The URL can be used to link to this page

07-12-2006 ARC PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA July 12, 2006 — Large Conference Room 1. Call to Order — 7:00 P.M. 2. Roll Call 3. Acicnowledge Eagan Notes from May 9, 2006, Joint Meeting of Eagan/Mendota Heights Airport Relations Cornmission. 4. Unfinished and New Business: a. Review of Updated ARC Brochure b. Review Plan of Action Policy c. Discuss Joint Meeting with Eagan d. NOC Update — Councilmember Duggan e. Cities Meeting Update — Chair Petschel f. Updates for Introduction Bood 5. Acknowied�e Receint of Various Renorts/Corresnondence• a. Technical Advisor's Report — May 2006 b. Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis — May 2006 c. Airport Noise Report, June 28, 2006 � �� ,.. 6. Other Commissioner Comments or Concerns 7. Uncomin� Meetin$s City Council Meeting July 18, 2006 — 7:30 NOC Meeting July 19, 2006 —1:30 Public Input Meeting July 18, 2006 — 7:00 (Richfield City Hall) MAC Meeting July 17, 2006 - 1:00 8. Public Comments 9. Adiourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids. This may not, however, be possible on short notice. Please contact City Adniinistration at 651-452-1850 with requests. �� r� �+'� � � � A��, i��as,t .c�t a .c{y�.'+�`'"' Y" �� ,� '"e. k7 aX� �.�*•*. �i. ✓f"'p ^�'^ �`� '�,�'n �„�'t.� 'i� .�. �� '�.'€�. g7t�. �� r�%. � �y�*' �� ': ;�e r�. k �. ni,� �' �'� u � ..t'�. � :��tS'" C .u�i. 7�x. � . � � -<.�' `as..a- I i,.r '� :f-. " .+' �. �Ls• �'».r,�°i �t..n�� r' k�ii, „�ti A weelcly update on litigat'ton, regniations, and technological developments Volumel8,Number20 June 28, 2006 Long Beacla ----- CITY COUNCIL UPI�OLDS EIR ON TERMINAL Ih This �ssue... � ; , , ..�. , � In what was described as a tense and sometimes rancorous meeting, the Long Beach City Council June 20 upheld the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on a new terminal at Long Beach Airport and approved a site pian for an airport terminal that was smaller than city officials wanted but larger than some residents opposed to expanding the in-town airport sought. The City Council rejected an appeal by 49 city residents to overturn an earlier Long Beach Planning Commission vote certifying the EIIZ. The Council then narrowly approved a site plan for a 97,545 square-foot terminal, smaller than the 133,000 square-foot terminal size sought by city o�cials but larger than the 79,000 square-foot terminal demanded by some council members and residenis. The City Council has not yet made a final decision on whether to replace the airport terminal, which was built in 1941 to handle DC-3 aircraft and was expanded somewhat in 1984 to handle overflowing passengers, and how to fund the project. In what could make the new terminal project more palatable to the community, the EIR. certification includes provisions for a sound insulation program for homes (Continued on p. 78) P3allas Love Field . �. � , -�'i , c �, - - - � _ i�; � ,�, F�, �., ,�, ,.� ,.. , ; ;�., , � ,, On 7une 15, American and Southwest Airlines ended a long-running battle and reached agreement on dropping the Wright Amendment, a 27-year-old federal law restricting long-haul flights by Southwest out of Dallas Love Field to only a few neighboring states. American had for years sought to retain the restriction, fearing long-haul flights out of Love Field by Southwest would hurt its operations at nearby Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport. Both airlines concluded, however, that it was to their benefit to set the terms of the agreement rather than having Congress do so. Congress, which has been steadily chipping away at the Wright Amendment, must still pass a law revising it by the end of the year in order for the airlines' agreement to take effect. The agreement also was signed by the mayors of Dallas and Ft. Worth. Under the deal struck by the local officials and the airlines, restrictions on long- haul flights out of Love Field will end in eight years, connecting flights will be allowed immediately, and the number of gates at Love Field will be capped at 20. Southwest will keep 16 gates and American and Continental Airlines will each have two gates. If other airlines want to begin service at Love Field, the three airlines already operating there will have to share their gates. (Continued o�� p. 78) Long Beacla ... The City Council approves the EIR on a new airport terminal but it is not as large as city ofFicials had , wanted - p. 77 Dallas Love Field ... South- westandAmericanAirlines agree to dropthe WrightAmendment, whichlimits long-haulflights, in eight years - p. 77 Bush Inte�•continental ... Texas congressman secures $750,000 in the House fiscal 2007 appropriations bill forFAA tliat 11e wants used for sound insulation and buyouts -p. 78 I'art I50 I'rogranz ... FAA approves inost ofnoise colnpat- ibility prograins proposed for Scottsdale Airport and Southwest Florida International- p. 79 AIPNoise Grants ... FA.A awards five airports grants totaling $16.2 millionfornoise mitigation projects - p. 79 News Br•iefs ... The law firm Kaplan Kirsclz adds three legal heavyweights to its roster ... Homeowners inMinneapolis and St. Paul ask court to certify as a class homes near MSP Interna- tional. The action is related to separate litigation over the extent of sound insulation - p. 80 June 28. 2006 within the airport's 65-70 DNL contour based on previous year contours (currently there are only 15), in exchange for avigation easements. The insulation program also would include schools within the airport's 60 DNL contour. The EIR certification also limited the number of aircraft parking spaces to 12, instead of 14. Currently there are 10 parking spaces for aircraft. The project would expand the number of gates at Long Beach Airport from eight to 1 l. Between August 2001 and 2003, the number of passengers using the airport increased from 600,000 to 3 million annually mainly because of increased commercial flights. Noise Ordinance Grandfathered In 1981, the City of Long Beach adopted a noise control ordinance limiting the number of air carrier flights to 15 per day and requiring the use of quieter airplanes. The airlines challenged the ordinance and, in an effort to avoid pro- tracted litigation, entered into a settlement agreement with the city under which a new Airport Noise Compatibility Ordinance was adopted which allowed air carriers to operate a minimum of 41 flights per day and commuter carriers to operate a minimum of 25 flights per day. That ordinance was grandfathered under the federal Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (ANCA). In May 2003, the FAA reaffirmed the grandfathered status of the ordinance. Because the Long Beach ordinance is based on cumula- tive noise impact, additional commuter and air carrier flights can be accommodated if they do not exceed their respective Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) limits stipulated in the ordinance. The terminal area improvements sought by the city are designed to accommodate 4.2 million annual passengers, which is the total anticipated with the minimum number of flights allowed under the city's airport noise ordinance. Love �ield, fi�om p. 77 American Airlines said it decided to sign the agreement on the Wright Amendment because it limits the size of Love Field and includes enforcement provisions: two factors that were crucial to American. Southwest Airlines reportedly balked at the agreement initialiy because it included a nine-year waiting period for non-stop long-haul flights (which was later dropped to eight years) and because the airline felt that 16 gates were not enough to allow it to grow. However, foliowing hours of negotiation, Southwest officials acquiesced. DFW International Executive Director Jeff Fegan told the Star Telegram that he believes the agreement "will eliminate a great uncertainty that has palgued our airport over the years" and will help DFW "adjust our business plans as well as adjust for the future." DFW, he said, "can continue to grow and continue to be the economic engine of North Texas." Southwest Chairman Herb Kelleher, said the end of the long battle over the Wright Amendment signals that "there surely must be hope for world peace." 78 Busla Intef�coiitirzeiztal REP. POE SECURES $750,000 ( ��- FOR NOISE IN FUNDING BILL � Texas congressman Ted Poe (R) has secured $750,000 in the fiscal 2007 appropriations bili for the Federal Aviation Administration which he wants used specifically for the acquisition and sound insulation of homes near Houston Bush Intercontinental Airport where residents have been complaining about noise since a new runway opened over three years ago. In a June 14 press release, Poe, who serves on the House Transportation Aviation Subcommittee, said that the $750,000 "will not be subject to the FAA's determination and will be above the normal discretionary allocations to Bush Intercontinental for noise mitigation." "For the first time," said Poe, "we are embarking on new ground in government funding. While $750,000 is a small amount in comparison to the needs of the communiiy, I was able to secure this specifically for noise reduction at Inter- continental Airport and it is only the beginning." On June 14, the House of Representatives, on a vote of 406 to 22, approved its version of the fiscal 2007 Transportation- Treasury appropriations bill, which provides funding for the FAA and the federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) through which federal grants are distributed to airports. The Senate has not yet passed its version of the bill. ]Hfigh Priority]P�-oject The House report on its appropriations legislation lists Poe's $750,000 for an "Airport Noise Project" at Bush Intercontinental as a high priority airport project. It was the only "high priority" project among the 80 designated in the bill that specifically addresses noise. In an effort to address the noise problem caused by the opening of the new runway at Bush Intercontinental, Poe said he established an Airport Noise Task Force comprised of representatives of the FAA, area chambers of commerce, air traffic controllers, Continental Airlines, the Houston Airport System, local officials, homeowners impacted by the noise, and two grassroots comnnunity groups that were formed to address the noise problem: CITAIZGE (Coalition of Homeowners Associations Requiring Government Equity) and the West 45 Noise Group, an offshoot of CITAIRGE. "This has been a great opportunity for all sides of the table to come together and work towards solutions," Poe said. "As a result of these meetings like with most things, money was the bottom line. I am no stranger to innovative thinking and we learned this year that new doors can be opened and I will continue to find new solutions to old government problems." Airport officials said they would be pleased to receive the additional noise mitigation funding that Poe had secured but they would determine how best to use it. Meanwhile, members of the homeowners groups who live under the flight path of the new runway said June 22 that they want a solid noise reduction plan in place within the Airport Noise Report June 28, 2006 next six months. The West 45 Noise Group wants the airport, airlines, and FAA fo agree on noise abatement procedures as well as penalties for violating them. House Appropriations Bill The FAA will not calculate the aircraft noise and emissions set-aside in the AIP program until the House and Senate have both passed fiscal 2007 appropriations bills and ironed out the differences between them in conference. But overall FAA funding levels in the House bill are available. The House bill provides a total of $15.2 billion to the FAA, which is $1.4 biilion above the enacted level in fisca12006 and $2.4 billion above what President Bush � requested for fscal 2007. The bill includes $16 million to hire and train 132 new air traffic controllers and an additional $12 million above the President's request to hire and train safety inspectors in the FAA office of aircraft certification and flight standards. In terms of AIP grants, the House bill limits obligations to $3.7 billion for fisca12007. This is $950 million above the President's budget request and $185 million above the fiscal 20061eve1. In terms of research, engineering, and development, the House bill provides $10 million for the new Airport Coopera- tive Research Program and $16,008,000 for research on environment and energy (compared to $15,840,000 provided in fisca12006). �'a�t 1 Sf! �r�g��a�vz , ,� � � , � � ,� . , `�` ! -� � �' ' -�_" � � '� _� �•� '�` � _ :�' The Federal Aviation Administration recently announced its approval of Part 150 airport noise mitigation programs for Scottsdale (AZ) Airport and Southwest Florida International Airport in Fort Myers, FL. FAA granted outright approval to 27 of the 30 proposed noise mitigation measures in the Scottsdale program on June 19. Measures not approved by the agency included encour- aging the use of published approach patterns for one runway, encouraging FAA to chart visual flight procedures to a runway, and construction of an engine run-up enclo- sure. Among the noise mitigation measures approved in the Scottsdale Part 150 program were continuation of several noise abatement approach and departure procedures, continuation of a ban on nighttime touch-and-go operations and engine run-up procedures, relocation of the engine run- up area, adoption of noise overlay zones by the cities of Scottsdale and Phoenix, and consideration of zoning amendments by Scottsdale to require avigation easements and disclosure. The FAA's Record of Approval of the Scottsdale Part 150 program will be available on-line at http://www.faa.gov/arp/ environmental/14cfr150/index 14.cfin. '79 For further information on the Scottsdale program, contact Michelle Simmons, an environmental specialist in FAA's Westem-PacificRegion;tel:(310)725 �614. SW Florida Program The FAA on June 23 announced its approval of four of the five proposed noise mitigation measures included in the Part 150 program for Souehwest Florida International Airport. The agency disapproved a proposal to modify an exiting voluntary noise mitigation departure procedure pending submission of additional information documenting the noise benefits of the change. However, the agency approved continued use of the procedure, which was approved in an earlier Part 150 study as a means to move overflights away from a school. The four measures approved by the FAA were continued use of existing noise mitigation departure and approach procedures, purchase and installation of flight tracking equipment, monitoring and evaluation of the benefits of a curved RNAV (Area Navigation) approach to one runway, and updating noise overlay zones. The FAA's Record of Approval for Southwest Florida International's Part 150 program will be available on-line at the website listed above. For additional information on the program, contact Lindy McDowell in FAA's Orlando Airports District Office; tel: (407)812-6331;e�.130. AIP Csra�zts . . . � � � � � ;� ,� � ' � .. � :�, r ,, � ;,; :r. Between May 15 and June 20, the Federal Aviation Administration awarded five airports atotal of $16.2 million in federal AirporE Improvement Program (AIP) grants to support noise mitigation projects, according to data posted on the FAA's website: http://www.faa.gov/ airports_airtraffic/airports/aip/grantapportion data. The following airport proprietors received AII' grants for noise mitigation projects: • City ofModesto, CA, received a$285,000 grant to conduct a noise compatibility plan study at Modesto City County Airport (Harry Sham Field); • City ofChicago, IL, received a$250,000 grant for noise mitigation measures for public buildings near Chicago Midway International Airport; • City of Chicago, IL, received a$250,000 grant for noise mitigation measures for public buildings near Chicago O'Hare International Airport; • City ofNew York, NY, received a$440,310 grant for a school soundproofing project near 7ohn F. Kennedy International Airport; • City ofProvidence, RI, received a$15 million grant to acquire land for noise compatibility within the 70-74 DNL contour of T.F. Green State Airport. Airport Noise Report June 28, 2006 •II '+IJ1 �';��il .� �• ;�.•� John J. Corbett, Esq. Spiegel & McDiarmid Washington, DC Carl E. Burieson Director, O�ce of Environment and Energy Federal Aviation Administration John C. Freytag, P.E. Director, Chazies M. Saiter Associates San Francisco Michaei Scott Gatzke, Esq. Cratzke, Dillon & Ballance Carlsbad, CA Peter J. Kirsch, Esq. Kaplan, Kirsch & Rockwell LLP Denver Suzanne C. McLean Chief Development Officer Tucson Airport Authority Vincent E. Mestre, P.E. President, Mestre Greve Associates Laguna Niguei, CA 80 Iri Br°ie_ f ... � i Law Firm Expands The Denver-based law firm Kaplan Kirsch Rockwell, which specializes in environmental and transportation law, announced June 12 that it has added three attorneys to the firm and will open offices in Washington, DC, and New York City. New to the firm are Thomas R. Devine, one of the leading experts in the country on airport law; Arthur P. Berg, another wel]-respected aviation attorney who formerly headed federal regulatory and appellate affairs for the Port Authority ofNew York and New Jersey; and Charles A. Spitulnik, who specializes in regulatory and compliance issues regarding the planning, construction, and operation of urban rail systems. Prior to entering private practice, Devine served as vice president for legal and environmental affairs for the Airports Council International —North America, as general counsel for the National Airline Commission, and on the legislative staff of the Federal Aviation Administration's O�ce of the Chief Counsel. Berg has nearly 40 years experience in transportation law and has repre- sented the Airports Council International on a variety of matters, including litigation, First Amendment issues, financial matters, privatization, noise, security, and federal regulatory issues. Spitulnik has more than 25 years experience in representing sEate and local governments and railroad companies in federal regulatory, labor, and compli- ance matters. Berg joins the firm as senior counsel and will be resident in the firm's New Steven F. Pflaum, �sq. York o�ce. Devine and Spitulnik join the firm as partners and will be resident McDermott, Will & Emery Chicago in its Washington, DC, office. (, MaryL. Vigilante President, Synergy Consultants Seattie Class Aciion Status So�ght in M[S�' I.,avt�suit Homeowners in the cities of Minneapolis and Richfield, MN, asked a Hennepin County judge on June 21 to certify as a class homes around Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. The class could include as many as 3,500 homes. The legal action is separate from but related to a lawsuit filed in April 2005 by the cities of Minneapolis, Richfield, and Eagan,�MN, against the Metro- politan Airports Authority (MAC), the proprietor of MSP International, over the extent of the airport's sound insulation program. The three cities asserted in their lawsuit that the MAC had broken a promise to them by not providing the full sound insulation package to homes in the 60-64 contour ofMSP International (17 ANR 3 8). In December 2005, a Hennepin County Judge denied a motion by the MAC and Northwest Airlines to dismiss the litigation (17 ANR 175). More on this in the next issue. AIRPORT NOISE REPORT Anne H. Kohut, Publisher Published 44times ayearat43978 UrbancrestCt., Ashburn, Va. 20147; Phone: (703) 729-4867; FAX: (703) 729-4528. e-mail:editor@airportnoisereport.com; Price$750. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific clients, is granted by Airport Noise Report, provided that the base fee of US$1.03 per page per copy is paid directly to Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923. USA. . ,. . � � : : :• . � � = -� �� ;. ��„,� �p� "'i ��. � ,;� � 4 i . K 4 � +".�+SCyr.�� ,� �' ev�n w r v t . � r ,� + :�. -Y� �, � �: K� i�t �i' � �tt� ., _'*r""m4eyz�t++�,—.—k' . ;_,. � .... .. �cFi'i SJ j M �.�e�.'�l�.iy^�!��YWY�!.?�. � , .. .. :. •. ,� , .�,. • �. , ',. �� .� ..�. ../ : '' ../: •".. ',�� t, ; Table of C�ntents for 1VYay 2006 . c Complaint Summary 1 Noise Complaint Map 2 FAA. Available Time for Runway Usage 3 MSP All Operations Runway Usage 4 MSP Carrier Jet Operations Runway Usage 5 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition 6 MSP All Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 7 M5P Carrier Jet Operations Nighttime Runway Usage 8 MSP Top 15 Nighitime Operator's by Type 9 `� � . MSP Top 15 Nighttime Operator's Stage Mix 10. Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 11-14 MSP ANOMS Remote Monitoring Tower Site Locations Map 15 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 16 Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 17 Carrier Jet Arrival Ralated Noise Events 18 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 19 MSP Top Ten Aircraft Noise Events per RMT 20-32 Analysis of Dai1y and Monthly Aircraft Noise Events DNL 33-35 \1 A Product of the Metropolifan Airports Commission ANOMS Program MSP Complaints by City May 2006 Notr. Shadcd Columns rcpresent MSP wmptainu filed via thc Intemet. '�-� �� Sum of % Total ofCompluints may not cqual 100% due to rounding. (� "As olMay 2005, thc MSP Cnmpinints by Ciry report includes multiple / complaint descriptors per individual wmplaim. Thcrctorc, the number of '�--- �� complaint descriprors may be morc than the numberof rcported complaims. Report Generated: 06/13/2006 08:29 - � _ MSP International Air�ort Aviation Noise Complaints for Ma.� Number of Complaints per /�ddress �'@ � '.��..i: �;�;. � . 1-4 5-15 16-31 32-51 52-79 80-143 r�'�u',� �'"� : E� CGg,a` •y .. � �:� - 2- Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 Available Hours for Runway Use May 2006 Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 FAA Averaae Dailv Count Air Carrier 930 802 Commuter 443 388 General Aviation 92 103 Militarv 8 6 -3- � � •' . • � . • �••• . ��• Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. - 4- Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report May 2006 Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 5- May 20�6 MSP Carrier Jet Fleet Composition ;, FAR 1?art 36 Take ' F r , , Type ,Off No�se�Level ,:, ,A�rcraft Descr�ption i ,�� ,, 'Stage. ,� Cou,nt Percent ,., .. :. � , ,. ..,. B707 105.5 Boeing 707 Modifed Stage 3 3 2 0% DC10 103 McDonnell Douglas DC10 3 406 1.2% 8744 101.6 Boeing 747-400 3 72 0.2% DC8Q 100.5 McDonnell Dougias DC8 Modified Stage 3 3 77 0.2°/a L101 99.3 Lockheed L-1011 3 2 0% MD11 95.8 McDonneli Dougias MD11 3 2 0% B767 95.7 Boeing 767 3 2 0% A330 95.6 Airbus Industries A330 3 80 0.2% B72Q 94.5 Boeing 727 Modified Stage 3 3 358 1.1 % A300 94 Airbus Industries A30Q 3 144 0.4% A310 92.9 Airbus Industries A310 3 34 0.1 % MD80 91.5 McDonnell Dougias MD80 3 697 2.1% B757 91.4 Boeing 757 3 3277 10% DC9Q 91 McDonnell Douglas DG9 Modified Stage 3 3 4804 14.7% 8734 88.9 Boeing 737-400 3 4 0% A320 87.8 Airbus Indusfiries A320 3 4973 15.3% B735 87.7 Boeing 737-500 3 488 1.5% 8738 87.7 Boeing 737-800 3 1024 3.1 % 8733 87.5 Boeing 737-300 3 663 2% A318 87.5 Airbus Industries A31$ 3 63 0.2% 8737 87.5 Boeing 737-700 3 45 0.1 % A319 87.5 Airbus Industries A319 3 4131 12.7% RJ85 84.9 Avro RJ85 3 1571 4.8% BA46 84.9 Avro RJ$5 3 1 0% E145 83.7 Embraer ERJ-145 3 1124 3.4% E170 83.7 Embraer ERJ-170 3 186 0.6% B717 83 Boeing 717-200 3 902 2.8% CRJ 79.8 Canadair Regional Jet 3 7463 22.9% E135 77.9 Embraer ERJ-135 3 13 0% � ' ..."''.:�� .. � __'.:. � ...� r: ^ � �, . .� . Totals . �: ::. .. ! . .�F . . ' '� s.:, ,�� y ' ,,3 8�, r �:`r � _ . . .. _: .� , : 260...,., , Note: Sum of fleet mix % may not equal 100 % due to round(ng. Note: Stage III represent aircraft modified to meet ail stage III criteria as outlined in Federal Aviation Regulation /' (FAR) Part 36. This includes hushkit engines, engine retrofits or aircraft operational flight configurations. t=' •The Provided Noise levels from FAR Part 36 are the loudest levels documented per aircraft type during � take-off measured in EPNL dBA (Effective Perceived Noise Level). •EPNL is the levei of the time integral of the antilogarithm of one-tenth of tone-corrected perceived noise level of an aircraft flyover measured in A-weighted decibels. - 6- Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 • - � •••. • 1 1• ••IM. ' . � - '-•• �, ii• Note: Surn of RUS % rnay not equal 100% due to rounding. Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 7- Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. Runway Use Report May 2006 Note: Sum of RUS % may not equal 100% due to rounding. - $ - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 (' ( :. '� � May 2006 Top 15 Actual Nightfiime Jet Operators by Type 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. American AAL American AAL Atlantic Southeast Airlines ��ASQ America West AWE America West AWE America West AWE Continental Exp BTA DHL DHL DHL DHL American Eagle EGF American Eagie EGF American Eagle EGF _ FedEx FDX FedEx FDX FedEx FDX FedEx FDX Pinnac{e FLG Kitty Hawk KHA Ki«y i-iawk KHA Mesaba MES Mesaba MES Northwest NWA Norfhwest NWA Northwest NWA Northwest NWA Norihwesf NVVA Norfihwest NWA Sun Country SCX Airtran TRS United UAL United UAL United UAL United UAL UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS UPS Note: The top 15 nighttime operators represent 92.2% of the total nighttime carrierjet operations. Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 : : �:� � , . . � : � . � � : !1 � � �� . � : l� t � � C E : � . ; . . , � , � : t � � • l� : : : . � : : : � �� : : . � :� � �oo 650 600 550 �, 500 C O! ;Fa: 450 � ��_ 400 �C? � 350 s.: � 300 � � 250 200 15p 104 50 O -10- May 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines 10:30 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. AAL ASQ AWE BT�A DHL EGF FDX FLG KHR MES NWA SCX TRS UAL UPS :�1ti.Y��:e-FI'n�� (�hlanufactured� Stage�-3�i' St ge 3�.�`OSta e 2.; � ......_.. _.�. „..,:.. .._,,..-.... , _ . �....... i. w.�...._. .., ... ,.�..�.,�,. .,.. ....._.��___..._.._.........__.____....._.....__.__._._......_.._.,.._._...._.�._..�.__-._-'----._...___....._.:_..7 May 2006 Nighttime Fleet Stage Mix for Top 15 Airlines Report Generafed: O6/09/2006 13:30 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks -- Carrier Jet Operations — May 2006 May 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4210 Carrier Jet Arrivais May 1 thru 8, 2006 — 4181 Carrier Jet Departures � .,- _., �,� May 1 thru 8, 2006 — 282 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 1 thru 8, 2006 — 177 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: O6/09/2006 13:30 - 11 - Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Fiight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — May 2006 May 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4265 Carrier Jet Arrivals May 9 thru 16, 2006 — 4215 Carrier Jet Departures May 9 thru 16, 2006 — 273 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 9 thru 16, 2006 — 157 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures - 12 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 ___ _. _. l � Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — May 2006 May 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4245 Carrier Jet Arrivals May 17 thru 24, 2006 — 4239 Carrier Jet Depa�tures May 17 thru 24, 2006 — 296 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 17 thru 24, 2006 —163 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 13 - Airport Noise and Operafiions Monitoring System Flight Tracks Carrier Jet Operations — May 2006 � C /. May 25 thru 31, 2006 — 3651 Carrier Jet Arrivals May 25 thru 31, 2006 — 3602 Carrier Jet Departures May 25 thru 31, 2006 — 249 Nighttime Carrier Jet Arrivals May 25 thru 31, 2006 —159 Nighttime Carrier Jet Departures - 14 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 MSP International Airport Remote Monitorina Tower (RMT) Site Locations : � ) �; Remote IVlonitoring Tower � Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 -15- Time Above dB Threshold for Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events ,. i � .. N , : i �. 4 i � �,� �, ii lfid 5 u ar '. i� r , F'� C fi� "� � � i : ,� � � . f � �' � �� . � � �. q ! ��.RMT {? � ; � r � �t, ��T�ii1L' �! T�III@ `! ,T�ITIB�> , T�ii1P. > � � � � � ' .:_f ... ....::� !. ... �..: a65dB ...'�;80dB 4,� at, 90dB.a:. 100dB , ;.: fD f � ..�::..��C�tY.. .. .. ...:. �. .. ::. Address � 1 ..i .... ... � ... . �� L . ... . .....:. ..... . •: 1 Minneapolis Xences Ave. & 41 st St. 15:43:17 00:00:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 15:36:21 00:05:43 00:00:11 00:00:00 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 17:34:46 00:55:43 00:00:08 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 15:41:42 00:18:17 00:00:01 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 18:01:Q6 03:57:47 00:02:22 00:00:00 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 1$:13:38 03:1 �:31 00:05:07 00:00:00 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 00:26:57 00:00:17 00:00:00 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 00:11:58 OO:OQ:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Harfford Ave. 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 00:00:27 00:00:00 00:00:00 OO:OO:QO 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. OO:OQ:29 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:00:44 00:00:01 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 00:10:20 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 31:18:53 00:01:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heights Cullon St. & �exington Ave. 00:56:45 OO:OO:Q5 00:00;00 OQ:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 26:25:51 01:35:43 00:00:10 00:00:00 17 Bioomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. OQ:00:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 1$ Richfieid 75th St. & 17th Ave. 00:43:21 00:00:15 00:00:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 00:35:26 00:00:11 00:00:00 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th Sf. & 3rd Ave. 00:07:03 00:00:06 00:00:02 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 00:25:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 18:22:07 00:00:06 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 04:20:39 00:01:12 00:00:00 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 31:26:49 00:04:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 01:07:24 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 02:23:10 00:00:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 00:08:05 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 28 Richfieid 6645 16th Ave. S. 01:12:06 00:00:52 00:00:00 �0:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 00:01:39 00:00:09 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 05:51:56 00:00:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:00:46 OO:OO:OQ 00:00:00 OO:Q0:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:00:33 00:00:00 OO:OO:OQ 00:00:00 33 Burnsville No�th River Hiils Park 00:02:37 OO:Q0:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 00:09:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 08:16:50 00:00:42 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Appie Vailey Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 13:58:03 00:00:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 00:06:48 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 00:01:04 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charies PI. 00:02:12 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 ':; ;,' `, Total Time' far Ar��val Noise Evenis �' y`1 5'� ,, ..,. ., .. :> . , .�,,..,,�� .. .. .: . . .. . . . .. 2�9 47 28 0 22 1 OQ 08 01 �'QO' 00�00 � - 16 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 ,. � Time Above Threshold dB for Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events May 2006 . � . � V . ::. . "' i l . �� A a �� . . , : ", t ;�. - .. �' � { I RMT � � , Time ? T�me > � �T�me � T�me > + � � �. i i � . i : . : M .. ., . . � k 4: S : � . ::' .ID .... . .,..:�i Ci ;: � �� .. . .: . �. , . . �� Acldress . .. ..... '. . :. . . .. ..:: 65dB,:. ..�.'.. 80dB. .... � 90dB ' ..1:ooag _� tY....,;: .. . , .... _. : .. .. . _ 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. 05:4038 00:06:19 OQ:00:03 00:00:00 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 07:13:56 00:09:48 Q0:00:21 00:00:00 3 Minneapalis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 15:47:36 00:32:23 00:02:45 00:00:00 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 17:20:04 00:43:05 00:01:15 00:00:00 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 53:09:55 05:58:33 00:59:20 00:0�:18 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 60:26:49 08:28:03 01:30:48 00:01:04 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 29:28:52 01:16:56 OQ:03:04 00:00:00 8 Minneapolis �ongfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 16:01:06 00:36:15 00:00:30 00:00:00 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 00:02:57 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. Oq:01:19 00:00:00 OQ:00:00 00:00:00 11 St. Paul Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 00:05:14 00:00:05 00:00:00 00:00:00 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 00:02:33 00:00:00 00:00:00 00:00:00 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 08:31:45 00:05:58 00:00:00 00:00:00 14 Eagan 1 st St. & McKee St. 09:15:05 00:29:20 00:00:58 00:00:00 15 Mendota Heighfs Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 10:14:20 00:10:58 �0:00:03 00:00:00 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 10:30:36 01:01:49 00:07:31 00:00:00 17 Bloomington 84th St. & 4th Ave. 00:20:31 00:00:16 00:00:00 00:00:00 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17fh Ave. 07:20:23 00:01:46 00:04:00 00:00:00 19 Bloomington 16tii Ave. & 84th St. 05:12:3Q 00:02:15 00:00:07 00:00:00 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. Q1:10:32 00:00:37 00:00:03 00:00:00 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 03:54:59 00:01:15 00:40:00 OO:OO:OQ 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 02:51:31 00:00:52 00:00:00 00:00:00 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 19:01:38 01:20:38 00:09:58 00:00:00 24 Eagan Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. 06:49:56 00:09:14 00:00:00 00:00:00 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 04:52:34 00:00:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 05:28:35 00:05:45 Q0:00:00 00:00:00 27 Minneapolis Anthony Schooi 5757 Irving Ave. S. 16:25:29 00:26:38 00:00:20 00:00:00 28 Richfield 6645 9 6th A.ve. S. 31:41:02 00:17:30 00:00:29 04:00:00 29 Minneapolis Ericssan Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 09:59:27 00:05:46 00:00:00 00:00:00 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 13:31:21 01:07:33 00:03:42 OO:OO:OQ 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 00:53:56 00:00:19 00:00:00 00:00:00 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 00:22:29 00:00:35 00:00:00 OO:OO:QO 33 Burnsville North River Hills Park 04:13:57 00:01:33 00:00:00 00:00:00 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 01:54:35 00:00:21 00:00:00 00:00:00 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 02:06:48 00:00:34 00:00:00 00:00:00 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 00:43:24 00:00:10 00:00:00 00:00:00 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 01:31:23 00:00:44 00:00:00 OO:OO:QO 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 02:34:19 00:�1:32 00:00:00 00:00:00 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charies PI. 01:48:41 00:01:23 00:00:00 00:00:00 ��' ;, Tatal T�me for Departure IVoise Evenfs '388 42 45 �3 27 22 03 Q1 17 00 01 22 .,� ..:. ... . ..... ......... . . ........ ,.: ,., . . ..t „ ,. .,. . ...,: :, Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 17 - Arrival Related Noise Events ' � s s � " � � , � '' ' � �� ` �; ' Arnval Arrrval � Arrival, ' ; Arr�val' I.�!n i '. 4! � � 5 5 1 Y Y . I 4 '., F 7� �:: 4 � 4 S{.'� L � J C I I 1. 4 3# � � .� . � RMT , � , � k 4 ;� , � , � , � , 4� ' � Events > ' Events � � EVents > Eve�ts � , , , � � � � , , � �� .:.1D,.. . .:.. .� . �..G�tY��.:.! :..:.�" . r�;..� . _.,::..k. _.. . : Address . ... _ :�3,. .+ ,..:..:'. � '..._�.: f5dB._. }u �� ,'80dBa., '. � . `L90dB ..'..' E � '�1�OOdB...,. '; 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 3726 8 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 3359 96 1 0 3 Minneapolis West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. 3474 782 3 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 3497 310 1 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 3641 2620 52 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 3701 2899 175 0 7 Richfield Weniworth Ave. & 64th St. 70 6 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 37 2 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. 0 0 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 2 0 0 0 11 St. Paui Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. 2 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Riton St. & Rockwood Ave. 3 1 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 39 0 0 0 14 Eagan 1st St. & McKee St. 6801 32 0 0 15 Mendota Heighfs Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. 156 3 d 0 16 Eagan Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane 5010 1135 2 0 17 Bloomingfon 84th St. & 4th Ave. 3 0 0 0 18 Richfield 75th St. & 17th Ave. 204 9 0 0 19 Bloomington 16fh Ave. & 84th St. 95 5 0 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 20 1 1 0 , 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 112 0 Q 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 4097 5 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 1078 12 0 0 24 Eagan Chapei �n. & Wren Ln. 6647 84 0 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 295 0 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 602 9 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony Schooi 5757 Irving Ave. S. 31 2 0 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 215 13 0 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 5 1 1 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 1497 5 0 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 5 0 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. 2 0 0 0 33 Bumsville North River Hills Park 12 0 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 33 0 Q 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet �n. 1944 18 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 2445 6 d � 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 28 0 d 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 7 0 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 11 0 Q 0 �; � � "" � a }Tofial �4rr�va� No�se Events , � � ' � ,' 4' ;� � � 0 � .:.. . .. ...... � ,.,, . , ,,, ,., ,..Y,,,. .. ,... ._.., , ,,,�, . ., ,. � , . 52906 8U6 23fi � ,, �� , -� 8- Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 Departure Related Noise Events May 2006 , , , D �,RMT ....... ....... ,. .,_, _..: �,.. .:,..�.. ` � ,Event u�e E�ent �� 'Euent u>e Ev nt >e , � . . :.� ...� � � �.� t . �D ..� . .�':: '. . . _GitY ..�....:: ... ......::: ........ Address... ......'... . ....:>.. .., 65d6.,.:: . , .80dB.. . _. .90dB� , .. . .::100dB � ;: ... .... . . .. . ..... 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Ave. & 41 st St. 1019 53 1 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1276 101 6 0 3 Minneapolis West Eimwood St. & Belmoni Ave. 2784 224 35 0 4 Minneapolis Park Ave. & 48th St. 2968 348 19 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Ave. & 58th St. 7778 1983 620 8 6 Minneapolis 25th Ave. & 57th St. 9127 3253 683 31 7 Richfield Weniworth Ave. & 64th St. 4600 557 39 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 2679 282 11 0 9 5t. Paul Saratoga St. & Harlford Ave. 13 0 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. 7 0 Q 0 11 St. Paul Finn St. & 5cheffer Ave. 18 1 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. 8 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end af Mohican Court �632 97 0 0 14 Eagan 1 st St. & McKee St. 1523 213 12 0 15 Mendota Heights Guilon St. & Lexington Ave. 1853 115 1 0 16 Eagan Avalpn Ave. & Vilas Lane 1626 324 76 0 17 Bloomington $4th 5t. & 4th Ave. 65 4 0 0 18 Richfield 75th Sf. & 17th Ave. 1413 49 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Ave. & 84th St. 944 33 2 � 0 20 Richfield 75th St. & 3rd Ave. 231 6 1 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Ave. & 67th St. 765 27 0 0 22 In�er Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 501 16 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Ave. 3009 488 120 0 24 Eagan Chapel �n. & Wren Ln. 1156 105 1 0 25 Eagan Moonshine Park 1321 Jurdy Rd. 668 5 0 0 26 Inver Grove Heights 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. 1044 61 0 0 27 Minneapolis Anthony School 5757 Irving Ave. S. 2892 284 6 0 28 Richfield 6645 16th Ave. S. 4972 297 8 0 29 Minneapolis Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. 1789 75 0 0 30 Bloomington 8715 River Ridge Rd. 2074 384 62 0 31 Bloomington 9501 12th Ave. S. 187 2 0 0 32 Bloomington 10325 Pieasant Ave. S. 70 3 Q 0 33 Burnsvilie North River Hiils Park 776 25 0 0 34 Burnsville Red Oak Park 437 7 0 0 35 Eagan 2100 Garnet Ln. 431 10 0 0 36 Apple Valley Briar Oaks & Scout Pond 138 4 0 0 37 Eagan 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 271 21 0 0 38 Eagan 3957 Turquoise Cir. 461 21 0 0 39 Eagan 3477 St. Charles PI. 349 15 0 0 ; , � , � Total "Departure Naise Eve�nts � , ;; 63554 , 9493 1703 ' � 39 . ,:,.,.,. � :... ...... . .....: s ,� Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 19 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#1) Xences Ave. & 41 st St. (RMT Site#2) Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. (RMT Site#3) West Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. - 20 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 Top Ten Loudesfi Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#4) Park Ave. & 48th St. (RMT Site#5) 12th Ave. & 58th St. (RfVi i Site#6) 25th Ave. & 57th St. Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 21 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 � (RMT Site#7) Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. 05/30/2006 23:33 05/30/2006 23:29 05/20/2006 7:40 05/31 /2Q06 7:41 05/10/2006 23:Q7 05/09/2006 17:37 05/24/2006 23:25 05l01 /2006 21:37 05/09/2006 17:10 05/04/2006 17:31 XNA123 CC1705 NWA1212 NWA1212 CC17Q5 NWA1792 CC1705 N WA929 N WA514 AAL422 (RMT Site#8) Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. - 22 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events fior MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#10) Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. (RMT Site#11) Finn St. & Scheffer Ave. (RM i Site#12) Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 23 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for IViSP May 2006 (RMT Site#13) Southeast end of Mohican Court (RMT Site#14) 1 st St. & McKee St. Q5/19/2006 21:59 05/23/2006 7:37 05/01 /2006 16:57 05107/2006 19:00 05/01/2006 10:44 05i22/2006 14:27 05/24/2006 9:29 05/23/2006 19:01 05101 /2006 16:30 05/29/2006 9:30 N WA867 NWA1212 NWA1710 NWA6Q6 N WA508 NWA1427 N WA508 NWA1532 N WA508 (RMT Site#15) Cullon St. & Lexinaton Ave. � • t� � •e . . � •� � • t� • •� � •e � •� � •� � �� 12L 12L 12L 12L 12� 12L 12L 12L 12� 12L � ;. . ;• . :• :• :: � : . � � :. - 24 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 C:. C. _ Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#16) Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane (RMT Site#17) 84th St. & 4th Ave. (RN'iT Site#18) 75th St. & 17th Ave. Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 25 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#19) 16th Ave. & 84th St. (RMT Site#20) 75th St. & 3rd Ave. (RMT Site#21) Barbara Ave. & 67th St. - 26 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 � -; Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Evenfis for MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#22) Anne Marie Trail (RMT Site#23) End of Kenndon Ave. (RMT 5ite#2�) Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Report Generated: 06/09l2006 13:30 - 27 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 05/08/2006 23:31 05/29l2006 20:12 05/19/2006 15:13 Q5/27/2006 9:15 05/19I2006 14:35 05/08/2006 10:38 05/19I2006 15:24 05/27/2006 16:00 05126/2006 21:03 05/19/2006 15:50 FDX1106 N WA975 EJA916 CCP1430 N WA497 NWA1426 NWA19 NWA3 DHL197 N WA1054 (RMT Site#25) Moonshine Park 1321 J C C C Q � 0 Q 0 ❑� (RMT Site#26) 6796 Arkansas Ave. W. (RMT Site#27) - 2$ - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 ("-.��1 Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP (RMT Site#28) 6645 16th Ave. S. (RMT Site#29) Ericsson Elem. School 4315 31 st Ave. S. (RMT Sife#30) Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 29 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 ( , ,. (RMT Site#31) 9501 12th Ave. S. (RMT Site#32) 10325 Pleasant Ave. S. (RMT Site#33) North River Hills Park - 30 - Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 ( Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#34) Red Oak Park (RMT Site#35) 2100 Garnet Ln. (R1�T Sife�#36) Briar Oaks & Scout Pond Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 - 31 - Top Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events for MSP May 2006 (RMT Site#37) 4399 Woodgate Ln. N. 05/21 /2006 6:31 05/08/2006 14:4; 05101 /2006 7:43 05/3112006 14:45 05/19/2006 18:58 05/19/2006 13:24 05i24/2006 10:29 05/19/2006 9:21 05/08/2006 17:43 DHL1648 AAL1442 Unknown N WA640 AAL1442 NWA1674 NWA1672 N WA454 Unknown AAL422 (RMT Site#38) 3957 Turauoise Cir. � '•' � � :. �� : . �� ,�1� :. �� : . �� : . �� 11�� • (RMT Site#39) 3477 St. Charles PI. Mav 2006 Remote Monitoring Tower Top Ten Summary The toP ten noise events and the event ranges at each RMT for May 2006 were comprised of 91.5% departure operations. The predominant top ten aircraft type was the DC9Q with 35.7% of the highest Lmax events. Mav 2006 Technical Advisor Report Notes Unknown �eids are due to unavailability of FAA flight track data. Missing FAA radar data for 0 days during the month of May 2006. - 32 - Report Generafed: 06/09/2006 13:30 __ �_, (. � Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL May 2006 Remote Monitoring Towers ` Date , #1' ; #2 ` #3 �' #4 #5 #6, #7 #8, #9, #10 #1'1 #12 #13 #14� #15 ....:.. . ... . . ... . .. .. ..:...::. �,...�,:. , .._,,. . ,: ,._... . . . ..,..,... 05I01 /2006 60.8 63.1 67.3 63.6 73 72.2 60.2 57 NA NA NA 34.1 57.3 62.5 59.3 05/02/2006 57.5 59.6 63.9 61.5 71.5 71 61.4 57.5 31.1 25.2 NA NA 58.1 67 59:4 05103/2006 54.4 56.2 59 61.1 71.3 73.8 66.6 61.9 47.9 29.5 48.8 38.3 45.1 63.2 46.4 05/04/2006 55.7 56.9 60.7 62.5 73.3 74.6 68.5 62.7 35.4 37 NA NA 45.6 64.6 50.3 05/Q5/2006 56.7 57.4 60.4 62.7 71.3 73.8 66.6 61.4 30.9 34.1 NA 36.7 36.2 61.5 39.8 05/06/2006 55.1 56.9 60.5 59.3 69 72.6 59.9 60.6 25.5 33.3 NA 34.5 48.7 60.6 49.8 05/07/2Q06 58.9 59.8 65.1 60.2 68.8 67.1 31.3 NA 26.2 NA 27.9 29.2 59.3 64.3 59.8 05/08/2006 61.7 63.3 67.4 62.9 71.4 69.8 48 37.3 NA 40.5 35 41.6 58.7 62.5 60 05/0912006 57.1 59.7 63.6 63 72.9 74.4 66.3 61 30.6 NA NA � NA 55 64.3 54.8 05/10/2006 55.9 55.8 61.3 61.3 72.3 75.3 67.1 63.8 NA 44.1 30.1 38.3 37.7 62.5 44.1 Q5/1112006 55.1 57.5 61.2 62.4 73.4 75.3 68.3 63.8 31.7 35.6 NA 29.2 31.9 62.7 45.5 05/12/2006 53.7 54.2 59.1 60.3 71.8 75.1 68.8 60.1 NA 32.9 41.5 35.9 30.2 63.6 41.1 05/13/2006 54 56.7 61.6 64.2 70.7 73.8 64.8 60.7 27 NA 31.2 31.4 NA 61.2 NA 05/14/2006 53.9 56.2 60.2 61.7 71.2 73.2 67 60 29.8 35.3 30.3 NA NA 60.5 37.5 a5/15/2006 54:1 -57:2 61:8 62:9- 73.7 75:4 68.4 61.1 39.5 28::5 38:7 -45:6- 35:8- 60:5 41.5 05/16/2006 56.4 58.8 62.2 63.1 72.6 772 68.9 63.4 39.3 41.4 40.6 40.2 28.8 61.2 45.4 05l1 �/2006 55.8 55.9 60.7 62.6 73.7 75.7 68.4 63.6 28.8 40.4 38.6 38.5 50.1 61.3 46.1 05/18/2006 53.8 55 60.8 61.3 72.5 75.4 68.5 62.6 41.6 NA 46.1 26.2 36.5 60.9 50.4 05/19/2006 61.7 63.7 66.1 65.5 70.9 69.8 48 52.1 44.9 NA NA NA 58.9 67.1 59.7 05/20/2006 54.1 54 61.4 58.6 70.6 71.8 63.3 61 24.6 26.5 34.5 33.1 35.4 60.4 37.3 05i21/2006 55.4 58.3 61.3 58.8 67.5 67.5 60.7 53.8 39.6 25.8 32,6 30.4 56.4 62.7 57.9 05/22/2006 58.2 60.6 64.3 61.1 68.5 68.4 42.7 34.4 27.9 34.9 37 36.2 58 65.2 60 05/2312Q06 60.2 62.3 66.6 63.5 70.1 69.5 36.1 34.4 39.9 27 NA 39.5 61.7 64 63.7 05124/2006 60.3 63.1 65.5 65.6 73.9 76.7 63.4 61.2 46.4 32.8 40.5 45.9 57.3 66.1 59.5 05/25/2006 56.7 59 62.2 66.7 73.6 77.1 68.3 63.1 36.7 34.1 NA 26.5 36.1 62.7 51.6 0512612006 55.2 57.5 63.4 622 74.1 72.3 61.8 61 31.5 37.1 41 31.4 54 65.3 55.5 05/27/2006 59 60.7 65.9 61.7 69.7 67.6 36 37.9 34.6 NA NA NA 57.6 61.2 58.1 05/28/2006 57.7 58.6 65 60.2 69 66.6 40.4 33.4 30.7 31.9 NA 40 56 NA 57.5 05/29/2006 582 59 64.3 61.1 69.3 72 55.7 54.2 35.4 30 31.9 36.8 57.1 NA 55.3 05/30/2006 56.2 56.9 62 62 72.4 76 65.7 65.6 40.5 37.9 43.6 NA NA 56.8 37.4 05/31/2006 57.3 59.4 62.7 642 73 75 63.7 62.3 36.8 36.3 25.8 NA 53.6 60.9 52.7 � Mo DNL ;` 5� 5 59 3 63 5 62 6 71 9 73 7 65 1 6d 6 38 7 35 5 38 6 37 4 54 7 63 2 561,, ,.:- .,, , „ . ., : - .. . .. ,.:., ;, . . ..., . � Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:30 -33- Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL May 2006 Remote Monitoring Towers �. hi` Date'� #16` �#17' #18� ,#19� #20 #21 #22 #23 #24� �#25 #26' �#27 #28 #29;' _. .�,< :. ......... .. .rta., ,. :. , .w::, ._r.,.. .. .�.,. ,. ,.<, .�;,,. ., ,.� .,, ,,, . . .., � < � ,,. „ � ._„ A . .,.,.,. , ,.. ��„ ...,,,,. . .. , ,,.., " 05/01 /2006 66.6 42.7 54.6 53 44.5 52.6 54.8 66.9 59.6 49.1 54.2 60.8 60.7 52.3 05/Q2/2006 69.6 51.6 50.4 50.9 47.3 56 61 67.1 64.5 54.6 59.5 64 60.1 55 05/03/2006 67.8 55 51.1 56.3 59.7 42.9 59.9 54.5 62.7 43.6 54 702 62.9 60.4 05/04/2006 68.2 55 46.7 40.9 59.5 41.1 60.4 59.9 64 46.4 52.9 60.7 63.5 58.8 05/05/2006 67.2 46 47.1 50.1 45.7 35.9 59.7 48 62.1 42.2 49.6 59.7 61.7 59.3 Q5/06/2006 65.5 46.2 54.4 50.8 49.8 49.2 56.9 57.4 59.9 44.1 52.1 57.8 55.6 55.3 05/07/2006 65.5 26.5 54.6 57 37.5 56.6 56.4 682 60.9 51.7 57.8 NA 53.1 NA 05/Q8/2006 66.7 50.3 62.9 66.2 37.8 56.1 51.2 67.8 57.1 57.9 58 39.5 65.2 34.5 05/09/2006 68.3 44.4 53.5 48.6 49.4 50.3 59.4 62.7 62.1 50.3 49.8 61.3 62.1 56.4 05/10/2006 66.9 44.9 40.9 41 45.8 46.7 59.2 53.6 62.4 35.7 50.8 61.5 61.2 58.8 Q5I11/2006 66.4 38.5 50.6 28.3 51.6 45.5 60.6 54.3 63 51.6 50.5 61.1 64.8 58.1 05/12/2006 67.8 39.5 43.9 34.1 49.8 28.4 61.3 52.3 64 44 49.5 59.4 63.8 55.9 05/13/2q06 66.9 NA 47.$ 40 40.5 39.1 58.6 46.2 61.2 37.7 43.4 57.7 62.1 53.1 05/14/2Q06 64.7 32.7 48.1 44.1 44.1 40.5 58.5 47.2 60.5 46 48.4 592 62.1 52.4 05/15/2006 65.9 36.9 49.3 32 47.8 41.8 58 47.9 60.1 4$.5 39.4 60.5 64.4 54.8 05/16/2006 65.4 42.5 52.1 40.4 50.9 42 57.8 54.3 61.2 47 492 60.7 62.1 5$.6 05/17/2006 64.9 25.1 45.3 42.7 37.4 45.8 57.8 56.3 60.9 47.8 51 63.4 61.9 59.8 05/18/2006 65.3 NA 43.1 46.7 47 38.4 56.9 53.7 60.3 40.8 46.3 61 62 59.1 05/19/2006 68.6 34.4 55.6 53.5 38.1 55.5 58.6 66.8 62.9 58.1 59 43.3 58.9 49.8 05/20/2006 65.1 29.4 42 41.9 37.4 46.3 56.7 51.8 59.6 3$.8 47.9 57.6 58.8 58.5 05/21/2006 65.1 NA 55.8 54.2 26.1 53.6 55.1 66.3 60.3 49.7 56.5 54 57.1 53 05/22i2006 672 NA 54.1 53.5 36.9 54.2 56.9 67.4 62.1 54.5 59 40.3 60.5 NA 05/23/2006 66.6 31.5 55 51 43.9 56.9 57.1 70.2 61.4 55.2 60.8 41.6 54.9 39.1 Q5124/2006 66.1 43.1 51.8 49.6 43.6 52.5 57.6 65.9 622 52.3 56 61.2 57.9 51 05J25/2006 67.7 42.3 44.5 43.7 40.8 44.4 60.1 55.8 62.5 46.6 48.3 61.5 62.6 55.6 05/26/2006 69.4 36.2 39.7 45.6 42.3 52.7 60.6 63.9 63.1 52.8 59.2 64.2 61.1 52.9 05/27/2006 64.2 NA 54.2 50.9 24.7 51.3 52.8 64.2 57.5 51.7 55.5 NA 56.6 36.1 05/28/2006 62.9 32.3 52.7 47.6 37 52.1 51.8 65.8 58.2 50.4 58.6 37.3 51.6 NA 05/29/2006 63.6 NA 51.9 47.7 NA 54.9 52.4 63.6 58 49.1 57.1 51.1 52.5 50 05/30/2006 67.3 29.4 44 44.9 46.5 42.8 54.2 44.9 58.4 47.1 47 63.5 60.9 53.5 05/31/2006 64.4 30.2 52 49.8 422 49.5 55.8 60.7 59.9 48.3 54.6 63.4 60.1 50.5 ' Mo; DINL ' 66 7�45 6, 53 a3 7 49'6 '51 5 58 1`63 5 61"5 L51'1�� 55 2 61'°1' 61 2',55 5 � �, �. �, � .,�. ,�, - 34 - Report Generafed: 06/09/2006 13:30 Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events DNL May 2006 ! Remote Manitoring Towers Date #30 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35 #36 #37 #38 #.39 .:... , . �, ,,. .� , . .��. .., , _.,,.,.: . . . .::: . . . .. .: ... . .. .. ��. . , . ,, . .... .. .. . . . ........ 05/01/2Q06 63.9 46.6 38.7 53.9 47.6 49.8 48 46 47.8 48.9 05/02/2006 58.9 46.5 NA 49.2 45 49.3 52 44 46.3 50.6 05/03/2006 54.5 39.5 38.7 37.4 35.7 53 55.3 38.6 49.5 49.9 05/04i2006 51.8 47.2 54.8 41.1 42.5 54.7 56.6 NA 272 NA 05(05/2Q06 50.2 50.4 41.2 NA 33.4 52.2 56.8 NA NA NA 05/06/2006 60.7 45 40.6 49.5 49.5 50.3 49 47.4 38.8 44.7 05/07/2006 63.2 39.7 NA 52.9 48.9 48.9 44.1 47.9 49.4 48..3 05/08/2006 69.7 60.9 59.8 552 52.5 55.8 54.2 54.3 55.5 57.6 05/09/2006 58.3 492 45.8 30.6 32.9 53 54.8 53.8 50 44.4 05/1012006 53 44.9 45.7 39.8 27.7 53.7 56.5 37 NA NA 05/11/2006 51.6 25.9 NA 37.5 38.8 53.8 56.6 41.4 NA 27.6 05/12i2006 51.1 36.3 32.2 NA NA 48.5 52.9 NA NA NA 05/13/2006 48.6 32.3 28.6 34.5 NA 50.4 52.6 37.6 NA NA 05/14/2006 51.4 26.8 45 NA 31.6 50.6 54 42.3 NA NA 05/45/2006 49:6 27.2 40.6 25.9 46.1 50.9 54.5 48.4 NA 35.4 05/16/2006 51.5 37.8 44.6 30.1 40.6 52.1 55.3 43.1 30.7 32.5 05/17/2Q06 51.5 36.8 NA 32.6 28.6 53 56 44.5 35.7 �4.9 05/18/2006 50.6 NA NA 37.9 39.4 51.3 54.9 43.6 38.9 45:6 05/19/2006 64.9 49.3 32.6 53.6 48 48.1 52.2 50 52.6 48.6 05/20/2006 49.5 27.1 41.7 NA 25.3 51.8 54.6 40.5 37.1 41 05/21/2006 64 37.4 NA 51.8 47.9 50.5 42.6 53.9 59 51 05/2212006 62.6 39.4 NA 52.5 48.7 48.5 41.6 48.7 50.2 48.8 05/23/2006 61.1 35.4 NA 51.9 46.8 46.9 39.5 49 50.9 51 05/2412006 62.3 45.2 47 51.8 49 51.2 49.5 48.3 48.7 49.8 05/25/2006 49.6 32.6 45.2 33.7 44.8 51.1 54.6 34.9 NA NA 05/26/2006 52.6 37.2 NA 422 39.1 52.2 53.3 38.5 36.9 40 05/27/2006 62.9 41.1 NA 50.7 42.5 46.9 39.7 46.5 49.8 46 05/28/2006 58.5 35.6 35.3 47.6 40.7 40.5 38.2 43.4 46.8 46.2 05/29I2006 60.7 39.3 NA 50.4 47.5 46.3 40.6 44.5 45.4 46.6 05/30/2006 48.4 NA 39.2 NA NA 50.5 54.4 NA NA NA 05/31 /2006 61.2 34.7 NA 49 44.6 50.7 512 49.7 50.7 43.9 IVIo DNL 60 4 47 7 47 ; 48 6 45 1 51 3 53 2 47 3 48 8 47 5' Report Generated: 06/09/2006 13:3d -35- r , �� , � � � �� T � , �' � , • •. � �- �- � � - � =1- �. � _ _ _ , .. : , 1 11 • , Metropolitan Airports Commission 3804 Carrier Jets 13eparted IZunways 12L and 12R in 1Viay 2006 3671 (96.5%) of those Operations Remained in the Corridor 3804 Total 12L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations 3671(96.5%) Tota112L & 12R Carrier Departure Operations in the Corridor Minneapolis-St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate In Corridor 05/01/2006 00:00:00 - 06/01/2006 00:00:00 367'1 Tracks Crossed Gate: �eft = 1810 (49.3%), Right =1861 (50.7%) � 6000 m d v 5000 c 0 � 4000 d W 3000 � 0 �- 2000 'a ; �000 0 .Q a a .........................................................:.................. ..................:...................:.. ........ �j...;.................. t� r� c� � c`� „�-, : �� . . . ... ... .. .� .............�e -2 -1 0 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) -��- Arrival � Departure ❑ Overtlight � .� �� :� ��..,.��..� .�.,��.,. � ,��:�:.� �.., _ .. ., ......, . ..... .. . ....:.... . . -..�_ Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Depariure Corridor Analysis l�. Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Co�runission 5� (1.��0) Ilunway 12L and 12I2 Carxie� Jet I)eparture i�perations were North of the 090° Corridor Boundar�y I)uring l�Iay 2006 ( � - Page 2 Minneapolis-St. Paul Penetration Gate Plot for Gate iVorth Corridor 05/01/2006 00:00:00 - 06/01/2006 00:00:00 58 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 8(13.8%), Right = 50 (86.2%) .� 6000 . . d . . . � . . . v 5000 ..................:...................:..................:. ................. c : : : o � � � a4000 ..................:...................:..................:.�._,............... � : : : d : : : — .................:. . . W 3000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . : . . �.,. . . . . . . . . . . .............. � . : �.,� �;��,�`; r; � �- Z000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . _. . ;�,,. �,. �; . . �:;.. . . ~� y�;.��:� ��;:�-?;� . . . . . . . . . . . .�;�- � ' � �'iJ (..% .. �K� ' LI % Q . �...1` ('� �.J..l �.i, �. : y 1000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.,. . .:. . . . . . .v . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,� . . o : • .sY . . . a o -2 (Runway End) -'- Arrival � -1 0 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) (Corridor End) �,�..w � � .�;:��, ��.�.. � : � n.�.• , .�S' �a.�;o.w a .k .,. .... ...... ;ri.. _ . . .. ..... ... .. . . .,.. , �=' Departure ❑ Overflight� Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Depariure Corridor Analysis r Metropolitan Airports Coirunission 75 (2.0%) Runway 12I� and 12I�. Carrier .Tet Departure Operations were � South of the Corridor (South of 30L I.,ocalizer) During May 2006 Minneapolis—Sf. Paul ' Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South Corridor 05/01/2006 00:00:00 — 06/01/2006 00:00:00 75 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 52 (69.3%), Right = 23 (30.7%) .� 6000 m m y 5000 c 0 a 4000 > m W 3000 � °- 2000 Q 0 1000 .a d p F..................:...................:..................:..................� ........................................................ ....� ............:. . . r,- C� � : � 'I`� ..;�� ..�...... �� .....�, ..................:................. - Jr�.... . . �� C� : � U • -�irfv'�� {';, ,• • � ..................- • � • �! � - �-*'. .`.'� C�'� . : "�� . . . . . � � C r} � n - � . � L (•S�t...._. �. �.. � ........... ..... .. : . � � —2 —1 0 1 2 (Corridor End) Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) �RWY Mid-Poin -�- Arrival �� Departure ❑ Overflight , :,. . �.�.,��,.�.�,�,�-;��-��,; .� : . . . .:. ...:.:. : .:...: ,,. � , Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Depariure Comdor Analysis Page 3 ,' � Metropolitan Airports Coirunission 32 (0.�%) �2.unway 12I, and 12�Z C�rr�er Jet Depa�iure Ope�ations were 5° South of the Corridor (5° South of 30I, I.localize�) During li�ay 2006 �� Page 4 Minneapolis—St. Paui Penetration Gate Plot for Gate South Corridor_5deg 05/01/2006 00:00:00 — 06101/2006 00:00:00 14 Tracks Crossed Gate: Left = 11 (78.6%), Right = 3(21.4%) � 6000 : : : � . . . v' 5000 ..................:...................:..................:.................. c � : : o • � • i4000 ..................:...................:..................:.................. y : : : d : : : � 3000 ..................:...................:..................:. . ; � � °- 2000 �� . . . t:?. . . . . . . . . .• . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .�. . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . a : �? i r� : c�3 : : ,-• °' 1000 C:. . . ,--,, ...� 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .:. . . . . . . . . . ::). . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........... o : � t7 : .a : � : Q n —2 (Corridor End) -�- Arrival —1 0 1 2 Deviation From Center of Gate (Miles) �RWY Mid-Poin �-' Departure � Overflight Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Deparlure Corridor Analysis Metropolitan Aiiports Commission Top 15 Runway 12I� and 1212 Departure Destinations for lVYay 2006 �. , � C� Monthly Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Analysis Page 5 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � July 6, 2006 TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: James E. Danielson, City Administrator SUBJECT: Meeting Notes DISCUSSION: Attached are the meeting notes from the joint meeting with the Eagan ARC and a copy ofi the letter to their legislators. Please review for comments, or action. i i � ` S � � ��t' � NOTES � -�� EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION b�� (,L' , � � JOINT MEETING WITH THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT RELATIONS 5 �� ` COMMISSION � q�3. r'iti�° t{j't�� i �� TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2006 '7:30 P.M. o ��«�� l��Y �" EAGAN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS ��G A joint workshop of the Eagan Ailport Relations Comtnission and the Mendota n'�' i Heights Airport Relations Comrnission was held on May 9, 2006 in the Eagan City Counci �� •_�' Chambers. Both Comrnissions introduced themselves. '"UN"� •�,,, . � �v' �► � � Eagan/Mendota Height Corridor: � � � �0 5 , � - � • Eagan — Operation compliance at 94-95%; should be higher � = Mendota Hezghts — Most of noise com�laints �re from residents no�j of �^ _.._._. ----. ...._._ _� _ _...__ . ___ _ / -regional jets-biggesi problem- - Ni��ltii3lZ� ��ciaflOilS: � Mendoia Heights —Number of nighttime operations are double fiom� general operations for entire auport are down. Chad Leqve stated he the NOC agenda in. an upcoming month Re�resentation on Metropolitan Airpoi-ts Commission: Hig way 110; �ryr .� ��` �� . S� � i. year; w e �� j put this i em � \ � � Eagan — The City of Eagan is asking for a permanent or at-large seat to the Metropolitan Airports Commission or an at-large community seat representing the cities of Eagan, Bloomington, Burnsville, Richfield and Mendota Heights; communities touched by 65 DNL. • Eagan — Letter was sent to Eagan's legislative delegation three months ago asking for feedback and Eagan has received no response to letter. s Mendota Heights — Would like copy of letter fihe City of Eagan sent to legislative delegation • Mendota Heights' Representative — Tom Foley • Eagan's Representative — Bert McKasy • Mendoia Heights — Has had iheir MAC representative attend and speak at an ARC meeting • Mendota Heights — Lobby for 20/20 P�an; concerned about one camer at the main airport �., � „ � :,, �,, �,. � ; �i � � t'�,�y. � � i!i�'wf,�,�'; ��',. ��'::,��.-� ;, • ' r , '...� ,� '�.,:h �'. ��... �' �r,: . `1' u }.; Y�' M� � Iriipact �of 2�'ew Runwa� ,� �,. ,Eagan is number one in complaints V�e.f ��agan F; New runway has not yet been utilized to fullest extent •:` Eagan - Tli�° Eagan City Council has approved Phase II of the Noise Study which will be '"`� �:;�. oonducted the secohd and third weel�s of June 2006 to analyze the impact of the new %unwa�y�� o� s IvTendota Heights"—.�Th�cy were supposed to see relief frorn the new runway, but have not because�'t�1e parallel runway continue to be used as the preferential runways. Co�g Skills: ')�! s Mendota Heights — The City of Mendota Heights, along with their ARC, made a brochure `, �''i. n ,.; ' z: ti.._ for residents with information on airport noise and includes AR.0 Commission members •``-�.i ; �� "' jy ' � ,home telephone numbers � , ,�`, �/ �'�1Vler�dota Heights — Mendota Heights put together a 17 minute video "Why Can't They �; �, ,, Stop� t�e �oise? It s a general video and includes information on sound-proofing, fleet � C;. s;.� � m1,x; �ey run it on cable TV and it can also be signed out from City Hall. �`'� Eagan — Miller requested a capy of the video to show at Eagan's next AR.0 meeting ... i. , �; ,. �, �1 ��;!.'i � .. _ , � �� . �,:��J � � j-,�, " ` � a : .� 'Adjom,med at 8:50 p.m. , �'�� x . � � �,,-. ,, `` y,,��, Z �`, �l.•'`. f,` A,ta ! 4\: • '� r l�. _ . . '� � � t` �� ,i ! si." ,y. March 16, 2006 Representative Tim Wilkin 551 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Eagan Legislafiive Delegation: As a community impacied by three runways at MSP Internationa.l Airport, it is extremely important that the City of Eagan be well represented on the Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC). In order to receive the representation the communiry deserves, the Eagan City Council, at the recomm.endation of the Eagan Auport Relations Commission, would like io get your input and position on two proposed options for changes in how the Cify's representation on the MAC is determisied. . As you well know, with the opening of Runway 17/35 in October of 2005 and with the existing operations off of the parallel nuiways over northeast Eagan, the entire City is uow impacted by __ ___ _airpori noise= to -var-y_ing-_exients=--Moreover, as-the- home to-Northvvest- Airlines - Mesaba-- and - - - --__ _ ___ ------�------� _ - _ _ numerous transportation companies that utilize MSP, the aviation industry and the success of � � MSP is critical to our community. Given both the noise over the community and the value -' placed on the aviation industry, the City of Eagan's representation on ihe•MAC is of uhnost irnportance to our community. Under current State law, the MAC Comtnissioners are appointed by the Governor, with the exception of the Coinmissioners serving the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, who are appointed by their communities' respective Mayors. The City of Eagan is currently represented i��r tyce?'i' MCl��Sv� �rnpgP riictrici coveTs aLrnosT �� oT �?koia �ot?niy, r�r►g??g T?'4m �he �?iy oi Eagan ira the north to Sciota Township in the south (see attached map). It has been the City's experience that the posiiions of our representative on the MAC oftentimes do not reflect the positions of the City of Eagan, particularly as it relates to noise abatement and mitigation. Furthermore, as an appointee by the Governor, our representative rarely, if ever, contacts the City for input on any given decision being brought before the MAC. Given the lack of representation that the City is currently receiving on the MAC, the City is proposing one of two options for changes on the MAC, both of which would require Legislative action. For this reason, the City is seeking your feedback on the proposed changes. Option #1 Like the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, the City of Eagan is greatly impacted by MSP Airport and would request a permanent seat on th.e MAC to be appointed by the Eagan City Council. City of Eagan / MAC Representation March 16, 2006 Page 2 Option #2 In addition to Minneapolis and St. Paul having their own seats on the MAC, there are also MAC Cominissioners who represent greater Minnesota, including representatives from Duluth and St. Cloud. It seems logical that if greater Minnesota and the core cities have representation on the MAC, so too should the communities most impacted by the airport's operations. There are four communities that encompass ihe 65 DNL noise contours that do not currently have their own representa.tion on the MA.C—Eagan., Sloomington, Richfield, and Mendota Heights. It is suggested that at an-large seat either be reassigned to represent the cities in the 65 DNL contour or an at-large seat be added to the MAC in order to allow these four communities, on a rotating basis, to have a single representative on the MA.C. • Lastly, as a request for consideration, given the population shifts and impact of the airport on certain commu.nities, there is a definite need to adjust the cuzrent MAC disiricts. The City understands thai the districting for the MAC coincides with the Metropolitan Council disfiricts; however, iumpact of the airport, both positively and negatively, should be a consideration when - - det�ining-representation on the-Mf�C: -Clearly-Eagan� is-impaeied-far greater and- differently by the operations at MSP than Sciota Township in southern Dakota Couniy is, yet, our communities have ihe same representation. The MAC disiricts need to beiter reflect populat{ _ concentrations and the impact of MSP, and thus redistricting should be stxongly considered. As representatives of the City of Eagan, you know how im.portant it is that the City's interests and positions be heard on the MAC so that the needs of the aviaiion industry are balanced with the needs of our residents' quality of life. Therefore, if you could please share with the City your feedback to the two options set forth in this letter, andJor any input you have pertaining to our representation on the NiAC, it wouid be greatiy appreciaied. �.Jpon hearing from each oz you, the City will then determine whether to seek the introduction of legislation during this session to address the issue of Eagan's representation on the MAC. Thank you in advance for your consideration of the Ciiy's proposal. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me or City Administrator Hedges at (651)675-5001. T look forward to hearing from you very soon, and wish you the best as you begin this legislative session. Sincerely, Pat Geagan Mayor cc: Eagan City Council ( City of Eagan / MAC Representation March 16, 2006 Page 3 State Senator Metzen State Senator McGinn Representative Wardlow Representative Hansen Governor Tim Pawlenty _ _ _ _. __ _ _ _ __ . ._ _ CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS �I�iL�uL�7 July 5, 2006 TO: ARC Commissioners FROM: Linda Shipton, Senior Secretary SUBJECT: Updates for Introduction Packet Please replace the following pages in your ARC Introduction Packet _ Table..of_C_ontents-- _ _ _ ___ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ . Operations North of the 090° Corridor Boundary � � The following should be replaced from your monthly ARC Meeting Agenda Packet. # 7 Airport Noise Report — Put the latest issue of this in your Intro Packet #13 May 2006 - Technical Advisors Report #14 May 2006 - Eagan Mendota Heights Corridor Report ; ( l C, \ C Section l. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16: 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. •: � � . Glossary Historical Review Eagan-MH Corridor Creation of ARC Ordinance No. 290 AR.0 Brochure 2006 Airport Noise Plan of Action Airport Noise Report, June 28, 2006 NOC Bylaws P&E Committee Regular Monthly Meeting Minutes MA.0 Approved 2005 Capital Improvement Program What's New at the MAC Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs ANOMS Monthly Reports May 2006 Technical Advisor's Report May 2006 Eagan Mendota Heights Corridor Report Frequently Asked Questions Contract Pertaining to Limits on Construction of a TYzird Parallel-Ruriway Crossing in the Corridor Aninneapolis Tower �perational (�rder Runway Use Nighttime Voluntary Noise Agreements Maps ARC DVD C � � _. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS '� • Airport Relations Commission Linda Shipton, Senior Secretary July 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Operations North of the 090° Corridar Boundary The following is a tabulation of tracks crossed gate from June 2002 to May 2006 (tracking sheets attached). 2002, June - 137 Tracks Crossed Gate 2002 July - 85 " 2002 August - 176 " 2002 Sept. - 111 " 2002 Oct. - N/A " 2002 Nov. - N/A " 2002 Dec. - iV/A " � 2003 Jan. - 33 � 2003 Feb. - 42 2003 March - 64 2p03 April - 103 2003 May - 45 2003 June - 80 2003 July - 80 2C��3 ;�:�!g. - 35 2003 Sept. - 45 2003 Oct. - 29 2003 Nov - 52 2003 Dec. - 94 ( ' ; 2004 Jan. - 84 2004 Feb. - 129 2004 Mar. - 100 2004 Apr. - 54 2004 May - 204 2004 June - 50 2004 July - 93 2004 August - 117 2004 Sept. - 174 2004 October - 180 2004 November —108 2004 December — 135 2005 January - 169 2005 February — 113 2005 March — 79 2005 Aprii — 175 2005 May - 189 2005 June - 156 2005 July - 103 2005 August — 61 2005 September — 175 2005 October - 100 2005 November — 81 2005 December — 60 2006 January — 118 2006 February — 39 2006 March — 79 2006 April — 121 2006 May - 58 Tracks Crossed Gate « « » « « « « « « « « « « « « C� � �. ITEM 2 , � }' � � � 1' TO: MSP Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) FROM: Chad E. Leqve, Manager — Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs SUBJECT: UPDATE ON RUNWAY 17 190-DEGREE DEPARTURE HEADING DATE: July 5, 2006 At the May 17, 2006 Noise Oversight Committee (NOC) meeting extensive discussion focused on the FAA's use of the 190-degree westbound departure heading ofF Runway 17 when the airport is in a southeast operational configuration (arriving and departing Runways 12L &12R). Following the Committee discussion, which included consideration of a May 15, 2006 letter from Carl Rydeen, MSP Tower Manager, and testimony from the City of Burnsville, the NOC voted unanimously to forward a letter to the FAA requesting answers to the questions raised by the City of Burnsville. Pursuant to the Committee action, on May 19, 2006 a letter from Co-Chairs Kathleen Nelson and Vern Wilcox was sent to the FAA (see Attachment 1). Following the May 19th NOC letter, on June 6, 2006 State Representative Tim Wilkin and State Senator Mike McGinn sent a similar letter to the FAA regarding the FAA's use of the 190-degree departure heading off Runway 17 (see Attachment 2). �' � More recently, a letter was received on June 12, 2006 (dated June 2, 2006) from Ms. Annette Davis, FAA Great Lakes Region Acting Manager — Airspace and Procedures Branch, that responded to the N�y 19th NOC letter (see Attachment 3). As referenced in Ms. Davis's letter, on June 19, 2006 the FAA commenced use of a 200-degree departure heading off Runway 17 when the airport is in a southeast operational configuration for a study period of one month. At the July 19, 2006 NOC meeting Mr. Carl Rydeen, MSP Tower Manager, will be present to address the Committee regarding the FAA's position on this topic and the technical considerations related to airspace use/design and departures off Runway 17 at MSP. C C_ � C � � � I°�T�I�E �l�:�I�SIG:1E�'T' ��1�NI�`�']C�� (I�� Mi�xneapolis/St. :Paul :Inierr�ational Airpv�-t (li�S�`) 604U ••• 2$`�' �1,venoe Soath — Minneapotis, MN 5545Q-279'3 o , PHone{612)725-6455 e r° ° �, c °s'cur co,r,�'t May 19, 2QC�6 Minneapolis Airport FAI� ATGT A�n: Mr. Cari Rydeen Nlanager �- MSP Air Tra�€ic Contraf T�w�r 63't 1 34th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 �E: Use of t�e 19�-�tegree �7epari�t'e Weadir�g off Runw��'fi at Minneap+�lis- St. Pac�l int�rr�ational Airpa�rt (MSP) Dear Mr. �'2ydeer�, Thar►k yau fc�r yaur IU��y 'i 5, �OOfi lei#er detail�ng �AA's inues#igations inta fihe use af tf�e 'f �Q�degree departure �eading aff Runway � 7 during sc�utheas� operationa[ flaws at �_� Min�t�apcaiis-�t. Paut I�t%ma�ic�n�l Airp€�rt {M5P}. As w� knc��r you are a�rar�, fiF�is to�ic was a dis�ussian item at the May ��i, 2i}Q6 MS�' iVoise �JversIr�ht Gommi�#ee (NC�C} meetir�g ancf �on+c�ms still e�cist in the cor€fext c�f a 2UOrdec�ree heaciing. C�y way of backgrr�c�r�d, it is Nt3C's b�#�ef tha� fihe pla€�nirtg process and the cctnsu{��tion and caor+dir�aiion that w�nt into i}�e t�evelopmer�� of F�unway 'I7/35 afi MSP has 6een extensive. This plar�ning pracess acihered �ca FAA c�uidanr.,� �nder t�e provisions of FAA t�rder v0�0.4 and FAA �rde�- 1050.'�. It was thrQugh ��is prc�cess that documents sucl� as �he May 1998 MSP Dual�Track Airpart Planr��ng Pracess Final �nuirc�nmental Impact Statement �hereafter ref�rced to as the Du�!-Track ��1�}, the July 2(iO3 �n�ironrr�ental Ass�ssmen# {EA} far a Repar�ure Prracedure {QPj off �tunway 17 {hereai�er refier�ed ta as the Runway � 7[3P EA) and the �avember 2t�04 M5P 14 C.F.R. Part �15Q Upd�#e wer� cteveloped. The mosi re�ent FAA dc�c�mentation relat�d ta the c�peratic►n of Runway 17135 at MSP was an August 27, 20Q3 F'sndir�g c�f Nc� Sigr€ificant Impact (Ft�NSi}fRe�rd of Decisian (Rd�3� issued by the FAA �pproving the .�uiy 2003 Runvrray � 7 Dp EA. The ca�iyst for iE�e �A was FAA's positian that an air iraffic con#roE pracedure change nv� anticipa�ed in the Dual-Track FEIS, which rc�uiir�eiy rc�uted �ir iraffic over noise sensitive areas �i iess tha� 3,�Q0 feet AG�., r�quired ar� evaivatia� con�ister�t with FA�1 t�rder 105�1.1, lt was understood in ths ptar€nir�c� prac�ss far Runway 17135 th�t cert�ir� operatir�nat intercleper�dences exis� vsrith the paraltel runways �t MSP. Speci�cally, v�rhen t�€e op�ration�l ftow at MSP is irt a southeast canfic�ura#ian w'rth arrival anci depa�ure c�perattons on Runways 12R and 12L, west��und departure operatic�rrs �ff Runv�+ay �7 hav� a westerty headir�g restrictian. It wa� do�umentect t�rat tt�is provisian was ta de- cor�flict R€�nvrray 17 dep�rturc;s from arcivals 4n �tunways 12�. anc� '�2R. May 19. 2d06 Mr. Ryde�n Page 2 in t�e IVt�y 1998 Duai-Track F`��5, the Jt�ly 2t}Ci3 Runway 1� DP EA a�d the November 2Q04 Itt1SP Park 150 Upciaie, p�r �AA input, th�s was assumed �a iranslate in#o a 230- de�ree extent �iM1tM Ffig�t Trac�c L over ihe Il�innesota River VatEey) fc�r vvestbound Rt►nway 17 departure opera�ions when �he aErpat� is irt a so�.r�heast �1ow.1 Howev�r, �aliowing #he oper�ing o€ Runway 1713� ai fttiSP, it v�tas learned th�fi the FaA. had �n�lized the 2�irspace desigr� around MSP in August 2ti0� artd determined the furthest ext�nt af wesibound deparkure headings aff Ru�way 17 wauEd be 19t� degree� when ftunways �2R and � 2L were being used far arrival �peratians. It is aur u�der��anding t�tat tf�is procedural c�ar�g� was imptementec� for the �oClowing tvucr reasons: �t. A�rcraft that are k�eing cfirected by Ai€` Tr�ffic Controf to t�nd on Runways 'I�L ar 1�R �egin a de�cent wi�en they cross the 190�degree tr�ck off Runway � 7. Keeping Runway 't 7 c#e�arture �ircr�ft at ar e�s� a� the � 90-clegree he�ding a�laws tl�e arriving air�r�ft ta desce�d fac l�nding wl�ile en�uring they arc� separated fram aircraft that are departinc� Runway 17. 2. Ther� is a carridor of airspac� just to the wes� af �he 19U-dec�ree �r�ck ti�a� allaws Air TrafFic Cc�n�rc�l to transitio€� nonWMSP a�rcraft north and sauth of the airpor� while ensuring ihey are separated from �ircra� arr�ving an Runv+rays 12L. and '�ZR or d�pa�ing Runway 17. The c►perational change representect by �se c�f fih� 19Q�degree headi�g, a� defiailed a�ve, has resu(ted in concer�tra#ed de�ar�ute operatians b�[ow 3,ilflC3 feet A�L aver r�:s4dential n�ighborhavds in northeas� Ru�rnsville. �or re�Ference, irt the above mentioned Runway � 7 C3p EA dcacumer�t the 185-degree tra�k (�tvsest trac[c tcs a�9a-d+�gr�e he�ding} was mc�cE�led at 34.�' auerage daily deparkure operatic�ns representing approximateiy 12A% of t�e tota! average d�i[y �tunu�ray 17 de�art�re c►perations and approxirnately 2t�.7°/a caf th� tflial westbaunci depar�ure operatians with a fr�rc��as� ofi 575.p04 fota! MSP operatians (289.4 �verage daily Runway 17 depariure apera�ior�s}. To #urther �naiyze the specif�c flight trac� irsnds that res€alt from the 19Q-d�gree heading pro�isic�n MAC staff analyzed actua[ flic�ht teack d�#a afF Rur�w�y 17. The Geogr�phical tnformation Sysiem {�I�) anaMysis f�act�sed an an �rea defin�d by a geographic extent that was cietermined by the actual locatian af the 190-dec�ree heading fl�ght tracks ouer fi�s grat�nd. T�e speci�c area analyzed for over�ights was �ief�rted by the �(ig%t frack concentratian an tf�e west side of runway h�adirtg off Run�vay 17 in �Eanuary 2f}t36 during iime periacis wh�r� Runways 1�L and 't2R were bc�ing used fr�r arrival operatiarts. �"Fina! Envlrextmenfai Assessmen# and Finding c�f 1Vo Sig»ific�rtt Impact {FONSt}! Ftecx�rd df Oed.sk�n (ROLtj ier the tr�pte�rierrcatlon af a E7eparture Procedure nff Rurivvay 17�" FAA� July 2C}�3. p. A-8. May 19, 2ab6 Mr, Rydeen Page 3 (n summary, �h�re were 'f 8,214 �otat {92.1 �verage ciaity} Runway 9 7, depar�ure crperaiia�s from Qc�c�ber 27, 2005 #g April 2t�, 2U�fi. C3f those 25.�%, �ar 4s139 tot�t {23.5 average daily� operations with westbound dest'rnations pass�d through t�e � 9U�degree heading gate. The 190-dsgree f�e�ding apera�ions with westbr�und destinations represenfied �4.4°10 of the to�a[ 7,�i4� (43.2 average daily} Runway 17 departure operativns wifih wes�bound destir�ations. During this fiime �eriod �h�re were 't'�.8 average daily Ctass B Airs�ace transition operatior�s tQ the northwest of MSP. In t�e cantext of the mc�st recent er�vironmenfiai documenfia#ion c�n Runway '1713� 4Runway 1� CtP �A� the exisiing c�pera�ion�l tr�nds wauld resu�i �r� 94.2 average daily Runw�y �t 7 dep�rture operatiar�s on a 190-degrc�e headin�. Ti�is oper�tianaC prc�visic�n resuits in the highest utilized departure head�ng off Runway 17, by €�rders af magr�it€�ele, �r�d mprec��er, it is NC?C's belief that this re�tr��tio�r repr�sents a he�cfing that was not madeled in pric�r envirc�nm�r�tal dncumentatfon. As a result of t��se departur� operatior�s MAC �loise Program sta�F artd ihe City of Burnsvi[le have been receiving numercaus cc,�mplaints fr�om gurr�sville residents under the Ru�way 17, '€9�-degree d�parture heading. A csamman inquiry is why sc�me operatians can�vfi be direcked aver the unpt�pulaied Nlinnesata River Va(Mey {i.e. IN�lf Track L— 23d-degr�e heaclingj, which is mare an caurse vvith tf�e destina�it�r� th�y ap�ear i� presently be rout�d to by ti�e FAA after pass�ng c�v�r the residential areas on the n�ar��east sEde af Burnsvil�e. 1n consic�erativn af this cortc�rn anc4 the comrnents �resented by #he �ity of BumsvilEe at �he May 17, 2C3U5 NOC meetir�g, t�te �t�C unanirr�o�siy voted ta forward the failvwing qu�stions tc� the FAA for a written respanse: �t . Ver�fy th+� disc�epar�cy befiwe�n the actual departure prncedures and t�ose �nvisia�ed ir� the documents listed above. 2. Explain why the 19Q-he�dir�� restrictic�n w�s not incf�rded in ihQ planr�ing documents listed above if it is aperationally necessary today. 3. If the Fina�i �nvironmertta� Impact 5taiement �nd the Er�vironm�ntai Assessment were bas�d on ciep�riure procedures fram Runw�y 17 fihafi are signi%cantly c�ifferent frcrm the proeedur�s actu�ity being used, won`t new er�viranmen�l evaluatic�ns be necessary including a reeval�afiion of the ph#L, no�se confiours resulting from th� prigin�l modelir�g? 4. lftihafi proced�res vrrill the FAA implement to prc�vide reiief to #hose n�atively a�fected !�y this unforeseen, un�lar�r�ed, anci unannau�cec� r�eparture pracedure? 5. Assumit�g th�t the Giass 8 Airspace transitions �re a significan� ticiver Qf the ��0- dec�re�: stip�iatiran, w�at is �AA's positiran on t%e pria�itiz�tic�n vf rniniFnaf Ciass � transifiion ap�ratNons {11.8 average d�ily operatipr�s} pver thausands of deparkure r�peratic�ns o�F Rur�way 17 at MSP? May �t9, ��OS Mr. Ryde�n Page � We �re fc�ntvarc4ing the abav� �ve ques�ions vr� beha(i af t#�e NpC and traok fc�rward �c� yourrespanse. As always thank yau for yc��rr cans`►deration anci attentic�n ta air tr��c nQ�se issu�s around MSP. ��n�erely, � Vem Wi1�x �{C.�C Gcr-C�tair � C�ty Councii Member — C��y o� Bioomington ��2.-�i�G.�a�...r--� ..`.�"�.../ K�tF�le�n Nelson N(JG Go-Chair & N�r�hwest Air�in�s Regional p�r�cfiar — Airiine Affairs cc: N1SP N{)G Mr. Tom Nansen — Depufy City Manager, Giiy of Burnsville Mr, Ni�el Finney -- Deputy Execufiv� Dire�tor, Planning and Envirr,nment Mr. Tflm Anderson -- i1�lAC G�ner�l Cvur�s�i Il�r. R,ay Fuhm�snr� — l�irector af Enuiro�rnent Mr. Chuc�C Prack -- �AA Great L.akes Re�ic�n Lega1 �our�s�i Mr. Gl� Orcutt -- FAA Mir�ne�pc�lis A1�4 Ms. Anriette Davis —�AA Gr�at Lakes Rec�ivrt �nvironrr�ental Spe�i�l�st i �!� �t��1{'� Stafe �i�p�esen#ative Assistant Majari�r Whip District 38A I�afcQia Gounty �c�rnsviile and �agan � . . � : � � ' � .� � ,-� , ��. �. �� ♦ � �. C4A�'i'!IT'f EES: CQMNIERC� & FiNANC1AL INSTTTUTIQNS, Gt-�AIR JOBS & ECONONfiC OPFORTUNITX F3TiA2VC8 H�A�.TT-i POLTGY 8c F1I�2ATdCE JL�Pr �y LVV� �vlr. Ca:�l .R.y{leeTl. Man�.ger, �'AA Cor�trol Tawer 6311 34tkZ Av�. S. 1Vlinn�apc�lis, Mhi 55450 l�ear Iv�.r. �Lyde�u, We hav� ��ce�ved a c�apy of t1�e Iv�ay i9, 24461�Toise Oversi�ht Gprt�rt�ttee �NOG) letter to you __ cegari�ing t�.e use af the � 94 degre� d�saErtur� �ead��g off Ru��way 17 at .Minneapolzs-St. �'au% ( ) I.nterna�ional Airport {IvISP}. We aar� wr�ti.ng ta express our conce�m and request that FA.A mak� .__ every e�'ozt tt� ens�xre consist�ncy wi� pz�or �.unway 17 depaz-�ure flig�t tracic assum�tiazas as oi.c�lined in t3�e plan�ing �ad environmentai docu�nents leading up ta the run�xray's opening. 'T�.a resid�nts lxvir�,g u� northwest Eagar� and �astern Burnsvit�e are experien�ing conc�r�trated aircraft ravec fligl�ts a�d assc�ciated ��se i��pae� as a result c��' wlxat appears fio be c►perational incaresistez�cies with prior Qperatio�ai plans �s autli�ed in th� Ivfay 1998 Iv�SP Dual-Traak �i�al Environmental �pact Statement a�d subsequent ezxviroz}ar�ez�� doc�e�xis detailing ihe zmpacts from the new n�nway. Co�szdering t�e above, we request your seria�s cansi�e�at€oz� fa�- c�pening� u� �e westbo�d de�rartu.r� �headings off R.u.nw�y �'7 �a a 23{� degree extent (4v�r t�e unpc�puiated N#innesa�a �.iver Va�t�y� w�er�. the airport is zn a so��east o�eratza�:a� flow as was xeprese�t� and az�alyzed pria� tc� the openi.n� c�� Runway 17/35 at MSP. '1"�a.rzl� you for your consideration c�f this xequest. �i_r�cere�y, � �,'". ��„'".�"i`r"�� r Tim Wztkzn ilce McGinn State �.epres�ntative Sta�e Senator i495 �ngswoad �'and �id., �agan, Minnescrta 55172 (651} 994-8293 55t State Ofilioe Bui(dinq:100 Rev i7r NfartRn Luther Kin Jr Bh�d, St. Paul. Minn�sota 58'#55-7296 651 296-3533 �♦�„� FAX: (65i) 297-2688 T'CY: {651) 296-989B Email: rep.tlm.wiikin@hauss.mn � m i �- � � C cc: MSP N�ri�e Oversigl�t Caminittee Eagaz� A�zpart Re�atian Cazx�m.xssion 1VIr. Craig �be�irzg — C�ty Ma�a,�er, City of Bumsv��le Mr. '�'o�n Hanse� - Deputy City Mauager, City. of Burnsville Mr. Tfaonrxas L. Hedges — City A.dmx�zistra#r�ar, Ci�y of Ea�an �rls. �.7iar�ne ��Iler — Asst. Czty Adminisfratar, City o� Ea�an Mr. Mitch KaEi�an — Nlet�opn��tan Airp4rts Cam�missiaa� M�r. Chad Lec�ve — Metro�oli�a� A.ups�rts Corr�m.ission Mr. Chuck Pra�k - FAA. Gre�t La�es Regi,on �.egal �ou�zs�l Mr. Gten Orcu�i - FAA. Mi,nnea�a�is .AD{� � Ms. A�et€e Ilavis - FAA Great Lakes Regi€�n Envzroxzm�tal Specialist C �. U.S. taepartment ot ir+�nspor#c�ttbn Federa# Aviation ,Atimiriietrpiion Jt�e 2, 200E� Fecterat Aviatiort Administratiurt Gentrat isrtninat Operafions Mr. Vern'Vdilcox and Ms. Kathieen Nelson Cc�-Chairpersons, N'oise E7versig�t Cc�rn�nittee Nlinneapolis/St. Pa�l Internatir�na� Aizpart 6{}4fl 2&�` Avez�ue South M'rnneapotis, MN 55450-2799 i�ear Mr. Wilcox and 11rIs. Nelsvn: 2300 �ast De�or� Avenue !}8s Plainas, tL &0018 '�`liis ietter zs in r�spc�ns� tti you� ccsrrespsa�de�ce af Ii�ay 19, 2Qf?�i, to Iv1r. Carl ltydeen, regarding departt�re pracedures far Rur�way 1'i/�5. �"he Federal Aviation Admi�stratzan {�AAj agrees that ��ez�si�ve p�anning, cansu.Itatit�n, anc� coordina�iot� oecurred in order �or �.tu�way 17135 tt� catne to fruitian. This �rocess inc�uded exfiensive enviranmental evalua�inrt in accorda�tce with the Nat�ouai Environmeniat Palicy Act af I9�9 (T�TEPA}, Counci� on Envi�onmental Quality regutatio�s for i�plem�nti�zg the prc�cedurak provisions oiNEPA, �A.A. directives, a�d State of Mi�esota r�c�uzrements. T�rdug�xc�ut, the Air Tra�ic t�rganization has had ac#ive involvement. _- 1 i The mc�si recent e�viranmental documentatio� w�th xegard to�operatian of the new runway consists af ar� environme�.taE assessmte�t (�A}, dated August �5, 2003, a�d fin.d�g o�`no szgcu�icant im�act �FC3NS�), c�ated A.u,�ust 27, 2003, fc�r �mp�emezatai�an o�'a 2.S nautical miie tc�rr� poz�t procerlure, a rzver depaz�ure procedu��, and a z�iv�r ��adiz�g �ig�ht fxack pz�vicedu�-e. Ti�e catalyst fvr the EAfF�}NSI was reeammendat�a� for �mp��me�tation o£ the no�se abate��nt pzc�eeclures in t�e �(30� �'art 15fl �tudy LTpdate. ��cause th� Part 15Q Stcidy Update occurred subseq��ent to the environmenta[ impact st�tement far co�structir�n of the r€�nway and tl�� c�ise abatcrne�t procedures involve chan,ges tU a%r traf�ic cpntrc�l pr[�cedure5 Over tiC��Se setlSit�Ve ai'e�s at 1�55 t�� 3,t�00 �eet abQUe �raund ievei, they were xequired fo be evaluated within an �A. Pa�� A-�1 of the EA st�tes �hat when aircra� are ar�iv�ng �t.unways 12R. a,r�d 12L,, the airspace i�cIusive r�£the 23� deg�ee ta 2$5 tiegree tracks wauld be nat�tx�ally used %r arrivais. As such, aircra#'t departirzg Runway 1.7 would ngt nor�nally be asszg�ied to a heading west of 230 ttegraes. T�e Iangua�e in the EA dtr�s n�t state that in a11 in.stan.ces depaa�ure aircza� vvouid be assigned heacii€�g �30. Page A-9 of the �A esti�nates ttse of`the �30 degree �eading to be 7.9 percent oi� a �early basis. t�.t t�e pr�s�nt tzrne ther� is na data thaY reveals how the runways are b�ing used c�rz a yearl� basis. Im�csrtantly, use o£ a 230 degree heading for depa:rtures while ta.�;dxng aircral� are operatin�; near the 230 degr�� radia� within the arrival deseeni a�rea znay not provide for adequate aircraft separation, pat�n.tiai�y �esuit�x�g i�: ar� unsafe o}�er�tian. Page I I af the EA states ttxat the 230 degree headin�; vvauid be vnly �sed wh.en a�x traffc control to��er perso��nei could ef�cient�y use the praeedure and ihat the procedu�e wou3.d �ot be used wh�n zneteorotogical conditions, Qperatior�al conditions, ar erther facto�s preclude the praeed�.re fram being safely ezxzploy�d. Furthermore, page 14 of #he �'flNS� siat�s that the noise abatemeni dspa,rture praaedures would not �e ��sed when the FAA deems t�em ina�propriate for use due tc� safety �actors ar c�peratianal condit�c��ns. It is impc�rtant tc� note that when I2.unways 34R and 30L are zn use, which is appra�irnately Stl pe�cen.t of the time, aircraft are assi�ed a heading of 230 de,g�es. Pag� A.-8 o�t�e EA s�a.tes that air �ffic assigns �,�adi�gs ir� S de�ree incre�nents and anay assign a�y heading w�tlair� t�e speci�ed depa,�.ure f�; of 495 degre�s ta 28� d�egrees ta depa�.ures �rom R.unway t 7. As such, the �`AA does not v��vv us� af a 194 �eacii:�g to be a c�ar�ge z� proced�ze. As stat�d ic� Ivlr. Ryd��uu'� lett�r, th� FAA is vvc�rki�g to atl��at� the a�ver-�igk�t co�c�rns vaz��d by B�rr�sviile res�de�.ts, but t�is tak.es time. Tliis is because c%az�gi�n�g �rocedures in. an�e �rspace area �as the pot�n�ial to require subsec�ueni chang�s in atl�er �irspace areas. Addition�ily, t.�e FAA is r��i�red to prot�ide s�e and ��#icie�.t serviae far a�l �rspac� us�rs, n.at just far aircraft departing Tt�.way I'�. "�'i�e air ix�� eonirvl �ower wi�l begin a 30-day evaluaii�rn af utilizing a�00 degree heading far dep�es fram Runway � 7 is� Jt�ne. In the e�ve�t ��at #he FAA determznes that enviran�ental reevaluation af the 20�3 E1�IF4ItiTS� acising frozn thes� issues is apprapriate, we will do sa. SincereiY, €��tn...�,��-�,, At3ri��.i� ��vt9 Act�ng i1�ta�zagex, Airspace an� Procedures Br�ch CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: � James E. Danielson, City Administrator SUBJECT: ARC Brochure DISCUSSION: ;�,;c� �z I have made the updates to the ARC Brochure from the �s�-8, 2006 meeting. Please make sure I captured ali your comments before we print. _ _ _ _ �� ) . ', ) j; . � � N M d' � d' v � .� � U � U N P� .� N � � w �t' N � N N �f' .� U N U ✓ .� C/� � 0 � w ai � ,� ;� , v� � �i � o � � � � o • --� � �; 3 �� o o � �' � � 0 o '� -� � U , � � � ' � � . d � ;.-� a� o � ..�' � � � a� � � U � U � � � � � � � � � � � U� � � o � o � � � � � � � � � � � ,.� � � �i ° � � � � � � a� U a� � � � o � 0 .� � rn ai Q�., '� � Q+ � v Q., � � �i a� o ° � �' o 0 � �' v � � � � H � � � � � � � � �, � � � ° � � ; � �� o � � � H.�•��.� �� ¢' G� j 3 � N o� O� O d- M M M V� �O � � d��' o� � v� rn d' �n �o � � '� � � i c .t.; : �" , %�" �' • ;,; . .. . �' • , �' 0 o a'-'i � � u 'd°}—i � • ?-1 � +-'Y O � � CCi �-F�-�, � � O,1J '� � �i .,.., � � � � � '� � Q�� m � � ... , ._..............,...,.._..._._,_�:;� k ..._..,......:,_........:,� ...,_..__...__..._.�__ _. ......... E.....,.,. .. ............._._....._._..�..,..,......,...._.....,. .. ..+� �C� /�'P ��J - P � � `�l; `�' `n� � � � �an�'.� .�"�ii"°C1 '�'��sU'• jp''`�"°S ��_:�-�--�'�i� .,�-.�„� 3�t.� � .r�'�s a �n�v�t rvo� ' Z • � � • - : �� , �, � �� {�-�� . � �! � � r"� " � = 4, � . �1 • � � CCj 'J � � V � E � � a 7-� O y'' i.� J N •� V U � � � � � � ~ '�' � E � j � � o. � o � �•� O CC3 � U > � a d '+-' � • � � � �q � �' N �4 ' i � � � o `i. � � `� . �, ^ �--�.__� � �_ �_•�._�.. _ _ . j- _ _ _e E � m. � _� _�. p � � ' j N bA ,.d ,� � � � �� v S' N O cd � �' � . � � � � � E � � p � a� a� O ,^ �'" Q? � � r/� '--� p '� 2? � Y !'�-' "d O O� � O � • � U "d ��-+ � � s.�., 0 „� O � � .-, U , � �� o � � �i � °� � "�""+� SC�., .� v] a� bp o �' � ,b � a��i p ,.d�y � p , � � ccf -t-�' � � N � %-' ,.d � .� i� � O� � � �+ v i�i 'C7 � a-� ,� O � c� , � ,Gi ,.�d s�-� s� � �' • � � c� (ll � . � � � � . ,-=� s��r O � S� N p � � � � dI � � ,-� p O ', � �' N s� . ,'—�..� � . � � � O � � O . � � • ,'�-� H U r� �., � • � � .—� � +.� � � �t � � . � '� H .—� � � e4 � � ,? �t ':;� 1' t � •� � � �d � � � � '� � � � � � � � � va ' � o '� �, � � U Vi � �-+ � � � O V � � � •� � � •.-�,1 ,� �.F.3 -.� O a�i .�1 `� � � U � � . � � � � � � ' `+ •° � � Cj o � Q � CJ Qi .tii +-+ � � s��- � � � � � U � � �.. � � � o �, � o o ,-� � � � .� � � � � bD � U � c�d •� t�d � � � � � � � � � � � on � . � ° � � ,� �O r��-, � � � � � � � 1-1 /~-� �F�1 V f� C1.i � V .-fl 'Cj ¢.� � '� � v� 4 U 0 �a . a�i o � � � w � . � ~ 'V �~`� m .� .=�cE� o m a � a U c m d � � ? c E y w � c v y `oa=GE m � �- oN€�m m_ np c yamZ� mm"m� _��°'� ��•mE� omzoU v�mUQ �S.00d� _�� U > � N � Q O i3�omE m m a � O ��3Z� �w� t .. � �- �1 . .„tG., :� -, :::! � .. .>+;r y...�� .. • i'{ ,'H' ,, t,;1 � ._ � iY, �;.: :,,'•' ��,�1� .+� �-Y; ... .. f•' ., Y �../�... I):, . . .. , .:'^ j - ,! ,' .., r „. �� . �� • � �-� � , " �,..�..i ~..i.�- . .. , , ..�. ../ a � ,,,t, +��., "�. �s i � <'�1'� „ .. . •�i ]�-�' ^ + "- , '�. � � m r' � � 11 ` �� . .•' n, ?. ,J ''. Y" P� ��a � : � w i � . ��, _ ��S . '� 1 ; _: ';3;�Y. . ..�i.{S� . .�t , �i :.-F..i.�-.i � �.4'\�. '?i't;{. a 7„F t � �) - • . �.. ,t .. _ :a., r0 y .., . • . - • 4� ..-,?ti., � . �.�.. S . . ti�. "'...b-� ,� ��i�G-! �� t- . . .� �� . i � . � s. +.:. _ . , , 9-. ._. .... � r t. _. .� _ .. �� ., .. ��