2012-10-16 Council PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
October 16, 2012 — 7:00 p.m.
Mendota Heights City Hall
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Adopt Agenda
5. Consent Agenda
a. Acknowledgement of October 2, 2012 City Council Minutes
b. Acknowledgement of October 9, 2012 Parks and Recreation Commission
Minutes
c. Approval of Resolution Supporting 2013 -17 Dakota County Capital
Improvements Plan
d. Approval of 2013 LMCIT Insurance Renewal
e. Receipt of September Fire Synopsis Report
f. Receipt of September Par 3 Report
g. Approval of Change Order #1 for Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Street
Improvement Project
h. Approval of Final Payment for Public Works Garage Roof Repair
i. Approval of Contractors List
j. Approval of Claims List
6. Public Comments
7. Public Hearings
a. Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Street Improveemnt Project Assessment
Hearing
8. Unfinished and New Business
a. Hunter /Orchard Neighborhood Street Improvement Project
9. Council Comments
10. Adjourn
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Minutes of the Regular Meeting
Held Tuesday, October 2, 2012
page 2
5a.
Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights,
Minnesota.
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Krebsbach called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present:
Councilmembers Duggan, Povolny, Petschel, and Vitelli.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADOPTION
Mayor Krebsbach presented the agenda for adoption. Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of the
agenda.
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT CALENDAR
Mayor Krebsbach presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and
approval. Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the consent calendar as presented and
authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein; pulling items C) Approval of
MSP Airport 2020 Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Comment Letter.
a. Acknowledgement of September 18, 2012 City Council Minutes
• Corrections to the minutes were noted
• Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the corrected minutes. Councilmember Vitelli
seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
b. Acknowledgement of September 24, 2012 Planning Commission Minutes
c. Approval of MSP Airport 2020 Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Comment Letter
d. Approval of Planning Case 2012 -27, Wetlands Permit and Variance, Mendakota Country Club
e. Receipt of September 2012 Building Activity Report
f Approval of Massage Therapist License, Laura Duncan
page 3
g. Receipt of August 2012 Treasurer's Report
h. Approval of Contractors List
i. Approval of Claims List
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
CONSENT AGENDA TOPIC
C) APPROVAL OF MSP AIRPORT 2020 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
WORKSHEET COMMENT LETTER
Councilmember Petschel stated that the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) has come up with a
2020 Long Term Comprehensive Plan for the airport. They are at the point in the plan where they are
asking for comments for the environmental assessment/environmental assessment worksheet
(EA/EAW). Councilmember Petschel has worked with City Administrator Justin Miller on drafting the
city's response.
Councilmember Petschel clarified that when the plan was first presented, at the end of 2020 the MSP
Airport was supposed to be at 630,000 operations, which would have been at capacity. Since the plan
was drafted the Delta merger and a concept called `up- gauging' in terms of number of flights and type of
aircraft have occurred, which has resulted in a reduction in operations at the airport. Whether they do
any of the 2020 long term comprehensive plans, the FAA is estimating that airport operations at most
airports should increase about two percent per year. This plan is in line with the FAA.
Whenever there is a plan that is increasing operations, the desire is to make sure that MAC completes
every step they are legally required to do before it can begin looking at expansion of the runways.
Therefore, the Mendota Heights response asks that when MAC gets to seventy percent of capacity they
are required to show how they are going to increase capacity.
They are also required to work with the Noise Oversight Committee in terms of continuing to attenuate
homes that might move into a louder noise contour, which they have agreed to do along with Delta.
At the October 30th City Council meeting, the concept of precision -based navigation will be presented.
This means that the airplanes will not be flown by the pilots but by a computer. They will be flying
from point -to -point in straight lines. It is a cleaner operation but it definitely has an effect on the noise
contour. It is being requested that MAC thoroughly examine the effect of precision -based navigation on
the noise contour in light of the new plan.
Councilmember Petschel listed some of the plans at MSP:
• Gate areas to be enlarged with more seats and bathrooms
• Gut and redo the baggage area
• Gut and redo the international arrival from a terrorist standpoint — self - contained and easier for
homeland security to control
• At some point they are going to decide if the Sky Team members are going to be limited to the main
terminal and everybody else will be put over at Terminal 2
page 4
All of the changes are going to be need - based. Councilmember Petschel stated that the changes are
more amenity- based, as opposed to adding more runways. She believes that the city's response
addresses that and she endorsed the letter dated October 3, 2012.
Councilmember Petschel moved Acceptance of MSP Airport 2020 Draft Environmental Assessment
Worksheet Comment Letter
Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A) MENDOTA HEIGHTS BP —
CONSIDERATION FOR HAVING CURRENT PRICING SIGN UPDATED
Mr. Sean Hoffman, Mendota Heights BP, commented that they are looking at replacing their existing
price sign with an updated sign. They currently have a forty-five foot tall sign at a bad angle. They
would like to replace the sign with a fourteen foot tall, LED sign. This sign would not flash, could be
turned off at night, would not rotate, and would be environmentally friendly as it would not take as
much energy to operate and could be changed without the need to climb a ladder.
Mayor Krebsbach informed Mr. Hoffman that the Council would need a formal application for the
proposed sign and the Council would want to give an informal review because of the City's ordinance
against digital signage.
In response to inquiry by Mayor Krebsbach, City Attorney Tami Diehm commented that current
ordinance prohibits all types of digital signage and this topic has been before the Council in the past. If
the Council is interested in amending the code to allow limited signs of this type they could direct staff
to bring forward a proposal or could invite the business manager to submit an application.
Mayor Krebsbach requested that an application be submitted.
Councilmember Duggan expressed his support for this type of digital sign.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A) MARIE AVENUE STREET PROJECT ASSESSMENT
Assistant City Engineer Ryan Ruzek explained the Marie Avenue project consisted of rehabilitating
Marie Avenue between Delaware Avenue and Dodd Road. The project is substantially complete and is
within budget; however, the schedule was slightly delayed due to watermain issues and the storm
damage in June. Staff is confident that the assessment amounts are adequate for the project and
requested that Council approve the assessment roll as proposed. Staff has not received any objections or
requests for deferral to the assessments. Should the Council approve the assessment roll, any residents
that are on the roll could pay their entire assessment at the City within thirty days or it would be placed
onto their property taxes and payable over a ten -year period at a six percent annual interest rate.
page 5
Councilmember Duggan commented that when this project was brought before the Council there were
concerns expressed in regards to the placement of mailboxes. Assistant Engineer Ruzek replied that
they were not able to get the mailboxes relocated out of the trail. However, they were able to make the
trail a little wider so the trail can be plowed with the City's small equipment.
Councilmember Petschel commented that residents also requested narrower striping to slow traffic and
asked if this has been completed. Assistant Engineer Ruzek answered that the streets were striped a few
days ago at the eleven foot street width.
Mayor Krebsbach asked if the street was finished. Assistant Engineer Ruzek replied that there are still a
few minor punch -list items, a fence that needs to be constructed, grading around the pond, some minor
restorations, and the addition of a baffle to one of the storm manholes to assist with sediment removal.
Mayor Krebsbach requested a brief clarification on the public hearing process. Staff would like for each
resident who wishes to speak to come forward and state their name and property address for the record.
Council and staff would hear their comments and respond as Council directs.
Mayor Krebsbach asked if once the public hearing is closed, can a resident come back to the podium to
speak. Attorney Diehm replied that if Council would like to retain the ability to take additional public
comments, then she recommended that the public hearing remain open.
Councilmembers expressed their desire to open the public hearing, hear comments from the residents,
and have the comment and discussion period among Council and staff before closing the public hearing.
Administrator Miller clarified that anyone wishing to either ask for a deferral under city policy or
formally contest the assessment, the city must receive the request in writing before the public hearing is
closed. If either is received, staff recommended that the Council adopt the assessment roll complete,
without those assessments, and they would vote on each of those afterwards. If anyone would wish to
further contest their assessment, then they would have ten days to file in the District Court. By putting it
in writing, they preserve their right to further contest the assessment.
Councilmember Duggan asked if the residents were made aware of their rights and these requirements to
contest their assessment. Mr. Ruzek replied that each resident received a letter that stated the amount to
be assessed to the specific parcel identification number and the process for contesting the assessment in
writing before the close of the public hearing.
Mayor Krebsbach opened the public hearing for the Marie Avenue Street Project Assessment.
Mr. Mick Rosenberg, 602 Marie Avenue, asked when he should expect to see the bill for the assessment.
Mr. Ruzek replied that once the assessment roll is adopted, it basically starts the process where any
resident to be assessed can pay the assessment at City Hall within the next thirty days without any
interest. The assessment can be paid after November 2, 2012 and before the end of the year but interest
would accrue beginning with the closing of this hearing. After December 31, 2012 the assessment
would be paid at Dakota County.
Councilmember Vitelli moved to close the public hearing.
Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion.
page 6
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE MARIE AVENUE REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201107).
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Councilmember Duggan made a point of clarification that there were no additional costs to anyone even
though the project took longer than expected.
Councilmember Petschel asked for confirmation that once the road barricades are removed, the speed
cart will be set up in the area to collect data on traffic speeds, as requested by the residents. Public
Works Director John Mazzitello stated that pre - construction speed data was gathered and staff will take
some post - construction data and measure how well the narrow lanes are working for controlling the
speed.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
B) MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD / DIANE ROAD
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET PROJECT ASSESSMENT
Assistant City Engineer Ryan Ruzek explained that this project entailed three separate neighborhoods
that were of similar treatment types so staff combined them together for economy of scale.
The first project was Mendota Heights Road which was rehabilitated from Dodd Road to Delaware
Avenue. The rehabilitation consisted of a complete two inch mill over the entire street and two inch
overlay on top of that. The existing pavement seams were taken all of the way down to the gravel base
and patched in. The new striping was installed on this street and staff has received a number of
compliments, especially as they were trying to make it safer for children crossing the road with the
crosswalks being more visible. A right turn lane was added at Dodd Road for traffic going north on
Dodd Road.
The rest of the project consisted of the Diane Road Neighborhood. The Diane north area consisted of a
complete pavement replacement. Staff did encounter some sub -grade correction in an area, which was
built into the project costs so the project did come in on budget. Another area consisted of a mill and
overlay; a six inch edge mill and paved one and one -half inch over the entire street, curb and gutter were
replaced in both of the neighborhoods.
Eagle Ridge Road had a large eight inch thick asphalt section that was reclaimed, mixed in with the
existing soils, the top layer was removed and a new four inch bituminous surface installed. Minor curb
and gutter were replaced
All of the streets did have existing storm sewer systems and the other utilities were in good condition.
Mendota Heights Road spans multiple zoning areas so staff used a front footage assessment for this
project. There was one residential property, the school district, and two city parks that were assessed. It
is a State aid street so the city used its MSA funds to pay for most of the project.
page 7
For the north section of Diane Road, this was a complete pavement replacement. This was a
rehabilitation project so residents have the choice to pay the assessment in full at the City within thirty
days (November 2, 2012), after which it would be certified to Dakota County and be put on the
residents' property taxes over a ten year period at six percent interest.
Councilmember Duggan asked why there are different dollar amounts in relation to the assessment on
Diane Road. Assistant Engineer Ruzek replied that there were different treatments. Diane Road was
actually constructed at different times. The north section, which has the higher assessment amount, was
constructed with only two inches of bituminous over six inches of aggregate base. The two inch section
was not adequate by the city standards and so the two inch bituminous and approximately one inch to
one and one -half inch of the gravel were removed and replaced with three and one -half inches of new
bituminous.
The south area was constructed at a later time and had a three inch bituminous cross - section and so staff
felt comfortable that a standard mill and overlay would rehab those streets.
Councilmember Petschel complimented the contractor who completed the project on Mendota Heights
Road. Assistant Engineer Ruzek stated that McNamara Contracting was a good contractor to work with.
Mayor Krebsbach opened the public hearing for the Mendota Heights Road / Diane Road Neighborhood
Street Project Assessment
Ms. Stephanie Greenstein, 923 Douglas Road, in regards to the South Diane Road project, asked if it
went down in price. Assistant Engineer Ruzek replied that the original assessments were $1,802.45;
however, the city received very good prices on the project and so the price did go down to $1,287.42.
Councilmember Duggan moved to close the public hearing.
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mayor Krebsbach asked why the price on the South Diane Road project went down. Assistant Engineer
Ruzek replied that the bid price for bituminous came in lower than expected. Mayor Krebsbach asked if
the city also received a better price because of the larger scale of the projects. Assistant Engineer Ruzek
replied in the affirmative. All three projects this year came in well under staffs estimates.
Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201110)
AND DIANE ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201106).
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
C) HUNTER AND ORCHARD NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
page 8
Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood improvements were identified as a 2013 reconstruction project and
includes Culligan Lane, Glenhill Road, Hunter Lane, Orchard Circle, Orchard Place, and Veronica Lane.
The feasibility report for the Hunter Orchard Improvements was accepted by Mendota Heights City
Council on August 21, 2012.
Assistant City Engineer Ryan Ruzek gave a presentation that was given at the neighborhood
informational meeting. City Engineer John Mazzitello addressed some of the issues that were brought
up at that informational meeting.
Issues that were identified for this project included excessive speed on Hunter Lane and Orchard Place;
parking issues around the synagogue and the top of the hill; general knowledge that the streets have
failing bituminous surface, are in relatively poor condition, and no longer meet the city's minimum
design criteria; and stormwater drainage issues.
The scope of the project includes street reconstruction on Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan
Lane (East), and storm sewer improvements. Staff is proposing a complete water main replacement and
is proposing to rehabilitate the lift station at Veronica Lane. The project would also include street
rehabilitation on Culligan Lane (West), Glenhill Road, Veronica Lane and Orchard Circle.
The total estimated project costs are $2,399,195.96
Pursuant to the city's Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy, benefiting property owners would
be assessed at fifty percent of the street reconstruction costs. City costs for the reconstruction would
include fifty percent of those costs plus one - hundred percent of the storm sewers, sanitary sewer, lift
station rehabilitation, water main replacement, and appurtenant work.
For the $2,399,195.96, staff is proposing that $537,225 would be collected through special assessments.
The city would bond for $883,842.83 and utility funds would cover the storm sewer, water main, and
sanitary sewer improvements of $978,128.13.
It is proposed that construction would begin in June of 2013 and be substantially completed by the fall
of 2013.
City Engineer John Mazzitello explained that the project is the result of taking responses from the area
residents. Staff has identified four major issues that the residents have with the project
1. Drainage issues on Hunter Lane and Orchard Place - construction would install curb and gutter and
storm sewer.
2. Speed - residents felt that speed through the Hunter / Orchard area was excessive
3. Road widths - proposed at thirty feet wide in the main line sections
4. Curb type - a number of residents prefer a surmountable curb.
The proposed project shows a twenty -seven foot wide section at Lexington and Orchard Place, widening
to a thirty foot section between Lexington and Orchard Circle, where it tapers to a twenty -five section
with curb bump outs. It widens back to thirty feet between Orchard Circle and the ninety - degree curve,
where it is twenty -seven feet wide. This section was not reduced to twenty -five feet because of the
page 9
angle of the curve. There is a thirty foot wide section from the curve down to Culligan Lane, where
again it turns into a twenty -five foot section with the curb bump outs for speed control; and on the very
southern end, staff is proposing a thirty-six foot wide section to be able to accommodate on- street
parking on both sides of Hunter Lane. Staff is proposing a barrier curb with a six inch vertical face that
is in accordance with the other streets that have been reconstructed within the city, and is in accordance
with the Street Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Policy that was originally adopted in 1992 and
reviewed by Council this past June in a workshop and not amended.
Councilmember Vitelli asked for clarification as to why the reductions at the ninety degree curve; why is
it not the thirty feet like the rest of the road. City Engineer Mazzitello replied that in order to prohibit
the on- street parking the street needed to be narrowed. Councilmember Povolny asked if twenty -seven
feet would be wide enough for a semi -truck to go around the curve. Assistant Engineer Ruzek replied
that staff has not done any turning movements for that. However, it would basically be like a right turn
since it is a ninety- degree angle. He is confident that a semi could make that turning move.
Councilmember Vitelli asked what the fire department has recommended for street width. Assistant
Engineer Ruzek answered that both the fire chief and the assistant fire chief replied that if the city is
allowing parking on both sides of the street, they would prefer the city standard of thirty -three feet. If
there is parking on one side of the street they would be okay with a thirty -foot wide street.
Mayor Krebsbach stated that Eden Prairie, Woodbury, and Eagan have surmountable curbs throughout.
She is unaware of any water problems or parking problems in those areas. Councilmember Vitelli
responded by stating that it is not a good thought process to look at what other cities are doing as
Mendota Heights has standards that Council and staff have been following.
Mayor Krebsbach commented that she is open to what the residents want. City Engineer Mazzitello
replied that Eden Prairie, Woodbury, and Eagan were developed largely in mass; meaning entire
subdivisions were put in at once. The reason the surmountable curb was invented was so that streets
could go in without any development on them. The driveways could be placed wherever the developer
felt. In the case of Hunter and Orchard, the driveways are already there and city policy stipulates that
barrier curb is to be installed.
Mayor Krebsbach stated that exceptions have been made to city policy in the past. The Council would
not be abandoning policy; it would be a modification of the policy.
Councilmember Duggan asked what the current width is where Orchard and Hunter meet. Assistant
Engineer Ruzek replied it is twenty -two to twenty -four feet wide. Councilmember Duggan asked if staff
would ensure that however it is constructed it would not create any water problems in the area.
Councilmember Duggan, when looking at the cost to Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane
(East) of an assessment of $8,850, asked if that is the highest assessment that has been passed on to
residents. City Engineer Mazzitello replied that in his tenure as a Public Works Director this is the
highest assessment. However, he believes that there was a one - hundred percent assessment of a
previous project but that was prior to his being with the city. Councilmember Duggan asked why this
one is so high. City Engineer Mazzitello answered that one of the reasons is the sheer extent of the
repair and a second reason is the larger lots.
page 10
Councilmember Povolny asked if surmountable curbs are installed and water problems ensue, would the
residents be re- assessed to put the barrier curbs in to fix any water issues. City Engineer Mazzitello
replied that surmountable curb does allow for some storm drainage. A barrier curb provides better storm
drainage. There are portions along Hunter and Orchard that absolutely need to have barrier curb
because of drainage issues.
Mayor Krebsbach asked if there is a difference in cost in the types of curbs in terms of this initial
construction. City Engineer Mazzitello replied that the cost between the two different types of curbs
would be negligible. Assistant Engineer Ruzek stated that a surmountable curb is approximately fifty
cents more per foot.
Councilmember Vitelli expressed his desire that the Councilmembers keep in mind the reasons listed in
support of a barrier curb; catch more water runoff, consistent with other city streets, provides a better
snow plow path, and reduces damage to lawns from plowing activities. He sees no reason for deviating
from city standards.
Mayor Krebsbach opened the public hearing for the Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Street
Improvement Project.
Assistant Engineer Ruzek referenced a letter received from Mr. Lawrence Culligan, 1941 Glenhill Road,
requesting that his lot be excluded from the assessment roll. Staffs response is that this would be an
item that would be addressed at the assessment hearing.
A second letter received was from Wes Cutter and Joyce Paxton, 1169 Veronica Lane, stating that they
wish for a wider road, up to thirty-six feet wide. They desire rain gardens. They requested the city take
down some of the hill for safety reasons. They prefer the surmountable curb.
Ms. Carol Adams, 1991 Hunter Lane, stated that she lives at the bottom of the hill and has had water in
her yard from it rushing down Hunter Lane. She is strongly in favor of barrier curb. She believes that
the widening of the road would only increase the amount of water and that surmountable curb would
cause worse problems for those residents living at the bottom of the hill.
Mr. John Mathisrud, 1860 Hunter Lane, would not like to see any bump out curbs. He does not believe
there is a speed problem. He is fine with the barrier curbs.
Mr. George Kinkead, 1905 Hunter Circle, pointed out that coming over the top of the hill with the wider
streets he is concerned with the speed of traffic. Living at the bottom of the hill, it is very difficult to see
the cars when coming out of his driveway.
Mr. Paul Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, stated that if the roadway gets to be thirty feet, that would be four
additional feet on each side. His property is at a higher elevation and he asked how the engineering
department is going to address that problem. He also asked what is the city's definition of a unit.
page 11
Mr. Katz, in regards to a graphic that showed a thirty foot section with a 4:1 grade, asked how that
would be handled on Hunter Lane. Currently there is a ditch between the roadway and his property and
that fills up with water during a large rain, and there are small culverts that go under the driveways.
Mr. Stephen Hunter, corner of Orchard Place and Hunter, asked how the narrowing of an entire section
of road will slow down traffic rather than just narrowing at an intersection. It is already difficult for two
cars, one from each direction, and a walker or cyclist to pass each other. He stated he had no preference
for curb or street width.
Ms. Vicki Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, expressed her concern on the width of the street and does not feel
anything should be done that would encourage parking on the street. She also believes that the hill is
extremely treacherous. She would prefer the road be as narrow as possible and would prefer the
surmountable curb. She also believes that cutting down the hill some with sewers installed would
change the water flow down on the other end.
Ms. Martha Whitcomb, 1200 Culligan Lane, asked if the street widths and curbs would be the same
where East and West Culligan come together.
Mr. Charles Campion, 1836 Hunter Lane, has been looking for a new road since he moved in seventeen
years ago. He likes the character of the neighborhood and the narrow road and he does not see a speed
problem. He believes that surmountable curb with storm sewers would solve the water problems.
Ms. Mary Magnuson, 1831 Hunter Lane, would support any road width that would help to control
speed. Her mailbox gets taken out every other winter or so because of the speeds coming around the
curve. She is also concerned that the surmountable curb would be insufficient to accommodate the
water run -off in the area. She asked how engineering would deal with the widening of the roadway in a
manner that would be equitable.
Mr. John Dougherty, 1933 Hunter Lane, explained that there are problems associated with surmountable
curbs. His father has tripped over that type of curb. He has had to replace his irrigation system four
times and there are issues with plowing in the area. In regards to the width of the road, he asked why he
would want his corner lot to be five and one -half feet narrower on one side than on the other.
Ms. Becky Dougherty, 1933 Hunter Lane, feels that the barrier curbs will deal with the water run -off
better. She does not think that by narrowing Hunter at the point they plan is going to solve the
synagogue parking and that increasing the width of Hunter in other areas is going to solve all of the
parking problems.
Mr. Jay Phillips, 1127 Orchard Place, in regards to mowing, he believes that people need to go into the
road because they have this rather large hill. He does not see how a barrier curb will reduce the grass
clippings in the roadway. He also commented that Hunter seems to have more of a drainage issue
because of the grade of the hill. He knows there is still drainage on Orchard Place that needs to be
considered but believes that surmountable curb would be less necessary for those drainage issues and
would be in favor of that. He sees a lot of cars speeding. He does not see how making it wider or adding
a bump out is going slow them down to any degree.
page 12
Mr. Scott Van, 1870 Hunter Lane, mentioned that he and others were unhappy with the condescending
tone at times at the previous neighborhood meeting. The survey he was given only had three options for
their street; thirty -three feet wide with parking on both sides, thirty-foot wide with parking on one side,
or twenty -eight foot wide and no street parking. He does not feel there are any parking problems and
does not want to limit parking.
He is in favor of a twenty -six foot wide street with surmountable curb, except for the areas where classic
curbing would be needed and where the drains are for the storm sewer. He believes that a thirty-six foot
wide street near the synagogue is excessive. He also does not care for the look of bump outs with the
extra striping. He also believes that narrowing streets at an intersection is unwise because long vehicles
such as school buses and fire trucks need the extra room to make the turns. He encouraged his
neighbors to go look at wider streets and determine if that is what they really want coming down Hunter
Lane. He also addressed the surmountable curb versus barrier curb, drainage issues, bicycles, and speed.
Mr. Paul Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, returned and asked when and how the residents who live on these
streets would receive additional feedback based on the opinions and questions brought forward this
evening so they can assess what the expectations would be.
Mayor Krebsbach stated the public hearing could be closed this evening or be extended. However,
when the public hearing is closed the Council will make a motion to either accept the engineers report
and for them to start working with the specifications; or Council would give staff direction of how they
should modify their plan to accommodate the residents. Then there would be a second informational
community meeting in January, February, or March 2013 for the residents to see what design plans staff
has come up with. It would then come before the Council to order the project, which is anticipated to be
in April 2013. The public hearing this evening is a key event for the Council to hear what the residents
are saying and to give direction to staff.
Councilmember Duggan suggested that since there have been lots of questions raised, he would not
close the public hearing until he has answers that he can absorb. He feels that staff needs time to
address the questions raised and show what the area would look like if various options were completed.
From his viewpoint, the main issues are getting rid of the drainage problem, speed issues, and rural
esthetics.
Mr. John Apitz, 1831 Hunter Lane, stated he understands what they are doing and it makes sense. He
hoped that staff would take into consideration the issue of passing a parked vehicle at the top of the hill
because of the inability to see on- coming traffic. He suggested that the street be bumped in a little to
break up the visual on the straightaway. He also mentioned that the synagogue needs the parking areas.
Generally, he is in favor of the project.
Mr. Tim Murphy, 1916 Hunter, proposed that twenty -six feet is a wider street and his preference is a
surmountable curb; however, he believes that the drainage issues should be addressed first.
Mr. Mike Kurtz, 1827 Hunter Lane, agrees with a lot of the things that have been said and he hopes that
staff will be able to tell the residents how wide the road is going to be. He is in favor of the
surmountable curb and does not understand why they cannot have barrier curb on the corners. He does
not believe there are parking issues on Orchard the bump outs are not very pleasing.
page 13
Mr. Jay Phillips, 1127 Orchard Place, returned saying that in the earlier neighborhood meeting a lot of
these same comments came forth about the beauty of the neighborhood and Mr. Mazzitello stated that
every neighborhood says that.
Mayor Krebsbach asked for staff to comment on the questions and issues raised, making note that the
public hearing was still open.
City Engineer John Mazzitello stated that he has taken down notes from each of the public presenters
this evening and would like to quickly address the questions asked of staff and not rebut statements.
• Drainage in the yard at 1991 Hunter, this is part of this project and is something staff intends to
address within the design, once staff gets to that point
• Grade changes west to east as one traverses across Hunter Lane — that too is something staff is fully
intending on incorporating into the design, drainage is one of the biggest issues with this project and
handling of the storm water is of the upmost importance
• What is a unit — each lot that has a driveway that accesses the improved road is considered a unit
• Width of the curb on Culligan Lane — staff is currently proposing a thirty -foot width the for the east
side of Culligan Lane. Assistant Engineer Ruzek stated that the width of the existing urban section,
curb and gutter of Culligan is thirty feet so staff would match the curb style and width of that road.
• Road narrowing behavior and how varying curb widths are supposed to slow cars down — the driver
is looking ahead and they see the curb narrowing and the white fog line stripe inside of the curb
narrowing the roadway, which calls to the drivers attention. The instinctive reaction of the driver is
to slow down. Data has been collected from First Avenue and Wagon Wheel where this technique
has been used, and the data shows that these systems do slow vehicle traffic.
• Width of the curve — staff is proposing twenty -seven feet; however, through the course of the design
staff will run turning movements for vehicles to make sure that is adequate to get vehicles around
that corner
• Shifting in the right -of -way where the road is going to sit — the city typically likes to put the road
sections dead center within the right -of -way. There is a sixty -foot right -of -way for Hunter and
Orchard so there is thirty feet of city property on either side of the center line. If this were to result
in a grading challenge or some design challenge, staff may look at moving it off the center line one
way or the other. It is the intent with the initial proposal to keep the section in the center of the
right -of -way unless directed otherwise.
• Plows and sprinklers — the topic was brought up about Woodridge Drive on the north side of town.
This is the only street in the city built with surmountable curb. Each spring the public works
department goes out and repairs landscape damage from snow plow activity that has taken place
over the winter.
• Will a wide section solve the parking problem — looking at the dimensions used to design roads,
thirty feet is the narrowest that will still accommodate on- street parking; going narrower than thirty
feet would necessitate the prohibition of on- street parking. Coupled on top of that is the public
safety opinion of the road widths received from the fire department and the police department.
o Councilmember Vitelli asked if the street is narrower than thirty feet would that mean that
parking would not be allowed only on one side of the street or would it mean no parking at all.
City Engineer Mazzitello replied that there would be no parking on either side
page 14
• City Engineer Mazzitello did make one response to comments about the tone at the September 17th
neighborhood meeting — this is the very first time anyone on city staff has heard anything negative
about that meeting. Everyone was very professional and adult at that meeting and staff feels that it
went very well.
• Feedback and timeframe — if everything follows the proposed schedule, after the public hearing is
closed this evening, staff is asking Council to vote to order the project. Staff would proceed with the
design according to the parameters the Council sets.
In regards to the slope of the hill, Assistant Engineer Ruzek stated that there will be limitations there.
They would be getting into levels of engineering that is not addressed at this stage.
Mr. Mike Kurtz, 1827 Hunter Lane, returned to address the thirty foot width. He stated that he called
five engineers. They are putting in a new phase in Woodbury; 20,000 single family lots, surmountable
curbs, and unlimited parking on both sides on twenty -eight feet wide streets.
Mr. Paul Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, asked if the Council would be amiable to having the engineering staff
create a few more options for the residents to take a look at.
Mayor Krebsbach replied that she thought that would be a great idea.
Councilmember Vitelli replied that he believes the Council could look at different options and make a
decision with the information provided.
Mr. Katz commented that residents are part of the community, they pay their taxes, and believed the
residents should have the right to continue this process in an orderly fashion.
Councilmember Duggan reminded City Engineer Mazzitello of questions that were missed; of which he
answered as follows:
• Keeping even widths throughout the project
o Was covered when he replied about the road narrowing concept.
• Speed limit of twenty -five miles per hour
o That is something that would need to be reviewed by the traffic safety committee. He does not
believe it is out of the question because this is not a municipal state aid road. Before making a
proposal to lower the speed limit, staff would want to get full surveys with the speed cart of
exactly what speeds the cars are traveling.
• To widen the road in some areas, lots of fill would be needed. Has that cost been built into the
project?
o That is something that staff would be looking at in the final design stage.
• Several of the home owners might lose two, three, four, five feet of their lot frontage
o Staff is not proposing to take any additional right -of -way at this time. The area between the road
and the property line is city right -of -way.
Since Council has heard lots of ideas from the neighborhood and has a very competent engineering staff,
Mayor Krebsbach asked that Council to join her in directing the staff to take a look at the suggestions.
page 15
Councilmember Duggan agreed to continue the public hearing until such time as staff is able to come up
with an engineering drawing delineating a twenty -six foot wide, a thirty foot wide, and thirty -three foot
wide so Council can have comparisons throughout the project. He would also like to see larger maps.
City Engineer Mazzitello replied that one of the challenges with this project is that staff does not have a
clear consensus from the neighborhood.
Councilmember Vitelli commented that this is a contentious subject and that he feels that as a Council
they should not continue the hearing because they have heard a lot of diverse opinions. Should the
hearing remain open and everyone gathers again, the Council would hear again the same opinions that
were given this evening. He suggested the Council begin to formulate some compromise that seems to
satisfy people and then move ahead with it. Councilmember Vitelli proposed, after hearing all of the
comments this evening, that there be no bump outs installed, no narrowing of the street at the ninety-
degree curve, to have a twenty -nine foot wide street with parking allowed on one side, and to install a
barrier curb due to the water run -off problems and issues.
Mr. Paul Katz, 1855 Hunter Lane, stated that the residents are not asking to come back at a future date.
He does not believe there should be any bump outs, the road should be as narrow as possible, and he
would like the surmountable curb.
Ms. Carol Adams, 1991 Hunter Lane, returned and stated that she has not heard any new ideas at this
meeting. She expressed her desire for the Council to make a decision tonight.
Mayor Krebsbach asked engineer staff to take into consideration what was heard collectively and give
Council a design of what that might be like. The Council would look at that proposal next week; or
Council could close the public hearing and see if there are enough votes to give staff direction; or
Council could give staff direction to give another proposal for them to look at before voting in the
proj ect.
Councilmember Petschel asked if the process were delayed, would Council be putting the project in
jeopardy again — as on the Wagon Wheel project. City Engineer Mazzitello replied that the reason staff
holds to the schedule that they do is it is their desire to bid these projects in the spring. Should the
process be delayed and the project is bid later in the year, there is not as much interest in the project and
the pricing is not as good — traditionally.
City Engineer Mazzitello stated that staffs' recommendation to the Council would be to provide staff
with the parameters to go ahead and design the project and order it tonight. It does not have to be what
staff proposed, but they would like to start the design with the ordering of the project.
Councilmember Petschel expressed her reasons for desiring barrier curb throughout the city, mainly for
run -off and storm water control issues. She is open to street widths narrower than thirty feet. She would
like for staff to look at the twenty -seven width at the curve to ensure safety.
Councilmember Povolny stated he believes there should be a compromise on the street widths and he is
in favor of the barrier curb because of the terrain.
page 16
Councilmember Duggan stated that the resolution, in the NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, item
number two reads "That the city engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and
specifications for said improvement" — could the phrase "in light of the practical and realistic concerns
raised on October 2, 2012 ". City Attorney Tami Diehm stated that she was fine with the language in the
resolution or as an informal direction. City Administrator Miller suggested that it not be in the
resolution because it leaves it open to interpretation.
Councilmember Vitelli suggested the same proposal as he mentioned before; 1) that there be no bump
outs installed, 2) no narrowing of the street at the ninety- degree curve, 3) to have a twenty -nine foot
wide street with parking allowed on one side, and 4) to install a barrier curb due to the water run -off
problems and issues. He then asked the Council for their opinion.
Mayor Krebsbach stated that she could support items one and two; she still likes the twenty -eight foot
wide streets and surmountable curb with some barrier curb where necessary.
Mr. Scott Van, 1870 Hunter Lane, asked where the stormwater run -off is directed to. City Engineer
Mazzitello replied that the preponderance of the drainage from the Hunter Lane area goes to the pond
behind Veronica Lane and the pond behind City Hall. Orchard drains down towards Lexington, goes
under Lexington, and into the pond there and a little bit of the drainage on Orchard Circle goes into a
stormwater pond there and some of it discharges into the MnDOT right -of -way system. All of the
stormwater in Mendota Heights drains through the pond system and ultimately winds up in either the
Minnesota or Mississippi River.
Councilmember Duggan suggested that Council direct staff to go with a twenty -eight foot width road, no
bump outs, and the intersection of Hunter and Orchard should be wider, no on- street parking, and the
combination of surmountable and barrier curb.
Councilmember Povolny moved to close the public hearing.
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
A resident stated that if there is not going to be any on- street parking the street width should be twenty -
six feet instead of going up to twenty -eight feet with no parking. Residents expressed concerns over no
parking signs.
City Engineer Mazzitello stated that all of the no parking zones are codified within the city code of
ordinances. Currently Hunter Lane is not codified for No Parking because of the anticipation of this
reconstruction project. Upon completion of the project, if the road is of a width that does not allow for
parking it would need to be codified as No Parking when construction is completed and signs would be
put up.
Mayor Krebsbach called for the vote on the motion to close the public hearing.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Each Councilmember then stated their proposals for engineering.
page 17
Councilmember Duggan reiterated his proposal; staff should go with a twenty -eight foot wide road, no
bump outs, and the intersection of Hunter and Orchard should be wider, no on- street parking, and the
combination of surmountable and barrier curb.
Councilmember Povolny proposed barrier curb, twenty -nine foot street width with parking on one side
with the exception of by the synagogue, where parking would be allowed on both sides of the street, and
no bump outs.
Councilmember Petschel proposed no bump outs, twenty -nine foot street width, barrier curb, the safety
of the street width at the curve to be investigated, and the street wide enough for parking by the
synagogue.
Councilmember Vitelli proposed no bump outs, twenty -nine feet wide streets for the entire length of the
street with no narrowing at the curb; however, he does agree with the widened street for parking
between Victoria Curve and Veronica Lane for the synagogue, and barrier curb.
Mayor Krebsbach proposed a combination of surmountable and barrier curbs, would prefer a twenty -
seven foot wide street but if there can be a combination she would support a twenty -eight foot wide
street, no bump outs, should not be narrowed coming around the corner, and supports the wider parking
on both sides up to the end of the synagogue property and across the street.
In reply to Mayor Krebsbach question on whether or not he could have something by the next Council
meeting, City Engineer John Mazzitello stated that he has something right now.
• Councilmembers agreed to eliminate the bump outs.
• Councilmembers have also come to an agreement that the curve should not narrow but should
maintain a constant width throughout the street. Staff will do that to the best of their ability.
• The two points of contention are road width; twenty -seven and twenty -nine feet. If the road is
twenty -seven or twenty -eight feet, parking would need to be eliminated. Parking could work at
twenty -nine feet.
• Curbing decision is three votes for barrier curb and two for combination curb
Since staff needs a four - fifths vote, Mayor Krebsbach asked that staff come back to the Council at the
next meeting. City Administrator Justin Miller replied that he could not confirm that this would be on
the next Council meeting agenda; however, the agenda is published on the city's website the Friday
before the meeting and staff could send out another mailing to the residents informing them of the next
meeting on this topic.
UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS
A) PLANNING CASE 2012 -29, REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GARAGE
GREATER THAN 1200 SQUARE FEET, 1018 OVERLOOK ROAD - DANIEL FLEISCHHAKER
Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek explained that the city currently allows in code a
detached garage up to 1,200 square feet with no special planning requirement needed. The city does
allow a garage to up to 1,500 square feet with a conditional use permit. The applicant had originally
requested a variance to have four doors on this structure; the Planning Commission and the applicant
page 18
discussed that at length and the applicant agreed to table that request until he can bring further detail to
the Planning Commission.
As such, with the conditional use permit, this request for a 1,500 square foot garage is permitted by
code. The Planning Commission looked at findings that the existing garage fit with the character of the
neighborhood and found the images to be helpful. Assistant City Administrator Sedlacek shared images
of the current garage and two images of the proposed garage, one with a hip roof and the other with a
gable roof. Either of the proposed garages fit with the conditional use permit, the question to be brought
back to the Planning Commission at their October meeting is whether or not the applicant will be
allowed to have three doors or get a variance for the fourth door.
Mayor Krebsbach asked why this is before the Council now if it is going to be returned to the Planning
Commission. Assistant Administrator Sedlacek replied that the Planning Commission had a discussion
about this and felt that they wanted to give the maximum flexibility to the applicant. If the applicant
choses to construct this garage with a single door on the new garage, which could be up to twelve feet
wide, the conditional use permit would allow them to move forward on that this year. Essentially the
garage can be permitted under the conditional use permit; the question of the door is something that is
up to the applicant.
Upon a question from Councilmember Vitelli, Sedlacek stated the city does allow on a garage up to
three doors which can be three singles or a double and single. A garage door up to twelve feet is
considered a single and the applicant is requesting two eighteen foot doors.
Mayor Krebsbach asked City Attorney Tami Diehm to clarify why this is before the Council when there
is still a request open at the Planning Commission level. Attorney Diehm explained that there are two
separate requests that are being made; one for a conditional use permit and one for a variance. If the
conditional use permit is granted, the applicant can go ahead and construct the garage. He would just be
limited in the size of the door on the new portion of the garage.
Mr. Daniel Fleischhaker, 1018 Overlook Road, shared photos of his current garage and explained that
the primary reason for the garage door being tabled at the Planning Commission meeting was because of
the recent code change not allowing two double doors on a 1,500 square foot garage. However, there
are other homes in the area that were built before the code change with two double doors.
Councilmember Vitelli asked how the other garages referenced to were permitted to have two double
doors. Assistant Administrator Sedlacek replied that most of the homes referenced were constructed
prior to the code change.
Councilmember Duggan requested to see a comparison of the house size to the proposed garage size.
He also asked, should the conditional permit be issued, when it would be established that it is either a
double doors or the single door. Attorney Diehm replied that procedurally the variance is not before the
Council at this time. The only item before the Council is the conditional use permit, which would
approve the size of the garage. The resolution, if adopted, makes it clear that the approval is for only a
single door.
page 19
Councilmember Vitelli moved Approval of PLANNING CASE 2012 -29, REQUEST FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GARAGE GREATER THAN 1200 SQUARE FEET, 1018
OVERLOOK ROAD - DANIEL FLEISCHHAKER
Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion.
Ayes: 4
Nays: 1 (Duggan)
Mr. Fleischhaker asked if the Council would entertain the idea to change the code to allow for two
double doors on a 1,500 square foot garage. Councilmember Petschel replied that the Council has a full
work plan for the year and garage doors are not on the work plan at this time.
B) PLANNING CASE 2012 -30, REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE
FOR A DETACHED GARAGE GREATER THAN 750 SQUARE FEET,
598 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, ROBERT AND DANIELLE WHEBBE
Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek explained that code allows for a detached garage up to
750 square feet. The applicant was seeking to construct a 1,500 square foot garage as his preferred
option; however, his second option would be a little over 1,000 square feet.
Mr. Whebbe could describe for Council his rationale for requiring the variance; however, the Planning
Commission did not feel that he had necessarily explored all options and encouraged the applicant to
consider things such as an attached garage. There are different code requirements for attaching a garage
but it does allow, in the code, to go up to 1,200 square feet with no additional planning approvals.
Assistant Administrator Sedlacek shared a scale print of the existing house, garage, and driveway. The
intent with the conditional use permit is that the existing garage would be converted into living space, so
there would not be an issue with two garages. He also shared an image of the requested 1,500 square
foot garage with three garage doors on the front.
The Planning Commission had discussion on this item and felt that the conditional use permit was
appropriate and supported the idea of a detached garage up to 750 square feet. After discussion, the
Planning Commission voted to deny the request for a variance to be larger than 750 square feet.
Mayor Krebsbach asked for a summarization of the process the Planning Commission took in making
this recommendation. Assistant Administrator Sedlacek explained they are recommending approval of a
conditional use permit only up to 750 square feet, which is the codified area that can be had for a
detached garage.
Mr. Robert Whebbe, 598 Sibley Memorial Highway, came forward to answer question from the
Council. He stated he is requesting a 1,500 square foot garage. He explained that it had been
recommended to not attach the garage to the roof line of the home due to the added load. Mr. Whebbe
did speak to someone about adding a breezeway from his home to the garage because, as he understands
it, once it is attached, a 1,200 square foot garage would be no problem.
Councilmember Duggan commented that the existing driveway to the existing garage is exceptionally
steep and narrow and it is required for the Whebbe family to back out onto Highway 13, which is quite
page 20
busy. Councilmember Duggan believes that relief of some sort needs to be provided. The new
driveway proposal is an excellent solution to the problem of being able to turn around.
After further discussions in reference to the breezeway it was revealed that it is not part of the request
before the Council. Mayor Krebsbach asked for an explanation of what exactly is Mr. Whebbe
requesting of the Council at this point. Mr. Whebbe is requesting a detached 1,500 square foot garage.
Mayor Krebsbach asked if there were any other garages in the neighborhood that are anywhere near that
size. Mr. Whebbe replied that there is a garage located three blocks away.
Discussions continued in regards to the size of the proposed garage and options were explored with the
applicant. The applicant would prefer the detached 1,500 square foot garage.
Councilmember Petschel commented the applicant is asking for a variance and in order to grant a
variance the applicant needs to show a hardship. She does not see any hardship in this application. The
applicant can build a garage and a large driveway to turn around in.
Councilmembers made suggestions for Mr. Whebbe to consider enabling his request to be considered in
a separate application.
City Administrator Justin Miller clarified for Mr. Whebbe that if he came to the city with an attached
garage and it met with the city ordinance, he would not have to go through the Planning Commission.
He could bring his application directly to staff. Should Mr. Whebbe figure out a way to attach the
garage there might not be as long of a process as was had with this application. Should he request an
attached garage over the 1,200 square feet, up to 1,500 square feet, then he would need to go through a
similar process.
Mr. Whebbe asked, since it is getting late in the season to pour a concrete slab for the new garage, could
he park his vehicle over the winter on the spot where the slab would be poured in the spring. City
Engineer John Mazzitello explained that parking a vehicle on anything other than a paved surface is a
violation of city code and he would need administrative approval or an official variance to do so.
Councilmember Duggan moved Approval of PLANNING CASE 2012 -30, REQUEST FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED GARAGE OF 750 SQUARE FEET, 598
SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY, ROBERT AND DANIELLE WHEBBE
Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Councilmember Petschel moved Denial of PLANNING CASE 2012 -30, REQUEST FOR A
VARIANCE FOR A DETACHED GARAGE GREATER THAN 750 SQUARE FEET BASED ON
THE FINDINGS OF FACTS IN THE RESOLUTION, 598 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY,
ROBERT AND DANIELLE WHEBBE
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
page 21
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Povolny shared his appreciation to City Clerk Lorri Smith for saving the city money on
the recently published edition of the Heights Highlights.
Councilmember Duggan mentioned that Ireland has an event similar to the US Super Bowl called the
All Ireland Final and his home county, Donegal, won their All Ireland Final. He also complimented
Sibley on their 5K with great weather and a very good turnout.
Councilmember Duggan complimented a couple of his neighbors for picking up trash when they walk
around their neighborhoods as it is great civic contribution.
Councilmember Vitelli said again that the Hunter Orchard group was very civil, the Council received
good input, and Council did the right thing this evening.
Councilmember Petschel attended a funeral this week for volunteer firefighter George Lowe. It was
stunning the affect that a single individual could have on a community.
Mayor Krebsbach noted the passing of Dr. Richard Weisbecker, Oral Surgery & Maxillofacial Surgery.
She also wished Mrs. Weinsetter well as she has had some challenges with her heath.
Mayor Krebsbach commended the Council for their dedication and interest in the public hearing, which
was probably one of their most challenging decisions. She expressed her appreciation to staff for their
very professional response and the professional guidance.
ADJOURN
Councilmember Duggan moved to adjourn.
Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion.
Ayes: 5
Nays: 0
Mayor Krebsbach adjourned the meeting at 11:04 p.m.
Sandra Krebsbach
Mayor
ATTEST:
Lorri Smith
City Clerk
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PARKS AND RECREATION MEETING
October 9, 2012
page 22
5b.
The September meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on
Tuesday, October 9, 2012 at Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve.
Chair Levine called to order the parks and recreation commission meeting at 6:30 p.m. The
following commissioners were present: Chair Stephanie Levine, Commissioners Mary McGrory-
Ussett, Ira Kipp, Joel Paper, David Miller, Mike Toth and Pat Hinderscheid. Staff present:
Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek.
Approval of the Agenda
COMMISSIONER LEVINE MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGENDA;
COMMISSIONER HINDERSCHEID SECONDED THE MOTION.
AYES 7: NAYS 0
Introduction of New Commissioner
Chair Levine introduced new Parks and Recreation Commissioner Joel Paper. Commissioner
Paper reported that he is a lifetime resident of Mendota Heights, he and his family are frequent
users of the parks system. His family is also active in youth athletics. Commissioner Paper is
excited to be a part of the commission and to contribute to the community.
Approval of Minutes of September 11, 2012
COMMISSIONER MCGRORY - USSETT MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE MINUTES OF
THE MAY 8, 2012 MEETING; COMMISSIONER TOTH SECONDED THE MOTION.
AYES 7: NAYS 0
Recreation Programmer Update
Mr. Sedlacek recognized Recreation Programmer Teresa Gangelhoff for the many hours put in
this summer for programs; Ms. Gangelhoff will be back of the November meeting. Reviewing
the programmer's report, Mr. Sedlacek noted that the fall field trip was full, residents may call
city hall to be placed on a waiting list.
Recreation Program Review
Mr. Sedlacek explained the agenda materials showing expenses and revenues for recreation
programs offered in 2012. The chart did not include staff costs for Recreation Programmer
MH Parks and Recreation Commission 10 -09 -2012 Page 1
page 23
Teresa Gangelhoff, or parks maintenance costs. The commission had questions about specific
expenses and revenues. Mr. Sedlacek reminded the commission that the materials were a first
draft, and that staff would respond to questions with further detail at the November meeting.
The commission was pleased with the initial report, and would like to find out more about how
programs are selected and evaluated. Commissioners Levine and Paper expressed their interest
in meeting with staff to discuss program evaluation. Staff was asked to define what other
recreation offerings are available to Mendota Heights residents, so that we might be able to
consider what gaps there are in services, and what overlap might exist in current programming.
Mr. Sedlacek reported that the President of Mendota Heights Athletic Association will be
attending the November commission meeting, with a report on their programs. The report will
include basic information such as financials, and participation rates. Commissioners are
encouraged to forward any questions they have to staff prior to the meeting, so MHAA
representatives can be prepared.
Par 3 Update
Mr. Sedlacek provided the September 2012 update for the Par 3 golf course. Through the end of
September the golf course has a positive cash balance of approximately $5,500. Mr. Sedlacek
reviewed the financial reports from the agenda materials, noting that revenues and expenses are
all in line with projections for the year.
Business at the golf course has slowed considerably; cooler temperatures are likely to limit the
number of rounds to be played in October. Clubhouse hours have been limited, and the course
will close when weather conditions are poor.
Mr. Sedlacek thanked Clubhouse Manager Jennifer Zweber for her work in the 2012 season — the
clubhouse manager is a part-time temporary position, averaging 20 hours a week during the golf
season. There is no certainty that Ms. Zweber will return in 2013, so Mr. Sedlacek is working
with her to document ideas, changes and suggestions Ms. Zweber has made during the year. The
commission asked if the city had considered expanding the responsibilities of the clubhouse
manager position to eliminate concern over turnover in the position. Mr. Sedlacek responded
that staff is not opposed to considering alternatives; the current staffing structure has benefits,
such as greater flexibility for filling the schedule.
Planning for 2013 includes improved communication and advertising for youth programs, but
will also include a clearer timeline for hiring, to ensure that we maximize spring business
opportunities.
Parks Maintenance Update
Mr. Sedlacek thanked the commissioners for taking the time to visit parks and to share their
observations for maintenance /improvements. The central observation made by staff after
reviewing the feedback was that response to all of the maintenance /improvement observations
would require additional resources than our current staff has.
MH Parks and Recreation Commission 10 -09 -2012 Page 2
page 24
Mr. Sedlacek ran through a list of comments that had been received over the course of the
summer — all of which had been shared with our parks maintenance staff. In the future, staff will
provide more timely responses that concerns had been heard and /or addressed.
Issues impacting safety in the parks were all addressed by maintenance staff in a timely manner.
However, a number of observations relating to aesthetics were not able to be completed due to
limitations on staff time. Upon hearing the list of issues, the commission discussed how to
prioritize observations and relaying the highest priority items to parks maintenance staff in a
timely manner.
The commission directed staff to maintain an ongoing list of observations from commissioners,
for discussion purposes. Starting with the November meeting, staff will present the list of
observations, the commission will review the list, and discuss priorities for attention.
Commission Comments
Commissioner Toth asked staff to respond to his concern about a large lilac bush at the corner of
Lexington and Wagon Wheel Trail, which limits visibility for drivers on Wagon Wheel Trail
who are turning onto Lexington. Mr. Sedlacek stated that staff had studied the issue — the lilacs
do appear to be within the Dakota County Right of Way. Staff also determined that the lilacs
could be considered a safety issue. Mr. Sedlacek reported that vegetation impacting sight lines is
a common issue; if any citizen made a request, staff can contact Dakota County to work with the
property owner on the matter. The commission felt strongly that Dakota County should be asked
to remove the lilacs within the right of way.
Several commissioners welcomed Mr. Paper to the commission and wished him well.
Commissioner Hinderscheid complimented our parks maintenance staff on the bleacher pad and
bench recently added to Ivy Falls Park.
Commissioner Paper expressed his pleasure to serve on the commission, and shared his view that
Mendota Heights has a wonderful parks system.
Commissioner Levine asked staff to keep tennis nets up for as long as possible, as our
community tennis players will play until the snow flies.
Adjourn
COMMISSIONER MILLER MADE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING;
COMMISSIONER MCGRORY - USSETT SECONDED THE MOTION.
AYES 7: NAYS 0
The meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted by Jake Sedlacek
MH Parks and Recreation Commission 10 -09 -2012 Page 3
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DATE: October 16, 2012
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: John R. Mazzitello, PE, PMP
Public Works Director /City Engineer
page 25
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN
651.452.1850 phone 651.452.8940 fa
www.mendota- heights.com
5c.
SUBJECT: Resolution Supporting Projects Listed in the Draft 2013 -2017 Dakota County
Capital Improvements Plan
BACKGROUND
Every year Dakota County updates their five -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). In
conjunction with these updates, the County asks for resolutions of support from County cities
and townships to present to the County Board at the public hearing where the CIP is formally
adopted. This year's public hearing before the County Board is scheduled for November 8, 2012
at the County Administrative Center in Hastings. A copy of the Draft 2013 -2017 CIP is attached
for your review.
Mendota Heights has no substantial street projects listed in the Draft 2013 -2017 CIP beyond the
recurring markings and signage maintenance items; however, Mendota Heights does have the
following items included in the CIP:
1. the traffic signal at County Road 43 (Lexington Avenue) and Highway 110 is scheduled
for replacement in 2013,
2. The median and crosswalk for County Road 43 (Lexington Avenue) is included as part of
the Safety and Management Projects for 2013, and
3. The County share of storm water funding contributions to the Highway 13 reconstruction
(requested by the City of Mendota Heights) is included in 2015.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends Council adopt the attached Resolution in support of the projects listed in the
2013 -2017 Dakota County CIP.
If Council wishes to implement the Staff recommended action, pass the attached RESOLUTION
2012 - , A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROJECTS LISTED IN THE DRAFT 2013 -2017
DAKOTA COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN by a simple majority vote.
page 26
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2012-
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PROJECTS LISTED IN THE DRAFT
2013 -2017 DAKOTA COUNTY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights values the cooperative working relationship it
has with Dakota County; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights supports the continued improvement of our
regional road network, trails and park system; and is further supportive of the proposed work on
the regional trail network and greenways; and
WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights is also supportive of public safety and storm
water drainage improvements throughout the public right -of -way in the city.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Mendota
Heights, Minnesota supports the efforts of Dakota County to improve public safety,
transportation, storm water drainage, parks, trails, and recreational facilities through the Draft
2013 -2017 Capital Improvement Plan.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 16th day of October, 2012.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
By
Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor
ATTEST:
By
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
2013 - 2017 Transportation Capital Improvement Program - Draft
2013 Construction DRAFT
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT(TO /FROM) PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION
ANNUAL COST
CITY
SHARE
FEDERAL
STATE
COUNTY GRAVEL TAX
STATE AID FORCONST
page 27
COUNTY
OTHER COST Lead Agency
2013 County Funds:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
NEW 5 -41
29 6 -06
NEW 28 -50
28 31 -68
NEW 46 -xx
NEW 80 -20
NEW 90 -03
36
38
39
T -Plan
T -Plan
T -Plan
T -Plan
CSAH 5
CR 6
CR 28
CH31CR64
CSAH 46
CR 80
CR 90
Highway Surface - Gravel
Highway Surface - Gravel
Traffic Control Devices
Bike Trail
Transit Infrastructure
Storm Sewer System Repair
Jurisdictional Classification
Safety and Management Projects
ROW Preservation & Management
At TH 13 & assoc road improvements
At CSAH 73 (Oakdale Ave)
CSAH 63 to existing Amana Trail
Roundabout & 195th Rdwy CP 64 -22
CSAH 23 to CSAH 31
Replace Bridge L -3167
Replace Bridge L -3934
Future Studies /Professional Services
Township Road Distribution
Attorney Reimbursement
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
Spot Locations
Durable Pavement
Construction
ROW Acquisition
Construction
ROW Acquisition
Resurfacing
West of CSAH 47
Over Dutch Creek
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
700,000 -
50,000 -
Markings 300,000 -
400,000 -
60,000 -
300,000 50,000
300,000 -
1,000,000 117,000
1,000,000 450,000
Burnsville 500,000
West St Paul 20,000 9,000
Inver Grove Heights 400,000 -
Farmington 958,400 431,280
Apple Valley /Lakeville 1,500,000 -
Hampton Twp 300,000
Greenvale Twp 300,000 -
500,000 225,000
Townships 20,900 -
209,619
2013 County Funds Subtotal 8,818,919 1,282,280
PROJ LOCATION
700,000 Dakota Co
50,000 Dakota Co
300,000 Dakota Co
400,000 City
60,000
250,000 Dak /Cities
300,000 Dakota Co
883,000 Dakota Co
550,000 Dakota Co
500,000 Dakota Co
11,000 Dakota Co
400,000 IGH lead
527,120 Dakota Co
1,500,000 Dakota Co
300,000 Dakota Co
300,000 Dakota Co
275,000 Dakota Co
20,900 Dakota Co
209,619 Dakota Co
7,536,639
ANNUAL COST
CITY
SHARE
FEDERAL
STATE
COUNTY
STATE AID
GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
FORCONST OTHER COST
2013 County State Aid Highway (CSAH):
44 9-42 CSAH 9 CSAH 60 to Hayes Ave
40 9-46 CSAH 9 CH 2 & 46(Scott Co) to CSAH 70
NEW 14 -27
NEW 14 -28
41 28 -44
NEW 31 -72
NEW 38 -45
54 42 -123
NEW 42 -xx
NEW 46 -41
47 46 -32
45 50 -17
NEW 56 -10
CSAH 14
CSAH 14
CSAH 28
CSAH 31
CSAH 38
CSAH 42
CSAH 42
CSAH 46
CSAH 46
CSAH 50
CSAH 56
At CSAH 73
14th Ave to 3rd Ave
At Elrene, At Mike Collins
At Deerwood Dr.
At Nicollet Ave
Nicollet Ave to Elm Dr (N side)
Flagstaff to Johnny Cake Ridge Rd
At Kenrick Ave (Flash Yellow Arrow)
Replace Bridge 19502, 160th St E
Roundabout at CSAH 60
At Cahill Ave (Flash Yellow Arrow)
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
Construction
ROW Acquisition
Signal Operations
Study
ROW Acquisition
Signal Construction
Signal Reconstruction
Design
Construction
Signal Operations Rev
0.5 mile W of CSAH 47
ROW Acquisition
Signal Operations Rev
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lakeville
Scott Co /Eureka Twp /Lkvl
WSP /IGH
South St Paul
Eagan
Eagan
Burnsville
B'ville /AV
Apple Valley
Lakeville
Marshan /Nininger Twp
Lakeville
Inver Grove Heights
6,300,000
1,983,600
100,000
150,000
100,000
250,000
250,000
300,000
500,000
60,000
600,000
900,000
60,000
2,835,000
99,200
45,000
67,500
45,000
125,000
125,000
135,000
27,000
405,000
27,000
300,000
3,465,000
1,884,400
55,000
82,500
55,000
125,000
125,000
165,000
500,000
33,000
300,000
495,000
33,000
- Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
- Apple Valley
Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
- Dakota Co
2013 CSAH Subtotal 11,553,600 3,935,700
CITY
ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL
PROJ LOCATION
300,000 7,317,900
COUNTY GRAVEL TAX
STATE AID FORCONST OTHER
STATE
COUNTY
COST
2013 County Fund & County State Aid Highway:
58
60
NEW 42 -82 CSAH 42
62
Highway Surface - Bituminous
Intersection Control
At TH 52 interchange Area
CIP Reimbursement to Operations
Design /ROW Acq
Rosemount
3,120,000
265,000
3,675,175
3,219,598
120,000 -
337,000 2,924,675
708,312 -
2,000,000 120,000
120,000 -
371,500 -
1,094,663 -
1,000,000 Dakota Co
25,000 Dakota Co
42,000 Dakota Co
1,416,623 Dakota Co
2013 County Funds & CSAH Subtotal 10,279,773 1,165,312 2,924,675 3,586,163 120,000 - 2,483,623
2013 TOTAL 30,652,292 6,383,292 2,924,675
300,000 10,904,063 120,000 - 10,020,262
2013 - 2017 Transportation Capital Improvement Program - Draft
2014 Construction DRAFT
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX pageCQl7iJ 8
ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST Lead Agency
2014 County Funds:
17 Highway Surface - Gravel
18 Highway Surface - Gravel
19 Traffic Control Devices
20 Bike Trail
21 T -Plan Transit Infrastructure
22 T -Plan Storm Sewer System Repair
23 T -Plan Jurisdictional Classification
24 Safety and Management Projects
25 T -Plan ROW Preservation & Management
29 6 -06 CR 6 At CSAH 73 (Oakdale Ave)
34 6 -07 CR 6 At Robert St (TH 952A)
30 28 -48 CR 28 TH 3 to 0.62 mile east
NEW 32 -77 CSAH 32 At Allison Way (turn lane /bypass lane)
31 73 -18 CR 73 Rsmt /IGH line to CSAH 32
32 43 -32 CR 43 At TH 110
28 31 -68 CH31CR64 Roundabout & 195th St Rdwy Imp
49 80 -12 CSAH 80 CSAH 23 to TH 3
36 Future Studies /Professional Services
38 Township Road Distribution
39 Attorney Reimbursement
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
350,000 - - - - - - 350,000 Dakota Co
Spot Locations 50,000 - - - - - - 50,000 Dakota Co
Durable Pavement Markings 300,000 - - - - - - 300,000 Dakota Co
400,000 - - - - - - 400,000 City
60,000 - - - - - 60,000
300,000 50,000 - - - - - 250,000 Dak /Cities
300,000 - - - - - - 300,000 Dakota Co
1,000,000 117,000 - - - - - 883,000 Dakota Co
1,000,000 450,000 - - - - - 550,000 Dakota Co
Construction West St Paul 200,000 90,000 - - - - - 110,000 Dakota Co
Signal - MnDOT West St Paul 62,500 - - - - - 62,500 Mn DOT
ROW Acquisition Inver Grove Heights 1,056,000 475,200 - - - - - 580,800 IGH
Construction Inver Grove Heights 150,000 67,500 - - - - - 82,500 Dakota Co
ROW Acquisition Inver Grove Heights 440,800 198,400 - - - - - 242,400 Dakota Co
Signal Mendota Heights 125,000 - - - - - - 125,000 Mn DOT
Construction Farmington 6,561,600 2,952,720 - - - - - 3,608,880 Dakota Co
Design (fly /digitize) Eureka /Castle Rock Twps 100,000 - - - - - - 100,000 Dakota Co
500,000 225,000 - - - - - 275,000 Dakota Co
Townships 20,900 - - - - - - 20,900 Dakota Co
218,004 - - - - - - 218,004 Dakota Co
2014 County Funds Subtotal 13,194,804 4,625,820 - - - - - 8,568,984
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FOR CONST OTHER COST
2014 County State Aid Highway (CSAH):
NEW 8 -20 CSAH 8 At CSAH 73 - Roundabout Design West St Paul 100,000 45,000 - 55,000 - -
40 9-46 CSAH 9 CH 2 & 46(Scott Co) to CSAH 70 Construction Scott Co /Eureka Twp /Lkvl 7,012,500 50,000 5,610,000 - 1,220,000 - 132,500 - Dakota Co
NEW 14 -28 CSAH 14 14th Ave to 3rd Ave Design South St Paul 320,000 144,000 - - 176,000 - - -
51 26 -49 CSAH 26 At TH 55 intersection /signal Construction Eagan 625,000 - - - 625,000 - - Eagan
41 28 -44 CSAH 28 At Elrene, At Mike Collins Construction Eagan 400,000 180,000 - - 220,000 - - - Dakota Co
NEW 30 -26 CSAH 30 At CSAH 31 (Pilot Knob Rd) Signal Reconstruction Eagan 300,000 - - - 300,000 - - - Dakota Co
NEW 32 -78 CSAH 32 At I -35W Interchange Construction Burnsville 300,000 - 300,000 - - - Burnsville
NEW 32 -68 CSAH 32 At Nicollet Ave (turn lane) Construction Burnsville 364,000 16,380 327,600 20,020 Dakota Co
NEW 42 -124 CSAH 42 At Pennock Ave Signal Reconstruction Apple Valley 250,000 125,000 - - 125,000 - - Dakota Co
NEW 42 -125 CSAH 42 At Hayes Rd Signal Reconstruction Apple Valley 250,000 125,000 - - 125,000 - - Dakota Co
54 42 -123 CSAH 42 Nicollet Ave to Elm Dr (N side) ROW Acquisition B'ville /AV 1,162,000 104,580 929,600 127,820 Dakota Co
48 47 -39 CSAH 47 Replace Bridge L -3169, 0.1 mile SW of CSAH 85 Vermillion Twp 400,000 - - 200,000 200,000 - - - Dakota Co
45 50 -17 CSAH 50 Roundabout at CSAH 60 Construction Lakeville 5,832,000 1,890,000 1,632,000 2,310,000 - - - Dakota Co
64 38 -44 CSAH 38 TH 77 to Johnny Cake Ridge Rd Concrete Rehabilitation Apple Valley 500,000 - 500,000 - - - Dakota Co
86 -29 CSAH 86 CSAH 47 to TH 52 Design CR, Ran, Sciota, Hampton 408,000 - - - 408,000 - - - e
2014 CSAH Subtotal 18,223,500 2,679,960 8,499,200 200,000 6,711,840 - 132,500 -
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FOR CONST OTHER COST
2014 County Fund & County State Aid Highway:
58 Highway Surface - Bituminous
60 Intersection Control
61 97 -yy Robert Street Improvements
62 CIP Reimbursement to Operations
Construction
3,120,000 - - - 2,000,000 120,000 - 1,000,000 Dakota Co
25,000 - - - - - - 25,000 Dakota Co
West St Paul 400,000 - - 200,000 - 200,000 w St Paul
3,283,990 722,478 - - 1,116,556 - 1,444,956 Dakota Co
2014 County Funds & CSAH Subtotal 6,828,990 722,478 - - 3,316,556 120,000 - 2,669,956
2014 TOTAL 38,247,294 8,028,258 8,499,200 200,000 10,028,396 120,000 132,500 11,238,940
2013 - 2017 Transportation Capital Improvement Program - Draft
2015 Construction DRAFT
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
page 29
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST Lead Agency
2015 County Funds:
17 Highway Surface - Gravel 700,000 -
18 Highway Surface - Gravel Spot Locations 50,000 -
19 Traffic Control Devices Durable Pavement Markings 300,000 -
20 Bike Trail 400,000 -
21 T -Plan Transit Infrastructure 60,000 -
22 T -Plan Storm Sewer System Repair 300,000 50,000
23 T -Plan Jurisdictional Classification 300,000 -
24 Safety and Management Projects 1,000,000 117,000
25 T -Plan ROW Preservation & Management 1,000,000 450,000
NEW 43 -xx CR 43 Storm Sewer Improvements at TH 13 Construction Mendota Heights 50,000
31 73 -18 CR 73 Rsmt /IGH line to CSAH 32 Construction Inver Grove Heights 1,700,600 765,300
33 73 -19 CR 73 135th St /Bonare Path to Rsmt /IGH line Design Rosemount 142,900 64,300
NEW 78 -xx CR 78 235th St /Denmark to TH 3 new align Design Eureka & Castle Rock Twps 122,400 -
49 80 -12 CSAH 80 CSAH 23 to TH 3 ROW Acquisition Eureka /Castle Rock Twps 1,586,800
36 Future Studies /Professional Services 500,000 225,000
38 Township Road Distribution Townships 20,900
39 Attorney Reimbursement 226,724 -
2015 County Funds Subtotal 8,460,324 1,671,600
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
700,000 Dakota Co
50,000 Dakota Co
300,000 Dakota Co
400,000 City
60,000
250,000 Dak /Cities
300,000 Dakota Co
883,000 Dakota Co
550,000 Dakota Co
50,000 Mendota Hgts
935,300 Dakota Co
78,600 Dakota Co
122,400 Dakota Co
1,586,800 Dakota Co
275,000 Dakota Co
20,900 Dakota Co
226,724 Dakota Co
6,788,724
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST
2015 County State Aid Highway (CSAH):
NEW 8 -20 CSAH 8 At CSAH 73 - Roundabout ROW Acquisition West St Paul 100,000 45,000 - - 55,000 - - NEW 14 -28 CSAH 14 14th Ave to 3rd Ave ROW Acquisition South St Paul 800,000 360,000 - - 440,000 - - NEW 30 -19 CSAH 30 AT TH 77 Ramps Signal Reconstruction Eagan 100,440 - - 100,440 - - - Mn DOT
NEW 42 -119 CSAH 42 W. Co line to Chippendale Ave Signal Mgmt System B'ville /AV /Rosemount 1,049,000 94,410 839,200 - 115,390 - - - Dakota Co
NEW 42 -126 CSAH 42 At Southcross Dr Signal Reconstruction Burnsville 250,000 125,000 - 125,000 - - - Dakota Co
NEW 42 -127 CSAH 42 At Gardenview Dr Signal Reconstruction Apple Valley 250,000 125,000 - - 125,000 - - - Dakota Co
54 42 -123 CSAH 42 Nicollet Ave to Elm Dr (N side) Construction B'ville /AV 2,194,575 197,512 1,755,660 - 241,403 - - - Dakota Co
86 -29 CSAH 86 CSAH 47 to TH 52 ROW Acquisition CR, Ran, Sciota, Hampton 2,040,500 - - - 2,040,500 - - - Dakota Co
NEW 86 -xx CSAH 86 TH 3 to CSAH 47 Design Castle Rock, Waterfordsciota 408,000 - - 408,000 - - Dakota Co
53 97 -25 Township Replace Bridge L3234 Lewiston Blvd Construct Bridge 19156 Vermillion Twp 180,000 170,000 - 10,000 - Dakota Co
2015 CSAH Subtotal 7,372,515 946,922 2,594,860 170,000 3,650,733 - 10,000 -
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST
2015 County Fund & County State Aid Highway:
58 Highway Surface - Bituminous 3,120,000 - - 2,000,000 120,000 - 1,000,000 Dakota Co
60 Intersection Control 195,000 85,000 - - 85,000 - 25,000 Dakota Co
62 CIP Reimbursement to Operations 3,349,670 736,927 - - 1,138,888 - - 1,473,855 Dakota Co
2015 County Funds & CSAH Subtotal 6,664,670 821,927 - - 3,223,888 120,000 - 2,498,855
2015 TOTAL 22,497,509 3,440,449 2,594,860 170,000 6,874,621 120,000 10,000 9,287,579
2013 - 2017 Transportation Capital Improvement Program - Draft
2016 Construction DRAFT
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
page 30
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST Lead Agency
2016 County Funds:
17 Highway Surface - Gravel 350,000 -
18 Highway Surface - Gravel Spot Locations 50,000 -
19 Traffic Control Devices Durable Pavement Markings 300,000 -
20 Bike Trail 400,000 -
21 T -Plan Transit Infrastructure - 60,000 -
22 T -Plan Storm Sewer System Repair 300,000 60,000
23 T -Plan Jurisdictional Classification 600,000 -
24 Safety and Management Projects 1,000,000 117,000
25 T -Plan ROW Preservation & Management 1,000,000 450,000
30 28 -48 CR 28 TH 3 to 0.62 mile east Construction Inver Grove Heights 600,000
NEW 32 -xx new CR 32 117th St from CSAH 71 to TH 52 ROW Acquisition Inver Grove Heights 1,000,000 -
33 73 -19 CR 73 135th St /Bonare Path to Rsmt /IGH line ROW Acquisition Rosemount 771,200 347,000
NEW 78 -xx CR 78 235th St /Denmark to TH 3 new align ROW Acquisition Eureka & Castle Rock Twps 612,150 -
49 80 -12 CSAH 80 CSAH 23 to TH 3 Construction Eureka /Castle Rock Twps 5,356,000
NEW 80 -21 CSAH 80 Replace Bridge L -3164 Over un -named creek Eureka /Castle Rock Twps 300,000
35 9 -43 new CR 9 Hayes Ave to CSAH 23 Design Lakeville 450,000 202,500
36 Future Studies /Professional Services 500,000 225,000
38 Township Road Distribution Townships 20,900 -
39 Attorney Reimbursement 235,793
2016 County Funds Subtotal 13,906,043 1,401,500
350,000 Dakota Co
50,000 Dakota Co
300,000 Dakota Co
400,000 City
60,000
240,000 Dak /Cities
600,000 Dakota Co
883,000 Dakota Co
550,000 Dakota Co
600,000 IGH
1,000,000 Dakota Co
424,200 Dakota Co
612,150 Dakota Co
5,356,000 Dakota Co
300,000 Dakota Co
247,500 Dakota Co
275,000 Dakota Co
20,900 Dakota Co
235,793 Dakota Co
12,504,543
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT(TO /FROM) PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST
2016 County State Aid Highway (CSAH):
NEW 8 -20 CSAH 8 At CSAH 73 - Roundabout Construction West St Paul 800,000 36,000 720,000 - 44,000 - - - Dakota Co
NEW 14 -28 CSAH 14 14th Ave to 3rd Ave Construction South St Paul 4,000,000 1,800,000 2,200,000 - - -
55 26 -47 CSAH 26 Roundabout at TH 3 Construction Inver Grove Heights 2,900,000 652,500 - 1,447,500 800,000 - - - Mn DOT
56 70 -xx CSAH 70 W Co line to Laredo Path Bike /Ped Trail Lakeville 250,000 112,500 - 137,500 - - - Scott Co
NEW 86 -xx CSAH 86 TH 3 to CSAH 47 ROW Acquisition Castle Rock, waterford,Sciota 2,040,500 - - - 2,040,500 - - - Dakota Co
2016 CSAH Subtotal 9,990,500 2,601,000 720,000 1,447,500 5,222,000 - - -
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT(TO /FROM) PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST
2016 County Fund & County State Aid Highway:
58 Highway Surface - Bituminous 3,320,000 - - - 2,100,000 120,000 - 1,100,000 Dakota Co
60 Intersection Control 2,200,000 1,087,500 - - 1,087,500 - - 25,000 Dakota Co
86 -29 CSAH 86 East of CSAH 47 to TH 52 Construction CR, Ran, Sciota, Hampton 6,875,000 - - - 3,875,000 - 3,000,000 Dakota Co
62 CIP Reimbursement to Operations 3,416,664 751,666 - - 1,161,666 - 1,503,332 Dakota Co
2016 County Funds & CSAH Subtotal 15,811,664 1,839,166 - - 8,224,166 120,000 - 5,628,332
2016TOTAL 39,708,207 5,841,666 720,000 1,447,500 13,446,166 120,000 - 18,132,875
2013 - 2017 Transportation Capital Improvement Program - Draft
2017 Construction DRAFT
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
page 31
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FORCONST OTHER COST Lead Agency
2017 County Funds:
17 Highway Surface - Gravel 700,000 -
18 Highway Surface - Gravel Spot Locations 50,000 -
19 Traffic Control Devices Durable Pavement Markings 300,000 -
20 Bike Trail 400,000 -
21 T -Plan Transit Infrastructure - - 60,000 -
22 Storm Sewer System Repair 300,000 50,000
23 T -Plan Jurisdictional Classification 600,000 -
24 Safety and Management Projects 1,000,000 117,000
25 T -Plan ROW Preservation & Management 1,000,000 450,000
NEW 32 -xx new CR 32 117th St from CSAH 71 to TH 52 Construction Inver Grove Heights 4,000,000 -
33 73 -19 CR 73 135th St /Bonare Path to Rsmt /IGH line Construction Rosemount 3,124,200 1,405,900
NEW 78 -xx CR 78 235th St /Denmark to TH 3 new align Construction Eureka & Castle Rock Twps 1,734,750 -
36 Future Studies /Professional Services 500,000 225,000
38 Township Road Distribution Townships 20,900 -
39 Attorney Reimbursement 245,225
2017 County Funds Subtotal 14,035,075 2,247,900
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
700,000 Dakota Co
50,000 Dakota Co
300,000 Dakota Co
400,000 City
60,000
250,000 Dak /Cities
600,000 Dakota Co
883,000 Dakota Co
550,000 Dakota Co
4,000,000 Dakota Co
1,718,300 Dakota Co
1,734,750 Dakota Co
275,000 Dakota Co
20,900 Dakota Co
245,225 Dakota Co
11,787,175
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FOR CONST OTHER COST
2017 County State Aid Highway (CSAH):
57 42 -82 CSAH 42 Bridge at TH 52 Construction Rosemount 12,500,000 3,125,000 - - 9,375,000 - - - Dakota Co
NEW 31 -xx CSAH 31 CSAH 28 to Central Pkway Construction Eagan 250,000 - - - 250,000 - - - Eagan
NEW 86 -xx CSAH 86 TH 3 to CSAH 47 Construction Castle Rock, waterfordsciota 6,875,000 - - 3,875,000 - - 3,000,000 Dakota Co
2017 CSAH Subtotal 19,625,000 3,125,000 - - 13,500,000 - - 3,000,000
PROJ NO ROAD SEGMENT (TO /FROM)
CITY COUNTY GRAVEL TAX COUNTY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJ LOCATION ANNUAL COST SHARE FEDERAL STATE STATE AID FOR CONST OTHER COST
2017 County Fund & County State Aid Highway:
58 Highway Surface - Bituminous
60 Intersection Control
62 CIP Reimbursement to Operations
2017 County Funds & CSAH Subtotal
3,320,000 - - 2,100,000 120,000 - 1,100,000 Dakota Co
2,200,000 978,750 - - 1,196,250 - 25,000 Dakota Co
3,484,996 766,699 - - 1,184,899 - 1,533,398 Dakota Co
9,004,996 1,745,449 - - 4,481,149 120,000 - 2,658,398
2017 TOTAL 42,665,071 7,118,349 - - 17,981,149 120,000 - 17,445,573
2013 - 2017 CIP - Parks Capital Improvement Program
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2013 Section
Planning: Park System
Acquisition: Park System
Maintenance: Park System
Greenway Development: MRRTthru SLPR
Park Development: Enhancement
Greenway Development: Enhancement
Greenway Collborative: MN River
Greenway Collaborative: Lake Marion
Greenway Collaborative: General Assistance
Greenway Development: MRRT Interpretive Plan
Parks - Other: Street Assessments
Natural Resources: Base Program
Planning: Greenway System
Acquisition: Greenway System
Maintenance: Greenway System
Park Development: WWRP
Greenway Development: BRRTTrailhead
2014 Section
Planning: Park System
Acquisition: Park System
Park Development: LHRP
Maintenance: Park System
Park Development: Enhancement
Greenway Development: Enhancement
Greenway Collaborative: General Assistance
Natural Resources: Base Program
Greenway Collaborative: MRRT to St. Paul
Planning: Greenway System
Acquisition: Greenway System
Maintenance: Greenway System
Greenway Development: Support Fund
Greenway Collaborative: North Creek Greenway
Greenway Development: BRRTTrailhead
2015 Section
Planning: Park System
Acquisition: Park System
Maintenance: Park System
Park Development: Enhancement
Greenway Development: Enhancement
Greenway Collaborative: General Assistance
Natural Resources: Base Program
Greenway Collaborative: MRRT to St. Paul
Planning: Greenway System
Acquisition: Greenway System
Maintenance: Greenway System
Greenway Development: Support Fund
Greenway Collaborative: North Creek Greenway
PROJECT LOCATION
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Rosemount /Nininger Township
Systemwide
Systemwide
Minnesota River Greenway - Burnsville
Lake Marion Area Trail- Lakeville
Systemwide
MRRT
Lebanon Hills Regional Park
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Whitetail Woods Regional Park
Big Rivers Regional Trail
2013 Totals
ANNUAL
COST
FEDERAL
65,000 -
2,266,666 -
250,000
1,664,000 1,000,000
50,000
90,000
1,250,000 1,000,000
125,000
150,000 -
90,000 -
400,000 -
150,000 -
110,000 -
2,266,666 -
50,000 -
4,700,000 -
75,000
13,752,332 2,000,000
STATE
COUNTY
STATE AID
METRO
SHARE
1,700,000
664,000
250,000
125,000
75,000
125,000
1,700,000
OTHER
page 32
COUNTY TOTAL LIFE Project
COST PROJECT COST Type
4,639,000
65,000
566,666
250,000
50,000
90,000
150,000
15,000
400,000
25,000
110,000
566,666
50,000
4,700,000
75,000
7,113,332
Systemwide
Systemwide
Lebanon Hills Regional Park
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
South St. Paul
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Apple Valley
Big Rivers Regional Trail
2014 Totals
325,000 Planning
11,333,330 Acquisition
1,750,000 Maintenance
1,664,000 Development
250,000 Development
290,000 Development
1,250,000 Development
125,000 Development
750,000 Development
90,000 Planning
400,000 Assessments
750,000 Natural Resources
390,000 Planning
11,333,330 Acquisition
250,000 Maintenance
4,700,000 Development
575,000 Development
65,000 - - - - 65,000 325,000 Planning
2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
1,258,000 - - - 1,258,000 - - 1,258,000 Development
500,000 - - - 250,000 - 250,000 1,750,000 Maintenance
50,000 - - - - 50,000 250,000 Development
50,000 - - - - - 50,000 290,000 Development
150,000 - - - - 150,000 750,000 Development
150,000 - - - 150,000 - 750,000 Natural Resources
300,000 - - - 300,000 - 2,589,000 Development
110,000 - - - - - 110,000 390,000 Planning
2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
50,000 - - - - - 50,000 250,000 Maintenance
464,000 - - - 464,000 - 3,782,000 Development
250,000 - - - 250,000 - 1,900,000 Development
500,000 - - - - - 500,000 575,000 Development
8,430,332 6,072,000 2,358,332
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
South St. Paul
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Systemwide
Apple Valley
2015 Totals
65,000 - - - - 65,000 325,000 Planning
2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
250,000 - - - - 250,000 1,750,000 Maintenance
50,000 - - - - 50,000 250,000 Development
50,000 - - - - - 50,000 290,000 Development
150,000 - - - - 150,000 750,000 Development
150,000 - - 150,000 - 750,000 Natural Resources
2,289,000 1,800,000 - - 489,000 - 2,589,000 Development
110,000 - - - - 110,000 390,000 Planning
2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
50,000 - - - - - 50,000 250,000 Maintenance
175,000 - - 175,000 - 3,782,000 Development
1,650,000 1,000,000 - - 650,000 - 1,900,000 Development
9,522,332 2,800,000 4,864,000 1,858,332
2013 - 2017 CIP - Parks Capital Improvement Program
page 33
PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION ANNUAL FEDERAL STATE COUNTY METRO OTHER COUNTY TOTAL LIFE Project
COST STATE AID SHARE COST PROJECT COST Type
2016 Section
Planning: Park System Systemwide 65,000 - - - - 65,000 325,000 Planning
Acquisition: Park System Systemwide 2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
Maintenance: Park System Systemwide 500,000 - - - 250,000 - 250,000 1,750,000 Maintenance
Park /Grnwy Dev: Master Plan Implementation Location to be determined 1,058,000 - - - 1,058,000 - - 1,058,000 Development
Park Development: Enhancement Systemwide 50,000 - - - - 50,000 250,000 Development
Greenway Development: Enhancement Systemwide 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 290,000 Development
Greenway Collaborative: General Assistance Systemwide 150,000 - - - - 150,000 750,000 Development
Natural Resources: Base Program Systemwide 150,000 - - - 150,000 - - 750,000 Natural Resources
Planning: Greenway System Systemwide 30,000 - - - - 30,000 390,000 Planning
Greenway Collaborative: Vermillion River Hastings 180,000 - - - 180,000 - - 180,000 Development
Greenway Collaborative: North Creek Lakeville 205,000 - - - - 205,000 205,000 Development
Acquisition: Greenway System Systemwide 2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
Maintenance: Greenway System Systemwide 50,000 - - - - 50,000 250,000 Maintenance
Greenway Development: Support Fund Systemwide 1,129,000 - - - 1,129,000 - - 3,782,000 Development
2016 Totals 8,150,332 6,167,000 1,983,332
2017 Section
Planning: Park System Systemwide 65,000 - - - - 65,000 325,000 Planning
Acquisition: Park System Systemwide 2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
Maintenance: Park System Systemwide 250,000 - - - - 250,000 1,750,000 Maintenance
Park Development: Enhancement Systemwide 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 250,000 Development
Greenway Development: Enhancement Systemwide 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 290,000 Development
Greenway Collaborative: General Assistance Systemwide 150,000 - - - - 150,000 750,000 Development
Natural Resources: Base Program Systemwide 150,000 - - - 150,000 - - 750,000 Natural Resources
Planning: Greenway System Systemwide 30,000 - - - - - 30,000 390,000 Planning
Acquisition: Greenway System Systemwide 2,266,666 - - - 1,700,000 - 566,666 11,333,330 Acquisition
Maintenance: Greenway System Systemwide 50,000 - - - 50,000 250,000 Maintenance
Greenway Development: Support Fund Systemwide 2,014,000 1,000,000 - - 1,014,000 - - 3,782,000 Development
2017 Totals 7,342,332 1,000,000 4,564,000 1,778,332
page 34
2013 - 2017 Land Conservation Capital Improvement Program
PROJECT SEGMENT (FROM /TO) PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT ANNUAL FEDERAL STATE ENVIRONMENTAL/ COUNTY TOTAL LIFE
NO. LOCATION COST FNAP FUNDS COST PROJECT COST
2013 Section
FNAP100 Farmland Easements Countywide 1,585,000 1,100,000 - 485,000 - 9,708,400
FNAP101 Natural Area Protection Countywide 1,350,000 1,150,000 200,000 - 5,475,000
FNAP103 Riparian and Lakeshore Buffer Countywide 2,475,000 2,275,000 200,000 - 10,766,965
FNAP104 Easement Stewardship Countywide 55,000 30,000 25,000 - 365,000
Total for 2013 5,465,000 1,100,000 3,455,000 910,000 26,315,365
2014 Section
FNAP100 Farmland Easements Countywide 1,585,000 1,100,000 - 485,000 - 9,708,400
FNAP101 Natural Area Protection Countywide 1,350,000 1,150,000 200,000 - 5,475,000
FNAP103 Riparian and Lakeshore Buffer Countywide 200,000 - 200,000 - 10,766,965
FNAP104 Easement Stewardship Countywide 55,000 25,000 30,000 - 365,000
Total for 2014 3,190,000 1,100,000 1,175,000 915,000 26,315,365
2015 Section
FNAP100 Farmland Easements Countywide 1,585,000 1,100,000 - 485,000 - 9,708,400
FNAP101 Natural Area Protection Countywide 200,000 - 200,000 - 5,475,000
FNAP103 Riparian and Lakeshore Buffer Countywide 2,595,000 2,395,000 200,000 - 10,766,965
FNAP104 Easement Stewardship Countywide 65,000 30,000 35,000 - 365,000
Total for 2015 4,445,000 1,100,000 2,425,000 920,000 26,315,365
2016 Section
FNAP100 Farmland Easements Countywide 1,585,000 1,100,000 - 485,000 - 9,708,400
FNAP101 Natural Area Protection Countywide 1,165,000 965,000 200,000 - 5,475,000
FNAP103 Riparian and Lakeshore Buffer Countywide 200,000 - 200,000 - 10,766,965
FNAP104 Easement Stewardship Countywide 65,000 30,000 35,000 - 365,000
Total for 2016 Countywide 3,015,000 1,100,000 995,000 920,000 26,315,365
2017 Section
FNAP100 Farmland Easements Countywide 1,585,000 1,100,000 - 485,000 - 9,708,400
FNAP101 Natural Area Protection Countywide 200,000 - 200,000 - 5,475,000
FNAP103 Riparian and Lakeshore Buffer Countywide 2,665,000 2,465,000 200,000 - 10,766,965
FNAP104 Easement Stewardship Countywide 75,000 35,000 40,000 - 365,000
Total for 2017 4,525,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 925,000 26,315,365
2013 - 2017 Land Conservation Capital Improvement Program
PROJECT SEGMENT (FROM /TO) PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT ANNUAL
NO. LOCATION COST
FEDERAL
page 35
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL/ COUNTY TOTAL LIFE
FNAP FUNDS COST PROJECT COST
page 36
2013 - 2017 CIP - Byllesby Dam Capital Improvement Program
PROJECT PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION ANNUAL SOIL/ HYDRO METRO OTHER COUNTY TOTAL LIFE LEAD
NO. COST WATER POWER SHARE COST PROJECT COST AGENCY
2013 Section
Byllesby Dam FERC Spillway Upgrade Lake Byllesby 4,000,000 - 2,000,000 - - - 6,500,000 Dakota Co
2014 Section
Byllesby Dam FERC Spillway Upgrade Lake Byllesby 2,300,000 - 800,000 - - - 6,500,000 Dakota Co
2012 - 2016 CIP - Building Capital Improvement Program Summary
PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION
NO.
2013 Section
3404 County Museum
Countywide
Countywide
1028 Countywide
1123 Countywide
1103 Countywide
1163 Countywide
Countywide
1040 Countywide
Empire Transportation Facility
5504 Farmington Library
9606 Government Center
508 Govt Center, Hastings Campus
2003 Inver Glen Library
JDC & NSC
1420 Judicial Center
1416 Judicial Center**
1422 Judicial Center**
Judicial Center
Law Enforcement Center
8822 LEC & JDC
0507 LEC & Judicial Center
8821 LEC & JDC
6505 Northern Service Center
6700 Thompson County Park
2207 Wentworth Library
1042 Wentworth Library
9928 Western Service Center
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Space Needs Assessment
Building Heat Load Calculation Study
Building Interior Fall Protection
Energy Improvements
Miscellaneous Projects
Special Assessment
Stormwater Mgm. Retrofit Projects
Upgrade Generators to EPA regulations
Install Fiber - Hastings /Hwy 61 Bridge
Photovoltaic (PV) System
Renovation
CJIIN Remodeling
Exterior Envelope Inspec., Repairs & Cleaning
Renovation
Data Center Enhancement Project
Renovation
Emergency Operation Center relocation
Restroom Updates
Upgrade Emergency Generator
Renovation and Turnaround - 8100 Unit
Cooling Tower Replacement
Replace Pneumatic Controls
Security Improvements
Space Reconfiguration Evaluation
Maintenance Building
EMS Replacement
Fiber Optic Connection
Emergency Generator
ANNUAL
COST
32,000
40,000
175,000
327,000
125,000
20,000
25,000
50,000
100,000
30,000
500,000
50,000
108,000
1,400,000
30,000
2,650,000
58,000
35,000
500,000
505,000
503,000
1,250,000
338,000
40,000
310,000
143,000
50,000
550,000
page 37
BOND /Other COUNTY TOTAL LIFE Project
PROCEEDS COST PROJECT COST Type
2,650,000
32,000 32,000 Approved
40,000 40,000 New
175,000 175,000 New
327,000 693,000 Revised
125,000 745,000 Continuing
20,000 100,000 Continuing
25,000 225,000 Continuing
50,000 250,000 New
50,000 100,000 Approved
30,000 30,000 New
500,000 1,800,000 Revised
50,000 50,000 Revised
108,000 346,000 Approved
1,400,000 2,100,000 Revised
30,000 850,000 New
3,000,000 Approved
58,000 73,000 Approved
35,000 35,000 Approved
500,000 500,000 New
505,000 550,000 New
503,000 520,000 Revised
1,250,000 1,277,000 Active
338,000 1,240,000 Approved
40,000 40,000 Revised
310,000 310,000 Approved
143,000 143,000 Approved
50,000 50,000 Revised
550,000 550,000 Approved
Total for 2013
9,944,000 2,650,000 7,244,000
Red = New Project Requests
Bold = New request in 2012 Cycle
PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION
NO.
2014 Section
1028 Countywide
1124 Countywide
1104 Countywide
1164 Countywide
Countywide
1043 Dakota Lodge /Inver Glen /Museum
5504 Farmington Library
2600 Galaxie Library
2003 Inver Glen Library
JDC & NSC
1416 Judicial Center
1425 Judicial Center
1405 Judicial Center
7002 Lebanon Hills Park
6902 Spring Lake Park
1421 WSC & Judicial Center
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Energy Improvements
Miscellaneous Projects
Special Assessment
Stormwater Mgm. Retrofit Projects
Upgrade Generators to EPA regulations
Fiber Optic Connection
Renovation
Building Addition
Renovation
Jata Center Enhancement Project
Emergency Operation Center relocation
Replace Chiller
Replace Underground Fuel Tanks
Park Maintenance Building
Park Maintenance Building
Replace Courts Sound System
ANNUAL BOND /Other COUNTY TOTALFFA 38 Project
COST PROCEEDS COST PROJECT COST Type
136,000
185,000
20,000
25,000
200,000
150,000
890,000
142,000
380,000
820,000
15,000
335,000
220,000
2,050,000
1,550,000
20,000
142,000
Total for 2014
7,138, 000 142,000
136,000
185,000
20,000
25,000
200,000
150,000
890,000
380,000
820,000
15,000
335,000
220,000
2,050,000
1,550,000
20,000
6,996,000
2015 Section
Countywide
1125 Countywide
1105 Countywide
1165 Countywide
1021 DCC & Robert Trail Library
2600 Galaxie Library
6801 Miesville Ravine
6506 Northern Service Center
2501 Pleasant Hill Library
1421 WSC & Judicial Center
Engineering Evaluation
Miscellaneous Projects
Special Assessment
Stormwater Mgm. Retrofit Projects
Parking lots - Slurry Seal
Building Addition
Park Maintenance Building
Exterior Envelope Inspec, Repairs & Cleaning
Needs Assessment
Replace Courts Sound System
Refrigerant Phase -out
30,000
185,000
20,000
25,000
60,000
1,363,000
300,000
76,000
35,000
200,000
1,363, 000
30,000
185,000
20,000
25,000
60,000
300,000
76,000
35,000
200,000
Total for 2015
2,294,000
1,363,000 931,000
Red = New Project Requests
Bold = New request in 2012 Cycle
693,000 Revised
745,000 Continuing
100,000 Continuing
225,000 Continuing
250,000 New
150,000 Approved
1,350,000 Approved
5,305,000 Approved
1,800,000 Approved
850,000
73,000 Approved
335,000 Approved
220,000 Approved
2,050,000 Approved
1,550,000 Approved
220,000 Approved
30,000 New
745,000 Continuing
100,000 Continuing
225,000 Continuing
60,000 Approved
5,305,000 Approved
300,000 Approved
194,000 Approved
35,000 Approved
220,000 Approved
PROJECT PROJECT LOCATION
NO.
2016 Section
1126 Countywide
1106 Countywide
1166 Countywide
2600 Galaxie Library
1423 Judicial Center**
1410 Judicial Center **
6506 Northern Service Center
2502 Pleasant Hill Library
9922 Western Service Center
9923 Western Service Center
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Miscellaneous Projects
Special Assessment
Stormwater Mgm. Retrofit Projects
Building Addition
Boiler Replacement
Freight Elevator Replacement
Exterior Envelope Inspec, Repairs & Cleaning
Renovation
Boiler Replacement
HCFC Room Purge
ANNUAL BOND /Other COUNTY TOTALFFA 39 Project
COST PROCEEDS COST PROJECT COST Type
185,000 185,000
20,000 20,000
25,000 25,000
3,800,000 3,800,000
290,000 290,000
75,000 75,000
118,000 118,000
960,000 960,000
265,000 265,000
89,000 89,000
Total for 2016
5,827,000 3,800,000 2,027,000
2017 Section
1126
1106
1166
Countywide
Countywide
Countywide
Heritage Library
Miscellaneous Projects
Special Assessment
Stormwater Mgm. Retrofit Projects
Needs Assessment
185,000
20,000
25,000
185,000
20,000
25,000
Total for 2017
265,000
265,000
GRAND TOTAL 2013 -2017
25,468,000 7,955,000 17,463,000
** Timed with other larger project
Red = New Project Requests
Bold = New request in 2012 Cycle
745,000 Continuing
100,000 Continuing
225,000 Continuing
5,305,000 Approved
290,000 Approved
75,000 Approved
194,000 Approved
1,600,000 Approved
265,000 Approved
89,000 Approved
745,000
100,000
225,000
9/10/12 KMG
Continuing
Continuing
Continuing
page 40
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 5511
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota- heights.com
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
October 16, 2012
Mayor and City Council
Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director
Insurance Renewal
BACKGROUND
Each year LMCIT requires the city to decide if we wish to purchase additional liability coverage
and a waiver of monetary limits on the claims. The base coverage is $1,500,000 which is the
basic statutory limit. In the past, we have not purchased additional coverage and elected not to
waive the statutory tort limits. Our insurance coverage period runs November 1, 2012 to
November 1, 2013. I have attached the liability coverage waiver form.
BUDGET IMPACT
N/A
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council pass a motion to not purchase
additional liability coverage and elect not to waive the statutory tort limits.
page 41
SECTION 1: LIABILITY COVERAGE WAIVER FORM
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust muatdecide
whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The
decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects:
If the city does not waive the statutory tort lindo, an individual claimant would be able to recover no
more than $500.000. on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants
would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be
limited to$1.50O.00O. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or notthe city
purchases the optional excess liability coverage.
If the city waives the statutoiy to Iimits and does not purchase excess Iiability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover up to $1,500,000. on a single occurrence. The total which alt
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to $1 500,000., regardless of the number of claimants.
If the city waives the statuto to Iimits and purchases excess Iiability coverage, a single claimant
could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which alt
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal to limits do not apply are not affected by this decision.
This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and
return this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact
LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney.
accepts liability coverage limits of $ from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT).
Check one:
The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by
Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04,
to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT.
Date of city council meeting
Position
Signature Position
Return this. completed form to LMCIT 145 University Ave. W� St. Paul, MN. f5/03-2044
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 42
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota- heights.com
DATE: October 16, 2012
TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
FROM: Assistant Fire Chief Dave Dreelan
SUBJECT: September Fire Synopsis
Fire Calls
The department responded to 23 calls for the month. The majority of calls were classified as false
alarms or as good intent calls. Seven calls were commercial in nature, of the other calls, five were
residential calls, four were EMS calls, there were two vehicle fires, one grass fire and one elevator
rescue.
Monthly Department Training
5e.
The monthly department training was a SCBA confidence drill that forced the firefighters to try and
better balance the amount of tasks they can complete on the fire ground verses the amount of air they
have remaining in their SCBA. Traditionally firefighters wait until their low alarm sounds on their SCBA
before exiting a hazard. This practice leaves little room for error if something goes wrong on the way
out of the hazard. The training forced the firefighters to be more "air aware" and exit the structure
before their alarms sounded.
Monthly Squad Training
The squad training for the month was our annual Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) training.
Firefighters reviewed emergency procedure related to their SCBA such as low air emergencies, SCBA
malfunctions, air consumption rates, and SCBA disentanglement procedures.
MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT
SEPTEMBER 2012 MONTHLY REPORT
FIRE CALLS NO. 12142 - 12164
NUMBER OF CALLS: 23
page 43
FIRE ALARMS DISPATCHED: NUMBER
ACTUAL FIRES
Structure - MH Commercial
Structure - MH Residential
Structure - Contract Areas
Vehicle - MH 2
Vehicle - Contract Areas
Grass /Brush /No Value MH
Grass /Brush /No Value Contract
MEDICAL
Assist 6
Extrication
HAZARDOUS SITUATION
Spills /Leaks
Arcing /Shorting
Chemical
Power Line Down
FALSE ALARM
Residential Malfunction 2
Commercial Malfunction 4
Unintentional - Commercial 2
Unintentional - Residential 1
Criminal
GOOD INTENT
Smoke Scare 2
Steam Mistaken for Smoke
Other 4
MUTUAL AID
TOTAL CALLS 23
STRUCTURE CONTENTS MISC. TOTALS TO DATE
$61,000
TOTAL MONTHLY FIRE LOSSES
$0 $61,000 $0
$28,000
$10,120
$16,000
$61,300
$0
FIRE LOSS TOTALS MENDOTA HEIGHTS
ALL FIRES, ALL AREAS (MONTH)
$61,000 $115,420
MEND. HTS. ONLY STRUCT /CONTENTS
MEND. HTS. ONLY MISCELLANEOUS
MEND. HTS. TOTAL LOSS TO DATE
$38,120
$300
$38,420
LOCATION OF FIRE ALARMS: TO DATE
MENDOTA HEIGHTS 18 141
MENDOTA 1 2
SUNFISH LAKE 1 7
LILYDALE 3 12
OTHER 0 2
TOTAL
23 164
LAST YEAR
122
0
17
17
8
164
BILLING FOR SERVICES
AGENCY THIS MONTH TO DATE
MN /DOT $0
MILW. RR $0
CNR RR $0
OTHERS:
TOTALS:
$0
$0 $0
WORK PERFORMED HOURS TO DATE LAST YEAR
FIRE CALLS 391.5 2756.5 3033
MEETINGS 36 321.5 358.5
DRILLS 161 1371.5 1307
WEEKLY CLEAN -UP 35 320.5 306
SPECIAL ACTIVITY 212.5 1601.5 1722.75
ADMINISTATIVE 0 0 0
FIRE MARSHAL 92.5 574 368
TOTALS 928.5 6945.5 7095.25
FIRE MARSHAL'S TIME FOR MONTH
INSPECTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
RE- INSPECTION
MEETINGS
ADMINISTRATION
SPECIAL PROJECTS
TOTAL
19
0
12
2
7
52.5
92.5
REMARKS:
SEE OTHER SIDE FOR SYNOPSIS
e 44
1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota `igfi , MN
651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fa
www.mendota- heights.com
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF
M ENDOTA HEIGHTS
BACKGROUND
October 9, 2012
Parks and Recreation Commission, Mayor and City Council
Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator
Par 3 Update — September 2012
The Par 3 Golf Course finished the month of September 2012 with expenditures slightly ahead of
revenues, bringing net revenue to just over $5,000.
Revenues for the month fell slightly behind greens fees for September 2011, but expenditures for
the same period were considerably less.
Course revenues year -to -date are even with the same period for 2011. Improvements in walk -up
rounds have offset losses in recreation programs.
Clubhouse hours have been cut back in the mornings — we currently open at 10:00 a.m. on
weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. on weekends. The clubhouse manager has been authorized to close the
clubhouse depending upon traffic and weather conditions.
Clubhouse Manager Jen Zweber and I have met to discuss the 2012 season, and are revising
programs, special offers and the communications plan, as well as policies and procedures.
MAINTENANCE UPDATE
Maintenance operations are winding down, and turf conditions at the course are good.
Maintenance staff aerated greens and tee boxes and will continue mowing as long as it is
necessary. Winterization will include treating greens for snow mold and applying sand, having
the irrigation system blown out and removing cutting heads from the Tee Mower, Fairway
Mower and Greens Mower.
BUDGET IMPACT
The attached monthly expenditure report shows revenues and expenditures through the end of
September. The course has taken in $141,205 in revenues; expenditures for this period total
$135,632. This results in net revenue over expenditure of $5,573 year to date.
Page 1 of 1
MONTHLY EXPENDITURE REPORT
SEPTEMBER 2012
page 45
MENDOTA HEIGHTS PAR 3
BUDGET TO ACTUAL REPORT
September 2012 (75% OF YEAR)
REVENUES
SEPTEMBER
YTD
YTD
BUDGET
2012
2012
%
GREENS, LEAGUE & TOURN FEES
$120,000
$10,902
$94,221
78.52%
RECREATION PROGRAMS
$45,000
$0
$28,315
62.92%
CONCESSIONS
$22,000
$1,976
$18,586
84.48%
SUNDRY REVENUE
$100
$0
$83
83.00%
INTEREST
$500
$0
$0
0.00%
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
PAR 3 FUND REVENUE TOTAL
$187,600
$12,877
$141,205
75.27%
EXPENDITURES
SEPTEMBER
YTD
YTD
BUDGET
2012
2012
%
CLUBHOUSE SALARIES
$47,500
$4,087
$34,324
72.26%
ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES
$21,588
$1,666
$16,569
76.75%
FICA/PERA
$8,596
$756
$6,221
72.37%
MEDICAL INSURANCE
$5,702
$406
$3,655
64.11%
U/E & W/C INSURANCE
$5,920
$0
$6,337
107.04%
RENTALS
$1,300
$0
$1,353
104.11%
UTILITIES
$9,550
$1,154
$6,480
67.85%
PROFESSIONAL FEES - AUDIT
$2,365
$0
$2,365
100.00%
PROF FEES - CONSULTING FEES
$300
$0
$525
175.00%
PROF FEES - GROUNDS MGMT
$14,000
$2,000
$11,000
78.57%
PROF FEES - GROUNDS WAGES
$20,000
$3,287
$16,993
84.97%
PROF FEES - TREE MAINTENANCE
$2,000
$0
$962
48.09%
ADVERTISING /NEWSLETTER
$600
$0
$397
66.18%
LIABILITY /AUTO INSURANCE
$3,000
$0
$2,641
88.03%
OPERATING COSTS /SUPPLIES
$10,500
$870
$6,977
66.45%
FUEL
$1,500
$283
$2,073
138.23%
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE
$13,200
$1,166
$12,741
96.52%
SUNDRY /DUES /MILEAGE /CLOTHING
$1,660
$133
$2,026
122.06%
CAPITAL OUTLAY
$5,000
$0
$0
0.00%
ONLINE REG & CREDIT CARD FEES
$0
$350
$1,993
0.00%
PAR 3 EXPENDITURES TOTAL
$174,281
$16,158
$135,635
77.83%
10/2/2012
MENDOTA HEIGHTS PAR 3
Budget Performance Comparison
September 2011 and 2012
REVENUES September September YTD YTD
2011 2012 2011 2012
GREENS, LEAGUE & TOURN FEES $12,766 $10,902 $86,999 $94,221
RECREATION PROGRAMS $0 $0 $34,804 $28,315
CONCESSIONS $2,635 $1,976 $19,374 $18,586
SUNDRY REVENUE $0 $0 $97 $83
INTEREST $0 $0 $0 $0
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS $0 $0 $0 $0
PAR 3 FUND REVENUE TOTAL $15,401 $12,878 $141,274 $141,205
EXPENDITURES September September YTD YTD
2011 2012 2011 2012
CLUBHOUSE SALARIES $8,174 $4,087 $38,912 $34,324
ADMINISTRATIVE SALARIES $1,518 $1,666 $10,954 $16,569
FICA/PERA $1,254 $756 $6,194 $6,221
MEDICAL INSURANCE $135 $406 $1,973 $3,655
U/E & W/C INSURANCE $0 $0 $7,351 $6,337
RENTALS $51 $0 $1,404 $1,353
UTILITIES $1,105 $1,154 $5,887 $6,480
PROFESSIONAL FEES - AUDIT $0 $0 $2,300 $2,365
PROF FEES - CONSULTING FEES $0 $0 $525 $525
PROF FEES - GROUNDS MGMT $9,043 $2,000 $29,007 $11,000
PROF FEES - GROUNDS WAGES $0 $3,287 $0 $16,993
PROF FEES - TREE MAINTENANCE $0 $0 $0 $962
ADVERTISING /NEWSLETTER $0 $0 $373 $397
LIABILITY /AUTO INSURANCE $0 $0 $3,464 $2,641
OPERATING COSTS /SUPPLIES $887 $870 $7,903 $6,977
FUEL $461 $283 $2,275 $2,073
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE $3,024 $1,166 $11,351 $12,741
SUNDRY /DUES /MILEAGE /CLOTHING $278 $133 $1,040 $2,026
CAPITAL OUTLAY $0 $0 $0 $0
ONLINE REG & CREDIT CARD FEES $406 $350 $1,986 $1,993
PAR 3 EXPENDITURES TOTAL $26,336 $16,158 $132,899 $135,632
Revenue over Expenditure:
- $10,935 - $3,280 $8,375 $5,573
page 46
nLil
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
page 47
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 5
651.452.1850 phone 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota- heights.com
5g.
DATE: October 16, 2012
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, PE, Assistant City Engineer
SUBJECT: Change Order No. 1 for the Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements
BACKGROUND
Council ordered the Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements at their December 6, 2011
meeting, and directed staff to prepare plans and specifications for this street reconstruction
project. Council approved the plans and specifications at their May 15, 2012 meeting. Valley
Paving, Inc. of Shakopee, Minnesota submitted the lowest responsible bid of $1,331,170.60 and
was awarded the construction contract at the June 19, 2012, city council meeting. Their bid was
less than the Engineer's Estimate of $1,833,957.95.
Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements Project Summary
The proposed project includes reconstructing Lemay Lake Road from Mendota Heights Road to
Highway 13, Lakeview Avenue, Kendon Lane, Furlong Avenue, and Victory Avenue. Street
reconstruction includes construction of storm sewer, concrete curb and gutter, aggregate base,
bituminous surfacing, a bituminous trail along Mendota Heights Road from Highway 55 to
Lemay Lake Road, and hydrant replacement.
BUDGET IMPACT
Typically, St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPWRS) is responsible for replacing or relocating
hydrants. Due to limited schedule for this project, Valley Paving, Inc. completed tasks that were
outside of the original contractual scope of work, but were part of SPRWS' project scope. The
tasks included relocating three hydrants and replacing one gate valve. These tasks were
discussed with the city and were necessary to keep the project moving forward.
$120,000 was budgeted for water main related improvements. The contractor's request of
$15,933.00 is for the gate valve and hydrant relocations. The requested amount will be paid to
the contractor, rather than to SPRWS, and will be funded through the Water Revenue Fund
which has sufficient funds to cover these project costs.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the council approve Change Order No. 1 for the Lemay Lake Road
Neighborhood Improvements in the amount of $15,933.00. If city council wishes to implement
the staff recommendation, pass a motion approving Change Order No. 1 for the Lemay Lake
Road Neighborhood Improvements and authorize the staff to execute the change order. This
action requires a simple majority vote.
nLil
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DATE: October 16, 2012
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, PE, Assistant City Engineer
Terry Sullivan, Facility Manager
page 48
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 5
651.452.1850 phone 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota- heights.com
SUBJECT: Accepting Work and Approving Final Payment for the Roof Replacement at
the Public Works Facility
BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department moved into the current facility off Lexington Avenue in June of
1979. The original roof was covered with a ballasted EPDM Roof in 1993. The roof has
developed several leaks and reports from two roofing inspectors have identified potential major
structural issues if the roof is not replaced. One major concern is water seeping into the block
walls which can freeze causing potential wall failures. The other concern is having the weight of
the double layer of roofing which was not included in the structural design of the building.
Council authorized staff to advertise for bids at their October 18, 2011 meeting. Les Jones
Roofing, Inc. submitted the low bid and was awarded the project at the January 17, 2012, city
council meeting.
The contract work for the roof replacement at the public works facility has been inspected,
approved, and is ready for final payment (this will start the one year guarantee period).
BUDGET IMPACT
Total contract costs for this project were $148,573.00 not including indirect costs for legal,
engineering, administration, and finance. The original contract amount was $147,173.00.
The roof replacement is to be paid for through the General fund.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that council accept the project and approve the final payment of $5,641.15 to
Les Jones Roofing, Inc. of Bloomington, Minnesota.
If city council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting A
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR THE
ROOF REPLACEMENT AT PUBLIC WORKS (PROJECT #201114). This action requires
a simple majority vote.
page 49
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2012-
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND APPROVING FINAL PAYMENT FOR
THE ROOF REPLACEMENT AT PUBLIC WORKS (PROJECT #201114)
WHEREAS, pursuant to a written contract signed with the City of Mendota Heights on
January 18, 2012, with Les Jones Roofing, Inc. of Bloomington, Minnesota they have
satisfactorily completed the improvements for the Roof Replacement at the Public Works
Facility —job #201114, in accordance with such contract.
NOW THEREFORE IT IS HERBY RESOLVED; by the City Council of the City of
Mendota Heights that the work completed under said contract is hereby accepted and approved;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed to
issue a proper order for the final payment on such contract in the amount of $5,641.15, taking the
contractor's receipt in full.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this sixteenth day of October 2012.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor
ATTEST
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
2012 Licensing List for City Council
page 50
Type Contractor Name
Drywall
Gas Piping
General
HVAC
Masonry
Friedges Drywall, Inc
MCI Paint & Drywall, Inc
Benchmark Plumbing, Inc
Jim Murr Plumbing, Inc
Dakota Glass & Glazing, Inc
UMR Geothermal, Inc
Omodt & Son's Masonry, Inc
Ostertag Cement, Inc
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 Page 1 of 1
page 51
1101 Victoria Curve f Mendota Heigl'its, MN 551'
651.452,1850 phone j 651452.8940 fax
www:merdota•heigghts.com
5j
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
BACKGROUND
October 16, 2012
Mayor, City Council and City Administrator
Kristen Schabacker, Finance Director
Claims List Summary
Significant Claims
First Impressions — Annual Fire Report Printing
Greenlife Supply LLC — Fertilizer
J & B Roofing — Par 3 Clubhouse Roof
Mendota Heights Fire Relief Association — 2012 Fire Aid
City of Mendota Heights — Street Project Assessments
Nystrom Publishing Co — Newsletter Publishing
Plywood Benders — Skate Park Components
Xcel Energy — Utilities
$ 2,918.75
$ 8,037.00
$ 5,620.00
$ 63,534.09
$ 27,680.09
$ 2,816.71
$ 3,750.00
$ 8,431.65
Manual Checks Total $ 56,977.13
System Checks Total $ 166,824.02
Total for the list of claims for the October 16, 2012 city council meeting $ 223,801.15
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the list of claims for October 16, 2012.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
MANUAL CHECKS
9!30/12 MAN
Account Comments
DEPT Descr
Amount
10gle1L12 11:15 AM
page Page 1
Search Name I C M A RETIREMENT 457
G 01 -2072 09/28/12 PAYROLL
Search Name I C M A RETIREMENT 457
Search Name NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
G 01 -2072 09/28/12 PAYROLL
Search Name NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION
Search Name PLYWOOD BENDERS
E 10- 4620 - 000 -00 SKATE PARK COMPONENTS
Search Name PLYWOOD BENDERS
Search Name UNITED WAY OF ST. PAUL
G 01 -2070 09/28/12 PAYROLL
Search Name UNITED WAY OF ST. PAUL
Search Name US BANK
E 01- 4223 - 020 -20 OCT 2012 DCC PAYMENT
Search Name US BANK
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
E 15- 4211 - 400 -60
E 01- 4211 - 300 -50
E 01 -4211- 310 -50
E 01 -4211- 310 -70
E 01- 4211 - 315 -30
E 01- 4211 - 320 -70
E 01-4211 - 420 -50
E 15- 4211 - 310 -60
E 28- 4211 - 000-00
E 01- 4212 - 310 -50
E 01- 4212 - 310 -70
E 01- 4212 - 315-30
E 01- 4212 - 320 -70
E 08- 4212 - 000 -00
E 15 -4212- 310 -60
E 15- 4212- 400 -60
E 08- 4211 - 000 -00
Search Name XCEL ENERGY
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
AUG 2012 GAS UTILITIES
AUG 2012 GAS UTILITIES
AUG 2012 GAS UTILITIES
AUG 2012 GAS UTILITIES
AUG 2012 GAS UTILITIES
AUG 2012 GAS UTILITIES
AUG 2012 GAS UTILITIES
AUG 2012 EL. UTILITIES
Spec Fds
Police
$655.29
$655.29
$650.00
$650.00
$3,750.00
$3,750.00
$53.00
$53.00
$1,816.67
$1,816.67
Utility Enterprise $997.91
Road & Bridges $1,553.84
Road & Bridges $301.86
Parks & Recreation $301.86
Fire $759.33
Parks & Recreation $204.23
Road & Bridges $222.17
Utility Enterprise $301.87
Spec Fds $1,028.30
Road & Bridges $18.72
Parks & Recreation $18.72
Fire $100.12
Parks & Recreation $53.44
Spec Fds $74.70
Utility Enterprise $18.71
Utility Enterprise $28.33
Spec Fds $2,447.54
$8,431.65
$15,356.61
Account
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
MANUAL CHECKS
10/11112 MAN
Comments DEPT Descr
Amount
100/11/12 11:11 AM
page
53 Page 1
Search Name AFFINITY PLUS
G 01 -2073 10/12/2012 PAYROLL
Search Name AFFINITY PLUS
Search Name ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
E 01- 4132 - 031 -30 OCT 2012 PREMIUM
Search Name ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Search Name HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
E 01- 4305 - 030 -30
E 01 -4330- 215 -70
E 01- 4305 - 070 -70
E 01 -4305- 070 -70
E 01 -4305- 070 -70
E 01- 4305 - 070 -70
G 01 -1145
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60
E 08- 4335 - 000 -00
E 08 -4335- 000 -00
E 01- 4305 - 030 -30
OPERATING SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS
OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS
OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS
OPERATING SUPPLIES - PARKS
REPAIR SUPPLIES - LILYDALE
SEWER MAINTENANCE
BLDG MAINTENANCE - CITY HALL
BLDG MAINTENANCE - CITY HALL
OPERATING SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
Search Name HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
Search Name ICPC REG #3 RTS
E 01- 4400 - 020 -20 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
Search Name ICPC REG #3 RTS
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS GENERAL ACCT.
G 01 -1019 REPLENISH POLICE PETTY CASH
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS GENERAL ACCT.
Search Name MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
E 01- 4435 - 200 -70 FISHING DERBY PRIZE
Search Name MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Search Name NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.
G 01 -2071 OCT 2012 PREMIUM
Search Name NCPERS GROUP LIFE INS.
Search Name SW /WC SERVICE COOPERATIVES
E 05- 4131 - 105 -15
G 01 -1145
G 01-2071
E 15- 4131 - 060 -60
E 01- 4131 - 070 -70
E 01- 4131 - 050 -50
E 01- 4131 - 040 -40
E 01- 4131 - 020 -20
E 01- 4131- 110 -10
G 01 -2074
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
NOV 2012 HEALTH INSURANCE
Search Name SW/WC SERVICE COOPERATIVES
Search Name US POSTAL SERVICE
E 15 -4318- 060 -60
Fire
$1,040.00
$1,040.00
$192.10
$192.10
Fire $88.67
Parks & Recreation $148,14
Parks & Recreation $30.87
Parks & Recreation $39.07
Parks & Recreation $114.00
Parks & Recreation $65.03
$31.24
Utility Enterprise $20.74
Spec Fds $21.25
Spec Fds $21.25
Fire $43.77
$624.03
Police
Parks & Recreation
Engineering Enterprise
Utility Enterprise
Parks & Recreation
Road & Bridges
Code Enforcement/Insp
Police
Administration
$498.00
$498.00
$32.03
$32.03
$300.00
$300.00
$80.00
$80.00
$3,835.00
- $516.00
$5,315.50
$1,320.00
$1,367.00
$5,374.00
$1,320.00
$16,010.50
$3,151.50
$683.50
$37,861.00
3RD QTR UTILITY BILLING POSTAG Utility Enterprise $878.36
Search Name US POSTAL SERVICE $878.36
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
MANUAL CHECKS
10111/12 MAN
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
0/111L12 11:11 AM
page
54 Page 2
Search Name WASHINGTON COUNTY WARRANTS
G 01 -2030 WARRANT MONEY
Search Name WASHINGTON COUNTY WARRANTS
$115.00
$115.00
$41,62032
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/16/12 PAY
patge1112 11:07AM
55 Page 1
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
Search Name 4 PAWS ANIMAL CONTROL
E 01- 4225 - 800 -90 SEP 2012 ANIMAL CONTROL Animal Control $387.63
E 01- 4225 - 800 -90 AUG 2012 ANIMAL CONTROL Animal Control _ $387.63
Search Name 4 PAWS ANIMAL CONTROL $775.26
Search Name ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING
E 15- 4305 - 060 -60 BUSINESS CARDS Utility Enterprise $45.80
E 01- 4305 - 070 -70 BUSINESS CARDS Parks & Recreation $45.80
Search Name ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING $91.60
Search Name AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY
E 15-4330-490-60 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS Utility Enterprise $80.73
E 01 -4330- 490 -50 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS Road & Bridges $189.07
E 01- 4330 - 490 -50 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS Road & Bridges $47.91
Search Name AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY $317.71
Search Name APACHE GROUP
E 01- 4305 - 050 -50 SUPPLIES - PW Road & Bridges $626.94
E 01- 4305 - 070 -70 SUPPLIES - PW Parks & Recreation $316.36
E 15- 4305 - 060 -60 SUPPLIES - PW Utility Enterprise $21.59
E 01-4305-030 -30 SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT Fire $139.02
Search Name APACHE GROUP $1,103.91
Search Name BCA -C3IS
E 01 -4223- 020 -20 CIDN QUARTERLY - Q3 Police $720.00
Search Name B C A - C 3 I S $720.00
Search Name BAUER BUILT
E 01 -4330- 490 -70 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS Parks & Recreation $704.50
Search Name BAUER BUILT $704.50
Search Name BERTELSON TOTAL OFFICE SOLUTNS
E 01- 4300 - 110 -10 OFFICE SUPPLIES - ADMIN Administration $69.45
E 01- 4300 - 030 -30 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT Fire $21.89
E 01- 4300 - 030 -30 OFFICE SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT Fire $47.63
E 01 -4300- 110-10 OFFICE SUPPLIES - ADMIN Administration $85.28
Search Name BERTELSON TOTAL OFFICE SOLUTNS $224.25
Search Name BLUE TARP FINANCIAL
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS Utility Enterprise $106.84
E 01 -4305- 070 -70 OPERATING SUPPLIES Parks & Recreation $61.37
Search Name BLUE TARP FINANCIAL $168.21
Search Name BYRNES, KEVIN
E 01- 4490 - 080 -80 3RD QTR 2012 ARC MEETINGS Planning $75.00
Search Name BYRNES, KEVIN $75.00
Search Name C. DARLENE OEHLKE, CAP
E 01- 4220 - 110 -10 10/02/2012 CITY COUNCIL MTG Administration $407.00
Search Name C. DARLENE OEHLKE, CAP $407.00
Search Name CENTRAL IRRIGATION SUPPLY
E 01- 4330 - 215 -70 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS Parks & Recreation $3/4
E 01 -4330- 215 -70 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS Parks & Recreation $44.48
E 01- 4330 - 215 -70 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS Parks & Recreation $3838
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/16/12 PAY
page
10/11112 11:07 AM
Page 2
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
E 01- 4330 - 215 -70 IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS Parks & Recreation $368.20
Search Name CENTRAL IRRIGATION SUPPLY $454.80
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY RECORDER
E 01 -4220- 080-80 SEP 2012 ABSTRACT/TORRENS FEES Planning $138,00
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY RECORDER $138.00
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG
E 01 -4400- 020 -20 TRAINING - PD Police $1,400.00
Search Name DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG $1,400.00
Search Name DELL MARKETING L.P.
E 01- 4305 - 030 -30 COMPUTER - FIRE DEPT Fire $1,658.48
Search Name DELL MARKETING L.P. $1,658.48
Search Name DOUGHERTY MOLENDA
E 01- 4481 - 110 -10 SEP 2012 LEGAL SERVICES Administration $945.00
Search Name DOUGHERTY MOLENDA $945.00
Search Name DUNN, BILL
E 01 -4490- 080 -80 3RD QTR 2012 ARC MEETINGS Planning $75.00
Search Name DUNN, BILL $75.00
Search Name ELROY S ELECTRIC SERVICE
E 08 -4335- 000-00 EL. REPAIR PARTS - CITY HALL Spec Fds $58.90
E 08- 4335 - 000 -00 EL. REPAIR PARTS - CITY HALL Spec Fds $287.40
Search Name ELROY 5 ELECTRIC SERVICE $346.30
Search Name EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNC
E 01- 4268 - 030 -30 PUMP TEST - 2287 Fire $225.00
E 01- 4330 - 460 -30 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - 2287 Fire $1,380.70
E 01- 4268- 030 -30 PUMP TEST - 2282 Fire $225.00
Search Name EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNC $1,830.70
Search Name FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL & CONSTR
E 01- 4420 - 050 -50 STREET SIGN MATERIALS Road & Bridges $62.04
Search Name FASTENAL INDUSTRIAL & CONSTR $62.04
Search Name FIELD, LITTON JR
E 01 -4490- 080 -80 3RD QTR 2012 PLANNING COMM. MEETINGS Planning $75.00
Search Name FIELD, LI I ION JR $75.00
Search Name FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES
E 01- 4305- 155 -30 PROTECTIVE GEAR - FIRE DEPT Fire $144.93
Search Name FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES $144.93
Search Name FIRST IMPRESSIONS
E 01- 4268- 030 -30 2011 ANNUAL FIRE REPORT Fire $2,750.96
E 01- 4402 - 030 -30 POSTER - FIRE DEPT Fire $167.79
Search Name FIRST IMPRESSIONS $2,918.75
Search Name FLEET SERVICES
E 01- 4200 - 610 -20 AUG 2012 SQUAD LEASES Police $4,582.86
Search Name FLEET SERVICES $4,582.86
Search Name G &K SERVICES
Account
E 15- 4335 - 310 -60
E 01 -4335- 310 -50
E 01- 4335 - 310 -70
Search Narne G &K SERVICES
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/16/12 PAY
Comments
MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE
MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE
MAT SERVICE - PW GARAGE
Search Name GERTENS GREENHOUSE
E 27- 4460 - 780 -00 DELAWARE AVE RECONSTR.
Search Name GERTENS GREENHOUSE
Search Name GM MANAGEMENT
E 45- 4268 - 045 -45
E 45- 4268 - 045 -45
Search Name GM MANAGEMENT
Search Name GOLDCOM
E 01- 4305 - 030 -30
Search Name GOLDCOM
9/27 - 10/07/12 MAINT. LABOR
SEPT 2012 CONSULTING
OPERATING SUPPLIES
Search Name GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
E 01- 4210- 040 -40 SEPT 2012 SERVICE
Search Name GOPHER STATE ONE CALL
Search Name GRAINGER
E 15- 4305 - 060 -60
E 08- 4335 - 000 -00
E 08- 4335 - 000 -00
E 15 -4305- 060 -60
Search Name GRAINGER
OPERATING SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT PARTS - CITY HALL
EQUIPMENT PARTS - CITY HALL
OPERATING SUPPLIES
DEPT Descr
Utility Enterprise
Road & Bridges
Parks & Recreation
Spec Fds
Golf Course
Golf Course
Fire
Code Enforcement/Insp
Utility Enterprise
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
Utility Enterprise
Search Name GRANNIS & HAUGE, P.A.
E 01- 4222 - 120 -20 SEP 2012 LEGAL SERVICES - GENERAL PROSECU Police
E 01- 4222 - 120 -20 SEP 2012 LEGAL SERVICES - TRIALS Police
Search Name GRANNIS & HAUGE, P.A.
Search Name GREENLIFE SUPPLY LLC
E 01 -4330- 215 -70
Search Name GREENLIFE SUPPLY LLC
Search Name HENNES, DOUG
E 01 -4490- 080 -80
Search Name HENNES, DOUG
Search Name HINDERSCHIDE, PAT
E 01 -4490- 070 -70
Search Name HINDERSCHIDE, PAT
Search Name HOFFMAN, JOAN
E 01 -4481- 110 -10
Search Name HOFFMAN, JOAN
Search Name HOSE INC
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60
Search Name HOSE INC
Search Name HUEBSCH
E 08- 4335 - 000 -00
FERTILIZER - PARKS
Parks & Recreation
3RD QTR 2012 PLANNING COMM. MEETINGS Planning
3RD QTR 2012 PARK & REC. COMM. MEETINGS Parks & Recreation
STORM DAMAGE REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
MAT SERVICE - CITY HALL
Administration
Utility Enterprise
Spec Fds
p10/11 ,112 11:07 AM
Page 3
Amount
$36.17
$36.17
$36.17
$108.51
$461.70
$461.70
$1,266.88
$2,000.00
$3,266.88
$76.20
$76.20
$356.90
$356.90
$41.29
$37.00
$11933
- $41.29
$156.53
$5,237.62
$80730
$6,04512
$8,037.00
$8,037.00
$75.00
$75.00
$50.00
$50.00
$1,53730
$1,537.50
$80.50
$8030
$184.50
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/16/12 PAY
page 11:07 AM
Page 4
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
Search Name HUEBSCH $184.50
Search Name INTERNATIONAL OFFICE TECHNLGY
E 01- 4300- 110 -10 TONER - FINANCE Administration $111.73
Search Name INTERNATIONAL OFFICE TECHNLGY $111.73
Search Name INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM
E 01- 4330- 440 -20 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE - PD Police $113.23
Search Name INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM $11323
Search Name INTOXIMETERS
E 01- 4330 - 440 -20 EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD Police $97.98
Search Name INTOXIMETERS $97.98
Search Name INVER GROVE FORD
E 01- 4330 - 440 -20
E 01- 4330 - 440 -20
Search Name INVER GROVE FORD
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD
EQUIPMENT REPAIR - PD
Police
Police
$109.99
$109.99
$219.98
Search Name IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMT
E 01- 4490 - 110 -10 SEPT 2012 SHREDDING Administration $10.71
E 01- 4490 - 020 -20 SEPT 2012 SHREDDING Police $32,17
Search Name IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMT $42.88
Search Name 3 & B ROOFING
E 01 -4481- 110 -10
Search Name 3 & B ROOFING
PAR 3 ROOF REPAIRS
Administration
$5,620.00
$5,620.00
Search Name JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INC.
E 01- 4335 - 315 -30 OCT 2012 SERVICE - FIRE DEPT Fire $213.75
E 01 -4335- 310 -50 OCT 2012 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Road & Bridges $71.25
E 01- 4335 - 310 -70 OCT 2012 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Parks & Recreation $71.25
E 15- 4335 - 310 -60 OCT 2012 SERVICE - PW GARAGE Utility Enterprise $71.25
Search Name JANI -KING OF MINNESOTA, INC. $427.50
Search Name KIPP, IRA
E 01- 4490- 070 -70 3RD QTR 2012 PARK & REC. COMM. MEETINGS Parks & Recreation $50.00
Search Name KIPP, IRA $50.00
Search Name KLM ENGINEERING, INC
G 01 -2125 T- MOBILE PROJECT RETAINER $1,200.00
Search Name KLM ENGINEERING, INC $1,200.00
Search Name LAIRD, JAMES
E 01- 4415- 030 -30 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - FIRE SCHOOL Fire $77.70
Search Name LAIRD, JAMES $77.70
Search Name LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60
E 01- 4330 - 490 -70
E 15- 4330- 490 -60
E 01 -4330- 490 -50
E 01- 4330 - 490 -70
E 01-4330-490 -50
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
Utility Enterprise
Parks & Recreation
Utility Enterprise
Road & Bridges
Parks & Recreation
Road & Bridges
Utility Enterprise
$154.15
$76.23
- $18.83
$37.50
$37.50
$76.24
$299.68
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/1 611 2 PAY
Account Comments
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SUPPLIES
Search Name LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC
Search Name LEAGUE MN CITIES
E 01 -4400- 020 -20 CLASSES - PD
Search Name LEAGUE MN CITIES
Search Name LEVINE, STEPHANIE
E 01- 4490 - 070 -70
Search Name LEVINE, STEPHANIE
Search Name LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS
E 27- 4240 - 782 -00
E 27- 4240 - 785 -00
E 27-4240- 783 -00
E 01- 4240-080-80
E 27 -4240- 784 -00
DEPT Descr
Utility Enterprise
Police
3RD QTR 2012 PARK & REC. COMM. MEETINGS Parks & Recreation
NOTICE -
NOTICE -
NOTICE -
9/9/2012
NOTICE -
E 27- 4240- 787 -00 NOTICE -
E 27- 4240 - 774 -00 NOTICE -
Search Name LILLIE SUBURBAN NEWS
Search Name LORBERBAUM, SALLY
E 01 -4490- 080 -80
Search Name LORBERBAUM, SALLY
Search Name LYNN & ASSOCIATES
LEMAY LAKE PROJECT
MN ROAD PROJECT
DIANE RD PROJECT
PLANNING NOTICE
MARIE AVE PROJECT
CROWN POINT PROJECT
HUNTER /ORCHARD PROJECT
3RD QTR 2012 ARC MEETINGS
E 01 -4400- 110 -10 CONFERENCE - J. MILLER
Search Name LYNN & ASSOCIATES
Search Name M T I DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
E 45- 4330 - 490 -45 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
Search Name M T I DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
Search Name MAGNUSON, MARY
E 01- 4490 - 080 -80 3RD QTR 2012 PLANNING. COMM. MEETINGS Planning
Search Name MAGNUSON, MARY
Search Name MCGRORY- USSET, MARY
E 01- 4490 - 070 -70 3RD QTR 2012 PARK & REC. COMM. MEETINGS Parks & Recreation
Search Name MCGRORY - USSET, MARY
Search Name MENARDS
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
Planning
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
Planning
Administration
Golf Course
E 01- 4305 - 030 -30
E 45 -4335- 046 -45
E 45 -4335- 046 -45
E 01 -4330- 215 -70
E 15 -4305- 060 -60
Search Name MENARDS
OPERATING SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
BLDG MAINTENANCE - PAR 3
BLDG MAINTENANCE - PAR 3
PARK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
OPERATING SUPPLIES - SEWER
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE RELIEF
E 06- 4490- 000 -00 2012 STATE AID
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE RELIEF
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS, CITY OF
E 19- 4460-000 -00 ASSESSMENT
Fire
Golf Course
Golf Course
Parks & Recreation
Utility Enterprise
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
p10151211:07AM
ge Page 5
Amount
$76.23
$738.70
$15.00
$15.00
$50.00
$50.00
$109.38
$106.25
$106.25
$106.27
$106.25
$153.13
$165.38
$852.91
$50.00
$50.00
$980.00
$980.00
$272.27
$272.27
$75.00
$75.00
$50.00
$50.00
$69.45
$35.38
$145.49
$29.55
$12.80
$292.67
$63,534.09
$63,534.09
$3,197.11
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/16/12 PAY
110y/11112 11:07 AM
p
6U0 Page 6
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
E 19 -4460- 000 -00 ASSESSMENT Spec Fds $7,272.97
E 19- 4460 - 000 -00 ASSESSMENT Spec Fds $10,812.90
E 19- 4460 - 000 -00 ASSESSMENT Spec Fds $3,200.00
E 19- 4460 - 000 -00 ASSESSMENT Spec Fds $3,197.11
Search Name MENDOTA HEIGHTS, CITY OF $27,680.09
Search Name METRO FIRE
E 01- 4330 - 460 -30 SCBA FLOW TEST Fire $65.00
Search Name METRO FIRE $65.00
Search Name METRO SALES
E 01-4330-030-30 QUARTERLY COPIER MAINTENANCE - FIRE HALL Fire $71.13
Search Name METRO SALES $71.13
Search Name MILLER, DAVID
E 01 -4490- 070 -70 3RD QTR 2012 PARK & REC. COMM. MEETINGS Parks & Recreation $50.00
Search Name MILLER, DAVID $50.00
Search Name MILLER, JUSTIN
E 01- 4400- 110 -10
Search Name MILLER, JUSTIN
Search Name MITCHELLI
E 01 -4300- 040 -40
TRAVEL P. REIMBURSEMENT
Administration $523.88
$523.88
OCT 2012 SERVICE Code Enforcement/Insp $155.03
Search Name MITCHELL' $155.03
Search Name MN DEPT OF TRSPT
E 27 -4460- 784 -00 PLANT INSPECTIONS - MARIE AVE Spec Fds $247.50
Search Name MN DEPT OF TRSPT $247.50
Search Name MN ST ADMIN ITG TELECOM SRVCE
E 01- 4210 - 030 -30 AUG 2012 SERVICE Fire $85.29
E 01- 4210 - 030 -30 JULY 2012 SERVICE Fire $85.20
Search Name MN ST ADMIN ITG TELECOM SRVCE $170.49
Search Name MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320
G 01 -2075 OCT 2012 UNION DUES
$606.00
Search Name MN TEAMSTERS LOCAL 320 $606.00
Search Name MULCAHY, LIZ AND GLENN
E 01- 4481 - 110 -10 STORM DAMAGE REPAIR Administration
Search Name MULCAHY, LIZ AND GLENN
Search Name MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES
E 01- 4305-155 -30 PROTECTIVE GEAR - FIRE DEPT Fire
Search Name MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES
Search Name NEUHARTH, JIM
E 01- 4490 - 080 -80 3RD QTR 2012 ARC MEETINGS Planning
Search Name NEUHARTH, JIM
Search Name NI 111 SANITATION INC
E 45- 4280 - 045 -45 EXTRA SERVICE /RECYCLING Golf Course
Search Name NITTI SANITATION INC
Search Name NOACK, GEORGE
$1,037.50
$1,037.50
$245.93
$245.93
$75.00
$75.00
$57.86
$57.86
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10116/12 PAY
Account Comments
E 01 -4415- 050 -50 MILEAGE REIMB. - SEMINAR
Search Name NOACK, GEORGE
Search Name NOONAN, MICHAEL
E 01 -4490- 080 -80
Search Narne NOONAN, MICHAEL
Search Name NORLING, GINA
E 01- 4490 - 080 -80
Search Name NORLING, GINA
DEPT Descr
Road & Bridges
3RD QTR 2012 PLANNING COMM. MEETINGS Planning
3RD QTR 2012 ARC MEETINGS
Search Name NORTHSTAR MUDJACKING SPECIAL
E 29- 4330 - 000-00 MUDJACKING SERVICES
Search Name NORTHSTAR MUDJACKING SPECIAL
Search Name NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTAN
E 01- 4221- 135 -80 SEP 2012 RETAINER
Search Name NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTAN
Search Name NORTON, STEPHEN
E 01 -4490- 080 -80
Search Name NORTON, STEPHEN
Planning
Spec Fds
Planning
3RD QTR 2012 PLANNING COMM. MEETINGS Planning
Search Name NYSTROM PUBLISHING CO., INC.
E 01- 4268 - 650 -70
E 15 -4268- 650 -60
E 45- 4268 - 650 -00
E 01- 4268 - 650-85
E 21 -4268- 650 -00
E 01- 4268- 650 -10
Search Name NYSTROM
FALL 2012 NEWSLE I i ER
FALL 2012 NEWSLE 1 1 ER
FALL 2012 NEWSLETTER
FALL 2012 NEWSLETTER
FALL 2012 NEWSLETTER
FALL 2012 NEWSLh 1 1 ER
PUBLISHING CO., INC.
Search Name OFFICE DEPOT
E 01- 4300 - 020 -20
E 01 -4330- 030 -30
E 01 -4300- 020 -20
E 01 -4300- 030 -30
E 01-4300-030-30
Search Name OFFICE DEPOT
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Search Name OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICES
E 01- 4490 - 110 -10 OCT 2012 COBRA ADMIN. FEE
Search Name OPTUMHEALTH FINANCIAL SERVICES
Search Name OREILLY AUTO /FIRST CALL
E 01 -4305- 030 -30
E 01 -4330- 490 -50
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60
OPERATING SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT
EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
OPERATING SUPPLIES
E 01- 4330 - 440 -20 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
Search Name OREILLY AUTO/FIRST CALL
Search Name OSLAND JANITORIAL SUPPLY
Parks & Recreation
Utility Enterprise
Spec Fds
Recycling
Spec Fds
Administration
Police
Fire
Police
Fire
Fire
Administration
Fire
Road & Bridges
Utility Enterprise
Police
pa0e 612 11:07 AM
Page 7
Amount
$105.45
$105.45
$75.00
$75.00
$50.00
$50.00 _
$300.00
$300.00
$2,400.00
$2,400.00
$75.00
$75.00
$739.08
$164.24
$98.54
$114.97
$271.00
$1,428.88
$2,816.71
-$5.79
$124.22
$56.23
$64.38
$21.09
$260.13
$45.00
$45.00
$67.11
$112.74
$58.59
- $61.99
$176.45
E 08 -4335 -000 -00 SUPPLIES - CITY HALL Spec Fds $235.13
Search Name OSLAND JANITORIAL SUPPLY $235.13
Account
Search Name OVERLINE & SON, INC.
E 15-4330- 490 -60
Search Name OVERLINE & SON, INC.
Search Name OXYGEN SERVICE CO
E 01-4330-490-50
E 01 -4330- 490 -70
E 01- 4200 - 610 -70
E 01- 4200 - 610 -50
E 01- 4305 - 030 -30
E 15 -4200- 610 -60
E 15- 4330 - 490 -60
Search Name OXYGEN SERVICE CO
Search Name PENTEL, REBECCA
E 01- 4130 - 021 -20
E 01 -4130- 021 -20
Search Name PENTEL, REBECCA
Search Name PORTZ, PAUL
E 01- 4490 - 080 -80
Search Name PORTZ, PAUL
Search Name QUINLAN, ANDY
E 01- 4415 - 050 -50
Search Name QUINLAN, ANDY
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/16/12 PAY
Comments DEPT Descr
page 11:07 AM
Page 8
Amount
SEWER MAINTENANCE
CYLINDER MAINTENANCE
CYLINDER MAINTENANCE
QUARTERLY CYLINDER RENT
QUARTERLY CYLINDER RENT
QUARTERLY CYLINDER RENT
QUARTERLY CYLINDER RENT
CYLINDER MAINTENANCE
TEMP HELP - CITIZENS' ACADEMY
TEMP HELP - PD
3RD QTR 2012 ARC MEETINGS
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - SEMINAR
Search Name RATWIK,ROSZAK & MALONEY, P.A.
E 01 -4481- 110 -10 AUG 2012 LEGAL SERVICES
Search Name RATWIK,ROSZAK & MALONEY, P.A.
Search Name ROAD EQUIPMENT PARTS CENTER
E 01- 4330 - 490 -50 EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS
Search Name ROAD EQUIPMENT PARTS CENTER
Search Name ROOTX
G 15 -2035
E 15 -4330- 490 -60
Search Name ROOD(
Search Name ROSTON, HOWARD
E 01 -4490- 080 -80
Search Name ROSTON, HOWARD
SEWER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
SEWER MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES
3RD QTR 2012 PLANNING COMM. MEETINGS
Search Name SEVEN CORNERS ACE HDWE
E 08- 4335 - 000 -00 REPAIR PARTS - CITY HALL
Search Name SEVEN CORNERS ACE HDWE
Search Name SHERWIN WILLIAMS
E 01- 4424 - 050 -50
Search Name SHERWIN WILLIAMS
Search Name SLOAN, DAVE
E 01- 4490 - 080 -80
Search Name SLOAN, DAVE
PAINT - CROSSWALKS
3RD QTR 2012 ARC MEETINGS
Utility Enterprise
Road & Bridges
Parks & Recreation
Parks & Recreation
Road & Bridges
Fire
Utility Enterprise
Utility Enterprise
Police
Police
Planning
Road & Bridges
Administration
Road & Bridges
Utility Enterprise
Planning
Spec Fds
Road & Bridges
Planning
$997.50
$997.50
$30.28
$30.28
$25.65
$25.65
$129.79
$25,65
$30.28
$297.58
$300.00
$290.00
$590.00
$75.00
$75.00
$99.90
$99.90
$1,716.50
$1,716.50
$175.31
$175.31
- $116.02
$1,803.64
$1,687.62
$50.00
$50.00
$6.18
$6.18
$338.37
$338.37
$75.00
$75.00
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10116112 PAY
P 1100/111/12 11:07 AM
Page 9
Account Comments DEPT Descr Amount
Search Name SOLBERG AGGREGATE
E 01 -4422- 050 -50 STREET MAINTENANCE MATERIALS Road & Bridges $447.68
Search Name SOLBERG AGGREGATE $447.68
Search Name SPRWS
E 45- 4425 - 045 -45 Q2 2012 WATER SERVICE Golf Course $46.16
Search Name SPRWS $46.16
Search Name STREICHERS
E 01 -4410- 020 -20 EQUIPMENT - PD Police $75.85
Search Name STRETCHERS $75.85
Search Name SUNSHINE PHOTOGRAPHY, INC.
E 01- 4305 - 030 -30 PHOTOGRAPHY - FIRE DEPT Fire $53.44
G 01 -2035 USE TAX -$3.44
Search Name SUNSHINE PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. $50.00
Search Name TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC. SVC.
E 01- 4220 - 080 -80 09/24/12 PLANNING COMM. MTG
Search Name TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC. SVC.
Search Name TOTH, MIKE
E 01- 4490-070 -70
Search Name TOTH, MIKE
Planning
3RD QTR 2012 PARK & REC. COMM. MEETINGS Parks & Recreation
Search Name TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HLTH
E 08- 4490 - 000 -00
E 07- 4400 - 000 -00
MEDICAL SERVICE
VACCINES - PD
E 07 -4400- 000-00 EXAMS - PD
Search Name TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HLTH
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
Spec Fds
$168.75
$168.75
$50.00
$50.00
$172.82
$195.00
$120.00
$487.82
Search Name TWIN CITY TELEPHONE
E 01- 4330 - 490 -10 TELEPHONE SERVICE Administration $137.59
Search Name TWIN CITY TELEPHONE $137.59
Search Name U P S
E 01- 4318 - 020 -20 SHIPPING CHARGES - PD Police $3.01
Search Name U P S $3.01
Search Name UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
E 01- 4410 - 020 -20 UNIFORMS - PD Police $504.97
Search Name UNIFORMS UNLIMITED $504.97
Search Name UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
E 05- 4400 - 105 -15 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION Engineering Enterprise $235.00
Search Name UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA $235.00
Search Name URMANN, DENISE
E 01- 4410-020 -20 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT - D. URMANN Police $1,880.00
Search Name URMANN, DENISE $1,880.00
Search Name VALSPAR PAINT
E 01 -4330- 215 -70 PAINT - HOCKEY RINK Parks & Recreation $684.00
Search Name VALSPAR PAINT $684.00
Account
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Claims List
SYSTEM CHECKS
10/18/12 PAY
Comments
Search Name VERIZON WIRELESS
E 01- 4210 - 030 -30
Search Name VERIZON WIRELESS
Search Name VIKSNINS, ANSIS
E 01- 4490 - 080 -80
Search Name VIKSNINS, ANSIS
Search Name WASTE MANAGEMENT
E 01- 4280 - 310 -70
E 15 -4280- 310 -60
E 01- 4280 - 310 -50
E 08 -4280- 000 -00
Search Name WASTE MANAGEMENT
SEP -OCT 2012 CELL SERVICE
3RD QTR 2012 PLANNING COMM. MEE I INGS
SEP 2012 SERVICE - PW GARAGE
SEP 2012 SERVICE - PW GARAGE
SEP 2012 SERVICE - PW GARAGE
SEP 2012 SERVICE - CITY HALL
Search Name WINTHROP & WEINSTINE
E 01 -4221- 120 -10
E 27- 4220-782 -00
E 01- 4481 - 110 -10
E 01- 4220 - 120 -10
E 01 -4220- 120 -80
E 37- 4220-120 -00
G 27 -1145
Search Name WINTHROP
AUG 2012
AUG 2012
AUG 2012
AUG 2012
AUG 2012
AUG 2012
AUG 2012
& WEINSTINE
Search Name WRIGHT & MCGILL CO.
LEGAL SERVICES - RETAINER
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
LEGAL SERVICES
G 01 -1215 2013 FISHING DERBY SUPPLIES
Search Name WRIGHT & MCGILL CO.
DEPT Descr
Fire
Planning
10/11/12 11:07 AM
page 64 Page 10
Amount
Parks & Recreation
Utility Enterprise
Road & Bridges
Spec Fds
Administration
Spec Fds
Administration
Administration
Planning
Spec Fds
$132.35
$132.35
$75.00
$75.00
$189.79
$189.79
$189.80
$145.44
$714.82
$500.00
$79.50
$1,075.50
$937.75
$119.25
$119.25
$119.25
$2,950.50
$20.00
$20.00
$166,824.02
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DATE: October 16, 2012
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: Ryan Ruzek, PE, Assistant City Engineer
Michael Albers, PE, Civil Engineer
.ase 65
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 551
651.452.1850 phone 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota- heights.com
SUBJECT: Assessment Hearing for Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements
BACKGROUND
Staff identified the Lemay Lake Road Rehabilitation as a 2012 street reconstruction project in the 2011-
2015 Street Improvement Plan (SIP).
Council ordered the Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements at their December 6, 2011 meeting,
and directed staff to prepare plans and specifications for this street reconstruction project. Council
approved the plans and specifications at their May 15, 2012 meeting.
The Public Hearing for the consideration of special assessments for the Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood
Improvements was advertised for the city council meeting at 7:00 P.M. The project has been substantially
completed with only the final wear course, street striping, signage replacement, and miscellaneous punch
list items remaining.
Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements Project Summary
The proposed project includes reconstructing Lemay Lake Road from Mendota Heights Road to
Highway 13, Lakeview Avenue, Kendon Lane, Furlong Avenue, and Victory Avenue. Street
reconstruction includes construction of storm sewer, pond grading, concrete curb and gutter,
aggregate base, bituminous surfacing, a bituminous trail along Mendota Heights Road from
highway 55 to Lemay Lake Road, and hydrant replacement.
BUDGET IMPACT
The total construction cost for the Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements is $1,331,170.60,
not including easement acquisition, hydrant replacement, signage replacement and indirect costs
for legal, engineering, administration, and finance. Because the contract price was substantially
lower than our estimate, the amount to be assessed is now $341,931.26, which results in a lower
assessment than originally proposed.
A feasibility report for the project was presented to the city council in August of 2011pa4 spy
of the final assessment roll is attached to this memo. Assessments are shown in the tables below.
Front Footage Assessment: Lemav Lake Road (Non - Residential Dronerties
ASSESSABLE PROPERTY
FRONT
FOOTAGE
FRONTAGE
ASSESSMENT
($/L.F.) PER
FEASIBILITY
REPORT
ACTUAL
FRONTAGE
ASSESSMENT
($/L.F.)
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
AMOUNT
1201 Mendota Heights Road
(Thaw LLP)
461
$72.77
$54.11
$24,944.71
Parcel 270410042010
(City of Mendota Heights)
801
$72.77
$54.11
$43,342.11
Parcel 270410041010
(Resurrection Cemetery)
168
$72.77
$54.11
$9,090.48
Parcel 270410037010
(Resurrection Cemetery)
214
$72.77
$54.11
$11,579.54
Totals
$88,956.84
Unit Assessment: Lakeview Avenue, Kendon Avenue, Furlong Avenue, Victory Avenue,
and Lemav Lake Road (Residential nronerties
ASSESSMENT TYPE
ASSESSABLE
UNITS
UNIT
ASSESSMENT
PER FEASIBILITY
REPORT
ACTUAL UNIT
ASSESSMENT
TOTAL
ASSESSMENT
AMOUNT
STREET RECONSTRUCTION:
Lakeview Avenue, Kendon
Avenue, Furlong Avenue,
Victory Avenue
31
$8,500.00
$6,953.35
$215,553.85
STREET RECONSTRUCTION:
Lemay Lake Road
7
$8,500.00
$6,953.35
$48,673.45
Totals
$264,227.30
The property owners at 1300 Furlong Avenue, 1286 Kendon Lane, and 1309 Kendon Lane
replaced the entire driveway or a portion of their driveway at their cost and staff is proposing to
adjust their assessments to account for the portion of their driveways the City would have
replaced. The city purchased drainage and utility easements from 1300 Furlong Avenue, 1295
Kendon Lane, and 1280 Lakeview Avenue. 1280 Lakeview Avenue would like to receive a
check for the drainage and utility easement in the amount of $3,105 plus legal fees. The property
owners of 1300 Furlong Avenue and 1295 Kendon Lane would like their assessments adjusted
for the amount of the drainage and utility easements. See assessment adjustments below.
SUBTOTAL OF ASSESSMENTS $353,184.14
Adjustment to 1300 Furlong Avenue (Driveway) - $543.50
Adjustment to 1286 Kendon Lane (Driveway) - $3,000.00
Adjustment to 1309 Kendon Lane (Driveway) - $607.17
Adjustment to 1300 Furlong Avenue (Easement) - $778.56
Adjustment to 1295 Kendon Lane (Easement) - $6323.65
GRAND TOTAL $341,931.26
page 67
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that council conduct the required Public Hearing and adopt the attached
assessment roll as prepared, or amend them if council deems it appropriate to do so.
Conduct the required Public Hearing and then if city council wishes to implement the
recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND
CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE LEMAY LAKE ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD
IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT #201105). This action requires a simple majority vote.
page 68
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2012-
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE LEMAY
LAKE ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT #201105)
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Mendota Heights
City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the
improvement to Lemay Lake Road from Mendota Heights Road to Highway 13, Lakeview Avenue,
Kendon Lane, Furlong Avenue, and Victory Avenue referred to as the Lemay Lake Road
Neighborhood Improvements.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that:
1. Such proposed assessments, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, is
hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein,
and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed
improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a
period of 19 years. The first of the installments shall be the annual principal plus interest
calculated from the public hearing date to the end of this year plus twelve months of the next
year and shall bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the adoption of the
assessment resolution. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for
one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the
assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with
interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Finance Director, except that no interest
shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
resolution. The property owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Finance Director
the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, excepting the installment portion
appearing upon the current year's property tax statement.
4. The City Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said
assessment rolls with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be
extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter
collect said assessments in the manner provided by law.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this sixteenth day of October, 2012.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor
ATTEST
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
Street Reconstruction = 19 Years
I1"TEREST RATE = 6%
Parcel No: Reputed (honer:
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS - ASSESSMENT ROLL
Lemay Lake Road Neighborhood Improvements
Job #201105
Subdivision:
Lot: Block: Recon:
page 69
Total:
27- 03400-
Thaw LLP
Section 34 Twn 28 Range 23 pt of NW 1/4
010
77
$24,944.71
24,944.71
77 -010
3604 Fuller Street
of SE 1/4 com 776 ft N of SE cor SW on S
line Rogers St 653 ft SE on R/W Hgwy
Edina, MN 55410 -2362
381.5 ft to N line Men Hghts RD E on Men
Hghts Rd 313.22 ft to E line NW 1/4 of SE
1/4 N 425.1 ft to beg ex pt hgwy
27- 04100-
Cory A. Lane &
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 N 81.5 ft of Lot
011
36
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
36 -011
Regina Lane
36
2314 LeMay Lake Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1145
27- 04100-
Jacqueline R. McLeod
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 S 442 ft of L -36
013
36
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
36 -013
2376 LeMay Lake Road
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1145
27- 04100-
Mark E. & Colleen Kahn
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 S 152 ft of N
016
36
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
36 -016
2370 LeMay Lake Road
578.9 ft of L -36
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27- 04100-
36 -017
James Mulvaney
2366 LeMay Lake Road
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 N 120 ft of S
272 ft of N 578.9 ft of L -36
017
36
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27- 04100-
36 -018
Christopher & Julie Woolsey
2316 LeMay Lake Road
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 W 1 acre of E
2 acres of S 225.4 ft of N 306.9 ft of L -36
018
36
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1145
27- 04100-
Cath Cem
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 subj to hgwy
010
37
$11,579.54
11,579.54
37 -010
244 Dayton Ave.
esmnt
Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1802
Monday, October 01, 2012
Lemap Lake Road
Final
Page 1 of 6
Parcel No: Reputed Owner:
page 70
Subdivision: Lot: Block: Recoil: Total:
27- 04100-
41 -010
Catholic Cemetery
244 Dayton Ave.
Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1802
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 Lots 2 21 24
30 33 34 38 40 41 & Lots 8 11 & 20 ex pt
of lots 2 8 11 & 20 shown as parcel 212 on
MN Dot r/w plat 19 -1 & 19 -2 & ex pt on Lot
20 S'ly SE'ly & Ely of Mn Dot r/w plat 19-
98 & 19 -99 being pt of Resurrection
Cemetery
010
41
$9,090.48
$9,090.48
27- 04100-
City of Mendota Heights
Auditors Subdivision No. 34 subj to hgwy
010
42
$43,342.11
43,342.11
42 -010
1101 Victoria Curve
esment
Mendota Heights, MN 55118-4167
27- 28400-
Melvin & Margaret Koppen
Furlong Addition W 118 ft of Lot 1 Blk 2
011
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -011
1316 Victory Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 5510 -1223
27- 28400-
Cu Vu Nguyen &
Furlong Addition pt of Lot 1 Blk 2 lying E of
012
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -012
Michelle Thi Nguyen
W 118 ft thereof
2628 E 22nd Street
Minneapolis, MN 55406 -1253
27- 28400-
Sihu Chang &
Furlong Addition L -2 B -2
020
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -020
Suipien Chao
10613 Alison Way
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
27- 28400-
Timothy J. Furlong
Furlong Addition L -6 B -2
060
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -060
2230 Highway 13
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1166
27- 28400-
Jane T. Furlong Lynch
Furlong Addition L -7 B -2
070
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -070
1313 Furlong Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1202
27- 28400-
Dennis J. & Rita M. Corrigan
Furlong Addition all of Lot 8 Blk 2 & W 40
091
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -091
1309 Furlong Avenue
ft of Lot 9 Blk 2
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1202
Monday, October 01, 2012
Lemay Lake Road
Final
Page 2 of 6
Parcel No: Reputed Owner:
Subdivision:
Lot: Block: Recoil:
page 71
Total:
27- 28400-
John G. & Beth W. Asmussen
Furlong Addition Ex W 20 ft of L -11 Blk 2
111
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -111
1305 Furlong Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1202
27- 28400-
Alton T. & Agnes A. Berskow
Furlong Addition Lot 9 ex W 40 ft all of Lot
112
02
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
02 -112
1307 Furlong Avenue
1 0 & W 20 ft of Lot 1 1 all in Blk 2
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1202
27- 28400-
Timothy J. Stearns &
Furlong Addition L -1 Blk 3
010
03
$5,631.29
$5,631.29
03 -010
Kristin L. Philstrom Stearns
1300 Furlong Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27- 28400-
Emmajean Anderson &
Furlong Addition L -3 Blk 3
032
03
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
03 -032
Robert H. Anderson
1312 Furlong Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55120
27- 28400-
Carol A. Doffing
Furlong Addition all of lots 5 thru 7 Blk 3
070
03
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
03 -070
1314 Furlong Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1202
27- 28400-
Douglas R. & Kathleen Geier
Furlong Addition all of lots 8 Blk 2 and Lot
090
03
$6,346.18
$6,346.18
03 -090
1309 Kendon Lane
9 Blk 3
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1203
27- 28400-
John & Kristen M. Arehart
Furlong Addition all of lots 10 Blk 3 & Lot
110
03
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
03 -110
1305 Kendon Lane
11 Blk 3
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1203
27- 28400-
David & Carmel Hiner
Furlong Addition L -12 Blk 3
120
03
$629.70
$629.70
03 -120
1295 Kendon Lane
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1226
Monday, October 01, 2012
Lemay Lake Road
Final
Page 3of6
Parcel No: Reputed Owner:
Subdivision:
Lot: Block: Recoil:
page 72
Total:
27- 28400-
John Legler &
Furlong Addition L -1 B -4
010
04
$3,953.35
$3,953.35
04 -010
Maren Aspass
1286 Kendon Lane
Mendota Hegihts, MN 55120
27- 28400-
04 -030
Thomas R. & Margaret Swanson
1294 Kendon Lane
Furlong Addition all of Lots 2 Blk 4 and Lot
3 Blk 4
030
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1226
27- 28400-
04 -050
Gordie A. & Judy A. Dahlberg
1298 Kendon Lane
Furlong Addition all of L -4 Blk 4 and E 30 ft
of L -5 B -4
050
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1226
27- 28400-
Richard & Harriet Sperle
Furlong Addition W 30 ft of L -5 Blk 4 and
060
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -060
1302 Kendon Lane
all of Lot 6 Blk 4
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1227
27- 28400-
Samir & Nadia Keric
Furlong Addition all of L -7 Blk 4 & E 30 ft
080
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -080
1306 Kendon Lane
of L -8 Blk 4
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1227
27- 28400-
Laurens C. Sr. Matton &
Furlong Addition W 30 ft of Lot 8 Blk 4 &
090
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -090
Isabel B. Matton
all of Lot 9 Blk 4
1310 Kendon Lane
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1227
27- 28400-
Loring & Darlene J. Lysne
Furlong Addition Lot 10 subj to hgwy
110
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -110
1307 Lakeview Avenue
esmnt & all of L -11 Blk 4
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1207
27- 28400-
Richard & Sara Griep
Furlong Addition all of L -12 Blk 4 and W 40
130
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -130
1303 Lakeview Avenue
ft of L -13 Blk 4
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1207
Monday, October 01, 2012
Lemay Lake Road
Final
Page 4 of 6
Parcel No: Reputed Owner:
Subdivision:
Lot: Block: Recoil:
page 73
Total:
27- 28400-
Mitchell J. Lallier
Furlong Addition L -14 Blk 4
140
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -140
1299 Lakeview Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1206
27- 28400-
Roslyn T. Drew
Furlong Addition E 45 ft of Lot 15 Blk 4 &
161
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -161
1295 Lakeview Avenue
all of Lot 16 Blk 4
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1206
27- 28400-
Daniel M. Bredvold
Furlong Addition ex the W 150 ft of L -17
170
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -170
1281 Lakeview Avenue
Blk 4
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1206
27- 28400-
Michael Wandschneider
Furlong Addition W 150 ft of L -17 Blk 4
171
04
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
04 -171
8775 Barnes Ave.
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
27- 28400-
Scott M. Norling &
Furlong Addition L -1 Blk 5
010
05
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
05 -010
Gina A. Norling
1280 Lakeview Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
27- 28400-
John L. Heyn
Furlong Addition L -2 Blk 5
020
05
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
05 -020
1284 Lakeview Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1206
27- 28400-
Mervin G. Tste Compton &
Furlong Addition all of lots 3 & 4 Blk 5
040
05
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
05 -040
Ida M. Tste Compton
1288 Lakeview Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55120 -1206
27- 28400-
James & Kari Enright
Furlong Addition L -5 B -5
050
05
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
05 -050
1296 Lakeview Avenue
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Monday, October 01, 2012
Lemay Lake Road
Final
Page 5 of 6
Parcel No: Reputed (honer:
Subdivision:
Lot: Block: Recon:
page 74
Total:
27- 28400-
05 -070
Cheryl Dahl & Michael Derks
3680 Cuneen Trail E.
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55076 -3374
Furlong Addition all of Lots 6 Blk 5 and Lot
7 Blk 5
070
05
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
27- 66500-
Gerard & Doris Bohlig
Schouveller Subdivision pt of Lot 6 com N
063
00
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
00 -063
2454 Lemay Lake Road
line 125 ft SW of NE cor S 105 ft W 100 ft
N 105 ft E 100 ft to beg
Mendota Heights, MN 55120 -1165
27- 66500-
City of Mendota Heights
Schouveller Subdivision pt of Lot 6 com SE
067
00
$6,953.35
$6,953.35
00 -067
1101 Victoria Curve
line 75 ft SW of SE cor cont SE line SW
82.75 ft to NE boundary STH #55 NW on
Saint Paul, MN 55118 -4167
Hgwy 112.6 ft N 70D E 128 ft SE 99.8 ft to
Number of Properties: 42
Total Rehabilitation:
$341,931.26
llonday, October 01, 2012 Lemay Lake Road Final Page 6 of 6
CITY OF
MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DATE: October 16, 2012
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator
FROM: John R. Mazzitello, PE, PMP
Public Works Director /City Engineer
page 75
1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 551
651.452.1850 phone 651.452.8940 fax
www.mendota-heights.com
SUBJECT: Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements
8a.
BACKGROUND
Staff identified the Hunter Lane Neighborhood Improvements as a 2013 street reconstruction
project in the 2012 -2016 Street Improvement Plan (SIP). The Glenhill Road Neighborhood
Rehabilitation was identified as a 2013 street rehabilitation project in the 2012 -2016 SIP. Due to
the close proximity of these projects to each other, staff proposes to combine these two
neighborhood improvements into one project to reduce redundancies, increase the efficiency of
the bidding process, and minimize administrative staff time. The combined project will be called
the Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements. This project includes reconstructing the
rural sections of Culligan Lane (further referred to as Culligan Lane (East)), Hunter Lane and
Orchard Place. This project also includes rehabilitating the urban sections of Culligan Lane
(further referred to as Culligan Lane (West)), Glenhill Road, Orchard Circle, and Veronica Lane.
A feasibility report was prepared for the project and was accepted by Council on August 21st. A
Public Hearing was held on October 2nd. Prior to the Public Hearing, staff conducted a mail
survey to all the property owners adjacent to the reconstruction portion of the project. In
addition, staff held an informal neighborhood meeting where project issues were discussed.
At the Public Hearing, staff presented a project that was intended to address the concerns of the
residents. Residents were allowed to speak and ask questions, and Council and staff responded
to those questions. Council then closed the public hearing, discussed the ordering of the project,
and provided staff with their individual opinions. Council agreed unanimously to remove the
proposed curb bump -outs, eliminate the narrowing of the roadway through the 90- degree curve
from Hunter Lane to Orchard Place, and match the reconstructed street width of Culligan Lane
(east) to the existing 30 foot street width of Culligan Lane (west). Other opinions on the Hunter
Lane /Orchard Place street design are as follows:
Street
Width
29'
36' at Victoria
29'
36' at Victoria
27' -28'
36' at Victoria
28' throughout
29'
36' at Victoria
Curb
Type
Barrier
Barrier
Combination —
Barrier and
Surmountable
Combination —
Barrier and
Surmountable
Barrier
Street Width: page 76
The minimum width by engineering standards that can accommodate parking on both sides of
the street is 30 feet; however, due to the relatively low traffic volume on Hunter Lane and
Orchard Place, staff believes this parking pattern can be maintained with a 29 foot street width.
If on- street parking becomes an issue, it can be addressed at a later date. Other on- street parking
versus street width recommendations are as follows:
1. 28 foot street width could support on- street parking restricted to one side only.
2. 27 foot street width would likely not support on street parking in a manner consistent
with public safety requirements.
3. Mendota Heights Public Safety recommends the following:
a. 33 foot street width for parking on both sides of the street
b. 30 foot street width if parking is restricted to one side only
c. Could go as narrow as 26 foot street width if parking is prohibited completely
Curb Type:
The City standard for curbing is the barrier style (B618) curb. Staff (engineering, public works,
and emergency responders) prefers this curb style for a number of reasons:
1. B618 curb is far easier to plow without damaging landscaping behind the curb
(surmountable style curb provides no guide for the plow blade).
2. B618 curb handles storm water drainage far better than the surmountable curb.
3. B618 curb provides a measure of public safety by keeping vehicles in the roadway.
4. B618 curb has a longer life span as it is damaged less by snow removal activities.
5. B618 will undoubtedly be required in several areas throughout the project due to drainage
issues, and staff prefers to have a constant curb type throughout the project.
BUDGET IMPACT
The total estimated cost of the project is $2,399,195.96. Complete budgetary information was
published in the October 2nd staff memo.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the comments received from Council at the October 2nd Public Hearing, staff
recommends ordering the improvements with the details listed below incorporated into the
design, and authorize staff to prepare the plans and specifications for the reconstruction of
Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East); and the rehabilitation of Culligan Lane
(West), Glenhill Road, Orchard Circle, and Veronica Lane:
1. 29 foot constant street width for Hunter Lane and Orchard Place north of the Veronica
Lane /Culligan Lane intersection.
2. 36 foot street width from the Veronica Lane /Culligan Lane intersection south to Victoria
Curve (transitions in width will be accomplished at property lines)
3. Street width will remain 29 feet through the 90 degree curve connecting Hunter Lane and
Orchard Place
4. B618 (Barrier Curb) for the entire project (except at driveway entrances)
If city council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting A
RESOLUTION ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND PREPARATION OF
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HUNTER AND ORCHARD
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT #200902). This action requires a four
fifths majority vote.
page 77
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2012-
A RESOLUTION ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HUNTER AND ORCHARD NEIGHBORHOOD
IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT #200902)
WHEREAS, the city council adopted Resolution 2012 -70 on August 21, 2012 setting the date for a
public hearing on the proposed improvements to Culligan Lane, Glenhill Road, Hunter Lane, Orchard Circle,
Orchard Place and Veronica Lane; and
WHEREAS, ten (10) days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing were given
and the hearing was held on the 2nd day of October, 2012, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given
an opportunity to be heard thereon on the question of the proposed construction of the following described
improvements:
Street reconstruction improvements consisting of, but not limited to, bituminous milling or removal,
bituminous reclamation grading, water main replacement, storm sewer, sanitary sewer lift station
rehabilitation, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and appurtenant work to
the existing rural street section for Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane.
Street rehabilitation improvements consisting of, but not limited to, bituminous milling or removal,
bituminous reclamation, catch basin repair, concrete curb and gutter repair, bituminous surfacing and
appurtenant work to the existing urban street section for Culligan Lane, Glenhill Road, Orchard
Circle, and Veronica Lane.
WHEREAS, the proposed assessable area for said improvements is situated within the City of
Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and includes those parcels that currently have driveway access
on the project.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows:
1. Such improvements are necessary, cost - effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility
report.
2. That the city engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and
specifications for said improvement.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this sixteenth day of October, 2012.
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor
ATTEST
Lorri Smith, City Clerk
Hunter and Orchard
Neighborhood Improvements
Revised Site Plan
October 11, 2012
0
400
SCALE IN FEET
page 78
City of
Mendota
Heights
Legend
Proposed Street Width
29' Typical Section
30' Typical Section
36' Typical Section
i /;
i / ;i;.
' /*
'
i �i ' .
i//
,/
i / ///'
/
%f j
r
fir` " � ■ � � t� -- — I
18u3
I j
1861 •
I i
1870 I 1 I
1880
I 1140 I
1890 I j
08
16
I 3'1
��► 6! * I j
`4V
/Ns. N- ` li } -; 1 1205: 199 j 1187
06 ! 1200 1190 09
I
I
2 j o •
• 1 j
Hunter and Orchard
Neighborhood Improvements
Enlarged Site Plan (1 of 3)
October 11, 2012
0
40
SCALE IN FEET
age 79
City of
Mendota
Heights
Legend
Proposed B618 Curb and Gutter
Street Width Transition Area
29' Typical Section
30' Typical Section
36' Typical Section
Existing Edge of Roadway
VERONICA LN
0119
Hunter and Orchard
Neighborhood Improvements
Enlarged Site Plan (2 of 3)
October 11, 2012
0
50
SCALE IN FEET
age 80
City of
Mendota
Heights
Legend
Proposed B618 Curb and Gutter
29' Typical Section
30' Typical Section
36' Typical Section
Existing Edge of Roadway
yf
Hunter and Orchard
Neighborhood Improvements
Enlarged Site Plan (3 of 3)
October 11, 2012
0
40
SCALE IN FEET
age 81
nom j
City of
Mendota
Heights
Legend
Proposed B618 Curb and Gutter
29' Typical Section
30' Typical Section
36' Typical Section
Existing Edge of Roadway
ORCHARD PL
STANDARD CURB DETAILS
OCTOBER 2, 2012
rn
AA AA AAA
page 82
City of
Mendota
Heights
2
1)
0
:0/ 1 Vi
ii'l
1 \ w,
12 "RAD. I \
\
rRAD.
M
io
3'
6"
"
3 "RAD.
SLOPE 3/4" Ji "RAD.
PER FT
N
18"
26"
24'MAXIMUM 3'
}
SURMOUNTABLE
NOTE:
B618 CURB TO BE USED AT RADIUS
AND CATCH BASINS
B618
B618
EXPANSION JOINT
DRIVEWAY CURB CUT DETAIL (BOTH SIDES)
HUNTER AND ORCHARD
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS
29' TYPICAL SECTIONS
OCTOBER 11, 2012
AA AA AAA
page 83
City of
Mendota
Heights
EXISTING 22' TYPICAL SECTION
R.O.W. 60'
R.O.W.
Q
19' 11' 11' 19'
EXISTING
c GRADE
VARIES
VARIES
PROPOSED 29' TYPICAL SECTION WITH B618 CURB AND GUTTER (BARRIER)
R.O.W.
6.4Z.%7 3�1 MIL
VARIABLE y�
SLOPE — — —
60'
Q
30.33' B —B
R.O.W.
SOD BOULEVARD
WITH 4" TOPSOIL
PROPOSED 29' TYPICAL SECTION WITH SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER
R.O.W. 60' R.O.W.
4' n'PI
3:1 MA.
VARIA L��
SLOPE— —
Q
31.92' B —B
29' F —F
14.5' 14.5'
PROPOSED SURMOUNTABLE
GRADE CURB & GUTTER
3.0% 3.0%
4. M
SOD BOULEVARD
WITH 4" TOPSOIL
29'
F —F
14.5'
14.5'
PROPOSED
C GRADE
3.0%
B618 CONCRETE
CURB & GUTTER
3.0%�
SOD BOULEVARD
WITH 4" TOPSOIL
PROPOSED 29' TYPICAL SECTION WITH SURMOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER
R.O.W. 60' R.O.W.
4' n'PI
3:1 MA.
VARIA L��
SLOPE— —
Q
31.92' B —B
29' F —F
14.5' 14.5'
PROPOSED SURMOUNTABLE
GRADE CURB & GUTTER
3.0% 3.0%
4. M
SOD BOULEVARD
WITH 4" TOPSOIL