1996-05-28 Planning Comm MinutesCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
MAY 28,1996
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on
Tuesday, May 28, 1996, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve.
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. The following members were
present: Koll, Betlej, Duggan, Lorberbaum and Tilsen. Chair Dwyer and
Commission Friel were excused. Also present were Public Works Director Jim
Danielson, Planning Consultant Lynne Rabuse, Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser and
Administrative Intern Patrick Hollister.
Commissioner Koll moved approval of the April 23, 1996 minutes with
corrections.
Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 96-13:
SCHOMMER -
TE47 YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
Mr. and Mrs. Mel Schommer, of 1024 Victoria Court, were present to
discuss their request for a rear yard setback variance which would allow the
construction of a screen porch on the back of the house off of the kitchen
area.
Mr. and Mrs. Schommer explained that they bought the house five years
ago and had always planned to construct a three season porch. They
explained that they did not realize that they would need a rear yard setback
variance. They explained that they would like to enjoy the use of their
backyard while not being annoyed by mosquitoes and air noise.
Commissioner Koll stated she had visited the area and she noted that there
were no stakes marking where the proposed addition will be placed. She
1
asked for clarification as to the placement of the addition.
In response to a question from Commissioner Betlej, Mr. Schommer stated
the screen porch addition will be glass and that there will be a sliding door
entrance to a patio stone area. Commissioner Betlej asked for clarification
regarding the construction of a step leading to the patio area. Mr.
Schommer stated a step will be constructed on the east side of the addition.
Planner Rabuse confirmed that an additional variance is not necessary.
Commissioner Betlej stated that if a step is needed, the step should be
included on the plans for Council review.
Commissioner Lorberbaum read an excerpt from the City's Zoning Ordinance
regarding the Variance process and how an applicant should prove practical
difficulty or hardship. Mr. Schommer discussed the original placement of
his home and how the floor plan of his house dictates where he intends to
place his porch addition. Commissioner Tilsen stated that a practical
difficulty applies to this case since the house was placed on the high portion
of the lot which left minimal back yard space and the existing floor plan
dictates where the addition can be placed.
Vice Chair Duggan stated that all signatures of consent have been received.
Commissioner Koll moved to waive the public hearing.
Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Koll moved to recommend that the City Council approve a ten
foot variance which would allow the construction of a three season porch
twenty feet from the rear property line.
Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion.
The Commission acknowledged that a practical difficultly exists due to the
shape of the lot, house placement and floor plan.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 96-14:
WEISENBURGER -
REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE
2
Mr. and Mrs. Ken Weisenburger, of 2350 Pueblo Drive, were presented to
discuss their request for a rear yard setback variance which would allow the
construction of a 24' by 24' addition on the back of their house.
Mr. Weisenburger explained the history behind why the addition is needed.
He explained that their original intentions were to enlarge the eating space
and kitchen. He explained that they had researched adding to the front of
their house and realized that it would be too expensive. He explained that
they then considered constructing a 20' by 30' addition to the rear of their
house which would create additional living room space and allow for the
reorganization of their eating space while creating a lower level bedroom
area. He stated that they were unable to pursue this option because it
would require block and excavating work under the garage area.
Weisenburger explained that they decided to make the room 24' by 24'
which would not infringe on their garage and still give them the needed
space for their large family. He stated that a smaller addition, which would
eliminate the need for a variance would be useless to them.
Weisenburger stated that their practical difficulty is the small Friendly Hills
lot and the placement of the house on their lot. He stated that their home is
placed in the center of their lot which dictates where an addition can be
added to the home. He stated that they have spoken to their neighbors and
have received signatures of consent from all of them.
Commissioner Tilsen stated that he visited the site and that he had
measured the lot dimensions. He inquired about the setback from the north
property line and he wondered if a variance would be needed to bring the
house into conforming status. Planner Rabuse stated that it is not
necessary as this setback would be considered grandfathered status.
Tilsen suggested that a revised map indicating the correct dimensions be
submitted for Council review.
He stated that the Weisenburger lot is a corner lot which is treated
differently than most lots in the City. He stated that this lot has an
additional thirty foot setback requirement. Tilsen stated that while he does
not like to see backyards with less than thirty feet of frontage, he feels that
this is a good request. He stated that the Weisenburger's have indicated
that they plan to do a considerable amount of landscaping.
Commissioner Betlej noted the size of the structure to be 40-45 percent of
the existing floor space. Mr. Weisenburger responded that they intend to
construct a full basement which would create bedrooms. He stated that
3
that size of the structure includes not only living area but also closet space.
Weisenburger stated they are trying to improve their property and that it
would not be smart for them to reduce the size of the addition.
Commissioner Betlej inquired about the roof line. Weisenburger responded
that the roof line is higher as it allows for a vaulted ceiling in the proposed
living room. He stated that with the addition, they would lose a window
and that the vaulted ceiling would allow them to install a sky light. He
stated that the peak of the roof line will barely be seen from the north side
of the house.
In response to a question from Commissioner Koll, Mr. Weisenburger stated
the deck will not be screened in and the steps will be on the side of the
deck near the garage back door. Koll inquired about landscaping. Mr.
Weisenburger stated that he would like to install low hedges along the side
of the addition. He mentioned that they had planted a tree about three
years ago along the west side of his house and that a boulevard tree has
also been planted in that area. He stated that they are limited in planting
trees in this area due to a power pole.
Commissioner Koll inquired about construction and whether any trees will be
damaged. Mr. Weisenburger stated no trees will be damaged and that he
will need to remove fence posts to allow construction equipment in the
backyard.
Commissioner Duggan inquired about placing the stairs in a different
location. Mr. Weisenburger explained that the stairs have been placed in
this location due to a drain the system.
Planner Rabuse informed the Commission that according to Section 4.6(3)c
of the Zoning Ordinance, the set of stairs are exempt from the variance
process as they do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of
the principal building and do not extend closer than two (2) feet from the lot
line. Commissioner Betlej stated that the variance should be 3.33 feet less.
Vice Chair Duggan stated that signatures of consent have been received
from all neighbors.
Commissioner Tilsen inquired about the "Vacant" signature at 2350 Pagel
Road. Mr. Weisenburger explained that this house is for sale and that there
is no one living there. He informed the Commission that City staff felt that
he had reasonably researched the status of the owner and that City staff
felt that the vacant signature was appropriate.
0
Commissioner Koll moved to waive the required public hearing.
Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Koll moved to recommend that the City Council grant a 3.5
foot variance which would allow the construction of an addition and deck to
the single family house 26.5 feet from the rear property line.
Vice Chair Duggan seconded the motion.
The Commission acknowledged that a practical difficulty exists due to the
size of the lot and the placement of the home on the lot.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
CASE NO. 96-15:
ORME -
VARIANCE
Mr. John Orme, of 1975 Walsh Lane, was present to discuss his request for
a front yard setback variance which would allow the construction of a new,
attached garage.
Mr. Orme explained that his house was constructed in the 1800s and that
the existing house and garage were placed only sixteen feet from the
property line. He explained that the existing garage needs to be torn down
as the walls have deteriorated due to water problems. He explained that the
old garage has a flat roof and that the new garage will have a gabled roof to
match the house. He stated that he intends to install a new driveway.
In response to a question from Commissioner Lorberbaum, Mr. Orme
explained that roof on the porch is a hip roof. He explained that the new
garage roof will look like the porch roof. He stated that the roof line has
been designed to make one roof line all the way around the house. He
stated that the garage materials will consist of block, woodframe and stucco
siding. He stated that the existing materials do not match and that with the
new garage, the house and garage will all match.
Commissioner Lorberbaum inquired about the evergreen tree. Mr. Orme
stated that the evergreen tree will be tree spaded and moved to his
backyard.
0
Commissioner Betlej inquired about drainage. Mr Orme explained that the
new roof line will help the drainage problem. He stated that the house does
not have gutters and that is why the current garage needs to be replaced.
Vice Chair Duggan suggested that Mr. Orme submit better drawings for
Council review.
Mr. Orme clarified that the new garage will be just six feet larger than the
existing garage. He further stated that the existing redwood fence will need
to be removed.
Vice Chair Duggan stated that all signatures of consent have been received.
Commissioner (Coll moved to waive the required public hearing.
Commissioner Tllsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Vice Chair Duggan suggested that signage be placed on Victoria Road
cautioning motorists of the construction. Public Works Director Danielson
responded that Victoria Road is a County Road and the applicant will need
to speak with Dakota County .
Commissioner Tilsen moved to recommend that the Council grant a variance
for a 26° by 30° attached garage sixteen feet from the front property line.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
Vice Chair Duggan offered a friendly amendment by stating that the
applicant submit improved drawings for Council review.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Mr. Tim Stovern, Hybrid Enterprises, Inc., was present to discuss a request
for a wetlands permits which would allow the construction of a fence at
2277 Copperfield Drive.
Stovern explained that Mr. and Mrs. Rosenblum would like to install a 60"
0
tall fence in their backyard. He stated that the fence would be four inches
off of the property line and run the perimeter of the backyard. He explained
that two gates would attach the fence to the house with a third gate in the
rear giving access to the pond. He explained the fence would extend to
within twenty five feet from the water's edge at the back of the lot.
Stovern explained that the fence will be Bufftech Vinyl "white" with posts
placed every 96". Stovern stated the material is like fiberglass and that it is
under a twenty five year warranty. He explained that a fence like this has
been installed in Mendakota Estates.
Commissioner Tilsen noted that the City has permitted similar fences in the
area under wetlands permits (three fences).
Vice Chair Duggan stated that signatures of consent of have been received.
Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to waive the required public hearing.
Commissioner Koll seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to recommend that the City Council grant
a wetlands permit which would allow the construction of a fence within 25
feet of the wetlands.
Vice Chair Duggan seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
HEARING:
• -
CUP
Mr. Daniel Wolff, of 600 Spring Street, was present to discuss his request
for a conditional use permit which would allow the construction of a 24' by
26' unattached garage.
Mr. Wolff explained that he intends to replace his existing 16' by 22'
garage. He stated that the new garage will be in a different location than
the existing garage. He explained that the existing garage is eight feet from
the house and five feet from the side property line. He explained that the
N
proposed garage would be ten feet from the side property line and twenty
four feet back from the house to enable access to both garage doors by
vehicles.
Commissioner Koll inquired if the birch tree is dying. Mr. Wolff responded
that yes and that it has to be removed to accommodate the garage.
Vice Chair Duggan inquired if frost footings will be poured. Mr. Wolff
responded yes.
Commissioner Koll inquired about future plantings. Mr. Wolff responded
that in the future, another tree may be needed. Commissioner Koll stated
that the new garage will not affect the area and that it will be a nice
addition to the neighborhood.
Mr. Wolff confirmed that there will be no grading changes and that there
will be electricity available in the garage.
Vice Chair Duggan opened the meeting to the public.
There was no one present to discuss this request.
Commissioner Betlej moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Tilsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Commissioner Lorberbaum moved to recommend that the City Council
approve the Conditional Use Permit with the following conditions:
1 Removal of all the existing garage material within one month of
completion of the new garage
2. The color and style of the garage to match the house.
Commissioner Betlej seconded the motion.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Vice Chair Duggan called a recess at 8:45 p.m.
Vice Chair Duggan reconvened the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
HEARING:
CASE NO. 96-18:
NORTHERN STATES POWER -
CUP FOR ESSENTIAL SERVICE,
CUP FOR MINING
Mr. Pat Cline, Community Service Manage for NSP, was present along with
NSP representatives, Joe Mansur, Sheldon Silverman and Dave Callahan, to
discuss NSP's request for a Conditional Use permit for Essential Service and
a Conditional Use Permit for Mining which would allow alterations to the
existing utility substation off of Dodd Road near the Mendakota Estates
subdivision (2201 Dodd Road).
Mr. Callahan, Senior Right -of -Way Agent, discussed the scope of work in
the proposed Roger's Lake Substation project:
1 Excavation of the northeast corner of the substation and installation
of a retaining wall to make room for additional electrical equipment.
2. Installation of a new 11 5kV steel bay with associated bus -work,
insulators, breakers and switches.
3. Installation of three 80 MVAR, 11 5kV Capacitor Banks with
associated breakers and switches.
4. Expansion of the existing control house to add the protection and
controls for the new electrical equipment being added.
5. Removal of a 11 5kV/69kV, 47 MVA Transformer Bank and associated
69kV bus work and line termination.
Callahan stated the new 11 5kV steel bay will provide load -relief to NSP's
69kV transmission system in Dakota County. He stated that its addition will
also result in a more reliable transmission service to Rogers Lake Substation
and its customers.
Callahan explained the 11 5kV capacitor bank additions will provide much
needed voltage support for the metro east 11 5kV transmission system
under normal as well as contingency operating conditions.
N.
Callahan explained that the removal of the 11 5/69kV Transformer Bank will
also eliminate the strongest source of electrical noise from the substation
site. He stated that the transformer being removed is the noisiest of the
three and that it will result in a reduction of noise level at the north fence
line from 49db to approximately 47db.
Callahan explained that additional equipment will be added to the vacant
northeast corner of the substation. He stated that grading is necessary to
flatten the site. He stated that the fence will be removed and that a sheet
pile type retaining wall is planned to support the excavated slope at the
northeast corner. He stated that NSP feels that the wall can be constructed
from within the NSP substation property. However, NSP is seeking
permission from the City to utilize a narrow strip of bordering City Park
property along this northeast corner for construction activity if building the
retaining wall totally from within NSP property process difficult. He stated
that if NSP utilizes the park property they will be responsible for restoring
any damaged grass, trees, and/or vegetation to its original condition.
Callahan explained that a line from the east into the substation will be
rerouted within their property and three additional poles seventy five feet
high will be constructed to support the line.
Callahan stated that this project will cost approximately $4.5 million and
that work is anticipated to begin in 1996 and continue into 1997. He stated
that with the completion of this work, the Roger's Lake Substation will have
essentially realized its full development.
Callahan explained that there will be significant associated work with this
project, particularly related to landscaping and noise. He explained that NSP
representatives have met with City staff to discuss berming and plantings
on City owned park property. He stated that berming would help reduce
sound to the north. He stated that City staff asked that NSP present a
"Concept Plan" to the Parks and Recreation Commission and the City
Council.
Callahan displayed digital computer imaging picture to show the effects of
berming and landscaping. His picture was an overhead view graph of the
existing substation (standing in the park looking south at the substation).
He explained that an existing berm can be extended on the south site of the
trail and increased on the north extend it to where the new equipment will
be installed. Callahan reviewed a computer image which showed an
example of how the substation would look after increasing the berm height
and adding plantings to help screen the property.
W
Planner Rabuse inquired about the location of the three new poles. Mr.
Callahan reviewed a computer image indicating that the poles will be placed
in a triangular position with each pole being seventy five feet (near an
existing pole that is ninety five feet).
In response to a question from Planner Rabuse, Mr. Callahan stated that an
existing six foot high chain link fence with barb wire will be re -installed on
top of the retaining wall once that work is completed.
Vice Chair Duggan noted his concern with the fifteen foot drop on the
northeast corner of the property and also his concern with softening the site
line as you are looking from the west to east. Mr. Callahan stated that
there are trees and that they would need to review this further. Mr.
Callahan stated that NSP has been working with Mr. Frank Friedmann,
Mendakota Estates resident, to help soften Mr. Friedmann's site line
concerns with landscape.
Commissioner Tilsen noted that NSP plans are not all signed by engineers.
He suggested that NSP submit signed plans for City Council review.
Commissioner Tilsen noted his concern regarding the fifteen foot high wall
and the height of the equipment. Tilsen inquired about the retaining wall
material. Callahan responded that it will be a steel sheet pile type retaining
wall.
Tilsen inquired if there will be any hazardous materials removed from the
site. Mr. Callahan responded no.
Tilsen inquired if NSP has reviewed alternative designs. Mr. Callahan stated
that there is only a small area that can be graded in the compound area for
their use and that they intend to utilize that property in terms of locating the
needed equipment.
Vice Chair Duggan inquired if NSP will be using the gravel road to access
the site and he inquired if the toad size/width is sufficient to handle
equipment. Public Works Director Danielson informed the Commission that
the gravel road is a private road owned and maintained by NSP.
Vice Chair Duggan stated that NSP will need to discuss with the City its
intentions for utilizing City owned park property. Mr. Callahan responded
that they intend to ask for a temporary construction permit and that they
will restore any damage to the property.
11
In response to a question from Commissioner Koll, Mr. Callahan explained
that the gravel road is located on the south side of the Mendakota Park
softball field and that it is under the power line.
Tilsen stated that while the removal of the transformer may decrease the
noise, the noise level may increase as a result of the proposed retaining
wall. He stated his concern for increasing noise levels, especially to the
Mendakota Estates neighborhood. Mr. Callahan responded that with the
removal of the transformer the noise source is expected to decrease 2db in
all directions. Tilsen felt that the retaining wall will aggravate the situation.
Callahan responded that while it is true that the noise will bounce off of the
retaining wall, the noise levels reaching the wall be less due to the removal
of the transformer. Tilsen suggested that NSP install a stone retaining wall.
Callahan responded further that NSP needs to adhere to MPC guidelines for
noise propagation along with City Ordinances. Callahan stated that there is
not sufficient space to install a stone retaining wall. Callahan stated that
the noise situation is unpredictable and that NSP is confident that there will
be a noise reduction. He stated that if the noise were to increase, NSP will
have to deal with it.
In response to a question from Vice Chair Duggan, Mr. Callahan stated that
the transformer being removed is the noisiest. He briefly discussed the
logarithmic scale in measuring noise.
Tilsen stated he wants to be sure that noise will not be increased in a
different area.
In response to a question from Vice Chair Duggan, Mr. Callahan explained
the type of materials the transformers consist of. Callahan stated that this
is standard substation equipment and that NSP will take readings to see
what the effects are after removing the transformer.
In response to a question from Commission Tilsen, Mr. Sheldon Silverman,
NSP Electrical Engineer, explained the design of the wall and the limitations
in constructing the wall due to a propane pipeline near the property line.
Tilsen stated that NSP should be maximizing the use of its property. Mr.
Silverman responded that NSP has already compromised and that they can
not get any closer to the property line due to the pipeline location.
Commissioner Tilsen noted his concern for potential problems and that the
City needs to take a proactive approach in assuring its residents that adding
the wall will not increase noise. Mr. Silverman stated that sound decreases
rapidly with distance.
im
Commissioner Lorberbaum suggested that the City require NSP to check the
noise levels before and after construction. She inquired when the NSP site
was initially constructed. Silverman responded that the land was purchased
in 1923. Mr. Callahan stated that they are unclear as to when the
equipment was constructed. A discussion ensued about the dates on the
NSP plans. It was noted that one plan is dated 1982. Mr. Callahan
responded that revision dates have been indicated on the plans.
Commissioner Lorberbaum inquired if NSP has been granted a CUP for the
existing fence. Planner Rabuse stated that the fence is an existing non-
conforming use. Lorberbaum felt that the fence should be include in the
Conditional Use Permit approval process. She cited Section 4.8(3)b of the
Zoning Ordinance.
Commissioner Betlej stated that he would like to not see three seventy five
foot poles erected. He inquired if the lines could be rerouted to allow less
poles. Mr. Callahan responded that NSP does not want to bring in any lines
over the capacitor bank. Betlej stated that the poles are an intrusion to the
park and Dodd Road. He felt that one pole could be erected near the
equipment building around the new capacitor. Mr. Silverman stated that
that pole would then be seventy five to eighty feet high. Betlej stated that
there is already a seventy five foot pole constructed on top of a berm. Mr.
Silverman stated that NSP could eliminate two poles with a higher, more
massive structure. Betlej reiterated his concern with the pole profile and
height.
Commissioner Betlej inquired about installing evergreen trees on top of the
berm. Mr. Callahan stated that NSP landscape designer is flexible. Betlej
suggested that NSP install deciduous trees with larger canopies. Mr.
Callahan noted his concern with planting trees with leaves. He explained
that these trees do not screen well, particularly during the winter time. Mr.
Callahan recommended that coniferous trees be planted. Planner Rabuse
suggested that NSP submit a detailed landscape plan for City review.
Commissioner Betlej stated that he would like to see a combination of
different type trees.
Betlej inquired about security during the construction process. Mr. Callahan
stated that the site will be secure at all times.
Betlej cited Section 20.12 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Electric
Emissions. Mr. Callahan stated that NSP must comply with all government
regulatory guidelines. He stated that the normal transformer operation is 60
cycles which is low relative to radio and television frequency.
13
Commissioner Betlej stated that no elevation plans including the poles were
submitted and that Council should have this information.
The Commission discussed how the poles will be constructed. Mr. Callahan
stated that soil engineering work has been completed. He further stated
that they do not intend on disturbing the drainage. He informed the
Commission that there are several easements in the area.
Commissioner Koll inquired about park restoration and the color of the
poles. Mr. Callahan responded that the poles will be painted with American
Standard Grey since this color tends to blend into the sky background. He
stated that pole maintenance is required.
Commissioner Koll stated that she would like to see a landscape plan, plans
on repairing the park and consistent noise checks. She stated that the city
should have the ability to require changes should the noise not be reduced
once the work has been completed.
In response to a question from Commissioner Lorberbaum, Mr. Callahan
explained that electric magnetic fields are associated with currents not
voltage. He explained that high voltage reduces currents and that capacitor
banks do not contribute to the high voltage. He explained that with the
removal of the transformer, the magnetic field will be reduced. He stated
that the currents are limited to the substation. He stated that they do not
expect additional currents.
Commissioner Tilsen inquired about FAA guidelines related to the proposed
pole height. He inquired if the City needs to check with the FAA. Public
Works Director Danielson explained that the water tower is considered the
low end of the flight glide path and that this area is not of concern.
Vice Chair Duggan opened the meeting to the public.
Jann Blesener, 848 Mendakota Park, stated she sent a letter to NSP three
years ago regarding the noise problem. She stated that the noise is
offensive and that she has asked NSP to mitigate the noise.
Frank Friedmann, 906 Mendakota, stated that NSP has not addressed the
visual or acoustic aspects affecting residents to the west. He stated that
Mr. Callahan has been out to discuss berming ideas which would be
installed at his own expense. He noted his concern for noise echoing off of
the wall. He stated there is no barrier to the west side of the station.
14
Vice Chair Duggan inquired if the berm could be raised an additional three
feet. Mr. Callahan responded that he is uncertain as it depends upon the
footprint. He stated the south berm is confined.
Jack Blesener, 848 Mendakota Park, stated there is plenty of room to
construct a berm between the pathway and the fence area. Mr. Callahan
stated that there may be some limitations. Mr. Callahan stated that NSP is
willing to work with the City to mitigate noise and aesthetics.
Commissioner Tilsen stated that NSP should look at landscaping at all four
sides with adding berming and vegetation which should all be aesthetically
pleasing both on City property and other private properties. He stated the
City needs to look at the whole project.
Vice Chair Duggan inquired about extending the wood wall barrier. Mr.
Callahan stated that they will need to review this further.
In response to a question from the Commission, Mr. Joe Mansur, NSP,
explained what areas the substation serves.
Vice Chair Duggan inquired about the construction timeline. Mr. Callahan
stated that they would like to move as fast as possible.
Ms. Blesener suggested that NSP work with not only the City in developing
a landscape plan but also with the Mendakota Estate neighborhood.
The Commission discussed tabling this request in order to allow time for
NSP to appear before the Parks and Recreation Commission to discuss
landscape possibilities. Administrative Intern Hollister informed the Planning
Commission that June 11 is the next Parks and Recreation Commission
meeting.
Commissioner 'Pilsen moved to close the public hearing.
Commissioner (Coll seconded the motion.
Commissioner Betlej noted his concern for closing the public hearing since
there seems to be a lot of loose ends left to discuss. He stated that the
Planning Commission needs to research this request further.
AYES: 5
NAYS: 0
Vice Chair Duggan moved to recommend that the City Council grant a
M
Conditional Use Permit for essential services, a Conditional Use Permit for
Mining and a Conditional Use Permit for a fence conditioned upon the
following:
1. NSP working with the Parks and Recreation Commission, City
Engineering staff and Mendakota Estates residents in developing a
comprehensive landscape plan which should include additional
berming and vegetation which should mitigate noise and visual
aesthetics.
2. Check noise levels before and after construction.
3. Look at eliminating one pole.
4. Submit drainage plans.
Commissioner 'Tilsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 2
NAYS: 3, KOLL, L®RBERBAUM, BETLEJ
MOTION FAILS
Commissioner Betlej moved to continue the discussion to the June 25
Planning Commission meeting which would allow time for NSP time to
prepare a comprehensive landscape plan and resolve other Planning
Commission concerns related to noise levels, eliminating one pole and
drainage.
Commissioner Lorberbaum seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 1, DUGGAN
VERBAL REVIEW
Public Works Director Danielson gave a brief review on recent Planning
Cases discussed by the City Council.
M
There being no further business, the Planning Commission moved to adjourn
its meeting at 10:53 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
17