11-12-2008 ARC Packet1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
�
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
AIRPORT RELATIONS COIVIMISSION AGENDA
November 12, 2008 — City Hall Conference Room
Call to Order - 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call
Approval of the Minutes from the October 29t�', 2008 Airport Relations
Commission Meetings.
Unfnished and New Business
a. Discussion of 2009 NOC Worlc Plan
b. Update on Cities Meetings.
c. Discussion of December Meeting.
d. Updates for Introduction Book.
Acknowled�e Receipt of Various Renorts/Corresnondence:
a. MAC 2009-2015 Capital Improvement Program
b. September 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Report
c. September 2008 ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor
Analysis
d. Airport Noise Report, October 31, 2008
e. Airport Noise Report, October 24, 2008
Other Commissioner Comments or Concerns
UncominS Meetings
MAC Meeting
City Council Meeting
NOC Meeting
Plat�ning Commission
8. Public Comments
9. Adiourn
11-17-08 1:00 p.m
11-18-08 7:00 p.m.
11-19-08 1:30 p.m
11-25-08 7:00 p.m.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in
advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make
every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be possible on short notice. Please
contact City Administration at (651) 452-1850 with requests.
�
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MITINESOTA
AIRPORT RELATIONS COIVIMISSION MINUTES
October 29, 2008
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on
Wednesday, October 29, 2008, at 7:00 p.m., in the Large Conference Room at City Hall,
1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota.
- The following Commissioners were present: Liz Petschel, Chair; Robin Ehrlich, Vice
Chair; Bill Dunn, Joe Hennessy, Sally Lorberbaum, and David Sloa.n, Commissioners.
Also present were: Rich Feely, Goodrich; Ultan Duggan, Councilmernber; Jim
Danielson, City Administrator; Ja1ce Sedlacelc; Assistant to the City Administrator; Tim
Butell, chief pilot NWA; John Bergman, Apple Valley City Councilmember; and
Amanda Staple, Recorder.
Not Present: Ly1e Odland, Commissioner:
Annroval of 1V�inutes
Commissioner Lorberbaum requested a conection to the minutes of September 10, 2008,
l on page two, iirst paragraph, it should state, no maps had been published "showin
)
-- Visitation School..."
She stated that on page two, the third paragraph, it should state, ". .. during development
of properties in Mendota Hei�hts."
She stated that on page three, the second to last paragraph, it should state, "...send a thax�lc
you note to the people for their attendance at the ARC ineeting."
She stated that on page four, the first paragraph, it should state, "...three times lar er�than
that of a 747."
A motion was made by Commissioner Sloan, seconded by Commissioner Dunn, to
approve the minutes of the September 10, 2008, ARC meeting as submitted. The minutes
were approved with abstention of Commissioner Sloan, who had been absent.
Unfinished and New Business
A. Introduction of Joe Hennessy.
Not discussed.
� B. Presentation by Rich Fee1y on Aircraft Innovations.
,� ,
Commission Meeting — October 29, 2008
Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission
Rich Feely, Goodrich, advised that he was present at the meeting as a private citizen and �
not a represeniative of Goodrich. He stated that he has been with his current company for �"
16 years and has a bacicground in mechanical engineering. He stated that he currently
works to develop new systems that would go onio an aircraft, ranging from air data
systems to cabin pressure. He stated that on the Dreamliner passenger plane you would
feel more comfortable on the plane because of the change in pressure and humidity. He
explained that most planes today are made of aluminum compared to the composite
material that the new plane is made of, therefore giving the new plane the advantage of
allowing more oxygen and humidity. He advised that the lighting systems on the plane
would also simulate daylight according to the tirne zones that you travel through, and
explained that it would be compressed but should help create the feeling of going through
a day. He advised that this plane would also eliminate the need to travel through a hub,
which would allow for more direct routes to Europe and Asia. He advised that the new
plane is also amazingly quiet, and exceeds stage four engine requirements.
Commissioner Ehrlich questioned how many of the planes Northwest would be buying.
Rich Feely advised that 20 had been ordered with the option to buy another 20 planes. He
advised that the plane is a true wide body, and would allow for a more spacious ride.
Chair Petschel questioned what it would be like for pilots to fly the new plane.
Tiin Bute11 advised that the navigation system could not really be improved upon by ��
much but stated that the cocicpit would now be wireless, the 1cd's would produce less ��.
heat, the clarity of �he scr�ens uiould Ue i�n�:,roved, a.nd �BAS wauld be installed.
Rich Feely advised that in flight entertainment would also be installed on the new aircraft,
including wireless internet and telephone service.
Councilmember Dugga.n questioned how the change in the noise level occw-red.
R.ich Feely advised that noise is because of the air being pushed through the blades at a
high speed, along with the harmonics of the engine size. He explained that by changing
the way the air flows through the engine, the speed of the blades, and use of composite
material that absorbs the noise.
Councilmember Duggan questioned if the change was based on fuel consumption or
noise complaints.
Rich Feely advised that it was noi only for the inereased fuel consumption and emission
purposes but also for noise reduction. He stated thai the engines at talce off are very quiet.
He thought that once people start to fly on these new planes there will be a push in the
next decade to replace older planes with aircraft with the newer technology. He
explained thai airlines are currently getting rid of the older planes and would be then
%
�
�
Commission Meeting — October 29, 2008
Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission
keeping their newer planes. He explained that a larger plane could be made quieter than a
small plane, because of the size of the engine being used.
Tim Butell questioned if the same technology used in this engine could be made smaller
and still inaintain the quietness.
Rich Feely thought that they would be able to malce it smaller but did not thinlc that it
would be noticeably quieter than the engine that is already in place on a plane of that size.
Commissioner Ehrlich questioned what the cost of the 787 would be.
Rich Feely advised that the cost of the frame would be $160,000,000; two engines at
$5,000,000 each for a total of $10,000,000; paint would be $500,000 to $1,000,000; and
the interior would cost varying arnounts because it is completely custom. He advised that
Boeing has a class of jets that people fly as business jets, and explained that the interior
could have anything from a hotel suit to a conference room installed.
Commissioner Lorberbaum questioned if the piastic material was lighter.
Rich Feely confirmed that the composite material is lighter, and has been used on military
planes for the past 20 years. He advised that you could pound on the shell with a hainlner
and you would not be able to even dent the exterior. He advised that the difference in the
weight of the plane also allows for less fuel consumption, probably 30% less.
� � �_� ,
� Coinmissioner Dunn stated that some problems had occurred during the assembly portion
of the projeci.
Rich Feely advised that the gluing together of the sections had been a problem at one
time.
Chair Petschel questioned if there was anything in terms of safety aizd security that malces
it better in those areas.
Rich Feely advised that a lot of those things are speciiic to the airlines. He stated that
there is nothing that would be new to this aircraft that you could not have on other
aircrafts. He explained that the interior is completely custom and anything could be
added.
Commissioner Lorberbaum questioned what the competition to this plane would be.
Rich Feely advised that the 787 would be in flight within the next year, with a baciclog
going into 2013. He advised that the response from airbus was not to respond and instead
were going to develop the A350. He explained that they feit it would be more beneficial
to go this route than to try to develop a similar version of the 787. He advised that with
the 787 an airline could buy two 787s and run two routes to the same location rather than
( � sending an A380 at half capacity.
Commission Meeting — October 29, 2008
Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission
Chair Petschel questioned if an A380 could fly out of here with full capacity. �
(,
Rich Feely advised that it could not, and explained that a modification would need to be '
made in order to allow that.
Councilmember Duggan questioned if there would be any way that personal wireless
devices used on board the plane would be able to jam the pilot's ability to navigate.
Rich Feely advised that would not be possible. He advised that the reai reason you are
not able to use a cellular telephone on a plane is because it does not lcnow which cell
tower to use from the ground and bounces around between several towers. He then
displayed a video on the 787 and its production and testing.
Chair Petschel questioned who would handle the maintenance of the 787.
Tim Butell advised that most lilcely it would be the manufacturer but it would depend on
the airline.
Rich Feely stated that the real trend in aerospace is in the air taxi category, which would
hold about six to ten passengers. He advised thai it allows for business travelers to fly
into and out of small airports on small planes, similar to a charter but for small groups of
flyers. He advised that the ben�fit would be service similar to that of a taxi and the
omission of having to check into a large airport and go through security. He advised ihat �
this iype of plane is already in baciclog. �. '
Commissioner Lorberbaum questioned if that trend would cause problems in the corridor.
Chair Petschel explained that they lzave already had problems with the regional planes
staying in the corridor and advised that they would need to stay vigilallt in tlleir efforts.
Commissioner Hennessy advised that this type of plane has a quieter engine and would be
allowed to fly over homes, similar to a private jet.
Col.uzcilmernber Duggan questioned if different types of fuel is used on the different types
of planes and how the airport would lcnow to provide that fuel.
Tim Butell advised that the planes talce a generic type of fuel and explained that the pilois
would not fly into an airport that did not have their specific type of fuel. He explained
that the navigation systems in place help to lceep the planes flying a trac as opposed to a
heading.
Chair Petschel thanked Rich Feely and Tim Butell for attending the meeting tonight and
providing the Commission with the information that they had wanted to learn more about.
�
( '
Commission Meeting — October 29, 2008
Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission
Rich Feely advised that more information could be found on the website,
www.boeing.com.
Commissioner Ehrlich questioned what causes a pilot to go off track.
Tim Butell advised that the wind is increased at higher altitudes and could push a plane
off track. He explained that pilots would hold a heading rather than a path, and advised
that tlle new technology, RNAV, would help to correct for the wind.
Cornmissioner Hennessy advised that there is going to be a transition period while the
airlines switch to that technology. He advised that some pilots will be flying with RNAV
while others are still using the old technology.
Tim Butell advised that there would be a trial period and stated that Northwest is the firsi
airline to conduct the trial. He thought that the addition of Chair Petschel and
Councilrnember Duggan to the NOC has been a great benefit and has also helped to
develop relationships between the different Commissions.
C. Update on Cities Meetings.
Chair advised that she would lilce to table this issue until the December meeting.
D. Updates for Introduction Boolc
None.
Acl��o�vl�d�� R�c�iy�t �f Va�•ious ���oa�ts/Coa-a��s�aondeffice
A. Correspondence from MAC dated 9-19-08 & 10-17-08
B. August 2008 ANOM Technical Advisor's Repoi-t
C. August 2008 ANOM Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Col7idor Analysis
D. Airport Noise Report, September 5, 2008
E. Airport Noise Report, September 12, 2008
F. Airport Noise Repoi�t,
G. Airport Noise Report,
H. Airport Noise Report,
I. Airport Noise Report,
J. Airport Noise Report,
September 19, 2008
September 26, 2008
October 3, 2008
October 10, 2008
October 17, 2008
Other Commission Comments or Concerns
None.
5
Commission Meeting — October 29, 2008
Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission ,
Upcomin� Meetin�s
m MAC Meeting — November 17, 2008 —1:00 p.m.
• City Council Meeting — November 4, 2008 — 8:30 p.m.
m NOC Meeting — November 19, 2008 —1:30 p.m.
s Planning Commission — November 25, 2008 — 7:00 p.m.
Public Comments
None.
Adjourn
A motion was made by Commissioner Sloan, seconded by Commissioner Dunn, to
adjourn ihe meeting at 8:30 p.m. It was approved unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
Amanda Staple
TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
�
:, � ,' �
'.
,�
� �-�
��, .�
� � �::
�.�
�Crr�''Ct' :'±�f'}' ��(3i4'E�'`if`�^y
neapolis/St. Paul international Airport (MSP)
iVoise Oversight Committee (IVOC)
11 • ' ' •, •' ' �
. ;� , � � � ••� •.
a. Review Residential Noise Mitigation Program Implementation Status
b. Update on Community Implementation of Policies on Residential
Developmenfi in the 64 to 60 DNL Noise Contours
� �; �-� - � � �-
a. Runway 12�/30R Reconstruction Communication Plan
b. 2008 Actual Noise Contour Analysis
c. Implementation of Northwest Airlines Runways 12L, 12R and 17 RNAV
Departure Procedures
d. Implementation of Runways 12�, 12R and 17 Public RNAV Departure
Procedures �„ � _
e. Evaluation of the Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) Procedure at MSP
f. Transition to New Flight Track Data Acquisition System and MAC Noise
and Operations monitoring System (MACNOMS)
g. Develop MACNOMS System Enhancement Plan
h. Review Status of FAA Center of Excellence/PARTNER Initiatives
i. Global Pasition System (GPS) S�S-4000 Ground Based Augmentation
System (GBAS) Installation
j. Annual Scheduled Nighttime Operations Assessment ,.��}
k. Review of Aircraft Fleet-mix Trends at MSP following Delta Airlines'
Acquisition of Northwest Airlines
I. Monitor Ground Operations and Related Noise on West Side Ramp Areas �.;,,c,l 1��,I
m. Study Effects of Ground �evel Noise to Determine if a Structure or Land �
Form can Mitigate Noise 2��-'^�`��
n. Analysis of Runways 12� and 12R Departure Turns at Three Miles � ���
o. Review of Runway 35 River Visual Approach Procedure ��� ��
! ` • ' `' '
.
a. Continue to Review Input Received from the Public Input Meetings as
Possible Agenda Items
r�
(
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�
November 7, 2008
TO: ARC Commissioners
FROM: Linda Shipton, Senior Secretary
SUBJECT: Updates for Introduction Packet
Please replace the following pages in your ARC Intraduction Packet
Table of Contents
Operations North of the 090° Corridor Boundary (put with #14)
The following should be replaced from your monthly ARC Meeting Agenda Packet.
+r 7 Air�a�i �oise Repart — Put the �atest issu� of thi� in yo�r Intro Packet
#13 September 2008 - Technical Advisors Report
#14 September 2008 - Eagan Mendota Heights Corridor Report
C�
Section
l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.*
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13. *
14. *
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Glossary
Historical Review Eagan-MH Corridor
Creation of ARC
Ordinance No. 290
ARC Brochure .
2008 Airport Noise Pla.n of Action
Airport Noise Report, Ocfiober 31, 2008
NOC Bylaws
NOC Meeting Minutes
MAC Approved 2008 Capital Improvement Program
What's New at the MAC Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs
ANOMS Monthly Reports
September 2008 Technical Advisor's Report
September 2008 Eagan Mendota Heighis Corridor Report
Frequently Aslced Questions
Contract Pertaining to Limits on Construction of a Third Parallel Runway
Crossing in the Corridor
Minneapolis Tower Operational Order
Runway Use
Nighttiine Voluntary Noise Agreements
Maps
ARC DVD
* These items should be replace witli updates provided in your montl7ly ARC pacicet
C. .
Metropolitan Airports Commission
108 (3.3%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During September 2008
Of Those, 0( �jReturned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 10l08/2008 09:17
V �
'L ;' �° ' � . , �.. .�. �. , ; �. . �
oat�� gq�H
y�� -� �
?� '� ya
x j r
...1�. y
m A o
t t N
'a y y
q �
��� 6S
ryM1't �npot*K 7 c
t�cta��r 3�, �008
Minrtea�olis��aint Pau1 InternatYt�n�I AYtp�rG
fiO4U - 2�tti Avenue South • Minneapolis, MN 5545U-279�
Phonc (6�2) 7z(i-R1Uq
�1P� Mailing i�eci�ients
RE: 2(1�19-2Q1� CAPITAl. IMPFtt�VEMENi PRt7GRAM
METR�QPQ�.ITAN AIRP�RT� ��fMM(��ICyCJ (f1t1AC)
Ta Whom tt M�y �onGem:
The prapo�ed funding plan ft�r the dr�ft 2009 C�pitai Irnprav�ment Program will be p��s�r►t�d by
�tev� �usch, MAC's i��puty Ex�c�fiv� Dir�ct�ar �f Financ� and Adrr�ini�tr�tiv� �ervice�, at f37e
�I�rverni��r 4, �GO$, Fin�r�c�, a�v�Ic�pment, and Environment m�eting.
Att.ached far yaur ir�forrn�ti�r� i� � caPy of ttr� meetin� ag�r�d� and tt�e merna witf�r �xhiE�its
r�g�rding the MAC's 2pp�-2015 Ca�pi��l Irr�prc�v�ment Prograrr�.
�inc�r , ,.
.--� t
Ra�bert J. Vorpat�t, P'.E.
�r. F'roj�ct M1ana�ertPr��r�m Developm�nt
F�.N!(rk
Attachment
cc: D�nnis Prabst, MAG
�ary W�rren, MA�
CIl� Fil�
Fd&� l�acket File
'1'he Metropolitan Airj�oela Cpmmi� inn iy an �Ffirm�tivc acdon enlFloyett
www,mspairp�rt.com
Ic�4;<•.��rni,1,or��: 1�]IiLAKE •ANOKwCOUN'tY/Ri„a1NF. •C'.KXSIAL �FLYINGClAUD �LaKF.F.T.Mn ��iAINi i%�ULL7UWNTUWN
, � � i' . i' ' ,-;� - ''�
� ' '� ' � :
FINANGE aEUELt�PMEI�T AND ENVfI�t�NMENT Ct�MMiTfEE
Bert Mci�C�sy, FD&E Cf��ir .
Li�a peiten, FD&E Vio� �hair .
dan Boivin, H{�'JAA Ch�ir
Tam �c�l�y .
Timot[�y �eisl�r
Mike �andy, M & C.) Ch�ir
Jack l.�rrn�rs, �ammission Chair
aabert M�rs
Rc�bert Nelsot�
Mc�tly �igel
.J�hr� Williams
METf�t�PC��ITAN AIFiPQ�RTS CC7MMI�SIU�J �
�JOTI�E t�F RE�Ul.AI� NlEET1NG
FINAN�E, DEVELQPMENT ANC� ENVIf�Cr�IMENT +CdMIV11TT�E
Wednesd�y, Navert�'��r 5, 2008, �10:00 a.m.
E�oom �048A►, Lir�dbergh T�rmin�l
Woid-Ghamberlain Fielci
Minrrea�po[i�-St Paul in��rr�atian�l Alrp�arE
AC�EN�►A
•. ,.
The apen F�rurn i� a por6c�n r�f the Gommiitee meeting where. p�rsons wi[i be afiawed ta address ��
Go�mmitte� c�n sul�je�cts wl�ri� �re r�gt a part �of the mee#ing agenda. �pe�k�r� ar� �sked tcs limit #heir
r�mark� to twr� et7inutes Each. Per��n� wi�hing t+� ��e�k rnust c�mplet� a sign-u� card priar t� t��
�t��t of the m��#in�. Th� si�n-�rp c,�rd �houtd E�� giv�n #a any st��f �ersc�r�. Th� Camrniite� rnay take
��fii�n �ar r�pty at th� tim� vf ihe staternent ar may give dir�ction tQ staff �t th� �nd of tf�� rn�efing
regardinc� inv�tig�#ir rt of the concem� express�d.
F'I.��LI� HEARING
20Q� —�095 CAF'ITAL 1MPRt�VEM�NT F'f�.t�GRAM pUBLIG HEARING — A�SE�SMEtVT�
4F Et�VfR�C7tUMENTAL �FFECT� .
C�DNSE�JT
�. F�EPfJFi,TS
a. �`�c��u�rter �udg�t Varianc� RepQrt
b. �tatem�nt� of Rev�nu�s and E�aer�ses a�nd Ch�ng�� in Net Ur�restricted C��h —
��p�t�mber 2008
c. A�c�►u��s Receiv�able Summary
d. Inve�tment PortFalic, Report
e. Air Carriers Passenger �acility Charg�s F�epc�rt
f. +�ommissi�on Travcl f��portlJuly, August, S��temb�er 20U8
g. Change Man�gem�r�t Policy ��d P�`oject �ta�iu� R�pork
h. Blaomir�gtcan �and Acquisition S#a#us Re�art
�teve Busch, Depufy �xecutiv� Dire�tor— Fir�ance and Admini�#r�#ive �ervic�� ��
Denr�is Probst, [7e�►uty Executive dir�ctc�r — Pianning and Environm�nt
3. FINAL PAl'MEN"f - MAC ��7NTE;ACT •
a�. Lin�lb�rgh Terminal HVA� M�dific�tiar�s
G�ry �. VV�rren, air��ior - Airpor� d�ve[opment
4. BID� RECEIVED - MA� Ct3�JTR�ACT�
�. 2�08 Miscellaneaus M¢diticafions
b. �rystal Airport - 20os t�bs#ru�tians RemQv�ts
c. {��en Ar�hitectur� �3uildinc� Automati�n (�1ABA)
Ga�ry G. Warrerr, I�ir�ctor- Airport Devei�pment �
5. �lt�1�E L.ITI�ATI(7N Ct7NS�1'+)T aECREE -�TATII� OF +C(7MMU1r11T`�' Pt�LI�IE� C7N
RE�iDENTIAL DEV�Lt,�F�MEPdT fN THE 6�4 Td 6a ClNL f�lt�i5� Ct�tVTCy�IRS ANC1 MAC
MITI�ATIt�f� �BLICATIt�N� . �
Ghad E. ��qve, M�nag�r - l�viatian Nai�e and Sat�itite I�rograms
6. JGDECAUX A1F�PC)R7 INC. +�APITAL EXPENSE AUDIT FtEF"t�RT
Micha�i Wiilis, Assistant Dir�ctr�r - Int�rnai Audit
DISCUSSIQN - ACTIQ►N �
7. PRC?.�EGT BUD�Ei' AD�U�TM�t�T •
G�ry G. Warr�n, Directae- Airpo�E Devetopm�rrt
Ei1�GUS�IC►N - INFt�RMATICIN
$. 2�09 MA� !�lTEFifJAL AUG11T DEPARTMENT ANt�lUA� PLAN
Micha�l W611is, A��ist�nt E?ire�crr �- lnterna) �udit
Q. t�t�FT ,��Ct9 �PE�'„ATI�!� B�!��=L�"!" l�P�A-.TE
�teve Busch, Deputy Ex�cvtive air�cia�r - Financ� and Admini�tr�tive �ervi�ce�
'80_ PFdELIil�1t�11P�R'Y 20a9 �APII`AL IfVI!'!�+(�VEiViEhJi Pi�C1Gi;,4iV1 �U{�DIi�IG PIJ�h�
�tev� Busch. De�uty Execuhv� CDire�tor-� Firi�nce and Adminis#rative Services
� 1. S�'�G9AL FliwlA;i��E, DEV�L�PMEPdT. Af\9D ENVIE�,Cii�MEl\4�' �t�h/IMl t—t �� M��l'Id�t�
Dennis Prabst, Deputy �xecutive E3i��ctor - Pt�nnin� and Enviranm�nt -
EXEGUTIVE �E��I�1►y
1�. FC.7REST MEAal�Vtf Al�AFZTM�hJT� LITIGATIC7N "
ihoma� W. Ander�t�n, Gen�ral +Cciun�el
D�nnis Probst, Q�puty Executive Dir�ctt►r - Pl�nning and �nvironrner�t
M�teri�ts far this meeting �ir� �v�il�t�l� at th� f�allowing w�bsite:
www.rtisr�airc�t�tt.com/m2�clm�e#inqs/fde.aspx .
� ,i, i. � �.
�ta� �y th� infarmafion b+�o�th near the tram station an the Tram ��vel. At the ir�formati�r, boath, yau
will b� asked tQ complete a securi�iy checkpaint acce�s form and sht�w v�lid, �avernm�nt iss��d
photo id��t�c�tion, such as a driver's license. T�k� your Gomplet�d a�ces� form witt� you up iw�
fi4urs, t�► the TiGlc��in� L�v�l �ecurity ch�ckpaints. Shc,w yc��r �pprQveci access f�rm ta se�urity
checkpC►int �et�onnei. You will th�n be scre�ned just �s i� yau were traveling. Access forms ar� anly
valid for the pur�Qse of attending ��ut�lic MAG meeting at a parti�ui�r date and �ime.
Gommissit�r► Chaml��rs �r� tocat�d on �h� M��z�nirte Lev�l �dveclaQking the airperrt`s centrai shopping
�r�a (above �hili"s Rest�ur�xnt)� �r�st th� m�in security checkpoir�ts. .
Aliow yourself �t l��st �1� rriinut�s xa park, camplete the ac.�s� ft�rrr� �nr� ��t #hr�rugh the s�curity
ch�ckpoin� priQr ta th� meetin�.
Parkinq will be v�►lidat+�8: r�L��s� brii�q vt�ur parkina ticket to tF�� Yn�+e'Eir��.
Directio�n� to �Ehe Tr�rt� L�vel tn'farmation B4oth
Prom sha►rt t�rm parkin�: Af. fh� LindE�ergh 'ierminai �ntrance, tak� the escalatar or �I�v�tar d�wn
to th� Tr�am Level. The inform�tion baoth is straight ah�ad, �n tf�e �cent�r c�f th� ra�m.
Fr+�m �enera�l parking: Irt y�u p�rk ir, the �31ue �ar I�ed r�mps, iake the elevator +d�wn t� the tram�
wwiiieh will fr�r�s�ort yau dir�ctly t+� the Lindbe:rgh Termin�l's Tram Level. When yc►u �*�at tE�e irarn� tE�e
infarma�on 4�4� is straight �h��d, ir, the c�n4�r of tl�� rQQm. If you ��rk irt fihe t�r��n �r �+a8d �
r�m�as, t�ke ih� �kyw�y tc� the Lindber�h T�rminaPs M�zzanine L�vel. Fram th�re, take an e(ev���r �,, _. _
�r �s�alator #o i rarn Level. I he infQrma�ion bo�th i� �ir�ighY �Y���d, i� �E�� ��n��r �f fh� r+�oen.
�
� ,.� > '. 1
TC7►: Finance, Development and Envirt�c�mer�t Commi�t�e
�R�1M; �t�ve Busch, De�uty �xecutiv� air�ctar — Fin�nc� c� Administrativ� �ervices
(69 2-7�6-814$) .
.,�."iUBYJIE�`iT: PF���IMINAF�Y 2009 CAPITAl. IMPROVEMENT PF�,t7GF'�M FUNC�IhtC P"LAN
G1ATE: C7ctob�r 29, 2aQ$ �
Att�ct�ed for yaur revi�w is th� prelimin�ry [7raft �a0� -- 2d� � Funding for th� CtP. This process is skili
under review. �taff wifi be �vailable far q��stions at th� FD & E Committ�� meeting.
11VFt�RM�TIC+NAL ONLY; NO CQNIMITTEE A�YIC+�1 aEQ1.lE�TED
�'
' `
' �� � ��� ���� ���, , .� '�� ����� ��. , a �� �� �
F� m m m ai ,- •.- n v� oo cv uf a �' � r. ti' .
u.l
���,,. �.� ��� , ,.$,,,� ,,; , , �� � .
a �w �
� ��.� . . 1 . �
d 1 .
� � � � � � � � � � . � � i � � � � � , � �' � �° � i � � � � � � �
� E � , • � . , r ' � eS e'S ' ' vf �l'
� . •
m� � �� � � „� g�,�,.� $S '�8,,� �fi � ,� �� �,
" � ' ' ' � � I I � �� � ( T
�
� I (
� �� . . .,$� .,.., ., .,.�� , .;�� � ., �
4 ,� • I • 'I ' t ,I , . � .. � '1 I � ,� I
. . � �� . . � . . �. . . . � . , , , � . . . . . . . � . , � . . . . ., . . � . . � . ( . . � .. . � . .
$ �, . . . . . . . . . . . .. . � . . � . , . , . � . , f . . � . � , . � � . .
m . ,� ( . � . '� , ,I '
- �i . � � p � �, �� I SS "� ��� c`f3$3 i �� � � � `�`,
�...., •� �� � � � � '4' '� ' ��_ � �� NI� � �� � ,� �
.�o �1 � �r
a o , � I
. . � 4�7 0� �� � i� � � rl � n i rl i � r: i � il � �� r � i i i� a �� � �I �1 � �I � �� i �
�� I
�� I �(� �� 1�� �� t 1• t r I 1 1 � f�D
• �aa •11 ��� , I1 �F I� � ' �• I I � I, ,� �.
�
• �d �� �t� ��� ���� g��,, . .� �� w���� i�53 • m �� �� N
• ' ����„� R ei m ra R cS� di w v� ti .r a �J'
E ' � ^ ^ ^
d •
. _
� E � H = '
� � � � �Q E �' �� � ��� �
. � 4 � �� E r �
a E RR
� c ��
� �� �}}_��[[,, �����
c
L� � 1. G .`r- .h 1� � �
E �� ���'�� � �'�.�� - j .
y g '�g � � .� � p
gg y a �
. O � � �p p�'�����t� � ��� ��� � E � �� � �� tg �� 8
... ' � � ���g��3dyf�.�����.ct�� ����� � ����y�, � � �� ��3�� �
. � m R 'Ef' f� �L� � E 4= �u �i � � '� � 'C � � � '� � w � y�
, . . m� �z=�c�F-�� Z a ��,�o�,_s,��� ������� � � ���� �
' sa��� .��A���� �'����'�� .gL���� .~���,�a� axa��.������ �j� � ��
• $$.�'�$1 �'a �m�F-�—��m�t-a���G`��t- 0'� v � ' 9 �7i vi � �'��� �
' N R o., w � 1� � � ,7 � � � Tu
...1 . . , _ - j'.
C
o �J
~ u'I
�q;y
6
.5
�dd
_ °t
�
e�
' s al
0
0
�$�� $�,����g �� � ��� �� ��$�$�� �8
.- qj � N � � d fj� w Y�- N� .
C4
���'m �g�'���� �Y„�Y ���, �� ,$���� �
m.�� ��.����� ��.� ��� �� ��, � „�
, . � � � � � � � �y � � � � g � � � � i � c7, r7, S $
. 1 � I ��
i I �I
,�,��, ,,.: .. .$ ..��. �' ,
� j . . '� ' 'I.' '� (� '� ' . '� '�
�
. . . . , , . . . �. .� .� . .� . . . . . .� . .�.,
I I
I
, . . . . . . � . . . ,� . .� . .� , . . . , .� . .� .
I �. I
. � . . , . . . . .�� . . .'. .,.E. .�. . . . , .�. .�.
l
,. .....,�. .,���. .� ,�.. ......�. .�.
� �� I I
. . . . . . , . � . . , . � . . � . � . . � , � . . .' , . � .
I
����
� �� �$�� s�s����g ���.� ��� ��. ,��'g��� �� ���� ���
. ��� �� � ^� �
� ga . . �
.� .
� � $ � � .
• � �m�, �� � � � � � ��.
- �� � � ��+� . �� � �� �..�, �� ��
' � ���� } � � � � j�� � � ' �� A
� �a.(},� "+ a� � � � � ,r
' . Rs�� ��, � ¢c��� � � �m'�� � ������� � ���.
�' a3� � � �4' ¢+� � ��tV � � e ~�� s` � ��� � � � ���. � €i°+fa.�
� €�� � �' � �''� �a��� ��� �
r� � �� � � � � �
�� ���� �_�W������������.,������ �� ��_�'� � ���,�� z� �
' ��� �� ��. �� �? �� � ��� - �t��} "�'+� � � i�� �~�Mg = jY+� �
�� ��� w �w��4�! � ��S � o o'i m�j�m���C'�c�C� �Ft- �1S p,�5� �s ��+L
' •a°. � ' P Fa � �n e�' R
��q �� titi� n•
, .. � � ,
�� � � � � � � �
. , � W • 1 �� N
. � _ .
� 6 d
� � . 1 1 � � • .
Pl W � � � �" '
. ♦.� 1 1 � 1 - I � � N. �
���
�, �
. � . - � � �� � �� � �f ��� � ..
��, .�E. .�, ,�.i, . � .
. . � ��, . . , -.� .i . .
y ( �
} �
• � • � ql . a� � el e �{ �I � g �
I
, � r�li �� � il ��� 'a7
• ST
U ^ , •
• �a�
i o � � ' .�
. , �g�� , .! � .� , . ,� ,� . m . �
, � ��� �$ wh� � ��. , .� ..�,��. � �
, . ��� � � � �� N �
; �
� E
I . � s. ' s
��� �
. � � ��
. � � �� � �g������� �
�� � ��������,���v
� �� � �� �� �� �� w:m�� �
� �� ��. ��� � ,����� �
� � � � ���� �E
�� � � $�a3� � � g ����� W������ _ �
�� ���'� �� .��� � ��������.����� �
I � � � 'w iu h
. � o! b
' W M1 . "
�; .
t
�
e
��
a '� o
4 �^
� R
•Ea
�� �� ���� ���.....�. ��8� a�•��� ���$ ��� atd �� �� •�
� ry r� e. w y m r �
� - .
y`{ � � t 1� y3 � � 1�4 � 1 1� i�^ t I 1 1 1 '1 .� r i• 1 � � 1. • 9' 4 Y
N
1 Yl 1 1 N • a{ �' • • • � � • • • • . r i , �
. dJ f
�� � �� ,�� �� ��� ��•� ����,� g
., �.�� ������
�, , �
.. . .... �.� , ,��$ � � � �� �i
. . . . . � . . � , � � � � � � � � � � � . � � •
. . .�. . . . � . � . � � � � � � � � : . . . .
. � , . .
6i� �� �.� ..� . e
� � �� �g�� �������• � �.- � ..��;$ , � �
. . . � � � . - , � . , � , � . , � � , � � .
�$ ���� ��������� ��� �� ,�. ..�. .� ...,. �,
. . N � � � m
� �� ���� �$,�..,�,� ��� �� ��� �.�g� �� ���C �i. g$ �
�
6 � p � E
�. � �� � ��' � �� � ����
. o �` � �'� �°'�'� �� � ' � $ s FB � „�
� '�a� � •� � �' ��� „ a $ �� a ���
� �� �€������ ¢y� �� ; � �� � �' � ��� ��9
� E � ��� �������A �� ����� � ��� �� ¢� ��� � � ,� ��� �
�9 � ` ��c�,?a����e i��� �� �E��� E� �$�'� R� ��'° ���5� �
. , a � � � ��- �� ��a �m � �
���� ���� �������� � �8�����..� b���� ��� ���� ����� ��� ��.��� � ��� � �
' . ' • .`�'v R � .�i � A � � � �
� ) . , '
�
_i
t
a
� �:•������. � ��.��.� �� ��� $� �a �•�� �m�
�. �
' r
���e ��,�•���� wWn � � � �, ��i
a a � ..- vi ' � o V. .r , . � � .
�,,� ���,���,� ���. �� . ..
� ,t� � �
„ , �„�...� s$ ,� ,, �s �� �„� ����
� .,,.,. ,� , , .,
„ „ , � „ .,
. . . . . . . � . . .
. � � � . � . � � � � � � . ,'�
i � � � � � � � � � . . � . . . � . � i . � � � � � �
. .�.� � � �,�'� �• g '� � .
��� ��.,,�� � . .. �
�
��8 �������� �� �$ �� ��� $g ,�� ���� � ���:} ��p �� ����� � •���(
tS F� t- t= t� N'�` M M ��+i �v cJ' . oK oti v N f'i 4 � V M N � 3�
' N
g
a � � 9 ffi , By�$� �
u , � y�
��� � � � � � � � � � . �� ��� �.���
� �� � LL�� s � d� � � E � ��� ��
��#;q � �a , �� � �� ���� � �� � �y���� �' � ����g������
� ,�. '�¢ ,�' ���'' �• ��g Tj� �� �a � .s88 �a� �+� $wW •�
�� :r'E� �� ��w� � d � �V �� ���$ ���� ��� _ ��� ow'���.'��� � y
ea =���5 � �_����.��'$ �Q����G �� �'� �w� ��� a��� � � . m����•
� 8]i '�� �7 €C�� ���3������ �� � ���� � �����3� ����
� � �0 ��m����� $.X o����m�a .wrl-mu.�.w�������9 � }- �a �
� = • - � ii � �ii � tt
9
C�
� u�s p� m ��n v�i v�i
4 � U7� Ifi Y �
�
oaa �
.� i � v�im�m
•I l 1 i l 1 1 • 1+ �
� .I, wl� ,,.�,
�, �
�I �� � .� . , . ,I ,
�.�� , � , ., ;I.
g� } ��i
�� ..i. .i. .,.�.
m� . .�,�,,g
� �I �f �.
b P � � � � � � � . . . � � �
0.� � •
6 �
4�r (�} 1� 1 f) 1 �� 1
S° a a
G Q [3 � DO �
�,��,- s $, �,�� Kt
� *t d vr �n r tv
���� . .
+� op o o a o 0 6 �d
00 oatn
v � $ � �fi �, $, �'i, a o_ � �n . _
N N t7 c� � cJ tv .s' �' O � .
� � � 1 1 � 1 � � ..
T
� 1 1 � \ t 1 • � 1 1 � '
.�� �I� �.�� ��� �����. �� .
�
�. �f� .� . . �� .� . .) .��� �I� .
. .i , .� . . ,i , ,� . .� .i .�. ,� .
. ,� , .i . . ,.�.� .� . .i .� .� .i
, �,�. .��� � .��. � .� , ������ ��
. . . , .i.�.� ��. _
1
II
I
1 / 1 � °)
� � 1 1 � I �
g�s �� g�S �� � � �
pd � 4�}' {j N N � P-' O C2 -
e- �J
.
� �� �
�� �
G �E���� � � €�� +�� �
S.. � c ��` �Ry �. g D3 .
���E $���2�i ��� � E
at g � � � C
�e � c � � ¢ � �j m d � . � � o, � � 0.
� �� ����� �a � � ' � �n�� � � �
��y ��p� ��� s�'���� �������,g������� �
°�o � ��_ �+��4 � m �� � � '9 77� �o �
aa�eZ i � a� .
�
;
;
� , ,.�s.�ONo�o , SM � �����f �.- ���� ��� � �j� $�sgm g � � ��@�� �
� ' �' � n1 ^ N� 4'� t� . I W • N N� CV CJ 4{ .� cC t�i .- u!
LL
m D ' � � ��n���i �75� �`� � � �v�o �' Q u� `� � �
i c c0 P( 4 M . 'V m N � �i � � ttS � `Y � �7r � �a . � � � i �
�= r�.- �- 4 r C'j r�- m r r �
��ly, ' '
$� , , ,����.�g �,m. . . . .�� � � � ���� �� , , , , , , , , , � . , .
� � . ,. � - �„ .- r m � ,� '
G b o io o M O v o0000 0
�, . . , , , . ��q , (y$a �� $ � � . . . .� . oi� oo�o.a �
N I N tU .' � N N C�i ���'S� �+ll� �IY ��. � I Y �( � O ID fD'V' FI'4'
� �- a-' r% ps C1� �- of
�� .�. . . . . . . ,� . . ; , . . . . .� . . .� .� .� .�;. .� . . . , . ,) . .� . , . . . .� ,
� � � . . . . , � . . .� . ... . . . , . ,� . : �,� . ..� ,� . ,� , , , . , .� . .� , , . . . ,� .
� �.d, , . . . . ,. . . .� . . . . . . , ,� , , .� . ,� .� . .� . . . . . .� . ,� , . ; . . .� .
�
��
� r 6
� � �
�a
a
0
p r
� 6
�
m � ��.
� aa
E
. . . . . . . . .� , . . , . . , . ..� . . .,� . . ..� ,! . .� , . . . . ,� . .� . . . . . ,� .
� .� . m� .,.��� ...,
. y � . � . : � . � � , � .. � � � � . � . . f �
� � � p� ♦ � 1 i t � t � �
� � � . � � � � �I � � . i � � � , �I � , �) � �� � �) . � � � i •� . � , � � � �I �
I I
Q pOp O o o ct �K'�,tQ�j�1�1 Oq 8O O 4 8 V� d o Q Q pp p p Q!�Vo} fQ,,�, Qt�
� � l,r d Vi O tit O Ll ��� PJ W V R' 47 O O a h O O S f] a O O Q � O � Y! PJ S' � 9'
O N v o ui n. � C� N m m m �n vi io in � y� O sa cy. i�
'r W N�` N 4Y i'i oo N N � CV S�( Vi r m m.- Qi
� � • . . �
� �° m
t�
..�� � �s�
�
� ���_�- ��.�g� � � � . � �`$��-
�
����� ����� ���$� �� �N � �.�� � ��� � � �����
� F �.�� �� �� � ���$� E � � � � ��x � ���,� ��� � �-�
t. ����FW�$� °aS' y � � L � � � ��. ���a � �w� E� .�,�� � �����
� � � �
�� ������� �� ������ �� �� �,€������������� � ���y �
$ �o �. � � ���'� � 3� - � om�-�� �� � ���'�-
� �� ��°������'� ��������� ����-��������g�����,���������
� , . ,� W . ,� �
^ , , �
r � a �
�.
�
�
L
� o o iS Cr Ci u Ci o 0 0 o Ci o a a a a a� u71
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v po a o 0 0 p (.�
� � fQ (p , Q m N � O N V7 O 0 O(*. h N[V N N(O C/
�= m ar ti-' ,= n c•1 � N;I �r ci ,c� • w e'¢� . .
1
� t .
� . .� �
�m� .,, . . , , ���� ��. .
.v,�u . , �^ . .
��� � .
� r�a o a ar� ' •
4y� � � m � � , � � r t�fi �d o � . � ��y $�v
� m Pl t'Y ' , �D N M M , • , • , h! N .
U r �I � •�q�lc�v Q� �I� �) � i r� � NIN 5����1�
�
� . ,� . . �.� . . . .� � ,+ . : .) .. � .� . .� .� ,��i -
� N�) .�1 � �.I � �� �� � �� . .�� � �1 � ,� �� �I �f .
( I I
�� . ,i . . . ,� , . . .� . .� . , .� , ,�. , .� .� .� .� .
�
�� . ��,�.. ��., ... ��: -,�. ..�. �,�. .�.�.���� �
��a � , . . . ���� .� . � .�� .� . �� ������
N T , � 1�
� � � , .
Q__ � 1�� 1 ! 1� . 1. 1� 1 �� �. 1 1� 1 1� • i� �� �� 1�
ra a . .
�,,t��nJJ .�� ��� aoN'� �� ��� �� ���� ,�,$, , , , . � �
��� c+Y r r N N �, m m m c� m p� tY � '�'� m
'� � a. � .
��� �
$
� � � � . . �.��� �
, E � � � � � �a�.����� �
�� � � E .� �
a � �. � ��� �
�� � a ��` � � ��� ��
a � � �� � m� � �� ,� � � 5;�,� �,m����
� � � � �. . � � � m.��N ��n�
� ���� ���.�� ���� ��.���� �� ���0.�e�����r�`� �
� �
� ��������� � �� �� ��� ��.�� ����.�����$�.��'� �
� ��a�c���vam��a�E��,��W�iz�r,ycsGi,��u�o3ra a
t� .m, + F', Td .'� � . .`S .fP, .
'Table of Contenis for September 2008
�-
Complaint Summary 1
Noise Complaint Map 2
FAA Available Time for Runway Usage 3
MSP All Operations Runway Usage 4
MSP Carrier Jei Operations Runway Usage � 5
MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition 6
MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 7
MSP Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 8
MSP Scheduled Nighttime Operators 9-11 (.>
MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operators by Type 12
MSP Top 15 Niglittime Operators Stage Mix 13
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracics 14-17
MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map 18
Time Above dB Threshold for Canier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 19
Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 20
Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 21
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 22
MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 23-35
_ �.
Analysis of Daily and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL 36-38
A Product of the Metropolitan Airports Commission ANOMS Program
MSP Complaints by City
September 2008
Number of Number of % of Totu1
Arrrval De artnre Other Com laints C
C��y .:, ' P. p omplainants , Complaints
MINNEAPOLIS I9 2G 12 ; 82 ;: 4G 459 G44 G7 15.6"/0
EAGAN 0 4 1016 741 IO 119 1$90 48 45.9%
13LOOMINGTON 1 0 21 42,; . 1 82 ' 147 22 3.6%
SAINTLOUISPARK 5 23 0 1' 0 ]6'` 45 14 l.i%
BURNSVILLE 1 Q 7 "':76 " 10 26 :r, 120 13 2.9%
APPLE VALLLY 0 140 : 5 , 7",. 5 33 190 11 4.6%
HE GHT3 0 0,. 6 13G `' 10 39 ,. 191 10 4.6"/0
SAINT PAUL t 0 1 2 � 6 y 10 5 0.2%
RICHPIELD 0 0 0 23 . 659 '' 4 686 4 1G.7%
LAKEVILLE 0 `'34 0 0'` 0 3 37 2 0.9°/n
EDEN PRAI.RIE 0 0.`: 0 0` 0 5:. 5 2 0.1%
EDINA 0 0, � ; �": . � 0. 5
2 O.I%
PALCON HEIGHTS 0 0 0 1 0 1
2 2 0%
CHANHASSEN 0 0. . 0 '.' 0,, 0 128 . l2S 1 3.1%
�ARMiNGTON 0 0' 0 5 0 0. 5 1 O.l%
W�3T SAINT PAUL 0 0 g p' 1 ' p' ' 4 1 0.]%
MINNETONICA 3 0 0 0 0 D. 3 1 0.1"/0
SUNTtSH LAKE 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 1 �%
[NV�RGROVG 0 ` 0 1 0 0 0 1 ] 0°/n
HEtGHTS
ROBBINSDALE I 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0%
SO PAUL �T � � � 1. � 0 1 1 0%
MINNETRISTA 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0%
ROSEMOUNT 0 0. . 0 0 0 1 1 I 0`%
Totnl - 259 2191 1669 . 4119 212
Notc: Shndcd Col�mns rcryrescnt MSP cvmpinints filcd vin thc Intemet.
Sum of % Totni of Compiuints may not cquul 100% duc to munding. �
'As oFMny 2005, thc MSP Compininu by City rcport includcs multiplc
'' � compinint ducriptors per individual camptnint. Thcroforq thc numbcr of
} campinint descriprors moy be more than the num6cr of reported compinints.
Time of Day
Time Total
OOUO-0559 54 78
0600-0G59 28 82
0700-1159 368 574
1200-1559 49l 321
1600-1959 544 719
?000-2159 214 252
2200-2259 139 2T7
2300-2359 ]3 25'
Total 4119
Repart Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24 ' � '
MSP International Airport
Aviation Noise Com�laints for Se�tember 2008
Number of Complaints per Address
�;.
m � �
1-6 7-15 16-30 31-47 48-111 112-128 129-175 176-1006 t '
- 2- Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Available Hours for Runway Use
September 2008
FAA Avera e Dail Count
September"2007 September 2008
Air Carrier 746 725
Commuter 398 422
General Aviation 42 45
Military 9 7
� 1 ` Total - 1194 1.200
-- Note; Sum of daily average count may not equai total due to round(ng.
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24 - 3-
All Operations
- . - •-•• -. - •- ��:
Last Year .
'Arrival! Count Count . Last Year
12WY Deparfure Overfligh,t Area :. ',,:Operations:: Percent Operafioris" Percent,"
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 12 0.1 %
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4445 � 24.9% 1877 10.5%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4412 24.8% 0 0%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 4342 24.3°/a
22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 3 0% 3295 18.5%
30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 2952 16.6% 0 0°/o
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 3576 20.1 % 5285 29.6%
35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 2436 13.7% 3044 17%
Total Arrivals 17824. ' 17855
_
04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 7 0% 175 1%
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 2731 15.6% 7623 43.3%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1579 9% 0 0%
17 Dep Bioomington/Eagan 5242 29.9°/o 2087 11.9%
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 22 0.1 % 396 2.2%
30� Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfieid 3475 19.8% 0 0%
30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 4497 25.6% 2378 13.5%
35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 4950 28.1 %
,:,,
Total Departures ` : 17553 ' '. ` ,176,09' " '
Totai Operations ' 35377 35464 .
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equai 100 % due to rounding.
\
_ 4_ Report Generated: 10/1012008 13:24
�. �
Carrier Jet Operations
Runway Use Report September 2008
. Last Year
Arrival/. . Count Co�ant Lasi Year
F2WY Depa�ture OverFlighi Area Operations f?ercent Operafions -`6'ercerit
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 10 0.1 %
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 3591 24.8% 1576 10.6%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 3612 25% 0 0%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 3576 24.1 %
22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 1 0% 2814 19%
30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 2348 16.2% 0 0%
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 2925 20.2% 4355 29.4%
35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 1996 13.8% 2500 16.9%
`Total Arrivals 14473 14831
_ ,
� -.
04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 7 0% 128 0.9%
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1997 14% 6416 43.6%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 1277 8.9% 0 Q%
17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 4514 31.6% 1778 12.1 %
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 17 0.1 % 327 2.2%
30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 2848 19.9% 0 0%
30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfieid 3640 25.5% 1990 13.5%
35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 4067 27.7%
_
Total Departuees ;::-,.. : 14300 . : 1470.6.. _;. , :
Total Operations 28773 29537 .
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equai 10D% due to rounding.
Report Generated: 10I10/2008 13:24 " 5"
September 2008 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition
... ,, .
FAR Part;36 Take= ; ,
Type Off Noise Level Aircraft Description Stage Count PeCcent '
8742 110 Boeing 747-200 3 20 0.1 %
6741 109.4 Boeing 747-100 3 2 0%
DC10 103 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 161 0.6%
B744 101,6 Boeing 747-400 3 64 0.2%
DC8Q 100.5 McDonnell Dougias DC8 Re-manufactured 3 36 0.1%
L101 99.3 Lockheed L-1011 3 2 0%
MD11 95.8 McDonnell Douglas MD11 3 30 0.1%
B767 95.7 Boeing 767 3 38 0.1 %
A330 95.6 Airbus industries A330 3 356 1.2%
B72Q 94.5 Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3 3 114 0.4%
6777 94.3 Boeing 777 3 2 0%
A300 94 Airbus Indusfries A300 3 109 0.4%
A310 92.9 Airbus IndustriesA310 3 36 0.1%
MD80 91.5 McDonnell Douglas MD80 3 876 3%
B757 91.4 Boeing 757 3 2525 $.8%
DC9Q 91 McDonneli Douglas DC9 Modified Stage 3 3 2373 8.2%
A321 89.8 Airbus industries A321 3 59 0.2%
B734 88.9 Boeing 737-400 3 14 0%
A320 87.8 Airbus Industries A320 3 4155 14.4%
6735 87.7 Boeing 737-500 3 339 1.2%
8738 87.7 Boeing 737-800 3 672 2.3%
A319 87.5 Airbus Industries A319 3 3791 13.2%
A318 87.5 Airbus Industries A318 3 2 0%
B733 87.5 Boeing 737-300 3 493 1.7%
87377 87.5 Boeing 737-700 3 350 1.2%
E145 83.7 Embraer 145 3 650 2,3%
E190 83.7 Embraer 190 3 117 0.4%
E170 83.7 Embraer 170 3 2279 7.9%
B717 83 Boeing 717 3 67 0.2%
CRJ 82.7 Canadair Regional Jet 3 8638 30%
E135 77.9 Embraer 135 3 403 1.4%
Totals 28773
Note: Sum of fleet mlx % may not equal tOD % due to rounding. �
Current Last Years
Count Percenf Percent .
Stage II 0 0% 0%
Stage III 2487 8.6% 14.2%
Stage III Manufactured 26286 91.4% 85.8%
Total Stage III - _ . 28773 ; _ '
�
Note: Stage I11 represent aircraft modified to meet all stage Iil criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation
(FAR) Part 36. This inciudes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. UPS
DC8Q are re-engined with manufactured stage 3 engines and are classified as Stage 111 Manufactured as of
January 1, 2008.
•The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during
take-off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Levei).
•EPN� is the level of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone-corrected perceived noise level /
of an aircraft flyover measured in A-weighted decibels. `. _
- 6- Report Generated: 10l10/2008 13:24
i I
Nighttime All Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
M ' •• • • I1.
Last Year
Arrivai! Count Count Last Year
RWY . Depariure C3ver�lighi l�rea ; Operations �ercenf Op�eraioons i'erce�#
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bioomington 0 0% 9 0.7%
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 223 18.1 % 547 42.9%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfieid 362 29.4% 0 0%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis 0 0% 22 1.7%
22 Arr St. Paul/Highland Park 0 0% 11 0.9%
30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 390 31.7% 0 0%
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 238 19.3% 462 36.3%
35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 17 1.4% 223 17.5%
Total �►rrivals ` 1230 1274 -
_,_ P , _ _ _
04 De St. Paul/Highland Park 0 0% 32 3.6%
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 232 34.7% 263 29.6%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 178 26.6% 0 0%
17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 25 3.7% 272 30.6%
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 2 0.2%
30L Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 79 11.8% 0. 0%
30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 154 23.1 % 268 30.1 %
35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 52 5.8%
Total Departures 6.68 889'
Total Operations 1898; ; . 2163 '
Note: Sum oi RUS % may not equai 100 % due to rounding.
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24 - � -
• - , - - ••-. • 1 /• ••11.
� . - �-�� -� - •- 11:
, : , �ast Year :
;:.
Arrival/ Count , ` Count , Last Year
RWY Depar#ure OverFlight Area, , Operations Percent Operations; Percenf
04 Arr So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 8 0.7%
12L Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 195 19.3% 477 42.3%
12R Arr So. Minneapolis/No. Richfield 321 31.8% 0 0%
17 Arr So. Minneapolis' 0 0% 20 1.8%
22 Arr St. Paul/Nighland Park 0 0% 9 0.8%
30L Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 295 29.3% 0 0%
30R Arr Eagan/Mendota Heights 196 19.4% 412 36.6%
35 Arr Bloomington/Eagan 1 0.1% 201 17.8%
�; . . . � ; T.ota1 Arrivais ,.. , ;: 1008 . . , " 1127
_ , < ,
04 Dep St. Paul/Highland Park 0 0% 29 3.7%
12L Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 191 37.2% 232 29J%
12R Dep Eagan/Mendota Heights 126 24.5% 0 0%
17 Dep Bloomington/Eagan 16 3.1 % 229 29.3%
22 Dep So. Richfield/Bloomington 0 0% 0 0%
30L Dep So. MinneapolislNo. Richfield 51 9.9% 0 0%
30R Dep So. Minneapolis/No. Richfieid 130 25.3% 247 31.6%
35 Dep So. Minneapolis 0 0% 45 5.8%
Total.D.epariures , ; ; , 514 , 782
, ,,
.
,:Total Operations. _ ; >`'` 1522:, ';' < �.1909
Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding.
_ g_ Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
450
400
350
H
G
m
�+ 300
�
,0 250
�
y"' 240
�
�I
� 150
100
50
October 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Operations
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
� o u� o in o �n o ici o�n o u� o ic-> o in o �n o icr o �n o in o irr o ira o in
M'ct GS .-� C�'� r1' O ci C7 d� O s-I t'"1 V O H C7 d� 4 ci M'c!" O ci M CY O a-1 M �1'
N N N N'N N O O O O O b O O O O O O 4 6 O O O O O O O O O O
.� � �1 i�!'L."-i
October 2008 Nighttime Scheduled Operations
1 U:3U p.m. to b:uu a.m.
ii�anufac�ured
Airline Stage 2 Stage3 Stage 3 Total
Northwest (NWA) 0 31 575 606
UPS (UPS) 0 0 203 203
Continental (COA) 0 0 76 76
FedEx (FDX) 0 0 76 76
US Airways (USA) 0 0 5$ 58
American (AAL) 0 0 58 58
Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 57 57
Midwest Airlines (MEP) 0 0 54 54
United (UAL) 0 0 50 50
Kitty Hawk (KHA) 0 8 38 46
BAX (78W) 0 46 0 46
Delta (DAL) 0 0 45 45
Frontier Airlines (FFT) 0 0 31 31
Airtran (TRS) 0 0 7 7
Total 0 85 1328 . 1413
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
�tW41R' ;
p
� UPS : ;
r'I�GOA'; �
� FDX"
❑USA )
� ARL i �
�SCX` �
❑ MEP : ;
�URL: '1
a�KHR �
" �?BW.. q
❑DAL �
❑FFT�, �
�:;I�TRS': �
�
• ��- 11: � - -• -• �•• . �
Flight : Days of
Time.
A/D :; Carrier > Number . Equipment Stage Operation Routing ,'`
22:30 A BAX 705 B72Q H MTWThF YYC MSP TOL
22:30 A Sun Country 284 8738 M TWThSu SEA MSP
22:30 D Northwest 120 A320 M S MSP MKE
22:30 D Northwest 120 A320 M MTWThFSu PHX MSP MKE
22:30 D Northwest 1896 E175 M MTWThFSSu SLC MSP GRB
22:30 D Northwest 3466 CRJ M MTWThFSu MSP BIS
22:30 D Northwest 3602 CRJ M MTWThFSu MSP LSE
22:31 D Northwest 562 A320 M MTWThFSu DEN MSP DLH
22:32 A Frontier Airlines 109 A319 M MTWThFSSu DEN MSP
22:33 A Continental 2877 E145 M MTWThFSu EWR MSP
22:33 A Delta 6461 CRJ M MTWThFSSu JFK MSP
22:35 D FedEx 1021 A300 M WThFS
22:35 D No�thwest 3094 SF34 M MTWThFSSu MSP CWA
22:35 D Northwest 3286 CRJ M S MSP ATW
22:35 D Northwest 3286 CRJ M MTWThFSu STL MSP ATW
22:35 D Northwest 4772 CRJ M MTWThFSSu MSP DSM
22:36 A Airtran 869 8737 M MTWThFSSu ATL MSP
22:38 A Northwest 519 A320 M MTWThFSu LGA MSP
22:45 D Northwest 145 DC9Q H S MSP FSD
22:45 D Northwest 145 DC9Q H MTWThFSu ORD MSP FSD
22:55 A Sun Country 704 8738 M WF PHX MSP
22:55 A Sun Couniry 708 B738 M MT PHX MSP
22:56 A Northwest 310 A319 M MTWThFSu �AX MSP
23:00 A United 463 B733 M MTWThF BUF ORD MSP
23:03 A United 726 8735 M MTWThF DEN MSP
23:07 A Delta 1134 8737 M TWFS ATL MSP
23:07 A Delta 1134 MD80 M MThSu ATL MSP
23:11 A Northwest 767 8757 M MTWThFSSu DTW MSP
23:15 A Midwest Airlines 2775 CRJ M MTWThFSu CLE MKE MSP
23:20 A Sun Country 106 8738 M MTThSu LAS MSP
23:25 A United 463 8733 M Su BUF ORD MSP
23:30 A American 2049 6738 M MTWThFSSu MIA MSP
23:30 D BAX 705 B72Q H MTWThF YYC MSP TOL
23:40 A American 363 MD80 M MTWThFSu LGA ORD MSP
23:42 A US Airways 940 A321 M MTWThFSu SAN PHX MSP
23:44 A Continental 2816 E145 M Su IAH MSP
23:44 A US Airways 1074 A319 M MTWThFSSu CLT MSP
23:49 A Continental 2816 E145 M MTWThF IAH MSP
23:55 A Sun Country 404 6738 M MWThS SAN MSP
00:03 A UPS 552 8757 M TWThF
00:04 A UPS 556 A300 M TWThF
00:04 A UPS 558 DC8Q M TWThF
00:05 A UPS 496 8757 M S
00:05 A UPS 560 8767 M� TWThF
00:06 D UPS 496 B757 M S
00:07 D UPS 2557 B767 M TWTh
00:15 A Kitty Hawk 772 B733 M TWThF DEN MCI MSP FWA
00:17 A UPS 2558 B767 M MTWTh
00:20 A UPS 495 6757 M S
00:21 D UPS 551 8757 M TWThF
- 10 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
• �•- 11: • - -• •• ••- . •
Flight Days of
Time A/D Carrier - Number Equipment' Sfage Operation Routing '
00:21 D UPS 557 DC8Q M TWThF
00:21 D UPS 559 8767 M TWThFS
00:22 D UPS 555 A300 M TWThF
00:23 D UPS 495 8757 M 5
00:30 A Kitty Hawk 1850 B72Q H S PDX SEA MSP FWA
00:45 D Kitty Hawk 772 B733 M TWThF DEN MCI MSP FWA
01:15 D Kiffy Hawk 1850 B72Q H S PDX SEA MSP FWA
03:30 D FedEx 1407 MD11 M MThFSSu
04:00 D FedEx 1718 MD11 M ThFSSu
04:40 D FedEx 2718 MD11 M M
04:45 D FedEx 1744 A310 M ThFSSu
05:25 D Delta 1073 6737 M WThSSu MSP ATL
05:25 D Delta 1073 MD80 M MTF MSP ATL
05:42 A Northwest 844 8757 M Su ANC MSP
05:42 A Northwest 844 8757 M MTWThFS ANC MSP BOS
05;44 A Northwest 362 A320 M MTWThFS SFO MSP LGA
05:44 A Northwest 362 8757 M Su SFO MSP LGA
05:46 D Continental 2017 E145 M MTWThF MSP IAH
05:47 A Northwest 774 8757 M MTWThFSSu LAS MSP
05:50 A Northwest 154 8753 M MTWThFSSu SEA MSP
05:50 A Northwesf 314 B753 M MTWThFSSu �AX MSP
05:53 A Northwest $08 A333 M MTWThFSSu HNL MSP
05:55 D FedEx 2405 A300 M Su
05:55 D Midwest Airlines 2810 CRJ M MTWThFS MSP MKE CMH
05:58 A No�thwest 3324 CRJ M MTWThFS CID MSP
05:59 A Northwest 3337 CRJ M MTWThFS RST MSP
05:59 A Northwest 3486 CRJ M MTWThFS LSE MSP MCI
Report Generated: 10(10/2008 13:24 ' � � "
September 2008 Top 15 Actual Nighttime Jet Operators by Type
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
Total Nighttime Jet
Operations by Hour
Hour ;.. .Count::
2230 524
2300 279
2400 41
100 25
200 6
300 16
400 67
500 564
TOT/�L 1522
Airline, ` ID �:'.
American AAL
American AA�
American AAL
America West AWE
America West AWE
America West AWE
Continental Exp. BTA
Compass CPZ
Delta DAL
Delta DAL
DHL DHL
FedEx FDX
FedEx FDX
FedEx FDX
FedEx � FDX
Pinnacle FLG
Mesaba MES
Northwest NWA
Northwest NWA
Narthwest NWA
Northwest NWA
Northwest NWA
Northwest NWA
Sun Country SCX
Sun Country SCX
Skywest Afrlines SKW
United UAL
United UAL
United UAL
UPS UPS
UPS UPS
UPS UPS
UPS UPS
UPS UPS
US Airways USA
US Airways USA
US Airways USA
US Airways USA
` TOT .A.L
Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 95.8°/a of the total nighttime carrier jet operations.
_ � 2_ Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
September 2008 Nighttime Operations Mix for Top 15 Airlines
10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m.
350
300
us
� 250
:N
�
e!J
CY. 200
{:7
.�.
C7
�.
i11 150
:Ei
�
�
�
100
�f�7
� O IP O ICJ O 117 O ILJ L7 117 O It7 O IL7 6 IL7 O ICJ O If7 O!Cl O It7 O 11'J 6 lC7 O lC7
( J �ct O ci C'7 �f- O cl C7 V O r7 [�7 V O rl P") d' Gf ci C7 'd' O s-1 C7 V' O a-1 M ct
N N M M M C+1 O b O: O a-1 s-i ri c-1 N N N N[`'J C7 M M<1' r!" d" '¢1' IP' !C7' ICY It7
N N N N N N O O O O O d�C7 O O O O O O O O O O O 6 O O O d O
�
September 2008 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines
'iu:;�u p.m. to u:vu a.m.
I�ianufacfured ,
Airline Stage Z Stage3 Stage 3`. Total
Northwest (NWA) 0 85 388 473
Mesaba (MES) 0 0 246 246
Pinnacle (FLG) 0 0 97 97
Sun Country (SCX) 0 0 87 87
Compass (CPZ) 0 0 83 83
UPS (UPS) 0 0 72 72
FedEx (FDX) 0 0 62 62
Delta (DAL) 0 0 59 59
American (AAL) 0 0 57 57
Continental Exp. (BTA) 0 0 50 50
DHL (DHL) 0 50 0 50
US Airways (USA) 0 0 35 35
Skywest Airlines (SKW) 0 0 33 33
America West (AWE) 0 0 28 28
United (UAL) 0 0 26 26
Other 0 23 41 64
` `Total 0 158 1364 1522
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
-13-
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
r � � ��� r � �� � �� „•
Sep 1 thru 8, 2008 — 3890 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Sep 1 thru 8, 2008 — 3864 Carrier Jet Departures
Sep 1 thru 8, 2008 — 250 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals Sep 1 thru 8, 2008 — 122 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures `
�..
- 14 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — September 2008
Sep 9 thru 16, 2008 — 3832 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Sep 9 thru 16, 2008 — 3806 Carrier Jet Departures
Sep 9 thru 16, 2008 — 272 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Sep 9 thru 16, 2008 — 145 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 10/10i2008 13:24
�
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flighfi Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — September 2008
Sep 17 thru 24, 2008 — 3893 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Sep 17 thru 24, 2008 — 3807 Carrier Jet Departures
Sep 17 #hru 24, 2008 — 278 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
�;
Sep 17 ihru 24, 2008 — 134 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures �,, /
- 16 - Repo�t Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
f' �
Airport Noise and C�perations Monitoring System Flight Tracks
Carrier Jet Operations — September 2008
Sep 25 thru 30, 2008 — 2858 Carrier Jet Arrivals
Sep 25 thru 30, 2008 — 2823 Carrier Jet Departures
Sep 25 thru 30, 2008 — 208 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals
Sep 25 thru 30, 2008 — 113 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
-17-
MSP International Airport
Remote Monitoring Tower (RMT) Site �ocations
1,��� •
'�'j� h'�` Remote Monitoring Tower
a�,��'���:
� . ���,::
v� �,,.
�.
_� g_ Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Time Above dB Threshold for Arrival Related Noise Events
September 2008
RMT Time >= Time >= Time >= Time >_
JD , City Address 65dB 80dB 90dB. . 100dB. .
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st Sf. 18:44:41 00:01:52 00:00:00 00:00:00
2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd 5t. 21:14:17 00:11:18 00:00:00 00:00:00
3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 22:12:47 00:53:13 00:00:56 00:00:01
4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 20:16:52 00:17:31 00:00:06 00:00:00
5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 22:41:12 04:32:26 00:02:55 00:00:00
6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 22:34:52 04:08:47 00:05:15 00:00:03
7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 00:26:27 00:01:03 00:00:00 00:00:00
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 00:07:25 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & HartFord Ave. 00:01:15 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00
10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:01:12 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00
11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:00:54 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
12 ' St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:00:45 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
13 Mendota Heights 5outheast end of Mohican Court 00:07:11 00:00:03 00:00:00 00:00:00
14 Eagan 1sf St. & McKee St. 19:36:43 00:01:02 00:00:00 00:00:00
15 Mendoia Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 00:32:00 00:00:12 00:00:00 00:00:00
16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 15:06:18 00:46:47 00:00:15 00:00:01
17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:00:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 00:33:48 00:00:24 00:00:00 00:00:00
19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 00:19:39 00:00:07 00:00:00 00:00;00
20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:00:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:11:06 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00
22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Traii 10:17:40 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00
23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 01:38:15 00:00:49 00:00:00 00:00:00
24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 19:01:43 00:01:42 00:00:00 00:00:00
25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 00:26:38 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 00:54:51 00:00:04 00:00:00 00:00:00
27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 00:09:52 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00
28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 00:58:57 00:00:55 00:00:00 00:00:00
29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 00:01:20 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
30 Bioomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 03:56:35 00:00:42 00:00:00 00:00:00
31 Bloomingion 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:00:28 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:00:23 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
33 Burnsviile North River Hilis Park 00:00:49 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:06:29 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 06:57:24 00:00:18 00:00:00 00:00:00
36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 10:49:13 00:00:35 00:00:00 00:00:00
37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:00:44 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 00:00:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
' ', Tota1 T�me for Arrival Noise Evenfs , ' 220:12:39 11:00:17 0,0;09:27 00:00:05:;
Report Generated: 10J10/2008 13:24 - 19 -
� � • • � � � • • i • � � • . " � � . � • • � �
'� � •' ��i
RMT Time >_' Time >= Time >= Time >_.
ID City . Address. ,. 65d6. 'SOdB 90dB 100dB`.;
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 03:51:45 00:01:18 00:00:00 00:00:00
2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St 04:46:51 00:02:37 00:00:00 00;00:00
3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 08:48:56 00:09:12 00:00:47 00:00:00
4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 11:07:36 00:11:11 00:00:11 00:00:00
5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 30:37:14 02:35:39 00:21:31 00:00:00
6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 38;27:47 05:38:05 00:37:55 00:00:23
7 Richfieid Wenfworth Ave. & 64th St. 15:34:50 00:35:57 00:00:18 00:00:00
$ Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 11:26:41 00:20:14 00:00:10 00:00:00
9 St. Paul Saratoga Sf. & HartFord Ave. 00:07:11 00:00:42 00:00:13 00:00:00
10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin Sf. 00:05:23 00:01:31 00:00:46 00:00:02
11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:07:23 00:01:14 00:00:17 00:00:00
12 St. Paul Aiton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:03:29 00:00:00 A0:00:00 00:00:00
13 Mendota Heights Soufheast end of Mohican Court 07:48:30 00:01:42 00:00:00 00:00:00
14 Eagan 1 st St. & McKee St. 08:33:15 00:24:24 00:00:29 00:00:00
15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & �exington Ave. 11:45:51 00:09:48 00:00:08 00:00:00
16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 08:47:52 00:41:01 00:03:20 00:00:00
17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:29:47 00:03:36 00:00:42 00:00:00
18 Richfieid 75th St. & 17th Ave. 13:48:24 00:13:42 00;02:13 00:00:00
19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 07:15:10 00:03:18 00:00:00 00:00:00
20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 00:33:22 00:01:35 00:00:14 00:00:00
21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 03:19:10 00:00:59 00:00:00 00:00:00
22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 01:58:09 00:00:20 00:00:00 00:00:00
23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 17:13:53 00:49:25 00:04:06 00:00:00
24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 05:21:09 00:07:23 00:00:00 00:00:00
25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 07:14:14 00:00:18 00:00:00 00:00:00
26 Inver Grova Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 04:34:51 00:02:58 00:00:03 00:00:00
27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 08:07:15 00:07:50 00:00:01 00:00:00
28 Richfieid 6645 16fh Ave. S. 20:20:42 00:14:44 00:00:03 00:00:00
29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. Schoo14315 31 st Ave. S. 06:46:34 00:03:38 00:00:00 00:00:00
30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 23:34:41 01:21:55 00:03:44 00:00:00
31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 02:16:13 00:00:54 00:00:05 00:00:00
32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:50:53 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00
33 Burnsville North River Hilis Park 01:38:04 00:00:26 00:00:00 00:00:00
34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:31:55 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00
35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 03:31:27 00:03:02 00:00:00 00:00:00
36 Appie Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 01:21:43 00:00:47 00:00:00 00:00:00
37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate �n. N. 02:19:43 00:01:45 00:00:06 00:00:05
38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 04:14:52 00:01:55 00:00:00 00:00:00
39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 06:58:43 00:05:24 00:00:00 00:00:00
' Total Time for Departure`Noise Events. ', '� 306:21:31. 14,:20:30 . 01:17:22 , 00 00:30'°
C..
- 20 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Arrival Related Noise Events
-. - .- ��:
" ' Arrival ArriSal.. Arrival Arrival
RMT Events >= Events >= Events>= . Events >_
ID City Address . 65dB 80dB 90dB i100dB ,;
, , _
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 4629 23 0 0
2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 4441 207 0 0
3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 4436 762 11 1
4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 4410 309 1 0
5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 4564 3162 55 0
6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 4553 3795 176 1
7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th Sf. 98 8 0 0
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 28 0 0 0
9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 5 1 0 0
10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 4 2 0 0
11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 3 0 0 0
12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 3 0 0 0
13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 30 1 0 0
14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 4455 15 0 0
15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 128 4 0 0
16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 2998 562 3 1
17 Bioomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 2 0 0 0
18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 138 13 0. 0
19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 70 3 0 0
20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 3 0 0 0
21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 43 1 0 0
' � 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 2420 2 0 0
23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 436 8 0 0
24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 4201 42 0 0
25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 95 0 0 0
26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 240 2 0 0
27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 44 1 0 0
28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 212 16 0 0
29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 5 0 0 0
30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 1096 9 0 0
31 Bloomington 9501 12ih Ave. S. 2 0 0 0
32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasent Ave. 5. 2 0 0 0
33 Burnsville North River Hilis Park 5 0 0 0
34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 24 0 0 0
35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 1722 9 0 0
36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 2125 7 0 0
37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate �n. N. 3 0 0 0
38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 0 0 0 0
39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 3 0 0 0
Total Arrivai Noise Events - ,<47676: 8.964 ; 246 3... :: ,..
; �
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24 - 21 '
I���r � �� � �, � � �
�� � �� „•
DeparEure. Departure Departure, DeparEure i
RMT ` ; Events >= Events >= Events >= Events;>=
ID. City Address 65dB 80dB .. 90dB :. 100dB .''
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 762 13 0 0
2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 901 41 1 0
3 Minneapolis Wesf Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 1613 78 8 0
4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th 5t. 1986 118 4 0
5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th Sf. 4902 972 2'19 0
6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 6195 2310 316 10
7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St 2473 291 5 0
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 1916 168 5 0
9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 20 5 2 0
10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St, 13 6 6 1
11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 17 6 3 0
12 St. Paui Alton St. & Rockwoad Ave. 14 0 0 0
13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 1585 25 0 0
14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 1456 185 6 0
15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 2077 109 2 0
16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 1384 244 43 0
17 Bloomingfon 84th St. & 4ih Ave. 85 18 7 0
18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 2915 178 17 0
19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 1425 41 0 0
20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 97 9 2 0
21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 711 14 0 0
22 inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 354 10 0 0 �
23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 2779 373 52 0
24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 902 92 0 0
25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 921 5 0 0
26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 907 31 1 0
27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 irving Ave. S. 1549 92 1 0
28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 3533 219 1 0
29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. Schooi 4315 31st Ave. S. 1227 49 0 0
30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 3715 481 54 0
31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 487 9 1 0
32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 180 1 0 0
33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 345 7 0 0
34 Surnsville Red Oak Park 119 0 0 0
35 Eagan 2100 Garnef Ln. 642 33 0 0
36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 238 12 0 0
37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 404 36 0 0
38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 753 35 0 0
39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 1309 62 0 0
` Total De,parture Noise Events '; ;:; 529,11
6378 .. _ 756 . ��
C
- 22 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Top Ten Loudest Aircrafit Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
(RMT Site#1)
Xerxes Ave. & 41st St., Minneapolis
Date/Time Flight Number. , Aircraft Type Arrival/ `- <Runway Lmax(dB)
_: , ,
Departure
09/11/2008 7:28 NWA739 B757 A 12R 88.6
09/17/200813:54 NWA218 8757 A 12R 86.7
09/11/2008 5:50 DH�597 B72Q A 12R 86.5
09l2112008 7:13 NWA739 8757 A 12R 86.4
09/22/200810;29 NWA777 B757 A 12R 86
09/30/200815:15 NWA19 B744 D 30L 85.5
09/24/200815:59 NWA19 8744 D 22 85.4
09/29J200$ 15:15 NWA19 B744 D 30L 84.7
09/27/200815:31 NWA3 6744 D 30L 84.6
09l07/200815:09 NWA19 8744 D 30L 84.4
(RMT Site#2)
Fremont Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis
DatelTime Flight Number 'Aircraft Type - ArrivaU ,:. :- Runway . Lmax(dB)
, __; , .. _
Departure';
09/05/200815:21 NWA444 B757 D 30L 90.5
09/23J200819:18 NWA757 B757 A 12L 88.6
09/04/200814:07 NWA186 A320 A 12R 86.7
09/25/2008 5:51 NWA1470 DC9Q A 12L 85.9
09J04(2008 7:26 NWA1493 DC9Q A 12L 85.5
09113/2008 8:13 NWA133 A320 A 12L 85.3
09/10/2008 8:35 CPZ2066 E170 A 12R 85.3
09/18/200819:52 NWA1495 DC9Q A 12L 85.2
09/08/200814:48 NWA369 A319 D 30R 85.1
09/04/200811:59 NWA20 6744 A 12R 85.1
Date/Time
09/18/2008 13:57
09/11/2008 7:29
09/20/2008 11:57
09/23/2008 13:45
09/21/2008 20:16
09/21/2008 7:14
09/17/2008 13:55
09/23/2008 4:16
09(30/2008 15:15
09/14/2008 13:20
(RMT Site#3)
West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave., Minnea
Flight Number Aircr.aft Type Arrival/ '
Departure
NWA218 6757 A
NWA739 8757 A
NWA302 8757 A
N WA784 6757 A
NWA9987 6757 A
NWA739 8757 A
NWA218 8757 A
DHL704 B72Q A
NWA19 6744 D
NWA1068 DC9Q D
Report Generated: 1 0/1 0/2008 13:24
r�
�
Lmax(dBj
100.2
99.6
... 98 ---
. ..5
97.8
96.6
95.7 _
95.7
95.5 _
94.6 .
94.3
-23-
Top Ten Loudesfi Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
,.
(RMT Site#4) ',
Park Ave. & 48th St., Minneapolis
DaielTime Fl�ght Nui»ber 'Aircraft Type Arrival/;', ' Ru'nway �` �max(dB)
Depa�ture
09/23/200819:19 NWA757 8757 A 12L 97.2
09/14/2008 7:02 NWA744 DC9Q D 30L 93.7
09/03/2008 22:39 DHL197 B72Q D 30L 90.8
09/11/200815:32 NWA1492 DC9Q D 30L 90.3
09/30/200813:23 NWA1068 DC9Q D 30L 90.1
09/27/200812:42 RRR3623 L101 D 30� 90
09/27/2008 21:34 NWA1148 DC9Q D 30R 89.7
09/03/200815:08 NWA19 B744 D 30L 89.5
09/23/2008 5:43 DHL597 B72Q A 12L 89.4
09l27/2008 7:02 NWA744 DC9Q D 30L 88.3
(RMT Site#5)
12th Ave. & 58th St., Minneapolis
DatelTime ` Fligi�ifi Numtier `'Aircraft Type .` Arrival/ . < Runway ; Lmax(dB)
Departure
09I15/200816:48 NWA458 DC9Q D 30L 99.5
09130/200815:14 NWA19 B744 D 30L 98.3
09/02/200$ 10:25 NWA454 DC9Q D 30L 98.3
09/23/2008 4:16 DN�704 B72Q A 12R 98.2 j'
09/0512008 11:39 NWA452 DC9Q D 30L 98.1 �� .
09/08/200810:28 NWA454 DC9Q D 30L 97.9
09/11/2008 6:15 ADB2298 Unknown A 12R 97.7
09/15(200810:16 NWA498 DC9Q D 30� 97.7
09/12/200811:25 NWA1527 DC9Q D 30L 97.6
09/13I200816:48 NWA458 DC9Q D 30L 97.4
(RMT Site#6)
25th Ave. & 57th St., Minneapolis
Date/Time Fligh,t Number A�rcraft;Type " ArrivaU:: ;! , Runway ,. ; Lmax(dB) "
Departure
09/03/200813:10 NWA1068 DC9Q D 30R 103.2
09/23/200819:19 NWA757 8757 A 12L 102.7
09/30/20081:44 CG13711 672Q D 30R 102.5
09/15/200817:23 NWA758 DC9Q D 30R 101.3
09/07/200813:33 NWA1258 DC9Q D 30R 101.2
09/29/200814:37 NWA1471 DC9Q D 30R 100.9
09/05/200810:25 NWA7$9 DC9Q D 30R 100J
09/15/200813;30 NWA1258 DC9Q D 30R 100.6
09/27/200815:22 NWA793 DC9Q D 30R 100.6
09/30/200814:56 NWA865 DC9Q D 30R 100.5
- 24 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
(RMT Site#7)
Wentworth Ave. & 64th St., Richfield
- ,
Date/Time . Flight Number , Airc�aft Type Arr�val! ' Runway' Lmax(c1B)
• Departure
09I03/2008 7:04 NWA138 DC9Q D 30L 92.2
09/11/200816:54 NWA458 DC9Q D 30L 92.2
09/14/200812:40 DAL1621 MD80 D 30� 91.3
09/30/2008 23:10 CCI1705 B72Q D 30L 91.3
09/13/200815:20 NWA1459 DC9Q D 30� 90.5
09/07/200813:27 AAL1227 MD80 D 30� $9.9
09/24/200812:39 DAL1621 MD80 D 30L 89.9
09/08/200811:04 AAL1180 MD80 D 30L 89.8
09/03/200810:32 NWA454 DC9Q D 301. 89.7
09/13/200819:33 NWA1535 DC9Q D 30L 89.3
(RMT Site#8)
Lonafellow Ave. & 43rd St., Minneapolis
Date/Time Flight Number ; Aircraff.Type ,. Arrival/ �' >. Runway ` Lmaz(dB) :
_ . ,, ,; ,
_ < Departure _, , .
09/07/200814:47 NWA865 DC9Q D 30R 91.9
09/05/200817:40 NWA758 DC9Q D 30R 91
09/05l200815:31 NWA793 DC9Q D 30R 90.8
09/29/2008 22:42 DHL197 B72Q D 30L 90.7
09/11/200815:50 NWA793 DC9Q D 30R 90.6
09/02/2008 23:06 CC1705 B72Q D 30L 89.4
Q9/11/2008 22:37 DHL197 B72Q D 30L 89.1
09/30/20081:45 CC13711 B72Q D 30R 89
09/02/2008 22:37 DH�197 672Q D 30L 88.7
09/30/2008 22:36 DHL197 672Q Q 30L 88.2
Date/Time
09/28/2008 15:16
09/12/2008 15:27
09/27/2008 13:42
09/23/2008 16:32
09/17/2008 15:52
09/20/2008 15:42
09/20/2008 15:17
09/23/2008 16:26
09/19/2008 6:37
09/23/2008 16:38
NWA19
NWA19
NWA1258
MES2776
NWA19
NWA3
NWA19
N WA689
BMJ62
ME$2754
Report Generated: 10(10J2008 13:24
(t��v� � site�y)
oga St. & Hartford Ave., St. Paul
Aircraff Type Arrival/
Departure
8744 D
8744 D
DC9Q D
S F34 A
B744 D
6744 D
8744 D
A320 A
BE80 D
SF34 A
Runway
04
04
04
22
04
04
04
22
12R
22
nax(dB)
93.2
90.9
85.8
81.4
81
80.3
79.4
79
76.9
76.7
�
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
(RMT Site#10)
Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St., St. Paul
Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft.Type ' './Arrival/. Runway Lmax(dB) "
beparture
09/17/200815:52 NWA19 8744 D 04 100
09/12/200815:27 NWA19 8744 D 04 97.9
09/20/200815:42 NWA3 8744 D 04 97.1
09/20/200815:17 NWA19 6744 D 04 96.9
Q9/28/200$ 15:16 NWA19 B744 D 04 96.8
09/271200813:42 NWA1258 DC9Q D 04 92.6
09/23/200816:33 MES2776 SF34 A 22 84.5
09/23/200816:26 NWA689 A320 A 22 82.9
09/23/200816:38 MES2754 SF34 • A 22 79.8
09/26/200817:25 NWA184 A320 A 12L 75.8
(RMT Site#11)
Finn St. & Scheffer Ave., St. Paul
Date/Time FlightNuKnber. AircraffType„ Arr�vaU
Departure '
09/20/200815;17 NWA19 B744 D�
09/27/2Q0815:12 NWA19 6744 D
09/17/200815:52 NWA19 6744 D
09/20/200815:42 NWA3 6744 D
09/12/200815:27 NWA19 B744 D
09/28/200815:16 NWA19 B744 D
09/03/2008 7:20 BMJ48 BE80 D
09/26/200817:25 NWA184 A320 A
09/23/200816:33 MES2776 SF34 A
09/12/2008 7:13 BMJ48 BE80 D
(RMT Site#12)
Alton St. & Rockwood Ave., St. Paui
, Lmax(dB) '
96.1
94.8
90.4
88.2
83.8
80.8
79.1
76.1
75.3
74.6
9 _ _. .
Date/Time Fli ht Number Aircraft Type A�rival/• Runway �max(dB) '
D,epartu're
09/23/200817:57 NWA573 A319 D 12L 76.2
09/19/2008 6:37 BMJ62 BE80 D 12R 76.1
09/23/200819:01 NWA198 A320 D 12� 75.9
09l23/200817:48 NWA1207 A319 D 12L 74.4
09/18/2008 21:46 ME53034 SF34 D 12L 70.9
09/23/200818:18 NWA746 A320 D 17 70.�
09/20/200814:18 AWE9094 A321 A 12R 70.5
09/23J200818:59 FLG2835 CRJ D 12L 70.5
09/17/200817:08 MES3007 SF34 b 12L 70.3
09/06/200818:45 NWA884 A319 D 30L 69.9
C
- 26 - Report Generated; 10/10l2008 13:24
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
(RMT Site#13)
Southeast end of Mohican Court, Mendota Heights
DatelTime Flight Number Aircraft.Type Arrivall : ° Runway :. Lmax(dB) `
. Departure .
09/15/2008 22:42 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 86:5
09/26/2008 23:36 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 86.5
09/19/2008 7:10 AAL1718 MD80 D 12L 85.3
09/03/200812:58 NW;4687 A319 A 30R 82.9
09/24/2008 21:22 NWA1148 DC9Q D 12L 82.7
q9/15/2008 21:35 NWA1148 DC9Q D 12L 82.3
09/01/2008 6:25 AAL1698 MD80 D 12R 82.1
09/02/200$ 5:41 DAL1113 MD80 D 12R 82.1
09/06/2008 22:10 NWA1148 DC9Q D 12L 82
09/10/2008 20:11 NWA1741 DC9Q D 12L 82
(RMT Site#14)
1 st St. & McKee St., Eaqan
-Date/Time Fligiit,Number Aircraft:Type ,, Arrivalf;-., ` Runway ; Lmax(dB),
Departure : ,
09/01/200810:37 KFS720 B72Q D 12R 98
09l12/20081:24 CC11739 B72Q D 12R 93.3
09/17/200812:14 NWA1150 DC9Q D 12R 90.7
09/21/2008 7:00 NWA744 DC9Q D 12R 90.1
09/15/2008 23:53 NWA9800 B742 D 12R 90.1
09/19/20081:27 NWA9802 6742 D 12R 90
09/12/2008 22:49 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 89.9
09/23/2008 22:51 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 89.8
09/21/2008 7:48 DAL798 MD80 D 12R 89.8
09/13/2008 7:05 NWA744 DC9Q D 12R 89.6
(tliVl I 51te�� �)
Cullon St. & Lexington Ave., Mendota Heights
Date/T.ime Flight Number Ai�craft Type Arrival/ Runw
Departure
09l28/2008 20:18 NWA1741 DC9Q � 12L
09/23/2008 20:31 NWA796 DC9Q D 12L
09/15/2008 22:27 NWA1469 DC9Q D 12�
09l21/2008 22:20 NWA871 DC9Q D 12L
09/17/200814:22 NWA1471 DC9Q D 12�
09(18/2008 20:23 NWA796 DC9Q D 12L
09/23/200815:04 NWA1471 DC9Q D 12L
09(25/2008 20:36 NWA1741 DC9Q D 12L
09126/200818:54 NWA606 DC9Q D 12L
09/11/200811:13 NWA498 DC9Q D 12L
Report Generated; 10/10/2008 13:24
✓ ' I L
- 27 -
Top Ten Loudesfi Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
Date/Time , Flight Num�
09/14/20q8 5:39 NWA154
09/12/200816:11 NWA1492
09/17/200812:14 NWA1150
09/17/200814:17 NWA9801
09/26/200813:24 NWA1068
09/12/200816:55 NWA45$
09/18/200813:22 NWA1068
09/04/200815:09 NWA19
09/12l20081:23 CC11739
09/28/200810:29 NWA454
Date/Time _
09/14/2008 15:32
09/13/2008 15:24
09/10/2008 15:11
09/18/2008 15:27
09/09/2008 15:51
09/13/2008 15:39
09/15/2008 15:14
09/24/2008 15:58
09/23/2008 15:30
09/16/2008 15:53
(RMT Site#16)
Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane,.
�r A�rcraft 7ype . Arr�v<
� . DeparE
0
0
Q
0
❑�
C
C
C
C
an
Runway Lmax(dB)
..__..._ ,
30L 100.2
12R 96.2 -
12R 95.9
12R 94.9
12R 94.6
12R 93.8
12R 93.7
12R 93.7
1•2R 93.7
12R 93.3
(RMT Site#17)
84th St. & 4th Ave., Bloomington
light Number. Aircraft Type `.. Arrival/.' ..
Departure �
NWA19 6744 D
NWA19 8744 D
NWA19 B744 D
NWA19 8744 D
NWA19 B744 D
NWA3 B744 D
NWA19 6744 D
NWA19 6744 D
NWA19 6744 D
NWA19 B744 D
(RMT Site#18)
75th St. & 17th Ave., Richfield
22.
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
Lmax(dB) ;
- 99.1
95.4
94.1
92.8
92.4
90.3
90.1
87.9
86.9
86.8
"Date/Time , Flight Number Aircraft.Type Arrival/ Runway .:`` Lmax(dB) ".
Departure
09/09/200815:50 NWA19 B744 D 22 99.5
09/10/200815:11 NWA19 B744 D 22 99.2
09/19/200815:15 NWA19 8744 D 22 98.7
09/11/200815:18 NWA19 B744 D 22 98.3
09/06/200817:05 NWA19 6744 D 22 9$.2
09/18/200815:26 NWA19 B744 D 22 97.9
09/23/2008 15:29 NWA19 B744 D 22 • 97.6
09/16/2008 15:52 NWA19 8744 D � 22 97.3
09l24/200815:58 NWA19 6744 D 22 97.3
09/05/200815:13 NWA19 8744 D 22 97.2
- 28 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
DatelTime
09/23/2008 19:02
09/14/2008 15:32
09/19/2008 15:16
09/23/2008 19:30
09/23/200$ 19:41
09/16/2008 15:53
09/13/2008 15:39
09/23/2008 15:30
09(09/2008 15:50
09/23/2008 19:24
(RMT Site#19)
16th Ave. & 84th St., Bloomingt
Fiight'Number Aircraft Type Arrivai/,, ,
Deparfure .
, , ...
NWA146 DC9Q D
NWA19 8744 D
NWA19 8744 D
NWA1432 DC9Q D
AAL1358 MD80 D
NWA19 8744 D
NWA3 B744 D
NWA19 B744 D
NWR19 B744 D
UAL1208 6733 D
(RMT Site#20)
75th St. & 3rd Ave., Richfield
n
Runway �max(dB)
17 88.8
22 88.4
22 87.5
17 87.1
17 86.5
22 85
22 84.8
22 84.2
22 84.2
17 83.8
`Date/Time � Flight,Numlier. Aircraft Type - 'Arrival/ ' Runway Lmax(dB),
_ . _:. . . . . . ,
Departure
09/05/200815:13 NWA19 B744 D 22 94•7
09/06/200817:05 NWA19 8744 D 22 94
09/02/200815:15 NWA19 8744 D 22 89.5
09/11/200815:19 NWA19 B744 D 22 86.7
09/15/200811:33 NWA128 DC9Q D 30L 84.3
09/05/2008 6:59 FDX645 DC10 D 30L 84.2
09/06/200815:48 NWA3 8744 D 22 81
09/24/200815:58 NWA19 8744 D 22 80.9
09/05/2008 21:57 FDX1207 MD11 D 30L 80.4
09/24/2008 6:58 FDX645 DC10 D 30L 79.9
(t�IVI I JIte�L'I )
Barbara Ave. & 67th St.. Inver Grove Heiqhts
-
`Date/Time ` Flight Number AircrafE Type Arrivall ,' ' Runway- Lmax(dB) ,
Departure. _
,
09/19(20081:28 NWA9802 8742 D 12R 85.5
09/23/2008 23:22 CCI705 B72Q D 12R 83.2
09/22/200815:34 NWA19 8744 D 12R 82.5
09/04/200815:10 NWA19 B744 D 12R 81.9
09/20/2008 8:55 NWA1429 DC9Q D 12L 81.9
09/15/2008 22:43 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 81.2
09/18/2008 7:53 DAL798 MD80 D 12R 81.1
09/01/200810:38 KFS720 672Q D 12R 80,6
09/02I2008 5:41 DAL1113 MD80 D 12R 80.4
09/19/200815:18 NWA19 8744 D 22 80.4
Report Generated: 10/10i2008 13:24 ' 29 '
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
(RMT Site#22)
Anne Marie Trail, Inver Grove Heights
Dafert'ime Flight Number AircrafE Type Arri'val/ _; Runway "Lmax(dB) `.
• -. Departure , _.
09/20/2008 21:19 NWA764 ' 8757 D 12R 86.7
09/02/200$ 10:31 NWA1150 DC9Q A 30R 82.6
09/12/200813:42 NWA218 B757 A 30R 82.1
09/25/2008 5:38 DAL1113 MD80 D 12R 80.9
09/01/200814:07 AAL2337 MD80 D 12R 80.8
09/17/200814:18 NWA9801 6742 D 12R 80.7
09/23/2008 22:52 DH�197 672Q D 12R 80.6
09/19/2008 8:01 DA�798 MD80 D 12R 80.5
09l17/200813:20 NWA1068 DC9Q D 12R 80.5
09/28/200815:31 NWA1492 DC9Q D 12R 80.5
(RMT Site#23)
End of Kenndon Ave., Mendota Heights
DatelTime ' Flight Number 'AircrafE;Type.;, Arr�val/.,�, � Runway '. Lmax(dB) "
Departure
09/21/200811:56 NWA1150 DC9Q D 12L 95.5
09/15/2008 21:35 NWA1148 OC9Q D 12L 95.4
09/24/2008 21:22 NWA1148 DC9Q D 12L 95.1
09/18J200815:00 NWA865 OC9Q D 12L 95.1
09/19/200814:25 NWA1471 DC9Q D 12L 94.6
09/13l200813:28 NWA672 DC9Q D 12L 94.4
09/28/200811:58 NWA1150 DC9Q D 12L 93.5
09/26/2008 20:25 NWA796 DC9Q D 12L 93.5
09/06/2008 22:09 NWA1148 DC9Q D 12L 93.4
09/19/2008 7:00 NWA744 DC9Q D 12� 93.3
(RMT Site#24)
Chapel �n. & Wren Ln., Eagan
Date/Time Fli ht Number ' AircrafE T e Arrival/: : Ru'nwa ` Lmax dB
J, . Yp ,.. ,: ; .. Y . . � ) : ,
Departure
09/01/200810:37 KFS720 B72Q D 12R 86.$
09/02/2008 8:00 DAL798 MD80 D 12R 86.6
09/20/2008 5:35 DAL1113 MD80 D 12R 86.4
09l23/2008 22:52 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 86.4
09/12/2008 22:49 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 86.1
09/04/200815:10 NWA19 B744 D 12R 86
09/20/2008 6:13 AAL1718 MD80 D 12L 85.5
09/19/2008 8:01 DA�798 MD80 D 12R 85.3
09/14/2008 8:03 NWA721 6757 A 30R 85.2
09/21/200812:41 DAL1621 MD80 D 12R 85.1
C
- 30 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Top Ten �oudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
(RMT Site#25)
Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd., Eagan
Date/Time ' ght Number AircrafE °T e.' '' ArrivaU Runwa �max dB
Fli Yp - Y � ) ,
; , .:.
,.
� ` Departure:
09/09J2008 23:05 GCI705 B72Q D 17 85.2
09/19/2008 9:45 AAL2321 MD80 D 17 80.8
09/23/200815:30 NWA19 B744 D 22 80.7
09/18/2008 20:28 DHL304 B72Q D 17 80.5
09/04/200815:09 NWA19 B744 D 12R 80
09/17/200812:14. NWA1150 DC9Q D 12R 79.6
09/15/2008 20:40 DH�304 B72Q D 17 79.3
09/01/200815:29 AAL352 MD80 D 17 79.2
09/26/2008 8:35 AA�1448 MD80 D 17 79.2
09/23/200810:18 NWA789 DC9Q D 17 78.9
(RMT Site#26)
6796 Arkansas Ave. W., Inver Grove Heights
Date/Time FlightNumber AircraftType Arrival/ , ` Runway Lmax(dB)' �
. :, •
' Departure `
09/15/2008 23:54 NWA9800 6742 D 12R 91.2
09/11/2008 9:49 ADB2298 Unknown D 12R 88.4
09/23/2008 23:22 GC1705 B72Q D 12R 86.4
09/26/2008 0:29 CC1705 B72Q D 12L 86:3
09/01/200810:38 KFS720 B72Q D 12R 86
09l19/20081:28 NWA9802 8742 D 12R 85.2
09/22/2008 22:46 Df-1L197 B72Q D 12R 84.3
09/10/2008 22:35 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 83.7
09/04/2008 9:07 FDX3810 A300 D 12R 82.8
09/09/2008 22:38 DHL197 B72Q D 12R 82.7
(RMT Site#27)
Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S., Minneapolis
DatelTime Flight Number AircrafE Type A�rival/ ` Runw�
,,
Deparfure
09/05/2008 7:04 NWA456 DC9Q D 30L
09l05/200811:39 NWA452 DC9Q D 30�
09/05/2008 7:58 DAL798 MD80 D 30L
09/12/200812:42 DAL1621 MD80 D 30L
09/17/2008 5:39
09/05/2008 12:29
09/05/2008 13:31
09/14/2008 7:55
09/06/2008 7:57
09/15/2008 16:49
DAL1113
DAL1621
AA�1227
DAL798
DAL798
NWA458
Report Generated: 10l10/2008 13:24
30L
30L
30L
30L
30L
30�
Lm.ax(d6)
90.2
88.9
88.3
88.2
87.7
86.3
86
85.9
85.9
85.9
- 3'I -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
(RMT Site#28)
6645 16th Ave. S., Richfield
Date/Time Flight.Number Aircraft Type 'Arrival/ '. ` Runway ' �max(dB)
Departure -
09/30/200815:10 NWA1176 DC9Q D 30L 90.2
09/03/2008 7:59 NWA866 DC9Q D 301. 89.5
09/11/200817:09 NWA146 DC9Q D 30L 89.4
09/03/2008 7:24 AAL1361 MD80 D 30L 89.2
09/06/200819:27 NWA1461 DC9Q D 30L 88.8
09/14/200817:51 NWA146 DC9Q D 30L 87
09/17/200819:22 NWA1535 DC9Q D 17 86.4
09/18/2008 7:13 NWA138 DC9Q D 17 86,2
09/17/2008 20:40 DHL304 B72Q D 17 86.1
09/27/2008 6:17 AA�1718 MD80 D 30L 86.1
Date/Time
09/03/2008 9:43
09/27/2008 14:12
09/16/2008 14:56
09/03/2008 20:19
09/16/2008 15:31
09/08I2008 11:46
09/15/2008 14:55
09/08/2008 15:32
09/16/2008 8:26
09/14l2008 20:08
'' Date/Time
09/17(2008 19:23
09/30/2008 20:34
09/30/2008 7:11
09/04l2008 11:27
09/06/2008 7:25
09/0412008 16:59
09/17/2008 7:05
09/30/2008 6:54
09/10/2p0$ 16:01
09(11l2008 10:33
(RMT Site#29)
Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S., Minneapolis
Flight Nu'mber Aircraft;Type , �: Arrival/ Runway
Departure
AAL2321 MD80 D 30R
AAL593 MD80 D 30R
NWA865 DC9Q D 30R
NWA796 DC9Q D 30R
AAL352 MD80 D 30R
NWA1150 DC9Q D 30R
NWA865 DC9Q b 30R
NWA793N DC9Q D 30R
AAL1448 MD80 D 30R
NWA1741 DC9Q D 30R
(RMT Site#30)
8715 River Ridge Rd., Bloomington
Fligfit Number ` Aircraff Type. Arrival/ ` � Runj
Departure
NWA1535 DC9Q b 1 �
DHL304 B72Q D 1 �
NWA138 DC9Q D 1 �
NWA1527 DC9Q D 1 �
NWA456 DC9Q D 1 �
NWA458 DC9Q D 1 �
NWA456 DC9Q D 1;
NWA448 DC9Q D 9 �
NWA793 DC9Q D 1 �
NWA454 DC9Q D 1;
Lmax(dB) ;`
86.6
86.2
85.4
85.1
84.9
84. S
84.8
83.8
83.7
83.5
�Y . . : ' Lmax(dB) ..
94.3
93.1
93.1
93
92.7
92.6
92.6
92.5
92.4
92.3
_ 32 _ Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
C..
C
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
Date/Time
09(23/2008 15:30
09119/2008 15:16
09/23/2008 18:01
09/26/2008 11:11
09/19/2008 17:26
09/23/2008 19:41
09/26/2008 7:28
09/17/2008 6:56
09/06/2008 6:30
09/11/2008 11:26
(RMT Site#31)
9501 12th Ave. S., Bloomington
Fliglit Number Aircraff Type ArrivaU.' ' Runway ,�
Departure
_.
NWA19 B744 D 22
NWA19 8744 D 22
NWA1533 . DC9Q D 17
AAL1180 MD80 D 17
NWA1533 DC9Q D 17
AAL1358 MD80 D 17
CC11706 B72Q D 17
BMJ64 BE80 D 17
UA�497 8735 D 17
AAL1180 MD80 D 17
Date/Time FI
09/23/2008 19:42
09/23/2008 19:31
09/0512008 5:40
09/29/2008 5:36
09l23/2008 18:35
09/19/2008 17:26
09/19/2008 19:09
09/08/2008 7:19
09/18/2008 16:04
09/15/2008 11:35
(RMT Site#32)
10325 Pleasant Ave. S., Bloomingtc
ghtNumber Aircraft:'fype`' Arrival/ .'..`
Departure
AAL1358 MD80 D
NWA1432 DC9Q D
DAL1113 MDSO D
DA�1113 MD80 D
AAL1854 MD80 D
NWA1533 DC9Q D
NWA1535 DC9Q D
NWA138 DC9Q D
ADB250F Unknown D
NWA187 A320 D
(RMT Site#33)
North River Hills Park, Burnsville
Lmax(dB)
91.6
88.7
84:5
83.8
82.7
81.1
80.4
80.2
80.1
79.8
Runway . Lmax(dB)
17 80.1
17 78.6
30L 78.4
30L 78.1
17 78
17 78
17 77.3
30L 77
17 76.7
17 76.5
Date/Time Flight Number : 'Aircraft.Type ' `,Arr�val/ -'.' < Runway Lmax(dB) : , :
,
Departure
09/11/200813:43 AAL1227 MD80 D 17 82•7
09/07/2008 8:46 AAL1183 MD80 D 17 82.1
09/06/2008 7:11 AAL1361 MD80 D 17 81.2
09/09/2008 6:07 AAL1361 MD80 D 17 81
09/19/200811:23 NWA1527 DC9Q D 17 80.7
09/24/2008 7:13 NWA138 DC9Q D 17 80.1
09/04/2008 8:49 AAL1183 MD80 D 17 80.1
09125/200$ 7:24 CC11706 B72Q D 17 79.9
09/12/200816:21 NWA1531 DC9Q D 17 79.8
09/07l2008 9:43 AA�2321 MD80 D 17 79.5
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24 - 33 -
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 20Q8
(RMT Site#34)
Red Oak Park, Burnsville
batelTime Flight Number
Aircraft;Type, Arrival/.; Runway Lmaz(dB)
_
Departure
09/16/2008 22:46 DHL197 B72Q D 17 79.5
09/06/2008 7:11 AAL1361 MD80 D 17 78
09/17/2008 7:06 NWA456 DC9Q D 17 77.4
09/07/2008 9:43 AAL2321 MD$0 D 17 76.8
09/30/2008 20:35 DH�304 B72Q D 17 76.7
09/06/2008 7:03 AAL1718 MD80 D 17 76.4
09/24/2008 7:13 NWA138 DC9Q D 17 76
09/09/200811:25 NWA1527 DC9Q D 17 75.7
09/09/200817:28 NWA1533 DC9Q D 17 75.5
09/0812008 6:1$ AA�1718 MD80 D 17 75.4
(RMT Site#35)
2100 Garnet Ln., Eagan
' Date/Time Flight Number , Aircraft Type „ Arnval/."- ,. Run'way ' Lmax(dB) ..:.'
Departure
09 _ ,
l05/200$ 22:47 DHL197 B72Q D 17 86.9
09/04/200819:39 AAL1854 MD80 D 17 86.3
09/16/2008 22:46 DHL197 B72Q D 17 84.4
09/11/2008 7:55 CC11706 B72Q D 17 84.4
09/19/2008 22:44 DHL197 B72Q D 17 84.4
09/16/2008 20:48 DHL304 B72Q D 17 83.9
09/04/200815:19 NWA1176 DC9Q D 17 83.8
09/08/200811:19 DAL1551 MD80 A 35 83.7
09/30/2008 6:14 AAL1361 MD80 D 17 83.3
09/101200819:40 NWA1461 DC9Q D 17 83.2
` Date/7'ime _
09/05/2008 22:48
09/13/2008 17:48
09/17/2008 8:02
09/03(2008 18:27
09/24/2008 7:48
09/07/2008 7:01
09/19/200$ 22:45
09/07/2008 6:47
09/16/200$ 17:55
09/24/2008 11:52
(KM I 5ite#�6)
Briar Oaks & Scout Pond, A�
Flight Number Aircraft Type Arriv
Depar
DHL197 672Q D
FDX728 DC10 A
NWA1524 A319 A
FDX728 DC10 A
NWA1652 A320 A
NWA744 DC9Q D
DHL197 B72Q D
NWA448 DC9Q D
FFT100 A319 A
NWA368 B757 A
Ie Valley
Runway
•e
17 —
35
35
35
35
17
17
17
35
35
Lmax(dB) ,.
84.5
84
82.9
82.7
82.1
82.1
82
81.6
81.2
81.2
- 34 - Reporf Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
�,
C
Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP
September 2008
`Date/Time ;
09/04/2008 10:03
09/10/2008 16:21
09/28/2008 16:22
09/22/2008 15:10
09/20/2008 17:29
09/10/2008 15:16
(RMT Site#37)
4399 Woodgate Ln. N., Eagan
�=light Number. Aircraft:Type Arrival/ : Runway . Lmax(dB) :
OPT782 H25B
NWA1465 DC9Q
NWA1465 DC9Q
NWA1459 DC9Q
AAY4203
N WA1459
AAY8123
NWA458
NWA1461
NWA454
�
�
�rture
D 17 87.4
D 17 83.3
D 17 82.5
D 17 82,3
D 17 82.2
D 17 82.1
D 17 82.1
D 12R 82
D 17 81.8
D 17 81.7
(RMT Site#38)
3957 Turquoise Cir., Eagan
_ Date/Time Flight Number Aircraft.Type _ ArrivalL . Runway ,: l
_..
_ Departure . . `
09/12/200815:04 AAY8123 MD80 D 17
09/19/200813:52 NWA494 DC9Q D 17
09/12/200815:16 NWA1459 DC9Q D 17
09/12/200815:51 AF
09/19/200814:09 A�
� 09/25/200816:56 NV'
'� � 09/20/2008 17:28 AA'
09/12/200$ 19:22 NW
09/09/200816:53 NV'
09/04/2008 20:19 NV'
(RMT Site#39)
3477 St. Charles PI., Eagan
17
17
17
17
17
17
17
�
;. .
: �
�
�
: •
: :
�
�
: •
September 2008 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summarv
The top ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for September 2008 were comprised of 87.7%
departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the DC9Q with 34.1 % of the highest Lmax
events.
� � September 2008 Technical Advisor Report Notes
Unknown fields are due to unavailability of FAA flight track data. Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the
month of September 2008.
Report Generated: 10/10/200$ 13:24
-35-
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events D,NL
September 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
_..
Date #1 #2 #3:' #4; #5 '#6 ' #7 #8 #9.,; #10 #.11 #12- #13 #14 #15
09/01 /2008 58.7 60.9 64.3 61.3 68 67.7 35.9 35.3 NA NA 30.8 36.9 59.3 61.7 60.1
09/02/2008 57.1 57.7 63 60 69.6 71.5 60.6 63.1 NA 32.6. NA 41.4 56.6 60.9 56
09/03/2008 53.3 56.4 60.9 63.9 72 73.3 63.8 61.2 33.1 34.8 41.3 29.7 45.3 60.7 47.6
09/04/2008 59.6 63.3 65.5 61.2 69 67.8 42.5 36.3 33.8 NA NA 45.5 58.6 64.4 61
09/05/2008 54.8 59.3 60.9 60.8 71.6 73.1 61.6 62 NA 30.3 29.5 35.9 43 60.5 47.3
09/06/2008 53.9 53.2 59.3 55.9 66.8 68.1 58.7 63.3 NA '31.1 44 41.4 52.6 61.6 54.5
09/07/2008 52.2 53.1 56.7 57.9 66.9 70.7 61.8 58.6 27.9 42.3 39.5 35.5 NA 58.8 37.5
09/08/2008 51 55.9 54.6 55.4 66.7 68.2 61.9 58.3 NA NA NA NA 35.6 57.6 45.2
09/09/2008 56.1 62.1 62.3 61.4 66.5 68.9 54.9 50 30.3 NA NA 27.8 55.4 61.4 59.7
09/10/2008 59.9 64.5 65.8 64.2 68.8 70.2 46.6 34.2 NA NA 41.2 NA 59 61.7 62.3
09/11/2005 60.9 61.2 67.5 61.9 72 72.3 60.8 61.2 NA NA NA NA 52.9 62.6 57
09/12/2008 55.2 57.2 61.8 60.4 71.1 69.9 62.5 57.1 50.4 55 44.1 NA 54.$ 66.9 56.1
09/13/2008 57.4 60.2 63.6 61.3 70 71.2 58.1 54.5 NA 36.2 35 NA 49.9 62.1 53.8
09/14/2008 53.5 54.7 60.9 59.6 69.1 72.3 64.3 58.4 NA NA NA NA NA 60 33.7
09/15/2008 54.7 54.9 60.3 58.6 69.8 70.3 63.6 58.7 NA NA NA NA 59.7 63:2 61.4
09/16/2008 54 53.8 57.4 5$.2 67.9 71 60.4 59.2 NA NA NA NA 39.7 61.3 45.9
09/17/2008 57.2 59 63.3 60.2 68.9 67 53.7 52.7 40.2 56.9 49.1 31.9 51.6 61.3 55.3
09/18/2008 59.8 61.5 66.5 61.8 70.3 68.6 40.1 35.9 30.1 NA NA 36.4 58.8 62.8 62.9
09/19/2008 56.9 60.6 62.7 61.4 67.7 71.4 56.6 55.2 47.6 NA NA 46.2 56.6 64.5 57.9
09/20/2008 57.1 59.8 63.4 61.2 67 66.7 NA NA 44.2 57.6 55.2 29.6 52.2 63.7 54.6
09/21 /2008 59.1 58.8 64.9 59.5 65.7 66.6 30.2 42.1 34.2 34.1 NA NA 57.2 61.1 60.5
09122/2008 59.2 62.1 65.7 61.9 69.5 67.8 51.2 37.8 NA NA NA NA 58.2 62.9 60.9
09/23/2008 61.7 61.5 68.1 62.8 71.7 69.2 42.9 36.2 45.1 45.2 39 42.3 59.9 63.3 62.6
09/24/2008 56.5 60.6 59 61.1 67.7 71.3 59.8 59.9 NA NA NA NA 54.1 63 56
09/25/2008 59.1 62.6 64.8 64.4 69.4 69.8 40.9 40.3 NA NA NA NA 57.6 62.5 61.6
09/26/200$ 58.6 60 65.8 62.5 72.1 68.6 49.5 40.8 NA 35.5 35.4 34.8 59.9 61.6 61.2
09/27/2008 53 53.3 58.5 58.9 68.5 69.9 62.8 57.1 43.9 51.6 52.8 NA 49.2 60.3 45.6
09/28/2008 58.5 60.7 64.2 60.8 68.8 67.1 37.1 33.8 52.5 54.6 42 26.2 56.6 61.6 59.7
09/29/2008 54.6 53.9 58.7 58.1 67.3 71.7 63.8 63 NA NA NA NA NA 59.5 44.2
09/30/2008 55.3 54.8 60.3 60.5 70 74.3 65.4 64 44.2 NA 42.8 41.6 32.5 60.6 43.1
Mo.DNL .:57.4 59,7 63.5 :.61. 69.4 70.4 59.8 58.1 42 . 48 43.9 37.3 55.6` 62 2 58.2
C.
- 36 - Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
September 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
`Date #16" #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25 #26 #27 #28 #29
09/01/2008 60.7 56.6 63.5 49.6 NA 56.4 49 65.1 56.7 51 56.9 36 54.1 NA
09102/2008 63.5 34.6 56.2 50.5 49.5 55.2 55 62 59.2 43 56.1 55.5 58 58.7
09/03/2008 66.1 57.5 66.7 54.5 49.1 41.5 56.9 46.2 61 45.9 48 65.6 62.3 56.1
09/04/2008 68.2 45.3 57.7 54.4 30.1 56.5 57.4 66.3 61.1 55.9 60.3 35.2 59.2 NA
09/05/2008 65.3 54 58.2 56.1 56.4 47.5 57.5 54 602 38.1 50.2 58.5 59.4 57.9
09/06/2008 65.4 47.4 58.7 50.9 53.1 51.5 57.2 64.1 60.6 45.9 52.5 56.4 55.5 53.5
09/07/2008 64.3 34.6 50.8 49.7 36.8 37.3 56.6 42.6 58.5 33.3 43.4 55.3 55.8 56.1
09/08/2008 62:3 46.6 56.3 52.9 4d.6 34.3 54.3 44.1 56.7 43.7 46.9 54.6 56.7 52.6
09/09/2008 63.2 53.5 60.7 55.9 51.5 50.3 55 63.4 59.6 56.1 57.5 50.9 58 51.7
09/10/2008 61.8 52.5 60.1 53.8 38.8 55.1 51.5 66.3 57.1 52 59.5 35.7 57.8 NA
09/11/2008 63.4 46.4 58 49.7 47.1 46.9 54 61.1 59.7 47.2 53.3 50.8 58.6 52.3
09/12/2008 6$:2 33.4 52.2 48.5 34.1 56 58 63 63.1 50.9 55.6 59.8 57.6 54.3
09/13/2008 66:3 55 57.3 46.7 40.8 46 56.7 60.4 60.3 50.1 48.2 52.6 54.2 51
09/14/2008 69.4 56.4 54.2 49.6 44.2 30.7 56.7 44.2 60.3 45.2 41.3 55.2 58.9 57.4
09/15/2008 64.3 51 55.7 49.9 47.4 55.8 56.9 65.8 60 46 60.4 58.9 57.2 53.8
09/16/2008 66.6 50 58.5 54.5 46.1 40 57.3 53.5 60.6 46.2 49 54.9 56.5 56.2
09117/2008 65.3 NA 59.7 552 NA 49.1 55.8 59.3 59.3 51.8 502 57.4 59.3 51.2
09118/2008 63.8 52.8 59.6 54 41.9 54.3 54.7 66.9 59.6 53.5 58.8 36.9 59.9 31.2
09/19I2008 66.7 47 59.3 52.9 47.3 58.5 56.4 63 62 54.7 58.1 43.9 53.1 54.9
09/20/2008 64.4 NA 55.5 52.1 38.5 51.6 55.1 62.6 61.1 47.1 55.2 NA 51.8 NA
09/21 /2008 61.8 26 54.4 512 32.8 51.7 53.3 65.2 57.4 49.4 55.8 36.9 54.6 NA
09/22/2008 62,9 34.2 57.6 52.7 NA 55.9 54.5 64.6 58.4 53.4 59J 45 57.9 27.6
09/23/2008 63.9 49.8 60.7 57.4 41.9 58.9 55.2 68.4 59.4 53.5 60.9 31.6 57.4 35.2
09/24/2008 66.1 51.9 58.7 53 51.8 52 58.3 62.7 61.5 52.9 56.7 57.9 57.4 53.9
09/25/2008 62.7 35.8 58 53 32.3 53.4 56.7 66 59.5 54 59.1 42 59 NA
09/26/2008 62.4 36 56.6 53.6 34.4 56.1 53.4 67.7 58.1 53.9 60.8 32 56.2 NA
09/27/2008 64.5 43.8 43.5 43.1 49.8 48.2 55.6 54.4 58.8 41.5 49.4 54.3 59.9 52.3
09/28/2008 63.3 25.5 54.5 49.7 NA 53.6 51.6 65.7 57.8 51 56.7 30.8 54.9 NA
09/29/2008 63.1 NA 52 49.9 46.8 42.7 56.1 48.7 59.1 43.1 47.8 54.6 60.7 57.3
09/30/2008 64.3 44.3 55 53.3 40.1 32.8 56.9 51.6 60.2 33.9 46 58.4 60.9 56.5
Mo.DNL 65 50.5 58.7 52:8 47:2 53.3 55.9 63.4 59.8 50:9 56.4, 55:7 58 53.3
Report Generated: 10/10/2008 13:24
-37-
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL
September 2008
Remote Monitoring Towers
Date. #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 .#36 #37 #38 .#39,,
09/01 /2008 59.6 46.7 36 45.8 34.9 44.2 39.1 45.7 48.2 50.7
09/02/2008 57.8 44.3 35.6 40.9 36.1 53.5 54.9 42 44.2 47.5
09/03/2008 50.6 42.6 37.5 34.2 49.9 53.6 56.2 42.4 NA NA
09/04/2008 65.2 46.8 34.3 47.1 32.4 51.9 41.5 51.5 53.9 54.5
09I05/2008 65.6 54.1 53.6 50.5 48.1 60.5 60 44.7 45.9 NA
09/06/2008 64.7 51.5 46.4 43.5 45 55.4 55.9 47.1 NA NA
09/07/2008 63 36.5 46.4 48.1 44.8 58.4 58 38.8 NA NA
09/08/2008 64.9 45.7 49.5 43.2 51.1 57.5 58.4 38.1 NA NA
09/09/2008 66.2 50.8 47.4 52.6 44.7 57.6 55.5 49.4 51.4 56.8
09/10/200$ 62.3 45.8 42.3 40.8 28.3 50.4 40.8 52 52.5 55
09/11/2008 61.2 44.4 40.9 44.6 34.8 50.9 50.7 39.4 47.1 48.7
09/12/2008 59.5 44.9 41.7 42.1 39.9 50.8 52.5 47.6 51.5 50.9
09/13/2008 52.6 36.2 33.5 NA 26.3 47.4 49.7 38.3 40.1 � 36.5
09/14/2008 60.9 43.3 49.4 41.6 42.1 49.8 53.8 27.2 NA NA
09/15/2008 59.9 43.9 42.6 42.4 48.6 54.2 54.2 33.4 35.9 45.6
09/16/2008 66 50.7 50.4 45 50.2 59.9 57.3 48.7 36.8 57.4
09/17/2008 672 53.6 49 52.3 51.7 55.3 54.6 49.4 51.1 53.9
09/18/2008 64.6 50.5 45.2 44.1 33.6 47.2 41.2 49.9 51.8 54.7
09/19I2008 63.4 50.8 46.8 47.5 42.6 56 53.5 48.3 51.8 57.6
09/20/2008 62.6 42.9 36.5 46 372 49.1 3$.6 49.7 51.5 54.3
09/21/2008 60.8 42.6 28.2 43.2 34.6 45.9 40.1 47.9 51.5 53.6
09/22/2008 62 48.9 38.9 40.2 30.6 46.6 33.9 49.6 51.5 54
09/23/2008 62.1 55.2 48.9 47.8 41:9 47 38.7 46.9 51.5 55
09/24/2008 64.3 49.7 47.3 52.3 42.5 58 57.7 31.5 33.$ 49
09/25/2008 62.4 48 42.6 45.1 31.5 47.1 39.1 49 52.7 55.3
09/26/20Q8 62.3 47.8 38.3 44.1 37 49 36 51.4 53 55.2
09/27/2008 47.8 35.9 38.8 NA NA 48.2 51.4 38.9 35.1 NA
09/28/2008 60.8 42.6 32.3 42.6 29.8 45.3 NA 48.1 50.6 53.5
09/29/2008 63.9 39.5 47.9 41 42.9 56.3 57.7 NA 33.9 33.5
09/30/2008 65.7 41.5 41.5 43.6 47 58.6 58.6 44.3 NA NA
'. Mo:DNL 63.1 48.5 45:8 46.3 44:7 54.6 54.2 47.2 49 52.4
- 38 - Report Generated: 10(10/2008 13:24
('
C.
i�I� �ii:.1`'r1 11:
,•. - �� . • • �-•. - • •• � .
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport
�
�
` ` .�
�� ��
��
�:�,� � � �
*This report is for informational purposes only
and cannot be used for enforcement purposes.
Metropolitan Airports Commission
3274 Carrier Jets Departed Runways 12L and 12R in September 2008
3122 (95.4%) of those Operations Remained in the Gorridor
3274 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure
Operations
3122 (95.4°/a) Total 12L & 12R Carrier
Departure Operations in the Corridor
(,.
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Reporf Generated: 10/08/2008 09:17 Page 1
' ),
Metropolitan Airports Commission
108 (3.3%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
North of the 090° Corridor Boundary During September 2008
Of Those, 0( �jReturned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Snelling State Park
Page 2 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 10/08/2008 09:17
Metropolitan Airports Commission -
44 (1.3%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were
South of the Corridor (South of 30L Localizer) During September 2008
Of Those, 0( —°)Returned to Corridor Before Reaching SE Border of Ft. Srielling State Park
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 10/08/2008 09:17 Page 3
�
Metropolitan Airports Commission
8(0.2%) Runway 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departure Operations were 5°
South of the Corridor (5° South of 30L Localizer) During September 2008
Page 4 Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 10/08/2008 09:17
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Top 15 Runway 12L/12R Departure Destinations for September 2008
Airport City H�d g� �g #Ops ; Totai Ops
ORD CHICAGO (O'HARE) 124° 130 4%
SEA SEATTLE 278° 96 2.9%
BIS BISMARCK 291 ° 81 2.5%
YYZ TORONTO 95° 81 2.5%
FAR FARGO 312° 78 2.4%
YWG WINNIPEG 330° 71 2.2%
PDX PORTLAND 272° 57 1.7%
GFK GRAND FORKS 316° 56 1.7%
DTW DETROIT 705° 53 1.6%
BOS BOSTON 97° 51 1.6%
ATL ATLANTA 149° 50 1.5%
SFO SAN FRANCISCO 251 ° 48 1.5%
AMS AMSTERDAM 83° 46 1.4%
LAX LOS ANGELES 238° 44 1.3%
MOT MINOT 304° 44 1.3%
C
Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis. Report Generated: 10/08/2008 09:17 Page 5
,� �' �k �� �>
5�:;�E��`- .v-+,. ""-���,k ^t� ,�.� e�`p�:i" i „� ."�; rx� y ✓,�, s,,,
c. G fi r F? �. F �. I" r" .t% t't?t t
'�' t � ��i� ,� �n' � �,� � � � R.��� h� � (� � ':� t6i ,�� i �:
.� � ..�: .x�� � �Fr �c„�'' hF *'c.a' +x, �I �: 't�, �
.aw� �� � €c'+ �e:.
��
��
145
A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments
Volume 20, Number 36 October 31, 2008
Congress
r�CI-NA SEEKS AT I.,EAST $600 MILLION
FOR AIRPCDRTS IN E�ONOMIC STIIVIITLLTS B�I,IC,
In a statement submitted for the Oct. 29 hearing on "Investing in Infrastructure:
The Road to Recovery" before the House Transportation and Infrastruciure Comrnit-
tee, Airports Council Internarional—North America (ACI-NA) called for at least $600
million in aiyport infrastructure funding to be included in the Economic Stimulus bill,
as well as relief for auports from the Atternative Miuimum Ta�c (AMT) disincentives
that apply to private activity bonds used to finance new construction.
ACI-NA also urged passage of a multi-year Federal Aviation Adminisiration
(FA.A) reauthorization bill to help stunulate economic growth and add jobs throughout
the United States.
At the hearing, Rep. James Oberstar (D-MI�, chairman of the Committee, said
that the House and Senate will consider an economic recovery and job creation initia-
tive two weeks after the Nov. 4 election.
Said ACI-NA, "Auport operators have been worlting tirelessly with their airline
partners to fuld ways to reduce costs in an effort to maintain air service. This has re-
sulted in mauy capital projects being delayed so that rates and charges assessed to air-
(C'ontiiiued ore p. 146)
�
�� ST'�.T�+ G�� P�.,�T 11VCL�1D�+ S�D��IGl�S
O�+' ���F1� C�+ �l� S�+ �+ 1� ME�C�O�"OLIT�t �.�+ AS
On Oct. 28, the Federal Aviation Adrninish•ation issued its 2009-2013 "FAA Flight
Plan," a which is a strategic docmnent intended to help the ageucy prepare for the fu-
ture.
The Flight Plan notes that over the next fve years, the FAA plans to increase avia-
tion capacity and reduce congestion in seven metropolitan areas that �nost affect delay
in the aviation system.
Those areas are San Francisco, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, Chicago, Charlotte, New
York, and Philadelphia.
The FAA also plans to redesign the airspace in these metropolitan areas. It has al-
ready begun a controversial redesign of the airspace in the New York/New
Jersey/Philadelphia area, whicb sparked a dozen lawsuits over increases in noise and
aircraft emissions impacts and compliance with Nationai Environmental Policy Act re-
quirements. It remaius to be see whether airspace redesigns in the other five metropoli-
tan areas will be as controversial.
The Flight Plan addresses environmental issues associated with capacity enhance-
ments.
In terms of noise impact, the FAA's goal over tt�e next five years is to reduce the
(Contirzued on p. I46)
Airport Noise Report
Ii2 T'iZtS .Is'sl�e. e .
Congress ... ACI-NA urges
House T&I Committee to in-
clude at least $600 million
for airports in economic
stimulus bill - p. 145
FAA ... Agency plans air-
space redesigns in five more
metropolitan areas - p. 145
Idulenzaking ... FA.A NPRM
wauld require U.S. aircraft
on international flights to
carry aircraft noise certifi'c�.-
tion information - p. 146
lb�icdwa,y ... FAA seelcs corn-
ments on Chicago's applica-
tion to use PFCs for sound
insulation and city's applica-
tion to lease airport to private
company - p. 147
Buchanan Field ... County
approves Master Plan/pro-
posed Part 150 noise compat-
ibility program - p. 147
News Briefs ... City of Au-
rora, CO, seeks Airport
Noise Coordinator ... Ameri-
can Airlines enters agree-
ment with Boeing to
purchase 42 Dreamliners
with option for more - p. 148
October 31, 2008
Congress, from p. I45
lines can be maintained or even lowered. While delaying cap-
ital projects may help in the short term to stabilize airline
costs, each deferred project represents foregone construction
jobs and economic activity which is critical during this time
of economic uncertainty."
ACI-NA aTso strongly supported the testimony of William
DeCota, Aviation Director, Port Authority of New York and
New Jersey. DeCota noted that auport funding in the Eco-
nomic Stimulus package could help create 35,000 higb-pay-
ing jobs at airports. He also said enactment of long-term
FAA reauthorization with an increase in the cap on the Pas-
senger Facility Charge (PFC) user fee to $7.00 would allow
airports to keep pace with skyrocketing cosEs and complete
safety, security, capacity and environmental projects which
are necessary to continue serving the traveling public safely
and efficiently.
A multi-year reauthorization of the FAA is critical for air-
ports to move forvvard with projects that will generate eco-
nomic development and employment. The fact that PFC
user fees have not been increased and AIP has been operating
under several short-term extensions for more than a year,
spanning two fiscalyears, has caused several projects to be
delayed, ACI-NA said.
It also noted that the credit inarlcet for airport bonds,
lrnown as private activity bonds, or PABs, has dried up due to
the higher than normal interest rates applied to these bonds
since the interest earned on them is subject to the Alternative
Miuimum Tax. Many airports are now struggling to find
buyers for construction bonds, a situation that could be sig-
nificanlly improved if the AMT penalty fiom airport PAB
bonds were eliminated, similar to relief provided to the hous-
ing industry in July 2008, ACI-NA told the committee.
��, ���,�P �. l�s
number of people exposed to sigvificant noise by 4 percent
per year t7u•ough FY 2013, as meastued by a tl�ree-year mov-
ing average, from the three-year average for calendar years
2000-2002.
FAA plans to improve aviation fuel efficiency over the
next five years by improving fuel efficiency by another 1 per-
cent over the FY 2008 levei (for a total of 7 percent) through
FY 2009, and i percent each subsequent year through FY
2013 to 11 percent, as measured by a three-year moving aver-
age of the fuel burned per revenue mile flown, from the
three-year average for calendaz years 2000-2002.
To meet its environmental goals, FAA plans to:
• Impxove analytical tools to better understand tl�e rela-
rionship between noise and emissions and different types of
emissions and to provide the cost benefit analysis capability
necessary for data-driven decision—making;
• Increase aircraft noise and emissions mitigation activi-
ties at the enviromnental Center of Excellence and.Airport
Cooperative Research Program to mitigate environmental im-
pacts;
146
• Work wifli several airports (including Los Angeles, San
Diego, Louisville, Charleston, andAtlanta) to implement
Continuous Descent An�vals (CDA) for night operations and
to iniriate research into CDA applicability to airports with
greater traffic levels, general mixed fleets, and mixed opera-
tions; and
• Implement Environmental Management Systems to en-
sure that FAA operations protect the environment, meet statu-
tory and regulatory environmental requirements, and improve
reliability and cost effectiveness.
Between 2009 and 2013, the FAA plans to commission
nine new ruuway/ta�ciway projects and increase aunual seiv-
ice volume at the 35 most delayed airports by 1 percent annu-
ally.
The FAA also said it would support capacity projects that
have been targeted for streamlined environmental reviews.
EAA's 2009-2013 Flight Plan is available at the agency's
web site: http://www.faa.gov/news/updates.
Rulemaking
�1 � ,� � i i r : , ' ,,
� ,1 ,. , . � .. � :
Operators of U.S. registered civil aircraft flying outside
the United States would be required to carry aircraft noise
certification information on board their aircraft under a No-
tice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) issued by the Federal
Aviation Administration on Oct. 23.
The agency said that the proposed rule is needed to en-
sure that U.S. operators have consistent noise certiiication in-
formation onboard when they fly outside the couziiry.
"Several years ago, the FAA became aware of instauces
in which U.S. aircraft were detained at foreign airports when
the noise status of the airplane was questioned. In many
cases, tlle flight crew had not been able to provide relevant
information either because the Aircraft Operations Manual
(AOM) or Flight Crew Operating Manual (FCOM) did not
contain such infoimation, or because the information was not
aggregated in one location in the on-board manual. Some for-
eign authorities have asked U.S. flight crews to either pro-
duce a noise certificate or show the noise status of the
airplane from on-board documents," FAA explained.
FAA did not specify wbat airports have questioned the
noise status of U.S. aircraft but it is most likely European air-
ports, some of which base landing fees on noise emissions.
The International Civi1 Aviarion Organization (ICAO) ad-
dressed the issue of noise documentation by setting up a task
group in 2001. Based on the worlc of the group, ICAO
adopted an amendment to its Annex 16 noise certification
standazds in 2005 to require that "documents attesting noise
certification shall be approved by the State of Registry and
required by that State to be carried on the aircraft."
The amendment provided three options to satisfy the re-
quirement to cany noise documentation:
Airport Noise Report
October 31, 2008
• A stand alone State-issued noise certificate in wluch the
mandatoiy noise inforrnation is contained in a single docu-
ment;
• Two complementary documents, one of which may be
the Airplane Flight Manual (AFNn or the Airline Operations
Manual (AOM); and
• Three complementa�-y documents.
Option tv✓o was designed to accomrnodate the needs of
the United States, which, unlike otller countries, does not
have the legal authority to issue noise certificates.
FA A said that it is proposing to amend Part 91 to add a
new paragraph in Section 91.703 requiring operators that fly
outside the United States using aircraft subject to ICAO
Annex 16 Uolume 1 to carry aircraft noise certification infor-
mation onboard the aircraft.
"While the regulatory amendment is simple, we are seek-
ing comment on the proposed format of the documentation
and the best place to have it located on board the aircraft,"
FAA said. The agency included in the NPRM a draft aircraft
noise documentation form. It encouraged all carriers and
other affected operators who leave the counhy to comment on
the proposed regulation and to suggest workable alternatives
to the proposed rule.
The puUlic has until Jan. 21, 2009, to comment on the
FAA's proposal (Docicet No. FAA-2008-1097), which can be
obtained from the Federal eRulemaking Portal:
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online rnstructions for
sending comments electronically.
�iidway Iiat'Z
�;���;��a� ����� �� ����.�� ���;
�� ������� ���� ��������
On Oct. 24, the Federal Aviation Administratiou issued a
notice seelcing public comment on an apptication by the City
of Chicago to impose and use $668.7 million in Passenger Fa-
cility Charge (PFC) revenue to support various projects, in-
cluding residential and school sound insulation, at Midway
International Airport.
Some of the PFC revenue would support a residential
sound insulation program at Midway that began in 2005 and
is expected to be completed in 2011. However, the City of
Chicago is seelcing to lease Midway to a private company,
which would not be obligated to extend the insulation pro-
gram beyond that date. That is a condition of the lease that
concerns some local officials who fear additional insulation
may be needed beyond 2011 if airport operations expand.
The PFC notice comes tliree days after the FAA an-
nounced the beginning of a 60-day public comment period on
Chicago's final application for Midway ta participate in the
agency's Aiiport Privatizatioi� Pi1ot Program.
On Oct. 14, the City of Chicago filed its final application
to operate Midway under a 99-year lease to Midway Invest-
ment aud Development Company in return for $2.51 billion.
147
In its final application, khe city requested an exemption to per-
mit the City to use revenue from the lease of the airport prop-
erty for non-airport purposes and to forego the repayment of
federal grants.
Under the pilot privatization program, the FAA adminis-
trator has the authority to grant such exemptious.
FAA will conduct a public meeting at the Marriott
Chicago Midway on Nov. 8 to receive public comment on the
fmal application, which has been filed under FAA Docket
Number 2006-25867. It can be examined on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov. Comments can also be submitted
to the FAA through that site. They must be received by Dec.
22.
For further information on Chicago's application to lease
Midway, contact Kevin Willis, a compliance specialist in
FAA's Office ofAirport Compliance and Field Operations;
tel: (202) 267-8741.
Public comments on Chicago's PFC application inust be
received by Nov. 24 and can be sent to James C. Keefer,
FAA, Manager, Chicago Airports District Office, 2300 E.
Devon, Room 320, Des Plaines, IL 60018.
Fur further information, contact Keefer at tel: (847) 294-
7336.
�ucharzan Faeld
�, �� � , .�. ,�� . ,�; ,, ��� �� .�.
� �.
�� � �. �.. 4 �� ;�p � � � : � F�� ��� ..
On Oct. 28, the Contra Costa County (CA) Board of 5u-
pervisors approved a new 20-year master plan for Bucha.nan
Field that seeks to attract more corporate aircraft and reduce
noise impact by reducing flight training activities and directed
departing aircraft away from residential areas.
In 2005, the County had coiisidered a proposal to close
the airport, located nortl� of San Fraucisco ui the Bay.4rea,
and build up to 6,000 homes on the airport site. However, the
County opted to keep the airport operating.
As an outgrowth of the master plauning �rocess, the
County has formed a community relations group for flie air-
port, wl�ich will provide advise on issues of concern, provide
a foium for information exchange, and help improve the air-
port's relationship witli the surrounding community.
The County also approved a proposed Part 150 Airpoit
Noise Compatibility Program for the airport in conjunction
with the new master plan. The Part 150 program, which has
not been submitted to FAA yet, includes recommendations to
use Required Na�igation Performance (RNP) deparlttre pro-
cedures for turbojet aircraft using Flight Management Sys-
tems, to use noise abatement departure procedures, to
implement a Fly Quiet Program, to install a noise monitor-
ing/flight track movitoring system with multilateration, to up-
date noise signage and brochures, to designate pre-flight
engine run-up areas, and to construct a grouud run-up encio-
sure.
Airport Noise Report
October 31, 2008
� � _ • �'. : i � i'. !�
John J. Corbett, Esq.
Spiegel & McDiazmid
Washington, DC
Carl E. Burleson
Director, Office of Environment and Energy
Federal Aviation Adininistration
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
Gatzlce, Dillon & Ballance
Carlsbad, CA
Peter J. Kirsch, Esq.
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rocicwell LLP
Denver
VincentE. Mestre, P.E.
President, Mestre Greve Associates
Laguna Niguel, CA
Steven F. Pflaum, Esq.
McDertnott, Will & Emery
Chicago
Mary i.,. Vigilante
President, Synergy Consultants
Seattle
I�•
In B�ief...
Aurora Seeks Airport Noise Coordinator
The Ciry of Aurora Planning Deparhnent announced that it has an ex-
ciring opportunity to join their Comprehensive Planning team! The Air-
port Noise Coordinator is a contract position that performs professional
work related to monitoring and addressing Airport Noise related and envi-
ronmental issues that may impact the City of Aurora.11iis position aiso
supports the environmental planning functions of the Planning Depart-
ment and environmental operations of the City. Salary is $46,485.85 -
$68,310.74 annually
We are seeking candidates with a Bachelor's Degree in environmenta]
planning, environmental management, or a directly related field and at
least 2 years progressively responsible environmental compliance experi-
ence. Prefer Master's degree and experience with airport noise. An
equivalent combination of education, training and experience that demon-
strates required knowledge, skills and abilities may be considered.
Please visit the City of Aurora website, www.auroragov.org, for details
and to complete an application and suppiementai questionnaire on-line.
Apply ASAP! Applications accepted unril the position is filled. Not only
is the City of Aurora a great place to live, it's a great place to work! Con-
tact Human Resources at (303) 739-7225 with questions. The City ofAu-
rora is an Equa1 Opportunity Employer.
A�eY-ican ��i�es �cqui��g TDrea�alin�rs
American Airiines anuounced that it has entered into a purchase
agreement with Boeing under which it intends to acquire an initia142
Boeing 787-9 Dreamliners scheduled for delivery beginning in 2012 and
ending in 2018, with the right to purchase up to 58 additional 787s that
may be scheduled for deliveiy beginning in 2015 and ending in 2020.
AMR Chairman aud CEO Gerard Arpey said the agreement would
support American's wide-body replacement efforts as well as the intema-
tional growth that is expected after American, British Airways, and Iberia
achieve antitrust i�ruxiwuty and implement a joint business agreement for
flights between NorthAmerica and Europe.
"The 787 witl help reduce our fuel and maintenance costs, lessen our
environmental impact, and support our goal of providing industry-leading
products and services over the long haul," Arpey said. Foriunately, our
agreement with Boeing, our long-time partner, altows for significant flex-
ibility to rnanage our fleet replacernent and growth plans in the way that
best meets all of our stakeholders' interests."
American said previously tllat it will take delivery of 76 Boeing 737-
800s in 2009 and 2010 as it replaces its nairow-body MU-80 fleet.
. • � , � , � � , r
Anne H. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest C�, Ashbum, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
e-mail: editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price $850.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the intemal or personal use of specific clients,
is grauted by Aviation Emissions Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.
{
C�
,�� , ..: r� ; �
p LJl �t � r�(t �K��� � �� ry � Y , � `�,,=L ��' -ri r uIr a � �� y;z, ` � .,
-o-£: �1., � � r,.�r� �ko.... h �Cy.. � ��-.,�' 4. � �,,,-
_ �• �. .
A weekly update on litigation, regulations, and technological developments
Volume 20, Number 35
SSTs
SST SHOULD �IAV� NO GREA'�'ER NOISE IMPACT
THAN S�iJBSONIC PLANES, FAA POLICY STATES
The Federal Aviation Adininist�•ation updated its policy on noise limits for futtue
civil supersonic aircraft on Oct. 22 to specify tbat aaiy fuhue rulemaking the agency
might issue "wonld propose that any firture supersonic ailplane produce no �•eater
noise impact on a cotmiaunity tUan a subsonic airplane."
The agency issued the policy statement to provide guidance on supersonic aircraf
i�oise liinits to manufacturers that are cansidering designs for supersonic aircraft.
"Supersonic aircraft tecl�7iologists, desig�zers, and prospective manufacturers I�ave
approa.ched the FAA and international Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) for guid-
ance on the feasibility of changing the cunent operational limitations. T'he U.S. regu-
lation prolubits civil supersonic aircraft flight over land. Before the FAA can address
change in operatioiial restrictions, it needs thorough reseaa•ch to serve as a basis for
any regulatory decisioiis. Public involvement will be essential ui defining an aceept-
able sonic boom requirernent, and public participation would be part of any potential
ruleinaicing process," the agency said.
"��hile technological advauces ui supersonic au•craft technology continue,
many factors still will need to be addressed. At preserit, the FAA's guiduice for super-
(Corttinared orr p. 142)
ldesearcla
l��W P1�R'I'I�I�R. S'I"�Tl)��+ S �+�C�TS �I�t �IV��'A1�10E+,
SIJ�EP Il�IS'�'�T�Ali�C�, SO�T1�1� T�1�1S1VIISS��I�
The research consortitiun PARTNER recently announced tJiree new projects that
will be uudertalcen to improve tools for assessing, modeling, and predicting atlnoy-
ance, sleep disturbanee, and sound struetural tra�lsmission.
Project 24, Noise Exposure Response: Annoyance
This project will be carried out by the Pennsylvania State University and Purdue
University. It is an outgrowth of au earlier PARTNER Project (No. 2).
"The goal is to develop a deeper understanding of l�ow noise afFects annoyarice in
conmiunities in proxiinity to airports. The ultimate aim is to conshuct models to pre-
dict annoyance from future airport developments or changes in air tra�c patterns,"
PARTNER explained.
"Of particular interest is the iinpact of low frequency uoise on annoyance level.
Project 24 is assessing how louduess, spectral balance, rougluiess, tonality, and fluctu-
ation streilgtl� of aircraft noise can impact subjective annoyance inetrics. Of particular
interest is the itnpact of low fi•equency noise on annoyance level. Included is a design
study for the developineiit of a portable indoor sonic boom/noise siml�lator. Tl�is de-
(Corztinued o�r p. 1�2)
Airport Noise Report
141
October 24, 2008
In �'his Issue...
SSTs ... FAA updates it pol-
icy on SSTs to s�ecify that
future supersonic aircraft
should produce no greater
noise i_rnpact on cominunities
ihan subsonic planes - p. 141
Research ... PARTNER an-
nounced three new s�idies
focusing on aircraft noise:
The goal of Project 24 is a
deeper understanding of an-
noyance, especially from
low-frequency noise. A�1 in-
door sonic booin simulator
will be developed.
The goal of Project 25 is to
develop models to predict
sl.eep disruption.
Tlle gaal of Project 26 is to
develop models to estimate
the transmission of low fre-
quency noise through win-
dows - p. 141
Part I50 Pr�ogr•am ... FAA
announces approval of noise
mitigation prograrns for Las
Vegas MeCanan Interna-
tional Airport and Meadows
Field iiz Bakersfield, CA.
The agency also is reviewing
a proposed amendinent to the
program for Gulf�ort-Biloxi
International- p. 142
October 24, 2008 142
SSTs, fi orrz �. 141
sonic aircraft is the same as for subsonic, that the same noise
certification limits apply for supersonic aircraft when flown
in subsonic flight configurations," the agency explained.
Policy Statement
The FAA issued tl�e following policy statement:
"The Federai Aviation Adnliniseratioil(FAA) is commit-
ted to aviation's long-standing efforts to achieve increasingly
effective uoise abatemeut at its source. We anticipate that any
fuhue Notice of Proposed Rulemaking issued by the FAA af-
fecting the noise operating rules would propose tliat any fii-
ture supersonic airplane produce no greater noise impact on a
community than a subsonic airplane. Subsonic noise limits
are prescribed in 14 CFR Part 36. The latest noise liinit in
Part 36 is Stage 4, wliich applies to the developtnent of futtue
supersonic aitplaues operating at subsonic speeds. Noise
sta�idards for supersonic operation will be developed as the
unique operational flight characteristics of supersonic desi�is
become known and tlie noise impacts of supersonic flight are
shown to be acceptable."
The FAA said lhat it lasl issued a noise policy state-
ment for civil supersouic aircraffi in 1994 (59 FR 39679, Au-
gust 4, 1994). At that time, the noise standa�•d iu effect for
new type cerCificate applicaiions was Stage 3.
On July 5, 2005, the FAA adopted a new noise standard
for subsonic jet airplanes and subsonic transport category
large auplanes. That standard, Stage 4, applies to any person
filuig an application for a new airplane type design on and
after January 1, 2006.
Since March 1973, supersonic flight over land by civil
aircraft has been ��rohibited by regulatiou in the Uuited
States. Tl�e Concorde was the only civil supersonic airplane
tllat offered service to the United States, and it is no longer in
service.
"Inferest in supersonic aircraft teclmology has not dis-
appeared. Current research is dedicated toward reducing the
impact of sonie booins before they reach the ground, in aii ef-
fort to rnake overland flight acceptable. Recent research has
produced promising results for low boom intensity, aiid has
renewed interest in developing supersonie eivil aireraft tliat
could be considered environmentally acceptabie for super-
sonic flight over land," FAA said.
For further iiifonnation, contact Laurette Fisher iu FAA's
Office of Environn�ent and Eilergy; tel: (202) 267-3561; e-
maii: Laurette.fisher a faa.gov.
PARTNER, fron� p. 141
vice will allow researchers to test "boom" existing residences
with arbitraiy waveforms to measure subjective annoyance.
It could be used to ci�aracterize subjective and physical re-
sponse of different types of construction. This device could
also be used for subsonic studies of noise transmission and
human response."
In �nother study in Project 24, researchers wili investi-
gate whether lalowledge of the noise source (e.g., air, road,
rail) influeuces am�oyance, and, if so, liow to quantify that
source dependence in the amioyance model. "Metrics will be
developed to better account for cumulative noise events over
tiine. Such inodels could help project the amioyance impact
of an airline switching to a quieter fleet but increasing the
mm�ber of daily operaeions," PARTN�R said.
"While noise is identified as die top enviromnental con-
cern in most surveys of communities near airports, current
annoyance models are simplistic and inadequate. Project 24
research will result in more accurate tools to predict how a
comruunity will react to changes in airport operations. Tlie
results will help planners and policymakers assess more ef-
fective approaches to address problems and reduce negative
impact," according to PARNTER.
Project 25, Noise Exposure Response:
Sleep Disturbance.
This study will be conducted by Purdne University. The
goal of this project is to understand the impact of aircraft
noise on sleep, and to develop rnodels that predict sleep dis-
ruption for a given aircraft noise profile.
"Chronic sleep disturbance is associated with multiple
health issues including cog�iitive difficulties, exhaustion, high
blood pressure, diabetes, and depressiou. Project 25 builds on
the outcomes of PARTNER Project 2 t11at investigated sleep
awakening and sleep structure models. The aim is to build ou
these and on other models by better characterizing noise lev-
els (illcluding boti� louduess aud rate of onset) and by specifi-
cally assessing sleep stage disturbance. By coupling the
resulting sleep disturbance models with noise prediction
tools, it will be possibie tu investigate potential awakening
pattems for a wide range of airport and air traff'ic scenarios,"
PARTNER explained.
The sleep disturbance model "will be tuned to produce re-
sults that replicate thase observed in field studies (usually
conscious awalcenings) and in laboratory sh�dies (botl� awalc-
enings and sleep structure). The simulation will qua»tify how
mueh and wl�at type of data should be collected in future
sleep disturbance studies to fully vatidate the proposed
higher-fidelity models," according to PARTNER.
Project 26, Sound Structural Transmission
Project 26 also will be conducted by Purdue University. It
will develop nun�erical models to evaluate the transmission
of low frequency iioise (LFN) through elastic �anels such as
windows, doors, walls and roofs.
"The models and simulations will be optimized for appli-
caUility to residential buildings in airport ueighbqrhoods. The
long-term goal is to develop appropriate models and metrics
to assess and mitigate the indoor iinpact of outdoor-generated
LFN," PARTN�R said.
The major outcome of the project "wilt be the develop-
ment of simple models for estirnating the transmission of
LFN through single-pane and double-pane windo��s. The
Aiiport Noise Reporc
C
October 24, 2008
study will highlight and quantify tlie need foi• appropriate
elastic mowiting methods that optimize window noise-block-
ing perfonnance. This will help window manufacturers and
Yhe building indushy to establish criteria for classifying win-
dow acoustic perfarmance."
Tlle study also aims to provide coiisumers with necessary
infonnation for clioosii�g windows with matched mounting
supports as a means of ininimizing the ingress of LFN.
PARTNER (Parhiership for AiR Transporfation Noise aiid
Emissions Reductian) is Ceiiter of Excellence sponsored by
the Federal Aviation Administration, tlie Nationa Aeronautics
and Space Adniinistration, and Transport Canada.
Pr�Yt I50 Pr�ogr^a»a
. . . ...,, ,, r., ...
�,� . � �. .;�� �
On Oct. 21, the Federal Aviation Adminishation an-
nounced its approval of Part l50 �i�port Noise Compatibility
Programs for L1s Vegas McCarran international Airport and
Meadows Field in Bakersfield, CA.
The program for McCan•an contained 22 proposed ac-
tions for noise aUatement and noise mitibation on aud off tlle
aiiport. FAA granted outright approval for 11 of ihe 13 noise
aUatenlent melsures, disapproved two noise mitigation rueas-
ures, and approved all nine n.aise niitigation measures.
r�pproved moise abateme�at measures include:
• Maintain and clarify the existing infoin�al preferential
r�uiway use progratn:
•�iicotuage the use of existing noise abatement flight
h�acks to ensure that aircraft fly over Izistoric flight con-idors;
^ Continue to use desib �ated engii�e run-up areas at tl7e
air��ort for mainte�iance purposes:
^ Continue to sul�port the use of general aviation reliever
airports in the Clark County Airport System;
• Continue the bianm►al noise monitoring p�•ograrn for
fixed-wing aircraft and a�uival »oise monitoring for I�elicop-
ter tour traffic;
• Conduct a study to determine if tlie use of advanced
navigational technol.ogies could eiiable piloYs to follow inore
predictable and precise flight tracks, thereby minimizing over
flights and noise in ar•eas developed with noise-sensitive land
uses; �
• Conduct a study to detei-mine the feasibility and noise
reduction benefits of establishing conkinuous descent ap-
proach (CDA) procedures at the airport;
• Conduct a study of the "distaut" noise aUatement de-
parture }�rofile (NADP) as described in FAAAdvisory Circu-
lar 91-53A, Noise Abatement Departure Pro�les, to
determine the potential Por reducing aircraft noise; exposure
in the airport environs;
• Continue to encourage airlines to use quieter aircraft
and establish a recognition program for airlines that adhere to
the principles of the Deparhnent of Aviation's "fly qt�iet and
143
safely" program;
• Conti�iue to support legislalion that establishes quieter
engine standards for all aircraft types;
• Continue to pt�rsue the construction of a Southern Ne-
vada Regional Heliport;
• Expand the public infonnation program related to the
NCP for LAS and publish a"fly quietly and safely" prograin
brochure.
Approved noise mitigation measures include:
• Establish a voluntary progra�n to acquire properties de-
veloped with aiiport-incompatible land uses tliat will be ex-
posed to aircraft noise of DNL 70 dB and higher based on tlie
2011 noise exposure map;
• EstaUlisl� a voluntary progra�n to acquire proper-ties de-
veloped with aiiport-incompatiUle land uses tllat will be ex-
posed to aircraft noise of DNL 65-70 dB based on the 201 l
noise exposure map and adjacent properties, as appropriate,
to prevent neighborhood aUandoninent;
•�staUlish a voluntary sound iusulation and/or transac-
rion assistance program for properties developed with airport-
incoinpatible land uses that will be exposed to aircraft noise
DNL 65 ta DNL 70 based ou the 2011 noise exposure inap;
• Coniinue to work with the Clark Co�.u�ty Department of
Comprehensive Planning, the City of Henderson Commnnity
Development Department, the Uuiversity of Nevada, Las
Vegas (UNI.V), and other appropriate agencies to a�nend land
use and/or master plans to discourage the introduction of
noise-sensitive and otherwise incompatiUle land uses in areas
exposed to aircrai� noise of DNL 60 and higlier;
• Continue to su�portxedevelopment in areas exposed to
aireraCt naise of DNL 65 and higlaer tl�at are transitioning
from noise seusitive land tGses to auport-coinpatible land
uses;
• Update the Aiiport Environs Overlay District (AEOD)
inap to reflect changes in aircraft noise patterns that have oc-
ctured since tlie AEOD was last updated, and add a uew AE-
60 snbdistrict;
• Revisit land use compatibility requirements codified in
tl�e AEOD ordir�ance and update sections of the ordinance, as
necessary, to include a new AE-60 suUdistrict and to reflect
souiid attenuation requirements recently adopted as part of
tl�e MUOD ordinance;
• Continue to actively support enforcement of the AEOD
througl� ongoing review of development applications and
coi�dition airport related issues as appropriate;
• Pursue the establishment of airport noise disclosure re-
quirements at the 1oca1 or state level.
Disa�proved Measures
FAA disapproved the following measures:
• Continue to support legislation that establishes quieter
engine standards for all aircraft types;
• Request that FAA increase the length of the final
straight-iu approach seglnent for arrivals ou Runways 1 L,
1R, 7L and 7R during visual meteorological conditions.
Airport Noise Reporf
October 24, 2008
�� � I�� �� � �����
�c��1i�i.Y��:iii:��7;�����
John J. Corbett, �sq.
Spiegel & McDiannid
Washington, DC
Carl E. Burleson
Director, O�ce of Environment and Energy
Federa) Aviation Administration
Michael Scott Gatzke, Esq.
Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance
Garlsbad, CA
Peter J. Kirscli, Esq.
Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
Denver
Vincent E. Mestre, P.E.
President, Mestre Greve Associates
Lagw�a Niguel, CA
Steven F. Pflaum, Esq.
McDermott, Will & Emery
Chicago
Mary L. Vigilante
President, Synergy Goizsultlnts
Seattle
144
Meadows Field
The FAA granted outright approval for all 10 proposed noise mitiga-
tiou actions in the Meadows Field Part 150, including:
� Cantinue voluntary policies that limit turbojet training operations;
• Continued informal preferential use of runways 30 LJR
• Continue to use intersection takeoffs for single and twin-engine air-
cral't at the taxiway F intersection on Runway 30R;
• Revise Airport land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) Zones to re-
flect lhe ultimate runway configuration if the third parallel iunway is in-
cluded in the Master Plan and pursued by the County;
• Maintain c�inpatibility planned areas within the Auport Influeuce
Area;
• Maintaining compatible zoning within Aizport Influence Area;
• Ainend Section 4.8 of the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan
(ALUCP) to iuclude compatibility criteria that explicitly identify compat-
ible land uses;
• Amend Section 4.8 of the Airport Land Use CompatiUility Plan
(ALUCP) to incorporate prescriptive i�oise standards to addr�ss airport
uoise coi�cenis in iiew coi�struction and major alterations to existing
stnictures;
• Continue i�oise complaint tracking pro�•am;
• Update noise exposure ma�s and Noise Coinpatibility Program;
• Monitor implementation of updated F.A.R. Part 150 Noise Compati-
bility Program.
For fiuther infornlation on the Meadows Field Part 150 prograin, con-
tact Victor Globa in FAA's Los Angeles Airpot�ts Dish-ict Office; tel:
(310) 725-3637.
For further infotniation on the MeCan•an International Part 150 Pro-
gram, contact David ICessler, an environme�ital specialist in FAA's West-
ern Pacifc Region; tel: (310) 725-3615.
The FAA's Record of Approvat for• botli programs will be available
on-line at:
llltp://www. faa.gov/ai rpor-ts_airh•affic/airports/enviro�lmenial/aiiporL_nois
e/part_] 50/states/.
Gulfport-�iloxi Amendrrieni �Jnc�er IZeview
FAA announced on Oct. 24 tl�at it will cornplete a review of a pro-
posed. amendnlent to tlie Part 150 airport noise coinpatibility program for
Gulfport-Biloxi Inteinational Airport in Guifport, MS, by April 16, 2009.
Public conlments on the aruendinent — which proposes to add acquisi-
tion of non-eoinpatibile land to the prograni, wllich has foeused on sound
insulation — ends on Dee.16.
For further infonnation, contact Williatn Scl�uller in FAA's Jackson,
MS, Aiiports District O�ce; tel: (COl ) 664-9883.
� r r � ',� ,� r � � ;�
Anne A. Kohut, Publisher
Published 44 times a year at 43978 Urbancrest Ct., Ashbw-n, Ua. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528.
e=mail: editor@aiiporinoisereport.com; Price $850.
Authorization to photocopy items for intemal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients,
is granted by Aviation Emissions Report, provided diat the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy
is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA.
C