Loading...
1995-07-18CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA Agenda July 18, 1995 - 7:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Adoption 4. Approval of July 6th Minutes. 5. Consent Calendar a. Acknowledgment of the July 11th Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes. b. Acknowledgment of the Treasurer's Report for June. c. Acknowledge Receipt of the Unapproved Minutes from the June 7th NDC -4 Commission Meeting. d. Acknowledge Update on the Water Tower Reconditioning Project. e. Approval to Issue Sign Permit for Sign Face Changes at Finamart/Fina located at 1560 Dodd Road. f. Acceptance of Police Officer Retirement and Authorization to Begin Hiring Process for New Police Officer. g. Approval of the 1995-1996 Labor Contract Settlement between the City of Mendota Heights and Teamsters Local No. 320 and Authorization to Execute a Formal Labor Contract Document. h. Approval of Final Plat for Ivy Falls South - RESOLUTION NO. 95-33 i. Approval of Mendota Heights Athletic Association T -Ball Subsidy Payment. j. Approval of the List of Contractors. k. Approval of the List of Claims. End of Consent Calendar 6. Public Comments 7. Bid Award a. Backstop Extensions at Mendakota Park. 8. Hearing a. Curley's Valley View Addition Street Reconstruction and Feasibility Hearing Update - RESOLUTION NO. 95-34 9. Presentation a. Presentation of Airport Relations Commission and Discuss the Status of On -Going and Upcoming Airport Noise Related Issues. 10. Unfinished and New Business a. Review of Mendota Plaza Improvement Plan. 11. Council Comments 12. Adjourn w Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of Tess than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. Page No. 4455 July 6, 1995 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Minutes of the Regular Meeting Held Tuesday, July 6, 1995 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the regular meeting of the City Council, City of Mendota Heights, was held at 7:30 o'clock P.M. at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Mayor Mertensotto called the meeting to order at 7:30 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Acting Mayor Smith, Councilmembers Huber, Koch, and Krebsbach. Mayor Mertensotto had notified Council that he would be absent. AGENDA ADOPTION Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Councilmember Koch moved adoption of the revised agenda for the meeting. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the minutes of the regular meeting with correction. Councilmember Huber seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CONSENT CALENDAR Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of the consent calendar for the meeting along with authorization for execution of any necessary documents contained therein. a. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the June 14, 1995 Airport Relations Commission meeting. b. Acknowledgment of the minutes of the June 27, 1995 Planning Commission meeting. c. Approval to issue a building permit for exterior remodeling for Farmer's Insurance, 800 South Plaza Drive. d. Adoption of Resolution No. 95-27, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SWANSON'S 2ND ADDITION," and Resolution No. 95-28, "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR SANITARY SEWERS, WATERMAINS, STORM SEWERS AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE SWANSON'S 2ND ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 95, Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 VISITATION CONVENT FOUNDATION PERMIT Page No. 4456 July 6, 1995 PROJECT NO. 2," and approval of a tree removal permit to authorize the developer to remove the trees located within the grading limits. e. Approval of the issuance of a cigarette license to Mendota Liquor. f. Approval of the list of contractor licenses dated July 6, 1995 and attached hereto. g. Approval of the list of claims dated July 6, 1995 and totaling $381,455.86. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from Assistant Batchelder regarding? request from Visitation Convent for a permit to install footings and foundation fora proposed screen house to be located on the Monastery portion of the Visitation property. Council also acknowledged a letter from the Visitation Sisters and a floor plan and site plan for the proposed structure. Sister Helen Ann Wilkie, representing the Convent, stated that the sisters are seeking approval of a footing and foundation permit for a screen house, which requires a conditional use permit, and fully intends to work with the Planning Commission. She explained that the screen house is a donation as a memorial and the family of the donor will be in St. Paul in August. She stated that the Convent would like to honor them by holding a dedication ceremony when the family is in town but must begin footing and foundation construction before Planning Commission action in order to complete the structure on time. She explained that construction of the actual structure will not occur until after Planning Commission and City Council approval of the conditional use permit. Sister Wilkie informed Council that there are 23 members in the Visitation community and in order to create a screen porch large enough to house that number of sisters the structure must be larger than the 144 square feet allowed in the city's ordinance. She stated that the structure will be shielded by trees and will not have any visual impact. Councilmember Huber pointed out that the structure would not even be observed by someone driving by and he would have no objections to it. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 95-08, KING Page No. 4457 July 6, 1995 Councilmember Koch moved to approve the issuance of a footing and foundation permit, at the applicant's risk, pending an application for conditional use permit for accessory structure. Councilmember Huber seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from Assistant Batchelder regarding a request from Mr. Lawrence King, 5 Beebe Avenue, for an amendment to the conditional use permit and variances for a detached garaged issued by Council on June 6, 1995. Mr. Wally Pischke, contractor for the garage, was present to represent the Kings. He explained that the original proposal was to construct a new garage on the existing garage foundation but after inspecting the foundation it was discovered that the foundation has no frost footings and is not adequate for the new structure. He informed'Council that the Kings are requesting approval to remove the existing garage and foundation and build a new structure. Acting Mayor Smith stated that the garage will be approximately 15 feet, 7 inches from the right-of-way. She noted that the property is a through lot that backs onto another street, which is the reason why a conditional use permit is needed. Acting Mayor Smith stated that the existing structure is eight feet from the side lot line, which would require a two foot variance, asked if the height variance is still required. Mr. Pischke responded that the height will be three feet less than the height approved on June 6, and neither a height variance nor a size variance will be needed. Administrator Lawell informed Council that if it wishes, it can revoke the unnecessary variances which were granted on June 6 and start fresh this evening. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that in essence Council would be approving a new detached garage. She asked what will change, noting that there is a problem with the footings and therefore the structure will change from what was originally proposed. Mr. Pischke stated that the garage as approved in June was barely big enough for two cars, and as long as Mr. King has to build a new garage because of the footings, he would like to build larger and can also move it on the lot. Page No. 4458 July 6, 1995 Responding to a question from Councilmember Krebsbach on whether Council should be concerned about approving a new detached garage, Administrator Lawell stated that the fact that there is an existing structure that cannot be changed. He explained that under the existing building code the city cannot allow the Kings to expand the garage and they wish to replace it with something more compatible with their desires. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that she understands the complications of the first proposal and asked if the applicants are still planning to use the loft area for storage. She also asked if Council would be significantly departing from the ordinance because this would be a new detached garage. Assistant Batchelder responded that if this was a garage being proposed on a vacant piece of land a conditional use permit would be required and the most current proposal before Council would fit within the guidelines of the ordinance relating to detached garages. He explained that it fits within the size allowed by ordinance and the conditional permit would be required by virtue of the fact that it is a detached garage on a through lot. He stated that this is why it was processed through the Planning Commission as a conditional use permit and until it was inspected by the city's code enforcement office the owners did not know that the structure could not be built on the existing foundation. Responding to a question from Acting Mayor Smith, Mr. Pischke stated that the Kings have already constructed the circular drive in the front of the home. He also stated that all exposed areas of the structure will be cedar siding to match the house, and the roof pitch of 10:12 will blend in with the 9:12 pitch on the house. Acting Mayor Smith stated that she feels the proposal is a much better solution and provides for safer entrance and exit from the garage. She pointed out that the same stipulations attached to the original approval will apply, including that the loft can only be used for storage. Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 95- 30, "A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO 95-24 TO APPROVE A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR DETACHED GARAGE AT 5 BEEBE AVENUE." Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 95-12, PASTER Page No. 4459 July 6, 1995 Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Ed Paster, Mendota Mall Associates, for a conditional use permit for a liquor store in the Mendota Plaza shopping center. Council also acknowledged associated staff reports. Mr. Paster and Mr. Robert Rickes, from Mendota Mall Associates, and Mr. Patrick Soeun, owner of Mendota Liquor, were present for the discussion. Mr. Paster explained that a conditional use permit is required to operate a liquor store in the B-4 District and that the permit issued to MGM Liquors expired since no one has occupied the store facility for over six months. He informed Council that Mr. Soeun and Mr. Rickes have met with Dakota Alliance for Prevention representatives and Police Chief Delmont and Officer Bridger. Mr. Soeun informed Council that he met with DAP representatives yesterday and that he will cooperate with all laws regarding minors and will report to the Police Department any minors who come into the store for liquor. Mr. Rickes stated that at the meeting all laws regarding sale of liquor to minors were reviewed and that Mr. Soeun has agreed to uphold all of the laws of the state and the city. He explained that cigarette sales were also discussed at the meeting. Councilmember Krebsbach was concerned over sales of cigarettes to minors and whether minors are allowed in liquor stores. Administrator Lawell responded that he does not believe there is any legal restriction to prohibit minors from entering the establishment, but the problem is if they represent themselves as 21 in order to purchase liquor. He stated that most liquor stores have signs posted that say that if individuals are not 21 years of age they cannot enter the facility. He also stated that he does not believe there is a law that would prevent someone 18 years or older to buy cigarettes in the facility. Mr. Soeun stated that it will be his practice that if someone appears to him to be under 21 he will ask for identification and ask them to leave the store if they are not of legal age. Councilmember Krebabach stated that she would encourage Mr. Soeun to discourage the sale of cigarettes to 18 to 21 year olds. Acting Mayor Smith agreed, stating that it would make it much easier to operate his business if he kept sales of cigarettes as well as liquor to age 21 and over. Page No. 4460 July 6, 1995 Mr. Paster stated that Mendota Mall Associates shares Council's concerns and wants the shopping center to be a family oriented and full service center and discourages any activity that would be harmful to the city. He further stated that his representatives will be watching the operation carefully to make sure it is following the high standards of both the city and the shopping center. Responding to a question about hours of operation, Mr. Soeun stated that the hours of operation of the store will be in accordance with the city ordinances, that he will probably open at 8:30 or 9:00 a.m. and close at 9 p.m. on weekdays and 10:00 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. Councilmember Huber asked what advertising will be done at the store. Mr. Soeun responded that there will be a sign in the sign band, and that at least the bottom six feet of the window area will be kept free of advertising to accommodate the police department's need to see inside the store. Council informed Mr. Soeun that the city does not allow large advertising pieces, like the helium devices often seen advertising liquor stores. Councilmember Koch asked if Council can legally encourage Mr. Soeun to discourage sales of cigarettes to anyone under age 21 and whether he can be legally held to that restriction. City Attorney Hart responded that the age discrimination generally protected class is age forty and over, and he did not think there would be any violation by encouraging Mr. Soeun to sell cigarettes only to those aged 21 and over. He informed Council that it is not a crime for someone under 21 to enter a liquor store, as there are many items in the store that could legally be sold to a person of any age, but stated that there is no legal problem that he can see in restricting sales to individuals 21 and over. Councilmember Huber moved adoption of Resolution No. 95-29, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MENDOTA LIQUOR." Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 LIQUOR LICENSE, MENDOTA Council acknowledged a memo from the City Clerk regarding the LIQUOR Mendota Liquor application for off -sale liquor license. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 HEARING - EMERSON STREET VACATION Page No. 4461 July 6, 1995 Councilmember Huber moved to authorize the issuance of an off - sale intoxicating liquor license to Mr. Patrick Soeun for the Mendota Liquor facility. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. Acting Mayor Smith opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on an application from Mr. Terrance Fenlon, 670 Laura Court, for the vacation of a portion of the Emerson Avenue right-of- way adjacent to his lot. Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson and a proposed resolution. Acting Mayor Smith stated that Mr. Fenelon desires to construct an addition to the rear of his home, and the vacation of a portion of the right-of-way will preclude the need for a variance for the addition. Mr. Fenlon stated that his lot is long and thin and that he would like to construct an addition but in order to do so he would be too close to the lot line. He explained that when he discussed the matter with the City Planner it appeared that it would be best to request the vacation so that a variance is not necessary. Acting Mayor Smith asked if staff sees any reason to believe that at any future time Emerson Avenue will be used as a through way. She stated that she does not recall Council vacating portions of rights-of-way and asked if the entire right-of-way should be vacated. Public Works Director Danielson responded that he does not envision that portion of Emerson ever being constructed, as it is very rugged terrain with wetlands. He stated that the right-of-way is generally being used as back yard area by abutting property owners. He explained that since there are wetlands in the right-of-way the city would have to retain easements. He recommended that Council consider vacating the remaining right-of-way as abutting property owners apply for vacation. He explained that if the vacation is approved for Mr. Fenelon, the city will retain drainage and utility easement rights over the land and will no longer be fee owner of the property. Councilmember Huber asked if the vacated area would become a part of the Fenelon lot. Public Works Director Danielson responded that it would. He explained that Mr. Fenelon currently has a through lot, because of the right-of-way, and would need a setback variance to construct the addition if the vacation is not approved. He Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 4462 July 6, 1995 informed Council that it is his preference that Council consider vacations on a case by case basis, particularly to the south of the Fenelon property where there is a holding pond that was constructed for drainage purposes. Mr. Fenelon agreed that vacations of the right-of-way should be looked at on a case by case basis as there are some potential drainage problems and many lots would be too close to streams and would require DNR permits. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that the request seems simple, but approving it would affect the public street. Acting Mayor Smith stated that by approving the vacation Council would be effectively saying that a street will never be built between Laura Street and Sylvandale Road. Acting Mayor Smith asked for questions and comments from the audience. There being no questions or comments, Councilmember Huber moved that the hearing be closed. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Responding to a Council questions, Mr. Danielson stated that currently the city owns the property and it is a platted street Approval would vacate the street rights but by requiring easement dedication, the city still has the right to use the area for drainage and utility improvements. Acting Mayor Smith asked if there would be any restrictions on plantings and alterations within the easement area. She also asked if there are any drainage issues involved in the area Mr. Fenelon would like vacated. Mr. Danielson responded that nearly all platted lots in the city have drainage and utility easements over the rear yard and people do construct fences and plantings within the easement area but do so with the knowledge that the city has the right to do work within the easement, including moving structures. He stated that there is a low area in the right-of-way and a drainage pond in the Fenelon back yard: drainage goes west from the Fenelon lot and goes down the back yards across Sylvandale to the creek. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 95-09, PALMER Page No. 4463 July 6, 1995 Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 95- 30, "RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF A PORTION OF EMERSON AVENUE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY," approving the vacation of the north half of Emerson Avenue abutting Lot 10, Block 3, Ivy Falls 2nd Addition, reserving a permanent drainage and utility easement over the vacated area. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. It was noted that it is the intent of the city that the 30 foot wide vacated right-of-way revert to the Fenelons, that the property be attached to the Fenelon lot and their property will be the beneficiary of the vacation. City Attorney advised staff to be certain to record certified copies of the vacation resolution and reservation of the easements so that the city easement reservation is communicated to future prospective purchasers. Council acknowledged an application from Mrs. LuDelia Palmer for approval of a wetlands permit to allow construction of a fence on her lot at 675 Ivy Falls Court. Council also acknowledged associated staff reports along with letters from Mr. & Mrs. Palmer and from the Ivy Falls Home Owners' Association and signatures of consent from adjoining property owners. Mrs. Palmer informed Council that she has puppies that need to be restricted and proposes to install a three rail split rail cedar fence with wire backing. She stated that the Planning Commission recommended approval with the condition that the construction be completed by September 1 and that a survey be completed and filed with the city. She informed Council that she has arranged for the survey to be done on July 12 and that she will file a copy with the city. Responding to a question regarding the wire, she stated that it will be galvanized mesh. She informed Council that she plans to landscape along the fence and that she believes the split rail will blend into the background and the galvanized mesh will not be visible. She stated that none of the existing landscaping will be removed and plantings will be added. She explained that her home is at the crest of the hill with Ivy Falls Creek below and that there are some erosion problems. Acting Mayor Smith stated that it is her understanding that the fence will follow the crest of the property and will not go down the hill. Mrs. Palmer responded that this is correct. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 95-10, PAR 3 Page No. 4464 July 6, 1995 Councilmember Krebsbach stated that the main Planning Commission concern was that the Palmers have the consent of their neighbors. Mrs. Palmer responded that she has received the written consent of everyone but the owners of 667 Ivy Falls Court who has recently purchased the home but has not yet moved in. She informed Council that she has spoken to the new owner by phone and they have no objections. Acting Mayor Smith stated that the Planning Commission waived the public hearing requirement, which is why they required consenting signatures. Councilmember Koch moved approval of a wetlands permit to allow construction of a fence, as proposed, to within fifty feet of Ivy Falls Creek, conditioned upon preparation and submission of a survey, completion of the fence by September 1, 1995. Councilmember Huber seconded the motion. Council acknowledged an application from Mr. Michael Cashill for a sign size and setback variance for a 48 square foot sign for the golf course to be placed within 3 feet of the property line along Dodd Road. Council also acknowledged associated staff reports. Mr. Cashill and Mr. Alan Spaulding were present for the discussion. Mr. Spaulding stated that the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval with the condition that the poles from the former sign at the northeast corner of the property be removed. He informed Council that the sign has been removed and he has agreed to remove the poles and will landscape below the new sign. Acting Mayor Smith stated that the Planning Commission made generally favorable comments and agreed that it is an improvement to have only one sign for the facility. She further stated that it was pointed out by the commission that the sign size restrictions are generally for single family homes in R-1 and in this case there is a commercial use in the district which presents a slightly different situation. She pointed out that the Planning Commission felt that the size and design and colors of the sign were appropriate for the area. She expressed concern over the setback, stating that right now the road is 33 feet wide and the right-of-way is 60 feet, so there is quite a distance between the edge of the road and the sign, but the city cannot control what the state may do in the future. She asked Page No. 4465 July 6, 1995 what Council can do to accommodate the sign in its requested location without having to grant a variance. She felt that a variance would not be appropriate given the potential for widening Dodd. Mr. Cashill responded that the type of sign construction would allow him to move the sign very easily - the original sign was only one foot narrower and was in its location over thirty years. He stated that he would be happy to move the sign if Dodd is ever widened. Councilmember Krebsbach moved approval of a 36 foot sign size variance and 7 foot sign setback variance to allow the proposed sign, in accordance with the site plan in Case File No. 95-10, with the condition that 25 square foot of landscaping be installed around the sign and that the two poles from the former sign at the northeast corner of the property be removed, with the stipulation that the sign be located no nearer than 17 feet from the edge of the paved surface of Dodd Road and no nearer than three feet from the right-of-way. Councilmember Huber seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 95-11, Council acknowledged an application from Mr. & Mrs. Thomas McNAMARA McNamara, 2371 Swan Drive, for a conditional use permit for a 16 foot by 24 foot accessory structure and front yard setback variance. Council also acknowledged reports from the City Planner and Administrative Assistant and a letter from the McNamaras. Acting Mayor Smith stated that she understands the shed will be in the location of an existing shed and behind some large pine trees and would be very difficult to see from Lake Drive. She noted that the Planning Commission had expressed concerns over the design of the shed. Mr. McNamara presented revised drawings for the structure, informing Council that the garage style door on the front of the structure will be facing east, towards the house. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that there was much discussion over the garage door, and the revised plan still shows a garage door. She further stated that she believes it was the understanding of the Planning Commission in recommending approval that the door would be changed so that the structure would not look so much like a garage. Mrs. McNamara responded that they want the overhead door for several reasons, stating that other doors have to be opened out and Page No. 4466 July 6, 1995 they need an overhead door to get their lawn tractor and plow in and out. She stated that they feel the overhead door would be better for security. She further stated that if the overhead door is eliminated, the structure would lose some of its utility. Assistant Batchelder stated that the Commission did discuss the door but did not specifically require barn -type doors as a condition. He stated that the condition was that the architectural design of the shed must match the existing home, so that it would look more like a shed than a garage, and that the Commission discussed matching the roof pitch and the larger overhang on the house. Acting Mayor Smith stated that Council has been fastidious about only allowing the number of garages allowed by ordinance and when someone has an attached garage, for example, and needs another larger garage or structure Council has been specific that the existing garage no longer be used for garage purposes. She stated that in this case the structure will not be a garage but will have the utility of a garage. Mrs. McNamara responded that there will not be a driveway to the structure and that she does not think any future owner would want to put a driveway in. Further, she stated that the structure faces the house and not the street. With respect to how the structure would be used in the future, she stated that she did not feel anyone would use it as a garage as trees and a utility pole would have to be removed and a curb cut would have to be made in Lake Drive for a driveway. Mr. McNamara stated that he does not think the city would allow another curb cut and informed Council that he has no plan to put in a driveway of any kind to the storage shed. He stated that while there would be an overhead garage door there is no intent to make the shed into any kind of a building to store vehicles except the lawn tractor. He explained that there are many evergreens along Lake Drive which he would not remove, and the structure could not be seen from Lake Drive. Councilmember Krebsbach asked if there is any way to make the shed look less like a garage, noting that the shed will probably remain after the McNamaras sell their property. Mrs. McNamara responded that some of the things the Planning Commission recommended have been implemented - the overhang and roof pitch have been modified to match the appearance of the house. She stated that if someone every wanted to make the shed into a garage they could very easily put in a garage door in the future Page No. 4467 July 6, 1995 but she did not think anyone would ever want to use it as a garage. She stated that it would be very unattractive to put pavement to the structure and also there is a butternut tree in front of the door which would have to be removed in order to get a car into the structure. Responding to a Council question, Mr. McNamara stated that two windows were added in response to the Planning Commission request and to make the structure more closely match the house. Attorney Hart stated that the concerns are a matter of notice to the successors of the McNamaras. He did not think Council should rely on the good sense of future owners and suggested that since the application is for a conditional use permit, a condition could be that the structure cannot be used for autos and trucks and other certificated vehicles. He pointed out that the conditional permit would be recorded against the property and would place those limitations on subsequent owners. He stated that since it would be on record that the structure could not be used for those kinds of things, they would be prohibited and if anyone were to use the shed for such storage, enforcement would be the issue. Acting Mayor Smith stated that she is also concerned about the proposed size of the shed. She asked about the lot size. Mr. McNamara responded that the lot is 1 1/8 to 1 1/4 acres in land. Acting Mayor Smith stated that it was her impression that even with a conditional use permit a structure of the proposed size would not be allowed on a lot of this size, but apparently this is not the case. Mrs. McNamara responded that they wanted a larger building but scaled it back after a preliminary meeting with city staff, and any reduction in size of the proposed shed would not meet their needs. She explained that their goal is to not have a yard full of things, and since their house is brick they could not add a third stall to their garage for storage of items now kept outside. Assistant Batchelder distributed copies of the sections of the Zoning Ordinance relating to accessory structures. He stated that there is no limit other than 1,000 square feet in maximum size for conditional use permits for structures other than private detached garages. He further stated that accessory structures as permitted uses in the R-1 district can be 144 square feet. Acting Mayor Smith stated that she never though it was Council's intent when the ordinance language was revised to allow a potential Page No. 4468 July 6, 1995 accessory structure of up to 1,000 square feet. She stated that Council will have to revisit the accessory structure provisions, but for now the provisions apply. Mrs. McNamara asked whether they could build a three car garage if they decided to turn their existing garage into a family room. She stated that they have been struggling for eight years to find the best solution to their storage problems. Administrator Lawell responded that a detached garage is a permitted use so long as there is no attached garage. Assistant Batchelder added that the city would probably require that the driveway and doors be removed from the existing garage. Mr. McNamara suggested that if Council looks at revising the ordinance that percentage of lot size is used - for instance allowing a structure of 1% of lot size for lots less than an acre. He explained that he has two pretty bad looking sheds on their lot now and their intent is to improve the appearance of their lot for their neighbors and the community be removing those sheds and building the new one. Acting Mayor Smith stated that she would agree that what the McNamaras are doing is appropriate for their lot because it would not affect any of their neighbors and would be well screened from the street as well, but Council must make sure it is being consistent. Responding to a question from Councilmember Koch, Mr. McNamara stated that he proposes to put in a two to three foot apron in front of the large door and perhaps some stepping stones in front of the small one and the structure will be built on a concrete floating slab. Councilmember Krebsbach moved adoption of Resolution No. 95- 32, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE AND SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 2371 SWAN DRIVE," in accordance with the plans submitted July 6, 1995, with the following additional conditions: that the shed will be used only for storage of objects which would normally be stored in sheds; that the shed may not be used to store passenger vehicles or trucks; that a certified copy of the resolution be filed with Dakota County against the property, incorporating into the resolution the legal description of the parcel. Councilmember Koch seconded the motion. Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 CASE NO. 95-05, THARALDSON Page No. 4469 July 6, 1995 Councilmember Krebsbach pointed out that it is also the intent of the motion that there may not be any access to the shed from Lake Drive. Council acknowledged an application from Tharaldson Enterprises for a conditional use permit to operate a restaurant in the Heritage Inn. Council also acknowledged a reports from Assistant Batchelder and the City Planner, along with letters from Heritage Inn regarding parking, a letter from Northwest Airlines and information from the _restaurant operator, Bon Appetit regarding the menu and hours of operation. - Mr. Bill Ripeth, legal representative for Tharaldson, reviewed parking needs. He explained that the restaurant is part of a private hotel that is under contract with Northwest Airlines, which uses the hotel to lodge trainees, and stated that probably 50% of the occupants are bussed to the site. He stated that the proof of parking plan for the hotel provides for 127 parking spaces and there are currently 73 parking spaces on site. Reviewing a parking survey completed by the hotel, he stated that at the peak period, 43 parking spaces are used. He felt that this statistic is representative of the hotel's parking needs since it is a private hotel. He stated that since many people will be bussed to the restaurant from the Northwest training facilities, Tharaldson feels that only 21 spaces will be needed for parking for the public restaurant. He explained that :although the restaurant will be open to the public, it will not be advertised. He explained that part of the desire to not expand the parking is to keep the existing landscaped area as a campus area. He felt that parking is the main issue in considering the conditional use permit. He stated that the Planning Commission's condition number 4 would require Tharaldson to enter into an agreement with the Marriott for overflow parking, but as a practical matter overflow parking will occur because people from the Marriott facility will be using the Heritage Cafe. He stated that it is difficult for Tharaldson as a legal matter to condition parking on an agreement with Marriott and that it is not likely the Marriott would give Tharaldson a conditional right. He stated that he could not recommend the condition to Tharaldson because it would be a condition that is off site. He felt that Tharaldson has demonstrated the low demand for parking at the Heritage Inn site (through the parking survey), and pointed out that Council can at any time order the Heritage Inn to provide the additional under the proof of parking plan. He informed Council that at the time the hotel use changes to a public hotel, the restaurant will have to be removed to provide a swimming pool under Tharaldson's original conditional use permit. Page No. 4470 July 6, 1995 Acting Mayo ert: so ' asked how Northwest Airlines feels about the restaurant since the facility is under contract to Northwest. Mr. Ripeth responded that Northwest has requested the change, and often works with the Marriott as well. He explained that the restaurant would benefit all of the Northwest employees that stay at the Marriott or at the Heritage Inn, particularly given the closing of the Courtyard's restaurant. He stated that opening the restaurant to the public will insure that it will be a profitable enterprise over the ten year life of the Northwest contract. Acting Mayor Smith pointed out that the original Tharaldson plan did not include a kitchen and when the amended plan came before Council to include the kitchen, Council was told that Northwest would operate the kitchen, contracting for food service. Mr. Ripeth responded that the restaurant is owned by the Heritage Inn, which has contracted with Bon Appetit, a restaurant management company, which will provide the full service management. Administrator Lawell informed Council that Mr. Bill Fitzgerald, from Northwest Airlines, faxed two letters to the city this afternoon. One of the letters talks about opening the restaurant to the public for lunch service. The other letter discusses approval from Northwest's vice-president of operations C Foushee's approval of the serving of beer and wine in the hotel restaurant facility during the time the restaurant is open to the public. Mr. Ripeth responded that currently about 20 people are bussed in the evening off site because they would like beer or wine with dinner. He stated that the Heritage Inn will not have a bar setting and would only serve beer and wine with food service. Acting Mayor Smith stated that Tharaldson has researched who the anticipated guests will be and asked if it anticipates that they will be guests of the Marriott and Heritage Inn hotels. Mr. Ripeth responded that the Heritage Inn people would like to market to the corporate people in the business park, through distribution of handbills, to round out some of the slow periods. Acting Mayor Smith stated that she wants to make sure that it is the intent not to extend the use of the public restaurant should the building become public. She stated that if that possibility is even remotely possible, Tharaldson would want to consider acquiring Page No. 4471 July 6, 1995 additional land additional parking for the facility while land is available. With respect to the recommended Marriott/Heritage Inn agreement, she stated that she agrees with Mr. Ripeth's position on overflow from the Marriott. She stated that the Marriott has its own requirement for parking and the city cannot require them to give up some of their spaces. She informed Mr. Ripeth that she wants to be sure that the Heritage Inn project has sufficient parking. Mr. Ripeth responded that there are 54 more parking spaces available in the proof of parking plan before Tharaldson would have to go off site for parking. Mr. Ken Scheel, from Tharaldson, stated that Tharaldson has 170 hotels and only adds restaurants if needed by a client. He stated that swimming pools are much better draws, and that he cannot foresee Tharaldson ever keeping the restaurant versus a swimming pool in the Heritage Inn if it ever becomes public. Councilniember Krebsbach informed Mr. Ripeth that if the condition on agreement with Marriott for parking is deleted from the permit conditions, Tharaldson would have to build out the proof of parking should parking needs exceed what is available. Acting Mayor Smith stated that Council could perhaps have a period of time where the city can see how much parking is being used and could then require the construction of additional if it is deemed appropriate. Mr. Ripeth stated that Mr. Scheel has agreed to implement the proof of parking plan if, after a six month period the extra parking is needed. Administrator Lawell stated that at any time the city could require Tharaldson, and Tharaldson would be obligated, to build out the additional parking. He stated that the city could define the mechanism for that, including annual review. Councilmember Krebsbach stated that the discussion two years ago was that there would never be a restaurant and then Tharaldson asked for a kitchen and now it is asking for a restaurant. She stated that she cannot envision a company not going into this business with the intent of not making it successful, and if the company has done its studies one would think parking should be built. Mr. Ripeth responded that all of the modifications over the past two years have been driven by the unique contract with Northwest, Page No. 4472 July 6, 1995 which has chosen to contract with Tharaldson and others to provide exclusive service and has asked for changes over time. He stated that if Tharaldson thought it had a parking issue it would rather have the spaces in to satisfy its customers. He informed Council that Tharaldson is prepared to put in all 127 parking spaces, but for aesthetic purposes would like to keep the green space in the interim. Responding to a Council comment about Northwest subsidizing the restaurant, Mr. Ripeth stated that part of the contract would be that Northwest must provide a minimum amount of revenue to keep the restaurant in operation. He informed Council that every request Tharaldson has made to the city has first come from Northwest, which also initiated the beer and wine sale proposal. Councilmember Huber stated that he feels this is a situation where if Council knew in the beginning what it now knows, the original conditional use might not have been approved. Councilnfember Krebsbach stated that she feels that if Tharaldson can meet the parking and feels that it has the need for the restaurant she has less of a problem with a proposal than if Tharaldson had requested the restaurant in the beginning. Acting Mayor Smith stated that since it is within the city's prerogative to require additional parking if it becomes apparent that additional parking is need, that is the comfort the city needs. She did not think Council wants more asphalt than is necessary. Councilmember Koch asked if Councilmember Huber feels that 123 parking spaces would not be sufficient. Councilmember Huber responded that if Council had viewed the proposal in total when Tharaldson first came to Council he is not sure that it would have been approved. He wondered whether Council would have said it wanted the full number of parking spaces constructed, but stated that the fact of the matter is that this is a situation where Council has allowed the developer to come in with unfmished parking. He asked whether Council would have to ask staff to do a site visit nightly to see if there is overflow parking. Acting Mayor Smith stated that the checks would certainly have to be made periodically. Councilmember Huber stated that he is not saying that food service in a hotel is an inappropriate use, but what is unique that what is a Page No. 4473 July 6, 1995 single client hotel will now have the entire business park as its clients. Mr. Ripeth responded that more than 50% of the clients use ground transportation that is provided by Northwest, so that drives down the parking need to 50%. He stated that if the hotel ever becomes public the restaurant will have to be changed to a pool, and 127 parking spaces would satisfy the parking requirement for the facility. Councilmember Huber stated that his concern is that Tharaldson keeps coming back every six months asking for more. He asked what Tharaldson is really trying to build. Mr. Scheel responded that the project is driven by Northwest and when the matter was presented to the Planning Commission it recommended approval on a month to month basis with city staff. He stated that Tharaldson has agreed to do a daily study and if at any time city staff feels more parking is needed, it will be built. Councilmember Krebsbach pointed out that Dale Glowa has stated that there is a need for a restaurant in the business park. She thought that the restaurant will provide a service to the park and many of the people will walk to it. Responding to a question from Acting Mayor Smith regarding the restaurant menu, Mr. David Toay, from Bon Appetit, stated that one of the reasons the kitchen was built was because Northwest wants food service all day long (breakfast, lunch, dinner) where food is prepared on the premises. He stated that the menu changes quite a bit to give different offerings, but there will be sandwiches, salads and pastas etc. for lunch and fish and other items for dinner. He stated that the food will be made to order on-site. Acting Mayor Smith stated that her concerns were: 1.) where Northwest stood on the restaurant and liquor; 2.) the ability of the site to accommodate the additional use and a continued use should the hotel become public. She stated that apparently Northwest initiated the request for the restaurant and that Council has also been informed that the restaurant will not continue if the hotel goes public and added parking under the proof of parking plan will not be needed. She noted that Councilmember Huber's concern was over the incremental approach taken by Tharaldson, and stated that perhaps Northwest wanted to see the scope of the facility expanded. She stated that she has also heard that it was a good idea to have a restaurant in the area and while this may not be the ideal location, it Ayes: Nays: i SUNFISH LAKE GRAVITY OUTLET Page No. 4474 July 6, 1995 would provide a welcome addition to the business park as well as to the Marriott. Attorney Hart stated that he would like the record to reflect that 1) proof of parking can be implemented based on the determination of city staff that there is insufficient parking on site to serve the facility; and 2) that the applicant will in a timely fashion, and with reasonably diligence, construct additional parking if from time to time it is determined necessary by the city. Mr. Ripeth agreed that Tharaldson would agree to constructing additional parking if determined necessary by the city. He stated that the request is for a public facility which will include wine and strong beer and that Tharaldson will go through the liquor license application process. Councilmember Krebsbach pointed out that the applicant must understand that there is no assurance that a liquor license will be granted. " - Councilmember Koch moved adoption of Resolution No. 95-33, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A RESTAURANT FOR HERITAGE INN," revised to add a condition that city staff monitor parking at the facilities and to add the conditions recommended by Attorney Hart, and to delete the requirement for written agreement on overflow parking between the Marriott and the Heritage Inn. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. Council acknowledged a memo from Public Works Director Danielson regarding a request from the City of Sunfish Lake to consider providing a lake outlot for Sunfish Lake. Mr. Danielson reviewed the request for Council, stating that a proposed joint powers agreement is currently being developed and that he brought the matter to Council this evening to ask for Council input. Acting Mayor Smith stated that Council would have to first be concerned with Mendota Heights capacity for its own run off and ensure that the Mendota Heights system can handle the excess capacity (from Sunfish Lake) which has not yet been determined. She further stated that the outlet would also involve the potential for Sunfish Lake to develop at a greater level as well, and that could also affect the level of the lake. She asked if research has been done Page No. 4475 July 6, 1995 to determine the additional capacity needed to accommodate any additional development within the watershed district. Public Works Director Danielson responded that Sunfish Lake is being developed residentially, which has the least run-off potential, and there is ample storage space within the watershed system to handle the added water. He stated that the check/balance is that should it become a problem, the flow from the lake could be metered down. Acting Mayor Smith asked if the level of the Copperfield pond and other ponding areas will increase as well. Mr. Danielson responded that it will not, and that the level of all of the city's ponding in the southeast area is all controlled downstream now. Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the city needs to be concerned that lowering Sunfish Lake to the appropriate level will not fill the city's ponds. Mr. Danielson responded that the Mendota Heights ponds have sufficient capacity and the water will keep running. He stated that two things could be done to stop the flow for periods of time should problems occur downstream such as a blockage - there will be a joint powers agreement, which will address Council's concerns, and there will be a hold harmless agreement to protect the city. Administrator Lawell stated that the level of Sunfish Lake is rising and perhaps the joint powers agreement should restrict building close to the lake. Acting Mayor Smith suggested that the restriction could be based on a specific distance from the high water mark. Councilmember Huber stated that Council wants to make sure that there is nothing new coming into Sunfish Lake that would then drain to Mendota Heights and create a headwater. Councilmember Krebsbach asked if the metering could be done on an emergency basis rather than on an on-going basis, which would eliminate Council's concerns. Public Works Director Danielson responded that he will look into the suggestion. Acting Mayor Smith suggested that staff seek out similar situations around the Twin Cities area to see what problems have arisen. She pointed out that the major concern is that the city does not become liable if the Mendota Heights system cannot handle the flow. Page No. 4476 July 6, 1995 Mr. Danielson responded that he will provide Council with details on the design of the Copperfield pond when the joint powers agreement is brought to Council. He informed Council that the engineers for Sunfish Lake have looked at what impact the outlet would have on the Copperfield pond. He stated that the biggest problem that has occurred in the Copperfield area is damming done by beavers and if the city is vigilant with removing the dams there should be no problems. He stated that Mendota Heights really cannot refuse the outlet since both cities are members of the watershed maintenance organization and the WMO could force the city to enter into an agreement. Acting Mayor Smith stated that Council would rather work cooperatively with Sunfish Lake and arrive at a solution to protect all parties concerned. LEXINGTON POND Public Works Director Danielson briefly reviewed his memo on the status of the Lexington/Marie pond maintenance. COUNCIL COMMENTS Acting Mayor Smith stated that the "rough road" signs which had been placed along Mendota Heights Road near Mendota Meadows has been removed even though the ruts left from bringing the utilities across Mendota Heights Road to the development remain. PARK ISSUES Public Works Director Danielson responded that he was not aware that the signs had been removed and will direct public works personnel to replace them. He explained that bituminous is installed in several lifts and only the first course has been installed. He stated that there is always some settlement which occurs and it is best to wait as long as possible before installing the second course. Public Works Director Danielson informed Council on the progress of the water tower reconditioning project, stating that the contractor believes that the project will be completed by the July 15 deadline. Administrator Lawell informed Council that staff has been trying to meet with the various Mendakota Park ballfield users but may not be able to meet with all user groups in time to bring the matter back before Council on July 18. He stated that he hopes to schedule the issue for Council discussion in early August and all parties will be notified of the date that the ballfield issues will be considered. Acting Mayor Smith stated that she does not believe that it is critical that the matter be on the July 18 agenda and stated that it is much ADJOURN Ayes: 4 Nays: 0 Page No. 4477 July 6, 1995 more important that a complete review be done before the matter returns to Council. Assistant Batchelder announced that the "Celebrate Mendota Heights Parks!" will be held on July 22. Responding to a question from Councilmember Koch, Assistant Batchelder gave an update on the Ivy Falls Park landscaping project. There being no further business to come before the Council, Councilmember Koch moved that the meeting be adjourned to the City Council budget workshop to be held on July 11, 1995. Councilmember Krebsbach seconded the motion. TIME OF ADJOURNMENT: 10:22 o'clock P.M. w ATTEST: Charles E. Mertensotto Mayor Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL July 6, 1995 Excavating Contractor License Daves Excavating Inc. Glen Rehbein Excavating, Icne Gas Piping Contractor License Climate Engineering Co. Cronstrom's Heating & A/C Minnegasco, A Division of Noram Energy Corp. HVAC Contractor License Climate Engineering Co. Cronstrom's Heating & A/C • LSV Metals Inc. Minnegasco, A Division of Norma Energy Corp. General Contractors License C & M Specialty Sales, Inc. dba Chanhassen Kitchen & Bath Russell J. Gagner Nardini Fire Equipment Twin City Acoustics CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES JULY 11, 1995 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Parks and Recreation Commission was held on Tuesday, July 11, 1995, in the City Hall Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 6:35 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Kleinglass, Damberg, Linnell. Also present was Parks Project Manger Guy Kullander. Dennis Delmont, Police Chief was also present. There being no quorum the commission decided to talk to Kay Fredrickson of Curley Valley View Addition who wanted to talk to the Commission. DISCUSSION OF BASKETBALL COURT IN CURLEYS TOT LOT Kay Fredrickson said she was representing a group of people from Curley Valley View Addition who were excited and in support of a basketball court in Valley View Park (formerly Curleys tot lot). Commissioner Linnell responded that the commission was reviewing the basketball court, but just when it was going to be done needed to be decided. Park Projects Manager Kullander recommended maybe doing it next summer when street reconstruction could be going on in the area, and it could keep the cost down if done at the same time. The commission assured her that the basketball court was receiving serious consideration and to maintain contact with the commission. DISCUSSION OF VANDALISM IN THE PARKS Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander introduced Police Chief Dennis Delmont. Chief Delmont passed out a synopsis of calls relating to police calls to the parks (attached). Chief Delmont said he thought there wasn't a serious problem with crime in the parks. In the yearly synopsis the overall picture is 14 calls in one year. There have been a cluster of calls at Mendakota Park and Valley Park. These calls have been mainly for vandalism and five individuals had been charged with vandalism and property damage related to graffiti at Marie Park. Commissioner Damberg said she was at a seminar in another part of town and overheard people talking about Valley Park that people were lighting fires and throwing burning logs onto dried grass and that some people fear encountering these type of individuals in the parks. 1 Police Chief Delmont responded that the biggest criminal type of activity in the city is vandalism. The police department has responded to eight police calls regarding vandalism. There was a fifth degree assault in January between a rink attendant and a skater. He also stated that people don't call the police and the police department can't do anything unless called. The Police Department has arrested a couple of people who were having a beer party in a park. The officer saw a large amount of cars in the park's parking lot and checked it out. There were about 20 teens in the park drinking beer and nobody called the police to complain. Chief Delmont stated that the police department do patrol the parks, but not on a regular basis. The squad cars can drive on the trails, but he does not like that to be done because you can't see who is walking or rollerblading around a curve or over a hill. Officers are directed not to drive on the trails when in use unless responding to a police call. Chief Delmont recommended putting up signage saying "If you see something suspicious call the Police Department at this number", he would try to get an copy of what the St. Paul Parks Department uses for signage. He also suggested getting the citizens involved. Maybe talk to the reporter at the Sun Newspaper and put something in the City newsletter to make popple aware of how nice the parks and trails are and if they see or hear anything suspicious to call the police. He went on to say active parks have less criminal activity than passive parks. Commissioner Damberg stated she was concerned about the dollar amounts being used to fix vandalized items in the parks. Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander responded that it had cost $100 per event to replace the damaged fountains at Kensington and Mendakota Parks. He went on to say that the reason why this hasn't happened in the past is because we had no fountains in parks until the buildings were constructed in the past few years. Chief Delmont said he would try to keep the Commission updated with criminal activities with a monthly report to the Parks and Recreation Commission. Commissioner Linnell asked Chief Delmont why we have a skate boarding ordinance. Chief Delmont responded it wasn't a bad ordinance to have and he would never want to see skateboards on city streets. He went on to say the ordinance was written when skate boarding was the big thing. People came to the City Council and asked that an ordinance be created addressing the safety issues of skateboarding. VERBAL UPDATES There still being no quorum the Commission decided to go on to the verbal updates. Parks Project Manager Guy Kullander reported that the cut stones from Acacia Cemetery have been moved to Ivy Park and Kensington Park. He will be getting bids 2 soon to place the stones for retaining walls, steps and benches. He also stated they were going ahead with port a polies enclosures in two parks. Also bleacher pads are going to be installed at Kensington Park. He went on to report that they were going to close one of Kensington soccer fields, dig out low points and reseed after the sting soccer season ends in late July. Commissioner Damberg asked when the Five Year 1996-2000 Capital Improvement Plan was due. Parks Project Manager Kullander responded the budget was being worked on now and that the 1996 improvements listed in the draft five year plan included in the agenda packet would be submitted. He suggested that the 1995 project to switch two warming houses, estimated to cost about $6000, be moved to 1996. Since the Commission, in the 1995-1995 five year plan, proposed to construct a shelter and other improvements in Wentworth Park it seemed appropriate that replacing or enlarging the warming house should be done at the same time. He also said that residents, that will attend the open house for comments on the picnic shelter location and improvements, may also have concerns regarding the skating rinks and warming house. The Commissioners present all agreed this was an appropriate suggestion. Parks Project Manager Kullander reported that bids to raise the backstops at Mendakota Park would be in on July 13 and presented to Council on July 18. He thought the cost would be $8 to $10,000. Funds would come from the Special Park Fund for this improvement. Commissioner Damberg said she thought $8,000 was expensive. Parks Project Manager Kullander then explained that the extended back stops will stop balls going into the upper deck where foul balls have hit spectators. The existing 16 foot high backstop will be extended ten feet. Commissioner Damberg said she would not be able to attend the August meeting as she will be out of town. There being no quorum, the commission adjourned at 7:15 P.M. Commissioner Libra arrived at 7:25 P.M. The meeting was not continued due to lack of a quorum. Commissioner Kleinglass had to leave for another engagement. Respectfully Submitted, Nancy Bauer Administrative Secretary 3 Park Activity Rpt 6/94 - 6/95 Park All Calls Mendakota Park 1 6 Scenic Overlook 1 2 Valley Park 9 Wentworth Park 8 Friendly Hills 8 Marie Park 7 Rogers Lake 6 Ivy Falls Park 3 All Others 1 3 TOTAL CALLS 8 2 NON CRIMINAL -62 NON MH PARKS -6 TOTAL CRIMES RPTD IN MH PARKS 1 4 VANDALISM, PrDam Mendakota Marie Valley Total 3 3 2 Page 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TREASURER'S REPORT, JUNE, 1995 DAKOTA, INC. Checking Account 1.05% Savings account 2.15% C.D. Rep. 3.00% Collateral - Bonds Gov't Guar. CHEROKEE STATE BANK Saving Cert. 8/22/95 @ 3.60% Collateral - Bonds Gov't. Guar. Bank Acc. 6.16% Due 8/17/95 FHLMC 7.23% 12/97 FBS 6.40% FNMA 6.3% 12/97/95 FBS 5.95% FHL Mtg. Pool 8% (PRU) FMLC 7% Mtg. Pool (PRU) PAC FMLC 6 1/4% Mtg. Pool (PRU) FNMA 6% Pool (PRU) FHLMC 6% Pool @ 101.4375 (PRU) FNMA (1994 Pool) 6 1/2% (PRU) U.S. Treasury Money Mkt. (FBS) Gov't Securities Fund Zero Cpn T. Bds 7.9% - 2011 (J & M) TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE Funds Availabe 12/3194 Funds Available 6/30/94 BALANCE $11,304.81 $582.70 0.00 $11,887.51 $500,000.00 $100,000.00 $13.952.59 $13,952.59 $500,000.00 $100,000.00 $484,514.44 $500,008.00 $500,008.00 $242,986.03 $505,000.00 $418,350.79 $503,180.34 $272,395.56 $279,306.35 $175,629.04 $1,002,470.00 $197,530.00 $5,107,218.65 $7,840,461.20 $4,688,428.00 Rates June 30 June 30 COLLATERAL $600,000.00 $600,000.00 Value 5-31-95 (est) $500,000.00 $510,000.00 $502,500.00 $245,000.00 $491,255.00 $365,000.00 $475,200.00 $265,320.00 $266,000.00 $970,000.00 $2,150,000.00 $276,000.00 Money Bank FBS Market 3.00% 5.69% D 4 NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY CABLE COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 5845 Blaine Avenue Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55076-1401 612/450-9891 FAX 612/450-9429 TDD 612/552-9675 TO: MEMORANDUM City Mayors and Administrators/Clerks: - Inver Grove Heights - Lilydale - Mendota - Mendota Heights / - South St. Paul - Sunfish Lake - West St. Paul rROM: Jodie Miller, Executive Direct DATE: 7 July 1995 RE: NDC4 MEETING MINUTES & AGENDA Enclosed are copies of the UNAPPROVED minutes from the June 7th NDC4 Commission meeting. Please distribute copies of these minutes to your city council members. Also enclosed is a copy of the Agenda for the next full Commission meeting on Thursday, July 13, 1995. Please feel free to contact me at 450-9891 with questions or comments regarding any cable issues. Encs. UNAPPROVED Northern Dakota County Cable Communications Commission Full Commission Meeting June 7, 1995 1. Call to Order/Pledge: Motion 6-7-95-1 to authorize Jodelle Ista to chair the meeting was made by M. Sokol, seconded by P. Pieper, and unanimously carried. The June 7, 1995 NDC4 meeting was called to order by Acting Chair Jodelle Ista at 7:15 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Members Present: Lucille Collins, Henry Hovey, Jodelle Ista, Laurence Jung, John O'Brien Paul Pieper, Mike Sokol, and James Sullivan. Members Absent: Alvin Boelter, John Huber, John Lagoo, James Levy, George Tourville, and Richard Vitelli. Others Present: Brian Grogan (NDC4 legal counsel); Fran Zeuli (Continental Cablevision); and Jodie Miller (staff). Acting Chair Ista introduced and welcomed James Sullivan the newly -appointed Citizen Representative from the City of Sunfish Lake. 2. Adopt Agenda - Motion 6-7-95-2 to adopt the Agenda as submitted was made by P. Pieper, seconded by J. O'Brien, and unanimously carried. 3. Consent Agenda - Motion 6-7-95-3 to approve the Consent Agenda as submitted was made by M. Sokol, seconded by J. O'Brien, and unanimously carried. 4. NDCTV Update - J. Miller reminded Commissioners of the NDCTV Strategic Planning session that will take place on Saturday, June 11th beginning at 9:00 a.m. All Commissioners are welcome and encouraged to attend. NDCTV has been approached by Health East about Health East's interest in purchasing the land the facility now sits on in order to build a medical campus in Inver Grove Heights. At a meeting last week Health East representatives indicated they would be open to discussing relocating the NDC4/NDCTV facility in order to obtain the land. A purchase agreement was submitted by Health East; however, NDCTV must now investigate actual costs to relocate the facility. M. Sokol clarified that although NDCTV holds title to the building and land, NDC4 and the member cities will ultimately make any decisions regarding NDC4 Commission Meeting UNAPPROVED June 7, 1995 disposition of the building and/or land. NDC4 may wish to investigate the offer on behalf of member cities by forming a committee, which could involve NDCTV. Motion 6-7-95-4 to form a committee to investigate the Health East purchase agreement _ and make recommendations to the full Commission who may then inform member cities was made by M. Sokol and seconded by J. O'Brien. Discussion followed during which it was agreed that NDCTV would be encouraged to provide input in the form of members on this joint committee. A question was raised about conflict of interest for Commissioners who may sit on the committee who also represent the City of Inver Grove Heights which has an interest in selling land to Health East for the same medical campus project. B. Grogan explained that although the city Commission representatives may not have a personal financial interest in the project, the city they represent does. If there is a strong desire to serve on the committee by these representatives, they should place the NDC4 Chair on notice in writing of a potential conflict of interest so the issue can be discussed and resolved by the full Commission. Other comments were offered regarding the need for a committee to be formed. It was pointed out that the member cities will likely look to NDC4 for answers to numeroug questions raised by this offer and the most expedient manner in which to investigate the issues would be through a committee. The vote was taken and the motion unanimously carried. Composition of the committee was discussed. Motion 6 -7 -9S -S to appoint the Negotiation Committee (consisting of L. Collins, J. Ista, J. O'Brien, M. Sokol, and R. Vitelli) to investigate the Health East offer was made by J. O'Brien and seconded by M. Sokol. Brief discussion followed. B. Grogan pointed out that action between NDC4 and NDCTV regarding this matter will need to be defined. The vote was taken and the motion was unanimously carried. It was the consensus of the Commission to invite NDCTV to provide input at committee meetings pertaining to the Health East issue. M. Sokol will work with J. Miller on establishing meeting dates and communications. 5. Citizen Comments - A caller inquired why programs she produced at the NDCTV facility played back so poorly on the access channel. J. Miller and F. Zeuli responded by explaining that there could be numerous reasons for the buzzing that appears on the tape and when this happens, the NDCTV staff should be notified right away. J. Miller further explained that a joint meeting was held with NDCTV and Continental staff to discuss playback problems and equipment in order to find solutions to many of the playback problems that have occurred, including this one. 6. Continental Report - Continental Representative, F. Zeuli briefly reviewed Continental's proposed system upgrade for which Continental requests a seven-year extension to the Franchise Ordinance. Building this "fiber to feeder" system would provide a platform that Page - 2 NDC4 Commission Meeting UNAPPROVED June 7, 1995 would allow future voice and data delivery, making the NDC system one of the more sophisticated in the country. Continental would like to receive direction from the Commission soon in regard to this issue. On another matter. F. Zeuli reported that during discussions of the "Social Contract" it was indicated by NDC4 that it would be desirable for NDC subscribers to receive the same in- kind refund options being offered to St. Paul subscribers. Continental anticipates being able to make the in-kind refund options available to NDC subscribers pending closure of the FCC reply comment period, possibly late August to early September. Recently, Continental was able to arrange for a documentary on hand gun usage produced by HBO to be shown on KTCA followed by a town meeting. The event was very well received at a local level and recognized nationally. Lorraine Palkert. a South St. Paul school teacher, wrote a lesson plan based on the event which will be shown in Twin Cities schools after receiving copyright clearance from HBO. Lorraine Palkert was recently honored for the second time, with a national award presented to teachers who utilize cable as an educational tool in the classroom. L. Palkert is very highly regarded on a national level for her innovative use of cable in teaching students. The NDC cable store has relocated from Marie Avenue to Signal Hills Mall. In November, Continental will celebrate 10 years of providing cable service in the NDC area. To fulfill certain obligations of the Citivision Agreement, Continental is putting together a weekly sports program utilizing the NDC studio. The program "Out of Left Field" will feature hosts Mike Veeck, owner of the St. Paul Saints baseball team and Mike Augustin, St. Paul Pioneer Press sports writer who will profile a national sports celebrity on each program, followed by regional/local interviews, and a roundtable discussion. The commercial -free version of the program will play back on NDC Access Channel 33; and a commercial version will, hopefully, be released for statewide playback. Production of the program is anticipated to begin the end of June. H. Hovey inquired about how the system rebuild to 750 Mhz.. will affect Continental's ability to compete with the satellite industry. F. Zeuli responded that the change will make Continental one of the most competitive systems in the country along with improving picture quality, reliability, and channel capacity. J. Ista inquired whether the community may anticipate more boxes appearing on easement property such as the box in South St. Paul. F. Zeuli replied that he was not certain how many Optical Transition Nodes (OTN) would be required, but he will find out and report back. J. Miller inquired what type of arrangement Continental hoped to negotiate with NDC4 in exchange for rebuilding the system. F. Zeuli responded that Continental hopes to effect extension language that would not bind either NDC4 or Continental to something that would not naturally run its course under the current Franchise Ordinance. B. Grogan explained that such a change would involve an amendment to the Franchise and that the Page - 3 NDC4 Commission Meeting UNAPPROVED June 7, 1995 Joint Powers Agreement would need to be in place before discussions affecting the Franchise Ordinance beyond the year 2000 take place. The pros and cons of the rebuild and Franchise Ordinance changes need to be discussed. II/lotion 6-7-95-6 to authorize the Executive Committee to look at the issue of early renewal or Franchise Ordinance extension and report back to the full Commission at its July meeting was made by J. O'Brien, seconded by L. Jung, and unanimously carried. B. Grogan suggested that the committee focus on and be prepared to advise the Commission whether there is interest in considering changes to the Franchise Ordinance in exchange for rebuilding the system. M. Sokol inquired about the backlog of orders for converter boxes, the status of the digital cable radio service, and changes to Channel 43 service. F. Zeuli responded that the backlog of orders for converter boxes has cleared. Equipment needs to be delivered before installing the radio service. In order to save on costs, notification of changes in the radio service and Channel 43 will occur at the same time and be sent approximately 60 days prior to the change over. It is anticipated the changes will occur in late September or early October. L. Collins asked about theft of converter boxes. F. Zeuli responded that theft is an ongoing issue that requires prosecution of both users of illegal boxes and sellers of those boxes. The newer boxes are, however, more theft -proof than the older versions. J. Miller inquired about the increase in the second quarter Franchise Fee payment. F. Zeuli explained that most of the increase is due to the growth in subscribership in the NDC area. Part also may be attributed to an interconnect payment delayed from 1994. J. Miller noted that a statement is made on Continental's Annual Report that indicates no financial statements will be provided for the NDC system. The dissolution of the NDC name has been an issue discussed the past two years. F. Zeuli was asked to follow-up on the issue. 7. Staff Report - Executive Director: J. Miller explained that the full Commission may need to meet in July in order to approve 1996 budgets which need to be sent to member cities by August 1. Motion 6-7-95-7 to hold full Commission meetings until further notice in order to take care of some of the important issues requiring action by the Commission was made by L. Collins and seconded by P. Pieper. Discussion followed in which it was explained that determining now to hold full Commission meetings will allow Commissioners to plan well in advance and be prepared to attend meetings. The vote was taken and the motion ' unanimously carried. It was the consensus of Commissioners present to hold the next full Commission meeting on Thursday, July 13. Page - 4 NDC4 Commission Meeting UNAPPROVED June 7, 1995 The League of Minnesota Cities and MACTA have requested donations from cities and cable commissions to help defray costs incurred while trying to provide state telecommunications legislation that would benefit cities. J. Miller noted that some local commissions have contributed money on behalf of their member cities. and recommended NDC4 also make a contribution. Discussion followed and it was agreed that since money was not budgeted in 1995 for this expense it would be more appropriate to include such a donation in the 1996 budget review process which will eventually be reviewed by member cities. J. Miller will advise the LMC and IvLACTA that NDC4 is unable to make a donation at this time. Adjusted subscriber numbers calculated for member cities have been distributed to Commissioners. Options for the proposed city news show will be discussed at the Strategic Planning session on Saturday. F. Zeuli has indicated Continental supports the idea and will commit $5.000 toward the effort if NDC4 can collect $15,000. J. Miller will advise member cities that have committed funding toward* the news show that a concept on how to continue with producing the show will be forthcoming. 8. Legal Counsel Report: B. Grogan recommended that the Commission adopt an Accounting Order which will neither approve nor dissapprove rates charged by Continental for basic service and related equipment but will preserve the Commission's right to reconsider rates at a later date should a need arise. Motion 6-7-95-8 to adopt the Accounting Order Resolution No. 6-7-1995 was made by H. Hovey, seconded by M. Sokol, and unanimously carried. 9. Unfinished Business: No new business was brought up for discussion. 10. New Business: J. Ista requested to be replaced on the Negotiating Committee since she also serves on the Executive Committee that will become more active. Laurence Jung volunteered to replace J. Ista on the Negotiation Committee. The following portion of the meeting took place in a closed session: 11. Personnel Matters: Personnel evaluations for the Executive Director, Administrative Assistant, and Government Coordinator had been completed and mailed to Commissioners prior to this meeting along with recommendations for action. Motion 6-7-95-9 to approve a 4% salary increase effective 1/1/95 for the Executive Director was made by M. Sokol, seconded by P. Pieper, and unanimously carried. Motion 6-7-95-10 to approve a 3% salary increase effective 5/1/95 for the Administrative Assistant, and a 3% salary increase effective 4/18/95 for the Government Coordinator was made by J. O'Brien, Paye -5 NDC4 Commission Meeting UNAPPROVED June 7, 1995 seconded by L. Collins, and unanimously carried. These salary increases were included in the 1995 budget. The staff proposal to use a portion of budgeted money to partially fill the part-time position which has been vacant since December was brought forward for discussion. By hiring one of the independent contractors as an employee up to 24 hours per week, there would still be approximately $6,000 in the 1995 budget to hire a part-time clerk/receptionist to help out with increased staff clerical work loads. Money for these proposed additions are in the 1995 budget. Motion 6-7-95-11 to approve hiring the independent contractor for up to 24 hours per week and use the remaining budgeted money to hire a part-time clerical person was made by P. Pieper, seconded by J. O'Brien, and unanimously carried. 12. Adjournment: Motion 6-7-95-12 to adjourn the meeting was made by H. Hovey and seconded by M. Sokol. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. •• Respectfully submitted, Joy A. Curtin NDC4 Administrative Assistant and Recording Secretary Page - 6 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 12, 1995 TO: FROM: Mayor, City Council and City Administrate/ James E. Daniels Public Works Direc SUBJECT: Water Tower Reconditioning Update DISCUSSION: The Water Tower Reconditioning Project was scheduled to be completed July 15, 1995. It appears as if the contractor will be close to meeting that deadline (see the attached schedule from MSA, our engineer). This MSA schedule is optimistic and assumes good weather, should we have a period of rain, the schedule would slip. We are intending to do a press release once the tower is back in service announcing its completion and lifting the sprinkling ban. We will maintain an odd/even ban within the Industrial Park until we are sure the tower levels will stay up. ACTION REQUIRED: For information only. JED: dfw JUL-13-95 THU 9:58 MSA CONSULTING ENGINEERS FAX NO. 6126449446 P,02 VISA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1326 Energy Park Drive St. Paul, MN 55108 612-644-4389 1-800-888-2923 Fax: 612-644-9446 CML ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL MUNICIPAL PLANNING SOLID WASTE STRUCTURAL SURVEYING TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION ELECTRICAL/MECHANICAL ENGINEERING: HVAC POWER DISTRIBUTION SCADA SYSTEM CONTROLS OFFICES IN: MINNEAPOLIS PRIOR LAKE ST, PAUL WASECA MEMORANDUM TO: GUY KULLANDER, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FROM: JOHN HEMMING SUBJECT: WATER TOWER RECONDITIONING MSA FILE: 118-001-40 _ DATE: JULY 12, 1995 The interior wet surfaces of the tank and riser were completed on July 10, 1995. Before the water tower is filled, interior dry surfaces and exterior surfaces that are susceptible to condensation must be completed and cured. In addition, the interior surfaces must be disinfected with a chlorine solution. TMI currently has three crews working on the water tower. Their projected date for completing the water tower to the point at which it can be filled is July 19, 1995. I contacted the St. Paul Water Utility to find out how long it will take to fill the tank. It appears that one or two days will be required, depending on the water demand when the tank is filled. After the tank is filled, a water sample will be tested for bacteriological quality. The bacteriological testing normally takes 48 hours. After the tank is filled and in service, approximately two weeks will be required for TMI to fully complete the project. In summary, the projected completion schedule is as follows: Begin filling tank: Tank filled: Bacteriological test results: Water tower in service: Full project completion: July 19, 1995 July 21, 1995 July 23, 1995 July 24, 1995 August 4, 1995 Feel free to contact me at 644-4389 with any questions about this project. JRH:tw 001-1210.jul CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini FROM: Paul R. Berg 9 : R. r� Code Enforcement Officer July 11, 1995 SUBJECT: Sign Face Change at 1960 Dodd Road, Finamart/Fina DISCUSSION: Fina Mart wishes to change their existing signage to their new name Oasis Market. The previously approved Finamart/Fina ,signs are proposed to reflect the name change to Oasis Market. They are not adding any additional signage so the square footage will not be increased. The three existing signs to be changed are as follows: Two signs on the building sign band which are 3' X 15' = 45 square feet The sign face on the pylon sign is 5' X 5' = 25 square feet. RECOMMENDATION: Staff would recommend the City Council approved the requested sign permit for the sign face change from Finamart/Fina to Oasis Market. ACTION REQUIRED: If City Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation to approve the requested sign permit, it should pass a motion approving the sign face change for the pylon and sign band signage. PRB: dfw 5 . T. H. 110 228.81 S.89°44'25"E. S90 3, Mh 40 h 0 Mendota Heights Police Department MEMORANDUM July 12, 1995 TO: Mayor and City C City Administ FROM: Dennis Delmont Chief of Police Subject: Retirement Notification and Request for Authorization to Hire Introduction The police department requests the authority to make a contingent offer of employment to fill an impending vacancy. History Officer Floyd Arndt, who has served many years as a Mendota Heights police officer, has announced by the attached letter that he intends to retire from service to the city as of July 31, 1995. As a result of Officer Arndt's retirement, it is necessary that we move immediately to hire a replacement. Our first step in that process will be to contact the oral interview board and discuss those applicants remaining on our list in an effort to determine if viable candidates exist. At that point, we will make a decision to re - advertise and test or to utilize an existing candidate. Floyd Arndt first became a member of the Mendota Heights Police Department on 9/1/63 and has served the city well for almost 33 years. Although his retirement is not totally unexpected, the specific date is a bit of a surprise. Recommendation I recommend that the council accept Officer Arndt's resignation and commend him for the many years of service to the City of Mendota Heights. I further request that Council authorize the police department to begin the process of replacing Officer Arndt. July 12, 1995 Chief Dennis Delmont, Please accept this letter of termination from the Mendota Heights Police Department. My last day of employment, prior to my retirement, will be July 31,1995. Thank you, ricio Floyd Arndt CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ SUBJECT: Public Works Department Labor Agreement July 13, 1995 INTRODUCTION Our current two year labor agreement with our eight public works maintenance workers expired on December 31, 1994. Council will recall that in October, 1994 we met in a workshop session to discuss acceptable contract settlement parameters. Negotiatiorts for a new contract began in late 1994, were temporarily put on hold in early 1995, and were recently revived with the arrival of a new Teamsters business agent, Joe Morris, who took over the duties from the recently departed Larry Bastian. Jim Danielson and I met with Mr. Morris and Parks Leadperson Terry Blum on Monday of this week, and I am pleased to report that the negotiations have been successfully concluded. On Tuesday we were informed by Business Agent Morris that the bargaining unit membership had voted to approve the proposed contract. Council is now being asked to ratify the proposed settlement. DISCUSSION As noted above, our most recent public works department labor contract ran for a term of two years. We have enjoyed great success with the two year contract as it minimizes the amount of time spent annually on labor negotiations. Recently Council approved a similar two year contract for our police patrol officers bargaining unit. Based on input received from the Council during the labor negotiations, the terms of settlement were to be kept within specific defined parameters. In terms of wages, it is proposed that hourly rates be increased by three percent in 1995 and by three percent in 1996. These increases are consistent with those approved for non-union City employees in 1995, and for police patrol officers in both 1995 and 1996. In terms of employee health insurance, it is proposed that the City's 1995 contribution towards coverage be increased $16.00 per month, bringing the total monthly contribution to $340.00 per employee. The need for this increase is related to the ever escalating health insurance premiums imposed by our health plan provider. The City Council previously approved an identical 1995 increase for all non-union City employees and our police patrol officers. For 1996, it is proposed that our public works employees receive a health insurance contribution equal to whatever amount the City Council provides to other non-union City employees at that time. RECOMMENDATION I believe this proposed settlement package accomplishes all of the objectives set forth by the City Council for this particular round of contract negotiations. The proposed settlement is within our established settlement parameters and adequate funds are available in the adopted 1995 budget to implement this contract settlement. The revised contract language has been accepted by the Bargaining Unit, and I strongly recommend that the City Council ratify the outlined terms of settlement. ACTION REQUIRED Should Council concur with my recommendation, a motion to approve the 1995-1996 Labor Contract Settlement as described above between the City of Mendota Heights and Teamsters Local No. 320 should be considered. In addition, the Mayor, City Administrator and City Clerk should be authorized to execute a formal labor contract document which incorporates the described contract revisions. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 12, 1995 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrat FROM: James E. Daniel Public Works Dir SUBJECT: Approval of Final Plat for Ivy Falls South DISCUSSION: At their June 6, 1995 meeting, Council approved Mr. Keith Heaver's request for a preliminary plat for Ivy Falls South (see attached letter of notification). All the terms and conditions listed within the notification letter have been agreed to by Mr. Heaver within a signed Developer's Agreement which is also attached. Mr. Heaver is making plans to begin the site grading as soon as he can arrange for it after final plat approval. He petitioned the City for the public improvements earlier and staff is currently beginning the plans and specifications in anticipation of installing the utilities later this fall. RECOMMENDATION: The final plat as submitted conforms to the preliminary plat as approved at the June 6, 1995, City Council meeting and I recommend that it be approved. ACTION REQUIRED: If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 95- , RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR IVY FALLS SOUTH. JED:dfw City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota RESOLUTION NO. 95 - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR IVY FALLS SOUTH WHEREAS, a final plat for Ivy Falls South has been submitted to the Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed said final plat. NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, as follows: 1. That the fmal plat of Ivy Falls South submitted at this meeting is hereby approved. 2. That the appropriate City officials be and they are hereby authorized to execute the fmal plat on behalf of the City of Mendota Heights. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this 18th day of July, 1995. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor ATTEST: Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk City of Ult� Mendota Heights June 13, 1995 Mr. Keith Heaver Heaver Design and Construction, Inc. 875 Mendakota Court Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Dear Mr. Heaver: I am writing to formally notify you that the City Council, at their June 6, 1995 meeting voted to approve a Preliminary Plat for Ivy Falls South, based on revised plans dated May 31, 1995 on file in Planning Case No. 95-03. There were a number of conditions and terms of approval for this preliminary plat. It will be necessary to enter into a Developer's Agreement to formally document these terms and conditions of approval. The terms and conditions of approval are: 1. The developer agrees to extend the storm sewer catch basins proposed on Ivy Lane, in a westerly direction towards Cherry Hills, as far as is feasible. 2. The developer agrees to a twenty four foot (24') width for proposed Ivy Lane, subject to City Engineering approval. 3. The developer agrees to limit the height of proposed single family homes on Lot 17, Block 1 and Lot 18, Block 1 to one (1) story homes through deed restrictions. 4. The developer agrees to limit the height of proposed single family home on Lot 1, Block 2 to a story and a half (1 1/2) through deed restrictions. 5. The developer agrees to pay for the extension of Ivy Lane from Ivy Falls South to Cherry Hills Road. 6. The developer agrees to limit the home width in Ivy Falls South to a maximum of eighty four feet (84') through deed restrictions. 7. The developer agrees to install landscaping, including berms and evergreen plantings, along the boundary with Cherry Hills Addition, as proposed on plans dated 5-31-95 and submitted to City Council on 6-6-95. 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850 Mr. Keith Heaver June 13, 1995 Page two 8. The developer agrees to deed restrictions that prohibit the alteration of the berms and swale elevations on those lots adjoining Cherry Hills addition by any future owners, successors or assigns. Attached is a proposed Developer's Agreement prepared by the City Engineer based upon the City Council approval of the Preliminary Plat. This document needs to be signed and returned to James Danielson, Public Works Director. Your next step is to prepare and submit a Final Plat for review by City staff. It is also necessary for you to submit a petition for Public Improvements and a Trail Easement document that will need to be filed with the Final Plat. If you have any questions regarding the final plat, the developer's agreement, public improvements, and the trail easement, please contact Jim Danielson at 452-1850. Sincerely, Kevin Batchelder Administrative Assistant cc: James Danielson, Public Works Director CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA CONTRACT FOR SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this /7+k day of , 1995 by and between the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, r called the "City") and Heaver Design and Construction, Inc., 875 Mendakota Court, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (hereinafter called the "Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer proposes a plat for a eighteen (18) lot single family development in Mendota Heights to be known as Ivy Falls South, consisting of 8.7 acres located south of the south terminus of Knollwood Lane in Mendota Heights, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, public services are needed by the Developer from Mendota Heights in order to proceed with said development; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agrccd by and between the two parties as follows: 1. Developer will petition the City for needed public improvements (Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermains and Streets. Developer agrees to pay $2,700.00 escrow to the City as per Ordinance No. 301. Escrow to be used to fund any City costs incurred that can not be recovered by assessments,.. remaining escrow will be refunded upon successful completion of the project. 2. Developer will provide at no cost to the City all needed temporary construction easements to install said improvements and those permanent right-of-way and utility and drainage easements, necessary for said public improvements. 3. Developer will proceed immediately to commission a registered land surveyor to place and maintain enough lot comers so that street centerlines and all utilities can be located by City Staff. 4. Developer agrees to grade site and place minimum basement elevations according to the grading plan dated May 31, 1995 and protect the environment by establishing and keeping in place erosion controls at all times. Minimum erosion control requirements will consist of top dressing, seeding and mulching of disturbed areas within 30 days of site work completion. The Developer agrees that he will satisfy all State requirements for a grading permit. 5. Developer acknowledges that the park contribution due to the City as per Ordinance 301, Section 6, as amended by Resolution 92-94, will be the dedication of a trail easement adjacent to the south lot lines of Lots 10 and 12 and the construction of an eight (8) foot wide bituminous trail. Owners of the lots abutting the trail will be responsible for establishing and maintaining a lawn adjacent to the trail, the Developer will be responsible for notifying these homeowners of this responsibility. 6. As part of the grading operations, the Developer shall stockpile 1,000 cubic yards of topsoil for use by the City in boulevard and easement restoration. 7. If and when there is an excessive buildup of mud or dirt on existing City streets as a result of grading or building operations, the Developer shall have the affected streets swept by mechanical means, at the direction of the City, should the Developer fail to comply with a City request, the City will order the work done and its cost will be deducted from the Developer's escrow. 8. No occupancy of any building in said plat shall occur until street access, water and sanitary sewer improvements have been installed, inspected and accepted by the City and by St. Paul Water Utility and are available for use. 9. The developer agrees to fund extension of storm sewer catch basins on Ivy Lane, in a westerly direction towards Cherry Hills, as far as is feasible. 10. The developer agrees to a twenty four foot (24') bituminous width for Ivy Lane. 11. The developer agrees to limit the height of proposed single family homes on Lot 17, Block 1 and Lot 18, Block 1 to one (1) story homes through deed restrictions. 12. The developer agrees to limit the height of proposed single family home on Lot 1, Block 2 to a story and a half (1 1/2) through deed restrictions. 13. The developer agrees to fund the extension of Ivy Lane from Ivy Falls South to Cherry Hills Road, restoration of disturbed lawns shall be with sod and trees shall be planted to replace the large maple to be removed. 14. The developer agrees to limit the home width in Ivy Falls South to a maximum of eighty four feet (84') through deed restrictions. 15. The developer agrees to install landscaping, including berms and evergreen plantings, along the boundary with Cherry Hills Addition, as shown on plans dated 5-31-95 and submitted to City Council on 6-6-95. 16. The developer agrees to deed restrictions that prohibit the alteration of the berms and swale elevations on those lots adjoining Cherry Hills addition by any future owners, successors or assigns. 17. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the Developers, their successors and/or permitted assigns, of the property described herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement shall not be assignable by Developers to any third party. 18. In the event that the City initiates litigation to enforce performance of Developer's _ obligations hereunder, the City shall be entitled to reimbursement of all costs and attorney fees incurred in connection therewith, whether incurred prior to or after entry of judgement. CITY OF MENDOTA. HEIGHTS Charles E. Mertensotto, Mayor M. Thomas Lawell, City Administrator DEVELOPER: HEAVER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, INC. By 2/' Its CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 11, 1995 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administra or SUBJECT: Mendota Heights Athletic Association T -Ball Subsidy DISCUSSION For many years the City of Mendota Heights has provided a subsidy to the Mendota Heights Athletic Association (f.k.a. Mend -Eagan Athletic Association) to assist them in running their annual youth T -Ball league. Traditionally, the City has paid to MHAA $15.00 per Mendota Heights' youth enrolled in the league. For 1995, the City budgeted $3,500.00 from the Parks and Recreation budget to cover the anticipated enrollment of approximately 230 Mendota Heights' youth. Attached please find a letter from MHAA Treasurer Norm Gellerman requesting payment for 1995. Actual enrollment in this year's T -ball program was 339 youth, of which 267 were Mendota Height's residents. Based on a per Mendota Heights' youth payment of $15.00, the total payment request for 1995 totals $4,005.00. This requested payment is $825.00 over the amount budgeted. ACTION REQUIRED Should Council wish to continue its support of the Mendota Heights Athletic Association T -ball program at the $15.00 per youth level, a motion should be made to authorize the payment of $4,005.00 to MHAA as outlined in the attached letter from MHAA Treasurer Norm Gellerman. IIVEiMendota Heights Athletic Association June 29, 1995 Tom Lawell City Administrator City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 RE: 'z' -Ball Subsidy Dear Mr. Lawell The Mendota Height Thletic Association had 339 kids who played T -Ball ina, Of.these, 267 were residents of Mendota Heights. As per our agreement with the City, MHAA hereby submits its request for payment of $4,005.00 (267 x $15.00). The Mendota Heights Athletic Association greatly appreciates the City of Mendota Heights' support in helping it provide athletic programs for the youth of our community. Please make the check payable to: MHAA 997 Stratford Road Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Very truly, 61-(Avli-e-tete-0,44,) Norm Gellerman Treasurer, MHAA LIST OF CONTRACTORS TO BE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL July 18. 1995 Concrete/Masonry Contractor License Neeck Construction Gas Piping Contractor License Residential Heating & Air, Inc. MVAC Contractor License Residential Heating & Air, Inc. Total Refrigeration Systems, Inc. General Contractors License Werni, Timm, and Associates Inc. July 18,1995 TO: Magor and City Council • CLAIMS LIST SUMMARY: Total. Claims Significant Claims Dakota Bank Hughes Costello MWCC Ryan ConstruLti on Winthrop Weinstine TMI Unusual Claims C & H Construction Dahlgren Shardlow Uban General Pump • Debt service prosecutions Sac chgs Mendota Meadows Legal water tower park improvements planning services T I payment 1,572,412.20 1,116,056.73 3,.,27.90 5,890.50 89,092.90 4,411.70 88,318.65 5,840.00 3,892.95 228,000.00 �•a i• '"' is • li 14 Jul';; 71 Cairns List =r+. «., :epi / $�95 .cy of Mendota Heil, Ternp Check Number Temp. Check Nurnber Vencor Name AT&T 1 AT&T AT&T Totals Teruo Check Number Ternp C:•7eck. Numper Account C:c 01-4210-050-50 01-4210-030-30 01-4810-070-70 lu-Mun uept 5U -loads 15-Engr 60 -Utilities 20 -Police 70 -Parks Page 1 30 -Fire 80 -Planning 40-CE0 85-Regycling 90 -Animal Control Comments Amount j u 1 svc 5. 30 Jul svc 5. 30 End qtr 14.68 25. 28 2 A B Cti' Renta:;.s 01-4200-610-50 eo rent :6.05 Totals Terrio Check Nurnber 2 Ternp Check Number 3 16.05 3 A T & T Wireless Svc 01-4210-030-3� Jul svc 20.80 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 3 Temp Check Number 4 A T & T Wireless Svcs 4 A T& T kireiess Svcs 4 A T & T :fireless Svcs 01-4210-020-20 01-4210-030-30 01-4210-030-30 12 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 4 Ternp Check Numper 5 Albinson 5 Albinson t Albinson 5 Albinson 20 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Nurnber 05-4305-105-15 05-4305-105-15 05-4305-105-15 05-4305-105-15 Jun SVC jun SVC Jun svc splys spivs solyS splys 20. 80 15.97 8.32 1.70 25. 99 7.39 16.41 69. 57 137.86 231.23 6 American National Bank 12-4226-000-00 eo cert fee 175.55 6 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 6 Ternp Check Nurnber 7 7 Barr Engineering Co 7 29-4220-834-00 11 G � •/ _�'•+' r r+r r r� �. {� T .�� ro-h�. _ ..... >,.3.. �.4_._... ,...._�_.,. cess..,.,^_. .. ..... ..:. ... .........._..,,.� �:. �. . _t re ivy falls 175.55 450. 00 450.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ...x,..+50,14. wyTM• 0,;';..r .a:.. •...,�. 14 Jul ' Claims List Pape 2 Fri 3:I, JM City of Mendota Heitm-s Temp Check Number 7 Temp. Check Number Vencor Name Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 8 Barefoot Grass Account Code 7 08-4325-000-00 8 Totals Ternp Check Number 8 Temp Check Numaer 9 9 Biffs Inc 01-4200-610-70 - Totals Temp Check Number 9 Ternp Check Numaer 10 10 Burnsville Lumber 27-4305-710-00 10 Burnsville Lumber 16-4305-717-00 20 Totals Temp Check Number 10 Temp Check Nurnber 11 11 Boland Lawn Svc 08-4335-000-00 11 Totals Temp Check Number 11 Temp Check Numaer 12 Comments Amount 6/30 svc 144.84 144..84 Jul rent 969.79 989.79 splys spiys jun svc 142.71 142.71 285.42 244.95 244.95 12 Carquest 01-4330-490-50 parts 42.62 12 Carquest 01-4330-490-70 parts 16.02 12 Carquest 01-4330-490-70 parts 7.74 12 Carquest 01-4330-460-30 parts 2.88 12 Carquest 01-4330-460-30 parts 14.64 12 Carquest 01-4330-460-30 parts 3.17 72 87.07 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 12 Temp Check Nurnber 13 13 C & H Construction 13 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 14 City Motor Supply 14 • •• 01-4330-215-70 13 01-4330-440-20 park imprs 5,840.00 5,840.00 parts 120.80 0 0 r) 0 0 0 0 0 14 Jul Claims List Fri 3:L M City of Mendota Heic,.,s Temp Check Number 14 Ternp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code 14 City Motor Supply 01-4330-490-50 14 City Motor Supply 01-4330-490-70 42 Totals Ternp Check Numner 14 Ternp Check Number 15 15 Civil Endr News 15 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Numner 16 05-4402-105-15 15 Pape 3 Comments Amount; parts 46.89 parts 46.88 214.57 renewal 18.00 18.00 16 Contact Mobile Communications 01-4330-450-30 balance 10.00 16 Contact Mobile Communications 01-4330-450-30 rprs . 50.94 16 Contact Mobile Communications 01-4330-450-30 rprs 62.50 48 I.) Totals Temp Check Number 16 Ternp Check Number 17 17 Consolidated Container Corp 01-4305-050-50 splys 208.65 1) 123.44 17 Totals Temp Check Number 17 Temp Check Number 18 18 Copy Duplicating Products 18 Copy Duplicating Products 18 Copy Duplicating Products 01-4330-490-50 01-4330-490-70 15-4330-490-60 54 Totals Temp Check Number 18 Ternp Check Number 19 19 Kevin Custer 29-4305-834-00 19 Totals Ternp Check Number 19 Temp Check Number 20 20 Coverall 20 Coverall 20 Coverall ,t,.til.64S:•;•1?-, •"*" „•'0" 5:4-*(4,3F4',11,L;E•riki'. 4"1..t.6? P , 01-4335-315-30 01-4335-310-50 01-4335-310-70 mtcn mtcn mtcn E08.65 61.00 61.00 61.00 183.00 beaver trapping 266.92 Jul svc Jul svc Jul svc 266.92 137.39 60.00 60.00 C.) :". 1Y) 14 Sul Claims List Page 4 Fri 3:4. M City of Mendota Help, Temp Check Number 20 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name • Account Code COMMentS 20 Coverall 15-4335-310-60 jul svc 80 Totals Temo Check Nun er 20 Temp Check Number 21 County Recorder 21 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 22 Cunnincham Sports 22 Totals Temp Check Number Cpn Temp Check Number 23 23 Custom Die Cuts 23 Custom Die Cuts 23 Custom Die Cuts 69 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 24 27-4490-716-00 21 01-4435-200-70 22 01-4420-050-50 01-4420-050-50 01-4420-050-50 24 Dakota County Treas-Auditor 01-4490-110-10 24 Totals Temp Check Number 24 Ternp Check Number 75 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 26 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank !;. 01-4221-135-80 01-4220-133-80 01-4221-135-80 25 01-2115 01-1290 01-2115 01-1290 jun svc recr slys sions signs sions Amount 59.99 317.36 39.00 39.00 306.21 306.21 17.31 68.20 88.20 193.71 bonding cert 150.00 may retainer may svc jun retainer princ princ princ princ • 150.00 1,527.27 889.32 1,476.36 3,892.95 265,000.00 265,000.00cr 150,000.00 150,000.00cr (:) 0 0 0 e.) • 14 Jul 7--� Fri Temp Check Number 26 Temp' Check Number Vendor Name 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank 26 Dakota Bank . Claims List . City of nendpta Heie. s Account Code 14-4455-000-00 25 -*455-000-00 14 -*456-000-00 e5-+456-000-00 m1 -u115 m1-12sm 88 -+*55-000-00 36-4456-000-00 312 Totals Temp Check Number 26 Temp Caeck Number 27 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank 27 Dakota Bank --- 324 Tntals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 28 35-4456-000-00 11-4456-000-00 11-4455-000-00 37-4455-000-00 29-4455-000-00 37-4456-000-00 29-4456-000-00 m1-2115 01-1290 25-4456-000-00 25-4455-000-00 74-4456-200-00 �r Page 5 Comments Amount 77 bonds 77 bonds 77 bonds 77 bonds princ princ 92 impr bonds 91 bonds 89 bonus 90 bonds 90 bonds 94 bonus 94 bonds 94 bonuS 94 bonds brine princ 78 bonds 78 bonds 85 bonus 28 Dakota Bank mw 86 bonds ea Dakota Bank 86 bonus 28 Dakota Bank 4e-4456-000-00 88 bonds 28 Dakota Bank 4e-4455-000-00 88 bonds 28 Dakota Bank 11-4456-000-00 91 bonds 28 Dakota Bank 11-4455-000-00 91 bonds -__ 1sa ; Totals Temp Check Number 28 Temp Check Number 29 29 Dakota County Tech Inst 01-4400-0e0-20 29 Totals � s r emp Check Number 29 Temp Check Number 30 30 Danko Emgcy Ed '45' 4m���n 01-4305-030-30 trng splys • 29,200.00 1w,amm'mm 1,898.00 702.00 40,000.00 40,000,00cr 70,040.00 24,016.25 136,656.25 33,420.00 55,770.00 50,000.00 7,740.00 22,260.00 13,549.30 oa,sa7-4o 270,000.00 270,000,00cr 870.00 30,000.00 15,015.00 267,591.73 41,475'mw 150,000.00 55,037.50 220,000.00 28,737.50 o5,mmm'mm 510,250.00 455.00 455.00 34.00 ����w� r~ 0 �l (} 0 (} 0 (l 14 Jul Fri 3;k, 4/1 City of Mendota Heights Claims List Temp Check Number 30 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code Comments 30 Danko Empcy Eb 01-4330-460-30 60 Totals Ternc Check Number 30 Temp Check Number 31 31 Electro Watchman 31 Electro Watchman 31 Electro Watchman 01-4330-490-50 01-4330-490-70 15-4330-490-60 93 Totals Temp Check Number 31 Temp Check Number 32 Egan, Co 32 rprs 3rd qtr 3rd qtr 3rd qtr 01-1210 oil 32 Totals Ternp Check Number 32 Ternp Check Number 33 • Pape 6 Amount 61.77 95.77 88.40 88.40 88.39 265.19 219.07 219.07 33 Field Men 01-4330-460-30 parts 41.09 33 Totals Temp Check Number 33 Ternp Check Number 34 First Trust 34 35-4226-000-00 34 Totals Temp Check Number 34 Temp Check Number 35 35 F 8 S Capitol Mkt Grp 35 F E S Capitol Mkt Grp 70 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 36 36 General Pump Co 36 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 37 01-4490-110-10 01-4490-110-10 35 16-4473-000-00 36 37 Globe Printing & Supplies 01-4300-020-20 • svc cno svc chp svc chi 41.09 344.88 344.88 35.00 18.00 53.00 ti agreement 228,000.00 splys 228,000.00 71.12 14 Jul Fri 3:I, )M Temp Check Number 37 Claims List City of Mendota Heig....s 0 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code T.) 37 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 37 Temp Check Number 38 38 Goodyear Service Store 01-4330-440-20 38 Totals Temp Check Number 38 Ternp Check Number 39 39 Gopher State One Call 39 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 40 15-4210-060-60 39 40 Greenleaf Tree Svc 01-4500-050-50 40 Totals Temp Check Number 40 Temp Check Number 41 41 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 41 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 41 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 41 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 ' 41 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-030-30 41 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-050-50 41 Hdwe Hank 01-4305-050-50 287 Totals Temp Check Number 41 Ternp Check Number 42 42 Hughes & Costello 42 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber Ternp Check Number 43 43 Hoffers Inc 43 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 01-4222-120-20 42 01-4305-070-70 43 51 r4w COMMentS TIRES jun svc tree svc splys discount solys splys rtn spiys discount Pape 7 Amount 71.12 366.22 368.22 28.00 26.00 133.13 133.13 49.63 • 4.66cr 16.22 15.91 10.53cr 11.64 1. 09cr 77.12 jun pros 3,027.90 3.027.90 410.03 410.03 14 Jul Fri 3:0- dM City of Mendota E-ieiphts Temp Check Nurnber 44 Claims List Page 8. 0 Temp. Check Nurnber Vendor Name • Account Code COMMentS 44 IAFC 0i-4404-030-30 95 dues 44 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 44 Temp Check Number 45 45 1 0 S 45 1 0 45.1 0 S 45 1 0 S 45 1 0 S 45 1 0 45 I 0 S 451 0 S 45 I 0 S 01-4330-490-10 Jul mtcn 01-4330-460-30 Jul mtcn 01-4330-445-40 Jul mtcn 01-4330-490-50 Jul mtcn 01-4330-490-70 Jul mtcn 15-4330-490-60 Jul mtcn 05-4330-490-15 Jul mtcn 01-4490-109-09 Jul mtcn 01-4300-080-80 Jul mtcn 405 Totals Ternp Check Number 45 Ternp Check Number 46 46 Independent Black Dirt Co 01-4337-050-50 46 Independent Black Dirt Co 15-4330-490-60 92 Totals Temp Check Number 46 splys' splys 1 Amount 100.00 100.00 38.60 38.60 38.60 36.60 38.60 38.60 38.60 38.60 38.52 347.32 120.00 120.00 240.00 Temp Check Number 47 47 Interstate Diesel 01-4330-490-50 carts 2.88 47 interstate Diesel 01-4330-490-50 parts 34.19 47 Interstate Diesel 01-4330-490-70 parts 34.19 47 Interstate Diesel 15-4330-490-60 parts 34.19 --- 188 Totals Ternp Check Number 47 Temp Check Nurnber 48 `• 48 Kar Products 01-4330-440-20 parts 48 Kar Products 01-4330-460-30 parts 48 Kar Products 01-4330-490-50 parts 48 Kar Products 01-4330-490-70 parts 48 Kar Products 15-4330-490-60 parts --- 240 EM Totals Temp Check Nurnber 48 Temp Check Number 49 49 Kat Keys T •-..rp • r 01-4330-440-20 rprs 105.45 144.50 144.50 144.50 144.50 144.66 722.66 84.50 Sir 14 . ul ? Claims ListF'age 9 a Fri 3:G. M City of Mendota Heigi_s Ternp Check Number 49 Ternp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code 49 Totals Temp Check Number 49 Temp Check. Number 50 Comments Amount 50 Knox Commercial Credit 08-4335-000-00 splys 50 Knox Commercial Credit 05-4305-105-15 splys 50 Knox Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70 splys 50 Kricx Commercial Credit 01-4305-070-70 spays 200 Totals Temp Crteck. Number .50 Temp Check Number 51 Thomas Knuth 51 Thomas Knuth 102 Totals Terno Check. Nwnber si Temp Check Number 52 27-4415-710-00 27-4415-716-00 51 84. 50 78.71 55.04 39. 95 98.13 311.83 exp reimb 73.95 exo reirnb • 32.19 106. 14 52 Kremer Spring & Align 01-4330-490-50 parts 22.50 52 Kremer Spring & Alian 15-4330-490-60 rprs 628.12 52 Kremer Spring & Align 01-4330-445-40 parts 181.82 52 Kremer Spring & Align 01-4330-490-70 re 502 582.64 208 1,815.08 Totals Ternp Check Number 52 Temp Check Number 53 53 L M C 1 f 53 L M C 1 106 Totals Ternp Check Number Ternp Check Number 54 54 Lagerquist Corp 54 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 55 55 Lanaula Hdwe 55 Lanaula Hdwe 110 Totals Ternp Check Number ;ROW ^}f 01-2074 01-4131-020-20 53 08-4335-000-00 54 01-4305-050-50 01-4330-490-70 55 J u_c l ins zul prem 485.85 628. 26 1,114.1i Jul svc 94.68 splys splys 94.68 51.82 43. 49 95.31 0 0 0 0 0 0 €-) 0 0 14 Jul Fri 3:0L Ternp Check Number 56 Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 56 Larsons Auto Rpr 56 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 57 57 Leef Bros 57 Leef Bros 57 Leef Bros 171 Totals Ternp Check Number Claims List City of Mendota Heights Account Code Comments 01-4330-490-70 56 01-4335-310-50 01-4335-310-70 15-4335-310-60 57 Ternp Check Number 58 58 Lillie Suburban News 01-4240-080-80 58 Totals Temp Check Number 58 Temp Check Number 59 59 Mac Warehouse 01-4300-020-20 59 Mac Warehouse 01-4300-020-20 118 Totals Temp Check Number 59 Temp Check Number 60 60 Mendota Heights Rubbish' 01-4280-310-50 60 Mendota Heights Rubbish' 01-4280-310-70 60 Mendota Hints Rubbish' 15-4280-310-60 60 Mendota Heimhts Rubbish' 01-4280-315-30 240 Totals Ternp Check Number 60 Temp Check Number 61 61 Metro Waste Control 61 Metro Waste Control 122 Totals Ternp Check Number glh Ternp Check Number 62 62 Midwest Photo Svc 62 Totals Temp Check Number 15-4448-060-60 15-3615 61 01-4305-020-20 62 Page 10 Amount rprs 170.08 jun svc jun svc jun SVC 170.08 16.10 16.10, 16.15 48.35 hrg not 35.99 • splys splys jun svc jun svc jun svc jun svc 35 99 202.95 59.85 262.80 85.40 85.40 85.38 45.20 301.38 jun sac chgs 5,950.00 jun sac chs 59.50cr jun svc 5,890.50 40.92 40.92 0 0 0 0 C) . 0 IF) 14 Jul Claire=_. List Poe 11 Fri 3:4 City of Mendota Temp Check Number 63 Ternp. Check Number Vendor Name Account Code 63 M P 6 01-4300-040-40 63 Totals Ternp Cieck Number 63 Temp Check Number 64 64 Minn Sports Federation 64 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 65 01-4435-200-70 64 65 Minnesota Teamsters Loc 320 01-2075 E5 Totals Ternp Check Number 65 Temp Check Number 66 66 Minnesota Toro Inc 66 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 67 01-4330-490-70 66 Comments Amount permits 100.11 100.1 - re softball tour 570.00 570.00 Jul dues 273.00 273. 10 • rprs & parts 1,862.21 1,862.21 67 Motor Parts Service 01-4330-440-20 par"t=� 60.22 67 Motor Parts Service 15-4330-490-60 parts 7.45 67 Motor Parts Service 01-4330-460-30 parts 38.22 201 105.89 Totals Ternp Check Number 67 Ternp Check Number 68 68 Minn Turf & Grounds Fdn 68 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 69 69 Needels Co 69 Needels Co 69 Needels Co 207 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 70 01-4400-070-70 68 01-4305-070-70 01-4305-050-50 15-4305-060-60 69 parks regr 24.00 splys splys splys 24. 00 48. 55 24.30 24. 25 97.10 0 14 Jul 1' Fri 3:0 M Ternp Check Nurnber () Temp. Check Nurnber Vendor Name 70 Claims List. City of Mendota heiur Account Code Comments 70 John Neska 01.-4400-030-30 70 John Neska 01-4415-030-30 140 Totals Ternp Check Number 70 Ternp Check Number 71 71 Nelson Radio Comm 07-4330-000-00 71 Totals Temp Check Nurnber 71 Temp Check Number 72 72 Northern State Power 01-4212-320-70 72 Northern State Power 01-4211-315-30 72 Northern State Power 01-4211-320-70 72 Northern State Power 15-4211-400-60 72 Northern State Power 01-4211-320-70 360 Totals Temp Check Number 72 Ternp Check Nurnber 73 73 Northern Air Corp 73 Totals Temp Check Nurnber Ternp Check Nurnber 74 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 74 Norwest Bank. Mpls 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 74 Norwest Bank. Mpis 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 74 Norwest Bank Mpis 74 Norwest Bank.Mpls 74 Norwest Bank Mpls 08-4335-000-00 73 ff conf ff conf JU1 rnt cn J u 1. svc Jui svc Jul svc Jul svc Jul svc• rprs 31-4456-000-00 87 bonds 25-4456-000-00 79 bonds 11-4456-000-00 92 park bonds 11-4455-000-00 92. park bonds 37-4455-000-00 92 irnpr bonds 37-4456-000-00 92 irnpr 88-4456-000-00 92 irnpr bonds 11-4226-000-00 svc fee 88-4226-000-00 svc fee 35-4226-000-00 svc fee 11-4226-000-00 svc fee 29-4226-000-00 svc fee 888 Totals Ternp Check Nurnber 74 Temp Check Nurnber 75 75 Oakcrest Kennels 01-4221-800-90 Page 12 Amount __2,95 152.55 375.50 62.40 62.40 19,42 446. 74 33.44 363.12 67.48 930. 24 74.50 74.50 33, 442. 50 1,350.00 19, 162.50 20, 000. 00 99, 960. 00 16, 254.50 11, 389. 25 200.00 400.00 600.00 200. 00 150.00 203,108.75 Jun svc 105.00 fl 0 r) (1) 0 14 Jul 1 Fri 3:0, A Temp Check Number Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 75 Oakcrest Kennels 150 Totals Temp Check Number 75 Temp Check Number 78 76 Oxygen Service Co 76 Oxypen Service Co 152 Totals Temp Cneck Number Temp Check Number 77 77 P & H Whse 77 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Numper 78 78 Pilorim Cleaner 78 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Numper 79 79 Pete Poppler & Sons -V- " 79 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 80 Claims List City of Mendota Heiph,, Account Code 01-4225-800-90 75 08-4335-000-00 01-4305-030-30 76 01-4330-490-50 77 01-4400-020-20 78 01-4500-050-50 79 80 Principal Mutual 01-2071 80 Principal Mutual 01-4132-020-20 80 Principal Mutual 01-4132-050-50 240 Totals Temp Check Number 80 Ternp Check Number 81 81 Public Empl Ret Assn 81 Public Empl Ret Assn 81 Public Empl Ret Assn 81 Public Empl Ret Assn 324 Totals Terno Check Number 4. 01-2074 01-4131-110-10 01-4131-020-20 01-4131-050-50 81 COMMentS jun svc act thru 6/30 Paue 13 Amount 103.07 208.07 18.00 act thru 6/30 13.50 parts cine thru Jun 31.50 730.3c 790.32 318.95 318.95 stump removal 20.00 Jul prem Jul prem Jul prem Jul prem Jul prem Jul prem Jul prem 20.00 191.27 77.06 20.26 3.88.55 72.00 9.00 12.00 12.00 105.00 14 Jul 1 Fri �.,:0 ;r- Claims List Page 14 City of Mendota H ighs Ternp Cheek Number 82 Temp. Check Number Verrcor Name Account Code Comments Amount 82 Rhornar industries 01-4422-050-50 splys 170.79 82 170.79 Totals Ternp Check Number 82 Temp Check Number 6 -83 Brad Ragan Inc 157-4330-490-60 tires 182.6 7 83 Brad Raman Inc 01-4330-490-70 rprs 19.81 83 Brad Ragan Inc 01-4330-490-70 parts 69.58 -83 Brad Ragan Inc 01.-4330-490-70 .. rprs 16.90 332 Totals Terni Check Number 83 Temp Check Number 84 84 Ruff Cut 01-4490-040-40 84 Totals Temp Check. Number' 64 Ternp Check Number 85 85 Ryan. Contractinc 16-4460-717-00 85 Totals Temp Check Number T u nber- T erne Check Number 86 86 Ruffridce Johnson Ey Co 86 Totals Ternp Check. Number Temp Check Number 87 87 Shawn Sanders 87 Totals Ternp Check Number Temp Check Number 88 88 Shamrock Cleaers 88 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 89 She1s Auto Electric 89 0 1 -4305-050-50 86 05-4300-105-15 67 01-4410-020-20 88 01-4338-490-70 weed cut pyrnt 1 merrdota meadows splys exo reirnb jun cing rors 306. 16 200.00 200.00 89, 092. 90 89.092:90 47. 66 47. 66 71.17 71.17 64.65 64. 65 40.39 ;ID 14 Jul 3 Fri Temp Check Number 89 Ter Check Number Vencor Name 89 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 90 90 Gordon SQerven 90 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 91 91 Snyder Drug Stores Claims List City of Mendota Heights Account Code 89 01-4400-030-30 90 COMMentS ff conf 01-4305-070-70 sblys 91 Totals Temp Check Number 91 Temp Check Number 92 92 Southview Chev 92 Southview Chev 92 Southview Chev 92 Southview Chev 92 Southview Chev 460 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 93 ' 93Southview Garden Center 93 Southview Garden Center 186 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 94 Pace 15 Amount 40.39 209.94 209: 94 16.97 16.97 ' 15-4330-490-60 parts 409 10.78 01-4330-445-40 parts 11.90 01-4330-440-20 parts 203.59 01-4330-490-70 parts 157.18 01-4330-490-70 rors 367.16 '32 15-4330-490-60 01-4337-050-50 93 94 State Treasurer 01-3315 94 State Treasurer 15-3315 94 State Treasurer 01-3615 282 Totals Temp Check Number 94 Ternp Check Number 95 95 T I E Systems Inc 95 Totals Ternp Check Number 01-4330-440-20 95 splys splys 2nd qtr s/chgs 2nd qtr s/chps 2nd qtr s/chgs rbrs 750.61 23.95 23.98 47, 93 1,730.85 8.00 69. 55cr 1,669.30 152.00 152.00 CT) • 0 • 0 3! 14 Jul 1' Fri 3:0L ,r1 City of Mendota Heigh,• Claims List Pace 16 Ternp Check Number Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 96 T M I Coatings Inc 96 Totals Ternp Check. Number Temp Check Number 97 Uri1fcrrns Unlimited 97 Uniforms Unlimited 97 Uniforms Unlimited 97 Uni forms Unlimited 388 Totals Tema Check Number Temp Check Number 98 U S West Cellular 98 U S West Cellular 98 U S West Cellular 98 U S West Cellular - 392 Totals Temp Check Number Temp Check Number 99 Diane Ward '99 Totals Ternp Check Number 96 97 S8 99 Ternp Check Number 100 100 Westside Eq 100 Westside Eq 100 Westside Eq 300 Totals Temp Check Number Ternp Check Number 101 101 Winthrop & Weinstine 101 Winthrop & Weinstine 101 Winthrop & Weinstine 101 Winthrop & Weinstine 101 Winthrop & Weinstine 505 Totals Temp Check Number Account Code 37-4330-479-00 96 01-4410-020-20 01-4410-020-20 01-4410-020-20 01-4410-020-20 97 01-4210-030-30 01-4.10-020-20 01-4210-110-10 01-4305-030-30 98 05-4400-105-15 99 01-4335-310-50 01-4335-310-70 15-4335-310-60 100 01-4221-120-10 01-4220-120-10 01-4220-120-80 16-4220-120-00 01-4220-120-10 101 Comments re water tower spTys and rson splys intern splys flandrich splys jun svc jun svc jun svc' eq tuit exp reirn;J rprs rprs rprs may retainer may re zo ord may re brookfieid la may re rnendot a mall may re fireworks Amount' 88,318.65 68, 318.65 452.63 (5.45 1,323.18 20.77 1,872.23 6.62 114.73 4.91 279.03 , 405.49 678. 75 678.75 37.15 37. 15 37.17 111.47 528. 80 581.40 955. 30 2,056.20 290. 00 4,411.70 ;ht c t-) 0 0 0 14 Jul 1' Fri 3:0E• Temp Check Number Temp. Check Number Vendor Name 12237 Grand Total '1P 101 Claims List City of Mendota Heir r)ts Account Code MANUAL ..HECKS 15356 15358 15361 15362 15363 1536 15365 15366 15367 15368 15369 15370 15371 15372 15373 15374 15375 15376 15377 350.00 34.00 2,673.33 4,625.55 150.00 240.00 9,135.20 13.84 1,047.62 1,045.00 225.00 170.00 266.40 555.00 3,921.07 17,002.29 48,839.54 773.72 15.00 15378 130.00 15379-80 68.00 91,279.56 G.T 1,663,651.85 Trycia Haynes Tom Nelsom Commercial Asphalt State Capitol C U Minn Dept Health MPCA PERA ICMA Minn Mutual Great West L & A Minn State Retirem.nt Dakota County Dakota Bank Commissioner REvenue Dakota Bank. . Payroll a/c U S West Shawne O'Gara John Glynn. umpires Ccii;irn rtS concert *ire wear mix 7/7 payroll clan review 7/7 payroll ol • lift station refund recr fee in line skate instructor Pape 17 Amount 1,672,412.29 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 1 , 1995 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrate FROM: Guy Kullander, Parks Project Manager SUBJECT: Backstops at Mendakota Park BACKGROUND Council has, on several occasions, discussed improvements to the backstops in this park to prevent foul balls from hitting spectators. Council directed staff to seek bids to extend the existing sixteen foot high by eighty foot long backstops an additional ten feet in height. The specifications allowed the contractor to begin work by mid August and be completed no later than November 1st of this year. Bid Process bids: A bid package was sent to six fence contractors, three of them submitted Century (Forest Lake) Fence -Co (Mpls) Viking (Mpls) $ 8,189 $ 9,935 $10,284 A bid bond was not requested for this project. RECOMMENDATION If Council desires to extend the backstops in Mendakota Park they should award the contract to the lowest bid submitted by Century Fence. This work would be funded from the Special Park Fund. ACTION REQUIRED Direct staff to issue a purchase order to Century Fence in the amount of $8,189 to extend the backstops at Mendakota Park. GDK:kkb July 13, 1995 Memo to: Tom Lawell From: Guy Kullander Re: Bidders for backstop extensions at Mendakota Park I sent bid packages to six firms, one of which was TwinCity Wire - MFI, the firm that provided the Mayor a quote on adding six foot overhangs on each backstop. This firm was not one of the three firms that submitted a bid for this work. Action Required None. This is for information only CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini FROM: Marc Mogan 1`49,4 Civil Engineer SUBJECT: Curley's Valley View Addition Street Reconstruction Feasibility Hearing Update DISCUSSION: July 14, 1995 Council was presented and accepted the feasibility report for the Curley's Valley View Addition Street Reconstruction project at the June 20, 1995, Council meeting subject to some minor revisions. Those revisions, plus a recommendation concerning the width of Cullen Avenue, between Lexington Avenue and Theresa Street, are reflected in the attached updated feasibility report. A cover letter and public hearing notice were mailed out to the owners of the 108 parcels abutting the proposed improvements (see attached). Staff has received one letter in opposition and one letter in support, (see attached), and has had conversations with two property owners at 2121 Theresa Street, and 2180 Lexington Avenue who support the total reconstruction project including concrete curb and gutter and storm sewer. The property owner at 2180 Lexington Avenue, while supporting a total reconstruction project, requested that the section of Cullen Avenue between Lexington Avenue and Theresa Street be constructed no wider than 25 feet face to face in order to save trees, maintain existing boulevard slopes, and reduce the encroachment of the street towards the existing house which is constructed just outside public right-of-way. RECOMMENDATION: Council should consider all written and verbal input expressed by the public, or engineering staff, relative to the proposed total street reconstruction project with concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer at the upcoming public hearing. If Council is convinced that the proposed improvement project is merited after careful consideration of all the views expressed throughout the public hearing process, I recommend that Council adopt a resolution ordering the proposed improvement project, and authorize the preparation of plans and specifications for a total street reconstruction project including concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer. ACTION REQUIRED: Council should conduct the public hearing, at which time I will be prepared to make an oral presentation and answer any questions which may arise concerning the proposed improvement project. If Council desires to implement the recommendation, they should pass a motion adopting Resolution No. 95-_, RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS TO SERVE CURLEY'S VALLEY VIEW ADDITION AND SURROUNDING AREAS (IMPROVEMENT NO. 93, PROJECT NO. 4). MSM: dfw 0. Head 0 &Neck r Physicians (St Surgeons Clinic, P.A. 2 c'v "1-44 -cid Z VI Z —fl- 61u zo„ c� Ear, Nose and Throat Care for Adults and Children _ Leighton G. Siegel, M.D. • Stephen L. Liston, M.D. • Jeffrey C. Manlove, M.D. • Jon V. Thomas, M.D. July 12, 1995 Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Ms. Swanson: Katherine and I regret to inform you that we will not be able to attend the meeting on Tuesday, July 18 regarding improvements in Curley's Valley View Addition (Improvement No. 93, Project No. 4). We wanted to let you know that we approve of the Curley Addition improvements. If you have any further questions, please feel free tq contact me. Sincerely, Stephen L. Liston, M.D. S L L c k 310 N. Smith Ave.. Suite 120 • St. Paul. MN 55102 • 612-227-0821 • Fax 612-297-6597 1088 William Ct. Mendota Hts, MN 55120 July 10, 1995 City of Mendota Hts Mendota HTS, MN 55118 To the City Administrator;" I am writing to the proposed street assessment slated for that was just sent to us. A:.;couple of years ago, my husband and I signed a petition for street improvements in this area. We never heard any project. Now we understand that you are seeking comments of these st-reets. 2 _ .71k‘ Vic the Curley Addition with Mrs. Pat White more about this about the updating Since my husband and I will be on vacation during the town meeting, we wanted to tell you our feelings on the issue. We want new streets put in as they are in terrible shape, but we do not want curbs, gutters, etc. as we like the rural look in this area. We would also be interested in having the option to talk with the firm that is putting in the streets to get a big for redoing our own driveway. I feel there are a lot of residents that need driveway work done, and this company could stand to gain lots of additional business if they offer the residents a competitive bid. Thank you very much for taking our "written vote" on this project. Sincerely, Debbie Smith CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO July 12, 1995 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator Marc Mogan Civil Engineer Updated Feasibility Report Curley's Valley View Street Reconstruction Job No. 9311 Improvement No. 93, Project No. 4 INTRODUCTION: The condition of the existing streets in the Curley's Valley View Addition neighborhood are such that typical preventative maintenance practices no longer provides an acceptable driving surface. The streets ih Curley's Valley View Addition were constructed around 1970, and have surpassed their expected 20 year useful service life. The streets in this neighborhood warrant resurfacing or total reconstruction under these circumstances, in order to restore the street to an acceptably smooth bituminous surface. This feasibility report, which was ordered by Council Resolution No. 93-53, on September 21, 1993, will discuss the project history, description, costs, fmancing, schedule, and offers a recommendation for the improvement. PROJECT HISTORY: Ms. Pat White presented the City with a petition for the preparation of a street reconstruction feasibility report in April 1993, signed by 32 of the 96 property owners of the Curley Valley View Addition neighborhood. The petition circulated throughout the neighborhood by Ms. White offered the residents a choice of two possible improvement options, and estimated the approximate cost of each option. One option was a simple overlay at approximately $1,500 per lot. The second option was based on the assumption that the City would fund 50 percent of a total reconstruction project including concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer at a cost to the homeowner of approximately $3,400 per lot. Most of the property owners who signed that petition favored the total reconstruction option. At the time the petition was received, the Engineering Department was in the process of designing or constructing several projects that were already scheduled, or had higher priority. Council's adoption of a moratorium on street reconstruction projects pending resolution of the Friendly Hills Improvement project already in progress, delayed any work on the Curley Street Reconstruction project. Completion of the other work, and resolution of the street reconstruction moratorium associated with the Friendly Hills Street Reconstruction project presently under construction, affords the Engineering Department an opportunity to resume work on this improvement project. The streets in Curley's Valley View Addition were constructed in the early 1970s. The streets were constructed to the City's rural standard of 30 feet wide with a 6" gravel base and a 2" bituminous surface. During the past 25 years, the streets have been slowly deteriorating, street sections have lost their crown, water is ponding in front of many driveways and the bituminous surface is cracking and crumbling. Potholes and deficient street sections are repaired under the yearly street maintenance budget and the current frequency and extent of these repairs suggest that this course of action is no longer prudent. The normal expected service life for bituminous streets is 20 years, which at this time would suggest that a street reconstruction project for this neighborhood is warranted. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: There are approximately 1.6 miles of streets in the Curley's Valley View Addition neighborhood, which include Cullen Avenue, Mary Adele Avenue, Patricia Avenue, Theresa Street, Timmy Street, Tom Thumb Boulevard, and William Court. A complete reconstruction project in this neighborhood would be more complicated than adding curb and gutter and installing a new bituminous surface. Installation of B618 concrete curb and gutter might affect existing drainage patterns on private property. Grading will be required to match the existing grades with the proposed curb. Side yards may need to be regraded to drain backyards effectively. All streets, except for those sections between 989 and 1025 William Court, and Cullen Avenue from Lexington Avenue to Theresa Street, would be reconstructed to meet seven (7) ton capacity pavement section design requirements, constructed 33 feet wide face to face with concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer where appropriate. Those sections of street between 989 and 1013 William Court, and Cullen Avenue from Lexington Avenue to Theresa Street, would also be reconstructed as a seven (7) ton design capacity pavement section, but would be constructed only 25 feet wide face to face with concrete curb and gutter in order to save trees, and/or avoid some potentially significant watermain construction costs. Installation of curb and gutter, also means that storm sewer will be needed to route storm water runoff effectively off-site. There are primarily four locations in the Curley neighborhood where storm water presently drains. Four separate storm sewer systems would be constructed to provide adequate drainage for the entire neighborhood. Due to some downstream concerns associated with the discharge from the proposed Mary Adele drainage systems, the fmal design of these storm water systems may provide for some local street flooding during major storm events, or may include a comprehensive storm water ponding design in conjunction with the proposed Curley Redevelopment plan currently in the concept planning stage north of this neighborhood. An effective way of rebuilding streets to achieve a greater design strength is to reclaim the existing bituminous surface and incorporate the reclaimed bituminous as part of the base material. This method has been used with good success on the London/Downing street project, and the Friendly Hills reconstruction project now under construction, and would be used on this project. Construction would commence with reclamation of the existing bituminous surface that would be crushed for use as a recycled aggregate base for this improvement project. Storm sewer pipes would be constructed in accordance with the storm sewer system design. Existing ditches and driveway culverts would be eliminated. Inadequate street subgrade conditions would be repaired. Drain tile would be installed, where necessary and feasible, to provide a stable subgrade for street construction. Additional aggregate base would be placed as required. Concrete curb and gutter would be constructed, followed by the construction of two lifts of bituminous surface. Driveways would be reconstructed in kind, to the extent they were disturbed. Boulevards would be finished graded and restored with seed or sod. PROJECT COSTS: A summary of the preliminary estimated project costs including contingencies, engineering, administration, and overhead for the proposed improvement are as follows: Item Description Project Cost Watermain $10,000.00 Storm Sewer $165,000.00 City Standard Streets $645,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST $820,000.00 PROJECT FINANCING: This project would be fmanced from a combination of special assessments, Infrastructure Reserve, Water Utility, anti Tax Increment Financing (ilk) Funds. In 1992, City Council adopted the Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy. This policy encourages the upgrading of rural street sections to City Standard Streets. The policy also provides funds from various City funding sources to aid in the cost of reconstruction. The City Street Rehabilitation and Reconstruction policy states that the City will finance up to 50 percent (50 %) of the total project cost for a project to upgrade and reconstruct streets that meet the requirements for City Standard Streets. That same policy indicates that benefited properties should be assessed the cost of the upgrade or capital improvement (i.e., storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter). This project proposes to deviate from this funding policy in a manner consistent with the Friendly Hills improvement project now under construction. On the Friendly Hills project, after deducting all possible Water Utility, TIF, or Municipal State Aid (MSA) funding contributions, the City funded 50 percent (50 %) of all project costs from the Infrastructure Reserve Fund that would be otherwise assessed against benefiting properties. The same funding approach is being recommended to fmance the cost of these improvements. Under this proposal, the property owner would be assessed one half of the cost of the proposed improvement project with matching City Infrastructure Reserve funds after deducting all contributions from other possible City funding sources. I recommend that all incidental watermain related construction costs be financed out of the Water Utility Fund. The north side of Mary Adele Avenue abuts property which is now vacant and is included in the current Curley Redevelopment proposal under consideration for the commercial property in the southeast quadrant of Highway 110 and Lexington Avenue. Given the fact that this property will not benefit from this improvement project unless this property is developed as single family lots, I recommend that the proportionate share of the improvement costs attributable to this property (eight equivalent lots) including any necessary drainage and utility easement acquisition costs on the Curley site be paid with Tax Increment Funds. That portion of William Court abutting I -35E is another area of this proposed improvement project which is not assessable. ' I recommend that a proportionate share of the improvement costs (seven equivalent lots) along the frontage of I -35E be funded by TIF. All other properties in the project improvement boundary would be assessed 50 percent of the remaining improvement costs on a per lot basis. Any lots which are currently vacant, (one lot each on Patricia Street, Theresa Street, and William Court) would be included in the total number of assessable lots for the determination of the per lot cost, but could have the assessments deferred until such time as the property is developed. U.S. West has title to a parcel on the north side of Cullen Avenue which would be assessed on the basis of one-half of an equivalent residential lot. Based on the above criteria, the proposed improvement funding amounts are as follows: City Standard Streets: Funding Amount Water Utility: Tax Increment Financing: Infrastructure Reserve Fund: Special Assessment: $10,000.00 $58,000.00 $376,000.00 $376.000.00 TOTAL PROJECT: $820,000.00 The proposed assessment per residential lot including three vacant lots, and fifteen and one half equivalent residential lots is: $376,000 _ 107.5 = $3,500 per lot. PROJECT SCHEDULE: It is anticipated that the entire improvement could be substantially completed during the 1996 construction if the project is ordered and approved in a timely manner. Following is a tentative schedule of target dates for the proposed improvement project. Task Time Public Hearing July 18, 1995 Field Survey October - December 1995 Design November 1995 - January 1996 Bid February 1996 Construct May - October 1996 Assess October 1996 PROJECT INITIATION: The proposed improvement project was brought before the City Council by a petition of less than 35 percent (35 %) of the total assessable frontage of property owners in the Curley's Valley View Addition neighborhood, and therefore, Minnesota State Statue Chapter 429, "Local Improvements, Special Assessments" stipulates that a four-fifths majority will be required if the City Council is to order this proposed public improvement. ACTION REQUIRED: This updated feasibility report is for Council information only. No formal action is required because Council scheduled the public hearing for the proposed improvement project subject to the revisions contained in this updated feasibility report. MSM:dfw STATE HIGHWAY 110 EXINGTON AVENUE • a Q MARY ADELE AVENUE W cc N W w a 0 0 N / / CULLEN AVENUE G LU C W J PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE PROPOSED CURLEY REDEVELOPMENT AREA u0 o �a z We O > LU MM C0 I - LU w CC Z� O �. I��-. Q QNQ LL Ca W_ ›- -J J W • m cc z j O gaC' V 0 VACANT LOT City of !JJ Mendota Heights June 27, 1995 Subject: Curley's Valley View Addition Street Reconstruction Public Hearing Notification Job No. 9311 Improvement No. 93, Project No. 4 Dear Resident: Please find attached the formal notice establishing a public hearing to consider a street improvement project to serve the Curley's Valley View Addition neighborhood. Ms. Pat White presented a petition to the City to request the preparation of a street reconstruction feasibility repot in April 1993, signed by 32 of the 96 property owners of the Curley Valley View Addition neighborhood. The petition circulated throughout the neighborhood by Ms. White offered the residents a choice of two possible improvement options, and estimated the approximate cost of each option. One option was a simple bituminous overlay at approximately $1,500 per lot. The second option was based on the assumption that the City would fund 50 percent (50 %) of a total reconstruction project including concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer at a cost to the homeowner of approximately $3,400 per lot. Most property owners who signed that petition favored the second total reconstruction option. At the time the petition was received, the Engineering Department was in the process of designing or constructing several projects that were already scheduled, or had higher priority. Council's adoption of a moratorium on street reconstruction projects pending resolution of the Friendly Hills Improvement project already in progress, delayed any work on the Curley Street Reconstruction project. Completion of the other work, and resolution of the street reconstruction moratorium associated with the Friendly Hills Street Reconstruction project presently under construction, affords the Engineering Department an opportunity to resume work on this improvement project. The streets in Curley's Valley View Addition were constructed in the early 1970s. The streets were constructed to the City's rural standard of 30 feet wide with a 6" gravel base and a 2" bituminous surface. During the past 25 years, the streets have been slowly deteriorating, street sections have lost their crown, water is ponding in front of many driveways and the bituminous surface is cracking and crumbling. The normal expected service life for bituminous streets is 20 years, which at this time would suggest that a street reconstruction project for this neighborhood is warranted. 1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, MN • 55118 452.1850 Residents Curley's Valley View Addition June 27, 1995 Page Two The feasibility report, which will be discussed at the public hearing was prepared in accordance with the 1993 petition in that it provides for a complete reconstruction project including storm sewer, and concrete curb and gutter. Approximately 1.6 miles of streets including Cullen Avenue, Mary Adele Avenue, Patricia Avenue, Theresa Street, Timmy Street, Tom Thumb Boulevard, and William Court would be reconstructed. All streets, except for that portion between 989 and 1025 William Court would be reconstructed to meet seven (7) ton capacity pavement section design requirements, constructed 33 feet wide face to face with concrete curb and gutter, and storm sewer where appropriate. That section of street between 989 and 1013 William Court would also be reconstructed as a seven (7) ton design capacity pavement section, but would be constructed only 25 feet wide face to face with concrete curb and gutter in order to save trees, and avoid some potentially significant watermain construction costs as well. All properties abutting the improved streets would be assessed fifty percent (50 %) of the project cost on a per lot basis. Lots abutting the north side of Mary Adele Avenue would be assessed a proportionate share of the project cost. All other vacant lots would be -assessed a proportionate share, as well, but those assessments could be deferred until such time as the property is sold. The property owners fifty percent (50%) share of the preliminary estimated project cost is approximately $3,500 per lot. These assessments could be paid up front without interest, or spread out over a period of 19 years on the tax rolls at an estimated average cost of $27 per month. City Council has scheduled a public hearing for July 18, 1995, at 8:00 P.M., which you are invited to attend, to comment on this proposed improvement. If you so desire, you may also express your opinions or comments relative to this improvement project to me, or Jim Danielson, by telephone (452-1850), or preferably in writing prior to this July 18, 1995, public hearing. Sincerely, '7710,* -C S. Marc S. Mogan, P.E. Civil Engineer MSM:dfw Attachment City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED RECONSTRUCTION AND REHABILITATION OF STREETS TO SERVE CURLEY'S VALLEY VIEW ADDITION (IMPROVEMENT NO. 93, PROJECT NO. 4) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota, deems it necessary and desirable to consider construction of the improvements hereinafter described. NOW THEREFORE, notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights will hold a public hearing on said improvements at the following time and place within the said City: Date and Time: Location: The general nature of the improvement is: Tuesday, July 18, 1995 8:00 o'clock P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter. Mendota Heights City Hall 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, Minnesota 55118 The construction of street improvements consisting of the acquisition of easements and the grading, stabilization, aggregate and bituminous surfacing, and the construction of concrete curb and gutter, and storm pipes on the streets to be situated in the area hereinafter more particularly described. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvements is situated within the City of Mendota Heights in Dakota County, Minnesota, and is more particularly described as follows: Those parcels abutting Cullen Avenue, Mary Adele Avenue, Patricia Avenue, Theresa Street, Timmy Street, Tom Thumb Boulevard and William Court. The total estimated cost of reconstruction of the above described reconstruction is $820,000. It is proposed to assess every lot, piece or parcel of land benefitted by said improvements whether abutting thereon or not, based upon benefits received without regard to cash valuation. Persons desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements should be present at this hearing. This Council proposes to proceed under and pursuant to the authority granted by Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes. Dated this 28th day of June, 1995. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk City of Mendota Heights Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. July 17, 1995 TO: The Honorable Mayor Charles Mertensotto and Council Members of the City of Mendota Heights FROM: Shirley and Walter Nielsen SUBJECT: Curley's Valley View Addition Street Reconstruction Job No. 9311 (copy attached) We have no qualms with the reconstruction, but upon receipt of the letter and while reading it, it was stated that they were going to widen the face of the street from 30' to 33' and add curb and gutters. This is where the problem comes in. The house at the southeast corner of Cullen and Lexington (2180 South Lexington) is where my wife's mother lives (the Wilfred "Bob" Franzmeier estate). Being that the house is already so close to the street, I phoned Jim Danielsonand explained our concern. We then set up an appointment for July 10, 1995, at 2:30 p.m. to either meet him or Marc Morgan at the site. On July 10, 1995, we met Marc at the site. Marc and I measured the street face to face and found the width to be 22' and 6". We then measured the distance from the north side of the house and found it to be only 23' to the street. So, in order to get the 33' width, it would then only leave the house 18', 3" from the curb. After discussing the problem with Marc, it was thought that it would be possible to leave the street at 22' and add the curb and gutter to it. On July 13, 1995, I then phoned Mayor Charles Mertensotto and explained the situation to him and what Marc and I had thought about leaving the street at the width it is and adding the curb and gutters to it. Due to physical constraints i.e., north side of street is a steep bank, and on my mother-in-law's side are seven trees and also the short distance from the house to the street, I certainly hope that the project can be done as we have requested. Thank you. Shirley and Walter Nielsen 2106 East 67th Street Inver Grove Heights, MN (612) 457-4739 EC.D -7 -1-7-T7 'Xtte651. ?// 7-ic;6 "ot 22) 2076 Timmy St. Mendota Heights, MN. 55120 July 17, 1995 Marc S. Mogan, P. E. Civil Engineer City of Mendota Heights 1 1 0 1 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights; MN 55118 Dear Mr. Mogan, We are writing regarding the hearing July 16 to reconstruct and rehabilitate streets in Curley's Valley View Addition (improvement No. 93. Project No. 4). We are unable to attend the hearing so are sending our comments in writing. We have lived in the neighborhood for almost 2 years. We support the proposal to reconstruct uct the street and add concrete curb and gutter and storm pipes. We believe this reconstruction 1s needed at this time. The alternative proposal to add a bituminous overlay, in our opinion, would not be a satisfactory option. Sincerely, WoQe44AJ Harlan Holmquist Mary Ore tke MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE DEPARTMENT MEMO July 18, 1995 TO: Marc Mogen Civil Engineer FROM: John P. Maczko Fire Chief SUBJECT: Curley's Valley View Street Reconstruction I have reviewed your updated feasibility report for the above project. Without knowing all the details, I have a concern on the street width on William Court between 989 and 1013 and on Cullen Avenue from Lexington Avenue to Theresa. It was stated that these street sections would only be constructed 25 feet wide face to face. In the feasibility report you do not mention any parking restrictions that would be required as a result of this width. For the maneuverability and access of fire apparatus, at a 25 foot street width, a "No Parking" restriction will be required on one side of the street at a minimum. If you were not planning on this restriction or you see a major problem, call me as soon as possible as I consider this very important. Also as you get into design (assuming it passes), pe,ase review hydrant locations. I am not sure there are any issues. JPM:dfw cc: Tom Lawell, City Administrator Jim Danielson, Public Works Director John Neska, Assistant Fire Chief Paul Kaiser, Fire Marshal CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis SUBJECT: Presentation of Airport Relations Commission MEMO July 14, 1995 DISCUSSION Recently the City Council met with the Airport Relations Commission to discuss the many airport related issues which affect Mendota Heights, and the adopted work plan of the Commission to address these issues. At this workshop it was suggested that the Airport Relations Commission provide an update on its activities to the community at an upcoming City Council meeting. This presentation has been scheduled for our July 18th Council meeting. Present for the presentation will be Committee Chair Scott Beaty and several other members of the Commission. The presentation will summarize the accomplishments of the Commission over the last year, and will describe the issues the Commission intends to address in the coming year. Input gathered from the City Council and the community will be helpful to the Commission in preparing an update to its Airport Noise Plan of Action which was adopted in August, 1994 (see attached). ACTION REQUIRED Receive the presentation of the Airports Relations Commission and discuss the status of on-going and upcoming airport noise related issues. Specific Council and resident suggestions for the Commission's 1995-1996 Airport Noise Plan of Action are welcome. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT NOISE PLAN OF ACTION AUGUST 2/1994 Air Noise Plan of Action Action Plan Summary A) Action Plan Development Process B) List of Possible Topics of Consideration C) Action Plan Elements: 1. Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures a) Implementation of Non -Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure b) Adoption of "Close -In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights c) Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights Page 2 Air Noise Plan of Action Action Plan Summary Continued 2. Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns a) Produce and Distribute Informative Refrigerator Magnets Advertising the MAC Noise Complaint Line b) Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information. c) Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Commission 3. MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan a) Prevent Construction "of Third North Parallel Runway 4.. Conversion to Stage III Quieter Aircraft a) Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000 Page 3 Air Noise Plan of Action Action Plan Summary Continued 5. Noise Reduction Through Litigation a) Determine Feasibility of a Legal Challenge to Current Air Noise Distribution 6. Air Noise Mitigation Through Sound Insulation a) Assure Installation of Sound Insulation in Schools Affected by Air Noise Exposure k;! Page 4 L._ Air Noise Plan of Action Action Plan Development Process * Identify Focus Issue * Identify Specific Goal * List What Needs To Be Done - Action Steps * Identify Who Will Work On Each Step * Determine When Each Step Is To Be Done Page 5 T., Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Implementation of Non -Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure Action Steps: 1. Review previous MAC representations on issue with City Council Who When Staff/ARC June 16, 1994 2. Draft letter to MAC requesting Staff July 1994 update on revised non -simultaneous takeoff procedures - invite Mr. Hamiel to upcoming ARC meeting 3. Depending upon response, chose • Staff/ARC Aug. 1994 appropriate means of advocating rapid implementation of new procedures Page 6 Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of "Close -In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights Action Steps: Who When 1. Review FAA Requirements Staff/ARC June 16, 1994 with City Council 2. Continue Participation on Staff/Council On going MASAC Operations Committee which is currently reviewing issue 3. MASAC Operations Committee MASAC July 1994? reports to full MASAC MASAC reports recommendation MASAC Aug. 1994? to MAC Planning and Environment Committee MAC Planning and Environment MAC Sept. 1994? reports recommendation to MAC MAC recommends to FAA procedure be tested Page 7 MAC Sept. 1994? Q31 Continued Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of "Close -In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights Action Steps: pi 7. FAA designs flight procedure be tested FAA begins flight test Page 8 v Who When FAA Sept. 1994? FAA Sept. 1994? Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights Action Steps: Who When 1. Review previous MAC Staff/ARC June 16, 1994 representations on issue with City Council 2. Research nighttime flight Staff/ARC Sept. 1994 restrictions imposed at other U.S. airports 3. Depending upon findings, Staff/ARC Oct. -Nov. prepare request to MAC 1994 for adoption of more stringent i- -: requirements Page 9 F Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: - Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Produce and Distribute Informative Refrigerator Magnets Advertising the MAC Air Noise Complaint Line. Action Steps: 1. Investigate costs of magnet production and distribution 2. Commission to review design 3. Order delivered to City Hall 4. Magnets distributed to Council and Airport Relations Commission 5. Commission to review final letter and news release �. Magnets distributed to residents Staff 7. Additional magnets available at Staff City Hall upon request Who Staff When May 1994 Commission June 8, 1994 June 16, 1994 Staff June 16, 1994 Commission July 13, 1994 Page 10 July 29, 1994 Until Gone E_4 Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information Action Steps: Who When 1. Expand mailing list for ARC agenda Staff Aug. 1994 to include State Senators and Reps. Mail letters to State Senators and Staff Aug. 1994 Representatives introducing ARC 3. Invite guests to monthly ARC Staff On going meetings (ie., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State elected officials) 4. Expand coverage of air noise issues Staff Aug. 1994 in City newsletter Continue distribution of refrigerator Staff On going magnets advertising MAC air noise complaint line Page 11 Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Commission Action Steps: Who When 1. Review current distribution of Staff Aug. 1994 MAC Commissioners with ARC Prepare letter to gubernatorial Staff Sept. 1994 candidates asking for their position on MSP expansion, corridor use, MAC representation Discuss City concerns with our ARC Oct. 1994 current MAC representative 4. Monitor gubernatorial election Staff Nov. 1994 this fall Discuss concerns with State Senators and Reps. regarding composition of MAC Staff/ARC Jan. 1995 6. Draft legislation to amend Staff Jan. 1995 E, ,; number of commissioners - and districts boundaries represented Page 12 1!, Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Goal: Prevent Construction of Third North Parallel Runway Action Steps: Who When 1. Update Commission on status Staff Aug. 1994 of MSP LTCP study Continue participation on MSP Staff On-going Technical Working Committee 3. Respond to public comment Council/ Sept. 1994 request on Draft Alternative ARC Environmental Document for MSP • Retain experts to assist in efforts Council As Needed to prevent the designation of the third north parallel runway as the preferred MSP expansion alternative Respond to public comment Council/ Dec. 1994 request on Final Alternative ARC Environmental Document for MSP Page 13 Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Conversion to Stage III Quieter Aircraft Goal: Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000 Action Steps: 1. Review NWA obligations to MAC regarding Stage II phaseout and research fleet mix at various airports around the country Who When Staff/ARC Aug. 1994 Prepare letter to MAC regarding Staff Aug. 1994 ongoing contract talks with NWA to request inclusion of language specifying phase out date Work with MAC commissioners Staff/ARC Sept. 1994 who are supportive of effort to • help build consensus amongst MAC Letter to NWA asking for their cooperation in committing to Year 2000 phaseout. 5. Prepare media news releases and information letters explaining issue and asking for letters and/or calls to MAC in support of contractual language Page 14 Staff Sept. 1994 Staff Sept. 1994 Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Noise Reduction Through Litigation Goal: Determine Feasibility of a Legal Challenge to Current Air Noise Distribution Action Steps: Who When 1. Review history of legal Staff/ARC Nov. 1994 challenges related to air noise 2. Investigate FAA procedures in Staff Dec. 1994 - effect at time of 1973 corridor June 1995 decision - Freedom of Information Act request? 3. Information to be presented to ARC Staff July 1995 and recommendation formulated Council considers recommendation Council Aug. 1995 and determines desired course of action Page 15 Air Noise Plan of Action Issue: Assure Installation of Sound Insulation in Schools Affected by Air Noise Exposure Goal: Air Noise Mitigation Through Sound Insulation Action Steps: Who When 1. Meet with school Staff Jan. 1995 administrators to discuss need 2. Analyze MAC School Staff/ARC Jan. 1995 Noise Monitoring Study 3. Work with schools to Staff/ARC Mar. 1995 to prepare funding request for insulation 4. Approval of funding Council April 1995 request for submittal to MAC Page 16 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO TO: Mayor, City Council and City Admini FROM: James E. Danielson, Public Works D.ni:E8r( SUBJECT: Mendota Plaza Plan Review DISCUSSION: July 12, 1995 Council approved a Developer's Agreement with the Mendota Mall Associates at their June 6, 1995, meeting. This agreement provided for Tax Increment Financing (TIF) participation for some safety and beautification improvements to the parking lot and site. According to Section 4.2 of the Agreement, the Developer has submitted the attached construction plans for review and approyal by the City. Prior to submission of these plans, the Developer and his Engineer met with staff to discuss the plans and address potential problems. The following concerns were addressed: Right Turn Lane A right turn lane is being added to Dodd Road for north bound traffic's access to the center. Costs for that work have been kept separate from the rest of the project because Mn/DOT's approval has to be obtained before that work can be completed. Application for a permit to do the work has been made, however, approvals have not yet been received. Truck Access The current Mall entrance located on Dodd Road is being widened and the radii increased to 50 feet to accommodate semi -truck access to the site. These modifications will allow semi -trucks to enter and exit the center without having to cross into oncoming traffic lanes. The parking lot pavement surface is being designed to accommodate heavy truck traffic on the south or "back side" of the center. The lot will be signed preventing truck traffic from parking or driving any other place on the lot. Standard Station Comments The plan has been designed to remove the Standard Station's south driveway access from the site, their access points will remain from Dodd Road. A surmounted type curb will be installed however, so that fuel delivery trucks can still enter and exit that way. Mr. Chuck Thomey, operator of the station has been shown a copy of the plans by Mr. Streeter, Paster Enterprises, and approved of the design. Landscaping The landscaping plans that were prepared concentrated on improving the looks of the Dodd Road entrance and the store front (see attached). The project includes a landscaped, irrigated area at the new improved entrance, accenting the new sign to be added at Dodd Road. The foundation for this new sign will be included with this project and the sign will be installed in a subsequent project, immediately following this project. Flower planters will be added to the sidewalk adjacent to the building. An illustration and specification for the planter that was selected is attached. Lights The existing parking lot lights will be replaced with a "shoe box" type design lighting. A specification sheet and picture of the light selected is attached. Sign An entrance sign was approved fpr Dodd Road by City Council when the Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved. This sign's design matches the new center sign that was recently installed along Trunk Highway 110. It was approved within the PUD to be no taller than 30 feet high and a setback of 30 feet from Dodd Road. The sign proposed complies with those requirements and a copy of the sign design is attached. Cost The estimated cost of the project continues to be projected to exceed $400,000 and a copy of the latest cost estimate is attached. The City shall reimburse the Developer its share of the improvement costs in two installments. Installment one, shall be one half of the City's obligation, and be paid after $100,000 in City eligible costs have been incurred by the Developer. The remainder shall be paid upon fmal completion and acceptance by the City of the project. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend that the construction plans for the Mendota Mall Parking Lot and entrance sign project be approved as submitted. ACTION REQUIRED: Review the attached plans, the Developer will be present to give a presentation on the project and answer questions. If Council desires to implement the recommendation they should pass a motion approving the plans and authorizing the project. JED:dfw ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE MENDOTA PLAZA SITE IMPROVEMENTS MENDOTA HEIGHTS BMI PROJECT NO. TC94.0065 07/06/95 SCHEDULE A ESTIMATED OUAN TIE5; MNDOT ITEM SPEC UNIT UNIT PRICE APPROX. QUANT. AMOUNT 2021.E MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM LIN FT $6,000.00 *2.00 1.00 $6,000.00 1215 $2,430.00 2104.501 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 2104.501 REMOVE SEWER PIPE LIN FT $5.00 295 $1,475.00 2104.509 REMOVE CB STRUCTURE EACH $250.00 2 $500.00 2104.509 REMOVE PIPE APRON EACH 5200.00 3 $600.00 2104.509 REMOVE AND SALVAGE UGHT POLE AND FIXTURE EACH 5300.00 3 $900.00 2104.509 REMOVE UGHT POLE FOUNDATION EACH $500.00 4 $2,000.00 2104.513 SAW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LIN FT *1.50 750 $1,125.00 2104.525 PLUG 12" CMP EACH 5250.00 1 $250.001 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) CU YD $5.50 5740 $31,570.00 2105.525 SUBGRADE CORRECTION (EV)(1) CU YD *6.00 800 $4,800.00 2105.521 COMMON BORROW (ON-SITE) (EV)_ CU YD 55,50 500 $2,750.00 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (LV)_ CU YD *10.00 175$1,750.00 2105.543 STABILIZING AGGREGATE TON *10.00 100 $1,000.00 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 (P)_ TON $7.50 , 4660 $34,950.00 2341.508 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE/ OVERLAY TON $26.00 2155 $56,030.00 2331.521 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TON *24.00 2055 $49,320.00 0231.606 BITUMINOUS JOINT REPAIR (1) LIN FT *1.10 4000 $4,400.00 2357.502 BRUMINOUS MATEI,IA . FOR TACK COAT GALLON *1.50 1200 $1,800.00 2411.505 5' REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB SQ FT $5.00 500 $2500.00 2411.505 8' BLOCK WALL AND FOOTINGS UN FT *150.00 120 $18,000.00 2503.511 12" HDPE PIPE SEWER LIN FT *18.00 140 *2,520.00 2503.511 18" HDPE PIPE SEWER LIN FT 523.00 200 $4,600.00 2503.511 24" HDPE PIPE SEWER R LIN FT 527.00 395 510,665.00 2503.511 24' RC PIPE SEWER LIN FT $38.00 185 $7,030.00 2503.511 30" HDPE PIPE SEWER LIN FT $34.00 455 515,470.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES H LIN FT *120.00 12.3 51,476.00 2506.501 CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES C/G UN FT $130.00 38.9 $5,057.00 2506.516 CASTING ASSEMBLY (STORM SEWER) EACH $225.00 7 $1,575.00 2503.572 ENERGY DISSIPATER -SURGE BASIN EACH 52,000.00 1 $2,000.00 2506.522 ADJUST EXISTING MH OR VALVE BOX EACH $250.00 5 $1,250.00 2511.501 RANDOM RIPRAP, CLASS N CU YD $50.00 10 5500.00 2521.501 4'CONCRETE WALK _ SQ FT 52.50 300 $750.00 2531.501 CONCRt I t CURB & GUI 1 tH DESIGN B618 LIN FT *5.50 1520 $8,360.00 0531.601 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER SQ FT 54.50 520 *2,340.00 2545.511 UGHTING UNIT - 2 HEAD EACH $5,80000 7 54060000 2545.511 UGHTING UNIT - 3 HEAD EACH 56,000.00 1 5600000 0563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM $5,000.00 1.00 $5,000.00 2564.531 FURNISH & INSTALL SIGN TYPE C SQ FT 525.00 46 $1,150.00 0564.602 PAVEMENT SYMBOLS EACH 550.00 7 5350.00 0564.603 4' SOLID UNE YEUDW-PAINTED UN FT $0.50 8500 $4,250.00 0564.603 24' SOLID UNE WHITE -PAINTED LIN FT $2.50 55 $137.50 2571.550 LANDSCAPING LUMP SUM $26,500.00 1 *26,500.00 0573.503 SILT FENCE, PREASSEMBLED MOD. (1) LIN FT *2.00 400 $800.Op I O I AL B81 IMAI tU CUNS I HUCI ION (:OSIS I $372,530.50 (1) Not Subject to MNDOT Specification 1903 (2) P=Plan Quantity CU YD (LV) = Cubic Yards, Loose Volume CU YD (CV) = Cubic Yards, Compacted Volume (Measured in Place) CU YD (EV) = Cubic Yards, Excavated Volume (Measured in Place) ALTERNATE ITEMS MNDOT SPEC ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE APPROX. QUANT. AMOUNT 2341.508 2503.511 2503.511 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE/ OVERLAY 12" RC PIPE SEWER 18' RC PIPE SEWER 2503.511 2503.511 2545.521 24" RC PIPE SEWER 30" RC PIPE SEWER TON LIN FT LIN FT LIN FT *28.00 2155 $60,340.00 *24.00 140 53,360.00 $30.00 $38.00 200 $6,000.00 395 1" RCS CONDUIT WITH 3-#6 THHN WIRE UN FT $56.00 455 LIN FT $8.00 50 $15,010.00 *25,480.00 $400.00 H:\PRIVATE\TC940065L123\BID TAB.W1C3 $110,590.00 PAGE 1 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE DODD ROAD TURNING LANE IMPROVEMENTS MENDOTA HEIGHTS BMI PROJECT NO. TC94.0065 07/06/95 SCHEDULE B EST(MAT'ED Ol1ANTITI MNDOT SPEC ITEM UNIT UNIT PRICE APPROX. QUANT. AMOUNT 2021.501 2104.501 MOBILIZATION REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LUMP SUM UN FT *1,000.00 1.00 $1,000.00 *2.00 380 *760.00 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION 2105.525 2105.525 SUBGRADE CORRECTION TOPSOIL BORROW 2105.521 COMMON BORROW (ON—SITE) 2211.501 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 2331.508 2331.514 2357.502 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE, TYPE 31 (PL (EV (1L (LV)11L ('L CU YD CU YD $5.50 *6.00 260 *1,430.00 50 $300.00 CU YD CU YD *10.00 *5.50 250 $2,500.00 50 $275.00 TON TON *7.50 $26.00 215 *1,612.50 45 *1,170.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT TON GALLON $24.00 100 *2,400.00 2531.501 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DESIGN B618 *1.50 20 *30.00 LIN FT *5.50 320 0563.601 2564.531 0564.602 0564.603 TRAFFIC CONTROL FURNISH & INSTALLSIGN TYPE C PAVEMENT SYMBOLS LUMP SUM *1,000.00 1.00 *1,760.00 *1,000.00 SQ FT *25.00 6.25 *156.25 4• SOUD LINE WHITE—PAINTED EACH *50.00 1 *50.00 LIN FT $0.50 150 $75.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTS (1) Not Subject to MNDOT Specification 1903 (2) P=Plan Quantity CU YD (LV) = Cubic Yards, Loose Volume CU YD (CV) = Cubic Yards, Compacted Volume (Measured in Place) CU YO (EV) = Cubic Yards, Excavated Volum* (Measured in Place) HAPRIVATE\TC940065 123WID TAB.WK3 514,518.75 PAGE2 Aesthetic versatility, durable construction and outstanding photometric performance make WLS V5 an unbeatable choice for outdoor parking area lighting. The V5's reflector system pro- duces maximum lighting efficiency with minimum equipment The V5's lamp and ballast are accessible through the top of the fixture. UL -required ballast cover kis removable to permit easy instal- :TT:T:T: Distinctive Design and Efficient Performance The V5 is designed specifically for parking area lighting and complements a broad range of architectural styles. Outstanding pho- tometric performance produces wide distri- bution patterns, high minimum footcandle Levels, and excellent uniformity dramatically reducing the number of fixtures and poles required for optimal illu- mination. Increased Fixture Life and Ease of Maintenance The V5's housing is con- structed of reinforced, heavy gauge aluminum with a durable bronze finish guaranteed to resist chipping, peeling, scratching and ultraviolet degradation. The lamp and ballast are acces- sible through the top of the fixture, and the UL ballast cover is remov- able to allow easy instal- lation and servicing. More Light for Less The effective combina- tion of a vertical lamp and symmetrical Type 5 segmented reflector system reduces glare and produces a wide uniform light distribu- tion providing maximum lighting efficiency with minimum poles and fix- tures. The V5's reflector system meets the light- ing requirements of ten- ants and developers and is available with metal halide and high pressure sodium lamps— both excellent light sources. One -Man Installation The V5's mounting arm is designed for easy one-man installation. A single unit nut plate, consisting of a plate holding the mounting nuts together, facilitates arm -to -pole mounting. The fixture is then easily mounted to the arm. Electrical Reliability A constant wattage autotransformer ballast with a high power factor ensures starting reliability to -20' Fahrenheit. LIGHTING SYSTEMS Construction Drawing 21/2" O A Installation SIZE 400W 1000W 1215/8r -Sq:. r± `r 1.63/1" Weight = 88 lbs. EPA = 3.2 sq. ft. (Single) EPA = 6.4 sq. ft. (Double) EPA = 9.6 sq. ft. (Triple) EPA = 12.1 sq. ft. (Quad) Photometrics LAMP: 400 Watt Super Metal Halide LUMENS: 40,000 LAMP: 1000 Watt Super Metal Halide LUMENS: 125,000 ID C B LAMP: 400 Watt High Pressure Sodium LUMENS: 50,000 E D C LAMP:1000 Watt High Pressure Sodium LUMENS: 140,000 Values are expressed in initial Footcandles. Distance is expressed as units of mounting height, where each grid increment equals (1) mounting height. MTG. HT.I - 20' 24' _. 10.00 6.94 5;00 3.47 2:00 1.39 50' - 1':63:' 2:63 1.31 2.20; 1:60 0.69 ;1=02 0.51' 0.65 0.53 0.80 0.44 0:40 0.32 0.33 0.26 0.22 0.20 �'_0 16ryz 0.20 0.14 G o;io' 0.26 0._16 0.13- 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.054 0.03 0.03 0.11 010 0:04 0:04 N/A Arm is mounted to pole with bolts secured to nuts mounted on a single unit nut plate. Fixture is then mounted directly to arm. All gasketing is premounted at factory. Optical System 400W Super Metal Halide 400W High Pressure Sodium 1000W Super Metal Halide 1000W High Pressure Sodium Cat. No. WLS-V5-400-SMV WLS-V5-400-S WLS-V5-1000-SMV WLS-V5-1000-S NOTE: Please indicate system voltage — 120V, 208V, 240V, 277V or 480V. WLS LIGHTING SYSTEMS P.O. Box 100519 Fort Worth, Texas 76185 Phone: 800/633-8711 FAX: 817/735-4824 Lighting design provided with computer printouts. MENDOTA PLAZA CATALOG IVO. A HT. GAUGE SHAFT SIZE BASE PLATE BOLT CIRCLE ANCHOR BOLT WEIGHT (LBS) MAX. EPA 20-0-6.5T 20' I1 _6.5" TO 3.7" 7 0 TO 3.5" 10.0" SQ. 10.5-" SQ. 9 1/2" 10" 3/4"x 34" 3/4"x 34" 189 229 20 19 25 -0- 7T 25 11 30-0-7.5T 30' II 8.0"TO 3.2" 11.0"SQ. II" 3/4"x34" 297 II 30-0-8T 30' II 8.0" TO 3.2" 11.0"SQ. II" I"x 40" I 297 19 35-0-8.5T 35'' II 8.5" TO 3.6" 12.0' SQ. 11 1/2" 1"x 40" 349 17 ***40-0-9T 40' I1 9.0 TO 3.5" 12.38 SQ. 12 1/2 I x 40" 392 17 40 -O -9-7T 40' 7 9.0"TO 3.5" 12.38"SQ. 12 1/2" I"x 40" 511 25 ADD GA. AFTER CATALOG NO. IF GALVANIZED POLE IS DESIRED. DENOTE TENON SIZE (0.D. ONLY) IF OTHER THAN 2 3/8': ALL WELDS BY CERTIFIED WELDERS. PIPE TENON OR DRILLED C6 -------"'I 6) ROUND HOLE lIP TOP DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASA (USA) SPECIFICATIONS 100 M.P.H. WINDS ( 55,000 YIELD) - ANCHOR BOLTS .. 1 1GROUT 1. PRIMED, POWDER COATED, POLE 404mw ak OR GALVANIZED A BASE DETAIL 3"x 511x .237"WALL REINFORCED HAND HOLE 1 GROUND LUG 1 „ OPPOSITE HAND HOLE ( l"x /4 x 4"BAR,%�— 16 UNC HOLE ) Space between pole base plate and top of concrete foundation must be filled with GROUT or wind warranty is void. WIS ROUND TAPERED STEEL POLE LIGHTING SYSTEMS P.O. Box 100519 Fort Worth, Texas 76185 800633-8711 Fax 817.735-4824 MULCH 2' FOAM INSULATION PLANTING SOIL WICK SYSTEM POROUS MEMBRANE GRAVEL / STONE \J� u � RESERVOIR FILL PIPE PIPE STRAP OVERFLOW DRAIN LINE ! RESERVOIR DRAIN LINE The Reservoir System The unique Reservoir System helps conserve water and reduce maintenance while nurturing healthy plantings. A hidden fill -pipe directs water to the roots as insulation and fabric wicks combine to provide continuous moisture and reduce evaporation. Two drain lines eliminate over watering. Planters which accept the Reservoir System are identified. nique planters Zell -shaped planters 30" TF4030 — 30" Dia. x 18" 18" 410 lbs. - Options: Al, B1 Shown in: Misty Gray w/ Gray Matrix 36" TF4035 36" Dia. x 24" 24"690 lbs. Options: Al, B1 Shown in: Tan w/ Gray Matrix *Accepts Reservoir System 36" TF4145 36" Sq. x 27" 720 lbs. 27" Options: Al Shown in: Tan w/ Gray Matrix 72" TF4135 w/Level Ring 72" Dia. x 36" 3s° 3550 lbs. Options: Al, B1 — Shown in: Tan w/ Gray Matrix 13 54" 1 TF4140 54" Dia. x 20" — 1000 lbs. 20"Options: Al, B1 _ Shown in: French Gray Weatherstone 36" TF4040 36" Dia. x 27" 27„ 690 lbs. Options: Al — Shown in: Tan w/ Gray Matrix CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tom Lawell, City Adminis MEMO July 6, 1995 SUBJECT: Add On Agenda for July 6th Council Meeting Information originally indicated as Available Wednesday is attached. See Item number 5a (*). Additional information is submitted to Items 7a. and 8g. (**) . One new item has been added to the Unfinished and New Business Section. See Item 8i 3. Agenda Adoption It is recommended that Council adopt the revised agenda printed on yellow paper. 5a. Acknowledgment of the June 14th Airport Relations Commission Minutes. Please see attached minutes. 7a. Emerson Avenue Street Vacation Please see attached map of Emerson Avenue Street Right -of -Way alignment. 8g. Case No. 95-05: Tharaldson Enterprises - CUP for Restaurant in the I Zone Please see attached letters from Northwest Airlines. 8i. Update on Marie/Lexington Pond Maintenance Project. See attached memo from Jim Danielson. MTL:kkb 1 IVY FALLS SOUTH ADDITION NO SCALE N ' % X4,45 G. 41 9-1 CP" to BUTLER AVE. W, Q Z Q yl ARK DR. A. LA. IVY FALLS AVE. 1-1 c„o • W OC Q J W a EMERSON -Z R R Y� FARM [DAL tC- DR.] BLUFF CIR.Q�� l H CIR. z CAREN C461€ t RO DIANE pi\\ 3% DJ0 0 or Q 0 DEER tRPP DEER TRAIL T. WENTWOR EVER REC"\ P U PROJECT QP C: 0 LOCATION KNOLLWOOD LANE STREET SECTION y 16'/' 30' 16 'it TACK EL. STREET '♦_• ( TOP OF CURB B 618 C.E. G. II/2" WEAR 2341 2" BASE 2331 6" CL. 5 CRUSHED ROCK NORTH 6 WEST I ' SIDE OF STREET: ; U) COPPER rvtz 6Y ST PMA. MARK WITH 4x4 II IIWHEN POSSIBLE STUBS WILL CONNECT TO MANHOLE. 1; SEE PLANS FOR LOCATIONS WATER 9' MIK SKlswQlk 7• Without 3' CONC. WALK LL I-. y 3 Z J o- 5 W 0. a UTILITY EASEMENT 3 —4'CONC. WrTH 3 6x6 W.W.I!' OR d •6'CONC. WITH x NO REINFORCING • 2' SAND MARK END OF WATER & SEWER SERVICES W ITN+2 x 2's TYPICAL 17'TAIL 19' WITH SIDEWALJC EN) CF STUB 10' BELOW TOP OF CURB 4' SDR 26 PVC SANITARY SERVICE NOTEIVY LANE– STREET SECTION = 27' FACE TO FACE W/ WATERMAIN 5' NORTH OF CENTERLINE EASY TO REMOVE CAP OR PLUG 63 9 IVY FALLS WEST ADDITION VANDAL L. S CUTL0TS 7 6 SBM CHERRY HILL (`e I I I t ADDITION H MN KNOLLW00D LANE E. \ \ 6 IS 14 3 9 BHMH 2 } BHMH 0 t N NO SCALE V9 N DALL S OUT LOT 2ND AVE W w PROJECT SITE MAP CASTING DETAILS EENAN CASTING No.2561. A OR APPROVED EQUAL. 24' • 4 DIA. OPENING TYPICAL SECTION BEEHIVE MANHOLE P SOD AND TOP 301L SLOPE. TO DRAIN z .71 4 6 MIN 22 MAY m' Lity of Mendota Heights 1101 VICTORIA CURVE • MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 IVY FALLS SOUTH GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS THE 1988 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (AS AMENDED BY THE MAY 2, 1994, SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS) SHALL GOVERN SHEET /. BEFORE EXCAVATION CHECK UTILITY LOCATIONS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL GAS: Northern States Power ELECTRICAL: Northern States Power TELEPHONE: US West Dial "0" Ask Operator for Zenith 2345 CABLE TV: Continental Cablevision 292-0118 ST. PAUL WATER UTILITY - Engineering Inspection & Testing 266-6210 MENDOTA HEIGHTS PUBLIC WORKS 454-4059 MENDOTA HEIGHTS ENGINEERING DEPT Design, Survey & Inspection 452-1850 454-(XX)2 221-4444 221-4444 DESCRIPTION TITLE PAGE, PROJECT LOCATION MAP, PROJECT S/TE MAP, AND DETAILS 2. SAM TARY SEWER 8 WATER'tAA I N - KNOL LWOOD LANE 3 STORM SEINER 8 STREETS - KNCLLWOOD LANE 4 STORM SEWER IN EASEMENTS, STREETS 8 WA TERMA /N - IVY LANE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DATE REG.NO ENGR APPROVED 19 MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL JOB 9511 IMP 95-3 SHEET No. 1 of 4 SHEETS 1 N STA 0+09 121R REMOVE 6" PLUG INSTALL 6" GV a BOX STA O+19 12' R 8" x 6" INCREASER STA 0+34 I2' R 8"x 111/4° BEND 44t 1 NG �i:''pkv 0p E N9IN G� `NQaNP c,oAo-c &a '(G , \ PPS� 2 it 1414 3. STA 5+40 10'L 8" x II 1/4° BEND e,? STA 4+16.6 10' R 8"x 22 '/2 BEND \ \ n .q 0 900 895 890 STA 4 + 84 8" x 221/2 BEND 13 #1431 I6 LLOOQ. 15 # I43 -J 14 # 1439 LANE 4,, t - 900 SCALE PLAN: I 50' PROFILE HORIZ. • I"=50' VERT., I 5' REVISED TO SHOW AS -BUILT CONDITIONS DATE: ff H r cr CC 885 t 0. z 0 0 1- Q co o u) a 8 X a 1) 0 8 i OUSTING .....� 4-.-«: 8 8" I : ........... WATERMAIN 8 +.. v.6.SP • 4S- 8'pvc: 860 864:25 ....... 5- 8:64::7.3: it pV C. e i40% I-. N I U 0 N- S70-013 SE -870:€8 4" -BERM( 870:58 IW -87563 E- 875.73 8 4"SERVICE:::86513 ................. 0+00 + 00 2 + 00 3 + 00 + 00 5 + 00 6+00 7 +CC 860 ICity of �1.u�1 Mendota Heights IVY FALLS SOUTH WATERMAIN a SANITARY SEWER 1101 VICTORIA CURVE • MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 (612) 452-1850 Proj. No. JOB 9511 IMP 95-3 Sheet No. 2 of 4 Sheets �5 •REMC) VE: BITUMINOHS a BIT CURB MILL 1N .:-,r41 /I, AS DIRECTEC a SOC PE (PE- . RIVEN:. ;i A;: ;!I . E• • << 1 F \r REMOVE 8 RELAY 12' - IS" RCP f 1 .9 'lss i 0 ' PC=0+19.38 PT=Ot 60.44 A = 13°04' 16" D = 31.8310 R = 180' L = 41.06' T = 20.62' 2 *1414 1 .0 0 C6IA STA 2.86 132'L GUTTER=87B 37 INV: 875.00 #1442 *1438 0 & .i i. i2, 00\0 CB 24 STA 3+55 16 2'R GUTTER= 879.13 INV=875.13 0. •1 S �Sy C\ CBMH4 STA4+60 14.5'R GUTTER= 882.40 iNV.=872.24 V N #t1 5 q30 PC= 4+ 16.65 PT= 5+65.57 A = 55° 02'47" D = 36.9650 R = 155' L = 148.91' T = 80.77' L. P o9 C� .1434 2ND AVENUE r5• RCP ,EE SHt�, FOR STOPM SEWER \� i 1121 CP@ 0.32%_ 35.8 16 IS 6319 I a5 2 IC D"7 FPO J W 7 53.06 3. CURB CUT 25 R� 0 -'Bj TFinc -VE,l (FIELD 0OCA # X459 11 #1443 # 1435 14 * 1439 13 KNk L.L.1 90 -7- VPI- 0+2 895 890 8 880 875 870 EXISTING.t.:ORgpE EX. 8 8"- RCP:::._ J N cf 6 Q H vti h N VPI = 3+90 EL= 879:50 U, t NI -4.0885 J in VPI•= 6+00 EL . X1:90:00 VC.±100' M•=-0:29'5 VPI ..:..7+.50. EL -893:96 VC =100' M --0:205 C V Q W 0 J D 5 EL- 89L38 900 11,1"=-0,0 NORTH SCALE- Plan:1"=50' Profile: Horiz. I"=5d Vert. I"=5' REVISED AS -BUILT Date= TO SHOW CONDITIONS 900 8 G9.42 #-•874:07 WL874.6 t4-..67.1:6:2 W-874:00 R72 ,14 895 875 895 890 885 870 880 5 870 0+00 I - OG 0+00 +00 2+ 00 3+00 4+00 5 + 00 6 + 00 7+00 1+00 2+00 3*00 y o£/VY endota Heights FALLS SOUTH92ft STORM SEWER 6 STREET CONSTRUCTION 1101 VICTORIA CURVE • MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 (612) 452-1850 Proj. No. JOB 9511 IMP 95 - 3 Sheet No. 3 o r\) 6"x 6" WET TAP BY ST PAUL WATER STA 0+20 51 8"x 6" INCREASER 4, 17 8 )(A\ 60 / Cee>e° °D\CIDd 9,1c 1 t? \c) .C500 6, 0 -1 9:•• Dicq' K RESTORE CHERRY HILL ROAD N AS SPECIFIED REMOVE 301 9" V CSP AND BULKHEAD SAN MH ) 11c .N\ 570N \ 0 N 880 8 870 8 8 0 (5) p '<-SOD AREA AROUND APRON IVY AN SEE SHEET 3 SOD AREA AROUND APRON \ A A * 445 SOD AREA AROUND MH BHMH 7 BHMH 6 EX BH MH 2ND AVE X SWMH Ex 15" RCP RESTORE CLEMENT STREET tr) AS SPECIFIED 711-. r rT1 \\ A EX BHMH ............................. : ............................. RCP 885 880 875 870 8 872.62 120'--12). Re 872:24 S 884.3 90 REFORM MANHOLE INVERT 885 SCALE PLAN' I" - 50' PROFILE: HORIZ.' 1'1=50 VERT. :111.5' REVISED TO SH OW AS -BUILT CONDITIONS DATE 80 75 70 PLACE. :CIL ON...flLTEP....F'ABRJC 65 ... 0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 City of Mendota Heights IVY FALLS SOUTH STORM SEWER AND EASEMENTS IVY LANE STREETS SWATERMAIN 1101 VICTORIA CURVE • MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 (612) 452-1850 JOB 9511 IMP 95-3 Sheet No. 4 of 4 Sheets I' /\/ I V I ?\, N79.1 E 1471' -r_ -7 \G' _\' _ 7 \ \ \ \ 6o C N8 64 2•b5"E r -A I I , I /-\L_L_C .7744.36"E 142• a=13°04' 16" L=34.22 / 7 \ A - 4y0 / L= 26.83 A=03°04'30" / / .3 2 IVY FALLS SOUTH IA/r-^-r- VV L_I M w 1� U1 / - - N. LINE LOT 6 & S. LINE LOT 7, VANDALS v / N89'20' 18"E -284.40 - - <1 I _1- • C� C C I _ A r -N -r- IN I /-\ I I 1 \J I N ` 60 L. UTLOTS TO DAKOTA COUNTY - - -- N N - 79.07 tiyo9% / / \ ti`' A 7 !l,A�1cs• 5� .Q9y)j V 4 1. 0 i C C N /. / / n N \Oo 96.49 / / / \‘' /S5l / 3 / 7 I / / /55 \� N / `' \/ / / I II 4 / i 18 / / to 9 �O / / N 1 16 .e N \ \1/456' 1°-a J 6° b--:-.:„.-' 7?0N°`'Q�, 0 0004 gA.28 <„,„,,,, °9 R I IpRa�2a� A J �- Lr 43 36 \ 6' 112.17 L� \ P R. , N89°50'31"W sxie\6p /s 0 s6°�'47e M I KNOLLWOOD LANE 'a.os s �_ 195.63 O ' / 589°50'31"E / 5 187.91 O / M I I 99.94 SS e0 c...; 131 rri0 6- r` 0 ri 589°40'54"E 131.37 I W I r - n 101.56 6 F29.81 2 ^T A' /r IA/F -^T I /-\ V L_ . V V L_ ..� I 94.23 R' 23.80- - 7 NN z 6z C\ G \ 112.25 / // / L=35.58 I o=11°01'12" / / / /2 15 - - - - - 0 63.19 - 135.38 N 0 53.06 N89'38'53"E 350.00 A > - N I o z i o I \ tal0 O - o M 14 0 M. Z to O j I- in0 cc w V^ 0 W SE COR. LOT 6, VANDALS OUTLOTS TO DAKOTA COUNTY r / / 0 I / / s, - I0 0 0) L 14 o o 104.55 0I 0 NI N J 10\ 0 N 131.40 9 '1 \g- o 71e25'10' l0 0 13 L 123.66 OI 0 of UI A rr J 12 N ° 109.46 10 10 60 I 7-13-q5- ,t(erv, sl,. CR, DDC, ND. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: 50 L5 5 II 10 L ►- 1 � BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED AND ADJOINING LOT LINES, AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES, AND BLOCK LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. 100 SCALE 13176 N89°20'31"W V U) 0 N I 0 131.76 • V j m 241.22 N89°20'31"W Io 10 11 A L - 732.52 - - \ \ _ - DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT - \ N89.50'31 "W IN J X21.14 60 256.64 O FEET NORTH O DENOTES 1/2 INCH X 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT, SET MARKED BY REGISTRATION NO. 16099, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. I DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND. * DENOTES CAST IRON JUDICIAL LANDMARK FOUND, SET PURSUANT TO DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 55627. L' A I I INI f \/-\LLI I N nr-A J)i ) A N I(\r n Ar_ -N I -r I \1./-\I \I \/-\I N\7L_IVIL_I N I L) A j)E)ANI/'r_-1, Dv"! I\I\\IV\7L_IVIL_IN I i'r- I /T1/NI</ Ci I bL_\ -. C IVI I I F1 N I O\JL-`LJI V I"I\JI N NI/1 1 V\J. A4ouc h 1m.tS, Ons Planners Engineers Surveyors Designers Archeologists SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS I. SET POSTS AND EXCAVATE A 4"X4" TRENCH UPSLOPE ALONG THE LINE OF POSTS. 3. ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC TO THE WIRE FENCE AND EXTEND IT INTO THE TRENCH. 2- STAPLE WIRE FENCING TO THE POSTS - 4. BACKFILL AND CCM/PACT THE SOIL. CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM I. INSPECTION — SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED II•EDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REWIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. REPLACEMENT — FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN IT DECOMPOSES OR BECOES INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. SEDIMENT REMOVAL — SEDIMENT DEPOSITS S OLD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED AMEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY ONE—HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. SILT FENCE SILTFENC NORTH F / / SOUTH ,(TRIP LINE OF PINES / PINE 16 IN 4 / 895.0 MIN.BSMT. 887.0 ROCK ENT', PAD (SEE D NCE TAIL) 864.16 853.61 TEMPOR SEDIMENT PO EXCAVAT TO LEV.-S 0. 8' BITUMINOUS PATH -GA GE TO BE REMO ED r A A r\rl %,i\1 rte., ; iLi %er I F S V Y A L L S 0 U T H CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS OBNER/ DFVELJJPFR HEAVER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN SHUT INDEX SHEET TITLE Cl -1 CI -2 C3-1 C4-1 C8-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SOILS MAP PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT t hereby certify that this pion, speclrlcallan or report mom prepared by me or under my direct •upervlelen am that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Innual a. mc`�/b1// /� Reg. Na/ / e DDatte 7—/a/gr DATE REVISION 4-19-95 PER CITY REVIEW 5-31-95 REV. GRADING & RETAINING WALLS 7-10-95 FINAL GRADING PLAN SUBMIT TTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW: BY• DATE: teareflegfr nie. Planners • Engineers • Surveyors • Designers • Archeologists 9200 Bemlact lane. Sale M0. Ia$e Grows Ylvaepq 5536S -S$2 Telephone: (II2)421-5505 Per (612)424-5812 0 1984 LOGAN AND HUGHES PROPERTY FINAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN PROJECT NO 03-1 95109 -5- ces J s'" aD�Eo OtSLER�YS/ / / SUITABLE BEARING SOIL 0-5' I' HOLD DOWN 12' HOLD DOW BASEMENT FLOOR=92.0 STRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) 25' 25' GARAGE FLOOR.100.0 r— 6TOPSOIL MIN. 5 STRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) \ FULL BASEMENT (FB) / BASEMENT FLOOR=92.0 GARAGE FLOOR =100.0 SUITABLE BEARING SOIL 10' R/W R/W 6" TOPSOIL MIN. —74— 6' TOPSOIL/MIN. / / / / SUITABLE BEARING SOIL STRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) \ SUITABLE BEARING SOIL FULL BASEMENT WALK -OUT (WO) 1.5' HOLD DOWN / SUITABLE BEARING SOIL 6 TOPSOIL MIN. BASEMENT FLOOR -92.O GARAGE FLOOR.I00.0 L6' TOPSOIL MIN. 1.5' HOLD COW 5. C 15' STRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) / / ` STRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) R/W \ STRUCTURAL COMPACTED �\ FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) \ SUITABLE BEARING SOIL FULL BASEMENT LOOK -OUT (LO) STRUCTURAL COMPACTED FILL IF REQUIRED (TYP) GRADING/EROSION CONTROL NOTES I. Where soil corrections and/or filling of—way, the backfill material shall be moisture density relationship of soils three feet (3') of the backfill which An independent testing firm shall test and provide the results of these tests occur within the street right— compacted to 95% of the standard (ASTM D-698-70) except the top shall be compacted to 100% density. the street section In fill areas to the City, engineer and Client. 2. The contractor shall install silt fence prior to commencing grading activities and shall maintain said fence for duratiion of construction activities. 3. The contractor shall on the grading plan. ordinances. limit his activities to the grading limits shown All construction activities shall comply with local 4. The contractor shall schedule his operations to minimize the disturbed area at any given time. 5. All disturbed non—street areas shall be restored with a minimum of 4" of top soil and seed or sod as directed by the Engineer, within 72 hours of completion of grading activity in that peticular area. a. All seed, sod, mulch and fertilizer shall conform with the following Mn/DOT specifications, as modified below: Item Sod Seed Mulch (Type I, disc anchored) Fertilizer General Placement Specification Number 3878 3876 3882 3881 2575 b. The seed mixture shall consist of a Mn/DOT type 500 unless noted elsewhere on plan. 6. Following street construction, the developer shall clean street on on ongoing basis as required by the City. 7. Rip—rap shall be placed at all storm sewer outlets under the utility contract and shall conform with applicable City and Watershed District standards and specif icot ions. 8. Vertical grading tolerance grading plan. All streets plan. I. SET POSTS AND EXCAVATE A 4"x4" TRENCH UPSLOPE ALONG THE LINE OF POSTS. 3. ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC TO THE WIRE FENCE AND EXTEND IT INTO THE TRENCH. 2. STAPLE WIRE FENCING TO THE POSTS. (IN HIGH FLOW AREAS ONLY). 4. BACKFILL AND COMPACT THE SOIL. CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE SILT FENCE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM I. INSPECTION — SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. REPLACEMENT — FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY WHEN I INEFFECTIVE BEFORE THE BARRIER IS NO LONGER NECESSARY. 3. SEDIMENT REMOVAL — SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY THE BARRIER. for lots shall be within 0.2 feet of the City approved shall be within 0.1 feet of the City approved grading 9. Hay Bales shall be placed around Catch Basins until turf is established (SEE DETAIL) 10. The Pond must be constructed as the first grading operation LOT NUreER Ii CONSTRUCTED NfISE PAD LIMITS SETBACK REOV MEMENTO 2L FRONT !ILSIDE NOISE T5' SIDE GARAGE LOT DIIENSION GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION CURB OR EDGE Or PAVEMENT OATEN BASIN STREET PROPOSED LOT CORNER ELEVATION !LOOK NUMBER SPOT ELEVATION 4 DRAINIGE DRAINAGE ARROWS GRADE Al REM Or ROUSE PAO TYPE FB FInt IPSDE:NT F!OUL OALKT FULL D$LOOK-OUT ALK-G SE SPLIT ENTRY SENO SPLIT ENTRY Vt.NAUT 5 -LO SIDE LOOKOUT SETBACK TEwIREIENT LOT CORER LOT GRADING DETAIL M Hard surface public rood NOTE: Rock such I" to 2" Washed rock size should be I" to 2" in size os MnDOT CA—I or CA -2 course aggregate. A geotexti to fabric may be used under the rock to prevent migration of the underlying soil into the stone. ROCK ENTRANCE TO CONSTRUCTION SITE PLYCSI TE LOT PROFILE T DECOMPOSES OR BECOMES AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. ONE—HALF THE HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE DETAIL NO GAPS ALLO E 9 LDIRECTIM OF FLOW 01 STREET LOT BENCHING DETAIL PLACE FLAT CN GRADE WHEN PLACED ON PAVED SURFACE AND MOUND SOIL 6' HIGH AROUND PERIMETER 0 STRAW BALE TYP. STRAW BALE 1 '. !1114 QIQ III" il'I�I III il�9�� 11=11-11 =11�1111=11 IMBED 6" WEN PLACED ON EARTH SURFACE ISA3' REBAR TWO (2) EACH BALE EXTENDED B' INTO SOIL/PAVEMENT NOTE: INSTALL AHD MAINTAIN AROUND CATCH BASINS UNTIL TURF IS ESTABLISHED CATCH BASIN SILT PROTECTION BALES TEMPORARY SLOPE BLOCK I V Y F A L L S S O U T H CITY O F MEND 0 T A HEIGHTS OWNER/DEVEIAPER HEAVER DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION U.S_MAN T 4HEFT SHEET INDEX TITLE C1 -I CI -2 C3-1 C4-1 C8 -I EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SOILS MAP PRELIMINARY TREE PRESERVATION PLAN PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT I barfly eeNNS that IAM plan sp•olhytba er report was prepared by —. or under my direct auperMabt aM that I am a duly registered Professional RoglamorrtOar IM Ian et the Stateorients Dais 74eAr DATE REVISION QUALITY MANAGEMENT REVIEW: BY: DATE OI���i�r,ll\i7 Ci saki., ., one Planners • Engineers • Surveyors • Designers • Archeologists Turn Hemlock lase, suite 505. Mule Grum INsenta 55959-5592 Telephne: (512$24-5505 hr. (512)424-5522 fiff le94 GRADING DETAILS PROJECT NO C3-2 95-109