The URL can be used to link to this page

2012-10-02 Council PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA October 2, 2012 – 7:00 p.m. Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Pledge of Allegiance 4. Adopt Agenda 5. Consent Agenda a. Acknowledgement of September 18, 2012 City Council Minutes b. Acknowledgement of September 24, 2012 Planning Commission Minutes c. Approval of MSP Airport 2020 Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet Comment Letter d. Approval of Planning Case 2012-27, Wetlands Permit and Variance, Mendakota Country Club e. Receipt of September 2012 Building Activity Report f. Approval of Massage Therapist License, Laura Duncan g. Receipt of August 2012 Treasurer’s Report h. Approval of Contractors List i. Approval of Claims List 6. Public Comments 7. Public Hearings a. Marie Avenue Street Project Assessment Hearing b. Mendota Heights Road/Dianne Road Neighborhood Street Project Assessment Hearing c. Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Street Improvement Project Public Hearing 8. Unfinished and New Business a. Planning Case 2012-29, Request for a Conditional Use Permit for a Garage Greater than 1200 Square Feet, 1018 Overlook Road - Daniel Fleischhaker b. Planning Case 2012-30, Request for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance for a Detached Garage Greater than 750 Square Feet, 598 Sibley Memorial Highway, Robert and Danielle Whebbe 9. Council Comments 10. Adjourn CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, September 18, 2012 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota was held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Krebsbach called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: Councilmembers Duggan, Povolny, Petschel, and Vitelli. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council, the audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. AGENDA ADOPTION Mayor Krebsbach presented the agenda for adoption. Councilmember Petschel moved adoption of the agenda with an additional topic, APPOINTMENT OF PARKS COMMISSIONER TO THE REMAINING TERM. Councilmember Duggan seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Krebsbach presented the consent calendar and explained the procedure for discussion and approval. Councilmember Duggan moved approval of the consent calendar as presented and authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein; pulling items H) Approval of Resolution Accepting Gift to Police Department and K) Approval of Building Permit, 2455 Visitation Drive (Convent of the Visitation School). a. Acknowledgement of September 4, 2012 City Council Minutes b. Acknowledgement of September 11, 2012 Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes c. Acknowledgement of September 12, 2012 Airport Relations Commission Minutes d. Receipt of August 2012 Par 3 Report e. Receipt of August 2012 Fire Synopsis Report f. Approval of Out-of-State Travel Request g. Approval to Begin Recruitment and Hiring Process for Seasonal Employees h. Approval of Resolution Accepting Gift to Police Department i. Approval of Completion of Probationary Employment Period for Accounting Clerk Hristo Galiov page 2 j. Approval of Water Service Agreements for Lilydale Apartments, LLC and Lilydale Senior Living, LLC k. Approval of Building Permit, 2455 Visitation Drive (Convent of the Visitation School) l. Approval of Contractors List m. Approval of Claims List Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 CONSENT AGENDA TOPIC H) APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION ACCEPTING GIFT TO POLICE DEPARTMENT Councilmember Petschel stated that this is an acknowledgement of a gift to the Police Department on a call they handled on behalf of the Brenne family. She asked Chief of Police Michael Aschenbrener to explain what the call was and how it was handled. Chief Aschenbrener explained that a couple of weeks ago, the Police Department received a card and a donation of two children’s movies. Inside the card were smaller cards written by the children of the Brenne household to Sergeant Peterson. Apparently they had a suspicious person in their neighborhood and Sergeant Peterson put the family and the children very much at ease. When you are supervising children that are not your own, it’s nice to be able to pull out a movie and know that it is safe for children to watch. Councilmember Petschel moved Approval of Resolution Accepting Gift to Police Department Councilmember Vitelli seconded the motion. Councilmember Duggan also expressed congratulations to Sergeant Neil Garlock as an Unsung Hero for his dedication to the 5K Walk/Run that was started with the City’s fiftieth celebration and this year he has been given that award. Mayor Krebsbach also mentioned that annually she goes through one months’ worth of police reports to get a sense of the community and she recently went through the July reports. There were 635 calls in July in the City of Mendota Heights, approximately 65 in the City of Lilydale and less than that in Mendota. She is always impressed with the level at which the Police respond. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 K) APPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT, 2455 VISITATION DRIVE (CONVENT OF THE VISITATION SCHOOL) Dr. Dawn Nichols, Head of Convent of the Visitation School, explained the reason for this project. Convent of the Visitation School has a robust STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) Program and it has grown over time as one component of their overarching academic program, making a new updated facility necessary. This new facility would provide new space for their Physics, Engineering, and Robotics Programs. page 3 Mayor Krebsbach also noted this building permit does not require any variances or conditional use permits. Councilmember Duggan moved Approval of Building Permit, 2455 Visitation Drive (Convent of the Visitation School). Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. PRESENTATION A) DISTRICT 197 SUPERIN TENDENT DR. NANCY ALLEN-MASTRO Dr. Nancy Allen-Mastro, Superintendent of School District 197, was present to introduce herself to the Council. She started with the District on July 2, 2012 and has been spending most of her time getting to know the community. She has been working with City Administrator Justin Miller to discover additional ways the City and the District can expand their partnership. She expressed her pleasure and anticipation of continued work with the City and the City Council. B) DODD ROAD/HWY 110 PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT UPDATE City Engineer John Mazzitello explained that in 2009 the City of Mendota Heights was awarded a transportation enhancement grant from the Metropolitan Council Transportation Advisory Board for pedestrian safety improvements to be constructed at Dodd Road and Highway 110 in the year 2013. Staff has started the process of designing those improvements so they can be bid and ready to go next summer. City staff solicited proposals and brought forward a selected consultant, SRF Consulting Group, who is assisting with the design process. Two representatives from SRF Consulting Group were in attendance to give an update on the progress of the design. Mr. Matt Hansen, SRF Consulting Group, gave a brief description of the project and a status update on the work currently being completed. He touched on a few key design elements and the anticipated project schedule. The goal of this project is to improve pedestrian and bicycle safety at this intersection. Actions Taken • Feasibility study prepared and accepted in 2009 • Federal Funding Application • Design of the Project began in 2012, which is approximately fifty percent completed Next Steps • Construction to take place in 2013, most likely under traffic Status page 4 • Environmental documentation (Project Memorandum) as required when federal dollars are being used – approximately 75% complete, has been submitted to the staff for initial review and should be wrapped up soon • Construction plans are approximately 60% complete and have also been submitted to staff for review and comments • Construction observation will take place during construction; SRF will have inspectors on-site regularly as well as surveyors to stake the improvements and monitor the progress of the project Key Elements • Pedestrian crossing improvements • Aesthetic Options • Interstate Valley Creek Trail Councilmembers asked questions, which were answered by the representatives from SRF Consulting; topics included possible landscaping or aesthetic interest in the median, signal lighting and sound volume for the visually impaired, signal change buttons for pedestrians and bicyclists, size of median for pedestrian and bicyclists, and safety issues when unable to completely cross the intersection. PUBLIC HEARING A) CROWN POINT AND OVERLOOK NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Assistant City Engineer Ryan Ruzek explained that staff annually updates a five-year street improvement plan, which was approved by the City Council on December 6, 2011. Crown Point and Overlook Street Rehabilitation was identified as a 2013 project. The project includes Crown Circle, Crown Court, Crown Point Drive, Lilac Road between Marie Avenue and Douglas Road, Overlook Lane, Overlook Road, and Summit Lane between Marie Avenue and Overlook Road. On May 1, 2012 the City Council authorized staff to create the feasibility report, which was presented and approved by City Council on August 7, 2012. The City’s Street Rehabilitation Policy is to assess fifty percent of the assessable costs to the benefiting property owners. Residents can pay the assessment outright or put it on their property taxes over a ten- year period. City costs include curb and gutter replacement, sod restoration, and is proposing to overlay the Marie Park parking lot and the trail in Marie Park. Based on the City’s policy, one hundred percent of the preventative maintenance costs would be financed by the city. Funding Sources • Total estimated costs equals $913,453.50 o $299,300 would come through special assessments o The City would bond for the remaining $614,153.50 Project Schedule (once approved) • Public Hearing – September 18, 2012 page 5 • Plans to Council for approval in January 2013 • Bidding the project in March 2013 • Accepting bids and awarding the contract in April 2013 • Construction would begin mid-May or early June 2013 • Project complete by August 2013 • Assessment Hearing – October 2013 Councilmember Duggan asked if the neighborhood residents have been surveyed for sprinkler systems and invisible fences. Mr. Ruzek replied that on a project of this nature, staff would generally not send out a survey ahead of time requesting that type of information. When the project is nearing construction, approximately three weeks prior, the residents would be informed of the project schedule and requesting them to contact the City if they have an irrigation system or pet fence; they could then come into the office and staff would provide them with free flags to mark those areas. Councilmember Duggan also asked about the concept of installing rain gardens. Mr. Ruzek replied that this has not actually been calculated because it has existing curb, gutter, and storm sewer; however, staff is always willing to work with residents if they would like to construct a rain garden. Mr. Matt Nelson, 909 Carmen Lane, commented that he agrees with most everything that has been reported about the streets. One of his concerns is the fact that there are four different garbage haulers using the streets. The cul-de-sac where he lives is in pretty bad shape and he is concerned about having to pay for street repair. He suggested the city take a look at having one hauler per district, and going out for bid. Mayor Krebsbach replied that this has been a topic of discussion many times and it has been suggested that neighborhood residents get together and coordinate the decision on one garbage hauler for their neighborhood. Mr. Neil Denbleyker, 1952 Crown Point Drive, addressed the scope of the project by saying that it seems there is not a prioritization of the needs. The frontage road, Carmen Lane, is deplorable as it is too narrow, has poor grade, and it is very difficult to make the turn off of Highway 110 without jumping the curb. It has a bituminous curb, which was knocked out after the first snowfall. To replace the bituminous curb with another bituminous curb is not resourceful. He agrees there are areas on Crown Point that are in very poor condition but there is a substantial area that only needs sealcoating. He suggested there be a reallocation of the funds to make the frontage road safer for everyone and so the snowplows do not damage the bituminous curb, and complete maintenance on Crown Point rather than the total street replacement. City Engineer John Mazzitello replied that Carmen Lane was turned over to the City by the State. It is on the City’s radar for future reconstruction. The City is due money for maintenance of that road that has not been received yet from the State. When that money is received, there are plans to reconstruct the frontage road to City standards. In regards to the Crown Point subdivision, several years ago residents came to staff and asked for a rehabilitation of their subdivision. Upon inspection, staff found that a majority of the surface was in page 6 poor condition. There are spots that are in better condition than others, but when a subdivision is rehabilitated, staff recommends reconstructing the entire subdivision so it all wears the same. Mr. Leroy Burling, 913 Crown Court, asked if the properties in the assessment roll would be assessed per foot or per lot. City Engineer John Mazzitello confirmed that the properties would be assessed per lot. Mr. Burling then asked who is paying for the improvements on Carmen Lane. City Engineer Mazzitello replied that the City’s street reconstruction policy specifically states that preventative maintenance would be paid for one hundred percent by the City. Mr. Steve Kleinglass, 1029 Marie Avenue, stated that he has frontage on Marie but his driveway is off of Summit. He asked if he would be assessed for the Summit Lane reconstruction and if he would be assessed again when Marie Avenue is reconstructed. City Engineer Mazzitello replied that properties are only assessed once. He is being assessed for the Summit Lane reconstruction because that is where his access point is, even though his address is Marie Avenue. Mr. Dan Mccollar, 1089 Overlook Road, asked for clarification on the amount being assessed per lot. Mr. Ruzek replied that, based on the City’s policy the assessment amount would be $4,454.19; however, staff is proposing to cap that amount at $3,650. Mr. Vladimir Lamin, 906 Crown Court, asked why staff is recommending a complete rehabilitation of the Crown Point Neighborhood instead of doing crack sealing and sealcoating as on Carmen Lane. City Engineer Mazzitello replied that the age of the Crown Point Subdivision and the condition of the pavement is such that a sealcoat would only last a year or two and is not worth the expense. It is worn to the point where it needs to have the pavement surface replaced. There being no further comments from the public, Councilmember Duggan moved to close the public hearing. Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Councilmember Duggan moved adoption of A RESOLUTION ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CROWN POINT & OVERLOOK NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201207). Councilmember Povolny seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 APPOINTMENT OF PARKS COMMISSIONER TO THE REMAINING TERM Mayor Krebsbach explained there are two years left on an open seat on the Parks Commission. The City Council interviewed two candidates and is recommending the appointment of Mr. Joel Paper. Mayor Krebsbach expressed her appreciation to Dr. Patrick Powers for applying. Councilmember Duggan moved to approve the appointment of Mr. Joel Paper to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Councilmember Petschel seconded the motion. Ayes: 5 page 7 Nays: 0 COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Vitelli commended all of the many outstanding students in the community. He pointed out one in particular, who is the daughter of a fire captain, Rachel Goldenstein. She attended St. Matthews School in St. Paul and also went to Cretin-Derham Hall. This spring she graduated with honors in biology from the University of St. Thomas. The reason he singled her out is because she has received a full tuition scholarship to the Mayo Graduate School for a PhD in Immunology. Councilmember Petschel echoed Councilmember Duggan’s recognition of Neil Garlock as the 2012 Law Enforcement Torch Run Unsung Hero. She also recognized Neil Garlock and John Larrive for responding to a medical emergency of a 67-year-old woman who was not breathing. These two officers began resuscitation and continued until the paramedics arrived. The resident was resuscitated and transported to the hospital. This is just an example of how the community and residents are in good hands. Councilmember Duggan announced the birth of his new granddaughter, expressed his appreciation of the residents who attended and participated in the Lilydaze Festival, passed along information about coyotes in an area to Chief Aschenbrener, passed along concerns of residents about the condition of the grass on Wagon Wheel, the speed of traffic on Wagon Wheel, and the speed of traffic on Swan Drive at Lake Drive to City Engineer Mazzitello, and received confirmation that there will be a bonfire this year on October 31st at Mendota Plaza from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m.. Councilmember Duggan also asked what is going on at Interstate 35 and Hwy 13 with all of the huge pipes and the maze of construction. City Engineer John Mazzitello replied that Interstate Valley Creek Trail was never paved from the watermain project because it was known that Xcel Energy was going to come in and rip it up anyway for a gas main project. This is a gas main project, which should be completed in a couple of weeks. After that, the trail will be paved. Councilmember Povolny asked Chief Aschenbrener if the new SUV squad vehicles would be the new standard going forward. Chief Aschenbrener replied there were two options for new squads this year, a Ford Taurus and the Ford Explorer. Staff opted for ordering two Ford Explorers. The decision on what will be ordered next year will be made late this year, and will be based on how the SUVs are received, how they hold up, and the cost of operating them. Mayor Krebsbach asked why the construction on Marie Avenue took longer than expected. City Engineer John Mazzitello replied that in addition to weather delays, the water main installation had trouble passing their tests after the pipe was installed. Staff would not let them proceed with the project until the pipe passed the tests. Mayor Krebsbach asked who is supposed to water the boulevard lawn along Wagon Wheel. Engineer Mazzitello stated that at the completion of a project, the right-of-way maintenance is reverted back to the adjacent property owner who is responsible for the landscaping all of the way to the curb. However, he does not believe that was thoroughly communicated with the property owners during the Wagon Wheel project. Staff was concerned about several other things with curb adjustments, the reconstruction page 8 as a whole, and individual property concerns that needed to be addressed. So in the spring the City is going to replace the boulevard sod that has died. At that time, the adjacent property owners would be responsible for water and maintenance. Mayor Krebsbach also commended the All Mendota Heights Football Game with Sibley and St. Thomas. There were many teenagers at the game and there were no incidents that she was aware of. ADJOURN Mayor Krebsbach adjourned the meeting at 8:45 p.m. ____________________________________ Sandra Krebsbach Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Lorri Smith City Clerk page 9 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 24, 2012 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Monday, September 24, 2012, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 P.M. The following Commissioners were present: Chair Norton, Commissioners Field, Hennes, Magnuson, Noonan, Roston, and Viksnins. Those absent: None. Those present were Assistant to the City Administrator Jake Sedlacek, Public Works Director/City Engineer Mazzitello, and NAC Planner Stephen Grittman. Minutes were recorded by Heidi Guenther. Approval of Agenda The agenda was approved as submitted. Approval of August 28, 2012, Minutes COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF AUGUST 28, 2012, AS PRESENTED. AYES: 7 NAYS: 0 Hearings PLANNING CASE #2012-27 Mendakota Country Club 2075 Mendakota Drive Wetlands Permit and Variance to Improve the Driving Range Net Planner Stephen Grittman presented the request of Mendakota Country Club for approval of a wetlands permit and fence height variance to construct a new fence at the end of their driving range along a berm which is adjacent to an existing wetland. Mr. Grittman noted that to construct the fence within 100 feet of the wetland, a new wetlands permit is required. The fence, as proposed would be 25 feet in height, which requires a variance. Mr. Grittman presented staff’s analysis of the request and recommended approval of both the wetlands permit and the variance. He noted the proposed fence will have little or no impact on the wetland area and will not raise concerns over visibility or compatibility of the use with the area. Commissioner Viksnins questioned if the current 12-foot fence had a variance. Mr. Grittman was uncertain if a variance was approved for Mendakota. Commissioner Hennes asked if the existing 12-foot fence would be removed. Mr. Grittman stated this was the case. Chair Norton opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Norton asked for a motion to close the public hearing. page 10 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER FIELD, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE WETLAND PERMIT AND VARIANCE AS REQUESTED BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT. AYES 7 NAYS 0 Chair Norton advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 2, 2012, meeting. PLANNING CASE #2012-28 Curt Skallerup, VIRGO, LLC 2250 Pilot Knob Road Conditional Use Permit Planner Stephen Grittman presented the request of Curt Skallerup of Virgo, LLC for approval of a conditional use permit for an indoor trampoline park. Mr. Grittman noted that the applicants are seeking approval of a trampoline park within a facility at 2500 Pilot Knob Road. He reviewed the proposed site plan noting the property was zoned Industrial. The proposed hours of operation would be from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. The indoor facility would accommodate entertainment and fitness training through the use of several clusters of enclosed trampoline structures. The facility would include different series of trampoline-based recreation areas and party rooms for the use of groups gathering at the site. The proposed use is a form of commercial recreation, similar in nature to a fitness club, bowling center, or similar use. These uses are commonly found in the B-3, General Business District or B-4, Shopping Center zoning districts. Those districts may allow such a use either as a permitted or conditional use. In the Industrial district, the closest comparative use is “Participative Athletics,” allowed through a conditional use permit. Mr. Grittman presented staff’s analysis of the request and did not recommend approval of the conditional use permit at this time. The proposed use appears to raise concern over its compatibility with industrial use areas. If the application is to move forward, staff recommends tabling action for the current meeting with a request that the application provide additional detail about the traffic and parking impacts of the facility on the neighboring properties. The commission expressed support for the use within the industrial zone, agreeing with the planner that they needed more detail on the traffic and parking impacts of the use on surrounding properties. Curt Skallerup, 729 Windsor Creek Drive of South Lake, Texas, addressed the Commissions comments. He noted he had already been approved for insurance at the proposed site and would need approximately 50-60 parking stalls. He described the proposed flow of traffic through the site. Mr. Skallerup understood the safety concerns, given the fact the use would appeal to children. He described the anticipated daily schedule of activities noting he would be offering core fitness classes for adults in the morning, with more activities offered after school and in the evening hours. However, the majority of its business would take place on the weekends and this worked well in Industrial parks. Mr. Skallerup noted he had one park open in Fort Worth, Texas with five other parks in the planning phase. Commissioner Magnuson requested further information on the surrounding industrial uses in the area. Carl Awalt, RMR, noted the other tenant was Restaurant Technologies and they made pumps for restaurant grease. He described that all truck traffic was on the north side of the building and would not interfere with children entering and exiting the site. page 11 Commissioner Magnuson inquired if the applicant had considered the peak hours of traffic for both uses on the site. Mr. Awalt explained that Restaurant Technologies’ employees were off the site by 5:00 p.m. on weekdays and were not open on the weekends. He found the two uses to be very compatible. Commissioner Magnuson questioned if any analysis had been completed on how the traffic to this site would adversely affect the surrounding businesses, roadways, etc. Mr. Skallerup indicated the site had limited capacity, reducing the potential impacts on traffic. He noted he had not completed any traffic flow analysis, but was pleased with the number of major roadways that led to the site. Commissioner Roston questioned how the applicant felt about delaying approval for 30 days to allow for additional information to be gathered for staff. Mr. Skallerup indicated he would support this recommendation. Commissioner Viksnins inquired if the applicant would be able to complete a traffic study in the coming weeks. Mr. Skallerup stated he would investigate this further if deemed necessary for approval. Chair Norton opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Norton asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER FIELD MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO APPROVE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT, DIRECTING THE APPLICANT TO WORK WITH STAFF TO ADDRESS TRAFFIC RELATED ISSUES. Discussion included adding conditions to the approval, and whether or not the commission had enough information to make a decision on the request. AYES 2 (ROSTON AND HENNES) NAYS 5 (NOONAN, VIKSNINS, MAGNUSON, FIELD AND CHAIR NORTON) COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO TABLE THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO THE OCTOBER 23RD PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DIRECTING STAFF TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON THE PENDING DETAILS REGARDING THE SPECIFIC SITE USE, BUILDING PLANS, PARKING AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT, AND OTHER ASPECTS OF THE FACILITY ON THE SUBJECT SITE. AYES 6 NAYS 1 (ROSTON) Chair Norton advised the Planning Commission would reconsider this application at its October 23, 2012, meeting. PLANNING CASE #2012-29 Daniel Fleischhaker 1018 Overlook Road Conditional Use Permit Chair Norton excused himself from the meeting at 7:58 p.m. page 12 Planner Stephen Grittman presented the request of Daniel Fleischhaker for approval of a conditional use permit for a garage greater than 1,200 square feet and a variance for more than three doors on a garage. Mr. Grittman noted that the applicant was requesting to construct a garage addition that was approximately 700 square feet, which would bring the property’s total garage space on the property to approximately 1,470 square feet. The addition would be accessed via a double-wide garage door. The applicant has indicated that the exterior materials of the proposed garage would be consistent with the existing garage and meets all setback requirements. Staff then discussed the variance review standards. Mr. Grittman presented staff’s analysis of the request and recommended approval of the conditional use permit based upon the finding the applicant shall revise his existing conditional use permit request for the construction of a single-door garage expansion, as opposed to a double-door. Chair Norton returned to the meeting at 8:02 p.m. Commissioner Magnuson inquired why the City had a standard within City Code restricting the number of garage doors. Mr. Grittman explained that when the Code was amended, the City was addressing concerns with the architectural impact of homes having four or more garage doors facing the street. Mr. Sedlacek discussed the recent code amendment in further detail with the Commission. Daniel Fleischhaker, 1018 Overlook Road, questioned when the change was made to City Code regarding the number of garage doors. Mr. Sedlacek explained this portion of the City Code was amended two years ago. Mr. Fleischhaker reviewed several photographs with the Commission showing garages with two double doors or a single double door and two single doors in Mendota Heights. Mr. Fleischhaker stated the double door would make it easier for him and his family to move items in and out of the garage. In addition, the aesthetics would be more appealing. He commented he could make a 12-foot door work if necessary, but that would not be his first choice. The commission asked the applicant to better define the unique circumstances and practical difficulties which would justify the variance. Chair Norton opened the public hearing. Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Norton asked for a motion to close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND DENIAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT. Commissioner Roston requested the motions be separated for this request. Commissioner Noonan suggested action be taken on the variance first. REVISED MOTION COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT. page 13 AYES 2 (MAGNUSON AND VIKSNINS NAYS 5 (ROSTON, HENNES, NOONAN, FIELD AND CHAIR NORTON) COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER FIELD, TO TABLE ACTION ON THE VARIANCE TO THE OCTOBER 23, 2012 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. AYES 6 NAYS 1 (VIKSNINS) COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT, SUBJECT TO THE ADDITIONAL CONDITION THAT EITHER THE APPLICANT REVISE HIS REQUEST FOR A SINGLE CAR GARAGE DOOR EXPANSION OR THAT HE OBTAIN A VARIANCE FOR A DOUBLE GARAGE DOOR. AYES 7 NAYS 0 Chair Norton advised the Planning Commission would reconsider the variance application at its October 23, 2012, meeting. Chair Norton advised the City Council would consider the conditional use permit application at its October 2, 2012, meeting. PLANNING CASE #2012-30 Robert Whebbe 598 Sibley Memorial Highway Conditional Use Permit Planner Stephen Grittman presented the request of Robert Whebbe for approval of a conditional use permit for a detached garage and variance for a detached garage greater than 750 square feet. Mr. Grittman noted that the applicant has an attached garage of approximately 300 square feet. The zoning ordinance allows for one garage building on a single-family property. Detached garages are allowed by conditional use permit; however, the maximum size of a detached garage is 750 square feet. The applicant is requesting one of two options, while retaining the existing attached garage: Option A – Three doors; 1,500 square feet (30 feet x 50 feet) Option B – Three doors; 1,024 square feet (32 feet x 32 feet) Mr. Grittman explained the new garage structure would be built to the side and rear of the existing house, partially on an adjoining parcel owned by the applicant. To avoid violating building setbacks, this parcel should be combined with the house parcel through the Dakota County Recorder’s office. Mr. Grittman presented staff’s analysis of the request and recommended approval of the conditional use permit to allow for a detached accessory structure upon the subject property only insofar as the applicant can design it in such a way as to comply with other zoning standards of the ordinance. This would require remodeling of the existing attached garage to living space and redesign of the proposed garage to meet the 750 square foot area standard. The alternative would be to eliminate the detached garage request and expand the existing attached garage. Staff does not recommend approval of the associated variance to allow the structure to exceed 750 square feet in size. Commissioner Viksnins questioned which findings of fact should be adopted by the Commission this evening. Mr. Grittman reviewed the recommended findings of fact with the Commission. page 14 Robert Whebbe, 598 Sibley Memorial Highway, thanked the Commission for considering his request this evening. He explained the proposed garage size would allow him to keep his collector cars indoors as his vehicles have been broken into twice in the past two years. The building would provide greater security. He noted that 70% of his neighbors have signed off on his proposal. Commissioner Magnuson questioned how the applicant planned to use the existing attached garage space. Mr. Whebbe stated he could turn this into living space. Chair Norton asked if an attached garage was an option. Mr. Whebbe stated the steep grade of his property would not allow for a useable driveway. In addition, his water and gas meters would need to be moved, and the kitchen would have to be reconfigured to allow for an entrance into the home. He would prefer to have the garage attached; however, this was not feasible. Chair Norton opened the public hearing. Jennifer Purtell, 564 Hiawatha Avenue, questioned if the garage would be one or two story. Mr. Whebbe indicated the garage would be single story. Mr. Sedlacek submitted two items for the record regarding this Planning Case. He noted the City Clerk received a phone call from Rose Karsten at 580 Sibley Memorial Highway, and she fully supported the garage request. Secondly, Nancy Kane of 586 Sibley Memorial Highway submitted a letter stating she supported only a 750 square foot garage with a minimal amount of asphalt. COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES 7 NAYS 0 COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS REQUESTED BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. SUCH PLANS, DRAWN TO SCALE, SHALL BE MODIFIED TO SPECIFY PROPOSED FINISH MATERIALS, COLORS, AND STRUCTURE HEIGHT. 2. THE GARAGE NOT EXCEED 15 FEET IN HEIGHT. 3. THE APPLICANT COORDINATE THE GARAGE’S ROOF STYLE AND ROOF PITCH WITH THAT OF THE PRINCIPAL BUILDING. 4. THE EXISTING ATTACHED GARAGE ON THE SITE BE REPURPOSED AS LIVING SPACE AS A PART OF THIS PROJECT, TO COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM ALLOWANCE OF ONE GARAGE STRUCTURE ON A SINGLE FAMILY PARCEL. Commissioner Field requested Condition 1 be removed from the motion. Commissioners Roston and Noonan supported this request. AYES 7 NAYS 0 page 15 COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST BASED ON THE FINDINGS OF FACT DETAILED IN THE STAFF REPORT, ITEMS 3, 4, 6 AND 7. Commissioner Roston apologized for the denial recommendation, but stated the Commission had to follow the zoning code for this request. AYES 7 NAYS 0 Chair Norton advised the City Council would consider this application at its October 2, 2012, meeting. Verbal Review Mr. Sedlacek gave the following verbal review: PLANNING CASE #2012-13 City of Mendota Heights Zoning Code Amendment • This item would be discussed in a work shop setting by the City Council on October 30th COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER FIELD, TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:53 P.M. AYES 7 NAYS 0 Respectfully submitted, Heidi Guenther, Recording Secretary page 16 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Justin Miller, City Administrator SUBJECT: Comment Letter on MSP International Airport 2020 Improvement Plan Draft Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet BACKGROUND The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is in the process of developing their 2020 improvements plan, and as such is required to conduct an environmental assessment/environmental assessment worksheet (EA/EAW). Part of this assessment includes an opportunity for adjacent communities to provide input before the final EA/EAW is completed. Attached to this report is a letter that outlines what staff believes are key issues that the MAC should include in the final EA/EAW. The deadline to provide this letter to MAC is October 11, 2012. The entire EA/EAW is over 2400 pages long, so attaching it to this report is not possible. However, the full version is available on the MAC’s website at: http://www.mspairport.com/about-msp/msp-2020-ea.aspx BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mendota Heights City Council approve the attached letter providing comments on the 2020 Improvements Draft Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet. This action requires a majority vote of the city council. page 17 October 3, 2012 MSP 2020 Improvements Draft EA/EAW File C/O Environment Department Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 Dear Mr. Fuhrmann: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport 2020 Improvement Plan Draft Environmental Assessment/Environmental Assessment Worksheet. The City of Mendota Heights recognizes MSP as a significant economic asset to the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area and the State of Minnesota. As a community adjacent to the airport, we support these planning efforts as a means for us to better oversee land use and development within our own borders. In reviewing the draft EA/EAW, the City of Mendota Heights wishes to remind the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) of the conditions that were placed on the 2030 Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) for MSP International Airport by the Metropolitan Council on June 23, 2010. Specifically, the following conditions should be adhered to: 1) The MAC will update the plan every five years and that the first update is prepared by 2015. 2) MAC should initiate a capacity study two years in advance of when MSP is expected to have 540,000 annual operations and incorporate the results of this study into the following LTCP update. 3) MAC should initiate an FAA Part 150 study update (which includes a comprehensive noise analysis and mitigation program), in consultation with the MSP Noise Oversight Committee, when the forecast level of operations five years into the future exceeds the levels mitigated in the Consent Decree (582,366 annual operations). The results of this study should be incorporated into the first subsequent LTCP update. page 18 4) The LTCP needs to acknowledge that storm water from MSP detention ponds discharges to the reaches of the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers that are identified as water-quality impaired for a number of pollutants and stressors. In addition to these previously agreed to conditions, the City of Mendota Heights would like to address several other concerns: 1) We understand that the draft EA/EAW was completed before the impacts of the proposed Performance Based Navigation (PBN) procedures were known. These new procedures could have a significant impact on areas within our city, and we are hopeful that the final EA/EAW includes an analysis of these new procedures. 2) At their January 18, 2012 meeting, the Noise Oversight Committee voted to recommend that “noise mitigation in the draft MSP 2020 Improvements EA/EAW be provided in a manner consistent with the provisions of the consent decree, offering the same mitigation, per noise impact level, with eligibility defined by the 2020 alternative 2 – airlines relocate DNL noise contours, beginning when the threshold of 484,897 total operations is reached or in the year 2020, whichever comes first.” The City of Mendota Heights urges the MAC to abide by this recommendation in the final EA/EAW. Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this important planning document. We look forward to continue working with the Metropolitan Airports Commission on making the MSP International Airport an even more important economic asset to the metropolitan area, state, and region, while recognizing the impacts it has on the surrounding communities. If you need further information, please contact city administrator Justin Miller at (651) 255-1153 or justinm@mendota-heights.com. Sincerely, Sandra Krebsbach Mayor cc: Mendota Height City Council Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission page 19 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator SUBJECT: Planning Case 2012-27, Wetlands Permit and Variance BACKGROUND Mendakota Country Club is seeking permission to install a new net on their driving range located at 2075 Mendakota Drive. The new net would be placed 15 feet closer to the wetland and would stand 25 feet tall. The property is guided as golf course, zoned as single-family residential and operates as a golf course under a conditional use permit. Mr. Grittman reviewed his planning memo which has been attached. The planning commission discussed whether or not the 25 foot tall net needs to move closer to the wetland to be effective. The commission came to consensus that planning materials showed that the location and height is necessary to resolve the current issues with players hitting beyond the fence. There were no comments at the public hearing. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION The planning commission voted to pass a motion recommending approval of the request 7:0. This matter requires a simple majority vote by the council. If the city council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION APPROVING A WETLANDS PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR A HITTING RANGE NET AT 2075 MENDAKOTA DRIVE. page 20 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A WETLANDS PERMIT AND VARIANCE FOR A DRIVING RANGE NET AT 2075 MENDAKOTA DRIVE. WHEREAS, Steve Watson has applied for a wetlands permit and a variance to allow a 25 foot tall fence for the replacement of the driving range net at Mendakota Country Club, 2075 Mendakota Drive (PID 27-02600-77-014, SECTION 26 TWN 28 RANGE 23 26 28 23 PT S 1/2 OF SE 1/4 COM NE) as proposed in planning case 2012-27; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meeting September 24, 2012. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that a wetlands permit and variance as proposed in planning case 2012-27 is hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed fence will not have any negative impacts on the adjoining wetland 2. The applicants propose to retain the existing drainage and natural vegetation in the area. 3. The proposed fence height and location are important factors in putting the property to reasonable use as a golf course 4. There are practical difficulties in continuing the current driving range use with either the existing fence, or a relocated fence that would meet the city’s height standard. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ___________________________ Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST ______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 21 MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Stephen W. Grittman DATE: September 20, 2012 MEETING DATE: September 25, 2012 SUBJECT: Wetlands Permit and Variance for Driving Range Fence Height CASE NO: NAC Case 254.04 – 12.19 APPLICANT(S): Mendakota Country Club LOCATION: 2075 Mendakota Drive ZONING: R-1, Single Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: GC – Golf Course Background and Description of Request: Mendakota Country Club is seeking a Wetlands Permit and Fence Height Variance to construct a new fence at the end of their driving range along a berm which is adjacent to an existing wetland. The fence is designed to contain golf balls used on the range which have cleared the existing fence. The applicants note that many golf balls have ended up in the wetland, and some have become a danger for other players on the course. To construct the fence within 100 feet of the wetland, a new wetlands permit is required. The fence, as proposed, would be 25 feet in height. The zoning ordinance provides that fences in residential districts be no greater than 6 feet in height, although there is a specific provision for fences enclosing tennis courts at 10 feet in height. To accommodate a 25 foot-high fence would require the variance. page 22 2 Analysis: Wetland Permit. The purpose of the wetland regulations is to ensure that any construction or land alteration within 100 feet of a wetland is conducted in a manner that avoids any negative impacts to the wetland and water resource. In this case, the applicants propose only to sink support posts into the ground along the peak of the berm on the west side of the wetland. The installation of the fence posts is unlikely to impact the wetland in any way, as the construction would last just a few days. The applicants have stated that they propose to retain the natural vegetation adjacent to the wetland area. In this regard, it does not appear that the proposed fence construction would be a concern for the wetland with regard to erosion, water quality, vegetation, or in any other manner. Moreover, better protection of the wetland from range balls would result in less need or interest to dredge the pond for lost balls, allowing the water to remain settled without this concern. In this way, the water quality may actually be enhanced in the long term. Variance. The proposed height of the fence, as noted above, would be 25 feet from the top of the berm on which it is to be installed. The current fence is constructed at 12 feet of height, about 15 feet farther west (farther from the wetland). When considering variances, the City is required to find that: (1) The applicant is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner; and (2) The applicant’s proposal faces practical difficulties in using the property in this manner due to circumstances that: a. Are unique to the property, b. Are not caused by the applicant, c. Are consistent with the purpose and intent of the City’s plans and ordinances, d. Are not out of character with the locality, or neighborhood, in which the property is located. As a golf course, the applicants suggest that maintenance of a driving range is an important aspect of course operation. The current condition tends to minimize the utility of the range, and also endangers golfers on part of the course. The proposed fence is actually a net designed for this purpose, and should have negligible visual impacts on any nearby properties. The applicants have also conducted an analysis of golf ball flight, and suggest that the proposed height and location are important to the fence’s effectiveness. According to the material supplied by the applicants, construction of the fence as proposed will contain approximately 98% of the range balls, dramatically improving the function of the current range. They are also proposing other operational changes to ensure the effectiveness of the fence and the existing facility. page 23 3 Finally, golf courses are allowed in the R-1 zoning district, but are clearly distinct from normal single family uses. The fence height identified in the zoning ordinance is adequate for most situations, when it is utilized for purposes of security, privacy or containment – even for non-residential uses in the district. However, this use is a special purpose otherwise not contemplated by the ordinance. The unique application of this particular fence suggests that there are practical difficulties in putting the property to its historic – and reasonable – use. With these findings, the applicants should be able to qualify for variance consideration. Action Requested: Following a public hearing, the Planning Commission may consider the following alternative recommendations: Wetlands Permit 1. Approval of the Wetlands Permit, based on a finding that the proposed fence will not have any negative impacts on the adjoining wetland, and that the applicants propose to retain the existing drainage and natural vegetation in the area. 2. Denial of the Wetlands Permit, based on concern that the proposed fence is incompatible with wetland protection objectives. Variance 1. Approval of the variance, based on a finding that the proposed fence height and location are important factors in putting the property to reasonable use as a golf course, and that there are practical difficulties in continuing the current driving range use with either the existing fence, or a relocated fence that would meet the City’s height standard. 2. Denial of the variance, based on a finding that the applicants have not shown that the proposed fence height is necessary to continue reasonable use of the property. Staff Recommendation: Planning staff recommends both the Wetland Permit and the Variance. As noted above, the proposed fence will have little or no impact on the wetland area. Moreover, the fence height will not raise concerns over visibility or compatibility of the use with the area, and it will enhance the use of the existing golf course, a permitted use in the zoning district. Supplementary Materials: Application materials dated August 22, 2012 page 24 Jake Sedlacek Assistant to the Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 August 22, 2012 Mr. Sedlacek It was a pleasure to meet with you last week. Per our discussion, I am requesting, on behalf of Mendakota Country Club, located at 2075 Mendakota Drive, in Mendota Heights, MN a conditional use permit, a wet lands permit and a fence height variance to allow Mendakota to extend our driving range fence from its current height (12 ft) to 25 ft in height. In additional to the increase in height, Mendakota plans to relocate the existing fence ~ 15 feet to the East which will place it on top of an existing 4 ft berm. Mendakota has main 2 reasons for making this request: 1 to provide additional protection from range balls carrying over the existing fence toward the golfers playing on the 2nd hole. 2 to minimize the number of golf balls hit into the pond immediately behind the existing fence. Changes in technology, in both golf clubs and balls, have substantially increased the number of golfers able to clear our existing fence. The Mendakota staff estimates that ~300 dozen range balls this year have cleared the existing fence and have been lost in the pond. The club has received several reports from members of driving range golf balls landing on the 2nd hole green. This is certainly a problem and Mendakota strongly feels it needs to find and implement a solution this year. Mendakota has considered a number of options. We have reviewed the entire site plan and have determined that there is no other site on the property that could accommodate a driving range. The current range is oriented in an East-‐West direction with the tee area on the West end and the existing fence on the East end. We cannot expand the range to the West as it would infringe upon our parking lot – a lot that is barely adequate to handle the demand on busy summer days. To the East, there is only ~15 yds of expansion space left before we would infringe upon the native areas surrounding the pond on the 2nd hole. Even with the plan to gain those ~15 yds by moving the proposed fence further East, we would still need a substantially higher fence to achieve our ball capture objective. page 25 Mendakota has performed some detailed mathematical analysis that indicates a 25 ft high fence in the proposed location will capture 98+% of the balls hit on the driving range. In addition, Mendakota will implement a few policy changes, including range restrictions on the forward tee area, to handle the remaining. To support our request, I am attaching a number of aerial and ground photos that show the existing and proposed fence from several different perspectives. I am also attaching photos from Indian Hills Golf Club in Stillwater, MN, who was faced with a similar issue and has installed a similar sized fence to the one we are proposing. We believe that granting our request will not detract from the visual appeal of this existing landscape. Mendakota would like to install the new fence in mid October as the current golf season winds down. Bob McKinney, our club superintendent, and Steve Watson, our General Manager, will serve as the key contacts at Mendakota for additional information. I ask for your assistance in getting this item on the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, September 25, 2012 at 7 PM. Sincerely, Tim Milner Past President & Board Member Mendakota Country Club page 26 Aerial View of Mendakota Driving Range and Neighbors -‐ Proposed Changes in Yellow (Dimensions) page 27 Diagram with Carry Distances from Existing Tee to Current/Proposed Fence Fence Height Calculations (with references). A negative number means the ball did NOT clear fence. page 28 View from East from existing tee (Existing Fence in Background) View to West from Existing Fence page 29 View to South from Existing Fence Line Showing Berm, Wetlands, Pond and 2nd Hole View to North From Mendakota Park Parking Lot page 30 View to North/East from nearest neighbor at 849 MENDAKOTA COURT Alternate View to North/East from nearest neighbor at 849 MENDAKOTA COURT page 31 Indian Hills Golf Club in Stillwater – Similar Style 25 ft net – from Fence Line (note: Mendakota would use Steel, not Wooden Poles) Indian Hills Golf Club in Stillwater – Similar Style 25 ft net – Visibility From Tee Area (note that the fence/net is not visible, just the poles) page 32 Dakota County, MN Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Map Scale 1 inch = 405 feet page 33 page 34 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Lorri Smith, City Clerk SUBJECT: Approval of Massage Therapist License for Laura Duncan INTRODUCTION Pursuant to Mendota Heights City Code 3-6-2: No person shall provide massage services or engage in the business of operating an enterprise defined in section 3-6-1 of this chapter, either exclusively, or in connection with any other city business enterprise, without first obtaining a license issued by the city. A therapeutic massage enterprise must meet all of the requirements of chapter 12 of this code. An applicant having an establishment within the city must apply for a license for the premises. Each individual who provides massage must obtain an individual license. DISCUSSION Laura Duncan, 2750 Apache Road, North St. Paul, MN , and working at Massage Elements, has submitted the required application, license fee and investigation fee for a massage therapist license as required per City Code. The Mendota Heights Police Department has successfully completed the background investigation and approves of the issuance of the license. ACTION REQUIRED Staff recommends the approval of a Massage Therapist license for Laura Duncan, 2750 Apache Road, North St. Paul, MN, to be working at Massage Elements for the period of October 3, 2012 through June 30, 2013. page 35 page 36 page 37 page 38 page 39 page 40 page 41 page 42 page 43 page 44 page 45 page 46 page 47 page 48 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Ryan Ruzek, PE, Assistant City Engineer Michael Albers, PE, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Assessment Hearing for Marie Avenue Rehabilitation BACKGROUND Staff identified the Marie Avenue Rehabilitation as a 2012 street rehabilitation project in the 2011-2015 Street Improvement Plan (SIP). Council ordered the Marie Avenue Rehabilitation improvements at their October 18, 2011 meeting, and directed staff to prepare plans and specifications for this street rehabilitation project. The Public Hearing for the consideration of special assessments for the Marie Avenue Rehabilitation project was advertised for the city council meeting at 7:00 P.M. The project has been substantially completed with only street striping and miscellaneous punch list items remaining. Marie Avenue Rehabilitation Project Summary The project included rehabilitating Marie Avenue from Dodd Road to Delaware Avenue. Street rehabilitation included reclaiming the existing bituminous roadway and the placing of a 3” bituminous base course and a 2” bituminous wear course over the reclaimed pavement material. Water main improvements included installing new 8” ductile iron pipe along Marie Avenue and replacing the hydrants to meet SPRWS standards. Storm sewer improvements included constructing a detention pond at the Northeast corner of Marie Avenue and Dodd Road. Improvements to the Marie Avenue trail included removing the exiting bituminous surface and placing a 2.5” bituminous pavement constructed over the existing aggregate base and installing pedestrian curb ramps. Damaged concrete curb and gutter was replaced as part of the roadway restoration. page 49 BUDGET IMPACT The total construction cost for the Marie Avenue Rehabilitation is $1,018,047.56, not including signage replacement and indirect costs for legal, engineering, administration, and finance. The amount to be assessed is $108,800.00. A feasibility report for the project was presented to the city council in August of 2011. A copy of the final assessment roll is attached to this memo. Assessments are shown in the tables below. ASSESSMENT TYPE ASSESSABLE UNITS UNIT ASSESSMENT PER FEASIBILITY REPORT ACTUAL UNIT ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT STREET REHABILITATION: MARIE AVENUE 34 $3,200.00 $3,200.00 $108,800.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that council conduct the required Public Hearing and adopt the attached assessment roll as prepared, or amend them if council deems it appropriate to do so. Conduct the required Public Hearing and then if city council wishes to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE MARIE AVENUE REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201107). This action requires a simple majority vote. page 50 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE MARIE AVENUE REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201107) WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Mendota Heights City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement to Marie Avenue from Dodd Road to Delaware Avenue. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1. Such proposed assessments, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments shall be the annual principal plus interest calculated from the public hearing date to the end of this year plus twelve months of the next year and shall bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. The property owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Finance Director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, excepting the installment portion appearing upon the current year’s property tax statement. 4. The City Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment rolls with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October, 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST _________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 51 CI T Y O F M E N D O T A H E I G H T S - A S S E S S M E N T R O L L Jo b # 2 0 1 1 0 7 St r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n = 1 0 Y e a r s IN T E R E S T R A T E = 6 % Ma r i e A v e n u e S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 0 2 4 0 0 - 79 - 0 6 0 Ve r n & R o s e H i l d e b r a n d t 17 8 3 D e l a w a r e A v e n u e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 9 06 0 7 9 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Se c t i o n 2 4 T w n 2 8 R a n g e 2 3 P t o f S E 1 / 4 of S E 1 / 4 o f S E 1 / 4 c o m a t S E c o r N 1 9 8 f t W 3 3 0 f t S 1 9 8 f t E 3 3 0 f t t o b e g e x S 4 0 f t fo r s t s u b j t o p a r c e l 8 D a k o t a C o u n t y r / w ma p 3 5 2 27 - 0 2 4 0 0 - 79 - 0 7 1 Ke r r y L . & L i s a A . K e r n 53 1 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 2 07 1 7 9 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Se c t i o n 2 4 T w n 2 8 R a n g e 2 3 E 1 / 2 o f W 1/ 2 o f S 1 / 2 o f S E 1 / 4 o f S E 1 / 4 o f S E 1 / 4 su b j t o e s m n t o v e r S 4 0 f t 27 - 0 2 4 0 0 - 79 - 0 7 2 Mi c h a e l K r a j n i a k 80 9 7 K l i e n L a n e W . Ar k a n s a w , W I 5 4 7 2 1 07 2 7 9 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Se c t i o n 2 4 T w n 2 8 R a n g e 2 3 W 1 / 2 o f W 1/ 2 o f S 1 / 2 o f S E 1 / 4 o f S E 1 / 4 o f S E 1 / 4 su b j t o e s m n t o v e r S 4 0 f t 27 - 1 5 1 0 0 - 02 - 0 5 0 Ja m e s R . & B a r b a r a I . K a s a l 56 5 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 05 0 0 2 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 5 B - 2 B r e c k e n r i d g e E s t a t e s 27 - 2 8 8 0 0 - 01 - 0 1 0 Cy n t h i a J . N i p p 71 0 M a r i e A v e n u e W . Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 5 01 0 0 1 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 1 B - 1 E x W 3 0 f t t o V i l l G a n g l 1 s t A d d i t i o n 27 - 2 8 8 0 0 - 01 - 0 2 0 Pl a c i d o & G l o r i a M e n d e z 70 0 M a r i e A v e n u e W . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 5 02 0 0 1 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 2 B - 1 G a n g l 1 s t A d d i t i o n 27 - 2 8 8 0 0 - 01 - 0 3 0 Je f f r e y A . R e e d 68 8 M a r i e A v e n u e W . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 5 03 0 0 1 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 3 B - 1 G a n g l 1 s t A d d i t i o n Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 o f 6 Fi n a l Ma r i e A v e n u e page 52 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 2 0 Ci t y o f M e n d o t a H e i g h t s 11 0 1 V i c t o r i a C u r v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 02 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Lo t 2 s u b j t o r d e s m n t W i l l o w S p r i n g Ad d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 3 1 Pa t r i c i a A . R u s h 67 9 M a r i e A v e n u e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 03 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Lo t 3 s u b j t o e s m n t W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 4 0 La w r e n c e C . & P a m e l a G o f f 67 5 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 04 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 4 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 5 1 Do r i s A n n B i s c i g l i a 66 3 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 05 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 5 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 6 0 Ke n n e t h L . & N a n c y E . P a u l s e n 65 3 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 06 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 6 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 7 0 Ro b e r t O . & B a r b a r a M . K n u t s o n 64 9 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 07 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 7 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 8 0 Na t h a n P . & E l i z a b e t h B r e n n e n 64 7 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 08 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 8 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 0 9 0 Du a n e R . & B o n n i e J . R o c k e 64 5 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 09 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 9 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 1 0 Ve r n o n C . & B r i g i t t e E d s t r o m 63 7 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 11 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 1 1 W i l l o w S p r i n g s A d d i t i o n Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 o f 6 Fi n a l Ma r i e A v e n u e page 53 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 2 0 Ja n e E . V o g e l & C h r i s t o p h e r P h i l l i p s 62 5 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 12 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 1 2 W i l l o w S p r i n g s A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 3 0 Ge r a l d M . F o g e l b e r g 61 5 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 13 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 L- 1 3 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 4 0 Ma r i e W i e g n e r 59 1 M a r i e A v e n u e W e s t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 3 14 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Ex W 1 7 6 f t o f L - 1 4 W i l l o w S p r i n g s A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 4 1 Br i a n A . P e r g a m e n t 20 8 W e s t e r n A v e . N . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 0 2 14 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 W 1 7 6 f t o f L - 1 4 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 5 2 Vi k t o r s U l d i s R o z e n b e r g s & I l z e Ro z e n b e r g s 60 2 M a r i e A v e n u e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 15 2 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 W 1 0 7 f t o f f o l l o w i n g ; p t o f L - 1 5 b e g N W co r E 2 1 8 . 4 4 f t t o N E c o r S 1 3 3 f t S W 22 0 . 3 8 f t t o p t o n W l i n e 1 4 2 f t S o f N W c o r N 1 4 2 f t t o b e g W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 6 1 Th e o d o r e A . & V . H . H u s n i k 62 0 M a r i e A v e n u e W Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 16 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Pt o f L o t 1 6 l y i n g W o f l i n e b e g N l i n e 1 2 5 ft E o f N W c o r S p e r p t o N l i n e t o p t o n S li n e & t h e r e t e r m W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 6 2 Ti m o t h y M . & N a n c y R y a n 61 0 M a r i e A v e n u e W Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 16 2 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Pt o f L o t 1 6 l y i n g E o f l i n e b e g N l i n e 1 2 5 f t E o f N W c o r S p e r p t o N l i n e t o p t o n S l i n e & t h e r e t e r m W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 7 0 Ma r k D . & M a r y c l a r e B a d e 63 2 M a r i e A v e n u e W Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 17 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 / 2 o f L - 1 7 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 3 o f 6 Fi n a l Ma r i e A v e n u e page 54 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 7 1 Ma r v i n & L a v e r n e L e m a y 63 6 M a r i e A v e n u e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 17 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 W 1 / 2 o f L - 1 7 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 8 1 St e p h e n M . N o r t o n 64 0 M a r i e A v e . W . Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 18 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 W 1 0 2 f t o f L o t 1 8 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 8 2 Ma r y T . L a t h r o p 63 8 M a r i e A v e . W . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 18 2 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 Lo t 1 8 e x W 1 0 2 f t o f W i l l o w S p r i n g Ad d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 1 9 0 Je f f e r y S . & M a r y L . H o l l a n d 64 6 M a r i e A v e . W . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 19 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 5 1 . 5 f t o f L - 1 9 W i l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 2 0 0 Ch r i s t o p h e r J . W i l l i a m s 65 2 M a r i e A v e . W . Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 20 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 W 1 0 1 f t o f L - 2 0 W i l l o w S p r i n g s A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 2 0 2 Ta o & K e l l y N g u y e n 64 8 M a r i e A v e . W . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 20 2 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 S 5 0 . 5 f t o f L o t 1 9 & E 1 0 1 f t o f L o t 2 0 Wi l l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 2 1 0 R. S . J o h n s o n & D. M . K a m m e r e r 66 0 M a r i e A v e . W . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 21 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 W 1 / 2 o f L o t 2 1 W il l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 2 1 1 Ro y F . B y e r s & L o r i R . M a x f i e l d 65 6 M a r i e A v e . W . Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 21 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 / 2 o f L - 2 1 o f W il l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 4 o f 6 Fi n a l Ma r i e A v e n u e page 55 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 2 2 0 Je f f r e y L . & P a t r i c i a P l o s s 66 6 M a r i e A v e . W . Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 3 4 22 0 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 E 1 / 2 o f L - 2 2 o f W il l o w S p r i n g A d d i t i o n 27 - 8 4 3 0 0 - 00 - 2 2 1 Pa m e l a A . D o n a h u e 67 2 M a r i e A v e . W . Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 22 1 0 0 $ 3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 $3 , 2 0 0 . 0 0 W 1 / 2 o f L o t 2 2 W il l o w S p r i n g s A d d i t i o n Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 5 o f 6 Fi n a l Ma r i e A v e n u e page 56 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : Nu m b e r o f P r o p e r t i e s : 34 To t a l R e h a b i l i t a t i o n : $1 0 8 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 Gr a n d T o t a l : $1 0 8 , 8 0 0 . 0 0 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 6 o f 6 Fi n a l Ma r i e A v e n u e page 57 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Ryan Ruzek, PE, Assistant City Engineer Michael Albers, PE, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Assessment Hearing for Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation and Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation BACKGROUND Staff identified the Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation as a 2012 street rehabilitation project in the 2011-2015 Street Improvement Plan (SIP). The Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation was also identified as a 2012 street rehabilitation project in the 2011-2015 SIP. Council ordered the Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation Improvements at their October 4, 2011 meeting, and directed staff to prepare plans and specifications for this street rehabilitation project. Council also ordered the Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation Improvements at their October 4, 2011 meeting, and directed staff to prepare plans and specifications. The proposed improvements for these two projects were similar in nature and staff bid the two improvement projects in one plan set. The Public Hearing for the consideration of special assessments for the Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation and Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation projects was advertised for the city council meeting at 7:00 P.M. The project has been completed. Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation Project Summary The project included rehabilitating Mendota Heights Road from Dodd Road to Delaware Avenue. Street rehabilitation included milling 2” of the existing bituminous roadway surface and placing a 2” bituminous overlay. The project also included constructing a 150 feet long right turn lane at the Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road intersection as part of the project. The north side of the road was widened by approximately 6 feet to construct the right turn lane. Improvements to the trail on the south side of Mendota Heights Road included placing a 1.5” bituminous overlay over the existing trail surface and installing pedestrian curb ramps. Damaged concrete curb and gutter was replaced as part of the roadway restoration. page 58 Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation Project Summary The project included rehabilitating Diane Road, Rae Court, Adeline Court, Nina Court, Barbara Court, Douglas Road (east of Victoria Road), Celia Drive, and Eagle Ridge. The improvements for Diane Road (north of Nina Court), Rae Court, Adeline Court, Nina Court, and Celia Drive included street rehabilitation consisting of milling and removing the existing bituminous surface and placing of a 2” bituminous base course and a 1.5” bituminous wear course over the existing aggregate base. The improvements for Diane Road (south of Nina Court), Barbara Court, and Douglas Road (east of Victoria Road) included street rehabilitation consisting of milling a 6-foot wide strip adjacent to the existing curb and gutter and placing a 1.5” bituminous overlay extending over the entire width of the roadway. The improvements for Eagle Ridge included street rehabilitation consisting of reclaiming the existing bituminous roadway and the placing of a 2” bituminous base course and a 1.5” bituminous wear course over the reclaimed pavement material. Damaged concrete curb and gutter was replaced as part of the roadway restoration. BUDGET IMPACT The total construction cost for the Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation and Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation is $1,073,851.80, not including signage replacement and indirect costs for legal, engineering, administration, and finance. The amount to be assessed is $337,104.77. A feasibility report for the project was presented to the city council in August of 2011. A copy of the final assessment rolls are attached to this memo. Assessments are shown in the tables below. Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation – Front Footage Assessment ASSESSABLE PROPERTY FRONT FOOTAGE FRONTAGE ASSESSMENT ($/L.F.) PER FEASIBILITY REPORT ACTUAL FRONTAGE ASSESSMENT ($/L.F.) TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT 701 Mendota Heights Road (ISD 197) 1353.6 $23.48 $15.96 $21,603.46 740 Mendota Heights Road (Lonnquist) *Residential* 197.8 $10.00 $10.00 $1,978.00 Hagstrom King Park (City of Mendota Heights) 677.5 $23.48 $15.96 $10,812.90 Kensington Park (City of Mendota Heights) 455.7 $23.48 $15.96 $7,272.97 $41,667.33 page 59 Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation – Unit Assessment ASSESSMENT TYPE ASSESSABLE UNITS UNIT ASSESSMENT PER FEASIBILITY REPORT ACTUAL UNIT ASSESSMENT TOTAL ASSESSMENT AMOUNT STREET REHABILITATION: DIANE ROAD (NORTH) 55 $3,197.11 $3,197.11 $175,841.05 STREET REHABILITATION: DIANE ROAD (SOUTH) 37 $1,802.45 $1,287.42 $47,634.54 STREET REHABILITATION: EAGLE RIDGE 155 $464.27 $464.27 $71,961.85 Totals $295,437.44 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that council conduct the required Public Hearing and adopt the attached assessment roll as prepared, or amend them if council deems it appropriate to do so. Conduct the required Public Hearing and then if city council wishes to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201110) AND DIANE ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201106). This action requires a simple majority vote. page 60 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS FOR THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS ROAD REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201110) AND DIANE ROAD NEIGHBORHOOD REHABILITATION (PROJECT #201106) WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Mendota Heights City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the improvement to Mendota Heights Road from Dodd Road to Delaware Avenue referred to as the Mendota Heights Road Rehabilitation and Diane Road, Rae Court, Adeline Court, Nina Court, Barbara Court, Douglas Road (east of Victoria Road), Celia Drive and Eagle Ridge Road referred to as the Diane Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1. Such proposed assessments, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual principal installments extending over a period of 10 years. The first of the installments shall be the annual principal plus interest calculated from the public hearing date to the end of this year plus twelve months of the next year and shall bear interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution. The property owner may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Finance Director the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, excepting the installment portion appearing upon the current year’s property tax statement. 4. The City Clerk shall prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessment rolls with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter collect said assessments in the manner provided by law. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October, 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST _________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 61 CI T Y O F M E N D O T A H E I G H T S - A S S E S S M E N T R O L L Jo b # 2 0 1 1 1 0 St r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n = 1 0 Y e a r s IN T E R E S T R A T E = 6 % Me n d o t a H e i g h t s R o a d S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 0 3 6 0 0 - 52 - 0 1 2 In d e p e n d e n t S c h o o l D i s t r i c t # 1 9 7 18 9 7 D e l a w a r e A v e n u e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 01 2 5 2 $ 2 1 , 6 0 3 . 4 6 21 , 6 0 3 . 4 6 Se c t i o n 3 6 T w n 2 8 R a n g e 2 3 p t o f N E 1 / 4 of S W 1 / 4 l y i n g N o f p r o p o s e d M e n d o t a He i g h t s R o a d s u b j t o s t e a s m n t s t o c i t y e x pt p l a t t e d a s K e n s i n g t o n P U D & Br i d g e v i e w S h o r e s 1 s t A d d 27 - 3 1 8 0 0 - 00 - 1 0 0 Ci t y o f M e n d o t a H e i g h t s 11 0 1 V i c t o r i a C u r v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 10 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 8 1 2 . 9 0 10 , 8 1 2 . 9 0 Pa r k H a m p s h i r e E s t a t e s 27 - 4 1 6 0 1 - 00 - 1 0 0 Ci t y o f M e n d o t a H e i g h t s 11 0 1 V i c t o r i a C u r v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 10 0 0 0 $ 7 , 2 7 2 . 9 7 $7 , 2 7 2 . 9 7 Lo t A K e n s i n g t o n P U D 2 n d A d d 27 - 4 8 4 6 0 - 01 - 0 1 0 Cy n t h i a M . L o n n q u i s t 74 0 M e n d o t a H e i g h t s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 2 0 - 1 6 8 0 01 0 0 1 $ 1 , 9 7 8 . 0 0 $1 , 9 7 8 . 0 0 L- 1 B - 1 M e n d o t a W o o d s Nu m b e r o f P r o p e r t i e s : 4 To t a l R e h a b i l i t a t i o n : $4 1 , 6 6 7 . 3 3 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 o f 1 Fi n a l Me n d o t a H e i g h t s R o a d page 62 CI T Y O F M E N D O T A H E I G H T S - A S S E S S M E N T R O L L Jo b # 2 0 1 1 0 6 St r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n = 1 0 Y e a r s IN T E R E S T R A T E = 6 % Di a n e R o a d S t r e e t R e h a b i l i t a t i o n Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 2 0 J. J a m e s T s t e W a l s h Ro s e M . T s t e W a l s h 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 7 02 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 2 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 3 0 W a l t e r & L o i s S . B a u m 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 5 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 7 03 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t N o B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 4 0 Gl e n n C . & J a n e D . T h o r p e 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 4 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 7 04 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 4 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 5 0 J. T h o m a s M a r v e r 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 7 05 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 5 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 6 0 Ma r y J . M i l e y 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 0 06 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 6 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 7 0 W i l l i a m R . & G a y l e S a e k s 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e O n e W e s t C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 0 07 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 7 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 8 0 Br u c e A . & M a r y C . M a d s e n 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e 7 W e s t C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 0 08 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 8 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 63 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 0 9 0 Me i n - K a i & S u s a n T s t H o 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 6 0 09 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 9 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 0 0 El a i n e B a t e s S u t t o n 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 9 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 6 0 10 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 0 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 1 0 Do n a l d J . & S u s a n A . M o c k e n h a u p t 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 6 0 11 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 1 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 2 0 Ri c h a r d A . & C a r o l G . G r a y s o n 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 1 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 6 0 12 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 2 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 3 0 Ba b a r a G . E r i c k s o n 13 7 3 B e l m o n t L n W Ro s e v i l l e , M N 5 5 1 1 3 13 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 3 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 4 0 Gu y W . & E u n i c e I . H o p k i n s 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 3 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 8 14 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 4 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 5 0 De n n i s J . & K a r e n F . B e r t h i a u m e 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 4 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 7 15 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 5 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 6 0 An n e M . M o l i t o r 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 5 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 8 16 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 6 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 64 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 7 0 W . E a r l D a r s t Ja c q u e l i n e A . D a r s t 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 6 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 8 17 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 7 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 8 0 W i l l i a m B . & C l a r e E l d r e d g e 18 0 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 7 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 8 18 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 8 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 1 9 0 Ro b e r t J r . & M a r i a n K n o x 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 7 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 3 19 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 1 9 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 0 0 Ja n e t P . D u c k s o n 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 3 20 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 0 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 1 0 Wa r r e n & C a r o l y n G e r b e r 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 9 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 3 21 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 1 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 2 0 Ro b e r t D . E i b e r t 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 3 22 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 2 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 3 0 Jo h n T y s s e l i n g 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 23 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 3 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 4 0 Fr e d A . J r . K u e p p e r s Su z a n n e L . K u e p p e r s 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 3 24 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 4 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 3 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 65 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 5 0 Pe t e r M . & N a n c y J . O b e r l e 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 25 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 5 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 6 0 Mi c h a e l L . H i x s o n El i z a b e t h R . H i x s o n 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 5 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 26 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 6 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 7 0 Ma r y J o S k a a r 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 4 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 2 27 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 7 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 8 0 Ro b e r t A . & J e a n K . A l b r e c h t 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 2 28 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 8 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 2 9 0 Wi l l i a m T . T r s t e e P r i c e Gr a c e E . T r s t e e P r i c e 34 1 2 A v e n i d a M a d e r a Br a d e n t o n , F L 3 4 2 1 0 - 3 7 1 3 29 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 2 9 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 0 - 02 - 3 0 0 Ma r g a r e t A . L a v i g n e 18 6 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 3 2 30 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 1 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 2 a n d a l l o f L o t 3 0 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 0 Al e x a n d e r P e r e l m a n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e # 1 0 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 5 01 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 1 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 1 Ca r o l S . S t e n b a c k Br a d l e y J . H a d d y 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e E 1 0 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 01 1 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 4 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 66 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 2 Ju l i u s & M a r c i a R o s e n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e E 1 0 3 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 01 2 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 3 Ma r v i n & M i l d r e d P . J a c o b s o n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e E 1 0 4 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 01 3 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 4 Br u c e D a v i d s o n & Sh e l l e y D r i s c o l l 17 5 0 L a n s f o r d L a n e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 0 4 01 4 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 5 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 5 J. R o b e r t & A r l i n e E . S t a s s e n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 1 0 6 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 01 5 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 6 Le o N i e d o r f % M a r k N i e d o r f 44 4 9 G a y w o o d D r i v e Mi n n e t o n k a , M N 5 5 3 4 5 01 6 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 7 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 7 Da l e H . & B e t t y J . A r c a n d 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 1 0 8 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 01 7 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 1 0 8 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 8 Da l l a s A p f e l b a c h e r 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 2 0 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 01 8 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 1 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 1 9 Ed w a r d L a n d s b e r g e r 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 2 E Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 7 01 9 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 5 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 67 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 0 Ev e l y n W . E s r i g 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 2 0 3 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 02 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 1 Sa r a h R . D a n i e l s 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 2 0 4 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 02 1 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 2 He l e n M . Y a r b r o u g h 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 2 0 5 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 02 2 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 5 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 3 Ge r o m e T . T s t e C a u l f i e l d Ka t h l e e n J . T s t e C a u l f i e l d 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 2 0 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 02 3 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 4 El l i o t E f r u m L i b m a n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 2 0 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 02 4 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 7 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 5 Mi c h a e l B r e c k m a n 14 6 3 M a r s h a l l A v e n u e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 0 4 02 5 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 8 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 6 St e p h e n D . K r o v i t z 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 2 0 9 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 02 6 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 2 0 9 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 9 Sa l l y E . O r r e n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 3 0 3 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 02 9 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 0 3 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 6 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 68 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 0 De b o r a h A . S c a t t a r e l l i Ji m m i e L . B r o w n i n g 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 0 4 E Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 8 03 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 0 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 1 Do r i s F . H o l z s c h u h 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 3 0 5 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 03 1 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 0 5 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 2 Re u b e n & E s t h e r K a p l a n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 3 0 6 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 03 2 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 0 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 3 Ba r b a r a A . J o h n s o n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 3 0 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 03 3 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 0 7 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 4 Ca r l A . & D o r o t h y T a m m i n e n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 3 0 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 03 4 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 0 8 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 5 Ja n e t R . G a b o r 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t E 3 0 9 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 8 03 5 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 0 9 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 6 St e p h e n W . T s t e S e i d e l Ri t a L . T s t e S e i d e l 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 03 6 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 1 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 7 Ne i l & B a r b G i t l i n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 2 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 03 7 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 7 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 69 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 8 Ya l e & J e a n T s t e s K a n t e r 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 3 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 4 6 03 8 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 9 Jo s e p h J . & B e v e r l y A . Z a i n e 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 4 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 03 9 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 0 Ja n e l l e B o r g e n & Ch r i s t o p h e r B o r g e n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 5 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 04 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 5 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 1 Mi c h a e l I . N e r e n & Ba r b a r a R . K r o v i t z - N e r e n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 4 6 04 1 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 2 Do n a l d E . & M a r y C . F r i e d l a n d e r 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 7 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 04 2 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 7 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 3 Vi r g i n i a G a r c i a V e l e z 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 1 0 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 4 7 04 3 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 1 0 8 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 4 Ba r b a r a A . B a t e s 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 04 4 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 1 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 5 Lo i s M . W a l d r o n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 2 0 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 04 5 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 8 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 70 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 6 Gl e n n H . K o r f h a g e c/ o G l e n n K o r f h a g e 20 8 A r r o w h e a d D r i v e La k e J a c k s o n , T X 7 7 5 6 6 - 4 5 8 0 04 6 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 7 La r r y J . W i n g e r Su s a n M . S h a n d o r f 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e # 2 0 4 W Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 4 7 04 7 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 8 Ei l e e n C . S p e n c e r 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e # W 2 0 5 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 04 8 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 5 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 9 Sc o t t W e x l e r Da n i e l B . F i e l d 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e # W 2 0 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 04 9 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 0 Me l v i n M . & E v e l y n M . K a m i n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e # W 2 0 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 05 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 7 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 1 No r m a n C o r s o n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e # W 2 0 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 05 1 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 8 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 2 Ro n a l d J . T s t e B u t w i n 87 0 0 W e s t m o r e l a n d L a n e Sa i n t L o u i s P a r k , M N 5 5 4 2 6 - 1 9 3 5 05 2 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 2 0 9 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 3 Vi r g i n i a R . T s t e S t a w a r z 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 05 3 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 1 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 9 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 71 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 4 Jo a n B . D a v i d s o n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 05 4 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 5 Sh e r m a n J . & B e v e r l y K a m i n s k y 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 3 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 05 5 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 6 Ti n a C . M c N a m a r a & Da n i e l G . M o r i a r t y 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 4 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 05 6 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 7 An d r e w M . & T i f f a n y B e r e n b e r g 11 0 2 5 3 8 t h P l a c e N . Pl y m o u t h , M N 5 5 4 4 1 05 7 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 5 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 8 Wi l l i a m R . J r . & C a r o l R e d d i n g 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 6 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 05 8 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 9 Me i n K a i & S u s a n H o 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 05 9 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 7 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 6 0 Sh i r l e n e H . T s t e M a t u s Ri c h a r d N . T s t e M a t u s 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 8 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 06 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 8 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 6 1 Ha r o l d A r e n s o n 18 6 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t W 3 0 9 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 2 06 1 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t W 3 0 9 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 0 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 72 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 1 - 01 - 0 6 2 E. G a r y & M a r i o n G . K l e i n 18 5 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 1 0 E Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 9 06 2 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 2 C I C # 9 T h e Ri d g e S o u t h C o n d o m i n i u m Ap a r t m e n t s U n i t E 3 1 0 27 - 2 2 4 5 3 - 01 - 0 1 0 W a l t e r N . & M a r y J . T r e n e r r y PO B o x 1 8 2 7 7 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 0 2 7 7 01 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 4 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 3 & a l l o f L o t 1 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 4 5 3 - 01 - 0 2 0 Ja n e E . F l a d 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 3 02 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 4 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 3 & a l l o f L o t 2 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 4 5 3 - 02 - 0 1 0 Sa n d r a L y n n J o h n s o n 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 01 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 4 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 3 & a l l o f L o t 1 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 3 - 02 - 0 2 0 Ri c h a r d W . & T h o m a s A . T o n g e n Ma r y V . & W i l l i a m O . T o n g e n 18 S u m m i t R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 2 7 02 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 4 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 3 & a l l o f L o t 2 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 3 - 02 - 0 3 0 Jo h n W . J r . & M a r y E . F i s h b a c h 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 5 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 3 03 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 4 i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a k n o w n as L o t 1 B l k 3 & a l l o f L o t 3 B l k 2 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 01 - 0 1 0 El l i o t t & N a n c y K a r a s o v 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 5 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 1 01 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 1 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 01 - 0 2 0 Ly n n C . L i b e r m a n 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 4 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 02 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 2 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 1 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 73 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 01 - 0 3 0 Ri c h a r d J . & S u e A . W y n n e 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 3 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 1 03 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 3 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 01 - 0 4 0 El i z a b e t h F i n n K r i s t e n s e n 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 2 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 1 04 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 4 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 02 - 0 1 0 El a i n e O . F e s l e r 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 1 01 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 1 B l k 2 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 02 - 0 2 0 Do n a l d & L o r r a i n e J o b e 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 5 4 02 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 2 B l k 2 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 02 - 0 3 0 Ti m o t h y J . B r a y 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 9 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 03 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 3 B l k 2 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 02 - 0 4 0 Sa n d r a M u r p h y 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 04 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 4 B l k 2 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 02 - 0 5 0 Er i n E . O l e a r y 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 05 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 5 B l k 2 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 4 - 02 - 0 6 0 Pe t e r & S a r a B e a g a n 18 7 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 6 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 1 06 0 0 2 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 5 L o t 6 B l k 2 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t 1 B l k 3 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 1 Mi c h e l l e S h e e h y 62 3 H e i m e l D r i v e Ro s e v i l l e , M N 5 5 1 1 3 10 1 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 1 1 . 9 9 6 4 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 2 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 74 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 2 Al i c e C . B o l a n d 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 0 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 10 2 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 2 2 . 1 7 1 3 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 3 Jo h n H . & L o i s E . T s t e M c L e a n c/ o L o i s E . M c L e a n T s t e 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 0 3 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 10 3 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 3 2 . 5 7 1 9 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 4 W a l l a c e J . M c C a r t h y 11 6 2 L e x i n g t o n R i d g e C o u r t Ea g a n , M N 5 5 1 2 1 10 4 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 4 2 . 3 8 9 5 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 5 Ha r o l d I . & B e t t y M . Z a t s 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 0 5 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 10 5 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 5 2 . 0 5 9 2 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 6 Ch a r l e s J . T s t e M c C a r t h y 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 0 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 10 6 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 6 2 . 0 5 9 2 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 7 Do r i s M . T s t e M u e h l e g g e r 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 0 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 10 7 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 7 2 . 8 1 5 8 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 8 Na n c y M . T s t e S k a d r o n 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 0 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 10 8 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 8 2 . 4 5 6 0 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 0 9 Jo h n J . & J e a n e t t e M . M o r g a n 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 0 9 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 10 9 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 0 9 2 . 0 4 0 8 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 3 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 75 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 1 0 Gr e g o r y W o e s s n e r Ma r i l y n W o e s s n e r 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 1 0 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 11 0 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 1 0 3 . 1 0 9 1 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 1 1 Bu r n i e c e G o l d e t s k y 10 9 6 0 N o r t h S k y S q . Cu p e r t i n o , C A 9 5 0 1 4 11 1 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 1 1 1 . 8 1 1 5 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 1 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 1 1 2 St u a r t H . S t e i n m a n El a i n e R . S t e i n m a n 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 0 1 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 11 2 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 1 0 1 2 3 . 5 3 0 6 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 1 Et h e l M . I k e d a 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 0 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 20 1 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 1 1 . 9 9 1 4 % i n t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 2 Da v i d L & D o n n a M . A n t o n s o n 18 3 0 6 4 5 0 S t i l l w a t e r B l v d . N . St . P a u l , M N 5 5 1 2 8 20 2 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 2 2 . 0 3 4 % i n t f i l e #6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 3 Je r o m e B . & Y e t t a S i m o n 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 0 3 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 20 3 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 3 2 . 5 6 3 2 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 4 Ge r a l d F . & S a r a h P . S p i e s s 32 4 6 W e l l S t r e e t Hi n k l e y , M N 5 5 0 3 7 20 4 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 4 2 . 4 0 5 5 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 4 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 5 Ra e W . L e v i n e 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e A p t 2 0 0 5 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 20 5 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 5 2 . 0 5 9 2 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 4 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 76 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 6 Ma r y l o u F l e m m i n g M c L e v i s h 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 0 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 20 6 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 6 2 . 0 5 7 9 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 7 Jo y L . D a l y 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 0 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 0 20 7 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 7 2 . 8 4 6 7 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 8 Ro b e r t J . & E i l e e n C . H o w a r d 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 0 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 20 8 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 8 2 . 4 6 4 7 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 0 9 Ev e r e t t H . T s t e K a r o n No r e n e S . T s t e K a r o n 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 0 9 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 20 9 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 0 9 2 . 9 1 2 0 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 1 0 Ma r r y A n n S u d e i t h T s t e Ru s s e l l J . S u d e i t h J r . T s t e 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 1 0 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 2 21 0 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 1 0 3 . 1 1 4 1 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 1 1 Al o i s J . & F l o r e n c e H . S t i f t e r 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 1 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 2 21 1 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 1 1 1 . 8 1 1 5 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 2 1 2 Rh o d a M a i n s Do n a l d M a i n s 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 0 1 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 21 2 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 2 0 1 2 3 . 5 5 0 3 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 1 Ma r y A l i c e B r a d y 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 0 0 1 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 30 1 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 1 1 . 9 9 5 1 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 5 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 77 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 2 Jo a n L . T r u s t S h a p i r o 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 0 0 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 2 30 2 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 2 2 . 2 0 8 3 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 3 Vi v i a n C . T s t e C a l m e n s o n Ja n e t S . T s t e L e s g o l d 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 0 0 3 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 6 7 30 3 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 3 2 . 5 6 3 2 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 4 Ph i l i p D . F r e e m a n 61 0 5 B a h i a D e l M a r C i r U n i t 6 8 7 Sa i n t P e t e r s b u r g , F L 3 3 7 1 5 30 4 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 4 2 . 4 0 9 2 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 4 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 5 Ka r e n & W i l l i a m N . M a r g o l i s 22 1 2 M i l w a u k e e A v e n u e Mi n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 0 4 30 5 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 5 2 . 0 5 5 5 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 5 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 6 Wi l l i a m H . H o f f m a n & Ja c q u e l i n e M . T u r s s o 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 0 0 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 2 30 6 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 6 2 . 0 6 6 6 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 7 El l e n E . T r s t e e M u e l l e r 10 0 1 A r b o r L a k e D r i v e U n i t 1 6 0 2 Na p l e s , F L 3 4 1 1 0 - 7 0 8 2 30 7 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 7 2 . 8 7 5 0 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 7 4 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 8 W i l l i a m O . S k a r 16 2 7 B l a c k h a w k L a k e D r i v e Ea g a n , M N 5 5 1 2 2 30 8 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 8 2 . 4 6 8 3 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 0 9 Ll o y d S . & V i c k i R . S t e r n 18 3 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 0 0 9 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 2 30 9 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 0 9 2 . 9 8 5 9 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 6 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 78 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 4 5 5 - 04 - 3 1 0 Vi r g i n i a E . T s t e R e i n Cl a y t o n G . T s t e R e i n 19 7 0 C h r i s t e n s e n A v e . S t e C W e s t S a i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 31 0 0 4 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o 6 E a g l e P o i n t Co n d o r e s u n i t # 3 0 1 0 9 . 3 8 1 7 % i m t fi l e # 6 4 b e i n g p t o f L o t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e P l a t N o . 6 1 0 4 27 - 2 2 5 0 0 - 01 - 0 1 0 Ma r y J o D o n o h u e 18 1 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 7 01 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e E a s t P l a t 1 L o t 1 B l k 1 & p t i n t e r e s t i n L o t 9 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 0 0 - 01 - 0 2 0 Jo a n F . L e v e y 18 0 8 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 7 02 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e E a s t P l a t 1 L o t 2 B l k 1 & p t i n t e r e s t i n L o t 9 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 0 0 - 01 - 0 3 0 Lo i s M . E i c h i n g e r 18 0 6 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 7 03 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e E a s t P l a t 1 L o t 3 B l k 1 & p t i n t e r e s t i n L o t 9 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 0 0 - 01 - 0 4 0 Ge r a l d F . S c h i l l 18 0 4 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 04 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e E a s t P l a t 1 L o t 4 B l k 1 & p t i n t e r e s t i n L o t 9 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 0 0 - 01 - 0 5 0 Jo h n M . & G e o r g e a n e E . G l a s g o w 18 0 2 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 05 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e E a s t P l a t 1 L o t 5 B l k 1 & p t i n t e r e s t i n L o t 9 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 0 0 - 01 - 0 6 0 Ro b e r t L . & G r a c e W o l f e 18 0 0 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 7 06 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e E a s t P l a t 1 L o t 6 B l k 1 & p t i n t e r e s t i n L o t 9 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 1 0 Di a n n e E . & R o b e r t A . A r n o l d 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 1 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 2 01 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 1 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 1 B l k 1 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 7 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 79 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 2 0 Da v i d L . & J e s s i c a L . Z e h a v i 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 2 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 02 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 2 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w n a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 2 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 3 0 W i l l i a m M . K r e n s c h n a b e l 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 3 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 7 0 03 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 3 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w n a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 3 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 4 0 Ma r c i a L e e T a p l e 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 4 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 7 0 04 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 4 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w n a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 4 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 5 0 Ri c h a r d B . T s t e & R o s s y T s t e S h a l l e r 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 5 Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 1 2 05 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 5 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w n a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 5 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 6 0 Ga y l e J . & T h o m a s R . M i e l s 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 6 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 7 0 06 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 6 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w n a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 6 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 7 0 Ro b e r t A . J r . & M a r y L . C a s p e r 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 7 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 7 0 07 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 7 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w n a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 7 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 0 - 01 - 0 8 0 Je a n M . W e s t 18 3 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e U n i t 8 Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 7 0 08 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t L o t 8 B l k 1 & in t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a kn o w n a s L o t s 9 & 1 0 B l k 1 L o t 8 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 0 2 1 Ia n E . & P a m e l a S . D o l b y 18 3 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 02 1 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t s 1 & 2 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t at t r i b u t a b l e t o c o m m o n a r e a b e i n g Lo t 5 B l k 1 E a g l e R i d g e S u m m i t To w n h o m e s Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 8 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 80 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 0 3 0 St e p h e n E . & V i c t o r i a O r m e 18 3 7 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 03 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t 3 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 0 4 0 Sh i r l e y E . H u s k i n s 18 4 1 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 04 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t 4 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 0 5 0 W a y n e & J a n e t B e l i s l e 18 4 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 05 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t 5 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 0 6 0 Le o & S a r a n n R . S l a t t e r y 18 4 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 06 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t 6 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 0 7 0 Da v i d & L i n d a O v a d i a 18 4 7 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 07 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t 7 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 1 2 0 Ja m e s B e l l o m o 18 5 7 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 12 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t 1 2 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s 27 - 2 2 5 5 1 - 01 - 1 3 0 Be v e r l y K i e f f e r 18 5 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 13 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t 2 n d A d d i t i o n Lo t 1 3 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s 27 - 2 2 5 5 5 - 01 - 0 1 0 Ma r y T s t e D e s r o c h e s 18 4 9 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 01 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s L o t 1 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 5 - 01 - 0 2 0 St e v e n P . & E l i z a b e t h B e n g t s o n 18 5 1 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 02 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s L o t 2 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 1 9 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 81 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 2 2 5 5 5 - 01 - 0 3 0 Ha r v e y S . & S h a r o n R . D e f r e n 18 5 3 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 03 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s L o t 3 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 27 - 2 2 5 5 5 - 01 - 0 4 0 Pe t e r A . & B a r b a r a A . R e d p a t h 18 5 5 E a g l e R i d g e D r i v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 2 0 8 04 0 0 1 $ 4 6 4 . 2 7 $4 6 4 . 2 7 Ea g l e R i d g e S u m m i t T o w n h o m e s L o t 4 B l k 1 & i n t e r e s t a t t r i b u t a b l e t o co m m o n a r e a b e i n g L o t 5 B l k 1 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 00 - 0 1 0 Ci t y o f M e n d o t a H e i g h t s 11 0 1 V i c t o r i a C u r v e Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 1 6 7 01 0 0 0 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e O u t l o t A 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 01 - 0 1 0 Ch a n g S e o n g H o n g Su n K y e o n g Y u 16 4 5 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 01 0 0 1 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 B l k 1 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 01 - 0 2 0 Da n i e l I . J o h n s o n & S t a c y D o n o v 16 5 5 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 02 0 0 1 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 B l k 1 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 01 - 0 3 0 Ja y A . & D e b o r a h A . M o r g e n 16 6 3 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 03 0 0 1 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 3 B l k 1 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 01 - 0 4 0 Vi c k i L . P e t e r s o n Ma t t h e w S . P e t e r s o n 16 6 9 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 04 0 0 1 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 4 B l k 1 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 01 - 0 5 0 Na u m & M a r i n a L i b e r m a n 16 7 9 C e l i a R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 0 4 05 0 0 1 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 5 B l k 1 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 0 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 82 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 1 0 Ke v i n J . & B e v e r l y E . B o h r e r 16 9 6 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 01 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 2 0 Al l e n & B e t h S h a w 16 9 0 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 02 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 3 0 Da v i d T . & Y v e t t e Q . M u l l e n 16 8 4 C e l i a R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 5 03 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 3 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 4 0 No r m a n L . & B a r b a r a J . G l e w w e 16 8 0 C e l i a R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 5 04 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 4 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 5 0 I. S c o t t J o s e p h Na n c y E . H a m i l t o n 16 7 0 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 5 05 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 5 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 6 0 El i s e C . K i n k e a d 16 6 4 C e l i a R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 5 06 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 6 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 7 0 Ke v i n J . & P a t r i c i a A . M a g u i r e 16 5 6 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 5 07 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 7 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 8 0 Da v i d J . & M a r y C . M i l l e r 16 5 0 C e l i a R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 5 08 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 8 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 1 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 83 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 0 9 0 Co r i n n e M . T s t e S t r a n d 16 4 4 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 09 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 9 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 0 0 Br i a n D . V a r n e r 16 3 8 C e l i a R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 5 10 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 0 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 1 0 Ge r a l d i n e A . T s t e M c Q u i l l a n 16 3 2 C e l i a R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 11 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 1 B l k 2 e x p t t o hw y s u b j t o p a r 1 0 D a k o t a C o R / W ma p N o 1 1 9 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 2 0 Ju l i e R . & R o b e r t O . M a s t 15 9 1 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 12 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 2 B l k 2 e x p t t o Hw y & s u b j t o p a r 9 D a k o t a C o R / W ma p N o 1 1 9 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 3 0 Sa m u e l & R e i n e A . S h i f f m a n 15 9 5 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 13 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 3 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 4 0 Ro b e r t & J a n e t O l s o n 15 9 9 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 14 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 4 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 5 0 Eu g e n e & C a r o l T s t e s B o h m e r t 16 0 5 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 15 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 5 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 6 0 Th o m a s J . K l e i n s c h m i d t 91 9 R a e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 5 5 16 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 6 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 7 0 Br u c e & C a r o l W a g o n e r 92 3 R a e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 5 5 17 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 7 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 2 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 84 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 8 0 Jo h n C . & V i c k i M . G o h l 92 4 R a e C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 18 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 8 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 1 9 0 Jo h n K . & D o n n a B . S a m e l i a n 92 0 R a e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 5 5 19 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 9 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 0 0 Ga r y & B a r b a r a Z u r n 16 3 7 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 8 20 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 0 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 1 0 La w r e n c e & M o n i c a B r e n g m a n 90 9 A d e l i n e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 2 21 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 1 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 2 0 Mi c h a e l & C a n d i c e M a l i n o f f 91 5 A d e l i n e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 2 22 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 2 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 3 0 Ma r y J o R o t h Ku r t M . R o t h 91 9 A d e l i n e C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 23 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 3 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 4 0 Ar n o l d & R a e G . D i v i n e 92 0 A d e l i n e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 2 24 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 4 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 5 0 Ri c h a r d A . & M i c h e l l e Z a r m b i n s k i 91 6 A d e l i n e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 2 25 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 5 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 3 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 85 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 6 0 Ja m e s & D e b o r a h P o v o l n y 91 2 A d e l i n e C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 2 26 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 6 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 02 - 2 7 0 Re n e e B e d r o s 90 8 A d e l i n e C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 2 27 0 0 2 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 7 B l k 2 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 1 0 Jo s e p h A . & A n n C . J a m e s o n 15 9 0 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 01 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 B l k 3 e x p t t o H w y & s u b j t o P a r 8 D a k o t a C o R / W m a p No 1 1 9 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 2 0 Jo y c e L . L o m b a r d o 15 9 8 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 02 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 3 0 Br u c e D . S n y d e r 16 0 0 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 03 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 3 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 4 0 Jo h n F . G r i n a g e r Na n c y J o S h a w 16 0 6 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 6 04 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 4 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 5 0 Ja m e s L . T s t e R o e r i g & D i a n n a E . T s t e Ro e r i g 16 1 4 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 7 05 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 5 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 6 0 Sc o t t F . & N a n c y J . M a r o s e 16 2 0 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 7 06 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 6 B l k 3 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 4 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 86 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 7 0 Th o m a s J . & P h y l l i s J . K u n i k 16 2 6 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 2 7 07 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 7 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 8 0 De n n i s R . & J e a n e t t e B r o w n 16 3 4 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 7 8 08 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 8 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 0 9 0 Mi c h a e l & D a l l o u l C o u r y 16 4 0 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 7 8 09 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 9 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 0 0 Hu g o A . R a m i r e z 16 4 8 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 7 8 10 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 0 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 1 0 Al b e r t L . V o l k e r s 16 5 4 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 7 8 11 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 1 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 2 0 Ri c h a r d S . P a c e 16 6 0 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 1 8 12 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 2 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 3 0 Da k o t a s C h i l d r e n I n c . c/ o D a k o t a C o m m u n i t i e s 68 0 O n e i l l D r i v e Ea g a n , M N 5 5 1 2 1 - 1 5 3 5 13 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 3 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 4 0 Go n z a l o M a r t i n e z Ki m b e r l y A . H u e m o e l l e r 90 5 N i n a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 1 9 14 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 4 B l k 3 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 5 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 87 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 5 0 Mu r r a y M . & L i n d a K i e f f e r 89 7 N i n a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 1 9 15 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 5 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 6 0 Do u g l a s J . & H a n n a h M . H u b e r t y 89 1 N i n a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 1 9 16 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 6 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 7 0 Sh e l l e y P e i l e n 88 5 N i n a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 1 9 17 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 7 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 8 0 Da v i d F . & S a n d r a L . S t r a f e l d a 88 8 N i n a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 18 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 8 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 1 9 0 Le e J . & B a r b a r a J . L e v i t a n 89 4 N i n a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 1 9 19 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 1 9 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 2 0 0 Jo n a t h a n D . & N a t a l i e W a g n e r 90 0 N i n a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 20 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 0 B l k 3 27 - 7 1 2 7 5 - 03 - 2 1 0 Ry a n C . B u r n s Su s a n C . B u r n s 90 6 N i n a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 21 0 0 3 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 So u t h R i d g e L o t 2 1 B l k 3 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 00 - 0 2 0 Ci t y o f M e n d o t a H e i g h t s 11 0 1 V i c t o r i a C u r v e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 4 1 6 7 02 0 0 0 $ 3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 $3 , 1 9 7 . 1 1 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n O u t l o t B Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 6 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 88 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 01 - 0 1 0 Ki m b e r l y A . G e g n e r 93 0 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 1 01 0 0 1 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 1 Bl k 1 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 01 - 0 2 0 Ja m e s A . & J e n n i f e r A . W e i c h e r t 92 2 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 1 02 0 0 1 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 2 Bl k 1 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 01 - 0 3 0 Th o m a s E . & K a t h r y n R . V u k o d i n o v i c h 91 4 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 1 03 0 0 1 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 3 Bl k 1 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 01 - 0 4 0 Th o m a s E . & K a t h r y n V u k o d i n o v i c h 91 4 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 1 04 0 0 1 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 4 Bl k 1 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 1 0 Le o n a r d W . & C a r o l e L e v i n e 90 6 B a r b a r a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 01 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 1 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 2 0 St e w a r t J . & T i f f a n y H a f i z 89 8 B a r b a r a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 02 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 2 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 3 0 Pe t e r A . & C h r i s t i n e G a r r e t s o n 89 0 B a r b a r a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 03 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 3 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 4 0 Pe t e r A . G a r r e t s o n Ch r i s t i n e E . G a r r e t s o n 89 0 B a r b a r a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 04 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 4 Bl k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 7 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 89 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 5 0 Pe t e r L . & D o n n a D . M c C a r t h y 87 6 B a r b a r a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 05 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 5 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 6 0 Ja c k A . & A n d r e a S i l v e r m a n 88 1 B a r b a r a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 06 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 6 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 7 0 Ja m e s I . & J u d y L y n n B e r g 88 9 B a r b a r a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 07 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 7 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 8 0 Wi l l i a m F . & J u l i e A . S c h w i e t z 89 5 B a r b a r a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 08 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 8 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 0 9 0 Ro b e r t N . S c h w a y 90 1 B a r b a r a C o u r t Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 09 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 9 Bl k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 0 0 Ch a r l e s T . J r . T a y l o r 90 7 B a r b a r a C o u r t Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 6 10 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 10 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 1 0 Th o m a s B . & S u s a n J . S c h w a y 90 8 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 1 11 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 11 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 2 0 Th o m a s D . & M a u r e e n M . K e e l e y 90 0 D o u g l a s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 1 12 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 12 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 3 0 Sa l l y M a e L o r b e r b a u m 89 0 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 8 8 13 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 13 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 8 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 90 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 4 0 Er i c M . & K a r l a S . R a p p 88 4 D o u g l a s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 8 8 14 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 14 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 5 0 Ro n a l d J . R y a n 11 0 0 M e n d o t a H e i g h t s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 2 0 - 1 2 2 4 15 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 15 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 7 0 St e v e n R . & B a r b a r a J . R u t z i c k 87 6 D o u g l a s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 8 8 17 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 17 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 8 0 Ra y n a E l l e n S t u r m e r 88 3 D o u g l a s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 8 9 18 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 18 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 1 9 0 Th o m a s J . K l a s 49 6 M o n t r o s e L a n e Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 6 19 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 19 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 0 0 W i l l i a m H . T s t e M a d d e n 90 4 H i g h v i e w C i r c l e N o r t h Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 8 7 20 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 20 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 1 0 Ma r k R . & K r i s t i n W . G l e e m a n 90 3 D o u g l a s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 2 21 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 21 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 2 0 D. C h a r l e s & K a t h y A . E h l e r s 17 5 1 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 4 7 22 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 22 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 3 0 Ma r y M . S o t a - N g o 17 5 9 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 5 23 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 23 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 2 9 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 91 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 4 0 Ru s s e l l B . & V i c t o r i a O e h r l e i n 17 6 7 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 5 24 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 24 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 5 0 Be t h F . P e a r l m a n 17 7 3 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 5 25 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 25 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 6 0 Ri c h a r d L . & C h e r y l L . O c o n n o r 17 7 7 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 5 26 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 26 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 7 0 W a l t e r J . I I I M u l l e n Ca r o l M . M u l l e n 17 8 0 D i a n e R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 27 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 27 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 8 0 An n e R a e S a n d e r s o n 17 7 6 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 2 28 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 28 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 2 9 0 St e v e n G . & M a r i e T . M a n k e r 17 7 2 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 2 29 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 29 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 3 0 0 Je r r o l d B a d e r 17 6 6 D i a n e R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 9 2 30 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 30 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 3 1 0 St e v e n I . L o w e n t h a l Ru t h K e l m a n L o w e n t h a l 91 5 D o u g l a s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 7 4 9 31 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 31 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 3 0 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 92 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 3 2 0 St e v e n L . & S t e p h a n i e G r e e n s t e i n 92 3 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 2 32 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 32 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 3 3 0 Ja m e s T s t e L o n e r g a n 93 1 D o u g l a s R o a d Me n d o t a H e i g h t s , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 2 33 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 33 B l k 2 27 - 8 1 9 5 0 - 02 - 3 4 0 St e p h a n B . & N a n c y B . G i l a t s 93 9 D o u g l a s R o a d Sa i n t P a u l , M N 5 5 1 1 8 - 3 6 3 2 34 0 0 2 $ 1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 $1 , 2 8 7 . 4 2 Vi c t o r i a H i g h l a n d s 1 s t A d d i t i o n L o t 34 B l k 2 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 3 1 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 93 Pa r c e l N o : R e p u t e d O w n e r : Su b d i v i s i o n : Re h a b : To t a l : Bl o c k : Lo t : Nu m b e r o f P r o p e r t i e s : 24 7 To t a l R e h a b i l i t a t i o n : $2 9 5 , 4 3 7 . 4 4 Gr a n d T o t a l : $2 9 5 , 4 3 7 . 4 4 Th u r s d a y , S e p t e m b e r 2 7 , 2 0 1 2 Pa g e 3 2 o f 3 2 Fi n a l Di a n e R o a d page 94 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: Ryan Ruzek, PE, Assistant City Engineer Michael Albers, PE, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements BACKGROUND Staff identified the Hunter Lane Neighborhood Improvements as a 2013 street reconstruction project in the 2012-2016 Street Improvement Plan (SIP). The Glenhill Road Neighborhood Rehabilitation was identified as a 2013 street rehabilitation project in the 2012-2016 SIP. Due to the close proximity of these projects to each other, staff proposes to combine these two neighborhood improvements into one project to reduce redundancies and staff time. The combined project will be called the Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements. The preparation of a feasibility report for the Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements which is required to follow the Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 process was authorized by the Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution 2012-33 at the city council meeting held on May 1, 2012. The Statute 429 process is required because the city council intends to assess a portion of the project. The feasibility report for Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements was accepted by the Mendota Heights City Council and called for a Public Hearing on October 2, 2012 by adopting Resolution 2012-70 at the August 21, 2012, city council meeting. The recommendation of the feasibility report was to proceed with this project. This project includes reconstructing the rural sections of Culligan Lane (further referred to as Culligan Lane (East)), Hunter Lane and Orchard Place. This project also includes rehabilitating the urban sections of Culligan Lane (further referred to as Culligan Lane (West)), Glenhill Road, Orchard Circle, and Veronica Lane. Street Reconstruction – Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East) The existing rural street sections for Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East) were constructed in 1975. The roadway width currently varies from 22 feet to 24 feet measured from edge of roadway to edge of roadway. The pavement cross section consists of a 2” bituminous surface over a 6” aggregate base. Sanitary sewer and water main were also installed on these streets in 1975. Concrete curbs and gutters and storm sewers were never installed. page 95 The pavement condition varies along Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East). They are in relatively poor condition, and appear to be near the end of their useful life. These streets no longer meet the minimum design standards and it is no longer cost effective to continue to repair these streets. Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East) require a 7-ton street design to meet the City’s Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy. A street section consisting of a 4” bituminous pavement surface constructed over a 6” aggregate base is recommended. The horizontal alignment of these streets will remain approximately the same. The proposed street width varies from 25 feet to 36 feet wide from face of curb to face of curb, see attached site plan. Storm sewer improvements will consist of adding catch basins and storm sewer pipe and connecting to the existing storm sewer system. St. Paul Regional Water Services (SPRWS) has recommended replacing the existing water main and hydrants on Hunter Lane, Orchard Place and Culligan Lane (East). Street Rehabilitation – Culligan Lane (West), Glenhill Road, and Veronica Lane The existing urban street section for Culligan Lane (West) and Glenhill Road were constructed in 1980. Concrete curbs and gutters were installed on these streets and the roadway width currently measures 30 feet from face of curb to face of curb. These streets have a pavement section consisting of a 2” bituminous surface over a 6” aggregate base. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main were also constructed on these streets in 1980. The existing urban street section for Veronica Lane was constructed in 1976. Concrete curbs and gutters were installed on this street and the roadway width currently measures 30 feet from face of curb to face of curb. This street has a pavement section consisting of a 2” bituminous surface over a 6” aggregate base. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main were also constructed on these streets in 1976. Proposed improvements for Culligan Lane (West), Glenhill Road, and Veronica Lane will include the reclamation of the existing bituminous roadway and the placing of a 2.5” bituminous base course and a 1.5” bituminous wear course over the reclaimed pavement material, curb and gutter repair, and catch basin repair. Street Rehabilitation – Orchard Circle The existing urban street section for Orchard Circle was constructed in 1989. Concrete curb and gutters were installed on this street and the roadway widths currently measure 27 feet from face of curb to face of curb at the intersection of Orchard Circle and Orchard Place; and 33 feet from face of curb to face of curb for the remainder of the cul-de-sac. This street has a pavement cross- section consisting of a 3.5” bituminous surface over a 6” aggregate base. Storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and water main were also constructed on this street 1989. Proposed improvements for Orchard Circle will include milling of a 6-foot wide strip adjacent to the existing curb and gutter and placing a 1.5” bituminous overlay extending over the entire width of the roadway, curb and gutter repair, and catch basin repair. Sanitary Sewer The Veronica Lane Lift Station was originally constructed in 1975. The lift station components are the original equipment and are out of compliance with current standards. The Engineering page 96 Department & Utility Department personnel are concerned about the continued reliability of the 37 year old lift station. At the request of city staff, a team of engineers from Bolton and Menk, Inc. (consulting engineers) inspected the lift station. After inspecting the Veronica Lane Lift Station, the rehabilitation of the Veronica Lane Lift Station is recommended and proposed improvements include leaving the existing structure in-place while replacing the existing top slab and access hatch and replacing the pumps, controls, piping, and electrical components to ensure continued reliability and code compliance. Issues A Neighborhood Informational Meeting was held on September 17, 2012 to provide the property owners an opportunity to discuss the projects in an informal setting prior to the Public Hearing. There are 87 properties in the project area. Approximately thirty-one (31) property owners representing twenty-four (24) properties attended the meeting regarding the proposed project. Staff presented the proposed improvements, project costs, estimated assessments and answered resident’s questions. The property owners asked a variety of questions regarding assessments, proposed street widths, proposed curb types, construction issues, traffic issues, and street drainage issues at the Neighborhood Informational Meeting. A summary of the questions asked at the Neighborhood Informational Meeting is enclosed with this memo. Overall, residents appeared to be in favor of the project but there were differing opinions on street width and curb type. 1. Some property owners along Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East) who were present at the Neighborhood Meeting do not support the addition of curb and gutter in their neighborhood. Generally, comments revolved around maintaining the rural nature of the neighborhood and limiting the proposed width. a. The roadway width currently varies from 22 feet to 24 feet measured from edge of roadway to edge of roadway. The City’s street reconstruction and rehabilitation policy states that an urban street shall be 33 feet wide from face of curb to face of curb, a 7 ton design, and curb and gutter shall be B618 (barrier curb). A copy of the City Street Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Policy is attached to this memo for your reference. b. The proposed street width varies from 25 feet to 36 feet wide from face of curb to face of curb, see attached site plan. Generally, a 30 foot typical section is proposed for Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East) except staff is proposing a 27’ typical section in the Hunter Lane-Orchard Place curve, a 36 foot typical section on Hunter Lane from Victoria Curve to Veronica Lane, and installing bump-outs at the intersections of Veronica Lane, Culligan Lane and Orchard Circle. The bump-outs would consist of a narrowing from the 30 foot typical section to a 25 foot typical section. c. No parking signs will be installed along both sides of the road in all sections of the road that have the 27 foot typical section or less. d. The proposed street width of 30 feet would be wide enough for one car to be parked and still maintain two drivable lanes on the street. Along the 30 foot typical section, parking will be allowed on either side of the street. e. Along the 36 foot typical section, parking lanes will be striped on both sides of the street. page 97 2. The City’s street reconstruction and rehabilitation policy was questioned regarding the City’s standard curb and gutter being B618 (barrier curb) versus allowing the project to be constructed with surmountable curb. o Reasons residents listed surmountable curb as a preferred choice:  Surmountable looks better.  Can park on the lawn.  Safer parking if the car is parked off the street.  Easier access to lawns for lawn mowers.  Can drive on the curb if needed to pass other vehicles such as garbage trucks.  Safer for cyclists if needed to bail out. a. This is an established neighborhood where all homes and driveways are already constructed. The barrier style curb is recommended because it would catch more water runoff and would be consistent with other city streets. Barrier style curb also creates a better path for snow plowing and reduces damages to lawns from plowing activities. Fitting driveways to a surmountable curb when the houses sit lower than the road is tricky and adds to the cost. 3. The City’s street reconstruction and rehabilitation policy was questioned regarding the City’s cost participation if curb and gutter are installed versus the property owners paying 100% of the cost if no curb and gutter is installed. a. When the Somerset Area was reconstructed, we did not install curb and gutter on Coleshire Avenue. Several of the residents have since commented that curb and gutter should have been installed and has created a maintenance issue for the public works staff. In addition, the pavement on Coleshire Avenue is already beginning to fail. The purpose of the Public Hearing is to determine if plans and specifications should be ordered. Details of the project and proposed financing will be presented to the public at the hearing. BUDGET IMPACT The total estimated cost of the project is $2,399,195.96. PROJECT COSTS ITEM CONSTRUCTION INDIRECT* TOTAL Street Reconstruction $822,446.25 $205,611.57 $1,028,057.82 Street Rehabilitation $238,767.50 $59,691.88 $298,459.38 Mill and Overlay $41,115.50 $10,278.88 $51,394.38 Curb Replacement $34,525.00 $8,631.25 $43,156.25 Storm Sewer $199,370.00 $49,842.50 $249,212.50 Water Main $383,132.50 $95,783.13 $478,915.63 Sanitary Sewer $200,000.00 $50,000.00 $250,000.00 Totals $1,919,356.75 $479,839.21 $2,399,195.96 * Includes 25% indirect costs for legal, engineering, administration, and finance. page 98 The Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements are proposed to be financed by special assessments, municipal bonds, and utility funds. Funding sources and amounts are shown below: FUNDING SOURCES ITEM COST ESTIMATE ASSESSMENT MUNICIPAL BONDS UTILITY FUNDS Street Reconstruction $1,028,057.82 $407,100.00 $620,957.82 Street Rehabilitation $298,459.38 $109,500.00 $188,959.38 Mill and Overlay $51,394.38 $20,625.00 $30,769.38 Curb Replacement $43,156.25 $43,156.25 Storm Sewer $249,212.50 $249,212.50 Water Main $478,915.63 $478,915.63 Sanitary Sewer $250,000.00 $250,000.00 Totals $2,399,195.96 $537,225.00 $883,842.83 $978,128.13 Street improvement projects are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners. Pursuant to the City’s Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy adopted by the city council on June 16, 1992, the Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements are proposed to be assessed to the benefiting property owners as follows:  All units with a driveway located on Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East) will be assessed as a street reconstruction per the Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy.  All units with a driveway located on Culligan Lane (West), Glenhill Road, and Veronica Lane will be assessed as a street rehabilitation with pavement replacement per the Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy. o City costs include curb and gutter replacement, sod restoration, and appurtenant work.  All units with a driveway located on Orchard Circle will be assessed as a street rehabilitation with mill and overlay per the Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy. o City costs include curb and gutter replacement, sod restoration, and appurtenant work. The following tables show the estimated unit assessments based on the City policy and proposed unit assessments that are being recommended by staff. ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS - STREET RECONSTRUCTION HUNTER LANE, ORCHARD PLACE, AND CULLIGAN LANE (EAST) Assessable Costs $1,028,057.82 Assessment $514,028.91 Assessable Units 46 Estimated Unit Assessment per City Policy $11,174.54 $514,028.84 50% Proposed Unit Assessment $8,850.00 $407,100.00 40% The estimated unit assessments for this street reconstruction project are higher than a typical street reconstruction project due to the large lot sizes. Staff proposes to assess the benefiting properties $8,850/unit in order to bring the assessment rate closer to previous and future reconstruction project costs. page 99 ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS - STREET REHABILITATION CULLIGAN LANE (WEST), GLENHILL ROAD, AND VERONICA LANE Assessable Costs $298,459.38 Assessment $149,229.69 Assessable Units 30 Estimated Unit Assessment per City Policy $4,974.32 $149,229.60 50% Proposed Unit Assessment $3,650.00 $109,500.00 37% The estimated unit assessments for the street rehabilitation are higher than the rates that staff anticipates for future rehabilitation projects with pavement reclamation due to the anticipated sub-grade correction. Staff proposes to assess the benefiting properties $3,650/unit in order to bring the rate closer to anticipated rehabilitation projects costs. ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS – MILL AND OVERLAY ORCHARD CIRCLE Assessable Costs $51,394.38 Assessment $25,697.19 Assessable Units 11 Estimated Unit Assessment per City Policy $2,336.10 $25,697.10 50% Proposed Unit Assessment $1,875.00 $20,625.00 40% RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the council conduct the Public Hearing and order the improvements, authorizing staff to prepare the plans and specifications for the reconstruction of Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane (East) and the rehabilitation of Culligan Lane (West), Glenhill Road, Orchard Circle, and Veronica Lane. Conduct the public hearing, and then if city council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HUNTER AND ORCHARD NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT #200902). This action requires a four fifths majority vote. page 100 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HUNTER AND ORCHARD NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT #200902) WHEREAS, the city council adopted Resolution 2012-70 on August 21, 2012 setting the date for a public hearing on the proposed improvements to Culligan Lane, Glenhill Road, Hunter Lane, Orchard Circle, Orchard Place and Veronica Lane; and WHEREAS, ten (10) days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing were given and the hearing was held on the 2nd day of October, 2012, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon on the question of the proposed construction of the following described improvements: Street reconstruction improvements consisting of, but not limited to, bituminous milling or removal, bituminous reclamation grading, water main replacement, storm sewer, sanitary sewer lift station rehabilitation, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and appurtenant work to the existing rural street section for Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane. Street rehabilitation improvements consisting of, but not limited to, bituminous milling or removal, bituminous reclamation, catch basin repair, concrete curb and gutter repair, bituminous surfacing and appurtenant work to the existing urban street section for Culligan Lane, Glenhill Road, Orchard Circle, and Veronica Lane. WHEREAS, the proposed assessable area for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and includes those parcels that currently have driveway access on the project. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1. Such improvements are necessary, cost-effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. That the city engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October, 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST _________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 101 1140 1179 1885 1254 1253 1171 1175 1155 1889 1875 1860 1890 1880 1870 1147 1819 1850 1845 1919 1855 1867 1133 1154 1948 1127 1827 1149 1190 19011248 1247 19911949 1840 1831 1242 1120 1954 1835 1199 1187 1936 1942 1200 1122 1206 1205 1117 1941 1140 1921 11451151 1139 1136 1169 1181 1128 1940 1916 1830 1836 1902 1230 1134 1143 1135 1224 1920 1129 1235 1908 1158 1159 1935 1162 1163 1124 1908 1914 1933 LE X I N G T O N A V E HU N T E R L N ORCHARD PL SIBLE Y M E M O R I A L H W Y VICTORIA CUR CULLIGAN LN GL E N H I L L R D ORCHARD CIR KINGSLEY C I R N ORCHARD HL KINGSLEY CIR S PRIVATE ROA D VAIL DR HUNTER CT KINGSLEY CT AVANTI DR MARIE AVE VERONICA LN VICTORIA RD S W C I R C L E C T PRIVA T E R O A D OVERLOOK RD Hunter and OrchardNeighborhood ImprovementsProject Area August 16, 2012 City ofMendotaHeights0400 SCALE IN FEET Legend City Boundary Assessments Reconstruction Assessment Rehabilitation Assessment Mill and Overlay Assessment Improvement Type Street Reconstruction Street Rehabilitation Mill and Overlay page 102 1140 1179 1885 1254 1253 1171 1175 1155 1889 1875 1860 1890 1880 1870 1147 1819 1850 1845 1919 1855 1867 1133 1154 1948 1127 1827 1149 1190 19011248 1247 19911949 1840 1831 1242 1120 1954 1835 11991187 1936 1942 1200 1122 1206 1205 1117 1941 1140 1921 11451151 1139 1136 1169 1181 1128 1940 1916 1830 1836 1902 1230 1134 1143 1135 1224 1920 1129 1235 1908 1158 1159 1935 1162 1163 1124 1908 1914 1933 LE X I N G T O N A V E HU N T E R L N ORCHARD PL SIBLE Y M E M O R I A L H W Y VICTORIA CUR CULLIGAN LN GL E N H I L L R D ORCHARD CIR KINGSLEY C I R N ORCHARD HL VAIL DR KINGSLEY CIR S PRIVATE ROA D AVANTI DR MARIE AVE HUNTER CT KINGSLEY CT VERONICA LN VICTORIA RD S OVERLOOK RD W C I R C L E C T BWANA CT PRIVA T E R O A D Hunter and OrchardNeighborhood ImprovementsSite Plan August 16, 2012 City ofMendotaHeights0400 SCALE IN FEET Legend Proposed Street Width 25' Typical Section 27' Typical Section 30' Typical Section 36' Typical Section Preferred Street Width No Preference 28' 30' 33' page 103 DATE: September 25, 2012 TO: John R. Mazzitello, PE, PMP, Public Works Director/City Engineer FROM: Michael Albers, PE, Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Informational Meeting Summary for Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements BACKGROUND The preparation of a feasibility report for the Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements was authorized by the Mendota Heights City Council by adopting Resolution 2012-33 at the city council meeting held on May 1, 2012. The feasibility report for Hunter and Orchard Neighborhood Improvements was accepted by the Mendota Heights City Council and called for a Public Hearing on October 2, 2012 by adopting Resolution 2012-70 at the August 21, 2012, city council meeting. The recommendation of the feasibility report was to proceed with this project. This project includes reconstructing the rural sections of Culligan Lane (further referred to as Culligan Lane (East)), Hunter Lane and Orchard Place. This project also includes rehabilitating the urban sections of Culligan Lane (further referred to as Culligan Lane (West)), Glenhill Road, Orchard Circle, and Veronica Lane. Issues A Neighborhood Informational Meeting was held on September 17, 2012 to provide the property owners an opportunity to discuss the projects in an informal setting prior to the Public Hearing. There are 87 properties in the project area. Approximately thirty-one (31) property owners representing twenty-four (24) properties attended the meeting regarding the proposed project. City staff in attendance was John Mazzitello, Ryan Ruzek, and Michael Albers. Ryan Ruzek presented the proposed improvements, project costs, estimated assessments and answered resident’s questions. Below is a summary of the questions/comments that the property owners asked at the informational meeting. Assessments: 1. How were the assessments determined? 2. Are houses that have frontage on two streets assessed twice? 3. Will undeveloped parcels be assessed with this project? 4. Can the assessment be deferred? 5. When will I have to start paying for the assessment? 6. How does the municipal bonding work? 7. Are the assessed amounts adjusted after the bids are received? page 104 Construction: 1. How long will the project take? Will it be as long as the Marie Avenue project? 2. Why do you wait a year before placing the final bituminous layer? 3. Why does Marie Avenue get the final bituminous layer put on this year (same year as constructed)? 4. Why is a portion of Orchard Circle being reconstructed at Orchard Place? 5. Will the road be centered in the ROW on Hunter Lane and Orchard Place? 6. Are you reducing the hill on Hunter Lane? 7. What is the 6’ mill on Orchard Circle? 8. What curb and gutter is going to be replaced in the mill and overlay areas? 9. What will happen to on street parking during construction? 10. Will I have access to my driveway during the project? 11. Can some teeth be put into the contract amount maintaining access to driveways during construction? 12. Will landscaping next to the road have to be removed? 13. Are trees going to be removed due to construction? 14. Will there be any issues with mail delivery, removal of mail boxes, or a need for temporary mailboxes? Street Width: 1. What is the existing street width? 2. Why the bump-outs? 3. How do the bump-outs slow down traffic if only at the intersections? 4. Will the proposed street widths with bump-outs change the traffic speeds based on engineering data? 5. The bump-outs are still wider than the existing street, how does that slow drivers down? 6. What happens at the bump-outs in the winter? Will they narrow the intersection more? 7. Is plowing the bump-outs a problem? 8. The intersection of Orchard Place and Lexington Avenue is already too narrow for buses turning with a car at the intersection. Why narrow the intersection to 27’ at Lexington Avenue? 9. The streets are currently too narrow if cars are parked on both sides of the street. 10. What other locations in the city have 28’ wide streets? 11. Would a 28’ wide street reduce traffic speeds? 12. Hunter Lane looks wide from Victoria curve, how will the road look 8’ wider than existing? It is hard to imagine. 13. Will there be no parking signs everywhere like on Wagon Wheel Trail? Curb Type: 1. Are curbs a non-negotiable item for the project? 2. Why is the curb needed? 3. Are street grades/elevations going to change to put in the curb? 4. Will the curb be surmountable? 5. Why do other cities use surmountable curb and we don’t? 6. Barrier curb would be a hazard for cyclists that lose control. 7. Barrier curb still wouldn’t prevent water from spilling the curb. 8. Surmountable curb may work great for the homes at the top of the hill but not at the bottom of the hill at my house which is at the low point. 9. Can a combination of barrier and surmountable curb be put in? page 105 10. What is the width of barrier curb versus surmountable curb? 11. Can the city send out a survey for curb types? 12. Reasons residents listed surmountable curb as a preferred choice: a. Surmountable looks better. b. Can park on the lawn. c. Safer parking if the car is parked off the street. d. Easier access to lawns for lawn mowers. e. Can drive on the curb if needed to pass other vehicles such as garbage trucks. f. Safer for cyclists if needed to bail out. Utilities: 1. Is the City changing the existing drainage patterns? 2. How do the catch basins collect drainage? 3. Will the runoff in the back of 1145 Orchard Place remain in place? 4. Will the culvert at the intersection of Orchard Place and Orchard Circle remain in place? 5. Will the hole near the culvert at the southwest corner of Hunter Lane and Culligan Lane be fixed? 6. Has the freezing water at the intersection of Orchard Place and Lexington Road been addressed? 7. If interested in a rain garden, when should we start discussing rain gardens with city staff? 8. Is new water main being installed? 9. Will water service be disrupted? 10. Would power poles need to be relocated due to the street reconstruction? 11. How far can power poles be from the road or trees? Traffic: 1. Are there speed complaints on Hunter Lane? 2. Can the city place speed monitors on the streets to notify people of their speed? 3. There are bad site distances at Orchard Place and Lexington Avenue. Will the brush be cut back this fall? 4. Any discussion on adding stop signs at the intersections? 5. Any consideration for adding speed bumps? Miscellaneous: 1. What is the process for plan approval? 2. How do we make changes to the plans? 3. What is the best way to give the City feedback or concerns about the project? 4. Who do we contact about concerns? 5. Is our neighborhood Public Hearing going to be the only item on the council agenda? Not happy with waiting 2-3 hours for our project to be discussed. 6. How do we preserve the pastoral feel of the neighborhood? 7. Once the rural feel is gone it is gone forever. 8. People are nervous about change. 9. How will the Olin property connect to Lexington Avenue? 10. The survey the city sent out was incomplete as far as options for the neighborhood. RECOMMENDATION None – For Information Only page 106 CITY OF l\1ENDOTA HEIGHTS STREET REHABILITATION AND RECONSTRUCTION POLICY PURPOSE The City of Mendota Heights Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction policy is intended to provide a plan for maintaining the City's existing streets, and encourage the upgrade of rural streets to urban design. This document sets forth the methods and policies relating to local street improvements and special assessments practiced in the City of Mendota Heights. It is emphasized that the following summary is general in nature and that certain circumstances may justify deviations from stated policy as determined by the Mendota Heights City Council in its discretion. This policy may also be amended from time to time by vote of City Council. SECTION I DEFINITIONS 1. RECONSTRUCTION -will be defmed as a project whereby many or all meaningful elements of an existing street are being removed and replaced. This would include curb and gutter, sidewalks, bituminous or concrete pavement, granular base and items appurtenant to these elements. 2. REHABll..ITATION -will be defmed as a project in which one or more of the aforementioned elements is modified or supplemented in-place, to restore the serviceability of the existing street (i.e. bituminous overlays). 3. PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE -will be defmed as work that involves a level of effort less than that involved in reconstruction or rehabilitation, the extent of which is to extend the life of the existing improvement. Preventive maintenance will include but not be limited to crack filling, patching, and seal coating. 4. RURAL STREET -any street that has no curb and gutter or storm sewer, or does not otherwise meet City design standards for thickness and width. 5. URBAN STREET -a street that has curb and gutter, storm sewer, and is designed to City standards for thickness and width. 1 page 107 SECTIONll GENERAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES The following are general principles, policies and procedures applicable to all types of improvement: 1. Project costs shall include the cost of all necessary construction work required to accomplish the improvement, plus engineering, legal, fmancing, easement acquisition and contingency costs. 2. Assessable costs are project costs minus the City and County share and other credits. MSA funds will not be credited to offset assessments as they will be utilized in a revenue pool fund to offset total reconstruction program costs. 3. Special assessments will be levied as soon as practical. Normally this will be within one year after completion of the project. 4. Publicly owned properties, including but not limited to municipal building sites, schools, parks, County, State and Federal building sites, but not including public streets and alleys, are regarded as being assessable on the same basis as if such property were privately owned. 5. Revenue sources for these types of improvements will be many, including, but not limited to assessments, MSA Funds, infrastructure replacement funds and general tax levies. SECTIONll SPECIFIC POLICIES Project Initiation and Hearine Process This section describes the initiation of improvement projects and the administration required to receive fmal City Council action, pursuant to the requirements of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. A. Project Initiation 1. By Petition: Citizen petitions for initiating improvement will be prepared by City staff upon request. Such petitions circulated by the affected property owners should bear the signatures of the property owners of 51 % or more, of the benefitted property(ies). , . 2 page 108 When projects are initiated through this process the costs of doing engineering feasibility studies and associated project consideration costs will be borne by the property owner(s) so petitioning. If the project proceeds through construction and assessment those costs will be considered project costs under Section n.1 above. If the project does not proceed through construction these costs will be billed back to the property owners petitioning or will be recorded for future project costs consideration at which time the project is concluded. Determination of the method of cost recovery will be made by the City Council. 2. By Council Action~ If the Council determines that an improvement is in the best interest of the City, it can, without petition, initiate the improvement with a four/fIfths vote of the Council. The Engineering Department shall inventory and rate the condition of streets in the City. This rating shall then be used to determine the priority of street improvements in the City's 5 Year Street Improvement Plan. The City will generally improve streets that have the highest priority first. B. Hearing Process 1. Improvement Hearing: After a petition is fIled and its adequacy determined, or the Council initiates the project, the City Engineer is directed to study and report as to the feasibility of the improvement. If after reviewing the feasibility report, the Council feels the project has merit, a public hearing is scheduled, notice published twice, and persons benefitted by the project notified in writing in accordance with applicable State Statutes and City Standards. If after. the improvement hearing, at which all persons are heard, the Council feels that the project still has merit, then the Council will authorize the preparation of necessary plans and specifications, and upon receipt and acceptance of those plans, will authorize the advertisement for bids, by resolution, for the construction of the project. C. Determining Assessment Method to Use 1. Front Footage Assessment -The front footage assessment method will generally be used on all multiple land use projects as per the City's adopted assessment policy. That is, if an improvement project affects parcels that are not zoned similarly the front footage method will generally be used. 3 page 109 2. Unit Assessment -Where a project affects parcels which are all zoned similarly or part of a multi-unit development, the Unit Assessment method may be applied. 3. Area Assessment -Area assessment may be used for storm sewer improvements. This may be necessary for projects where the stonn sewer is installed for reasons other than just elimination of ditches. If necessary or desirable to achieve equitable distribution of assessments, the City Council may adopt alternative methods for calculating assessments consistent with the City's adopted assessment policy. D. Amount of Assessments 1. Rehabilitated Rural Streets -Rural streets that are rehabilitated or are reconstructed as a rural section shall be . fmanced 100% through assessments to the abutting properties. As rural street sections are not considered desirable, no City funding assistance shall be available. 2. Upgraded Rural Streets -It is the City desire to upgrade rural street sections to urban street sections where possible. Therefore when a rural street is scheduled for an improvement, upgrading to urban design will be the objective unless otherwise detennined by the City Council. In making such a determination the City Council may consider a petition from property owners to perpetuate a rural street. The City will fmance up to 50 % of the total project cost through the Infrastructure Replacement Fund for an upgrade project. The affected property owners will be assessed the cost of the storm sewer pipe, the new curb, and a portion of the street reconstruction cost. 3. Rehabilitated Urban Streets -For streets that are urban design, the City shall finance 50 % of rehabilitation costs. 4. Reconstructed Urban Streets -When an urban street is reconstructed all of the reconstruction costs shall be assessed to the abutting property owners. The City will fmance 50 % of that portion of the project that could be classified as rehabilitation (the fmaIlift of blacktop). 5. Preventive Maintenance -The City shall perform routine and regular preventative maintenance to the extent practical on all streets in the City, until such time as the street has aged or deteriorated to the extent that such maintenance is no longer cost effective. 4 page 110 When a street has reached its expected life, in accordance with the City's infrastructure rating system, no additional preventative maintenance shall be performed. The only work performed will be the minimum amount necessary to keep the street reasonably safe for vehicular traffic. All preventative maintenance shall be funded by the City for streets where preventative maintenance is cost effective. On deteriorated streets, no preventative maintenance shall be performed except at the sole expense and request of the adjoining property owners E. Period of Assessments Assessments shall be spread over the life of the project. The expected life of various projects to be used in levying assessments is presented here: Project Type Rural Rehabilitation Rural Reconstruction as Rural Rural Reconstruction as Urban Urban Rehabilitation Urban Reconstruction SECTION IV CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS Minimum Desiz:n Standards 10 years 10 years 20 years 10 years 20 years The following are minimum design standards applied to the design and construction of improvements in the City of Mendota Heights and are for reference to this policy. A. Storm Sewer System Lateral pipe and catch basin size shall be generally be designed to handle a 10 year event and trunk facilities shall generally be designed to handle a 100 year event as determined by the City Engineer. B. Sidewalks, Trails and Bikeways Concrete -5' wide with 6" sand base -4" thick Bituminous -8' wide (2341) Bit. with 6" Class 5, 100 percent crushed rock and 2" Bituminous 5 page 111 All trails and sidewalks will be located 1 0 off property line if at all possible, pedestrian ramps and curb drops will be installed according to MN/DOT Standards. C. Streets Urban streets shall be classified as either local or collector streets. Urban local streets shall normally be 33 feet wide, face to face, and 7 ton design, curb and gutter on local streets shall be B618. Collector streets shall be 9 ton design and shall normally be constructed to Municipal State Aid (MSA) standards. Rural streets are not desirable. Therefore for any rural street reconstruction project the City shall proceed as if the rural street is to be upgraded to urban design. Unless a neighborhood opposes this upgrade, it shall occur. Rural streets that are not upgraded will generally be rehabilitated via an overlay of 1.5"-2" of blacktop. SECTION V ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL POLICY Deferral of Special Assessments A. Purpose -To indicate in certain instances the City may allow deferral of special assessments levied under this policy. B. Conditions of Deferral: Application for deferral of special assessments under these provisions must be fIled within thirty (30) days from the date the assessment roll is adopted. Applications granted shall continue in effect for subsequent years until the property no longer qualifies. Applications shall be filed with the assessor of the taxing district in which the real property is located. C. Situations of Discretionary Deferral: 1. Senior citizen/low income deferral. At its discretion the City may defer assessments against any homestead property owned by a person 65 years of age or older or retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability and for whom it would be a hardship to make the assessment payments. The standards and guidelines governing what constitutes hardship are established by City ordinance or resolution. 6 page 112 Additionally, the City may grant a deferral in situations where its hardships standards and guidelines have not been met if exceptional and unusual circumstances exist and no preference or discriminatory treatment will occur. This deferral is subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 435.193. 2. Unimproved property deferral. The City may also defer the assessments of improvements with respect to property which is not directly and immediately affected by the improvement for which the assessment is levied. If applicable, at such times as extensions or connections regarding the improvement directly benefit such unimproved property, the City may require payment of the deferred assessments as well as those relating to the connection or extension. This deferral is subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 429.051. Any such deferral shall be subject to such other terms and conditions including accrual of interest, and shall be subject to termination, all as determined by City Council. Adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council this 16th day of June 1992. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By:------=-~_ .... _~_~_r _~ __ _ Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: KHE:dfw page 113 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION ORDERING OF IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HUNTER AND ORCHARD NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS (PROJECT #200902) WHEREAS, the city council adopted Resolution 2012-70 on August 21, 2012 setting the date for a public hearing on the proposed improvements to Culligan Lane, Glenhill Road, Hunter Lane, Orchard Circle, Orchard Place and Veronica Lane; and WHEREAS, ten (10) days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing were given and the hearing was held on the 2nd day of October, 2012, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon on the question of the proposed construction of the following described improvements: Street reconstruction improvements consisting of, but not limited to, bituminous milling or removal, bituminous reclamation grading, water main replacement, storm sewer, sanitary sewer lift station rehabilitation, aggregate base, concrete curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and appurtenant work to the existing rural street section for Hunter Lane, Orchard Place, and Culligan Lane. Street rehabilitation improvements consisting of, but not limited to, bituminous milling or removal, bituminous reclamation, catch basin repair, concrete curb and gutter repair, bituminous surfacing and appurtenant work to the existing urban street section for Culligan Lane, Glenhill Road, Orchard Circle, and Veronica Lane. WHEREAS, the proposed assessable area for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota and includes those parcels that currently have driveway access on the project. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council as follows: 1. Such improvements are necessary, cost-effective and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. That the city engineer be and is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for said improvement. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October, 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST _________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 114 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator SUBJECT: Resolution Approving a Conditional Use Permit, Planning Case 2012-29 BACKGROUND Daniel Fleischhaker submitted a planning application requesting a conditional use permit for a garage greater than 1200 square feet. Mr. Fleischhaker also submitted a request for a variance to have more than three garage doors on the proposed expanded garage at 1018 Overlook Road. The property is guided low-density residential, zoned as R-1, and used as a single family home. The planning commission heard this request at their September 24, 2012 meeting. Mr. Grittman reviewed his planning memo which has been attached. The planning commission was supportive of the request for a conditional use permit for the garage expansion, but sought more information on the request for a variance. The applicant showed images of a number of garages in the vicinity of 1018 Overlook Road which had four doors, to support his claim that a four door garage was both a reasonable request, and more aesthetically pleasing than a large garage with three doors. Staff explained that prior to the zoning code review completed in 2011, a garage less 1200 square feet in area was allowed have four doors; during the zoning code review the planning commission and city council decided to make three doors the standard for all garages. The commission sought better definition from the applicant of any unique circumstances and practical difficulties which would justify the variance. The commission decided to separate the requests for conditional use permit and variance for consideration. There were no comments at the public hearing. The commission passed a motion tabling the request for a variance to the October planning commission meeting, and took action on the conditional use permit separately. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION page 115 The planning commission voted to pass a motion recommending approval of the conditional use permit as attached 7:0. This matter requires a simple majority vote by the council. If the city council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GARAGE GREATER THAN 1200 SQUARE FEET AT 1018 OVERLOOK ROAD. page 116 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A GARAGE GREATER THAN 1200 SQUARE FEET AT 1018 OVERLOOK ROAD WHEREAS, Daniel Fleischhaker has applied for a conditional use permit to construct an addition to the existing attached garage, with a total area greater than 1200 square feet at 1018 Overlook Road (PID 27-32800-04-010, Lot 1, Block 4 Highland Heights South) as proposed in planning case 2012- 29; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meeting September 24, 2012. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that a conditional use permit as proposed in planning case 2012-29 is hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed garage meets all zoning requirements for setback and size. 2. With a garage door of no more than 12 feet in width, the applicant would be able to meet the requirements for attached garages of more than 1,200 square feet. 3. The proposed garage is consistent with other single family properties in the area. 4. The proposed garage has been designed to be consistent with the architecture and materials of the principal building. 5. The proposed addition fits on the property without raising issues of overcrowding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that a conditional use permit as proposed in planning case 2012-29 is hereby approved with the following condition: 1. Either the applicant revise his existing conditional use permit request for the construction of a single door garage expansion, or the applicant obtains a variance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ___________________________ Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST ______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 117 MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Michelle Barness / Stephen Grittman DATE: September 19, 2012 MEETING DATE: September 25, 2012 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a garage of more than 1,200 square feet; Variance for two double- garage doors CASE NO: NAC Case: 254.04 -12.18 APPLICANT(S): Daniel Fleischhacker LOCATION: 1018 Overlook Road ZONING: R-1, One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR - Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: Daniel Fleischhacker is seeking a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a two stall garage addition to his existing attached garage at the property located at 1018 Overlook Road. With the garage addition, the total garage space on the property will be approximately 1,470 square feet. The submitted application includes the attached garage addition of about 700 square feet (25 feet x 28 feet). Analysis: Conditional Use Permit. A conditional use permit is required for the construction of an attached garage of more than 1,200 square feet, with a maximum square footage of 1,500 square feet. Because the addition of the requested two stall garage will cause page 118 2 the existing garage on the property to expand to approximately 1,470 square feet, the applicants are requesting a conditional use permit for its construction. The proposed garage addition is designed with two stalls facing west towards Summit Lane, and extending 25 feet north of the existing garage. The applicant has indicated that the exterior materials of the proposed garage will be consistent with the existing garage, including brick finish and an insulated overhead garage door. It is also encouraged that the roof pitch of the proposed garage match the existing garage and principal building to be aesthetically compatible with those structures. With the proposed attached garage addition, the expanded garage will still meet the required 30 feet front and corner side yard setback requirement. In addition, the floor of the expanded garage will remain at least 1½ feet above the street grade at the curb. According to Zoning Ordinance Section 12-1D-3, no more than three garage doors (a double width door, along with a single width garage door, or three single garage doors) are permitted in a residential district. The applicants are proposing the addition of a double wide garage onto their existing double wide garage, which does not meet this requirement. In order to proceed with their request for a conditional use permit for a larger attached garage, the applicants will have to reduce the proposed garage door to a single-width garage door. In review of aerial photography of the neighborhood, it appears that most of the neighbors near the subject property maintain a maximum of only three garage stalls. Just one garage along Overlook was found to have 4 garage doors facing the street. Most of the homes had just two or three garage doors visible, even though many of the homes are large and had larger garages. As such, the proposal to construct the garage with two double garage doors would appear inconsistent with the majority of homes in the area. To pursue the request to construct the building with a second double door, the applicant is seeking a variance from the code standard cited above. Variances are reviewed as to their ability to show unique property attributes that differentiate the property from similarly situated parcels in a way that suggests a departure from the standards would be a reasonable use of the property. When considering variances, the City is required to find that: (1) The applicant is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner; and (2) The applicant’s proposal faces practical difficulties in using the property in this manner due to circumstances that: a. Are unique to the property, b. Are not caused by the applicant, c. Are consistent with the purpose and intent of the City’s plans and ordinances, page 119 3 d. Are not out of character with the locality, or neighborhood, in which the property is located. The applicant has suggested that the oversized (double) lot would be one factor that is unique to the property. However, the intent of the City in adopting the garage door limitation was to minimize the extensive street view of garage doors from the street – lot size would not necessarily relate to this intent. As noted above, several property owners in the immediate area have constructed garages in compliance with the three- garage-door standard. Approving a variance in this case would raise issues of consistent application of the code, and consistency with the neighborhood. Moreover, the uniqueness factor is intended to demonstrate practical difficulties in using the property according to the code. While the double-lot size may be greater than other nearby properties, it does not interfere with meeting the requirements of the code. In any case, because a variance is needed, the proposed double garage door could not be approved with the CUP. Instead, the applicant’s request could proceed only with a condition that the zoning standards are met by the application. To do so, an approval would require a condition that only a single garage door could be constructed under this CUP. With regard to options for the applicant, staff would note that the minimum practical double garage door would be at least 16 feet in width, with some manufacturers offering “double” doors at 14 feet in width. With this observation, a 12 foot wide door would be considered a single door for the purposes of meeting the zoning ordinance requirements. Action Requested: Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission may make one of the following recommendations: A. Conditional Use Permit 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit with conditions based upon a finding that the proposed structure is consistent with the intent of the Conditional Use Permit clause allowing expanded attached garages of between 1,200 and 1,500 square feet. Conditions may include the following: a. The applicant revise his existing conditional use permit request to approval for the construction of a single-door garage expansion, as opposed to a double door. 2. Denial of the Conditional Use Permit based on a finding that the proposed garage would adversely affect surrounding properties; and that the page 120 4 proposed double garage door design cannot proceed without a variance from zoning ordinance standards. B. Variance 1. Approval of the variance to allow two double garage doors as proposed, based on findings that the size of the property established a condition unique to this property that justifies a variance from the zoning standards. 2. Denial of the variance, based on findings attached to this report. Staff Recommendation: While Planning staff is supportive of the conditional use permit to allow an attached accessory structure upon the subject property in the size and location proposed, Staff recommends approval only with the condition that the applicant amend the proposal to meet the requirement for garage door width. As such, Planning staff further recommends denial of the requested variance to construct the garage with a second double garage door. As noted in the report, staff believes that the requisite findings to support a variance are not present with this permit. Supplementary Materials: Application materials page 121 5 Findings of Fact for Approval Attached Garage Conditional Use Permit 1018 Overlook Road The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the above Permit: 1. The proposed garage meets all zoning requirements for setback and size. 2. With a garage door of no more than 12 feet in width, the applicant would be able to meet the requirements for attached garages of more than 1,200 square feet. 3. The proposed detached garage is consistent with other single family properties in the area. 4. The proposed garage has been designed to be consistent with the architecture and materials of the principal building. 5. The proposed addition fits on the property without raising issues of overcrowding. page 122 6 Findings of Fact for Denial Variance to allow two double-garage doors 1018 Overlook Road The following Findings of Fact are made in support of denial of the above Permit: 1. The proposed garage meets all zoning requirements for setback and size. 2. With a garage door of no more than 12 feet in width, the applicant would be able to meet the requirements for attached garages of more than 1,200 square feet. 3. A large majority of neighboring properties with larger garages meet the required garage door standard of no more than three such doors. 4. There do not appear to be conditions on the property that create practical difficulties in meeting the normal zoning standard. 5. Approval for the variance on this property where most neighbors have complied with the code without variance would be inconsistent with the standards applied to the neighborhood. page 123 Highwa y 1 3 Lil a c L a Marie Ave Ja m e s R d Douglas Rd Overlook Rd Su m m i t L a Wa l s h L a Avanti Dr Ce l i a D r Fa r o L a Tw i n C i r c l e D r Vic k i L a Ov e r l o o k L a Ma y f i e l d H e i g h t s R d Ro l l i n g G r e e n C v O x f o r d C t Dou g l a s C t Bwana Ct Wi n d w o o d C t Site Location Map Water/Wetlands Major Roads City Roads parcels Municipal Boundaries Delaware Ave 1018 Overlook Road page 124 page 125 page 126 page 127 page 128 page 129 page 130 Dakota County, MN Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Map Scale 1 inch = 139 feet page 131 DATE: October 2, 2012 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator SUBJECT: Resolutions Approving a Conditional Use Permit, and Denying a Variance, Planning Case 2012-30 BACKGROUND Bob Whebbe submitted a planning application requesting a conditional use permit for a detached garage and a variance for a detached garage greater than 750 square feet in area at 598 Sibley Memorial Highway. The property is guided low-density residential, zoned as R-1, and used as a single family home. The planning commission heard this request at their September 24, 2012 meeting. Mr. Grittman reviewed his planning memo which has been attached. The planning commission was supportive of the request for a conditional use permit for a detached garage, and asked the applicant to provide better definition unique circumstances of the property. The commission also asked the applicant why an attached garage could not be constructed. The applicant stated that attaching the garage to the home would leave no room for a turnaround, requiring the homeowner to back cars into Sibley Memorial Highway. The applicant also stated that the proposed location would create a safe play area for his children. Mr. Whebbe reported that he collects classic cars, and has experienced multiple break-ins to cars that are parked outside. The commission explained to the applicant that they did not feel that any unique conditions existed and encouraged the applicant to consider alternatives to the variance. The commission noted turn-arounds on nearby driveways, and shared that similar requests for variance have been denied. At the public hearing, Jennifer Purtell (564 Hiawatha) asked if the garage would be a single-story structure. Chair Norton confirmed that the application was for a single story garage. Mr. Sedlacek shared correspondence received by staff for the public hearing – Rose Karsten (580 Sibley Memorial Highway) had called City Hall to voice her support for the garage as proposed. Nancy Kane (586 Sibley Memorial Highway) sent a letter to City Hall supporting the conditional use permit, and opposing the variance for a detached garage greater than 750 square feet. BUDGET IMPACT N/A page 132 RECOMMENDATION The planning commission voted to pass a motion recommending denial of the request for a variance. This matter requires a simple majority vote by the council. If the city council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR A DETACHED GARAGE GREATER THAN 750 SQUARE FEET AT 598 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. The planning commission voted to pass a motion recommending approval of the conditional use permit as attached 7:0. This matter requires a simple majority vote by the council. If the city council desires to implement the recommendation, pass a motion adopting A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED GARAGE AT 598 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. page 133 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A DETACHED GARAGE AT 598 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. WHEREAS, Robert Whebbe has applied for a conditional use permit to construct a detached garage at 598 Sibley Memorial Highway (PID 27-17100-01-080, all of lots 7 and 8 Block 1, Cherokee Park Heights) as proposed in planning case 2012-30; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meeting September 24, 2012. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that a conditional use permit as proposed in planning case 2012-30 is hereby approved with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed structure is consistent with the intent of the conditional use permit clause allowing detached garages. 2. The subject property includes adequate area to accommodate a detached garage of the size proposed. 3. The applicant has shown that remodeling of the home, and/or attachment of the garage to the existing garage area is impractical due to the conditions on the property. 4. The applicant has shown that the existing single-car garage space is inadequate, a condition which can be best overcome by the construction of a detached garage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that a conditional use permit as proposed in planning case 2012-30 is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The applicant combines the two parcels of land over which the garage is proposed. 2. The applicant revises his request to meet the 750 square foot maximum floor area. 3. Such plans, drawn to scale shall be modified to specify proposed finish materials, colors and structure height. 4. The garage not exceed 15 feet in height. 5. The applicant coordinate the garage’s roof style and roof pitch with that of the principal building. page 134 Res. 12-54 Page 2 6. The existing attached garage on the site be repurposed as living space as a part of this project, to comply with the maximum allowance of one garage structure on a single family parcel. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ___________________________ Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST ______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 135 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2012- A RESOLUTION DENYING A VARIANCE FOR A DETACHED GARAGE GREATER THAN 750 SQUARE FEET AT 598 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. WHEREAS, Robert Whebbe has applied for a variance to construct a detached garage greater than 750 square feet at 598 Sibley Memorial Highway (PID 27-17100-01-080, all of lots 7 and 8 Block 1, Cherokee Park Heights) as proposed in planning case 2012-30; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter at their regular meeting September 24, 2012. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mendota Heights City Council that a variance as proposed in planning case 2012-30 is hereby denied with the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed detached garage is greater than the maximum square footage allowed for detached garages in this zoning district. 2. The site appears to have adequate room for the expansion of the existing attached garage in compliance with zoning regulations. 3. There do not appear to be any unique characteristics of the property that create practical difficulties in complying with the zoning regulations either for attached or detached garage buildings. 4. The proposed garage would be out of character with the area, and inconsistent with previous actions of similar requests in the single family zoning district. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this second day of October 2012. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ___________________________ Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST ______________________________ Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 136 MEMORANDUM TO: Mendota Heights Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Grittman DATE: September 20, 2012 MEETING DATE: September 25, 2012 SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a detached garage and Variance from maximum area requirement CASE NO: Case: 12-30; NAC Case: 254.04 -12.17 APPLICANT(S): Robert and Danielle Whebbe LOCATION: 598 Sibley Memorial Highway ZONING: R-1, One Family Residential GUIDE PLAN: LR - Low Density Residential Background and Description of Request: Robert and Danielle Whebbe are seeking a conditional use permit and variances to allow the construction of a detached garage in the rear yard of their property located at 598 Sibley Memorial Highway. Currently, the applicants have an attached garage of approximately 300 square feet (a single car garage). The zoning ordinance allows one garage building on a single family property. Detached garages are allowed by Conditional Use Permit, however, the maximum size of a detached garage is 750 square feet. Attached garages may be built up to 1,200 square feet as permitted accessory uses, and up to 1,500 square feet by CUP. The proposal by the applicant is for one of two options, as summarized below: Option A - Three doors; 1,500 square feet (30 feet x 50 feet) Option B - Three doors; 1,024 square feet (32 feet x 32 feet) page 137 2 The applicant has not stated specifically, but it appears that the intent of the application is to retain the existing attached garage under either of the two scenarios. The new garage structure would be built to the side and rear of the existing house, partially on an adjoining parcel owned by the applicant. To avoid violating building setbacks, this parcel should be combined with the house parcel at the Dakota County Recorder’s office. As noted above, according to Accessory Structure Ordinance 12-1D-3(C)(1) only one private garage, either attached or detached, is allowed for each principal residential structure. The applicant has not indicated the intent to remove the existing attached garage, or convert it into living space. This creates a condition of non-compliance in regards to the number of allowed garages, which will have to be addressed in the course of considering the applicant’s current request for a detached garage. In conjunction with the conditional use permit request, the applicant has also requested approval of a variance to exceed the maximum 750 square foot area requirement applied to detached accessory buildings. As noted, the applicant wishes to construct a building measuring between 1,024 and 1,500 square feet in size. Analysis: Conditional Use Permit. A conditional use permit is required for the construction of detached garages. The applicant has submitted two alternative garage plans for consideration ranging in size from 1.024 to 1,500 square feet in size. Option A is designed with three garage stalls all facing west towards Sibley Memorial Hwy. Option B is designed with two stalls facing west towards Sibley Memorial Hwy, and one stall opening facing north towards the neighboring property. A written description of the materials and design of either garage option has not been provided, however Option B garage elevations appear to indicate a panel steel entrance door and white insulated garage stall doors. According to the Ordinance, accessory buildings located within residential zoning districts may not exceed 15 feet in height. Building height is measured from the average grade of the front building line to the average distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. As a condition of CUP approval, the proposed structure must comply with maximum height requirement of the Ordinance, and it appears that the buildings would comply with this requirement. As a condition of CUP approval, a specific plan alternative should be selected by the applicant. Such plan, drawn to scale, should be modified to specify proposed finish materials, colors and structure height. In consideration of the CUP request, an assurance should be made that the proposed accessory building will be compatible with the site’s principal building. To ensure compatibility, it is recommended that the garage match the principal building in color. page 138 3 While not a specific requirement, it the applicant is also encouraged to match the principal building’s roof style and roof pitch. Variance. The applicant has requested a variance to exceed the maximum 750 square foot area requirement applied to detached accessory buildings. The applicant has submitted two building plan alternatives ranging from 1,024 to 1,500 square feet in size. Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance and when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan. Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. "Practical difficulties," as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance; the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall do not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. Current variance code states that the City “may” grant a variance if it finds “practical difficulties” in using the property in a reasonable manner that is not allowed under the ordinance – this refers to varying from performance standards in the ordinance. In summary, the City must find the following: The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner. The ordinance prohibits this manner of use. The proposed manner of use is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinance and with the Comprehensive Plan. The ordinance creates “practical difficulties” in achieving the manner of use. The difficulties are unique to the property and not created by the owner. The variance will not alter the essential character of the “locality”. In consideration of the applicant’s variance request (from the maximum area requirement applied to detached accessory buildings), the following should be considered: The City has established that a detached accessory building measuring 750 square feet in size is the maximum or “reasonable” limit upon residentially zoned properties. In this regard, a detached accessory structure exceeding this requirement could be deemed “unreasonable” within the context a single family residential neighborhood. The applicants indicated that there are other detached garages in their neighborhood, and that the size of both of the proposed garages would not be excessively large for the property or the neighborhood. In this regard, the applicant believes his proposed building would be consistent in size with other area buildings. page 139 4 In review of aerial photography in the area, the subject neighborhood has detached garages ranging in size up to approximately 750 square feet, with several surrounding garages in the 650 square feet to 750 square feet range. As such, the Option B garage, at approximately 1,024 square feet, would be more in line with existing accessory buildings in the neighborhood, but still larger in size than most surrounding detached garages. The Option A garage, at approximately 1,500 square feet, will be significantly larger than existing detached garages in the neighborhood. The applicants suggest that circumstances unique to their property, and not created by themselves, result in practical difficulties in meeting Ordinance as pertains to garage size. They have indicated that they can’t add onto the existing attached garage to meet their needs for car and garden tractor/tool storage, as the layout of the existing home and garage would require remodeling the kitchen in order to do so. The applicants have not provided the interior layout of their home and garage in order to clarify this argument. Assuming that there is this difficulty, which makes it hard to have a larger attached garage (allowed by conditional use permit up to 1500 square feet), the applicants think that a larger detached garage to meet their needs is a reasonable use of the property. The applicants suggest that a driveway to a detached garage will enable them to turn around within their property, as opposed to backing onto Sibley Memorial Highway, as is currently their practice. In this sense, the property’s unique location may create difficulties in using their existing attached garage (and a possible attached garage expansion) in a reasonable manner. An examination of nearby properties abutting Sibley Memorial Highway using an aerial image demonstrates that neighbors have dealt with the issue of backing onto the highway by either creating turnarounds or expanded driveways. While an expanded drive associated with a new detached garage is one option, an expanded drive might also be created contiguous with an attached garage. So while the property location abutting a highway creates unique drive circumstances, there are options for addressing these difficulties without requiring a variance from garage size requirements. Action Requested: Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission may make one of the following recommendations: A. Conditional Use Permit 1. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit with conditions based upon a finding that the proposed structure is consistent with the intent of the Conditional Use Permit clause allowing detached garages. Conditions may include the following: page 140 5 a. The applicant revises his request to meet the 750 square foot maximum floor area. b. Such plans, drawn to scale, shall be modified to specify proposed finish materials, colors and structure height. c. The garage not exceed 15 feet in height. d. The applicant coordinate the garage’s roof style and roof pitch with that of the principal building. e. The existing attached garage on the site be repurposed as living space as a part of this project, to comply with the maximum allowance of one garage structure on a single family parcel. 2. Denial of the Conditional Use Permit based on findings summarized and attached to this report. B. Variance 1. Approval of the Variance as submitted. Approval would require findings consistent with the requirements for variance approval noted in this report. Draft findings for consideration are attached. 2. Denial of the Variance, based on findings summarized and attached to this report. Staff Recommendation: Planning staff is supportive of the conditional use permit to allow a detached accessory structure upon the subject property only insofar as the applicant can design it in such a way as to comply with other zoning standards of the ordinance. In this case, this would require remodeling of the existing attached garage to living space (to comply with the maximum allowance of one garage building, and redesign of the proposed garage to meet the 750 square foot area standard. Staff does not recommend approval of the associated variance to allow the structure to exceed 750 square feet in size. For the CUP, it has been routine for the City to approve detached accessory buildings in neighborhoods where this type of structure is common, and where the building meets the code requirements for size, location and setback. The purpose of the CUP provision is to ensure that such buildings can compatibly exist on the proposed parcel under these conditions. With regard to the variance, however, a different review standard applies. One of the key factors for variance consideration is uniqueness – a condition must be present that sets the property apart from others that is driving the need for a variance. The applicant’s property is not uncommon in Mendota Heights or the R-1 zoning areas. It page 141 6 would not appear to planning staff that even under a new standard, that the requirements for variance consideration are present. Moreover, given the size of the property in question, it would appear that an attached garage of adequate size can be constructed. Although the applicant raises an issue of kitchen remodeling, it would appear from the available material that the garage could be expanded to the side with little difficulty. Although the subject neighborhood is characterized by some detached garages over the allowed 750 square feet, their nonconforming status reinforces the notion that structures of such size are not consistent with the City’s long-term vision. Thus, the existence of such structures should not justify approval of the requested variance. Supplementary Materials: Application materials dated September 7, 2012 page 142 7 Findings of Fact for Approval Conditional Use Permit and Variances for Detached Garage 598 Sibley Memorial Highway 1. The subject property includes adequate area to accommodate a detached garage of the size proposed. 2. The applicant has shown that remodeling of the home, and/or attachment of the garage to the existing garage area is impractical due to conditions on the property. 3. The applicant has shown that the existing single-car garage space is inadequate, a condition which can be best overcome by the construction of a detached garage. - Variances - 4. The applicant has shown that there are practical difficulties in meeting the requirements of the ordinance for just one garage structure. 5. The applicant has shown that there are practical difficulties in complying with the maximum detached garage floor area of 750 square feet. 6. The applicant has shown that the proposed second garage structure of more than 750 square feet is a reasonable use of the property. 7. The applicant has shown that there are unique conditions on the property, as compared to other parcels in the single family zoning district, which establish the need and reasonableness of the variances. page 143 8 Findings of Fact for Denial Conditional Use Permit and Variances for Detached Garage 598 Sibley Memorial Highway 1. The zoning ordinance requires that Conditional Use Permits must meet other relevant zoning regulations for approval. 2. The proposed detached garage would constitute the second garage structure on the property, counter to zoning regulations. 3. The proposed detached garage (under either application) is greater than the maximum square footage allowed for detached garages in this zoning district. 4. The site appears to have adequate room for the expansion of the existing attached garage in compliance with zoning regulations. 5. The detached garage request could only be accommodated by reducing the size to 750 square feet of floor area, and remodeling the existing attached garage to finished interior space, neither of which is proposed by the applicant. 6. There do not appear to be any unique characteristics of the property that create practical difficulties in complying with the zoning regulations (either for attached or detached garage buildings). 7. The proposed garage would be out of character with the area, and inconsistent with previous actions of similar requests in the single family zoning district. page 144 Ch i p p e w a A v e Butler Ave Winston Ct Miriam S t Iv y H i l l D r Hiawatha Ave Vie w L a Spring S t Simard St A s h l e y L a Fremont Ave Junction La Lo n d o n R d John St Est h e r L a Kirchner Av e D o w n i n g S t Di e g o L a S y l v a n d a l e R d Valley La Ellen St Sut c l i f f C i r B e e b e A v e Br o m p t o n P l Ga r d e n L a Wi n s t o n C i r Ivy Hill Dr Dod d R d Stat e H w y 1 3 Annapolis St Site Location Map Water/Wetlands Major Roads City Roads parcels Municipal Boundaries Delaware Ave 598 Sibley Memorial Highway page 145 page 146 page 147 page 148 page 149 page 150 page 151 page 152 page 153 page 154 Dakota County, MN Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search, appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Map Scale 1 inch = 151 feet page 155