1965-09-08 Planning Comm Minutes8,,-Ttember 8, 1965
Th meeting c 1.11 tI2E, villwo hall at 800 with Le Lust:0,,
Tom Libera, Fred Brass, Dick Bancroft and Hardy Wrigi:t present.
Also present were Ed Stringer and Dale Pollock. Present re Case 65-1L
were Jean Parranto representing the avplicants, Robert Sabin, 1189 Rogs-s Ro.„
and K. M., Erickson, 2021 i, 55. Re Case 65-20 were Vernon Palm of ke177 O
and John Lyon. With an inquiry on availability of pablic water were MssrL
-
LockimcryT:r„ Kelly and Dockstrude of 1903, 1901 and 1905 Lexington_ Present
re Case 65-21 was James Bayer.
2 Case 65-15 rezoning requests of Parmato Bres,, discussion resumed.
Tom 1,5.berw is there substantial change in. laad use to 'iim.i reooning?
Dale Pollock; Highways were anticiy)ated but not complexity of the interchange.
Tom Mbar& We shoald observe 'substantiaI chnge2 requirement to regone.
Dick Bancroft; Change in :tread away from large i1 -J in suburbs in substantial
Jean Parlato; Final plignment of Mendota Mts. Rd. ie substantial cVange.
2a Motion by Idbera, 2nd by Wright that the hearing be reopened. Ayes 5 mayes 0,
Robert Sabin; Notice of heaping was too short, reed his 2 weeks after date,
Thera Le distinct difference between B -1-A and 1-1 and B -1-A development
would not adversely affect properties along Rogers Rd. --not objecting to
retuning of the Dawson and Cavender areas, Cites location of school nearby
and feels that the Rogers Rd, residences would become narrow island of
residentially used pro)erty in a sea of indastry.
K. M, Erickson; The interests of taxpayers thronghout the school district
should also be represented, the difficulty of attracting B -1-A clients to this
area recognised anE the applintus re tic of $1 million valuation for
6 acres weighed in t140.(1.
Jean Parranto; Of the five separate requestsall tions pertain to one.
While reiterating that the one on Ht 55 would be the front yard of the en:tiro
park, that adequate screening along Rogers Rd. would be done, and that the
normal 1 -story inustrial development should be preferrod by residents to
probably higher structures in B -1 -ii -- the general proposal for an industrial
park could be -oersued. without resoninp: of the one parcel.
2b Motion by l'aacroft that the commission reacmoend to tle council that rezoning
be denied on t;.at portion of the application coveed by separate :Letter
request for tHi propvIrty bounded en thD north by Rogers Rd„, on the south
by Mendota,e1,1 tci Rd., and on the weit by 55; furter, that reooning
be aroved on e1; four requests, changing the sone of the property
bounded on tie AOPP61; by Mendeta Heights Rd. and on the west by ;u7.55 froT
to D-2 and of the balance of the propqrty covered by tci application
from B -i, to X-1. Motion seconded by Llbera. Ayes 5,-nayes 0.
3 Case 65»20 •Mr. Palm clarifi6d that ti.e penciled area on the original plot
plan indicates total developed and surfacq,d area, and that tere not
been orportnnity to submit a revised plot plan. The entire planner's report
was discussed, a discrepancy of 10 painted out in 1troa 4 (3 instead of 13')
and willngness. to amply on all items indicated,
4
6
7
MJPC Minutes
-2- 9-8-65
Mswes, Lookimeyer, Kelly, Bockstrude inquired about the possibility of
tying into the Lexington water main, The commission recommended that
the residents directly concerned involve as many property owners as
possible in discussion of the ultimate development of their land in
tie general area bounded by Lexington, Ord-ard, -unter and ..wy.110.
Motion by Bemcroft, seconded by Wright that Dale Pollock be authorized
to go out and make a cursory survey of the area. Ayes 5, nayes O.
Case 63-21
ApplicantJames Bayer, 1038 View Lame
Requestg Determination of whetl:er double garage Gould be located two
feet from property line and extending in front of house as shown
Dispositiong the Commission recommended to ti.e applicant that 1-1/2 garage
be attac}hed to use -present driveway.
Oases 65-17 and 18 Mendota Development Co.
Motion by Bancroft, second by Lustig that the applications be returned
for separation of legal descriptions as indicated by village attorney.
Ayes 5, nes O.
Case 65-19 Travel Coach Company
Plan on hearing October 13 if certificates of ownership received in time
for publication of proper notices.
8 The meeting adjourned at 11;50 p.m.
Submitted by Hardy WrigLt
Secretary