Loading...
2017-02-28 Planning Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 28, 2017 — 7:00 p.m. Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Adopt Agenda 4. Approve January 24, 2016 Planning Commission Minutes 5. Public Hearings: a. Case No. 2016-41: Jerry Trooien, 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway, Critical Area Permit and Conditional Use Permit b. Case No. 2016-43: Domestic Chickens — revised draft ordinance c. Case No. 2017-03: Holy Family Maronite Church, Conditional Use Permit 6. Verbal Review 7. Staff and Commission Announcements 8. Adjourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Hall at 651.452.1850 with requests. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSON MINUTES January 24, 2017 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, January 24, 2017 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Jr., Commissioners Howard Roston, Michael Noonan, Doug Hennes, Mary Magnuson, Christine Costello, and Brian Petschel. Those absent: None Approval ofAzenda Chair Field proposed that Case 2016-43 to the third position and hear Cases 2017-01 and 2017- 02 first. The agenda was approved as amended. Commissioner Roston indicated that he would need to leave at 8:15 p.m., which was accepted by Chair Field. Approval of December 21, 2016 Minutes Chair Field noted that the minutes needed to be amended to reflect the correct meeting date of December 21, 2016. Commissioner Costello noted that the date needed to be corrected in the first paragraph as well. COMMISSIONER HENNES MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 21, 2016 AS CORRECTED. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Agenda Consulting Planner Phil Carlson, AICP stated that he and Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek has spoken with people who intended to in attendance for Case 2017-01 and had indicated to them that it would probably not occur until approximately 7:30 p.m. The Commission then made the decision to change the order of the agenda to hear Case No. 2017-02 first and Case No. 2017-01 second. All commissioners agreed. It was recommended that estimated times for agenda items not be given or shared in the future. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 1 Page 1 Hearings A) PLANNING CASE 42017-02 MARK GERENT, 697 WESLEY LANE LOT SPLIT Planner Carlson explained that this application was for a subdivision of an existing single-family lot located on the corner of Wesley Lane and Wesley Court, 697 Wesley Lane. The proposal is to split the lot into two new single-family lots, each of which would meet the minimum requirements set in the City Code. There is an existing home in the middle of the lot with a driveway coming up the west end of the lot into the rear. Sharing an image of the proposed survey, Planner Carlson stated that the intention is to remove the existing single family home. The narrow end of the lots would face on Wesley Lane with one using the existing driveway to access a new garage and home, the other accessing Wesley Court coming off the east side of the lot. The proposed location of the homes and driveways are preliminary and for discussion only. The application is for the subdivision of the two lots and not for the actual specific location of the homes and driveways. A key feature of this lot is that it is heavily wooded on the south side, facing Wesley Lane, bermed and rises creating a hidden lot. Staff worked with the applicant to ensure that the rise and berm and most of the existing trees would be preserved along the perimeter of the lot. Staff recommended approval of the application with conditions. Referencing Condition No. 6, Commissioner Hennes asked if drainage problems existed on the site. Planner Carlson replied that anecdotally he had heard that there were. The owner of the property to the west had called and stated, due to the driveway being right on the western property line, that when snow is plowed and when it rains in the summer that the lay of the land is such that there is drainage that would go into the rear yard of the adjacent property to the west. When the new lot is built upon it would be good so as to not aggravate those kinds of problems. Taking out that driveway would be one step, at least in the winter. The plan is for that driveway to come up short and stay in the front of the lot and not create a plowing problem with pushed snow right next to the lot line. This is a detail that would come in at the building permit stage and not at this point. Commissioner Magnuson, indicating that this question was not specific to this application but to a broader audience, noted that there is another lot split request this evening and that it appears to be a lot of this type of requests lately, wondered if the City Council has had any conversations or developed any guidance in terms of how they want the community to look going forward. The City seems to be going from a community that enjoys some pretty large lot sizes to one that seems to be subdividing up into smaller parcels. Planner Carlson answered that he is unaware of any specific conversations taking place. City Administrator Mark McNeill replied that this new City Council that took office on January 1, 2017 has not had that discussion. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 2 Page 2 Commissioner Noonan stated that it is the large lots that can be subdivided because they are in accordance with the R-1 standards; so they can be subdivided as of right. Administrator McNeill noted that this is a valid and appropriate question to ask the City Council in light of the upcoming update to the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Mr. Mark Gergen, 1900 Oak Street, came forward to address the Council and to answer questions. To address the issue of smaller lot splits, Mr. Gergen stated that he is affiliated with building homes all over the Twin Cities area and one of the attractions to Mendota Heights are the lot sizes. A lot 100 -feet by 150 -feet, in the metropolitan area, is a very generous lot. Mr. Kenneth Larson, 703 Wesley Lane, is the owner of the property directly to the west of the applicant's property. He explained that he is very upset about this application. The property line is within inches to one foot of his driveway. He continued by trying to explain the threats to his life and other incidents of retaliation. This supposedly started when the real estate agent told the previous property owners that there would not be anything built on the lot he purchased. After making additional claims, he stated that he is against that property line being abutted within less than five feet from his driveway. He claimed that the moving of the driveway to the front would only make the snowplowing and drainage problems worse. He has already had to replace his sprinklers heads many times. When he got off the phone with Mr. Carlson his daughter, who had been shoveling snow, she pointed out to him intentional grooves that had come into their yard from the neighbors driveway, peeling the sod off. After 25 years he no longer has any patience for these types of shenanigans. Chair Field requested that Mr. Larson keep to the topic at hand, that being the application for the lot split. Mr. Larson stated that he is against this application and that he believes greed has a lot to do with it. He also mentioned that approximately 50% of the trees on the south side of the lot are buckthorn and are a mess. Mr. Patrick Smith, 695 Wesley Court, stated that he is not in favor of the lot split. One of the reasons he purchased his home two or three years ago was because they could not see a home right next to them. Now one of the newly proposed homes will be right in view. The second thing is that there is a drainage issue. The lot where the house sits, the house sits on the top of the berm. The home that would be built towards Wesley Court is actually going to sit in a trough, a low point between the road and the top of the berm. There is already standing water that flows downward toward his fence area. His landscape people have told him that there is nothing that can be done about it. The water is supposed to shed over towards Mager Court, which it does not do. His fear is that if this home is sitting in that cross area, that any type of build up to alleviate that is going to push more water towards his property. His third concern, according to scuttlebutt in the community, is that the lot lines are not accurate. He requested that there be a review done to make sure that whatever the original plot was that the lot lines are accurate. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 3 Page 3 He also noted that it appears that there will only be 24 feet in between the proposed houses. He asked if that is really what anyone wants in the community. There are also approximately 13 trees that sit in the yard and half of those have been deemed to come down; that does not include the row that is on Wesley Lane. It includes the trees that are actually in the yard. Those trees are the ones that he sees out of his window and enjoys. When he purchased his home there was an architectural committee that was part of the covenants of the area. He asked how that is being addressed. Chair Field reiterated that the Commission is only dealing with the lot split and not with any issues that anyone has with the association. Mr. Dave Dresbach, who lies in Block 1, Lot 8 of Rolling Woods Addition at 710 Mager Court, came forward stated that he has lived at his property since 1989. He purchased his property, as have other since, when there was an association governing homes in the subdivision. Such things as home size, fences, and specific uses were subject to approval by association members. This association was abandoned after the last lot was built upon. Many have expected, and have seen, a general adherence to the association expectations. One of the items in the covenant was that no lot would have more than one single-family dwelling. This application seems to violate the spirit of that. At this point, Chair Field stopped Mr. Dresbach and stated that the Commission is only dealing with a lot split, not with issues that were in any covenants and the frustrations arising out of those covenants not being followed today. Mr. Dresbach, referencing the driveway issues raised by Mr. Larson, stated that the variance that was issued to allow the installation of the driveway within a few inches of his property line should be brought back into code. He also recommended the removal of the buckthorn on the property. Ms. Mary Dresbach, the wife of the previous speaker, stated that the lot split is a decision that can be made because there are not more covenants affective in the neighborhood. This is a matter of what the neighborhood should look like. Developers do not care as they are looking to split a lot to build two homes; the neighbors who have been there for a long time are going to deal with the consequences. She understands that legally all kinds of things can be done. She urged the Commission to take into consideration the people that live in the area. Mr. Steve Santos, 673 Wesley Lane, stated that he firmly agrees that the lot split can be a very negative impact on the neighborhood and property values. He comes from the investment community and sees many characteristics of the last real estate bubble seen. If homes start being stuffed into what appears to be undersized lots, it can jeopardize the overall value of all of the properties throughout the City, including his own. He voiced his objection to this lot split request. He echoed the concerns made by Mr. Larson and the issues with his driveway. The January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 4 Page 4 proposed split of the lot and the proposed positioning of the homes do not compliment this neighborhood. Mr. Mark Gergen, 1900 Oak Street, returned to respond on the comments made. To address the driveway issue, he noted that he would prefer to move it over. In most cities there is a three-foot minimum allowed between a driveway and the lot line. The challenge here is that the driveway was there before the neighbor's home was built; in redoing this he would adhere to a five-foot minimum and possibly a little additional. However, the further away from the lot line it is moved the more they would be cutting into the berm and the more trees would need to be removed. To deal with most of the other issues that were brought up, he stated that he would be happy to have a neighborhood meeting and talk about them. He suggested that the neighbors look at what he built at 1900 Oak Street and 1930 Oak Street [a previous lot split] to be assured that this is not something that would be detrimental to the values of the properties. As far as architectural review and those kinds of things, he believes their standards are above what would have been seen in the covenant or restrictions. Commissioner Hennes asked for clarification on where the existing driveway is and where the proposed new driveway would be located. Mr. Gergen pointed out the locations on the survey but reiterated that he would be willing to move the new driveway and have a five-foot buffer between the driveway and the lot line. Based on a question asked by Commissioner Magnuson on whether or not the applicant would be required to adhere to the city code regarding the setback requirements for the driveway, Planner Carlson stated that his interpretation of this is that there is an existing condition and there is a driveway in place as a legal non -conforming situation. However, he believes it would be reasonable to assume they could keep the portion that is there, remove what is not needed, and it would be considered acceptable as a grandfathered in existing condition. Moving it would certainly clean up this situation, provide the required setback, give the relief to the neighboring property owner, but it would require pushing into the berm and removal of the tree. The Planning Commission would be well within their rights to a judgment call on that. Commissioner Roston commented that the Commission is only dealing with a lot split right now; the driveway and everything else will be addressed in the site plan, construction plans, and staff would deal with that later. He then asked if the driveway decision needs to be made right now. Planner Carlson replied that as part of the subdivision process some of these site alteration features could be addressed within the conditions. Commissioner Roston noted that, as he looks at the survey, these are two conforming lots. No lot size variances are being requested by anyone. Commissioner Noonan asked for confirmation on the setback requirement for the driveway if the existing non -conforming condition was not in existence. Planner Carlson replied that it would be five feet. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 5 Page 5 Commissioner Magnus asked if Condition No. 6 could be changed. Instead of reading `not to aggravate', could it be changed to reduce, mitigate, or alleviate. This would be the perfect opportunity to solve any existing drainage problems. Mr. Gergen replied that he would be happy to address this at the neighborhood meeting and to listen to their concerns, and bring it back at that time. Planner Carlson stated that it would be appropriate to try to make sure that the Commission is not making the problem worse with this lot split and whatever happens on the new lots. However, he would not wish for this applicant, the Planning Commission, or staff to promise the neighbors that they would be solving any drainage problems within this application, which is why he worded Condition No. 6 the way he did. Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COSTELLO, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ROSTON, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING CASE 2017-02, LOT SPLIT, BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. No change to the Comprehensive Plan or zoning designation and no variance is requested. 2. The two lots resulting from the lot split meet City code minimum standards and are comparable in size and frontage to other lots on Wesley Lane. 3. The specific plans proposed have placed the proposed future homes and driveways such that there is minimal removal of existing trees, thus preserving as much as practical the existing character of the neighborhood. AND WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit grading and utility plans and dimensioned site plans with associated easements, subject to review and approval of the Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 2. Such grading plans and building plans that will allow for the preservation of the trees on both Parcel A and Parcel B as shown on the survey drawing date 1-13-2017 from Bohlen Surveying and which will serve to alleviate any drainage problems onto neighboring properties. Any other land disturbance must comply with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance document. 3. Front setbacks to Wesley Lane for future structures on both Parcel A and Parcel B shall be 40 feet and 45 feet, respectively, more or less as shown on the Bohlen survey drawing, in order to preserve the existing trees indicated. 4. The applicant shall submit landscape plans, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department, as part of any building permit application. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 6 Page 6 5. The applicant shall dedicate drainage and utility easements on both parcels to be denoted on the Certificate of Survey submitted to Dakota County: 10 feet wide along the front property lines and 5 feet wide along the side and rear property lines. 6. On Parcel A, the rear portion of the existing driveway will be removed, and graded so as not to aggravate drainage problems, and the ground restored with suitable ground cover, as approved by the City Engineer before a certificate of occupancy is issued. 7. Park dedication fees in lieu of land per current City policy will be paid before the subdivision is recorded with Dakota County. 8. The existing home is to be demolished before the subdivision is recorded with Dakota County. 9. Connection charges for sanitary sewer and water main shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. AND WITH THE ADDITION THE FOLLOWING CONDITION: 10. On Parcel A, when the building permit is applied for it will adhere to the setback requirements for the placement of the driveway Commissioner Magnuson, for the record, commented that she would vote in favor of this because this lot split meets the requirements as they exist in the code and there is no reason not to vote for it under those circumstances. She was glad to hear that the whole issue of this subdivision process may be something that can be studied more in depth as the Comprehensive Plan is looked up and updated going forward. Chair Field stated that he understands where Commissioner Magnuson is coming from; however, he was unsure if in the Comprehensive Plan Amendments there would be any changes to the subdivision process. The only thing that can be changed is the land use. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its February 7, 2017 meeting. B) PLANNING CASE #2017-01 DBG, LLC, 1919 HUNTER LANE LOT SPLIT & CRITICAL AREA PERMIT Planner Carlson explained that this application was for a lot split and critical area permit on a property located on Hunter Lane and Culligan Lane. There is an existing home in the middle of the lot and the lot is large enough to accommodate a lot split. This split would create two lots both of which would face Hunter Lane. The lots each would meet the minimum size required by City Code. The additional issue with this application is that it is within the critical area and so some increased scrutiny is required. The critical area is a unique feature, a unique natural resource, and any development in or near it should be considered carefully. Planner Carlson shared an aerial view of the property in relation to the Mississippi River and the critical area bluff. The corner of January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 7 Page 7 this property is 400+ feet from the beginning of the bluff. There are standards in the code that want a setback 40 to 50 feet from the bluff for any kind of disturbance to ensure that the character of the bluff and the visibility from the Mississippi River is not compromised. In this case, this property is sufficiently far away that there would be very little impact on the critical area. The applicant has submitted plans that show some trees being removed from the property and has been asked, as part of the review process, if some of those trees could be preserved. When looking at the preliminary grading plan, it appears that the grading would take out two trees that front on Hunter Lane. These trees appear to be large mature trees and it would seem that some small adjustment in the grading plan could preserve the ground near them and allow them to remain. The applicant has submitted plans, survey, preliminary grading plan, and proposed building areas that meet the standards in the City Code. Staff recommended approval of this application with conditions. Planner Carlson mentioned two specifics, 1) if there is a way to adjust the plan to accommodate the preservation of the two trees; and 2) there is a City project for the street reconstruction that would affect these properties and that is noted one of the five conditions. Commissioner Noonan was struck by the similarities of this application with the previous one heard and took the opportunity to compare the conditions. In this particular case he noticed that there is no requirement for parkland dedication or payment in lieu of parkland and asked if that was an oversight. Planner Carlson replied that this lot was originally two lots that were facing the other way and so the parkland dedication has already been paid. Commissioner Roston asked for confirmation that two lots already exist on the property; the only thing the Commission is doing is rotating the lot lines. Planner Carlson confirmed that this is the case. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Mr. Mike Fritz with DBG, LLC came forward to address the Commission and answer questions. He noted that the purpose of rotating the lot lines is to help minimize any grading issues. Commissioner Magnuson asked what the `little pebbly things' were on the photograph provided by staff. Mr. Fritz replied that would be the location of the new proposed driveways. Mr. Fritz also commented that in his opinion the two trees in question are not in good condition and with the demolition of the current house they would be impacted and not would survive. Commissioner Magnuson asked about the remaining three trees. Mr. Fritz replied that those could definitely stay. Chair Field asked if the Libertini family currently owned this property. Mr. Fritz replied in the affirmative. Chair Field noted for the record that he works with Mr. Libertini and; therefore, may January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 8 Page 8 have a conflict of interest. He did not recognize the address as being that of Mr. Libertini but if anyone feels that there may be a conflict of interest he would be happy to recuse himself from voting on this application. Mr. Scott Miller, 1021 Wagon Wheel Trail, came forward on behalf of the Libertini family. He too asked for confirmation that this is merely a movement of the lot lines, not an actual lot split. Planner Carlson confirmed. Mr. Miller continued by stating that he understands the Abrams sent in a couple of questions, one of which he believed was addressed in the presentation; that being the drainage. He continued by referencing the Mendota Heights City Code 12-1D-4, D2 that reads "Whenever buildings have been built on one side of the street between two (2) intersections, no building shall hereafter be erected to extend closer toward the street than the average of the required district setback and average setback of the adjoining principal structures". He stated that when they did the calculation for the setback they did only the adjoining neighbor; however, the code reads `structures' — plural. Most of the communities he has worked in take the average of the entire street. The concern is that they could legally go about 38 feet from staff's calculations. The first neighbor is approximately 46 feet and, he believed, the adjoining neighbors are even further back. He would like to see if the developer could accommodate on parcel two, where it borders Culligan Lane, if that could be setback to meet the adjoining neighbors — if they would be willing to do that. His next question was regarding the teardown of the home and wished to ensure that City Code 12-1E-1, A5A that reads "Tear down and construction of new single-family dwellings and additions, modifications, and alterations to existing dwellings shall not raise the first floor elevation more than one foot (1) above the existing condition" would be adhered to. Planner Carlson replied that this would be his interpretation of this portion of the code and that it would be required. He would also like to have the location of the trees addressed to prevent sight -line issues as people are driving down Hunter Lane and turning onto Culligan Lane. Mr. Wes Cutter, 1169 Veronica Lane, asked about the trees along the north property line and if they were going to be impacted by the construction of the homes. Chair Field reiterated that the Commission was merely looking at a lot split, not on the removal of trees. Mr. Cutter asked how he could find out if those trees were to be impacted. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek came forward and pointed out that the trees in question were actually on the property to the north and not on the subject parcel. Mr. Cutter stated that he understands that this lot split is perfectly legal but he would hate to see a large lot like this go away. Ms. Becky Doherty, who lives down the hill from the subject parcel, also agreed that this is a perfectly legal lot split but voiced her opposition. She also noted that even after having the street rebuilt they still have a problem with drainage runoff. She hoped that when they built the new January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 9 Page 9 house they would take that into consideration. She also had a concern about safety issues with the driveway entrances being on Hunter Lane. Mr. Mike Fritz with DBG, LLC returned and stated that one of the reasons for removing the trees on the corner is for safety. However, they are not opposed to planting new trees along Culligan Lane as replacements. He believes that opening up the corner is a good idea. He also noted, based on the documents provided to staff, they meet the setback requirements on both streets as they are applying front yard setbacks to both the Hunter Lane and Culligan Lane sides of the lots. Planner Carlson noted that when a building permit comes they would apply the setback rules in the code and make sure that it is cited properly; likewise with the first floor elevation. Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER COSTELLO, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ROSTON, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING CASE 2017-01, LOT SPLIT & CRITICAL AREA PERMIT BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. No change to the Comprehensive Plan or zoning designation and no variance is requested. 2. The two lots resulting from the lot split are comparable in size and frontage to other lots in the area. 3. The plans and approvals required in the building permit process will serve to ensure adherence to the spirit and intent of the Critical Area code. AND WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The applicant shall submit grading and utility plans and dimensioned site plans with associated easements, subject to review and approval of the Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 2. The applicant shall submit landscape plans, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department, as part of any building permit application, such additional landscaping to be compatible with the spirit and intent of the Critical Area. This will include revisions to the submitted grading and landscape plans to allow the 20" pine and 22" pine trees on the Hunter Lane frontage to remain if at all possible. 3. The applicant shall dedicate drainage and utility easements on both parcels to be denoted on the Certificate of Survey submitted to Dakota County: 10 feet wide along the front property lines and 5 feet wide along the side and rear property lines. 4. The existing home is to be demolished before the subdivision is recorded with Dakota County. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 10 Page 10 5. Connection charges for City Project # 200902 shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this application at its February 7, 2017 meeting. C) PLANNING CASE #2016-43 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DOMESTIC CHICKENS — DRAFT ORDINANCE Chair Field noted that in December 2016 the Planning Commission had a discussion of possible things to do with chickens and forwarded their comments to the City Council, who in turn returned it back to them and asked them to draft a proposed ordinance for the City Council's consideration. The objective this evening was to look at drafting an ordinance for the City Council's consideration. Planner Carlson highlighted some of the issues in the draft ordinance that staff has created for consideration by the Planning Commission. Staff took into consideration many comments from discussions had at the Planning Commission and the City Council. There are also a number of very interested residents in this issue. This draft ordinance does amend both the Animal Control section of the City Code and the Zoning Code. It was organized to allow the keeping of domestic chickens as a permitted accessory use. It was suggested that there be an annual permit with a fee but no fee amount of specified. There were no screening of chicken coops and runs proposed in the ordinance; however, it is an important issue and can be added as appropriate. The area or size was taken from other cities; two square feet for the coop and five square feet for the run. Staff suggested in this ordinance that the composting of waste could be allowed if handled properly. Staff also suggested a six-foot height to the coop but has received comments back from residents that this is unreasonable and much too low. Staff suggested ten -foot side setbacks and thirty-foot rear setback. Other accessory uses are allowed simply a five-foot setback on side and rear. Staff did not include a requirement for neighbors to sign off. Planner Carlson felt strongly, as a planner who engages in land use law discussions, that staff should not require the code to need sign off by neighbors; it should stand on its own. Planner Carlson then went through the points of the ordinance with the Planning Commission: • Section 5-3 of the code be titled `Domestic Animals' • Section 5-3-1 to include the definition of what a chicken is and refers to its' Latin name of Gallus and species of Gallus domesticus January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 11 Page 11 • Addition of Section 5-3-IOA with clarification of up to four female chickens, kept in an accessory structure, and refers back to the Zoning Code that would then have the bulk of the regulations and 5-3-1OB which is the Animal Warden authority • Since a new section was added then the following sections would be renumbered to follow suit Chair Field asked if there was a definition of `Animal Warden' elsewhere in the code. Planner Carlson replied that the City Council appoints an Animal Warden and that is in the Police Department, who then contract out for that service. A clear definition of that is outlined in that appointment. • Section 12-113-2 — domestic chickens was added to ANIMALS, DOMESTIC with definitions of Domestic Chickens, Chicken Coop, Chicken Run, and Rooster included • Section 12 -1D -3C Accessory Structures was amended to include Chicken Coops and Runs with specific requirements o Dimensions o Height o Construction requirements (included requirement of screening of the coop and run; however, Planner Carlson left that up to the Commission to determine if it should remain in or not) In regards to the maximum height requirement of six feet, Planner Carlson shared some comparisons between a garage [maximum height is the average between the roof peak and the eave gutter line] and accessory structures [allowed to be 15 feet high]. One could build a shed that is meets that definition without any questions asked. Staff's initial recommendation was that coops have a maximum six-foot height level. However, one of the objections is that this is way to short to allow the entering of the coop and still have some breathing room. This is open for discussion and possible change. Another issue is the setbacks. He then shared a graphic showing a sample lot that is typical of the minimum lot size with the minimum setbacks indicated. o Regulations o Permit process • Section 12 -1D -3C.2 amended by renumbering and amending sub -paragraph 2 regarding the number of accessory structures on a property • Section 12 -1E -3C amended to add the conditional use of keeping chickens for noncommercial purposes Planner Carlson noted that several emails had been received on this subject and copies had been provided to the Commissioners. Chair Field noted that these emails would be incorporated into the public record. Commissioner Roston noted that he had submitted an email as part of the public record; however, unfortunately he needs to leave for a prior commitment. In his email he stated that he would recommend the 30 -foot setback and the screening be required. He is opposed to the January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 12 Page 12 composting, as, in his experience, most people do not do it correctly. He would also recommend that this be a conditional use permit rather than a permitted use. He has already voice his opposition to the keeping of chickens but has lost that battle already. Commissioner Hennes asked the reasoning for the 30 -foot setback. Planner Carlson replied that they simply suggested that the chicken coop would meet the same setback requirements as a structure. Commissioner Magnuson asked how Planner Carlson wanted them to proceed, should they comment on the draft itself now or have the public hearing first. It was suggested that the public hearing take place first. Councilmember Petschel asked if fencing in the run would be exempt from the opacity requirements for fencing in general. Planner Carlson replied that he does not know what those opacity requirements are. Public Works Director Ryan Ruzek stated that he believes the ordinance instructs for a 30% clear fence in the residential district. However, this is a good question. Chair Field opened the public hearing. Mr. Patrick Watson, 1327 Delaware Avenue, stated that he is in support of this ordinance. In regards to the setback requirement he noted that some of the lots in older neighborhoods, especially north of Dodd Road and south of Highway 110, are not the typical lot size of 100 x 150; some are 75 x 100. He shared images of two such properties, owned by supports of this ordinance, with indications of where the coops would be legally situated; one would end up being in the location currently occupied by the deck and the patio and on the other property, a large tree occupies the only acceptable spot. He also noted that his neighbor, who is also in support of this ordinance, has a lot of trees and no place to put a coop inside of the setback requirements as proposed. They have an existing accessory structure that they would love to incorporate into a coop structure. Unfortunately it goes above the six-foot average height requirement. He believes that if the Commission keeps the setback requirements as proposed they will see a lot of variance requests for coop placement. He also pointed out that dog kennels are allowed in the five-foot accessory structure area. In regards to the height requirement, his neighbor wanted to convert part of his garden shed into a chicken coop. However, his garden shed is nine feet tall. Commissioner Hennes asked Mr. Watson, given all of the research he has done, what he would recommend. Mr. Watson stated that an accessory structure is an accessory structure; there is already a screening requirement in the proposed ordinance for a chicken coop, which makes a great concession to people who don't necessary look at what their neighbors doing on their property. He would be OK with the screening requirement if the Commission could get away from the 30 -foot setback requirement. As for the height, he would not change the accessory January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 13 Page 13 structure height just for a chicken coop. In his opinion no one would build a 15 -foot tall chicken coop. However, if they did there is a screening requirement. Mr. Alex Theobald, 1045 Delaware Avenue, noted that the City Council agreed to allow four chickens per lot in the City, that the structure be constructed so that it is easily cleaned, and the chickens are enclosed and protected. He continued by explaining that a six-foot maximum height would not make for an easily cleaned structure. Also, standard door heights are six feet eight inches. If the structure were allowed to accommodate a standard door it would make construction a lot easier. In relation to the setback requirement, Mr. Theobald recommended they keep the accessory structure setback of five feet. These buildings are going to look quite similar to any other accessory structure that is already in existence. Mr. Theobald then asked questions regarding the screening and what the actual requirements would be for that. Planner Carlson, referencing City Code 12-1I-9 that reads "Any use in the I district abutting on the R district that shall have open storage shall be effectively screened from the eye level vision by providing and maintaining a wall, fence or planting strip to screen and reduce the noise, dust and vision between the two (2) uses. Such wall or fence shall be six feet (6) in height and at least ninety percent (90%) opaque during all seasons", noted that the reference stayed in the draft ordinance but the actual standard did not. He invited the Planning Commission to decide what, if anything, they would like to do about screening. Mr. Theobald stated that there is another screening option in the code; Section 12 -IE -IC that reads "Screening Of Certain Materials: All waste material, debris, refuse, garbage, fuel including woodpiles of two (2) cords or larger (a cord is 4 feet x 4 feet x 8 feet), or materials not currently in use for construction shall be stored indoors or totally screened from the eye level view from public streets and adjacent properties". Mr. Theobald asked if the email he had sent was now a part of the public record. The answer was in the affirmative. Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Commissioner Magnuson asked how height is measured. Planner Carlson replied that it is the average from the eaves to the peak. If it is a flat roof, then it is just the height. However, the six- foot height was a number that was pulled out of the air and it would be appropriate for the Commission discuss and decide what might be appropriate. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 14 Page 14 Commissioner Magnuson also asked about the floor of the chicken coop; the draft states that the minimum is two square feet per chicken and then it goes on to say that the floor area of the run must be five square feet. She asked if that should read `a minimum of five square feet'. Planner Carlson replied that `minimum' would be appropriate. She then noted that at one point the ordinance states that the construction of and materials used for the chicken coop and run must adequate to prevent access by rodents. She wondered about other animals, such as raccoons, etc. Planner Carlson replied that he would check on whether or not the word vermin would include other animals and agreed that the terminology should be broadened. Commissioner Magnuson asked a question brought up by a resident and that was what happens if someone has a chicken coop and they cease to have chickens; should there be some kind of requirement that if a chicken coop has been abandoned that it should be removed within a certain period of time — or is there a requirement in the code already regarding the removal of a structure that is in disrepair. The reply was that there is a requirement under property standards. In regards to the setback, she asked why the setback from the side yard is only ten feet but the setback from the rear yard is 30 feet. She would be more comfortable with a straight -up ten -foot side yard and ten -foot rear yard setback. She likes ten feet rather than five feet simply because she does not like five feet setbacks anyway. Commissioner Petschel asked if the City requires screening for dog kennels. Planner Carlson did not believe so. Commissioner Petschel stated that if the City does not require it for dog kennels then they probably should not require it for chicken coops. In regards to the setbacks, in practice he believes this would sort itself out. Residents would naturally work with the length of their property rather than the width. It behooves everyone to have a good relationship and work with their neighbors and maybe this does not need to be spelled out in the code. Chair Field agreed with Commissioner Petschel comment on working with neighbors; unfortunately chickens are new to the City and that, to him, is a concern. Some cities started with chicken ordinances on a more regulated basis and then, as things evolved, made changes. Part of him agrees with Commissioner Roston in that a conditional use or at least a permit being subject to the consent of the neighbors as being a viable way to bring chickens into the City and see how they work while still maintaining control. He looks at the enforcement practices of the Animal Warden and they are fairly limited. Once a permit is issued the warden can only intervene if there is a threat to the health and safety of the people or animals. It sounds as if I am a neighbor and there is a real problem but it is not a threat to me it does not appear that the warden can do much of anything. While he does not anticipate any big issues he would like to build a safeguard in there. Planner Carlson noted that this ordinance does amend two parts of the code, the animal control and the zoning. Under the Animal Warden, it does give that position the authority to go in if there is a problem. But the bulk of this ordinance is under the zoning code so it would be just January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 15 Page 15 normal zoning violations and enforcement. There could be an issue with the coop, that it is not quite clean enough or any of those laundry list of conditions that might not get to the point where the Animal Warden would need to go out and address a dangerous situation but still would not meet the standards in the zoning code — the zoning enforcement officer could go out and address it. He also felt quite strongly that the code should not depend on the neighbors approving. The City ordinances are set by the City Council and equal protections is applied to everyone and not relies on the goodwill between neighbors. In regards to conditional use versus permitted accessory use, Planner Carlson stated that to him this is a question or process and money. It was suggested that there might be a $25 fee to put up a chicken coop; however, a conditional use involves several hundred dollars and a 40-60 day process. If comparing this to dog kennels, someone would not be required to go through a several hundred dollars process to put in a dog kennel. Chair Field asked if the permit process was chosen, then in what situation could the permit be revoked. Planner Carlson replied that this would be a zoning enforcement issue. If someone is not meeting the standards that are in the code the permit could be revoked. That has not been developed in the language so far but it certainly could be. Commissioner Noonan stated that he echoed many of the comments made by Commissioner Roston; however, he also echoed the comments made by Commissioner Magnuson and Commissioner Petschel. He thought the comment about a 30 -foot setback does indeed push the coop potentially closer to the rear face of an adjoining house. By the same token he also liked the idea of pushing a little further off of the side yard to get it further away from the lot line. He would support the notion of a reworked rear yard setback but would also support the maintenance of the side yard. In addition, he would echo Commissioner Roston's comment with respect to the permission to compost waste. He is quite right in that unless the City is very prescriptive as to how it's done, it most likely would be done inappropriately. He proposed that the waste disposal provisions be fairly narrowly defined and not permit the composting. Commissioner Petschel asked about fencing — should this be treated like fencing on the perimeter of a yard, which has requirements for visibility, or should it be exempted. Planner Carlson replied that the chicken coop and the run, which would be fenced, could be set back at least five feet or ten feet or more and would not be a perimeter fence. Commissioner Petschel noted that he was inquiring about the requirements of the fencing around the coop and run, not that he agreed it would be the same as a perimeter fence. It was noted that they could quite literally use chicken wire. Chair Field proposed that staff take the comments and discussions from the Commission and create a revised ordinance, making sure the clean up the wording and language that happens when merging two different documents together, and return to the Commission with it. Discussions continued regarding the height of the chicken coop. It was determined that research should be done to determine the standard height of chicken coops in other communities. January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 16 Page 16 The Commissioner then went through the proposed ordinance section -by -section and provided direction to staff of their recommended edits: • Section 5-3-10: Add some enforcement capacity to the warden to be the same or similar to the zoning enforcement officer • Section 12-113-2: no changes were proposed • Section 12 -1D -3C o The run — the run should a `minimum' of five square feet per chicken o The height should be the typical standard rise and run if the eave height is seven feet o The lot setbacks should be 10 feet from the side yard lot line and 10 feet from the rear yard lot line o Construction of and materials used must be adequate to prevent access by rodents [substitute a different term to encompass other animals and rodents] o Remove the reference to screening o Under Fecal Waste or Litter: remove "or composted provided the method used and the location does not present a public nuisance or health issue" o Add language that any accessory structure erected after the issuance of this bylaw shall not be used for the purposes of a chicken coops o Add language allowing for the revocation of the permit COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSION HENNES, THAT STAFF TAKE THE COMMENTS AND REVISIONS SUGGESTED BY THE COMMISSION AND REWORK THE ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THEIR FEBRUARY 22, 2017 MEETING Verbal Review Planner Carlson noted that there were no applications considered at the last Planning Commission meeting and; therefore, there are no verbal updates to provide. Staff and Commission Announcements City Administrator Mark McNeill announced that City Development Director Tim Benetti would join city staff on February 21, 2017. Chair Field expressed his appreciation to Planner Carlson for working with the City while this role was being filled. Adiournment COMMISSIONER PETSCHEL MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:09 P.M. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 ABSENT: 1 (ROSTON) January 24, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Meeting - DRAFT Page 17 Page 17 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone I 651.452.8940 fax www.mendc)ta-helghts.com CITY OF MENDDTA HEIGHTS Request for Planning Commission Action MEETING DATE: February 28, 2017 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP Interim Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2016-41 After -the -Fact Critical Area Permit and Conditional Use Permit Jerry Trooien, 101 Sibley Memorial Highway COMMENT.- Introduction OMMENT: Introduction The applicant is seeking permits to restore vegetation, remove additional vegetation, and do grading and landscape work on a single family property in the Critical Area. Background The property in question was subdivided into two lots in 2014. The larger lot has an existing home and garage. The smaller lot is not yet built on and is the location of most of the proposed work. The Critical Area Overlay District requires permits for any development, grading and removals of trees. The applicant did site work in 2015, removing some vegetation and doing grading work without a permit. He applied for a permit in the fall of 2016 to remove more vegetation. The current permit addresses both previous and new work proposed on the property, to restore what was disturbed, add new landscaping, and make the new lot ready for development. Discussion The applicant provided a new report and drawings, which include new work on the second lot, as well as restoration of areas previously disturbed. The new plans specify native vegetation. Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission discuss the requests in this case and make a recommendation to the City Council. Action Required This matter requires a simple majority vote. Page 18 (3 Stantec Item No. 2016-41 MEMORANDUM Date: February 28, 2017 To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission From: Phil Carlson, AICP, Interim Planner RE: Planning Case 2016-41: 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Critical Area Permit and Conditional Use Permit Action Deadline: June 15, 2017 (applicant agreed in writing to additional 120 -day extension) INTRODUCTION The applicant, Jerry Trooien, wishes to perform additional grading and landscape work on his property at 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway, which is in the Mississippi River Critical Area. He had applied in October 2016 for the original permit, at which time it was discovered that work had been done on the property previously without a permit. City staff has been working with Mr. Trooien and his landscape architect through the fall and winter to understand what work was done previously in 2015 and additional work to be done in 2017. The current application is both an after -the -fact permit to address previous work and a new permit for work to be done. BACKGROUND • The property is 5.04 acres in area. • The property is guided LR Low Density Residential in the City's Land Use Plan. • The property is zoned R-1 One Family Residential. • There is an existing house and garage on the property. • The lot was split in 2014 and a new lot created, resulting in two single family lots - the existing house and garage on 3.41 acres; the new lot on 1.63 acres. ANALYSIS 1) The property in question involves two single family lots on the south side of Sibley Memorial Highway in the Critical Area. 2) The Critical Area Overlay District, Section 12-3-4, has the following definitions, which include the kinds of work previously done and proposed on site: a. "Clear Cutting: The felling of substantially all trees and/or vegetation in an area at one time." This requires a Conditional Use Permit, even for a small area. Design with community in mind Page 19 (3 February 28, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Page 2 of 6 Re: 2016-41 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway b. Development: "... the extraction, clearing, or other alteration of terrestrial or aquatic vegetation... ". Zoning approval and a Critical Area Permit are required for "development" within the Critical Area. 3) Given the size of the property and the amount of trees on it, the previous work and some of the current request might fall into the kind of reasonable maintenance that most homeowners would do without any kind of approval, but because the property is in the Critical Area, review by the Planning Commission and City Council are required for the permit. 4) The attached January 30, 2017 report from landscape architect Stephen Mastey of Landscape Architecture Inc. summarizes the previous and proposed work: a. 12 coniferous trees removed in 2015 - mostly non-native blue spruce. b. 70-80 deciduous trees/shrubs removed in 2015 - buckthorn, black locust, honeysuckle, boxelder and Siberian elm - all invasive species, except boxelder, which is fragile and susceptible to disease. c. 23 blue spruce and one maple replaced in 2015. d. 3 white pine, 3 bur oak, 1 swamp white oak, and 6 tamarack proposed for 2017 - all native species e. Minnesota native prairie mix for all areas disturbed in 2015 to be added in 2017 - diverse, pollinator -friendly, native species. 5) The above report also summarizes the stormwater management proposed for the site, almost all on the new lot, Parcel B, created in the 2014 lot split. This proposed work provides further detail than previously proposed at the time of the lot split or in the previous application as to the intent on the future home lot. The proposed work envisions a driveway turnaround that doubles as a stormwater treatment area, plus a rain garden on the east side of the new lot. The plan moves the new house pad to a 60' setback from the neighboring property, compared with 20' in the original lot split survey. 6) The proposed plan for this new permit is illustrated clearly on the Landscape Plan, sheet L1.1 and the Grading Plan, sheet L2.1, both attached. The new plans use the same driveway access point and easement location as approved in the lot split. 7) The report and plans prepared by Stephen Mastey provide a level of analysis and insight into the Critical Area that we have not often seen in Mendota Heights applications, and are a welcome reminder of the complexity of this environment. The report offers background on the ecology of the area, and the plans offer concrete steps toward restoring the environment while allowing the property owner to do reasonable work. Design with community in mind Page 20 (3 February 28, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Page 3 of 6 Re: 2016-41 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway 8) The previous permit application last fall was to involve a smaller portion of the lot, as illustrated in the map to the right, where tree removal was requested (green area). The disturbed area that was graded without a permit most recently is shown in brown. 9) Earlier this winter when Mr. Mastey was first retained to assist on this project, he requested permission from the City to place erosion control measures on site so as to prevent degradation of the site over the winter and spring. Cold weather was moving in quickly and there was no time to process a permit. I authorized that work, detailed in an email on December 9 from Stephen Mastey: "Per the photo attached I directed the installation of erosion control measures at the disturbed areas shown. The erosion control wood chip waddles (black tubes about 9 inches in diameter) were installed at the downhill or potential discharge zone of the space. In addition to the waddles I directed the installation of a biodegradable product comprised of shredded straw mulch with tackifier. In general this entire space drains into itself. If a large rain fall event or snow melt event occurred the erosion control wood chip waddles would do a very good job at reducing any free flow of sediment or suspended solids past the point of that barrier. Also, the disturbance that has occurred has not changed the natural flow of stormwater." View SE from disturbed area toward Trooien residence This initiative on Mr. Mastery's part showed an understanding of the situation and responsibility to the Critical Area environment, and I applaud him for it. Design with community in mind Page 21 (3 February 28, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Page 4 of 6 Re: 2016-41 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway 10) The attached materials from Mr. Mastey include a Landscape Reference Plan to orient the reader to the other plans (at right). The Landscape Plan (left below) and Grading Plan (right below) provide the details in this area. 11) There are other materials attached, including previous lot split drawings, specs on the prairie mix and proposed trees, plus architectural drawings of concepts for the new lot. The architectural drawings may be interesting to the Commission but have no bearing on the Critical Area Permit. A new owner would not be bound to build a home as illustrated. Design with community in mind Page 22 (3 February 28, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Page 5 of 6 Re: 2016-41 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the revised after -the -fact Conditional Use Permit and Critical Area Permit for 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway with the following conditions: 1) Removal of trees and underbrush will be performed by a qualified professional. Removal of vegetation is confined to the area and the vegetation defined on drawings and photos accompanying the application. 2) Erosion and sedimentation measures will be put in place during grading and construction activities. 3) Grading and landscape work will be performed by a qualified professional. 4) All work on site will only be performed between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm. 5) If and when a new home is proposed on Parcel B, all building, grading and landscape work will require a new Critical Area Permit. 6) If and when a new home is proposed on Parcel B, utility plans will be required for review and approval by the City Engineer. REQUESTED ACTION Following the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Critical Area Permit based on the attached findings of fact. OR 2. Recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit and Critical Area Permit based on findings of fact. OR 3. Table the request, pending additional information from staff or others. Design with community in mind Page 23 (3 February 28, 2017 Mendota Heights Planning Commission Page 6 of 6 Re: 2016-41 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit and Critical Area Permit for 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway 1. The property is within the Critical Area and subject to code requirements of the Critical Area Overlay District. 2. The work proposed involved is reasonable and within the spirit and intent of the Critical Area, if done carefully and professionally. Design with community in mind Page 24 m�— CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Office Use Only: Case #: Application Date: Applicable Ordinance #: Existing Zoning: Existing Use: PLANNING APPLICATION Fee Paid: Staff Initials: Section: Proposed Zoning: Proposed Use: 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55113 651.452.1850 phone j 651.452.3940 fax _ www.mend�ta-heiyhts.cam Property Address/Street Location: � 0 I © Applicant Name: Phone: Lc�eI'2. ZtD, Applicant E -Mail Address: C CCT_E_, 6t MA- I L' . �0r-J Applicant Mailing Address: 101,0 14 kt, a Property Owner Name: Phone: Property Owner Mailing Address: Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Type of Request: ❑ Rezoning 4 Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Variance ❑ Wetlands Permit ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Lot Split/Adjustment U Critical Area Permit ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Code Amendment ❑ Appeal ❑ Other I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. na190Fof Ap icant Signature oTOwner Signature of Owner (if more than one) Da e Date Date Planning Application (modified 6/1/2016) Page 25 Page 1 of 1 I 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, Mid 5518 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.894+0 fax w,. iw,inend ata-heigiits.com MiCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CRITICAL AREA PERMIT APPLICATION Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: Office Use Only: Case #: Applicant: Address: • Electronic and hard copies of all the required materials must be submitted according to the current application submittal schedule. • Submit 1 electronic copy and 2 hard copies (full-size/to-scale) of all required plans. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete.- LI omplete. ❑ Fee, as included in current Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights). NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required to complete the project. ❑ Completed Application Form(s). ❑ Letter of Intent. ❑ Site Plan. APPLICANT MUST CHECK ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL Site Plan (may include multiple sheets): ❑ Location of the property, including such information as the name and numbers of adjoining roads, railroads, existing subdivisions, or other landmarks. ❑ Existing topography as indicated on a contour map having a contour interval no greater than two feet (2') per contour; the contour map shall also clearly delineate any bluff line, all streams, including intermittent streams and swales, rivers, water bodies, and wetlands located on the site. ❑ A plan delineating the existing drainage of the water setting forth in which direction the volume, and at what rate the stormwater is conveyed from the site in setting forth those areas on the site where stormwater collects and is gradually percolated into the ground or slowly released to stream or lake. ❑ A description of the soils on the site including a map indicating soil types by areas to be disturbed as well as a soil report containing information on the suitability of the soils for the type of development proposed and for the type of sewage disposal proposed and describing any remedial steps to be taken by the developer to render the soils suitable. All areas proposed for grading shall be identified by soil type, both as to soil type of existing topsoil Critical Area Permit Application (modified 4/5/2016) Page 1 of 2 Page 27 and soil type of the new contour. The location and extent of any erosion areas shall be included in the soils description. ❑ Description of the flora and fauna, which occupy the site or are occasionally found thereon, setting forth with detail those areas where unique plant or animal species may be found on the site. ❑ Description of any features, buildings, or areas which are of historic significance. ❑ Map indicating proposed finished grading shown at contours at the same intervals proposed above or as required to clearly indicate the relationship of proposed changes to existing topography and remaining features. ❑ Landscape plan drawn to an appropriate scale including dimensions, distance, location, type, size, and description of all existing vegetation, clearly locating and describing any vegetation proposed for removal and all proposed landscape materials which will be added to this site as part of the development. ❑ Proposed drainage plan of the developed site delineating in which direction, volume, and at what rate stormwater will be conveyed from the site and setting forth the areas of the site where stormwater will be allowed to collect and gradually percolate into the soil, or be slowly released to stream or lake. The plan shall also set forth hydraulic capacity of all structures to be constructed or exiting structures to be utilized, including volume or holding ponds and design storms. ❑ Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan indicating the type, location, and necessary technical information on control measures to be taken both during and after construction including a statement expressing the calculated anticipated gross soil loss expressed in tons/acres/year both during and after construction. ❑ Proposed size, alignment, height, and intended use of any structures to be erected or located on the site. ❑ Clear delineation of all areas which shall be paved or surfaced including a description of the surfacing material to be used. ❑ Description of the method to be provided for vehicular and pedestrian access to the proposed development and public access to the river and/or public river view opportunities both before and after development; a description of the development's impact on existing views of and along the river. ❑ Description of all parking facilities to be provided as part of the development of the site including an analysis of parking needs generated by the proposed development. ❑ Delineation of the area or areas to be dedicated for public use. ❑ Delineation of the location and amounts of excavated soils to be stored on the site during construction. ❑ Any other information pertinent to that particular project which in the opinion of the City or applicant is necessary or helpful for the review of the project. Critical Area Permit Application (modified 4/5/2016) Page 2 of 2 Page 28 JANUARY 30, 2017 Property Address: 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: After -the -fact Critical Area Permit & Conditional Use Permit Report Summary Analysis: Flora & Fauna on-site is comprised of highly degraded woodland comprised of mostly non-native early successional ruderals - A ruderal species refers to any plant that is the first to colonize land after a disturbance removing competition. The site has been disturbed and there is no old growth forest or indications of remnant plant community present where activities have taken place or are being proposed to take place as part of this project scope. Majority of the plant species that existed in disturbance area and around that area are listed as MN DNR Invasive Species and an Ecological Threat. After extensive investigation of the site, Landscape Architecture, Inc. (LAI) recognizes that if no further intervention takes place in the area that currently exists as a woodland today, it will remain as nothing more than a highly degraded woodland monoculture consisting of mostly shorter Non-native Invasive Species with little or no ecological value. In thinking about what we can do now to positively affect the future of the site looking 50 to 100 years into the future we recommend the proposed interventions detailed within this report to take place in 2017. The goal is to use this project as example for the City to promote and be more proactive with landowners within the Critical Area Overlay to work to replace the non-native invasive plants with ecologically appropriate plantings for generations in the future to appreciate. Restoration: In 2015 a number of trees were planted after the understood disturbance. LAI is now proposing to plant an additional 30 Native Plants Species per the attached planting plan. LAI also recommends and requests as part of the restoration of the disturbance, the removal of the DNR Invasive Species listed as Ecological Threats throughout the greater site as cataloged within the report. This will set up the opportunity to create a native plant community that more closely resembles a pre -European settlement while also being more ecologically appropriate with the landscape we are proposing. 2350 BAYLESS PLACE • ST. PAUL, MN • 55114 PHONE: 651.646.1020 • EMAIL: STEPHEN@LANDARCINC.COM Page 29 -2— January 30, 2017 Proposed Building Pad: As part of this exercise, LAI is also recommending and seeking approval for the relocation of the 2014 proposed building pad on Parcel B to the interior of the site giving an additional 40 feet of separation to existing residential homes to the East. In 2014 as part of the lot split process the proposed pad was only 20 feet off of the property line - LAI now suggests locating the pad about 60 feet per our revised plans attached. Plants found in area surrounding the disturbance present day and also similar to what has been removed to date as is summarized below. Summary of Trees/Shrubs removed in 2015 Data was derived from analysis of 3/6/2014 & 1/10/2017 Surveys, Aerial Photography over a time span of 2014, 2015 & 2016 & Site Observations. Coniferous Trees (12 removed) 11 Colorado Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) @ average height of 30-35 feet NON -Native Short Lived Tree that is prone to Cytospora Canker - Trees removed exhibited symptoms that they were infected (Cytospora Canker) 1 Pine (Pinus sp.) @ height of 25 feet Deciduous Trees / Shrubs (estimated about 70-80 removed) Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) Listed as a MN DNR Invasive Species and an Ecological Threat: • Aggressively invades oak forests, savannas, prairies and riparian woods, completely eliminating native plant diversity in the understory over time. It thrives particularly on well -drained soils. • Plants leaf out early and retain leaves late into the fall creating dense shade. • Seeds have laxative effect on birds that disperse them. • Introduced to North America as ornamental shrubs. Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) Listed as a MN DNR Invasive Species and an Ecological Threat: Invades primarily disturbed habitats, degraded wood, thickets and old fields crowding out native vegetation of prairies, oak savannas and upland forests, forming single species stands. It reproduces vigorously by root suckering and stump sprouting forming a common connecting root system. It is native to the U.S. and occurs naturally on the lower Appalachian mountain slopes. It has been extensively planted for its nitrogen -fixing qualities and its hard wood. Exotic Honeysuckles (Lonicera tatarica, L. morrowii, L. x bella) Listed as a MN DNR Invasive Species and an Ecological Threat: 2350 BAYLESS PLACE • ST. PAUL, MN • 55114 PHONE: 651.646.1020 • EMAIL: STEPHEN@LANDARCINC.COM Page 30 -3— January 30, 2017 • Exotic honeysuckles replace native forest shrubs and herbaceous plants by their invasive nature and early leaf -out. They shade out herbaceous ground cover and deplete soil moisture. • Seeds are readily dispersed by birds. • Some research suggests that the plant inhibits the growth of other plants in its vicinity. Boxelder (Acer negundo) • Native early successional ruderal. A ruderal species is a plant species that is first to colonize disturbed lands. Form/Height: 30' to 50' on favorable soils with a diameter of up to 36"; rather bushy on unfavorable soils; limbs and branches fragile; tree somewhat subject to fungus disease and attack by insects. Siberian Elm (Ulmus pumila) Listed as a MN DNR Invasive Species and an Ecological Threat: • The tree can invade and dominate disturbed prairies in just a few years. • Seed germination rate is high and seedlings establish quickly in sparsely vegetated areas. • It grows readily in disturbed areas with poor soils and low moisture. • A native of eastern Asia, Siberian elm was introduced to the U.S. in the 1860s for its hardiness, fast growth, and ability to grow in various moisture conditions. Summary of Trees Replaced in 2015 23 Colorado Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) @ average height of 12 to 14 feet 1 Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer x freemanii 'Jeffersred') @ 4 inch Caliper Summary of Native Vegetation & Restoration Work proposed for 2017 3 White Pine (Pinus strobus) 3 Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa) 1 Swamp White Oak (Quercus bicolor) 6 Tamarack (Larix laricina) Minnesota Native Landscapes Pollinator Friendly Mesic Prairie Mix for all remaining disturbed areas due to the 2015 work on-site to receive a very diverse and ecologically appropriate pollinator friendly mix from MN Native Landscapes with locally sourced seed suited perfectly to soils, moisture and light conditions present for this area on-site consisting of 26 species. 2350 BAYLESS PLACE • ST. PAUL, MN • 55114 PHONE: 651.646.1020 • EMAIL: STEPHEN@LANDARCINC.COM Page 31 -4- January 30, 2017 Minnesota Native Landscapes Pollinator Friendly Mesic Prairie Mix (Early Summer) Minnesota Native Landscapes Pollinator Friendly Mesic Prairie Mix (Late Summer) 2350 BAYLESS PLACE • ST. PAUL, MN • 55114 PHONE: 651.646.1020 • EMAIL: STEPHEN@LANDARCINC.COM Page 32 -5— January 30, 2017 Photo of Site looking East near Proposed Building Pad on Parcel B For reference see existing foundation in center of photo to be removed, large tree shown on left is a Black Locust with Buckthorn in understory throughout - both non-native invasive species and ecological threats. Photo of Site looking East at 20 feet from Property Line on Parcel B For reference see existing home to the East of Parcel B. It is higher in elevation (Pink stake is property line). The tree in foreground is a leaning / partially windblown Boxelder, dead limbs are littering the understory with interspersed Buckthorn. After further review of the originally proposed parcel B lot split proposed house pad location which would of put the proposed house corner at this exact location we have revised proposed house pad location. This will allow 2350 BAYLESS PLACE • ST. PAUL, MN • 55114 PHONE: 651.646.1020 • EMAIL: STEPHEN@LANDARCINC.COM Page 33 -6— January 30, 2017 for adequate separation for both the proposed home and existing houses as well room to provide the opportunity for new ecologically appropriate plantings/screening that will benefit all properties. Soils Analysis: Soils are defined as Loam / Silt Loam - per site visit with Paul Brandt of Soil Investigations & Designs Consulting, Inc. on 1/11/2017. Loam - A soil texture with moderate amounts of sand, silt, and clay, sometimes in nearly equal proportions. Good texture for farming and gardening. Silt - Soil particles in between sand and clay in size. Silt feels like flour (smooth and velvety). Also refers to a soil texture that consists of at least 80% silt particles. Summary of Trees Requested for Removal in 2017 Parcel B site preparation request for Proposed Site Circulation & Building Pad Removals within grading limits per attached plans and also removing the surrounding MN DNR Invasive Species listed as Ecological Threats once outside the proposed grading limits onsite: Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) - over 100 @ average caliper of 3-6" Siberian Elm (Ulmus pumila) - about 40 caliper inches Exotic Honeysuckles (Lonicera tatarica, L. morrowii, L. x bella) - about 20 @ 6-8 ft. Black Locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) - about 100 caliper inches Boxelder (Acer negundo) - about 380 caliper inches (many are partially dead) Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) - about 18 caliper inches Hackberry (Celtis occidentalis) - about 30 caliper inches Mulberrry (Morus rubra)- about 24 caliper inches American Elm (Ulmus americana) - about 12 caliper inches Summary of Stormwater Management For the restoration of the 2015 disturbance we are proposing to return the grade within the remaining disturbed area in the center of the site back to original elevation based off of our analysis of the 2014 and 2017 survey exercises. This area appears to be a stormwater recharge area and once original grade is reset we are proposing to plant with native vegetation per this report and attached landscape plans therefore creating a situation that is unchanged from a stormwater standpoint in that catchment. The other area that has been impacted from a grading standpoint on the west side of the entry drive just west of the existing home turnaround has been altered as part of the 2015 work. Upon review of the 2014 & 2017 survey exercises and on-site observations it has been concluded that the 2015 work has actually decreased the direct flow of stormwater to the property directly west which has a home in very close proximity to the property line. Prior to the 2015 work, there was a slope directing the runoff from driveway turnaround and front yard directly toward the adjacent home to the west. After the installation of a small berm with plantings and a small stone wall in 2015, that stormwater is now being more responsibly managed on- site as it has been redirected back into the interior of the site for further sediment removal and on-site infiltration. 2350 BAYLESS PLACE • ST. PAUL, MN • 55114 PHONE: 651.646.1020 • EMAIL: STEPHEN@LANDARCINC.COM Page 34 -7— January 30, 2017 For the proposed grading limits and area we are requesting for approval to prepare at this time for Parcel B, we are creating a series of rainwater gardens with the addition of a subsurface stormwater recharge system utilizing 100% recycled & locally produced aggregate substitute for the stormwater storage & infiltration system. The rainwater gardens are designed to clean the water and remove suspended solids from the flow prior to these basins overflowing into the below grade water recharge system. It should be noted that this proposed system will be collecting and treating a significant amount of stormwater currently being generated off site from the residential homes uphill to the east of this Parcel B. The system is designed to operate in a manner that allows for the post construction discharge to be less than what is currently being created today with the site in its current state. Therefore, we are requesting to build this circulation on-site with a temporary gravel surface and stormwater system prior home construction prior to construction activities to eliminate the opportunity for excessive stormwater runoff or erosion control issues during the home construction process. Once home construction is complete, a final City approved surface will be installed on this driveway. The net effect of these improvements will greatly reduce the amount of stormwater flow with reduced nutrient loads overland across the property boundaries and ultimately contribute to healthier water quality within the Mississippi River Drainage Basin. SINCERELY, STEPHEN MASTEY, ASLA, LEED AP LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. Attachments: 2014 03 06 - 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Minor Sub Combined.pdf 2014 03 06 - 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Slope Exhibit.pdf 201701 10 - 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway - Topography Survey.pdf 201701 28 Modern House Concept Design for Parcel B.pdf 201701 28 Barn House Concept Design for Parcel B.pdf 201701 29 Landscape Reference Plan for 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway L1.0.pdf 201701 29 Landscape Plan for 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Ll .1 .pdf 201701 29 Grading Plan - Parcel B for 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway L2.1.pdf MN Native Landscapes - Pollinator Friendly Mesic Prairie Mix.pdf Bur Oak.jpg Eastern White Pine.jpg Swamp White Oak.jpg American Larch (Tamarack).jpg 2350 BAYLESS PLACE • ST. PAUL, MN • 55114 PHONE: 651.646.1020 • EMAIL: STEPHEN@LANDARCINC.COM Page 35 MINOR SUBDIVISION -form GERALD TROOlEI\I -of- 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Mendota Heights, MN EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision No. 2, except that portion taken by the State of Minnesota for highway purposes. PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPITONS PARCEL A That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20 Block 3 TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County,Minnesota as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north I ine of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 m nutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Jud icialLandmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL B That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line Of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; the North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 61555 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described parcel. PROPOSED EASEMENTS SeeEasement Exhibit for proposed easement descriptions prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated 3-06-14. NOTES VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TWP. 28, RNG. 23 / / / / / 80599 EB.74 IT ONW o, -OH. /. O / / ii NORTH / 808.82 0 /' BI1DRI l Y 9 pe 6 /a t824.40 F Emu /// � ll1. 8NORWMS'N ..:x826.51 DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA / /6615 - v -POINT A• (NO SCALE) /' P� �°Jl / "_ 0'121O .11 / N, / 1� ,0"" / ��P62894 / �0 11 \ �Q�\�' _826.88 827.3.3 Y llG P F'F 806A1 ^9 Z% r ErvsortxB2583 Tt 'kJ 2a .yA�4W.f 0i'� „CLEANWT .,. XP x830.25 MAPiE12 `+t" ry /Y9 /i Oil 1F /8g 5 26 11 / / O�ETjRiNKEN'7 Oy - 1. 2 9J ° "N BHELMa 'g} _ JLMR9 805.63. 06 853 / E61r EB / j i/ T�,G /'/�-NORTH JANE OF i �rI� SEC 23 T28N-R23W /j .28.� x834.11 .-13zy10E30Fi \ EBJ.ao...834 i s 33,39" xa34,53 x �piS�X i / / iA O4, / 1" 836 Jo 83 K't ao...836 3s s6 �� a �� I: O i i' / /i� � <� •J�i' /�/835:B6�EE14 836.56.... ... 12 TRELF .1_ h -ani .....1.. CHE E! $� ..885x05 �w Mf685P 2 p. � �F1�EA1NOUi r < 840.69 I 83891 �z 8 .28 z �\UCE301 z \8422) WS vwi [, 84116 P41 4'FFE �• 0.4OLIFEET ST. OF LOSE L NEST OF LOT LINE -Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 01/13/14. DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED - Property ID No. 27-03700-08-010. / DENOTES DAKOTA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT - Bearings shown are on Dakota County Coordinate System and the breakdownof DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE N Section 23 was done in accordance with the county surveyor's records as `a` DENOTES POWER POLE of this data. DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION �•��;�� - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. e 9 DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (areas DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL ------------------ determined to be outside the 0.2% chance flood plain), according to Flood DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27037CO019E by the Federal DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE E Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 2, 2011. - DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE - This survey was prepared based upon Title Commitment File No. 414389, DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE prepared by Land Title, Inc., issuing agents for Stewart Title Guaranty _- Company, dated January 1, 2014. - Due to field work being completed during the winter season there may be --- improvements in addition to those shown that were not visible due to snow 6 st a>a and ice conditions characteristic of Minnesota winters. - - i E 1 bI EAST'al 87 96d 870.4 IEGENN 67x4 e]p Mme • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 10- DENOTES DAKOTA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT OS DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES HYDRANT `a` DENOTES POWER POLE X 952.38 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION fx DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL ------------------ FROM DAKOTA COUNTY WEB SITE. DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN OHw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE EST.,9,► Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 550140 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 843.0 843.12 aa3's9 G E IN Al mEpp 8!% 8 J 72 848...., .6 BOg 7 z' 0 80n2 r` E11 846.... O 844 x 844.30 PROPOSED 3 FOOT HIGH RETAINING �+ a WALL AS NEEDED. PARCE 'B42"g 1.63 ACI 184173 x e44f10E ORr N x841.51 SP15FT 843.58 �I 1 N2Dy - 842.1\N 43 24 1 1jP 49P9 ASAN B o I9 • x 838 88 I x 4$20' g ...... Axs3 842OS 9s SPRUCE]OFT 842 � a I ' F b 8441)1 TP E,1351T844 'A 6g . J CAI E_ E ....846 �845a0es a, 843.80 .50 SRRUCE30Fi I 98472. meq_'84].49 46.88 B 847.]5% i - I 4]43 846.J \ / g4e. s487EXISTING HOUSE PARCEL A <-,1 3.41 ACRES MORE OR LESS 8o"164280x14 84x148..... I1 - x846.59 K.... 846 Box646 totn _ aa] -as ..I. 848. 8501.M1 .. . ... ......................... w ......1....$so-...eoxtz R 152_.. _. q ......_ x85838 855205x,38 6 857.6%y5.39 26 855.17 3_ CHELMI) X11 355. 851.99 B s POTENTIAL ELECTRIC TO BE SERVICED FROM NEIGHBORING OVERHEAD x BSJ O6 858.31 6 5611 v858,19 y7.72 . j I A., / \ OFSLET LINET: / / y FO CH OESLOT DNET 4a, s IEETT�1 0.53 ENCECOR -NW CORNER'OF LOj 20, BLOCK 3, ' / % EE6B95 _ _ t 11LSEN'S HIGHLAND Y1EIG TS PLAT 3 '\ FERC COR •'�.-NORTH LINE OF LOT$.3Q & 21 BLACK �, "FL3€145-HIGHLAFIf HEIGHTS AT `'3 W'LY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH `- •' LINE OF LOTS 20 & 21, BLOCK 3, f f NLSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 GRAPHIC DtPHTC SC11E SEES. n IN FEET ) I i ch = 40 ft. AREA COMPUTATIONS BENCHMARK TOTAL AREA SITE AREA: 5.04± ACRES MNDOT STATION NAME: BRONCO 2 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY LOTS ELEVATION = 801.26 (NAVD88) DENSITY: 0.40 ± UNITS/ ACRE ZONING AND SETBACKS CURRENT ZONING IS R-1 - ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING IS R-1 - ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FRONT SETBACK 30 FEET SIDE YARD SETBACK 10 FEET OR 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE CONTIGUOUS TO THE SIDE YARD, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, TO A MAX OF 15 FEET. REAR SETBACK 30 FEET OR 20% OF THE AVERAGE LOT DEPTH, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONE R-1 (ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) MINIMUM LOT AREA 15,000 S.F MINIMUM LOWIDTH 0 FEET MAXIMUM H G�9e2� EET -NE CORNER OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3, FLSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J O�UD Date: 3-06-14 License No. 41.. .. DRAWN BY JEN JOB N0: 14010PP DATE: 1-21-14 CHECK BY JER SCANNED ❑ 1 1 Adesc -30-14 ded Descriptions JEN 2 2-07-14 Removed Prop. Ease. Des.. JEN 3 3-06-14 Added Prop. Drain & Util Ease. JEN N0. I DATE I DESCRIPTION BY EASEMENT EXHIBIT -for- GERALD TROOIEN -of- 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Mendota Heights, MN PROPOSED INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL A A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and carona that part of the following described property. That part of Lot 8, AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO 2, Dakota County, Minnesota more particularly described as follows- Thewest 120 00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property That part of the Northeast Quart erof the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23 Township 28 North, Range 23 West Dakota County. M nnesota, described as follows Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3,Dakota County, ounty Minn 'a-ta' nnesota, as ev dented by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an s a coed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East along the north line of Lots 20 and 21 Block 3 TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21 Block 3 as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No 8 thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west Ine of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Jud'cal Landmark No. 9, thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west I'ne of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 14116 feet to the southerly right-of-way Ine of State Trunk H ghway No 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as 'Pont A' thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 se onds West along sad southerly rght of way line and the southwesterly -tension of sad southerly right of way Ine, a d stance of 381.96 feet to the west He of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 e.conds West along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a di of 615 55 feet to the westerly extenson of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 se onds East, along said westerly extenson of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distanceof 2.45 feet to the pont of beginning. The centerine of said easement s described as follows Commencing at the aforementioned 'Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West along said southerly right of way line, a distance of 3700 feet thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 161 79 feet thence southwesterly a distance of 71 25 feet, along a langental curve concave t9 the northwest, having a radius of 30000 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds, thence South 40 degrees 34 mnutes 01 second West, tangent to said a distance of 60.82 feet to the east line of the west 120,00 feet of paid Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and to the pont of beginning of the ,an terline to be described; thence continuing South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West a distance of 30.39 feet; thence southerly a distance of 95.40 feet, along ea tangential c e to the southeast, having a radius of 164.75 feet and a central angle of 33udegreesc10 mnutes 41 scards; thence South 86 degrees 05 minutes 27 Ilseconds East, not tangent to last described c a distance of 57.81 feet to said east ne of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. Thesidelines of said a sfeet of the Northeent are tast Quarter of the Southwest Qo be prolonged or shortened to termin nate o said east line of the west 120.00 uarter. PROPOSED INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL B A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and across that part 0f the following described property. That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows Thatpart of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all 'n Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence o an sO med bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the northline of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No 8 thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Jude icial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet tothe outherly right -0f -way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 mnutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right ofway line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a di stance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a dstance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds E. along said westerly extension of the north Ine of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the pont of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described property. The centerine of said easement is described as follows Commencingat the aforementioned 'Pont A" thence South 52 de res 07 minutes 42 9 onds West along sad southerly right of way Ine a distance of 37 00 feet to the pont of beg nn ng of the centerine to be descrbed thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a d stance of 161 79 feet, thence southwesterly a d stance of 7125 feet, along a tongental curve co cave to the northwest having a radus of 30000 feet and a central angle of 13 degreesn36 mnutes 28 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 34 and 01 second West, tangent to acid Ic a distance of 60.82 feet; to the east line of the west 120.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on said southerly right of way line and said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL A A perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across the north 10.00 feet of the west 120.00 feet and the south 5.00 feet of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property. Thatpart of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an mc ed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of .-.read 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the outherly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAYPLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 see ends West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a d stance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL B A perpetual easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across the north 10.00 feet and the south 5.00 feet of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: Thatpart of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all In Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN''HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an s a med bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 s -and. East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTSPLAT3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line ofsaid Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A", thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along sold westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. LXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described property. III RUB & SONS, 11111119C. EST -1S71 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 550140 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TVVP. 28, RNG. 23 ' aHw a1w� NORTH,-' aPy— R / `-"POINT A" DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NO SCALE) / �� + 7, \ ,KE y Ht•6T' LONE ,uF OYERNM.IEfkT 07 W* a: S za r2 Rz3 s' db'Pkx9 `-NORTH 11NE OF 5EC.23-1,22 4 8N-R23W � i ......832 0 ..834 0101 I d z o N I II\ 6 \ Nw ?J O 841,45 14 HEET .4 01, TP15E3x� OF LOT LINE OF LLINE ST eas'.pq \ POOL i `-- - 1 - i\ FENN LIE 2.0 ET \•\ \ \\ EA T OF L INE' / PRO AND PN Mi,,, N .. ems% �.h 846..... PAD . 844848. 'OSED 3 FOOT -. WAl-KOU RETAINING AS NEEDED. PARCEL 8 842 _._. .. y' PROPOSED 5 FOOT DRi fa AND* UTIUTY EASEMENT 1 I ' I q, I � I II e \ 844' Y8 EX. \\i GARAGE a4S I I T I r�y _ I BQw I I / I j3 I I % / EXISTING oF, HOUSE PARCEL A y 17' i 20 2 2. - POTENTIAL ELECTRIC TO BE SERVICED FROM _ NEIGHBORING OVERHEAD — o8w o ar in J ,r i- i my NO EASEMENT PRONDED FOR OVERHEAD LINES 15 1. FEi W Ll... \_ - FENCE LIES 5.9 FEET NORTH OF LOT LINE �MBTLM�a -- N. CORNER' OF LOT 20, BLOCIt 3, / � TIL$EN'S HIGHLAND 20, TS PLAT 3 '\ \'�,-NORTH LINE OF LOT$. -26 & 21/BLACK 3, / 'NLS€N'S7HMFEANO -7 -NE CORNER OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3, / HLSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 3-06-14 Added Prop. Drain & 1111 Ease. l HEIG A17 AT .'3 W'LY EXTENSION OF THE NORT1 O DENOTES TLSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 N' LOTS 20 & 21, BLOCK 3,, GRAPHIC SCALE DENOTES II�LINE \ \ 1 21 11 11 DENOTES HYDRANT III11 OVERHEAD WIRE E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE `C, DENOTES POWER POLE a4s DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE \n IN FEET ) LIGHT POLE Page 37 DENOTES 1 i ch = 40 ft. NOTES BENCHMARK EASEMENTAREAS - Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 01/13/14. MNDOT STATION NAME: BRONCO - Property ID No. 27-03700-08-010. ELEVATION = 801.26 (NAVD88) INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT Bearings shown are on Dakota County Coordinate System and the breakdown ACROSS PARCEL A (3,670 S.F.) of Section 23 was done in accordance with the county surveyor's records as of this date. INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT This survey was prepared based upon Title Commitment File No. 414389, by Land Title, Inc., issuing for Stewart Title Guaranty hereby certify that this survey, prepared agents ACROSS PARCEL B (5,877 S.F.) pan y, dated January 1, 2014. plan or report was prepared by me or under Due to field work being completed during the winter season there may be my direct supervision and that I am DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT improvements in addition to those shown that w r not visible due to snow a duly Registered Land Surveyor under ACROSS PARCEL A (3,018 S.F.) and ice conditions characteristic of Minnesota winters. the laws of the State of Minnesota. For additional boundary information please refer to the Minor Subdivision =__3 INGRESS/EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated 3-06-14. ACROSS PARCEL B (3,195 S.F.) LEGENDJ& ON E. UD Date: 3-06-14 License No. 41578 • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED "�_'---'' DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 �_ i DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL FROM DAKOTA COUNTY WEB SITE DRAWN BY: JEN I JOB NO: 1401OPP IDATE. 2-07-14 DENOTES DAKOTA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT 3-06-14 Added Prop. Drain & 1111 Ease. JEN O DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES HYDRANT oHw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE `C, DENOTES POWER POLE a4s DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE tX DENOTES LIGHT POLE Page 37 DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE DRAWN BY: JEN I JOB NO: 1401OPP IDATE. 2-07-14 CHECK BY JER ISCANNED ❑ 1 3-06-14 Added Prop. Drain & 1111 Ease. JEN 2 3 NO. DATE I DESCRIPTION BY SLOPE EXHIBIT for- GERALD TROOIEN -of- 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Mendota Heights, MN "0CA] � 4 8.52 C ANOUT { SEE MINOR SUBDIVISION PREPARED BY E.G. RUD & SONS, INC. DATED 2-7-14 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Location: Mendota Heights Scale 1 "= 30'• Denotes Iron Monument Bearing Datum: Assumed Job No. 1401 OPP Drwg By JEN I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me =' or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Run a SONSP IN Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, SUITE 110 E. G. RUD & SONS, INC. LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 g TEL. (651) 361-8200 Dated this 4th day of March 2014. nes eL1tense No. 41578 WWW 6513.361 8701 TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY fora LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INCORPORATED -of- 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Mendota Heights, MN EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision No. 2, except that portion taken by the State of Minnesota for highway purposes. PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPITONS PARCEL A That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Jud icialLandmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19 115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west I'ne of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along sold west I'ns of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL B That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all n Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwester) extension of said souther) right of w line a distance of 381.96 feet Y Y 9 way to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described parcel. PROPOSED EASEMENTS SeeEasement Exhibit for proposed easement descriptions prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated 3-06-14. NOTES Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 01/13/14. - Additional Topography located 01-04-17. - Property ID No. 27-03700-08-010. - Bearings shown are on Dakota County Coordinate System and the breakdown ofSection 23 was done in accordance with the county surveyor's records as ofthis date. - Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.27 chance flood plain), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27037CO019E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 2, 2011. - This survey was prepared based upon Title Commitment File No. 414389, prepared by Land Title, Inc., issuing agents for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, dated January 1, 2014. - Due to field work being completed during the winter season there may be improvements in addition to those shown that were not visible due to snow and ice conditions characteristic of Minnesota winters. - Proposed Parcel Descriptions taken from Minor Subdivision prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated 03-06-14. I MUM • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 10- DENOTES DAKOTA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT OO DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 7.o DENOTES HYDRANT 7 DENOTES POWER POLE X 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION z} DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL S B FROM DAKOTA COUNTY WEB SITE. DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN OHw DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE E DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE 6_AS DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE L DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE ro DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES TREE LINE EST.'S" Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.Com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax(651)361-8701 S;A,udVCADA14projA14010PPA16992TS.dw9 1/10/2017 9Q3�L9 AM CST M VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TVVP. 28, Il 23 / / / / / / / / / / / OHW OHW- --- NORTH \ / 80FT+ / °eoe 6 BITORI / 806 J.3 MH 8 A6 8 285 a., .' /l . t ORwM¢N DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1s - -POINT A" (NO SCALE) �PO /ry�0ryry 826.50 \ / / / .1 onxls X2'4 a41 % Ra e"^` 6 827.33 soRa82583 A HIO, �B25.3AN9 ®CLEOUT L✓-GOJ'Ct j�/ ' / 5827:97 32-2. $�i TME,GF B Y79 0' AASH IO PLE12 //>;O�y2RNMERT $Up-- FND g311M p9 80563 / EBIi EBT 5 % '( i{ - \� =NORTH "INE OF NN/4' SW1 �4 SEC 23 T26N-R23W ` i i r F+ j ��yyr�4Wri 9y9 x83128 "• BPRUCE30FT .?q1 Bt_.,_ 832 \ 01 t..x 834.11 i i i yy i 800 EB 1yry�0 x0,' �% i •i� i \ =J`CJ / ? ��\ .... 834 x83339" x834.53 .:e k3J A001C '�o -TREE �ag20 TVVO 0 3H$ BO% 14 843 82 80X18 Asl�' AIH 69 842B0 4 -x846.59 i' i xi.ETP 5 h.y 8 208 844 ...14 AS411 1. 545 t3, ,m^� 846 B0 - 59 848'. 85011+ yy 4 IR 85 802 850BOX1 w h 3 B00 55 EEe 85 852-.... Oy y REE B 2 854 85438 J TREE, 555 855.38 85512° / 3 y EER BHEC 8OX1 n .. V EE av,5 5 8 55 S 0 3 %55 39 "^ "0511 E A 3 RE a / /y, 8 4 9 0ASNB x An51a1 C ELN17 BE HUB 854 g9 85418 SETSP � 8 9 848 B 965 SET HUB E TI G 855 851.99 4 x APHf /fi cr"'S TREEttT EE11 qg, .? F,OVNDq I 85 of-"Bfr2 - 1 // 83768' 4064\40x7, Ee C UTLE ANC i v 844 00 8 - E ETREEs` 6sr B4l'4B - 0 T049P 92x 840.01 d I BREE� _ 8 3 8 BOP XI 8 5.63 840.46 ESE a 84016 839,45 E ,8842.99 8412000- ---- -�Rl .. - 843.51 0.�. RETWL t x a�SFFUCE4 83887 � p S IL E I® LE I 838.39 �3 T449PRUCE4 m m ETREES -rtE o I 03x5 S B oPRUCE4m ZIm m 4C¢� RUC 4` 86 8 ro ' v,U, 13 884227- w x °' aa1. a R CE4 j''Ca I PROPOSED 3 FOO�Y 370 HI >" GH RETAINING PAR( WALL E4 NEEDED. 845- aa1 az 1 1.63 E.1 73 S42- -ORE B 51 rPHNE r�tt xN88REELNE x ' oz�aaufi IS v a, x845.82 �"� '.4 I.F9aa 1s75w' r 860eA6H1T0 f '$5-. 24 "ye 842.11X oNm, r _+ slPA111 j4079 '165 4 NO�iS4OT 7. 8 SPRUCE4 x `£FEE �?. a 84AR RR SPRUCE4Aj m a. ass:x4 + R, 214 x ` 8:1 4.' 844,58 Q 840.55 840.85 9 \ H x 8041-16 E1REE5 0 \ A FEET FLDTP9WIFST �• 0.4 FEfT NEST OF LOT LINE OF LOT LINE % `'POOL I 843.03 BAFFLEE'tq \ I e re UCEE sPRu qs I SPRUCE 7s I I 847.28Tx-- 47.7s, � I - I 847 99 7.7 848 79 I I I I I I 848.x£ 848.5) I I .8546.71 EXISTING HOUSE PARCEL A A 3.41 ACRES MORE OR LESS ------------------- oD£�Jsa ' eag 63 -POTENTIAL ELECTRIC �Qrk4s _ ELNB i' TO BE SERVICED FROM 849.63 202 NEIGHBORING OVERHEAD SET 846 B Ue. LK - x 858.31 OR 295 B 84648 x6506 r 58. .' x852.92 6 17_ :0 R0'&T DRAINAGE 85525. n EASEMEN Ism x$5300 �, SER�tA 39 } asa z6 n -89 k85819 , 1 .-As I -- 849 F oIT !GARAGE 34.8 847.80 GAR RR SPRUC 6 ed7;Y rt 1 a SPRUCE6 CP "+ 849 �SPRU5oE4 I• .Y� - 4 847.94 3 Dir' 'T' / Yom, �S -1- E6 4 SET WEST / ` CF.LOT 61 E /' NW CORNEROF LOT 20, BLOCK 3, t 850 2 NORTH LINE OF LOT_$.3Q'& 21 BUCK S, / BE60.95 TILSEN'S HIGHLAND WEIG TS PLAT 3 RNC COR y1 1"lt tEN`S-AIGBLAFIf HEIGHTS PLAT,3 / W'LY EXTENSION OF THE NORTH �� LINE OF LOTS 20 & 21, BLOCK 3, , TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 86880 GRAPHIC tnTln cryiL 80 n IN FEET ) 1 i ch = 40 ft. TRF9 n9TA11 'DENOTES ELEVATION M1- -----DENOTES TREE SIZEININCHES DENOTES TREE TYPE Page 39 BENCHMARK MNDOT STATION NAME: BRONCO ELEVATION - 801.26 (NAVD88) NO EASEMENT PRONDED FOR OKRHEAD LINES s­PNCH D.6 FEET EAST EF _0T _0T LINE i7.8J� - FENCTH `s ors FEET 10.53 ggNCECOR ' FN�JLM/B HE CORNER OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JO E JD Date: 1-10-17 License No. 41578 DRAWN BY: JEN JOB NO: 16992TS I DATE: 1-10 CHECK BY: JER SCANNED ❑ 2 3 N0. I DATE DESCRIPTION BY 16YY2TS . S 7-7-17 N. Fill ....... { . IJ 4. , • .. _..,��, .G���� �• • 'mai„ !' � �+y1, a,p _ // y ,.yl.. / '" ,� - ''�-�•�•' / YI F LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. 2350 Bayless Place Saint Paul, MN 55114 Gly" �G� / • � 4 + // ' � / / % ;: .. � _ � . • Stephen@landarcinc.com 651.646.1020 landarcinacom e .. � �yi ,. • ��. •� . �� , / :0�'� •`I / / � , � r,�; PROJECT NAME: 31 • 4 / . ' Trooien Residence - — --.; — •�._..— — .. — — _ ��. _ __�/� — _ — rl` 1010 SibleyMemorial Hw Mendota Height 5511 N 8 s M ao "i . S + / 40 ON '_ �• 'r fel \ I. - --L2 71 - or,,_ r 4. +y. II4.k '� M1. r� •• � L, �-- ~�i i " -�Ld �' I X11 I r - ' -� - . fir. � y \ L • � i /-. K . .,' " lye i •% / p:y •.-Jh ji, • • . _ ie f]� M. �� --a � ;..�. •�` � — , - I I \ ` \ j.� f-- {.. <' ] f _, rte' 1: .. 1611 ' � •d j ..r � I 7 I \ \. I _a_ •�llY�h �l '�f •f ��• y +� •T• ,T - _j • ! OF r--- --------, t25.., , REVISION HISTORY: DATE: TITLE: I hereby certify that this plan specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supery s on and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: Typed or Printed Name: STEPHEN MASTEY Date: 00-00-0000 Reg. No.40629 Copyright 2017, Landscape Architecture, Inc. All Rights Reserved under Law. i 4 / f-- e DRAWINGTITLE: MIN Landscape . ` Reference Plan _i. A 24 r L -T F 161 -----------J/ t._ s -I --- — --- `�--- -- 2341 ■ 0 25: 50' - .'-— — — — — — — d. 20_Mia40 `tip SCALE: 1" = 100' SCALE: 1'=100' DRAWN BY: SPM CHECKED BY: SPM L1.0 -852-- —, — _ ------- 854 -- EXISTING GN FM 1NDATI 52 41 I / 1 '120! _--844------- \\ 1 -'Swamp White Oak I I \3" cal. B&B CP CPW �r --- 1.63 ACRES i c? r� I 3 -Bur Oak MORE OR/LESS 3" cal. B&B ,err 6 Tamarack r r r r r Mesic Prairie \ rrrr r --6' ht. Ctnr. or B& r r r r I Seed Mix r^ • ,\ rrrr oHw or,w oHw 1w 1 r r r r 00 r r r r r r r r r r 8 4p I i r r r r 3- WhitePlne,/ Co --,(33 _ ' ' I 40 9 - Colorado Blue rr Spruce1— / — 12-14' ht. _ r IO\\ r r i I I ' ,Jxislin Woodland Edge44-2 15 - Colorado Blue Spruce ' cas F EX. 1 \ GARAGE 1 1 \ 1' 1 - Colorado Blue Spruce \2-14' ht. q 1 1 Y mal I N / 1 - tumn Blaze Maple `\ II Ln 1 OD \\ 8 -Colorado Blue Spry ce \ �/ i \\ 12-14' ht. 849 9\ A / ' Page 41 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. 2350 Bayless Place Saint Paul, MN 55114 stephenQa landarcinc.com 651.646.1020 landarcinc.com PROJECT NAME: Trooien Residence 1010 Sibley Memorial Hwy. Mendota Heights, MN 55118 REVISION HISTORY: DATE: TITLE: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: Typed or Printed Name: STEPHEN MASTEY Date: 00-00-0000 Reg. No.40629 Copyright 2017, Landscape Architecture, Inc. All Rights Reserved under Law. 0 7.5 15 30 %7%MI W SCALE: 1" = 30' NORTH DRAWING TITLE. Landscape Plan SCALE: 1"=30' DRAWN BY: SPM CHECKED BY: SPM L1.1 / / / / j— / / / I I \\ _ _ r - __ --852----' ----------- --- ------854---- 858, +8M "' 8 eaw o~w 82 EXISTING - / FOUNDATION I ' I � Proposed \ _ I House Pad \\ I I I Proposed Grading -846 Limits; 0.63 AC +851 \\\\ I 11 120'1F \ _ Proposed 6five \\ i I �1I I 1.63 AO S % i 8 6 N0 Ri S �� ' 8 8 / / al / _ ar eatm t i �e i i —1—---------------------\� / / / / / / / / / / I I I I I I IIS U1 0D i I I I I I I \ Existing Woodland EJdge \ I \ v \ I I I \ \ I I EX. GARAGE I \ I I I \ I E I I I 1� I I \ t Page 42�I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. 2350 Bayless Place Saint Paul, MN 55114 stephenQa landarcinc.com 651.646.1020 landarcinc.com PROJECT NAME: Trooien Residence 1010 Sibley Memorial Hwy. Mendota Heights, MN 55118 REVISION HISTORY: DATE: TITLE: I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: Typed or Printed Name: STEPHEN MASTEY Date: 00-00-0000 Reg. No.40629 Copyright 2017, Landscape Architecture, Inc. All Rights Reserved under Law. 0 7.5 15 30 %7%MI W SCALE: 1" = 30' NORTH DRAWING TITLE. Grading Plan SCALE: V=30' DRAWN BY: SPM CHECKED BY: SPM L2.1 i n nesota ative n4scapes 8740 77th Street NE Otsego, MN 55362 Mixed height prairie mix for medium moisture or clay soils MNL Mesic Prairie Mix Seed mixes are subject �0 an based on availability % of Seeds/ PLS Scientific Name Common Name Mix Sq Ft lbs/ac Grasses: Andropogon gerardii Big Bluestem 9.00 4.96 1.35 Bouteloua curtipendula Side -Oats Grama 23.00 12.61 3.45 Elymus canadensis Canada Wild Rye 9.00 2.58 1.35 Panicum virgatum Switchgrass 4.00 3.09 0.60 Schizachyrium scoparium Little Bluestem 15.00 12.40 2.25 Sorghastrum nutans Indian Grass 9.00 5.95 1.35 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed 6.00 5.29 0.90 Forbs: Amorpha canescens Leadplant 1.25 1.10 0.19 Asclepias incarnata Marsh Milkweed 0.50 0.13 0.08 Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed 1.20 0.26 0.18 Asclepias tuberosa Butterfly Milkweed 0.25 0.06 0.04 Aster laevis Smooth Blue Aster 0.15 0.45 0.02 Chamaecrista fasciculata Partridge Pea 2.75 0.41 0.41 Dalea candida White Prairie Clover 2.00 2.09 0.30 Dalea purpureum Purple Prairie Clover 4.00 3.31 0.60 Desmodium canadense Canada Tick Trefoil 1.25 0.38 0.19 Heliopsis helianthoides Common Ox -Eye 2.00 0.69 0.30 Liatris ligulistylis Meadow Blazing Star 0.50 0.28 0.08 Liatris pycnostachya Prairie Blazing Star 1.25 0.76 0.19 Monarda fistulosa Wild Bergamot 1.00 3.86 0.15 Pycnanthemum virginianum Mountain Mint 0.15 1.82 0.02 Ratibida pinnata Yellow Coneflower 1.25 2.07 0.19 Rudbeckia hirta Black Eyed Susan 1.25 6.34 0.19 Solidago rigida Stiff Goldenrod 1.75 3.95 0.26 Verbena stricta Hoary Vervain 1.25 1.93 0.19 Zizia aurea Golden Alexanders 1.25 0.76 0.19 100.00 77.51 15.00 Seeds/sq ft: 78.00 Seed mixes are subject �0 an based on availability Lir ...., 45 Ar i�.•iG •,� � � rte'.. � M �� ,• � IP '@ • j 4 ler ►� ' 416; Evan f•_.•�' �' _ -AOL At .. „. Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak Height: 50-80' Lone: 3-8 Spread: 20-40' Fast growing pine native to a good part of the Eastent United States. Open to loosely pyramidal as a young tree and becoming gnarled and more irregular with age. Does not do well in open sites in zone 3. Full sun to partial shade. Page 45 Height: 50-60' Foliage: Dark green, felty white beneath Spread: 40-50' Fall Foliage: Yellow-brown to red Shape: Narrow, rounded, open Zone: 4-8 Excellent in both wet and upland soils, this tree has a coarser, less deeply incised leaf than Quercus alba, and acorns borne on 24" stalks. It shows good transplant success. Named a 1999 "Great Plants for the Great Plains" Award winner. Page 46 PL r -tr- r i. ter' • }�^^- - - f_ , u - _ -rys 1 der t .. r ,,� �: • s � .+.fie r �S _ -� L� � • r• - _ fJ � it y. ^n�.r-, ... ' �:. _ - f y -��• -. ",�" ^. LARIX - LARCH Larix laricina 0 American Larch ltIr -- mo .4I1li 1 -0 WWW.LANDAR(IN(.COM 4 E � F J� allsli'l - -I:; J.. WWW. LAN DAR CINC. COM i I MI ■1 - 1 ' M I I 11 " MIN FOW I j I 1 ■ � �t � -�= I I I I a 4 C1 IJ AdL �i Alk A& 1 -r J V L� om • J ROMW =: AV- • - W d NO& Adr lip,■ AV _0 000 00 �� _ `_'�^�-STNS. ►."�.` "�� N�_ •. - . f��4�. �"-�'+„� _a _ T e_':.' �y . . _ �. (�` �'--N•~' 'n 3-'r ..- .. _ •tom - ,..� ; - tiY� YG�.�- . _. � •. :.V 4�• 1� 'yt4 ':A��'��-.�..� y�A -. W:-. � .l�r.� %4 �l.'G x`. -1 Y.�. .J '� _r. --r A L C H E M Y o 0 w WWW.LANDAR(IN(.COM 1p 14 �I u I� ��I 1p 14 �I WWW.LANDAR(IN(.COM a� � t i r I 7 X4. MIN09-0 ��M A L C H E M Y o 0 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 551.452.1850 phone I 651.452.8940 fax www.mendc)ta-helghts.com CITY OF MENDDTA HEIGHTS Request for Planning Commission Action MEETING DATE: February 28, 2017 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP Interim Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2016-43 Domestic Chicken Ordinance COMMENT: Introduction The item is a revised draft ordinance allowing domestic chickens, for Planning Commission review. Background The City Council asked the Planning Commission to prepare an ordinance to allow keeping domestic chickens in residential neighborhoods in Mendota Heights. The Planning Commission discussed a draft ordinance at their January 24, 2017 meeting and provided guidance for revisions. The attached revised draft code amendment addresses these suggested changes. Discussion Minutes of the January Planning Commission meeting include the following direction: The Commissioner then went through the proposed ordinance section -by -section and provided direction to staff of their recommended edits (which motion was approved): Section 5-3-10: Add some enforcement capacity to the warden to be the same or similar to the zoning enforcement officer Section 12-113-2: no changes were proposed Section 12 -1D -3C o The run — the run should have a `minimum' of five square feet per chicken o The height should be the typical standard rise and run if the eave height is seven feet o The lot setbacks should be 10 feet from the side yard lot line and 10 feet from the rear yard lot line o Construction of and materials used must be adequate to prevent access by rodents [substitute a different term to encompass other animals and rodents] o Remove the reference to screening o Under Fecal Waste or Litter: remove "or composted provided the method used and the location does not present a public nuisance or health issue" o Add language that any accessory structure erected after the issuance of this bylaw shall not be used for the purposes of a chicken coops o Add language allowing for the revocation of the permit Page 56 Attached are draft ordinances both in a "clean" format and another with comments on the side to see the rationale or explanation for each section. All type that is red underlined is new since the last draft the Planning Commission reviewed. One item in this revised draft is the permitted height of a chicken coop. The Commission asked us to research typical accessory building height to arrive at a reasonable standard. There are some sample graphics at the end of the code drafts showing a typical 10 -foot tall shed, which is the recommended standard. Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission discuss the revised draft ordinance and make a recommendation to the City Council, or carry it over for further discussion at a future Planning Commission meeting. Action Required This matter requires a simple majority vote. Page 57 Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 The City Code is hereby amended as follows: Section 5-3 of the City Code is hereby amended by changing the name of the section as follows: Chapter 3 Domestic Animals Section 0-1 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding the following definition: Commented [PC1]: Section 5-3 is currently `Dogs & Cats" CHICKEN: A fowl of the genus Gallus and species Gallus domesticus that is commonly referred to Commented [Pcz]: this is the standard term to clearly as domesticated fowl. define what we mean by domestic chickens Section 5-3-713 of the City Code is hereby amended as follows: B. Enforcement Officials Designated; Powers: The city council shall designate the animal warden and may, if it so determines, appoint such additional persons as it may deem necessary to aid and assist the animal warden in the performance of his/her duties hereunder. All references to the animal warden in this chapter shall be deemed to include such assistants. Such persons and the police officers of the city are authorized to cite owners of dogs or other animals For violations of this chapter Commented [PC3]: Adds enforcement authority to the in addition to their authority to impound dogs as prescribed by subsection C1 of this section. Animal warden for chickens, not just dogs Section 5-3 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding a new sub -section 5-3-10 as follows and renumbering the subsequent sub -sections: 5-3-10: CHICKENS A. Up to four femald chickens. Gallus gallus domesticus, may bg kept on a residential premise Commented [PC4]: In the Domestic Animal section we as domestic animals, provided such chickens are kept in an accessory structure meeting clarify that chickens are allowed and refer to the zoning the provisions of Section 12-1 D-3 of the Zoning Code. Such structure must be constructed Code for detailed standards so that it may be easily cleaned, and so that the chickens are completely enclosed and protected from children and animals on the outside. B. The 6nimall Warden has the authority to enter upon private premises whenever there is a Commented [PC5]: Gives the Animal warden authority to reasonable cause to believe that the chickens are being mistreated or pose a threat to the inspect if necessary health and safety of people or other animals. 5-3411: EXEMPTIONS FROM PROVISIONS: - Commented [PC6]: Simply renumbering existing sections that are moved down the list Hospitals, clinics and other premises operated by licensed veterinarians exclusively for the care and treatment of animals are exempt from the provisions of this chapter except where such duties are expressly stated. (Ord. 331, 5-18-1999) 5-3-12: PENALTY: Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction therefor, be punishable as provided in section 1-4-1 of this code. (Ord. 331, 5-18-1999; amd. 2003 Code) Section 12-1 B-2 Dem is hereby amended to add the following definitions: Commented [Poe: Adding definitions in the zoning code that relate to chickens Page 58 Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 ANIMALS, DOMESTIC: Dogs, cats, birds and other common domestic household pets including female chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) kept for purposes of companionship or egg production for household use only. CHICKEN COOP: Any structure used for the housing of chickens. CHICKEN RUN: A fenced outdoor area for the keeping and exercising of chickens. ROOSTER: A male chicken. Section 12-1 D -3C (Accessory Structures In All Residential Districts is amended by adding a new paragraph 2 as follows: 2. Chicken Coops and Runs in all Residential Districts a. Number, Size and Building Requirements: Commented [PC8]: Adding to the regulations under Accessory Structures in the Zoning Code (1) One chicken coop and run may be constructed with the issuance of a perrnN as stipulated In Commented [PC9]: Permit requirements in section b(10) this Title. further down (2) The dimensions of such coop and run are limited to: area of one hundred and forty-four (144) square feet. than ten (10) feet tall. (3) Construction reauirements for the chicken coop and run include: Commented [PC10]: Many cities require 2 sq ft per chicken Commented [PC11]: Clarification per PC direction Commented [PC12]: Similarly, we require 5 sq ft per chicken for the run Commented [PC13]: Ten feet is a reasonable height to allow typical storage sheds as chicken coops- see attached graphics Commented [PC14]: Clarifies that a storage shed taller than 10 feet may not be converted in whole or in part to a chicken coop, per PC direction. Commented [PC15]: Side setback supersedes standard 5 - foot setback for other accessory structures Commented [PC16]: Ten -foot setback both side and rear (A) The exterior finish materials of the chicken coop shall be: (i) weather -resistant, protective per PC direction covering material, decay -resistant wood, or if exterior finish wood is not decay resistant, then Commented [PC17]: (tear or side yard only the wood finish shall be protected from the elements and decay by paint or protective covering (e.q., sidina, fascia wrap): and (ii) in accordance with the accessory structure regulations set forth in the zonina reaulations in this Code. (C) The construction of and materials used for the chicken coop and run must be adequate to prevent access by rodents or other pests. Commented [PC18]: Added language per PC direction Page 59 Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 (D) The chicken run shall be attached to the chicken coop. The chicken coop and run shall be deemed as a single structure and subject to the accessory structure regulations set forth in the zoning regulations of this Code. (E) The chicken run shall be fully enclosed (sides and top) by fencing or other similar material. (G) Ie..rppmmnn lea the nonn and Fun 's .eau'Fed as .,e. SeGtmo , 12 44 a of th*8 Code Commented [PC19]: Screening removed per PC direction. b. IRegulationsl: The keeping, harboring, maintaining, or possessing of any chicken shall be in Commented [PC20]: standards as we unPCouncil accordance with the following: discussion from the Planning Commission a (1) No more than four chickens shall be kept or harbored on the premises to which the permit applies. (2) Roosters are prohibited. (3) Slaughtering of chickens on any property zoned for residential use is prohibited. (4) No chicken eggs shall be sold or offered for sale; all chicken eggs shall be for personal use or consumption. (5) Chickens shall not be raised or kept for fighting. (6) Food materials stored outside shall be within closed containers with lids. (7) All containment areas and structures shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odor -free environment and shall be free from the presence of rodents or other 1pests �-�at all times. _ Commented [PC21]: Clarifies intent per PC direction. (8) Fecal waste or litter shall be removed at such reasonable times to prevent odors from Uaruaue Commented [PC22]: Composting deleted per PC Ith r hea.— is direction (9) Chickens shall not be kept in such a manner as to constitute a public nuisance. Any violation of the provisions of this subdivision shall be deemed a public nuisance. (10)Any chicken coop and run authorized under this section may be Inspected 6t any reasonable Commented [PC23]: ,allows inspection time by the City Zoning Administraror, Animal Warden or their designee. clerk upon an application form furnished by the city. The permit fee, which shall be paid and filed with the permit application, shall be in an amount established by city council resolution. AApermit issued hereunder shall be for duration of one year from its date of issuance. An application for permit renewal shall be filed 60 days prior to the expiration of the current permit. The permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (A) The full name and address of the following persons: Page 60 Commented [PC24]: Permit is under the Zoning Code which means it would be processed as a zoning action, not animal control. Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 a. The applicant signed thereto; and b. The owner(s) of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept and for which the permit would apply; (B) The street address of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept; (C) The number of chickens to be kept on the premises: (D) A detailed sketch plan of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept, including the location, the dimensions and design of the coop and run, establishing compliance with the chicken coop and run specifications provided in Section 12-1 D-3; (E) A statement certifying whether the property's homeowners' association rules, if any, prohibit the keeping of chickens on the property for which the application is sought; (F) If the applicant is not the fee owner of the premises on which the chickens are sought to be kept and for which the permit would apply, the application shall be signed by all fee owners of the premises. (G) Any other and further information as the city deems necessary. or Animal Warden with a finding in writing to the applicant that a violation of any of these standards has occurred or that there is a threat to public health, safety or welfare. Such revocation may be appealed to the City Council, whose decision shall be final. Section 12-1 D -3C.2 is amended by renumbering it to paragraph 3 and amending sub- paragraph 2 as follows: 3. Accessory structures (other than detached, private garages) in all residential districts: (2) Property is four (4) acres or less': One accessory structure with the area not to exceed one hundred forty four (144) square feet, or one kcessor� structure plus a chicken coop and run provided the total of both structures shall not exceed one hundred forty-four (144) square feet. Section 12-1 E -3C �ccessory uses in hereby amended to add the following conditional use: Keeping of chickens for noncommercial purposes, as regulated in Section 5-3-10 and in Section 12-1 D-3 of this code Page 61 Commented [PC25]: Revocation language added per PC direction Formatted: Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 10 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25' + Indent at: 0.52" Commented [PC26]: Clarifies that a person might have a storage shed plus a chicken coop and run, but the total area must stay under 144 scl ft. It seemed unreasonable to allow either a storage shed or a chicken coop/run. Commented [PC27]: Adds keeping od domestic chickens under the list of permitted Accessory Uses in the Zoning Code Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 The City Code is hereby amended as follows: Section 5-3 of the City Code is hereby amended by changing the name of the section as follows: Chapter 3 Domestic Animals Section 5-3-1 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding the following definition: CHICKEN: A fowl of the genus Gallus and species Gallus domesticus that is commonly referred to as domesticated fowl. Section 5-3-7113 of the City Code is hereby amended as follows: B. Enforcement Officials Designated; Powers: The city council shall designate the animal warden and may, if it so determines, appoint such additional persons as it may deem necessary to aid and assist the animal warden in the performance of his/her duties hereunder. All references to the animal warden in this chapter shall be deemed to include such assistants. Such persons and the police officers of the city are authorized to cite owners of dogs or other animals for violations of this chapter in addition to their authority to impound dogs as prescribed by subsection C1 of this section. Section 5-3 of the City Code is hereby amended by adding a new sub -section 5-3-10 as follows and renumbering the subsequent sub -sections: 5-3-10: CHICKENS A. Up to four female chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus, may be kept on a residential premise as domestic animals, provided such chickens are kept in an accessory structure meeting the provisions of Section 12-1 D-3 of the Zoning Code. Such structure must be constructed so that it may be easily cleaned, and so that the chickens are completely enclosed and protected from children and animals on the outside. B. The Animal Warden has the authority to enter upon private premises whenever there is a reasonable cause to believe that the chickens are being mistreated or pose a threat to the health and safety of people or other animals. 5-3-11: EXEMPTIONS FROM PROVISIONS: Hospitals, clinics and other premises operated by licensed veterinarians exclusively for the care and treatment of animals are exempt from the provisions of this chapter except where such duties are expressly stated. (Ord. 331, 5-18-1999) 5-3-12: PENALTY: Any person violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction therefor, be punishable as provided in section 1-4-1 of this code. (Ord. 331, 5-18-1999; amd. 2003 Code) Section 12-1 B-2 Definitions is hereby amended to add the following definitions: Page 62 Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 ANIMALS, DOMESTIC: Dogs, cats, birds and other common domestic household pets including female chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) kept for purposes of companionship or egg production for household use onlv. CHICKEN COOP: Any structure used for the housing of chickens. CHICKEN RUN: A fenced outdoor area for the keeping and exercising of chickens. ROOSTER: A male chicken. Section 12 -1D -3C Accessory Structures In All Residential Districts is amended by adding a new paragraph 2 as follows: 2. Chicken Coops and Runs in all Residential Districts a. Number. Size and Buildina Reauirements: (1) One chicken coop and run may be constructed with the issuance of a permit as stipulated in this Title. (2) The dimensions of such coop and run are limited to: (A) The interior floor space of the chicken coop shall be a minimum size of two (2) square feet for each chicken authorized under the permit. The floor area of the run must behave a minimum of five (5) square feet per chicken. The coop and run must not exceed a maximum area of one hundred and forty-four (144) square feet. (B) The coop and run are limited to a maximum height of Viten (10) feet tall, whether the accessory structure is for sole use as a chicken coop or if it is part of an accessory structure also used for other purposes. The chicken coop portion of such a structure may be no more than ten (10) feet tall. (C) The coop and run must be set back 10 feet from the side and rear lot lines of the property and thirty (30) foot from the roar lot lino of the property. The coop and run must be located in the rear or side yard and are not permitted in the front yard of the property. (3) Construction requirements for the chicken coop and run include: (A) The exterior finish materials of the chicken coop shall be: (i) weather -resistant, protective covering material, decay -resistant wood, or if exterior finish wood is not decay resistant, then the wood finish shall be protected from the elements and decay by paint or protective covering (e.g., siding, fascia wrap); and (ii) in accordance with the accessory structure regulations set forth in the zoning regulations in this Code. (C) The construction of and materials used for the chicken coop and run must be adequate to prevent access by rodents or other pests. Page 63 Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 (D) The chicken run shall be attached to the chicken coop. The chicken coop and run shall be deemed as a single structure and subject to the accessory structure regulations set forth in the zoning regulations of this Code. (E) The chicken run shall be fully enclosed (sides and top) by fencing or other similar material. b. Regulations: The keeping, harboring, maintaining, or possessing of any chicken shall be in accordance with the following: (1) No more than four chickens shall be kept or harbored on the premises to which the permit applies. (2) Roosters are prohibited. (3) Slaughtering of chickens on any property zoned for residential use is prohibited. (4) No chicken eggs shall be sold or offered for sale: all chicken eggs shall be for personal use or consumption. (5) Chickens shall not be raised or kept for fighting. (6) Food materials stored outside shall be within closed containers with lids. (7) All containment areas and structures shall be maintained in a clean, sanitary, and odor -free environment and shall be free from the presence of rodents or other pests venTvn-at all times. (8) Fecal waste or litter shall be removed at such reasonable times to prevent odors from emitting over property lines. Such waste or litter must be double bagged and disposed of in city garbage Gr GOMposted provided the methed used and the Iona+len rhes not present a n hlin niica nne or health issue (9) Chickens shall not be kept in such a manner as to constitute a public nuisance. Any violation of the provisions of this subdivision shall be deemed a Dublic nuisance. (10)Any chicken coop and run authorized under this section may be inspected at any reasonable time by the City Zoning Administraror, Animal Warden or their designee. {4 (11) Permit Required: An application for a permit hereunder shall be filed with the city clerk upon an application form furnished by the city. The permit fee, which shall be paid and filed with the permit application, shall be in an amount established by city council resolution. A permit issued hereunder shall be for duration of one year from its date of issuance. An application for permit renewal shall be filed 60 days prior to the expiration of the current permit. The permit application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (A) The full name and address of the following persons: Page 64 Mendota Heights Draft Ordinance Re: Domestic Chickens REVISED February 28, 2017 4 a. The applicant signed thereto; and b. The owner(s) of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept and for which the permit would apply; (B) The street address of the premises on which chickens are sought to be ke (C) The number of chickens to be kept on the premises; (D) A detailed sketch plan of the premises on which chickens are sought to be kept, including the location, the dimensions and design of the coop and run, establishing compliance with the chicken coop and run specifications provided in Section 12-1 D-3; (E) A statement certifying whether the property's homeowners' association rules, if any, prohibit the keeping of chickens on the property for which the application is sought; (F) If the applicant is not the fee owner of the premises on which the chickens are sought to be kept and for which the permit would apply, the application shall be signed bV all fee owners of the premises. (G) Any other and further information as the city deems necessary. 44-)(12) A permit granted under this section of the code may be revoked by the Zoning Administrator or Animal Warden with a finding in writing to the applicant that a violation of any of these standards has occurred or that there is a threat to public health, safety or welfare. Such revocation may be aDDealed to the Citv Council. whose decision shall be final. Section 12-1 D -3C.2 is amended by renumbering it to paragraph 3 and amending sub- paragraph 2 as follows: 3. Accessory structures (other than detached, private garages) in all residential districts: (2) Property is four (4) acres or less*: One accessory structure with the area not to exceed one hundred forty four (144) square feet, or one accessory structure plus a chicken coop and run provided the total of both structures shall not exceed one hundred forty-four (144) square feet. Section 12-1 E -3C Accessory Uses in hereby amended to add the following conditional use: Keeping of chickens for noncommercial purposes, as regulated in Section 5-3-10 and in Section 12-1 D-3 of this code Page 65 Rubbermaid Roughneck Storage Shed (Common: 7 - ft x 7 -ft; Actual Interior Dimensions: 6.7 -ft x 6.9 -ft) [Tom #551'25 Mode l#5887553 *****)269 Reviews) Dutdoor Living Today Gable Cedar Storage Shed (Common: 9 -ft x 6 -ft; Interior Dimensions: 8.66 -ft x 6.30 -ft) ttem#3348[)6 Model #CB96 jA* j� NO reviews Sheds Suncast Tremont Gable Storage Shed (Common: 8 - ft x 10 -ft; Actual Interior Dimensions: 7.9 -ft x 9.9 -ft) ttem#6445:5 Model# BM58;00 ***** (1 Review) r Y Heartland Estate Gambrel Engineered Wood Storage Shed {Common: 10 -ft x 12 -ft; Interior Dimensions: 10 -ft x 12 -ft} Kern # 3 360 56 Model # 191008 n F7 ■ D i ***** l6 Reviews) Page 66 Heartland Hillsdale Gable Engineered Wood Storage Shed (Common: 10 -ft x 12 -ft; Interior Dimensions: 10 -ft x 12-f0 ttem#703661 Model# "9...4 No reviews Heartland Liberty Gable Engineered Wood Storage Shed (Common: 10 -ft x 8 -ft; Interior Dimensions: 10 -ft x 7.71 -ft) Item 0441199 Model# 134581 No reviews Typical Shed - 10' W x 12'D x 10' H Page 67 16*ti 101-091 0'-0" 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone I 651.452.8940 fax www.mendc)ta-helghts.com CITY OF MENDDTA HEIGHTS Request for Planning Commission Action MEETING DATE: February 28, 2017 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Phil Carlson, AICP Interim Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2017-03 Conditional Use Permit Holy Family Maronite Church, 1960 Lexington Avenue COMMENT: Introduction The application is for a Conditional Use Permit for modest additions to the existing church building. Background Churches are a conditional use in the R-1 district. The church wishes to add to the building on two sides. Discussion The City is using its quasi-judicial authority when considering action on zoning requests and has limited discretion; a determination regarding whether or not the request meets the applicable code standards is required. Recommendation Staff recommends the Planning Commission discuss the requests in this case and make a recommendation to the City Council. Action Required This matter requires a simple majority vote. Page 68 (3 Stantec Item No. 2017-03 MEMORANDUM Date: February 28, 2017 To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission From: Phil Carlson, AICP, Consulting Planner RE: Planning Case 2017-03: Holy Family Maronite Church Addition, Conditional Use Permit 1960 Lexington Avenue Request for CUP in an R-1 zoning district to construct an addition to the existing church building Action: Approve and determine conditions of approval Deadline: April 8, 2017 (60 days from complete application submittal) Introduction The Holy Family Maronite Church is seeking approval for a Conditional Use Permit to construct modest additions to their building and minor site modifications at 1960 Lexington Avenue in the R-1 Zoning District. Churches are a conditional use in the R-1 District. Section 12-1 L-6 of the Zoning Code describes the purpose of the Conditional Use designation: [T]here are special or conditional uses which, because of their unique characteristics, cannot be properly classified in any district or districts without consideration, in each case, of the impact of those uses on neighboring land or the public need for the particular location. From Section 12-1 E-313 of the Zoning Code, list of Conditional Uses in the R-1 District: Religious institutions and places of religious worship, including those related structures located on the some site which are an integral part of the principal use, convent or homes for persons related to a religious function on the same site, provided no more than ten (10) persons shall reside on the site, and no building shall be located within fifty feet (50) of any lot line of abutting private property in an R district. Page 69 (3 Stantec Mendota Heights Planning Commission Item 2017-03 Holy Family Church Addition CUP February 28, 2017 2 Project Description The existing church building sits on the west side of a large lot at the corner of Lexington Avenue and Victoria Road, fronting Highway 1 10. The applicant proposes two small additions totaling 3,750 square feet on the west side and southeast corner of the building, as illustrated below. The additions will add space to the fellowship hall, kitchen, and storage, and will add a sacristy, classroom, restrooms, and two offices. There is no change to the main nave or sanctuary space. The new additions meet the required front setbacks to Lexington and Victoria, and are only one story high, so height limits are not an issue. -- ANALYSIS 1) The Holy Family Maronite Church is located on a busy corner at the edge of a single family neighborhood. The building is on a large lot some distance from the closest neighboring single family homes to the east and north. Given its location the use likely will not impact the character of the singe family neighborhood like a site at the interior of a neighborhood might. The small size and location of the proposed additions are also not likely to impact the neighborhood. There is no additional building space being added to the north side, closest to the nearest residential neighbor. 2) There is no residential component to the church use on this site. 3) Setbacks and height limit are met with the project. 4) There are minor modifications proposed to the parking lot, resulting in a net loss of one parking space - 88 to 87 spaces on site. Page 70 (3 Stantec Mendota Heights Planning Commission Item 2017-03 Holy Family Church Addition CUP February 28, 2017 5) Parking requirements are based on seating in the main sanctuary space. Seating capacity is 250. At the rate of 1 space per 3.5 seats required by code, the use requires 72 parking. Parking is adequate. b) Lighting is proposed at the new building entrances. These should be downcast cutoff type fixtures. 7) There is minimal additional landscaping proposed, in the form pf reestablishing turf around the building and a small infiltration area on the south side of the building. 8) Stormwater issues have been reviewed by the City Engineer per the grading, drainage and erosion control plans submitted, and he has no concerns. This will be reviewed again at the building permit stage to confirm that there will be no stormwater impacts. RECOMMENDATION We recommend approval of the conditional Use Permit for Holy Family Maronite Church as submitted with the following conditions: 1) The applicant will submit grading plans, subject to review and approval of the Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 2) The applicant will submit landscape plans, subject to review and approval by the Planning Department, as part of any building permit application. 3) All new exterior lighting will be downcast cutoff type fixtures to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. REQUESTED ACTION Following the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit based on the attached findings of fact. ME 2. Recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit based on findings of fact. OR 3. Table the request, pending additional information from staff or others. Page 71 (3 Stantec Mendota Heights Planning Commission Item 2017-03 Holy Family Church Addition CUP February 28, 2017 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit for Holy Family Church, 1960 Lexington Avenue 1. The use is existing and has been a good neighbor in this location in this zoning district for many years. 2. The existing church use is on a busy corner and not in the middle of a quiet residential area. 3. The proposed additions are modest is size and will have minimal impact on activity, traffic, noise, or other issues that might affect the neighborhood. 4. The proposed project will meet all zoning code standards for setbacks, building height and number of parking stalls. 5. The proposed grading and drainage plan poses no concerns to the City Engineer. Page 72 Holy Family Maronite Church 1960 Le)angton Avenue Planning Case 2017-03 Date: 2/22/2017 I icMM_ 109Al..__. 19,� 33 Lu Q Z O H C� Z X Lu J 1101 t City of Mendota 1!!!!Siiii = JA Heights SCALE IN FEET I 4 52 VICTORIA RD S 74 \1 i' D kola Cou,.,ty GIS GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www. mendota-heights.com 71 qpp� miCITY OF MENOOTA HEIGHTS Office Use Only: Case #: ` C7 PLANNING APPLICATION CC Fee Paid: I , 4 0o _�_ Application Date: (' 3 I - 1-7 Staff Initials: V Applicable Ordinance #: Section: Existing Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Existing Use: Proposed Use: Property Address/Street Location: 1960 Lexington Ave S Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Applicant Name: RRTL Architects Phone: 651-291-1116 Applicant E -Mail Address: crafferty@rrtlarchitects.com Applicant Mailing Address: 278 East 7th St St Paul, MN 55101 Property Owner Name: Holy Family Maronite Church Phone: 651-291-1116 Property Owner Mailing Address: 1960 Lexington Ave S Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Type of Request: ❑ Rezoning 0 Conditional Use Permit ❑ Interim Use Permit ❑ Variance ❑ Wetlands Permit ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Lot Split/Adjustment ❑ Critical Area Permit ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Code Amendment ❑ Appeal ❑ Other hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during daylight hours. le:. / X17 Signature of Applicont �- Date Signature of Owner Date Signature of Owner (if more than one) Date Planning Application (modified 6/1/2016) Page 74 Page 1 of 1 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MSV 55118 651,452.1850 phone I 651.452.6940 fax ww w.m en d ata- hei g h ts.com 41 mj CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: Office Use Only: Case #: Applicant: /_rererm • Electronic and hard copies of all the required materials must be submitted according to the current application submittal schedule. • Submit 1 electronic copy and 2 hard copies (full-size/to-scale) of all required plans. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: 0 Fee, as included in current Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights). NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required to complete the project. id Completed Application Form(s). 0 Letter of Intent. 0 Required Plans. APPLICANT MUST CHECK ALL APPLICABLE ITEMS INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL Site Development Plan: id Location of all buildings, including existing and proposed. 0 Location of all adjacent buildings located within 350' of the exterior boundaries of the property in question. 0 Floor area ratio. 0 Location and number of existing and proposed parking spaces. 0 Vehicular circulation. O Architectural elevations (type and materials used on all external surfaces). id Sewer and water alignment, existing and proposed. 0 Location and candle power of all luminaries. id Location of all existing easements. Conditional Use Permit Application (modified 4/5/2016) Page 1 of 2 Page 75 Dimension Plan: 0 Lot dimensions and area. 0 Dimensions of proposed and existing structures. 0 "Typical" floor plan and "typical" room plan. 0 Setbacks on all structures existing or proposed on property in question. 0 Proposed setbacks. Grading Plan: 0 Existing contour. 0 Proposed grading elevations. 0 Drainage configuration. 0 Storm sewer catch basins and invert elevations. 0 Spot elevations. ❑ Proposed road profile. Landscape Plan: id Location of all existing trees, type, diameter and which trees will be removed. 0 Location, type and diameter of all proposed plantings. ❑ Location and material used of all screening devices. NOTES: Conditional Use Permit Application (modified 4/5/2016) Page 2 of 2 Page 76 January 30, 2017 Phil Carlson, City Planner City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Conditional Use Permit application for Holy Family Maronite Church Dear Mr. Carlson, Enclosed are the materials related to the Conditional Use Permit application for the proposed addition to Holy Family Maronite Church. The project has developed out of a need to expand the facilities at the church so that their activities can continue to grow and flourish. This modest expansion of their facilities allows for two offices to be sized for privacy for administration and counseling. It also allows for properly sized rest rooms that will serve the members more effectively. It allows for a classroom as well as a meeting room to be added and it expands storage and the serving area for the kitchen, the heart of their community and its gatherings. The church itself remains the same with the exception of a more suitable sacristy that is being proposed as an alternate should funds be realized for its inclusion. These elements are tied into the existing structure as simply and as minimally disruptive as possible in order to leave the congregation functioning during a brief five month construction period that is target to start in April of 2017. This submittal for the CUP ties all of these items with site development plan requirements: the existing site survey, the proposed site and building plan, the topographic as well as building elevations, and the calculations related to the site and other required materials including site disturbance. Fees are included as well. Our conversations with the City have suggested that we will not need to request any variances. The project is very important for Holy Family Church; they are proud to be direct neighbors with City Hall and are earnest in their desire to be good neighbors for the community. Sincerely, RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. Craig Rafferty, FAIA xc: File RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS 278 EAST 7TH STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2349 TEL: 651 224-4831 FAX: 651 228-0264 www.rrtldrehitects.com ■ G:\1603-02 Holy Family Maronite Church -Phase 1\01 -Pre Construction Files\03 - CorrespFr@6Abd7l17etters\2016 01-30 Clty Planner -CUP Application.doc Page 1 of 1 February 8t", 2017 Phil Carlson, City Planner City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: Conditional Use Permit application for Holy Family Maronite Church Dear Mr. Carlson, Enclosed are the materials to update our Conditional Use Permit application for the proposed addition to Holy Family Maronite Church. The update includes an addition along the west fagade that pushes out 8 feet further than the existing Fellowship Hall exterior wall. This addition assists the church in expanding their Fellowship Hall, their serving area, and a sacristy. The project is very important for Holy Family Church; they are proud to be direct neighbors with City Hall and are earnest in their desire to be good neighbors for the community. Thank you for allowing modifications to our original CUP application. Sincerely, RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. Craig Rafferty, FAIA xc: File Page 78 MEMORANDUM TO: Krista Nebraska FROM: Larry Wacker PROJECT: Holy Family Maronite Church Expansion SUBJECT: Site design information for CUP Application DATE: January 31, 2017 CC: Enclosed please find drawings and information for site improvements proposed as part of the building expansion project at Holy Family Maronite Church. The package is a submittal for review by the City as part of a CUP application for the project. The primary design goals for site improvements include: • Provide walk access to proposed building entries. • Comply with ADA requirements for parking and walk areas. • Adjust grades in the building expansion areas to provide positive drainage away from the building, walks and parking areas. • Use native plantings to aid in treating storm water run-off from paved surfaces. The enclosed drawings include the following: 1. C1-1 —Existing Conditions 2. C1-2 — Demolition Plan 3. C2-1 - Site Plan 4. C3-1 — Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan 5. C8-1 — Civil Details 6. L1-1 - Landscape Plan PARKING The total number of existing, standard parking stalls on the church site is 88 and existing ADA stalls is 4. The total number of stalls required by ordinance is 66, based on the sanctuary seating capacity of 250. The number of standard stalls on the site will be reduced to 87 and the number of ADA parking stalls will remain unchanged. Page 79 SITE LIGHTING Light fixtures will be installed on exterior building walls at proposed entry locations. EXISTING TREES One, 16" caliper flowering crab and one 4" caliper green ash will be removed but all other existing trees on the site will be retained and protected during construction. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The total area disturbed by construction will not exceed 5,663 sq.ft. or 0.13 acres (see Sheet C2-1). The total amount of existing impervious surfacing within the disturbed area is 871 sq.ft. and the total amount of impervious surfacing added in the disturbed area will be 3,920 sq.ft. Storm water run-off from the roof and drive on the east side of the building expansion will be directed to a swale planted with native fortis and grasses as shown on Sheet Ll -l. The storm water will pass through the native planting area prior to entering a City catch basin located at the southwest corner of the church property. Please contact Larry Wacker at 763-496-6782 or lwacker e loucksassociates.com with questions regarding proposed site work. Page 80 1/31/2017 Lv binq maps Notes Holy Family Maronite Church Mendota Heights MN - Bing Maps Aerial showing Holy Family Maronite Church and all adjacent buildings located within 350' of the exterior v �,Cock? U, boundaries of the property. o V ail pr V totia Ct 45 lrfctari3 Cuov VicfOria Rd S Mendota Rd W +moo Dakota or Centre ROJn,,, r N a d 8 VI Mdty h, ' Page 81 https://www.bi ng.com/maps?&ty=18&q=Holy%2OFam i ly%2OM aronite%2OChurch%20M endota%2OHeights%20M N &ss=ypid.YN 873x14774830887104746325&... 1/1 50 L E X N G T 01 N DIGDTAXD W E S T% I ► 33 � I I l p 0 I I / 1 STMH I Lot I I ,�� Lot 2 I Lot J -N. Line of the S. 693 feet of the SWI14 / RIM=s -.2a of I the NWIA Sec. 26, T. 28, R. 23 Block l INV=897.50-N,E 18"C 2 9/ 24"CO �' CB V / o INV=90. S // i- 18"c0 V 9/0- / 1 - /9//- RIMA 88 ' I 2a"ca 9/2 ism Is"co / _ _ 58+12�� 378.00- - 1Nv-ssss2- , - Fnd. So /d lP. N ' rw. 8" 0 -� INV=80533-S - -- - 1 02 o 1� eon . 8 / 9/3 - - ap073 - -� - - « 12"RCS - - -9/2 �< I '� 15"RCP \ 6-P L - �'6 I 8"PI ,,"P P ka� P 6"P 8"PI 10"P 2 PI 4''P112' PEL 2 8"Pa"EL RIM=907.94 g°� SMH$ � 9� 8"E 18"P 8 PIS 8' PI < SMH 5 // / <- CB CB - 12' II P1+, < 12 MH ¢MH go INV=892.89-N, 0g �_ - J! O\ I g\ RIM -912.36 \ \ I a _ RIM=910.07 Cap#9235 = 9 / RIM -912.06 RIM -912.08 / - INV=898.67 - - - - / INV=.K8.b& - - -1NV=908.73 INV_893.61_E - - - _ t� / 1 RIM=912.06 - - BIT. EDGE- 130" 0 I°\ i�\\ 11 V=900.11 -a- -I--t----------------- ,-------+ (14 F I B I T U M I N 0 U S� _ Easement for Drainage & Public Ut�ty -'' \\ j 1 2"FR 6 Iq purpsper Do 2/ 1 I sFa Oti 1 g oselec. No. 543966 / 1� 33 50 �I g\ g\\ � o\� i _ 9/,3 - _ ----- ------ ---- 1 ` -913 � \ co \`-Easement for Ingress & E ress---' o�` \\ \ 18"MA .g15 -r- L 9v� rposes per Doc. o. _ v� - l a 'O I I 0 KD \ 20"AS\ / / I I \ 1 \ / I I N 14.0 \ I *12S r 10 1 /QO \ tis It" In / _ "\ -9j4� \ i I -Story Vaulted Churchcp II14Se Brick Siding *10"AsN-47.1*/-- \5aA RDm � 0 RD I �A//�O A �co Zt 10"AS - / /SP � RDSMH / e /\2��AR / RIM=911.26 16 CA / // I I J O INV=895.46 w \ B RD u� c , RIM=9 1 49 06 N \g \5. / N 1 v a O I (INV=9p3.99-N N ao \1 g d 916 / 9 yy'•(� d / INV= 05.19-S d ui\� °Cfl g O )r(° ° ° a / / _ ° _ (4,\\4 (� i I INV=X906.14-W v I 5 2_ /17.9 8.9 CN 256 N ci N o III I I -Story Church / -91 ai a� ro wa 24"MA E o w ' Lap & Stone Siding CIO. -AS -- --- -aQ� \ m / G �-\G\6 g5 Lou o / ' Doc' / 9 m e a, �I 1 �- - 52.5% --- - 4.3 9v5' ent P 1� d ° "AR reem I I 'AR / wF' 4"CIP I -IN V= 03.32 \6/ °d TNSD� D 916 9\66orkin92021 / \$/ �\ I2"J gyp( S S S PER LAN a 9 - 9/6 i No. d 7.1- '\C .1 �9 q I 2"AR ° 4.3 [8"Pl RD RD to"AS � / / � I \16 `9/191,>> - i / R �a N \ m I I 24.1 1•� c�0 w I I Q) C4 N "' - 916- - i / V9�g lo' As Lo J QL 2"SER. 24.5 p � w Rp\� 9\ 0 O GP -/--- w 0 A IAS r GASN w ------- 3�3 r --- tr- - - - - - - _ --- 4 MA STM O 26"AS w 32"AS II / 915 RIM 9g =.8 Un \ 5 I ° i BRICK FIREPIT I $ ° __50.15 u- /9 g _ v=907.ba- N8 / S8� °58'12 "E\� 1=sos.7s- - I v=sos.2s- � 50. l5 I \ (�' g!�'\61 I B FLOW I = BIT. EDGE -� 39,¢2 ,-S. Line of the N. 275.58 feet ID RIM= I o,� / 112"SP _ 4\b g2° G g / of the S. 417.42 feet of the w / INV=908.17-SUMP I t O g� °6 i a s op INV=911.17-sE I I / i h 6 ��.� TRAs �� °v� SWl�4 of the NWl�4 ' 0�N� II TRASH ENCLOSURE / / 92001 9b� 9\9 ENCLOSURE / /3- \ \ OH OH OH -- ---�-------- � - � ------ �------- - ----.--- - - 0 \6 a O TEL �- - - - 7 - 9 O 9 G G6g6 EL `" TEL 6 / �� FnOi O/�i P --9,L\6 \\ S 2 N \ 2"DIP car _ tl J I \ I BITt,MINous � 4 6o co � / 1 v6 f � o 9\1 Z p A FC \3 ¢ 1 O 9\6. N 91OOQii \ C� RIM 916.29 7- --N'ly R/W Line per Final Certificate e2�� 26.3 INV=911.75-NW TFC �� /� - \ �0 0 0 Aw=912.70-S 15 Doc. No. 360690 a) Q m \1 A e\ B I a o 9 ° SMH ^ w RIM=917.98 INV=898.98�4\ ASO FC 1 G 2� X N �5°aU > 0 r�00 _ /� O/p rmy 922 0 u' v 9/9- T 1 26.3 �V' A \ \ I 92 % 922 6"M - 1 \ J � C \ 1 \ ' 02 Q �Q,� \ 8"CO // / \ n\ o cc IC O O z I M N N c a� C4 0 �:z c o 3� 0 ZV (b c odCza I 0 o L° 3 0 0 (0O2 1 I / G Pi \ Z ��S j 6"COO . / \ w 922- \ O m L� , 6" 0 �n s O, _ 8"c0 a„M� s9'66' 0 \/ \ Ar • d• �a CO 924 -c \O� C, o'C 929 1 c \� 925.4 p • 926 ❑T �� o �i �dt d 190 0 r 0d�OJi *70 o� 4 %yp1' 6q G 9° TFC \ G 4 \ 1) e qs TFc \ 92 rFL � Rights, Access Restrictions & Easement for Trunk\ rF� \ Highway purposes per Misc. Record No. 61, Pg. 504-_d\\ \ a \`\ a \ A A �p 0 ® CATCH BASIN TEL STORM MANHOLE O SANITARY MANHOLE Y HYDRANT M GATE VALVE T CURB STOP RD, ROOF DRAIN ❑A A/C UNIT © CABLE TV PEDESTAL ❑H HAND HOLE ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL LIGHT POLE 0 POWER POLE UNDERGROUND GAS GUY WIRE �S YARD LIGHT QE ELECTRIC METER © GAS METER o GUARD POST -� SIGN H MAILBOX 0"0 FLAG POLE Page 82 0 30 60 N SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND - EXISTING CONDITIONS )> STORM SEWER TEL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE > SANITARY SEWER FO FIBER OPTIC WATERMAIN OH OVERHEAD UTILITY S SANITARY SEWER SERVICE X- CHAIN LINK FENCE W WATER SERVICE RETAINING WALL GAS UNDERGROUND GAS CONCRETE CURB CONIFEROUS TREE CONCRETE CONTOUR DECIDUOUS TREE ,916.5 SPOT ELEVATION TW TOP WALL AR ARBORVITAE BW BOTTOM WALL PI PINE TC TOP CURB SP SPRUCE AS ASH CC CURB CUT CA CATULPA B12 R/W BOUNDARY CORNER PER MNDOT R/W PLAT NO. 19-91387 CO COTTONWOOD EL ELM FR MISC FRUIT MA MAPLE PO POPLAR CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 IN TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX 1�): MH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. 17001.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55 101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX co HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ENGINEER: TREVOR GRUYS, PE (DATE: 01/30/17 REG. NO.: 153706 PROJ #: � DATE: (DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE (CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET NUMBER C1-1 B12 >> » 810313 - I i\ ASH a I I I Zti� Ik J LOCUST Cl- SPRUCE ° _ J TC ° a I I . /\ I I I I A E X N G T 0 N H G0�I I R W A I I IS"72� 24"Co Js18"CO I I I lAI S � c 1a"nn IZ F', + A \TFC A �- \ \T d J 4 \ W H \a CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! �d Gopher State One Call 4 /� TF TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 d ui TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 \ d\ TF< ^ WARNING: �a n THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL << EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. \\ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT 4\ \ LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, �� \ CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE \ 4 DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. i i H L A lel D Page 83 I � Ory I I I I I I I I I I I I ° d ° o I I ` / I I I I I ASH a I I I Zti� Ik . LOCUST I I SPRUCE ° I I I TC ° a I I . a I BW BOTTOM OF WALL 8"Co 4"C0 s"co AS ASH EL ELM LO LOCUST SP SPRUCE THSD ELEV @ THRESHOLD TC TOP OF CURB CC CURB CUT TW TOP OF WALL BW BOTTOM OF WALL xe725 SPOT ELEVATION ( ) PER MAP / RECORD 0 20 40 N-%7%= SCALE IN FEET SURVEY LEGEND 00 CATCH BASIN REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING STORM MANHOLE O SANITARY MANHOLE (651) 228-0624 FAX HYDRANT N GATE VALVE 0 POWER POLE GAS LIGHT POLE E- GUY WIRE OVERHEAD UTILITY SIGN ❑E ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ❑H HAND HOLE RD❑ ROOF DRAIN Eno ELECTRIC OUTLET O FIRE CONNECTION O GUARD POST CONCRETE FLAG POLE >> STORM SEWER REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SANITARY SEWER > (651) 228-0624 FAX WATERMAIN I ELE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 2737 Fairview Ave N GAS UNDERGROUND GAS X X X X X X X X X X X X OH OVERHEAD UTILITY REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES —x—x— CHAIN LINK FENCE 0 GUARDRAIL LOUCKS ASSOCIATES METERS, SIGNS, ETC. WALL EXISTING TREES/SHRUBS (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. CONCRETE CURB LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT a CONCRETE Saint Paul, MN 55101 CONTOUR (651) 297-6817 FAX CONIFEROUS TREE O� Gp c DECIDUOUS TREE DEMOLITION LEGEND: TOLLEFSON LINDEKE REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING, (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX SIDEWALKS, ETC. �VMAN Mc OVGH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MILL AND OVERLAY EXISTING PARKING LOT 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 REMOVE EXISTING CURB &GUTTER, X X X X X X X X X X X X RETAINING WALLS, FENCE, ETC. BKBM ENGINEERS REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES Minneapolis, MN 55429 REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, POWER 0 POLES, LIGHT POLES, BOLLARDS, PARKING LOUCKS ASSOCIATES METERS, SIGNS, ETC. XREMOVE EXISTING TREES/SHRUBS SITE DEMOLITION NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. 3. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON-SITE. REFER TO GRADING PLAN FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TREE PROTECTION NOTE: INSTALL SNOW FENCE AROUND EACH TREE TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO GRADING. FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIP EDGE OR CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. FENCING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 6' TO THE TRUNK OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. THE PERIMETERS FOR TREES BEING PROTECTED SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL TREE PROTECTION AREAS THAT INSTRUCTS WORKERS TO STAY OUT. CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ALL AREAS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. SOIL SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND CHANGES IN CHEMISTRY FROM CONCRETE OR TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS FUELS AND PAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE "TREE PAINT" ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. IF AN OAK IS WOUNDED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY PAINT TO THE WOUND IN ORDER TO PREVENT OAK WILT. ALL DAMAGE TO TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTFNTI(1N (1F THF (1\A/NFR ANF( I AmngCAPF ARCHITFCT TREE PROTECTION SCALE: 1/2" =1'-011 EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN DRIP EDGE OF TREE 2" X 4" WOOD STAKE, POSITIONED AS NOTED. STRING 4' HIGH, ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING BETWEEN WOOD STAKES PLACED 5' ON CENTER AND PLACED BETWEEN TREE PROTECTION AND DISTURBED AREAS. EXISTING GRADE Tree Protection.DWG RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX �VMAN Mc OVGH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. 17001.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX SOL �p� O� Gp HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ENGINEER: TREVOR GRUYS, PE DATE: O 1/30/17 REG. NO.: 153706 PRO] #: DATE: (DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE DEMOLITION PLAN SHEET NUMBER C1-2 0 20 40 EXISTING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED L E X N G T 1 I O SANITARY MANHOLE • —�-I— N H H L A N DO STORM MANHOLE O J 1 1 ®� CATCH BASIN ® SCALE IN FEET 33 ►�� 50 1 I D CULVERT 1 1 1 HYDRANT I I I D4 GATEVALVE N LOl 1 Lot � 1 OPiv POST INDICATOR VALVE OPIv IS" 0 2 I Blo C 0 POWER POLE LIGHT POLE 0 PAVEMENT TYPES 24"CO w I � 18"co i 1 � slc" CONCRETE SIDEWALK U 24"CO I6"CO I6"CO 1 Fn d. Soid IP ��\M #3 BENCHMARK ^ °� C4 �� 8"CO 2 8"CO OM 16"CO 1Cap,8073 1 8. -SP SOIL BORINGS — 6"co �W WATER MANHOLE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT °H to"CO 2 8'P "P1 8"PI 'PI "/I 8"p 8"P l0"PI 4"PF 8 P �T TELEPHONE MANHOLE 8' PI 2"P1 10"PI 6"EL 2 8"PI 6 4"EL 4"EL �U UTILITY MANHOLE 1' �\ O 1 6'P 8'P 6,P/ \/ 1 PI O / \ ELECTRIC MANHOLE / / / / / MILL &OVERLAY EXISTING PAVEMENT N 8"EL 18'PI 8"PI 8"P1 12 PI 1 4 E 4'EL 12"SP —W� WATER SERVICE 1 Cap,9235 r1�j BIT. EDGE 30"PO — — — ° —S� SANITARY SERVICE NOTE: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — g ------------ -----------t--------- �---------- HANDICAP PARKING I SEE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ON SHEET C8-1 FOR TYPE AND DEPTH I 1B I T U M I N 0 U S 2"FR J — 246 DIRECTION OF FLOW — ' INFORMATION. 33 50 -1 1 1I 6'C X SPOT ELEVATION 1 924.6 ------------ ---------------L---------------_ —924— CONTOURS l'=?4�/ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — SITE DATA SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER DISTURBED AREA: 0.17 AC 1 >> WATERMAIN EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.03 AC (18%) 1 18 FM FORCEMAI""MA —py PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 0.10 AC (59%) O 1 20"AS » 21 DRAINTILE » DT— Iz 1 12"AS SILT FENCE CURB & GUTTER OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS — — — RETAINING WALL EXISTING PARKING = 88 STALLS TREELINE �^ EXISTING PARKING REMOVED = - 5 STALLS I _ —_ — — — _ PROPOSED PARKING = 4 STALLS I M — — — EASEMENT LINE — — — — SETBACK LINE TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 87 STALLS M1 I -Story Vaulted Church —X—XFENCE LINE X X— Q 1 14"SP Brick SidingC*110"AS TES UNDERGROUND TELE U-1 0 GAS UNDERGROUND GAS ACCESSIBLE PARKING w — off OVERHEAD UTILITY VI ADA PARKING SIGNTYP - ____25 ____ I FO— UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING: = 4 STALLS M I SEE DETAIL -INSTALL SIGN REMOVED ACCESSIBLE PARKING: = - 4 STALLS SLE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC o I - / / / I PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE PARKING: = 4 STALLS t 2' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT 1 STV UNDERGROUND CABLE TV - ° ° r,. 1 TOTAL ACCESSIBLE STALLS: = 4 STALLS z 1 i ��' MILL & OVERLAY 00 PROPERTY LINE / / J / 1 EXISTING PAVEMENT •10"AS �w 1 I TO MEET ADA SLOPE / - I Co 1 -Pt CONIFEROUS TREE \\ 2"AR REQUIREMENTS. / / PROPOSED O // DECIDUOUS TREE M I BUILDING `� ,' �, / / IOc ADDITION �- - - - - - - ° ° � / k I PARKING COUNTS FFE=916.17 U CONCRETE STOOP ° ° / 2(Y /I COORDINATE W/ ° ° ° ° a --- -- �- `� ° ARCHITECTURAL & p ° a a° STRUCTURAL z a PLANS ° ° ° ° ° I ° I I'AR SITE NOTES 1 . ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN 1 I w ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION 1 I w I -Story Church REQUIREMENTS. 8' 1 o - _ 0 1 24"NA Lap & Stone Siding T 10„As w C�1 w I I BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT j F - 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND VA ~ I I MATCH EXISTING I 0° LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 9_5M I PAVEMENT SECTION �\ I — N I 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. i 1 I CONCRETE STOOP i I I I 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. COORDINATE W/ 11 ARCHITECTURAL & 1- I I STRUCTURAL PLANS `< ADA PARKING SIGN '4 5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9'X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. TYP -SEE DETAIL INSTALL SIGN 2' FROM EDGE OF PAVEMENT 6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8 P1 I I c . BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO ' J I � _ _ _ _ PROPOSED 7 _ � EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 1 BUILDING Sz 1 ADDITION 1 FFE=916.17 • I I J2"SER. i cj w 1 0 1 "AS SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTES LLJ 1 I.-: ! 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SIGNAGE AND STRIPING AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN. �► 33 5 J t` a a m I . CONCRETE STOOP 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ALL ACCESSIBLE STALLS, LOGOS AND CROSSHATCH LOADING AISLES WITH 1 26"AS 32"AS , �� COORDINATE W/ WHITE PAVEMENT MARKING PAINT, 4" IN WIDTH. g I /-BRICK FIR�pI.F ARCHITECTURAL & CONCRETE STOOP STRUCTURAL PLANS 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS, AS SHOWN, IN WHITE PAINT. B12 ° 1 COORDINATE W/ 0.0*1 ARCHITECTURAL & ` / 4. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL INCLUDE POST, CONCRETE FOOTING AND STEEL CASING WHERE REQUIRED. ADD RIP -RAP OR _ I 1STRUCTURAL PLANS BIT. EDGE � � I CONCRETE SIDEWALK Ole APPROVED EQUAL 12"SP ° 5. ALL SIGNAGE NOT PROTECTED BY CURB, LOCATED IN PARKING LOT OR OTHER PAVED AREAS TO BE PLACED g , ON TYP-SEE DETAIL // TO END OF SWALE a IN STEEL CASING, FILLED WITH CONCRETE AND PAINTED YELLOW. REFER TO DETAIL. AVA FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION e /L �� ON % TRASH ENCLOSURE 92o6M .00 I I 6. ANY/ALL STOP SIGNS TO INCLUDE A 24" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT PLACED AT THE STOP i off OH — OH — — — — --------- _ PLANTING BED ----------------------------------L _J 1 9\6o SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN i I *,- SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK IF APPLICABLE. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM O Fn d. Solid lP - i� \ 6 DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO CURB. I 9% ,"I -9\1b. 1 i 7. ALL SIGNS TO BE PLACED 18" BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. $ i 1211 DIP B T V 6o Co I 1 MIN0US p *926 q I Ty � " a a I I ° 0�0 0 0 0 0 � i ° o � ° 1 °moo ' ° —4 I ° � I \4 d\a i CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! 1 4&,, "Q ° Gopher State One Call �a F40. --_ TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 �N TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 \ 4� \a �� WARNING: \Q� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL J 1 \\ EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. 4\ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, 811CO CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE 4"Co DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED _ a 6"cod DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. Page 84 RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX k�)mAm McGOUGH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. 17001.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX O� FOiz G `0`1 5�W G011; HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. (ENGINEER: TREVOR GRUYS, PE DATE: 01/30/17 (REG. NO.: 53706 PRO] #: DATE: (DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER C2-1 B12 L E X 33 - 50 O LU A d A N STMH dot 7 U - RIM=908.24 INV=897.50-N,E 9 a 9 91 90� 0 90� A INV=900.7�p§ 90�p w 901 2 / x` 9\0\0 9 24, CO x 0 t1 \ ~` 1 ° -912 24 CO 04 ` - G T I N H L A N D ELI Lot 9 4 1310 xC X 0 90 9 9 9\°O � \ x9� 99 CB VV x909• X9/0- \0'b __X90 RIM=911.88 x 9 16CO INV 898.92-E.1t�- - - - - - - Fn d. So l d IP - \° _ INV=905.33-S \\ x y / I 8 C0\ 2 \ . - - * -8"CO - - - - - - � T 0I 90 a x9 I I�i"C0� 9' ` __91j___ICgL073 12 P, -9/2- 8"SP 10 °90 / x ° x x 15� RCP .6 C0< < « « ��� - - -5 «� « TZ9 _ « 90 ° CO 2 8"P "PI 8"P1 3"PI "/I 6"p 8"P �.y' / < \ $ i v S < 6"P < .e 6 ,EL 2 811Pl 6"P 4"PI "EL 4"EL 0 12"SP _ \ 1 / =J07.94 901 I 9� Oa9 I \\\ \0 L -9// 6 EL PIRI9- I 9\ �_ < \� INV=892.'89-N�- 9\ \�. SMH Cg B 12" I 4"EL 44 9 �j );t- 91 0 INV=893.61-E v� 06 ��_ • 9\ ' I 9 RIM=912.36 9\ \ _ 90a/ �/ 9 I Cap, 9235 (b\\ L i INV=898.67 - INV=908�5f- JV=908.3 - - n B DGE ��'- - - -3 9\ V=9C i Oa p W a \ RIM 912.0E IN V=9( I T E 'Po - - - - - - - o 1B I T U M I N 0 U S N \ I 2"FR e / I� < rn i rn 1 rn \ � I 9 � I 6"CA 33 50 I ►I ,°'� I 1 \ 9 I CO a / \ -9 _ 9`a \ ^` 0 00 / \ ------ c� - - / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /-1- - - 9` ,9� x9` INLET PROTECT a x 90 a x9` 6/ X \-5eg13-' ,9\n� i-9\ \�5 / o \�� C`\ TYP-SEE DETAIL x9\� \ \ / x I \ L / 9 x 9 X b�1f 2 9\y 9\y L 9 k 9\� \ 18"MA \49 - 915-r- ,j I / \ - 0 \4X9\yx9 6 l \4 � \y9 a\ CO. %9q\ \ \yy 90 / A o I I I i / 9 b b 9 I l y Z\ / x 9 0: 9 y 1, \4 20"AS \S6 1 c, I / �� / 14.0 RQ x y 9 / 12"A9 / I � 0)I I I 9 /1 c0 I I a I ryy I\4 x� / y \ x n ~ 4 a 1 xIJ90� I I x °j` �/ / /Rssa x \yry \ - I I Cl)9°9\9 9\ I / �\ \ \ 0 _914 J 46 9 4 m I I / / \ S RD\ y \ \ \4 \ �` I x °j` 9\1 / I / / / 9\6_ RD ,�°. oo \ 9- / 9\4• \ \ 9 x S0.1 x 9\4y I x 1 x a = 16 11 I -Story Vaulted Church \ \ \ I 1 l r - \ * 10"ASBrick Siding �� w - 47.1+/- - I I R \ya D m x I / S� 9 RD 16.0± EX tion \y° 14.91± EX 14.80± EX / I �9\ \ I x9\y I x9\5 x9`4 6 ] �� / /L-1 4.88 P` I \\ 9\04 < OB 9 JI I °'\� 9 \ 6 9\4 -15,08 / 14.88± EX /915 g_ Z II J 9ti I I I 15.01 g\4' 9`y" y 9 / RD 9 //'' /R9 \9\a\ • 10"AS 1 5.00± EX 6"SP / I / I D I I I / \y 15.13 / I w I PROPOSED �`� ' o 2"AR 9 9\y4 / 15.12± EX / I x I / SMH-2' BUILDING / RIM=911.26 m I I - INV=895.46 B ADDITION `�_____�/ IM=911. r�a \ RD a e e cn 9\y� 15.29± EX 9\� x I NV=9§� . N /x9\y' FFE=91 6.1 / N� e e d 0 / \6y 9` \66 \6' / NV=90-5 / 9`y \ 9 'L `�0� I Z e 1 5. E y ,6916- J 9\by a 9d e 9 NV=900.14-W x x 00 (\ x e I 0 e Q < Hp o � �a 15.30 aEX 15.36± Ex `y' g 9\6$ a Q 9 CO / p p I / 9 ° x9`60Xg O �a Z 4 e 9\6• - 11-6 -- \ \ w I N I a 16.1' a\6' \6' 9\y' - 9 / ` » II SLOPE CONCRETE 3 9 1 0 9\60 17.9 / 8'9 'AR � 9 � BIO ROLL STOOP AT 2.0 /o MAX. \ TYP-SEE DETAIL /x9\9� / �Xg\�� 9 W y6/ 1, J II I I ^, I -Story Church ti U L�.I 9\y x 41- N 04 x 9\4 b x 9\y &4 MA x 9\ 9\ \ M Lap & Stone Siding M 9\y6 9\yy 1 °„As N I / I I I / 0\0 (;\4P'I 9\6• x 9\6y X9\1 \ x 9\� y Fn- / m I I I RDI l0 / / 15.8± EX 52.5 / 9 1 / \ 4"CIP I N� \ ? `6 -916 12M 1 Ib / / 1'l 1 - INV=03.32 / R15.75I 9\a I ? ` s s PER (PLAN \6 - sa9615.7 _ / ,9\8/ 16.07 91 94b \i5 \4y x9\6 �A� / 7. 1- \� \\,�yx9�\�'x' 16.17 15.87 / / I 2 x9 x9 4.3 x9 15.8 9\y F I x 9\y" 16.00 9\5., L / T \ I 8"PI RD ^ -7 16.17 15.87 15.8 , ,10"AS � /\ �M RD 16.07 \ A I I a 9'ROPOSED 15.8 \60 I \ 0 \ I I �� / 24.1 9\y� BUILDING 15.80 1 15.79 _ 9 9`9� \ V) I `° M / ,ADDITION � x9\�� �p I I - \�=916- - - x9\6AFE=916.17 1 GRASS SWALE l / -9\9 I ao \y p \y A- I 9� SO / • WAS I / 9x9 x x 1 0 9e 94 1 0 9\ / / / / x \0SER. n 9 9y� $ x9\4 g\y� 9 24.5 959 NEENAH R -4995-A1 1 W W W g\6� 15.9± TRENCH DRAIN 9\y 9\4" RD �(b EX 15.84 1 0 9\ a I AS F 1 Si 16.1 7 16.17 1 15.49 I / / \ GAS I GAS 1 GAs�X '_�1 11 16.05± EX X9 15.6 6,0� a 16.07, ;..;16.06 16.16± EX I � 1 � 12"9P 'FTS' 9 \4 \ Sr n `° 4 26"AS N 32"As 15.44 9` /J RIM=915. 6 - (\ 1 .0% / 9\9 \ 9\9 \ y64 g irNiv=so7.8 N <2 .� �`t _ =SMR �IREPIT � 920 INV=909.29 S w I 1 I 4g �t / / N V=9 I. I - EE 9\ ~ 9\6 x 1 x 9` i \y' G" / \ .15.0± 9\y .\9 a�6 � I v v e ml BEE OW Y + / �b BIT. EDGE c 6• gt� II RIM -91 . 15.0_ G ASS WALE >> 9 \ I INV 908.17-5 1 i 12"SP \a� \94 y0� y INV=911.17-SE -b i e 9 9\9• °� 0 09 i1 ON �p >> �/ -JS 14.8± X 15.0 3S �� 9\ -TRASH ENCLOSURE / / / 9�°6M �20�6 9`9 T�CLGSUR 1 e 9 `4 x9`4 OH -S- / / / / / I I � �'l03/3- • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J� � � SILT FENCE / / 1 �- 1 � _ -� L_6T_IRIRO C T I CI f�I \y / / \ / I J � O 9\6' BEL ti1_1\6 I I \ "As 2 - \a T / 9 EC / / 9\a0 x x 9$13. / /S% - -916- - - � _ I � - 4 I �P ~ 9\6. Co 9\6 TEC ( x / / \ I 8 c! TUM N -°' � x \6` � so"co \ � �x9ti°ry / � x9� A 9\6 ] 9 1 O V S �TFz - - \6 ] 0 02 9\6• p / * / 19,L`L0 9�,`L0 9ry'L6\ tib TEC 'l�� 9 4 I a d e a 9I O LU RIM=916.29 �� 9 / 7' x 9\ \ I x 9` / / �2� 26.3 - r -C INV=911.75-NW \� y I / _ INV=912.70-S g \ 0'b I D D ��0 9\�' TF< I x92 • �� l x 1 a RIM=917.98 n O-4 eo INV=898.98 x _Q ` \ 6 I J / \ ~ \d\ 9\a \aS I x9�\ *9ryti " a e n/-`2S`lvp bo O 4 /2i� 9 x9 I e 9L �\ IA a 4- y0h x9�\2 I e` I Q \ 9\9 9/ 9 \ x 9 I . d - V) \Q� 9 TFC I X9 x (-X, co l A - V n 92 \ \ 9ry\ \ cc rF� , \ x 92� (� y , q�V 6"MA \ d / 9`L\�\ x 9`L" 8 CO cc \ /�GQ �/ \ 921.7 ° - \ \ \ \6"�04� v' 7+/ Page 85 GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 6. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 7. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 IN TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX k�)mAm McGOUGH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. 17001.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX O� FOG `0\4 � GOA HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. (ENGINEER: TREVOR GRUYS, PE DATE: 01/30/17 (REG. NO.: 53706 PRO] #: DATE: (DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER C3-1 0 20 40 N-%7=mm SCALE IN FEET EXISTING CIVIL LEGEND PROPOSED U SANITARY MANHOLE 0 STORM MANHOLE O ®� CATCH BASIN 00 D CULVERT HYDRANT f X GATEVALVE N @Ply POST INDICATOR VALVE OP1V LIGHT POLE 0 POWER POLE 0 _7T_ SIGN v _01. #3 BENCHMARK - SOIL BORINGS- \W WATER MANHOLE \T TELEPHONE MANHOLE \U UTILITY MANHOLE (E ELECTRIC MANHOLE -W� WATER SERVICE -pS- SANITARY SERVICE 1l HANDICAP PARKING 1.0% DIRECTION OF FLOW - me 924.6 X SPOT ELEVATION --924- CONTOURS > - SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN I FIM- FORCEMAIN FM » DRAINTILE » DT - SILT FENCE CURB & GUTTER RETAINING WALL TREELINE EASEMENT LINE - - - - - SETBACK LINE - - - - X X FENCE LINE -X-X- ----TEL TEL UNDERGROUND TELE AS UNDERGROUND GAS OH OVERHEAD UTILITY FO UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SLE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CTV UNDERGROUND CABLE TV PROPERTY LINE CONIFEROUS TREE CDECIDUOUS TREE PARKING COUNTS Q GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT WALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 6. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 7. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 IN TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX k�)mAm McGOUGH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. 17001.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX O� FOG `0\4 � GOA HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. (ENGINEER: TREVOR GRUYS, PE DATE: 01/30/17 (REG. NO.: 53706 PRO] #: DATE: (DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEET NUMBER C3-1 IJ TRENCH CASTINGS: TRENCH WITH PAN Neenah Foundry offers a variety of cast iron trench and pan castings. Select from the list below to find the trench and pan castings that fit your needs. R-4995 & R-4996 Type M Trench Frame with Solid or Grated Cover - R-4995 & R-4996 Type M Trench Frame with Solid or Grated Corer Cast Iron trench assemblies—light or heavy duty—for use In sidewalks, driveways, garages, loading darks, etc. Read Carefully Before Ordering Specify: • Complete catalog number. • Light or heavy duty. • Overall length of cover required. • Lid solid, flat grated, or diagonally barred convex grate. • Location of outlet, side, bottom or end (give dimensional location and pipe size). • Whether one end or both ends are able to be open or closed. � gait a eearaa Trench mvetx are used over areas raga{ring Inng a7 sixes and lengths m meet ap niil needs For illummting Type M hams with grated corer. Standard wrth 4 -Inch ttenchaa of irregular pelt.., arra nga me Ma can be outride caulk outlet. Can be equipped for inside -11, if specified. made to furnish cover. Rt. IIL: .. Sactlo-7 Thrid Dreim. TypeM - �o --- mnr...r 1. PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH Standard 4 -Inch outlet at and SECTIONS TNRU DRAINS - v of drain. Special aim outlols ire en apeaal ord,, Side and bonom outlets opsional and lurrvshed only m "' when sp«ified. '—"T- tit — "—as - Catalog at 6 FT MAX. SPACING. Number Description A B C D Length • 2 IN X 21N HARDWOOD, OR STANDARD STEEL T -TYPE Standard Sizes—Light Duty 11 -4995 -At •* with grated cover 11-112 314 10 6-314 as ordered R -4995-A2 * with grated cover 7 314 5 4-314 as ordered Above standard frames made in 4ft. sections, covers in 2fte lengths. * Available with type B grate only. ** Also available with type P grate. 18'-0" SEE PLAN 1'-0" 0 o rn OD o 0, wP. V D A O Z a(�n 0NOD V � � ooD0Ln z�c� 0 r Z D E: Z�� m Zv /n m = Ln Ln w 0" m D w M 0 D �n 0 m m m n m D a 0`_n n -� � t) m P rZ�()� ADO_ - Z -::! Z-::! C) 4-o _ G)m Z 041 L Z �/n� �Z mA 2ZDDm Do11m A m n 77m n p m 0 0 N LOUCKS PLATE NO. i■ LOUCKS 3 TYPICAL ADA PARKING 2037 DRAWN 2/2016 DEFLECTOR PLATE OVERFLOW 1 -CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY OVERFLOW TOP F CURB BOX CURB ROAD DRAIN HIGH-FL.OW INLET PROTECTION CURB AND GUTTER MODEL HIGH-FL.OW FABRIC 2'X3' SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER POLYESTER FILTER SLEEVE ASSEMBLY , 27" MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY e t 27" SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER WIMCO ROAD DRAIN, OR APPROVED EQUAL LOUCKS PLATE NO. i■ LOUCKS 6INLET PROTECTION - 3011 EXISTING STORM STRUCTURES DRAWN 2/2016 Page 86 ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH APPROPRIATE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS, WASHERS & NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP & BOTTOM OF SIGN) "HANDICAP DROP-OFF ZONE NO PARKING" o c GRADE NOTES: 1. PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER ACCESS AISLE IL 2. SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL STANDARDS IL HANDICAP ACCESS ISLE NQ PARKING SIGN NOT TO SCALE 5- ATTACH SIGN TO POST WITH APPROPRIATE STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS, WASHERS & NUTS. (TYP. AT TOP & BOTTOM OF SIGN) "PARKING BY DISABLED PERMIT ONLY" "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN GRADE )TES: I. PROVIDE (1) SIGN PER ST, 2. SIGN MUST MEET LOCAL STANDARDS HANDICAP PARKING SIGN NOT TO SCALE 10" DIAMETER ALL LINES 5" WIDE PROVIDE PAINTED WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL AT EACH DESIGNATED HANDICAP PARKING STALL. CENTER SYMBOL IN STALL. WHEELCHAIR SYMBOL NOT TO SCALE LOUCKS PLATE No. i■TYPICAL ADA WHEELCHAIR 2038 DUCKS 2 SYMBOL & PARKING SIGN DRAWN 2/2016 i■ DUCKS FINISHED GRADE 4" 4,000 PSI TYPE I CONCRETE (REINFORCE W/FIBER MESH) 4" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE (100% CRUSHED OR RECYCLE, MN DOT 2211) PREPARED SUBGRADE 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2035 DRAWN 2/2016 NOTES: �o 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET 1. PLACE BOTTOM EDGE OF FENCE INTO 6 IN DEEP TRENCH POINT ''A'' AND BACKFILL IMMEDIATELY. POINT "B" STRAW OR WOOD FIBER 0" 2. POSTS SHALL BE: OR 12'' DIA. SEDIMENT 2737 Fairview Ave N at 6 FT MAX. SPACING. (651) 633-5050 POLYPROPYLENE NETTING • 2 IN X 21N HARDWOOD, OR STANDARD STEEL T -TYPE 2'' X 2'' X 18" LONG WOODEN FENCE POSTS. STAKES AT 2'-0" SPACING. DRIVE (763) 843-0420 • 5' MIN. LENGTH POSTS, DRIVEN 2 FT INTO THE CIVIL ENGINEER PENETRATING FIBER LOG. GROUND. Flow (651) 221-0401 3. ATTACH FABRIC TO WOOD POST WITH A MIN. OF 5,1 17001.00 NOTE: INCH LONG STAPLES. POINT 'A" (BOTTOM OF BIOROLL AT END) MUST BE HIGHER Saint Paul, MN 55101 4. ATTACH FABRIC TO STEEL POST WITH A MIN. OF 3 ZIP WATER FLOWS OVER THE DIKE AND NOT AROUND THE ENDS. LGOO� ,\I- TIES IN TOP 8 INCHES OF FABRIC. CIO LOUCKS PLATE NO. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC q- BIOROLL DITCH CHECK 3007 PER MNDOT 3886 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. �\0� G EOTEXTI LE FABRIC PER PRO] #: DATE: (DRAWN BY: MNDOT 3886 REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE e 5 C8- 1 LOUCKS PLATE NO. i■ LOUCKS SILT FENCE 3000 PRE -ASSEMBLED OR MACHINE SLICED DRAWN 2/2016 i■ DUCKS FINISHED GRADE 4" 4,000 PSI TYPE I CONCRETE (REINFORCE W/FIBER MESH) 4" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE (100% CRUSHED OR RECYCLE, MN DOT 2211) PREPARED SUBGRADE 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2035 DRAWN 2/2016 RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE �o 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 POINT ''A'' (651) 228-0624 FAX POINT "B" STRAW OR WOOD FIBER 0" DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR OR 12'' DIA. SEDIMENT 2737 Fairview Ave N LOG ROLL ENCLOSED IN (651) 633-5050 POLYPROPYLENE NETTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 2'' X 2'' X 18" LONG WOODEN 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. STAKES AT 2'-0" SPACING. DRIVE (763) 843-0420 THROUGH NETTING, NOT CIVIL ENGINEER PENETRATING FIBER LOG. 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Flow (651) 221-0401 TRENCH IF LOOSE SOILS 17001.00 NOTE: LOUCKS ASSOCIATES POINT 'A" (BOTTOM OF BIOROLL AT END) MUST BE HIGHER Saint Paul, MN 55101 THAN POINT "B" (TOP OF BIOROLL IN MIDDLE) TO ENSURE THAT WATER FLOWS OVER THE DIKE AND NOT AROUND THE ENDS. LGOO� ,\I- CIO LOUCKS PLATE NO. i■ LOUCKS q- BIOROLL DITCH CHECK 3007 DRAWN 2/2016 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX MAN tIV McGO GH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. 17001.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX LGOO� ,\I- CIO HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ENGINEER: TREVOR GRUYS, PE DATE: 01/30/17 REG. NO.: 153706 PRO] #: DATE: (DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE CIVIL DETAILS SHEET NUMBER C8- 1 12''[)Ip I RIM=917.98 INV=898.98 LANDSCAPE PLAN - RIM=911.88 _ ISN Vea 05.323 SS RIM=912.06 \ INV=908.56 \ — / I TRASH ENCLOSURE ------- °H —off — — — — — — — — °H - - ----- --- T TEL TEL �� s— — — — --- TEL —I BI TUMINOUS so co \ q / RIM=916.29---------- -- ---- --- - - ..,.�\ INV =911.75—NW _ _ INV —912.70—S � I l 4 / LEGEND: TURF SEED MIX - MNDOT 25-131 ►wi�i!Iwi�i!I�ffio WE 0 20 40 N SCALE IN FEET Page 87 PLANTING NOTES: 1. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOT COVERED BY BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, OR PLANTING BEDS. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING ACTIVITIES WITH GENERAL SITE CONTRACTOR. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY SOIL OR WATER CONCERNS WHICH BECOME APPARENT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION FOR PLANTINGS. HAND DIGGING MAY BE NECESSARY. 5. MULCH FOR SEEDED AREAS WITH SLOPES LESS THAN 15% SHALL BE TYPE 5 WOOD FIBER HYDROMULCH CONFORMING TO MnDOT 3884 PLACED AT 2000LBS. PER ACRE. MULCH FOR SEEDED AREAS GREATER THAN 15% SHALL BE MnDOT CATEGORY 1 STRAW RD 1 S BLANKET CONFORMING TO mNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3885. 6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF ROUGH GRADING, WITH REVEGETATION TO OCCUR WITHIN 48 HOURS. REFER TO SHEETS C3-2, C3-2 AND C34 FOR INFORMATION ON SITE STABILIZATION PRODEDURES. 7. ALL AREAS SEEDED WITH TURF SEED MIX SHALL RECEIVE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER @ 200LBS. PER ACRE. 8. ALL AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 9. SCARIFY ALL LAWN AREAS TO A DEATH OF 6" PRIOR TO INSTALLING TURF SEED MIX. NATIVE PLUG LIST QTY COMMON NAME COMMENTS 5 NODDING WILD RYE PLANT 2" PLUGS AT 24" O.C. USING AN EQUAL NUMBER OF THE SPECIFIED SPECIES PLACED RANDOMLY. 5 . 5 FOWL BLUEGRASS 5 AMERICAN SLOUGH GRASS 5 FRINGED BROME IJ B I l I I T U M I N 0 U S - RIM=911.88 _ ISN Vea 05.323 SS RIM=912.06 \ INV=908.56 \ — / I TRASH ENCLOSURE ------- °H —off — — — — — — — — °H - - ----- --- T TEL TEL �� s— — — — --- TEL —I BI TUMINOUS so co \ q / RIM=916.29---------- -- ---- --- - - ..,.�\ INV =911.75—NW _ _ INV —912.70—S � I l 4 / LEGEND: TURF SEED MIX - MNDOT 25-131 ►wi�i!Iwi�i!I�ffio WE 0 20 40 N SCALE IN FEET Page 87 PLANTING NOTES: 1. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOT COVERED BY BUILDINGS, PAVEMENT, OR PLANTING BEDS. 2. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING ACTIVITIES WITH GENERAL SITE CONTRACTOR. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY SOIL OR WATER CONCERNS WHICH BECOME APPARENT. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION FOR PLANTINGS. HAND DIGGING MAY BE NECESSARY. 5. MULCH FOR SEEDED AREAS WITH SLOPES LESS THAN 15% SHALL BE TYPE 5 WOOD FIBER HYDROMULCH CONFORMING TO MnDOT 3884 PLACED AT 2000LBS. PER ACRE. MULCH FOR SEEDED AREAS GREATER THAN 15% SHALL BE MnDOT CATEGORY 1 STRAW RD 1 S BLANKET CONFORMING TO mNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3885. 6. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SEEDED WITHIN 48 HOURS OF ROUGH GRADING, WITH REVEGETATION TO OCCUR WITHIN 48 HOURS. REFER TO SHEETS C3-2, C3-2 AND C34 FOR INFORMATION ON SITE STABILIZATION PRODEDURES. 7. ALL AREAS SEEDED WITH TURF SEED MIX SHALL RECEIVE 10-10-10 FERTILIZER @ 200LBS. PER ACRE. 8. ALL AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 9. SCARIFY ALL LAWN AREAS TO A DEATH OF 6" PRIOR TO INSTALLING TURF SEED MIX. NATIVE PLUG LIST QTY COMMON NAME COMMENTS 5 NODDING WILD RYE PLANT 2" PLUGS AT 24" O.C. USING AN EQUAL NUMBER OF THE SPECIFIED SPECIES PLACED RANDOMLY. 5 VIRGINIA WILD RYE 5 FOWL BLUEGRASS 5 AMERICAN SLOUGH GRASS 5 FRINGED BROME 5 INDIAN GRASS 5 SWITCHGRASS 5 BLUE VERVAIN 5 PURPLE PRAIRIE CLOVER 5 CANADA TICK TREFOIL 5 EARLY SUNFLOWER 5 BLACK-EYED SUSAN 5 MARSH MILKWEED u %A/AnkilLilel_ CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/ OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX mAn GH k�) MV ==ii DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX PROJECT NO. 17001.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX O� HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Larry Wacker - LA 12579 License No. Date PRO] #: I DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/17 TITLE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHEET NUMBER L1-1 A102 3 A102 4 F 1.'1W:iY NWA 53 SF NOTE: 0 GRAY TONE ON PLANS AND ELEVATIONS DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING GRAY HATCH ON PLANS DENOTES RENOVATION TO EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING: 8,900 GSF RENOVATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING: 580 GSF NEW CONSTRUCTION: 3,750 GSF TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 12,650 GSF FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 58'-6" 119'-6" N Page 88 24G RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX 40* -4101 kVmAn McGOUGH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX O� FOG `011� 1J O5��� GA HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly registered architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ARCHITECT: Craig E. Rafferty DATE: REG. NO.: 13037 PROI #: 1603.01 DATE: 02/08/2017 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/2017 TITLE FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER A101 EXISTING WOOD SIDING EXISTING ASPHALT SHIN EXISTING PAINTED, SCO EAST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" NOTE: GRAY TONE ON PLANS AND ELEVATIONS DENOTES EXISTING BUILDING FXISTING Rlm DING EXISTING BUILDING NORTH ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" SVL/ I fl CLC V/AI IVIV IVI"I — —I ­V11 —I" vv— II%11 vvr-uw 1/8" = 1'-0" FXISTINC, Rt m DING, OR LEVEL 01-011 E ROOF 10'-0" Z LEVEL 0'-0" WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0" Page 89 RAFFERTY RAFFERTY TOLLEFSON LINDEKE ARCHITECTS, INC. 278 EAST SEVENTH STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 55101 (651) 224-4831 (651) 228-0624 FAX 40* -4101 kVmAn McGOUGH DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION 2737 Fairview Ave N Saint Paul, MN 55113 (651) 633-5050 (651) 633-5673 FAX STRUCTURAL ENGINEER BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55429 (763) 843-0420 (763) 843-0421 FAX CIVIL ENGINEER LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT LOUCKS ASSOCIATES 365 East Kellogg Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 221-0401 (651) 297-6817 FAX c�0� �0' �0 G HOLY FAMILY MARONITE CHURCH 1960 Lexington Ave South Mendota Heights, MN 55118 1 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am duly registered architect under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ARCHITECT: Craig E. Rafferty DATE: REG. NO.: 13037 PROI #: 1603.01 DATE: 02/08/2017 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: REVISIONS ISSUE DATE CUP APPLICATION 02/08/2017 TITLE ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A402