frequencies, or UHF. The VHF range covers 30 to
300 MHz, and the UHF range from 300 to 3000 MHz.
In an earlier section it was mentioned that ,HF
antennas must be large to be effective. To some degree,
however, those considerations are not unique to that
frequency range. They apply in general to VHF and UHF
as well. A difference at VHF and UHF' is that antennas
may be physically small in order to realize optimum
electrical lengths. However, a disadvantage of physically
(A)
90
(B)
Fig 13—At A, vertical -profile pattern of a 24.9 -MHz Vagi
beam at 35 feet, and at B, 70 feet.
(A)
(8)
Fig 14—At A, vertical -profile pattern of a 28 -MHz Yagi
beam at 35 feet, and at B, 70 feet.
Fig 8 shows the vertical profile for 7 -MHz Yagi
beams. For a height of 35 feet, the energy is maximum
at a vertical angle of 34° above the horizon. At a height
of 70 feet, maximum radiation occurs at an angle of 24°.
Table 3—Comparison of
of 35 and 70 Feet
(-At 35 Feet-)
Elev. angle of
Frequency max. radiation
7.0 34 degrees •
10.1 29
14.0 24
18.1 20
21.0 18
24.9 15
28.0 14
Yagi Beams
(-At 70 Feet-)
Elev. angle of
max. radiation
24 degrees
18
14
11
9
8
7
at Heights
Performance
difference
at 50
5.7 decibels
5.7
5.6
5.4
5.2
4.9
4.6 •
This is 10° lower than for the same antenna at 35 feet.
In addition, in the 2- to 10 -degree elevation range, those
angles that are necessary for communicating over
thousands of miles,- the performance of the low Yagi
beam is nominally 5.6 dB below that of the high Yagi.
At a wave angle of 5.0°, the response of the Yagi at
70 feet is superior by 5.7 dB.
Similar data can be obtained from Figs 9 through
14 for the amateur frequencies from 10.1 through
28 MHz. The differences in performance for the amateur
bands from 7 to 28 MHz are summarized in Table 3.
As Table 3 indicates, a Yagi antenna at 70 feet
provides far greater radiation at low angles for all
frequencies than the same antenna at 35 feet. This
translates to greater communications effectiveness at
long distances, and is especially true for the lower
frequencies. At a 5° wave angle, the differences in field
strengths range from 4.6 to 5.7 dB. This means that the
power at a distant receiving antenna for most propa-
gation conditions will be from 2.9 to 3.7 times stronger
from a Yagi antenna at 70 feet, compared to the same
Yagi at 35 feet. Heights greater than 70 feet will produce
even higher power ratios.
In summary, a high Yagi antenna provides superior
performance over a low Yagi, all other factors being
equal. Depending on the level of noise and interference,
the performance differences related to height are often
enough to mean the difference between making distant
radio contact with fairly reliable signals; and being unable
to make contact at all. •
Very High and Ultra High Frequencies
Commonly used amateur frequencies higher than
those discussed earlier are the very high frequency
portion of the spectrum, abbreviated VHF, and the ultra
high frequencies, or UHF. The VHF range covers 30 to
300 MHz, and the UHF range from 300 to 3000 MHz.
In an earlier section it was mentioned that ,HF
antennas must be large to be effective. To some degree,
however, those considerations are not unique to that
frequency range. They apply in general to VHF and UHF
as well. A difference at VHF and UHF' is that antennas
may be physically small in order to realize optimum
electrical lengths. However, a disadvantage of physically
small antennas is that they present Tess surface area to
passing radio waves, and are therefore less effective in
picking up incoming signals. This effect is termed pickup
efficiency. Pickup efficiency is reciprocative; it applies
to transmitted signals as well as to received signals. To
obtain higher pickup efficiency and therefore greater
communications effectiveness, many antenna elements
are required at VHF and UHF. The elements are usually
installed on multiple booms. Single, vertical radiators,
even at elevated heights, are ineffective for distances
beyond a few miles at these frequency ranges. This is
true because of low pickup efficiency and because of the
omnidirectional characteristic of the radiator. Stacked
vertical radiators are sometimes used to obtain gain with
omnidirectional coverage.
Although ionospheric propagation does sometimes
occur at the lower end of the VHF range, propagation
at 100 MHz and above is almost always over a line -of -
sight path. Under usual conditions, signals at these
frequencies encounter very little refraction in air. There=
fore it behooves a person using these frequencies to
place his antenna as high as possible, so it can "see"
farther. Certainly the antenna must be above sur-
rounding objects, such as dense foliage and man-made
structures. Such objects absorb radio-frequency energy
in this portion of the spectrum, and therefore tend to
block the signal from propagating. Objects such as hills,
steel structures and many commercial or industrial
buildings will block VHF signals to an even greater
degree, creating "shadows" behind them.
At VHF and UHF, the lowest lobes for Yagi arrays
at 35 and 70 feet are only a few degrees above the
horizontal. However, for line -of -sight communications,
the radiation angle should be zero, if possible, unless
one wishes to communicate with airplanes or objects in
outer space. Even more desirable are negative angles
from high locations, so the antenna can "look down on"
the terrain. At VHF and UHF the radiation angles for
35 -foot heights are twice those occurring for the 70 -foot
heights. Therefore at VHF it is also beneficial to place
the antenna as high as possible, and in the clear from
surrounding objects.
Amateur Radio operators wishing to contact other
amateurs at great distances use a time -worn but true
expression, "For the best results, put your antenna as
high as you possibly can." Many amateurs in various
parts of the world put their big antennas atop 120 -foo'
towers, and enjoy communications with amateurs ii.
foreign countries when neighboring amateurs with much
lower antennas cannot even hear the foreign signals.
Conclusion
The preceding information has dealt with antenna
height and communications effectiveness. It has been
shown that for all amateur frequencies, high horizontal
antennas will outperform low antennas. Information has
been developed to show a consistent power gain of the
higher antennas over low ones, that is, at 70 feet and
35 feet. The 70 -foot height was chosen only for the
purpose of illustration, and is not intended to be
construed as the optimum height for antennas. Heights
above 100 feet will give significantly better performance
than at 70 feet.
It is reasonable to assume that if an amateur
operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, he will
obtain transmitting equipment with a corresponding
increase in power output to compensate for the loss of
antenna effectiveness. For example, he might increase
his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1.5 kilowatts to
compensate for a three -fold loss in antenna effectiveness
because of height limitations. It should be realized that
this increase in power, in turn, increases the possibilities
for his stronger signal to overload nearby television and
radio receivers, creating interference for viewers and
listeners.
There is one further consideration concerning
amateur antenna height with regard to television and
radio interference. In essence, the sole source of
radiated RF energy from an Amateur Radio station is its
antenna. Raising that antenna to an increased height,
far above the level of existing antennas for television
reception, will reduce the possibility of interference to
television reception from fundamental overload.
8
small antennas is that they present Tess surface area to
passing radio waves, and are therefore less effective in
picking up incoming signals. This effect is termed pickup
efficiency. Pickup efficiency is reciprocative; it applies
to transmitted signals as well as to received signals. To
obtain higher pickup efficiency and therefore greater
communications effectiveness, many antenna elements
are required at VHF and UHF. The elements are usually
installed on multiple booms. Single, vertical radiators,
even at elevated heights, are ineffective for distances
beyond a few miles at these frequency ranges. This is
true because of low pickup efficiency and because of the
omnidirectional characteristic of the radiator. Stacked
vertical radiators are sometimes used to obtain gain with
omnidirectional coverage.
Although ionospheric propagation does sometimes
occur at the lower end of the VHF range, propagation
at 100 MHz and above is almost always over a line -of -
sight path. Under usual conditions, signals at these
frequencies encounter very little refraction in air. There=
fore it behooves a person using these frequencies to
place his antenna as high as possible, so it can "see"
farther. Certainly the antenna must be above sur-
rounding objects, such as dense foliage and man-made
structures. Such objects absorb radio-frequency energy
in this portion of the spectrum, and therefore tend to
block the signal from propagating. Objects such as hills,
steel structures and many commercial or industrial
buildings will block VHF signals to an even greater
degree, creating "shadows" behind them.
At VHF and UHF, the lowest lobes for Yagi arrays
at 35 and 70 feet are only a few degrees above the
horizontal. However, for line -of -sight communications,
the radiation angle should be zero, if possible, unless
one wishes to communicate with airplanes or objects in
outer space. Even more desirable are negative angles
from high locations, so the antenna can "look down on"
the terrain. At VHF and UHF the radiation angles for
35 -foot heights are twice those occurring for the 70 -foot
heights. Therefore at VHF it is also beneficial to place
the antenna as high as possible, and in the clear from
surrounding objects.
Amateur Radio operators wishing to contact other
amateurs at great distances use a time -worn but true
expression, "For the best results, put your antenna as
high as you possibly can." Many amateurs in various
parts of the world put their big antennas atop 120 -foo'
towers, and enjoy communications with amateurs ii.
foreign countries when neighboring amateurs with much
lower antennas cannot even hear the foreign signals.
Conclusion
The preceding information has dealt with antenna
height and communications effectiveness. It has been
shown that for all amateur frequencies, high horizontal
antennas will outperform low antennas. Information has
been developed to show a consistent power gain of the
higher antennas over low ones, that is, at 70 feet and
35 feet. The 70 -foot height was chosen only for the
purpose of illustration, and is not intended to be
construed as the optimum height for antennas. Heights
above 100 feet will give significantly better performance
than at 70 feet.
It is reasonable to assume that if an amateur
operator is restricted to the use of low antennas, he will
obtain transmitting equipment with a corresponding
increase in power output to compensate for the loss of
antenna effectiveness. For example, he might increase
his transmitter power from 500 watts to 1.5 kilowatts to
compensate for a three -fold loss in antenna effectiveness
because of height limitations. It should be realized that
this increase in power, in turn, increases the possibilities
for his stronger signal to overload nearby television and
radio receivers, creating interference for viewers and
listeners.
There is one further consideration concerning
amateur antenna height with regard to television and
radio interference. In essence, the sole source of
radiated RF energy from an Amateur Radio station is its
antenna. Raising that antenna to an increased height,
far above the level of existing antennas for television
reception, will reduce the possibility of interference to
television reception from fundamental overload.
8
1.
AMATEUR RADIO PROFILE
A. WHAT IS AMATEUR RADIO?
The Amateur Radio Service was authorized by the Federal
Communications Commission several decades ago, following the
decision that regulation of radio communications was the
responsibility of the Federal Government (Communications Act of
1934). As contained in FCC Rules and Regulations Part 97, the
Amateur Radio Service was formed because of its unique ability to
foster international goodwill and at the same time provide a
valuable emergency communications system during times of disaster
and otehr situations. The Amateur Radio Service -is strictly a
noncommercial service: There may be no business conducted over
the system, and no payment for services may be accepted.
Traditionally a proving ground for technological advancement, the
Service is today carried out under strict regulation and
licensing by the FCC. A stringent series of exams must be passed
before one becomes licensed to transmit "ham radio" signals.
Licenses today are divided by class: Novice, Technician,
General, Advanced, and Extra. The Service today is working to
develop even further communications techniques in the following
areas:
- -
Dependable worldwide communication
FM, Single Sideband, Spread -Spectrum and other
voice technologies
Audioteletype and computer communications
using teletype, ASCII, AMTOR, Packet (AX.25)
and other sophisticated modes of transmission
Satellite communications using over a dozen
U.S. amateur -owned satellites and a like num-
ber of Soviet and other satellites to trans-
mit and receive signals around the world, in-
cluding communicating directly with several
astronauts aboard the Space Shuttle
Bouncing radio signals back from the moon
Amateur television signals sent around the
world
Microwave and other similar technologies
Exhibit
1.
AMATEUR RADIO PROFILE
A. WHAT IS AMATEUR RADIO?
The Amateur Radio Service was authorized by the Federal
Communications Commission several decades ago, following the
decision that regulation of radio communications was the
responsibility of the Federal Government (Communications Act of
1934). As contained in FCC Rules and Regulations Part 97, the
Amateur Radio Service was formed because of its unique ability to
foster international goodwill and at the same time provide a
valuable emergency communications system during times of disaster
and otehr situations. The Amateur Radio Service -is strictly a
noncommercial service: There may be no business conducted over
the system, and no payment for services may be accepted.
Traditionally a proving ground for technological advancement, the
Service is today carried out under strict regulation and
licensing by the FCC. A stringent series of exams must be passed
before one becomes licensed to transmit "ham radio" signals.
Licenses today are divided by class: Novice, Technician,
General, Advanced, and Extra. The Service today is working to
develop even further communications techniques in the following
areas:
- -
Dependable worldwide communication
FM, Single Sideband, Spread -Spectrum and other
voice technologies
Audioteletype and computer communications
using teletype, ASCII, AMTOR, Packet (AX.25)
and other sophisticated modes of transmission
Satellite communications using over a dozen
U.S. amateur -owned satellites and a like num-
ber of Soviet and other satellites to trans-
mit and receive signals around the world, in-
cluding communicating directly with several
astronauts aboard the Space Shuttle
Bouncing radio signals back from the moon
Amateur television signals sent around the
world
Microwave and other similar technologies
Exhibit
Extensive atmospheric and propagation
experiments
Reliable mobile and handheld communications
through complex repeater systems with comput-
erized control programs
These are only a few examples of the
Amateur Radio. Important to note is
communication are readily put to use
help.
A few examples:
current technology in
that all these forms of
in our communmities to be of
March 27, 1964: Alaska is struck by a monstrous
earthquake. Normal communications lines are cut.
Amateur Radio operators help coordinate rescue
operations.
November 23, 1980: Mt. St. Helens
ing damage over hundreds of miles.
beenwatching the mountain for the
services first spread the warning;
in so doing.
September, 1981: Hurricanes Allen and David
sweep through the Caribbean, heading for the
U.S. Coast. First damage reports from the
battered islands come via ham radio, often a
erupts spread
Hams who had
government
one was killed
day or more before normal communications are
restored.
September 29, 1985: A devastating earthquake
strikes Mexico, leveling much of Mexico City
and bringing death and destruction to the
attention of the world. Amateur Radio became
the only source of contact with the country
for several days. Local hams quickly and
efficiently conducted emergency communications
in and between the various centers of activity.
Thousands of "Health and Welfare" inquiries
were handled by amateur operators for weeks
following.
September 11-21, 1988: Hurrican Gilbert. Amateur
Radio operators providing early warning and follow-up
communication includign medical -relief communication
and health and welfare messages (see Exhibits C-1 and
C-2).
Extensive atmospheric and propagation
experiments
Reliable mobile and handheld communications
through complex repeater systems with comput-
erized control programs
These are only a few examples of the
Amateur Radio. Important to note is
communication are readily put to use
help.
A few examples:
current technology in
that all these forms of
in our communmities to be of
March 27, 1964: Alaska is struck by a monstrous
earthquake. Normal communications lines are cut.
Amateur Radio operators help coordinate rescue
operations.
November 23, 1980: Mt. St. Helens
ing damage over hundreds of miles.
beenwatching the mountain for the
services first spread the warning;
in so doing.
September, 1981: Hurricanes Allen and David
sweep through the Caribbean, heading for the
U.S. Coast. First damage reports from the
battered islands come via ham radio, often a
erupts spread
Hams who had
government
one was killed
day or more before normal communications are
restored.
September 29, 1985: A devastating earthquake
strikes Mexico, leveling much of Mexico City
and bringing death and destruction to the
attention of the world. Amateur Radio became
the only source of contact with the country
for several days. Local hams quickly and
efficiently conducted emergency communications
in and between the various centers of activity.
Thousands of "Health and Welfare" inquiries
were handled by amateur operators for weeks
following.
September 11-21, 1988: Hurrican Gilbert. Amateur
Radio operators providing early warning and follow-up
communication includign medical -relief communication
and health and welfare messages (see Exhibits C-1 and
C-2).
September 21-22, 1989: Hurrican Hugo battered
the South Carolina coast, desroying millions of
dollars in property and claiming lives. Ham radio
operators provided early warning of the storms,
followed with necessary emergency communications,
and moved thousands of "Health and Welfare" messages
from around the nation (see Exhibit C-3).
October 17, 1989: San Francisco and the Bay Area
were struck by a 7.0 Richter Scale earthquake.
Amateurs provided early communication to the
earthquake -stricken area and, in the first five
days, handled more than 3,000 messages from the
devasted area (see Exhibit C-4).
Emergency communication is taken in stride by Amateur Radio
operators who stand ready to be the only communications link into
a stricken area. Hams provide tactical field assistance, and
provide health and welfare inquiries from the general public.
B. WHO ARE RADIO AMATEURS?
Radio amateurs are progressive, technically proficient people of
all walks of life. The brotherhood of Amateur Radio is world-
wide, with representatives from every nation on earth and from
all cultures, beliefs, colors, and economic strata. "Hams" range
in age from 8 to well over 80. Many handicapped people find a
door to the world in Amateur Radio (see Exhibit C-4). Many
famous people are amateur radio operators - Senators, Kings,
Astronauts. But more often than not, hams are just plain folk
who like making friends around the world. This bond of com-
munication can overcome political propaganda and repression. In
fact, it is this ability to create and foster international good-
will which is one of the primary justifications for establishing
the Service.
The Amateur Radio operator has proven skills. It is one of the
few hobby pursuits which requires certified and tested pro-
ficiency prior to engaging in the activities in the form of
successfully completed FCC exams. The training and skills of
Amateur Radio operators make them a national resource in times of
need - they may be called on by any of our governmental agencies
to help in a communications emergency (see Exhibit C-5). But
closer to home, hams don't wait for emergencies to get involved
in their communities. Many individual hams and local Amateur
- Radio clubs work on a regular basis with a variety of church,
civic and community organizations. As 'a group, ham operators are
willing to become a vital part of their community as "good
citizens."
September 21-22, 1989: Hurrican Hugo battered
the South Carolina coast, desroying millions of
dollars in property and claiming lives. Ham radio
operators provided early warning of the storms,
followed with necessary emergency communications,
and moved thousands of "Health and Welfare" messages
from around the nation (see Exhibit C-3).
October 17, 1989: San Francisco and the Bay Area
were struck by a 7.0 Richter Scale earthquake.
Amateurs provided early communication to the
earthquake -stricken area and, in the first five
days, handled more than 3,000 messages from the
devasted area (see Exhibit C-4).
Emergency communication is taken in stride by Amateur Radio
operators who stand ready to be the only communications link into
a stricken area. Hams provide tactical field assistance, and
provide health and welfare inquiries from the general public.
B. WHO ARE RADIO AMATEURS?
Radio amateurs are progressive, technically proficient people of
all walks of life. The brotherhood of Amateur Radio is world-
wide, with representatives from every nation on earth and from
all cultures, beliefs, colors, and economic strata. "Hams" range
in age from 8 to well over 80. Many handicapped people find a
door to the world in Amateur Radio (see Exhibit C-4). Many
famous people are amateur radio operators - Senators, Kings,
Astronauts. But more often than not, hams are just plain folk
who like making friends around the world. This bond of com-
munication can overcome political propaganda and repression. In
fact, it is this ability to create and foster international good-
will which is one of the primary justifications for establishing
the Service.
The Amateur Radio operator has proven skills. It is one of the
few hobby pursuits which requires certified and tested pro-
ficiency prior to engaging in the activities in the form of
successfully completed FCC exams. The training and skills of
Amateur Radio operators make them a national resource in times of
need - they may be called on by any of our governmental agencies
to help in a communications emergency (see Exhibit C-5). But
closer to home, hams don't wait for emergencies to get involved
in their communities. Many individual hams and local Amateur
- Radio clubs work on a regular basis with a variety of church,
civic and community organizations. As 'a group, ham operators are
willing to become a vital part of their community as "good
citizens."
11.
BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY
A. WHAT VALUE IS AMATEUR RADIO?
This widespread, technical hobby is far more than a series of
radio'experiments for kids carried out by a "special interest
group." This Service is used on a daily basis for the safety and
good of the citizens of Minnesota. The Amateur Radio Service
under FCC direction is a valuable adjunct to this area's safety
and emergency forces.
The most critical communication is that involving the protection
of life and property. It can range from rescue of a floundering
ship at sea to medical attention for a South American girl, to
communications from a major disaster site within the United
States. It is a daily occurrence within The Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area.
Through computer -controlled telephone links
which directly access Police, Fire and other
safety departments, Ham Radio operators can
call directly from the scene of an emergency.
Amateur operators routinely report specific
and accurate locations and assessments of
emergencies. This accuracy helps make certain
that the expensive safety division response is
necessary, helping to prevent false runs.
On a wider scale, the best example of direct
protection of life and property is the SkyWarn
Network. Operating under the general direction
of the National Weather Service, this activity
responds instantly to the presence or threat of
severe weather. Amateur Radio operators are
requested to report to the local National Weather
Service Office, a communications center, to
monitor the progress of storms as they enter the
state and receive reports from highly trained
"ham" operators who act as spotters within a wide
coverage area of the Twin City Metropolitan Area.
In actual practice, these spotters provide an
early warning for severe weather and are able to
diffuse misguided reports from the public to
avoid false alarms and needless tornado sirens.
Amateur radio operators routinely provide
11.
BENEFITS TO THE COMMUNITY
A. WHAT VALUE IS AMATEUR RADIO?
This widespread, technical hobby is far more than a series of
radio'experiments for kids carried out by a "special interest
group." This Service is used on a daily basis for the safety and
good of the citizens of Minnesota. The Amateur Radio Service
under FCC direction is a valuable adjunct to this area's safety
and emergency forces.
The most critical communication is that involving the protection
of life and property. It can range from rescue of a floundering
ship at sea to medical attention for a South American girl, to
communications from a major disaster site within the United
States. It is a daily occurrence within The Twin Cities
Metropolitan Area.
Through computer -controlled telephone links
which directly access Police, Fire and other
safety departments, Ham Radio operators can
call directly from the scene of an emergency.
Amateur operators routinely report specific
and accurate locations and assessments of
emergencies. This accuracy helps make certain
that the expensive safety division response is
necessary, helping to prevent false runs.
On a wider scale, the best example of direct
protection of life and property is the SkyWarn
Network. Operating under the general direction
of the National Weather Service, this activity
responds instantly to the presence or threat of
severe weather. Amateur Radio operators are
requested to report to the local National Weather
Service Office, a communications center, to
monitor the progress of storms as they enter the
state and receive reports from highly trained
"ham" operators who act as spotters within a wide
coverage area of the Twin City Metropolitan Area.
In actual practice, these spotters provide an
early warning for severe weather and are able to
diffuse misguided reports from the public to
avoid false alarms and needless tornado sirens.
Amateur radio operators routinely provide
disaster and emergency -related communications
for the Disaster Services Division of the Red
Cross, which maintains a well-equipped Amateur
Radio station at its headquarters. In training
for this type of service, an organization called
Amateur Radio Emergency Services operates with
the First Aid Corps of the Red Cross to coor-
dinate various public service events.
Emergency communications for the National Disaster
Medical System is provided by a network of ama-
teurs on the local, state and national levels.
Operations centers support active amateur radio
stations manned by volunteers during tornados,
blizzards and other emergencies.
Emergency coordination may be provided for
municipalities within the area, including fire
departments, police and command posts, if their
own communications capabilities become over-
loaded.
During the most recent test of the System on
April 22, 1989, 100 Amateur Radio Operators partici-
pated in the drill in the Twin Cities Area.
These are just a few examples of the types of critical services
provided over the years by Amateur Radio operators without cost
or obligation. Annually, local amateurs providing services to
civic events and agencies devote hundreds of manhours of volun-
teer time. Many of these events would otherwise overburden gov-
ernmental service. The availability of Amateur Radio helps to
reduce the government's financial and manpower requirements to
coordinate these events and protect those participating and
watching them.
In addition to providing a direct and tangible service, Amateur
Radio offers a more intangible benefit as well. Through indivi-
dual contacts around the country and the world, our ability to
present the Twin Cities metropolitan area with its technical
advancement, thriving economy and secure residential outlook
serves to enhance our community's reputation. This area's high
level of technical industries can be linked to Amateur Radio,
because the innovators in industry are the Amateur Radio hobby-
ists who take their interests in electronics, computers and com-
munications home with them.
disaster and emergency -related communications
for the Disaster Services Division of the Red
Cross, which maintains a well-equipped Amateur
Radio station at its headquarters. In training
for this type of service, an organization called
Amateur Radio Emergency Services operates with
the First Aid Corps of the Red Cross to coor-
dinate various public service events.
Emergency communications for the National Disaster
Medical System is provided by a network of ama-
teurs on the local, state and national levels.
Operations centers support active amateur radio
stations manned by volunteers during tornados,
blizzards and other emergencies.
Emergency coordination may be provided for
municipalities within the area, including fire
departments, police and command posts, if their
own communications capabilities become over-
loaded.
During the most recent test of the System on
April 22, 1989, 100 Amateur Radio Operators partici-
pated in the drill in the Twin Cities Area.
These are just a few examples of the types of critical services
provided over the years by Amateur Radio operators without cost
or obligation. Annually, local amateurs providing services to
civic events and agencies devote hundreds of manhours of volun-
teer time. Many of these events would otherwise overburden gov-
ernmental service. The availability of Amateur Radio helps to
reduce the government's financial and manpower requirements to
coordinate these events and protect those participating and
watching them.
In addition to providing a direct and tangible service, Amateur
Radio offers a more intangible benefit as well. Through indivi-
dual contacts around the country and the world, our ability to
present the Twin Cities metropolitan area with its technical
advancement, thriving economy and secure residential outlook
serves to enhance our community's reputation. This area's high
level of technical industries can be linked to Amateur Radio,
because the innovators in industry are the Amateur Radio hobby-
ists who take their interests in electronics, computers and com-
munications home with them.
hi riCiAiiit
icsiv t(; -
Amateur Radio came through with flying colors when Hurricane
Gilbert cut a wide path of destruction in September 1988.
By Luck Hurder, KY1T
Deputy Manager, Field Services Department
r -t he recent onslaught of Hurricane
Gilbert, which decimated Jamaica,
again pointed out the invaluable
service that is so often provided by on -
the -scene amateurs during emergency
situations.
When normal channels of communica-
tion failed in storm -ravaged Jamaica, and
shortly thereafter on Grand Cayman,
Amateur Radio volunteers maintained con-
tact between these islands and the rest of
the world. For many days, radio links were
provided from point to point on the
islands, as well as from a Targe number of
countries worldwide to the islands. These
links served to keep island government
officials in touch with emergency services
in the United States, as well as to pass
messages to and from worried friends and
relatives.
ARRL volunteers, such as Emergency
Coordinator Ken Harwood, WA5QZI, are
typically already hard at work long before
the disaster actually strikes.
"We start tracking hurricanes early on,"
states Ken, "because most of those that hit
the Texas coastline come from the Yucatan
area. A week before Gilbert hit Mexico
and Texas, we were already on the air
monitoring radio traffic and communi-
cating with other Amateur Radio operators
in the Caribbean. Following the evacuation
of thousands of Texans, we provided
around-the-clock communications cover-
age for the Red Cross Disaster Service,
which had opened 19 shelters."
Hurricane Gilbert spawned far more
records than simply the lowest pressure ever
observed tin a Western Hemisphere hur-
ricane. It also, saw the implementation of
new plans of action worked out by various
members of the Amateur Radio com-
munity. Some of the communications
support plans put to use in this disaster had
been formulated and exercised over the
years, and some evolved spontaneously. An
example of this was the operation of the
Hurricane Watch Net on 14.325 MHz.
First organized during Hurricane Betsy
in 1965, this network of radio amateurs has
constantly been undergoing changes suit-
able for the times and technology. Some
of the key players have come and gone, and
others have been there all along. During
and after each storm, they have handled
things slightly differently, but the basic
Damaged aircraft at Jamaica's Montego Bay Airport.
C-1
Graham, W4PJS/6Y5RO, at the operating
position in Kingston, Jamaica.
procedure has always been to disseminate
the official National Hurricane Center
(NHC) advisories and bulletins, to seek the
weather reports (ground truths) in the
affected areas and to provide support for
disaster -relief officials. Key to this support
is the organization of the Dade County
amateurs who man Amateur Radio equip-
ment in the NHC, and the members of the
Hurricane Watch Net.(HWN) who gather
reports Froin affected areas and read the
NHC advisories to people on the net.
Forecasting hurricane behavior falls far
short of a perfect science. In order in fore-
cast weather at all, the meteorologists Ilium
have command of a bewildering. amount of
clam. Within the borders ol•our count n—
given the numerous official obser,,Ilion
sites such as airports, laboratories and
universities they have a licher cicmcc of
being accurate in their forecasts. But for
a storm well out in the ocean, there is
precious little data available. even though.
we du get some data front satellites, buoys,
ships, aircraft and the occasional island
reports. Governments can only fund so
many observation posts and must therefore
heavily depend••on volunteers. When the
storms cross international waters and inter-
.: February 1989 15
hi riCiAiiit
icsiv t(; -
Amateur Radio came through with flying colors when Hurricane
Gilbert cut a wide path of destruction in September 1988.
By Luck Hurder, KY1T
Deputy Manager, Field Services Department
r -t he recent onslaught of Hurricane
Gilbert, which decimated Jamaica,
again pointed out the invaluable
service that is so often provided by on -
the -scene amateurs during emergency
situations.
When normal channels of communica-
tion failed in storm -ravaged Jamaica, and
shortly thereafter on Grand Cayman,
Amateur Radio volunteers maintained con-
tact between these islands and the rest of
the world. For many days, radio links were
provided from point to point on the
islands, as well as from a Targe number of
countries worldwide to the islands. These
links served to keep island government
officials in touch with emergency services
in the United States, as well as to pass
messages to and from worried friends and
relatives.
ARRL volunteers, such as Emergency
Coordinator Ken Harwood, WA5QZI, are
typically already hard at work long before
the disaster actually strikes.
"We start tracking hurricanes early on,"
states Ken, "because most of those that hit
the Texas coastline come from the Yucatan
area. A week before Gilbert hit Mexico
and Texas, we were already on the air
monitoring radio traffic and communi-
cating with other Amateur Radio operators
in the Caribbean. Following the evacuation
of thousands of Texans, we provided
around-the-clock communications cover-
age for the Red Cross Disaster Service,
which had opened 19 shelters."
Hurricane Gilbert spawned far more
records than simply the lowest pressure ever
observed tin a Western Hemisphere hur-
ricane. It also, saw the implementation of
new plans of action worked out by various
members of the Amateur Radio com-
munity. Some of the communications
support plans put to use in this disaster had
been formulated and exercised over the
years, and some evolved spontaneously. An
example of this was the operation of the
Hurricane Watch Net on 14.325 MHz.
First organized during Hurricane Betsy
in 1965, this network of radio amateurs has
constantly been undergoing changes suit-
able for the times and technology. Some
of the key players have come and gone, and
others have been there all along. During
and after each storm, they have handled
things slightly differently, but the basic
Damaged aircraft at Jamaica's Montego Bay Airport.
C-1
Graham, W4PJS/6Y5RO, at the operating
position in Kingston, Jamaica.
procedure has always been to disseminate
the official National Hurricane Center
(NHC) advisories and bulletins, to seek the
weather reports (ground truths) in the
affected areas and to provide support for
disaster -relief officials. Key to this support
is the organization of the Dade County
amateurs who man Amateur Radio equip-
ment in the NHC, and the members of the
Hurricane Watch Net.(HWN) who gather
reports Froin affected areas and read the
NHC advisories to people on the net.
Forecasting hurricane behavior falls far
short of a perfect science. In order in fore-
cast weather at all, the meteorologists Ilium
have command of a bewildering. amount of
clam. Within the borders ol•our count n—
given the numerous official obser,,Ilion
sites such as airports, laboratories and
universities they have a licher cicmcc of
being accurate in their forecasts. But for
a storm well out in the ocean, there is
precious little data available. even though.
we du get some data front satellites, buoys,
ships, aircraft and the occasional island
reports. Governments can only fund so
many observation posts and must therefore
heavily depend••on volunteers. When the
storms cross international waters and inter-
.: February 1989 15
Salvation Army Colonel Thompson and W4PJS/6Y5R0 at the operating postion.
national boundaries, the communications
difficulties and complexities create much
more of a problem. Amateur Radio oper-
ators are able to provide the required
support.
Getting the watches and warnings into
the hands of the people who need them
poses yet another communications
problem. In fact, it represents a double-
edged sword, as timely notice of advancing
storms creates heavy responsibilities for not
only the NHC, but for local governmental
and disaster -relief officials as well. Errors
in the placement of watches and warnings
can cause severe economic burdens, as well
as the more obvious loss of life or property.
While it is often difficult at best to com-
municate watches and warnings into the
areas where they apply, warning persons on
the islands, at sea and in some foreign
places is especially difficult. This represents
yet another area where Amateur Radio
steps in to fill a void or to' supplement
existing channels.
Once an area falls under the gun, reports
to the NHC help refine the advisories and
bulletins, as well as the watches and
warnings. Frequently, official paths of
communications become inoperative
because of the storm, and the Amateur
Radio Service suddenly finds itself as the
only way to communicate. This became the
case during Gilbert in many places. The
initial scope of the disaster was first heard
in several cases on the Hurricane Watch
Net. The HWN provided this information
to the NHC, where the attention
of the government and the media were
focused. Many other nets sprang up to
provide the necessary disaster relief. The
initial interest in Gilbert was sparked on the
HWN while they were still working with
16 LIST.
future Hurricane Florence in the Gulf of
Mexico. At the time, Gilbert was merely a
tropical depression well to the east of the
Antilles, and Florence was still a tropical
storm. Both had been carefully watched for
some time, Gilbert from its spawning
grounds near the Cape Verde Islands. And
before the final gasp from Gilbert, the
HWN was watching future Hurricane
Helene as it came off the African coast. It
soon became evident that Gilbert was going
to be a major storm, but even this was an
understatement. Named a tropical
depression on September 9, it became
Tropical Storm Gilbert the very next day,
with a 72 -hour forecast promising the
possibility of winds in excess of 100 knots.
Members of the HWN advised persons in
the Antilles and elsewhere along the
projected track, and provided the updated
advisories and bulletins.
Staying well south of the populated
islands, Gilbert still was able to levy death
and destruction in the islands north of its
track, but this was for the most part within
the capabilities of local officials and the net
was not activated. The Hurricane Watch
Net began operations the morning of
September 11, operating in conjunction
with personnel in NHC from Dade County,
Florida. Gilbert had moved to 150 miles
SSE of Santo Domingo and had winds of
80 knots. Reports as received from several
amateurs in the Dominican Republic and
Haiti were relayed to and from NHC.
Jamaican stations received the initial
progress reports, relaying them to their
local officials regularly. This gave them
some preparation time, but even that
proved inadequate in some cases. Jamaica
was devastated two days later by Gilbert,
which at the time had a relatively tame
central pressure of 960 millibars and
sustained %%lids of about 115 mi/h. One by
one, amateur. in .I.in:uc.h lost power,
antennas :uitl t r .ihilit� I...anuunti�ae
with the outside %%urld. ( hue of the few %vho
stayed on %%as 1.2It1'I' 61 5, in a hotel near
Montego Bay; he lust must of his antenna
and some of the walls of his hotel room,
but managed to make reports. He and the
others in the area would find themselves
overburdened shorty with disaster -relief
and health -and -welfare communications.
Next on Gilbert's agenda was the
Cayman chain. Located just south of
Cuba, they look a glancing blow of some
140 mph from Gilbert. 1 here were no
casualties in the chain, but there was, of
course, some damage. Because of the path
of the storm near Cuba, warnings were
likewise up in that country. In the past,
there was rarely any contact between HWN
and Cuban amateurs. For Gilbert,
however, there were frequent and regular
reports through CO2KK and other
amateurs of conditions ashore and, more
importantly, reports from Cuban radar,
detailing the conditions and movements of
the eye of Gilbert to the Hurricane Center.
This caused, great excitement among the
leadership of the NHC and became an in-
centive for the members of the HWN. All
political differences were put aside; we were
"colegas" once again.
Ahead lay the Yucatan peninsula. Behind
lay the ruins of Jamaica, the damage on the
Cayman group and Cuba, the minor gales
in the Florida Keys and the Bahamas. The
dead and injured in the islands on the
northern tier of the Caribbean were being
tended to and life there was returning more
or less to normal. Coming along in the
wake of the storm was yet another surprise
for the HWN and listeners. A British Naval
Frigate, the HMS Active, was enroute to
Georgetown, Cayman Islands, to render as-
sistance. She made and maintained contact
with the island through the HWN, ZF1RC,
and others.
Also ahead lay the deepening of the
central pressure to a new world -record low,
for a hurricane, of 885 millibars, second
only to Super Typhoon Tip near the
Philippines in 1979. Mindful of the impor-
tance of strict radio discipline and the ever-
increasing need for Amateur Radio com-
munications, the Director of the National
Hurricane Center requested the FCC to
declare an emergency on 14.325 MHz for
weather-related work and on 14.275 MHz
for disaster relief in already stricken areas.
It was quickly granted and broadcast by
WIAW in official bulletins; all of this was
in accordance with long-established plans
and Part 97.107 of the FCC Rules. This
particular paragraph is apparently unknown
to many amateurs and should be studied
by all those who wish to participate in the
future of emergency communications.
With the persistent storm bearing down
a
11
a
k
B
of
bh
01
to
in
w,
of
en
ht
ar
let
R:
ex
ex
co
set
Se
H;
Ca
a
be
of
pr
let
du
kr
ap
fa
M
IC
wi
en
Salvation Army Colonel Thompson and W4PJS/6Y5R0 at the operating postion.
national boundaries, the communications
difficulties and complexities create much
more of a problem. Amateur Radio oper-
ators are able to provide the required
support.
Getting the watches and warnings into
the hands of the people who need them
poses yet another communications
problem. In fact, it represents a double-
edged sword, as timely notice of advancing
storms creates heavy responsibilities for not
only the NHC, but for local governmental
and disaster -relief officials as well. Errors
in the placement of watches and warnings
can cause severe economic burdens, as well
as the more obvious loss of life or property.
While it is often difficult at best to com-
municate watches and warnings into the
areas where they apply, warning persons on
the islands, at sea and in some foreign
places is especially difficult. This represents
yet another area where Amateur Radio
steps in to fill a void or to' supplement
existing channels.
Once an area falls under the gun, reports
to the NHC help refine the advisories and
bulletins, as well as the watches and
warnings. Frequently, official paths of
communications become inoperative
because of the storm, and the Amateur
Radio Service suddenly finds itself as the
only way to communicate. This became the
case during Gilbert in many places. The
initial scope of the disaster was first heard
in several cases on the Hurricane Watch
Net. The HWN provided this information
to the NHC, where the attention
of the government and the media were
focused. Many other nets sprang up to
provide the necessary disaster relief. The
initial interest in Gilbert was sparked on the
HWN while they were still working with
16 LIST.
future Hurricane Florence in the Gulf of
Mexico. At the time, Gilbert was merely a
tropical depression well to the east of the
Antilles, and Florence was still a tropical
storm. Both had been carefully watched for
some time, Gilbert from its spawning
grounds near the Cape Verde Islands. And
before the final gasp from Gilbert, the
HWN was watching future Hurricane
Helene as it came off the African coast. It
soon became evident that Gilbert was going
to be a major storm, but even this was an
understatement. Named a tropical
depression on September 9, it became
Tropical Storm Gilbert the very next day,
with a 72 -hour forecast promising the
possibility of winds in excess of 100 knots.
Members of the HWN advised persons in
the Antilles and elsewhere along the
projected track, and provided the updated
advisories and bulletins.
Staying well south of the populated
islands, Gilbert still was able to levy death
and destruction in the islands north of its
track, but this was for the most part within
the capabilities of local officials and the net
was not activated. The Hurricane Watch
Net began operations the morning of
September 11, operating in conjunction
with personnel in NHC from Dade County,
Florida. Gilbert had moved to 150 miles
SSE of Santo Domingo and had winds of
80 knots. Reports as received from several
amateurs in the Dominican Republic and
Haiti were relayed to and from NHC.
Jamaican stations received the initial
progress reports, relaying them to their
local officials regularly. This gave them
some preparation time, but even that
proved inadequate in some cases. Jamaica
was devastated two days later by Gilbert,
which at the time had a relatively tame
central pressure of 960 millibars and
sustained %%lids of about 115 mi/h. One by
one, amateur. in .I.in:uc.h lost power,
antennas :uitl t r .ihilit� I...anuunti�ae
with the outside %%urld. ( hue of the few %vho
stayed on %%as 1.2It1'I' 61 5, in a hotel near
Montego Bay; he lust must of his antenna
and some of the walls of his hotel room,
but managed to make reports. He and the
others in the area would find themselves
overburdened shorty with disaster -relief
and health -and -welfare communications.
Next on Gilbert's agenda was the
Cayman chain. Located just south of
Cuba, they look a glancing blow of some
140 mph from Gilbert. 1 here were no
casualties in the chain, but there was, of
course, some damage. Because of the path
of the storm near Cuba, warnings were
likewise up in that country. In the past,
there was rarely any contact between HWN
and Cuban amateurs. For Gilbert,
however, there were frequent and regular
reports through CO2KK and other
amateurs of conditions ashore and, more
importantly, reports from Cuban radar,
detailing the conditions and movements of
the eye of Gilbert to the Hurricane Center.
This caused, great excitement among the
leadership of the NHC and became an in-
centive for the members of the HWN. All
political differences were put aside; we were
"colegas" once again.
Ahead lay the Yucatan peninsula. Behind
lay the ruins of Jamaica, the damage on the
Cayman group and Cuba, the minor gales
in the Florida Keys and the Bahamas. The
dead and injured in the islands on the
northern tier of the Caribbean were being
tended to and life there was returning more
or less to normal. Coming along in the
wake of the storm was yet another surprise
for the HWN and listeners. A British Naval
Frigate, the HMS Active, was enroute to
Georgetown, Cayman Islands, to render as-
sistance. She made and maintained contact
with the island through the HWN, ZF1RC,
and others.
Also ahead lay the deepening of the
central pressure to a new world -record low,
for a hurricane, of 885 millibars, second
only to Super Typhoon Tip near the
Philippines in 1979. Mindful of the impor-
tance of strict radio discipline and the ever-
increasing need for Amateur Radio com-
munications, the Director of the National
Hurricane Center requested the FCC to
declare an emergency on 14.325 MHz for
weather-related work and on 14.275 MHz
for disaster relief in already stricken areas.
It was quickly granted and broadcast by
WIAW in official bulletins; all of this was
in accordance with long-established plans
and Part 97.107 of the FCC Rules. This
particular paragraph is apparently unknown
to many amateurs and should be studied
by all those who wish to participate in the
future of emergency communications.
With the persistent storm bearing down
a
11
a
k
B
of
bh
01
to
in
w,
of
en
ht
ar
let
R:
ex
ex
co
set
Se
H;
Ca
a
be
of
pr
let
du
kr
ap
fa
M
IC
wi
en
on the Yucatan, the local officials required
evacuations and thereby prevented any loss
of life in the many tourist arcus. This
evacuation resulted in tremendous dif-
ficulties for families looking for health -
and -welfare reports. The northern tip of
the Yucatan, including the resorts on
Cancun and Cozumel, was hit very hard.
Most of the amateurs that had been on fre-
quency earlier were forced off the air by
loss of power or antennas, making commu-
nications with the area nearly impossible
for some time. But Gilbert was hardly
finished with his assault on Mexico. Ahead
lay the upper Gulf Coast of Mexico and the
southern coast of Texas. Warnings went up
from Port O'Connor to Tampico, with
watches and boaters' advisories further east
along the Gulf Coast. Brownsville was
mentioned as the probable landfall.
In fact, the storm refused to follow the
computer models which suggested he would
turn northwesterly, but rather continued on
a path that caused him to plow into the
Mexican coast, just over 100 miles south of
Brownsville. Luckily, Gilbert had lost much
of his punch and was back up to a modest -
but -still -powerful 948 millibars, with winds
of 120 mi/h. The winds were hard enough
to take; it was the rains in excess of 20 inches
inland, and the numerous tornadoes in
Mexico and Texas, that caused the most
grief. Indeed, hundreds died and many
were injured or left homeless in the wake
of this ferocious storm.
Following the effects of a severe
emergency situation, ARRL HQ receives
hundreds of articles, newspaper clippings
and accolades in the form of personal
letters extolling the virtues of the Amateur
Radio Service's capabilities. Gilbert was no
exception, of course. What follows are
excerpts of some of the typical letters and
comments that serve to illustrate the superb
service that many amateurs provided.
Senator Lauds Local Rabbi After
Hurricane Disaster
Rabbi Kenneth L. Cohen, NI3F, of
Columbia, Maryland, was presented with
a certificate in honor of his efforts on
behalf of the people of Jamaica in the wake
of Hurricane Gilbert. The award was
presented by Senator Barbara Mikulski.
"I wanted to take this opportunity and
let you know what a terrific job you did
during Hurricane Gilbert in Jamaica. I
know many people here in the States
appreciated the messages you relayed from
family mcmbers in the Caribbean,"
Mikulski said. "It is inspiring to know that
people such as you, Rabbi Cohen, are
willing to unselfishly give their time and
energy during a crisis situation."
"1 accept this award on behalf of the
men and women of the Amateur Radio
fraternity here and around the world, who
offer their talent and equipment for the
public service," Cohen said.
Other Exemplary Examples
Amateurs in the United States weren't
the only ones, of course, who provided
appropriate public-service communications
before, during and after Gilbert.
"Australian and New Zealand stations
were heard relaying messages of assistance
during times that Jamaicans were unable
to contact North America as a result of
varying radio conditions. In Australia, the
national media, particularly radio stations,
had generated some 100 health -and -welfare
inquiries for Jamaica from the public. Due
to a lack of (Australian) third -party agree-
ments, all such messages were sent to
Jamaica via the US. Australia has a third -
party agreement with the US, and the US
has a third -party agreement with Jamaica.
This meant that Australian amateurs were
able to provide service directly to the public
without the normal delays which are
involved in establishing such agreements.
The Radio Society of Great Britain (RSGB)
activated and provided official assistance
to the British High Commission as well as
handling health -and -welfare inquiries into
and out of Jamaica to the UK. In Germany,
amateurs provided that country's communi-
cations for Jamaican public health and wel-
fare. Belgium and Sweden were also in-
volved in health -and -welfare traffic,
alleviating the worries of some seriously ill
people, whose concern and lack of news
about loved ones was indeed threatening to
their own well-being."—S. Voron, VK2BVS
Some Amateur Radio operators even
had the means of traveling directly to the
disaster area to provide equipment and
communications skills.
"On September 17th, the International
Amateur Radio Network (IARN) requested
that W4PJS and I proceed to Jamaica to
furnish much-needed radio communica-
tions for the Salvation Army in Kingston.
We were met at the Montego Bay airport
by representatives of the Salvation Army,
only to discover that customs took a dim
view of bringing two-way radio equipment
into their country. After cooling our heels
for two days, we were finally given permis-
sion to put our radio equipment on a plane
and accompany it to Kingston. We arrived
at the Salvation Army headquarters build-
ing to discover that the roof had been
completely destroyed. We were given a
nearby temporary building to set up our
base of operations. We hastily put up our
20 -meter dipole and soon were in com-
munications. After a little over a week's
operations of handling priority messages,
Boxer County, Texas EC Ken Harwood,
WASQZI, sending message traffic from the
San Antonio Red Cross Chapter of the
American Red Cross, where the San
Antonio Club station, W5SC, is located.
communications capabilities of the country
returned to near-normal and Graham and
I left to return to our homes in the States."
—Albert Vayhinger, W9ELR/6Y5RO
"After Jamaica was hit by a devastating
hurricane, our objective was to provide
additional Amateur Radio communications
into the country. As a member of a
medical -relief team, 1 was sponsored and
able to gain entrance into Jamaica. 1
brought with me my communications
equipment, which consisted of a Kenwood
TS -830S and a 3 -element beam. My primary
responsibility was to support the medical
clinic with daily radio transmissions to the
Oral Roberts Medical Center in Tulsa,
Oklahoma, via the International Amateur
Radio Network. This was accomplished by
checking into the IARN on 14.275 and
making contact with the Medical Univer-
sity Center. Daily transmissions into ORU
consisted of medical updates on the con-
ditions of the community, especially the
high probability of outbreaks of cholera
and typhoid, in addition to health -and -
welfare traffic to the families of the medical
relief team."—Bill Theodorou, WB2TUU
It is times of disaster like Gilbert that
should give us all pause. In such instances,
it is heartening to know that the corps of
dedicated hams within and outside of the
US can—and do—provide Amateur Radio
communications systems that can be
activated when regular channels upon
which we rely are knocked out. Irl
Febtvary 1988 17
on the Yucatan, the local officials required
evacuations and thereby prevented any loss
of life in the many tourist arcus. This
evacuation resulted in tremendous dif-
ficulties for families looking for health -
and -welfare reports. The northern tip of
the Yucatan, including the resorts on
Cancun and Cozumel, was hit very hard.
Most of the amateurs that had been on fre-
quency earlier were forced off the air by
loss of power or antennas, making commu-
nications with the area nearly impossible
for some time. But Gilbert was hardly
finished with his assault on Mexico. Ahead
lay the upper Gulf Coast of Mexico and the
southern coast of Texas. Warnings went up
from Port O'Connor to Tampico, with
watches and boaters' advisories further east
along the Gulf Coast. Brownsville was
mentioned as the probable landfall.
In fact, the storm refused to follow the
computer models which suggested he would
turn northwesterly, but rather continued on
a path that caused him to plow into the
Mexican coast, just over 100 miles south of
Brownsville. Luckily, Gilbert had lost much
of his punch and was back up to a modest -
but -still -powerful 948 millibars, with winds
of 120 mi/h. The winds were hard enough
to take; it was the rains in excess of 20 inches
inland, and the numerous tornadoes in
Mexico and Texas, that caused the most
grief. Indeed, hundreds died and many
were injured or left homeless in the wake
of this ferocious storm.
Following the effects of a severe
emergency situation, ARRL HQ receives
hundreds of articles, newspaper clippings
and accolades in the form of personal
letters extolling the virtues of the Amateur
Radio Service's capabilities. Gilbert was no
exception, of course. What follows are
excerpts of some of the typical letters and
comments that serve to illustrate the superb
service that many amateurs provided.
Senator Lauds Local Rabbi After
Hurricane Disaster
Rabbi Kenneth L. Cohen, NI3F, of
Columbia, Maryland, was presented with
a certificate in honor of his efforts on
behalf of the people of Jamaica in the wake
of Hurricane Gilbert. The award was
presented by Senator Barbara Mikulski.
"I wanted to take this opportunity and
let you know what a terrific job you did
during Hurricane Gilbert in Jamaica. I
know many people here in the States
appreciated the messages you relayed from
family mcmbers in the Caribbean,"
Mikulski said. "It is inspiring to know that
people such as you, Rabbi Cohen, are
willing to unselfishly give their time and
energy during a crisis situation."
"1 accept this award on behalf of the
men and women of the Amateur Radio
fraternity here and around the world, who
offer their talent and equipment for the
public service," Cohen said.
Other Exemplary Examples
Amateurs in the United States weren't
the only ones, of course, who provided
appropriate public-service communications
before, during and after Gilbert.
"Australian and New Zealand stations
were heard relaying messages of assistance
during times that Jamaicans were unable
to contact North America as a result of
varying radio conditions. In Australia, the
national media, particularly radio stations,
had generated some 100 health -and -welfare
inquiries for Jamaica from the public. Due
to a lack of (Australian) third -party agree-
ments, all such messages were sent to
Jamaica via the US. Australia has a third -
party agreement with the US, and the US
has a third -party agreement with Jamaica.
This meant that Australian amateurs were
able to provide service directly to the public
without the normal delays which are
involved in establishing such agreements.
The Radio Society of Great Britain (RSGB)
activated and provided official assistance
to the British High Commission as well as
handling health -and -welfare inquiries into
and out of Jamaica to the UK. In Germany,
amateurs provided that country's communi-
cations for Jamaican public health and wel-
fare. Belgium and Sweden were also in-
volved in health -and -welfare traffic,
alleviating the worries of some seriously ill
people, whose concern and lack of news
about loved ones was indeed threatening to
their own well-being."—S. Voron, VK2BVS
Some Amateur Radio operators even
had the means of traveling directly to the
disaster area to provide equipment and
communications skills.
"On September 17th, the International
Amateur Radio Network (IARN) requested
that W4PJS and I proceed to Jamaica to
furnish much-needed radio communica-
tions for the Salvation Army in Kingston.
We were met at the Montego Bay airport
by representatives of the Salvation Army,
only to discover that customs took a dim
view of bringing two-way radio equipment
into their country. After cooling our heels
for two days, we were finally given permis-
sion to put our radio equipment on a plane
and accompany it to Kingston. We arrived
at the Salvation Army headquarters build-
ing to discover that the roof had been
completely destroyed. We were given a
nearby temporary building to set up our
base of operations. We hastily put up our
20 -meter dipole and soon were in com-
munications. After a little over a week's
operations of handling priority messages,
Boxer County, Texas EC Ken Harwood,
WASQZI, sending message traffic from the
San Antonio Red Cross Chapter of the
American Red Cross, where the San
Antonio Club station, W5SC, is located.
communications capabilities of the country
returned to near-normal and Graham and
I left to return to our homes in the States."
—Albert Vayhinger, W9ELR/6Y5RO
"After Jamaica was hit by a devastating
hurricane, our objective was to provide
additional Amateur Radio communications
into the country. As a member of a
medical -relief team, 1 was sponsored and
able to gain entrance into Jamaica. 1
brought with me my communications
equipment, which consisted of a Kenwood
TS -830S and a 3 -element beam. My primary
responsibility was to support the medical
clinic with daily radio transmissions to the
Oral Roberts Medical Center in Tulsa,
Oklahoma, via the International Amateur
Radio Network. This was accomplished by
checking into the IARN on 14.275 and
making contact with the Medical Univer-
sity Center. Daily transmissions into ORU
consisted of medical updates on the con-
ditions of the community, especially the
high probability of outbreaks of cholera
and typhoid, in addition to health -and -
welfare traffic to the families of the medical
relief team."—Bill Theodorou, WB2TUU
It is times of disaster like Gilbert that
should give us all pause. In such instances,
it is heartening to know that the corps of
dedicated hams within and outside of the
US can—and do—provide Amateur Radio
communications systems that can be
activated when regular channels upon
which we rely are knocked out. Irl
Febtvary 1988 17
EMBASSY OF JAMAICA
%you K STREET. N.W.
tUITI 416
WA$N1NGTuN. D.C. WXMI
TILIMIONC. taoat 4112-011110
fel NO.
December 2, 1988
The President
American Radio Relay League
Newington, CONN 06111
Dear President:
I write to express sincere appreciation and thanks to
the many members of your organization who gave much needed
assistance in our effort to send and receive information to
and from Jamaica, during the recent disaster created by
Hurricane Gilbert.
It is my understanding that all across the United States,
amateur radio operators sought to use their facilities to assist
communities and individuals desirous of obtaining information
on the situation in Jamaica.
Please convey our gratitude and very best wishes to your
membership through the appropriate media, on behalf of the
Government and People of Jamaica.
Sincerely
Amines dor
Exhibit
C-2
EMBASSY OF JAMAICA
%you K STREET. N.W.
tUITI 416
WA$N1NGTuN. D.C. WXMI
TILIMIONC. taoat 4112-011110
fel NO.
December 2, 1988
The President
American Radio Relay League
Newington, CONN 06111
Dear President:
I write to express sincere appreciation and thanks to
the many members of your organization who gave much needed
assistance in our effort to send and receive information to
and from Jamaica, during the recent disaster created by
Hurricane Gilbert.
It is my understanding that all across the United States,
amateur radio operators sought to use their facilities to assist
communities and individuals desirous of obtaining information
on the situation in Jamaica.
Please convey our gratitude and very best wishes to your
membership through the appropriate media, on behalf of the
Government and People of Jamaica.
Sincerely
Amines dor
Exhibit
C-2
VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1
JANUARY 1990
Hugo, San Francisco Close Decade
Mother Nature heralded the end of the '80s in a big way: First,
Hurricane Hugo pulverizes the Caribbean and South Carolina coast,
extending amateurs to the limit. Then, the second of the one-two
punch, a 7.0 Richter rocker hits San Francisco only weeks later.
Amateur Radio met the test, however: Puerto Rico Section
Manager Alberto Validejuli, WP4CSG, concluded "Ham radio was
vital to Government and welfare agencies during this emergency.
Thanks to ham radio, Civil Defense, Red Cross and National Guard
had effective relief communications in all the affected areas."
Division Vice Director Jimmy Walker, WD4HLZ, issued thanks to
all amateurs who offered assistance. "Hugo was a challenge and
Amateur Radio met that challenge." Not perfect, especially with
respect to the health -and -welfare traffic situation, the overall effort
has been evaluated by the ARRL National Emergency Response
Committee to Identify areas for Improvement. ANERCOM met in
Newington November 1.
Amateurs provided communications to the earthquake -stricken
San Francisco area In the aftermath of the October disaster that
caused widespread damage in northern California. ARRL Section
Managers Dick Wilson, K6LRN (San Francisco), Bob Vallio, W6RGG
(East Bay) and Glenn Thomas, WB6W (Santa Clara Valley) reported
that local amateur emergency nets on the 2 -meter and 220 -MHz
bands were In full swing, providing on-site emergency communica-
tion assistance. The extensive packet network in the San Francisco
area was dedicated to handling the heavy volume of health -and -
welfare traffic.
Both events prompted the Field Services staff to exercise an evolv-
ing emergency operations plan, with good results according to
ANERCOM and others. Staff concentrated on 1) maintaining solid
contact with key League officials in or near the disaster areas,
N6VAW assists an operator at Marina Middle
School shelter In San Francisco. (KC6AAN photo)
Fillmore street in San Francisco, once a bustling neighborhood,
now faces rebuilding and rehabllitadon to bring it back. •
(KC6AAN photo)
KC6AAN operates out of a car in front o1
Moscone Convention Center shelter.
(N6VAW ohotol
VOLUME 6 NUMBER 1
JANUARY 1990
Hugo, San Francisco Close Decade
Mother Nature heralded the end of the '80s in a big way: First,
Hurricane Hugo pulverizes the Caribbean and South Carolina coast,
extending amateurs to the limit. Then, the second of the one-two
punch, a 7.0 Richter rocker hits San Francisco only weeks later.
Amateur Radio met the test, however: Puerto Rico Section
Manager Alberto Validejuli, WP4CSG, concluded "Ham radio was
vital to Government and welfare agencies during this emergency.
Thanks to ham radio, Civil Defense, Red Cross and National Guard
had effective relief communications in all the affected areas."
Division Vice Director Jimmy Walker, WD4HLZ, issued thanks to
all amateurs who offered assistance. "Hugo was a challenge and
Amateur Radio met that challenge." Not perfect, especially with
respect to the health -and -welfare traffic situation, the overall effort
has been evaluated by the ARRL National Emergency Response
Committee to Identify areas for Improvement. ANERCOM met in
Newington November 1.
Amateurs provided communications to the earthquake -stricken
San Francisco area In the aftermath of the October disaster that
caused widespread damage in northern California. ARRL Section
Managers Dick Wilson, K6LRN (San Francisco), Bob Vallio, W6RGG
(East Bay) and Glenn Thomas, WB6W (Santa Clara Valley) reported
that local amateur emergency nets on the 2 -meter and 220 -MHz
bands were In full swing, providing on-site emergency communica-
tion assistance. The extensive packet network in the San Francisco
area was dedicated to handling the heavy volume of health -and -
welfare traffic.
Both events prompted the Field Services staff to exercise an evolv-
ing emergency operations plan, with good results according to
ANERCOM and others. Staff concentrated on 1) maintaining solid
contact with key League officials in or near the disaster areas,
N6VAW assists an operator at Marina Middle
School shelter In San Francisco. (KC6AAN photo)
Fillmore street in San Francisco, once a bustling neighborhood,
now faces rebuilding and rehabllitadon to bring it back. •
(KC6AAN photo)
KC6AAN operates out of a car in front o1
Moscone Convention Center shelter.
(N6VAW ohotol
1
Earthquake Packet Operations: Lessons Lammed
Lew Jenkin, N6VV, is a member of the Northern California
Packet Association which is comprised of an extensive packet
network made up of hilltop node locations and over 30 BBS
systems spread from Redding'inthe far northern part of
California to Kern County in the central part of the state.
As one of the packet bulletin board system operators
(SYSOP) for the network, Lew was involved in handling heavy
amounts of health and welfare traffic generated immediately
after the October earthquake in the San Francisco Bay area.
After the dust had settled a,'bit, Lew wrote down his
thoughts about the performance of the packet network and
lessons learned from the emergency created by the earth-
quake. Here is a summary of his observations and recommen-
dations:
• Have a network backup plan in place in anticipation of
emergency situations.
• Packet is well designed to handle high volumes o1 Health
and Welfare traffic during emergencies. Tactical communica-
tions, however, are better handled by voice.
• Because of networking possibilities, packet networks can
respond better than any other form of amateur communica-
tions to changes in the emergency situations. Members of
Northern Califomia Packet Association were able to completely
reroute traffic throughout the entire system In fess than
3 hours.
• There is a need for an emergency bulletin designator,
supported, but used only in extreme emergencies.
• Every amateur using packet bulletin boards should be
familiar with packet NTS procedures. Circumstances generated
by the earthquake required as many hams as possible with
packet capability to become involved with handling traffic.
• All NTS traffic should be ZIP code routed. A major
problem was misaddressed or non -addressed tralfio requiring
manual intervention.
Lew feels that the San Francisco earthquake was "the first
great test for this new packet technology" and In general,
passed the test with flying colors under what at times seemed
like an impossible situation.
As of October 21, approximately 3000 health and welfare
messages were posted on the N6W bulletin board. 2200 of
them had been delivered. All 01 the messages were, at one
point, carried through the network on 220.90 MHz.
2) handling their requests for.issistance including equipment,
3) getting and processing reliable information from monitoring and
telephone communication, and transmitting advisories in a timely
manner via regular W1AW bulletins, 4) answering telephone calls
from the field and 5) providing national and local media support.
Section Manager Valtdejuli said "I wish to express my apprecia-
tion to (HO staff) for their most decided assistance in this moment
of need. Without their assistance our efforts would not have resulted
to be as effective as they were."
Heroics were much in evidence as ARES members stayed by their
rigs despite increasing danger. Watch for the complete story of these
ham heroes in February and March QST.
1
Earthquake Packet Operations: Lessons Lammed
Lew Jenkin, N6VV, is a member of the Northern California
Packet Association which is comprised of an extensive packet
network made up of hilltop node locations and over 30 BBS
systems spread from Redding'inthe far northern part of
California to Kern County in the central part of the state.
As one of the packet bulletin board system operators
(SYSOP) for the network, Lew was involved in handling heavy
amounts of health and welfare traffic generated immediately
after the October earthquake in the San Francisco Bay area.
After the dust had settled a,'bit, Lew wrote down his
thoughts about the performance of the packet network and
lessons learned from the emergency created by the earth-
quake. Here is a summary of his observations and recommen-
dations:
• Have a network backup plan in place in anticipation of
emergency situations.
• Packet is well designed to handle high volumes o1 Health
and Welfare traffic during emergencies. Tactical communica-
tions, however, are better handled by voice.
• Because of networking possibilities, packet networks can
respond better than any other form of amateur communica-
tions to changes in the emergency situations. Members of
Northern Califomia Packet Association were able to completely
reroute traffic throughout the entire system In fess than
3 hours.
• There is a need for an emergency bulletin designator,
supported, but used only in extreme emergencies.
• Every amateur using packet bulletin boards should be
familiar with packet NTS procedures. Circumstances generated
by the earthquake required as many hams as possible with
packet capability to become involved with handling traffic.
• All NTS traffic should be ZIP code routed. A major
problem was misaddressed or non -addressed tralfio requiring
manual intervention.
Lew feels that the San Francisco earthquake was "the first
great test for this new packet technology" and In general,
passed the test with flying colors under what at times seemed
like an impossible situation.
As of October 21, approximately 3000 health and welfare
messages were posted on the N6W bulletin board. 2200 of
them had been delivered. All 01 the messages were, at one
point, carried through the network on 220.90 MHz.
2) handling their requests for.issistance including equipment,
3) getting and processing reliable information from monitoring and
telephone communication, and transmitting advisories in a timely
manner via regular W1AW bulletins, 4) answering telephone calls
from the field and 5) providing national and local media support.
Section Manager Valtdejuli said "I wish to express my apprecia-
tion to (HO staff) for their most decided assistance in this moment
of need. Without their assistance our efforts would not have resulted
to be as effective as they were."
Heroics were much in evidence as ARES members stayed by their
rigs despite increasing danger. Watch for the complete story of these
ham heroes in February and March QST.
lister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ,
1988 ARRL International Humanitarian
By Richard K. Palm, K1 CE
Field Services Manager
From an austere room in the heart of Mid-
dle America, a Franeia•an nun arts as "a
winders 011 the world" to those who can-
not see it themselves and as a lifeline to those
who do.
These words, appearing in a Minnesota
newspaper article, describe the mission of
Sister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ. The
ARRL Board recognizes Sister Alverna's mis-
sion of helping others and has selected her as
the 1988 ARRL International Humanitarian.
Sister Alverna was instrumental in the cre-
ation of the Courage HANDI-HAM System,
having been one of the very first nuns to work
with System founder Ned Carman, WOZSW,
in Rochester, Minnesota. It was largely Sister
Alverna's constant enthusiasm, coupled with
Ned's skill at involving volunteers, that led
to her being such an important part of help-
ing the handicapped through Amateur Radio.
Courage HANDI-HAM System's Bruce
Humphrys, KOHR, said, "We in the Courage
HANDI-HAM System, and we in the inter-
national radio amateur community, are
blessed by Sister Alverna O'Laughlin's quiet
but firm manner. As the HANDI-HAM
System's Educational Services Coordinator,
she has consistently improved the lives of
handicapped radio amateurs and students of
haat radio throughout the world. She has
unmatched integrity and the respect of all who
know her."
Her first exposure to Amateur Radio came
from Sister Judith Simon, WAOQVN.
"Fascinated by the key and oscillator she
stored in the closet in my department, 1
decided to surprise her by learning the Morse
code," she said. It wasn't long before she was
ready to send her first CW message to Sister
Judith. At this point, Sister Alverna learned
that sending the code was one thing; receiv-
ing it was quite another.
She started studying for her Novice license,
although she wasn't sure exactly why, until
she met Ned Carman, WOZSW, an instruc-
tor at the Rochester (MN) Amateur Radio
Club. Ned spoke of his dream to help the han-
dicapped become radio amateurs. Productive
activities for the physically disabled had long
interested Sister Alverna, and for her, this
idea suddenly added a new dimension to
Amateur Radio.
For Sister Alverna, Amateur Radio and the
HANDI-HAM System are virtually one and
the same. In the early years, she spent long
hours working with others on the affairs of
the young organization. It was trial and
error, but it grew and flourished.
J
glift
aatt3,�; ��,,
140
Sister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ
In her present position of Educational Ser-
vices Coordinator, Sister Alverna works with
the system's student coordinators to assess
each student's educational needs, then
designs, packages and mails out the appro-
priate learning materials. She also is respon-
sible for staying in touch with each of the
organization's students and members. Her
Typical day includes everything from mailing
out instructional tapes to hlind students to
wilting :uncles los the ncwslcttes,
HA NUI -HAM World.
Her International Mission Radio Associa-
tion activities have included serving :ss net
control. She checked into other interna-
tional nets regularly and has often made
phone patches for sisters located in South
America. She kept weekly phone -patch sched-
ules for a young Honduran hospitalized in
Minnesota for almost a year.
She views her involvement in the 1MRA
and the Courage HANDI-HAM System as a
way of filling her vows. "That's the thrust
of the religious life—to help those who have
needs. Through Amateur Radio we open the
window of the world to people who may never
get to leave their homes because of their dis-
abilities," said Sister Alverna.
There is no single event in Sister Alverna's
life which points directly to her high qualifica-
tions as the ARRL Board of Directors' choice
for the 1988 International Humanitarian
Award. Rather, it is her entire life which lays
eloquent testimony to her compassion, en-
thusiasm for the joys of Amateur Radio and
her dedication to sharing those joys with
everyone she contacts.
The ARRL International Humanitarian Award
The Humanitarian Award is dedicated to recognizing amateurs who, through
Amateur Radio, assist people in need throughout the world, promoting the wel-
fare of mankind. This annual prize is awarded to truly outstanding amateurs for
work in international humanitarianism and furtherance of peace.
Any licensed amateur worldwide, or group of amateurs who, by use of his or
her Amateur Radio skills, have provided extraordinary service for the benefit of
others in times of crisis or disaster, is also eligible to receive the award.
Nominations for the 1989 award will be accepted by HQ from a licensed radio
amateur, governmental or any other organization which has received the
benefits of the radio amateur's extraordinary service. For more information on
nomination requirements, contact ARRL HQ. The deadline for receipt of nomina-
tions is June 1, 1990.
Expand Your World
People with physical handicaps or sensory impairments the world over have
discovered how Amateur Radio opens doors to exciting, challenging and
rewarding experiences. A world that might be bound by four bedroom walls can
be expanded to the farthest reaches of the earth.
HANDI-HAM members are individuals with physical handicaps or sensory im-
pairments who are studying for their licenses, and those who have already
obtained them; membership also includes disabled and nondisabled hams who
volunteer their time, effort and services to help the students.
Others help by donating money and equipment. Courage HANDI-HAM System
is a nonprofit organization and all donations are tax-deductible. Contact the
HANDI-HAMs at Courage Center, 3915 Golden Valley Rd, Golden Valley, MN
55422.
1988 ARRL International Humanitarian Sister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ,
adds, "I receive much more than I give. If you too wish to receive by giving, join
the HANDI-HAM S stem."
Exhibit
January 1990 53
lister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ,
1988 ARRL International Humanitarian
By Richard K. Palm, K1 CE
Field Services Manager
From an austere room in the heart of Mid-
dle America, a Franeia•an nun arts as "a
winders 011 the world" to those who can-
not see it themselves and as a lifeline to those
who do.
These words, appearing in a Minnesota
newspaper article, describe the mission of
Sister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ. The
ARRL Board recognizes Sister Alverna's mis-
sion of helping others and has selected her as
the 1988 ARRL International Humanitarian.
Sister Alverna was instrumental in the cre-
ation of the Courage HANDI-HAM System,
having been one of the very first nuns to work
with System founder Ned Carman, WOZSW,
in Rochester, Minnesota. It was largely Sister
Alverna's constant enthusiasm, coupled with
Ned's skill at involving volunteers, that led
to her being such an important part of help-
ing the handicapped through Amateur Radio.
Courage HANDI-HAM System's Bruce
Humphrys, KOHR, said, "We in the Courage
HANDI-HAM System, and we in the inter-
national radio amateur community, are
blessed by Sister Alverna O'Laughlin's quiet
but firm manner. As the HANDI-HAM
System's Educational Services Coordinator,
she has consistently improved the lives of
handicapped radio amateurs and students of
haat radio throughout the world. She has
unmatched integrity and the respect of all who
know her."
Her first exposure to Amateur Radio came
from Sister Judith Simon, WAOQVN.
"Fascinated by the key and oscillator she
stored in the closet in my department, 1
decided to surprise her by learning the Morse
code," she said. It wasn't long before she was
ready to send her first CW message to Sister
Judith. At this point, Sister Alverna learned
that sending the code was one thing; receiv-
ing it was quite another.
She started studying for her Novice license,
although she wasn't sure exactly why, until
she met Ned Carman, WOZSW, an instruc-
tor at the Rochester (MN) Amateur Radio
Club. Ned spoke of his dream to help the han-
dicapped become radio amateurs. Productive
activities for the physically disabled had long
interested Sister Alverna, and for her, this
idea suddenly added a new dimension to
Amateur Radio.
For Sister Alverna, Amateur Radio and the
HANDI-HAM System are virtually one and
the same. In the early years, she spent long
hours working with others on the affairs of
the young organization. It was trial and
error, but it grew and flourished.
J
glift
aatt3,�; ��,,
140
Sister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ
In her present position of Educational Ser-
vices Coordinator, Sister Alverna works with
the system's student coordinators to assess
each student's educational needs, then
designs, packages and mails out the appro-
priate learning materials. She also is respon-
sible for staying in touch with each of the
organization's students and members. Her
Typical day includes everything from mailing
out instructional tapes to hlind students to
wilting :uncles los the ncwslcttes,
HA NUI -HAM World.
Her International Mission Radio Associa-
tion activities have included serving :ss net
control. She checked into other interna-
tional nets regularly and has often made
phone patches for sisters located in South
America. She kept weekly phone -patch sched-
ules for a young Honduran hospitalized in
Minnesota for almost a year.
She views her involvement in the 1MRA
and the Courage HANDI-HAM System as a
way of filling her vows. "That's the thrust
of the religious life—to help those who have
needs. Through Amateur Radio we open the
window of the world to people who may never
get to leave their homes because of their dis-
abilities," said Sister Alverna.
There is no single event in Sister Alverna's
life which points directly to her high qualifica-
tions as the ARRL Board of Directors' choice
for the 1988 International Humanitarian
Award. Rather, it is her entire life which lays
eloquent testimony to her compassion, en-
thusiasm for the joys of Amateur Radio and
her dedication to sharing those joys with
everyone she contacts.
The ARRL International Humanitarian Award
The Humanitarian Award is dedicated to recognizing amateurs who, through
Amateur Radio, assist people in need throughout the world, promoting the wel-
fare of mankind. This annual prize is awarded to truly outstanding amateurs for
work in international humanitarianism and furtherance of peace.
Any licensed amateur worldwide, or group of amateurs who, by use of his or
her Amateur Radio skills, have provided extraordinary service for the benefit of
others in times of crisis or disaster, is also eligible to receive the award.
Nominations for the 1989 award will be accepted by HQ from a licensed radio
amateur, governmental or any other organization which has received the
benefits of the radio amateur's extraordinary service. For more information on
nomination requirements, contact ARRL HQ. The deadline for receipt of nomina-
tions is June 1, 1990.
Expand Your World
People with physical handicaps or sensory impairments the world over have
discovered how Amateur Radio opens doors to exciting, challenging and
rewarding experiences. A world that might be bound by four bedroom walls can
be expanded to the farthest reaches of the earth.
HANDI-HAM members are individuals with physical handicaps or sensory im-
pairments who are studying for their licenses, and those who have already
obtained them; membership also includes disabled and nondisabled hams who
volunteer their time, effort and services to help the students.
Others help by donating money and equipment. Courage HANDI-HAM System
is a nonprofit organization and all donations are tax-deductible. Contact the
HANDI-HAMs at Courage Center, 3915 Golden Valley Rd, Golden Valley, MN
55422.
1988 ARRL International Humanitarian Sister Alverna O'Laughlin, WAOSGJ,
adds, "I receive much more than I give. If you too wish to receive by giving, join
the HANDI-HAM S stem."
Exhibit
January 1990 53
Public Service
Conducted By Luck Hurder, KY1T
Deputy Manager. Field Services Department. ARRL
Hams Are the Key Factor in NDMS Drill
By Sylvia Pentel, KBBDQB
Massive earthquake, registering 8.0 on the
Richter Scale, hits Sacramento area of
California and causes thousands of deaths
and tens of thousands of injured. Power
and phone lines down.
What would be your reaction to this
announcement, had it been the real thing?
It was only a test of the National Disaster
Medical System (NDMS), but it could
happen. Would you be ready? Could you
operate under stress? Who would know
that you are available?
The NDMS held an emergency drill on
April 22, 1989, to test the capabilities and
coordination of the many groups and
organizations which would be activated
should a real disaster occur.
If a major catastrophic event did take
place, the area would be declared a federal
disaster by the President of the United
States, and the NDMS would become
involved, providing assistance such as
evacuation of the injured to various
hospitals. There are over 100,000 precom-
mitted beds available at any one given time
in the US.
From the United States Air Force
Reserve Base in Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Mr Ed Lord, NDMS area director, coor-
dinated the largest emergency exercise
attempted in US history. In cooperation
with Chicago and Indianapolis, "patients"
were flown in two Hercules C -130s from
Minneapolis to Chicago, two C -130s flew
to Indianapolis with patients and "next of
kin," and two additional planes with
patients were flown from Chicago to
Minneapolis—a total of six planes involved
in the drill.
When the patients arrived in Minneapolis,
they were prioritized by degree of injury
(triage) and sent by ambulance or medical
helicopter to assigned hospitals where they
were "treated" by medical personnel.
Chicago and Indianapolis followed similar
procedures.
A large network of Amateur Radio
operators provided communications, link-
ing the Minneapolis/St Paul area, Chicago,
Indianapolis, Philadelphia, Des Moines,
Sacramento, San Francisco and a dozen
cities in Minnesota. Several modes of
communication were utilized, including
phone, AMTOR, packet radio and amateur
TV. In the Twin Cities alone, there were
100 operators. One hundred -two were
scheduled, with 100 actually participating
—an astounding percentage that proved the
dedication of the amateurs. All ages and
walks of life were represented in the exer-
cise, including an eleven -year-old General
class operator, many senior citizens and
several disabled persons, including a blind
person and one control operator with
cerebral palsy.
Amateurs assisted the American Red
Cross with their disaster welfare inquiries
and provided packet communications from
the communications van at the air base in
Minneapolis to the Red Cross in St Paul.
AMTOR was utilized to relay data between
Indianapolis, St Cloud, and St Paul.
Fast -scan television was used throughout
the hangar with monitors in the communi-
cations command post, command center
command post and the state capitol EOC.
Transmission and reception at the air base
was excellent and exceeded our expecta-
tions. Video reception at the state capitol
was very good. ATV will definitely be a
part of future drills. Previously, there
wasn't a way for the NDMS director, the
communications coordinator and others to
observe the activities while in the command
center. With Amateur Radio communica-
tions in the director's command center,
requests could be made to the ATV control
center to switch to cameras in various
areas, allowing those in the van to be kept
up-to-date on the activities.
The teamwork among the hams was ex-
cellent; they were well-prepared and effi-
cient. There were problem areas, certainly;
delays and mix-ups are a part of life, but
resolving them proved to us that we could
improvise and rectify situations in order to
get things running smoothly.
On the humorous side, there was a Little
comic relief in the morgue area of the
hangar when a "dead" patient opened his
eyes and said to the nearby ham operator,
"Find me a clergyman for my last rites."
So the ham looked at the corpse's dog tags
and asked, "What kind of a Protestant are
you?" "Methodist," said the dead man.
The ham then agreed to find a chaplain,
at which time the dead man asked, "Could
you have him bring me a turkey sandwich
while he's at it? I haven't eaten since before
dawn." This particular person "died"
twice due to an error in the patient -tracking
area. We couldn't help but wonder if it was
the turkey sandwich that did him in the
second time.
A few individuals felt that there should
John Post, KE7AX (r), takes patient information in the medical
transportation area at the USAF reserve base in Minneapolis.
(photos KBBDQB)
68 OS&
ATV cameraman Mike Bingham, WDOFUV, focuses on a
ambulance crew transporting a patient. Fast -scan television al -
towed the NDMS director and the communications coordinator to
observe the activities while in the command center.
)
Public Service
Conducted By Luck Hurder, KY1T
Deputy Manager. Field Services Department. ARRL
Hams Are the Key Factor in NDMS Drill
By Sylvia Pentel, KBBDQB
Massive earthquake, registering 8.0 on the
Richter Scale, hits Sacramento area of
California and causes thousands of deaths
and tens of thousands of injured. Power
and phone lines down.
What would be your reaction to this
announcement, had it been the real thing?
It was only a test of the National Disaster
Medical System (NDMS), but it could
happen. Would you be ready? Could you
operate under stress? Who would know
that you are available?
The NDMS held an emergency drill on
April 22, 1989, to test the capabilities and
coordination of the many groups and
organizations which would be activated
should a real disaster occur.
If a major catastrophic event did take
place, the area would be declared a federal
disaster by the President of the United
States, and the NDMS would become
involved, providing assistance such as
evacuation of the injured to various
hospitals. There are over 100,000 precom-
mitted beds available at any one given time
in the US.
From the United States Air Force
Reserve Base in Minneapolis, Minnesota,
Mr Ed Lord, NDMS area director, coor-
dinated the largest emergency exercise
attempted in US history. In cooperation
with Chicago and Indianapolis, "patients"
were flown in two Hercules C -130s from
Minneapolis to Chicago, two C -130s flew
to Indianapolis with patients and "next of
kin," and two additional planes with
patients were flown from Chicago to
Minneapolis—a total of six planes involved
in the drill.
When the patients arrived in Minneapolis,
they were prioritized by degree of injury
(triage) and sent by ambulance or medical
helicopter to assigned hospitals where they
were "treated" by medical personnel.
Chicago and Indianapolis followed similar
procedures.
A large network of Amateur Radio
operators provided communications, link-
ing the Minneapolis/St Paul area, Chicago,
Indianapolis, Philadelphia, Des Moines,
Sacramento, San Francisco and a dozen
cities in Minnesota. Several modes of
communication were utilized, including
phone, AMTOR, packet radio and amateur
TV. In the Twin Cities alone, there were
100 operators. One hundred -two were
scheduled, with 100 actually participating
—an astounding percentage that proved the
dedication of the amateurs. All ages and
walks of life were represented in the exer-
cise, including an eleven -year-old General
class operator, many senior citizens and
several disabled persons, including a blind
person and one control operator with
cerebral palsy.
Amateurs assisted the American Red
Cross with their disaster welfare inquiries
and provided packet communications from
the communications van at the air base in
Minneapolis to the Red Cross in St Paul.
AMTOR was utilized to relay data between
Indianapolis, St Cloud, and St Paul.
Fast -scan television was used throughout
the hangar with monitors in the communi-
cations command post, command center
command post and the state capitol EOC.
Transmission and reception at the air base
was excellent and exceeded our expecta-
tions. Video reception at the state capitol
was very good. ATV will definitely be a
part of future drills. Previously, there
wasn't a way for the NDMS director, the
communications coordinator and others to
observe the activities while in the command
center. With Amateur Radio communica-
tions in the director's command center,
requests could be made to the ATV control
center to switch to cameras in various
areas, allowing those in the van to be kept
up-to-date on the activities.
The teamwork among the hams was ex-
cellent; they were well-prepared and effi-
cient. There were problem areas, certainly;
delays and mix-ups are a part of life, but
resolving them proved to us that we could
improvise and rectify situations in order to
get things running smoothly.
On the humorous side, there was a Little
comic relief in the morgue area of the
hangar when a "dead" patient opened his
eyes and said to the nearby ham operator,
"Find me a clergyman for my last rites."
So the ham looked at the corpse's dog tags
and asked, "What kind of a Protestant are
you?" "Methodist," said the dead man.
The ham then agreed to find a chaplain,
at which time the dead man asked, "Could
you have him bring me a turkey sandwich
while he's at it? I haven't eaten since before
dawn." This particular person "died"
twice due to an error in the patient -tracking
area. We couldn't help but wonder if it was
the turkey sandwich that did him in the
second time.
A few individuals felt that there should
John Post, KE7AX (r), takes patient information in the medical
transportation area at the USAF reserve base in Minneapolis.
(photos KBBDQB)
68 OS&
ATV cameraman Mike Bingham, WDOFUV, focuses on a
ambulance crew transporting a patient. Fast -scan television al -
towed the NDMS director and the communications coordinator to
observe the activities while in the command center.
)
f
not be emergency drills like the one de-
scribed here. Their reason being, in real
life, we would not have time to prepare. My
answer is, "Where would we be without
preparedness?" It's true, we could be taken
by surprise with an unexpected disaster, but
the more we prepare and coordinate the
efforts between various organizations and
agencies, the more efficient we will be in
handling the problems that would arise in
a serious situation. It is unthinkable to
refuse to prepare. Complacency is a
dangerous thing; we must plan ahead.
I'm sure that the next time we are asked
to provide communications, we will do it
willingly and enthusiastically. Even as you
read this article, the next NDMS exercise
is being planned. It's a large-scale effort,
with at least 15 states planning to partici-
pate. The target date is October, 1990. A
lot of preparation will be going into this
next drill, and many networks of ham
operators will be needed. Perhaps you will
beinvolved.
After the drill, Exercise Assistance Of-
ficer, Division of Emergency Management
for the state of Minnesota, Bob Dahm,
said, "Amateur Radio plays a more impor-
tant role in emergency communications
than most people realize. Amateur Radio
can take over when other means of com-
munications are lost and its reliability and
ability to communicate important informa-
tion should be given more attention in the
future."
Disaster. It's not a matter of if, it's when
it will happen. Are you prepared? Are you
willing? Think about it.
f
not be emergency drills like the one de-
scribed here. Their reason being, in real
life, we would not have time to prepare. My
answer is, "Where would we be without
preparedness?" It's true, we could be taken
by surprise with an unexpected disaster, but
the more we prepare and coordinate the
efforts between various organizations and
agencies, the more efficient we will be in
handling the problems that would arise in
a serious situation. It is unthinkable to
refuse to prepare. Complacency is a
dangerous thing; we must plan ahead.
I'm sure that the next time we are asked
to provide communications, we will do it
willingly and enthusiastically. Even as you
read this article, the next NDMS exercise
is being planned. It's a large-scale effort,
with at least 15 states planning to partici-
pate. The target date is October, 1990. A
lot of preparation will be going into this
next drill, and many networks of ham
operators will be needed. Perhaps you will
beinvolved.
After the drill, Exercise Assistance Of-
ficer, Division of Emergency Management
for the state of Minnesota, Bob Dahm,
said, "Amateur Radio plays a more impor-
tant role in emergency communications
than most people realize. Amateur Radio
can take over when other means of com-
munications are lost and its reliability and
ability to communicate important informa-
tion should be given more attention in the
future."
Disaster. It's not a matter of if, it's when
it will happen. Are you prepared? Are you
willing? Think about it.
orld Ranger
V1ULTIBAND HF YAGIS 10, 15, 20, 40 METERS
Cushcraft Tribanders Make More DX Fun!
Our Three and four element tribanders provide the versatility and performance That you need for
reliable communication around the world. And they last! Cushcraft's World Rangers are made with
6063-T832 aluminum tubing, weatherproof traps, and fiberglass insulators to stand up to the weather.
Our World Rangers have 50 Ohm twin terminal connectors and need no balun. They are designed
with fewer pans foreasierassembly, lower weight and fess wind load. You will spend your time in the
shack, not on the tower!
Ham radio is a lot more fun when you have a dependable antenna like our World Ranger. Make your
choice from our A4S , A3S and A3WS models. Add a 30 or 40 meter kit to make your antenna even
more versatile!
SWR
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
A4S
•4.
'++4
40
«�4
j�•
'9'•
1
aro.
..11wi1.....0-
++i
.��
cw
qE :
R P.10NE
C141 CENTER
PONE
14.1 14.2 14.3
Frequency MHz
14.4
A4S RADIATION PATTERN
SWR
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
2
A3S
14.1 14.2 14.3
Frequency MHz
14.4
t
A3S RADIATION PATTERN
A4S FOUR ELEMENT BEAM
With stainless steel hardware.
The A4S is the true, high performance tribander. Precisely
tuned high-power traps, carefully selected element Lengths, and
proper spacing combine to make the A4S the preferred antenna
for your contest work!
This is the premium antenna with all the features that you want.
High gain, low SWR, and wide bandwidth keep the contacts
coming in. All U -bolts, clamps and hardware are stainless steel.
The A4S has pinned boom sections and formed aluminum
brackets to keep elements straight under all conditions. And our
solid construction keeps the A4S on the tower!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Gain, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, ft (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m1)
Weight, Ib (kg)
A4S
28, 21,14
4
8.9
25
>500
2000
58
18 (5.48)
2 (5.10)
32 (9.75)
1.25 (3.18)
18.4 (5.49)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
5.50 (0.51)
37 (16.8)
A3S THREE ELEMENT BEA
With -stainless steel hardware.
The A3 World Ranger, our top selling tribander, has become the
A3S with all stainless steel hardware. It's a real power -house in
a small space and lets you work the pile-ups with confidence.
All you need is a lightweight tower and rotator to enjoy the
benefits of the A3S. its a proven performer in OX-peditions and
contests and handles full power from your linear. Construction
features include pinned boom sections, heavy duty element
clamps with backing plates plus all stainless steel hardware.
When space is at a premium, but you want the benefits of a full-
size tribander, the A3S is right for you!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Galn, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, fl (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m')
Weight, Ib (kg)
A3S
28, 21, 14
3
8
25
>500
2000
60
14 (4.27)
1.50 (3.81)
27.75 (8.45)
1.25 (3.18)
15.50 (4.72)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
4.36 (0.47)
27 (12.9)
j�•
'9'•
..11wi1.....0-
cw
qE :
R P.10NE
14.1 14.2 14.3
Frequency MHz
14.4
t
A3S RADIATION PATTERN
A4S FOUR ELEMENT BEAM
With stainless steel hardware.
The A4S is the true, high performance tribander. Precisely
tuned high-power traps, carefully selected element Lengths, and
proper spacing combine to make the A4S the preferred antenna
for your contest work!
This is the premium antenna with all the features that you want.
High gain, low SWR, and wide bandwidth keep the contacts
coming in. All U -bolts, clamps and hardware are stainless steel.
The A4S has pinned boom sections and formed aluminum
brackets to keep elements straight under all conditions. And our
solid construction keeps the A4S on the tower!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Gain, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, ft (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m1)
Weight, Ib (kg)
A4S
28, 21,14
4
8.9
25
>500
2000
58
18 (5.48)
2 (5.10)
32 (9.75)
1.25 (3.18)
18.4 (5.49)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
5.50 (0.51)
37 (16.8)
A3S THREE ELEMENT BEA
With -stainless steel hardware.
The A3 World Ranger, our top selling tribander, has become the
A3S with all stainless steel hardware. It's a real power -house in
a small space and lets you work the pile-ups with confidence.
All you need is a lightweight tower and rotator to enjoy the
benefits of the A3S. its a proven performer in OX-peditions and
contests and handles full power from your linear. Construction
features include pinned boom sections, heavy duty element
clamps with backing plates plus all stainless steel hardware.
When space is at a premium, but you want the benefits of a full-
size tribander, the A3S is right for you!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Galn, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, fl (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m')
Weight, Ib (kg)
A3S
28, 21, 14
3
8
25
>500
2000
60
14 (4.27)
1.50 (3.81)
27.75 (8.45)
1.25 (3.18)
15.50 (4.72)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
4.36 (0.47)
27 (12.9)
orld Ranger
V1ULTIBAND HF YAGIS 10, 15, 20, 40 METERS
Cushcraft Tribanders Make More DX Fun!
Our Three and four element tribanders provide the versatility and performance That you need for
reliable communication around the world. And they last! Cushcraft's World Rangers are made with
6063-T832 aluminum tubing, weatherproof traps, and fiberglass insulators to stand up to the weather.
Our World Rangers have 50 Ohm twin terminal connectors and need no balun. They are designed
with fewer pans foreasierassembly, lower weight and fess wind load. You will spend your time in the
shack, not on the tower!
Ham radio is a lot more fun when you have a dependable antenna like our World Ranger. Make your
choice from our A4S , A3S and A3WS models. Add a 30 or 40 meter kit to make your antenna even
more versatile!
SWR
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
A4S
•4.
'++4
40
«�4
j�•
'9'•
1
aro.
..11wi1.....0-
++i
.��
cw
qE :
R P.10NE
C141 CENTER
PONE
14.1 14.2 14.3
Frequency MHz
14.4
A4S RADIATION PATTERN
SWR
2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
2
A3S
14.1 14.2 14.3
Frequency MHz
14.4
t
A3S RADIATION PATTERN
A4S FOUR ELEMENT BEAM
With stainless steel hardware.
The A4S is the true, high performance tribander. Precisely
tuned high-power traps, carefully selected element Lengths, and
proper spacing combine to make the A4S the preferred antenna
for your contest work!
This is the premium antenna with all the features that you want.
High gain, low SWR, and wide bandwidth keep the contacts
coming in. All U -bolts, clamps and hardware are stainless steel.
The A4S has pinned boom sections and formed aluminum
brackets to keep elements straight under all conditions. And our
solid construction keeps the A4S on the tower!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Gain, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, ft (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m1)
Weight, Ib (kg)
A4S
28, 21,14
4
8.9
25
>500
2000
58
18 (5.48)
2 (5.10)
32 (9.75)
1.25 (3.18)
18.4 (5.49)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
5.50 (0.51)
37 (16.8)
A3S THREE ELEMENT BEA
With -stainless steel hardware.
The A3 World Ranger, our top selling tribander, has become the
A3S with all stainless steel hardware. It's a real power -house in
a small space and lets you work the pile-ups with confidence.
All you need is a lightweight tower and rotator to enjoy the
benefits of the A3S. its a proven performer in OX-peditions and
contests and handles full power from your linear. Construction
features include pinned boom sections, heavy duty element
clamps with backing plates plus all stainless steel hardware.
When space is at a premium, but you want the benefits of a full-
size tribander, the A3S is right for you!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Galn, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, fl (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m')
Weight, Ib (kg)
A3S
28, 21, 14
3
8
25
>500
2000
60
14 (4.27)
1.50 (3.81)
27.75 (8.45)
1.25 (3.18)
15.50 (4.72)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
4.36 (0.47)
27 (12.9)
j�•
'9'•
..11wi1.....0-
cw
qE :
R P.10NE
14.1 14.2 14.3
Frequency MHz
14.4
t
A3S RADIATION PATTERN
A4S FOUR ELEMENT BEAM
With stainless steel hardware.
The A4S is the true, high performance tribander. Precisely
tuned high-power traps, carefully selected element Lengths, and
proper spacing combine to make the A4S the preferred antenna
for your contest work!
This is the premium antenna with all the features that you want.
High gain, low SWR, and wide bandwidth keep the contacts
coming in. All U -bolts, clamps and hardware are stainless steel.
The A4S has pinned boom sections and formed aluminum
brackets to keep elements straight under all conditions. And our
solid construction keeps the A4S on the tower!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Gain, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, ft (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m1)
Weight, Ib (kg)
A4S
28, 21,14
4
8.9
25
>500
2000
58
18 (5.48)
2 (5.10)
32 (9.75)
1.25 (3.18)
18.4 (5.49)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
5.50 (0.51)
37 (16.8)
A3S THREE ELEMENT BEA
With -stainless steel hardware.
The A3 World Ranger, our top selling tribander, has become the
A3S with all stainless steel hardware. It's a real power -house in
a small space and lets you work the pile-ups with confidence.
All you need is a lightweight tower and rotator to enjoy the
benefits of the A3S. its a proven performer in OX-peditions and
contests and handles full power from your linear. Construction
features include pinned boom sections, heavy duty element
clamps with backing plates plus all stainless steel hardware.
When space is at a premium, but you want the benefits of a full-
size tribander, the A3S is right for you!
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Galn, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, fl (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m')
Weight, Ib (kg)
A3S
28, 21, 14
3
8
25
>500
2000
60
14 (4.27)
1.50 (3.81)
27.75 (8.45)
1.25 (3.18)
15.50 (4.72)
1.25-2.00 (3.18.5.08)
4.36 (0.47)
27 (12.9)
World Ranger
MULTIBAND HF YAGIS 12, 17, 30 METERS, ROTATABLE DIPOLES
r"A3WS-WARC-BANDS ,
-3-ELEMENT BEAM----`
Enjoy the excitement of our newest HF bands with this all new
beam. The A3WS gives full performance on 12 and 17 meters.
With the addition of our easy to use A103 add on kit, it will also
cover 30 meters.
A3WS needs only a lightweight tower and rotator or you can
mount it above an existing tribander. Construction features
include pinned boom sections, heavy duty element clamps with
backing plates plus all stainless steel hardware. Take charge
of the 12, 17 and 30 meter bands with the new A3WS.
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Gain, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, ft (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m')
Weight, lb (kg)
A3WS
24,18
3
8.0
25
300
2000
60
14 (4.27)
1.5 (3.81)
25.1 (7.66)
1.25 (3.18)
14.4 (4.4)
1.25-2.0 (3.18-5.08)
4.1 (.38)
22.5 (10.2)
30 and 40 METER ADD-ON KITS
40 meters will come alive by adding one of these kits to the
dipole of your A3S or A4S. The kits include high power traps
with heavy wall fiberglass insulator and all hardware. A simple
adjustment allows 30 meter operation. For our newest beam,
the A3WS, we have a 30 meter add on kit the A103.
A743 7 MHz/10 MHz kit for A3
A744 7 MHz/10 MHz kit for A4S
A103 10 MHz kit for A3WS
A103 10 MHz(30m)
A743, A744 7 MHz (40 m) 10 MHz (30 m)
Driven Element with
Adapter kit, ft (m) 33.19 min. 27.12 min. 32.1
35.33 max. 28.4 max.
(10.12-10.77) (8.27-8.66) (9.8)
Windioading ft' (m') .58 (.05) .27 (.03) .45 (.04)
Bandwidth, KHz 125 150 250
Power Rating, Watts 2000 PEP 2000 PEP 2000 PEP
Side Rejection, dB 20 20 20
Weight, Ib (kg) 3.44 (1.56) 2.29 (1.04) 3.25 (1.47)
ROTATABLE DIPOLES
Our World Ranger Dipoles give bi-directional patterns and
rotatable convenience. You can mount them high and away
from the trees for better performance than a wire dipole. These
single and multi -band dipoles feature high-performance traps,
heavy wall tubing, and rugged hardware for years of enjoyment.
D3W WORLD RANGER DIPOLE
The perfect answer for the WARC bands. This rotatable dipole
is easily mounted on the same mast as your existing tri -bander
or other antennas. With a bi-directional pattem it will give you
amazing performance on the new bands.
SWR
20
1.8
16
14
1.2
SWR
20
18
16
14
1.2
A3WS -12 Meters
24 5 25 25.5 26
Frequency MHz
A3WS 17 Meters
v11110®Vi®NIMs
I•i®III------
18 18.1 18 2 18.3
Frequency MH
MODEL 040
Frequency, MHz 7
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
D4 D3 D3W
28,21,14,7 28, 21,14 24,18,10
2:1 Bandwidth, KHz 200 >350 >500 >200
40>125
Power Rating
Watts PEP 2000
Length ft 42.25
(m) (12.88)
Mast Dia. Max., in(cm) 2 (5)
Wind Load, ft' (m2) 1.3 (.12)
Weight, lb (kg) 12 (5)
2000 2000 2000
35.8 25.8 34.0
(10.92) (7.86) (10.37)
2 (5) 2 (5) 2 (5)
1.3 (.12) .9 (.08) .9 (.08)
13 (6) 9 (4) 11 (5)
pwriWN
4,v
117.14,14
0.111i4*
.F.M1M4.4
TYPICAL DIPOLE
RADIATION PATTERN
3
World Ranger
MULTIBAND HF YAGIS 12, 17, 30 METERS, ROTATABLE DIPOLES
r"A3WS-WARC-BANDS ,
-3-ELEMENT BEAM----`
Enjoy the excitement of our newest HF bands with this all new
beam. The A3WS gives full performance on 12 and 17 meters.
With the addition of our easy to use A103 add on kit, it will also
cover 30 meters.
A3WS needs only a lightweight tower and rotator or you can
mount it above an existing tribander. Construction features
include pinned boom sections, heavy duty element clamps with
backing plates plus all stainless steel hardware. Take charge
of the 12, 17 and 30 meter bands with the new A3WS.
MODEL
Frequency, MHz
No. Elements
Forward Gain, dBd
Front to Back Ratio, dB
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
2:1 Bandwidth KHz
Power Rating, Watts PEP
3 dB Beam Width, Deg. E Plane
Boom Length, ft (m)
Boom Diameter, In (cm)
Longest Element, ft (m)
Element Center Dia, in (cm)
Turning Radius, ft (m)
Mast Size Range, in (cm)
Wind Load, ft' (m')
Weight, lb (kg)
A3WS
24,18
3
8.0
25
300
2000
60
14 (4.27)
1.5 (3.81)
25.1 (7.66)
1.25 (3.18)
14.4 (4.4)
1.25-2.0 (3.18-5.08)
4.1 (.38)
22.5 (10.2)
30 and 40 METER ADD-ON KITS
40 meters will come alive by adding one of these kits to the
dipole of your A3S or A4S. The kits include high power traps
with heavy wall fiberglass insulator and all hardware. A simple
adjustment allows 30 meter operation. For our newest beam,
the A3WS, we have a 30 meter add on kit the A103.
A743 7 MHz/10 MHz kit for A3
A744 7 MHz/10 MHz kit for A4S
A103 10 MHz kit for A3WS
A103 10 MHz(30m)
A743, A744 7 MHz (40 m) 10 MHz (30 m)
Driven Element with
Adapter kit, ft (m) 33.19 min. 27.12 min. 32.1
35.33 max. 28.4 max.
(10.12-10.77) (8.27-8.66) (9.8)
Windioading ft' (m') .58 (.05) .27 (.03) .45 (.04)
Bandwidth, KHz 125 150 250
Power Rating, Watts 2000 PEP 2000 PEP 2000 PEP
Side Rejection, dB 20 20 20
Weight, Ib (kg) 3.44 (1.56) 2.29 (1.04) 3.25 (1.47)
ROTATABLE DIPOLES
Our World Ranger Dipoles give bi-directional patterns and
rotatable convenience. You can mount them high and away
from the trees for better performance than a wire dipole. These
single and multi -band dipoles feature high-performance traps,
heavy wall tubing, and rugged hardware for years of enjoyment.
D3W WORLD RANGER DIPOLE
The perfect answer for the WARC bands. This rotatable dipole
is easily mounted on the same mast as your existing tri -bander
or other antennas. With a bi-directional pattem it will give you
amazing performance on the new bands.
SWR
20
1.8
16
14
1.2
SWR
20
18
16
14
1.2
A3WS -12 Meters
24 5 25 25.5 26
Frequency MHz
A3WS 17 Meters
v11110®Vi®NIMs
I•i®III------
18 18.1 18 2 18.3
Frequency MH
MODEL 040
Frequency, MHz 7
SWR 1.2:1 Typical
D4 D3 D3W
28,21,14,7 28, 21,14 24,18,10
2:1 Bandwidth, KHz 200 >350 >500 >200
40>125
Power Rating
Watts PEP 2000
Length ft 42.25
(m) (12.88)
Mast Dia. Max., in(cm) 2 (5)
Wind Load, ft' (m2) 1.3 (.12)
Weight, lb (kg) 12 (5)
2000 2000 2000
35.8 25.8 34.0
(10.92) (7.86) (10.37)
2 (5) 2 (5) 2 (5)
1.3 (.12) .9 (.08) .9 (.08)
13 (6) 9 (4) 11 (5)
pwriWN
4,v
117.14,14
0.111i4*
.F.M1M4.4
TYPICAL DIPOLE
RADIATION PATTERN
3
Antenna
Owers
4 SECTION
2 SECTIONS
HG -37S5
Recommended
Rotator:
HAM IV
HG-52SS
Recommended Rotators
HAM IV HDR 300
HG-54H0
Recommended Rotators*
HAM IV•. T.7X_HDR 300
HG-70HD
Recommended Rotators:
HAM IV. PX. HDR 300
Tower Foundation
.Steel Cage
Foundation
(supplied wllh tower)
6"
Concrete •
Concrete Base Dimensions
Include 6" of concrete above ground.
HG,70H0
I 14a y0+.
134c m)
canary! ,
1
MG•525S
146,51H0
6-=�_ 1( T
1
13 cu. yds. I m
II (2,3 cu, m.) � 1
h.
I cement I t
t1 /'i
k�7' tr07ml
1107m1�
HG 37SE
_
e=F___ .'fI ti
'lieu
w".n, .0/ i —1—
31-1%,,,I >o
-..' 76 m1
19
Antenna
Owers
4 SECTION
2 SECTIONS
HG -37S5
Recommended
Rotator:
HAM IV
HG-52SS
Recommended Rotators
HAM IV HDR 300
HG-54H0
Recommended Rotators*
HAM IV•. T.7X_HDR 300
HG-70HD
Recommended Rotators:
HAM IV. PX. HDR 300
Tower Foundation
.Steel Cage
Foundation
(supplied wllh tower)
6"
Concrete •
Concrete Base Dimensions
Include 6" of concrete above ground.
HG,70H0
I 14a y0+.
134c m)
canary! ,
1
MG•525S
146,51H0
6-=�_ 1( T
1
13 cu. yds. I m
II (2,3 cu, m.) � 1
h.
I cement I t
t1 /'i
k�7' tr07ml
1107m1�
HG 37SE
_
e=F___ .'fI ti
'lieu
w".n, .0/ i —1—
31-1%,,,I >o
-..' 76 m1
19
Antenna
lowers
ORDER
NO.
MODEL
NO.
ASTM
STANDARDS
ft.
m.
ft.
m.
in.
mm.
/
sq. ft.
m2
lbs.
kg.
125-1
HG-52SS
3
A50 -A36
and A570
and A570
52
15.8
21
6.4
16.44
417.6
9.5
.8
455
206
129
HG-37SS
2
A500 -A3637
and A570570 '
11.3
20.5
6.2
13.75
349.3
9.5
.8
265
120
130-1
HG-54HD3
A500 -A36
54
16.5
21.5
6.6
19.53_
496.1
16*
1.5*
575
261
131-1
HG-70HD
4
A500 -A36
and A570
70
21.3
21.5
6.6
22.63
574.7
16'
1.5'
1100
499
'These towers windload rated at 60 mph (96.6 km./hr.)
Self -Supporting Crank -Up Towers
Hy -Gain's rugged self-supporting
crank -up towers are made of steel
and are galvanized after welding to
ASTM material standards. Open end
tubular steel legs are galvanized •
inside and out and permit
unrestricted moisture drainage. Giant
welding fixtures assure straight and
true alignment of the tower sections
for close tolerance crank -up guide
systems. These towers can be
extended with a manual winch
(included) or with an electric winch. A
highly recommended option is the
thrust bearing, which can be bolted
to the tower's top section to accept
masts of up to 23/,6" (55 mm)
diameter. All Hy -Gain towers are
complete with base hinge, foundation
steel -cage and a pre -drilled rotator
mounting plate. These towers require
no guying and conform to EIA
specifications and the Uniform
Building Code. They are also
approved by the city of Los Angeles
under Los Angeles fabrications
license no. 1095. UBC documents for
building permits are available on
request (specify tower model) before
purchasing a tower.
Diamond -Web Bracing means
more strength where it's needed most
The "diamond web" or "double w "
lattice brace configuration is used in
Hy:Gain towers for added strength
where the sections overlap. The
diamond web design has 2'/2 times
the strength of the common "W"
brace. When the tower is in its fully
extended position, the wind Toad
capacity is between 50 and 60 miles
per hour (at its full rated load)
depending on model.
18
.`... • '•••••••
t-..,...•• - - `L.
• - ► .-41:‘ �/Ir /,1/
./, f, a '. _
\
i .:'''1/i
'�'' / A O' frA.---
Antenna
lowers
ORDER
NO.
MODEL
NO.
ASTM
STANDARDS
ft.
m.
ft.
m.
in.
mm.
/
sq. ft.
m2
lbs.
kg.
125-1
HG-52SS
3
A50 -A36
and A570
and A570
52
15.8
21
6.4
16.44
417.6
9.5
.8
455
206
129
HG-37SS
2
A500 -A3637
and A570570 '
11.3
20.5
6.2
13.75
349.3
9.5
.8
265
120
130-1
HG-54HD3
A500 -A36
54
16.5
21.5
6.6
19.53_
496.1
16*
1.5*
575
261
131-1
HG-70HD
4
A500 -A36
and A570
70
21.3
21.5
6.6
22.63
574.7
16'
1.5'
1100
499
'These towers windload rated at 60 mph (96.6 km./hr.)
Self -Supporting Crank -Up Towers
Hy -Gain's rugged self-supporting
crank -up towers are made of steel
and are galvanized after welding to
ASTM material standards. Open end
tubular steel legs are galvanized •
inside and out and permit
unrestricted moisture drainage. Giant
welding fixtures assure straight and
true alignment of the tower sections
for close tolerance crank -up guide
systems. These towers can be
extended with a manual winch
(included) or with an electric winch. A
highly recommended option is the
thrust bearing, which can be bolted
to the tower's top section to accept
masts of up to 23/,6" (55 mm)
diameter. All Hy -Gain towers are
complete with base hinge, foundation
steel -cage and a pre -drilled rotator
mounting plate. These towers require
no guying and conform to EIA
specifications and the Uniform
Building Code. They are also
approved by the city of Los Angeles
under Los Angeles fabrications
license no. 1095. UBC documents for
building permits are available on
request (specify tower model) before
purchasing a tower.
Diamond -Web Bracing means
more strength where it's needed most
The "diamond web" or "double w "
lattice brace configuration is used in
Hy:Gain towers for added strength
where the sections overlap. The
diamond web design has 2'/2 times
the strength of the common "W"
brace. When the tower is in its fully
extended position, the wind Toad
capacity is between 50 and 60 miles
per hour (at its full rated load)
depending on model.
18
.`... • '•••••••
t-..,...•• - - `L.
• - ► .-41:‘ �/Ir /,1/
./, f, a '. _
\
i .:'''1/i
'�'' / A O' frA.---
THE FOLLOWING TAXPAYERS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STRONGLY OPPOSE
THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED RADIO TOWER IN THEIR
NEIGHBORHOOD.
NAME
ADDRESS DATE
��� /�7GCit i 166
71
3 \711471.7/C,
4 _. ' 4444-C
AA -/i11
5
6 )/tA
7
8
94.7/0/
54 t) 1,t�14,z
5,4 4(7° 0V-3 -
1.
7/
427/to /4- 79,-t. -5/
.rte f . (1).„w
afy4- _
10
11 a�-�
12 01-��
13
14
15
16
17
Pfr/i
/ 4,/ 9.
f//2
s(,2 f9.4; a/'t/4
Se. 3 A/l4Lt/C47 a// /
.5-43 `Ake.vtz 4a' .7-4/-9/
£70 `%
18 I (���i .� — 53-2 /1.l kA - Z-
20
/f
19
t9./
Gc/CLGI�G v /`
THE FOLLOWING TAXPAYERS OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STRONGLY OPPOSE
THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED RADIO TOWER IN THEIR
NEIGHBORHOOD.
NAME
ADDRESS DATE
��� /�7GCit i 166
71
3 \711471.7/C,
4 _. ' 4444-C
AA -/i11
5
6 )/tA
7
8
94.7/0/
54 t) 1,t�14,z
5,4 4(7° 0V-3 -
1.
7/
427/to /4- 79,-t. -5/
.rte f . (1).„w
afy4- _
10
11 a�-�
12 01-��
13
14
15
16
17
Pfr/i
/ 4,/ 9.
f//2
s(,2 f9.4; a/'t/4
Se. 3 A/l4Lt/C47 a// /
.5-43 `Ake.vtz 4a' .7-4/-9/
£70 `%
18 I (���i .� — 53-2 /1.l kA - Z-
20
/f
19
t9./
Gc/CLGI�G v /`
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 16, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Richard Gill
Code Enforcement Officer/Weed Inspector
SUBJECT: Enforcement Policy Regarding Zoning Ordinance #1001:
The Weed Ordinance
INTRODUCTION:
Council has raised a question about the timeline of Weed
Ordinance violation enforcement. It seems to take so long before
weeds are cut after a complaint has been received.
DISCUSSION:
The present enforcement policy has been in effect for
several years and may need some modification. It is as follows:
(copies of the form letters and Ordinance are attached). I write
the initial letter requesting the weeds be cut after the weeds
reach more than 12" in height. Researching ownership, typing
letters and mail delivery can take 3 days. Typically I reinspect
after 10 days. (This is the approximate length of time that is
allowed for compliance with most Zoning Ordinances.) If the
weeds are not cut I send a certified letter informing the
property owner that if the weeds are not cut within 5 days the
City will hire the work done and they will be billed. Certified
mail is delivered back to the Post Office if no one is home and
they have 7 days to pick it up before it is returned to me. If
no response is realized, I will call a contractor to have the
property mowed. Depending on his work load it is often 7 days
before he can perform the work. As you can see this can be a
lengthy process - up to 30 days.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 16, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Richard Gill
Code Enforcement Officer/Weed Inspector
SUBJECT: Enforcement Policy Regarding Zoning Ordinance #1001:
The Weed Ordinance
INTRODUCTION:
Council has raised a question about the timeline of Weed
Ordinance violation enforcement. It seems to take so long before
weeds are cut after a complaint has been received.
DISCUSSION:
The present enforcement policy has been in effect for
several years and may need some modification. It is as follows:
(copies of the form letters and Ordinance are attached). I write
the initial letter requesting the weeds be cut after the weeds
reach more than 12" in height. Researching ownership, typing
letters and mail delivery can take 3 days. Typically I reinspect
after 10 days. (This is the approximate length of time that is
allowed for compliance with most Zoning Ordinances.) If the
weeds are not cut I send a certified letter informing the
property owner that if the weeds are not cut within 5 days the
City will hire the work done and they will be billed. Certified
mail is delivered back to the Post Office if no one is home and
they have 7 days to pick it up before it is returned to me. If
no response is realized, I will call a contractor to have the
property mowed. Depending on his work load it is often 7 days
before he can perform the work. As you can see this can be a
lengthy process - up to 30 days.
OPTIONS:
Council may wish to decide on some alternatives. Time could
be saved in a couple of ways.
1. The Ordinance itself does not require two letters to be
written. It simply states " . . . the Weed Inspector shall
serve written notice . . .". If the initial letter was the
certified one, several days could be saved. Many of the
violators of the Weed Ordinance are repeat offenders and are
therefore aware of the requirements from previous years.
The drawback, however, is that the first letter of request
is a courtesy to those unknowing individuals, many of whom
respond before the second letter is written.
2. Perhaps if the initial letter is continued, a shorter
period of time should elapse before compliance is expected.
Maybe a 5 day period would not be expecting too much.
The drawbacks on this issue are that if the owner
intends to do the cutting himself he usually will choose a
weekend to do it. If he hires someone for the job, there is
often a several day wait before the contractor can get it
done.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to speed up the execution of the Weed
Ordinance it should review the options and give staff directions
on any new weed policy to be implemented.
OPTIONS:
Council may wish to decide on some alternatives. Time could
be saved in a couple of ways.
1. The Ordinance itself does not require two letters to be
written. It simply states " . . . the Weed Inspector shall
serve written notice . . .". If the initial letter was the
certified one, several days could be saved. Many of the
violators of the Weed Ordinance are repeat offenders and are
therefore aware of the requirements from previous years.
The drawback, however, is that the first letter of request
is a courtesy to those unknowing individuals, many of whom
respond before the second letter is written.
2. Perhaps if the initial letter is continued, a shorter
period of time should elapse before compliance is expected.
Maybe a 5 day period would not be expecting too much.
The drawbacks on this issue are that if the owner
intends to do the cutting himself he usually will choose a
weekend to do it. If he hires someone for the job, there is
often a several day wait before the contractor can get it
done.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council wishes to speed up the execution of the Weed
Ordinance it should review the options and give staff directions
on any new weed policy to be implemented.
Staff has noted that there are weeds growing on your property
of greater height than twelve (12) inches on the average or
they have gone to seed. In accordance with Ordinance No.
1001, it will be necessary to remove these weeds and keep
them under control throughout the summer months.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
CL;t7
(2f4A7
Richard A. Gill
Code Enforcement Officer
RAG:nb
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452-1850
Staff has noted that there are weeds growing on your property
of greater height than twelve (12) inches on the average or
they have gone to seed. In accordance with Ordinance No.
1001, it will be necessary to remove these weeds and keep
them under control throughout the summer months.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
CL;t7
(2f4A7
Richard A. Gill
Code Enforcement Officer
RAG:nb
1101 Victoria Curve -Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452-1850
bear Sirs:
In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001, this letter is to serve as
formal notification that it has been longer than 10 days since you were
notified t� cut weeds or your property. This same Ordinance gives the
Zoning Code Enforcement Officer the authority to order weeds cut and/or
removed within five (5) days of the receipt of this notice. If this
work is not done by the owner, the City will have the work done at the
expense of the owner; and if unpaid for a period of twenty (20) days,
the charges will be made as a special assessment against the property.
'If our records are inconsistent with yours, or you have questions
please feel free to call me at City Hall. Thank you for your cooperation
in this matter.
Sincerely,
t. 7-i
6
Richard A. Gill
Assistant Code Enforcement Officer
RAG:np
750 South Plaza Drive • Mendota ileights, Minnesota 55120 - 4521850
bear Sirs:
In accordance with Ordinance No. 1001, this letter is to serve as
formal notification that it has been longer than 10 days since you were
notified t� cut weeds or your property. This same Ordinance gives the
Zoning Code Enforcement Officer the authority to order weeds cut and/or
removed within five (5) days of the receipt of this notice. If this
work is not done by the owner, the City will have the work done at the
expense of the owner; and if unpaid for a period of twenty (20) days,
the charges will be made as a special assessment against the property.
'If our records are inconsistent with yours, or you have questions
please feel free to call me at City Hall. Thank you for your cooperation
in this matter.
Sincerely,
t. 7-i
6
Richard A. Gill
Assistant Code Enforcement Officer
RAG:np
750 South Plaza Drive • Mendota ileights, Minnesota 55120 - 4521850
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND CONTROLLING THE GROWTH OF WEEDS,
AND OTHER RANK, POISONOUS OR HARMFUL VEGETATION IN THE VILLAGE
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS.
SECTION 1. CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF GRASS, WEEDS, AND OTHER RANK,
POISONOUS OR HARMFUL VEGETATION
It shall be unlawful for any owner, lessee or occupant, or any agent, servant, repre-
sentative or employee of any such owner, lessee or occupant having control of any
occupied or unoccupied lot or land or any part thereof in the Village of Mendota
Heights to permit or maintain on any such lot or land, or on or along the sidewalk,
street or alley adjacent to the same between the property line and the curb or middle
of the alley or for ten feet outside the property line if there is no curb, any growth
of weeds, grass or other rank vegetation to the greater height than twelve (12,) inches
on the average, or any accumulation of dead weeds, grass or brush. It shall also be
unlawful for any such person or persons to cause, suffer or allow poison ivy, ragweed
or other poisonous plant or plants detrimental to health to grow on any such lot or land
in such manner that any part of such ivy, ragweed, or other poisonous or harmful weed
shall extend upon, overhang.or border any public place or allow the seed, pollen or
other poisonous particles or emanations therefrom to be carried through the air into any
public place.
SECTION 2. DUTY OF OWNER, LESSEE OR OCCUPANT
It shall be the duty of any owner, lessee or occupant of any lot or land to cut and
remove or cause to be cut and removed all such weeds, grass or other rank, poisonous
or harmful vegetation as often as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of
Section 1; provided that cutting andremoving such weeds, grass and vegetation at least
once in every three weeks, between May 15 and September 15 shall be deemed to be
a compliance with this ordinance.
SECTION 3. WHEN VILLAGE TO DO WORK
If the provisions of the foregoing sections are not complied with the Weed Inspector
shall serve written notice upon the owner, lessee or occupant or any person having
the care or control of any such lot or land to comply with the provision of this ordinance.
(1001) 1
ORDINANCE NO. 1001
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND CONTROLLING THE GROWTH OF WEEDS,
AND OTHER RANK, POISONOUS OR HARMFUL VEGETATION IN THE VILLAGE
OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS.
SECTION 1. CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF GRASS, WEEDS, AND OTHER RANK,
POISONOUS OR HARMFUL VEGETATION
It shall be unlawful for any owner, lessee or occupant, or any agent, servant, repre-
sentative or employee of any such owner, lessee or occupant having control of any
occupied or unoccupied lot or land or any part thereof in the Village of Mendota
Heights to permit or maintain on any such lot or land, or on or along the sidewalk,
street or alley adjacent to the same between the property line and the curb or middle
of the alley or for ten feet outside the property line if there is no curb, any growth
of weeds, grass or other rank vegetation to the greater height than twelve (12,) inches
on the average, or any accumulation of dead weeds, grass or brush. It shall also be
unlawful for any such person or persons to cause, suffer or allow poison ivy, ragweed
or other poisonous plant or plants detrimental to health to grow on any such lot or land
in such manner that any part of such ivy, ragweed, or other poisonous or harmful weed
shall extend upon, overhang.or border any public place or allow the seed, pollen or
other poisonous particles or emanations therefrom to be carried through the air into any
public place.
SECTION 2. DUTY OF OWNER, LESSEE OR OCCUPANT
It shall be the duty of any owner, lessee or occupant of any lot or land to cut and
remove or cause to be cut and removed all such weeds, grass or other rank, poisonous
or harmful vegetation as often as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of
Section 1; provided that cutting andremoving such weeds, grass and vegetation at least
once in every three weeks, between May 15 and September 15 shall be deemed to be
a compliance with this ordinance.
SECTION 3. WHEN VILLAGE TO DO WORK
If the provisions of the foregoing sections are not complied with the Weed Inspector
shall serve written notice upon the owner, lessee or occupant or any person having
the care or control of any such lot or land to comply with the provision of this ordinance.
(1001) 1
If the person upon whom the notice is served !ails, neglects or refuses to cut
and remove or to cause to be cut and removed such weeds, grass or other vege-
tation within five days after receipt of such notice, or if no person can be
found in the City of Mendota Heights who either is or claims to be the owner
of such lot or land or who either represents or claims to represent such
owner, the Weed Inspector shall cause such weeds, grass and other vegetation
on such lot or land to be cut and removed and the actual cost of such cutting
and removal, plus five percent for inspection and other additional costs in
connection therewith, shall be certified by the City Clerk to the County
Auditor and shall thereupon become and be a lien upon the property on which
such weeds, grass and other vegetation were located and shall be added to and
become and form part of the taxes next to be assessed and levied upon such
lot or land and shall bear interest at the same rate as taxes and shall be
collected and enforced by the same officer and in the same manner as taxes.
SECTION 4. PENALTY
Any person who shall neglect to cut and remove weeds, grass or other vegeta-
tion as directed in this ordinance, or who shall fail, neglect or refuse to
comply with the provisions of any notice herein provided or who shall violate
any of the provisions of this ordinance or who shall resist or obstruct the
Weed Inspector or his employees in the cutting and removal of weeds, grass
and other vegetation, shall, upon conviction thereof, be subject to a fine
of not less than $25.00 or more than$500.00 and each day on which such vio-
lation continues shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 5. DEFINITION
The word "person" as used in this ordinance shall mean and include one or more
persons of either sex, natural persons, corporations, partnerships, associations,
joint stock companies, societies and all other entities of any kind capable of
being sued.
SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
(1001) 2
If the person upon whom the notice is served !ails, neglects or refuses to cut
and remove or to cause to be cut and removed such weeds, grass or other vege-
tation within five days after receipt of such notice, or if no person can be
found in the City of Mendota Heights who either is or claims to be the owner
of such lot or land or who either represents or claims to represent such
owner, the Weed Inspector shall cause such weeds, grass and other vegetation
on such lot or land to be cut and removed and the actual cost of such cutting
and removal, plus five percent for inspection and other additional costs in
connection therewith, shall be certified by the City Clerk to the County
Auditor and shall thereupon become and be a lien upon the property on which
such weeds, grass and other vegetation were located and shall be added to and
become and form part of the taxes next to be assessed and levied upon such
lot or land and shall bear interest at the same rate as taxes and shall be
collected and enforced by the same officer and in the same manner as taxes.
SECTION 4. PENALTY
Any person who shall neglect to cut and remove weeds, grass or other vegeta-
tion as directed in this ordinance, or who shall fail, neglect or refuse to
comply with the provisions of any notice herein provided or who shall violate
any of the provisions of this ordinance or who shall resist or obstruct the
Weed Inspector or his employees in the cutting and removal of weeds, grass
and other vegetation, shall, upon conviction thereof, be subject to a fine
of not less than $25.00 or more than$500.00 and each day on which such vio-
lation continues shall constitute a separate offense.
SECTION 5. DEFINITION
The word "person" as used in this ordinance shall mean and include one or more
persons of either sex, natural persons, corporations, partnerships, associations,
joint stock companies, societies and all other entities of any kind capable of
being sued.
SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions
of this ordinance are hereby repealed.
(1001) 2
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 2, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Richard Gill
Code Enforcement Officer/Weed Inspector
SUBJECT: Report on requests for and exemptions granted from the
Weed Ordinance
INTRODUCTION
During the summer of 1990, a number of people requested that
several green areas be exempted from the Weed Ordinance. Council
authorized me to grant these exemptions on a trial basis and
report back with the results of the test.
GUIDELINES FOR EXEMPTIONS
Zoning Ordinance #1001 referred to as the "Weed Ordinance"
states that noxious weeds, and weeds and grasses in excess of 12"
in height, have to be controlled by being cut. The criteria I
used for granting exemptions from strict compliance with the
Ordinance are as follows;
1. Wetland areas
2. Wooded areas or steep
slopes
3. Large undeveloped property and wildlife
habitat
4. Nature preserves or adjacent properties
5. Unimproved portions of City parks
6. State owned property
7. Rights-of-way or ditches
8. Portions of residential lots designated
natural, planted with decorative plants such
as prairie grass, wild flowers etc.
DISCUSSION
There have been about 20 requests for exemptions from the
Weed Ordinance. Only four complaints have been received about
these properties, and some of those prior to Council's decision
to allow exemptions. Attached are lists of the specific
properties granted exemptions and the complaints received.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 2, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Richard Gill
Code Enforcement Officer/Weed Inspector
SUBJECT: Report on requests for and exemptions granted from the
Weed Ordinance
INTRODUCTION
During the summer of 1990, a number of people requested that
several green areas be exempted from the Weed Ordinance. Council
authorized me to grant these exemptions on a trial basis and
report back with the results of the test.
GUIDELINES FOR EXEMPTIONS
Zoning Ordinance #1001 referred to as the "Weed Ordinance"
states that noxious weeds, and weeds and grasses in excess of 12"
in height, have to be controlled by being cut. The criteria I
used for granting exemptions from strict compliance with the
Ordinance are as follows;
1. Wetland areas
2. Wooded areas or steep
slopes
3. Large undeveloped property and wildlife
habitat
4. Nature preserves or adjacent properties
5. Unimproved portions of City parks
6. State owned property
7. Rights-of-way or ditches
8. Portions of residential lots designated
natural, planted with decorative plants such
as prairie grass, wild flowers etc.
DISCUSSION
There have been about 20 requests for exemptions from the
Weed Ordinance. Only four complaints have been received about
these properties, and some of those prior to Council's decision
to allow exemptions. Attached are lists of the specific
properties granted exemptions and the complaints received.
RECOMMENDATION
With the recent popularity of "green areas", protecting
nature and wildlife, and the desire for rustic beauty, I think
that the requested exemptions from strict compliance to Ordinance
#1001 should continue to be granted. With a five to one response
in favor of this action, I don't anticipate major problems with
complaints. Usually the complaintant wants properties cut
because they know the Ordinance is specific in its 12" height
restriction or they had previously been asked to mow their own
weeds. When I explain that Council has decided to grant
exemptions they are usually sympathetic to the cause and the
reasons given.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council agrees with the need for granting exemptions from
compliance with the Weed Ordinance for particular properties, it
should pass a motion directing me to rewrite the Ordinance
allowing such action and submit it for their final approval.
RECOMMENDATION
With the recent popularity of "green areas", protecting
nature and wildlife, and the desire for rustic beauty, I think
that the requested exemptions from strict compliance to Ordinance
#1001 should continue to be granted. With a five to one response
in favor of this action, I don't anticipate major problems with
complaints. Usually the complaintant wants properties cut
because they know the Ordinance is specific in its 12" height
restriction or they had previously been asked to mow their own
weeds. When I explain that Council has decided to grant
exemptions they are usually sympathetic to the cause and the
reasons given.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council agrees with the need for granting exemptions from
compliance with the Weed Ordinance for particular properties, it
should pass a motion directing me to rewrite the Ordinance
allowing such action and submit it for their final approval.
Properties Where Exemptions Were Requested and Granted
1. Joseph & Joan Nelson -2366 Apache Court: portion of
residential lot with prairie grass & wild flowers
2. Robert & Charlotte Sjoberg -2360 Apache Court: same as above
3. Bruce & Cherie Reichow-2374 Apache Court: same as above
4. John Campbell -2348 Apache Court: property is adjacent to
ones above
5. Cindy Nelson, Margie Johnson (and other Apache Lane
residents) -school district property south of Apache Lane and
north of Mendota Heights Road: undeveloped wildlife habitat
6. Lois Rockney-School District #197: same location and reason
as above
7. Mrs. Bruce Nelson -710 Wentworth: portion of residential lot
requested to remain natural seedings planted
8. Copperfield resident adjacent to Huber Ponds: wild flowers
etc. planted on lot adjacent to park and wetlands
9. Mrs. Yue -1234 Knollwood: residential lot planted with a
"ground cover" type plant
10. Paul Trebil-Centex property south of Mendota Heights Road:
large undeveloped wildlife habitat
11. Dick Putnam -Tandem Corp.; intersection of Dodd Road, 494 &
Mendota Heights Road: same as above
12. Ms. Billie Logan-lst Avenue: same as above
13. Dodge Nature Center: nature preserve
14. Tom Lawell-530 Dodge Lane: residential lot adjacent to
nature preserve
Properties Where Exemptions Were Requested and Granted
1. Joseph & Joan Nelson -2366 Apache Court: portion of
residential lot with prairie grass & wild flowers
2. Robert & Charlotte Sjoberg -2360 Apache Court: same as above
3. Bruce & Cherie Reichow-2374 Apache Court: same as above
4. John Campbell -2348 Apache Court: property is adjacent to
ones above
5. Cindy Nelson, Margie Johnson (and other Apache Lane
residents) -school district property south of Apache Lane and
north of Mendota Heights Road: undeveloped wildlife habitat
6. Lois Rockney-School District #197: same location and reason
as above
7. Mrs. Bruce Nelson -710 Wentworth: portion of residential lot
requested to remain natural seedings planted
8. Copperfield resident adjacent to Huber Ponds: wild flowers
etc. planted on lot adjacent to park and wetlands
9. Mrs. Yue -1234 Knollwood: residential lot planted with a
"ground cover" type plant
10. Paul Trebil-Centex property south of Mendota Heights Road:
large undeveloped wildlife habitat
11. Dick Putnam -Tandem Corp.; intersection of Dodd Road, 494 &
Mendota Heights Road: same as above
12. Ms. Billie Logan-lst Avenue: same as above
13. Dodge Nature Center: nature preserve
14. Tom Lawell-530 Dodge Lane: residential lot adjacent to
nature preserve
15. C.G. Rein, Perkegivin & City-Outlots Mendakota Estates:
undeveloped wildlife habitat
16. Howard from Somerset 19 Homeowners Association -property
south of 4th Avenue: wetlands, wooded
17. Dick Herzog -703 Maple Park Court: wooded portion of
residential lot
18. Tom Fahey -979 Caren Road: City property bounded by Lilac
Lane, Caren Road and James Road
19. Ron Des Lauriers Mn/DOT: state properties and rights of way
on Dodd Road and Highway 110
15. C.G. Rein, Perkegivin & City-Outlots Mendakota Estates:
undeveloped wildlife habitat
16. Howard from Somerset 19 Homeowners Association -property
south of 4th Avenue: wetlands, wooded
17. Dick Herzog -703 Maple Park Court: wooded portion of
residential lot
18. Tom Fahey -979 Caren Road: City property bounded by Lilac
Lane, Caren Road and James Road
19. Ron Des Lauriers Mn/DOT: state properties and rights of way
on Dodd Road and Highway 110
Complaints Received For Allowing Exemptions
1. 2366, 2360, 2374 Apache Lane: back yards not cut (prior to
Council direction)
2. Willow Springs Subdivision and District #197 property by
Sibley School: wooded & wetland area on corner of Dodd and
Marie not mowed, area north of school not mowed (now City
Park)
3. 703 Maple Park Court: residential lot with woods not mowed -
has noxious weeds
4. 710, Wentworth: rear yard left natural -not mowed
Complaints Received For Allowing Exemptions
1. 2366, 2360, 2374 Apache Lane: back yards not cut (prior to
Council direction)
2. Willow Springs Subdivision and District #197 property by
Sibley School: wooded & wetland area on corner of Dodd and
Marie not mowed, area north of school not mowed (now City
Park)
3. 703 Maple Park Court: residential lot with woods not mowed -
has noxious weeds
4. 710, Wentworth: rear yard left natural -not mowed
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 22, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Tax Increment District Property Purchase
HISTORY
In the Summer of 1988, as part of our Tax Increment Plan, we
had an appraisal made of the property on Roger's Road. At that
time, one owner accepted our offer.
At this time, Mr. Gerry Schouveller has indicated that he
would be interested in the City purchase of his property consisting
of his homestead and two vacant lots. Mr. Schouveller has had an
independent appraisal by Metzen Appraisals made of his property
which is compared with our appraisal on the attached exhibit.
DISCUSSION
On a previous purchase for the District from Ms. Tousignant,
the City offered to split the difference between our appraisal and
her's.
The District has the funds on hand to cover the purchase of
Mr. Schouveller's property. If we go ahead with a purchase, we
would have three properties yet to purchase in the Roger's Road
area. This property was included for purchase and redevelopment in
the District due to the non -conforming use (B-1 Zoning) and
location within the airport noise zones.
If an acceptable offer is made to Mr. Schouveller, he would
like to exercise the option to continue to occupy the property for
up to six months.
ACTION
Determine an amount to offer Mr. Schouveller for the
acquisition of his Roger's Road property.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 22, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: Tax Increment District Property Purchase
HISTORY
In the Summer of 1988, as part of our Tax Increment Plan, we
had an appraisal made of the property on Roger's Road. At that
time, one owner accepted our offer.
At this time, Mr. Gerry Schouveller has indicated that he
would be interested in the City purchase of his property consisting
of his homestead and two vacant lots. Mr. Schouveller has had an
independent appraisal by Metzen Appraisals made of his property
which is compared with our appraisal on the attached exhibit.
DISCUSSION
On a previous purchase for the District from Ms. Tousignant,
the City offered to split the difference between our appraisal and
her's.
The District has the funds on hand to cover the purchase of
Mr. Schouveller's property. If we go ahead with a purchase, we
would have three properties yet to purchase in the Roger's Road
area. This property was included for purchase and redevelopment in
the District due to the non -conforming use (B-1 Zoning) and
location within the airport noise zones.
If an acceptable offer is made to Mr. Schouveller, he would
like to exercise the option to continue to occupy the property for
up to six months.
ACTION
Determine an amount to offer Mr. Schouveller for the
acquisition of his Roger's Road property.
APPRAISAL COMPARISONS
CITY METZEN
House & Lot
House $ 52,000 $ 46,000
Lot $ 12,000 $ 20,000
Total $ 64,000 $ 66,000
2 Lots
35948' @ $1.10
37955' @ $3.36
Net Cost
Net Value
TOTAL APPRAISAL
LES:kkb
$ 40,000
$104,000
$127,528
$ 22,000
$105,528
$170,500
i
APPRAISAL COMPARISONS
CITY METZEN
House & Lot
House $ 52,000 $ 46,000
Lot $ 12,000 $ 20,000
Total $ 64,000 $ 66,000
2 Lots
35948' @ $1.10
37955' @ $3.36
Net Cost
Net Value
TOTAL APPRAISAL
LES:kkb
$ 40,000
$104,000
$127,528
$ 22,000
$105,528
$170,500
i
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 22, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: City Hall Payment Application
HISTORY:
Since our building has been substantially complete, we have
withheld from the contractor approximately $18,000 pending
correction of the drainage and water damage problem we have
experienced.
In fall 1990 we had the contractor attempt to correct the
drainage problem at the front of the building by removing
and replacing the backfill material on either side of the
sidewalk. Water seepage in this area had previously caused
significant damage to the Police Department and adjacent
spaces.
The architect has submitted a request for payment of
$11,277.61 to the general contractor for the work that has
been done. After payment we would retain $5,000 to cover
future corrective work.
At this time, staff has three areas of concern that remain
for completion of the contract. A written statement from
the architect was requested as to the resolution of these
concerns; however, none has been received. These include:
Basement Damage: Correction of water damage to
sheetrock and carpet in exercise,
squad and bathroom.
Rear Damage:
Due to elevation, the regrading work
that was done to the back lawn area
seems to have only moved the water and
has not solved the problem.
Front Drainage: The work completed will provide some
relief; however, it will not be tested
until the spring rains. It should be
noted that no soil replacement was
attempted under the sidewalk itself
which could be the source of our
seepage problem.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 22, 1991
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ
FROM: Lawrence E. Shaughnessy, Jr., Treasurer
SUBJECT: City Hall Payment Application
HISTORY:
Since our building has been substantially complete, we have
withheld from the contractor approximately $18,000 pending
correction of the drainage and water damage problem we have
experienced.
In fall 1990 we had the contractor attempt to correct the
drainage problem at the front of the building by removing
and replacing the backfill material on either side of the
sidewalk. Water seepage in this area had previously caused
significant damage to the Police Department and adjacent
spaces.
The architect has submitted a request for payment of
$11,277.61 to the general contractor for the work that has
been done. After payment we would retain $5,000 to cover
future corrective work.
At this time, staff has three areas of concern that remain
for completion of the contract. A written statement from
the architect was requested as to the resolution of these
concerns; however, none has been received. These include:
Basement Damage: Correction of water damage to
sheetrock and carpet in exercise,
squad and bathroom.
Rear Damage:
Due to elevation, the regrading work
that was done to the back lawn area
seems to have only moved the water and
has not solved the problem.
Front Drainage: The work completed will provide some
relief; however, it will not be tested
until the spring rains. It should be
noted that no soil replacement was
attempted under the sidewalk itself
which could be the source of our
seepage problem.
Because of the remaining questions, and lack of response to
future corrections, staff feels the payment request is
excessive and Council should reject payment.
ACTION REQUIRED
Consider response to payment request and determine the
amount, if any, that should be approved.
Because of the remaining questions, and lack of response to
future corrections, staff feels the payment request is
excessive and Council should reject payment.
ACTION REQUIRED
Consider response to payment request and determine the
amount, if any, that should be approved.
)
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT
AIA DOCUMENT G702
PAGE ONE OF PAGES
PROJECT:
(name, address)
TO (Owner)
ATTN:
NEW CITY HALL BUILDING
Lexington and State Highway 110
Mendota Heights, MN.
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120
ARCHITECT:
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:
CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACT FOR:
APPLICATION DATE: 12/11/90
PERIOD FROM:
7/10/89
Lindberg Pierce, Inc.
The
New
Joseph Company, Inc.
City Hall
APPLICATION NO: Final
TO 12/10/90
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
Change Orders approved
in previous months by
Owner —
TOTAL
ADDITIONS $
DEDUCTIONS $
Subsequent Change Orders
Number
Approved
(date)
G-1
9,169.00
G-2,3,4,5,6
41,464.55
G-7
1,510.88
I G-8
598.46
TOTALS
Net change by Change Orders
$ + 30,186.21
State of: Minnesota
County of: Mower
The undersigned Contractor certifies that the Work covered by this Appli-
cation for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract
Documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which
previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from
the Owner, and that the current payment shown herein is now due.
Contra
By:
aosepi Company
yt)S
Alicea4g.
Date:
12/11/90
Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract.
Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G702A, is attached
The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM $ 1, 054, 000.00
Net change by Change Orders $
CONTRACT SUM TO DATE $
30,186.21
1,084,186.21
TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE $
(Column G on G702A)
RETAINAGE % $
or as noted in Column I on G702A
TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE
1,084,186.21
t ole1, l2.6 .Z t
LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT $ 1,067,908.60
1(1277.(ot
CURRENT PAYMENT DUE $
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11'0
Notary Public:
r/.--4---------.
/ - J f -)
My Commission expires: � —
December 199
day of
December
' 19 90
In accofdance with the or�tract and this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. 0 OWNER
Architect: �� 0 ARCHITECT
0 CONTRACTOR
❑
0
This Certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named herein and its issuance, payment and acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor
By:
AIA DOCUv ;702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • MARCH 1971 EDITION • AIA®
,heir Contract.
)
APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT
AIA DOCUMENT G702
PAGE ONE OF PAGES
PROJECT:
(name, address)
TO (Owner)
ATTN:
NEW CITY HALL BUILDING
Lexington and State Highway 110
Mendota Heights, MN.
City of Mendota Heights
750 South Plaza Drive
Mendota Heights, Mn. 55120
ARCHITECT:
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO:
CONTRACTOR:
CONTRACT FOR:
APPLICATION DATE: 12/11/90
PERIOD FROM:
7/10/89
Lindberg Pierce, Inc.
The
New
Joseph Company, Inc.
City Hall
APPLICATION NO: Final
TO 12/10/90
CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY
Change Orders approved
in previous months by
Owner —
TOTAL
ADDITIONS $
DEDUCTIONS $
Subsequent Change Orders
Number
Approved
(date)
G-1
9,169.00
G-2,3,4,5,6
41,464.55
G-7
1,510.88
I G-8
598.46
TOTALS
Net change by Change Orders
$ + 30,186.21
State of: Minnesota
County of: Mower
The undersigned Contractor certifies that the Work covered by this Appli-
cation for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract
Documents, that all amounts have been paid by him for Work for which
previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from
the Owner, and that the current payment shown herein is now due.
Contra
By:
aosepi Company
yt)S
Alicea4g.
Date:
12/11/90
Application is made for Payment, as shown below, in connection with the Contract.
Continuation Sheet, AIA Document G702A, is attached
The present status of the account for this Contract is as follows:
ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM $ 1, 054, 000.00
Net change by Change Orders $
CONTRACT SUM TO DATE $
30,186.21
1,084,186.21
TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED TO DATE $
(Column G on G702A)
RETAINAGE % $
or as noted in Column I on G702A
TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE
1,084,186.21
t ole1, l2.6 .Z t
LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT $ 1,067,908.60
1(1277.(ot
CURRENT PAYMENT DUE $
Subscribed and sworn to before me this 11'0
Notary Public:
r/.--4---------.
/ - J f -)
My Commission expires: � —
December 199
day of
December
' 19 90
In accofdance with the or�tract and this Application for Payment the Contractor is entitled to payment in the amount shown above. 0 OWNER
Architect: �� 0 ARCHITECT
0 CONTRACTOR
❑
0
This Certificate is not negotiable. It is payable only to the payee named herein and its issuance, payment and acceptance are without prejudice to any rights of the Owner or Contractor
By:
AIA DOCUv ;702 • APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT • MARCH 1971 EDITION • AIA®
,heir Contract.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 1, 1990
To: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manage
Subject: Mendakota Community Park
Approval of Final Plans and Specifications and Ordering
Advertisment for Bids
DISCUSSION
Barry Warner, of Barton-Aschman, at the direction of City
Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission, has prepared final
plans and specifications for the Mendakota Community Park. These
final plans are based upon discussions with City Council, the Park
and Recreation Commission and City staff throughout December and
January.
Guy Kullander will be prepared to present color detailed plans
for the proposed amenities and layout at the Council meeting.
Barton-Aschman cost estimates will be available Tuesday evening
also. Since Council last saw the preliminary plans minor changes
have occurred including the addition of lighting in the parking
lot, the enlargement of the picnic shelter into a dual purpose
picnic shelter/pavillion/band shell and the confirmation of the
loop trail.
RECOMMENDATION
The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously recommended
that City Council approve the Mendakota Community Park plans
according to the preliminary plans they reviewed and approved with
the knowledge that the final plans would incorporate minor changes.
Councilmember Blesener has overseen /the incorporation of these
changes into the final plans, has reviewed the plans with staff and
given her recommendation of approval.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council so desires, they should pass a motion accepting the
Final Plans and Specifications for Mendakota Community Park and
authorize staff to advertise for bids based upon the plan.
Note: We propose that staff open bids on March 11, 1991 for
Parks and Recreation Commission review on March 12, 1991
in order that their recommendation proceeds to City
Council for consideration of bid award on March 19, 1991.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
February 1, 1990
To: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assist
Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manage
Subject: Mendakota Community Park
Approval of Final Plans and Specifications and Ordering
Advertisment for Bids
DISCUSSION
Barry Warner, of Barton-Aschman, at the direction of City
Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission, has prepared final
plans and specifications for the Mendakota Community Park. These
final plans are based upon discussions with City Council, the Park
and Recreation Commission and City staff throughout December and
January.
Guy Kullander will be prepared to present color detailed plans
for the proposed amenities and layout at the Council meeting.
Barton-Aschman cost estimates will be available Tuesday evening
also. Since Council last saw the preliminary plans minor changes
have occurred including the addition of lighting in the parking
lot, the enlargement of the picnic shelter into a dual purpose
picnic shelter/pavillion/band shell and the confirmation of the
loop trail.
RECOMMENDATION
The Parks and Recreation Commission unanimously recommended
that City Council approve the Mendakota Community Park plans
according to the preliminary plans they reviewed and approved with
the knowledge that the final plans would incorporate minor changes.
Councilmember Blesener has overseen /the incorporation of these
changes into the final plans, has reviewed the plans with staff and
given her recommendation of approval.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council so desires, they should pass a motion accepting the
Final Plans and Specifications for Mendakota Community Park and
authorize staff to advertise for bids based upon the plan.
Note: We propose that staff open bids on March 11, 1991 for
Parks and Recreation Commission review on March 12, 1991
in order that their recommendation proceeds to City
Council for consideration of bid award on March 19, 1991.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: James E. Dani
Public Works
January 9, 1991
and Guy Kullander
Park Project Manager /I
SUBJECT: Architect Agr ment for Mendakota Park
DISCUSSION:
City Council approved an architectural agreement with Station
19 Architects at their January 2, 1991 meeting to complete the
architecture for Mendakota Park. The original contract was for
Station 19 to design a $75,000 comfort station, a small picnic
shelter and produce a band shell sketch. Since that meeting
Councilmember Biesener has worked with the architect, staff, and
the Park and Recreation Commission to combine the picnic shelter
and the band shell into one, larger, dual purpose building and to
add a Kiosk. Barton/Aschman has recommended adding the Kiosk at
the entrance to the park by the parking lot. Estimated costs for
these three structures are: comfort station $75,000, picnic
shelter/band pavilion - $35,000, Kiosk - $5,000.
The architect's original contract was approved for $7,600,
however because of the increased scope of the project they have
requested an additional $1,750 compensation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Because of the increased scope of the architectural work for
the Mendakota Park construction we feel that additional compensa-
tion is justified and we recommend that the agreement with Sta-
tion 19 Architects be amended to include a $1,750 increase.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they
should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor to execute the agree-
ment with Station 19 Architects, Inc.
JED : dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini
FROM: James E. Dani
Public Works
January 9, 1991
and Guy Kullander
Park Project Manager /I
SUBJECT: Architect Agr ment for Mendakota Park
DISCUSSION:
City Council approved an architectural agreement with Station
19 Architects at their January 2, 1991 meeting to complete the
architecture for Mendakota Park. The original contract was for
Station 19 to design a $75,000 comfort station, a small picnic
shelter and produce a band shell sketch. Since that meeting
Councilmember Biesener has worked with the architect, staff, and
the Park and Recreation Commission to combine the picnic shelter
and the band shell into one, larger, dual purpose building and to
add a Kiosk. Barton/Aschman has recommended adding the Kiosk at
the entrance to the park by the parking lot. Estimated costs for
these three structures are: comfort station $75,000, picnic
shelter/band pavilion - $35,000, Kiosk - $5,000.
The architect's original contract was approved for $7,600,
however because of the increased scope of the project they have
requested an additional $1,750 compensation.
RECOMMENDATION:
Because of the increased scope of the architectural work for
the Mendakota Park construction we feel that additional compensa-
tion is justified and we recommend that the agreement with Sta-
tion 19 Architects be amended to include a $1,750 increase.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they
should pass a motion authorizing the Mayor to execute the agree-
ment with Station 19 Architects, Inc.
JED : dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: Commission Appointments and Reappointments
February 1, 1991
INTRODUCTION
Council is being asked to consider a number of issues related
to resident service on the City's Planning and Parks and Recreation
Commissions. More specifically, we need to consider the
reappointment of a number of members whose terms recently expired,
and we need to address the appointment of a new member to the
Planning Commission.
COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENTS
Due to the four year staggered arrangement of Commission
terms, annually a number of Commission members are up for
reappointment. Terms of the following individuals recently expired
on January 31, 1991:
PLANNING COMMISSION
Mike Dwyer
Dan Tilsen
All
continue
of the
service
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Carol Damberg
Steven Kleinglass
Stephen Hunter
above individuals have indicated a
on their respective Commissions.
NEW PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
desire to
As you are all aware, Jerry Morson recently retired from
service on the Planning Commission. To fill the resulting vacancy,
we have actively advertised for interested residents and to date we
have received four Letters of Inquiry (see attached). Should
additional letters be received prior to Tuesday's Council meeting,
they will be distributed as part of the Add On Agenda.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ
SUBJECT: Commission Appointments and Reappointments
February 1, 1991
INTRODUCTION
Council is being asked to consider a number of issues related
to resident service on the City's Planning and Parks and Recreation
Commissions. More specifically, we need to consider the
reappointment of a number of members whose terms recently expired,
and we need to address the appointment of a new member to the
Planning Commission.
COMMISSION REAPPOINTMENTS
Due to the four year staggered arrangement of Commission
terms, annually a number of Commission members are up for
reappointment. Terms of the following individuals recently expired
on January 31, 1991:
PLANNING COMMISSION
Mike Dwyer
Dan Tilsen
All
continue
of the
service
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Carol Damberg
Steven Kleinglass
Stephen Hunter
above individuals have indicated a
on their respective Commissions.
NEW PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT
desire to
As you are all aware, Jerry Morson recently retired from
service on the Planning Commission. To fill the resulting vacancy,
we have actively advertised for interested residents and to date we
have received four Letters of Inquiry (see attached). Should
additional letters be received prior to Tuesday's Council meeting,
they will be distributed as part of the Add On Agenda.
In years past, the procedure utilized to appoin
Commissioners has been as follows:
new
1. Council receives and reviews Letters of Interest.
2. Council schedules a period of time immediately before the
next Council meeting in which to interview interested
candidates.
3. Appointments are typically made later that evening as part
of the regular meeting.
Should Council elect to follow the above process this year,
the logical meeting date would be February 19, 1991. If that date
is agreeable, Council should adjourn Tuesday's Council meeting to
an early starting time of your choice on February 19th.
ACTION REOUIRED
Council should consider the reappointment of the identified
individuals to additional terms on their respective Commissions,
and should discuss the desired process for appointing a new
Planning Commissioner.
MTL:kkb
In years past, the procedure utilized to appoin
Commissioners has been as follows:
new
1. Council receives and reviews Letters of Interest.
2. Council schedules a period of time immediately before the
next Council meeting in which to interview interested
candidates.
3. Appointments are typically made later that evening as part
of the regular meeting.
Should Council elect to follow the above process this year,
the logical meeting date would be February 19, 1991. If that date
is agreeable, Council should adjourn Tuesday's Council meeting to
an early starting time of your choice on February 19th.
ACTION REOUIRED
Council should consider the reappointment of the identified
individuals to additional terms on their respective Commissions,
and should discuss the desired process for appointing a new
Planning Commissioner.
MTL:kkb
Bob Emery
1183 Dodd Rd.
Mendota Hgts., Mn 55118
Mr. Charles Mertensotto
c/o City of Mendota Hgts.
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Hgts., Mn 55118
01-29-91
Dear Sir,
I wish to apply for the position, opening up, on the
planning commission for the city of Mendota Hgts.
If familiarity with the community is a qualification for
this position, my 35 years in the area should provide me with
a good perspective for the future.
My wife and I, along with our two children, have grown
and prospered in Mendota Hgts, for the past twenty years. As
well as being involved in local activities through the public
schools, Cub Scouts, West St. Paul and Mend -Eagan athletics,
and church organizations.
I appreciate your consideration and await your decision.
Bob Emery
1183 Dodd Rd.
Mendota Hgts., Mn 55118
Mr. Charles Mertensotto
c/o City of Mendota Hgts.
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Hgts., Mn 55118
01-29-91
Dear Sir,
I wish to apply for the position, opening up, on the
planning commission for the city of Mendota Hgts.
If familiarity with the community is a qualification for
this position, my 35 years in the area should provide me with
a good perspective for the future.
My wife and I, along with our two children, have grown
and prospered in Mendota Hgts, for the past twenty years. As
well as being involved in local activities through the public
schools, Cub Scouts, West St. Paul and Mend -Eagan athletics,
and church organizations.
I appreciate your consideration and await your decision.
Richard C. Herzog
703 Maple Park Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
(612)457-8398
January 16, 1991
Honorable Charles Mertensotto, Mayor
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Mertensotto:
This letter is a request for consideration for the voluntary position on the Mendota
Heights Planning Commission recently announced in the Sun Current. The article stated
that the position opening was due to a vacancy effective January 31, 1991.
Attached is a current resume giving only a very brief outline of the highlights of my
career. I would very much like an opportunity to speak to you or the Council about my
background and why I feel qualified for the position. In addition, my current employ-
ment in the academic community assures a significant degree of objectivity and integrity
and at the same time permits and encourages community involvement and commitment.
Most importantly, my service in St. Louis, both in the design and construction business
and later as director of a local governmental agency, will provide a valuable resource
and dimension to Mendota Heights. I have had the good fortune of sitting on the
Mayor's cabinet, working closely with the St. Louis Land Reutilization Authority, the Bi -
State Growth and Economic Development Authority and the US department of Housing
and Urban Development. I have a very detailed working knowledge of drawing and
reading blueprints, interpreting various housing and building codes including but not
limited to the BOCA, Southern, Uniform, St. Louis and the Mendota Heights Building
Code in addition to the National Fire Protection Association codes.
It would be an honor to be given the opportunity once again to serve my community in
an area in which I am well qualified and experienced to make a positive contribution.
Sincerely,
Richard C. Herzog
Richard C. Herzog
703 Maple Park Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
(612)457-8398
January 16, 1991
Honorable Charles Mertensotto, Mayor
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Mertensotto:
This letter is a request for consideration for the voluntary position on the Mendota
Heights Planning Commission recently announced in the Sun Current. The article stated
that the position opening was due to a vacancy effective January 31, 1991.
Attached is a current resume giving only a very brief outline of the highlights of my
career. I would very much like an opportunity to speak to you or the Council about my
background and why I feel qualified for the position. In addition, my current employ-
ment in the academic community assures a significant degree of objectivity and integrity
and at the same time permits and encourages community involvement and commitment.
Most importantly, my service in St. Louis, both in the design and construction business
and later as director of a local governmental agency, will provide a valuable resource
and dimension to Mendota Heights. I have had the good fortune of sitting on the
Mayor's cabinet, working closely with the St. Louis Land Reutilization Authority, the Bi -
State Growth and Economic Development Authority and the US department of Housing
and Urban Development. I have a very detailed working knowledge of drawing and
reading blueprints, interpreting various housing and building codes including but not
limited to the BOCA, Southern, Uniform, St. Louis and the Mendota Heights Building
Code in addition to the National Fire Protection Association codes.
It would be an honor to be given the opportunity once again to serve my community in
an area in which I am well qualified and experienced to make a positive contribution.
Sincerely,
Richard C. Herzog
RESUME
RICHARD HERZOG
703 Maple Park Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
(612) 457-8398
CAREER OBJECTIVES
To continue acquiring skills in the area of financial planning and management.
To provide institutional planning in the area of physical plant and property management.
To provide computerized cost control systems for financial management.
EDUCATION
Master of Finan ce, St. Louis University 1977
BS-Business/Economics, Washington University, St. Louis 1968
WORK EXPERIENCE
1980 - Present
1978 - 1980
1977 - 1980
1973 - 1976
1970 - 1973
1964 - 1970
1962 - 1964
MILITARY
1961-1963
College Professor, Concordia & Augsburg, Twin Cities
Director, St. Louis Housing Authority and Finance Corporation
Planning Director, Concordia Seminary, St. Louis
Engineering Consultant at Helmuth, Obata and Kassabaum Architects &
Engineers, St. Louis
President/Owner, American Automatic Fire Protection Co., St. Louis
Sales Engineer, Viking Fire Protection Co., St. Louis
Loan Officer, Bank of Highland Park, Illinois
Comproller's Office, 5th Army Headquarters, Chicago
(Computer programming and budgeting)
CURRENT PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
National Association of Investors, Chairman of the Board
American Association of Individual Investors, Life member
Association for Business Ethics
EXTRA CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
Church choir member
Faculty advisor to student investment club
Member of the Minni-Paul Investment Club
Member of the Longfellow Investment Club
PERSONAL DATA
Birth Date: July 16, 1939
Marital Status: Married, two children
Hobbies: Reading, gardening
RESUME
RICHARD HERZOG
703 Maple Park Court
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
(612) 457-8398
CAREER OBJECTIVES
To continue acquiring skills in the area of financial planning and management.
To provide institutional planning in the area of physical plant and property management.
To provide computerized cost control systems for financial management.
EDUCATION
Master of Finan ce, St. Louis University 1977
BS-Business/Economics, Washington University, St. Louis 1968
WORK EXPERIENCE
1980 - Present
1978 - 1980
1977 - 1980
1973 - 1976
1970 - 1973
1964 - 1970
1962 - 1964
MILITARY
1961-1963
College Professor, Concordia & Augsburg, Twin Cities
Director, St. Louis Housing Authority and Finance Corporation
Planning Director, Concordia Seminary, St. Louis
Engineering Consultant at Helmuth, Obata and Kassabaum Architects &
Engineers, St. Louis
President/Owner, American Automatic Fire Protection Co., St. Louis
Sales Engineer, Viking Fire Protection Co., St. Louis
Loan Officer, Bank of Highland Park, Illinois
Comproller's Office, 5th Army Headquarters, Chicago
(Computer programming and budgeting)
CURRENT PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
National Association of Investors, Chairman of the Board
American Association of Individual Investors, Life member
Association for Business Ethics
EXTRA CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES
Church choir member
Faculty advisor to student investment club
Member of the Minni-Paul Investment Club
Member of the Longfellow Investment Club
PERSONAL DATA
Birth Date: July 16, 1939
Marital Status: Married, two children
Hobbies: Reading, gardening
January 10, 1991
Mayor Charles Mertensotto
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mayor Mertensotto:
I recently read in the local paper that you were looking
applicants for the Mendota Heights Planning Commission.
By way of introduction, my wife and I have been residents of
Mendota Heights since 1978. We have raised six children that have
all been active in Mend -Eagan Athletic Association and five of them
have graduated from Henry Sibley High School. Our youngest child
is presently a junior at Sibley.
We are-members,of St. Stephen's Lutheran Church in West St. Paul
and I have been an active member of the Church Council for the past
several years.
I am 48 years old and own a mechanical contracting company in St.
Paul. I have an extensive background in the building construction
field and deal with numerous projects in the surrounding
communities. I am very interested and concerned about the future
of Mendota Heights.
Please consider me when selecting members of your Planning
Commission.
James N. Packer
635 W. Highway 110
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
452-7047 (h)
488-0291 (w)
January 10, 1991
Mayor Charles Mertensotto
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mayor Mertensotto:
I recently read in the local paper that you were looking
applicants for the Mendota Heights Planning Commission.
By way of introduction, my wife and I have been residents of
Mendota Heights since 1978. We have raised six children that have
all been active in Mend -Eagan Athletic Association and five of them
have graduated from Henry Sibley High School. Our youngest child
is presently a junior at Sibley.
We are-members,of St. Stephen's Lutheran Church in West St. Paul
and I have been an active member of the Church Council for the past
several years.
I am 48 years old and own a mechanical contracting company in St.
Paul. I have an extensive background in the building construction
field and deal with numerous projects in the surrounding
communities. I am very interested and concerned about the future
of Mendota Heights.
Please consider me when selecting members of your Planning
Commission.
James N. Packer
635 W. Highway 110
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
452-7047 (h)
488-0291 (w)
January 4, 1991
Mayor Charles E. Mertensotto
and the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Vacancy on the Planning Commission
Dear Mayor Mertensotto and Members of the City Council:
Application is hereby made by the undersigned for appointment to the vacant
position on the City Planning Commission. While I believe that my background and
qualifications are known to most members of the City Council, I have, for convenience,
attached a summary.
I have been a resident of the City of Mendota Heights since 1957 and have been
active in community matters in Mendota Heights, Independent School District #197 and
St. Paul. I have an extensive background in municipal work, having served both the cities
of Prior Lake and Falcon Heights as City Attorney and City Prosecutor for a total of over
12 years.
have served as legislative draftsman, technical advisor and lobbyist to numerous
municipal governments and to various agencies of the State of Minnesota, including the
St. Paul Port Authority, the St. Paul School District, the Metropolitan Council, the
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority and to the Revisor of Statutes of the State
of Minnesota.
have drafted both zoning and building codes, and amendments thereto, for a
number of municipal governments and have been involved, representing both
municipalities and taxpayers, in litigation over such codes.
January 4, 1991
Mayor Charles E. Mertensotto
and the City Council of the
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
RE: Vacancy on the Planning Commission
Dear Mayor Mertensotto and Members of the City Council:
Application is hereby made by the undersigned for appointment to the vacant
position on the City Planning Commission. While I believe that my background and
qualifications are known to most members of the City Council, I have, for convenience,
attached a summary.
I have been a resident of the City of Mendota Heights since 1957 and have been
active in community matters in Mendota Heights, Independent School District #197 and
St. Paul. I have an extensive background in municipal work, having served both the cities
of Prior Lake and Falcon Heights as City Attorney and City Prosecutor for a total of over
12 years.
have served as legislative draftsman, technical advisor and lobbyist to numerous
municipal governments and to various agencies of the State of Minnesota, including the
St. Paul Port Authority, the St. Paul School District, the Metropolitan Council, the
Minnesota Higher Education Facilities Authority and to the Revisor of Statutes of the State
of Minnesota.
have drafted both zoning and building codes, and amendments thereto, for a
number of municipal governments and have been involved, representing both
municipalities and taxpayers, in litigation over such codes.
Mayor Charles E. Mertensotto
Members of the City Council
January 4, 1991
Page 2
was the author (with one of my partners at Briggs and Morgan) of the Western
Lake Superior Sanitary District Law which provides for the establishment, financing and
operation of the water and sanitary sewer systems of the Duluth and Cloquet areas and
many smaller adjacent communities. I have been a regular speaker, both locally and
nationally, on municipal matters ranging from assessments for local improvements to the
federally mandated requirement of municipal bond registration.
was extensively involved in three ISD #197 bond issue proposals during the
1960s which resulted in providing funds for the construction of many facilities, including
Sibley High School.
I continue to be deeply concerned about plans for development and particularly
concerned about how those plans may impact residents of the community and how they
will affect our quality of life.
Very truly yours,
Bernard P. Friel
BPF/wkh
Enc.
Mayor Charles E. Mertensotto
Members of the City Council
January 4, 1991
Page 2
was the author (with one of my partners at Briggs and Morgan) of the Western
Lake Superior Sanitary District Law which provides for the establishment, financing and
operation of the water and sanitary sewer systems of the Duluth and Cloquet areas and
many smaller adjacent communities. I have been a regular speaker, both locally and
nationally, on municipal matters ranging from assessments for local improvements to the
federally mandated requirement of municipal bond registration.
was extensively involved in three ISD #197 bond issue proposals during the
1960s which resulted in providing funds for the construction of many facilities, including
Sibley High School.
I continue to be deeply concerned about plans for development and particularly
concerned about how those plans may impact residents of the community and how they
will affect our quality of life.
Very truly yours,
Bernard P. Friel
BPF/wkh
Enc.
Name:
Home Address:
Date of Birth:
Place of Birth:
Marital Status: •
Wife's Name:
Children:
Employment
1956 to February, 1985
and December 1, 1990
to present:
February, 1985 to
December 1, 1990:
Formal Education
BERNARD P. FRIEL
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Bernard Preston Friel
750 Mohican Lane, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
(Resident Mendota Heights since 1957)
August 23, 1930
St. Paul, Minnesota
Married
Damaris Kathryn (nee Hofer) Friel
Kimberly Countryman Friel, Deirdre Lee Friel, and
Kevin Scott Friel
Associate and Senior Partner with the
St. Paul and Minneapolis law firm of
Briggs and Morgan, P.A.
Vice Chairman and General Counsel
HEAF Management Corporation and
HEMAR Corporation
St. Paul, Minnesota
Undergraduate degree (BSL) and law degree (LLB),
University of Minnesota - 1954
Name:
Home Address:
Date of Birth:
Place of Birth:
Marital Status: •
Wife's Name:
Children:
Employment
1956 to February, 1985
and December 1, 1990
to present:
February, 1985 to
December 1, 1990:
Formal Education
BERNARD P. FRIEL
BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
Bernard Preston Friel
750 Mohican Lane, Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120
(Resident Mendota Heights since 1957)
August 23, 1930
St. Paul, Minnesota
Married
Damaris Kathryn (nee Hofer) Friel
Kimberly Countryman Friel, Deirdre Lee Friel, and
Kevin Scott Friel
Associate and Senior Partner with the
St. Paul and Minneapolis law firm of
Briggs and Morgan, P.A.
Vice Chairman and General Counsel
HEAF Management Corporation and
HEMAR Corporation
St. Paul, Minnesota
Undergraduate degree (BSL) and law degree (LLB),
University of Minnesota - 1954
Biographical Information
Bernard P. Friel
Page 2
Military Service
Active Duty 1954-1956 Attained the rank of Captain,
Reserve 1956 - 1961 United States Air Force Reserve
Admitted to Practice of Law
1954 Minnesota Supreme Court
1958 United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
1959 United States Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
Legal Practice and Bar Activities
1979-1980
1983 to 1987
1956 to Date
President and Board Member, National Association of Municipal
Bond Lawyers
Member of the Council; Urban, State and Local Government Law
Section of the American Bar Association
Member; Ramsey County, Minnesota and American Bar
Associations, and many committees of each
Community Activities
1985 - 1990 Member; Minneapolis and St. Paul Metropolitan Aircraft Sound
Abatement Council
1982 - 1984
1980 - 1984
Member, Board of Directors; Twin City Marathon, Inc.
Member, Board of Directors; Thomas Irvine Dodge Foundation
(Nature Center)
1980 - 1984 Member, Board of Directors; Project Environment Foundation
(Sierra Club Foundation)
Biographical Information
Bernard P. Friel
Page 2
Military Service
Active Duty 1954-1956 Attained the rank of Captain,
Reserve 1956 - 1961 United States Air Force Reserve
Admitted to Practice of Law
1954 Minnesota Supreme Court
1958 United States District Court for the District of Minnesota
1959 United States Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals
Legal Practice and Bar Activities
1979-1980
1983 to 1987
1956 to Date
President and Board Member, National Association of Municipal
Bond Lawyers
Member of the Council; Urban, State and Local Government Law
Section of the American Bar Association
Member; Ramsey County, Minnesota and American Bar
Associations, and many committees of each
Community Activities
1985 - 1990 Member; Minneapolis and St. Paul Metropolitan Aircraft Sound
Abatement Council
1982 - 1984
1980 - 1984
Member, Board of Directors; Twin City Marathon, Inc.
Member, Board of Directors; Thomas Irvine Dodge Foundation
(Nature Center)
1980 - 1984 Member, Board of Directors; Project Environment Foundation
(Sierra Club Foundation)
Biographical Information
Bernard P. Friel
Page 3
1973 - 1983
1971 - 1979
1976 - 1979
Member, Board of Directors and General Counsel; American Heart
Association, Minnesota Affiliate, Inc.
Member and Chairman; Minnesota Higher Education Facilities
Authority (a State agency)
Member, Board of Directors; St. Paul Athletic Club
1975 - 1977 Member, Board of Directors; Voyageur Outward Bound School
1966 - 1975 Member; American Trial Lawyers Association
1967 - 1969 Member; School Board, West St. Paul -Mendota Heights
1967 - 1968 Member, Board of Directors; Minnesota Association for Retarded
Citizens
1965 - 1967 First Vice President and President; St. Paul Association for
Retarded Citizens
1965 Member; State of Minnesota Mental Retardation Planning Council
Awards and Recognition
1965 Named one of the Ten Outstanding Young Men in Minnesota
1964 Received the Greater St. Paul United Way Community Service
Award for 1964
1982 Bernard P. Friel Award for outstanding contribution in the
field of municipal finance created by the National Association of
Bond Lawyers for outstanding service in the municipal finance
area
1989 Inducted into St. Paul Central High School Hall of Fame for
graduates whose leadership and achievements have made
significant contributions to society
e
Biographical Information
Bernard P. Friel
Page 3
1973 - 1983
1971 - 1979
1976 - 1979
Member, Board of Directors and General Counsel; American Heart
Association, Minnesota Affiliate, Inc.
Member and Chairman; Minnesota Higher Education Facilities
Authority (a State agency)
Member, Board of Directors; St. Paul Athletic Club
1975 - 1977 Member, Board of Directors; Voyageur Outward Bound School
1966 - 1975 Member; American Trial Lawyers Association
1967 - 1969 Member; School Board, West St. Paul -Mendota Heights
1967 - 1968 Member, Board of Directors; Minnesota Association for Retarded
Citizens
1965 - 1967 First Vice President and President; St. Paul Association for
Retarded Citizens
1965 Member; State of Minnesota Mental Retardation Planning Council
Awards and Recognition
1965 Named one of the Ten Outstanding Young Men in Minnesota
1964 Received the Greater St. Paul United Way Community Service
Award for 1964
1982 Bernard P. Friel Award for outstanding contribution in the
field of municipal finance created by the National Association of
Bond Lawyers for outstanding service in the municipal finance
area
1989 Inducted into St. Paul Central High School Hall of Fame for
graduates whose leadership and achievements have made
significant contributions to society
e
Biographical Information
Bernard P. Friel
Page 4
Hobbies and Recreational Activities
Running, photography, cinematography, canoeing, backpacking,
rafting, kayaking, rock climbing, mountain climbing, gardening, wood
working and furniture -making
Relevant Experience
1958 - 1968
1963 - 1968
1970 - 1980
1970 - 1980
1958 - 1985
1958 - 1985
City Attorney, Prior Lake
City Attorney, Falcon Heights
Advisor to the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota
Advisor to the Minnesota Municipal Finance Council, an organization
of underwriters
Drafting experience involving municipal zoning codes, building
codes and amendments thereto
Bond counsel to scores of Minnesota municipalities, several counties,
the Metropolitan Council, the State of Minnesota, Minnesota Higher
Education Coordinating Board and numerous school districts
including Independent School District 197 and the City of Saint Paul
School District
1972 Authored with one of my partners the Western Lake Superior Sanitary
District Law which established the sewage district for the Duluth -
Cloquet area
Biographical Information
Bernard P. Friel
Page 4
Hobbies and Recreational Activities
Running, photography, cinematography, canoeing, backpacking,
rafting, kayaking, rock climbing, mountain climbing, gardening, wood
working and furniture -making
Relevant Experience
1958 - 1968
1963 - 1968
1970 - 1980
1970 - 1980
1958 - 1985
1958 - 1985
City Attorney, Prior Lake
City Attorney, Falcon Heights
Advisor to the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota
Advisor to the Minnesota Municipal Finance Council, an organization
of underwriters
Drafting experience involving municipal zoning codes, building
codes and amendments thereto
Bond counsel to scores of Minnesota municipalities, several counties,
the Metropolitan Council, the State of Minnesota, Minnesota Higher
Education Coordinating Board and numerous school districts
including Independent School District 197 and the City of Saint Paul
School District
1972 Authored with one of my partners the Western Lake Superior Sanitary
District Law which established the sewage district for the Duluth -
Cloquet area
v - s :Jt oa. _. AA( t o . c,Q,
A \ ct cl,U
c& c&c Qs c (jv\
GSL
February 1, 1991
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Mn 55118
Attn: Tom Lawell
City Administrator
Dear Tom:
Thank you for notifying me on
Planning Commission.
This letter is to serve as an
Planning Commission.
the appointment that's pending on the
application for the posistion on the
As way of some background, I am presently employed as Vice President
of Dakota County State Bank with responsibilities including the
supervision of its branches and the loan portfolio.
I had been employed at American National Bank, St. Paul for
approximately seven years prior to joining Dakota County State Bank
in January 1990.
As you know, Tom, I am involved in several community functions which
include: Chamber of Commerce, area YMCA, Dakota, Inc., Corporate
Public Board Member, etc.
As you also know, I have been a resident of Mendota Heights since
October 1989 and reside here with my wife, Karrine and my two daughters;
Justine and Brittany.
Since we made a commitment to the Mendota Heights area, I am very inter-
ested in becoming involved in the growth and the changes of the city
for its future.
v - s :Jt oa. _. AA( t o . c,Q,
A \ ct cl,U
c& c&c Qs c (jv\
GSL
February 1, 1991
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Mn 55118
Attn: Tom Lawell
City Administrator
Dear Tom:
Thank you for notifying me on
Planning Commission.
This letter is to serve as an
Planning Commission.
the appointment that's pending on the
application for the posistion on the
As way of some background, I am presently employed as Vice President
of Dakota County State Bank with responsibilities including the
supervision of its branches and the loan portfolio.
I had been employed at American National Bank, St. Paul for
approximately seven years prior to joining Dakota County State Bank
in January 1990.
As you know, Tom, I am involved in several community functions which
include: Chamber of Commerce, area YMCA, Dakota, Inc., Corporate
Public Board Member, etc.
As you also know, I have been a resident of Mendota Heights since
October 1989 and reside here with my wife, Karrine and my two daughters;
Justine and Brittany.
Since we made a commitment to the Mendota Heights area, I am very inter-
ested in becoming involved in the growth and the changes of the city
for its future.
Tom, I would appreciate the opportinity to meet with you or the City
Council to discuss my qualifications.
Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from
you very soon.
JPS:ams
Tom, I would appreciate the opportinity to meet with you or the City
Council to discuss my qualifications.
Thank you for your consideration and I look forward to hearing from
you very soon.
JPS:ams
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Discussion of Upcoming Workshops
February 1, 1991
INTRODUCTION
-During the past month, Council has periodically discussed
plans for conducting two special Council workshops - one to discuss
goal setting for 1991 and another to discuss team building efforts.
It is the intent of this memo to suggest a tentative time line and
format for conducting these workshops.
TARGET ISSUE WORKSHOP
Historically, the City has maintained a list of target issues
which serves as a work program for the coming year. We need to
review and update this list periodically, and it is proposed that
the City Council meet on Saturday, March 2, 1991, at City Hall from
8:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. to address the City's 1991 target issues.
This four hour session will allow staff to review progress made
over the past year, and will allow Council and staff to discuss
areas of concern and interest for the coming year. The objective
of this session will be to develop a revised target issue document
which will be considered for formal adoption at the Council's March
19th meeting.
TEAM BUILDING WORKSHOP
Council has periodically hosted a team building session with
the members of the City's Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation
Commission and staff to affirm our commitment to open communication
and high quality public service. This session allows all
participants to step back and view "the big picture" of why we
exist as a City, and how we can best accomplish our goals in close
cooperation with one another. Once again, the City has invited
Mr. Don Salverda to moderate the group discussion which is
tentatively scheduled for Saturday, March 23, 1991 at City Hall
from 8:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. Mr. Salverda has consented to this
date and I plan to meet with him next week to learn more about his
proposed approach to the session.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Discussion of Upcoming Workshops
February 1, 1991
INTRODUCTION
-During the past month, Council has periodically discussed
plans for conducting two special Council workshops - one to discuss
goal setting for 1991 and another to discuss team building efforts.
It is the intent of this memo to suggest a tentative time line and
format for conducting these workshops.
TARGET ISSUE WORKSHOP
Historically, the City has maintained a list of target issues
which serves as a work program for the coming year. We need to
review and update this list periodically, and it is proposed that
the City Council meet on Saturday, March 2, 1991, at City Hall from
8:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. to address the City's 1991 target issues.
This four hour session will allow staff to review progress made
over the past year, and will allow Council and staff to discuss
areas of concern and interest for the coming year. The objective
of this session will be to develop a revised target issue document
which will be considered for formal adoption at the Council's March
19th meeting.
TEAM BUILDING WORKSHOP
Council has periodically hosted a team building session with
the members of the City's Planning Commission, Parks and Recreation
Commission and staff to affirm our commitment to open communication
and high quality public service. This session allows all
participants to step back and view "the big picture" of why we
exist as a City, and how we can best accomplish our goals in close
cooperation with one another. Once again, the City has invited
Mr. Don Salverda to moderate the group discussion which is
tentatively scheduled for Saturday, March 23, 1991 at City Hall
from 8:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. Mr. Salverda has consented to this
date and I plan to meet with him next week to learn more about his
proposed approach to the session.
RECOMMENDATION
I feel that both sessions will be helpful to staff as we chart
our course for the coming year, and I feel that the workshop format
will be quiet conducive to an open exchange of ideas and concerns.
I recommend the Council schedule the two workshops as described
above.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council s in agreement with the above proposed schedule,
a motion shoul be made to set a target issue workshop for
Saturday, March ,3l, 1991, beginning at 8:30 A.M., and to set a team
building workshop for Saturday, March 23, 1991, also beginning at
8:30 A.M. With respect to the March 23rd team building session,
staff should also be directed to meet with Mr. Salverda to discuss
details related to his involvement in the session, and should be
directed to invite members of both the Planning Commission and
Parks and Recreation Commission to that session.
MTL:kkb
RECOMMENDATION
I feel that both sessions will be helpful to staff as we chart
our course for the coming year, and I feel that the workshop format
will be quiet conducive to an open exchange of ideas and concerns.
I recommend the Council schedule the two workshops as described
above.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council s in agreement with the above proposed schedule,
a motion shoul be made to set a target issue workshop for
Saturday, March ,3l, 1991, beginning at 8:30 A.M., and to set a team
building workshop for Saturday, March 23, 1991, also beginning at
8:30 A.M. With respect to the March 23rd team building session,
staff should also be directed to meet with Mr. Salverda to discuss
details related to his involvement in the session, and should be
directed to invite members of both the Planning Commission and
Parks and Recreation Commission to that session.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Decline Property Purchase Offer - 2370 Highway 55
February 5, 1991
INTRODUCTION
As Council is aware, engineering staff is in the final stages
of designing public utility improvements within the Furlong
Addition. As part of that process, staff has been in contact with
a number of property owners arranging for the dedication of
necessary easements. One of the affected parcels is part of the
Estate of Margaret M. Perron and a representative of the Estate
recently contacted staff to ask if the City is interested in
acquiring the property from the Estate.
DISCUSSION
A letter from Ms. Margaret Walker, a representative of the
Perron Estate, is attached which outlines the financial situation
which she presently faces. As Council may recall, previous
requests for property acquisition have been received from the
Furlong residents, and in 1989 two properties were actually
acquired. In early 1990, Council concluded that property
acquisition in the area was not in the best of the City, and
declared that no additional properties were to be acquired.
RECOMMENDATION
Given the progress being made in extending public utilities to
the area, the public purpose associated with further property
purchase within the Furlong area is questionable. Although we are
sympathetic to the financial concerns of the Perron Estate, the
acquisition of additional property in the Furlong neighborhood
would be inconsistent with our stated City policy for the area. I
recommend that Ms. Walker be advised that the City is not
interested in purchasing the Perron property at this time.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Decline Property Purchase Offer - 2370 Highway 55
February 5, 1991
INTRODUCTION
As Council is aware, engineering staff is in the final stages
of designing public utility improvements within the Furlong
Addition. As part of that process, staff has been in contact with
a number of property owners arranging for the dedication of
necessary easements. One of the affected parcels is part of the
Estate of Margaret M. Perron and a representative of the Estate
recently contacted staff to ask if the City is interested in
acquiring the property from the Estate.
DISCUSSION
A letter from Ms. Margaret Walker, a representative of the
Perron Estate, is attached which outlines the financial situation
which she presently faces. As Council may recall, previous
requests for property acquisition have been received from the
Furlong residents, and in 1989 two properties were actually
acquired. In early 1990, Council concluded that property
acquisition in the area was not in the best of the City, and
declared that no additional properties were to be acquired.
RECOMMENDATION
Given the progress being made in extending public utilities to
the area, the public purpose associated with further property
purchase within the Furlong area is questionable. Although we are
sympathetic to the financial concerns of the Perron Estate, the
acquisition of additional property in the Furlong neighborhood
would be inconsistent with our stated City policy for the area. I
recommend that Ms. Walker be advised that the City is not
interested in purchasing the Perron property at this time.
ACTION REQUIRED
Should Council concur that the acquisition of the Perron
property be declined, it should authorize staff to mail the
attached letter of notification to Ms. Walker advising her of the
City's decision.
MTL:kkb
ACTION REQUIRED
Should Council concur that the acquisition of the Perron
property be declined, it should authorize staff to mail the
attached letter of notification to Ms. Walker advising her of the
City's decision.
MTL:kkb
31 JAN91
DEAR SIR:
Margaret Perrons' property has been listed with a realtor.
We had two offers which we turned down, they didn't reach a
fair market value. I have been advised to ask the City of Mendota
Heights if you would be interested in purchasing this property.
I understand that in the past this was done in hardship
cases. I will liRt upcoming payments and some receipts to help
you see my dilemma. The reason is that I do not wish to incur
further expenses of a sewer accessment. We will not receive a
homestead reduction on taxes this year.
I have no assurance that i will get help to pay for the
sewer from the source you mentioned on the phone. Expenses are
as follows:
Attorney's Fee $1500 00 to 2,000.00
Taxes for 1990 approx $1200.00
State Farm Ins yrly 216.00
O'Halleron Funeral Home
total 4,119.00 Bal 1514.00
Burmingham Funeral Home
Pd by M. Walker & owed
to her 811.00
Insurance on furnace yrly 120.00
Dakota Co. Human service
claim 13,554.76
I would appreciate any help you can give me on this matter.
Sincerely,
Ms. Margaret
alker
31 JAN91
DEAR SIR:
Margaret Perrons' property has been listed with a realtor.
We had two offers which we turned down, they didn't reach a
fair market value. I have been advised to ask the City of Mendota
Heights if you would be interested in purchasing this property.
I understand that in the past this was done in hardship
cases. I will liRt upcoming payments and some receipts to help
you see my dilemma. The reason is that I do not wish to incur
further expenses of a sewer accessment. We will not receive a
homestead reduction on taxes this year.
I have no assurance that i will get help to pay for the
sewer from the source you mentioned on the phone. Expenses are
as follows:
Attorney's Fee $1500 00 to 2,000.00
Taxes for 1990 approx $1200.00
State Farm Ins yrly 216.00
O'Halleron Funeral Home
total 4,119.00 Bal 1514.00
Burmingham Funeral Home
Pd by M. Walker & owed
to her 811.00
Insurance on furnace yrly 120.00
Dakota Co. Human service
claim 13,554.76
I would appreciate any help you can give me on this matter.
Sincerely,
Ms. Margaret
alker
February 6, 1991
Ms. Margaret Walker
HCR61 Box 288
Dixon, Missouri 65459
Dear Ms. Walker:
Recently I received your letter dated January 31, 1991 in
which you offer to sell to the City property located at 2370
Highway 55 within Mendota Heights. This property is part -of the
Margaret M. Perron Estate for which you serve as a representative.
Your offer to sell this property to the City is appreciated,
however I must inform you that at this time we must decline your
offer.
On February 5, 1991 the Mendota Heights City Council formally
considered your request that the City purchase the property. As
you are aware, the City is currently in the process of designing a
sanitary sewer and water project for the area. This project is
planned for construction this summer and will hopefully alleviate
a number of problems being caused in the neighborhood by aged and
failing septic systems.
The decision to undertake this project was made after a
thorough analysis of other available options, including the
alternative of purchasing all residential properties in the area.
The City Council rejected this alternative in early 1990 reasoning
that a safe and reliable sewer and water system in the area will
enhance the marketability of homes, and will allow the neighborhood
to remain a viable and important part of our community.
I understand from your letter that other purchase offers for
the property have been less than Fair Market Value, and have been
declined. I am confident that the improved public utilities in the
area will significantly enhance the marketability of the property,
and hopefully will result in a more acceptable purchase offer from
an interested outside party.
February 6, 1991
Ms. Margaret Walker
HCR61 Box 288
Dixon, Missouri 65459
Dear Ms. Walker:
Recently I received your letter dated January 31, 1991 in
which you offer to sell to the City property located at 2370
Highway 55 within Mendota Heights. This property is part -of the
Margaret M. Perron Estate for which you serve as a representative.
Your offer to sell this property to the City is appreciated,
however I must inform you that at this time we must decline your
offer.
On February 5, 1991 the Mendota Heights City Council formally
considered your request that the City purchase the property. As
you are aware, the City is currently in the process of designing a
sanitary sewer and water project for the area. This project is
planned for construction this summer and will hopefully alleviate
a number of problems being caused in the neighborhood by aged and
failing septic systems.
The decision to undertake this project was made after a
thorough analysis of other available options, including the
alternative of purchasing all residential properties in the area.
The City Council rejected this alternative in early 1990 reasoning
that a safe and reliable sewer and water system in the area will
enhance the marketability of homes, and will allow the neighborhood
to remain a viable and important part of our community.
I understand from your letter that other purchase offers for
the property have been less than Fair Market Value, and have been
declined. I am confident that the improved public utilities in the
area will significantly enhance the marketability of the property,
and hopefully will result in a more acceptable purchase offer from
an interested outside party.
Ms. Margaret Walker
February 6, 1991
Page 2
Again, your efforts to make the property available to the City
are greatly appreciated, and we are disappointed that we are unable
to assist you at this time. Please feel free to contact me with
any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Tom Lawell
City Administrator
NITL:klcb
Ms. Margaret Walker
February 6, 1991
Page 2
Again, your efforts to make the property available to the City
are greatly appreciated, and we are disappointed that we are unable
to assist you at this time. Please feel free to contact me with
any questions or comments you may have.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Tom Lawell
City Administrator
NITL:klcb