Loading...
1991-01-15CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JANUARY 15, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. .Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of the January 2nd Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar a, Acknowledgment of the December Treasurer's Report. Acknowledgment of thejOctober\Fire Department Report. c. Acknowledgment of St. Paul Water's Water Rate Increase. d. Approval to Solicit Quotes and Issuance of a Purchase Order for a Plain Paper Facsimile Machine. 4---(e� Approval of the Barton-Aschman Professional Services ��// Contract. f. Letter of Appreciation - Dr. Thaddeus Chao. g. Approval of the List of Contractors. h. Approval of the List of Claims. * i. Acknowledgment of the January 8th Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes. * j. Acceptance of Letter of Resignation. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Comments 7. HEARING a. Cont. Hearing - CASE NO. 90-26: Con -Spec * 8:00 * MIST Corporation - CUP (Recommend Closing the Public Hearing) 8. Unfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties - Building Foundation Permit for Solvay Phase II. b. Street Light Requests. c. Update on Furlong Area Improvements. d. MnDOT Release of Excess Trunk Highway 149 Right -of -Way. e. Scheduling of the Board of Review Meeting. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JANUARY 15, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. .Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of the January 2nd Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar a, Acknowledgment of the December Treasurer's Report. Acknowledgment of thejOctober\Fire Department Report. c. Acknowledgment of St. Paul Water's Water Rate Increase. d. Approval to Solicit Quotes and Issuance of a Purchase Order for a Plain Paper Facsimile Machine. 4---(e� Approval of the Barton-Aschman Professional Services ��// Contract. f. Letter of Appreciation - Dr. Thaddeus Chao. g. Approval of the List of Contractors. h. Approval of the List of Claims. * i. Acknowledgment of the January 8th Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes. * j. Acceptance of Letter of Resignation. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Comments 7. HEARING a. Cont. Hearing - CASE NO. 90-26: Con -Spec * 8:00 * MIST Corporation - CUP (Recommend Closing the Public Hearing) 8. Unfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties - Building Foundation Permit for Solvay Phase II. b. Street Light Requests. c. Update on Furlong Area Improvements. d. MnDOT Release of Excess Trunk Highway 149 Right -of -Way. e. Scheduling of the Board of Review Meeting. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn ick ,? e)u • 'J . ick ,? e)u • 'J . CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for January 15th Council Meeting January 15, 1991 Two items have been added to the consent calendar of the agenda (*). 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council printed on pink paper. 5i. Acknowledgement of the January Commission Minutes. See attached minutes. 5j. Acceptance of Letter of Resignation. See attached letter and memo. MTL:kkb adopt the 8, 1991 Parks revised agenda and Recreation CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for January 15th Council Meeting January 15, 1991 Two items have been added to the consent calendar of the agenda (*). 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council printed on pink paper. 5i. Acknowledgement of the January Commission Minutes. See attached minutes. 5j. Acceptance of Letter of Resignation. See attached letter and memo. MTL:kkb adopt the 8, 1991 Parks revised agenda and Recreation CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JANUARY 15, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of the January 2nd Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the December Treasurer's Report. b. Acknowledgment of the October Fire Department Report. c. Acknowledgment of St. Paul Water's Water Rate Increase. d. Approval to Solicit Quotes and Issuance of a Purchase Order for a Plain Paper Facsimile Machine. e. Approval of the Barton-Aschman Professional Services Contract. f. Letter of Appreciation - Dr. Thaddeus Chao. g. Approval of the List of Contractors. h. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Comments 7. HEARING a. Cont. Hearing - CASE NO. 90-26: Con -Spec * 8:00 * MIST Corporation - CUP (Recommend Closing the Public Hearing) 8. Unfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties - Building Foundation Permit for Solvay Phase II. b. Street Light Requests. c. Update on Furlong Area Improvements. d. MnDOT Release of Excess Trunk Highway 149 Right -of -Way. e. Scheduling of the Board of Review Meeting. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AGENDA JANUARY 15, 1991 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of the January 2nd Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the December Treasurer's Report. b. Acknowledgment of the October Fire Department Report. c. Acknowledgment of St. Paul Water's Water Rate Increase. d. Approval to Solicit Quotes and Issuance of a Purchase Order for a Plain Paper Facsimile Machine. e. Approval of the Barton-Aschman Professional Services Contract. f. Letter of Appreciation - Dr. Thaddeus Chao. g. Approval of the List of Contractors. h. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Comments 7. HEARING a. Cont. Hearing - CASE NO. 90-26: Con -Spec * 8:00 * MIST Corporation - CUP (Recommend Closing the Public Hearing) 8. Unfinished and New Business a. CASE NO. 91-02: United Properties - Building Foundation Permit for Solvay Phase II. b. Street Light Requests. c. Update on Furlong Area Improvements. d. MnDOT Release of Excess Trunk Highway 149 Right -of -Way. e. Scheduling of the Board of Review Meeting. 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn Page No. 2993 January 2, 1991 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, January 2, 1991 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor -Elect Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, and Cummins, and Councilmembers-Elect Koch and Smith. OATH OF OFFICE AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Abstain: Koch Smith CONSENT CALENDAR The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Mertensotto, re-elected to a two-year term of office on November 6, 1990 and to Councilmembers Christine Koch and Jill Smith, elected to four-year terms of office on November 6, 1990. Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the December 18, 1990 regular meeting with correction. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Koch moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for December. b. Approval of 1991 amendments to the Recycling Joint Powers Agreement, and authorization for its execution by the Mayor. Page No. 2993 January 2, 1991 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, January 2, 1991 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Mayor -Elect Mertensotto, Councilmembers Blesener, and Cummins, and Councilmembers-Elect Koch and Smith. OATH OF OFFICE AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Abstain: Koch Smith CONSENT CALENDAR The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Mayor Mertensotto, re-elected to a two-year term of office on November 6, 1990 and to Councilmembers Christine Koch and Jill Smith, elected to four-year terms of office on November 6, 1990. Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the minutes of the December 18, 1990 regular meeting with correction. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Koch moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the Code Enforcement monthly report for December. b. Approval of 1991 amendments to the Recycling Joint Powers Agreement, and authorization for its execution by the Mayor. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CAMERA DONATION Page No. 2994 January 2, 1991 c. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-01, "RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1991 CITY DEPOSITORIES OF FUNDS." d. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-02, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITIES FOR 1991." e. Authorization for a wage rate adjustment to $11.00 hour for temporary engineer Shawn Sanders, effective January 1, 1991. f. Authorization for the sale of seven surplus Police Department pistols to• - Federally Licensed Firearms Dealers by sealed bid. g. Authorization for an expenditure of up to $8,000 for the purchase of three Mac LC computers to upgrade the Police Department's computer network. h. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-03, "RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NUMBER 67784, STATE PROJECT NO. 1902-43 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 13=194)," with respect to the Lilydale/Sylvandale Road storm sewer construction (Improvement No. 90, Project No. 2). Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated January 2, 1991 and attached hereto. k. Approval of the list of claims dated January 2, 1991 and totalling $717,489.51. . Acknowledgment of receipt of a Summons served on the City by Centex Real Estate Corporation. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from Police Chief Delmont informing Council that the Aetna Insurance Company and Mothers Against Drunk Driving have donated a video camera and accessories to the Police Department to enhance the department's efforts in DUI enforcement. Chief Delmont, present for the Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CAMERA DONATION Page No. 2994 January 2, 1991 c. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-01, "RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1991 CITY DEPOSITORIES OF FUNDS." d. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-02, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITIES FOR 1991." e. Authorization for a wage rate adjustment to $11.00 hour for temporary engineer Shawn Sanders, effective January 1, 1991. f. Authorization for the sale of seven surplus Police Department pistols to• - Federally Licensed Firearms Dealers by sealed bid. g. Authorization for an expenditure of up to $8,000 for the purchase of three Mac LC computers to upgrade the Police Department's computer network. h. Adoption of Resolution No. 91-03, "RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NUMBER 67784, STATE PROJECT NO. 1902-43 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 13=194)," with respect to the Lilydale/Sylvandale Road storm sewer construction (Improvement No. 90, Project No. 2). Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated January 2, 1991 and attached hereto. k. Approval of the list of claims dated January 2, 1991 and totalling $717,489.51. . Acknowledgment of receipt of a Summons served on the City by Centex Real Estate Corporation. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from Police Chief Delmont informing Council that the Aetna Insurance Company and Mothers Against Drunk Driving have donated a video camera and accessories to the Police Department to enhance the department's efforts in DUI enforcement. Chief Delmont, present for the Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ACTING MAYOR Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEALTH OFFICER Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2995 January 2, 1991 discussion, gave Council and the audience a background on why the City was given the camera and Accessories. He informed Council that the Department has made DUI enforcement its goal for the past two years. Additionally, the Mothers Against Drunk Driving uses the Council Chambers for monthly meetings and other programs. He stated that the camera has already been an effective tool in DUI enforcement. Councilmember Cummins moved to accept the video camera and accessories from Aetna Insurance and MADD and to express the City's gratitude for the support they are providing to the Police Department. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved that Councilmember Blesener be appointed to serve as Acting Mayor for 1991. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved that Dr. Thaddeus Chao be reappointed as the City Health Officer for 1991. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. The Council acknowledged letters from Lillie Suburban Newspapers (South-West Review) and Minnesota Suburban Publications (West St. Paul/Mendota Heights Sun) requesting designation as the City's official newspaper for 1991. Council also acknowledged a memo and recommendation from the City Clerk. Councilmember Cummins moved that the West St. Paul/Mendota Heights Sun Current be designated as the City's official newspaper for 1991. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from Administrator Lawell with respect to the need for the appointment of Councilmembers to fill vacancies on the NDC -4 and the Dakota County H.R.A. District No. 2 Review Committee, and a Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ACTING MAYOR Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 HEALTH OFFICER Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2995 January 2, 1991 discussion, gave Council and the audience a background on why the City was given the camera and Accessories. He informed Council that the Department has made DUI enforcement its goal for the past two years. Additionally, the Mothers Against Drunk Driving uses the Council Chambers for monthly meetings and other programs. He stated that the camera has already been an effective tool in DUI enforcement. Councilmember Cummins moved to accept the video camera and accessories from Aetna Insurance and MADD and to express the City's gratitude for the support they are providing to the Police Department. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved that Councilmember Blesener be appointed to serve as Acting Mayor for 1991. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener moved that Dr. Thaddeus Chao be reappointed as the City Health Officer for 1991. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. The Council acknowledged letters from Lillie Suburban Newspapers (South-West Review) and Minnesota Suburban Publications (West St. Paul/Mendota Heights Sun) requesting designation as the City's official newspaper for 1991. Council also acknowledged a memo and recommendation from the City Clerk. Councilmember Cummins moved that the West St. Paul/Mendota Heights Sun Current be designated as the City's official newspaper for 1991. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Council acknowledged and discussed a memo from Administrator Lawell with respect to the need for the appointment of Councilmembers to fill vacancies on the NDC -4 and the Dakota County H.R.A. District No. 2 Review Committee, and a Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ARCHITECT SELECTION MENDAKOTA PARK Page No. 2996 January 2, 1991 recommendation that Ron Rogoscheske be reappointed as the citizen representative to the NDC -4. Mayor Mertensotto nominated Councilmember Smith to serve as the Council representative on the NDC -4 Board and Councilmember Koch to serve as the Council representative on the H.R.A. committee. Councilmember Blesener moved to appoint Councilmember Smith as the Council representative on the NDC -4 Board and to reappoint Ron Rogoscheske as the citizeni representative to the NDC -4. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved to appoint Councilmember Koch to serve as the Council representative on the Dakota County H.R.A. District No. 2 Review Committee. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson and Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander regarding the selection of an architect for the design of public buildings in the Mendakota Park. It was noted that quotes were received from Neil Weber, of Schwartz/Weber Architects, and Keith Sjoquist, of Station 19 Architects. Mr. Danielson informed Council that Barton- Aschman Associates will design the general improvements to the park and that the quotes from Weber and Station 19 are for design of a two-level comfort station (at a budgeted cost of $75,000), a picnic shelter (at a budgeted cost of $22,000), and the schematic design for a future band shelter. Mayor Mertensotto asked if the low bidder, Station 19 Architects, is willing to enter into a fixed fee contract, committing the firm to designing facilities at the budgeted costs, re -designing the facilities if bids exceed the budgeted amounts. Councilmember Blesener felt that $22,000 is an excessive cost estimate for the picnic shelter. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 ARCHITECT SELECTION MENDAKOTA PARK Page No. 2996 January 2, 1991 recommendation that Ron Rogoscheske be reappointed as the citizen representative to the NDC -4. Mayor Mertensotto nominated Councilmember Smith to serve as the Council representative on the NDC -4 Board and Councilmember Koch to serve as the Council representative on the H.R.A. committee. Councilmember Blesener moved to appoint Councilmember Smith as the Council representative on the NDC -4 Board and to reappoint Ron Rogoscheske as the citizeni representative to the NDC -4. Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion. Councilmember Cummins moved to appoint Councilmember Koch to serve as the Council representative on the Dakota County H.R.A. District No. 2 Review Committee. Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson and Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander regarding the selection of an architect for the design of public buildings in the Mendakota Park. It was noted that quotes were received from Neil Weber, of Schwartz/Weber Architects, and Keith Sjoquist, of Station 19 Architects. Mr. Danielson informed Council that Barton- Aschman Associates will design the general improvements to the park and that the quotes from Weber and Station 19 are for design of a two-level comfort station (at a budgeted cost of $75,000), a picnic shelter (at a budgeted cost of $22,000), and the schematic design for a future band shelter. Mayor Mertensotto asked if the low bidder, Station 19 Architects, is willing to enter into a fixed fee contract, committing the firm to designing facilities at the budgeted costs, re -designing the facilities if bids exceed the budgeted amounts. Councilmember Blesener felt that $22,000 is an excessive cost estimate for the picnic shelter. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2997 January 2, 1991 Mr. Danielson responded that Station 19 is agreeable to the fixed fee clause. He stated that Barton-Aschman estimated the picnic shelter to cost $22,000. Councilmember Blesener moved that Station 19 Architects be selected to do the structural design work for a comfort station with a two- level observation deck and an approximately 500 square foot picnic shelter at the budgeted levels of funding of $75,000 and $22,000, and the schematic design for a future band shelter, for Mendakota Park, for the firm's low quote of $7,350, to direct staff to negotiate an acceptable contract for services with Station 19, and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreed upon contract. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener stated that she would like to be involved in the start-up stage of the program, before the architects begin schematic design, and that she felt someone from the Park Commission should also be involved. She suggested that the Station 19 architect appear at the next Park and Recreation Commission meeting. LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST Council acknowledged a reminder of the January 11th Dakota County legislative breakfast. Councilmembers Koch and Smith indicated that they would like to attend. COUNCIL COMMENTS Mayor Mertensotto directed staff to plan a half-day joint Council/Planning Commission /Park and Recreation Commission/Department Head workshop for February and to engage an outside facilitator for the workshop. He also suggested that Council and the City Administrator should plan a goal -setting session for some time in the spring. Staff was directed to again publicize the Planning Commission vacancy. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Blesener moved that Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2997 January 2, 1991 Mr. Danielson responded that Station 19 is agreeable to the fixed fee clause. He stated that Barton-Aschman estimated the picnic shelter to cost $22,000. Councilmember Blesener moved that Station 19 Architects be selected to do the structural design work for a comfort station with a two- level observation deck and an approximately 500 square foot picnic shelter at the budgeted levels of funding of $75,000 and $22,000, and the schematic design for a future band shelter, for Mendakota Park, for the firm's low quote of $7,350, to direct staff to negotiate an acceptable contract for services with Station 19, and to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreed upon contract. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Councilmember Blesener stated that she would like to be involved in the start-up stage of the program, before the architects begin schematic design, and that she felt someone from the Park Commission should also be involved. She suggested that the Station 19 architect appear at the next Park and Recreation Commission meeting. LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST Council acknowledged a reminder of the January 11th Dakota County legislative breakfast. Councilmembers Koch and Smith indicated that they would like to attend. COUNCIL COMMENTS Mayor Mertensotto directed staff to plan a half-day joint Council/Planning Commission /Park and Recreation Commission/Department Head workshop for February and to engage an outside facilitator for the workshop. He also suggested that Council and the City Administrator should plan a goal -setting session for some time in the spring. Staff was directed to again publicize the Planning Commission vacancy. ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Blesener moved that Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2998 January 2, 1991 the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 8:24 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Page No. 2998 January 2, 1991 the meeting be adjourned. Councilmember Smith seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 8:24 o'clock P.M. Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL January 3, 1991 Asphalt License Daily & Son Blacktopping, Inc. Masonry Licenses Arcade Concrete Const., Inc. Boettcher, Mike -Construction Bricks Unlimited Compton, Robert -Inc. Concrete Systems, Inc. Cook, H.W.-& Sons Dahn Builders Kelleher Construction Klatte, Peter -Brick & Stone Klund Construction Schlagel, Peter -Masonry Stanke Masonry & Const. Theisen -Fischer, Inc. Wayne Concrete Co., Inc. Excavating Licenses Bollig & Sons, Inc. Danner Landscaping Lakeside Plmb. & Htg., Inc. Le Roux Excavating, Inc. Mack's Excavating Rumpca Sewer & Water, Inc. Scherff, Inc. State Mechanical, Inc. Sun Excavating, Inc. United Water & Sewer Co. Weierke Trenching & Exc. Co. General Contractor Licenses Advance Construction Automatic Garage Door Co. Beartown Builders Befort Roofing, Inc. Bolander, Carl-& Sons Co. Brin-Northwestern Glass Co. Dahlstrom Designer Homes Dakota Fire Suppression EFH Company Falcon Fire Protection, Inc. Fireside Corner (The) LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL January 3, 1991 Asphalt License Daily & Son Blacktopping, Inc. Masonry Licenses Arcade Concrete Const., Inc. Boettcher, Mike -Construction Bricks Unlimited Compton, Robert -Inc. Concrete Systems, Inc. Cook, H.W.-& Sons Dahn Builders Kelleher Construction Klatte, Peter -Brick & Stone Klund Construction Schlagel, Peter -Masonry Stanke Masonry & Const. Theisen -Fischer, Inc. Wayne Concrete Co., Inc. Excavating Licenses Bollig & Sons, Inc. Danner Landscaping Lakeside Plmb. & Htg., Inc. Le Roux Excavating, Inc. Mack's Excavating Rumpca Sewer & Water, Inc. Scherff, Inc. State Mechanical, Inc. Sun Excavating, Inc. United Water & Sewer Co. Weierke Trenching & Exc. Co. General Contractor Licenses Advance Construction Automatic Garage Door Co. Beartown Builders Befort Roofing, Inc. Bolander, Carl-& Sons Co. Brin-Northwestern Glass Co. Dahlstrom Designer Homes Dakota Fire Suppression EFH Company Falcon Fire Protection, Inc. Fireside Corner (The) General Contractor Licenses Cont. Harvey Homes Independent Fire Protection, Inc. JA Development, Inc. K & P Drywall Knight & Sons Const. Co. Kraus -Anderson Const. Co. Lifestyle Homes, Inc. McPhillips Bros. Roofing Co. Mendota Heights Landscaping North American Framing, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Quality Exteriors, Inc. Rem -Con, Inc. Ryan Const. Co. St. Paul Linoleum & Carpet Co. Sapletal Construction Snelling Co. (The) Sorenson's Const. Co. of St. Paul, Inc. TJB Homes, Ltd. Twin City Fireplace Co. Woods Construction Zwinger, Charles -Inc. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses Air Comfort, Inc. Allan Mechanical, Inc. Arneson, Earl Jr. Benke Heating Binder, A.-& Son, Inc. Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc. Controlled Air, Inc., DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc. Egan & Sons Co. Fredrickson Htg. & A/C, Inc. Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co. Harris Mechanical Cont. Co. Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc. Riccar Htg. & A/C Ron's Mechanical, Inc. Sedgwick Htg. &- A/C Co. Valley Aire, Inc. Wenzel Htg. & A/C Gas Piping Licenses Air Comfort, Inc. Binder, A.-& Son, Inc. Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc. Controlled Air, Inc. DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc. Egan & Sons Co. Five Star Plumbing, Inc. Fredrickson Htg.•& A/C, Inc. Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co. General Contractor Licenses Cont. Harvey Homes Independent Fire Protection, Inc. JA Development, Inc. K & P Drywall Knight & Sons Const. Co. Kraus -Anderson Const. Co. Lifestyle Homes, Inc. McPhillips Bros. Roofing Co. Mendota Heights Landscaping North American Framing, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. Quality Exteriors, Inc. Rem -Con, Inc. Ryan Const. Co. St. Paul Linoleum & Carpet Co. Sapletal Construction Snelling Co. (The) Sorenson's Const. Co. of St. Paul, Inc. TJB Homes, Ltd. Twin City Fireplace Co. Woods Construction Zwinger, Charles -Inc. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses Air Comfort, Inc. Allan Mechanical, Inc. Arneson, Earl Jr. Benke Heating Binder, A.-& Son, Inc. Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc. Controlled Air, Inc., DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc. Egan & Sons Co. Fredrickson Htg. & A/C, Inc. Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co. Harris Mechanical Cont. Co. Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc. Riccar Htg. & A/C Ron's Mechanical, Inc. Sedgwick Htg. &- A/C Co. Valley Aire, Inc. Wenzel Htg. & A/C Gas Piping Licenses Air Comfort, Inc. Binder, A.-& Son, Inc. Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc. Controlled Air, Inc. DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc. Egan & Sons Co. Five Star Plumbing, Inc. Fredrickson Htg.•& A/C, Inc. Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co. Gas Piping Licenses Cont. Harris Mechanical Cont. Co. Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc. Riccar Heating Sedgwick Htg. & A/C Co. Valley Aire, Inc. Wenzel Htg. & A/C Plaster License Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. Sign Erecting License Suburban Lighting, Inc. Cigarette Licenses D.V.M., Inc. Employee Party Fund Fina Serve, Inc. Par 3 Golf, Inc. SOS Convenient Mart, Inc. Snyder's Drug Store #42 Somerset Country Club Tom Thumb Rubbish Hauler Licenses AA Rubbish Service, Inc. Action Disposal Krupenny & Sons Disposal Svc. Triangle Rubbish Service Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. Gas Piping Licenses Cont. Harris Mechanical Cont. Co. Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc. Riccar Heating Sedgwick Htg. & A/C Co. Valley Aire, Inc. Wenzel Htg. & A/C Plaster License Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc. Sign Erecting License Suburban Lighting, Inc. Cigarette Licenses D.V.M., Inc. Employee Party Fund Fina Serve, Inc. Par 3 Golf, Inc. SOS Convenient Mart, Inc. Snyder's Drug Store #42 Somerset Country Club Tom Thumb Rubbish Hauler Licenses AA Rubbish Service, Inc. Action Disposal Krupenny & Sons Disposal Svc. Triangle Rubbish Service Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, DECEMBER, 1990 BALANCE DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account 5% Savings Account 5 1/2% C.D. Rep. 6.15% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 3/1/91 @ 7.10% Savings Cert. 2/28/91 @ 7.2% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. $ <2,937.67> 516.75 360,000.00 $ 357,579.08 $1,092,581.00 $ 100,000.00 350,000.00 13,952.59 363,952.59 800,000.00 100,000.00 U.S. Treasury 8 5/8% 5-15-93 Notes $ 498,671.88 FNB Acceptance $1,000,000 2/1/91 8.21%$ 986,508.00 GNMA Mtg. Pool 9% $ 278,147.10 COLLATERAL $1,192,581.00 $ 900,000.00 Value 12-31-90 (est.) U.S. Treasury Money Mkt 2,507,861.79 (2,968,000.00) Gov't. Securities Fund 1,200,000.00 (1,762,000.00) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $6,192,720.44 Funds Available 12/31/89: 6,026,184.56 Rates Money Market Dec. 30 Bank 6.15% Fid 7.78% Escrow Funds (American National Bank) 11-30-90 City Hall Buildings $ 25,190.64 Railroad Crossing $159,181.14 TOTAL $181,963.40 LES:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, DECEMBER, 1990 BALANCE DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK Checking Account 5% Savings Account 5 1/2% C.D. Rep. 6.15% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. CHEROKEE STATE BANK C.D. due 3/1/91 @ 7.10% Savings Cert. 2/28/91 @ 7.2% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. $ <2,937.67> 516.75 360,000.00 $ 357,579.08 $1,092,581.00 $ 100,000.00 350,000.00 13,952.59 363,952.59 800,000.00 100,000.00 U.S. Treasury 8 5/8% 5-15-93 Notes $ 498,671.88 FNB Acceptance $1,000,000 2/1/91 8.21%$ 986,508.00 GNMA Mtg. Pool 9% $ 278,147.10 COLLATERAL $1,192,581.00 $ 900,000.00 Value 12-31-90 (est.) U.S. Treasury Money Mkt 2,507,861.79 (2,968,000.00) Gov't. Securities Fund 1,200,000.00 (1,762,000.00) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE: $6,192,720.44 Funds Available 12/31/89: 6,026,184.56 Rates Money Market Dec. 30 Bank 6.15% Fid 7.78% Escrow Funds (American National Bank) 11-30-90 City Hall Buildings $ 25,190.64 Railroad Crossing $159,181.14 TOTAL $181,963.40 LES:kkb rwi , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admini FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Water Rate Increase INFORMATION January 9, 1991 The St. Paul Water Utility has notified us of new water rates which became effective on January lst. The rate schedule and letter from St. Paul Water are attached. The water consumption charge for Mendota Heights homes and businesses ("Outside City" table) has been increased by $0.07 per 100 cubic feet for each of the three consumption levels. As an example, the rate for the first 50,000 cubic feet per month rose from $1.08/ccf.to $1.15/ccf. There was no increase in demand charge. The last increase in water rates occurred on January 1, 1989. ACTION REOUIRED t The City of Mendota Heights contracts water from St. Paul and has no control over rate increases. The notice of rate increase is for information only. No action is required. rwi , CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Admini FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Water Rate Increase INFORMATION January 9, 1991 The St. Paul Water Utility has notified us of new water rates which became effective on January lst. The rate schedule and letter from St. Paul Water are attached. The water consumption charge for Mendota Heights homes and businesses ("Outside City" table) has been increased by $0.07 per 100 cubic feet for each of the three consumption levels. As an example, the rate for the first 50,000 cubic feet per month rose from $1.08/ccf.to $1.15/ccf. There was no increase in demand charge. The last increase in water rates occurred on January 1, 1989. ACTION REOUIRED t The City of Mendota Heights contracts water from St. Paul and has no control over rate increases. The notice of rate increase is for information only. No action is required. '•'': THOMAS D. MOGREN +� General Manager f ;si!dJr 3, VERNE E.JACOBSEN Aieis{ant General Manager 4'{*" : ' 1.41 • 1 LA I Y ur JAM i rmuL., 1VIIP4P1GJV IH BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS r� .,:' ROGER•J-GOSWIT-Z; PRESIDENT "°� ':'' ;ei .';:'-_"�?'''' DEBORAH�YBsztuACHRACH,<KICE PRESIDENT = V''<„ :; nr�. e `4404, , TG`s ..v '� 4 j DAy1D'THUNE ER' t ANICE RE1TMA w .w,S:, -irr,r*" `a.. sr�r.�.RAYI1AONb. YL MISSISSIPPI RIVER =___'.moi= BERNIE R. BULLERT Supt. of Water Distribution ROGER A. MOHROR Water Production Engine€ 2-` • TREATMENTEIN January 3, 1991 The Honorable Charles Mertensotto Mayor, City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mayor Mertensotto: Re: Increase in Water Rates Due to increased operational costs of the Water Utility, the Board of Water Commissioners and the Saint Paul City Council have adopted a revised schedule of water rates which will be in effect for all billings rendered on or after January 1, 1991. For your information, the last water rate increase occurred in 1988. A copy of the new water rate schedule is attached. If there are any questions regarding this information, please let me know. TDM/lc Attachment Yours very truly, 3M% Z Thomas D. Mogren General Manager cc: Tom Lawell, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights Kathy Swanson, City Clerk City of Mendota Heights 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 'A;:,c DISTRIBUTION__ '•'': THOMAS D. MOGREN +� General Manager f ;si!dJr 3, VERNE E.JACOBSEN Aieis{ant General Manager 4'{*" : ' 1.41 • 1 LA I Y ur JAM i rmuL., 1VIIP4P1GJV IH BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS r� .,:' ROGER•J-GOSWIT-Z; PRESIDENT "°� ':'' ;ei .';:'-_"�?'''' DEBORAH�YBsztuACHRACH,<KICE PRESIDENT = V''<„ :; nr�. e `4404, , TG`s ..v '� 4 j DAy1D'THUNE ER' t ANICE RE1TMA w .w,S:, -irr,r*" `a.. sr�r.�.RAYI1AONb. YL MISSISSIPPI RIVER =___'.moi= BERNIE R. BULLERT Supt. of Water Distribution ROGER A. MOHROR Water Production Engine€ 2-` • TREATMENTEIN January 3, 1991 The Honorable Charles Mertensotto Mayor, City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mayor Mertensotto: Re: Increase in Water Rates Due to increased operational costs of the Water Utility, the Board of Water Commissioners and the Saint Paul City Council have adopted a revised schedule of water rates which will be in effect for all billings rendered on or after January 1, 1991. For your information, the last water rate increase occurred in 1988. A copy of the new water rate schedule is attached. If there are any questions regarding this information, please let me know. TDM/lc Attachment Yours very truly, 3M% Z Thomas D. Mogren General Manager cc: Tom Lawell, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights Kathy Swanson, City Clerk City of Mendota Heights 4TH FLOOR CITY HALL ANNEX - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 'A;:,c DISTRIBUTION__ WATER UTILITY - CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA WATER RATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 199I CONSUMPTION CHARGE Inside City Outside City For first 50,000 cu, ft, per month 96Q per 180 cu. ft. . . . $1.15 Next 450,000 cu. ft. per month 94Q per 100 cu. ft. . . . 81,13 All over 500,000 cu. ft. per month 92Q per 100 cu. ft. . . . $1,10 DEMAND CHARGE Inside City Outside City . 3/4" meter, and smaller $ 3.20 per quarter . $ 3.84 per quarter 1" meter 6.05 " '/ , 7.26 "' ' �«/ meter 10.50 '/ '' . l2.6O " ,tPI meter 5.40 per- month . 6.48 per month 2" meter 3" meter 4" meter 6" meter 8" meter 10" meter l2" meter 10.10 " it 12,I2 " 27.50 " " 33.00 " `/ 46.50 " x 55.80 " " 94,70 " « 1I3`64 o '` I72.40 `` " 206.88 « x 275.00 " 330,00 " " 379.50 " '/ 455.40 " WATER UTILITY - CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA WATER RATES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 199I CONSUMPTION CHARGE Inside City Outside City For first 50,000 cu, ft, per month 96Q per 180 cu. ft. . . . $1.15 Next 450,000 cu. ft. per month 94Q per 100 cu. ft. . . . 81,13 All over 500,000 cu. ft. per month 92Q per 100 cu. ft. . . . $1,10 DEMAND CHARGE Inside City Outside City . 3/4" meter, and smaller $ 3.20 per quarter . $ 3.84 per quarter 1" meter 6.05 " '/ , 7.26 "' ' �«/ meter 10.50 '/ '' . l2.6O " ,tPI meter 5.40 per- month . 6.48 per month 2" meter 3" meter 4" meter 6" meter 8" meter 10" meter l2" meter 10.10 " it 12,I2 " 27.50 " " 33.00 " `/ 46.50 " x 55.80 " " 94,70 " « 1I3`64 o '` I72.40 `` " 206.88 « x 275.00 " 330,00 " " 379.50 " '/ 455.40 " CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Adminis FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Facsimile Machine Quotes INTRODUCTION January 4, 1991 The 1991 Administration Department budget provides for the purchase of a facsimile machine. The purpose of this memo is to request authority to solicit quotes and issue a purchase order for a plain paper fax. DISCUSSION All City departments housed at City Hall currently share the use of the Police Department facsimile, which was purchased in 1989. The machine is used regularly to transmit and receive information from the City Attorney, City Planner, contractors and other governmental agencies, and over the past year has proven to be a very effective, if not indispensable, communications tool. Several communications are made to and from Administration, Engineering and Code Enforcement staff members each day. Purchase of a fax for the shared use of these departments at this time should be cost effective and increase productivity. Facsimile machine technology has changed considerably since 1989. At that time, the roll -paper technology was standard and considerably less expensive than plain paper machines. The quality of the faxed document is, however, minimal as compared to the plain paper ink -jet and laserjet machines currently available. Additionally, plain paper is considerably less expensive than roll paper. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Council authorize staff to solicit quotes and issue a purchase order for a plain paper fax machine, at a cost not to exceed $2,500. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to authorize the solicitation of quotes and issuance of a purchase order for a plain paper facsimile machine to be used by the Administration, Engineering and Code Enforcement Departments, at a cost not to exceed $2,500. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Adminis FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Facsimile Machine Quotes INTRODUCTION January 4, 1991 The 1991 Administration Department budget provides for the purchase of a facsimile machine. The purpose of this memo is to request authority to solicit quotes and issue a purchase order for a plain paper fax. DISCUSSION All City departments housed at City Hall currently share the use of the Police Department facsimile, which was purchased in 1989. The machine is used regularly to transmit and receive information from the City Attorney, City Planner, contractors and other governmental agencies, and over the past year has proven to be a very effective, if not indispensable, communications tool. Several communications are made to and from Administration, Engineering and Code Enforcement staff members each day. Purchase of a fax for the shared use of these departments at this time should be cost effective and increase productivity. Facsimile machine technology has changed considerably since 1989. At that time, the roll -paper technology was standard and considerably less expensive than plain paper machines. The quality of the faxed document is, however, minimal as compared to the plain paper ink -jet and laserjet machines currently available. Additionally, plain paper is considerably less expensive than roll paper. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Council authorize staff to solicit quotes and issue a purchase order for a plain paper fax machine, at a cost not to exceed $2,500. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to authorize the solicitation of quotes and issuance of a purchase order for a plain paper facsimile machine to be used by the Administration, Engineering and Code Enforcement Departments, at a cost not to exceed $2,500. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. D. ie January 9, 1991 and Guy Kullander Public Wo ks Dor Parks Project Manager SUBJECT: Barton -Asch 4 Professional Services Contract DISCUSSION: The City has a professional service contract with Barton-Aschman Association (BA) to design certain aspects of the park improvements resulting from the 1989 Park Bond Referendum. Within that contract B.A. had "not to exceed" figures for designing three new active parks. The original B.A. contract anticipated a total construction project amount for Mendakota Park at $346,000 and allocated a "not to exceed" a figure of $21,100 (approximately 7% of the construction costs, see attached letter dated, December 29, 1990). The current estimated construction amount for the B.A. design portion of the Mendakota Park is around $550,000. B.A. has requested an increase in their contract to accommodate the additional work now anticipated (see attached letter dated January 2, 1991). B.A. originally requested that a new 7% of construction costs design fee be established (this would be approximately $38,500). Staff feels confident that the actual design costs on a time and mate- rials basis will be significantly less than the $38,500. We do feel that the design costs for the expanded park design will exceed the current "not to exceed" figure of $21,100 and that B.A. is entitled to an increase in their fee. We therefore suggest that their contract be amended to a "time and materials basis". Guy will monitor their costs as they are billed on a monthly basis to insure that they are kept to a minimum (design for Sibley was approximately $20,000). RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that Council authorize B.A. to increase their con- tract to allow for necessary additional work as a result of the ex- panded program. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should .•_ pass a motion authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached contractor's amendment (letter dated January 2, 1991). JED: dfw CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: James E. D. ie January 9, 1991 and Guy Kullander Public Wo ks Dor Parks Project Manager SUBJECT: Barton -Asch 4 Professional Services Contract DISCUSSION: The City has a professional service contract with Barton-Aschman Association (BA) to design certain aspects of the park improvements resulting from the 1989 Park Bond Referendum. Within that contract B.A. had "not to exceed" figures for designing three new active parks. The original B.A. contract anticipated a total construction project amount for Mendakota Park at $346,000 and allocated a "not to exceed" a figure of $21,100 (approximately 7% of the construction costs, see attached letter dated, December 29, 1990). The current estimated construction amount for the B.A. design portion of the Mendakota Park is around $550,000. B.A. has requested an increase in their contract to accommodate the additional work now anticipated (see attached letter dated January 2, 1991). B.A. originally requested that a new 7% of construction costs design fee be established (this would be approximately $38,500). Staff feels confident that the actual design costs on a time and mate- rials basis will be significantly less than the $38,500. We do feel that the design costs for the expanded park design will exceed the current "not to exceed" figure of $21,100 and that B.A. is entitled to an increase in their fee. We therefore suggest that their contract be amended to a "time and materials basis". Guy will monitor their costs as they are billed on a monthly basis to insure that they are kept to a minimum (design for Sibley was approximately $20,000). RECOMMENDATION: We recommend that Council authorize B.A. to increase their con- tract to allow for necessary additional work as a result of the ex- panded program. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should .•_ pass a motion authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached contractor's amendment (letter dated January 2, 1991). JED: dfw Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 USA January 2, 1991 Mr. Jim Danielson Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Mendakota Park Design Dear Mr. Danielson: Phone: (612) 332-0421 Fax: (612) 332-6180 On January 2, 1991 we discussed by phone the additional consultant services which are necessary to complete plans and specifications for Mendakota Park. These additional services are required due to the expanded park project currently envisioned by the community. Our current contract to design the project is part of an overall park planning and design services agreement of November 7, 1989. Design services for the entire contract were stipulated at $70,800 based upon park improvements of $992,410. The contract's Attachment A - Consultant Responsibilities and Preliminary Project Costs identifies Mendakota Neighborhood Park improvements at approximately $44,000 and the active play facility (Mendakota Estates Park) at $302,500. Total project value, therefore, was estimated at $346,500. The Mendakota preliminary construction budget has increased due to additions in the project's development program. Preliminary cost estimates consistent with the revised development program have ranged from approximately $715,000 to $785,000. We understand that the City Council desires several alternate bids to help the city tailor. the exact elements which are to be accepted for construction. It is our understanding that Barton-Aschman will complete plans and specifications for all park elements with the exception of related buildings such as the concessions/restroom building or bandshell if one is to be completed. Based upon our conversation completed today, it is agreed that Barton-Aschman will be compensated based upon the actual staff time and expenses needed to complete the specified tasks. Assistance to the city during bidding and periodic construction observation will be completed as requested by city staff. Barton-Aschman will bill the city on a regular basis similar to that work which has recently been completed. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 USA January 2, 1991 Mr. Jim Danielson Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Mendakota Park Design Dear Mr. Danielson: Phone: (612) 332-0421 Fax: (612) 332-6180 On January 2, 1991 we discussed by phone the additional consultant services which are necessary to complete plans and specifications for Mendakota Park. These additional services are required due to the expanded park project currently envisioned by the community. Our current contract to design the project is part of an overall park planning and design services agreement of November 7, 1989. Design services for the entire contract were stipulated at $70,800 based upon park improvements of $992,410. The contract's Attachment A - Consultant Responsibilities and Preliminary Project Costs identifies Mendakota Neighborhood Park improvements at approximately $44,000 and the active play facility (Mendakota Estates Park) at $302,500. Total project value, therefore, was estimated at $346,500. The Mendakota preliminary construction budget has increased due to additions in the project's development program. Preliminary cost estimates consistent with the revised development program have ranged from approximately $715,000 to $785,000. We understand that the City Council desires several alternate bids to help the city tailor. the exact elements which are to be accepted for construction. It is our understanding that Barton-Aschman will complete plans and specifications for all park elements with the exception of related buildings such as the concessions/restroom building or bandshell if one is to be completed. Based upon our conversation completed today, it is agreed that Barton-Aschman will be compensated based upon the actual staff time and expenses needed to complete the specified tasks. Assistance to the city during bidding and periodic construction observation will be completed as requested by city staff. Barton-Aschman will bill the city on a regular basis similar to that work which has recently been completed. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. January 2, 1991 Page 2 Please sign and return one copy of this letter agreement if the information contained within provides a fair representation of our phone conversation. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you and your staff and look forward to completing this exceptional project. • Sincerely, BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ikAW41—. Barry\.J. Warner, ASLA, AICP Principal Associate and Its Contracting Officer Authorized to Execute Agreement for: BJW:amm ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY: (Signature) (Typed Name) (Date) Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. January 2, 1991 Page 2 Please sign and return one copy of this letter agreement if the information contained within provides a fair representation of our phone conversation. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you and your staff and look forward to completing this exceptional project. • Sincerely, BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ikAW41—. Barry\.J. Warner, ASLA, AICP Principal Associate and Its Contracting Officer Authorized to Execute Agreement for: BJW:amm ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY: (Signature) (Typed Name) (Date) Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 USA December 20, 1990 Mr. Jim Danielson Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Mendakota Park Design Dear Mr. Danielson: Phone: (612) 332-0421 Fax: (612) 332-6180 Guy Kullander notified us that the city council approved the Mendakota Park project at their Tuesday, December 18 meeting, approved the Mendakota Park project and had authorized the preparation of plans and specifications. This facility will be an exceptional one, and we look forward to assisting in its construction. Our contract to design the project is part of an overall park planning and design services agreement of November 7, 1989. Design fees for the entire contract were stipulated at $70,800 based upon park improvements of $992,410 which calculates to a seven percent design fee. Attachment A --Consultant Responsibilities and Preliminary Project Costs identifies Mendakota's neighborhood park improvements as approximately $44,000 and active play facilities (Mendakota Estates Park) at $302,500. Total project value, therefore, was estimated at $346,500. As you are aware, the Mendakota Park preliminary construction budget has escalated due to changes in design program. We understand that the city council desires several alternate bids to be considered to help the city tailor the exact elements which are to accepted for construction. It is also our understanding that Barton-Aschman will complete plans and specifications for all park elements with the exception of the concessions/rest room building and band shell, if one is to be completed. We request that additional compensation be made available to complete the increased design assignment. We suggest that the seven percent design fee, which our existing contract is based upon, be applied to the Mendakota Park facilities which are bid as base and alternate items. This approach provides a straightforward method of determining consultant compensation based upon design work completed. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 111 Third Avenue South, Suite 350 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 USA December 20, 1990 Mr. Jim Danielson Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: Mendakota Park Design Dear Mr. Danielson: Phone: (612) 332-0421 Fax: (612) 332-6180 Guy Kullander notified us that the city council approved the Mendakota Park project at their Tuesday, December 18 meeting, approved the Mendakota Park project and had authorized the preparation of plans and specifications. This facility will be an exceptional one, and we look forward to assisting in its construction. Our contract to design the project is part of an overall park planning and design services agreement of November 7, 1989. Design fees for the entire contract were stipulated at $70,800 based upon park improvements of $992,410 which calculates to a seven percent design fee. Attachment A --Consultant Responsibilities and Preliminary Project Costs identifies Mendakota's neighborhood park improvements as approximately $44,000 and active play facilities (Mendakota Estates Park) at $302,500. Total project value, therefore, was estimated at $346,500. As you are aware, the Mendakota Park preliminary construction budget has escalated due to changes in design program. We understand that the city council desires several alternate bids to be considered to help the city tailor the exact elements which are to accepted for construction. It is also our understanding that Barton-Aschman will complete plans and specifications for all park elements with the exception of the concessions/rest room building and band shell, if one is to be completed. We request that additional compensation be made available to complete the increased design assignment. We suggest that the seven percent design fee, which our existing contract is based upon, be applied to the Mendakota Park facilities which are bid as base and alternate items. This approach provides a straightforward method of determining consultant compensation based upon design work completed. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. December 20, 1990 Page 2 We are committed to meeting the project's time frame and bidding date. Please sign and return one copy of this letter to serve as a contract amendment. Sincerely, BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY: Barry J. Warner, ASLA, AICP Principal Associate (Signature) Authorized to Execute Agreement for: (Typed Name) (Date) BJW:kro cc: Guy Kullander, City of Mendota Heights Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. December 20, 1990 Page 2 We are committed to meeting the project's time frame and bidding date. Please sign and return one copy of this letter to serve as a contract amendment. Sincerely, BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY: Barry J. Warner, ASLA, AICP Principal Associate (Signature) Authorized to Execute Agreement for: (Typed Name) (Date) BJW:kro cc: Guy Kullander, City of Mendota Heights CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Letter of Appreciation - Dr. Thaddeus Chao January 10, 1991 DISCUSSION As you may recall at the Council's last meeting, action was taken to appoint Dr. Thaddeus Chao as the City's Health Officer for 1991. Dr. Chao has served in this capacity for over thirty years. Earlier this week staff learned that Dr. Chao is soon to retire from his work at the Department of Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, and in recognition of his long and fruitful career and ongoing service to Mendota Heights, a brief Letter of Appreciation is attached for your consideration. Former City Mayor Bob Lockwood has been invited to a retirement dinner being held in honor of Dr. Chao on February 2, 1991. He has volunteered to present the Appreciation Letter to Dr. Chao on behalf of the City at that event, should the Council so desire. ACTION REOUIRED Should the Council wish to provide recognition to Dr. Chao upon the occasion of his retirement, the attached Letter of Appreciation should be adopted for presentation and delivery to Dr. Chao by former Mayor Lockwood on February 2, 1991. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Letter of Appreciation - Dr. Thaddeus Chao January 10, 1991 DISCUSSION As you may recall at the Council's last meeting, action was taken to appoint Dr. Thaddeus Chao as the City's Health Officer for 1991. Dr. Chao has served in this capacity for over thirty years. Earlier this week staff learned that Dr. Chao is soon to retire from his work at the Department of Veteran's Affairs Medical Center, and in recognition of his long and fruitful career and ongoing service to Mendota Heights, a brief Letter of Appreciation is attached for your consideration. Former City Mayor Bob Lockwood has been invited to a retirement dinner being held in honor of Dr. Chao on February 2, 1991. He has volunteered to present the Appreciation Letter to Dr. Chao on behalf of the City at that event, should the Council so desire. ACTION REOUIRED Should the Council wish to provide recognition to Dr. Chao upon the occasion of his retirement, the attached Letter of Appreciation should be adopted for presentation and delivery to Dr. Chao by former Mayor Lockwood on February 2, 1991. MTL:kkb � City of Mendota Heights January 10, 1991 Dr. Thaddeus Chao 783 Hokah Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Ted: With great pleasure and on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights, I join with your many friends and colleagues in congratulating you upon the occasion of your retirement from the Veteran's Medical Center. Your many years of service and accomplishment are commendable and worthy of praise. Your fine career and your service as the Health Officer of the City of Mendota Heights for over thirty years, are examples of your professional and volunteer dedication to public service and to the field of public health. Thanks for all you have done for Minnesota's Veterans and our community in the past. Of course the City Council is pleased to learn that you have agreed to continue your volunteer service to the City of Mendota Heights as our Health Officer for 1991. Please accept our best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Sincerely, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor CEM:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850 � City of Mendota Heights January 10, 1991 Dr. Thaddeus Chao 783 Hokah Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Ted: With great pleasure and on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights, I join with your many friends and colleagues in congratulating you upon the occasion of your retirement from the Veteran's Medical Center. Your many years of service and accomplishment are commendable and worthy of praise. Your fine career and your service as the Health Officer of the City of Mendota Heights for over thirty years, are examples of your professional and volunteer dedication to public service and to the field of public health. Thanks for all you have done for Minnesota's Veterans and our community in the past. Of course the City Council is pleased to learn that you have agreed to continue your volunteer service to the City of Mendota Heights as our Health Officer for 1991. Please accept our best wishes for a long and happy retirement. Sincerely, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor CEM:kkb 1101 Victoria Curve •Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850 LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL January 15, 1991 Asphalt Licenses J & W Asphalt Const., Inc. Pine Bend Paving, Inc. Masonry Licenses Andretta Brothers Dakota Rhoads Masonry, Inc. Elko Construction F & B Const., Inc. Gresser Concrete Greystone Masonry, Inc. Jesco, Inc. Johnny Masonry, Inc. M.W. Concrete & Masonry Co., Inc. Prestige Concrete RJS Concrete Serice Const., Inc. Excavating Licenses Barsness Const. & Exc. Carlson Sewer Co., Inc. Commercial Utilities, Inc. Dahn, S.J.-Trucking & Exc., Inc. Dakota Plumbing & Htg., Inc. Dasen Cont. Co., Inc. Kamish, A.-& Sons, Inc. Imperial Developers Richfield Plumb. Co. General ContractorLicenses Alside Builders American Remodeling, Inc. Anderson, Mary -Homes Automatic Sprinkler Bauer, W.F.-Construction Centex Homes Crowley Co., Inc. Cudd, Charles -Corp. Daak Const. Determan Welding & Tank Svc., Inc. Enebak Const. Co. Garlock -French Roofing Corp. Gilbert Mechanical Cont., Inc. Girard, Monty -Homes LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL January 15, 1991 Asphalt Licenses J & W Asphalt Const., Inc. Pine Bend Paving, Inc. Masonry Licenses Andretta Brothers Dakota Rhoads Masonry, Inc. Elko Construction F & B Const., Inc. Gresser Concrete Greystone Masonry, Inc. Jesco, Inc. Johnny Masonry, Inc. M.W. Concrete & Masonry Co., Inc. Prestige Concrete RJS Concrete Serice Const., Inc. Excavating Licenses Barsness Const. & Exc. Carlson Sewer Co., Inc. Commercial Utilities, Inc. Dahn, S.J.-Trucking & Exc., Inc. Dakota Plumbing & Htg., Inc. Dasen Cont. Co., Inc. Kamish, A.-& Sons, Inc. Imperial Developers Richfield Plumb. Co. General ContractorLicenses Alside Builders American Remodeling, Inc. Anderson, Mary -Homes Automatic Sprinkler Bauer, W.F.-Construction Centex Homes Crowley Co., Inc. Cudd, Charles -Corp. Daak Const. Determan Welding & Tank Svc., Inc. Enebak Const. Co. Garlock -French Roofing Corp. Gilbert Mechanical Cont., Inc. Girard, Monty -Homes General Cont. Licenses Cont. Grinnell Corp. Heat-N-Glo Fireplace Products, Inc. Heaver Design & Const. Heinen, Nick -Const., Inc. Hercules Home Insulation Industrial Sprinkler Corp. JHL Construction JR Construction, Inc. Johnson Beck Const. Co. K & N Const., Inc. McGough Const. Co., Inc. Metro Seamless Gutters Midwest Fireplace Co. Nelson, Mike -Masonry Ozmun-Pederson, Inc. Peterson Huber Corp. Phillips Klein Co., Inc. Platte Valley Const., Inc. Rainbow, Inc. Westurn Cedar Supply Western States Fire Prot. Co. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses Apollo Htg. & Vent. Corp. Aspen Htg. & A/C Gopher Htg. & Sheet Metal, Inc. Krinkie Htg. & A/C Key Metalcraft, Inc. Red Wing Htg. & A/C, Inc. Vogt, Fred-& Co. Welter, Ray N.-Htg. Co. Gas Piping Licenses Apollo Htg. & Vent. Corp. Dakota Plmb. & Htg., Inc. Key Metalcraft, Inc. McQuillan Bros. Plmb. & Htg. Co. Northern Air Corp. Thompson Plmb. Vogt, Fred-& Co. Plaster Licenses Berg Drywall, Inc. Housley Const., Inc. Cigarette License Mendakota Country Club Rubbish Hauler Licenses Knutson Rubbish Service Mendota Heights Rubbish Oehrlein, Ken -Sanitation Svc. Tree Removal License S & S Tree Spec. , Inc. General Cont. Licenses Cont. Grinnell Corp. Heat-N-Glo Fireplace Products, Inc. Heaver Design & Const. Heinen, Nick -Const., Inc. Hercules Home Insulation Industrial Sprinkler Corp. JHL Construction JR Construction, Inc. Johnson Beck Const. Co. K & N Const., Inc. McGough Const. Co., Inc. Metro Seamless Gutters Midwest Fireplace Co. Nelson, Mike -Masonry Ozmun-Pederson, Inc. Peterson Huber Corp. Phillips Klein Co., Inc. Platte Valley Const., Inc. Rainbow, Inc. Westurn Cedar Supply Western States Fire Prot. Co. Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses Apollo Htg. & Vent. Corp. Aspen Htg. & A/C Gopher Htg. & Sheet Metal, Inc. Krinkie Htg. & A/C Key Metalcraft, Inc. Red Wing Htg. & A/C, Inc. Vogt, Fred-& Co. Welter, Ray N.-Htg. Co. Gas Piping Licenses Apollo Htg. & Vent. Corp. Dakota Plmb. & Htg., Inc. Key Metalcraft, Inc. McQuillan Bros. Plmb. & Htg. Co. Northern Air Corp. Thompson Plmb. Vogt, Fred-& Co. Plaster Licenses Berg Drywall, Inc. Housley Const., Inc. Cigarette License Mendakota Country Club Rubbish Hauler Licenses Knutson Rubbish Service Mendota Heights Rubbish Oehrlein, Ken -Sanitation Svc. Tree Removal License S & S Tree Spec. , Inc. January 15, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Total Claims Significant Claims Bond payments American National 85,493 1st Trust 426,006 Norwest71,411 .MWCC Dec sac 3,564 Tripp On gas 3,268 Unusual Claims Barr Engr Storm water swr plan 2,211 Custom Fire 1990 repairs 5,230 Davies Water Hydrant conversion 10,036 960,257 January 15, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Total Claims Significant Claims Bond payments American National 85,493 1st Trust 426,006 Norwest71,411 .MWCC Dec sac 3,564 Tripp On gas 3,268 Unusual Claims Barr Engr Storm water swr plan 2,211 Custom Fire 1990 repairs 5,230 Davies Water Hydrant conversion 10,036 960,257 12 Jan 1951 Fr! 8037 AM Temp Check Number Dept 70- Ar7m _Dept 5O-RU&Bri.dgP r• Claims Llst 15-Engr 60 -Utilities Rage' 1 i'' 1/15/91 C1ty of Mendota Heights 20 -Police 70 -Parks 30 -Fire 80 -Planning 1 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling +' 90 -Animal -Control - - - - - -- 75-1 Temp. I 2 Check .3I -umber- endor= s+•NemAccount Code Comments._ __Amount_ 1! 16 I. 2 American Nat tonal Bank ;23 -446 -030 -ere, 73 bds 3, eze, ;"3 r"..scan-Nat.2onai-batik__-_---_-4,^_-4436-330- 88-bds 50,037._50-,0 { ,? 83, 453. 73 '11' 2' L2 i 10 r'� 14: 12 1' 61 1371 s pl ys 3''5- 27 11131 , - 3j 14 091 15 35-02 _4z�7a ,1 8 'tot -as -s -Temp -Check Number Temp Check Numb67,r 8 S J Auto supply' e2-4330-430-30 16 n 18 19 ( 20 21 22 G23 24 Totals Temp Check Number amp -Check -Number 3 3 9arr Engineering Co 28-028 Re local wtr plan e,e11.3J 3 Totals Temp Check Number 25 26 27 28 ( ' 29 30 Temp Check Number 4 1 31 32 33 4 Bl.ffm 4nr- 122, 4 i2:., f2G '23! e, X11.35 '` 3 X31 001-4200n510=70 Jan_ -rent 1-98.00 ;• l 158.00 1n' Totals Temp Check_JVumber-•_-- _----- -_-._.4 Temp Check Number 3 34 35 36 3 Board of Water Commissioners 08-44en-0.0-00 3 Board of Water Commissioners 02 -441_'3-323-30 37 38 39 10 Totals Temp Check Number 3 40 41 421 43 ( 44 45 46 ,47 48 Temp Cneck Number 6 Ez_srofftn_itd___- - O1 -eel &t E Totais._Temp_Check_Nun7ber Temp Check Number 7 7 8l ack Hl l l s Ammo 52 Totals Temp Cneck Number 7 mp_ beCk_Number-------- 8- — — 8 Col 2 l rrs l=l ectrl cal 'Const 2Z-0010 7 Lto {t1, io37`n annl fire sply 80.00 annl fire splys 80.00 130.00 _ sort:Ware -_--" •-. 436.26 $t1 -430-t2 ei'•-e0 ammo rprs 436.16 139.Z0 239. 30 400. 0t8 12 Jan 1951 Fr! 8037 AM Temp Check Number Dept 70- Ar7m _Dept 5O-RU&Bri.dgP r• Claims Llst 15-Engr 60 -Utilities Rage' 1 i'' 1/15/91 C1ty of Mendota Heights 20 -Police 70 -Parks 30 -Fire 80 -Planning 1 40 -CEO 85 -Recycling +' 90 -Animal -Control - - - - - -- 75-1 Temp. I 2 Check .3I -umber- endor= s+•NemAccount Code Comments._ __Amount_ 1! 16 I. 2 American Nat tonal Bank ;23 -446 -030 -ere, 73 bds 3, eze, ;"3 r"..scan-Nat.2onai-batik__-_---_-4,^_-4436-330- 88-bds 50,037._50-,0 { ,? 83, 453. 73 '11' 2' L2 i 10 r'� 14: 12 1' 61 1371 s pl ys 3''5- 27 11131 , - 3j 14 091 15 35-02 _4z�7a ,1 8 'tot -as -s -Temp -Check Number Temp Check Numb67,r 8 S J Auto supply' e2-4330-430-30 16 n 18 19 ( 20 21 22 G23 24 Totals Temp Check Number amp -Check -Number 3 3 9arr Engineering Co 28-028 Re local wtr plan e,e11.3J 3 Totals Temp Check Number 25 26 27 28 ( ' 29 30 Temp Check Number 4 1 31 32 33 4 Bl.ffm 4nr- 122, 4 i2:., f2G '23! e, X11.35 '` 3 X31 001-4200n510=70 Jan_ -rent 1-98.00 ;• l 158.00 1n' Totals Temp Check_JVumber-•_-- _----- -_-._.4 Temp Check Number 3 34 35 36 3 Board of Water Commissioners 08-44en-0.0-00 3 Board of Water Commissioners 02 -441_'3-323-30 37 38 39 10 Totals Temp Check Number 3 40 41 421 43 ( 44 45 46 ,47 48 Temp Cneck Number 6 Ez_srofftn_itd___- - O1 -eel &t E Totais._Temp_Check_Nun7ber Temp Check Number 7 7 8l ack Hl l l s Ammo 52 Totals Temp Cneck Number 7 mp_ beCk_Number-------- 8- — — 8 Col 2 l rrs l=l ectrl cal 'Const 2Z-0010 7 Lto {t1, io37`n annl fire sply 80.00 annl fire splys 80.00 130.00 _ sort:Ware -_--" •-. 436.26 $t1 -430-t2 ei'•-e0 ammo rprs 436.16 139.Z0 239. 30 400. 0t8 Jan 1991 Fr2 0:57 AM Temp Check Number 11; Temp. 2 Check 131 --Number Vendor Name ; 4 ; e Collins Electrical Cohst .8 Collins Electrical Const 04 _Totals Temp Check Number Claims List Page 1,2 City of Mendota Heights Account Code "Comments 02 02 -2'20 rprs rprs Temp Check Number 9 Comm Center 01-4330-440-00 splys 1L" !1C Totals Temp Check Humber 17, a_Temp_Check_Number 10 191 '2U! 20 Contlnental Cablevision 01-4eoe-s20-30 121 __10Contihental Cablevlsiom 01-4a00-01el-a0 341 Totals_Temp Check Number 10 ; Temp Check Number 11 ' !27; 11 Continental Safety Eq 1301 rill Totals Temp Check Humber 11 rTemp_Check Number_ 34! I I 35! 12 County Awcorder 01-3365 ; . 1.311________=__ ________ 371 12' 38 Totals Temp Check Number Je 1:2a1 ------------------ 40 Temp Check Number 23 41i '421 Colors 1431 44, 4C1 I • [491 1471 1.40; 23 TOtals_Temp_Check Humber Temp Check Number 24 01 -4305-0%0-70 _ 13 49; 14 Dona Currie 02-2010 1511 14 Totals Temp Check Humber 14 Te_mp_Ch ecis,_ Number__ _2* -5G1 , 15 Custom Fire Apparatus 02-0020 ‘k.7! Jan svc Jan svc =05.00 034.00 ___----- 2 , 069. Zia 00 zn.00 5.95 9.95 11.90 part 850.00 fillng fee - ,splys exp relmb 580.00 -^ .1• y -• - • 2.00 , 20.00 55 Z8 co c7i 55.08 39. 43 rprs 9, 2,30. 00 171, Jan 1991 Fr2 0:57 AM Temp Check Number 11; Temp. 2 Check 131 --Number Vendor Name ; 4 ; e Collins Electrical Cohst .8 Collins Electrical Const 04 _Totals Temp Check Number Claims List Page 1,2 City of Mendota Heights Account Code "Comments 02 02 -2'20 rprs rprs Temp Check Number 9 Comm Center 01-4330-440-00 splys 1L" !1C Totals Temp Check Humber 17, a_Temp_Check_Number 10 191 '2U! 20 Contlnental Cablevision 01-4eoe-s20-30 121 __10Contihental Cablevlsiom 01-4a00-01el-a0 341 Totals_Temp Check Number 10 ; Temp Check Number 11 ' !27; 11 Continental Safety Eq 1301 rill Totals Temp Check Humber 11 rTemp_Check Number_ 34! I I 35! 12 County Awcorder 01-3365 ; . 1.311________=__ ________ 371 12' 38 Totals Temp Check Number Je 1:2a1 ------------------ 40 Temp Check Number 23 41i '421 Colors 1431 44, 4C1 I • [491 1471 1.40; 23 TOtals_Temp_Check Humber Temp Check Number 24 01 -4305-0%0-70 _ 13 49; 14 Dona Currie 02-2010 1511 14 Totals Temp Check Humber 14 Te_mp_Ch ecis,_ Number__ _2* -5G1 , 15 Custom Fire Apparatus 02-0020 ‘k.7! Jan svc Jan svc =05.00 034.00 ___----- 2 , 069. Zia 00 zn.00 5.95 9.95 11.90 part 850.00 fillng fee - ,splys exp relmb 580.00 -^ .1• y -• - • 2.00 , 20.00 55 Z8 co c7i 55.08 39. 43 rprs 9, 2,30. 00 171, - 1 Fri 8:87 PM 1 Temp Check Number Temp - 2 CheCR ------Number-Vendor:Name _ .4 18 •••-••••••• 11 38 s -Temp ,Check Number Temp Check Number 16 16 Dahlgren Shardlow Uban 16 Dahlgren Snardlow Uban ;13 114 hs 1 -- Claims ilst Page City or Mendota Heights __Account_Code 01 -eolla ol-eolo Comments Amount. Nov retainer Nov Re ord amend n,e3o_oo 1,408.00 3e7-66 3e 2,735.66 Totals Temp Check Number 16 116 Temp 17 118 11290 (21 22 23 24 125 1 .26 127 128 129 30 1.1 ,32 1 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 46 41 42 Check Number 17 1.7_Dakota_County_ Abstract o.3-eolo _Re_parkland_acq _1:5 00 •el• 17 18.00 Totals-Temp.Check Number Temp Check Number 28 19 Dakota County Chamber of comm e2-4490-000-00 28 Totals Temp Check Number 10 rnp_CbekJ.mber_.,. i9 ; • community directory 600.00 !ne) 800 00 13,1 41! 19 Dakota County Tecn s, -ler 02-e020 Dec trng 400.00 •::',:,0 29 400.00 43','• 1 Totals Temp Check Number 29 Temp Check number- eo egg -Dawson -Inc 02 -4330-49090_ 00 Dawson Inc 26-4490-000-00 15:0 Dawson Inc 00-4460-000-00 Ve_Lake_ST bij rlii benne 890.00 5,1! Re parks 2, ese. 065; 43 44 45 4467 48 60 Totais Temp check Number Temp Check Number 49 50 51 52 53 54 SS 56 k7 '1c11 -------- 571 —1Ve....7.; 58: eo 59;.. / 60 61 1E:1 621 03 _nameplates 3#.25.0 64 65 65 15:2 34.90 67 _Memp_Check_Number _el 68 69 70 • Temp Check Number 9971 7:3 37-4460-000-00 Re F H hydr cony 7., 389 8874 75,1 7 ee Davies Water Eq - 1 Fri 8:87 PM 1 Temp Check Number Temp - 2 CheCR ------Number-Vendor:Name _ .4 18 •••-••••••• 11 38 s -Temp ,Check Number Temp Check Number 16 16 Dahlgren Shardlow Uban 16 Dahlgren Snardlow Uban ;13 114 hs 1 -- Claims ilst Page City or Mendota Heights __Account_Code 01 -eolla ol-eolo Comments Amount. Nov retainer Nov Re ord amend n,e3o_oo 1,408.00 3e7-66 3e 2,735.66 Totals Temp Check Number 16 116 Temp 17 118 11290 (21 22 23 24 125 1 .26 127 128 129 30 1.1 ,32 1 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 46 41 42 Check Number 17 1.7_Dakota_County_ Abstract o.3-eolo _Re_parkland_acq _1:5 00 •el• 17 18.00 Totals-Temp.Check Number Temp Check Number 28 19 Dakota County Chamber of comm e2-4490-000-00 28 Totals Temp Check Number 10 rnp_CbekJ.mber_.,. i9 ; • community directory 600.00 !ne) 800 00 13,1 41! 19 Dakota County Tecn s, -ler 02-e020 Dec trng 400.00 •::',:,0 29 400.00 43','• 1 Totals Temp Check Number 29 Temp Check number- eo egg -Dawson -Inc 02 -4330-49090_ 00 Dawson Inc 26-4490-000-00 15:0 Dawson Inc 00-4460-000-00 Ve_Lake_ST bij rlii benne 890.00 5,1! Re parks 2, ese. 065; 43 44 45 4467 48 60 Totais Temp check Number Temp Check Number 49 50 51 52 53 54 SS 56 k7 '1c11 -------- 571 —1Ve....7.; 58: eo 59;.. / 60 61 1E:1 621 03 _nameplates 3#.25.0 64 65 65 15:2 34.90 67 _Memp_Check_Number _el 68 69 70 • Temp Check Number 9971 7:3 37-4460-000-00 Re F H hydr cony 7., 389 8874 75,1 7 ee Davies Water Eq r 17' Jan 39`J'1 Fri 8:87 AM 1, Temp Check Number E-2 Ternp. Claims List City of Mendota Heights 2 Check �1— Number --Vendor-- Name — __-_-_.__.-_ _ __Account i4 e2 Davies Water eq 37-4450-080-88 17 44 6 Totals Ternp _heck Number 1t0 Temp Check Number 23 Ivy ,e3oddriay.J came Align ,12 74 e3 X15' Tot a)s._Temp_Check Number____ nv n1 176 /In '70 !2t 22 124 25 26 127 25 129 30 311 32 133 34 135 36 137 38 139 140 Temp Check Number 04 81-'4330-448-£8 _ i_4 Electro Watchman 15-4330-490-60 24 Totals Temp Check Number 24 Temp Check Number^ 01, Hage 4 Re F H hydr cony e,491.04 10,03'6.90 _197.00_ 157.8 arrnl mtcrr L 9 84.00 08 first Trust 14-4436-000-00 77 bds __IB5 .rSt Trust_.- .__,-_ 14-4ee6-800-'00 77 bds e8 F1 rst Trust 11-4456-000-00 70 bds 28 First Trust 11-4225-000•-4+0 78 bds First Trust .-------_-._--- ---- 14-4485-000-00_. 73 bds 75 bds 76—bds 28 First Trust t i rst Trust %'1 iJst. Trust 85 First Trust 88 First 'Trust 25--F,!rst_Trust_--� --- 28 First Trust 380_ Totals Ternp Check Number 14-4006-008-00 14-4486-000-00 .14-4226--000-00 14-4486-000-00 28-4456--000••00 385-4486-008-00 14-4226-080-W0 77 bds 77 bds 77 bds 77 bds 547 42 B C-ri_ePh_PgumbPr. 1461 86 First Trust "6_Eir^st YrLst 86 f=irst Trust 86 First 'Trust Elrst Trust 25 First Trust e6 F1 rst Trust 5t 815 F l rS. Truest 52 es first Trust 53 ee First Trust 54. h� Flroz.t_Trm5r 286 0,178.80 188.80 2,880.00 185.88 17;000.00 188.88 645.08 188 08 8,814.00 737.213 1,071.30 108.80 16, 1Ll.90 ,t4! 4.i i •c5 57 5Li 01 -21 18 pr.t nc bd pymts 260, 000. @r0 ,I St1-129htt przinc bd pymts 860,08+0 ` 8ctr=91 37-4456-0084-00 78 bds 38r, 070.00 iS.t,1 37-4086-000-00 78 bds 109.38 ;c3I 15-4486-000-00 83_7ds 15,81:0‘...Z8 E6a 18-4488-008-870 83 bds' - 1,12102+.00 - 165+ 16-4486-000-00 83 2385 18,078.00' !671 88-4486-000-00 86 bcjs 50,780.0S) ;C81 74-4498-000-00 05 2385 110, 5.°00.00 15s' 74-4496-000-00 85 bds 33, 507.80 I7t! 2e-4200-000-00 SYS...fe 100.00_. 17ai .73! 74. 1751 til Temp_ Chock_Mumber 26 ---------- 417,884.38 175) r 17' Jan 39`J'1 Fri 8:87 AM 1, Temp Check Number E-2 Ternp. Claims List City of Mendota Heights 2 Check �1— Number --Vendor-- Name — __-_-_.__.-_ _ __Account i4 e2 Davies Water eq 37-4450-080-88 17 44 6 Totals Ternp _heck Number 1t0 Temp Check Number 23 Ivy ,e3oddriay.J came Align ,12 74 e3 X15' Tot a)s._Temp_Check Number____ nv n1 176 /In '70 !2t 22 124 25 26 127 25 129 30 311 32 133 34 135 36 137 38 139 140 Temp Check Number 04 81-'4330-448-£8 _ i_4 Electro Watchman 15-4330-490-60 24 Totals Temp Check Number 24 Temp Check Number^ 01, Hage 4 Re F H hydr cony e,491.04 10,03'6.90 _197.00_ 157.8 arrnl mtcrr L 9 84.00 08 first Trust 14-4436-000-00 77 bds __IB5 .rSt Trust_.- .__,-_ 14-4ee6-800-'00 77 bds e8 F1 rst Trust 11-4456-000-00 70 bds 28 First Trust 11-4225-000•-4+0 78 bds First Trust .-------_-._--- ---- 14-4485-000-00_. 73 bds 75 bds 76—bds 28 First Trust t i rst Trust %'1 iJst. Trust 85 First Trust 88 First 'Trust 25--F,!rst_Trust_--� --- 28 First Trust 380_ Totals Ternp Check Number 14-4006-008-00 14-4486-000-00 .14-4226--000-00 14-4486-000-00 28-4456--000••00 385-4486-008-00 14-4226-080-W0 77 bds 77 bds 77 bds 77 bds 547 42 B C-ri_ePh_PgumbPr. 1461 86 First Trust "6_Eir^st YrLst 86 f=irst Trust 86 First 'Trust Elrst Trust 25 First Trust e6 F1 rst Trust 5t 815 F l rS. Truest 52 es first Trust 53 ee First Trust 54. h� Flroz.t_Trm5r 286 0,178.80 188.80 2,880.00 185.88 17;000.00 188.88 645.08 188 08 8,814.00 737.213 1,071.30 108.80 16, 1Ll.90 ,t4! 4.i i •c5 57 5Li 01 -21 18 pr.t nc bd pymts 260, 000. @r0 ,I St1-129htt przinc bd pymts 860,08+0 ` 8ctr=91 37-4456-0084-00 78 bds 38r, 070.00 iS.t,1 37-4086-000-00 78 bds 109.38 ;c3I 15-4486-000-00 83_7ds 15,81:0‘...Z8 E6a 18-4488-008-870 83 bds' - 1,12102+.00 - 165+ 16-4486-000-00 83 2385 18,078.00' !671 88-4486-000-00 86 bcjs 50,780.0S) ;C81 74-4498-000-00 05 2385 110, 5.°00.00 15s' 74-4496-000-00 85 bds 33, 507.80 I7t! 2e-4200-000-00 SYS...fe 100.00_. 17ai .73! 74. 1751 til Temp_ Chock_Mumber 26 ---------- 417,884.38 175) 1i Jan lsel -1 Pr1 8297 PM . Temp Check Number 2 Temp. Check Number -Vendor Name 134 27 F 8 8 Capitol Mkt 8rp 97 e7 a Totals Temp Check NUMber 110 11 112 113 14' 115 116 '17' 1 19 •20 121 122 '23 124 i25 125 27 128 129 130 131 32 133 34 135 .35 137 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Temp Check Number 20 Claims ilst Page 8 City or Mendota Heights I !' Account Cade 3n -4ees -zoo -cte • es First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-0071 Comments__ _ . __Amount_ svc re' 3.78 08 First Interstate Bank Trustee 82-413e-oe0-ee Jan prem 08 First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-4130-080-80 Jan prem 281-7-J1-st-interstate Bank.Trustee. 01-413E-070-70- -Tan-prem 21e Tatais_Temp_Cneck Number_ _ _es Temp Check Number es 28 Breen flay Packaging 01-00/0 recycle bins 0'3 Totals Temp Check member. E9 Temp -Check -Number _-_ _30 30 Hagen Office Eq 01-4330-440-00 30 Totals Temp Check Number 30 Temp Check Number 31 1.2 Ndwe_Mank, .02,430n7030-,30 31 Hdwe Hank 01-4308-080-00 3.78 57,97 0/.39 82.08 316.08 530.00 030.00 rpr hard drive 48.00 1 r '23 134.1 splys splys 48.80 Totals Temp Check Humber 32 .03F-2nech_itlumber .33 32 Hindlng Heating se Totals Temp check Number 18.72 _02_40 01-4330-018-70 rprs 103.00 32 Temp Check Number 33 52 53 54 SS 56 -41__Hoist__Exr 33 *total s_Te.mia_Check_Number Temp Check Number 34 01=0010 . 33 103.00 :57 1,58 ,69 :CO .C2 65 166 / 167 Ac_lng_aana 59 1,001.94 P, 72 73 74 75 1i Jan lsel -1 Pr1 8297 PM . Temp Check Number 2 Temp. Check Number -Vendor Name 134 27 F 8 8 Capitol Mkt 8rp 97 e7 a Totals Temp Check NUMber 110 11 112 113 14' 115 116 '17' 1 19 •20 121 122 '23 124 i25 125 27 128 129 130 131 32 133 34 135 .35 137 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Temp Check Number 20 Claims ilst Page 8 City or Mendota Heights I !' Account Cade 3n -4ees -zoo -cte • es First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-0071 Comments__ _ . __Amount_ svc re' 3.78 08 First Interstate Bank Trustee 82-413e-oe0-ee Jan prem 08 First Interstate Bank Trustee 01-4130-080-80 Jan prem 281-7-J1-st-interstate Bank.Trustee. 01-413E-070-70- -Tan-prem 21e Tatais_Temp_Cneck Number_ _ _es Temp Check Number es 28 Breen flay Packaging 01-00/0 recycle bins 0'3 Totals Temp Check member. E9 Temp -Check -Number _-_ _30 30 Hagen Office Eq 01-4330-440-00 30 Totals Temp Check Number 30 Temp Check Number 31 1.2 Ndwe_Mank, .02,430n7030-,30 31 Hdwe Hank 01-4308-080-00 3.78 57,97 0/.39 82.08 316.08 530.00 030.00 rpr hard drive 48.00 1 r '23 134.1 splys splys 48.80 Totals Temp Check Humber 32 .03F-2nech_itlumber .33 32 Hindlng Heating se Totals Temp check Number 18.72 _02_40 01-4330-018-70 rprs 103.00 32 Temp Check Number 33 52 53 54 SS 56 -41__Hoist__Exr 33 *total s_Te.mia_Check_Number Temp Check Number 34 01=0010 . 33 103.00 :57 1,58 ,69 :CO .C2 65 166 / 167 Ac_lng_aana 59 1,001.94 P, 72 73 74 75 11 Jar, 1991 Fr1 0:57 A1+1 Temp Check Number 34 Temp. Check Number -vender -Name 34 1' AA T 1 sem/ nor Claims List City or Mendota Heights Account Code .-.---•--. -----_-.__cmments_.----_.-----_----.____--•---rSmctrrrt--_--- 01-4409-0e0-•39 rear Wicks 80.00 i' 1 34 8 Totals Temp Check Number 34 19 110 11 113 14 115 116 17 18 Temp Check Number 3:5 35 1 nt 1 assn of 50P 01:-4404-000-00 35 •i_ota2s_Temp_Ctreck•- Number --.-_- __-- _ 35,------ Temp Check Number 36 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 00.00 dues - _100.00 36 Hnox Commercial Credit 01-4305-060-50 spays 36 t(J,ox Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70 spl ys '16_Hr,cx_Commercial_Cred1t--_._ .01-4305-070-70-.----- ._.-_ 38 ttncx Commercial Cred.! t 01-4305-050-50 spays 36 ttnox Commercial Credit 01-430-070-70 rtn 36 fSnox__Commer.c-1al...Cred/t--_.-x__---.01. X4305-070-70. ----- _ _-splys- 36 finox Commercial Credit 00-4335-0100-00 spays X27 Lei 28 Totals Temp Check Number 36 32. 37 Thomas ttnuth 43-4415-846-00 ml reimb 03.66 p Check_ flgmber 37 190.90 37.16 3e. 97 e. 159. 00cr 7 7e.1'8+ 1'e.7. 37 002. in... 33 37 Thomas.-ttnuth 05-4415-105-15 Jan allow 10 100 a4 37 Thomas ftnuth 05-4300-105-15 exp reimb 40.15 15 '35 73.31 36 11,1 37 Totals Temp Check Number 37 4 1 } kit i• 4^ 38 391 Temp Cflec}S�vttmber- 38 140 41 38 ttrecbs 1:7,1` 1 ce Machines 01-0010 010 spl ys 084.85 42 *Ae1_tSi^_Rc12S f]T!:/ c� _?2arhs n_es-----._01-012112e SP.tys 90 5 43 38 firechs Office Machines 01-4300-030-30 sp1 ys 69.90 44 30 firechs Orrice Mach/ 'les 01-4300-•030-30 installation 198:00 45 0_Mrochs_Oti tee .Machl.nes---- ....01=e020 camputer_syc a5 38 ttrechs OT r2 ce Machines 01-4300-110-10 sp1 ys 7.30 47 36 Hrechs Office Machines 01-i_='010 spays 337.00 r- 59 r 48 59 49 50 Totals Temp Check Number 38 e66 51 0,107.67 52 53 54 Temp Check Number 39 55 56 �57 3�_f.,eagst� c!P_.11n C>txfes 91 -2024 Jan prem 5100.,J..3 '441 '671 17°, It ts• '72' 17731 .741 17;1 11 Jar, 1991 Fr1 0:57 A1+1 Temp Check Number 34 Temp. Check Number -vender -Name 34 1' AA T 1 sem/ nor Claims List City or Mendota Heights Account Code .-.---•--. -----_-.__cmments_.----_.-----_----.____--•---rSmctrrrt--_--- 01-4409-0e0-•39 rear Wicks 80.00 i' 1 34 8 Totals Temp Check Number 34 19 110 11 113 14 115 116 17 18 Temp Check Number 3:5 35 1 nt 1 assn of 50P 01:-4404-000-00 35 •i_ota2s_Temp_Ctreck•- Number --.-_- __-- _ 35,------ Temp Check Number 36 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 00.00 dues - _100.00 36 Hnox Commercial Credit 01-4305-060-50 spays 36 t(J,ox Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70 spl ys '16_Hr,cx_Commercial_Cred1t--_._ .01-4305-070-70-.----- ._.-_ 38 ttncx Commercial Cred.! t 01-4305-050-50 spays 36 ttnox Commercial Credit 01-430-070-70 rtn 36 fSnox__Commer.c-1al...Cred/t--_.-x__---.01. X4305-070-70. ----- _ _-splys- 36 finox Commercial Credit 00-4335-0100-00 spays X27 Lei 28 Totals Temp Check Number 36 32. 37 Thomas ttnuth 43-4415-846-00 ml reimb 03.66 p Check_ flgmber 37 190.90 37.16 3e. 97 e. 159. 00cr 7 7e.1'8+ 1'e.7. 37 002. in... 33 37 Thomas.-ttnuth 05-4415-105-15 Jan allow 10 100 a4 37 Thomas ftnuth 05-4300-105-15 exp reimb 40.15 15 '35 73.31 36 11,1 37 Totals Temp Check Number 37 4 1 } kit i• 4^ 38 391 Temp Cflec}S�vttmber- 38 140 41 38 ttrecbs 1:7,1` 1 ce Machines 01-0010 010 spl ys 084.85 42 *Ae1_tSi^_Rc12S f]T!:/ c� _?2arhs n_es-----._01-012112e SP.tys 90 5 43 38 firechs Office Machines 01-4300-030-30 sp1 ys 69.90 44 30 firechs Orrice Mach/ 'les 01-4300-•030-30 installation 198:00 45 0_Mrochs_Oti tee .Machl.nes---- ....01=e020 camputer_syc a5 38 ttrechs OT r2 ce Machines 01-4300-110-10 sp1 ys 7.30 47 36 Hrechs Office Machines 01-i_='010 spays 337.00 r- 59 r 48 59 49 50 Totals Temp Check Number 38 e66 51 0,107.67 52 53 54 Temp Check Number 39 55 56 �57 3�_f.,eagst� c!P_.11n C>txfes 91 -2024 Jan prem 5100.,J..3 '441 '671 17°, It ts• '72' 17731 .741 17;1 11 Jan 1992 Claims List Fri 8:37 AM C2ty of Mendota Heights Page 7 1 Temp Check Number 39 11 Temp. 2 Ch CH 11 -Number -Vendor, Name__---..___--.-_ -- .•-__-_ ---Account Code_ --.- - _. Cammerl.s-_____-._._..____-.._ ___-_....—__.Amount—.--.---_____-_-____. 4 15 39 League or Mn Cities E?2-4131-0e0--e0 I7 a l4 78 Totals Temp Check Number 39 ('0 Temp Check Number 40 11 �1a ---40 Larson AutoRpr 0/-433Z-440-00 1a 40 15 3•otal s Temp Check Number--------• ---- 40 16 17 Ternp Check Number 41 OE 19 20 21 z2 23 124 41 Charles Merterrsotto 02-0010 41 Charles Mert ensot to 01-4400-109-09 se Totals Temp Check Number 41 25 26 '27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 3S 40 41 42 Temp Check Number 4e 40_Mendota_2- eLghts _Rubbish'_ 4e Mendota Heights Rubbish. 40 Mendota Heights Rubbish4 01=2010 02-et2110 23-e020 2e6 Totals Temp Check Number 4e Temp Check Number 43 Jan prem 768.59 1 a 'x'''38. 7th mayor can? 456.60 exp rlemb 80.00 476.50 __2>ec_svr 40-40 Dec svc 106.00 Dec svc 53. Egg 001.40 i 93_detr_o_ftaste_.Control_______-___-2_r-.6010__---___.._-_-----_____ _--_SSPc sac_rhgs 31600.00 43 Metro Waste Contra/ 1 a01Q1 Dec sac chgs 36. t2n21cr Totals Temp Check Number 43 p Check_J umber 44 3,554 00 1 521 44 Midwest Business Products 01-4300-220-20spivs 19-M ;5f,1 49_171dwest _t usiness_Rroducts__._--.1111 =43!0-030-30 spl ys A „3e icoi 461 44 Midwest Business Products 01-4300-040-40spivs 3.3'� I2! all 44 Midwest Business Products 0i-4300-080-80 splys4.94 15, as 49 176 32.20 '65' 50 l67 Totals Temp Check Number 44 v /cal Temp Check Number 46 I6y1 rc! 171 45_192dwest Phota:Svc___-_-_-.02=4303=t2r4•07 0 .7_0/7 _SVC__ 64.416 :7 133 7a. -- 45 64. 4Eg 17 1 - - r • .eck_Number 4"1 - 7 11 Jan 1992 Claims List Fri 8:37 AM C2ty of Mendota Heights Page 7 1 Temp Check Number 39 11 Temp. 2 Ch CH 11 -Number -Vendor, Name__---..___--.-_ -- .•-__-_ ---Account Code_ --.- - _. Cammerl.s-_____-._._..____-.._ ___-_....—__.Amount—.--.---_____-_-____. 4 15 39 League or Mn Cities E?2-4131-0e0--e0 I7 a l4 78 Totals Temp Check Number 39 ('0 Temp Check Number 40 11 �1a ---40 Larson AutoRpr 0/-433Z-440-00 1a 40 15 3•otal s Temp Check Number--------• ---- 40 16 17 Ternp Check Number 41 OE 19 20 21 z2 23 124 41 Charles Merterrsotto 02-0010 41 Charles Mert ensot to 01-4400-109-09 se Totals Temp Check Number 41 25 26 '27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 3S 40 41 42 Temp Check Number 4e 40_Mendota_2- eLghts _Rubbish'_ 4e Mendota Heights Rubbish. 40 Mendota Heights Rubbish4 01=2010 02-et2110 23-e020 2e6 Totals Temp Check Number 4e Temp Check Number 43 Jan prem 768.59 1 a 'x'''38. 7th mayor can? 456.60 exp rlemb 80.00 476.50 __2>ec_svr 40-40 Dec svc 106.00 Dec svc 53. Egg 001.40 i 93_detr_o_ftaste_.Control_______-___-2_r-.6010__---___.._-_-----_____ _--_SSPc sac_rhgs 31600.00 43 Metro Waste Contra/ 1 a01Q1 Dec sac chgs 36. t2n21cr Totals Temp Check Number 43 p Check_J umber 44 3,554 00 1 521 44 Midwest Business Products 01-4300-220-20spivs 19-M ;5f,1 49_171dwest _t usiness_Rroducts__._--.1111 =43!0-030-30 spl ys A „3e icoi 461 44 Midwest Business Products 01-4300-040-40spivs 3.3'� I2! all 44 Midwest Business Products 0i-4300-080-80 splys4.94 15, as 49 176 32.20 '65' 50 l67 Totals Temp Check Number 44 v /cal Temp Check Number 46 I6y1 rc! 171 45_192dwest Phota:Svc___-_-_-.02=4303=t2r4•07 0 .7_0/7 _SVC__ 64.416 :7 133 7a. -- 45 64. 4Eg 17 1 - - r • .eck_Number 4"1 - 7 23 Jan 2993 - Fri - 0:67 AM Temp Check Number 46 1 1 Temp 21 Check .2.-1_-NumberVendor_Name 7j 8 __---.3:CtalS_TeMp_CrieCH. Number__ 111 Ternp Check Number 47 Claims List Page6 City of Mendota Heights 46 Minn Cellular Tele Co 46__M1nn_Cellular.Tele Co -90 12' _ 47 Minn Dept of Revenue 02-e1520 Dec fuel tax 209.00 14 1 -- l' 15 47 2 Va. 1210 _ ____. Account_Code Comments 01-4000-820-80 01-4000-810-00 46 ly Amount R. Jan svc an svc4.9n ------z.___________________-----. - J 990 16 Totals Temp Check Number 47 .17 Temp Check Number. 48 20 48 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-0070 Def annuity 0:60.01a 211 22 48 060.00 -- .23 Total s Temp Check Number 46 24 25 Temp Check Number 49 26 .0.lonesota_leamSter Loc. 300 01 -07 Jan dues 225-00 ni 2W 29 48 eas.oe 30 TQta.t.5.__Iemp_u41ec4 Number 49 - 31 4:, 32 Temp Check Number 60 --.f 1 4:-. 341 00 Morton Thokol 02-4402-060-60 safe t salt 898.03 14r n .4c t 60 -- 698.03 . ;4e 4.'. 36 Totals Temp Check Number Ze 27 m 'LI, p...17.ec:k_Ommbelz_ z1 .G.i .i.9. L.: 61 MORE 02-4400-000-00 regr 2/30 :....._ ;L.: nl eZ.00 14 Totals Temp Check Number Z2 ' 92' y 45 GO; 40 41 42 43 46 47 413 9 SO 51 52 53 54 55 56 Temp Check Number Ze ill zo NW= 01-4404-000-00 2991 dues 260.00 i94, --- CC. =4.1' 190.00 67! ; J Totals Temp Check Number Za :01 C5, Temp Check Number 63 71' J7:1;1 63 Northern State Power 03-4..1,93-336-30 Jan svc 066.28 74: 175) 23 Jan 2993 - Fri - 0:67 AM Temp Check Number 46 1 1 Temp 21 Check .2.-1_-NumberVendor_Name 7j 8 __---.3:CtalS_TeMp_CrieCH. Number__ 111 Ternp Check Number 47 Claims List Page6 City of Mendota Heights 46 Minn Cellular Tele Co 46__M1nn_Cellular.Tele Co -90 12' _ 47 Minn Dept of Revenue 02-e1520 Dec fuel tax 209.00 14 1 -- l' 15 47 2 Va. 1210 _ ____. Account_Code Comments 01-4000-820-80 01-4000-810-00 46 ly Amount R. Jan svc an svc4.9n ------z.___________________-----. - J 990 16 Totals Temp Check Number 47 .17 Temp Check Number. 48 20 48 Minn Mutual Life Ins 01-0070 Def annuity 0:60.01a 211 22 48 060.00 -- .23 Total s Temp Check Number 46 24 25 Temp Check Number 49 26 .0.lonesota_leamSter Loc. 300 01 -07 Jan dues 225-00 ni 2W 29 48 eas.oe 30 TQta.t.5.__Iemp_u41ec4 Number 49 - 31 4:, 32 Temp Check Number 60 --.f 1 4:-. 341 00 Morton Thokol 02-4402-060-60 safe t salt 898.03 14r n .4c t 60 -- 698.03 . ;4e 4.'. 36 Totals Temp Check Number Ze 27 m 'LI, p...17.ec:k_Ommbelz_ z1 .G.i .i.9. L.: 61 MORE 02-4400-000-00 regr 2/30 :....._ ;L.: nl eZ.00 14 Totals Temp Check Number Z2 ' 92' y 45 GO; 40 41 42 43 46 47 413 9 SO 51 52 53 54 55 56 Temp Check Number Ze ill zo NW= 01-4404-000-00 2991 dues 260.00 i94, --- CC. =4.1' 190.00 67! ; J Totals Temp Check Number Za :01 C5, Temp Check Number 63 71' J7:1;1 63 Northern State Power 03-4..1,93-336-30 Jan svc 066.28 74: 175) 12 Jan 1991 Claims List Page 9 Fri 8:57 AM city of Mendota Heights Temp check Number 53 I' Ternp- 2 C77eck i3{--Numbe, 1.-Name----------_--_---_-__-Acec,urrt_Code--------.--...--•-•_._---Ccunments-------.-----.-_-_Amount a 5-__ 53 2Vorthe.rn State Power K11 -4611~ -31121 -Jar, •50 SVC '39..1.64 17 ;� 4ri� 53 Northern State Power.__. - --01-4212-310-71A ---__--_-Jan --- .993.6!4--____.____ - 17 r- 53 Northern State Power 13 -421e -•3112,-6,2e Jan svc - 593.63 - ..) 8 I„ 53 24orthern State Power 01-40.18-38 0-70 Jan svc 254.40 53 Northern .state .Power_-- _ .. 15-4912-400-60 __ --Jar, _svc_--__.-_.._. - _ i'0 53 Northern State Power 08-4212-099-80 Jan svc 637.93 111 53 Northern state Power 28-421I-000-00 Jan svc en e.4n 1,:�,53_Northern_State Power _ _ .. 01-4021-400-50 -. _-Jan -svc _-. _ _- ---.-.---- _ _133.04 1 113 53 Northern State Power 08-4211--0ee-00 Jan svc 726, 2J �75 n3 Norther» State Power 01-4211-31=0-743 Jan svc 98.95 33-Mor-ther37._State Power ___ .___.-.---13-4222-400-60.__-.-- ..__---..--.--__. Jars -svc•.__---- ._-.._---_--- 996.,43•-------. T116. .7 836 5,149.74 s 1e Trta15_.Ternp_.Check _Number __.--.----_.., 53 119 20Temp check Number 34 1 121 122 '23 54 Northern State Power 02-4.211-320-50 Jar, svc 54 Northern State Power 02•-4922-•320-7e Jan svc 24 1";4jgcfrt13err, State- Power..-- .-.-.-_._. 15-�i21 i -320-6 3 ,Jan syc 25 26 268 27 re+tals� emp Eheck,_Numbei2_.-__._ -_ ._ . 54 ^<9 29 Temp check Number 99 30 31 • r15 NorweSt Dank Mpis 32 55 Norwest Hank Mpls 33 99_.Norweet-Sanlr_4p1 s --�. a4 55 Norwest Bank Mpgs 35 55 Norwest Sank Mpa s 36 35 Norwest tank _mpis 37 5 Norwest Sank Mpis 39 55 Norwest Hank Mpis 39 r, 1Var�.uest_P8,,k_Mp1s 40 55 Norwest Sank Mpl s 41 X15 Norwest Bank Mpis 42 43 44 45 45 47 4e ._--•------------813.50 ---- ------ el 5.50 223_ 49 646.49 01 -el 25 princ bd pymts 01-2290 prim. bd pymts sem, 00121. 'rocs- __________ 0cr -______ S.e.-44✓s=octet=eo___-•------- ___ --__ _.-7_i-.bds• 30,;:-'20.09___--___._______________.0,::e./ en -44x6--eeo-eo 79 bds 8,359.50 ..c; I 85-4006-000-00 79 bds 000.00 14-4456-70007-0075 bids b 337.50 14 79 ds 200.00 14-4456-70007-00£;481 ' 90 go bds 39, 606. 66 51: 90 bo bds 000.00 14 69 bds 75, 000.110 "`-3i 87 bds 52, 030.00 ':41 87 bds200.20 Sr E.7i 6602667431.629 !s, 1 Totals Temp_check-.Number_ 59 col -1LS Temp Check Number 56 k_ •21 x.25, 000. 013 :411 2 4-4.226--000-ee 21-4458-000--00 _1 i. 42_26-000-00 35-4455-000-'00 35-4456-000-00 n5._Nor._west_Bank_Mpl s 35-4"267,00mveve 49 50 52 53 54 55 56 �57 56 Norwest Plank Mp1 el s 32 -445✓ -000-00 87 bds 250, 0021. 00 ;651 58 Norwest Barrk Mp3 5 31-•44:sP�-�t21deS1-¢e¢+ 67 bds 54, 76e.. '0121 271 671 1 5_2Vr o weaT Etanf_c-Mp1-s_ _____4228021-00 SZpQs 200.00 -4'1 17` 160 004,980.00 171' T-4eS.a1.5_Te:mp Cl3eck Number 56 .7a 7:i1 '741 i75j 179, Temp Check Number 37 12 Jan 1991 Claims List Page 9 Fri 8:57 AM city of Mendota Heights Temp check Number 53 I' Ternp- 2 C77eck i3{--Numbe, 1.-Name----------_--_---_-__-Acec,urrt_Code--------.--...--•-•_._---Ccunments-------.-----.-_-_Amount a 5-__ 53 2Vorthe.rn State Power K11 -4611~ -31121 -Jar, •50 SVC '39..1.64 17 ;� 4ri� 53 Northern State Power.__. - --01-4212-310-71A ---__--_-Jan --- .993.6!4--____.____ - 17 r- 53 Northern State Power 13 -421e -•3112,-6,2e Jan svc - 593.63 - ..) 8 I„ 53 24orthern State Power 01-40.18-38 0-70 Jan svc 254.40 53 Northern .state .Power_-- _ .. 15-4912-400-60 __ --Jar, _svc_--__.-_.._. - _ i'0 53 Northern State Power 08-4212-099-80 Jan svc 637.93 111 53 Northern state Power 28-421I-000-00 Jan svc en e.4n 1,:�,53_Northern_State Power _ _ .. 01-4021-400-50 -. _-Jan -svc _-. _ _- ---.-.---- _ _133.04 1 113 53 Northern State Power 08-4211--0ee-00 Jan svc 726, 2J �75 n3 Norther» State Power 01-4211-31=0-743 Jan svc 98.95 33-Mor-ther37._State Power ___ .___.-.---13-4222-400-60.__-.-- ..__---..--.--__. Jars -svc•.__---- ._-.._---_--- 996.,43•-------. T116. .7 836 5,149.74 s 1e Trta15_.Ternp_.Check _Number __.--.----_.., 53 119 20Temp check Number 34 1 121 122 '23 54 Northern State Power 02-4.211-320-50 Jar, svc 54 Northern State Power 02•-4922-•320-7e Jan svc 24 1";4jgcfrt13err, State- Power..-- .-.-.-_._. 15-�i21 i -320-6 3 ,Jan syc 25 26 268 27 re+tals� emp Eheck,_Numbei2_.-__._ -_ ._ . 54 ^<9 29 Temp check Number 99 30 31 • r15 NorweSt Dank Mpis 32 55 Norwest Hank Mpls 33 99_.Norweet-Sanlr_4p1 s --�. a4 55 Norwest Bank Mpgs 35 55 Norwest Sank Mpa s 36 35 Norwest tank _mpis 37 5 Norwest Sank Mpis 39 55 Norwest Hank Mpis 39 r, 1Var�.uest_P8,,k_Mp1s 40 55 Norwest Sank Mpl s 41 X15 Norwest Bank Mpis 42 43 44 45 45 47 4e ._--•------------813.50 ---- ------ el 5.50 223_ 49 646.49 01 -el 25 princ bd pymts 01-2290 prim. bd pymts sem, 00121. 'rocs- __________ 0cr -______ S.e.-44✓s=octet=eo___-•------- ___ --__ _.-7_i-.bds• 30,;:-'20.09___--___._______________.0,::e./ en -44x6--eeo-eo 79 bds 8,359.50 ..c; I 85-4006-000-00 79 bds 000.00 14-4456-70007-0075 bids b 337.50 14 79 ds 200.00 14-4456-70007-00£;481 ' 90 go bds 39, 606. 66 51: 90 bo bds 000.00 14 69 bds 75, 000.110 "`-3i 87 bds 52, 030.00 ':41 87 bds200.20 Sr E.7i 6602667431.629 !s, 1 Totals Temp_check-.Number_ 59 col -1LS Temp Check Number 56 k_ •21 x.25, 000. 013 :411 2 4-4.226--000-ee 21-4458-000--00 _1 i. 42_26-000-00 35-4455-000-'00 35-4456-000-00 n5._Nor._west_Bank_Mpl s 35-4"267,00mveve 49 50 52 53 54 55 56 �57 56 Norwest Plank Mp1 el s 32 -445✓ -000-00 87 bds 250, 0021. 00 ;651 58 Norwest Barrk Mp3 5 31-•44:sP�-�t21deS1-¢e¢+ 67 bds 54, 76e.. '0121 271 671 1 5_2Vr o weaT Etanf_c-Mp1-s_ _____4228021-00 SZpQs 200.00 -4'1 17` 160 004,980.00 171' T-4eS.a1.5_Te:mp Cl3eck Number 56 .7a 7:i1 '741 i75j 179, Temp Check Number 37 21 Jan 2Sy1 Claims List Pr] 0;37 AM City or Mendota He]ghts Temp Check Number 37 1 2 3 4 6 Temp. Check Number -vendor -Name- ---- 57 umber —Vendor -t r/1e-- 8 J10 111 �12 113 14 115 116 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 37 Pub/ 2c Snip! fief ASSY/ �J ub13c_.£rnpl_ 224 Tota25_Temp-.Check_Number._. Temp Check Number 36 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 43 49 50 51 -- 52 53 54 55 556 k7 64 Trrt32-Mreather r lccoun t _.Code 01 -8074 01-4131-210-10_ 58 Ou311 Corp 01-;-010 `,6 Totals Temp Check Number 36 Temp Check Number 33 S Road Rescue 02-4305-080-20 ZS Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 60 -21.anitary Pr_aducts Co 06-4333-000=00 60 TataJsXemp._Check_Number_-------..__CO Temp Check Number 61 Page 10 _-Comments _____ Amount San prem _Sa»_prem 43, 00 --- - _- 00_ 34. 00 splys 333.00 s pi ys 377.e3 377.en spt-ys 249 60 243.80 1 I' I .;2 62 Solberg Aggregate 01-44:82-030-50 sand 51 Totals Temp Check Number 82 j?�r'YjEC;[Mbar' 6'i 96'330 663.6.9 se Snyder Drug stares 2+1-4309-2r80-00 61 O*Y-fier=.Jirug-9tpres_ ol-4303=•ef irr-:e1h se Snyder Drug Stores 01-4303-030-30 106 Totals Temp Check Number 6e mp- 3t76c?s_'umber 63 83 St Paul Soak S Statlonery 01-4380-830-30 splys 21.07 sp1ys 6 .8 spl ys 7.34 04..70 spl ys 2 3. 46 83 Totals Temp Check Number 83 23.46 Terrip Check Number 64 01=44.30-030-50 11,,P2_svc 79_00 ,4f. 57, 15r1 00, 1 16'; ;5. GL1 Ell Yt '08I ;531 1701H. ! 72, ) 21 Jan 2Sy1 Claims List Pr] 0;37 AM City or Mendota He]ghts Temp Check Number 37 1 2 3 4 6 Temp. Check Number -vendor -Name- ---- 57 umber —Vendor -t r/1e-- 8 J10 111 �12 113 14 115 116 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 37 Pub/ 2c Snip! fief ASSY/ �J ub13c_.£rnpl_ 224 Tota25_Temp-.Check_Number._. Temp Check Number 36 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 43 49 50 51 -- 52 53 54 55 556 k7 64 Trrt32-Mreather r lccoun t _.Code 01 -8074 01-4131-210-10_ 58 Ou311 Corp 01-;-010 `,6 Totals Temp Check Number 36 Temp Check Number 33 S Road Rescue 02-4305-080-20 ZS Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 60 -21.anitary Pr_aducts Co 06-4333-000=00 60 TataJsXemp._Check_Number_-------..__CO Temp Check Number 61 Page 10 _-Comments _____ Amount San prem _Sa»_prem 43, 00 --- - _- 00_ 34. 00 splys 333.00 s pi ys 377.e3 377.en spt-ys 249 60 243.80 1 I' I .;2 62 Solberg Aggregate 01-44:82-030-50 sand 51 Totals Temp Check Number 82 j?�r'YjEC;[Mbar' 6'i 96'330 663.6.9 se Snyder Drug stares 2+1-4309-2r80-00 61 O*Y-fier=.Jirug-9tpres_ ol-4303=•ef irr-:e1h se Snyder Drug Stores 01-4303-030-30 106 Totals Temp Check Number 6e mp- 3t76c?s_'umber 63 83 St Paul Soak S Statlonery 01-4380-830-30 splys 21.07 sp1ys 6 .8 spl ys 7.34 04..70 spl ys 2 3. 46 83 Totals Temp Check Number 83 23.46 Terrip Check Number 64 01=44.30-030-50 11,,P2_svc 79_00 ,4f. 57, 15r1 00, 1 16'; ;5. GL1 Ell Yt '08I ;531 1701H. ! 72, ) 2 2 Jan 1991 Claims List Page 22 Fr2 84.67 AM Clty of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number 64 1 Ternp. 2 Check 3 1-4-i--Number-=-Vendor Name a 7 a 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 64 Account -Code _ • _ -•, -- • - Totals Temp Check Number 64 66 Trl Cc,uhty Law Enfc Assn 65 Totals Temp Check Number 02-4404-080-00 65 Temp Check Number 86 02-2210 66 Totals Temp_Check Number66 Temp Check Number 67 25 I126 27 Comments __Amount 1991 dues 45.00 45. 00 4 -41_868 _50 -------- 12c" , 3,0:68.60 ST U 9 West communlcatlons 02-9020 Dec svc 67 U 6 West Communications lti-4920-e6521-set Jan svc 28 29 30 !332 33 34 36 922-99 06.ea 1 134 Totals Temp Check Number 67 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Temp Check Number 68 66 Uni-ted-Electric-Co- 68 United Electric Co 02-4330-825-70 236 Totals Temp Check Number 68 Temp. -Check -Number 69 6S P Whltace 6 Co splys splys 01-430Z-070-70 splys 998. 27 41; 930 13299.00 !, ;cc' ,481 !foll 45:21 69 Totals Temp Check Number 69 76.87 76.87 . .591 47 48 Tenip Check Number 70 49 50 51 52 53 54 .51 11'2! 1c- 79-2-legler _Inc 02-4330=490-r50 rimns _els -6-; la, 70 029.65 Ian Totals_lemp_Check_Humber _70 1u..! 166.61 ;70 71- 1 17:4 55 5872 S60,257.18 Brand Total 7 4 74 1;) 2 2 Jan 1991 Claims List Page 22 Fr2 84.67 AM Clty of Mendota Heights Temp Check Number 64 1 Ternp. 2 Check 3 1-4-i--Number-=-Vendor Name a 7 a 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 64 Account -Code _ • _ -•, -- • - Totals Temp Check Number 64 66 Trl Cc,uhty Law Enfc Assn 65 Totals Temp Check Number 02-4404-080-00 65 Temp Check Number 86 02-2210 66 Totals Temp_Check Number66 Temp Check Number 67 25 I126 27 Comments __Amount 1991 dues 45.00 45. 00 4 -41_868 _50 -------- 12c" , 3,0:68.60 ST U 9 West communlcatlons 02-9020 Dec svc 67 U 6 West Communications lti-4920-e6521-set Jan svc 28 29 30 !332 33 34 36 922-99 06.ea 1 134 Totals Temp Check Number 67 37 30 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Temp Check Number 68 66 Uni-ted-Electric-Co- 68 United Electric Co 02-4330-825-70 236 Totals Temp Check Number 68 Temp. -Check -Number 69 6S P Whltace 6 Co splys splys 01-430Z-070-70 splys 998. 27 41; 930 13299.00 !, ;cc' ,481 !foll 45:21 69 Totals Temp Check Number 69 76.87 76.87 . .591 47 48 Tenip Check Number 70 49 50 51 52 53 54 .51 11'2! 1c- 79-2-legler _Inc 02-4330=490-r50 rimns _els -6-; la, 70 029.65 Ian Totals_lemp_Check_Humber _70 1u..! 166.61 ;70 71- 1 17:4 55 5872 S60,257.18 Brand Total 7 4 74 1;) 110 11 112 113 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .124 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 MANUAL CHECKS 12953 27.00 Jim Danielson 12954 38.74 Klayton Eckies 12955 348.00 Clayton Engle 12956 900.00 Bayl Kaiser 12957 3,592.32 SCCU 12958 500.00 Dakota Cty Bank 12959 14,517.36 12960 3,099.24 Commissioner of rev 12961 42,080.19 Payroll a/c 12962 381.44 (.1. S. Post office 12963 '165.00 Terry Blum 1296d 67.00 Northern Dak Ch Comm 12966 54.90_,Jeff Piotraschke 64,771.19 g.T. 1,025,028.37 3 mos ins deducted in error mi reimb pers svcs thru 12/28 Dec svc 12/28 payroll deductions 12/28 w/h 12/28 sit 12/28 net payroll utility postage 1991 clothing allow regr 8j. ) 110 11 112 113 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .124 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 MANUAL CHECKS 12953 27.00 Jim Danielson 12954 38.74 Klayton Eckies 12955 348.00 Clayton Engle 12956 900.00 Bayl Kaiser 12957 3,592.32 SCCU 12958 500.00 Dakota Cty Bank 12959 14,517.36 12960 3,099.24 Commissioner of rev 12961 42,080.19 Payroll a/c 12962 381.44 (.1. S. Post office 12963 '165.00 Terry Blum 1296d 67.00 Northern Dak Ch Comm 12966 54.90_,Jeff Piotraschke 64,771.19 g.T. 1,025,028.37 3 mos ins deducted in error mi reimb pers svcs thru 12/28 Dec svc 12/28 payroll deductions 12/28 w/h 12/28 sit 12/28 net payroll utility postage 1991 clothing allow regr 8j. ) CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 8, 1991 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, January 8, 1991 in the City Hall Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chair John Huber called the meeting to order at 8:20 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Huber, Katz, Damberg, Hunter and Lundeen. Kleinglass and Spicer were excused. Councilmember Jill Smith was present as an observer. Staff members present were Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander and Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 VERBAL UPDATES Commissioner Damberg moved approval of the December 11, 1990 Parks and Recreation minutes. Commissioner Hunter seconded. Chair John Huber requested the verbal updates be provided first. Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander stated that NSP's Community Service Manager, Mr. Bob Schmall, had been contacted regarding landscaped screening around the NSP power station near Mendakota Park. Kullander stated that Mr. Scmall had indicated that NSP was willing to address, and possibly provide, screening to the north of the transfer station, as had been required to the south at the time of their CUP. Staff will provide NSP with a copy of the site plan for Mendakota Park and NSP will propose screening. Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder had indicated that Planning Commissioner Ultan Duggan had requested that staff conduct an inventory of park acreage to compare with the stated goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Batchelder indicated that the preliminary analysis had been completed and that a report would be provided to the Park Commission at their February meeting and then forwarded to the Planning Commission. Batchelder stated that the City Council acknowledged the receipt of a lawsuit from Centex, the developers of Kensington, over the City's failure to approve the requested rezoning. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 8, 1991 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, January 8, 1991 in the City Hall Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. Chair John Huber called the meeting to order at 8:20 o'clock p.m. The following members were present: Huber, Katz, Damberg, Hunter and Lundeen. Kleinglass and Spicer were excused. Councilmember Jill Smith was present as an observer. Staff members present were Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander and Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder. APPROVAL OF MINUTES AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 VERBAL UPDATES Commissioner Damberg moved approval of the December 11, 1990 Parks and Recreation minutes. Commissioner Hunter seconded. Chair John Huber requested the verbal updates be provided first. Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander stated that NSP's Community Service Manager, Mr. Bob Schmall, had been contacted regarding landscaped screening around the NSP power station near Mendakota Park. Kullander stated that Mr. Scmall had indicated that NSP was willing to address, and possibly provide, screening to the north of the transfer station, as had been required to the south at the time of their CUP. Staff will provide NSP with a copy of the site plan for Mendakota Park and NSP will propose screening. Administrative Assistant Kevin Batchelder had indicated that Planning Commissioner Ultan Duggan had requested that staff conduct an inventory of park acreage to compare with the stated goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Batchelder indicated that the preliminary analysis had been completed and that a report would be provided to the Park Commission at their February meeting and then forwarded to the Planning Commission. Batchelder stated that the City Council acknowledged the receipt of a lawsuit from Centex, the developers of Kensington, over the City's failure to approve the requested rezoning. Kullander described the progress of the Mendakota Park design. Kullander stated that Barry Warner was incorporating the Commission's, Council's and staff's suggestions into the design and had run into no problems at that point. Kullander stated the tennis court would be a bid alternate that could be included should the neighborhood decided to dedicate the land and participate in the construction costs. Kullander stated that the Commissioners would be sent copies of the final plan and, if there was agreement, there would be no need for a special meeting to review plans on January 29. Kullander stated that Barton-Aschman had requested a fee increase due to the upgraded status of the Mendakota Park project. Kullander stated that Barton-Aschman had originally requested a percentage based fee increase, but had agreed to go along with a staff time and materials increase to their fee. Kullander stated this matter would be for City Council to decide at their January 15, 1991 meeting. PRIORITY SETTING Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander briefly described the memorandums provided to the Parks and Recreation Commission that outlined unfinished park improvements, their estimated costs and their feasibility. Kullander compared the remaining monies in the referendum to the amount necessary to build Mendakota Park. He stated that approximately $806,000 remained from Question One and that the cost to construct Mendakota Park was estimated by Barton-Aschman to be $785,000. Kullander stated that since the first estimate additional improvements and enhancements have been identified that will raise this estimate beyond $800,000. Kullander stated that staff feels that the referendum has been substantially completed, with the exception of the second ball field site, which is now Mendakota, and the third ballfield complex, which will probably be Kensington plus some minor neighborhood ballfield improvements and some trail segments. Kullander stated that funds to develop the third site were to come from Question Two. Kullander stated that remaining funding for parks improvements was available in Question Two ($700,000) and the Parks Special Fund ($325,000). Kullander stated that the obligations of the referendum were fulfilled, however, some trail segments shown in the map in the referendum brochure may prove impossible to build or too Kullander described the progress of the Mendakota Park design. Kullander stated that Barry Warner was incorporating the Commission's, Council's and staff's suggestions into the design and had run into no problems at that point. Kullander stated the tennis court would be a bid alternate that could be included should the neighborhood decided to dedicate the land and participate in the construction costs. Kullander stated that the Commissioners would be sent copies of the final plan and, if there was agreement, there would be no need for a special meeting to review plans on January 29. Kullander stated that Barton-Aschman had requested a fee increase due to the upgraded status of the Mendakota Park project. Kullander stated that Barton-Aschman had originally requested a percentage based fee increase, but had agreed to go along with a staff time and materials increase to their fee. Kullander stated this matter would be for City Council to decide at their January 15, 1991 meeting. PRIORITY SETTING Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander briefly described the memorandums provided to the Parks and Recreation Commission that outlined unfinished park improvements, their estimated costs and their feasibility. Kullander compared the remaining monies in the referendum to the amount necessary to build Mendakota Park. He stated that approximately $806,000 remained from Question One and that the cost to construct Mendakota Park was estimated by Barton-Aschman to be $785,000. Kullander stated that since the first estimate additional improvements and enhancements have been identified that will raise this estimate beyond $800,000. Kullander stated that staff feels that the referendum has been substantially completed, with the exception of the second ball field site, which is now Mendakota, and the third ballfield complex, which will probably be Kensington plus some minor neighborhood ballfield improvements and some trail segments. Kullander stated that funds to develop the third site were to come from Question Two. Kullander stated that remaining funding for parks improvements was available in Question Two ($700,000) and the Parks Special Fund ($325,000). Kullander stated that the obligations of the referendum were fulfilled, however, some trail segments shown in the map in the referendum brochure may prove impossible to build or too �.5 costly. He stated the remaining major segments of trail would be completed as highway and street projects are undertaken. Kullander stated that his memo outlined all the remaining trail segments and park improvements and he desired the Commission to set priorities for each project so that preliminary cost estimates could be prepared, if necessary. He stated that the funding from Question One will be substantially depleted by the construction of Mendakota Park and that the Commission should set priorities for each project so they can be fulfilled in that order as the remaining funds run out. Chair Huber stated that it boils down to which remaining items are built or not. Kullander stated that the Second Question monies were originally earmarked for land acquisition and development of the third ballfield site (Kensington). Kullander stated that Special Park Fund monies could be used for high priority items. The Commission discussed the budget for Question One. Commissioner Hunter agreed with staff that the obligations of the Question One had been fulfilled. He stated that one item, the Mayfield Heights trail that had been requested by that neighborhood, should be fulfilled if possible. Chair John Huber stated that the Commission should decide what priorities exist and let available money follow it until exhausted. Huber stated that Mendakota Park was priority number one. The Commission concurred. Kullander led the Commission through the list of projects remaining. The Commission identified four trail segments to consider for priority. The Delaware trail from Marie to Highway 110 was declared a medium priority, Dodd Road from Wagon Wheel to South Plaza was declared a medium priority, Mayfield Heights segment was declared a low priority and all MSA funded trail segments were declared low priority. The Commission decided to wait and see on all other trail segments. The Commission discussed the use of Special Parks Fund monies for referendum uses. The Commission asked staff for a report on the fund, the interest it earns, and any recent draws upon the fund. The report would be used to discuss guidelines for use of this money. �.5 costly. He stated the remaining major segments of trail would be completed as highway and street projects are undertaken. Kullander stated that his memo outlined all the remaining trail segments and park improvements and he desired the Commission to set priorities for each project so that preliminary cost estimates could be prepared, if necessary. He stated that the funding from Question One will be substantially depleted by the construction of Mendakota Park and that the Commission should set priorities for each project so they can be fulfilled in that order as the remaining funds run out. Chair Huber stated that it boils down to which remaining items are built or not. Kullander stated that the Second Question monies were originally earmarked for land acquisition and development of the third ballfield site (Kensington). Kullander stated that Special Park Fund monies could be used for high priority items. The Commission discussed the budget for Question One. Commissioner Hunter agreed with staff that the obligations of the Question One had been fulfilled. He stated that one item, the Mayfield Heights trail that had been requested by that neighborhood, should be fulfilled if possible. Chair John Huber stated that the Commission should decide what priorities exist and let available money follow it until exhausted. Huber stated that Mendakota Park was priority number one. The Commission concurred. Kullander led the Commission through the list of projects remaining. The Commission identified four trail segments to consider for priority. The Delaware trail from Marie to Highway 110 was declared a medium priority, Dodd Road from Wagon Wheel to South Plaza was declared a medium priority, Mayfield Heights segment was declared a low priority and all MSA funded trail segments were declared low priority. The Commission decided to wait and see on all other trail segments. The Commission discussed the use of Special Parks Fund monies for referendum uses. The Commission asked staff for a report on the fund, the interest it earns, and any recent draws upon the fund. The report would be used to discuss guidelines for use of this money. The viewing blind at Friendly Marsh park was declared a very low priority as it is repetitive of Dodge Nature activities. The remaining improvements to existing neighborhood park ballfields, estimated at $3,000 to $5,000 was declared to be completed in 1991, as was $1,000 improvements to Curley's Valley View Tot Lot. The bleachers and play equipment at Sibley Park were discussed. The Commission recommended construction of the bleachers in 1991 and recommended waiting for demand on the play equipment construction in Sibley Park. Kullander stated that funding for the two Sibley items had been reserved so that these two items did not impact the remaining funds of $806,000. Commissioner Hunter stated that the City had its foot to the floor on parks construction for the last year and that we should proceed with construction of Mendakota Park, it would be the centerpiece of the parks system. He stated that with construction of Mendakota Park the City should wait until the dust settles to determine what should or can be accomplished as far as the small remaining items. He stated at that point it could be decided if Question Two money could be used for small items, or if the Special Parks Fund could be used for high priority small items. Chair Huber concurred. Commissioner Hunter moved to recommend to City Council that the obligations of the referendum are essentially fulfilled, that Mendakota Park should be constructed according to the preliminary plans and specifications and that staff proceed with trail construction according to the priorities recommended until Question One money was exhausted. Chair Huber seconded. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 ADJOURN There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation Commission adjourned at 9:30 o'clock p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant The viewing blind at Friendly Marsh park was declared a very low priority as it is repetitive of Dodge Nature activities. The remaining improvements to existing neighborhood park ballfields, estimated at $3,000 to $5,000 was declared to be completed in 1991, as was $1,000 improvements to Curley's Valley View Tot Lot. The bleachers and play equipment at Sibley Park were discussed. The Commission recommended construction of the bleachers in 1991 and recommended waiting for demand on the play equipment construction in Sibley Park. Kullander stated that funding for the two Sibley items had been reserved so that these two items did not impact the remaining funds of $806,000. Commissioner Hunter stated that the City had its foot to the floor on parks construction for the last year and that we should proceed with construction of Mendakota Park, it would be the centerpiece of the parks system. He stated that with construction of Mendakota Park the City should wait until the dust settles to determine what should or can be accomplished as far as the small remaining items. He stated at that point it could be decided if Question Two money could be used for small items, or if the Special Parks Fund could be used for high priority small items. Chair Huber concurred. Commissioner Hunter moved to recommend to City Council that the obligations of the referendum are essentially fulfilled, that Mendakota Park should be constructed according to the preliminary plans and specifications and that staff proceed with trail construction according to the priorities recommended until Question One money was exhausted. Chair Huber seconded. AYES: 5 NAYS: 0 ADJOURN There being no further business, the Parks and Recreation Commission adjourned at 9:30 o'clock p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 15, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator SUBJECT: Letter of Resignation - Carol J. Bakka DISCUSSION During the past week, Carol Bakka, Police Secretary, submitted her written resignation to Chief Delmont (see attached). Staff is saddened of her departure, and it will be difficult to fill the position given her many years of experience and dedication. Luckily, Carol has agreed to remain with us until April 1, 1991, in order to allow time to hire and train her replacement. Chief Delmont is currently reviewing the recruitment procedure he desires to employ in choosing Carol's replacement. He intends to finalize the process within the next week and should be in the position to recruit shortly thereafter. ACTION REQUIRED Accept the attached resignation from Police Secretary Carol J. Bakka effective April 1, 1991, and direct staff to begin the recruitment process to fill the vacancy period. MTL:kkb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 15, 1991 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator SUBJECT: Letter of Resignation - Carol J. Bakka DISCUSSION During the past week, Carol Bakka, Police Secretary, submitted her written resignation to Chief Delmont (see attached). Staff is saddened of her departure, and it will be difficult to fill the position given her many years of experience and dedication. Luckily, Carol has agreed to remain with us until April 1, 1991, in order to allow time to hire and train her replacement. Chief Delmont is currently reviewing the recruitment procedure he desires to employ in choosing Carol's replacement. He intends to finalize the process within the next week and should be in the position to recruit shortly thereafter. ACTION REQUIRED Accept the attached resignation from Police Secretary Carol J. Bakka effective April 1, 1991, and direct staff to begin the recruitment process to fill the vacancy period. MTL:kkb January 7, 1991 Chief Dennis Delmont Mendota Heights Police Department 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Chief Delmont: Please accept this letter as my resignation effective April 1, 1991. I am advising you of my resignation at this time in order to provide ample time for a smooth transition. At this point in time I do not plan to pursue my career. I would, however, appreciate a letter of recommendation from you in the event I should decide to seek employment in the future. After twelve years with the City I have made many wonderful friends and have experienced many unique situations. Therefore, the decision to resign was very difficult, but one that had to be made at this time. Sincerely, Carol J. Bakka, Police Secretary CB/ January 7, 1991 Chief Dennis Delmont Mendota Heights Police Department 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Chief Delmont: Please accept this letter as my resignation effective April 1, 1991. I am advising you of my resignation at this time in order to provide ample time for a smooth transition. At this point in time I do not plan to pursue my career. I would, however, appreciate a letter of recommendation from you in the event I should decide to seek employment in the future. After twelve years with the City I have made many wonderful friends and have experienced many unique situations. Therefore, the decision to resign was very difficult, but one that had to be made at this time. Sincerely, Carol J. Bakka, Police Secretary CB/ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 10 1991 To: Mayor, City Council and City Admin From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista Subject: DISCUSSION Con -Spec - MIST Conditional Use Permit Continued Public Hearing Planning Case No. 90-26 At the September 4, 1990 City Council meeting, Minnesota Indoor Soccer and Training (MIST) asked that the Council continue their public hearing until Jan. 15, 1991 in order to allow them time to secure financing for their proposed indoor soccer arena. Council granted that request. Staff has learned that financing for the indoor soccer arena was not obtained and that Jerry Haarmann, the original project petitioner, is no longer associated with MIST. Apparently, MIST had been depending upon the sale of land to Batesville Casket at the Northland Drive site in order to secure financing for the soccer building. Batesville Casket pulled out of the Northland Drive site when a large amount of un -engineered fill was discovered on the property as a result of I-494 construction. I recommend that City Council re -open the continued hearing for the purpose of formally closing the public hearing, thus concluding action on Planning Case No. 90-26. ACTION REQUIRED If the City Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should pass a motion closing the public hearing which will conclude action on Planning Case No. 90-26. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO January 10 1991 To: Mayor, City Council and City Admin From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative Assista Subject: DISCUSSION Con -Spec - MIST Conditional Use Permit Continued Public Hearing Planning Case No. 90-26 At the September 4, 1990 City Council meeting, Minnesota Indoor Soccer and Training (MIST) asked that the Council continue their public hearing until Jan. 15, 1991 in order to allow them time to secure financing for their proposed indoor soccer arena. Council granted that request. Staff has learned that financing for the indoor soccer arena was not obtained and that Jerry Haarmann, the original project petitioner, is no longer associated with MIST. Apparently, MIST had been depending upon the sale of land to Batesville Casket at the Northland Drive site in order to secure financing for the soccer building. Batesville Casket pulled out of the Northland Drive site when a large amount of un -engineered fill was discovered on the property as a result of I-494 construction. I recommend that City Council re -open the continued hearing for the purpose of formally closing the public hearing, thus concluding action on Planning Case No. 90-26. ACTION REQUIRED If the City Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should pass a motion closing the public hearing which will conclude action on Planning Case No. 90-26. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin FROM: James E. Daniels Public Works Di SUBJECT: Conspec - MIST CZ.itiona1 Use Permit DISCUSSION: August 29, 1990 A public hearing to consider a request from MIST was continued from the August 7th City Council meeting to allow time for MIST to work on some problems with their financing. MIST still has not been able to secure financing and asks that the matter be continued to January 15, 1991. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Developer's request they should pass a motion continuing the public hearing until 8:00 P.M., January 15, 1991. JED: dfw (ovt4-lin.rec.9 3 -O CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin FROM: James E. Daniels Public Works Di SUBJECT: Conspec - MIST CZ.itiona1 Use Permit DISCUSSION: August 29, 1990 A public hearing to consider a request from MIST was continued from the August 7th City Council meeting to allow time for MIST to work on some problems with their financing. MIST still has not been able to secure financing and asks that the matter be continued to January 15, 1991. ACTION REOUIRED: If Council desires to implement the Developer's request they should pass a motion continuing the public hearing until 8:00 P.M., January 15, 1991. JED: dfw (ovt4-lin.rec.9 3 -O CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: James E. Da Public Wo January 10, 1991 and Kevin Batcheld ctor Administrative SUBJECT: Solvay Ph II II - Building Permit INTRODUCTION: In 1989 United Properties came to an agreement with Solvay Animal Health, Inc. to construct a new 60,000 square foot corporate head- quarters and veterinary medicine research company at the intersection of Northland Drive and Executive Drive. At that time United Proper- ties processed a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the entire block that included two lots that were ultimately intended to be a campus type development. This current proposal is Phase II of that previously approved Planned Unit Development. Phase I building permit approval was approved by City Council in advance of any Planning Commission consideration. United Properties later applied for the Planned Unit Development and replatting with Planning Commission review and approval. United Properties has promised a September 1, 1991 occupancy date to Solvay for Phase II and desires to proceed in the same fashion as was done in Phase I in order to fast track. DISCUSSION: Phase II of Solvay is a 30,000 square foot freestanding pharma- ceutical laboratory that is proposed to match the exterior design of Phase I (see attached letter and plans). Because of the platting of a lot and P.U.D. amendments, the United Properties must appear for public hearings at the January 22, 1991 Planning Commission and the February 5, 1991 City Council meetings. United Properties is appearing on tonight's agenda to discuss foundation and building permit approvals prior to the scheduled public hearings in order to meet their short deadlines for building occupan- cy. Variances to parking, sign setback and building setbacks similar to previous United Properties projects are proposed and will be con- sidered during the public hearings. RECOMMENDATION: Currently the Solvay Planned Unit Development has an existing lot that is buildable and conforms to all Industrial Zone minimum require- ments. We recommend that a building permit be authorized this evening with future confirmation of the Minor P.U.D. amendment that includes variances for building setback, parking stall size, parking ration and sign setback at the February 5th City Council meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: Meet with applicant. If City Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing staff to issue the btri ng permit. JED/KB:dfw CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: James E. Da Public Wo January 10, 1991 and Kevin Batcheld ctor Administrative SUBJECT: Solvay Ph II II - Building Permit INTRODUCTION: In 1989 United Properties came to an agreement with Solvay Animal Health, Inc. to construct a new 60,000 square foot corporate head- quarters and veterinary medicine research company at the intersection of Northland Drive and Executive Drive. At that time United Proper- ties processed a Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) for the entire block that included two lots that were ultimately intended to be a campus type development. This current proposal is Phase II of that previously approved Planned Unit Development. Phase I building permit approval was approved by City Council in advance of any Planning Commission consideration. United Properties later applied for the Planned Unit Development and replatting with Planning Commission review and approval. United Properties has promised a September 1, 1991 occupancy date to Solvay for Phase II and desires to proceed in the same fashion as was done in Phase I in order to fast track. DISCUSSION: Phase II of Solvay is a 30,000 square foot freestanding pharma- ceutical laboratory that is proposed to match the exterior design of Phase I (see attached letter and plans). Because of the platting of a lot and P.U.D. amendments, the United Properties must appear for public hearings at the January 22, 1991 Planning Commission and the February 5, 1991 City Council meetings. United Properties is appearing on tonight's agenda to discuss foundation and building permit approvals prior to the scheduled public hearings in order to meet their short deadlines for building occupan- cy. Variances to parking, sign setback and building setbacks similar to previous United Properties projects are proposed and will be con- sidered during the public hearings. RECOMMENDATION: Currently the Solvay Planned Unit Development has an existing lot that is buildable and conforms to all Industrial Zone minimum require- ments. We recommend that a building permit be authorized this evening with future confirmation of the Minor P.U.D. amendment that includes variances for building setback, parking stall size, parking ration and sign setback at the February 5th City Council meeting. ACTION REQUIRED: Meet with applicant. If City Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion authorizing staff to issue the btri ng permit. JED/KB:dfw v UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY January 10, 1990 Mr. Thomas Lawell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Solvay Animal Health, Inc. Phase II - Pharmaceutical Building Mendota Heights Business Park Dear Tom: United Properties Development Company requests the approval of the City of Mendota Heights for an amendment of the existing PUD and a building permit subject to staff's approval of final plans and specifications for a new pharmaceutical building for Solvay Animal Health, Inc. in the Mendota Heights Business Park. We have included 20 reduced copies of the site plan, building elevation, floor plan and a preliminary landscape concept plan for the referenced project, and 20 full size copies of the Preliminary Plat. The subject will be located on approximately 3.77 acres of land at the southeast corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive Drive. The architectural design of this building will include the same brick and glass materials we used on the adjacent Phase I building. The building will consist of approximately 30,000 square feet of building area. Solvay Animal Health, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of animal vaccines worldwide, chose the Mendota Heights Business Park for its corporate headquarters location in 1989. The use of the new building will be a pharmaceutical laboratory, containing both analytical labs and formulation labs. Small quantities will be tested and manufactured in this new facility. However, primary manufacturing will be done off site in manufacturing facilities like the one they have in Charles City, Iowa. Hazardous materials are limited to the chemicals used within the labs which are standard laboratory solutions. The new building will eventually house approximately 50 employees. Solvay Animal Health, Inc. is a subsidiary of the Solvay Group, headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. 3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 (612) 831-1000 v UNITED PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY January 10, 1990 Mr. Thomas Lawell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Solvay Animal Health, Inc. Phase II - Pharmaceutical Building Mendota Heights Business Park Dear Tom: United Properties Development Company requests the approval of the City of Mendota Heights for an amendment of the existing PUD and a building permit subject to staff's approval of final plans and specifications for a new pharmaceutical building for Solvay Animal Health, Inc. in the Mendota Heights Business Park. We have included 20 reduced copies of the site plan, building elevation, floor plan and a preliminary landscape concept plan for the referenced project, and 20 full size copies of the Preliminary Plat. The subject will be located on approximately 3.77 acres of land at the southeast corner of Mendota Heights Road and Executive Drive. The architectural design of this building will include the same brick and glass materials we used on the adjacent Phase I building. The building will consist of approximately 30,000 square feet of building area. Solvay Animal Health, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of animal vaccines worldwide, chose the Mendota Heights Business Park for its corporate headquarters location in 1989. The use of the new building will be a pharmaceutical laboratory, containing both analytical labs and formulation labs. Small quantities will be tested and manufactured in this new facility. However, primary manufacturing will be done off site in manufacturing facilities like the one they have in Charles City, Iowa. Hazardous materials are limited to the chemicals used within the labs which are standard laboratory solutions. The new building will eventually house approximately 50 employees. Solvay Animal Health, Inc. is a subsidiary of the Solvay Group, headquartered in Brussels, Belgium. 3500 West 80th Street Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55431 (612) 831-1000 Mr. Thomas Lawell Page 2 January 10, 1990 Time is of an essence for this project which is being developed on a fast track basis for a September 1 occupancy. On staff's recommendation, we are applying for a building permit on the basis of splitting lot 2 of block 1. Once we are underway, we will immediately follow-up with a PUD amendment to accomodate the lot split. Additionally, we will request four variances: for setback; for a 4 per 1,000 square feet of office area parking ratio for purposes of calculating the number of needed parking spaces; an 8'6" parking stall width; and a twenty foot tenant identification signage setback, all of which have been previously approved by you for the Mendota Heights Business Center, Southridge Business Center, Northland Insurance Company Building, Solvay, Big Wheel, and the recently approved Fisery project. Our desire is for the PUD zoning to allow for common lot lines and shared parking, site access and circulation. We respectfully ask your approval of these requests. Sincerely, Dale J. Gl�wa Senior Vice President DJG/ktb Mr. Thomas Lawell Page 2 January 10, 1990 Time is of an essence for this project which is being developed on a fast track basis for a September 1 occupancy. On staff's recommendation, we are applying for a building permit on the basis of splitting lot 2 of block 1. Once we are underway, we will immediately follow-up with a PUD amendment to accomodate the lot split. Additionally, we will request four variances: for setback; for a 4 per 1,000 square feet of office area parking ratio for purposes of calculating the number of needed parking spaces; an 8'6" parking stall width; and a twenty foot tenant identification signage setback, all of which have been previously approved by you for the Mendota Heights Business Center, Southridge Business Center, Northland Insurance Company Building, Solvay, Big Wheel, and the recently approved Fisery project. Our desire is for the PUD zoning to allow for common lot lines and shared parking, site access and circulation. We respectfully ask your approval of these requests. Sincerely, Dale J. Gl�wa Senior Vice President DJG/ktb CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: James E. Dani so Public Works Dire SUBJECT: Street Light Requests INTRODUCTION: January 10, 1991 Periodically staff receives requests for street lights. Because the City has no formal street light policy these requests are brought to the City Council for individual review on a case by case basis (attached is a proposed street light policy drafted in 1989 but never adopted). DISCUSSION: Recently staff has received two requests for street lights: 1. A letter from Mr. Mike Reynolds for Huber Drive (see at- tached). 2. A phone request from Mr. Dick Leyh for Marie Avenue at Eagle Ridge Drive. Both of these requests are for lights along what would be desig- nated as thoroughfare streets. These streets are also Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets and MSA will fund street lights at intersections. Options 1. Do nothing, deny the requests. 2. Install NSP type lights. In this alternative NSP will install the lights at no initial cost to the City if there is an existing pole and power available. If there is not, the City will then be charged installation costs and of course the monthly billing for rental. 3. Install an ornamental light. I would suggest that the same light that is now being used within the City's Industrial Park could be used as the City standard light on all thor- oughfare streets. Estimated costs for installing these lights is approximately $3,000 per unit. An electric meter is then installed and the City receives a monthly utility bill for the electricity used. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis FROM: James E. Dani so Public Works Dire SUBJECT: Street Light Requests INTRODUCTION: January 10, 1991 Periodically staff receives requests for street lights. Because the City has no formal street light policy these requests are brought to the City Council for individual review on a case by case basis (attached is a proposed street light policy drafted in 1989 but never adopted). DISCUSSION: Recently staff has received two requests for street lights: 1. A letter from Mr. Mike Reynolds for Huber Drive (see at- tached). 2. A phone request from Mr. Dick Leyh for Marie Avenue at Eagle Ridge Drive. Both of these requests are for lights along what would be desig- nated as thoroughfare streets. These streets are also Municipal State Aid (MSA) streets and MSA will fund street lights at intersections. Options 1. Do nothing, deny the requests. 2. Install NSP type lights. In this alternative NSP will install the lights at no initial cost to the City if there is an existing pole and power available. If there is not, the City will then be charged installation costs and of course the monthly billing for rental. 3. Install an ornamental light. I would suggest that the same light that is now being used within the City's Industrial Park could be used as the City standard light on all thor- oughfare streets. Estimated costs for installing these lights is approximately $3,000 per unit. An electric meter is then installed and the City receives a monthly utility bill for the electricity used. Funding: It has been the City's past practice to fund street lights locat- ed along thoroughfares in residential areas out of the general fund. To date all City street lights within the residential areas have been NSP lights with no installation costs, only monthly rental costs. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the requests and determine a course of action. JED:dfw Funding: It has been the City's past practice to fund street lights locat- ed along thoroughfares in residential areas out of the general fund. To date all City street lights within the residential areas have been NSP lights with no installation costs, only monthly rental costs. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the requests and determine a course of action. JED:dfw November 27, 1990 Mr. Tom Lawell, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Lawell, I would like a motion put before the City Council that addresses the fact that there are no street lights along Huber Drive from Delaware to Mendota Heights Road. This is a fairly heavily traveled stretch of road,given the construction of numerous homes in the area during the past five years. Over the past year, two automobiles (at night) have failed to negotiate the curve on Huber Drive (where it intersects with Cheyenne) and have ended up in peoples backyards, causing extensive property damage but, fortunately as yet, no injuries or deaths. Also, streetlights would be both sensible and useful since there is a blacktopped walking path alongside of Huber Drive, which is used extensively by area residents both day and night. To summarize, please consider the motion to erect streetlights at intersections along the length of Huber Drive. Respectfully, At Michael Reynolds C� Michael Reynolds 2286 Nashua Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 November 27, 1990 Mr. Tom Lawell, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Lawell, I would like a motion put before the City Council that addresses the fact that there are no street lights along Huber Drive from Delaware to Mendota Heights Road. This is a fairly heavily traveled stretch of road,given the construction of numerous homes in the area during the past five years. Over the past year, two automobiles (at night) have failed to negotiate the curve on Huber Drive (where it intersects with Cheyenne) and have ended up in peoples backyards, causing extensive property damage but, fortunately as yet, no injuries or deaths. Also, streetlights would be both sensible and useful since there is a blacktopped walking path alongside of Huber Drive, which is used extensively by area residents both day and night. To summarize, please consider the motion to erect streetlights at intersections along the length of Huber Drive. Respectfully, At Michael Reynolds C� Michael Reynolds 2286 Nashua Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 MEMO Date: February 1, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council, and CitytIator FROM: James E. Danielson, SUBJECT: Street Lighting DISCUSSION: City Engineer The issue of street lighting was discussed by the Council last November and December when Centex Homes requested that street lights be installed within their development. Council delayed action on Centex's request at that time, and directed staff to prepare a street light policy statement for their consideration. Staff has prepared the following street light policy statement for Council Review: STREET LIGHTING POLICY SYSTEM: COMMERCIAL STREET LIGHTS: Street lights will be installed in all newly developing commercial areas and in any established areas upon receipt of a petition from the landowners or as directed by the City Council. The pole and fixture design will be as follows: Luminaire= Sterner Executive 25 w/400 Watt HPS light Pole= 30 foot high square tapered metal pole THOROUGHFARE LIGHTS: Thoroughfare street lights will be 'installed along thoroughfare streets at all appropriate intersections. Thoroughfare streets are defined as all State Trunk Highways, County Roads and City MSA Streets. Pole and fixture design will be as follows: (to be determined). A schedule for converting the City to the new pole and fixtures design will be established. RESIDENTIAL LIGHTS: Residential street lights will be allowed within the neighborhoods when petitioned for by the neighborhood. Lights will not be installed on a petition from a developer. Pole and fixture design will be as follows: (to be determined). Public hearings will be held to inform affected residents as required by Chapter 429 the public improvement process. After the City receives a petition the City Engineer prepares a feasibility report addressing the technical feasibility and costs and then a public hearing is held. MEMO Date: February 1, 1989 TO: Mayor, City Council, and CitytIator FROM: James E. Danielson, SUBJECT: Street Lighting DISCUSSION: City Engineer The issue of street lighting was discussed by the Council last November and December when Centex Homes requested that street lights be installed within their development. Council delayed action on Centex's request at that time, and directed staff to prepare a street light policy statement for their consideration. Staff has prepared the following street light policy statement for Council Review: STREET LIGHTING POLICY SYSTEM: COMMERCIAL STREET LIGHTS: Street lights will be installed in all newly developing commercial areas and in any established areas upon receipt of a petition from the landowners or as directed by the City Council. The pole and fixture design will be as follows: Luminaire= Sterner Executive 25 w/400 Watt HPS light Pole= 30 foot high square tapered metal pole THOROUGHFARE LIGHTS: Thoroughfare street lights will be 'installed along thoroughfare streets at all appropriate intersections. Thoroughfare streets are defined as all State Trunk Highways, County Roads and City MSA Streets. Pole and fixture design will be as follows: (to be determined). A schedule for converting the City to the new pole and fixtures design will be established. RESIDENTIAL LIGHTS: Residential street lights will be allowed within the neighborhoods when petitioned for by the neighborhood. Lights will not be installed on a petition from a developer. Pole and fixture design will be as follows: (to be determined). Public hearings will be held to inform affected residents as required by Chapter 429 the public improvement process. After the City receives a petition the City Engineer prepares a feasibility report addressing the technical feasibility and costs and then a public hearing is held. FUNDING: COMMERCIAL STREET LIGHTS: Commercial be installed by the City and costs for the be assessed to all properties abutting the based on an area and frontage calculation. operation and maintenance will be by a tax commercial lighting district. street lights will construction will street lights Costs for the levy within the THOROUGHFARE LIGHTS: City Standard thoroughfare lights will be installed at all appropriate intersections with all costs for the construction, operation and maintenance to be funded by the City's general fund. A plan for installation will be included in the City's five-year capital improvements budget. Actual installation will be subject to annual budget appropriations by the City Council. Alternative: To expedite installation of thoroughfare lights, Council might consider submitting the question to voters as a bond referendum. There are approximately 90 street intersection locations along thoroughfares that either have existing NSP lights, to be replaced with the City designed lights, or have no lights and need to be lit. At approximately $3000/light an off the cuff estimate of total costs would be $300K. NEIGHBORHOOD LIGHTS: Construction costs for street lights within a neighborhood will be assessed to the benefitting neighborhood equally to each single family unit or by front footage. If assessments would be by each single family unit, non -single family sites, ie, churches, would have to be converted to equivalent single family units. Operation and maintenance costs will be billed equally to each single family unit quarterly on their utility bills. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the above proposed street light policy and give staff direction on any changes desired. A resolution incorporating the preferred policies will then be drafted and submitted to Council for adoption at a future meeting. As time allows, the committee of staff, Mayor Mertensotto and Councilmember Hartmann will present a recommended light standard. FUNDING: COMMERCIAL STREET LIGHTS: Commercial be installed by the City and costs for the be assessed to all properties abutting the based on an area and frontage calculation. operation and maintenance will be by a tax commercial lighting district. street lights will construction will street lights Costs for the levy within the THOROUGHFARE LIGHTS: City Standard thoroughfare lights will be installed at all appropriate intersections with all costs for the construction, operation and maintenance to be funded by the City's general fund. A plan for installation will be included in the City's five-year capital improvements budget. Actual installation will be subject to annual budget appropriations by the City Council. Alternative: To expedite installation of thoroughfare lights, Council might consider submitting the question to voters as a bond referendum. There are approximately 90 street intersection locations along thoroughfares that either have existing NSP lights, to be replaced with the City designed lights, or have no lights and need to be lit. At approximately $3000/light an off the cuff estimate of total costs would be $300K. NEIGHBORHOOD LIGHTS: Construction costs for street lights within a neighborhood will be assessed to the benefitting neighborhood equally to each single family unit or by front footage. If assessments would be by each single family unit, non -single family sites, ie, churches, would have to be converted to equivalent single family units. Operation and maintenance costs will be billed equally to each single family unit quarterly on their utility bills. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the above proposed street light policy and give staff direction on any changes desired. A resolution incorporating the preferred policies will then be drafted and submitted to Council for adoption at a future meeting. As time allows, the committee of staff, Mayor Mertensotto and Councilmember Hartmann will present a recommended light standard. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Adminis FROM: Klayton H. Eckies Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Update on Furlong Area Improvements Job No. 8616 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 4 January 9, 1991 INTRODUCTION The engineering staff has spent the last two months working to complete plans and specifications for the Furlong Area Improvement Project. Although the project got of to a late start, things are progressing quite smoothly at this point. Given the new Council and some recent developments, it seems that this is a good time for a progress report. This memo will discuss the current status of the project, some recent developments with HRA funding, and will request Council approval of Staff's proposal to acquire easements. DISCUSSION Currently Staff is preparing plans and specifications, and negotiating easements. To date the sanitary sewer design is 90% complete, the watermain and storm sewer design are approximately 60% complete. Drafting of the plans is half done, and specifications have yet to be started. All told the engineering department has accumulated approximately $40,000 in design costs to date. The myriad of studies and reports on this area over the years have generated about $27,000 in engineering charges. The final engineering costs should not be out of line for a project of this size. The time line for completion developed back in July of 1990 looks to be "do -able", barring any surprises. The time line should go something like this: TASK Plans & Specifications Open bids Assessment Hearing Award project Complete construction Certify Assessments COMPLETION March 1, 1991 March 22, 1991 April 16, 1991 April 16, 1991 September 1, 1991 September 15, 1991 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Adminis FROM: Klayton H. Eckies Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Update on Furlong Area Improvements Job No. 8616 Improvement No. 86, Project No. 4 January 9, 1991 INTRODUCTION The engineering staff has spent the last two months working to complete plans and specifications for the Furlong Area Improvement Project. Although the project got of to a late start, things are progressing quite smoothly at this point. Given the new Council and some recent developments, it seems that this is a good time for a progress report. This memo will discuss the current status of the project, some recent developments with HRA funding, and will request Council approval of Staff's proposal to acquire easements. DISCUSSION Currently Staff is preparing plans and specifications, and negotiating easements. To date the sanitary sewer design is 90% complete, the watermain and storm sewer design are approximately 60% complete. Drafting of the plans is half done, and specifications have yet to be started. All told the engineering department has accumulated approximately $40,000 in design costs to date. The myriad of studies and reports on this area over the years have generated about $27,000 in engineering charges. The final engineering costs should not be out of line for a project of this size. The time line for completion developed back in July of 1990 looks to be "do -able", barring any surprises. The time line should go something like this: TASK Plans & Specifications Open bids Assessment Hearing Award project Complete construction Certify Assessments COMPLETION March 1, 1991 March 22, 1991 April 16, 1991 April 16, 1991 September 1, 1991 September 15, 1991 Another development concerning this project is the HRA funding program for which the city has applied. Dakota County is currently reviewing our application for the use of HRA funds to help offset some of the assessments to properties in the project area. It appears that there will be approximately $100,000 available, which could be used to pay off assessments to low income households, and reduce the assessments to moderate income households. We should know more about this program in a few weeks. The last issue to be discussed in this memo concerns easement acquisitions in the project area. In the past four weeks Staff has met with most of those property owners where easements are required, and agreements have been worked out, subject to Council approval. Before meeting with any property owners, Staff developed an easement compensation program to be implemented across the project area. The program follows our standard procedure of paying for easements based on the damages and square footage of the easement. The object of the program is to accomplish two goals --maintain uniformity and fairness between all properties, and avoid the need to go to condemnation. To date the strategy has been very effective, and it appears that no condemnations will be necessary. So far property owners of eleven of the thirteen properties where easements are needed have given verbal acceptance of the City compensation offers. Staff has completed the paperwork on the eight easements listed below: PROPERTY OWNER John Heyn Ronald Pfau Jerome Lane Eleanore Bredvold James & Mary Schwartz Bob & Mary Tousignant Alton & Agnes Berskow Mel & Margaret Koppen TOTAL EASEMENT AND DAMAGE $2,456 $2,534 $1,192 $ 650 $ 645 + easement vacation $ 0 + right of way vacation $2,253 $2,034 4 The Schwartz parcel has a 100' easement already on it which the city acquired in 1984 in anticipation of this project. Unfortunately the new sewer route requires a different easement, so it is proposed that the city vacate the old easement in exchange for the new one. Therefore staff recommends that council hold a public hearing to consider vacation of the old easement at a later date. The Tousignant agreement involves the trading of an easement for right of way which the city isn't using and has no foreseeable future need (in fact the Tousignant house is Another development concerning this project is the HRA funding program for which the city has applied. Dakota County is currently reviewing our application for the use of HRA funds to help offset some of the assessments to properties in the project area. It appears that there will be approximately $100,000 available, which could be used to pay off assessments to low income households, and reduce the assessments to moderate income households. We should know more about this program in a few weeks. The last issue to be discussed in this memo concerns easement acquisitions in the project area. In the past four weeks Staff has met with most of those property owners where easements are required, and agreements have been worked out, subject to Council approval. Before meeting with any property owners, Staff developed an easement compensation program to be implemented across the project area. The program follows our standard procedure of paying for easements based on the damages and square footage of the easement. The object of the program is to accomplish two goals --maintain uniformity and fairness between all properties, and avoid the need to go to condemnation. To date the strategy has been very effective, and it appears that no condemnations will be necessary. So far property owners of eleven of the thirteen properties where easements are needed have given verbal acceptance of the City compensation offers. Staff has completed the paperwork on the eight easements listed below: PROPERTY OWNER John Heyn Ronald Pfau Jerome Lane Eleanore Bredvold James & Mary Schwartz Bob & Mary Tousignant Alton & Agnes Berskow Mel & Margaret Koppen TOTAL EASEMENT AND DAMAGE $2,456 $2,534 $1,192 $ 650 $ 645 + easement vacation $ 0 + right of way vacation $2,253 $2,034 4 The Schwartz parcel has a 100' easement already on it which the city acquired in 1984 in anticipation of this project. Unfortunately the new sewer route requires a different easement, so it is proposed that the city vacate the old easement in exchange for the new one. Therefore staff recommends that council hold a public hearing to consider vacation of the old easement at a later date. The Tousignant agreement involves the trading of an easement for right of way which the city isn't using and has no foreseeable future need (in fact the Tousignant house is encroaching on the right of way). Vacating the right of way after the project is completed would bring the Tousignant house into compliance with city set -back ordinances. RECOMMENDATION I recommend Council approve the payments listed above for easement acquisition and damages (actual fund expenditure to take place after the project is awarded). I also recommend Council direct Staff to prepare easement and right of way vacation hearings for the Schwartz and Tousignant properties after the project is complete. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the recommendation Council should pass a motion approving the expenditure of funds for easement acquisitions listed above, and ordering Staff to prepare hearings on easement and right of way vacations to be held after the Furlong Area Utilities Project is complete. encroaching on the right of way). Vacating the right of way after the project is completed would bring the Tousignant house into compliance with city set -back ordinances. RECOMMENDATION I recommend Council approve the payments listed above for easement acquisition and damages (actual fund expenditure to take place after the project is awarded). I also recommend Council direct Staff to prepare easement and right of way vacation hearings for the Schwartz and Tousignant properties after the project is complete. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs with the recommendation Council should pass a motion approving the expenditure of funds for easement acquisitions listed above, and ordering Staff to prepare hearings on easement and right of way vacations to be held after the Furlong Area Utilities Project is complete. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ FROM: James E. Daniel Public Works Dir SUBJECT: Mn/DOT Release of Right -of -Way DISCUSSION: Excess January 9, 1991 Trunk Highway 149 As a result of some development proposals and traffic problems at the Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road) Trunk Highway 110 intersection, the City established a task force in 1984 to address solutions. The main consideration being the vacant right-of-way corridor located east of existing Trunk Highway 149. This right-of-way had been acquired by Mn/DOT some 35 years ago, before the Interstate Program to provide a major North/South route for traffic to access the City of St. Paul. Since the acquisition and construction of I -35E, Mn/DOT feels the need for the construction of a second major N/S route is not there. The task force came up with 13 recommendations (see attached minutes) that were presented to the City Council at a special workshop meeting, January 29, 1985. Because the development proposals died and because the incidents of accidents were greatly reduced after the opening of 1-494, the impetus to do something waned and no further action has occurred on the proposal since. Recently Council also authorized staff to prepare a feasibility study investigating the possibility of completing some improvements to Dodd Road at its intersection with Trunk Highway 149 and to the access into the shopping center. This feasibility study was ordered as a result of a request from Mr. Ed Paster, the shopping center owner, with a promise from Mn/DOT to fund most of the improvement. As a requirement for Mn/DOT's participation, they asked for the City's cooperation in attempting to release the unused right-of-way for Trunk Highway 149 corridor. Mn/DOT is currently working towards releasing the vacant Trunk Highway 149 and has sent the attached notice of their first action. ACTION REQUIRED: For Council information/comment. JED:dfw CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administ FROM: James E. Daniel Public Works Dir SUBJECT: Mn/DOT Release of Right -of -Way DISCUSSION: Excess January 9, 1991 Trunk Highway 149 As a result of some development proposals and traffic problems at the Trunk Highway 149 (Dodd Road) Trunk Highway 110 intersection, the City established a task force in 1984 to address solutions. The main consideration being the vacant right-of-way corridor located east of existing Trunk Highway 149. This right-of-way had been acquired by Mn/DOT some 35 years ago, before the Interstate Program to provide a major North/South route for traffic to access the City of St. Paul. Since the acquisition and construction of I -35E, Mn/DOT feels the need for the construction of a second major N/S route is not there. The task force came up with 13 recommendations (see attached minutes) that were presented to the City Council at a special workshop meeting, January 29, 1985. Because the development proposals died and because the incidents of accidents were greatly reduced after the opening of 1-494, the impetus to do something waned and no further action has occurred on the proposal since. Recently Council also authorized staff to prepare a feasibility study investigating the possibility of completing some improvements to Dodd Road at its intersection with Trunk Highway 149 and to the access into the shopping center. This feasibility study was ordered as a result of a request from Mr. Ed Paster, the shopping center owner, with a promise from Mn/DOT to fund most of the improvement. As a requirement for Mn/DOT's participation, they asked for the City's cooperation in attempting to release the unused right-of-way for Trunk Highway 149 corridor. Mn/DOT is currently working towards releasing the vacant Trunk Highway 149 and has sent the attached notice of their first action. ACTION REQUIRED: For Council information/comment. JED:dfw to.N"meq Minnesota Department of Transportation 0( DI - n a rOF TFIP� Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota .55477 Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 December 28, 1990 ^'' Mr. Jim Danielson Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Mr. Danielson: Reply to Oakdale Office Telephone No 779-1163 rti. i� off%r'' SUBJECT: S.P. 1917(49=1)901 NE Quadrant at the Intersection of Trunk Highways Numbered 110 and 149 This letter is to inform you of the impending reconveyance of the subject parcel outlined in red on the attached maps. It is Mn/DOT's understanding that the City of Mendota Heights is no longer interested in the subject lands, therefore,we are actively pursuing the reconveyance requested by the fee owner, Mr. Brian L. Birch. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Axel Ridell, from my office, at 779-1217. ncerely, A.eel Z. Lari, P.E. District Right of Way Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer S to.N"meq Minnesota Department of Transportation 0( DI - n a rOF TFIP� Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128 Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota .55477 Metropolitan District Transportation Building St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 December 28, 1990 ^'' Mr. Jim Danielson Director of Public Works City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55120 Dear Mr. Danielson: Reply to Oakdale Office Telephone No 779-1163 rti. i� off%r'' SUBJECT: S.P. 1917(49=1)901 NE Quadrant at the Intersection of Trunk Highways Numbered 110 and 149 This letter is to inform you of the impending reconveyance of the subject parcel outlined in red on the attached maps. It is Mn/DOT's understanding that the City of Mendota Heights is no longer interested in the subject lands, therefore,we are actively pursuing the reconveyance requested by the fee owner, Mr. Brian L. Birch. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Axel Ridell, from my office, at 779-1217. ncerely, A.eel Z. Lari, P.E. District Right of Way Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer S ,. • • • tit r �. ;1-.21"' s•• �'� • r,t�fe .'� r ..,'. • r •. • ',• ''{'/\S'".+vw'..th.ve�•. fie'!./r rn•• ill li:t•.f`.f'irL•:f:{•:r - �•+.ei''AW.:Y:.1JyM•W1•i:i�:�•xI.;AY.ysn�.^.._ 1.. /. ,7• • �.a 1 r•7f} 1040. Plow, r •` 1♦.1 tM1f .0 efts rats Area -'tatioi�! Pure pati tea's'•. •\ 'k'\ agitts;Sall‘4;:. \6441 ;\ \ lazaend ota. •�'>�l':-�-' \\Ni:1‘4\&\‘ dit\\ Southp %')" hopping Cente entist It 8 -0,4 \t\k\c‘ \\V* 7. '�: '�?r»'ant ' �� • �-:, �;,�:�,s/ . tOS :ri 1! w .,ffssfgit'S‘ t , •*,.*,.4, N�� ‘` \`� '''pity �` Pro e �1,'_ _._ - - _ .: CITY aF TA .. .c_4 NE�GHTS "...''; STH .Iw. c - :ra r%-4 • `, a `* Church ;� J: ti' �- '. ,r 44. c °dge'Na.0 ` - tr et Fres rvxe i e ...11 ;I 'VC? ft 1 :11•J\-• • t.'� �..-.•x 3 ft ' (/..,.. Central t f' cam Area'mercxal ,. • • • tit r �. ;1-.21"' s•• �'� • r,t�fe .'� r ..,'. • r •. • ',• ''{'/\S'".+vw'..th.ve�•. fie'!./r rn•• ill li:t•.f`.f'irL•:f:{•:r - �•+.ei''AW.:Y:.1JyM•W1•i:i�:�•xI.;AY.ysn�.^.._ 1.. /. ,7• • �.a 1 r•7f} 1040. Plow, r •` 1♦.1 tM1f .0 efts rats Area -'tatioi�! Pure pati tea's'•. •\ 'k'\ agitts;Sall‘4;:. \6441 ;\ \ lazaend ota. •�'>�l':-�-' \\Ni:1‘4\&\‘ dit\\ Southp %')" hopping Cente entist It 8 -0,4 \t\k\c‘ \\V* 7. '�: '�?r»'ant ' �� • �-:, �;,�:�,s/ . tOS :ri 1! w .,ffssfgit'S‘ t , •*,.*,.4, N�� ‘` \`� '''pity �` Pro e �1,'_ _._ - - _ .: CITY aF TA .. .c_4 NE�GHTS "...''; STH .Iw. c - :ra r%-4 • `, a `* Church ;� J: ti' �- '. ,r 44. c °dge'Na.0 ` - tr et Fres rvxe i e ...11 ;I 'VC? ft 1 :11•J\-• • t.'� �..-.•x 3 ft ' (/..,.. Central t f' cam Area'mercxal Page No. 2201 January 29, 1985 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Joint Workshop Meeting Held Tuesday, January 29, 1985 leant to due call and notice thereof, the joint workshop meeting of the the City 1ncil, Task Force, Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission, was held at ;po'clock P.M., at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. f• ;or Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:40 o'clock P.M. The following members represent: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. The :lowing members of the Task Force were present: Blesener, Burke, McMonigal, Shepard, ginner, Roszak and Cummins. Kevin Howe was absent and Gus Hipp sat in for Fred ibrecht. Planning Commissioners present included Stefani, Kruse, Henning, Morson and .kCommission member Schneeman. IlMIINARY REMARKS BY IN FRAZELL, CITY NISTRATOR AND EX - CIO CHAIR OF TASK FORCE .TCT BACKGROUND AND TASK ICE RECOMMENDATIONS, .. ER DAHLGREN M�( NOTES • .7'- iS i--)pass•i,/c �a -7 %,amce >wr Con sAreetia7 Q _ Was are, ;rnere) u L' c 0Ri1 ( -1-rat c, Oe c rect ed Administrator Frazell summarized the six months of work that had been done by the Task Force in arriving at the recommendation. He indicated that although the Task Force had not been able to come to complete unanimity on all of the recommendations, the report, nonetheless, was a valuable document in setting forth the pros and cons of the issues of development in the 110/149 area. Planner Dahlgren presented a brief history of planning efforts in the area, beginning with the platting of the Friendly Hills subdivision and Mn/DOT plans for the 149 roadway in the mid -50's. He also talked about construction of the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center, the proposed Mendakota redevelopment, and trafficway concerns in the area. Planner Dahlgren concluded by presenting the 13 recommendations of the Task Force: 1. Highway 149 (Dodd Road) should remain on its existing alignment. 2. South Plaza Drive should be extended north across Highway 110 as a local access road, including a pedestrian and bicycle trail. This would not be an interchange with Highway 110, but a grade separated crossing, given an acceptable financing plan. 3. Safety improvements to the Highway 110/Highway 149 intersection should be pursued with Mn/DOT. The Task Force recommends raising the entire intersection to reduce the grades coming into the intersection. This would have the added benefit of allowing South Plaza Drive to be extended as an underpass at 110, improving the visibility of the Central Commercial Area and the accessibility of • • ,1 :1. 1. k • 111 11 11411 1 Page No. 2201 January 29, 1985 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Joint Workshop Meeting Held Tuesday, January 29, 1985 leant to due call and notice thereof, the joint workshop meeting of the the City 1ncil, Task Force, Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission, was held at ;po'clock P.M., at City Hall, 750 South Plaza Drive, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. f• ;or Lockwood called the meeting to order at 7:40 o'clock P.M. The following members represent: Mayor Lockwood, Councilmembers Blesener, Cummins, Hartmann and Witt. The :lowing members of the Task Force were present: Blesener, Burke, McMonigal, Shepard, ginner, Roszak and Cummins. Kevin Howe was absent and Gus Hipp sat in for Fred ibrecht. Planning Commissioners present included Stefani, Kruse, Henning, Morson and .kCommission member Schneeman. IlMIINARY REMARKS BY IN FRAZELL, CITY NISTRATOR AND EX - CIO CHAIR OF TASK FORCE .TCT BACKGROUND AND TASK ICE RECOMMENDATIONS, .. ER DAHLGREN M�( NOTES • .7'- iS i--)pass•i,/c �a -7 %,amce >wr Con sAreetia7 Q _ Was are, ;rnere) u L' c 0Ri1 ( -1-rat c, Oe c rect ed Administrator Frazell summarized the six months of work that had been done by the Task Force in arriving at the recommendation. He indicated that although the Task Force had not been able to come to complete unanimity on all of the recommendations, the report, nonetheless, was a valuable document in setting forth the pros and cons of the issues of development in the 110/149 area. Planner Dahlgren presented a brief history of planning efforts in the area, beginning with the platting of the Friendly Hills subdivision and Mn/DOT plans for the 149 roadway in the mid -50's. He also talked about construction of the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center, the proposed Mendakota redevelopment, and trafficway concerns in the area. Planner Dahlgren concluded by presenting the 13 recommendations of the Task Force: 1. Highway 149 (Dodd Road) should remain on its existing alignment. 2. South Plaza Drive should be extended north across Highway 110 as a local access road, including a pedestrian and bicycle trail. This would not be an interchange with Highway 110, but a grade separated crossing, given an acceptable financing plan. 3. Safety improvements to the Highway 110/Highway 149 intersection should be pursued with Mn/DOT. The Task Force recommends raising the entire intersection to reduce the grades coming into the intersection. This would have the added benefit of allowing South Plaza Drive to be extended as an underpass at 110, improving the visibility of the Central Commercial Area and the accessibility of • • ,1 :1. 1. k • 111 11 11411 1 Page No. 2202 January 29, 1985 the South Plaza Drive extension. 4. Right-of-way for Highway 149 should be expanded from its current 66 feet to 100 feet by dedication and acquisition, from Decorah Lane on the south to the terminus of extended South Plaza Drive on the north. 5. Mn/DOT should release the lands held in the reserved right-of-way for Highway 149, with the City to acquire fee ;► title to that portion south of the north property line of the Friendly Hills plat for permanent open space and bike trail. 6. No land should be held or acquired by Mn/DOT for a future interchange at the 110/149 intersection. 7. For any future development in the abandoned right-of- way along the South Plaza Drive extension, the land use should be commercial west of the road, and residential east of it. This would apply both north of Highway 110 to Freeway Road, and south of Highway 110. nne,(1c1. CG Qt ,1cionecQ 1 laps `{a de.c oP- 8. The Council should respond favorably to proposals set before them which will increase the scope and quality of commercial uses in the presently zoned business area, so as to:serve as a desirable and viable focal point for community services. 9. The City code should be amended to establish a Business PUD Zoning District. The Task Force further recommends that the Council respond favorably to a proposal for a quality commercial development on the northeast corner of the Mendakota Country Club land under this new zoning classification. This will not only add a quality development to the area, but will help keep the golf course in the community. 10. The feasibility of establishing a tax increment financing district, to finance public improvements in the area, should be analyzed. Tax increment funds, together with funding from other sources, should be used to finance the extension of South Plaza Drive and its crossing of Highway 110, and other public improvements in the area. 11. The City should coordinate with Dodge Nature Preserve on the use of the northwest corner of the Center, abutting the extension of South Plaza Drive, in a manner consistent with their interests and those of the City. 12. Encourage the upgrading and expansion of the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center. Page No. 2202 January 29, 1985 the South Plaza Drive extension. 4. Right-of-way for Highway 149 should be expanded from its current 66 feet to 100 feet by dedication and acquisition, from Decorah Lane on the south to the terminus of extended South Plaza Drive on the north. 5. Mn/DOT should release the lands held in the reserved right-of-way for Highway 149, with the City to acquire fee ;► title to that portion south of the north property line of the Friendly Hills plat for permanent open space and bike trail. 6. No land should be held or acquired by Mn/DOT for a future interchange at the 110/149 intersection. 7. For any future development in the abandoned right-of- way along the South Plaza Drive extension, the land use should be commercial west of the road, and residential east of it. This would apply both north of Highway 110 to Freeway Road, and south of Highway 110. nne,(1c1. CG Qt ,1cionecQ 1 laps `{a de.c oP- 8. The Council should respond favorably to proposals set before them which will increase the scope and quality of commercial uses in the presently zoned business area, so as to:serve as a desirable and viable focal point for community services. 9. The City code should be amended to establish a Business PUD Zoning District. The Task Force further recommends that the Council respond favorably to a proposal for a quality commercial development on the northeast corner of the Mendakota Country Club land under this new zoning classification. This will not only add a quality development to the area, but will help keep the golf course in the community. 10. The feasibility of establishing a tax increment financing district, to finance public improvements in the area, should be analyzed. Tax increment funds, together with funding from other sources, should be used to finance the extension of South Plaza Drive and its crossing of Highway 110, and other public improvements in the area. 11. The City should coordinate with Dodge Nature Preserve on the use of the northwest corner of the Center, abutting the extension of South Plaza Drive, in a manner consistent with their interests and those of the City. 12. Encourage the upgrading and expansion of the Mendota Plaza Shopping Center. Page No. 2203 January 29, 1985 13. The old fire station and contiguous commercial deve- lopments to the south should be redeveloped for a use consistent with the surrounding residential areas, utili- zing tax increment financing. Planner Dahlgren concluded by saying that he thought it was important that some type of plan, whatever its specifics, be adopted for the area. The Mayor then opened the meeting for discussion and questions. Councilwoman Witt asked about traffic counts on 35E and 149, to which Planner Dahlgren responded that he was unaware of any recent studies by Mn/DOT. Councilmember Witt said that she agreed with Councilmember Blesener about not designating a specific use for the 149 easement that would be released as part of the plan. Mr. Jim Wenker, a representative of Howard Bergerud Associates, developer of the proposed shopping center, gave a brief discussion of their ideas for development. Mr. Wenker said that their group had done several shopping areas in Minnesota, including Park Square Court in St. Paul, two of the buildings at Victoria Crossing, Hill Plaza in St. Paul, and the Riverside Mall in Rochester. He indicated that they were also working on conversion of some flour mills on the riverfront in Minneapolis to commercial and residential uses. He said that their area of expertise is in the "specialty retail" portion of the market. For the Mendakota site, Mr. Wenker said that no specific plans had been drawn up. However, in general they envisioned a one or two story building of 50,000 to 100,000 square feet, with 12 to 20 tenants, and probably a couple of restaurants. He said that he felt they were targeting at a market that is not fulfilled either by large regional malls such as Burnsville Center, or a smaller strip center, such as Southview Square. Councilmember Cummins raised a question about the timing of the development on the Mendakota property. Mendakota representative Brenner responded that the 10 to 11 acres of commercial development would not be released until Mendakota had been able to rebuild and restructure the golf course, and demolish the old club house and replace it with a new one. He indicated that development of the housing on the Perkegwin land and the club house would have to get the first approval from the City before any commercial land would be released, and at the very earliest, mid 1986 would be the groundbreaking for a commercial center. Page No. 2203 January 29, 1985 13. The old fire station and contiguous commercial deve- lopments to the south should be redeveloped for a use consistent with the surrounding residential areas, utili- zing tax increment financing. Planner Dahlgren concluded by saying that he thought it was important that some type of plan, whatever its specifics, be adopted for the area. The Mayor then opened the meeting for discussion and questions. Councilwoman Witt asked about traffic counts on 35E and 149, to which Planner Dahlgren responded that he was unaware of any recent studies by Mn/DOT. Councilmember Witt said that she agreed with Councilmember Blesener about not designating a specific use for the 149 easement that would be released as part of the plan. Mr. Jim Wenker, a representative of Howard Bergerud Associates, developer of the proposed shopping center, gave a brief discussion of their ideas for development. Mr. Wenker said that their group had done several shopping areas in Minnesota, including Park Square Court in St. Paul, two of the buildings at Victoria Crossing, Hill Plaza in St. Paul, and the Riverside Mall in Rochester. He indicated that they were also working on conversion of some flour mills on the riverfront in Minneapolis to commercial and residential uses. He said that their area of expertise is in the "specialty retail" portion of the market. For the Mendakota site, Mr. Wenker said that no specific plans had been drawn up. However, in general they envisioned a one or two story building of 50,000 to 100,000 square feet, with 12 to 20 tenants, and probably a couple of restaurants. He said that he felt they were targeting at a market that is not fulfilled either by large regional malls such as Burnsville Center, or a smaller strip center, such as Southview Square. Councilmember Cummins raised a question about the timing of the development on the Mendakota property. Mendakota representative Brenner responded that the 10 to 11 acres of commercial development would not be released until Mendakota had been able to rebuild and restructure the golf course, and demolish the old club house and replace it with a new one. He indicated that development of the housing on the Perkegwin land and the club house would have to get the first approval from the City before any commercial land would be released, and at the very earliest, mid 1986 would be the groundbreaking for a commercial center. J Page No. 2204 January 29, 1985 Mr. Brenner went on to add that the club was asking Bergerud Associates to put up a letter of credit, contingent upon favorable Council action on their proposal, to ensure that they would be around when it was time for the commercial development. Mr. Wenker responded that they would be ready to proceed with their committments whenever the City gave its approval. Park Commissioner Mary Jeanne Schneeman indicated that while she had originally been skeptical about this type of shopping center in Mendota Heights, she was now convinced that the community could use something of this quality. Planning Commission Chairperson Cameron Kruse said that he generally liked the plan, but felt that there were a lot of "ifs" in it, and that those would have to be cleared and tightened up as we proceeded. He also indicated that he did not like the idea of placing the City Hall on such expensive land, but would prefer that that land be used for some tax generating purpose. He also said that he thought it was important that we have a strong professional opinion on the market viability of any new commercial center. Task Force member John Roszak discussed the reasons for his objection to task force recommendation No. 9, on rezoning the Mendakota property. He said that he thought that the recommendation was that the Council should look favorably upon a proposal for this development, and that he thought it was very important that the data supporting that recommendation and Council decision be available. Therefore, he said that he had objected to making the recommendation. Task Force member Lou Brenner responded that he thought the purpose of the Task Force was not to tell the Council specifically how to vote on rezoning, but to provide a general comprehensive plan for the area from which the Council could react. He also pointed out that in the Task Force deliberations, it was understood that much of the money to build the extended South Plaza Drive would come from the tax increment district generated by the additional development, and that the road is something the City really wants. He added that the developers are not asking for_ any public subsidy of their private investment. City Planner Howard Dahlgren gave a brief presentation on the concept of a Business Planned Unit Development zoning concept. It was indicated that this could be used as an alternative to simply rezoning the property to some existing zoning classification in the City code, to provide the City with a much higher level of control over J Page No. 2204 January 29, 1985 Mr. Brenner went on to add that the club was asking Bergerud Associates to put up a letter of credit, contingent upon favorable Council action on their proposal, to ensure that they would be around when it was time for the commercial development. Mr. Wenker responded that they would be ready to proceed with their committments whenever the City gave its approval. Park Commissioner Mary Jeanne Schneeman indicated that while she had originally been skeptical about this type of shopping center in Mendota Heights, she was now convinced that the community could use something of this quality. Planning Commission Chairperson Cameron Kruse said that he generally liked the plan, but felt that there were a lot of "ifs" in it, and that those would have to be cleared and tightened up as we proceeded. He also indicated that he did not like the idea of placing the City Hall on such expensive land, but would prefer that that land be used for some tax generating purpose. He also said that he thought it was important that we have a strong professional opinion on the market viability of any new commercial center. Task Force member John Roszak discussed the reasons for his objection to task force recommendation No. 9, on rezoning the Mendakota property. He said that he thought that the recommendation was that the Council should look favorably upon a proposal for this development, and that he thought it was very important that the data supporting that recommendation and Council decision be available. Therefore, he said that he had objected to making the recommendation. Task Force member Lou Brenner responded that he thought the purpose of the Task Force was not to tell the Council specifically how to vote on rezoning, but to provide a general comprehensive plan for the area from which the Council could react. He also pointed out that in the Task Force deliberations, it was understood that much of the money to build the extended South Plaza Drive would come from the tax increment district generated by the additional development, and that the road is something the City really wants. He added that the developers are not asking for_ any public subsidy of their private investment. City Planner Howard Dahlgren gave a brief presentation on the concept of a Business Planned Unit Development zoning concept. It was indicated that this could be used as an alternative to simply rezoning the property to some existing zoning classification in the City code, to provide the City with a much higher level of control over Page No. 2205 January 29, 1985 the type and quality of development that could be placed on the property. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the only "right" the landowner would have would be to develop something consistent with the precise PUD that had been approved for the site, rather than just meeting the general code requirements for a business zoned district. Mayor Lockwood said that he thought the Councils number one priority ought to be how we finance a separated road crossing, since this had been a concern to the community for a long time. Planning Commissioner Morson said that he thought the extended South Plaza Drive would become a heavily used alternative to going through the 110/149 intersection, and that it should therefore be designed very carefully, particularly the turn off Dodd Road. Task Force alternate Gus Hipp said that he also was concerned about the amount of traffic that would be coming into the area to support the shopping centers. Councilmember Cummins said that he thought we needed a good analysis of traffic at the South Plaza Drive/149 area, so that we weren't simply moving a hazardous traffic situation from 110/149 a block to the south. City Planner Dahlgren responded that "T" intersections are the safest kind. A typical cross intersection has 16 possible points of car collision, whereas a "T" intersection has only 3. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that frequently "T" intersections don't even have traffic lights, although if the area meets the "warrants", the City could petition Mn/DOT for installation oftraffic signals. Planner Dahlgren went on to say that the amount of commercial development proposed in the Task Force report is relatively -small, compared to the size of the community and the potential market. He also said that he thought that heavy use of the new South Plaza Drive "crossover" would simply mean that it was serving its purpose, and he was not concerned that a significant traffic problem would be created. Planning Commission Chairperson Kruse indicated that projections show the population of Mendota Heights will increase by about 60% before the community reaches saturation, which will create more traffic. He said therefore, it was unrealistic to feel that we could maintain our rather low traffic levels, and we are going to have to face that issue anyway. • Page No. 2205 January 29, 1985 the type and quality of development that could be placed on the property. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the only "right" the landowner would have would be to develop something consistent with the precise PUD that had been approved for the site, rather than just meeting the general code requirements for a business zoned district. Mayor Lockwood said that he thought the Councils number one priority ought to be how we finance a separated road crossing, since this had been a concern to the community for a long time. Planning Commissioner Morson said that he thought the extended South Plaza Drive would become a heavily used alternative to going through the 110/149 intersection, and that it should therefore be designed very carefully, particularly the turn off Dodd Road. Task Force alternate Gus Hipp said that he also was concerned about the amount of traffic that would be coming into the area to support the shopping centers. Councilmember Cummins said that he thought we needed a good analysis of traffic at the South Plaza Drive/149 area, so that we weren't simply moving a hazardous traffic situation from 110/149 a block to the south. City Planner Dahlgren responded that "T" intersections are the safest kind. A typical cross intersection has 16 possible points of car collision, whereas a "T" intersection has only 3. Mr. Dahlgren indicated that frequently "T" intersections don't even have traffic lights, although if the area meets the "warrants", the City could petition Mn/DOT for installation oftraffic signals. Planner Dahlgren went on to say that the amount of commercial development proposed in the Task Force report is relatively -small, compared to the size of the community and the potential market. He also said that he thought that heavy use of the new South Plaza Drive "crossover" would simply mean that it was serving its purpose, and he was not concerned that a significant traffic problem would be created. Planning Commission Chairperson Kruse indicated that projections show the population of Mendota Heights will increase by about 60% before the community reaches saturation, which will create more traffic. He said therefore, it was unrealistic to feel that we could maintain our rather low traffic levels, and we are going to have to face that issue anyway. • VURN 1 Page No. 2206 January 29, 1985 Task Force member Brenner said that Mn/DOT took population and traffic projection figures into account in deciding not to build a relocated 149 on the easterly alignment He said that obviously if the main concern was traffic safety, that would have been the best place for the roadway, but Mn/DOT did not feel that was justified. Mayor Lockwood said that he did not think the Council needed to take any formal action this evening, but it was important to think of follow-up actions to be taken. Councilmember Cummins agreed that the Planning Commission, Council and others should begin analyzing the report. Mendakota representative Brenner said that while they realized the plans would have to receive more of a hearing, they would like some feeling for the position of the City on considering this development. Mayor Lockwood asked if the Planning Commission and Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren could come up with a series of objectives to be accomplished, along with some timing, to which the Council could react. He also suggested that the Council officially receive both the Task Force Report, and the Minority Report which had been submitted at its next meeting. Planner Dahlgren responded that there are several specific steps that the City could take in considering whether to implement the plan, and that they could outline those procedures. It was agreed that that should be completed, and come back before the Council for its consideration at a subsequent meeting. It was also agreed that the upcoming issue of the City newsletter should include some coverage on the Planning effort. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 o'c ock P.M. Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator VURN 1 Page No. 2206 January 29, 1985 Task Force member Brenner said that Mn/DOT took population and traffic projection figures into account in deciding not to build a relocated 149 on the easterly alignment He said that obviously if the main concern was traffic safety, that would have been the best place for the roadway, but Mn/DOT did not feel that was justified. Mayor Lockwood said that he did not think the Council needed to take any formal action this evening, but it was important to think of follow-up actions to be taken. Councilmember Cummins agreed that the Planning Commission, Council and others should begin analyzing the report. Mendakota representative Brenner said that while they realized the plans would have to receive more of a hearing, they would like some feeling for the position of the City on considering this development. Mayor Lockwood asked if the Planning Commission and Planning Consultant Howard Dahlgren could come up with a series of objectives to be accomplished, along with some timing, to which the Council could react. He also suggested that the Council officially receive both the Task Force Report, and the Minority Report which had been submitted at its next meeting. Planner Dahlgren responded that there are several specific steps that the City could take in considering whether to implement the plan, and that they could outline those procedures. It was agreed that that should be completed, and come back before the Council for its consideration at a subsequent meeting. It was also agreed that the upcoming issue of the City newsletter should include some coverage on the Planning effort. The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 o'c ock P.M. Kevin D. Frazell City Administrator CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Board of Review Meeting INTRODUCTION January 9, 1991 In accordance with State Statute, Council must meet annually as the Board of (Tax) Review. We have received notification from the Dakota County Assessor of the date and time designated for the city's 1991 Board of Review. The Assessor would like to conduct the meeting on Tuesday, April 9th, at 7:30 P.M. INFORMATION The Assessor has designated the Mendota Heights Board of Review to be conducted at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, April 9th. The only other date available is Tuesday, April 16th, which coincides with a regular Council meeting date. Even though open book meetings will be held for Mendota Heights property owners on March 20th and 21st (at the South St. Paul municipal building), the Assessor's Office expects that many property owners will attend the Board of Review and does not recommend conducting both meetings on the same date. At the 1989 Board of Review, Assessor Marvin Pulju distributed material to the Council regarding the 1990 Assessment, Board of Review responsibilities, etc. Although the information which related specifically to 1990 will change, the material should serve as a good instructional tool for new Council members and a refresher for the remainder of Council. For this reason, a copy of the material is attached. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Council pass a motion to schedule the annual Board of Review for the date and time designated by the County Assessor. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to schedule the 1991 Board of Review for 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, April 9, 1991. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk SUBJECT: Board of Review Meeting INTRODUCTION January 9, 1991 In accordance with State Statute, Council must meet annually as the Board of (Tax) Review. We have received notification from the Dakota County Assessor of the date and time designated for the city's 1991 Board of Review. The Assessor would like to conduct the meeting on Tuesday, April 9th, at 7:30 P.M. INFORMATION The Assessor has designated the Mendota Heights Board of Review to be conducted at 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, April 9th. The only other date available is Tuesday, April 16th, which coincides with a regular Council meeting date. Even though open book meetings will be held for Mendota Heights property owners on March 20th and 21st (at the South St. Paul municipal building), the Assessor's Office expects that many property owners will attend the Board of Review and does not recommend conducting both meetings on the same date. At the 1989 Board of Review, Assessor Marvin Pulju distributed material to the Council regarding the 1990 Assessment, Board of Review responsibilities, etc. Although the information which related specifically to 1990 will change, the material should serve as a good instructional tool for new Council members and a refresher for the remainder of Council. For this reason, a copy of the material is attached. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that Council pass a motion to schedule the annual Board of Review for the date and time designated by the County Assessor. ACTION REQUIRED If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a motion to schedule the 1991 Board of Review for 7:30 P.M. on Tuesday, April 9, 1991. 1990 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION The 1990 Assessment, like each of the annual assessments, affects all the property owners of Dakota County. State Law requires the assessor to reassess all property every year. State Statutes read, "All real property subject to taxation shall be listed and assessed every year with reference to its value on January 2nd preceding the assessment." Minnesota Statute 273.11 reads, "All property shall be valued at its market value. In estimating and determining such value, the assessor shall not adopt a lower or different standard of value because the same is to serve as basis for taxation, nor shall he adopt as criterion of value the price for the aggregate with all the property in the town or district but he shall value each article or description of property by itself, and at such sum or price as he believes the property to be fairly worth in money." The Statute says all property shall be valued at market value, not may be valued at market value. This obviously means that no factors other than market value issues (such as personalities, politics, owner's income, etc.) shall affect the assessor's value and the subsequent action by the Board of Review. Market value has been defined many different ways. Simply stated it is "The most probable price estimated in terms of money which a property will bring if exposed for sale on the open market by a seller who is willing but not obligated to sell, allowing a reasonable time to find a purchaser who is willing but not obligated to buy, both with knowledge of all the uses to which it is adapted and for which it is capable of being used." The real estate tax is an ad valorem tax which is based on the value of property and not on the ability of the property owner to pay. The values placed on all real estate in Dakota County are based on the estimated value of land and the improvements upon the land, while no consideration is given to who owns the land Market values for most residential properties were generated using a computerized appraisal system. This system was purchased by Dakota County in early 1988. Assessor staff has been transferring the appraisal data/characteristics into the computer during the past year & a half. Building characteristics of each house were entered into the computer system. The same type of information was entered on 1990 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION The 1990 Assessment, like each of the annual assessments, affects all the property owners of Dakota County. State Law requires the assessor to reassess all property every year. State Statutes read, "All real property subject to taxation shall be listed and assessed every year with reference to its value on January 2nd preceding the assessment." Minnesota Statute 273.11 reads, "All property shall be valued at its market value. In estimating and determining such value, the assessor shall not adopt a lower or different standard of value because the same is to serve as basis for taxation, nor shall he adopt as criterion of value the price for the aggregate with all the property in the town or district but he shall value each article or description of property by itself, and at such sum or price as he believes the property to be fairly worth in money." The Statute says all property shall be valued at market value, not may be valued at market value. This obviously means that no factors other than market value issues (such as personalities, politics, owner's income, etc.) shall affect the assessor's value and the subsequent action by the Board of Review. Market value has been defined many different ways. Simply stated it is "The most probable price estimated in terms of money which a property will bring if exposed for sale on the open market by a seller who is willing but not obligated to sell, allowing a reasonable time to find a purchaser who is willing but not obligated to buy, both with knowledge of all the uses to which it is adapted and for which it is capable of being used." The real estate tax is an ad valorem tax which is based on the value of property and not on the ability of the property owner to pay. The values placed on all real estate in Dakota County are based on the estimated value of land and the improvements upon the land, while no consideration is given to who owns the land Market values for most residential properties were generated using a computerized appraisal system. This system was purchased by Dakota County in early 1988. Assessor staff has been transferring the appraisal data/characteristics into the computer during the past year & a half. Building characteristics of each house were entered into the computer system. The same type of information was entered on 5.. each property, i.e. size, year built, effective year built, exterior walls, # bedrooms, # baths, type of heat, air conditioning, extras (such as fireplaces, outbuilding, decks) and several other characteristics. Over 10,000 sales were analyzed to determine what properties are selling for. .For the 1990 assessment, the law requires sales taking place between Oct. 1, 1988 and Sept. 30, 1989 only, be considered and used as the basis for the 1990 assessment. Changes in market value for the 1990 assessment, taxes payable in 1991, varied from large increases on some properties to reductions in value on other properties. By using the CAMA system to generate values, a greater degree of equalization of like properties has resulted. Adjustments have been made to recognize market differences between communities by using a neighborhood factor. This factor will be further refined in future years to recognize and adjust for the various neighborhoods within each city or township. Due to the large number of values being changed as a result of using the new computerized mass appraisal system (CAMA) the Assessor's Office conducted informal, open book meetings over a ten day period in March. All property owners were invited to attend one of these meetings to discuss their new valuation with appraisal staff. Over 2,000 people attended these meetings. The number of people attending the open book meetings from was approximately 9/ It is hoped that the number of people requesting a hearing before the various local boards of review will be reduced significantly because of prior attendance at the open book meetings. 5.. each property, i.e. size, year built, effective year built, exterior walls, # bedrooms, # baths, type of heat, air conditioning, extras (such as fireplaces, outbuilding, decks) and several other characteristics. Over 10,000 sales were analyzed to determine what properties are selling for. .For the 1990 assessment, the law requires sales taking place between Oct. 1, 1988 and Sept. 30, 1989 only, be considered and used as the basis for the 1990 assessment. Changes in market value for the 1990 assessment, taxes payable in 1991, varied from large increases on some properties to reductions in value on other properties. By using the CAMA system to generate values, a greater degree of equalization of like properties has resulted. Adjustments have been made to recognize market differences between communities by using a neighborhood factor. This factor will be further refined in future years to recognize and adjust for the various neighborhoods within each city or township. Due to the large number of values being changed as a result of using the new computerized mass appraisal system (CAMA) the Assessor's Office conducted informal, open book meetings over a ten day period in March. All property owners were invited to attend one of these meetings to discuss their new valuation with appraisal staff. Over 2,000 people attended these meetings. The number of people attending the open book meetings from was approximately 9/ It is hoped that the number of people requesting a hearing before the various local boards of review will be reduced significantly because of prior attendance at the open book meetings. RESPONSIBILITIES OF LOCAL BOARDS OF REVIEW The town board of each town, the council or other governing body of each city, is the Board of Review except in cities whose charters provide for a Board of Equalization. The County Assessor shall fix a day and time when the Board or the Board of Equalization shall meet in the assessment districts'of the County. On or before February 15th of each"year the Assessor shall give written notice of the time to the city or town clerk. The meetings must be held between April 1 and May 31 each year. The clerk shall give published and posted notice of the meeting at least ten days before the date of the meeting. The Board shall meet at the office of the clerk to review the assessment and classification of property in the town or city. No changes in valuation may be made by the County Assessor after the Board of Review or the County Board of Equalization has adjourned. This restriction does not apply to corrections of errors that are merely clerical or administrative in nature. The Board shall determine whether the taxable property in the town or city has been properly placed on the list and properly valued by the assessor. If real or personal property has been omitted, the Board shall place it on the list with its market.value, and correct the assessment so that each tract or lot of real property, and each article, parcel, or class of personal property, is entered on the assessment list at its market value. No assessment of the property of any person may be raised unless the person has been duly notified of the intent of the Board to do so. On application of any person feeling aggrieved, the Board shall review the assessment or classification, or both, and correct it as appears just. A Local Board of Reviewmay reduce assessments upon petition of the taxpayer but the total reductions must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the County Assessor by more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the aggregate assessments made by the County Assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments may be made. The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or double assessments discovered by the Board of Review without regard to the one percent limitation. - A majority of the members may act at the meeting, and adjourn from day to day until they finish hearing the cases presented. The assessor shall attend, with the assessment books and papers, and take part in the proceedings, but must not vote. The County Assessor shall attend the meetings. The Board shall list separately, on a form appended to the assessment book, all omitted property added to the list by the Board and all items of property increased or decreased, with the market value of each item of property, added or changed by the Board, placed opposite RESPONSIBILITIES OF LOCAL BOARDS OF REVIEW The town board of each town, the council or other governing body of each city, is the Board of Review except in cities whose charters provide for a Board of Equalization. The County Assessor shall fix a day and time when the Board or the Board of Equalization shall meet in the assessment districts'of the County. On or before February 15th of each"year the Assessor shall give written notice of the time to the city or town clerk. The meetings must be held between April 1 and May 31 each year. The clerk shall give published and posted notice of the meeting at least ten days before the date of the meeting. The Board shall meet at the office of the clerk to review the assessment and classification of property in the town or city. No changes in valuation may be made by the County Assessor after the Board of Review or the County Board of Equalization has adjourned. This restriction does not apply to corrections of errors that are merely clerical or administrative in nature. The Board shall determine whether the taxable property in the town or city has been properly placed on the list and properly valued by the assessor. If real or personal property has been omitted, the Board shall place it on the list with its market.value, and correct the assessment so that each tract or lot of real property, and each article, parcel, or class of personal property, is entered on the assessment list at its market value. No assessment of the property of any person may be raised unless the person has been duly notified of the intent of the Board to do so. On application of any person feeling aggrieved, the Board shall review the assessment or classification, or both, and correct it as appears just. A Local Board of Reviewmay reduce assessments upon petition of the taxpayer but the total reductions must not reduce the aggregate assessment made by the County Assessor by more than one percent. If the total reductions would lower the aggregate assessments made by the County Assessor by more than one percent, none of the adjustments may be made. The assessor shall correct any clerical errors or double assessments discovered by the Board of Review without regard to the one percent limitation. - A majority of the members may act at the meeting, and adjourn from day to day until they finish hearing the cases presented. The assessor shall attend, with the assessment books and papers, and take part in the proceedings, but must not vote. The County Assessor shall attend the meetings. The Board shall list separately, on a form appended to the assessment book, all omitted property added to the list by the Board and all items of property increased or decreased, with the market value of each item of property, added or changed by the Board, placed opposite the item. The County Assessor shall enter all changes made by the Board in the assessment book. If a person fails to appear in person, by counsel, or by written communication before the Board after being duly notified of the Board's intent to raise the assessment of the property, or if a person feeling aggrieved by an assessment or classification fails to apply for a review of the assessment or classification, the person may not appear before the County Board of Equalization for a review of the assessment or classification. This paragraph does not apply if an assessment was made after the Board meeting, as provided in Section 273.01, or if the person can establish not having received notice of market value at least five days before the Local Board of Review meeting. The Board of Review or the Board of Equalization must complete its work and adjourn within 20 days from the time of convening stated in the notice of the clerk, unless a longer period is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. No action taken after that date is valid. All complaints about an assessment or classification, made after the meeting of the Board must be heard and determined by the County Board of Equalization. A nonresident may, at any time, before the meeting of the Board of Review file written objections to an assessment or classification with the County Assessor . The objections must be presented to the Board of Review at its meeting by the County Assessor for its consideration. (M.S. 274.01) the item. The County Assessor shall enter all changes made by the Board in the assessment book. If a person fails to appear in person, by counsel, or by written communication before the Board after being duly notified of the Board's intent to raise the assessment of the property, or if a person feeling aggrieved by an assessment or classification fails to apply for a review of the assessment or classification, the person may not appear before the County Board of Equalization for a review of the assessment or classification. This paragraph does not apply if an assessment was made after the Board meeting, as provided in Section 273.01, or if the person can establish not having received notice of market value at least five days before the Local Board of Review meeting. The Board of Review or the Board of Equalization must complete its work and adjourn within 20 days from the time of convening stated in the notice of the clerk, unless a longer period is approved by the Commissioner of Revenue. No action taken after that date is valid. All complaints about an assessment or classification, made after the meeting of the Board must be heard and determined by the County Board of Equalization. A nonresident may, at any time, before the meeting of the Board of Review file written objections to an assessment or classification with the County Assessor . The objections must be presented to the Board of Review at its meeting by the County Assessor for its consideration. (M.S. 274.01) RESPONSES TO TYPICAL TAXPAYER QUESTIONS 1. Q. Why did my taxes increase? A. The fundamental reason for increase in taxes is increased government spending. The government suffers from inflation just as individuals do, as well as demands for increased services. For property taxes payable in 1990, there were some changes in State aids to school districts and local units of government. 2. Q. Market Value and Property Class - How do they affect property taxes? A. The market value amount represents the assessor's estimate of your property's actual market value. MARKET VALUE is defined as the most probable price that a well informed buyer would pay a well informedseller for a property without either party being unduly forced to buy or sell. PROPERTY CLASS is the class that has been assigned to your property based upon the use of your property. Different class rates for various uses of property have been established by state law. These class rates are the same throughout Minnesota. Depending on the class rate of your property, your final tax may be more or less than another property of the same market value with a different class rate. 3. Q. What is gross tax capacity? A. The gross tax capacity is calculated by multiplying the estimated- market value by the gross class rate for that type of property. 4. Q. What does the term HACA mean? A. HACA is the homestead credit and agricultural credit paid by the state directly to the local units of government. 5. Q. What is the net tax capacity? A. The net tax capacity is calculated by multiplying the estimated market value by the net class rate for that type of property. For example, residential property homesteaded for payable 1989 had a classification percentage of 2.17% on the first $68,000, 2.50% on $68,000 to $100,000, and 3.3% for everything above RESPONSES TO TYPICAL TAXPAYER QUESTIONS 1. Q. Why did my taxes increase? A. The fundamental reason for increase in taxes is increased government spending. The government suffers from inflation just as individuals do, as well as demands for increased services. For property taxes payable in 1990, there were some changes in State aids to school districts and local units of government. 2. Q. Market Value and Property Class - How do they affect property taxes? A. The market value amount represents the assessor's estimate of your property's actual market value. MARKET VALUE is defined as the most probable price that a well informed buyer would pay a well informedseller for a property without either party being unduly forced to buy or sell. PROPERTY CLASS is the class that has been assigned to your property based upon the use of your property. Different class rates for various uses of property have been established by state law. These class rates are the same throughout Minnesota. Depending on the class rate of your property, your final tax may be more or less than another property of the same market value with a different class rate. 3. Q. What is gross tax capacity? A. The gross tax capacity is calculated by multiplying the estimated- market value by the gross class rate for that type of property. 4. Q. What does the term HACA mean? A. HACA is the homestead credit and agricultural credit paid by the state directly to the local units of government. 5. Q. What is the net tax capacity? A. The net tax capacity is calculated by multiplying the estimated market value by the net class rate for that type of property. For example, residential property homesteaded for payable 1989 had a classification percentage of 2.17% on the first $68,000, 2.50% on $68,000 to $100,000, and 3.3% for everything above $100,000. For the payable 1990 taxes the net tax capacity percentages will be 1.0% for the first $68,000, 2.0% for $68,000 to $100,000, and 3.0% for everything above $100,000. Upon request, the Assessor's office will mail a sheet showing the tax capacity percentages for all property types. 6. Q. What are the steps for calculating net taxes? A. A hypothetical example is: 1. Market Value single resident 2. Classification = Residential 1st $68,000 x 1.0% _ $68,000 - 100,000 x 2.0% = $25,000 x 3.0% _ home = $125,000 Homestead $680 $640 $750 Net Tax Capacity of $2,070 x local tax rate of NET TAXES = $2,022.44 97.703 7. Q. Why are non -homestead taxes so much higher than homestead? A. Many individuals think that the non -homestead tax burden will be $700 or $725 higher than the homestead tax burden, because that is the figure that used to show on the property tax statement. This is incorrect. The property tax benefits of owning and occupying one's own home are reflected not just in the State Paid Homestead Credit, but also in calculation of the net tax capacity from the market value. The tax capacity percentages on homestead property are 1.0% on the first $68,000, 2.0% on the next $32,000, and 3.0% on all values above $100,000. The tax capacity percentage on non -homestead property is 3.0%. This serves to reduce the net tax capacity and hence the tax. For example, a $100,000 home with a local tax rate 97.703% would have the following tax burdens: - Homestead Tax, - Non -Homestead Tax, $1,289.70 $2,931.10 (or $1,641.40 more than full Homestead) The relative tax burdens between different types of property (residential versus industrial versus apartments) as well as different classifications within the same type of property (Homestead versus Non - homestead) are policy decisions made by the Minnesota State Legislature. 8. Q.' I bought my house last year during the year. Why are my taxes non -homestead for payable 1990? $100,000. For the payable 1990 taxes the net tax capacity percentages will be 1.0% for the first $68,000, 2.0% for $68,000 to $100,000, and 3.0% for everything above $100,000. Upon request, the Assessor's office will mail a sheet showing the tax capacity percentages for all property types. 6. Q. What are the steps for calculating net taxes? A. A hypothetical example is: 1. Market Value single resident 2. Classification = Residential 1st $68,000 x 1.0% _ $68,000 - 100,000 x 2.0% = $25,000 x 3.0% _ home = $125,000 Homestead $680 $640 $750 Net Tax Capacity of $2,070 x local tax rate of NET TAXES = $2,022.44 97.703 7. Q. Why are non -homestead taxes so much higher than homestead? A. Many individuals think that the non -homestead tax burden will be $700 or $725 higher than the homestead tax burden, because that is the figure that used to show on the property tax statement. This is incorrect. The property tax benefits of owning and occupying one's own home are reflected not just in the State Paid Homestead Credit, but also in calculation of the net tax capacity from the market value. The tax capacity percentages on homestead property are 1.0% on the first $68,000, 2.0% on the next $32,000, and 3.0% on all values above $100,000. The tax capacity percentage on non -homestead property is 3.0%. This serves to reduce the net tax capacity and hence the tax. For example, a $100,000 home with a local tax rate 97.703% would have the following tax burdens: - Homestead Tax, - Non -Homestead Tax, $1,289.70 $2,931.10 (or $1,641.40 more than full Homestead) The relative tax burdens between different types of property (residential versus industrial versus apartments) as well as different classifications within the same type of property (Homestead versus Non - homestead) are policy decisions made by the Minnesota State Legislature. 8. Q.' I bought my house last year during the year. Why are my taxes non -homestead for payable 1990? A. Taxes payable in 1990 are based on the valuation -and classification as of January 2, 1989. If your property was not owned and occupied as of January 2, 1989, the taxes payable in 1990 will be at the non -homestead rate. If you were to have owned and occupied your property by June 1, 1989, it would be classified as mid -year but receive the full homestead rate. 9. Q. What is the Fiscal Disparities Program? A. The program provides for the of the commercial/industrial metro area since 1971. A percentage of the property commercial/industrial parcel county uniform rate. 10. Q. What is a TIF District? sharing of 40% of the growth tax base in the seven -county tax on each is calculated at the seven - A. Tax Increment Financing - TIF districts are created to aid new development. Generally bonds are issued to finance special improvement projects,.to provide write downs of land costs, to provide a catalyst for development that theoretically would not have occurred without the assistance (referred to as the "but -for" test). A base year is established and as market value increases the additional tax generated is used to pay off the TIF bonds. 11. Q. What is the Property Tax Refund Program? A. There are two programs: 1. An income based refund for renters and homeowners. The income based program is to insure that person's property taxes do not become disproportionate with ,their income. The refund schedules and filing information is contained in the Department of Revenue booklet, "1989 Minnesota Property Tax Refund" which is available by calling 296-3781. The refund does not apply to tax increases resulting from new improvements. 2. State -reimbursed targeting refund is for homesteads, some commercial/industrial, and seasonal recreational property. Residential homestead property - for taxes payable in 1990, an increase in property taxes would have the owner paying the first 10%; the state pays 75% of the next $250 of increase and 90% of any increase above that. Forms and information is available in the A. Taxes payable in 1990 are based on the valuation -and classification as of January 2, 1989. If your property was not owned and occupied as of January 2, 1989, the taxes payable in 1990 will be at the non -homestead rate. If you were to have owned and occupied your property by June 1, 1989, it would be classified as mid -year but receive the full homestead rate. 9. Q. What is the Fiscal Disparities Program? A. The program provides for the of the commercial/industrial metro area since 1971. A percentage of the property commercial/industrial parcel county uniform rate. 10. Q. What is a TIF District? sharing of 40% of the growth tax base in the seven -county tax on each is calculated at the seven - A. Tax Increment Financing - TIF districts are created to aid new development. Generally bonds are issued to finance special improvement projects,.to provide write downs of land costs, to provide a catalyst for development that theoretically would not have occurred without the assistance (referred to as the "but -for" test). A base year is established and as market value increases the additional tax generated is used to pay off the TIF bonds. 11. Q. What is the Property Tax Refund Program? A. There are two programs: 1. An income based refund for renters and homeowners. The income based program is to insure that person's property taxes do not become disproportionate with ,their income. The refund schedules and filing information is contained in the Department of Revenue booklet, "1989 Minnesota Property Tax Refund" which is available by calling 296-3781. The refund does not apply to tax increases resulting from new improvements. 2. State -reimbursed targeting refund is for homesteads, some commercial/industrial, and seasonal recreational property. Residential homestead property - for taxes payable in 1990, an increase in property taxes would have the owner paying the first 10%; the state pays 75% of the next $250 of increase and 90% of any increase above that. Forms and information is available in the booklet from the Department of Revenue, "1989 Minnesota Property Tax Refund." Copies and information is available by calling 296-3781. Targeting does not provide refunds to tax increases resulting from new improvements. 12. Q. What can I do about my taxes? A. The assessor deals with classification and valuation of the property, which provides the basis for the taxes, but not the specific tax amount. If the classification or valuation is in error the first step is to discuss your concerns with the assessor. If an agreement cannot be reached, a more formal method of appeal is necessary. There are basically three methods of appealing the valuation or classification of a property. They are: - the abatement process - Local Board of Review, County Board of Equalization - the Tax Court, including the Small Claims Division The abatement process is an administrative appeal done by the County Assessor. The Local Board of Review meets in April and May to respond to taxpayer concerns on the January 2nd valuation and classification. These are generally informal meetings where an individual will express his or her concerns to the Board. The Board generallyconsists of the City Council or Township Board Members. They have no jurisdiction over taxes payable in the current year, only about the January 2nd classification and valuation. The County Board of Equalization has many parallel duties with the Local Board, but has the additional function of equalizing values between jurisdictions within the County. The Tax Court consists of three judges that comprise a division of the Executive Branch of Government. They hear all types of tax appeals, but spend a majority of their time in real estate. Filing information can be obtained by calling the Tax Court at 296-2806. booklet from the Department of Revenue, "1989 Minnesota Property Tax Refund." Copies and information is available by calling 296-3781. Targeting does not provide refunds to tax increases resulting from new improvements. 12. Q. What can I do about my taxes? A. The assessor deals with classification and valuation of the property, which provides the basis for the taxes, but not the specific tax amount. If the classification or valuation is in error the first step is to discuss your concerns with the assessor. If an agreement cannot be reached, a more formal method of appeal is necessary. There are basically three methods of appealing the valuation or classification of a property. They are: - the abatement process - Local Board of Review, County Board of Equalization - the Tax Court, including the Small Claims Division The abatement process is an administrative appeal done by the County Assessor. The Local Board of Review meets in April and May to respond to taxpayer concerns on the January 2nd valuation and classification. These are generally informal meetings where an individual will express his or her concerns to the Board. The Board generallyconsists of the City Council or Township Board Members. They have no jurisdiction over taxes payable in the current year, only about the January 2nd classification and valuation. The County Board of Equalization has many parallel duties with the Local Board, but has the additional function of equalizing values between jurisdictions within the County. The Tax Court consists of three judges that comprise a division of the Executive Branch of Government. They hear all types of tax appeals, but spend a majority of their time in real estate. Filing information can be obtained by calling the Tax Court at 296-2806. VALUATION APPEAL PROCESS NOTIFICATION OF VALUE DISCUSSION WITH AND REVIEW BY ASSESSOR LOCAL BOARD REVIEW COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ABATEMENT REQUEST MINNESOTA TAX COURT MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT VALUATION APPEAL PROCESS NOTIFICATION OF VALUE DISCUSSION WITH AND REVIEW BY ASSESSOR LOCAL BOARD REVIEW COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION ABATEMENT REQUEST MINNESOTA TAX COURT MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT Reforming Minnesota's Property Tax System 1989 Law Changes Minnesota tax reform since 1984 Since the mid-1980s, Minnesota has focused much thought and effort on reforming its major taxa: 1983 Governor Pcrpich establishes the Min- nesota Tax Study Commission; report issued in 1984. 1984 10 percent income tax surtax repealed. 1985 Income tax simplified; rites lowered. Estate tax simplified; becomes a "pick- up" tax equal to the Federal credit for state tax. 1987 Major individual and corporate income tax reform'accontplished through in- creased conformity to federal tax laws, including the 1986 federal tax reform; tax base broadened, rates lowered and forms greatly simplified. Sales tax base broadened and made more fair through the elimination of several special exemptions. 1988 Disparities in property tag rates be- tween communities reduced. Number of property tax classes cut from 68 to 29. Propertytax system changed; tax equals a percent of the property's value. 1989 Sales tax on capital equipment pur- chases for new or expanding manu- facturing operations eliminated, which will encourage the expansion of busi- nesses in Minnesota. income tax on insurance companies updated to accord with current federal law, which will case administration and improve compliance. 1989 Property Tax Reform for Minnesota Introduction The -property tax reform just passed by a special session of the Minnesota Legislature and signed into law by Governor- Pcrpich marks the latest step in the state's contniit- ntent to a tax system that is fair. efficient. stable, competitive, and understandable, both in structure and in operation. The reform includes: reducing or eliminating projected in- creases in 1990 property taxes lot .dl property owners; • increasing fairness by reducing tax rates on heavily taxed classes of property; • beginning the process of untangling iJte financing oflocal government services to ensure that property tax revenues are spent primarily on local smites, and state awls are spent pnntarily for state -required programs. • encouraging more citizen participation in local government spending and taxing decisions by making the system easier to understand. and by requiring notice to each property owner of proposal tax increases and budget hearings. Holding down property tax increases for 1990 11'ithottt the lax relief provided in the re- form. total property taxes would have in- creased about 14 percent in 1990. Reforming Minnesota's Property Tax System 1989 Law Changes Minnesota tax reform since 1984 Since the mid-1980s, Minnesota has focused much thought and effort on reforming its major taxa: 1983 Governor Pcrpich establishes the Min- nesota Tax Study Commission; report issued in 1984. 1984 10 percent income tax surtax repealed. 1985 Income tax simplified; rites lowered. Estate tax simplified; becomes a "pick- up" tax equal to the Federal credit for state tax. 1987 Major individual and corporate income tax reform'accontplished through in- creased conformity to federal tax laws, including the 1986 federal tax reform; tax base broadened, rates lowered and forms greatly simplified. Sales tax base broadened and made more fair through the elimination of several special exemptions. 1988 Disparities in property tag rates be- tween communities reduced. Number of property tax classes cut from 68 to 29. Propertytax system changed; tax equals a percent of the property's value. 1989 Sales tax on capital equipment pur- chases for new or expanding manu- facturing operations eliminated, which will encourage the expansion of busi- nesses in Minnesota. income tax on insurance companies updated to accord with current federal law, which will case administration and improve compliance. 1989 Property Tax Reform for Minnesota Introduction The -property tax reform just passed by a special session of the Minnesota Legislature and signed into law by Governor- Pcrpich marks the latest step in the state's contniit- ntent to a tax system that is fair. efficient. stable, competitive, and understandable, both in structure and in operation. The reform includes: reducing or eliminating projected in- creases in 1990 property taxes lot .dl property owners; • increasing fairness by reducing tax rates on heavily taxed classes of property; • beginning the process of untangling iJte financing oflocal government services to ensure that property tax revenues are spent primarily on local smites, and state awls are spent pnntarily for state -required programs. • encouraging more citizen participation in local government spending and taxing decisions by making the system easier to understand. and by requiring notice to each property owner of proposal tax increases and budget hearings. Holding down property tax increases for 1990 11'ithottt the lax relief provided in the re- form. total property taxes would have in- creased about 14 percent in 1990. The tax relief included in the reform will hold the increase in the total property tax to about 1.5 percent in 1990. which is less than the annual rate of inflation. Because property taxes on newly con- structed buildings account for about 3 per- cent of the growth in tax revenues, the total property taxon existing properties will actu- ally decrease about 1 percent. Since the property tax is a local tax af- fected by local spending and taxing decisions and by changes in property values, the actual change in tax from 1989 to 1990 will vary from property to property. with some decreases and some increases from 1989 levels. All property owners, however, will pay far less property tax in 1990 than they would have without this tax relief. Percent change In taxes from 1989 to 1990 before and after reform Existing properties only Property before atter class reform reform Farms 13.0% 3.8% Cabins 7.6 • 2.5 Homes . 12.1 -2.7 Rental housing 9.0 -11.5 Businesses 10.9 1.0 All properties (including new construction) Farms 13.0%._ 3.8% Cabins 10.6 - 5.5 Homes 15.1 0.3 Rental housing 13.0 -7.5 BV-esses 14.9 5.0 Improving fairness of the system Besides holding down property tax in- creases for all classes of property, the reform concentrates property tax reliefon rental hous- ing and mid- to high-value homes, reducing property taxes in 1990 for these two heavily taxed classes of property. The reduction in property taxes on rental housing will help promote an adequate supply of affordable, well-maintained rental housing. The reduction in property taxes on homes mitigates the effects of recent substantial inflation of home values,which results in push- ing lower -value homes into the middle -value range and middle -value homes into the high- value range. Owners of business property -another heav- ily cavily taxed class of property -are also targeted to receive property tax relief in 1990. Failure to provide this tax relief would have allowed the total p%Olx rte tax on business propert\ to riNe approximately 15 percent in 1990. But with it, the total property tax payable by business property owners will increase by only 5 percent in 1990. About 80 percent of this increase will be clue to growth in newly constructed buildings. The owners of existing business properties will experience an aver- age increase of about 1 percent in 1990. In 1990, owners of business property lo- cated in communities with relatively high, property tax rates will be eligible for a refund of a portion of the tax on' the amount of the property's value over $100,000. Tax rates for businesses are scheduled to be reduced again in 1991. 1992. and 1993. However, the phasing down of the tax rate on the portion ofa business's property value over $100.000 after 1991 will depend on the legislature's response to recommendations that the governor makes for lowering the tax .rate. The cut in tax rates on business property, which are among the highest in the nation on office, retail and storage facilities, will enable Minnesota businesses to compete more effec- tively with businesses in other states, and will encourage businesses from other states to locate facilities in Minnesota. Tax Rates for Property Classes Specifically, the new law reduces property tax rates on the following classes of property: Homes, especially mid- to high-value hornes: from 2.5 percent to 2.0 percent on tl►e portion of the home's value between $68.000 to $100,000; from 3.3 percent to 3.0 percent on the portion of the home's value over $100,000. Apartment buildings and rental homes: from 4.1 percent to 3.6 percent for apart- ment buildings; from 3.5 percent to 3.0 percent for single- family homes, duplexes and triplexes. The law requires the owners of rental housing to cotnply with local health, safety and building maintenance codes in order to qualify for the reduced tax rate on the rental property. The tax relief included in the reform will hold the increase in the total property tax to about 1.5 percent in 1990. which is less than the annual rate of inflation. Because property taxes on newly con- structed buildings account for about 3 per- cent of the growth in tax revenues, the total property taxon existing properties will actu- ally decrease about 1 percent. Since the property tax is a local tax af- fected by local spending and taxing decisions and by changes in property values, the actual change in tax from 1989 to 1990 will vary from property to property. with some decreases and some increases from 1989 levels. All property owners, however, will pay far less property tax in 1990 than they would have without this tax relief. Percent change In taxes from 1989 to 1990 before and after reform Existing properties only Property before atter class reform reform Farms 13.0% 3.8% Cabins 7.6 • 2.5 Homes . 12.1 -2.7 Rental housing 9.0 -11.5 Businesses 10.9 1.0 All properties (including new construction) Farms 13.0%._ 3.8% Cabins 10.6 - 5.5 Homes 15.1 0.3 Rental housing 13.0 -7.5 BV-esses 14.9 5.0 Improving fairness of the system Besides holding down property tax in- creases for all classes of property, the reform concentrates property tax reliefon rental hous- ing and mid- to high-value homes, reducing property taxes in 1990 for these two heavily taxed classes of property. The reduction in property taxes on rental housing will help promote an adequate supply of affordable, well-maintained rental housing. The reduction in property taxes on homes mitigates the effects of recent substantial inflation of home values,which results in push- ing lower -value homes into the middle -value range and middle -value homes into the high- value range. Owners of business property -another heav- ily cavily taxed class of property -are also targeted to receive property tax relief in 1990. Failure to provide this tax relief would have allowed the total p%Olx rte tax on business propert\ to riNe approximately 15 percent in 1990. But with it, the total property tax payable by business property owners will increase by only 5 percent in 1990. About 80 percent of this increase will be clue to growth in newly constructed buildings. The owners of existing business properties will experience an aver- age increase of about 1 percent in 1990. In 1990, owners of business property lo- cated in communities with relatively high, property tax rates will be eligible for a refund of a portion of the tax on' the amount of the property's value over $100,000. Tax rates for businesses are scheduled to be reduced again in 1991. 1992. and 1993. However, the phasing down of the tax rate on the portion ofa business's property value over $100.000 after 1991 will depend on the legislature's response to recommendations that the governor makes for lowering the tax .rate. The cut in tax rates on business property, which are among the highest in the nation on office, retail and storage facilities, will enable Minnesota businesses to compete more effec- tively with businesses in other states, and will encourage businesses from other states to locate facilities in Minnesota. Tax Rates for Property Classes Specifically, the new law reduces property tax rates on the following classes of property: Homes, especially mid- to high-value hornes: from 2.5 percent to 2.0 percent on tl►e portion of the home's value between $68.000 to $100,000; from 3.3 percent to 3.0 percent on the portion of the home's value over $100,000. Apartment buildings and rental homes: from 4.1 percent to 3.6 percent for apart- ment buildings; from 3.5 percent to 3.0 percent for single- family homes, duplexes and triplexes. The law requires the owners of rental housing to cotnply with local health, safety and building maintenance codes in order to qualify for the reduced tax rate on the rental property. Business property: Irony 3.3 percent on the first $100,000 of value to 3.0 perccnt by 1993; from 5.25 perccnt to 5.06 percent in 199() and to 4.95 percent in 1991 on value over $ 100,000; ultimate goal set at 4.0 percent. For businesses in communities with rela- ivcly high taxes, the new law also provides for t special property tax refund of up to $4,000 -or taxes payable in 1990 and 1991. Farms and timberland: In addition, the new law consolidates ;everaI tax rates that applied to farmland into hrcc rates for 1990 and two rates by 1992. Ile - ;inning in 1990, farm homes will be taxed at he same class rates that apply to other horses. For 1990, the tax rates on homesteaded armland will be: 0.4 perccnt on the first $100,000; 1.3 percent on the balance of the vahic of the first 320 acres on a homestead; 1.7 perccnt on all remaining farmland and on timberland. Comparing tax rates for 1990 Before Atter reform reform Homes First $68,000 1.0 1.0 $68,000-$100,000 2.5 2.0 Over $100,000 3.3 3.0 Businesses First $100,000 3.3 3.3 Over $100,000 5.25 5.06 Rental Housing 1-3 lAoa Mints By 1992, the two tax rates on the portion of the farm's value over $100,000 will be con- solidated into one tax rate of 1.5 percent. The tax rate on timberland will also be cut to 1.5 percent. County boards of commissioners retain the option of assessing timberland according to its fair market value or on a method based on the annual growth of tim- ber on the property. Property Tax Refund Changes In addition to cuts in the tax rates, many Minnesota homeowners, renters, and cabin owners will also benefit from changes in the state's property tax refund programs. The changes include: For homeowners, • expanding eligibility for regular prop- erty tax refunds in 1990 to homeowners with household incomes of up to $60,000. In 1989, eligibility for the refund was limited to homeowners with household incomes of no more than $35,000. • increasing the dollar amount of refunds homeowners can receive through the regular property tax refund program. • removing the limit for 1988 returns (filed in 1989) on the amount of the special property tax refund (targeting) for home- owners who experience an unusually high increase in property taxes; and • extending the special property tax refund program (targeting) to 1994. Before the special session, the special (targeting) property tax refund for 1989 was limited to 75 percent of that portion of a property tax increase over 10 percent, up to a maximum refund of $250. Because the new law removes the maximum, ,the Department of Revenue is recomputing all 1989 special property tax refunds already filed, and will mail an additional refund to homeowners who filed previously and were affected by the refund limit, with no further action needed on their part. Business property: Irony 3.3 percent on the first $100,000 of value to 3.0 perccnt by 1993; from 5.25 perccnt to 5.06 percent in 199() and to 4.95 percent in 1991 on value over $ 100,000; ultimate goal set at 4.0 percent. For businesses in communities with rela- ivcly high taxes, the new law also provides for t special property tax refund of up to $4,000 -or taxes payable in 1990 and 1991. Farms and timberland: In addition, the new law consolidates ;everaI tax rates that applied to farmland into hrcc rates for 1990 and two rates by 1992. Ile - ;inning in 1990, farm homes will be taxed at he same class rates that apply to other horses. For 1990, the tax rates on homesteaded armland will be: 0.4 perccnt on the first $100,000; 1.3 percent on the balance of the vahic of the first 320 acres on a homestead; 1.7 perccnt on all remaining farmland and on timberland. Comparing tax rates for 1990 Before Atter reform reform Homes First $68,000 1.0 1.0 $68,000-$100,000 2.5 2.0 Over $100,000 3.3 3.0 Businesses First $100,000 3.3 3.3 Over $100,000 5.25 5.06 Rental Housing 1-3 lAoa Mints By 1992, the two tax rates on the portion of the farm's value over $100,000 will be con- solidated into one tax rate of 1.5 percent. The tax rate on timberland will also be cut to 1.5 percent. County boards of commissioners retain the option of assessing timberland according to its fair market value or on a method based on the annual growth of tim- ber on the property. Property Tax Refund Changes In addition to cuts in the tax rates, many Minnesota homeowners, renters, and cabin owners will also benefit from changes in the state's property tax refund programs. The changes include: For homeowners, • expanding eligibility for regular prop- erty tax refunds in 1990 to homeowners with household incomes of up to $60,000. In 1989, eligibility for the refund was limited to homeowners with household incomes of no more than $35,000. • increasing the dollar amount of refunds homeowners can receive through the regular property tax refund program. • removing the limit for 1988 returns (filed in 1989) on the amount of the special property tax refund (targeting) for home- owners who experience an unusually high increase in property taxes; and • extending the special property tax refund program (targeting) to 1994. Before the special session, the special (targeting) property tax refund for 1989 was limited to 75 percent of that portion of a property tax increase over 10 percent, up to a maximum refund of $250. Because the new law removes the maximum, ,the Department of Revenue is recomputing all 1989 special property tax refunds already filed, and will mail an additional refund to homeowners who filed previously and were affected by the refund limit, with no further action needed on their part. • Starting in 1990, the state will pay 75 percent of the first $250 of the tax increase over 10 percent and 90 percent of the balance of the tax increase. The amount of the tax in- crease over 10 percent to which the 75 per- cent rate applies is increased after 1991 as follows: 1992: 75 percent of the first S275 of the increase over 10 percent; 1993: 75 percent of the first S300 of the increase over 10 percent; 1994: 75 percent of the first S325 of the increase over 10 percent. To be eligible for the refund; a homeowner's properly tax must increase by at least S40 in 1990 and 1991. S60 in 1992, SHO in 1993 and $100 in 1994. Another provision of the law directs the Department of Revenue to develop by Febru- ary 15, 1990, a series of recommendations for: • ch;tnging eligibility for the property tax refund in order to provide additional refund dollars to homeowners in 1991; • simplifying the program to .make applica- tions easier to complete; and • increasing public awareness and partici- pation in the program. For renters, The property tax refund program for ren- ters for 1989 applications filed in 1990 re- mains essentially the same as this year's pro- gram. However, for 19911 applications filed in 1991, renters will receive greater refunds. Further, the law directs the Department of Revenue to develop a more generous schedule to compensate renters for reduc- tions in refund amounts due to cuts in prop- erty taxes on rental housing. For owners of seasonal residential recrea- tional properties (cabins), A one-time property tax refund program was adopted for the owners of cabins who ex- perience an unusually high increase in their property tax from 1989 to 1990. Under the program, owners of property classified as seasonal residential recreational are eligible for a refund of 75 percent of the first S250 of tax increase over 10 percent. Reorganizing taxing and spending responsibilities The new law begins the process of clarify- ing and restructuring the taxing and spend- ing responsibilities of state and local govern- ments. It establishes the general principle that the state should pay for programs it mandates, and that local governments should pay for.local spending decisions. The new law also recognizes that financing of some soy - ices should be shared by both state and local government. In addition, the law establishes the prin- ciple that state aid funds may be used to help ensure that certain communities can provide a basic level of services without having to impose excessively high taxes on property owners. In this first stage, the new law: • provides SIR million for state takeover of court costs. lit 1990, the state assumes the costs for district court administration, public defense services for juvenile and misdemeanor cases in Hennepin and Ramsey counties and operation of the trial court information system:* • provides for the complete state takeover of income maintenance (public assis- tance) programs in 1991; • prepares the state for future assumption of the costs of other human service pro- grams; and • Starting in 1990, the state will pay 75 percent of the first $250 of the tax increase over 10 percent and 90 percent of the balance of the tax increase. The amount of the tax in- crease over 10 percent to which the 75 per- cent rate applies is increased after 1991 as follows: 1992: 75 percent of the first S275 of the increase over 10 percent; 1993: 75 percent of the first S300 of the increase over 10 percent; 1994: 75 percent of the first S325 of the increase over 10 percent. To be eligible for the refund; a homeowner's properly tax must increase by at least S40 in 1990 and 1991. S60 in 1992, SHO in 1993 and $100 in 1994. Another provision of the law directs the Department of Revenue to develop by Febru- ary 15, 1990, a series of recommendations for: • ch;tnging eligibility for the property tax refund in order to provide additional refund dollars to homeowners in 1991; • simplifying the program to .make applica- tions easier to complete; and • increasing public awareness and partici- pation in the program. For renters, The property tax refund program for ren- ters for 1989 applications filed in 1990 re- mains essentially the same as this year's pro- gram. However, for 19911 applications filed in 1991, renters will receive greater refunds. Further, the law directs the Department of Revenue to develop a more generous schedule to compensate renters for reduc- tions in refund amounts due to cuts in prop- erty taxes on rental housing. For owners of seasonal residential recrea- tional properties (cabins), A one-time property tax refund program was adopted for the owners of cabins who ex- perience an unusually high increase in their property tax from 1989 to 1990. Under the program, owners of property classified as seasonal residential recreational are eligible for a refund of 75 percent of the first S250 of tax increase over 10 percent. Reorganizing taxing and spending responsibilities The new law begins the process of clarify- ing and restructuring the taxing and spend- ing responsibilities of state and local govern- ments. It establishes the general principle that the state should pay for programs it mandates, and that local governments should pay for.local spending decisions. The new law also recognizes that financing of some soy - ices should be shared by both state and local government. In addition, the law establishes the prin- ciple that state aid funds may be used to help ensure that certain communities can provide a basic level of services without having to impose excessively high taxes on property owners. In this first stage, the new law: • provides SIR million for state takeover of court costs. lit 1990, the state assumes the costs for district court administration, public defense services for juvenile and misdemeanor cases in Hennepin and Ramsey counties and operation of the trial court information system:* • provides for the complete state takeover of income maintenance (public assis- tance) programs in 1991; • prepares the state for future assumption of the costs of other human service pro- grams; and • increases state share of K-12 funding by $113 million to allow for a corresponding reduction in local school district levies. The state's share of education spending will rise from 61 perccnt to 64 percent. In respect to rcmaining programs involy ng state aid to local government, thc law tipulatcs that a joint House -Senate legislative :ommission will recommend which programs Atould be paid for by which type of govern- ment. The law also requires the governor to review all undesignated state aid programs, as well as all aids that arc designated for human services and for elementary and secondary :ducation, and then make recommendations o the commission. If the governor recommends shifting the inancing of a program from state to local •esources, the governor must also identify Atich other state programs are to receive the state revenues. The ncw law also directs the commission o recommend changes in financial reporting ncthods to ensure public oversight of local ;overnmcnt expenditures. Overall, the reform provides for reducing >ur reliance on property taxes for the funding )f education, human services and other non- iroperty-related programs so that local gov rnments can use property taxes to support ocalty determined, property -related services. Encouraging citizen participation, controlling spending In order to improve taxpayers' under- standing of the property tax system and to en- courage their participation in and control of thc system, the new tax law: • reduces the number of property tax rates from 21 in 1989 to 10 in 1990 and 8 in 1993 (see below): • simplifies the terms used to refer to as- pects of the property tax system; • removes state -imposed Icvy limits on year- to-year increases in property tax collec- tions for cities in 1992 and for counties in 1993; • requires property tax bills to show a year- to-year comparison of the amount of tax the property owner pays to each local gov- ernment so citizens can more easily iden- tify which officials are responsible for what taxing decisions; Number of property tax class rates 1990 before reform 1990 alter 1993 reform • provides for truth -in -taxation notices to - give property owners an opportunity to express their opinions on upcoming spending decisions which will affect the amount of property tax they will pay: Hennepin, Ramsey and St. Louis calm - tics will snail each property owner a "proposed property tax statement" showing the amount of property tax the owner would pay to each local gov- ernrnent if the local governments adopt the budgets they arc consider- ing. - All other counties will mail each prop- erty owner a statcmcnt announcing thc total amount of property tax to be collected by their county, by their city or town and by their school district if local governments adopt the budget amounts they arc considering. To encourage fiscal responsibility on the state level, whenever a bill for a ncw or ex- panded program is introduced, it must in- clude information about the program's financial impact on both state and local gov- ernments. • To help control current and future spend- ing, the law requires the/governor to pro- pose ways to cut programs by $50 million in 1990 and $100 million in 1991. Finally, because the bill helps clarify the relationships between state and local taxing responsibilities, citizens will be better equipped to know which unit of government to hold accountable for decisions. (Future spending increases will: be controlled if the government unit that decides to expand a program is required to pay for that decision.) 4, • increases state share of K-12 funding by $113 million to allow for a corresponding reduction in local school district levies. The state's share of education spending will rise from 61 perccnt to 64 percent. In respect to rcmaining programs involy ng state aid to local government, thc law tipulatcs that a joint House -Senate legislative :ommission will recommend which programs Atould be paid for by which type of govern- ment. The law also requires the governor to review all undesignated state aid programs, as well as all aids that arc designated for human services and for elementary and secondary :ducation, and then make recommendations o the commission. If the governor recommends shifting the inancing of a program from state to local •esources, the governor must also identify Atich other state programs are to receive the state revenues. The ncw law also directs the commission o recommend changes in financial reporting ncthods to ensure public oversight of local ;overnmcnt expenditures. Overall, the reform provides for reducing >ur reliance on property taxes for the funding )f education, human services and other non- iroperty-related programs so that local gov rnments can use property taxes to support ocalty determined, property -related services. Encouraging citizen participation, controlling spending In order to improve taxpayers' under- standing of the property tax system and to en- courage their participation in and control of thc system, the new tax law: • reduces the number of property tax rates from 21 in 1989 to 10 in 1990 and 8 in 1993 (see below): • simplifies the terms used to refer to as- pects of the property tax system; • removes state -imposed Icvy limits on year- to-year increases in property tax collec- tions for cities in 1992 and for counties in 1993; • requires property tax bills to show a year- to-year comparison of the amount of tax the property owner pays to each local gov- ernment so citizens can more easily iden- tify which officials are responsible for what taxing decisions; Number of property tax class rates 1990 before reform 1990 alter 1993 reform • provides for truth -in -taxation notices to - give property owners an opportunity to express their opinions on upcoming spending decisions which will affect the amount of property tax they will pay: Hennepin, Ramsey and St. Louis calm - tics will snail each property owner a "proposed property tax statement" showing the amount of property tax the owner would pay to each local gov- ernrnent if the local governments adopt the budgets they arc consider- ing. - All other counties will mail each prop- erty owner a statcmcnt announcing thc total amount of property tax to be collected by their county, by their city or town and by their school district if local governments adopt the budget amounts they arc considering. To encourage fiscal responsibility on the state level, whenever a bill for a ncw or ex- panded program is introduced, it must in- clude information about the program's financial impact on both state and local gov- ernments. • To help control current and future spend- ing, the law requires the/governor to pro- pose ways to cut programs by $50 million in 1990 and $100 million in 1991. Finally, because the bill helps clarify the relationships between state and local taxing responsibilities, citizens will be better equipped to know which unit of government to hold accountable for decisions. (Future spending increases will: be controlled if the government unit that decides to expand a program is required to pay for that decision.) 4,