1991-01-02CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
JANUARY 2, 1991- 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Oath of Office
4. Agenda Adoption
6. Approval of the December 18th Minutes
7. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the December Building Activity Report.
b. Approval of the 1991 Amendments to Recycling Joint Powers
Agreement.
c. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-01, Resolution Establishing
1991 City Depositories of Funds.
d. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-02, Resolution Accepting
Pledged Securities for 1991.
e. Approval of 1991 Salary Adjustment for the Full -Time
Temporary Engineer.
f. Approval to Dispose of Surplus Property.
g. Approval to Purchase Computer Items for the Police
Department.
h. Approval of the Lilydale Drainage Agreement - RESOLUTION
NO. 91-03.
i. Approval of the List of Contractors.
j. Approval of the List of Claims.
* k. Acknowledge Receipt of Summons - Centex Real Estate
Corporation.
End of Consent Calendar
8. Public Comments
9. Presentation
a. Acceptance of Aetna Camera Donation.
10. First of Year Administrative Actions
a. Appointment of Acting Mayor for 1991.
b. Appointment of Health Officer for 1991.
c. Designation of Official Newspaper for 1991.
d. Committee Appointments for 1991.
**
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
JANUARY 2, 1991- 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Oath of Office
4. Agenda Adoption
6. Approval of the December 18th Minutes
7. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the December Building Activity Report.
b. Approval of the 1991 Amendments to Recycling Joint Powers
Agreement.
c. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-01, Resolution Establishing
1991 City Depositories of Funds.
d. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-02, Resolution Accepting
Pledged Securities for 1991.
e. Approval of 1991 Salary Adjustment for the Full -Time
Temporary Engineer.
f. Approval to Dispose of Surplus Property.
g. Approval to Purchase Computer Items for the Police
Department.
h. Approval of the Lilydale Drainage Agreement - RESOLUTION
NO. 91-03.
i. Approval of the List of Contractors.
j. Approval of the List of Claims.
* k. Acknowledge Receipt of Summons - Centex Real Estate
Corporation.
End of Consent Calendar
8. Public Comments
9. Presentation
a. Acceptance of Aetna Camera Donation.
10. First of Year Administrative Actions
a. Appointment of Acting Mayor for 1991.
b. Appointment of Health Officer for 1991.
c. Designation of Official Newspaper for 1991.
d. Committee Appointments for 1991.
**
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
JANUARY 2, 1991- 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Oath of Office
4. Agenda Adoption
6. Approval of the December 18th Minutes
7. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the December Building Activity Report.
b. Approval of the 1991 Amendments to Recycling Joint Powers
Agreement.
c. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-01, Resolution Establishing
1991 City Depositories of Funds.
d. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-02, Resolution Accepting
Pledged Securities for 1991.
e. Approval of 1991 Salary Adjustment for the Full -Time
Temporary Engineer.
f. Approval to Dispose of Surplus Property.
g. Approval to Purchase Computer Items for the Police
Department.
h. Approval of the Lilydale Drainage Agreement - RESOLUTION
NO. 91-03.
i. Approval of the List of Contractors.
j. Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
8. Public Comments
9. Presentation
a. Acceptance of Aetna Camera Donation.
10. First of Year Administrative Actions
a. Appointment of Acting Mayor for 199
b. Appointment of Health Officer for 991.
c. Designation of Official Newspaper for 1991.
d. Committee Appointments for 1991.
11. Unfinished and New Business
a. Comfort Station Architects Selection.
12. Council Comments
13. Adjourn
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AGENDA
JANUARY 2, 1991- 7:30 P.M.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Oath of Office
4. Agenda Adoption
6. Approval of the December 18th Minutes
7. Consent Calendar
a. Acknowledgment of the December Building Activity Report.
b. Approval of the 1991 Amendments to Recycling Joint Powers
Agreement.
c. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-01, Resolution Establishing
1991 City Depositories of Funds.
d. Adoption of RESOLUTION NO. 91-02, Resolution Accepting
Pledged Securities for 1991.
e. Approval of 1991 Salary Adjustment for the Full -Time
Temporary Engineer.
f. Approval to Dispose of Surplus Property.
g. Approval to Purchase Computer Items for the Police
Department.
h. Approval of the Lilydale Drainage Agreement - RESOLUTION
NO. 91-03.
i. Approval of the List of Contractors.
j. Approval of the List of Claims.
End of Consent Calendar
8. Public Comments
9. Presentation
a. Acceptance of Aetna Camera Donation.
10. First of Year Administrative Actions
a. Appointment of Acting Mayor for 199
b. Appointment of Health Officer for 991.
c. Designation of Official Newspaper for 1991.
d. Committee Appointments for 1991.
11. Unfinished and New Business
a. Comfort Station Architects Selection.
12. Council Comments
13. Adjourn
Page No. 2978
December 18, 1990
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, December 18, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Anderson, Blesener, Cummins and Hartmann.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
minutes of the December 4th regular meeting
with correction.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the
December 11th Park and Recreation
Commission minutes.
b. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department
monthly report for October.
c. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department
monthly report for November.
d. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly
report for November.
e. Approval of the 1991-1992 Labor Contract
settlement between the City and The
Teamster's Local 320 bargaining unit
(Public Works), along with authorization
for execution of the formal labor
agreement by the Mayor and City Clerk.
Page No. 2978
December 18, 1990
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, December 18, 1990
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the
City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M.
The following members were present: Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmembers
Anderson, Blesener, Cummins and Hartmann.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of the
revised agenda for the meeting.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
minutes of the December 4th regular meeting
with correction.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved approval of the
consent calendar for the meeting along with
authorization for execution of any necessary
documents contained therein.
a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the
December 11th Park and Recreation
Commission minutes.
b. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department
monthly report for October.
c. Acknowledgment of the Fire Department
monthly report for November.
d. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's monthly
report for November.
e. Approval of the 1991-1992 Labor Contract
settlement between the City and The
Teamster's Local 320 bargaining unit
(Public Works), along with authorization
for execution of the formal labor
agreement by the Mayor and City Clerk.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
BID AWARD, FIRE
EQUIPMENT/COMMAND
VEHICLE
Page No. 2979
December 18, 1990
f. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-85,
"RESOLUTION AMENDING PAY CLASSIFICATION
SCHEDULE FOR NON -ORGANIZED EMPLOYEES TO
REFLECT A 4% ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FOR 1991.
g. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-86,
"RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF
COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES FOR
1991 AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN OTHER
BENEFITS."
"
h. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-87,
"RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SANITARY
SEWER RENTAL CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA COUNTY
AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE
TAXES."
i. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated December 18, 1990 and
attached hereto.
J -
Approval of the list of claims dated
December 18, 1990 and totalling
$193,867.35.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Fire Chief Maczko and members of the Fire
Department truck committee were present to
discuss bids received for the purchase of an
equipment/command vehicle. Chief Maczko
reviewed his report to Council, and
recommended that the contract be awarded to
Road Rescue, Inc., for its low bid of
$110,286.00. He informed Council that Road
Rescue has sold equipment to several fire
departments in Dakota County and that
reference checks received from those
departments were all favorable.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that there is a
$3,000 to $7,000 shortfall between available
financing and the purchase price. He asked
Fire Chief Maczko if he is prepared to
reallocate the departmental budget for 1991 to
accommodate the shortfall. Chief Maczko
responded that he will do so if necessary.
Mayor Mertensotto asked when the existing
rescue vehicle will be sold. Chief Maczko
responded that the sale will be done as soon
as possible and that he expects that the
1
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
BID AWARD, FIRE
EQUIPMENT/COMMAND
VEHICLE
Page No. 2979
December 18, 1990
f. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-85,
"RESOLUTION AMENDING PAY CLASSIFICATION
SCHEDULE FOR NON -ORGANIZED EMPLOYEES TO
REFLECT A 4% ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FOR 1991.
g. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-86,
"RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SCHEDULE OF
COMPENSATION FOR CERTAIN EMPLOYEES FOR
1991 AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN OTHER
BENEFITS."
"
h. Adoption of Resolution No. 90-87,
"RESOLUTION CERTIFYING DELINQUENT SANITARY
SEWER RENTAL CHARGES TO THE DAKOTA COUNTY
AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE
TAXES."
i. Approval of the list of contractor
licenses dated December 18, 1990 and
attached hereto.
J -
Approval of the list of claims dated
December 18, 1990 and totalling
$193,867.35.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Fire Chief Maczko and members of the Fire
Department truck committee were present to
discuss bids received for the purchase of an
equipment/command vehicle. Chief Maczko
reviewed his report to Council, and
recommended that the contract be awarded to
Road Rescue, Inc., for its low bid of
$110,286.00. He informed Council that Road
Rescue has sold equipment to several fire
departments in Dakota County and that
reference checks received from those
departments were all favorable.
Mayor Mertensotto pointed out that there is a
$3,000 to $7,000 shortfall between available
financing and the purchase price. He asked
Fire Chief Maczko if he is prepared to
reallocate the departmental budget for 1991 to
accommodate the shortfall. Chief Maczko
responded that he will do so if necessary.
Mayor Mertensotto asked when the existing
rescue vehicle will be sold. Chief Maczko
responded that the sale will be done as soon
as possible and that he expects that the
1
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
GLENHILL ROAD
Page No. 2980
December 18, 1990
vehicle can be sold for between $8,000 and
$10,000 but that he would like to leave the
sale date negotiable because the truck will be
needed until the new one arrives in June,
although it could be sold as early as April.
Council also acknowledged a report on
financing from Treasurer Shaughnessy, who
recommended that a final decision on Equipment
Certificates issuance be delayed until the
1992 Budget preparation begins.
Councilmember Cummins stated that financing
alternatives are available and that the
shortfall can be managed from the 1991 Fire
Department budget, or an appropriation from
fund balance if necessary.
Councilmember Cummins moved to accept the bids
received for the fire equipment/command
vehicle and to award the contract to Road
Rescue, Inc., for its low bid of $110,286.00
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize the
Fire Department to advertise for bids for the
sale of the existing rescue vehicle and set a
bid return date of March 15th at 4:00 P.M.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
The Council acknowledged memos from Public
Works Director Danielson regarding the
Glenhill Road realignment, along with a letter
from Mn/DOT and final layout and grades for an
"s -curve" design. Council also acknowledged a
letter from Mrs. Linda Linsmaier and residents
on Glenhill Road and Culligan Lane.
Public Works Director Danielson reviewed past
Council discussions on the two design
alternatives, s -curve and cul-de-sac. He
stated that on December 4th Council directed
staff to inform Mn/DOT that the Council
elected to make the connection (s -curve
option) and to ask Mn/DOT to design the safest
and best possible connection. The design has
been received, and grades are at 5% with a
nice landing at the frontage road. The road
will slide southerly and follow the T.H. 110
westbound alignment. One of the problems with
the alignment is with respect to existing
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
GLENHILL ROAD
Page No. 2980
December 18, 1990
vehicle can be sold for between $8,000 and
$10,000 but that he would like to leave the
sale date negotiable because the truck will be
needed until the new one arrives in June,
although it could be sold as early as April.
Council also acknowledged a report on
financing from Treasurer Shaughnessy, who
recommended that a final decision on Equipment
Certificates issuance be delayed until the
1992 Budget preparation begins.
Councilmember Cummins stated that financing
alternatives are available and that the
shortfall can be managed from the 1991 Fire
Department budget, or an appropriation from
fund balance if necessary.
Councilmember Cummins moved to accept the bids
received for the fire equipment/command
vehicle and to award the contract to Road
Rescue, Inc., for its low bid of $110,286.00
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to authorize the
Fire Department to advertise for bids for the
sale of the existing rescue vehicle and set a
bid return date of March 15th at 4:00 P.M.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
The Council acknowledged memos from Public
Works Director Danielson regarding the
Glenhill Road realignment, along with a letter
from Mn/DOT and final layout and grades for an
"s -curve" design. Council also acknowledged a
letter from Mrs. Linda Linsmaier and residents
on Glenhill Road and Culligan Lane.
Public Works Director Danielson reviewed past
Council discussions on the two design
alternatives, s -curve and cul-de-sac. He
stated that on December 4th Council directed
staff to inform Mn/DOT that the Council
elected to make the connection (s -curve
option) and to ask Mn/DOT to design the safest
and best possible connection. The design has
been received, and grades are at 5% with a
nice landing at the frontage road. The road
will slide southerly and follow the T.H. 110
westbound alignment. One of the problems with
the alignment is with respect to existing
Page No. 2981
December 18, 1990
sanitary sewer line which serves the Culligan
addition. Some of the utility will have to be
rerouted to allow construction of the road, at
an estimated cost of $30,000. The line is on
Mn/DOT right-of-way, and because of prior
agreement with the City, Mn/DOT will not pay
the costs.
Councilmember Cummins stated that in the
December 17th Mn/DOT letter, Assistant
District Engineer Christensen still feels that
the cul-de-sac would be the best solution. He
did not recall that Council was advised at the
last meeting that Mn/DOT felt the cul-de-sac
was the best solution. Public Works Director
Danielson responded that in the Mn/DOT letter
which was before Council on December 4th,
Mn/DOT indicated that it felt the cul-de-sac
was the best solution.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has talked to
some of the area residents and that they feel
one of the major problems is that the
neighborhood would have no way to get into the
pedway system unless the s -curve option is
approved. He felt that the determination on
design must be made based on overall planning.
With respect to the pedway issue,
Councilmember Cummins stated that the City
could install a 6 foot paved trail from the
cul-de-sac along retained frontage road right-
of-way.
Councilmember Hartmann asked whether the s -
curve design submitted by Mn/DOT is better or
worse, from a safety standpoint, than the
existing connection. Mr. Danielson stated
that it is better than what exists.
Councilmember Hartmann stated that one of the
reasons he has for wanting to maintain the
connection is to provide two ways in and out
of the area.
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that it is
not on the meeting agenda to change Council's
December 4th vote on the issue. He pointed
out that this is not a public hearing. He did
not think the safety considerations have
changed and stated that he appreciates that
many in the neighborhood strongly prefer the
cul-de-sac but that at the last meeting there
were also many who felt the connection should
be saved. He pointed out that safety is the
Page No. 2981
December 18, 1990
sanitary sewer line which serves the Culligan
addition. Some of the utility will have to be
rerouted to allow construction of the road, at
an estimated cost of $30,000. The line is on
Mn/DOT right-of-way, and because of prior
agreement with the City, Mn/DOT will not pay
the costs.
Councilmember Cummins stated that in the
December 17th Mn/DOT letter, Assistant
District Engineer Christensen still feels that
the cul-de-sac would be the best solution. He
did not recall that Council was advised at the
last meeting that Mn/DOT felt the cul-de-sac
was the best solution. Public Works Director
Danielson responded that in the Mn/DOT letter
which was before Council on December 4th,
Mn/DOT indicated that it felt the cul-de-sac
was the best solution.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that he has talked to
some of the area residents and that they feel
one of the major problems is that the
neighborhood would have no way to get into the
pedway system unless the s -curve option is
approved. He felt that the determination on
design must be made based on overall planning.
With respect to the pedway issue,
Councilmember Cummins stated that the City
could install a 6 foot paved trail from the
cul-de-sac along retained frontage road right-
of-way.
Councilmember Hartmann asked whether the s -
curve design submitted by Mn/DOT is better or
worse, from a safety standpoint, than the
existing connection. Mr. Danielson stated
that it is better than what exists.
Councilmember Hartmann stated that one of the
reasons he has for wanting to maintain the
connection is to provide two ways in and out
of the area.
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that it is
not on the meeting agenda to change Council's
December 4th vote on the issue. He pointed
out that this is not a public hearing. He did
not think the safety considerations have
changed and stated that he appreciates that
many in the neighborhood strongly prefer the
cul-de-sac but that at the last meeting there
were also many who felt the connection should
be saved. He pointed out that safety is the
Page No. 2982
December 18, 1990
main issue and that if the City must pay
$30,000 for the utility reconstruction, it
should do so and retain the connection.
Mrs. Linsmaier reviewed her letter to Council
and felt that the Council should reconsider
its action for three new reasons brought out
since the last meeting, the School District
Transportation Director has told her that he
feels the cul-de-sac would be safer from a
school bus safety perspective, the Glenhill
residents overwhelming support the cul-de-sac,
and Mn/DOT feels the cul-de-sac is the best
option.
Council also heard comments from Mr. John
Clemency, Mr. Nick Linsmaier, and Mr. Gerald
Shaughnessy.
Ma or Mertensotto stated that from a planning
sta oint the Council always wants to have
two s of ingress and egress - with a
cul-de-sac, the neighborhood would only have
one access.
With respect to Mrs. Linsmaier's comments on
the school district transportation director's
comments, Councilmember Blesener responded
that Council's action was to direct Mn/DOT to
design a safe s -curve, and that if Mn/DOT did
not feel the current design is safe, they
would not build it, nor would the City allow
it. She also stated that in her opinion there
would be a very measurable negative impact on
a few homes on Culligan Lane if the frontage
road access to the neighborhood were closed,
as weighed against the desires of the Glenhill
neighborhood. She stated that if she could be
convinced that the Culligan Lane residents
would support the cul-de-sac, she would be
willing to reconsider her position.
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that
Council must consider issues such as safety
and public safety ingress and egress and that
the decision made on December 4th continues to
make sense this evening.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he felt
rushed to a decision last meeting and that he
thinks Council voted based on misinformation
and circumstances have changed. He stated
that the first Mn/DOT letter did not indicate
to him that they felt the cul-de-sac was
Page No. 2982
December 18, 1990
main issue and that if the City must pay
$30,000 for the utility reconstruction, it
should do so and retain the connection.
Mrs. Linsmaier reviewed her letter to Council
and felt that the Council should reconsider
its action for three new reasons brought out
since the last meeting, the School District
Transportation Director has told her that he
feels the cul-de-sac would be safer from a
school bus safety perspective, the Glenhill
residents overwhelming support the cul-de-sac,
and Mn/DOT feels the cul-de-sac is the best
option.
Council also heard comments from Mr. John
Clemency, Mr. Nick Linsmaier, and Mr. Gerald
Shaughnessy.
Ma or Mertensotto stated that from a planning
sta oint the Council always wants to have
two s of ingress and egress - with a
cul-de-sac, the neighborhood would only have
one access.
With respect to Mrs. Linsmaier's comments on
the school district transportation director's
comments, Councilmember Blesener responded
that Council's action was to direct Mn/DOT to
design a safe s -curve, and that if Mn/DOT did
not feel the current design is safe, they
would not build it, nor would the City allow
it. She also stated that in her opinion there
would be a very measurable negative impact on
a few homes on Culligan Lane if the frontage
road access to the neighborhood were closed,
as weighed against the desires of the Glenhill
neighborhood. She stated that if she could be
convinced that the Culligan Lane residents
would support the cul-de-sac, she would be
willing to reconsider her position.
Councilmember Anderson pointed out that
Council must consider issues such as safety
and public safety ingress and egress and that
the decision made on December 4th continues to
make sense this evening.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he felt
rushed to a decision last meeting and that he
thinks Council voted based on misinformation
and circumstances have changed. He stated
that the first Mn/DOT letter did not indicate
to him that they felt the cul-de-sac was
MENDOTA PLAZA ACCESS
IMPROVEMENTS
Page No. 2983
December 18, 1990
better, and that if the school district letter
was reconsidered, it makes sense to support
the cul-de-sac. He pointed out that Council
did not know the City would have to pay
$30,000 to move utilities and also did not
have a definitive recommendation from the
engineering staff. He felt that new
information suggests that perhaps Council
should take more time on the issue and invite
Mn/DOT to talk about their concerns over the
s -curve.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she would
be willing to have a public hearing and invite
Mn/DOT, but that she still feels eight homes
on Culligan would be negatively impacted by
the cul-de-sac, and that unless she can be
convinced that the proposed s -curve will be
less safe than what currently exists she will
not change her position.
Councilmember Anderson stated that Council
considered the factors and voted on December
4th to direct Mn/DOT to design two ways into
the neighborhood. Mn/DOT has returned a plan
proposal that is more safe that what presently
exists - there is less of a gradient. He
urged Council not to reconsider, and felt that
another discussion on the matter would divide
the neighborhood more.
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Public Works Director Danielson
stated that infrastructure replacement funds
can be used to pay for the utility relocation
costs.
Council acknowledged a report from Public
Works Director Danielson with respect to a
petition and waiver of hearing from Paster
Enterprises for improvements to the entrance
to the Mendota Plaza shopping center. Council
also acknowledged a letter from Mn/DOT and
possible intersection revision. Mr. Ed
Paster, and Mr. John Streeter, construction
engineer for Paster Enterprises, were present
for the discussion.
Mr. Paster stated that his request is for a
feasibility study to address the issue of
ingress/egress to the shopping center,
managing traffic on T.H. 149 and helping
traffic get into the center from Dodd and T.H.
110. He stated that he has been in regular
MENDOTA PLAZA ACCESS
IMPROVEMENTS
Page No. 2983
December 18, 1990
better, and that if the school district letter
was reconsidered, it makes sense to support
the cul-de-sac. He pointed out that Council
did not know the City would have to pay
$30,000 to move utilities and also did not
have a definitive recommendation from the
engineering staff. He felt that new
information suggests that perhaps Council
should take more time on the issue and invite
Mn/DOT to talk about their concerns over the
s -curve.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she would
be willing to have a public hearing and invite
Mn/DOT, but that she still feels eight homes
on Culligan would be negatively impacted by
the cul-de-sac, and that unless she can be
convinced that the proposed s -curve will be
less safe than what currently exists she will
not change her position.
Councilmember Anderson stated that Council
considered the factors and voted on December
4th to direct Mn/DOT to design two ways into
the neighborhood. Mn/DOT has returned a plan
proposal that is more safe that what presently
exists - there is less of a gradient. He
urged Council not to reconsider, and felt that
another discussion on the matter would divide
the neighborhood more.
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Public Works Director Danielson
stated that infrastructure replacement funds
can be used to pay for the utility relocation
costs.
Council acknowledged a report from Public
Works Director Danielson with respect to a
petition and waiver of hearing from Paster
Enterprises for improvements to the entrance
to the Mendota Plaza shopping center. Council
also acknowledged a letter from Mn/DOT and
possible intersection revision. Mr. Ed
Paster, and Mr. John Streeter, construction
engineer for Paster Enterprises, were present
for the discussion.
Mr. Paster stated that his request is for a
feasibility study to address the issue of
ingress/egress to the shopping center,
managing traffic on T.H. 149 and helping
traffic get into the center from Dodd and T.H.
110. He stated that he has been in regular
Page No. 2984
December 18, 1990
contact with Chuck Thomey, owner of the Amoco
Station, about the matter.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Hartmann, Mr. Streeter explained that proposed
new access to the center would move the
entrance to the south about 20 to 30 feet.
Councilmember Hartmann was concerned that
moving the access for the center would close
off access to the Amoco Station. He also
cautioned Mr. Paster that the extension of
South Plaza Drive onto the T.H. 149 right-of-
way has been proposed before and many
environmental issues were raised.
Councilmember Blesener asked whether the
second issue raised in the Mn/DOT letter means
that Mn/DOT proposes a change of jurisdiction
for T.H. 149, that it would no longer be a
state highway. Mr. Danielson responded that
there has been discussion over T.H. 149
becoming a county road.
Councilmember Cummins asked where the frontage
road in phase two would go - the easterly
extension leads off into the Dodge Nature
Center. Mr. Streeter responded that it will
extend east a given distance, not all the way
to Delaware, and will then access T.H. 110.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the applicants
have outlined a possible solution to the
access problems and have asked for a
feasibility study, and have agreed to
submitting a feasibility escrow. He suggested
that the study be in two phases, looking at
planning and options in the first phase and
stopping short of the surveying, etc..
Mr. Streeter asked that the whole study be
prepared, and informed Council that Paster
Enterprises has been working on ingress/egress
for a long time and if the issue keeps
dragging on they are afraid it will get lost
in the "shuffle" of a change in administration
at Mn/DOT. He further stated that Mn/DOT will
pay all construction costs and will reimburse
the City 8% of the total costs for
engineering. Mr. Streeter informed Council
that Paster Enterprises will pay all other
costs.
Page No. 2984
December 18, 1990
contact with Chuck Thomey, owner of the Amoco
Station, about the matter.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Hartmann, Mr. Streeter explained that proposed
new access to the center would move the
entrance to the south about 20 to 30 feet.
Councilmember Hartmann was concerned that
moving the access for the center would close
off access to the Amoco Station. He also
cautioned Mr. Paster that the extension of
South Plaza Drive onto the T.H. 149 right-of-
way has been proposed before and many
environmental issues were raised.
Councilmember Blesener asked whether the
second issue raised in the Mn/DOT letter means
that Mn/DOT proposes a change of jurisdiction
for T.H. 149, that it would no longer be a
state highway. Mr. Danielson responded that
there has been discussion over T.H. 149
becoming a county road.
Councilmember Cummins asked where the frontage
road in phase two would go - the easterly
extension leads off into the Dodge Nature
Center. Mr. Streeter responded that it will
extend east a given distance, not all the way
to Delaware, and will then access T.H. 110.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the applicants
have outlined a possible solution to the
access problems and have asked for a
feasibility study, and have agreed to
submitting a feasibility escrow. He suggested
that the study be in two phases, looking at
planning and options in the first phase and
stopping short of the surveying, etc..
Mr. Streeter asked that the whole study be
prepared, and informed Council that Paster
Enterprises has been working on ingress/egress
for a long time and if the issue keeps
dragging on they are afraid it will get lost
in the "shuffle" of a change in administration
at Mn/DOT. He further stated that Mn/DOT will
pay all construction costs and will reimburse
the City 8% of the total costs for
engineering. Mr. Streeter informed Council
that Paster Enterprises will pay all other
costs.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
HRA GRANTS
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PARK CONTRACTS FINAL
PAYMENTS
Page No. 2985
December 18, 1990
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-90, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MENDOTA
PLAZA," and to direct staff to prepare a
preliminary report part way through the study
process, by the second meeting in March,
subject to receipt of a $2,500 escrow from
Paster Enterprises.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a report from
Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding
an application for HRA community development
block grant funding for assessment abatement,
in the Furlong neighborhood. Mr. Batchelder
stated the application would encompass the
City's CDBG allocation for 1991 along with the
carry over of funding from 1988 through 1990,
for a total of $102,000.
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-91, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING
THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING."
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins was temporarily excused
from the meeting.
Council acknowledged and discussed memos from
Public Works Director Danielson regarding
final payments to G.M.H. Asphalt Corporation
for neighborhood park and trail improvements
and a change order and semi-final payment to
G.M.H. for Sibley Athletic Complex
improvements.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Anderson, Mr. Danielson stated that those
items which are found to be deficient in the
spring, such as seeding, will have to be
corrected by the contractor. Council
discussed the staff -recommended settlements
for liquidated damages.
Mayor Mertensotto felt that the City should
not include a liquidated damages clause in its
contracts because the City ends up paying a
higher cost for the contract as a result.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
HRA GRANTS
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PARK CONTRACTS FINAL
PAYMENTS
Page No. 2985
December 18, 1990
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-90, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MENDOTA
PLAZA," and to direct staff to prepare a
preliminary report part way through the study
process, by the second meeting in March,
subject to receipt of a $2,500 escrow from
Paster Enterprises.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Council acknowledged a report from
Administrative Assistant Batchelder regarding
an application for HRA community development
block grant funding for assessment abatement,
in the Furlong neighborhood. Mr. Batchelder
stated the application would encompass the
City's CDBG allocation for 1991 along with the
carry over of funding from 1988 through 1990,
for a total of $102,000.
Councilmember Hartmann moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-91, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING
THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING."
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins was temporarily excused
from the meeting.
Council acknowledged and discussed memos from
Public Works Director Danielson regarding
final payments to G.M.H. Asphalt Corporation
for neighborhood park and trail improvements
and a change order and semi-final payment to
G.M.H. for Sibley Athletic Complex
improvements.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Anderson, Mr. Danielson stated that those
items which are found to be deficient in the
spring, such as seeding, will have to be
corrected by the contractor. Council
discussed the staff -recommended settlements
for liquidated damages.
Mayor Mertensotto felt that the City should
not include a liquidated damages clause in its
contracts because the City ends up paying a
higher cost for the contract as a result.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
UNITED PROPERTIES/
FISERV
Page No. 2986
December 18, 1990
After discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved
to approve Change Order No.1 to the
Neighborhood Park improvements contract,
totalling $1,173.00 and Change Order No. 1 to
the Paved Walkway improvements contract,
totalling $1,357.00.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins returned to the meeting.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-92, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR
IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 6D," and
Resolution No. 90-93, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR
IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 6B."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Blesener moved approval of
Change Order No. 1 for the Sibley Athletic
Complex contract totalling $7,686.75, along
with semi-final payment of $22,717.05 to
G.M.H. Asphalt, Inc. for Sibley Athletic
Complex improvements.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Properties, was
present to request Council approval of a
building permit, parking space number and size
variances and a sign setback variance to allow
construction of a building for FiServ, Inc. in
the Mendota Heights Business Park (Acacia),
along with a request for feasibility study for
the extension of Lemay Avenue. Mr. Glowa also
requested approval for Tax Increment Financing
support in the form of up front cost write-
downs and a "Pay -As -You -Go" benefit.
Mr. Glowa informed Council that his firm
requests approval of the building permit
subject to approval of final plans by City
staff. The variances requested are for a
reduction in parking space size from 9 feet to
8 feet 6 inches and a 4/1000 square foot of
office area parking ratio, and a sign setback
of 20 feet from Lemay Avenue. He informed
Council that the preliminary plat has been
approved and that he will be requesting final
Ayes: 4
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
UNITED PROPERTIES/
FISERV
Page No. 2986
December 18, 1990
After discussion, Councilmember Blesener moved
to approve Change Order No.1 to the
Neighborhood Park improvements contract,
totalling $1,173.00 and Change Order No. 1 to
the Paved Walkway improvements contract,
totalling $1,357.00.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins returned to the meeting.
Councilmember Blesener moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-92, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR
IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 6D," and
Resolution No. 90-93, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR
IMPROVEMENT NO. 89, PROJECT NO. 6B."
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Councilmember Blesener moved approval of
Change Order No. 1 for the Sibley Athletic
Complex contract totalling $7,686.75, along
with semi-final payment of $22,717.05 to
G.M.H. Asphalt, Inc. for Sibley Athletic
Complex improvements.
Councilmember Hartmann seconded the motion.
Mr. Dale Glowa, from United Properties, was
present to request Council approval of a
building permit, parking space number and size
variances and a sign setback variance to allow
construction of a building for FiServ, Inc. in
the Mendota Heights Business Park (Acacia),
along with a request for feasibility study for
the extension of Lemay Avenue. Mr. Glowa also
requested approval for Tax Increment Financing
support in the form of up front cost write-
downs and a "Pay -As -You -Go" benefit.
Mr. Glowa informed Council that his firm
requests approval of the building permit
subject to approval of final plans by City
staff. The variances requested are for a
reduction in parking space size from 9 feet to
8 feet 6 inches and a 4/1000 square foot of
office area parking ratio, and a sign setback
of 20 feet from Lemay Avenue. He informed
Council that the preliminary plat has been
approved and that he will be requesting final
Page No. 2987
December 18, 1990
plat approval. He explained that United
Properties is still negotiating the lease
agreement. FiServ's immediate need is for a
30,000 square foot building, but it is in the
process of acquiring another local firm and,
if this is accomplished, FiServe would need a
50,000 to 60,000 square foot building.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the original TIF
request was for $600,000 but that he has
recently been approached with a request to
consider increasing the amount to $675,000.
He felt that the $600,000 TIF contribution can
be justified, but that he would not support
the increase.
Mr. Glowa informed Council that the proposed
structure would be the headquarters of the
FiSery Company, and would be located in the
southwest quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and
proposed Lemay Avenue on a 4.5 acre parcel
across from Big Wheel. Access will be totally
from Lemay Avenue, and truck docks will be
located at the back of the building. Mr.
Glowa stated that 75% of the building would be
office finish. He reviewed the landscaping
plan for Council. He informed Council that he
has not requested a setback variance but that
at the back of the site there is a 30 foot
minimum setback to the right-of-way, by
ordinance. He suggested that the City might
wish to consider pushing the building closer
to the rear property line to provide more
green area along Lemay. He stated that there
it is 120 feet from the property line to the
closest highway surface proposed for T.H. 13.
Mr. Glowa reviewed an elevation sketch of the
building, informing Council that it will be
Fabcon type panel, painted with graphic
banding and a ribbon of glass around the
office element of the building and that the
front of the building will be "sawtoothed."
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Mr. Glowa indicated that he is
asking for a variance from the required number
of parking spaces to provide additional
greenspace, and that should it ever become
necessary for future expansion of the
building, the area is available for additional
parking. He informed Council that United
Properties will maintain the extensive
landscaping characteristics as exist in the
rest of the business park.
Page No. 2987
December 18, 1990
plat approval. He explained that United
Properties is still negotiating the lease
agreement. FiServ's immediate need is for a
30,000 square foot building, but it is in the
process of acquiring another local firm and,
if this is accomplished, FiServe would need a
50,000 to 60,000 square foot building.
Mayor Mertensotto stated that the original TIF
request was for $600,000 but that he has
recently been approached with a request to
consider increasing the amount to $675,000.
He felt that the $600,000 TIF contribution can
be justified, but that he would not support
the increase.
Mr. Glowa informed Council that the proposed
structure would be the headquarters of the
FiSery Company, and would be located in the
southwest quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and
proposed Lemay Avenue on a 4.5 acre parcel
across from Big Wheel. Access will be totally
from Lemay Avenue, and truck docks will be
located at the back of the building. Mr.
Glowa stated that 75% of the building would be
office finish. He reviewed the landscaping
plan for Council. He informed Council that he
has not requested a setback variance but that
at the back of the site there is a 30 foot
minimum setback to the right-of-way, by
ordinance. He suggested that the City might
wish to consider pushing the building closer
to the rear property line to provide more
green area along Lemay. He stated that there
it is 120 feet from the property line to the
closest highway surface proposed for T.H. 13.
Mr. Glowa reviewed an elevation sketch of the
building, informing Council that it will be
Fabcon type panel, painted with graphic
banding and a ribbon of glass around the
office element of the building and that the
front of the building will be "sawtoothed."
Responding to a question from Mayor
Mertensotto, Mr. Glowa indicated that he is
asking for a variance from the required number
of parking spaces to provide additional
greenspace, and that should it ever become
necessary for future expansion of the
building, the area is available for additional
parking. He informed Council that United
Properties will maintain the extensive
landscaping characteristics as exist in the
rest of the business park.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2988
December 18, 1990
Councilmember Blesener commented that the
style of the buildings in this part of the
business park are quite different that in the
other half of the park, and asked if this
building will set the tone for the remainder
of the development. Mr. Glowa responded that
it will, and that this is much more of an
industrial building design and reflects the
character of the land. The site is too far
away from the highways for firms to wish to
spend as much money on design as the first
half of the business park.
Councilmember Cummins asked what the degree of
urgency is to get all of the requested
approvals this evening. Mr. Glowa responded
that the project must start immediately,
planning a 50,000 square foot design with the
flexibility to shorten the structure to 30,000
square feet. The reduction in size of the
building would come on the west end of the
structure.
Treasurer Shaughnessy explained the TIF
request for Council, stating that most of the
$600,000 would be reimbursed to the developer
in the future, and only a small portion would
be used up front, for Lemay Avenue.
Councilmember Blesener moved to approve Tax
Increment support for the project totaling no
more than $600,000, on the "Pay -As -You -Go"
plan.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to waive Planning
Commission review with respect to the variance
requests; to approve the building permit for
the FiSery project based on sketches and
drawings presented to Council this evening; to
authorize issuance of a building permit
subject to final staff review and approval of
grading, landscaping and building plans; and
to grant approval for parking stall number and
size variances and sign setback variance
consistent with the existing business park,
all subject to completion of a final plat.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-94, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2988
December 18, 1990
Councilmember Blesener commented that the
style of the buildings in this part of the
business park are quite different that in the
other half of the park, and asked if this
building will set the tone for the remainder
of the development. Mr. Glowa responded that
it will, and that this is much more of an
industrial building design and reflects the
character of the land. The site is too far
away from the highways for firms to wish to
spend as much money on design as the first
half of the business park.
Councilmember Cummins asked what the degree of
urgency is to get all of the requested
approvals this evening. Mr. Glowa responded
that the project must start immediately,
planning a 50,000 square foot design with the
flexibility to shorten the structure to 30,000
square feet. The reduction in size of the
building would come on the west end of the
structure.
Treasurer Shaughnessy explained the TIF
request for Council, stating that most of the
$600,000 would be reimbursed to the developer
in the future, and only a small portion would
be used up front, for Lemay Avenue.
Councilmember Blesener moved to approve Tax
Increment support for the project totaling no
more than $600,000, on the "Pay -As -You -Go"
plan.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved to waive Planning
Commission review with respect to the variance
requests; to approve the building permit for
the FiSery project based on sketches and
drawings presented to Council this evening; to
authorize issuance of a building permit
subject to final staff review and approval of
grading, landscaping and building plans; and
to grant approval for parking stall number and
size variances and sign setback variance
consistent with the existing business park,
all subject to completion of a final plat.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Cummins moved adoption of
Resolution No. 90-94, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
MENDAKOTA PARK
Page No. 2989
December 18, 1990
PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR LEMAY AVENUE EXTENSION
(MAC SITE, IMPROVEMENT NO. 90, PROJECT NO.
5).n
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Park and Recreation Commission Chairperson
John Huber and Parks Project Manager Guy
Kullander were present to review the proposed
final schematic for the Mendakota Park. Mr.
Huber reviewed the changes made in the plan
since the December 4th Council discussion.
Mr. Kullander informed Council that a
potential future tennis court is shown in the
northwest corner of the site, and that it will
be included in the plans and specifications as
a separate bid item. If the bid is within
reason, the neighborhood would pay for the
court and donate it to the City.
Councilmember Blesener asked if the hard court
can be fenced and double as a tennis court.
Mr. Huber responded that he does not know, but
that he will raise the issue with Barry
Warner. In addition, Mr. Huber informed
Council that the plan would facilitate putting
in ballfield lights some day but that they are
not planned for the near future.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Blesener with respect to additional
landscaping in the center area between the
fields and the comfort station, Mr. Kullander
responded that Mr. Warner intends to use a
treatment similar to the Sibley comfort
station and that there will be some plantings
within the blacktop area. Mr. Kullander also
informed Council that the Park Commission, at
its last meeting, discussed a request that a
deck be constructed on top of the comfort
station.
Mr. Jim Kilburg showed Council pictures of a
comfort station in Eagan which has an
observation deck. He explained that the
Mendakota site is laid out great for
ballplayers but•that it is limited for
spectators. A deck would provide a way for
the spectators to get out of the elements and
have a good view of all of the fields. He
also felt that it would ease some of the
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
MENDAKOTA PARK
Page No. 2989
December 18, 1990
PETITION AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR LEMAY AVENUE EXTENSION
(MAC SITE, IMPROVEMENT NO. 90, PROJECT NO.
5).n
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
Park and Recreation Commission Chairperson
John Huber and Parks Project Manager Guy
Kullander were present to review the proposed
final schematic for the Mendakota Park. Mr.
Huber reviewed the changes made in the plan
since the December 4th Council discussion.
Mr. Kullander informed Council that a
potential future tennis court is shown in the
northwest corner of the site, and that it will
be included in the plans and specifications as
a separate bid item. If the bid is within
reason, the neighborhood would pay for the
court and donate it to the City.
Councilmember Blesener asked if the hard court
can be fenced and double as a tennis court.
Mr. Huber responded that he does not know, but
that he will raise the issue with Barry
Warner. In addition, Mr. Huber informed
Council that the plan would facilitate putting
in ballfield lights some day but that they are
not planned for the near future.
Responding to a question from Councilmember
Blesener with respect to additional
landscaping in the center area between the
fields and the comfort station, Mr. Kullander
responded that Mr. Warner intends to use a
treatment similar to the Sibley comfort
station and that there will be some plantings
within the blacktop area. Mr. Kullander also
informed Council that the Park Commission, at
its last meeting, discussed a request that a
deck be constructed on top of the comfort
station.
Mr. Jim Kilburg showed Council pictures of a
comfort station in Eagan which has an
observation deck. He explained that the
Mendakota site is laid out great for
ballplayers but•that it is limited for
spectators. A deck would provide a way for
the spectators to get out of the elements and
have a good view of all of the fields. He
also felt that it would ease some of the
Page No. 2990
December 18, 1990
congestion of people walking around the
comfort station.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern that the
stairway to the deck might create hazards for
small children. He also felt that the deck
would be difficult to police and could become
a loft area.
Councilmember Blesener suggested that if the
Mayor is concerned, there could be an open
railing rather than a sidewall around the
deck. She stated that Mendakota park should
be a community park and that a small feature
like the deck would add to the development in
total.
Mr. Kullander informed Council that the
building will be about 512 square feet and
that the second floor (deck) could be enlarged
to 600 square feet. It will be necessary to
provide two stair cases. Responding to the
Mayor's concerns, Mr. Huber stated that there
will need to be some type of security
lighting. Mr. Kullander stated that staff
will look at widening the area between the
fields to provide access for squad cars.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she would
like to see one half of the parking lot bid as
an alternate and also that she would like to
have the comfort station architect look at
design of the picnic shelter and future band
shell to carry design similarity.
Councilmember Blesener moved to order
preparation of plans and specifications for
the Mendakota Park improvements based on plans
presented for discussion this evening,
including the addition of an observation deck
on the comfort station.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PARK IMPROVEMENT COSTS Council acknowledged a memo from Parks Project
Manager Kullander regarding future
expenditures for park improvements. It was
the consensus of Council that the Park
Commission be requested to prepare a needs and
priorities list for all unbuilt trail segments
and park improvements and identify funding
sources.
Page No. 2990
December 18, 1990
congestion of people walking around the
comfort station.
Mayor Mertensotto expressed concern that the
stairway to the deck might create hazards for
small children. He also felt that the deck
would be difficult to police and could become
a loft area.
Councilmember Blesener suggested that if the
Mayor is concerned, there could be an open
railing rather than a sidewall around the
deck. She stated that Mendakota park should
be a community park and that a small feature
like the deck would add to the development in
total.
Mr. Kullander informed Council that the
building will be about 512 square feet and
that the second floor (deck) could be enlarged
to 600 square feet. It will be necessary to
provide two stair cases. Responding to the
Mayor's concerns, Mr. Huber stated that there
will need to be some type of security
lighting. Mr. Kullander stated that staff
will look at widening the area between the
fields to provide access for squad cars.
Councilmember Blesener stated that she would
like to see one half of the parking lot bid as
an alternate and also that she would like to
have the comfort station architect look at
design of the picnic shelter and future band
shell to carry design similarity.
Councilmember Blesener moved to order
preparation of plans and specifications for
the Mendakota Park improvements based on plans
presented for discussion this evening,
including the addition of an observation deck
on the comfort station.
Councilmember Cummins seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PARK IMPROVEMENT COSTS Council acknowledged a memo from Parks Project
Manager Kullander regarding future
expenditures for park improvements. It was
the consensus of Council that the Park
Commission be requested to prepare a needs and
priorities list for all unbuilt trail segments
and park improvements and identify funding
sources.
RESCHEDULED MEETING
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2991
December 18, 1990
Councilmember Cummins moved that the regular
meeting scheduled for January 1st be
rescheduled to 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, January
2, 1991.
Councilmember Biesener seconded the motion.
COUNCIL COMMENDATIONS Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that
Councilmembers Hartmann and Anderson are
participating in their final meeting as
Council members. He expressed appreciation to
both Councilmembers for their service to the
community.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember
Resolution No.
COUNCILMEMBER
Councilmember
Councilmember
Resolution No.
COUNCILMEMBER
Councilmember
Biesener moved adoption of
90-88, "RESOLUTION COMMENDING
JOHN HARTMANN."
Cummins seconded the motion.
Cummins moved adoption of
90-89, "RESOLUTION COMMENDING
BURT ANDERSON."
Biesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Hartmann stated that during his
12 years on the Council he can attest to a
number of changes, including construction of
the Public Works Garage, Fire Station and City
Hall. During his tenure there have been three
City Administrators, two Mayors and three new
Councilmembers. He expressed appreciation to
his wife Kathy for her understanding and
sacrifices. He also expressed appreciation to
the City staff.
Councilmember Anderson stated that he feels
fortunate to have had the opportunity to serve
the community and that he hopes that the City
Council meets the measure set by City staff.
He further stated that as a citizen he will
miss Councilmember Hartmann.
Councilmember Biesener stated that she will
miss both Councilmember Anderson and Hartmann
and that she hopes they will continue to be
involved in City activities.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he has had
an opportunity to work with the state and
federal levels of government where things are
RESCHEDULED MEETING
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2991
December 18, 1990
Councilmember Cummins moved that the regular
meeting scheduled for January 1st be
rescheduled to 7:30 P.M. on Wednesday, January
2, 1991.
Councilmember Biesener seconded the motion.
COUNCIL COMMENDATIONS Mayor Mertensotto informed the audience that
Councilmembers Hartmann and Anderson are
participating in their final meeting as
Council members. He expressed appreciation to
both Councilmembers for their service to the
community.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember
Resolution No.
COUNCILMEMBER
Councilmember
Councilmember
Resolution No.
COUNCILMEMBER
Councilmember
Biesener moved adoption of
90-88, "RESOLUTION COMMENDING
JOHN HARTMANN."
Cummins seconded the motion.
Cummins moved adoption of
90-89, "RESOLUTION COMMENDING
BURT ANDERSON."
Biesener seconded the motion.
Councilmember Hartmann stated that during his
12 years on the Council he can attest to a
number of changes, including construction of
the Public Works Garage, Fire Station and City
Hall. During his tenure there have been three
City Administrators, two Mayors and three new
Councilmembers. He expressed appreciation to
his wife Kathy for her understanding and
sacrifices. He also expressed appreciation to
the City staff.
Councilmember Anderson stated that he feels
fortunate to have had the opportunity to serve
the community and that he hopes that the City
Council meets the measure set by City staff.
He further stated that as a citizen he will
miss Councilmember Hartmann.
Councilmember Biesener stated that she will
miss both Councilmember Anderson and Hartmann
and that she hopes they will continue to be
involved in City activities.
Councilmember Cummins stated that he has had
an opportunity to work with the state and
federal levels of government where things are
ADJOURN
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2992
December 18, 1990
frequently partisan. He commented that what
has motivated Councilmembers Hartmann and
Anderson is that they are consistently looking
for what is best for the citizens and the
community and that partisan politics get no
consideration.
There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that
the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:30 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ADJOURN
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Page No. 2992
December 18, 1990
frequently partisan. He commented that what
has motivated Councilmembers Hartmann and
Anderson is that they are consistently looking
for what is best for the citizens and the
community and that partisan politics get no
consideration.
There being no further business to come before
the Council, Councilmember Hartmann moved that
the meeting be adjourned.
Councilmember Blesener seconded the motion.
TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:30 o'clock P.M.
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
ATTEST:
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMO
Date: 12-26-90
Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
Building Activity Report for December 1990
CURRENT MONTH
YEAR TO DATE 90 YEAR TO DATE 89
BUILDING
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected
SFD 2 333,021.00 2,884.20 74 12,118,944.00 104,876.89 91 14,594,596.00 127,528.79
APT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOWNHOUSE 4 708,130.00 6,010.96 10 1,424,824.00 12,933.55 17 2,347,486.00 21,599.15
CONDO 0 0 0 16 1,278,376.00 8,116.36 43 4,309,292.00 26,308.46
MISC. 14 161,805.00 2,820.46 233 1,844,218.00 33,167.02 218 1,904,632.00 33,703.60
C/I 8 1,136,335.00 7,934.96 52 6,571,693.00 43,502.01 52 6,858,380.00 41,899.85
Sub Total 28 2,339,291.00 19,650.58 385 23,238,055.00 202,595.83 421 30,014,386.00 251,039.85
TRADE
PERMITS:
Plumbing 14 673.00 134 6,339.00 181 4,669.00
Water 11 55.00 124 620.00 173 865.00
Sewer 8 140.00 112 1,960.00 148 2,590.00
Heat, AC,
& Gas 16 1,078.00 173 19,929.85 226 20,904.50
Sub Total 49 1,946.00 543 28,848.85 728 29,028.50
Licensing:
Contractor's
Licenses 16
400.00
488
12,200.00
495 12,375.00
Total 93 2,339,291.00 21,996.58 11416 23,238,055.00 243,644.68 11644 30,014,386.00 292,443.35
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and
valuation amounts.
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MEMO
Date: 12-26-90
Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
Paul R. Berg, Code Enforcement Officer
Building Activity Report for December 1990
CURRENT MONTH
YEAR TO DATE 90 YEAR TO DATE 89
BUILDING
PERMITS: No. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected No. Valuation Fee Collected
SFD 2 333,021.00 2,884.20 74 12,118,944.00 104,876.89 91 14,594,596.00 127,528.79
APT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOWNHOUSE 4 708,130.00 6,010.96 10 1,424,824.00 12,933.55 17 2,347,486.00 21,599.15
CONDO 0 0 0 16 1,278,376.00 8,116.36 43 4,309,292.00 26,308.46
MISC. 14 161,805.00 2,820.46 233 1,844,218.00 33,167.02 218 1,904,632.00 33,703.60
C/I 8 1,136,335.00 7,934.96 52 6,571,693.00 43,502.01 52 6,858,380.00 41,899.85
Sub Total 28 2,339,291.00 19,650.58 385 23,238,055.00 202,595.83 421 30,014,386.00 251,039.85
TRADE
PERMITS:
Plumbing 14 673.00 134 6,339.00 181 4,669.00
Water 11 55.00 124 620.00 173 865.00
Sewer 8 140.00 112 1,960.00 148 2,590.00
Heat, AC,
& Gas 16 1,078.00 173 19,929.85 226 20,904.50
Sub Total 49 1,946.00 543 28,848.85 728 29,028.50
Licensing:
Contractor's
Licenses 16
400.00
488
12,200.00
495 12,375.00
Total 93 2,339,291.00 21,996.58 11416 23,238,055.00 243,644.68 11644 30,014,386.00 292,443.35
NOTE: All fee amounts exclude Sac, Wac, and State Surcharge. Amounts shown will reflect only permit, plan check fee, and
valuation amounts.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 18, 1990
To: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative
Subject: 1991 Amendments to Recycling Joint Powers Agreement
DISCUSSION
ant
In September of 1990, the City Council approved the 1991
Funding Application for the Community Landfill Abatement Program
funding for Mendota Heights' Recycling Program. This application
requested the maximum amount ($48,527) available from Dakota
County's Landfill Abatement Fund. The application also described
the types of recycling activities we would be involved in for 1991.
Dakota County has approved both our requested funding amount
and our proposed recycling activities. To move forward with our
1991 Recycling Program we must amend the existing 1990 Joint Powers
Agreement. I have attached a copy for your review. The only
amendments are the new funding amounts and an increase in the
abatement goals.
ACTION REQUIRED
If the Council so desires, they should pass amotion
authorizing the Mayor to sign the amended Joint Powers Agreement
and enter into agreement with Dakota County for the 1990 Recycling
Program.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 18, 1990
To: Mayor, City Council and City Adminis
From: Kevin Batchelder, Administrative
Subject: 1991 Amendments to Recycling Joint Powers Agreement
DISCUSSION
ant
In September of 1990, the City Council approved the 1991
Funding Application for the Community Landfill Abatement Program
funding for Mendota Heights' Recycling Program. This application
requested the maximum amount ($48,527) available from Dakota
County's Landfill Abatement Fund. The application also described
the types of recycling activities we would be involved in for 1991.
Dakota County has approved both our requested funding amount
and our proposed recycling activities. To move forward with our
1991 Recycling Program we must amend the existing 1990 Joint Powers
Agreement. I have attached a copy for your review. The only
amendments are the new funding amounts and an increase in the
abatement goals.
ACTION REQUIRED
If the Council so desires, they should pass amotion
authorizing the Mayor to sign the amended Joint Powers Agreement
and enter into agreement with Dakota County for the 1990 Recycling
Program.
r --
DAKOTA COUNTY
JEFFREY J. CONNELL
DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT (612) 431-1158
7300 WEST 147th STREET, SUITE 4503 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124
MEMORANDUM
TO: Local Solid Waste Staff
FROM: Gayle A. Prest, Recycling Speciali ' U/5161\64_
DATE: December 7, 1990
SUBJECT: 1991 Amendments to Joint Powers Agreements
Enclosed please find the amendment to the Joint Powers
Agreement between Dakota County and your city which reflects
the 1991 program and funding.
Please see that the appropriate city official signs the
amendment and that it is notarized before returning it to
me. Once it has been executed by the County, I will send
you a c.�
In order to release your first 1991 payment by February 1,
the amendment must be returned to me no later than January
If you have any questions or concerns do not hesitate to
contact me.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
r --
DAKOTA COUNTY
JEFFREY J. CONNELL
DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT (612) 431-1158
7300 WEST 147th STREET, SUITE 4503 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124
MEMORANDUM
TO: Local Solid Waste Staff
FROM: Gayle A. Prest, Recycling Speciali ' U/5161\64_
DATE: December 7, 1990
SUBJECT: 1991 Amendments to Joint Powers Agreements
Enclosed please find the amendment to the Joint Powers
Agreement between Dakota County and your city which reflects
the 1991 program and funding.
Please see that the appropriate city official signs the
amendment and that it is notarized before returning it to
me. Once it has been executed by the County, I will send
you a c.�
In order to release your first 1991 payment by February 1,
the amendment must be returned to me no later than January
If you have any questions or concerns do not hesitate to
contact me.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
AMENDMENT TO 1989 1990 CONTRACT BETWEEN
COUNTY OF DAKOTA AND THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
WHEREAS, the County and the City of Mendota Heights, hereinafter
"Municipality", entered into a contract for the provision of the funding
of landfill abatement programs, specifically recycling activities; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Contract so as to enable both
parties to continue to enjoy the mutual benefits it provides; and
WHEREAS, Paragraph 17 of the Contract provides that any amendments
shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the
parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein the parties agree that said Contract regarding funding is hereby
amended as follows:
1. Exhibit A. is amended by the addition of -Part III consisting of the
"RSWC" 1991 Funding application.
2. Paragraph 3b, as stated below, is inserted after Paragraph 3a "Program
Budget: '1990".
3b Program Budget: 1991
The amount payable in 1991 shall not exceed Forty Eight Thousand Five
Hundred Twenty Seven Dollars ($ 48,527), which includes a carryover of
Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($ 5,850) from 1990,
funding. This is funding that was disbursed in 1990 but unspent. The
Dakota County Physical Development*Director or his designee shall have
the authority to approve modifications to Exhibit A, Part III as
requested by the Municipality, so long as the proposed modifications
do not exceed this amount and are consistent with the County's
guidelines.
3. Paragraph 4b, as stated below, is inserted afterParagraph 4a "Payment
Schedule and Annual Report: 1990."
4b Payment Schedule and Annual Report: 1991
The County will pay the Municipality the grant amount specified in
Paragraph 3b in four (4) equal installments, upon County receipt and
Page 1 of 3
AMENDMENT TO 1989 1990 CONTRACT BETWEEN
COUNTY OF DAKOTA AND THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
WHEREAS, the County and the City of Mendota Heights, hereinafter
"Municipality", entered into a contract for the provision of the funding
of landfill abatement programs, specifically recycling activities; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Contract so as to enable both
parties to continue to enjoy the mutual benefits it provides; and
WHEREAS, Paragraph 17 of the Contract provides that any amendments
shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the
parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained
herein the parties agree that said Contract regarding funding is hereby
amended as follows:
1. Exhibit A. is amended by the addition of -Part III consisting of the
"RSWC" 1991 Funding application.
2. Paragraph 3b, as stated below, is inserted after Paragraph 3a "Program
Budget: '1990".
3b Program Budget: 1991
The amount payable in 1991 shall not exceed Forty Eight Thousand Five
Hundred Twenty Seven Dollars ($ 48,527), which includes a carryover of
Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($ 5,850) from 1990,
funding. This is funding that was disbursed in 1990 but unspent. The
Dakota County Physical Development*Director or his designee shall have
the authority to approve modifications to Exhibit A, Part III as
requested by the Municipality, so long as the proposed modifications
do not exceed this amount and are consistent with the County's
guidelines.
3. Paragraph 4b, as stated below, is inserted afterParagraph 4a "Payment
Schedule and Annual Report: 1990."
4b Payment Schedule and Annual Report: 1991
The County will pay the Municipality the grant amount specified in
Paragraph 3b in four (4) equal installments, upon County receipt and
Page 1 of 3
approval of progress reports, as follows:
February 1, 1991
May 1, 1991
August 1, 1991
November 1, 1991
Progress reports shall be submitted in the form prescribed by the
County.
By January 30, 1992, the Municipality shall submit its 1991 Annual
Report in the form prescribed by the County. The County shall
evaluate the Municipality's 1991 performance pursuant to this
Agreement. The following evaluation formula shall be utilized:
achievement of 14% residential
recycling rate (only 25% of tonnage
used to calculate may be yardwaste)
75 points
(5.36 points per 1%)
conduct promotional programs as 25 points
outlined in Exhibit A, Part III
The Municipality will reimburse the County the following percentages
of funds paid pursuant to Paragraph 3 based on the following
evaluation scores:
0 - 50 points 50%
51 - 75 points 25%
76 - 90 points 10%
91 - 100 points 0%
If the Municipality receives funding pursuant to this Agreement in
1992, such reimbursement shall be deducted from the 1992 payments by
the County to the Municipality. If the Municipality does not receive
such funding in 1992, such reimbursement shall be made by February 28,
1992.
Monies received under this Agreement or assets acquired with funds
provided under this Agreement which are not used for or do not
continue in use for a County -approved landfill abatement project shall
be repaid or returned to the County.
4. In any case where this Amendment conflicts with the earlier Contract,
this Amendment shall govern.
Page 2 of 3
approval of progress reports, as follows:
February 1, 1991
May 1, 1991
August 1, 1991
November 1, 1991
Progress reports shall be submitted in the form prescribed by the
County.
By January 30, 1992, the Municipality shall submit its 1991 Annual
Report in the form prescribed by the County. The County shall
evaluate the Municipality's 1991 performance pursuant to this
Agreement. The following evaluation formula shall be utilized:
achievement of 14% residential
recycling rate (only 25% of tonnage
used to calculate may be yardwaste)
75 points
(5.36 points per 1%)
conduct promotional programs as 25 points
outlined in Exhibit A, Part III
The Municipality will reimburse the County the following percentages
of funds paid pursuant to Paragraph 3 based on the following
evaluation scores:
0 - 50 points 50%
51 - 75 points 25%
76 - 90 points 10%
91 - 100 points 0%
If the Municipality receives funding pursuant to this Agreement in
1992, such reimbursement shall be deducted from the 1992 payments by
the County to the Municipality. If the Municipality does not receive
such funding in 1992, such reimbursement shall be made by February 28,
1992.
Monies received under this Agreement or assets acquired with funds
provided under this Agreement which are not used for or do not
continue in use for a County -approved landfill abatement project shall
be repaid or returned to the County.
4. In any case where this Amendment conflicts with the earlier Contract,
this Amendment shall govern.
Page 2 of 3
•
•
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the
1989/1990 Contract on the dates indicated below.
Approved as t
/s/qc7
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
Assistant County Attorney/Date Physical Development Director
Approved as to execution:
Assistant County Attorney/Date
Approved by Dakota County Board
Resolution No. 90-819
Date of Signature
STATE OF MINNESOTA) CITY OF
COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) By:
Title
ss.
Date of Signature
Attest:
Corporation/Organization
This instrument was acknowledged before me on
by (title) , of
(company name) , who, being duly sworn,
represents and warrants that he/she/they is/are authorized by law and all
necessary board action to execute this contract on behalf of the
corporation/organization, intending this contract to be a legally binding
obligation of the corporation/organization.
Notary Public
Page 3 of 3
ctycont
•
•
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the
1989/1990 Contract on the dates indicated below.
Approved as t
/s/qc7
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
Assistant County Attorney/Date Physical Development Director
Approved as to execution:
Assistant County Attorney/Date
Approved by Dakota County Board
Resolution No. 90-819
Date of Signature
STATE OF MINNESOTA) CITY OF
COUNTY OF DAKOTA ) By:
Title
ss.
Date of Signature
Attest:
Corporation/Organization
This instrument was acknowledged before me on
by (title) , of
(company name) , who, being duly sworn,
represents and warrants that he/she/they is/are authorized by law and all
necessary board action to execute this contract on behalf of the
corporation/organization, intending this contract to be a legally binding
obligation of the corporation/organization.
Notary Public
Page 3 of 3
ctycont
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1991 CITY DEPOSITORIES OF FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, that the following institutions be designated as
depositories for City funds for 1991:
Dakota County State Bank
Signal Hills State Bank
First Minnesota Savings Bank
Norwest Bank of Minnesota
Cherokee State Bank
Minnesota State Bank
First Bank of Minnesota
American National Bank and
Trust Company of St. Paul
Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that investments of City funds be in
any securities authorized by Minnesota Statutes Chapters 118.17,
475.66 and 471.56.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd
day of January, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 1991 CITY DEPOSITORIES OF FUNDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, that the following institutions be designated as
depositories for City funds for 1991:
Dakota County State Bank
Signal Hills State Bank
First Minnesota Savings Bank
Norwest Bank of Minnesota
Cherokee State Bank
Minnesota State Bank
First Bank of Minnesota
American National Bank and
Trust Company of St. Paul
Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that investments of City funds be in
any securities authorized by Minnesota Statutes Chapters 118.17,
475.66 and 471.56.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd
day of January, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITIES FOR 1991
WHEREAS, every designated depository of City funds must
provide collateral or other security to the City to protect against
financial loss, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 118.01 and
427.01, and
WHEREAS, all financial institutions designated as depositories
for 1991 are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) which provides suitable security up to established limits,
and
WHEREAS, the City's deposits in two financial institutions
routinely exceed these established limits necessitating the
provision of additional security.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following pledged
securities be accepted by the City as additional collateral for
calendar year 1991:
CHEROKEE STATE BANK
$500,000 U.S. Treasury Notes 8 3/8% due 2/15/93
$200,000 8 3/4% 8/15/91
$100,000 7 3/8% 2/15/91
DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK
$134,462 Countrywide Mtg. 7.9% due 3/20/2004
$ 58,119 Countrywide Mtg. 7.95% 11/1/2011
$400,000 FHLMC CMO 8.79% 9/15/2019
$500,000 HLB 8.30% 9/27/93
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd
day of January, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PLEDGED SECURITIES FOR 1991
WHEREAS, every designated depository of City funds must
provide collateral or other security to the City to protect against
financial loss, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 118.01 and
427.01, and
WHEREAS, all financial institutions designated as depositories
for 1991 are members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) which provides suitable security up to established limits,
and
WHEREAS, the City's deposits in two financial institutions
routinely exceed these established limits necessitating the
provision of additional security.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the following pledged
securities be accepted by the City as additional collateral for
calendar year 1991:
CHEROKEE STATE BANK
$500,000 U.S. Treasury Notes 8 3/8% due 2/15/93
$200,000 8 3/4% 8/15/91
$100,000 7 3/8% 2/15/91
DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK
$134,462 Countrywide Mtg. 7.9% due 3/20/2004
$ 58,119 Countrywide Mtg. 7.95% 11/1/2011
$400,000 FHLMC CMO 8.79% 9/15/2019
$500,000 HLB 8.30% 9/27/93
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd
day of January, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 27, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ�
SUBJECT: 1991 Salary Adjustment - Shawn Sanders
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
At our last Council meeting, action was taken on the 1991
Schedule of Compensation for our employees. At that time, I
neglected to include mention of our temporary engineer, Mr. Shawn
Sanders, in the resolution which was provided for your
consideration. It is now recommended that he be considered for a
salary adjustment effective January 1, 1991.
DISCUSSION
Our City engineering function is staffed by four full time
employees, and one or two temporary employees depending upon
project volume and workload. These temporary employees allow us
the opportunity to inexpensively hire graduate engineers who are
looking for practical experience - an arrangement which is mutually
beneficial to both the City and the employee. Past experience
indicates that our temporary engineers typically stay with the City
two to four years and then move on to more responsible engineering
positions elsewhere. Temporary engineers with the City do not
receive full City benefits, but are provided with standard City
holidays.
RECOMMENDATION
As our primary temporary engineer, Mr. Sanders is currently in
his ninth month of employment. During that time he has done an
excellent job and has become an important member of our engineering
team. The attached memo from Public Works Director Danielson
outlines his recommendation for a salary adjustment for Mr.
Sanders, and I am in agreement with his recommendation.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should review the recommendation outlined by Mr.
Danielson and, if in agreement, authorize a wage rate adjustment to
$11.00 per hour for Mr. Shawn Sanders effective January 1, 1991.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 27, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ�
SUBJECT: 1991 Salary Adjustment - Shawn Sanders
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
At our last Council meeting, action was taken on the 1991
Schedule of Compensation for our employees. At that time, I
neglected to include mention of our temporary engineer, Mr. Shawn
Sanders, in the resolution which was provided for your
consideration. It is now recommended that he be considered for a
salary adjustment effective January 1, 1991.
DISCUSSION
Our City engineering function is staffed by four full time
employees, and one or two temporary employees depending upon
project volume and workload. These temporary employees allow us
the opportunity to inexpensively hire graduate engineers who are
looking for practical experience - an arrangement which is mutually
beneficial to both the City and the employee. Past experience
indicates that our temporary engineers typically stay with the City
two to four years and then move on to more responsible engineering
positions elsewhere. Temporary engineers with the City do not
receive full City benefits, but are provided with standard City
holidays.
RECOMMENDATION
As our primary temporary engineer, Mr. Sanders is currently in
his ninth month of employment. During that time he has done an
excellent job and has become an important member of our engineering
team. The attached memo from Public Works Director Danielson
outlines his recommendation for a salary adjustment for Mr.
Sanders, and I am in agreement with his recommendation.
ACTION REQUIRED
Council should review the recommendation outlined by Mr.
Danielson and, if in agreement, authorize a wage rate adjustment to
$11.00 per hour for Mr. Shawn Sanders effective January 1, 1991.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 20, 1990
TO: City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works it o
SUBJECT: Shawn Sanders, 1991 Salary Adjust t
BACKGROUND:
Shawn Sanders has now been with the City for nine months.
Shawn is a graduate Civil Engineer who is filling our full-time,
temporary engineer position. Although we designate the position
as temporary, we have always had someone in it. We have never
paid full benefits to anyone occupying the position.
DISCUSSION:
Shawn has done an excellent job during his first nine months
and I highly recommend that the City reward him by adjusting his
1991 compensation from $10.00 to $11.00 per hour (a 4% cost of
living raise,plus 6% - to approximate the normal 6 month step
increase that other new City employees receive). The $11.00 per
hour salary is still below what other employers are paying for
recent graduate civil engineers. Shawn is the key ingredient in
the Engineering Department's ability to complete the Furlong
Addition project in a timely fashion.
JED:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 20, 1990
TO: City Administrator
FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works it o
SUBJECT: Shawn Sanders, 1991 Salary Adjust t
BACKGROUND:
Shawn Sanders has now been with the City for nine months.
Shawn is a graduate Civil Engineer who is filling our full-time,
temporary engineer position. Although we designate the position
as temporary, we have always had someone in it. We have never
paid full benefits to anyone occupying the position.
DISCUSSION:
Shawn has done an excellent job during his first nine months
and I highly recommend that the City reward him by adjusting his
1991 compensation from $10.00 to $11.00 per hour (a 4% cost of
living raise,plus 6% - to approximate the normal 6 month step
increase that other new City employees receive). The $11.00 per
hour salary is still below what other employers are paying for
recent graduate civil engineers. Shawn is the key ingredient in
the Engineering Department's ability to complete the Furlong
Addition project in a timely fashion.
JED:dfw
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMORANDUM
28 December, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
City Admini
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Sale of Surplus Property
INTRODUCTION
The Police Department is requesting permission to sell seven revolvers
that are surplus City property.
RISTORY
We recently went through a transition from City -owned and issued
revolvers, to Department specified, Officer -owned semi-automatic
sidearms. This has resulted in a surplus of 9, City -owned Smith and
Wesson model 66, .357 magnum revolvers.
DISCUSSION
We would like to retain two of the Model 66's to use as "back-up"
weapons in the event that an Officer's gun is down for repairs, and as
initial issue weapons in the event of new appointments to the
Department. The other seven have no value to us and we would rather
sell them than store them.
We would sell the property in accordance with City Ordinances, but I
would prefer to offer the guns for sale to Federally Licensed Firearms
Dealers only. This eliminates our liability for a defective weapon, or
a weapon being put into the hands of a criminal, or future criminal, by
the Police Department. I anticipate that these guns will sell for
approximately $75 - $100 each.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council authorize the sale of 7 surplus pistols to Federally
Licensed Firearms Dealers. The weapons will be sold on an "as -is" basis
and by sealed bids.
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMORANDUM
28 December, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
City Admini
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Sale of Surplus Property
INTRODUCTION
The Police Department is requesting permission to sell seven revolvers
that are surplus City property.
RISTORY
We recently went through a transition from City -owned and issued
revolvers, to Department specified, Officer -owned semi-automatic
sidearms. This has resulted in a surplus of 9, City -owned Smith and
Wesson model 66, .357 magnum revolvers.
DISCUSSION
We would like to retain two of the Model 66's to use as "back-up"
weapons in the event that an Officer's gun is down for repairs, and as
initial issue weapons in the event of new appointments to the
Department. The other seven have no value to us and we would rather
sell them than store them.
We would sell the property in accordance with City Ordinances, but I
would prefer to offer the guns for sale to Federally Licensed Firearms
Dealers only. This eliminates our liability for a defective weapon, or
a weapon being put into the hands of a criminal, or future criminal, by
the Police Department. I anticipate that these guns will sell for
approximately $75 - $100 each.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council authorize the sale of 7 surplus pistols to Federally
Licensed Firearms Dealers. The weapons will be sold on an "as -is" basis
and by sealed bids.
� Mendota Heights
Police Department
-Do No
Apt co- 90_19-1
January 3, 1991
Dear Licensed Firearms Dealer:
You are invited to bid on the following seven (7) handguns being sold by the
City of Mendota Heights.
3 - Smith & Wesson Model 66, 4" barrel, stainless steel, .357 magnum
revolvers with Pachmayar rubber grips.
3 - Smith & Wesson Model 66, 4" barrel, stainless steel, .357 magnum
revolvers with the original wooden grips.
1 - Smith & Wesson Model 66-2, 4" barrel, stainless steel, .357 magnum
revolver with original wooden grips.
These weapons are believed to be in excellent condition. They have become
surplus as a result of the Department's transition to automatic sidearms. The
sale will be conducted pursuant to the following terms:
1. Bids will be accepted only by Federally licensed firearms dealers.
The sale is not open to individuals.
2. Weapons are sold "as is", and the City of Mendota Heights accepts no
responsibility, nor provides any warranty for the condition, or
subsequent use of the firearm.
3. Guns will be sold on a "lot" basis. Bids on individual weapons will not
be considered. Your bid will be for all seven (7) described firearms.
4. All bids must be received on the enclosed bid form.
5. Bids must be received by the Mendota Heights City Clerk, 1101 Victoria
Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118, no later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday,
January 18, 1991.
6. The successful bidder will be notified and must pay for the property
with a Cashier's check, money order, or cash when that property is
redeemed. The property must be redeemed within five (5) working days of
the bid closing.
1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1366
� Mendota Heights
Police Department
-Do No
Apt co- 90_19-1
January 3, 1991
Dear Licensed Firearms Dealer:
You are invited to bid on the following seven (7) handguns being sold by the
City of Mendota Heights.
3 - Smith & Wesson Model 66, 4" barrel, stainless steel, .357 magnum
revolvers with Pachmayar rubber grips.
3 - Smith & Wesson Model 66, 4" barrel, stainless steel, .357 magnum
revolvers with the original wooden grips.
1 - Smith & Wesson Model 66-2, 4" barrel, stainless steel, .357 magnum
revolver with original wooden grips.
These weapons are believed to be in excellent condition. They have become
surplus as a result of the Department's transition to automatic sidearms. The
sale will be conducted pursuant to the following terms:
1. Bids will be accepted only by Federally licensed firearms dealers.
The sale is not open to individuals.
2. Weapons are sold "as is", and the City of Mendota Heights accepts no
responsibility, nor provides any warranty for the condition, or
subsequent use of the firearm.
3. Guns will be sold on a "lot" basis. Bids on individual weapons will not
be considered. Your bid will be for all seven (7) described firearms.
4. All bids must be received on the enclosed bid form.
5. Bids must be received by the Mendota Heights City Clerk, 1101 Victoria
Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118, no later than 4:30 p.m. on Friday,
January 18, 1991.
6. The successful bidder will be notified and must pay for the property
with a Cashier's check, money order, or cash when that property is
redeemed. The property must be redeemed within five (5) working days of
the bid closing.
1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1366
7. Inspection of the weapons is available on an individual basis by
appointment with the Mendota Heights Police Department - PH: 452-1366.
8. The City of Mendota Heights reserves the right to refuse any and all
bids. And any sale will be considered final.
Additional information, if needed, is available by contacting D. Delmont,
Chief of Police at 452-1366.
Yours truly,
Dennis J. Delmont
Chief of Police
DJD:cb
Enclosure
7. Inspection of the weapons is available on an individual basis by
appointment with the Mendota Heights Police Department - PH: 452-1366.
8. The City of Mendota Heights reserves the right to refuse any and all
bids. And any sale will be considered final.
Additional information, if needed, is available by contacting D. Delmont,
Chief of Police at 452-1366.
Yours truly,
Dennis J. Delmont
Chief of Police
DJD:cb
Enclosure
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMORANDUM
28 December, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
City Adminis
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Purchase of Computer Equipment
INTRODUCTION
The Police Department requests permission to buy computer hardware
necessary for the upgrade of the existing computer system.
JIISTORY
Council approved $8,000 in the 1991 Police Department budget to upgrade
our present 9", Macintosh Plus computer network. The original intent
was to replace two of our six Mac Plus computers with two Mac IIcx
computers. Since that time, Apple has introduced a new model Macintosh,
the Mac LC. It is an upgrade of the IIcx and is available at a much
lower cost. We can now upgrade 3 positions for the same $8,000 that we
needed to upgrade two positions 8 months ago.
DISCUSSION
Secretary Bakka and Clerk Trost are badly in need of new computers to
assist them with the ever-increasing load of paperwork being generated
by the Department. Sgt. Larrie Mack handles all of the statistics for
our patrol activity and squad maintenance, and his present equipment is
woefully under -powered for the task. We would like to purchase systems
for each of these positions, and the new Macintosh products will allow
us to do this for our requested, and approved, $8,000.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council authorize the expenditure of up to $8,000 for the purchase
of computer equipment to upgrade the Police Department's network.
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMORANDUM
28 December, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Council
City Adminis
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Purchase of Computer Equipment
INTRODUCTION
The Police Department requests permission to buy computer hardware
necessary for the upgrade of the existing computer system.
JIISTORY
Council approved $8,000 in the 1991 Police Department budget to upgrade
our present 9", Macintosh Plus computer network. The original intent
was to replace two of our six Mac Plus computers with two Mac IIcx
computers. Since that time, Apple has introduced a new model Macintosh,
the Mac LC. It is an upgrade of the IIcx and is available at a much
lower cost. We can now upgrade 3 positions for the same $8,000 that we
needed to upgrade two positions 8 months ago.
DISCUSSION
Secretary Bakka and Clerk Trost are badly in need of new computers to
assist them with the ever-increasing load of paperwork being generated
by the Department. Sgt. Larrie Mack handles all of the statistics for
our patrol activity and squad maintenance, and his present equipment is
woefully under -powered for the task. We would like to purchase systems
for each of these positions, and the new Macintosh products will allow
us to do this for our requested, and approved, $8,000.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council authorize the expenditure of up to $8,000 for the purchase
of computer equipment to upgrade the Police Department's network.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
-X December 28, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Daniel
Public Works Direc
SUBJECT: Mn/DOT Co-op Agment - Lilydale/Sylvandale Road Storm
Sewer Construction
Job No. 9008
Improvement No. 90, Project No. 2
DISCUSSION:
Last summer Mn/DOT was made aware of a failed storm sewer
line that carries Mendota Heights' storm water under Trunk High-
way 13 and empties down the bluff to the Mississippi River. The
existing pipe system was so old that there was no evidence of
when or how it was constructed. Because this pipe is a State
owned facility that crosses from Mendota Heights under State
Trunk Highway 13 to a different City (Lilydale), Mn/DOT is the
agency responsible for its reconstruction. Under Mn/DOT's rules,
there is a formula.for calculating how the project is funded.
Mn/DOT originally calculated the total project cost is approxi-
mately $75,000, with Mendota Heights' share of the construction
to be in excess of $60,000. Staff negotiated that amount down to
the current estimated amount of $28,642. Mn/DOT will pay the
rest of the costs to include Lilydale's share because of their
small population. As a condition of the reduction, Mn/DOT asked
that the City not charge them for any of the costs related to a
potential Ivy Falls Creek project located down stream from this
project. Staff feels that any Mn/DOT participation in that
project would be minimal and that this request is reasonable.
Mn/DOT has informed us that they have notified the Mendota
Heights residents that are to be affected by this project. Staff
proposes to send another letter to these same residents after
Council approves the agreement updating them on the progress of
the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Council agreed to participate with Mn/DOT in this project at
their August 21, 1990 City Council meeting, after which time
Mn/DOT officials drafted the attached agreement documenting the
terms of the construction.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION
APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COOPER-
ATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NUMBER 67784, STATE PROJECT NO.
1902-43 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 13=194).
JED:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
-X December 28, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: James E. Daniel
Public Works Direc
SUBJECT: Mn/DOT Co-op Agment - Lilydale/Sylvandale Road Storm
Sewer Construction
Job No. 9008
Improvement No. 90, Project No. 2
DISCUSSION:
Last summer Mn/DOT was made aware of a failed storm sewer
line that carries Mendota Heights' storm water under Trunk High-
way 13 and empties down the bluff to the Mississippi River. The
existing pipe system was so old that there was no evidence of
when or how it was constructed. Because this pipe is a State
owned facility that crosses from Mendota Heights under State
Trunk Highway 13 to a different City (Lilydale), Mn/DOT is the
agency responsible for its reconstruction. Under Mn/DOT's rules,
there is a formula.for calculating how the project is funded.
Mn/DOT originally calculated the total project cost is approxi-
mately $75,000, with Mendota Heights' share of the construction
to be in excess of $60,000. Staff negotiated that amount down to
the current estimated amount of $28,642. Mn/DOT will pay the
rest of the costs to include Lilydale's share because of their
small population. As a condition of the reduction, Mn/DOT asked
that the City not charge them for any of the costs related to a
potential Ivy Falls Creek project located down stream from this
project. Staff feels that any Mn/DOT participation in that
project would be minimal and that this request is reasonable.
Mn/DOT has informed us that they have notified the Mendota
Heights residents that are to be affected by this project. Staff
proposes to send another letter to these same residents after
Council approves the agreement updating them on the progress of
the project.
RECOMMENDATION:
Council agreed to participate with Mn/DOT in this project at
their August 21, 1990 City Council meeting, after which time
Mn/DOT officials drafted the attached agreement documenting the
terms of the construction.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they
should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 90- , RESOLUTION
APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COOPER-
ATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NUMBER 67784, STATE PROJECT NO.
1902-43 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 13=194).
JED:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NUMBER 67784,
STATE PROJECT NO. 1902-43 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 13=194)
WHEREAS the City of Mendota Heights agrees to participate with
the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation in the
reconstruction of the storm sewer facilities along Trunk Highway 13
adjacent to Sylvandale Road, subject to the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation agreeing to participate with the City
in the Mendota Interchange storm sewer improvements to control the
level of Lake LeMay.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights
enter into Agreement No. 67784 with the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit:
To provide for payment by the City to the State of the
City's share of the cost of the storm sewer facilities
construction and other associated construction to be
performed upon, along and adjacent to Sylvandale Road from
the Trunk Highway No. 13 southeasterly right-of-way line
(approximately Engineer Station 20+16) to inplace Manhole
No. 3 located approximately 250 feet southeasterly of the
Sylvandale Road -Butler Road intersection within the
corporate City limits under State Project No. 1902-43 (Trunk
Highway 13=194).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City Officers are
hereby authorized and directed to execute such agreement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd
day of January, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 91 -
RESOLUTION APPROVING STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NUMBER 67784,
STATE PROJECT NO. 1902-43 (TRUNK HIGHWAY 13=194)
WHEREAS the City of Mendota Heights agrees to participate with
the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation in the
reconstruction of the storm sewer facilities along Trunk Highway 13
adjacent to Sylvandale Road, subject to the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation agreeing to participate with the City
in the Mendota Interchange storm sewer improvements to control the
level of Lake LeMay.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights
enter into Agreement No. 67784 with the State of Minnesota,
Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit:
To provide for payment by the City to the State of the
City's share of the cost of the storm sewer facilities
construction and other associated construction to be
performed upon, along and adjacent to Sylvandale Road from
the Trunk Highway No. 13 southeasterly right-of-way line
(approximately Engineer Station 20+16) to inplace Manhole
No. 3 located approximately 250 feet southeasterly of the
Sylvandale Road -Butler Road intersection within the
corporate City limits under State Project No. 1902-43 (Trunk
Highway 13=194).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City Officers are
hereby authorized and directed to execute such agreement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 2nd
day of January, 1991.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Charles E. Mertensotto
Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
40me4 , Minnesota Department of Transportation
1 pt
Metropolitan District
cfSr Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
OP Ts144 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
Reply to
December 18, 1990 Telephone No 296-3005
Mr. James Danielson
'Public Works Director
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Danielson:
SUBJECT: Proposed Coop. Const. Agree. No. 67784
City of Mendota Heights
S.P. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=I94)
State Funds
City cost storm sewer construction
by the State along and adjacent to
Sylvandale Road from T.H. 13 to an
inplace manhole near Butler Road.
Transmitted herewith in triplicate is a proposed agreement with the
City of Mendota Heights. This agreement provides for payment by the
City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the storm
sewer construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to
Sylvandale Road within the corporate City limits.
Kindly present this agreement to' the City Council for their
approval and execution which includes original signatures of the
City Council authorized City officers on all three copies of the
agreement. Also required are three copies of a new resolution
passed by the City Council authorizing its officers to sign the
agreement on its behalf. A suggested form of such resolution is
also enclosed.
It is requested that the executed agreement and resolution copies
be forwarded to this office as soon as possible. A copy will be
returned to the City when fully executed.
ncerely,
tal
i am r-wford
.'j
istrict Engineer
An Equal Opportunity Employer
40me4 , Minnesota Department of Transportation
1 pt
Metropolitan District
cfSr Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
OP Ts144 Oakdale Office, 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Oakdale, Minnesota 55128
Golden Valley Office, 2055 North Lilac Drive, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422
Reply to
December 18, 1990 Telephone No 296-3005
Mr. James Danielson
'Public Works Director
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Mr. Danielson:
SUBJECT: Proposed Coop. Const. Agree. No. 67784
City of Mendota Heights
S.P. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=I94)
State Funds
City cost storm sewer construction
by the State along and adjacent to
Sylvandale Road from T.H. 13 to an
inplace manhole near Butler Road.
Transmitted herewith in triplicate is a proposed agreement with the
City of Mendota Heights. This agreement provides for payment by the
City to the State of the City's share of the costs of the storm
sewer construction to be performed upon, along and adjacent to
Sylvandale Road within the corporate City limits.
Kindly present this agreement to' the City Council for their
approval and execution which includes original signatures of the
City Council authorized City officers on all three copies of the
agreement. Also required are three copies of a new resolution
passed by the City Council authorizing its officers to sign the
agreement on its behalf. A suggested form of such resolution is
also enclosed.
It is requested that the executed agreement and resolution copies
be forwarded to this office as soon as possible. A copy will be
returned to the City when fully executed.
ncerely,
tal
i am r-wford
.'j
istrict Engineer
An Equal Opportunity Employer
PRE -LETTING STATE OF MINNESOTA
SERVICES ' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECTION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT NO.
67784
S.P. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=194)
State Funds
Agreement between AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
The State of Minnesota
Department of Transportation, and (None)
The City of Mendota Heights
Re: City cost storm sewer construction ESTIMATED AMOUNT
by the State along and adjacent to RECEIVABLE
Sylvandale Road from T.H. 13 to an
inplace manhole near Butler Road $28,642.40
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as
the "State" and the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, acting by and
through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City".
PRE -LETTING STATE OF MINNESOTA
SERVICES ' DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SECTION COOPERATIVE CONSTRUCTION
AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT NO.
67784
S.P. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=194)
State Funds
Agreement between AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
The State of Minnesota
Department of Transportation, and (None)
The City of Mendota Heights
Re: City cost storm sewer construction ESTIMATED AMOUNT
by the State along and adjacent to RECEIVABLE
Sylvandale Road from T.H. 13 to an
inplace manhole near Butler Road $28,642.40
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the State of
Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as
the "State" and the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, acting by and
through its City Council, hereinafter referred to as the "City".
67784
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the State is about to perform detention pond and storm sewer
facilities construction and other associated construction along Trunk
Highway No. 13 from Engineer Station 158+00 (approximately 100 feet
southwesterly of Sylvandale Road) to Engineer Station 164+34
(Brompton Place), and upon, along and adjacent to Sylvandale Road
from the Trunk Highway No. 13 southeasterly right-of-way line
(approximately Engineer Station 20+16) to inplace Manhole No. 3
located approximately 250 feet southeasterly of the Sylvandale Road -
Butler Road intersection within the corporate City limits in
accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special provisions
designated as State Project No. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=194); and
WHEREAS the storm sewer facilities will collect and convey storm
water drainage from both trunk highway right-of-way and adjacent City
property; and
WHEREAS the City has expressed its willingness to reimburse the State
100 percent of the costs of the storm sewer facilities construction
to be performed along and adjacent to Sylvandale Road from Trunk
Highway No. 13 to inplace Manhole No. 3 thereby effectively reducing
the City's cost share to approximately half of what it would have
been had the City's cost share been based on contributing flows for
the entire ponding and storm sewer system; and
2
67784
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS the State is about to perform detention pond and storm sewer
facilities construction and other associated construction along Trunk
Highway No. 13 from Engineer Station 158+00 (approximately 100 feet
southwesterly of Sylvandale Road) to Engineer Station 164+34
(Brompton Place), and upon, along and adjacent to Sylvandale Road
from the Trunk Highway No. 13 southeasterly right-of-way line
(approximately Engineer Station 20+16) to inplace Manhole No. 3
located approximately 250 feet southeasterly of the Sylvandale Road -
Butler Road intersection within the corporate City limits in
accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special provisions
designated as State Project No. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=194); and
WHEREAS the storm sewer facilities will collect and convey storm
water drainage from both trunk highway right-of-way and adjacent City
property; and
WHEREAS the City has expressed its willingness to reimburse the State
100 percent of the costs of the storm sewer facilities construction
to be performed along and adjacent to Sylvandale Road from Trunk
Highway No. 13 to inplace Manhole No. 3 thereby effectively reducing
the City's cost share to approximately half of what it would have
been had the City's cost share been based on contributing flows for
the entire ponding and storm sewer system; and
2
67784
WHEREAS due to that reduction of the City's cost share, all future
storm sewer facilities construction that is. within Ivy Hills Park or
is associated with Ivy Hills Park Pond or is associated with Ivy
Falls Creek which is downstream from Ivy Hills Park Pond shall be
performed without cost or expense to the State; and
WHEREAS Minnesota Statute section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes
the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and
cooperate with any governmental authority for the purpose of
constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system.
IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE I - CONSTRUCTION BY THE STATE
Section A. Contract Award
The State shall advertise for bids and award a construction contract
to the lowest responsible bidder for State Project No. 1902-43 (T.H.
13=194) in accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special
provisions which are on file in the office of the Commissioner of
Transportation at St. Paul, Minnesota, and are made a part hereof by
reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth
herein.
3
67784
WHEREAS due to that reduction of the City's cost share, all future
storm sewer facilities construction that is. within Ivy Hills Park or
is associated with Ivy Hills Park Pond or is associated with Ivy
Falls Creek which is downstream from Ivy Hills Park Pond shall be
performed without cost or expense to the State; and
WHEREAS Minnesota Statute section 161.20, subdivision 2 authorizes
the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and
cooperate with any governmental authority for the purpose of
constructing, maintaining and improving the trunk highway system.
IT IS, THEREFORE, MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
ARTICLE I - CONSTRUCTION BY THE STATE
Section A. Contract Award
The State shall advertise for bids and award a construction contract
to the lowest responsible bidder for State Project No. 1902-43 (T.H.
13=194) in accordance with State plans, specifications and/or special
provisions which are on file in the office of the Commissioner of
Transportation at St. Paul, Minnesota, and are made a part hereof by
reference with the same force and effect as though fully set forth
herein.
3
67784
Section B. Direction and Supervision of Construction
The State shall direct and supervise all construction activities
performed under the construction contract, and perform all
construction engineering and inspection functions in connection with
the contract construction. All of the contract construction shall be
performed in compliance with the approved plans, specifications
and/or special provisions.
Section C. Plan Chancres, Additional Construction, Etc.
The State shall make changes in the plans and/or contract
construction, which may include the City cost participation
construction covered under this agreement, and shall enter into any
necessary addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements with
the State's contractor which are necessary to cause the contract
construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner.
However, the State's District Engineer at St. Paul or his authorized
representative will inform the appropriate City official of any
proposed addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements to the
construction contract which will affect the City cost participation
construction covered under this agreement.
Section D. Satisfactory Completion of Contract
The State shall perform all other acts and functions necessary to
cause the construction contract to be completed in a satisfactory
manner.
4
67784
Section B. Direction and Supervision of Construction
The State shall direct and supervise all construction activities
performed under the construction contract, and perform all
construction engineering and inspection functions in connection with
the contract construction. All of the contract construction shall be
performed in compliance with the approved plans, specifications
and/or special provisions.
Section C. Plan Chancres, Additional Construction, Etc.
The State shall make changes in the plans and/or contract
construction, which may include the City cost participation
construction covered under this agreement, and shall enter into any
necessary addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements with
the State's contractor which are necessary to cause the contract
construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner.
However, the State's District Engineer at St. Paul or his authorized
representative will inform the appropriate City official of any
proposed addenda, change orders and/or supplemental agreements to the
construction contract which will affect the City cost participation
construction covered under this agreement.
Section D. Satisfactory Completion of Contract
The State shall perform all other acts and functions necessary to
cause the construction contract to be completed in a satisfactory
manner.
4
67784
ARTICLE II - INSPECTION BY THE CITY
The City cost participation construction covered under this agreement
and the holding pond constructed under the construction contract
shall be open to inspection by the City. If the City believes the
City cost participation construction covered under this agreement has
not been properly performed or that the construction is defective, or
the holding pond is not being properly maintained by the State, the
City shall inform the State's District Engineer in writing of those
defects or deficiencies. Any recommendations made by the City are
not binding on the State. The State shall have the exclusive right
to determine whether the City cost participation construction covered
under this agreement has been satisfactorily performed by the State's
contractor or whether the holding pond constructed under the
construction contract is being properly maintained by the State.
ARTICLE III - BASIS OF PAYMENT BY THE CITY
Section A. SCHEDULE "I"
A Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" is attached hereto and made a part hereof
by reference. The Preliminary SCHEDULE
11111
includes all anticipated
City cost participation construction items and the construction
engineering cost share covered under this agreement, and is based on
engineer's estimated unit prices.
5
67784
ARTICLE II - INSPECTION BY THE CITY
The City cost participation construction covered under this agreement
and the holding pond constructed under the construction contract
shall be open to inspection by the City. If the City believes the
City cost participation construction covered under this agreement has
not been properly performed or that the construction is defective, or
the holding pond is not being properly maintained by the State, the
City shall inform the State's District Engineer in writing of those
defects or deficiencies. Any recommendations made by the City are
not binding on the State. The State shall have the exclusive right
to determine whether the City cost participation construction covered
under this agreement has been satisfactorily performed by the State's
contractor or whether the holding pond constructed under the
construction contract is being properly maintained by the State.
ARTICLE III - BASIS OF PAYMENT BY THE CITY
Section A. SCHEDULE "I"
A Preliminary SCHEDULE "I" is attached hereto and made a part hereof
by reference. The Preliminary SCHEDULE
11111
includes all anticipated
City cost participation construction items and the construction
engineering cost share covered under this agreement, and is based on
engineer's estimated unit prices.
5
67784
Section B. City Cost Participation Construction
100 Percent: All of the storm sewer facilities construction and
other associated construction to be performed upon, along and
adjacent to Sylvandale Road from the Trunk Highway No. -13
southeasterly right-of-way line (approximately Engineer Station
20+16) to inplace Manhole No. 3 located approximately 250 feet
southeasterly of the Sylvandale Road -Butler Road intersection within
the corporate City limits under State Project No. 1902-43 (T.H.
13=194). The construction includes, but is not limited to, sawing
bituminous pavement, excavation, bituminous surfacing and its
aggregate base, pipe sewer, sprinkler system adjustment, manholes,
casting assemblies, guide posts, fencing, turf establishment and the
City's proportionate share of mobilization, maintenance and
restoration of haul roads and traffic control.
Section C. Construction Engineering Costs
The City shall pay a construction engineering charge in an amount
equal to 8 percent of the total cost of the City participation
construction covered under this agreement.
Section D. Addenda, Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements
The City shall share in the costs of construction contract addenda,
change orders and/or supplemental agreements which are necessary to
complete the City cost participation construction covered under this
agreement.
6
67784
Section B. City Cost Participation Construction
100 Percent: All of the storm sewer facilities construction and
other associated construction to be performed upon, along and
adjacent to Sylvandale Road from the Trunk Highway No. -13
southeasterly right-of-way line (approximately Engineer Station
20+16) to inplace Manhole No. 3 located approximately 250 feet
southeasterly of the Sylvandale Road -Butler Road intersection within
the corporate City limits under State Project No. 1902-43 (T.H.
13=194). The construction includes, but is not limited to, sawing
bituminous pavement, excavation, bituminous surfacing and its
aggregate base, pipe sewer, sprinkler system adjustment, manholes,
casting assemblies, guide posts, fencing, turf establishment and the
City's proportionate share of mobilization, maintenance and
restoration of haul roads and traffic control.
Section C. Construction Engineering Costs
The City shall pay a construction engineering charge in an amount
equal to 8 percent of the total cost of the City participation
construction covered under this agreement.
Section D. Addenda, Change Orders and Supplemental Agreements
The City shall share in the costs of construction contract addenda,
change orders and/or supplemental agreements which are necessary to
complete the City cost participation construction covered under this
agreement.
6
67784
Section E. Settlements of Claims
The City shall pay to the State its share of the cost of any
settlements of claims made with the State's contractor.
All liquidated damages assessed the State's contractor in connection
with the construction contract shall result in a credit shared by the
State and the City in the same proportion as their total construction
cost share covered under this agreement is to the total contract
construction cost before any deduction for liquidated damages.
ARTICLE IV - PAYMENT BY THE CITY
Section A. Estimate and Advancement of the City's Cost Share
It is estimated that the City's share of the costs of the contract
construction plus the construction engineering cost share is the sum
of $28,642.40 as shown in the attached Preliminary SCHEDULE "I".
Upon award of the construction contract the State shall prepare a
Revised SCHEDULE "I" based on construction contract unit prices and
shall submit a copy to the City. The City shall advance to the
Commissioner of Transportation the City's total estimated cost share
as shown in the Revised SCHEDULE "I", be it more or less than the sum
of $28,642.40.
The advancement by the City shall be made in accordance with the
following advancement schedule only after the following conditions
7
67784
Section E. Settlements of Claims
The City shall pay to the State its share of the cost of any
settlements of claims made with the State's contractor.
All liquidated damages assessed the State's contractor in connection
with the construction contract shall result in a credit shared by the
State and the City in the same proportion as their total construction
cost share covered under this agreement is to the total contract
construction cost before any deduction for liquidated damages.
ARTICLE IV - PAYMENT BY THE CITY
Section A. Estimate and Advancement of the City's Cost Share
It is estimated that the City's share of the costs of the contract
construction plus the construction engineering cost share is the sum
of $28,642.40 as shown in the attached Preliminary SCHEDULE "I".
Upon award of the construction contract the State shall prepare a
Revised SCHEDULE "I" based on construction contract unit prices and
shall submit a copy to the City. The City shall advance to the
Commissioner of Transportation the City's total estimated cost share
as shown in the Revised SCHEDULE "I", be it more or less than the sum
of $28,642.40.
The advancement by the City shall be made in accordance with the
following advancement schedule only after the following conditions
7
67784
have been met:
1. Full and complete execution of this agreement.
2. Award of a contract for the construction to be performed
hereunder.
3. Receipt by the City of appropriate requests from the State for
payment by the City in accordance with the following advancement
schedule.
CITY COST SHARE ADVANCEMENT SCHEDULE
First payment: Within 30 calendar days of the date of the request
from the State for payment by the City, an amount equal to 50 percent
of the City's total cost share as set forth in the Revised SCHEDULE
Second payment: On or before February 1, 1992, an amount equal to
the City's total cost share as set forth in the Revised SCHEDULE
less the amount of all previous payments made by the City.
"In
Section B. Final Payment by the City
Upon completion and acceptance of the contract construction and upon
computation of the final amount due the State's contractor, the State
shall prepare a Final SCHEDULE "I" based on final quantities of City
8
67784
have been met:
1. Full and complete execution of this agreement.
2. Award of a contract for the construction to be performed
hereunder.
3. Receipt by the City of appropriate requests from the State for
payment by the City in accordance with the following advancement
schedule.
CITY COST SHARE ADVANCEMENT SCHEDULE
First payment: Within 30 calendar days of the date of the request
from the State for payment by the City, an amount equal to 50 percent
of the City's total cost share as set forth in the Revised SCHEDULE
Second payment: On or before February 1, 1992, an amount equal to
the City's total cost share as set forth in the Revised SCHEDULE
less the amount of all previous payments made by the City.
"In
Section B. Final Payment by the City
Upon completion and acceptance of the contract construction and upon
computation of the final amount due the State's contractor, the State
shall prepare a Final SCHEDULE "I" based on final quantities of City
8
67784
cost participation construction performed, and shall submit a copy to
the City. If the final cost of the City participation construction
covered under this agreement exceeds the amount of funds advanced by
the City, the City shall, upon receipt of a request from the State,
promptly pay the difference to the State without interest. If the
final cost of the City participation construction covered under this
agreement is less than the amount of funds advanced by the City, the
State shall promptly return the balance to the City without interest.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statute section 15.415, the State waives claim
for any amounts less than $2.00 over the amount of City funds
previously advanced to the State, and the City waives claim for the
return of any amounts less than $2.00 of those funds advanced by the
City.
Section C. Acceptance of City's Cost and Completed Construction
The computation by the State of the amount due from the City shall be
final, binding and conclusive. Acceptance by the State of the
completed contract construction shall be final, binding and
conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of the
contract construction.
ARTICLE V - FUTURE IVY FALLS CREEK IMPROVEMENTS
The City cost share as described in Article III of this agreement is
approximately half of what it would have been had the City's cost
9
67784
cost participation construction performed, and shall submit a copy to
the City. If the final cost of the City participation construction
covered under this agreement exceeds the amount of funds advanced by
the City, the City shall, upon receipt of a request from the State,
promptly pay the difference to the State without interest. If the
final cost of the City participation construction covered under this
agreement is less than the amount of funds advanced by the City, the
State shall promptly return the balance to the City without interest.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statute section 15.415, the State waives claim
for any amounts less than $2.00 over the amount of City funds
previously advanced to the State, and the City waives claim for the
return of any amounts less than $2.00 of those funds advanced by the
City.
Section C. Acceptance of City's Cost and Completed Construction
The computation by the State of the amount due from the City shall be
final, binding and conclusive. Acceptance by the State of the
completed contract construction shall be final, binding and
conclusive upon the City as to the satisfactory completion of the
contract construction.
ARTICLE V - FUTURE IVY FALLS CREEK IMPROVEMENTS
The City cost share as described in Article III of this agreement is
approximately half of what it would have been had the City's cost
9
67784
share been based on contributing flows for the entire ponding and
storm sewer system. Due to that reduction of the City's cost share,
all future storm sewer facilities construction that is within Ivy
Hilts Park or is associated with Ivy Hills Park Pond or is associated
with Ivy Falls Creek which is downstream from Ivy Hills Park Pond
shall be performed without cost or expense to the State.
ARTICLE VI - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section A. Plan Changes
The City may request changes in the plans. If the State determines
that the requested plan changes are necessary and/or desirable, the
State will cause those plan changes to be made.
Section B. Replacement of Castings
The City shall furnish the State's contractor with new castings
and/or parts for all inplace City -owned facilities constructed
hereunder when replacements are required, without cost or expense to
the State or the State's contractor, except for replacement of
castings and/or parts broken or damaged by the State's contractor.
Section C. Maintenance by the City
Upon satisfactory completion of the Sylvandale Road construction to
be performed within the corporate City limits under the construction
contract, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of the
roadway and all of the facilities a part thereof, without cost or
10
67784
share been based on contributing flows for the entire ponding and
storm sewer system. Due to that reduction of the City's cost share,
all future storm sewer facilities construction that is within Ivy
Hilts Park or is associated with Ivy Hills Park Pond or is associated
with Ivy Falls Creek which is downstream from Ivy Hills Park Pond
shall be performed without cost or expense to the State.
ARTICLE VI - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section A. Plan Changes
The City may request changes in the plans. If the State determines
that the requested plan changes are necessary and/or desirable, the
State will cause those plan changes to be made.
Section B. Replacement of Castings
The City shall furnish the State's contractor with new castings
and/or parts for all inplace City -owned facilities constructed
hereunder when replacements are required, without cost or expense to
the State or the State's contractor, except for replacement of
castings and/or parts broken or damaged by the State's contractor.
Section C. Maintenance by the City
Upon satisfactory completion of the Sylvandale Road construction to
be performed within the corporate City limits under the construction
contract, the City shall provide for the proper maintenance of the
roadway and all of the facilities a part thereof, without cost or
10
67784
expense to the State. Maintenance shall include, but not be limited
to, snow and debris removal, resurfacing and/or seal coating and any
other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the roadway in a
safe and usable condition.
Upon satisfactory completion of the storm sewer facilities
construction to be performed upon and along Sylvandale Road and
downstream therefrom to inplace Manhole No. 3 within the corporate
City limits under the construction contract, the City shall own and
shall provide for the proper maintenance of those facilities, without
cost or expense to the State.
Section D. Maintenance by the State
Upon satisfactory completion of the holding pond construction to be
performed under the construction contract, the State shall provide
for the proper maintenance of the holding pond and all of the
facilities a part thereof, without cost or expense to the City.
Section E. Additional Drainage
Neither party to this agreement shall drain any additional drainage
into the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction
contract that was not included in the drainage for which the storm
sewer facilities were designed without first obtaining permission to
do so from the other party. The drainage areas served by the storm
sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract are
11
Jki:
67784
expense to the State. Maintenance shall include, but not be limited
to, snow and debris removal, resurfacing and/or seal coating and any
other maintenance activities necessary to perpetuate the roadway in a
safe and usable condition.
Upon satisfactory completion of the storm sewer facilities
construction to be performed upon and along Sylvandale Road and
downstream therefrom to inplace Manhole No. 3 within the corporate
City limits under the construction contract, the City shall own and
shall provide for the proper maintenance of those facilities, without
cost or expense to the State.
Section D. Maintenance by the State
Upon satisfactory completion of the holding pond construction to be
performed under the construction contract, the State shall provide
for the proper maintenance of the holding pond and all of the
facilities a part thereof, without cost or expense to the City.
Section E. Additional Drainage
Neither party to this agreement shall drain any additional drainage
into the storm sewer facilities constructed under the construction
contract that was not included in the drainage for which the storm
sewer facilities were designed without first obtaining permission to
do so from the other party. The drainage areas served by the storm
sewer facilities constructed under the construction contract are
11
Jki:
67784
shown in a drainage area map, EXHIBIT "Drainage Area", which is on
file in the office of the State's District Hydraulics Engineer at
Oakdale and is made a part hereof by reference with the same force
and effect as though fully set forth herein.
Section F. Holding Pond Liabilities
The City shall share in all responsibilities, obligations and
liabilities arising out of or by reason of the outletting of drainage
from the holding pond, the use of the holding pond, and the operation
of the holding pond constructed under the construction contract. The
City's share of the responsibilities, obligations and liabilities
shall be 83.3 percent which is the City's share of the holding pond
storm water drainage based on contributing storm water peak inflows.
Section G. Claims
All employees of the State and all other persons employed by the
State`in the performance of contract construction and/or construction
engineering covered under this agreement shall not be considered
employees of the City. All claims that arise under the Worker's
Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees
while so engaged and all claims made by any third parties as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part'of the employees while
so engaged on contract construction and/or construction engineering
covered under this agreement shall in no way be the obligation or
responsibility of the City.
12
67784
shown in a drainage area map, EXHIBIT "Drainage Area", which is on
file in the office of the State's District Hydraulics Engineer at
Oakdale and is made a part hereof by reference with the same force
and effect as though fully set forth herein.
Section F. Holding Pond Liabilities
The City shall share in all responsibilities, obligations and
liabilities arising out of or by reason of the outletting of drainage
from the holding pond, the use of the holding pond, and the operation
of the holding pond constructed under the construction contract. The
City's share of the responsibilities, obligations and liabilities
shall be 83.3 percent which is the City's share of the holding pond
storm water drainage based on contributing storm water peak inflows.
Section G. Claims
All employees of the State and all other persons employed by the
State`in the performance of contract construction and/or construction
engineering covered under this agreement shall not be considered
employees of the City. All claims that arise under the Worker's
Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the employees
while so engaged and all claims made by any third parties as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part'of the employees while
so engaged on contract construction and/or construction engineering
covered under this agreement shall in no way be the obligation or
responsibility of the City.
12
67784
All employees of the City and all other persons employed by the City
in the performance of maintenance covered under this agreement shall
not be considered employees of the State. All claims that arise
under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on
behalf of the employees while so engaged and all claims made by any
third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
the employees while so engaged on maintenance covered under this
agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the
State.
The City at its own sole cost and expense shall defend, indemnify,
save and hold harmless the State and all of its agents, officers and
employees of and from all claims, demands, proceedings, actions or
causes of action of whatsoever nature or character arising out of or
by reason of maintenance covered under this agreement including an
action or claim which alleges negligence of the State, its agents,
officers or employees.
Section H. Nondiscrimination
The provisions of Minnesota Statute section 181.59 and of any
applicable ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination
shall be considered part of this agreement as if fully set forth
herein.
13
67784
All employees of the City and all other persons employed by the City
in the performance of maintenance covered under this agreement shall
not be considered employees of the State. All claims that arise
under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on
behalf of the employees while so engaged and all claims made by any
third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of
the employees while so engaged on maintenance covered under this
agreement shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the
State.
The City at its own sole cost and expense shall defend, indemnify,
save and hold harmless the State and all of its agents, officers and
employees of and from all claims, demands, proceedings, actions or
causes of action of whatsoever nature or character arising out of or
by reason of maintenance covered under this agreement including an
action or claim which alleges negligence of the State, its agents,
officers or employees.
Section H. Nondiscrimination
The provisions of Minnesota Statute section 181.59 and of any
applicable ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination
shall be considered part of this agreement as if fully set forth
herein.
13
67784
Section I. Agreement Approval
Before this agreement shall become binding and effective, it shall be
approved by a City Council resolution and receive approval of State
and City officers as the law may provide in addition to the
Commissioner of Transportation or his authorized representative.
i
14
67784
Section I. Agreement Approval
Before this agreement shall become binding and effective, it shall be
approved by a City Council resolution and receive approval of State
and City officers as the law may provide in addition to the
Commissioner of Transportation or his authorized representative.
i
14
67784
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this agreement by their
authorized officers.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Recommended for approval:
By ��r� l- �. - ��Q ,
Director
Pre -Letting Services Section
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Mayor
Date
By By
District Engineer City Clerk
By Date
Deputy Division Director
Technical Services Division
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Approved:
By
Approved:
Deputy Commissioner By
of Transportation (Authorized Signature)
Date Date
(Date of Agreement)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Approved as to form and execution:
By
Special Assistant Attorney General
15
67784
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this agreement by their
authorized officers.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Recommended for approval:
By ��r� l- �. - ��Q ,
Director
Pre -Letting Services Section
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Mayor
Date
By By
District Engineer City Clerk
By Date
Deputy Division Director
Technical Services Division
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Approved:
By
Approved:
Deputy Commissioner By
of Transportation (Authorized Signature)
Date Date
(Date of Agreement)
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Approved as to form and execution:
By
Special Assistant Attorney General
15
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE "I"
Agreement No. 67784
City of Mendota Heights
Preliminary: November 16, 1990
S.P. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=194)
State Funds
Storm sewer construction performed under
State Contract No. with
located along and adjacent to Svlvandale
Road
from T.H. 13 to an inplace manhole near
Butler
Road
CITY COST PARTICIPATION
From Sheet No. 2
$26,520.74
Construction Engineering (8%)
2,121.66
Total Citv Cost
$28,642.40
1
PRELIMINARY SCHEDULE "I"
Agreement No. 67784
City of Mendota Heights
Preliminary: November 16, 1990
S.P. 1902-43 (T.H. 13=194)
State Funds
Storm sewer construction performed under
State Contract No. with
located along and adjacent to Svlvandale
Road
from T.H. 13 to an inplace manhole near
Butler
Road
CITY COST PARTICIPATION
From Sheet No. 2
$26,520.74
Construction Engineering (8%)
2,121.66
Total Citv Cost
$28,642.40
1
(P) = PLAN QUANTITY
67784
ITEM
NUMBER
S.P. 1902-43
WORK ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
(1)
UNIT PRICE
COST
(1)
2021.501
MOBILIZATION
LUMP SUM
.39
2,692.00
1,049,88
2051.501
MAINT. AND RESTORATION OF HAUL ROADS
LUMP SUM
.39
100.00
39.00
2104.513
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
LIN. FT.
365.00
2.14
781.10
2105.501
COMMON EXCAVATION (P)
CU. YD.
115.00
3.00
345.00
2211.503
AGGREGATE BASE PLACED CLASS 5
CU. YD.
52.00
10.00
520.00
2331.508
TYPE 31 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
49.00
20.00
980.00
2331.510
TYPE 31 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE
TON
61.00
15.00
915.00
2357.502
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GALLON
17.00
. 1.00
17.00
2503.541
15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006
LIN. FT.
494.00
23.63
11,673.22
2503.541
15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III
LIN. FT.
130.00
23.63
3,071.90
0504.603
ADJUST SPRINKLER SYSTEM
LIN. FT.
250.00
.50
125.00
2506.506
CONSTRUCT MANHOLES DESIGN A OR F
LIN. FT.
9.40
150.00
1,410.00
2506.506
CONSTRUCT MANHOLES DESIGN C OR G
LIN. FT.
9.70
150.00
1,455.00
2506.516
CASTING ASSEMBLIES
EACH
3.00
300.00
900.00
2554.509
GUIDE POSTS TYPE B
EACH
2.00
15.00
30.00
2557.529
TEMPORARY FENCE
LIN. FT.
435.00
2.50
1,087.50
0563.601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
.39
672,00
262.08
2575.505
SODDING TYPE LAWN
SO. YD,
1,202.00
1.53
1,839.06
2575.532
COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER ANALYSIS 10-20-20
POUND
125.00
.16
20.00
TOTAL
$26,520.74
(1) 100% CITY - $26,520.74
(P) = PLAN QUANTITY
67784
ITEM
NUMBER
S.P. 1902-43
WORK ITEM
UNIT
QUANTITY
(1)
UNIT PRICE
COST
(1)
2021.501
MOBILIZATION
LUMP SUM
.39
2,692.00
1,049,88
2051.501
MAINT. AND RESTORATION OF HAUL ROADS
LUMP SUM
.39
100.00
39.00
2104.513
SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
LIN. FT.
365.00
2.14
781.10
2105.501
COMMON EXCAVATION (P)
CU. YD.
115.00
3.00
345.00
2211.503
AGGREGATE BASE PLACED CLASS 5
CU. YD.
52.00
10.00
520.00
2331.508
TYPE 31 WEARING COURSE MIXTURE
TON
49.00
20.00
980.00
2331.510
TYPE 31 BINDER COURSE MIXTURE
TON
61.00
15.00
915.00
2357.502
BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT
GALLON
17.00
. 1.00
17.00
2503.541
15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006
LIN. FT.
494.00
23.63
11,673.22
2503.541
15" RC PIPE SEWER DESIGN 3006 CLASS III
LIN. FT.
130.00
23.63
3,071.90
0504.603
ADJUST SPRINKLER SYSTEM
LIN. FT.
250.00
.50
125.00
2506.506
CONSTRUCT MANHOLES DESIGN A OR F
LIN. FT.
9.40
150.00
1,410.00
2506.506
CONSTRUCT MANHOLES DESIGN C OR G
LIN. FT.
9.70
150.00
1,455.00
2506.516
CASTING ASSEMBLIES
EACH
3.00
300.00
900.00
2554.509
GUIDE POSTS TYPE B
EACH
2.00
15.00
30.00
2557.529
TEMPORARY FENCE
LIN. FT.
435.00
2.50
1,087.50
0563.601
TRAFFIC CONTROL
LUMP SUM
.39
672,00
262.08
2575.505
SODDING TYPE LAWN
SO. YD,
1,202.00
1.53
1,839.06
2575.532
COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER ANALYSIS 10-20-20
POUND
125.00
.16
20.00
TOTAL
$26,520.74
(1) 100% CITY - $26,520.74
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
January 3, 1991
Asphalt License
Daily & Son Blacktopping, Inc.
Masonry Licenses
Arcade Concrete Const., Inc.
Boettcher, Mike -Construction
Bricks Unlimited
Compton, Robert -Inc.
Concrete Systems, Inc.
Cook, H.W.-& Sons
Dahn Builders
Kelleher Construction
Klatte, Peter -Brick & Stone
Klund Construction
Schlagel, Peter -Masonry
Stanke Masonry & Const.
Theisen -Fischer, Inc.
Wayne Concrete Co., Inc.
Excavating Licenses
Bollig & Sons, Inc.
Danner Landscaping
Lakeside Plmb. & Htg., Inc.
Le Roux Excavating, Inc.
Mack's Excavating
Rumpca Sewer & Water; Inc.
Scherff, Inc.
State Mechanical, Inc.
Sun Excavating, Inc.
United Water & Sewer Co.
Weierke Trenching & Exc. Co.
General Contractor Licenses
Advance Construction
Automatic Garage Door Co.
Beartown Builders
Befort Roofing, Inc.
Bolander, Carl-& Sons Co.
Brin-Northwestern Glass Co.
Dahlstrom Designer Homes
Dakota Fire Suppression
EFH Company
Falcon Fire Protection, Inc.
Fireside Corner (The)
LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL
January 3, 1991
Asphalt License
Daily & Son Blacktopping, Inc.
Masonry Licenses
Arcade Concrete Const., Inc.
Boettcher, Mike -Construction
Bricks Unlimited
Compton, Robert -Inc.
Concrete Systems, Inc.
Cook, H.W.-& Sons
Dahn Builders
Kelleher Construction
Klatte, Peter -Brick & Stone
Klund Construction
Schlagel, Peter -Masonry
Stanke Masonry & Const.
Theisen -Fischer, Inc.
Wayne Concrete Co., Inc.
Excavating Licenses
Bollig & Sons, Inc.
Danner Landscaping
Lakeside Plmb. & Htg., Inc.
Le Roux Excavating, Inc.
Mack's Excavating
Rumpca Sewer & Water; Inc.
Scherff, Inc.
State Mechanical, Inc.
Sun Excavating, Inc.
United Water & Sewer Co.
Weierke Trenching & Exc. Co.
General Contractor Licenses
Advance Construction
Automatic Garage Door Co.
Beartown Builders
Befort Roofing, Inc.
Bolander, Carl-& Sons Co.
Brin-Northwestern Glass Co.
Dahlstrom Designer Homes
Dakota Fire Suppression
EFH Company
Falcon Fire Protection, Inc.
Fireside Corner (The)
General Contractor Licenses Cont.
Harvey Homes
Independent Fire Protection, Inc.
JA Development, Inc.
K & P Drywall
Knight & Sons Const. Co.
Kraus -Anderson Const. Co.
Lifestyle Homes, Inc.
McPhillips Bros. Roofing Co.
Mendota Heights Landscaping
North American Framing, Inc.
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
Quality Exteriors, Inc.
Rem -Con, Inc.
Ryan Const. Co.
St. Paul Linoleum & Carpet Co.
Sapletal Construction
Snelling Co. (The)
Sorenson's Const. Co. of St. Paul, Inc.
TJB Homes, Ltd.
Twin City Fireplace Co.
Woods Construction
Zwinger, Charles -Inc.
Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses
Air Comfort, Inc.
Allan Mechanical, Inc.
Arneson, Earl Jr.
Benke Heating
Binder, A.-& Son, Inc.
Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc.
Controlled Air, Inc.
DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc.
Egan & Sons Co.
Fredrickson Htg. & A/C, Inc.
Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co.
Harris Mechanical Cont. Co.
Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc.
Riccar Htg. & A/C
Ron's Mechanical, Inc.
Sedgwick Htg. & A/C Co.
Valley Aire, Inc.
Wenzel Htg. & A/C
Gas Piping Licenses
Air Comfort, Inc.
Binder, A.-& Son, Inc.
Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc.
Controlled Air, Inc.
DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc.
Egan & Sons Co.
Five Star Plumbing, Inc.
Fredrickson Htg.•& A/C, Inc.
Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co.
General Contractor Licenses Cont.
Harvey Homes
Independent Fire Protection, Inc.
JA Development, Inc.
K & P Drywall
Knight & Sons Const. Co.
Kraus -Anderson Const. Co.
Lifestyle Homes, Inc.
McPhillips Bros. Roofing Co.
Mendota Heights Landscaping
North American Framing, Inc.
Northwest Asphalt, Inc.
Quality Exteriors, Inc.
Rem -Con, Inc.
Ryan Const. Co.
St. Paul Linoleum & Carpet Co.
Sapletal Construction
Snelling Co. (The)
Sorenson's Const. Co. of St. Paul, Inc.
TJB Homes, Ltd.
Twin City Fireplace Co.
Woods Construction
Zwinger, Charles -Inc.
Heating & Air Conditioning Licenses
Air Comfort, Inc.
Allan Mechanical, Inc.
Arneson, Earl Jr.
Benke Heating
Binder, A.-& Son, Inc.
Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc.
Controlled Air, Inc.
DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc.
Egan & Sons Co.
Fredrickson Htg. & A/C, Inc.
Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co.
Harris Mechanical Cont. Co.
Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc.
Riccar Htg. & A/C
Ron's Mechanical, Inc.
Sedgwick Htg. & A/C Co.
Valley Aire, Inc.
Wenzel Htg. & A/C
Gas Piping Licenses
Air Comfort, Inc.
Binder, A.-& Son, Inc.
Burnsville Htg. & A/C Co., Inc.
Controlled Air, Inc.
DJ's Htg. & A/C, Inc.
Egan & Sons Co.
Five Star Plumbing, Inc.
Fredrickson Htg.•& A/C, Inc.
Genz -Ryan Plmb. & Htg. Co.
Gas Piping Licenses Cont.
Harris Mechanical Cont. Co.
Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc.
Riccar Heating
Sedgwick Htg. & A/C Co.
Valley Aire, Inc.
Wenzel Htg. & A/C
Plaster License
Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc.
Sign Erecting License
Suburban Lighting, Inc.
Cigarette Licenses
D.V.M., Inc.
Employee Party Fund
Fina Serve, Inc.
Par 3 Golf, Inc.
SOS Convenient Mart, Inc.
Snyder's Drug Store #42
Somerset Country Club
Tom Thumb
Rubbish Hauler Licenses
AA Rubbish Service, Inc.
Action Disposal
Krupenny & Sons Disposal Svc.
Triangle Rubbish Service
Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc.
Gas Piping Licenses Cont.
Harris Mechanical Cont. Co.
Metropolitan Mech. Cont., Inc.
Riccar Heating
Sedgwick Htg. & A/C Co.
Valley Aire, Inc.
Wenzel Htg. & A/C
Plaster License
Zimmerman Stucco & Plaster, Inc.
Sign Erecting License
Suburban Lighting, Inc.
Cigarette Licenses
D.V.M., Inc.
Employee Party Fund
Fina Serve, Inc.
Par 3 Golf, Inc.
SOS Convenient Mart, Inc.
Snyder's Drug Store #42
Somerset Country Club
Tom Thumb
Rubbish Hauler Licenses
AA Rubbish Service, Inc.
Action Disposal
Krupenny & Sons Disposal Svc.
Triangle Rubbish Service
Woodlake Sanitary Service, Inc.
4n1
,•-
•
January 3, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY:
Total Claims
Significant Claims
Metro Wast Control
Carlson Sewer
Unusual Claims
71,165
Monthly swr charge 36,049
Impr cost 6,000
Mn Telephone installers New phone.& line 665
W. St. Paul Common swr mtcn 1990
Items coded a/c2010 are 1990 expenses
MANUAL CHECKS
Sewer Avail Charges -
Mendakota Park land ,
•
646
15,180 ,
518,268
4n1
,•-
•
January 3, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY:
Total Claims
Significant Claims
Metro Wast Control
Carlson Sewer
Unusual Claims
71,165
Monthly swr charge 36,049
Impr cost 6,000
Mn Telephone installers New phone.& line 665
W. St. Paul Common swr mtcn 1990
Items coded a/c2010 are 1990 expenses
MANUAL CHECKS
Sewer Avail Charges -
Mendakota Park land ,
•
646
15,180 ,
518,268
iepc .0-ziam
Vept Bridge
08 Dec 2S -r- .L.-sngr . 60-Utilties' \
1/3/91 C1alms Llst 20 -Police - 70 -Parks Pa.ge
FI -1 18:47 City or hem:Iota Heights -o . 30_-. , ,'" ; • , .,..,
rare . .,,..- , 80 -Planning
- •'..t • 1 ' - '" 40 -CEO .-,-. ".-f..„ 7.- r ,..- 85 -Recycling ^;.",..,':::,,':,:‘,:.: •';. '-..7_,.,. .1-,,T:''' , - -• ,; ,
Temp Check Number 1 ,1 ,, , 90 -Animal Control •
Temp.. , - , _
... . .
, , .
CheCk
' , .
. .
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
4
6
Number vendor Name Rccount cafe Comments Amount
,
1 APO!) Seri pi rig 02 -e72)1 0 st J-iping . 487.44
.•
7
8
• -
,
• ,
1 487.44143
Totals Temp Check Number 1 •
. .
9
11
12
10
11
12
Temp Check Number ....
13
14
15
16
131...,--# "rLt-1 017--`431.0-1-10-T0 ld calls .8.68 ,
14 t? Pi T L.S. T 01 --4ai et•-08:0---atz, Id calls , 18.91 -
, . . '
5 1E' A -r IS- T 073 -401V, -1186-2Z 1c1 calls e...7S - • -
17
18
19
20
16 - ----
17 5 ' 30.36
'
18 Totals Temp Check tftember-
21
22
23
24
19 1. ... - "- -, : • , „ •
. . , ,. - „,.. . - ,
'20 Temp Cneck number 3 .
"
21 •• .., , • ,
25
26
29
30
31
32
23 .3 P7 f Li. 1- -----err:74. lel Iff Of 70 Jan svc ..34.48
'23 3 AT&T 1212 -481 0--enzi--,60 Jan 5 vo - 20. ms .
24 3 AT:FT 15-4310-060-60 Jan svc - 30.92, _ •
25 , 4 Ma) 1211,---AS,112-V-12ta0- ',, an sv • 4.40
, ..., .. ,. , ,,,, ..•
' 26 -- . . , . •
, , •.. . " , .
• '„
27 11. ,
. .„ ' ''.' ."-. ' • 99.80
33
35
36
28 Totals Temp Urieck Nualber __
, 29 • , '
.
.
30 Temp check Number . -,. . , .. ',.;',:,,,.0 7,, .? '.,9q.... . • . .-',....-c,,-,..-f• .....„.-..-':';;$.4 ,,
37
38
39
40
31 » »» - _ „.. . „', •
32 4 Pr..vh Auto Salvage Inc , . ', ol -eel el .. .', :- ,... splys -.„..: - 50.00
• ”. . :" - , '1.' - , ,
33 , • . ,. • . . ',. -------
. , ,, , • ,
41
42
43
44
34 4 ote,.. wrier ,
. , • a -
! 35 Totals Temp Check Number 447
36 / - .
»0
45
37 ..0 Temp C•17E.C.2<,Plumer,9: ...
. ,
. . •
38 ' ' . • .. '
. ,
„ , •
39 ,, • 9141221r/son 1165-430:5-299-29 sp3ys .; ti,” ,,'.„ '93. 08 , - • .. -„ .. „ ,: •,. •
49
50
51
52
40
, •
41 • ". - ' - : 93.93
.. . ,.., .
42 idtais Temp Check Humber 9 0 •-
53
54
55
56
„ .. 0
44Temp Check 14umber • - 6 ° , . . ,. . , ,
. , .,
.-. - - -- - '' :2 •'' . .• ' ;- •":.
57
58
60
46 - -mer can ue tress c.rms - swr bilis bila.44 •
47 - . •__0_0_0_•_ - -.
48 6 . ,
670.4 :
3
• , ,.
al
62,
63”
64
49 Totals rewp Criec/C Numser. , . r
, ..A
., '')
50 • • , '' ".•
... 5 ,,, ,
5/ ' Temp. atieck Humber, ,,, 7 »» a: '- a a>, „ , -,:»'"-- ..
' * , .
65
66
68
52 .
53 7 Berke Companles 08-0010 . , --r{:31^S . " '-.. , = '' z , .
a 99.90
- -
'
69
70
72
54 —
_ , ' -
•
, . .
56 Totals Temp Check IVumber?:. ;, 7 • •. , :' , . ' ,.., 4, ‘.• ,.. -
. , ,
, • . , , ..".: " :• A , , , .
. , .,
73
74',
75^
79
Z. 4" 4 • r •
. •
'
0
)
D
C)
iepc .0-ziam
Vept Bridge
08 Dec 2S -r- .L.-sngr . 60-Utilties' \
1/3/91 C1alms Llst 20 -Police - 70 -Parks Pa.ge
FI -1 18:47 City or hem:Iota Heights -o . 30_-. , ,'" ; • , .,..,
rare . .,,..- , 80 -Planning
- •'..t • 1 ' - '" 40 -CEO .-,-. ".-f..„ 7.- r ,..- 85 -Recycling ^;.",..,':::,,':,:‘,:.: •';. '-..7_,.,. .1-,,T:''' , - -• ,; ,
Temp Check Number 1 ,1 ,, , 90 -Animal Control •
Temp.. , - , _
... . .
, , .
CheCk
' , .
. .
2
3
4
5
6
7
e
4
6
Number vendor Name Rccount cafe Comments Amount
,
1 APO!) Seri pi rig 02 -e72)1 0 st J-iping . 487.44
.•
7
8
• -
,
• ,
1 487.44143
Totals Temp Check Number 1 •
. .
9
11
12
10
11
12
Temp Check Number ....
13
14
15
16
131...,--# "rLt-1 017--`431.0-1-10-T0 ld calls .8.68 ,
14 t? Pi T L.S. T 01 --4ai et•-08:0---atz, Id calls , 18.91 -
, . . '
5 1E' A -r IS- T 073 -401V, -1186-2Z 1c1 calls e...7S - • -
17
18
19
20
16 - ----
17 5 ' 30.36
'
18 Totals Temp Check tftember-
21
22
23
24
19 1. ... - "- -, : • , „ •
. . , ,. - „,.. . - ,
'20 Temp Cneck number 3 .
"
21 •• .., , • ,
25
26
29
30
31
32
23 .3 P7 f Li. 1- -----err:74. lel Iff Of 70 Jan svc ..34.48
'23 3 AT&T 1212 -481 0--enzi--,60 Jan 5 vo - 20. ms .
24 3 AT:FT 15-4310-060-60 Jan svc - 30.92, _ •
25 , 4 Ma) 1211,---AS,112-V-12ta0- ',, an sv • 4.40
, ..., .. ,. , ,,,, ..•
' 26 -- . . , . •
, , •.. . " , .
• '„
27 11. ,
. .„ ' ''.' ."-. ' • 99.80
33
35
36
28 Totals Temp Urieck Nualber __
, 29 • , '
.
.
30 Temp check Number . -,. . , .. ',.;',:,,,.0 7,, .? '.,9q.... . • . .-',....-c,,-,..-f• .....„.-..-':';;$.4 ,,
37
38
39
40
31 » »» - _ „.. . „', •
32 4 Pr..vh Auto Salvage Inc , . ', ol -eel el .. .', :- ,... splys -.„..: - 50.00
• ”. . :" - , '1.' - , ,
33 , • . ,. • . . ',. -------
. , ,, , • ,
41
42
43
44
34 4 ote,.. wrier ,
. , • a -
! 35 Totals Temp Check Number 447
36 / - .
»0
45
37 ..0 Temp C•17E.C.2<,Plumer,9: ...
. ,
. . •
38 ' ' . • .. '
. ,
„ , •
39 ,, • 9141221r/son 1165-430:5-299-29 sp3ys .; ti,” ,,'.„ '93. 08 , - • .. -„ .. „ ,: •,. •
49
50
51
52
40
, •
41 • ". - ' - : 93.93
.. . ,.., .
42 idtais Temp Check Humber 9 0 •-
53
54
55
56
„ .. 0
44Temp Check 14umber • - 6 ° , . . ,. . , ,
. , .,
.-. - - -- - '' :2 •'' . .• ' ;- •":.
57
58
60
46 - -mer can ue tress c.rms - swr bilis bila.44 •
47 - . •__0_0_0_•_ - -.
48 6 . ,
670.4 :
3
• , ,.
al
62,
63”
64
49 Totals rewp Criec/C Numser. , . r
, ..A
., '')
50 • • , '' ".•
... 5 ,,, ,
5/ ' Temp. atieck Humber, ,,, 7 »» a: '- a a>, „ , -,:»'"-- ..
' * , .
65
66
68
52 .
53 7 Berke Companles 08-0010 . , --r{:31^S . " '-.. , = '' z , .
a 99.90
- -
'
69
70
72
54 —
_ , ' -
•
, . .
56 Totals Temp Check IVumber?:. ;, 7 • •. , :' , . ' ,.., 4, ‘.• ,.. -
. , ,
, • . , , ..".: " :• A , , , .
. , .,
73
74',
75^
79
Z. 4" 4 • r •
. •
'
0
)
D
C)
e8 rrec 29?
Fri 18:47
. `•
Temp Check Number :1 ,
City
•'
Claims List
or Mendota Heights
"'
''
.. - ,.
Page i
.
z.
Temp.
Check '
;
r
4
Number Vendor Name account
Code
t.Grmments
r-74Gtlnt.
6
8 8 a J Auto Supply" /Fl-E't2elr7e
-Supply"
splys
16.08
7
----i'er=earel
8 3 a J Auto
Sp?ys
lenae.
8
8 E1 L' J Auto Supply" l2l3 r'_Y10
splys
11.54
8 0 .b J Auto Supply' 2'5-8410
`+i
splys
33.80
10
d 8 tt- a ,utcl—Jup y, 1u=a7+7e
splys
--231-1-x
11
--
12
40
94.91
13
1 C4 a1 s T ey,Jp-Ct eck-Numb2 r
R
«
14
,
15
Temp Check Number ' 9
16
17
9 Battery a Tire Warercuse ell-oele
battery
41.07
19
7 ,..
41=1/
20
Totals Temp Check Number, 9
m ,
°
{
22
temp 2:necK 2V tt�f! Ser^ 307
23
•
24
112e Board of Water Commissioners 08-1-`0281
Nov svc
2^6.22
25
- 312+ board or Water 'Con3m1 SS."1Zr7'fers 01-281310
, ,
-
79C V SVC
,.
'
19. 1211
26
a 118 Board of -Water Commissioners, 41-0018e
Novsvc4-
68.Z2
29
Totals Temp Check Number 10
30
.. - .. - , .,
.,
.
o
r
.r
..• .'t . '
'6.e. Or1Y
,'
31
,. temp tinectr Number
'-
32
-
'
<
K
,.'
33
l 1 Carlson Sewer Service 49-E:81'et
°
; s'
..
Re 8S-68 , ;
, 6,000.00
34
--------
35
12
6y 441h. &FRI
36
Totals Temp Check Number 11
-
,
37
a . , .. ,<
'
^ .;iww •.
38
: Temp Check.Number 1'i _, , ,>
f
-
a
es..s y
6a,;,
39
40
..♦ r -- • - 'r - . . r , _.
.. •
r -
'
- at-
...✓.
41
-
42
le
e5.ea
43
as
3 ovals r erri p ur, erR-TULT88eJ ,
Temp -Check Number 23
-
> '
-
46
y
47
13 Clty Motor Supply . el-eFe18r
splys
1165,.67
48
--
-------
49
1.1
..
,
1X11. b /
50
Totals Temp Check Number 13 n'
<
''
h
° :> 'x
°
, ,,
..
.
52
temp LfiErax Number .i4
53
54
14 City or W St Paul 1-2'4184
interceptor
mtcn
646.e e
55
^- , ".
56
14 , ,
546.810
'F
Totals Temp, Check Number' 14 -` ` ,.
,.
°
r ,.
° ,
23
4
5
67
8
9
0
10
11
12
13
4
750
16
17
18 0 19 '�
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
0
28
29
30 -.)
314
32
33
33540
36
37
39
40
41
443�J2 ('1
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
0
57
�,
58 /
59
60
61
63 \J
6
65
66 ('l
67 l�
68
69
2
3rr 1
e8 rrec 29?
Fri 18:47
. `•
Temp Check Number :1 ,
City
•'
Claims List
or Mendota Heights
"'
''
.. - ,.
Page i
.
z.
Temp.
Check '
;
r
4
Number Vendor Name account
Code
t.Grmments
r-74Gtlnt.
6
8 8 a J Auto Supply" /Fl-E't2elr7e
-Supply"
splys
16.08
7
----i'er=earel
8 3 a J Auto
Sp?ys
lenae.
8
8 E1 L' J Auto Supply" l2l3 r'_Y10
splys
11.54
8 0 .b J Auto Supply' 2'5-8410
`+i
splys
33.80
10
d 8 tt- a ,utcl—Jup y, 1u=a7+7e
splys
--231-1-x
11
--
12
40
94.91
13
1 C4 a1 s T ey,Jp-Ct eck-Numb2 r
R
«
14
,
15
Temp Check Number ' 9
16
17
9 Battery a Tire Warercuse ell-oele
battery
41.07
19
7 ,..
41=1/
20
Totals Temp Check Number, 9
m ,
°
{
22
temp 2:necK 2V tt�f! Ser^ 307
23
•
24
112e Board of Water Commissioners 08-1-`0281
Nov svc
2^6.22
25
- 312+ board or Water 'Con3m1 SS."1Zr7'fers 01-281310
, ,
-
79C V SVC
,.
'
19. 1211
26
a 118 Board of -Water Commissioners, 41-0018e
Novsvc4-
68.Z2
29
Totals Temp Check Number 10
30
.. - .. - , .,
.,
.
o
r
.r
..• .'t . '
'6.e. Or1Y
,'
31
,. temp tinectr Number
'-
32
-
'
<
K
,.'
33
l 1 Carlson Sewer Service 49-E:81'et
°
; s'
..
Re 8S-68 , ;
, 6,000.00
34
--------
35
12
6y 441h. &FRI
36
Totals Temp Check Number 11
-
,
37
a . , .. ,<
'
^ .;iww •.
38
: Temp Check.Number 1'i _, , ,>
f
-
a
es..s y
6a,;,
39
40
..♦ r -- • - 'r - . . r , _.
.. •
r -
'
- at-
...✓.
41
-
42
le
e5.ea
43
as
3 ovals r erri p ur, erR-TULT88eJ ,
Temp -Check Number 23
-
> '
-
46
y
47
13 Clty Motor Supply . el-eFe18r
splys
1165,.67
48
--
-------
49
1.1
..
,
1X11. b /
50
Totals Temp Check Number 13 n'
<
''
h
° :> 'x
°
, ,,
..
.
52
temp LfiErax Number .i4
53
54
14 City or W St Paul 1-2'4184
interceptor
mtcn
646.e e
55
^- , ".
56
14 , ,
546.810
'F
Totals Temp, Check Number' 14 -` ` ,.
,.
°
r ,.
° ,
23
4
5
67
8
9
0
10
11
12
13
4
750
16
17
18 0 19 '�
20
21
23
24
25
26
27
0
28
29
30 -.)
314
32
33
33540
36
37
39
40
41
443�J2 ('1
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
0
57
�,
58 /
59
60
61
63 \J
6
65
66 ('l
67 l�
68
69
2
3rr 1
J
25 Dec 19' Cialrns fist . Page 3
Fri 10:47 City or Mendota Heights
•
Temp Check Number 13 - ' ... , % } .
. - -
1
,2
3
..
Temp..
'Check b
1
2
3
4
4
`5
6
Number Vendor Name NCCount L'ode Comments Amount
3t1 Commi ss! over or Trspt 03-8010 rprs litre.. 1 3
5
6
7
s
7
6
s
--
9
10 112+2'. 13 tC
Totals Temp Check Number 15 11
12
10
11
12
13
Temp Check Number 15 14
16
13
14
15
ec(rWM Center 03 =e3 rprs 4E.i•'1O 17
, -- . -_--• 18
1 619
rib. 00 . 20
16
17
18
Totals Temp 'Check Number 15 27
22
Temp Check Number 17 _ 23
24
19
20
-
25
-' 17 Copy Duplicating Products 02-4303-030-90 ., - copies' '1a.9J • 26
- - - 28
22
23
24
27 11. �3 29
Totals Temp Check Number 27 k .. 30
31
32
25
26
27
Temp L•heck Number 1 -
8
33
.. .. -. - .. 34
1S Coneveras.•Reloading Sply• -,02 -0020- _ '• splys " " 1S5. 1i3 36
36
28
29
30
-- ---"-- 37
19 258.01:2 38
Totals Temp Check Number^ 18 1 1, • , , ; , . ,,,.,,, 'e,,.,''", .1 ; , . • • • 39
40
31
32
33
- 41
Temp 'Check Number 25 < > ° .'" • 42
,. . > 43
44
34
35
36
13 Dakota County Auditor 01-0020 city share election ✓39.90 45
-- • •- 46
25 925.90 47 5
48
37
38
39
' Totals 49 Temp Check Number ° 1.b --
._fie + .. g ., : 1 ;. ,. .,� ,. °, < "1• 50
Temp Check Number i21 k < a 57
t 52
40
41
42
53
ee Dakota County Ch of P .5 Assn 02-4404-000-00 2552 dues • •33. Val , ' 54
-" .-�-.._ 55
56
43
44
i , x r y � 2I0. 57
Totals Temp Check Number i°'tZ+•, .... '' < ' s8,
- - .•. - 60
46
47
48
7ernp Check Numbers • 61
•62,
L2 James Danielson 0M -442D-205-19 Jan allow 2:x.50 63
' 64
• -
49
51
—
4.
•
'Totals Temp Check Number,. a e1. ,.1n .,, -. 1 ``�- ,,. v ,' .675
sa
52
53
54
69
Temp Check Number a_... . , 70
71
n
65
56
V
LL Denn15 3701 rnbnt Y11-r't/13-1Nc`$1-b Jan allow.3,=Y1.3'11c1 .73
-- _ ,,., ! • I < . ., - ,• --< 74/
.,,,_ 1 a ¢+. 0079
r rtt n 7 5 IPM” T :t1Prt, ITT11Mflt.P. .,•.
0
0
if
V
p
J
25 Dec 19' Cialrns fist . Page 3
Fri 10:47 City or Mendota Heights
•
Temp Check Number 13 - ' ... , % } .
. - -
1
,2
3
..
Temp..
'Check b
1
2
3
4
4
`5
6
Number Vendor Name NCCount L'ode Comments Amount
3t1 Commi ss! over or Trspt 03-8010 rprs litre.. 1 3
5
6
7
s
7
6
s
--
9
10 112+2'. 13 tC
Totals Temp Check Number 15 11
12
10
11
12
13
Temp Check Number 15 14
16
13
14
15
ec(rWM Center 03 =e3 rprs 4E.i•'1O 17
, -- . -_--• 18
1 619
rib. 00 . 20
16
17
18
Totals Temp 'Check Number 15 27
22
Temp Check Number 17 _ 23
24
19
20
-
25
-' 17 Copy Duplicating Products 02-4303-030-90 ., - copies' '1a.9J • 26
- - - 28
22
23
24
27 11. �3 29
Totals Temp Check Number 27 k .. 30
31
32
25
26
27
Temp L•heck Number 1 -
8
33
.. .. -. - .. 34
1S Coneveras.•Reloading Sply• -,02 -0020- _ '• splys " " 1S5. 1i3 36
36
28
29
30
-- ---"-- 37
19 258.01:2 38
Totals Temp Check Number^ 18 1 1, • , , ; , . ,,,.,,, 'e,,.,''", .1 ; , . • • • 39
40
31
32
33
- 41
Temp 'Check Number 25 < > ° .'" • 42
,. . > 43
44
34
35
36
13 Dakota County Auditor 01-0020 city share election ✓39.90 45
-- • •- 46
25 925.90 47 5
48
37
38
39
' Totals 49 Temp Check Number ° 1.b --
._fie + .. g ., : 1 ;. ,. .,� ,. °, < "1• 50
Temp Check Number i21 k < a 57
t 52
40
41
42
53
ee Dakota County Ch of P .5 Assn 02-4404-000-00 2552 dues • •33. Val , ' 54
-" .-�-.._ 55
56
43
44
i , x r y � 2I0. 57
Totals Temp Check Number i°'tZ+•, .... '' < ' s8,
- - .•. - 60
46
47
48
7ernp Check Numbers • 61
•62,
L2 James Danielson 0M -442D-205-19 Jan allow 2:x.50 63
' 64
• -
49
51
—
4.
•
'Totals Temp Check Number,. a e1. ,.1n .,, -. 1 ``�- ,,. v ,' .675
sa
52
53
54
69
Temp Check Number a_... . , 70
71
n
65
56
V
LL Denn15 3701 rnbnt Y11-r't/13-1Nc`$1-b Jan allow.3,=Y1.3'11c1 .73
-- _ ,,., ! • I < . ., - ,• --< 74/
.,,,_ 1 a ¢+. 0079
r rtt n 7 5 IPM” T :t1Prt, ITT11Mflt.P. .,•.
0
0
if
V
p
L
•-\
es sec 29' C 2 a 2 rns Llst: Page 4 . • .
Fri 18:4-.; City of Me.sotic-,ta Heights • , •'y s',..
,' :7. '., . :•''' -`.,,, ' 1- .,,. ''...›!..: ' ' ---e--`,:so 4..4. -9'''*,-i',.?' '- ' •• ." '- - ' s,
. ,
Temp Check Number ez ..
2
3
, , , • -:, , : - . , . 4 „ , • -
Temp. • . . • .,
, . .
. ,
f8C4: . . , , .
1
2
3
4
5
6
711.077 en 'I., clot- Name 14C<CC:eti/if -CEO-a', Cconments Hmottnt
'
93 Fielstone flatslnetry Inc. 02-4131-080--E0 ?e Oarlock Jan 7o3.00
5
6
7
s
_ .
e2s -11
Totals Tear ti e ez . , . -12
9
110
,1 1 Temp Check Number e4 •
12
13
14
15'
1G
13 s'.4 1-Isher Photo 3uppiy
14 . — . ----- :
, ,
8.4 .
' .
;:i
20
16 otals Tem Che k Nionber —a 21
22
17 23
T18emp enecic Ntunber
19 ' " 25
' .
20 t -l5 Da.scorn or PIlmn Jr?- . 01-4`..0316 , • - , , . rprs . - ..,, ,„ , ems- tore!, < ...,,- • , , , , , 2 ,
21 ":" , — , . 27
, 28
22 .e..3 270•3700 29
.
23 Totals Temp enecis Number en . - . . 30
' 31
24 32
25SETS05-al, , 8.s.: ''.::: ' 33
, , .,,
2
27>.., "*.....le f3oodyear Service 'Store , 01-8010 ' .., . . part s1n.--:43" ,...f". -• .••,,,"'" ,, '''', 18...Z0 • • • '
.,
28 •"-- -- 37
29 8.8 . • 18.. 'ne 38
30 Totals Temp Check Number es - -. , , -. • ., ' • -, ,:•.-' 4 ,,,,,,:.. ..' ••„, .......,-,.-4,,,,,,,g; .r‹.:-,,-,, ,-;frt-':..:. .'it-,-,-.., ,I, -.L , ,,- .•:.-''i - -" '
' 40
3 ,.. . ..= =7" .=. , < 41
',.. 0,' .42
32 Temp Check Number ' Z7 , .:;.,.. % ".". , .,' ,'.' ,
43
. „ . .
3
34 1.:/ 1.100aW21,1 inOustraes inC vi -b.`1452 , 0 5 . 45
35 --, . ------ . 46
.
36 1.1:-.7 ' Ze.:0-13tIt 47
as
----,- , , 49
3 „? lot s stop ires.R-70-us , , ,
• ' ` ; f'' , ,.- ... so
. ^ V..
35 • Temp 817eck Nunsber , , , , ,. ... , .‘" , , '.... ' * v. i. .... • " . , v:, , 51
40 53
. ,
= , , ,
4188 Hager, Office eq 01-E.01e - , r gird , , • -8,34. 80 . 54
' , 55
42 • ee Hagen Office Eq 01 --e0212, r prs • .,• - ••• . - en. Irret a
5
— a a .,, a. ; , '" ,a: a , ,
44 , 36 ..i< ''' •1..'' ".*. , ,, 30.9. 9'er - , ' 5
',21, y, ..' - 5; -, ,. 5
4 - Totals Temp Check Number '' , . , ,.,„ , •", ..,• *r. •„=„ '*„,, •?,'''," :,".,''', , , .- -', -
46
42 Temp Check Number es - - - . t 62
.
• 63
as - .. . • „
64
49 " --- 4 ... 1 • 65
4.4 . *' _ 66
50 , '. • .1";
..„ ,*,,,, . . i - ''''''r.
51 ""•*‘" . 3'3 * " '. •.>
.,
52 6
. ==. ; ...- "' 70
5,3 TempCheck Number " 30 , * . • 71
2
55. . " ' 4: ' ' 4- - 7 3
., 3e linos: Commerclal t•red2t .." 017E010 ' , , ,',' ''.;' , -SPlyS '•'' ''''''. %., 9 ,- . f.' .4.9i2k. 3Z,, ';',, 74
75
„, • , , „ r * '', 4 ' .4" .. ",-,• • r , <4 ' - r . - 7
0
L
•-\
es sec 29' C 2 a 2 rns Llst: Page 4 . • .
Fri 18:4-.; City of Me.sotic-,ta Heights • , •'y s',..
,' :7. '., . :•''' -`.,,, ' 1- .,,. ''...›!..: ' ' ---e--`,:so 4..4. -9'''*,-i',.?' '- ' •• ." '- - ' s,
. ,
Temp Check Number ez ..
2
3
, , , • -:, , : - . , . 4 „ , • -
Temp. • . . • .,
, . .
. ,
f8C4: . . , , .
1
2
3
4
5
6
711.077 en 'I., clot- Name 14C<CC:eti/if -CEO-a', Cconments Hmottnt
'
93 Fielstone flatslnetry Inc. 02-4131-080--E0 ?e Oarlock Jan 7o3.00
5
6
7
s
_ .
e2s -11
Totals Tear ti e ez . , . -12
9
110
,1 1 Temp Check Number e4 •
12
13
14
15'
1G
13 s'.4 1-Isher Photo 3uppiy
14 . — . ----- :
, ,
8.4 .
' .
;:i
20
16 otals Tem Che k Nionber —a 21
22
17 23
T18emp enecic Ntunber
19 ' " 25
' .
20 t -l5 Da.scorn or PIlmn Jr?- . 01-4`..0316 , • - , , . rprs . - ..,, ,„ , ems- tore!, < ...,,- • , , , , , 2 ,
21 ":" , — , . 27
, 28
22 .e..3 270•3700 29
.
23 Totals Temp enecis Number en . - . . 30
' 31
24 32
25SETS05-al, , 8.s.: ''.::: ' 33
, , .,,
2
27>.., "*.....le f3oodyear Service 'Store , 01-8010 ' .., . . part s1n.--:43" ,...f". -• .••,,,"'" ,, '''', 18...Z0 • • • '
.,
28 •"-- -- 37
29 8.8 . • 18.. 'ne 38
30 Totals Temp Check Number es - -. , , -. • ., ' • -, ,:•.-' 4 ,,,,,,:.. ..' ••„, .......,-,.-4,,,,,,,g; .r‹.:-,,-,, ,-;frt-':..:. .'it-,-,-.., ,I, -.L , ,,- .•:.-''i - -" '
' 40
3 ,.. . ..= =7" .=. , < 41
',.. 0,' .42
32 Temp Check Number ' Z7 , .:;.,.. % ".". , .,' ,'.' ,
43
. „ . .
3
34 1.:/ 1.100aW21,1 inOustraes inC vi -b.`1452 , 0 5 . 45
35 --, . ------ . 46
.
36 1.1:-.7 ' Ze.:0-13tIt 47
as
----,- , , 49
3 „? lot s stop ires.R-70-us , , ,
• ' ` ; f'' , ,.- ... so
. ^ V..
35 • Temp 817eck Nunsber , , , , ,. ... , .‘" , , '.... ' * v. i. .... • " . , v:, , 51
40 53
. ,
= , , ,
4188 Hager, Office eq 01-E.01e - , r gird , , • -8,34. 80 . 54
' , 55
42 • ee Hagen Office Eq 01 --e0212, r prs • .,• - ••• . - en. Irret a
5
— a a .,, a. ; , '" ,a: a , ,
44 , 36 ..i< ''' •1..'' ".*. , ,, 30.9. 9'er - , ' 5
',21, y, ..' - 5; -, ,. 5
4 - Totals Temp Check Number '' , . , ,.,„ , •", ..,• *r. •„=„ '*„,, •?,'''," :,".,''', , , .- -', -
46
42 Temp Check Number es - - - . t 62
.
• 63
as - .. . • „
64
49 " --- 4 ... 1 • 65
4.4 . *' _ 66
50 , '. • .1";
..„ ,*,,,, . . i - ''''''r.
51 ""•*‘" . 3'3 * " '. •.>
.,
52 6
. ==. ; ...- "' 70
5,3 TempCheck Number " 30 , * . • 71
2
55. . " ' 4: ' ' 4- - 7 3
., 3e linos: Commerclal t•red2t .." 017E010 ' , , ,',' ''.;' , -SPlyS '•'' ''''''. %., 9 ,- . f.' .4.9i2k. 3Z,, ';',, 74
75
„, • , , „ r * '', 4 ' .4" .. ",-,• • r , <4 ' - r . - 7
0
eO Dec 2? Cl alms List • Page M
Pr2 "20:4i City of Mendota Heights ..
Temp Check Number .30
1
2
3
<.. - -.
> -Temp. - " x <
Cht7Ck - A
1
2
4
5
7
8
q.
6
s
Number V$rdor Name M`CCC,unt Ce a Comments Amount
30 ?<rrox Commercial Credit 01•-e02Yt spays t28. 96
7
g
g
--
6121 317.01
Totals 3emp 1:J7et.`x Number 30 '
9
t?d
tt
12
10
11 Temp Check Number 32
12
13
14
13 31 hnutsorr r'ubb25F7 Ser1/3ce Ir3-i=•elo 23ec svc •
-----
- . -
15 32 - x.93
17
18
19
20
21
22.
23,
24
16 Totals Ternp Check Number .31
17
1g Temp Check Number 3•
19. - . .
20 3e 242ntbail 1rt.dwest " el-e02>T ° spays , :30.32 , •
21 ...._ - . -- --28
25
26,
27
22 3'- 30. 30
23 Totals Temp Check Number 3a
24
29
30
31
32
26 Temp CnecH }VumbeJ' 3.3 . - - - _ ..
27 33 1<echs Office Macf72 nes • ,a1 -.202 f2 sw 4se. 00
r'
33
36
29 33 J<r^ecbs orrice Machines ' •" ' ep y5
2 -- _-_-_-
$
30 66. 807.90
37
38
39
40
31 ' To Temp- tMecx Mlsmber .,,, 33 _ - •. - , - ,.
,42
33 Temp Check Member 34 ; z - ,. ' � .. - ° , < •, a . - .. < .r " ,
41
a3
44
4
35 34 L £ L 0 ea x;:0.3 Jar, dues ae . 00 -
_ __
36 �_
45
46
47
48
37 34• - /. .- a Lc-�. ?tth - . s
3 8 Tat al s Temp Check Humber a 34' > , - �✓ k YE` Y ;;.
49
50
51
62
4A 3emp Creech 1' t:Jntbe?' 39 _ _
41
42 30 Suy !<ullander 00-2°020 - mi re2mb 46.;59
53
54
55
57
59
59
13uyJ<u1 2aiH7er ; 1K72-t'Qi1>?7 .; .. E'Rji Ih9'3 ..q LZ37-67, .r ° -
Oy 30 Buy hullander 05-1 220 r..y exp re2mb 3:5.93
21en 3 i'tl:. 7tti
47 Totals Temp Check Number 30
48 - - '64
61
62
63
49 Temp ChecH Number. ab, a .. ,, 3> -. ., . ",
50 36 La Bass Mfg d Sales, 02-;`2'10 4. rprS a, . 1?70.94, s•
55
68
69
70
71
72
52 .3b La Has NYg t<• Jaie5 1Cr2 c -'R,20 rpe-s 114./0
s3 36 La Hass Mfg d Sales •_ rprs ao- 60
54 ......_ - ------
55 2 08 :. . .'6. 3•9 ,. ..
56 ToSel s Temp Check Number v 36 " `
7
774
��t
eO Dec 2? Cl alms List • Page M
Pr2 "20:4i City of Mendota Heights ..
Temp Check Number .30
1
2
3
<.. - -.
> -Temp. - " x <
Cht7Ck - A
1
2
4
5
7
8
q.
6
s
Number V$rdor Name M`CCC,unt Ce a Comments Amount
30 ?<rrox Commercial Credit 01•-e02Yt spays t28. 96
7
g
g
--
6121 317.01
Totals 3emp 1:J7et.`x Number 30 '
9
t?d
tt
12
10
11 Temp Check Number 32
12
13
14
13 31 hnutsorr r'ubb25F7 Ser1/3ce Ir3-i=•elo 23ec svc •
-----
- . -
15 32 - x.93
17
18
19
20
21
22.
23,
24
16 Totals Ternp Check Number .31
17
1g Temp Check Number 3•
19. - . .
20 3e 242ntbail 1rt.dwest " el-e02>T ° spays , :30.32 , •
21 ...._ - . -- --28
25
26,
27
22 3'- 30. 30
23 Totals Temp Check Number 3a
24
29
30
31
32
26 Temp CnecH }VumbeJ' 3.3 . - - - _ ..
27 33 1<echs Office Macf72 nes • ,a1 -.202 f2 sw 4se. 00
r'
33
36
29 33 J<r^ecbs orrice Machines ' •" ' ep y5
2 -- _-_-_-
$
30 66. 807.90
37
38
39
40
31 ' To Temp- tMecx Mlsmber .,,, 33 _ - •. - , - ,.
,42
33 Temp Check Member 34 ; z - ,. ' � .. - ° , < •, a . - .. < .r " ,
41
a3
44
4
35 34 L £ L 0 ea x;:0.3 Jar, dues ae . 00 -
_ __
36 �_
45
46
47
48
37 34• - /. .- a Lc-�. ?tth - . s
3 8 Tat al s Temp Check Humber a 34' > , - �✓ k YE` Y ;;.
49
50
51
62
4A 3emp Creech 1' t:Jntbe?' 39 _ _
41
42 30 Suy !<ullander 00-2°020 - mi re2mb 46.;59
53
54
55
57
59
59
13uyJ<u1 2aiH7er ; 1K72-t'Qi1>?7 .; .. E'Rji Ih9'3 ..q LZ37-67, .r ° -
Oy 30 Buy hullander 05-1 220 r..y exp re2mb 3:5.93
21en 3 i'tl:. 7tti
47 Totals Temp Check Number 30
48 - - '64
61
62
63
49 Temp ChecH Number. ab, a .. ,, 3> -. ., . ",
50 36 La Bass Mfg d Sales, 02-;`2'10 4. rprS a, . 1?70.94, s•
55
68
69
70
71
72
52 .3b La Has NYg t<• Jaie5 1Cr2 c -'R,20 rpe-s 114./0
s3 36 La Hass Mfg d Sales •_ rprs ao- 60
54 ......_ - ------
55 2 08 :. . .'6. 3•9 ,. ..
56 ToSel s Temp Check Number v 36 " `
7
774
��t
0 •'•
.4 • * • •-•.•
• • ,.
4i
)4L
EL
,
,•,,
,
-
, 4 '
, . • _
•
• ,,, ,,
'
,,..-,,:,, -_,,,..,,69 ',,:•; ••
‘,. - ...,..-
- , . '
- 4.7...1 4,W.L V-fr
-
• . • VT • ' ,4M4Wittf 4,L4a dwaL
a
8s
ZL
.
.
-
045,
aactwn44 8t,za4.43 dwas steak's
'
09
C5
zs--
,,
•
- eo 'ear
•
:... = 4, -
wad •-
• ""- aravid • r‘er ,..,.:'•
' sua-id Use-
44,4 z• :' = -4- ' ' izte-•iziee--ceeo-cie „.",
---
• , ..1 i -t sad ava3 INgL4 Ws,
7. - - .• d a• -e saa4rtaa 4:7944 .7.0
,‘-,Ikt221aaga-ajaa.kr....,,-atc.........._•,611
d 64 sa.94$.4a3 Pakt ZO
d 44 sas44.4aU P844 .00
,d $.4 s...4.a.34.4aa Paw ;lir
' ..
d 84 s•gag.4-433 Pala86
‘. -• ' .3 f -C saa4t4,93 PS44 430" - •"
..4 saa24.4a•-•4 oa4i ,Tuv,- '
•Clir ,„(aquinu 3fa,c.f9 dwa..
LS
at,
LP
9P
CP
2:8.
Lv
08zs o,
9
9
L9
,
•
•
.
.
09 -*Ct,'
gret "zee ' r
.
,
,
..-
.,.
-
• . -,,
;4 • ,,,...„,",
.itta,fd
• waad (Avg-
.' wa,..4d ser
mead us
,,:, r„. „ • 4 utestd ur--",,,
- ,coa.rd met1.114;--
usi ' -
ez.-e4e- re r o•-• re
• 05:4-1,11.0.21- EC r o- re
,- a21.
;, 1, G`-el.Z.43- cc riv- re -., '
;era- re .: x,'
' 484 Q4-7- ' L.171
9
LS
.
2
,
n •
"'
• 'r..6. Tege k7.• -
z. er -farz• 6 r.
95
Es
,
..
,88
,,
. .
. . .
.
,
.
-
os•
68
..,
. ...
"•' ., , '''
.
;
., , • „ . r ro ,,
,..
.,
,
-LS
' ...4 aqion 04 8coat4a. awes sie44.74.
.-.• ,-.,-. _. ro- 7.'.
6E
8E
LC
84,
98
Sta
''
'
-
ee •"c.....It
- •
'
4 San P LE,Gr
0.:„.-4-eze-oetro- re
—'
...4aansea,..4s kwow rt..
t 6.,, >4,Datict dwa;
n
GC
VC
EC
ZE
LC
OE
8Z
69utZ
88
2:8,
,
,
,
.•
. .
.
„ '4
4,
•
-
,
. ;
.„,..•• .
, .
'-,
' , -•
, .
''''',: • .
..-.:' ' ....;!..% ' •. '
.
„ ' •••'
, .
... , , •
' ,•' .. . . ''''zi.. --•
,
. s
• . ,
. , , • -
, ,
' .
*
---• �2:�.-2:i3C
sradiumt
,..
...4agionw Nosua dwas. sre4os.
-
,..- ,Uv" '
" -
sa4.erE5
ov
6C
LE
• '
-
,
.
•••
•---- -I,
PE
EC
EEEZZ
,
•
"e4G-
•:
rk
, .•
°
,
.
x .,.
,
amonw *9e. dwl
.aad(-.r4
, " .Ge
-, - „ 4
- „ •
aa4o,s..4g0*dOc'_
--
na-4
2..4 4 1n
a
SZ
PC
CZ
OE •
6Z
0z..,
--
-
:0a
9Z
•'
,
•
.
, 4
..
-KEe0r•.-
.LZ
• .
. ,. .
.6ms„
, ,
.Co
. ,6ZZ1
n
- a4 ws
•aa•••
02:9Z••
iC89ZLi2:
PC
ZZ
''6F—,.
e
ae..41-
qunw0dwas sg
e
--
et
L1 '
95v ttz
8t
LI
.,
„
-
•
'
aturaa rea ,
More uer '
lare- r
,' e
,
ra-er r-gurnod•oa--_
rrmesewou.
, me-seJ04i- Pt
1I
EL
81
Et
9SZSLg8c8
.4dunw doles
s:_Z.VQtng4.1'roL0CC
-raciwnw #f,4343 dso4
gg_.34r4_
2:1
11
01
Itttt
91
6
•
--.--
o4..rzr
.t•-••e.1£.[.1li.•
,
r
.
uem
cas uurtoass.._s_.i.f
8
4
9
e4
•
u500en000.a4i.z-w
soreadop
ar.eL.4..
2-riza
pov
... tda,,.m,a
asnduuaas meuancno.e,
UMW ..4acunw
9
g
8
.
z
1
,
-,
"
-
.;
,
t
.
,
- •
'
.
, ,
- ..
acf3d,
thaal
c
...,,
,
•
.-.'
u " •
..9
ae.d
..
uarpeupwaw ,to T3
gr7 sa;er1
asq0414*dwas
7/ r -r
, -sr •vacr 9:0
c
c
0
0
0
A
0 •'•
.4 • * • •-•.•
• • ,.
4i
)4L
EL
,
,•,,
,
-
, 4 '
, . • _
•
• ,,, ,,
'
,,..-,,:,, -_,,,..,,69 ',,:•; ••
‘,. - ...,..-
- , . '
- 4.7...1 4,W.L V-fr
-
• . • VT • ' ,4M4Wittf 4,L4a dwaL
a
8s
ZL
.
.
-
045,
aactwn44 8t,za4.43 dwas steak's
'
09
C5
zs--
,,
•
- eo 'ear
•
:... = 4, -
wad •-
• ""- aravid • r‘er ,..,.:'•
' sua-id Use-
44,4 z• :' = -4- ' ' izte-•iziee--ceeo-cie „.",
---
• , ..1 i -t sad ava3 INgL4 Ws,
7. - - .• d a• -e saa4rtaa 4:7944 .7.0
,‘-,Ikt221aaga-ajaa.kr....,,-atc.........._•,611
d 64 sa.94$.4a3 Pakt ZO
d 44 sas44.4aU P844 .00
,d $.4 s...4.a.34.4aa Paw ;lir
' ..
d 84 s•gag.4-433 Pala86
‘. -• ' .3 f -C saa4t4,93 PS44 430" - •"
..4 saa24.4a•-•4 oa4i ,Tuv,- '
•Clir ,„(aquinu 3fa,c.f9 dwa..
LS
at,
LP
9P
CP
2:8.
Lv
08zs o,
9
9
L9
,
•
•
.
.
09 -*Ct,'
gret "zee ' r
.
,
,
..-
.,.
-
• . -,,
;4 • ,,,...„,",
.itta,fd
• waad (Avg-
.' wa,..4d ser
mead us
,,:, r„. „ • 4 utestd ur--",,,
- ,coa.rd met1.114;--
usi ' -
ez.-e4e- re r o•-• re
• 05:4-1,11.0.21- EC r o- re
,- a21.
;, 1, G`-el.Z.43- cc riv- re -., '
;era- re .: x,'
' 484 Q4-7- ' L.171
9
LS
.
2
,
n •
"'
• 'r..6. Tege k7.• -
z. er -farz• 6 r.
95
Es
,
..
,88
,,
. .
. . .
.
,
.
-
os•
68
..,
. ...
"•' ., , '''
.
;
., , • „ . r ro ,,
,..
.,
,
-LS
' ...4 aqion 04 8coat4a. awes sie44.74.
.-.• ,-.,-. _. ro- 7.'.
6E
8E
LC
84,
98
Sta
''
'
-
ee •"c.....It
- •
'
4 San P LE,Gr
0.:„.-4-eze-oetro- re
—'
...4aansea,..4s kwow rt..
t 6.,, >4,Datict dwa;
n
GC
VC
EC
ZE
LC
OE
8Z
69utZ
88
2:8,
,
,
,
.•
. .
.
„ '4
4,
•
-
,
. ;
.„,..•• .
, .
'-,
' , -•
, .
''''',: • .
..-.:' ' ....;!..% ' •. '
.
„ ' •••'
, .
... , , •
' ,•' .. . . ''''zi.. --•
,
. s
• . ,
. , , • -
, ,
' .
*
---• �2:�.-2:i3C
sradiumt
,..
...4agionw Nosua dwas. sre4os.
-
,..- ,Uv" '
" -
sa4.erE5
ov
6C
LE
• '
-
,
.
•••
•---- -I,
PE
EC
EEEZZ
,
•
"e4G-
•:
rk
, .•
°
,
.
x .,.
,
amonw *9e. dwl
.aad(-.r4
, " .Ge
-, - „ 4
- „ •
aa4o,s..4g0*dOc'_
--
na-4
2..4 4 1n
a
SZ
PC
CZ
OE •
6Z
0z..,
--
-
:0a
9Z
•'
,
•
.
, 4
..
-KEe0r•.-
.LZ
• .
. ,. .
.6ms„
, ,
.Co
. ,6ZZ1
n
- a4 ws
•aa•••
02:9Z••
iC89ZLi2:
PC
ZZ
''6F—,.
e
ae..41-
qunw0dwas sg
e
--
et
L1 '
95v ttz
8t
LI
.,
„
-
•
'
aturaa rea ,
More uer '
lare- r
,' e
,
ra-er r-gurnod•oa--_
rrmesewou.
, me-seJ04i- Pt
1I
EL
81
Et
9SZSLg8c8
.4dunw doles
s:_Z.VQtng4.1'roL0CC
-raciwnw #f,4343 dso4
gg_.34r4_
2:1
11
01
Itttt
91
6
•
--.--
o4..rzr
.t•-••e.1£.[.1li.•
,
r
.
uem
cas uurtoass.._s_.i.f
8
4
9
e4
•
u500en000.a4i.z-w
soreadop
ar.eL.4..
2-riza
pov
... tda,,.m,a
asnduuaas meuancno.e,
UMW ..4acunw
9
g
8
.
z
1
,
-,
"
-
.;
,
t
.
,
- •
'
.
, ,
- ..
acf3d,
thaal
c
...,,
,
•
.-.'
u " •
..9
ae.d
..
uarpeupwaw ,to T3
gr7 sa;er1
asq0414*dwas
7/ r -r
, -sr •vacr 9:0
c
c
0
0
0
A
ea flYec 299-- Claims List Page 7
Fri 101'47 'City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 43 •' f f
1
2
- . ,
Temp. , , ° -
Check •
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
Number vendor Name Account 'C•ade Comme»Ts Hmount
43 Metro Waste Control 27-3373 Jan svc 8,796.et8cr
6
8
8
7
a
--
tie ^ 35,049. ere- ,
Totals Temp Check Number 43
9
10
11
12
10
'11
12
Temp Check Number 44
13
14
15
16
13
14
115
44 Med C2 t o umbi a Inc 02-201-0- spivs 4n.7-3-4, 17
—_ - ' 18
_ r
' 44 3.34 19
2
16
17
16
Totals Temp irheck Number 44 21
\ 22
Temp Check Number 43 23
24
19
`20
21
< 25
43 Midwest Business Products 241-•a eae spays - •21.54 °• - :26
27
43 Midwest Business Products ' 77+2-2'`Q+1et - spays': ".. 13.8B'' - -,- 2a
22
23
24
-- 29
981 i'3.63 30
Totals Temp Check Number 45 31
32
25
26
. - 33
. • • - "' '` ,
Temp check Number 4Ea34
• 36
28
29
30
46 M2 n» tel reaa L'o 52--c`0X0 Dec svc f.5121 37
_,_ ---- 38
46 , „ 7. X40 39
ao
31
32
33
J"ota151`eMp trheck Number 41
- , .. . �% ;. t - s .. , 42
Temp Check Number 47 x ., ,. ", 43
44
34
35
36
45
47 Minn Mutual Life Ins eft-eet74 Jan prem 42.95 - 46
47 Minn Mutual Life ins 1 -4232-•¢e+2-eel Jan prem 3.10 a7
49
37
39
39
47 Minn MCtt tial L2 feaYrs $2-42.j2 -7dlid-/Yr Jan prem 1.%Yt 49
_.._ u • ' °. � d `
"
.,. . < •. .. i °,y - + - t . . 50
242 .. -•_ F _ " > '�_
48. 80 51
. 52
40
41
42
Totals Temp Check Number4/
53
54.
Temp Check Number 45 • 55
` 56
430
44
45
•, ,f - 57
» ' 43 Minnesota Benefit Assn " '8t1-328074 • " Jan prem Y: , ,r :, L 1.74'' ;1 b < x.4" 5S:
. 48 Minnesota Benefit Assn ..- . , 01-4232-2101001-4232-2101001-4232-21010' , . . Jan' prep •, 188- pl t 59
60
46
47
48
49 Minnesota benefit Assn 43.32 -2 Jan prem .54D'..412, 61
48 Minnesota Demerit Assn eti•-4132-eee ee Jan prem ' 995.710 62
48 Minnesota Benefit Assn 02-4231-050-50 - Jan prem 22+8. 84 - 63
64
49
50
N 40 mi nnesota Nenelri t NSsn 101 -43 J2.-0 f - - an prem °, - _ - 95 121 65
° 48 MinnesotaBenefit Assn . 25-4231-060-60 _ .. . - ^ .. •, Jan= prem ' > . - 218. 88 - „j. ,. 'f < 66
67
- , ° 68
52
53
54
.5.51--.
• ‘--.,of 38. 3•
Totals Temp Check Number 477 _ - - > - 70
.. 71
72
65
t57
Tem¢ L ,71 Numb `3 - 73
76
49 Minn State F2 re Dept Assn 01-4404-030-Z0 , , - = 27
1992 'dues" • . . , - • F 9. Brei ' ' ,.
0
0
0
Q'
0
0
ea flYec 299-- Claims List Page 7
Fri 101'47 'City of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 43 •' f f
1
2
- . ,
Temp. , , ° -
Check •
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
Number vendor Name Account 'C•ade Comme»Ts Hmount
43 Metro Waste Control 27-3373 Jan svc 8,796.et8cr
6
8
8
7
a
--
tie ^ 35,049. ere- ,
Totals Temp Check Number 43
9
10
11
12
10
'11
12
Temp Check Number 44
13
14
15
16
13
14
115
44 Med C2 t o umbi a Inc 02-201-0- spivs 4n.7-3-4, 17
—_ - ' 18
_ r
' 44 3.34 19
2
16
17
16
Totals Temp irheck Number 44 21
\ 22
Temp Check Number 43 23
24
19
`20
21
< 25
43 Midwest Business Products 241-•a eae spays - •21.54 °• - :26
27
43 Midwest Business Products ' 77+2-2'`Q+1et - spays': ".. 13.8B'' - -,- 2a
22
23
24
-- 29
981 i'3.63 30
Totals Temp Check Number 45 31
32
25
26
. - 33
. • • - "' '` ,
Temp check Number 4Ea34
• 36
28
29
30
46 M2 n» tel reaa L'o 52--c`0X0 Dec svc f.5121 37
_,_ ---- 38
46 , „ 7. X40 39
ao
31
32
33
J"ota151`eMp trheck Number 41
- , .. . �% ;. t - s .. , 42
Temp Check Number 47 x ., ,. ", 43
44
34
35
36
45
47 Minn Mutual Life Ins eft-eet74 Jan prem 42.95 - 46
47 Minn Mutual Life ins 1 -4232-•¢e+2-eel Jan prem 3.10 a7
49
37
39
39
47 Minn MCtt tial L2 feaYrs $2-42.j2 -7dlid-/Yr Jan prem 1.%Yt 49
_.._ u • ' °. � d `
"
.,. . < •. .. i °,y - + - t . . 50
242 .. -•_ F _ " > '�_
48. 80 51
. 52
40
41
42
Totals Temp Check Number4/
53
54.
Temp Check Number 45 • 55
` 56
430
44
45
•, ,f - 57
» ' 43 Minnesota Benefit Assn " '8t1-328074 • " Jan prem Y: , ,r :, L 1.74'' ;1 b < x.4" 5S:
. 48 Minnesota Benefit Assn ..- . , 01-4232-2101001-4232-2101001-4232-21010' , . . Jan' prep •, 188- pl t 59
60
46
47
48
49 Minnesota benefit Assn 43.32 -2 Jan prem .54D'..412, 61
48 Minnesota Demerit Assn eti•-4132-eee ee Jan prem ' 995.710 62
48 Minnesota Benefit Assn 02-4231-050-50 - Jan prem 22+8. 84 - 63
64
49
50
N 40 mi nnesota Nenelri t NSsn 101 -43 J2.-0 f - - an prem °, - _ - 95 121 65
° 48 MinnesotaBenefit Assn . 25-4231-060-60 _ .. . - ^ .. •, Jan= prem ' > . - 218. 88 - „j. ,. 'f < 66
67
- , ° 68
52
53
54
.5.51--.
• ‘--.,of 38. 3•
Totals Temp Check Number 477 _ - - > - 70
.. 71
72
65
t57
Tem¢ L ,71 Numb `3 - 73
76
49 Minn State F2 re Dept Assn 01-4404-030-Z0 , , - = 27
1992 'dues" • . . , - • F 9. Brei ' ' ,.
0
0
0
Q'
0
0
0'
0
0
c)
O
Q
0
03 Dec 19^-
Fri 20:47
Temp Check Number 49
Claims List
City or Mendota heights
_
Page
,
•
5
1
2
Temp.
2
3
Check - -
•
-
4
a
4
Number 'Vendor Name
,r:ccoern Code
Comments s
Nm ,un tr
5
5
-
-
6
6
49
90.00
7
8
Totals tette ec) Number
49
,
9
8
10
9
Temp Check Number 98
•
_
11
12
10
13
1150
Minnesota Torr. Inc
02-00121
splys
�29.0O
14
12
90 Minnesota Tara Inc
01-8010
spays
36.00
15
16
13
90-Mi7,rfesCr-t"a-Toro-Inc
02-0028
spays
3:00
17
14
--
;
"
-----
>
18
15
150
:.4. ell
79
20
16
totals J P.mp hec3( N7L bees
'0
21
22
17
23
1a
Temp Check Number 91
24
19-
25
20•
21
92 Minr, Telephone Installers
--
02 -1E -ale'
,•
'
installation
-
..
<
665.8124
---_-
•
26
27
28
22
' `
6.1.lee
29
23
TbGai5 Temp CheCH Number
91
30
31
24
32
25
femp , LheCR matters 3�
-
33
27
5 Mortar, Tnokal
812-4402-.i9l -90
°
safe t salti
635.se •
36
36
28
37
29
90
889.80
38
30
Totals Temp Check Number
yr _ •
:_
..
•
, r -^,,,,e• r .•?'
"d
',S,'
.
/-
1
0.. _
:y
#.
.. ,
a
.
39
40
31
°
r
41
32
Temp Check Number , 93
<'
42
.42
'.
33
c «
.
-
44
34
-c-kr Wes ap er •..
3-4404-1Te0--'0
3953 dttes
ii14F.1410
45
35
_____
-
46
36
93
00.00
48
37
_. i • + • er
.�.i
- -
,.,
49
313
$
m
39
Temp Check Number, .54 ` -
<
tx
51
52
40
53
41
54 Cakcrest kennels
01-' 020
Dec svc
-
049.00
54
42
°54 Oakcrest Kennels
01-001121
Decsvc
906,00
55
56
43
°
-zt�
Y
57
44
. '208 , n. ,, ,
, ; .
<
"s ".. s
;.
551.00.
"� r :
,
.
,. 58
45
Totals Temp Check Number
54'
»
59
46
-
61
47
Temp Check Number 53
62
63
48
-
64
49
t ' Env 2 ce co -
01-7:0i0
-
Cy. tnrU 36133,
<thru
->
7:$F$
65
50
''M* Oxygen 9erv1 ce co
r.0�1-78"12+12'+' „ <
`
cy1 3 i113'v
'
33.50 'A'4
66
51
>.:13 Oxygen Service Co
`02-003.21 " i:.,
spl ys,. ..,
+
97.33
;l
Y;
67
68
53
259
79.83
•70
54
Totals Temp Check Number
35
-
-
, 71
72
55
73
56
Temp Check Number Z6'
vb
ui
°
74
C7
- - ., a
: °
• .
h'
'
•.
75
0'
0
0
c)
O
Q
0
0'
0
0
c)
O
Q
0
03 Dec 19^-
Fri 20:47
Temp Check Number 49
Claims List
City or Mendota heights
_
Page
,
•
5
1
2
Temp.
2
3
Check - -
•
-
4
a
4
Number 'Vendor Name
,r:ccoern Code
Comments s
Nm ,un tr
5
5
-
-
6
6
49
90.00
7
8
Totals tette ec) Number
49
,
9
8
10
9
Temp Check Number 98
•
_
11
12
10
13
1150
Minnesota Torr. Inc
02-00121
splys
�29.0O
14
12
90 Minnesota Tara Inc
01-8010
spays
36.00
15
16
13
90-Mi7,rfesCr-t"a-Toro-Inc
02-0028
spays
3:00
17
14
--
;
"
-----
>
18
15
150
:.4. ell
79
20
16
totals J P.mp hec3( N7L bees
'0
21
22
17
23
1a
Temp Check Number 91
24
19-
25
20•
21
92 Minr, Telephone Installers
--
02 -1E -ale'
,•
'
installation
-
..
<
665.8124
---_-
•
26
27
28
22
' `
6.1.lee
29
23
TbGai5 Temp CheCH Number
91
30
31
24
32
25
femp , LheCR matters 3�
-
33
27
5 Mortar, Tnokal
812-4402-.i9l -90
°
safe t salti
635.se •
36
36
28
37
29
90
889.80
38
30
Totals Temp Check Number
yr _ •
:_
..
•
, r -^,,,,e• r .•?'
"d
',S,'
.
/-
1
0.. _
:y
#.
.. ,
a
.
39
40
31
°
r
41
32
Temp Check Number , 93
<'
42
.42
'.
33
c «
.
-
44
34
-c-kr Wes ap er •..
3-4404-1Te0--'0
3953 dttes
ii14F.1410
45
35
_____
-
46
36
93
00.00
48
37
_. i • + • er
.�.i
- -
,.,
49
313
$
m
39
Temp Check Number, .54 ` -
<
tx
51
52
40
53
41
54 Cakcrest kennels
01-' 020
Dec svc
-
049.00
54
42
°54 Oakcrest Kennels
01-001121
Decsvc
906,00
55
56
43
°
-zt�
Y
57
44
. '208 , n. ,, ,
, ; .
<
"s ".. s
;.
551.00.
"� r :
,
.
,. 58
45
Totals Temp Check Number
54'
»
59
46
-
61
47
Temp Check Number 53
62
63
48
-
64
49
t ' Env 2 ce co -
01-7:0i0
-
Cy. tnrU 36133,
<thru
->
7:$F$
65
50
''M* Oxygen 9erv1 ce co
r.0�1-78"12+12'+' „ <
`
cy1 3 i113'v
'
33.50 'A'4
66
51
>.:13 Oxygen Service Co
`02-003.21 " i:.,
spl ys,. ..,
+
97.33
;l
Y;
67
68
53
259
79.83
•70
54
Totals Temp Check Number
35
-
-
, 71
72
55
73
56
Temp Check Number Z6'
vb
ui
°
74
C7
- - ., a
: °
• .
h'
'
•.
75
0'
0
0
c)
O
Q
0
SO Dec 29' Claims List Page 9
Pr2 19;47 C2 ty of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 99 M6
t
2
> Temp.
Check
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
4
5
6
Number Vendor Name Account bene Commgrrit s -moun
— ------
7
96 mac.. - -
Totals Temp Check Number 96 -
-
•
9
10
11
12
tp
4(11
12
Temp Check Number .:f7
97 9 6 T Office Products 0i -e12+2 splys 3.49
13
14
16
13
)14
15
. - 5 T OfF Products 02-•^8ta i0 '50-9S 51.0E-
37 9 & T Office Products 8t✓-eetlgt splys - 37.99
37 9 i. T office Products 02-20 spl ys 14.88 -
17
18
20
16
17
18
97 S ti T Office Products th1=•E0i0 splys 11.99
--- ------
089 128.96
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
19
X20•
21
Totals r emp Check Number
- . .,
Temp Check Number : 98
22
23
24
98 Sanitary Products Co 08-24+10 splys 74.449
98 sanitary Products Co 08-0010 splys 93.39
29
30
31
32
26
27
1 1$ t
.: ; ° - " 3 07. 79 .- '
H
Totals, Temp Check Number - 98 fi
33
34
3s
36
28
z9
30
Temp Check Number 99
_ .. ,. _ a
� ~ -
38
39
40
31
32
33
�9 L £ Shaughnessy Jr - Yf1 =L�
gr'r Y ec svc .. � - � � 2 a :aat7. 12ry7 • . ..
' 59 L 9 Shaughnessy Jr ^ 0-5-sime - Dec svc ,.. 161.00 •
99 L E Shaughnessy Jr 19-2010 Dec svc ' ; 97. 341
41
42
43
44
34
35
36
59 L 9 bhaughnessy Jr 03^=901-0 -Dec svc 3-4Y.
99 L E Shaughnessy Jr •i1-eole Dec svc 293.00
99 L 9 Shaughnessy Jr 14 i! 910 Dec svc 2, ses. 60
- -
45
46,
47
48
37
38
✓r . - - _-i, . . — YC , .3.17'. v.3 F, g
99 L 9 Shaughnessy Jr , , 01-2030- reimb exp .:109.69 :, ,
-s y.
49
50
52
53
54
55�
56
40
41
42
47e52
_ 4, rel-*. c.J
Totals Temp Check Number 99 '. ,. .
43
45
Temp CheCH Number. > bt12 ... . .
.80 90 St Paul ` Bee Line .. 03-020 .. rprs ,1144/ 44 06. $rQt -s- - >
>
57
59
60
46
47
48
-- ----
t12 es. 00 _
Totals Temp Check Number 90
61
62
63'
64
49..>
0
. - .. .. :d:
Temp Check Number , 61' Y $. -
, ., , - ,. .•
62
65
66•,
57
68
69
704
7t
72
52
53
54
_ Sound ACC udt 2 cs C 3 -a- •' -pr^s 72760
--
- - - - -----
61 - 7e.00
55
X57
re.tvais- re,mp heck Number V2
n _
Temp Check Number se " « ,. .. . �^ .. ' ._ . , ,
73
75
0
0
0
0
SO Dec 29' Claims List Page 9
Pr2 19;47 C2 ty of Mendota Heights
Temp Check Number 99 M6
t
2
> Temp.
Check
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
4
5
6
Number Vendor Name Account bene Commgrrit s -moun
— ------
7
96 mac.. - -
Totals Temp Check Number 96 -
-
•
9
10
11
12
tp
4(11
12
Temp Check Number .:f7
97 9 6 T Office Products 0i -e12+2 splys 3.49
13
14
16
13
)14
15
. - 5 T OfF Products 02-•^8ta i0 '50-9S 51.0E-
37 9 & T Office Products 8t✓-eetlgt splys - 37.99
37 9 i. T office Products 02-20 spl ys 14.88 -
17
18
20
16
17
18
97 S ti T Office Products th1=•E0i0 splys 11.99
--- ------
089 128.96
21
22
24
25
26
27
28
19
X20•
21
Totals r emp Check Number
- . .,
Temp Check Number : 98
22
23
24
98 Sanitary Products Co 08-24+10 splys 74.449
98 sanitary Products Co 08-0010 splys 93.39
29
30
31
32
26
27
1 1$ t
.: ; ° - " 3 07. 79 .- '
H
Totals, Temp Check Number - 98 fi
33
34
3s
36
28
z9
30
Temp Check Number 99
_ .. ,. _ a
� ~ -
38
39
40
31
32
33
�9 L £ Shaughnessy Jr - Yf1 =L�
gr'r Y ec svc .. � - � � 2 a :aat7. 12ry7 • . ..
' 59 L 9 Shaughnessy Jr ^ 0-5-sime - Dec svc ,.. 161.00 •
99 L E Shaughnessy Jr 19-2010 Dec svc ' ; 97. 341
41
42
43
44
34
35
36
59 L 9 bhaughnessy Jr 03^=901-0 -Dec svc 3-4Y.
99 L E Shaughnessy Jr •i1-eole Dec svc 293.00
99 L 9 Shaughnessy Jr 14 i! 910 Dec svc 2, ses. 60
- -
45
46,
47
48
37
38
✓r . - - _-i, . . — YC , .3.17'. v.3 F, g
99 L 9 Shaughnessy Jr , , 01-2030- reimb exp .:109.69 :, ,
-s y.
49
50
52
53
54
55�
56
40
41
42
47e52
_ 4, rel-*. c.J
Totals Temp Check Number 99 '. ,. .
43
45
Temp CheCH Number. > bt12 ... . .
.80 90 St Paul ` Bee Line .. 03-020 .. rprs ,1144/ 44 06. $rQt -s- - >
>
57
59
60
46
47
48
-- ----
t12 es. 00 _
Totals Temp Check Number 90
61
62
63'
64
49..>
0
. - .. .. :d:
Temp Check Number , 61' Y $. -
, ., , - ,. .•
62
65
66•,
57
68
69
704
7t
72
52
53
54
_ Sound ACC udt 2 cs C 3 -a- •' -pr^s 72760
--
- - - - -----
61 - 7e.00
55
X57
re.tvais- re,mp heck Number V2
n _
Temp Check Number se " « ,. .. . �^ .. ' ._ . , ,
73
75
0
0
0
0
0
O•
0
0
..r
U
06 Dec 23-
Fri •19.4:
Temp £teck Number 6;=
Claims List
City of Mendota
Heights
,
q
_
Page
Sit
'
'
C71eck
•
'Comments
sp1ys
spays
spays
HWOUhr
-
em.58
1 .'=l
41_04
8•434
-
-
1
4
4
5
6 1
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15'
10
177
10
19
20
4
5
5
Number Vender Name
6c. Sterling Electric
Account Ode
]b -e i¢1
7
8
g
t;.. STWT7FIng L•lectric
69 Sterling Electric
---
.
01-90Y0
ed -eole
10•
11
12
a
Totals Temp Check Number
6;`
1
14
15
TIork-Niflnbe!^ b3
63 Sun Newspapers
01-�`1T�20
%
Lax prop.nutice
>
n
-
150.'00
-
•
16
17
18
--
F"'
Totals Temp Check Number
63
---•--
150.00
21
22
24
19
20
21
"Temp Check Number ° ..� a 64
.- . -
-
_ >
-
.,
ifil-evre
01-eele
01-9010
N' 11Z1
13-0028 ... ': „�.
411-90.34'+
0.! -,- 112,
01-e03O
l
>
" .,
-
^
„
..
Y'
^ '
Dec svc
Dec svc
Dec svc
3?eL^; SVC
Dec svc,
' Dec svc`
i�ec svc
Dec svc
. r ^
w
,.
,.
'.F, ,
...
,.
%
•
-
-
<.
.../17". 3L'+
346_i'8
49.9
19tl. 5H
96. f0¢,'
110_9O
3..,. 4,3
el0.4i
-------- t
•
-
.. -
^
Y•
.."
w
,
..
., >. '
, v
-
" .,
.
,' -34
25
26
27
28
29
30
az
33
35
36
37
38
39
40
22
23
24
44 U •3 Wester•-c.Uhmun3e-JW Chis
04 U 8 West Communications
54 U 8 Nest Communications
25
25
27
- b4 U :3 West LoMMuIJ catYCr115
64 U 8 West Communi cat l ons
64 U 9 West Communications'
28
29
30
b.# z1 Wr_ 1..1. eL<,uR,u/,7 cat 2 0 k
64 U 9 West Communications
--- • - -
31
32
33
'312 -
, ,Totals Temp Check Number
-•
64
r.
'.
'- - .. _.
..
•_`
'
>,
.>
}
1 s t'IJ _ Iy
*,.
41
42
43
44
34
36
36
Temp '1Ji7ecH plumber 50
68 Un1 tee Ei ectrl c Co
ea -�eole
•
spays -'
6:=. 78
45
45
47
48
3749
38
39
• _-•, 6✓ - <, •"
Totals Temp Theci4 Number
-
68 ' p:
.,
^n;'
wq%a
n $
62.79,.
�
50
51
52
40
41
42
Temp Check Number 66
it - a. ' -' •
b
'"
>
ern prem
_
w
apr
•
1
. 137. 60 •
-'.
.,
53
84
55
S6
57
59
so
61
62
G3
64
45
6"6—iF'nr,ern L1fe fns
• 66 1t`
46
47
48
1 of a 1 S i eMp I-heCH 1QUAll5Z3
Temp Check Number 67
49
o
61
..,
r. „ 67 Winthrop d Neinst3ne
67 Winthrop d• Weinstine
" - ,.�..
4ti1-L'Yt2�+.
12112010 '
2b-L�030
,.by "
�
_
-
n•
,>
.,
sk) ....
.�;'
x
.-
Nov- reLalner `'•
Noy pros �. ;,..:"
NOV NE, TorxG on •,
.. ,"
n
�..
v.
.
T
.
,
•.
-
>.
.c `
;
d„ ,;.:>
'.
` i •. ":.:.
507.40
2,[?40 75'
3'71MQ1.Oy.1
-,_,-_--
2 � 848 3 6
-
,..
..-..... -
a
..
% q'
..
^`tea. >
..
R
« .
65
66
66
69
70
72
73
74
75
52
- 53
64
' • crl nbt l nK
--
L"g12
56
457
:Fut aab Temp CII'L`k ,aum7Je1'
i 'a,
0
O•
0
0
..r
U
0
O•
0
0
..r
U
06 Dec 23-
Fri •19.4:
Temp £teck Number 6;=
Claims List
City of Mendota
Heights
,
q
_
Page
Sit
'
'
C71eck
•
'Comments
sp1ys
spays
spays
HWOUhr
-
em.58
1 .'=l
41_04
8•434
-
-
1
4
4
5
6 1
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15'
10
177
10
19
20
4
5
5
Number Vender Name
6c. Sterling Electric
Account Ode
]b -e i¢1
7
8
g
t;.. STWT7FIng L•lectric
69 Sterling Electric
---
.
01-90Y0
ed -eole
10•
11
12
a
Totals Temp Check Number
6;`
1
14
15
TIork-Niflnbe!^ b3
63 Sun Newspapers
01-�`1T�20
%
Lax prop.nutice
>
n
-
150.'00
-
•
16
17
18
--
F"'
Totals Temp Check Number
63
---•--
150.00
21
22
24
19
20
21
"Temp Check Number ° ..� a 64
.- . -
-
_ >
-
.,
ifil-evre
01-eele
01-9010
N' 11Z1
13-0028 ... ': „�.
411-90.34'+
0.! -,- 112,
01-e03O
l
>
" .,
-
^
„
..
Y'
^ '
Dec svc
Dec svc
Dec svc
3?eL^; SVC
Dec svc,
' Dec svc`
i�ec svc
Dec svc
. r ^
w
,.
,.
'.F, ,
...
,.
%
•
-
-
<.
.../17". 3L'+
346_i'8
49.9
19tl. 5H
96. f0¢,'
110_9O
3..,. 4,3
el0.4i
-------- t
•
-
.. -
^
Y•
.."
w
,
..
., >. '
, v
-
" .,
.
,' -34
25
26
27
28
29
30
az
33
35
36
37
38
39
40
22
23
24
44 U •3 Wester•-c.Uhmun3e-JW Chis
04 U 8 West Communications
54 U 8 Nest Communications
25
25
27
- b4 U :3 West LoMMuIJ catYCr115
64 U 8 West Communi cat l ons
64 U 9 West Communications'
28
29
30
b.# z1 Wr_ 1..1. eL<,uR,u/,7 cat 2 0 k
64 U 9 West Communications
--- • - -
31
32
33
'312 -
, ,Totals Temp Check Number
-•
64
r.
'.
'- - .. _.
..
•_`
'
>,
.>
}
1 s t'IJ _ Iy
*,.
41
42
43
44
34
36
36
Temp '1Ji7ecH plumber 50
68 Un1 tee Ei ectrl c Co
ea -�eole
•
spays -'
6:=. 78
45
45
47
48
3749
38
39
• _-•, 6✓ - <, •"
Totals Temp Theci4 Number
-
68 ' p:
.,
^n;'
wq%a
n $
62.79,.
�
50
51
52
40
41
42
Temp Check Number 66
it - a. ' -' •
b
'"
>
ern prem
_
w
apr
•
1
. 137. 60 •
-'.
.,
53
84
55
S6
57
59
so
61
62
G3
64
45
6"6—iF'nr,ern L1fe fns
• 66 1t`
46
47
48
1 of a 1 S i eMp I-heCH 1QUAll5Z3
Temp Check Number 67
49
o
61
..,
r. „ 67 Winthrop d Neinst3ne
67 Winthrop d• Weinstine
" - ,.�..
4ti1-L'Yt2�+.
12112010 '
2b-L�030
,.by "
�
_
-
n•
,>
.,
sk) ....
.�;'
x
.-
Nov- reLalner `'•
Noy pros �. ;,..:"
NOV NE, TorxG on •,
.. ,"
n
�..
v.
.
T
.
,
•.
-
>.
.c `
;
d„ ,;.:>
'.
` i •. ":.:.
507.40
2,[?40 75'
3'71MQ1.Oy.1
-,_,-_--
2 � 848 3 6
-
,..
..-..... -
a
..
% q'
..
^`tea. >
..
R
« .
65
66
66
69
70
72
73
74
75
52
- 53
64
' • crl nbt l nK
--
L"g12
56
457
:Fut aab Temp CII'L`k ,aum7Je1'
i 'a,
0
O•
0
0
..r
U
•
'
.2B Dec ra'
Fri 10:47
Tempi'-neok .tdumner-
0
4
C3 aims List
City of merloora Hits ‘• . ---
it t %.. ... : t .
- %.*,.., „ "
11
11Accorrfft—Coode
1
10
11
12
Temp.
/Vt1111 7'
cra ,
.
V
• or
ante
1
.
.
. . •,.. , , ,
. .
.
.
'
.
4
comment s
71,
rattottnt
164- •a9
4
5
8
o
3
.
-
MANUAL CHECKS
,
.
:
'
.
. ,
.
9
0
1
12
.
.
,
„
13
1:
16
12929 10.00
12930 2,657.26
12931 23,416.34
LMC . ‘, REgr „ •
Dakota County Bank Fire payroll w/h
Payroll a/c .
„
'
;
-
.
..
.
17
20
li
-
12932 . 4060.00
,
12934 735.75
12935. 3,442.32
Mn ealeeg Humane Soc City share
Clayton Engel pers Svcs thru 12/14/90
SCCU 12/14 payroll deductions
21
24
19
20
21
,
„
.
—22936--7-500.00
12937, 13,048.45
12938 4,243.14
Dakota County Bank , . . • .
n '''' 12/14 w/h
Commissioner of REv »» »
PERA
Payroll a/c 11/30 payroll
'22/14 payroll
Mendota Apt Ltd Part Park acq
Dak County Tras .....-"," . . "
- Dak County ' 'Abst . "-- •,„ ,
.
Larry Bridger , firearm reimb •
"
,..-
.,
— „
.
.
"
. ..
.
,
.. , ,
; • ..
„ ,
.
,
.'.
.
'
,
.
,.
;.','
'
,
,
„
, .
25
29
31
33
3;1
6
il
12939 17637.21
12940 40,993.65
12941 518,267.50
E
.
.
, -
.
„
;
12942 ' . 1,r32.50
,, 12943 • 1,260.90.
• • 12945 , .. , 350.00 ' ,,,'"
l
'
.
•
123,16 ' 289.95
12947 350.00
12948 120.00
Keith Stein. exp reimb '
Dave 07mstead • firearm reimb
• me
WA regr.
. ‘•
- 4
.
•
40
,
•
.
12949 180.000 ,
12950 253.67
'' • 12951 -,.• 7,656.78
U of It ,- ; ' " . - .
ICMA RT . , " 12114 payroll. „,
PERA • .. ..,
.
,
-
I ,4
„.
.
..
'
•
...
;
;
.
.
41
42,
43
44
34
35
36
.
A 12952 15180.00
.MWCC sac adj Centex, Solvay
:
5
40
47
48
.1
646,324.52
3
. ,
T . ,-, 717,4894-51 ,+
, -, 2. - *,'
,,,, •
....
.... .
*
-
,,
„
,
9
50
51
52
41
*
..
,
54
55
44
,
'
".....,..-
57
58
46
47„
48
.
'
.
.
.
„
,
61
62
63
64„
, 9
50
5
, '
,
'
, *
•
*
?„
.
t
,
,.,
,
„ , , ...
,
, . .
, `
„ ' 4 ,
.
'
.
'
, .
,
..
-
,
'..
,
.
.”`
•
66
66
67
68
5
53
54
.
'
*
.
.
*
,
-
69
70
71
72
55
6
7
'
r
,
,
,.
.
',...
.
.
.
-
'
.
. , 1
. „
. ;
-N, .
—
, ,
. , ,
'
. '
' .
'
, ,
74
75
•
, a
, : _ 2 • ' '
7
0
•
'
.2B Dec ra'
Fri 10:47
Tempi'-neok .tdumner-
0
4
C3 aims List
City of merloora Hits ‘• . ---
it t %.. ... : t .
- %.*,.., „ "
11
11Accorrfft—Coode
1
10
11
12
Temp.
/Vt1111 7'
cra ,
.
V
• or
ante
1
.
.
. . •,.. , , ,
. .
.
.
'
.
4
comment s
71,
rattottnt
164- •a9
4
5
8
o
3
.
-
MANUAL CHECKS
,
.
:
'
.
. ,
.
9
0
1
12
.
.
,
„
13
1:
16
12929 10.00
12930 2,657.26
12931 23,416.34
LMC . ‘, REgr „ •
Dakota County Bank Fire payroll w/h
Payroll a/c .
„
'
;
-
.
..
.
17
20
li
-
12932 . 4060.00
,
12934 735.75
12935. 3,442.32
Mn ealeeg Humane Soc City share
Clayton Engel pers Svcs thru 12/14/90
SCCU 12/14 payroll deductions
21
24
19
20
21
,
„
.
—22936--7-500.00
12937, 13,048.45
12938 4,243.14
Dakota County Bank , . . • .
n '''' 12/14 w/h
Commissioner of REv »» »
PERA
Payroll a/c 11/30 payroll
'22/14 payroll
Mendota Apt Ltd Part Park acq
Dak County Tras .....-"," . . "
- Dak County ' 'Abst . "-- •,„ ,
.
Larry Bridger , firearm reimb •
"
,..-
.,
— „
.
.
"
. ..
.
,
.. , ,
; • ..
„ ,
.
,
.'.
.
'
,
.
,.
;.','
'
,
,
„
, .
25
29
31
33
3;1
6
il
12939 17637.21
12940 40,993.65
12941 518,267.50
E
.
.
, -
.
„
;
12942 ' . 1,r32.50
,, 12943 • 1,260.90.
• • 12945 , .. , 350.00 ' ,,,'"
l
'
.
•
123,16 ' 289.95
12947 350.00
12948 120.00
Keith Stein. exp reimb '
Dave 07mstead • firearm reimb
• me
WA regr.
. ‘•
- 4
.
•
40
,
•
.
12949 180.000 ,
12950 253.67
'' • 12951 -,.• 7,656.78
U of It ,- ; ' " . - .
ICMA RT . , " 12114 payroll. „,
PERA • .. ..,
.
,
-
I ,4
„.
.
..
'
•
...
;
;
.
.
41
42,
43
44
34
35
36
.
A 12952 15180.00
.MWCC sac adj Centex, Solvay
:
5
40
47
48
.1
646,324.52
3
. ,
T . ,-, 717,4894-51 ,+
, -, 2. - *,'
,,,, •
....
.... .
*
-
,,
„
,
9
50
51
52
41
*
..
,
54
55
44
,
'
".....,..-
57
58
46
47„
48
.
'
.
.
.
„
,
61
62
63
64„
, 9
50
5
, '
,
'
, *
•
*
?„
.
t
,
,.,
,
„ , , ...
,
, . .
, `
„ ' 4 ,
.
'
.
'
, .
,
..
-
,
'..
,
.
.”`
•
66
66
67
68
5
53
54
.
'
*
.
.
*
,
-
69
70
71
72
55
6
7
'
r
,
,
,.
.
',...
.
.
.
-
'
.
. , 1
. „
. ;
-N, .
—
, ,
. , ,
'
. '
' .
'
, ,
74
75
•
, a
, : _ 2 • ' '
7
0
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation, doing
business as CENTEX HOMES, and TANDEM
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation,
Plaintiffs -Petitioners,
vs.
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation,
Defendant -Respondent.
Case Type: 10
Other Civil: Declaratory Judgment
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File No:
SUMMONS
TO: Defendant -Respondent and its Attorney.
You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' attorneys
an Answer to the Complaint which is herewith served upon you within twenty (20) days of
this Summons upon, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default
will be taken against you for relief demanded in the Complaint.
fid
Dated this .f� day of December, 1990.
• jci•L.K. i
/IL/.LJ� IL
i
By
Jo' . Fr B. i177
A tomey No. 4546
2409 Midwest Federal Building
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 224-3781
Attorneys for Plaintiffs -Petitioners
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation, doing
business as CENTEX HOMES, and TANDEM
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation,
Plaintiffs -Petitioners,
vs.
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation,
Defendant -Respondent.
Case Type: 10
Other Civil: Declaratory Judgment
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File No:
SUMMONS
TO: Defendant -Respondent and its Attorney.
You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' attorneys
an Answer to the Complaint which is herewith served upon you within twenty (20) days of
this Summons upon, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default
will be taken against you for relief demanded in the Complaint.
fid
Dated this .f� day of December, 1990.
• jci•L.K. i
/IL/.LJ� IL
i
By
Jo' . Fr B. i177
A tomey No. 4546
2409 Midwest Federal Building
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 224-3781
Attorneys for Plaintiffs -Petitioners
Case Type: 10
Other Civil: Declaratory Judgment
STALE, OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
CENTEX REAL ESTAlk, CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation, doing
business as CENTEX HOMES, and TANDEM
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation,
Plaintiffs -Petitioners,
vs.
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation,
Defendant -Respondent.
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File No:
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND
ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Plaintiffs -Petitioners, state and allege as follows:
I.
Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada corporation, doing business as Centex
Homes, (hereinafter Centex) is a foreign corporation duly authorized to do business in the
State of Minnesota.
II. •
Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter Tandem) is a domestic
corporation duly authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota.
Case Type: 10
Other Civil: Declaratory Judgment
STALE, OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
CENTEX REAL ESTAlk, CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation, doing
business as CENTEX HOMES, and TANDEM
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation,
Plaintiffs -Petitioners,
vs.
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation,
Defendant -Respondent.
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File No:
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND
ALTERNATIVE WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Plaintiffs -Petitioners, state and allege as follows:
I.
Centex Real Estate Corporation, a Nevada corporation, doing business as Centex
Homes, (hereinafter Centex) is a foreign corporation duly authorized to do business in the
State of Minnesota.
II. •
Tandem Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, (hereinafter Tandem) is a domestic
corporation duly authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota.
III.
The City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, a municipal corporation
(hereinafter City) is a municipal corporation organized and existing in accordance with
Minnesota Law.
IV.
That at all times material herein Centex Real Estate Corporation and Tandem
Corporation, (hereinafter Owners) are the fee owner of record or contract for deed vendees
of certain real property (hereinafter the subject property) consisting of approximately 89 acres
of unimproved land which is located north of Interstate 494 and south of Mendota Heights
Road and east of Dodd Road, and west of Delaware Avenue all within the City which subject
property is more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference thereto.
V.
By Application dated and filed February 8, 1990 Owners applied to the City for
approval of the following:
a. Rezoning of the subject property from R-1, R -1A, and R -1B (all one -family
residential districts) to HR PUD and MR PUD (medium density residential planned unit
development and high density residential planned unit development [hereinafter MR PUD and
HR PUD]);
b. Preliminary plat approval for Kensington Planned Unit Development, Phase II;
and
c. A wetlands permit; and
2
III.
The City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, a municipal corporation
(hereinafter City) is a municipal corporation organized and existing in accordance with
Minnesota Law.
IV.
That at all times material herein Centex Real Estate Corporation and Tandem
Corporation, (hereinafter Owners) are the fee owner of record or contract for deed vendees
of certain real property (hereinafter the subject property) consisting of approximately 89 acres
of unimproved land which is located north of Interstate 494 and south of Mendota Heights
Road and east of Dodd Road, and west of Delaware Avenue all within the City which subject
property is more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by reference thereto.
V.
By Application dated and filed February 8, 1990 Owners applied to the City for
approval of the following:
a. Rezoning of the subject property from R-1, R -1A, and R -1B (all one -family
residential districts) to HR PUD and MR PUD (medium density residential planned unit
development and high density residential planned unit development [hereinafter MR PUD and
HR PUD]);
b. Preliminary plat approval for Kensington Planned Unit Development, Phase II;
and
c. A wetlands permit; and
2
d. A Conditional Use Permit (hereinafter CUP) for a Planning Unit Development
(hereinafter PUD).
VL
The Owners' project as initially applied for consisted of 563 dwelling units, 136 dwelling
units of which were previously approved December 12, 1987 by the City's Council when it
rezoned, approved the preliminary plat and CUP for Kensington Planned Unit Development -
Phase I (hereinafter Kensington PUD Phase I). Additionally, by Resolution No. 87-120, "A
Resolution Giving Sketch Plan Approval to Case 87-24, Kensington Multi -family Residential
Planned Unit Development" Sketch Plan A which allowed for 540 units with a ten acre park
and Sketch Plan B which allowed for 500 units with a 35 acre park were approved.
VII.
The land uses surrounding the subject property are mixed and diverse. The subject
property is bounded on the south by Interstate 494, a major metropolitan transportation
corridor, on the west by the Kensington PUD - Phase I, consisting of 136 manor homes, 011
the north by Mendota Heights Road, a county state aid highway serving the City as a minor
collector -distributor between Dodd Road on the west and Delaware Avenue on the east. The
north side of Mendota Heights Road is planned for and improved with low density residential
uses. The entire subject property lies within Noise Zone 4, a Noise Attenuation District as
the same relates to the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport.
VIII.
On June 20, 1989 the City Council approved Kensington Planned Unit Development,
Phase II, (hereinafter Kensington PUD - Phase II) Sketch Plan C-3 covering 103 acres
(inclusive of Kensington PUD Phase I with a total of 563 dwelling units (of which 136 units
3
d. A Conditional Use Permit (hereinafter CUP) for a Planning Unit Development
(hereinafter PUD).
VL
The Owners' project as initially applied for consisted of 563 dwelling units, 136 dwelling
units of which were previously approved December 12, 1987 by the City's Council when it
rezoned, approved the preliminary plat and CUP for Kensington Planned Unit Development -
Phase I (hereinafter Kensington PUD Phase I). Additionally, by Resolution No. 87-120, "A
Resolution Giving Sketch Plan Approval to Case 87-24, Kensington Multi -family Residential
Planned Unit Development" Sketch Plan A which allowed for 540 units with a ten acre park
and Sketch Plan B which allowed for 500 units with a 35 acre park were approved.
VII.
The land uses surrounding the subject property are mixed and diverse. The subject
property is bounded on the south by Interstate 494, a major metropolitan transportation
corridor, on the west by the Kensington PUD - Phase I, consisting of 136 manor homes, 011
the north by Mendota Heights Road, a county state aid highway serving the City as a minor
collector -distributor between Dodd Road on the west and Delaware Avenue on the east. The
north side of Mendota Heights Road is planned for and improved with low density residential
uses. The entire subject property lies within Noise Zone 4, a Noise Attenuation District as
the same relates to the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport.
VIII.
On June 20, 1989 the City Council approved Kensington Planned Unit Development,
Phase II, (hereinafter Kensington PUD - Phase II) Sketch Plan C-3 covering 103 acres
(inclusive of Kensington PUD Phase I with a total of 563 dwelling units (of which 136 units
3
were previously approved in Kensington PUD Phase I) and providing for a dedication of
approximately 26 acres for park and recreational uses.
IX.
Prior to December, 1985, the subject property appeared in the City's Comprehensive
Guide Plan (hereinafter CGP) as guided for low density residential, rural residential and the
site for a city park. On December 6, 1985 the City applied to the Metropolitan Council for
a CGP amendment including the subject property to configure the originally guided rural
residential and low density residential to low density residential, MR -PUD (four dwelling
units per acre), HR -PUD (eight dwelling units per acre) and Limited Business -PUD.
X.
On November 19, 1987 the City Council held a public hearing on the application for
a CGP amendment and an application from Centex and Tandem for Sketch Plan approval
for the proposed Kensington PUD Multi -Housing Residential Use. The Council approved the
southeast area comprehensive plan amendments including changes made that evening and
submitted the same to the Metropolitan Council.
XL
On November 24, 1987 the City's Planning Commission considered Centex's rezoning,
subdivision and conditional use permit for a PUD (Kensington PUD - Phase I). Said
Commission recommended approval of the preliminary development plan to the City Council.
XII.
On December 15, 1987 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-120, "A Resolution
Giving Sketch Plan Approval To Case 87-24, Kensington Multi -Family Residential Planned
Unit Development." together with Rezoning Phase I from R-1 to HR -PUD, Rezoning from
4
were previously approved in Kensington PUD Phase I) and providing for a dedication of
approximately 26 acres for park and recreational uses.
IX.
Prior to December, 1985, the subject property appeared in the City's Comprehensive
Guide Plan (hereinafter CGP) as guided for low density residential, rural residential and the
site for a city park. On December 6, 1985 the City applied to the Metropolitan Council for
a CGP amendment including the subject property to configure the originally guided rural
residential and low density residential to low density residential, MR -PUD (four dwelling
units per acre), HR -PUD (eight dwelling units per acre) and Limited Business -PUD.
X.
On November 19, 1987 the City Council held a public hearing on the application for
a CGP amendment and an application from Centex and Tandem for Sketch Plan approval
for the proposed Kensington PUD Multi -Housing Residential Use. The Council approved the
southeast area comprehensive plan amendments including changes made that evening and
submitted the same to the Metropolitan Council.
XL
On November 24, 1987 the City's Planning Commission considered Centex's rezoning,
subdivision and conditional use permit for a PUD (Kensington PUD - Phase I). Said
Commission recommended approval of the preliminary development plan to the City Council.
XII.
On December 15, 1987 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-120, "A Resolution
Giving Sketch Plan Approval To Case 87-24, Kensington Multi -Family Residential Planned
Unit Development." together with Rezoning Phase I from R-1 to HR -PUD, Rezoning from
4
R-1 to MR -PUD and approving a CUP for PUD, Kensington PUD - Phase I.
XIII.
That on June 20, 1989 the City Council approved Centex's Sketch Plan C-3 for the
Kensington PUD - Phase II, which incorporates the park that was mutually agreed upon with
the Citizens' Park Review Committee.
XIV.
That subsequent to filing the Owners' application noted in Paragraph VI. above, the
matter was referred to the City's Planning Commission for public hearing February 28, 1990.
That public hearing was continued to March 27, 1990. The March 27, 1990 public hearing
was again adjourned without decision or recommendation. The public hearing was continued
to April 24, 1990.
XV.
On April 24, 1990, the public hearing before the Planning Commission continued with
neighborhood opposition being the primary preoccupation of the Commission. Finally, the
Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to deny the requested
rezoning, CUP, PUD, Preliminary Plat and Wetlands Permit based upon 14 findings of fact,
no one of which was legally sufficient or factually supported and all of which were repudiated
by the City Council May 15, 1990 when it referred the matter back to the Planning
Commission.
XVI.
On May 15, 1990 the City Council held its first public hearing on the application from
Centex for rezoning, conditional use permit for planned unit development, preliminary plat
and wetlands permits for Kensington PUD - Phase II, Plan C-3. After an extensive public
5
R-1 to MR -PUD and approving a CUP for PUD, Kensington PUD - Phase I.
XIII.
That on June 20, 1989 the City Council approved Centex's Sketch Plan C-3 for the
Kensington PUD - Phase II, which incorporates the park that was mutually agreed upon with
the Citizens' Park Review Committee.
XIV.
That subsequent to filing the Owners' application noted in Paragraph VI. above, the
matter was referred to the City's Planning Commission for public hearing February 28, 1990.
That public hearing was continued to March 27, 1990. The March 27, 1990 public hearing
was again adjourned without decision or recommendation. The public hearing was continued
to April 24, 1990.
XV.
On April 24, 1990, the public hearing before the Planning Commission continued with
neighborhood opposition being the primary preoccupation of the Commission. Finally, the
Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to deny the requested
rezoning, CUP, PUD, Preliminary Plat and Wetlands Permit based upon 14 findings of fact,
no one of which was legally sufficient or factually supported and all of which were repudiated
by the City Council May 15, 1990 when it referred the matter back to the Planning
Commission.
XVI.
On May 15, 1990 the City Council held its first public hearing on the application from
Centex for rezoning, conditional use permit for planned unit development, preliminary plat
and wetlands permits for Kensington PUD - Phase II, Plan C-3. After an extensive public
5
hearing, the City Council found that the density in the Centex proposal and the configuration
of the park were consistent with the CGP which was currently in place. The Council referred
the Centex development proposal back to the Planning Commission directing it to focus its
attention on specific planning issues not related to density.
XVII.
On May 22, 1990 the City Planning Commission accepted referral of the Centex
proposal to review specific planning issues. At the conclusion of an extensive hearing, it was
the consensus of the Planning Commission that representatives of the Planning Commission,
Centex and Tandem, the City Staff and legal counsel representing the neighbors, meet further
to discuss the issues concerning Kensington PUD - Phase II. Such a hearing was held June
4, 1990.
XVIII.
On June 26, 1990 the City's Planning Commission reviewed the plans presented by
Centex and Tandem dated June 22, 1990, reflecting changes and comments at the last
Planning Commission meeting together with the June 4, 1990 meeting. Again, after a two and
a quarter hour hearing, the Planning Commission moved that the revised plans are an
improved plan and forwarded the public record gathered during its review to the City Council.
XIX.
On July 10, 1990 the Centex and Tandem proposal came back on for hearing before
the City Council. Again after a lengthy hearing, the matter was continued to August 7, 1990
in order to resolve questions of parking and quality of craftsmanship in the proposed
development.
6
hearing, the City Council found that the density in the Centex proposal and the configuration
of the park were consistent with the CGP which was currently in place. The Council referred
the Centex development proposal back to the Planning Commission directing it to focus its
attention on specific planning issues not related to density.
XVII.
On May 22, 1990 the City Planning Commission accepted referral of the Centex
proposal to review specific planning issues. At the conclusion of an extensive hearing, it was
the consensus of the Planning Commission that representatives of the Planning Commission,
Centex and Tandem, the City Staff and legal counsel representing the neighbors, meet further
to discuss the issues concerning Kensington PUD - Phase II. Such a hearing was held June
4, 1990.
XVIII.
On June 26, 1990 the City's Planning Commission reviewed the plans presented by
Centex and Tandem dated June 22, 1990, reflecting changes and comments at the last
Planning Commission meeting together with the June 4, 1990 meeting. Again, after a two and
a quarter hour hearing, the Planning Commission moved that the revised plans are an
improved plan and forwarded the public record gathered during its review to the City Council.
XIX.
On July 10, 1990 the Centex and Tandem proposal came back on for hearing before
the City Council. Again after a lengthy hearing, the matter was continued to August 7, 1990
in order to resolve questions of parking and quality of craftsmanship in the proposed
development.
6
XX.
Throughout the hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council,
considerable neighborhood opposition manifested itself. The neighborhood opposition to the
project related generally to a variety of matters including but not limited to, traffic concerns,
quality of workmanship and materials of the proposed improvements, lack of market demand
for the project, depreciation of property values and density.
XXL
At the public hearings before the City Council and Planning Commission, Centex and
Tandem presented expert testimony that resolved all issues which affected public health,
safety and welfare, and met each and every performance standard cited by the City's staff and
consultants. The project met all of the requirements for approval by the City. Specifically,
the project as proposed is consistent with the density requirements of the City's CGP and
Zoning Ordinance and meets all of the requirements for approval of the CUP for the PUD.
XXII.
On August 7, 1990 the City Council reconvened its deliberations on the Centex and
Tandem proposals for Kensington PUD - Phase 11, Plan C-3. The two council members who
had concerns to be resolved at the previous council hearing of July 10, 1990 acknowledged
for the record that their concerns had been satisfied by Centex and Tandem. At the end of
the meeting, Councilmember Blesener moved that the area of the project be rezoned to MR -
PUD and HR -PUD consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Councilmember
Hartmann seconded the motion. Minn. Stat. *462.357, Subd. 2, provides that a City Council
may amend a zoning ordinance by a two-thirds vote of all its members. The vote was three
7
XX.
Throughout the hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council,
considerable neighborhood opposition manifested itself. The neighborhood opposition to the
project related generally to a variety of matters including but not limited to, traffic concerns,
quality of workmanship and materials of the proposed improvements, lack of market demand
for the project, depreciation of property values and density.
XXL
At the public hearings before the City Council and Planning Commission, Centex and
Tandem presented expert testimony that resolved all issues which affected public health,
safety and welfare, and met each and every performance standard cited by the City's staff and
consultants. The project met all of the requirements for approval by the City. Specifically,
the project as proposed is consistent with the density requirements of the City's CGP and
Zoning Ordinance and meets all of the requirements for approval of the CUP for the PUD.
XXII.
On August 7, 1990 the City Council reconvened its deliberations on the Centex and
Tandem proposals for Kensington PUD - Phase 11, Plan C-3. The two council members who
had concerns to be resolved at the previous council hearing of July 10, 1990 acknowledged
for the record that their concerns had been satisfied by Centex and Tandem. At the end of
the meeting, Councilmember Blesener moved that the area of the project be rezoned to MR -
PUD and HR -PUD consistent with the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Councilmember
Hartmann seconded the motion. Minn. Stat. *462.357, Subd. 2, provides that a City Council
may amend a zoning ordinance by a two-thirds vote of all its members. The vote was three
7
votes for rezoning, one vote against and the fifth councilmember passed. The Mayor
announced that the motion failed for lack of the required four-fifths affirmative vote.
XXIII.
Subsequent to that vote, Councilmember Cummins who passed admitted that when his
turn to vote came his mind told him to vote yes but his heart said no. He was undecided
and, therefore, passed. Only when the Mayor declared the motion to have failed did he
accept its result.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
DENIAL OF THE REZONING APPLICATION
WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS
XXIV.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners reallege Paragraphs I. through XXIII. as though set forth in their
entirety herein.
XXV.
This cause of action is brought pursuant to Minn. Stat. §555.01, et seq., for a
declaratory judgment seeking a determination of this court that Defendant -Respondent's
failure to grant the rezone application was arbitrary and capricious.
XXVI.
That the Defendant -Respondent failed to make any contemporaneous findings in
support of its denial of the rezone application.
XXVII.
That the failure to make contemporaneous findings shifts the burden of proof to the
Defendant -Respondent.
8
votes for rezoning, one vote against and the fifth councilmember passed. The Mayor
announced that the motion failed for lack of the required four-fifths affirmative vote.
XXIII.
Subsequent to that vote, Councilmember Cummins who passed admitted that when his
turn to vote came his mind told him to vote yes but his heart said no. He was undecided
and, therefore, passed. Only when the Mayor declared the motion to have failed did he
accept its result.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
DENIAL OF THE REZONING APPLICATION
WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS
XXIV.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners reallege Paragraphs I. through XXIII. as though set forth in their
entirety herein.
XXV.
This cause of action is brought pursuant to Minn. Stat. §555.01, et seq., for a
declaratory judgment seeking a determination of this court that Defendant -Respondent's
failure to grant the rezone application was arbitrary and capricious.
XXVI.
That the Defendant -Respondent failed to make any contemporaneous findings in
support of its denial of the rezone application.
XXVII.
That the failure to make contemporaneous findings shifts the burden of proof to the
Defendant -Respondent.
8
XXVIII.
That the reasons given by the Councilmember who voted in opposition to the rezone
application were neither legally sufficient nor factually supported in the record developed
before the City Council.
XXIX.
That the failure to set forth legally sufficient and factually supported reasons renders
the practical denial of the rezone application arbitrary and capricious without any rational
basis.
XXX.
That the denial of this rezone application has created a justiciable controversy between
the parties requiring the intervention of the Court with respect to the validity of the City's
failure to approve Plaintiffs -Petitioners' application for rezoning.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
XXXI.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners reallege Paragraphs I. through XXX. as though fully set forth
herein in their entirety.
XXXII.
This cause of action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *1983, et seq., which confers
upon any citizen the right to commence legal action against any person who, under color of
any statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom of any state, deprives the citizen of any rights,
privileges, or immunities preserved by the United States Constitution and laws. This Court
has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983.
9
XXVIII.
That the reasons given by the Councilmember who voted in opposition to the rezone
application were neither legally sufficient nor factually supported in the record developed
before the City Council.
XXIX.
That the failure to set forth legally sufficient and factually supported reasons renders
the practical denial of the rezone application arbitrary and capricious without any rational
basis.
XXX.
That the denial of this rezone application has created a justiciable controversy between
the parties requiring the intervention of the Court with respect to the validity of the City's
failure to approve Plaintiffs -Petitioners' application for rezoning.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
XXXI.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners reallege Paragraphs I. through XXX. as though fully set forth
herein in their entirety.
XXXII.
This cause of action is brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *1983, et seq., which confers
upon any citizen the right to commence legal action against any person who, under color of
any statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom of any state, deprives the citizen of any rights,
privileges, or immunities preserved by the United States Constitution and laws. This Court
has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983.
9
XXxffII.
That the Plaintiffs -Petitioners had a constitutionally protected right to a rezoning of
the subject property in a manner consistent with the law and local municipal policy.
XXxIV.
As set forth in particularity in the foregoing paragraphs, Defendant -Respondent by its
actions taken under color or pretext of state law and city ordinance, deprived the Plaintiffs -
Petitioners of their rights, privileges and immunities guaranteed by the United States
Constitution and laws, and pertinent state constitution and laws.
XXXV.
As a direct and proximate result thereof, Plaintiffs -Petitioners have suffered irreparable
harm, costs and attorneys fees in excess of $50,000.00 or as may be proven at the time of
trial.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
MANDAMUS
XXXVI.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners reallege paragraphs I through XXXV as though fully set forth
herein in their entirety.
XXXVII.
This Verified Petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus is brought pursuant to Minn.
Stat. §585.01, et seq., for an Order directing the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota, a municipal corporation, to rezone the subject property from R-1, R -1A and R -
1B (all one -family residential districts) to MR -PUD and HR -PUD (medium density residential
planned unit development and high density planned unit development, respectively).
10
XXxffII.
That the Plaintiffs -Petitioners had a constitutionally protected right to a rezoning of
the subject property in a manner consistent with the law and local municipal policy.
XXxIV.
As set forth in particularity in the foregoing paragraphs, Defendant -Respondent by its
actions taken under color or pretext of state law and city ordinance, deprived the Plaintiffs -
Petitioners of their rights, privileges and immunities guaranteed by the United States
Constitution and laws, and pertinent state constitution and laws.
XXXV.
As a direct and proximate result thereof, Plaintiffs -Petitioners have suffered irreparable
harm, costs and attorneys fees in excess of $50,000.00 or as may be proven at the time of
trial.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
MANDAMUS
XXXVI.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners reallege paragraphs I through XXXV as though fully set forth
herein in their entirety.
XXXVII.
This Verified Petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus is brought pursuant to Minn.
Stat. §585.01, et seq., for an Order directing the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County,
Minnesota, a municipal corporation, to rezone the subject property from R-1, R -1A and R -
1B (all one -family residential districts) to MR -PUD and HR -PUD (medium density residential
planned unit development and high density planned unit development, respectively).
10
XXXVIII.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, and city ordinances, the City has a legally duty to
approve those rezoning applications which comply with all applicable criteria established by
statute and ordinance.
XIL.
As set forth above, the rezoning application which is the subject of this litigation did
satisfy all criteria established by statute and ordinance. Furthermore, those reasons given by
the one councilmember who voted against the rezone application were neither legally
sufficient nor factually supported and, therefore, did not constitute a rationale basis for denial
of the rezoning application. The other councilmember who passed, gave no reasons for his
failure to vote that were either legally sufficient or factually supported and obviously lack a
rationale basis.
XL.
The failure of the City to comply with its legal duty constitutes a public wrong
specifically injurious to Plaintiffs -Petitioners herein and the general public.
XLI.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners have no plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course
of law for Defendant -Respondents failure to grant the rezoning application.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs -Petitioners pray for judgment against Defendant -Respondent
as follows:
1) Declaring and adjudging that Defendant -Respondent's failure to approve
Plaintiffs -Petitioners' application for rezoning from R-1, R -1A and R -1B to MR -PUD and
HR -PUD was unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious and without rational basis.
11
XXXVIII.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, and city ordinances, the City has a legally duty to
approve those rezoning applications which comply with all applicable criteria established by
statute and ordinance.
XIL.
As set forth above, the rezoning application which is the subject of this litigation did
satisfy all criteria established by statute and ordinance. Furthermore, those reasons given by
the one councilmember who voted against the rezone application were neither legally
sufficient nor factually supported and, therefore, did not constitute a rationale basis for denial
of the rezoning application. The other councilmember who passed, gave no reasons for his
failure to vote that were either legally sufficient or factually supported and obviously lack a
rationale basis.
XL.
The failure of the City to comply with its legal duty constitutes a public wrong
specifically injurious to Plaintiffs -Petitioners herein and the general public.
XLI.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners have no plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course
of law for Defendant -Respondents failure to grant the rezoning application.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs -Petitioners pray for judgment against Defendant -Respondent
as follows:
1) Declaring and adjudging that Defendant -Respondent's failure to approve
Plaintiffs -Petitioners' application for rezoning from R-1, R -1A and R -1B to MR -PUD and
HR -PUD was unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious and without rational basis.
11
2) That a writ of mandamus issue compelling Defendant -Respondent to approve
Plaintiffs -Petitioners' application for rezoning from R-1, R -1A and R -1B to MR -PUD and
HR -PUD.
3) Awarding Plaintiffs -Petitioners' damages against Defendant -Respondent in excess
of $50,000.00 or as may be proven at the time of trial.
4) Awarding Plaintiffs -Petitioners' their costs and disbursements herein including
reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, et seq.
5) For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
Dated this 26th day of December, 1990.
BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A.
Banco
ttorney No. 4546
9 Midwest Federa uilding
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 224-3781
Attorneys for Plaintiffs -Petitioners
ACKNOWLEDGMENT REQUIRED BY
MINN. STAT. *549.21, SUBD. 2
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.21, Subd. 2,
costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded to the opposing
party or parties in this litigation if the Court should find that the undersigned acted in bad
faith, asserted a claim or defense that is frivolous and that is costly to the other party,
asserted an unfounded position solely to delay the ordinary course of the proceedings or to
harass or committed a fraud upon the Cou
,.741,AVA04-
ohn F. Banmgan,
12
2) That a writ of mandamus issue compelling Defendant -Respondent to approve
Plaintiffs -Petitioners' application for rezoning from R-1, R -1A and R -1B to MR -PUD and
HR -PUD.
3) Awarding Plaintiffs -Petitioners' damages against Defendant -Respondent in excess
of $50,000.00 or as may be proven at the time of trial.
4) Awarding Plaintiffs -Petitioners' their costs and disbursements herein including
reasonable attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983, et seq.
5) For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable.
Dated this 26th day of December, 1990.
BANNIGAN & KELLY, P.A.
Banco
ttorney No. 4546
9 Midwest Federa uilding
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 224-3781
Attorneys for Plaintiffs -Petitioners
ACKNOWLEDGMENT REQUIRED BY
MINN. STAT. *549.21, SUBD. 2
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.21, Subd. 2,
costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded to the opposing
party or parties in this litigation if the Court should find that the undersigned acted in bad
faith, asserted a claim or defense that is frivolous and that is costly to the other party,
asserted an unfounded position solely to delay the ordinary course of the proceedings or to
harass or committed a fraud upon the Cou
,.741,AVA04-
ohn F. Banmgan,
12
VERIFICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COMITY OF RAMSEY )
Thomas M. Boyce, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says that he is the
President of the Minnesota division of Plaintiff -Petitioner, Centex, in the above -entitled action;
and that be has read the foregoing Verified Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Alternative
Writ of Mandamus, and Other Matters and that the same is true of his own knowledge,
except as to the matters therein stated on information and belief and as to such matters, he
believes them to be true,
Subscribed and sworn to before me r.
this a7 day ofe_Q 6 ff 1990.
STATE OF MThIlsTESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
) ss
MAFIY JANE WEBER
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
ywmmaMlexpires
Richard A. Putnam, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says that he is the
President of Plaintiff -Petitioner, Tandem Corporation, in the above -entitled action; and that
he has read the foregoing Verified Complaint for Declaratory Tudgment, Alternative Writ of
Mandamus, and Other Matters and that the same is true of his own knowledge, except as to
the matters therein stated an information and belief and as to such matters, he believes them
to be true,
Subscribed and swojn to before me
Pfri {ger , 1990,
this 7.day of
13
NOTARY PUBLIC - MIE NNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My commtaeton owcp1roo 0130/93
VERIFICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss
COMITY OF RAMSEY )
Thomas M. Boyce, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says that he is the
President of the Minnesota division of Plaintiff -Petitioner, Centex, in the above -entitled action;
and that be has read the foregoing Verified Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Alternative
Writ of Mandamus, and Other Matters and that the same is true of his own knowledge,
except as to the matters therein stated on information and belief and as to such matters, he
believes them to be true,
Subscribed and sworn to before me r.
this a7 day ofe_Q 6 ff 1990.
STATE OF MThIlsTESOTA
COUNTY OF RAMSEY
) ss
MAFIY JANE WEBER
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
ywmmaMlexpires
Richard A. Putnam, being first duly sworn, upon oath, deposes and says that he is the
President of Plaintiff -Petitioner, Tandem Corporation, in the above -entitled action; and that
he has read the foregoing Verified Complaint for Declaratory Tudgment, Alternative Writ of
Mandamus, and Other Matters and that the same is true of his own knowledge, except as to
the matters therein stated an information and belief and as to such matters, he believes them
to be true,
Subscribed and swojn to before me
Pfri {ger , 1990,
this 7.day of
13
NOTARY PUBLIC - MIE NNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My commtaeton owcp1roo 0130/93
0
SATHRE BERGQUIST, INC.
co
150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN 55391
(612) 476-6000 FAX 476-0104
March 5, 1989
KENSINGTON PARK
CENTEX - MENDOTA HEIGHTS
That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 28 North,
Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter; thence
North 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds Nest, bearing assumed, along the
east line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 721.62 feet to a
point on a line parallel with and 103.40 feet southerly of, as measured
perpendicular to the north line of the south 50 rods of the South Halt'
of said Southeast Quarter and the point of beginning of the land to be
described; thence North 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West,
continuing along said east line of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of
451.79 feet; thence South 84 degrees 52 minutes 58 seconds West, a
distance of 364.29 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 362.95
feet westerly of, as measured perpendicular to, said east line of the
Southeast Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West,
along said parallel line, a distance of 287.00 feet; thence North 80
degrees 49 minutes 39 seconds East, a distance 367.44 feet to said east
line of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 00 -degrees 12 minutes 37
seconds West, along said east line of the Southeast Quarter, distance of
327.49 feet to the north line of the South 30 rods of the North Half of
said Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 22 minutes 52 seconds
West, along said north line of the South 30 rods, a distance of 1611.37
feet; thence South 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds Ft, parallel with
said east line of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 988.46 feet to
said north line of the South 50 rods of the South Half of said Southeast
Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds Pact, along said
north line of the South 50 rods, a distance of 138.51 feet; thence South
20 degrees 16 minutes 08 seconds East, a distance of 109.80 feet to a
line parallel with and 103.40 feet southerly of, as measured
perpendicular to, said north line of the South 50 rods; thence north 89
degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds East, along said parallel line, a distance
of 1435.19 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to easements,
restrictions, and reservations of record, if any. EXCEPT that part
embraced within the plat of HAMPSHIRE ESTATES, according to the recorded
plat thereof.
Outlot A, HAMPSHIRE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof.
Exhibit "A"
Page. 1
0
SATHRE BERGQUIST, INC.
co
150 SOUTH BROADWAY WAYZATA, MN 55391
(612) 476-6000 FAX 476-0104
March 5, 1989
KENSINGTON PARK
CENTEX - MENDOTA HEIGHTS
That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 28 North,
Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Southeast Quarter; thence
North 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds Nest, bearing assumed, along the
east line of said Southeast Quarter, a distance of 721.62 feet to a
point on a line parallel with and 103.40 feet southerly of, as measured
perpendicular to the north line of the south 50 rods of the South Halt'
of said Southeast Quarter and the point of beginning of the land to be
described; thence North 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West,
continuing along said east line of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of
451.79 feet; thence South 84 degrees 52 minutes 58 seconds West, a
distance of 364.29 feet to a point on a line parallel with and 362.95
feet westerly of, as measured perpendicular to, said east line of the
Southeast Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West,
along said parallel line, a distance of 287.00 feet; thence North 80
degrees 49 minutes 39 seconds East, a distance 367.44 feet to said east
line of the Southeast Quarter; thence North 00 -degrees 12 minutes 37
seconds West, along said east line of the Southeast Quarter, distance of
327.49 feet to the north line of the South 30 rods of the North Half of
said Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 22 minutes 52 seconds
West, along said north line of the South 30 rods, a distance of 1611.37
feet; thence South 00 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds Ft, parallel with
said east line of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 988.46 feet to
said north line of the South 50 rods of the South Half of said Southeast
Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds Pact, along said
north line of the South 50 rods, a distance of 138.51 feet; thence South
20 degrees 16 minutes 08 seconds East, a distance of 109.80 feet to a
line parallel with and 103.40 feet southerly of, as measured
perpendicular to, said north line of the South 50 rods; thence north 89
degrees 24 minutes 31 seconds East, along said parallel line, a distance
of 1435.19 feet to the point of beginning. Subject to easements,
restrictions, and reservations of record, if any. EXCEPT that part
embraced within the plat of HAMPSHIRE ESTATES, according to the recorded
plat thereof.
Outlot A, HAMPSHIRE ESTATES, according to the recorded plat thereof.
Exhibit "A"
Page. 1
That part of the South 1815.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section
36, Township 28, Range 23 which lies westerly and southwesterly of a
line described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said
Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 06 seconds West,
assumed basis for bearings, 1097.00 feet along the south line of said
Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 35 minutes 54 seconds West
395.50 feet; thence North 74 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds, West 252.00
feet; thence North 20 degrees 14 minutes 55 seconds West 383.28 feet to
the north line of the South 825.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter;
thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 06 seconds West 130.07 feet along
said north line to the east line of the West '1032.56 feet of said
Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 27 minutes 53 seconds West
990.00 feet along said east line to the north line of the South 1815.00
feet of said Southeast Quarter and said line there terminating. EXCEPT
that part of said 1815.00 feet which lies within the right-of-way of
Interstate Highway No. 494 as established by MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-57, on file or record in the
office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
That part of the "East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36,
Township 28, Range 23, which lies easterly of the plat of KENSINGTON
P.U.D. according to the recorded plat thereof and which lies southerly
of the westerly extension of a line drawn 40.00 feet south of and -
parallel with the north line of the South 1815.00 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of said Section 36. EXL;h11 that part of the East Half of the
Southwest Quarter as shown on MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-56, on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Paste 2
That part of the South 1815.00 feet of the Southeast Quarter of Section
36, Township 28, Range 23 which lies westerly and southwesterly of a
line described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said
Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 06 seconds West,
assumed basis for bearings, 1097.00 feet along the south line of said
Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 35 minutes 54 seconds West
395.50 feet; thence North 74 degrees 48 minutes 54 seconds, West 252.00
feet; thence North 20 degrees 14 minutes 55 seconds West 383.28 feet to
the north line of the South 825.00 feet of said Southeast Quarter;
thence South 89 degrees 24 minutes 06 seconds West 130.07 feet along
said north line to the east line of the West '1032.56 feet of said
Southeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 27 minutes 53 seconds West
990.00 feet along said east line to the north line of the South 1815.00
feet of said Southeast Quarter and said line there terminating. EXCEPT
that part of said 1815.00 feet which lies within the right-of-way of
Interstate Highway No. 494 as established by MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-57, on file or record in the
office of the County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
That part of the "East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 36,
Township 28, Range 23, which lies easterly of the plat of KENSINGTON
P.U.D. according to the recorded plat thereof and which lies southerly
of the westerly extension of a line drawn 40.00 feet south of and -
parallel with the north line of the South 1815.00 feet of the Southeast
Quarter of said Section 36. EXL;h11 that part of the East Half of the
Southwest Quarter as shown on MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-56, on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota.
Paste 2
Case Type: 10
Other Civil: Declaratory Judgment
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation, doing
business as CENTEX HOMES, and TANDEM
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation,
Plaintiffs -Petitioners,
vs.
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File No:
INTERROGATORIES TO. DEFENDANT -RESPONDENT
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation,
Defendant -Respondent.
TO: Defendant -Respondent and its Attorney.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners above named demand that Defendant -Respondent answer the
following interrogatories, under oath, pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District
Courts of the State of Minnesota, within the time limits set forth therein.
DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
Certain words used in these interrogatories have the meaning ascribed to them below,
namely:
1) 'Documents" shall have the meaning set forth in Rule 34.01 of the Minnesota
Rules of Civil Procedure (MRCP), and which now are or ever were in the possession, custody
or control of Defendant -Respondent.
Case Type: 10
Other Civil: Declaratory Judgment
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF DAKOTA
CENTEX REAL ESTATE CORPORATION,
a Nevada corporation, doing
business as CENTEX HOMES, and TANDEM
CORPORATION, a Minnesota corporation,
Plaintiffs -Petitioners,
vs.
DISTRICT COURT
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File No:
INTERROGATORIES TO. DEFENDANT -RESPONDENT
THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS,
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA, a
municipal corporation,
Defendant -Respondent.
TO: Defendant -Respondent and its Attorney.
Plaintiffs -Petitioners above named demand that Defendant -Respondent answer the
following interrogatories, under oath, pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District
Courts of the State of Minnesota, within the time limits set forth therein.
DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
Certain words used in these interrogatories have the meaning ascribed to them below,
namely:
1) 'Documents" shall have the meaning set forth in Rule 34.01 of the Minnesota
Rules of Civil Procedure (MRCP), and which now are or ever were in the possession, custody
or control of Defendant -Respondent.
2) "Identify" means, with respect to a natural person, to set forth that person's full
name and, on the first occasion that such person is identified, the following information:
a. Present or last known residence address;
b. Present or last known business address;
c. Present or last known employer; and
d. Present or last known job title.
3) "Identify" means, with respect to any entity other than a natural person, to set
forth the full name or title of the entity and, on the first occasion that such entity is
identified, to state the address and principal business or activity of such entity.
4) "Identify" means (regardless of whether any claim of privilege is asserted), with
respect to a document, to set forth the following information, subject to the option to produce
business records as provided by Rule 33.03 of MRCP:
a. Its nature (e.g., letter, memoranda, report, etc.);
b. The date it bears or, if undated, the date it was written or created;
c. The identity of the person(s) who received it;
d. Its file number or any identifying mark or code;
e. Its general subject matter;
f. Its present or last known location and custodian;
g. In all cases where Defendant -Respondent opts to specify documents under Rule
33.03, it may supply fully legible copies of such documents in lieu of such specification. This
permission, however, shall in no way prejudice Plaintiffs -Petitioners' right to request production
of all documents pursuant to Rule 34 MRCP. If any document was, but no longer is, in
Defendant -Respondent's possession, custody, or control, state whether it has been lost, missing,
2
2) "Identify" means, with respect to a natural person, to set forth that person's full
name and, on the first occasion that such person is identified, the following information:
a. Present or last known residence address;
b. Present or last known business address;
c. Present or last known employer; and
d. Present or last known job title.
3) "Identify" means, with respect to any entity other than a natural person, to set
forth the full name or title of the entity and, on the first occasion that such entity is
identified, to state the address and principal business or activity of such entity.
4) "Identify" means (regardless of whether any claim of privilege is asserted), with
respect to a document, to set forth the following information, subject to the option to produce
business records as provided by Rule 33.03 of MRCP:
a. Its nature (e.g., letter, memoranda, report, etc.);
b. The date it bears or, if undated, the date it was written or created;
c. The identity of the person(s) who received it;
d. Its file number or any identifying mark or code;
e. Its general subject matter;
f. Its present or last known location and custodian;
g. In all cases where Defendant -Respondent opts to specify documents under Rule
33.03, it may supply fully legible copies of such documents in lieu of such specification. This
permission, however, shall in no way prejudice Plaintiffs -Petitioners' right to request production
of all documents pursuant to Rule 34 MRCP. If any document was, but no longer is, in
Defendant -Respondent's possession, custody, or control, state whether it has been lost, missing,
2
destroyed, transferred or otherwise disposed of; and in each instance, explain the circumstances
surrounding the disposition thereof and the date it occurred.
5) "Identify" means, with respect to an oral communication or other event, to set
forth the following information:
a. Its substance;
b. The date it occurred and the time;
c. The place it occurred and, if different, (as with a telephone communication), the
place it was received;
d. For a communication, the identity of each originator and recipient; For an event,
the identity of each participant; and
e. The identity of all persons present when the communication or event occurred.
6) "Identify" means with respect to an oral agreement, to set forth the following
information:
a. The date the agreement was entered into;
b. The place the agreement was entered into; and if the agreement was made over
the telephone, the place the call was made from and the place it was received;
c. The identity of all persons present when the agreement was made; and
d. The terms of the agreement.
7) Objections shall state with particularity the grounds for the objection and may
be served as part of the document containing the answers or separately within the time limit
set forth in MRCP. In the event a claim of privilege is asserted to an interrogatory, you are
instructed to identify each document in which a privilege is asserted pursuant to No. 4 above;
r
and with respect to each oral communication you are instructed to identify the following
3
destroyed, transferred or otherwise disposed of; and in each instance, explain the circumstances
surrounding the disposition thereof and the date it occurred.
5) "Identify" means, with respect to an oral communication or other event, to set
forth the following information:
a. Its substance;
b. The date it occurred and the time;
c. The place it occurred and, if different, (as with a telephone communication), the
place it was received;
d. For a communication, the identity of each originator and recipient; For an event,
the identity of each participant; and
e. The identity of all persons present when the communication or event occurred.
6) "Identify" means with respect to an oral agreement, to set forth the following
information:
a. The date the agreement was entered into;
b. The place the agreement was entered into; and if the agreement was made over
the telephone, the place the call was made from and the place it was received;
c. The identity of all persons present when the agreement was made; and
d. The terms of the agreement.
7) Objections shall state with particularity the grounds for the objection and may
be served as part of the document containing the answers or separately within the time limit
set forth in MRCP. In the event a claim of privilege is asserted to an interrogatory, you are
instructed to identify each document in which a privilege is asserted pursuant to No. 4 above;
r
and with respect to each oral communication you are instructed to identify the following
3
information:
a. The general subject of the conversation without disclosing the alleged privileged
communication;
b. The date it occurred and the time;
c. The place it occurred;
d. The identity of each originator and recipient; for an event, the identity of each
participant; and
e. The identity of all persons present when the communication or event occurred.
INTERROGATORIES
1. Identify all persons who prepared or assisted in the preparation of the answers
to these interrogatories, stating with particularity the answers which each person prepared,
answered or assisted in answering.
2. Identify each expert witness who this answering Defendant-Respondent plans to
offer as a witness in the above-entitled proceedings.
3. Specify in detail the professional qualifications of each person identified in
answer to Interrogatory No. 2.
4. Disclose the subject matter on which each expert witness identified in your
answer to Interrogatory No. 2 is expected to testify.
5. State the substance of the facts and opinions to which each person identified
in your answer to Interrogatory No. 2 is expected to testify.
6. Provide a summary of the grounds for each opinion which each expert witness
identified in your answer to Interrogatory No. 2 is expected to testify.
4
information:
a. The general subject of the conversation without disclosing the alleged privileged
communication;
b. The date it occurred and the time;
c. The place it occurred;
d. The identity of each originator and recipient; for an event, the identity of each
participant; and
e. The identity of all persons present when the communication or event occurred.
INTERROGATORIES
1. Identify all persons who prepared or assisted in the preparation of the answers
to these interrogatories, stating with particularity the answers which each person prepared,
answered or assisted in answering.
2. Identify each expert witness who this answering Defendant-Respondent plans to
offer as a witness in the above-entitled proceedings.
3. Specify in detail the professional qualifications of each person identified in
answer to Interrogatory No. 2.
4. Disclose the subject matter on which each expert witness identified in your
answer to Interrogatory No. 2 is expected to testify.
5. State the substance of the facts and opinions to which each person identified
in your answer to Interrogatory No. 2 is expected to testify.
6. Provide a summary of the grounds for each opinion which each expert witness
identified in your answer to Interrogatory No. 2 is expected to testify.
4
IsS
7. Identify all documents, data and information, whether consistent or inconsistent
with the opinions given in response to the above interrogatory, which were considered by each
expert witness identified in your answer to Interrogatory No. 2 in rendering his/her opinion.
8. Identify each person or expert witness consulted by you or your attorneys whom
you do not anticipate you will call as a witness in these proceedings.
9. Identify each and every other person known to Defendant -Respondent who may
be called by said Defendant -Respondent as a witness on behalf of Defendant -Respondent in
the trial hereof.
10. Identify each document Defendant -Respondent may offer into evidence at the
trial hereof.
11. State whether council person Carl W. Cummins, III, gave any reasons "on the
record" prior to adjournment of the August 7, 1990, city council meeting explaining his failure
to vote on Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' rezoning application.
12. If Interrogatory No. 11 is answered in the affirmative, state the reasons given
by Councilperson Cummins.
13. ' State whether Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal met all Defendant -Respondent's
PUD requirements.
14. If Interrogatory No. 13 is answered in the negative, identify with specificity each
and every instance where Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal failed to meet Defendant -
Respondent's PUD requirements.
15. State whether Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal was consistent with Defendant -
Respondent's comprehensive land use plan pertaining to the subject property.
5
IsS
7. Identify all documents, data and information, whether consistent or inconsistent
with the opinions given in response to the above interrogatory, which were considered by each
expert witness identified in your answer to Interrogatory No. 2 in rendering his/her opinion.
8. Identify each person or expert witness consulted by you or your attorneys whom
you do not anticipate you will call as a witness in these proceedings.
9. Identify each and every other person known to Defendant -Respondent who may
be called by said Defendant -Respondent as a witness on behalf of Defendant -Respondent in
the trial hereof.
10. Identify each document Defendant -Respondent may offer into evidence at the
trial hereof.
11. State whether council person Carl W. Cummins, III, gave any reasons "on the
record" prior to adjournment of the August 7, 1990, city council meeting explaining his failure
to vote on Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' rezoning application.
12. If Interrogatory No. 11 is answered in the affirmative, state the reasons given
by Councilperson Cummins.
13. ' State whether Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal met all Defendant -Respondent's
PUD requirements.
14. If Interrogatory No. 13 is answered in the negative, identify with specificity each
and every instance where Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal failed to meet Defendant -
Respondent's PUD requirements.
15. State whether Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal was consistent with Defendant -
Respondent's comprehensive land use plan pertaining to the subject property.
5
16. If Interrogatory No. 15 is answered in the negative, identify with specificity each
element of inconsistency, citing specific passages Defendant -Respondent's comprehensive land
use plan as the basis therefor.
17. State whether Defendant -Respondent contends that Plaintiffs -Petitioners have
failed to exhaust all their remedies before Defendant -Respondent as envisioned in Minn. Stat.
§462.361, subd. 2 thereof, as amended.
18. If Interrogatory No. 17 is answered in the affirmative, identify with specificity
the remedies available to Plaintiffs -Petitioners which they have yet to exhaust, citing statutory
and/or ordinance authority therefor.
19. State with specificity the rational basis for Defendant -Respondent's failure to
approve Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal.
20. Identify the factual basis "in the record" supporting Defendant -Respondent's
failure to approve Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal.
21. State whether Defendant -Respondent intends to go beyond "the record" in order
to supplement and/or provide a rational and/or factual basis for its failure to approve
Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal.
Dated thisG day of December, 1990.
BANNIGAN &j LAY, P.A.
/,moi'•!
n F. Banni_a'!J'.
torney No. 4546
409 Midwest Federal Building
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 224-3781
Attorneys for Plaintiffs -Petitioners
6
16. If Interrogatory No. 15 is answered in the negative, identify with specificity each
element of inconsistency, citing specific passages Defendant -Respondent's comprehensive land
use plan as the basis therefor.
17. State whether Defendant -Respondent contends that Plaintiffs -Petitioners have
failed to exhaust all their remedies before Defendant -Respondent as envisioned in Minn. Stat.
§462.361, subd. 2 thereof, as amended.
18. If Interrogatory No. 17 is answered in the affirmative, identify with specificity
the remedies available to Plaintiffs -Petitioners which they have yet to exhaust, citing statutory
and/or ordinance authority therefor.
19. State with specificity the rational basis for Defendant -Respondent's failure to
approve Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal.
20. Identify the factual basis "in the record" supporting Defendant -Respondent's
failure to approve Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal.
21. State whether Defendant -Respondent intends to go beyond "the record" in order
to supplement and/or provide a rational and/or factual basis for its failure to approve
Plaintiffs' -Petitioners' proposal.
Dated thisG day of December, 1990.
BANNIGAN &j LAY, P.A.
/,moi'•!
n F. Banni_a'!J'.
torney No. 4546
409 Midwest Federal Building
50 E. 5th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
(612) 224-3781
Attorneys for Plaintiffs -Petitioners
6
ACKNOWLEDGMENT REQUIRED BY
MINN. STAT. §549.21, SUBD. 2
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.21, Subd. 2,
costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded to the opposing
party or parties in this litigation if the Court should find that the undersigned acted in bad
faith, asserted a claim or defense that is frivolous and that is costly to the other party,
asserted an unfounded position solely to delay the ordinary course of the proceedings or to
harass or committed a fraud upon the Court.
7
ACKNOWLEDGMENT REQUIRED BY
MINN. STAT. §549.21, SUBD. 2
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that pursuant to Minn. Stat. §549.21, Subd. 2,
costs, disbursements and reasonable attorney and witness fees may be awarded to the opposing
party or parties in this litigation if the Court should find that the undersigned acted in bad
faith, asserted a claim or defense that is frivolous and that is costly to the other party,
asserted an unfounded position solely to delay the ordinary course of the proceedings or to
harass or committed a fraud upon the Court.
7
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMDBANUM
28 December, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Co}incil
City Admini
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Donation to Police Department
INTRODUCTIOIQ
The Police Department recently accepted the donation of a video camera
and accessories from the Aetna Insurance Company and Mothers Against
Drunken Driving. The primary purpose of the gift is to enhance our
efforts in DUI enforcement. The camera will be mounted in a primary
squad and used to record the activities of suspected drunk drivers from
the point of initial contact to arrest.
JISTORY
Aetna Insurance started their "Eye on DWI" program in 1988 when they
donated video equipment to the Houston, Texas Police Department. They
have since crossed the country and have invested over $1,000,000 in
providing similar equipment to departments that were nominated by MADD
chapters. We were nominated because of our close relationship with the
Minnesota, Tri -County and Dakota County chapters of MADD, and because of
our vigorous record of DWI enforcement (12 arrests in 1988, 51 in 1989,
and 118 in 1990).
DISCUSSION
The attached materials will partially explain the program and I have a
90 second video Public Service Announcement that will show the cameras
in operation. The camera equipment also provides the benefit of
flexibility and can be used to document other arrests and crime scenes
and will serve as an excellent training tool for the officers.
JECOMMENDATION
That council acknowledge the generosity of Aetna and MADD in making this
valuable equipment available to our Department.
Mendota Heights Police Department
MEMDBANUM
28 December, 1990
TO: Mayor and City Co}incil
City Admini
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Donation to Police Department
INTRODUCTIOIQ
The Police Department recently accepted the donation of a video camera
and accessories from the Aetna Insurance Company and Mothers Against
Drunken Driving. The primary purpose of the gift is to enhance our
efforts in DUI enforcement. The camera will be mounted in a primary
squad and used to record the activities of suspected drunk drivers from
the point of initial contact to arrest.
JISTORY
Aetna Insurance started their "Eye on DWI" program in 1988 when they
donated video equipment to the Houston, Texas Police Department. They
have since crossed the country and have invested over $1,000,000 in
providing similar equipment to departments that were nominated by MADD
chapters. We were nominated because of our close relationship with the
Minnesota, Tri -County and Dakota County chapters of MADD, and because of
our vigorous record of DWI enforcement (12 arrests in 1988, 51 in 1989,
and 118 in 1990).
DISCUSSION
The attached materials will partially explain the program and I have a
90 second video Public Service Announcement that will show the cameras
in operation. The camera equipment also provides the benefit of
flexibility and can be used to document other arrests and crime scenes
and will serve as an excellent training tool for the officers.
JECOMMENDATION
That council acknowledge the generosity of Aetna and MADD in making this
valuable equipment available to our Department.
/Etna
•
MADD
Mothers Against Drunk Driving
News Release
Contact:
Linda Ambrose at Aetna
(203) 273 - 3388 (office)
(203) 724 - 0585 (home)
Joel Mondshane at MADD
649-0370 (office)
Aetna and MADD
Help Twin City Law Enforcement Agencies
Focus Their "Eye on DWI"
Minneapolis, MN, December 18, 1990 -- Aetna Life & Casualty
and MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) Minnesota
chapter, have joined forces with law enforcement agencies
in the Twin Cities in a new program to crack down on drunk
drivers.
Through a program called "Aetna's Eye on DWI," the
insurer has funded MADD's purchase of twelve Panasonic
video cameras for the Minnesota State Highway Patrol; four
cameras for the Minneapolis Police Department; and four
cameras for suburban law enforcement agencies in the Twin
Cities area. The cameras will be used over the holiday
-more-
/Etna
•
MADD
Mothers Against Drunk Driving
News Release
Contact:
Linda Ambrose at Aetna
(203) 273 - 3388 (office)
(203) 724 - 0585 (home)
Joel Mondshane at MADD
649-0370 (office)
Aetna and MADD
Help Twin City Law Enforcement Agencies
Focus Their "Eye on DWI"
Minneapolis, MN, December 18, 1990 -- Aetna Life & Casualty
and MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) Minnesota
chapter, have joined forces with law enforcement agencies
in the Twin Cities in a new program to crack down on drunk
drivers.
Through a program called "Aetna's Eye on DWI," the
insurer has funded MADD's purchase of twelve Panasonic
video cameras for the Minnesota State Highway Patrol; four
cameras for the Minneapolis Police Department; and four
cameras for suburban law enforcement agencies in the Twin
Cities area. The cameras will be used over the holiday
-more-
Aetna/MADD 2-2-2
season and beyond by law enforcement officers to record on -
and off -the -road encounters with drivers suspected of being
under the influence of alcohol and other drugs.
"In 1989, there were 6,877 alcohol-related injuries and
275 alcohol-related deaths in Minnesota," said Jeff Jensen,
president of Hennepin County MADD.
"I can't think of a better time of year to redouble our
efforts to rid society of this problem than over this
holiday season, when so many people choose to celebrate
with alcohol and then drive."
Don Erwin, General Manager of Aetna's Personal Financial
Security Division in Minnesota, said, "Every Minnesota
citizen pays a high price for drunk drivers. That price is
human tragedy, crashes and higher insurance costs."
He continued, "We're investing in the 'Aetna's Eye on
DWI' program because we believe it will help bolster police
efforts to get impaired drivers off the road."
Breath or blood testing is the predominant method used to
- more -
Aetna/MADD 2-2-2
season and beyond by law enforcement officers to record on -
and off -the -road encounters with drivers suspected of being
under the influence of alcohol and other drugs.
"In 1989, there were 6,877 alcohol-related injuries and
275 alcohol-related deaths in Minnesota," said Jeff Jensen,
president of Hennepin County MADD.
"I can't think of a better time of year to redouble our
efforts to rid society of this problem than over this
holiday season, when so many people choose to celebrate
with alcohol and then drive."
Don Erwin, General Manager of Aetna's Personal Financial
Security Division in Minnesota, said, "Every Minnesota
citizen pays a high price for drunk drivers. That price is
human tragedy, crashes and higher insurance costs."
He continued, "We're investing in the 'Aetna's Eye on
DWI' program because we believe it will help bolster police
efforts to get impaired drivers off the road."
Breath or blood testing is the predominant method used to
- more -
Aetna/MADD 3-3-3
determine whether a person's blood alcohol content exceeds
the legal limit. However, police increasingly are relying
on new forms of evidence to show the "impairment of one's
normal mental and physical faculties" required by law for
conviction in DWI cases.
Jensen explained, "Video cameras will provide critical
evidence needed to convict drunk drivers. We also expect
this new form of evidence to help reduce the backlog of
court cases."
Every year in America drunk drivers cause more than
23,000 deaths, 43,000 serious injuries and an estimated $16
billion in overall economic losses.
"It's time to end this carnage," said Aetna's Erwin.
"We're confident that 'Aetna's Eye on DWI' and the
dedication of MADD Minnesota, the Minneapolis Police
Department and Minnesota State Highway Patrol will help
eliminate the scourge of the drunk driver," concluded
Aetna's Erwin.
-30-
Aetna/MADD 3-3-3
determine whether a person's blood alcohol content exceeds
the legal limit. However, police increasingly are relying
on new forms of evidence to show the "impairment of one's
normal mental and physical faculties" required by law for
conviction in DWI cases.
Jensen explained, "Video cameras will provide critical
evidence needed to convict drunk drivers. We also expect
this new form of evidence to help reduce the backlog of
court cases."
Every year in America drunk drivers cause more than
23,000 deaths, 43,000 serious injuries and an estimated $16
billion in overall economic losses.
"It's time to end this carnage," said Aetna's Erwin.
"We're confident that 'Aetna's Eye on DWI' and the
dedication of MADD Minnesota, the Minneapolis Police
Department and Minnesota State Highway Patrol will help
eliminate the scourge of the drunk driver," concluded
Aetna's Erwin.
-30-
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Designation of Health Officer for 1991
December 27, 1990
DISCUSSION
a
Dr. Thaddeus Chao has once again o€ered to serve, without
compensation, as the City's Health Officer for 199 .
�. ngo; na d i es --as the--C=ty'-s—Hea-1 Lh Off.icer—are--min i ,l7 rr
r
��,,,,L,_.�,a,,,".�n��9�-0—B�—Ghao--ad�tt-rrl-i-s't-e-re� T-�-�=r�r�oe�a�ica�•s--to
a171--i-nterested—publ ii fet }nnplQyees .
C
RECOMMENDATION D ‘i`° '678
Z
It is my recommendation that the City appoint Dr. Thaddeus
Chao as the City's Health Officer for 1991.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass
a motion appointing Dr. Thaddeus Chao, 783 Hokah Avenue, as the
Health Officer for the City of Mendota Heights for 1991.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis
SUBJECT: Designation of Health Officer for 1991
December 27, 1990
DISCUSSION
a
Dr. Thaddeus Chao has once again o€ered to serve, without
compensation, as the City's Health Officer for 199 .
�. ngo; na d i es --as the--C=ty'-s—Hea-1 Lh Off.icer—are--min i ,l7 rr
r
��,,,,L,_.�,a,,,".�n��9�-0—B�—Ghao--ad�tt-rrl-i-s't-e-re� T-�-�=r�r�oe�a�ica�•s--to
a171--i-nterested—publ ii fet }nnplQyees .
C
RECOMMENDATION D ‘i`° '678
Z
It is my recommendation that the City appoint Dr. Thaddeus
Chao as the City's Health Officer for 1991.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs with the recommendation, they should pass
a motion appointing Dr. Thaddeus Chao, 783 Hokah Avenue, as the
Health Officer for the City of Mendota Heights for 1991.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 27, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Designation of Official Newspaper
INTRODUCTION
At its first meeting of the year, Council must conduct
certain annual actions. One action necessary is the designation
of an official City newspaper for the year.
INFORMATION
As of this date, we have received a request for official
newspaper designation from only one paper, the West St.
Paul/Mendota Heights Sun -Current. The Sun -Current, published by
Minnesota Suburban Publications, has been the City's official
newspaper for many years. The rates quoted for legal
publications in the attached letter are in accordance with limits
established by State Statutes.
The Sun -Current meets statutory requirements for designation
as the official newspaper. Its legal department has been good to
work with, and a fax line is available to accept transmission of
faxes for publication.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that Council designate the West St. Paul/Mendota
Heights Sun -Current as the City's official newspaper for 1991.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a
motion to designate the West St. Paul/Mendota Heights Sun -Current
as the City's official newspaper for 1991.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
December 27, 1990
TO: Mayor, City Council, City Administ
FROM: Kathleen M. Swanson
City Clerk
SUBJECT: Designation of Official Newspaper
INTRODUCTION
At its first meeting of the year, Council must conduct
certain annual actions. One action necessary is the designation
of an official City newspaper for the year.
INFORMATION
As of this date, we have received a request for official
newspaper designation from only one paper, the West St.
Paul/Mendota Heights Sun -Current. The Sun -Current, published by
Minnesota Suburban Publications, has been the City's official
newspaper for many years. The rates quoted for legal
publications in the attached letter are in accordance with limits
established by State Statutes.
The Sun -Current meets statutory requirements for designation
as the official newspaper. Its legal department has been good to
work with, and a fax line is available to accept transmission of
faxes for publication.
RECOMMENDATION
I recommend that Council designate the West St. Paul/Mendota
Heights Sun -Current as the City's official newspaper for 1991.
ACTION REQUIRED
If Council concurs in the recommendation, it should pass a
motion to designate the West St. Paul/Mendota Heights Sun -Current
as the City's official newspaper for 1991.
1
MINNESOTA SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS
Post Publications and Minnesota Suburban Newspapers
19 December 1990
City Council
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN
55118
Dear Council Members:
We would appreciate your designation of the West St. Paul/Mendota
Heights Sun -Current to be your official newspaper for the 1991
year.
Our company prides itself on home delivery of quality weekly
newspapers that are timely and informative. By designating us to
publish your public notices, we can best serve the residents of
your city.
The new rate structure for legals effective January 1, 1991 will
be:
1 column width
$ .62 per line - first insertion
$ .34 per line - second insertion
2 column width
$1.24 per line - first insertion
$ .68 per line - second insertion
Includes notarized affidavits on each of your publications.
All legal notices should reach this office by Tuesday noon the
week prior to our Wednesday publications. Please direct your
publications to the attention of Meridel Hedblom, Legal
Publications, MSN, 7831 East Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN
55439. Our fax number is 896-4818.
We appreciate being considered as the official newspaper for the
ensuing year and look forward to a mutually beneficial working
relationship.
General Manager
GP:kt
New Hope Office: 8801 Bass Lake Road, New Hope, MN 55428 Phone: (612) 536-7500
Bloomington Office: 7831 East Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN 55439 Phone (612) 896-4700
1
MINNESOTA SUBURBAN PUBLICATIONS
Post Publications and Minnesota Suburban Newspapers
19 December 1990
City Council
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN
55118
Dear Council Members:
We would appreciate your designation of the West St. Paul/Mendota
Heights Sun -Current to be your official newspaper for the 1991
year.
Our company prides itself on home delivery of quality weekly
newspapers that are timely and informative. By designating us to
publish your public notices, we can best serve the residents of
your city.
The new rate structure for legals effective January 1, 1991 will
be:
1 column width
$ .62 per line - first insertion
$ .34 per line - second insertion
2 column width
$1.24 per line - first insertion
$ .68 per line - second insertion
Includes notarized affidavits on each of your publications.
All legal notices should reach this office by Tuesday noon the
week prior to our Wednesday publications. Please direct your
publications to the attention of Meridel Hedblom, Legal
Publications, MSN, 7831 East Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN
55439. Our fax number is 896-4818.
We appreciate being considered as the official newspaper for the
ensuing year and look forward to a mutually beneficial working
relationship.
General Manager
GP:kt
New Hope Office: 8801 Bass Lake Road, New Hope, MN 55428 Phone: (612) 536-7500
Bloomington Office: 7831 East Bush Lake Road, Bloomington, MN 55439 Phone (612) 896-4700
LIWE SUbURbAN NEWSPAPERS
2515 E. Seventh Avenin
North St. Paul, MN 55109
(612) 777-8800
113,\'°
cipc-1
December 26, 1990
Honorable Mayor Charles Martensotto and City Council
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
Dear Mayor Martensotto and Council Members:
We ask that you designate the South-West Review as the legal newspaper
for the City of Mendota Heights for the year of 1991. We ask that the
designation be made at your first council meeting of 1991.
Legal publication rates for minutes of regular and special • meetings, bids,
etc., are $3.50 per column inch, $4.06 per column inch tabulated and $3.00
per column inch for each additional publication in 6 point type.
Thank you for considering us for your legal newspaper.
Very truly yours
N. Theodore Lillie
NTL/RJE:lkr
Raymond J. Enright
L J
RAMSEY COUNTY REVIEW - MAPLEWOOD REVIEW - OAKDALE-LAKE ELMO REVIEW - NEW BRIGHTON BULLETIN - SHOREVIEW BULLETIN
LI[tiE ST. ANTHONY BULLETIN - SHOPPING REVIEW - SHOPPING REVIEW EAST - ROSEVILLE REVIEW
NEWS SOUTH-WEST REVIEW - WOODBURY-SOUTH MAPLEWOOD REVIEW - FRIDLEY SHOPPING BULLETIN - NORTH*SHOPPING BULLETIN
LIWE SUbURbAN NEWSPAPERS
2515 E. Seventh Avenin
North St. Paul, MN 55109
(612) 777-8800
113,\'°
cipc-1
December 26, 1990
Honorable Mayor Charles Martensotto and City Council
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118
Dear Mayor Martensotto and Council Members:
We ask that you designate the South-West Review as the legal newspaper
for the City of Mendota Heights for the year of 1991. We ask that the
designation be made at your first council meeting of 1991.
Legal publication rates for minutes of regular and special • meetings, bids,
etc., are $3.50 per column inch, $4.06 per column inch tabulated and $3.00
per column inch for each additional publication in 6 point type.
Thank you for considering us for your legal newspaper.
Very truly yours
N. Theodore Lillie
NTL/RJE:lkr
Raymond J. Enright
L J
RAMSEY COUNTY REVIEW - MAPLEWOOD REVIEW - OAKDALE-LAKE ELMO REVIEW - NEW BRIGHTON BULLETIN - SHOREVIEW BULLETIN
LI[tiE ST. ANTHONY BULLETIN - SHOPPING REVIEW - SHOPPING REVIEW EAST - ROSEVILLE REVIEW
NEWS SOUTH-WEST REVIEW - WOODBURY-SOUTH MAPLEWOOD REVIEW - FRIDLEY SHOPPING BULLETIN - NORTH*SHOPPING BULLETIN
CITY OF NENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin
FROM: James E. Danie
Public Works D
ctor
December 28, 1990
and Guy Kullander
Park Manager
SUBJECT: Architect Selection for Mendakota Park
BACKGROUND
Barton-Aschman, the City's park designers are landscape
architects, but do not have registered building architects with
their firm. All public buildings need to be designed by a regis-
tered architect, therefore the City needs to hire architects to
design the structures to be built within the parks Barton-Aschman
is doing the site design for. Kodet Architects were hired on
Barton-Aschman's recommendation to design the comfort station at
Sibley Park, it was felt that a different architect should be
utilized for the Mendakota Park designs.
DISCUSSION:
There are three new buildings proposed for the Mendakota
Park site, and at their last meeting Council directed staff to
interview architects to complete the architecture necessary for
these buildings. The architect selected is to prepare construc-
tion drawings for a two level comfort station and for a picnic
shelter for construction in 1991. The architect is also to
prepare schematic design drawings for a future band shelter to
make it architecturally compatible with the comfort station and
picnic shelter.
As was done at Sibley Park, staff intends to act as the
general contractor on this project. The budget for the project
is as follows:
2 Level/Comfort Station $75,000
Picnic Shelter
22,000 (originally
budgeted for
Kensington
Park)
Band Shelter Future
Tom Lawell, Guy Kullander and myself interviewed two
tects for the project as follows:
Neil Weber, Schwartz/Weber Architects
Park Buildings)
Keith Sjoquist, Station 19 Architects
with).
archi-
(Eagan's Architect for
(A firm I was familiar
CITY OF NENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admin
FROM: James E. Danie
Public Works D
ctor
December 28, 1990
and Guy Kullander
Park Manager
SUBJECT: Architect Selection for Mendakota Park
BACKGROUND
Barton-Aschman, the City's park designers are landscape
architects, but do not have registered building architects with
their firm. All public buildings need to be designed by a regis-
tered architect, therefore the City needs to hire architects to
design the structures to be built within the parks Barton-Aschman
is doing the site design for. Kodet Architects were hired on
Barton-Aschman's recommendation to design the comfort station at
Sibley Park, it was felt that a different architect should be
utilized for the Mendakota Park designs.
DISCUSSION:
There are three new buildings proposed for the Mendakota
Park site, and at their last meeting Council directed staff to
interview architects to complete the architecture necessary for
these buildings. The architect selected is to prepare construc-
tion drawings for a two level comfort station and for a picnic
shelter for construction in 1991. The architect is also to
prepare schematic design drawings for a future band shelter to
make it architecturally compatible with the comfort station and
picnic shelter.
As was done at Sibley Park, staff intends to act as the
general contractor on this project. The budget for the project
is as follows:
2 Level/Comfort Station $75,000
Picnic Shelter
22,000 (originally
budgeted for
Kensington
Park)
Band Shelter Future
Tom Lawell, Guy Kullander and myself interviewed two
tects for the project as follows:
Neil Weber, Schwartz/Weber Architects
Park Buildings)
Keith Sjoquist, Station 19 Architects
with).
archi-
(Eagan's Architect for
(A firm I was familiar
Staff was pleased with both architects in the interview
however Station 19's proposed cost for services were somewhat
lower than Schwartz/Weber's:
Structure Proposed Costs for Services
Station 19 Schwartz/Weber
Comfort Station $4,500 $6,750
Picnic Shelter $2,250 $2,000*
Band Shelter $ 600 $ 750
(schematic only)
TOTAL FEES $7,350 $9,500
*This is an estimated cost, the architect was confused and
did not bid on this item.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend that the City utilize the services of the
Station 19 Architects to prepare the construction documents for
an approximately 500 square foot comfort station with a two-level
observation deck, an approximately 500 square foot picnic shelter
and the schematic design for a future bandshelter.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they
should approve the selection of Station 19 Architects to do the
structural design work for Mendakota Park, authorize staff to
negotiate an acceptable contract for services with Station 19,
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreed upon
contract.
JED/GK:dfw
Staff was pleased with both architects in the interview
however Station 19's proposed cost for services were somewhat
lower than Schwartz/Weber's:
Structure Proposed Costs for Services
Station 19 Schwartz/Weber
Comfort Station $4,500 $6,750
Picnic Shelter $2,250 $2,000*
Band Shelter $ 600 $ 750
(schematic only)
TOTAL FEES $7,350 $9,500
*This is an estimated cost, the architect was confused and
did not bid on this item.
RECOMMENDATION:
We recommend that the City utilize the services of the
Station 19 Architects to prepare the construction documents for
an approximately 500 square foot comfort station with a two-level
observation deck, an approximately 500 square foot picnic shelter
and the schematic design for a future bandshelter.
ACTION REQUIRED:
If Council desires to implement the recommendation they
should approve the selection of Station 19 Architects to do the
structural design work for Mendakota Park, authorize staff to
negotiate an acceptable contract for services with Station 19,
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreed upon
contract.
JED/GK:dfw
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 2, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Dakota County Legislative Breakfast
DISCUSSION
At our meeting held December 4, 1990, the City Council adopted
the 1991 Dakota County Legislative Policy package which we annually
use to educate and inform our locally elected State Legislators of
issues important to our community. The initial presentation of
these policies will occur on Friday, January 11, 1991, at a
breakfast meeting to be held at the Rosemount American Legion
beginning at 7:30 A.M.
As you may recall, one of the policies for presentation
involves the impact of MSP International Airport on Dakota County.
The Policy includes both paths of the ongoing "dual track" process
which will hopefully answer the question of whether MSP should
remain in its present location and expand, or move to a new
location. With our increased visibility in matters related to the
airport, the City of Mendota Heights has been asked to present this
Policy to the Legislators present.
Early R.S.V.P.'s by Dakota County Legislators indicate a good
turn out for the event. Each City is also being asked to provide
a count of the number of elected officials expected to be present,
and you are encouraged to attend if at all possible.
ACTION REOUIRED
In order that we may provide an accurate count to the _function
organizers, Council should indicate to staff if they will be able
to attend the Dakota County Legislative breakfast scheduled for
Friday, January 11, 1991.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 2, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Dakota County Legislative Breakfast
DISCUSSION
At our meeting held December 4, 1990, the City Council adopted
the 1991 Dakota County Legislative Policy package which we annually
use to educate and inform our locally elected State Legislators of
issues important to our community. The initial presentation of
these policies will occur on Friday, January 11, 1991, at a
breakfast meeting to be held at the Rosemount American Legion
beginning at 7:30 A.M.
As you may recall, one of the policies for presentation
involves the impact of MSP International Airport on Dakota County.
The Policy includes both paths of the ongoing "dual track" process
which will hopefully answer the question of whether MSP should
remain in its present location and expand, or move to a new
location. With our increased visibility in matters related to the
airport, the City of Mendota Heights has been asked to present this
Policy to the Legislators present.
Early R.S.V.P.'s by Dakota County Legislators indicate a good
turn out for the event. Each City is also being asked to provide
a count of the number of elected officials expected to be present,
and you are encouraged to attend if at all possible.
ACTION REOUIRED
In order that we may provide an accurate count to the _function
organizers, Council should indicate to staff if they will be able
to attend the Dakota County Legislative breakfast scheduled for
Friday, January 11, 1991.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 2, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Dakota County Legislative Breakfast
DISCUSSION
At our meeting held December 4, 1990, the City Council adopted
the 1991 Dakota County Legislative Policy package which we annually
use to educate and inform our locally elected State Legislators of
issues important to our community. The initial presentation of
these policies will occur on Friday, January 11, 1991, at a
breakfast meeting to be held at the Rosemount American Legion
beginning at 7:30 A.M.
As you may recall, one of the policies for presentation
involves the impact of MSP International Airport on Dakota County.
The Policy includes both paths of the ongoing "dual track" process
which will hopefully answer the question of whether MSP should
remain in its present location and expand, or move to a new
location. With our increased visibility in matters related to the
airport, the City of Mendota Heights has been asked to present this
Policy to the Legislators present.
Early R.S.V.P.'s by Dakota County Legislators indicate a good
turn out for the event. Each City is also being asked to provide
a count of the number of elected officials expected to be present,
and you are encouraged to attend if at all possible.
ACTION REQUIRED
In order that we may provide an accurate count to the function
organizers, Council should indicate to staff if they will be able
to attend the Dakota County Legislative breakfast scheduled for
Friday, January 11, 1991.
MTL:kkb
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
MEMO
January 2, 1991
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administrator
SUBJECT: Dakota County Legislative Breakfast
DISCUSSION
At our meeting held December 4, 1990, the City Council adopted
the 1991 Dakota County Legislative Policy package which we annually
use to educate and inform our locally elected State Legislators of
issues important to our community. The initial presentation of
these policies will occur on Friday, January 11, 1991, at a
breakfast meeting to be held at the Rosemount American Legion
beginning at 7:30 A.M.
As you may recall, one of the policies for presentation
involves the impact of MSP International Airport on Dakota County.
The Policy includes both paths of the ongoing "dual track" process
which will hopefully answer the question of whether MSP should
remain in its present location and expand, or move to a new
location. With our increased visibility in matters related to the
airport, the City of Mendota Heights has been asked to present this
Policy to the Legislators present.
Early R.S.V.P.'s by Dakota County Legislators indicate a good
turn out for the event. Each City is also being asked to provide
a count of the number of elected officials expected to be present,
and you are encouraged to attend if at all possible.
ACTION REQUIRED
In order that we may provide an accurate count to the function
organizers, Council should indicate to staff if they will be able
to attend the Dakota County Legislative breakfast scheduled for
Friday, January 11, 1991.
MTL:kkb