01-14-2009 ARC Packet1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
91
N
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA
January 14, 2009 —City Hall Council Chambers
Call to Order - 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call
Approval of the Minutes from the November 12'', 2009 Airport Relations Commission
Meeting.
Unfinished and New Business
a. Meet with Representative Hansen to Discuss
® NWA/Delta Merger
® MAC/City Relations
® NOC Work Plan
® ANRC Letter
b. Updates for Introduction Book.
Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence:
a. MSP Noise News
b. October 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report
C. October 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report
d. November 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report
e. October 2008 ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
f. November 2008 ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
g. Airport Noise Report, November 7, 2008
h. Airport Noise Report, November 14, 2008
i. Airport Noise Report, November 28, 2008
j. Airport Noise Report, December 5, 2008
k. Airport Noise Report, December 12, 2008
1. Airport Noise Report, December 19, 2008
M. Airport Noise Report, December 24, 2008
Other Commissioner Comments or Concerns
Upcoming Meetings
MAC Meeting (Special)
City Council Meeting
NOC Meeting
MAC Meeting
Planning Commission
8. Public Comments
9. Adjourn
1-6-09
1:00 p.m
1-20-09
7:00 p.m.
1-21-09
1:30 p.m
1-26-09
1:30 p.m.
1-27-08
7:00 p.m.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than
120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be
possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at (651) 452-1850 with requests.
1.1 A bill for an act
1.2 relating to transportation; maintaining airline operations at Minneapolis -St. Paul
1.3 International Airport; enforcing certain contractual obligations and rights.
1.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.5 Section 1. PRESERVATION OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM.
1.6 Subdivision 1. Statement of purpose.. The legislature finds that the provisions in
1.7 this bill are essential to meet the transportation needs of the residents of this state and to
1.8 further the statutory goals of providing a balanced transportation system and providing an
1.9 air transportation system sufficient to encourage economic growth of this state.
1.10 Subd. 2. Contract enforcement. If, through merger or otherwise, an airline or its
1.11 successor serving the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport fails to adhere to all
�',r:i2 covenants regarding the maintenance of its hub, headquarters, and required employment
1.13 levels in the state of Minnesota, the Metropolitan Airports Commission shall use all
1.14 available means. to enforce the covenants and; if necessary, require repayment of all
1.15 outstanding bond obligations and surrender of previously granted rent reductions pursuant
1.16 to the terms of the covenants. The Metropolitan Airports Commission shall not enter into
1.17 any agreement to modify,. amend, or eliminate the covenants referenced in this section
1.18 without the agreement first being approved by law.
1.19 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective the day following final enactment.
Section 1.
SZ60-60 S?Udwf XOSIA9X 60/80/10
MAC trashes deal struck with Delta, Northwest; wants new one - TwinCities.com
MAC Tyre deal
with Delta, r;
wantsone
By John Welbes
jwelbes@pioneerpress.com
Updated: 01/07/2009 01:12:48 PM CST
A Delta Airlines jet takes off at Minneapolis/St. Paul international Airport
30 May, 2006 at the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. (AFP/Gett`
Images)
After months of negotiations, Northwest Airlines
officials learned Tuesday that a new legal agreement
for Northwest's operations at Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport won't get off the ground
anytime soon.
Northwest — now owned by Delta Air Lines — wants
out of commitments related to keeping its
headquarters in Minnesota. The Metropolitan
Airports Commission, which runs the Twin Cities
airport, wants Delta to commit to keeping a certain
level of operations and jobs in the state and locally.
YU VU U.U[1i 11 t
Page 1 of 2
Delta is based in Atlanta, where the merged airline
also will be based.
The renegotiated deal covers lease agreements,
promised numbers of daily flights, a schedule for
paying off bonds and which corporate functions will
be in the Twin Cities, and for how long — among
other things. But members .of the MAC weren't
satisfied, and they directed commission staff to
bring back another version of the deal later this
month.
"Are these deal -stoppers? I don't know that yet,"
said Tom Anderson, the general counsel for the MAC
who negotiated the revised terms commissioners
saw Tuesday. He noted that if Northwest simply
defaulted on the covenants of the original deal, the
airport would have less recourse than it would with
the newly negotiated deal.
The delay also rankled Northwest officials, who say
it puts off integrating Northwest's operations with
Delta's, and hurts employees who need answers
about their future.
Toward the end of the meeting, Ben Hirst, the
general counsel for Delta who led the airline's
renegotiation efforts, told the commission, we need
an answer now as to whether this agreement is an
agreement."
But he didn't get an answer Tuesday, and he can't
expect one until the commission meets again Jan.
26.
The tussle goes back to the early 1990s, when the
MAC backed borrowing by Northwest. That
agreement, and subsequent ones negotiated as
recently as 2007, gave the commission the power to
demand immediate repayment of some $245 million
in bonds if Northwest moved its Eagan
headquarters, as well as to revoke almost $12
t•,
ZIF
PrinterStitial® ads by Format Dynamics.
Fors a-Mynarrtice
Print Powered By tForina4J?i-...
http://www.twincities.com/business/ci_113 89457?nclick_check=l
1/7/2009
MAC trashes deal struck with Delta, Northwest; wants new one - TwinCities.com
million per year in rent reductions and revenue-
sharing from the sale of items like food and parking
at the Twin Cities airport, the nation's 13th busiest.
Delta would rather not pay the money back right
away. Airport commissioners are trying to extract as
much as they can out of Northwest's new owners
now, since their efforts to keep an airline
headquartered here have. failed.
To that end, Bert McKasy, a MAC commissioner, told
Hirst to expect changes to the reworked deal.
Language in the agreement says that several
functions of the merged airline — including
reservation centers, Delta's regional headquarters
and a pilot training center — will remain in the state
for at least three years. After that, those functions
could leave Minnesota if Delta decides to outsource.
The negotiations about the three-year guarantee for
certain corporate functions "was a very hard
discussion with Northwest," said Jeff Hamiel,
executive director of the MAC. "I support the
agreement and what we've done."
Yet commission members objected to the three-year
term. They also raised questions about whether
flight simulators located in Eagan would be
upgraded to reflect new types of aircraft that may
join Delta's fleet and the definition of some legal
language in the new agreement.
Hirst said the airline has little room for further
negotiation.
For example, Northwest currently employs about
11,500 people in Minnesota. The new agreement
would allow employment to slide down to 10,000,
as many airlines continue to downsize as the
economy slows. Hirst said the new Delta expects
eventually to end up close to that 10,000 figure in
Advertisement
11 t
Page 2 of 2
"Every word in that term sheet has been negotiated,"
Hirst told the commission.
Associated Press reports were used in this story.
John Welbes can be reached at 651-228-2175.
Print Powered By Wti IF( r-r-natDyn-amic.sW
http://www.twincities.com/business/ci_11389457?nclick check=l 1/7/2009
5 1 t {�li rt ^a{ �it.
�I,
1, �}A ?74�'SsZL
`�i.�'ahr
RF,1' tl
��""S''4E4t4t��`''i t 't
t*Nrr
Se r k"
f
rt
t'Mo. .
{y
p p a ppm US
a� , f ;ik53 '; u� 3�,(:i)r� in �..�3 �Si�� Ise Q�,.U�+�I S,San1� 2g
ON.� h�5e
PrinterStitial as by Format Dynamics.
�',.r, Uft
I r "
rbrmatDynamic§'
Print Powered By Wti IF( r-r-natDyn-amic.sW
http://www.twincities.com/business/ci_11389457?nclick check=l 1/7/2009
January 13, 2009
John McDonald
2358 Fieldstone Ct.
Mendota Heights, MN 55120
Dear Mr. McDonald:
ci ty of
Mendota Heikrwcb-ts
We would like to take this opportunity to congratulate you on behalf of the City of
Mendota Heights and the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission (ARC) for your recent
appointment as District G's representative to the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC).
We feel that you are immensely qualified to represent our district and are very grateful for your
willingness to serve.
The City and the ARC have enjoyed a productive and positive relationship with the MAC
and your predecessor, Mr. Foley. We look forward to working with you. Do not hesitate to call
on us when we can be of assistance.
Congratulations again on your appointment. We wish you the best as you take on these
new .responsibilities.
Kind Regards,
John Huber
Mayor
Liz Petschel
Chair, ARC
1101 Victoria Curve ® Mendota Heights, lei 55118 o (651) 1452-1850 a FAX (651) 1452-8940
www.mendota-heights.com
pgAFT
Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport (MS
Noise Oversight Committee (NOC)
2009 MSP NOC WORK PLAN
a. Review Residential Noise Mitigation Program Implementation Status
b. Update on Community Implementation of Policies on Residential
Development in the 64 to 60 DNL Noise Contours
�!ii I 111!�!i 1 11 ii q 1 11 i!l 1 11 Ina *4q I -111111111�!1:4 =01 :4 im
a. Runway 12L/30R Reconstruction Communication Plan
b. 2008 Actual Noise Contour Analysis
c. Implementation of Northwest Airlines Runways 12L, 12R and 17 RNAV
Departure Procedures
d. Implementation of Runways 12L, 12R and 17 Public RNAV Departure
Procedures
e. Evaluation of the Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) Procedure at MSP
f. Transition to New Flight Track Data Acquisition System and MAC Noise
and Operations monitoring System (MACNOMS)
g. Develop MACNOMS System Enhancement Plan
h. Review Status of FAA Center of Excellence/PARTNER Initiatives
i. Global Position System (GPS) SLS -4000 Ground Based Augmentation
System (GBAS) Installation
j. Annual Scheduled Nighttime Operations Assessment
k. Review of Aircraft Fleet -mix Trends at MSP following Delta Airlines'
Acquisition of Northwest Airlines
1. Monitor Ground Operations and Related Noise on West Side Ramp Areas
F-orm-can-Mttkj-jte-Noise—
n. Analysis of Runways 12L and 12R Departure Turns at Three Miles
o. Review of Runway 35 River Visual Approach Procedure
I vafwk eAct balle 0 -;P -5f -Y-9 V-Qr1VVj4 -
3. C6NTINUE REVIEW OF PUBLIC INPUT
a. Continue to Review Input Received from the Public Input Meetings as
Possible Agenda Items
i'�
December 11, 2008
Chair Jack Lanners
Metropolitan Airports Commission
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799
Dear Chair Lanners,
ci of
P y
Mendota
Since 1991 the City Council of Mendota Heights has been advised on airport and noise issues by
the Airport Relations Commission commonly known as the ARC. The ARC is comprised of
community members appointed by the City Council. We have had an excellent track record in
terms of being informed and up to date on airport operations and the technical aspects of noise
measurement and noise attenuation. We have also enjoyed an excellent working relationship
with the other communities surrounding the airport, FAA personnel, local legislators, and MAC
staff. I think we are viewed as a respectful, credible group.
As I am sure you are aware, there is a group of citizens in Mendota Heights that has referred to
themselves in the past as the Rogers Lake East Neighborhood Group. They are led by Guy Heide
and Mike Kosel. Recently they have renamed themselves the Airport Noise Reduction
Committee (ANRC). Whether deliberate of not, that acronym is very close to the existing one
for the ARC and is generating some confusion. I want to make it very clear to you and anyone
else who may be confused that the ANRC has NOTHING to do with the ARC, and that Guy
Heide and Mike Kosel in no way speak for the City of Mendota Heights and have nothing to do
with the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission. We've had to go to great lengths lately
to clarify this and thought a letter was in order to be as emphatic as we can be on this subject.
The ARC has had a busy and productive year and looks forward to continuing to work in a
collaborative way with the MAC, the FAA, and the NOC. We believe we will be good stewards
in serving the City Council and the citizens of Mendota Heights.
Sincerely,
Liz Petschel
ARC Chair
cc: John Huber, Mayor, City of Mendota Heights
Jeff Hamiel, Executive Director, MAC
Chad Leqve, Manager, Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
1101 Victoria Curve a Mendota Heights, MN 55118 ® (651) 452-1850 a PAX (651) 452-8940
www.mendota-heights.com
METROPOLITAN AERPORTS COMMISSION
SPPMinneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport
t t 6040 28th Avenue South - Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799
Phone (612) 726-8100
December 18, 2008
Chair Liz Petschel
City of Mendota Heights
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Heights, MN 55118
Dear Chair Petschel:
Office of Executive Director
On behalf of the Metropolitan Airports Commission Chairman, Jack Lanners, thank you for
your letter of December 11, 2008 regarding the relationship between the Mendota Heights
Airport Relations Commission and the Metropolitan Airports Commission. ltwas very
considerate of you to clarify the difference between the Airport Relations Commission (ARC)
and the Airport Noise Reduction Committee (ANRC). We fully understand that there is no
connection between the two groups. Further, MAC wishes to make it absolutely clear that the
Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission represents the best interests of the City of
Mendota Heights and is appointed by the City Council.
We look forward to a continued outstanding working relationship with you and the ARC
members. MAC is very pleased with the accomplishments and cooperation between your
community and the airport authority.
Aespectfully yours,
Je 'Hamiel
Executive Director
cc: John Huber, Mayor, City of Mendota Heights
Chad Leqve, Manager Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs
The Metropolitan Airports Commission is an affirmative action employer.
www rnspairport.corn
Reliever Airports: AIRLAKE - ANOKA COUNTY/BLAfNE - CRYSTAL - FLYING CLOUD - LAKE ELMO - SAINT PAUL DOWNTOWN
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
January 8, 2009
TO: ARC Commissioners
FROM: Linda Shipton, Senior Secretary
SUBJECT: Updates for Introduction Packet
Please replace the following pages in your ARC Introduction Packet
Table of Contents
Operations North of the 090° Corridor Boundary (put with #14)
The following should be replaced from your monthly ARC Meeting Agenda Packet.
# 7 Airport Noise Report — Put the latest issue of this in your Intro P.adket
#13 November 2008 - Technical Advisors Report
#14 November 2008 - Eagan Mendota Heights Corridor Report
Section
1. Glossary
2. Historical Review Eagan-MH Corridor
3. Creation of ARC
4. Ordinance No. 290
5. ARC Brochure
6. 2008 Airport Noise Plan of Action
7.* Airport Noise Report, December 24, 2008
8. NOC Bylaws
9. NOC Meeting Minutes
10. MAC Approved 2008 Capital Improvement Program
11. What's New at the MAC Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
12. ANOMS Monthly Reports
13. * November 2008 Technical Advisor's Report
14. * November 2008 Eagan Mendota Heights Corridor Report
15. Frequently Asked Questions
16. Contract Pertaining to Limits on Construction of a Third Parallel Runway
17. Crossing in the Corridor
18. Minneapolis Tower Operational Order
19. Runway Use
20. Nighttime Voluntary Noise Agreements
21. Maps
22. ARC DVD
* These items should be replace with updates provided in your monthly ARC packet
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
January 8, 2009
TO: Airport Relations Commission
FROM: Linda Shipton, Senior Secretary
SUBJECT: Operations North of the 090° Corridor Boundary
The following is a tabulation of tracks crossed gate from June 2002 to November
2008 (tracking sheets attached).
2002, June - 137 Tracks Crossed Gate
2002 July - 85
2002 August - 176
2002 Sept. - 111
2002 Oct. - N/A
2002 Nov. - N/A
2002 Dec. - N/A
2003 Jan. - 33
2003 Feb. - 42
2003 March - 64
2003 April - 103
2003 May - 45
2003 June - 80
2003 July - 80
2003 Aug. - 35 it
2003 Sept. - 45 It
2003 Oct. - 29 91
2003 Nov - 52 91
2003 Dec. - 94 It
2004 Jan. - 84 it
2004 Feb. - 129 It
2004 Mar. - 100 It
2004 Apr. - 54 It
2004 May - 204 It
2004 June - 50 14
2004 July - 93 it
2004 August - 117 It
2004 Sept. - 174 19
2004 October - 180 it
2004 November — 108 It
2004 December — 135 It
2005 January - 169
2005 February — 113
2005 March — 79
2005 April — 175
2005 May - 189
2005 June - 156
2005 July - 103
2005 August — 61
2005 September — 175
2005 October - 100
2005 November — 81
2005 December — 60
2006 January — 118
2006 February — 39
2006 March — 79
2006 April — 121
2006 May — 58
2006 June — 96
2006 July - 85
2006 August - 110
2006 September — 95
2006 October - 114
2006 November - 118
2006 December - 96
2007 January — 81
2007 February — 88
2007 March - 183
2007 April - 144
2007 May - 193
2007 June - 127
2007 July — 60
2007 August — 108
2007 September —164
2007 October - 223
2007 November - 63
2007 December — 150
2008 January - 127
2008 February — 99
2008 March - 128
2008 April - 109
2008 May - 144
2008 June - 66
2008 July - 70
2008 August — 73
2008 September —108
2008 October — 72
2008 November - 90
Tracks Crossed Gate
II
„
„
It
It
6
II
It
it
It
II
It
II
tt
II
{I
t{
It
II
It
II
U
II
It
It
It
it
II
It
it
II
It
II
U
II
II
U
II
It
It
Il
It
It
R
Metropolitan Airports Commission
90 (2.8%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During October 2008
Of Those, 0( —jReturned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
R
L
Pllm�.
2,
Li
VA
A.
RE, I ppvl
%
a_YVII 1,16
fM Rio .. . . . . . . . M-1
4
i"T.
_j
V
A3
nP,
A
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate
10/01/2008 00:00:00 - 10/31/2008 23:59:59
90 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 48 (53.3%), Right = 42 (46.7%
Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 11/06/2008 12:38
Metropolitan Airports Commission
' 72C7'7%\Runway 12Land 12RCarrier Jet Departure Operations were
North Ofthe O8O"Corridor Boundary During November 2008
Of Those, 0( —)Returned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate
11/01/200800:00:00-11/30/200823:50:59
72Tracks Crossed Gate: Left =37(51.4Y6).Right =35(48.6Y6
Page Monthly Eagan/MendotHeights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 12/11/2UU813:4G
(�
C
Linda Shipton
�0mm: Jim Danielson
< .. Friday, December 18.2OO81O1GAM
To: Linda Shipton
Subject: FW: MSP Noise NewsRe:News/Events - Fall 2OO8Newsletter
From: MSP Noise News [mai Ito:
Sent: Friday, December 19, 20088:47AM
To:
Subject: MSP Noise NewsRe:News/Events - Fall 2OO8Newsletter
Greetings!
One news update has just been posted to the Metropolitan Airports Commission's Noise Programs Web site at
To find out more, go to the Web site and click on the most recent News/Events postings - "Fall 2008 Newsletter".
Also, don't forget to mark your calendar for the next quarterly public input meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January 27
at 7 p.m. at the MAC General Offices, 6040 28th Avenue South in Minneapolis. For the next ARC agenda
�'oaegewas sent toyou because you subscribed tothe mailing list: To
BSCR|BE.send anemail message to: All other inquiries should basent to:
12Y1g/20A8
A quactedy puhliation of the Metropolitan Airpons Commission - Aviadon Noise and Sacellice Programs
Sound Insulation Program: 61 homes completed, 200 more in progress
The Metropolitan Airports
Commission (MAC) is on track
to complete sound insulation
treatments on 61 homes by year
end. Another 200 homes are
either under construction or
have been invited into the
process.
These 261 homes are part of
Phase 1 of the program and
represent 57 percent of the 455
homes eligible, under the
approved eligibility map, for a
home sound insulation package
that reduces indoor -to -outdoor
noise levels by 5 decibels or
more.
The program is based on a
settlement reached in 2007 with
the cities of 1\/Iinneapolis,
Richfield and Eagan regarding
the scope and schedule of the
expanded program.
Under the terms of the
settlement, MAC is providing a
five decibel noise mitigation
package to eligible homes inside
the 63-64 DNL contours within
the 2007 Noise 111itigation Map.
In addition, in January 2009, the attic and sidewall .insulation.
MAC will launch Phase 2A of Actual treatments will vary
the program. depending upon a home's
Phase 2A involves cw:rent condition and needs.
approximately 2,800 homes that
lie within the 60-62 DNL
contours within the 2007 map.
These homes will be offered a
new central air conditioning
system and an additional $4,000
worth of other mitigation
treatments that could include
doors and windows, new storm
windows and storm doors, and
Homeowners eligible under
either phase are brought into
the program based on a
prioritization system that
invites homeowners on blocks
with the highest noise impacts
into the program first.
Homeowners within the
outermost contours of an older
map (2005 Noise Exposure
Map 60-64), who were not
covered under oilier MAC
noise mitigation projects, are
also eligible to receive
reimbursement for noise
mitigation work they undertake
on their home. Eligible work
must comply with the terms
and conditions of the
settlement in order to qualify.
For more information, please
see the link at
wv vw.macnoise.com/sip/
settlement.
r"
) NOC News
The MSP Noise
Oversight
Committee
(NOC) met
November 19
and discussed
the following items:
Nighttime Operations
Assessment
NOC reviewed an analysis of
nighttime operations at MSP for
the years 2006 and 2007. The
analysis included information on
the number of takeoffs and
landings that occurred during the
rughttime hours of 10:30 p.m. to
6:00 a.m., as well as the number
of operations that occurred
during the hours used for noise
exposure maps (10:00 p.m. to 7
a
a.m..).Tlae analysis also included a
report on the types of aircraft
flying at night, as well as the
number of scheduled operations
compared with the number that
actually occurred.
noise exposure areas. At the
meeting, city representatives from
all three cities reported on the
status of their draft ordinances.
After considerable discussion, the Next NOC Meeting
committee requested that the
IvLA,C include additional.
operations data in the 2008
report, which will be presented to
the group in January 2009.
Community Policies for
Residential Development
As part of a consent decree that
resolved the noise mitigation
lawsuit between the MAC and the
cities of Eagan, Richfield, and
Afinneapolis, the cities were
required to develop draft
ordinances, by September 1, 2008,
concerning residential
development in the 60-64 DNL
The next NOC meeting will be
held January 21 at 1:30 p.m. at
the MAC General Offices.
For more information, call 612-
725-6455 or visit http://
www.macnoise.com/noc.
NOC Meeting Materials
Meeting
ng materials (agendas,
minutes, memos and
presentations) can be accessed on
the MAC website at http://
www.mspairport-com/mac/
meetings/noc.aspx, or call 612-
725-6455.0
2009 MSP Noise Oversight Committee Work Plan
The MSP Noise Oversight noise issues on the west side of
Committee will have its hands fiill the airport near. Cedar Avenue.
in 2009.
When the NOC met in
November, it approved a 2009
Work Plan that includes 18 items
covering technical, policy and
programmatic issues.
A good portion of next year will
be devoted to technical issues,
including review and/or
implementation of several takeoff
and landing procedures, the
transition to a new flight track
data acquisition program, and
continLung to analyze ground
The group will also keep updated
on the status of the Residential
Noise Mitigation Program and
the communities' residential
development policies.
NOC will also develop a public
communication plan for the
reconstruction of the north
parallel runway.
The full 2009 IvISP NOC Work
Plan can be found online at
http://ww-,,v.macnoise.com/
noc. 4
MAC Noise Office receives FAA Community Outreach Award
The Federal Aviation was nominated for the award by In the award notification letter,
Administration last month the FAA's district office in Alles noted that IvIAC's efforts
presented the Metropolitan
Airports Commission with an
Outstanding Achievement Award
for Community and Public
Outreach.
FAA Division Manager Jeri Alles
presented MAC Noise Manager
Chad Leqve with the award on
Nov. 6, citing "extraordinary
measures" by the MAC "to
communicate effectively with the
full range of stakeholders
regarding the runway utilization
and noise impacts of Runway
17/35" at Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport. The MAC
Minneapolis.
The new, fourth runway at MSP
was completed in October 2005
as the capstone of the $3 billion
1VfS.P.• Buildiyig a .Better Ahpor
expansion program.
With input from community,
airline and FAA representatives
serving on the MSP Noise
Oversight Committee, the MAC
developed an extensive
communication program to
inform residents of expected
changes in noise patterns once the
new runway opened.
went -beyond the challenge of
communicating anticipated noise
impacts from the new runway.
"MAC also worked with the
FAA, airlines, communities and
residents to develop and refine
arrival and departure_ procedures
that were consistent with die
runway use numbers published in
the environmental documents
that preceded construction of the
new runway. The new procedures
provided noise relief by sending
more aircraft over less populated
residential areas and commercial/
industrial areas, Alles wrote. +
'.0.
+ ° a, "' A quarterly publication of the Metropolitan Airports
i + 'l
r Commission - Aviation Noire and Satellite Programs
f 6040 28th Avenue S.
Minneapolis, MN 55450
Phone: 612-725-6455
Noise Complaint Line: 612-726-9411
E-mail: info@macnoise.com
Website: www.macnoise.com
Fall 2008
Sound Insulation
Program: 61 homes
complete, 200 more
in progress
NOC News
■
Ask the Expert 2
2009 MSP Noise 3
Oversight Committee
Work Plan
MAC Noise Office 3
receives FAA
Community
Outreach Award
Public Input Meeting Scheduled for January 27
Please join Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) staff at the
next Airport Noise Public Input Meeting on Tuesday, January 27,
2009 at 7 p.m.
The meeting -,vifl be held at the NLAC's General Offices located at
6040 28th Avenue South in Minneapolis. This is an opportunity for
residents to ask questions and learn more about what's new at MSP in
terms of airport noise.
For more information, please contact Christene Sirois at 612-725-
6455 or Christene.Sirois@mspmac.org.®
If you no longer wish to receive this publication, and other airport noise related information, please call or e-mail Christene Sirois at 612-725-6455 or
Christene.Sirois@mspmae.org. In your e-mail, please write the word "delete" in the subject line, followed by your street address and city.
Printed on Recycled Paper
uctober
Noise Oversight Committee (NO,Q
Technical Advisor's Report
pfd''i'hn'T.i_:ty�,•lir^,�.�,9�`%�s.'1�'�
Minneapolis -St. Paul International airport
F•NaM k,
,'L 'f Y„ •" <
s bF:t f is a �� � '�'a�.G l'$'1E��N��^'�,��t �? �_u n -t � �,c P�f�{ ia•�x �°S.£Y� rE� �`�.�fd, "�y a �L',..,�, r,�� }�A f' ,a i
��:9t`3
�r..c �%��
���>�
L'�If�?�
,G',,,e•'!LZ. � � ri1, 5.�� ,+� �'si�,°', �4, �4 ir�.'�"-k`- �.F� .4 Pr<�'�'�- �u L. kr'' ��,d
arifa..c aL-... !v fi� k i�y'. .z s 7"`"ti kf r4 G .✓' C?]"^`it""" a "t c k r iii 'iiiL,i
�` �'�t+y1� s�hF-1:7" s �''�w, � t� � �:9.p `y'"r�`' �5.r,.'�t.m +•� •.,t-i� "" � r> ",�'53�.�i +;y '�.y.�j .�- `�'{-p w`�'''�' #,@,E.Ti4`� •f33r'4i j'`',,,['�� ..i �+���'�) s" G`'"`,;}�;
.En`f'd¢1 {'ih`
w.-,Y.i�"nb�yt,{,il',�'��+{t �i-;r;t
t L•t-k. �`"
rig,",
.�
..:�'t sy -^S
}.'.y,�.,�.,.
jyi(fiaf4... �'.t%y9,Y�3 t^'Fyy✓a.d ),S.f i''��1�Li�YY�
1 •v �:� A'4r� ,.A F 1,J� k,t...>,«'Fit�^+ �: `�''3!" ,..t l(S''at� r, 'i,
) 3
itdp.� f}.7 J hi� b✓ FfH � y.�.� k
6y t k A T T R FiF
t=v''�gvF �.tt"�i',3
f Yi51' C?/i'3 A hF '�•y # .l. J '-S Y,�'�� wi"J ,{, c�'"ve-nGL 'arw '''..}f+,°�r3r�.�il,..,l t 3 T �KSs�., 6 '?'�"i�iw.p� P�S' '�Y y� i'
y `Y fifv�°'4 z� �•'{} x %� �4�.-ki��y-,i� _� I�'•Y�•I?�K � f4 Y�4 ,y i {". F"�kG�1. e`'ifi'.� A�:;.�`Z 3:�. 'tGi 4i � yc�'uS�J fJ� ..�'i.. .A'kY .ij�',{T
� �
'��� .y'ic` Y�,i"t 4.
f�r t } �S-eT �F ?13t�ra.. 4 J y � i I 'tet- (J 1 i i ` F+`�tl."N�•1 :'S ��?��.:
-i�`•C"3
N
�.
�. L.Ic'W � sY �, ( .C�.^i�
. C � y ,( +,� i �
a5 �� r� T �M 7 � Y°v :1 Ly T.. `�'' �,�} !((ted� s�+1 , �s-.hut c ��{{`7' ' T ' v*i J y 5 Ifs: �. r' -M y
2 ��Ht +us1� M � rtX# y''"t�d7 (Y�ik'• .j "`41 '� L, e. > �. �„A?�' �" �3 ft 2 1, j� s I ^�{! �•'p � i�`t4Y r ��k� � 1-.-�T��Y t 1 eY �d>�,"'
#f �M- Xy�(� if ,Ml .,,�� i ;�. � : 6 xk,t � hs`vn � a 4 , '� k( i `rte-`v4$t ]�'}y i i ' i c� t �� ✓ r _ v .icer' y��",'�ry{d�-fy, '` � -3 t t z-� y',.3e
�(1Uy'WyYi{G
'�'4-e�"5 hT i7'- .ipf aCk. .�1}� t� 1.: §; !;'. ,Y+ "'x'�c"`} d 34u11t° i.;•1�'
r�'7nsn��1(j ,�''kyt i d "ixi t+�'f'"it-. .r�•i'ES i`"+ty xl��• i "- -f a r f_7� p ci F!.%-•e„ti'h.. �t'3�'4lwca�,�,Y 3u. � 1 x r
'i•-�
�Y �tt- ��v�.+l S_• t �-er ..:,,�ss� �y',.
t�..:s
i`'v' '�•�uG�•�.,
C � n.^�-T'?,1:.�`.l33� 1 y
'i a aI�S+Y-,i'�C',a}.M1 j�f7'.'l� ..
3{,o-�� i ��Tn}� x 7 bf t"F�I i J���r .�-�r'�if '"r". t 51
yti.
4 YY:;� y
��y fid,, tiJ�4 5,4 �lclaJi'>E$rt f44pF i � t)
lit
fYJ3,Y TL ie.c y
*;1 •h�' r.n I}{ A .�F`^2,.� + k3, 1 d I'✓'1,. S,y •r"rtq t '�}' ".f -A1Hk't j .f a'M 5'4v' '�S t L �,Nc �ti'" T7 �y' 2 {t=' f �•��L y,�y�NSd'�T `i.
?�{{�_••7 �P 1 � Y't �nh � L� •{,� •d tt..' �l�y t �i� (? �' Fr � ! ��„{'a� � �t n_�f �al'�[�1�.• Fi{}'7.' I f�.Y,�`A_•S,'..'ca.J Y.d7 F�'�1�� �f,
�
z �( 94 I ,TI J'¢1" , � Z ; I�L� .4 "R7 �. mak' '�Y rt' -Sf
.0 if`i;4
r �,W ath 7 �✓G R1 ( h T... t }. i t)4� v 3 l ti C i 5 4� GI uy 'tyi Jt J'.v" tt"4'j,�Y z l t•� fi 1 .ttY +i ."1 ,y , ,r4(,R .
ri .rji V T }'� A 'Y`<", �. v3F ( ,,3')''�r'11" `f.+ 'TI
31 y `T��tt"•i V
i rS�,NY y�JC'i' ..t ,t
9.f•� f-. w 4.. 't �b i ''EM � 53�
p {t�R, ��r=
ifj �'
tk� }:L J I � rj
e.i„!v}-alt i y �y '�t �ir1 }
L• f6� �'� ..4+�Y� F � �•yp� �y
X� i( l '.3tt `�Wt[^n .SSS A .f•� 1„ 1,�y -�y;A,�.�y9 'hlL� Y iM1�'i Pri' # £ i � 4•..(+h 3X�-� � L"'�l^`i 1 7 -�• 4 1.
'�P I
I} � t 3{ i ryl�d � i E ;#tip="� 'j. e'F"tt T �� 't r +r`, f Y`t"�r' •a �°S. a{� 4 r. �'S :'zy. � .a.I.rl l ��E'. r ,� +`;'.
Y � .ir
}.,.f�(ril Y` ��{�,1✓` F•y.`t rl;.¢�} s tl @!-'•`•k t• 'iY"a t S.t i 1 tte'a: �... '� �� ��W a� R 'Y �^1� �Ct^
y�� � Y>�'f '•� r� I v't�. Jn W '�..0 raG �� J r "y+-�'-'.c .� int 7 )'�t�';
i��
7{li'+'P 5£- � ,&i �r
a, `•.r. } ! i h ti T e -F4 "� L� r d �'`ki ri'rr ,�,^ rte. z. '� L M-df�
a "�"'• I
Zr
;ti�i.t•`r'�y,�'� .ks�+' Isk.!. g"� 'er
"41
ay r
}� aJ4�pti .�`�'��`s `K' Z1 i•Ya,'� ] `�y' I i et`��`9�1* '�b1 �,r*� t�',k,131'izY x��, i �r� �`"rS`" E , ,11}ur�..'4k�%�,t7(". `<tp - _ y' 'ur } s ;`r77r..�i, n moi' y?�PryI 3I - ;�t�iYfuP ,3''����hm,irJ"�rf"vy�^S4�rV �
V1S 6a�EE°11
,
I
� �} [y��/,r�„ R (C� �I� � s T�' ri � i s�._S't''-cu�sx r"` ,� r � _ � .t� `� `�0-��E�yt�.>,*� a �• v"•
� I i "5} � -tt $qpp i f i a •y y } ,"'ti%
{f
�� ��Y"�r t��'h� �+kk 1 t�i jt7•i � 6Sr -+f' f � y�r�3l•.�u��.
.k }•+ti'Y .M
1 >GLi
�{- I{`tC-j.' ,, 2 ,�•,'G:. 1
R �dP�'��'1
RUN= rf^,,y sAy I ��( ) 12
�� I 7 i" t
04,
At
it�. . ,,,, s �` SAI,v
...t*,,., a:��v;( r i. 5 Po1.15' v
i)ar' t ixY• Yrvl•79- yS
rX-i•• Y dw t i�,a d6L i •, ¢� r 'i:
^'S Y C R t 1 G I l�Y i R L i Y•{ C a A
MOE
•�. a �'�'t r'.',. ��i c�t� E t +�•z�� ���'�� t-�'��.Y�"'��r�'+++..-,���4a+. �7�.�„.'`YQ�' > yfi'�' `+�� .r`"it,� .i � �'
t ��"` �Sub,�„�'#� h'�• � I. 5`' t+�Fjvi�G-F L�Y7' y • f � '� M} �
P�,e"�Jy
� pp1����<��Y,��KrS,�r� �
q".�S('`.�4 �: 'figT'i{�`•�� F!E'� l t i4rpt^tl.Jli4hiSS�'t� �•�=.• j47q"1fR.1 TA tW + h ),.NG 7" ,��•'� �.F�..SZ1 . ,2,�,- � q a•
' � �; �t s+�S�rY'�� ""s l' ^""'L it•''
S.
P�„imm�^•c�,a�
T...
�',�+i� ��G,t.�-•�.}7 i,,
�5.
,.: .,,-. ,.s�u't: P_ ,I'i.• (s.9N�
Table of Contents for October 2008
Complaint Summary
Noise Complaint Map
FAA Available Time for Runway Usage
MSP All Operations Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage
MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators Stage Mix
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map
Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events
Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT
Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9-11
12
13
14-17
18
19
20
21
—22
—23-35
36-38
MSP Complaints by City
October 2008
Nature of MSP Complaints
`I Airport ;R„
Time
Early,Ute
112
Number of
Number d
°16'6f Totali:.
wlrl�
Excessive Noise
2759
V
Frequency
60
525
Ground Noise
12
734
Helicopter
3
258
Low Flying
33
3195
MINNEAPOLIS
3
.d
8
I
31
351-11V
1140
46
21.5%
EAGAN
0
1791
785
24
q r,r04
2705
38
51.1%
Nz
BLOOMINGTON
0
6
066'21��
7
U.
76
17
1.4 %
.4,
APPLE VALLEY
2
138
0
8
248
14
4.7%
MENDOTA
0
U
7
17
8
0.3%
HEIGHTS
inv BI N
SAINT LOUIS PARK
0
H
0
u
18
6
0.3%
BURNSVILLE
0
0
66
4
0
71
5
1.3%
SAINT PAUL
0
0
-
1
, .R.. - Q*,U
U
5
0.1%
'EI
RICHFIELD
0
HIM.
2
Pj' n
851
0
860
4
16.2%
EDEN PRAIRIE
0
Qis
2
i;�
1
10
4
0.2%
0 U
EDINA
0
0 i,
1
N
a 0
2
Fccir 0
3
3
0.1%
LAKEVILLE
0
22
0
0
0
12
14
2
0.6%
CHANHASSEN
0
7; ..iff,
111 1
00
0
R
96
1
L8%
5 L .. i
I f2l, W
NVEST SAINT PAUL
00
1
2
4
0
0
4
1
0.1%
ROSEVILLE
0
Ali -i�
54-1 R
1
0
SH i
0
in
2
1
0%
�i
i:0
SOUTH SAINT
0
0
N -H
J
2
2i d'Og L,
1R.rRa; 14
4
1
0%
PAUL
PLYMOUTH
1
U
0
M
01
1
0%
.. . ........ .-
MINNETONKA
0
0
0
1
0%
INVER GROVE
0IGHTS
0
't".
N:
0%
U
...... . ....... -
HASTINGS
1
j
0
0
...........
0
1
1
0%
-hn
j �T-,,47 j;
5
-..; if:.:
- :'"r I'
i'. , 519.9
`.'..'.160..:.1
Nature of MSP Complaints
`I Airport ;R„
Time
Early,Ute
112
_
23
Engine Run-up6
0600-0659
wlrl�
Excessive Noise
2759
V
Frequency
60
525
Ground Noise
12
734
Helicopter
3
258
Low Flying
33
3195
Structural Disturbance
8
239
Ogler
I
12
94yS
Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints riled via the Internet.
Sum of% Total of Complaints may not equal 100%ducterounding.
*As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple
complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of
complaint descriptors may be more than the number of reported complaints.
Time of Day
`I Airport ;R„
Time
Total
0000-0559
_
23
19
0600-0659
51
Crystal
0700-1159
911
277
1200-1559
525
361
1600-1959
734
0
2000-2159
258
2200-2259
235
2300-2359
23
Complaints by Airport
`I Airport ;R„
,Total
MSP
5296
Airlake
19
Anoka
10
Crystal
0
Flying Cloud
277
Lake Elmo
0
St. Paul
29
Misc.
0
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 1 -
MSP International Airport
Aviation Noise Complaints for October 2008
WhRap
a
Brooklyn Pq5tM
rJz
a��s
X P IN
Hi T
2
kly n
:It " R W376 -r-, 1 r 4
kM 8.
4 1� I
N
Y131 r;�
Ar U it
iT
&
AP1
19
t" Z4
0900
oFt
-41
fig
On
V
A,
--J
N -g
`J!
L
Y'k
sin ;t a t
A
'�p 49,�, I - ,
H r -SS
R
k? h
19
N, Q
j,
J, K�
R , MW
11X
g
ii i, E� v
9?6�, K
.q
77 T
Qg
W—e r—
lg�
q S
aul%jj-, f -
r 44
VA,
IL
, 4
-51 -01
S,�
orn!
UN
I iNil
311 koplee AV
h-r--
vage it,r-
MW
dl) ey
Rosemou
171
%
�Nti -. f
.4
14t-
Lakevil
I e
I Farmin
T
in
Number of Complaints per Address
1-5 6-15 16-44 45-96 97-198 199-365 366-846 847-1785
-2- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Available Hours for Runway Use
October 2008
(Source: FAA Runway Use Logs)
All Hours t ,:
�„ r � ` �3 � 4 �CC'�6116 .., hJN ��'S ��,��tlR•4 t � .�
1 ' -� Yx,
I' int Pa �;
� : eta 1
{3 ' � i �` � s. t �� �,. �"L...:- � � a � iF?,� 1 jaf if -1.- Y L•� 71}L .t % i
j r J
0,
�El i i �• ii � �� �r �S�a�.3�1- � �:x , _. �i�'`Lttk�i� FK�L�t k ti
ch }
j ffreld t:
9 p£ i
�-i
z ;: to Hei�hz
M C 9SP? 13
Y.
r t'.
iii 9 r7 k t✓ i # 1 f r
(ojj
rnin r r Eargara j
h
t
f;{
,i Nighttime Hours ,5
10:30pm to 6:00am
f :r
t �
a e ti
neapohs i Pa
K 4� lin u
��
fes^^
110.
F:I0 field
+o
s
93
3.'e:-a.xcs
Itf'V
FAA Averaae Dailv Count
�` Octobert2007 Oe#ober 2008
P.
Air Carrier
766
737
Commuter
406
420
General Aviation
50
52
Military
8
12
Note: Sum of daily average count may not equal total due to rounding.
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 3 -
All Operations
Runway Use Report October 2008
U E. 5 -ii
I i 1 JU !.&H -5,111,6,.p".! R1
, '0
U., H T 1
Conti ion
—
Co nUNI, ast Year.,
I}
Fin
0':
V.
1 -W.. W an
I ;?u X,
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington
0 0%
16
0.1%
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield-
4159 22.5%
3071
15.7%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
3869 20.9%
1548
7.9%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis
0 0%
1798
9.2%
22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park
0 0%
1174
6%
30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights
3562 19.3%
1835
9.4%
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights
4200 22.7%
5495
28.1%
1
35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan
2695 14.6%
4611
23.6%
2, L
10N. M q,
N IIJE.I�?I�Ii-
M, fiUM 'N" NN N
pi n -00 oi-�
HNRIIN ar"Ifl"i
Wii.
04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park
6 0%
380
2%
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
2671 14.6%
5126
26.6%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
1540 8.4%
338
1.8%
17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan
4664 25.6%
3675
19.1%
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington
21 0.1%
235
1.2%
30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
4053 22.2%
2195
11.4%
30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
5289 29%
3931
20.4%
35 Dep So. Minneapolis
1 0%
3384
17.6%
q
a:Departures' 18245
a P. Fpl!3673038812 !
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
-4- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
i.
Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report October 2008
U.nzi
ERTIf .1- 1. 1 i, Yea
d, 41.1HIN Ti I !!-h
i; -Tp
E --M; 1 a
,CountCount
A K "AUE
A ti 6§ h N
OverflightHN.
Pgrp, igh
04
Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington
0
0%
11
0.1%
12L
Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
3407
22.5%
2542
15.8%
12R
Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
3206
21.1%
1319
8.2%
17
Arr So. Minneapolis
0
0%
1478
9.2%
22
Arr St. Paul/Highland Park
0
0%
1023
6.4%
30L
Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights
2934
19.3%
1465
9.1%
30R
ArrEagan/Mendota Heights
3457
22.8%
4488
27.9%
35
Arr Bloomington/Eagan
2164
14.3%
3768
23.4%
KIM
'A -V15168 16094
.a
04
Dep St. Paul/Highland Park
5
0%
324
2%
12L
Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
1956
13%
4185
26.2%
12R
Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
1284
8.5%
294
1.8% 1
17
Dep Bloomington/Eagan
4068
27.1%
3155
19.7%
22
Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington
21
0.1%
198
1.2%
30L
Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
3334
22.2%
1824
11.4%
30R.
Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
4352
29%
3191
20%
35
Dep So. Minneapolis
0
1 0%
2820
u T, '
p .ep, v
15020�u.
1599,1
TotalOperafions30188
32085
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 5 -
October 2008 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
Part 36 Take 3 ,
4 Y r.� v .g.. rr ,
k Type Off Nose Level Aircraft Description _ Stage ,Count' Percent
.....,. _.. .ow.._....... ,....
B742 110 Boeing 747-200 3 21 0.1%
DC10
103
McDonnell Douglas DC10
3
201
0.7%
B744
101.6
Boeing 747-400
3
70
0.2%
DCBQ
100.5
McDonnell Douglas DC8 Re -manufactured
3
44
0.1%
MD11
95.8
McDonnell Douglas MD11
3
34
0.1%
8767
95.7
Boeing 767
3
43
0.1%
A330
95.6
Airbus Industries A330
3
301
1%
B72Q
94.5
Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3
3
125
0.4%
A300
94
Airbus Industries A300
3
115
0.4%
A310
92.9
Airbus Industries A310
3
41
0.1%
B73Q
92.1
Boeing 737 Modified Stage 3
3
4
0%
MD80
91.5
McDonnell Douglas MD80
3
958
3.2%
B757
91.4
Boeing 757
3
2681
8.9%
DC9Q
91
McDonnell Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3
3
2634
8.7%
A321
89.8
Airbus Industries A321
3
61
0.2%
8734
88.9
Boeing 737-400
3
23
0.1%
8739
88.4
Boeing 737-900
3
8
0%
A320
87.8
Airbus Industries A320
3
4161
13.8%
B738
87.7
Boeing 737-800
3
880
2.9%
B735
87.7
Boeing 737-500
3
375 1
1.2%
B733
87.5
Boeing 737-300
3
494
1.6%
A318
87.5
Airbus Industries A318
3
42
0.1%
B7377
87.5
Boeing 737-700
3
442
1.5%
A319
87.5
Airbus Industries A319
3
3737
12.4%
E190
83.7
Embraer 190
3
127
0.4%
E145
83.7
Embraer 145
3
661
2.2%
E170
83.7
Embraer 170
3
2509
8.3%
8717
83
Boeing 717
3
28
0.1%
CRJ
82.7
Canadair Regional Jet
3
8988
29.8%
E135
77.9
Embraer 135
3
368
1.2%
J328
76.5
Fairchild Dornier 328
3
12
0%
rvore: Sum or neer mix w may not equal IUM/6 clue to rounding.
t
M.
n: Goun .:Percent Pefcenfi
Stage 11 0 0% 0%
Stage III 2763 9.2% 13.7%
Stage III Manufactured 27425 90.8% 86.3%
k, Tdtal Stage
Note: Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet all stage III criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation
(FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS
DCBQ are re -engined with manufactured stage 3 engines and are classified as Stage III Manufactured as of
January 1, 2008.
-The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during
take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level).
•EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level
of an aircraft flyover measured in A -weighted decibels.
- 6 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 600 a.m.
Runway Use Report October 2008
hi'HOPUlil'.,
-Aef.11V Count Last Year
RUM
Ott i
P. .19 F .3 -pep.pon Je;p
04
Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington
0
0% 4
03%
12L
Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
183
14.5% 311
23.9%
12R
Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
297
23.5% 92
7.1%
17
Arr So. Minneapolis
0
0% 46
3.5%
22
Arr St. Paul/Highland Park
0
0% 1
0.1%
30L
Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights
526
41.6% 165
12.7%
30R
Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights
254
20.1% 412
31.6%
35
Arr Bloomington/Eagan
4
0.3% 272
20.9%
6 6VIA v g
M, !Rl! N, i'. -N
W. P,,,-,:
04
Dep St. Paul/Highland Park
0
0% 1 29
3.1%
12L
Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
244
34.8% 327
34.8%
12R
Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
133 -
19% 25
2.7%
17
Dep Bloomington/Eagan
80
11.4% 136
14.5%
22
Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington
0
0% 28
3%
30L
Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
78
11.1% 1 45
4.8%
30R
Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
165
23.5% 262
27.9%
35
Dep So. Minneapolis
1
0.1% 88
9.4%
T4 a NTJ, 40,
V .
::i A
Total i.Upera 1pps 1965
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 7 -
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Runway Use Report October 2008
"A 7
-,zpf
1. L. . . . . . . . . . . .
mbipolis
U
tnt �kljl .-
4-
-0
R!,
M
.1 lz�
AMa "I'i
RI "z;�
....... ..........
R -
� 1K,
j V�,N��' '---�t�_,--�-" ., M� - W,
N,
oil,
L P_
0
'M�
i h t fe I 7dF,d] '�'j
N
g
7
. ......... . . ..... . .
N
_R_
_7 7v
R
A!,
ph
za,
k�V
"0
NNII
;7, 0 y
7] lam
6,
U.
Air ..3 z;;
Opll;;;,ir.zlintnl- jUH i1r,".
Tit
FE 4— 1.t,., 90 R,
aupll A 5 L1,19 P
Iii !- Nit p g 2.1AR Riii1l"KO'.
N ount fl,� fl&a
yNT:
I.E
R.
iq
RE tt
- p gn
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington
0 0% 4
0.3%
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
177 15.7% 274
23.8%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
260 23.1% 87
7.6%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis
0 0% 42
3.7%
22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park
0 0%
1
0.1%
30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights
447 39.8% 141
12.3%
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights
240 21.4% 371
32.3%
35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan
0 0% 229
19.9%
u". "ANGR�j M. 0.!, jl�lj
Og-Totalg.
p
HEMP. 0. .5 R,
il::il.n....�,!".�l.i,-.�tip��-�i!,�;�;.r"I
SHER
04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park
0, 0% 28
3.4%
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
209 37.5% 283
34.1%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights
84 15.1% 25
3%
17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan
71 12.7% 121
14.6%
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington0
0% 21
2.5%
30L Dep So.Minneapolis/No. Richfield ------
55 9.9% 34
4.1%
30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
139 24.9% 242
29.1%
35 Dep So. Minneapolis
0 0% 77
0.3%
8
A
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
-8- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
November 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
300
250
200
150
100
50
o
U-) C> W") <> UI) <> W3 <> W) <> U') C> U-) C> Lo <> u - <> U w C> U - ) C> U - <> U1 <> to
C', 12 IR 4"2 7-t
CM N M co co co 0.0 C> C> _4 q eq N N N N M M C) M
C> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> O O <> <> <> <> <> <>
Time
November 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations
10:30 D.M. to 6:00 2.M.
I ... wreiAirline i!
o f
j� Manufactured
ag ---
Stage 2 ade3111MR6f1,
Northwest (NWA)
0
62
356
418
UPS (UPS)
0
0
166
166
Delta (DAL)
0
0
89
89
FedEx (FDX)
0
0
81
81
Continental (COA)
0
0
70
70
US Airways (USA)
0
0
55
55
Sun Country (SCX)
0
0
51
51
Midwest Airlines (MEP)
0
0
50
50
Kitty Hawk (KHA)
0
10
32
42
BAX (78W)
0
40
0
40
American (AAL)
0
0
36
36
Airtran (TRS)
0
0
30
30
Frontier Airlines (FIFT)
0
0
30
30
United (UAL)
0
0
24
24
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
ta
22:35
D
FedEx
1021
A300
M
MTSSu
22:35
D
Northwest
562
A320
M
MTWThFSSu
DEN MSP MKE
22:42
A
Continental
2877
E145
M
MTWThFSu
EWR MSP
22:43
A
Frontier Airlines
109
A319
M
MTVvThFSSu
DEN MSP
22:45
D
Northwest
1715
A319
M
MTWThFSu
DCA MSP FSD
22:55
A
Sun Country
704
B738
M
MTWThFS
PHX MSP
22:56
A
Northwest
310
A319
M
MTWThFSu
LAX MSP
23:07
A
Delta
1522
B738
M
MTWThFSSu
'ATL MSP
23:12
A
United
463
B733
M
MTWThF
ORD MSP
23:15
A
Midwest Airlines
2775
CRJ
M
MTWThFSu
ELE MIKE MSP
23:17
A
United
463
B733
M
Su
ORD MSP
23:20
A
American
1673
MD80
M
MTWThFSu
DCA ORD MSP
23:20
A
Sun Country
106
B738
M
MTThFSu
LAS MSP
23:27
A,
Northwest
2007
E175
M
MTWThFSu
DTW MSP
23:42
A
US Airways
940
A320
M
MTWThFSu
SAN PHX MSP
23:47
A
US Airways
1074
A319
M
MTWThFSSu
CLT MSP
23:54
A
Continental
2816
E145
M
MTWThFSu
IAH MSP
23:55
A
American
2049
B738
M
MTWThFSSu
MIA MSP
23:55
A
Sun Country
404
B738
M
MTWThFSu
SAN MSP
00:03
A
UPS
552
B757
M
TWThF
00:04
A
UPS
552
B757
M
TW
00:04
A
UPS
556
A300
M
TWThF
00:04
A
UPS
556
DC8Q
M
TW
00:05
A
UPS
496
B757
M
S
00:05
A
UPS
558
DC8Q
M
Th
00:05
A
UPS
560
B767
M
TWThF
00:06
D
UPS
496
B757
M
S
00:07
D
UPS
2557
B767
M
TWTh
00:15
A
Kitty Hawk
772
B733
M
TWThF
DEN MCI MSP FWA
00:16
A
UPS
560
B757
M
Su
00:16
A
UPS
560
DC8Q
M
Su
00:17
A
UPS
2558
B767
M
MTWTh
UPS
B757
M
TTI)
UPS
495
13757
M
S.
1O
' - Report Generated: 11/1O/2OU810:18
November 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations
ay
a rn e r'. quipmen age, Operation 6 qn
00:21
D
UPS
551
8757
M
TWThF
00:21
D
UPS
557
DC8Q
M
TWThF
00:21
D
UPS
559
8767
M
TWThFS
00:21
D
UPS
559
MD11
M
TW
00:21
D
UPS
561
B757
M
TW
00:22
D
UPS
555
A300
M
TWThF
00:22
D
UPS
555
DC8Q
M
TW
00:22
D
UPS
559
MD11
M
Th
00:23
D
UPS
495
B757
M
S
00:23
D
UPS
551
A300
M
S
00:23
D
UPS
559
MD11
M
S
00:30
A
Kitty Hawk
1850
B72Q
H
S
PDX SEA MSP FWA
00:45
D
Kitty Hawk
772
B733
M
TWThF
DEN MCI MSP FWA
01:15
D
Kitty Hawk
1850
B72Q
H
S
PDX SEA MSP FWA
03:30
D
FedEx
1407
MD11
M
MTWThSti
04:00
D
FedEx
1718
MD11
M
MTWSu
04:40
D
FedEx
2718
MD11
M
Th
04:45
D
FedEx
1744
A310
M
MTWSu
05:25
D
Delta
1073
8738
M
TThSu
MSP ATL
05:25
D
Delta
599
B738
M
MWFS
MSP ATL SDQ
05:42
A
Northwest
844
B757
M
S
ANC MSP BOS
05:45
D
Continental
2017
E145
M
MTWThF
MSP IAH
05:47
A
Northwest
154
B753
M
MTWThFSSu
SEA MSP
05:49
A
Northwest
808
A333
M
MTWThFSSu
HNL MSP
05:53
A
Northwest
314
A320
M
MTWThFSSu
LAX MSP
05:53
A
Northwest
3467
CRJ
M
MTWThF
BIS MSP MCI
05:53
A
Northwest
774
8757
M
MTThFSSu
LAS MSP
05:53
A
Northwest
808
A333
M
S
HNL MSP
05:55
A
Northwest
744
DC9Q
H
MTWThFSSu
GFK MSP DTW
05:55
D
FedEx
2405
A300
M
W
05:55
D
Midwest Airlines
2810
CRJ
M
MTWThFS
MSP MKE CMH
05:56
A
Northwest
362
A320
M
MTThFSSu
SFO MSP
05:57
A
Northwest
3277
CRJ
M
MTWThFS
RST MSP OMA
06:57
A
Northwest
3463
CRJ
M
MTWThFS
LSE MSP IAH
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 11 -
October 2008 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Total Nighttime Jet
Operations by Hour
11' el�i,'�L."",!,','-..'�.",,,.."I-�;.�,o1D
�y
Stage ='T,
Count;
American
AAL
3
8738
fl
American
AAL
3
MD80
30
America West
AWE
fl
A319
31
11' el�i,'�L."",!,','-..'�.",,,.."I-�;.�,o1D
�y
Stage ='T,
Count;
American
AAL
3
8738
32
American
AAL
3
MD80
30
America West
AWE
3
A319
31
America West
AWE
3
A321
26
America West
AWE
3
E190
2
Continental Exp.
BTA
3
E145
59
Capital Cargo Intl.
CCI
3
B72Q
—24
Compass
CPZ
3
E170
93
Delta
DAL
3
—B7377
11
Delta
DAL
3
B738
26
Delta
DAL
3
MD80
29
DHL
DHL
3
B72Q
51
FedEx
FDX
3
A300
17
FedEx
FDX
3
A310
20
FedEx
FDX
3
DC1 0
42
Pinnacle
FLG
3
CRJ
110
Mesaba
MES
3
CRJ
262
Northwest
NWA
3
A319
57
Northwest
NWA
3
A320
93
Northwest
NWA
3
A330
31
Northwest
NWA
3
B742
I
Northwest
NWA
3
B757
157
Northwest
NWA
3
DC9Q
148
Sun Country
SCx
3
B7377
2
Sun Country
SCx
3
B738
108
Skywest Airlines
SKW
3
CRJ
29
United
UAL
3
A319
1
United
UAL
3
B733
28
United
UAL
3
B735
24
UPS
UPS
3
A300
20
UPS
UPS
3
B757 1
24
UPS
UPS
3
8767
11
UPS
UPS
3
DC8Q
22
UPS
UPS
3
MD1 1
5yc
M, Mi
12 l
H "E
Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 96.7% of the total nighttime carrier jet operations.
- 12 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
October 2008 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
400
350
cn 300
Gt
250
JML
0
200
to
150
100
50
ns
<> 117 <> to <> to <> ICJ <> to <> to C> Ln <> U-7 <> ICJ <> 117 <> to <> 117 <M, to <> to C> U7
In -:t IR It'! M ct IR T! M V' IR -! In "[t IR Ili In "!t O T! In "Ct IR Ti M C- IR ii M "V'
C11 CIj M C13 co M <> <> <> <> 1-4 'A 1-1 -1 cli cli . . . M co CI) a- -_v Ir Ir U7 W] Ln ui
" cm . . . N <> <> <> 0 <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> C> <> <> <> <> <> <> O <> -C> <> <>
-rime
October 2008 Nighttime Carrier Jet Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines
10:30 D.M. to 6:00 a.m.
n: Manufactured , 2�
N WA HZNII,%��P Stage.rg hF, OM,
Northwest (NWA)
0
148
339
487
Mesaba (MES)
0
0
262
262
Pinnacle (FLG)
0
0
110
110
Sun Country (SCX)
0
0
110
110
Compass (CPZ)
0
0
93
93
UPS (UPS)
0
0
82
82
FedEx (FDX)
0
0
79
79
Delta (DAL)
0
0
66
66
American (AAL)
0
0
62
62
America West (AWE)
0
0
59
59
Continental Exp. (BTA)
0
0
59
59
United (UAL)
0
0
53
53
DHL (DHL)
0
51
0
51
Skywest Airlines (SKW)
0
0
29
29
Capital Cargo Intl. (CCI)
0
24
0
24
Other
0
3
53
56
'E
4 1,68
Report Generated: 1 1/1 0/2008 10:19 -13-
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — October 2008
Oct 1 thru 8, 2008 — 3927 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Oct 1 thru 8, 2008 — 3884 Carder Jet Departures
Oct 1 thru 8, 2008 — 289 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Oct 1 thru 8, 2008 —139 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
-14- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Oct 9 thru 16, 2008 — 3888 Carrier Jet Arrivals
III r I
T& 11:
Oct 9 thru 16, 2008 — 3855 Carrier Jet Departures
Oct 9 thru 16, 2008 — 288 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Oct 9 thru 16, 2008 —141 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 -15-
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — October 2008
Oct 17 thru 24, 2008 — 3932 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Oct 17 thru 24, 2008 — 3898 Carrier Jet Departures
Oct 17 thru 24, 2008 — 298 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Oct 17 thru 24, 2008 — 154 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
- 16 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — October 2008
Oct 25 thru 31, 2008 — 3421 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Oct 25 thru 31, 2008 — 3383 Carrier Jet Departures
Oct 25 thru 31, 2008 — 249 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Oct 25 thru 31, 2008 —124 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
l!llllElll!l
MSP International AiTort
Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations
�
-18Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
-
Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events
gn 164N R."U T! it
Rif W! R, ,
g it R
....... ...... ...... . ......... .. ..
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41st St.
21:19:10
00:01:54
00:00:00
00:00:00
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
20:58:09
00:14:19
00:00:07
00:00:00
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
21:24:54
00:51:00
00:00:26
00:00:00
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
20:09:12
00:20:19
00:00:06
00:00:00
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
22:15:03
04:16:02
00:02:19
00:00:00
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
22:36:12
03:51:14
00:04:38
00:00:04
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
00:36:34
00:00:17
00:00:00
00:00:00
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
00:17:25
00:00:08
00:00:00
00:00:00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
00:00:45
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
00:01:15
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
00:00:20
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
00:00:29
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
00:13:30
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
14
Eagan
1 st St. & McKee St.
24:50:12
00:01:01
00:00:00
00:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
00:47:59
00:00:23
00:00:00
00:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
19:43:24
01:00:57
1 00:00:13
00:00:00
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
00:01:32
00:00:05
00:00:00
00:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
00:31:48
00:00:16
00:00:05
00:00:00
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
00:15:15
00:00:08
00:00:00
00:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
00:01:05
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
00:16:35
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
13:44:19
00:00:04
00:00:00
00:00:00
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
02:27:43
00:01:05
00:00:00
00:00:00
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
25:24:55
00:02:10
00:00:00
00:00:00
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
00:47:42
00:00:04
00:00:00
00:00:00
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
01:48:34
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
00:12:27
00:00:01
00:00:00
00:00:00
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
02:10:04
00:00:38
00:00:00
00:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
00:01:20
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
04:30:31
00:00:14
00:00:00
00:00:00
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
00:00:29
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
00:00:46
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
00:01:57
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
00:06:16
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
07:01:29
00:00:09
00:00:00
00:00:00
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
11:40:56
00:00:09
00:00:00
00:00:00
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
00:02:15
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
00:00:29
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
39
Eagan
3477 St. Charles Pl.
00:01:43
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
ffilq- Mid' itEvents54
7-
0o ao 04
0-4
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 19 -
Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events
October 2008
EU
UN
511.
IN MR
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 03:48:49 00:01:31 00:00:00 00:00:oo
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
04:51:41
00:02:41
00:00:01
00:00:0o
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
09:29:23
00:05:43
00:00:20
00:00:00
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
12:28:59
00:13:40
00:00:47
00:00:00
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
36:43:08
02:38:23
00:18:33
00:00:03
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
46:56:53
06:05:55
00:46:46
00:00:15
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
19:36:51
1 00:37:06
00:00:26
00:00:00
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
14:09:05
00:24:54
00:00:15
00:00:00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
00:04:52
00:00:07
00:00:00
00:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
00:08:41
00:01:18
00:00:29
00:00:00
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
00:06:44
00:01:13
00:00:18
00:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
00:04:40
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:oo:-00
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
08:14:00
00:01:34
00:00:00
00:00:00
14
Eagan
1st St. & McKee St.
09:28:56
00:23:10
00:00:14
00:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
12:25:13
00:08:45
00:00:09
00:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
09:59:51
00:41:58
00:01:58
00:00:00
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
00:31:28
00:04:21
00:00:39
00:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
15:33:03
00:20:18
00:02:29
00:00:00
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
09:23:50
00:05:09
, 00:00:15
00:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
00:47:48
00:00:56
00:00:06
00:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
02:57:23
00:01:05
00:00:00
00:00:00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
02:02:05
00:00:08
00:00:00
00:00:00
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
17:14:33 ,
00:41:23
00:03:16
00:00:00
24
Eagan
Cha el Ln. & Wren Ln.
05:46:35
00:06:45
00:00:00
00:00:00
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
07:14:10
00:00:21
00:00:00
00:00:oo
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
04:46:36
00:02:39
00:00:00
00:00:00
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
09:11:03
00:09:54
00:00:03
00:00:01
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
25:59:47
00:23:36
00:00:27
00:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
08:37:22
00:05:56
00:00:00
00:00:00
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
23:00:15
01:35:12
00:06:48
00:00:00
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
02:20:13
00:01:55
00:00:01
00:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
00:50:20
00:00:01
00:00:00
00:oo:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
01:36:46
00:00:42
00:00:00
00:00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
00:42:48
00:00:21
00:00:00
00:00:00
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
04:20:20
00:05:29
00:00:04
00:00:00
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
01:48:41
00:01:03
00:00:00
00:00..-Oo
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
02:52:15
00:02:37
00:00:00
00:00:00
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
04:48:56
00:03:29
00:00:00
00:00:00
39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles Pl. 07:10:07 00:06:03 00:00:00 00:00:00
-20- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Arrival Related Noise Events
Arrival mirliva
0 g. iR
gliiI
RMT"MW:NVi:41 fl VA
I.N .. .......
PC tEvents > Events > , Events > Events .!
Nh R 1`1 K0 0
H B
hMN ..... ... .. . . ........... ....... . .. ....
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41st St.
4707
31
0
0
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
4141
243
1
0
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
3998
678
5
0
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
4173
316
1
0
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
4177
2932
54
0
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
4383
3532
152
2
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
126
7
0
0
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
48
1
0
0
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
3
0
0
0
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
4
0
0
0
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
1
0
0
0
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
2
0
0
0
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
58
0
0
0
14
Eagan
1 st St. & McKee St.
5405
22
0
0
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
172
11
0
0
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
3765
744 1
3
0
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
6
1
0
0
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
152
1
1
0
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
49
6
0
0
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
4
0
0
0
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
66
0
0
0
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
3003
3
0
0
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
655
4
0
0
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
5232
49
0
0
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
164
2
0
0
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
451
0
0
0
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
56
1
0
0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
388
14
0
0
.29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
4
0
.0
0
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
1257
2
0
0
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
3
0
0
0
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
3
0
0
0
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
3
0
0
0
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
31
0
0
0
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
1801
7
0
0
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
2303
1
0
0
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
10
0
0
0
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
3
0 1
0
0
39
Eagan
3477 St. Charles P1.
8
0
0
0
.... . ......
t s g: 06.,
-51 ven nlil
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 21 -
Departure Related Noise Events
October 2008
HDeparture Departure Departure Departure
RMT sHIM
ev ents >
U; 4
U .,i mTA r
UM
............ ...... .. V,
g,
j T
Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 770 12 0 0
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
949
38
1
0
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
1751
65
4
0
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
2239
119
8
0
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
5698
944
214
2
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
7338
2514
382
9
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
3087
289
7
0
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
2303
203
3
0
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
16
1
0
0
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
25
6
5
0
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
18
5
3
0
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
17
0
0
0
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
1569
29
0
.0
14
Eagan
I st St. & McKee St. --1524
174
3
0
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
2060
88
2
0
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
1469
243
23
0
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
87
22
9
0
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
2890
261
21
0
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
1798
75
4
0
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
136
9
1
0
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
620
16
0
0
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
355
4
0
0
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
2590
301
42
0
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
928
90
0
0
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
847
7
0
0
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
913
35
0
0
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
1756
107
1
0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
4156
270
4
1
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S.
1569
62
0
0
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
3551
551
94
0
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
488
12
0
0
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
177
0
0
0
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
3-13
—8
0
0
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
129
6
0
0
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
731
61
2
0
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
299
18
0
0
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
4-57
—40
0
0
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
795
49
6
0
39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles Pl. 1211 78 0
P
0
- 22 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
r
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#1)
Xerxes Ave. & 41st St., Minneapolis
Date/T�me Flight Numbera ,t Aircraft T
N ii
D P.acture;.'N vil H: "N' M, R,
TIP. i nn.._
�.F,� l' V I t. . i :, i
10/22/200815:18
NWA587
8757
A
12R
89.4
10/21/200813:37
NWA802
B757
A
12R
88.8
10/04/200811:16
NWA1 542
A320
A
12L
87.6
10/15/200815:19
NWA19
8744
D
22
86.1
10/04/200811:17
NWA1542
A320
A
12L
85.9
10/05/2008 5:52
NWA795
DC9Q
A
12R
85.9
10/25/200815:25
NWA19
8744.
D
22
84.3
10/20/200815:16
NWA19
B744
D
30L
83.5
10/24/200815:24
NWA19
8744
D
22
83.3
10/27/200815:20
NWA19
B744
D
30L
83.2
(RMT Site#2)
Fremont Ave.. & 43rd St., Minneapolis
ER Of, Number ... .a.. .. .
J . k Runway .. .... ...
M.. H VupI!j .......... . T
u.1! itn .. . . .. .
... ... ... ... i M
10/29/2008 5:33
NWA154
B757
A
12L
96.6
10/13/200815:18
NWA19
B744
D
30L
90
10/05/200812:23
NWA497
DC9Q
A
12L
89.9
10/29/2008 13:02
NWA790
DC9Q
A
12L
89.2
10/30/200810:07
NWA923
A319
A
12R
88.9
10/05/200812:10
NWA494
DC9Q
A
12L
88
10/05/2008 21:23
NWA145
DC9Q
A
12L
87.9
10/26/2008 22:42
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
30R
87.8
10/17/200815:13
NWA19
6744
D
22
86.8
10/06/2008 8:40
NWA789
DC9Q
A
12L
86.4
(RMT Site#3)
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis
MOIR. -UMN-g" i P i
M K: TM- T. M71
)P
10/11/2008 22:10
NWA9845
8757
A
12R
99.1
10/22/200815:19
NWA587
B757
A
12R
98.2
10/21/200813:38
NWA802
B757
A
12R
97.1
10/20/200815:15
NWA19
B744
D
30L
92.7
10/13/200815:18
NWA19
B744
D
30L
92.6
10/29/200816:43
NWA780
8757
A
12R
92.2
10/10/200810:15
NWA451
DC9Q
A
12R
91.3
10/27/200815:19
NWA19
B744
D
30L
91.1
10/01/200815:13
NWA19
8744
D
30L
90.5
10/23/2008 7:15
CC1706
B72Q
A
12R
89.8
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 -23-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
(RMT Site#4)
Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis
Mt. VON
PT, H -5-N M
10/22/2008 5:34 NWA1 54 B757 A 12L 96.8
10/08/200811:57
NWA1 150,
DC9Q
D
30R
95.1
10/20/2008 22:43
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
93.7
10/14/200813:19
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30L
93.6
10/02/2008 23:32
CC1705
B72Q
D
30L
93.5
10/02/2008 22:48
NWA9800
B742
D
30L
93.3
10/24/200813:42
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30L
91.3
10/08/200813:17
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30L
91.2
10/25/2008 7:09
NWA736
DC9Q
D
30L
90.6
10/02/2008 22:36 1
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
89.7
(RMT Site#5)
12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis
Date/T�me ' Flight Number] Ircra
IF IT
M. U.111 t R !j;;R
,..N.;—
10/02/2008 22:47
NWA9800
B742
D
30L
101.3,
10/08/200813:07
RPN342
B72Q
D
30L
100.4
10/16/200810:34
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
98.1
10/13/200816:55
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
97.9
10/01/200815:13
NWA19
B744
D
30L
97.8
10/08/200815:30
NWA1492
DC9Q
D
30L
97.4
10/01/200812:06
NWA1 150
DC9Q
D
30L
97.4
10/15/200816:54
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
97.4
10/16/200817:06
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
97.3
10/17/200815:19
NWA1459
DC9Q
D
30L
97.1
(RMT Site#6)
25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis
Date/!
V NKH iHl
.U"N'
M`n R.0 ei!
iw It i A
nnpg! 1'rn '.'L. Rw
I —, 11 M!"W.—I
10/19/200813:14
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30R
102.2
10/13/2008 21:49
NWA1 148
DC9Q
D
30R
101.7
10/14/2008,18:53
NWA9751
B757
A
12L
101.5
10/02/200813:25
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30R
101.4
10/22/2008 5:35
NWA1 54
8757
A
12L
101.2
10/16/200813:32
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30R
101.1
10/01/200813:40
NWA1068
DC9Q
D
30R
100.9
10/16/2008 20:18
NWA1741
DC9Q
D
30R
100.5
10/26/2008 21:12
NWA1 741
DC9Q
D
30R
100.3
10/25/200813:22
NWA238W
DC9Q
D
30R
100.1
- 24 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#7)
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.. Richfield
Um Aircraft , npx B
D dr,
tf 0*
� m N,
0
IQ if - I. MT i� M I A Ali. 1
P, 9 8M,"r.if IKIIM
10/07/2008 23:32
CC11705
B72Q
D
30L
94.6
10/03/200815:42
NWA1492
DC9Q
D
30L
93
10/24/2008 16:51
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
92.5
10/01/2008 7:20
CC11706
B72Q
D
30L
91
10/03/200814:14
AAL1227
MD80
D
30L
90.5
10/25/2008 8:05
DALI 747
MD80
D
30L
90.3
10/31/2008 7:53
DAL798
MD80
D
30L
90.1
10103/2008 6:42
DALI 747
MD80
D
30R
89.9
10/02/200811:39
NWA128
DC9Q
D
30L
89.9
10/13/200815:38
NWA1492
DC9Q
D
30L
89.5
(RMT Site#8)
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis
M il vima..
RN
r, Inn. 'w'Nm'Uh', if
tfit n P; V fi-Ift-MiV YC Departure RK �J
10/24/2008 22:45
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
93.2
10/16/2008 20:19
NWA1741
DC9Q
D
30R
91.3
10/24/200816:51
AAL1854
MD80
D
30R
90.7
10/13/2008 22:42
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
89.8
10/15/2008 22:35
DHL197
B72Q
D
30L
89
10/31/200814:48
NWA865
DC9Q
D
30R
88.9
10/24/200815:26
AAL352
MD80
D
30R
88.9
10/01/200816:46
AAL1854
MD80
D
30R
88.9
10/15/200814:19
NWA766
DC9Q
D
30L
88.4
10/13/200811:44
AAL368
MD80
D
30R
87.9
(RMT Site#9)
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul
ime.- NTi.19,01,M.Um B.,AIr tW111!®Runway L ax(d ), i
,111,,J'i fKV N"E
DI.. �0' Wp. qUK
M
10/22/200815:34
NWA1 9
B744
D
04
84.2
10/23/200810:51
TCA1
UKN
D
12R
79.6
10/10/200815:15
NWA1 9
B744
D
04
79
10/17/200816:11
NWA435
A320
A
30R
74.4
10/17/2008 6:44
BMJ66
BE80
D
12R
73.5
10125/200817:30
NWA1 53
A319
A
30R
73.3
10/17/2008 6:51
BMJ72
BE80
D
12L
73
10/17/2008 6:52
BMJ48
BE80
D
12R
72.9
10/08/2008 6:47
BMJ70
BE80
D
12L
71.5
10/11/2008 7:50
BMJ52
BE80
D
12R
69.9
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 25 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#1 0)
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul
(RMT Site#1 1)
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul
. '. . . p . . R. M
&Q I I !;i .........
BAN Iris U U! . . ... M Runway"'MN!
V: mg, 'T
4 i'2
-A
"R pp
SEI JM i MH 24 m N m
MW a 1 M
PgAritor
ME! U.-
11,111.1f: 19H, i iST; -0�4'
ri H 1 4"". t V RE
H H H
T De 9
'141 , F; .'
10/03/200815:15
NWA19
B744
. .. .. .....
. . . ... .
04
10/10/200815:15
NWA19
B744
D
04
98.5
10/03/200815:14
NWA19
B744
D
04
93.7
10/31/200817:43
NWA19D
B744
D
04
93.4
10/22/200815:33
NWA19
8744
D
04
92.1
10/23/200815:19
NWA19
B744
D
04
90.2
10/17/2008 6:46
BMJ62
BE80
D
.12R
80.6
10/18/200814:12
VIKNG01
Unknown
A
30R
77.7
10/04/2008 7:24
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
75.3
10/17/2008 6:36
BMJ54
BE80
D
12R
74.4
10/04/2008 7:47
BMJ68
BE99
D
12R
72.3
(RMT Site#1 1)
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul
. '. . . p . . R. M
&Q I I !;i .........
BAN Iris U U! . . ... M Runway"'MN!
V: mg, 'T
4 i'2
K
j jK
-11E
"R pp
SEI JM i MH 24 m N m
NWA368
PgAritor
ifliN
30R
10/03/200815:15
NWA19
B744
D
04
96.5
10/23/200815:20
NWA19
B744
D
04
93.3
10/31/200817:44
NWA19D
8744
D
04
93.2
10/10/200815:15
NWA19
B744
D
04
89.1
10/22/200815:33
NWA19
B744
D
04
86.1
10/15/2008 23:08
CC1705
B72Q
D
30L
76.9
10/17/2008 6:46
BMJ62
BE80
D
12R
76.8
10/0412008 7:25
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
75.9
10/14/2008 23:32
TCA1
UKN
D
17
75.1
10/17/200816:11
NWA435
A320
A
30R
74.9
(RMT Site#12)
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paul
�4 Dae/Time' HE lqli H
'.0- ggg-m g g",
j. U. Ou y.
'Runway
E;Vfml
4 r, Mgt
H P
10/07/200812:00
NWA368
B757
A
30R
78.7
10/22/2008 21:41
MES3041
SF314
D
12L
78.6
10/23/2008 6:33
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
74.7
10/30/2008 8:40
XFLC66
BE20
D
12R
74.2
10/27/2008 20:11
BMJ53
BE80
A
35
74.2
10/17/2008 6:44
BMJ66
BE80
D
12R
73.4
10/17/2008 6:40
BMJ58
BE99
D
12L
72.2
10/17/2008 6:50
B J72
BE80
D
12L
72
10/11/2008 7:49
BMJ52
BE80
D
12R
71.8
10/11/200819:55
NWA46
A330
D
12R
70.3
-26- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#1 3)
Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights
if is is is R is
. .. . ..... Miiii sil'.1 Departure H", Of ii
'g P "i V .i Rl P-'
10/30/2008 21:22
NWAI 148
DC9Q
D
12L
85.9
10/18/2008 21:26
NWAI 148
DC9Q
D
12L
83
10/05/200814:21
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
82.9
10/30/2008 21:11
NWA796
DC9Q
D
12L
82.7
10/11/200812:04
NWAI 150
DC9Q
D
12L
82.6
10/08/2008 6:54
BMJ48
BE80
D
12L
82.2
10/06/200814:57
NVVA865
DC9Q
D
12L
82.1
10/04/200813:16
NWA1238
DC9Q
D
12L
82
10/10/200819:11
NWA606
DC9Q
D
12L
81.8
10/12/2008 21:14
NWA796
DC9Q
D
12L
81.6
(RMT Site#14)
1 st St. & McKee St.. Eagan
p llm!15
l,
xiii: jl—Q�jPi r, j:I1lfl"Hifi: giml:p:l'ssi: j Pl IP UIAV' V.
If A NP;
Im g E "0mINs $tR P TOn
10/30/2008 23:26
CC1705
B72Q
D
12R
93.2
10/06/200815:27
NWA19
B744
D
12R
92.5
10/14/2008 22:45
DHLI 97
B72Q
D
12R
90.2
10/14/2008 23:00
CC1705
B72Q
D
12R
89.4
10/04/200815:24
NWA3
B744
D
12R
89.4
10/05/200815:17
NWA19
B744
D
12R
89
10/21/200815:19
NWA19
B744
D
12R
88.9
10/19/2008 8:50
AAL1 183
MD80
D
12R
87.8
10/30/2008 7:53
DAL798
MD80
D
12R
87.6
10/30/2008 23:22
Unknown
GLF2
D
12R
87.4
(RM -1 Site#1 5)
Cullon St. & Lexinaton Ave., Mendota Heights
q-0 'P Il'ZOf
u MR Departure fiTfIT,
LIH. .. '..
10/05/200819:03
NVVA606
DC9Q
D
12L
92
10/29/2008 20:08
NWAl 741
DC9Q
D
12L
90.9
10/30/2008 21:22
NWAI 148
DC9Q
D
12L
88.3
10/22/200819:03
AAL1 358
MD80
D
12L
88.3
10/06/200811:55
NWA1 150
DC9Q
D
12L
88
10/12/2008 22:28
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
87.8
10/23/2008 21:26
NWA1 148
DC9Q
D
12L
86.5
10/22/200811:59
NWA1 150
DC9Q
D
12L
86.2
10/05/2008 20:13
NWA1 741
DC9Q
D
12L
85.3
10/12/2008 21:32
NWA1 148
DC9Q
D
12L
85.1
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 27 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#1 6)
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane, Eagan
Hit Flight Numbers , C raft Type 14 Arrwal!
k,*Il.j ""11 ..... I I .... i
1, 'U
il ji 1, vE. illi.MIIIH P.,
t1111, t I
If F. 4 111 ". H'�
if I NP Elf Mill
if
.1 . I., -
if . -M- i, !! I
-r il - 11.1 U
IM I
I 111
I . 11 1,11 "Eiiilj
it
. :- :-
Y' -
--H
"if ;i;" � if 4 Nii'�
11 11 1
10/09/2008 0:40
NWA9850
8757
A
30L
96.6
10/24/200810:43
NWA454
DC9Q
D
12R
96
10/13/2008 7:01
NWA456
DC9Q
D
12R
95.5
10/30/200813:17
NWA1 068
DC9Q
D
12R
94.3
10123/200810:39
NWA454
DC9Q
D
12R
93.7
10/06/200815:26
NWA19
8744
D
12R
93.7
10/23/200813:18
NWAI 068
DC9Q
D
12R
93.4
10/06/200813:18
NWAI 068
DC9Q
D
12R
92.6
10/29/200813:25
NWAI 068
DC9Q
D
12R
92.5
10/17/200812:27
DAL1621
MD80
D
12R
92.5
(RMT Site#1 7)
84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington
D' - if
if
RPR- iR
I ..... .. if
...
10/07/200815:29
NWA19
B744
D
22
94.3
10/25/200815:34
NWA3
B744
D
22
94.1
10/14/200815:15
NWA19
B744
D
22
92.1
10/24/200815:23
NWA19
B744
D
22
92
10/26/200815:20
NWA19
8744
D
22
91.9
10/12/200815:18
NWA19
B744
D
22
91.7
10/17/200815:12
NWA19
B744
D
22
90.6
10/16/200815:21
NWA19
B744
D
22
90.4
10/09/200815:20
NWA19
B744
D
22
90.3
10/15/200815:17
NWA19
B744
D
22
89
(RMT Site#1 8)
75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfield
. Mr, !i " 1-11M.
iN 11A." --l' i --- . �
�Z- .1 . ilk5 t -
el fi �ti
I rn e fit 'eti,ag "U Number" T
61"y
n � 1.1
I'5,"A -00 U.,
U
.'I if -gpqn-,
RunwaH
dB
Rq!
niLmax
i iHl lu
MON. fil, 'IRI i
"Mi MRMIS`
"'m
it VF5
10/11/200815:42
NWA3
B744
D
22
99.1
10/12/200815:18
NWA19
B744
D
22
98.9
10/08/200815:35
NWA19
B744
D
22
98.7
10/26/200815:20
NWA19
B744
D
22
98.4
10/18/200815:30
NWA3
B744
D
22
98.4
10/30/200815:04
NWA19
B744
D
22
98.1
10/24/200815:23
NWA19
8744
D
22
97.8
10/25/200815:34
NWA3
8744
D
22
97.7
10/15/200815:17
NWA19
8744
D
22
97.6
10/14/200815:14
NWA19
B744
D
22
97.3
-28- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#1 9)
16th Ave. & 84th St.. Bloominaton
mAlk, i�lmgsiyqi' RunwayumMM5k dB
is"I .i
V ji 16Departure-1
1 1 "Ni 'I Ulgiti 11Su
is
10/11/200815:33
NWA19
B744
D
22
93.5
10/301200815:04
NWA19
B744
D
22
91.9
10/181200815:30
NWA3
B744
D
22
91.4
10/11/200815:42
NWA3
B744
D
22
90.5
10/181200815:24
NWA19
B744
D
22
88.2
10/24/200815:23
NWA19
B744
D
22
86.2
10/15/200815:17
NWA19
8744
D
22
86.1
10/25/200815:34
NWA3
8744
D
22
85.8
10/26/200815:20
NWA19
B744
D
22
85.8
10/06/200814:21
NWA766
DC9Q
D 1
17
84.6
(RMT Site#20)
75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield
Mzsi"Pss� W. -T N.
M -
P M "41; !i` P
NumberP.p
Hl H-'MMMM Hi
1 Oil 7,11M 5 i"g —1 1I.M H."
9"s, M -Mi I N MwiL Pi in
10/08/200815:35
NWA19
B744
D
22
92
10/02/200818:44
NWA1 9D
8744
D
22
87.9
10/25/200812:30
DAU 621
MD80
D
30L
83.8
10/15/200815:17
NWA19
B744
D
22
82.5
10/25/2008 8:55
DAL798
MD80
D
30L
81.5
10/19/200812:33
DALI 621
MD80
D
30L
81
10/27/2008 22:03
FDX1207
DC10
D
30L
80.6
10101/2008 22:04
FDX1618
DC10
D
30L
80.4
10/17/200815:12
NWA19
B744
D
22
80.2
10108/2008 22:11
FDX1618
DC10
D
30L
79.8
(RMT Site#21)
Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heiqhts
--t,,.i,i.,....,-i;.".., i4"q111N�: ;.�- Aircraft Type onsE.
6r!M":1
Fhgh# Number VM!, Runway
izb
. MIFF is
BE T: u H,
A, MU is is tl! U.Rsig fl;
0104/200815:18
10104/200815:18
NWA1 9
B744
D
12R
84
10/18/200818:54
RCH835
DC10
D
12R
82.9
10/06/200811:27
NWAI 746
DC9Q
D
12L
82.6
10/04/200815:24
NWA3
B744
D
12R
82.6
10/05/200815:18
NWA19
B744
D
12R
82.5
10/05/2008 22:16
NWA9802
B742
D
12R
82.4
10/06/2008 5:40
DAU 073
MD80
D
12R
82
10/17/200812:01
NWAI 150
DC9Q
D
12L
81.9
10/17/200811:20
NWA1 746
DC9Q
D
12L
81.6
10/06/2008 6:41
DAU 747
MD80
D
12R
81.5
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
-29-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#22)
Anne Marie Trail- Inver Gmvp Hpinht.-,
1366 1.1.. 1
IJ J.-
Type
p
NWA1150
V
D
E
Vr.' H-Hki
,'
R31 1 Syb
MIN LF h - NIMUL
k ` I I.! - H, -
v 1]., 4 MRIT
N
10/05/200812:02
NWA1 150
DC9Q
D
5 i
HH,
'14
10/27/200811:03
AWE1845
E190
A
30L
81.4
10/06/2008 21:40
NWA9804
B742
D
12R
80.7
10/0912008 7:38
NWA395
A320
A
30L
80.6
10/13/2008 5:35
DALI 073
MD80
D
12R
80.6
10108/2008 7:55
DAL798
MD80
D
12R
80.5
10/08/2008 6:50
DALI 747
MD80
D
12R
80.1
10/09/200812:54
NWAI 13
A320
A
30L
80
10/26/200814:18
NWA1459
DC9Q
A
30R
80
10/24/2008 7:57
DAL798
MD80
D
12R
79.8
10/10/200811:15
DAL651
MD80
D
12R
79.5
(RMT Site#23)
End of Kenndon Ave__ Mpntlntq Hp-inhfi-,
Ell A
MIT.
FIR, EN"
10/11/200812:04
NWA1150
DC9Q
D
12L
96.1
10/05/200812:02
NWA1 150
DC9Q
D
12L
95
10/30/2008 22:29
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
94.7
10/18/200813:40
NWA1238
DC9Q
D
12L
94.4
10/30/200821:22
NWA1 148
DC9Q
D
12L
94.3
10/18/2008 14:26
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
94.1
10/30/2008 21:11
NWA796
DC9Q
D
12L
93.9
10/12/2008 21:31
NWA1148
DC9Q
D
12L
93.8
10/16/2008 22:31
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
93.4
10/21/200811:50
NWA1 150
DC9Q
D
12L
93
(i -mil zmegZ4)
ChaDel Ln- & WrPn I n Fnnqn
rl
gm� - Aircraft "YP --gi
b, li ht Number
A;: fe/li, '. T 4 i , ' - - - ,
NNE,!
. wg-.� k R.g
r. i,' py, VNI al t.
, - ii1j" 01.1, R 11. MIMMO-',
M P V, !Ill
"AH
4
10/14/200810:19
Unknown
LJ25
A
30L
88.8
10/26/200813:08
AAL450
MD80
A
30L
86
10/06/2008 21:39
NWA9804
B742
D
12R
86
10/30/2008 23:26
CC1705
B72Q
D
12R
86
10/11/200812:23
DAL1621
MD80
D
12R
85.4
10/06/2008 7:51
DAL798
MD80
D
12R
85
10/11/2008 6:15
AAL1361
MD80
D
12R
84.6
10/14/2008 23:01
CC1705
B72Q
D
12R
84.1
10/10/2008 5:37
DAL1073
MD80
D
12R
83.7
10/26/200816:01
NWA455
DC9Q
A
30L
83.7
- 30 - Report Generated: 11110/2008 10:19
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#25)
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdv Rd., Eaqan
T.nM6"'1*!;'i!"'*" Ffi-*
Aircraft ' Type ArnvalJ n a Lmd
3. NN MID" w
it N X il t1lin-
ti i MIR
ep qUrej- M
. ......... L H S
Mfl;-i N."
10/30/2008 20:27
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
82.5
10/14/200817:03
NWA682
A320
D
17
82.5
10/05/2008 9:46
AAL2321
MD80
D
17
81.5
10/21/2008 20:50
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
81.5
10/11/200813:40
NWA1048
A319
D
17
81
10/27/200813:57
NWA1 58
B757
A
30L
81
10/14/200812:44
SCX242
B738
A
30L
80.8
10/23/2008 20:37
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
80.6
10114/2008 20:33
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
80.4
10/12/200815:20
NWA19
B744
D
22
80
(RMT Site#26)
6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heiqhts
Number Aircraft tMel, 1111'j..11. ily it '. ' -1i "Hill' '11 -.-,
A 0 M 'iiNjFfigh. 11'.jo"!i��!; 1411W
WN Departure .50 it
p
10105/2008 22:16
NWA9802
B742
D
12R
88.6
10/06/200815:27
NWA19
B744
D
12R
84.9
10/05/200815:18
NWA19
8744
D
12R
84.9
10/13/2008 7:54
DAL798
MD80
D
12R
84
10/13/2008 6:42
DALI 747
MD80
D
12R
83.2
10/11/2008 6:48
DAU 747
MD80
D
12R
82.9
10104/2008 6:25
NWA9818
B742
D
12R
82.9
10/11/2008 6:24
AAL1718
MD80
D
12R
82.7
10/21/2008 23:22
CC1705
B72Q
D
12R
82.1
10/04/200815:24
NWA3
B744
D
12R
82.1
(RMT Site#27)
Anthony School 5757 Irvinq Ave. S., Minneapolis
V` D t"
R. W P. it.tc it V
4,;Departure. "1"
10/08/200813:08
RPN342
B72Q
D
30L
91
10/17/200817:02
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
89.1
10/04/2008 5:46
DALI 073
MD80
D
30L
87.3
10/15/200816:54
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
87.3
10/13/200815:53
DAU 137
MD80
D
30L
86.7
10/08/200811:57
DAL651
MD80
D
30L
86.5
10/17/200815:13
NWA19
B744
D
22
86.4
10/27/2008 7:54
DAL798
MD80
D
30L
86.4
10/271200817:47
AAY5273
MD80
D
30L
86.3
10/08/200810:50
AALI 180
MD80
D
30L
86.3
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 -31 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#28)
6645 16th Ave- q-- Rir.hfiplri
41 Off, Date/T�me Fh ht Number M. T ircraft Yp -MON, Un
if if f! if
i- , "HIM
.if ifAC
'HI !Ufi� L If
If
10/01/200813:02 DAU 621 MD80 D 30L 100.5
10/07/200811:36
NWA452
DC9Q
D
30L
94.2
10/27/2008 7:32
NWA866
DC9Q
D
30L
92.1
10/26/2008 8:47
AAL1 183
MD80
D
30L
90.4
10/26/200811:26
DAL651
MD80
D
30L
89.8
10/03/200818:01
AWE528
A320
D
30R
89.5
10/02/200811:32
AALI 180
MD80
D
30L
88.6
10/17/200816:13
NWA1465
DC9Q
D
30L
88.4
10/18/2008 7:20
N A1470
DC9Q
D
17
87.7
10/26/200816:18
NWA1492-j
DC9Q
D
30L
-87.-2
(RMT Site#29)
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31.-,t AvP R Minnp:4nnlicz
Date/Time lMV BIT
Flight Number, a
U!"
'I if I! if n5 r3
M-; , I ii3,,.,,, m
0.' P9 14.
10/27/200814:25
AAL593
MD80
D
30R
88.3
10/07/2008 20:41
DHL304
B72Q
D
30R
87.9
10/09/200815:28
AAL352
MD80
D
30R
87.5
10/19/200819:03
AAL1358
MD80
D
30R
87.4
10/13/2008 22:53
CC1705
B72Q
D
30L
87.3
10/15/2008 20:00
AAL1358
MD80
D
30R
86.6
10/13/2008 20:38
EHL304
-AAL368
B72Q
D
30L
86.1
10/14/200811:34
NWA736
MD80
D
30R
85.9
10/01/200815:26
AAL352
MD80
D
30R
85.3
10/13/200814:05
AAL593
MD80
D
30R.
85
(mvi i zjitegm)
8715 River Ridop Rd RInnminntr)n
-M 0M
A Z, : 0 Type :.,.,.;�TY4 �.. :^ ', 11 4` x$;. t,� 9.. I� �'J'tpC,' C jI 5n! ;;.__ l Fy i 1. .vvl i a!?{ ,Y artUre ' ',} x,',t i! i ++� ry, �`,'r i F,'S `2,`�K�,'� ` iF }i'.,
VIE 2
P
5i
10/10/200811.42
NWA128
DC9Q
D
17
95
10/06/200811:52
NWA1 527
DC9Q
D
17
94.9
10/31/2008 22:24
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
94.7
10/22/2008 7:39
NWA866
DC9Q
D
17
94.7
10/05/200819:23
NWA1 53-5
DC9Q
D
17
94.7
10/23/200811:38
NWA1231
DC9Q
D
17
94.3
10/27/2008 23:01
CC1705
B72Q
D
17
94.2
10/23/2008 7:11
NWA736
DC9Q
D
17
94.1
10/22/200811:57
NWM 23-1
DC9Q
D
17
93.8
10/10/2008 7:19
NWAI 38
DC9Q
D
17
93.8
- 32 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#31)
9501 12th Ave. S.. Bloomington
io�.D i
U 'A LmaX(dB)
'Tij,Alt
hit AIMFWR7
(.I 1Ifli: MIA::
D it,. n
M gj:
10/12/200815:19
NWA19
B744
D
22
89.6
10/29/2008 15:17
NWA19
B744
D.
22
89
10/18/200815:24
NWA19
B744
D
22
88.6
10/18/200815:31
NWA3
B744
D
22
87.1
10/11/200815:43
NWA3
B744
D
22
86.8
10/30/200815:05
NWA19
8744
D
22
84.6
10/11/200815:33
NWA19
B744
D
22
84.5
10/22/200813:32
AAL1227
MD80
D
17
84.3
10/05/200811:31
NWAI 527
DC9Q
D
17
82.8
10/10/200818:27
NWA9850
B742
D
17
82.1
(RMT Site#32)
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.. Bloominaton
Rim., Um
:Nffi, U*MR
J QIY!iPe it . - N
10/09/2008 22:57
NWA145
DC9Q
D
17
79.9
10/25/2008 8:06
DAU 747
MD80
D
30L
79.4
10/16/2008 6:46
DAU 747
MD80
D
30L
78.7
10/27/2008 22:34
NWA871
DC9Q
D
17
78.6
10/15/2008 6:37
DAL1747
MD80
D
30L
77.7
10/10/200818:27
NWA9850
B742
D
17
77.7
10/27/2008 22:05
FDXI 618
DC10
D
30L
77.6
10/05/200811:32
NWA1 527
DC9Q
D
17
j 77.2
10/25/200810:36
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
-76.8
10/19/200814:29
NWA1270
DC9Q
D
30L
76.6
(RMT Site#33)
North River Hills Park. Burnsville
"E"
fif..-YP I,V
"IITI,
Rv
R Rilz.
it 14
rM e Tj_Departure
E ti
Ps
it
OUAI, .. . . ......
V. ItI !,Nfu- . t
10/24/200810:52
)ML1 180
MD80
D
17
84.8
10/31/2008 22:25
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
83
10/24/200813:36
AAL1227
MD80
D
17
81.9
10/11/200811:23
NWA1 527
DC9Q
D
17
81.8
10/02/2008 6.14
AAL1361
MD80
D
17
81.7
10/20/2008 23.20
CC1705
B72Q
D
17
80.4
10/05/200819:33
NWA1461
DC9Q
D
17
80.3
10/27/2008 23:02
CC1-705
B72Q
D
17
80.2
10/11/200819:28
NWA1535 j
DC9Q
D
17
80
10/17/200811:40
NWA1231 I
DC9Q
D
17
79.8
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19 - 33 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Site#34)
Red Oak Park, Burnsville
Q -T H-hll"!'�!! 41", 06RA"': xlglia.
, m
j9- a i.�l 1;�i! "g,
0 111*z�Rg�.!,Iq'I!�'
NWA456
mf n j H .1 TOM
,.I. jli� mng � ii *��.�. - " jli�r'
zz -' ' I NO! ENE
Fl 'j 'H"�� I � I I il zi
Mir; i U Ve P N11; lit �R.M i�
10/20/2008 23:20
CC1705
B72Q
D
."m
17
81.7
10/31/2008 22:25
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
80.9
10/15/2008 6:06
AALI 361
MD80
D
17
80.6
10/08/2008 22:29
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
80.5
10/01/2008 22:28
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
80.4
10/05/200815:37
NWAI 176
DC9Q
D
17
80.3
10/27/2008 23:02
CC1705
B72Q
D
17
79.6
10/05/200815:34
AAL352.
MD80
D
17'
79.6
10/1612008 6:28
AALI 718
MD80
D
17
77.6
10/13/200810:32 1
NWA498
DC9Q
D
17
77.6
(RMT Site#35)
2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan
Date/Time-
0 111*z�Rg�.!,Iq'I!�'
NWA456
I DC9Q
.......... .qi
R
k gw
ii;gm
82.7
10/08/2008 23:06
CC1705
Ul
rMt
ii.
10/08/2008 23:05
CC1705
B72Q
D
17
90.7
10/08/2008 20:38
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
90.3
10/02/2008 7:05
CC14711
B72Q
D
17
86.6
10/09/2008 6:10
AALI 361
MD80
D
17
85.9
10/29/200815:18
NWA19
8744
D
22
84.9
10/15/2008 6:23
AAL1718
MD80
D
17
84.8
10/17/2008 8:58
AAL1 183
MD80
D
17
84.5
10/09/2008 6:46
NWA448
DC9Q
D
17
84.2
10/21/200815:25
AAL352
MD80
D
17
84.1
10/02/2008 6:18
AALI 718
MD80
D
17
83.7
(RMT Site#36)
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, Apple Valley
a 6-1-j"r1m, ... a F,Iigtit Number Aircraft Typeh s"Imf., MIAMI -
5 R n 'E' 11-I! RIPH.
Departure H"'I.Q.; HH `Nfl
4 L51. MN, P; 'n v U::-
10/15/2008 9:41 NWA437 B757 A 35 848
10/25/2008 7:05
NWA456
I DC9Q
D
17
82.7
10/08/2008 23:06
CC1705
B72Q
D
17
82.6
10/01/2008 22:28
DHL197
B72Q
D
17
82.3
10/25/2008 6:52
NWA448
DC9Q
D
17
81.4
10/19/200811:33
NWA605
DC9Q
D
17
81.4
10/15/2008 7:08
NWA456.
DC9Q
D
17
81.3
10/08/2008 20:38
DHL304
B72Q
D
17
80.8
10/02/2008 6:48
NWA448
DC9Q
D
17
80.8
10/02/2008 7:06
CC14711
B72Q
D
17
80.7
- 34 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Top Ten Loudest ---
Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
October 2008
(RMT Siteg.171
(HMT Sitpitqpi
(HMT Sit,-,u-qai
October 2008 Remote
The top ten noise events mon"torin Tower Too Ten Summar
departure operations, and the event ranges a! each RMT fo
events. The predominant top r October 2008 were comprised of go %
3
ten aircraft tYpe was the DCgQ with 30.5% of the hi of
Lmax
October 2008 Technical Advisor Re Ort rt WZ I �en
Unknown fields are due to unavailZblil�ity �o _�v
Month Of October 2008. f FAA flight "'g—, track, �ddala, Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the
19
report G�enerated�.
1111012�008 jo.�
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
October 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
- 36 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
=mom==
EMMOMMMOMMMMMMMM
MWOOMMMMMMMMM
mom
MMMMMM
==mom=
IMMO
MM'S
MMOMMM
EWA*
OMMMMMM
e======
MMMMMMMMM
EDIPM, IMMOMMM
mmmmmm
mom==
MMMMMMMM
==mom===
MMMMOMM
mmmmmm
MMMMM
OMMMM
MM
Bonn
IMES
an
IMESIM
- 36 - Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
October 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
z E!
110/01/2008165.2 51.2 591 55. 1 52" 41.3 57.6 521 60 t) 43.4 46.8 55.9
10/02/2008 67 413,j of.62.5 56.9
.0 . 48.3 46.6 58.3 52.8 61 45.7 52.8 58.3 55.4
10/03/2008 66.1 36.0 60. 421 50.6 56.4 58.4 61.2 53.5 55.1 58.2 611 525
10/04/2008 63.9 41.3 56.9 55.2
9.5 52.1 54.5 62 60 51.7 56.6 55.7 58.6 NA
10/05/2008 63.8 28.7 57.5 53.8 NA 56.8 48.1 66.8 59.1 52.4 59.5 36.6 58.6 25.8
10/06/2008 63.8 37.4 58,6 54.8 NA 57.7 53.8 65.2 59.3 50.5 60.2 33.6 59.9 284
10/07/2008 65.2 53.3 55.9 48.2 47 42.4 57.6 58.2 60.4 48.9 52.6 57.1 60.8 56.2
10/08/2008 67.8 48.3 58.7 54.2 54.4 436 59 60.9 62.4 51.9 55.3 57.4 55.3 55
10/09/2008 68.4 50.1 58.5 54.5 50.3 399 57.8 49.1 61.6 45.1 47.4 53.8 56.8 55.9
10/10/2008 66.4 41.5 5719 55.6 NA 45.6 56.9 65.4 61.4 53.7 54 5 38.8 6119 32.8
10/11/2008 61.3 34.3 59.7 56 NA 56.7 -65.9 58.3 52.4 '58 *9 38.2 55.3 NA
10/12/2008 61 50.6 58.2 50.6 NA 51.4 51.5 65.8 57.1 54 54.9 NA 55.2 NA
10/13/2008 66.1 42.4 50.5 48.2 43.3 51.4 57.7 59.4 61.6 50 58 55.7 59.5 62
10/14/2008 65.1 51.6 58 54.6 45.8 52.5 58.4 65.3 62.3 52.3 58.1 52.8 54.2 50.8
10/15/2008 65.6 53.2 58 54.7 48.1 43 58,3 51.3 61.5 35.6 49.4 58.2 60.2 57.3
10/16/2008 67.7 50.1 59.8 55.8 50.1 50 59.4 64.9 62.5 57.1 54.1 56 59.8 54.6
10/17/2008 68.4 49.9 7. 52.6 43.1 55.8 59.1 66.6 63.6 55.4 58.6 54 55.6 49.
10/18/2008 62.5 48.3 62.2 58.3 35.3 52.7 54.5 65.6 57.3 54.1 56 54.5 60.4 N8A
10/19/2008 64 49 58.4 53.2 44.2 51 56.2 59.4 58.9 42.7 7.8 52.9 56.7 55.5
10/20/2008 63.6 46.6 57.9 54.9 48.5 47.7 55.4 45.1 . 58.9 36.5 45.4 57.9 63 54
10/21/2008 65.9 41.1 59 56.4 42.8 51.4 53 64.9 60.1 54.7 57.6 46.2 62.8 NA
10/22/2008 66.8 35.9 56.3 54 NA 56.9 54.1 66 60.8 53.8 60.9 45 61.7 32.6
10/23/2008 67.8 36.8 59.1 56.2 31-3 50.3 54.6 65.7 60.9 55 53.7 38.4 59.8 A
10/24/2008 67.3 51.3 56.9 53 42.2 40 57 61.9 61.7 52.2 46.6 58.4 57.6 56.5
10/25/2008 65 .7 55 58.7 52.8 51 45.1 57.8 46.2 60.4 46.8 47.8 55.3 56.2 55.3
10/26/2008 66 50.5 55.7 44.4 45.8 59.7 52.7 63.1 44.4 52.5 55.7 59.4 56.6
10/27/2008 64.2 52.5 58-3 . 56.7 533.5 46.7 56.1 47.5 60.2 44.5 48.9 58.4 61 57.4
10/28/2008 65.2 46.7 58.4 54.6 43.1 38.4. 56.4 46.5 58.9 NA 46.4 51.2 54.4 55.3
10/29/2008 65.2 52.9 62.5 59.6 56.2 50.6 56.6 63.9 59.8 51.9 57.3 50.2 59.3 46.8
10/30/2008 65.4 40.6 60.2 55.3 37.9 56.1 57.7 68.3 62.2 53.9 60.4 38.3 57.1 35.9
10/31/2008 64.4 34.5 60.7 56.5 46.8 44.4 56.
1 . . . . . . 44.8 58.6
lVlo
nut, 47.6 44.6 56.1 62.4 56.6
A:-l.Al.n.
Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10: 19
-37-
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
October 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
NPI,
-'MV
q4
mn 15 -
"4. '7-.
1.- -
10/01/2008
65.2
50.9
43.8
50.4
53.6
58.5
58.9
42.4
NA
NA
10/02/2008
65.5
50.8
46.9
52.9
50.4
60.9
59.5
46.9
39.4
NA
10/03/2008
64.8
46.4
48.3
46
48.7
51.6
55.1
39.61
42
49.7
10/04/2008
62.7
62 * 7
46.8
40.6
48
33.7
47.3
25.6
47.9
50.3
53.8
10/05/2008
63.3
49
43.6
43.8
44.5
50.3
43.8
50.6
52.8
55.5
10/06/2008
631.1
48.5
43
44.8
31.2
50.4
40.3
51.8
52.6
55.4
10/07/2008
53.3
42.1
25
NA
NA
50.6
51.8
30.2
33.6
40.7
10/08/2008
66.6
45.9
38
51
51.9
61.4
59.8
47.9
49.1
45.3
10/09/2008
66
48.3
52.7
48.1
45.6
61.3
58.1
51.4
43.6
34.8
10/10/2008
64.1
47.4
40.1
44.1
41.7
48.7
40.2
49.7
54
55
10/11/2008
60.8
49.8
33
46.7
31.6
49.1
42.1
49.6
49.8
53.8
10/12/2008
58.7
49.2
33.9
40.9
39.5
46.3
26.9
48.4
50.3
53.4
10/13/2008
58.8
37.7
42.6
38.7
41.7
50.9
52.2
44.2
46.6
47.51
10/14/2008
64.3
43.2
40.7
43.2
36.2
58.4
55.8
52.2
51.7
52.2
10/15/2008
65.3
46.5
48.9
50.7
50.9
59.8
59.3
45.6
40
NA
10/16/2008
67
.48.8
51
148.4
51.8
57.2
58.6
39.5
39.3
39.6
10/17/2008
62.1
42.5
31.21
43
42.3
52.2
52.6
47.2
50.8
55.5
10/18/2008
65.2
52.4
44.8
49.4
49.2
54.2
50.3
55.2
56.5
57.7
10/19/2008
60.6
42
42.11
50
43
52.4
53.3
41.9
45.4
48.2
10/20/2008
64.3
53.4
47.4153.4,53.1
54.1
55.1
39.6
34.6
NA
10/21/2008
64.4
48.9
41.51
43 141.3
52.5
45.4
51.9
512154.7
10/22/2008
62.8
48.4
44.31
45 126.4
49.4
36.6
49.8
52.7
52.5
10/23/2008
65.4
48.4
42.2
43.1
31.6
51.4
41.4
53.3
53.4
58.8
10/24/2008
63
43.1
43.9
47.4
46.4
53.2
54.2
49.41
50
51.1
10/25/2008
63.2
48.1
43.5
47.6
40
55.9
54.9
43.5
40.2
38
10/26/2008
34
27.5
NA
33.9
36.2
33.8
29.2
NA
26.6
NA
10/27/2008
67.7
44.9
52.1
54.6
53.7
58.3
57.5
43.3
59.2
43.11
10/28/2008
66.2
47.8
48.2
47.8
43.2
60 157.4
42.2
42.5
43.8
10/29/2008
67.7
52.7
46.8
49.9
51.3
55.7
54.6
50 151.8
51.8
10/30/2008
60.5
49.6
45.2
45.4
25.9
44.7
29.1
48.5
52.7
58.5
10/31/2008
68.8
49.2 147.9
155.9155.81
54
57.2
NA
NA 136.81
S .,
1 48 n
.. ... ...
... .....
1154".
-38- Report Generated: 11/10/2008 10:19
November
Oise Oversight Committee (NOC)
Technical visor's Report
?ra O
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport
h -'E AHk a,.{}y • 7� y-�b sj - ,9�7/ :U R Y' .: §3. 1.. ..,
`S h K'..Fi'4."p^Y r. N". .t. T..i' F$"j>;9t N±w S t .?'•G �r J7Y. lu ,�{'1-l'` e }•
�, '1Cy1%i... � �c "
�'�
J�+�V,f'L Y,TPn•'�' 2 X2#3 iF . { f ��L .S�i S 1,� i +`v �.- � 3
c r�l._.� -L�'°: 4n Ytw+;�'^�x1��t`r..�(�s.n a�x•I�R>~'" Yl� i`a '�7T k..5"#�'Tp f•F' � Vr.4hr 'ne..k+s �-.�n��'�'.v,'," t "�:.. ,,I�r�y 't'�.F�.u7ir 7-
't.'#'"`t`��-y''S1�v'-�°cnst.'z4'�,''.1
mP
�•�, c,�j
_'.tlui }.✓J-ys7r ,'". r t.�� L1'h '0s''�" _'S_:3 i:h"fi 1"'F¢�1 #.i^a-�j�4F'liw1'1s1'N+ �.i". 1t,lSxt
IN" F"L M1. C`M�._'h r �i.._1!'t'T' E.xC. `{ "j!Y•rt' ty� s sis t�;�.���-moi �t.�,� 1 T 'sT�� 1
)'ti !`a?sNr`{i :2` f ! I
{ i,iFyPg�ry^�+�+"'I •1 i ..
y t•a•F. "�cSi 1 * �' .f•�..- -{ 1-
{.:.,+"1...`.kc r�'*2 .d'!`Tt ^,llr �.i.Rp.
>' •y. 4",��'"'Y� ✓? ',l, x'F'13i' 3�n1 t' f
x y,i,}
,.x... J -
.fit10,6
s�'a, s
a�r
-��,rt�;�•._ C,�y � N# �:s'�-'s � �°sY�'e�.�.+' �.�y � �"��, trt�,,, �`' ��t� r �u to �,��tr�y... r„n- f � `P�` - '� r-4� kl�+LaSk�'
Y4'titcy 7 >•i's',.'t'r 7�F' �"'F�7St�.,�YF.. yr 4 .f+:t +�,i s�4-yfr�: ��'7�Z
nY3Pj "': i J PN•p`I f� ..IrxJ-y i1 Yt l 'h 4 Y �b�P� 4n,J i C�5-0 'GJ i.ryer S �itY�;; �,}t' „T.
*.��rry�
.{i tG l>,^s`; us, ,`"'tF..fYL;1,. 1 irk S "dnok yc�.F,t iV .�.-bv }�3.
t Fra. >< . - .fit*. ^�ti. ak C'tt a '"fit' ".�J..y°- r?` '1 t �t f.Y vi:"� }j' F` 7Fjr,'n'. r. ,;+- tF +t., t�.pr"t
i' Ire. .� ahh% F 4i �1
',I FrL:
+ xs5 a r f oto k '+F�r'a'�„� { } "{ i #S t t-�. :.•-r [ x y
ffid
+t+E'"n„?i
r it#'�
r,4j�+,';; [�,, k rk
M d� si$t v. ..' de-'''m,,3'�ryr a •",y I �u zz ;� t 'a r,r,�' vi'a'aya�,r'r �' zt
"`y` �v�" ,S�a'?' S� f t S N� n:., asi• >l t � �4 "Y^ v 'h 3 '
k43 RE
a "ad
Y �r� i rlr• �t � :, �%' a rrP ': IS 1.C`"xJ1M ti ,� i �Se�xr�aJ
�if'�" § `"31 n7t�l.u. d+,r,,• t$J1 '��v>; �#i t rA '; Id`'4
ell �•.*�.K't�•[� a �- y4'j" +%i.;f��y�, Y#z} -�„�rda t J;"ay�l .� d
an '� 5`xn irr az i lh �-5y"'ar 4a4'L�..AH{ tilt ,f �y t-,,,1'.•._
06.
r �61'ull =�,,.brr(.,,7thi�J�S-�%'�r'I+f�r'�'Tt't}.., y.,+„.Xf
'"` '�' tS' P� � i -� 3',gyk � faF` mxr� �,SI i t � tr (,� i ,r�' u -�"s� J9 t•� t.. 1 Y }} }„' V .4� •��f�a
•,+r t..”°it'Ir `i '",z�•
ylN� It°t`'�11 �r
.�*,�lY i:f-(.•.r 'W12 �q' f f ry;e3 Iy
fl RA
i f i—i'�c
� �
'tj `fit ��' � °' ° F �
4
xt
,
fl! i i �tl.i"� ��ER,
At� r ' � c i t. h
rN`�.�4'�
_0
"A
r?, k 4 11' xt:, : 1 ._,• a rt i .vP%Sp k ,. r
Y�I'{ J. $t._)ld�F•�'jY,3 t C-
ilFd 1�( f�� ! �
��—'
�j•�lY
[. �!(,�{�
� 'I��'tk�r��"� 14i�
i� t �3y�`e�+.# {i i
NOT
}ry mak✓+ a}}jk )g'11.i l hU*i int 5J �r/4,rK14d 1 (. 9 is M1 .
� � •,
a r�� J >i :GO.•�. t"-i�t { 3 ��
�>fwY-+anti f't.:1s,t it. a
)"`ri jjj7
1 f 11yy��§ � 4`3 �lfiir%� 'N"41 1 �� f ���1 � � �'1`q_ �`Ff•Y�.� .I . f �.
4*ek
��� ��Ff1
iyN i t i4�'13t1 }�T!!P&A•�A J� i'�� .t � pnb 4{! � f+'�"' � �"t11t1 i..S� � I. �� �i{M� OLiS gq
s ry 71•�as,T�`�f J',y l '� +� J i fr y t 4�. EV 4 t F� fNr.
>,g�4e1 J � �x•I f kir' : zt m,, ..5 � � _ ,�L = ! E , :�
1 1
L�;lj � i"' kP' y" L '(`l"�,j' l '}1 4 � � Q i � ,�.-Yj` {Y k •• 5 '>.' c:Y' ?� ..�. 'NG !
1� r�t'•�'� t . 111 � i74 r 1� c it .�.>,•t!
M�tt
�It
t xr<{�"itt: �F'.n` `?�'�xkv y -t �� �w •�'�.+r 44 4. "x,�,,,�m,�.i?i s r Y1� P v't^. �, P 1...+^c "�7M2�`i :. �) 4 `T pk a
..'
t9
�-`�yY
+NP
e of C2001;ontents for November
Complaint Summary
Noise Complaint Map
FAA Available Time for Runway Usage
MSP All Operations Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage
MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators Stage Mix
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map
Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events —
Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT
Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9-11
12
13
14-17
[E:3
19
20
21
22
— 23-35
—36-38
MSP Complaints by City
November 2008
Nature of MSP Complaints
,i, , Coin Iamt
P
Total
Ea, rly/Late
Number of
' Number of a
%of Total '
y
Ml'
'e#rtrvall
Departure
OtSer
Complaints
Frequency
29
City
;
~
11
Helicopter
Gomplamants
Complaints
.. .:.
EAGAN
0
3
555
1'1 r
358
:` 7ti
1358
36
°
48.1%i:
8.1 /o
4550
MINNEAPOLIS
1
p 1
3
: 27 ,
28
53 i
113
20
4%
BLOOMINGTON
0
0
1
16i
5
47
69
17
2.4%
nit
N
APPLE VALLEY
0
i dl 217
0
z 12
6
9
238
8
°
8.4/0
BURNSVILLE
0
2 rc
0
5�
8
1 16
78
6
2.$°/a
:.dJ,::.
d
RICHFIELD
0
0 4'
I
ry4:r i
825
i 4:
834
4
29.6%
.. fi.. ::r...R,'!:
dr:uP....iacr:..-.:,=.n:
......0
MENDOTA
0
0
3�
0
42
3
1.5%
HEIGHTS
r
SAINT LOUIS PARK
17
0
t0
0
4
12
3
0.4%
y i
i
a t
EDINA
0
i':0 rv' r:
. Ot
3
0
S
3
0.2%
INVER GROVE
I hit
t
0
0
0
0'
I
1
2
2
0.1%
HEIGHTS
.,:.n
SOUTH SAINT
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0.1%
PAUL
CHANHASSEN
0
it` .�
r..: :.. 4..,:.:..
0
0 + '
v..::
r.: r,...,:v.:..
0
54
:.,....,....i.,.,.:,:..
54
1
7.9%
SUNFISH LAKE
U
4U
tl
8E-
0
-; U
8
1
0.3%
,,..
EDEN PRAIRIE
0
0^
0
U i
0
2
2
1
0.1%
ROSEMOUNT
0
D
0
! D
0
7
1
I
0%
MLNNETRISTA
1
1)' r:
0
0
U
0%
SAINT PAUL
0
1, 'i
U
D
0
0:
I
1
0%
iln
SAVAGE
0
0 , '
0
0
0
1
1
°
0%
LAICLV[LLE
0
IiN
1
0
e:
"D
0
0
1
1
0%
. ' c
704
2822
Nature of MSP Complaints
,i, , Coin Iamt
P
Total
Ea, rly/Late
23
25
Engine Run-up
0
3
Excessive Noise
180164,
645
Frequency
29
400
Ground Noise
0
11
Helicopter
I
4
Low Flying
28
6.T�
Structural Disturbance
6
11;7 +
Other
0
4550
Note: Shaded Columns represent MSP complaints filed via the Internet.
Sum of %Total of Complaints may not equal 100% due to rounding;.
i `As of May 2005, the MSP Complaints by City report includes multiple
complaint descriptors per individual complaint. Therefore, the number of
complaint descriptors may be more than the number of reported complaints.
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Time of Day
Airport :'q .. -,. 'MiT tat
?:Tmaei,Total,
2822
0000-0559
25
pisi.36
0600-0659
21
0
0700-1159
645
Lake Elmo
1200-1.559
400
734 ;•;
1600-1959
405
337
2000-2159
143
2200-2259
146
120.:
2300-2359
23
�9
Complaints by Airport
Airport :'q .. -,. 'MiT tat
_.MSP
2822
Airlake
12
Anoka
47
Crystal
0
Flying Cloud
192
Lake Elmo
0
St. Paul
0
I\4isc.
0
iota] 30731
-1-
MSP International Airport
Aviation Noise Complaints for November 2008
W
"Pub LA. P'
Vi
'
AJ Carcoran'
L4
6
P,
'N , 01-, ly i��iadk NgUfOa�s
+
J
apF
a2v
"Ll
5 y 1-
j .,R
R".
j
V
V
VTic� -'" Tic�
klyn O,
Ink A —
dear
77. -
�AN -11b,
H t
Fc. -
T
,Lj
etal , — . !�C12L�i—lj ,,Y L
M
dina
p e n en
gg
?4y Q j3jn--,a le.
!g�
M
r
ti;iw
F a
S,
, p4i n
FUVER
')Q
A
g�_ IM 5f.
n n e4s t&-�,
45 atY- no
V
'I U1 r,
-NI L
fir
MS, A
MMO P 01
n H'
W
hl
S
h
d, 111,1 tq J9
j M
- i5
5�
0.6
A
VI R ),gtt��
M
ka,
M6 c
&M�
"0,
i55 xenij
V, T: 7131 2
J,
L
i i wass r ffid
DA
A,
Arh r
J we gt.
NO
ka --,MOM
...........
ix,
41
>
;1T
Shakop.,
—L rra vage
'Zo
iV
T . . . . . . al-
osernount
zo&
P. A
oai
J.
vi�
rf,
X/
41
A I F
J
RNA, Lakeville
4
Faimin t0h,
�c
A
Number of Complaints per Address
1-3 4-8 9-16 17-41
42-54
55-87
88-209
210-902
- 2 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Available Hours for Runway Use
November 2008
(z>ource: t -AA runway use Logs)
m All Hours
W
-b It
eapolis
hfield
'Aighttime Hours
Oa
A4 ti h"bapolis
int
Nil
ZIM.
..... .. .
015
�M,
Ji jj
Z
M
MR,
2, D,
difield.
on'll
F"
FAA Averaae Dailv Count
�"
2:: tNovember '2 N 0
Air Carrier
774
733
Commuter
407
396
General Aviation
46
38
Military
9
11
Note: Sum of daily average count may not equal total due to rounding.
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 3 -
All Operations
Runway Use Report November 2001
A.
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 1
0%
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 3560 20.5% 3052
16.4%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 3406 19.6% 3133
16.9%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 0
0%
22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 0 0% 0
0%
30L Arr Eaqan/Mendota Heights 3422 19.7% 4272
23%
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 4139 23.9% 5031
27.1% 1
35 Arr Bloom ington/Eagan 2815 16.2% 1 3066
16.5%
04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 3 0% 5
0%
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 2304 13.5% 1958
10.7%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1183 6.9% 768
4.2%
17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 4212 24.7% 4455
24.4%
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 13 0.1% 35
0.2%
30L Dep, So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4099 24% 5106
28%
30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 5241 30.7% 5911
32.4%
35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 6
0%
ta
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
4
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report November 2008
,1- Ir
N11` 5 Hg�v: N. Last Year rI y,
V—R
R', -.,12 -MiliN
_fg
A Years
RINYY T411 UP. i9i!,,�,.!
D V, PP 9 r. A rd
04 Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
0
0%
1
0%
12L Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
2888
20%
2505
16.3%
12R Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
2878
20%
2690
17.5%
17 Arr
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
0
0%
22 Arr
St. Paul/Highland Park
0
0%
0
0%
30L Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
2886
20%
3513
22.9%
30R Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
3448
23.9%
4187
27.2%
35 Arr
Bloomington/Eagan
2308
16%
2475
16.1%
Total_ Arrivals -
1.1
`4 ,
04 Dep
St. Paul/Highland Park
3
0%
4
0%
12L Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
1679
11.8%
1459
9.6%
12R Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
992
7%
662
4.4%
17 Dep
Bloomington/Eagan
3709
26%
3975
26.2%
22 Dep
So. Richfield/Bloomington
12
0.1%
20
0.1%
30L Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
3552
24.9%
4269
28.1%
30R Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
4316
30.3%
1 4794
31.6%
35 Dep
So. Minneapolis
0
0%
3
Total Deptures 14263 1518E
Totai Operationsc28671
30557
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 5 -
November 2008 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
FAR Pait 36 Take r !
Type Off NLl
ose eve, i4rcrafi bescrpt�on '' Sta e; t Gount, Percenfi
a. _ ..... J..
8742
110
Boeing 747-200
3
11
0%0
DC10
103
McDonnell Douglas DC10
3
174
0.6%
B744
101.6
Boeing 747-400
3
68
0.2%
DC8Q
100.5
McDonnell Douglas DC8 Re -manufactured
3
75
0.3%
L101
99.3
Lockheed L-1011
3
2
0%
MD11
95.8
McDonnell Douglas MD11
3
34
0.1%
B767
95.7
Boeing 767
3
38
0.1%
A330
95.6
Airbus Industries A330
3
239
0.8%
B72Q
94.5
Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3
3
33
0.1%
A300
94
Airbus Industries A300
3
91
0.3%
A310
92.9
Airbus Industries A310
3
34
0.1%
MD80
91.5
McDonnell Douglas MD80
3
911
3.2%
8757
91.4
Boeing 757
3
2363
8.2%
DC9Q
91
McDonnell Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3
3
2638
9.2%
A321
89.8
Airbus Industries A321
3
1
0%
8734
88.9
Boeing 737-400
3
25
0.1%
B739
88.4
Boeing 737-900
3
45
0.2%
A320
87.8
Airbus Industries A320
3
3656
12.8%
8735
87.7
Boeing 737-500
3
365
1.3%
8738
87.7
Boeing 737-800
3 1
1081
3.8%
B7377
87.5
Boeing 737-700
3
318
1.1%
A318
87.5
Airbus Industries A318
3
15
0.1%
B733
87.5
Boeing 737-300
3
431
1.5%
A319
87.5
Airbus Industries A319
3
3990
13.9%
E190
83.7
Embraer 190
3
101
0.4%
E170
83.7
Embraer 170
3
2438
8.5%
E145
83.7
Embraer 145
3
588
2.1%
B717
83
Boeing 717
3
24
0.1%
CRJ
82.7
Canadair Regional Jet
3
8542
29.8%
E135
77.9
Embraer 135 1
3
335
1.2%
J328 76.5 Fairchild Dornier 328 3
_.
5 0%
2861,,
rvo aum of neat mix i may not equal 7uU % clue to rounding.
k ufrent
'Last Years
C°
Ci P: 2
t a it
PercentkN.
Stage II 0 0%
0%
Stage 111 2671 9.3%
13.4%
Stage III Manufactured 26000 90.7%
86.6%
r
Note: Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet all stage III criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation
(FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS
DC8Q are re -engined with manufactured stage 3 engines and are classified as Stage III Manufactured as of
January 1, 2008.
-The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during
take -off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). l\
•EPNL is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone -corrected perceived noise level
of an aircraft flyover measured in A -weighted decibels.
- 6 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Runway Use Report November 2008
l..- H
Year
....... . ..... ..... .... N N 6&4
r 'pe IV.* Ord n ig�,,::Percent
04 Arr
So. Richfield/Bloomington
0 0%
1
0.1%
12L Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
184 16.3%
132
11.5%
12R Arr
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
263 23.3%
30
26.4%
17 Arr
So. Minneapolis
0 0%
0
0%
22 Arr
St. Paul/Highland Park
0 0%
0
0%
30L Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
474 41.9%
405
35.3%
30R Arr
Eagan/Mendota Heights
204 18.1%
251
21.9%
35 Arr
Bloomington/Eagan
5 0.4%
54
4.7%
M. -
.nrN
HK
04 Dep
St. Paul/Highland Park
0 0%
0
0%
12L Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
227 32%
188
25.4%
12R Dep
Eagan/Mendota Heights
120 16.9%
87
11.8%
17 Dep
Bloomington/Eagan
65 9.2%
83
11.2%
22 Dep
So. Richfield/Bloomington
1 0.1%
0
0%
30L Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
80 11.3%
133
18%
30R Dep
So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield
216 30.50/6
247
33.4%
35 Dep
I So. Minneapolis
0 0%
1
0.1%
Tota(`Dearfuces 7Q9 739
Ni0.i
-T
9 1885
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
-7-
Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Runway Use Report November 2008
a s 1(ear 0;
0- I -H . ..... .. ......... ... .. ....
IT A.H...
0V vUIARIII�.l ii 1 11. - I!ilii !'Il --i,Count B
'15 �g,
Fl",�*,�l*&il.",�.",��.i�..�'�"F-,.,6;,�,.,.,i�,
U.NOP. V, Till -L
x
Iffir
departure,'
pper, i
r...
phsl Pp P,
ip,"i"..-
e. n
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0
0%
1
0.1%
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 166
16.4%
118
11.3%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 239
278
.23.6%
26.6%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0
0%
0
0%
22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park b
0%
0
0%
30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 414
40.9%
372
35.5%-
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 193
19.1%
228
21.8%
35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 1
0.1%
50
4.8%
as pri Nq, -T
4, S. HNIMN.1,; '.,Ii,.",p1..: i 5i
MINIIIiiI,a R flk, 'r,
�6
Ht'i . ......
04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 0
U& W, R
0%
11, U
0
0%,
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 189
32.9%
166
25.3%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 88
15.3%
70
10.7%
17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 58
10.1%
83
12.6%
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 0
.0%
0
0%
30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 53
9.2%
120
18.3%
30R. Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield- 186
32.4%
218
33.2%
35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0
0%
0
0%
A Total Departures 574
!.E
G
btal Operations " 1587 704
Note: Sum of HUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
-8- Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
350
300
En
= 250
to
200
Q
150
100
50
a
December 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
<> Lry <> U-) <> to <> W� <> W") <> tn <> W) <> to �� tr� <> U") <> to <> tn C> Ti> U--�
In I�t IR "�i �12 -,:� IR ii 1�2 "�� IR Ili In -;�� IR 11� In -�� IR Ili In -�t IR Ti U *�� Ti 1�2 ��
cli cli crJ cr) Cn co <> C> <> C> —1 —4 —4 —1 " " CIj " CI) CI) Cv-, C-') � It- -,a- cv to Ln LO to
C11 cli cli cli " " <> C> <> C> C> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> C> <> C> <> <> <>
TIme
December 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
. ... .. . . .... .
MIT . . ... . ..
"ITil anufacturI!!-.'I!TPE
2— StadeTotal
Northwest (NWA)
0
56
337
393
FedEx (FDX)
0
0
102
102
Continental (COA)
0
0
77
77
Sun Country (SCX)
0
0
69
69
Midwest Airlines (MEP)
0
0
50
50
BAX (78W)
0
46
0
46
Delta (DAL)
0
0
45
45
Kitty Hawk (KHA)
0
8
36
44
US Airways (USA)
0
0
42
42
American (AAL)
0
0
37
37
Frontier Airlines (FFT)
0
0
31
31
United (UAL)
0
0
28
28
Airtran (TRS)
0
0
3
3
Total i,v 104 N
`fii
011-A
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 9 -
December 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations
Flrght Days of
Time 04KNumber. Equ�pmenti Stage Operation Routing $r
1�1 n.iN F.
22:30 A BAX 705 B72Q H MTWThF YYC MSP TOL
22:30
D
Northwest
1751
DC9Q
H
MTWThFSu
MSP GRB
22:30
D
Northwest
3445
CRJ
M
MTWThFSu
LSE
22:31
A—
Northwest
519
B757
M
WThFSu
--MSP
LGA MSP
22:35
A
Airtran
869
B737
M
MTW
ATL MSP
22:35
D
FedEx
1021
A300
M
MTWTh
22:35
D
FedEx
2021
A300
M
MW
22:35
D
Northwest
2895
CRJ
M
MTWThFSu
MSP DSM
22:35
D
Northwest
3286
CRJ
M
MTWThFSu
MSP ATW
22:35
D
Northwest
562
A320
M
MTWThFSu
DEN MSP MKE
22:37
A
United
726
8733
M
M
DEN MSP
22:38
A
Delta
6937
CRJ
M
MTWThFSSu
JFK MSP
22:40
D
Northwest
145
DC9Q
H
MTWThFSu
ORD MSP DLH
22:42
A
Continental
2877
E145
M
MTWThFSu
EWR MSP
22:43
A
Frontier Airlines
109
A319
M
MTWThFSSu
DEN MSP
22:45
D
Northwest
1715
A319
M
MT
DCA MSP FSD
22:45
D
Northwest
1715
A319
M
WThFSu
MSP FSD
22:55
A
Sun Country
704
B738
M
MTWThFS
PHX MSP
22:56
A
Northwest
310
A319
M
MT
LAX MSP
23:07
A
Delta
1522
8738
M
MTThFSSu
ATL MSP
23:07
A
Delta
1522
B757
M
W
ATL MSP
23:10
D
FedEx
2266
A310
M
W
23:12
A
United
463
B733
M
MTWThF
ORD MSP
23:17
A
United
463
B733
M
Su
ORD MSP
23:20
A
American
1673
MD80
M
MTWThFSu
DCA ORD MSP
23:20
A
Sun Country
106
B738
M
MTThF
LAS MSP
23:25
A
Midwest Airlines
2210
E170
M
MTWThFSu
BOS MKE MSP
23:27
A
Northwest
2007
E175
M
MTWThFSu
DTW MSP
23:30
D
BAX -705
B72Q
H
MTWThF
YYC MSP TOL
23:35
A
Sun Country
384
B738
M
MT
RSW MSP
23:42
A
US Airways
940
A320
M
MT
SAN PHX MSP
23:44
A
US Airways
940
A320
M
WThFSu
SAN PHX MSP
23:47
A
US Airways
1074
A319
M
MT
CLT MSP
23:50
A
US Airways
1074
A319
M
WThFSSu
CLT MSP
23:54
A
Continental
2816
E145
M
MTWThFSu
IAH MSP
23:55
A
American
�049
B-738
M
MTWThFSSu
MIA MSP
23.55
A
Sun Country
404
B738
M
MTWThFSu
SAN MSP
00:15
A
Kitty Hawk
772
B733
M
TWThF
DEN MCI MSP FWA
00:30
A
Kitty Hawk
1850
B72Q
H
S
PDX SEA MSP FWA
00:30
A
Sun Country
416
8738
M
TS
PSP MSP
00:45
D
Kitty Hawk
772
B733
M
TWThF
DEN MCI MSP FWA
01:15
D
Kitty Hawk
1850
B72Q
H
S
PDX SEA MSP FWA
03:15
D
FedEx
1156
A310
M
TWThFS
03:30
D
FedEx
1407
MD11
M
MTWThFS
03:30
D,
FedEx
2718
MD11
M
W
04:00
D
FedEx
1718
MD11
M
MTWThF
04:00
D
FedEx
27-18
MD11
—M
S
04:40
D
FedEx
2718
MD11
M
S
04:45
D—
FedEx
1744
A310
M
MTWThFS
05:15
D
FedEx
3822
MD11
M
TWThF
- 10 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
December 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Carrier Jet Operations
Flight Y'I gl"YR�0.',!i -H'Days of
'.
5
Time AID &I NO' HI!Equipment` {Stagy Operation'
IV
Routing r
05:25
D
Delta
1073
B738
M
TWFSSu
MSP ATL
05:25
D
Delta
1073
B757
M
Th
MSP ATL
05:25
D
Delta
599
B738
M
M
MSP ATL SDQ
05:34
D
FedEx
2157
A300
M
F
05:45
D
Continental
2017
E145
M
MTWThF
MSP IAH
05:47
A
Northwest
154
8753
M
MTVVThFS
SEA MSP
05:47
A
Northwest
154
B757
M
SU
SEA MSP
05:49
A
Northwest
624
A333
M
MThFSSu
HNL MSP
05:49
A
Northwest
808
A333
M
MTW
HNL MSP
05:53
A
Northwest
314
A319
M
SU
LAX MSP
05:53
A
Northwest
314
A320
M
MTVVThFS
LAX MSP
05:53
A
Northwest
3467
CRJ
M
MT
BIS MSP MCI
05:53
A
Northwest
774
B757
M
MTFS
LAS MSP
05:55
A
Northwest
744
DC9Q
H
MT
GFK MSP DTW
05:55
D
FedEx
2405
A300
M
W
05:55
D
Midwest Airlines
2420
E170
M
TWThFS
MSP MKE
05:55
D
Midwest Airlines
2810
CRJ
M
M
MSP MKE CMH
05:56
A
Northwest
362
A320
M
MTThFS
SFO MSP
05:56
A
Northwest
362
B757
M
SU
SFO MSP
05:57
A
Northwest
3277
CRJ
M
MTW hFS
RST MSP OMA
05:57
A
Northwest
3463
CRJ
M
MTWThFS
LSE MSP IAH
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 11 -
November 2008 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Total Nighttime Jet
Operations by Hour
e o
,;TYpex. Gount;.
American
AAL
3
B738
27
American
AAL
00
MD80
00
America West
,00
3
00
�
T
,;TYpex. Gount;.
American
AAL
3
B738
27
American
AAL
3
MD80
28
America West
AWE
3
A319
28
America West
AWE
3
A320
26
America West
AWE
3
E190
4
Continental Exp.
BTA
3
E145
54
Compass
CPZ
3
E170
96
Delta
DAL
3
B738
54
Delta
DAL
3
MD80
1
DHL
DHL
3
DC8Q
37
FedEx
FDX
3
A300
12
FedEx
FDX
3
A310
15
FedEx
FDX
3
DC10
36
Frontier Airlines
FFT
3
A319
22
Pinnacle
FLG
3
CRJ
99
Mesaba
MES
3
CRJ
254
Northwest
NWA
3
A319
94
Northwest
NWA
3
A320
136
Northwest
NWA
3
A330
27
Northwest
NWA
3
B742
1
Northwest
NWA
3
8744
1
Northwest
NWA
3
B757
69
Northwest
NWA
3
DC9Q
128
Sun Country
SCX
3
B738
138
Skywest Airlines
SKW
3
CRJ
24
United
UAL
3
8733
9-2—
2United
United
UAL
3
B735
3
UPS
UPS
3
A300
15
UPS
UPS
3
B742
1
UPS
UPS
3
B757
15
UPS
UPS
3
13767
6
UPS
UPS
3
DC8Q
18
UPS
UPS
3
MD11
8
Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 94.5% of the total nighttime carrier jet operations.
- 12 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
November 2008 Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
300
250
200
ra
CL
0
150
loo
50
0 to O to o to <> LO C> L - o to <> to <> to <> to C> W) <> to <> to
'�t O T!
-a 71 'n 'ct
cli cli co M cr) c) <> <> <> <> 1-4 1-4 1-4 cli Cj Cj cj M M M c) zr W7 W� W1
" cli " C11 cli " <> Ic> <> <> <> <> c� <> C> <> <> �� :> <> <> 'c> <> <> <> <>
November 2008 Nighttime Carrier Jet Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines
U:su p.m. to 0-.Uu a.rn.
manutacturea fi.!Uil
Stage ia Stage T 9,P
Airline !;im::gttg1:ge
Northwest (NWA)
0
128
328
456
Mesaba (MES)
0
0
254
254
Sun Country (SCX)
0
0
138
138
Pinnacle (FLG)
0
0
99
99
Compass (CPZ)
0
0
96
96 _
FedEx (FDX)
0
0
63
63 _
UPS (UPS)
0
0
63
63 —
America West (AWE)
0
0
58
58
American (AAL)
0
0
55
55 —
Delta (DAL)
0
0
55
55 —
Continental Exp. (BTA)
0
0
54
54
DHL (DHL)
0
0
37
37
United (UAL)
0
0
25
25
Skywest Airlines (SKW)
0
0
24
24
Frontier Airlines (FFT)
0
0
22
22
Other
0
23
65
88
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
-13-
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — November 2008
Nov 1 thru 8, 2008 — 3829 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Nov 1 thru 8, 2008 — 3767 Carrier Jet Departures
Nov 1 thru 8, 2008 — 272 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Nov 1 thru 8, 2008 —135 Nighttime Carder Jet Departures
- 14 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — November 2008
Nov 9 thru 16, 2008 — 3921 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Nov 9 thru 16, 2008 — 3891 Carrier Jet Departures
Nov 9 thru 16, 2008 — 270 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Nov 9 thru 16, 2008 —172 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
-15-
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — November 2008
Nov 17 thru 24, 2008 — 3981 Carder Jet Arrivals
Nov 17 thru 24, 2008 — 3949 Carder Jet Departures
Nov 17 thru 24, 2008 — 284 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Nov 17 thru 24, 2008 —161 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
-16- Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Nov 25 thru 30, 2008 — 2677 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Nov 25 thru 30, 2008 — 2656 Carrier Jet Departures
Nov 25 thru 30, 2008 —187 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Nov 25 thru 30, 2008 —106 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 -17-
MSP International AiMort
Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site Locations
Remote Monitoring Tower
-18- Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events
November 2008
N;N Nil
31M V`
RMT L t Time > Tame, , , Time Time >
ID,ga R Address Um 65d 8 13: B
2.
KIM No' q 01, .. . ..... .. 'r
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
17:39:50
00:01:29
00:00:00
00:00:00
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
16:45:29
00:13:13
00:00:00
00:00:00
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
17:57:41
00:36:41
00:00:15
00:00:00
4-
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
16:38:59
00:17:46
00:00:07
00:00:00
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
19:07:43
03:25:45
00:00:56
00:00:00
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
19:38:41
03:06:48
00:03:42
00:00:02
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
00:18:29
00:00:06
00:00:00
00:00:00
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
00:10:58
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
00:00:39
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
00:00:34
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
00:00:44
00:00:02
00:00:00
00:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
00:00:35
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
00:09:32
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
14
Eagan
1 st St. & McKee St.
22:55:26
00:00:52
00:00:00
00:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
00:31:35
00:00:04
00:00:00
00:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
18:52:46
00:53:54
00:00:43
00:00:07
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
00:00:16
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
00-31:08
00:00:12
00:00:00
00:00:00
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
00:11:35
00:00:08
00:00:00
00:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
00:00:47
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
00:04:32
00:00:03
00:00:00
00:00-.00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
13:16:42
00:00:17
00:00:00
00:00:00
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kerindon Ave.
02:11:24
00:00:19
00:00:00
00:00:00
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
23:04:36
00:01:50
00:00:00
00:00:00
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
00:35:17
00:00:07
00:00:00
00:00:00
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
00:58:13
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
00:11:17
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
01:24:23
00:00:41
00:00:00
00:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
00:00:56
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
04:52:30
00:00:33
00:00:00
00:00:00
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
00:00:30
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
00:00:10
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
00:01:47
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
08:21:31
00:00:14
00:00:00
00:00:00
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
13:12:45
00:00:25
00:00:00
00:00:00
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
00:00:10
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
00:00:31
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
39
3477 St. Charles Pl.
00:01:12
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:00
_Eagan
Total17jme for Arrwal Nose en. s
219 1 '6
4.
4
00,
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 19 -
Time Above Threshold dB for Departure Related Noise Events
November 2008
Time
1 E
go
Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 04:00:20 00:02:19 00:00:00 00:00:00
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
04:36:37
00:02:23
00:00:00
00:00:00
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
09:51:03
00:07:17
00:00:48
00:00:00
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
11:45:37
00:12:26
00:00:15
00:00:00
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
38:20:02
02:28:58
00:16:04
00.00:00
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
46:41:41
05:25:19
00:46:46
00:00:08
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
20:32:40
00:36:42
00:00:16
00:00:00
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
12:30:12
00:16:59
00:00:02
00:00:-00
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
00:06:10
00:00:09
00:00:00
00:00:00
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
00:07:09
00:00:46
00:00:21
00:00:00
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
00:08:56
00:00:48
00:00:15
00:00:00
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
00:04:07
00:00:00
00:00:00
00:00:0-0
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
06:00:14
00:01:14
00:00:00
00:00:00
14
Eagan
I st St. & McKee St.
07:01:31
00:16:40
00:00:22
00:00:00
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
09:38:25
00:04:35
00:00:00
00:00:00
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
06:57:18
00:28:22
00:6-1:08
00:00:05
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
00:24:33
00:02:23
00:00:27
00:00:00
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
13:19:27
00:21:01
00:01:28
00:00:04
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
07:51:22
00.02:44
00:00:06
00:00:00
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
00:51:41
00:00:50
00:00:00
00:00:00
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
02:13:56
00:01:02
00:00:00
00:00:00
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
01:38:46
00:00:03
00:00:00
00:00:00
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
14:37:51
00:36:16
00:02:34
00:00:00
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
04:17:53
00:04:06
00:00:00
00:00:00
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
05:48:41
00:00:14
00:00:00
00:00:00
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
03:33:55
00:01:47
00:00:00
00:00:00
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
08:31:07
00:08:18
00:00:00
00:00:0-0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
25:24:24
00:18:33
00:00:14
00:00:00
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S.
07:58:52
00:04:45
00:00:00
00:00:00
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
19:34:52
01:07:27
00:03:00
00:00:00
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
01:56:56
00:01:17
00:00:04
00:00:00
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
00:48:42
00:00:13
00:00:00
00:00:00
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
01:35:35
00:00:28
00:00:00
00.00:00
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
00:31:45
00:00:01
00:00:00
00:00:00
35.
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
03:01:26
00:02:36
00:00:00
00:00:00
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond*
01:05:37
00:00:10
00:00:00
00:00:00
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
02:03:52
00:01:12
00:00:00
00:00:00-
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
03:56:26
00:02:27
00:00:00
00:00:00
,-39-1—
Eagan
3477 St. Charles Pl.
05:48:39
00:04:40
00:00:00
00:00:00
............ ... ....... ...
qisfig I
q! Y
- 20 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Arrival Related Noise Events
November 2008
.' !AN
iM
zl.....A..,. ...O..... t
RMT Events
..........................
if
tg N Address4.
ilHir"l , -'HE90d6 100dB
1
Minneapolis
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.
4170
22
0
0
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
3416
208
0
0
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
3471
514
3
0
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
3554
293
1
0
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
3637
2498
213
0
6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
3717
2838
129
1
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
76
3
0
0
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
34
0
0
0
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
2
0
0
0
10
St. Paul
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St.
2
0
0
0
11
St. Paul
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave.
3
1
0
0
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
2
0
0
0
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
26
0
0
0
14
Eagan
1st St. & McKee St.
5326
13
0
0
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
119
1
0
0
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
3594
660
6
0
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
2
0
0
0
18
Richfield
75th St. & 17th Ave.
151
2
0
0
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
47
6
0
0
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
3
0
0
0
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
19
1
0
0
22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
3066
6
0
0
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
571
5
0
0
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
5147
35
0
0
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
129
4
0
0
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
268
0
0
0
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
42
0
0
0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
270
12
0
0
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S.
4
0
0
0
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
1405
8
0
0
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
2
0
0
0
32
Bloomington
10326 Pleasant Ave. S.
0
0
0
0
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
1
0
0
0
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
11
0
0
0
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
2110
6
0
0
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
2485
4
0
0
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln. N.
1
0
0
0
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
3
0
0
0
39
Eagan
3477 St. Charles PI. 1
8 1
0
0 1
0
............
71!40 162' 4
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 21 -
Departure Related Noise Events
November 2008
wu
2
Minneapolis
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
949
33
0
0
3
Minneapolis
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
1816
77
9
0
4
Minneapolis
Park Ave. & 48th St.
2114
127
5
0
5
Minneapolis
12th Ave. & 58th St.
5873
927
179
0
—6
Minneapolis
25th Ave. & 57th St.
7435
2307
378
5
7
Richfield
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.
3227
315
4
0
8
Minneapolis
Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
2059
151
1
0
9
St. Paul
Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave.
22
1
0
0
12
St. Paul
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
13
0
0
0
13
Mendota Heights
Southeast end of Mohican Court
1214
21
0
0
15
Mendota Heights
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave.
1730
5-8
0
0
16
Eagan
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
1072
163
14
0
17
Bloomington
84th St. & 4th Ave.
75
11
4
0
18
Richfield
75t�—St. & 17th Ave.
2577
231
11
2
19
Bloomington
16th Ave. & 84th St.
1505
39
0
20
Richfield
75th St. & 3rd Ave.
172
9
-2
0
0
21
Inver Grove Heights
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
494
14
0
0
.22
Inver Grove Heights
Anne Marie Trail
294
2
0
0
23
Mendota Heights
End of Kenndon Ave.
2303
305
37
0
24
Eagan
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
747
54
0
0
25
Eagan
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd.
733
4
0
0
26
Inver Grove Heights
6796 Arkansas Ave. W.
722
17
0
0
27
Minneapolis
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S.
1680
106
0
0
28
Richfield
6645 16th Ave. S.
4143
229
6
0
29
Minneapolis
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 3 -1st Ave. S.
1395
43
0
0
30
Bloomington
8715 River Ridge Rd.
3024
431
40
0
31
Bloomington
9501 12th Ave. S.
396
11
1
0
32
Bloomington
10325 Pleasant Ave. S.
163
2
0
0
33
Burnsville
North River Hills Park
321
6
0
0
34
Burnsville
Red Oak Park
106
1
0
0
35
Eagan
2100 Garnet Ln.
538
28
0
0
36
Apple Valley
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond
198
3
0
0
37
Eagan
4399 Woodgate Ln—.N.
352
17
0
0
38
Eagan
3957 Turquoise Cir.
670
38
0
0
39
Eaga n
3477 St. Charles Pl.
1074
68
0
0
T.
-22Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#1)
Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St.. Minneapolis
Number . . ..... .. ft
3
H DepartureTl-ill IR P21 MEN. H
........ . ....
11/05/200810:44
NWA20
B744
A
12R
85.7
11/05/200810:48
AAL851
MD80
A
12R
84.8
11123/200813:14
NWA19
8744
D
30L
84.7
11/11/200816:50
NWA780
B757
A
12R
84.6
11/13/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
22
84.2
11/30/2008 13:18
NWA19
B744
D
30L
84
11/24/200813:11
NWA19
B744
D
30L
83.8
11/11/2008 7:58
NWA783
B757
A
12R
83.7
11/08/200814:33
NWA3
B744
D
30L
83.6
11/27/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
22
83.3
(RMT Site#2)
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis
, IT-` d B
t e
;YH5
'U' l!Iii
.0 PI: l;l EU
PO Olil Tii f T "t
11/26/200813:12
NWA19
B744
D
30L
88.6
11/061200810:00
NWA921
B757
A
12L
88
11/01/200814:37
SCX572
B738
A
12R
87.8
11/16/200813:22
NWA19
B744
D
30L
87.6
11/06/2008 5:51
CC1706
B72Q
A
12L
86.6
11/05/200815:39
NWA1261
DC9Q
A
12L
86.3
11/11/200819:06
NWA796
DC9Q
A
12L
86.1
11/06/2008 9:21
NWA1260
DC9Q
A
12L
86
11/05/200817:51
NWA1496
DC9Q
A
.12L
85.6
11/05/2008 20:43
NWA499
DC9Q
A
12L
85.3
(RMT Site#3)
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minneapolis
Date/Time' Flight Numberg'l' ,un a
it P i U P"r".2l"N "A -UN!"M
11/11/2008 8:00
NWA783
8757
A
12R
98.5
11/11/200816:51
NWA780
8757
A
12R
94.7
11/26/200813:12
NWA19
B744
D
30L
93.4
11/23/200813:13
NWA19
B744
D
30L
93.3
11/08/200814:32
NWA3
B744
D
30L
92.7
11/19/200813:20
NWA19
B744
D
30L
92.2
11/16/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
30L
92.2
11/07/200817:42
NWA746
DC9Q
D
30L
92.2
11/24/200813:10
NWA19
8744
D
30L
91.7
11/30/200813:18
NWA19
B744
D
30L
91.6
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 23 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#4)
Park Ave. & 48th St. Minneapolis
Date/Time Flight NumberAircraft Type `; ! +
H A
H
URN
1"D N'�
11/13/200810:32
NWA454
Wk
Ogg iH
11/06/200810:00
NWA221
B757
A
12L
96
11/02/200817:19
NWA746
DC9Q
D
30L
92.2
11/30/200817:36
NWA746
DC9Q
D
30L
91.3
11/02/200819:05
NWA1535
DC9Q
D
30R
90.2
11/26/200814:32
AAL354
MD80
D
30R
90.2
11/09/200815:14
NWA19D
8744
D
30L
90
11/14/2008 8:57
NWA752
DC9Q
D
30L
88.7
11/10/200815:53
NWAl 9D
B744
D
30L
88.1
11/10/2008 20:33
NWA796
DC9Q
D
30R
88
L 11/20/200813:19
NWA19
B744
D
30L
87.2
(RMT Site#5)
12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis
a Oeatjffimoel'--ig�ulz
H
NU
NVI n 2M Nll'n
C i,
"a: n
11/13/200810:32
NWA454
Wk
11/06/200810:01
DC9Q
D
30L
98.7'
11/30/200813:17
NWAII 9
B744
D
30L
98.4
11/07/200817:57
NWA136
DC9Q
D
30L
97.9
11/16/200810:36
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
97.8
11/16/200811:51
NWA452
DC9Q
D
.30L
97.3
11/28/200816:50
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
97.1
11/02/200816:57
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
97
11/29/200816:53
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
96.8
11/15/2008 6:48
NWA448
DC9Q
D
30L
96.7
11/09/200811:58
NWA452
DC9Q
D
30L
96.7
(F<MT Site#6)
25th Ave. & 57th St. Minneannfis
- 24 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Wk
11/06/200810:01
NWA221
8757
A
12L
103
11/02/200819:04
NWA1535
DC9Q
D
30R.
101.3
11/02/200819:36
NWA924
DC9Q
D
30R
100.9
11/16/200817:59
NWA746
DC9Q
D
30R
100.6
11/09/200819:40
NWA1496
DC9Q
D
30R
100.5
11/13/200811:33
NWA750
DC9Q
D
30R
100
11/02/200814:34.
NWA1529
DC9Q
D
30R
100
11/09/200818:13
NWA746
DC9Q
D
30R
99.9
11/07/200819:31
NWA1056
DC9Q
D
30R
99.9
11/13/200814:29
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
30R
99.8
- 24 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#7)
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St.. Richfield
M
Date/TimeU. T 6V 0
t Fhghf, UMU vlfflRi Jd
rK r... N
. '
M0 V=PaUy 3
Hil
11/14/200816:56
NWA458
DC9Q
D
30L
92.1
11/14/200810:33
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
91.5
11/30/200811:16
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
.90.7
11/28/200813:15
AAL1074
MD80
D
30L
90.1
11/08/200814:20
DAU 563
MD80
D
30L
89.7
11/10/2008 8:55
AAL2427
MD80
D
30L
89.5
11/06/200812:11
NWA452
DC9Q
D
30L
89.4
11/14/200814:31
DAU 563
MD80
D
30L
89.4
11/08/2008 6:58
DA -11747
MD80
D
30L
89.1
11/14/200816:23
DAU 655
MD80
D
30L
88.8
(RMT Site#8)
I-onafellow Ave. & 43rd St.. Minneapolis
WP,11'v" -F
lit RrItK.
04! ,
11/26/2008 8:10
AAL718
MD80
D
30R
90.3
11/18/2008 7:16
NWA744
DC9Q
D
30R
88.2
11/28/200814:30
AAL354
MD80
D
30R
88.2
11/30/200813:43
AAL718
MD80
D
30R
88.1
11/02/200817:14
NWA758
DC9Q
D
30R
88
11/13/200811:39
AALI 120
MD80
D
30R
87.7
11/15/2008 8:11
AAL718
MD80
D
30R
87.2
11/30/200815:03
NWA865
DC9Q
D
30R
86.8
11/19/200816:02
AAL408
MD80
D
30R
86.
11/18/2008 8:07
AAL718
MD80
D
30R
86.3
(Km i 61tegu)
Saratoaa St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul
T ..Q.... ..V...
a L
oil
DateR�me x"Flight Number /aircraft R 0
L N wM
'a N jj E.P
11/01/200815:14
NWA19
8744
D
04
82.4
11/11/2008 6:43
BMJ72
BE80
D
12L
77,2
11/07/200813:55
NWA19
B744
D
04
76.2
11/01/2008 7:39
BMJ52
BE80
D
12L
73.8
11/06/200812:31
SCX242
8738
A
30L
73.2
11/12/2008 6:37
BMJ62
BE80
D
12L
72.4
11/29/2008 7:12
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
72.3
11/15/2008 6:19
NWA890 I
A320
D
30L
72.2
11/19/200819:07
NWA590
A320
D
30R
72.2
11/06/2008 6:13
BMJ54
BE80
D
12R
72
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 25 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#1 0)
Itasca Ave- & Rnwrinin Rt Rt Paid
WN
-i,- Hii
W
Ori Mil M
4 nn a r M
11/01/200815.14 NWA19 B744 D 04 97.
11/07/200813:54
NWA19
8744
D
04
94.5
11/08/200813:33
NWA19
B744
D
04
93.6
11/01/2008 7:36
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
79.3
11/04/200816:53
TCA1
UKN
D
12R
75.5
11/29/2008 7:25
BMJ68
BE99
D
12L
75.3
11/25/2008 7:29
BMJ48
BE80
D
30R
73.4
11/07/2008 6:24
BMJ70
BE80
D
12L
73.2
11/08/2008 7:36
BMJ58
BE99
D
30R
72.9
11/11/2008 6:50
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
72.7
(RMT Site#1 1)
Finn St.& Srhpfft-r Ax/tz Rt Pqi it
......... . .
UM
at ---ig pYp Ali-
, 'Departure E;5
11W
11/08/200813.33
NWA19
B744
D
04
95.2 1
11/07/200813:54
NWA19
B744
D
04
94
11/01/200815:14
NWA19
B744
D
04
84.3
11/06/200812:31
SCX242
B738
A
30L
81.6
11/19/200819:06
NWA590
A320
D
30R
75.7
11/25/2008 7:30
BMJ48
BE80
D
30R
74.9
11/26/2008 6:39
BMJ48
BE80
D
30L
73.5
11/17/2008 22:50
NWA120
A320
D
30R
73
11/24/2008 23:05
NWA562
A320
D
30R
72.6
11/0112008 7:36
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
72.4
Alton St- & Rnr.kwnnri Ax/P Rt Pni it
Y!N'1111:!, NO.-T."i, -A �rcraft!.T
M.1
H•P,
�11-111 IN ult-
- POMIIIEI`111-1.
PP
11/26/200810:16
NWA187
A319
A
30R
76.1
11/11/2008 6:43
BMJ72
BE80
D
12L
74.7
11/20/2008 3:35
USC432
BE58
D
30L
74.3
11/12/2008 6:36
BMJ62
BE80
D
12L
72.2
11/05/200811:15
MES2753
SF34
D
12L
72
11/11/2008 7:01
BMJ75
BE65
D
12L
71.9
11/11/2008 6:50
BMJ66
BE80
D
12L
71.4
11/29/2008 7:21
BMJ72
BE99
D
12L
71.3
1 11/08/200816:31
NWA1 708
A319
D
30R
71.1
1 11/05/2008 3:59
UPS556
A300
A
12L
71
- 26 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#1 3)
Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights
.............
41i fi rr max(d6) Rurniiray
1115 TY,
T I TH
11/1912008 0:02
CC11705
B72Q
D
12L
84.7
11/04/2008 21:22
NWA1 148
DC9Q
D
12L
84.1
11/13/2008 6:11
AAL1462
MD80
D
12L
82.9
11/22/2008 22:30
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
82.4
11/01/200814:53
NWA865
DC9Q
D
12L
82.2
11/29/2008 8:10
AAL718
MD80
D
12L
81.8
11/12/200814:39
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
81.4
11/03/200814:26
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
81.3
11/28/2008 22:25
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
81.2
11/01/200814:23
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
81.1
(RMT Site#14)
1st St. & McKee St., Eagan
M
D UM
Number aircraft T HERunway
gl� 'UR H,
Departure NW
M Pt
11/14/20081:02
CC13711
B72Q
D
12R
92.8
11/25/200813:27
NWA19
B744
D
12R
92.7
11/02/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
12R
91.5
11/22/200813:41
NWA19
B744
D
12R
90.9
11/07/2008 9:12
NWA1467
DC9Q
D
12R
90.7
11/29/200811:43
NWA1257
B757
D
12L
90.7
11/05/200810:37
NWA454
DC9Q
D
12R
90.2
11/18/200813:20
NWA19
8744
D
12R
89.2
11/22/200814:08
NWA3
B744
D
12R
89
11/12/200813:17
NWA19
B744
D
12R
88.9
(RMT Site#1 5)
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave., Mendota Heights
ITiM, arrival/
in
. I :., z K. t 1! �: �' '" �U 4 i*�tn 4"m
H, 1: U: Departure'',
;rfgP. M �- H
11/06/2008 15:54
NWA1 39
DC9Q
D
12L
87.9
11/13/2008 6:11
AAL1462
MD80
D
12L
87.7
11/03/200811:31
CPZ1 998
E170
D
12L
85.9
11/18/2008 21:31
NWA1 148
DC9Q
D
12L
85.6
11/02/200811:37
CPZ2073
E170
D
12L
85.5
11/23/2008 8:08
AAL718
MD80
D
12L
84.1
11/19/2008 0:02
CC11705
B72Q
D
12L
83.9
11/29/200814:58
NWA865
DC9Q
D
12L
83.6
11/05/2008 6:33
BMJ48
BE80
D
12L
83.3
11/04/200815:59
NWA865
DC9Q
D
12L
83.3
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 27 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#1 6)
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane, Eagan
ME 1w UM berY AircraftIFTI a f
MMM'1-y mgio -aw
g-
OMP
E I "I H 11" i "!'� -
41.n 2.1: 1*1 HDe l HE
11/26/2008 9:40
NWA221
B757
A
30L
96
11/29/2008 7:21
NWA736
DC9Q
D
12R
95.5
11/10/200819:55
NWA755
B757
A
30L
94.9
11/07/2008 9:12
NWA1467
DC9Q
D
12R
94.7
11/27/200817:09
NWA802
8757
A
30L
94
11/25/200817:19
NWA1 70
8757
A
30L
93.9
11/02/2008 17:24
NWA122
B757
A
30L
93.2
11/25/200813:27
NWA19
8744
D
12R
92.9
11/02/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
12R
92.9
11/01/200815:28
NWA3
8744
D
12R
92.5
(RMT Site#1 7)
84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington
'4� ;01��
Oil 19
0" WIT
le.; INRunway �max(dB U�
BMI.*111'.*ggl OR!! pli
. ... ...... . e a rture ,
11/14/200813:32 NWA19 B744 D 22 95.5
11/15/200813:27
NWA19
B744
D
22
93.8
11/291200813:22
NWA19
B742
D
22
93.7
11115/200813:40
NWA3
B744
D
22
92.6
11/13/200813:20
NWA19
B744
D
22
89.6
11/28/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
22
87.7
11/27/200813:19
NWA19
B744
D
22
87.2
11/04/200813:14
NWA19
B744
D
22
87.1
11/05/200813:11
NWA19
B744
D
22
83.9
11/01/2008 7:31
BMJ64
BE80
D
17
81.8
(RMT Site#1 8)
75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfield
.. ......... ..
MIL
tT k.
..#Qwq B
P R I NR�
U
in
��W L 1 g H -Departure r
P P -In
a
11/29/200813:22
NWA19
B742
D
22
100.4
11/05/2008 13:11
NWA19
B744
D
22
1 Q0.2
11/13/200813:20
NWA19
B744
D
22
99.3
11/03/200813:30
NWA19
B744
D
22
98.9
11/04/200813:14
NWA19
B744
D
22
98.6
11/15/200813:39
NWA3
B744
D
22
97.8
11/27/200813:19
NWA19
B744
D
22
97.7
11115/200813:26
NWA19
B744
D
22
95.7
11/14/200813:32
NWA19
8744
D
22
95.4
11/28/200813:20
NWA19
8744
D
22
95
- 28 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#1 9)
1 a4-1- A— n - ... - -
(RMT Site#20)
Ave., Richfield
Barbara Ave
(RMT S�ite#21�)�`
& 67th Rt lnwm, it - - . .
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
-29-
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#22)
Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heiqhts
RNIT N. C
UM , , m
M!i It
!NN A N r
1A., 'I lip. nili P
U 1 i ii�
�N� - z - H-Iiiiin
:' j':::--1 j! - D - -
P NN 7,iiii I!
11/30/200819:59 1NWA796 DC9Q A 30R 82.1
11/10/200810:26
NWA741
B757
A
30R
82.1
11/08/200817:43
AAL1 371
MD80
A
30R
82
11/30/200816:36
AAL417
MD80
A
30R
82
11/04/200816:07
NWAI 32
DC9Q
D
12R
81.2
11/14/200814:28
NWA737
DC9Q
A
30L
81
11/13/2008 21:30
NWA759
DC9Q
A
30R
80.7
11/07/2008 7:42
NWA428W
DC9Q
D
12R
80.4
11/13/2008 6:43
DAU 747
MD80
D
12R
79.9
11/05/200810:38
NWA454
DC9Q
D
12R
79.4
(RMT Site#23)
End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota Heiqhts
� �r- I .:;; . - 1 wn;�111.11',Aiin
-Y N
a e ....... . . Runway"Nit
01-M
N'. T N
r N -N NN ig _ t ; - - - �'!- K-1
.;!. 1. N: P E ;N-
11/06/200815:53
NWAI 39
DC9Q
D
12L
95.3
11/28/2008 22:25
NWA1469
DC9Q
D
12L
95.2
11/12/200817:22
NWA1737
DC9Q
D
12L
94.7
11/12/200814:38
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
94.7
11/25/200814:29
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
93.7
11/01/200814:23
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
93.7
11/28/2008 21:19
NWAI 148
DC9Q
D
12L
93.4
11/03/200814:26
NWA1471
DC9Q
D
12L
93.3
11/12/2008 20:27
NWA796
DC9Q
D
12L
93.1
11/03/2008 21:41
NWA796
DC9Q
D
12L
93.1
(RMT Site#24)
Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln., Eaqan
Date/Time NP 19 . .... . Numb.
I iii! --' -. '' N Y- "'� 1. VAN , -i"4
INN -"RV3 1.1 -T1!li;"-'II-!i1 NOO, -Plllip
P 4 ,rN MIS fl S
12T. it
N,I
NO Departure. Nl-� h q-
. .... n 2.7"
11/08/2008 17:26
NWA1 147
8757
A
30R.
88.7
11/08/2008 9:09
NWA9900
DC9Q
A
30L
87.9
11/14/20081:02
CC13711
B72Q
D
12R
86.7
11/06/2008 22:54
CC11705
B72Q
D
12R
86.5
11/13/200815:41
NWA751
DC9Q
A
30L
86.1
11/29/2008 7:17
AAL1461
MD80
D
12R
85.9
11/02/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
12R
85.7
11/22/200817:34
NWA9818
8742
D
12R
85.4
11/05/2008 6:44
DALI 747
MD80
D
12R
85.2
11/05/2008 10:37
NWA454
DC9Q
D
12R
85.1
- 30 - Report Generated: 12112/2008 07:51
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#25)
Mnnnchina Park 1'Z71 D,4
Date/Time, Flight Number Alrcraft'Type
AtnvaU y "Runway
.. :L,,� ,;r , '_. :>,: :_; .....:; ' ,;•;:`+ r, `Departure '.r I k
Lmax(dB '
: departureRi
11/21/200811:57
DAL651
MD80
p
12R
I'+ .(..:,
11/02/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
12R
82.1
11/07/2008 9:11
NWA1467
DC9Q
D
12R
81.3
11/10/2008 8:15
NWA638
A320
A
30L
80.9
11/07/2008 22:49
SCX704
8738
A
30L
80,9
11/18/200819:37
NWA924
DC9Q
D
17
80.4
11/24/2008 7:21
Unknown
F900
A
30L
80,3
11/04/2008 13:15
NWA19
B744
D
22
80.2
11/27/200810:23
NWA623
A320
A
30L
80,2
11/07/200812:33
DAL1621
MD80
D
12R.
79,9
11/02/200813:21
NWA19
8744
D
12R
79,7
(RMT Site#26)
679(3 Arkancac Ava IN Invor U-;-1-4.-
11/22/2008
,,:.-1-4.-
kr\IVI 1 OILfdtl-L/ )
Anthonv Schnnl S7 -q7 In/inr, Awn c
1 Date/Time ` Flight Number rcraft Type GArrival/r' y i
.. :L,,� ,;r , '_. :>,: :_; .....:; ' ,;•;:`+ r, `Departure '.r I k
11/23/200814.16
.I
DAL1563
11/22/200$ 13.42
NWA19
B744
p
12R
85.8
11/02/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
12R
85.2
11/18/200813:21
NWA19
B744
D
12R
84,7
11/11/200814:30
NWA19
B744
87,5
11/10/200814:30
DAL1563
MD80
D
30L
D
12R
84.3
11/22/200814:09
NWA3
B744
D
12R
84.3
11/12/2008 13:17
NWA19
B744
D
12R
83.7
11/18/2008 22:59
NWA145
DC9Q
D
12L
83
11/21/2008 14:58
NWA19D
8744
D
12F2
82.9
11/18/200811:28
NWA9900
DC9Q
85.4
11/16/200812:26
DAL1621
MD80
D
30L
D
12L
82,3
11/05/2008 22:23
NWA144
DC9Q
D
12L
81.7
kr\IVI 1 OILfdtl-L/ )
Anthonv Schnnl S7 -q7 In/inr, Awn c
1 Date/Time ` Flight Number rcraft Type GArrival/r' y i
.. :L,,� ,;r , '_. :>,: :_; .....:; ' ,;•;:`+ r, `Departure '.r I k
11/23/200814.16
.I
DAL1563
,. .r,,::� .
.:
,,;.,`, Y ..:.. ;: r
�.'.' 'r ,
MD80
D
30L
88
11/28/200814:18
DAL1563
MD80
D
30L
87,8
11/30/2008 9:11
DAL798
MD80
D
30L
87,5
11/10/200814:30
DAL1563
MD80
D
30L
87,1
11/29/200815:26
DAL1563
MD80
D
30L
86,7
11/15/200812:29
DAL1621
MD80
D
30L
86.4
11/17/2008 7:20
AAL1461
MD80
D
30L
86.1
11/16/200810:36
NWA454
DC9Q
D
30L
85.4
11/26/2008 7:21
AAL1461
MD80
D
30L
85.4
11/16/200812:26
DAL1621
MD80
D
30L
85.3
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 -31 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#28)
6645 16th AvP_ I;-- Richfield
Date/Time?�'�
U H ght umber 916
401 IT
i.--h 0 fl�VU JY
H H'i -� i :�111�:C 1. � t 1 '74 Ri:
Nil RNHI M UOY
11.1112, ggVQI�ii"Iill- I " - . i j'�.. # I
YNN !T i .. ; 11 'R, - I,
A. IF RIC, 11 1, 11.0 H MI. 2
j: PI f. IN .11 HH,
T,
TONI"
11/24/2008 9:24 AAL1330 MD80 D 30L 91.8
11/14/200816:32
NWAI 32
DC9Q
D
30L
91.3
11/16/200819:19
NWA1496
DC9Q
D
30L
91
11/16/200813:40
NWA1696
DC9Q
D
30L
91
11/21/2008 7:12
NWA1428
DC9Q
D
30L
90.9
11/09/2008 9:24
CPZ2005
E170
D
30L
90.2
11/02/200819:24
AAL391
MD80
A
35
89.3
11/15/200816:34
NWA1 32
DC9Q
D
30L
89.2
11/27/2008 8:53
AAL2427
MD80
D
30L
89.2
11/20/2008 23:01
CC11705
B72Q
D
30L
89
(RMT Site#29)
Ericsson Elem. School 431.9 31st Avi- R Minnpnnnfiq
-Bab IT
ff 1, M-11 k -m- -NT
M.- 4gf".jM Iun. WMO FtM O'Hil ..... ......
R
h. 'I A
Kt tir Departure
11/13/200814:51
NWA865
DC9Q
D
30R
.88.9
11/08/200811:41
AAL1 120
MD80
D
30R
88.8
11/13/200816:03
AAL408
MD80
D
30R
87.9
11/26/2008 7:16
NWA744
DC9Q
D
30R
86.9
11/25/2008 9:33
AAL1330
MD80
D
30R
85.9
11/27/2008 8:12
1 AAL718
MD80
D
30R
85.8
11/27/200811:35
AAL1 120
MD80
D
30R
85.8
11/13/200814:42
AAL354
MD80
D
30R
85.7
11/18/2008 6:53
BMj54
BE80
D
30R
85.5
11/23/200817:11
NWA758
DC9Q
D
30R
85.4
(KM I bite#30)
8715 River Ridge Rd Rlnnminritnn
3" o "A "a W e(d'g
Mo
...S'
Nt".
PI!
IN
11/13/200816:13
NWA1 32
DC9Q
D
17
95.5
11/13/200813:49
NWAI 696
DC9Q
D
17
94.2
11/07/200813:45
NWA497
DC9Q
D
17
93.8
11/11/200814:54
NWA1 529
DC9Q
D
17
93.7
11/05/200813:46
NWA497
DC9Q
D
17
93.3
'11/10/200810:37
NWA454
DC9Q
D
17
93.3
11/05/200817:30
NWA746
DC9Q
D
17
93.2
11/11/200816:36
NWAI 32
DC9Q
D
17
92.9
11/01/200811:39
NWA1231
DC9Q
D
17
92.8
13:49
NWAI 696
DC9Q
D
17
92.3
- 32 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#31)
qsni 19th A%fck -IQ Plr%nr";nr>+ n
Date/Tlme , F F�Ight Number , Aircraft Type � ,Arnval/ �, Runway' �max(dBj r ^
54 gl. Igii mti
H41 Mi.
Departure 4 +r 4O-T!P
11/04/2008 13:15 NWA19 8744 D 22 92.5
11/05/200813:11
NWA19
8744
—D
22 --88—.2
81.1
11/03/200813:30
NWA19
B744
D
22
84.6
11/29/200813:22
NWA19
8742
D
22
84.1
11/06/2008
AAL2479
MD80
D
17
82.5
11/13/200815:07
DAL1563
M080
D
30L
82.3
11/29/200813:46
NWA497
DC9Q
D
17
82.1
11/21/2008 6:42
BMJ64
BE80
D
17
81.7
11/04/200811:16
AAL1683
MD80
D
17
80,7
11/18/2008 7:09
BMJ64 EBES80
BE80
D
17
80.6
(RMT Site#32)
10325 Plpq--,Pnt Aim -0,
P-
11/13/2008 22:48 NWA1751 DC9Q D 17 81.8
11/29/200813:23
NWA19
B742
D --22
17
81.1
11/19/2008 7:07
NWAl 38
DC9Q
D
30L
79.2
11/12/200814:34
NWA1529
DC9Q
— D
17
79.1
11/06/200818:57
AAL2479
MD80
— D
17
78.5
11/03/2008 16:12
CPZ1925
E170
D
17
78.3
11/26/2008 22:44
NWA144
DC9Q—
—D
30R
78
11/13/200815:39
NWAl 176
DC9Q
D
30L
76.6
11/22/200813:26
AAL2074
MD80
D
17
76.2
11/21/2008 6:42
BMJ64
BE80
D
17
76.2
k IVI I OlLeff,53)
Nnrth Rh/car Pilic OnAr Pvirn—Allam
AircraftDate/1 Ime Flight rNumbe`r-
A
11/29/200813:23 NWA19 B742 D 22 86.5
11/13/200811:14
AALl 683
MD80
—D
17
81-2
11/29/2008
AALl 683
MD80
D
17
80.8
11/18/200819:29
NWA1535
DC9Q
D
17
80.6
11/13/200815:07
DAU 563
MD80
D
30L
80-2
11/06/200819:23
NWA1535—
DC9Q
—D
17
80.1
11/12/2008
DOJ129
MD80
D
17
79.6
11/05/200813:47
NWA497
DC9Q
D
—1-7
79
11/05/200811:25
�,�LI683
MD80
D
17
79
11/04/200812:37
UAL443 ---
— B733
D
17
78.9
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 33 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#34)
Red Oak Park- Riirn.-,villp
. . . . . . . . . . .
A,INK, ilty
HE
r
I'M Pil.N K 'n .ug -,-, --- -
ll.0 ;HM2 12FIRIS Am,%,11.1, il�.
W 1: AEN R �j g.. $Ml Hig-011, HHO
P.1, ggplg.
DAU 747
MD80
D
1 7
W!
MY RE
. .....
11/13/200813.50
NWA1696
DC9Q
D
17
80.2
11/13/2008 22:28
NWA144
DC9Q
D
17
78.8
11/07/200814:04
AAL1074
MD80
D
17
78.5
11/13/200811:59
NWA452
DC9Q
D
17
77.7
11/1312008 21:52
FDX1618
DC1 0
D
17
77.5
11/06/2008 8:50
AAL2427
MD80
D
17
77.2
11/05/200811:25
AALI 683
MD80
D
17
76.9
11/13/2008 22:16
UPS555
DC8Q
D
17
76.9
11/29/200811:22
AAL 1683
MD80
D
17
76.2
11/10/2008 6:18
1 AAL1462
MD80
D
17
76.2
(RMT Site#35)
2100 Garnet I n-- Fqnqn
u V'I TINAFlight Number U
5R`� r,
T� '4 -jig l
g.g
-MDA! M A
iPW H jQ-
11/27/2008 6:52
DAU 747
MD80
D
1 7
85.9
11/27/2008 6:13
AAL1462
MD80
D
17
85.8
11/13/2008 7:31
AAL1461
MD80
D
17
85.4
11/28/2008 6:55
DALI 747
MD80
D
17
84.9
11/12/200811:56
NWA452
DC9Q
D
17
84.9
11/03/200810:45
NWA454
DC9Q
D
17
84.2
11/06/200816:50
AAL408
MD80
D
17
83.8
11/17/2008 22:53
CC1705
B72Q
D
17
83.6
11/27/2008 6:46
NWA448N
DC9Q
D
17
82.9
11/02/200810:44
NWA454
DC9Q
D
17
82.1
(Kivi i zjitei;6b)
Briar Oaks & Srnijt Pond Annip \/Pllp\/
a e i gnegTH-I'M 9i§hCNUffi4 ,Mn"
TypeHP.
-A p, Rjan R -511 121111IMP"N"-11' M'H`�:H HIM H,K!
SO! nu ep ME
". !L.- -li,ll,,j.;l
p F
!i gm,.M.lq� w., !gq 'I!,
11/20008:' 14:09
NVVAl 86
B757
A
35
86.8
11/26/200811:22
NWA594
B757
A
35
83.2
11/13/200819:48
BMJ69
BE80
A
35
81.3
11/13/200811:46
NWA148
DC9Q
D
17
81.3
11/16/200817:47
NWA1534
DC9Q
A
35
80.8
11/23/2008 21:36
NWA142
DC9Q
D
17
80.7
11114/2008 6:15
AAL1462
MD80
D
17
80.2
11/06/200810:26
NWA134
DC9Q
D
17
79.9
11/19/2008 6:08
AAL1462
MD80
D
17
79.8
11/28/2008 6:17
AAL1462
MD80
D
17
79.7
- 34 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
November 2008
(RMT Site#37)
4399 Woodclate Ln. N.- Facian
M e;i
F k Flight Number I Aircraft Type grrwal/ APYHII�
Im g i 1.
-1 , 0 �i - 4
U " I ,, !J 11
11/29/200813:24
NWA19
8742
D
22
86.9
11/25/200811:43
NWA148
DC9Q
D
17
83.6
11/07/2008 9:24
AAL718
MD80
D
17
82.5
11/06/200815:57
NWA1 176
DC9Q
D
17
82.3
11/03/200813:42
AALI 074
MD80
D
17
82
11/07/200812:08
AAL1 120
MD80
D
17
81.7
11/13/2008 8:56
AAL2427
MD80
D
17
81.4
11/12/200817:05
NWA458
DC9Q
D
17
81.2
11/04/200813:19
AAL1 074
MD80
D
17
80.9
11/12/200810:17
NWA134
DC9Q
D117
17
80.8
(RMT Site#38)
3957 Turcluoise Cir.. Eaaan
M "c Type'` r 4
mji-y- -1 Om -A- 9 L
, "";:1 Flight It. 0
.;i:ii g P .5 R
Departures Emil 1.
11/29/200813:40
NWA1696
DC9Q
D
17
85
11/05/200813:23
AAL1074
MD80
D
17
84.8
11/13/2008 8:55
AAL2427
MD80
D
17
83.7
11/05/200810:19
NWA134
DC9Q
D
17
83.6
11/05/2008 7:32
AAL1461
MD80
D
17-
83.5
11/22/2008 9:14
NWA1 52
DC9Q
D
17
83.3
11/12/200812:17
AALI 120
MD80
D
17
82.8
11/07/2008 9:23
AAL718
MD80
D
17
82.7
1 11/29/200813:36 1
NWA754:�:[
DC9Q
D
17
82.4
1 11/29/200810:44 1
NWA454
I DC9Q
D
17
82.2
(RMT Site#39)
3477 St. Charles Pl.. Eacian
MT e
Number Arrival/ R'fiW591
i, , N.
N,
P'N
g 9: 1 V:
N . .... :...DepartureH
11/25/2008 11:42
AAL1 120
MD80
D
17
86.7
11/05/200811:41
AAL 1120
MD80
D
17
86.2
11/13/2008 8:09
AAL718
MD80
D
17
85.3
11/12/200817:33
AAL408
MD80
D
17
85.1
11/06/2008 8:09
AAL718
MD80
D
17
85
11/04/200813:16
NWA19
B744
D
22
84.7
11/29/200814:40
AAL354
MD80
D
17
84.4
11/18/200814:44
AAL354 I
MD80
D
17
84.3
11/12/200815:34
AAL354
MD80
D
17
--84
11/03/200811:35
AALI 120
MD80
D
17
83.9 1
November 2008 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary
The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for November 2008 were comprised of 88.7%
departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the DC9Q with 33.6% of the highest Lmax
events.
November 2008 Technical Advisor Report Notes
Unknown fields are due to unavailability of FAA flight track data. Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the
month of November 2008.
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51 - 35 -
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
November 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
H
11/01/2008
58.3
61.3
64
60.2
68
66.6
48.6
37
44.1
55.2
46.1
30.8
53.5
61.1
56.9
11/02/2008
59.1
58
65
60.8
69.4
70
53.7
55.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
57.9
61.1
58.8
11/03/2008
59.1
61
63.8
61.7
67.9
68.4
36.6
41
1 NA
NA
I NA
NA
58.7
63.4
60.5
11/04/2008
59.2
61.5
64.9
61.9
68
67.6
41.9
37.31
NA
32.21
33
1 NA
57.3
61.5
60.3
11/05/2008
61.1
64.4
65
164.3
68.2
70.8
43.6
NA
40.6
26.9
40.2
44.3
57.9
63.9
61.8
11/06/2008
61.6
63.9
66.31
64
70.2
70.1
50.2
47.4
42.6
32.2
39.1
NA
57.8
64.8
61
11/07/2008
57.7
59.9
62.4
60.4
68.9
73.4
61.5
57.6
42.2
53.4
53.4
NA
51.5
62.6
56.8
11/08/2008
53.9
55.3
58.5
57.5
66.8
70.4
63.5
58.2126.71
52
52.7
28.2
NA
160.8
39.1
11/09/2008
54
54.5
55.7
59.1
67.7
72
62.1
59.6
26.3
NA
NA
28.6
27.7
58.4
42.6
11/10/2008
51.9
55.8
58.2
59.2
67.2
68.7
j 60.1
56.8
NA
NA
NA
33.5
52
60.2
54.8
11/11/2008
61.2
63.2
66.3
62.9
69.6
68.6
49.3
49.2
49.5
43.4
44.9
49.4
56.3
63.9
59.6
11/12/2008
58.2
60.6
65.5
60.7
69.5
67.4
42.7
24.8
42.6
NA
NA
42.2
56.3
60.5
60.1
11/13/2008
58.2
59.8
64.4
61.5
69.6
72.5
55.8
59.41
NA
34.1128.9,
NA
54
160.2
57.3
11/14/2008
55
54.1
60.1
59.9
69.6
72.7
63.9
59.81
NA
NA
I NA
I NA
45.9
65.3
44.8
11/15/2008
52.3
54.3
56.21
59
68.90
71.4
62.4
58.1
45.2
26.9
35.3
NA
NA
59.4
40.7
11/16/2008
56
54.1
57.9156.7,68.3
71.4
62.6
58.3
24.6
NA
36.6
32.8
33.6
58.2
39.3
11/17/2008
53.7
54.8
57
56.7
65.9
71.2
61.9
60.4
52.3
48.7
47.61
NA
NA
58.4
39.3
11/18/2008
57.5
59.1
61.5
60
166.3
67.11
47
51.4
NA
NA
NA I
NA
51.9
60.8
58.1
11/19/2008
53.7
57.4
59.7
61
67.4
71.7
61.1
59.6
32.5
NA
36.71
NA
55.1
61.4
55.2
11/20/2008
53.2
50
55.5
58.2
66.2
71.4
63.8
59.2
NA
NA
NA
39
NA 158.7
39.5
11/21/2008
55
57.6
61.7
60.5
66.5
68.3
53.5
56.7
NA
25.3
NA
NA
54.2
58.8
59.1
11/22/2008
59.1
62.7
63.2
62.4
66.9
68.6
34.1
36.3
NA
35.2
33
NA
57.4
64.8
60.1
11/23/2008
57.6
56.1
61.1
59.2
66.8
72 156.5
57.7
NA I
NA
NA
NA
48
59.2
49
11/24/2008
52
54
57.8
57.7
66.7
72.2
62.2
59.4
36.7
NA
42
NA
32.4
58.7
43.1
11/25/2008
53.7
56.2
60.1
58.6
66.6,
67.6
55
51.7
25.6
34.8
37.8
8
33.6
53.8
63.9
57
11/26/2008
54.6
56
59.7
60.6
68
73.5
61.3
60.3
41.8
27.3
9
45.9
37.1
39.6
60.7
43.2
11/27/2008
54.3
47.2
52.5
51.9
62.3
66.2
57.3
53.91
NA
28.6
NA
NA
31.2
58.5
43.2
11/2812008
53 .52.7
57 .56.5
64.3
68.4
57.1
56.71
NA
NA
NA
24.9
54.2
60.1
56 1
11/29/2008
58.5
59.4
61.5
61.1
68.3
72.3
56.6
57.2
32.7
37.2
35.8
35.5
51.8
62.9
53.7
11/3012008
53.6
53.2
59.8
60
69.7
74
62.7
59.8
NA
27.81
NA
306
59.5
39.9
N5
3.
- 36 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
November 2008,
Remote Monitoring Towers
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
-37-
11/01/2008
63.9
39.5
57.4
52.8
30.3
51.7
51.1
63.1
57.1
53.9
54
41
59.1
36.9
11/02/2008
63.6
28.5
53.8
52
NA
56.9
53.6
66.9
57.5
50.8
56.8
53.4
53.7
45.7
11/03/2008
61.8
NA
60.455.7
24.
.5
52.4
67.3
58.5
53.4
59.7
31.3
58.3
35.9
11/04/2008
63.9
47.1
60.3
54.1
H56
NA
51.7
55.5
66.1
59.4
54
j 57.1
37.1
j 56.8
j NA
11/05/2008
63.5
45.4
61.1
5
38.6
55.7
54.3
65.6
59.3
51.8
59.4
36.1
61.8
37.8
11/06/2008
66
.41.2
57.3
54.6
37.2
55.9
58.3
66.2
62.4
54.5
56.9
44.5
56.8
44.7
11/07/2008
66.8
45.2
55.9
53.7
47.3
46.8
58.5
60.5
61.6
54.6
52.4
55.4
58.3
54.61
11/08/2008
65.7
NA
44.1
25
40
29.3
58.5
47.7
61.2
33
43.4
56.6
61.1
56.5
11/09/2008
63.3
30.5
47.8
47.6
44.3
NA
55.7
43.5
58.2
34.2
41.8
56.1
58.2
53.9
11110T2008
63.9
43.6
56.4
52.5
48.2
46.4
54.4
61.2
58.4
46.9
52.9
54.9
56.8
51.2
11/11/2008
66
143.8
59.2
56.7
34.5
52.3
55.9
64.7
60.8
52.9
56.8
44.1
60.8
27.1
11/12/2008
64.2
NA
58.8
54
NA
54.4
54.8
66.7
57.3
52.8
54.9
NA
55.6
NA
11/13/2008
64.1
51.7
62.2.57.6
48.9
50.5
57.1
60.6
59.8
51
52.9
52
57.6
56.7
11/14/2008
67.1
54
58
53.6
50.8
37.7
60.4
53.5
63.2
36-9152.4
57
60.5
56.8
11/15/2008
65.11
55
58.2
49.3
44
26.4
57.2
48.5
60.2
31.7
41.5
58.5
59.2
54.91
11/16/2008
62.9
38.1
42.6
32.4
45.3
43.2
55.4
44.8
58.6
31.3
41.3
57.3
59.9
55.9
11/17/2008
63.6
43.7
56.9
54.5
52.4
31.3
54.6
46.1
57.8
41.4
38
56.3
59.2
57.5
11/18/2008
63.1
44.3
60.5
56.6
45.8
54.2
56.6
61.9
59.8
53.6
57
46.2
57.9
54.6
11/19/2008
65.5
36.1
51.7
50.4
48.9
51.5
57.9
60.4
60.9
47.5
50.6
57.5
61.1
55.2
11/20/2008
65.4
41.4
45.4.39.1
49.5
39.9
56.3
43.7
59.4
45
41.7
56.2
62.6
57.9
11/21/2008
63.6
48.4
54.8
153.6
52.8
54.3
50.2
55.1
64.5
58.5
47.9
52.5
48.5
56.4
55.1,
11/22/2008
66.6
39.2
58
NA
50.3
55.7 .
66.1
62.8
55.4
56
42.2
56.7
33.3
11/23/2008
62.8
33.3
52.3
48.7
38.7
48
54.7
59
57.7
42
52.5
54.5
55.6
56
11/24/2008
63.5
40
51.5
50.4
41.5
NA
56.6
46.6
58.8
44.3
41.4
56.6
60.2
58.3
11/25/2 ' 008
67.4
47.3157.91
55
44.8
55.1
57.9
65.3
61.8
49.5
57.7
52.2
55.7
50.6
11/26/2008
65.9
51.1
59.1
56.1
54.1
42
56.7
50.3
60.1
48.9
50.1
55.5
60.5
55.9
11/27/2008
63.6
49.4
57.5
51.4
46.4
NA
55.4
502
58.9
43.5
46.9
53.7
55.1
54.2
11/28/2008
64.4
49.8
56.2
54
48.4
54.9
55.1
66
58.4
50.6
53.1
53.6
54.3
51.2
11/29/2008
65.1
52.8
59.4
53.1
41.1
49.9
56
59.9
59.7
48.1
56.1
54.5
55.2
48.8
111/30/2008
65.3
25.9 44.2
NA
31
39.T457.3
46.8
59.9
32
40.5
57.3 59.7
53.1
L4
Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
-37-
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
November 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
- 38 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
11/01/2008
62.3
45.6
36.3
42.5
35.5
47.1
38.9
48.6
49.3
51.9
11/02/2008
59
32.5
25.8
47
32.8
49.9
51.6
47.1
49.2
51.6
11/03/2008
60.5
48.7
43.6
42.7
NA
47.9
41.9
48.4
52.9
55.2
11/04/2008
61.1
52.3
40.8
45
35.5
49.4
33.9
49.9
52.9
55.9
11/05/2008
61.8
49.5
38.5
44.2
39.4
44.9
31.4
49.4
53.9
55,4
,11/06/2008
63.3
51.9
48
45.8.
41
51.3
45.1
49.2
52.2
54
11/07/2008
63.5
46.9
39.5
43.8
40.4
52.5
49
51.2
52.7
48.71
11/08/2008
48.9
NA
NA
NA
28.9
52.1
55.1
NA
NA
NA
11/09/2008
60
.42.7
46.1
44.5
NA
153.1
55.4
NA
34
NA
11/10/2008
64.7
43.4
43.4
43.1
48.5
56.9
56.1
46.3
39.9
39.41
11/11/2008
63.6
47.8
37.6
45.6
31.5
49.4
30.2
50
52.9
53.91
11/12/2008
63.6
43.1
35.4
48.1
40
51.5
37.4
51.5
53.3
56.5
11/13/2008
67.2
53.1
54.9
53.7
54.6
57.2
55.4
46
49.7
50.8
11/14/2008
63
45.8
45.7
44.6
40
1 57
57.7
39.8
40
139.3
11/15/2008
60.3
36.5
45.8
38.3
41.7
52.9
55.6
27.2
NA
NA
11/16/2008
49.1
28.5
28.8
26.2
NA
51
53.8
29.4
NA
NA
11/17/2008
63.2
28.4
48.2
46.4
43.4
56.9
54.4
45.1
39.3
NA
11/18/2008
64.6
52.1
42.7
46.7
46.7
54.5
53.5
46.4
49
54.2
11/19/2008
62.1
41.7
46.7
43.5
44.9
57.8
58.2
40.7
NA I
NA
11/20/2008
47.9
NA
NA
NA
28.6
49.9
53.3
NA
NA
38.5
11/21/2008
62.5
52.6
48
45.2
36.6
51.8
50.1
41.3
48.4
52.8
11/22/2008
60.8
48.6
43.7
42.1
NA
47.31
NA
49.9
51.9
54.2,
11123/2008
61.8
41.4
41 144.9
38.7
53.7
54.4
37.9
27.4
NA
11/24/2008
61.9
41.5
NA 145.5
43.4.
58.5
56.8
37.6
NA
NA
11/25/2008
64.3
47.3
44.3
48.1
41.7
55.4
54.2
48.3
49.4
52.4
11/26/2008
66.6
48.9
49.6
52.5
49.11
59 1
59.4
48.1
27.4
37.4
11/27/2008
61.9
NA
NA
43.7
41.1
60.2
57.1
49.7
42.5
36.5
11/28/2008
64.21
36
45.4
40.1
42.9
58.6
57.4
39.7
NA
NA
11/29/2008
62.3
49.6
45.3
50.6
43.8
51.5
51.4
49.7
51.1
52.11
11/30/2008
47.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
49.3
51.6
NA
NA
NA
- 38 - Report Generated: 12/12/2008 07:51
Metropolitan Airports Commission
3240 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in October 2008
3064 (94.6%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor
W11
3240 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure
Operations
N
giffle, MW
. . . . . . . . . .
- - - - - - - ......
lu 5
_%1101N��'�!"
V
�90
R
VUR� wi.
g, 1'6�
MRE
D"; !'n
M
............
_NN n.4"
I
T., 'g
"aii
Richfiel ti;�,.;z�qt��,' q
�3 _E
N
R M
'
_
W D Will-"
qf
I N,r z ;N t.
... ..... ..
T'
R
A
3064 (94.6%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier
Departure Operations in the Corridor
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for In Corridor Gate
10/01/2008 00:00:00 -10/31 /2008 23:59:59
3064 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1560 (50.9%), Right = 1504 (49.1 %
-M,
R-5
-lig "k 4a , - , __ " ri,'
IN
k., Fa Y
9r� z
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 11/06/2008 12:38 Page 1
Metropolitan Airports Commission
90 (2.8%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During October 2008
Of Those, 0( —)Returned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
z"
. .... ........
e,",1'� F7 T—
j
4r
NO pfilj�.% I
l'I
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate
10/01/2008 00:00:00 - 10/31/2008 23:59:59
90 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 48 (53.3%), Right = 42 (46.7%
Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 11/06/2008 12:38
Metropolitan Airports Commission
86 (2.7%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During October 2008
Of Those, 0( ®)Returned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
...... .....
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for South Corridor Gate
10/01/2008 00:00:00 - 10/31/2008 23:59:59
86 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left 43 (50%), Right 43 (50%)
............. i'II A
WN' Wt.'
tP
K,'41
9
'<
4j"Ifl
V-
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 11/06/2008 12:38 Page 3
C.
Metropolitan Airports Commission
4 (0.1 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 50
South of the Corridor (50 South of 30L Localizer) Durincl October 2008
2"b", -:v
&
`11� L
ow
I F Pl
Fill
V, INS;
R, 2NNI;
V
`3j L F- __It
Z;
7
=_Vy....... . ..
'k t.ge Grove -
, �,Ibijt le
--2
-A
z
j
_A_� Ri
U
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for 5* South Corridor Gate
10/01/2008 00:00:00 -10/31 /2008 23:59:59
4 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 3 (75%), Right = 1 (2,1
Page 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 11/06/2008 12:38
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Top 15 Runway 12L/1 2R Departure Destinations for October 2008
;Airport
Vo
„Ga 1 C 11
-114 0
L, n
99"r
Ops
Perce 9f'.
P,
ORD
CHICAGO (O'HARE)
124-
ill
3.4%
FAR
FARGO
3120
95
2.9%
SEA
SEATTLE
278-
1 93
2.9%
DTW
DETROIT
1050
87
2.7%
BIS
BISMARCK
2910
77
2.4%
ATL
ATLANTA
1490
73
2.3%
YYZ
TORONTO
950
69
2.1%
LAX
LOS ANGELES
2380
69
2.1%
SFO
SAN FRANCISCO
2510
64
2%
BOS
BOSTON
970
60
1.9%
YWG
WINNIPEG
3300
57
1.8%
PDX
PORTLAND
2720
56
1.7%
GRB
GREEN BAY
900
56
1.7%
GFK
GRAND FORKS
3160
52
1.6%
DEN
DENVER
237-
49
1.5%
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 11/06/2008 12:38 Page 5
11/01/2008 - 11
Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis
Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport
z
r.
VA. 3. x
g
xa €,
a
all
Mi h (-
11
All
ya! i z c
;5 r� NV �t yyyt✓�
This report is for informational purposes only
and cannot be used for enforcement purposes.
Metropolitan Airports Commission
2671 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in November 2008
2565 (96%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor
2671 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure
Operations '
2565 (96%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier
Departure Operations in the Corridor
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for In Corridor Gate
11/01/2008 00:00:00 -1 1 /30/2008 23:59:59
2565 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 1329 (51.8%), Right = 1236 (48.2%)
Q0
MR
32N'� ag, A"i
Al
-Rim,
16.c
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 12/11/2008 13:46 Page 1
Metropolitan Airports Commission
72 (2.7%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During November 2008
Of Those, 0( -IReturned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
'J' wq
Q.,
-Er
unir
7 � M_7.
f
paill Nit!
I
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for North Corridor Gate
11 /01 /2008 00:00:00 - 11/30/2008 23:59:59
72 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 37 (51.4%), Right = 35 (48.6%
Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 12/11/2008 13:46
Metropolitan Airports Commission
34 (1.3%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During November 2008.
Of Those, 0(—)Returned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
akdal
53
F
IL___._.J PI
It'i
�] Ell:
P�0?
P . � .4 , 'N
; Or
alot
N I
S
%
L:IV
;25� Of
a
1 -4
exv nus
ty,
Ulf
L
;;/)"77'1[:' :7,
A"I
�W
qI
gn'T.
'a Heighls.
N,
10
A
_71.
... ......
. ,
W
�x CI M17
lot.,
IN
0-
z'
X
pleXall!*-
I WN ME 17,
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 12/11/2008 13:46 Page 3
Minneapolis -St. Paul
U-'
Penetration Gate Plot for South Corridor Gate
0
11/01/2008 00:00:00 1/30/2008 23:59:59
1
4 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left 23 (67.6%), Right 11 (32.4%)
p'
Y
Yr 'p
. . . . . . . . . . .
"U. . .
41,UM
21
z z
-V
N' �'."�'N�,' 10
X,
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 12/11/2008 13:46 Page 3
Metropolitan Airports Commission
2 (0.1 %) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 50
South of the Corridor (5' South of 30L Localizer) During November 2008
NN
. .... . . ....
It PI
T".
4,
El
bm
_ed SalnLrN LLI 7=3
;f 'I, P,
L r,4 1, 11 ! 1
5, , ff 5
Y,
r JL
0 L, e jt ji li,@-Upw,
io.
i A
3 F) --
Ln Z_
!I .nt POO P z
. .. . .........
F-�
3",
J,
X
rrL
N
d1m.
6ple 'alley
07
Minneapolis -St. Paul
Penetration Gate Plot for 5' South Corridor Gate
11 /01 /2008 00:00:00 - 11/30/2008 23:59:59
2 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 2 (100%), Right = 0 (1
Page 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 12/11/2008 13:46
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Top 15 Runway 12L/1 2R Departure Destinations for November 2008
Air ort
ORD
Citya-I.-M-51H.0 44 4r
vo]� gF, im. !��! 11- , q: -'l r
iHz
CHICAGO (O'HARE)
011,11
'T
124-
S.
78
e,r
Percent �1!,
" Total "'TUR
EN? R
2.9%
SEA
SEATTLE
2780
77
2.9%
FAR
FARGO
3120
61
2.3%
ATL
ATLANTA
1490
61
2.3%
YYZ
TORONTO
950
59
2.2%
YWG
WINNIPEG
3300
56
2.1%
GRB
GREEN BAY
900
45
1.7%
BIS
BISMARCK
2910
44
1.6%
PDX
PORTLAND
2720
39
1.5%
DTW
DETROIT
1050
39
1.5%
DLH
DULUTH
190
38
1.4%
SFO
SAN FRANCISCO
2510
37
1.4%
LAX
LOS ANGELES
2380
34
1.3%
MOT
MINOT
3040
34
1.3%
BOS
BOSTON
970
31
1.2%
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 12/11/2008 13:46 Page 5
rPort NO Report
149
ise
A week?
y update on litigation regulations, and technological developments
Volume 20, Number 37
Bob Hope Airport November 7, 2008
T VA VAN ORITY OPPOSES STAGE 2 PHASEOUT
NUi'BUT SUPPORTS CURFEW THERE
The Burbank -Glendale -Pasadena Airport Authori
operates Bob Hope Airport, voted Nov. 3 to go on record GPAA), which owns and
Phaseout of Stage 2 aircraft at nearby Van Nuys A' pposinthe
general aviation froposed
acilities. y irport, one of the world's busiest
Aphaseout of Stage 2 aircraft at Van Nuys will
aircraft operations to Bob Hope Airport, the airport result in a shift of those noisier
authority said.
BGPAA added, however, that it does Support
hnpose a nighttime curfew identical to the �uprfew that ithashas proposed for Bob
Airportorts by Airport to
But BGPAA stron 1 o Hope
(LAWA g y Opposes the assertion by Los Angeles World
), proprietor of Van Nuys, that the proposed phaseout of Stage Airports c aft at
Van Nuys is not subject to a cost/benefit stud
tion's Part 161 Regulations on Notice and A y under the Federal Aviation A
strictions, Approval of drninRe-
An'port Noise and Access Re -
"It is clear that LAWA is
for a thorough trying to do an end run around the federal requirement
study and benefit -cost analysis of any new airport access restriction',,
Research (Continued on p. 150)
NASA AWARDS $12.4 MMLION IN CONTRACT
FOR CONCEPTS FOR FUTURE GREEN AgRC S
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
RAFT
ber that it has awarded research contracts watotal of $ 2.4 fanollion to ix industry
announced in Octo-
tearns to study advanced concepts for subsonic andtosupersonic commercialstry
aircraft that could enter service in 25 to 30 years, transport
NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate selected teams led by The
Boeing Company, GE Aviation, Lo Mission
Martin Corporation,
lute of Technology and NorthropP , Massachusetts Insti-
tracts valued at approximately $2 Million n o receive separate 18 -month study con -
The focus of the studies is on commercial transports that can overcome si
performance and environmental challenges for the benefit of the general public. The
work is intended to identifyic. The
es and key technology development needs, such as advanced air -
Propulsion propulsion systems, as well as breakthroughs that will enable such vehi-
cles to enter service in 2030-2035. The vehicles represent a research and development
generation c;irtflet as "N+31" denoting three generations beyond the curre t
In This Issue...
Van Nuys ... Authority for
Bob Hope Airport opposes
Proposed Stage 2 phaseout at
nearby Van Nuys Airport but
supports nighttime curfew
there identical to the one it
has proposed- p. 149
NASA ••• Agency awards
$12.4 million in contracts to
six industry teams to study
advanced concepts for sub-
sonic and supersonic aircraft
that would enter service in
25-30 years - p. 149
GAO ... Efforts to reduce
aircraft noise and emissions
are not mutually exclusive
but finding theright balance
between them will be a sig-
nificant challenge, GAO tells
House Committee - p• 151
Phoenix Sky Harbor Intl
• • . After more than 13 years,
the airport's Residential
Sound Mitigation Services
Program is entering its final
Phase p. 152
"The future of air transportation p n commer- Providence
.TF ortation is all about Protecting T.F. Green Air-
sponding to increasing energy costs in a balanced way," said Juan ironment.and re- port FAA announces ap-
Alonso, director of proval of airport noise
t (Co�etinued on p. Iso) exposure maps - p. 152
Airport Noise Report
November 7_ _ , 2008
Bob Hope, front P- 149
said BGPAA President Bill Wiggins.
The airport authority, he said, "firmly believes that
LAWNS attempt to ban daytime operations of noisier Stage 2
S without completing such a study of the costs
jets at Van Nuy
is improper, circumvents federal law, and merely transfers
Van
daytime noise from Los Angeles residents living near Van
Nuys Airport to Los Angeles and Burbank residents that live
near Bob Hope Airport-" meeting its
"We believe that Bob Hope Airport is already
obligations under the letter and spirit of the law to a natio o -
date noisier Stage 2 private jets still remaining in the national
fleet, and Van Nuys Airport should continue to do so as well.
However, what does make sense for both airports and their
neighbors is a curfew at night, and we'll 0 all airportsand ck Van NUYS 0
percent if it follows the rules that apply on all Stage 2 jets at
pursues that restriction. Pursuing FAA
this time makes it much more difficult to o�ggins dded.
roval of a meaningful nighttime curfew,
150
shifted Nuys Airport.
deserve the benefits of C
"Because all resident in the Valle
on record to sup -
nighttime noise relief, the Authority
impose a in
cur -
port efforts by Van Nuys Aire e Airport,
few identical to the curfew proposed at Bob Hop
provided that LAWA follows the strict procedures outlined i
federal law to seek FAA approvals," BGPAA said.
proposed phaseout of Stage 2 aircraft at, Van Nuys is
The prop ort Noisier Aircraft Phaseout Proj-
ect," which is the subject of a draft EIR that LAMA p
for comment (20 ANR 125)_e 2 phaseout requirement
LAWA contends that the Stag
efit analysis be -
would not be subject to a Part 161 cosc city
ordinance adopted
cause it was originally embodied r a city
in 1990 prior to passage of the Airport Noise and Capacity
Act (ANCA); which mandated promulgation of the Part 161
Regulations. grandfathered status of the origi-
LAWA contends that the conly changed the
nal ordinance is still intact because t has hased:out and left
dates by which Stage 2 aircraft must be p
p the rest of the ordinance intact.
DEIR Conclusions Challenged ort NASA, from p. 149
The BGPAA adopted a resolution that auutho authorizes a uimen- am at NASA's Head -
staff to submit comments on the Van Nuystions re- NASA's Fundamental n eros u 11 need rProgram
that are qui'
tal Impact Report challenging the report's assumptions fuels to
aiding eter and more fuel efficient, and c� S to introduce these
g the number of Stage 2 aircraft that would be shifted quarters in Washington.
to Burbank and other nearby airports tions that power them. We are challenging ng the convenience, safety
questioned the draft EIR assumptions s new technologies without imp ortation."
The Authority q Kase ac -
the and security of commercial air transp
g2 percent of these noisier jets that currently use Van Nuys The studies constitute the first phase of a two -p
Airport will disappear or install expensive "hush kits UY competitive down -selection process.
percent of the remaining Stage 2 jets a comp
year 2016, and that 34 p ort. quisition involving complete the first phase will be
will shift their operations to Camarillo Aire provides addi-
The Authority for Phase e which g technologies
« is convinced that this is van Nuys would asked dramatic ovto sub proposals uess y
estimation and that most jets diverted from tional funds for initial research on the enabling
end up at Burbank because Camarillo is not
is a large Part of identified in Phase 1 Pr
ects are listed below, including
Dank centered entertainment industry, s Airport and The phase 1 research p j
Wiggins noted. Camarillo currently serv- team members and award amounts.
the current business jet demand at both Van Nuy
Bob Hope Airport," Wigg et • Development of Subsonic Ultra arl�stitAiit coffTRol
search: The Boeing Company, Georgi
ices only about 7 percent of the combined general aviation j
$1.9 million.
traffic for the three airports, he said. GE Global Research and GE Aviatiuiet Air Transporta-
Bob Hope Airport has been conducting a Part f a Study, ogy,
as required by federal law, to gain FAA app
royal of a night •Small Commercial Efficient GE Q Global Research, Geor-
of completed gra Institute of Technology and Cessna Aircraft Company;
time
curfew from 10 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. That effort has taken tion for 2030-2035: GE Aviation,
eight years and cost over $6 million and is s $197 million. Concepts for an N+3 Subsonic
roach to the study. .Aircraft and Technology Aurora
because FAA criticism of the first app extensive com-
«pming the public outreach for this study, Research Inc., Pratt and Whin eY
d from hundreds of Burbank and Los An- Transport' ht Sc ences, AerodyneInstitute of Technology,
ments were receive 1 indicated that they gay g phantom Works; $2.13 milk
geles residents that overwhelming Y
Priority to implementation of `meaningful night- and Boeing Service in the 2030-2035 Time
the highestP has sought •Advanced Concept Studies for Subsonic Commercial
1 the Authority Aircraft Entering stems Corporation, Tufts Uni-
rime noise relief'. According Y� hest riorty for noise abate- TransportGroan Sy
approval of a frill curfew as its hig P Period: Northrop oration, Spirit Aerosystems Corp. and
ments," BGPAA said. the public comment period for versity, 5ensis Corp
dieing ttime Rotls-Royce North America Inc.; $1.97 million -
Earlier
Earlier this year, nigh i Supersonic Comm
the BGPAA's study, LAWA contested the proposed . Advanced Concepts Studies for
Airport on the grounds that no Stage 3
curfew at Bob Hop from Burbank should be Transport Aircraft Entering Service i the 2030-2035 Time
newer generation jet operations
Airport Noise Report
November 7, 2008
Period: The Boeing Company, Boeing Phantom Works, GE
Global Research, Georgia Institute of Technology, M4 Engi-
neering Inc., Pratt and Whitney, Rolls Royce and Wyle Labs;
$2.28 million.
• NASA N+3 Supersonic, Three Generations Forward in
Aviation Technology: Lockheed Martin Corporation, GE
Global Research, Purdue University and Wyle Laboratories;
$1.96 million.
GAO
BALANCE OF NOISE, EMISSIONS
WILL BE CHALLENGE, GAO SAYS
Efforts to reduce aircraft noise and emissions are not mu-
tually exclusive but finding the right balance between them
will be a significant challenge, the General Accountability
Office (GAO) told the House Science and Technology Com-
mittee Oct. 20.
GAO's assessment was included in a report to the Com-
mittee responding to questions posed to the agency at a Sept.
28 hearing on issues regarding development of the Next Gen-
eration Air Transportation System (NextGen).
In a GAO report submitted to the Committee in February,
the agency indicated that noise reduction technologies may
be limited by concerns about global warming because ad-
vances in noise reduction technologies could make it more
difficult to also achieve reductions in emissions of green-
house gases.
The Committee asked the GAO whether it was saying
that reduction in aircraft noise and emissions are mutually ex-
clusive.
Dr. Gerald Dillingham, director of GAO Physical Infra-
structure Issues, told the Committee, "I do not think that ef-
forts to achieve reductions in noise and emissions are
mutually exclusive, but finding the right balance between
them does pose a significant challenge for the partner agen-
cies and private stakeholders. It is technologically challeng-
ing to design aircraft that can reduce one environmental
concern without increasing another. Since the aviation indus-
try must consider economic as well as environmental con-
cerns, research must consider the trade-offs between noise
reduction, emissions reduction, and fuel economy.
"Engine technology has been relatively successful in in-
creasing fuel efficiency, reducing most types of emissions,
and lowering noise, but has not been able to achieve compa-
rable reductions in nitrogen oxide (NOx), which is a primary
source of local air pollution. NOx has increased because new
engines operate at higher temperatures, producing more
power with less fuel and lower carbon dioxide and carbon
monoxide emissions, but also producing higher NOx levels,
especially at takeoff and landing when engine power settings
are at their highest."
The Committee also asked GAO to elaborate on its asser-
tion that it may be more difficult and time consuming than
the Federal Aviation Administration and Joint Planning and
151
Development Office believe to fill the gaps that exist be-
tween basic research and the transfer of quieter and cleaner
technologies to the aviation industry.
Dillingham told the Committee that the proposed Contin-
uous Lower Energy, Emissions, and Noise (CLEEN) environ-
mental research and development program, which would be
funded in the House FAA reauthorization bill, illustrates that
challenge.
CLEEN would establish a research consortium of govern-
ment, industry, and academic participants that would allow
for the maturation of aviation noise technologies via demon-
stration projects for further refinement by the aviation indus-
try and eventual incorporation into new aircraft designs
The CLEEN program would support the development,
maturation, and certification of engine and airframe technolo-
gies for aircraft over the next 10 years to reduce aviation
noise and emissions.
Dillingham told the Committee, "While acknowledging
that CLEEN would help bridge the gap between NASA's
R&D and manufacturers' eventual incorporation of technolo-
gies into aircraft designs, aeronautics industry representatives
and experts we consulted said that the program's funding lev-
els may not be sufficient to attain the goals specified in the
proposal. According to these experts, the proposed funding
levels would allow for the further development of one or pos-
sibly two projects. Moreover, in one expert's view, the fund-
ing for these projects may be sufficient only to develop the
technology to the level that achieves an emissions -reduction
goal in testing, not to the level required for the technology to
be incorporated into a new engine design.
"According to FAA and some experts we consulted, how-
ever, the CLEEN program amounts to a pilot project, and if it
results in the development of emissions -reduction technolo-
gies that can be introduced into aircraft in the near future, it
could lead to additional funding from the government or in-
dustry for such efforts.
"Filling R&D gaps may also be more difficult and time-
consuming than envisioned because of uncertainties about the
ability of aircraft engine and aircraft manufacturers to incor-
porate new noise reduction technologies into new engine and
aircraft designs. NASA officials stressed that when NASA's
research ends, it will be up to engine and aircraft manufactur-
ers to take the next steps to integrate the noise reduction tech-
nologies into engine and aircraft designs, and the
manufacturers' willingness to do so is not guaranteed. An ex-
pert we consulted noted that if manufacturers do take the
steps to integrate noise reduction technologies into new de-
signs, the pace of noise reduction will also depend on the
pace of development for new aircraft and aircraft engine de-
signs.
"Moreover, technical challenges may further complicate
efforts to close the gap between agencies' research and manu-
facturers' development of technologies for incorporation into
products. In particular, it may be technically challenging to
design aircraft with reduced noise while, at the same time,
achieving significant reductions in greenhouse gases and
Airport Noise Report
November 7. 2008 152
ANR EDITORIAL
other emissions that will be required to address global warming and im-
prove air quality. Although it is possible to design engines that produce
ADVISORY BOARD
less noise and fewer greenhouse gas emissions, the reductions in green-
house gases could be limited in engines that produce substantially less
noise.
John J. Corbett, Esq.
"Furthermore, engines that produce less noise typically burn more
Spiegel & McDiarmid
fuel and are therefore more costly to operate. As a result, air carriers may
Washington, DC
not be inclined to buy jets with engines that reduce noise but may be
more expensive to operate," Dillingham told the Committee.
Carl E. Burleson
Director, Office of Environment and Energy
phoenix Sky Harbor Intl
Federal Aviation Administration
RESIDENTIAL. SOUND MITIGATION
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
SERVICES PROGRAM WRAPPING UP
Gatzlce, Dillon & Ballance
Carlsbad, CA
After more than 13 years of serving the communities surrounding
Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, the Residential Sound Mitiga-
Peter J. Kirsch, Esq.
tion Services (RSMS) program is entering its final phase, the airport an -
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
pounced Oct. 28.
Denver
"Since 1995, RSMS has helped residents living in noise impacted
areas surrounding Sky Harbor by installing new insulation as well as
Vincent E. Mestre, P.E.
sound insulated windows and doors to their homes. Since 1995, 1,564
President, Mestre Greve Associates
homes in Phoenix and Tempe have gone through the sound mitigation
Laguna Niguel, CA
process. The goal of the program was to create a more comfortable living
environment for residents by significantly reducing aircraft noise inside
Steven F. Pflaum, Esq.
each home," according to the airport.
McDermott, Will & Emery
Last October, RSMS completed its final community outreach in Sky
Chicago
Harbor's noise affected areas. Construction on the final 150 homes is
scheduled to be complete by February 2009. Funding for this program
Mary L. Vigilante
came from the city of Phoenix Aviation Department and the Federal Avia-
President, Synergy Consultants
tion Administration.
Seattle
Part 150 Program
FAA APPROVES NOISE EXPOSURE MAPS
FOR PROVIDENCE T.F. GREEN AIRPORT
On Oct. 31, the Federal Aviation Administration announced that noise
exposure maps for Providence-T.F. Green Airport, as submitted by the
Rhode Island Airport Corporation, are in compliance with federal require-
ments.
For further information, contact John Silva in FAA's New England
Region Airports Division; e-mail: john.silva@faa.gov.
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
e-mail: editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price $850.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients,
is granted by Aviation Emissions Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.
November 14, 2008
Q9: Sales proceeds must be used for eligible noise
l compatibility purposes on the airport. However, it is pro-
posed in the reauthorization that if there are no eligible
noise compatibility projects at the airport, the proceeds
may be applied (in descending order of priority) to an en-
vironmental mitigation project, to an AIP eligible devel-
opment project, to a noise compatibility project at
another airport; or failing all those, returned to the Trust
Fund. Given this pending flexibility, may an airport now
escrow sales proceeds pending reauthorization?
A9: Yes. The Program Guidance Ietter (PGL) includes a
sample escrow agreement that may be helpful.
Q10: Can Noise Land Inventories and Reuse plans be
paid for using Part 150 funds?
A10: If a grant for land acquisition is issued following a
Part 150 approval, then the costs for the reuse plan and in-
ventory map may be included in the land grant. It cannot be
included as a line item in the planning study to prepare a Part
150 study, but should be mentioned as a reminder in the ap-
proved measure.
Q11: What is the AIP eligibility for Noise Land In-
ventories and Reuse plans? Are they eligible as a stand
alone project?
All: No, they should be included as a line item in the
land acquisition grant to properly be in compliance with
Grant Assurance 31 and the PGL.
Q12: Can the Inventory and Reuse plan be funded as
a final element to a noise land acquisition project?
Al2: If all of the eligible work to acquire the noise land
is complete and there are funds remaining in the grant, the
scope of the grant may be amended to include these items.
Q13: If a sponsor owns multiple airports and they
have available proceeds from the sale of noise land at one
airport, can these proceeds be used on eligible noise proj-
ects at any of their airports?
A13: If disposal proceeds from noise lands have not or
cannot be reinvested in an AIP eligible noise project at the
airport, the federal share of the FW of the proceeds may be
transferred with FAA approval, to another airport noise proj-
ect at another airport. This is similar to current AIP policy on
transferring entitlements.
Q14: Can the proceeds of the sale of noise land be
used to fund the Inventories and Reuse plans?
A 14: Grant Assurance 31 provides that "the part of the
proceeds from disposing of the land that is proportional to
155
the Government's share of the cost of acquiring the land will
be paid to the Secretary for deposit in the Airport and Airway
Trust Fund established under Section 9502 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 9502) or, as the Secretary
Prescribes, reinvested in an approved noise compatibility
Project." The preferred option is that the proceeds be used for
other noise compatibility project work, but if all of the eligi-
ble work is complete and there are funds remaining, the pro-
ceeds can be used for these items.
Q15: What is eligible airport development land that
acquired noise land may be converted to or exchanged
for?
A15: As provided in PGL 08-02 (paragraph 4B(3)), air-
port development is defined as "development that is depicted
as future airport development land on the FAA approved Air=
Port Layout Plan (ALP) forprojects that are eligible forAJP
grant funds." For example unneeded noise land may be con-
verted for current or planned airside development, land
within current or planned runway RPZ or RSA's, land under-
lying approaches (Transitional and if justified Horizontal sur-
faces). Also AIP eligible landside development and eligible
Off airport use of land for navigational aid facilities and in-
stallation of airport utilities may be Alp eligible development
(see Alp Handbook at paragraph 701, Land Acquisition for
Current Airport Development).
Q16: May the sponsor retain unneeded noise land for
uses that are not eligible under Alp, e.g, land used for
commercial/industrial uses, public parldng lots or other
non -aeronautical revenue producing use?
A16: Yes, but the sponsor will need to `pay back" the
Federal funds at the appraised FW of the disposed land
used for non -eligible purposes. The sponsor will need to
place deed restrictions on the land to prevent incompatible
use or development. The deed restrictions need to be incorpo-
rated on the ALP.
Q17: May sales proceeds be applied to reimburse the
prior cost of noise land acquired with local funds?
A17: No, if the local funded noise land is sold, the spon-
sor would claim its reimbursement from its share of the sales
Proceeds. There is no additional eligible cost. If locally
funded acquired noise land is useful for an Alp eligible use,
then that land could be incorporated and would be eligible for
grant reimbursement of the land cost under an eligible devel-
opment use (with Uniform Act compliance certification).
Possibly when we get a reauthorization and there is a change
to the requirements on the use of noise land sale proceeds, we
could reach to reimburse the cost of such land needed for de-
velopment.
Airport Noise Report
November 14, 2008
ANREDITORIAL
John J. Corbett, Esq.
Spiegel & McDiarmid
Washington, DC
Carl E. Burleson
Director, Office of Environment and Energy
Federal Aviation Administration
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance
Carlsbad, CA
Peter J. Kirsch, Esq.
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
Denver
Vincent E. Mestre, P.E.
President, Mestre Greve Associates
Laguna Niguel, CA
Steven F. Pflaum, Esq.
McDermott, Will & Emery
Chicago
Mary L. Vigilante
President, Synergy Consultants
Seattle
156
E::: In Brief..
Airbus Establishes Noise Research Center
Airbus has established a new research center at the University of
Southampton in England to address the pressing environmental issue of
quiet solutions for future airliners.
aircraft noise by identifying
The Airbus Noise Technology Centre at the University of Southamp-
ton will work to find ways to reduce the noise generated by airliners.
The University of Southampton said it has a long histy of hscol-
laborated
conduct-
ing research into all aspects of aircraft noise. For many years,
with Airbus on a range of noise research and development
projects and the new Airbus Noise Technology Centre, which was for-
mally launched at the university on Nov. 3, consolidates the relationship
between the two organizations -
The Centre's immediate goal is to work towards the target set for the
airline industry by the Advisory Council for Aeronautical Research in Eu-
rope, to cut perceived noise in half by 2020 and eliminate all noise nui-
sance outside airport boundaries. This requires a doubling of the previous
rate of progress, and requires advanced research and development across a
range of new technologies.
University of Southampton Vice -Chancellor, Professor Bill Wakeham,
comments: "We are honoured and delighted that Airbus has chosen
Southampton as its partner to help find novel ways to reduce aircraft
noise. By combining the talents of engineers at Airbus and the University,
we are certain that significant progress can be made in this important
area."
France, adds: "We are confident that
Pierre Lempereur, Airbus
Centre will provide Airbus with enhanced access to technology innovation
and support from world-class skills, experience
de-
velop solutions to cope with the challenging objectives Airbus has set for
aircraft noise impact mitigation." brings together academic
The Centre, led by Professor Xin Zhang,
staff, research fellows and PhD students using state-of-the-art computer
simulations and wind tunnel testing to develop new noise reduction con-
cepts. Undergraduate students will also work with the research team, pro -
for
viding exciting projects to stimulate the next generation of engineers
industry.
More information about the Centre can be found at:
http://www.soton.ac.uk/ses/research/antc/index.html.
AMORT NOISE REPORT
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest
Ct., b orhio sereport.oPhone:
Price -4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
$850
e-mail: edr @ a lrp
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal tthhat the base fee of US$103 per page 11 use of per OPY�ents,
is granted by Aviation Emissions e, Or the inter a' or Personal
Report, provided
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.
157
,!';,� ,.3i'„ k"iw• � �P a �� .� `��ney .� �i,P.�3� �a 'Els,+/ ham. �dt., ..r �^r.., F � �=
Ea
A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments
Volume 20, Number 39 November 28, 2008
Piedmont Triad Intl
In This Issue...
FAA OK'S PART 150 PROGRAM DEVELOPED
TO MITIGATE NOISE FROM NEW FEDEX HUB
On Nov. 21, the Federal Aviation Administration announced its approval of the
Piedmont Triad Intl ...
Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program for Piedmont Triad International Airport in
FAA. approves Part 150 pro -
Greensboro, NC, which was developed to address anticipated noise impact from a new
gram developed to reduce
FedEx regional cargo hub that is planned to open there in 2009.
noise impact of new FedEx
The FAA approved all 20 measures proposed in the program, including a number
regional hub due to open
of nighttime flight procedures and preferential runway use to mitigate noise impact
there in 2009 - p. 157
(approved only as voluntary measures), purchase of homes within the 70 dB DNL
contour, sound insulation for homes between the 65 and 70 dB DNL contours, and in-
Runways ... Three new ran-
stallation of a noise and operations monitoring system.
_ The flight procedures were only approved as voluntary measures because that is
ways open on the same day
how the FAA is approving them at this time, explained noise consultant Andrew Har-
at Washington Dulles Int'l,
ris of Andrew S. Harris, Inc., who prepared the study. He said that funding for pro-
Chicago O'Hare Int'l, and
grams such as sound insulation will require the airport to make a formal specific
Seattle -Tacoma Int'l. But
j request to the FAA, which will be considered by the agency when made.
communities under the new
Two Part 150 program measures were approved subject to FAA review of specific
O'Hare runway are already
(Continued on p. 158)
filing complaints (more in
Runways
next issue) - p. 157
THREE NEW RUNWAYS OPEN ON SAME DAY
MSP In0 ... FAA honors
AT DULLES, O'IIARE, SEA -TAC INT'L AIRPORTS
airport authority for "extraor-
Three new runways opened on the same day, Nov. 20, at Washington Dulles Inter-
dinary measures" it took to
inform public about noise
national, Chicago O'Hare International, and Seattle -Tacoma International providing
impact of new runway and
additional capacity at some of the nation's busiest airports.
"These new runways are testimony to the power of perseverance, the wisdom of
how it will be used - p. 158
foresight, and the audacity of action," Transportation Secretary Mary Peters said dur-
ing a day in which she hopped across the country to attend all three runway openings.
NextGen ... FAA gives
Peters said that the three new runways — estimated to cost over $2 billion includ-
green light to nationwide Be-
ing $676 in federal Airport Improvement Program funds — would allow for an addi-
to ent of ADS -B system
p y
tionai 330,000 take -offs and landings each year and would held reduce delays.
The new $356 million runway at Dulles International Airport (1L/19R) is the first
by 2013 - p. 159
built there since the airport opened in 1962 and is the third north -south parallel run-
way. It brings the number of runways at Dulles to four with a fifth cross -wind runway
News Briefs ... HMMH part
approved but not yet funded.
of team to manage Midway
The new fourth runway is approximately 9,400 feet long and 150 feet wide. It is
FAA updates Part 150 data
the most western of the three north -south parallel runways at Dulles, about a mile
Connecticut vows to con -
west of what is now the center north -south parallel runway.
The new runway is expected to provide the potential for approximately 100,000
tinue legal battle over air-
space redesign - p. 160
} (Continued on p. 159)
Airport Noise Report
November 28, 2008
Triad Intl, from p. 157
applications. These measures involve possible noise barriers
at future airport facilities and optional measures (such as avi-
gation easements) for homeowners located between 65 and
70 DNL contour who are not participating in the sound insu-
lation program. FAA approval of actions under these meas-
ures would be required if FAA funding would be sought.
To reduce noise impact from the FedEx hub, the FAA
plans to use head-to-head operations to the southwest of the
airport, under which nighttime cargo flights will approach
and depart in that direction to avoid more densely -populated
areas, especially neighborhoods to the northeast, which are
closest to the airport.
"The nighttime preferential runway use program is the
measure for implementation of head-to-head runway use, a
central element of noise abatement and a key to efficient op-
eration of the regional hub for FedEx," Harris told ANR.
The runway use program, he said, will be administered
by the Piedmont Triad Airport Authority (PTAA) proprietor
of the airport. FedEx and other carriers serving the airport -
participated in development of the NCP and it is contem-
plated that the carriers will comply with the measures, Harris
said,
The PTAA will begin to implement the NCP measures
beginning in December 2008.
Approved on a voluntary basis only are the following
nighttime operational measures:
• Preferred nighttime runway use;
• Night runway use assignments;
• Night southbound departure corridor from Runway
23L;
• Night Departure Procedure from Runway 23R;
• Night northbound departure corridor from Runway
23L;
• Departures from Runway 5L and 5R;
• Noise abatement departure profiles;
• Noise abatement approach procedures; and
• Altitude for downwind legs.
Additional measures in the Part 150 program given out-
right approval by FAA were:
• Restrictions on the use of Auxiliary Power Units
(APUs);
• Pursue compatible use zoning where DNL exceeds 65
dB;
• Establish a noise monitoring function at the airport;
• Publish DNL contours for DNL 60 and above; and
• Install and operate an Aircraft Noise and Operations
Monitoring System.
For further information on the Part 150 program for Pied-
mont Triad International, contact Dana Perkins in FAA's At-
lanta Airports District Office; tel: (404) 305-7152.
FAA's Record of Approval for the Part 150 program will
be available on-line at: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraf-
fic/airports/environmental/airportnoise/part 150/states/.
158
MSP int11
1 '', �.
The Federal Aviation Administration has honored the
Minneapolis -St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission
(MAC) for the extraordinary measures it took to inform the
public and aviation stakeholders of the way a new fourth run-
way at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport would be
used and the noise impact it would have.
FAA Division Manager Jeri Alles presented MAC Noise
Manager Chad Leqve with an Outstanding Award for Com-
munity and Public Outreach, citing "extraordinary measures"
by the MAC "to communicate effectively with the full range
of stakeholders regarding the runway utilization and noise
impacts of Runway 17/35, which opened in October 2005.
The new runway was the capstone of the $3 billion MSP
Building a Better Airport expansion program.
The MAC was nominated for the award by the FAA's
District office in Minneapolis.
"With input from community, airline and FAA representa-
tives serving on MSP's Noise Oversight Committee, the
MAC developed an extensive communication program to in-
form residents of expected changes in noise patterns once the
new runway opened," MAC explained in a Nov. 24 state-
ment.
The communication effort included:
• 48 community open houses, city council meetings,
county gatherings, public input forums, and other informa-
tional assemblies;
• Conferences with seven realtor groups in the south
metro area;
• Outreach to hotel, extended stay, elder care, school, and
health care facilities;
• An eight -minute Runway 17/35 informational video;
• Interaction with local government officials;
• Print and electronic newsletter distribution;
• Detailed information on the Noise Program web site
(www.macnoise.com);
• An informational brochure;
• Paid advertising and notices;
• News media communications;
• The MAC's noise complaint and information hotline;
• Discussions with officials from the Minnesota Zoo.
In the FAA's letter notifying the MAC that it has won the
award, Alles noted that the MAC's efforts went beyond the
challenge of communicating anticipated noise impacts from
the new runway.
"MAC also worked with the FAA, airlines, communities,
and residents to develop and refine arrival and departure pro-
cedures that were consistent with the runway use numbers
published in the environmental documents that preceded con-
struction of the new runway. The new procedures provided
noise relief by sending more aircraft over less populated resi-
dential areas and commercial/industrial areas," Alles wrote.
Airport Noise Report
C
November 28, 2008
Runways, from p. 157
additional annual operations and decrease average delay per
operations by 2.5 minutes.
DOT said the Metropolitan Washington Airports Author-
ity, proprietor of Dulles, did not need to buy a single parcel
of land for noise compatibility to construct the new runway
because the surrounding counties implemented land use con-
trol limiting nearby development to compatible uses.
The $455 million 7,500 foot runway at O'Hare is the first
built there since 1971 and will be used mainly as a bad
weather arrival runway.
It is part of Chicago's ambitious $15 billion O'Hare
Modernization Program which is facing growing financial
problems and airline opposition in light of the economic
downturn. The airlines serving O'Hare reportedly told
Chicago that they want the city to halt the next phase of the
expansion project, calling it "premature and inappropriate"
in light of the decline in air travel.
The FAA said it has provided O'Hare with more than
$157.5 million in AIP funding for one of the most compre-
hensive noise mitigation programs anywhere in the world,
including residential and school sound insulation and com-
patible land use planning.
The new 8,500 -foot runway at Sea -Tac is the airport's
third and will allow simultaneous landings in poor weather.
It was the most expensive of the three new runways to build
at a cost approximately $1.1 billon, including about $301
million in AIP funds. That is because of the daunting engi-
neering challenges faced in moving massive amounts of
earth and relocating a stream required to build the runway.
The new Sea -Tac runway, delayed by lawsuits, took 16
years to build and is expected to reduce delays by up to 80
percent and to save over 5 million gallons of fuel per year for
the airlines and over 50,000 tons of greenhouse gas emis-
sions.
The FAA provided over $236 million for noise mitigation
over the years to help the Port of Seattle purchase 1,400
properties and to insulate more than 9,300 homes and seven
schools near the airport. The Port of Seattle also purchased
and removed more than 500 properties near the new runway,
including 400 single-family homes, apartments, and com-
mercial buildings.
NextGen
FAA GIVES GREEN LIGHT
TO DEPLOY ADS -B SYSTEM
In a step expected to greatly improve efficiency in the air
traffic system, Acting Federal Aviation Administrator Robert
A. Sturgell Nov. 24 gave the green light to nationwide de-
ployment of a system that allows aircraft to be tracked by
satellite rather than radar.
Automatic Dependent Surveillance–Broadcast (ADS -B)
will reduce the risk of midair collisions and weather-related
accidents, provide more efficient routes in adverse weather,
159
improve situational awareness for pilots, and provide envi-
ronmental benefits through operational meautes such as noise
abatement routing.
"The next generation of air travel has arrived," Sturgell
said. "ADS -B is the backbone of the future of air traffic con-
trol. NextGen is real and, as of today, NextGen is now. Presi-
dent Bush just last week stated that modernizing our aviation
system is an urgent challenge, and today's announcement
demonstrates that the Department of Transportation and the
FAA are taking concrete steps to do just that."
An executive order signed by President Bush on Nov. 18
accelerated the implementation of NextGen, stating that it is
the policy of the United States to establish and maintain an
air transport system that meets the present and future needs
of this country.
Sturgell's commissioning of essential services for ADS -B
in Florida clears the way for nationwide deployment of the
system by 2013, FAA said. The installation of 11 ground sta-
tions in Florida gives pilots viewing ADS -B cockpit displays
the same live traffic seen by controllers. Pilots also receive
free, real-time weather updates from the National Weather
Service, as well as critical flight information such as tempo-
rary flight restrictions and special -use airspace. "These ad-
vances, in turn, will allow the United States to accommodate
the increasing number of aircraft in the nation's skies, and
will help to make the travel experience for airline passengers
more efficient, safer and environmentally friendly," FAA ex-
plained.
"The commissioning marks a significant milestone in the
FAA's aggressive deployment schedule for ADS -B. By 2013,
794 ground stations will provide ADS -B services everywhere
there is radar coverage today — with fiuther coverage in
places that currently lack radar coverage, including the Gulf
of Mexico and Alaska," the agency said.
Work at the sites of the next key milestones for ADS -B
services — Juneau, AK, Louisville, KY, the Gulf of Mexico
and Philadelphia — are scheduled for completion by the end
of 2010. This will allow controllers to begin using ADS -13 for
aircraft surveillance or separation services.
In Brief...
HMMH on Team To Operate Midway
The City of Chicago selected the Midway Investment and
Development Corporation to operate Midway Airport under a
99 -year lease. The acoustical consulting firm HMMH Inc.
said that it is pleased to be part of the Corporation team.
HNMi said it assisted MidCo with an evaluation of cur-
rent and potential noise issues at Midway and provided guid-
ance on potential changes to federal noise policy. "We are
most excited to be part of a new business model for operating
airports in the U.S.," said HMMH President Mary Ellen
Eagan.
Airport Noise Report
November 28, 2008
John J. Corbett, Esq.
Spiegel & McDiarmid
Washington, DC
Carl E. Burleson
Director, Office of Environment and Energy
Federal Aviation Administration
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance
Carlsbad, CA
Peter J. Kirsch, Esq.
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
Denver
Vincent E. Mestre, P.E.
President, Mestre Greve Associates
Laguna Niguel, CA
Steven F. Pflaum, Esq.
McDermott, Will & Emery
Chicago
Mary L. Vigilante
President, Synergy Consultants
Seattle
FAA Updates Part 150 Project Data
On Nov. 17, the FAA updated statistics on its Part 150 Airport Noise
Compatability Program.
The agency said:
• 273 airports are now participating in the program;
• 254 airports have used Airport Improvement Program grants to fund
Part 150 studies;
- 240 airports have approved Noise Compatibility Programs (first-
time); and
• 101 airports have revised or amended their Part 150 programs.
FAA also reported that a total of $92.9 million in AIP funds and $11.9
million in Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs) has been used by airports to
prepare Part 150 studies.
To implement Part 150 programs since the program began in 1982,
airports have used $5.1 billion in AIP grants and $3.1 billion in PFC
charges.
Airports that began Part 150 programs in fiscal 2008 are Kissimmee
Gateway and New Smyrna Beach Municipal Airport, both in Florida.
Airport that received funding for Part 150 Program updates in fiscal
2008 are Cleveland Hopkins International, Gainesville Regional, Kahului
Airport, Ohio State University Airport, Philadelphia International, San
Diego International, and Tucson International.
Connecticut Will Continue Airspace Battle with FAA
Corrntecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said Nov. 24 that
the state will contine its legal battle with the Federal Aviation Administra-
tion over the redesign of airspace in the New York/New Jersey/Philadel-
phia area despite the turndown in the economy.
His vow to continue the litigation comes a day after some members of
a coalition of 13 towns, mostly in Connecticut, said they do not want to
ask taxpayers to fund the lawsuit in such a bad economy. The alliance of
towns bad committed to more than $1 million to fund the litigation but
are now looking for donations from individuals.
Blumenthal said he will take the state's lawsuit challenging the air-
space redesign plan to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary. "We have
made very clear that the state is committed to fight the battle as long as it
is necessary and no matter who is in it or who is out of it," he said.
A dozen lawsuits, some by Pennsylvania counties near Philadelphia
International Airport, have challenged the airspace redesign. The cases
have been consolidated before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit. The State of New Jersey also filed an amicus brief in
the case supporting the litigation against the FAA.
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
e-mail: editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price $850.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients,
is granted by Aviation Emissions Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.
161
c� ��, �+ y..�as^ �� a SJ�r '7n � � � �. • 4w,,,.{ titre^` .�Ar �a'i. n �,� x� ' C
A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments
Volume 20, Number 40 December 5, 2008
Runways
NOISE COMPLAINTS SPIKE FOLLOWING
OPENING OF NEW O'HARE, SEA -TAC RUNWAYS
"We're getting killed," Park Ridge, IL, Mayor Howard Frimark told a local re-
porter four days after the Nov. 20 opening of a new runway at Chicago O'Hare In-
ternational .Airport that directs aircraft on a new flight path over the central and
southern parts of the town.
Most residents of Park Ridge were aware that the new runway was opening, he
said, but were unaware of the degree of degradation to the quality of their lives it
would cause.
"I am concerned over the amount of traffic this new runway is taking, and the
fact that it was intended for smaller regional aircraft and not larger, noisier planes
such as the Boeing 727 and Airbus A320. The noise is relentless for 16 hours a day
in the south of Park Ridge, and our residents in [several] wards do not qualify for
soundproofing according to Federal Aviation Administration standards," the mayor
told The Journal & Topics Newspaper.
( ) Frimark said that City Hall had received constant calls registering noise com-
plaints since the runway opened and was directing people to the O'Hare Noise
(Continued on p. 162)
Research
M1W I I kyj 1 VA DIN 01 DI '• 111A K U •` A ,'i DO 011
On Nov. 25, the Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) announced
that it is seeking a contractor to develop a methodology for optimizing aircraft de-
parture procedures in terms of emissions, fuel burn, capacity, and community noise
exposure and to conduct case studies to demonstrate that the methodology works.
The $300,000 18 -month project, set to begin in May 2009, will consider
whether noise abatement departure procedures can be `optimized" or eliminated,
allowing aircraft to take more direct routes out of airports, thus reducing fuel and
emissions.
"Many airports recommend that aircraft operators use noise abatement depar-
ture procedures (NADP) to reduce the impact of noise on their neighboring com-
munities. While minimizing noise impacts, these procedures may result in other
adverse environmental and operational effects, including increased fuel burn, in-
creased emissions, and reduced airport capacity," the ACRP announcement ex-
plained.
"With the potential for near-term introduction of significantly quieter aircraft,
research is needed on how to optimize or potentially eliminate NADPs without
generating adverse noise impacts. In addition, a change from NADPs to more di-
( ) (Continued on p. 162)
Airport Noise Report
In Th'tS Issue...
New Runways ... Noise
complaints spike following
opening of new runways at
Chicago O'Hare and Sea -Tac
on Nov. 20. Some airport
neighbors complain that run-
ways are not being operated
as they expected - p. 161.
Research... Noise abatement
departure procedures will
come under scrutiny in a new
ACRD project that will de-
velop a methodology to opti-
mize departure procedures
for noise, emissions, fuel
burn, and capacity - p. 161
Land Use ... Community
near O'Hare Int'l receives
$320,000 grant from FAA to
prepare land use compatibil-
ity plans - p. 163
Part 150 Program ... Draft
update of FAA guidance on
Part 150 program will be is-
sued soon for review by
trade groups - p. 163
Conferences ... Noise ses-
sions on agenda for upcom-
ing Florida Airports Council
Noise and Environment Con-
ference in January - p. 164
December 5. 2008
Runways, from p. 161
Compatibility Commission's hot line. ONCC Director Brian
Gilligan told ANR Dec. 4 that there was not yet a count of
the number of noise complaints that had been logged onto the
hotline since the new runway opened.
But officials of Park Ridge and other communities in the
noise shadow of the new O'Hare runway are likely to de-
mand such information at a Dec. 5 meeting of the ONCC
during which Park Ridge's concerns will be discussed. Rep-
resentatives of the Federal Aviation Administration and the
City of Chicago Department of Transportation will attend
that regularly schedule meeting of the Commission.
Mayor Frimark said he will demand at that meeting that
the ONCC and the City of Chicago lessen the noise impact
from the new runway, the first added at O'Hare in 37 years.
"The shift in traffic from the commissioning of the new
runway is having a dramatic effect on the quality of life for
the citizens of Park Ridge," Mayor Frimark told paper.
Frimark said that, as of Nov. 25, he had already received
450 noise complaints about the new runway and said.that
Chicago had received three times that number. ANR at-
tempted to confirm these numbers with the mayor but he was
unavailable.
At a Nov. 25 meeting of the ONCC Technical Committee,
Frimark demanded that the Federal Aviation Administration
and the City of Chicago provide concrete evidence showing
that the FAA's 65 dB DNL threshold for compatible residen-
tial use near airports is accurate.
ONCC has placed five noise monitors in Park Ridge to
determine the actual noise impact. Gilligan told ANR that the
ONCC will be looking at noise impact both in terms of DNL
and single event noise measurements in analyzing the situa-
tion in Park Ridge.
Complaints Also at Sea -Tac
While the new runway opening at O'Hare appears to have
sparked a large number of noise complaints, communities
around Sea -Tac filed fewer complaints in the week after the
new runway opened there but it was still an increase, accord-
ing to Stan Shepherd, manager of Airport Noise Programs for
Sea -Tac.
"We definitely had an increase in complaints associated
with the opening of the new runway," be told ANR. Typically
around 30 noise complaints are filed in a week but 135 noise
complaints were filed the week after the new runway opened.
"Since then, the complaints have been coming in on a regular
basis at about 15 to 20 per day," he said.
Asked to describe the complaints, Shepherd said, "Most
of the complaints are coming from people near the new flight
pattern both north and south of the airport. The majority
seem to be within the close proximity to the airport within the
65 DNL.
"We are hearing a lot of complaints saying they did not
think it would be so loud, and that they thought the new run-
way would only be used during low visibility conditions to
162
increase arrival capacity. The primary reason for building the
runway was to increase capacity during poor weather condi-
tions, but with the understanding that it was to be used to in-
crease airfield efficiency at any time.
Some in the community seem to be surprised that we are
using it every day even when it's clear weather outside. A
small amount of people said they had heard it would be used
only for small propeller aircraft, not large jets. We also have
a lot of people asking us to expand our sound insulation
boundaries now that the new runway is operational (we al-
ready expanded the boundaries many years ago and sound in-
sulated 87 additional homes and acquired another 59 in the
approach transition zone in preparation for opening the
newrunway)
"To try and get the word out prior to opening the new
runway, we held a community open house to discuss its use
and had an attendance of nearly 200 people."
No Complaints at Dulles
The opening of the new runway at Dulles appears to have
gone virtually unnoticed by the communities near that air-
port. But that may be because, on average, only 22 takeoffs
and landings are being conducted on the runway each day.
Only six noise complaints have been filed over noise at
Dulles in the past two weeks and they did not focus on the
new runway, said Neal Phillips, noise office for the Metro-
politan Washington Airports Authority.
Regarding the complaints at O'Hare and Sea -Tac,
Phillips said people were not misled regarding how those
new runways would be used. Environmental Impact State-
ments and runway scenarios are very involved analyses, he
said. They can state that a runway will operate in a certain
way most of the time but, invariably, when the runway opens,
it operates differently in some way. People do not focus on
the lesser aspects of how a runway will be operated, he said.
Runways, from p. 161
rect routing can increase capacity at the airports through
more efficient use of facilities and airspace. Changing to
more direct routing has the potential to decrease aircraft fuel
consumption; and, given an increasing focus on climate
change, decreasing fuel consumption can be important.
"Efforts to reduce fuel consumption can broadly fit in
two categories: aircraft/engine design improvements and air
traffic optimization. With respect to optimization of air traf-
fic, effort to date has primarily focused on the enroute flight
phase. In contrast, research is needed that focuses on depar-
ture procedures that affect airports and airport communities
more directly. For air traffic optimization, the focus of
FAA's "Next Generation Air Transportation System"
(NextGen) has been on reducing flight time. Reduced flight
times generally translate into aircraft engines burning less
fuel and emitting fewer pollutants; however, for short -haul
flights, fuel consumed enroute can be less than 50% of the
total fuel burn. Arrivals and departures have received less at -
Airport Noise Report
December 5, 2008
tention despite the possibility that changes might achieve
fuel savings during take -off and climb to cruise. One exam-
ple of possible improvement to landing applications now re-
ceiving considerable attention is continuous descent arrivals
(CDA). FAA has worked with airports, airlines, and acade-
mia to study the impact of implementing CDAs, which can
simultaneously result in a reduction in fuel burn, emissions,
and noise.
"As quieter aircraft are introduced into service, an oppor-
tunity may arise to optimize departures and achieve a bal-
ance between noise and emissions impacts. In response to
apparently limited efforts to date on environmental optimiza-
tion of aircraft departures, research is needed to provide a
tool to help regulators and airport managers make environ-
mentally optimal decisions," the ACRP announcement said.
ACRD said that the objective of the research project is to
develop a departure optimization methodology to (1) quan-
tify potential reductions in fuel burn and source emissions,
(2) estimate possible increases in air traffic capacity that can
be achieved by optimizing departure procedures while con-
tinuing to address noise exposure for communities around
airports, and (3) account for existing and future fleet mixes
and improvements envisioned under NextGen.
In the context of current noise abatement departure pro-
cedures, ACRP said that this methodology should estimate
environmental and capacity -related benefits associated with
the following localized contributors: (a) source noise reduc-
tion in. future engine/airframe technologies, and (b) realistic
alterations to present noise abatement departure procedures
to help regulators and airport management make environ-
mentally optimal decisions.
"Although novel approaches to compare the impacts of
climate change, degraded air quality, and community noise
are welcome, the output of this research should, at a mini-
mum, provide directly quantifiable metrics," ACRP said.
The Transportation Research Board, which manages the
ACRP program for the Federal Aviation Administration, is-
sued a Request for Proposals for ACRD Project 02-12: Envi-
ronmental Optimization of Aircraft Departures: Fuel Burn,
Emissions, and Noise. The RFP is available on the TRB's
website at:
http://www.trb.org/TRBNet/ProjectDisplay.asp?Projec-
tID=2575/
Land Use Compatibility
O'HARE COMMUNITY GETS
$320,000 FAA LAND USE GRANT
The O'Hare Noise Compatibility Commission announced
Dec. 2 that the Village of Harwood Heights, Ill., has received
a $320,000 grant from the Federal Aviation Administration to
prepare land use compatibility plans related to the village's
proximity to Chicago's O'Hare International Airport.
The village will provide an additional 20 percent of the
grant, or $80,000.
163
Harwood Heights is the second O'Hare Noise Compati-
bility Commission (ONCC) member within the past two
years to be named an FAA Vision 100- Century of Aviation
Reauthorization Act grant recipient. Des Plaines received a
$750,000 FAA grant in 2006.
The purpose of the FAA grant, ONCC explained, is to re-
duce non- compatible land uses and to prevent the introduc-
tion of additional non -compatible land use within the O'Hare
Airport vicinity. Harwood Heights, with a population of
8,300, is located between the airport and the City of Chicago
south of Interstate 90 (Kennedy Expressway).
"As the O'Hare Modernization Program continues to
construct east/west runways and plans to develop a western
entrance, compatible land -use surrounding the airport is an
essential element to the economic engine of the region," said
Arlington Heights Mayor Arlene Mulder, ONCC Chairper-
son. "We encourage other communities to apply for FAA
funding. Applications will be accepted through March 2009
and ONCC will assist cormnunities with the process," she
said.
"When the FAA extended the program, ONCC encour-
aged us to apply and gave us the tools to pursue this grant,"
said Harwood Heights Mayor Margaret "Peggy" Fuller. Har-
wood Heights officials will to use the money to analyze the
compatibility of commercial, industrial and residential land
use patterns with the O'Hare Modernization Program. The
goal is to achieve compatible land uses consistent with Fed-
eral land use criteria, to identify economic opportunities for
village businesses and develop a strategic comprehensive
plan.
"We are interested in avoiding future land use conflicts,
mediating existing conflicts and leveraging opportunities for
economic growth, ensuring future prosperity and a high qual-
ity of life for village residents," Fuller explained Village offi-
cials will work closely with the City of Chicago's
Department of Aviation.
For more information about ONCC or the FAA grant pro-
gram, contact Brian Gilligan, 773-686-3198 or visit
www.oharenoise.org.
Part 150 Program
The final draft of the first comprehensive update of the
Federal Aviation Administration's advisory circular on its
Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program hopefully will
be circulated for outside review by the end of December, ac-
cording to Victoria Catlett, the FAA environmental specialist
who manages the program.
Catlett said the draft AC will be circulated for review
only to aviation trade groups and the National Organization
to Insure a Sound -controlled Environment (NOISE), which
represents officials of political jurisdictions near airports.
Airport Noise Report
December 5, 2008 164
ANR EDITORIAL
The draft AC will not be circulated to the public for review, Catlett
said. ANR had reported incorrectly in the Sept. 12 issue that the AC
ADVISORY BO
BOARD T
would be issued in final form by the end of 2008. That is incorrect. What
will be issued is only the final draft, which would be subject to revision
based on the input received by the FAA from those reviewing the draft.
John J. Corbett, Esq.
It is not yet clear when the final updated advisory circular would be
Spiegel & McDiarmid
issued.
Washington, DC
Although FAA has issued internal updates to its Part 150 AC
150/5020-1 over the years, no comprehensive updated of the guidance
Carl E. Burleson
has been done since it was issued in August 1983 when the Part 150 pro -
Director, Office of Environment and Energy
gram began.
Federal Aviation Administration
The revised AC will not change the FAA's Part 150 regulations but
will provide "how to" guidance on implementing the provisions of the
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
regulations and will recognize new policy and changes in federal law
Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance
since the 1983 publication of the original AC.
Carlsbad, CA
Catlett is tentatively scheduled to discus the updated Part 150 pro-
gram advisory circular at the 1 lth Environmental and Noise Conference
Peter J. Kirsch, Esq.
of the Florida Airports Conference, which will be held on Jan. 14-16,
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
2009, at the Hilton Daytona Beach Resort (see story below).
Denver
Conferences
Vincent E. Mestre, P.E.
President, Mestre Greve Associates
FLORIDA AIRPORTS COUNCIL NOISE,
Laguna Niguel, CA
ENVIRONMENT MEETING AGENDA SET
Steven E Pflaum, Esq.
Several sessions on aviation noise are included on the agenda of the
McDermott, Will & Emery
upcoming l Ith Environmental and Noise Conference, sponsored by the
Chicago
Florida Airports Council, which will be held in Daytona Beach, FL, on
Jan. 14-16, 2009.
Mary L. Vigilante
• Mike Moon, director of Martin County Airport, will discuss a noise
President, Synergy Consultants
abatement profile demonstration project;
Seattle
• Peter Kirsch of the law firm Kaplan Kirsch and Rockwell, will dis-
cuss "Using Airport Design Standards to Justify Shrinking an Airport: Is
it for safety or noise?"
• Richard Null of the Florida Department of Transportation, will pro-
vide an update of an airport compatible land use study;
• Mary Ellen Egan, president of Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc.,
will discuss NextGen and the impact of Continuous Descent Approaches
on airports and their environmental programs; and
• Victoria Catlett of the FAA, will discuss changes to FAA's Part 150
Program Advisory Circular.
In addition to these presentations, a workshop on addressing helicop-
ter noise also will be held.
Further information on the conference is available online at:
http://www.floridaairports.org/meetings/Meetings.asp?id=30.
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 7294867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
e-mail: editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price $850.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients,
is granted by Aviation Emissions Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.
165
6
A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments
Volume 20, Number 41,42 December 12, 2008
PFCs
$2.86 BILLION OF TOTAL PFC REVENUE
DEVOTED TO NOISE MITIGATION PROJECTS
As of Nov. 30, 2008, some $2.86 billion (5 percent) of the $64.9 billion in Pas-
senger Facility Charges (PFCs) that the Federal Aviation Administration has ap-
proved for collection and use since 1992 is being designated for airport noise
mitigation projects, according to data provided by the agency.
The total PFC revenue being earmarked for airport noise mitigation projects in-
creased by $58 million in fiscal 2008 and the first three months of fiscal 2009 com-
pared to fiscal 2007 (19 ANR 148).
The FAA subdivides noise mitigation projects into six categories. Following is
the total amount airports plan to collect for each category, as of Nov. 30, 2008, as
well as the percentage that category represents of the total PFCs for noise mitiga-
tion being collected:
• $1.31 billion (45.9 percent) for multi -phase projects;
• $1.03 billion (36.1 percent) for soundproofing projects;
• $466.4 million (16.3 percent) to purchase land;
$15.7 million (0.5 percent) for noise monitoring systems:
• $15.7 million (0.5 percent) for planning; and
• $15.6 million (0.5 percent) for miscellaneous projects.
95 Airports Using PFCs for Noise Mitigation
A total of 95 airports were using PFCs for noise mitigation projects as of Nov.
30, 2008. Four new aiports began imposing PFCs for noise mitigation projects in
fiscal 2008 and the first three months of fiscal 2009: Birmingham (AL) Interna-
tional .Airport; Williams Gateway Airport in Mesa, AZ; Carlsbad (CA) Airport, and
Modesto (CA) City -County Airport.
The top 15 airports targeting PFC revenue for noise mitigation projects as of
Nov. 30, 2008, are: Los Angeles International continues to lead at $788.4 million;
Chicago O'Hare International ($411 million); Minneapolis -St. Paul International
($212.1 million); Phoenix Sky Harbor International ($195.2 million); Chicago Mid-
way ($129 million); San Jose International ($121.8 million); Seattle -Tacoma Inter-
national ($115.6 million); Bob Hope Airport ($94.8 million); Ontario International
($84.7 million); Cleveland Hopkins International ($78.4 million); Louisville Inter-
national ($58.9 million); Charlotte -Douglas International ($58.7 million); Las
Vegas International ($51.7 million); Detroit Metropolitan International ($49.4 mil-
lion); and Lambert -St. Louis International ($49 million).
PFCs are only one source of revenue that airports use to fund noise mitigation
projects. The other funding stream is the FAA's Airport Improvement Program.
Data on AIP grants for noise mitigation projects were reported earlier (20 ANR
129).
Those data show that, in fiscal 2008, some 48 airports received a total of $272.7
million in federal AIP grants for noise mitigation projects.
Airport Noise Report
In This Issue...
PFCs ... This special issue
of ANR provides data ob-
tained from the FAA on air-
ports that are collecting
Passenger Facility Charges
(PFCs) to support various
noise mitigation projects.
The data show that 95 air-
ports, four more than in fis-
cal 2007, are now imposing
PFCs to reduce noise impact.
Approximately $2.86 bil-
lion in PFCs was being im-
posed by airports for noise
mitigation projects as of
Nov. 30, 2008, up $58.07
million from the end of fiscal
2007.
Los Angeles International
remains far ahead of other
airports in using PFCs for
noise mitigation projects
($788.4 million), followed
by Chicago O'Hare Interna-
tional ($411 million).
Table 1, showing a break-
down of all airport projects
being supported by PFCs,
begins on p. 166.
Table 2, showing PFCs
being collected by project
type, begins on p. 167.
Table 3, showing PFCs
being collected by individual
airports, begins on p. 173.
December 12, 2008
APPROVED PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES BY CATEGORIES
as of November 30, 2008
CATEGORY PROJECT TYPE
166
AMOUNT PERCENT
AIRSIDE(19% w/o DIA)(18% w DIA)
$ 466,413,563
16.3
RUNWAYS
$ 4,772,071,884
41.4
TAXIWAYS
$ 2,034,705,776
17.6
APRONS
$1,442,268,769
12.5
LAND
$ 468,342,079
4.1
EQUIPMENT
$ 1,069,921,072
9.3
PLANNING
$ 354,003,792
3.1
LIGHTING
$ 270,720,473
2.3
OTHER
$ 1,118,504,040
9 7
TOTAL
$11,530,537,885
100
LANDSIDE(38% w/o DIA)(36% w DIA)
TERMINAL $20,251,067,841 86.8
LAND $ 1,221,295,891 5.2
SECURITY $ 1,847,608,756 7.9
TOTAL $23,319,972,488 100
NOISE(5% w/o DIA)(4% w DIA)
LAND
$ 466,413,563
16.3
MULTI -PHASE
$1,316,916,763
45.9
SOUNDPROOFING
$1,036,312,984
36.1
MONITORING
$ 15,725,327
0.5
PLANNING
$ 15,701,321
0.5
OTHER
$ 15,642,331
0.5
TOTAL
$ 2,866,712,289
100
ACCESS(7% w/o DIA)(6% w DIA)
ROADS
$ 1,933,534,608
48.0
RAIL
$ 2,014,496,678
50.0
LAND
$ 11,699,727
0.3
PLANNING
$ 71,260,162
1.8
TOTAL
$ 4,030,991,175
100
INTEREST(32%)(31 % w/DIA)
PRCYCOW31
$20,035,535,680 100
$61,783,749,517
DENVER (5%) $ 3,137,099,200
PFC TOTAL $64,920,848,717
SOURCE: FAA (PFC BRANCH)
Airport Noise Report
December 12, 2008 167
PFC FUNDED NOISE PROJECTS (BY WORK CODE)
(as of
11/30/08)
CITY
STATE
PROJECT
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE PROJ. TOTAL
Birmingham
9
AL
Land
3173 639
4.50
7/2/08
7/2108$466,413,563
Huntsville
AL
Land
$6,796,960
$3.00
316/92
6/28/94
Huntsville
AL
Land
$920,000
$3.00
3/6/92
11/22/95
Huntsville
AL
Land
$240,000
$3.00
3/6/92
5/28/97
Huntsville
AL
Land
$68,954
$3.00
10/19/98
10/19/98
Huntsville
AL
Land
$154,239.
$4.50
10/30/02
10/30/02
Mobile
AL
Land
$440,431
$3.00
2/22/02
2122/02
Juneau
AK
Land
$21,931
$4.50
5/30/01
5/30/01
Phoenix
AZ
Land
$22,000,000
$3.00
6/5/02
6/5/02
Tucson
AZ
Land
$3,288,473
$4.50
11/19/97
11/19/97
Tucson
AZ
Land
$396,888
$4.50
11/19/97
11/19/97
Fort Smith
AR
Land
$90,756
$3.00
5/8/94
7/24/97
Little Rock
AR
Land
$3,314,737
$4.50
1/31/06
1/31/06
Burbank
CA
Land
$27,829,178
$3.00
6/17/94
2/5197
Fort Lauderdale
FL
Land
$3,500,000
$3.00
4/30/98
4/23/01
Gainesville
FL
Land
$144,869
$4.50
8/29/02
8/29/02
Pensacola
FL
Land
$597,708
$3.00
11/23/92
11/23/92
Pensacola
FL
Land
$69,480
$3.00
11/23/92
8/10/95
Sarasota
FL
Land
$5,400,000
$3.00
6/29/92
12/15/95
Tallahassee
FL
Land
$3,128,225
$3.00
3/3/98
3/3/98
West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$1,000,000
$3.00
1/26/94
8/29/96
West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$2,302,300
$3.00
1/26/94
8/29/96
j West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$374,616
$3.00
1/26/94
6/11/97
West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$1,387,548
$3.00
1/26/94
6111/97
West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$5,000,000
$3.00
1/26/94
6/11/97
West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$2,000,000
$3.00
8/22/00
12/13/02
Atlanta
GA
Land
$7,280,374
$4.50
11/29/07
11/29/07
Bloomington
IL
Land
$35,000
$3.00
12/5/97
12/5197
Moline
IL
Land
$335,915
$4.50
9/29/94
9/29/94
Moline
IL
Land
$365,084
$4.50
3/12/98
3/12/98
Peoria
IL
Land
$382,426
$3.00
918/94
9/8/94
Peoria
IL
Land
$145,441
$4.50
2/3/00
2/3/00
Springfield
IL
Land
$24,740
$3.00
3/27/92
4/28/93
Springfield
IL
Land
$12,275
$3.00
3/27/92
4/28/93
Springfield
IL
Land
$24,897
$3.00
3/27/92
4/28/93
Springfield
IL
Land
$14,721
$3.00
3/27/92
4/28/93
Springfield
IL
Land
$551
$3.00
3/27/92
4/28/93
Springfield
IL
Land
$88,167
$3.00
11/24/93
3/11/97
Indianapolis
IN
Land
$42,532,859
$3.00
6/28/93
6/28/93
Louisville
KY
Land
$58,800,000
$3.00
1/29/97
1/29/97
Minneapolis
MN
Land
$21,500,000
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Land
$20,500,000
$4.50
5/5/05
5/5/05
Kansas City
MO
Land
$11,180,610
$3.00
12/21/95
12/21/95
St. Louis
MO
Land
$23,016,867
$3.00
9/30/92
9/30/92
St. Louis
MO
Land
$25,683,623
$3.00
1/31/96
1/8/98
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$10,654,182
$4.50
2/24/92
3/15/95
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$7,991,645
$4.50
2124/92
2/24/92
Airport Noise
Report
December 12, 2008
168
CITY
STATE
PROJECT
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE PROJ. TOTAL
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$5,250,000
$3.00
2/24/92
6/7/93
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$26,250,000
$4.50
2/24/92
617/93
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$1,440,492
$4.50
2/24/92
617193
Charlotte
NC
Land
$52,270,000
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
Akron
OH
Land
$19,210
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Land
$14,635
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Land
$5,293
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Land
$21,334
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Land
$12,911
$4.50
4/4/02
4/4/02
Cleveland
OH
Land
$7,137,600
$3.00
9/1/92
2/2/94
Cleveland
OH
Land
$29,685,000
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
Columbus
OH
Land
$119,600
$3.00
7114/92
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Land
$379,070
$3.00
7/14/92
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Land
$519,723
$3.00
7/14/92
3/27/96
Dayton
OH
Land
$309,206
$4.50
7/25/94
7/25194
Allentown
PA
Land
$244,387
$4.50
3/26/01
3/26101
Allentown
PA
Land
$220,475
$4.50
3/26/01
3/26/01
Allentown
PA
Land
$91,944
$4.50
6/6/03
6/6/03
Erie
PA
Land
$242,373
$4.50
5/13/03
5/13/03
Providence
RI
Land
$10,382,213
$4.50
11/27/00
11/27/00
Chattanooga
TN
Land
$100,000
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
Chattanooga
TN
Land
$15,000
$4.50
11/22/00
11/22/00
Harlingen
TX
Land
$96,630
$3.00
7/9/98
7/9/98
Salt Lake City
UT
Land
$465,488
$3.00
10/1/94
10/1194
Salt Lake City
UT
Land
$331,072
$4.50
4/30/01
4130101
Salt Lake City
UT
Land
$524,408
$4.50
2/28/02
2/28/02 \
Lynchburg
VA
Land
$17,762
$3.00
4/14/95
4/14/95
Roanoke
VA
Land
$65,000
$4.50
11/24/04
11/24/04
Bellingham
WA
Land
$166,000
$3.00
4/29193
4/29/93
Bellingham
WA
Land
$732,000
$3.00
10/5/94
10/5/94
Bellingham
WA
Land
$454,350
$3.00
12/11/96
12/11/96
Appleton
WI
Land
$14,502
$3.00
4/25/94
4/25/94
Milwaukee
WI
Land
$3,099,197
$3.00
2/24/95
2/24/95
Milwaukee
WI
Land
$1,425,187
$3.00
2/24/95
2/24/95
Cheyenne
WY
Land
$81,192
$4.50
3/28/01
3/28/01
Carlsbad
CA
Misc
$18,226
$4.50
11/24/08
11/24/08 $15,642,331
Pensacola
FL
Misc
$65,076
$3.00
11/23/92
8/10/95
Tampa
FL
Misc
$1,692,110
$4.50
5/16/03
5/16/03
Chicago
IL
Misc
$11,493
$3.00
6/28193
6/28/93
Chicago
IL
Misc
$297,707
$3.00
6/28/93
6/28/93
Chicago
IL
Misc
$2,057,107
$3.00
2/22/00
2/22/00
Chicago
IL
Misc
$2,500,000
$3.00
4/18102
4/18/02
Chicago
IL
Misc
$42,389
$3.00
6/28193
6/28/93
Chicago
IL
Misc
$2,993,028
$4.50
6128/96
6/28/96
Indianapolis
IN
Misc
$498,684
$4.50
12/20/96
12/20/96
Detroit
MI
Misc
$225,000
$3.00
9/21192
9/21/92
Columbus
OH
Misc
$61,752
$3.00
7/19/93
3/27/96
Milwaukee
WI
Misc
$50,000
$3.00
3/8/01
3/8/01
Milwaukee WI Misc $5,000,000 $3.00 7/9/02 7/9/02
Airport Noise Report \
December 12, 2008
CITY
STATE
PROJECT
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE PROJ. TOTAL
Cheyenne
WY
Mise
$129,759
$4.50
3/28/01
3/28101
Fort Smith
AR
Monitoring
$20,555
$3.00
5/8/94
7/24197 $15,725,327
Burbank
CA
Monitoring
$64,836
$3.00
4/2/01
4/2/01
Los Angeles
CA
Monitoring
$3,450,000
$3.00
9/23/05
9/23/05
Oakland
CA
Monitoring
$345,000
$3.00
6/26/92
6/26/92
Sacramento
CA
Monitoring
$662,000
$3.00
4/26/96
4126/96
San Diego
CA
Monitoring
$1,224,000
$3.00
5/20/03
5/20/03
San Jose
CA
Monitoring
$184,000
$3.00
6/11/92
6/11/92
San Jose
CA
Monitoring
$100,000
$3.00
11/24/99
11/24/99
San Jose
CA
Monitoring
$221,000
$3.00
12/15/00.
12/15/00
Fort Lauderdale
FL
Monitoring
$658,000
$3.00
11/1/94
4/30/98
Chicago
IL
Monitoring
$325,000
$3.00
6/28/93
6/28/93
Chicago
IL
Monitoring
$3,900,000
$3.00
6/28/93
9116/94
Chicago
IL
Monitoring
$1,000,000
$3.00
8/17/06
8/17/06
Covington
KY
Monitoring
$140,000
$3.00
3/30/94
3/30/94
Covington
KY
Monitoring
$387,000
$3.00
7/26/02
7/26/02
Louisville
KY
Monitoring
$125,000
$3.00
3/27/01
3/27/01
Minneapolis
MN
Monitoring
$230,273
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13194
St. Louis
MO
Monitoring
$100,000
$3.00
11/24/08
11/24/08
Columbus
OH
Monitoring
$16,509
$3.00
7/14/92
10/27/93
Portland
OR
Monitoring
$715,750
$3.00
12/7/05
1217/05
Allentown
PA
Monitoring
$30,556
$4.50
3/26/01
3/26/01
Nashville
TN
Monitoring
$200,000
$3.00
5/10/07
5/10/07
Dallas
TX
Monitoring
$1,266,151
$3.00
11/7196
11!1/96
San Antonio
TX
Monitoring
$245,153
$3.00
2/22/05
2/22105
Milwaukee
Wl
Monitoring
$40,956
$3.00
2/24/95
2/24/95
Jackson
WY
Monitoring
$47,272
$4.50
2/9/04
219/04
Jackson
WY
Monitoring
$26,316
$4.50
4/8/08
4/8/08
Phoenix
AZ
Multi -phase
$75,000,000
$4.50
12/6/04
12/6/04 $1,316,916,763
Phoenix
AZ
Multi -phase
$25,900,000
$4.50
9/27/07
9/27/07
Los Angeles
CA
Multi -phase
$700,000,000
$4.50
11/28/97
11/28/97
Los Angeles
CA
Multi -phase
$50,000,000
$4.50
10/23/07
10/23/07
Ontario
CA
Multi -phase
$84,774,000
$3.00
4/28/98
4/28/98
Orlando
FL
Multi -phase
$688,000
$3.00
7/12/05
7/12/05
Sarasota
FL
Multi -phase
$1,474,904
$3.00
6/29/92
1/31195
Chicago
IL
Multi -phase
$586,857
$4.50
6/28/93
6/28/93
Des Moines
IA
Multi -phase
$945,178
$4.50
8/16/05
8116/05
Covington
KY
Multi -phase
$21,287,000
$3.00
3/30/94
3130/94
Covington
KY
Multi -phase
$9,693,000
$3.00
11/29/95
11/29/95
Covington
KY
Multi -phase
$8,448,000
$3.00
3/28/01
3/28/01
Lexington
KY
Multi -phase
$45,544
$4.50
8/31/93
4/21/95
Lexington
KY
Multi -phase
$111,360
$4.50
8/31/93
9127/96
Baton Rouge
LA
Multi -phase
$1,315,124
$3.00
9/28/92
4/23/93
New Orleans
LA
Multi -phase
$3,750,000
$4.50
8/26/04
8/26/04
Detroit
MI
Multi -phase
$48,871,000
$3.00
9/21/92
9/21/92
Minneapolis
MN
Multi -phase
$103,237,546
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Manchester
NH
Multi -phase
$1,400,000
$3.00
10/13/92
3/4/96
Buffalo
NY
Multi -phase
$1,997,550
$4.50
5/25/07
5/25/07
Islip
NY
Multi -phase
$1,150,000
$3.00
9/23/94
9123/94
Airport Noise Report
169
December 12, 2008
170
CITY
STATE
PROJECT
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE PROD. TOTAL
Charlotte
NC
Multi -phase
$1,264,209
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
Charlotte
NC
Multi -phase
$3,941,093
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
Toledo
OH
Multi -phase
$1,676,083
$4.50
1/16/98
1/16/98
Tulsa
OK
Multi -phase
$8,400,000
$3.00
4/27/00
4/27/00
He
PA
Multi -phase
$118,518
$3.00
7/21/92
7/21/92
Knoxville
TN
Multi -phase
$528,431
$3.00
10/6/93
10/6/93
Nashville
TN
Multi -phase
$24,065,949
$3.00
2/26/04
2/26/04
Dallas
TX
Multi -phase
$1,913,478
$3.00
12/20/07
12/20/07
Seattle
WA
Multi -phase
$14,939,111
$3.00
8/13/92
8/13/92
Seattle
WA
Multi -phase
$34,400,000
$3.00
12/29/95
12/29/95
Seattle
WA
Multi -phase
$50,000,000
$3.00
6/24/98
10/16/01
Milwaukee
WI
Multi -phase
$34,994,828
$3.00
12/21/95
12/21/95
Mobile
AL
Planning
$116,700
$3.00
2/22/02
2/22/02 $15,701,321
Mesa
AZ
Planning
$11,175
$4.50
9/25/08
9/25/08
Burbank
CA
Planning
$282,440
$3.00
4/2/01
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Planning
$116,460
$3.00
6/16/06
6/16/06
Modesto
CA
Planning
$15,750
$4.50
6/6/08
616/08
Monterey
CA
Planning
$50,130
$3.00
7/14/98
7/14/98
Monterey
CA
Planning
$15,000
$4.50
217108
2/7/08
San Diego
CA
Planning
$268,942
$3.00
6/27/08
6/27/08
Pueblo
CO
Planning
$21,500
$3.00
4/11/96
4/11/96
Fort Myers
FL
Planning
$132,000
$3.00
8/31/92
8/31/92
Key West
FL
Planning
$15,000
$4.50
1/10/03
1/10/03
Key West
FL
Planning
$2,000
$4.50
4/14/04
4/14/04
Key West
FL
Planning
$1,250
$4.50
11/5/04
11/5/04
Orlando
FL
Planning
$21,919
$3.00
8/28/95
8/28/95
Sanford
FL
Planning
$23,048
$1.00
12/27/00
12/27/00
Tallahassee
FL
Planning
$129,330
$3.00
3/3/98
3/3/98
West Palm Beach
FL
Planning
$168,628
$3.00
1/26/94
6/11/97
Chicago
IL
Planning
$1,425,000
$3.00
7/5/95
7/5/95
Chicago
IL
Planning
$5,700,000
$3.00
6/28/96
6/28/96
Rockford
IL
Planning
$16,088
$3.00
7/24/92
9/2/93
Indianapolis
IN
Planning
$75,000
$3.00
12/20/96
12/20/96
Covington
KY
Planning
$337,000
$3.00
3/30/94
3/30/94
Covington
KY
Planning
$344,215
$3.00
3/31/98
3/31/98
Covington
KY
Planning
$1,501,000
$3.00
11/8101
11/8/01
New Orleans
LA
Planning
$23,858
$3.00
2/21/07
2/21/07
Detroit
MI
Planning
$386,156
$3.00
9/28/04
9/28/04
Traverse City
MI
Planning
$7,238
$4.50
3/2/06
3/2106
Duluth
MN
Planning
$17,255
$3.00
7/1/94
7/1/94
St. Louis
MO
Planning
$600,000
$3.00
11/24/08
11/24/08
Las Vegas
NV
Planning
$167,495
$3.00
2/24/92
2124/92
Reno
NV
Planning
$560,000
$3.00
5131/01
5/31/01
Albany
NY
Planning
$45,000
$3.00
9/27196
9/27/96
Charlotte
NC
Planning
$1,250,000
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
Akron
OH
Planning
$4,146
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Planning
$27,001
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Planning
$2,722
$3.00
10/18/99
10/18/99
Cleveland
OH
Planning
$584,570
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
Airport Noise Report
December 12. 2008 171
CITY
STATE
PROJECT
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE
( ) Columbus
OH
Planning
$13,822
$3.00
5/29/98
5X29/98
Dayton
OH
Planning
$70,000
$4.50
5/9/02
5/9/02
Allentown
PA
Planning
$33,334
$4.50
3/26/01
3/2801
State College
PA
Planning
$10.000
$3.00
5/26/99
5/28/99
Nashville
TN
Planning
$106'272
$3.00
2123/01
2123/01
Brownsville
TX
Planning
$108'702
$4.50
2/7/03
217/03
Laredo
TX
Planning
$16J86
$3.00
7/2303
13M1/96
Richmond
VA
Planning
$15,931
$3.00
7/3/97
70/97
Roanoke
VA
Planning
$2'458
$4.50
11X2404
11/2484
Milwaukee
VV|
Planning
$230,000
$3.00
7/9/02
789/02
Phoenix
AZ
Soundproofing
$4'000,000
$3.00
186@6
1/26/96
Phoenix
AZ
Soundproofing
$68'300,000
$4.50
6B02
6/502
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$43.625.109
$4.50
4&Y01
4X2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$730.774
$4.50
4/2/01
4X2101
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$437200
$4.50
4/2/01
4/201
Burbank
OA
Soundproofing
$770'931
$4.50
4/2/01
4/2/01
Burbank
OA
Soundproofing
$429/90
$4.50
482/01
4X2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$16.000,000
$4.50
4X2/01
482/01
Burbank
UA
Soundproofing
$4,570'000
$4.60
4/2/01
4/2Y01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$113.000
$4.50
582704
5X2704
Fresno
CA
Soundproofing
$444400
$3.00
9U8/08
9U088
Los Angeles
OA
Soundproofing
$35.000,000
$4.50
10823k07
10/23/07
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$024.321
$3.00
10/8/93
1031/94
Monterey
OA
Soundproofing
$333.333
$3.00
7/25Y01
7/27/01
(' \ Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$222.222
$lOO
5/30/02
5/30/02
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$222.222
$4.50
3A6/06
3N606
Monterey
OA
Soundproofing
$228.222
$4.50
3/1608
906/06
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$444,444
$4.50
20Y08
2f7/08
Oakland
Q4
Soundproofing
$240'000
$9.00
4/30/97
400/97
Oakland
OA
Soundproofing
$5.511.000
$8.00
6U099
6U8/99
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$2,418,000
$3.00
7/26/95
7/26/95
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$1.122,000
$3.00
7/24/98
7824/98
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$4,826.000
$4.50
6/20103
5/2003
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$5.132'960
$4.50
11/22/05
11/22/05
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$4.512,915
$4.50
6/27/00
6/2708
San Jose
OA
Soundproofing
$47J92'121
$3.00
6U1/92
6M1/92
San Jose
CA
Soundproofing
$7.500.000
$4.50
11/24/98
11/24/99
San Jose
OA
Soundproofing
$4.500,000
$4.50
4:20/01
4/20/01
San Jose
CA
Soundproofing
$01.589,000
$4.50
3/1/02
3002
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
0350.000
$3.00
031&9
8/31/99
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$75,000
$4.50
1/10/03
1/1008
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$47.500
$4.50
1/1003
1/10/03
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$400.000
$4.50
4/1404
4U4k04
Key West
R-
Soundproofing
$100'000
$4.50
11/504
11/5/04
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$100'000
$4.50
4/505
4/5/05
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$4.900'000
$3.00
6/28/93
6/28/93
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$1.140.000
$3.00
7/5/95
7/5/95
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$8.000'000
$4.50
11/15/98
11/15/96
Chicago
( \
|L
Soundproofing
$28/00,000
$4.50
11A5/98
11/15196
_
Airport Noise Report
PROJ. TOTAL
December 12, 2008 172
CITY
STATE
PROJECT
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE PROJ. TOTAL
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$10,000,000
$4.50
2/22/00
2/22/00
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$20,000,000
$4.50
7/7/00
7/7/00
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$50,000,000
$4.50
4/18/02
4/18/02
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$35,300,000
$4.50
6/28/93
6/28/93
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$113,271,731
$4.50
6/28/96
6/28/96
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$52,000,000
$4.50
6/28/96
6/28/96
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$20,000,000
$4.50
3/16/98
3/16/98
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$61,000,000
$4.50
4/16/01
4/16/01
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$30,000,000
$4.50
4/16/01
4/16/01
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$27,200,000
$4.50
4/16/01
4/16/01
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$4,000,000
$4.50
12/28/05
12/28/05
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$16,060,000
$4.50
6/17/04
6/17/04
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$2,440,000
$4.50
6/17/04
6/17/04
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$24,327,000
$4.50
8/17/06
8/17/06
Chicago
IL
Soundproofing
$11,272,000
$4.50
8/17/06
8/17/06
Peoria
IL
Soundproofing
$289,013
$3.00
9/8/94
9/8/94
Covington
KY
Soundproofing
$5,691,000
$3.00
8/3/05
8/3/05
Boston
MA
Soundproofing
$15,323,217
$4.50
8/24/93
1/27/97
Boston
MA
Soundproofing
$8,590,000
$4.50
4/20/06
4/20/06
Boston
MA
Soundproofing
$5,200,000
$4.50
4/20/06
4/20/06
Saipan
MP
Soundproofing
$80,648
$4.50
10/15/04
10/15/04
Rota
MP
Soundproofing
$4,480
$4.50
10/15/04
10/15/04
Tinian
MP
Soundproofing
$4,480
$4.50
10/15/04
10/15/04
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$2,617,279
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$450,537
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$19,768,494
$4.50
12/11/98
12/11/98 \
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$38,809,230
$4.50
1/24/03
1/24/03
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$5,000,000
$4.50
5/5/05
5/5/05
Reno
NV
Soundproofing
$157,500
$3.00
10/29/93
10/29/93
Manchester
NH
Soundproofing
$1,669,847
$3.00
4/1/03
4/1/03
Syracuse
NY
Soundproofing
$1,354,899
$4.50
8/22/05
8/22/05
Cleveland
OH
Soundproofing
$22,362,400
$3.00
9/1/92
9/1/92
Cleveland
OH
Soundproofing
$8,675,000
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
Cleveland
OH
Soundproofing
$10,000,000
$3.00
5/28/99
5/28/99
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$20,323
$3.00
7/14/92
10/27/93
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$71,974
$3.00
7/14/92
10/27/93
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$60,547
$3.00
7/14/92
10/27/93
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$269,810
$3.00
7/19/93
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$906,369
$4.50
5/29/98
5/29/98
Allentown
PA
Soundproofing
$100,000
$4.50
6/6/03
6/6/03
Allentown
PA
Soundproofing
$500,000
$4.50
6/6/03
6/6/03
Pittsburgh
PA
Soundproofing
$700,541
$4.50
7/27/01
7/27/01
Pittsburgh
PA
Soundproofing
$1,050,207
$4.50
1/7/05
1/7105
San Antonio
TX
Soundproofing
$24,840,225
.$4.50
8/29/01
12/1/04
Seattle
WA
Soundproofing
$16,134,627
$3.00
10/25/93
10/25/93
Seattle
WA
Soundproofing
$153,212
$3.00
10/25/93
10/25/93
Milwaukee
WI
Soundproofing
$2,290,230
$3.00
12/21/95
12/21/95
Milwaukee
WI
Soundproofing
$1,250,000
$3.00
4/15/04
4/15/04
Total: $2,866,712,289
Airport Noise
Report
December 12, 2008
PFC FUNDED NOISE PROJECTS (BY LOCATION)
(as of 11/30/08)
CITY
STATE
WORK CODE
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE
Birmingham
AL
Land
$3,173,639
$4.50
7/2108
7/2/08
Huntsville
AL
Land
$6,796,960
$3.00
3/6/92
6/28/94
Huntsville
AL
Land
$920,000
$3.00
3/6/92
11/22/95
Huntsville
AL
Land
$240,000
$3.00
3/6/92
5/28/97
Huntsville
AL
Land
$68,954
$3.00
10/19/98
10/19/98
Huntsville
AL
Land
$154,239
$4.50
10/30/02
10/30/02
Mobile
AL
Land
$440,431
$3.00
2/22102
2/22/02
Mobile
AL
Planning
$116,700
$3.00
2/22102
2122102
Juneau
AK
Land
$21,931
$4.50
5/30/01
5/30/01
Mesa
AZ
Planning
$11,175
$4.50
9/25/08
9/25/08
Phoenix
AZ
Land
$22,000,000
$3.00
6/5/02
6/5/02
Phoenix
AZ
Multi -phase
$75,000,000
$4.50
12/6/04
12/6/04
Phoenix
AZ
Multi -phase
$25,900,000
$4.50
9/27/07
9/27/07
Phoenix
AZ
Soundproofing
$4,000,000
$3.00
1/26/96
1/26196
Phoenix
AZ
Soundproofing
$68,300,000
$4.50
6/5/02
6/5/02
Tucson
AZ
Land
$3,288,473
$4.50
11/19/97
11/19/97
Tucson
AZ
Land
$396,888
$4.50
11/19/97
11/19197
Fort Smith
AR
Land
$90,756
$3.00
5/8/94
7/24/97
Fort Smith
AR
Monitoring
$20,555
$3.00
5/8/94
7/24/97
Little Rock
AR
Land
$3,314,737
$4.50
1/31/06
1/31/06
Burbank
CA
Land
$27,829,178
$3.00
6/17/94
215/97
Burbank
CA
Monitoring
$64,836
$3.00
4/2/01
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Planning
$282,440
$3.00
4/2/01
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$43,525,109
$4.50
412101
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$730,774
$4.50
4/2/01
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$437,200
$4.50
412/01
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$770,931
$4.50
4/2101
4/2/01
Burbank
CA,
Soundproofing
$429,490
$4.50
4/2/01
4/2101
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$16,000,000
$4.50
4/2101
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$4,570,000
$4.50
4/2/01.
4/2/01
Burbank
CA
Soundproofing
$113,000
$4.50
5/27/04
5/27/04
Burbank
CA
Planning
$116,460
$3.00
6/16/06
6/16/06
Carlsbad
CA
Misc
$18,226
$4.50
11/24/08
11/24/08
Fresno
CA
Soundproofing
$444,400
$3.00
9/18/96
9/18/96
Los Angeles
CA
Multi -phase
$700,000,000
$4.50
11/28/97
11/28/97
Los Angeles
CA
Monitoring
$3,450,000
$3.00
9/23/05
9/23/05
Los Angeles
CA
Multi -phase
$50,000,000
$4.50
10/23/07
10/23/07
Los Angeles
CA
Soundproofing
$35,000,000
$4.50
10/23/07
10/23/07
Modesto
CA
Planning
$15,750
$4.50
616/08
6/6/08
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$824,321
$3.00
1018/93
10/31/94
Monterey
CA
Planning
$50,130
$3.00
7/14/98
7/14/98
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$333,333
$3.00
7/27/01
7/27/01
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$222,222
$3.00
5/30/02
5/30/02
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$222,222
$4.50
3/16/06
3/16/06
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$222,222
$4.50
3/16/06
3/16/06
Monterey
CA
Planning
$15,000
$4.50
217/08
217/08
Monterey
CA
Soundproofing
$444,444
$4.50
217/08
26/08
Airport Noise Report
173
LOCATION
TOTAL - NOISE
$3,173,639
$8,180,153
$557,131
$21,931
$11,175
$195,200,000
$3,685,361
$111,311
$3,314,737
$94,869,418
$18,226
$444,400
$788,450,000
$15,750
$2,333,894
December 12, 2008 174
LOCATION
CITY
STATE
WORK CODE
AMOUNT
PPCLEVEL
IMPOSE
USE
TOTAL -NOISE /
Oakland
CA
Monitoring
$345,000
$3.00
6/26/92
6/26/92
\
$6,096,000 ~
Oakland
CA
Soundproofing
$240,000
$3.00
413007
4/30/97
Oakland
CA
Soundproofing
$5.511.000
$3.00
68809
6U8190
Ontario
CA
Multi -phase
$84.774'000
$3.00
4/28/98
4/28/98
"84,774800
Sacramento
CA
Monitoring
$662.000
$3.00
4/26/96
4/26/96
$662,000
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$2,418'000
$3.00
7/26/95
7/26/96
$19'304,817
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$1.122.000
$3.00
7/24/98
7/24/98
San Diego
OA
Monitoring
$1,224000
$3.00
5/2003
5/20103
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$4,626.000
$4.50
5/20/03
5/20/03
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
$5.132,960
$4.50
11/22/05
11822/05
San Diego
OA
Planning
$288'942
$3.00
6827/08
6/27/08
San Diego
CA
Soundproofing
G4.512.915
$4.50
6/27108
6/27/08
San Jose
OA
Monitoring
$184.000
$3.00
6M1192
6U1192
$121.886.121
San Jose
CA
Soundproofing
$47792.121
$8.00
6U1/98
6M102
San Jose
CA
Monitoring
$100'000
$3.00
11/24/90
11/24/99
San Jose
CA
Soundproofing
$7,600'000
$4.50
11/24/99
11/24/99
San Jose
CA
Monitoring
$221'000
$8.00
12d5/00
12M600
San Jose
UA
Soundproofing
$4.500.000
$4.50
4/2001
4/20N1
Gan Jose
DA
Soundproofing
$61,580.000
$4.50
8h/02
3h/02
Pueblo
Co
Planning
$21.500
$3.08
4U1/96
40106
$21.500
Fort Lauderdale
FL
Monitoring
$858'000
$3i00
11d04
4/30/98
$4'158'000
Fort Lauderdale
FL
Land
$3'500'000
$3.00
413098
423/01
Fort Myers
FL
Planning
$132.000
$3.00
8/31&2
8M1/92
$132I00
Gainesville
Key West
FL
FL
Land
Soundproofing
$144,860
$350,000
$4.50
$3.00
02002
031/99
8/2902
8/3109
$144.868 '
$1.090'750 \
Key West
FL
Planning
$15.000
$4.50
1/10/03
1/10/03
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$75'000
$4.60
1/10/03
1d0/03
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$47,500
$4.50
180/03
1/10/03
Key West
FL
Planning
$2,000
$4.50
4U4K04
404/04
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$400.000
$4.50
4/1404
4d4/04
Key West
FL
Planning
$1.250
$4.50
11/5/04
118J04
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$100'000
$4.50
11/504
11/5/04
Key West
FL
Soundproofing
$100.000
$4.50
4/5/05
4/5/05
Orlando
FL
Planning
$21'819
$3.00
8/28195
8/28/95
$709.919
Orlando
FL
Multi -phase
$688.000
$8.00
702/05
7h2105
Pensacola
FL
Lund
$597.708
$8.00
11/23/92
11/23/98
$782.284
Pensacola
FL
Land
$60.480
$3.00
11/23/92
8/1005
Pensacola
FL
Miou
$65,076
$3.00
11/23/92
8h0/95
Sanford
FL
Planning
$23.048
$1.00
12127/00
12/2700
$2l048
Sarasota
FL
Multi -phase
$1.474.904
$3.00
6/29/92
1/3105
$6'874904
Sarasota
FIL
Land
$5,400'000
$3.00
600/92
12115/95
Tallahassee
FL
Land
$3.128'225
$IOU
3/3/98
8/308
$3.257565
Td|ah0000a
FL
Planning
$129.830
$3.00
30/98
30/98
Tampa
FL
Mism
$1'692'110
$4.50
6/1603
5/16K03
$1'692110
West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$1'000'000
$3.00
1/26/94
8/29/98
$12.233,092
West Palm Beach
FL
Lund
$2'302'300
$3.00
1/2604
029/96
West Palm Beach
FL
Land
$374'616
$9.00
1/26/94
6/11/97
West Palm Beach
FL
Lend
$1,387.548
$3.00
1/26/94
6d1/97
_
West Palm Beach FL Land $S�0O�OU $3�O 1�G04� GU1��
�
December 12, 2008
CITY
STATE
WORK CODE
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE
Indianapolis
IN
Planning
.$75,000
$3.00
12/20/96
12/20/96
Des Moines
IA
Multi -phase
$945,178
$4.50
8/16/05
8/16/05
Covington
KY
Monitoring
$140,000
$3.00
3/30/94
3/30/94
Covington
KY
Multi -phase
$21,287,000
$3.00
3130/94
3/30/94
Covington
KY
Planning
$337,000
$3.00
3/30/94
3/30/94
Covington
KY
Multi -phase
$9,693,000
$3.00
11/29/95
11129/95
Covington
KY
Planning
$344,215
$3.00
3/31/98
3/31/98
Covington
KY
Multi -phase
$8,448,000
$3.00
3/28/01
3/28/01
Covington
KY
Planning
$1,501,000
$3.00
11/8/01
11/8/01
Covington
KY
Monitoring
$387,000
$3.00
7/26/02
7/26/02
Covington
KY
Soundproofing
$5,691,000
$3.00
8/3/05
8/3/05
Lexington
KY
Multi -phase
$45,544
$4.50
8/31193
4/21/95
Lexington
KY
Multi -phase
$111,360
$4.50
8/31/93
9/27/96
Louisville
KY
Land
$58,800,000
$3.00
1/29/97
1/29/97
Louisville
KY
Monitoring
$125,000
$3.00
3/27/01
3/27/01
Baton Rouge
LA
Multi -phase
$1,315,124
$3.00
9/28/92
4/23/93
New Orleans
LA
Multi -phase
$3,750,000
$4.50
8/26/04
8/26104
New Orleans
LA
Planning
$23,858
$3.00
2121/07
2121/07
Boston
MA
Soundproofing
$15,323,217
$4.50
8/24/93
1/27/97
Boston
MA
Soundprooding
$8,590,000
$4.50
4/20/06
4/20/06
Boston
MA
Soundprooding
$5,200,000
$4.50
4/20/06
4/20/06
Detroit
MI
Misc
$225,000
$3.00
9/21/92
9/21/92
Detroit
MI
Multi -phase
$48,871,000
$3.00
9/21/92
9/21/92
Detroit
MI
Planning
$386,156
$3.00
9/28104
9/28/04
Traverse City
MI
Planning
$7,238
$4.50
3/2/06
3/2/06
Duluth
MN
Planning
$17,255
$3.00
7/1/94
7/1/94
Minneapolis
MN
Land
$21,500,000
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Monitoring
$230,273
$3.00
5113/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Multi -phase
$103,237,546
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$2,617,279
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$450,537
$3.00
5/13/94
5/13/94
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$19,768,494
$4.50
12/11/98
12/11/98
Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$38,809,230
$4.50
1/24/03
1/24/03
Minneapolis
MN
Land
$20,500,000
$4.50
5/5/05
5/5/05
.Minneapolis
MN
Soundproofing
$5,000,000
$4.50
5/5/05
5/5/05
Rota
MID
Soundproofing
$4,480
$4.50
10/15/04
10/15/04
Saipan
MID
Soundproofing
$80,648
$4.50
10/15/04
10/15/04
Tinian
MID
Soundproofing
$4,480
$4.50
10/15/04
10/15/04
Kansas City
MO
Land
$11,180,610
$3.00
12/21/95
12/21/95
St. Louis
MO
Land
$23,016,867
$3.00
9/30/92
9/30/92
St. Louis
MID
Land
$25,683,623
$3.00
1/31/96
1/8/98
St. Louis
Mo
Monitoring
$100,000
$3.00
11/24/08
11/24/08
St. Louis
Mo
Planning
$600,000
$3.00
11/24/08
11/24/08
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$7,991,645
$4.50
2124/92
2124/92
Las Vegas
NV
Planning
$167,495
$3.00
2/24192
2/24/92
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$5,250,000
$3.00
2/24/92
6f7/93
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$26,250,000
$4.50
2/24/92
617/93
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$1,440,492
$4.50
2/24/92
6/7/93
Las Vegas
NV
Land
$10,654,182
$4.50
2124/92
3/15/95
Airport Noise Report
176
LOCATION
TOTAL - NOISE
$945,178
$47,828,215
$156,904
$58,925,000
$1,316,124
$3,773,858
$29,113,217
$49,482,156
$7,238
$17,255
$212,113,359
$4,480
$80,648
$4,480
$11,180,610
$49,400,490
$51,753,814
December 12, 2008
175
CITY
STATE
WORK CODE
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL IMPOSE
USE
LOCATION
TOTAL0`
VVm�Palm Beach
FL
Planning
$168,628
$3.00
1/26/94
6/11/97-�B
°«��
West Palm Palm8each
FL
Land
$2'000.000
$3.00
8/28100
12/1302
Atlanta
GA
Land
$7'280.374
$4.50
11/29/07
11/29/07
$7,880,374
Bloomington
|L
Land
$35'000
$8.00
1215/97
12/5/97
$35000
Chicago
|L
Mise
$11.493
$3.00
6/28/93
6/28/93
$12""'06G8D7
Chicago
|L
M�c
707
| .00
6/28/93
6/28/93Q3
'
Chicago
|L
Monitoring
$325.000
$3.00
6&28/93
6/28/93
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$4'900,000
$3.00
6/28/93
6/28/93
Chicago
|L
Planning
$1.425.080
$3.00
78/95
7/5/95
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$1.140,000
$3.00
78/95
7/5/95
Chicago
IL
""".�p"vmg
$o'uuu'uuu
$4.50
11/1506
11/15/96
Chicago
K
Soundproofing
$28'400.000
$4.50
11/15/88
11/15/96
Chicago
|L
Misn
$2,057'107
$3.00
2/22/00
2/2800
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$10,000,000
$4.50
2/2200
212200
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$20.000,000
$4.50
717/00
7/7/00
Chicago
|L
Mism
$2,500.000
$8.00
4d8/02
408/02
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$50000,000
$4.50
4d8/02
418A02
Chicago
|L
kKism
$42,389
$3.00
6/28/93
6/2803
$411UO8OOS
Chicago
|L
Multi -phase
$586,857
$4.50
6/28/936/28/93'
'
Chicago
~
|L
.""mpomng
w35,300,000
$4.50
6/28/93
8/28/93
Chicago
|L
900.000
$3.00
6128/93
016/94
Chicago
|L
Mise
$2,993.028
$4.50
6/28/96
6/28/96
Chicago
|L
Planning
$5,700.000
$lOO
6/28/96
6/28/96
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$113.271'731
$4.50
6/28/98
6/28/96
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$52000.000
$4.50
6/28/96
6/28/96
�
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$20'000.000
$4.50
8U6/98
3h6@8
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$61,000.000
$4.50
4U6014/16/01Ch|cagn
|L
Soundproofing
$30,000,000
$4.50
4/16/01
4d6/01
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$27200.000
$4.50
40601
4/16/01
Chicago
|L
oun unng
Soundproofing
$4'000.000
$4.50
12/28/05
12/2805
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$16.060.000
$4.50
6U7804
6/17/04
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$2,440'000
$4.50
6d7/04
6/17/04
Chicago
|L
Monitoring
$1,000.000
$3.00
01706
3h7/06
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$24327000
$4.50
01706
8;7/06
Chicago
|L
Soundproofing
$11.272'000
$4.50
8h7/06
8/17/06
Moline
|L
Lund
$335.916
$4.60
9/29/94
9/29894
$700990
Moline
|L
Lund
$365.084
$4.50
3/12/98
3/12/98'
Peoria
|L
Land
$382'426
$3.00
9/8/94
9/8/94
$816880
Peoria
|L
Soundproofing
$289.013
$3.00
9/8/94
9/8/94'
Peoria
|L
Land
$145/41
$4,50
213/0
2/3/00
Rockford
|L
Planning
$16'088
$3.00
7824/92
9/2/93
$16088
Springfield
IL
Land
$24,740
$3.00
3/27/92
4/28/93
$l"~~'351
Springfield
IL
Land
�1�.�
$3.00
3/27/92
488V03
Springfield
/L
Land
$24897
$3.00
8/27/92
4/28/93
Springfield
|L
Land
$14'721
$IOO
3/27/92
4/28/98
Springfield
|L
Land
$551
$lOO
3127/92
4/28A93
GphnghmN
|L
Land
$081G7
'
$3.00
11X24/93
3/11/97
Indianapolis
IN
Land
$42,632,859
$3.00
6/28/93
6/28/93
$43'106,543
mommupo|m
IN
kAiso '
$498,684
$4S0
12120/96'
12/20/96
/
December 12, 2008 177
LOCATION
CITY
STATE
WORK CODE
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE
TOTAL - NOISE
Reno
NV
Soundproofing
$157,500
$3.00
10/29/93
10/29/93
$717,500
Reno
NV
Planning
$560,000
$3.00
5/31/01
5/31/01
Manchester
NH
Multi -phase
$1,400,000
$3.00
10/13/92
3/4/96
$3,069,847
Manchester
NH
Soundproofing
$1,669,847
$3.00
4/1/03
4/1/03
Albany
NY
Planning
$45,000
$3.00
9/27/96
9/27/96
$45,000
Buffalo
NY
Multi -phase
$1,997,550
$4.50
5/25/07
5/25/07
$1,997,550
Islip
NY
Multi -phase
$1,150,000
$3.00
9/23/94
9/23/94
$1,150,000
Syracuse
NY
Soundproofing
$1,354,899
$4.50
8/22/05
8/22/05
"$1,354,899 "
Charlotte
NC
Land
$52,270,000
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
$58,725,302
Charlotte
NC
Multi -phase
$1,264,209
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
Charlotte
NC
Multi -phase
$3,941,093
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
Charlotte
NC
Planning
$1,250,000
$3.00
8/23/04
8/23/04
Akron
OH
Land
$19,210
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
$107,252
Akron
OH
Land
$14,635
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Land
$5,293
$3.00
10121/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Land
$21,334
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Planning
$4,146
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Planning
$27,001
$3.00
10/21/96
10/21/96
Akron
OH
Planning
$2,722
$3.00
10/18/99
10/18/99
Akron
OH
Land
$12,911
$4.50
4/4/02
4/4/02
Cleveland
OH
Soundproofing
$22,362,400
$3.00
9/1/92
9/1/92
$78,444,570
Cleveland
OH
Land
$7,137,600
$3.00
9/1/92
2/2/94
Cleveland
OH
Land
$29,685,000
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
- , Cleveland
OH
Planning
$584,570
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
Cleveland
OH
Soundproofing
$8,675,000
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
Cleveland
OH
Soundproofing
$10,000,000
$3.00
5/28/99
5/28/99
Columbus
OH
Monitoring
$16,509
$3.00
7/14/92
10/27/93
$2,439,499
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$20,323
$3.00
7/14/92
10/27/93
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$71,974
$3.00
7/14/92
10/27/93
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$60,547
$3.00
7114/92
10/27/93
Columbus
OH
Land
$119,600
$3.00
7/14/92
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Land
$379,070
$3.00
7/14/92
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Land
$519,723
$3.00
7/14/92
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Mise
$61,752
$3.00
7/19/93
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$269,810
$3.00
7/19/93
3/27/96
Columbus
OH
Planning
$13,822
$3.00
5/29/98
5/29/98
Columbus
OH
Soundproofing
$906,369
$4.50
5/29/98
5/29/98
Dayton
OH
Land
$309,206
$4.50
7/25/94
7/25/94
$1,009,206
Dayton
OH
Planning
$700,000
$4.50
5/9/02
5/9/02
Toledo
OH
Multi -phase
$1,676,083
$4.50
1/16/98
1/16/98
$1,676,083
Tulsa
OK
Multi -phase
$8,400,000
$3.00
4/27/00
4/27/00
$8,400,000
Portland
OR
Monitoring
$715,750
$3.00
12!7/05
1217/05
$715,750
Allentown
PA
Land
$244,387
$4.50
3/26/01
3/26/01
$1,220,696
Allentown
PA
Land
$220,475
$4.50
3/26/01
3/26/01
Allentown
PA
Monitoring
$30,556
$4.50
3/26101
3/26/01
Allentown
PA
Planning
$33,334
$4.50
3/26/01
3/26/01
Allentown
PA
Land
$91,944
$4.50
6/6/03
6/6/03
Allentown
PA
Soundproofing
$100,000
$4.50
6/6/03
6/6/03
Allentown
PA
Soundproofing
$500,000
$4.50
6/6/03
6/6/03
Airport Noise
Report
December 12, 2008 178
Airport Noise Report
C
LOCATION
CITY
STATE
WORK CODE
AMOUNT
PFC LEVEL
IMPOSE
USE
TOTAL - NOISE
Erie
PA
Multi -phase
$118,518
$3.00
7/21/92
7/21/92
$360,891
Erie
PA
Land
$242,373
$4.50
5/13/03
5/13/03
Pittsburgh
PA
Soundproofing
$700,541
$4.50
7/27/01
7/27/01
$1,750,748
Pittsburgh
PA
Soundproofing
$1,050,207
$4.50
1/7/05
1/7/05
State College
PA
Planning
$10,000
$3.00
5/26/99
5/26/99
$10,000
Providence
RI
Land
$10,382,213
$4.50
11/27/00
11/27/00
$10,382,213
Chattanooga
TN
Land
$100,000
$3.00
4/25/97
4/25/97
$115,000
Chattanooga
TN
Land
$15,000
$4.50
11/22/00
11/22/00
Knoxville
TN
Multi -phase
$528,431
$3.00
10/6/93
10/6/93
$528,431
Nashville
TN
Planning
$106,272
$3.00
2/23/01
2/23/01
$24,372,221
Nashville
TN
Multi -phase
$24,065,949
$3.00
2/26/04
2/26/04
Nashville
TN
Monitoring
$200,000
$3.00
5/10/07
5/10/07
Brownsville
TX
Planning
$108,702
$4.50
2/7/03
2/7/03
$108,702
Dallas
TX
Multi -phase
$1,913,478
$3.00
12/20/07
12/20/07
$1,913,478
Dallas
TX
Monitoring
$1,266,151
$3.00
1117/96
11/7/96
$1,266,151
Harlingen
TX
Land
$96,630
$3.00
7/9/98
7/9/98
$96,630
Laredo
TX
Planning
$15,786
$3.00
7/23/93
12/31/96
$15,786
San Antonio
TX
Soundproofing
$24,840,225
$4.50
8/29/01
12/1/04
$25,085,378
San Antonio
TX
Monitoring
$245,153
$3.00
2/22/05
2/22/05
Salt Lake City
UT
Land
$465,488
$3.00
10/1/94
10/1/94
$1,320,968
Salt Lake City
UT
Land
$331,072
$4.50
4/30/01
4/30/01
Salt Lake City
UT
Land
$524,408
$4.50
2/28/02
2/28/02
Lynchburg
VA
Land
$17,762
$3.00
4/14/95
4/14/95
$17,762
Richmond
VA
Planning
$15,931
$3.00
7/3/97
7/3/97
$15,931
Roanoke
VA
Land
$65,000
$4.50
11/24/04
11/24/04
$67,458
Roanoke
VA
Planning
$2,458
$4.50
11/24/04
11/24/04
Bellingham
WA
Land
$166,000
$3.00
4/29/93
4/29/93
$1,352,350
Bellingham
WA
Land
$732,000
$3.00
10/5/94
10/5/94
Bellingham
WA
Land
$454,350
$3.00
12/11/96
12/11/96
Seattle
WA
Multi -phase
$14,939,111
$3.00
8/13/92
8/13/92
$115,626,950
Seattle
WA
Soundproofing
$16,134,627
$3.00
10/25/93
10/25/93
Seattle
WA
Soundproofing
$153,212
$3.00
10/25/93
10/25/93
Seattle
WA
Multi -phase
$34,400,000
$3.00
12/29/95
12/29/95
Seattle
WA
Multi -phase
$50,000,000
$3.00
6/24/98
10/16/01
Appleton
WI
Land
$14,502
$3.00
4/25/94
4/25/94
$14,502
Milwaukee
WI
Land
$3,099,197
$3.00
2/24/95
2/24/95
$48,380,398
Milwaukee
WI
Land
$1,425,187
$3.00
2/24/95
2/24/95
Milwaukee
WI
Monitoring
$40,956
$3.00
2/24/95
2/24/95
Milwaukee
WI
Multi -phase
$34,994,828
$3.00
12/21/95
12/21/95
Milwaukee
WI
Soundproofing
$2,290,230
$3.00
12/21/95
12/21/95
Milwaukee
WI
Misc
$50,000
$3.00
3/8/01
3/8/01
Milwaukee
WI
Misc
$5,000,000
$3.00
7/9/02
7/9/02
Milwaukee
WI
Planning
$230,000
$3.00
7/9/02
7/9/02
Milwaukee
WI
Soundproofing
$1,250,000
$3.00
4/15/04
4/15/04
Cheyenne
WY
Land
$81,192
$4.50
3/28/01
3/28/01
$210,951
Cheyenne
WY
Misc
$129,759
$4.50
3/28/01
3/28/01
Jackson
WY
Monitoring
$47,272
$4.50
2/9/04
2/9/04
$73,588
Jackson
WY
Monitoring
$26,316
$4.50
4/8/08
4/8/08
$2,866,712,289
Total:
$2,866,712,289
Airport Noise Report
C
179
A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments
volume 20, Number 43 December 19, 2008
Outlook 2009
AVIATION AND THE ENVIRONMENT:
SOME PREDICTIONS FOR THE YEAR AHEAD
By Carl Burleson
Director, FAA Office of Environment and Energy
[In this special report, Mr. Burleson looks forward to 2009, a year he believes
will be pivotal in influencing our ability to meet the environmental challenges
posed by the growth in air travel. His predictions, which represent his views and
not those of the FAA, begin below on a wry cautionary note.]
"Prediction is very d4jrlcult, especially if it's about the future."
Niels Bohr, Nobel Laureate in Physics
Predictions about the future have an inherent risk. Even if you get the out-
comes right — it can be for reasons that no one anticipated. With this caveat, as we
enter a new year, with a new Administration, here are some thoughts about how
_ aviation and environmental issues will develop in the year ahead.
(Continued on p. 180)
FICAN
FICAN RECOMMENDS USING ANSI STANDARD
TO PREDICT AIRCRAFT NOISE AWAKENINGS
For the first time in 11 years, the Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation
Noise (FICAN) has updated its recommendation regarding how best to predict the
likelihood of people being awakened by aircraft noise.
In 1997, FICAN recommended a curve for predicting the maximum likelihood
of behavioral awakening from a single aircraft noise event. That dose -response re-
lationship has been applied in environmental noise studies since that time.
But now FICAN is recommending use of the American National Standards In-
stitute's recently published standard for estimating the likelihood of behavioral
awakenings (ANSI S 12.9-2008, Quantities and Procedures for Description and
Measurement of Environmental Sound — Part 6. Methods for Estimation ofAwak-
enings Associated with Outdoor Noise Events Heard in Homes.
"ANSI S 12.9-2008 provides a method to predict sleep disturbance in terms of
percent awakenings or numbers of people awakened associated with noise levels in
terms of indoor A -weighted sound exposure level," FICAN explained in a state-
ment that will be placed on its website (www.fican.org).
"In contrast to the earlier FICAN recommendation, the probability of awaken-
ing is less for a single noise event, but the new Standard enables estimation of
(Continued on p. 181)
Airport Noise Report
In This Issue...
Outlook ... Carl Burleson,
director of the FAA's Office
of Environment and Energy,
offers predictions on what is
likely to happen in the air-
craft noise and emissions
arena in 2009 - p. 179
FICAN... For the first time
since 1997, FICAN updates
its recommendation on how
to predict the likelihood of
awakenings from aircraft
noise exposure - p. 179
Research ... ACRP seeks
contractor to prepare guide-
book to help small airports
improve their environmental
performance - p. 181
Portland Int'l ... Port of
Portland announces launch
of Lochard's WebTrak sys-
tem, which will cover greater
Portland (OR)Nancouver
(WA) area - p. 182
News Briefs ... FAA ap-
proves PFC for Lambert -St.
Louis Int'l that will fund Part
150 noise compatibility
study and upgrade to noise
monitoring system - p. 182
December 19, 2008
Outlook, from p. 179
Let's start with a simple fact of aviation's close alignment
with economic activity. Given the current economic and fi-
nancial turmoil, aviation growth will slow. Despite the fall
in oil prices, the downturn in economic growth is causing air-
lines to reduce capacity and operations.
This leads to the first prediction: U.S. aviation's envi-
ronmental footprint will continue to shrink in the coming
year. That said, looking to the longer term, nothing has
changed the fundamental challenge that environment and en-
ergy issues will pose for developing the capacity and flexibil-
ity of the U.S. aviation system.
Prediction number two: Aircraft noise will continue
to represent the most significant environmental impedi-
ment to airport expansion in the U.S. Despite an excep-
tional record over the past three decades, reducing the
number of Americans exposed to significant aircraft noise by
over 90%, aircraft noise remains a principal focus for com-
munity concerns and opposition for airport expansion. Con-
tribution from aircraft emissions to air quality issues will
remain relatively small. However, with 80 percent of our
major airports located in areas that do not meet national air
quality standards, these issues will continue to add to the
complexity, length, and uncertainty of the environmental re-
views.
Prediction three: Aviation greenhouse gas emissions
and energy issues will gain increasing attention as part of
the general debate on climate change and cleaner and re-
newable energy sources. There is already a significant de-
bate ongoing internationally of how best to address aviation
emissions growth. It is unclear when climate change legisla-
tion will pass or what form it will take, but the new Adminis-
tration's focus on climate change and energy will shape the
discussion of aviation growth this coming year.
The good news is that U.S. fuel bum has actually de-
clined this decade, going against the general trend of growth
in most of the world. Since 2000, U.S. airlines have con-
sumed less fuel each year, the equivalent of taking about 2
million cars off the road each year through 2007. This was
achieved despite flying 20% more passenger miles and 30%
more cargo miles. Despite this exceptional performance,
there is no room for complacency as heightened concerns
about greenhouse gases could pose the greatest potential con-
straint to aviation's future growth.
Prediction four: International developments will play
a strong role in shaping climate change issues on aviation.
Whether considering the effort at ICAO to develop a plan of
action for greenhouse gas emissions through the Group on
International Aviation and Climate Change, the potential
legal conflict with Europe over its attempt to force U.S. air-
lines into its emissions trading system without our consent,
or the climate negotiations in Copenhagen in December 2009,
each will influence the outcome of how aviation greenhouse
emissions are dealt with in the year ahead.
Prediction five: We will not make much progress in
tackling environmental issues without decisions from the
incoming Administration and Congress on funding and
authorities. FAA still lacks reauthorization legislation or a
budget for our Next Generation Air Transportation System
(NextGen) Plan. The environmental provisions in FAA's
reauthorization package enjoyed broad support in both the
House and Senate and across party lines. Yet without passage
and funding, FAA will be limited in its ability to implement
our endeavors to reduce aviation's environmental footprint
through a combination of enhanced air traffic procedures,
new aircraft and engine technology, and sustainable alterna-
tive fuels.
Prediction six: This will be the year to see whether al-
ternative fuel takes off for aviation. We are poised for sev-
eral flight tests, progress on a new generic standard for a .
synthetic fuel, and progress on assessing life -cycle costs. As
the new alternative fuel industry is starting to put its infra-
structure in place, we should see whether the aviation sector
makes gains in shaping the production for its needs.
My last prediction: As part of the NextGen effort, this
will be the year of policy questions. Goals, metrics, and tar-
gets for U.S. aviation environmental performance in noise, air
quality, and climate change will be on the table. A large num-
ber of questions arise from this discussion. Does the signifi-
cance threshold (or land use compatibility criterion) .change
from 65 dB DNL? Will we use supplemental metrics differ-
ently? How best to characterize air quality impacts? How do
we handle the non -0O2 aviation emissions given their signif-
icant uncertainties? How do we deal with trade-offs between
various environmental impacts as well as their solutions?
How do we employ an environmental management systems
(EMS) approach for the national aviation system? These and
other questions will shape the debate this year.
In closing, this will be a pivotal year to influence our abil-
ity to meet the long-term environmental challenges posed by
aviation growth. The focus of the new Administration on cli-
mate change and energy issues will accentuate as well as
offer attention to some of the key environmental issues facing
aviation. The good news is we have plans and initiatives
ready to move forward. The challenge remains that we will
need time, resources, and significant innovation if U.S. avia-
tion is going to meet the challenge of flying safer, quieter and
cleaner.
Airport Noise Report
December 19, 2008 181
FICAN, front p. 179
awakenings from an entire night of noise events. The Stan-
dard was developed from field studies of,behavioral awaken-
ing primarily in homes near airports subject to routine jet
aircraft operations. The database used in derivation of the
method consists of about 10,000 subject -nights of observa-
tions in a variety of communities in the United States and
Europe."
FICAN said that it recommends the use of this new esti-
mation procedure for future analyses of behavioral awaken-
ings from aircraft noise. FICAN said it recognizes that
additional sleep disturbance research is underway by various
research organizations, and results of that work may result in
additional changes to FICAN's position. Until that time,
FICAN recommends the use of ANSI S 12.9-2008.
ANSI 5.12.9-2008 is available for purchase at:
http://webstore.ansi.org/.
Standard Fills Gap in Assessment
Nicholas Miller, senior vice president of Harris Miller
Miller & Hanson Inc., one of the main architects of the new
ANSI standard, explained that it "provides a method that fills
in a long -missing gap in assessment of aircraft noise."
"With this standard, it is now possible to estimate the
number of people awakened by nighttime aircraft operations
and, perhaps more importantly, the changes in awakenings
that are likely to result from changes at and around an air-
port."
The new standard, he said, will provide answers to ques-
tions, such as: "How beneficial will sound insulation be in
terms of reduced awakenings? How many fewer people are
likely to be awakened when Optimized Descent Procedures
(ODPs) are implemented? Will the introduction of nighttime
cargo operations cause large increases in awakenings? What
are the likely effects of added early morning departures —
how many more people are likely to be awakened?"
The standard offers two methods, both applicable to a full
night of operations. "One method does not distinguish time
of night but uses only the sound level of each event - all
night time operations are treated as equivalent in terms of
their likelihood of waking people. The second method in-
cludes time of night of the noise event. There is considerable
evidence that people wake more easily as morning ap-
proaches, so the second method includes this response and
weights the noise events accordingly."
Miller offered two examples of analyses of noise abate-
ment that are now possible with this methodology:
- Sound Insulation: using a typical set of aircraft noise
levels that might be experienced about three to four miles
from a medium hub commercial airport, if the sound insula-
tion improves by 7 to 10 decibels,, the number of people
awakened could decrease by as much as 25%.
- Optimized Descent Procedures (formerly known as
Continuous Descent Arrivals): The sound level reductions
from ODPs generally occur well outside the 65 dB DNL, at 5
to 10 miles from the runway, so the benefits of such proce-
dures are difficult to demonstrate using DNL contours. Nev-
ertheless, there is still likely to be a quantifiable benefit in
reducing the number of awakenings since ODPs reduce the
sound levels by 5 dB or more in those areas.
"In short," Miller said, "the new methodology provides a
tool to more effectively evaluate the effects of noise on peo-
ple, and implications of projects at airports."
Research
6110 Ely a W.111 I 'PIRRIWILVA1111016,1V'1MINN
The Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) is-
sued a request for proposals on Dec. 12 seeking a contractor
for a one-year, $200,000 project under which a guidebook for
improving environmental performance at small airports will
be developed.
"Small airports have limited resources and staffing and,
as a result, these airports usually do not have an environmen-
tal practitioner on staff who is intimately knowledgeable in
the environmental arena," the RFP explains.
"No one resource is available to airport managers (or their
governing boards) that outlines all the federal environmental
regulations. In addition, practices that exceed requirements
and promote environmental stewardship, sometimes referred
to as `sustainable practices', are also not familiar to small air-
ports.),
However, the RFP does not specify what environmental
issues will be addressed in the guidebook, such as aircraft
noise or emissions. Marci Greenberg, the Transportation Re-
search Board staff member responsible for the project, said it
will be up to those responding to the RFP to determine the
scope and scale of the issues to be addressed in the guide-
book.
The objective of the research project is to provide man-
agers of small airports with a guidebook (1) promoting envi-
ronmental awareness, (2) identifying federal environmental
compliance requirements, (3) outlining those best manage-
ment practices that proactively enhance environmental stew-
ardsbip, and (4) identifying resources/tools that airports can
use to be proactive. The guidebook should be written so that
a non -environmental practitioner can easily understand it.
"Airports and their governing boards are committed to
being good neighbors, enhancing their environmental efforts,
and increasing public awareness of those initiatives," the RFP
states. "Given that every airport is unique, each airport must
select, prioritize, and implement practices based on individual
circumstances. Research is needed to provide small airports
with information and guidance on potential environmental
initiatives applicable to their situations."
The RFP for ACRP Project 02-03 is available at:
http://www.trb.org/TRBNet/ProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectlD=25
76. Proposals for the project must be submitted by Jan. 28,
Airport Noise Report
December 19, 2008
no
ANR EDITORIAL
Portland Intl
ADVISORY BOARD
PORTLAND INT'L LAUNCHES
LOCHARD'S WEBTRAK SYSTEM
John J. Corbett, Esq.
The Port of Portland, OR, announced Dec. 15 that it has launched
Spiegel & McDiarmid
Lochard's WebTrak online flight tracking system, which will cover the
Washington, DC
greater Portland (OR)Nancouver (WA) area.
"WebTrak offers a wealth of information about each flight, ranging
Carl E. Burleson
from altitude and direction to aircraft type and airline to flight or tail num-
Director, Office of Environment and Energy bee" the Port said. For security purposes, the system is delayed 90 minutes
Federal Aviation Administration
and does not show government, military or law enforcement flights.
"WebTrak responds to community interest in easily obtaining infor-
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
mation about flights causing noise concerns in our region," said Jason
Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance
Schwartz, Port noise management manager. "The system also makes it
Carlsbad, CA
easy for our neighbors to reach us for assistance, including further investi-
gating concerns."
Peter J. Kirsch, Esq.
Schwartz said that concerns submitted to the Port noise management
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
team are thoroughly investigated, and staff usually respond within 48
Denver
hours. In some cases, he said, the information provided by citizens or ob-
tained during the investigation is used to refine the noise abatement pro -
Vincent E. Mestre, P.E.
gram and in discussions with aircraft operators.
President, Mestre Greve Associates
"WebTrak came about as a result of community interest expressed
Laguna Niguel, CA
during the recent update of the PDX Part 150 Noise Compatibility Study,
and during regular meetings of the PDX Citizen Noise Advisory Commit -
Steven F. Pflaum, Esq.
tee. The system was established as part of other improvements to the Air -
McDermott, Will & Emery
port Noise and Operations Monitoring System, used by Port noise
Chicago
management staff. Key partners in the project include the Federal Avia-
tion Administration, and Lochard, the system manufacturer."
Mary L. Vigilante
President, Synergy Consultants
---
Seattle
In Brief..
FAA Approves St. Louis PFC
The Federal Aviation Administration announced Dec. 16 that it has ap-
proved a $4.50 Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) for Lambert -St. Louis In-
ternational Airport to be imposed from May 1, 2002, to Feb. 1, 2022.
The PFC will be imposed for a total estimated revenue of $783.6 mil-
lion for various airport projects, including a Part 150 Airport Noise Com-
patibility Program study and an upgrade to the airport noise monitoring
system.
For further information, contact Mark Schenkelberg in FAA's Central
Region Airports Division: tel: (816) 329-2645.
•,1
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
e-mail: editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price $850.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients,
is granted by Aviation Emissions Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.
183
=uor5 �i�iS�' ry'•"�,' � '-'Sa„,m 'ti, 6M:o".-,,ks- !„1
A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments
Volume 20, Number 44 December 24, 2008
Ft. Lauderdale Hollywood Intl
FAA ISSUES ROI.) ON RUNWAY EXTENSION;
COMMUNITIES CONSIDERING CHALLENGE
On Dec. 19, the Federal Aviation Administration issued its Record of Decision
(ROD) approving a controversial project to lengthen the south commuter runway at
Ft. Lauderdale -Hollywood International Airport to accommodate commercial traf-
fic in order to manage passenger growth through the year 2020.
"After years of studying the potential environmental impacts of increasing the
airport's capacity to meet the demand of air traffic and reduce flight delays, the
FAA has determined that extending the airport's south runway (9R/27L) to a length
of 8,000 feet is the federally preferred option and offers the surrounding communi-
ties the least impact,” the Broward County Board of County Commissioners said in
a statement released the same day.
The decision by the FAA to extend the south runway is the same physical nm -
way layout that was approved by the County Board in June 2007; however, the
FAA did not back a plan endorsed by Broward County to impose a runway use plan
1 on the extended south runway in order to reduce noise impact.
- Aviation Director Kent George said that Broward County and its Aviation De -
(Continued on p. 184)
Land Use
A lack of communication among airport stakeholders is the root of almost every
noise and land use issue that airports face, according to the findings of a recently
released study done by the PARTNER research consortium.
The study, "Land Use Management and Airport Controls," is a follow-on to ear-
lier research that studied land use and noise complaint patters near Fort Laud-
erdale -Hollywood International Airport, Orlando -Sanford International Airport, and
Denver International Airport.
In this one-year, follow-on project, Manassas Regional Airport, Norman Y.
Minta San Jose International Airport, and Hopkins Cleveland International Airport
were studied. These additional airports provide three more exemplary profiles:
Manassas is a general aviation airport seeking to expand; San Jose is a medium hub
airport located in a densely populated residential area; and Hopkins is surrounded
by suburban cities, which are scrutinizing its operation and expansion.
The study's principal investigators were Dr. Kai Ming Li, Professor of Mechan-
ical Engineering at Purdue University, and Dr. Gary Eiff, Professor Emeritus in
Purdue's Department of Aviation Technology.
They offered several suggestions to prevent incompatible airport land use and
(Continued on p. 184)
Airport Noise Report
In This Issue...
Ft. Lauderdale Inti ... FAA
issues its ROD approving ex-
tension of GA runway to ac-
commodate commercial
carriers; communities decid-
ing whether sue - p. 183
Land Use... PARTNER
study concludes lack of com-
munication is root of air-
ports' problems - p. 183
Noise Monitoring...
Lochard's new WebTrak Fly -
Quiet identifies planes not
complying with noise abate-
ment procedures - p. 184
Marana Regional ... FAA
approves most of Part 150
program for airport - p. 185
Los Angeles Intl ... Airport
Board awards sound insula-
tion contract - p. 185
DOT... Airport and airline
trade groups are pleased with
Obama's pick of Ray La -
Hood for new Secretary of
Transportation - p. 186
Parks ... Native American
sought to serve on Overflight
Advisory Committee - p. 186
December 24, 2008
Ft. Lauderdale, from p. 183
partment are "committed to working with the cities of Dania
Beach, Davie, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and all the com-
munities of the Greater Fort Lauderdale area, to mitigate any
impacts which might affect the quality of life of the airport's
neighbors."
But Neal McAliley, an attorney with the Miami law firm
White & Case, who represents some of those cities, said,
"We are very disappointed that the FAA has decided to au-
thorize a runway development alternative that causes the
most environmental impacts, costs the most money, and cre-
ated the most safety and security issues, when there were
other viable alternatives available. This is the kind of deci-
sion that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) was
intended to avoid."
McAliley said "the local communities have not yet made
a decision whether to challenge the FAA's decision and I ex-
pect that decision to be made sometime in January."
Some 1,051 homes will be located in the 65 dB DNL and
higher contours of the extended runway and an additional
1,023 homes will be located in the contiguous residential
areas beyond the 65 DNL contour and eligible for sound in-
sulation.
FAA made clear in the ROD that it will allow Broward
County do extend sound insulation to the natural boundaries
of neighborhoods, even if they lie beyond the 65 DNL con-
tour line.
The Air Transport Association had complained last sum-
mer that such "block -rounding" as it is called, has gone too
far at Ft. Lauderdale International and Bob Hope airports (20
ANR 78).
Land Use, front p. 183
to minimize impact on citizens' lives. "First and foremost,"
they said, "a proactive and effective communication link
should be established and maintained between city, county,
airport, neighborhood communities, and real estate develop-
ers."
"Airport administrations should be able to voice their
concerns about near -airport incompatible land use and have a
substantial influence in the decisions on the use of lands in
the vicinities of airports. They should also make efforts to
educate surrounding communities and provide forums where
aviation education can take place and questions and concerns
can be addressed."
They also recommended that "a nationally -standardized
method of complaint collection and reporting be designed
and implemented in order to increase the value of noise com-
plaint data and the ability to draw conclusions from its com-
parison and analysis."
The professors recommended that community members
be informed of future airport projects and how they may im-
pact their lives. "Due to the importance of local airports, a
cooperative and successful relationship between these parties
184
will serve to benefit everyone involved," they said.
They also suggested that an ordinance be put into place
"making it mandatory for any individual, city, county or real
estate developers to obtain approval from the Airport Director
for any substantial structure or zoning change occurring
within the immediate vicinity of an airport and under flight
paths."
In addition, they said that noise abatement procedures,
which currently are voluntary at Manassas, San Jose Interna-
tional, and Cleveland Hopkins, be made mandatory. "Making
these procedures mandatory will certainly help in alleviating
the issues between airports and the communities," they wrote.
One limiting factor of both this study and the earlier one
was the small number of airports that were investigated, the
researchers said. A larger sample of airports, they said, "will
give a broader spectrum of demographics and enable one to
generalize common land use trends, local and state laws, and
overall land use development history.
In addition, the researchers said a supplemental study at
emerging secondary airports similar in size to Manassas
would be helpful to compare how they are handling their
prominent land use and noise issues, especially with the ex-
pected high volume of very light jet aircraft within the next
ten years."
"Airport land use, planning and noise management are
formidable challenges faced by airports around the world. If
local airports and surrounding municipalities are to coexist
effectively, greater emphasis must be placed on these issues
and continued study must be done to understand such dy-
namic and complex issues."
The study can be downloaded from the PARTNER web-
site: http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/partner/reports/index.html.
The Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emis-
sions Reduction (PARTNER) is a Center of Excellence spon-
sored by the Federal Aviation Administration and Transport
Canada.
Noise Monitoring
[KOXV1 I W MA II&I
This fall Australia -based Lochard launched a new product
call WebTrak FlyQuiet that identifies flights that do not com-
ply with airport noise procedures and communicates that in-
formation to the aircraft operator.
"The operator can rapidly communicate with their pilots
and pinpoint the reason for any deviations," the firm ex-
plained. "This enables airports to reinforce procedures and
improve future compliance. Aircraft operators can quickly in-
vestigate noise and flight track violations themselves and col-
laboratively work with airports and pilots to ensure they `fly
quieter'.
WebTrak "actively monitors, manages and improves air-
craft operators' compliance with airport noise abatement pro -
Airport Noise Report
December 24, 2008
cedures to reduce aircraft noise," Lochard explained.
WebTrak FlyQuiet is the company's latest in the Web -
Trak suite of modules designed to assist airports with noise
management, particularly as it affects their local community.
So far more than 30 airports around the world, from Long
Beach, California, to London Heathrow in the United King-
dom, are using WebTrak services, Lochard said.
"WebTrak FlyQuiet is an online tool that leverages off an
airport's existing infrastructure and displays information
about how well an aircraft operator is doing at meeting noise
program goals."
A secure website is provided for each operator to review
their flights, noise levels, weather and associated ATC audio
recordings. It also monitors performance trends and provides
report summaries and documentation about procedures at the
airport.
"Lochard is constantly finding new ways to assist air-
ports to reduce aircraft noise," said Phil Stollery, Vice Presi-
dent, Product Strategy and Marketing, "The FlyQuiet module
builds on our noise system's existing capability to manage
preferred noise and flight track procedures. It makes the en-
tire process more efficient and effective in reducing noise by
quickly providing richer information to pilots than is cur-
rently possible and at the same time making it easier for the
airport to administer."
WebTrak-Fly Quiet continues Lochard's approach of de-
veloping web -based modules focusing on performing a spe-
cific task.
For fiuther information, e-mail info@lochard_com
Manana Regional
On Dec. 22, the Federal Aviation Administration an-
nounced that it bad given overall approval to the Part 150
Airport Noise Compatibility Program for Marana Regional
Airport in Arizona, which is a general aviation reliever for
Tucson International Airport.
The airport, owned by the Town of Marana, is located 15
miles northwest of Tucson International and had 110,000
takeoffs and landings in 2007.
The proposed Part 150 program for Marana Regional
contained eight proposed actions for noise abatement, land
use planning and program management on and off the air-
port.
Outright approval was granted for one noise abatement
measure, four of five land use management measures, and
two program management measures.
The approved measures include:
- Developing a pilot and public education program;
- Revising the Town of Marana's General Plan to estab-
lish a land use compatibility threshold for noise sensitive
land uses;
- Consider adopting an airport compatibility checklist for
discretionary review of projects within the Airport Influence
Area (AIA);
- Encouraging Pima County, AZ, to adopt a similar
checklist for projects within the AIA that fall under the
county's jurisdiction;
- Consider maintaining the rural residential and agricul-
tural zoning classifications between the 55 DNL and AIA;
- Adopt an overlay zone to regulate the development of
noise sensitive land uses within the AIA;
- Update noise exposure maps and noise compatibility
program; and
- Monitor implementation of the Part 150 Noise Compati-
bility Program.
FAA disapproved a proposed land use management meas-
ure that would have had the Town of Marana consider revis-
ing existing subdivision regulations to require a noise and
avigation easement as a condition of subdivision approval for
those areas within the AIA.
For further information, contact Victor Globa in FAA's
Los Angeles Airports District Office; tel: (310) 725-3637.
The Record of Approval for Marana's Part 150 Program
will be available on-line at: http://www.faa.gov/airports_air-
traffic/airports/environmental/airport noise/part150/states/.
Los Angeles Intl
1,
r 1 i0101-15 w r � r.
The Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners re-
cently awarded a contract to DAB Construction, Inc., of Los
Angeles for a portion of the Los Angeles International Air-
port's (LAX) Residential Soundproofing Program.
The $953,370 contract covers sound insulation modifica-
tions on 49 dwelling units (24 condominium units, seven sin-
gle-family dwellings, three duplexes, 1 three -unit apartment
and 1 nine -unit apartment), all within Los Angeles City
Council District 11.
The overall LAX Residential Soundproofing Program in-
cludes more than 9,400 residences in the Los Angeles com-
munities of Westchester, Playa del Rey and South Los
Angeles with a recorded Community Noise Equivalent Level
(CNL) of 65 decibels or higher. Contractors typically install
double -paned windows, solid -core doors, fireplace doors and
dampers, attic baffles, insulation and beating -ventilation -air
conditioning (HVAC) to achieve a noise level reduction of
approximately one-half in a home's interior.
The 49 dwelling units in this project will bring the num-
ber of units completed or under construction and approved by
the Board to 6,267. The remaining 3,133 units are either in
the design phase, awaiting commencement of design, or the
owners have not responded or have declined to participate.
The program is administered by the Los Angeles World
Airports Residential Soundproofing Bureau.
Airport Noise Report
December 24, 2008
John J. Corbett, Esq.
Spiegel & McDiarmid
Washington, DC
Carl E. Burleson
Director, Office of Environment and Energy
Federal Aviation Administration
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance
Carlsbad, CA
Peter J. Kirsch, Esq.
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
Denver
Vincent E. Mestre, P.E.
President, Mestre Greve Associates
Laguna Niguel, CA
Steven F. Pflaum, Esq.
McDermott, Will & Emery
Chicago
Mary L. Vigilante
President, Synergy Consultants
Seattle
186
WMAX-3 NEM
President-elect Obama's selection of retiring congressman Ray La -
Hood for his Secretary of Transportation has pleased both airline and air-
port trade groups.
In a statement, ATA said, "Congressman Ray LaHood has a well-de-
served reputation for his even-handed, thoughtful and deliberative ap-
proach to complex issues. Upon confirmation, ATA and our member
airlines look forward to working closely with Secretary LaHood on criti-
cal issues affecting airlines, their customers and the nation, most impor-
tantly revitalization of the aviation infrastructure, prudent and equitable
action on the reauthorization of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund and
how to best utilize the airlines' potential to generate the economic growth
that the Obama administration is intent on developing."
Airports Council Intemational-North America (ACI -NA) President
Greg Principato issued the following statement: "ACI -NA and its mem-
ber airports congratulate Congressman Ray LaHood on his expected nom-
ination as Secretary of Transportation. Aviation in the United States faces
a number of critical issues including the need to boost investment in infra-
structure and modernization of our outdated air traffic control system.
These issues cry out for the kind of bipartisan action and leadership that
have been the hallmark of Congressman LaHood's career. Upon confir-
mation, we look forward to working with him to solve these problems and
build an air transportation system that will support economic growth in
the 21st century."
National Parks
The Federal Aviation Administration announced Dec. 18 that it is
seeking a representative of Native American tribal concerns to fill a va-
cancy on the National Parks Overflights Advisory Group Aviation Rule-
making Committee.
The advisory group was formed to provide continuing advise and
counsel regarding commercial air tour operations over and near national
parks and adjacent to tribal lands.
For further information, contact Barry Brayer on the Special Programs
staff in FAA's Western -Pacific Region Headquarters; tel: 9310) 725-3800;
e-mail: Barry. Brayer@faa.gov.
F.11 I IN,. r , r
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 7294867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
e-mail: editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price $850.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients,
is granted by Aviation Emissions Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.