The URL can be used to link to this page

09-14-2-11 ARC PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIR -PORT RELATIONS COMMISSION September 14, 2011 7:00 p.m. Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes from the August 10, 2011 Airport Relations Commission Meeting 4. Unfinished and New Business a. Appointment of new Commission Co -Chair b. NOC Meeting Update c. 2011/2012 Draft Work Plan d. Metropolitan Airports Commission Capital Improvement Pro -rain e. Commission Items of Interest 3. Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence: a. Monthly Statistical Review b. July 2011 NOC Technical Advisor's Report C. July 2011 Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis d. July 2011 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report e. July 2011 Crossing -in -the -Corridor Analysis 4. Upcoming Meetings 6 City Council Meeting NOC Meeting Planning Commission 5. Public Comments 6. Adjourn 9-20-2011 7:00 p.m. 9-21-2011 1:30 p.m. 9-27-2011 7:00 p.m. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 651-452-1850 with requests. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES August 10, 2011 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, August 10, 2011 at 7:00 p.m. at 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. The following commissioners were present: David Sloan, Robin Ehrlich, Sally Lorberbaum, Gina Norling, Jim Neuharth, Bill Dunn and Kevin Byrnes Absent: None. Also present: David McKnight, John Mazzitello and Gretchen Keenan. Approval of Minutes A motion by Commissioner Lorberbaum, seconded by Commissioner Neuharth to approve the minutes of the July 13, 2011 ARC meeting with changes. Motion passed unanimously. Introduction City Administrator David McKnight introduced Public Works Director/City Engineer John Mazzitello who will be the interim city administrator starting next week. Mr. Mazzitello shared some of his history with the group and each of the commissioners introduced themselves. Resignation Commissioner Robin Ehrlich shared that this would be his last meeting. Due to work conflicts he will not be able to attend ARC meetings held on Wednesday nights. The commissioners thanked Mr. Ehrlich for his service to the community. Mr. McKnight stated that the resignation and how to fill the vacancy will be discussed at the city council meeting next week. NOC Meeting Update Commissioner Ehrlich provided a brief review of. the July 2011 Noise Oversight Committee meeting. Vern Wilcox from Bloomington was reelected as chair. Presentations were made on a number of issues including one by the SMAAC group. 2011/2012 Work Plan Commissioners spent time review the 2009 Airport Noise Plan of Action and started to update the plan for 2012. Significant time was spent reviewing and updating the high priority action items for the plan. City staff will bring a draft of the updated plan to the September meeting for review and additional work by the commission. Once the plan is complete, it will be presented to the city council. tems of Interest Commissioner Norling reviewed charts she created tracking specific noise events and the high number associated with runway 12L in June. The commission will continue to track this item to see if it is a trend or not. Commissioner Neuharth stated he will be working with city staff on his control charts and updating the information he presented in July. Commissioner Dumi discussed the results of the sensor monitoring and how Mendota Heights compared to Minneapolis in terms of high noise events and lengths. Commissioner Lorberbaum reviewed the charts she created in terms of complainants by city and the trends that are evident. The commissioners appreciated the charts. Commissioner Byrnes discussed the articles he sent out earlier in the day related to airport noise, citizen commissions and related items. Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence a. Monthly Statistical Review b. June 2011 NOC Technical Advisors Report C. June 2011 Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis d. June 2011 Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report e. June 2011 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis Reports acknowledged. Upcoming Meetings ® MAC Meeting 8-15-2011 1:00 P.M. City Council Meeting 8-16-2011 7:00 p.m. NOC Meeting 9-21-2011 1:30 p.m. Public Comments None. Adiourn Motion by Commissioner Lorberbaum and seconded by Commissioner Dunn to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2 2 Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) Meeting Agenda September 21, 2011 1:30 P.M. Lindbergh Conference Room MAC General Offices Building 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 (User Co -Chair will be the acting Chairperson for the meeting) *Note: 1:00 to 1-30 — Committee Agenda Review Session (NOC members only in the Coleman Conference Room) 1. 1:30 to 1:40 — Nomination and Election of Airport User Co -Chair (official start of the public NOC meeting in the Lindbergh Conference Room) 2. 1:40 to 1:55 — Public Comment Period 3. 1:55 to 2:00 — Review and Approval of July 20, 2011 NOC Meeting Minutes 4. 2:05 to 2:10 — Review of Operations Report Summary 5. 2-10to2:30—N.O.I.S.E Member NOC Community Representatives Update on Activities at Other U.S. Airports Related to the Health Effects of Aircraft Noise 6. 2-30 to 2:45 — Performance -Based Navigation (PBN) Procedure Update 7. 2:45 — 3-00 — MAC Noise Program Website Redesign Update 8. 3:00 — 3:15 — Update on West Side Cargo Operations 9. 3:15 to 3:30 — Review Items for Possible Inclusion in the 2012 MSP NOC Work Plan 10.3:30 — 3:40 — Third Quarter 2011 Public Input Meeting Comments 11. 3:40 —Adjourn I' 5P Noise Oversight Committee 20 July 2011 2 2. Public Comment Period There were no public comments. 3. Review and Approval of the 18 May 2011 NOC Meeting Minutes IT WAS MOVED BY REPRESENTATIVE PETSCHEL AND SECONDED BY REPRESENTATIVE ERAZO TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE 18 MAY 2011 COMMITTEE MEETING. Because there was not a quorum present for today's meeting, approval of the 18 May 2011 meeting minutes will be held over to the 21 September 2011 Committee meeting. 4. Review of Operations Report Summary Jennifer Lewis, MAC Environment, said there were just over 7200 noise complaints for May 2011, which is a significant increase over the number of complaints for May 2010. She said there were 5909 complaints for June 2011, which is also a significant increase over the number of complaints for June 2010. She noted that lower numbers of complaints and complainants occur consistently during winter months, and that complaints generally increase in spring and summer months. Lewis noted there has been an approximate 2-3% increase in the number of aircraft operations when comparing 2011 to 2010. She said the number of air carrier operations for May and June 2011 is an approximate 4% increase over the same timeframe for 2010. She said that, for 2011 to date, regional jet operations account for about 50% of total air carrier fleet composition, while manufactured Stage 3 operations account for about 3% and other types of operations account for about 45% of the total. Lewis said there has been an approximate 20% increase in nighttime operations when comparing May 2011 to May 2010, and an approximate 34% increase when comparing June 2011 to June 2010. She noted that scheduled nighttime operations are generally not at such high levels, and she said the increase in nighttime operations is due, in part, to the weather the Twin Cities experienced this spring and early summer. She said runway closures due to airfield construction projects also played a part in the increase in nighttime operations. She said that notice of any runway closure longer than 30 minutes is posted on the MAC's website. Lewis said there were just over 4800 Runway 17 carrier jet departure operations in �- May 2011, with a 99.4% rate of compliance with the Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure I IVISP noise Oversight Committee 20 ,.lulu 2€011 3 Procedure. There were 5293 Runway 17 carrier jet departure operations in June 2011, with a 99.5% rate of compliance with the departure procedure. Lewis said that, in May 2011, 3,833 carrier jet operations departed Runways 12L and 12R and that there was a 92.2% rate of compliance with the Eagan -Mendota Heights Departure Corridor. She said that 5,062 carrier jet operations departed Runways 12L and 12R in June 2011 and that there was a 91% rate of compliance with the Departure Corridor. Lewis noted there was 54% compliance with the use of the Crossing -in -the -Corridor Procedure during the nighttime hours in May 2011, and 31% compliance during other hours. She said there was 55% compliance during the nighttime hours in June 2011, and 31% compliance during other hours. 5. Review of Residential Noise Mitigation Program Implementation Status and Homeowner Satisfaction John Nelson, MAC Noise Mitigation Program Manager, provided an update on the MAC's Residential Noise Mitigation Program. He reminded Committee members the program is implemented in different phases. He said that, in DNL 63-64, the program provides for a 5 -decibel modification package for homes. In the 60-62 DNL, homes are eligible for air-conditioning and $4,232 of mitigation, or $14,809 worth of mitigation is air-conditioning was already present. He noted that the dollar values have increased slightly due to consumer price indexing. He said that properties without air- conditioning in the 60-64 DNL received a pull-through air -conditioner; properties with air-conditioning but no covers for the air -conditioners received covers. He said that eligible homes in the 2005 60-64 DNL will split $7 million for approved mitigation reimbursement, with per -home reimbursement capped at $2,902. Nelson noted that information on the program is available at www.macnoise.com. Nelson said that, in the 5 -decibel reduction phase, there were 453 eligible homes in Bloomington, Richfield and Minneapolis. 400 homeowners participated in the program. Orientations for homeowners began in April 2008 and construction began in August 2008. All construction in this phase of the program was completed by December 2009. In this phase, the average construction cost was approximately $27,637 per home. Nelson said that, in the part A of the second phase of the program (Phase 2A), there were 1,773 eligible homes in Bloomington, Eagan, Richfield and Minneapolis. 1654 homes participated in the program. In this phase, the menu of mitigation items included primary doors, primary windows, storm windows, storm doors and attic and sidewall insulation. Orientations for homeowners in this phase began in January 2009 and were substantially completed in August 2010. Construction in this phase began in 7 WISP Noise Oversight Committee 20 July 2011 4 February 2009 and must be completed by December 2012. In this phase, the average construction cost is approximately $15,463 per home. Nelson said that, in the second part of the second phase of the program (Phase 213), 2,518 eligible homes in Bloomington, Eagan, Richfield and Minneapolis already had central air-conditioning. The number of homes in this phase grew to 3,578 due to Phase 2A homeowners deciding to opt for Phase 213 rather than having air- conditioning installed. 238 homes did not participate in this phase. Construction in this phase began in February 2010 and the construction production goal is 100+ homes per month. The last phase of this construction began in June 2011 and must be completed by December 2012. Admissions to this phase of the program will close in March 2012. In this phase, the average construction cost is approximately $13,855 per home. Nelson said approximately 2,401 homes have been identified for limited noise mitigation reimbursement in the third phase of the program. He said the most recent notice to homeowners was sent 1 July 2010. The current reimbursement allocation for homeowners is $2,902. Reimbursements began in March 2010 and will continue through June 2014. He said that reimbursements are retroactive to work done back t the date of the Consent Decree. He said that as of June 2011 there have been 835 claims totaling $2.3 million. Nelson said that, in the 60-64 DNL multi -family group, there were 2,623 eligible units in Bloomington, Eagan, Richfield and Minneapolis. 1,646 units participated in the project. Over 1,724 acoustical covers were installed in units with through -the -wall air- conditioning units; 219 through -the -wall or equivalent air-conditioning has been provided to 219 units. Construction in this phase was completed in June 2010. Nelson said that one trend that has developed in the program is homeowners opting for Phase 213 rather than Phase 2A. He said that the pace of mitigation work is robust . in June 2011, with 747 Phase 2A/26 home in pre -construction or construction. Nelson recognized Representative Quincy and his staff, Christine Costello and Pam Dmytrenko from the City of Richfield, Minneapolis City Council Member Elizabeth Glidden, and Representative Miller for their assistance in trying to increase homeowner participation in the program. He noted that non -participation occurs for several reasons, such as homes being in foreclosure or some other type of financial distress, and homes being sold and sellers not having work done while in the process of selling the home. Nelson noted that homeowners who have participated in the project are given a satisfaction survey to complete. He noted that homeowners who completed the survey (across all the phases of the program) reported: �. • 90-97% improvement in insulating aircraft noise; MSP poise Oversight Committee 20 Jul, 2011 5 • 97-100% improvement in interior home comfort 95-100% would recommend the program to their neighbor • 85-93% think their home has increased in market value due to insulation modifications • 96-100% felt consultant staff accurately described and represented their insulation modification package • 95-100% thought the consultant staff was helpful, courteous and prompt Nelson noted that improvement rates for activities such as talking on the phone, sleeping and listening to the television were lower for homeowners in phases of the program that did not receive the 5 -decibel modification package. Satisfaction rates in those phases ranged from 73-88%. Nelson noted that a response of "poor" for contractor performance will require a written response from the contractor in question as to what the problem was, and a discussion between the MAC, the consultant staff and the contractor about what occurred. He noted that 95-98% of homeowner respondents indicated satisfaction with the program's product quality and 88-97% would recommend their contractor to a neighbor. Chair Wilcox said that he has heard only positive responses from residents about the mitigation program. 6. SMAAC President, Mr. James Spensley, Presentation on Aircraft Noise Health Effect Concerns Mr. James Spensley, President - South Metro Airport Action Council (SMAAC), said that the SMAAC has been fully supportive of the MAC's timely and well done home mitigation program. Spensley said that the Final Environmental Impact Statement that was done in 1998 had a finding by the MAC, the FAA and the EPA that the home mitigation program would be better than doing nothing. He said the premise of the finding was that the environmental and health impacts from airport noise would be better if the interior noise levels on an annualized daily average basis were 45 db. He said that, in many ways, things are better than if the mitigation had not been done in terms of annoyance, acceptance of the airport and accepting inconvenience in return for economic benefits. He said that is SMAAC's position, but that it is not 1998 anymore and that the question before the MAC and the public is whether or not MSP should be expanded further. He said the question that follows is if it would be necessary to extend the noise mitigation program if MSP is expanded. He said the question is whether we know more now than in 1998 about the effects of airport noise. He said that SMAAC believes there is a large body of information that suggests something 0 WISP Noise Oversight Committee 20 July 201 6 should different should be done this time. He said that it is not clear that no action wouldn't be better than expanding the airport further, from an environmental point of view. He said SMAAC brought this up first in 2008 when some health studies were published that showed adverse public health effects from airport operations that were not correlated well with DNL levels. He said the studies did correlate with event noise. He said the suggestion is that noise abatement is more effective than any kind of treatment, including mitigation. Spensley said the next question is the applicability of the health studies to the current EA/EAW that is being processed for the 2015-2030 plans for expanding flight operations and increasing overflights over land that has had few changes with respect to compatible land use. He said there are a few areas where different land uses happened but whether that was imposed or whether it was meant to help noise is debatable. Spensley said the SMAAC attempted to comment through two channels on the EA/EAW for the long term capital plan and the specific 2015 target. He said the SMAAC asked its representatives to come to the Committee and ask if the Committee thought it should take a look at the health studies and see if that ought to modify the Committee's recommendations to the MAC regarding what the effects of the EA/EAW would be. He said that was in the fall of 2007. He said the SMAAC wrote to the Commission to comment on the EA/EAW and that one of the letters SMAAC wrote `. was referred to MAC staff. He said MAC staff suggested taking the issue to the Committee and that the Commission already has a policy that the mitigation program is adequate and that the MAC would compare the continuation of the mitigation program favorably to no action. He said the SMAAC believes premise the of the sound mitigation is an industry thing that may be helpful but that it may, or may not, be better than no expansion with respect to certain public health issues including a higher incidence of fatal heart attacks, a higher incidence of autism, a higher incidence of respiratory disease. He said that even allowing for great changes in the public health risk for respiratory disease as smoking has declined and air pollution is reduced. He said the SMAAC believes these are serious matters and that there should be caution in saying that a model which takes real data and uses that plus projected changes in operations airplanes sound —reducing procedures and other things which are not enforceable predictions,—and say things will be just as well as not expanding the airport in terms of public health impacts if we just model some things, throw in some predictions and come up with some DNL contours with enclose an area smaller than the one that's enclosed now. Spensely said he was before the Committee today to say the Committee should look at the studies. He said he has worked in the health industry and is a well-trained information engineer and statistician. He said he can do quantum mechanics and information theory and was well-trained by the National Security Agency for information theory. He said the information in the studies does / seem to indicate that, for the populations that were studied, overflight event noise increased the incidence of negative effects. He said that MAC staff asked how that 8ASPNoise Oversight Cnmmittee 20 July 2011 7 /- information applied to MSP, pointing out that the studies were foreign studies, were done with and without a UNL baseline and were done without a 40-50 year operational history such as exists at MSP. Spensley said he could not answer that question and that the epidemiological questions should be asked of an epidemiological expert. He said the World Health Organization chose the public health studies that alarmed it, primarily for two reasons. He said, for example, that the public school impact study was a longitudinal study that covers 25 years of data in Munich. He said the Swiss study has an n of over 4 million and plots the health histories ofover 4.] million people and compared how close they lived to and how often they were overflown at an airport and there's a striking increase in the incidence. He said someone would have to look at the details of the studies who knew what they were looking for to compare the populations in Switzerland and here. He said that, at MSP, there is a long history nfwhich airplanes flew where and how high and when, and that is an event noise database that is better than any of the event noise databases used in the definitive studies. He asked why not investigate whether the event noise data correlates with the health statistics data we have for this population and, knowing that, make decisions about the F4/EAW. Chair Wilcox asked,[ if in fact the studies proposed there was some kind of health impact, what Spensley sees would bethe outcome. Spensley said the MAC, the EPA, the FAA and the K4P[A would have to determine if expanding the airport and increasing rates in such a way that there is no control over where airplanes go or how many noise events there are, then should be we expand the airport or not. If it is expanded, then some kind of action is called for because of the harm and damage to the health of the public and to the public's cost of dealing with the health problems that result. Wilcox asked what actions Spensley would belooking for. Spensley said it seems to him that large and ambitious study done here in the 60-64 DNL without doing any real studies of whether the effect would be beneficial or not; a table -top analysis if the full 5clb insulation worked for 65db external noise and gave us the 45clb internal noise, then if the external noise was only 62 then, not working from guesses but working from a vast array of information in the 55-70 DNL program Mr. Nelson and others had the data to say air-conditioning would help some, windows would help some. He said he thinks someone should be found to compare the studies, the populations and the measuring of overflights and say this could be a problem and then the question would be what can be done to avoid the problem. Spenae|ysaid shutting down the airport would probably not be the answer but that it might be changing operational patterns so that aircraft more often fly down noise corridors, or slowing down the peak hour rates without reducing capacity at the airport or having gradual descents. Hesaid the SK4AACbelieves that ifthe MAC istruly concerned and had data saying that the overflights were causing a problem then it should look at operational changes. He said the airport has not been expanded but the hourly capacity at the airport has been expanded. Wilcox asked if any other airports in the USare conducting such studies. Spensley said any ofthe studies inthe MIT report are not the types of studies he similar to the analysis he suggested but are actual is K8S$PNoise Oversight Cmmmmdtee 20 July 2011 8 epidiemo studies of the populations and actual measurements of the overflights. He said there are 300+ studies in the K4/T report, the majority of them in the US. Wilcox asked if Spensley has shared that report with his Committee representative. Spensley said he has and that it is not the only such U3 review of reports and is not even the only commissioned byF|[AN but it hasn't been acted on. He said there are several studies in the U5 where people looked at health statistics and the number of overflights and decided that overflights increased the instance of fatal heart attacks. Representative Quincy, Minneapolis, said he has not had the opportunity to review all of the data and that he does not have the expertise necessary to review it in a meaningful way. Herecognized the communities have aninterest inprotecting public health. He said itis incumbent upon the Committee to acknowledge the importance of the issue. He said he does not believe the MAC, or the State of Minnesota, has the resources to do a significant study and review of the literature. He said the bigger question is how to move the topic to a national level and have local benefits realized. Hesaid that identifying gaps inknowledge isanimportant first step. Quincy suggested the Committee add the topic to its work plan. Wilcox said he hesitates to add ittothe work plan because the Committee does not have the expertise to address it, but he agreed that itisa national issue as well as a local issue and that it should betaken to the National Organization to Insure a Sound -controlled Environment (NOISE) and that he would be interested in finding out what other airports around the country are doing about the issue. Quincy recommended the Committee convene a group of ' / Committee community representatives who are also members ofNOISE to: reach out \` to the state epidemiologist, F}[AN, NOISE, PARNTER, A[RP and third -party consultants; report back tothe Committee on what has been /earned; and establish a plan for incorporating the issue into the Committee's 2012 Work Plan. He said that communicating with the MAC onactions taken would beimportant. UhonDuggan, Mendota Heights, suggested the Committee discuss the topic with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and determine the Committee's jurisdiction in the matter. He clarified that he means jurisdiction in terms of the Committee's established charge. Wilcox noted that taking the topic to NOISE vvnuN be a fact- finding mission only at this time. Spensley said the question of jurisdiction is not applicable. He said the circumstance isthat the K4A[ has a project and has published a draft F4/EAVVand solicited comments onthe F4/E4VVand refused to accept some comments and instead referred them tothe Committee and now the Committee is atternpbnQto postpone those comments until after August 4m deadline for the E8/EAVV. Wilcox stated it is not the Committee's intention to postpone anything and that the Committee needs tnhave adiscussion about its charge. Roy Fuhrrnann,MAC Environment, in relation to the EA/EAVV, stated that there is not a published document out for comment at this time, that the document is currently in the review process and that there is noAugust 4th deadline. Spensley said it is published on the MA('svvebsite. ` ' / ON K08P Noise Oversight Commn0ftee 2DJuly 2Q11 9 Quincy said itis inoportantfor the Committee to recognize its role as an advocacy group on behalf of residents and that it is important to respond to the issue in a timely manner. Representative Petsche|, Mendota Heights, said she vvnu|d like toview the Committee's attention tothe topic as an ongoing process that will take some time to digest and discuss inathoughtful way. Wilcox agreed. The next meeting of the NOC is scheduled for Wednesday, 21 September 2011. The meeting was adjourned at 2:51pm. Respectfully Submitted, [hhsteneSirois Kron, Recording Secretary 612.725.6455 13 / ��B��b��0B�� ITEM \ ��Q��~��q�J��"��y§�NH��Q TO: [NSP Noise Oversight Committee /N0C\ FROM: Chad E.Laqve.Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: K/'OJ.S.E MEMBER N[XC COMMUNITY 0EPRESENAT|VES UPDATE ONACTIVITIES AJOTHER D.S'A|RPOTSRELATED TO THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF AIRCRAFT NOISE []ATE: September 7.2011 At the July 20. 2011 NOC meeting Mr. Jim Spensley, President of the South Metro Airport Action Council /GK4AAC\, addressed the Committee regarding possible health effects related to aircraft noise. In response to Mr. 8pens|ey`s comments, N0C Representative John Quincy and Co -Chair Vern Wilcox agreed to contact the National Organization to Ensure a Sound -Controlled Environment (N.0.|.S.E.) to gather information on what efforts are underway at other U.S. airports on this topic. It was agreed that they would report back to the Committee with their findings to determine e possible path forward for the NOC on this issue. At the September 21.011NOCmeeting Representative Quincy and Co -Chair Wilcox will update toCommittee mntheir progress. 14 MEMORANDUM ITEM 6 TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: PERFORMANCE-BASED NAVIGATION (PBN) PROCEDURE UPDATE []ATE: September 7.2O11 The Performance -Based Navigation (PBK) procedure design and implementation process is well underway and progressing well at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP). (nadd�innto increases inoperational efficiency, noise reduction remains one nft' e goals of this important effort. To that end. the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is incorporating the NOC's procedure design noise criteria in the procedure design and review process. Currently, the FAA is working through establishing procedure criteriacriteriathat meet the operational needs of all airlines that will be using the procedures in the future. It is anticipated that after conclusion of this effort draft procedure tracks will be available for the Committee's review at the November 10, 2011 NOC meeting. Shortly thereafter the environmental review process for procedure implementation will begin. At the September 21, 2011 NOC meeting staff will provide an update on this topic. 15 ITEM 7 MEMORANDUM ��l��~��Q��vQ�� TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E.Leove.Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: MAC NOISE PROGRAM WEBSITE REDESIGN UPDATE DATE: September 7, 2011 One of the Kens included on the 2011 NOC Work Plan was the redesign and enhancement ofthe MAC Noise Program Website . MAC staff has retained the services of August Aoh, a website design firm, to help with this project. Design efforts are uhdemvuy, including new application interfaces and functionality on the site. At the September 21, 2011 NOC meeting staff will detail the new enhancements/functionality that will be included in the new website. The complete site redesign will be completed before the November 16, 2811 NDC meeting. Staff will provide e live demonstration of the new site at the November NDC nneeiing, after which the site will Qo,|iveto the general public. W. MEMORANDUM ITEM 8 TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E.Leqve.Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: UPDATE ON WEST SIDE CARGO OPERATIONS []ATE: September 7.2U11 Per request by the City of Richfield, on update on west side cargo operations was included on the 2011 NDC Work Plan. The following provides background on this topic and recent statistics. Background At the May 16, 2007 NOC meeting the Committee initiated discussion regarding the City of Richfield's concerns over noise on the west side of Minneapolis -St. Paul international Airport (MSP). As part of this discussion, the topic of ramp operations on the west side of F{unvvuy 17/35 was raised as a possible issue that residents in Richfield perceive as a noise impact in their community. 8pedhcaUy, discussion focused on the daily cargo operations occurring on the west side cargo ramp and the associated ramp operations, including engine start practices. /nconsideration of the communities' concerns, DHL expressed adesire to confirm that its present engine start operations are not a noise problem and to verify that it is using a good operation standard to move forward with inthe future from a noise perspective. Specifically, Jim Ahwe|/, DHL Area W1onager, stated that DHL had been using an engine start procedure for its Stage 3 hushhitted aircraft that it felt posed the least amount of noise impact to the communities. As part of the prnooduna. Stage 3 hunhhittad aircraft are towed to the east edge of the ramp with the aircraft on centerline (nose pointing east) of the ramp arterial to taxiway Lima prior to engine start. The graphic depicts the procedure. On June 19, 2007 MAC staff conducted noise monitoring of ramp operations on the west side cargo ramp Tmm approximately 6:20 am to in conclusion, the noise monitoring established that the practice of . tugging Stage 3 hushkhƒed aircraft to the non -AOA nide of the cargo ramp peripheral ho taxiway Lima and then starting the aircraft engines with the aircraft 17 pointed east produces no measurable noise impacts west ofCedar Avenue in Richfield. At the time, the only aircraft that was not being hugged before engine start was o Kitty ` Hawk B737 aircraft. Hovvever, as was determined from the noise ona|ysis, there was no measurable noise impact in the City ofRichfield from the operation starting and taxing out of the vveoL side cargo area. As such, it was recommended that Stage 3 huohkit engine starts be conducted, as a standard practice, consistent with the operation detailed above. At the July 18, 2007 NOC meeting the Committee endorsed use of this procedure. Shortly thereafter, the MAC established a Letter ofAgreement (LOA)with the tenants outlining the use nfthe engine start procedure. West Side Operations Update Since the enactment of the engine start procedure on the west side cargo ramp a number of trends have emerged that have dramatically impacted the nature of operations onthe west side. As is detailed in the charts below, weekly departure operations on the west side cargo ramp have decreased by over 5096 from 2007 to 2011 and as ofSeptember 2. 2011 nighttime (2230-0608) operations no longer occur on the ramp. Moreover, Stage 3 hushkitted aircraft no longer operate to and from the ramp area while propeller driven aircraft are now operating onthe west side. West Side Cargo Ramp Weekly Departures [approximate schedule after 9/2/11) 21 20 0 10 02007 10 M 2009 B727 B737 DC8 C402 Metro West Side Cargo Ramp Weekly Departures (approximate schedule after 9/2/11) ]et Prop O*i edioos '------- --- -------' -- -- -- —'- —'-- ---- The above trends represent significant change in the nature and possible noise impact ofwest side cargo operations atMSP. CorxaopondinO|y, as in indicated be|ovv, ground noise complaints in east Richfield have dropped significantly from 2007 to 2011. Richfield Ground Noise Complaints (Ist 5 months of the year) 50 m 2009 25 -12011 Total Complaints Complainants At the September 21, 2011 NOC meeting staff will provide a briefing on this topic. ITEM 9 MEMORANDUM ��8��U�^��Qn�Q~�V�Q�� ` TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: REVIEW ITEMS FOR POSSIBLE INCLUSION |NTHE 2O12 MSP NOC WORK PLAN DA] -E: September 7.2011 At the September 21, 2011 NOC meetng discussions will begin regarding possible elements of the 2012 NOC Work Plan. Final member comments and ideas will be sought atthe November 1S.2U11 NOC meeting inaneffort tofinalize the 2O12NOC Work Plan. MAC staff provides the following for consideration aspossible 2U12NOC efforts: Residential Noise Mitigation Program 0 Review Residential Noise Mitigation Program Implementation Status MSP Noise Program Specific Efforts , 2U11Actual Noise Contour Report ^ Review VVisparTnsokWeb-Based Technology for Possible |nnp(mnnmntodon at ( MSP - ° Annual Scheduled Nighttime Operations Assessment ° MSP Performance -Base Navigation (PBN) Procedure /nnp|onnentetinn Environmental Analysis ° Development ofMonthly Reports toAssess Future PBNOperations mtMSP ^ Finalization of Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) 2020 Environmental Assessment (E/\) Noise Analysis ~ Review ofAircraft Fleet -mix Trends at K4GP " Nighttime Runway Use Analysis ° Review Status of FAA Center of ExceUenoe/PARTNER. TRB and F/CAN Initiatives Continued Review ofPublic Input " Continue to Review Input Received from the Public Input Meetings as Possible Agenda Items Please consider the above efforts in preparation for u preliminary 2011 NOC Work Plan discussion otthe September 21.2U11 NOC meeting. Final discussion and consideration ofwork plan elements will occur atthe November 18.2O11 NOC meeting when the 2O12 NOC Work Plan is finalized. a ITEM MEMORANDUM I TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Noise, Environment and Planning SUBJECT: THIRD QUARTER 2011 PUBLIC INPUT MEETING COMMENTS DATE: September 7, 2011 One of the elements of the Metropolitan Airports Commission's (MAC) approved framework for the k88P Airport Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) requires MAC staff to conduct quarterly public input meetings. The intent is to ensure residents' concerns are considered as pad of the ongoing effort by the MAC and the N(}C to address noise issues around MSP. This memorandum provides o summary ofthe comments received at the most recent public input meeting. The NDC may also review these topics an possible future action items ifthe members sodesire. On July 28. 2011 MAC Aviation Noise and Satellite Program staff conducted the third quarter public input meeting; four people attended the meeting and one individual made comments. MAC staff responded to questions at the meeting and is also providing ovvritten response to the questions. The ronnnnantn and associated responses can be found on the MAC Noise Program's website uco*ooiblm on the Internet at when they are completed. in sunnn)ary, questions related to future airport expansion` airline agreements, Area Navigation (RNAV) and emissions. Specific questions were raised regarding the MSP 202Expansion Environmental Assessment /EA\ open houses and whether Delta has assumed all contractual obligations with the MAC formerly held by Northwest Airlines. Questions regarding RNAV technology in genera[ other locations in the country where RNAV is being used, and the timeline for implementation of RNAV at MSP were raised. Additionally, questions were raised regarding efforts at the airport to address emissions, and the characteristics of aircraft particulate emissions compared to other emission The next quarterly public input meeting is planned for October 25, 2011. 61 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEMO DATE: September 14, 2011 TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: John R. Mazzitello, PE, PM Public Works Director/City 4E* r/Interim City Administrator SUBJECT: 2012 Airport Relations Commission Airport Noise Plan of Action/Work Plan Discussion The 2009 ARC Work Plan is included with this memo for your review. Revisions, as directed by the ARC at their August, 2011 meeting have been incorporated into the Draft Work Plan attached. Formatting and other non -content related issues can be addressed by City Staff outside the meeting agenda, so my suggestion to the ARC is to review and comment on the content of the Work Plan. Recommendation Review the Draft Work Plan and provide staff with additional feedback and suggested revisions. A revised Draft Work Plan will be presented and discussed at the October ARC meeting. Action Required Provide staff with comments on the Work Plan along with suggested revisions. 22 2012 Airport Noisv Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Mendota Heights City Code (2-4-6) establishes the following powers and duties for the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission: A. The Airport Relations Commission shall advise the city council on matters pertaining to airport noise and operations at Mirmeapolis - St. Paul international airport. B. The Airport Relations Commission is expected to monitor proposed rules, procedures and programs which impact the air noise situation within the city and to make recommendations to the city council regarding strategies to mitigate the city's air noise exposure. C. The Airport Relations Commission shall have such other duties and powers as granted by the City Council from time to time. (Ord. 290, 4-20-1993) In an effort to mitigate airport noise in the Mendota Heights community and assure equity of the current runway use system, the Commission has given high priority to the following issues: - 1 - 9/2011 23 High Priority Issues 1. Participate in noise studies. 2. Develop and strengthen our partnerships with MAC, the FAA, legislative leaders and other govermnent bodies regarding airport issues. 3. Monitor airport operations to ensure equitable use of runways. 4. Participate in efforts to keep planes in the designated air corridor over Mendota Heights. 5. Maintain active membership in, and provide input and dialog with the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC). 6. Monitor test of RNAV procedures and encourage implementation of RNAV procedures off 12L and 12R. 7. Monitor residential land use in Mendota Heights, particularly developable parcels that may be affected by airport noise. 8. Monitor nighttime restrictions on aircraft operations. 9. Observe ongoing changes in fleet mix. 10. Provide oversight of 2030 Plan. 11. Provide communications to City Council and residents regarding airport issues, and inform the City Council of pertinent issues. 12. Heighten awareness and communication of Mendota Heights noise and operational concerns. B. Monitor correspondence and new information on national and international noise mitigation efforts. Monitor national and international airport issues, particularly as they relate to noise. Additional Issues o Send a city representative to NOISE conference as City budget allows. - 2 - 9/2011 24 Issue #1: Participate in noise studies Action Steps. Who: When: 1. Review and provide input to the MAC when noise studies ARC/Staff Continuous are completed. Issue #2: Develop and strengthen our partnerships with MAC, the FAA, legislative leaders and other government bodies regarding airport issues. Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Invite State Senator and Representative to a regular ARC ARC/Staff Annually meeting. 2. Invite FAA Tower Operator to a regular ARC meeting. ARC/Staff Annually 3. Invite our MAC Commissioner to a regular ARC meeting. ARC/Staff Annually Issue #3: Monitor airport operations to ensure equitable use of runways. Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Monitor departure operations. ARC/Staff As available 2. Communicate inequality of runway use. ARC/Staff Monthly 3. Communicate reaction to the analysis of 17-35 completion. ARC/Staff As available 4. Review tower operations with MAC staff for 17-35 effects. ARC/Staff As available 5. Monitor MAC/FAA accommodations to communities ARC/Staff As appropriate affected by 17/35 operations for consistency with treatment of Mendota Heights and adherence to EIS. Issue 94: Participate in efforts to keep planes in the designated air corridor over Mendota Heights. Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Monitor flight data trends to ensure adherence to the ARC/Staff Monthly corridor. -3 - 9/2011 25 Issue #S: Maintain active membership in, and provide input and dialog with the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC). Action Steps• Who: When: 1. Monitor activities and processes of MSP Noise Oversight Committee. 2. Conduct regular meetings with NOC representatives and ARC to identify issues that can be advocated. 3. Work collaboratively with other communities on mutual concerns as regards to airport development and operations. ARC/Staff Monthly ARC/NOC As needed ARC/Staff As needed Issue H6: Monitor test of RNAV procedures and encourage implementation of RNAV procedures off 12L and 12R. Action Steps• Who: When• 1. Monitor RNAV procedure results from runways 12L and 12R 2. Involve elected representatives in RNAV adoption. 3. Promote standard instrument departures and final approaches through the use of global positioning satellites to keep planes in the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor. 4. Monitor the use of Continuous Decent Approach ARC/Staff As appropriate ARC/Staff As appropriate ARC/Staff As appropriate Issue #7: Monitor residential land use in Mendota Heights, particularly developable parcels that may be affected by airport noise. Action Steps• Who: When: 1. Monitor applications for development and redevelopment ARC/Staff in airport noise impacted areas. 2. Provide recommendations to the City Council for ARC/Staff development rezoning and/or acquisition of these sites. 3. Review all planning application materials submitted within ARC/Staff airport noise impact zones. Issue #8: Monitor nighttime restrictions on aircraft operations As apps are filed As apps are fi led As apps are filed - 4 - 9/2011 26 Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Have NOC representative lobby for further restrictions on ARC/NOC Ongoing nighttime operations (preferred nighttime headings). 2. Monitor legal precedent/]itigation concerning noise level ARC Continuous averaging. 3. Monitor night departure trends. ARC/Staff Monthly Issue #9: Observe ongoing changes in fleet mix. Action Stens: Who: When: 1. Monitor NOC updates on fleet mix ARC/Staff Ongoing 2. Advocate for conversion from hush kitted to Manufactured Stage III and Stage IV aircraft. ARC/Staff Ongoing Issue #10: Provide oversight of 2030 Plan. Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Identify effects of 2030 Plan on Mendota Heights. 2. Work proactively with other Cities to require MAC to address and minimize adverse effects of implementing 2030 Plan. 3. Work to require MAC's expanded use of reliever airports. ARC/Staff Ongoing ARC/Staff Ongoing ARC/Staff Ongoing Issue #11: Provide communications to. City Council and residents regarding airport issues, and inform City Council of pertinent issues. Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Provide annual. report in Heights Highlights. ARC/Staff 2. Develop means for more direct feedback from citizens ARC/Staff 3. Post link to MAC Noise website with our agendas/minutes Staff 4. Televise ARC meetings as agenda content dictates. Staff 5. Maintain list of meetings pertaining to the airport. Staff Annual Ongoing Ongoing As appropriate Ongoing - 5 - 9/2011 27 Issue #12: Heighten awareness and communication of Mendota Heights noise and operational concerns Action Steps: Who: When: Issue #13: Monitor correspondence and new information on national and international noise mitigation efforts. Monitor national and international airport issues, particularly as they relate to noise. Action Steps: Who: When: -6- 9/2011 28 August 31, 2011 Page 2 that pertain to the CIP. You will receive mailings regarding the CIP review and approval process. Once the Commission approves the preliminary CIP, you will have 60 days to provide comments on the proposed CIP to the MAC. MAC staff will be available to attend any public meetings to answer questions regarding the projects in the CIP. All comments regarding the CIP must come from the "affected municipality" and not from individuals. The Planning, Development, and Environment Committee of the Commission will be meeting on September 6, 2011 to review and make a recommendation to the full Commission on a Preliminary 2012 CIP. The approval of the Preliminary CIP will start the mandated environmental review process. Enclosed is the agenda for the Committee meeting, the Staff memo on the CIP, a spreadsheet showing the proposed 2012-2018 CIP, and project narratives for years 2012 and 2013. All comments and questions on either the process or the CIP should be addressed to: Robert Vorpahl, Senior Project Manager/Program Development Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 -28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 Phone- 612.726.8127 Email: bob.vorp@hl657mspmac.Qrq Sincer Robert J. Vorpahl, P.E. Senior Project Manager/Program Development Enclosures RJV/Irk cc: Dennis Probst, MAC Gary Warren, MAC PD&E packet file CIP file we SEE ATTACHED INFORMATION REGARDING SECURITY CHECKPOINT INFORMATION PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND. ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Paul Rehkamp, Chair Pat Harris, Vice Chair Carl Crimmins Greg Foster Don Monaco Dan Boivin, Commission Chair Tim Geisler, F & A Chair Mike Landy, M & 0 Chair METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE Tuesday, September 6, 2011, 11=00 a -m. Room 3048A, Terminal I -Lindbergh Minneapolis -St- Paul International Airport OPEN FORAM The Open Forum is a portion of the Committee meeting where persons will be allowed to address the Committee on subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. Speakers are asked to limit their remarks to two minutes each. Persons wishing to speak must complete a sign-up card prior to the start of the meeting. The sign-up card should be given to any staff person. The Committee may take action or reply at the time of the statement or may give direction to staff at the end of the meeting regarding investigation of the concerns expressed. CONSENT REPORTS a. Change Management Policy and Project Status Report Dennis Probst, Deputy Executive Director— Planning and Environment 2. FINAL PAYMENTS —.MAC CONTRACTS a. 2010 Miscellaneous Construction b. Terminal 2 -Humphrey Passenger Boarding Bridge Replacement C. 2010 Parking Structure Rehabilitation — Phase 2 Gary G. Warren, Director of Airport Development 3. BIDS RECEIVED — MAC CONTRACTS a. Terminal 2 -Humphrey Curbside Canopy/Monument Repair— Phase I b. 2011 FAA Building Tenant Improvements - Storm Sewer Repair Gary G. Warren, Director of Air -port Development 31 3. Capital Improvement Plan - This encompasses the last five years of the total program and consists of projects that appear likely to be needed during the period. This portion of the program assists in financial planning and meets the requirements of the Metropolitan Council's Investment Framework_ Staff will be requesting authority to study and prepare costs to help in analyzing the need and benefit of these future projects. Also included with this memo (Attachment 2) are the following: Listing of projects. " • Cost totals for each category. Project narratives for years 2012 and 2013, 'The 2010 Long Term Comprehensive Plan is complete with the exception of the Noise Mitigation Program. New projects have been listed in the "Post 2010 Program" under financial sub -ledger headings. It is necessary for the Commission to adopt the "preliminary- CIP for purposes of initiating the environmental review and to allow sufficient time for the "affected municipalities' to review the CIP, The attached project listing includes projects that are primarily focused on the rehabilitation and replacement of airport pavements or terminal infrastructure to ensure that airport safety, security and operations are not compromised. MAC Finance is in the process of determining the funding limits for the 2012-2014 portion of the proposed CIP. The proposed GIP will likely see further reductions pending the result of Finance's review which will be reflected in the version. to be distributed for the November 7, 2011 Public Hearing. COMMITTEE ACTION REQUESTED RECOMMEND TO THE FULL COMMISSION ACCEPTANCE OF THE ATTACHED PRELIMINARY 2012-2018 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR PURPOSES OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. FURTHER, THAT STAFF BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS AND THAT THE PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE BE DESIGNATED HEARING OFFICERS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD AT THE NOVEMBER PLANNING, DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING. 34 20 ,412 — 210118 capita l diip�i�vQ'�-;�;�tr;f Pr gram Development Schedule p8%25/11 ATTACHMENT 1 35 RE$PONSIRILir(T�. SCHEBULE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Initial Capital Improvement Program (GIP) Discussions Airport Development January 1 Requests for CIP Projects to Airport Development MAC Departments January 1— May 1 Develop Project Scopes, Costs, and Prioritization MAC Departments/Airport February 1 — July 31 Development/Consultants Preliminary Target Funding Sources/Amounts Airport Development/ February 1 Finance Departments Develop Draft Preliminary CIP Airport Development/ February 1 — July 31 Finance Departments Prepare Assessments of Environmental Effects Environment July 31 - October 10 (AOEEs) and Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAWs) as required Notice of September Planning, Development, and Airport Development August 29 Environment (PD&E) Committee Meeting mailed -to Affected Municipalities Recommendation by PD&E Committee to Commission Airport Development September 8 of Preliminary CIP for Environmental (review/Authorization to Hold Public Hearing on AOEEs and EAWs Minutes of September PD&E Committee Meeting and Airport Development September 15 Notice of, September Commission Meeting mailed to Affected Municipalities Approval of Preliminary C)P by Commission for Airport Development September 19 Environmental Review/Authorization to hold Public Nearing on AOEEs and 'EAWs Preliminary CIP mailed to.Affected Municipalities Airport Development September 20 AOEEs and EAWs to Environmental Quality Board Environment October 10 (EQB) Public Hearing Notice Published in EQB Monitor, which Environment October 17 starts the 30- day comment period. Minutes of September Commission Meeting mailed to Airport Development Qctober 18 Affected Municipalities Public Hearing on AOEEs and EAWs at November Environment November 7 PD&E Committee Meeting p8%25/11 ATTACHMENT 1 35 Thirty -day comment period on AOEEs and EAWs Ends Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)- Aviation Task Force Final Date for Affected Municipalities Comments on Preliminary CIP to MAC Technical Advisory Committee Notice of December PD&E Committee Meeting mailed to Affected Communities. Recommendation by PD&E Committee to Commission of Final CIP Minutes of December PD&E Committee Meeting and Notice of December Commission Meeting mailed to Affected Municipalities Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)- Policy Committee Transportation Advisory Board Approval of -Final CIP by Commission. Notification of Commission action to EQB CIP distributed to MAC Departments, Met Council, and Affected Municipalities Metropolitan Council -Transportation Committee Metropolitan Council Minutes of December Commission Meeting mailed to Affected Communities NOTE: 08/25/11 36 Environment November 16 Metropolitan Council TBD Affected Communities I November 21 Metropolitan Council December 7 Airport Development December 1 Airport Development/ December 5 Finance Departments Airport Development December 14 Metropolitan Council December 21 Metropolitan Council December 21 Airport Development December 19 Airport Development December 23 Airport Development' December 23 Metropolitan Council January 9, 2012 Metropolitan Council January 11, 2012 Airport Development January 24, 2012 • All dates are tentative and subject to change • Shaded Items represent actions/dates which pertain to the Affected Municipalities as defined in Minnesota Statutes §473.621, Subd. 6 as amended CLO p ECL I NN C5 888 §§ct Izi Ci M CZ! I-: c6 I ATTACHMENT 2 37 aGl Is O c O fn 16 e L 2 E Fli 15 CL In 12- E :'s o a in 14 J w -a W Q E c O fn 16 e L 2 E Fli 15 CL In 12- E :'s o a in (9 w -a W Q E 22 C) E CL 8T2 a 0-0 CL W- w co d) ca co 0 CL 0 0-, cr ui we 8 !"1 DL %, g g"'. - ,Y AM j2 Aq E E ' o , 8 � g a a 0 Co 0 W co OE 9:2 t 00 .05-e> 0 A Fl cW Clad 0 w a- w co ca a_ co m a- LU 8 R 53 a I Ct Ci C11 O 44 Y?44 "NERS 04 ci Ct al 4"',01 09, aof 44 t, t, vv;p Xx NO o CL '.kg, Ci ctfr'i Rt ., 4, AM 40myl l� NAxi tgl - VAYxw Fli Q ith 'I' C) LN MO. 1.0 0 BE 8 o o C; �T U7 S2 a CL a gq ul mg� (b :L > .......... U - 8L wxy E�Qa IS E z p cc V= CC U5 7E 0 cx 5m m m 4 0, a- of co CL Lu (n w cn 43 E W CL > a P:. — m E2 I 11 R E No U3 RE mr- 93. E E rL tu O K4 EL E CL E F*5 Ci 0o tii t: w CN "P E 0 Lu F .0 C,ry Ci N 04 F*5 9 I m I I W t: w CN "P E 0 Lu F .0 C,ry N 04 3 -.2) < a CIL 9 I m I I 2012 Capital Improvement Program Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport August 29, 2011 2010 Development Program Noise Mitigation Program Noise Mitigation Settlement This project is a continuation of the implementation of the noise i Exposure Map contained in the court ordered Consent Decree, I] administrative costs associated with noise mitigation in the 2007 will be expended over two years, 2011 and 2012 and will' ode Mitigation Menu category (Phase 213). In addition, home Ndil mitigation work in the 2005 60-64 DNI_ contours (Phas rhe in Post 2010 Program Proiects 08/29/11 46 10 —Terminal 1- Lindbergh Safes,tyj$ecurity Projects MAC staff, in concert with the Transpc developed a plan for the installation of a Phase 1 (West CBIS) provides 100 bags. Phase I also included Explos the north ticket lobby of Ti -Lindbergh 2007 and satisfied the initial TSA Q. Phase 2 (The Old Bus Stop) placed in service following tU grant from the TSA for rei project- Phase 2 replac �,,j c being constructer) el housed this facilityill b CB15 all for b 9 b Adm $3,600,000 program based on the Noise p struction and burs. The project funds on for homes in the $14,000 L '0.,V1,Lapproved noise $18,000,000 §,,P,,) and the airlines, has of aYRV`61ta Air Line passengers' equipment which was installed in 'A system was operational in August . 76ing of all T-1 baggage. mjrm d replaces the semi -automated GBIS AV and structlWE" of ep, in March of 2010, MAC received a project costs of this $33-5 million 560 i -throughput CTX 9800 devices, and is se G FIS po e temporary bus -stop building which as part of the plan. All T-:1 ticket counters will feed both c ted in the bag room. This project is currently under . tu ary 2013, Z. db final T ergh -- T and will transition all EDS installations at T1 ly automate IS system' at will meet all current TSA guidelines. TSA will funding for 90 igible project costs. NIffiffibarnunications RoorT ' ment Continuity and Security $2,300,000 ork (MACNet) credit card data from the Landside Parking Revenue Control Sy Jit card ind s created security standards which merchants, like the MAC, are requirrote older data. Among these requirements are security standards for the physical et equipment is located. Additionally the network equipment itself must have added' o prevent unauthorized network access. This program will address these standards g security equipment and relevant network hardware for the 150 telecommunications s on the MAC campus. This program is being coordinated with related projects including . fiber upgrade the Data Center projects to avoid duplication of effort and cost - This will be a multi-year program - Fall Protection Program $100,000 The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires that employers protect their employees that work on roof tops, next to roof edges, and other locations where there could be the potential for injuries due to falls. Options range from warning signage and spotters to guardrail and tie off systems. A Roof Fall Protection Committee has been formed that is reviewing roof areas around the MSP campus to determine potential hazards and mitigation options. This program Is being implemented to address roof fall protection in those areas deemed topresent ooimminent`hazard to project - Facilities Rehabilitation Skyway RVA.0 $1,600J)OO The skyways from Terminal I -Lindbergh that connect tothe parking structures utilize 24individual units for heating and rooUmgthe skyways- These HVAC units have been failing over the years and repair parts have been increasingly difficult to find. This project would replace the units with a new HVAC system. The north skyway was completed in 2011 and this year's projecf will provide a new HVAC system mnthe south skyway. a� Electrical Infrastructure RehablIltatlon Program There are fifty-three electrical substations that serve 01� imperative that these substations be inspected, cle continued performance. This is a continuation of Terminal Miscellaneous Modifications Each year, there is a list of "maintenance" projecWl maintenance staff to accomplish. These projects ard contracts or as purchase orders. The list of potential, 2012. Summarized below are the categories of the Miscellaneous Modifications program: � Building Exterior Rehabilitation A continuation of the program to r, including roof and curtain wall reh, Aoongoing program to the existing systems or An ongoing program to the exisW)RTMtm,.,- U�W, inals and other MAC buildings alsdue ioage and deterioration of issues inthe terminals due <oage and deterioration of /ary fbrimproved reliability. Ping pro andre within the terminals to keep abreast with ling requiremQ ay be acc mplished through a series of small individual projects to the requirements (ious tenants or may be consolidated into a single project. program to rn remodel areas within other facilities around the MSP Campus to ds of t e v nants/general public/MAC departments utilizing the facilities. have been defined for each of these five categories and the highest pri hin any of these project categories included in the program. Emergency Po- r Oades $2,200,000 Studies and surveys of -the Terminal 1 -Lindbergh transfer switches and emergency fighting were completed in 2008- This year's project will continue the design and implementation of emergency power and lighting corrective work that has been identified for upgrading. $%,0DO,000 all restrooms in Terminal 1 -Lindbergh was completed in 2010 and a program developed � upgrade/modernize study od�rn��th�reob�omomotTamoino|1-Lindber�h From each r�troomwas ( / /uu,*m ' ' '-�'~ UzeduahoUmoondU(on' This program would pro�defor the phased modero�odonofthe ' restrooms to include upgraded finishes, lighting, resource and energy saving upgrades, and ADA compliance. 08/%y/ll 2 47 -08/29/11 M Air Handling_ Unit Replacement $2,100,000 There are existing air handling units serving Terminal 1 -Lindbergh that were installed with the original terminal construction and are over 40 years old. A study of these units has been completed that evaluated each unit's age, condition, and its ability to adequately heat or cool the spaces it serves. A multi-year program to provide for the replacement of the units that have been identified as needing replacement will be implemented. The estimated project costs include modifications to building walls to facilitate the removal of existing equipment and installation of the new units, upgraded electrical and temperature controls, and asbestos abatement where required. Conveyance System Upgrades $2,700,000 A study of the MSP campus conveyance systems including elp,�, tors, gs,aators, moving walks. dumbwaiters, and material lifts was completed by the Faci a I s conveyance consultant. The study evaluated the useful life of each system incl ing t4,.. I of replacement parts and technical support of the equipment. Many ofthe sy. re beyj� jd by outdated technology that is generally less efficient than modem control %.1 ant.irt.J`., : x:, tams do nat include safety devices or features that are common]inst will therefore be implemented to "modernize and'M, Folded Plate Drain and Roof Repair The Terminal 1 -Lindbergh folded plate roof%that was I `11"`O-'..� ire ailowinq water to t weight concr structure4.1 Q;;�4 1 W constructed in 1968-60. Existing faulty roof drains, dra penetrate the concrete resulting in structural deterioration, c and water leakage into it the building at multiple locations. A pilot proje dif p i drain a t a n e eMM'Mree -year program was location was completed in 2010. Based on be pilot P�qg V. or Implemented starting in 2011 to modify ro �W., ins at 3, Vons. In addition, catwalk 4 if, access and stairs, lightning protection, f;q ting a_ 1[ leak and heat detection will be installed. MR Plumbing Infrastructure Uparad oPro $500,000 1. In 2010, MAC staff prepared a ar)Tstud retia '.sand aintain ability of the existing It. 4 4 ;, -Lindbargh plumbing infrastructure. Portio e existing ructure serving Terminal I are over 40 years old, have that are undo`:" ay's demands, contain isolation valves that are either inaccessible., ger function, a aging water meter systems. There are also deteriorated section g sanitary and storm water systems. A four year program will be implemented in 2012 to dumbing infrastructure system to meet current code requiremstam ar Ad I Itation $14,400,000 'd2 lap , . T remo e ram that will upgrade existing baggage claim devices, in! es, lightinn nditions, o ice and left baggage storage modifications, and fire er and notification/v" uation systems to meet MAC standards and code requirements. ,of the existing baggagedevices are original to the terminal construction and present less space utilizati b5hent esentation length for current and projected growth. The project ordinated with et lobby remodel multi-year project that may include additional Food C04A $100,000 The main fa )N. Kdbergh was renovated in 200612006 and incorporated the installation of wooden counters`?(: ent to this installation, the remaining food courts in T-1 have been renovated utilizing a ineered quartz product. This product has proven to be much more durable and easier to clean than the wood counters. This project will provide for the installation of new engineered quartz counters including required structural supports. Terminal Curtainwall Repair $100,000 The rubber gaskets that are integral to sealing the existing curtainwall system from air infiltration heating and cooling loss and water intrusion have been failing and require replacement in many locations. The gasket failures result in increased heating and cooling costs and repair costs resulting from water damage to the building wall assembly. This multi year program will provide for the replacement of failing gaskets and related repairs to the curtainwall system. Passenger Amenities Art in the Terminal $250,000 This project presents an opportunity to partner with the Airport Foundation to provide a gallery -type space on Concourse C for the display of permanent and temporary/rotating art exhibits. This project also includes lighting and finish upgrades in the baggage claim area to support art installations. The Concourse C location was identified as an art location with the adoption of the Public Art standards in 1999. This project will be the second phase in a program that began in 2011. Concessions Revenue Development/Uporades $200,000 This project will fund miscellaneous upgrades (finishes, furniture, condiment stations, etc.), signage brri!3 T and/or modified connections to utilities for the concession pro—h— at lerminal 1 -Lindbergh. Way-Findina Sinngoe Improvements $200000 With the change in terminal designation from Lindbq I I -Lindbergh. there is a 5in addio need to modify additional interior and exterior sign, a need to add LRT mod verhead signage to improve access/visibility to the p 1,1141 �1'140) 2t, illuminated and non -illuminated signage to Operational Improvements ' Open Architocture Building Automation (OAB 4 $1,8 00 This program will upgrade all MAC building autornatiol nMark open protocol so that the airport can bid maintenance and construction contracts mo gply. This project will replace Siemens controllers and Legacy Hone 4�1 1, tr 11 rs yrypritrollers from V Honeywell, Circon, Distech, or TAC systemMark r-Ufi F duct lines. This is a " hi'llil -year program continuation of a multiF:riI IS Data Center Facilities $15,000,000 MAC is currently supporting one hundr en' ed as data centers located throughout the MSP campus. Mo- f the 0om tions closets designed to hold these s containsrack mounted IT equipment telephone cabling and terminatio • ment. E that serves various functions in irport sec' erations (parking operations), credit fety systems (fire alarm). Many of these card processing, accounting, eswul U -'E rooms are running out of p ooling capacity. f the rooms do not have emergency power, redundant cowoling, res; or environmental monitoring. Maintenance and construction work regularly requires power which also shut down IT systems in these rooms. In addition, the "hub ^ r yrs ifiguratid.. bling among the various IT locations has created a single figuration . . . . . . . . . . p int• t all ly. A s I-ompleff at recom that the majority of the 125 rooms used as data centers lidated into on riter. Thi facility as well as four hub rooms will be connected using network dual fiber nit ration that will enhance system reliability. The dual ring upgrade -enter programmed for 2012. don of the now data began in 2011 With th I . center {' able InfraS#ruG r-ade/E-wnAnqinn $1,650,000 basic vehicle that allows for broader use of both new and existing sed technologies. The cable infrastructure requires ongoing upgrade, . ri is project will provide for the expansion of cabling infrastructure including replacing mat ° eet current MAC standards and adding capacity between locations where existing capacity sed up. Wireless Network Confrol Sy.tem $850,000 This project will provide a campus wide wireless network to be implemented over a two year period. This system would allow remote wireless access to and manipulation of the MAC Facilities Intelligent Monitoring and Control System (IMACS). The system would allow access to data and drawings from the MAC network -from the terminals as well as from vehicles on the airfield. Concourse G Improvements Concourse G Fire Protection System $7,400,000 As required by the MAC Building Official and Fire Marshal, this project will install and upgrade existing fire suppression and visual and auditory notification systems on Concourse G to meet current code 08/29/11 4 49 (including voice evacuation), and including additional exit and security signage, and new exit doors with windows. Northwest Airlines, now Delta Air Lines, had been requested to complete these upgrades in previous years. Delta Air Lines has indicated that they would like to have the MAC undertake this project with reimbursement to be made to the MAC in accordance with the agreements to be in place as part of the Delta Air Lines OTG concessions upgrade project. Ener_qy Savings Projects $112001000 A program was initiated in 2002 to provide for the implementation of projects that would save the Commission energy costs in its operating budget. Discussions with both Xcel and CenterPoint have identified additional projects that are eligible for energy savingl, rebates and will save the Commission additional energy costs. In order to qualify, projects must pro five. year pay back. Delta Air J� Lines has indicated that they would like the MAC to und 10 with reimbursement to be made to the MAC in accordance with the agreemerr to -Dart of the Delta Air Lines OTG concessions upgrade project. 13 — Energy Management Center Energy Savinns Protects A program was Initiated in 20 ' 02 to provide for the imple Commission energy costs in its operating budget. Discus identified additional projects that are eligible for energy s� additional energy costs. In order to qualify, projects must 21 - Field and Runway Airside Bituminous Rehabilitation/Electrii This is an ongoing program to construct or r( lighting within the Air Operations Area. Inspi be made to determine what areas should be Pavement Joint Sealing/Repair This is an ongoing program to provi scheduled for sealing will be deterrr crack and surface repairs. .110h rwCKWUMV111, M%;JJ0V111LL%LtU1J - t - This is an ongoing program to have deteriorg replace til Gates 5 been requesting at MSP since May �ppced along the e except fd .. , ' * - , - . Lack instrument ap u W, weather mini Tower staff strong(„ 9 Xcel and C' f will save the comm tY year pay back. 1$500,00ci s , I - ants airfield electrical or lighting, and electrical circuits will 1,0er this year's project. 7W, 0 $650,000 1 concrete pavements. The areas J will also provide for limited $2,200,000 of concrete pavement in the aircraft operational areas that finance is no longer a viable option. This year's project will �*,M`, .0, Q o a apron located adjacent to Concourse C between 'W $1,900,000 .LSF system be acquired and installed for the approach to MALSF system is a medium -intensity approach lighting system ,unway centerline from the threshold to a distance of 1,400 feet. Sys at MSP are equipped with approach lighting systems (ALS) limits the throughput of the airport during conditions requiring an portant visual clues for crews are not available, requiring higher ;ed airport capacity. The airlines and the FAA Air Traffic Control in of the 30R MALSF. Miscellaneous -Airfield IM40ruction! $400,000 This is an ongoing program To consolidate various incidental items beyond the capabilities of the maintenance personnel, projects too small to be accomplished independently or to handle airside problems requiring repair which come up unexpectedly. Perimeter Gate Security Improvements $575,000 This project is -a continuation of the 2011 perimeter gates improvements project and provides for additional improvements to the existing security gates (specifically Gates 435, 269, 222, and 122), along with spare gate components - 08/29/11 50 Runway 12R/30L Tunnel Rehabilitation - Lighting & Pumping Station $1,425,000 This project provides for the rehabilitation of the storm water lift station serving the vehicular tunnel located beneath Runway 12R/30L, along with improvements to the existing subdrain system and replacement/enhancements to the tunnel lighting_ Storm Water Ponds 3 & 4 Enhancements $5,000,000 This project provides for modifications to storm water detention ponds 3 and 4 to reduce overflows into Snelling Lake. The pond 4 outlet control structure will be replaced and a 60 -inch storm sewer pipe installed to increase the outflow capacity of the pond. The pond 3 spillway will be replaced to prevent future spillway washout. The outlet structure will also be replaced and a parallel 72 -inch storm sewer installed to increase the outflow capacity from pond 3. Runway 3011 Deicing Pad Subdrain This project includes the installation of a lift station and groundwater beneath the 30R deicing pad and route it 26 -Terminal Roads/Landslde Tunnel/Bridge Rehabilitation A Bridge and Tunnel Safety inspections Report was pr and outlines maintenance recommendations to be imp 31 — Parking T1/T2 Parking Structure Rehabilitation This is an ongoing program to maintain the in typically include concrete repair, joint sealant lighting improvements. This project will implE and Management Program Report" complete, Customers that are diverted to T2 MSP Value Parking enter the Ora Level or level 2. To exit from they up to level 3 to exit. This moved, , experience, this project will adg , I levels such that entering and exist $800,000 potentially impacted year 500 000 I�ng'.' , 161111111stQtures. Projects concrete sealing and in the "Condition Assessment $350,000 ing is atpity at r r who choose to take advantage of I ramp u nd then park on either the Mezzanine i istorriers,'renn eed ramp down to the ground level or -onfusing he customer's ing rs. in order to improve on t gates, and signage to existing portals at the helixes at these Lprits will both be through the helixes. $1,600,000 lstrjct�lin 2012 adjacent to the north skyway. Once this check kpoint will be remodeled and reconfigured in a north -south - current TSA equipment guidelines- An open area directly north will also be in -filled to add an additional 130 feet lineal feet of $1,100,000 Curbside deterioration of The existing a and drain system is in need of replacementlrepair due to d the canopy rooflnW,nd freezing problems within the drain system. The redesign of the roof panels to meet curr HA structural requirements resulted in higher than expected costs and only the south half of the canopy was repaired. This project will provide for the repair of the north end of the canopy including some required repairs to the east roadway lights_ PassengerAmenities Concessions Revenue Development/Upgrades $150,000 This project will fund miscellaneous upgrades (finishes, furniture. condiment stations. etc.), signage and/or modified connections to utilities for the concession programs at Terminal 2 -Humphrey. 08/29/11 51 08/29/11 52 Design Fees Environmental Assessment (EA) $100,000 MAC is working with the FAA to complete a Federal Environmental Assessment (EA) that will then allow MAC to participate in funding through the Federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) or the Passenger Facility Charge (PEC) program for eligible airport development. This process is required to be completed prior to the start of expansion projects associated with Phases 1 and 2 of the recently adopted Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP) for MSP. This year's program is a continuation of the 2011 efforts towards completing the EA document. Airport Layout Plan (ALP) In conjunction with the recently adopted LTCP for MSP and must complete an update to the overall Airport Layout Plan proposed expansion projects. A project must h s be show,ton 'e S' funding through the All? or PFC programs. The effop FAA electronic format standards include the need n! via aerial photogrammetry, data compilation/verifl,J Ui . anc Surveys for enhanced survey control points. 39 — Public Areas/Roads Landside Pavement Rehabilitation 4 41 This project provides for the reconstruction of 28(h Avenue N E. 62nd Street. This roadway has been used as a haul route the constant pounding by heavily loaded trucks h*1 as. X major reconstruction is required. MAC is discus section of the road within the City's maintenang Roadway Fixture Refurbishment Many of the light poles, overhead c roadways are in need of repainting these fixtures utilizing both MAC st $1,000,000 deral EA process, MAC ,jentify the locations of )d ALP in order to receive ie ALP to meet the new hosurveys data collection N Nati�Aal Geodetic y Highway 62 (Cross-town) to a -ects over the years and ad a, to to the point where of MinneT, ssible funding for a $100,000 Nhim-�,r llMs, and canopies on the airport fldprovide for refurbishment of required. 46 — Hangars and other 13 1�11'15101 ORKIV $100,000 Building H Upgrades Building H house's MAC's Dri enter as well as other airport tenants. The exterior of this facility including the concrete bloc re and windows require repair and replacement. This project ill in ting of it "' !'4 lock, repair/replacement of existing windows, and re- paintin A I'P 63 —P CC Pmpnts $9,100,000 Th" 'ngoing progra.m to nd upgrade existing CCTV systems to ensure the safety and sASP. An analysis of # lai i ng CGTV system was completed in 2010. The existing system c old and new t gy with some equipment in excess of 16 years old. The consd CTV working a as to replace and upgrade the existing CCTV system to a fully digital sy a CCTV s Integrator will be selected to assist in the development and Man System installation o rn (VMS) and Physical Security information System (PISM) software. AFI e installed and evaluated. A program to systematically replace and New integrate the appro 5xisting cameras will begin. MAC is working with TSA on an Other Transaction Agreeme provide funding for eligible project costs. 66 — Fire Post Road Fuel Farm Fire Protection Improvements $3,500,000, In order to enhance fire protection at the Post Road fuel storage facility,;a -series of improvements will be implemented. These include the installation of a 30 foot by 50 foot pump house with foam proportioning equipment and associated piping, and electric motor operated nozzles. This project also includes Emergency Fuel Shutoff (EFSO) System monitoring upgrades, heat sensors, and additional controls to monitor drain valves. 76 — Environment $3,000,000 Storm Water Pond Dredgin This project provides for the removal and proper disposal of accumulated sediments in storm water detention ponds 3 and 4 to increase the storm water runoff storage volume. North Fuel Island OilfWater Separator $1,000,000 This project provides for the installation of an oil/water separator (OWS) and modification of pavements at the MAC North Fueling Facility. The OWS provides storm water protection from spills and releases during vehicle fueling and fuel transfer activities. The current fuel island directs storm water flows to a grass retention basin where, in the event of a release, impacted soils are'removed and disposed of at an 0,,MSP r,commended water quality t % approved facility. This project will bring MAC controlled facilities ud'.1,111t best management practices. MACNOMS Upgrades The Metropolitan Airports Commission's system of thirt),O, in the surrounding communities, provides high quality, track data and also provides verification of modeled nox` noise Consent Decree. The noise sensors are comprise preamplifier, and microphone mounted on a tilting tower. provide a means of system communications and equipm ermad q The system's components, installed in three phases beginning in 1 of usage, with over sixty percent of the component teen component, the analyzer, which was designed In Interoperability with current technology is restri protocol. In addition, conditions affecting sen prevalent as a result of component age and ed e would address these concerns and present QQ on lr fun" events, and frequency analysis. Ponds I and 2 Access Control This project provides for the instE and 2 that is located within an e.X' numerous times on a daily baso secured area as defined by TSA, unauthorized'"" r the N likelihood 0gg 46nmental nd'r�i%`,g.-put000r a - to " ONRI ponen pack up power. &average over fifteen years ea he system's main longer s' I pported. Its ed non- ta and communication 0 Parance are also becoming more ental factors. New hardware uch as real-time data, audio of R Z, $100,000 a motorized'. of gate at the entrance to MSP ponds I ab staging si ' g.3 st Road, The pond area is accessed sq'SMAC departments, tenants, and consultants. While not a 11y closing gate would minimize the potential for access by OW (IM&W and liability concerns. There would be a reduced IN ti , MO. $350,000 'UY anis actor4 Conco �' J The. r ntly owns a `uita,_ f0fror taining the organic materials diverted from the solid w� m* from the termina. I anics Project Team is recommending the installation of the O'date the increasing volumes of n a site on Concours ccomm material generated by the In limited by the storage capacity afforded The program', ld is severely 0 s! fid, to uApn b urrently being A There are also no storage options available for the number of puld othe needed. a ditio ji To facilitate t U the organics composting program. it is necessary to provide a permanent location tor. This will enable the program to expand by providing adequate capacity and thepa' ely and efficiently handle organic materials on a daily basis. The containers that are used nsport the diverted -organic materials, occasionally through public areas, need to be washed on a regular basis to remove residue, prevent odors and deter pests. This project also includes an indoor space, near the compactor, to allow for container wash down that will help maintain acceptable -sanitation standards. 81 -St. Paul $100,000 Joint and Crack Repairs Given the extremely poor sub grade materials at this airport, the need for crack repair and joint sealing is critical to maintain pavement strength and pavement life. An inspection of the pavement will be completed to determine the areas most in need of repair_ 08/29/11 53 08/29/11 54 MAC Building Maintenance $%OO,000 This is an ongoing program to provide for facility modifications to ensure continued efficient operation of MAC buildings or modifications necessary to meet the requirements of the tenants. Pp��ement Rehabilitation $1�00,000 This is an ongoing program to rehabilitate aircraft operational area� (runways, taxiways, apronn) through bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some instances, reconstruction, to restore the surfaces to a smooth, even condition and improve overall operating conditions. This project will include the reconstruction of portions of Taxiway Alpha north of Runway 9-27, along with necessary subgrade rehabilitation and electrical system upgrades. This pavement is exhibiting deterioratign and major transverse cracks have developed- RunwaV 14132 Reconstruction 82 — Lake Elmo Runway 14132 has poor subgrade soils and cracks are to ke-qp`,.- I from year to year. The long term plan for the airport discusses potential r n of. goin ol a complete reconstruction in its existing location does not rn e fir -M., 4 he rurf cated, this existing runway pavement would become a a (I a standa et wide. This project includes reconstruction of the center 40 -foot i rimary run ing any necessary subgrade work and overall joint/pavement seal,, vide a recons ructed more stable pavement surface for the runway and is not a throw -away use as a taxiway. One of the runway connectors will also be reconstructed under this p e . . . . . . . . 84 - Flying Cloud Alleyway Rehabilitation This is an ongoing program to rehabilitate air taxiways, -aprons) through bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some i,, es r t re the surfaces to a smooth, even condition and improve overall operatin tio� is ties rehabilitation of the remaining alleyways in the north buildi EasfiWest Perimeter Road $50,000 As part of the runway incursion rqVu steps MAMG fing Cloud, an east1west perimeter road will be constructed to allow for t eling trucks a ance vehicles access across the north end of the airfield without dire e taxiways or runways. This year's project includes funds needed for the construction of th rimeter road that coincides with the Thunderbird FBO king lo king lo Thisp Mudesinsuat.. M portion! n Itary sewer and water system as well as installation structW of ot s necessary o n Ion n the south building area. Funding for this project will b7 by others. velopment— All rs $100,000 Simil expended in 2 1 a revenue generating parcel at Flying Cloud, these costs allow for MAC to or prepar the Reliever Airports for potential development- The costs for eloper who ultimately takes on the commercial development. each p rcel ed Fundin for this ed by others. Pavement Rehabilill lo' $200,000 This is arongoing pi �rehabilitate aircraft operational areas (runways.taxiways, aprons) through bituminous overlays, seal coats, nrinsome instances, reumnnUocbom, to restore the surfaces to a smooth . even condition and improve overall operating conditions. This project includes rehabilitation cJportions of Taxiway Aand Taxiway (| along with pavement crack sealing. $300,000 _ Through the Runway Safety Action Team (RSAT), the FAA, MAC and tenants have identified (' ! improvements that can oemade nothe existing airfieldsignage x/improve operations and reduce the potential for runway incursions. This project ino\udeothoinstohadunofncwvsigmy,modificmtionotumxisUnQ sign faces and the removal of some signs. Improvements are also necessary with the airfield electrical 09/29/11 circuitry and vaults to accommodate the new signs. This project also includes modifications to two of the airfield power -operated security gates - 86 — Anoka County - Blaine Pavement Rehabilitation — Runways $200,000 This is an ongoing program to rehabilitate aircraft operational areas (runways, taxiways, aprons) through bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some instances, reconstruction, to restore the surfaces to a smooth, even condition and improve overall operating conditions. This project includes Runway 9127 grooving, and full depth crack repairs and crack sealing for that same runway and the full length parallel taxiway pavement. 11111�11 10 55 4.81 441JO-N ui 0 Q z LIUDDLUD JOODDUDO� I 4},0N P0 -N o$ $ 3 Jnr't� __ ui S Ij V V L y 0 UJ W Z �� foo �� O ti num sm SK is 3n"0000 16 t: �aonlllY9 D; jel. "'MR, 1: din LIUDDLUD JOODDUDO� I 4},0N P0 -N o$ $ 3 Jnr't� __ ui S Ij V V L y 0 UJ W Z �� foo �� O ti num sm SK is 3n"0000 16 t: �aonlllY9 D; jel. 20,113 Capital Improvement Program Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport August 29, 2011 2010 Development Program Noise Mitigation Settlement $1,300,000 This project is continuation of the implementation of the noise mitigation program based on the Noise Exposure Map contained in the court ordered Consent Decree. Th ;,project funds will be expended for professional services and for homeowner reimbursements for app noi0r& itigation work in the 2005 s 60-64 DNL contours (Phase 3). OKMEM ".1. ROOM Post 2010 Prociram Prolects 08/29/11 62 10 —Terrninal I- Lindbergh Safety/Security Projects This project will provide an automated and wireless lop% 11 oval notlficatrdfl2gy�tern for the existing Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) Indl IN arminal 1 -Lindbergh and Terminal 2 -Humphrey- The system will tie into the exist( fa ring and Card Access systems and be connected to the Emergency q !cations When a door to an AED is opened, the ECC will immediately be ill be ablAE;t Fire Department personnel to the general location. If a 911 Barest tification lights will be able to be alarrhed/flashed and overhead to identify the AED location. Telecommunications Room Eouiomehf tin uffiVA—abid 6`- $2,350,000 The MAC network (MACNet) cilr Ile G 6 1.111�1 X .11, r 01 le Parking Revenue Control System. The credit card industry 8" •"' clrlel SPId se stand which merchants, like the MAC, are required to meet to protect Ga data. Am Y ese s are security standards for the physical locations where MA dipmen is rially the network equipment itself must have added security fea r tent una t h o ill M access. This program will address these standards by provi i equipment anc relevant network hardware for the 150 telecommunications rooms campus. This program is being coordinated with related projects in( r.fibe Data Center. projects to avoid duplication of effort and cost. TV This will4l, onroar $100,000 ipational Saf Ith A( 1161" " ation (OSHA) requires that employers protect their �s that work on r ext to roof edges,,and other locations where there could be the for injuries due to tions range from warnirigs-ignage and spotters to guardrail and tie ps- A Roof Fall Pro Committee has been formed that is reviewing roof areas around 5 to determiq tial hazards and mitigation options. This program is being AZruadress ro tection In those areas deemed to present an imminent hazard to 5, tot be ssed in a current roof repair project. 7&.Ipuad ot be__ Facilities Rehabilt-1 Electrical In -a Viffiabilitation Program $2,500,000 There are fifty-thre1cal substations that serve Terminal 1 -Lindbergh complex- It is imperative 114 , that these substations Ire inspected, cleaned and upgraded in order to ensure their continued performance. This is a continuation of a multi -phase program that began in 2009. Terminal Miscellaneous Modificatlons $3,000,000 Each year, there is a list of 'maintenance" projects that are beyond the capability of MAC's maintenance staff to accomplish. These projects are prioritized and completed either as a series of contracts or as purchase orders. The list of potential projects will be compiled and prioritized in early 2013. 11 Summarized below are the categories of the projects which are included in the Terminal Miscellaneous Modifications program: Building Exterior Rehabilitation A continuation of the program to rehabilitate the exterior of the terminals and other MAC buildings including roof and curtain wall rehabilitation - Terminal Electrical Modifications An ongoing program to address electrical issues in the terminals due to age and deterioration of the existing systems or modifications necessary for improved reliability. ApAtp 2 6 E 10 Terminal Mechanical Modifications 2 Z n lra An ongoing program to address mechanical issues the . �, 1. 1 k I It age and deterioration of the existing systems or modifications necessary 'ove "vF�� all 21 Ott Terminal Miscellaneous Modifications -;h A;, N h,k An ongoing program to update and remodel a of !94. rojeGtS to series changing requirements. This may be accomplis spb meet the requirements of the various tenants or rn into a Ject. MSP Campus Modifications An ongoing program to modify or remodel areas within atheriti r,,,,pund the MSP Campus to � meet the needs of the various tenants/gene, C/ MAC depa'lZing the facilities. 6 W *Historically, projects have be45 � these fi egories and the highest priority projects within any of ;Vrole 4. cl ded in the program. IE 50,000 Emerg ency Power Upgrades S 11k �mergency lighting were Studies and surveys of Terminal I And1trans��SWIWI It completed in 2008. This year's t w il contip e de nd implementation of emergency g power and lighting corrective w lously ideqtf, t,; 5,-� Restroomfl rade Pro $1,000,000 A study of all restrooms i Lindbergh was completed in 2010 to develop a program to upgrade/modernize the rest trial 1 -Lindbergh- From this study, each restroom was prioritize �,ition. Th 'would provide for the phased modernization of the r troresource and energy saving upgrades, and ADA 'F",}ged finis' fin Unit Re t $2,250,000 are existing a serving Terminal 1 -Lindbergh that were installed with the original ii I construction and a 0 years old- A study of these units has been completed that ,each unit based o condition, and its ability to adequately heat or cool the spaces it rograrn will re n units that have been identified as needing replacement phased ove period. of e ated project costs include modifications and installation of the new units, cations to building walls to facilita f quipmen upgraded electrical and if-mrieratu tos abatement where required. conveyance.sv drades z. $2,000,000 moving walks, A study of the MSP us conveyance systems including elevators, escalators, dumbwaiters, and material lifts was completed by the Facilities Department's conveyance consultant_ Thestudy evaluated the useful life of each system including the availability of replacement parts and technical support of the equipment. Many of the systems are being operated by outdated technology that is generally less efficient than modem control equipment Some of the systems do not include safety devices or features that are commonly installed on modern equipment. A multi-year program will therefore be implemented to "modernize" and replace elements of the conveyance systems_ 05/29/11 12 63 08/29/11 64 Plumbing Infrastructure upgrade Program $500,000 In 2010, MAC staff prepared a preliminary study of the reliability and maintainability of the existing plumbing infrastructure. Portions of the existing plumbing infrastructure serving Terminal 1 -Lindbergh are over 40 years old, have systems that are undersized for today's demands, contain isolation valves that are either inaccessible or no longer function, and utilize aging water meter systems. There are also deteriorated sections of the existing sanitary and storm water systems. This is a multi-year program - Way -Finding Sion Backlighting Replacement $1,600,000 The majority of the Terminal 1 -Lindbergh and Terminal 2-HuMphrey,and parking ramp signs utilize cold-cathodelneon lighting technology that has a high failure and 11 J ed repair options. New technology LED lighting has been incorporated into all new OR echnology has been proven n AV. to resilient in temperature and other environmental extpp, e I- I ng solid-state and long lasting. This is a Multi-year program to replace exist; eon lighting components with LED components. 0", Conference Center Upgrades clect The Airport Conference Center was constructed i 64--,:,' Will V Brence center with new carpeting as the existing carpeting is" t need of reply New electrical and data outlets will also be installed in the �.'to improve access around the conference tables. Terminal Curtainwall Repair $100,000 The rubber gaskets that are integral to seal]. curtainwalom air infiltration N heating and cooling loss and water intrusi M5.and require placement in many locations. The gasket failures result in id he- Jing costs and repair costs resulting from water damage to the building wall bly, T am will provide for the replacement of failing gaskets and relatxpirs UrRIN.""'IItystem. C -G Connector Soffit Repal Ai$200,000 The soffit under the Concours nect r i individual insulated panels fastened to the connector structure. A n tr;f these pan damaged by high winds over the years. Additional panels have be ed by leaking'dated to the moving walkway belts. This project would remove and damaged panels as well as provide an opportunity for the inspection of the structure s 9,panels to determine if additional repair is required, $200,000 'Ru will. fun''`;': ous upg . pv(finishes, furniture, condiment stations, etc.), signage t odified conned Mitles forth concession programs at Terminal 1 -Lindbergh. all Seatina Improve' . 1 $800,000 selection process tai ce public seating was conducted. As part of this process, the wer to the new was evaluated and a best and final offer to provide the new seat, This pr, 11 expand public seating replacements to other areas of the terminal inc i Vicar a. d transportation atrium areas. L .. Way -Finding M`U�Affi' vements $300,000 With the change' ' ' AM designation from Lindbergh Terminal to Terminall -Undberg h, there is a need to modify adds interior terior and exterior signage. In addition, there is also a need to add LRT signage to improve access/visibility to the public, add missing elevator signs, and modify overhead illuminated and non -illuminated signage to improve passenger way -finding Gogcoqr;e Service Center Upgrades $2,000,000 The current service centers located throughout TI -Lindbergh were built in 199912001 and have not been upgraded since they were built. A new prototype service center was constructed in 2010 when the center at C1 was relocated to C3. The remaining ten service centers will be upgraded with the technology and amenities included with the C3 prototype. 13 08/29/11 WFIDS/Electronic Video Information Display $600,000 The installation of Multi -User Flight Information Display (MUFIDS)and Electronic Video Information Display Systems (EVIDS) throughout T1 -Lindbergh and T2 -Humphrey has been so successful that there have been requests for the installation of these electronic information tools in other areas in the terminal complex. These areas include the Custom Border Patrol (CBP)/Federal inspection Services (FIS) areas in both terminals and the T2 -Humphrey baggage claim area. This project would also provide for the replacement of monitors that were installed in 2009 with newer LED backlit technology operational Improvements Open Architecture Building Automation (OAES This program will upgrade all MAC building automation sys the airport can bid maintenance and construction contracts replace Siemens controllers and Legacy Honeywell GOPI Honeywell, Circon, Distech, or TAC systems Ilk continuation of a multi-year program Fiber optic cable infrastructure is the basic vehicle OR communications and computer-based technologies. I replacement, and expansion. This project will provide replacing materials that don't meet current MAC stand existing capacity has been used up - Wireless Network Control System This project Will provide a campus wide, system would allow remote wireless acc Monitoring and Control System (IMACS MAC network from the terminals as well Concourse G Improvements An inspection of the Con roofing of the concourse would include upgrading clerstory curtain wall sys units Air $2,250,000 the �, snMark open protocol so that W ly, This project will Nd controllers from • rodurt lines. This is a r Jure 'upgrade, of cabling infi-691ructure including hnacitv between locations where inteW. er a two year period. This MAC Facilities Intelligent m to data and drawings from the ORION,, $6,200,000 by the M nsultant Indicates that a complete re- 41on of the re FIS facility is required. The project to MAC energy standards and the repair/replacement of the Required drains, roof hatch guardrails, and removal and included. The project will be coordinated with the Delta .-iccount for new roof penetrations for new air handling hi s project in accordance with the agreements to be (cessions upgrade project. $1,200,000 Savin V s Pro acts ram was initiated In 2 rovide for the implementation of projects that would save the tin energy costs in i, ating budget- Discussions with both Xcel and Centerpoint have ditional projects r eligible for energy saving rebates and will save the Commission ad costs. In qualify, projects must provide a five year pay back. Delta Air fines , Qthat d like the MAO to undertake these projects with reimbursement to be made t W nce with the agreements to be in place as part of the he Delta Air Lines OTG concess ,.off, oject_ 13 — Energy Managemeini'�Vnter $3,500,000 Energy Savings Projects A program was initiated in 2002 to provide for the implementation of projects that would save the Commission energy costs In its operating budget. Discussions with both Xcel and Centerpoint have identified additional projects that are eligible for energy saving rebates and will save the Commission additional energy costs. In order to qualify, projects must provide a five year pay back. ,000 Alternative Energy Projects solar $1,000power, and geo This project will evaluate potential alternative energy projects including wind power, thermal. 14 M. 08/29/11 M. 21 - Field and Runway Airside Bituminous Rehabilitation/Electrical Construction $500,000 This is an ongoing program to construct or reconstruct bituminous pavements and airfield electrical or lighting within the Air Operations Area. Inspection of taxiway pavements, lighting, and electrical circuits will be made to determine what areas should be prioritized for rehabilitation under this year's project. Pavement Joint Sealing/Repair $650,000 This is an ongoing program to provide for the resealing of joints in existing concrete pavements. The areas scheduled for sealing will be determined in the spring of 2013. This project will also provide for limited crack and surface repairs. Pavement Rehabilitation – Aprons This is an ongoing program to replace sections of concrete have deteriorated to a point where routine maintenance i4 replace approximately 6,000 square yards of concrete Gates C7 and C9_ /M MiscellaneousAirfieldConstruction This is an ongoing program to consolidate various incid maintenance personnel, projects too small to be accom requiring repair which come up unexpectedly. munway -jzKi.5uL_ i unnel Kenamirtation – my This project includes the mill and overlay of the pavement within the Runway 12R/30L tunnel. , 26 - Terminal RoadslLandsicle Tunnel/Bridge Rehabilitation A Bridge and Tunnel Safety Inspecti and outlines structural maintenance 31 – Parking This is an ongoing program tolfm" typically Include concrete repair, lighting impro 11pro and 36 – Tr K t– Hurrfof Sa a'Nl 1, ty Projects will upgrade lergency ev; $1,900,000 t operational areas that i. This year's project will ancourse C between n� the capaUM14-lkol,"k, Rhe g id e airside problems ._ 14 � FS-15RIN M�'Mg -11MISM" 4-,7%,,".Y1 " ��$275,000 R.5 avement s the section of $100,000 in 2 e report is updated each year IWQ $3,500,000 of the airports multi-level parking structures. Projects ,ement, expansion joint repairs, concrete sealing and recommendations made in the "Condition Assessment L97 and updated in 2012. len $4,00 ' 0,000 paging system at the Humphrey Terminal to comply with current similar upgrade was completed on Concourse A and B. CBIS'/ _ - Shel1 $14,100,000 In 200 plantPddesign efforts for an automated, in-line Explosives Detection System(. ��": ` " " �" ° mg system for Terminal 2 -Humphrey, based upon plans to expand the terminal to ac itional airline capacity. The original concepts and plans have been redesigned to rn TSA furnished high-speed screening equipment with the TSA funding 90 percent of the eligib sign efforts through an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) for Design Services. MAC has now applied for an OTA to help fund the construction costs. Once this project is complete, the existing screening process located in the ticketing lobby will be moved behind the scenes. The removal of the EDS equipment from the lobby will provide additional customer queuing space and area to install additional ticket counters as required. TSA will provide funding for 90% of the eligible project costs Operational Improvements Bas Make-up $11,100,000 The existing bag make-up area is currently operating at capacity and will be required to be expanded with the addition of new gates. 15 09/29/11 Design Fees Three Gate Expanslon $4,950,000 This program includes design fees only for work related to the proposed 3 -gate expansion at T2 — Humphrey. It is proposed that design of the facility expansion, companion apron expansion and associated airside and landside utility work be completed concurrent with the environmental review so that upon completion of the environmental document, MAC could move forward with advertising, bidding and award of the projects as soon as possible should demand require it. 39— Public Areas/Roads Landside Pavement Rehabilitation This is an ongoing program to reconstruct the airport's roadways', 2011 include a micro surfacing project on inbound Glumack Drive road in the Y-3 tunnel. _Afik. Roadway Fixture Refurbishment Many of the light poles, overhead obstruction bars, sig roadways are in need of repainting and maintehance. these fixtures utilizing MAC staff and seasonal help as 1-494/34`h Ave lat-girchange Enhancements Diverging Diamond Interchainfle (DDI} The 1-494 and 34 Avenue South interchange is located at the between Airport Lane and American Boulevard Easo g, eastbound exit ramp from 1-494 to northbound 34 the length of the ramp. As traffic demand incre. efficiently handle the traffic. As this interchan- itical range plans, MAC and the City have partner . , pply Development (TED) pilot program. This pro that will improve the statewide trans o tion ark r interchange improvements will conn x0fin d in 11 avlbl, , .., ' * interchange (DDI), increasing cap Ic', ecre si 'P tercha that of completely replacing the eN, e. combination of a TED grant (70,1*imbursement 46 — Hangars and other Bu MAC's buildin, F. the $400,000 Projects proposed for the overlay of the cargo $100.000 airport it of $6,000,000 d n the City of Bloomington, hou vement, the in traffic that extend two-thirds liar n 8' e unable to safely and k 's and the City of Bloomington's long a,,�e Transportation Economic a share of the costs for projects nomic9 rowth. The proposed ge to a diverging diamond and conflict points at a cost far below 85% of this project will be funded by a of Bloomington (15%). $4,200,000 assessed the condition of the roof systems of the panagement program. Buildings that require either )Id Parking Ramp Core building, the Red/Blue Hub $ F,, inn Parkin Lot U 1,050,000 g and parking lat structed over 20 yeas ago. The building has now come back to MA pgraded w Tsement from the FAA as part of a lease extension agreement. The build t is not in o be reimbursed through the new lease agreement, however the pavement I I d to. that complete reconstruction will be required. Improvements include comple e existing parking lot, expansion of the lot, and storm water drainage improvements. $1,700,000 Building F Tower Dernal �Mi,Wf h v Building F is located on 34 'Avenue south of Terminal 2 -Humphrey and consists 0 a ca rg 0 ware Q se building and a three story office tower. The building was formally leased by Northwest and then Delta Air Lines. As of January 1, 2011 the lease expired. Delta would like to retain the cargo/warehouse portion of the building along with an amount of landside parking spare on the east side for the cargo building and airside parking for cargo coordination and overflow aircraft parking. A study was completed in 2010 that considered the options of mothballing the office tower portion of the building for future demolition or to proceed with demolition now. The cost to demolish the office tower was the most cost effective option. t6 IM 08/29/11 M 56— TradeslMaintenance, Buildings Trades Building Cooling System Improvements $600,000 The Trades building was constructed in 1997 and included an air-cooled chiller that provides cooling to the administrative offices area. The existing chiller has been subject to frequent service and repair due to short cycling of the two reciprocating compressors. This short cycling wastes energy and accelerates the wear on the compressors. Options to improve the cooling system have been evaluated with the following goals: (1) improve the efficiency and reliability of the central cooling plant, (2) add cooling to other areas within the Trades Building, and (3) add an air handler to the records retention trailer adjacent to the Trades Building to improve dehumidification. A new split chiller comprised of an air cooled condensing unit (outdoors.) connected to an indoor evaporator utilizing six compressors was the system that provided for the best energy payback. 63 — Police Public Safety Facility This project will relocate the MAC Police Department t complex. The new facility will have convenient access response to both terminals via airside or public roadwE structure that will accommodate future growth and con Operations into one building. CCTV Improvements I'A This Is an ongoing program to add new and upgrade existing security of MSP_ An analysis of the existing CCTV! consists of a mix of old and new technology with consensus of the GCTV working group was toU digital system. In 2012, a CCTV Systems Int installation of new Video Management 6yste l was an, software. New IP cameras were evalu they ill replace and integrate the approximat 1 8( 01 i 1g, required. TSA will provide funding fo le rojecU.. 76 — Environment This project provides for ret aircraft deicing occurs to en deicing operatqwm.,11%0.1 81 — St. This i t rill Investigate aNd Th, rm sewer system 14 rovements will also gking up into the This is an ong6TI h, bituminous overlaysi even condition and ii 4/22 pavements and 83 — Airlake $300,000 tside of the terminal Airport J $4,000,000 am, nsure the safety and mpl he existing system in excess:' ears old, The the A tin CTV system to a fully silt in the development and Aj&,,information System (PISM) t IM V,,11program to systematically 'd expand the camera coverage as WIN M $2,600,000 sewer pipes and manholes at various locations where 1 and storage of glycol -impacted storm water resulting from Az $500,000 ,tqp )r storm drainage in the oldest and lowest portion of the airport. site is not removing storm water from the as effectively as it ng floods by insuring no ground water is infiltrating the old Ming additional groundwater pumping capacity to keep up. $300,000 itate aircraft operational areas (runways, taxiways, aprons) through ii If in some instances, reconstruction, to restore the surfaces to a smooth, �11 operating : at per ing conditions. This project includes rehabilitation of the Runway the parallel taxiway_ Pavement Rehabilitation $200,000 This is an ongoing program to rehabilitate aircraft operational areas (runways, taxiways, aprons) through bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some instances, reconstruction, to restore the surfaces to a smooth, even condition and improve overall operating conditions. This project includes rehabilitation of the runway and taxiway pavements, full depth crack repairs and crack sealing. 17 08/29/11 84 - Flying Cloud Runway 18136 Reconstruction Senment. 3 $1,700,000 Segment 3 of Runway 18/36 includes Runway end 36 to the Runway I OR/281- safety area boundary and lighting cable replacement for the Runwdy 18/36 parallel taxiway. In addition, the runway safety area deficiency will be corrected and the runway extended to 2,800 -feet as recommended in the long term comprehensive plan. This project will also include a supplemental wind cone on the aiffield, necessary updates to the Airport Layout Plan (ALP), and Pavement grooving of Runway 10R/28L. East[West Perimeter Road As part of the runway incursion reduction steps MAC is taking at will be constructed to allow for tenants, fueling trucks and rnaintE end of the airfield without direct access to the taxiways or runwa 86 — Anoka County — Blaine Pavement Rehabilitation - Alleywa This is an ongoing program to rehabilitate aircraft op bituminous overlays, seal coats, or in some instances, r -q * even condition and improve overall operating conditio alleyways in the east building area. $250,000 Cloud, an east/west perimeter road vehicles ;access across the north gp �Ny roject will include the east. 18 through a smooth, on of the W 70 0 C� CL j 0 LLI 1�9 Z E Z) 0 ui CL > 0- W z OD w C) Cf) I-- F - z 0 LOr 1 j D LL wm 0 (D LU a- Q z w Z w C) wwui— CL w U) W LL- 0 Q w C) CL m rj) LLJ (9 C) Z O-ywoz)O;Rc) o w (D 0 0� 6 cn CD ww ZU) w 2 CO 0 w C) W W LL C) ik F- S Lu A- L pra w z Vr/ F- C) g U) 13� A 0) w 19 z 0 C� CL j 0 LLI 1�9 Z E Z) 0 ui CL > 0- W z OD w C) Cf) I-- F - z 0 LOr 1 j D LL wm 0 (D LU a- Q z w Z w C) wwui— CL w U) W LL- 0 Q w C) CL m rj) LLJ (9 C) Z O-ywoz)O;Rc) o w (D 0 0� 6 cn CD ww ZU) w 2 CO 0 w C) W W LL C) ik F- S Lu A- L pra w z Vr/ F- C) g U) 13� -Z uj �:2 jw. wz 2. 00 alf 0 LIJi IF -If --- I W t-- > 0 0, 'w p < -:5< cc z CL Q E -0 o () aE 5 w, 0 :�i w` LU Z le- -<- A� :E �2 w (o m L.L 0 d 0 Ile 0 < 7-1 — Z) w z x: 2 co 0 Z3: w 0 w w 0 0� ol j� 0 Z tr CL w cr-I A VON -Z uj �:2 jw. wz 2. 00 alf 0 LIJi IF -If --- I W t-- > 0 0, 'w p < -:5< cc z CL Q E -0 o () aE 5 w, 0 :�i w` LU Z le- -<- A� :E �2 w (o m L.L 0 d 0 Ile 0 < 7-1 — Z) w z x: 2 co 0 Z3: w 0 w w 0 0� ol j� 0 Z tr CL w cr-I 72 i ,� :•,r1, .; �''T `,.-s's „,.a,,;;at4n4=Ei3i.^;•.:,T:rJ.r^. :.�fir4':. ,;.'b„-bin-Si-::.'_^.C:d;: `"{v„i{,c;Y'ai +Vt. ;i$:."Y.�{„ vr�.�.1: ti,i,'• .rvr5+'it:: ;:t:�:A �•;t �Fiti,1`ig%u•:�:�: C;'�.. t.cv,`j3.�, iA 7. � �: ' S} ' 4;JON L Els t ,t� oda f 73 1 74 m watAmv t�p I K' 1 C[ inti 77 jI 77 u g.1 L'i > 0 cy) LQ LD LLJ Ln LI) 6 (D 6 Ln r, L.D LU 0 w r, as v ('n) O '6106 .6 LL < Lo CD M 061 ,Pv Cj) 0 ai a- C) r ... . .. . ..... . ....... . .. c6 c6 Lu M C) U_ ui c6 L6 M (D -i 0 1-1 .01 Cl 0 0 0 CD C) CD . ff . . Ln CD Ln ui all! -1 SIXV m,o Ea o u g.1 L'i > 0 cy) LQ LD LLJ Ln LI) 6 (D 6 Ln r, L.D LU 0 w r, as v ('n) O '6106 .6 LL < Lo CD M 061 ,Pv Cj) 0 ai a- C) r ... . .. . ..... . ....... . .. c6 c6 Lu M C) U_ ui c6 L6 M (D -i 0 1-1 .01 Cl 0 0 0 CD C) CD . ff . . Ln CD Ln ui all! -1 SIXV we u Lu (IJ r,4 O W rq U) C5 m Lij CL ;eo < U:) LLJ i '� (. r -i o (N � N O0 I M LLI LLJ U.j � 00 061 061 C, � " r,- 4 Ln 1 oi N 11 6 L6 oi co LL rnLO Lr) 00 m . Lf) m LO r, O O Lr) CD U') O LI) CD Ln C) Lr) C) m m rlj rN I -i V-4 CY) C) r,4 0 0 rN c) we MUI W 0 o cY o lD ry u w 0 o N LD m m u w o a u w o m r 0 r z �n�i D 'n\i r >O z m\-� m m ori N p z LR a r� rlj O Z rn iD '\t r-: O ri N N O O m O N O d' F- a. Ln o '`»., vwi a m p H vwi H 00 Q ° o Q 0 ry o m Q h a Q o H a0 ao _. ' J HN lD O O ri m J Z) ct N h m d' N J 0 � W .-1 N a' O Ul h a' h 6 w z o iD tD N 0 O m .-f o N N ct w Z D o m d rl 0 4: w N o m H N W Z a Ul O o o o h N W z � o co 6 0 0 h m W W QLI? c G N W 06 ry cQc G H ri Ln LD N Q O .-i N H Q c G iD w O M 00 CL Q W N h .-i to m d Q N Ul W .-i Ul N d. Q O0 19 `m-{ N a -i CL Q O VJ m O h m cco\' < O D C o N O o N m cQ G a m N N V o V (Yl cc QQc G 0 h lo 0 O m o N CL ccQ C a 'i c a W CO W tL 0 ry/ Ul N 0 lD CO N f+l In N co LL o fn N r-1 `i ni o N O N m w LL o T O o N m m w W LL 7 ui 0 0 m O t0 lD Q m H O h N Z Q t m OR `' N '.R N z Q LD h m N C) Z Q o tD d' o Ul d' Ul LD m a O Le) O w r T �, C9 Z W = z m O Q p F - vl a H O W O o N N m O N O O N O N LL O N '-4 m O N O O N O N LL O N 17 m coo N O O N a o O N 0 N r-1 m coo O N o 1-1 O N N MUI w a O O O O LO C14 rn (D co c) N Q I,- co Ci > 0 Z C15 -Q -.-' C? Q- (1) Cf) C\j m :3 < (-q Lq c) CD N 04 23 C) C\l 0- < C,4 c) -0 cc cl) C14 LL LO t-- (D co AI m to Cl) (D (N -14- —, O O O O LO C14 rn (D co OL-oa0 %-noN 0 L-loO OL-daS OL-6nV 0 L-InP n N OL-unP CV OL-AeW �r\i 0L-jdV'r�i ci OL-leW OL-Qad n N OL-Uef P IN e- noN`.o dasr N �i LO AD 10 N LO AO PJ£ m 0 LO AD PUZ v N LO AD ISL W 9O im tab 0 90 AD Pi£ N 90 AD PUZ N p 90 AD IS L SO AD U14 " o "! llv 90 AD Pic " a o a N N N M 90 AD PUZ r � so ADlsl" Q T 0 0 o m N fV (7N V 60 AD 414 O � o e o U m ri N 60 AD Pi£ " L Zo m 0 0 � p ri cv cJ m 60 AD PUZ m n w a 00 A015L m m o- 0 0 0 N N N Table of Contents for July 2011 Complaint Summary Noise Complaint Map FAA Available Time for Runway Usage MSP All Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators Stage Mix Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events — Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 1 2 3 rd 7 8 9-11 12 13 14-17 18 19 20 21 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 22 MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 23-35 Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL 36-38 A Product of the MAC Aviation Noise and Satellite Program MSP Complaints by City July 2011 City Arrival Departure Other Number of Complaints Number of Complainants of Total Complaints EAGAN 16 2 40 1750. 47 143 1998 53 53.4% MINNEAPOLIS 17 68 16 413 44 310 868 93 23.2% MENDOTA E GI 0 0 6 360, 13 20 399 17 10.7% SAINT PAUL 8 105 0 '4 0 8 125 19 3.3% EDINA 0 0 4 0 2 86 92 4 2.5% APPLE VALLEY 0 45. '" 0 .5 0 0 50 5 1.3% BURNSVILLE. 0 1 0 32 0 15 48 4 1.3% INVER GROVE HEIGHTS 0 20 0 22 1 5 48 3 13% SAINT LOUIS PARK 1 33 0 3 0 9 46 4 1.2% BLOOMINGTON 0 0 17 13 1 4 35 10 0.956 RICHFIELD 0 0 0 0. 0 13 13 4 03% SOUTH SAINT PAUL 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 1 0.3%n ROSEMOUNT 0 2 0 2 0 I 5 2 WEST SAINTPAUL 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I 0% LAKEVILLE I 0 0 0 0 0. ] 1 0% EDEN PRAIRIE 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0% PLYMOUTH 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0% SAVAGE 0 0 0 1 0 0 GOLDEN VALLEY 0 01. 0 0 0 1 l I 0% Total 319 27D0 724 3743 225. Nature of MSP Complaints of Day Complaint Total Total Early/Late 21 720 Engine lam -up 0 35 Excessive Noise 224 3392 Frequency 80 1968 Ground Noise 0 13 Helicopter I i Low Flying 69 1906 Structural Disturbance 0 930 Other 0 178 Total 9538. j Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed vin the Internet. Sum of %Total of Complaints may not equal IOU%duc to rounding. "As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Thcrelme, the number of complaint descriptors may he more than the number orrepurted complaints. Time of Day Total 'rime Total Airlake 0000-0559 3 105 0600-0659 7 89 0700-1159 64 1009 1200-1559 50 657 1600-1959 60 926 2000-2159 20 309 2200-2359 25 .373 2300-2359 6 40 Total 3743 Complaints by Airport Airport Total 1v1SP 3743 Airlake 0 Anoka 21 Crystal 12 Plying Cloud 165 Lake Elmo 0 St. Paul 9 Misc. 0 `total 3950 85 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - MSP International Airport Aviation Noise Complaints for July 2011 �T D-15 Be6ciklyn,,,P�,�Irl( 6, M a p I (G -A 11 Shoreview nore, .v,:,,, Jy L L.—Ur!bp k -Bear WA '� L t. .CrystalE. -E A t; P tji; tF !,U _qz; cul I t: 10 ,Wayzata� Uj IV k j (p, MIS 1porl IN' �p 166,W% in., Heights . . .... .. L D Aft T - S ko W j"! pee KA) zBurnsville tuiIS�1SSIPPI RIVE A t", t Savage PI Rosemou `Pridr'j,��",a P, 4"T . ....... . . . . . . . . 1,j hij Empire Twp. Ver ill Iooiljxl� 'Spring Lake ke Tw armi.n tSon N EEE Number of Complaints per Address 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-4 5-13 14-29 30-57 58-96 97-152 153-335 336-454 86 - 2- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Available Hours forRunwayUse July 2011 (Source: FAA Aviation Systems Performance Metrics Data) r-IR.-id-fifield BWmin,, t Kad Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 3 - 87 All Operations Runway Use Report July 2011 .. . ..... b Richfield field ;lit,. W. y ?4 F V B — ming0 Ea H :RWY Arrival/' bpparture ightArea Overflight count Operations . nt, Percent LastYear Count La s*t Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 16 0.1% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4119 20.5% 3505 17.6% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4128 20.6% 3586 18% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 105 0.5% 2 0% 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 102 0.5% 7 0% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights -3507 17.5% 3949 19.8% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 4336 21.6% 4629 23.2% 35 Arr Bloom ington/Eagan 3783 18.8% 4239 21.3% Total Arrivals 20080 19933 RWY Arrival/ Deppirt"re Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last, Year Percent. 04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 17 0.1% 25 0.1% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 2936 14.7% 2406 12.1% 12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1282 6.4% 1545 7.7% 17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 5165 25.8% 3916 19.6% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 55 0.3% 36 0.2% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 5260 26.3% 5309 26.6% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 5311 26.5% 6711 33.6% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 1 0% ',tot.al Debartures: 20026 19949: Total Operations 40106 .39882 - Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. 88 - 4 - Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report July 2011 RWY Arrival/ :' Departure,' Overflight Area Count . Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last.Year Percent 04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 13 0.1% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 3674 20.5% 2886 17.6% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 3720 20.8% 3015 18.4% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 96 0.5% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 95 0.59/6 1 0% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 3069 17.2% 3148 19.2% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 3895 21.8% 3849 23.5% 35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 3338 18.7% 3486 21.3% Total Arrivals 17887 16398 RWY Arrival/ Departure. Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 13 0.1% 21 0.1% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 2508 14% 1890 10.9% 12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1175 6.5% 1364 7.9% 17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 4796 26.7% 3567 20.6% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 46 0.3% 28 0.2% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4834 26.9% 4639 26.9% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4587 25.5% 5768 33.4% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Totel Departures 17959 17277 Total Operations 35846 33675 'NOTE: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 5 - 89 July 2011 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition Type FAR Part 36 Take- Off Noise Level' Aircraft Description Stage Count Percent 8748 0% Boeing 747-800 3 2 0% DC10 101.8 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 162 0.5% B744 101.6 Boeing 747-400 3 65 0.2% DC9Q 98.1 McDonnell Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3 3 790 2.2% B72Q 97.6 Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3 3 6 0% B777 96.2 Boeing 777 3 2 0% DC8Q 95.7 McDonnell Douglas DC8 Re -manufactured 3 101 0.3% A330 95.6 Airbus Industries A330 3 132 0.4% MD11 92.8 McDonnell Douglas MD11 3 66 0.2% B767 92.1 Boeing 767-200 3 439 1.2% MD80 91.5 McDonnell Douglas MD80 3 1051 2.9% A300 91.5 Airbus Industries A300 3 2 0% B757 91.4 Boeing 757-200 3 2762 7.7% A321 89.8 Airbus Industries A321 3 146 0.4% 8734 88.9 Boeing 737-400 3 4 0% B738 88.6 Boeing 737-800 3 1609 4.5% B739 88.4 Boeing 737-900 3 12 0% A320 87.8 Airbus Industries A320 3 3298 9.2% 8735 87.7 Boeing 737-500 3 85 0.2% B733 87.5 Boeing 737-300 3 565 1.6% A319 87.4 Airbus Industries A319 3 2447 6.8% E190 86.9 Embraer 190 3 109 0.3% 87377 85.9 Boeing 737-700 3 756 2.1% CRJ 84.6 Canadair Regional Jet-CRJ 3 12591 35.1% MD90 84.2 McDonnell Douglas MD90 3 2302 6.4% A318 84.1 Airbus Industries A318 3 2 0% B717 84.1 Boeing 717 3 576 1.6% E145 83.7 Embraer 145 3 623 1.7% E170 83.7 Embraer 170 3 5133 14.3% E135 77.9 Embraer 135 3 6 0% J328 76.5 Fairchild Dornier 328 3 2 0% Totals 35846 Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100% due to rounding. NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS DC8Q are re -engined with manufactured Stage 3 engines and are classified as Stage 3 Manufactured as of January 1, 2008. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A -weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. 90 - 6 - Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Count Current Percent Last Year Percent' Stage 2 0 0% 0% Stage 3 796 2.2% 5.9% Stage 3 Manufactured 35050 97.8% 94.1% Total Stage 3 35846 - NOTE 1: Stage 3 represent aircraft modified to meet all Stage 3 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS DC8Q are re -engined with manufactured Stage 3 engines and are classified as Stage 3 Manufactured as of January 1, 2008. -The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented for the representative aircraft type during take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). -EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A -weighted decibels. NOTE 2: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. 90 - 6 - Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report July 2011 RWY, Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year " Count Last Year. P,ercent.= 04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 7 0.6% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 275 21.1 % 178 14% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 345 26.5% 312 24.6% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 2 0.2% 3 0.2% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 341 26.2% 483 38% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 299 23% 266 20.9% 35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 39 3% 21 1.7% Total Arrivals 1301 1270 RWY Arrival/ Departure. Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year Count Last Year Percent 04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 2 0.2% 1 0.2% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 256 31% 88 20.2% 12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 185 22.4% 129 29.7% 17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 113 13.7% 33 7.6% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 5 0.6% 2 0.5% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 105 12.7% 107 24.6% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 159 19.3% 75 17.2% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures 825 435 Total Operations 2126 1705 aum of mama 1. '—y—, , cyum -'u . ... ... .... Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 7 - 91 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report July 2011 (; pops t Paul ° j Q ° i "rKJir P IV r r t, z_ 6 9 r f!, r fr t i5 � � tty. r J ,, ` j •` _ is ..�,lt �` .i k � J 1�• 8Al2, un-9rg 1/ k a { RiPhfield i S' ° l a 1 jt ii , t ° 10 -1 11.1 rfim { ;4J9 1� �f r v i G,r.JPJ 4, Lt13L1 c i� BlQomingto diE }r Ea -an it l g . RwY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area. Count '; Operations Percent Last Year* ` Count Last Year Percent' 04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 6 0.6% 12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 260 21.7% 153 14.2% 12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 322 26.9% 266 24.7% 17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% 22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 2 0.2% 1 0.1% 30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 313 26.1% 398 36.9% 30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 268 22.4% 238 22.1% 35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 33 2.8% 16 1.5% 'Total Arrivals 1198 1078 RWY Arrival/ Departure Overflight Area Count Operations Percent Last Year* Count Last Year Per 04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 1 0.1% 0 0% 12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 235 31.4% 78 20.3% 12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 155 20.7% 107 27.9% 17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 108 14.4% 30 7.8% 22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 3 0.4% 2 0.5% 30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 94 12.6% 95 24.7% 30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 153 20.4% 72 18.8% 35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0 0% Total Departures ._ 749 _ 384 Total Operations 1947 1462 'NOTE: Due to flight tracking data enhancements, the air carrier operations counts for Last Year included in this report have been updated to reflect revised aircraft type counts. Please refer to the interactive reports at www.macnoise.com for detailed information regarding aircraft types. Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. 92 - 8 - Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 180 :160 140 120 CU 100 E 60 40 20 August 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Zn, LL:i� 'R -H <n 'R W-1 U, LCI U -I , > Time August 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations -i n-Qn - m +n r, -nn n m Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 -9- 93 Manufactured Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 3 Total Delta (DAL) 0 0 271 271 --Sun -Country (SCX) 0 0 162 162 US Airways (USA) 0 0 74 74 American (AAL) 0 0 64 64 Airtran (TRS) 0 0 62 62 UPS (UPS) 0 0 58 58 Frontier Airlines (FFT) 0 0 58 58 Southwest (SWA) 0 0 57 57 FedEx (FDX) 0 0 53 53 United (UAL) 0 0 37 37 Continental (COA) 0 0 6 6 Total 0 0 902 902 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 -9- 93 August 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Time AD Carrier 'Flight Number . Equipment Stage 3 DayS of. Operation Routing 22:30 A Sun Country 284 B737 M F SEA MSP 22:30 A Southwest 682 B733 M MTWThFSu TUS DEN MSP 22:30 A Sun Country 284 B738 M MTWThSSu SEA MSP 22:40 A Sun Country 246 8737 M MTThF JFK MSP 22:40 A American 531 8738 M MTWThFSSu MIA MSP 22:40 A Sun Country 246 B738 M Su JFK MSP 22:45 A Sun Country 258 8738 M MThFSu BOS MSP 22:47 A Frontier Airlines 1951 E145 M MTWThFSu MKE MSP 22:51 A Airtran 869 B717 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 22:51 A Delta 2062 A320 M Su DTW MSP 22:51 A Delta 2062 B753 M TWThFS DTW MSP 22:51 A Delta 2062 8757 M M DTW MSP 22:54 A Frontier Airlines 108 A320 M MTWThFSSu DEN MSP 22:55 A Sun Country 426 B738 M TWTh LAX MSP 22:55 A Sun Country 404 B737 M WSSU SAN MSP 22:55 A Sun Country 426 B737 M M LAX MSP 23:04 A Continental 1846 B735 M M SAT IAH MSP 23:05 A Sun Country 106 8738 M TWF LAS MSP 23:10 A Southwest 593 B733 M S LAS DEN MSP 23:15 A American 848 MD80 M MTWThFSu SAT DFW MSP 23:21 A Delta 780 A320 M MTWThFSSu SLC MSP 23:22 A United 726 A320 M MTWThFSu OAK DEN MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 396 8738 M M SFO MSP 23:25 A Sun Country 396 8737 M TWTh SFO MSP 23:34 A Delta 1568 738 M MTWThFSu LAX MSP 23:39 A Continental 1451 B739 M Su IAH MSP 23:40 A American 3731 CRJ M MTWThFSu ORD MSP 23:45 A Delta 300 MD90 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 23:49 A United 542 A319 M S MEX ORD MSP 23:50 A United 463 A319 M MTW ORD MSP 23:50 A United 463 A319 M Th LGA ORD MSP 23:50 A US Airways 58 A320 M MTWThFSSu CLT MSP 23:51 A Delta 2206 8757 M MTWThFSu SFO MSP 23:57 A US Airways 55 A321 M MTWThFSSu PHX MSP 23:59 A United 463 A320 M FSu LGA ORD MSP 00:05 A Southwest 648 8737 M MTWThFS SLC PHX MSP 00:10 A Sun Country 108 B738 M MF LAS MSP 04:14 A UPS 556 8757 M TWThF 04:24 A UPS 558 8757 M TWThF 04:54 A US Airways 50 A321 M MFS PHX MSP 05:00 A Sun Country 290 8737 M M SEA MSP 05:05 A FedEx 1718 MD1 1 M TWThF 05:10 A Sun Country 430 8738 M MTThFSSu LAX MSP 05:15 A Sun Country 398 B737 M MFS SFO MSP 05:15 A Sun Country 398 B738 M Su SFO MSP 05:16 A j UPS 560 MD1 1 M TWThF 05:18 A FedEx 2156 B757 M F 05:18 A FedEx 1156 B757 M TWThF 05:25 D Delta 2130 738 M MTWThFSSu MSP ATL 05:34 A FedEx 1407 MD11 M TWThFS 94 - 10- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 August 2011 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations Time AID Car . Her Number Equipmerit: Stage 3, Days ays of: Operation ' o Hng,. 05:40 D Southwest 189 B733 M MTWThF MSP MDW DTW 05:40 A Delta 1243 B757 M MTWThFSSu MSP FAI MSP 05:41 A Delta 892 B757 M MTWThFSSu PDX MSP —6-5--.45 D Airtran 738 B717 M MTWThFSSu MSP MKE 05:50 A Delta 1088 8753 M MTWThFSSu ANC MSP 05:52 A UPS 496 B757 M S —6-5.-53 —D —FedEx 2156 B757 M F Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 11 - 95 July 2011 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Total Nighttime Jet operations by Hour Airline ID Staqe :Type.: Count Air Transport Intl ATN 3 DC8Q 33 Airtran TRS ti B717 76 America West 11 3 A319 2 Airline ID Staqe :Type.: Count Air Transport Intl ATN 3 DC8Q 33 Airtran TRS 3 B717 76 America West AWE 3 A319 2 America West AWE 3 A320 31 America West AWE 3 A321 45 American AAL 3 B738 23 American AAL 3 MD80 28 American Eagle EGF 3 CRJ 33 Compass CPZ 3 E170 110 Delta DAL 3 MD80 3 Delta DAL 3 DC9Q 3 Delta DAL 3 A319 36 Delta DAL 3 B767 50 Delta DAL 3 8738 97 Delta DAL 3 A320 117 Delta DAL 3 MD90 124 Delta DAL 3 8757 210 FedEx FDX 3 B72Q 1 FedEx FDX 3 B757 19 FedEx FDX 3 DC10 39 Mesaba MES 3 CRJ 150 Pinnacle FLG 3 CRJ 143 Skywest Airlines SKW 3 CRJ 75 Southwest SWA 3 87377 34 Southwest SWA 3 B733 36 Sun Country SCx 3 137377 70 Sun Country Scx 3 B738 117 UPS UPS 3 MD1 1 17 UPS UPS 3 B757 38 United UAL 3 A319 12 United UAL 3 A320 56 TOTAL 1828 Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 93.9% of the total nighttime carrier jet operations. 96 - 12- Report Generated: 08/1012011 16:09 July 2011 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. July 2011 Nighttime Carrier Jet Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines i n•,zn n m to R -nn a m DAL SCX f1ES cpz ® FD`s.:. ® ...UPS., AAL El ELF:: ED ATN Airline 500 1, 1 Total Delta (DAL) 0 450 637 l 1 rt i 0 1 187 400 Mesaba (MES) —6--o 1 150 t Pinnacle (FLG) 0 0 Y 143 Compass (CPZ) 0 0 350 110 America West (AWE) 0 0 78 Q Airtran (.TRS) 0 0 76 76 Skywest Airlines (SKW) Southwest (SWA) 0 0 0 0 75 70 75 70 United (UAL) 0 i 5 68 vii J FedEx (FDX) 0 1 58 59 UPS (UPS) American (AAL) 0 0 0 0 55 51 55 51 American Eagle (EGF) 0 0 33 33 t 0 0 33 V Other 0 5 114 119 Total M— F GJV 1938 1 6,1 200 � i 1 150 G 1 1 1 � 100 Ja 4 t17 O Un O 11-. O LC-) O 4J U-) O LO O IR I17 O U O LL, O 1Ci <-, 111 O 1L! O LL7 O lLi �nj O 7i (2 7t O --1 In -y' T! J 7t G7 '` 4 i LL1 IfJ LL a ---1 -ri --i N s-1 O O O N N " 1 C1 O OO O f.} O C O O O O O O iV CV N CEJ CJ N O O G O O Time July 2011 Nighttime Carrier Jet Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines i n•,zn n m to R -nn a m DAL SCX f1ES cpz ® FD`s.:. ® ...UPS., AAL El ELF:: ED ATN Airline Stage 2 Stage 3 Manufactured Stage 3 Total Delta (DAL) 0 3 637 640 Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 187 187 Mesaba (MES) —6--o 150 150 Pinnacle (FLG) 0 0 143 143 Compass (CPZ) 0 0 110 110 America West (AWE) 0 0 78 78 Airtran (.TRS) 0 0 76 76 Skywest Airlines (SKW) Southwest (SWA) 0 0 0 0 75 70 75 70 United (UAL) 0 0 68 68 FedEx (FDX) 0 1 58 59 UPS (UPS) American (AAL) 0 0 0 0 55 51 55 51 American Eagle (EGF) 0 0 33 33 Air Transport Intl (ATN) 0 0 33 33 Other 0 5 114 119 Total 0 9 1938 1947 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 -13- 91 MSP International Airport Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations (a Remote Monitoring Tower 102 18- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events July 2011 IRIVIT 113 City Address Time >= 65dB Time >.= 80d13 Time >= 90clB Time, >= 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 15:33:40 00:01:23 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St 16:56:57 00:05:53 00:00:02 00:00:00 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 18:16:02 00:35:04 00:00:48 00:00:02 1 —3 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 17:31:49 00:11:41 00:00:09 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th SL 18:02:23 03:36:16 00:01:39 00:00:08 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 17:30:53 03:13:58 00:02:54 00:00:03 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 00:39:30 00:00:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 00-.18.39 00:00:13 00:00:00 00:00:00 —8 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:30:15 --00:29.58 00:02:10 00:00:03 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdo 00:06:10 00:00:01 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave'. 00:02:59 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:01:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 00:07:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 11:15:14 00:00:36 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 00:22:18 00:00:22 00:00:00 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 14:48:29 00:28:21 00:00:24 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:02:24 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 00:24:24 00:00:43 00:00:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 00:12:32 00:00:32 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:04:41 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:14:00 00:00 - :07 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 09:34:22 -- 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. �1.01.02 00:00:20 00:00:00 — 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 14:46:59 00:00:50 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 00:36:47 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 -60--.0000 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 01:21:24 00:01:17 00:00:04 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 00:15:18 00:00:26 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 02:01:02 00:00:41 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 00:02:37 00:00:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 03:29:10 00:00:31 00:00:00 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:03:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:00:29 --60.02.14 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 -0-0-.-0000 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:13:10 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 05:32:26 00:01:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 11:02:59 00:00:40 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:02:57 -60-00.39 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. -bo-.00.18 00:00:01 -60-00.00 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan — 3477 St. Charles Pl. — -- 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Arrival Noise Events 183:32:47 08:30:31 , 00:06:94 00:00:13 *Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1 -second leq levels. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 19 - 103 Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events July 2011 RMT ID city Address Time >!= 65dB Time >= 80db Time >= NdB Tim6.>= loodIB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 04:05:16 00:00:48 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 04:56:58 00:01:53 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 09:40:52 00:12:52 00:00:11 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 12:33:41 00:25:00 00:01:32 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 34:41:42 03:12:51 00:18:28 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 38:06:04 06:33:26 00:26:47 00:00:30 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 18:57:55 00:20:07 00:00:08 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 14:37:51 00:19:40 00:00:09 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:09:39 00:00:57 00:00:12 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:09:07 00:02:40 00:01:05 00:00:00.,l 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:11:03 00:01:31 00:00:20 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:04:39 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 07:09:29 00:02:17 00:00:05 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 06:16:06 00:06:53 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 10:33:27 00:08:48 00:00:08 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 07:01:21 00:27:07 00:02:26 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:24:57 00:04:36 00:00:35 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 09:20:57 00:11:03 00:03:19 00:00:05 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 04:19:04 00:04:15 00:00:22 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:56:24 00:00:48 00:00:00 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 02:07:04 00:00:13 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 01:18:43 00:00:02 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 16:38:03 00:34:31 00:02:22 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 04:22:55 00:02:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 05:06:12 00:00:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 03:57:42 00:01:34 00:00:11 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 13:12:28 00:12:18 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 13:15:14 00:04:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 05:23:45 00:01:50 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 22:33:27 00:43:58 00:01:22 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 01:46:12 00:01:47 00:00:05 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:35:45 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 02:00:58 00:00:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:46:22 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 02:40:07 00:02:04 00:00:01 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 00:55:52 00:00:44 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 01:53:19 00:01:29 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 04:01:44 00:03:41 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles Pl. 06:18:27 00:05:59 00:00:00 00:00:00 Total Time for Departure Noise Events 293:10:51 14:15:50 00:59:48.' 00:00:35 *Note: These time values and levels are based upon 1 -second lect levels. 104-20- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Arrival Related Noise Events July 2011 RMT ID City Address Arrival Events >= .65dB Arrival Events >=. 80dB Arrival Events >= 90dB Arrival, Events >". 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 4187 15 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 3932 106 1 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 3846 527 11 1 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 4054 180 2 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 3978 2962 41 1 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 4218 3458 102 1 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 140 6 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 74 1 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 110 29 1 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 112 87 — 1 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 6 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 4 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 25 0 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 30 86 12 0 0-- 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 71 9 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 3471 411 5 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 9 0 0 0--- 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 75 9 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 55 11 1 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 17 1 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 53 ----2539 2 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 2 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 225 4 0 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 3999 18 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 156 5 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 328 19 --- 3 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 52 4 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 503 15 0 0 29 Minneapolis. Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st.Ave. S. 9 --1033 1 0. 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 8 0 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 6 0 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 2 1 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 11 0 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 53 ---1756 1 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 15 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 2790 8 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 16 1 0 0 38 Eagan-- 3957 Turquoise Cir. 3 1 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles Pl. 1 0 0 0 Total Arrival Noise Events 45005. 7029 168. 3 *Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 -21 - 105 Departure Related Noise Events July 2011 RMT 1D City Address Departure Events >= 85dB Departure Events >= 80dB Departure. Events. >- 90.013 Departure Events >=' 100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 876 12 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1096 22 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 1973 120 3 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave, & 48th St. 2489 225 24 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 5968 1704 189 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 7197 3222 299 17 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 3421 230 3 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 2791 178 3 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 30 6 2 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 21 12 9 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 27 10 4 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 16 1 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 1581 34 1 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 1272 80 0 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 2087 124 2 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln. 1188 214 33 0 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 68 22 8 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 2329 88 31 2 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 982 44 4 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 181 12 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 555 6 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 299 1 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 3006 400 28 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 873 41 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 824 9 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 887 21 6 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 2749 145 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 2697 92 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S. 1107 18 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 3905 357 17 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 392 11 1 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 152 2 0 0 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 481 5 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 184 1 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 586 28 1 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 236 9 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 412 22 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 860 43 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 1350 84 0 0 Total Departure Noise Events '57148." 7655 668 19 " "Note: These counts are based upon Lmax. 106 -22- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#1) Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dIl3) 07/15/201112:34 Unknown UKN A 12R 89.4 07/26/201113:08 DAL258 8757 A 12R 88 07/15/201121:25 Unknown UKN A 12R 87.2 07/03/201115:29 DAL621 B744 D 30L 85.2 07/24/201115:22 DAL621 8744 D 30L 85 07/15/201118:03 DAL2108 8757 A 12R 84.9 07/06/201110:16 DAL1453 B767 D 30L 84.3 07/19/201110:08 DAL686 A320 A 12R 84 07/14/201110:35 DAL919 DC9Q A 12R 83.3 07/23/201114:05 DAL1242 8757 A 12R 83.3 (RMT Site#2) Frp-nnnnt Ave_ & 43rd St.. MinneaDOliS bate/Time Flight Number Air6raftType Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dI13) 07/09/201118:15 DAL2235 8757 A 12L 91.1 07/14/201111:19 DAL1 230 MD80 A 12L 87.3 07/19/201115:28 DAL820 DC9Q A 12L 87.2 07/15/20115:26 UPS560 MD11 A 12L 86.3 07/26/201114:02 DAL1 797 DC9Q A 12L 85.5 07/14/20115:09 UPS560 MD1 1 A 12L 85.4 07/14/201112:34 DAL2205 DC9Q A 12L 85.3 07/19/201113:19 DAL2393 DC9Q A 12L 85.2 07/26/201113:00 DAL923 DC9Q A 12L 85.1 07/14/20114:51 FDX1718 DC10 A 12L 85 (HM I Srteg:3) Wp.-,t Flmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis Date*/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/15/201112:35 Unknown UKN A 12R 100.9 07/26/201113:09 DAL258 8757 A 12R 97.9 07/23/201114:06 DAL1242 B757 A 12R 95.5 07/15/201118:03 DAL2108 8757 A 12R 95.2 07/08/201119:43 DAL40 B757 A 12R 94.9 07/15/201121:26 Unknown UKN A 12R 94.7 07/22/201120:51 DAL1 094 8757 A 12R 93.9 07/10/201111:36 DAL2116 B757 A 12R 92.8 07/24/201115:22 DAL621 B744 D 30L 92.7 07/26/201110:21 DA 1301 MD80 A 12R 92.4 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 23 - 107 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#4) Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis Date'/Tirrie* Flight Number Air6raft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway L,m*'ax(dB) 07/09/201118:15 DAL2235 B757 A 12L 96.2 07/05/20116:58 DAL2240 DC9Q D 30L 95.4 07/02/201117:31 DAL887 DC9Q D 30L 93.6 07/22/201116:09 DAL883 DC9Q D 30L 93.5 07/24/201115:46 DAL1012 DC9Q D 30L 93 07/28/201117:54 DAL887 DC9Q D 30L 92.9 07/20/201115:59 DAL958 DC9Q D 30L 92.7 07/21/201111:05 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30L 92.6 07/31/201114:18 DAL958 DC9Q D 30L 92.4 07/31/201120:54 DAL865 DC9Q D 30R 92.3 (RMT Site#5) 12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis Date/Time: Fligh,tNumber' ,, Aircraft Type Arrival/. Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/15/201112:35 Unknown UKN A 12R 111.7 07/23/201111:19 DAL881 DC9Q D 30L 99.1 07/29/201111:23 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30L 98.4 07/29/201115:23 DAL959 DC9Q D 30L 98.4 07/25/201110:18 DAL2106 DC9Q D 30L 98.1 07/24/201111:05 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30L 97.9 07/24/201115:21 DAL621 B744 D 30L 97.9 07/28/20116:50 DAL2240 DC9Q D 30L 97.6 07/19/20117:05 DAL919 DC9Q D 30L 97.5 07/21/201115:17 DAL621 8744 D 30L 97.5 (RMT Site#6) 25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis Da.te/Time., Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lrnax(dIB) 07/01/201120:59 DAL1331 DC9Q D 30R 104.5 07/25/201111:13 KFS725 B72Q D 30R 104.5 07/09/201.118:16 DAL2235 B757 A 12L 104.1 07/21/201115:47 DAL1012 DC9Q D 30R 102.2 07/06/201115:51 DAU 732 DC9Q D 30R 101.9 07/31/201114:07 DAL883 DC9Q D 30R 101.8 07/12/201113:58 DAL883 DC9Q D 30R 101.3 07/05/201120:00 DAL1331 DC9Q D 30R 100.9 07/17/201116:12 DAU 732 DC9Q D 30R 100.9 07/31/20117:42 DAL2240 DC9Q D 30R 100.7 108-24- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#7) IA/Pnt%A/nrth Avco & 64th St. Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure. Runway Lmax(dB) 07/12/201111:05 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30L 91.7 07/29/201113:55 DAE785 MD80 D 30L 91.4 07/21/201110:10 DAL2106 DC9Q D 30L 90.6 - 07/25/201111:32 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30L 89.4 07/20/201121:05 Unknown UKN D 30L 89.4 07/12/201122:11 UPS559 MD1 1 D 30L 88.9 07/21/2011 14:02 AAL I - 1616 MD80 D 30L 88.4 07/02/201115:18 DAL959 DC9Q D 30L 88 07/22/201113:51 AAL1616 MD80 D 30L 87.9 07/29/20117:48 DAL1 291 B757 D 30L 87.8 (RMT Site#8) I nnnfpllnxA/ Avp & 43rd St.. MinneaDOliS Dateffime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(O.13) 07/05/201120:01 DALI 331 DC9Q D 30R 93.3 - 07/24/201120:05 DAL1 331 DC9Q D 30R 90.5 07/25/201111:14 KFS725 B72Q D 30R 90.3 07/24/201110:26 DAL923 DC9Q D 30R 89.9 07/21/201111:46 DAL1 734 MD80 D 30R 89.7 07/28/201120:00 DAL1101 MD80 D 30R 89.4 07/28/20118:45 AAL1368 MD80 D 30R 88.9 07/12/201115:36 DAL1012 DC9Q D 30R 88.8 07/01/201112:42 AAL450 MD80 A 30R 88.8 07/08/20118:18 Unknown UKN D 30R 88.7 (FOA I 51teMJ) _q5:wafnnp qt & Hqrtfnr(i Avp-- St- Paul Date/Time 'Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lr-hax(dB) 07/15/20119:40 DAL861 DC9Q A 22 93.2 07/28/201112:06 DAL2330 DC9Q D 04 92.9 07/13/201115:43 DAL621 B744 D 04 92.5 07/31/201115:44 DAL621 B744 D 04 88.2 07/15/20119:22 SKW4798 CRJ A 22 87.8 07/15/20119:55 AAL1 038 MD80 A 22 87.7 07/17/201111:39 DAL2319 MD80 A 22 86.7 - 07/18/201115:53 DAL621 B744 D 04 85.3 - 07/10/20115:30 DAL1088 B757 A 22 84.9 07/17/201111:20 SWA448 B733 A 22 84.9 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 25 - 109 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#1 0) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type A,rriva I/ Departure , Runway Lmax(dB) 07/18/201115:53 DAL621 B744 D 04 99.2 07/31/201115:44 DAL621 B744 D 04 99.1 07/13/201115:43 DAL621 B744 D 04 97.4 07/02/201115:57 DAL621 B744 D 04 96.5 07/06/201115:37 DAL621 B744 D 04 96.4 07/11/201115:33 DAL621 B744 D 04 96.1 07/28/201112:06 DAL2330 DC9Q D 04 95.7 07/28/201115:57 DAL621 B744 D 04 95.5 07/28/201114:07 DAL883 DC9Q D 04 92.9 07/15/20119:56 AAL1038 MD80 A 22 91.1 (RMT Site#1 1) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul Date/Ti,rne FlightNumberAircraft Type. Arrival/ Departure Runway* Lmax(dB) 07/02/201115:57 DAL621 B744 D 04 94.9 07/06/2011 15:37 DAL621 B744 D 04 93.8 07/28/201115:58 DAL621 B744 D 04 93.3 07/11/201115:33 DAL621 B744 D 04 91 07/28/201114:08 DAL883 DC9Q D 04 87.3 07/18/201115:53 DAL621 8744 D 04 83.2 07/29/201115:27 DAL2299 B757 D 04 82.3 07/26/20116:57 BMJ48 BE65 D 30R 81.4 07/13/201115:43 DAL621 B744 D 04 80.9 07/31/201115:30 DAL2299 8757 D 04 80.8 (RMT Site#12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul Da.teffirne.: Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/26/201115:20 MES2616 SF34 D 12L 84.9 07/14/20116:55 BMJ70 BE65 D 12L 76.6 07/14/20116:43 BMJ48 BE65 D 12L 75.5 07/11/201115:33 MES2608 UKN A 30R 75 07/23/201116:12 DAL220 8767 D 12R 74.4 07/27/20116:57 BMJ72 BE65 D 12L 72.6 07/15/201116:45 MES2653 SF34 D 12L 72 07/14/20116:47 BMJ72 BE65 D 12L 71.2 07/17/201113:39 N79123 LP38 D 12L 71.1 07/30/201114:48 MES2539 SF34 D 12L 70.7 110-26- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT S ite#1 3) .qni ithp;q.-,t Pnd of Whimn Court. Mendota Heiahts Datel-rime Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/15/201111:27 RPA3256 E170 D 12L 94.8 07/09/20119:25 Unknown UKN D 12L 86.6 07/04/201122:30 CPZ5735 E170 D 12R 85.5 07/14/20117:11 DAL913 MD80 D 12L 84.7 07/27/201110:41 DAL881 MD80 D 12L 84.6 07/07/201110:29 DAL881 MD80 D 12L 84.2 07/27/201112:21 DAL1 734 MD80 D 12L 83.9 07/04/201122:29 CPZ5692 E170 D 12L 83.7 07/14/2011 - 11:32 AAL2329 MD80 D 12L 83.2 07/23/201119:26 DAL1101 MD80 D 12L 83.1 (RMT Site#14) I. -,t St- & M( -,Kee St.. Eaaan Date[Time Flight Number Airc.raft.Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lrnax(c[B), 07/10/201115:36 DAL1012 DC9Q D 12R 88.6 07/06/201113:01 CPZ5753 El 70 A 30L 87.8 07/20/20116:42 DAL2240 DC9Q D 12R 87.6 07/01/201111:36 FLG3941 CRJ A 30L 87.2 07/29/201113:15 CHQ5888 E145 A 30R 87.2 07/26/201115:20 DAL621 B744 D 12R 87.2 07/15/20116:56 BMJ58 SW4 D 12L 86.3 07/28/20112:36 N81AX LJ25 D 12R 85.9 07/27/201115:49 DAL621 B744 D 12R 85.7 07/09/201117:37 DAL887 DC9Q D 12R 85.7 (HM I 6itelt1 b) Callon St. & Lexinaton Ave.. Mendota Heiqhts- Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/19/201120:08 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 92.9 07/15/201122:09 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 92 07/15/201115:45 DAL929 MD80 D 12L 89.1 07/14/201120:31 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 88.3 07/19/201120:56 DAL1331 DC9Q D 12L 88.3 07/27/201110:24 DAL923 DC9Q D 12L 87.8 07/22/201119:56 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 87.1 07/30/201111:47 DAL820 DC9Q D 12L 86.9 07/22/201120:03 DAL1 331 DC9Q D 12L 86.6 07/04/201111:50 DAL820 DC9Q D 12L 85.9 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 27 - 111 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#1 6) Avalon Ave. & Vilas Ln., Eagan Dateffirne Flight Number Aircraft .Type Arrival/ Departure, Runway Lmax(d,B) 07/08/201110:22 DAL784 8757 A 30L 96.3 07/01/201123:24 DAL2062 8757 A 30L 95.9 07/11/201113:23 DAL2214 B757 A 30L 95.8 07/09/201111:10 DAL2330 DC9Q D 12R 94.3 07/30/201111:27 DAL2330 DC9Q D 12R 94.2 07/13/201111:22 DAL2330 DC9Q D 12R 94.2 07/07/201111:18 DAL2330 DC9Q D 12R 94.1 07/07/2011 15:31 DAL1012 DC9Q D 12R 93.6 07/13/201115:11 DAL959 DC9Q D 12R 93.6 07/10/201114:11 DAL958 DC9Q D 12R 93.5 (RMT Site#1 7) 84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington Date/Tirn*d' Flight Nurnber, Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure. Rurlw'ay,: Lmax(dB) 07/12/201115:35 DAL621 B744 D 22 95.5 07/07/201115:27 DAL621 B744 D 22 93.8 07/14/201115:35 DAL621 B744 D 22 93.4 07/29/201116:16 DAL621 B744 D 22 93.4 07/01/201113:59 DAL1832 DC9Q D 22 93.1 07/01/201114:17 DAL958 DC9Q D 22 91.5 07/01/201115:55 DAL621 B744 D 22 90.6 07/17/201115:52 DAL621 B744 D 22 90.1 07/23/201115:57 DAL621 B744 D 22 89.5 07/09/201115:40 DAL621 B744 D 22 89.3 (RMT Site#1 8) 75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfield 'Date/Tirpe. Flight. Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway... Lm;ix(dB) 07/22/201115:33 DAL621 B744 D 22 100.7 07/17/201113:29 Unknown UKN D 22 100.7 07/16/201117:49 DAL621 B744 D 22 99.9 07/19/201115:43 DAL621 B744 D 22 99.4 07/20/201116:03 DAL621 B744 D 22 99 07/10/201115:38 DAL621 B744 D 22 98.8 07/04/201115:38 DAL621 B744 D 22 98.5 07/09/201115:40 DAL621 8744 D 22 98.2 07/23/201115:57 DAL621 B744 D 22 98.1 07/07/201115:26 DAL621 B744 D 22 98 112-28- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#1 9) 1Rth Avi- & 84th St- Bloominaton Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/16/201117:49 DAL621 B744 D 22 96.1 07/17/201113:29 Unknown UKN D 22 95.4 07/30/2011 15:37 N671 US 8744 D 22 91.9 07/15/201111:15 ASQ4889 CRJ A 12L 90.8 07/04/201115:38 DAL621 B744 D 22 90.2 07/10/201111:20 DAL2330 DC9Q D 22 89.3 07/10/201115:38 DAL621 B744 D 22 88.7 07/25/20118:42 FLG3756 CRJ A 35 88.2 07/12/201115:35 DAL621 B744 D 22 85.6 07/07/201115:27 DAL621 B744 D 22 85.6 (RMT Site#20) 75th St- & 3rd Ave-- Richfield Dateffirrie:- Flight Numbei. r Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(d6) 07/06/201115:19 Unknown UKN A 35 87.8 07/06/20116:32 MTN8553 ATR D 17 86.7 07/20/201116:03 DAL621 B744 D 22 86.4 07/20/201116:31 DAL2299 B757 D 22 83.3 07/11/201122:38 MES2436 SF34 D 30L 82.3 07/13/20118:06 FLG4203 CRJ D 30L 82.1 07/20/201116:16 DAL220 B767 D 22 82 07/18/201115:22 MES2701 CRJ D 30L 81.3 07/25/201113:20 Unknown UKN D 30L 81.1 07/26/20115:56 SWA189 B733 D 30L 81 (RM I sitelt2l) R2rhara Ave- & 67th St.. Inver Grove Heiqhts Date/Time, Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/29/201116:05 SKW4598 CRJ A 30R 87 07/07/201111:38 MES2607 CRJ D 12L 85.4 07/11/201115:23 Unknown UKN A 30R 82.6 07/27/201115:50 DAL621 8744 D 12R 81.8 07/09/201115:48 SKW4534 CRJ D 12L 81.3 07/27/201114:19 DAL958 DC9Q D 12R 80.6 07/14/201111:49 DAL820 DC9Q D 12L 80 07/30/201119:55 DAL1 331 DC9Q D 12L 80 07/30/201111:09 DAL913 MD80 D 12R 79.7 07/14/20117:12 DAL913 MD80 D I 12L 79.3 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 -29- 113 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#22) Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heiqhts Date/Time. Flight Nurp bet Aircraft Type Arrival/' Departure Runway Lrna5,(dB) 07/10/201123:53 JZA7953 CRJ A 30R 85.2 07/20/201113:10 DAL258 8757 A 30L 82.8 07/07/201111:48 DAL820 DC9Q D 12L 82.5 07/13/201111:23 DAL2330 DC9Q D 12R 79.9 07/24/201112:03 DAL622 B744 A 30L 79.8 07/20/201120:27 CPZ5824 E170 A 30R 79.6 07/11/201123:59 DAL2206 8757 A 30R 79.4 07/26/201115:32 DAL1012 DC9Q D 12R 79.3 07/16/201111:17 DAL2330 DC9Q D 12R 79.3 07/07/201115:32 DAL1012 DC9Q D 12R 79.1 (RMT Site#23) End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota Heights (RMT Site#24) Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln., Eaqan Date./Time .:,Flight NUmber . Aircraft Typ6, Arrival/- Departure. Runway Ru'nway . Lmax(dB) 07/14/201120:30 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 95.7 07/22/201119:55 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 95 07/14/201120:02 DAL1 331 DC9Q D 12L 94.6 07/16/201119:55 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 94.4 07/30/201111:47 DAL820 DC9Q D 12L 94.4 07/09/20119:25 Unknown UKN D 12L 94.4 07/22/201120:03 DAL1331 DC9Q D 12L 94.2 07/15/201122:09 DAL865 DC9Q D 12L 93.9 07/27/201110:23 DAL923 DC9Q D 12L 93.9 07/23/201119:55 DAL1 331 DC9Q D 12L 93.8 (RMT Site#24) Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln., Eaqan Date./Time Flight Number, Aircraft Type ArrivalL. Departure: Runway . Lmax(dB) 07/09/201110:22 DAL2096 A320 D 17 89.1 07/01/20116:49 FLG3840 CRJ A 30R 88.9 07/22/20117:58 CPZ5699 E170 A 30L 87.1 07/09/201110:29 DAL544 A320 D 17 86.2 07/15/201115:40 DAL621 B744 D 12R 85.5 07/26/201115:20 DAL621 8744 D 12R 85.4 07/22/20118:04 DAL1025 A320 A 30L 85.1 07/22/201110:30 DAL1 508 B757 A 30L 84.8 07/18/20115:51 DAL2390 MD90 A 30L 84.7 07/16/201117:33 UAL267 A319 D 12R 84.2 114-30- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Top Ten Loudest. Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#25) Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdv Rd., Eaqan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/04/201120:50 AWE56 A321 D 12R 86.5 07/04/201120:49 AWE56 A321 D 12R 84.5 07/01/201120:00 DAL1012 DC9Q A 30L 83.6 07/22/201119:39 DAL685 MD80 D 12R 82.7 07/01/201120:00 DAL1012 DC9Q A 30L 82.7 07/04/201122:03 CPZ5819 E170 D 12R 82.6 07/30/201115:48 N765NC DC9Q D 12R 82.3 07/01/201120:01 DAL1012 DC9Q A 30L 81.5 07/04/201115:40 DAL621 8744 D 22 81.4 07/02/201112:07 DAL259 A330 A 30L 81.2 (RMT Site#26) F)796 Arkqn.-,2.-, Ave- W- Inver Grove Heiahts Date./Time Flight Number Aircraft T Type Arrival/ Departure Runway, Lrnax(dB).. 07/03/201122:37 DAL2065 MD90 D 12R 99.3 07/03/201122:36 DAL2065 MD90 D 12R 98.5 07/02/201118:35 DAL265 8767 A 30L 95.7 07/02/201122:47 DAL2034 B738 A 30R 94.7 07/03/201122:29 DAL2155 A320 D 12R 93.5 07/03/201122:28 DAL2155 A320 D 12R 92.3 07/03/201122:27 DAL2109 B757 D 12R 92 07/03/201122:28 DAL2155 A320 D 12R 91.3 07/16/20115:03 FDX1407 DC10 A 30L 90.2 07/03/201122:14 MES2661 CRJ D 12R 89.5 (HM I 6iteY2/) Anthonv School 5757 Irvina Ave. S., Minneapolis Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway I max(dB) 07/15/201112:03 DAL1496 B738 A 12R 89.4 07/04/201122:04 TRS871 8717 A 12R 89.2 07/21/201112:53 DAU 420 MD80 D 30L 87.9 07/13/20117:21 DAL919 DC9Q D 30L 87.9 07/18/201113:26 DAL1420 MD80 D 30L 87.9 07/28/201111:20 DAL1 979 MD80 D 30L 87.9 07/24/201113:46 DAL785 MD80 D 30L 87.7 07/08/201113:29 DAL785 MD80 D 30L 87.7 07/18/201119:35 DAL1101 j MD80 D 30L 87.5 07/12/201116:00 DAL789 I MD80 D 30L 87.5 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 -31 - 115 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#28) 6645 16th Ave. S., Richfield Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure. :Runway Lmzix(dB) 07/05/201115:39 MES2635 CRJ D 30L 89.9 07/06/201120:37 FDX2681 B72Q D 30L 88.1 07/02/20117:17 DAL919 DC9Q D 30L 88.1 07/05/20117:15 DAL919 DC9Q D 17 85.6 07/04/201122:40 SCX246 B7377 A 12R 85.3 07/24/201115:46 DAL1012 DC9Q D 30L 84.9 07/14/201110:16 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 84.2 07/07/201116:22 DAL1 763 B757 A 12L 84.1 07/19/201112:54 DAL1 734 MD80 D 17 84 07/11/201115:05 TRS1438 B717 A 35 84 (RMT Site#29) Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S., Minneapolis DateiTinie Fligfit'Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure 'Runway max(dB) 07/25/201111:30 AAL2329 MD80 D 30R 86.8 07/07/20117:53 AAL1368 MD80 D 30R 85.6 07/01/201119:01 AAL1235 MD80 D 30R 85.2 07/01/201117:47 MES2632 SF34 D 30R 85.2 07/12/201110:29 DAL923 DC9Q D 30R 84.4 07/03/201114:19 AAL2341 MD80 D 30R 84.3 07/10/20117:42 FDX420 DC10 D 30R 83.5 07/02/20117:59 AAL1368 MD80 D 30R 83.2 07/03/20117:51 AAL1368 MD80 D 30R 82.6 07/18/201118:06 AAL1235 MD80 D 30R 82.5 (RMT Site#30) , 8715 River RidQe Rd., Bloominaton Date/Time. Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway. Lrnax(dB) 07/17/201113:29 Unknown UKN D 22 96.3 07/05/20117:16 DAL919 DC9Q D 17 94.1 07/10/201111:20 DAL2330 DC9Q D 22 93.9 07/14/20117:10 DAL919 DC9Q D 17 93.4 07/13/201114:24 DAL958 DC9Q D 17 92.6 07/26/201115:21 DAL959 DC9Q D 17 92.3 07/19/201116:48 DALI 732 DC9Q D 17 91.9 07/07/20116:44 DAL2240 DC9Q D 17 91.1 07/26/20116:47 DAL2240 DC9Q D 17 91 07/14/201115:29 DAL959 DC9Q D 17 90.9 116-32- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#31) 9501 12th Ave. S.. Bloominaton Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft, Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/19/201115:44 DAL621 B744 D 22 91.2 07/13/201114:09 N260CC C208 D 17 89.5 07/10/201115:38 DAL621 8744 D 22 88.8 07/23/201115:57 DAL621 B744 D 22 88 07/30/2011 15:38 N671 US B744 D 22 88 07/09/20119:44 SKW4474 CRJ D 17 88 07/04/201115:39 DAL621 B744 D 22 86.7 07/16/201117:49 DAL621 B744 D 22 86.5 07/27/201111:15 N976AS MD80 D 17 82.6 07/09/201115:40 DAL621 B744 D 22 81.5 (RMT Site#32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S.. Bloomington 1)6teffirn6, Flight Number Aircraft Type — Arrival/ Departure R.unw6y. Lmax(d!3) 07/06/201115:20 Unknown UKN A 35 84 07/04/201111:06 DAL2330 DC9Q D 30L 81 07/26/201110:27 EJA827 C560 D 17 80.9 07/10/201119:03 AAL461 MD80 D 17 79.8 07/19/20116:50 FFT103 A319 D 17 78.6 07/01/20118:08 ATN808 DC8Q D 17 78.4 07/05/20117:17 DAL919 DC9Q D 17 78.2 07/27/201111:15 N976AS MD80 D 17 77.4 07/19/20118:26 UAL817 _MD80 A320 D 17 77.4 07/26/20116:46 FFT103 A320 D 17 773 (RMT Site#33) North River Hills Park. Burnsville Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/20/201115:42 DAL789 MD80 D 17 81.9 07/10/201115:19 DAL959 DC9Q D 17 81.5 07/26/201115:22 DAL959 DC9Q D 17 81.1 07/20/201114:05 AAL1616 MD80 D 17 80.8 07/27/20119:47 SKW4474 CRJ D 17 80.4 07/23/201113:46 AAL1616 MD80 D 17 79.8 07/09/201115:41 DAL621 8744 D 22 79.5 07/25/201114:10 AAL1616 MD80 D 17 79.4 07/04/201117:50 DAL961 MD80 D 17 79 9:01 AAL483 MD80 D 17 78.4 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 33 - 117 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#34) Red Oak Park, Burnsville Da.te/Time' Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure. Runway Lmax(dB) 07/01/201121:19 DALI 246 A319 A 35 85.5 07/13/201116:44 AAY5133 MD80 D 17 83.6 07/20/201110:13 DAL2106 DC9Q D 17 78.6 07/18/201117:47 UAL619 A319 A 35 78 07/20/201114:05 AAL1 616 MD80 D 17 78 07/22/201112:26 N47SM C550 A 30L 77.8 07/18/201123:27 EGF4649 CRJ A 35 77.1 07/20/201115:42 DAL789 MD80 D 17 77.1 07/17/201115:22 DAL929 MD80 D 17 76.3 07/08/20116:49 N785NC DC9Q D 17 76.2 (RMT Site#35) 2100 Garnet Ln., Eaqan :.i,Date/Time Flight Nurnber Airdraft.Tvpe Arriva'U_.'', Departure, Runwa . y I-rilax(M) 07/13/201115:58 Unknown UKN D 17 90.3 07/16/201114:44 DAL2322 A320 D 17 89.6 07/06/201115:23 MES2435 CRJ A 35 88.3 07/18/201112:17 AAL450 MD80 A 35 87.8 07/18/201115:28 Unknown UKN A 35 87.6 07/31/2011 15:53 CPZ5813 E170 A 35 87.5 07/03/201120:09 CPZ5786 E170 D 17 87.3 07/08/201117:18 ASA38 B738 A 35 86.6 07/18/201111:44 MES2633 CRJ A 35 86.2 07/15/201111:18 CPZ5766 E170 A 12L 85.9 (RMT Site#36) Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, Apple Valley ljateffime` . Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure, ..R(mway Lrnax(dIl3) 07/07/20116:51 DAL1 981 A319 D 17 88.8 07/20/201110:50 MES2463 CRJ D 17 88 07/01/201121:19 DAL1 246 A319 A 35 87.6 07/07/20118:06 DAL981 A320 A 35 86.1 07/22/201113:02 CPZ5743 E170 A 35 84 07/08/201115:06 TRS873 B717 A 35 83.9 07/12/20116:43 DAL783 B757 D 17 83.8 07/20/201110:25 RPA3251 E170 D 17 81.6 07/20/201114:06 MES2639 CRJ D 17 81.6 07/17/201115:59 DAL789 MD80 D 17 81.3 118-34- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP July 2011 (RMT Site#37) 4299 Wnndnate Ln. N.. Eaaan Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmlax(dB) 07/06/201122:03 FDR1 618 DC10 D 17 86.8 07/19/201110:34 MES2447 CRJ D 17 86.4 07/27/20118:09 DAL1464 MD90 D 17 86.1 07/27/201114:21 DAL785 MD80 D 17 85.5 07/27/201112:57 DAL1420 MD80 D 17 84.4 07/15/201111:18 CPZ5766 E170 A 12L 83.6 07/16/201118:10 DAL1 799 MD80 D 17 83.3 07/13/201115:26 MES2702 CRJ D 17 82 07/27/20117:52 AAL1 368 MD80 D 17 81.9 07/26/201114:00 DAL785 MD80 D 17 81.8 (RMT Site#38) 3957 Turquoise Cir.. Eaaan Date/Time, Flight Number, Aircraft Type Arrival/ Departure Runway Lmax(dB) 07/26/201114:00 DAL785 MD80 D 17 86.9 07/26/201112:42 DAL1420 MD80 D 17 86.5 07/10/201112:53 DAL1420 MD80 D 17 86.4 07/14/201115:58 DAL789 MD80 D 17 85.7 07/10/201113:42 DAL785 MD80 D 17 85.4 07/09/201112:39 DAL1 979 MD80 D 17 85.4 07/27/201112:56 DAL1420 MD80 D 17 85]� 07/22/201119:35 DAL1101 MD80 D 17 84.9 07/19/20119:04 AAL483 MD80 D 17 84.9 07/26/201115:45 DAL789 MD80 D 17 1 84 (RMT Site#39) 3477 St- Charles Pl.. Eaaan DatejTime* Flight.Number Aircraft Type :Arrival/ Departure, Runway Lma.x(dB) 07/14/201113:16 DAL931 A320 D 17 87.4 07/09/201120:13 CPZ5840 E170 D 17 86.9 07/17/201113:30 Unknown UKN D 22 86.6 07/09/201120:13 CPZ5840 E170 D 17 86.6 07/15/201117:08 AAL2329 MD80 D 17 86.3 07/04/201111:44 DAL1734 MD80 D 17 86 07/17/201118:03 AAL1235 MD80 D 17 85.5 07/14/201115:39 DAL920 MD80 D 17 85.4 07/09/201114:46 DAL1 781 7 85.4 07/26/201114:22 �EA�AL2341 MD80 D 1 17 85.3 July 2011 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for July 2011 were comprised of 77.4% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the DC9Q with 27.4% of the highest Lmax events. July 2011 Technical Advisor Report Notes Unknown fields are due to unavailability of multilateration flight track data. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 - 35 - 119 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL July 2011 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #It #2 #3 #4 #61 #7 #8, #9 #10 1 #11 #12 #13, #14 #15 07/01/2011 57.3 60.7 62.3 64 70.5 72 60.6 58.6 34.2 29.3 35.5 NA 43.6 flNA 58.9 46.5 07/02/2011 51.5 53.5 56.8 60 67.4 69.2 61 58.9 32.7 54 52.9 NA 56.5 41.9 07/03/2011 53.6 54.6 59.6 57.5 65.8 68.4 56.4 57.3 25.4 NA NA NA 56 56 59.1 07/04/2011 55.4 58.7 61.9 59.2 66.8 68.7 57.1 56.5 NA NA NA NA 55.7 59.7 60.7 07/05/2011 55.4 57.4 59.8 65.5 68.5 70.3 61.8 58.3 NA 41.7 40.3 28.7 42.1 58.5 44.4 07/06/2011 54.5 54.7 59.7 61.9 68.7 70.5 59 59.7 35.9 54.1 52.1 NA. 56.2 58.7 56.9 07/07/2011 56.4 60.3 60.5 61 65.4 69.2 55.6 55.9 38.5 NA NA 26 52.2 58.1 60.4 07/08/2,011 54.51 54.61 60.7 59.6 67.1 68 157.6 57.7145.21 NA 27.91 NA 54.9 58.1 58.11 07/09/2011 57.3 59.7 64.4 60.2 68.4 66.3 44.3 30 1 NA I NA NA I NA 58 160.2 60.9 07/10/2011 57.6 59.2 63.8 60.3 67.7 67 51.4 51.3 55.6 58.2 NA NA 54.1 58.5 55.6 07/11/2011 56.4 59.4 60.9 61.2 68.7 70.3 62.8 58.6 39.2 54.5 48.7 38.2 38.8 57.6 47.7 07/12/2011 57.3 58.8 61.2 63.6 69.2 72.4 64.3 61.5 33.2 NA 40.2 NA 31.1 58.4 42.7 07/13/2011 57.8 60.7 63.3 64.1 68.7 68.9 56.3 56.5 52.3 54.8 42.5 NA 57.1 58.1 59.8 07/14/2011 60.9 65.1 65.8 65.4 69.1 1 70.8 48 48.4 47.7 43.6 44.4 51.1 59.2 58.5 63.2 07/15/2011 59.8 63.3 66.8 64.2 71.7 69.9 42.2 48.7 56.2 58 46 29.5 60.9 61.3 65.7 07/16/2011 57.2 59.7 63.7 60.2 68.1 66.1 48.5 39.1 30.7 32.1 30.3 33.7 58.8 57.1 61.2 07/17/2011 55.7 60.7 60.5 61.3 65.1 68.4 48.6 50.8 56.5 59.5 NA 29 56 59.4 60.7 07/18/2011 54.4 56.6 59.3 63 69.7 70.8 61.5 57.5 43.9 55.8 42.8 NA 35.6 53.6 41.8 07/19/2011 57.3 58 64.2 59.2 68.5 65.9 47.6 48 NA 24.3 NA 27.7 56.6 60.4 60.9 07/20/2011 57.71 56 163.1 60.5 69.1 69.6 58.3 57.8 NA 129.2 41.1 1 NA 49.4 60.3 50.5 07/21/2011 54.2 57 59.2 62.3 68.6 71.5 61,7 59.6 42.2 NA 43.9 NA NA 158.9 45.7 07/22/2011 55.3 58.4 63.7 61.7 70.6 69.6 57.5 56.5 33.9 39.1 27 NA 55.5 58.6 56.4 07/23/2011 57.6 58.8 64.9 60.4 70 69 60.3 57.7 46.6 50.3 41.7 35.6 53.3 59.2 55.9 07/24/2011 54.5 58.1 60.3 63 69.4 70.2 61.1 59.3 NA. 36.2 37.2 NA 56.2 58.2 60.5 07/25/2011 53 57.2 58.3 62.9 68.1 70.4 58.6 58.8 33.2 31.9 NA NA 55.2 59 57.2 07/26/2011 57.7 59 65 60.3 68.8 66.9 53.2 53.8 41.6 32 50.9 40.1 57.1 59.2 60.3 07/27/2011 48.5 59.9 58.8 60.6 59.1 66.9 52.1 46.9 44.9 45.7 NA 42.2 58.2 60.5 59.3 07/28/2011 52.8 53.8 62.5 60.6 70.4 69.5 59.8 58-8 50.8 58.2 53.2 NA 54.3 61.5 53.4 07/29/2011 53.4 54.8 60.6 62 69.6 69.6 58.4 58.1 NA 39.7 38.8 NA 56.1 59.3 58.2 07/30/2011 54.7 57 61.5 58.2 66.1 65.1 53.4 50 NA 32.5 37.5 40 51 56.4 54.7 07/31/2011 53.5 52 60.1 59.1 67.6 69.5 58.8 57.7 46.8 56.1 42.1 NA 46.4 58.7 60.5 .Mo.PNL 56.2 58.9* 62.4 6.1.9 68.6 69.4 58.6 56.9 47.7 52, 415 37.7 55.2 58.9-.58.8 120-36- Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL July 2011 Remote Monitoring Towers Date #16 #17 .#18 #19 #20 #21.1 #22 #23 #24,1 #25 #27 1 #28 #29 07/01/2011 66.8 56.2 63.1 54.4 48.5 42.6 56.2 55.9 60.8 49 53.5 58.2 56.3 51.5 07/02/2011 63.7 NA 31 37.3 38.6 30.2 54.2 37.2 57.5 40.6 57.8 58.1 55.8 54.1 07/03/2011 61.1 41.9 50.3 42 43.2 47.3 51.4 62.3 55.8 43.5 67.6 55.4 53.2 49.2 07/04/2011 62.8 48.1 56.5 51.8 42.7 47.9 52.6 64.4 57.7 52.3 54.4 56 57.6 44.2 07/05/2011 64.2 NA 48.9 46.4 44.4 32.3 56.7 52.4 58.5 52.6 45.7 56.9 56.6 52.1 07/06/2011 63.5 1 43.9 55.9 50.5 53.5 1 51.7 1 56 61.3 1 58.7 45.7 53.5 57.3 55.4 1 49 07/07/2011 64 152.9 60 54.5 42.8 47.8 54.8 62.6 57.8 50.9 51.7 51.3 57.21 51.5 07/08/2011 64.2 45.5 57.9 50.9 41.1 144.1 155.1 61.5 57.9 47.5 48 55 53.3 49.4 07/09/2011 62.1 49.3 57.5 48.5 36.8 53 151.8 64.9 58.1 52.5 55.6 31.5 48.2 33.3 07/10/2011 62.9 46 59.6 54.4 39.5 45.9 1 55.1 60.3 56.5 48.9 54.5 54.5 54.2 46.6 07/11/2011 64.3 30.9 50.1 47.3 50,9 40.2 57.4 50 58.5 36.3 49.2 58.4 56.5 52.7 07/12/2011 62.6 54 55.8 49 44.6 33.5 56.3 52.2 59.1 42.8 50.9 59.4 58.9 56.2 07/13/2011 63.7 45.3 58.4 55.4 48.7 50.6 53.6 63.7 57 54.5 53.3 50.7 59.1 43.6 07/14/2011 60.9 51.9 59.8 54.7 42.8 52.3 48.2 66.9 55.1 50.9 56.2 35.7 57.6 34.4 07/15/2011 63.1 37.3 55 50.1 37.5 51 52.4 68.4 59.4 NA 55.9 48.6 55.4 NA 07/16/2011 62.5 46 58.9 55.9 41.5 49.9 48 65.1 53.7 NA 56.8 34.4 53.6 38 07/17/2011 60.4 50.1 61.2 56.1 41.2 47 52 65.9 58.4 NA 56.9 42.9 49.6 39.8 07/18/2011 61.5 35.5 45.3 45 51.5 42.5 53.8 50.2 57.2 NA 47 58 55.2 51.3 07/19/2011 64.5 47.1 58.1 51.4 40.1 49.4 54.6 64.6 59.4 52.1 54.2 47.6 55.9 42.8 07/20/2011 65.3 46.2 57.9 46 50.5 49.2 57.3 57.9 59.1 50.4 56.9 52.1 52.4 51.3 07/21/2011 65.8 1 NA 48.4 45.9 43.3 43.7 57.8 43.4 60.1 40.4 47.6 58.9 55 55.6 07/22/2011 64.2147.8,58.8 47.8 44.7 50.6 1 55.6 63 1 58.9 49.5 54.2 1 56.8 53.7 1 48.7 07/2.3/2011 62.8 149.1 57.4 49.2 43.3 49.9 1 50.8 60.9 56.1 51 55.1 54.2 55.-9148.8 07/24/2011 63.5 29.8 28.9 25.6 29.4 49.4 54.2 62.3 577 47.2 52.7 56.1 55.9 52.1 07/25/2011 64.7 46.1 56.9 50.4 45 44.9 55.5 61.5 58.6 52.1 52.3 56.9 54.6 52.6 07/26/2011 63.5 48.5 57.3 54.3 51.7 50.4 54.5 63.3 58.5 55.4 53.5 52 58.5 43.9 07/27/2011 63.6 30.5 54.6 49.4 41.4 53.7 48.4 64.8 57.8 52.3 56.6 49.4 53.5 38.8 07/28/2011 66.4 1 NA 54.9 48 42.9 53.2 57.6 62.6 60.4 51.4 57.3 57.1 56.1 51.3 07/29/2011 64.8 52.4 56 53.4 40.4 1 50.9 56.2 62.7 59.6 50.9 53.6 57.5 54.6 . 49.6 07/30/2011 62.8 50.3 57.7 55.1 49.61 48.6 52.1 60.2 56.5 49.5 50 49 51.5 43.9 07/31/2011 63.8 46.1 58.1 53.2 46.5 46.4 54.1 61 58.9 44.5 49.5 56.3 51.4 52 Mo.DNL 63.8 48.4 1 57.3 1 51.8 46-5149.1 1 54.7 6.2.6 58.3 49.8 56.4 55.4 55,6 50.2 Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 -37- 121 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL July 2011 Remote Monitoring Towers Date, #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 1 #36 #37 # . 38 #39. 07/01/2011 58.6 41.2 41.5 41.7 45.7 54.2 56.5 NA 34.6 42.6 07/02/2011 46.8 NA NA 36.3 42.4 49.7 54 34.3 NA NA 07/03/2011 59.7 146.3 43.6 41.5 43.9 50.2 52.3 41.3 42.6 45.7 07/04/2011 60.4 48.2 44.3 46.2 38.1 50.3 47.2 46 50.3 53.6 07/05/2011 58.6 41.7 39.9 34.6 40.7 51.1 53.2 43.3 44.8 NA 07/06/2011 62.6 48.7 44.3 50.9 47.4 52.3 55.1 51- 48.5 37 07/07/2011 66.5 51 48.2 49.6 45.7 54.2 60.1 47 52.7 52.7 07/08/2011 65 48.4 44.2 *46.7 47.6 55.6 54.8 42.1 14.6.3151.2 07/09/2011 58 47.3 34.3 43 34.4 43.1 28 45.1 49.3 54.8, 07/10/2011 63.9 50.1 39.9 50.6 45.8 50.6 43.3 46.4 52 53.1 07/11/2011 61.2 45.3 38.3 46.1 40.3 54.7 55.9 37.2 NA 29.6 07/12/2011 62.1 41 42.9 45.7 49 57.4 57.9 42.3 NA NA 07/13/2011 65.9 53 48.1 52 50.2 52.3 45.9 52.4 54.1 54.7 07/14/2011 64.6 52.3 42.4 45.9 35 47.8 38.4 47.2 53.5 57.3 07/15/2011 60.6 43.2 35.3 47.2 37.1 46.4 28.1 44.4 46.8 54 07/16/2011 61.6 47.8 38.5 45.1 36.4 48.9 30.2 48.2 51.9 56.2 07/17/2011 60.7 41.6 35.1 44.7 38.4 48.2 47.3 44.3 49.6 52.4 07/18/2011 58.4 37.6 NA 39.9 46.9 56.9 56.9 35.8 NA 131.3 07/19/2011 63.1 52.2 49.3 45.3 44.6 54.3 49.6 49.9 50.8 53.5 07/20/2011 58.3 42.2 43.6 48.8 47.3 49.6 47.9 41.2 42.5 46.1 07/21/2011 63.2 30.5 NA 48 44.1 56.2 56.2 43.9 NA NA 07/22/2011 62 48.2 49 43.4 42.2 49.8 52.9 46.5 51.1 48 07/23/2011 60.3 50.4 41.3 45.5 39.3. 49.5 53 44.3 50.3 49.2 07/24/2011 -47 NA 33 NA NA 49.7 53.8 NA I NA NA 07/25/2011 61.3 48.1 43.2 41.5 39 56 54.8 42.6 NA NA 07/26/2011 66.4 50.6 51 50.4 50.6 52.5 51.1 50.3 53.4 54.1 07/27/2011 62 47.9 39.8 49.1 37.1 49.4 46.6 52.3 54.1 51.4 07/28/2011 63.1 45.2 44.9 48.1 46.2 50.7 54.4 43 42.1 NA 07/29/2011 62.6 40.3 43.4 41.6 44.8 54.3 55.5 40.5 42.1 52.8 07/30/2011 64.8 51.2 46.2 49.3 45.5 54.5 54.2 42 48.7 56.3 07/31/2011 54.8 45.6 39.2 45.1 46.6 52.4 53.8 36.7 38.4 44.1 MO.DNL 62.3 .47.8 44.1 46.9 44.9 52.8 53.7 46. 122 - 38 - Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:09 123 7/1/2011 - 7/31/2011 Eagan -Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport MP AN r F 3 l4 t t M \f R4, 41W'y� ,�jsi{ffJ T,2Fnr�v .,` �"y1ra„r s3igil;i� 'Ik .ase This report is for informational purposes only and cannot be used for enforcement purposes 123 Metropolitan Airports Commission 3683 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in July 2011 3492 (94.8%) of those operations remained in the Corridor 3683 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations ff 3492 (94.8%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for In Corridor Gate 7/1/2011 00:00:00 - 7/31/2011 23:59:59 3492 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 2047 (58.6%), Right = 1445 (41.4%) t 7 cry 11 . . .. ... 124 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:08 Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission 100 (2.7%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were north of the 090° Corridor Boundary during July 2011. Of those, 2 (®) returned to corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park \\ y. j�''zL;lar>tp ii J! Elloomlr(gton } Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate 7/1/2011 00:00:00 - 7/31/2011 23:59:59 100 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 4 (4%), Right = 96 r:' ..i Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights ueparture Lornoor /Analysts. Kepori venetaieu. vol 1 LJ//—U t , , V.VV 125 Metropolitan Airports Commission 91 (2.5%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were south of the Corridor (south of 30L Localizer) during July 2011. Of those, 5 � ) returned to Corridor before reaching SE border of Ft. Snelling State Park �e 4 ilyda f 13 It 149 LA "A . ......... 0 th •VN rt M :Ric' fiel' iK ig;; 1� ZYY PAR. 0: tk 00MI rig an J,� Paul 'Park, BI t' . ..... `**j`,,A A, 9N, I QI &OfaEi , 5 gfLi °, N" Q, A11 ik 0Twp , . k,'g� 'TA N vI -NO P w, n jp LAY" j Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for South Corridor Gate 7/1/2011 00:00:00 - 7/31/2011 23:59.-59 91 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 62 (68.1 %), Right = 29 (31.9% 126 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:08 Page 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission 38 -(1 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5° south of the Corridor (5° south of 30L Localizer) during July 2011 j� F E1 L+lyda n a f e i' i� bi. 77 Paul y t' n outh St. a I t€ t fts�ig:(u� cc�)1° t o 'IVe port � ichfielcJ IF l j U La L C 5, S nfish e 7.�. iLR �jr ft�7-.t�,�� b� li n "lft v s F i v F c; i I• I 3� +� _ �1 { 5t�iPaUI Par Gr~%� HeightsF E + i � N� /� � ?L7/,C./,.j.l�``��t �� y�� Tt YI� �I ✓ �� 1 �i f '1�F i S.. I ;, Grey, loud;EIsland Twp ,.. rngIrrrtC4,u` 7s f/ if -t` ` � �F osemo )nt l Minneapolis -St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for 5° South Corridor Gate 7/1/2011 00:00:00 - 7/31/2011 23:59:59 38 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 31 (81.6%), Right = 7 (18.4% 0 Page 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: U8/1U/ZU1'I 1U:U8 127 }/ ''- ( Metropolitan Airports Commission ` Top 15 Runway 12L/1 2R Departure Destinations for July 2011 _ 128 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: U8/ 0/2011 10:08 Page (deg.) Total Ops SEA SEATTLE 2780 138 3.7% ORD CHICAGO (O -HARE) 124- 99 2.7% FAR FARGO 3120 93 2.5% GFK GRAND FORKS 3160 89 2.4% BIS BISMARCK 2910 86 2.3% MOT MINOT 3040 85 2.3% CYWG WINNIPEG 3300 84 2.3% DLH DULUTH 190 84 2.3% CYYZ TORONTO 950 81 2.2% SFO SAN FRANCISCO 2510 78 2.16A RAP RAPID CITY 2690 72 2% DEN DENVER 2370 69 1.9% DTW DETROIT 105" 67 1.8% GRB GREEN BAY 900 66 1.8% PDX PORTLAND 2720 65 1.8% _ 128 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: U8/ 0/2011 10:08 Page 7/1/2011 - 7 /31121i Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport Y i 1 ..f i t "t f i This report is for informational purposes only and cannot be used for enforcement purposes 129 4796 Carrier Jets Departed Runway 17 - 7/1/2011 - 7/31/2011 Runway 17 Departure Overflight Grid Analysis 130 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 71112011-713112011. Report Generated: 0811012011 16:08 - 1 - all, ire Al a. 130 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 71112011-713112011. Report Generated: 0811012011 16:08 - 1 - Runway 17 Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 7/1/2011-7/31/2011 4786 (99.8%) Westbound Carrier Jet 10 (0.2%) Carrier Jet Departure Departure Operations flying the Runway 17 Jet Operations turned west before passing over the Departure Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn Runway 17 2.5 NM turn point. This is 0.6% of 1817 point) and Runway 17 eastbound Carrier Jet westbound departures Departure Operations _ � H � .i�! 1� �� 1 (i (.r� f,, if j �✓ (—i j r/ f � St Pau _ 1 �,.f �% j ,t `� J if d f �ji ° ✓ l� ✓ ✓fl_ ��1:' r'll �l, s 3 r t ` Y Mt eapolls / /� I c F c I yr - :,.f +�✓ ,� 1 `li i� jt � I'f v f � �t 'IN.�st St P�i�.........Z`t'1 1t t i iI✓r { ) flX } t tto 1`'10Uth Stl�ail /ul..!� 1 'Y71: ' R Ing (un) R+ehfield � h � r r r r ? Sunfish L n `" -.. � ��l , I�rl \ s 3 •� , {ia I / `t ii O f'iurrNay 17 35 2 5"' latrtic M)Ia Tur PIPE, � rt tiy,`^�•,��i�� •.1�„ I- r I �i Ta B�D(iTT1 1R 19 aX ik"�.+- t `I,.y 'xya� C �, z , r 2a I JI s ti+ i• r ,✓. Y!"1 �"` 'mrd ' y4 ✓ rk k 7, K. M 'l '^a— J.. s >• re'N. ,„V ..{i{ 5 t �1 -i`ff wt a I I y -i.3.. tct `.-r U� r 1 ...�'" •�-.,,,. I' "-4.it�-'1 r 5 � � •'r]. d it 7. � ; r tl"a iti � `s jF�.T Y s` 7.1�"� �`tdtY'y�r.+. �:. -ah.'i 11 v r� (.........Iz,it , 1 t i . t s �+- 1 ! t. , 1 zV, t. ( LF i --l-1:1-11111- .�}. .1 r I >• 1'at G }€° F{r T31G,tMnxa'-24 : s ) z . 1{� r SIS{^ Y`>, i t :1 I i W", !V= - 0 f,; Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 71112011-713112011, Report Generated: 08110/2011 16:08 -2- 131 2- 131 a Q. - 00 4 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 71112011-713112011, Report Generated: 08110/2011 16:08 -2- 131 2- 131 Runway 17 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations - 7/1/2011 - 7/31/2011 z– 'i" h Mi '.Ieapo jl "VER 7 4' "121 St. Pa, ": .4 it i t Xi, s;�JI�/ t �I [ j, obi mi 5 51 t y5 1t i1 2, 3 K;re INN IC A �A- I UZ:, R e rn 60' 'SR 108 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations off of Runway 17 in 7/1/2011 - 7/31/2011 (10:30 p.m. - 6:00 a.m.) 7 (6.5%) Westbound Carrier Jet�,' '—*-- 1 24 (22.2%) Westbound Carrier Jet Departures turned west between 2.5 and 3.0 NM Departures turned west after 3.0 NM from start of from start of takeoff and remained over the takeoff and remained over the Minnesota River Minnesota River Valley (trending with Runway 17 Valley (trending with Runway 17 River Departure River Departure Heading) Procedure) 0 (0%) Carrier Jet Departures turned 36 (33.3%) Remaining westbound west before passing over the Runway 17 2.5 NM Carrier Jet Departures flew the Runway 17 Jet turn point Departure Procedure (passing over the 2.5 NM turn point), and with an enroute heading to the destination airport 41 (38%) Other Nighttime Carrier Jet Departure Operations 132 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 71112011-713112011. Report Generated: 0811012011 16:08 - 3 - Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations . ......... qp 9, 9 A —Vest S.t.-Paul 7'=;-= 141) LU 110 th Si;.Pa tr .�-ie� Su fish Lak—' Richfield . .... . All ........... - X, . .... V.li it I L 202 h . . ...... E . . . . . . . . . . . � J1 j av� age emount-411 J I t LEGEND 13:"21 RA" Exi's ng PNIT's SK i Runway 17-35. RMTs Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 71112011-713112011. Report Generated: 0811012011 16:08 - 4 - 133 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Levels - QNL dBA 7/1/2011-7/31/2011 Date, #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 1 #36 #37 #38 #39 1 58.6 41.2 41.5 41.7 45.7 54.2 56.5 NA 34.6 42.6 2 46.8 NA NA 36.3 42.4 49.7 54 34.3 NA NA 3 59.7 46.3 43.6 41.5 43.9 50.2 52.3 41.3 42.6 451 4 60.4 48.2 44.3 46.2 38.1 50.3 47.2 46 50.3 53.6 5 58.6 41.7 39.9 34.6 40.7 51.1 53.2 43.3 44.8 NA 6 62.6 48.7 44.3 50.9 47.4 52.3 55.1 51 48.5 37 7 66.5 51 48.2 49.6 45.7 54.2 60.1 47 52.7 52.7 8 65 48.4 44.2 46.7 47.6 55.6 54.8 42.1 46.3 51.2 9 58 47.3 34.3 43 34.4 43.1 28 45.1 49.3 54.8 10 63.9 50.1 39.9 50.6 45.8 50.6 43.3 46.4 52 53.1 11 61.2 45.3 38.3 46.1 40.3 54.7 55.9 37.2 NA 29.6 12 62.1 41 42.9 45.7 49 57.4 57.9 42.3 NA NA 13 65.9 53 48.1 52 50.2 52.3 45.9 52.4 54.1 54.7 14 64.6 52.3 42.4 45.9 35 47.8 38.4 47.2 53.5 57.3 15 60.6 43.2 35.3 47.2 37.1 46.4 28.1 44.4 46.8 54 16 61.6 47.8 38.5 45.1 36.4 48.9 30.2 48.2 51.9 56.2 17 60.7 41.6 35.1 44.7 38.4 48.2 47.3 44.3 49.6 52.4 18 58.4 37.6 NA 39.9 46.9 56.9 56.9 35.8 NA 31.3 19 63.1 52.2 49.3 45.3 44.6 54.3 49.6 49.9 50.8 53.5 20 58.3 42.2 43.6 48.8 47.3 49.6 47.9 41.2 42.5 46.1 21 63.2 30.5 NA 48 44.1 56.2 56.2 43.9 NA NA 22 62 48.2 49 43.4 42.2 49.8 52.9 46.5 51.1 48 23 60.3 50.4 41.3 45.5 39.3 49.5 53 44.3 50.3 49.2 24 47 NA 33 NA NA 49.7 53.8 NA NA NA 25 61.3 48.1 43.2 41.5 39 56 54.8 42.6 NA NA 26 66.4 50.6 51 50.4 50.6 52.5 51.1 50.3 53.4 54.1 27 62 47.9 39.8 49.1 37.1 49.4 46.6 52.3 54.1 51.4 28 63.1 45.2 44.9 48.1 46.2 50.7 54.4 43 42.1 NA 29 62.6 40.3 43.4 41.6 44.8 54.3 55.5 40.5 42.1 52.8 30 64.8 51.2 46.2 49.3 45.5 54.5 54.2 42 48.7 56.3 31 54.8 45.6 39.2 45.1 46.6 52.4 53.8 36.7 38.4 44.1 Av. DNL 62.3 47.8 * 44.1 46.9 44.9 52.8 53.7 46.1 48.9 51.4 134 Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 71112011-713112011. Report Generated: 0811012011 16:08 - 5 - Aircraft Noise Levels DNL dBA 7/l/2011-7/31/2011 RMT Aircraft DNL. Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL Aircraft DNL ORD 07/01/08-07/31/08 07/01/09-07/31/09 07/01/10-07/31/10 07/01/11-07/31/11 30 63.8 62.5 60.3 62.3 31 47.8 51.9 46.9 47.8 32 45.9 44.6 42.1 44.1 33 50.4 46.9 45.9 46.9 34 45.8 45.9 43.6 44.9 35 55.3 54 52.9 52.8 36 54.3 54.9 542 53.7 37 49.3 47.9 45.4 46.1 38 51.8 50.1 47.9 48.9 39 52.1 49.5 50.8 51 A Top 15 Runway 17 Departure Destination Report 'Airport; city Heading (deg.) #Ops, Percent of Total Ops. ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124* 260 5.4% DEN DENVER 237' 238 5% ATL ATLANTA 149' 202 4.2% MDW CHICAGO (MIDWAY) 124' 191 4% MKE MILWAUKEE 114* 152 3.2%- DFW DALLAS/ FORT WORTH 193' 144 3% PHX PHOENIX 231' 115 2.4% IAH HOUSTON 185' 108 2.3% EWR NEW YORK 106' 107 2.2% -:S -TL I: ST LOUIS 160' 104 2.2% CVG CINCINNATI 127' 97 2% LGA NEW YORK (LA-GUARDIA) 105' 93 1.9% OMA OMAHA 205* 88 1.8% MCI KANSAS CITY 188- 88 1.8% PHL PHILADELPHIA 111- 86 1.8% Metropolitan Airports Commission Runway 17 Departure Analysis Report - 7/1/2011-7/31/2011. Report Generated., 0811012011 16:08 - 6 - 135 C July 2011 Crossing -in -the -Corridor Analysis Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport This report is for informational purposes only and cannot be used for enforcementpurposes 136 Metropolitan Airports Commission July 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Runways 12L & 12R (23:00 - 06.00) 147 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06.00 .... . .. ...... "!,N 41 az27 k liteUF XJ 1: , ii i 1, � '. '� ; kll- P F! JU �Ii ur N V ) 4 " !L 14U St baa it 'NiN 21KZ L vv'6 rM LIZ R' "t - 'L F—m z' Eiz N h M_ 17, kA imp 2*0 a Park WT5 4�f 10 t NN T 5", _69 vs 'j rte fi'l— Al. g 4 Er,,v 5ba—Aslan 4, _;jaTi QATit T-10A MN A le v bs Valle S� ":2 wl; IA 137 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:08 Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission July 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Performing the Crossing Procedure off Runways 12L & 12R (23:00 - 06:00) 98 (67%) Carrier Jets Crossed After Departing Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 23:00 and 06:00 -IV v N 7 H �,�bur V� N' 149 P'. !A 'd Uth St' Ra 4 (Lield' A{ 5Y T L nt1shA.a Ni'' M f . L Xv� ....... .... . jj V -�z T `� / �-� 'i tr�� `'�^�� v{{meq hS a01 Park 'jr, Ve V,; Eagan YV z" A A f Ail ! r 1E NtiV z pp"i.. I 7 e"Vq11 5 ey 4,� V o Al A fjk Page 2 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:08 138 Metropolitan Airports Commission Carrier Jet Departure Operations Runways 12L & 12R (06:00 - 23:00) 3536 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 06:00 and 23:00 MR.F`Iti1Ct�K�ytr 5i WK -F TEN F '5 S q KfM gNg:10 k' W/4P.1 Em"7, RL egz.1040 "is 4t� Ps5 .0,TE.- 1"i"o N"vW'EV 4g- , " p n 4 -kF g n gg hfid1d ter*ans H V11 I Pffl Y L� I m f r,;4fT Nct Tj A 1 411-4 W RON "N W 1N qn%034 f Z g 1W, gg- E Z :ter iFB100mi .R Ia at Rn ,ug �v Or -,T�7 A�V g atm ae�NN'5t Pa�tPa�re a 5- � Q V4: vs : - L�Q NO 0 - aa g in z L piA>_K . . . . . . ..... . . . . . Nm , Ht J_," .1-1 51 L 5 N p."g ,� IT . _ g q IN R, Q A: _111N ti 49 ggg 'xoyg -m, g YL S, W -�,r 4-gpL-g" m M4 6 Tg M=�i F, �e 'N' 0, "U"4—:3eg Ngg':N. Ef'RS", 1",.� "M Av R at, N 0i i �0 I J' Rim, Mn W C°. p 51- OU2 j��Np . A!�N p -.%r 8. E, 0, —tlZM I, — '. " WT zp� . .... X kgl IR N v: JFJ;g,� 0 'W -W- 139 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:08 Page 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission July 2011 Carrier Jet Departure Operations Performing the Crossing Procedure off Runways 12L & 12R (06:00 - 23:00) 1174 (33%) Carrier Jets Crossed After Departing Runways 12L & 12R between the hours of 06:00 and 23:00 .......... zz;�� MIR n 'm -A'Zpv_ R Ljj W .10- f 0", li N n'! A RM inti il P- 80- R g - TM. I ERAipd� L ,q +i 7 IR "NON --a gffl.rli �?I'iggg ga f "U.- - W if �v' t 'L i� "veL Fi 73, W, -54 g 4 -1,7 ig igR"%, AN MR, ,g F .t� --gg, RichTield j'� U-, x. N� SA 1�,MXMNV FIR n W g ..h 1F;;Zw� 1M1 4 7i�lkll_ I .. . ....... F m_,g (.71 g,� RIN A w 6 "t-4 R Blod.Tmj t -PQ R R. Y_k RQ �x ew" E ITS Cu X �5�-0, N IM �2 N, I.F "X lagan S 2 NS. Ils f AKNAAE 50 Av, L�'VN�I'j a I 23 ;NIAZ�� S j N. 'N PO W N P Page 4 Crossing in the Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 08/10/2011 16:08 140 J