The URL can be used to link to this page

06-11-2008 ARC Packet1. 2. 3. 4. G� CITY OF MENDOTA I�EIGHTS AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA June 11, 2008 — City Hall Call to Order - 7:00 p.m. Roll Call Approval of the Minutes from the Apri19, 2008 and May 19, 2008 Airport Relations Cornmission Meetings. Unfinished and New Business a. Review Tower Tour Issues. b. Review May 21, 2008 NOC Meeting c. Review 2008 Plan of Action d. Updates for Introduction Book Acknowledse Receipt of Various Renorts/Corresnondence: a. b. c. d. e. April 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report April 2008 (New Format) ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Letter from NOC Airport Noise Report, May 23, 2008 Airport Noise Report, May 30, 2008 Other Commissioner Comments or Concerns Uncomin� Meetin�s MAC Meeting City Council Meeting Public Comments Adjourn 6-16-08 1:00 p.m. 6-17-08 7:30 p.m. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to prov'rde the aids. This may not, however, be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at (651) 452-1850 with requests. 1" CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES May 19, 2008 The Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission met at City Hall to drive together to the MSP Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for a 4:30 p.m. iour conducted by ATCT Operations Manager Carl Rydeen and MAC Aviation Noise Manager Chad Leqve. The following Commissioners were present: Liz Petschel, Chair; Robin Ehrlich, Vice Chair; Bill Dunn and Ken Reed, Commissioners; and Sandra Krebsbach, Council Member. Also present: Jim Danielson, City Administrator; Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator; Ellsworth Stein, former ARC meinber; and Mary Heintz, Recorder. Approval of Minates It was Commission consensus to table approval of the April 9, 2008, A.R.0 ineeting minutes to the next regular ARC meeting. Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence �� A. March 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report � -- � B. March 2008 ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis C. Guy Heide letter D. Airport Noise Report, April 4, 2008 E. Airport Noise Report, April 1 l, 2008 F. Airport Noise Report, April 18, 2008 G. Airport Noise Report, Apri125, 2008 H. Airport Noise Report, May 2, 2008 I. Airport Noise Report, May 9, 2008 MSP Air Traffic Control Tower Meetin� and Tour The ARC met with Mssrs. Rydeen and Leqve and other tower representatives in the tower meeting room before the tour. At the meeting, Mr. Rydeen displayed a speeded-up simulation of actual flights departing and arriving at MSP that showed crossing traffic to reach runway 17. Mr. Rydeen cited factors that determine runway choice and said controllers do not differentiate between 12L and 12R. Mr. Leqve noted that flight impact has been decreased due to fleet mix (decreased DC9s and increased CRJs) and lower-than-anticipated flights. Mr. Rydeen stated that MSP ATCT procedures are driven ) by safety and efficiency/noise abatelnent. � , Minutes of Meeting and Tour— May 19, 2008 — Mendota Heights Airport Relations Couunission Council Member Krebsbach asked when the R.NAV would be put into use. Mr. Rydeen quoted September 24 but said only 65% of aircraft will be compatible at that time. He � briefly described the system (which takes the place of heading navigation) and said it will (' increase potential for aircraft to be more precise and efficient and provide a predictable track. The goal is to work with Northwest in creating and publishing procedures for the new system and then coordinate them between the tower and pilots. Mr. Rydeen said that he would like to utilize the system for daytime as weli as initial nighttime use. Council Member Krebsbach commented on inequitable use of the two 12s. Mr. Rydeen reported that 12L night-time 2007 annualized flights were forecasted at 14.1 % and came in at 19.5%. He reiterated that runway choice is determined according to efficiency and safety and said the biggest issue is runway incursion. Discussed ensued. Mr. Leqve, responding to a question about the possible Northwest Airlines-Delta merger, stated that growth opporiunities are anticipated at MSP and Detroit for international destinations and gates. Mr. Rydeen addressed questions submitted in advance by ARC concerning out-of- corridor excursions (does not believe it is pilot error), wheels down (seeks standardization), RUS update, crossing the corridor update, runway selection (determined by ground controller according to destination, adding that separation occurs on the ground), radio recording of pilot-tower conversations (doesn't want the pilot to be a controller or noise expert; if a problem or anomaly is identified, for instance, by Mendota Heights and it can be fixed, he wili do something about it if he is able; and Chair Petschel ( �. commented that she is interested more in trends versus individual occurrences), and conformance to FEIS. Responding to a question posed at the meeting, he reported that MSP ATCT is fully staffed and many new employees coming in are very highly qualified a$er completing their training at the North Dakota facility. The group then took a tour of the control tour and radar room. Adiourn The tour was completed at 6:30 p.m. and the group returned to City Hall. Ilpcomin� Meetin�s • MAC Meeting — May 19, 2008 —1:00 p.m. • City Council Meeting — May 20, 2008 — 7:30 p.m. • NOC Meeting — May 21, 2008 —1:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Mary Heintz TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 2 . � � D ��'A►�I 1\I\ D •� : 1..� • � Il► I I I AIl2PORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES Apri19, 2008 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, April 9, 2008, at 7:00 p.m., in the Large Conference Room at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. The following Commissioners were present: Liz Petschel, Chair; Bill Dunn, Sally . Lorberbaum, Ken Reed, and Dave Sloan, Commissioners. Guests: Mike Heide and Mike Kosel, Rogers Lake Group. Also present were: Jim Danielson, City Administrator; John Bergman, Apple Valley Noise Ovezsight Coinrnittee Alternate; and Mary Heintz, Recorder. Not Present: Robin Ehrlich, Vic Chair; Lyle Odland, Corrunissioner; Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to Mr. Danielson. Approval of Minutes ( � Chair Petschel requested a spelling correction to "Senator Metzen" on page one, second . paragraph under Review/LJpdate Goals and Objectives. A lnotion was made by Commissioner Lorberbaum, seconded by Commissioner Dunn, to approve the March 12, 2008, ARC meeting lninutes as amended. The minutes were approved. Unfinished and New Business A. Presentation by Guy Heide and Mike Kosel, Rogers Lake Group Mr. Guy Heide distributed a copy of the final draft report of the MAC Enviromnental Assessment for the Runway 4-22 Extension. He said the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reasoning for redirecting traffic at night over the Mendota Heights corridor is because fewer residences are located there, which is untrue, and commented that Eagan had pressured the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) to work on the FAA to do so. Chair Petschel stated that the measure had passed by only one vote at that time and that industry representatives and the Northwest Airlines representative had voted against it. Commission Meeting — Apri19, 2008 � Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission ' Mr. Heide reported that his wife has been unable ta sleep because of the airplane noise overhead, even with cotton in her ears, and claims that it has damaged his and his wife's (� health, their home bricks have shattered and windows have been damaged, and his and � Mr. Kosel's ch.i.inneys "have been lost." He said he doesn't know what ARC can do but wanted to bring the complaint to the Commission's attention. He provided specifics of his ongoing investigation over the last five years concerning irregularities, "false statements," and "fraud," which have included, but not been limited to, his filing of 120 Freedoin of Information Acts with the FAA, 100 with MAC, and various meetings with pertinent officials. Mr. Heide commented that Airport improvement grants were sought to extend Runway 4-22 because Northwest had threatened to reduce operations and move elsewhere if it didn't get an 11,000-foot runway. He cited various discrepancies in the Environmental Assessment report's data and xnaps, noted postdated amendments and missing accounting records, and said he believes the FAA understated activity and mislead the public. Mr. Heide said he is at the point where he wants to contact the Miller-Ciresi law firm to litigate the Airport's "pattern of wrongdoing" that could reach in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Mr. Mike Kosel commented that it appears Mendota Heights was left out of the data in order to make the numbers fit and referenced discrepancies in maps, which began in 1992. He said some MAC Comrnissioners have violated their oaths of office in using the 1996 map 65 DNL Contour, which never existed. In addition, he said the Cornmissioners are suppose to disclose their conflicts of interest and cited one, in particular, who was � invested in Northwest, Jet Blue and Continental but never disclosed that information � before voting, and said he believes something should be done about that. Commissioner Reed said the discrepancy in numbers on the Enviroxunental Assessment report may be math errors. Chair Petschel stated that justification for extending the 4-22 Runway was because of Northwest's insistence to lengthen it for Korean flights and that those flights were to go over Bloomington (nine residential blocks were insulated). She added, however, that those flights never went over Bloomington, but rather onto 12L, 12R and 30s, and so the contouxs over Mendota Heights haven't reflected the flights that didn't go over Bloomington. Mr. Kosel said the maps do not reflect Mendota Heights in the least, that noise runways are dead center on the runways but that isn't the way planes take off from the airport and instead leave 15 degrees off the ground. Comm.issioner Reed commented that the situation may be a huge set of bizarre coincidences. He said that he doesn't mean to diminish any wrongdoing believed to have been done but that he worked for HNTB and knows that totals can be generated that are bad. He added that he doesn't understand what motivation there would be for such alleged wrongdoing. � Commission Meering — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Re]ations Commission Mr. Kosel said their group has done a tremendous amount of work and the 1992 maps are ; not representative of the area. He then reported on the tremendous volurne of flights he's experienced overhead at home and the corresponding number of complaints he's had to make because of it. Chair Petschel assured Mssrs. Heide and Kosel that the ARC has fought aggressively to ensure the City's fair share of nighttime flights and concurred that it has absorbed twice as many as it should have. She reported that she'd been told that gates on the southeast are closest to 12L, so that runway is preferred in order to save fuel. Mr. Kosel invited Cornmissioner Reed to his home to review all of the documentation that he and Mr. Heide have pulled together, about which 5% was shared at the evening's meeting, and Conunissioner Reed agreed to do so. Commissioner Dunn offered to join Commissioner Reed when the meeting occurs. Chair Petschel reassured Mssrs. Heide and Kosel that the ARC's first goal is to address nighttirne operations. She said they would be welcome to come back to ARC with their PowerPoint presentation regarding their issues, which they reported that they have been working on. Mssrs. Heide and Kosel excused themselves from the meeting and, general discussion ensued. ( ! Commissioner Reed described the public radio frequency real-time sensors that were utilized at the Tampa International Airport, where he used to work, and suggested that something similar be used at MSP. He stated that tracks, noise levels, and audio transmissions are monitored and time stamped, even identifying who assigns aircraft to particular runways, and quoted a cost of the $100,000 for such a system. Chair Petschel said the suggestion could be made to Carl Rydeen during the ARC's May 19 Tower tour. Commissioner Dunn commented that "the surest way to change behavior is to monitor lt." Chair Petschel said the Corninission also has to be prepared to address the issue of fuel cost and that the Airport's choice will be the shortest trek to the runway. She did also note, however, that less fuel would be required to go to 12R than to burn fuel to go to 17. Commissioner Reed added that the difference between the cost to save fuel and spend money to sound-insulate homes has to be balanced. Comrnissioner Reed commented that not much progress seems to have been made by Chad Leqve's group or NOC, in that he doesn't see numbers coming down. He said in his same role at Tampa, as Mr. Leqve, improvement was charted every three months to ensure numbers were inoving closer to goals. Chair Petschel said ARC needs to tallc with Mr. Rydeen to develop a strategy regarding the Tower crossing the corridor over the freeway at nonpeak times and that an accounting is needed as to how frequently that � procedure is being used. Commissioner Reed said he would want the ineasure to go back ' to the source, controller, pilot andlor airline policy. 3 Commission Meeting — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Aitport Rela6ons Commission B. Review Airport Section of 2008 Comprehensive Plan Chair Petschel stated that the Comprehensive Plan is revised every ten years, to address ( various City priorities, and that NIr. Danielson had pulled pieces relative to ARC for its review of content and to ensure they are in synch with the Airport Plan of Action, goals and objectives, and dovetail with the City and NOC. Recommended Visions • Under "Airport Plan," second para -�raph, remove first two sentences (which follow�: "Since the opening of the "North-South runway, previous issues with the distribution of air traffic have been reduced. A11 r�sidential areas in Mendota Heights were in conformance with the original aviation guidelines and their previousprojections of air noise and air traffic." • Under "Airport Plan," report that the third para�raph is not true (which follows�: "The Runway Use System at MSP relies heavily on "land compatibility" as a guiding principle for departure determination, thereby increasing the volume of traffic and the percentage of exclusive use of the southeast corridor, which was zoned commercial/industrial in cooperation with regional and local planning agencies. This increased traffic has impacted existing compatible residential neighborhoods in Mendota Heights." • Under "Goals and Policies," chan�e Goal 1 to read: "Monitor and control where possible negative airport impacts in Mendota Heights." • Under "Goals and Policies," change Goal 2 to read: "To support the equitable distribution of flights within all communities located close to IVISP." • Under "Goals and Policies," insert "�opulation in place of "area" to read: "To work diligently with all noise issues and agencies to decrease aircraft noise in volume and to decrease noise irnpacts to the population." • Under "Goals and Policies " add Goal 4: "Add part 150 plan and subsequent noise compatibility program." • Under "Airport Noise Policies," chan�e Policy 6 to read: "Advocate to increase general aviation use to other reliever airports." • Under "Airport Noise Policies," add Polic_y 8 to read: "Inform the public/media regarding MAC's progress in addressing noise issues and limitations of noise compatibility program." • Under "History of Noise Reduction Efforts," asked whether it is enforceable because it's a written agreement between MAC and the CitY (follows�: "Agreement to a contract with MA.0 prohibiting construction of a third parallel runway." • Under "History of Noise Reduction Efforts," add Policy 6 to read: "Ongoing dialogue with adjacent communities, legislators, NOC, FAA and MAC for the purpose of noise attenuation." • Under "History of Noise Reduction Efforts," revise third para�raph b a� "about their participation" under that section to read: "The City has worked through the various agencies on issues including: modification of aircraft landings and deparh�res, �- supporting the installation of ANOMS, supporting the prohibition of Stage II aircraft, �� and educating homeowners about their participation in the Part 150 program." 0 Commission Meeting — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission s Under "Impacts of Future Land Use Plannui�," second sentence in second para�raph, correct spellin� to "townhome." Inform them IT"S NOT TRUE Should guiding principle of land use development is runway usage at MSP which utilizes the parallel runway for capacity and therefore should plan noise compatible land uses in line. With parallel runways and future land use should reflect continued firaffic on the parallel runways. Given time constraints, it was Commission consensus to complete the review of the document at the June ARC meeting. C. NOC Update Chair Petschel reported that MAC deputy director Nigel T'i.��.ney has retired and will be replaced by Denny I?r�bst and ICevin Hochn7a71 will replace UPS representative �'ete I:�i�Ter�norc. Mr. Livermore was a member of the original Blue Ribbon Pane1 that put MA.0 together and the only person on the carrier side that voted with the communities on the sound insulation for 60/64, to his risk and displeasure of Kathle�n. Nelson. Discussion had taken place regarding projected and actual noise contours, required as a result of the lawsuit. Operations off 12L are higher than projected and use of 17 is below -- forecast in acival numbers but up 10% over last year. The noise contoux over Mendota j � Heights is larger than projected. ANOMS actual nurnbers are close to modeled nurnbers, - so projections match the actual very closely with the exception of 12L. Runway use and nighttilne operations are driving the current noise inap the most. Upgrade for ANOMS software and sensors related to real-tirne flight tracking will cost $500,000. Worst offenders for lowering landing gear is Fed Ex; UPS is on board and Tim Butalla, chief pilot for Northwest, sits on the NOC and has been briefing pilots from Fed Ex and Delta, hoping to see positive changes. The word is getting out about coinpliance and the next thing to watch is to see if Apple Valley sees positive effects from the compliance. Commissioner Reed commented that no one should expect contours to match very well, as they are generated five years in advance, that the 2007 projection started in 2000. He said the area most different between projection and actual is Bloomington because flights aren't departing on 17 as much as they want them to and there should be a bigger difference and Mendota Heights getting lnore equitable benefit. Commissioner Reed said the numbers don't make sense because departure distributions are twice as much on 12L as 12R but arrivals are nearly identical. D. Tower Tour — May 19, 2008, ARC Meeting The ARC meeting has been moved from May 14 to May 19, when the Tower tour is scheduled. Those scheduled for the tour will meet at City Hall at 4 p.m. and drive together to the 4:30 p.m. tour. Attendees should RSVP to Mr. Danielson via email, as the ( � Tower requests a complete list of na.ines in advance of the tour. 5 Commission Meeting — April 9, 2008 � Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Commissioner Sloan reported that he wouldn't' be able to attend. Mr. Rydeen and Mr. Leqve will meet with the Comrnission in a separate room after the tour. �� Issues to be addressed (requested in advance by the Tower) include, but may not be limited to: • Northern excursions e Nighttime operations s Crossing corridor use • Runway selection determination and who assigns the runway s Radio recording system s Conformance to EIS • Reason as to why twice as many flights utilize 12L as 12R when a similar number of gates are close to each one s Reason as to why 12R getting relief from 17, instead of relief for Mendota Heights on 12L Mr. Bergman suggested that NOC members be invited to join the tour, but it was ARC consensus that the decision to invite them be left to Mr. Rydeen's discretion. Chair Petschel recommended that Mr. Danielson inform the City of ARC's May meeting date change, in the event members of the public might be planning to attend. E. Reschedule October 15, 2008, ARC Meeting It was Commission consensus that the October 15, 2008, ARC meeting be moved to October 8, in that it conflicts with Yom Kippur. F. Update for Introduction Book None. Acknowled�e Receipt of Various Reports/Corresuondence A. February 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report B. February 2008 (New Format) ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Deparhare Corridor Analysis C. MSP Noise News (Winter 2008) � D. Airport Noise Report, March 7, 2008 E. Airport Noise Report, March 14, 2008 Other Commission Comments or Concerns None. 0 i" �. r �. , Commission Meeting — April 9, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Upcomin� Meetin�s • City Council Meeting — April 15, 2008 — 7:30 p.m. • MAC Meeting — April 21, 2008 —1:00 p.in. Public Comments None. Adiourn Commissioner Dunn made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Lorberbaum, to adjourn the meeting at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Mary Heintz TinzeSaver Off S'ite Secretarial, bac. � � ; 7 C � � I � � i � � � �� . . , . � � •.�� /. c a.a:��ti.!' r.t.;9 �,!•'.(iy��' '" .� . O A G� 'V`Y \� CJ�;G,.t_'�' ' ",�. h }Sr� 4.,�',' F�'��St � 7'`'C'04tt��ti t - ' �: . _ �_� ,1.. ': :,.: , . _ ' .L . • .._: _I. _ .: _' ../- .:: �.. : _ ..'. '.' . Tab1e of Contents for Ap�i12008 C, . Complaint Summary 1 Noise Complaint Map 2 FAA Available Time for Runway Usage 3 MSP All Operations Runway Usage 4 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage 5 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition 6 MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 7 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 8 MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators 9-11 \, - MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type 12 MSP Top 15 N3ghttisne Operators Stage Mix 13 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 14-17 MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map 18 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 19 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 20 Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 21 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 22 MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 23-35 C Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL 36-38 A Product of the Metropolitan Airpo�ts Commission ANOMS Program MSP Complaints by City Apri12008 EAGAN MINNEAPOLIS BUI2NSVILLE BLOOA-SINGTON MENDOTA APPLE VALLEY RICHFIEliD EDh`N PRAfILTE SAINT PAUL EDINA ROSEMOUNT CHANHASSEN FARIv11NGTON MINNETONKA L.AICEVTLLE I-lUGO SAINT LOUIS PAI2K PLYMOUTH SAVAGE \'VA'1'ERT01ArN TWP 138 19 is 24 28 2 3 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r 0 Notc: Shaded Columns rcprescm MSP camplaints tled via the Intemet. Sum of % Total olCompioin�s may not eqval 100% duc to rovnding. 'As of May 2005, ihe MSP Complain�s by Ciry rcport inctudes mvltiplc � �� compinint dcscriptors per individual wmplainL Therefore, the num6v of compinint descriptors may be more ihun the number of reported comptaints. 16 38 s 125 � 2 852 299 0 2 ? 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2277 1361 94 638 622 296 879 397 6 4 3 ? 70 16 6 � �1 1 1 i 1 64 60 17 16 14 13 8 G 4 2 ? 2 1 1 i 1 i r i � 1 34.1% 20.4% 1.4°10 9.5% 9.3°�n 4.4% 13?% �.9% O.l°/n 0.1% 0°/n 0% 1% o.2�io 0.1% 0.1% 0.1°/n o�ro 0% o�io 0% Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 - 1- � MSP International Airport Aviation Noise Complaints for April 2008 iVumber of Complaints per Address _' � � 1-7 8-20 21-41 42-74 -2- 75-133 134-228 229-542 543-844 Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 C C Available Hours for Runway Use April 2008 (Source: FAA Runway Use Logs) FAA Averaqe Dailv Count Air Carrier 799 806 Commuter 406 400 General Aviation 54 43 Military 7 10 Note: Surn of daily average count may not equal total due to rounding. Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 -3- All Operations Runway Use Report April 2008 -- Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. - 4- Report Generated: 05l12/2008 14:10 � �. � - Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report April 2008 � -;� �" �Gtlfield ''' a,+. � i -- �"`�� ::1'°j �'� I Z ;;,�;.,i j... ." K. �i � �'!;`` _._........._.....i ir: � � Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 - 5- April 2008 IVISP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition Note: Sum of fleet mix % may not equal t00 % due to rounding. Note: Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet all stage 111 criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS DCBQ are re-engined with manufactured stage 3 engines and are ciassified as Stage 111 Manufactured as of January 1, 2008. •The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during take-off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). •EPNL is the level of the time integrai of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone-corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A-weighted decibels. - 6- Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 � � Nighttime All Operations 10:3� p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Repork April 2008 � .t � �.. .., �„ ,.,,,.. � , ,. ,,� �. „ � ��r! �"� ichl�eid k• !' �3�; '� W;� ,.� :;:r:% -, a ��9�'�'f^ , �. ( -�1�°0 � ,� � I� � � �x;:_: � F,` �:.i �: =:; C :.,w,. _ _ _ _� .�. rsr.; r;� � � Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 - 7- Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report April 2008 Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. - $ - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 (` , � � May 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. 200 188 F�:L� u7 C � 140 ':w� � L a� sza ti�: � a 100 � w � ao �, � 60 40 20 a o �r� o �n a tn o tn o�in o tn o �cr o �n o u� o�in o �n o �n o in o u� o �n M`T O ci P'J 'V' O s-1 C+! c1- O s--I M ct O rl M V' O�-1 M'ct O a-i M CY O�-1 C7 C' .. .. .. .. . . . . . . N N M C7 M M O O O O H.-1 �-i .-1 N N N N CT? M t� C"7 �ct '.7- `O' 'c1- � ICJ If7 ICJ N N N N N N O O O O a a O. O O O 6 d Q O � O O O O O O O 4 O 'F'Fi3'e �'' May 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Operations Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 � May 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Operations ; , � , ; � } `; Flight ' f � a � Days of � , ' T�me� /�►1D �'� Carner ' ;` - , j ' ` { ,' � u h ,� , ........... ..._, .�...,.:r , .,.,,..,. .,. s .,Number.... ,. Equipment., .Siage...,.,Operation °+ Routmg. , 22:30 A BAX 705 B72Q H MTWThF YYC MSP TOL 22:31 A Northwest 519 B757 M MTWThFSu LGA MSP 22:31 D Northwest 1268 A319 M MTWThFSu MSP GRB 22:32 A US Airways 3233 E175 M MTWThFS PHL MSP 22:35 A American 598 MD80 M S DFW MSP 22:35 A American 598 MD80 M MTWThFSu MTY DFW MSP 22:35 A Sun Gountry 386 8738 M SSu RSW MSP 22:40 A United 726 8735 M MTWThF DEN MSP 22:40 D Northwest 782 A320 M MTWThFSSu LAS MSP FSD 22:44 A Frontier Airlines 109 A319 M MTWThFSSu QEN M5P 22:50 A American 1411 MD80 M MTWThFSSu EWR ORD MSP 22:52 A US Airways 3233 E175 M Su PHL MSP 22:53 A No�thwest 310 A320 M MTWThFSSu LAX MSP 22:55 A American 2049 B738 M MTWThFSSu MIA MSP 22:55 A Sun Country 242 8738 M MTWThF JFK MSP 22:59 A United 463 6733 M MTWThFSu ORD MSP 23:09 A Northwest 767 A320 M MTWThFSSu DTW MSP 23:09 D UPS O495 8757 M S 23:10 A Midwest Airlines 2833 CRJ M MTWThFSu MKE MSP 23:15 A Sun Country 346 B738 M MThF MCO MSP 23:28 A Delta 1522 MD80 M T ATL MSP 23:30 A Delta 1522 738 M FSu ATL MSP 23:30 A Delta 1522 B73$ M MWThS AT� MSP 23:30 D BAX 705 B72Q H MTWThF YYC MSP TOL 23:46 A US Airways 1074 A319 M MTWThFSSu C�T MSP 23:47 A Con#inental 2$16 E145 M MTWThFSu IAH MSP 23:55 A Sun Country 404 8738 M MTWThFSSu SAN MSP 00:04 A US Airways 359 A319 M MTWThFSSu ONT PHX MSP 00:08 D FedEx 729 MD11 M S 00:15 A Kitty Hawk 772 8733 M TWThF DEN MCI MSP FWA 00:30 A Kitty Hawk 1850 B72Q H S PDX SEA MSP FWA Q0:32 A Airfran 858 B717 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP 00:45 D Kitty Hawk 772 8733 M TWThF DEN MCI MSP FWA 01:15 D Kitty Hawk 1850 672Q H S PDX SEA MSP FWA 03:30 D FedEx 1407 MD11 M ThFS 03:47 A UPS 0552 B757 M TWThF 04:00 D FedEx 1718 MD11 M ThF 04:11 A UPS 0556 A300 M TWThF 04:40 D FedEx 2718 MD11 M S 04:45 D FedEx 1745 A310 M ThF Q5:01 A UPS O496 6757 M T 05:07 A US Airways 290 A320 M MF LAS MSP 05:1$ A UPS 0560 A300 M TWThF 05:18 A UPS 0560 MD11 M ThF 05:26 D Continental 2017 E145 M MTWThF MSP IAH 05:30 D Delta 1061 738 M ThS MSP ATL 05:30 D Deita 1061 8738 M MTFSu MSP ATL 05:30 D Delta 1061 MD80 M W MSP ATL 05:42 A Northwest 362 A319 M SSu SFO MSP 05:42 A Northwest 362 A319 M MTWThF SFO MSP EWR '� �' Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 C May 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Operations ; , � � , Fl�ght� � 2 � ��ws i ,�� t � � Days of ' � r � < < s �. ,`. 'y L4 .i7 �,i � �r � 6 �.n I� ��.. �� i.: f p:'t 71� ,. j � ak ili ��F �, i� }. ; ,Time �! � AlD �, , ; ��. Garner , ... '. ; ! , Numbec , `, . Equipment i ,Stage ey�'„ Operation � , , . , Routm9 .w . .' .: 05:42 A UPS O496 B757 M S 05:43 A Northwest 774 8757 M S LAS MSP 05:43 A Northv�est 774 8757 M MTWThFSu LAS MSP �GA 05:45 A Northwest 154 B757 M MTWThFSSu SEA MSP 05:45 A Northwest 844 8757 M Th ANC MSP BOS 05:47 A Northwest 314 A320 M MTWThFSSu LAX MSP 05:47 A Northwest 844 B757 M Su ANC MSP 05:47 A Northwest 844 8757 M MTWThFS ANC MSP BOS 05:48 A Northwest 1995 E175 M MTWThFS LSE MSP 05:53 A Northwest 808 A333 M MTWThFSSu HNL MSP 05:55 A Northwest 808 A333 M Th HNL MSP 05:55 D Midwest Airlines 2820 GRJ M MTWThFS MSP MKE Report Generated: 05/12(2008 14:10 - 11 - � • ��i •� � . • ' ' �•' . • • •:� � � • • • �� . Total Nighttime Jet Operations by Hour Flo'ur" �:ount� , ,:.:.�.....��..,_ :..... ........�.....:....:.,,............. 2230 .._.._...._623 2300 426 2400 229 100 83 200 22 300 21 400 85 American AAL American AAL America West AWE America West AWE Continental Exp. BTA Compass CPZ Delta DAL Deita DAL Delta DAL. FedEx FDX FedEx FDX FedEx FDX FedEx FDX FedEx FDX Pinnacle FLG Mesaba MES Northwesfi NWA Northwest NWA Northwest NWA Northwest NWA Northwest NWA Sun Country SCX Skywest Airlines SKW Airtran TRS Airtran TRS United UAL United UAL United UA� UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS US Airwavs USA Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 92.1 % of the total nighttime carrier jet operations. -� 2- Reporf Generated: 05/12l2008 14:10 � i ; 350 •• u7 d, 250 yw C49. s.� G7: C: 200 C�' � ca x� +� 150 :Gi � � ."� 10P �Y+ 0 April 2008 Nighttime Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. M d�' 4 a�-1 M V�' O�a�-i M V�' 4 a�-1 M� O w�-1 M V�" O��-I M V'�' O a�-/ M`�G' O a-�i S"Q') C .. .. .. .. .. � . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .' '. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. N N M M P'7 M O O O O ri ct a-1 .-1 N N N N M C"� P'i M ct �t V ct It7 Ii7 LL7 It7 N N N N N N O O O 4 O O O O O O 4 O O O O O O O O O 0 O 4 O April 2008 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines Report Generated: 05/1212008 14:10 - 13 - Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — April 2008 ( Apr 1 thru 8, 2008 — 4296 Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 1 thru 8, 2008 — 4310 Carrier Jet Departures Apr 1 thru 8, 2008 — 383 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 1 thru 8, 2008 — 210 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures � - 14 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks . • - �•- . • � • i/: Apr 9 thru 16, 2008 — 4123 Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 9 thru 16, 2008 — 4103 Carrier Jet Departures ' i Apr 9 thru 16, 2008 — 360 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 9 thru 16, 2008 — 226 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 05/12l2008 14:10 -15- Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — April 2008 �� Apr 17 thru 24, 2008 — 4145 Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 17 thru 24, 2008 — 412$ Carrier Jet Departures C Apr 17 thru 24, 2008 — 311 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 17 thru 24, 2008 —158 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures -16 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — April 2008 Apr 25 thru 30, 2008 — 3031 Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 25 thru 30, 2008 — 3004 Carrier Jet Departures � ; Apr 25 thru 30, 2008 — 214 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Apr 25 thru 30, 2008 —125 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 - 17 - MSP International Airport Remote Monitorinq Tower (RMT) Site Locations , r z`��,� ��: Rerr�ote Monitor6ng Tower �. :: t:-�'�YF_��.� .. - ��- Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 i' (� ) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 � j � � •• ' •i ' • • • � . �� . �• • � � Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. Richfield Wenfworth Ave. & 64th St. Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. Mendota Heights Culion St. & Lexington Ave. Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. Richfield 75th 5t. & 17th Ave. Bloomingfon 16th Ave. & 84th St. Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie i"rail Mendofa Heights End of Kenndon Ave. Eagan Ghapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. Burnsville North River Hills Park Burnsville Red Oak Park Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. Apple Valley Briar 0aks & Scout Pond Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. Eagan 3477 St. Charles PL Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 21:49:27 19:50:52 24:46:52 20:43:18 27:19:52 23:48:05 00:40:24 00:17:39 00:00:44 00:01:35 00:01:32 00:00:09 25:36:04 00:23:47 21:25:54 00:47:27 01:19:39 00:24:56 00:04:06 00:18:27 14:57:34 02:52:28 25:48:38 02:4023 01:53:44 00:14:01 01:41:56 00:03:16 03:38:43 00:01:59 OO:Q1:26 00:00:17 00:03:39 06:04:16 08:53:30 00:02:14 00:00:29 00:01:14 �� • �� t �� li 11 1� �� II II 11 �� -19- • 1 � � . • � � � � � � � � r � � r . � � � • � • Ili f �� , � , ".� � J-� �t„u I 4: y i f < � x�: �� 4 y � rF��:�ii i�l�'� � r� i T�� ri a I i% I��,�.�� k'.�n�: � �. I i� !''�. �� rP J� f � '� J � � � i�. 5r � , � pl i r C t1 1 � G i.i. 4 �n i � i �� i � .t� r� '�i � �� 4 L �� . � � i � � � � ��i�: ,� RMT � , ' �' � � � ,, a r r ^� �? r �� a i T�me:� � T�me > I'T�me > Gr �T�me > 1 b '' it 4: � � � � `' ' 4 , i , , � � , r , �, � � r r � � � i ` " c n� ;,, io��! . T .. �c��f:;�_.. f. '� ..y.' �� _.:� ,. �Acidress' �.� ._.� ..:..t�.;�` r.'. �.._';�.. 65dB . �. ..80d�:. ,a ..�.t_90dB� .._ .:.: �ooas �.:� �.,� ..� .�---. ...........�_ .. . 1 Minneapolis Xences Ave. & 41 st St. 03:43:47 00:02:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 04:29:24 00:02:08 00:00:00 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 10:38:04 00:10:37 00:00:49 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave: & 48ih St. 14:02:10 00:24:5$ 00:00:48 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 40:21:02 03:41:34 00:26:09 00:00:20 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 45:36:47 06:27:16 01:01:44 OO:d0:49 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 84th St. 19:44:25 00:50:13 00:01:29 00:00:00 $ Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 13:19:45 00:33:29 00:00:35 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:09:14 00:00:13 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:22:08 00:01:55 Od:00:39 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:15:31 00:01:43 00:00:36 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:02:56 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 08:05:58 00:02:53 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 09:01:2� 00:20:52 00:00:46 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Gulion St. & Lexington Ave. 12:30:08 00:09:24 00:00:04 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 10:08:31 00:40:37 00:02:54 00:00:00 ' 17 Biaomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:32:51 00:02:34 00:00:18 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 18:08:56 00:24:39 00:01:27 OQ:00:03 19 Bioomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 11:49:57 00:05:21 00:00:06 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:50:55 Q0:00:57 00:00:05 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 02:30:44 00:01:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 02:04:09 00:01:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 18:37:30 �0:56:36 00:04:27 OO:OO:QO 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 05:21:48 00:05:54 OQ:00:01 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 07:22:27 00:00:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 04:05:58 00:01:59 00:00:00 OD:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 09:05:64 00:11:00 00:00:21 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 16fh Ave. S. 31:32:34 00:31:55 00:00:32 00:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 07:14:28 00:05:36 00:0�:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomingkon 8715 River Ridge Rd. 24:59:50 01:32:12 00:03:50 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 02:19:54 00:01:01 00:00:11 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:42:01 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 33 Burnsvil(e North River Hilis Park 02:02:41 00:00:29 OQ:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:30:39 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 03:55:50 00:02:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 01:05:40 00:00:18 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 02:51:52 00:02:26 00:00:01 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 06:15:11 00:04:45 OQ:00:01 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 08:00:20 00:07:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 ''` ' ,, Total Time for D�e arture,Noise Events , ` '364 33 19 ,17 50 36 , �1'47;53 UO 01 �2,;: �� , ` .�. P . �.. , ... ....; z.....; .. .. , . :. . . . . . .. . ..:.. �. . . , . .. , , - 20 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 �� C . l 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Arrival Related Noise Events ' � 11: Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. St. Paul Finn St. & SchefFer Ave. St. Paui Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. Eagan Mendota He Eagan Richfieid Bloomington Richfield Inver Grove Heights Inver Grove Heights Mendota Heights Eagan Inver Grove Hei� Minneapolis Richfield Minneapolis Bloomingfon Bloomington Bloomington Burnsvilie Burnsville cagan Apple Valley Eagan Eagan Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. Culion St. & Lexington Ave. Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 84th St. & 4th Ave. 75fh St. & 17th Ave. 16th Ave. & 84th St. 75th St. & 3rd Ave. Barbara Ave. & 67th 5t. Anne Marie Trail End of Kenndon Ave. Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 6645 16th Ave. S. Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S 8715 River Ridge Rd. 9501 12th Ave. S. 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. North River Hilis Park Red Oak Park 2100 Garnet Ln. Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 3957 Turquoise Cir. 3477 St. Charles PI. Report Generated: 05/12/2005 14:10 4898 4084 4562 4272 4795 4447 145 63 3 5 4 1 5836 76 4217 102 249 85 12 52 3472 745 5658 490 472 56 344 12 976 10 6 2 22 1429 1737 7 2 5 -21 - �'•. ' '' . '• • - � � • ��i v , _ _ _ � �, �� ' !,il , � � � � , ,r � Ka� r, � �� , , 3 k r 4 , � � � Departure ; Departure DeparEure , DeparEure R,MT�' ..� . ' i # r 7 r t� 1 K � � �i G'�� I . k i � � i a �' ,7" ��' � ��' ��I�,i • ry�� 7��., r � �` � , '` y , � ;; n � � i, , 5 � '� k ` � , Euents, > � E�ents > � � Events � � � Events � i • , i ly � i ti v' � i , � � K� a � :: I,D � ...!4..' . � C.. ;f1ty_�..':°.dr� .t � � ,.._..t�. � . � .:._ � ,�.._:�ddress � � � ' .: �' �... . r � ..,65dB :: �` !`��.'.:80dB,_ , ' � a � _90CIB,�, � �: ;.. IOOdBS r : _..� �.. �...... .. .. .�.. ._.. �.; 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 787 19 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 941 28 0 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 1990 104 11 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 2476 208 12 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St, 6088 1427 286 6 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 7192 2618 522 24 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 3181 396 20 p 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St 2176 251 6 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 30 2 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 57 7 6 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 42 7 5 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 12 0 � 0 13 Mendota Heights Soufheast end of Mohican Court 1485 48 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 1395 161 7 0 15 Mendota Heights Culion St. & Lexington Ave. 2112 106 2 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 1426 237 32 Q 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 91 14 , 3 0 18 Rich'field 75fh S#. & 17th Ave. 3376 312 12 2 19 . Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 2272 110 1 0 20 Richfieid 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 155 6 1 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67fh St. 497 1� 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 333 16 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 2757 398 51 0 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 842 73 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 845 7 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 746 24 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S, 1827 122 5 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 4822 399 7 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 1268 62 0 0 30 Bloomingfon 8715 River Ridge Rd. 3750 573 61 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 501 8 2 0 32 Bloomingfon 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 163 3 0 0 33 Burnsviile North River Hills Park 407 5. 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 100 1 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 683 31 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 195 6 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 472 39 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 1000 70 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charies PI. 1425 99 0 0 � ` a ' 4Tofial Depar�ure No�se Events _; ' ; . . 59917 � , 8U14 ' 1052 � ' 32 ,. , :. ,.. .:::. , , .,. ... . ,. ....,.. .... � �� ,.<... , .,:.,. ...,. . ,,.....,:. . - 22 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 C ( j Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP April 2008 (RMT Site#1) Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St., Minneapolis (RMT Site#2) Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis 04/24/200816:16 NWA745 B757 A 04J10/200815:47 NWA1531 DC9Q A 04/10l2008 6:04 CCI706 B72Q A 04/26/200814:36 NWA790 DC9Q D 04/19/200815:34 NWA3 8744 D 04/06/200812:18 NWA129 DC9Q A 04/10/200814:29 AAL682 MD80 A 04120/200819:47 NWA761 DC9Q A Q4/01/200817:21 NWA1560 DC9Q D 04/26/200815:49 NWA3 8744 D (RMT Site#3) West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Min DatelT�me �� Flight Number , Aircraft Type Ar�ivaN � y3. 2 tl vj: I',� � i'` � � i � , ,.� . .,,.;.; , Departure,; ^. _,,.,. .. _„�.. ..,..., ,„ ,.>.,,_ ,.,., ,...., .,,.. , ...:... 04/28/20Q815:29 NWA19 8744 D 04/04/200810:34 CCP420 B72Q D 04/19/200815:15 NWA19 8744 D 04/25/200818:04 NWA9806 8742 D 04/25/200815:27 NWA19 8744 D 04/27/2008 7:00 CCP406 B72Q. D 04121/2008 22:39 DHL197 B72Q D 04/061200818:08 CCP417 B72Q A 04/24/200811:52 NWA447 DC9Q A 04/07/200815:26 NWA19 8744 D Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 12L 12L 12L 30R 30L 12L 12R 12L 30L 30L is 30L 30L 30L 30L 3QL 30L 30L 12R 12R 30L ;. . :. • :. . :� :. :. : • : . : � : � 94.3 94 92.6 92.5 92.3 91.9 91.4 91.2 91.2 91.1 -23- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP April 2008 04/18/2008 11:21 04/24/2008 16:16 04/11 /2008 17:19 04/11 /2008 11:39 04/25/2008 12:10 04/04J200$ 14:34 04/25/2008 14:31 04/18/2008 17:35 04/13/2008 15:08 04118/2008 $:58 04104/2008 10:34 04/12/2008 10:07 04/19/2008 8:17 04/13/2008 6:59 04/16/20Q8 11:13 04/12/2008 8:21 04/19/2Q08 15:14 04/18/2008 6:25 04/18/2008 11:56 04118/2008 11:16 (RMT Site#4) Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis NWA768 DC9Q D NWA745 8757 A NWA746 DC9Q D NWA750 DC9Q D NWA750 DC9Q D NWA766 DC9Q D NWA766 DC9Q D NWA746 DC9Q D NWA19 B744 D NWA752 DC9Q D (RMl" Site#5) 12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis CGP420 GCP422 CCP412 CCP406 N WA454 CCP412 N WA19 CCP420 N WA452 N WA454 30R 12� 35 35 30L 30L 30L 30R 35 30L 30L 30L 3QL sa� 30L 30� 30L 3QL 30L 30L 95.1 93.1 92.7 92.7 92.4 92.2 92.2 91.7 91.2 91.1 1042 102.5 102.4 101.1 101 100.8 99.6 99.2 99.1 98.6 - 24 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 C Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Aprii 2008 (RMT Site#7) Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield 04/12/2008 14:33 04/24/2008 23:14 04/07/2008 22:37 04/25/2008 20:35 04/24J200$ 22:32 04/11/2008 22:46 04/28/2008 16:02 04/09/2008 9:38 04/04/2008 10:25 04/12/2008 11:46 04/10/2008 15:34 04/11/2008 15:54 04/06l2008 9:11 04/17/2008 15:21 04/10l2008 6:49 04121/20d8 21:10 04/26I2008 7:26 04/10/2008 6:52 04/11/2008 7:45 04/21/2008 20:31 (RMT Site#8) Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis CCP600 CCI2705 DHL197 NWA1472 DHL197 DHL197 AAL2337 N WA752 NWA1202 N WA750 Sa NWA19 NWA19 NWA133 NWA19 BMJ62 N WA620 BMJ48 BMJ66 BMJ62 N WA618 Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 � � : � � •e : * : � u�:� DC9Q . � � DC9Q D (RMT Site#9) a St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul � .. ; .. . � � .. : :� � •� : :� : :� : :� � •R � . � . ; .� .� .� ;.. :• : :• :• . 87.8 80.5 79 77.1 75.5 75.3 74.5 74.4 73.8 73.7 -25- Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP April 2008 (RMT Site#10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul 04/3012008 15:20 04/11 /2008 15:54 0411 7/2008 1 5:21 04/12/2008 15:38 04/01 /2008 15:23 04/21/2008 2030 04/10(2008 15:34 04/26/2008 7:26 04/21 /2008 21:10 04/10/2008 20:23 NWA19 NWA19 N WA19 NWA19 N WA19 N WA61 E NWA19 BMJ48 NWA62C N WA46 (RMT Sife#11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul B744 8744 8744 8744 B744 DC9Q B744 V C C 0 0 0 � � � A�� ` � �� ' i— ' • : '• I��• � ' - 26 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 C ( , Top Ten �oudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP April 2008 (RMT Site#13) Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendata Heights (RMT Site#14) �4/05/2008 17:19 04/04/2008 7:26 04/16/2008 6:12 04/05/2008 21:44 04/02/2008 22:15 04/17/2008 19:1$ 04/21I2008 6:15 04/03/2008 22:41 04/25/2008 8:02 04/24/2008 20:25 (RMT Site#15) Cullon St. & Lexington Ave., Mendota Heights N WA790 BMJ48 AAL756 NWA143 NWA867 AAL 1192 AAL756 VWA1469 N WA619 AAL1191 Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 � • t�; : :� �:� � • t� r •e �:� �:� � •E � • t� r:� 12L 12L 12L 12L 12L 12� 12L 12L 30L 12L � .� . :: • : • � � m :. :. :. -27- Top Ten �oudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP C (RMT Site#16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane, Eagan 04/15/2008 15:19 04/22/2008 15:15 04/1012008 19:49 04/02/2008 15:12 04/10/2008 20:38 04/03/2008 15:21 04/0612008 15:26 04110/2008 20:25 04/24/2008 15:24 04/10/2008 6:36 N WA19 NWA19 NWA1701 NWA19 NWA135 NWA19 NWA19 NWA1461 NWA19 BMJ64 (RMT Site#17) 84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington 8744 D 6744 D DC9Q -._.........---A 8744 D DC9Q A B744 D 8744 D DC9Q A B744 D BE80 D (RMT Site#18) 75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfieid 22 22 04 22 22 22 04 22 22 94.1 93.1 91.7 91.3 89.9 89.8 89.4 87.7 87.6 86.9 - 28 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 (� ) Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP (RMT Site#19) 16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloomington (RMT Site#20) 75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield 04/20/2008 15:20 04/02/2008 19:50 04/02/2008 21:24 04/14/2008 15:41 04/Q6J2008 5:37 04/06/2008 21:23 04/23/2008 15:26 04/03/2008 22:23 04/02/2008 22:40 04/14/2008 11:28 (RMT Site#21) Barbara Ave. & 67th St., Inver Grove Heiqhts N WA19 N WA9844 NWA1203 NWA139 DAL1488 NWA145 NWA19 DHL197 CC1705 N WA611 Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 : .. : � � • t� � •� �:i � •R ; .. � : e = _� 85.4 84.2 83.4 $2.4 82.1 82 81.9 81.8 81.8 81.7 .'� Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP April 2008 04/04/2008 10:16 04/05/20�8 6:01 04/16/2a08 8:23 04/25/2008 10:06 04/22/2008 5:54 04/16l2008 10:12 04/11/2008 21:21 04/21 /2008 10:42 04/29/2008 15:07 04/05/2008 13:19 04/04I2008 13:14 04/15/2008 9:04 04/14/2008 14:28 04/03/2008 22:41 04/10/2008 14:53 04/03/2008 14:24 04/06/2008 10:31 04/24/2008 15:34 04/14/2008 11:33 04J02I2008 22:14 04/05/2008 6:00 04/06/2008 7:09 04/2512008 8:01 04/26/2008 7:49 04/16/2008 8:22 04120/2008 6:49 04IO2/2008 8:13 04/04/2008 15:48 04/04/2008 13:54 04/05/2008 5:44 (RMT Site#22) Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heights N WA437 CCP410 CCP412 NWA1491 CC11706 DAL145$ N WA445 NWA454 NWA19 DAL1239 � : t� � � •� � �:� � •e � •e � .. i��:� (RMT Site#23) End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota N WA447 NWA752 NWA790 NWA1469 N WA790 N WA790 N WA716 NWA790 N WA750 N WA867 CCP410 CCP406 N WA619 AAL1017 CCP412 CCP406 CCP412 N WA449 NWA558 DAL 1488 Cha 1'�f4L �_.� '�1� r •e � �:� � '�� '�� '�� • 1� � , . � �:� � 12L 12L 12L 12L 12L 12L 12L 12L 12L 12L 12R 12R 3QL 30R 12R 12R 12R 3QL 30� 12R 89.9 85.6 85.5 84.6 84.1 83.2 83.2 82.9 82.1 81.9 95.3 94.7 94.6 94.6 94.2 94.1 94 94 93.9 93.9 ;.. :• :: • :: :: � :: :. . :• • :. : � - 3� - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 C C Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP April 2008 04/01/2008 10:06 04/09/2008 22c29 04/10/2008 23:55 04/04/2008 15:49 04/06/2008 15:27 04/15l2008 22:18 04/23/2008 22:23 04/29/2008 14:52 04/11l2008 0:40 04/24/2008 17:26 (RMT Site#25) Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd., N WA643 DHL197 CGI705 N WA449 NWA19 QHL197 DHL197 AA�1154 DHL197 NWA458 (RMT Site#26) ., :� : • � : : � : : :� . :� � (RMT Site#27) Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S., Minneapolis Report Generafed: 05l12/2008 14:10 - 31 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Aprii 2008 (RMT Site#28) 6645 16th Ave. S., Richfield (RMT Site#29) Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31st Ave. S., Minneapolis 04/17/2008 21:51 04/20/2008 11:19 04/21 l2008 17:11 04/05/2008 16:05 04/09/2008 19:52 04/21 /2008 11:24 04/24/2008 14:38 04/24/2008 13:24 04/20/2008 18:42 04/20/2008 14:33 (RMT Site#30) 8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington N WA454 NWA136 CCP9414 NWA1675 NWA1527 N WA1745 N WA1068 NWA1533 NWA766 . . � •� � •� �:i(i.i � • t� � •� � •� � • t� � •� � • t� 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 96.5 95 94.6 94.5 94.2 93.5 93.3 93:3 93.3 93.3 - 32 - Repo�f Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 C � C � 1 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP Ap�il 2008 04106/2008 15:26 04/24/2008 15:24 04/21 /2008 15:25 04/24/2008 13:34 04129/2008 22:07 04/05(2008 13:41 04/15/2008 15:09 04/21/2008 19:35 04/21 /2008 19:49 04/04/2008 13:56 NWA19 NWA19 NWA19 AAL 1905 NWA1025 CCP9422 N WA779 NWA1535 N WA876 AAL2034 (RMT Site#31) 9501 12th Ave. S., Bloomi ; „ ; .. ; .. �:� � � . � � • t► � •� �:� (RMT Site#32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomington 92.4 91.1 86.4 83.3 82.4 82.3 81.3 81.3 79.8 79.6 (RMT Site#33) North River Hills Park, Burnsville Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 - 33 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP (RMT Site#34) Red Oak Park, Burnsville 04/02/2008 17:35 04/22/2008 14:06 04/04/2�0$ 15:Q5 04/01 /2008 23:17 �4/04/2008 7:08 041Q5/2008 9:05 04/21 /2008 17:12 04116/2008 11:50 04/2012008 13:35 04/01 /2008 22:35 NWA136 SCX702 CCP9418 CC1705 AAL2247 N WA752 NWA136 (RMT Site#35) 2100 Garnet Ln., E� DC9Q B738 B72Q r:� � • t�: AAL1258 MDSO D AAL1905 MD80 D DHL197 B72Q D (RMT Site#36) Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, Apple Valley 17 35 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 84.4 84.3 84.3 � 83.8 83.6 83.3 83.2 82.8 - 34 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP April 2008 (RMT Site#37) 4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan 04/04/20�$ 7:37 CCP9416 04/06J2008 9:19 CCP9416 04/05/2008 9:11 AA�1112 04/02/200817:41 NWA458 04/14/200816:19 NWA1465 04123/2008 22:05 FDX1106 04l14/200817:45 AAL1955 04/03/2008 22:03 FDX1106 04/15/200811:50 NWA452 04/04/2008 7:52 NWA1428 04/06/2008 9:18 04/04/2008 7:37 04/291200810:37 PGE348 � � 04/20/200811:31 AAL1683 04/04/200813:35 NWA1068 04105/200810:33 NWA1426 04/24/200817:47 AAL1955 04I23/2008 7:44 GCP9412 04l05/2008 9:41 AAL1362 04/06I200811:53 AAL1447 04/05/200814:03 AA�360 04/06l200818:45 AAL429 --.._......._._.... 447 04 03/200$ 12:00 AAL1 04/29/2008 9:34 AAL1359 04/29/200814:35 AA�2337 2:12 AAL1447 4:10 AAL1154 � : t� � ��:;zz��:' � �:� �' � 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 1 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 872 86.5 84.4 84 83.8 89.8 87 85.4 84.9 84.6 84.6 84.3 84.3 83.9 83.9 April 2008 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for April 2008 were comprised of 87.9% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft iype was the DC9Q with 34.1 °/a of the highest Lmax events. � � April 2008 Technical Advisor Reoort Notes Unknown fields are due to unavailability of FAA flight track data. Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the month of April 2008. Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 -35- Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL April 2008 �. Remote Monitoring Towers ' Date � a #'1 ' #2 #3,� ' #4' � `#5 �: #6�� r ` #7 �'#8 w #9 �#10 #11 ��`#12� #13 #'F4 #15 ...,,.. .�...�!:...0 t .. .��.x; ..,a.�F.� � . w.,.:��: .:�..�.�.:. �.�.._, � L .:i ; e.,,J . : 7�...c � � ,..��.�. 7 C 1 � a ,.. i- r . � � �'�' dw. .�E I 04/01/2Q08 54.9 56 59.7 60.9 68.8 74.3 65.3 62.7 31.5 53.2 51.3 NA NA 61.7 43.3 04/d2/2008 58.4 61 64.4 62.1 682 68.3 40.5 41.5 NA NA 36.8 NA 61.$ 63.1 62.3 04/03/2008 58.4 61.7 64.3 63.4 69.1 69.8 45.5 49.1 26.9 NA 36 26.3 59.3 62.4 62.5 04/04J2008 57.1 58.3 64.2 62.2 70.3 71.1 55.2 57.7 NA 29 32.6 NA 56.5 65.9 59 04/05/2008 59.9 61.8 66.2 62.3 69.8 69.3 NA 27.9 31.4 30.9 NA 32.4 57.9 65.7 60.8 04/Q6/200$ 60.4 61.5 66.4 63.2 70.2 73.4 54.2 56.5 44.8 40.8 NA NA 58.3 61.6 59 04/07/2008 55 53.6 58.7 60.2 70.5 74.4 66.7 64.8 NA NA NA NA 45.8 60.7 43.8 04/08/2008 55.3 56.1 59.8 63.5 71.2 75.6 64.4 64.5 NA NA NA NA 42.7 60.6 41.1 04/09/2008 56.2 57.7 62.7 60.7 69.3 71.4 61.6 58.5 NA 34.1 NA 27.2 54.2 63.7 59.9 04/1012008 64.6 65.6 6$.9 65.3 72.3 70.5 51.1 46.7 50.1 55 49.9 46.8 56.2 62.2 61.9 04/11 /2008 62.3 62.3 68.1 65 73.5 74.5 64.9 63.4 43.7 55 53.9 43.4 52.9 64.1 58.1 04/12/2008 51.3 52.8 58.5 60.4 69.8 72.6 64.1 61.4 NA 53.8 52.1 NA NA 60.2 49.5 04/1312008 51.9 51.9 56.7 59.4 71.1 72.6 62.5 61.3 37.3 NA NA NA NA 56.2 NA 04/14/2008 56.8 59.4 63.8 61.5 68.1 67.3 43.6 47.8 NA NA NA 33 57.6 64 59.9 04/15/200$ 60.9 61.3 67.4 63.1 71.1 69.1 40.1 41.9 NA NA NA 26.5 59.7 60.5 62.6 d4116/200$ 60.5 59.5 66.5 62.1 72 72.3 61.9 62.5 NA 41.2 NA 32.3 58.8 62.7 62.1 Q4/17/2008 56.4 56.7 63.4 61.4 70.2 71.8 65.8 62.3 42.9 54.8 522 31.9 53.6 61.6 56.4 04/18/2008 55.2 53.6 62.6 62.6 72.6 72.5 66.3 62.1 38.1 40.7 33.9 NA 50.3 64.5 52.3 04/19/2005 54.1 55.6 59.8 62 70.4 74.5 62.6 63.1 NA NA NA NA NA 59.4 27 04120/2008 57.8 60.6 64.2 62.2 68.9 69.3 58.4 54.6 NA 28.6 NA 44.8 58.1 66 59.7 04/21/2008 60.8 62.1 66.8 63.9 72.2 72.3 62.6 55.4 38.7 37.9 45.9 NA 56.7 60.7 59.4 04/22l2008 52.1 53.4 57.5 60.4 69.7 72.9 64 63.5 32 28 35.6 36.7 39.4 61.4 36 04/2312008 61.3 58:7 64.8 60.2 69 68.7 50.4 49.9 NA 39 30.7 NA 59.1 60.5 60.6 04/24/2008 61.4 62.5 68.3 65.6 73.1 75.4 57.1 65 44.4 44.2 44.5 46.9 56.1 64.5 59.2 04I25/2008 54.5 55.7 60.6 62.8 72.4 75.6 64.1 63.9 NA NA NA NA 42.2 62.4 47.1 04/26/2008 53.9 53.2 57.9 58.5 68 70.8 62.3 58.6 36.8 38.6 40.1 NA 42.4 63.8 44.5 04/27/2008 50.9 53.9 57.8 58.9 68.6 72.8 62.5 60.6 39.5 NA 40:2 NA NA 59.8 37.3 04/28/2008 57.1 54.6 57.5 60.2 68.9 73.7 63.8 64.8 33.9 NA NA 30.6 NA 58.5 41.8 04/29/2008 60.7 59.5 64.2 60.9 68.4 66.9 44.5 26.5 39.8 NA NA 46.6 57.9 63.8 60.7 04/30/2008 60.9 62.1 66 62.8 70.2 69 48.4 42.5 NA 49.9 52.5 NA 57.3 63.2 60.5 tVlo DNL ' 58 � 59 5 64 3 62 3 70� G 72 4 61 9 60' 7'39 3 47 2 45 6 38' 4 55 7 62 i 58 4: ,: � .,.�..:..... , ,.;...,,, ,. , ,:, ,. ,... ,� .�,,.,u . .,�,. . ,.,.<...,. ...-,, . . _:::... ._�. � .. . ............ - 36 - Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 �� C Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL April 2008 Remote Manitoring Towers 04101/2008 67.7 37.3 57.7 55.1 46.2 38.9 58.3 52.4 62.5 46.7 45.6 56.8 62.7 57.5 04/02/2008 63.8 50.9 61.6 57.4 39.8 58.2, 57.8 68.6 59.9 55.2 58.7 68.1 56.2 NA 04/03/2008 63.9 49.6 62.1 58.9 38.3 56.8 56.9 68.5 59.4 54.6 5S 50.5 60.5 49.8 04/04/2008 68.3 49.3 57.9 55.7 48.4 53 60.4 67.7 63.8 52.6 59.1 52.6 55.7 53.3 04/05/20Q8 66.8 NA 582 55.8 NA 48.6 58.6 66.3 62.3 53.5 57.1 43.2 53.5 NA 04I06/2008 63.6 49.7 61.9 56.8 46.4 53.6 55.1 64.4 59.2 52.8 58.6 47.3 60.9 56.1 04/07/2008 65.7 NA 47.7 25.6 47.7 37 58.4 53 61.6 44.3 46.5 56.8 62.6 59 04/08/2008 65.9 26.9 43.5 28.7 45.7 40.3 59 53.9 61.2 44.2 43.7 58.5 62.3 58 04/09/2008 68.5 49 572 57.3 36.2 51.2 59.1 66 63.1 58.4 60.1 54.6 58.9 58 04/10/2008 67.4 61.8 60.3 57 43.1 49.2 51.4 66 57.4 58.2 51.2 45.4 60.7 47.8 04/12/2008 65.5 NA 46.3 48 39.4 NA 58.7 45.3 61 44.5 42.3 57.7 60.4 54.4 04/13/2008 62.2 41.9 47 42.3 45.6 36.1 52.7 36.1 56.5 39.3 38.9 59.3 58.3 55.6 04/14/2008 63.4 43.8 59.3 54.4 46 52.2 54.1 66.7 6Q 52.6 59.5 41.7 55.7 42.5 04/15/2008 60.3 52.7 63.3 56.2 40.2 54.7 52.1 67.4 57 55.4 58.3 34.9 61.3 30.7 04/16/2008 65.6 47 57.8 51.4 47.9 55.2 57 65.9 60.3 49.3 56.9 54.2 62.1 60.6 j j 04/17/2008 65.1 47 61.3 58.3 48.9 51.1 55.9 60.8 60.8 53.6 53.8 55.5 62.1 53.2 04/18/2008 66.5 40.5 50.8 42.9 37.6 49.9 58 57.9 61.5 57.3 56.9 61.6 60.6 54.2 04/19/2008 64.4 NA 31 NA 40.3 37.1 56.3 47.4 59.3 43.3 44.9 57.5 59.5 55.8 04/20/2008 65 NA 59.1 56.6 NA 50.3 53.2 66.1 59.7 53 56.1 55.4 60.3 39.6 04/21 /2008 63.3 49.3 61.1 58 54.1 54.1 59.4 63.4 58.7 48 54.8 55.9 64.7 54.4 04/22/2008 66.9 51.7 58 542 49.7 51.8 59.9 48.9 61.6 43.5 45.9 56 61.3 59.5 04/23/2008 63.2 50.7 62.5 57.9 45.3 55 54.7 64.8 58:4 57.6 57.9 37.7 63.6 44.3 Q4/24/2008 65.2 48.5 61.4 56.9 41.7 52.9 55.5 64.2 59.8 49.4 53 56.7 61.3 49.8 04I2512008 68.3 NA 39.6 31.5 34.4 NA 58.9 51.6 62.4 50.6 44.9 59.9 61.9 59.2 04/26/200$ 67.8 41.8 46.8 35.6 48.8 43.4 61.2 53.6 63.7 40.3 53,5 56.6 61.6 56.8 04/27/2008 64.6 49.8 51.7 5Q.5 51.4 28.4 56.8 47 59.9 40.3 40.8 57.5 59.4 55.2 04/28/2008 63.5 48.8 55.2 53.1 45.5 43.6 55 44.3 58.3 39.6 46.1 57.1 612 58.4 04/29/2008 65.3 26.7 58.4 55 35.4 53.5 55.7 66.1 60.6 56 58.4 40.6 54.7 32.3 04/30/2008 63.7 NA 60.2 57 31.2 53.4 54.2 65.4 59.4 53.3 57.8 38.5 61.6 27.3 Report Generated: 05/12/2008 14:10 g� i- � - Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL Apri1 2008 (- Remote Monitoring Towers �� D$te � #30l #37 � #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 ;#37, � #38 �#39�';i :� . �.�.._,'.� s.�s,....>. �.>. �_..,.� �.,.,;,.,, ,4.�.� ..' .�,�..��_.' .�.�,..� ��C, v,,,.. �....t � � ,,,.d.i;� . 9 � �yo-�,,.E 04/01/2008 65.3 47.4 46.5 372 29.9 59.7 57.1 42 43.2 NA 04/02/2008 64.3 49.3 40.8 49.3 38.5 48.7 34.7 49.9 55.2 57.5 04/03/2008 67.2 51.7 42.5 49.3 52.2 54.3 50.4 57.2 59.6 58.$ 04/04/2008 65.4 50.3 47.6 57.8 49.6 55.8 49.8 52.3 53.6 50.9 04/05/2008 63.9 47.4 39.3 50.2 28.8 48.2 28.2 52.1 55.8 55.1 04/06/2008 63.9 53.4 44.6 47.9 45.2 50.1 46.1 51.3 54.2 56 04/07/2008 48.9 NA NA NA NA 52.1 54.8 NA NA NA 04/08/2008 49.5 33.8 42.8 NA 36.5 53.1 56.1 37.3 NA NA 04/09I2008 63.3 44.3 40.7 45.2 41.2 54.1 56.6 46.6 49.7 50.5 04/10/2008 60.6 47.7 42.7 33.1 41 47.3 40.9 46.2 50.7 47.7 04/11/2008 45.7 38.3 49.3 NA NA NA 27.7 27.5 NA 32.1 04/12i200$ 48.7 38.4 NA NA NA 51.4 54.1 NA NA NA 04i13/2008 45.7 30.4 42 NA 39.1 50 53.4 NA NA NA 04/14/2008 62 43.1 34.5 47.1 30.6 49.3 32.4 51.2 52.9 54.3 04/15/2008 62.1 51.3 51.4 45.4 36.7 51.2 36.9 49.5 52.8 58.3 04/16/2008 59.3 44.3 45.8 48.7 46 55.5 56 47.3 49.7 53.9 04117/2008 66 48 44.5 48.5 51.5 57.6 57.3 60.1 52.3 58 04/1$/2008 51.4 NA 32.1 38.1 34.1 54.9 57.5 38 37.4 27.9 04/19/2008 38.8 NA NA NA NA 40 43.3 NA NA NA 04/20i2008 65 44.6 44 47.2 28.8 49 42.2 50.8 55.4 54.9 04/21 /2008 64 51.2 41.6 45.3 38.6 51.8 50.5 49.2 52.1 54.9 04/22/2008 62.5 40.2 29.7 44.7 37.$ 58.4 58.3 44.4 39.9 NA 04/23/2008 64.7 45.7 38.2 48.6 37.1 53.5 44.8 55.6 57.1 55.9 04/24/2008 64.6 52.9 46.2 47.6 41.3 52.4 49.5 53.4 52.9 55.9 04/25l2008 31.7 31.5 39.2 NA NA NA NA 30.9 31.1 40.9 04/26/2008 38.7 NA 49 NA NA 24.4 28.9 NA NA NA 04/27/2008 59.4 46.4 40.1 47 37.5 54.3 55.1 43.1 40.9 28.3 04/28/2008 60.5 46.8 42.8 44.7 44.6 55.1 56.1 NA NA 35.5 04J29/2008 63 51.1 34.3 462 40.8 50.3 44.3 51.9 54.4 55 04/30/2008 65.6 47.8 42 42.2 NA 50.6 49.1 51.8 53.7 56.3 .r.� � m� n � : _ . , .. � .�.�. . ; Y. Mo DNL 62 4 4? 5 44 47 3 43 1' S� 3 52 8 49 6^ 52" 53�2' y ��n..��...: ��,. .'.,, .,.._:.,.�.. . �..:..� ,....,;,• ..,,:.�...... ., a,�.,,. ;. .. .. ,.:�::�_:. - 38 - Report Generated: 05l12l2008 14:10 r �� .•��-c.»T�i��z.��:r�rrl:��.� 1.►i1�i�L•7 ��: TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, City Administr SUBJECT: Review 2008 Plan Of Action DISCUSSIC?N: The Airport Relations Commission last reviewed the Plan of Action at their March meeting and attached is a copy of the Plan of Action with the changes made from that meeting. Review the 2008 Plan of Action, make any final revisions and if acceptable pass a motion adopting it. l�_ �� /.f�/�,��- .r �� 200 � Ai o� No��e , � .. Plan of A�ti�n . ._, . . .� . IVlendota Helghts Airport Relations Commission - 1 - 4/3/08 en ota Heights Airport Relations Comnussion is charged with monitoring proposed t r les, procedures, and programs and advising the City Council on matters {" �' to airport noise and operations. In an effort to mitigate airport uoise in the � � a Heights community and assure equity of the current runway use system, the � ission has given high priority to the following issues: ,� �� Hi�h Priority Issues r M°f� �r`�SPa�Qc-h � 2. �` b�'e IN�� M� rer.s 1- • 3.�h poX�' °� �fer� ' od°�� a�, � d��`J` 2. Monitor Adherence to the environmental impact statement for Runway 17-35. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Continue efforts to keep planes in the air corridor over Mendota Heights. Continue input a.nd dialog with the MSP Noise Oversighi Committee (NOC). Review Residential land use in Mendota Heights, particularly developable parcels that may be affected by airport noise. Monitor Nighttime restrictions on aircraft operations Advocate for Conversion from hush kitted to Manufactured Stage III and Stage N aircraft. � Encourage use of non-simultaneous departure procedures. Develop a relationship with FAA representatives and legislative leaders regarding airport issues. � Provide oversight of 2020 Plan Assess Anoms Locations Monitor Continuous Descent Approach for any collateral positive effects to Mendota Heights Other issues that will rectuire continued monitorin�: , l. 2. 3. 4. 5. Monitor/Support ongoing lawsuits to require greater sound abatexnent measures. Heighten awareness and communication of Mendota Heights noise concerns. Promote standard insttvment departures and final approaches .through the use of global positioning satellites to keep planes from flying over residential areas of the City. Monitor correspondence and new information on international noise mitigation efforts. Monitor correspondence between Rogers Lake East Noise Reduction Comrnittee and MAC. � 4/3/08 f� � � Issue #1: Provide Legislative oversight of the MAC Action Steps: Who: When: 1 2. 3 Establish strong relationship with legislators and airport ;,. Staff/AR.0 continuous off'icials � �; ,• ' ' _ -�C.�n�1C�s�►��s : , ,. . . . .... Monitor e�y for proposed changes to MA struct�%� and method of appointments: Testify as necessary on MAC/airport legislation Staff/ARC as necessary Issue #2: Monitor adherence to the environmental impact statement for Runway. 17-35. Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Monitor data and information regarding the use and impact of new runway 17-35 in the technical advisors report and its conformance to the EIS. mon; �br 2. ' data regarding runway 17-35 use (staying under 9.3%) on parallel ARC/Staff ARC/Staff 3. Communicate reaciion to the analysis of 17-35 completion ARC/Staff 4. Review tower operations with MAC staff for 17-35 ARC/Staff effects. � 5. Morutor MAC/FAA accommodations to communities ARC/Staff affected by 17/35 operations for consistency with treatment of Mendota Heights and adherence to EIS �ssue #3: Contiaaue efforts to keep planes in ti�e air corridor over IVgendota I3eights as avail monthly as avail as avail as appropriate Action Steps: Who: When: l. Monitor flight data to ensure adherence to corridor ARC/Staff monthly Issue #4: Continue input and dialog with the MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) Action Steps: Who: Wlien: 1. Monitoz activities and processes of MSP Noise Oversight AR.0 monthly Committee , ,, : , 2. Conduct regular meetings with NOC representatives and ARC/NOC as:needed ARC to identify issues that can be advocated 6i� 3. Work collaboratively with other communities+,Q�t mutual co erns as regards to airport "development and operations. � x - 3 - 4/3/08 Issue #5: Review residential land use in Mendota Heights, particularly developable parcels that may be affected by airport noise. 1 �J�l�te � ?5 Q�f��,� �S 2. Provide recormnendations to the City Council for development rezoning and or acquisition of these sites. 3. ��,eu� Per�►�7'/�14nn��9l ��'f�, +�' l�all application materials submitted s�s. W�r{h�� i'�Qor� ,ryD`45�- Zon+�S . Who: ARC/Staff ARGStaff Staff Issue #6: Monitor nighttime restrictions on aircraft operations As apps are filed As apps are filed As apps are filed 0 Action SteAs: Who: When: 1. Have NOC representative lobby for further restrictions on Nighttime operations (preferred nighttime headings) ARC%NOC ongoing 2. Monitor legal precedent/litigation concerni.ng noise ARC continuous level averaging 3. Monitor night depariure trends /�RC' m�� Issne #7: Advocate for conversion from hush kiited to Manufactured Stage III and Stage IV aircraft. Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Determine when phase out of hush kitted aircraft ARC/Staff as appropriate will occur. 2. Advocate for incentives/penalties program for Stage IlI A.RC/Staff compliance by airlines 3. Determine what constitutes a Stage IV aircraft and when ARC/Staff conversion to Stage N will occur Issue #� '' `8ri �/' �f" 6� ISA'� ro ��veS �P�frV p/ �G�� S �/'�5�.�.( '�5 l. Monitor�.��r�oP use of non s�m„1r�nP^�,.�� ..� �� t24- � l�-f� � ARC/Staff as appropriate as avail When: as appropriate � �� 4/3/08 Issue #9: Develop a relationship with FAA. representatives and legislative leaders regarding airport issues Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Invite Senator Metzen and Rep. Hansen to a regular ARC Staff/ARC Meeting. Encourage Senator Metzen and Rep. Hansen to have Mac Board elected. 2. Invite Tower Operator Carl Rydeen to an ARC meeting StafflARC 3. Invite MAC Commissioner Tom Foley to an AR.0 meeting Staff/ARC Issue #10: Provide Oversight of 2020 Plan Annually Annually Annually Action Steps: Who: When: 1. Identify effects of 2020 Plan on MH 2. Work proactively with other Cities to require MAC to address and minimize adverse effects of implementing 2020 Plan ARC/Staff ARC/Staff 3. Work to require MAC's expanded use of reliever airports ARC/Siaff Issaae #��: Assess �o�as I.oea#ioaas l. Work with NOC to determine if noise monitors are at the ARC/Staff best locations, are they moveable, is technology updated ongomg ongoing ongomg ongomg A Issue #12: 1V�onitor CD� Uther Issnes To Be Monitored: . t m�at�m'�s. Issue #2: Heighteu awareness and communication of Mendota Heights noise concerns. Issue #3: Promote standard instrument departures and final approaches through the use � of global positioning satellites to keep planes from flying over residential areas of the Ciiy. Issue #4: Monitor correspondence and new information on international noise mitigation efforts Issue #5: Monitor correspondence between �� V6�5� ��i�c�o�v� andMAC.�� b�V" �Dt,,�►��i �� i�P.osG�t�s �lc - 5 - 4/3/08 �. C Minutes of Meeting and Tour — May 19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Corrections on page 2 1 Council Member Krebsbach asked when the RNAV would be put into use. Mr. Rydeen quoted September 24 but said only 65% of aircraft will be compatible at that time. He briefly described the system (which takes the place of heading navigation) and said it will increase potential for aircraft to be more precise and efficient and provide a predictable track. The goal is to work with Northwest in creating and publishing procedures for the new system and then coordinate them between the tower and pilots. Mr. Rydeen said that he would like to utilize the system for daytime as well as initial nighttime use. Council Member Krebsbach commented on inequitable use of the two 12s. Mr. Rydeen reported that 12L night-time 2007 annualized flights were forecasted at 14.1 % and came in at 19.5%. He reiterated that runway choice is determined according to efficiency and safety and said the biggest issue is runway incuxsion. Discussion ensued. Mr. Leqve, responding to a question about the possible Northwest Airlines-Delta merger, stated that growth opportunities are anticipated at MSP and Detroit for international destinations and gates. Mr. Rydeen addressed questions submitted in advance by ARC concerning out-of- corridor excursions (does not believe it is pilot error), wheels down (seeks standardization), RUS update, crossing the corridor update, runway selection (determined by ground controller according to destination, adding that separation occurs on the ground), radio recording of pilot-tower conversations (doesn't wa.nt the pilot to be a controller or noise expert; if a problem or anomaly is identified, for instance, by Mendota Heights and it can be fixed, he will do something about it if he is able; and Chair Petschel commented that she is interested more in trends versus individual occurrences), and conformance to FEIS. Responding to a question posed at the meeting, he reported that MSP ATCT is fully staffed and many new employees coming in are very highly qualified after completing their training at the North Dakota facility. The group then took a tour of the control tower and radar room. Adiourn The tour was completed at 6:30 p.m. and the group returned to City Hall. YTpcomin� 1Vleetin�s • MAC Meeting — May 19, 2008 —1:00 p.m. � City Council Meeting — May 20, 2008 — 7:30 p.m. • NOC Meeting — May 21, 200$ —1:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ( i Mary Heintz " TimeSaver Off Szte Secretarzal, Inc. 0 _ C Coa�rectyoms on pages 1, S, 6 CI�'Y OF MM�NI)OTA I3EIG�ITS IDAKO'�A COUNTY, MINN]ESOTA AI12I'ORT I�ELA'I'IONS COMIVIISSION MINUTES April 9, 2008 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, Apri19, 2008, at 7:00 p.m., in the Large Conference Room at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. The following Commissioners were present: Liz Petschel, Chair; Bi11 Dunn, Sally Lorberbaum, Ken Reed, and Dave Sloan, Commissioners. Guests: Mike Heide and Mike Kosel, Rogers Lake Group. A1so present were: Jim Danielson, City Adiniiiistrator; John Bergman, Apple Valley Noise Oversight Committee Alternate; and Mary Heintz, Recorder. Not Present: Robin Ehrlich, Vice Chair; Lyle Odland, Commissioner; Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to Mr. Danielson. Approval of Minutes Chair Petschel requested a spelling correction to "Senator Metzen" on page one, second paragraph under Review/Update Goals and Objectives. A motion was made by Commissioner Lorberbaum, seconded by Commissioner Dunn, to approve the March 12, 2008, ARC meeting minutes as amended. The minutes were approved. Un�nished and New Business A. Presentation by Guy Heide and Milce Kosel, Rogers Lake Group Mr. Guy Heide distributed a copy of the final draft report of the MAC Environmental Assessment for the Runway 4-22 Extension. He said the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reasoning for redirecting traffic at night over the Mendota Heights corridor is because fewer residences are located there, which is untrue, and commented that Eagan had pressured the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) to work on the FA.A to do so. Chair Petschel stated that the measure had passed by only one vote at that time and that industry representatives and the Northwest Airlines representative had voted against it. C � Commission Meering—Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission supporting the installation of ANOMS, supporting the prohibition of Stage II aircraft, and educating homeowners about their participation in the Part 150 program." • Under "Impacts of Future Land Use Pla.lining," second sentence in second para�raph, correct spelling to "townhome." Inform them it's not true. Guiding principle of land use development is runway usage at MSP, which utilizes the parallel runway for capacity, and should be in line with the noise compatible land uses. With parallel runways and future land use, should reflect continued traffic on the parallel runways. Given time constraints, it was Commission consensus to complete the review of the document at the June ARC meeting. C. NOC Update Chair Petschel reported that MAC deputy director Nigel Finney has retired and will be replaced by Denny Probst and Kevin Hochman will replace UPS representative Pete Livermore. Mr. Livermore was a member of the original Blue Ribbon Panel that put MAC together and the only person on the carrier side that voted with the communities on the sound insulation for 60/64, to his risk and displeasure of Kathleen Nelson. Discussion had taken place regarding proj ected and actual noise contours, required as a result of the lawsuit. Operations off 12L are higher than projected and use of 17 is below forecast in actual numbers but up 10% over last year. The noise contour over Mendota Heights is larger than projected. ANOMS actual numbers are close to modeled numbers, so projections match the actual very closely with the exception of 12L. Runway use and nighttime operations are driving the current noise map the most. Upgrade for .ANOMS software and sensors related to real-time flight tracking will cost $500,000. Worst offenders for lowering landing gear is Fed Ex; UPS is on board and Tim Butalla, chief pilot for Northwest, sits on the NOC and has been briefing pilots from Fed Ex and Delta, hoping to see positive changes. The word is getting out about compliance and the next thing to watch is to see if Apple Valley sees positive effects from the compliance. Commissioner Reed commented that no one should expect contours to match very well, as they are generated five years in advance, that the 2007 projection started in 2000. He said the area most different between projection and actual is Bloomington because flights aren't departing on 17 as much as they want them to and there should be a bigger difference and Mendota Heights getting more equitable benefit. Commissioner Raed said the numbers don't make sense because departure distributions are twice as much on 12L as 12R but arrivals are nearly identical. 0 Commission Meedng — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relarions Commission D. Tower Tour — May 19, 2008, ARC Meeting �,' '� The ARC meeting has been moved from May 14 to May 19, when the Tower tour is scheduled. Those scheduled for the tour will meet at City Hall at 4 p.m. and drive together to the 4:30 p.m. tour. Attendees should RSVP to Mr. Danielson via email, as the Tower requests a complete list of narnes in advance of the tour. Commissioner Sloan reported that he wouldn't be able to attend. Mr. Rydeen and Mr. Leqve will meet with the Cornmission in a separate room after the tour. Issues to be addressed (requested in advance by the Tower) include, but may not be limited to: • Northern excursions • Nighttime operations • Crossing corridor use • Runway selection determination and who assigns the runway • Radio recording system • Conformance to EIS • Reason as to why twice as many flights utilize 12L as 12R when a similar number of gates are close to each one • Reason as to why 12R getting relief from 17, instead of relief for Mendota Heights on 12L Mr. Bergman suggested that NOC members be invited to join the tour, but it was ARC consensus that the decision to invite them be left to Mr. Rydeen's discretion. Chair Petschel recommended that Mr. Danielson inform the City of ARC's May meeting date change, in the event members of the public might be plamiing to attend. E. Reschedule October 15, 2008, ARC Meeting It was Commission consensus that the October 15, 2008, ARC meeting be moved to October 8, in that it conflicts with Yom Kippur. F. Update for Tntroduction Book None. Acknowled�e 12eceipt of Various 12eports/Correspondence A. February 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report B. February 2008 (New Format) ANOM Eagaa�lMendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis C. MSP Noise News (Winter 2008) D. Airport Noise Report, March 7, 2008 � � E. Airport Noise Report, March 14, 2008 C Metropolitan Airports Commission 3209 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in April 2008 2901 (90.4%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor 3209 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations 2901 (90.4%) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 05/07/2008 13:19 Page 1 CITY O�' MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COITNTY, MINNESOTA ATRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES April 9, 2008 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, April 9, 2008, at 7:00 p.rn., in the Large Conference Room at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota. The following Cornrnissioners were present: Liz Petschel, Chair; Bill Dunn, Sally Lorberbaum, Ken Reed, and Dave Sloan, Commissioners. Guests: Mike Heide and Mike Kosel, Rogers Lake Group. Also present were: Jim Danielson, City Administrator; John Berg�nan, Apple Valley Noise Oversight Committee Alternate; and Mary Heintz, Recorder. Not Present: Robin Ehrlich, Vic Chair; Lyle Odland, Commissioner; Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to Mr. Danielson. Approval of Minutes j � Chair Petschel requested a spelluag correction to "Senator Metzen" on page one, second , ) paragraph under Review/Update Goals and Objectives. A motion was made by Commissioner Lorberbaum, seconded by Corrunissioner Dunn, to approve the March 12, 2008, ARC meeting minutes as amended. The ininutes were approved. Unfinished and New Business A. Presentation by Guy Heide and Mike Kosel, Rogers Lake Group Mr. Guy Heide distributed a copy of the final draft report of the MAC Environmental Assessment for the Runway 4-22 Extension. He said the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reasoning for redirecting traffic at night over the Mendota Heights corridor is because fewer residences are located there, which is untrue, and commented that Eagan had pressured the Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) to work on the FAA to do so. Chair Petschel stated that the lneasure had passed by only one vote at that time and that industry representatives and the Northwest Airlines representative had voted against it. Commission Meeting — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Mr. Heide reported that his wife has been unable to sleep because of the airplane noise overhead, even with cotton in her ears, and claims that it has damaged his and his wife's �' health, their home bricks have shattered and windows have been damaged, and his and t Mr. Kosel's chimneys "have been lost." He said he doesn't know what ARC can do but wanted to bring the complaint to the Commission's attention. He provided specifics of his ongoing investigation over the last five years concerning irregularities, "false statements," and "fraud," which have included, but not been lirnited to, his filing of 120 Freedom of Information Acts with the FAA, 100 with MAC, and various meetings with pertinent officials. Mr. Heide cominented that Airport unprovement grants were sought to extend Runway 4-22 because Northwest had threatened to reduce operations and move elsewhere if it didn't get an 11,000-foot runway. He cited various discrepancies in the Environmental Assessment report's data and rnaps, noted postdated amendments and missing accounting records, and said he believes the FAA understated activity and mislead the public. Mr. Heide said he is at the point where he wants to contact the Miller-Ciresi law firm to litigate the Airport's "pattern of wrongdoing" that could reach in the hundreds of millions of dollars Mr. Mike Kosel commented that it appears Mendota Heights was left out of the data in order to make the numbers fit and referenced discrepancies in maps, which began in 1992. He said some MAC Cominissioners have violated their oaths of office in using the 1996 map 65 DNL Contour, which never existed. In addition, he said the Cornmissioners are suppose to disclose their conflicts of interest and cited one, in particular, who was invested in Northwest, Jet Blue and Continental but never disclosed that information ,- � before voting, and said he believes something should be done about that. . �, ' Commissioner Reed said the discrepancy in numbers on the Environmental Assessment report may be math errors. Chair Petschel stated that justification for extending the 4-22 Runway was because of Northwest's insistence to lengthen it for Korean flights and that those flights were to go over Bloomington (nine residential blocks were insulated). She added, however, that those flights never went over Bloomington, but rather onto 12L, 12R and 30s, and so the contours over Mendota Heights haven't reflected the flights that didn't go over Bloomington. Mr. Kosel said the maps do not reflect Mendota Heights in the least, that noise runways are dead center on the runways but that isn't the way planes take off from the airport and instead leave 15 degrees off tlie ground. Coirunissioner Reed commented that the situation may be a huge set of bizarre coincidences. He said that he doesn't mean to diminish any wrongdoing believed to have � been done but that he worked for HNTB and knows that totals can be generated that are bad. He added that he doesn't understand what motivation there would be for such alleged wrongdoing. � Comrnission Meering — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Mr. Kosel said their group has done a tremendous amount of work and the 1992 maps are not representative of the area. He then reported on the tremendous volurne of flights he's experie�ced overhead at home and the corresponding number of complaints he's had to \' make because of it. Chair Petschel assured Mssrs. Heide and Kosel that the ARC has fought aggressively to ensure the City's fair share of nighttirne flights and concurred that it has absorbed twice as many as it should have. She reported that she'd been told that gates on the southeast are closest to 12L, so that runway is preferred in order to save fuel. Mr. Kosel invited Commissioner Reed to his hoine to review all of the documentation that he and Mr. Heide have pulled together, about which 5% was shared at the evening's meeting, and Commissioner Reed agreed to do so. Commissioner Dunn offered to join Commissioner Reed when the meeting occurs. Chair Petschel reassured Mssrs. Heide and Kosel that the ARC's first goal is to address nighttiine operations. She said they would be welcome to come back to ARC with their PowerPoint presentation regarding their issues, which they reported that they have been working on. Mssrs. Heide and Kosel excused themselves from the meeting and general discussion ensued. ( , Commissioner Reed described the public radio frequency real-time sensors that were \ ) utilized at the Tampa International Airport, where he used to work, and suggested that something similar be used at MSP. He stated that tracks, noise levels, and audio transmissions are monitored and time stamped, even identifying who assigns aircraft to particular runways, and quoted a cost of the $100,000 for such a system. Chair Petschel said the suggestion could be made to Carl Rydeen during the ARC's May 19 Tower tour. Commissioner Dunn commented that "the surest way to change behavior is to monitor it." Chair Petschel said the Commission also has to be prepared to address the issue of fuel cost and that the Airport's choice will be the shortest trek to the runway. She did also note, however, that less fuel would be required to go to 12R than to burn fuel to go to 17. Commissioner Reed added that the difference between the cost to save fuel and spend money to sound-insulate homes has to be balanced. Commissioner Reed commented that not much progress seems to have been made by Chad Leqve's group or NOC, in that he doesn't see numbers corning down. He said in his same role at Tampa, as Mr. Leqve, improvement was charted every three months to ensure nuinbers were moving closer to goals. Chair Petschel said ARC needs to talk with Mr. Rydeen to develop a strategy regarding the Tower crossing the corridor over the freeway at nonpeak times and that an accounting is needed as to how frequently that procedure is being used. Commissioner Reed said he would want the measure to go back i to the source, controller, pilot and/or airline policy. \ 1 3 Commission Meeting — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission B. Review Airport Section of 2008 Comprehensive Plan Chair Petschel stated that the Comprehensive Plan is revised every ten years, to address i� various City priorities, and that Mr. Danielson had pulled pieces relative to ARC for its ` review of content and to ensure they are in synch with the Airport Plan of Action, goals and obj ectives, and dovetai� with the City and NOC. Recommended Visions o Under "Airport Plan," second paragraph, remove first two sentences (which follow�: "Since the opening of the "North-South runway, previous issues with the distribution of air traffic have been reduced. All residential areas in Mendota Heights were in conformance with the original aviation guidelines and their previous projections of air noise and air traffic." • Under "Airport Plan," report that the third parag_raph is not true (which follows): "The Runway Use System at MSP relies heavily on "land compatibility" as a guiding principle for departure determination, thereby increasing the volum.e of traffic and the perc�ntage of exclusive use of the southeast corridor, which was zoned commerciaUindustrial in cooperation with regional and local plaruling agencies. This increased traffic has impacted existing compatible residential neighborhoods in Mendota Heights." • Under "Goals and Policies," chan�e Goal 1 to read: "Monitor and control where possible negative airport impacts in Mendota Heights." e Under "Goals and Policies; ' change Goal 2 to read: "To support the equitable � distribution of flights within all comtnunities located close to MSP." �. o Under "Goals and Policies," insert "population in place of "area" to read: "To work diligently with all noise issues and agencies to decrease aircraft noise in volume and to decrease noise impacts to the population." s Under "Goals and Policies " add Goal 4: "Add part 150 plan and subsequent noise compatibility program." • Under "Airport Noise Policies," chan eg Policy 6 to read: "Advocate to increase general aviation use to other reliever airports." • Under "Airport Noise Policies," add Policy 8 to read: "Inform the public/media regarding MAC's progress in addressing noise issues and limitations of noise compatibility program." v Under "History of Noise Reduction Efforts," asked whether it is enforceable because it's a written agreement between MAC and the Cit�(follows�: "Agreement to a contract with MAC prohibiting construction of a third parallel runway." • Under "Historv of Noise Reduction Efforts," add Policy 6 to read: "Ongoing dialogue with adjacent communities, legislators, NOC, FAA and MAC for the purpose of noise attenuation." o Under "History of Noise Reduction Efforts," revise third paragraph b aY ddin "g about their participation" under that section to read: "The City has worked through the various agencies on issues including: modification of aircraft landings and deparhzres, supporting the installation of ANOMS, supporting the prohibition of Stage II aircraft, ,� and educating homeowners about their participation in the Part 150 prograrn." � � Commission Meeting — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission • Under "Impacts of Future Land Use Planning," second sentence in second para�raph, correct spelling to "townhome." Infonn them IT"S NOT TRUE Should guiding principle of land use development is runway usage at MSP which utilizes the parallel runway for capacity and therefore should plan noise compatible land uses in line. With parallel runways and future land use should reflect continued traffic on the parallel runways. Given time constraints, it was Corrunission consensus to complete the review of the document at the June ARC meeting. C. NOC Update Chair Petschel reported that MAC deputy director Nigel Fii�.ney has retired and will be replaced by Denny Probst and ICevin Hochnzan will replace UPS representative Pete Li�rei•in�re. Mr. Livermore was a member of the original Blue Ribbon Panel that put MAC together and the only person on the carrier side that voted with the communities on the sound insulation for 60/64, to his risk and displeasure of ICathleen Nelson. Discussion had taken place regarding projected and actual noise contours, required as a result of the lawsuit. Operations off 12L are higher than projected and use of 17 is below forecast in actual numbers but up 10% over last year. The noise contour over Mendota ( Heights is larger than projected. ANOMS actual numbers are close to modeled nuxnbers, , 1 so projections match the actual very closely with the exception of 12L. Runway use and nighttime operations are driving the current noise map the inost. Upgrade for ANOMS software and sensors related to real-time flight tracking will cost $500,000. Worst offenders for lowering landing gear is Fed Ex; UPS is on board and Tim Butalla, chief pilot for Northwest, sits on the NOC and has been briefing pilots from Fed Ex and Delta, hoping to see positive changes. The word is getting out about compliance and the next thing to watch is to see if Apple Valley sees positive effects from the compliance. Commissioner Reed commented that no one should expect contours to match very well, as they are generated five years in advance, that the 2007 projection started in 2000. He said the area inost different between projection and actual is Bloomington because flights aren't departing on 17 as inuch as they want them to and there should be a bigger difference and Mendota Heights getting more equitable benefit. Commissioner Reed said the numbers don't make sense because departure distributions are twice as much on 12L as 12R but arrivals are nearly identical. D. Tower Tour — May 19, 2008, ARC Meeting The ARC meeting has been moved from May 14 to May 19, when the Tower tour is scheduled. Those scheduled for the tour will meet at City Hall at 4 p.m. and drive together to the 4:30 p.m. tour. Attendees should RSVP to Mr. Danielson via ennail, as the ( Tower requests a complete list of names in advance of the tour. �� ) 5 Commission Meeting — Aprii 9, 2008 Mendota Heights Aiiport Relations Commission Commissioner Sioan reported that he wouldn't' be able to attend. Mr. Rydeen and Mr. Leqve will meet with the Conunission in a separate room a$er the tour. Issues to be addressed (requested in advance by the Tower) include, but may not be limited to: • Northern excursions e Nighttime operations • Crossing corridor use • Runway selection determination and who assigns the runway • Radio recording system s Conformance to EIS � Reason as to why twice as many flights utilize 12L as 12R when a similar number of gates are close to each one s Reason as to why 12R getting relief from 17, instead of relief for Mendota Heights on 12L Mr. Bergman suggested that NOC members be invited to join the tour, but it was ARC consensus that the decision to invite them be left to Mr. Rydeen's discretion. Chair Petschel recommended that Mr. Danielson inform the City of ARC's May meeting date change, in the event members of the public might be plamiillg to attend. E. Reschedule October 15, 2008, ARC Meeting ( 8 �� - It was Commission consensus that the October � 2008, ARC meeting be moved to October� in that it conflicts with Yom Kippur. IS F. Update for Introduction Book None. Acknowled�e Receapt of Various Renorts/Correspondence A. February 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report B. February 2008 (New Format) ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis C. MSP Noise News (Winter 2008) D. Airport Noise Report, March 7, 2008 E. Airport Noise Report, March 14, 2008 Other Commission Comments or Concerns None. 0 � i' Commission Meeting — Apri19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission Upcomin� Meetin�s • City Council Meeting — April 15, 2008 — 7:30 p.m. • MAC Meeting — April 21, 2008 —1:00 p.m. Public Comments None. Adioarn Commissioner Dunn made a motion, seconded by Coinmissioner Lorberbaum, to adjourn the ineeting at 9:18 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Mary Heintz TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. � � f CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES May 19, 2008 The Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission met at City Hall to drive together to the MSP Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) for a 4:30 p.m. tour conducted by ATCT Operations Manager Carl Rydeen and MAC Aviation Noise Manager Chad Leqve. The following Commissioners were present: Liz Petschel, Chair; Robin Ehrlich, Vice Chair; Bill Dunn and Ken Reed, Cominissioners; and Sandra Krebsbach, Council Member. Also present: Jim Danielson, City Administrator; Jake Sedlacek, Assistant to the City Administrator; Ellsworth Stein, former ARC meinber; and Mary Heintz, Recorder. Approval of Minutes It was Coinmission consensus to table approval of the April 9, 2008, ARC meeting minutes to the next regular ARC meeting. Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence � ' A. March 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report � B. March 2008 ANOM EaganlMendota Heights Deparhire Corridor Analysis C. Guy Heide letter D. Airport Noise Report, April 4, 2008 E. Airport Noise Report, April 11, 2008 F. Airport Noise Report, Aprii 18, 2008 G. Airport Noise Report, Apri125, 2008 H. Airport Noise Report, May 2, 2008 I. Airport Noise Report, May 9, 2008 MSP Air Traffic Control Tower Meetin� and Tour The A.RC met with Mssrs. Rydeen and Leqve and other tower representatives in the tower meeting room before the tour. At the meeting, Mr. Rydeen displayed a speeded-up simulation of actual flights departing and arriving at MSP that showed crossing traffic to reach runway 17. Mr. Rydeen cited factors that deternune runway choice and said controllers do not differentiate between 12L and 12R. Mr. Leqve noted that flight impact has been decreased due to fleet inix (decreased DC9s and increased CRJs) and lower-than-anticipated flights. Mr. Rydeen stated that MSP ATCT procedures are driven by safety and efficiency/noise abatement. Minutes of Meeting and Tour — May 19, 2008 Mendota Heights Airport Relations Comunission Council Member Krebsbach asked when the RNAV would be put into use. Mr. Rydeen quoted September 24 but said only 65% of aircraft will be compatible at that time. He ( briefly described the system (which takes the place of heading navigation) and said it will { increase potential for aircraft fo be more precise and efficient and provide a predictable track. The goal is to work with Northwest in creating and publishing procedures for the new system and then coordinate them between the tower and pilots. Mr. Rydeen said that he would like to utilize the system for daytime as well as initial nighttime use. Council Member Krebsbach commented on inequitable use of the two 12s. Mr. Rydeen reported that 12L night-time 2007 annualized flights were forecasted at 14.1 % and came in at 19.5%. He reiterated that runway choice is determined according to efficiency and safety and said the biggest issue is runway incursion. Discussed ensued. Mr. Leqve, responding to a question about the possible Northwest Airlines-Delta merger, stated that growth opportunities are anticipated at MSP and Detroit for international destinations and gates. Mr. Rydeen addressed questions sulslnitted in advance by ARC concerning out-of- corridor excursions (does not believe it is pilot error), wheels down (seeks standardization), RUS update, crossing the corridor update, runway selection (determined by ground controller according to destination, adding that separation occurs on the ground), radio recording of pilot-tower conversations (doesn't want the pilot to be a controller or noise expert; if a problem or anomaly is identified, for instance, by Mendota Heights and it can be fixed, he will do something about it if he is able; and Chair Petschel %� commented that she is interested more in trends versus individual occurrences), and � conformance to FEIS. Responding to a question posed at the meeting, he reported that MSP ATCT is fully staffed and many new employees coming in are very highly qualified after completing their training at the North Dakota facility. The group then took a tour of the control tour and radar room. Adiourn The tour was completed at 630 p.m. and the group returned to City Hall. Upcomin� Meetin�s s MAC Meeting — May 19, 2008 —1:OOp.m. • City Council Meeting — May 20, 2008 — 7:30 p.m. s NOC Meeting — May 21, 200$ —1:30 p.m. Respectfiilly submitted, Mary Heintz TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 0 � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS IlT�� June 4, 2008 TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, City Administra SUBJECT: Review MAC Tower Tour DISCUSSION: Attached are last month's tower tour discussion issues. Review the issues to determine any action. C � � Cari, I discussed the May 19th Tower visit with the Mendota Heights ARC last night. The ARC confirmed with me that Monday May 19 at 4:30pm would be an acceptable time for the visit. They also said that, if you desired to invite other members of the NOC to the visit, the ARC would be fine with that too. You asked me to inquire as to what type of questions the ARC would be interested in discussing, I asked them that question and they told me the following: fihe runway and why? departures from 12R? 1. Out of the corridoNnorthern excursions — is that a result of tower direction or pilot error? 2. Wheels up/down, when — how does that affect noise? 3. RUS update 4. Crossing in the Corridor update 5. When an aircraft calls for a departure — who selects 6. Radio recording of pilot/tower? 7. Nighftime departures? 8. Conformance to FEIS? 9. Why are the departures from 12L double the C�� C � �t ti �� .�� .� Minneapolis/St. Paul Internationai Airport (MSP) Nt�y 30, aoos Minneapolis Auport FAA ATCT Attn: Mr. Carl Rydeen Manager — MSP Air Traffic Control Tower 631 I 34th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 RE: Area Navigation Pracedures at Minneapalis/St. Paul International Airport Dear Mr. Rydeen, The Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport (MSP) Noise Oversight Committee {NOC) is a twelve member Coxnmittee comprised af six airport user representatives and six community representatives that makes airport noise related recornmendations to the Meh�opolitan Airparts Commission (MAC). At the May 21, 200$ NOC meeting, MAC staff briefed the Committee on the progress being made with Area Navigation (RNAV) procedure implementation at MSP in the case of the Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor and the 21S-degree departure track off Runway 17. It is clear that progress in this ( ) regard would not be possible without your willingness to collaborate on strategies for addressing noise ( � concerns around MSP. Pursuant to the Committee's direction at the May 21S` meeting, as the Co-Chairs of the I�TOC, we would like to express our sincere gratitude, on behalf of the Committee, for your efforts to date to implement RNAV procedures during the nighttime hours at MSP to help reduce noise impacts. Moreover, we want to voice the NOC's strong support of the �ederal A�iation Adminisiration {FAA) and Northwest Airlines entering into a Letter of Agreement (LOA) to begin the implementation af RNAV procedures for the Crossing-in-the-Corridor point for depariures aff of 12L and 12R, as well as an RNAV departure procedure for the 215-degree track off Runway 17 for use by properly equipped Northwest Airlines aircraft during the nighttime hours when available. Once again, thank you for your continued contributions to this effort. This initiative will provide excellent data for analysis and, hopefully, a legitimate starting point for the cansideration of this technology for wider application in the future at MSP. Sinc rety, �� '�� Vcrn V�Tilcos NOC Co-Chair & City Council Member — City of Bloomington ��-�-�-'� �7 `�� K� hleen Nels�n NOC Co-Chair & Northwest Airlines Regional Director — Airline Affairs ' cc: MSP NOC �. ,) MAC C4111iI1iS510I10t'S ( ) Mr. Jeff Hamiel, MAC Executive Director Mr. Denny Probst, MAC Deputy Exeeutive Director — Planning and Environment 58 �,� � ¢ �Ir �Ie' .,.;r�u ��' ��L .. ��x•� .�' , �I ��L-�� ,�"I: ��x.. s`�rs., .��:i8 ��M M=t�s.. ,:r� � �.�r..f` .�, E'"3<°' r. �+. a�"' s.�. iza,,- ed,'v �a. o�,.�'� y� ,,..� ��• sJ ��:.r .�, Y��. A weekly update on litigation, regalations, and technological developm enis Volume 20, Number 15 May 23, 2008 i i r , � �, , , ,. : i : � • , • ��• • � The California state Senate recently passed, by nearly unanimous vote, a bill strongly pushed by the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) that sirengthens the state's airport land use laws. S.B. 1118 requires all counties in the state with at least one public use airpart to have an airport land use commission (ALUC). Nine counties, including Marin, San Bernardino, and Santa Cruz counties, are affected by the bill, which was passed by the state Senate on May 1 and is now under consideration by the state Assembly. The California Legislature originally required all counties in the state to set up ALUCs to plan for the areas around airports with scheduled service. The Legisla- ture later extended that mandate to require ALUCs to plan for all public use airports. However, in 1993, to save money, the Legislature repealed the mandate for counties to have ALUCs. The following year, it reinstated the mandate but allowed local officials to avoid forming an ALUC if they found there were no noise, public safety, or land use issues facing affected airports. The result was that several counties stopped using a county-wide body to plan for land use (Contirsued.on p. 59) �'ongestion I:1� �� : �: ;.. � ;��, ,�; ., , , .. � � { :�- _ � :�; : : �; t � :�; �, � <�� x ��t '' • ,1;'` �� :, ��u ,�, To ease airspace congestion in the New York area and keep ticket prices down, the Department of Transportation May 16 proposed slot auctions at John F. Kennedy and Newark International airports and a cap on tra�c at Newark. The controversial proposal, based on DOT's assertion that it owns airline slots, was strongly opposed by the Air Transport Association and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which have vowed to fight it. DOT's proposal was published as a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the May 21 Federal Register. DOT is accepting public comments on the NPRM until July 21. The NPRM is avaiiable online at http://edocket.access.gpo.�ov/2008/ 08-1271.htm. Under DOT's proposal, all airlines operating at Newark and JFK wouid be given up to 20 slots a day for the 10-year life of the rule. The proposal offers two options for JFK which would affect between 91 and 179 slots out of the 1,245 total siots at the airport. Under the first, 10 percent of the airline's slots above the 20-slot baseline would be made available via an auction. The airlines could bid on their own slots. The revenue from those auctions would then be invested in congestion and capacity improvements in theNew York region. (Coniinued on p. 59) In This .�ssue... Legislation ... California Senate passes bill thatrepeals authority that allowed counties to exemptthemselves from require- ment to set up aiport land use commissions -p. 5 $ Con,gestion ... DOT pro- poses slot auctions at JFK, Newark airports to ease conges- tion inNYareabutairlines, PANYNJ vow to fight it - p. 58 Santa 1t�onica ... District 1 I Courtjudgeissuespreliminary �i injunctionbacringcityfrom �I banninghigh-speed Category C and D planes; city asks Ninth ' Circuit for staypending appeal of injunction order - p. 59 Environment ... Boeing issues its 2008 EnvironmentReport; beginsworkon newBoeing Business Jet 3- p. 60 NextGen ... FAA air traffic official appointed seniorvice president ofNextGen Operations and Planning - p. 60 News Eriefs ... Alex Smith, who pioneered real-time flight tracking, leaves Erato become manging director ofcommunica- tions andtechnology company ...Transatlantic Aviation Issues Conference to be held in Brussels on June 30- July 1- p. 60 23. 2008 around public use airports. S.B.1118 repeals the authority for a county to exempt itself from the requirement to set up an airport ]and use commis- sion. It also specifies that a two-thirds vote by a county board of supervisors is required to overturn an ALUC decision. That provision was aimed at Marin County, which only requires a majority vote to override an ALUC decision. The legislation is intended to restore the Legislature's desire that local o�cials and aviation experts meet in a countywide setting to balance competing interests. Because most counties have kept their ALUCs operating, the bill will not afFect them. But nine counties will have to change how land use pianning and regulation occurs around their public use airports. Also, some cities will lose the direct control over land use around airports that they currently enjoy. ALUCs are comprised of seven members representing cities, counties, aviation experts, and the general public. They must adopt "airport compatibility land use plans" (ACLUPs) for areas around public use airports. ALUCs can determine whether city and county general plans and particular land use decisions are consistent with those ACLUPS. A city council or county board of supervisors can overrule an ALUC's consistency determination on a two- thirds vote. However, if the ciry or county overrules the ALUC, state law stipulates that the airport operator is immune from liability for property damages or personal injury from the city or county's decision. AOPAApplauds Bill AOPA applauded the legislation and said, had it been passed earlier, it could have made it much easier and less expens'rve to protect Watsonville Municipal Airport from residential encroachment. In March, the Wastonville Pilots Association and a neighborhood advocacy group called Friends of Buena Vista won a lawsuit that will prevent the City of VJatsonville from building homes north of the airport. The ruling also overturned resolutions passed by ihe city in 2005 eliminat- ing one runway safety zone and limiting another. "The Watsonville case perfectly illustrates why California's airport lanfl use laws need to be reinforced" said Greg Pecoraro, AOPA vice president of regional affairs. "Had an airport commission been in place, it would have helped to ensure the city's decision complies with the state's a�iation handbook guidelines. That's why we've been supporting this legislation for the last two years." Congestion, from p. 58 Under the second option for JFK, the airlines would auction 10 percent of siots above the 20-slot baseline and keep ali the proceeds. DOT also is proposing to auction 10 percent of slots at Newark above the baseline annually for the first five years of the rule. As a resuit, only 96 slots out of the total 1,219 slots at the airport would be auctioned over the 10-year lifespan of the rule. � 59 DOT is proposing to cap flights at Newark at 83 per hour at least until the end of October 2009. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters said that airlines operating at JFK and Newark "would receive a 10-year interest in some of the world's most valuable aviation assets, free of charge, free of question and free of hassle." She said that DOT is proposing to auction slots because economists estimate that caps at airports without competition can increase fares for passengers between 11 to 15 percent over similar flights at other airports. Economists estimate that fares drop by over 30 percent when new airlines enter a market. "Simply put, competition drives down fares," Peters said. ATA called the slot auction proposai "i1l-conceived and unlawful." "Instead of focusing on modernizing and expand- ing the airspace infrastructure as the tra�eling and shipping public expects, the governments seeks to curb that demand by making it more costly to fly. We must work to expand, not limit, capacity. This experimentwill penalizethe public." Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) called the slot auction "nothing short of insanity ... Auctions have never been tried and were hatched by a handful of ivory tower types in the administration. It shows that this administration puts ideology above the safety and economic well-being of the American flier." At the heart of the issue is the question of who owns the airline slots that DOT seeks to auction ofF. DOT General Counsel D.J. Gribbin asserts that slots are intangible Federal Aviation Administration property granted to airports and that the airlines have no legal property interest in them or authority over them. However, Douglas Lavin, the International Air Transport Association's regional vice president for North America, contends that there is no legal authority for DOT's assertion that airline slots are the properly of the govemment. Slots u•e the property rights of the airlines, he said, and attempts to take away that property will require due process and just compensation. Santa Monica . � � � �. � � . . ;� . � � � ,� � � � � ; . . On May 16, a U.S. District Court judge issued a preliminary injunction barring the City of Santa Monica, CA, from enforcing an unprecedented ordinance banning high-speed Category C and D business jets, such as the Gulfstream N, from operating at Santa Monica Airport for safety reasons. The order by Judge George H. Wu compels the city to comply with an Interim Cease and Desist Order issued by the Federal Aviation Administration on May 12. However, on May 23, the City of Santa Monica asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for a stay pending its appeal of the judge's preliminary injunction order. Unless that stay is granted, the FAA order will be in effect during the pendency of the agency's administrative proceed- ings on the validity of the ordinance or during any proceed- Aitport Noise Report �, C 23, 2008 ings before a federal appeals court if the city chooses to challenge the FAA's Cease and Desist Order. The Santa Monica ordinance bans Category C and D business jets – that have faster landing speeds than the airport was designed for – from operating. The city fears that faster jets will overrun the runways and crash into homes that are located only 300 feet from runway ends. FAA asserts that the design category of an airport cannot be used to limit operations at an airport. The agency offered to install a 70-knot Emergency Material Arresting System at Santa Monica Airport that wouid stop approximately 97 percent of operations at the airport and 90 percent of Category C and D aircraft. However, the city turned that offer down. FAA also asserts that the city's ban will do irreparable harm by disrupting 9,000 operations a year at the airport. Santa Monica officials urged the judge to take public safety into account and not to issue the preliminary injunc- tion. Aircraft :i 1 • '. ( ( i I • , � ,M ;, ,�' ; On May 22, the Boeing Company released its 2008 Environment Report which details the company's perfor- mance, strategy, and actions to reduce its environmentai footprint and to develop environmentally progressive products and services. Over the last 40 years, airplane emissions of carbon dioxide have been reduced by approximately 70 percent and the noise footprints have been reduced by approximately 90 percent, according to the report. Boeing said it targets improved fuel e�ciency of each new generation of commer- cial airplanes by 15 percent compared to the planes they replace. Most of the report focuses on reductions of aircraft emissions but noise is addressed. "The 787 Dreamliner uses a number of new techniques – most importantly, acoustically treated engine inlets and high bypass ratio along with other special treatments for the engines – to ensure that all sound of 85 dB (about the levei of loud traffic heard from the side of the road) never leaves the airpoi�t boundaries. In fact, the noise footprint of the 78'7 is 60 percent smaller than those of today's similarly sized airplanes," the Boeing report states. The report is available online at http://www.boeing:com/ aboutus/environment. Work Begins on BBJ 3 In related news, Boeing announced May 10 that it has begun work on the first Boeing Business Jet 3(BBJ 3), a new, larger business jet based on the company's Next- Generation 737-900 ER (extended range) airplanes which entered commercial service and was certified by the FAA in Apri12007. 60 The BBJ 3 was launched in October 2006 and will enter service in 2009 with an unidentified customer. The same CFM56-� engines that are used on Next-Generation 737 commercial aircraftwill powerthe BBJ 3. Ali BBJs are equipped with Aviation Partners Boeing Blended Winglets, which reduce community noise by 0.5 to 2.1 EPNdB on takeoffwith a slight improvement on ap- proach, according to Boeing. The winglets also reduce fuel burn 5.8 percent on a 5,800 nautical mile trip, increase the plane's range up to 270 nautical miles, and reduce engine maintenance costs. NextGen � . , ;� , � � ,. �' ' � �' FAA Acting Administrator Robert Sturgell announced May 20 that Vicki Cox has been appointed as Senior Vice President ofNextGen and Operations Planning. Cox previously served as a vice president in the FAA's Air Traffic Organization. She will lead the effort to transform the nation's airspace system by using 21�` century technologies – known as NextGen — to meet changing aviation demands. Some of these modernization activities has already begun and include deployment of satellite-based technology, airspace redesign, and runway safety improvements. "Given the aviation community's increasing need for faster modernization or our airtra�c control system, we must implementNextGen at a quicker pace," said Sturgell. "The FAA is putting an emphasis on near- and mid-term imple- mentation, while the Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO) continues its focus on long-term research and development, and cross-agency cooperation." FAA said that Cox's new position will incorporate the 7PD0 in addition to providing increased focus on the modernization of the nation's air traffic control system through the NextGen plan. JPDO help coordinate the efforts of several federal departments and agencies, including the Departments of Transportation, Defense, Commerce, and Homeland Security, as well as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In B�ief ... � Smith Joins SepiaWave SepiaVJave, LLC announced May 19 that Alex Smith has been appointed Managing Director of the Seattle-based cornmunications and technology company. He previously served as Chaiiman of the Board of Directors of Era Corpora- tion, which is being acquired by SRA International (20 ANR 52). Smith spent over a decade pioneering the use, acceptance, and adoption of real-time flight tracking and aircraft identifi- cation technologies that dramatically improved the accuracy Airport Noise Report 23, 2008 _ 61 ANR EIiI'�0�2IAL and safety of global air traffic control and airport and military surveillance A�V�SOR.Y B(DA.I2� operations. Many airports use Era's flight tracking technology to monitor compliance with noise abatement flight paths. John J. Corbett,Esq. In his new position, Smith's responsibilities "will include market analysis, Spiegel & McDiarmid strategy development, research investment, and product development to washin�ton, DC commercialize technologies that aim to improve network efficiency, bandwidth Carl E. Burleson management, and digital integration for #he personal communications, Director, Office of Environment and Energy automotive, and consumer elect�onics industries," SepiaWave said. Federal Aviation Administration Said Smitll, "This position with SepiaWave presents a unique opportunity to address many of the technology implementation barriers that face our Michael 5cott Gatzlce, Esq. transportation and communications market segments. I look forward to Gatzke, Dilton & Ballance Carlsbad, CA applying my experience with air traffic management systems to improve the performance of other network-based data. systems and building strategic Peter J. Kirsch, Esq, partnerships with our industry stakeholders." Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP Asked if he wi11 no lon er work on aviation issues Smith told ANR "I'll Denver g > > probably always work on aviation issues but for now I wanted to take the Vincent E. Mestre, P.E. experience I gained in aviation and aerospace and apply sorne of it to other President, Mestre Greve Associates very large and somewhat less-regulated markets (with shorter technology Laguna Niguel, CA lifecycles). So, all the things I worked on, like trying to improve performance Steven F. Pflaum, Esq. and throughput of various technologies, is what I will do, for now, for the McDermott, Will & Emery automotive and personal communications markets." Chicago Mary L. Vigilante President, Synergy Consultants Seattle Transatlantic Aviation Issues Conference Issues that cause concern for airports and the aviation community on both sides of the Atlantic — including environmental issues — will be addressed at the Transatlantic Aviations Issues Conference, which will be held June 30 - July 1 in Brussels. The conference, which brings together heads of industry and govemment from the United States and Europe, will address airport capacity, air tra�c, aviation safety, general and business aviation, environment, and the EU-US Open Skies Agreement. Confi�•med speakers include FAA Acting Administrator Robert Sturgell, Director of the Aviation Department of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Williarn Decota, President and CEO of the Metropolitan Washing- ton Airports Authority James Bennett, as well as European aviation and political leaders. The conference is sponsored by the American Association of Airport Executives, APCO Worldwide, and the Internationai Association of Airport Executives in collaboration with the European Commission, Eurocontroi, European Civil Aviation Conference, and the FA.A. For program information, contact Melissa Sabatine at AAAE (melissa.sabtineCc�aaae.org�. For registration information, contact Natalie Fleet (natalie.fleet(a�aaae.org�. AIRPORT NOISE REP�JRT AnneH. Kohut, Publisher Published 44 times ayear at43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528. e-mail:editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price$750. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the intemal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by Airport Noise Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA. /,. ( t � 62 � � ,, �. p,,. t .� a .rlx �L�",:s r+��"`x � � ,�, r , � �`.'�"' �..�I,�' • xs�./�a' �x � '2 a''n w y,�:. h�. � {} d tit� �v �t ,�. P �. ,� -k^ n. 8 F.t �,. tEs ,}r w .u'� �aa �� c .,a•.,�' P � �, �, '�voa .�r "n, '.�z`, ".�� h1d` nti,r �4..- � v'�ri' �;' Ffi:ca �'3�a A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments Volume 20, Number 16 � May 30, 2005 Naples Airport IVAPLES IS FIRST AIRPCART TO EMPI.OY NEW ADSB TEC]E�N�►I.OGY iN PAR�' 150 STUIDY Naples Airport appears to be the first in the country to plan to use state-of-the- art ADSB technology – the backbone of the NextGen satellite-based air traffic system that is just beginning to be installed – to improve the accuracy of flight tracking in a Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program study. The advantage of using ADSB at Naples is that the flight tracking data will be more accurate than radar data, explained Ted Baldwin of Harris Miller Miller & Hanson Inc., the acoustical consulting firm that is conducting the noise study. Like rnax�y general aviation airports, Naples has no flight tracking capability and is 40 miles away from the nearest radar facility. Because radar data degrade over distance, the data would be less accurate at the 40-mile range than nearer the radar equipment. The combination of portable noise monitors and ADSB technology will give Naples data that are the equivalent of what a permanent rioise monitoring system would provide. It is hoped that within a few months an ADSB antenna will be constructed at Naples Airport so the system can be put in use. Aircraft must be equipped with (Continued on p. 63) New �rleans Int'Z �: � : ' : :, . ,, ,� , .� 4. ; : . _ �: ;. : ,�� : ; . :: : . ; 4�� 1, P '� i F (,i \. 1'�. �. .,';�� ,,� '�� `. : t,i � _� " Business-sponsored legislation working its way through the Louisiana Legisla- ture would move control of Louis Armstrong International Airport from the City of New Orleans to a state agency which concerns officials of local jurisdictions around the airport. The airport is owned by the City ofNew Orleans (Orleans Parish) but is primarily located in the City of Kenner, which is in neighboring Jefferson Parish. A small portion of the airport's longest runway is located in St. Charles Parish. Officials of St. Charles Parish fear that the legislation sets the stage fox construc- tion of a new runway in their jurisdiction because it creates a new entity to run the airport — the Southeast Regional Airport Authority — which would ha�e power to expropriate private property to expand the airport. The City of New Orleans cannot acquire land to expand the airport because it is located outside the city's boundaries. On May 19, the St. Charles Parish Council passed a resolution urging its legisla- tive delegation to block House Bill 1272, which would create a regional airport authority whose boundaries would incorporate JefFerson, Orleans, and St. Charles parishes. 'The Louisiana Superdome Commission is pushing the bill which would give the (Continued on p. 63) Iia Tlzis Issue... Naples Airport ... ADSB technologywill beused inthe airport's noise studyto getmore accurate flighttracks - p. 62 New Orleans Int'l ... State bill would give power to take land near airport for expansion to new regional airport authority - p. 62 Izesearch ... Dutch study is firstto identify non-acoustic measures airports are usingto mitigate annoyance -p. 63 Chicago O'I�are Int't ... Supreme Courtrules against church seekingta blockrelocation ofcemeteryneeded for expansion of airport - p. 64 14ircraft �a�ganes ... Ground test data fornew Pratt BL Whitney GearedTurbofanEngine show it is on target to meet si gnificant noise reduction goals - p. 64 News Briefs ... 8th Annual AirportNoise Mitigation Sympo- siumwillbeheld in SanAntonio in mid-October ... FAA approves noise maps forMonterey Penin- sula Airport and Fort Worth AllianceAirport ... Newnoise officers are hired for Washington Dulles/ReaganNational Airports andPhiladelphialnternational Airport - p. 65 2008 ADSB technology in order to be picked up by the antenna, and the Federal Aviation Administration is not requiring all aircraft to be ADSB-equipped until 2020 – so not all planes will be tracked with the new technology. But DayJet Corporation's fleet of Eclipse 500 very light jets (VLJs) will be and that is important for the noise study because the VLJs are a new kind of air service at Napies. In January, DayJet – an air taxi service expanding in the southeast — announced that Naples Airport will be part of its "DayPort" service network. DayJet corporate members fly "per-seat, on-demand" to and from more than �45 regional destinations across Alabarna, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, and South Carolzna. All af DayJet's air service will start and end at one of seven DayPorts, including the one at Naples. Naples' Part 150 study got underway in February and is not expected to be submitted to the FAA for approval until mid 2010. ADSB Technology ADSB is an acronym for Automatic Dependent Surveil- lance Broadcast. It is new technology that allows pilots in the air and air traffic controllers on the ground to "see" air tra�c with far greater precision than radar provides. Aircraft equipped with ADSB broadcast their precise position in space along with other data (such as airspeed, altitude, and whether they are turning or climbing or descending} via data links. ADSB receivers that are installed in other aircraft or integrated into air traffic facilities receive the data and provide real-time traffic depictions both in the air and on the ground. ADSB relies on the sateilite-based global position- ing systern (GPS} to determine an aircraft's precise position in space. Unlike conventional radar systems, ADSB works on the ground and at low altitudes so that it can be used to monitor traffic on airport runways and taxiways. It also works in mountainous areas where radar coverage is limited and it does not seriously degrade with distance or atmospheric conditions. Last August, the FAA awarded a contract worth up to $1.8 billion to ITT Corporation of WhitePlains, NY, to construct the ADSB system (19 ANR 1 l 9). Under the contract, ITT will build ground stations for the system, which will be brought online across the country, starting in the East Coast, portions of the Midwest, Alaska, and the Gulfof Mexico. Nationwide coverage is expected by 2013. ITT has begun installing the system in Florida, although Naples Airport's ADSB antenna is not part of that contract. Boca Raton Airport is in the process of getting an ITT- installed ADSB antenna and also is a DayPort of DayJet air taxis. Paul McDermott, assistant airport manager, said that Boca has a non-precision approach but the ADSB antenna will allow a precision approach and provide all-weather capacity. It also will allow curved approaches. 63 New Orleans, from p. 62 City ofNew Orleans $500 million in bond money in exchange for control over the airport. The bond money would be used by New Orleans to redevelop the city. The legislation would establish a nine-member governing board for the regional airport authority. Members would be appointed by the governor from lists submitted by St. Charles Parish, Jefferson Parish, and the City of Kenner (who would each have one member); two members would represent the City of New Orleans and four members would be at-large. An amendment to the bill reduced the number of inembers that Jefferson Parish would have from two to one and gave the City of Kenner one member. The New Orleans Aviation Board, which governs the airport now, is also comprised of nine members but only two represent communities near the airport (Kenner and St. Charles Parish). St. Charles Parish Councilman Larry Cochran said he was concerned that the regional airport authority would build a new runway in St. Charles Parish. He said he did not want residents in his district to have more aircraft noise over their heads. The Parish may ha�e sarne legai leverage over expansion of the airport. It has zoned the area that will most likely be targeted for airport expansion for airport use. However, any project done in that airport use zone requires Parish approval of a special use permit. Researcla - {, a, .,3 l ��'. ; :�; : ; :, . �. :�: ', , ., ; ; �, : ,; � ; ;�; A new study from The Netherlands identifies non-acoustic measures that airports are using to mitigate annoyance in surrounding communities. The study, "Noise Annoyance Mitigation at Airports by Non-Acoustic Measures Inventory and Initial Analysis," was discussed in a recent Wyle Noise Bulletin and is available at htt�://www.wylelabs.com/content/ 1� obal/ documents/ResearchReportNonAcousti c.pdf. The study by Ruud Vader, a communication researcher, was commissioned by Luchtrerkeersleiding Nederland, the air traffic control service for The Netherlands. The study describes how and why non-acoustic factors play an important role in determining the level of annoyance that people experience from aircraft noise, Wyle explained in its Bulietin. The study identifies 50 "Non-Acoustic Noise Annoyance Mitigation Measures" (NANAMM's) that are categorized into eight main types: community programs, consultation, compensation, financial, information, insula- tion, land use, and property. The Dutch study is the most comprehensive examination of NANAMNIs to date. Wyle said the study "found that NANAMMs can range as broad as any measure or activity Aiiport Noise Report t � � 30, 2008 that involves the relationship between airports and the surrounding communities. Many NANAMMs are simple and obvious while others are innovative and special. Such measures include Stansted's properly value guarantee, O'Hare's Land Use Grant, Anchorage's scheme of enlisting volunteers to assist in disaster exercises, several airport's environmental compensation projects, and the micro-climate projects at Schiphol Airport. [The study] also found that the Australia Aviation Noise Guidance materials may be hetpfui in designing more effective communication between airports and residents." Chicago O'Hare Int'l ;1 �; ' 1, � � I . � • , �- _ _ The U.S. Supreme Court May 12 i�uled against a church seeking to block the City of Chicago from relocating a cemetery to expand O'Hare Infernational Airport on the ground that it violates First Amendment freedom of religion protections. The High Court declined to hear a case filed by St. John's United Church of Christ in Bensenville, IL, where the City of Chicago has condemned the church cemetery and ordered graves to be relocated in order to clear a path for a new runway that is part ofthe massive $15 billion expansion plan for 0'Hare. The Supreme Court ruling lets stand a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeais for the Seventh Circuit allowing Chicago to acquire and demolish the St. Johannes Cemeteay. Rosemarie Andolino, executive director for the O'Hare Modernization Program, said she was "extremely pleased" with the High Court's ruling. "We will continue to move forward with acquisition of the cemetery and will be contact- ing next of kin in order to begin the relocation process." St. John's United Church of Christ, which owns the cemetery, as well as the suburbs of Elk G►•ove Village and Bensenville, IL, still have a case challenging the expansion pending in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Golumbia where they feel they have a better chance of winning. That case challenges the finance scheme for the O'Hare expansion plan and asserts that the Federal Aviation Administration should not have approved federal grants to finance the project. Another case is pending in the DuPage County court that chall�nges Chicago's authority to take the property needed to expand O'Hare. This November, Chicago is set to open the first new runway in the airport's modernization program, which will reconfigure the runways from an intersecting design to a parallel configuration, with eight runways instead of the current seven. The city hopes to open a second new runway in 2011 but the litigation over the cemetery rnay delay that schedule. 64 Aircraft Engines GROUND TEs�'S �oMPLE�� ON GEARE�D TURBOFAN ENGINE Initiai data from recently-completed acoustic ground tests show that Pratt & Whitney's new Geared Turbofan demon- strator engine "is right on target" to meet significant noise reduction goals, Bob Saia, Pratt & Whitney's vice president, Next Generation Product Family, announced May 28 at the 2008 BerlinAir Show. Pratt & Whitney expects its new engine to be 50 percent quieter than today's jet engines and 20 dB quieter than International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Stage 4 aircraft noise certification standards. "The ground test noise data wiil be compiled with flight test measurements taken later this year to validate the Geared Turbofan engine's noise signature. The significantly lower noise of the Geared Turbofan engine is a key benefit to airlines andoperators, giving them increased flexibility for landing and takeoff at airports with heavy noise regula- tions," Saia said. The ground acoustic testing used an array of 32 individual microphones around the engina test stand and 16 sound pressure transducers inside the engine to get accurate data for noise modeling. Pratt & Whitney said its new engine "is expected to set new standards in environmental performance and operating value for the next generation of commercial aircraft." The Geared Turbofan engine has a state-of-the-art gear system that allows the engine's fan to operate at a different speed than the low-pressure compressor and turbine. This results in greater fuel efficiency and a slower fan speed for reduced noise. The Geared Turbofan demonstrator engine recently completed Phase II ground tests and has been cleared for flight testing on Pratt & Wl�itney's 747SP flying test bed this summer. The Phase II ground tests began in April at the company's advanced test facility in West Palm Beach, FL, and focused on engine performance and ground acoustics with the new engine's flight capable nacelle system. Performance Targets Met or Exceeded "The ground test program has been a complete success and the Geared Turbofan engine has met or exceeded all performance targets," Saia said. "This demonstrator engine has confirmed the laboratory results of our Fan Drive Gear System demonstrating excellent efficiency and operational characteristics. The double-digit reductions in fuei burn, engine noise, environmental emissions, and operating costs we've targeted make the Geared Turbofan engine the best solution forthe next generation of commercial aircraft." Last year, Pratt & Whifiey's Geared Turbofan engine was selected as the exclusivs power source for the new Mitsubishi Regional Jet and the proposed Bombardier CSeries. Both aircraft are expected to enter service in 2013., Airport Noise Report 30, 2008 ., �' �1 � � � • �' !� . � � � ; � .�•�;� John J. Corbett, Esq. Spiegel & McDiarmid Washington, DC Carl E. Burlesort Director, Office of Environment and Energy Federal Aviation Administration Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq. Gatzke, Diilon & Ballance Carlsbad, CA Peter J. Kirsch, Esq. Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP Denver Vincent E. Mestre, P.E. President, Mestre Greve Associates Laguna Niguel, CA Steven F. Pfiaum, Esq. McDermott, Will & Emery Chicago Mary L. Vigilante President, Synergy Consultants Seattle 65 In Brief ..-1 AirportNoiseMitigation Symposium Set The 8'� Annual Airport Noise Mitigation Symposium will be held on Oct. 12- 14 in San Antonio, Texas. Formerly known as the Sound Insulation Symposium, the conference is presented by the symposium planning committee and the American Associa- tion of Airport Executives. The conference brings together key players — FAA, airports, community groups, consultants, and manufacturers of sound insulation products — to share their collective experience. Information on the symposium agenda, which includes a tour of San Antonio International Airport's noise mitigation program, is available at www.noise-mitigation-s +�moosium.com. I'AA Approves Noise Maps On May 29, the FAA announced its approval of airport noise exposure maps submitted by Monterey Peninsula Airport District for Monterey Peninsula Airport. For further information, contact David Kessler in FAA's Western-Pacific Regional office; tel: (310) 725-3615. On the same day, the agency also announced its approval of revised future noise exposure maps submitted by the City of Fort Worth, Texas, for Fort Worth Aliiance Airport. For further information, contact Paul Blackford in FAA's Fort Worth office; tel:(81?)222-5607. New Noise Of�icers at NiiVV�A, Philadelphaa Michaei Jeck has been hired by the Metropolitan Washington Airports Commission (MWAA) as an understudy to Neal Phillips, Manager of Noise Abatement for MWA.A, who is preparing for retirement after long service with MWAA but says he will not retire in the next five years. MWAA is the proprietor of Washington Reagan Nationat Airport and Dulles International Airport. Jeck comes to MWAA from Philadelphia lnternationai Airpoi�t where he served as Airport Noise Abatement Program Manager for Philadelphia International Airport and Philadelphia Northeast Airport. Jeck's replacement in Philadelia is Jon Collette who comes from St. Peters- burg-Clearwater International Airport where he served as Supervisor ofNoise Affairs. Collette said that in his new position at Philadelphia, he wili be involved with a Part I50 airport noise compatibility study update, a capacity enhancement project, residential sound insulation program, and the FAA's NY/NJ/PHL airspace redesign project. AIRPORT NOISE REPORT Anne H. Kohut, Publ isher Published 44 times ayear at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashburn, V a. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703 )'729-4528. e-mail:editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price$750. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by Airport Noise Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA. % � ' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �C�� : •u�� •�- �inda Shipton, Senior Secretary SUBJECT: Updates for Introduction Packet Please replace the following pages in your ARC Introduction Packet Table of Contents Operations North of the 090° Corridor Boundary (put with #14) The following should be replaced from your monthly ARC Meeting Agenda Packet. # 7 Airport Noise Report — Put the latest issue of this in your Intro Packet #13 April 2008 - Technical Advisors Report #14 April 2008 - Eagan Mendota Heights Corridor Report ,,. ,' ', � ,, , '', �` � •'. ' • • .► ' • �' •. ' • • • � � Minneapolis-St. Paul International Rirport ��`'� � � � �: � *This report is for informational purposes only I and cannot be used for enforcement purposes. ; a Mefropolitan Airports Commission 3209 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in April 2008 2901 (90.4%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor � . � 3209 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations 2901 (90.4°/a) Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 05/07/2008 13:19 Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission 109 (3.4%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During April 2008 Of Those, 0( �jReturned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendofa Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Repo�t Generated: 05/07/2008 13:19 r�� Metropolitan Airports Commission 199 (6.2°/o) Runway 12� and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were South of the Corridor (South of 30� Localizer) During April 2008 Of Those, 0.( —)Returned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 05/07/2008 13:19 Page 3 �. C- C Metropolitan Airports Commission 8(0.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5° South of the Corridor (5° South of 30L Localizer) During April 2008 I�, � } i "". ''��_ L_._J J� ; a! �' y °' I C�� _. ��1� .__ ` `�—!�'�`.`_"_._."�� ---�%; �,��,�, �.`i,.� ;'��,..., ��.,,�.�-''� ( —� �� f , ' r,r� ` �y� � ,4�i� � "� �� ' �M „ , i.. p 1 4 ;: �(� �M � , . �1� I�._.._._ � � �� F„�.' '�. J4t 7.c��t ,`�''t�t,� �.v��c �!E � �, � � \` �,r''"" �i � E ' f r �1 � a � t � �,f 3 �.�. �� i : ��.. �...�._. �C �� ;�f i �` :. F a�,.� -�� ''�;�.� � �;i ':ry F. in�ra:tnnt �.r. _ ..j; t----rr-----� .r .., .�.... .,C„, . :�, ^'� . ..� �•�..... „ _ . ,�7 f ;�' ' . � r,� ��{ri , . �iS� (�'� x � M�� ' ��'+t1'l.t.tj �esl �.-�--•—�- Si + „"' 7__......_.--.a'`., �' rr'� t .. ,A L� ( � , � w. � n ..�t.� 2' f �' "` ��,ri � F entlala�e d�� r.�i�� ° ''1 f d�� Ga � `�� $ , � ,.�i (t_ � , . , � f � L...� �� f r` � � ( � � � � 1 f��,��; �� t (� a�ct��eld �9 =� �'j� � � � `r> ! }� r ; i ( ; � �d �t � . � � �� tinfi..A �� " �is��..� g t'�� C � �, � , ,R�,� i ,� �, �"/ ��.�---� � ._ � � �:�� .� z� � �,�u� .� �� I�� , 0 , � j ; � � ?�.�'+y � [.�] a �� l�" j � 4 t ' �� i+� '�ti. � � � ^'"'t�/'�' j �/E`o&�ig�az� ;` ��'.,�1��(: !!�/ �t .� ,�� i`tiv.'` t �' '� �' 1* x`+'' %'-ti.7` ��l f "�'y y� ` ` �. :� a .�,�%�� ^�� (�f1� . � � ��'�` �� , �" .7 ; ,�` ��te:."�•�s�P:,��.� ` Y i:��13'!n �r.� . 5��y.*\.��: � . �,.e ...., . rr �'f 1� w.,.,,,.i� .s 1 �, �'e:_,�. t._/I 1.� L_.:'=r�� - ...., �!..d � f �1 . . ��'. �. 4 j� - .�� zi " ��'� '��I �� #�(��` l rt, ,�p�` {y �Y �_J` � 47 . 4 ��,_..7 � .._1..:7'�f �' t �.%� .f i '� Sir ��' :tf i� �.� � �r y �� !" j'� �k� .�%` 4` '�� .,� ��.,.. , ��4 ai .�,�,� • � � , (t` �.� (N},, � �L �� `E� �{ (�., n � ^�� ,.�.. � � . ,� . �� int Paui P Ls.?� q. ��. +�,� ,{�i j�; , It �l � Page 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 05/07/2008 13:19 �l Metropolitan Airports Commission -- Top 15 Runway 12L/12R Departure Destinations for April 2008 , ��Air orE � � Cit� , ' ` Heacling= , ' ' , ' Percent af� , � , �� t ,,, .� ,�p ; y Y , n �deg ) #O�s, 'Total Ops, � � � � � �. ,�, ,,, .:,,� ,r,...=, „ . ,., . . ,... ,.. ..:... � ..,.. �:i _,.. , ,., . ,.,. < : ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 114 3.6% FAR FARGO 312° 87 2.7% SEA SEATTLE 278° 74 2.3°/a DTW DETROIT 105° 74 2.3% LAX LOS ANGELES 23$° 67 2.1 % YYZ TORONTU 95° 63 2% BIS BISMARCK 291 ° 60 1.9%a ATL ATLANTA 149° 59 1.8°/a LAS LAS VEGAS 243° 56 1.7% SFO SAN FRANCISCO 251 ° 56 1.7% DLH DULUTH 19° 56 1.7% GFK GRAND FORKS 316° 54 1.7% YWG WINNIPEG 330° 51 1.6% BOS BOSTON 97° 50 1.6% GRB GREEN BAY 90° 48 1.5% � C �� _ C Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 05/07/2008 13:19 Page 5