The URL can be used to link to this page

2016-01-04 Council Workshop Packet� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL GOAL SETTING WORKSHOP AGENDA Monday, January 4, 2016 — 3:00 p.m. Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call To Order—Roll Call 2. Discussion Topics a. Development i. Discussion of Industrial Area Study Results ii. AUAR For Vikings Development iii. Public Development Tools iv. Discussion of Preliminary Review of Major Developments b. Rental Housing Licensing c. Department Studies i. Engineering ii. Police d. Environment i. Pollinator Friendly Communities ii. Inflow Infiltration Sump Pump Strategy e. City of Mendota Heights 2016 Legislative Priorities 3. Other Topics 4. Adjourn page 3 �c� �,� :, c�,�� „e�,�_ i i � r� ��•�� 651.452185�� phone � �S1A52,8940 lax, ` www.mendota heights.com _ _ � � CITY OF M�N��TA H�I�HT� DATE: January 4, 2016 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Goal Setting Workshop Background Memo COMMENT: INTRODUCTION: On Monday, January 4t", the City Council will hold a workshop to discuss a variety of issues which have longer term impacts on the City. The meeting is scheduled to run from 3:00 until 6:00 PM. During that time, we will discuss the following: 2.a Development Topics i. Discussion of Implementation Steps for Industrial Area Study. See the attached memo from Nolan Wall. Phil Carlson of Stantec will lead a discussion of 14 recommended steps for implementation. The Council is asked to prioritize these, at least by when to pursue these— next year, within 5 years, up to 20 years, etc. ii. AUAR Review of Vikings Development. Related to the discussion of the Mendota Heights Industrial Area will be an update on the environmental studies on the Vikings development, which is across I-494 from Mendota Heights. iii. Discussion of Development Tools and Incentives. Recently, the City was approached regarding the possibility of providing Tax Increment Financing to a development on the Larson Greenhouse property--that development proposal is being withdrawn. However, a discussion of what level of City involvement for that location or selected other sites in Mendota Heights is still timely. The City Attorney's office will make a presentation at the workshop on the page 4 availability of public sector development tools, including financing options and eminent domain. iv. Preliminary Discussion of Major Developments. The Council will be asked to discuss how to consider concept ideas for larger scale developments in Mendota Heights, before an idea which does not clearly meet current zoning or guiding standards would proceed to the normal "next steps" of the development review process. 2.b. Rental Housing Licensing Police Chief Mike Aschenbrener and Planner Nolan Wall will give a presentation on recent trends on the housing of "non-traditional" individuals in residential areas of nearby communities. Some of these people are creating serious impacts on the quality of life for their neighbors, and also making problems for the City Councils and staffs of those cities. The Chief and Mr.Wall will give an overview of what Mendota Heights is currently doing, and talk about options which might be considered to avoid future problems. The City attorney may also be in attendance to comment on legal impacts. Please see attached memo from the planner. 2.c Departmental Studies i. Engineering Department. See the attached memo, which contains a recommendation that the City engage a consultant to perform a study of the city's provision and funding of the City's engineering services. If the Council concurs, action officially approving the engagement of Craig Ebeling would be on the City Council agenda the next evening. ii. Police Department. In the 2016 budget is funding for a police study. This would look at the current operation of the department, including personnel and policies, and how to best position the department for moving forward. A couple of other Dakota County Departments are also being studied at this time. After speaking with five other prospective providers of police studies over the past several months, my recommendation is to hire the McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. to perform a Police Services Study of the Mendota Heights Police Department. A copy of their proposal is attached. Again, if the Council concurs with staff's recommendation, action officially approving the hiring of the McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. would be on the City Council agenda the next evening. page 5 2.d Environment i. Pollinator Friendly Communities. In October, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended to the Council that it approve a resolution declaring Mendota Heights to be a Pollinator Friendly Community. This is intended to encourage the protection of existing habitat, and the establishment of new habitat for wildlife which pollinates plant life. Following that action, the City Council directed that the Commission review the proposal in more depth, and to return with a plan. A proposed pollinator plan is attached, along with a resolution for consideration. If the Council supports the action, this resolution would be placed for consideration at the January 5t" City Council meeting. ii. Inflow/Infiltration Sump Pump Strategy. The City Council has previously heard rationale as to why it is important for property owners to separate out sump pump discharge from going into the sanitary sewer system. While much in term of education was attempted over the past year, the reality is that only a handful of plumbing permits have been taken out to perform the separation, out of the estimated hundreds of properties which need to be re-done. Staff would like some guidance from the Council as to how to pursue this necessary, but difficult situation. Public Works Director Mazzitello has provided information in a memo, and the City of Eagan's strategy on the subject which was adopted in 2010. 2.e Legislative Priorities The Council is asked to adopt legislative priorities to relay to the City's State legislative delegation, for consideration in the 2016 session in St. Paul. Please see the attached memo. Once again, if the recommendations are agreeable to the Council, a formal set of priorities with any changes will be on the January 5t" City Council agenda to adopt. Mark McNeill City Administrator page 6 11C1 Vict�r�a Curve , Mendvta he��nts, �1N 55118 651.452.1&50 phone I 651.452.8940 fax � www.mendota-heights.com _ � T � � CITY OF MENf7�TA HEf�HT� DATE: January 4, 2016 TO: Mayor, City Council and City Administrator FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Industrial District Redevelopment Plan Implementation BACKGROUND The DRAFT Industrial District Redevelopment Plan was presented to the Ciry Council on December 15. Stantec and staff are now working to finalize the plan based on the discussion. Phil Carlson will be in attendance at the workshop to assist in facilitating a discussion on implementation strategies, as included in the attached matrix. In response to the Council discussion, also attached is a map depicting the allowable building height to airspace range within the study area. BUDGETIMPACT The consulting services contract and work plan with Stantec for this project does not include any implementation tasks. It is anticipated that staff can complete the maj ority of the tasks related to implementing the plan's recommendations. If the Council determines that additional consulting services are necessary, a separate work plan and budget would have to be developed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Council discuss and prioritize the Industrial District Redevelopment Plan's recoinmendations and direct staff accordingly. INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Imple�nentation Strategy P� '• i �. � 'i Keep the area guided and zoned for office, industrial and (1) related uses; don't make significant changes that would • No action required at this time. Ongoing interfere with its success as a business park. • Review the permitted/conditional uses in the Explore potential revisions or additions to the uses allowed Industrial Zoning District. �Z� in the park by scrutinizing and revising if necessary the list � propose ainendments as deemed necessary, to be 2016 of permitted and conditional uses in the zoning code (i.e. reviewed and recommended by the Planning adult daycare, trade schools) Commission. Explore reguiding and rezoning all or some of the front tier • Review the existing uses. of properties between Mendota Heights Road and • Review the existing permitted and conditional (3) I-494 to office — most are office, not industrial uses. The area uses in the B-zones. 5 years may benefit from a designation that encourages and allows . Determine if rezoning and Code amendments are more intense uses. practical. Explore ways to capitalize on the new Vikings facility in � Keep monitaring the development process in 5-10 years (4) Eagan to the advantage of the Mendota Heights Industrial (depending on District. cooperation with the City of Eagan. build-out scenarios) Preserve and improve the area's roadway network as � Analyze any impacts to this area from future (5) opportunities arise, avoiding changes that would diminish its Ongoing access to the regional and local netwark. projects. • Engage United Properties in discussions on the Study traffic and circulation in the viciniry of Pilot Knob development of the SE corner of the Pilot Knob Road and Northland Drive to determine if there are changes Rd./Northland Dr. intersection. (6) or improvements to that area that would allow more intense 2016 use of the currently vacant parcel in the southeast quadrant ' Collaborate with Dakota County and United of that intersection. Properties on a potential area-wide traffic study priar to 2017 County improvement project. Continue to discuss and explore improvements to transit service in the park. This might include discussions with • Contaci MetroTransit, MVTA, and Dakota Metro Transit and Dakota County about long-term transit County to discuss the issues and potential (7) service in the area; sidewalk connections to bus shelters; a solutions. 5 years circulator route to other transit stops; increased Metro . Monitor Metropolitan Council's long-term Transit bus service; or long-term discussions of BRT ar LRT transportation/transit planning efforts along I-494. Conduct a bicycle/pedestrian trail study to identify � Explore pursuing a SHIP grant to update the Trail (8) improvements and connections for bicyclists and pedestrians Improvement and Maintenance Plan. 2016 to the park and nearby parks, trails and open space. Review the city's parking standards in the zoning code and � As opportunities arise or requests come forward (9) study parking needs in the parlc, to insure that city code keeps from users, further analyze the issue. 10 years in line with changes in office or other uses in the ark. Stay current on changes in the requirements of industrial and (10) office uses generally and adjust the city's policies and • Staff and the consulting planner will monitor. Ongoing regulations as needed to respond to new developments. Continue commercial land use and zoning designations on � Discuss the vision for this property to inform (11) the City-owned Bourne Lane site, and only make a change interested development partners. 2016 if the market warrants it. �I 2� Continue to work cooperatively with Industrial Park owners, • Engage property owners, investors, and tenants Ongoing managers and tenants to keep the park successful. as necessary as issues arise. Study broadband and other technology infrastructure needs � Work with Dakota County Broadband Initiative (13) and consider investments as necessary to ensure the area is and NDC4 as appropriate. 5 years competitive and serves the business needs. • Discuss economic incentives/tools (i.e. TIF, tax Consider city policies toward redevelopment incentives to abatement, business subsidies, revolving loans, (14) potentially implement on future projects. bonds, etc.). 2016 • Determine appropriate review process for developers seeking financial assistance. � Engage Greater MSP regarding business Explore ways to communicate, brand, and promote the retention and expansion opportunities. (15) Business Park. • Work with the Dakota County Regional 2016 Chamber of Commerce to promote the existing businesses and development opportunities. r Q O w r � N m r ss P ,� � c HWY 13 __ �� MSP Airspace Zone Limit O 120' - 130' � General Site Boymr�y9 O 130' - 140' Height to Airspace � 140' - 150' � ,., Height to Airspace Range: � 150' - 160' - Up to 60' Q 160' - 170' Q 60' - 70' � 170' - 180' D O 70' - 80' � 180' - 190' � � � " D Q 80' - 90' Q 190' - 200' � '� A � 90' - 100' O 200' - 210' 0 � �, O 100' - 1 10' � 210' - 220' : a �° � � �`o O 1 10' - 120' � 220 and up ' � > � �F '��.�' .7-'r � " M� r��'�F�R •� �'1f� � 1'� � ACACIA BLVD o �, �r. , .�'.. � �t � o �^" �� . �s• � I��, :�� . �.+ r;,�. _ �,9�v o a �� •,.. 0 Y AVE ��, o�� e � / �o 90 1�0 �.�� , ' /� N`�% , `� o 'o `O O ^��/ 'o " 150' �160'� /� n, lo 0 0 � If h �� So• o \�� a O r� "+� � �G 4.� 1��70' �p S �190' o - 150; �,�, 0 � �F 5� , �� .,.��._ n I "" I 494 � d �� i'" • Height to MSP Airspace Industrial Zoning District Redevelopment Plan � 0 1,000 2,000 Feet N Source: Dakota County October 2015, MAC � � � � ... - . . �� ' ��: �.�`.F• -i<<� - �Q. .: :TORY AVE � _' t R\�` ;Z f �� - � f •.f. ( �Z�~+ X , FURLONG AVE. � +�,.� '`�" H ' KENDON LN � _ '�{ � � , . - � • r - ., i '� .�„ '- .; .�g�j.�, . . ; LAKEVIEW AVE '�4 " `� � � � �. : ' "�;, � I�... ; , �;�t� ��'f` ,4".� � �. � �� «�� ' �� l<c ? - � _ - . '', - , .�.� . �9 L 19�� I �� _.. �� I. 'I40l' � ('`�� r � \ /J 0 .M-� U �^ / ,�2_V\ �3p, �g � 1` qp, � _MENDOTA SHE�IGHTS RD o __ .�7 �r a w �.,tio w ND DR a. >> . f� u�� O N' jM . � �� l^ o b �°�� `c � � � �I � ^ho C7 �` 0 0 _ _ � � �. )'r0• Uo� o ^`�` I . � t� 7�01 ' ,. ' �':y� INq7ptiLLION.DR o-� -��,��,. � � ,o � ��. �o o � .- _ : _ ` 8�' 4 � 180' . r .�: � -. I � ': �. �� 8p� � ' ... � rh� ,iso� �� '*f�+a . a ^ v �'� I.r.... r ( O O.� ' �`° D iy . ,✓ - . \�o.. a co \, o' . �o > > �o �8 � . i 'o O o o. . —190' .. � f. p7 0 160= � 0 O �� ^9� �� -o .� ..�"-- . �� I-494 � �"• ' � �` � i � , R; , e. �� -..�...�~ � �. . - � *'ll��'�g: . �„ •,, - �. _._— . .. .,.- ' —J�.J�y 'J �, , � I .. � �� , i � �� - \, Figure 14 12/16/2015 city of �,1.� Mendota �� Heights V:�1938�active\193803260\GIS\Projects\Height to MSP Airspace.mxd �:, �� t' • ;� �' _��,��,.�_' . -� loa�n Mike Maguire Mayor Paul Bakken Cyndee Fields Gary Hansen T�� Interested Parties (Including EQB DistrEbution List) MegTilley From: Michael Ridley, AICP � Council Members Da�id M. Osberg City Administrator p��g: Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122-1810 651.675.5000 phone 651.675.5012 fax 651.454.8535 TDD Maintenance Facility 3501 Coachman Point Eagan, MN 55122 651.67�.5300 phone $51.875.5360 fax 651.454.8535 TDQ www.cityofeagan. com The Lone Oak 7ree The symbol of strength and growth in our community. page 10 City Planner, City of Eagan (Responsible Go�ernmental Unit} December 28, 2015 Reference: Draft Order for Re�iew and Comment of Scoping En�ironmental Assessment Worksheet: MVZ Ventures L�C. Alternati�e Urban Area-Wide Re�iew [AUAR} for a corporate headquarters, training facility and surroUnding mixed use de�elopment Enclosed is the Scoping Environmental Assessment Works}�eet (EAW) for an Alternati�e Urban Areawide Review [AUAR} in the City of Eagan, Minnesota. This 5coping EAW is submitted to you for your review and comment as part of the Alternati�e Urban Area-Wide Re�iew (AUARj process as described in Minnesota Administrative Rules 4410.3610. Subp. 5a. The purpose of this re�iew is described as folfows in Subp. SaB: Prior to final approval of the order for review pursuant to subpart 3, the RGU must canduct a pubiic process to r�cei�e comm�nts about the scope of the re�iew. �he RGE� shall prepare a draft arder for review and distribute and provide notice of its a�ailability in the same manner as fior an EAW pursuant to part4410.1500. The draft orc#er for re�iew must include the in�armatiar� specified in subpart 3 and a description of the specific large project or projects ta be inciudecf in the re�iew comparable to that o# a scoping EAW p�rsuant to part 4410.210Q, subpart 2. The purpose of the commertts on a 5coping EAW for an AUAR is described in Minnesota Administrative Rules 4410.3610. Subp. 5aC. as follows: Government units and ir�terested persons shali participate in the public comment process in accardance with part 4410.1600, except that the purpose af the page 11 comments is to suggest additianal de�elopment scenarios and rele�ant issues to be analyzed in the review. Comments may suggest additional de�elopment scenarios that include alternatives to the specific large project or projects propased to be included in the re�iew, including de�elapment at sites outside of the proposed geographic boundary. The comments must pro�ide reasons why a suggeste� development scenario or alternati�e to a specific project is potentially en�ironmentally superior to those identified in the RGU's draft arder. A copy ofthis Scoping EAW has been officially submitted to the Minnesota Enrrironrr�ental Qua�ity Board for publication of its a�ailabiiity for review in the EQB Monitor an January 4, 2016. The 30-day public comment period will begin on January 4, 2016 and will close on February 3, 2016. AUAR Area The AUAR area that is the subject site of this re�iew is located in the City of Eagan at the southeast corner af I-494 and �one Oak Parkway. The boundary of the AUAR area is depicted below: r� 4' � I "�' � .. �� : i- ;ti:�,'� 'y i r ; � - � R �-��a;,�� Ii �` �Fr� � I. � �� ` �. ; I ' a � "":�.:_.__ � ..... ��'. ,-.J«:'�,w..�`rc+w.nc..�cy: t' _ . . _ � v.. < • "'Y}+ fh -� �d1 -L. �•. .�pCGK-,;i� f' .y/i'�.. . �= r. - i � �..�}ra��«�t t _ �r��h . _ 1�. A�: p' r� A V � `.1� � 5 �• � ` F } 'X� � � +/hC �� ,.. � �' �' �, _ � � � *�l'� �� ' � ,� * } E �j, ��s- iv �� #�i � � f . � ��s-: a :; y:-' r '�4� �. ..'' F s'-i.�, �� ,� �� '� 51 k �� . ; J �-' � � � ' a s �' ..� w L'"�'CY ,� Y�� p, � µf+ �� '� r+� J i� �� i1 t;�, � � � '� � , � � yr .: ir �i ' , ' � � �, . �,-- �y' ,y r { Y � --p. �� 7 � �"L� ��a. ��+y . , � #k. °+,' : ' . �� r � <, `. . � �.�,. :� �� -�.'� tr�r'h�J - a . . — ..��--�a`'"'�.9 - 4�. +. Praposecf De�elapment Scenarios AIIAR Ana: bddlnD Cond9ior�s Yltr�osAlMnd#velAbm NBrnVfOe Revlaw � 0 d00 1�000 r� � ^'iwlunwofmMnY � vorcalW�er oecn,+c..zs.a.a � 5ta�ec �.nu�.m+r,�uwr.u....p�n�.,..�,� page 12 The AUAR includes the re�iew of a specific project. The Minnesota Vikings are proposing to develop new facilities for the team, including an athletic/recreational complex with a stadium and corporate facilities. The mixed-use, phased project wEll include new residential and commercial development, trails and apen space. The AUAR will evaluate three developme�t scenarios with varying magnitudes. The table below shows these scenarios and the potential magnitude of each land use e�aluated under each scenario. Scenario 1 represents allowable development under the City of Eagan's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Scenarios 2 and 3 represent fand uses proposed for the Minnesota Vikings praject (see proposed Site Plan] that are also subject of a Comprehensive Plan amendment. This amendment was appro�ed by the Eagan City Council and is under review by the Metropolitan Council. Scenario 2 represents the lower end of the potentia! intensity of uses and Scenario 3 represents a maximum intensity of uses related to the Minnesota Vikings project and future phases of de�elopment. 5cenar[o 1: Scenario 2 5cenarlo 3: Adopted Gomprehensive Plan Proposed Comprefiensive Plan Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Amendment Mrndmum Buildouf Land Use totc! area totaE area tota! area mapmum height maximum height maximum height �otal SF 1.889,000 sF 2,780,006 sf 3,110,Od0 sf 800 attacheo units 1,100 attached uniis Multi-farnily residential a 980,OOOsf 1,170,000 sf units 4-6 stories 46 stories 330,000 sf {all three facilitiesj 330,000 sf �all Shree facifitiesj Corpora!e Heodquarters Headquarters: 2-3 stories Headquar}ers: 2� sto� ies Stadium � I ndoor Practice Facility: 105-120 ft I ndoor Practice Facility: 105-7 20 ft I ndoor Frainir.g Faeility 5tadiurre 35-55 ft Stadium: 3�55 Et 8D,000 sf 100,000 sf Hotel � 5-8 staries, 150 ft 5-8 sfories. ] 50 fi � 90,000 sf 220,�00 sf Canference Center � 5-8 siories. 1 SO ft 5-8 stories, 150 ft — 220.00Q sf 220.00D sf Retai� 0 2-4 stories, BS ft (residenflal or office 2-4 stories. 85 f# (residential or office above ground f�oar retail) above ground floor reta:f] 1,889.000 sf 98C,000 sf 1,280,000 sf Office. Med!cal Office �$25.579 sf eps�ing at 3 storiesj �15 stories, 225 ft 3-15 stories, 225 ft The proposed site plan depicting fuil build-out of the de�elopment area is depicted herE: page 13 Written responses must be recei�ed by 4:04 P.M. Wednesday February 3, 2016. Michael 1. Ridley, AICP City Planner Address: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5650 Fax: 651.675.5694 Email:mridley@cityofeagan.com Attachments: EA/EAW Distribution List page 14 Scoping Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), MVZ VENTURES LLC. Alternative U rba n Area-Wide Review (AUAR) MINNESOTA VIKINGS FACILITIES & MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT December 23, 2015 � page 15 ENVIRONMENTALASSESSMENTWORKSHEET FORM Ju1y2013version This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW and AUAR Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website at: http://www.eab.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. This EAW form is being used to conduct and document the scope of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for a mixed use development in Eagan, MN. An AUAR is an alternative to an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that responds to the questions on the EAW form to the level of analysis similar to an EIS. Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610, subp. 4 states that "the content and format [of an AUAR document] must be similar to that of an EAW, but must provide for a level of analysis comparable to that of an EIS for impacts typical of urban residential, commercial warehousing, and light industrial development and associated infrastructure." The twenty-one questions in the EAW form provide information about proposed development scenarios within the AUAR area, existing conditions, existing plans, potential issues to explore through the AUAR process, and specific methodologies for special studies that will be conducted for the AUAR (i.e., the scope of the Traffic Impact Study). The EAW and AUAR Guidelines provide additional details and resources for completing the EAW form for an AUAR and conducting the AUAR review process. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the document in the EQB Monitor. 1. Project title: Minnesota Vikings Facilities and Mixed Use Development 2. Proposer: 3. RGU Contact person: Pat Mascia Contact person: Michael J. Ridley, AICP Title: Attorney Title: City Planner Address: 2200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: 612.382.9714 Fax: 612.977.8650 Email: pmascia@briggs.com Address: 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Phone: 651.675.5650 Fax: 651.675.5694 Email:mridley@cityofeagan.com 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionarv: X EIS (AUAR) Scoping Citizen petition Mandatory EAW RGU discretion Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610: • Subpart 5a - Additional procedures required when certain large specific projects reviewed. Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.4300: • Subpart 32 - Mixed residential and industrial-commercial projects; and Subpart 34 - Sports or entertainment facilities. 2 page 16 5. Project Location: County: Dakota County City/Township: Eagan, MN PLS Location ('/4,'/4, Section, Township, Range): Section l, Township 27N, Range 23W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Eagan-Inver Grove Heights Watershed Management Organization GPS Coordinates: 44°51 '39.0"N, 93°07'02.2"W Tax Parcel Number: 104570200010, 104570200020, 104570100020, 105227500010, 104570201010,104570200030,104570101011,104570101012 At a minimum attach each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project; • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); and • Site plans showing all significant project and natural features. Pre-construction site plan and post- construction site plan. 3 Figure 5-1 Project Location in Dakota County n '�a Y �� n�� • ; y � tr � + ,5 saQ.� 4��D�� : � � :...._ �!&dP�,t" �� ; � 52 � a•, '�' � � � � � fj � r ! � ' � ` � r � .•�.`, � r +�, r.�. �1f� . 1 MiF f � .=}.`Eaaetn@ � � ;i;,. {�!!@t=:§ � 1 �� ✓�w 9 'r� _.. "��t.?. _ � s armingtc-r _�. •-" ..-Cb�dY�� . � .�pkT•? T'��; � ..' ,� .� �..Tr... '�� I ■ � ' �_ I ` __ � ; r- �'. � ,� �reka Twp. ,,,, li_•-Rock Twp � I' _ - � I � � _,-- I � 1.,_�� _ � �._.,� � �Rant � °ntaleriord Twp. '�ju■� ' Greenvale T•n �•. ■ I • f' � — _ ■ . � _ � = s Sciota FwW. � I � s i ti�i��.f��...��....��.��i��u�I � . :�iYlin�rr I 'ac:s-�� 9�pn-Tw 52 a9 ,ric�R Ne i:�€ri�+tan Twpe tl � f�u as�;3f�-f� 9 - page 17 �► u �$�t - r� � � � � � � „ . > - F+°.ikV+�l�il6'1.�'a�ip7■ � , � �,..,,' 1 tl 61 � � f� � � �� f� ■■��■• 1 ■ .Trier_. '� f�liase�ill� L?r:Ue�:�ias Twp: � /� 1 '...� ..�...�...�.� �: Project Location in Dakota Coun#y Vikings Alternative Urban Areawide Review - AUa.R Area City of Eagan ...�. December 2, 2015 '� D 4 8 �� Dakptp County Boundary •■ Municipal Boundary �� jy Miles � Source: DNR, �akoia Co�nty, Clty of Eagan November 2015 �pe�l Water V:\193$\adive\193803389\GIS\Projects\Co�niy.mxd 4 page 18 Figure 5-2 U.S. Geological Survey _ c �., ti,. �J� �r � � . �� , . . , „ , , m r� .�' u y r,� E t �,.�...� /, / �,,4 - sr � } � �_ �+ � � � r ti Iw _ � .� r,- �� '�-y �d ., i ..o.w /�:� r� �� I f'� } .� � � k } _� ,� �_'... J ,� / $ `� �p .'� ll� . p ' �+ _ ' �` ' = ' � � _ , fp ' � �� Vf - _�� • ' �l $ " �'� r / ��f�M3. .— . _ - . � F ' �cs �I� �l � . f�� :fi� 'r:.i � � L • !� f 4a- �. _ 15S�,eR � �--b 7E y � .t f fi � r ,.sr�""' �� `� ,�� '1 �..� � ic' l ��i �� 1.. � EI Tf�s-�. � f4 o- � - it �,, .� . � � �. x .,�-:.-�� 4 � . � {y � �x'.V'-�` `i } -- �� ., � �'I I. ��3� ��- � � �: ��~� 4;.��52 ,�h�w:� � v � T" �:�� '-". � A . v ,�-. - �z'� � � �� b ` y i �" - _ � r � �� : �.L. � � F:_ s xle�nn,rn t€�ir�fi - `� � � t I� - ' � �_�� .` � �,�- �_ ! � ,� �t � � 3 �� ° �I . i' g � '� # ,. �, � �, �� . �r�.�,"�lrs��:.�- � i ��.. T �� k.. .. �, r '��, �,+��,� � hf �,i�.. �II . _ _ .} �'� � �' A _ .ti. , I��y 1.�.; i�� :. 1-� �I "e'= l 7 �.,� t .,��° r,� j-• _� 1� Y� p t� } � r'�'�' Y � - �� k �U j ��. S Y � ,. . • i � `' ... 1 " �'t � . � .�. - 1 � � �'M �. � � � �` �. �q 'r� t l � t+ �°�� , ,r I �, a i � 1 . <.��. s�..iy�t�a � A "�4 —, � � � 1 ',.. "S � � � � �, .. ...�. I ,��,.- �.L ^1 '- � �-° �.: i ��w � ` � � � �v'� i1r r � � ' k '� � r o :, ' �'" _ _ , _ � � . ; _� ; , � , � \�., �. �?. ` s � �� , ; . / � .... i . t l y ` . I � ,�'� � � ,. _ �.� \ ' ` sn r .� _ r� �- �y�.Vn �r ! ` '.� ^ �7 � � _ a �€zr�o� H �r�nr� . �\ i�� , 4�. -_ ;, , �`_ � � � 7� '�.�� i�, ' .+ .._� �� . _ . . i . ;,,.. ; �' --F' e...+' r `` - � _ . i -` . _. .�' � - .., I f . � . ��„ �"�� t , � x �;N . � � / �df i - �� y� �',,\� � � l` - � f,' . _ ,� �f _ ' _t A� + -,-� � -` .iP' �n __..!"'" � � � .'�J L -� .-- '.: �� ' 1 . : c t r -`''T' _ _-. - #,� � �� i i,_ � � . �.. ..!��..�- �' i\ �..�c,�r a. ..._.� �:_ � � I:`� .�. _ r ,y/. "'� I 1 � - il. - � � � �.V�_ I �. � a �, L c '/.: � -... l � � �� r� r �,_ � � . > �� '* _ � ,+�� n� - : _ - '3=i� % /" i ` . � . . � a _ � 3 _ . , � - �r� jr /i � �' i � � � .■ � �� j� � H��r � l . E . .II Si . - -I� � � . , ` " � � . ; J , � ,..� ... . .. � 1� � � .. .:.. - .. y ,� . � � �' � _ � ¢ ;. a �. "� - .'h �_ ��_ � �_.'� -_ � , -�� Gii - , s ' ` � . � � •9 - t ^L- r = - Y"' 0 ---�a-t`-�S. -"a� -`:m- I =`�"'� � �y �+'` - '�.,r . , � '` � _ . � - '� , i � . � � tc. �� . � - ' � � � - � r L. �y��. � r _ �cn �" ��J f 4 1�` �� - � � . f ti : t " � � - "'� h- ��'� �, � � a , � � �`.} � 1 `�,�. ,f �^. t � � � � � � . _ " z 9 � a � `' \ � j - � � � � � t r�r �i„1 - � �?�� ,d 1�vtie.�. c �`�� y�, `� � � �� a _ i _' , , ) �� ° �? r �� _` '�� _ � z , �. �' ` s '�� ! � �'�;�� '. ,� � , � . .. �� . i r,� � � .� � • .� y �, f - � �� . I � �u� i_' - � 0 �.a _- — ✓£4 �1, r�. � � ��Tu� .y � $ 1'.� sm P_ .— _ �y.... �= � �-, �� ' • .' ° � � � *� ` � � � � � � �'9 ' � m '� r�`-;II � y�� M ' , k �F,a-a-1s ' , 1``� yr q� r �r �/_ -�Y % �� tM'' a � z,._ � �zil,- ♦ ::,p : `�,� � �` ��..t � :n � —� q� -� � �- � � � �� - r � p p � �� II� � �i � {� �' � . I� . �^""�`' � � � r i� ti y '}' � ... ._ I � .,_ � �� r1 i Y tt5�.� s� �,�. �� i � ' � h��. �"p+ � � 7 ' .: r �` i _. i �� •. �. _ r�•�,t ..' i � =�. F '� � � y ti �,� � � f .'�� " „� � �� ` t z�� t « � � - 1 � � � e a � � � ; � „ � � ;� �` �y� ` �i � � u '�"'--�r _ �� t � � �.k-� t � �� L., - { - :1. � — J �� a _ � � �.�� > >a, , �m � ��. s , �.. � � n��j j � 'S �' �u � ��. _ �-€` 1 f ..a� _ -.:��_�.�� . -,- . � '� 3, ." ,� i _�: .� � � � _ +,s ,� � � � � � I �� _ ( � t r� _ ��i ' ;�� ` i;� � �` - j ` . - - '_ `�- -..: w- _'_: � `R �r., A � ` . 'i " . _�-2n ✓�; �..x � . �� . . ... .,. .. : �� . _ . «._ .. � �:��: '-•„r _ � �:.j`': Copy,r.ight:�0?Q13�NationalGeographic5ociefy r.cube�cl USGS Map Vikings Alternative Urban Areawide Review �? AUAR Area Boundary �ecember 2, 2015 '�0 4,000 8,000 � ��,� N Feet V:�I938\acFlveV93803389�G15\Projecis\USGS.mxd 5 Figure 5-3 Pre-Construction Conditions page 19 AUAR Area: Existing Condifions �Jik��.rgs Wternaiive Urban Preawide Retiew � �� F�?Kh�eaa��nocrv nv��cw,lne� Ce�o='rber_o,.- _ � 5tantec page 20 6. Project Description: a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). The Minnesota Vikings are proposing to develop new facilities for the team, including an athletic/recreational complex with a stadium and corporate facilities. The mixed-use, phased project will include new residential and commercial development, trails and open space. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. The 203.64-acre planned development site that is the subject of this AUAR is located in the City of Eagan at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of State Highway 149 and Interstate 494 between Lone Oak Parkway and Ames Crossing Road. An AUAR is being prepared for all 203 acres comprising the development site (AUAR area). The AUAR area is currently home to the vacant Northwest/Delta Airlines Headquarters building and the affiliated, and also vacant, Flight Simulator Building. The Minnesota Vikings desire to re-develop this site into a mix of retail, offices (medical office uses), hotel/conference facilities, multifamily residential units, an athletic/recreational complex with stadium and corporate facilities, together with trail, open space, water/wetland and other amenities. 1) Typical suburban development methods will be used and all wastes from construction will be reused or disposed of according to all applicable city, state, and federal regulations. 2) There will be no modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes. Any and all existing equipment will be removed from the site and disposed of according to all applicable city, state and federal regulations. 3) At this time, construction plans are to demolish all existing structures on the AUAR area. All construction wastes will be removed and disposed of off-site according to all applicable city, state and federal regulations. 4) At this time, redevelopment of the AUAR area is proposed to be accomplished in four phases over 15 years, depending on market conditions. Phase 1 is intended to commence in the spring of 2016. Phase I includes the Headquarters Building for the Minnesota Vikings professional football team and a football training complex that includes three or four natural grass football fields, a 5,000 to 10,000 seat football stadium with artificial turf, and an indoor football training facility connected to the Headquarters Building. Future phases will potentially add retail/residential, hotel, and conference center. page 21 c. Project magnitude: Total Project Acreage 203 acres The AUAR will evaluate three development scenarios with varying magnitudes. Table 6-1 shows these scenarios and the potential magnitude of each land use evaluated under each scenario. Scenario 1 represents allowable development under the City of Eagan's adopted Comprehensive Plan. Scenarios 2 and 3 represent land uses proposed by MVZ Ventures as a Comprehensive Plan amendment. This amendment was approved by the Eagan City Council and is under review by the Metropolitan Council. Scenario 2 represents the lower end of the potential intensity of uses and Scenario 3 represents a maximum intensity of uses built across four development phases. Table 6-1 Develo ment Scenarios- A roximate S uare Foota e Land Use Scenario 1: Scenario 2 Scenario 3: Adopted Proposed Comprehensive Proposed Comprehensive Comprehensive Plan Amendment Plan Amendment Plan Maximum Buildout total area total area total area maximum height maximum height maximum height Total SF 1,889,000 sf 2,780,000 sf 3,1 10,000 sf Multi-family residential 0 800 attached units 1,100 attached units units 980,000 sf 1,170,000 sf 4-6 stories 4-6 stories Corporate 0 330,000 sf (all three 330,000 sf (all three Headquarters facilities) facilities) Stadium Headquarters: 2-3 stories Headquarters: 2-3 stories Indoor Practice Facility Indoor Practice Facility: Indoor Practice Facility: 105-120 ft 105-120 ft Stadium: 35-55 ft Stadium: 35-55 ft Hotel 0 80,000 sf 100,000 sf 5-8 stories, 150 ft 5-8 stories, 150 ft Conference Center 0 190,000 sf 220,000 sf 5-8 stories, 150 ft 5-8 stories, 150 ft Retail 0 220,000 sf 220,000 sf 2-4 stories, 85 ft (residential 2-4 stories, 85 ft or office above ground (residential or office floor retail above round floor retail Office, Medical Office 1,889,000 sf 980,000 sf 1,280,000 sf (525,579 sf 3-15 stories, 225 ft 3-15 stories, 225 ft existing at 3 stories 0 page 22 d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The Vikings need to vacate their existing headquarters and training facilities as they are unable to meet current and future needs at their present location. In addition to the Vikings facilities proposed in Phase I(see Question 6E for a description of development phases), proposed Phase II uses support the Vikings facilities and the vitality of the Vikings campus. The project serves as a major redevelopment opportunity for the City of Eagan as the site has been vacant or underutilized for nearly a decade and is vastly underdeveloped. The addition of the Vikings facilities, new housing, and commercial development will increase housing options and availability and provide recreation opportunities and commercial services to the area. The City and the region will be positively impacted by the increased revenue and property taxes generated by redevelopment on the site, as well as enhancements to services, jobs, and recreational opportunities in the regional community. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen? Yes x No The Scoping EAW evaluates the full build-out of proposed development within the AUAR area. The site is planned to be developed continuously, with construction commencing in 2016 and ending in 2030. There are four general phases of construction. The first phase begins in 2016 with the Vikings headquarters office building, practice facility, and outdoor stadium. The second phase of construction begins in 2017 and includes medical office uses, general office, medical office, retail, and multifamily housing. The third phase begins in 2020 and includes general office, retail, multifamily residential, and medical office. The fourth and final phase of construction is estimated to begin in 2025 and will include additional multifamily housing and the addition of four office buildings at a rate of one building every two years. Figure 6-1 depicts the site layout at full buildout. Table 6-2 summarizes the proposed development and construction of the AUAR area. Figure 6-3 depicts proposed development phases and Table 6-3 describes land uses planned for each phase. 0 Figure 6-1 Site Plan Table 6-2 Development Phases Proposed Land Use Construction Schedule Vikings training facility 2016-2018 Phase 1 Head uarters buildin 2016-2018 Stadium 2016-2018 Medical offices 2017-2019 General offices 2018-2021 Phase 2 Hotel/Conference Center 2019-2021 General offices 2019-2021 R eta i I 2019-2021 Multifamil residential units 2019-2021 R eta i I 2020-2021 Phase 3 Multifamil residential units 2020-2025 Medical offices 2021-2023 Medical offices 2025-2028 Phase 4 General offices 20260-2029 Multifamil residential units 2025-2030 page 23 � page 24 Figure 6-2 Development Phases f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? Yes x No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Cover types: Table 7-1 depicts cover types currently on the AUAR area. Cover types after development will be estimated in the Draft AUAR according to the development scenarios. Table 7-1 Cover Wetlands Deep Wooded/forest Brush/Grassland Cropland Before After 9.76 15.20 30.34 95.65 0 Lawn/landscapin Impervious surface Stormwater Pond Other (describel TOTAL Before I After 6.51 45.94 8. Permits and approvals required List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial fil page 25 assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriafe environmenfal review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Table 8-1 lists all permits that are anticipated to be acquired for construction of the proposed scenarios. Changes to this list may occur during the AUAR process. Table 8-1 Anticipated Permit Requirements Unit of overnment Type of application Status Federal Clean Water Act Section 404 USACE Letter of No Wetland Jurisdiction, if applicable State Public Waters Work Permit Water Appropriation Permit for new MDNR municipal well, if needed Temporary Water Appropriation Permit for construction dewaterin NPDES MS4 Stormwater Permit SWPPP MPCA Construction Site Stormwater Permit Industrial Stormwater Permit Clean Water Act Section 401 certification MN De t. of Health Water extension ermit Re ional Sewer extension permit Metropolitan Council Sewer Permit to Connect Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Local Comprehensive Plan Updates and Amendments Rezonin Site Plan Review PD - Planned Development City of Eagan Preliminar Plat Developer A reements Final Plat Si n Permit Buildin Permit Excavation and Gradin Permit Certificate of occupancy 12 page 26 Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No. 19. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 19 This Scoping EAW does not include an analysis of effects. The AUAR will address cumulative potential effects. 9. Land use: a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. The AUAR area was historically home to Northwest Airlines (acquired by Delta), serving as the company's corporate offices from 1985 to 2009. Two vacant buildings and adjacent parking lots are currently located within the AUAR area. The majority of the AUAR area is an undeveloped mix of woods and open space. There are several areas of steep slopes on the site, leading to wetland areas (See Figure 6-1: Site Plan). Trails run through or adjacent to the site on Lone Oak Drive, Ames Crossing Road, TH 149 (Dodd Rd) and Lone Oak Road. Kensington Park in Mendota Heights is the closest park to the AUAR area and features two soccer fields. However, it is located across I-494, making it difficult to access. The nearest parks in Eagan are Bur Oaks Park and Thresher Fields which feature athletic fields, tennis courts, off-leash dog park and a playground. They are located approximately one mile south of the site. The AUAR area does not include prime or unique farmlands. ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. Eagan's 2010 Comprehensive Plan is framed around three key issue areas: sustainability, active living, and connectivity. The City wants development and redevelopment across the city to follow these principals. This includes strategies such as developing a more sustainable land use and transportation pattern, reducing impervious coverage and managing stormwater, creating compact and mixed-use neighborhoods, and connecting trails and public spaces. The City of Eagan's Comprehensive Plan designates the site as Major Office. This land use type is typically comprised of a mix of office buildings, research and development facilities, educational facilities and hotels. Unlike industrial land or business parks, warehousing is only permitted as an accessory use. The City considers many elements of the site, including land suitability and natural features, when determining the density and location of structures 13 page 27 within developments categorized as Major Office. Another requirement of new major office development is a clear plan for a street network that distributes traffic across the transportation system within and adjacent to the site. Scenario 1 is based on the adopted comprehensive plan. On October 6, 2015, MVZ Ventures, LLC presented to the City of Eagan's City Council to request a change of the future land use of the site from Special Area/Major Office to Special Area/Mixed Use. The Council unanimously passed a motion to direct staff to submit a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council suggesting the land use change. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment is currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and will return to the Eagan City Council for final approval following completion of the AUAR. Scenarios 2 and 3 are based on the land uses proposed in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, but with varying intensities. Water and resource management plans are included in the response to the topic most closely related to the plan document. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The parcels in the AUAR area fall within two different zoning districts: PD- Planned Development and A-Agricultural. All parcels except the northwestern most area are zoned PD. In the Planned Development zone, many different uses are allowed including residential, commercial, and institutional. While developers in the PD district have a lot of site design flexibility, it is intended that developments will protect and enhance natural features and amenities on the site. Increased density is allowed to accommodate open space and other public facilities. A full list of requirements for the district can be found in the City of Eagan's Zoning Code § 1 1.60.17. The northwestern-most parcel in the AUAR area is currently zoned A- Agricultural. The Agricultural District is dedicated to preserving agricultural lands and hold land for future development. The district stresses the importance of protecting nutrient rich soils, prime for agricultural use. The parcel in the A district does have prime agricultural soil. However, the location of the parcel next to I-494 and an NWI wetland on-site make it less desirable for farming. A full list of requirements for the district can be found in the City of Eagan's Zoning Code § 1 1.60.3. Due to its proximity to Shanahan Lake to the southeast of the AUAR area, a small portion of the southeastern most parcel is located in a shoreland overlay district. Within this area, development is limited. Restrictions include maximum impervious surface cover, building 14 page 28 height, and utility requirements. A full list of requirements for the overlay district can be found in the City of Eagan's Zoning Code § 1 1.65. Figure 9-1 depicts the City of Eagan area zoning and land use, as discussed above. 15 page 29 Figure 9-1 City of Eagan Zoning and Land Use Map `�'-� � � _ _ � �, y� �� p , ,,- I �r �. �.- * �-� -- - �• * . . �'SF�i '�.-- � _ � �.� ` : - ¢ �_ _ �� -'-. _ y._ BP , � ��„�- - � _.r �_ � `:�� I � �U-:� �- _ � � Y_ __ _ � •h."�j r# 1 _ _ _ _ I _ , , � Yl . ' . � r . I I it,� 'I.f�~- �/' ��^I� ## .'�� _ —��6-��.P-'^��KYJav �.� f �. I �j � � 1 ..,� ` I t� _ " ,� �� I -� {{ #-. _ -- ►�i�i'�� ''� � '�� `` _ �� '� ,� �.i%.sl l i: �#��x� ��.,�. � 1 � 'S'+F. ' . . BP . l; ' PQ � � , � Fd I �'I ��, _� 1 �$�� I I i �� _ � . � - - � �l_�� 44 ' � v --�� r : f,' t I �.. p� i i -. ,.I a , �'� � ��.,— ��` _ _ �a6• s` �''' I, r � � � i � �'�. �H�, ..." �� ,II� E.- i 'I �7 � ,yri �. p> Ra �3 C'",°� f„ r a,R l l 1 R 7 i � I f � 1 4 f� � 1 ♦ � 1 � �l ..—� I .. I . � � l � '� .. li_ � y xf I .- ��} I E � ' � '" R 1 1 �:r' _a— r! i Y' _ _, =F � ,�:'` � r; ��4 . 3i r ,, I 1_ �-�, _ I ., � � � — ,� � _ A � �.,-', � � r ..S �. �i.��. _.- _ N . . ..� _. _ _ � A �- � — I � � '� f�Q, -- I — `�. , _ ,�-y- 1 `� +� �I � h„ I � �k Y� R�' ' �� , � � I_ _ .� � � ' l� L+i.�� '' ~ 1' i �, ; i Ai,—I �� 4�t�. i4'�. � ' '�'Y'�'1'�r� ` ` � �� s� .X � � .i : � � � i - - �. , w Y 'e.� 1 � � �y , •+ r . - � i � I 11 .� �4 ,. _ �P[� L�.� � ..-� ,� .�a � o.:,,,m � �ae � ' - ..w. , [� _ �€ ' — ` � �. �fl � :- , � ' -�- ' �� '�`'�-._. �1 ' �,, F Po �' 4-i I 1•1 ,�:- a,: R i� R P =- �"� � Rw' '. � I _ I`� I I ! 7 � I .� PD.` : 1- ' . . } - PD._� � i J�� 5'^'�t _.�,�`� L��, �L._�� } , ' � i��,,v.�� l.�_� � , ,,,� .- _i i Bp .� d� I{=. ',� � � ��r{� � � .rt . I ��M1,. I ,�J, P".� �y I�. Pd . -- - " �, —f '�'°+�g �u�+`; p � �,�`. ; � `� u i�� ` � , �, y�. ��[, ,� � � _ ..- � _ - -� '' 1''� � � RFOu� 4-�5 M � "I� � �I L �`7'� �'' �� . . — I ' ..�,,, � 1_!� ' i r-r�y� _ 4 � �....�� ❑ � � eP _ �, ' _ � �� . �*` a _ � � ti' �.. � �: U I_ �_A p� �� i ._i.iy �J' .is --_ � � �� I - c � n.,.,,. . .... , . _� — � S � �.sw..es.�+�.n �i i: r.r. ,. .�� I3F I _�� , !'�i- � ` � � �F � �-4 �'7� . �p'K�Mfvfill � � +Is1�4W k ��, �) µ �� g� c b�[wnM n:a+ 6 «.: I�,R'} ��TJ� �s �4 . ' � ��'�'� . TY IMYFY�H ,� PrY�F� FRaM � �� -_ - ..J � � �� rxYs+� �1'JIqi�M10�M�AV�4� - 4��rS i � F�D '� ��.^i �� ,.„.�A..,n ,�a '., } PL i .,; Y�---��' �'� ' � � �xu+k�nP.,wza�..��.. � R=� ., -��} � - i � r� r+.»+i a.a,. i'" -_ i f �4' T � l � �� `__ � r �+ - + - -, .Pr �_ � . � .. k w�.� cs�.w ru.�� - � ' 4 �R 1 �_ 4*� r.._,: �� 1�.3 !'� F Y.a s.S:."` o �,. �', ar�.,,a..ra.n n��nr.... I �I� f+} � � =7. � 1 ' I s I 6.',' .1�� { y� � a.t 1 1+,'�s �� v 1 1 V ,�,�y":,. aw � � � w . t � 4 � .� r YI� IIr'� . j� �'� -d ' �r '�� "*i�' 7' t' , p I-1 �r° �-� ` u.. _•_ #�11� 4 �rtl:� - i 4 _ ,r7 .�� n.... �'Ill �r r ' � - . � �--I F - � � � 5 � �1 f _ _ .T �-S - ` - p� :.� { � .; • , . - .� �. } : � � . . . � :F ., � , �� .. . > y� -, u ,•—. �� • �'v+ . ��l� ! fl ki `.i� I —� �i -w�.�Lx.��ui� 3n� t-'P -, � I ' .' r�' .` # � ' ' � ' _ ; . ,.._ ..A. . _ �;. �' �!+-: � _- - � , � � �'� _ ��_�' rz � �, P� , q �..., , �., , � � P�aa :� j :� � � Pp � �� } �' i -= y, � # f �" � � rv.�c�k.,u� , � � P` i I-� 't �� F + I �[��i'+� s��#.i� i ■ �� a a. � , xLii�i l�.�4rr f,� � _ e .,f '.Ii ��l 7 - .... ... � .-.,,- ' .��. ' ' _ . � �T �! hl t+d � �' ' ��r-'J. � .j , 4. 'r7 .� C�ty of Ec�gc�n ��ni�� ,Mlap� �likir��s :�.Itern�tiv� Urban f�r�a��rrid� �e�y�ie�� 4lJ.AR Area Bciundan+ Qeee�rrber 2, 2C�1 � �',, [Y 2,�d]� �,060 �. SZ�I�t�� x-�, j� FE@L 'v :'�..1 � �=_o,.�c`ive�,. ; oyg�3�eF'�,Gis4P:,�jecTs'•i�itg�� ric�ing : �p. m�so � page 30 b. Discuss the project's compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The Draft AUAR will evaluate each development scenario's compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning and adopted plans. The review will focus on implications for environmental effects. c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. The Draft AUAR will identify mitigation strategies to address any potential incompatibilities discuss in Item 9b. 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. The surficial geology across the AUAR area has been mapped in the Minnesota Geological Survey's Geologic Atlas of Dakota County (1990) as being a till unit, composed of reddish-brown sandy loam, with cobbles and boulders common. Depth to bedrock ranges from 50 feet to 200 feet across the site. The upper bedrock units range from the Platteville Limestone and St. Peter Sandstone where the bedrock is generally more shallow on the western side of the site, to the Prairie du Chien Dolomite where bedrock is generally deeper on the eastern side of the site. While the most shallow bedrock unit is composed of limestone, it is mapped as being greater than 50 feet from the land surface, which reduces the likelihood of active karst conditions being present. Draft AUAR The Draft AUAR will discuss any limitations of geologic features for the project and the affects the project could have on geologic features. The Draft AUAR will identify mitigation strategies to address any effects to geologic features. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to 17 page 31 stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item l l.b.ii. The following soil types were identified within the AUAR area, using the Web Soil Survey online application: Figure 10-1 Soil Types � V� .�� ..�i��r ,�}.. � •�� , ��s �'y�� ' '.`�"'""° j '`- ..at3:�; .�,: x, r�.,�,•�'�i�Y �, � ',� _ ,�,,�-r -.,�• i -_ ' � , � ;�';,�� , �'a'�s+� �4^�. �11 "�� _, � - i �,— _ . _� -ti : �'' sa��: -�----- —•• _.. ..�,,.q�� . fi.,,.'` ` �,.�y u , . �n . f '�� .,� tr j .J ass�: zrar . sa-. ��•�jY >s�r '"� :+�. �. it:i'. � . �y r••,c� annr q �-�.+� �p Q _. � k -3a:�� ,�. �, . . �'.S �.. 3d1i ` �a6 i.1[r�Rl.1 yi `� � `�� `�A�� i4"ti: . . . . I � � w 1FYL i � _ � • ' . � � ',\ . � r�-. 1I ' � ..4 f- 5� t3)f. i.1lt � � )61:: � � c � ' I 7 - • � � . `. "t � �, r 1e 3eai; uri ; _ ` .�'r'� �;..o '^' , e . i: 1 1 1", a,yi r+ i � . u�'.A �� er � - .`: ..��y ��.�.� 1 ,.ar. "�` -- -. ��°i�"�� +�,inia ` �,� _ ; ��=w �� 3� 3 • F � � � :,. �°-�._,,�, ' .+��, � � �� - � � ^�� . `�� *�y s � � � �x �, .� k ,� �.' � f ' � + �� r . �+�+fll. ' S'�A. � f ' ��,,°A �"�.°� � < •!F �"� r� _ ' �'� ��'� k� � t _ . _ -�� `�.' . - . ,. �� u� � r+* y. tiiii �loiiWr>` .� Safl Types �:'Y A.7�'nnl �.r� llfhnn ' . C iC�E �'E��2:^i J�] .. `` St�nte j page 32 Table 10-1 Soil T es Map Unit Acres in Percent of S mbol Map Unit Name Area Area 150B S encer silt loam, 2 to 6 ercent slo es 8.27 4.Ob�o 279B Otterholt silt loam, 1 to 6 ercent slo es 29.27 14.3% 279C Otterholt silt loam, 6 to 15 percent 9.12 4.47�0 slo es 342B Kingsley sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent 17.81 8.75% slo es 342C Kingsley sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent 66.14 32.5�0 slopes 342E Kingsley sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent 14.16 6.95�0 slo es 342F Kingsley sandy loam, 25 to 40 percent 4.26 2.1 �o slo es 344 Quam silt loam 21.99 10.8% 454C Mahtomedi loamy sand, 8 to 15 2.80 1.4�0 ercent slo es 454E Mahtomedi loamy sand, 15 to 25 4.39 2.15�0 ercent slo es 895C Kingsley-Mahtomedi-Spencer complex, 9.07 4.45�0 8 to 15 percent slopes 1816 Kennebec variant silt loam 1.81 0.89�0 W Water 14.55 7.14% Totals for Area of Interest 203.64 100.0% Topography in the AUAR area is generally rolling to hilly, with no steep slopes (greater than 12�0) identified. Drainage is immediately to the south out of the AUAR area and then to the northwest to the Minnesota River. Soils are generally of moderate permeability, with no highly permeable soils identified. Draft AUAR As part of the Draft AUAR, more specific soils evaluation will be performed as needed, and measures to address soil limitations will be identified. 11. Water resources: a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermiHent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. 19 page 33 Currently, the surface waters of the site include eleven wetlands and one stormwater pond. There is one impaired water within one mile of the AUAR area, Sunfish Lake (approximately 0.9 miles northeast of the project). Sunfish Lake is impaired for nutrients and biological indicators. The delineated wetland boundaries for the AUAR area are provided on Figure 1 1-1 (Wetlands 8� Storm Sewer map). Wetlands F and J are MDNR Protected Basins 250W and 252W, respectively. The wetland basins within the AUAR area total 24.54 acres. A summary of the existing predominant wetland communities, Circular 39 types, and the vegetation of each wetland is provided in Table 1 1-l. Figure 11-1 Wetlands and Storm Sewer Map Waflands & Sform Sewer ;;,,��,.. > tN�,.�•.,E u.n,.�� areat;:�e P.e�.;z,=: r _... na Sepoiscrro*as � w �► Pw.i�m�n (]iitl`�. - =v�1;.� Skmm Scwr ��F�• imryosed5lom-Sewe� � i_ns� W1 -.�ro•.�cf Wcvno � [:'�u W! - Yr.v.�lv A We'I�ri�! L•;:: .-.rc.�:!�e Nlo�er Bae:n : c .. s....�. f�of.xe ��..� �_,- „ra A.,�eaM II ' � �. _ ��. � Stantec Table 11-1. Existing Wetland Community and Vegetative Summary Predominant Basin Circular Isolated ID Wetland 39 Type Y/N Vegetation Comments Community The north half of the basin is vegetated by emergent plants and the south half is shallow water covered with lesser duckweed (Lemna minor). The vegetation at the wetland boundary is dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and A Shallow Marsh 3 No beggartick (Bidens cernua). The adjacent upland vegetation is dominated by green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), hackberry (Celtis occidentalis), common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea), and brome rass Bromus inermis . 20 page 34 Wetland B is a small depression in the woods along the northwest boundary of the AUAR area. The majority of the basin is an unvegetated mud flat. The vegetation near the wetland edge is dominated by marsh pepper smartweed (Persicaria Seasonally hydropiper) and clearweed (Pilea pumila). The B 1 No adjacent upland vegetation is dominated by flooded basin American elm (Ulmus americana), hackberry, common buckthorn, Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia), common raspberry (Rubus idaeus), old field aster (Symphyotrichum pilosum) and Pennsylvania sedge (Carex ens Ivanica . The vegetation in the wetland (SC-W) is dominated Shallow by lesser duckweed, and reed canary grass. The C Marsh/Seasonally 3/1 Yes adjacent upland (SC-U) vegetation is dominated flooded basin by bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa), red oak (Quercus rubra), common buckthorn, and Virginia creeper. The vegetation in the wetland is dominated green Seasonally ash, chestnut (Castanea dentate), and common � Flooded Basin 1 Yes buckthorn, with very little understory herbaceous vegetation. Wetland E is a constructed stormwater pond that has taken on wetland characteristics, and was delineated as a wetland. The basin has a 30 inch inlet culvert on the west side and a berm with a 12 E Seasonally 1 No inch outlet culver to Wetland F. The basin is eight Flooded Basin feet higher than Wetland F. The vegetation in the wetland is dominated by reed canary grass. The adjacent upland vegetation is dominated by red fescue grass (Festuca rubra) and Kentucky blue rass Poa ratensis . The vegetation near the wetland edge is dominated by coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum), reed canary grass and cinnamon fern Shallow open (Osmunda cinnamonea). The adjacent upland F water 5 No vegetation is dominated by common apple (Malus communis), green ash, tartan honeysuckle (Lonicera tatarica), common buckthorn, red fescue grass, Kentucky bluegrass and Canada goldenrod Solida o canadensis . The vegetation near the wetland edge is dominated by coontail, reed canary grass and Shallow open cinnamon fern. The adjacent upland vegetation is G water 5 No dominated by common apple, green ash, tartan honeysuckle, common buckthorn, red fescue grass, Kentucky bluegrass and Canada goldenrod. The basin is a shallow open water basin with a H Deep Marsh 4 No fringe of scrub shrub. The vegetation near the wetland edge is dominated by green ash, choke cherr Prunus vir iniana , ra do wood Cornus 21 page 35 racemose) and reed canary grass. The adjacent upland vegetation is dominated by gray dogwood, common buckthorn, Kentucky bluegrass, brome rass, and Canada oldenrod. I Shallow marsh 3 No The basin is dominated by cattails and reed canary rass. The basin is shallow open water basin with an interior island of scrub shrub (PSSI C). The vegetation near the wetland edge is dominated by Deep marsh and reed canary grass and giant goldenrod (Solidago � Shrub carr 4/6 No gigantea). The adjacent upland (SJ-U) vegetation is dominated by amur maple, green ash, box elder, tartan honeysuckle, common buckthorn, reed canary grass, field horsetail (Equisetum arvense), and white snakeroot A eratina altissima . Fresh (wet) Wetland K is a partially wooded basin isolated K meadow and 2�� Yes depression near the center of the AUAR area. The Seasonally basin is dominated by reed canary grass, eastern flooded basin cottonwood and white willows. ii. Groundwater - aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. No aquifers, springs or seeps were identified on the property. 1. Depth to groundwater: Depth to groundwater within the AUAR area ranges from 100 feet to 140 feet in the wells observed within the AUAR area. Shallow water table aquifers may be present if perched on low permeability sediments. 2. MDH wellhead protection area: The AUAR area does not fall within an existing wellhead protection area. The nearest wellhead protection area is for the City of Eagan and is approximately one mile west of the AUAR area. 3. The following wells were identified on the property: All groundwater wells identified within the AUAR area are within the bedrock aquifers. The wells identified in County Well Index database are: Table 11-2 Countv Well Index Unique Well Name Number 205804 205805 256099 Norman Nagle Irving Clark Northwest Airlines Depth Static (feet) Water Level Aquifer ��,.,.+. 203 258 275 100 Platteville-St. Peter 136 Platteville-St. Peter � 29 St. Peter-Prairie du Chien Well Listed Type Status Domestic Active Domestic Active Sealed 22 page 36 b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. The existing sanitary sewers to serve the AUAR area were constructed in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Wastewater is conveyed from the AUAR area into a Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) interceptor and eventually to the MCES Seneca Wastewater Treatment Facility. Trunk sanitary sewer service to the AUAR area is shown on Figure 1 1-2 Trunk Sanitary Sewer map. The sewer design was based on earlier City of Eagan Comprehensive Sewer Plans, which estimated sanitary sewer flows from a land use designation of Special Area (SA). Figure 11-2 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Map �,�� . .,, �. , - � q - . .. - _ ��-+- ��' � I ._ �- • . 1 �.� ae �:- ' ��' �P .��L._.- ,�i: � �_1.�,��y}�� f� _ .� � � �► ^:1� ! ;;; �� trl��,�Y� - . - -.. .. � � . , ��1 � �� , - � . 1`" "' : �� ;� r _ .`� �� d� � ��" � �n . _ _ �,-.�:-;-� Trarak Sonttary 5�ewer . - r.e W��r, - aKe�ew ,�� _. i-;"��.� , ;:.; I 4: 1 Y rcr �� I , �,:, ! . Srwrr []ntr.e:l P.a�ncl�ry �� '.�r.'AI n3pLntlnly y�, � .t�;, u��: n ,. , . {,� SYanCeC 23 page 37 The estimated sewer flows from the development scenarios will be reviewed in greater detail in the Draft AUAR. The 2008 Eagan Comprehensive Sewer Plan is the most recent document that identifies estimated sewer flows and existing sanitary sewer facilities serving the AUAR area. The City of Eagan is also able to provide existing billed sewer flows from existing land uses in the area over the last couple years. The existing sewer flows will be reviewed to determine if the existing land uses are generating similar sewer flows to those estimated in the Comprehensive Sewer Plans. If appropriate, the planned sewer flows will be adjusted to reflect billed values. The planned sewer flows will then be compared to the estimated sewer flows from the proposed development in the AUAR area. From this comparison, the impacts to existing sewers (e.g., under-capacity sewers) will be documented. The extent and timing that improvements to the existing sewer facilities serving this area are warranted from a capacity standpoint will be dependent on if and when the proposed sewer flows exceed the capacity. The phasing of the improvements/mitigation plan will be closely reviewed with Eagan staff and documented in the AUAR. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. Stormwater runoff from the AUAR area is directed to Ponds FP-4 and FP-5 as designated in Eagan's 2007 Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). Large recent storm events have not resulted in any flooding concerns in this area. Water quality requirements will be dictated with each development as it moves forward. Eagan's 2007 Storm Water Management Plan and 2007 Water Quality and Wetland Management Plan are the most recent documents identifying stormwater features and requirements for the AUAR area. Additionally, stormwater will need to be managed in accordance with the City's NPDES MS4 Stormwater Permit and SWPPP, Construction Site Stormwater Permit, and (for industrial sites) Industrial Stormwater Permit. These plans and permits provide requirements for rate control, water quality treatment, and volume control. They address both temporary and permanent stormwater management. 24 page 38 Draft AUAR Stormwater modeling will be done to determine if additional volume requirements are warranted for Ponds FP-4 and FP-5 due to the proposed development. Water quality BMP requirements for each site AUAR area will be identified. The Draft AUAR will explore if it is more efficient to satisfy water quality requirements from multiple sites with one regional pond as opposed to multiple ponds. Potential BMP locations will be identified, and construction site stormwater management (e.g., erosion and sediment control) will also be addressed. iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. The existing water mains to serve the AUAR area were constructed in the late 1980s and early 1990s, similar to sanitary sewer. Water supply for the AUAR area is provided by the Eagan water treatment plant, which relies on municipal wells for its supply. The water system design was based on earlier Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plans, which estimated water demands for each land use as slightly higher than sewer flows. The 2008 Water Supply and Distribution Plan (WSDP) and water models are the most recent documents which identify the estimated water demands and pressures for this area and all of Eagan. The WSDP assumes additional water supply and storage will be provided as the overall water usage increases. Draft AUAR To determine if adjustments to estimated water usages are required, usage from existing properties in the AUAR area will be reviewed in greater detail for comparison to estimated water usage from the earlier WSDP. If appropriate, the planned water usage will be adjusted to reflect existing usage. Estimated water demands for the AUAR area will then be compared to the planned water demands for the AUAR area. As part of this effort, water usage for irrigation at the existing Viking Facility in Eden Prairie will be reviewed to develop the proposed water irrigation for the AUAR area. The Draft AUAR will analyze the impact of the increased demand on the ultimate maximum day demand for the City which may result in changing the ultimate appropriation permit for the City of Eagan. Water models will be developed based on the estimated water demands for 25 page 39 the AUAR area including irrigation for sports fields. The results of the modeling will provide pressures and identify if the need for water facilities is different from those in the most recent WSDP. Static pressures in the AUAR area will be identified noting any area of concerns. iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. Draft AUAR Wetlands within the AUAR area are regulated by the following rules and agencies: • Clean Water Act Section 404 - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (potential for Clean Water Act 401 certification from Minnesota Pollution Control Agency); • Wetland Conservation Act - City of Eagan; and • Public Waters Work Permit - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (Basins F and J). The City of Eagan also has a Wetland Protection and Management Ordinance that provides additional protection measures for wetlands such as buffers, setbacks, higher replacement ratios, and guidance for sequencing. A summary of the protection requirements for each wetland and regulatory agency is summarized in Table 1 1-3. Table 11-3 Summary of Wetland Protection and Regvlatory Agencies Permanent Management wetland buffer Sequencing - Wetland DNR Classification minimum width Eagan Replacement Regulating ID Protected? Eagan (feet) Ratio - Eagan Agencies Ordinance Eagan Ordinance Ordinance Ordinance No impact Class W 1- without USACE A No Protect 50 demonstration 3:1 WCA of significant Eagan/LGU ublic benefit 40 or to edge of WCA Class W3 - 100 yr HWL, sequencing USACE WCA B No Priority A whichever is requirements 2'1 Eagan/LGU reater a I Class W3 - 40 or to edge of WCA USACE WCA C No Priority A 100 yr HWL, sequencing 2'1 Eagan/LGU 26 page 40 whichever is requirements reater a I 40 or to edge of WCA Class W3 - 100 yr HWL, sequencing USACE WCA D No Priority A whichever is requirements 2'1 Eagan/LGU reater a I 40 or to edge of WCA Class W3 - 100 yr HWL, sequencing USACE WCA E No Priority A whichever is requirements 2�1 Eagan/LGU reater a I 40 or to edge of WCA USACE MNDNR Class W3 - 100 yr HWL, sequencing F Yes - 250W Priority A whichever is requirements 2:1 WCA reater a I Eagan/LGU 40 or to edge of WCA Class W3 - 100 yr HWL, sequencing USACE WCA G No Priority A whichever is requirements 2'1 Eagan/LGU reater a I No impact Class W1 - without USACE WCA H No Protect 50 demonstration 3:1 Eagan/LGU of significant ublic benefit 40 or to edge of WCA Class W3 - 100 yr HWL, sequencing USACE WCA I No Priority A whichever is requirements 2'1 Eagan/LGU reater a I No impact Class W 1- without USACE J Yes - 252W Protect 50 demonstration 3:1 MNDNR WCA of significant Eagan/LGU ublic benefit 40 or to edge of WCA Class W3 - 100 yr HWL, sequencing USACE WCA K No Priority A whichever is requirements 2'1 Eagan/LGU reater a I As part of the Draft AUAR, an analysis will be conducted to explore how the wetland features of the site can be protected while accommodating the proposed land uses. The City of Eagan Water Quality and Wetland Management Plan as well as the Wetland Protection and Management Ordinance and other regulatory programs will be used to help guide the wetland protection and mitigation planning for the site. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate 27 page 41 environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. A system for managing and protecting the surface waters and wetlands within the AUAR area was planned and implemented in accordance with Eagan's 2007 Stormwater Management Plan and 2007 Water Quality and Wetland Management Plan. Draft AUAR As part of the Draft AUAR, potential impacts of the proposed development will be quantified. Measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts will be identified. Potential BMP locations will be identified. BMPs will be proposed that are consistent with the requirements of the City, Eagan-Inver Grove Heights Watershed Management Organization, and NPDES Permits. 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes: a. Pre-project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. Draft AUAR The following databases will be reviewed to evaluate on-site or nearby potential sources of contamination or environmental hazards: the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) "What's in My Neighborhood", the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) "County Spill Records" and the MPCA Petroleum Remediation Program (PRP) online maps. Data within S00 feet of the project limits will be reviewed and identified MPCA/MDA site locations will be field verified. In addition, previous findings for Phase I or II Environmental Site Assessments conducted within the AUAR area will be reviewed to identify potential contamination or environmental hazards. Potential hazards from site demolition and construction activities will be identified. Mitigation strategies consistent with state and federal laws will be developed for the Draft AUAR. b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. : page 42 Draft AUAR The Draft AUAR will identify any project related generation and storage of solid wastes as well as requirements for storing and disposing of the materials in accordance with state and federal laws. c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Draft AUAR The Draft AUAR will identify any project related use and storage of hazardous materials as well as requirements for using and storing materials in accordance with state and federal laws. d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. Draft AUAR The Draft AUAR will identify any project related generation and storage of hazardous wastes as well as requirements for generating and storing materials in accordance with state and federal laws. 13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. The percent of land cover type present within the AUAR area was determined using Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) data (MDNR. 2015. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System. http://dnr.state.mn.us/mlccs/index.html. Website accessed November 24, 2015.) and GIS tools (Figure 13-1). The AUAR area is approximately 203 acres in size (Figure 13-1; MDNR 2015). Dry grasslands and highly developed lands are the predominant land cover within the project area, comprising approximately 83.24 acres (40.9�0) and 26.66 acres (13.1�0), respectively (Table 13-1; Figure 13-1). 29 page 43 ure 13-1. Current Land Cover '"� , i �..�d � � ! �{ "-" * � ' �� . yr ,� •, s . - ,- .' � � _ - �� ' - "t_- - - - -� • -- - -- �„ „�_T • ` - - !' -� _, ��■ �r�r1��+.ni��a�n.�sr�� i f� , i I _ � - �+' ' �� . . � .y { �u _ 4 � yP 1.�. _ � � I �''`" _ �,ti•� � E y��--'� � 1, Ef' d ; �,•� . � � . F § '°� _ � A�, - ��,, � " - . ■ -•� ..�y� �. - - �T �� : l ��1 . � �i � � • P s • ' � i * I ' M'4 _ • E �4 I i }d �* � � � � ,* k ��. � - r � ' ; � :�. .� , r i ---�---� � � ' � . -- � ' �* , ' x¢'� ' . . � ' �N� �' � � h � ,`� � { '� "l�.''�� ..� I � �+1�. `��, � �,� Y`" `+y4!� ,� ti � ��"" � +i � - .� ♦_ ' - ,q . � #�� r. � a .. � .r� � ��,ry � - e ' s�9� "�r� -. zy M � �r .y ,s � �{ ,� .�1'� + r��* v� �. �� I �-. '� •S� . ' �- � e � . � �`�..� r, �' . �-�+.�'�" .� _ 'fi, �' - � ,. >: �; 'r i � .� �� . � . .�_ � , _ „ . �, t s.�"' �-. s � -- �� ti � � , ,. � _ _ � �` � ' - `q3 r� r` , ` ' � . �.�"�'� " �y ' AY � �� Y' � . � �.c , s � � � _ �t 4� * � . . � ��'� � O�F' - - � _ : .rvy�-fy3� � _ a r . _ .�, ,� . *' . - . � = f �'7 . 4.'^ C�i . �ti I�. �UfT�FYf ��]11[� �CtYE°C '�l°ikin�s r",It�rnat�v�e LJrt�an Lan�d Caver iYP�� I� �:ra:ssor�ra'r�r c��-�i�x Afe�L^did� ReYie'v'� �evelor.�d I��d �1 � °b imperm�❑Gle � ,- � I hialr�t�i.-�e� �-��ss�.s � DEVBIDC•�d LC7rid 1�-SC`�Yo�. Ift"ipvaPffY2�'JkIF� � UpIOfYd �.�.=.GI�UQJS `OPeSf 0 SQC� �.{}[]D Fe�t '`� � Develaoed L��d Sd-9G46 imP�rrc�ec��le ppen V4�t�� W�"I�ne�s �� DQveloce� La��d :>9C� in-��rermeabl� �� y:e-lar�a�� .�,«,�t��s.a.i� �� Dry G��al�n�s --- ."'.'G9+v'fJ Q'p K'.� rC'-:CJ:O �Y:R .. . =•�u••=.�.-- e.9fi CG'.G Y.ILC:��:i. Ccke.fe. C,�unF.� ��'Y. ci =�nrn . . G ._-�.e��143� -_�€',(_'.prnjecF`. d��u�-er.rr..� 30 page 44 Table 13-1. Land cover type and amount within the AUAR area determined throu h anal sis of MLCCS data MDNR 2015 . Land Cover Type Total Acres Percent of Total Develo ed land <1 1�o im ermeable 3.19 1.6% Developed land 1 1-50�o impermeable 15.50 7.b�o Develo ed land 51-90� im ermeable 0.59 0.3� Develo ed land >90� im ermeable 26.66 13.1 � Maintained Grasses 6.51 3.2�0 Dr Grasslands 83.24 40.9� Grassland Tree Complex 12.44 6.1 � U land Deciduous Forest 30.34 14.9% Open Water Wetlands 15.20 7.5�0 Wetlands 9.76 4.8� TOfial a 203.43 a Total reflects actual value and does not account for rounding error within the table. MLCCS data for the AUAR area was developed by the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. The system categorizes open and developed areas in terms of land cover, rather than land use (MDNR 2015). Within the AUAR area, land cover was categorized and boundaries developed based upon a desktop assessment of aerial photos dating 1994, 1997 and 2000. In addition, land covers of select areas in the site were determined based upon 1999-2000 field visits. The Draft AUAR will identify changes to land cover at the project site since these determinations were made. The MLCCS methodology separates land cover types into three categories: natural, semi-natural, and cultural. Natural land cover types are more likely to contain potential suitable habitat for rare wildlife and plant species than previously disturbed areas that may contain artificial surfaces and/or invasive species (i.e., semi-natural and cultural). Refer to Table 13-2 below. Table 13-2. Natural land cover type and amount within the AUAR area determined through analysis of MLCCS data (MDNR 2015). Land Cover Type Total Acres Percent of Total Oak Forest 7.28 3.6% Palustrine Open Water 15.20 7.5�0 Mixed Emer ent Marsh 3.37 1.7� TOtal a 25.85 12.7% a Total reflects actual value and does not account for rounding error within the table. In addition, based upon a wetland delineation conducted in mid-September 2015, the project site contains 1 1 wetlands and one existing stormwater pond. The wetland basins total 24.54 acres. 31 page 45 Draft AUAR Using the land cover information provided by MLCCS data, historic and recent aerial photography, site photographs, and the results of a wetland delineation and tree inventory survey, the Draft AUAR will assess whether potential suitable habitat for fish, wildlife, threatened and endangered species, rare features and ecosystems are present at the site and whether these species may be impacted by the proposed project. b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA- 760) and/or correspondence number (ERDB ) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. Per a review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS's) Endangered Species website, there are three federally listed species with a geographic range including Dakota County: Higgins eye pearlymussel (Lampsilis higginsii) - Endangered Northern long-eared bat (NLEB; Myotis septentrionalis) - Threatened Prairie bush clover (Lespedeza leptostachya) - Threatened Based upon a review of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) under license agreement LA-760, there are no known records of state-listed species within the AUAR area. However, the review indicated known records of two species within the project vicinity: Lily-leaved twayblade orchid (Liparis lilifolia) - there are multiple records of this species, observed in July 1999, to the east and southeast of the project area. This species was formerly tracked and listed as a species of Special Concern in Minnesota; however, this species is not currently state-listed and is not protected by state regulations. Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludoviciana) - this species is state-listed as Endangered. One known record of this species, observed in June 1994, is located within a pasture area approximately one mile southeast of the site. The record was of an active nest with reproduction. No records for this species have been made in the area since 1994. There are no records for this species within the AUAR area and the vegetation character in the AUAR and surrounding area have changed significantly since the 1990's with a notable increase in tree canopy and brush (replacing vegetation types that were more open, with scattered shrubs). In addition, an analysis of Minnesota Biological Survey (MBS) data, there are no mapped high quality plant communities or MDNR-mapped Sites of Biodiversity Significance within the AUAR area or the immediate vicinity. A desktop review of the MDNR's Regionally Significant Ecological Areas map (2003) indicates that 32 page 46 portions of the AUAR area were mapped as falling into the top category (Category 3 or outstanding) for ecological biodiversity. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. Draft AUAR In order to evaluate the impacts of the proposed development on fish, wildlife, plant communities, threatened and endangered species, rare features and ecosystems, the Draft AUAR will map the development scenarios and overlay the MLCCS data on the proposed site plan to determine the potential acreage of pre- and post-construction impervious surface and land cover types. In addition, the Draft AUAR will determine the acreage of natural communities or special ecosystems, based on state or local designations, to be disturbed as a result of the proposed development. Using this analysis, state and federal records of protected species in or near the project area, and evaluating the site for suitable habitat based on a comprehensive desktop assessment (i.e., aerial photographs, wetland delineation report, tree species inventory, and publicly available information), the Draft AUAR will evaluate the project's potential to impact fish, wildlife, plant communities, threatened and endangered species, rare features and ecosystems. The Draft AUAR will research habitat requirements for the NLEB, the species range within Minnesota, and evaluate the AUAR area for potential suitable habitat based upon a comprehensive desktop assessment. The Draft AUAR will assess potential impacts on this species after determining how much, if any, potential suitable habitat will be removed or disturbed by development within the AUAR area. Construction activities that involve soil disturbance can result in the introduction and spread of invasive species. The Draft AUAR will identify any permit requirements related to noxious weeds and invasive species management and will provide a discussion of industry best management practices during construction and operation within the AUAR. d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. Draft AUAR Upon comparison of the pre- and post-construction land cover assessment within the AUAR area and evaluation of proposed impacts to and/or the preservation of water resource features and natural communities, the Draft AUAR will identify the scope of potential development impacts and measures that avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. 33 page 47 14. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. Draft AUAR A formal consultation with the SHPO will be initiated to determine if the SHPO database has any records of known features and if the features are listed or eligible to be listed on a local or National Register or if the site needs to be surveyed. AUAR area 15. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The AUAR area is not located near any scenic views or vistas. Draft AUAR Initial site plans indicate that stadium and practice facilities for the MN Vikings will be located in the northern portion of the AUAR area, near to the highway. The Draft AUAR will include an analysis of lighting impacts on adjacent roadways and nearby sensitive uses. Mitigation strategies for any light impacts will be identified in the Draft AUAR. 16. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project's effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. Due to the nature of the project, it is not anticipated that stationary source emissions will be applicable to the AUAR. b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project's traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project's vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. 34 page 48 Draft AUAR Air quality analysis of vehicle emission impacts varies considerably in content and level of detail based on the project scope, size, geographic location, and background conditions. The Draft AUAR for the AUAR area will primarily address localized emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and Mobile Source Air Toxics (MSATs) and will be performed to assure that violations of the NAAQS will not occur because of the proposed project. The analysis will be performed in accordance with a Minnesota DOT Air Quality Guidance memorandum dated September 2009. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item l ba). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. Draft AUAR Dust and odors may be of concern during all phases of construction. The Draft AUAR will document City Ordinances and Codes pertaining to dust and odors and mitigation strategies for the AUAR area will be developed. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. Draft AUAR Vehicular traffic noise associated with increased traffic volumes within the AUAR area will be the primary continuous noise impact from this development. In the Draft AUAR, the traffic impacts both from construction and long term operation of the AUAR area will be evaluated in accordance with the Minnesota DOT Noise Policy for Type I Federal-aid Projects, effective June 15, 2015. The addition of a stadium may also increase noise levels at the AUAR area during events (crowds, loud speakers, etc.). Currently, the closest residential developments to the site are across I-494. Given this source of continuous ambient noise along with impacts from the MSP airport, it is assumed that additional noise from stadium events will not adversely impact properties surrounding the AUAR area. The City of Eagan has an existing ordinance regulating noise levels within a 1-mile buffer of MSP Noise Exposure Zone 4. The AUAR area falls within this buffer. The mitigation plan within the Draft AUAR will address strategies necessary to mitigate adverse impacts of airport noise on any land uses deemed incompatible with this noise threshold. 35 page 49 18. Transportation a. Describe traffic-relafed aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated fofal average daily fraffic generafed, 3) estimated maximum peak hovr tra�c generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of fransit and/or other alternative transportafion modes. 1) Existing and proposed additional parking spaces: The amount of additional parking spaces on the AUAR area is yet to be determined. The number of additional parking spaces provided by the development will be determined as part of the Traffic Impact Study (TIS) which is included in the AUAR documentation. 2) Estimated total average daily traffic generated: The development is expected to generate well over 2,500 trips per day, the threshold to trigger the need for a TIS. The specific amount of daily traffic generated will be determined for each of the development scenarios in the TIS based on the methodology described below and documented as part of the AUAR. 3) Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence: The development is expected to generate well over 250 trips in the peak hour, the threshold to trigger the need for a TIS. The peak hour is expected to be the weekday PM peak hour (likely around 5:00-6:OOpm). The amount of peak hour traffic generated will be determined in the TIS based on the development scenarios. 4) Indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates: Trip generation for the AUAR area will be determined by a combination of the MXD+ Method and trip generation rates for similar developments. The MXD+ Method utilizes average trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Trip Generation Manual as well as the trip generation processes described in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 684 and the United State Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) report on "Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments". The MXD+ Method is preferred over the ITE Trip Generation Manual method for mixed use sites due to the ITE Trip Generation Manual's tendency to underestimate internal trip capture between sites within a development area. The MXD+ Method will be applied to trip generation for Scenarios 2 and 3 as well as interim phasing of the full buildout of the development. For the Minnesota Vikings training center specifically, trip generation rates will be applied using information from similar developments since the ITE Trip Generation Manual and the MXD+ Method contain incomplete information for trip generation for such developments. Trip distribution will be estimated using Dakota County's Travel Demand Model, 36 page 50 which is based on the Metropolitan Council's Regional Travel Demand Model to determine changes in traffic patterns due to the addition of the proposed development. 5) Availability of transit and/or alternative transportation modes: Transit The following transit resources will be reviewed to establish existing and planned transit conditions around the AUAR area: • Metropolitan Council's 2040 Transportation Policy Plan o Planned transit routes o Planned park and ride locations • Dakota County 2030 Transportation Plan • METRO Transit park and ride locations • Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA) fixed-route service • Dakota Area Resources and Transportation for Services (DARTS) demand responsive service • Shared ride services Based on the review of the existing and proposed transit access to the AUAR area, the need for additional transit service will be identified. The AUAR documentation will be based on coordination with the appropriate agencies, specifically MVTA, regarding any changes to existing or planned services to support the development. Bicycling The AUAR will include a review of existing and proposed bicycle facilities in the study area and on the study site. The existing inventory includes: • Existing bicycle / transit interfaces • Existing shared use paths and on-street bike lanes Information about proposed facilities will be obtained from: • 2030 Eagan Comprehensive Plan • Mendota/Lebanon Hills Greenway Plan • Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan Based on the review of the existing and proposed bicycle facilities within the AUAR area and a review of the site plan, the need for additional bicycle facilities will be identified. Walking A field review will be performed to establish existing sidewalk availability on the study site. The Dakota County 2030 Transportation Plan will be reviewed to identify anticipated pedestrian demand and any planned sidewalks in the AUAR area. Based on the review of the existing and proposed sidewalks within the AUAR area and a review of the site plan, the need for additional sidewalks will be identified. 37 page 51 b. Discuss the effect on traffic congesfion on affecfed roads, and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis musf discuss the project's impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generafed exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily frips exceed 2,500, a traffic impacf sfudy musf be prepared as a part of fhe EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 or a similar local guidance. The effect of the proposed development on affected roads will be studied in detail in the TIS prepared as part of the Draft AUAR, which is required since the development is expected to generate more than 2,500 trips per day. Existing traffic information will be obtained from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Dakota County, the City of Eagan, and other agencies as applicable. A site visit will also be conducted to confirm supplied information and obtain any missing site information. Traffic turning movement counts will be supplied by MnDOT for intersections along state highways, and turning movement volumes will be counted for the remaining intersections in early December 2015. Traffic analysis will be performed at the following existing intersections for the analysis in the existing conditions and no build conditions in the TIS: • Trunk Highway (TH) 55 & TH 149 (Dodd Road) (North Intersection) • TH 55/149 & County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 26 (Lone Oak Road) • TH 55 & TH 149 (Dodd Road)/Holiday Lane • TH 55 & CSAH 63 (Argenta Trail) / CSAH 28 (Yankee Doodle Road) • TH 149 (Dodd Road) & Mendota Heights Road • TH 149 (Dodd Road) & I-494 North Ramp Intersection • TH 149 (Dodd Road) & I-494 South Ramp Intersection • TH 149 (Dodd Road) & Blue Gentian Road/Northwest Parkway • TH 149 (Dodd Road) & Lone Oak Parkway • CSAH 63 (Argenta Trail) 8� O'Neill Drive • CSAH 63 (Argenta Trail) & CSAH 26 (70'h Street W) • CSAH 26 (Lone Oak Road) & Lone Oak Drive • CSAH 26 (Lone Oak Road) 8� Ames Crossing Road • Northwest Parkway & Lone Oak Parkway • Lone Oak Parkway & Lone Oak Drive • Lone Oak Parkway & O' Neill Drive Additional intersections created as a part of the development will be analyzed in the build conditions. Traffic analysis will be completed using Synchro, SimTraffic, and HCS 2010 software for the studied intersections. Synchro will be used to analyze operations at all intersections and identify intersections/approaches/movements that are over-capacity or have queue lengths exceeding available storage. SimTraffic software will be used to analyze intersection operations for motor vehicles for over-capacity or queuing issue conditions. HCS 2010 software will be used to : page 52 analyze motor vehicle operations for any roundabouts proposed as mitigation measures. The three development scenarios will be analyzed as part of the TIS, in addition to 2015 existing conditions. Scenarios 2 and 3 are anticipated to be built out by 2030, but an analysis year of 2035 has been selected to plan for any additional transportation infrastructure needs. The following traffic volume conditions will be analyzed as a part of the TIS: • Existing Conditions (2015) • Scenario 1 No Build Conditions (2035) • Scenario 2 Build Conditions (2035) • Scenario 3 Build Conditions (2035) Background traffic growth for the No Build conditions (Scenario 1) will be determined using information from Dakota County's Travel Demand Model, which incorporates anticipated land uses as described in the City of Eagan's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. These No Build conditions represent what the site might look like if the proposed development did not occur and another development consistent with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan took its place. Trip generation will be determined using the process described previously in this document for each phase of the development. Trip distribution will be determined using the Dakota County Travel Demand Model. If necessary, interim build conditions may also be evaluated for Scenarios 2 or 3. These interim conditions would represent the phased development of the site between 2016 and 2030. In the event that transportation infrastructure mitigation is required for Scenario 2 or 3, these interim conditions would indicate the year these improvements would be required. If interim year analyses are conducted, a No Build scenario (consistent with the Comprehensive Plan) would also be analyzed in the same year. Future year conditions will include programmed improvements in MnDOT's State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), Dakota County's Capital Improvement Program, the City of Eagan's Capital Improvement Program, and the City of Inver Grove Height's Capital Improvement Program. Projects currently identified in these programs within the AUAR area include: • Commers Drive south of TH 55: Resurfacing (2016) and Seal Coat (2018) • Lone Oak Road at Lone Oak Drive: Addition of signal (year not identified) • Lone Oak Road at Ames Crossing Road: Addition of signal (year not identified) • Conversion of CSAH 26 (Lone Oak Road/70'" Street W) from a 2-lane to a 4-lane facility east of TH 55/149. Existing safety information will also be analyzed using information from MnDOT's Crash Management Analysis Tool (CMAT) for the studied intersections. Safety effects of mitigation measures will also be discussed as part of the TIS. Pedestrian and bicycle system analysis will also be provided on a qualitative level for 39 page 53 existing intersections and intersections within the proposed development. c. Identify measures fhaf will be faken to minimize or mitigate project-relafed transportafion effecfs. The TIS will include mitigation measures for anticipated transportation impacts due to the development. Intersection approaches/movements that result in a vehicle level of service of LOS E or F will be considered for mitigation, with the exception of those that already operate at LOS E or F under existing conditions. In these cases, mitigation will be considered to return intersections to their current LOS. These mitigation measures will be identified based on the Scenario 3 conditions, the maximum anticipated land use, and then scaled back as needed for Scenarios 2 and 1. 19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. Draft AUAR The Draft AUAR will identify reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed projects based on development applications and infrastructure projects in surrounding communities. Based on the analysis, geography and timeframes, the nature of the cumulative potential effects will be summarized and necessary mitigation will be identified. 40 page 54 RGU CERTf FICATION. (The Environmenta! Quality Board wi!! onfy accept SIGNFD Environmenfa! Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor, j I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this doc�ment is accurate and complete to the best of my lcnowledge. � The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages ar components ot�er than those described in this document, which are related to the proJect as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rufes, parfs 441 Q.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectiv�ly. • Copies of this EAW are bein� sent to the entire EQB distribution list. _ . -. fl 5ignature Titie Citv Planner v Date December 23. 2015 For an AUAR document, no certifications as listed at the end of the EAW form are necessary. (The RGU is legally responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the document and for properly distributing it nonetheless.} C�1 � T � m DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND page 55 11C1 Vict�ria Curve , Menobta he �nts, �iN 5�i18 651.452.1&50 phone I 651.452.8940 fax � www.mendota-heights.com _ CITY OF MENf7�TA HEf�HT� January 4, 2016 Mayor, City Council and City Administrator Nolan Wall, AICP — Planner Mike Aschenbrener — Chief of Police Rental Housing Licensing/Residential Property Usage Title 3, Chapter 5 of the City Code contains rental housing regulations. The Code requires a license for all single-family dwelling units in the R-1 District being rented. The permits have been issued on a yearly basis since 2006; a$75 fee was added in 2010. The City contains several developments that are zoned MR-PUD, HR-PUD, MU-PUD, R-lA, R-2, and R-3 that may contain single-family and townhome units being rented. Regardless of the zoning district or housing-type, the intent of the rental licensing regulations applies to both, as in 3-5-1 of the Code: It is the purpose of this chapter to assure that rental housing in the city's R-1 one family residential zoning district is decent, safe and sanitary and is operated and maintained in accordance with the city's regulations. The implementation of a rental licensingprogram in the R-1 zoning district is a mechanism to ensure that rental single family housing will not become a nuisance to the neighborhood,• will not foster blight and deterioration; and/or will not create a disincentive to reinvestinent in the community. Staff intends to present a case study around the impacts of a changing housing market and quality of life issues associated with those changes for discussion by the City Council, including the following: • Impact of multi-use in residential neighborhoods • Rental housing in Mendota Heights • Vision for community residential life discussion • Potential solutions/tools UDGETIMPACT Rental licenses are currently collected by the Engineering/Public Works/Fire Department Secretary and issued by the City after review by the planning, administration, and police departments. Any changes to the licensing programs will have staffing impacts. RECOMMENDATION If the City Council desires to revise the rental housing license program, staff can be directed to begin an amendment process for iniiial City Council discussion or to consider a more broad-based analysis on neighborhood impacts of multi-use residential property. page 56 �c� �,� :, :��,�, ��e�,�� i i � �r� �� 651.452185�� E�hone � �S1A52,8940 lax, ` www.mendota heights.com _ _ � � CITY OF M�N��TA H�I�HT� DATE: January 4, 2016 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: Engineering Department Study COMMENT: INTRODUCTION The Council is asked to consider authorizing an study of the City's Engineering function and funding methodology by Craig L. Ebeling. BACKGROUND In November, the City Council discussed the then-recently-created vacancy in the Engineering Department, and whether that should be filled "as is" through filling with another Project Engineer; or filling the vacancy with a consulting employee, possibly in GIS. The direction was that staff should bring the subject back to the Council, and include a matrix of current job responsibilities within the Department. Staff has reviewed this issue since that time. Before filling the position, I believe a deeper look should be done now as to how the Department currently operates, what responsibilities it has, and how it might be structured to make the engineering function in Mendota Heights sustainable in the long run. Funding for the department now relies heavily on projects, and the work for those projects are done primarily in house. This financing model is unusual for a developed suburb. It may be better in the long term to transition to a model which is less reliant on fees, and one that also ensures that the engineering and maintenance tasks are being accommodated which are necessary for a suburb such as Mendota Heights. It would be beneficial to have someone knowledgeable about both engineering, and overall city operations to come in and look at our operation, and advise us as to how to best page 57 move forward with financing, function and the engineering staff—be they city employees and/or consultants. I believe that former Burnsville City Manager, and former consulting engineer Craig Ebeling would serve well in that capacity. He has provided a proposal (attached) which is very reasonably priced, which would allow for a very timely "big picture" look at engineering, and how the tasks of the vacant position should be accommodated. BUDGET IMPACT The proposed fee for performing this study is $2465. Payment for this can come from the 2016 Contingency line item in the Administration budget. RECOMMENDATION I recommend that the Council authorize that a study of the City's Engineering Department be done by Craig L. Ebeling. ACTION REQUIRED If the Council concurs it should take action at the January 5t" City Council meeting to approve the agreement with Craig L. Ebeling to perform an Engineering Function study for Mendota Heights. Mark McNeill City Administrator page 58 December 23, 2015 Craig L. Ebefing General iocal Government Consulting 2805 Crater Co�rt Burnsville, MN 55337 Email — crai 495� mail.com Web— http:�fcrai�4958.wix.comfcrai��ebelin� Telephone — 952-35G-68i2 Fax — 952-894-3338 Mark McNeill - City Administrator City of Mendota Neights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota �ieights, MN 55118 Re: Reuiew of City Engineering Function dear Mr. McNeill: Thank you very much for considering us as a reso�rce in your angoirog discussions regarding the best way to facilitaie the completion of necessary city infrastructure engineering tasks. It i� aur understanding that thFs discussian is prflmpted by the need to fiif a vacancy in the department. The vacancy present� an opportunity to reflect �n the nature af v�cant position and how it maghi b� filled with the presen� arrangement or a modified arrangem�nt. In order to ass�st in that discussion we propose to c4mp�ete the following data colfection arrd analysis tas�cs: 1. Re�iew of the Engineerir�� Departrneni Revenues and Expenditures budgets Z. Re�riew of City Organizational Chart especially relating to the Engineering Department and �ts interre�ations with other departrnents �. Review of �ngineering bepartrnent Job i]escriptions 4. Review of charges made �y the Engineering Departmer�t ta other funds an� / or inter-fund transfers for s�rvices rendered by the Engineering Department 5. Review of ciata from the Minrtesota Department af Transportation regarding usage of consulting engine�rs as designated City Engin��rs for purposes of the Mu�icipal Sta#e Aid Street system funding G. Interview Discussion with Engineering Department Personnei 7. Interview Discussian vuith Finance Department Personnel 8. Int�rview Discussi�n with Administration department Personne! 9. Interr��ews with Mayor and Co�ncil M�mbers After data caliectian and analysis preparation of the following: 1. A discussion on present operatior�al madel a. worfc sco�e covered by existing siaff b. revenue generated � page 59 c. departmenta! impaet on the G�neral Fund d. Other pertinent findings Identificati�n of potential options for changes addressing the foilowing: a. Is th� present st�ff-mix the most optimai in meeting the city's needs? b. Will there be changes in the �City's needs in this area gaing forward? c. 5hould the existing department be enlarged ar reduced to bQtter in�et the City's needs? d. Shauid the existing �ep�rtment be supplemenied wit� consultants? e, Should the present system of "charging out'" the casts relating to the engineering departmer�t be a+�ended? A written report detaiiing t�e findings ofi the work and a discussion se�sion with the Mayor and City Council reviewing t�e frndings. If the City deterrri9nes that our help wauld be beneficial we propose compensatian �t �ur standard rat� of $85.0� per hpur with a total cast ta the �ity not to �xceed $2,465.d4 as per th� attachet� detailed task sheet. T�ank you �ery much for ca�sidering �as as you er�ter inta these discussio�s. We would very muth lik� to be inuol�ed, S�ncerely, � � � � �\ �, � Craig L`Eb"eling Attachment: Task Listing —� City of IVlendota Weights - Review of Ciiy Engineering Function Accepted this day ofi , 2016 Mayor � City Administrator Task Listing - City of IVlendota Heights - Review o# City Engineering Fur�ction page 60 Task Re�iew of Engineering �ept. Expenses and #teVenue Budgets Review of Organizationa� Structure Review af Engineering Deparfrnent Job Ciestriptions Review of [�epartrnent Charges / Inter-fund Transfers Review af MN DOT MSAS Data re Usage of Consuitants In#er�ievu with Engineering Department Personnel Interview with Finance []epartment Personne� Inter+�iew with Adminisrration Department Personnel Interview Urith Council Persannel Recitation of Findings re �xisting 5tructure Identifieaiion of Potential Optians Repo�t Text Preparatian Preser�tation of Findings a� Counci! Work Shap % Meeting I�ours Rate 1.5 $ 1.0 $ 1.5 $ 2.4 $ 2.0 $ 2.0 $ 1.5 $ 1.5 $ 4.0 $ 2.0 $ 5.0 $ 3.0 $ 2.Q $ ��_oa $5.00 85.�0 85.(}fl 85.00 85 AO 85.00 85.�d 85.00 85.00 85.00 s�.oa 85.00 Amaur�t 127.5Q s�.oa 127.50 17Q.0�0 x70.0� 17Q.OQ 127.5� 127.50 340.00 ��o.aa 42�.00 2�s.ao 17D.f}fl TOTA� $ 2,465.QQ page 61 Qualifications and Proposal for the Organiza tional Stud y of the Mendota Heights Police Department For Mendota Heights, Minnesota ell . � �� „ Submitted by McGrath COI�SUL�l'ING GROUP, ING. December, 2015 � �� McGrath c:t:>:�sl i.�i��vcF c;�zc��;l� ►,�c. December 15, 2015 Mr. Mark McNeill, City Administrator City of Mendota Heights ll O1 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN S S ll 8 Dear Mr. McNeill: page 62 McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. is pleased to submit a Statement of Qualifications and Proposal to conduct an Organizational Study of the Mendota Heights Police Department for the City of Mendota Heights, MN. McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. utilizes consultants that are highly skilled individuals with both educational credentials and work experiences in the areas outlined in this proposal. Our consultants have extensive experience and proven success in conducting police organization and management studies. As Senior Police Consultant, I will be the main point of contact and will coordinate this project. In the proposal I have detailed information on the consultants to be involved, as well as the scope of our work. Additional information can be obtained about our firm from our web site at www.mcgrathconsultin _.� com. However, the best source to determine the quality of our product is by contacting our references. We understand the importance of this project and look forward to the opportunity of working with you and your staff. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact our office at 815-728-9111or me directly at 630-746-2651. Sincerely, �J�,o�n �� Ron Moser, Senior Police Consultant McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. P.O. Box 190 Wonder Lake, IL 60097 ron(a�mc�rathconsultin .� com (815) 728-91 ll corporate office (630) 746-2651 mobile phone McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 2 page 63 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 4 DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY ................................................................................................... 5 SCOPE AND STUDY APPROACH .............................................................................................. 6 EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES ............................................................................................ 7 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE ............................................................................................. 10 Chief Ronald Moser — Project Manager / Senior Police Consultant .................................... 10 Dr. Michael H. Hazlett — Data Analysis ............................................................................... 12 Dr. Victoria McGrath — Human Resources ........................................................................... 12 Sheriff Patrick Perez — Law Enforcement Consultant .......................................................... 14 Chief Mark Beckwith — Law Enforcement Consultant ......................................................... 15 PROJECTTIMELINE .................................................................................................................. 16 COSTPROPOSAL ....................................................................................................................... 16 McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 3 page 64 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The firm of McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. submits this proposal to conduct a Police Department Organizational Study for the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota. Our firm utilizes a team concept to conduct this study. The team members are described in the section of the proposal entitled, "Key Personnel Experience". Our proposal includes a description of our firm, the scope and approach to the study, a list of professional references to contact, the professional biographies of the consultants for this study, a project timeline (subject to modification based on your needs), and study costs. McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. specializes in public sector consulting, predominately in the fields of public safety (police, fire, EMS) and human resource management. The principals of the company have over 50 years of public sector experience. McGrath Consulting employs approximately 27 staff inembers (principals, consultants, and clerical) that may be used on any study depending on the area of expertise required. Thus, the members of the consulting team are experienced police, human resource, and public safety professionals with proven records of positive results. They will provide excellent information that will allow you to move forward. McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. has conducted a number of police studies addressing opportunities to assure long term effectiveness and viability of high quality services for our clients. Our firm prides itself on its innovative recommendations that maximize police service in the most cost effective manner. McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. will deliver a draft report to your designated staff inembers. The intent of the draft report is to allow review of the document to assure that all areas outlined in the proposal have been addressed, the report is clear and concise, the consultants have not misinterpreted any data, and there are no obvious errors. The consultants will communicate with the parties on any issues that are identified in the draft review. Upon review of the draft report, the consultants will provide a pdf copy of the final McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 4 page 65 report for reproduction. In the event the client requires hard bound copies, the firm will provide copies upon request for an additional cost matching our printing expense (receipt will be provided). Our company will develop recommendations tailored to your needs. We are confident McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. can provide an independent professional organizational study to the City of Mendota Heights. DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY The firm of McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. is incorporated in the State of IDinois. The address of the corporate headquarters is P.O. Box 190, Wonder Lake, IL 60097. The office phone number is 815-728-9111. The e-mail addresses of the principals of the corporation, as well as our Senior Police Consultant, are listed below: Dr. Tim McGrath Dr. Victoria McGrath Ronald Moser, Senior Police Consultant mc grathph d(a� aol . c om victoriaphd cr,comcast.net ron(c�mc�rathconsultin .g com McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. was incorporated in May of 2000. The firm has been in business for over 15 years. Dr Tim McGrath is the CEO of the corporation. Our subsidiary company, McGrath Human Resources, was formed in September of 2012. Dr. Victoria McGrath is the CEO of our subsidiary company. The primary contact for this project is Senior Police Consultant, Ron Moser. His contact information is listed below: Ron Moser, Senior Police Consultant McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. P.O. Box 190 Wonder Lake, IL 60097 McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 5 page 66 ron(a��rathconsultin .c�om (815) 728-9111 corporate o�ce (630) 746-2651 mobile phone SCOPE AND STUDY APPROACH Our Senior Police consultant, Ronald Moser, will serve as the Project Manager. He will be the main point of contact with you and your staf£ We approach this study as a team. In addition to our Project Manager, other team members, including Sheriff Pat Perez and Chief Mark Beckwith will participate in the onsite processes. Dr. Michael Hazlett will provide expertise in the analysis of data and information derived from documents and other reviews. His work will be completed offsite. Dr. Hazlett is a highly respected consultant related to data- driven analysis of staffing, deployment, and workloads. Dr. Victoria McGrath will serve to address all human resource matters. Her work will also be completed offsite. We clearly understand that this study is to focus on the practices of leadership, management, supervision, personnel, policies and procedures, and staffing. Additionally, we will assess the current culture and climate of the department and make recommendations. Our final report will address the current organization and operations of the department in relation to industry best practices and provide recommendations far improvement where appropriate. Furthermore, the report will provide information on the current state of employee issues related to internal culture and social issues. Our firm will complete this project within 90 days of contract approval. In the first month (January), our team will request documents be provided from the City of Mendota Heights for offsite review. We will begin analysis of documents and information provided. In month two (February), the consulting team will be onsite in Mendota Heights for four days. Day one will be arrival with an evening meeting with appropriate designated city staff to make introductions and obtain information. Days two and three will be full work days for team McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 6 page 67 members who will conduct interviews, make observations, meet with staff inembers to clarify information received from documents and talk to identified stakeholders. Assuming availability of staff, consultants intend to interview all police department personnel, both sworn and civilian. Team members will depart on day four. The draft report will now be developed. In month three (March), our Project Manager, and other selected team consultants, will meet with you and selected staff to review the draft report. Any concerns regarding the draft report will be clarified and addressed through follow-up actions. Following this process the final report will be prepared and presented to the City. The manner in which the report is presented is to be determined by City officials. EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES The following references are listed as management study projects that are similar in scope as required by the City of Mendota Heights. Additional prior clients can be viewed on our webpage www.mcgrathconsultin_.� com under the tab "About" —"Clients" which now includes clients in 27 states. University Circle, Inc. 10831 Magnolia Drive Cleveland, OH 44106 Contact: Laura Kleinman, Vice President Services —(216) 707-5040 Email: lkleinman(a�universitycircle.org Project: A comprehensive initial auditing of the University Circle Police Department was conducted in summer and early fall of 2014. Following that audit, a recruiting process for Chief of Police was conducted which included an Assessment Center for the final candidates. Four iinal candidates were chosen for the Assessment Center. The Assessment Center was conducted in May, 2015. The Assessment Center project included design of exercises involving consultation with University Circle executives. In addition to the consulting firm assessors, observers from the University Circle community were involved. The exercises utilized included an in-basket exercise, a group management discussion, a public speaking exercise, and a group McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 7 page 68 interview. As a result of the Assessment Center process, a candidate was selected and has been hired as Police Chief for University Circle. City of O'Fallon, IL 255 South Lincoln O'Fallon,IL 62269 Contact: Pam Funk, Assistant City Administrator —(618) 624 — 4500 Ext. 8731 Email: pfunk(a�,ofallon.or� Project: Audit of the police department was conducted in the late winter of 2014, including assessment of the police managed EMS functions. Recommendations were made for improvements throughout the police operations and administration. Village of Golf, IL 1 Briar Road Golf, IL 60029 Contact: Trustee Jim Dominik —(847) 998-8857 Email: j.dominik(a�villageof olf.us Project: Audit of department including a management assessment. Focus was on policy, training, supervision and management. Information was provided on department improvements to the Village Board, as well as a newly appointed Police Chief. The following clients are listed as references for which our firm conducted promotional assessment centers and/or executive recruitment services. Riley County, Kansas Police Department 1001 Seth Child Road Manhattan, KS 66502 Contact: Brad Schoen, Director —(785) 537-2112 Email: bschoen(c�r�_ c�ypolice.org Project: In December, 2013, Assessment Centers for the position of Police Sergeant and Lieutenant were conducted. The Assessment Centers project included design of exercises McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 8 page 69 involving consultation with Riley County Police staf£ The exercises utilized included an in- basket exercise, a counseling session, policy development, and a tactical situation. As a result, successful candidates were selected and promoted to position of Sergeant as well as Lieutenant. Syracuse University 119 Euclid Avenue Syracuse, NY 13244 Contact: Anthony Callisto, Sr. VP & Chief Law Enforcement Officer —(315) 443-5480 Email: acallist(a�svr.edu Project: Recruitment and Assessment Center for Chief of Public Safety for Syracuse University. The Assessment Center was conducted in April, 2015. The Assessmeni Center project included design of exercises involving consultation with the Interim Director of Public Safety and the Senior Vice President and Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the University. In addition to the consulting firm assessors, observers from the University staff were involved. The exercises utilized included a group management discussion, a structured interview, policy development, meeting with a working colleague, and a community meeting. As a result of the Assessment Center process, a candidate was selected and has been hired as Chief of Public Safety for Syracuse University. Our firm is currently providing services (police related) for the following public client: City of Stafford, Texas 2610 S. Main Stafford, TX 77477 Contact: Richard Ramirez, Chief of Police —(281) 261-3952 Email: rramirez(a�staffordtx.gov Project: Police Department operation's audit to determine if current policies, procedures and practices of the department conform to industry best practices. McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 9 page 70 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE Our Senior Police Consultant, Ron Moser, will serve as the project manager for this Organizational Study. The biographies of the other consultants are listed below. These consultants are chosen for this project based on their subject matter expertise related to this study. Chief Ronald Moser — Project Manager/ Senior Police Consultant Chief Ronald Moser heads the police division of McGrath Consulting Group, Inc. and will serve as the Project Manager. Prior to joining McGrath Consulting, Chief Moser spent 34 years in law enforcement at six municipal agencies, in three states, in vastly different and diverse communities ranging in population from 9,000 to 700,000. At three of those communities he served as Chief of Police. When serving as Chief of Police for 11 years in the Village of Hanover Park, IL, a Chicago suburb, he held the collateral position of Director of Emergency Management. The Village Board subsequently appointed Chief Moser to the position of Village Manager where he served for three years before retiring. Shortly after retiring he was recruited to serve as Interim Chief of Police for the Village of Sugar Grove in Kane County, Illinois. There, he implemented much needed change, and helped the organization become more efficient and realized significant cost savings through scheduling and other changes. Chief Moser was responsible for developing the first strategic plan for a police department, facilitated the accreditation through the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) of the Hanover Park Police Department, and has served as a CALEA team accreditation member and Team Leader. Thus, he has a wealth of experience in the evaluation of best practices within the police and law enforcement arena. He has been most successful in developing strategies in reducing crime. Chief Moser has been instrumental in developing partnerships with Homeland Security, loca] and regional law enforcement agencies, including cross jurisdictional responses of Village emergency responders — police, %re, and public works — to local, regional, and state disasters. McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 10 page 71 Through his innovative efforts, the Village saw a 50% reduction in Part One crime. The Village of Hanover Park was recently rated as one of the 100 safest cities in America. As Village Manager he instituted change both internally in Village Departments as well as externally in the community. Internally, Mr. Moser greatly reduced employee payroll expenses by instituting an early retirement incentive, converting full-time positions to part-time thereby increasing work hours but reducing costs, and restructuring the employee pay plan to more closely reflect the current conditions of the economy. To achieve greater efficiency and customer satisfaction he restructured the Community Development Department and improved the building inspection process. A much needed new police building was constructed which was completed under budget and within the proposed timeline. Externally, much attention was directed toward Village development as well as image. A long standing TIF District was closed successfully under his purview. The Village purchased a shopping center and took measures to increase occupancy and improve the appeal of the center which sits on a major thoroughfare. Major improvements in communication to the public were put in place, including increased electronic methods, visual signage, and public interaction, resulting in an improvement in the public perception of the Village. In addition to serving his community, Chief Moser is a member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police (Life member), Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police (Life member), DuPage County (IL) Chiefs of Police Association (past President and Life member), North Suburban (IL) Association of Chiefs of Police (Life member), the American Society for Industrial Security, and a former member of the International City Managers Association and Illinois City Managers Association. He has served as an adjunct faculty member at a number of colleges and universities and currently instructs criminal justice courses through Columbia College of Missouri. Chief Moser has a Master of Arts degree in Criminal Justice and Corrections from the University of Iowa, as well as a Master of Arts and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Western IDinois University. McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 11 page 72 Dr. Michael H. Hazlett - Data Analysis Michael H. Hazlett, PhD, is a Professor Emeritus from the School of Law Enforcement and Justice Administration (LEJA) at Western Illinois University in Macomb. Before receiving his doctorate at Sam Houston State University (1984), Dr. Hazlett served as an evaluator, planning and research specialist for the Texas Governor's Office - Criminal Justice Division from 1975 thru 1981. After graduation, he joined the faculty at the University of Alabama at Huntsville. Dr. Hazlett then joined the faculty at Western Illinois University in 1986 and retired from teaching in 2012. Dr. Hazlett's research interests and publications have included numerous published works on criminal justice administration and organizational issues, crime analysis and forecasting, research and statistical analysis for criminal justice agencies, traffic and stop patterns in law enforcement, stress and use-of-force encounters using simulators, public perceptions of the police, and research regarding criminal justice personnel resource management and staffing, law enforcement prosecutions under the Federal Civil Rights Act (Sections 241 and 242). Dr. Hazlett continues to provide consulting services and research expertise to a variety of criminal justice agencies and private corporate clients. Dr. Victoria McGrath - Human Resources Dr. Victoria McGrath has an extensive background in the iield of human resources, predominately in the public sector; but also has a number of years in the private sector having worked in health care, banking, and education. In 2012, due to the ability to serve organizations in human resources beyond public safety, McGrath Human Resources Group was formed and Dr. McGrath serves as CEO of this subsidiary organization of McGrath Consulting Crroup, Inc. She brings over 29 years of experience in all phases of human resources. Her professional eXperience includes the City of Brookfield, WI, which had in excess of 500 employees, including 5 labor unions; the Elmbrook School District, WI — the 2"d largest school district in Wisconsin, also with 5 labor unions; and Citicorp Banks. Thus, she has dealt with McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 12 page 73 labor/employee relations; policy, procedure and labor compliance; benefits and compensation; recruitment and staff development. As a labor negotiator, Dr. McGrath has represented management while utilizing a consensus style bargaining for a variety of public sector unions. During contract negotiations with the Fire Union, the entire contract was re-written in order to accommodate the first paramedic training center located outside an educational institution. Through her education and experience in both working and consulting in human resources, she has developed an extensive background in analysis and development of compensation systems, overtime analysis and FLSA compliance, labor contract analysis, and development of integrated human resource systems — recruitment, compensation, policies & procedures, and performance management. In addition to the evaluation of all aspects of a department/organization's personnel systems, she has also worked with department supervisory personnel to ensure efficiency in job responsibilities either within a single department, or across departments within an organization. When called upon, she has then integrated these recommended position changes within the arganization's compensation system. In addition to her role as CEO of McGrath Human Resources Group, Dr. McGrath is an adjunct professor at Northwestern University teaching in the Masters of Public Policy. A member of the Society for Human Resource Management, Wisconsin City/County Management Association, International Public Management Association for Human Resources; and World at Work. Dr. McGrath has a Ph.D. in Administrative Leadership from the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, a Masters of Management from Cardinal Stritch College, and a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Relations/Finance from the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee and has completed Labor Management Relations Training from the Federal Labor Relations Administration. McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 13 page 74 Sheriff Patrick Perez - Law Enforcement Consultant Sheriff Patrick Perez began his career with the Kane County, Illinois, Sheriff's Office and rose through the ranks of Sergeant, Supervisor of Special Operations, Investigations, and Patrol as well as spending some time in the civil division responsible for foreclosure sales in Kane County. In 2006, and again in 2010 he was elected Sheriff. Sheriff Perez brings a wide variety of experience in law enforcement from street policing to administration of a County Sheriff's department of over 300 employees representing 30 divisions including: (partial list) Adult Justice Center Patrol Division Investigation Division Crime Analysis Unit Civil Division Community Policing Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Bomb Unit Court Security Division K-9 Unit Sheriff Perez enacted several initiatives to professionalize the agency including: mandatory random drug testing, an office of professional standards, major revision of the department's Standard Operating Procedures, established a crime analyst position , redesigned the website, established a public information officer, and implemented a Citizen's Police Academy. During his tenure as Sheriff, the operations were relocated, thus increasing jail capacity from 400 to 640 inmates. Thus, he has experience in design and building of a new corrections facility. In 2008, the operations were move to the new St. Charles facility; which entailed the relocation of 511 inmates in one night. The increase in population did not correlate to an increase in staffing, as many alternative staffing methodologies were considered and implemented. Current correction officer staffing is 122 personnel, 35 assigned to court security, and 85 deputies. As Sheriff, he has overall responsibility for a budget approximately $27 million. Sheriff Perez is a graduate of the National Sheriff's Institute. McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 14 page 75 Chief Mark Beckwith - Law Enforcement Consultant Mark Beckwith is the Deputy Chief of Public Safety for Augustana College in Illinois. Prior to joining the campus police for Augustana, he served a distinguished 28-year career with the Milan, Illinois Police Department. At that department, he rose through the ranks to become Chief of Police. He has the collateral duty at Augustana as the Emergency Management Director, and is currently authoring the campus University Operations Plan. Under his leadership, Augustana College was selected as one of nine colleges to participate in the State of Illinois "Ready to Respond Campus" pilot program. Deputy Chief Beckwith, for six years, served as the President of the Illinois Law Enforcement Alarm System, which provided leadership to the entire state of Illinois Law Enforcement Mutual Aid System. This included oversight and a management of Homeland Security funding for Illinois agencies, as well as administering the coordination of out of state mutual aid response to Hurricane Katrina, the 2008 Republican National Convention, the 2009 G20 Summit in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and the 2012 NATO Summit in Chicago. Deputy Chief Becicwith has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Law Enforcement and Justice Administration from Western Illinois University, and is a graduate of the FBI National Academy. McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 15 page 76 PROjECT TIMELINE The following is a general timeline, which can be adjusted to fit the needs of the City of Mendota Heights. We are flexible and will schedule our work to meet your needs. Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 (Januar ) (Februar ) (March) Notice to proceed and Submittal and Review contract approval. Consulting team onsite of Draft Report. Final for interviews, Request for data and report subsequently initial off-site review observations, meetings. presented to City Draft report developed. of documents. officials COST PROPOSAL Operational Study Fee : ..............................................................$23,400 (All services described for the study as stated) Organizational Study fee includes consultant(s) time and preparation and submission of the study document, as well as all travel and lodging and other expenses. The cost of the study will be divided into three payments. The first payment of $5,000 will be invoiced upon completion of a signed contract; $13,000 will be invoiced upon submission of the draft report; and $5,400 will be invoiced upon submission of the final report. All invoices are payable within 30 days of receipt. The quoted price is good for 90 days from December 15, 2015. McGrath Consulting Group, �nc. Page 16 page 77 I'v� `d'�� f -a l,l:f" ��.'.- N�� " ts, h�� lt�. fv'I'v ;��..lr 651.452]8��? phoi7e � 651.452.8940 rax _ wwwmendota heighks.com _ � � m{ CITY C3F MEND�TA �IEIGI�ITS DATE: January 4, 2015 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Sloan Wallgren, Recreation Program Coordinator SUBJECT: Declaring the City of Mendota Heights a Pollinator-Friendly City Back�round The Parks and Recreation Commission is consis�ently looking for ways to improve the Mendota Heights community and parks. Recent research has shown that the pollinator population is declining nationwide due to the loss of basic habitat, the simplification of landscapes, and the increased use of neonicotinoid systemic insecticides. It is important to participate in pollinator- friendly practices, because pollinators are a necessary component to a healthy ecosystem. At the October 13, 20] 5 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, the commission passed a motion for the council to consider, which would declare Mendota Heights to be a Pollinator-Friendly City. It further outlined ways to help the desired result to become a reality. The following is a list of the actions steps the commission recommends for implemetation in order for the City of Mendota Heights to become a Pollinator-Friendly City: 1. The City would make sure that future plantings on city property are pollinator-fi-iendly. 2. The City will include an article in the April 2016 issue of the Heights Highlights to educate the residents as to why it is important to be pollinator-friendly and how to become pollinator-friendly. 3. The City will provide links on the city's website to pollinator-friendly websites, which will include best practices and a list of pollinator-friendly plants. 4. Individual members of the Commission would work to establish a plant sharing program. 5. The City will continue to work with Green River Greening to plant pollinator-friendly plants when the opportunity presents itself. 6. The City would continue to not use neonicotinoid systemic insecticides. Staff has attached a sample of the resolution and an example of the information that would be available on the City's website. page 78 Bud�et Impact There will be no impact to the budget. Recommendations Thew Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution, declaring the City's intent to become a Pollinator —Friendly community. page 79 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2016-01 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS TO BE A POLLINATOR-FRIENDLY COMMUNITY WHEREAS, bees and other pollinators are a necessary component of a healthy ecosystem and food system, providing pollination of plants in order to grow vegetables, herbs and fruits; and WHEREAS, pollinator populations are in sharp decline due to an ongoing loss of habitat as a result of human land practices, which is coupled with a simultaneous large-scale expansion of insecticide use by homeowners, landscapers, property managers and farmers; and WHEREAS, neonicotinoid and other systemic insecticides have been shown to cause illness and death to bees and pollinators; and WHEREAS, alternative land management practices are available that dramatically increase pollinator forage while decreasing maintenance costs; and WHEREAS, the monetary and social cost of maintaining pollinator-friendly landscapes can be ]ess expensive the than costs associated with maintaining chemically- treated monocrop landscapes; and WHEREAS, many Mendota Heights residents and businesses are pledging to manage their land in a pollinator-friendly way; and WHEREAS, acting in a pollinatar friendly manner is not expected to inhibit any potential treatments for Emerald Ash Borer infestation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, that the City of Mendota Heights is hereby declared a Pollinatar- Friendly Community, and that the City celebrates current policies and practices that protect and support pollinator health by minimizing the use of insecticides. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights urges all Mendota Heights property owners, residents, businesses, institutions and neighborhoods to become more pollinator-friendly by adopting practices including: -Committing to avoiding the use of insecticides, including systemic insecticides, on their property; -Avoiding the planting of flowering plants which are treated with systemic insecticides; -Planting more pollinator-supporting forage on their property, and adopting organic or chemical-free lawn and landscaping practices. page 80 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Sth day of January, 2016. Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST: Lorri Smith, City Clerk page 2 of 2 The Great Lalces region includes an incredibly diverse range of plant communities from wild blueberry barrens and northern boreal forest in Ontario and northern Minnesota, to tallgrass prairie in Wisconsin and Ohio, and mixed broadleaf forests in Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and New York. Corresponding to this strilcing diversity of plant communities is an equally remarlcable range of pollinators including the endangered Karner blue butterfly (Lycaerdes melissa samuelis), more than 20 species of bumble bees (Bombtcs spp.), and the northernmost population of migrating monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). As a group, these and other pollinators maintain healthy, productive plant communities, provide food that sustains wildlife, and play an essential role in crop production. Providing wildflower-rich habitat is the most significant action you can talce to support pollinators. Adult bees, butterflies, and other pollinators reguire nectar as their primary food source. Female bees also collect pollen as food for their offspring. Native plants, which are adapted to local soils and climates, are usually the best sources of nectar and pollen for native pollinators. Incorporating native wildflowers, shrubs, and trees into any landscape promotes local biological diversity and provides shelter and food for a diversity of wildlife. Additional advantages of native plants are that they often require less water than non-natives, do not require fertilizers, and are less likely to become weedy. Purple giant hyssop, purple prairie clover, and butterfly milkweed. This guide features regional native plants that are highly attractive to pollinators and are well-suited for sma11-scale plantings in gardens, on business and school campuses, in urban greenspaces, and in farm field borders. In addition to supporting native bees and honey bees, many of these plants attract nectar-seeking butterflies, moths, and hummingbirds, and some are host plants for butterfly and moth caterpillars. With few exceptions, these species occur broadly across the region and can be purchased as seed or transplants. Please consult regional Floras, the Biota of North America's North American Plant Atlas (htt�://bona�.net/na�a), or the USDA's PLANTS database (htt�://�lants.usda.�ov) for details on species's distributions in your area. Our Bring Back the Pollinators � y� 4'��, campaign is based on four ;�g�,g t� $��=_ principles: grow pollinator- �� 'l�n� � friendly flowers, protect bee nests �y�j��'�j�,.��,�;'� and butterfly host plants, avoid � c""v"�" pesticides, and spread the word. s„a��•c„�sK.��;a� +Y°"" You can participate by takuig the Pollinator Protection Pledge and registering your habitat on our nationwide map of pollinator corridors. www.bringbackthep ollinators.org THE XERCES SOCIETY FOR INVERTEBRATE CONSERVATION Protecting the life that sustains us a' a � fi N �, � . . � .. � O � � � � v ' � � '� ;.� � ''p � � � v v bC � � N . O v � � u � . � A i�+ � �.. °1 � u O � „ C . aj �0 .� .� .o O .Ci ��. .S �p '. .� ��. Q .p. ' u . C �" " .bq � ,ti w .� y� o u ,, � � a � ... . .o �, a . a� a :� v '7 �u � a�`i G � o o � a „ :� � N � �, � a �° � ; � ° . m '� � o� v .�. .� � w c, .. v o . � y v � v .� tiy � :� ;.� ': "�, u � � a, 3 .d � n � v� ;, � �v � a' � d � � ,� � � p' � � �"u a '-�w- � v �U �.. N w �.. � .� "�d w �. .� � � v - v . v .n u � � � � ,a u ' � a � .d � ,� � °. a � AC«^� b b .�'Jp , h � . Av � � "' aF'i � > � u t° w m � � � d p " �°, �, Q �' � a .' � � ��, � >. � � �. ��' w �� °�' ° � � a�. . � w ° � � y O p � ,p . a �a � � 'n a O � «7 °l ' � � ', y. N �.. 4y f1' 6' �. R, ^ �. C ,°�.� w �' u � � u � � " a 3 .S a' � a � �,~o_, ' en m ° c°'a ;a ,� °' � � � N � , � L° � `'3 $ c :ti '� E � " 3 '" c� ',-�^� .°" u w��, v�� o O x v ^c1 v ^+ � o -°1° w ', e q , G �° ' � �, � � c q `�u� c ° � a , �, °' a „°pis' °' �;;c w�' I.n v ci H a v � ° `� L; 3 a •d '� a �d A. 'a . � ..�°�.. : p u � �. v � '. � � � ¢� � � a o � � � p . � 3 N >y >. 7 �' � W ? .O . " ait .. ..W. N u R '0 � O u � a 'i) ,. � ..O .�. � �. lo �. � . � y � � ,•C`. �y � T y 5 .� � � ��. >. u �. � � �., � � v .. ... � m � w � � O i c�J � � � E G v�i � � ,.: � o �..�.. t° `= ��. ,�" � �, �v . .n � �°.�.. .° G a a � m . � ° . � :� �" ,c & ��.. .� � o y `� � c��i � � b ^"�, '� � � �3 A �a . � v � °' � '�on p„ •� o �� . „ti + � ° o avi � � p, ,�,'�' c v w °� ^ ; ^° � a. .o � „ °' o � a .c 3 u v C � u a. „ ^. ._�s:..__� ""' v �' � _.�c___.� ,°c..:_.�y' � y �''. � '� �_ " �....b.. _, �._�- o � � � �_. A �.. o � . o � y �.._.W .�._...�.. y _�_ Y � � � e� � w° m u o u ' o m '� � N q v a a ,. �p, 'n ��. �° o . � �� o � � � Q � . � � � e, n o. � � . N d' � b9 A . F � w N � � � v � p � � P+ � � � w � P� �k'i '� ', � a o a° v � w � a�C v .+, m � � F en aw+ .O u ". �v `�' o aai � � y > '; ,� � . � . > C u i� p .� ^a w. q a u a+ ��, v ia �. 'a a. P, 'v ,?; � u u. � � � � � a� O C G.� W� A� b a i. � v ^0 V Oa h .� O yGa'i � � ",._ o Q T y � . .° ; .� ,� e� � ` .a � � b � � u � .'n u� u aa -. o., '� q ; � '. A . � a �. � � �. � w �q o � C .M v� w ^c . � [ h N �n N u . "O 'Lf .. .0 A � � "� 3 ?. � i� � v y .o �D '. P� � '. � �O 't� �. � '� : .� tC^J �' 'J ii . ,.� � a q V ^' O a. � o � � � •5 � ,d o E :° ,d y ,� w � o v � o a`�i °' ; � v � 'a o _. ay'i � �. .� � � � � u m '� o `� o o aCi ��„° _. v o � � � � �° F� � c .., u b � �' a 'i H° C7 ' i'r� .. x '� � �. x C ; ca FC �¢ � w C �. � z O (7 ,.', a � �a t' � x � � � � � � � � x x � � � � � N N�'. N M I M�� M� eM N M. W CO V1 �D V1 h �O N M �D �O V1 3 �'; a, ". u . mp.. m�� v a, 3. mp�� m y 3 � d u 3 a, 3 "° o. aa '° ; a, a', 3 w >. a aa 3 r'' ?. 'n 3 w o. >. a a a a a I ai a' a a a a o, w w a a. a a a a a. a :<C w m c � C � �0 c '^ o c � '=' g [ � � ,y Q �� ° .Q 5 " � :- '°-' o ^ Q w `+ \ . �? Q � �S.'� ti •� w � � �. U .aV . �� ,,, � y d. :. � . � .� � � O U h � ��.. � ..�. S O 4: y., ,� ? � '° , a .s c�r � ia � fii O h � �' r " y `'� " . v �`C 0. y . ct �, �+ � o� �`�i W �i y � � c G •� ,� p� .� a �'.. py" � , 'o " � . � .� � � � -a � . a � � � . .. a � . o � o 0 o � - � 'n� '� v � ° � a �� G � � � $ '50 �" �� '�� ^�� v � • .°�' e a • ,�; . C - � '�' r, � .p w 4�' ' W ;� U W�� N '� :. �.�-�i .. W A a.� �. � �`n N` '�� : W� W 5 C7 h U � y c' �n p , � 'a ° � v ��.. � a�i : o � ... .� $ .�a. ..�a'. 'ct o � � � o q °' � ° .5 '�tl � 'v � 'b a V a : ,� � .. � q '.: .� � . . � N .`a1 u � . � "'v' `^� �� O `v a >. � ° u° a m m m a 'e'n c 3 ;; o°'n � ;� G r.� o.� b v:° ,,, �'� a �y ur� °; , a, >°', m o w � � � '� � o � � � �" � � '�° � � v ° o � v ; � a v� '� w A c7 a w 5:�3 v w a rx .° �'`S ra U w Z �n v � � �o '� .5 C � O N � A .n v � u b v � o 3 ,u° „ �' � � a a a�', � P d � ,ri � 0 5 � � , o � � � A y p � �. c � c, �� W C� � � � o p � A � � � .� �• •� u u ;� .a u � H N c " 3 o � '� y u 'cf . . _"�-� .. .n �° o = � e+ 'n �V � o a .n � u�t � � R .-v� �y O iy ;� a. �s ."C„ � 'J � C � � � � > ,y., � .� o a � � � F° a � a a � � M sf' M :3 m ;: 3 A, 3 a a a 0 �5 a°J. m � � `� � a �' � v a'z page 83 Planting for Success Additional Resources Sun Exposure Most pollinator-friendly plants prefer sites that receive full sun throughout most of the day and are mostly open, with few large trees. A southern exposure can provide the warmest habitat, but is not required. Plant Diversity Choosing a variety of plants with overlapping and sequential bloom periods will provide food for pollinators tl7roughout the seasons. Habitat Size and Shape Habitat patches that are bigger and closer to other patches are generally better than those that are smaller and more isolated from one another. However, even a small container garden can attract and support pollinators! Planting Layout Attracting Native Pollinators Our best-selling book highlights the role of native pollinators in natural ecosystems, gardens, and farms. This comprehensive guide includes information about pollinator ecology, detailed profiles of over 30 common bee genera, and habitat designs for multiple landscapes with over 50 pages of fully illustrated regional plant lists. Available in bookstores everywhere, and throngh wwwxerces.org/books. The Xerces Pollinator Conservation Resource Center Our Pollinator Conservation Resource Center includes regional information on pollinator plants, habitat conservation guides, nest management instructions, bee identification and monitoring resources, and directories of native pollinator plant nurseries. www.xerces. org/p ollinator-resource-center Flowers clustered uito clumps of one species will attract more pollinators than uidividual plants scattered through a habitat patch. LBdy BiYd JohnSon WildfloweP Cetttel' - -- Where space allows, plant clumps of the same species within a few `�e Xerces Society has collaborated with the Lady Bird Johnson feet of one another. Wildflower Center to create lists of plants that are attractive to native bees, bumble bees, honey bees, and other beneficial insects, as well Seeds orTransplants as plant lists with value as nesting materials for native bees. These It is usually cheaper to establish large habitat areas from seed; lists can be narrowed down with additional �riteria such as state, however, seeding native wIldflowers on a large-scale is an art unto soil moisture, bloorn time, and sunlight requirements. The Center's itself: For step-by-step instructions, see Establishing Pollinator ti'ebsite also features image galleries, how-to articles on native plant Meadows from Seed and the Pollinator Habitat Installation Guides gardening, and more. listed in the Additional Resources section. For smaller areas like �+'�^'�^'•Wildflower.org/conservation_pollinators gardens, transplants are usually easier to use and will bloom faster than plants started from seed. Protect Pollinators from Insecticides Although dependent on timing, rate, and method of application, all insecticides have the potential to poison or kill pollinators. Systemic insecticides in particular have received significant attention for their potential role in pollinator declines (unidacloprid, dinotefuran, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam are examples ofsystemic insecticides now found in various farm and garden products). Because plants absorb systemic insecticides as they grow, the chemicals become distributed throughout plant tissues and are sometimes present in pollen and nectar. You can help protect pollinators by avoiding the use of these and other insecticides. Before purchasing plants from nurseries and garden centers, be sure to ask whether they have been treated with insecticides. To read more about threats to pollinators from pesticides, please visit: www.xerces.org/pesticides. Estabiishing Pollinator Meadows from Seed These guidelines provide step-by-step instructions for establishing pollinator meadows from seed in areas that range in size from a small bacicyard garden up to an acre. Topics include: site selection, site preparation, plant selection, planting techniques, and ongoing management. www xerces.org/establishing-pollinator-meadows-from-seed Pollinator Habitat Installation Guides These regional guidelines, developed in collaboration with the USDAs Natural Resources Conservation Service, provide in-depth practical guidance on how to install foraging and nesting habitat for bees in the form of wildflower meadow plantings or linear rows of native flowering shrubs. Region-specific seed mixes and plant recommendations are included in the appendices of each guide. www.xerces.org/pollinator-conservation/agriculture/pollinator- habitat-installation-guides ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Acknowledgements Support, background information, and other contributions to this publication were generously provided by Rufus Isaacs's lab at Michigan State University,The Ceres Foundation, CS Fund, Disney Worldwide Conservation Fund, Irwin Andrew Porter Foundation,Turner Foundation, Inc., North Central Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education, and the USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service. Written by Nancy lee Adamson, Brianna Borders, Jessa Cruz, Sarah Foltz Jordan, Kelly GiII,lennifer Hopwood, Eric Lee-Mader, Ashley Minnerath, and Mace Vaughan. Designed by Kaitlyn Rich. Formatted by Sara Morris. PHOTO CREDITS: Nancy Lee Adamson,The Xerces Society: t. Aecole*: 3. Susan Ellis, Bugwood.org: 7. Sarah Foltz lordan,The Xerces Society: 4(inside and cover), 8(inside),10. Peter Gorman (pchgorman)*:17, 20, 24. Rich Hatfieid,The Xerces Society:14,15. Jennifer Hopwood,The Xerces Society:S.JanetandPhil": 21. Eric Lee-Mader, The Xerces Society: 9. Joshua Mayer (wackybadger)": S(cover). Dan Mullen (milesizz)":18, 22.Tom Potterfield (tgpotterfied)": 2, 6,11,13 (inside and cover),16. Scott Seigfreid:12,19, 23. *Ua flickr.com. Photographs remain under the copyright of the photographer. The Xerces Society is an equai opportunity employer and provider. 0 2015 byThe Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation. Updated September2015 page 84 1101 Vict�or�a Curve , Mendvta He��hts, �1N 5�i18 651.452.1&50 phone J 651.452.8940 fax � www.mendota-heights.com _ � T � 1 � CITY OF M�N�O�A H�fGH�� DATE: January 4, 2016 TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Administrator FROM: John R. Mazzitello, PE, PMP, MBA Public Works Director/City Engineer SUBJECT: Sump Pump Discharge to the Sanitary Sewer System BACKGROUND At the February 3, 2015 Goal Setting Work Session, City Council discussed the impacts to the sanitary sewer system of sump pumps illegally connected to the system. City Council Directed staff to public communications in the Heights Highlights, and inform building permit holders of the sump pump requirements throughout 2015, and requested the issue be revisited in 2016. City staff has published articles in the Heights Highlights newsletter (once as the cover story), and has been informing building permit applicants of the code requirements for sump pumps throughout the year. Both State Plumbing Code and Mendota Heights Municipal Code prohibit the discharge of sump pumps to the sanitary sewer system. Minnesota Plumbin� Code 4715.2700 Storm water shall not be drained into sewers intended for sanitary sewage only. Mendota Hei ts City Code 10-3-SB Surface Waters: It shall be unlawful to discharge or cause to be discharged into the municipal sewer system, either directly or indi�ectly, any roof, storm, surface or ground water of any type or kind, or water discharged from any air conditioning unit or system. (1981 Code 803 � 4) The City of Mendota Heights pays Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) a fee for sanitary sewer treatment that is bases on the total flow contribution to the MCES system. In 2014, the City's total annual flow increased by �60 million gallons (12.3%)*, resulting in an increase in annual fee by 9.83%. In addition to the rate increase, MCES also initially proposed a surcharge fee of $99,600 per year for the next 4 years for increasing flow over 10% in one year. Staff was able to convince MCES to remove this fee due to our ongoing sanitary sewer cleaning, televising, and lining program along with our manhole casting sealing program. It is widely believed that the sudden and dramatic increase in flow was due to the eXtremely wet spring experienced from March to July of 2014. A large quantity of snow from the preceding winter melted followed by several large rain storms. The season culminated with 4.8 inches of rain that fell between 12:30am and 1:OOpm on June 19, 2014. Wet weather impacts the sanitary sewer system by means of Inflow and Infiltration (I/I). I/I can come from cracks in sewer pipes, broken pipe joints, tree root penetrations, or manholes; but the most prevalent possibl�e s�ou��es for sudden increases in flow are illegal discharges to the sanitary sewer system. The most common of these discharges are basement sump pumps. Both MCES and the American Public Works Association (APWA) have published figures stating 60%-70% of sudden increases in flow volume are likely due to sump pumps connected to the sanitary sewer system. Based on some logical assumptions about sump pump behavior from the past spring, staff has calculated that �39 million gallons of the �60 million gallons* in increased flow (65%) is likely due to sump pumps. In order to minimize or eliminate these discharges, a policy would need to be developed and implemented, including public communications, and inspections. In 2005, the City of Eagan experienced a similar phenomenon due to an extremely large rain event. By 2009, they had adopted a policy and Ordinance to address sump pumps. The Eagan plan was implemented in 2010. A copy of their policy is attached for reference. Eliminating, ar greatly reducing the contribution to the sanitary sewer system from sump pumps would allow for a more predictable total sewer flow projection and make the budget process for the sanitary sewer utility fund more stable. It would also greatly reduce the risk of future severe flow increases and avoid future penalty surcharges. BUDGETIMPACT UI contributions to the sanitary sewer system have a direct impact on the amount charged to the City by MCES. Consequently, I/I contributions directly impact what the City needs to charge residents and businesses far sanitary sewer service to keep the utility fund operable and stable. Eliminating non-sewage contributions to the sanitary sewer system can provide a much more stable and predictable cost of utility operations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council consider implementing an Inflow and Infiltration (UI) Program/Policy similar to that enacted by the City of Eagan in 2009. If Council wishes to implement the staff recommendation, Council should establish this Program/Policy as a goal for 2016, and direct staff to begin working on policy documents, Ordinance, costs, and public communications. page 86 CITY OF EAGAN Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Miti�ation Pro�ram/Polic Adopted December 15, 2009 Revised January 19, 2010 Back�round The Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES) implemented an Infiltration & Inflow (I&� Mitigation and Surcharge Program on February 8, 2006. I&I relates to extraneous clean water entering the sanitary sewer system through either ground water (Infiltration) or direct flow (Inflow) such as sump pumps. This excess volume of clean water adds considerable cost to the overal] Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) for both conveyance and treatment. As a result of a significant 5" rainfall event that occurred on Oct. 5, 2005, the City of Eagan was determined to have had an excessive rate of flow to the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant eXceeding its peak flow allocation. As a result of this exceedance, the MCES determined that the City of Eagan was required to spend $1,718,500 over 5 years (�$343,700/yr) to either mitigate its eXcessive I&I, or pay that amount to the MCES for its equivalent expansion of the MDS. MCES enforced this financial obligation through an annual surcharge program beginning in 2007 and scheduled to end in 2012. If excessive flows continue to occur after that date, the annual surcharge will likely become a permanent Demand Charge (in an amount yet to be determined). The City continuously evaluates the public sanitary sewer system (275 miles of pipe, 7,800 manholes and 18 pumping stations) and performs corrective measures as needed. However, to adequately address the excessive I&I, there is also a need to inspect and mandate corrective work in the private sanitary sewer system within the community (over 18,800 connections). Program The private property inspection program has been commonly referred to as a"Sump Pump and Service Lateral Inspection Program" (SP&SLIP). Many communities have already implemented this type of inspection with a related corrective enforcement program which can take up to multiple years and millions of dollars to complete on a citywide basis. It requires the personal inspection of a private property's internal sewer plumbing system and service lateral connection to the City's sewer main (typically in the street or a backyard easement). On September 1, 2009, the Eagan City Council adopted an amendment to City Code Section 3.40 to add Subdivision 10, "Clear Water Discharge Prevention and Prohibition" (attached). This amendment prohibits any type of clear water connections or faulty services that allow ground water to enter the system. It also requires all notified property owners to schedule an inspection with the city, or its designated agent(s). This inspection typically takes up to 2 hours to perform and requires that an adult resident be present at all times. A copy of the inspection report identifying any non-compliant issues will be left with the resident upon completion of the inspection. Corrective Work Orders will be sent to the property owner/occupant informing them page 87 of the required corrective work that must be completed within 60 days. Upon satisfactary completion of the Corrective Work, a Certificate of Compliance will be issued by the City. If either an inspection is not scheduled, or required corrective work is not completed, within the required time frames, a monthly surcharge will be added to the property owner's utility bill until such time as an inspection is performed and/or all corrective work is completed. (See attached Work Flow Process diagrammatic) Non-compliant Enforcement Surcharges City Code 3.40 (Rules and regulations relating to sewer service), Subdivision 10 (Clear Water Discharge Prevention and Prohibition), Paragraph E(Surcharges) provides for monthly surcharges to be added to the property's utility bill resulting from any cause that results in a lack of a Compliance Certification being issued. The amount of the I&I Surcharge for non- compliance will be established by formal Council action and incorporated into the Annual Fee Schedule. Per the Code, the I&I Surcharge becomes effective for the entire month when the final notice of Non-Compliance was sent to the property owner/resident and every month thereafter until such time that a Compliance Certificate has been issued. Nonpayment of delinquent fees and/or surcharges will be certified to the property's taxes for collection. City Cost Partici�ation Other communities' experiences have indicated that the majority of corrective work requirements relate to a simple disconnection and rerouting of a sump pump discharge. However, there have been situations where foundation drain disconnections and/or service lateral repairs become more costly. In respect to the cost savings expected to the City's future sewer billings from the Metropolitan Council, the City Council deemed it justifiable to offer financial participation for corrective repairs to low and medium density residential properties (R-1,2 & 3). The City will assume responsibility for 50% of costs incurred by the homeowner for required corrective work (Permit Fees not included). If the corrective work is not performed under a City issued contract, the property owner may perform the work personally. While all material costs will be eligible for reimbursement, only work performed by a licensed plumber and/or pipe-layer contractor pre- approved by the City will be eligible for City participation. If the property owner elects to perform the work through a private contractor, the City will issue payment upon receipt of proper documentation for the City's share, made payable to both the private contractor and property owner. Cit_y Financing of Propert_y Owner costs The Property Owner may elect to have all, or any part, of their actual costs incurred levied as a special assessment against the benefitted property spread over 5 years and financed at 4% simple interest. This will require the execution of the appropriate Waiver of Hearing and Special Assessment agreement. APPROVED BY COLTNCIL ACTION: December 15, 2009 REVISED: January 19, 2010 page 88 �c� �,� :, :��,�, ��:�e�,�� i i � �r� �� 651.452185�� E�hone � �S1A52,8940 lax, ` www.mendota heights.com _ _ � � CITY OF M�N��TA H�I�HT� DATE: January 4, 2016 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Mark McNeill, City Administrator SUBJECT: 2016 City Legislative Priorities Introduction: In previous years, the City Council has identified its priorities for action by the Minnesota Legislature. The City Council should do that again for the 2016 session. Background: In reviewing topics of interest of which I have been aware, it appears that at least the following topics should be seen as issues of high importance for Mendota Heights: • Relief for Cities of under 15,000 from full Fiscal Disparities contributions • Special PERA Legislation for Fire Chief • Support for state bonding money for TH 110 grade separated pedestrian crossing. • Group Home Legislative Reform • Oppose any efforts to disband the Noise Oversight Committee At the January 4t" Goal Setting meeting, the Council will be asked to consider and potentially adopt these, and any other issues as may be discussed, as being of a high priority for the legislative action by the 2016 Minnesota Legislature. Action Required: The Council should identify the priorities to be adopted as its 2016 Legislative priorities. Mark McNeill City Administrator