The URL can be used to link to this page

12-09-1998 ARC Packet' CITY OF MEIVDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION '� - � AGENDA December 9, 7 p.m. - Large Conference Room 1. Call to Order - 7 p.m. 2. Roli Call � 3.� Approval of November 12, 1998f Minutes. 4. Unfinished and New Business: a. Discuss Minneapolis/MAC�Third Parallel Runway Contract 5. Updates � a. Policy Advisory Committee - Part 150 Program � b. Runway 17-35 FEIS c. MASAC Goals and Work Plan for 1999 6. Acknov►rledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence: w` a. MASAC Agenda for December 1, 1998 & October 27, 1998 Minutes (Includes MASAC Operations Committee Minutes for Nov. 13) ' b. MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for October 1998 � c. MASAC Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for October 1998 d. Capitol Noise Newsletter with Richfield Article e. MSP News - November 19, 1998 f. Eagan ARC Agenda for December 8, 1998 g. MASAC Schedule for 1999 and MASAC Roster 7. Other Comments or Concerns. 8. Adjourn. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours-in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the Gity of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. -- . _ _._ 1 _ CITY OF MEIVDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MIIVNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS CONIMiSS10N MINUTES NOVEMBER 12, 1998 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Thursday, November 12, 1998:in�the City Hall Large Conference Room, 1 101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: Beaty, Des Roches, Roszak, Stein and May. Commissioners Leuman and Fitzer were excused. Also present were City Administrator Kevin Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF MIIVUTES " , Commissioner Roszak moved approval of the October 14, 1998 minutes with corrections. Commissioner Stein seconded the motion. AYES: 5 .�_ IVAYS: 0 _ APPOIi�T ALTERIVATES TO DECEMBER 1, 1998 NIASAC IVIEETING Administrator Batchelder explained that each year, the MASAC combines its November and December meetings and conducts a meeting on the first Tuesday of December. He stated that the MASAC meeting is sched,uled for December 1, 199$. Batchelder stated that this date conflicts with the City's regularly scheduled City Council meeting, therefare, Mayor Mertensotto, Councilmember Smith and himself wilf be unable to attend the meeting. Batchelder explained that Mendota Heights has two seats on the MASAC Bo�ard �nd the Commission should discuss appointing alternates to serve an December 1, 1998. Commissioners Stein and May volunteered to serve at the December 1, 1998 MASAC meeting. Chair Beaty� inquired if Councilmember Smith will continue to serve on the MASAC Baard after her Council term expires. Batchelder responded that Mayor Mertensotto has asked Councilmember Smith to continue representing the City on the MASAC Board and she has agreed to do so. NOVEMBER 12, 7998 - A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES � �� Chair Beaty suggested that staff draft a thank you letter to Councilrnember { Smith expressing the Commission's gratitude for her role in serving the City of Mendota Heights on the MASAC Board. The entire Commission concurred with this suggestion. Batchelder stated that he would draft the letter. •�. Ground Noise Studv Administrator Batchelder explained that the Commission had discussed this issue at their October meeting. `He stated that fihe Commission was of the consensus that the City pursue all efforts in supporting the control of ground noise. He stated that the Commission acknowledged that ground noise is a factor in contributing to a noisy environment and that MASAC should help mitigate noise whenever p'ossible. He informed the Commission that MASAC intends to include ground noise control on their 1999 work plan goals. Batchelder informed the Commission that the City of Richfield is unhappy that the Ground Noise Study did not include their low frequency noise concern. Batchelder stated that the City of Richfield may be positioning to delay the construction of the new third parallel runway. He stated that this would concern Mendota Heights and that he informed the MASAC Op Committee that delaying the construction of the third parallel runway creates � a dis-benefit to the City of Mendota Heights. Regarding a question from the Commission, Batchelder explained that the City of Richfield has opposed the use ofi Runway 4-22. He explained that they have filed notice intending to sue and that the lawsuit was placed on hold. He stated that Richfield feels if the crosswind runway is used.20 percent of the time, then $40 million is needed to soundproof homes that will be impacted. He stated that the crosswind runway is not being utilized as it should be. He stated that the City of Richfield's �irport policy is driven by economic redevelopment needs. Commissioner Roszak inquired if a copy , of the settlement could be obtained. Batchelder responded that he would attempt to obtain any settlement documents from MAC. In response to a question from Commissioner Des Roches; Administrator Batcheldzr explained that low frequency ground noise is best measured using the C Weighted Noise Scale. Regarding the existing ground noise pad, it was noted that there are blast shields surrounding the area :and that there are no sound mitigation qualities to these shields. _ �. NOVEMBER 92, 7998 - AIRPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON MINUTES Z Batcheider informed the Commission that MASAC has received word that { Northwest Airlines may have their own noise run up pad and that MASAC has requested additional information on this. Runway 17-35 FEIS Administrator Batchelder explained that the Environmental Quality Board's review of this EIS has been delayed a month because the City of Richfield feels that the MAC did not adequately address the low frequency noise concerns. He stated that without the Environmental Quality Board's "stamp of approval", the new runway construction will not begin. Chair Beaty inquired ifi MASAC can push the MAC to study the low frequency noise concerns..., He suggested that he would like to see their comments on low frequency noise using the C Weighted Scale. He inquired if the Ldn Contours w�Pe generated using the A Weighted Scale. Administrator Batchelder responded yes. Beaty stated that he is interested in seeing these contours generated using the C Weighted Scale. Commissioner Roszak inquired if this suggestion could slow down the process of . construction the new runway. Batchelder responded that it would probably take a sometime to complete the study and more time to review the results. It was suggested that the FAA could research this suggestion instead of the ) MAC. Chair Beaty agreed and stated that he does not want to slow down " the new runway construction process. Crossing Procedure Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission that in response to the Crossing Procedure Study the FAA has recently taken a proactive role in training their controllers on when to implement the crossing procedure. He informed the Gommission that the FAA Control Tower Supervisor recently appeared at a MASAC meeting where he indicated that the MAC and FAA are willing to work towards better compliance issues on the use of the , crossing procedure during single controller time periods. Chair Beaty stated that Stage 3 mandatory compliance is one year away and that Northwest Airlines has indicated they are close to 70 percent Stage 3 operations. He stated that the ANOMS report still indicates that Northwest is in the low to mid 60 percentile Stage 3 compliance. NOVEMBER 12, 7998 - A/RPORT RELATIONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES 3 MISCELLANEOUS Regarding the status of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission that the City Council has requested a six month extension from the Met Council. He stated that the Council has hired Mr. Steve Grittman, of Northwest Associated Consultants, to complete the Comprehensive Plan amendment process. He informed the Commission that at a recent Council workshop, the Council discussed the importance of including an airport chapter:within the City's Comprehensive Plan. He stated that the Council feels that airport issues are a very high priority. Batchelder informed the Commission that the City of Eagan has hired Jamie Verbrugge as their new Assistant to the City Administrator. He reminded the Commission that Jon Hohenstein had left the City of Eagan several months ago. He informed the Commission that Mr. Verbrugge was employed with the City of Richfield. He explained that the NDCARC will begin meeting once Mr. Verbrugge has had time to settle in his position. _ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Airport Noise Report for ; October 9, 1998. �.. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Agenda for October 27, 1998 and September 22, 1998 Minutes. The Commission noted that there seems to be more people attending the MASAC meetings. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for September 1998. It was noted that September complaints are done from 1997 September complaints. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAG Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for September 1998. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Operations Committee Agenda for November 13, 1998. Administrator Batchelder informed the Cor�mission that the new tower chief is from Orlando. The Commission acknowledge receipt of a Smithsonian Article entitled The Dominoes are Falling. . _ _ � , NOVEMBER 12, 1998 - A/RPORT RELATIONS COMM/SS/ON MINUTES 4 The Commissioner acknowledged receipt of the Eagan ARC Agenda for November 10, 1998. I� � L�1�1��i ►�I-11_�► �� There being no further business, the Airport Relations Commission adjourned its meeting at 8:26 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary NOVEMBER 12, 9998 - A/RPORT RELATIONS COMM/SSION M/NUTES 5 C, FOR IMMEDIA.TE RELEASE Tuesday, November 17, 1998 Contact Wendy Burt 612-726-533 S Jennifer Bagdade b12-726-8170 METROPOLITAN AIl2.PORTS COi�IMISSION, CITY OF Mi3�iIvTEAPOLIS REACH AGREE�iENTS FOR NO THIRD PARA.LLEL RUNWAY AND SUPPORT FO�t NOR�'H-SOiJTH RUlYWAY, TEMPORA.RY EXTENSION The 3vietropolitan A.irports Commission (MAC) and the City of Minneapolis have reached two agreements regardin� development at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. In a contract signed by MAC and 1'vSinneapolis: ;' ) � MAC will not build a third parallel runway. - • The North/South runway will not be used for departures to the north and arrivals to the south except under ]imited circumstances. � The new runway will be operated to maximize tvSinneapolis-St. Paul International Airport's (MSP) capacit}' «'hile reducing noise in the City of ��linneapolis and equitably distributina noise throu�hout all communities. � The City of Minneapolis aQre�s to suppor ihe Nor�h/South Runway. e If MAC acquires the Bureau of i1��ines property north of the airport, it would arant a conservation easement to the i`Iational Par� Service and use the property for open space. � MAC tivill expand the noise monitorina syste;n in the area afiec�ed by the existina parallel runways. � iv1AC reatiirms its commitment to a fairer distribution of air tra�c. The MAC also si�ned an aareement ��.�ith the �y of I��inneapolis allowina MAC to build a temporary e;ttension to tne south psr�llel rum�✓ay for use in tne yezr 2000 �vhen Runway 4/22 is e;ctended from ] 1,000 to 12,000 feet. '�L�C aarees to use the n�m��ay e:��ension only durin� constru�ion on Runl�ay 4/23 and to ?�crow S l G0,000 to be used to demo!ish the extension if �'iAC uses the extension beyond tne �,: eement. ( mor�;; � Minneapolis Agreement Pa�e two In 1996, the Minnesota Legislature concluded a Dual Track Airport Plannino Process which studied alternatives for expansion at i�inneapolis-St. Paul Inter�ational Airport and options for building a new airport to accommodate air travel needs throuah the year ?010. The le�islature mandated that Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport be expanded at its present site, and that a fourth runway be developed to meet capacity demands. The Legislature also required that the MAC enter into contracts ��ith communities that would be affected by a third parallel rum�ray, specifyina that that IviAC would not construct such a runway without the approval of the af"�zected communities. In June 1998, the Commission approved a tentative aQreement with the City of Minneapolis. � If the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board approves the Final Environmental Impact Statement on Wednesday, November 18, 1998, construction on the new runway could beain immediately with completion by 2003. :.�� ,-.—; :-'� C" ` Nov 23 98 02:55p Charles E. Mertensotto (612) 222-4755 p.l NOV 23 '98 �2��PM P.l 1 _ I �� T �� Li�� 1 ��1.'� �� CITI' OF IaI�N1i�EA►P'�LI� TO: � �o�� M.o�� cc�rr�v�x Assistant City Attarney • 300 Metropolitan Centre 333 Sauth Seventh Street Minneagolis, Minnesota 55402-2453 Phone: (612) 6?3-2182 Fax: (512) 673-3362 E-Mail: carey.conover@ci.minneapolis.mn.us � ) � �- Fa�c #: j ._..- �ztc. 1 N0. OF PAGES_��- �`�'��'��`'� COI'�MEI�ITS: � v �� tX,� � U C ( ) CHECI� �F ATT�DR,NEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED INFORMATI(�N � Nov 23 98 02:55p :: � ,.:' : .�; ' NOV 23 . ' 98 0� � �3PM , si��''' ' c . . . . . . . .#+�!' . . , . .. r�� .�� Charles E. Mertensotto [6121 222-4755 p.3 . �. . au��12�i998�--- . .P.z��;� �::�. : . ' . . ' . .19.-.---- . Cy� � . GZh� CIurY C�PdTRA.CT PERTAINII�G T� L�'TS � ON C�NSTRUC'��d OF �. � � � '�F� pARALLEL R�JNVt'AX � . I. ItECiTALS. � l. The Minnesota Legislature, at its 1996 session, has enacted Laws of Minnesota, Chapter A�64, Art. 3, � Sec. 14 (hereinafter "the Runway Statute'�, wh.ich amends Mirmesota Statutes 1994, Sec. 473.60$ to �require the Mettapolitan Airports Commission (heteinafter "the Commissian" ar "MAC"} to enter inio certain contracts `�ith each affecteci city ihat provides the corporation [MAC] may not constn�ct a ctiud parallel tunway ai the Minneapolis-St. Paul international airport without the affected city's apprcval." . 2. �. The itunway Statute defines "affecied cit}�' as being any city that would experience an increase in the area located Within the 60 Ldn noise cantour as a result of _ aperations using a third parallel runway constructed at the Minneapalis-Sai�t Paul International Aitport (hereinafter "the Airport"). 3. The Commission has deterjnined that the City of Minneapolis (hereinafter "the City") is an affected city witiun the snea�ting af the Runway Statute. 4. The Commission and the City haVe met and negotiated in good faith concerning the terms and conditions af the contract required by the Ft.ur.way Statute, and have arrived at an agreement (hereinafter "the Ageement'� which both parties desire to set forth in writing. The City and MAC have identified other matters of mutual inierest that are also addressed in this contract. II. DE�ii Ii'�OidS. 1. . The term "this'd parallef runway„ shall mean any runway used for the an'ival or depaztui'e af au' traffic at the Airport constructed to the north of and generally paraliei to the existing pazallel zvnways kno��vn as 30IJ12R and 30R/12L {based on the geographic location of tbe parallel runways at ihe time of e'xecution of this Agseement). "Generally paratlei", for purposes herein, shall inctude any runway that is constructed to the nort3� andlor east of ti�e �xisting parallei runways �own as 30L/12R and 30R/12L and that has a ceuteriine witbin sixty �{60) compass degrees af the centerline of the existing pa.rallel runways ai their present lacatio�. �,: _ 2. TE►e term "eoustrueY' shall mean physical construction and actions greliminary to construction, includ.ing land acquisition necessary far consmiction, inclusion of �'unds for eonstruetion in tbe capital irnpravement program budget or solicitation of bids for Nov 23 98 02:55p Charles E. Mertensotto (6121 222-4755 r ; � � N0� 23� ' 98 , � ,02 �,OaPM :: , • ' . , ' . . . .. : ,. . . . .-, . . . . .. . .,. ... . • . . . .. . .. �'1< :.,:: . .. : . .. . . . � ,perforQ►ance, of physical consttuction provided that the teini shall �aot include plaiuiing � activity. The term "construcf' shall not iriclude land acquisitions by the Cornrnission so long as ihe acquisitian of any propexty to the north of and generally paral�ei to the � existing parallel Fvnwaps includes as a iesnictive covenani in the deed of c�nveyance that ��' the acquired land shall not be used for runway purposes during the peri4ii for which this Agreement is effective, piovided ti�at such restrictive covenant shal! expressly zun for tize . benefi[ of the "a£fected property owners" as defined in paragraph 4 below. 3: The term "approval" shall mean�a legally binding assent occurring through action by which the City legally binds itself. � P.3 4. The term "affected properry owner" means any owner (whether a legal owner or an equitable awn�r} of real property which property is within tbat part of the City which: a) would be brought into the 64 Ldn noise contour as a result of operations . on the third garallei runway; or b} is within the 60 Ldn contour as determined without ihe third parallei runway and which would experience a 1.5 or gteater Ldn increasc as a result of � operations on a third parallel runway. The Commission and the City agxee that a diagram which designates the area meeting r' %�) this criteria shall be developed by the Cammission not later than ninety days subsequent `. ..- tt� execuiion af this Agreement by the City, which diagcam will be subjecE to ihe City's review and approval. IIi. TERMS. I. The term of t�e Agreement shall be from October 1, 199� (the date af this Agreemeni) to Dccember 31, 2050; provided that, comrnencing on January l, 2436, the provisions oF this Agreement reiated to a third paralfel n.uaway may be tetTninated by statutory enactment which contains an express finding by t1�e Minnesota Legislatttre that, in its judgment, taiQng into account the welfare of the S#ate of Mituiesota, there is no prtzdent ar feasible alternative to construcrion of a third parallel nu�way. 2. During the period for which this Agreement is effective, the Commissian promises that ii shall not, without approval of the City, construct a third parallel tuuway, The Commissiap promisas that prior to December 31, 2035, iE shaSl not af��irmatively advocate canstrucrion of a third parallel nuzway, provided that nothing in this Agresment shall prevent the Commissiou from responding to requests for mformation and advice made by the legislative or execuiive branchss of state governmeut, or their constituent parts or designees. 3. During the period for which ttais Agzeement is effective, the affected properry ovmers shall have third party beneficiary rigbts t� enforce t6e provisians of this (� �) �� " Z �:� C Nov 23 98 02:56p Charles E. Mertensotto (6121 z22-4755 NOV 23 '98 02��4PM . � � . . - . P.4 . , • � f ,. : : � � ; ;.;'•.i,t,. .,. ,: Agreement related to the pro3ubition on construcdon of a: third parallel runway in the event that a siate law changes, supersedes or invalidates this Agreemcnt or if a sEate Iaw autharizes ar enables the Commission to construct a� ihird parallet runway withaut appraval of the City. . It is furt�ter agreed that this right of enforcement shalt include the right to seek specific enforcement and injunctive relief. Said third party beneficiary rights shall cease upon the expintion of this agzeement ar its termination pursuant ta the terms ofihis A�eement. -� 4. During tlie period for which this Agreement is effective, the City promises that it shail take no action to oppose the plaaning and construction of a North Soutl� Runway (Runway t7/35), as such runway is described in the Airport's 2010 Long-term Comprehensive Plan and thc Dual Track Airport Planning Prosess Final Environmentat Impact Statemcni, May, 1998 ("DTAPPlEIS"), �� imPlem�ntation of ahich is directed by Laws of Minnesota 1996, Ch. 464,; Art. 3, Snbd. 24. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Ciry agrees: a) its approval of this Agreemer�t constitutes a declaratiou of the City endorsing ttle construction of the above-described North South Runway; and � � b) it shall not institute, be a pazry to, financially contribute to or in any other manner support any legislation or legal proceedings {wheihez judici2l, admuustrati�e or ather) which has as a goal oz intended effect the delay or prevention of construction of the above-described North South runway, incIuding withaat limitation, proceedings asserting rights under ertvirazLmentaI laws or regulations. 5. The �inal Record of Decision, Minneapolis-St. PauI Intern.ational Airport, Dual Track p�jspart Planning Process, New Runway 17J35 and Auport Layout Plan AppTo�at (September I998} includes the following tanguage on page 56: ;� Consistent with FA.A coQunitments made to the City of Minneapolis," MSP conu'ol tower persannei wiil utilize Runway 17l35 in acc�rdance with the conditrons set forth in the Dual Track Airport Planning Process FEIS, Appendix A, page A.3-17. lherefore, tower personnel wiil utilize Runway 17/35 so that the ritnway is not used for departures to the nozth and arrivals to the south, except under the following Iimited cucumstances, described on page A.3-17 of the FEIS: (1) safety reasons; (2) weather c�nditians; or (3) temporary tvnway closures due to snow remaval, due to construction, or due to otber activi�es at che sirpozt. ['-Letter from Jane F. Garvey, FA-A. Adiuinistrator, to Mumeapoiis Mayor Shacon Sayies,Belton, dated 3uly 15,1998.j 3 p.4 a C ( Nov 23 98 02:57p Charles E. Mertensotto (6121 222-4755 p.5 � . ', . NOV �23 '98 8Z�05PM � � • � P.5 . . . , . . •,:::: ::.., _.. .. :.:.. . . . ..; . � : • :.. .:.........:.:.:_. ... .. ::,.:. . . . . � .. ,., .. , . , . . . . : � .: _ . . i ', • . . . : . . ' . . ' . . . � As noied, the FAA has addressed this matter directly in a letter to Mayor Sharon � Sayles Belton dated July 15, l99$, a copy of wbich is attached hereto as Exhibit A. In his . . .. . . . . letter, the FAA states that if a Record of Decision is issucd approving the proposed . � ]2unway 17/35, the�above-referenced language would be included in tisat decision and in the applicabi� tawei order. This language is taken from the text and table on page A.3-17 � (Appendix A) af thc Dual Track Airport Planning Process, Final Envimnmental Impact Statement, May,.1998 (DT.APP/EIS). Table A.3-7 of the DTAPPIEIS, "Runway Use f4r MST' AItemative - Average Annual Use" indicates that less than 0.05 percent of arrivals would be from the north, and less than 0.05 percent of the departures wouid be to the north an Runway 1?/35 and tl�at the projected usc of Runway l�/35 is cansistent with � MAC's goals and intent. : � Subject to the above operational requirerneuts, the Commiss�an agrees that Runway 17/3S, ihe No�th Soutii Runway, should bc operated in a manner designed io maximSze the air6eld capacity of the Airport, while reducing noise in the City of Minneapolis and equitably disrributing noise ttiroughout the camruunity. Furtber, in support of this commitrnent, the Commission agees dvring the tezm of ttus Agreement not ta seek to permanently close down one or both of the existing paraliel ntnways without the approval of the Gity, including a commitment not to spend Commission funds, or seek or spend federal funds, PFC revenue or other funds for such a purpose and not to request a change in the runway use system in place at the Auport which would be inconsistent with tbis Section. 6. During the period for which this Agreement is effective, the Com.mission agzees that it shatl nat acquire for use as part of the air operations azea land within. the boundaries af the City located north of State Highway 52 (commonly known as "the Crosstown Highway") withoui approval of the City except for the paxposes of runway approach prateciion, as part of a mutually agreed upon part of the Part 150 pragram or To locate navigationa� aids. 7. The Commission agrees ta i�nmediately expand the Noise Monitoring Sysie.m in �: the area affected by the existing parallel runways. � 8. The Commissiou }�ereby afiirms its overall commitment to a fairez distribudon of � . air traffic, specifically,. its commianent prior to completion of the North South Runway to : use Rur�way 4/22 to�distribute traffic to other parts of the Metropolitan area 9. Possible Acqui$itiDn af B�M Latid a�d Lease/Ac�uisition of VA Land - Limitation an ses � . � A. The Commission�is corisidecing acquisition of property from the Urzited States of � America, Departaieni of the Interior, known as the Bureau of Mines land ("�OM land'�, Iocated north and east of the Airport between the Mississippi Ri�er and State Highway � � 55, and currently wishin the Mississippi Narional River and Recreation Area. . . . ._ . .. . -. . • • .. ., .. . 1 :.. . �' • .. . . . . E Nov 23 98 02:57p Charles E. Mertensotto (612) 222-4755 ' � NOV z3 '98 02�05PM� � . , . . • . -• � ' , P.6 •,�� ' � . . � .. � .. . �1 - . � . ' . ... .';' �. : � � - .. . . . � � � . � B. � � MAC ac3o�owledges that: . . . �, .. .�, the BOM 2and lies substantially within� a runway protectio� zone of the Airpoct and is subject to use restrictions vnder MAC's zoning requirements, ' federal regulatory and statutory provisions; and under Minnesota State Iaw; � should it acquire tbe BOM land, it would do so to assure comgarible land uses � within this area which requires that the BOM Iand be undeveloged. C. The City and MAC aclrnowledge that the BOivI land, which is included within the ` Mississippi NatiQnaI River and Reaeation Area esiablished by Congress, gossesses naturat, scenic, open sgace, educatioual and recreational values af great importance to thc residents of the City and af ihe State �of Minnesota. In addition, the BOIvi Iand is situated amang nurneraus sites of historic sigaificance and open space parks, including Fort Sn�elling 5tate Park, the Camp Coldwater Historic Site, artd the Mutnehaha Regional Pazk, and pravides scenic open spaee, aecess to historic sites, and access to scenie vistas of the Mississippi River.; The $OM land is a]so located adjacent to a scenic trail suitable for biking, hiking, and other forms of ]i�t outdoor recreation_ D. The City has identified several goals for the ase of the B(}M Iand, should it be _ acquired by MAC. These goais includc but are not lirnited to the following: 1) the BOM land should be used as open space and for light recrearion; 2) the BOM Iand shoutd be accessi6le to the general pubIic, inctuding but nof limited to a bike trail iinking . Minnehaha Regional Pazk and with Fort Snelling State park; 3) the historic sites resources of the BOM lar�d should be preserved aud made available ta the eommuniiy and the region; and 4) the BOM land shauld not be used for a tEvrd parallel runway, nor far ar�y supporiing use for a third parallel runway. .., _ . - E. MAC agrees that should it acquire the BOhi land, with the sole exception of limited, non-publiclairport ernployee parking and non-public automabile storage described beIow, the Property shall be limited in its use to open space, wildlife haisitat, and light ou4rioor recreation purposes only. Only these uses will be permitted. Prohibited uses include but are not limited ta use of Lhe BOM land for construction of airport runways, taxiways, aprons, hangazs, termin.�ls, commercial rentaI car activity, eammercial parking operations, Park and Ride sites, and all other commercial operations, except those uscs expressty provided in tlus sectian. . F. Demol`�ion of buii � gs. MAC a�rees that should it acquire tiie BOM land, alI .. ,. buildings presently 4n the BOM Iand shall be demalished within sixty (ba) s�onths of the �.. �.i date of this Agreement, and tiie land mnua�d to a n&iural vegetative staie consistent with .� ..� the use of the $OM land for scenic open space and light oukdoor recreation gurposes. Such demoGtion shall begin wtthin twettty-four (24) months of che date of this ' , Agreement. , 5 !'� Nov 23 98 �2:58p Ch�rles E. Mertensotto [6121 222-4755 p.� . ' ' NOv 23 ' 98... 02 � 06PM . . � ' ' ' . . . ..' ' • • .' � . ' . P.7 ,.,..., ....-.-. .... . .. -• ..:. .:,. ..-.',_'� . . . . .. . , . .. . , . . . ..... . . . ...:.. .... .:. 4 : ,.,._. .. . • . . . . . . . . . �. . . _ . . ' G• . C agrees that if it acquires the BOM land, it will use its best�efforts to errtcr ` into an agieemenf with an appropaate public entity for the operation and maintenance of the Froperty consisteat with the restricfions and goals detailed hereiu; and cansisient with ., th'e zestrictions on the use of the property imposed by applicabte�statutes�ordiaances and ' � regulations within one year from the date of this Agreement. This abligatioa shal! extend ta the� yeai� 2050. Further if such � entity believes that the � goaIs � herein can be accomglished without demoIition of onc or mote of the buildings cutzenkly on the BOM land, such entity shall present to MAC and the City a comprehensive plan £or th� use vf the BOM land anci any such building, and such plan must be approved by the City and by MAC wiihin twa yea,rs of the effective date hereof, ar MAC will begin the demolition of the buildings as described above. M.AC fiirther agrees that it, and�the entity with whom it eontraess hereunder, will work with the State Histaric Preservation Officc and othcrs to sssure ti�at historic sites vn the BOM laad aze protected and made accessible to the pubIic, � � � � � H• The onty excepiions to the limitativn on permitsed uses is for the puzpos� of praviding nanpublic/airpart employee par'g and/or for nonpubIic auiomobile storage. MAC agrees that the parking lots perrnirted hereunder �sbatl bc Iocated in the area described in Exhebit 2 of the Conscrvation Easement attached hereta as Exhibii B, shall � encompass na more than seven (7) acres in the aggregate, shall be Iandscaped to make the aPP��nca of the parlcing Iots consistent wicii t�te overall open space goais described herein, shali be surface lots only, and sheli provide space for no more than eight hundred. fifty (85fl} automobiles in tiie aggregate. � • I• MAC agrees that, if it acquires the BOM land, it shail norify the City sixty (60) days before undertaking any construction activities an the BOM iand, and shall requi7e any pubtic entity aperating and maintaining the BOM land ar any part thereof to'norify the City before it undertakes any canstruction act�vities on the BOI�i land. 7. .MAC agrees that, if it acquires the BOM land, it wi1I not erect, construct or place, nor permit the erection, construction or placemeat of, any building on the BOM land, eXeept for non-commercial str�ctures not to exceed ten feet in hcip,ht and only for uses incidental to perrnitted uses of the property. K• MAC agrees that, if it acqu'ues the BLM land, it shall grarit the conservatioa easement attached hercto as Exhibit $ to the NationaI Park Service thtough the yeaz 2050. The Commission shait also grant a third-party aght to enfarce this conservation easemerit to the City. The Coznmission a�so agrees tbat it shsll work with other agencies in strengthening ttze link berweea SKinnehaha Reg�onal Park aad Fort Snelling State Fark, includi,ag malang ]and available or access�ble for a trail connection of at least fifly feet in width for the lenngtb af the trail tonnecction. L• If the Commission eaters into a lease regartling the Veterans' Administration property located adjacent to, and immediately west o#', the Bureau of I'vlines property, and � currently within I��VR�1,4, ("t�e VA property'� or acquires some other property znterest 6 Nav 23 98 02:59p Charles E. Mertensatto (6121 222-4755 - •.:: • � ' �• . NOV 23 - . . ,98. �2�06PM - . . • . . , .. ; . ' . � P.8 � ; ' �'' � . . . .. • , ' •. . . . . ._ ,. . :: .. . . . . . . .. . : . . . .�. .. . .. • . . . ... : ;.....:. .. . ..•. . . .•• . a . • .:�.'< . , ;� _ , ..�r•::i: . � • .••�.•. :.,::.. ,., . : . ., . . . ..�.::t...� �; ,-;:•::;;•,;. „` .... . .. . . , . :. ... .... .: . . .. . �. ��. ; othez than fu11 ownership in fee simple, the lease or other �agreement shall restirict the use .� of the pmperty to open space and light recreational use in a manner oonsistent w�th the " .� .. restrictions on the nsage of the BOM land as set %sth herein �aiid in F.achibit B. if for any .' ', , reason the Commission is unabte to incorporate such restrictions into the lease or other �, .' agreomcat pertaintng to the VA properiy, the Commission `shatl "iestrict the � use of the �.� property by some other mechanism acceptable to the City. If the Commission acquires .� ' the VA pmperty in fee si.mpie, it agrees that it shall restrict the use of the�VA in a mannez � con,sistent with ths restrictions herein imposed upon ti�c BOM land and tizat it: shail g,tant .. a conservation; easement to the:National Pazk Service, including s third-party right to � . enforce the conservation easemant by;the City, for the VA property. Such conservation .. easemez�t shall restrict the use of the pioperty to open space and light recrearion uses, and '..' shall in form and conteai be siinilaz to Exhibit B. � 10. 7his Agreement consritufes the entire understanding of the parties hereto and shall nat be subjeci to any sIterationx supplement or zepeat except as agreed to in writi.ng. This Agreement shall be bind'vog upon the parties and theu successors and assigns. Approved as to fortn: ;:; � .: � � t... ;:t_ :l %� ►11..', . • ►.i:,� �i� � ; NIETROPOLI?.AN AIR.PORTS COMNIISSION i . , ��; • ..� .� Dated: _ _ i��t�— q� � CITY OF N,QNNEAPOLIS : �.. � � ,,, � • ' .� . � . / Dated: %�— �G ' �g � �.ta,..,. . '-' � i �!, —�, . •,; :. ...�,�.. � COLlilterSlglled: � Fin e Officer 7 �� C �,r4 tyr w`r t -�' " �,�,��; � r..t i: � :fi:s�G�.q,ss!'r SI �i:,r'�� u %'a;% aLc r•< :%i h -.�:. 4.' � Y.„i : � rr' c— G2Ly'r '-s:t;{�.;. - ;:"i=Kis�: r� '"1i5.`.NSv,:. �.. �`E"kt:. 1� � ?. t� Rti3�Y]Fi��.'1 � ;if:,:. �<;: x ;•- ..,t� �� r iz �;, ��ti ('t �r �5: Fr". �'t'F ; * ;:'t:: d '(�`Sv. •.x— .v:i. '. i7 `�F; �'fi+lftiea � {.� a"t'� �'�5:1 i i: �.:.,cr �:`- _ � �'�`i:e'.+t:�i�AAV, 4��.. Y ;i C 'y�il.ti'+n�i��r�!yi :'"`�'-p 3ti'l;#- .,'Y,*.ik•"- � � '•r �` �� 1.73''�.'%.�.ut� -+.';iC;*S:i31. i C Q ,I ' a :� � r_ j < #.� .,��. �;} t .� x ";, �ry� �; , �' � � l� �Y �� r �:. i ��wf a � iSt n1"4 .�; s.�NwK. '}. ` � :`, � ` ` + � �.c�,y : ^,�.•, `� v � �3�s * ..: �3;t�'2V�� k � i�.0 �$+�.�F_�� ` +y`�.=",p;;.iti;:��.y�i�iC'�t •sa'�. �.`:�4E'e3N.`'`.: �44" . � '� ` 'ti L r �fii� �'�f wf � p """". � �..,, '��^�,a.,`�`F�s::�3:�L' A •k ` �LL ,„ ., _ � ..- _�.: � �.� �}— = --- ... .. , , __.... ,. �... .,,�:, s:� �% �-,`- ,�ii� �i. ,� � . � �� _ _ � � � � �. � �� - �iYs ^ �; .�' _�,' i� ` �; ;i ; �. , ,.i: - ii i'�. .ii.�, ; .F.. .t' ,�.. `,� �;�- !, - E.�; � � <� � � ; � ., `�,. . � ^ � S � � � '�`. � a C.- (_ � �� ,�/ �+� ta' �� t x i � t � k f'-��:': }: $ Y ,ri�. �T ti ,,,.ii s{ ;�^'x � :�Yi: }y : i . v �,� ♦ � `,� U;. ,; " �#, , - ♦ ! _� - � � � � .t:�. ,:` , �. >��,��;v�:"'' � n. ,�:,..= f� ` ;,;:,. `;.`�`�''�r;` 'j� . � � ,r, �,�i�� t<`. :'l,�+5:s:!:Eey. — _� i � " ��"�..,�s� ':�:?:^i;L:kK`;�:!+."�°��`��',s":x�1CYr;;,,^c�%r •v'�e:'v=� =��:e'�::�:i.ri.i=x:;�tu"�', �/+ ` � � � � C C C ;� ` ;�' ;""i.i�. •_..::::%.:- ,f � =e: 'w�F: :�: y .�LI - , .<� ;�►= ��` .,.,� 4�: �=� ,.. 2i�iii ;�"�� +�"'�,, _ ;�' ��"° f.r.w - � •: Q � � o O � � Q ^ � t"� � sa u.�o }� ! o aa q�.0 r� i�� . • i• • V W y U � � C C. C. �.� : ��: ,, ,z ��i �_ � , `�`s. .T�; t"c' I��.: ��'"� -r:f �r �q ��y f�.y i.•1 y�r' O►', - V .. Y o �, C�/ ., 1I O o � �Sw' V � � � � i� � � � i suo�� u� s��a� � � • � • 1 , /r \ C C C C �. �. C. C�� C C C C� � <�' t,; �. � ;:a;:: _ I ,y'. .- '�bi.1.:..^,tt'�. Ix t � �:Yn�: ,�jy} ':jit+l.h:�•*' ti-�.".'` r:�k% .:'c;, - i�4i:# � \ �i:: .nF.}'ii4ti?:'t �i=.. � •p2:y,:l: �>... �•�:, �4:,. Sc=?iy � ':,h.:i«;,v.�tt F. .i� :. s�Yh! � t/ \ 1�� C C �; C � C C� C r� � Q. C ( \ � . C ' ( � 0 l'� � i � ��. C. C.. _. C � , � � � �t � ' � � � '�9 � � �q . R� � � � � , � � � � � � a � �$k� e%"+Y � � . ' / \ � � ,� � � � P' "'9 'r � � - „ � � � � � �� S � � �i' � � � � ;y � � � � � � �,�� - � � � �. f : � � •1�;�� w�� .i �'`� :Y�. � ; � � �:� �:�-�, _ ,�-w.�..-�.:- -..., � ,:,:�: :: �:�:.� -, �� .. � � � �.r� 7 � �,I�.. ...,...._._ ......_.._""""...,.__.._..,._. I_. � .:�N:� `�:::F` ..:!:-v %�thrii •eY!? "'?'Atio".7 ki�:A � k'S5 L`�i•�3' -'�.�, Fui�:. ,..� :,e:':^, :.�' :�:;,.a? x� A ,� r :f�nE � ,., �. � � � � � ' "`�V � � � � � � � � � � � _ � � � � O i`� � u� � ':d � j �•� � � .� � �i - i'�' �. �� :�,� "'`=a � � �> ;'r-'7 � `�� ':�-� �� `�'� `` � T ...� =�'�'' ..✓ —' �'� �� --�=-za� �--- � �-,r�- -�- T .-.- � �� _ �� -� f 4� �-= . � � ,r;�� "�,aT:`.-. . � �",� �.' ` �k !-� .. _ : �-��. ` �` _ � ,` �iwv-�:'� ` � '�• � i` :{• �\-�p•� . .._ i s� �.�w.sr�s-�. _� ... .«..-... _..�`t " �` __�. ..... j' :: \ i� a � �v'� � '�'� �' ` '1� � '.1''�L � � =' J ::�. � � ,�' diJ°'r''i1� �"y•�.��/r....$„� �� a'��J�-�"'r.e"`"Il��i-,.1_Q4� " � �r 5� v �.�,,, .,y� � +,"� ,y a.�f b „y ..,�,ur� �� s e^�`°1 1.1 L'�) l�'l,j .,�'i '"(�S � .LN-r-} — T� »,�; f"R C;..i, ,:�f�k-'� i"`;Kar� .r"��'�'? �-u,r�, 1 -�1;,��,�,Wa -�,�+j �� +�%'Y'� �'(')� { v ��'�,�y: `#,�'�`"" � ,,, z-� � � ,i 1..,.��-�''�/� —t '�a, '—"'��r'- ��! ._i �.1''�(,-�,' ,,,� ' L'') L"f`*' ys �4 , .`sti'' �....ri c . - � �i� :5--,..-�..�� "..�`_ �a� � i,,,., � ,,,.,,y,,, p � �.�J �:�..,,. � '� .' ._ 5 'i � �'2�' ��:"t.,.a�,�..,,!'"1„� � �..d+,,;1� � "�'t � � 1i� Z l.. f-'�..� ...]: �. � t v�i � 4v.^ t'n" � . . f •.. �� i � �,.,s:rZ -=,��-l.;t..,� " �ta,x �j _ `.._=-�''�� 3 �3-"�J .,n'"z"7-�n0� -" �'1 � V GY_:�� -Y"� �%'t�^,r! f4 �' r�'t%� ..j, 7 J �I/� � � � �,:,,j � � f� 1-� ti.y�'� _,,� sr"`..�'� ' �, ,_,: �') •'�~� � . � a � „ a Ca. * i ..�- �' .4a �''� �•;,.1 _..ti.�: "�"�"} '' � ..,;� _ _-,,...:�,.:�,.+, .e� �"'�"`� �y �/'y e ',s� � I f ) u . �_�; r�._.,4 r"�� r'S a�..i1 1-,.n � �,�, � 1 -✓ �-�-�-�,.� �.._-� i i� � :�.. ..�J, .r... � -�,--�-7 ;�-n PJ C'�.. �-- / l:"� n--� ._ni�G�. ':r' .......,. �,•,_'e�", i77 f�'y`' "`n''Sr _...r^.{:;��•e'Y..�-�'�' M��// � r� ✓ ys� y:,.::�,.�,'°,,�,y.��n�'�� `"a�''� l wa ?,� �� :.� �� a. .. �,},.�. -'w7 ��'v'-;) ) .� ..,sa "rc.� ; � _.�.�., „ -, •ya.,,� 4� �b �, i� .,,.v'� x I,-"a�.,«� E:�:��.� .!. -�� ;t � � 4 .t � ! �� ..Cry ` � .aa � '1-...�.� �y�_L ,�TS � �•'� !'.,`��'� y�'w...�� .;.rq -,?fl•;� � �-'"rJ � �'� �...:�,•-�1�.. }'1 :.��t;�i"'er„�. h�� v 71%� c`�.�;,� „�;�`�'; ^%r""oE4 � .�°r ,,�..f- i�°, �'� ..� ..i,.-, "-v_.y'j ,j},,,a7 '� r"5 �';34.r � �' �3�'.'7'}� .r9''`� �i-.-� j ` 1''✓J� ,%i 1�-%�-.. l/ " � { .,,,+� 3 �S' ✓ � �� ;r5 �s:��' �;;. ,,.��'•;^� '-,�9 �"3 } '3 '') , ir;•c {� j� p � ""�� , � e �c. :�..� � ; � � s •,n,� �� a ' :+�• t�.a � �:��a<z �� ,-y�„� f} � µ S.� �� u I � � �� Y i vn �� „�'�•3 (+�-✓,a_.�, 1�'' ' �9 .,�� • �'�, .�•. , p .., v� � � � .,�.� .?'� ; ,��`f l �7...1.� . �> s {''�'.''�''' ,� � �i � �'i� � � � `_! .'ti•' ;� C"� 7� "'"�ih/� .� t . "wrc�3'�ti;,�,,: :� 1 ��'Fs'c� �� ""�i �'� rJ""1°.�_ s ._ U! `�,., � .�9 ' � � - � � .� � � rvtno.tNnnoa zn�a s.t�a�s • OL�I'I� �>Ii�'I e Qf10'I� JI�IIA'Id m'I�SS.I2I� ��I�Ild'IH/AS.NRO� d>IONV o�yZ�y :s}aoda�y aanatta� `si�ode; ay� �o 'aa6ojduia uoi��e anpa��e ue st uotssRucuo� s�odat� ue;ijodo.�ay� aqy •a�ewa��e pa�euBisap �no�( �o aweu ay; y}inn ( �b �g-gZ�) i�suo�noog essi�aW �t}i}ou asea�d '6w�aatu ay� pua}�e �ouue� no�( �� `ddd - �)noap ual� suoi�e�iuntuwo� uinnpoo�'uinnpoo�;ed �� - s�aBo�{ ��ny� �� - 4osee� /�ey� 3�� - woa�S �oPIa4S �yW - paa��oyg ao� �t/W - iyooan ana�S s�uea�nsuo�� osinpy 1N�WlIf12�� 2�Ol�t/�IlNO� 'a NOIlI1�dW0� l�flQO?�d W�IOlS "� SNOISIn�2� N011b'�I�I��dS '8 SS�:)�L�� ^:�!r.�� ! c�.in� r'in��;' �inlCaf�1 'H zuia�{ paeyo�a peaw aaoQ �o(ano� ua��y aa� we� �awwnN �oae� a66n�q�a� a�we� �az��aM unnea �ap�ayo}eg uina�{ ney� aa� 'uos�aN uyo� �iey� 'uosuyo� qog s�aqwaW �yd srvoisin�a wda�oad �o nn�in�a •� SNOil��('O?�d 1S0� 6666 '8 M�In�?� 1S0� 866�-Z661. 'b' A21t�WWf1S 1S0� Wt�lJ02ld 05L l�ldd �dW '£ sl�ns�� nans Noirvido a�Nnno�woH Lss� ��lt�odfl 'Z m � ��-'�'" _ ��",�.::��'� �� 51aoda�b ti � � + :, � � � � o �j t...:� Y�`"'�� 11� � �t�,� 96Z5-9ZL (ZZ9) �d o OOti8-9ZL (Zti9) auoud i+ � +� \t ��wFL.j , r t ... 66GZ-05%59 �Iy�i 'st odeauut q} S �' �$Z - Oi�09 '� + r ty ;, �, � r 1 y� m no anuan � �,IOd,Ii� jEuOi}Eu�a�uj jnEd �uZES-SijOdEaTSLii� 1'��y3 s�� dd'�� I I °� C , � C� � �� FOR IM3VIEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Wendy Burt Wednesday, November 18, 1998 612-726-5335 Jennifer Bagdade � 612-726-8170 DEVELOPMENT PLA.� FOR MTNNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL Il'vTTERNATIONAL AIRPORT RECEIVES APPROVAL FROM MIlYNESOTA ENVIl20NMENTAL QUALITY BOARD The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) today received a Determination of Adequacy from the Iviinnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) for the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in the Dual Track Airport Planning Process for Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airpart (MSP). The decision will allow MAC to build a new North-South Runway and make other _ airport improvements. It concludes a nine-year federal and state environmental review process. i ) The Federal A�viation Administration issued a Record of Decision on the FEIS on September 23, �� 1998, the last step in the federal environmental review process. The new 8,000-foot runway is expected to add approximately 2� percent additional capacity for the airport, reducing conQestion in the national air space system and reducing delays for travelers. The new runway will run almost parallel to Cedar Avenue in a north-south direction. Aircraft will depart..to or amve from the south. The runway is expected to be operational in 2003. "We are very pleased that both the FA1A and the state environmental reviews have been concluded so that we can begin construction of ttiis mucn ne�ded runway," said JeffHamiel, executive director of MAC. "This has been an exhaustive study of the impact of expansion on the environment and our neighbors." In 1996, the Minnesota Le�islature concluded a Dual Track Airport Planning Process which evaluated the alternatives of expandina at 1ltinneapolis-St. Paul International Airport's present site or building a new airpot. The leai�lature determined that expansion at Minneapolis- St. Paul would meet the demands and arow-th of air � ravel throuah the year 2020. In 1997, 30.2 million passengers traveled throuah ;�SSP: By tne year 3010, �L�C expects more than 40 million passengers annually. y ` MINNESOTA PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL QUA�ITY BOARD � �, > r�a,,� ra. �? w;t � � � ; November 30, 1998 �l 1� � ^L.� �.�^+ � �� . - "`_`—,�� L �. � �; '� �993 _ . ...... _.. ,. � ,.,_.�, .. �, v ,� j „ _ __ _ __ _, ._,, RE: Adequacy decision for the Dual Track�Airport Planning Process Final Environmental Impact Statement. �,. .. The Environmental Quality Board at its scheduled board meeting on November 18, 1998 passed a resolution finding that the Dual Track Airport Planning Process Final Environmental Impact Statement is adequate. The EQB Board is acting on the formal request of the Metropolitan Airports Commission to assume the responsibility to make that decision, as provided for in Minn. Rules part 4410.2800 subp. 1& subp. la. The resolution adopted findings and conclusions, and authorized Rodney W. Sando, r Chairman of the EQB, to sign the following order: The Final Environmental Impact Statement, with the documents incorporated as defined in these Findings and Conclusions, for the Du�l Track Airport Planning Process is adequate. The Order was signed by Chairman Sanda on November 23, 1998. 658 Cedar St. St. Paul, MN 55155 Telephone: 651-296-3985 Facsimile: 651-Z96-3698 TTY: 800-627-3529 www.mnplan. state:mn.us 100% post-consumer recycled content / . 4 C i � � `�' ?', '1` �.,`, � �: • i■�� '�� 1: i - .,; _ ;,; � ! L �'`.,. � � } ',;. �,.' '� ,�� ! C, ,t; '� j ,' � �. � � � � : : ,�: �� ,: ❑ Agenda f�r the December l, 1998 MA.SAC meeting ,.,. . G Minutes of the October 27, 199� MASAC meeting with attac"hments , r - -- ❑ Copies of MA.SAC correspondence not included in the �perations � Committee package ❑ Blank Noise Monitoring and Information Request Form CI MASAC 1-998 Year in Review memo ❑ MASAC & Operations Committee Work Plan for 1999 memo C� Part 1 SO Pragram Pro�ess Review memo ❑ �IS Process Review memo ❑ Minutes of the November 13, 1998 MASAC Operations meeting with attachments and cover memos - ❑ Monthly Part 150 Update ❑ October 1998 Technical Advisor's Report � C � 4. 5, 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. �11Ei'ROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUt�D 1�B,4TE�fEP�T COUNCiL General Meetinp k.December 1, 1998 7:30 p,m. to 9:15 p,m. 6040 28T" Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota Call to Order, Roll Ca!! ., .. - Approval af Minutes of Meeting October 27, 1998 _ Introduction of Inviied Guests Receipt of Communications Technical Advisor's Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary MASAC 'f 998 - A Year in Review 1� Qua�ter 'i 999 Goals and Objectives Part 150 Program Progress Review (Steve Vecchi) E!S Procedure Process (Glen Orcutt, FAA) November 13, 1998 Operations Committee Report - Mark Salmen Report ofi the I�AC Commission Meeting - Bob Johnson Persons Wishing to Address the Councii ltems Not on the Agenda Adjournment � rUext r�eeting: ' .January 26, 1998 � C C MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEM�;NT COUNCIL GENERAL lY1EETING Octaber 27, 1998 7:30 p.m. 6040 28�' Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. Call to Order Roll Call j' , The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and the secretary was asked to cal�- the roll. The following members �i�ere in attendance. Bob Johnson Mark Salmen � ,. Jennifer Sayre ; Chuck Curry Brian Simonson Rolf Middleton Dick Keinz Dean Lindberg Joe L� Glenn Strand Dick Saunders Lea Kurtz Nathae R.ichardson Mirce Cramer Neil Clark Kristal Stokes Dawn Weitzel Mark Hinds John Nelson Tom Peterson Lance Staricha Charles Van Guilder 7i11 Smith Kevin Batchelder Robert Andrews Will Eginton Brad Digre John Halla Advisors Roy Fuhrmann Chad Leqve Cindv Greene MBAA NWA - NWA - ALPA - DHL Ain�vavs St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce MAC Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Minrieapolis Minneapolis Richfield Richfield Richfield Bloominoton Eagan Eagan Burnsviille Mendota Heights Mendota Heiehts St. Louis Park Inver Grove Heights Sunfish Lake St. Paul �-1AC �-i,�C FriA C� October 27, 1998 Visitors Keith Thompson Carl Rydean John M. Enger Gene Franchetz FAA FA.A Richfield Dakota County j '� a 2. Approval of Minutes � . iii: The minutes of the September 22, 1998 meeting were approved as distrib�rted. 3. Introduction of invited guests Receipt of Communications �,. Cindy Greene, FAA, introduced`Keith Thompson as the new MSP Tower Manager. Ms. Greene said Mr. Thompson has had previous experience in Minnesota at MSP and Flying Cloud and has most recently been working in Orlando. � ., The following communications.«�ere receiveci: A letter from the City of St. Paul «�as received desi�nating John Halla as the new St. Paul representative to ; MASAC. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Halla to introduce himself. Mr. Halla said he was a member of ,� � �__, � the Macalester/Groveland district council and its Airport Noise Committee. He said the committee's �= , principal concerns are the long-haui aircraft overflights, the early morning ground noise, and night flights. A letter from Joe Little, liaison to lnver Grove Heights' Aircrafr Noise Abatement Commission, was received on the behalf of an IGH resident who is requesting that a noise monitor be placeri at his home. Chairman Johnson fonvarder] this request to the stafffor evaluation. The City of Richfield presente� a resolution to the Chairman �i�hich asked that "mitigation measures be developerl for protection against low frequency noise," that the remote monitoring sites be used to measure Gweighted noise levels, as «�ell as A-«�eighted, and that the impacts of low frequency (ground) noise be studietl and mitigated on the same level as high frequency (overflight) noise. Chairman Johnson said the resolution would be addressed under aaenda item number 9. , 4. Technica] Advisor's Rumvav Svstem Utilization Report and Comolaint Summarv Rov Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, did not brief the September 1998 Technical Advisor's Report in the usual manner because of the lengthv aaenda but solicited questions about the report from members. John Nelson, BIoomin?ton, asked ho«� many da��s of the North«�est Airline's pilot's strike �vere included in t he report. Jennifer Sa�-re, N�i�, said 19 davs of operations in September �cere impacted. � C C� October 27, 1998 5 . Informational Items a) Revised Aircrai� Run-up Field Rule Chairman Johnson reported that the Operations Conunittee had studied this issue e�ctensively and anticipated that a vote could be taken at the meeting. Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor,:,briefed the members on the changes the Operations`Committee had made to the existing Aircraft Enguie Run-up Field Rule. He said the field rule governs run-up activities on the field and was lastaipdated in 1992. He said two changes were made to the field rule: �-' I_;' l. The start time for restricted run-up� hours was changed from 11:OQ p.m.'to 10:30 p.m. to reflect the change in nighttime (quiet) hours at MSP. 2. Item number 4 was changed, which addresses the preferred heading far an aircraft during a run-up, to more accurately reflect Eurrent conditions and the needs of the newer high-bypass engines. Dawn Weitzel, Richfield, asked,if the field rule covered only run-ups in the run-up pad. Mr. Fuhrmann said item number 4 addressed run-ups in the run-up pad, but included inforination about when a run-up may be performed outside the pad. � - Glenn Strand, Minneapolis, said he was concerned about making a decision on preferred aircraft headir�gs for run-ups when no noise monitoring data exists for run-ups performed at MSP. He said he was concerned with making decisions based on tests not-performed for the conditions at MSP. Mr. Fuhrmann explainerl the testing that has been done included many different types of engines that can be found on commercial aircraft, as ti��ell as on militar�� aircraft. He also noted that, although the 300° heading is preferred to contain a majority of the noise on airport property, this heading cannot be dictated forall aircraft under all �i-ind conditions. Mr. Fuhrrriann also reminded members that an average of 4.7 run-ups are performed each day �vith �0% of those at idle po�ver. He said, even at full thrust, the monitoring study found that the noise generated from a run-up during the dati• is masked by the noise associated tivith amval and departure operations. There was a question as to ��hether run-ups are allo��ed during the nighttime hours. I�1r. Fuhrmann e�cplained currently that run-ups are prohibited beh��een 12 midnight and �:00 a.m. and are restricted, between 11:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m. and bet�veen �:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. The changes to the field rule call for a change in the restricted hours. He said what some people might perceive as a run-up is usually noise that is associated ��i[h run�rati• operations. Lance Staricha, Ea�an, asked if there is a field rule that co��ers "test cell" procedures and ti�hether or not they can be .done. at night. He said. there had b�:,n a number�.of complaints from Eagan residents regarding run-up noise. Mr. Fuhrmann said he «�as unaware of anv nighttime test cell activitv on the field. � Dawn Weitzel, Richfield, askerl how air camers receive authorization for a run-up. Charles Van Guilder, Burnsville, said he had ��orked at the airport as a mechanic for many years and explained the C� October 27, 1998 procedure for getting authorization for a run-up. He said pemiission to perform a run-up during the restricted time period is obtained by MAC's Airside Operations departrnent. He said a mechanic is not alloweti to simply take an aircraft out for a run-up without getting pernussion first. Mr. Fulu�nann said pernussion is only granted during the shoulder hour time periods for specific, documented reasons, such as an early scheduletl depar[ure or an emergency situation. Glenn Strand, Minneapolis, said he would like more data to support the fact that nu�-ups aren't tal:u�g place during prohibited tunes and tliat there are documented reasons for run-ups during the shoulder hours. Mr. Fuhrmann noted some�di this information is included in the Ground Noise Monitoring Technical Study, but thaf he cou�c� provide this type of information. He also reminded members that the Operations Comrnittee has exan}ined the issue of the Aircraft Engine Run-up Field Rule e,ctensively. : ` �: _ Tom Peterson, Eagan, commented that the field rule does not address the "24 hour operation of Northwest A.irline's test cell." There was a brief discussion regarding the test cell. Mr. Fuhrmann said there is no field rule to govern the use of it. Mark Salmen, NWA, said he would bring informatior� regarding Northwest Airlin�'s test cell operations to the next Operations Committe:, meeting. Mr. Salmen also reminded members that manufacturers of aircraft engines have specific requirements for engine run-ups that are not based on theory. ~ Will Eginton, Inver Grove Heights, asked how run-up noise comparerl with noise generated from a deparlure. Mr. Fuhmiarui referred members to the Ground Noise Monitoring Study. He said _ , ,� cumulatively, noise from run-ups is not as loud as eparture operations. Yet, the noise level generated .;'� _,, by a run-up and the noise level generated by a departure are similar in loudness when taken �=� � individually. Kristal Stokes, Richfield, described the nPe of noise she hears at her home rivo blocks west of Cedar Avenue as a noise that starts and stops man}� times in a rou•. She said she assumed this type of noise was caused by engine run-ups. Chuck Cum�, ALPA, s3id she mav be experiencing noise associated w�th ta+ciing airplanes. He said ��hen a number of aircraft are lined up for departure, the pilots have to use "breakaway thrust" to move fonti�ard in line. Charles VanGuilder, Burnsville, said a run-up could be responsible for that hPe of noise, as «�ell, because sometiines each of the engines is run up separately. Rolf Middleton, St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce, restated the Operations Committee's motion. � He said he felt the motion K�as an improvement in reducing noise from run-ups by expanding the restricted hours for a run-up. John Nelson, Bloomington, encoura�c;d the public members to support the Operations Committee's motion, noted the e;ttensiveness and len�th of time the Committee spent researching the issue, a.�d assurerl members that the commirte� «�ould c�niinue to;esea�ch thE �ossibility of constructing a noise attenuating run-up pen. Lancz Staricha, Eaoan, said he thought Ehe field rule should indicate that it covers run-ups perFormed by aircraft-mounted enoines to distinguish them from Northl��est Airlines' test cell operations. October 27, 1998 ROLF MIDDLETON, ST. PAUL AR�A CH�PrIBER OF COMMERCE, MOTIONED AND GLENN STRAND, MINNEAPOLIS, SECONDED, TO ACCEPT THE OPERATIONS COMMITTEE'S DRAFT CHANGES TO MSP'S AIRCRAFT ENGINE RUN-UP FIELD RULE AND THAT IT BE FORWARDED TO THE PLANNING AND E�IVIRONMENT COMIIRITTEE FOR APPROVAL BY THE METRCIPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION. b) Noise Abatement Departure Profiles Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, � briefetl the Noise Abatement Departure Profile Trend Analvsis Report, which the 4perations Committee had directeri staff to produce. Mr. Fuhrmann said the objective of the analysis was" fo identify whether or not the close-in departure profile had been implemented by the airlines :for depax-ttures off runways 30L aad 30R, as was directed bv the Commission, through MASAC, this year. + After briefly reviewing the history and the operational procedures for NADPs, Mr. Fuhrmann displayed overheacls that explained how staff conducted the analysis: ��r (S� attachments.) Mr. Fuhnna.nn said the analysis,sho.wed that the airlines have changed fo tlie close-in depariure profile for departures off ninways 30L and 30R. He said this implementation resulteri in an average increase of 4Q0 feet in altitude. � � Tom Peterson, Eagan, asked if there was a specific reason for choosing the four aircraf-t used in the analysis. Mr. Fuhrmann said there were a number of reasons for choosing the four aircraft, such as (1) they represent a majority of the aircraft operations at the airport, (2) they are the same aircraft used in the initial NADP analysis, (3) they represent both Sta.ge II and Stage III aircraft and (4) there are too many types of aircraft to analyze all of them. Glenn Strand, Minneapolis, asked if a person on the ground would be able to perceive a decibel level reduction due to the increase in altitude and how mnch that would be. Mr. Fuhrmann said John Nelson, Bloomington, had asked that question at an Operations Committee meeting. He said staff was unable to deternune a correlation beri�,�een decibel level reductions and the implementation of the close- in NADP for rum��ays 30L and 30R. He said, in a controlled environment, one could calculate the effect by having two identical aircraft fl}� the ri��o procedures and measuring the difFerence. Mr. Fuhrmann said there might be a one decibel Ievel difference, but that the human ear can only perceive a 3 decibel level change or higher. John Nelson, Bloomington, pointed out that the 400-foot increase in altitude was an average and did not account for the aircraft that ��ere fl�ing at much hieher altitudes than the average, especially on the straight-out depariures. He said he felt it was worth implementing ttie close-in NADP because it was a step toward improvement, even if it «as difficult to quantif�� an improvement in same areas in noise reduction on the ground. Mr. Fuhrmann noted .that, althouah _The u�ark bein�_rlone.no«�.-(such..as the close-in NADP and the straight-out depariure procedure) is incremental, the combined net effect is greater than the ef�rect of one. He also noted that the FAA tower noticed the altitude differences right away «�ith the implementation of the close-in procedure, Joe Lee, Minneapolis, reported that h� had noticed a perceptible improvement in noise levels at his C C� (. October 27, 1998 home, which is on the southwest corner of Lake Calhoun. A discussion ensued regarding identifying the benefits of analyzing a new proc�iure before spending a large amount of time on it, how the FAA analyzes new procerlures before issuing Advisory Circulars, the problems�with and costs of independently testing procedures, and -concerns about communicating technical information to communitv members. c) Crossing in the Corridor ��' � 4 , Chad Lec�ve, MAC, briefed the Crossin�:in the Comdor Report. He explained that the report was the result of a request from the Cit� of Mend�ota Heights to examine if, when and how often the "crossing" procetlure was being used in the corridor. Mr. Leqve said the scope of the study, which was approved by the Operations Committee, consisted of a 6-month data. sample from November 1997 through March 1998. T1�e study focused on the 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. time period�for.weekdays and for w�kends frorn 3:00 p.m. on Saturday to 1:00 p.m. on Sunday. • _ Mr. Leqve said the report identifies when the crossing procedure actually occurred and assesseri the .., operational feasibility variables. These variables includetl an assumption that during the nighttime hours of 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. there would be only one local controller on duty. He said the FAA said this was a reasonable assumption to make. For the weekend hours, staff worked with the FAA to identify those times when there was only one local controller on duty. � �) _ � Mr. Leqve said, using ANOMS, it was possible to deternune that at least a two-minute time period between departures, off of either one or rivo runways, was needed in order to perform the crossing procedure. He noterl that the report also included a letter from the FAA that detailed the variables that ' were needed in order to perform the crossing procedure. He said the weather was also a factor and that information on the weather during this time period was included. Neil Clark, Minneapolis, asked whti• the crossing procedure �}�as beneficial. Mr. Leqve showed how the crossing procedure ma�cimizes the use of the center of the industrial corridor. I�1r. Leqve then brieferl the report's findings. The t�i•o major findings were that: 1. During the weekend hours there are not many opporttuiities to perform the crossing pracedure due � to the prevalence of departures in the 0-2 and 2-� minute time frames. 2. During nighttime hours there is probabl�� room for improvement in the use of the procedure. Mr. Leqve reported that Carl Rvd�,n of the FAA had invited himself and Roy Fulirmann, Technica] Advisor, to a meeting at the control toi��er in order to -discuss the findings and to discuss how the controllers could improve the rate at «�hich the crossin� pracedure is performed. Mr. Leqve said staff p]anned to communicate with the totiver on a rewlar basis and that a follow up analysis would be performed in 6 months. ,, i�ir. Leqve then introduced Mr. Cari Rvdeen. C � C, October 27, 1998 Mr. Rvdeen introduced hunself as the Tower Operations Manager. He said after reviewing the report, he decided the controllers could do a better job of performing the procedure. He then met with both the supervisors and the controllers themselves to re-brief them on the proce�lure and to reiterate the importance of perfornung the proceciure whenever possible. He said he felt the controllers weren't disregarding the proceclure, but that they had not been adequately made arvare of the procerlure. He said he thought there would be an irrunediate improvement. 7. Mr. Rydeen also noted that aircraft �.re not given a heading of 10�° or 11 S° but that a ground track of 10�° and 118° is what is called for: He �aid maintaining a ground track is not an exact science because of the wind variable and cautioned tlaere would not be 100% compliance, but expectect that the �.i. controllers would do better. , , _ Will Eginton, Inver Grove Heights, said he would like to see the corridor used in this manner more often, if possible. Mr. Leqve said there were a number of interests that needed to be considered when considering changes in carridor'procedures, noting that the FAA's number one priority is safety. Mr. Eginton said that was why he hoped arivanced technology, such as GPS; could help in this endeavor. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, reminded members that the Eagan and Mendota Hei�.hts Blue Fvbbon Task Force in past years had many lengthy discussions regarding operations in the comdor. „� He said the crossing procedure ��vas a recommendation that grew out of the 1992 Blue Ribbon Task Force as something that could be done to benefit both communities. He said the procedure was finally implemented about 5 years after the recommendation. He said Mendota Heights appreciated MAC sta.ff's work and the FAA's attitude and response to the findings and ]ooked forward to working with them. He said this is an example of how MASAC can function. There was a discussion as to whether the crossing procedure can be performed at any other time of day. Chad Leqve, MAC, said because non-simultaneous conditions do not occur very often during the day, the ability of the FAA to perform the procedure during this time is severely hampered. He said the report only looked at the time period when it �vas most operationally feasible. October 9. 1998 Operations Committee Report - Mark Salmen I�Sark Salmen, Operations Corruniitee Chairperson, briefed the council on the October 9'� Operations Committee meeting. The following items were discusseri: . A.ircraft Engine Run-up Field Rule o The NADP Analysis e The Crossing in the Comdor Report o An RMT Site Update a Correspondence Roy Fuhrmann, ?echnica] Advisor, updated the counci] on the status of the ne«� RMT sites. He said staff has visited the ri��o sites Minneapolis identified. He said both are at schools and staff was in the process oi setting up meetings �v-ith city and school repre�sentatives to discuss the procedures for moving foni�ard. He said Chad Leqve, N1AC, had also met �iith Inver Grove Heights and Eagan members to discuss the two sites to the southeast. He also noterl that the Citv of Richfield has not yet identified a location for their � October 27, 1998 additional RM'T site. Chairperson Salmen said the Operations Committee revieweri ri��o items of correspondenc�. The first r��as a request from the City of Richfield regarding the adequacy of the Ground Noise Monitoring Technical Study. He reportecl that the Committes discussed the City's request and deternuneci that the study had fulfilled its objectives. The Committ� also reviewed a letter from the City of Richfield regarding underkaking a low-frequency noise study and incorporating the C-weighted noise scale into the ANOMS system. Cha.irperson Salmen said the Uperations Committ� would take it under consideration when deterinining the work scape far the next y�sr. v` ->, The neact Operations Committee m�tirig is scheduled for Friday, November 13, � 1998 at 10:00 a.m. in the North Star Conference Room of the West T��esaninal. - Dawn Weitzel, Richfield, said she wa.s upset after rea.ding the minutes of the Operations Committee meeting and had some concerns. She.said she thought a Richfield representative should have been pr�sent for the discussion. She requested in the future that a Richfield representative be includerl in any Operations Committee meeting that involved issues impacting Richfield. -• -- ' Ms. Weitzel said if a Richfield representative had b�n present, they could�have responderi to some of the comments that were made. Ms. Weitzel explained that the City of Richfield felt the issue of low-frequency noise unpacts should not be ta.ken lightly and urged the council to take up the issue. � ) Chairperson Salmen said the issue �i�as not a R.ichfield issue only and that the purpose of the study in �: � question was to report on the sources of ground noise at the airport and was not intenderi to be a ground noise study. He also said that the committer felt it was improper for Richfield representatives to take a study that wasn't yet out of committ� to an outside consultant. He also noterl that the dates of the Operations Committee meetings are announced at each prior MASAC meeting and also noted in the minutes. Chairman Salmen encouraged anyone u�th sug�estions about what should be studied over the next year to bring them to the ne�t Operations Committee meeting. Report of the MAC Commission Meeting Chairman Johnson reported on the October 19, I998 Commission meeting. He said the Commission discussed the follo�ring items: 1. ComrrLissioner Himle and Commissioner Cramer reported that the City of Richfield and the MAC were continuing the process of negotiating a mitigation agr�ment. 2. A number of commissioners are becoming concerned w�th the costs associated with the Part 1�0 program and other noise mitigation prograrns. He noterl that the average cost of insulating a home h�s increased to $32,000 in 1998 and is e:�pected to be approximately $38,000 neYt year. 3. The committee votetl to approve the planned extension of rumvav 04/22 and temporary extension of 12R despite Northwest Airlines' discontinuation of some of their Asian flights. 4. The committee also received a congress�onal update. It ��,�a.� reported that congress gave only a 6- month e�-tension to the Airport Improvement Program (AIP) fund, �vhich provides funding for the Part 1�0 program. The Dept.:ofTransport3tion bil] also received a b-month e.�ctension. C� October 27, 1998 5. The Navy property at MSP w�ill be transferreti to the M.AC and the Naw w111 be moving to the other � side of the field. 8. Persons Wishang to Address the Council There were no persons wishing to address the council. 9. Other Items Not on the Asenda a, City of Richfreld �Zesolufion: Chairnian Johnson noted that the resolution would be passed along to the Operations Committ�. - ' ; , 1.1 Kristal Stokes, Richfield, addressed the council. She said the City of Richfield hoped MASAC members would support the resolution, noting that other cities would be affected by ground level noise from the ne�� runwaY- . , , . 11. Adjoumment ,. , . Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting at 9:�0 p.m. Respectfully submitted. � Melissa Scovronski, MASAC Secretary r � � Noise Abaterr�nt �r�arr�-e Pmtik (N�DP) ,�nalysis �unwa� 30I, � 30� Clo�e-In Proced��al .A�alys�s fo�- t�e D�9 Jun� 1997 � � Runwav 3OL & 30R Total DC9 Deo. Strai�aht-O�it Gate 909 Total DC9 Depa.rtures Left-Turn Gate (2$5° Headinal 1? itACSS CR�SSi) ?•:Afi � .. . :�JiI:: (:.:Ij 31L3( :JJMi:�' ; �;• o I . ' ? i �! . . . � �.r . o . . . . e • Y. . I .......____.........�......_..r..'....� ..., ....._... '_'"'� __..._ __ ............. � i � I o � �.' ca .............�. � ' I 0 0l ' � i _ .._ . .. ..__.._ .._.._. _ . .... .. ... .._ . ................. _.. ....._. _ . �) ;,.,.. ..,. , .... .... .! ]_/;A.��Y �7�Y ::i�:i .'�( :1�: ' .. j 30 of 317 (9.��/0) Pene[rated the Gate at or �bove 4000 ft. MSL Ribht-Turn Gate (31�° Headina .. iaacti :¢c�::: - ., . .. � :�71i ii (I�A.. , i1Lri' ,.�7.4i=0 (0..,:i i o� � . . . . ; \ �' : ..... - �.v. . J:J� :;iu',)r �70a :�':: ;F ;i•: �,:; Nnte: Canter vJGatt is Ltxaud 4,�iilrs Jvm rna -.� -nr, ,ti'r;tt: Cen�ar nl Gct1e u LxQ�ed �.bllles f inm the Aint nn i �� 39 of ^—.28 (9.1 �?c) Penetrated the Ga:� �t or �2 ot l6� (1 �. �—'. �70) Penetrated the Gate at or Above �-G`00 ft. NiSL Above �-t',� ft. ti1SL Noise Abatemerit Departure Profile (N.�.DP) rinalysis R.unway 30L �i 30� Ciose-� Procedural A.n�lysis f�a° i�e DC9 June 199� Runwav 30L & 30R Total DC9 I}ep. -7 1230 Total DC9 Departures Left-'I1irn Gate (28S° Headin�l 27 i.7ACK5 CiJc:cJ P-�Ai; tE�i COuei=fi (5,7.)S) iiGNt C7uvt:? (+?,::; •t• .o i �.. . . �j:'tlAil09 �i09 l;M'(i �( :A'; I::; �♦ Strai�ht-Out Gate seo t�eczs c�asse� =-c��; iEil :BUMf=ISI �tl.i:j itGili C7J11e1:5 (c� ;,) ' o . • . J .r� r ,�.� � '.t '--- o • • ti � •�' ~ G�..��`4r„f : i�.�.: ��L _ _'—_'___ _..___. e?�. �.�7 � _.__ i :�.. � . � � - • , o: �--....__._......._._._.._.._....._._..-----........._......--- .............-- _ ....i � -13 . �..,,� �i .. a ,vi]9 JEY�Ai10!1 idOY tE•4fEi ;F �Ai: �1;; ,Yore: Crnrer af Gate is Lacated S Miies jrom the Airport 366 of �40 (67.8%) Penetrated the Gate at or Above 4000 ft. MSL Right-Thrn Gate (315° HeadinQ ---- :t� raxccs c3oss�� ?-GAiC :iii CJu.Yi=:il (id.13j $ICNi C�UNt-6 (1.31) e —..._---- r'� :1, �tis.. .------'------_..._..._ .., ,, . ��Ltly. . . E . . . 't � • '• . � ' .., . r . • .;. . o , . o� • • p........_........_...r..� . .�_.._........._.....1._.._......'--.. IV al , ,o � ..._"""" • . o "...�._.._._..._.._'__"'_..........._�__......_...._ �}"' � o) 4' ..................._ _...d.._..._...............""""._.._...._..._S_._.............._. M1I oi o, _....:..._....._. . , : or.._;._...._......._....__--"'-'.._..........,..."-"'-........_ _I i -7:,�� , o , i� ):r l�!OY r30Y �:E4i.i Jf :AiE �;t) �p I Nnte: Crnter njGme ir Located 4,Niles%rom the .=.:. �prt � h'ore: Cenrer oj Gute is Locatnd 4 Milc; jrom rhe Airpnrt � ) 20 of 124 (16. I�o) Penetrated the Ga�e at or 323 of �66 (�7.1 �'o) Penetrated the Gate at or Above 4-000 ft. NiSL Above 4000 ft. MSL ,.......__ ��..:_,. v. c....,ii:.. o.-,,,,...m.- , n_-_ r I�I ,�_�_ '�-r-_ � �� .. t� .._: �. �= � ..� . 1�'' , . �_ , ; . � � ,, . . •` '- ,� I' � � ,. 1_� __ ___ , II , , . 4'• 2 , ; � : ' _ ._ _ . � �� F . �, � _, '� r . ` ,. - .. � �' �' ' :�� " • ■ � ; • III�� r .,f At '`` �. ` F;� � : _�� , � � . f � _ -.�e � ��4} }n :�' u . > . : � ` � " � � ` ",w � « �� I � t�� i 1 � ' ��, � _ . -.T :, i � f . �, � ��► T" � -, / % � �' = � � u �._.�7� / r, �'��. t y �� `, /�v 1 � �1I��I '�T� �,^;. , . �� „x ,. . f_ — �� :� :. F_ , ,�. � • . � Yx, J �I �'" . • / ��` `� ,► , � �Y- _ �.... � I , . ��. � , , � �"��.\`!._`► � � ,.� ' �a�`'`: `ar. � �. '.;_ v /`� �' �` '� � , r � � i � . �ti , = �� _ � . Q �, •. ,'.<t---,.`: � ,/�'' .� �i,,I�� ,,�,�,,,. ,. � � ;r _, _. � � � it; l�,a—�� e� a� _. -� � "- / ' 'qs u `� ,,_.. i�� ' -- •»""��, �' `�� £�. �,� � IL . , � ;� � • � ... . • . ,� , .. � � �F �� __ $ • �� $�. ¢�. ` ` � • \ �t ��p< ::.+.��-k. •� *��. yy. � ,-' �y�� -: i ` R 6& ,rt x: �p �>.. � ; ... i � a+ Y � �" � �� .`i� r` " ' � �a'' f'!{�-:'.. � T � ,•'�".y"}. �r �. " r . _... _ . ...:. _....... _. . . . . . .. � x r .._. ___,_. � .. �' , �I.�. , •► � , ., � . . t, .� ., �. I I�� / � �: . � . " -� . �� o �.r• ..._. __._ ..__ .. ...° _ ..... . ..:.. .,' . f �r � �i► � � ,� ;,, � � � _ �� • : ' . . — • � ' n" � �" . ;'; - � — . � �' :t: � . : � �.. , , ��` �, __ .l � � :� ; � � � - -� �. . �► - .T . � � , ,,,. � _ � � ��► t" �, = ,i / , . u� � � � ��'�►r / �' �; �, %: � , �, i , li:�.�� i � �, ` : �: � � , � ,.� �- _ . �,� � ��'�� . � �':" � �r�'°""� ... � ` ' �:: �_. . � ./ ��F; � j � ' � :^�� -�- ♦ ., , �,. � , . 1 � � - , �-• :� - . �� , ,. ��,. , .: ; , ,��. � �. v _�. . .., _. . � ,,�. ,� �.. � „ __ � , . � �:<-.� �� ' t. �,u, � ., ,� ' �. ,v. , .. _ ; ; ,.... ; � . _�, � , " • , , _."_ - , " . . � _ �� .- ,,, �;;� ;� , .. ,s '3 j , � . . u _ � ,i . .��...t ' � —�. , =: � — ' ; ,. — r ;�y :' :,r�" �� ; ., � � ? .E� 5P ;" : �� v .,�,�r �- ��_�. � .,:� � *�� November 12, 1998 Bob Johnson Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Cfluncil 6040 28`h Avenue South � i`. Minneapolis, MN 55450 = ' � THOMAS EGAN Moyor PATRICIA AWADA BEA B�OM9UIST SANDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Councii Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator E. J. VAN OVERBEKE City Cierk With the City of Eagan's hiring.of Jamie Verbrugge as its Assistant City Administrator, I will be stepping back from my consulting duties on behalf of the City in the area of airport relations. As such, I have also forwarded to the City my resigriation as one of its MASAC representatives. I would anticipate that you will receive notice of the appointment of a replacement in the near future. V+�I1ile I was not able to attend the October MASAC meetina nor will I be able to attend the December one due to schedulina conflicts, I have noted the January meeting date on m�� calendar as an opportunity to stop by and say good-bye. I am not placing any undue si�nificance on that occasion, but I have worked with so many people in this area for so long, that some closure is appropriate. I would like to thank everyone involved in the airport issue for their efforts on behalf of their various communities, agencies and companies in attempting to develop good solutions in a very difficult issue area. I�vish you all the best of luck and I will see you in January. Sincerely, n Hohenstein I111 S MUNICIPAL CEPJ7ER 3830 PIl.OT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 681-46C0 FAX:(612)681-4612 TDD: (612) 454-8535 � THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOI OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equa� Opport�nity Employer PAAINTENAMCE FAC1LfT`( 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PNONE: (612) 681-4300 FAX:(612)681-4360 TDD:(612)454-8535 from:ksvinBa[chelder CkyofM�ndotaHe{gh4 Fax:452-84A0 Yoke:452•7850 To:Melissa5covrwiskl To: Fax #: Re: Date: Pages: Discussion Melissa Scovronski 725-63 10 MASAC Meeting Novelt�ber 113, ! 99t3 I, including this �over sheet. Pago i of 1 W�dnesday. Nov.mb•r 1B, 1996 3:37;31 P`A i This inemo is to infar�n you tl7at Mendota Heights wil) Eie represented by Mr . Geage May and Mr. Ellsworth Stein at the DeceR�ber I, I 99$ meeting of MASAC. � Mr. May and Mr. Stein are both members of tf�e City's Airport Relatia�s Commission. This meetin� conflicts v,.�ith the C�ty of Mendota Heights' regularly scheduled Crty Coundl meeting, therefore, Mayor Mertensotta, Councilmember Jill $mitf� and myself are unavailable to attend tl�e MASAC r��eeting. Would you please infortn M� . Ftobert Johnsa�, Chair; al�out our a�pointed delegates for t}�e Decen�ber I, 1998 rneeting? ' Frwn the desk of... Kevin Badchelder City Administrator - Cfty of Mendota Heights 11o1 Vctoria Curve Mendota Neights, MN 55118 452-1850 Fax: 452-8940 C C � .. . � °, : ,� ' � � ' . . j � .' ,� � '�, ' .. ' � , ,� ,� � , , I f- ► � PLEASE COMPLETE THIS FORM AS A CCURA TEL Y AKD THORO UGHL Y,4�' POSSIBLE Date: On whose behal9' are you requesting: Name: Yourself Address: ; City Council ` Mayor �' Citizen Phone: Organization � Other Is this a one-time request: Yes or No � � Beginning � Ending If no, what is the �expected time frame for this request? to Which of the following best describes the nature of your request: (Circle all that apply) Ground Noise Overflights Run-Ups Contours Part 150 Other 0 Ov�� Please 1 , Please indicate the 1998 MASAC objectives supported by this this request:- �❑ To provide information to the MAC in their efforts to communicate changes in operations, due to construction to the surrounding communities. ❑ Evaluate departure compliance through the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor and make any necessary changes to the relevant procedures. ❑ Review the ANOMS system and noise monitors, and evaluate the need and placement of additional remote monitoring towers. Also, evaluate remote monitoring capabilities. � Reguest Air ?'ra�c Control personnel to make a presentation on how MSP operations are conducted. � Look at providing incentives to carriers in acquiring and operating factory-made Stage III aircraft. ❑ Investigate how GPS and other NAVAids cou/d help alleviate aircraft noise. ❑ Review the NADPs and compliance. ❑ Continue discussion ofPart 150 contourgeneration. 1'lease send your request via mail to: MASAC Secretary, 6040 28th Avenue 5., ' 1t�innecapolis, 11�N 55450 or fax it to :(612) 725-5310. For Staff PurQoses Onlv: Request #: Staff Contact: Date Received: Is this a Phone Or Written Request? Approved By: Approval Date: Availability: Monitoring Start Date: Monitoring Stop Date: �� Analysis Start Date: � Analysis Stop Date: Completion Date: F� f� C _ - �, � ��' =1' � • ' �I'�: MASAC Committee� Members a �IZ�IVI: Roy Fuhrmann, 'T�chnical Advisor SLT�,�E��': MASAC 1998 Year in �2eview : I)t�T'E: November 20, 1998 Staff will present a short recap of the activities, goals and items of concern identified in the Padilla Speer Beardsley report by MASAC members. Additionally, staff will briefly review each of the major items of accomplishment throughout the year. � MASAC has made significant progress toward accomplishing the goals set forth at the beginning of the � year. Each member should recognize the b oups ability to focus on the items of importance and the attainment of these goals. It wly has been a challenging and rewarding year. If you have any questions or comments please contact me at 725-6326. . k TO e FIdO1VI: SZ.T�,JECT: DATE: � L MASAC Committee Members a Roy Fuhrmann, T�echni�al Advisor . MASAC & Operations�;Committee Work Plan for_1999 November 20, 1998 At the November 13, 1998 MASAC Operations Committee meeting the committee members fnalized the first quarter activities for 1999 and developed a DRAFT schedule for the upcoming year, There �was considerable discussion about the timing of activities to meet other operational constraints and some of the activities have been carefully shuffled to meet these concerns. T'he 9perations Committee will continue- their prioritization process in December and- finalize the schedule in January for approval at the January 26, 1999, MASAC meeting. Proposed 19991iR�SAC Goals and C)lbjectives Calander ' �jec�d Date y�`�ccoffiphs� " y � .� e.:: � � - . __ . } � �qe�men�,s .. :199� ,' -�:___, , _ - -�. . - . - �:� -,- .: �P� `: _ - _ _ _ - _ : . � L i�! 4 :' , Finalize Goals & Objectives for 1999 Develop Specifications for Investigating GPS January 15 Operations Committee Landing System Use for Noise Alleviation Determine Ground Run-up Enclosure (GRE) EvaluationBenefit Criteria. January 26 MASAC Orientation Topic - Jet Engine Noise Sources with Spectrum data. (NASA Data) RMT Installation Update February 12 Operations Committee Review RFP results for RMT Installation Upda�e-on �ANOMS/RMT Integration February 23 MASAC FAA tour of the Farmington Air traffic Control Center � N � � a '.d M Projecte€i Date Accompiashing ` ; c ° � �- -. --, - -: --- ` 1� r r _ � -' Re __. � � -� � -�- � -, '�„ _, , � h ��'�.��y.w.-r' tjlllT�ffi�ffi� ' - 3 ._..:s�.2....: _..;�..""1a-y....�.er.atL,:� -s::�,.'i�7--�.�- .3:. w. .:w:'�•. ' �eii,.a.. y.'}t... _—�.:Y..�_ k' Enhance Noise Information Dissemination options. (Community Communication of March 12 Operations Committee Construction, MAC Feedback, and Operational Changes Review Nighttime Hours (Stage 2, 3; 9-11 P.M.) '�: k March 30 MASAC �' Receive MSP Construction Briefing(G. Warren) � i. Apri19 Operations Committee Non-simultaneous Corridor Departure Analysis .� - April 27 MASAC Jeff Hamiel Update�on MAC May 14 Operations Committee Evaluate Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor Departure Procedures. May 25 MASAC RMT Site Location update June i l Operations Committee Construction Update June 22 MASAC Orientation Topics July 9 Operations Committee Construction Update Ju1y 27 MASAC August 13 Operations Committee Construction Update . August 24 MASAC , Page 2 C :- I�jeciecl Daie � A�conaplishing _ , �- ; . �.... - 1999 �" . _ ��Q�g�eanents � g�.,�, . `�,�„� r � r � :�+� .� r �'w-'f,z��,,;x `as `J ; , . �.:.i-�-.er,at:: ��_�a.'�..._.s.p.,-_. ...'�.-_v•-+�Rtc�a^�....__ - - -� . . . . . September 10 Operations Committee Investigate incentives to carriers for Stage 3 A/C September 28 MASAC� Stage III Compliance Review October 8 Operations:Commi�ftee _ October 26 MA�AC ' Orientation Topics November 12 Operations Committee Focus Activities for Upcomir�g Year November 30 MASAC Part 150 Prob ess Review December 10 Operations Committee Establish Calendar for 2000 Page 3 1VI.�SAC :� '� � }�� TC�: MASAC Committee Members , FRC�IV�: Roy Fuhrmann, Technjcal Advisor SI,T��rT: Part 150 Program Pro�ress Review : DA`I'E: November 20, 1998 d Steve Vecchi, MAC's Part 150 Program Manager, will review the cunent status of the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport's Part I50 Program. MSP's sound insulation program continues to be the most extensive program in the nation. The update will cover the progress to date in the various communities and the anticipated challenges that are facing the _ Policy Advisory Committee as the program matures. Mr. Vecchi will provide additional information for a detailed discussion concerning the Part 150 Program at the December 1, 1998 meeting. 1' C� C� �� , � � 6'; E ' �� ,v �'�: MASAC Committee Members a� F12OM: Roy Fuhrmann, T�echnical Advisor S�,�CT: Environmental Impact�Statement Process Review: Dt�TE: November 20, 1998 � The issue of airport development is a multi-dimensional topic encompassing the functions of planning, assessment, funding and agency coordination. A large part of airgort capital improvements is the assessment of environmental consequences resulting from the development of an airport. In July 1998, Glen Orcutt, FAA and Mark Ryan, MAC Planner, briefed the MASAC Operations � Committee on the processes associated with the development of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The briefing covered the steps associated with the various agencies, the review procedures and the information covered in the EIS. At the December MASAC meeting, a presentation will be given by Glen Orcutt (FAA.Program Manager) and Mark Ryan (MAC Airport Development) regarding the state and federal Environmental Impact Statement process as it relates to airport development: If you have any questions or comments please contact me at 725-6326. ., m /' ;, i' k �. °�: : � �•� ' � � �' •��. ,� �� ... , � . The meeting was heid at the Metropolitan Airpo�ts Commission North Star Conference Room, and cailed to order at 10:00 a.m. The following members were in aftendar�ce: 4 Members: �� Mark Salmen, Chairman - NWA Bob Johnson - MBAA � Jamie Verbrugge - Eagan � Kevin Batchelder �. Mendota Heights Dick Keinz - MAC �� Ron Johnson - ALPA ' Dick Saunders - Minneapolis � Advisory: Roy Fuhrmann - Technical Advisor Shane VanderVoort - MAC Advisory Visitors: Will Eginton - Inver Grove Heights Jan DelCalzo Ma►�k Hinds - Richfield James Prosser - Richfield City Manager : � . RIVIT SITE UPDATE Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, updated members on the status of the additional RMT sites. RMT #25: This site is located in Eagan. The City' of Eagan has chosen a site very near the center of the indicated area. Staff believes the location will work, but will need to continue discussions with #he city. , � RMT #26: This area is located in Eagan and Inver Grove Heights. The City of Inver Grove Heights has submitted a letter to staff, which includes their three most preferred sites. Two � of those sites are outside the identified location area. The third site is just slightly no�th of the site chosen by the staff. Staff indicated this third site is acceptable, but the committee would have to make the decision as to whether the other two sites would be acceptable. Will Eginton, IGH, indicated that their first preference was to have it located north of the current #21 site (outside the identified area), indicating this location would better capture planes that were diverted to the north. He said it was possible this site is in Sunfish Lake rather than in Inver Grove Heights. Mr. Eginton said he thought site #21 was a dead zone that did not capture many flights. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, asked if it was possible to move site #21 rather than to�add,another site. Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, said it was probably possible: ;1ohr�� Nelson, Bloomington, said he didn't necessarily concur that site #21 was a"dead zone" because it was sited to capture both arrivals and departures. There was also discussion regarding horv highway noise might affect the RMTs. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, noted that there were already a number of RMT sites located near major highways. Mr. Fuhnnann reminded members that the area of influence for each RMT is'larger than what is indicated by the identified area. JOHN NELSON, BLOOMItVGTON, MOVED AND BOB JOHNSON, MBAA, SECONDED, TO REQUEST MAC STAFF MEET WITH INVER GROVE HEIGHTS REPRESENTATIVES TO FURTFIER DISCUSS THE POSITIONING OF RMT SITE #26. THE VOTE WAS .UNANIMOUS. MOTION CARRIED. RMT #27: This site is located in Minneapolis. Staff will be meeting with Steve Minn, Minneapolis, the following Monday to discuss whether the RMT should be placed in Kenny �� Park or at Anthony Middle School. J� RMT #28: This area is located in Richfield. The City of Richfield has requested and received the documentation associated with how the area fior the RMT site was chosen but has not made a decision on a site. RMT #29: This site is located in Minneapolis. The site chosen is at Ericksan Elementary School. Mr. Fuhrmann said the site could pose some challenges for a ground level installation and may have to be placed on top of a first floor section of the school. Staff has met with Sandra Colvin Roy and is currently setting up a meeting with school officials to discuss how to proceed. Jamie Verbrugge, Eagan, said staff should expect to receive a request from the Eagan City Council to place a temporary monitor west of RMT sites 16 and proposed site 25. He said although the city believes site 25 is the best site for an additional RMT, this neighborhood feels it would benefit from knowing what noise levels they are experiencing. Ron Johnson, ALPA, asked if site #29 in 1Vlinneapolis (just north ofi the end of the north parallel runway) would capture any flights. He said he thought the site was positioned such that an aircraft could not fly that direction from the end of the runway. Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, displayed overheads showing that there were indeed flights that went E � almost straight north and that did not intersect an RMTs "area of influence" as depicted on the overfiead. CORRESPONDENCE 1. Inver Grove Heights - resident request for a temporary noise monitor to be piaced at his home to measure noise levels. Roy Fuhrmann, Technicai Advisor, said his staff has been in contact with the City of Inver Grove Heights. He said the �staff has asked the city to have the resident contact them in regards to the purpose-and objectives of his request. Mr. Fuhrmann said he has not spoken to the resident at fhis time, but has a call into the city. Will Eginton, Inver Grove Heights, said he knows who the resident is and knows why he requested the monitor be placed at his home. He said the resident wants to know what the noise level is at his home. - ' Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, said staff would continue to attempt to contact the resident and would make aRangements to place a noise monitor at his home for a couple �of days. � 2. City of Rich�eld resolution #8635. The Operations Committee discussed at length the City of Richfield's Resolution #8635, ;' '� which was presented at the October 27, 1998 MASAC meeting and forwarded to the `��-% Operations Committee. Chairperson Salmen introduced the item and said the resolution's four specific requests are items currently being dealt with at a higher level within MAC. He said he felt it would be inappropriate for MASAC to take any action at this time pending the outcome of the negotiations between the City of Rich�eld and the MAC. He then opened the item for discussion. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, asked for a clarification and an update of the negotiations. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, said he has been attending the negotiation sessions. He said the outcome of the discussions is unsure at this point, but that beginning a low- frequency noise study has been discussed as part of the plans. He said he felt MASAC should be involved in the issue of low-frequency noise in some form or another. Bob Johnson, MBAA, said based on the-most recerrt-cornespondence from the City of Richfield to the Commission it appears the discussions are still unresolved. He said he thought the process should be allowed to run its course, and that MASAC is not in a position to take action at this time. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, noted that one af the concems that has been discussed within MASAC is the fact that MASAC has been bypassed in regards to � some important noise issues in the past. He said this should be kept in mind as MASAC continues involvement in the issue of low-frequency noise and at some point it will need to be discussed at the MASAC level. Jamie Verbrugge, Eagan, said MASAC should be concemed with all types of noise and didn't believe monitoring for low-frequency noise needed to be attached to a low- frequency noise study. He asked Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, if it the ANOMS system could monitor low-frequency rloise. 4, Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, said the resolution called for: the permanent monitoring of both A and C weighted values. He said in order,to accomplish this, it would take a complete rewriting of the ANOMS software and a restructuring of the RMTs. He said he thought it would cost approximately $.5 to $1 million for a new system that could integrate both. A and C weighted scales. He said this would be a time-consuming process, but tt�ought �it would have to be tied to the North/South Runway RPVIT project. He r�oted that, although there have been a couple of low- frequency noise studies at other airports in the U.S., he is not aware ofany other airport that mqnitors low-frequency noise on a regular basis. He said, as far as he knows, there is no ANOMS software package available that monitors low-frequency noise. John Nelson, Bloomington, distributed copies of three documents, which he asked be made part of the official minutes of the meeting. The three documents are: `:; 1. Pages 40 and 41 of the FAA's Record of Decision for the MSP Dual Track Airport ( Planning Process dated September 1998, which address the issue of low-frequency noise. 2. Page 2 of the MSP Noise Mitiga#ion Committee's report - specifically item number 8. 3. A copy of an article that ran in the Bloomington Sun-Current Newspaper on Wednesday, November 11, 1998 - MAC, Richfield prepare for potentia! runway suit. After reading pertinent portions of the FAA's Record of Decision, Mr. Nelson noted that: 1. The MAC has committed itself to "immediately address" the issue of low-frequency noise by conducting comprehensive noise and vibration studies. 2. "If supported by the studies, MAC will prepare and implement a low frequency noise mitigation program for the affected communities as part of an update to�the MSP FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Plan." Mr. Nelson then read item #8 of the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee's INSULATION recommendations; which reads: MAC should develop noise impact models which reflect the impact of ground level noise on residential properties. Mitigation for low frequency noise should be developed after consultation with independent noise i� mitigation experts. The newspaper article, he said, couidn't be confirmed as compietely accurate, but he thought it was important to share. Mr. Nelson said considering comments he has heard from both Kurt Johnson of the Metropolitan Council and from Commissioner Himle, he thought the negotiations have reached an impasse, but that there have been sincere attempts by both parties to reconvene discussions. � �; _� Mr. Nelson then reviewed the four'suggestions for action to be taken by MASAC. He noted that suggestion number one and; two were similar but that the f.irst suggestion is mitigation measures be developed for Ibw frequency noise and the second is that those measures be applied to residents who are affected by this type of noise. He said the third suggestion, as staff has explained, poses some complex problems. He said suggestion number four, vuhich asked that low frequency noise. be studied and mitigated on the same level as high frequency noise, was agreeable. Mr. Nel'son said he felt it was important to consider carefully the fact that a sitting commissioner far both the MAC and the Met Council were in negotiations with the � principal city. He said he feels MASAC is an advisory body to MAC and that MASAC should take its direction from the MAC. Mr. Nelson said it would probably be more damaging to MASAC to supersede the negotiations at this time. (��'� Mr. Nelson suggested the Operations Committee direct staff to prepare a letter to the city -- of Richfield that ale�ts the city of the committee's decision to hold the documents for further review and discussion pending the outcome of the various venues in which this matter is being discussed. He said he felt there was time to delay making a decision because the new runway will not be completed for a number of years. He also said he was hopeful that tt�e participants in the negotiations would be able to come to an agreement without litigation. He also suggested that, as the Record of Decision indicated, that the matter be incorporated into a FAR Part 150 Update. James Prosser, City of Richfield City Manager, then addressed the committee. Mr. Prosser enco�raged the committee �o act specifically and favorably to the recommendations that are incorporated in the resolution. He then made the following supporting comments: . The issues Richfield is negotiating with the MAC are limited. He said, for instance, that the City of Richfield is asking that the EIS address the low-frequency noise impacts from �#he ct�rrent • runway on Richfield -its�lf, �and -not on Bloomington or Minneapolis. o Mr. Prosser suggested since MASP;�C is an advisory body to MAC, NIASAC should � advise the MAC that the issue of low frequency noise is an important issue and should be addressed for all impacted communities. � Mr. Prosser said he felt it was important to note that the City of Richfield feels the MAC has shown an "absolute unwillingness" towards Richfield's efforts to have this issue addressed for a number of years. He said in 1991 Richfield identified low frequency noise as a concem as part of MAC's pianning for the future of MSP, but it was not considered at that time. Mr. Prosser aiso noted that in 1996 the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee recommended that low frequency noise impacts be measured and mitigated, which was sent to �he legislature and was agreed to by MAC. k. Mr. Prosser said the resolution's �ecommendations/suggestions were reasonable and practicable. He noted that in late 1997 Harris, Miller, Miller and Hanson (HMMH) undertook work for MAC on the issue of low frequency noise at MSP. He said their work included a map of the low frequency noise contours and recommendations for impact criteria. He said the third step would have been to identify potential measures for mitigating low f�equency noise impacts, which was notycompleted. . Mr. �Prosser then displayed finro maps, produced by HMMH, that_ show the potentially impacfed areas associated with the new runway (see attachment). The maps show the 90(dBC) through 80 (dBC) contours , for both hush-kitted and manufactured Stage III aircraft. � � Mr. Prosser said negotiations between the MAC and Richfield only address the impacts to Richfield for the new runway and reiterated that low-frequency noise is an �� issue that affects other communities, as well. He said MASAC should address this issue because it affects more than one community. Mr. Prosser then answered questions from the committee members. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, asked how the City of Richfield requested and obtained the documents associated with the HMMH study. Mr. Prosser said the city requested them under the Govemment Data Privacy Act. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked Mr. Prosser if he could make a suggestion as to how the committee could proceed given the fact that if MASAC were to apply pressure to the Commission, as he suggested, MASAC cor�ld be looked upon as "insubordinate." Mr. Nelson said he was concerned with the timing of the proposal because of the ongoing negotiations. Mr. Nelson specifically asked how Mr. Prosser viewed MASAC's relationship with MAC. Mr. Prosser said he feels MASAC is an advisory committee responsible for advising the commission through "unfiltered" information and recommendations. He said MASAC should let the Commission be concemed with the politics of the situation. He said he didn't feel taking action on the resolution would interfere in the negotiations between the city and MAC. He said adopting the resolution simply lets the Commission know how MASAC views the issue of low frequency noise impacts. � John Nelson, Bloomington, then asked Mr. Prosser how he viewed the Commission's '� pledge to "immediately address" low frequency noise issues included in the Record of Decision. M�. Prosser said he had a problem with the credibility of the statement because he feels if the Commission wanted to address the issue, they could have continued the HMMH study. He said he doesn't feel there is an "organizational or institutional" commitment to address the issue. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked Mr. Prosser what he thought about the suggestion that the issue be addressed in a FAR Part 150 Update. Mr. Prosser said he felt there were a couple of problems with incorporating a low frequency mitigation plan into the Part 150 Update. Ne said a Part 150 Update would only take into consideration current conditions, and that Part 150 funds will be spread even thinner if low frequency noise mitigation measures are included in it. ' - Mr. Prosser also said the MAC has stated that low frequency noise is not an impact that needs to be mitigated. � � John Nelson, Bloomington, a'ske'd if Mr. Prosser would support MASAC recommending to the MAC that a low frequency noise study be incarporated into a Part 150 Update. Mr. Prosser said the city wouldn't oppose that action, but prefers low frequency mitigation measures be treated separately in order not #o have to compete for limited Part 150 � funds. Bob Johnson, MBAA, said he didn't feel MASAC should be involved any more than it has to at this point, considering the negotiations currently taking place betwesn the MAC and �� _ � the City of Richfield. � � , Mr. Prosser said MASAC shouldn't "walk away" from the issue simply because it may cause problems for MAC or for MASAC. He said he thought the MAC hadn't completed the HMMH low frequency study because they knew it was going to pose a funding problem. Dick Keinz, MAC, reminded the committee members they had only heard the city's interpretation and had not had the benefit of hearing from the Commission. He said only the negotiators have all the information and advised them to proceed with caution on this issue. Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, reminded the committee that there are currently resolutions from other cities that have been pushed into next year and that need to be addressed. He said a number of issues have already been identified for the next year, with some that could spill over into the following year. He also reminded committes members that only one airport has beer� approved� by the FAA #o fund low frequency mitigation measures. He said they received this funding through their Part 150 Study. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, said, although MASAC could not ignore Richfield's request and should be involved in thc issue at some point, he feels the timing is 0 inappropriate and urged caution. Chairperson Salmen agreed and reiterated that MASAC would continue to be involved in the issue. John Nelson, Bloomington, suggested staff draft a letter to the City of Richfield acknowledging receipt of the resolution and outlining the committee's discussion, being sure to mention that the committee was deferring action on their request rather than rejecting it. Mr. Nelson also said he felt a Part 150 Update was the best vehicle for pursuing a low frequency noise study. He said including it in a Part 150 Update would allow for both an in depth study and for metrawide abatement measures. He also said he felt he didn't have enough data at this time to take action on the resolution. � Mark Hinds, Richfield, encouraged the �committee members to support the resolution, but if they did not take action, he asked tha�� staff begin researching how much it would cost to ovefiaul the ANOMS system and to conduct a low frequency noise study at MSP. Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, said what Mr. Hinds asked for would be time consuming for MASAC and would require input from each community ..as to what they would want from a new system. _ John Nelson, Bloomington, said that although Mr. Hinds' suggestion was reasonable, it was pro6ably preliminary because it is unknown what the outcome of the negotiations will be at this time and again urged caution. BOB JOHNSON, MBAA, MOVED AND DICK KEINZ, MAC, SECONDED TO HOLD THE RESOLUTION IN SUSPENSE, DEFERRING ACTION ON IT UNTIL SUCH TIME AS IS APPROPRIATE AND TO SO NOTIFY TNE CITY OF RICHFIELD IN A �ETTER. THE VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS. MOTION CARRIED. Jamie Verbrugge, Eagan, asked what MASAC should do if the matter is litigated between Richfield and the MAC. Chairperson Salmen said legal counsel would have to be sought to determine the legal ramifications of MASAC taking action. John Nelson, Bloomington, said he hoped the matter could be settled out of court, and that he would more likely want to wait on taking action if the matter were litigated. 1999 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES DISCUSS/ON Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, reviewed . the memo to the Operations Committee regarding the work plan for 1999. He noted that items 10-14 are action items that staff must complete during 1999. He said items 1-9 are items that have already been identified as topics for consideration. Chairperson Salmen then asked if committee members had additional items for consideration. Kevin Batchelde�, Mendota Heights, said he felt items 3 through 5 are especially important to include in the work plan for 1999. He said, not discounting any other suggestion, the nine items already identified were more than sufficient and would need to be prioritized 0 accordingly. Dick Saunde�s, Minneapolis, said the Minneapolis members had taken a two-step approach to identifying areas for consideration. He said they first prioritized the items outlined by staff in the memo and then identified additional items. The following are items the Minneapolis members identified for consideration: 2. 3. 4. Q 6 7 8 Begin ground level/low frequency noise studies for all communities. This is Minneapolis' highest priority. ; Begin the process of a Part 150 Update, which is also a priority. Discuss how noise level data from AT10MS can be incorporated into the Part 150 contour generation. � Seek MASAC's support for a public health study to be conducted by the appropriate state agency to research the long-term health effects of noise on humans, especially on senior citizens and child�en. � Implement the Noise Redistrifiution �Plan outlined in the 1996 Noise Mitigation Recommendations. Increase the credibility and value of the Noise Complaint and Information Line. Review how information and how much information is distributed to MASAC members. Produce a quarterly report for distribution to other bodies and to be made available to the public. Bob Johnson, MBAA, said he thought a review of the nighttime hours should be included in the first quarter of 1999. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, said there is popular support for this �'' � initiative. He also reminded the members that the Twin Cities Airports Task Force has �__ . asked that the nighttime time hours not be changed and that the original hours of 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. be �einstated. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, asked why investigating GPS for noise alleviation needed to be addressed this coming year. Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor, said it was important because there is a very narrow time frame (18 months to 1 year) for decisions to be made regarding how GPS technology will be instituted at airports. He said MASAC will have to make some decisions this year if it wants to be involved in the final specifications. He compared this opportunity to being asked to help develop the Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADPs) when discussions about this issue were taking place over 8 years ago. John Nelson, Bloomington, suggested the committee place the identified items into three categories: action, research and evaluation. He said an action item is something that advances or promotes noise abatement for either an affected community or for everyone. An evaluation item is a review of an existing operational activity. And a research item is an analysis of the potential feasibility of making an item an action item. Mr. Nelson then categorized the 14 items �isted in the memo. The committee then discussed and prioritized the items, focusing on solidifying the first quarter's agenda. It was decided that the remainder of the agenda and additional items will be discussed and finalized at the December`11, 1998 Operations Committee meeting. The E finalized �rst quarter agenda and remaining draft agenda will be presented at the December 1, 1998 MASAC meeting. � John Nelson, Bloomington; said he thought the Operations Committee should be sure to bring an action item to the fuil MASAC body at least once per quarter. The next Operations Committee meeting is scheduled for December 11, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. at the West Terminal North Star Room. The meeting was adjoumed at 12:45 p.m; �, Respectfully submitted: , , ;, Melissa Scovronski, Committee Secretary �� . T ' � t � . , , , �'� : . ,� _ w, �� • ;,= ; ., MASAC Operations; Committee Roy Fuhrmann, T`echnieal Advisor RMT Update � November 5, 1998 � MAC staff has visited four potential. sites for additional RMT installations�scheduled for 1999. On November 2, 1999, staff ineet with Councilwomen Sandra Colvin Roy, Minneapolis, to discuss the Ericsson �Elementary School placement. Future meetings are being scheduled to work out additional issues. A meeting with Councilman Steve Minn is also scheduled for November 16; 1999 to discuss „ the Anthony Middle SchooUKinney Park location. Two potential site locations to the southeast of the airport have been identified as well. Eagan city staff _. has selected a location just south of LeMay Lake in a park, and MAC staff was asked to identify the ( � location for site 26. At this time a location by Argenta Trail, in Inver Grove Heights, appears to best '" suit the criteria set forth by the Operations Committee for RMT placement. Staff will provide additional information, as well as detailed site maps at the November 13, 1998 meeting. November 4,1998 Ci ty Of INVER GRCJVE �EIGHTS ; Chad E. Leqve � ANOMS Coordinator Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs Metropolitan Airports Commission 604L `�Qth Atrn��Q South Minneapolis, MN 55450 : 9 � Dear Mr. Leqve: Thank you for contacting us re�arding the site of the ac�aitional noise monitor for the northern part of Inver Grove Heights. Our Aircraft Noise Abatement Comrnission met to discuss potential sites for the monitor. Following a briefing by Will E;inton on the discussions with Eagan, we reviewed our objectives �nd determined that the circle center site you prefer does not fulfill our need to accurately monitor the overflights using the 105 deb ee heading. As vou know, we believe the "no fiv zone" south of the centerline extension of runway 1?R forces, by FAA reb lations, alI southeast flights from the north parallel runway 12L to divert 15 deb ees. This puts hundreds of flights per c�ay on the exact same flight path because no flight can be routed south of 105 deb ees. The e;cisting RMT sites do not adequately monitor the noise from these constant overflights, nor does your favored site. The sites we prefer are: 1) 6350 �r�enta by the cellular phone tawer ?) 6a�0 South Robert Trail by the cellular phone tower. 3) 60th Street, west of Robert Street , 8150 BARBARA AVENUE • INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, MN 55077-3412 TELEPHONE (651) 450-2500 • CITY OFFICE FAX (651) 450-2502 • POLICE FAX (651) 450-2543 � C � �; • t • • � Q�� , � �_ � ;, � � ''1, . .: MASAC Operations Committee Roy Fuhrmann, Technical Advisor Correspondence f: November 5, 1998 At the October MASAC meeting� Joe Little, Inver Grove Heights ANAC Staff Liaison, submitted a request by Mr. Fred Krueger to have MAC conduct noise monitoring at his residence. Mr. Krueger � lives approximately 8.5 miles southeast of Runway 12R, just south of the centerline. Staff has spoken to Mr. Little about Mr. Krueger's request and has asked Mr. Krueger to contact MAC staff to discuss the purpose of the monitoring. As of this date, staff has not received a call from Mr. Krueger. The closest ANOMS RMT to Mr. Krueger's residence is site 22, approximately 1.5 miles from his address. Staff will attempt to contact Mr. Krueger before the operations meeting to gather additional background to his request. 0 �. C 10/12i98 3SON 17:20 F:�� 612 450 2502 IN�'ER GR01'E FTTS CITI H.9L C�'jt)ol �, � J.'t 5 �{, � To: Fax #: Subject: �ate: Pages: e � CITY O� )NVER GROVE HEIGHTS i, MASAC Secretary 725-6310 : � Request far placement of an aircraft noise monitor October 12, 1.998 3, including coz�er sheet tt�essage: Enclosed is a copy of the MASAC f�oise Nionitoring and Information Request Form. Listed on the form is the name and address of an Inver Grove Heights resident, Fred Krueger, who wishes to have a noise monitoring device placed at his home. In the case that the address is not legible on the request forrn, it is as foliows: �dtr. Fred d{rue�er 259 3 96�' Str+e�t East Inver Grove Heighis, tl�innesota 55077 Please keep me updated on the status of Mr. Krueger's request. if you need any additional informatian, please contact me at the number ar address listed below. Sincerely, Joe Liitte Staffi Liaison • Aircraft Noise Abatement Commission City of Inver Grove Heights � 8150 Barbara Avenue Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 612-450-2569 Fax: 612-450-2502 10; 12%98 ?!(ON 17: 20 F3T 612 4'a0 2502 _ INl'ER GROi'E AT5 CI1'I' $AL ,. . i � / • . i •' • / ' / /' ,�� . Date• --� /�—�� On w�ose behalf are you requestin�: Name: ��,c � . — �NA,t.. �TAFF L�.4r��'ourself Address: -r��,�.n �,��,E, �f��NTS (�rrr �1 City Council a ` , Ma ar ��,� %iA�ltA2A J`t �FJVUc� Y T,v �c,P �-,Po�-�...NT� �'iAl �, Citizen �� J,P l � t: 2 Phone: �s�� Organization U�fJ" — �� . � Other 2 Is this a one-time request: Ye or N'o ' If no, what is the czpected tira�� frame for this requ�st? Brginning Ending to Which oF the follo�ing best describes tbe n�ture uf your request: (Circie alt thst �pply) G our nd Noise Overflights Run-Ups Contaurs Part 150 Other � PLEASE W�KFTF DUT YOUR REOUEST HERE �NI3/t�Ft AT?"AC��NY LETTERS 4R r T1� � 55C3� 7 f�ve� Plea.�e (�i. ��-' � 10/12/98 '�ON 17:20 F�T 612 450 2502 IN1'ER GRO1'E HT5 CIT� H.9L Ptease indic�te the 199� I�SAC obj�ctnves suppQrted by this this r�quesi: To provide information to the MttC in their tfforts to cnmmanicate charrges in opera6ons dve tn canstruction to the surrounding carnmvnities. . Evaluate departure compliancs thraugh the Eaga+r/Mendota Heights Corridor mrd maJEe arry �ecessary cha»ges to tke relevant prvicedarres Review the ANOMS system and noise monitors and evQluate the need arrd plactment of vdditionol remote manrtoring towers. Alsq evoluate remole mo�itoring capabilitres � Requesr �ir Tra�c Control p�rsonnel to madce a pr'ese�tation on how MSP op�rations ar� conducted. � Look at providing incenlives to enrriers i� ��ring vnd ope�atrrrg jactory-made Stage III aircrafi. ❑ Irrvestigate how GPS and oiher NAVAids cvuld htlp a1leviate aircraft noist. ❑ Re►�iew rhe Nr2DPs arrd conepliarree. ❑ Cantinue discussion ojPart 1 SO conlour generatien- ,E'leas� send your �eqtaes8 via �al te�: I�A�A� �e�ret��, b040 2�tb �ve�eae �., t�i�r�ecapodis, �.�I SS�SO' o� jctx i� �a :(612) 725-63�10. #: Staff Contact: Date Received: � Is this a Phone Or Written Rez�uesi? , Approved Hy: � _. � Approval Date: Data Availabiliry: �4oeiitoring Start Date: Moa�itoring Stn� Date= �,4n�alysis Start Dau: 'An�ysis Stop Datc: � I Compleiion Date: 2 0 C�j oos , 0 . I. � STATE OF 11�lNNESOTA ) ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss ) CITY OF RICHFIELD ) I, Thamas P. Ferber, being �he duly qualified and acting clerk of the City of y� Richfield, Hennepin County, Minneso#a+.do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and exact copy of Resolution No. 8635 and that the same is on file and on record in my office. Given under my hand and seal. this Z�th day of October , �ggg. � Thomas P. Ferber City Clerk City of Richfield Hennepin County, Minnesota , RESOLUTION IVO. 8635 RESOLUTION REQUESTING 1'HE iil1ETROPOLITAiV AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNClL TO DEVELOP A NIITIGATION STUDY FOR LOW FREQUENCY NOISE IMPACTS � WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) was formally incorporated in 1969 with the goal of reducing aircraft noise, as weil as increasir�g public knowledge and awareness of the issue; and WHEREAS, MASAC is responsibie for the study and evaluation of existing noise abatement policies and the proposal �nd initiation of new programs, thus requiring that all council members be well informed on a wide range of noise abatement procedures and plans; and � ' ;< . WHEREAS, the current levels of ground level noise (its major component being low frequency noise) account for Qver half the complaints the City receives on a monthly basis; and � � - �� WHEREAS, Richfield has repeatedly requested that MASAC address impacts of low frequency noise on communities; and WHEREAS, studies have proven that construction of a new North-South Runway located two blocks away from dense residential development will have a significant adverse low frequency noise impact on Richfield; and �"�� . WHEREAS, this runway will be located closer to residential property than any runway recently constructed in the United States; and WHEREAS, several independent studies support the need for mitigation of low frequency noise; and WNEREAS, studies have demonstrated that low frequency noise produces levels of annoyance which require mitigation; and 1NHEREAS, the Baltimoce-Washington International Airport has included mitigation of moderate levels of low frequency noise impacts into its Sound Insulation Program; and WHEREAS, at high levels of impact low frequency noise cannot be mitigated using noise insulation methods currently'utilized for protection against averflight noise. NOInl, THEftEFORE, BE 11' RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richfield, IVlinnesota, as foliows: 1. Mitigation measures be developed for protection against low frequency noise. 2. That residents are provided protection against impacts of low frequency (ground) noise. 3. That the remote monitoring sites in neighboring communities measure C- weighted, as well as A-weighted noise scales and are included with monthly informational reports. a � G, - 4. That low frequency (ground) noise impacfs are studied and mitigated on the same level as high frequency (overtlight) noise. . Passed by the City Council of the City of Richfield this 26th day of October, 1998. ' /' " Martin J. Kirsch, Mayor AT1"EST: Thomas P. Ferber, City Clerk i j PLEASE CO�fPLETE THIS FORMAS ACCURATEL YAND THOROUGHZ YAS POSSIBLE ND A TfA CH ANY LETTERS OR FORMAL RESOL UTIDN.� Date: .� �� On whose behalf are you requesting: Name: Yourself Address: City Council t/ Mayor �� . Z Citizen Phone: � ' Organization ; Other i: Is this a one-time request: Yes or No ' �g �g- If no, what is the eapected time frame for�this request? ��_ � ' � IWhich of the following best describes the.nature of your request: (Circie all that apply) Gro d Noi e } OverfIights Run-Ups Contours Part 150 Other PL EA,SE WRITE O UT YO UR REO UEST HERE AND/OR A TTA CH ANY LETTERS OR FORMAL RESOL UTIONS. � �l ` I C� ,. � �� i�%7► � :/tj .� i►L _ �I � �iu �� . �, - � � �`. �% � L�!. . �►1a /' � i � Li I�/l�� - - .�...� �' __ Over Please _ � , FAA REcax� oF D��iS10ti MSP DUAI TRAC7C A#RPORT PLANNING PRQCESS included in ttw c20D's a�;achments. The attachments also include se<<eral detailed responses to IZichiield's co�.ments on this issu�--�pe�ifical.ly e AEtachment �.1—This attachment indudes responses to two general comments: (1) the impacts of 1ow frequency noise were not adequately addressed in the FEIS; and (2) the FEIS did no� proz-ide mitigation for sio �icant adverse impacts due to low frequency noise (see tn� resporL�es to General Comments 1 and 2). Attachment A.1 also includes re5ponses to all of the written comments on the FEIS submitted by the City of Rich�ield, oF �ti�hich se�-�ral addi ess concern� about low frequency noise. • AtEachment :�.2—'I1-u; attachment isra copy of an appendix submitted by the City of Rich.Eield alcn� �tizth i� FEIS.comment letter. Parts of Attachment A? address low frequency noise issue�; and this infor'mation, as well as other information, was w. considered �� the FA� and M.�C in preparing this ROD and the at�ached responses to co�.ments. ' Aftachment C—�ttachment C con��ir�s addifional comments on the FEIS filed after the deadline for commen�. This information was received from the City_of Richtield or interest�d Ri-hfield �arties and pertains primar�ly to low frequen�� noise issues. Al�;�ough no� le�ally required, the FA4 is induding this attachment, incluaing F_�..4 responses ta �hei.r co�ments, in order to update readezs on the status of the low fre�uency noise considerations. As noted above, the com�lete responses to the City oERichfield's concerns about low , frequency noise �e found in Attachment A.l, and are particularly addressed in General (; Resporues 1 an : 2, as well as within spedfic responses to correspondence received from - • RichEield in At�chments A.l and C. While the FAA and the MAC are not Iegal�y requirec�to further inves��at� the matter of low frequency noise impacts, nor to provide for mitigation, the M.AC has proposzd and con�uts to immediately address the issue.� Specifically, the MAC is will.ing co canduct noise stud.ies and vibration measurements to identify the existence, if an�-, of perceptible vibration from low �equency noise. Such studies must be done in a comp.�hensive manner and with the involvement of all potentially affected communities, in.: tuding �e City of R.ichfield. If supported by the studies, MAC will prepare and implement = lo�v fre�uency noise miti�atian program for the affected communities as part of an upda� to the'�iSP FAR Part 1�0 Noise Compatibility Plan. The end result of such a mitigation pra� am would �e to offset any impacts of low frequency noise that would not be miri�ated br .omrentional sound insulation trea�nent pro��ided for under the existing MSP I�oise'_vlie;ation P; :n. With tne techni.�l guida.nce and �sistance oE the FAA and others, the subsequent studies will, among ot�:�;. thing�, underta.ke necessary ��ibration measu.rements in Richfield and other poten�al areas :a assist i:-� doc.-um�ting the existence of perceptible ��ibration impacts due to existinp or plan_ ��d operations at �iSP. Althougn there is no established state or federal standard of si�_acance :ar low frequency noi�e and vibration, guidelines for judging human perception of ��ration 1=�-els have been published in several different foru.ms, and may be , '-$ �ow �;=quency no.-� has airea:y been iderr�ied for araiysis and patentiai mitigaUon in the adopted MSP Noise Mitigation P1an (se� Appendix � � tne rEIS`. 40 IS �r-_�.;t2.�) FAA RECOqO OF QECtSKIN MSP OUAI, TR,1C}( q�qpppT PUNNING PA6CE$5 considered.=9 If supported by the studies, the MAC will prepare and implement a low frequency noise mitigation program for those affected communities as part of an update to � the MSP FAR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Plan. The end result oE such a mitigation program would be to offset any impacts of low frequency noise that would not be mitigated by conveniional sound insulation treatment provided for under the existing MSP Noise Mitigation Plan. � - Hig�,.,Forernsf Se�zsitiuiiy Analysis and Noise Impacts. As previously noted (Section I�II.A of this ROD) the FEIS also inciudes a sensiti�ity analysis to disclose the potential noise impacts of the M5P 2010 LTCP and the 2020 Con�ept Plan based on a higher range of aviation activity forecasts, conducted at the request of the FAA. This analysis considered the noise effects that ,, could occur f=om a forecast of hiaher ai�eraft operations in these two time frames, as described in Section III.A of this ROD. Based upon the MAC High Forecast, no significant noise impacts were found for the proposed action. The contours resulting from the 2005 base and 2005 hi� forecast scenarias are reasonably,eguivalent for the DNL 65 contoui, with differences mostly occurring in azeas to the south of-the airport. The 2020 DNL 6� contour is slightly smaller than for the 2005 65 DNL contour.at these higher forecast levels. For rnore�information, see Appendix H in the FIIS, including F aaure H-1 (various other noise contour maps are also preser,tted within FIIS Appendix J). � - � Noise Mitigation Plnn. In Apri11996, the Minnesota Lea lature directed the MA.0 to develop a noise mitigation plan for the proposed action of a new north-$outh runway. In October of that �` year, the MAC adopted the plan (FIIS Appendix B), which included elements regardino sound insulation, community stabilizafion, aircraft operational requirements, and other matters related to airport noise effects and improvement funding. IIements of this noise mitigation �� `; program aze underway with the noise insulation program being the most evident measure in �` eFfect. The noise mitigation plan is the means that will be used to mitigate noise From the proposed project (for more information about the MACs ongoing and planned noise mitib tion measures, see the discussion under "Noise Mitigaiion" in Section �I.C. of this ROD—Project Background). Parks and Recreation: Within the airport boundary, the Runway Protection Zones, and the DNL 65+ noise contour, them are 10 parks and recreation areas. Bossen Field, Lake Nokomis, L}iamond Lake and Todd Parks are located under the jurisdiction of the Minneapolis Park Board and used for active and passive recreation. Taft Park and the Rich Acres Golf Course are administered by the City of Richfield for active recreational activities, while the River Ridge Playground is a small recreation area approximately one mile frorn MSP in the City of Blaomington. Fort Snelling State Park is located on both sides of the Mississippi River and portions of the area are adjacent to 1�iSP on the north and to the southwest. A nine-hole golf course, which is a part of this park, lies within the existing DNL 65 noise contour. The Mississippi National River and Rerreation Area, stretching along the River and including a portion of the Minnesota River, is mostiy owned by other park agencies and the MDNR in particular. The Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge (MVNWR) provides habitat for a variety of wildlife and also provides wildlife rea�eation areas and environmental education 29 MAC couid elect to use me cnleria reccmmenced by �e AcousUcal Sociery of Amer�ca in Gurde lo the Evaluation of Human E�osu�e to Vb2tion in (! °,, - 8uildings (ANSI S3.29-1983J as weli as research ure=rzken and pubiished by Harvey Hubbard (No�sa tnduce� House Vibrations and Human Pe�cep(�on, '`�, Noise Control Engineering Joumal. Sep-Qct t 982). rcr mcre inlormation, s2e General Respcnse 2 in Attachment A. i. 41 (SE?r!,aeE� � 998) On October 28, 1996, the Me!r.opolitan Air.00rts Commission approved the foilowinc noise mitioation program for Minneapolis-St. Paul lnternational Airport; " INSULATION � 1. The residential sound insulation program for the area encompasse� by .the 1996 DNL 65 contour be completed on the currently approved schecule; � 2. The prograrn be expanded after completion of the current prcoram to incorporate the area encompassed by the 2005 60 DNL; 3. The 2005 60 DN� contour be based on the most accura`e projection oF � tra�c levels and use of appropriate ANOMS data; �. MAC and aft'ected cammunities seek approval from FAA to d�velop � neighborhood and "natural boundaries" that reflect current conditions at the outer edge of the,expanded contour to the maximum extent possible; � 5. Prioritization of ttie expanded program should be �to initiate single-family homes upon compietion of tne currently approved schzdule, and beain wor� ,, on the folic��inc ��ewiy eligible d�rr�llines/ouildings, beqinning witn th� i-tich��; �oise exposurz Iev�Is, in accordanc� �vith a schedule aor�ed upon wi�n � each afrected city — multiramily dwellings, nursing homes, churcn�s witn � rzgular weekday daycare/nurszry school types of operations; o. ihe p�vor�rn ce �unded by a comb�na;io� o� FFC rev-n;,��s, 2;;;;;�� ;��, internally genzrated �unds, and te�era! aid, �r�iin esiirnat�d total anc a�r,�Gl costs as summarizEd below; to the extent tnat MAC canrot ;�rd this expan�ed proaram in a reasonable period or time, suppor �rem the State of Minnesota should be sought. In no case should unr�im5ursed financial impacts fall on s��ected residcnis or their local governm�nts. � i. The Metropolitan Airpor�s Cornmission commit to �undino its commur:t•y based noise ab�tement program on an accele�ated basis beyond its currzrt levei o� S25.5 million 2nnually. � * 8: M�,C should develop noise imoact models which rzflect the impact of ground level noisz on residential prope�ies. Miiigation for low frequency noise should be developed atter ccnsultation �riith independent noise mitigation experts. 9. Completion of fhe sound insu!ation program is contingent upon tha MAC maintainino a bond rating of a; le2st A. ��. COMMUNITY STABILIZATIO�y The Metropo.litan Airports Commission shou�ri participate with aFected communities to identify and quantify any impacts the airpor-� may have on. declining property values and/or other negative consequences an neighborhoods near the airport. To the extent that negative cons�quence� can be .quantified, a Working Group should prepare recommendations to �'v1AC For consideration by the Minnesota Legisiature. Community stabilization meas�r�s considered should include, but not be limited to, the measures described in the M'etropolitan Councii-MAC Comrnunity Protection Report. The measures inci��de purchase and property value guarante�s and housing repiacement to compl�ment fhe tax credit and revitalization area legis(ation adopted in 1996. A Work�ng Group should be convened including representatives from MAC, Met Council, Northwest Airlines, aFected communities and legislative stan. Tne � � � r m � � � 0 Z �:. � � N m c � m � m � � _ U c � � � 0 Of C O O m • � i ; ��'e::x�.r°;,,; ':0., � y � ii 4! tC .�u G 'cj � y •W � � •� C ' � �a �: � v ;� y t10 � ;.a � ,a�„� ... � � . � .0 � ""'' d .� '-' G •Q = .= � o o �° � 3 F" a�-i C C o C� y C o m ci �^ oC� [�+[�'-� Gc..'.' o��a aa � U �+. v Q %. 7 R. y 6) cC �,,, 67 61 ,,,,�a � y O..'..]' dJ O.' ai a' o�.0 G� 3^� � �,m.� � �m.� �> .ia pl ��, •• � y � 67 N+� y[ �� O N p •`' � U p � "' ^ 1�.. � ,� ..�a � b c... U 'O � '" . � � �+•� � 3 � a �� •� �,^ c m ; ��. U'�-oUwa[i3m a�o°mi�'a3ia�i � a^"oo ,.a +•Oi � �� L; L:. ..5", G GL yd„ •v�I > O O C!� 61 rZ C 40 � .0 . � �' y U ,.�.� v �' ..0 � C �. � '''' y � � C � C c.i +� � c� � � � ... C ..� C. at a� � � ;; •~ cs. C �, � W G ,... ca > .:. ,a o m � � , o��" d� o'�y y.� �� c°..° as �� m u, � � °� U � � C rA .�., C � C. � tu � � c.. � .0 . c•^ ��. 3 at „ c�' G-„� b d.� ac Q, °'� � �..; G.7 m[x,GE�-� m.x �U a`°i � Q oq a�3 C y� m� a�i "n �o�E � � � ''� a�i a U � :� � m '> v�] � > U •�� E � �'3 .a�' a as ew a�i y�� o .-. ca cC � iYi 47 � C1 �� r R! .� r-�y tn ,C O.,m p 61 ^+-�„ U ia A�.^,� m.a -u y �, q a hp a.� �'}�' 4. F. .... N .0 p U.L" =_� .... �' ts0 C � m m m.p a ��" o C1.C.�'(� C� �'�,O .0 O ►� �q C'" � .0 ''"' +' Fa ..,�' C ,a�a �j � � c�C» O y •C �"'p C""..0 G' � '� � 'i"' N C��i W � ,� �q 67 U ,^' y � � C7 a a.'^" .�'� ^� 'C 4! � .� A y 4 �J �'-' °�. � > "� � °'"-�.c�3 maaa��-d.rim�o° �z4`U� �`-C+ t31 � �tl '�d C � � Uya1 C. O � � r"'� ;� '� ' � � .F� r" �Ci a.�a"i�3m �.o^o�",�.�m�o ^o�o�y O -� -n.,ya "O S� Fn " �.. � Gl U � CO a . � �. -� ,,,� '� �:i C;,9 C� � � J.. �G pC� � �"� '�' �" •� 'U „�^„ v C RI ,,,�,, .� y i"' m y t"" I'+ ,a.�a CI •�.S �.L,+ �.�i b C. � "Q ...�.� � t,� • Q� .s= .0 .0 C. T .�.� GJ �e° ��" � m ��.... � o�? ca �•�0 3 0 �^cJ a� � G-`�i .�.+ . � G. m y' .'� O. o U.� a� -�' U7 C'.-.� L. � ° �f� �^oti�.�;at o o� °� 3� o �" 3 �� y� c. o� cC •., � C o. s. �p G�, --01 �� at .� w m O .� � OJ V � t"" � �y 'u� 1.. � 27 n4 .-m• � � �� .� � y y � � � U °.' ,� � � �6,, � ,d o � � ,; � � � � ro G � 4. �,� ia ,,. tol, �"' �p '+a �y �. .0 � C � y � [ �+ .. i„ ..» : c�, c. � � c°� � � .�. '" a� a .c G � � v � �' �'�'��c.3r."�.� �:�`o o ai � ° � +' o ^o ,D " '� � S � � °� 'a .• aGi m �'� . � � o � .0 vi � e�: , m u. t.. � � � � , � ..�''. � � ^7 � ' ,��' d G � G A . y � � � .R. tiA'U � � C Ll d m `� � o m o ��.a m -.�.°! o� ° �-� � ��{, 5o u � :N 3 n� ,., y q�,-�, 3�C.� �;' �°' a� ��.n o m�., � .� ... � C�''"' ^� �" 'C �`.� .� , � . C� a L "O ? d y O � p '27 � U � m �tr1 a1 "" � "C .;� �.�. t`N' O ci y ^L7 � 7 4: �.. a� c. U .7}" � � � � ` . � � •� � � U � �.a+ c.�'i � M o ��„ '� `,�4 0 � �.°."�� .° �� o• ° � � o' c t�.. •� ..�; � 3q�,� na,��.`n � m�¢ s d�� a�i.3 �`° a� 'O .^ •v .�u � m y�,,," :�a '�„" • 0",� p �--�''� � tm � 4�+ � �..�» 0. C � -a .� [ c. -� � � •� � � �, '� a t, B ;a ti `'. ,9. a� .� a>�� .0 �y °'al w3. � t^�'. 3 0 � �, "n � � �> `o � �• � ,.,,� o .� � � � y � . U � O 't7 �q .CO y �G� d. O ��mm�' �o°1•a�-^t�n:.:,�U.,o°;U�ca.°�' �"" ^' .0 C. � v�~ � v t"" �� C. q O i.. •� � O.b CJ ^� .° •.. �, _ a'° d � ti � � °' '� .t0" �' m m .� � a° c�,,,o .�.N��ma o�a�C�a�, _•o�o; C O CL �v U c. aa .3 v1 ��+ t"'3. G 3 �.w�i .^. �.�. � G !� a'' N � .�-. .0 � I.+ � L" q • � U � ,- � y U 000—.y ��o3y„�� Q.:.,�0� , G •a U „p [ � U 4. �.^C1 � +� . � '`�' � ��. 41 � mQ G� m ��.�� a"��o� � a •�j � ��, a p ' h0� � .�.> .c1 yj F aj � C � .y c,..,. . . ' � � .ii. .O� . p . � .a m Qj � 'w'' � U ^�' � O y '� � � � U p�j"' ti�R... � �..^..� cC >`O"�. �' �.''�.:�y m ' i� �i.d ::i �Q �i � ir m {y �. � + q .ti � Q � � Q � � :�,� �] O p7 � y U y oI O .0 .� � y � � �. 3' � -i'��f q �F RS �, y . . . w � � 0 bA ' O' c� C C O�� 'b. m.. � N � . v1 p�' m c.t"'^.. U� C�� p m,.� �.. a i c.� �'„ � ;.d �.0 'y^ N O O.... CJ d O i.. �� aici ��OmcaCc�oc'�°, �>�ti°3a�i�a`�ic�i`' U�.°2tw3° m. o....,,�c�.�.�.�awc � „ a Q,...., �, ,� a� �,, .- w _ � 'm'G �.� .-, C> � ,�" t.�. .� hn �" � c. U a� •^ .�: � q� m � �,,,, � -� CL � — � `'", � � � ti a� .� � � � � � .� .� rn o >, �p^ �� ` -[ v� .0 O �^. `�...' ai •C �- �" ,�,'- m cy � � �" a7 p N'" a`Z'" a� .y N.� C» � O �" "d aUi� �..i ;_, m s c.� U� GO m �� C p ��'' ,.�n C ��,.J� cJ ^� C�.E� � � U "'�" � � C m .� L�+ �O � aa � ..�., G1 �Qd� � a� ~y ^� C7 .:a y d aUi � +, c» Q s. a�`°� t10 f.. ':7 'L7 C cC •l.. y C 0�3-0� o3Qo� �i°O�� '�-' �vI ^� �, c o�„... c�, m o�•� � p m '� y .� �:, .a � � .a i � "� Q C 3�� O qy> ,711�1 L. .n.i 'O y �' •� ... ,� Cq ~ Ci ��3_. U C7 �' U '�, � - u; � C " m 0 o y__ .c: �,� w [ a> Q � C . a) O v h(1 x .� E� � � ai "o .-. w N .� a.a > � O :� .aa•. � hq U ,�r d � •� . � O �� °p v a ^�" d ..a e G. y, q a 4°' � 3 � � v �U y w � -� o 0 0� � � �a o, ¢' � 'a'�Q �> U C�� O C' �"" :A U '^'y �Q >�. � f"' (y fU - cy � _ v� � � `' '`C Gq � '� ^ � y m��[�y .� Q � Q � ��Ci,, '� n 'U q p a":� 3 aia c��Q o � o _ rn �^ -- •.. .-� ' ,...� a1 G. c� ."..0 � � � � '� � � ^.� ��.7 � � ~ ^O .:� 'C7 G''" o q � o � G p •Q v U � O �a�:�o� �� ca.o 3•�,�m o �� . ''' cp � J .. � q � � . � � � .� p � � . t� '.� � o o aUi� � � o o�. "�� m �' O CC N -- y y�'j G''+ G c a� m 3�� >; � . o q m � C � C�. ^L7 y ��QO� � d � � � fU +-i F'+ O � U .� .'7 : F�i -o U � � +.+ J 4 � . � � 4 � r-Mr � , . ra v] c�i �.. - O� U � � ... � o �� . a�x � . .� j.. o m . � .� � CCC+I Q, 0.0 . i' U l i..� . • cc! � � N� y,�,� ' . G � �� `. - .. .� "O > . . af �y. �' . , [ 'C7 cC .0 � . � '� � "� � .. d � y � . : � � �' ^v o C m •.:. � � �a� � � � . ,. o .o� � : •'. . a��; ��,' a. � �., �n a� .: ` o a c� C:� o� �.J•. a.., 3 m � _.. ,• � .. .� �: . [ p �.0 �•.:� o m a�i .� � O : � �� y�+:� ..i". COQ' �D O �'�'�.C.a � +a.[� C:. . �"Ciai".,p y� °�' � .., �y �,, a � _. p� r. a� ►'+ o°; c`�. � vI 'O .� � p Q -u .. 6�i a�i a�i q'.. p Cn ?.; � :. � � `�'. �� ._ q.3•.�•�2 0 o}., c» w O CL - U � � � . � '0 � � � CA C. U � �w d O , � ,� � . . C «f y � S� c� 6T � � � � � �+� -u -' .'�i o N > � � . . � L�. V �aA F ',�^� - r�., , �C'. � .�: � h` .= L". d . . N "" q CS � � � � .a� G L" ...Ni F. pl � , � o � � a� � n� Q�w��.� �_ o �� .-c' N C -o a.a ,� i.� G Cn v i,r - � d .n O � GS. :• �. Q � � � y q tn , � G o, 3 o q_ �� cn .._, t� o o.� �� U • ,'� ' ^ C � o C � .O1 � . : ' � (,� �' a� n � c7. '7 . � a� �� n a1 i: y. � b � � o - ,e � y y� � � � ^� � � � � �. .-. tin c. ' `. � -- ..a .°n a� � `� ° n 3�� _'�c� .'�'''- m>°.,,'a�+ . �'� � .' � o�..- o � �.tr � � � � �� o a o� o c� „�� c� y Cq ?� '� � E" .^» �i [ � ^'" rj 'CS tn .,.,,. c W �1 � .,, � � ¢7 �.-. . C7 • � O _'�_, � G � � . _ '-� ._ .- '^ C: ti J 7 i� � Nigel Finney has confirmed that next week is fine for the be�inning of the work at MSP. An MAC employee will help with the tower. You should call Roy Furhman ( 612-�25-6326) to set things up. If you are unable to reach him directly, call Dick I�einz (612=726-8134) and tell him your needs. Dick will pass the word on to Roy '� ____ who will take it further. Attached are the proposal I sent to �igel and the worksheet that I used to build up costs. The budget for the measureuients and analysis is $67,000.. Let's talk about the pro�ram as soon as possible. NiGel will let me know.�"whether we will do this directly with MAC or through HN7�. I will then set up_a "� o�,,,b number. Andy .. , � �n -�". _ � , � : �i '` `ji . 27 October 1997 �--�� j � � � � � (� ' �� i . ,� �� t ;} � � � � �-� 2 6 -S�Z�� iZ T. � �• H�4RRlS 6LLER I1�ILLER & F1�4NSON iNCe 25 New England Executive Park Suriington, MA Oi 803 TeL (61 � 229-p70� Fax (61'� 229-7939 i .t.�' ;�� ---�-s��-t.�-�.�- Mr. Nigel Finney . , Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South - Minneapolis, NLN 55450 �� O � 2 �� `� �c � � Originai by U.S. Mail, Copy by �'AX (5 pages) �: _ SUBIECT: Proposal Concerning MSp I,ow Frequency Noise P9'7-20140 - - ; Dear Nigel: �; j As I anticipated in my memorandum of 9 Uctober 1997, we have prepared a proposal to � consider potential impacts of low:fiequency noise at MSp, miII�ation of those impacts.and potential noise impacts at Iocations on or near the extended centerline af the new runway, such as the VTC properry. This letter presents the proposed scope of worl and estimateci costs for the work This proposal takes the 9 October 1997 memorandum as its point of departure and provides additional detail about the proposed approach. It addresses four sets � of issues: (1) predicted levels Df low frequency noise in Richfieid due to construction and usP of runway I7-35; (2) apprapriate impact criteria for low frequency noise; (3) identification of potential measures to mitigate impacts of low fre�uency nozse; and (4) potential noise impacts on properties on or near the extended centerline of runway 17-35, such as the VTC property. � TAS� DESCRIPTIONS Tas�: l: Derernune Locations of Low Frequency Conrours at MSP — For the reasons described in the 9 October 1997 memorandum, HI��I proposes to develop contours of Iow frequency noise for runways at MSP. Th� contours will be based on rneasurements of aircraft departing from runway 11R-29L. Ti�e measurements will be of single-event levels at seven locaaons on or_near MSP. The proposed locations are shown on the atzached figure taken from BBN report No. 819b. They are marked "1," "4," "A „"B,,, "C," and "D." Two new locations will be at distanc�s from the runway similar to BBN sites 1 and 4. ' A" is betwe�n BBN locations I.and 4. `B" will be about as far to the south of ti�e runway as BBN location 4 is to the north of it "C" and "D•° v�,ill b� �out 5,000 fe�t abe,am the runway at about the same distances.from the.tbreshold as sites "A„ and "1 ". These locations will define the reduction in noise level with increasing distance, The final location will be "E". Its locauon is to he analogous to "D" on the opposite side of the runway. Comparisons of leveLs at "D" and "E" will allow us to estimate wind effects on the measurements. ' ��. ♦ � � �. k '� ..� � • ..' _ V NiQel Finnev I7 October 1997 pa�e � We need to identify levels from Scage 2 aircraft and from Stage 3 aircraft since their lov�� frequency characteristics differ. Vi�e want to have at least 100 good measured values at each location for each stage of aircraft Based on the current level of operations at MSP, we estimate that we might be able to obtain this number of values during two days of measurements. Adverse weather conditions might reduce the number of vaiues we can obtain on any day and increase the requi.red measuremcnt period At the outside, obtaining these data should require no more than four days. For this reason, we have estimated costs of data ac,c�uisition based on a range of two to four days of ineasurements. � •G � To untiertake the measurements, we wil� need to have three people working together. One of the people will be an observer in the?ATC tower who will keep an accurate log of operations on runway I 1R-29L and any other ogerations that might conflict with the noise measurements. (We will need ta have access to the tower for observauons.) The second person will be a backup observer. The third person will tend �e noise monitors. Whi.le two of the geople should be fIlvinrlH employees, the backup observer could be fram the MA.0 staff. We have estimared costs for this work with two F�MIv��Ei personnel and also wirh three. Subsequent to the measurements, F�VIIvTH personnel will analyze the noise measurements and develop cantours of low frequency noise based on the measured data. The contour va.lues wil c.�rrespond to the values recommended during Tasb 2. While the primary purpose of the low freqnency noise analysis is tc� evaluate potential impacts of low freouency noise from ogera.tion of runway I7-35, the contouts will apply equally to other runways at MSP. �:[Mt��ff3 will prepare contours for all runways now.at MSP as well as for niawa}� 17-35. Since the contours for Stage 3 aircraft will differ from thase for Stage 2 aircraft, it will be necessary to consider how to apply the contours. Specifically, we will r�commend when to use the Stage 2 contours and when to use the Stage 3 contours. We propose that the contours deternZined during Task 1 be presented in a meeting at MSP. T� technical work can be described in a brief technical memorandum or, more fully iri-a more _ fonnal report. We have estimated costs for both fornss of reporting. _ Task 2: Recommended Impacr Criteria for Low Frequency Noise — A.� I said in the 9 October 1997 memorandurri, it appears that it is appropriate to consider the onset of potential impacts on residentia� Droperties as a C-weighted level of 80 dB. (This level, originall, est�bIishet3 for SFO, is confirmed by the BWI informatian.) We propose thaz HM[Mfi document fully the reasons for the proposerl impact criterion. We have estimated the level of effort and costs tQ pr�par.e a deta�led report. Task 3: Idennfj� Potential Measures to Mitigate Impacts of Low Frequency Noise on Residential Properties — � The purpose of this tasl: is to identify potential measures to mitigate the impact of law frec�uenc�� noise on residential properties. HM:IvI�-I will evaluate a range of potentia] 1/Ui,1iUb " � _:� ; . �.. E� ., � ,. � . . .. ; , � . I7 October 1997 3 measures, ran=ing frorn modificatians of sound insuIation mettiods to use of barriers. The area over which measures wiil required will be identified during Tasks 1 and 2. The � product of ttus task will be a set of basic recommendarions for consideration. It does not include detailed desi�n recommendation, such as design of a barrier. Task 4: A.ssess Porenxial Noise Impac�r on Properties on or near the Fxrended Centerline of Runway 17-35 — � F; i While the noise contaur analysis that has been developed for the EIS describes noise exposure on land uses surrounding_.,MSP�;in ternis of the yearly average value of DNL, there are some land uses that may be particularly sensitive to noise-induced vibration. It is appropriate to estimate the Ievels of noise-induced vibration at locations such as the VTC Pr0Pert3'. ��is task, HMMI:i prop,�ses to estimate levels of noise indnced vibration at the VTC properry and at other similazly situated and simiIariy vibration-sensitive properties that you identify. The levels of vibration will be estimazed frorn �e noise measurements proposed in Task l. We propose �a visit to the properties as part of this ta�k. we have estimated the level of effort to undertake this work and prepare a tec}inical memorandum presenting the results of aur anatysis. � COST ESTIMA7'ES We have estimated the level of effort and cosrs to comgIete the four taslcs. T�Ze estimates aze based on our standard consuiting rates and are by task. Task 1. Deternzine Locunons of Low Frequency Conrours ar MSP - As noted above, we have estimated the level of casts for this task with several alternatives. For eaeh - alternative we have estimated a measuremer�t period of at least two days, but not more than four days. The esti.mated costs are as follows. T�sk v�'ith 2 HMMH staff and a brief technical repc�rt ... ......��9,500 -$56,3Q0 Task with 2 �Qv1MH staff and a detailed technical report . . . . . . �SO,OOq - $67,000 �' Task with 3 H��LMH staff and a brief technical report ........$42,SQ0 -$61,000 Task with 3 HIvTME3 staff and a detaiied technicai report ......$53,000 -$71,300 :�. Task 2. Recommenried Impact Criteri.a for I,ow Frequency Noise – Estunateti cost �8,SQ0. Task 3. Idenrifj� Porential Measures to Mitigare Impacts of Low Frequency Noise on Residenrial Propenies — Estimated cost $11,000. . Task 4. As.ress Porential Noise Impaczs on Propenies on or near the Extended Centerline of Runway 17-35 — Estimated cost �12,Q00. ` :: ,. . . : H��ts �1t�.t��R ��.�R � ��4�sot� t��. , Nioel Finney I7 October 1997 Paee 4 These costs are hased on our understandino of the issues and the level of effort required to accamplish the worl: involved. I trust that this proposal is responsive to your needs. We � are prepared to begin on the work as soon as you re�uest us r.� do so. Although I shall be at the ANOMS User Group meetings in Oakland on the 2Q `�and 21 tt I will plan to call you on the 20th to review this proposal, � , �: Sincerely, . . . k � . � . . .. H[ARFLIS MQI.LER MILLER & HANSON INC. Andrew S. FI ' : � � '� Chaisman Attachrnent: F�Qure showing measurement locations C:lazim97-121.WPD C�� m . I-IARRIS MILLER �II.�ER & HANSON INC. 15 New England Executive Park • Burlington, MA 01803 � Tel. (781) 229-0707 Fax (781) 229 7939 EmailforAndrew.S.Harris aharris�hmmh.com MEMORANDUM T(�: Nigel Finney cc: Roy Fuhrrnann ; : `, FROM: Andrew S. Hazris � SUBJECT: Initial Presentation of Low Frequency Noise contours Minneapolis-St Paul International Aisport Low Frequency,Noise,Study HMaVtFi No. 295340 , ' � DA'I'E: 14 January 1998 Introduction � The MAC and Richfield have discussed potential impacts of low frequency noise from '� operation of a new runway,l7-35, at MSP. In the absence of adequate information on the levels of low frequency from MSP operations, F�VIl1�H proposed to measure noise from ex.isting operations and develop noise contours based on those measurements. Because the level of low frequency noise is best represented by the "C" weighting network on a sound level meter, measurements were conducted with C weighting.l As proposed, FiNiMf3 began development of low frequency noise contours for operations at MSP by measuring levels of noise from operations on 12R-30L during the periad from 5 November 1997 tluough 7 November 1997, three days. Two H1VI:NiE� staff inembers were assisted during the measurement prograrn by staff from the MSP noise office. After completion of the measurement task, ��VLi1�II3 evaluated the measured noise levels and developed contours showing C-weighted noise contours in the range from 80 d8 to 95 dB. In this , memorandum we present the contnurs developed during this study for your initial review. Contours are presented for thrree groups of aircraft: (1) stage 2 aircraft; (2) new-technology Stage 3 aircraft; and (3) older-tecY� ology Stage 3 aircraft �[IvIIvLEI recpmmend: `iiat the MAC base its analysis of potential low irequency impacts of runway 17-35 at MSP on the 80-dBC contour from older-te�hnology Stage 3 aircraft. ` During work on a separate task under this project, F�V;QVTH determined ih,at it will -- recommend that the MAC consider a C=weighted level of 80 dB �as the thr�shold r.,, � for low fre�uency impact on residential land use. (This other work will be reported separately.) H�4RRIS IUIILLER I1niLLER & FiAtVSON INC. Initial Presentation of L,ow Fr uenc Naise contours Pa�e 2 Description of Measurements � H�'�-i measured noise from aircraft operations at seven locations. Figure 1 shows the measurement locations. The specific locations of ineasurements differ somewhat from the location initially anticipated. However, the measurement loca.tions met the goals for a range of distances and an opportunity to deternune wind effects on noise propagadon. Another goal of the measurement program was to obtain l00 measurements of Stage 2 aircraft operations and 100 measurements of Stage 3 aircraft operations with data at all seven loca.tions for each operation. Qperations were on runway 12R for ati measurements. The three_day measurement period yielded measurements at all seven locations and there were more than 100 operations by eaeh stage of aircraft, However, a combination of interfering noise from operations on parallel runway 12L and temperature-related measurement problems at certain measurement sites reduced the numbers of good data points at some sites. The numtier of good data points R,as {u1�y �� t H�,iIVgi to draw noise contours and'have confidence in the acccuacy og the contours: During the measurements, �[NIMH me�sured wind direction and velocity so that we could � assess the influence of wind on the measurements. This was desirable sinc� noise levels are higher during downwind conditions and airport neighbarhoods tend to experience downwind conditions frequendy. Measurements were available during downwind • conditions at all locations. , � � �� Measurement Results � .._ . Ba"sed on the measurements, HIVIl1t�i observed that the noise characteristics of aircraft departures at MSP fall into three groups. The firstgroup is Stage 2 aircraft (i.e., B727 and DC9 aircraft). These aze the noisiestai�rcraft at MSP. The second group is new-technology Stage 3 aircraft (i.e., B737-300 and B757 aircraft). These are the quietest aircraft at MSP. The third group is older-technology Stage 3 aucraft (i.e., hushkitted bC-9, DC10 and - IvID80 aircraft). This last group is quieter than the Stage 2 aircraft but not as quiet as the new-technology Stage 3 aircraft. Whi1e all three groups of aircraft are nou, pr�ent in large numbers at 1VISP, FAR Part 91 mandates that the Stage 2 aircraft will disappear by the yea�. � 2�00, prior to canstrucdon and use of runway 17-35. Noise Contours �gures 2 through 4 show C-weighted noise contours from ogeration of runway 17-35 for the thr'ee groups o€ aircraft identified ahove. Note that the contours have shapes similar to other single-event noise contours. The distance frorn the runway to the contour depends on the noise produced by the aircraft and tbe aircraft elevation angle. The'contours aze not P�el to the runway. Since the Stage 2 aircraft should be out of the fleet when runway 17-35 becomes operational, we recommend that t�e AgEs,C iden tify potential low fret�uency impacts on residential azeas by using ti�e $0 dBC contour for older-technology Stage 3 (�� aircraft. Figure 5 shows the recommended older technology Stage 4 80 d.BC contour in I-�ARRIS MILLER MILLER & �iAP1SlJN iNC. Initial Presentation of Low Frequency Noise contours pa�e � � comparison with the 80 dBC contours for Stage 2 aircraft and new-technology Stage 3 aircraft. It aiso shows the BBN low frequency 75 dB maximum contour. While we aze canfident that the 80 dBC criterion is appropriate and [hat our noise contours accurately show the 80 dBC contour location, we are not able to evaluate the BBN recommendation or how BBN developed the low frequency 75 dB maximum contour. BBN's report does not describe fully how they went from their measurements to the low frequency 75 dB maximum contaus. From our knowledge of aircraft noise, we do not believe that a low frequency 75 dB contour would be parallel to the runway. As an aircraft accelerates, the level of low frequency noise generated by the engine decreases. Further, as an aircraft leaves the ground and begins flight, the noise propagation environnient to distant locations improves. These two physical conditions cause contouts ta get closer to the runway as an aircraft accelerates and further from the runway as the plan begins actual flight The contour eventually�closes as the aircraft gets farther above the ground. We could probably get BBN to,explain how they develoged this particulaz contour: However, we would like to have you review this memo before we try. ._ A further point of consideration is potential differences in mitigatifln measures for the SO dB C criterion and BBN's low frequency criterian. The BBN criterion is for frequencies at or below 100 Hz. The 80 dBC criterion covers a broader range of frequencies. While the 80 dBC criterion contour tends to cover a larger area than the low fi�equ�ncy 75 dB contour, it is probably easier to reduce t�e C-weighted level than it is to reduce levels at frequencies at or below 100 Hz. We have information on sound insulation improvements relative to G weighted noise. We will need to see what information we can find on sound insulation improvements relative to noise levels at frequencies at or below 1Q0 Hz. Requested Action Please review this memo and consider the implications of�application of the twa criteria for low frequency noise: 80 dBC and low frequency 75 dB maximum. I evill plan to call you on Friday, 16 January 1998 to review this issue. D:�ADivnAdm-97�ad97-140.wpd i �� , , . �ARRtS MILLER �ILLEFi & 1-�ANSON INC. 15 New England Executive Park Buriington, MA 01803 Tel. (781) 229-0707 Fax (781)229-7939 �' � ! To: Andy Harris HMMH From: Eugene Nf. Reindei � ; Date: January 21, 1998 � _ Subject: Updated MSP Low Freq. Contours Reference: HMMH Jab No. 295340.01 � Andy, Here is the package of e�chibits y,,ou.requested for the MSP Low Frequency Noise Report. Please notice that the five figures of the prelvninary report are included and have been updated as I noticed a few errors when I was putting Table 2 together and describing the development of the contours. The errors found were: 1) The energy averaged values associated with the measurement sites were incoaect (some were average values, not energy average values), and 2) The directivity of the C-Lmax was not consistant in the database determining the contours (some calculations were for a directivity of 130 degrees and others were 140 degrees;130 degrees is correct). Number one above is obviously a major contributor to the contour definitions and therefore the contours changed. As you will nodce, this correction had the effect of moving the 80 dBC contours out a bit and producing a lazger dispazity from the BBN criterion 75 dB low hequency contour. I have plots that show how closely the contours match the measured data; even better than before with the corrected informafion. Take a close look at the figures and ihe other exhibits you requested and if any questions or concerns arise, please get together wiih me to d�scuss them. I should have caught these errors earlier than ns�w and feel bad that we almost gave the client bad in.formation. I am confident in these new contours since they match with the measured data so closely. � Table 1. Summa of Downwind Measurements Aircraft Noise Stage Number of Downwind Measurements by Site � A Stage 2 73 5� C F B 58 71 44 'Old Technology" Stage 3 � 7 15 15 19 i6 'New Technology' Stage 3 28 31 17 � 39 20 Table 2 Summa of C-wei hted Lmaz.Level Measurements Aircratt Noise Stage Aircraft � ` �� . . . rgy Averaged G.tyeighted Lmax l.eyels b Stage 2 'Old Technolog�' Stage 3 °New Technology" Stage 3 DC9 72� ?37-200 �� All Stage 2 MD80 DC10 747 Ali Stage 3 "OT° 757 A300 73�-3Q0 F100 BAE146 All Stage 3'M' I 98.9 101.1 97.5 99.4 98.0 962 101.3 96.8 90.1 92? 88.3 932 � 8 2 94.3 , A � 94.7 100.5 952 98.5 95.8 93.0 99.1 96.4 88.1 87.1 87.3 4 824 88.0 66 18 28 y Slte C;::; �F � B D 88.5 96.7 gg g 8 8 89.0 98.1 100.0 882 �`.7 828 93.7 83.4 88.6 96.9 99.6 87.1 �`�` 92.4 94,9 g4_1 83.0 89.9 922 82.3 88.4 9fi.1 96.4 86.6 86.1 932 94J 84.5 80.0 882 89.9 83.3 80.8 86.5 89.9 79.4 �.9 �`.7 WA 76.9 81.0 87.9 892 81.1 �.6 ` �.9 87.8 82.1 8�.0 86.9 89.3 81.4 • . .�-, . �' -" ,.� o nn..f4'sS� t�• C-weighted I�inax Contour Deierrr�.ina�ion for ' '' � � � -� ,, � � .. The contours were drawn using the energy average of the measured data in Table 2 for each aircraft type (noise stage). It was determined that the C-weighted Lmax ]evel (C-Lmax) was measured when the aircraft was down the runway past the measurement site at an average direcdvity from the aircraft of 130 degrees during downwind conditions. The fdur measurement sites along the 1500 ft sideline were utilized to determine the change in C•Lmax as the aircraft progressed down the runway. A thira-order polynomial fit of the energy average C-Lmax at each site for each noise stage of aircraft was-i3eveloped in order to produce an equation to describe the offset (from the level measured at site A; the reference level) measured along the runway. The next step in developing the contours was to use the energy average measurernents at the further out sites C and D(approximately 45i}0' sideline) compared to the measurements at sites A and B respectively to deternune the propagation of the C-Lmax levels. Here we assum�d that the level drops 3 dBC as the distance doubles or 201og(distance) along with some air absorption per 1000 feet of distance. Using the reference levels at sites A and B, the pmpagations at C and D were determinesl. This process showed ttiat the air absorption coefficient changed as the aircraft became airbarne; most aircrafc were still on the ground when the GLmax level was measured at site C and airborne at site D. Therefor�, the air absorption ccefficients used for develaping the contours degended on the distance down the runway of the aircraft. .. The contours were generated by developing a spreadsheet with a matrix of locations sideline to the runway in a density of 1Q0 ft square sections. The matrix started 500 fY. sideline to the runway and proceeded out to 10,Q00 ft and starte�i 8504 ft behind the start of the runway and extended to 1000 ft beyond the runway, F.ach 100 ft square section of the matrix generated a C-Lmax level by deiermining the aircrafi location when the GLmax would be measure� at that scction of the matrix (130 degree directiviry assumed� which determined the distance from the aircraft (r) and ihe position of the aireraft aiong the distance vector r intersecring with the 1500' sideline, assigning an offsei from the level measured at site A using the polynomial equation, assigning an air absorption coe�cient (a), and solving the following equation: C-Lnax=,, = Reference Level (Site A) - Offset Levei� - 20�1ag[r�/1900'J - c�'x) '�jr�/1000'J � where 1900 ft is the distance from Site A to [he aircraft when the GLma.�c occurs and 1 �00 ft is required since the air absorptian coefficients are ger 1400 ft of distance. The above process generated the curves sideline and offset by 130 degrees to the runway. 'This process also showed where the curves began to curve in toward the ruwa3+ center-�iHe�behind the runway. 'Ti�e 100 dBC Lmaz curve was able to be closed on runway centerline since it was so close to the runway, The •• other curves were closed behind the runway by assuming a 3 dBC reducdon in level per doubling of distance (20 log (r)). To extend the contours beyond.the end of the runway, the INMS,Ia program was utilized to prnduce A-weighted Lmax curves for four different aircrafc types (DC9, t�gp� '757, and 747- 200). These A-weighted Lmax curves were then used to detezmine the shape of the contours �eyond the end of the ruway to bring the curves in ioward t6e runway centerline. �'� o�^a. r�.r �..o r'-ZUn \. i (i . � � � ..�/1 � _ : � �, �Ild�� , I � .�%`., 1��ili1B�� .; • � � j . ��1/�i�'� , ' ��i► ��, �,�� : �� i1��-� � ti�lis��/�� :��t��, � !��1� ; � �►;��'��@��'; ��s� ; �t�� F J; . ��,�J � � - �: o ��'�- � � ��y`y� _ �.. _ _ �� ; .� --.�� .; .. ��:� ► . : e��:�� _ _._,� I_ '�-��' � �� ; � ��►��i��;�i�� : i � : , ��,'�� i �' ��d.�l��,.� , ��i` ��,� i '� ��►'i�►'�"` '' ' ��x��r�� , ; ��0��' , „ f� �`��i = �J��CA�� Hf;=�� 'F : : �_ �. : , . : . : . . : ; ;- r:�.:.��;:';� � :I1�ISP Proposed � 494 = � ! _ ,s�` �-- r ,, . . - :: Q - �s, ;:.� ::,. 1�Torth-S�uth .R..ur�way �--- � � � � � � �� 1 � : , � ! �;�:� - - L�na� d�3C �or�tol�rs ,;... ...��-:;. - � � ) . � � �A� ��Older Technolo�- �� . � . � :�;:�: _ . . � : �.. : O `• µ •� . ;� . . . . ' J. . . � . ( . ! . .. �' , �\ . r ... � �t ��D S HAI�OPEE �� ROA D ! � 1 _... � I � . b � Sta�e 3 1��rc��.ft �� ,�'� .f' .- ; `� Y7` ."]• �i� . f �^'�'"��; ��C��l� Y.• i'.5....1,. -��;:� �r _ ��. v::. - . .�;�=. . . ��, . A .. � X f: '::;:� �..\\ ,, ,J`. \\�. - ,'\\ � i _ ,\ � � �% , �, - - - -- --- - -. -_ _- ,, - . ^ - .;�� ;-� � :, ; :� ; � � � � � � � � � � ' ' � � � � � � � LA�:� NOKO1ViIS ��1 �� -; ; --� - -- � � (�;1 tT vi . , '-�"T ' �. � ' ( I � ( � � i �. - . \ .. �_ 1,\`�}.'_'i- - . I;iI? 1�I� �L i� 1I � ;'i..r_.,.�.�•f �-( • •, ' ..i !. � �� . i � i � � _ ' I�^ . * +\ �—I_" . � � �. �;,�i i � � � -13 5VV �-�.�.� -::,- ; � , ; ,' � � ; ► -. . .. , ,��-_ ��.�.►_:[�L:1, ;��;;;��,_ _ _ ,; , , , , � � � ; ,�;�'� � � ; '�`.,ti '\ .,. .�:�� . 1 � � ' _ l '�:',� • � • � ��.C�_ _H � '�.:.�_ �-;`__., .:;�,�� r ��, �� i � ; � / i ' I I ' I �i' :_,,;., . '�� -� ` , � , , DI �_ ,�! .� � � i - � .�.��.. -� ��: � � AMOND LAk:E � �1, ; , � � . . ! _ _� F = - . � � i i � �j � , ; ITI I � ; r ' ��`? � ;_;_;� � ��: � � � ► � �� -=='j�-- � � � --i , �---� � � ( �� '�'•'r� � -� � ' �i � � � � I J ' � \ �T 1 _.. iiT � i 1-` i�, t- i �, F---•-= i_ _ - � J � i � �. f ,-' 1�=� �.: _ _� � � , � i i � ; //-�' i . � .� (-_: r-i-i �y�/ � _� ' � ._�t..� � � r t � � ' .✓'� _'�� ' �l- V ^ I•-- -,' .' ' �'/'— �`` . ._. �.fi_� � � —'--r-•''It. ; �V, I � , J T' iEr G.�,�• •'�'♦ l �t,�' �i • � . ,� � ' __ ;=: � ��. � :� �.'. - �:° - 90(dBC _ � . � �� - !_��, 1 ._.�.. � ' V Lr � '. � t rc�5 N' ..5�" 7 � _ . ' j ' I "_. *f�,.s . � _r_'.� !� ' i"�'- � I �SiY= �"' * -�_i i�.� � i j j I�%:��.�� ", i i_ � ( � I `=�.��c�: `?� : _�__ r ;\ , i � � � �-�-� I ..j.� � i_ y.,_� �' '��~K,--' . j.:'� �'1 • \. ''' _ . ( � -'-�-}-I-i ' r ,,;j, ? ,-- i �� - ��. -; - i ,.� . � . � I I I i T � -,l I ! � I i-rt I ' a. _ �`�✓r ; � �\_' . '. i ( �_I -,,��" : _ ( I I �I . R ` /�:� � .� . . '��. ='�, .� : , ; � 1 � ,' � � I � �� `, ,;:., / =l�;� . `, �i � . � � _ ii� --; li, i'! �'�' `'� ' � . . ' -��3�� i i �,� .5� � `� � � ;' �_i �� _I � ��.i7 i� g��C�B .:, ..;t� __ ,.1: .' . �-�-�- �.,�x. � ` � '� � ' _i__I � ,..� � J ..��A I . ; �--(-j, � - ( ;i-j-� ` .. � � I � ��-"�'. 'x%• - . . _;��1� r-) .l.__ a! I' �._i �:;� � i � Mt '�' ( ; � - r: -�--�- 'r F� i :�3,5�.-,.�;__��_��-j �, , , ��:" �-_i" — —,:�_�.I_. .;., � i � � � � � �� ;1{! ' �'' . . -(�i ; � �; � -,_ ; ; .r. _� _ ; �.. ;-, ~ �= ��:s ��SP PropOSed i " `�_ . 4 " � � 1 r i �i-1 �� : ��-� �� .1 t i � i � a- '-�- �,, _, . � ; � -,- �?�i ' .l� �-�'�� 1 � � � . � v� ;;� t:�; � . _� ; � � � � � � � r �i1�, � North- S o�.ih l�unwa . ` 494 L' � i_ — -- n .M1 ! � _ , �� __ r�. .L _ ��'- ~,,.'� .�,::=' t.:t ' _�. _ , �; � = � r-- -r � �.:,... mr (d.� �, -�^� 'lr - ___.��`� i �__�.-� '—. � � r I �' oF �� ` f � -- �Al1GLA ) �011�0 t.l.l � � �1— i, � �-� t � ! � � ; • .._ :,- �� . , � —' � � � _ �` I .L_� ' � j . : . �r , . � 'ty J�� `�'�L:� ;1; t T .`f--'•� ��: �� ,-��; �- ,-; ; �=� i ; -:_; ,-:, ;�. :�� : � `Ne�v Te " :� -� , , �... ; �;- , . . � � ; � �-- ; ,---a .. ��;�: :t�_ chnology - r� � ;� � . �' ' � �'''� '. ----� ,;, .��,_` � - — � -, � ► . ; , � -,- �, ^; �- : �-�� Sta � � � � ._. _. � , ��: r..�::�: ge 3 Aircraf�. , _.�. i ; -; ; ; , �--i . , ;,. :.,;,�._ -- -�:�.i-;.ii�.. .- ;;: �Jt -- -�-- .-•- �`';:;` '� �f . i i I . , . , � , � � ' :,�.' `� � I i ; i , � � : .1. _ _ .�. . . . . . ' . � � �. 1 � ' � i t � 1 � : -� I � ; r . , - � '''• ,� • , i � l .` I (' I � i � j" . � � � ' • . ' . .�^., �:.ir:: .. . ..._1__l. �. I t � .� _ � . .-) �--- � � � +. � �_ _ �.� "::;f',:- �:.` . �-(-� , � '� i - � � i i � •�:i%f",:i.`,.':.;:;.:�;i: � ( '_ �\1 i i ' ��^ i :�j'i,.,��F:, i � � -`I`•`I � � �' 1 ( I � _ I ( �', � !.) .� - I I' ' I ( ( ( ' � ! ::i�.{.,..�.i;�tii:• . . . �: ' I - i ( - . - �- —,-• - • -• -- '�.�;- : � � �I __ _. ,\ _..i � . � ^ . ' ; . , . _ .= �:;'.<`;:;'�:: i i � � � � J � � � I i �. � � . ',4:::.;��i;�. . �.� � � ' j1' i ( � � � ' ' ' ' . +'' '; ;:i' ' • ' I .'I ' t ,_.___.: . ':�' �:�,?. . �-_� . _. _ . . . �.. _ i � . . - . l ; . . ; . . ;Y; �,:_:.;' " : . � � � .. i�.':'`•::�::;:.: ,,' , . , OLD SHAKOPEE � : � : . . . , _ ::::.:::...:�. _ ., , .: _ , ��y'.�:�;;.��.:�:�.� ' ,\._ .:, - ;. � . �_' � T a ROA� I . . . �_, � . .�_ : : � , �� —, , , : �- � .' : .-, ; . . , �. I :;.. - �.. � � :..�_; !'i� ' ' � '' � ' ` � _; _ _ i � . , . . . . . . . ; . . . . ;�� . . __ . , � ...:; . � . � %�� i ' , i �� . ,'• � ,, . , . ' i . � ' , �• . : � ,. : -� �. � :._ - � . , — . � r� f ', ,:. • �,;:, " �Q; MASAC Operations Committee FRC7IVI: Roy Fuhrrnann, Technical Advisor �' SLJ$JEC'T': MASAC & Operations�Committee Work Plan for 1999 ��'I'�: November 5, 1998 1VI�SA.0 Goals and �Jbjectives � The following table lists the proposed dates for the MASAC Operations Committee and the �MASAC meetings for 1999. Additionally, staff has added specific discussion items for various meeting dates that may be of interest Finally, the following list of activities have already been identified during 1998 as topics for consideration and actions that must be completed during 1999: 1. , Develop specifications for Investigating GPS Landing System Use for Noise Alleviation 2. Review Nighttime Hours 3. Non-simultaneous Corridor Departure Analysis 4. Evaluate departure compliance through the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor and make any necessary changes to the relevant procedures. 5. Evaluate and investigate the benefits of a Ground Run-up Enclosure 6. FAA tour of the Farmin�ton Air traffic Control center 7. Continue Part 150 contour generation review. 8. Providing incentives to carriers in acquiring and operating factory made Stage III aircraft. 9. Provide feedback to the MAC in their efforts to communicate changes in operations, due to consiruction schedules, to the surrounding communities Staff will also coordinate the following activities throuahout 1999: 10. Installation and upgrade of ANOMS to version 6.3 (Our current version is 4.2). I 1. Write Rec�uest for Proposal (RFP) for the installation of five additional RMTs 12. Coordinate and supervise the installation of the RMTs and the integration of these sites into A1�101VIS. 13. Complete Year 2000 compliancy for all Aviation Noise Program applications. 14. Enhance noise hotli.ne information dissemination optians and publish various construction updates via the Internet. Many of the staff items must be completed during 1999 for obvious year 2000 compliancy. The installation of additional RMTs and the up�rades to ANOMS will require staff to dedicate considerable tirne to the process for a successful installation process. Please come prepared to consider the above items as well as other issues that will help MASAC focus on the overall reduction of noise at MSP. ( Proposed 19991VIASAC Goals and Objectives Calander ,� P'�rojecf,ee�i I�mt�� -�,t�,canin�lis ' �s y.�-�..�-; � .- �_ _::: .'��f''F,�,t ��fi�''�: �'1�� 5 3 Yr'E.`—,.�`'��' � ttt_ � ��tc2T• ....,,. s � � ``� -��,,, �8qiill �ffi8I1tS .� � � . " � � -�r� _.,.� �-- �y ��. `'�� ` � .._:,. _ ..� � � . ._; . � - , -� _ . ; Goals & Objectives for 1999 January 15 Operations Committee Develop specifications for Investigating GPS ^ Landing System Use for Noise Alleviation January 26 MASAC Orientation Topic - Jet Engine Noise Sources February 12 Operations Committee RMT Installation Update February 23 MASAC FAA tour of the Fazmington Air traffic Control Center Mazch 12 Operations Committee March 30 MASAC Receive MSP Construction Briefing(G. Warren) April 9 Operadons Committee Non-simultaneous Comdor Departure Analysis Apri127 MASAC Jeff Hamiel Update on MAC May 14 Operations Committee May 25 MASAC .RMT Site.Location update June 11 - Operations Committee ' Construction Update June 22 MASAC Orientation Topics Page 2 `iR.. � • Projectaed I)aie Acco�plisi�i�,g �. ��-- � ,ap,e�" . v'' ';-�=-p-7��-g�f ¢� , �� t .'.f � i�. .2 y� . r}x,:y . t-,..."-r,� .r Y„ . iY .�GHIY 48xi��W . . .: .. �y y ��5.+-r- �'��J -4. 5`�'1�- ' _ ''2 ._r-. � ...-. `S '�2Z�i.i . �� i `'"�,-`.i-�� Y�� -, �^'i�*t'.^,"'^_3- -......- . . . .. ... .. July 9 Operations Committee Construction Update July 27 MASAC � August 13 Operations Committee Construction Update August 24 MASAC ,. September 10 Operations Committee September 2$ MASAC Stage III Compliance Review October 8 Operations Committee October 26 MASAC Orientation Topics November 12 Operations Committee Focus Activities for Upcoming Year November 30 MASAC Part 150 Progress Review December 10 Operations Gomrnittee Establish Calendar for 2400 Page 3 � � � `am! � rq � � � r� � � � o � y Vi � 0 � � o� � �� ,�j Cl. O " � ��:, = � L a �� .� � ° - .. � L � V1 � �� O "'" ��vo �� °� � o �° �b � Q� . Wd � O ~ � � � � �= � G) �� ~ � � • e � � �[�. � Cii Q V C—� . �" .� �e/ � . `� � �d � Q � L C� � � � � � � � �' o a� >; � -- � ^ � U c-�-" � � ¢ � v �s � � � � � � �Cj N �� CO � .� �L a� � c� . � r� � �n .� � �r � '�" C� � ►� '� M � p v�i � � � � � t� � p ?� �a ♦� � � V � � _. � � "� '�-��.. o �'3 � � � � � � �� ¢s�� N "�+ N C O� O � M � �' � N � � � �O O� � '"''� N M o^000.-. ^0000�, �/'? ^ M f'•1 � N N� n p� M F/) 69 b9 69 64 b�q � �� C� G`� C' v'1 [`+ h �p � �t v1 O r7- O^ pp �� 69 64 6'? 69 69 �'1 a � a a � N � 0 0 0 0�� o .i = ..-r� w ° ,, � ` O� M O� M �y I� '�t �^ �r o� �r o rr o� N V� c0 � 00 "�t `�f V1 a N M c}' V'1 �D [� E•. Q� Q� Q� CT Q� CT O Q� Q� O� Q� CT O� � C , � ��_` Minneapolis / St. Faul International Airport �'"d�'.�.� `. MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council c�,�,,,,�: Rn6ert P.Johnson �ire Qu�irnwn: rn�,� H��s Ttchni[al.-idvitar; Rm Fuhrtuann s«.«a„•: ��i� s��ro�� Airnorne £sp2s Brian Bates �iir Tmnspan,(ssxiutinn: e��, >t�c� AIPA: �o �on,�o c;n• of a�oomiR,Q,o�: Petrnna Lce Vern Wilrnz cr�� ofa�mn•�n�: Ed Porter c,�• of�,,Q�: Jov Hohenstein I.��ee S�aric6a Cin• of lnrcr Grm�e HriRhts: Dale Hamtnons Cin• of,lfenJnm Hei,qhts: Jtil Smith 2feri� Bxtchelder Ciro aj,4finnrrtpofis: Dean Lindberg Skve �ilnn Joe Lee Gtenn Strand Sandra Cotvin Rov Stlke Cr.�mer Crn� vf Richj�dd: Krfstai Stokes ...�.; ,� .. Dawn 1i'eitze! City af S�. Lnurs Purk: Ro6ertAdrews Cin�nfS�. Paul: Thomas H. Hueg Cin• nfSunfith LccFr: Cienda Spbtta Delm Air Linrtlnc.: � co�n�� DHL Ain.�uxs: Brian Simoawn FrJrrul Erprers: Dan DeBarti Frdrru! Aria�inn ,Wministluliun � Brucc Wagoner Cindy Greene ,+r,�cs«B o��k heinz ,41 B.L{: fL�bert P. Johmnn .tlrsuhu Nnnh wrrt .1 irlink; Phit Burke .Ltrvnpolitan.4irpnrts C�immu'sron: Cnmmisioner Altnn (;mper ,4L�' ,-tir,Yunnn��! Guunl.� .Ha}or Rny J. Shetkv .Ynrth N�rsr .4 irfinrr St:vk Salmen Jennifer SavR titere Holme ,\ancv ti�iudl St P,m! Ch�minrr,il C��mmr�rr Rolf .11icShcewn sun cnum„�.-t��6nrr tN�rdun cra.es L�nrrrJ i�rbnrc Im I+erin B�ac1: 1 �iurd Y,vrrrl Sm ri r >like Gerrr i.�� A�r F'urrr R��rn�r Cupiuin U�� id .I. t Izrkrn Metmpoiitan Airports Commission Declaration of Purposes l.) Promote public welfare and riational security; serve public interest, convenience, and necessity; promote air navigation and transportation, international, nationai, state, and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, safe, and economical handling of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in national and intemational programs of air transportation; and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the metropolit,�n.aiea in this state as an aviation center, and to correlate that area with a11 aviation facilities: in the entire state so as to provide for the most econornical and effective use,of a��onautic facilities and services in that area; 2.) Assure the residents of the metropolitan area of the minimum environmental impact from air navigation and transportation, and to that end provide for noise abatement, control qf airport aiea land us�. and other protective measures; and 3.) Promote the overall goals of the state's environmental poIicies and minimize the public's exposure to noise and safety hazards around airports. Nletropolitan Aireraft Sound Abatement Council Statement of Purpose This corporation was formed in furtherance of the general welfare of the communities adjoining i�iinneapolis-St. Paul Intemational Airport - Wold-Chamberlain Field, a public airport in the County of Hennepin, State of Nfinnesota, through the alleviation of the problems created by the sound of aireraft using the airport; throuah study and evaluation on a continuing basis of the problem and of sug�estion for the alleviation of the same: throu�h initiation, coordination and promotion of reasonable and effective procedures. control and regulations, consistent with the safe operation of the airport and of aircraft usina the same; and through dissemination of information to the affected communi[ies, their afiected residents, and the users of the airport respecting the problem o'r aircraft noise nuisance and in respect to suggestions made and actions initiated and tahen to alleviate the problem. �ietropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council Representation The membzrship shall include rzpresentatives appointed by agencies, corporations.: association> and go��e, �unen[al bodies which by reason of their sta[utory authority and responsibili« or con[rol o��er th� airpor� or by reason of their status as airport users, have a dire::! interest in the operation of [he airpor[. Such members will be called User Representati�es and Puolic Representatives, provided that the User Representatives and Public Repr sentati�•es shall at all times be equal in number. The Airport �=-:�uur Nni.,� ,�-Indine is -_'h-9-Fl l. Cuinpluint.r �u ri:: itutli�ir.�:�� not res!ri! ir. chun�,e.i in.-lirpnn ur:r:::�.: hut pro•, i�e a puhli� ;oun�lin� hoard ancl aim��' infom��!:��n uutlet. T;�e hotline iti st:lt��c�1 durir_ �usiness %:� :�rs. ,binr�':;�; - Fric(uc. l�Ietropolitan Airports �ommission .;:•:atior� .��o��e P,e`;rnms This report is prepared and printed in house Chad L�qve. AN0�1S Courdinutor Snane VanderVoott. �'VOivfS Technician Ques[ions or comments mav be directed to: M.�C - Aviation itioise Prosrams :bfinneapulis / 5t. Paul (nternationul .�irpon 6f}al) 3Sth .-lvcnue Suuth 1�finneaoolis. �tti i�-t�Q Tel: 161'_) 7�5-b33I. Fax: (61'_1 7�'S-6�IQ ,�\SP Home Pa�e: http:/hvww.maca�'sat.or C ; � �d �emate Mo�itori�g S"ite �ocations 12 �`arrier Jet Arrival I�elated 1Voise Eve�ats 13 Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT........... C'ar�~ier ,Jet �e�ariu�-e .�elated I�ois� �vents 14 ..................................13 Count of Departure Aircraf� Noise Events for Each RMT .................. a �. �'e� Lou�est Aircraft 1�Tozse' :�vents Identi�ed I5 " l. �, �'en �,oudest Aircraft 1Vois� .�'�ents Identified 16 7'en Loudest �.ir�raft lVo�se :�vents Id'entz�ed ,. Z'e� Z,oudest 19.ircrc�, ft 1lToise Events Identi,�"ied �'en Loudest �.ircra, ft 1�Toise .Events �d�nti, f i�d �'�� Lozar%st �.ircraft �Io�se .�venis Identi, f "ied �'light Track �ase �i�ap 21 ........................14 Airpori Noise anr� C,�perations 1�o�titori�g ,Syst�rn Flight �'rac�s 22 Carrier Jet Operations - October 1998 ............................................... ?? �irport 1lloise a�a� C�p�ra�ions .��niioring S�st-��z �'lig�h� �'ra��s 2� Carrier Jet Operations - October 1998 ...............................................................................23 �4 ir,��rt �o�s� and i�pe�atio�as r��onitori�8 �'ystsm F'izg��t �'rac�s 2� Carrier Jet Operations - October 1998 ............................................... 24 �.�r��-t 1�T�ise a�z�` �pe�-atio�s �o�tzto�i�g �'yst��c F'lig�� "�-�ack� �5 Camer Jet Operaxions - October 1998 .............................................................................. 2� �.��sis �,�'��,��r��'i 1'��s� .�ve,�ts - 1�i3'��'CZ,�`'� �dn. ��.f�.� �� f�..Y��i.��SlS i��"��'�� I�+IflZS2 �'��i��S - .�i; ��-�,f� �dn �z'�{A) �� .A�'ia!iun :�oise ��'c $atcllite Frc>��r�m� C� �vietropolitan Airports Commission Opera�ic�ns �nd Compl�int S�mt�ary October 199� - Operations Summary - All Aircraft Runway Arrival % Use Departure % Use 04 133 0.7% 49 0.3% 22 105 0.5% � 12 2.7%a 12 10457 53.4% 10515 54.6�/a i 30 8902 � F, 45.4°Io 8182 - 42.4°!0 N1SP Octobe�l�'leet Mix Percentage Stage Schedulecl Scherlulerl ANOMS r�NOIVIS 1997 ... ,. 1998 i- Count 1997 Count 1998 Stage 2 41!Q% 29.7% 43.3% -� 29.1% ... Stage 3 59.0% 70.3% 56.7% �_ 70.9% Airport October Complaint Summary A.irport 1997 199� MSP 742 939 Airlake 1 0 Anoka 7 14 Crystal 0 0 Flyin� Cloud 1 10 Lake Elmo 2 0 St. Pau! 1 5 Misc. 0 0 TOTAL - 754 968 t�ctober Operations Summary - FA� Airport Traffi� Record � � ��'z �� r �� ' � sf� �� . �.r._ .. ., _ �d"� �C�l� �4n u � 2 l�,?�.}�'d.^� f � t-1 ! � � R�aS �":�i+�{y?t.�r.�Y%'=Y',^��S�S��.,�''�i � • ..::-.,A....n.,..,-.��.,,..a.....<,._�,.-.-....,m.....,.....,K.; �•��■■ I� • i ��6��, f '1 { ,��iatiur, \oise :�c Sateilite Pr��rams p•��,� I Metropolitan Auports Commission �ir�neapolis - ��a P��l ��ern�tional Airport �ompl�� Sum�ary 0 0 . ,f �,�. �.�,, Complaint Summary by City City Arrival I)eparture Total PercentagQ A le Vallev 1 2 3 0.3% Bloominaton 1 21 22 2.5%a Burnsville Q. 1 1 0.1% a:. EaQan -1Q' 29 39 4.3�70 Eden Prairie -y 0-�.' � 5 5 0.6% Edina 0�:1- 10 10 1.1 % Golden Valle 2 1 3 0.3% Ho kins 2• 0 2 0.2% Inver Grove HeiQhts � 9� 253 262 29.1% Ma le Grove 13 10 23 �. 2.6% Mendota Hei�hts �� 5 32 37 � 4.1% -� Minnea olis 160 230 390� 43.2% Minnetonka 4 2 6 0.7% Plvmouth 3 0 3 0.3% Richfield 13 35 48 5.3% Robbinsdale 0 1� 1 0.1 % Roseville 0 1 1 0.1 °% St. Louis Park 9. 0 9 1.0% St. Paul 20 8 28 3.1% Sunfish Lake 0 8 8 0.9% W ' � °I Total 252 650 902 1(�% Time oi Day Nature of Complaint Pa��e ? A� i�tti�.�n \oi�: �c Satellitc I're�vram� .A�vaiiab�e Time for I�un�way LTse Tow�r Log �Zepor�s - October 1998 All Hours 0% �i % • 4$% Me[ropolitan Airports Commission 51% _ b6 °yo Note: For 7% of the time ai•ailable, simulianeous depanure operations occurred oj}'[he paratlels and nvy 22 resulting in an overall use greater than 100%. Nighttime Hours 0% 1% � -t—. „ �� =. "; /�_ ��,��,�, .� �' � �.,.�\ ' , =��;_,�\ �.�-� ,,�� -� �� " �'� � -�� \ /�=;: � � ; ,��,� ;�� t� i � �. � �- (�� \�\J I �� / %5% . , %`� �; �a% �% '. ;' i- Note: For 3�'c of the time al�ciianle, siir.ultaneous departure operatinns occc�rred ' j{� cfo of� ti;� parallels and rt �• 32 resul:ing irt an ot�eral! use greater than /(��ic. i � ,a�;iatio- \'oi;e � Satellite Fo<>ram; Pa�e 3 C� Metropolitan Airports Commission �.11 Ope�°aiions �.unway LTse Repoa-t October 99� ,--��'� � � ,; ,,, ArrivaU October October Runway De arture Count Perc�ntage 1997 Count �� P Percentage 04 A 133 0.7% 16� 0.9°Io 12L A 5266 26.9C/c 4754 27.4% 12R A 5191 26.�% 4788 27.6% 22 A 10� O.��Ic 312 1.8% 30L A 4393 22.4`7c 3841 22.1 % 30R A 4�09 23.0�'0 3512 20.2% Z'o� �r�; 19597 ( 100% 17372 ( l�}0% 04 D d,9 I 0.39c 49 I 0.3% 12L D � 1�7 26.8cc 46-94 27.4�Io 12R D ��3 `� 27.8�'c �310 31.00'c 2� j� � j 1? '. I 2.7�'c 688 I 4.O�c 30L I D ^0�� I 20.9cc �316 19.3%a 30R ( D ( '' 1-'.9 21.5�'c 3083 ( 1.8.090 `_ '�'otal Dep. �' .. �_�� 192�8 I lt}0 �i'o E 17140 I 1(i0 70 �_�� _ Nnte: .�1RTS ttcitn mi.s.siit,� f lr (.-; dut's. Pa�*e � A�'iation \oi;e �� S'�t�llite Progr�m> Carrier Jet Op�rations I2unr�vay �Jse IZeport October 99� 0.1 %a 42 .2% 53.$ 0.6 % 2.0% Metropolitan Airports Commission 44.9% 55.7% � ArrivaU October �ctober --�2unway �p�� Count Percentage 1997 Count 1�� Percentage 04 A 102 0.7% 109 0.9% 12L A 3633 26.5% 3089 26.2% 12R A 3734 27.3�7'0 3343 28.4% 22 A 82 0.6% 232 2.0% 30L A 2998 21.990 2694 22.9% 30R A 3143 23.OG/o 2301 19.6% Total Arr. 13b92 100% 1176� 1Q0% 04 D 1� 0.1�'0 12 0.1% 12L D �659 26.99c 3073 26.2% 12R D �925 `. 28.8% 3806 3?.5% 22 D � 277 �, 2.09c 41 ^-. 3.�% 30L D 3067 2?.�9c 2b03 22.2�0 30R D 2678 19.7�Ic 1808 � 15.�% '�'otal i3ep. � ' '` 13621 I � � �/o � 1715 i �D °Io Nnte: ARTS dcua missing for 0.� du�•s. Aviation �oi�e c�: Satellitz Pro�Tram; Page 5 t� ; Metropolitan Airports Commission Pa�e 6 '�„ I�ighttirne - All �pera�ions 12unway tTse Report October 998 o.s% 31.9 % 4.� %a 30.2 'I i �, �n I 62.3 %a 59.3 °Io �. ArrivaU October October Runway �P�� Count Percentage 1997 Count percen e � pq. A 31 3.390 34 4.9% 12L A 148 15.7% 13 ( 1.9% 12R A 136 14.�% 27 3.9% 22 A 39 4.2�7c $2 11.9% 30L A 238 25.39c 367 53.4% 30R A �48 37.00/c 165 24.0% Total Arr. 940 1C0�'o 66� I 1(3fl% pq. j� ( I 0.8% 5 I 1.6% 12L D 26 i 3�.7�'c 79 24.2% 12R D 200 `�. 2�.6�'c 12'—' I 38.0% 2? p, 6? '. 5.0�% 60 ( 18.4'% 30L D 97 12.—'.�'c 3? 9.890 �OR D ( 1 �2 I 19.� c 26 � 8.0�'0 �'�'oial �ep. . 780 I � C0 �'c 32S ( 3�'�% � Note: ,�1 RTS dctta missin� for 0.� da�•s. A��iation :��vi�e �� Satr;llite Program� Metropolitan Airports Commission I�tighttime ��rr��r Jet Operatao�.s �.unway Use Repor� October 99S 0.9 °Io 30.4% � 4.0% 31.8 ,' �. ��tt, 60.7% � 59.7% ArrivaU October �ctober Runway �P�� Count Percentage 1997 Count 1�� , �ercentage 04 A 26 3.5% 30 5.5% 12L A 124 16.7�70 9 1.6°Io 12R A 112 I 1 �.1 °Io 2� 4.6% 22 A 30 4.09c 6� � 11.8% 30L A 193 26.090 298 54.3% 30R A 2�8 I 34.7% 122 � 22.2% Total Arr. 743 I i00% 549 30�% 04 D s ( 0.9% 1 0.5% 12L D 125 I 28.2�Ic 5� .�.� 29.99c 12R D 1�0 �, I 31.j �/c 66 �5.9% 22 D I T'0 ( 9.09c , 32 17.49c �OL D 77 ( 17.��'c 20 10.9�'c 30R D �8 I 1�.1 r'c 10 I �.4 �c � Total �p. � I l�i� �o � l� I 1fl�3% Note: ,-�RTS dnru missin�; fvr 0.-? duti•s. Aviatic�n `�oi�;e R Sntzllite Provram� PaQe 7 ( l ;� , Metropolitan Airports Commission �arr�er Jet Operations by 'I`ype October 199� A.ia�craft Type Count P�rcentage B777 2 0.0% B727H 499 1.8% B�2Q + 235 0.9% B73B �' _, 102b 3.7°l0 B74A. � �.i' 200 0.7% _ B74B 25 0.1% B757 � � 2633 9.6% B767 � 0 0.0% Bp,q.� � 1242 4.5% C�J 353 1.3% DC 10 �64 2•g% DC8 3 0.0% �DC9H 7106 26.0% E145 213 0.8% A300 44 0.2% A310 30 0.1% A319 2 0.0% A320 280$ 10.3% F100 837 3.1% L101 18 0.1% MD 11 1 0.0% MD80 1342 � 4'.9% H25B 0 0.0% H25C 0 I 0.0°Io BA11 I 0 0.0% B727 ?784 10.2% B73A � 16�3 6.1 °Ia DC8 ( �b0 1.3°Io DC9 3133 I Il.i�'o F� g I 0 0. 0 �c %tal ( 27313 I 1 Q0 % 4 Nnte: .? RTS dctrcr missin� jnr C1.Y' da�s. p;ti1z � 1�V1;1[IOl1 �01�. �: S1Ic:��:I� �i0�_Ti'��,� �_ _ a � �', � �:,- `;[ ��..� % .��.�f', .� Metropolitan Airports Commission �ircrait Identifier and Descriptio�Table Identifier A.ircraft Description B727 BOEING 727 B727H BOEING 727 - HUSH KIT B72Q BOEING 7?7 - HUSH KIT B73B � BOEING 737 - 300/4Q0/500 `, , B73A . � BOEING 737 100/200 4� B74A � - ` �{ $OEING 747 - 100/200/3Q0 . B74B " - � ' BOEING 747 - 400 - B757 BOEING 757 ' B767 ' •� � , BOEING 767 B777 , BOEING 777 "- � �. . H25C $RITISH AEROSPACE 125 - 1000 - � H25B BRITISH AEROSPACE 125 - 700/800 BA 11 BRTTISH AEROSPACE i 1 I BA46 BRITISH AEROSPACE 146 CARJ CANADAIR 650 FA 10 FALCON 10 DC 10 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC 10 DC8 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DCB, DC8 70 - SERIES RE (.ALL SERIES) DC9 M�CDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 DC9H NiCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 HUSH KIT E145 EMBRAER 145 A300 AIRBUS WDUSTRIES A300 A310 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A310 A319 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A319 A320 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A3?0 F100 FOKKER 100 F27 FOKKER F�7 (PROP) F28 FOKKER F28 L l01 LOCKHEED TRISTAR L 1011 , MD 11 '�4CDb�ivELL DOUGLAS DC 11 MD80 � �iCDONi`�tELL DOUGLAS DC9 80-SERIES SW3 SWEARINGEiti �,SETROLI�iER 3 SbV4 S�VEARItiGEti �1ETROLI�iER 4 SF34 5,4,�B �-}0 A�'i•,!t;,�:: ti'oise €c Sstellitz Pro�zrnm� Metropolitan Airports Commission �unv��y �Jse - �ay/l�igh� Per�o�s - �ll Operaiflo�s IVlinneapolis - St. Paul International A,irp�rt Ociober 199� Daytime Hours Runway Departures Percentage Arrivals P�rcentage TotalI)ay Name I)ay Use Day Use 04 43 0.2% 102 0.5% 145 12L 4894 26 �.P% 5118 27.4% 10012 12R 5158 .27..9%q' S0�5 27.1% 10213 22 450 `: 2.5%' �� 66 0.4-% 516 30L 3936 21.3°Io 4155 22.3% 8091 30R 3997 -� 1.6% ' 4161 22.3% � 8158 Total 1847� �`�� 100 % 18657 100 %- 37135 Nighttime Hours Runway Departures Percentage Arrivals Percentage Totall�tight Name Night Use Night Use 04 6 0.8% 31 3.3% 37 12L 263 �3.7% 148 15.7% 411 12R 200 2�.6% 136 14.5% 336 22 (2 8.p�lo 39 4.2% 101 30L 97 1?.4cla 238 25.3% 335 30R 152 19.5% �48 37.0% 500 Total 781� 100% , 94� 100% 1720 Note: .�RTS data missing for 0.-� da�•s. Pa��z ]0 A�ia:ion tioi<� :� Satz!lite Pro��ram; Me[ropolitan Airports Commission Comrr�uni�y Civerflight Analys�s IVV�inneapol�s - Si. Paul Internation�l r�irpoa�t October 1998 Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours I�iumber Number �'otal Percent 1Vumber of Overflight r�rea A�vals j�pa�.tures Carrier Jef Carrier Jei Operations Operations Operations per 24 Hours Over So. Minneapolisl 7367 ;.. 5745 13112 48.0% 428.5 No. Richfield a ,; : �� Over So. Richfield/ 102 - �'277 379 ,1.4% �` 12.4 I; �� . Bloomington : .. . . - Over St. Paul - 82 15 97 0.4% . 3.2 Highland Park , ' • � Over Eagan/ 6141 7584 13725 �50.2% 448.5 , - Mendota Heights ' � � Totai ..,. 27313 1�% 892.6 Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (10:30pm - 6 am) Number 1�lumber '�oial I'e�nt l�tumber of Overflight Area A�v�s �p�� Carrier Jeg Carrier Jet Operations Operations Op�rations pea� 24 Hours Over So. Minneapolis/ 236 135 371 31.2% 12.0 No. Richfield Over So. Richfield/ 26 40 66 5.6% 2.1 Bloomington Over St. Paul - 30 4 34 2.9% 1.1 Hi�hland Park Over Ea�an/ 451 265- 716 60.3% 23.2 �' Mendota Hei�hts Total 11�7 1t30% 38.4 Note: �1RTS data missing for 0.4 da1�s. .A�•ia[ion :�Ioise & Satellit� Pr�r�ram; Page 1 l Metropolitan Auports Commission Rer�ote IVlon�ior�ng �ite Locati�ns t�irport l�oise and �perations 1Vlonitoring System �iJ Fs��— I � F�� F 7 2 (;� , FSn4 `� � e ' FSr3 � tt • � � •� �i0 � Y I O e FST5 • / , I r 5?� � �.__. -`- �" " _¢7 7 • � �j F S, 7 f �' V,:' � -z-_'— I r�'� � ; F _2; °�endota Heights Richfield e �s�jte ,{`��'�� '� •=;��3 � i � � p � i� � R. � , - i ,( �, / ; c� O � � i� �� F5='�, • ' FS,'1-2 t ! � • FJ "� s r� °� S' ;�a • � '�� % / Inver Grove HeiQhts � � �' I ' �A�� \'�\,' / . b j `� i + �� + e ��= G /�-� t / / I � B�loorrun�ton � � j � Ea�a � i ;� 5 ✓,% "L/ � / � � � j v ` � ' .V. � ,' • , � � /� , �; �v � .aQ �� G \ � i � � � � � ' /-',� i ' � ! / t I � / � `� \ ,. i t� y` � � � � /: cocc �; ~; � _� ' %'i/ `� �-';;',�= �-' Page I ? Aviatie�n Noi�� : Satelliee PruJram� Metropolitan Airports Commission C��rf er J�i Aa-riv�l �elaied No�se Events October 1998 Count of Arrival Aircrait Noise Event� for Each RNIT RMT Events Events Events Events ID City Appmximate StreQt L�caiion ��dB �80d�3 >90dB >100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 5402 188 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenuu� & 43rd Street 3913 712 12 0 3 Minneapolis W ElmwoodStreat & Belmont Avenue 3991 2862 " 288 0 - �� 4 Minneapolis Oakland Qvenue & 49th Street 3876 _ 1381 15 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 45�6 3462 � 670 I 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue &�57th Street 4632 3188 822 1 7 Richfield Wentworth Avenue & 64th Sireet 23 -- 3 0 0 � . 8 1Vlinneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street - 13 -_ I 0 0 9 � St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 83 53 1 0 �10' St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 93 78 l� 0 11 St. Paul Finn StreEt & Scheffer Avenue 19 1 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton Street & Rockwood Avenue 15 1 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 77 3 0 0 14 Eagan First Street & McKee Street 3139 7� 1 _ 0 15 Mendota Hei�hts Cullen Street & I.exin�ton Avenue 284 8 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue &�las Lane 3360 1795 8 0 17 Bioomington 84th Srreet & 4th Avenue I 17 33 0 0 18 Richfield 7�th S[rz�t & 17th Avenue 119 19 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 8�th Street 26 3 0 0 20 Richfield 75th Screet & 3rd Avenue 7 1 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara ra��enue & 67th S[ree� 1�7 0 0 0 22 Inver Grove HeiQh[s Anne l�tarie Trail 3�&� 14 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 18�7 32 I 1 0 24 EaQan Chape! Lane & l�'ren Lane 1�94 16=z 1 0 Note: .-�RTS data missing fnr 0.=f da��s. ,41•iation '�oi:e �;: Sateflit� Pro4aram; Paee 13 ,r \ Metropolitan Airports Commission Carr��r Jet I)ep�rture I�elated I�oise �ve�is �ctober 199� Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Eaci�-Ri'�IT g�T Events - Ev�nts Events Events � City Appraximate Streei Locatio� �$� �$ >�B >100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 660 242 2 0 ; ;. 2 Minneapolis Fremont A4enu� & 43rd 3treet 736 396 34 0 3 Minneapolis W Eimwood Street &�I�elmont Avenue 1183 675 �" 96 1 4 Minneapolis Oakland`Avenue &�49th Street 1465_ = 755 I 16 1 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th 5treet 3292 1861 � 548 46 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57� Street 4036 2477 1104 214 7 Richfield Wentvi+oreh Avenue & 64th Street 2422 -� 1150 123 1 8 Iv1iF►neapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street � 1636 �_ 710 109 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 22 9 3 0 10' St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 14 13 7 3 11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 21 8 4 0 12 St. Paul Alton Street & Rockwood Avenue 7 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 3327 718 25 0 14 Eagan ' First Street & McKee Street 2071 7Q0 58 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Lexin�ton Avenue 3353 892 84 2 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue & Ylas L.ane 3912 2038 399 16 17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 114 53 14 0 18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 260 185 79 11 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 233 132 39 0 20 ' Richfield 7�th Street & 3rd Avenue 94 22 5 0� 21 Inver Grove Neishts Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 1632 42� 5 0 22 Inver Grove HeiQhts Anne'�Sarie Trail 1997 ( 282 1 0 23 Ivtendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 5000 2307 831 87 ?4 Easan Chapzl Lane & Wren Lane 3�84 890 19 0 Noce: ,-�RTS dqra missing jor 0.4 davs. Pa�,e l—: A� iation Nois< <`_ Sat�llit� FOUi'��Rli C� Metropolitan Airpons Commission 'I'er� Iloudest A.ircrafi �olse Eve�is �dentified RI�IT #l: Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. Ii�linneapolis Date Tirr� �C �� A/D' T`ype Level � .� 98/ 10/ 13 21:05:41 B 727 92.5 `D 98/10/27 11:24:11 B727 90.6 "D � j 98/10/12 12:01:06 B727 89.9 i D 98/10/18 20:41:10 B727 89.6 D 98/10/20 20:30:04 B727 89.5 - D 9$/10/07 11:38:33 _B727 89.4 � ' D 98/10/13 09:2i:28 B727 89.4 D ,98/10/� 1 19:4�4:28 B727 89.2 D 9$/10/2109:32:30 B727 89.1 D 98/10/2011:42:15 B727 89.0 D RMT #3: W. Elmwood S� � Belmont Ave. Minneapolis Date Tiine ,� M� A/D Level 98l1011613:46:08 B727 102.3 A 98/10/2314:1�0:52 B727 101.1 D 9$/10/3016:07:33 B727 100.0 D 98/ 10/0� 08:23:17 DC9 99.2 A 98/ 10/ 11 14:22:30 B727 99. I A 98/10/?314:39:05 B727 99.0 D 98/ 10/ l 7 22:09:48 B727 98.9 D 98/10/21 11:52:21 B727 98.1 D , 98/ 10/2? 1�:37:09 B74A 97.7 D 98/I0/?0I1:3?:I6 B727 97.6 D RId1T #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St i�inneapoiis Dat� 'I�me �C Max � 1�pe Level 98/10/0418:02:03 B727 95.? A 98/10/20 21:03:13 "B727 95.1 D 98/10/2711:23:51 B727 9�.1 D 98/10/06 21:51:50 B727 94.5 D 98/10/08 09:44:40 -B727 94.4 A 98/10/1120:32:44 :B727 94.3 D 98/10/1811:24:23 B727 93.9 D 98/10/0109:26:34 BA4b 93.8 D 98/10/221139:22 B727 93.� D 98/10/201I:41:51 B727 93.3 D RMT #4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St. �Tinneapolis Date Time T e Level � YP 98/10l1811:24:00 B727 IC0.6 D 98/10/2216:24:56 B727 1Q0.� D 98/10/OS 09:4�:07 B727 98:5 D 98/10/30 09:27:36 B727 98.3 D 9$/10/0619:39:52 B727 97.9 D 98i 10/06 21:� I:12 B727 97.0 D 93/10/13 09:26:3� B727 96.5 D 98/10/01 11:=�:00 B727 96.5 D 98/ ] 0/07 16:21:53 B72Q I 96.3 D 98/IO/1819:�0:4� B7?7 96.1 D Note: ARTS darcr missing for 0.-? [ial•s. A� iatiun �oise & Satellit� P;c,`Trums Pa�e 1� r c Metropolitan Airpores Commission '�'en I,o�dest A.ircr�f�i I�ois� Even�s Ide�tifie� RMT #S: 12th Ave. & 58th St. Minneapolis Date Tim� � M� A!D Level 98/10/0807:17:37 B727 106.4 ,D, j 98/10/21 16:21:13 B727 105.6 �.�D �� i; 98/10/17 16:25:02 B72`I 104.5 ": D 98/10/0116:23:59 B727 104.5 D 98/10/13 20:56:13 B727 104.3 -�� D ' 98/10/01 08:14:20 B73S 104.Y ,�, D 98/10/2711:26:48 B727 103.5 D 98/10/0619:07:44 B727 103.5 D 98/10/2108:11:05 B727 103.3 D 98/10/23 14:10:29 B727 103.3 D RMT #'7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th S� Richfield Date Tirr� �� M� A/D Level 98/ 10/ 17 14:1 I:28 $727 I01.9 D 98/10/07 07:29:50 B727 98.2 D 98/10/3016:30:04 B727 97.7 D 98/10/0713:20:11 B727 97.5 D 98l10/01 15:06:11 B727 97.1 D 98/10/27 21:14:27 B727 96.9 D 98/ 10/ 19 14:16:46 B727 96.6 D 98l10/231�:30:33 B7?7 96.6 D 98/ l 0/07 18:29:13 B727 I 96.? ( D 98/10/17 ? 1:0�-�:?7 B727 I 9�.6 I D R.i�1T #6: 25th Ave. & 57th S� I�Iinneapolis Date Time A/C Max � 1j�pe Level 98I10/19 11:19:02 B727 109.9 D 98/!0/22 16:24:25 = B727 109.2 D 98/10/OS 09:4331-` B727 108.6 D 98/10/23 11:16:47 B727 108.� D 98/10/23 14:25:49 B727 108.5 D 98/10/18 11:23:43 -� B727 108.5 D 98/10/22 1138:17 -__ B727 108.3 D 98/10/23 09.26:43 B727 108.3 D 98/10/22 09:47:17 DC9 107.8 D 98/10/0610:06:25 B727 107.7 D RMT #8: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. Minneapolis Date Time AJC Ma�t � Type Level 98I10/07 08:14:�9 8727 99.5 ' D 98/10/1817:25:38 B727 99.5 D 98/10/3018:58:31 B727 98.0 D 98/10/1817:13:58 B727 97.� D 98/ 10/ 1 S 13:25:09 8727 97.3 D 98/10/2106:57:18 B727 96.9 D 98/10/301�:�2:16 ( B727 I 96.� D 98/ I 0/ 18 l 3:19:34 I B 727 96.2 D 98/10/271=�:11:�3 B727 96.? D 93/ ] 0/ 1 S( 7:=19:?-'. B727 9�.8 D �Y'ote: ,�RTS dcu�t �rtissin; jn.r 0.-� ticl�s. PaQe 16 Aviation ;'�oise K: Sateliite F'�'o�am; Metropolitan Airports Commission 'I'e� I,oudest A�rcrafi I�ois� Eve��.s Ideniified R1�IT #9: Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. S� I'aul Date Ti� �� Max � Level 98/10/28 13:23:04 B74A 96.9 D!� 98/ 10/O i 16:00:35 B74A 94.6 D - ;; 98/10/0100:26:21 B74A 929 `c D 98/10/OS 23:18:40 B727 90.9 A 98/10/1� 05:38:19 DC8 89.9 :•� A 98/10/23 07:15:40 BE18 893 �,. � D 98/10/09 00:59;30 B727 89.0 A 98/10/08 23:53:32 B72Q 88.8 A �98/10/09 05:19:37 DC8 88.6 ' A 98/10/17 06:05:44 DCS 88.6 A RMT #11: Finn St� & Scheffer Ave. S� Paul Date Tirne Tr� M� A/D Level 98/IOI1516:0�:02 B74A 99.8 D 98/10/2713:31:21 B74A 96.5 D 98/10/14 0�:08:22 B72Q 93.9 D 98/10/071�:42:23 B74A 92.9 D 98/ 10/3 l 13:12:23 B74A 92.9 D 98/10/2813:?2:49 B74A 83.7 D 98/ I 0/20 07:06:18 BE I 3 82.7 D 98/ 10/27 22:12:09 DC3 82.6 D 98/ ] 0/09 07: 21:0� B 727 82.3 ( A 98/ 10/O i 16: C0: 24 B 7�,� I 81.4 D RI�1T #10: Itasca Ave. & Sowdoin St. St. Paul A/C Max Date Time �e Level � 98/10/0116:00:11 B74A 103.7 D 98/10/2813:22:38 B74A 102.8 D 98/10/2713:31:0� B74A 102.3 D 98/10/0715:42:08 B74A 100.0 D 98/10/1516:04:48 B74A 99.8 D 98/10/01 00:25:53 -' B74A 983 D 98/10/31 13:12:07 = B74A 98.0 D 98/10/17 05:38:56 DC8 95.5 A 98/10/09 05:59:02 DC8 93.7 A 98/10/09 05:28:43 B727 93.6 A RMT #12: Alton St, cS� Rockwood Ave. St. Paul Date T5me �C �� TyQe Leve! 98/10/09 07:13:16 BE18 88.4 D 98/IOJ0210:21:25 BE60 82.6 D 98/ I 0/0� 07:0�: l 5 B E 18 81.4 D 98/10/2� 12:59:22 B73A 81.2 A 98/!0/?4 07:»:46 BE80 81.1 D 98/10/0819:01:30 DC9 79.� D 98/10/06 08:1 �:28 BE 18 79.2 D 98/10/09 07: (4:22 BE30 79.0 D 98/10/?7 33:12:0� DC9 78.6 D 98/ I 0/ 11 1 �:=�7:3 I I DC9 78.1 D Note: ,�P,TS dntv missing for 0.-� clul•s. ?,�•ia[icn '�oise c�� Satellite F;o2ram� Pa�,e 17 / ` C Metropolitan Airports Commission Te� L,oa�dest �ircra�t I�oise Ev�n�s Identified RNIT #13: Southeast End of Mohican Court Mendota Heights Date Time A/C Max � . T`ype- Level 98/10/31 12:04:21 B727 96.8 D.� 98/10/16 20:49:52 B727 96.3 ,D 98/10/09 11:25:40 B727 95.4 �:' D 98/10/26 20:33:31 B727 9�.7 D 98/10/28 13:17:13 B727 94.5 . ��D 98/10/04 15:39:46 B727 93.9' ,�. D 98/10/0919:40:02 B727 93.9 D 98/10/1514:12:25 B727 93.2 D 9ff/10/24 09:23:3� B727 93.2 D 98/10/0312:13:46 8727 93.1 D „ RMT #15: Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. Mendota Heights Date Tim� �C M� � T�pe Level 98l10/1612:05:41 $727 101.2 D 98/10/1619:01:05 B727 101.l D 98/ I0/23 2 I:53:36 B727 99.6 D 98/10/1619:16:23 B727 98.4 D 98/10/16 23:24:21 B727 983 D 98/ 10/ 17 09:28:4=� B727 97.6 D 98/ 10/0�-t ?0:�0:33 B727 97.5 D 98/10/26?0:40:01 B727 97.� I D 98/10/?918:56:16 B7�7 I 97:1 D 9�/10/l6 ?0:�9:32 B727 96.s I D I2�i�IT #14: lsf 5t. Rc McKee St. Eagan Date Time A/C Max � T�pe Level 98/10/02 09:42:46 DC 10 99.5 D 98/10/2518:45:26 DC9 99.0 D 98/10I24 07:08:03� B727 98.9 D 98/10/23 20:30:59 B727 98.8 D 98/lOJQ6 07:23:01 B73A 98.7 D 98/10/24 07:43:28 -- B727 98.1 D 98/10/2411:15:58 _ B727 97.9 D 98/10/2� OS:1731 B727 97.8 D 98/10/2� 11:12:41 B727 97.6 D 98/10/2611:07:23 B727 972 D RMT #16: Avalon Ave. �& �las Lane Eagan Date Time �C Max � T`ype Level 98/10/2� 11:50:48 B727 102.6 D 98/10/2813:3?:�0 B727 102.I D ' 98/]0/17 (2:05:=�5 B727 101.9 D 98I10/1011:47:39 B727 100.9 D 98/10/16I3:24:13 B727 100.3 D 98/10/1711:56:52 B7?7 100.8 D 98/10/3812:0?:?? B7?7 100.6 D 98/10/0'_ 13:18:19 B727 l00.5 D 9�J 1 U/0= 1 1:38:-� B727 1O0.� I D 9SlI0/0607:19:37 8727 1Cd.� D Nrue: .-�RTS �lcttu missin� jnr 0.-� da•;s. Pa��e 15 ��iation \��i;� & Sat�lli�e Provram� C� C. Metropolitan Airports Commission - :- �'�n�'I:;�ud�i Aircraft N�ise Evenis Ident�fied R�IT #17: 84th St & 4th Ave. Bloomington Date Time ,�� M� A/D Levei 98/10/3013:20:19 B74A 99.9 D �� 98/ 10/ 18 08:24: I 8 B727 99.0 D �; i; 98/10/06 15:23:03 B74A 98.4 ': D 98/10/0815:09:24 � B74A 973 D 98/10/19 06:51:33 B727 97.1 .�� D 98/10/23 16:22:59 B727 96.9' ,. � D 98/10/0515:20:.15 B74A 96.4 D 98/10/121�:17:37 B74A 95.8 D 98/10/3106:37:02 B727 9�.8 D 98/10/2415:20:46 B74A 9�3 D RMT #19: 16th Ave. & �4th St Bloomington Date Tirr� ,�� M� A/D Level 98/10/18 06:12:01 B727 99.4 D 98/10/3106:20:30 B727 99.2 D 98/ 1'0/ 12 14:17:17 B727 98.3 D 98/10/I8 07:�1:18 B727 47.9 D 98/10/1910:�3:28 B727 97.? D 98/10/1910:Cb:52 I B727 96.8 D 98/ l 0/23 l 6:17:41 DC9 96.7 D 98/10/18 07:�7:31 B727 96.3 ( D 98/ 10! f 8 14:11:06 DC9 96.? D 98/ 10/0 I 1?:4S:0�1 B 737 96.0 D ItN1T #l�: 75th St & 17th Ave. Richfield �� IDe A/C Mas � i�ge Level 98/10/0515:19:52 B74A 106.4 D 98/10/2414:16:10 B727 105.8 D 98/10/0915:25:25� B74A 102.9 D 98/10/2316:19:16 B727 102.9 D 98/10/0615:22:39 B74A 102.7 D 98/1010815:09:00��` 74A 102.3 D 98/10/12 I5:17:14 �_- B74A 102.0 D 98/1O107 05:01:3� B72Q 101.9 D 98/10/1810:53:14 B727 101.0 D 98/10/18 08:23:�3 B727 100.8 D RiV�T #20: 7�th St. c� 3rd Ave. Richfield Date Time �c �� A/D 'I�pe Level 98/10/1810:53:36 B727 972 D 98/I0/231b:19:38 B727 96.6 D 98/10/07 05:01:57 B72Q 9�.7 D 98/10/21 12:4�:3Z B727 92.2 D 98/10/24 12:� 1:30 DC9 9 I.6 D 98/10/09 05:06:07 B72Q 91.3 D 98/10/21 12:�3:36 B727 90.9 D 98/10/3106:11:21 B727 87.9 I D 98/10/19 06:46:�� B727 I 87.7 D 98/10/181?:38:39 I DC9 87.I I D Note: .-1RTS dc�tc? missing jnr 0.-1 du�'.s. A� ia:i•�n \oi;e �� Sate1!i,. Pro�?rarti: Pa�e l9 C � Metropolitan Airports Commission 'Ten L�udest Aircrafi I�oise Even� Ide�tified R1YIT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th S� Inver Grove Heights Date Time �c Max � T`ype Level ' 98/10/3112:05:02 B727 91.8 D ' 98/10/03 13:?0:45 B727 90.9 � D- �+ 98/ 10/08 13:22:14 B729 90.4 `: D 98/10/0313:11:10 B72? 90.3 D 98/10/15 07:12:24 B727 90.2 - �D 98/10/OS 11:41:27 B727 893 '.�. D 98/10J09 20:52:40 B727 89.3 D 98/10/0211:50:06 B727 89.I D 9g/10/2919:52:58 B727 $9.1 D 98/10/08I3:30:18 B727 88.9 D RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave. Mendota Heighfs Date Time �� Max � Level 98/10/3112:03:52 B727 10�.7 D 98/10/16 20:�9:20 B727 10�.? D 98/10/16 23:24:09 B727 10�.0 D 98/10/0919:39:32 B727 10�.0 D 98/10/0511:�:26 B7?7 10�-t.� D 98/10/04 20:40:20 B7?7 lO�t.3 D 98/10/1413:?4:40 B727 10�-1.? D 98/ 10/ 16 10:02:53 B727 I 10�.1 D 98/1010� 21:19:�2 B727 10i.7 D 98/ 10/06 I!:46: I 0 B 727 I 03.7 ( D RI�IT #22: Anne Marie Trail Inver Grove Heights Date Time � �� A/D Level 98/10/0816:24:09 B727 90.6 D 98/10/1413:23:23 B73A � 88.7 D 98/10/09 07:30:00�= B727 88.5 D 98/10/0913:30:5� B727 � 88.1 D 98/10/OS 06:20:21 B727 88.0 D 98/10/14 13:36:42 -- B727 88.0 D 98/10/28 11:58:08 �. B727 87.9 D 98/10/09 07:36:59 B727 87.7 D 98/10/I111:39:08 B727 87.6 D 98/10/08 23:46:06 B727 $7.5 D RMT #24: Chapel Ln. $z Wren Ln. Eagan Date Time �e Level � 98/10/06 22:05:02 B727 97.8 A 98/I0/]006:12:42 B727 93.7 D 98/10/2�08:12:1� B727 93.� D 98/10/26 07:11:26 B727 93.5 ( D 98/10/03 07:1?:l� B7?7 92.7 D 98/I0/0814:14:29 B727 9?.1 D 98/10/1010:00:� I B727 I 91.8 D 98/l0/031=�:30:0� B727 91.4 D 93/10/0�' t-�:�6:�� B727 91.? ( D 9�/10/; I l':�9:10 B7?7 91? D Nnre: �,'TS darc� ,�ii.ssin; fnr U.=: clnr+. Pa�e ?O .;�•i•.!?ic,n ltioi<-, .� Satzllit� Pro�Tram< C� C� C x . Metropolitan Airports Commission Flight �ack �ase I�ap �irport I�oise and C�pet-ations 1VV�onitoring Sysiem A�: ia!ion �oi�,e �� $atellite Pro�rams � Pave ? I C C C , c C C � C C Metropolitan Airports Commission Ana�ysis of Aircraft I'�oise Events - t�ircr�ft Ldn d�(�) �Jctober 0� to �ctober 31, 199� Noise Monitor Locations Date #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #� #9 #10 #11 #12 1 60.2 61.3 64.2 62.5 70.1 71.3 65.2 65.3 5�.3 61.8 50.6 54.2 � 62.1 60.5 68.2 683 712 72.2 592 60.3 50.3 FA.3 55.7 50.6 3 60.2 61.8 66.0 63.8 �03 69.8 55.2 54.5 55.3 56.4 50.3 4b.3 4 65.4 68.3 69.9 68.1 ��73,:8 , 74.5 57.3 60.2 45.7 56.6 52.2 50.2 5 63.7 67.1 69.6 68S ,� 73.�:j 74.6 56.8 60.2 �8.4 ' 60.1 46.4 51.7 ( 63.8 66.0 67.6 692 76.0 793 69.4 69.6 54.3 60.6 51.2 54.1 � 62.2 63.8 66.8 69.1,. 75.2 � 79.4 71.9 69.7 41.9 58.6 54.4 52.3 $ 60.7 64.1 67.2 66.7 - 74.5 � 75.8 62.8 62.7 60.6 65.3 50.4 55.8 . 9 ,59.8 62.0 66.7 �4.3' 71.4 74.2 49.8 62.� 66;1 � 70.5 55.7 59.5 10 -�9.4 61.7 66:1 63.0 70.1 70.4 46.5 56.1 50.9 60.2 46.5 53.7 11 622 64.4 68.8 67.6 74:8` � 75.9 � 65.8 63.8 48.8 573 43.6 47.0 l? 60.2 62.9 65.7 67.3 76.0 * 71.4 67.0 44.5 53.7 52.1 51.4 13 63.3 63.0 66.9 67.7 75.7 77.5 69.1 66.8 4�.9 50.7 58.3 52.4 14 63.3 64.7 69.3 66.6 73.7 73.2 61.6 62.2 51.3 62.7 62.5 51.9 15 6�.1 67.2 71.2 68.8 74.6 74.6 58.5 64.3 48.5 60.8 58.5 53.6 1 6 64•8 67.0 70.1 68.3 74.4 75.1 54.0 63.7 57.7 62.4 55.9 55.2 1� 62.6 64.9 70.5 67.9 75.7 76.5 66.7 65.2 632 67.6 45.5 50.3 I$ 60.1 63.8 6�.3 70.2 74.2 79.8 67.6 69. I 47.3 5�.9 4b.9 562 19 �.6 64.2 66.3 68.0 * 782 71.1 69.6 45.4 53.5 51.5 56.4 2Q 63.9 64.6 65.7 68.6 74.9 79.3 70.3 68.5 50.7 51.7. 52.9 52.0 21 62.7 6�.2 673 69.3 76.7 79.9 71.2 73.2 462 47.9 48.0 49.9 22 58.0 62.2 66.2 67.7 7�.2 78.6 67.6 66.4 49.5 59.5 47.3 57.0 23 �9.4 62.2 67.5 67.� 7�.6 77.1 66.2 67.0 49.1 62.6 54.5 59.7 2q. 57.1 60.2 64.0 63.9 70.6 73.� 59.6 63.0 62.9 66.5 55.7 54.1 25 �7.2 60.0 64.4 61.9 ( 68.� 70.3 47.2 �7.1 � 1.8 58J 46.1 49.3 �6 59.3 62.3 66.1 I 64.4 70.8 71.9 51.0 �6.6 42.9 57.0 56.0 51.7 - 27 b�.7 64.2 68.1 68.6 7�.3� 78.5 69.7 67.7 ��.3 60.7 59.7 �8.8 2$ 61.7 66.5 68.0 66.7 73.� 73.7 61.9 �9.9 ��.9 61. f 54.5 53.3 29 6�.1 69.7 69.2 69.3 72.9 7�.2 �-'..6 >S.9 47.7 �7.4 6Q.9 53.7 30 b0•9 E�3.3 67.3 69.0 ( 7�.'_ 79.9 71.7 70.2 i0.? 49.4 49.5 5�.4 31 57.6 �9.� 63.3 I 61.0 67.6 68.� 61.0 >j.6 �1.8- � 57.6 5?.? 47.9 Mn. Ldn 62.0 6-1.5 67.5 67.; I 7;.9 76.5 Efi.7 E�.1 �6.3 61.6 54.9 54.2 Pase 26 Aviation Noisz �Yc Satellit� ProR;am, C � C� Nletropolitan Airports Commission Ar�alysis of A.ir�raft Noise E�ents -.Air�raft Ldn d�(A) October Ol to �ctober 3�., 199� Noise lYlonitor Locations Date #13 #14 #15 #16 #17 #18 #19 #20 #21 #22 #23 #24 1 62.6 66.7 71.6 74.b 54.2 50.6 49.0 52.6 62.9 62.7 75.4 67.4 2 60.0 63.3 63.2 71.4 53.0 55.6 48.8 47.8 57.0 62.8 70.5 63.2 3 63.0 70.4 63.6 72.0 �56.9 58.2 47.8 47.8 63.2 62.7 72.5 67.3 � 4 66.4 64.8 67.2 71.7 y. ' S79 59.9 45.8 493 62.8 61.3 " 74.4 67.7 5 63.6 62.8 683 71:1 � 55l�' 63.6 53.6 43.2 -fi1.4 61.1 76.3 64.2 6 60.3 65.1 62.4 * 58.9 65.0 63.1 54.3 62.4 60.9 71.2 67.1 7 47.6 62.5 57.6 69.,1 57.7. 71.6 67.5 64.9 41.8 60.6 59.0 64.7 $ * 65.8 68.4 73.5- 59.2' 62.8 5�.5 49.0 63.9 � 6�.8 77.3 68.9 9 66.6 68.8 69.3 72.4 60.4 69.4 5�.2 61.0 6�.0 64.6 77.4 67.1 10 ' b2.4 65.8 63.8 71.8 51.6 55.1 43.6 46.2 61.7 62.7 73.5 67.9 11 62.1 63.2 64.2 70.6 54:7 ' * 45.2 49.3 60.1 62.0 72.0 66.4 12 4b.4 62.5 57.0 68.7 63.6 69.7 69.0 60.1 51.3 58.0 60.2 62.6 13 57.8 61.7 61.2 71.� 59.7 612 54.6 55.8 60.2 62.0 70.9 64.9 1 4 65.5 70.1 67.9 73.0 59.7 66.6 �3.5 54.4 63.4 64.8 76.4 67.9 15 66.4 67.2 68.9 74.2 482 58.7 41.0 48.0 63.8 64.9 75.4 67.9 16 _ 57.6 66.7 71.6 73.6 50.3 49.6 43.0 52.6 62.9 62.7 78.4 67.4 17 60.0 68.3 62.2 71.4 �3.0 55.6 48.8 48.8 57.0 61.8 70.8 662 1$ 43.6 60.7 54.6 68.0 66.9 73.5 72.6 60.0 50.6 60.4 62.4 ' 64.6 19 50.8 * 5$.4 68.3 68.7 73.6 69.4 62.3 54.3 58.1 63.1 63.7 20 53.2 66.9 56.8 69.4 58.7 66.4 6�.4 56.8 49.1 59.1 63.0 63.9 21 48.2 67.0 52.4 68.3 56.7 6�.1 �7.3 56.4 50.� 58.9 62.5 64.0 22 51.1 63.� 59.2 66.7 4b.� �.7 �#b.4 50.4 52.� �7.8 65.5 62.6 23 62.4 67.7 66.0 71.7 59.-� 67.3 61.8 56.7 60.6 61.6 74.4 6�.8 24 62.6 69.6 62.7 71.3 �6.0 E�i.l �8.8 52.3 60.9 61.1 72.0 6b.0 25 64•� 70.3 66.3 7-�.0 61.0 �9.0 �8.6 4b.3 63.1 62.9 76.9 66.2 26 64.9 69.8 66.9 7-i.0 I�3. z �3.8 -?9.2 =�9.8 61.7 63.7 74.3 67.0 27 48.6 64.2 5�.0 69.� ».1 �7.? 50.8 5�.9 46.6 I 59.� 60.7 63.7 2$ 6�.1 70.7 67.6 73.� I �2.9 � * ��.� 5-�.1 61.9 61.4 74.7 67.� 29 6�.2 70.� 68.0 74.? ( S�.? � �9.4 �?.� �6.� 62.3 I 62.3 7�.7 67.�k 30 60.0 6-�.9 �6.6 68.9 �9.3 6��.4 I��.� I 57.1 =�7.9 61.3 59.1 64.7 3 1 61.1 67 4 6Z.6 ( 71.8 I 67.5 I 73.7 il.l i9.9 �9.4 I 60.0 73.4 64.0 Mo. Lcin 67.4 66.8 6�.1 71? ( 60.3 E6J 6;.3 56.5 60.3 61.7 72.9• - 65.9 Aviation \oi;e & Satelli[e Pro�?rams Pa�e 27 � C. i�ietropolitan A.irporu Commission Pr�posed 1�ortla �oundary Corr�dor ��te Penetrataon A.n�lysi� I�n�eapolis - �t. I��ll� Iii��'il`ci�lOgla� Ali'�'1O�'� � C)ctober 199� 4.0% (309) �arrier Jet I)epari�r�s t�Tort�i of Propose€� 095° (I'�) Corridor Policy �our�c�ary k �.. �.c.P " /. ' '--. �.� / E � Paae ? �1vi�tion i�oi.;e �, $atellite ProRram; C � Metropolitan Airports Cc�mmission � � �n�eapolis - St. Paul �nte�°n�tional Airpo�-� Octobe� 199� -C 75��... 'I'�t�l 12� �nd 12I2 ��rr�er Je� �epartures �06 ... �arrier Jei I�epartua-es 4.0%) 1Vorth of Pro�osed 095° (IVi) �orrit��r Policy ��und�ry aa 3Q0 I Rh��KS.' ��OS��J P_G=�; � . �.K � � r T CO�JiVT=2 (.0.77�)�a; RiG'r: � CGu�V i=3�= ��.37) � . � � ' � � :. oi ,f.; - � , . . . . �� . . . . , �----------------------------------------------------------------------------------�------------------------� o; _ i . :, , I s Qe • � � ! , . . ' • H e: I � ' ge°i: e p � I O ; ' e ' "'_'� O °� • ; 'J� ' """"' "e'A��S_ 0 "_"'"""""'__"""""""""""""""""_""" "'� s ee�e•""""_""' o: � 4� ,�e : c ; . ° , . o� e � i • � � • . �; e ' �� e } � e t e 1 Y_� a � ' e • d e r�- ; e � •e e°e • v8 ! �' ' -" ---" --•-------•'---'°.'g-��a--'•'----'---! '-' •-""-"""'-'-----'-"'---""'--"""'-----"---"- • d . . • e ^.7 �. , � � apa° � • �Oe • � e • � • I O � , " """"""" """"" _ """"""""""""""" """""" " "_ " """""""""""""""' _' ! O �:'�. � i � """' """""""""""""""""""""_"""....."_"""""""""""'""""""' O """"" ' I '. n, _ � : . _ - - ' ; y , ' _ J v ,� � � � . , � . ., ,, _ - - " ' - ' - . G U 'v .. -- - -, _ i,i , -: _ - - - � -_ .��iatic�- \oise �� Sa[ellite Fogram� Pane 3 Metropolican Airports Commission 1�Iinr��apolis - Si. Pa�l �nte�-n�tional A.irport Oc�ober �.998 75c��..e i'o�al 1�L a�d 12� C�a-rier �e� Dep�riures 3 ... Carrier ,�ei Dep�riur� - E�riy '��-nou� {0.0 % ) (l�o�t� Side �efor� 'Thr�e 1��les) a� 3 T��C�KS..CROSS`J �-G� � � �, �� FT COU�VT=O .(.O.C�i � R��,; � CO��-=? ':��.C7' � -- �. _ ; i �, � �� . � .. i :: ,. � . ° i ''�� O � s: . ' " �'L _ ""'"""""""' _ ""'""' _""""""_ ""' _ _"""_ """""""""""""""""""""""' ""' c � - i . • O j O i """'""""'"""""""""_"_"'_"""""""".."""""""""""'"""'""""" ' OI ""' """'""""' �i I rJ' . �� ' """""""""""""'""""""""""""""' """'"'""""""'"""_' � � . """"""""""""""""". :'�. � 1 I � � " " " " " "_" " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " -." " " " " " " " " " " • " " " " " " " " " " " " " " - O i _ , n' � n ^, - - - ^, n � ' U n .. �v ',: ti v ., ., v � ., .; V �.. .. � ii � � - - " ' - �� . ; . - _ - ' • _ � , � _ . , .. � _ � .. _ � _ . . _ -. _ i P�°� � A�•iation i�c�i,e c� Sa[ellite Pro�ra��>> C hletropolitan Airports Commission Sou��ern �ounda�-y Corridor �� neiraii�� .nalys�s I�na�e�polis - �ta Pa�l In�er��t�o�al �i�°p�rt <� f'�• ,''': �.0% (74) C��rier Jet I��part�res So�aih o� Corrid�r (Sout� of 30I� �.,�calizer) aa ,A��iatii�n tioi;e �� Sa[ellite FoRram� Pa�e � ' i�fe[ropolitan Airports Commission . I�nne�po�is - S�. P�ul Internatior��l A�.��-port C�ct�ber 199� 7584... �oi�l 12L and 12� Carrier J�t �epa�tures 6� ... Carrier J�t I�epart�res (0.9 % ) South of C�rridor (South of 30L I�oc�l�zer) a; �8 -.�`��-S• ��OS�� -�A � � . �, L�- COu:V �=c� j: „u.C�.�) RiG�- CO�� _ Q(C.u%' a - ; �, , :a ; , , e i .. ; - , �; , _ ,, . O � � ° � ""'""""""__""""""�"""""""""""""_""""_"""___""""_"' _"'_""""""""" O � 7' • � � t . � • • . 0 � s �' "'_"'_"""i""""""""i""""""""_""""""'_"""'"""'_"""""""'"""""""" � � -- � c: 8 •m o • . . i y e o • . • e •• . �° • �� 4 i � o O �a ° � • � O , ! � " " " '...._g�o'.? ..................." " " � ._.." " " " " " " " ..P- """..."""""""' """"""...-� v� • • o• �� S�� • i I 0 � � ---------•---- — --.._..,----•-------------_�-------•---- ---------•----------------------------------- — --- � I 0 � ; � -------------------------------._...............-------------•------------------------------------------- i + �J v L _ � � _ _ . . . . - _ � � ` � J v � 1J v V ✓ .. . - � . _ I� _ � - : _ : � . _ : 1 � _ r . � � r � _ � _ . _ „ � _ i Pa�e b ,��iation :�oi<z :.� Sateilite F'rogram, C� ivtetropolitan Airpons C�mmission I�Iinne�po��s - St. P�ul �nter�atio�al �irpoz-� October 199� 75�4... 'To�i 12� and �2� ��rr�er Je� �epari�res 6... Car��er Jei Departures - Ea�-ly '�rr��i (�.1 %) (Sout� Side. �e%re 'I'hree I1�Iiles) ;a: � "3A�'��-��£�OSSED �-�A�� I ��iti� =l; ��.��;�.�; Ki� L�il�� _� � vu.�i � 0 o ; �+ ' . j o fi . .. � a ` ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- =-------------� � o . �,� " � ' • s i . • I o � ' � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ . , � � � �, -., ,--.,, ; i � — i � i '�J �—� '� .--�� '�7 _ _'"""""""..._.."'""" """"""" .""'"""""""'"" " "" ""'""" ..._..'""'_""" " '""""'"""'"_'"'"""""'"""""""".........7 . � O "7 s ' i C � I Q i , � ------ "- —..,---•'---" -'------'--------'-- " '------' � _.._'-------'---------'-""--'_..--"'----"---'--"--- � � � � i p „ v """•"""""""""""'....""""""""""""""""...""""""""""""""""""""', � I . „ .� n 't - ., ,� - __..... _ - n n .. , n n � n � .. � .. ., � � .. - .. � .l � .i �v V '� � _ � ', .,. � � - . '� � `' - 1 � " - - " � , ' - ' ' . A�•iatior: \oise 8: Sateilite Fo_*ram� Pa�e 7 Meu-opolitan AiTports Commission Sou�hern ��undary �orridc�r ��e Peneiration �nalysis IVlanr�e��olis - St. Pa�l �nter��ti�r��l Airpori October 1995 0.3 %(20) C��-r�e� Jet Departures 5° ,�outh o� �orridor (5° Soui� of 30L Lo�calizer) �a Page 8 A�•iatiun i�'oise � Sa[elli�e Proaram> , Metropolitan Airports Cc�mmission IVlinneapolis - ��. P�u� Internaiional Airpor� October 199� 75�4 oas '�'otal 12L and �2I2 Carr�er Jet I)epartur�s �4 ..e Carrier Jei I)��rtures (0.2% 5° 5'oa��h of Corridor (5° South of 30L Locaiizer) ��. ; � 4 � Ra�"K�� ,�,ROSS�u �—Ga � E �"' � 1�� ! tr I COUNT=1� (lu"�.u%�� R1�-� ��;1�Ui=u ,�.u%1 � :o i �' � � i e: , . ; I : � i o i ,., � ' ` . � o; : •� , . �----------------------�-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• , a, �; ,.. . -. ; � �. I � � � ' �, � . , . o . . � ------------------'------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ � j O i • I �i , . . , � ;� � ,___- e 0 0 — . '= `� :-----•--------- ---•----------••-------•----------------•---------...— -------- — ••------ -----....._.......: c� ; • — � o. = e i � � � � i 0 � ----------•---------------- ' a------------------------------------------------------------�-- -----------------i r�: ' i O . � , O' " """"""""""""""' _""""""""""' _""I :, ^"""""""'...""..."""" """"""""' a ' i I � � v �J �J � � v V V C .. .. - - � �. - _ 1 � �v .+ V � U �J • - 1� ' � " ' - � �J _ � .. � � _ � ., ., ' _ ' _ - ' 'l �' , A�•iation tioise & Satellite Fosrams Paee 9 , Metropolitan Airports Commission 1�n��apolfs - �t. �a�� International A�r�ort C)ctobea-199� � 75�� ... T'otal 12I, �nd 12� Carrier Je� I.�ep�rt�ures 6... C�rrie� Jet Depart�res - Early liarnout (0.1 %) (South Side �efore T`�ree IVliles) a� � n T��.�'��(S�„�ROSSED ?–GAi� � ! � � `FT �aUi�� _� ��.�% i14 r�iv�� I '' � _� �•'�� :,� � . . ), �OJ�Ni ; ��.��:; �� . . �, , : i .. : ; ... , ; � , . � �� , � : -. o� : ,, .. : : . ; ; . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=--------------� o; --�;. . . _ ,., � . . � �_ � a , �� , . , �-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� : � , � � � � � ,--- � _ a� � � . �= ------�---------------------------------------------�------------------------------...----------�----------..: : � � — � e ; c � I � , � i , -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------; , � , I � ; � � I � : , � , , � ; � -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------� � i — � � � - �� -�� , ��_ �uC� I J _ �'� . � � ' ' �i' .. . , � _ � � ' ' _ � I . Pa�e 10 A��iation Noise �t Satellite Pro�*rams C �" �\. �� s z = ; , r . . =r � ,�� = ��.�5�.� �1�� 1�5�11�°1 ;;. strateby an�. mechanisms ,;... for advoc�.�ing on behalf of individual he National League of Cities (�`TL,C) 1998 Congress of Cities & Exposition will take place in Kansas City fro� December 1-5. I�tOI�E wi11 hold its ;-a.nnual winter m.eeting �� nd�complimentary brunch on Friday December 4, 1998 from 9:OOam - 12:OOpm at Room 2207 of the Kansas City Convention �enter. During the meeting, I�t��S� will determine organizational priorities for the upcoming yea� as well as deve�op a national lobbying comr�unitie.�. �, .. Please return the enclosed regisiration form to our Washin.gton D.C. of�ice if you would 1'.�e to attend the -winter meeting. Please include any comments or suggestions for organizational priorities and strategies for 1999. Also, if you know of prospective ��5� members who should be invited to the meeting, please coniact Scot� Shrum in our Washington D.C. office �.t (202/434-8163). �.�.5^,,.+.,�s`.` _ . ,�L�:+; � �,�T,e ;d•a-a*f":t�c >�v .sav .h -S� ,�+ ts �;z <�'�' t-tir:x.iG�:,.. ' `.p,,; .,+,:.� x � -•`_ _R'-5,.�.�:s 3L''n�+r�l{3� �� r".u`z`i{, v-?.:. • Fh3J'L, s+" }g. >�" F �N-� S`F� a'i3r, 'S .� ..r�`L.t r,s F .�v� �. Y^-�+�t;.'�c._5:5� .�i �t=�,}< r� ,�Ga,�a.s ... � z uw; .� t r � �. �u.��ti .. %,.�.., �� .E, y .�` `� �'S�-tt ° �: ' ..,."��.' . `•. �t �r h� ` r � "`� :;,..,?�. �`,� �s.9„-rt ;A��;_, r?.;�;� ,�,-r r �-+ .,y� ��art'i >'��:��- ��. �x��{'��'�;,�'0��::?l�fi�r�5��'t��r�t,,�,tv�'�? .�s, � � �.w''i�.��..R.�t ��'�.r. ?��'-�°��.J�" �..�._r.'�..�y�.'u��,'{^..:�a t��.,.ii'1� T,.r' a i_� r'?��-"'t�'��,'�.-'�''i� y�u�1t's`�..r.^r'i��.:,. �"; :h 4. �'� 4_ � sHl.K��^,�:;5?�f�,.�-�"`:�'.S.S-' i.�a.�� n 1�c�,� �� ,. r�i £'u'c': :3`.�_'�N t7,r�`�C-�°�I `.w t41."Y �i �i�t'k2�� t'M3 �"r� ??i `H �.. 'te�� _ � �. �� Continued from Pa�e One Commission (MAC) which i operates the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, to study the impact that ground noise would have on Richfieid homes next to the new runway. When MAC refused to study low frequency noise, Richfield paid for an independent noise study by BBN Systems and Technologies of Canoga Park, California. The study determined the following: At least 4,000 residents or 11 percent of the City's population, two schools, two churches and more than 100 businesses will be substantially impacted. At least 1760 residential units and 35 businesses wiil have to removed to allow noise mitigation redevelopment to take place. The Richfield School District could � lose up to 486 students due to noise impacts. _ • Substantially elevated low / � freq��ency noise levels will be l � -- experienced up to a mile from the iunway that would affect 9,000 residents. An acoustic barrier, such as a noise wall or berm, of sufficient size to provide effective low frequency noise reduction for eastern Richfield is not realistic, and current insulation and sound proofing programs will not relieve these impacts. Low frequency noise esposure, which wili be imposed on the eastern one-third of Richfield, has been the basis for noise complaints and remediation acti�•ities in communities near other airports. Richfield spent rivo years making phone calls, requests and writing letters pleading for MAC to study the issue and identify proper miti2ation. The Draft and Final Environmental Impact Statements for the . rumvav project failzd to address or i _ recognize important potential impacts and labeled low frequency noise impacLs as an "unresolved issue." Because of the resistance to address this foreseeable impact, Richfield was forced to hire a team of experts to analyze impacts overlooked in the EIS and to formulate proposals for appropriate mitigation measures. The team found that the EIS had failed to properly address, suggested inadequate or no mitigation for 14 out of 33 impacts, and failed to consider 4 additional impacts or concerns. Richfield's exposure to low frequency nuiway sideline noise from aircraft operatior�s on or near the ground while taxiing, taking off, thivst reversers on landing, and engine maintenance run-ups was the most glaring omission. On June 1998, the City of Richfield submitted an environmental mirigation proposal for inclusion in the Environmental ImpacC Statement (EIS) for the new runway. �Vhen the Record of Decision was released by the FAA on September 30, again there was no mitigation for low frequency �ound noisz included in the EIS. The FAA said in its Record of Decision that "In the case of ]ow frequency noise, no adverse impacts have been determined." i�iAC has contended that the FAA precluded a discussion of low frequency noise in the IS because there were no standards for measuring this type of environmental impact. However, Richfield learned from the Airport Noise Report that the FAA approved fundinQ for low frequency noise mitigation at the Baltimore-iVashington Airport. At the Baltimore-Washington AirQort, noise insulation ti��ill be provided for homes located 3300 feet from the end of a rumvay. Richfield homes would be as close as I Z00 feet from tne end of the proposed runwav. Both the �L�C and 1oc21 officials have dznied any l:nowledge of lo�v frequency noise miti?ation at Baltimorz-�'✓ashington Airport or tae study that zstablished the luw frequenc}• noise s�andard. That study was conducted b}� iviAC's own noise consultanc, Haris-�filler Vliller & Hanson (HivIMH). Other conmunities around the country are also struggling with low frequency noise issues, including communities nect to airports in San Francisco, Boston and Los Angeles. Getting airport proprietors to deal with low frequency noise issues is made more difficult because the FAA's metrics and standards have been developed for overflight noise. Overflight noise, characterized by a high frequency screeching sound, is measured on a A- weighted scale. Low frequency noise is measured on a C-weighted scale. According to noise consultant HN1iYIH, the A-weighted scale that is used to measure high frequency noise and is a part of the federal DNL standard de-emphasizes low frequency noise. The FAA funding for low frequency noise at Baltiinore-Washington has set a standard that Richfield is pointing to as it meets with federal FAA officials, congressional representatives and state leb slators. Because the Record of Decision is the federal approval for runway construction, the clock is ticking. Richfield may be forced to take legal steps to biock construction until it is assured of adequate noise mitigation. "It has never been our position, or the posicion of the City of Richfield, to stop the expansion of the airport," said Audrey Duffee, a spokesperson for the 1,000- member erass-roots group CARE Team — "Caring Citizens Concerned About Richfield's Environment." "We only ask that in exchange for the ` airport to expand operations and increase its revenue many-fold; that residents and businesses of Richfield receive what they are lawfully entitled to — miti�a�ion from the si�nificant adverse envirorunencal impacts of airpori operations," Duffe� said. For more information, contact Daw�n �Veitzel at 612-561-9716. x� �� _ �, �: � . � . �. � ,�.�� y �x. �:�L��`�j'".t'�a .,�'�k�t'},s� .�:ry-4,Yj;: .M'�.��y r�.� ��n .. �� e"`'� ::v u'r "'' a'' r. �� , � `� 1� ,�`'� y`�w �.xb � � ��3� a.�,�...t��'�y�,'�.L`��rw'�, „ '�- - .-�-,..i^ -,ai� - . =a7 „ s .:;.�� e „ r n,�r t •� � �.�e xS; � �nr,,..u::c;�+' � � z-r�: E h+ �a -�i,�i �rv y,�'.tn �.,r�" `"-.: � +x�,'Y %h+s��i ,�r�t�,c- ✓7 i;,y;lr . �i."y''. r . ac'. r'L�,; �'� � F�4�`� � "'� � �`'.'��x � �1 . rr.t},t'��'A�t� �v:"<va+�:,n . M `3�� rY�!H � Q�'`,.�,:`' ; ) ff ��,^r� ,; � _F..i�( �s� r , . ;ii7rt`.'��ti ,.c' .r, sA`U-�F:t,.yts , 4i . y 5 i,,.�,i;1'�".� v .. ,� � ,��:Xt; fi e2�'Zc G % a -i•4.•: , e'.y�.';.�t?.s5�'i:j �.�£�-2X��. y;�'Yi'J". � �.. .-�=x;'}+�''�"'a�.t�rF ''�� 'iA � :'�!"', �3��! ..:��'� . `$,`+�.. . F tv f4 "�°�s�;. t� �"��C.;1' ;i�� i� ;IS tiz�'-'x . G, ��. sig : � �, .1�., r.� �q'� , '� �"�.�sl-�� L��'-.z ,,.� ��. ;,' fi � � �'<u i "�+ .r"�' ,,,�� ^��, _�r �� I ; . "� �F`�"-, > �� =d',s�'.r„�r� ,,� �+.�..u�a�;Y�`�,��4 . �.'�i.,x��F4:�u.�;.-�.,,.�. ,.�,�r�N.�: ,.�, �,. �'..�-,..«w,.n1r._.!,..a�v`t�� e,.�'�:,: a�w. ��..r�..4�t,.�'"-,:.'t�_ [,^'�t°i.�..�.Y,�taet�r...,.,. .�3....�. .:�. ti...-,. � r The length of the FAA reauthorization bili proved to be a very acrimonious issue between the Senate and House at the close of this legislative session. The final compromise reached in the Omnibus Consolidated & Eme,encv Supplemental Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1999 (PL 105-277) was a six-month reauthorization through March 31, 1999. Consequently, the Airport Improvement Program will only be funded for another si.c months while legislators try to agree on a longer bill. Obviously, this is a source of . concern for both airport officials and the Transportation Deparhnent. Another contentious issue in b.oth the Senate and House were provisions for increased flights at four major airports: Ronald Reagan National, La Guardia, Kennedy and O'Hare. After considerable opposition from legislators ara constituents, these controversial - � 'sions to increase flights at the four major airports were omitted from the final bili. However, it is clear that Senate Cornmerce Chairman John MeCain (R- A.Z) will reintroduce these exemptions to the slot and perimeter rules during next year's legislative session. House Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Bud Shuster (R-PA) and Ranking Member James Oberstar (D- MN) are intent on overhauling the airline industry in much the same way as they revamped the hiahway and mass transit system with this year's TEA-2l Act. In addition to a more serious reevaluation of aviation issues, one of their top priorities next year will be to open up the Aviatiora Tn�st Fund. The short FAA reauthorization presents both a challenge and an opportunity for our orQanization. It will be important for �tOISE to position itself next year to ensure that AIP funding continues to be adequate and that noise mitigation issues z �t solely determined by legislators. F'u.-�riermore, Congressional leedership appears ready to make significant changes that will have a direct impact on noise reduction efforts, and NOISE has an excellent opportunity to be a part of this process and influe�je these decisions and changes. , ,�� L�v.. "�..m �' ' . �H � � � ��i � ;` �� '�� z il +�, YAz>.. tcn S - �, i�r, .�' Sisx-'x++ When�will•it Stop? Leave our Regional Airport System Alone! Tl:e following lvas submitted by Bertv Ann Krahnke, Chair af COG Committee on Noise Abatement at tVationat and Du11es Airports and member of the Montgomery County Council. Nis. Krahnke is also a merrber of the 1VOISE Executive Board. Why must our airports continue to be congressionai chips? ' Having carefully planned the future of our region's airports, the Washington-Balti- more area should not have to wrestle again and again with ill-advised, f derally imposed airport �rowth. Residents and visitors to the region should be enjoyin� the new Ronald Reagan Washington ?`tational Airport terminal and the fruits of expansion at Dulles and BWI. Instead, we are again fighting attempts by a handful of members of Congress who wish to abrogate the 1981 compact with this region upon which the airport improvements and the region's expanded air service choice is based. The perimete: and high-density, or slot, rules were formalized in 1951 to balance szrvice between the re;ion's three major airports. National has the most convenient location for the majoriry of visitors, but it is also a physically restricted airporc. The hvo rules work to balance service ber.veen Natio�al ane Dulles and BWI, and benyeen National and its neighbors. They also serve to increase safety and reduce delays at National. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) defines airline competition by looking at only one airport. The proposed changes to National's rules would break long-standing ae-reements, increase noise endured by our communities, and would fly in the face of years of regional planning overseen and endorsed by the Metropolitan Washing- ton Councii of Governments' Committee on Noise Abatement at National And Dulles Airports (CflNANDA). Our communities are envied nationwide for haviri� solved airline growth and competi- tion on a regional basis at three airports— National, BWI, and Dulles. We have spent many years and many federal,`state, and local dollars on planning, noise mapping, noise monitoring and radar flight trackina equipment, land-based transportation improvements, and housing and economic development policies—all of which support improvements at Narional and growth at Dulles and BWI. We regret Senator MeCain's narrow definition of competition. Thanks to our Congressional delegation and Representative Iienry Hyde (R-IL), we received some relief from this on-going fight led by Senator MeCain was still able to remove dollars from the budget to fund improvements at National and Dulles that implement our reQional growth plan. CONANDA members are locally elected official and citizens who grow tired of fighting to solidify and enforce the terms of the airport's transfer to the NSetropolitan F Washinb on Airports AuthorSty (MbV�,A). i�f WAA shares our view that it makes no sense to increase the number of fli¢hts or the flight distances of planes leaving National Airport. Our regiona': aizport, ground transportation, and plannin� all direct increased flights and larger aircraft to the expanded (and expandable) Dulles and BWI. Don't gamble our reeion's future on a narro«� aeenda. �. . _ . ._ � _ - 1 _, �,. ��i~��'M�.� �� ..: K � .,. �. ,^:�� IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN ATTENDING THIS YEA.R'S WINTER MEETING IN KANSAS CITY, MO, PLEASE FAX THE FOLLOWING ONE-PAGE REGISTRATION TO OUR WASAINGTON DC OFFICE OR CALLAND REGISTER i . . FAX:202-b39-8238 PAONE: 202-�34-8163 FACSTNiILE TRANSMIT"I'AL SHEET FOR IMMEDIATE DELIVERY TO: DENNIS MCGRANN (202/639-8238) a . NOISE EXECUTIVE DIItECTOR FR: - " �+ RE: DECEIviBER 4, 1998 WINTER MEETING IN KANSAS CITY � I am interested in attending this year's NOISE winter meetuig and breakfast at the annual National League of Cities {NLC) conference in Kansas City, MO on December 4, 1998 from 9:00 am -12:00 pm. Please send me any available informarion regarding the conference and meeting. . . NAME: ADDRESS: PHONE: �, ,�: MEMBER CITY/ORGANIZATION: COMMENTS: ,' :�� ,r N:�,, `Cr?'�'i_ :�;=i � u �-�;.:'�e�`e�..n ' �� ' � Y` ;�'': ;:�1 `� � • ;. `,,...� ._._.<. �,.._.......,,.,--.--.,.---�...>��_ :.,�a„i:- :.; --�; � ::� --.. . ..'.% - -.�._. . .' 1ji-�5:_ .� .. fi .. � �< �..._ _.. P�A�'90NA� 4�RGAP1��7'i0� 'a'O IP�Sl9ftE A S6�t��d� C0��2�1.�,�� Es'�3!lI�2��i�Ei�i 5U1TE 900, SOUTH BUILDING 601 PENNSYLVANIAAVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON DC 20004 TELEPHONE :(202) 434-8163 FACSIMILE: (202) 639-6238 E-MAIL: DMMCGRANN@LOCKLAW.COM Kevin Batchelder ' City Administrator 1 ] 0'1 Victoria Curve Mendota Heiahts, i�1i� 55118 Address' Correction Requested I�dSl�3� o°+aO9S� �1l��'�i� PJl��ift"dG ��i�riiJA31'T'I iAI 'T�-J� S��i3..3��-li: 3��3-3�i��.P.�, i1iil�d�3�S0�'� �i3��' ��1'iO3�1�11. ` ,, �i E :i: it �; >>; t �..:?:...,...:} ...................... _...............�i'..... ri. . 'w � .. AGENDA �- �: ; . � :� �`, •-..: � J 1 CITY OF EAGAN ' � .. _ �.�'� ,:.Il � EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION •� A � .. ; ;,,- EAGAN, MINNESOTA '� -.,*��,� , EAGAN CITY COUNCIL CgiAIVIBERS I)ECEMBER 8,1998 7:00 P.M. k ( . I. ROLI� CALL AND ADOPTIt71N OF AGENDA II. APPI�O VAL O��' MTNUTES III. VISITOI�S TO BE I3EARD ' . IV. UNFINISHEI� BUSINESS A. Request for Temporary Noise 1!'%onitor - B. ]Position Re�ding Waivers for Stage II Phase-Out Requirement V. NEW BUSINESS A. 1999 Work Program VI. STA�F REPORT A. ]Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor B. MASAC Update C. North/South Runway Update D. Part 150 Update E. Legislative VII. I1�IFORMA'I'IVE 'VIII. NEXT MEE'�'ING A. Regular Commission 1Vleeting — Tuesday, January 12 at 7:00 p.m. • IX. ADJfOURI�INIEN'I' Auziliary aids far persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. - 1999 SAC � C E �TLE Janua�y 26, 1999 �, � Febru �:�'�J 23 1999 � _ ,..- ��""` J % �: .� _. - � ~. � , i� _ � IVlarch 23, 1999 : .� ' .. . .r . .� � , j t.-:_ , . .. . . . . , . l } . � .., , . . ,. :April 27, � l 999 � - - - � . - May:_ZS, r1999 . � June 22, ,1999 - J�ly 27, 1999 1�ug�st 24, 1999 Septemlaer 2�, 1999 Octobe� 26, 1999 December 7, 1999 METROPOLIT�N AIRCRAF"T SOUND ABATEtYIENT COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP ROSTER Chairman: Bob Johnson (1-23-97) First Vice Chair: John Ne3son, Bloomington Second Vice Chair: Mark Salmen, NWA USER REPRESEI+ITATION REPRESENTATIVE ALTERNATE Airborne Express Brian B'ates Michael Anderson Airbbrne Express Airborne Express 2120 MT� Road 830 Boone Ave. No. Muu�eapdtis, MN 5�4�0 _ Golden Valley, MN 5�4Z7 (612) 726-1564 (612) 541-4834 Delta Air Lines Inc. DHL Worldwide Express �� Federal E�press Mesaba North�i�est Airliril: Larry Gcehring , � Supervisor Airport Delta Air Lines, Inc. MSP International Airport St. Paul, MN 5� 111 (612) 725-4936 (B) (612) 892-0�99 (I-� Brian Simonson 2906 N. 2"d Street Minneapolis, MN 5�411 (612) 521-1261 Dan DeBord Federal Express 7301 26th Ave. So. Minn�apolis, hfN >j-��0 (612)794-3110 Phil Burke iviesaba North«�est Airlinl: 7�01 26th Avenue South Niinneapolis, hiN ��4�0 (61?} 726-� I i I Rostcr `CTpeated: 10-?2-98 Rich Kidwell � Station Manager Delta Air Lines, Inc. MSP Intemational Airgort St. Paul, MN �5111 (612) 72�-4979 (B) (612) 431-2976 (I-� Robert Maddiex 1066 Gemini Road Eagan, MN � � 121 (651) 681-0119 Tom Rheineck Federal Express 7301 26�' Avenue S. MlnneapOlis, MN J54J0 C C United Parc�l Service i�� } Northwest Airlines Inc. Michael Gever UPS 7�3� 1 26th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN ��4�0 (612) 726-�6�7 Jennifer Sayre Director.,State Affairs and Airport Access NWA, Is►c. - Dept. A1120 S 101 �Northwest Drive St. Paul, MN 55111-3034 (612) '726-��963 (B) _ (612) 726-7947 FAX - Ma�k J. Sa�nen ,.iVlgr., Airport Operat-ions ,. Northwest A.irlines Dept. N7310 � 101 Northwest Drive St. Paul, MN >j 111 �034 (612) 727-4019 (B) (612) 727-76�4 FAX Nancy Stoudt Airport Analyst Northwest Airlines S 101 North�vest Drive, Dept. N7310 St. Paul, MN �� 111-30 y4 (612)726-4687(B) (612) 727-�654 FAX Steve Holme Director, Customer Sen�ice��- Ground 2viSP Nor�h��est Airlines � 101 Northti�,�est Drive, Dept. D>j�0 St. Paul, MN >j 111-30 �4 (612) 726-2��1 (B) (bl?) 727-4688 FAX �' � Jane Fre�man UPS 74� 1 26`� Avenue So. Minneapolis, MN ��4�0 � � 3un Country Airlines TWA Inc. United Airlines Inc. � � --' USAirways Inc. Minnesota Business Aircraft Association (MBAA) Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) Gordon Graves VP Maintenance & Engin�ring Sun Country Airlines 2�20 Pilot Knob Road Mendota Heights, MN 55120 (6� 1) 681-3900 Ext. 3806 . � Kevin Black United Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 66200 — WHQSY Chicago, IL 606b6 (847)700-7603 (847)700-7269 Lam� E. Yandle US A.irways, Inc. MSP International Airport St. Paul, NfN » 111 (612)726-�374 Robert P. Johnson . 8824 18th Ave. So. Bloomington, MN »42� (612) 8�4-8032 Ron D. lohnson 2030 Ro}'ale Drive Eagan, NiN » 122 (6�1) 686-b72�1 (I� ; T.J. Horsager Manager, Engin�ring Sun Country Airlines 2�20 Pilot Knob Road Mendota Heig.hts, MN 5� 120 (6�1) 631-3900 E�ct. 3817 •. .- � , � . :�� ` I ,�. ;��.:. , ..,,�. ��►`._ �:- •- . .. i � S � , � � �' Dwight Kirk Customer Service Manager United Airlines Tnc. MSP International Airport St.Paul, MN 5� 111 (612) 726-5084 L,� Nacon USAirways Inc. 1�iSP International Airport St.Paul, MN 5� 111 (612) 726-5374 Phil Stringer 1382 Cherry Hill Road hiendota Heights, MN �� 118 (6� 1) >j2-0926 Charles W. Curry 7r. 1013� Waterfront Drive Woodbury, MN » 129 {6��) 730-9943 (I-� C � C i Metropolitan Airports Commission (IviAC) Greater Minneapolis Chamber of Commerce St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce � Dick Keinz Director of Environment MAC 6040 28th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN ��0 (612) 726-8134 ��. w� .. John Smith'= Director of Transportation General M��S, __ One Gener �d. 55426 ( " -79� 1 (B) (61-�) �40-4937 FAX , Rolf Middleton 1406 Edgecumbe Road St. Paul, MN �510� (6� 1) 690-1�90 (i� 5 Nigel Finney Deputy Executive Director Plazuiing & Environment NLAC 6040 28th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN >j4�0 (612)726-8187 C� C� C °UBLIC REPRESENTATION REPRESENTATIVE ALTER]`dATE City of Minneapolis Steve Minn Nathae Richardson 350 South 5�' Street 4920 4`� Avenue S. Room 307 Minneapolis, MN ��409 Minneapolis, MN »41� (612) 824-85�7 (I-� (612) 673-2213 (B) (612) 341-6291 (B) (612) 925-9�0� (I� Cit�� of St. Paul Joe L�i' 381a, Abbot� Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 55410 (612) 926 '�908 Sandra Colvin Roy 3�0-South 5�' Street ,..Room 307 Minneapolis, MN 5�41� (612) 673-2212 (B) (612) 722-2274 (� Glenn Strand � 1 � E. Minnehaha Parlcway Minneapolis, MN �5419 (612) 824-1941 (H & B) Dean Lindberg 533� 39�' Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN JJ417 (612) F23-1977 (H c�'. B) Mike Cramer �407 26`f' Avenue South Miru�eapolis, Nii�t »417 John Halla 1872 ti�'ellesle�• Avenue St. Paul, NfN »10�-161� (6� 1) 6�9-09� � (I-� (612) �-18-9689 (� Dick Saunders 5610 Clinton Avenue S. Minneapolis, MN ��419 _- (612) 861-1061 (I-� (612) 869-1501 (B) Neil Clark �917 Grass Lake Terrace Minneapolis, MN 5�419 (612) 869-0891 (I� (612) 869-5614 (B) Leo C. Kurtz 4916 11�' Avenue South Muineapolis, MN �5417 Carol Ann McGuire 610 Wanvick St. Paul, NiN 5�116-1�4C {�;5 i ) 699-7143 (I� C City of Richfield Kristal Stokes Michael Sandahl 6700 Portland Ave. 7601 Bryant Avenue Richfield, MN >j423-2�93 R.ichfield, MN 5�423 (612) 861-9700 City of Bloomington _�.. Da«-n Weitzel 6700 Portland Ave. Richfielit, MN 5�423-2�98 (612�'561-9a00 H, 1i Petrona Lee Manager Environmental Services Cit� of Bloomington 2215 W. Old Shakopee Road ,.Bloomington, MN 5��31 (612) 948-8970 / 945-8949 FAX „ Vern Wilcox; Councilmember Cin� of Bloomington 8900 l lth Ave. So. Bloomington, MN 5�420 (612) 673-6b�7 (B) (612) 8�4-142� (I-� City of Mendota Heights Jill Smith ' 62? Hampshire Drive I�Sendota Heights, MN �� 120 (6� 1) 688-7444 (� _ (6�1) 4�2-18�0 (B) Kz��in Batchelder Cin• of t�iendota Heiahts 1101 Victoria Curve I��fendota Hei�hts, N1N >j 118 (6� 1) 4�2-18�0 (B) F;�.� (6� 1) 4�2-8940 0 Mark Hinds 6700 Portland Avenue Richfield, MN ��423 (612) 861-9708 . John K. Nelson Sr. Env. Health Specialist City of Bloomington 22�1� W. Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 5�431 (612) 948-8972 / 948-8949 FAX Steve Bianchi 9641 Moms Circle Bloomington, MN 5�437 (612) 83�-1741 (I� (612) 830-7078 (B) Mayor Charles Mertensotto 2371 Rogers Avenue Mendota Heights, MN » 120 (651) 454-3394 (F� (651) 4�2-18�0 (B) Scott Beatv 800 Havenview Court 1��lendota Hei�hts, MN �� 120 (6� 1). 4�2-9028 (B) City of Eagan City of Burnsville Bob Kimvs (temp) City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Ea2an, MN 5� 122 (6.i 1) 681-4600 (B) -� Lance Staricha 389� Newtown Court Eagan, MI�I 5� 123 (6�1) 68'b-6208 (I-� ��. Cliarles Van Guilder 209 Valley High Road Bumsville, MN 55337 (612) 890-2349 (I-� ,- . City of Inver Grove Heights y City of St. Louis Park City of Sunfish Lake Mr. Charles W. Eginton l�.High Road Inver Grove Heights, MN »077 (6� I) ��2-1010 (I-� Robert Andre�vs 232� Parklands Road St. Louis Park, MN »416 (612)332-8�0�-B (612)922-8�30-H Glenda D. Spiotta, Ciry Administrator Cin� of Sunfish Lal:e % 116� Merrifield Court Shal;opec;, I�•1�1 >j379 (612) �#4�--�02� FA.� (612) 4�1>-614 � 6 � Jane Vanderpoel 960 Savannah Road F,agan, MN � � 123 � Craig Peters 13824 York Avenue S. Burnsville, MN �5337 (612) 89�-158� (� (612) 361-8�90 (B) Rue Shibata 6190 S. Robert Trail Inver Grove Hei�hts, MN >j077 (6� 1) 687-3036 (B) (6�1) 4��-932� (.E� Manny Camilon City of St. Louis Park �00� Minnetonka B(vd. St. Lauis Park, MN >j416 (612) 924-2�89 Brad Digre Northwest Associated Consultant �77� Wayzata Blvd, Suite »5 St. Louis Park, MN »416 (612) �9�-9636 (B) FA,� (612) 59�-9837 Air Transport Association (ATA) Federal Aviation Administration ��) FAA Mirulesota. Air National —�.� Guard � , U.S. Air Force Reserve Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) MASAC ADVISORS Paul McGraw, Director Air Transport Association 1301 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20004-1707 (202) 626-4000 a+ I♦ Tawer Mariager FAA-MSPj:Control Tower 63=11 34th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 5�4�0 (61?)713-4000 ` Inspector RonaId Glaub FAA — NWA CMO ` 2901 Metro Drive, Suite 500 Bloomington, MN 5�425-1��9 (612) 814-4323 Major Roy J. Shetka 109 Tactical Airlift Squad MSP International Airport St. Paul, MN 5� 111 (612)725-5679 Captain David J. Gerken Asst. Operations Officer 96 TAS/DOV Minneapolis-St.Pau 1 IA.P Minnea.polis, MN 5�4�0 (612) 72�-5561 Commissioner Alton Gasper 3i�1/Ind.Chemical Products Div 236-2:�-01, 3�f Center St. Paul, NiN �� 144-1OQ0 (6�1) ?33-61�3 (6; l ) 82.5-6b�2 (1-� 8 Tom Browne Air Transport Association 1301 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, DC 20004-1707 (2Q2) 626-4100 Cindy Greene Tower Support Manager _ FAA - MSP Control Tower - 6311 34th Ave. Sa Minneapolis, MN 5�4�0 (612) 713-4010 Major Wallace W. Farris 934 OG/CC 760 Niilitary Highway Minneapolis, MN 5�4�0 (612) 725->j57 Comrriissioner Steve Cramer Project far Pride & Living 2�1b Chicago Ave. So. ?Vlinneapolis, MM ��404 (612)874-8�11(B) _ ) St3ff ' ) � Roy Fuhrmaim M.ASAC Technical Advisor Aviation Noise Progr-ams Manager 6040 28th Ave. So. Minneapolis, MN 554�0 (612)72�-6326 FAX 725-6310 a.� Chad:Leqve ANOMS S ecialist 6040 28�'I'�venue So. Minneapolis, MN 554�0 (612) 725-b328 FAX 725-6310 Melissa Scovronski MASAC Secretary MAC Environment Dept. 6040 28th Ave. So. Minneapolis; �t 5�4�0 (612)726-8141 FAX 725-6310 Shane VanderVoort ANOMS Technician 6040 28�' Avenue So. � Minneapolis, MN 5�450 (612)725-6329 FAX 725-6310 a C C