The URL can be used to link to this page

07-08-1998 ARC PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS :' AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION ; ' AGENDA July 8, 1998 - 7 p.m. - Large Conference Room 1. Call to Order - 7 p.m. 2. Roil Cali 3. Approval of June 10, 1998 Minutes. 4. Unfinished and New Business: a. Review Airport Plan of Action b. Discuss MASAC Request for Corridor Issues To Be Studied c. Remote Monitoring Tower Analysis -(To be provided Wednesday p.m.) 5. Updates �d l ✓l/� � � A a. MASAC Update b. City Council Resolution on Corridor Compliance and Correspondence c. FAA Letter on Head to Head Operations and NSDP's 6. Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence: a. Airport Noise Reports for June 5, 1998 b. MASAC Agenda for June 23, 1998 and May 26, 1998 Minutes c. MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for May 1998 d. MASAC Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for May 1998 e. MASAC Operations Committee Agenda/ Minutes for June 12, 1998 (Please refer to MASAC Agenda Packet) f. Nighttime Noise Summaries 7. Other Comments or Concerns. 8. Adj._,ourn. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. � CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS MEM July 6, 1998 To: Airport Relations Comxnission ---,. From: Kevin Batchelder, City Adn�r Subject: Unfinished and New Business for May Meeting DISCUSSION This memo will cover the three items on the a;enda for Unfinished and New Business, specifically, the review of our Airport Plan of Action, the Discussion of MASAC's request for Corridor Issues to Be Studied, and RMT Analysis. Air�ort Plan oi Action - The Commission requested revisions to the Mendota Heights Air Noise Plan of Action and that it be placed on the July agenda for further review and discussion. The Air Noise Plan of Action is intended to serve as a guide and a goals statement to direct our actions, as it relates to airport operations and air noise in the community. The Commission stated their intent would be to pzesent an updated Air Noise Plan of Action to the City Council in 7uly or August. On Wednesday evenin�, the Commission should review the Topics of Interest list, the Focus Issues and the Action Plan as it has been revised to date and suggest changes, additions, conections, etc. Changes are shown u�+�•�for deleted language and in redline: for new additions. (Please see attached Action Plan.) ACTION REQLJIRED Consider the Air Noise Plan of Action and provide direction to staff, or a recommendation to City Council. 2. Discuss MASAC Rec�uest to Define Corridor Issues - We have received a formal request from MASAC to c�nsider and submit a list of Corridor Issues to MASAC by August 17, 1998 for their consideration. The MSP Noise Mitigation Program includes an airport operations directive to Evaluate DeDarture Procedures in the Eaoan-Mendota Heights Corridor. As a result, this topic was added to the MASAC Work Plan for 1998. MASAC is asking Mendota Heights, and the other conidor communities, for a list of suggested corridor topics. (Please see attached July l, 1998 letter from Mr. Robert Johnson.) The City of Ea�an prompted this request by submitting their own list of Corridor issues prior to Mr. Hohenstein's departure. (Please see attached.) • ' • 1' 1 The Commission should review Corridor Departure issues that they would like reviewed by MASAC and provide staff with direction, or consider a recommendation to City Council. 3. RMT Anal,vsis - At the Commission's request during the June meeting, on Wednesday evening, a color graphic presentation will be available for review by the Commission. • • � 1' / Acknowledge presentation. Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) 6040 28th Avenue South •�linneapolis. Minnesota 55450 •(612) 726-9411 Chairman: Robert P. Johnson Past Chairs: Scott Bunin, 1990-1995 Walter Rocicenstein. Ii, 1982-1990 Jan Oel Calzo, 1979-1982 Stanley W. Olson, 1969-1979 Technical Advisor. John Foggia July 1, 1998 IVlayor Charles Mertensotto City of Mendota Hei�ts 2371 Rogers Avenue Mendota Heights, MN �� 120 Dear Mayor Mertensotto: The IVletropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) is in its 29th year of addressing airport related noise issues and concerns. MASAC represents a consortium of airport, air carrier and community ��'" l representatives. As one might espect, such a composition provides an insightful platform for innovative __ methods of addressing various aircraft noise related issues. In support of MASAC's charter the MASAC Opemtions Committee (tivhich reports to the full MASAC body) convenes monthly �to address specific noise related issues. The 1998 «ork plan objectives for the MASAC Operations Committee includes elements from the MSP Noise tiiitigation Program, �vivch resulted from the legislation ending the Dual-Track Study. One of the eight airport operations directives contained in the program follows: Fvil.lilC.t.in ne,.nnrt:tre Prxedt�rec in r.hG' Fnonn_!1ilnnii_nl�? F�vjohtc �'nrri�pr As a result of the above directive the IVIASAC Operations Committee has incfuded this topic in its 1993 work plan. Due to your community's proximity to the comdor a;ea, su�estions are tivelcome related to this topic. It is important to keep in mind this is an evaluation of departure procedures not a corridor redefinition initiative. All comments received will be reviewed bv the �It1SAC Operations Committee in the determination of possible topics. Although submitting sug�estions does not necessarilv mean thev �vill be included in the evaluation, sug�estions can enhance the process. Please note the enclosed lerter received from the ciry of Ea�an �vhich provides some suggestions for vour review. If vour communit�� vishes to submi� a similar letter please do so before .�ugust 17, 1998. �AECYC�cD �?FE� ��' _; � �t Thank you for your time and consideration. If you have a.ny questions or comments please contact Roy t� Fuhrmann at 72�-6326. � S incerely, � ;, �� J ,-. ��,..�..�.-� � � ,.;--.� �-�. ,- /obert P. Johnsorr✓ MASAC Chairperson Enclosure cc: Kevin Batchelder Jill Smith � �� tilay 20, 1998 Bob Johnson, Chair Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council 6040 28`h Avenue South Minneapolis, Yi�iV 5�4�0 Dear Chair Johnson: THO(viAS E6�N MCVCr PAiRICIA AWADA BEA B�OM9UIST SANDRA A. fviASiN THEODORE WACHTER Counal MemCers THONIAS HEDGcS City Administrctor E. J. VAN OVERBEKE Ci1y Cierk In official action taken at its meetinQ of tilay 19, 1998, the Ea�an City Council formally adopted a list of issues to be cansidered in �-� ��SAC's rz•r;ew- uf the Ea��Iendo�a Hei�hts corridor. These include: • Comdor Compliance — the ne�d to maintain operations bettiveen run�vay centerline and 9� degrees. • Altitude Analysis — identify the means and estremes of operations' altitudes at one mile increments from the runway end to the Inver Grove Heights boundary on the east, Mendota Hei�hts boundary on the nonh and Ea�an boundary on the south and west. � Analysis of operations' consequences from run�vay redesi�ation to 10/30. • Modification of head-to-head procedures to eliminate the need for departures to diver�e. • Feasibility of standard instrument departure procedure to narrow operations. • Non-simultaneous departure procedure analysis. • Identification of desirable flia.ht tracks for ;eoaraphic positioning systems implementation. o Potential use of navigational aids for improved compliance with comdor procedures prior to GPS. � Recr,nsi�'�: alte�ati�•e dega.rrure profiles far co:rid�r cperatiors. I will be happy to provide additional information with respect to these items at your convenience or at the 1�I_�1SAC Operations Committee meetin� of June 12th. Thank you for your attention to this matter. S incerely, �� Jo Hohenstein Assistant to the City Administrator JH/ms MUNICIPAL CENTER 383C -^'IlC7 �CPiCB +�GAG =�.Ga�v.:�nir�riESQiA 5�122-189i ��ONE: (b 12) 681-�bCO rA.iC: (612) c21•db12 ?CD: (612) �!5�-�535 T�E LONE CAK TREc THE SYviBGI CF SiRE�lC-T'ri ANO G20V�/TH IM GUR CONINIUI�IIT! cquci Opperfurir� cmplcy�r MAINTENANCE FACILIiY 3601 COP.CtiNiAf�i POIMT _.a6AN. NIIM�IE�OTA 5�122 rHONE. (612) 681 •�3C0 F�.X: (812) 681-�3c0 iCD: (612) aP,-.^•853� AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION � Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Implementation of Non-Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure Action Steps: Who When 1. . . , 2. Monitor Compliance with Tower Order Staff/ Sfydy�RequeSted -T-: �:�_t- 3 NSDP's - Request Compliance Pursue Magnetic Shift Affect on 105 Degree Heading on 11 L 6; Re��ew� �2nd 6 month study ..._. ..� �,...,...,,�__r.......�.....�r.,__...�_.f.. ,:��,_r,��..._., ARC Staff Study _,,Requested � ARC � � AR� Oct x;9& , s;:i{ 1�6c= ��.x;..ti�:+�...L�__e .' . .. Staff/ARC �is- :( . IVI�SA-� . �=r�t�;��re�r�. ... �,�- _,_,.,:� � 1999 ARC Feb 99: ._..__ . _ ..__�.,__�.E � � � • ,► � � � Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of "Close-In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights. Action St�s: Who When -- -: -- � -- - ---- -- • • . - : - - -.:.- -- - - - ;:- - --: : --::-:--- ,,. = -� „. . --- - .. . - : --: - ;----- -:: - - - -.:.- �� :.,R:,:: �:..ti:.. �:.,.:,. � t:� i•:._� „ -- .. - :------;- ; , • � �__�� _ _ _ : :- --; ----- -; ..� c+x .ct , n n `+ � • ' (� �� • �� . 5. FAA begins NADPs �n MPCS. Staff/ARC March�`1998; � � �.--�-. -� __ �.-z,��.�1��._ 6' Rer�;iew' NADP�4Procedures MASAG Qps Augu,st ��I;g98 _ ..r _ ARC Sept,_ 1,998 7; ; Conti,nue �to pursue adoption ,of ARC/Sfaf�F Contin'ous � _..� , _. . .. :. . .. . _ .... :.,.� ,.,_� "close `in" �s' "disfant" deparCure procedures . . _. ...L:. .._ ....__ �.__�.._,. ..._u.:.�s 1._1». _. ._ . ... 2 a � . � • � � � � Issue: Naise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights Action Steps: Who When 1. Inquire with FAA Control Tower about Staff �as� current head-to-head operations Compie • _ - - �'��=�:�;_�s {IVlo�etl torHead to �H'ead t�ssue #4By � - fr F_.-es'uv _�ecevw.�. .._ri��...� .e..e_t..v.+ei.� ..v-e.�.-�v:.--�sk�m�. � �e.. 2 Demand/Aduocate MSP=Mantlatory�Rute CC/ARC Future MASAG� - L=cv� s.-vii�e'__..v'mvi1�L'•:a��_..� ' k..1.vLur__..cu�C-i�L:�L 4`�Lu c..xr"rvl -�. .-=� _'+.n .ca-ea' � -i-0 LtA t� �r41 _!.u✓rr for Stagellt:I�.Unly:between�� 0�30 p�m ! Meefiing � � y1 � and 6ta m`��o rept"ace,volunt�,a _ry�agreernents ; .- . - � �.4.=e+na..v_�k. t�_........-cm-_..:Aevu_h�l_v.�_s-r. ...c'-- . .. � ' . . - � . . . . � .. . . � � n.�. �+ . • • • .Jy .. ... . � . �'!'i�u.w ' • � r_a:�;_ ' �e� .�� .'.!: '..v n�- .. �. . :N • • • _ii{..ci_.c--LFk2i�L!�L_:��i:�i�4 . . . . ' 3 f \ n '� Issue: ��C� Action Stens � � � � . � � � Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Implementation of Narrowed Air Traffic Corridor which Minimizes Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure 1.. Advocate for Maintenance of 5 mile final arrivals and 3 mile corridor for departures 2. Pursue the benefit of updating Tawer orders to original intent before shift in magnetic headings � 3. Who When Staff/ARC Continuous Staff/ARC ��"��T IVIAS�4G T 999' ::__�__....,._��._ a_,�_�--�. Presentation to Commission on GPS by Staff �-",-��T MAC or other expert (Mr. Harold Pierce) �i'9�9:8: IVl:onitor�Carridor Carnplrance �and ^Depariure Staff/ARC Contcnuoe _.....��- .ia.l_w_r..... _ +-r H .. 4..._.L_.__ v_"_v_ _r. . .�»_._v. —3 _�.c_. .-M.[m.c-r.�c�_L�L.z �inL�v. 5 � Pursue�iRema�aCLof�',`Htn�ed Gorridor""`and� A;RC � the repeal 'of Tower=�Order on South Paralle[ ...__._ ,G.,,. �..,._,_t ..�.X__..,�, _.._._�.... . � ._�..:._«_.,. Runway �_�__.�.........L...��. _._: � C . - � � • � • � Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: IVlonttor Conformance V1/rth AThree Mile Headmg Procedure �1c't�on Ste s Who When ,..:.....,:_,......._---.:._:...�pL.._:.; :::: _.: �.._.�.,. 1� Reuisw: Corridor Gate,Penetrat�dn Anal�s�s StafflARC. ,Monthly _;._�•� ..._„[ „-_____ .,..v..__.:., ......__..�..,n __..v.�._.:.r .-.-.4.�.. �.�Y „�,_._.,:,.. ,..:a.wt:..: .._�._i_�....__.. • . �2i AIert�MASAC and�MAG��Abouf Comphance StafftARC As�necessary "r:a �.._r: .�,��,.i,. s.—.��G7..Ki�e. �.._,:u> i..iw9.�x..�...:,:,,.,_�._ ._..G.. i .._ ... ,.._..��_ ....,.... 3"� W,ork with FA�A to`Ach�euejCorndor� � StafflARC As`'n'ecessary � u.l�.:� ._:u.�, c1�H.,J.s t1rl�.aal-�-:-a+ex�e!4.___��Mslv.:r_..14c—+3--�—a�ec.aT k....�"��' c.��_.ix.ai L..:._. c_a..__. Jir_ti..� ._. !�._.._a�...__._A_... � ■ � � � � � � Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Commission Action Steps: � � � �/ Discuss concerns with State Senators and Reps. regarding composition of MAC. Pursue legislation to amend MAC Commissioner appointment process. Deuelop ;fon;g�fierm�`,strategic-�ap,pr�oach rto'S reFat�ons, w�th legisiature Wo'rkrw,ith tfihe Associafiion `ofii Metroprofitan_ Munrc�p;alities F�_.�.,. .,� ___� .�.� �=._F..� _.�.__r s m. r Discuss and Compare cities affected by air noise to MAC representatives Who When ARC/ n,.,., n-�i ��...no Council No�r.IDec::�9'8 ��__� ��_.:� �:��: �,__..,u: Review ARC/Staff ��n-� i� nno MAC representation with Northern Dakota County Airport Relations ;Complefied Commission. by,.IVI/aSAC 6 5 AIR NC}ISE r�LA�N OF AGl"I0N ; . , ��.. .. _.. _... , , , ,x � � , � _. _..� ..:. . .. ...... . . _ � Issue, He�ghten A'wareness of Mendota;'He�ghts Air. �Noise Concerns :., .�,., ... ..�....,� _r,.... �. �_.,�.. . � ;. ..,�,.. . , m��_:.: _ � .._..,.:. ,.,,:_:�: Goaf Advertrsmg the, MAC Air No�se Comptarnt Line ............:. ::. � .. _�._.�, ., . _. ...,. �---.� . _.,,: Act�ona Steps Who When 1 j Advertise �n Each Quacterly,YNewsietter, ;Staff Each' editron _.�...._ ........... . .. j . _,_.,z. t:,, .�._..._., .u, :.,....... , �. _� .�._�� .._,� �.�.�„� � _...a,, 2' , Cont�nue to Handout Nfagnetszon R�quest 5taff As requested, �..�.. ��.<z �... ...r..,..,� , _,.,�_.-� ��. .�.:.__, .;. �.v,,. ..r_: _ ,� ==-._._ .� m. _..�..� ._. :. Basis � s.� ��;u�.c;�:z �� and Telecasts �E,=._.,,.�.,�,. �t. _. ��..;., .. �C�ty.;�,Co,unci[ ,��-1r-2.'�v ? ��o�,(�.��-.�. �.:>r- � �5� 1�,--� k `�J CG �,,�- �\, y,�� -,,,,.� �� a �..�� S��-� �c�� issue: � � � ■ � • � • Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information aiad;;;l _ .__ :: about the work and effort of the City _.�.,. ,.._��,..�,___,._�� .�_..__: �_...----�_u_. _-----��.... ,..... Action Steps: Who When 1. Continue to inform the community on Staff/ARC Continuous . ARC projects and concerns using the City's newsletter and separate single page mailings. 2. Work with Northern Dakota County Airport Staff/ARC Cantinuous -- Relations Commission on possible Legislation _ for MAC representation. � 3. Mail letters and Heights Highlites to State Senators and Representatives regarding ARC issues 4. Invite guests to monthly ARC meetings (i.e., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State elected officials) 5. Expand coverage of air noise issues by pursuing informational meetings with editorial staffs of major papers 6. Continue to send press releases to newspapers, State Senators and Reps. 7 : Staff Continuous Staff Continuous (Quarterly) . Staff 7:;9:9:$; Council f - Staff Continuous Update and Promote air noise Staff/ARC Annually mitigation document. ' Host an�1 X �. I Open House for Community Staff/ARG nr� in er '' '`�'' � , ...... .. _..__. . .. ._.. � : ._.::_.�... - i' . , . .. _. _. �� .. . C._ � �')��`� v(�C�J�(<f � r �sc!�� 1,�—�r l� �) __ g � 'Issue: a.��a�w�...,.� Goat ....J' ._._=:i.�. � �+ � � . � � ,Conttnus to Collaborate with the Northern Dakota County Airports �'.::_....�:av.L.S.:�.�J ��.i.�_�. '�..�'-.a ��.auu�. . ��..u:'..�u�...�..��: �l.a___=._Li:.va�..a.��__a.�L.._...._._..._._�__�_.: �...__ � Action_Sfepys' G1 ' Define Accomplishments of NDCARG ..:.ti .:i.- . .i� ..,�:.. �_�4rs_.._ .� � �:.�. E�_. .. ._cuvvi. . —r.zr. _.a.�� 5... r.vz%� 2; P;rou�de Informafiion to Crty Council � s...a.n L.v:: .-.. �i_....uf _.n.-.ekv.t�.... Lut.�^.—�.aneir..K�.S�.....�atrranv.+__,}i—tiv.._ 3 �� Participate rnjAnnuat�Joint Meettng;= _,.:�_ �. 4 � �� - _ � �,�. of ARC's and.:,C.oun.cils _�_. _ � � � �� C Who Whe"n ARC Fa,ll;�,1998 ARC Fall� 1998 I.ia�v.:._i.-.� . �.__r.! t _ . �•_u ARC August�1 j998 ;ARC Cont�nuo'us 1,� �:I _,=i..,...:u.c,i t� wi , . ( Issue Heighten,;Awareness of�;'Mendota �Heights, Ai,r;Noise Concerns . ... :., :� �, ,,:.�, . �,, ,. ,r, , 5_ . _. .�.. , __ ,.. ... ., ; ..,.... _ ., r G'oal �' Who Wiien 1` Reuiew; Medra�rOutlets for News Articles Staff Contmuous i�.v. : _.. 4�L__irv.i.i.is..v�:�..:-1. v_.u�... . L � �+ L v_�vl+�i�.�1.i.u..��, �—+.1 u_u_.�ua .+�n �t�. _._u..� i .va.s � + .v e. �� and, ,Publish in Friday� News ., �� 2; Partic�pate in�Annual Jomt iVleeting' of AR'C ARC Annually �, , ....,. .::.�,__. � . .__..:. �..,....�. �_... �,,.�_.., .�,_ _�.u�..., . .:_�.,�.:_..: _. .,��.,_,.... 3 Inform Other Commurntres of our Issues Staff Contrnuous . ' i - rl.� ..:..a '�___v. .:v..�.:�i � _...__: i i....t_:t �.�.__U ..��x��'._u..r..�.��.. ni.�r.iv�...s L- r ..n..._. . �.. ,�..�.� r.t..._.a � �._ ... .. - and�'Actions � _ � � 10 � l Issue Heighten �Awareness of Mencfota Heights Air Noise �Concerns ...; ......�_ _,_.._ . . _ ... _ . ._...,_ _r�..;_:, ,. „ .�.. ,..� ,. _ .. .r�.�.:�. .. ..... ,s. ,,,,. ..,,,., ,Goal ; Work` with, Metro olitan Councrl'Re resentat�ues . � .�__r..j �. �t P._�.�......_ P ._<«.,..�_.,.,..,.��...,._:�_,.�.,,.: ,a, A►ction� Ste sF Wfio' When , ...,.�.__ _...._�� P_.:_... 1 Mail Letters��and tH�ights High'lifies Staff Quarteriy :and _,,.�., �--�.., �� ,.,t_._. ..,f� .,_��_.,_, ..._.�.,..�.�., ..�,�� . fio� Districtj 1�5 'Re resenfiati�e As needed __._„��,�-_._�, p.�,�y.�_,�.�:� � �.,a�_,.� ��:� 2 IVl:eet rr�ith d�stric't�15 Representatiue Nlayor/Staffi Annually .. to;tEducateArand M1Lobby, an `Mendotau�Herghts 3� Resol�et Land`�`l1se�Air No�se Zones�lssues CounciflStaff Current � 4r.:].:.'.'. �..."�1�...L�.ISJ�.u.3:Lu:uwu — _...v.r.�.u�.._C:.i�' � � L:::'� L,�c`�3.z...t��u,.u.�.+_..u�v.•.1_�....,u...r....��.va�:...r�.J:i'.1 4; Meet�w�th antlLEd-ucate Met Cauncr[ Sfiaff Staf`F As needed —�a. Lu��.<�..�5�'.�..+..L�.�.��. _.uxL•'�a.+.L'+va..� - _ 3_.:_.� .,.._-. ' .. . . . �... .� � .,, � � ... 1 1 b' � � � � � � � � Issue: MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan UI Goal: Monitor and Encourage prom� gation and adoption of Air Noise Mitigation Requirements in Mitigation Committee's Plan Action Steps: �� Participate in MASAC Action Plan to Implement MSP Mitigation Plan Review MSP Mitigation Plan Who When ARC/Staff Monthly ARC Annually ��--� 12 " � � � � � � � � Issue: Advocate a More Equitable Runway Use System Goal: Prevent Construction of Third North Parallel Runway Action Steps: 1. Monitor MAC Compliance with Contract 2. Research MAC Acquisition of Bureau of Mines property and MAC interest in off airport properties in 3rd runway area � 3. Monitor EIS Process for N/S Runway Who When Staff/ARC Continuous Staff �9-� :Current :ra_. «.«:;,,:.__..�...:, �'JtBff//4RC �-an-� i� nno .: `�. . " �-9.9-� '. • . , .. . _ . , . . , Com`piet, ed �:` -,� 4: Renego��at�� with MAG''on�Terms rn Councrl/Staff .: Cu�rent � � . , ,.,. �,_w �. .. -� 1=.��.��,.t4 ..,, ..� u,...��.��,.� .._,;.. :�,�.�� . ,. . .. . . . . .�� . : IUlinneapol�s`IIVIAC �contract� „�« a,�.—�.. .,r._t.��— ��.,..._r.,.�-. ---�:�i - . 5: ; Dtrect N{AC. an ,Preparatronwof :Exhibit of; Affe_c�t'ed�f'ropert es Upon`7 Complet�on�;;: ...L_.�.��u.. L�u.._.._i—Le�. >O:f�= MAC/Mp:145 C.oritra:ct ,::. .�� ::..:::::.:.:.::::_.:.�_,..:, 13 �' � �� y , AIR".�NtJ1-SE P�LAN��'OF :ACTI N ..��. .s: .:.,�._.Y: .... .. �r..-,�.r.._,:� ,, ., . . :..__ ,.. , rr .:_;... .. ... . . . (ssue Ad�ocate a More-Equi,ta6le;Ru,nway, Use.System . �,...,....:,: , ,:�... _.,.:_ r_ _ , ,.r,... ., ..a.._.. Goal ; Work to Eliminate Use of Head, to Head Operations � ,, ,..._._.._ ,,.� , _. _ ...,, _. _ ri._. __ ..� :,�,._.. ._ ._.._.,. , x..�..,. Act�on Steps Who When � �� 1;: Advacate, Use of Cro`sswind Runway A'RC Oct 1�99$ _ , � , _� _ .. �..�...�.,.� E,�.�:_,,�.� . . ...�..,a ..,, �_.. r�.,:�,.,. .< �. , , . •- �' :,�c�p,�a ��.�a ��Q� ��,�d; �t�era�ia�n�"'� � (i �� --�� < <--.=� .�� ;�� .9 � r'K.! .,- � � 4� f' � � 2 v i � �✓ ."_. �'� /US� f Y �1 c� Y,�'.�=�. ,�6 GC� f r C Issue' Advocafie a More Equitable' Runway Use System . v.....: i�.. '.?� .. ......4i ..._. �.1...� i i_�_.....:... t F,.-..: ..u-..ti __'} r-it-.:.. Lil� . vva.i-�:.. 7 .....r�t.r��_..�n�.l Goah IVionitor Progress of Nl5' Runway 17135 � ....:.....:.,. ,:. �...._:. . ,.a.,��. z_r � ,�.�:_. /action'Sfeps ' ,Who When 1't IVionitor EIS �Process for 1 �7135: ARC AugustF 1',998 ,..,r r__,r ��„a._:�.;.� _...,:_.T� ,_._,�„�. ._.�,t,,��, .�—,�—=__ _. _....__. _... ;2`. Ad�ocate for`�Tirnely��Consfruction of:� ARC Continuous �.n,-,r .._�: y ._..._...:. ,.r;o�.,�.. t__..�.._.. t,._r......�1 t i��eet_.._. :�..�_._._—i-:, :;:�,.:.�___:.:_ i ...�_<.i... �._,:o-...._u . N;ew�Runway' 17I35: ��.� � ..��_ ,a � _.�_ . . 15 � �,. , AIR'NO1SE'PLAN OF ACT�ION . ,,, , . _ , ,.:_.:_.�,. . � ,;..,. . .� r, . . � _. ., .. . , ,:,. , .. , Issu.e Aduocate a'IVlore 'Equitable Ru,nway,, U5e"5ystem; :,.r.,:; -- .:. . .......... ..�_,....�: ,. Goal � Monitor Runway Use Sy,stern (RUS�` for Confo,rmance with MAC ,_,::, :,,.... . �., ._..,.. _.. . . P,�i.icies �- Who When Action .Steps: 1 Reuiew Preferent�al ,Runway `U;se _Systetri A:RC/GC Fall 199'8 a..,�. � -,,,�.._.... _: _.��_�._,._�,_._.,.. 2 r Request MAC to AReconfrgure,= ARC/GC 1999; , _.�u�i "' v.�..�,..::. . .�.:_r _��.L _..'"'�.._ _„d.u.t._.'__.._��_..M.�u_...� .. -i.�.... . s. . _ _. Preferent�al Runway Use:System?to _E....�� t _,:,_ �nc:orpor.ate changes �n �Airp,ort ,witlit New 1�7/35"'Runway � ,�.w ,_.. r.�,_., ._:t_,.y...�{ 3, Morirtar�Gafie Penetrat�on�'Analys�s � ARC Monthly _._i-� _.1 c_fu �n.L_ �rf��F� ._1_v.t._i �..�.«.,.. ._. .a.� -{....�.'c . for;�Compliance with' Estabhshec! ��- � 1 6 b � � ► � e � ► • � • ; - , � - • � - � � 1[+Z+I�N7��ypl�til%l��l�i��1i1��1�Il�f%l�f�Pl�•l�f�[+1%I � � : " ' '_ ' ' ' ' ' ' � ' " _ _ ' ' � � � � � ' ' i • i i. � i• i• i ' " '_ " ' ' " _ ' " " ' ■ ' _ R�J��I��Il�4rl��R�J�t1• � _ � ' i ' ' i ' -- 1 I � 1 I • 1 I � � � � � ' A � • • • • � _ � �� _ � • • - • 0 0� m 0 B - 1 1 1 ♦ ♦ � � � � � � � 6 � _ _ _ . : _ : _ � � _ � v � Y � O .� � � � 1 � • • - � � • � � � � • � - _ � � � _ � � � � � � � � � � � � _ • � t ' (See Page 1 1- Strikeout items incorporated there) (. 17 b' � � � � � � � � Issue: ' ' ' Spec�fic Norse Contro.l :�:_.� .. ........... ...,..._ _ .. t _.,.,.. _, :,; iVleasures Goal: Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000 Action Steps: 1.. Work with MAC to assure 1996 legislation to convert to all Stage III aircraft by Year 2000 is implemented 2. �e�rsi�e� 1VI;on'itor Backsliding of �_n:_ �tz.:::::�>,,� Stage III Conversion � 3. MASAC Consideration of Stage III compliance � �� s � ( � c�-�..� � ��-t-s .�,,� � ��,�- �� { U e�,,�.� �� ,�� .(-� � C � �� Who Staff When Completed A R C �afl-fia�fise-e� �� . ARC/Council Periodic - �UpGc��K- (r„i� �(%C-�--�C �,. t.tic� . <9 `S �-'�-!' �—^'�a. � �!—� �'�' �"� ( ` �__ � 18 b Issue: Goal: � � ; � � � � � � ' ' ' Spec�fic Noise ,Control ,.. .:�„ �,....,.,�,... (Vl;eas'ures IVlonitor MASAC's�'Plan_ to�Reduc,e A�rcraft Runup_yNoise Tand_Aircraft :Ground_Noi'se_ Dur�nYa::.:Perwds_o,fi,Departur:e. Action Steps: 1.. Review MASAC Pian on Ground Noise Who When Staff/ARC Fa111998 2. Review Bluff Noise Issue ARC 1999 3. Make Recommendations To MASAC ARC/CC 1999 G re��- � . AIR IVOISE LAN OF ACTION Issue: IVl'easures �.�:� :�_ GoaL Promate the�lmpl�ernentat�Ton' of�Globaf""Positi;o}nmg� $atefi�te Teehnology '=1—. I ac-,� 1c..�._ ._icciv`vin.__.iCx:.k...av.. __ __..ol._.� aavtv.�a.._L{. .l.,Y to Controt ..s ure �eadings in Corric(or ,..�__�_� T-,� � R�.. - � � _ �,�: /� � U�1( a��.. , . /act�on Steps (' 1 ' Who When � . � �� ,�_�_ 1 � Sehedule GPSExperton_ARC_Agend;a ;Staff �[999 .i��. .. �,� � �a� �� i � 3: Runway Use System _Reu�sions --- ; ��. �t �-� � �,�� r �,,�--- � ; . f'"4:' ' { ; � :,-;� -= �L'_,,�'_�=�; ARG Fall ;1998 � �._.__,� .. ; : .. �rential ARC/Staff Continuous � ..,. ,_..........: � ; _ __i� t �,'�' �_' - r:-' i� . <: �wP � � `�� -�-- � �> � �.-�� ::�� .-�� C" ,,,-b� ��t� ��`'�� - � Yn y `��`�v_ l �� r �. � � � ' � � � • Issue: Noise Reduction Through Litigation ��a � ,� Goal: -Det�mir�e Feasibility of a Legal Challenge to Current Air Noise Distribution Action Steps: 1. Continue to be kept abreast of other communities' issues and possible litigation process 2. Consider Freedom of Information Request for EIS or FONSI's on Increased ` Operations 3. Consider Legal Challenge Options if North/South Runway is Delayed Who When Staff/ARC Continuous Staff/ARC 1997 Staff/ARC '' nn� i� nao �T 99$;/_1999; � �-- 20 � " � * � • � � � � Issue: Expand Eligibility for Part 150 Sound Insulation Program in Areas Affected by Air Noise Exposure Goal: Air Noise Mitigation Thraugh Sound Insulation Action Steps: Who When 1. Continue to monitor changes in the Ldn StafflARC On-going contours and monitor the Part 150 Sound Insulation program completion process. � 2. Examine the feasibility of purchase or. ARC/Council acquisition through Part 150 for severly impacted areas 3. Ensure ANOMS data used for Noise Contour Staff/ARC Generation for 2005 Part 150 DNL 60 MASAC r... . ... 3-g9$ Dec" 'f�99;8 ( __-- . .��-v,��.., 21 s� Issue;_ ... . �: LI..:. Goa1:Y' , .�� AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION Nletropolitan Counc�l Noise�Zone_ M'ap ancl,_Related,^Land'Use,_Controls :�._:_�lu��.u-Luf_.�=.��_.vi.:__�.u+�.��...v�..:uL...,�.._.._..+: ..J��x� �.�.: Revise Met Council Land,Use Zones,and; Controls to the_,Pre�io.us �and _�,��.�_� .�,��..uu,., ...._ �._. Use �o'nes _. __ � .----_ . fkr.�...._ � 1; UV`ork wath C�ty C'auncil: and� A'RC � � , 4 � n�...�:. :.:__. P,,lanning C.a`mrnrssion on�Cornprehensi�e ,._.._C1�v.,. T.v<.!n.L:._�u._. �_...+.L�.v. .0 —»a_.._._.___ v. Plan subrniss`ion. s_...eA:.�-.�li__e��..4uk- v., v_ov 2:.. 3�_ � Reu�ew��MAC �20Q5 LDN Cantours °for;; 5 „- Applic;ation_�t Land Use :�ones Cons�clerrRepeal of�Sound P►ttenuatron ; Qrd�nance � ._.: ,�.,_.:_: . _: .. A_RCiCC A:RC/CC _�-_ �� nc� r,.'-�- _� n—�r nr�o .�U�j! s-�1;99:$ Updated �tts�,-�-��- � _ �_� �� _. �•�,: .�,�=: ACTIONPL.98 WFi'en C.urre`nt ��y � /✓ / I ' �4rrgu�'C'1�9.9r$ S � ��t 199_8 � ._...� 22 � C C CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUI�TY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIOIVS COMMISSION JUNE 10, 1998 - MINUTES The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, June 10, 1998 in the City Hali Large Conference Room, 1 101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was cailed to order at 7:00 p.m. The following members were present: Beaty, Roszak, Des Roches, Leuman, Stein and May. Commissioner Fitzer was excused. Also present were City Administrator Kevin Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner May moved approval af the April 8, 1998 and May 13, 1998 minutes. Commissioner Roszak seconded the motion. AYES: 6 IVAYS: 0 Administrator Batchelder explained that at the May Airport Relations Commission meeting, the Commission made revisions to the Mendota Heights Air Noise Plan of Action and requested that it be placed on the June agenda for further review and discussion. The Commission reviewed and updated Air Noise Plan and Topics af Interest. Regarding the Topics of Interest the Commission suggested that the High Priority Issues read as follows: HIGH PRIORITY ISSUES Equity of Current Runway Use System (Head to Head Equitable Distribution). 2. MAC Representation 3. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles. A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SSION M/NUTES - JUNE 10, 1998 4. MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues - Expansion of Existing Airport. � 5. Corridor Definition/Compliance Issues. 6. Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related Land Use Controls. The Commission made no changes to the following Medium Priority Issues and Issues to be Monitored. MEDIUM PRIORITY ISSUES 7. Global Positioning Satellite Technology. 8. Nighttime Restrictions on Aircraft Operations. 9. Noise Measurement Issues - a. Usefulness of Ldn 65 Contour b. Expansion of MAC Aircraft Noise Operations Monitoring (ANOMS). 10. Implementation of MSP Mitigation Committee's Comprehensive Plan. ISSUES TO BE MONITORED 1 1. Prevention of Third Parallel Runway - Monitoring Contract with MAC. 12. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures. 13. Phase Out of Noisy Stage II Aircraft. 14. Aircraft Engine Run-Up Noise and Aircraft Ground Noise During Periods of Departure Over Minneapolis. The Commission discussed and made changes to the Action Plan's Focus Issues. 1. Noise Reduction through Modified Takeoff Procedures a. Monitor the Implementation of Non-Simultaneous Procedures. b. Pursue the Adoption of "Close In" vs. "Distant" Departure Procedures. c. Urge the Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations. C A/RPORT RELATIONS COMM/SS/ON MINUTES - JUNE 90, 1998 Z � d. Implementation of Narrowed Air Traffic Corridor. e. Monitor Conformance with Three Mile Heading Pracedure. 2. Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Public Participation and Representation a. Pursue Appointment of City Resident to the MAC. b. Advertising the MAC Air Noise Complaint Line. (The Commission noted that the quarterly newsletter reminds City residents of the air noise phone number). c. Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information as well as Informing the Community about the City's Progress related to Air Noise Issues. d. Continue to Collaborate with the Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition (NDCARC). e. Continue to Keep Abreast of other Communities' Issues and Actions. f. Work with Metropolitan Council representatives regarding Air Noise. 3. MSP Lonq Term Comprehensive Plan a. Monitor and encourage Promulgation and Adoption of Air Noise Mitigation Requirements in Mitigation Committee's Plan. 4. Advacate a More Equitable Runwa� Use System a. Monitor Contract with MAC on Third Parallel Runway. b. Eliminate Head-to-Head Operations by using Runway 4-22. c. Prevent Construction of a Third Parallel Runway. d. Monitor Progress of the North/South Runway. e. Monitor Runway Use System (RUS) for Conformance with MAC Policies. The Commission felt that Monitoring the EIS Process for the 12,000 foot runway should be made an action step. Administrator Batchelder reminded the Comrnission that MASAC will be reviewing the Runway Use System for Conformance with MAC policies this summer. � � A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES - JUNE 10, 1998 3 � C� Specific Noise Control Measurers a. Assure conversion of Stage III Quieter Aircraft by Federal Deadline of Year 2000. b. Monitor MASAC's Plan to reduce aircraft engine run-up noise and aircraft ground noise during periods of departure. c. Promote the Implementation of Global Positioning Satellite Technology to Control Departure Headings in Corridor. Expand Eligibility of Part 150 Sound Insulation Program in Areas Affected by Air Noise Exposure. 7. Metropolitan Council Noise Zone Map and Related Land Use Controls a. Revise Metropolitan Council Land Use Zones and Controls to the Previous Land Use Zones Using the MAC's Year 2005 LDN Contour Maps. The Commission reviewed the Air Noise Plan of Action. The following changes were made: Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Implementation of Non-Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure Action Steps 1. 2. 3. Monitor Compliance with Tower Order NSDP's Request Compliance Review First Six Month Study 4. Pursue Magnetic Shift Affect on 105 Degree Heading on 1 1 L 5. Review Second 6 Month Study A/RPORT RELATIONS COMM/SS10N M/NUTES - JUNE 10, 1998 � Who When Staff/ARC Study Requested Staff/ARC Study Requested ARC Oct. 1998 Staff/AFiC/ 1999 MASAC ARC Feb. 1999 4 �_� Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of "Close-In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to Reduce IVoise Generation Over Mendota Heights Action Ste�s Who When 1. FAA Begins NADPs in Mpls Staff/ARC March 1998 2. Follow Up with NADP Procedures ARC Sept. 1998 (MASAC Ops. to Review in August 1998) 3. Continue to Pursue Adoption of ARC/Staff Continuous "Close-In" vs. "Distant" Departure Procedures Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of IVlandatory tVighttime Takeoff Regulations to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights The Commission was of the consensus to include the Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations as part of Focus Issue No. 4- Advocate a More Equitable Runway Use System. Refer to Item 4b. under Focus Issues. Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Implementation of Narrowed Air Traffic Corridor which Minimizes Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure Action Steps Who When 1 Advocate for Maintenance of 5 mile final Staff/ARC Continuous arrivals and 3 mile corridor for departure 2. Pursue the benefit of updating Tower orders to Original Intent before Shift in Magnetic Headings 3. Presentation to Commission on GPS by MAC or other Expert (Mr. Harold Pierce) A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/5S/ON M/NUTES - JUNE 10, 1998 Staff/ARC MASAC 1999 Staff 1998 5 Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information � Action Steps Who When 1. Continue to inform the community on Staff/ARC Continuous ARC projects and concerns using the City's newsletter and separate single page mailings. 2. Work with Northern Dakota County Airport Staff/ARC Continuous Relations Commission on possible legislation for MAC representation. 3. Mail letters and Heights Highlites to Staff Continuous State Senators and Representatives regarding ARC issues 4. Invite guests to monthly ARC meetings Staff Continuous (i.e., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State (Quarterly) elected officials) 5. Expand coverage of air naise issues Staff/ 1998 �� by pursuing informational meetings with Council editorial staff of major papers 6. Continue to send press releases to news- Staff Continuous papers, State Senatars and Representatives 7. Update and Promote air noise mitigation Staff/ARC Annually document. 8. Conduct Open Houses for Public Staff/ARC 1999 A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON MlNUTES - JUNE 10, 1998 G \ Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Commission Action Steps Who When 1. Develop long term strategic approach to Staff/ARC Continuous relations with legislature Council 2. Work with AMM to Advocate an Elected Staff/ARC Continuous MAC 3. Review MAC representation with NDCARC ARC/Staff Continuous Issue: Goal: The Commission discussed the importance af lobbying and that the City needs to be more politically active. MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Prevent Construction of Third North Parallel Runway (� � � Action Ster�s 1. Monitor MAC Compliance with Contract 2. Research MAC Acquisition of Bureau of Mines property and MAC interest in of airport properties in 3rd runway area Who When Staff/ARC Continuous Staff Current 3. Monitor EIS Process far N/S Runway Staff/ARC July/Aug 199$ Regarding Item No. 2, Administrator Batchelder stated that he had attended a meeting regarding the Acquisition of the Bureau of Mines property and that he has sent a letter to the general counsel. (" ) A/RPORT RELATIONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES - JUNE 10, 1998 % Issue: MSP L.ong Term Comprehensive Plan Goal: Implement Noise Mitigation Requirements in MSP Mitigation Committee's Comprehensive Plan Action Steqs Who When 1. Implement MACs MSP Mitigation Plan Staff/ARC 1998/99 a. MASAC Action Plan for Implementation b. Joint Efforts with NDCARC (The Commission was of the consensus to include this item as a specific goal) c. Dakota County Assistance (The Commission discussed how the NDCARC has accomplished this item). d. Legislative Assistance Issue: Goal: Conversion to Stage I11 Quieter Aircraft Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000 Action Steps Wha 1. Work with MAC to assure 1996 Staff legislation to convert to all Stage III aircraft by Year 2000 is implemented 2. Monitor Backsliding of Stage III Conversion ARC 3. MASAC Consideration of Stage III ARC/ Compliance Council When Completed Periodic Issue: IVaise Reduction Through Litigation Goal: Determine Feasibility of a Legal Challenge to Current Air Noise Distribution Action Steps 1. Continue to be kept abreast of other communities' issues and possible litigation process Who When Staff/ARC Continuous AIRPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES - JUNE 90, 9998 $ � C. 2 3. Issue: Goal: Consider Freedom of Information Request Staff/ARC 1997 for EIS or FONSI's on Increased Operations Consider Legal Challenge Options if Staff/ARC 1998/99 North/South Runway is Delayed Action Steps Expand Eligi6ility for Part 150 Sound Insulation Program in Areas Affected by Air IVoise Exposure Air Noise Mitigation thraugh Sound Insulation 1. Cantinue to monitor changes in the Ldn contours and monitor the Part 150 Sound Insulation program completion process. Who When Staff/ARC On-going 2. Examine the feasibility of purchase or ARC/ acquisition through Part 150 for severally Council impacted areas 3. Ensure ANOMS data used for Noise Contour Staff/ARC/ Dec. 1998 Generation for 2005 Part 150 DNL 60 MASAC .�. Administrator Batchelder informed the Comrnission that he will be providing them with copies of the MASAC's monthly packet. Batchelder explained that he had received a complaint from an individual who lives in northern Mendota Heights about excessive air noise. Batchelder stated that he had sent a letter ta the FAA informing them of the repeated air traffic patterns north of the established southeast corridor boundaries. Batchelder stated that ANOM monitors will be placed at five new sites. He stated that two of these sites will be located on our side of the river. The Commission acknowledged receipt of information regarding the FAA Airspace Usage and Control Tower document. The Commission noted that Departure Control is responsible for directing aircraft that depart Minneapolis airport to a point 40 miles from the airport, which is Farmington. They noted � . � � A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES - JUNE 70, 9998 9 that departure control utilizes radar and SIDs to get the aircraft headed towards its destination. (, The Commission reviewed maps depicting Minneapolis App�oach Control. ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS REPORTS/CORRESPOIVDENCE The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Airport Noise Reports for May 8 and May 22, 1998. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Agenda for May 26, 1998 and April 28, 1998 minutes. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for April 1998. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for April 1998. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Operations Commifitee Agenda/Minutes for May 8, 1998. �, The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Eagan ARC Agenda for June 9, 1998. MISCELLAIVEOUS Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission that Councilmember Smith would not be able to attend the June 23 MASAC meeting. Chair Beaty stated that he would be unable to attend the meeting. Commissioner Leuman stated that he would check is schedule and inform Administrator Batchelder of his intentions on Thursday, June 1 1. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Airport Relations Commission moved to adjourn its meeting at 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary . (,,. A/RPORT RELAT/ONS COMM/SS/ON M/NUTES - JUNE 90, 1998 � O U.S. Department of Transportation Federni Aviation Administration May 28, 1998 Mr. Mark Saimen MASAC Ops Committee Chairman Metropolitan Airpo�ks Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 Dear Mr. Salmen: Airport Traffic Control Tower 6311 34th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 It is the understanding of the Minneapolis Airport Trafr►c Control Tower that the MASAC Ops Committee is attempting to do an evaluation of the Air Traffic Control utilization of the non-simultaneous departure procedures. As the Ops Committee and the City of Mendota Heights are aware, this procedure was implemented with the understanding that these headings would be utilized "whenever possible". This term was intentionally used because there are many variables that determine if this procedure is possible. �'- � The two most basic requirements, as explained by Support Manager Cindy Greene, are — the staffing of only one local controller, and only one aircraft at either of the parallel runways ready to depart at a time. Due to the infrequency in which these two require- ments are met between 6:00 AM and 10:30 PM, there are rare times throughout the day in which non-simultaneous departure procedures are possible. I understand that the focus of the MASAC Ops evaluation will now be during the quiet hours of 10:30 PM and 6:00 AM. During this time period, under normal circumstances, there is anly one local controller staffed. There is rarely an aircraft at each paralle! ready to depart at the same time. There are, however, still enough variabies present to make this evaluation by the MASAC Ops Committee dift�cult, and most iikeiy its vaiidi'ry questionable. The requirement for head-to-head operations (land 30UR depart 12UR) has an impact on the use of non-simultaneous departure procedures. Some of the variables associated with the impact of head #o head operations are: 1. How far out the arrival is on the opposite direction final. 2. The speed of the arrival. 3. The type aircraft that is arriving and departing. 4. The weather conditions. 5. The abiiity of an arriving aircraft to see a departing aircraft. 6. The ability of a departing aircraft to see an arriving aircraft. 7. The wiilingness of either pilot to assume responsibility for visual separation. 2. Air traffic controllers evaluate each of these variables and make the decision which he ' � the departure is assigned. The controllers are well aware of the non-simultaneous departuge procedures and also take these into account in their decision making. The air traffic controller provides the required separation between an arrival and a departure, or between two departures. The method to obtain that separation varies from one controller to another. A controlier may elect to utilize visual separation, vertical separation, lateral separation, or merely wait until the arrival has landed. There is no way to provide the air traffic rationale for aircraft separation in each instance. The only scenario that can "normaliy guarantee" non-simultaneous headings is: One local controller, one aircraft ready to depart, No arrivals head-to-head, and weather not impacting the operatiQn. Any questions may be directed through the MASAC Ops Committee to Cindy Greene, Minneapolis Air Traffic Control Tower Support Manager. Sincerely, ,-- /�—�. ��.�-%�'�. Z_= ": .... D� . P� Acting Air Traffic Manager � ) a � �-' ,. �_� � . =i !� != 7�i A biweekly update on litigation, rejulations, and technological developments Volume 10, Number 10 PFCs 6.3 PERCENT OF TOTAL PFCs APPROVED DEVOTED TO AIRPORT NOISE PROIECTS About 6.3 percent — or � 1.2 billion — of the total �19 billion in PassenQer Facility Charaes that the Federal Aviation Administra[ion has approved for collection by airports is beins designated for noise mitiQation purposes, according to data provided by the FAA. Last sprinQ, FAA data indicated that about 6.4 percenk— or �976_ i million — of the total � 1 �.1 billion in PFCs approved at that time for collection was beina devoted to noise mitiaation projects (9, ANR, 57)• In its recordkeepin� of PFC projects, the FAA subdivides noise projects into six different cateQories. Following is the total amount for each cateQory as well as the percenta;e that catesory represents of the total PFCs for noise being collected: • �381,434,399 (31 percent) to purchase land; •$421,198,005 (34 percent) for "multi-phase" projects, which include two or more different projects devoted to land acquisition, aviQation easements, home buyouts, sales assistance, and soundprootin�; •�390,364,179 for soundproofin� projects. This represents 32 percent of the total noise projects. (Contira�ed on p. 80) PFCs 61 AIRPORTS IMPOSING PFCs TO SUPPORT NOISE IYIITIGATION PROJECTS, DATA SHOW A total of 61 airpons —two more than last year at this time — are imposina Passenoer Facility Charges (PFCs) to support airport noise mitiQation projects. accordin� to data from the Federal Aviation Administration. Chicavo O'Hare International still leads the pack in collectina PFCs for noise mitiQacion purposes. The airporc plans to collect ��.6 million in PFCs, most of which will support the airport's residencial soundproofinQ pro;ram. Los Anseles International comes in second with S1�0 million approved for various noise miti�ation projects, followed by ylinneapolis-S�. Paul International (S ( I b.9 million), Las Veaas ylcCarran Interna[ional (�91. I million). Lambert St. Louis International (�84.8 million), and Gen. i�litcnell International in Niilwauke� (�70.9 million). Followinv is a list of additional airports that plan to impose more than �10 miilion in PFCs for noise mitiga�ion: Cleveland Hooi:ins International (�68.3 million), Seattle-Tacoma International (Sb7.� million). Cincinnati International (5�3.3 million). Indianapolis International (543.'_ million). Louis�'ilie Interna�ional (�4U million), San Jose International (�29.9 million). Chicavo ylidway (529.� million), $oston Lo�an International (526.9 million). On�ario International (�l? million), Detroit l�letro (�1 l.5 million), Huntsville Internationai (S10.S million). and Palm Beach International (510.? million).d � June �, 1998 In This Issz�e... Noise Policy ... This special issue of ANR pro- vides data obtained from the Federal Aviation Administra- tion on airports that are collectin� Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs) to support their noise miti�ation pro- jects. �. It shows that 61 airports are now imposin� PFCs for noise miti�ation projects with Chicago O'Hare International still leadin� the pack and planning to collect �234.6 million, most of which will fund its residential sound insulation proaram. N1ost of the PFCs beina collecting for noise projects will be used to purchase land and homes and for sound- proofina pro�rams. About 6.3 percent - or � 1.2 billion - of the total $19 billion in PFCs approved by the FA� is beinQ used for noise mitiaation. Table 1, sho�ving PFCs beina collected for various categories of noise projects, begins on p. 74. Table ?, sho�ving PFCs being collec[ed by specific airports for various projects, begins on p. 7%. Copyri�nt �. 1995 by Airpurt `oi;a Repert..�shhurn. �'a. °�I-�7 �4 � Airport Noise Report Table 1 AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT PROJECTS FUNDED BY PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES l (Projects Approved by F:� as of 6-�-98; listed by project type) I � � � ( � ( WORK HU8 I CiTY �STATE; WORK CODE ( AMOUNT � IMPOSE � USE ( TOTAL S �Huntsville �AL Land ( �6,796,960 3/6/92 � 6/28/94 ( �381,434,399 S(Huntsvi(le �AL ��and � �92�,000 � 3�6/92 ( 11�2J95 S �Huntsviile �AL Land � �3,105,000 ( 3/6/92 5/28/97 M �Tucson �AZ ��and � �2,016,000 � 11/19/97 ( 11/19l97 ( M �Tucson AZ �Land ( �396,888 � 11/19/97 11/19/97 ( N �Fort Smith AR �Land ( �90,756 5/8/94 ( 7/24/97 M Fort Lauderdale �FL �Land $3,500,000 � 4/30/98 S Pensacola �FL Land �1,000,000 11/23/92 � 11/23/92 S �Pensacola �FL �Land �365,000 11123/92 8/10(95 S Tallahassee F� Land � P4,567,500 3/3/98 3/3/98 { M(West Palm Beach �FL �and $1,000,000 1/26/94 S/29/96 M �West Palm Beach FL Land �2,302,300 1/26/94 � S/29/96 M �West Palm Beach FL �Land ( �374.616 1/`26/94 6/11/97 M �West Palm Beach �F� �Land � $1,387,548 1126/94 � 6/1119? � M �West Palm Beach FL (Land �5,000,000 � 1/'26/94 � 6/11/97 � N �Bioomin ton �1L �Land � �35,OQ0 � 1215/97 � 12/5/97 N(Moline �IL. �Land ( $335,915 � 9/29/94 � 9/29/94 N �Moline (IL Land � �403,4Q4 3/12/98 ( 3/1?J98 N � Peoria IL Land � �650,Q00 9/8(94 � 9/8/94 N �Sprin field �IL Land ( $10,500 3l27/92 � 4/28/93 N S rin field �IL Land �11,958 327/92 4/28/93 N �Sprin field IL �Land i �9.� �1�7�g2 4/28/93 � N �Sprin field �Il. �Land �7,000 3/27/92 � 4/28/93 N S rin �eld (l� �and ( �5�0 � 3/27/92 4/28/93 � N(Sprin fieid IL �Land � �88,i67 11l24/93 � 3/11/97 M(indianapolis (IN ��and �42,532,859 6/28/93 � 6l28/93 � M(Louisviile �KY �Land � $40,000,000 � 1/29/97 1/29/97 � L �Minneapolis �MN �Land � $28,146,000 ( 5/13/94 � 5/13/94 M �Kansas Ci (MO (l.and � �9,880,000 � 12121/95 ( 12/21/95 � L �St. Louis MO �Land � �32,861,850 9130/92 ( 9/30/92 j L �St. Louis �MO �Land � �52,000,000 1/31/96 � 1/8/98 � L( Las Ve as ( NV � Land ( �17,793,000 2l24/92 ( 3/15/95 � �Las Ve as �NV (Land � �35,000,000 2/24/92 �?J24/92 L � �as Ve as � NV � �and � �5,250,000 ?J24/92 � 6C7/93 L �Las Ve as �NV �Land ( �26,250,000 ( 2124/92 � 6/7/93 � L ��as Ve as NV �Land � �6,300,Ofl0 2/24l92 � 6/7193 � N(Akron �OH �Land � �19,300 10/21/96 � 10/21/96 N �Akron (OH �Land ( �14,700 10I21/96 � 10/21/96 � N �Akron �OH �Land � �5,300 ( 10/21/96 ( 10/21/96 N �Akron OH �Land � �21,000 10/21/96 ( 10l21/96 ( M �Cleveland �OH �Land ( �7,137,600 � 9/1/92 2(2l94 M �Cleveland �OH ��and ( �29,685,OQ0 � 4/25/97 � 4/25/97 M IColumbus �OH �Land � �119,600 � 7/14/92 � 3/27/96 ( M �Columbus �OH �Land � �379,070 � 7/14/92 � 3/27/96 M �Columbus �OH �Land � �519,723 � 7/id/92 � 3/27/96 S �Da on �OH �Land � �336,333 � 7/25/94 � 7/25194 � N �Chattanoo a (TN ��and i $2,000.000 ( 4/25/97 ( 4125197 ( N(Chattanoo a (TN �Land � �100,000 ( 4/25/97 � 4/25/97 ( L�Salt Lake Cit -- �UT �Land � $479,200 � 1011/94 � 10/1J94 � N jL� nchbur �VA ��ano � �113,Q00 � 4/14/95 � 4/14/95 � N IBellin ham WA �Land j �16o.00o � 4/29/93 � 4/29/93 � N IBellinaham �V�lA �Land ( 5732.000 ( 10/5/94 � 10/5I94 � �irport tioisa Report June 5, 1995 I HUB � CITY N �Beilingham N �Appleton M IMilwaukee M � Milwaukee S �Pensacola M �Chicago M �Chicago L �Chicago L (Chicago M �Indianapolis L � Detroit M �Columbus N � Fort Smith M �Oakland M �Sacramento M �San Jose M � Fort Lauderdale M �Chicago L �Chicago L �Covington L � Minneapolis M �Columbus L � Dalias L ( Dallas M Miiwaukee L (Los Angeles M (Ontario ' S �Sarasota S �Sarasota � ._.I.C---....--�-- hica o L �Covin ton L �Covin ton S �Lexin ton S � Lexin ton S �Baton Rouge L � Detroit L �Minneapolis L �Las Ve as S (Manchester S �Islip N �Toledo N � Erie S � Knoxvilie L �Seattie L �Seattie M � Milwaukee M ; Sacramento N � Pueblo M � Fort M ers N �Key West L iOriando S ;Tallahassee f ! jSTATE: WORK CODE � �WA �Land � �WI ��and � � W I � Land � �WI (Land � � FL � Misc � �� jMisc ' �IL �Misc � �iL IMisc � �!L �Misc � W ( Misc ' IMI �Misc _ CA CA CA FL IL IL MN OH FL FL IL KY K`( KY KY LA MI MN NV �Multi-phas2 NH � Multi-phasa NY � Muiti-phase OH �Multi-phase PA �Multi-phase TN I Muiti-phase WA (Multi-phasa �WA IMuiti-phase ; W I i titulti-phGse I CA � Plannina i CO I Piannino i FL i Plannina iFL IPianninq ' F� � Piannine � FL � Piannirc � � AMOUNT I IMPOSE � USE ; �d54,350 � 12l11196 ' 12111/96 ( 514.5021 4/25/94 ; 4/25/94 i �5,676.000 j 2/24/95 i 2124195 � �3,074,000 � 2/24/95 ! 2(24/95 � �200,000 ( 11/23/92 � 8/10/95 � �11,493 � 6/28/93 i 6/28/93 � �297,707 � 6/28(93 j 6/28/93 ( �41,448 � 6l28/93 i 6i28/93 � �6,206,967 � 6/28/96 i 6/28/96 ( 5600,000 ( 12120/96 ( 12J20/96 � � 192.000 � 9/21 /92 � 9/21 /92 � �61,752 ( 7/19/93 � 3/27/96 � �20,555 ( 5!8/94 � 7/24/97 �345,000 ( 6l26l92 � 6/26/92 � �761,000 ( 4/26/96 � 4/26/96 ( �140,000 � 6/11/92 � 6/11/92 � �658,000 � 11/1/94 � 4/30198 ( 5124,969 6/28/93 � 6/28/93 ( $3,0OO,OQO � 6/28193 � 9/16/94 ( �409,000 � 3/30l94 � 3/30/94 � �248,800 � 5/13/94 � 5/13/94 ( $16,509 � 7/14/92 � 10/27/93 � �617.853 � 11r//96 � 11(7/96 �a384,027 11/7/96 � 11(1/°6 � $256,000 � 2/24/95 � 2J'L4/95 ( �150,000,000 � 11/28/97 � 11/28/97 �12,000.000 ( 4/28/98 ( 4/28/98 � $1,474,904 6/29192 � 1/31195 � �5 400,Q00 � 6/29/92 ( 1?J15/95 � 51,000,000 � 6/28193 ( 6/28/93 � �36,401,000 � 3/30/94 i 3l30/94 � $15,871,680 � 11/29/95 � 11/29/95 � 5159,783 � 8/31/93 � 4/21/95 ( 5184,322 � 8/31/93 I 9/27/96 � S8,532,260 � 9/28/92 I 4/23/93 � 511,350,0001 9/21/92 i o/21/02 � $78,103,300 � 5/13/94 � 5/13/94 � �0 ; 2/24/92 ' 2J24J92 � S1,400,000 ; 10/13/92 ! 3!4/96 � S1,150,000 j 9l23/94 ': 9/23/94 � S1,500,000 ; 1/16/98 � 1/16/98 � 5118,5181 7/21/92 ' 7121/92 � So42,750 • 10/6i93 • 10/6(93 � S10,430,488 ' 8/13/92 8I13/92 i 534,400.000 12/29/95 12(29/95 i 551,079,000 12/21/95 12�21/95 ! 530,000 4/26/96 G/2o/96 i S21,500 4/11/96 4/11/96 ; S 132.000 8/31 /92 8/31192 ! 575,000 ' 9/9/97 °r9197 S21.919. 8r'28/95 8l28/95 ; 5135,OG0 3/3/90 3/3/98 =,irport tiois� Report WORK TOTAL �7, 611, 367 $0,981,713 �421,1 So,�81,465 �� 76 � HUB ! CITY M ! West Palm Beach M (Chicago � IChica o M Iindianapolis L �Covinqton � �Covin ton N � Duluth L �Las Veqas S �Aihany N �Akron N �Akron M �Cleveland M (Columbus M �Oklahoma City N �Laredo S (Lubbock S IRichmond L iPhoenix S �Fresno N �Monterey M � Oakiand L �San Diego M �San Jose M �Chicago M �Chicaqo M �Chicago _M �Chicago L �Chica o L �Chicago L (Chicaoo L �Chica o N j Peoria L � Boston L �Minneapolis L � Minneapolis M (Reno M �Cleveland M (Cleveland M �Columbus M �Columbus Ni IColumbus M IColumbus M jColumbus l iSeattle L iSeattie M IMilwaukee M iMilwaukee I I � STATE! WORK COOE � FL ( Pianning IIL �Planning � i� ( Planning (IN �Planning � KY � Planning ( KY � Pianning ( MN ( Pianning �NV �Planning NY Piannin�_ (OH Planning (OH �Planning � OH � Pianning OH �Plannin __ OK (Planninct VA CA CA CA CA Airport [Voise I AMOUNT � IMPOSE I USE � $168,628 � 1/26/94 � 6/11/97 ( �1,,425.00� 7/5/95 7/5/95 ( �2,500,000 612$/96 � 6/28/96 I $75,000 12/20/96 � 12/20/96 ( �336,000 � 3/30/94 � 3/30/94 � �30Q,000 � 3/31/98 � 3/31/98 � �18,000 ( 7/1/94 7/1/94 ( �600,000 ( 2/24/92 � 2124/92 �45,d00 9/27/96 � 9/27/96 � �5,Q00 10(21/96 � 10I21/96 � $31,100 10/21/96 10/21/96 ( $508,570 4/25/97 � 4/25/97 ( �13,520 � 5/29/98 5/29/98 � �75,000 ( 5/2/97 � 5/2/97 � �15,786 � 7/23/93 � 12J31/96 � �33.511 7/9/93 � 2/15/94 � $15,931 � 7/3l97 � 7/3/97 � �4,000,000 1/26/96 � 1/26i96 � �444.400 9/18/96 9/18/96 $824,321 10/8/93 � 10/31/94 I s2ao,oao aisn�s� � ai�ois� � �1,461,000 7/26/95 7/26/95 � �29,778,000 � 6/11/92 6/11/92 ( $1,140,000 � 7/5/95 7/5/95 � �6,032,088 6/28/93 � 6/28/93 � �S,OOO,OQO ( 11/15/96 � 11/15/96 � �12,500,000 � 11/15/96 � 11/15/96 � �46,067,786 � 6/28/93 � 6/28/93 � $80,000,000 6/28/96 ( 6/28/96 �0"7,812.001 � 6l28/96 ( 6/28/96 � S28,OOO.Q00 � 3/16r98 � 3/16/98 '' ! $500,OQ0 ( 9/8/94 � 9/8/94 'i � 526,990.Oa0 � 8/24l93 � 1/27/97 � ( �10,OOO,d00 ( 5l13/34 � 5/13/94 � � �446,200 5/13/94 � 5/13/94 � ( �157,500 ( 10/29/93 � 10/29/93 � ( �22,362,400 ( 9/1/92 � 9/1/92 � � �8,675,000 ( 4/25/97 � 4/25/97 � � �20.323 � 7/14192 � 10/27/93 � � 571,974 ( 7(14l92 ( 10/27J93 � i �00.547 � 7/14/92 � 10/27/93 � � �269.810 ( 7/19/93 � 3127/96 ( i �993,829 5/29/98 ( 5/29/98 � I 522,377,000 � 10/25/93 ( 10/25/93 � I �304,000 � 10l25/93 I 10/25/93 � I �8,320.000 � 12/21/95 ! 12/21/95 � I �2.516,000 � 12/21/95 � � � S1.214.171.128 � ( I .�irpan Noise Rtpon WORK TOTAL. �1,214,171,128 rt .� June �, 199� Table 2 AIRPORT NOISE ABATEI�IENT PROJECTS FUNDED BY PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES (Projects Approved by FA,4 as of 6-�-48; (isted by airpon) i I I I i HUB j CITY ( STATE, WORK CODE I AMOUNT ( IMPOSE i USE ' S �Huntsviile (AL ��and � �0,796,960 � 3(6/92 I 6/28/94 ' S �Huntsviile �A� �Land I �920,000 � 3/6/92 ( 11/22/95 ' S �Huntsville �AL (Land I �3,105,OQ0 � 3/6/92 i 5I28/97 L �Phoenix AZ Soundproofing � �4,0OO,OdO � 1/26/96 � 1/26/96 M �Tucson �AZ �and i "2,016,000 ( 11/19/97 � 11/19/97 M �Tucson AZ Land � �396,888 ( 11/19/97 ; 11/19/97 N �Fort Smith AR Land � �90,756 � 5/8(94 � 7/24/97 N �Fort Smith �AR Monitorin � �20,555 5/8/94 ( 7/24/97 ' S( Fresno CA Soundproofin � �444,400 � 9/18/96 ( 9/18/96 L�Los An eles �CA Mufti-phase � �150,000,000 � 11/28/97 � 11/28/97 , N(Monterey CA Soundproofing � S824,321 � 10/8/93 � 10/31l94 '' M �Oakland (CA �Monitoring � 5345,400 ( 6/26I92 ( 6/26/92 I M �Oakland �CA �Soundproo�ng � �240,000 � 4l30/97 � 4/30/97 � M �Ontario (CA �MuIG-phase � �12,000,000 � 4/28/98 � 4128/98 � M �Sacramento �CA �Monitorin � �761,000 � 4/26/96 � 4/26/96 � M �Sacramento �CA (Ptannin � �30,000 � 4/26/96 � 4/26/96 L(San Diego CA �Soundproofin � a1,461,000 � 7/26l95 7/26J95 � M �San Jose (CA Monitoring � �140,000 � 6/11/92 ( 6/11/92 � M(San Jose CA �Soundproonn ( �29,T18,000 � 6/11/92 ( 6/11/92 N �Puabio CO Plannin � �21,500 � 4111/96 � 4/11/96 M � Fort Lauderdale FL Land � �3,5Q0,000 4/30/98 � M � Fort Lauderdale FL Monitorin � S658,OQ0 { 11/1/94 � 4/30/98 M �Fort M ers (FL �Plannin � �132,000 � 8/31/92 � 8/31/92 N �Key West FL �Pfanning � �75,000 � 9/9/97 ( 9/9/97 ( L �Orlando �FL �Planning � �21,919 � 8/28/95 � S/28/95 ( S �Pensacola �FL jLand � �1,000,000 � 11/23/92 � 11i23/92 � S �Pensacola �Fl. �Land I 5365,000 � 11/23/92 ( 8/10/95 � S �Pensacola �FL (Misc ( 5200,000 ( 11l23/92 � 8l1C;95 � S �Sarasota F� �Mutti-phase � 51,474,904 � 6l29/92 � 1/31I95 � S �Sarasota �FL Mu(ti-phase ( S5,400,000 ( 6l29/92 � 12J15/95 � S(Taliahassee (FL �Land ; S4,5o7,500 ! 3/3/98 � 3/3/98 � S �Tallahassee (FL �Planning � S135,000 � 3/3(98 � 3/3/98 � M �West Palm Beach �FL �Land I S1,000,000 ; 1/26/94 � 8/29l96 � M �West Palm Beach �FL Land I S2,302,300 � 1/26/94 j 8/29196 � M ��lest Palm Beach �FL (Land ! S374,616 ( 1/26(94 � 6/17/97 � M jWest Palm Beach (FL Land S1,387,548 i 1/26(94 I 6/11/97 � M �West Palm Beach (FL Land S5,000,000 i 1/26I94 i 6/11/97 � M IWest Palm Beach �FL (Planning S168,628 I 1/26/94 ! 6l11/97 � N IBloomington �IL �Land 535,000 ! 7215l97 ; 1215l97 � L iChicago � {IL �Misc 541,448. 6/28/93 ': 6/28/93 � L �Chicago �I� �Misc So,206,967 ' 6/28(96 : 6/28/96 ( L IChicago ;IL (Monitorina ' 53,000,000 ! 6(28/93 � 9/16�94 ( L �Chicago IIL �Multi-phasz S1,000,000 � 6/28/93 � 0/28/93 I L;Chicaqo IIL (Planning 52,�00,000 ; 6/28/96 � 6/28/96 i L�Chicago �1L �Soundprooiing S4o,067,786' 6(28(93 ' 6/28/93 � � iChicaqo �i� jSoundprooiing S80,000,000 6l28/96 ; 6i28/96 i � Chicaoo ii� �Soundprcofing So7,812,001 6/28/96 : 6/28/96 � � Chica o �IL (Soundorcoiino S28.00O,OQO 3(76/98 3/16l98 � M Chicaqo iiL IMisc S11,493. 6/28/93 6/28/93 ; Nt �Chicago �IL �Misc S297,707 6/28/93 6128l93 � M �Chicago IIL Iti�onitorino 5124,969 6�'28l93 � 6/28/93 ; PA iChicaqo 'IL IPlannina S1,425,000. 7/5/95 ; 7/5/95 ! .�irpott �ois:: Report LOCATION TOTAL $10,821,960 �4,OOQ,000 �2,412,888 �111.311 $444, 400 �150,000,000 �824,321 �585,000 $12,000,000 �791,000 �1,461,000 �29,918,000 �21,500 $4,158,000 $132,000 $75,000 �21,919 $1,565,000 $0,874,904 �4,702,500 $10,233,092 �35,000 628,202 529,5� 1,25 i �� Airport Noise Report HUB ' CITY M �Chicago M IChicago M IChicago M IChicago N i Moline N � Moline N � Peoria N IPeoria N �Springfield N �Sprinafield N �Springfieid N �S�ringfield N (Springfield N �Sprin field M (Indianapolis M �Indianapolis M �Indianapolis L �Covin ton L �Covin ton L (Covin ton L �Covin ton L Covin ton S ��exin ton S �Lexi� ton M (Louisvilie S (Baton Rou e L � Boston L �Detroit L � Detroit N �Duluth L � Minneapolis � �Minneapolis � �Minneapolis L �Minneapolis L �Minneapolis M IKansas Cit � �St. Louis L (St. �ouis L i�as Vegas L �Las Vegas L ;Las Ve as L iLas Ve as � ! �as Ve as L ;Las Vegas M ;Reno S �Ntanchester S Albany S Islip N �Akron N Akron N Akron N Akron STATEI WORK CODE IL (Soundproofing IL �Soundproofing �� (Soundproofing IL �Soundproofing IL �Land �� Land IL ��and �►� �Soundproofing �� and �IL �Land � i � ( �and------ �� Land �� Land �� Land � W (Land �►N (Misc ��N �Pianninq �KY (Monitorin�_ � �{�( Multi-phase �Ky (Multi-phase__ KY Piannin __ K`( � Pianning ({(y �Mu(ti-phase �t(Y �Muiti-phase �KY �Land _,_ �p �Multi-phase__ MA �Soundproofing �MI �Misc ---- �M� Multi-phase � MN � Planning �MN �Land ___ MN ( Monitorina (MN �Muiti-phase �MN �Soundproofina �MN �Soundproofing �MO (Land �MO ��and (N1p �Land (NV �Land �NV �Land INV �Land �NV �Land 1 NV � Land i Nv � Planning �NV �Soundproounc � NH I Multi-phasa (NY �Planning ;NY �Multi-phase � OH � Land !OH iLand ':OH ';Land :OH ILand AMOUNT � IMPOSE ( USE � �1,140,000 � 7/5/95 � 7/5195 { �&,032.088 � 6/28/93 ( 6/28/93 ( �S,b00,000 � 11/15/96 ( 11/15i96 � 512,500,000 � 11/15/96 � 11/15/96 � �335,915 � 9/29/94 � 9/29l94 � $403,404 � 3/12/98 ( 3/12198 ( $65� 000 I 9/8/94 ( 9/8/94 � �500,Q00 � 9/8/94 � 9!8/94 � $10,500 � 3/27/92 � 4J28/93 � 511.958 � 3/27/92 � 4/28/93= �9,000 ( 3/27/92 4/28/93 � �7,000 3/27/92 � 4/28l93 � $500 � 3/27192 ( 4/28/93 � $88,167 ( 11/24/93 � 3/11/97 { Q42,532,859 6l28/93 ( 6/28/93 � $600,400 � 17J20/96 � 1?J20/96 � �75.000 ( 12/2a/96 12/20/96 ( $409,000 � 3/3�/94 � 3/30/94 � �36 401 000 3/30I94 � 3/30l94 � �15 871 680 � 11/29/95 � 11/29/95 C �336,000 � 3/30/94 3/30/94 ( $300,�-3/31/98 ( 3/31/98 � �159,783 � S/31/93 4l21/95 � $184,322 8l31/93 � 9l27196 �40,000.000 1/29/97 1/29/97' � �8,532,260 9/28/92 4/23l93� �26 990,000 8J24/93 ( 1/27/97 � �192,0�-9/21/92 9/21l92 ( �11,350,000 9/21/92 � 9/21/92 � �18,000 � 7/1l94 � 7/1/94 � $28,146,000 � 5/13/94 ( 5/13/94 I �248,800 � 5/13/94 ( 5/13l94 ' �78,103,300 � 5/13/94 � 5/13/94 �10,D�0,000 � 5/13l94 � 5/13/94 $446,200 � 5/13l94 � 5l13/9d �9,880,000 � 12/21/95 � 12/21/95 �32 861 850 � 9/30/92 ( 9/30/92 �52 000 000 � 1l31/96 � 1/8/98 517,793,000 � 2124/92 � 3/15195 $35,000,000 � 2/24/92 � 2l24/92 �5,250,000 � 2124/92 � 6/7/93 $26,250,000 � 2/24/92 j 6/7/93 So,300,000 � 2/24/92 � 6/7l93 'i 5600,000 � 2/24/92 � 2/24/92 ; 5157,500 � 10/29/93 � 1Q/29/93 j �1,400,040 � 10/13/92 � 3/4l96 i $45,000 � 9/27196 � 9/27/96 i � 1,150,000 � 9/23/94 � 9/23l94 i S1°,300 � 10/21/96 � 10l21/96 514,700 � 10/21/96 ( 10l21/96 i S5,300 � 10/21/96 � 10(21l96 , �21,000 i 10/21l96 � 10/21/90" Rirpon �oise R�pon LOCATION TOTAL $739,319 I ,150,000 �127,125 $43,2a7,859 $53,317,680 �344,105 $40,000,000 �'._ ( $8,532,260 � $28,990.000 �11,542,000 �15,000 �116,944,300 �9,880,000 $84,861,850 �91,193,000 �157,500 �1,400,000 �45,000 �1,150,000 �96,400 ; June S, 1998 HUB � ClTY N IAkron N �Akron M �Cleveland M �Cieveland M (Cleveland M �Cieveland M �Cieveland M �Columbus M �Columbus M LColumbus M �Columbus M �Columbus M �Cotumbus M � Columbus M Columbus M �Columbus M �Columbus M �Columbus S �Da on N �Toledo M �Oklahoma Cit N �Erie N Ghattanoo a N �Chattanoo a S � Knoxville L � Dailas L Dallas N �Laredo S (L.ubbock L �Salt Lake Cih N �L nchbur S � Richmond N �Bellin ham N �Bellin ham N �Bellin ham L �Seattle L �Seattle L �Seattie � �Seattle N �Appleton M � Milwaukee M ;Miiwaukee M IMilwaukee M !Milwaukee M I Miiwaukee M �Milwaukee � � STATEi WORK CODE I OH �Planning � OH �P�anrnng OH �Land OH Il.and OH �Planning __ OH Soundproofing OH �Soundproo�nq pF-1 �Land __ _ IOH Land OH Land OH Misc �OH �Monitorinq �OH �Pianninq _ �py Soundproof� �OH �Soundproofing �OH �S��ndoroofing �OH �S�undoroofing �OH (Soundproofing (OH (Land ___ OH Muiti-phase ____ OK Piannin PA �Muf6-phase �TN �Land �TN �Land -� P�ann � P�an UT ��and VA ��ancl VA (P�ann Wq �Land � W�� (WA ��an �WA �Muft �wa IM�n�� Nq �Soun WA �Soun (WI �and �Wi I�a�d (N/� -�Lan (W� _ �M°ni ��/�/� �Multi WI �9 ; I � LOCATION AMOUM' I IMPOSE ! USE I TOTAL 55,000 � 10/21l96 � 10/21/96 � �3i,1Q01 10/21l96 i 10/21J96 j 57,137,600 � 9/1/92 I 212l94 �68,368,570 �29.685.000 � 4/25/97 � 4l25/97 � �508,5701 4/25/97 � 4/2J97 � �22.362.400 � 9!1l92 � 9/1/92 � �8,675.000 � 4/25/97 � 4/25/97 � 5119,600 7/14/92 � 3/27/96 � �2,526,657 �379,070 � 7/14l92 � 3l27196 � �519,723 � 7/14l92 � 3/27/96 �61,752 � 7/19/93 � 3/27i96 � 516,509 I 7/14/92 � 10l27l93 � �13,520 � 5/29/98 � 5/29/98 � �20,323 � 7/14/92 � 10/27/93 S71,g74 ( 7/14/92 ( 10/27/93 ( S&0,547 � 7/14/92 ( 10/2�193 � 5269.$10 � 7/79/93 � 3/27/96 � 5993,829 5/29198 � 5/2Ql98 � �336,333 7/25/94 ( 7/25/94 � �336,333 $1,500,000 1/16/98 I 1�16/s8 ( �1,500,000 575,000 ( 5/2197 � 5/2/97 � $75,000 5118,518 ( 7/21/92 � 7/21/92 � $118,518 52,000,000 ( 4/25/97 � 4/25/97 $2,100,000 g1pp,Qpp 4/25/97 � 4/25/97 �642,750 ( 10/6/93 � 10/6l93 � $642.750 5617,853 � 11/7/96 � 11R/96 $1,001,880 ' 5384,027 � 11l7/96 ( 11R/96 S15 786 � 7/23/Q3 � 12/31l96 � �15,786 S33 511 ( 7/9/93 � 2/75l94 ( �33,511 �479.200 � 10/1/94 � 10/1/94 ( �479.200 5113,000 ( 4/14/95 I 4/14/95 � �113,000 S15 931 � 7/3/97 � 7/3/97 � �15.931 5160,000 � 4�29�93 I 4/23/93 � �1,352,350 S732,000 � 10/5/94 ( 10/5f94 � 5454,350 � 12/11/96 � 1?J11/96 � S10,430,488 � 8(13/92 � 8/13/92 � �67,511,48$ 534,400,000 � 12/29/95 � 12l29/95 � S22,377.000 ( 10(25/93 � 10/25/93 � 5304,OG0 � 10/25/93 � 10/25l93 � 514,5021 4/25(94 � 4/25l94 � �14,502 Sb,676,CA0 � 2/24/95 i 2/24/95 � 570,921,000 S3,074.000 { 2/24/95 � 2/24l95 � ' S25o,000 i 2/24J95 � 2124/95 I i 551,079,000 ; 12l21/95 I 12/21/95 I ! 58.320,000 � 12/21/95 � 12/21l95 � 52,516.000 � 12/21/95 i i ° 51.214,171,128 � � �1.214,171.128 .�irpon tioise Report m ANR EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD �Sark Atwood, Esq. Galiand. Kharasch. �torse 3: Garfinkle Washington. D.C. Lee L. Blackman, Esq. �1cDermoa. Will & Emery l.os An�eles. Calif. Dr. Clifford R. Bragdon, AICP Dean. School of �via[ion & Transportation Dowlin� Co(leee Eliot Cutler, Esq. Cuder & Stanfield Washington. D.C. J. Spencer Dickerson Senior Vice President American Association oF Airport Execurives Edward J. DiPolvere Administrator. Nacional Associa[ion of Noise Concrol Officials Richard G. "Dick" Dyer Airpott Environmen[al Specialist. Division of Aeronautics, Calif. Dept. of Transportation E. Tazewell Ellett, Esq. Ho;an & Hartson Washing[on. D.C. Julie H. Ellis, Esq. tvtanaeino Director „ Federa] Express Corporation Ange11�1. Garcia Co-Chairman Citizens A�ainst Newark Noise E.H. "Nloe" Haupt tilanager. Airport and Environmental Services, National Business AircraFt Associa[ion Robert P. Siiverherh, Esq. Basileo. Silverber; & Goldman Washineton. D.C. Joanne bV. Young, Esq. Baker & Hosee[Itr Washineron. D.C. Noise PFCs , from top of p. 73 •�6,9g1,713 (0.� percent) for noise monitorinQ systems: •��,611,367 (0.6 percent) for a"miscellaneous" cate�ory that included noise barriers, blast fences, hush houses, maintenance run-up pads, and residential surveys; and •�6.�31.46� (0.5 percent) for noise mitiaation plannin� projects.� , ON THE AGENDA... June 20-28 Semi-annual meetin� of the Acoustical Society of America, Seattle, WA (contacrElaine Moran; tel: (516) 576-2360). Juiv 12-1� Transportation Research Board's A1F04 Conference on � Transportation Related Noise and Vibration, St. Pe[ersburg, FL (contact Win Lindeman, FI. DOT; tel: (850) 483-2914). July 22-2� Annual meetin� of the National Organization to Insure a Sound-controlled Environment (NOISE), Ti7oznton, CO (near Denver); (contact Dennis McGrann, Suite 900, 601 Pennsyivania Ave, N�N, l�ashin�ton, DC 20004; tel: (202) 434-3163; fax (20Z) b39-8238)- pus, 20-? 1 American Association of Ainl. ort Executives' Aircraft y Noise and Land Use Plannin� ManaQement Workshops, Ivlilwaukee, WI (contact AAAE; tel: (703) 824-0504 or fax-on-demand: (1-800-470-ARPT). Sept. 1�- I� American Association of Airport Executives' Fall Leeislative Issues Conference, Washington, DC (contact AAAE: tel: (703) $?40504 or fax-on-demand: E l -800-470-ARPT). Oc�. �-7 Airports Council International - North America's 7th Resional Conference & Exhibition, Marriott's Orlando 1Norid Center (contact ACI, 177� K St., NW, Washin�ton, DC 20006; tel: (202) 293-8�00; fax (202) 3;1-1362).� AIRPORT ��OISE REPORT Anne H. Kohut, Publisher �targuerite Lambert, Production Coordinator Charles F. Price, Contribu�ing Editor; �nne 1�cobs, Circulation Editor, i�Iaria T. Norton, Production Editor Publishe� ?� times � year at 43973 Urbancrest Ct.• �sPC c� ��9'��1�� Phone: (%0�) 729-�4867; FAX: (703) 729-4��3• .-�uthoriza�ion to photocopy items for ineernal or personal use, or the internal or personal use of specific cHents. is granted by Airpon Noise RepoR. pro�•ided �hat the base fee of USS 1.03 per page per copy is paid dirzctly ro Copyrigh� Clzarance Center. 27 Con�ress Street, Salem, �lA 01970. USA. �,iny ott �oise Repor � ;,._ - �' ,;; � �, , � - �: �. , , - s - ;; _. �.l ��i . _... _. ... :, �,,. ,�,,.,, .. _. June 19, 1998 NIr. Doug Powers, Interim Tower Chief Federal Aviation Administration 6311 34th Avenue South l�Iinneapolis, MN 5�450 Dea.r NIr. Powers: This letter is to forward an o�cial copy of a City Council resolution adopted on Tuesday, June 16, 1998 by the Mendota HeiQYits City Council. Resolution No. 93-35, RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PROLONGED HEADING VIOLATIONS CONTR.ARY TO ADOPTED RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR NOISE MITIGATION AT MSP NTERNATIONAL AIRPORT was adopted in response to repeated air tr�c patterns north of the esta.blished southeast corridoi boundaries. � Residential areas in Mendota Heights that are outside the southeast comdor are experiencing low level overflights on a repetitive basis and if appears that the FA.A Corltrol Tower.is not concerned about following the established comdor procedures. While we realize that construction activity this suminer has changed air traffic patterns and that thunderstorm activity can result in ad�usted air tr�c patterns, activity north of runway heading 090° has become too frequent and regular �- over the last year. As stated in the attached resolution, the continued practice of southeast corridor violations on �the � north is unacceptable and contrary to the established rules and procedures for noise mitiaation. If the MAC and the FAA are unable to follow the established corridor and noise mitigation procedures, it may be necessary that amended rules and regulatiuns be adopted with all the proper environmental rules and reQulations, including public hearings. Sincerely, �,�-� ��,�.,�,,�- Kevin Batchelder City Administrator cc: Bruce Vento, House of Representatives James Oberstar, House of Representatives Paul Wellstone, U.S. Senate �� Rod Grams, U.S. Senate �� S 'iY4, �"TQ1'� 1101 Victoria Curve • Mendota Heights, ytN ' S5118 (612) 452-1850 • FA:i 452-8940 CITY OF iV1E�(DOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, iV1IiV�tESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 98-35 RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE OFFICIAL NO'I'ICE OF PROLONGED HEADIiVG ViOLATIONS CONTR�RY TO ADOPTED R.ULES A.1�iD REGULATIONS FOR NOISE I�IITIGATION AT MSP I�tTERl'YATIONAL A.IRPORT WHER.EAS, residents of the City of Mendota Heijhts located in residential areas north of TH 110 between Delaware Avenue and Le:cington Avenue did expezience repetitive, low level overfliQhts on Sunday, June 14, 1998 between the hours of 6:15 p.m. and 7:=�� p.m.; and tiVHEREAS, these residential areas are approximately 1% miles north of the Southeast Corridor; and � WWI3EREAS, these residential areas are well north of the 095 ° Corridor Policy Boundary and the FA.A 090° Operational Corridor Boundary for air tr�c; and (. WI�REAS, these repetitive overfliQhts were eYpressly obtrusive because of their low level takeoff profile; and ti�'HEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the FAA. have we11 established procedures for the operation of the Southeast Corridor for noise mitigation purposes which require aircraft to be located between a 090° heading and/or a heading which will track on or north of the 30L localizer, and WHEREAS, informational data from the �irport Noise and Operations Monitorina Svstzm's (ANOyIS) monthly Comdor Gate Penetration Analysis clearly demonstratzs a� sianificant and roLtine diveraence from the established procedures for Runtivav 12L/30R, and ti�'�HEREAS, Comdor Gate Penetration �.n�lysis data since June of 1997 clearlv demonstrates a monthly averaQe of =�.�% oFali Carrier Jet Depanures on Runtiva�- 1?L/30R are violatinQ the required Corridor Procedures tivith e�cursions north of �he comdor boundaries. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Minneapolis-St. Paul vletropolitan Airport Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport are hereby notified that the continued practice of southeast corridor violations to the north is unacceptable and contrary to the established rules and procedures for noise mitiaation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED if the Metropolitan Airport Commission a.nd the Federal Aviation Administration are unable to follow the established corridor and noise mitiQation procedures, that amended rules and re�ulations be adopted after complying with federal environmental rules and regulations, including a public hearina on any chanaes. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heiahts this 16th day of June, 1993. CITY OF �iENDOTA HEIGHTS $y Charles E. Mertensotto/s/ Charles E. Mertensotto, �layor ATTEST: / -¢��'-?��-2� _`�'-��?`.--� K thleen i�S. Swanson, City Clerk ti C C 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. • �q IVIETROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEIVIENT COUNCIL General Meeting June 23, 1998 7:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota . Call to Order, Rali Call Approval of Minutes of Meeting May 26, 1998 Introduction of Invited Guests Receipt of Communications Technical Advisor's Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary Vice Chairpersons Vote ANOMS Orientation . June 12, 1998 Operations Committes Report - Mark Salmen Report of the MAC Commission Meeting - Bob Johnson Persons Wishing to Address the Council Other Items Not on the Agenda Adjournment Next Meeting: July 28, 1998 NIINUTES I�•tETROPOLI�'AI�I AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATENIENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING Nlay 26, 1998 7:30 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Nlinneapolis, Minnesota Call to Order Roll Call The meeting �vas called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and the secretary was asked to call the roll. The following members were in attendance. Bob Johnson Mark Salmen Brian Simonson T.J. Horsager Dick Keinz Brian Bates Steve Minn Nathae Richardson Neil Ctark ( � � Mike Cramer -- Joe Lee Tom Hueg Dawn Weitzel John Nelson Lance Staricha Jane Vanderpoel Ed Porter Dale Hammons Kevin Batchelder Jill Smith Mayor Charles Mertensotto Manny Camilon Sunfish Lake Advisors Roy Fuhimaiui Chad Leqve Cindy Greene Alton Gasper Visitors MBAA NWA DHL Ainvavs Sun Country Airlines MAC Airborne Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis Minneapolis St. Paul Richfield Bloomington Eagan Eagan Burnsville Inver Grove Heights Mendota. Heights Mendota Heights Mendota Heights St. Louis Park Madhu Singh MAC MAC FAA MAC Commissioner NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING ' DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH 15 June 1997 Melissa Scovronski Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council 6040 - 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 RE: Sunfish Lake - MASAC Representation FILE NO.: 211.02 - 98.01 Dear Ms. Scovronski: As a part of our firm's service to the City of Sunfish Lake, we pravide alternate representation at MASAC meetings that City Administrator Glenda Spiotta is unable to attend. I have been the primary support person ta Ms. Spiotta for MASAC representation. The purpose of this letter is to inform you that due to a reassignment of client responsibilities, Brad Digre of our office will replace me as the alternate representative to Ms. Spiotta. Mr. Digre will be representing Sunfish Lake at the 23 June 1998 MASAC meeting. Therefore, please direct all future N9ASAC related correspondence or inquiries to Mr. Digre's attention at the address or phone number below. If you have any questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact our office or Ms. Spiotta at 455-2163. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSU�TANTS, If�C. / � /�' -- -. l _ / � D. Daniel Licht Planner / Anatyst pc. Frank Tiffany Glenda Spiot#a 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM 1VfASACNOISE MONITORINGAND INFORMATIDNREQUEST FORlt� 1998 ra� Date: Name: Address: Phone: Is this a one-time request: Yes or No � � On whose beha(f are you requesting: Yourself City Council Mayor Citizen Organization Other � Beginning Ending If no, what is the expected time frame for this request? to Which of the following best describes the nature of yonr request: (Circle a11 that apply) Ground Noise Overflights Run-Ups Contours Part 150 Other PLEASE WRITE OUT YOUR REQUEST HERE AND/OR ATTACHANYLETTERS OR Over Please 1 Piease indicate the 1998 MASAC objectives supported by this this request: ❑ To provide information to the 11�IAC in their efforts to communicate changes in operations, due to construction to the surrounding communities. � Evaluate departure compliance through the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor and make any necessarv changes to the relevant procedures. � Review the A�VO�LIS system and noise monitors, and evaluate the need and placement ojadditrona! remote monitoring towers. Also, evaluate remote monitoring capabilities. � Request Air TraJfic Control personne! to make a presentation on how A�1SP operations are conducted. � Look at providing incentives to carriers in acquiring and operating factory-made Stage ill aircraf�. ❑ Investigate how GPS and other NAV Aids cou/d help alleviate aircrafl noise. ❑ Review the NADPs and compliance. ❑ Continue drscussion of Part I SO contour generation. Please send your request via mail to: MASAC Secretary, 6040 28th Avenue S., Mrnneapolis, MN 55450 or fax it to :(612) 725-6310. Request #: Staff Contact: Date Received: Is this a Phone Or Written Request? Approved By: Approval Date: Data Availability: Monitoring Start Date: Monitoring Stop Date: Analysis Start Date: Analysis Stop Date: Comple[ion Date: 2 � METROPOLITA.N AIRC�.AFT SD�,IND ; ABAT�MENT COUNCIL TO: FRC)NI: SUBJECT: DATE: � � ' � ;1 MASAC Members Chad C.eqve, ANOMS Coordinator Vice-Chairperson Elections June 16, 1998 NIASAC At the June 1998 NIASAC meeting elections will be held for two Vice-Chairperson positions. The vacancies are a function of the departure of former vice chairpersons Tom HueQ and Scott Bunin. Staff would like to thank these two individuals for their dedication, commiCment and contribution� to the goals and initiatives of MASAC and the MASAC Operations Committee. Elections will be held per the Bi-laws which state: Vzce-Chairperson To serve in the absence or during disability of the Chairperson, the representatives on the Council may, by majority vote of those in attendance at any regular or special meeting, elect a first and second �ce-Chairperson, who shall preside at meetings of the Council, with the Chairperson's power to call rrieetings and who shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the absent or disabled Chairperson. Lf there are any questions or comments prior to the meeting please contact me at 725-6328. METROPOLITAN AIRCI.AFT SOUND ABATEMEI�TT CO UNCIL !� �' �� 1� TO: MASAC FROlV1: Chad Leqve, ANOMS Coordinator SUB,�ECT: ANOMS Orientation ]Dt�'TE: June 16, 1998 MASAC Over the past years communities surrounding Minneapolis/St. Paul Internadonai Airport (MSP) have grown to rely on a means of objectively quantifying and analyzing the resultant impacts from MSP on their communities. The Airport Noise Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) at Minneapolis/St. Paul offers the objective analytical prowess that the coinznunities have come to depend on. Through the acquisition of flight tracks (ARTS data) and monitored noise data, ANOMS provides airspace and aircraft noise analytical abilities structured around objective actual data sets. As a result MAC's �' �� ANOMS program has proliferated into not only a public relations tool, but a means of input into airport planning, airspace utilization quantification/analysis, and feasibility assessments for operationaU procedural amendments. At the June 1998 MASAC meeting staff will give a thorough presentation regarding the ANOMS program at the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. MINUTES MASAC OPERATIONS COIVIMITTEE JUNE 12, 1998 The meeting was held at the Metropolitan Airports Commission West Terminal Building North Star Conference Room, and calied to order at 10:00 a.m. The foilowing members were in attendance: Members: Mark Salmen, Chairman - NWA John Nelson - Bloomington Kevin Batcheider — Mendota Heights Jon Hohenstein - Eagan Dick Keinz - MAC Dick Saunders - Minneapolis Advisorv: Chad Leqve - MAC Kay Hatlestad - MAC Ron Giaub - FAA NWA CMO Cindy Greene - FAA Visitors: Bob Kirmis— Eagan _ � � ' RMT SITE LOCATION ANALYSIS WRAP UP Chad Leqve, MAC, said this item was initially put on the agenda iri the event MASAC sent it back to the committee. He said if there were any further questions or comments, he could address them. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked staff to clarify what steps would need to be taken in order to continue the process of purchasing and mounting the RMTs. Dick Keinz, MAC, said the budget request was currently in the CIP and that the CIP would have to be approved by the Commission. Once the CIP is approved, staff will proceed with purchasing and installing the RMTs. AIRPORT GROUND NOISE STUDY UPDATE Chad Leqve, MAC, said aii of the data acquisition has been completed for the study and that staff was on schedule to have a report availabie at the July Operations meeting. Mr. Leqve gave a brief overview of the study. r ➢ ➢ ➢ ➢ There were six sites selected to be monitored: two on the airport, two east of Cedar Avenue and two west of Cedar Avenue. Seven full days of data have been acquired. The sites west of Cedar Avenue were in Christian Park and at 16`h Avenue. Two of the monitors were manned during the evening hours: one on airport and one in the community. Whenever possible, the person on the airfield recorded all operations on the field, including the heading of aircraft during run-ups. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked staff what types of ineasurements had been taken. Kay Hatlestad, MAC, said both A and C noise weightings had been monitored. Mr. Nelson also asked how the data would be reported (i.e. noise metric). Chad Leqve, MAC, said staff hadn't made a final decision at this point. (: John Neison, Blooming.ton, asked how staff was distinguishing the noise associated with � different types of operations. Chad Leqve, MAC, said the monitors recorded continuously and the person on the fieid recorded the various operations as they happened. Mr. Leqve also reiterated that the study was not a low frequency noise study but nighttime ground noise study. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked if it was possible that ground operations would change because af the results of the analysis. Chad Leqve, MAC, said the Operations Committee would have to discuss the results and, if at that point specific issues are identified, solutions could be discussed. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked what the schedule was for the report to be completed. Chad Leqve, MAC, said the report would be completed by the July Operations Committee meeting. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, asked what frequencies the monitors are able to pick up. Kay Hatlestad, MAC, said the monitors are able to measure 'A' weighting and 'C' weighting and that the C weighting picks up more of the low frequencies. She said if the difference between the 'A' weighting and the 'C' weighting was more than 5 decibels, it could be assumed that the low frequency noise was significant. (' Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, asked about a low frequency noise study he had dated April 1997 and asked (1) if it had been done by the noise staff and (2) if the data could be used in the study. Dick Keinz, MAC, said the noise staff had not been involved with any low frequency noise study, and that it was probably part of the EIS for the north/south runway. Chad Leqve, MAC, said he didn't believe staff would need additional data for the study. He said the data already gathered was very robust. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, asked if staff had done any research into noise studies at other airports. Mr. Leqve said staff had consulted some studies to do research on methodologies. He said, though, that staff did not believe it was appropriate to apply the findings at other airports to MSP. Kay Hatiestad, MAC, said contours for run ups were aiso being generated in order to compare them to the monitored data. Chad Leqve, MAC, said in addition to the contours, the report would include interviews with the carriers and their maintenance crews as to their run up procedures and what their needs are. CONSTRUCT/C?N UPDATE Chad Leqve, MAC, said the construction project for the south paralie! runway was going well. He said the project was in its 9`" week and that June 15'h is the projected sta�t date for the first layer of concrete to be laid. He noted that the contractors had only lost 3 days and that the project was on track ta be completed by mid-August. Mr. �eqve then referred to the weekly o�erations updates that had been included in the packet. He used the week of April 13-19 h as an example noting that the departures off of runway 22 were within the predicted range of 100-170 operations. He said departure operations off of runway 22 ranged from mid 20% to mid 30%. Chairman Salmen said NWA's pilot acceptance of the shortened runway had been generally good. He also noted that with the increase in temperatures, fewer jet aircraft would be able to use the shortened runway for departures. He said in wet conditions, 727's can't land on the shortened runway, as well. Chad Leqve, MAC, said staff would continue to update the web site with weekly operational information. John Nelson, Bloomington, asked staff if it would be possible to brief representatives on ANOMS and how it works. He asked if it would be possible for the ANOMS computer to be set up at one of the meetings. Chad Leqve, MAC, said a full briefing on ANOMS was on the agenda for the June 23, 1998 MASAC meeting. There was a brief discussion about possibly setting up a computer in the MASAC room or having interested representatives tour the noise office on the same day that the tower tour is scheduled. Ron Glaub, FAA, asked about the significant difference in operations off runway 22 between the week of May 7`h and the week of April 27'h. He asked staff if they had identified 3 any thing in particular that couid be attributed to such a large difference. It was generally �. agreed that the weather (temperature and wind direction/speed) would be the most significant factor. Cindy Greene, FAA, said runway 22 cannot be �sed if there are strong winds from the northeast. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, asked if the shortening of the south parallel runway had changed the altitude of aircraft on arrivals and/or departures over Minneapolis. Cindy Greene, FAA, said that because the end of the runway is not as near to Minneapolis as it usually is, aircraft altitudes are probably about two hundred feet higher on both arrivais and departures. Jon Hohenstein, Eagan, asked if aircraft are being tumed earlier because of the shortened runway. Cindy Greene, FAA, said the turns have not been changed. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, asked if the north parailel runway's operations had changed because a resident had complained to him that there seemed to be more fiights over her home off of 38'h Avenue S. south of 50�'' Street. Cindy Greene, FAA, said operations off the north parallel runway had not changed but that it was possible she was experiencing additional west bound traffic departing runway 04. She could also be experiencing spool up noise on runway 22. Ms. Greene said that 33 departures are using the full length of runway 22 for departures compared to the usual 4 departures. Jon Hohenstein, Eagan, said during the first weeks of construction there was a noticeable increase in traffic from runway 22 over Eagan. He said during the past coupie of weeks, C though, there had not been as many and asked if the tower had been doing something different. Cindy Greene, FAA, expiained that when aircraft arrive on 30 left and right, the controllers have to protect the arriving traffic and must give headings off 22 of 200 degrees or more. She said in this case, the aircraft would not fly over Eagan. If aircraft are arriving on 12 left and right, departures off of runway 22 can be directed in the same manner as departures off of runways �2 left and right. Mr. Hohenstein said it would b� important next year to hold informational meetings for the City of Eagan (and possibly Burnsville), as was done for Bloomington and Richfield this year. � CORRESPONDENCE There were three items of correspondence included in the packet. The first was frorn the acting air traffic control tower manager outlining the variables affecting the use of the non-simultaneous departure procedure. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, thanked the FAA for writing the letter and said he would distribute the information to the appropriate people. The second correspondence was from the City of Eagan indicating its support of the locations for the additional RMT sites #25 and #26. It also indicated the desire of the residents in southern and western Eagan to have the RMT sites associated with the north/south runway installed at an earlier date than has been planned. � The third correspondence was aiso from the City of Eagan in regard to operations in the corridor. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, said he was concerned that the final MASAC/OPS schedule did not reflect the intent of the Operations Committee to examine the corridor issue in its entirety. John Neison, Bioomington, said he thought the schedule was purposely narrowed down to specific corridor issues rather than an overview of the specific corridor procedures. He said if the corridor procedures needed to be examined in full, the Inver Grove Heights representative should be invited to participate in the discussions in order to be sure all issues are addressed at one time. He suggested the discussions could be held during the fourth quarter of the year and that the individual cities should submit their suggestions for discussion before then. Jon Hohenstein, Eagan, said one of the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee's recommendations was to reexarnine the corridor in its entirety and not just individual procedures. He also said that since the corridor was not being used in a normal fashion this year or next and because his replacement would need to be brought up to speed on the issues first, the issue of the corridor should be put off until the fourth quarter. Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, said the Mendota Heights City Council was currently working on recommendations for the corridor and that addressing the issue during the fourth quarter would be acceptable. It was suggested that staff draft a letter to the cities impacted by corridor operations, which would solicit suggestions for consideration by the Operations Committee on the issue of the corridor. A copy of Eagan's letter will be included as an example. The letter will also indicate that the Operations Committee would be taking up the corridor issue in September or October of 1998 and the cities should have their suggestions into the Operations Committee by the August 1998 Committee meeting. John Nelson, Bloomington, also suggested that the letter reference the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee's recommendation in regard to the corridor. There was some discussion on the MSP Noise Mitigation Committee's intentions for the corridor and an expressed desire by the members to fulfill their recommendation. Jon Hohenstein, Eagan, suggested that the issue wouldn't necessarily have to be addressed this year, but thought it would be beneficial for MASAC to look at the corridor in gene�al terms and make decisions based on what is best operationally for all concerned parties. Dick Keinz, MAC, cautioned that any additional study of corridor operations be focused on something productive and that MASAC would need to work independently of the communities so as to avoid the counter-productive problems of the early 1990's. 5 Kevin Batchelder, Mendota Heights, said it was his understanding that the non- simultaneous corridor departure study would include weekends, as well as weekdays. There was a short discussion regarding what hours should be included. It was decided, based on information provided by Cindy Greene, FAA, that the hours of 15:00 on Saturday to 13:00 on Sunday be inciuded in the study. KEVIN BATCHELDER, MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MOVED AND JOHN NELSON, BLOOMINGTON, SECONDED, TO AMEND THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 8, 1998 OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING TO INCLUDE IN THE S1MU�TANEOUS CORRIDOR DEPARTURE STUDY THE WEEKEND HOURS OF 15:00 SATURDAY THROUGH 13:00 ON SUNDAY. THE VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS. MOTION CARRIED. Dick Saunders, Minneapolis, also noted that he was in attendance at the May 8, 1998 meeting but was not incfuded on the list of attendees. JOHN NELSON, B�OOMiNGTON, MOVED AND JON HOHENSTEIN, EAGAN, SECONDED, TO AMEND THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 8, 1998 MEETING TO ADD DICK SAUNDERS, MINNEAPOLIS, TO THE LIST QF ATTENDEES. THE VOTE WAS UNANIMOUS. MOTION CARRIED. The minutes wiil be amended as such. The next Operations Meeting wili be held on July 10, 1998. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Melissa Scovronski Committee Secretary � ( C f, MASAC OPEI.ATIONS COMIVIITTEE TO: FROM: SUBJEC7C: � 1'� I •• MASAC Operations Committee Chad Leqve, ANOMS Coordinator Remote Monitoring Tower (RMTs) Site Locations June 5, 199$ After several analysis and presentations a decision was made at the May 1998 MASAC Operations Committee meeting to accept stafFs' recommendation for the procurement and site locations of 5 new additional Remote Monitoring Towers (RMTs). The recommendation was then forwarded to the May 1998 MASAC meeting at which time it was endorsed and forwazderi to the Planning and Environment Committee for approval. Remaining questions and comments will be addressed by staff at the June 1998 MASAC Operations meeting. If you have any questions or comments please contact me at 725-6328. MASAC OPEI.ATIONS CUNiMITTEE C 1►/� ►/ �� ► ��1 ►/ I TO: FROM: SUB,JECT: I3ATE: MASAC Operations Committee Chad Leqve, ANOMS Coordinator Airport Ground Noise Study June 5, 1998 MASAC At the April 1998 MASAC meeting a Airport Ground Noise Study was initiated in an effort to determine the sources of ground noise on the airport and the resultant impacts of such operations on the surrounding communities. Since that meeting a period of substantial data acquisition was accomplished and the preliminary methodology was developed. The Airport Ground Noise Study is in the analysis phase and approximately 1/3 complete. As stated at the May 1998 MASAC meeting the monitoring is comQlete and the various sources of data have been ( collected. Data analysis and report generation will comprise the next phase of the study. The \. completed report will be presenteti at the July 1998 MASAC Operations Committee meeting followed by the July 1998 MASAC meeting. A report update will be provided by staff at the June 1998 MASAC Operations Committee meeting. If you have any questions or comments please contact me at 725-6328. 1VIASAC C�PEI.ATIONS COMMITTEE TO: ,�� SUB,JECT: DATE: �"• 1` • MASAC Operations Committee Chad Leqve, ANOMS Coordinator Construction Update June 5, 1998 As we are all aware the construction project is progressing extremely well at Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport. Such activities impose alternate modes of operations in an effort to accommodate the construction activity. The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Aii Carriers are working together to ensure the airport maintains a safe, smooth and efficient mode of operation throughout the construction period. Due to the need for operational modifications at the airport, operations are occuiring in a manor non- ( l standard for a typical summer. At the June 12, 1998 MASAC Operations Committee meeting a " construction update will be provided including operational updates form MAC (refer to the enclosed Weekly Operations Updates) and Northwest Airlines. If you have any questions or comments please contact me at 725-6328. �(�tropuiit.�n .��rpurt� C�mmi�sion All 4�perations Runway Use Report �pril 13 - 1, 1998 2.1 % Runway �p�re Count Percentage pq. A 140 3.1 °Io 12L A 576 12.8% 12R A 371 8.3% 22 A 61 1.4% 30L A 1570 35.1% 30R A 1760 39.3% Total Arr. 447� l�°Io Q4. D 91 2.1 % 12L D 543 12.3% 12R D 220 5.0% 22 D 1349 30.6% 30L D 475 10.8% 30R D 1726 39.2% Totai Dep. 4444 100% Page l Aviation Noise & SateUite Programs �tetropolican .�irporc, Commission Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report �pril 13 - 1, 1998 ( 2.1 °Io 49.0 % 21.2 2.6 °Io�= 32.1 0 1.3% � � n D /. � % 74.9% ;' /� 16.8% Runway ��re Count Percentage 04 A 78 2.6% 12L A 464 15.5% 12R A 172 5.7% 22 A 40 1.3% 30L A 839 28.0% 30R A 1406 46.9% Total Arr. 2999 100 °I'o 04 D 61 2.1% 12L D 422 14.2% 12R D 78 2.6% 22 D 953 32.1% 30L D 2l7 7.3% 30R D 1238 41.7% Total Dep. 2969 100% ;. �' ytetropulit�n .�irpurts Commi;sion ; . Nighttime - All Operations Runway Use Report Apri] 13 - 1, 1998 7.0 % , � i•, � � .. .� ,. r.,,..... ..._ . „ _..,n,..,.._, .. . ___.. ,...,�,. ,... .."/ _w.,._,. �,�� I . ' � i'. ■�, � .'. �. � .,� �, � ' '. � . . , . . ��, ��IIII�� j � � t 4. ..,: • ��; �� ' I ' ":,. .a...�.: i � � t � t L ` I , : . ,,, _. .. :.x:....": [ . . :.... . . ..... „ , .. . , . ,. . .,... . ..,.. ... :... ..,: -,, .:..,�,. ...� ,,/ �� • • , • , � �� , • .J � I/, I�. , • • ' „' �� , ' • • ',, , � . • • I �� I� 44 $ ..# t ;�. . _ _ . . .. � fi � .. . � � a { � �a �`•; l� • � � ��i � , � � k�} y �iF� � ivM1 1�� -.—� �.. - + � l� 4 k F. ..,...,... _.�_........ ,.....,..�L.;S-..w ..:x_ .....�.. ..,....:�::. ....:_:,.-- .-. .�-.—.=-.n,....—^'--_,.,.,.,_ �tetropolitan .-�irpores Commission - Nighttime Carrier Jet �perations Runway Use Report April 13 - 1, 1998 �, ti 7.1 % 32.1 % 12.3 % 2.3 % ,' � a �, � 1 � �'��;� '�- � ' ' �"�i°�� J�" � �� D y � �~� � � �a 0 � , ,; o �' �� 1 o� , / �. 25.4% �� /// ; 27.6 °Io �o 33.2 % Runway �p�� Count Percentage 04 A 58 25.4% 12L A 24 10.5 %a 12R A 4 1.8% 22 A 28 12.3% 30L A 36 15.8% 30R A 78 34.2% Total Arr. 228 l�% 04 D 19 7.1 �Io 12L D 70 26.1% 12R D 19 7.1% 22 D 74 27.6% 30L D 17 6.3% 30R D 69 25.8% Total Dep. 268 100% �'iC[CV(.��!I�.�tl .ilfji�tft� 1.v1.��Gi»li)Il All i�peraiions i2unway �Jse.Report Ap�il 20 - 2, 1998 1.3% � � i� � � � ' �• i � e ....... . . ... ...:: .. „ . ,.,. . .. . .., ,,,.. ,: x' ,w.. _:'�. : • •■ � ,' . _... �■ ■ � '� '�■ � . • ". �� • , ,,, �i■. � , ..,� i ' , � � ��' . . �u,r ��..:r.. � .�. .,_. _, �-._.�� ' , ; ,� ; Z 3 f t t � - _ t � , t. �., sv. � i. �. �- :�. '. 'i � E „r.. 4y . / 1 � � ' � � ,� � .,,._L�'�s m c:,. ,m. ��...,. ,.,A�., ,,, .,w.�..:. - . ��n.. �� • � / �� , ' ♦ Ii, �� , • • • ", ,1 ,•.... y �,•6'., �tY&Nf..., .:n.:x..;• ...�,. I,, t» r., �a��k,� �;S�i ""'i�l��{ig4�: �, 1 ( ( � �� 1 ��. _�� .� � � 'iy�h�,�}.i:.�',fi4?i�,� ,..:�.,F,T...m..x,�...�:h.,m"�, d�+z, ,,. .... .tx.. M�.n,_rtx, �.,.,...:�„�-v . . w..::�.v., . ,.,�.w...�,:.;..; Pa�e 1 Aviation Noise & Satellite Proerams yte�rop��it.�n :'+�ip�r, L�mmi��wn , Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report Apri120 - 2, 1998 ( � 1.3 % � �8.9 °I� 43.3 1.5 % � Runway �p�i,e Count Percentage 04 A 63 2.1% 12L A 914 30.6% 12R A 378 12.7% 22 A 45 1.5% 30L A 634 21.3% 30R A 949 31.8% Total Arr. 2983 100% 04 D 38 1.3% 12L D 775 26.2% 12R D 164 5.5 �Io 22 D 1125 38.1% 30L D l02 3.5% 30R D 749 25.4% Total Dep. 2953 100% �, : �,(�tr�pvlitan .�,irports C�mmis�ion Nighttime - All tJperations Td.unway Use Report Apri120 - 2, 1998 � S.0% A 20.3 % 2 .4 °Io J : ) '. 12 �� 16.3% 0 • /•'. � � '. .� ,,. .... .. . . .. ......... .... ,... ._ , , :, _. _:.. _.,..,., ., . _.�, . .,:,:.e,._,., . ,' .�1,,: „. • � . . . , • ' ,, . .�� • � � 1, �,■ I ��i �' ��l�� '�' � ' "' �'��'��l�� - � ' - 1 � � � �'�l��! � • - 1 . . µ : � � #. . . n. _ � �. __ , '�.�l� ` �� ', Y ? a. .,........ �.n:..... .: . il.!. a., xr,x�........ _ . �..�,�. , o �«t„_�..�. . .. , • .....�■■ z,a, wr.��, '/� .. . .�I�■■ • • ' II � „/ ��-� �'. , , „/ ��■�, • ', �'��,�I�.�' , , �'�S I, ...y ■ :..�.�� , �, .. . ... : � .. ..�:.e.: c . ...,..s>. ..u._ - _ .v r _ ' � A�� ) y C'�i�9 r. . . ,. r.:�..� ..,. . . �.,. .: . � t s r� z G . -c,�P �' '—' � � 1 1 rR�#�,� q p %��.,.4 �, y � �tetropo(itan .-�irports Commis:,ion Nigh�time Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report Apri120 - 2,1998 � � � � 4.6% �2Z% � 18.0 .3% 0 20.5 % �- 37.2% %� 32.2% 36.0% Runway �p�re Count Percentage 04 A 42 20.5 %a 12L A 51 24.9% I 2R A 9 4.4% 22 A 37 18.0% 30L A 41 20.0% 30R A 25 12.2% Total Arr. 205 1�% � 04 D 12 4.6% l2L D 79 30.3% 12R D 15 5.7% 22 D 97 37.2% 30L D l3 5.0% 30R D 45 17.2% Total Dep. 2b1 100% � n...,....-... i.i..:�o D. C...el �:.o D ............... Dnrt< d C �te[ropolitan ,�irporu Commission A,il i�perations Iaunway Use Report Apri127 - l�Ia 3, 1998 - 0.5 % Runway �� Count Percentage p4 A 65 1.4°Io 12L A 1143 25.1 °Io 12R A 947 20.8% 22 A 11 0.3% 30L A 1058 23.2% 30R A 1329 29.2% Total Arr. 4553 1�% pq, j� 21 0.5% 12L D 979 21.8% 12R D 356 7.9% 22 D 1997 44.6% 30L D 68 1.5% 30R D t062 23.7�Io Total Dep. 44�3 100% �tetropo(ir.an :�irports Commission Carrier Jet �Jperatio�s Runway Use Report Apri127 - NIa 3, 1998 � 0.2 °Io � - _3.� °Ic 43.9 0.2% ; ��'�'��2 12 �`�;. .� � � .��:� : ,,,,� �: �;� °� ; ��.� ;__ � _ � -� � v � �� 30 /' � �� '� �-'^� s � sa.z% 04 , 1.�% '�°° �,/' 27.s% 48.8 0 Runway A�v� Cosnt Percentage Departure 04 A � l 1.7% 12L A 858 28.0% 12R A 4$9 15.9% 22 A 5 0.2% 30L A 609 19.9% 30R A 1051 34.3% Totai Arr. 3063 l0U% 04 D 7 0.2% 12L D 714 23.7% l2R D 114 3.8°l0 22 D 1466 48.8% 30L D 30 t .0% 30R D 677 22.ScIo Total Dep. 3U08 100% � ,. � �tetropolitan .�irports Commission I�ighttime - All C)perations , .. �.tunway Use Report April 27 -�Ia 3, 199� � 1.7 % 15.3 °Io 26.2% 9.5 % 32.9% 0.5% � \ �0 v e /' i v' � '� � 63.8% 1�L'; � �0.1 % // . � , .. .i ,,. 1 � " ,_ ,. . ., .. ,:;, . ,. . ._, „ .. .. ..... . . . :.. .,. ;_.,. . .. . , .,.: �III �� .�, .:w �.. �� :.'. �� ' ' ��' IIIII�.�� „� iii� � • ' , ii'iii � ' • • • '�• ��. . ; t � 4r� . °',�� ', � i� . �- „ "� . • '- �� ' �' ��' � � ��' �� : . �,, �� , � � . � .,, ..x�w , z � , � �.,�� , ti � �� e f�; ,�� r�` �ke �, r� G 1 1' � , � a"+c � r +� �a�'��3�..r�.r.,.�.,��a:��.x�._,_....�_�..�.�....�.,.,.�.��__�..,, - Y(ecropolitan .�irpor[s Commission , Iolighttime Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report April 27 -1�Ta 3, 1998 � 0.0% , � ,•' � � .. .� ,,. . � I ,.2. , _ . : .. ., .;,,, ,. ,. � , , . . .. ..: .... . .. . . . . . ..... . . i�i 1 � ' ' � �� .�-�� r .,� '�■ � / • "� �� 1 "', irif■� � � ,+� 1' • � '•'"� ■ ., ,., . , ` F • ' ' II � �n . � I • . • � ...: � � . ...:..:�.. � ,. ;., . .. 1��.'�:.. .,, r n::. .-.�. .�,., , .,_..�e�, .. .�.:��.�: . ....;�. , � �,�., � . , , , I / ��■�■ , , I �� , • ", �� , � � / , "/ �I. , , , / ,// �� r • � "� y.,:. ��* [ . ..__,.. ,..�..,. . ..._:.. r ..�. ...,.,: � �'r�'f��k� k��` hi y-0 � � I/ '1 .F J.u} %rt' f J t " I � � . ,� 1 S E �. � j�w 74'��:. 0 -.r..p:,�-_,+„„ �,_...,..a,..�..:_�fi:��'.?''.r1":Yi;,,.1'�a.i�..�'�.. .:�.�.,..:,,,_�� ......::........ ....,.,.�� .....,:..:.:..,_..:..�... � C. �. �� `iCtr��{�ui�t.�n lirpurc, C,�mmi„i��n All Operatior�s Runway Use Report �Iay 7- Nlay 3, 1998 l.l % . � '', � , •. .� ,. .:. � . ... ..: , v,.. , ... .. �: , .,�., .. , . ..... , � .. .,_ :. : . ....... .. ._.�:, ...,:. �ii��■� 1 • ;�� . : . � � ' , ��■ � � .,� ��,�. � .,� iii� � • • • ", , � � . � ', s y` . i, { . } _ _: . a ` _ _ . �� I .. �� `11�.,��,�r.t`n.�:r,,�.�Rt....�, .�� I' • � I I 'I :...w.n�Lr�. � �...,, ..,.. . �. _.r ..,- ...r ,_ ,:.., ., .. «..<:,. , ,. �� . .. � . .. :: � � .. �� i �� i �� i • �� , III�I ■ , � �� • � 4 .... � � I II I �^{'Y ^�iT� }Si`� 5y1 3 �, p ..� � :„ � � I � I 1 ds ��,�Y}��I""�''�.+�'�-��. •'a / � Ir I / ��?{4235 "C�?� �g;nFf�4�� .� "�.r�.S..�i.a.:n�.� �.�-,�. �t�trupulitsn .��rpur[� C�inmis�i�n �arrier Jet Operations Runway Use Report l�Iay 7- i�Iay 3, 1998 � � 1.0 °Io � �r � 1...7 ,� 75.9 I :'•'� 0.4% : `— � ! 2 � • 12 �� ; . ��o�� :�� _�� yv � �� . C� 22.9% , �0.5 % � Runway �p�� Count Percentage 04 A 21 • 0.8% 12L A 1454 52.4% 12R A 654 23.5% 22 A 12 0.4% 30L A 198 7.1% 30R A 43$ 15.8%a Totai Arr. 2i77 1Q0% 04. D 26 1.0% 12L D 1211 44.1% 12R D 175 6.4% 22 D 983 35.8% 30L D 49 1.8% 30R D 299 10.9% Total Dep. 2743 1Q0% `:::tn,�uli�an ��rp��r�, ��mrni,.iun Nighttime - All Operations ' Runway Use Report �Iay 7-.�Iay 3, 1998 3.4 % 25.8% 38.2 % % �- 27.2% 3.7 % � 0 �` " � / % s ss.3% ;` , / 43.6 % �� . � '' , � � .. .� ,,. -�� °...'�■■ ...�_. ,. ,�_ ,...I',I> ,,• �. � �: '. � �: . � • •�, �■ • � 'I� �� ' • r � .,� 1 ' ■ ' '' ' "� ... ■'! ! :��■ I i I ; r ., F , ,.:�� ., �1,��.�� x ' ^ i , .. -,... .e ..,. � . ... ..:: . .. ........r,,...4 , . .. . .s... ..,,, _,: ..,..,. ... .. ,.._ ._.�,:. . ,..,., ��-��, , ' , . . �� , , ' , , �� , /I, �� , • 1 II� �■ , • , ��I , � . • /I • / �..—i.�., _ . . .,..- S :.1 4 . t J{ . . , � , " // r 1� � r � jy. frw U �. � / ��r. �F r�esf. wrrpl .�r� , b'm ' _ . P�aP i 4viarinri NnicP Rr CatPllit� Prnar�mc �letropuli�an .�irport> C�mmiss;on �ighttime Carrier Jet �per�tions Runway Use Report i��Iay 7- Nlay 3, 1998 . �, 2.6 % 28.3 % � 7.6 % 4.2 % � Runway �p�re Count Percentage 04 A 6 3.6% 12L A 51 30.9% 12R A 11 6.7% 22 A 7 4.2% 30L A 10 6.1% 30R A 80 48.5% Total Arr. 165 l0U% 04 D 5 2.6% 12L D 78 40.8% 12R D 8 4.2% 22 D 46 24.1 % 30L D 10 5.3% 30R D 44 23.0% Total Dep. 191 140°l0 U.S. Department of Transportat�on Federal Aviation Administ�ation : ••:. Mr. Mark Salmen MASAC Ops Committee Chairman Metropolitan Airports Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450-2799 Dear Mr. Salmen: Airport Traffic Controi Tower 6311 34th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 It is the understanding of the Minneapolis Rirpo�t Traffic Control Tower that the MASAC Ops Committee is attempting to do an evaluation of the Air Traffic Control utilization of the non-simultaneous departure procedures. As the Ops Committee and the City of Mendota Heights are aware, this procedure was implemented with the understanding that these headings would be utilized "whenever possible". This term was intentionally used because there are many variables that determine if this procedure is possible. , The two most basic requirements, as explained by Support Manager Cindy Greene, are the staffing of only one local controller, and only one aircraft at either of the parallel runways ready to depart at a time. Due to the infrequency in which these two require- ments are met befinreen 6:00 AM and 10:30 PM, there are rare times throughout the day in which non-simultaneous departure procedures are possible. I understand that the focus of the MASAC Ops evaluation will now be during the quiet hours af 10:30 PM and 6:00 AM. During this time period, under normal circumstances, there is only one local controller staffed. There is rarely an aircraft at each parallel ready to depart at the same time. There are, however, still enough variables present to make this evaluation by the MASAC Ops Committee difficult, and most �ike�y its vaiidity questionable. The requirement for head-to-head operations (land 30UR depart 12�/R) has an impact on the use of non-simultaneous departure procedures. Some of the variables associated with the impact of head to head operations are: 1. How far out the arrival is on the opposite direction final. 2. The speed of the arrival. 3. The type aircraft that is arriving and departing. 4. The weather conditions. 5. The ability of an arriving aircraft to see a departing aircraft. 6. The ability of a departing aircraft to see an arriving aircraft. 7. The willingness of either pilot to assume responsibility for visual separation. 2. ( Air traffic controliers e�aluate each of these variabies and make the decision which heading the departure is assigned. The controllers are weii aware of the non-simultaneous departure procedures and also take these into account in their decision making. The air traffic controller provides the required separation between an arrival and a departure, or between two departures. The method to obtain that separation varies from one controller to another. A controller may elect to utilize visual separation, vertical separation, lateral separation, or mereiy wait until the arrivai has landed. There is no way to provide the air traffic rationale for aircraft separation in each instance. The only scenario that can "normally guarantee" non-simultaneous headings is: One local controller, one aircraft ready to depart, No arrivals head-to-head, and weather not impacting the operation. Any questions may be directed through the MASAC Ops Committee to Cindy Greene, Minneapolis Air Traffic Control Tower Support Manager. Sincerely, .�-' . �---'-_�. C� , �-�--= ��.: - �---� .. D glas�. Powers Acting Air Traffic Manager � � _ __ ( :: ?vtav ?0, 1998 � Bob Johnson, Chair Vletropolitan :�ircraft Sound Abatement Council 60=�0 28`h Avenue South i�iinneapolis, M�t ��=��0 Dear Chair Johnson: rHor,��,s E��ra ti�4�� .4TRICIA AbVaDA BE,4 B�ONIQUIST SA�JDRA A. D�1F,SIN THEOGCRE 'vVACHTER C�ur �:� �"=m�,er5 THOMAS HEDGES � „ ,,^+�r s'r�t�r E. J. VAN OVERBEKE ..Iri C:eru In official action taken at its meeting of May ly, 1998, the Eagan City Council Yormally adopted a list of issues to be considered in VIASAC's review of the Eagan/Mendota Heights corridor. These include: • Corridor Compliance — the need to maintain operations between runway centerline and 95 degrees. • Altitude Analysis — identify the means and e;ctremes of operations' altitudes at one mile increments from the runway end to the Inver Grove Heights boundary on the east, Mendota Heights boundary on the north and Eagan boundary on the south and west. o Analysis of operations' consequences from runway redesignation to 10/30. • Modification of head-to-head procedures to eliminate the need for departures to diverge. • Feasibility of standard instrument departure procedure to narrow operations. • Non-simultaneous departure procedure analysis. • Identiiication of desirable flight tracks for geographic positioning systems implementation. • Potential use of navigationat aids for improved compliance with corridor procedures prior to GPS. - Rec �nsiu�r alternatit�e departur:, p:of les f�r �o�z-i�or o�erutions. I will be happy to provide additional information with respect ta these items at your convenience or at the MASAC Operations Committee meeting of June 12th. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Jo Hohenstein Assistant to the City Administrator JH/ms MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 �IIOT KNGB ROAD EA6AN. MINNESOTP, 55 1 22-1 897 PHONE (612) 681-4600 FAX (612)081-4612 rnn rat�� nan a;a� THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBO� OF STREN6TH AND GROWiH IN OUR COMMUNIT`( Equal Opportur�ity Empioyer MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 COACHMA�J POINT EAGAN. NiINNE50TA 55122 PHOf�lE. (6 i 2) 681-4300 i-ax !hi2)681-4360 � - ;': 2) d5d-8535 May ?0, 1998 Bob Johnson, Chair Nletropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council 6040 28`h Avenue South Vlinneapolis, MN 5�450 Dear Chair Johnson: THOMAS EGAN Mavor PATRIC!A AWADA BEA BLCMQUIST SANDRA A. MaSIN THEODORE `NACHTER �:�unC�� +lambers THOMAS HEDGES l.�N .Ayr�'�ira5`'�t�r E. J. VAN OVERBEKE Gty Cler�c In official action taken at its meetin� of May 19, 1998, the Eagan City Council adopted a recommendation by the Airport Relations Commission that the Gity support the identified locations for additional ANOMS monitor locations within proposed RMT sites #25 and #26. We look forward to working with MAC staff on identification of specific locations for the RMT's within these areas. We understand that with respect to RMT #26, the best location may be in another community. Please note that while the City is supportive of these particular locations, the recent increase in overflights of southern and western Eagan associated with the increased operations on Runway 4/22 have led to discussions by the City's Airport Relations Commission concerning the need for early installation of ANOMS monitors that would be utilized for the north/south runway. This matter will be further explored at the June meeting of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission and it is anticipated that a recommendation will go to the City Council at its meeting of June 16th. If action is taken, the information wiil be forwarded to the MAC and MASAC at that time. Thank you for your attention to these matters. SincPrety, � V Jo Hohenstein Assistant to the City Administrator �� MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE. (612) 681 •4600 FAX: (612) 681-4612 TDD (612) 454•8535 THE LONE OAK TREE THE SYMBOL OF STREN6TH AND GROWTN IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opporfunity Employer ��. MAINTENANCE FACILITY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 FAX: (612) 681-4360 TDD: (612) 454-8535 . � -: � •' � ♦'� � ! ., � � � • • ,. : • � r�, � � °' • : � . :, .` - � . ( ) N � cd � C.' N O � � � � a� o � v � p � �+, �p U O O� "' ,�.�"+ v�i "c7 � cCS O �'�"' .� .��+ � O � O � r�n �a O O "L7 � V cCS 0 ��» � .� v1 _ -v � o w � .� °' � a� a�i � `� � a �� Q, � • � CG � � = �U � � _N •� '� � � � � � � � � � N �� [ +� � °A a c}., � ... y,,, O � � Q .—� U O � o �" o � � � O � M .-a �O O [� M � M O `� N � h N N � � � h N • � . � M � 0 v � � � 0 U .� 0 � � � M O O O O O O C 00000�,,,� V'1 �-» M M � � 00 d' l� �� Cr� t/ 6R -Nth- 64 EH 64 6N-�} 6 � � L � � � < d; O� d; v1 [� C� � � �n O � O O � 6R F13 -- N N ^ (f} b4 Ff1 64 6 � � f 0 0 0 0� o� ��w..��Z] Q1 M 01 M C� M �f' fT rt N d' � .-� N v� 00 � 00 � N M �i- �n �O h c rnrno�c�rno�c o� o� o� o� rn o� c _ '�� Minneapolis / St. Paul International Airport :.... r-....:..:r�• , � MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Aircra, ft Sound Abatement Council c�r,�»�: Robert P.Johnson wr� c��;,,�,,: Thanas Hueg Technical rUlvisor. Roy Fuhrmann Srcreran•: 1leilssa srnvronskl Airharne Eap2ss: Brlan Bates Air Trunspon Assxiation: e��i r��c�W ALPA: Ron Jo6nson Cirv nf Bfoomington: Petrnna Lee Vem Wilmx Cin• nj8umn�i(fe: � e�� crn• of�,R�: Jon Ho6easlein Iaoce Starlcha Cin• of !m•er Grave Hrrghrs: Dele I�ammons Cin• of Mrndora Neighrs: JIII Smit6 Kevin Bakhekier Ciry• ojMinneapolis: Dean L(ndberg Slsve 111nn a« r.« Glenn Strmd Sendre Coivin Roy Mlke Cramer c;rv of��re: Krkm! Stok� Dawn Weltzcl Cin• ojSr. Lours Park: R.obert Adrcws City ojSr. Paul: T6omas H. Hueg Cin' ajSunfrsh L�ke: Gleoda Spbtle Ddto Air Unes lnc.: c.�„�y co�n�og DN�.ar,w�:: srlaa simoavon Federal Erprcss: Den DeBord Federa( Aviotion Adminisrrution: Bruce Wagoaer cmay cr��o� ,�,�c smp:. Dlck Ketnz MBAA: Etobert P. Jo6rsson �Nesaba Nor7hwest Airlink: P6ii Burke Metmpalitan Airports Commissiat: Commissbner Altoo Ge�per MN Air Nmional Gua/d �tajor Roy J. ShetJca Northwesr Airliner Vtark Selmen Jennifer Sayre Steve Hoime Nancy S[oudt S�. Pewl Chnmber nf Cnmmrrrr: RnU 5tiddlewo Sun Cnuntn•Airlines: c,�raoo c�.� D'nirrd Airlinrs lnc.: Kevin B�ack Unirrd Parerl Srn•ic•e: . �tike Gcyer U.S. Air Fnrcr Rrsen•e.• Captaln David J. Gerken Metropolitan Airports Comrnission Declaration of Purposes 1.) Promote public welfare and national security; serve public interest, convenience, and necessity; promote air navigation and transportation, international, national, state, and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, safe, and economical handling of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in national and international programs of air transportation; and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the metropolitan area in this state as an aviation center, and to correlate that area with all aviation facilities in the entire state so as to provide for the most economical and effective use of aeronautic facilities and services in that area; 2.) Assure the residents of the metropoiitan area of the minnnum environmental impact from air navigation and transportation, and to that end provide for noise abatement, conirol of airport area land use, and other protective measures; and 3.) Promote the overall goals of the state's environmental policies and minimize the public's exposure to noise and safety hazards azound airports. Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council Statement of Purpose This corporation was formed in furtherance of the general welfare of the communities adjoining Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport - Wold-Chamberlain Field, a public airport in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, through the alleviation of the problems created by the sound of aircraft using the airport; through study and evaluation on a continuing basis of the probiem and of suggestion for the alleviation of the same; through initiatian, coordination and promotion of reasonable and effective procedures, control and regulations, consistent with the safe operation of the airport and of aircraft using the same; and through dissemination of information to the affected communities, their affected residents, and the users of the airport respecting the problem of aircraft noise nuisance and in respect to suggestions made and actions initiated and taken to alleviate the problem. Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council Representation The membership shall include representatives appointed by agencies, corporations, associadons and governmental bodies which by reason of their statutory authority and responsibility or control over the airport, or by reason of their status as airport users, have a direct interest in the operation of the airport. Such members will be called User Representatives and Public Representatives, provided that the User Representatives and Public Representatives shall at all times be equal in number. The Airport 24-hour Noise Hotline is 726-94I /. Complaints to the hotline do not result in changes in Airport activitv, but provide a public sounding board and airport information oudet. The hodine is staffed during business hours, Monday - Friday. This report is prepazed and printed in house ' Chad Leqve, ANQMS Coordinazor Shane VanderVoort, ANOMS Technician Questions or comments may be directed to: MAC - Aviation Noise Programs Minneapolis / 5t. Paul International Airport 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 TeL• (612) 725-6331. Fax: (612) 725-6310 AN3P Home Page: http://www.macavsat.or Metropolitan A.irports Commission Aviation Noise Programs ,� � C �: 1 C>perations and Complai�t .Sum�nary 1 Operations Summary - All Aircraft .....................................................................................1 MSP May Fleet Mix Percentage .......................................................................................... l AirportMay Complaint Summary .......................................................................................1 May Operations Summary - FAA Airport Traffic Record ..................................................1 lt2rinneapolis - 5t. I'aul .�nternatianal Airpo�t Complaint Sum�zary 2 ComplaintSummary by City ...............................................................................................2 Avaalable Tirrae for �Zunway %�se 3 TowerLog Reports - All Hours ...........................................................................................3 Tower Log Reports - Nighttime Hours ................................................................................3 �411 �perat�'ons 4 RunwayUse Report May 1998 ............................................................................................4 �Cl�'1Z�i' �8�' �jl Li'tdl'IODZS � RunwayUse Report May 1998 ............................................................................................5 1Vig�httinae � A.11 Opera.�'ons 6 Runway Use Report May 1998............ 1Vig�httime G'a�ier ,�et C�peralions Runway Use Report May 1998............ . t. , , �;.� ,; � � . � �, � 0 ...................................................................... 6 ..................................................................... � 14arcraft Iclenti aer ancl I.�escrip�ion Table 9 Runway �Ise - Day/.11�ight I'eriods - �411 Op�raizons �0 DaytimeHours ...................................................................................................................10 C'ornmuniiy Over, fiight �4nalysis 1 � j,..._. � Camer Jet Operations - All Hours ..................................................................................... l 1 Carrier Jet Operations - Ni�httime (10:30 pm - 6 am) ...................................................... l 1 Aviation Noise & Satellite ProQrams ' ) � Remote �1�'onitoring� ,�ite Locations 12 Carrier Jet �4rrival laela%d 1Voise Events 13 Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT .....................................................13 C'arrier ,Jet Departure IZelated 1Voise Events 14 Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ................................................14 Ten Loudest A.ircraft 1lToise Events Identi aed I S Ten Loudest Aircraft lijoise Evenis Identi, f iecl 16 Tera Loudest 14ircra, ft 1Voise �v�nts Identzfied 1� T'en Loudest �4ircra, ft l�oise Evenis Identifaed Ten Loudest A.ircra, fi Noise Events Identi,�ed Terc Loudest .A.ircraft 1�loise Events �dentified Flig�ht �'rack .�ase 11Pllap 21 . . � � �lirport Noise and Operations 141oraitoring� Systejn Flight �'racks 22 Carrier Jet Operations - May 1998 ....................................................................................22 �lirport 1Voise and Operaiion,� Monito'°ing S'ystern �light Tracks 23 Carrier Jet Operations - May 1998 ....................................................................................23 Air,port 1Voise and' Operations 1tlonato�~ing ►�yst`em �la�ht T'racks 24 Carrier Jet Operations - May 1998 ................................................................................... 24 A.irpori 1Voise and O�erations tl�lonito�°in,g System .F'laght Z'racks 25 Carrier Jet Operations - May 1998 ................................................................................... 25 .�4nalysis of �4arcraft l�oase �vents - Ali"Ci'Clft Ldn ��) A.nalys�s of Aircra, ft 1Voase Events - Ai�craft Ldn d�(A) Aviation Noise & Satelli[e Programs � �� ,. C Ivtetropolitan Airports Commission C.�peratio�s and Complaint Surnmary IVIay 1998 Operations Summary - All Aircraft Runway Arrival % Use Departure % Use 04 173 1.0%a 125 0.7% 22 117 0.6% 7269 41.4% 12 9521 53.0% 6111 34.8% 30 8I48 45.4% 4049 23. I°Io MSP May Fleet Mix Percentage Stage s�� Scheduleci �tONIS A.NOlVIS 1997 199� Count 1997 Count 199� Stage 2 42.0% 30.9% 44.8% 41.5%a Stage 3 58.0% 69.1% 55.2% 58.5% Airport NYay Complaint Summary Airport 199'7 1998 MSP 995 1490 Airlake 0 0 Anoka 2 9 Crystal 1 4 Flying Cloud 2 7 Lake Elmo 1 0 St. Paul 1 2 Misc. 1 1 TOTt�L 10�3 1513 May Operations Summary - FAA Airport 'Traffic Record Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page I �vietropo(itan Airports Commission 1Viinneapolis - Ste Paul Iniernati�nal Airpor� �o�nplaint Surnm�ry �ay 199s Complaint Summary by City Page 2 City Arrival Departure Total Percentage A le Valle 1 4 5 0.3% Arden Hills 3 1 4 0.3% Bloomin ton 11 213 224 15.2%a Burnsville 4 88 92 6.2% Ea an 28 109 137 9.3% Eden Prairie 2 7 9 0.6% Edina 0 2 2 0.1 °Io Falcon Hei hts 0 4 4 0.3°10 Inver Grove Hei hts 7 39 46 3.1% Ma le Grove 10 15 25 1.7% Ma lewood 1 0 1 0.1% Mendota Hei hts 6 107 113 7.7% Minnea olis 194 286 4$0 32.6°Io Minnetonka � 0 3 3 0.2% Oakdale 0 1 1 0.1% Prior Lake 0 6 6 0.4% Richfield 18 161 179 12.2% Roseville 0 2 2 0.1 % Sava e 7 6 13 0.9% St. Louis Park 4 1 5 0.3% St Paul 72 31 103 7.0% South St. Paul 0 4 4 0.3% Sunfish Lake 0 13 � 13 0.9°Io West St. Paul 0 2 2 0.1% Total 368 ll05 14�3 1�% Time of Day Nature of Complaint , Aviation Noise & Satellite Pro�ams C Available T'irr�e for IZunway LTse 'Tower Log Reports - lO�Iay 1998 All Hours 0% R ,, _ r . `._ .,-. 1 � ; . �,. i ; I � 69% 13% O°IO �% Nighttime Hours 0% 0% 20% ,r � `� - � rx ... ,; 35 % Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Metropolitan Airports Commission 51% 64% 67% 60% Pa?e 3 �te�ropolican Airpons Commission ' '� .1 ' • i ' • � • � � . � �: . F ', -� � Runwa A�� Count Percen e �� 199'7 1VIay 1997 y I)eparture � Count Percentage 04 A 173 1.0% 85 0.7% 12L A 5617 31.3% 1472 12.6% 12R A 3904 21.7% 1547 13.3% 22 A 117 0.6°Io 118 1.0% 30L A 3593 20.0% 4512 38.7% 30R A 4555 25.4% 3919 33.7% Total Arr.. 17959 100% 11653 100% 04 D 125 0.7% 83 0.7% 12L D 4861 27.7% 1485 13.1 % 12R D 1250 7.1 % 1746 15.4% 22 D 7269 41.4% � 613 5.4% 30L D 388 2.2% 3886 34.2% 30R D 3661 20.9% 3549 31.2% Total Dep. 17554 100% 11362 100% Note: ARTS data missing for 1.5 days. ; , Page 4 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs . �, Carrier Jei Operations I2unway Use �2eport l�l[ay 19 � 0.7 % 0.$% „ : v� 1.0% 44.2 0 �letropolitan Airports Commission 45.4% 33.9% Runwa A�� Count Percentag� �� 1� �ay 1997 Y �p�re Count Percentage 04. P, 124 1.0% 32 0.4% 12L A 4507 36.8% 984 13.2% 12R A 1962 16.0% 995 13.4% 22 A 95 0.8% 33 0.4% 30L A 1929 15.7% 2866 38.4% 30R A 3635 29.7% 2551 34.2% Tot�l Arr. 12252 100% 7461 100% .04. D 82 0.7% 10 0.2% 12L D 3636 30.2% 945 13.1 % 12R D 445 3.7% 1132 15.7% 22 D 5309 44.2% 421 5.8% 30L D 169 1.4% 2628 36.4% 30R D 2381 19.8% 2079 28.8% Total Dep. 12022 1(}0% 7215 100% Note: ARTS dara missing for 1.5 days. Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 5 Nletropolitan Airports Commission �', I�ighttime - Ail �perations Runway Use AZeport May 19 � 3.1 % 4.7% . '� 10.4% �� 3b.7 0 % 37.6% Run�ay ArrivaU Count Percentage l�Yay 1997 May 1997 Departure Count Percentage 04 A 100 10.4% 22 4.7% 12L A 225 23.3% 5 l.l% 12R A 54 5.6% 29 6.3% 22 A 45 4.7% 15 3.2% 30L A 174 18.1% 341 73.7% 30R A 365 37.9% 51 11.0% Total Arr. 9b3 100% 4b3 100% 04 D 43 3.1% 9 3.8%. 12L D 376 27.5% 15 6.4% 12R D 139 10.1% 97 41.3% 22 D 503 36.7% 57 24.3% 30L D 41 3.0% 55 23.4% 30R D 268 - 19.6% 2 0.8% Total Dep. 13i0 100% 235 100% Note: ARTS data missing for !.5 days. Page 6 Aviation Noise & Satel(ite Programs �' �letropolitan �irports Commission Nighttime Carrier Jet Operations Runway Use iZeport May 19 S 2.7 % I�unway ArrivaU Count Percentage 1Via� 1997 1VIay 1997 �p�re Count Percentage 04 A 80 10.5% 15 4.9% 12L A 184 24.1 % 3 1.0% 12R A 34 4.4% 19 6.2% 22 A 42 5.5% 3 1.0% 30L A 96 12.6% 225 73.5% 30R A 328 42.9% 41 13.4% Total Ax�: 764 100% 306 100% 04 D 24 2.7% 0 0.0% 12L D 283 32.3% 8 7.0% 12R D 3.6 4.1% 43 37.7% 22 D 332 37.9% 44 38.6% 30L D 17 1.9% 17 14.9% 30R D 185 21.1 % 2 1.8% Total �Dep. 877 100% 114 100% Note: ARTS data missing for 1.5 days. Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Paje 7 �tztropolitan ,airports Commission � . . , �. ;. � � � ;� ,. �,�• ', � Aircraft Type Count Percentage B777 0 0.0%. B727H 246 1.0% B73B 802 3.3% B74A 116 0.5% B74B 62 0.3% B757 2554 10.5% B767 66 0.3% BA46 1013 4:2% CARJ 214 0.9% FA 10 0 0.0% DC 10 699 2.9°Io DC8 2 0.0% DC9H 3106 12.8% E 145 198 0.8% A300 70 0.3% A310 29 0.1% A319 1 0.0% A320 2632 10.8% F I00 980 4.0% L101 0 0.0% MD 11 2 0.0% MD80 1265 5.2% H25B 115 0.5% H25C 25 0.1% BA11 0 0.0% B727 2218 9.1% B73A 1633 6.7% DC$ 157 0.7% DC9 6069 25.0% F28 0 _ 0.0% Total 24274 1(}0% Note: ARTS data missing for 1.5 days. Page 8 ' Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs i . ' . / • ' i ' ' . I; I ' /� �- , �.: i�tetropolitan Airports Commission Aircraft Identifier anci Descrip�io��'able Identifier Aircraft Description 8727 BOEING 727 B727H BOEING 727 - HUSH KIT B73B BOEING 737 - 300/400/500 B73A BOEING 737 100/200 B74A BOEING 747 - 100/200/300 B74B BOEING 747 - 400 B757 BOEING 757 B767 BOEING 767 B'7�7 BOEING 777 � H25C BRITISH AEROSPACE 125 - 1000 H25B BRITISH AEROSPACE 125 - 700/800 BA11 BRITISH AEROSPACE 111 BA46 BRTTISH AEROSPACE 146 CARJ CANADAIK 650 FA 10 FALCON I O DC 10 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC 10 DC8 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC8, DC8 70 - SERIES RE (ALL SERIES) DC9 MCDONNI:LL DOUGLAS DC9 DC9H MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 HUSH KIT E145 EMBR.AER 145 A300 AIItBUS INDUSTRIES A300 A310 AIRBUS IlVDUSTRIES A310 A319 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A319 A320 AIRBUS INDUSTRIES A320 F100 FOKKER 100 F27 FOKKER F27 (PROP) � F28 FOKKER F28 L 101 LOCKHEED TRISTAR L1011 MD 11 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC 11 MD$0 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 80-SERIES S W3 S WEARINGEN METROLINER 3 SW4 SWEARINGEN METROLINER 4 SF34 SAAB 340 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 9 �te�ropolitan ?�irport� Commission i�un�vay LT�e - Liay/1V�ight Periocis - Ail iJperations Minneapoi�s - St. Paul International Airport May 1998 Daytime Hours Runway Departures Percentage Arrivals Percentage Totai Day Name Day Use Day Use 04 82 0.5% 73 0.4°Io 155 12L 4485 27.7% 5392 31.7% 9877 12R 1111 6.9% 3850 22.7% 4961 22 6766 41.8% 72 0.4% 6838 30L 347 2.1% 3419 20.1% 3766 30R 3393 21.0% 4190 24.7% 7583 Total 16184 1�% 16996 100% 33180 Nighttime Hours Runway Departures Percentage Arrivals Percentage Total Naght Name Night Use Night Use 04 43 3.1% 100 10.4% 143 12L 376 27S% 225 23.3% 601 12R 139 10.1% 54 5.6% 193 22 503 36.7% 45 4.7% 548 30L 41 3.0% 174 18.1% _. 215 30R 268 19.6% 365 37.9% 633 Total 1370 100% 963 100% 2333 Note: ARTS data missing for !.5 days. Page IO Aviation Noise & Satellite Prob ams �tetropoli[an �,irports Commission Cornmunity O�erflight A.nalysis 1Vlinneapolis - St. Paul International Airport May 199� Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours Number Number Total Percent Number of Overflight Area �� P�� Carrier Jet Carrier Jet Operations Operations Operations per 24 I3ours Over So. Minneapolis/ 6469 2550 9019 37.2°Io 305.7 No. Richfield Over So. Richfieldl 124 5309 5433 22.4% 184.2 Bloomington Over St. Paul - 95 82 177 0.7°Io 6.0 Highland Park Over Eagan/ 5564 4081 9645 39.7% 327.0 Mendota Heights Total 24274 100% 822.9 Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (10:30pm - 6 am) Number Number. �'otal Percent l�tumber of (� Over�ight Area �� p�� Caa�rier Jet Carrier Jet Operations Operations Operations per 24 Hours Over So. Minneapolis/ 218 202 420 25.6% 13.8 No. Richfield Over So. Richfield/ 80 332 412 25.1% 13.5 Bloomington � Over St. Paul - 42 24 66 4.0% 2.2 Highland Park Over Eagan/ 424 319 743 45.3% 24.4 Mendota Heights Total 1641 1�% 53.9 Note: ARTS dara missing for 1.5 days. Aviation Noise & Satellite Prob ams Page 11 Mecropolitan Airpons Commission Remote 1Vlonitoring Site I..ocation� Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Page 12 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs �tetropolitan Airport� Commission Carrier Jet Arrival Related I�toise �vents �ay 199� Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT �T City Appro�mate Street Location Events Events Events Events ID >bSdB >8dDdB >94dB >100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 4145 57 1 0 2 Minneapo(is Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 4071 735 5 0 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmont Avenue 2136 856 83 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 4284 1526 7 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 2474 1329 66 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Street 4907 3960 1252 4 7 Richfield Wentworth Avenue & 64th Street 6 0 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 18 2 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 99 57 3 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 105 90 20 0 11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 21 5 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton Sueet & Rockwood Avenue 17 6 1 0 � 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 41 3 1 0 14 Eagan First Sireet & McKee Street 3975 59 1 0 IS Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Le�cington Avenue 146 11 2 0 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue & V'ilas Lane 2009 930 10 0 17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 131 63 0 0 18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 136 42 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 14 1 0 0 20 Richfield 75th Street & 3rd Avenue 8 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 193 2 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1434 6 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 1169 11 1 0 24 Eagan Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 3579 61 0 0 Note: ARTS data missing for 1.5 days. Aviation Noise & Sate(lite Programs Paoe 13 Metropolitan Airports Commission . . . �; . � � . r . � . �, �; . . , ��; Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each R1VIT (, RMT Events Events Events Events ID City Approximate Street Location �� B ��B �100dB 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 590 192 6 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 606 278 22 0 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmont Avenue 675 410 49 0 4 Minneapo(is Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 1192 614 90 1 � 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 1624 464 53 6 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Street 2169 1897 1067 259 7 Richfleld Wentworth Avenue & 64th Street 302 110 5 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 1121 446 64 3 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 58 35 11 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 82 68 49 8 11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 81 41 11 1 12 St. Paul Alton Street & Rockwood Avenue 17 6 1 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 2402 535 25 0 14 Eagan First Street & McKee Street 1703 677 93 8 15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Lexington Avenue 2711 679 38 0 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue &�las Lane 1180 432 61 5 17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 3249 1467 332 25 18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 4803 4387 2688 418 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 4667 2944 1136 62 20 Richfieid 75th Street & 3rd Avenue 572 144 16 2 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 1205 305 1 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 753 113 1 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 3396 1986 711 44 24 Eagan Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 1352 392 6 0 Note: ARTS data missing for 1.5 days. i" � Page l4 Aviation Noise & Satellite Pro�ams Metropolitan Airports Commission Ten Loudest Aircraft l�oise Events Iden�ified RMT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. Minneapolis Date Time Ty� �ax � Level 98/OS/0121:44:43 DC9 98.7 A 98/OS/0211:53:15 B727 91.9 D 98/OS/0311:59:06 B727 91.3 D 98/OS/2511:55:05 B727 90.5 D 98/OS/2517:02:35 B727 90.5 D 98/OS/0211:37:39 B727 90.3 D 98/OS/0317:04:42 B727 90.2 D 98/OS/0122:33:06 B727 89.9 D 98/OS/04 21:07:28 B727 89.5 D 98J05/12 20:11:57 B727 89.1 D RMT #3: W. Elmwood S� & Belmont Ave. Minneapolis Date Ti� A/� Msa � Type Level 9$/OS/24 09:27:34 DC9 99.9 D 98/OS/2413:58:41 DC9 99.6 D 98/OS/0714:05:49 DC9 98.7 D 98/OS/1219:19:33 B727 98.6 D 98/OS/20 21:38:36 B727 98.6 ' D.- 98/OS/07 22:52:50 B727 98.5 D 98/OS/0716:05:52 DC9 98.0 A 98/OS/3012:20:12 DC9 97.6 A 98/OS/2614:54:56 B727 97.3 A 98/OS/2419:30:09 DC9 97.0 A RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd S� Nlinneapolis Date 'ISme �e l�iax � Level 98/OS/3100:17:17 B727 98.8 D 98/05/2517:02:20 B727 97.1 D 98/OS/1812:11:41 B727 95.0 D 98/05/0211:37:17 B727 93.5 D 98/OS/12 20:1 I:34 B727 93.3 D 98/OS/0117:1229 B727 93.1 D 98/OS/0317:04:20 B727 92.9 D 98/OS/2511:54:44 B727 92.5 D 98/05/2610:52:22 B727 92.3 D 98/OS/0311:58:46 B727 91.8 D RMT #4: Oakiand Ave. & 49th St. Minneapolis A/C l�z �� Type Level � 98/OS/1911:55:29 B727 101.2 D 98/OS/20 09:47:45 DC9 99.7 D 98/OS/25 21:12:53 DC9 99.5 D 98/OS/25I7:01:58 B727 98.7 D 98lOS/0121:02:21 B727 98.5 D 98/OS/0519:37:33 B72� 98.3 D 98/OS/0514:24:08 B72� 98.2 D 98/OS/1812:11:15 B727 98.0 D 98/OS/29 09:25:49 B727 97.6 D 98/OS/0218:43:06 B727 96.7 D Note: ARTS data missing for l.S days. '� Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 1 � �ietropolitan :'.irpurts Commission i � � � r . , ; . 1 ' ' 1 ' ' / ' RNIT #5: 12th Ave. & 58th St. Minneapolis Date Time Ty� M� A/D Level 98/OS/0719:34:10 B72? 104.1 D 98/OS/2816:19:49 B727 102.6 D 98/OS/03 09:40:26 B727 102.5 D 98/OS/07 22:55:27 B727 102.4 D 98/OS/31 '10:28:50 B727 102.3 D 98/OS/20 t9:36:11 B727 100.8 D 98/OS/0719:37:52 B73A 99.9 D 98/OS/1216:31:04 B727 99.8 D 98/OS/0719:20:43 DC9 99.6 D 98/OS/07 23:28:02 B727 98.9 D RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th S� Richfield Date Time �� I.Mev�el � AID 98/OS/0719:34:30 B727 95.5 D 98/OS/2816:20:10 B727 94.7 D 98/OSI07 20:03:55 B'727 94.4 D 9$/OS/3110:29:08 B727 94.4 D 98/OS/3114:05:35 B727 91.7 D 98/OS/03 09:40:49 B727 90.0 D 98/OS/19 09:09:02 DC8 89.8 D 98/OS/07 22:05:43 B73A 89.7 D � 98/OS/29 21:41:27 B727 89.7 D 98/OS/OS 09:31:04 DC9 89.3 D R1�IT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th S� Nlinneapolis Date �me �C �� A/D Type Level 98/OS/2813:38:38 B727 109.8 D 98/05/0313:18:22 B727 108.9 D 98/OS/2913:39:53 B727 108.8 D 98/OS/25 21:13:02 B727 108.7 D 98/OS/13 07:36:45 DC9 108.6 D 98/OS/1812:10:44 B727 108.4 D 98/OS/0213:2�:27 B727 108.4 D 98/OS/25 21:26:26 B727 108.1 D 98/OS/2814:01:00 B72� 108.0 D 98/OS/1918:46:19 B727 108.0 D RMT #S: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. Minneapolis Date Time A/C Mag � T�ype Level 98/OS/19 09:25:57 B727 100.5 D 98/OS/2513:19:46 B727 100.5 D 98/OS/2613:42:33 B727 100.2 D 98/05/29 21:28:02 B727 99.4 D 98/OS/2913:22:52 B727 98.8 D 98/OS/0213:28:01 B727 98.6 D 98/OS/20 22:45:23 B727 98.6 D 98/OS/29 07:07:45 B727 98.3 D 98/OS/2513:31:34 B727 98.1 D 98/OS/0106:15:43 B727 97.9 D Note: ARTS data missing for I.S days. Paje l6 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � �t�tropoliwn Airports Commission Ten L,oudest A�rcraft l�toise Events Ider�tified RMT #9: Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. S� Paul Date Time �C Max � Type Level 98/OS/2115:39:48 B74A 98.4 D 98/OS/0915:10:23 B74A 97.1 D 98/OS/2315:26:10 B74A 95.5 D 98/OS/0713:14:21 B74B 94.9 D 98/OS/28 00:05:51 DC9 94.9 A 98/05/07 15:42:45 B74A 94.6 � D 98/OS/0912:33:01 B74A 94.2 D 98/OS/2015:09:36 B�4A 93.6 D 98/05/29 19:18:05 DC 10 92.1 D 98/05/23 19:12:39 DC 10 91.7 D RMT #11: Finn S� & Sch�ffer Ave. S� Paul Date Time A/C � _� A/D 'I�p�� : Levet �. . 98/OS/0814:04:08 B74A 101.1 D 98/OS/22 05:40:35 B727 98.7 D 98/OS/2916:19:44 B74A 97.8 D 98/OS/0315:36:13 B74A 9'7.2 D 98/OS/0915:33:58 B74A 95.7 D 98/OS/2105:14:03 B727 93.7 D 98/OS/22 00:34:59 DC9 93.6 D 98/OS/3018:02:33 B74A 93.4 D 98/OS/07 10:11:33 DC 10 91.9 D 98/OS/07 22:20:03 DC8 91.7 D RMT #10: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. St. Paul Date 'l�me A/C Mag � . Type Level 98/05/0815:07:42 B74A 103.8 D 98/OS/0915:09:55 B74A 102.5 D 98/OS/3018:02:19 B74A 102.5 D 98/05/2315:25:44 B74A 102.2 D 98/OS/2013:08:24 B74A 101.5 D 98/OS/0715:42:17 B74A 101.3 D 98/OS/0912:32:35 B74A 100.8 D 98/OS/2015:09:09 B74A 100.1 D 98J05/0913:18':58 B74B 99.9 D 98/OS/2115:39:21 B74A 99.8 D RMT #12: Alton St & 12ockwood Ave. St. Paul �. _ Date T'lme AiC Mag � • Type Level 98/05/2217:44:11 DC9 94.6 D 98/OS/25 15:13:10 B'727 90.3 A 98/OS/2017:08:09 B727 89.9 A 98/OS/1215:12:30 B73A 86.2 A 98/OS/22 00:57:40 B737 85.0 D 98/05/2715:21:45 DC9 85.0 A 98/OS/0912:12:16 B727 82.5 A 98/OS/08 09:49:03 MD80 82.1 A 98/OS/23 00:48:57 B72� 82.1 D 98I05/2213:58:21 DC9 81.3 D Nore: ARTS data missing for 1.5 days. Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Pa;e 17 �tetropolitan �irports Commission 'I'e� I..oudest Aircraft I�loise Events Identified RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th S� Inver Grove Heights Date Time ,�� M� � Level 98/05/18 23:47:36 B72'7 92.1 D 98/OS/03 22:38:02 B72� 90.0 D 98/OS/2213:29:12 B727 89.9 D 98/05/0613:44:08 B727 89.8 D 98/OS/1213:18:23 B727 88.5 D 98/OS/2122:36:10 B727 88.5 D 98/OS/14 23:30:59 B727 88.0 D 98/OS/2415:25:18 B727 87.8 D 9$/OS/25 07:26:12 B727 87.7 D 98/OS/22 07:19:06 B727 87.3 D RMT #22: Anne Marie Trail Inver Grove Heights Date Time � M� A/D Level 98/OS/ 12 07:31:16 B727 90.6 D 98/OS/22 23:16:36 B727 89.9 D 98/OS/0813:39:38 B727 $8.6 D 98/OS/2217:36:58 B727 88.4 D 98/05/09 22:58:28 B72'1 88.2 D 98/OS/09 t4:12:02 B727 86.6 D 98/OS/0817:11:28 B727 86.3 D 98/OS/22 22:54:21 B727 86.0 D 98/OS/22 09:34:22 B727 85.9 D 98/OS/0715:54:42 B727 85.8 D : i� RMT #23: End of I�enndon Ave. Mendota Heights A/C Max Date Tia� �� Leael A/D 98/OS/04 09:09:21 B727 106.7 D 98/05/2212:10:37 B727 103.7 D 98/OS/12 09:31:55 B727 103.7 D 98/OS/14 07:55:31 DC9 103.5 -- D 98/05/3012:11:17 B727 103.5 D 98/OS/23 07:51:52 B727 103.3 D 98/05/1412:33:31 B727 103.0 D 98/OS/3013:26:16 B727 102.9 D 98/05/26 22:06:26 B727 102.7 D 98/OS/25 07:44:41 B727 102.1 D RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Eagan Date ZSmc ,�� M� A/D I�evel 98/OS/0715:54:14 B727 95.9 D 98/OS/1016:35:20 B727 93.9 D 98/OS/2114:42:26 B727 91.5 D 98/OS/0816:18:55 B727 91.2 D 98/OS/0813:20:28 B73A 90.9 D 98/OS/2217:36:28 B727 90.7 D 98/OS/13 00:50:10 B727 90.0 D 98/OS/06 23:11:15 B727 89.9 D 98/OS/0913:52:14 $727 89.8 D 98/OS/3100:49:25 B727 89.7 D ' Note: ARTS datu missing for /.S davs. Page ?0 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs �te[ropolican AirpoRs Commission Flight Track �a�e I1�Iap Airport Noise and Operations 1Vlonitoring System Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page Z 1 tiietropolitan Airport� Commi,sion �:,�, '1' / i..i, 1',; � 11 ,; • �'• • , � ,. � ,. .� �� r: ' . � . ' i� 11t . • . �, � � . . �r �, . � � i � � � . � ( 1 . 1' 1 i' '/ i i i. Page 2 Aviation Noise & Satellite �'roa ams � ;- r j �iztropoli[:in �irpurt, Commission I�Iin�eapolis - �t. Paul Internatlonai A►.irport M�y 199s 40�1 ... Total 12L and 12R Carrier Jet Departures 157 sse Carrier Jei Departures (3.9 % 1Vorth �f Proposeci 095° (1VI) Corridor Policy �oundary �_ �� 57 iRaC�S CROSSED ?-Ga�� LEFT COUNT=4 (2.5�) RIGHT CO�NT=153 (9�.5�) �s -4� DEUTATION FR�� CE�V i ER 0= GATE (ft ' ,. Aviation Noise & Satellite Pro�ams Page 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission IVlinneapolis - �te Pa�al International A,irport . May 199s � �; �= 408�' ... Total 12L and 12R Carrier Je� I)epariures l0 ... �arrier Jei I)eparture - Early �'urnout (0.2% (l�orih Side �efore Three Ii��iles) 10 � �AC�S CRO�SE� P-G�1TE LEFT COUiV I=4 (40.Q%) RIGH i COUNT=o (60.0%) �.r D�VIRTION F��M CEV i ER G� GnIE (fl) Page 4 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs 1� , ( �tztropolir:in Airports Commission �outhern �oundary �orridor Ga�e Penetration Analysis Niinneapolis - �t. Paul� International A.irport IVIay �.99� 0.�% (34) C�rrier Jet Departures South of Corridor (�outh of 30L Localizer) �viation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 5 �l�tropolitan Airports Commissian . Ii�Iinneapolis - St. Paul International Airport . ; ��y i99s � �� _ � �.-� o _._. o . �. � 4081 ... Totai 12L and 12I� Carrier Jet Departures 25 ... Carrier Jet Departures (0.6% South of Corridor (South oi 30L Localizer) 2� T�AC'�� CROSSED P-G,4TE �EFT COUNT=22 (88.0%) RIGHT COUNT=3 (12.0�) �� DEVIATION FROU CE�VIER OF G�TE (f►.) Page 6 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs �� = ;�le[ropolitan Airports Commission 1Vlinneapolis - S�. P°aul Internat�onal r�irport IVIay 199� 4081 ... Total 12L ar�d 121Z Car�ier Jet Departures 9... Carrier Jet I�epartures - Early 'I`dirnout (0.2% (�ouih Side �efore Three 1Vliles) 9 TRAC�� CROSSED P-GAiE LEFT COUNT=4 (44.4%) RIGHT COl1iVT=5 (�5.0%) DEVIATION FR0�1 CE,UjER OF GATE (ff) � ' Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Pa?e 7 �t�[ropolitan Airports Commission Southerr� �oundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis . �- 'nneapolis - Ste Paul Internaiio�al r�irport May 199� C 0.4% (18) Carrier Jet �epartures 5° South of Corridor (5° South of 30L Localizer) Page 8 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � �� tetro��litan Airports Commission I�Iinneapolis - �t. Paul International Airpori IVIay 199� 4081 ... Total 12L �ndl 12R Carrier� Jet I)epartures 9... Carrier Jet I)epartures 0.2 % �° South oi ICorridor (5° �outh oi 30L Loca�izer) 9 TRACK� CROSSED P-GA�c �EFT COUNT=7 (77.8�) RIGHT COUNT=2 {22.2�) � D�UTATIOi� FRO,U CENTER 0� G�Tt (�f) 11 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 9 yletropo(i�an Airports Commission Il�Iinneap�lis - �t. Paul Internatior�al Airport �, May.1998 � � �= 4081 ... Total 12L and 12R �arrier Jet I)epartures 9... Carrier Jei I)epartures - Early �I`urnout (0.2 % (South Side �efore Three IViiles) 9 TRACKS CROSSED P-GaTE LEFT COUN1=4 (44.4�) RIGHT COl1NT=5 (55.6%) DEVIATION FRO�� CENTER OF GaTE (ft� Page 10 , Aviation Noise & Satellite Frograms � � �' r ;. � � ; _ 1: _ Top 10 Aircraft Generated I�Tolse �vents at Each l�emote �Ionito�ing 'Tower C c;. � �tetropoliran ,-�irports Commission Ten Loudest A,ircraft I�oise Events Identified RNIT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st St. Minneapolis Date Tin� ,�� M� A/n Level OS/18/9712:�4:3� B727 94.1 D OS/07/9713:04:17 B727 90.1 A OS/14/9712:43:08 DC9 89.8 D OS/07/9717:52:59 B727 89.3 A � OS/11/9711:47:02 B727 893 D O5/11/9719:38:42 B727 88.3 D OS/03/9711:34:10 DC9 87.9 D OS/11197 20:19:48 B727 87.9 D OS/14/9719:09:37 B727 87.6 D OS/17/9712:38:34 B747 87.5 D RMT #3: W. Elmwood S� & Belmont Ave. Minneapolis Date Tiu�e �C . Maz - � T�pe Level OS/18/9712:53:58 B727 993 D OS/06/9712:11:47 B727 96.4 D OS/06/9719:38:24 B727 96.1 D OS/20/97 8:20:20 DC9 95.8 D OS/20/9714:5�:51 DC9 95.4 A OS/ 18/97 17:22:41 B727 94.7 D OS/20/9711:34:40 DC9 94.6 D OS/ 17/97 l 1:31:24 DC9 93.7 D OS/ 18/97 16:08:51 B747 93.1 D 05/18/97 20:3Z:28 8727 93.1 D R.ttiIT #?: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St l�linneapolis Date Time �C Max � 'I�pe Level OS/08/97 =�:49:36 B747 94.9 D OS/07/9715:12:06 B727 94.3 A 05/18/9716:09:23 B747 94.3 D 0�/18/9712:54:32 B727 92.8 D OS/14/9� 19:09:34 B727 91.5 D 0�/07/9712:1337 B747 90.9 A 05/0719715:02:12 B727 90.8 A 05/11/9716:15:42 B727 90.� D 05/14/9716:48:19 DC9 90.1 D OS/03/9716:40:57 B727 90.0 D RMT #4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St. Minneapolis A/C Mag �� e Tppe Le�el � OS/19/9711:56:33 B727 100.2 D OS/18/9717:28:04 B727 99.4 D OS/14/9719:08:52 B727 99.1 D OS/0$/9711:31:13 SW3 98.9 D OS/1419711:21:39 B727 98.9 D OS/01/9711:21:58 B727 98.2 D 0�/OS/97 20:28:17 B727 97.8 D OS/03/97 21:05:08 B727 97.5 D 05/18/9718:37:00 B727 97.3 D OS/lS/97 (6:�}8:24 B7?7 97.2 D Note: r1RTS data missing for 12.5 days Aviation �loise & Satellite ProQrams �ietropo(itan .-�irports Commission 'Ten L�oudest r�ircraft I�oise Events Identified R.NIT #5: 12th Ave. & SSth St. i�linneapolis Date Ti� � Max � Level OS/16/97 11:5�:12 B727 105.7 D OS/15/97 8:�2:�6 B727 105.4 D OS/ 17/97 11:31:05 DC9 104.6 D OS/01/9718:55:17 DC9 104.5 D OS/OS/9711:37:24 B727 104.1 D OS/08/9713:14:47 B727 104.1 D OS/O i/97 11:34:42 DC9 103.5 D OS/17/97 12:18:52 B727 103.3 D 05/17/9713:21:Q9 DC9 103.1 D 05/17/97 9:31:24 B727 102.7 D RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th St Richfield Date Time �� Mas � Level OS/14/97 7:15:02 B727 102.0 D OS/14/97 938:54 B727 101.1 D OS/11/9716:27:28 B727 99.9 D OS/ 16/97 18:36:21 B72� 99.7 D OS/19/97 7:55:34 B727 99.7 D OS/19/97 9:37:�3 DC9 99.6 D OS/ 14/97 17:20:10 B727 - 993 D OSI16/9715:00:51 B727 99.2 D OS/14/97 16:25:19 B727 99.0 D OS/14/9716:15:32 B727 98.9 D RI�IT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th S� Nlinneapolis Date T'ime �C Max � Type Level OS/18/9716:48:00 B727 108.6 D OS/06/9718:28:48 B727 107.8 D 05/08L97 17:10:45 B727 107.5 D OS/15/97 9:30:43 B727 107.5 D 05/08/9711:30:49 B727 107.4 D 05/I3/9712:10:59 B727 107.4 D 05/14/97 11:21:10 B'727 107.1 D OS/16/9711:57:�0 B737 106.9 D 05/06/9719:37:48 B727 106.� D OSI17/97 9:24:49 B727 106.7 D RMT #8: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. Minneapolis A/C Max Date lime �,pe Level A/D OS/16/97 7:27:40 DC9 97.4 D OS/11/9711:32:06 DC9 96.0 D 05/ 13/97 4:07:42 DC9 94.2 A 05/14/97 16:17:18 B737 93.9 D OS/16/9716:19:08 B727 93.5 D OS/11/97 9:39:37 DC9 93.2 D OS/OS/97 9:2'1:35 B727 93. i D OS/ 14/97 6:27:14 DC9 93.0 D OS/ 14/97 9:17:54 DC9 93.0 D OSI13/9711:21:01 DC9 91.9 D Note: ARTS data missing for l2.5 days Aviation Noise & Satellite Proa ams � �tetropo(iran ,�irpons Commission Ten Loudest Aircraft 1�loise Events Identified RMT #9: Saratoga St. & Hartford Ave. St Paul Date 'T'ime Tr� Max � Level OS/03/9712:10:17 B747 97.9 D OS/17/9716:20:04 B747 97.0 D OS/ 16/97 22:06:28 DC 10 91.4 D OS/03/97 15:12:14 B 747 91.2 D 05/17/9712:24:37 B737 88.5 D 05/17/97 23:43:13 B727 88.3 A OS/ 16/97 19:08:02 DC 10 88.1 D OS/ 16/97 11:09:18 DC9 8b.7 A OS/17/9712:38:59 B747 86.7 D OS/17/97 21:42:40 B727 85.9 A RMT #11: Finn S� & Scheffer Ave. St� Paul Date Time �� Max � Level OS/15/97 8:11:34 B737 89.2 D OS/16/9716:05:58 B747 88.1 D 05/02/97 5:49:20 DC9 86.3 D OS/07/97 9:14:04 DC9 85.4 D 05/07/9710:06:12 DC9 84.7 A OS/18/97 19:18:24 DC 10 84.7 D OS/20/9710:29:23 MD80 84.2 A OS/13/97 7:� 1:13 DC9 83.7 D OS/03/9712:10:07 B747 83.6 D 05/ 1 S/97 11:23:28 CL6� 83.1 D Ri'VIT #10: Itasca Ave. $c Bowdoin St. S� Paul Date 'I5me �C Max � 'I`ype Level OS/17/9712:38:34 B747 102.8 D OS/17/9716:19:39 B747 102.0 D OS/03/9712:09:�3 B747 101.3 D OS/03/9715:11:46 B747 100.9 D OS/16/9716:0538 B747 100.5 D OS/17/97 21:43:21 B727 95.7 A OS/16/97 19:07:36 DC 10 94.1 D OS/18I9719:18:08 DC10 93.0 D 05/ 16/97 22:06:05 DC 10 92.2 D OS/21/9713:00:03 B727 90.� A RMT #12; Alton S� & Rockwood Ave. St. Paul Date TSme �e Max A/D I,evel OS/20/97 7:53:19 SW3 98.4 D OS/06/97 20:52:11 BE02 88.6 D OS/15/97 7:47:40 B757 86.1 D OS/13/9713:44:08 B737 85.8 D O5/05/9711:47:30 DC9 84.9 D OS/0719716:18:5� B757 84.8 A OS/ 10/97 13:15:29 DC9 84.8 D OS/17/97 6:10:14 B727 84.6 A OS/21/97 7:30:36 BE80 84.4 D OS/17/976:53:41 B737 84.3 D Note: �RTS data missing for 12.5 days Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs �tecropolican ,-�irports Commission 'I'en Loudesi Aircrafi l�oise Events Identified R.I�IT #13: Southeast End of 1�Iohican Court iVlendota Heights Date Time Ty� Max � Level OS/I8/9712:19:56 B727 96.0 D OS/02/97 6:09:05 B727 89.$ D OS/16/97 9:50:31 B727 $9.7 D OS/18/97 9:38:09 DC9 89S D . OS/16/97 9:47:10 B727 88.6 D OS/21/9711:25:56 DC9 88.6 D OS/07/9717:15:05 SF34 88.0 D OS/02/9716:14:35 B727 87.3 D OS/07/97 22:16:47 B727 87.2 D OS/21/971730:11 B727 86.6 D RMT #15: Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. Mendota Heights Date Ti� �� Mag � Level OS/16/97 9:50:11 B727 99.7 D OS/16/97 9:46:23 B727 97.7 D OS/07/97 6:34:04 DC9 91.1 D OS/07/9715:19:57 B73� 96.9 D OS/ 16/97 9:26:29 DC9 96.9 D QS/OS/9� 6:09:15 DC9 96. t A OS/08/9710:32:40 DC9 94.9 A OS/08/9713:02:26 DC9 93.9 D OS/08/9710:46:13 DC9 93.6 A 05/07I9715:09:14 B757 93.3 D I2NIT #14: lst St. & McKee St. Eagan A/C Ma� Date 15me �e Level � OS/02/9716:16:21 B727 101.2 D OS/02/97 15:10:43 B727 100.4 D OS/17/97 20:25:17 B727 99.4 D 05/02/9715:34:05 B747 99.1 D 05/21/97 9:40:01 B727 98.7 D ' OS/!0/9716:59:16 B727 98.6 D OS/02/97 17:16:18 B727 98.1 D OS/17/9� 14:53:17 B727 97.4 D 05/17/9717:25:40 B727 97.4 D OS/17/9717:33:53 B727 97.4 D RMT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vlas Lane Eagan A/C Max Date'ISme _ �e : -'Level � � - � OS/18/971�:05:11 DC9 103.0 D 05/11/97 8:01:54 DC9 102.5 D OS/i l/97 4:35:25 B727 101.9 D OS/11/97 8:00:42 DC9 101.8 D 05/08/9714:52:42 DC9 101.4 D 05/18/9717:01:00 DC9 101.3 D OSl08/97 21:06:26 B727 101.2 D OS/11/97 8:10:50 B727 101.0 D OS/18/9717:11:52 B737 100.4 D OS/18/9716:54:35 DC9 id0.3 D Note: ARTS data missing for l2.� days Aviation Noise & Satellite ProQrams � �tetropolitnn ,-�irpons Commission Ten i.oudest A.ircraft l�toise Events Identifie�d R�1�IT #17: 84th St, & �th Ave. Bloomington Date Time ,Ty� L� � OS/OS/9710:15:08 B727 101.2 D OS/11/97 7:08:23 B727 98.2 D O5/01/9719:32:49 DC9 97.2 D OS/15/97 4:57:16 B727 96.9 D O5/01/97 8:47:39 B727 96.8 D OS/18/97 22:53:05 B727 96.7 D OS/ 14/97 15:03:45 B747 96.5 D OS/01/9710:27:05 B727 95.6 D OS/03/97 4:59:07 B727 95.5 D OS/18/9716:16:56 B727 95.3 D RMT #19: 16th Ave. & 84th St Bloomington Date Time � �� OS/11/97 8:42:32 B727 99.7 D OS/ 18/97 23:17:56 DC9 99.6 D OS/08/97 8:59:37 B727 99.5 D OS/11/97 7:46:18 B727 98.6 D OS/17/97 6:55:45 B727 98.5 D OS/ 17/97 8:43:35 B727 98.4 D 05/19/97 9:10:24 DC9 98.1 D OS/04/9712:�7:11 B727 97.7 D OS/17/97 7:09:49 B727 97.7 D OS/19/97 6:20:30 B737 97.7 D RNIT #18: 75th S� & 17th Ave. Rich6eld Date Time ,�� M� A1D Leve! OS/17/97 8:50:28 B727 103.4 D OS/18/97 22:52:49 B727 102.1 D OS/17/97 8:43:22 B727 101.7 D OS/OS/9710:14:51 B727 101.3 D OS/10/9712:26:16 B747 101.3 D OS/ 10/9'7 t 8:21:45 B747 1 O l.2 D OS/11197 7:08:04 B727 100.7 D OS/01/9719:32:34 DC9 100.6 D OS/17/9712:42:03 DC9 l00.0 D OS/04/97 8:41:27 B727 99.4 D RMT #2�: 75#h St. & 3rd Ave. Richfield Date T9me � Max � Level OS/20/97 6:13:59 B727 96.6 D OS/17/9712:42:21 DC9 93.8 D OS/ 17/97 7:09:53 B727 90.8 D 05/17/9710:54:12 DC9 90.2 D OS/21/97 6:14:47 EA32 88.0 D OS/13/97 8:18:23 BA31 87.5 A OS/06/97 5:52:49 MD I 1 85.9 D OS! 17/97 7:3 I:45 DC 10 85.8 D OS/10/97 7:16:12 DC 10 85.5 D OS/i i/97 7:31:37 DC9 85.3 D Note: r1RTS data missing for 12.5 days Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs �fz[ropolitan Airport5 Commission �'en Loudest Aircraft I�oise Evenis Identified R1YIT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th S�. Inver Grove Heights Date Time � M� AJD Level OS/21/9717:28:15 B727 92.8 D OS/16/9717:11:13 B727 919 A OS/21/9717:30:52 B727 89.4 D OS/02/9717:25:12 B727 89.1 D 05/17/9715:10:50 B727 38.6 D OS/02/97 8:13:25 B727 88.2 D OS/10/9713:27:27 B727 88.1 D OS/02/97 9:45:49 B727 86.7 D OS/02/9712:21:39 DC9 86.1 D 05/ 17/97 I5:42:5 i DC9 85.9 D RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave. Mendota Heights Date Time ,�� M� � Level OS/18/9712:19:28 B727 103.4 D OS/21/97 20:52:4b DC9 103.0 D 05102/9716:14:02 B727 102.9 D OS/07/9711:38:40 DC9 t02.6 D OS/13/9711:25:16 DC9 IOL9 D OS/ 16/97 9:49:57 B727 ! 0 I.9 D OS/16/97 9:46:0 l B727 101.4 D 05/02/9717:29:43 B727 101.1 D OS/0�/9717:14:33 B727 101.1 D __ OS/17/9715:09:22 B737 100.9 D RNIT #22: Anne vtarie Trail Inver Grove Heights AJC M� Date 'lime �e Level � OS/1S/9710:21:17 B7?7 90.1 A OS/15/9710:21:27 B727 89.6 A OS/15/9"710:21:49 B'727 89.3 A OS/08/9717:34:20 DC9 88.9 A OS/21/97 7:35:39 B727 87.7 D OS/07/9712:17:55 B727 87.4 D OS/21/97 9:40:�8 EA32 87.4 D 05/21/9719:06:34 B727 87.2 D OS/16/97 8:41:49 B727 86.9 D OS/02/9717:17:25 B727 86.8 D RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Eagan Date TSme A/C Mag A/D Type Level � OS/14/9714:03:32 B737 96.2 A OS/ll/9717:12:49 DC9 95.5 A OS/14/9714:02:08 B727 95.5 A 05/08/9712:10:51 DC9 95.1 A 0�/08/9711:45:18 DC9 95.0 A OS/08/97 12:17: t6 DC9 95.0 A OS/08/9712:09:45 DC9 94.8 A 05/19/97 6:26:47 B737 94.7 A OSI01/97 6:50:54 BA31 9�.5 A OS/20/97 6:23:21 B727 93.4 D Note: r1RTS data missing for l2.5 days Avia�ion Noise & Sateliite Programs �. _ fP s�- , +'i: `,. Nighttlme C)perations 10:30 to 11:00 pm ;vtetropolit�in Airports Commission l�ighttime Carr�er Jet Oper�.iions Runway Use Report 1VIay 1998, 10:30 - 11:00 prn 1.0 %'o � � ,`., � i �, 4,� .,, . . . ... ..... . . .... :. . w . .._ u . � , . ,,: . . ,.. _ .. , ,. � ., . ,_. _... _ . ,., ,..,,.. :..,, ��. � ■, ' •.� �� •1 • •'. �i�i� � � '. . �;' • � � � ��, �� ' � : ,,, � � ■ • - . : � •-. . . x .:.. . ,.. -.. . � . � � i �� r�x�� , �� 4 ns� �� r t.;; _...,,>�..' r.d,t`�k�z.�-�� ..,.::. , _...�,. � ,�: �-•, ,..,_., , II,� .._ . ., ., . . _ , , �' �l�0�■ ''' �' ', . , . ; ,,, �� - ■ �� • ; .,, �'� � : ..,, .� .� -- , �, .� ��'1�� '��'� r� h $� . 1 � �� E U I��i�,F s .dU i �,r x �.:, a+�1-� ..`�.__.. .,.._�_..,.,�..� ._.�. ..s_... ,-_.�,. _x. Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs . PaSe � �tetropolitan Airports Commission l�ighiiime - All Operations �Iour Runway iTse Report May 1998, 10°30 - 0.7% 11 r . �. ,�.�, � � '' `'' - _,.� . �,. _._, w _.., .,.., .��._. ,.. r .., ._.,.,. _r.:,.....:.. .v� . ,., �m�,.w . � .i �� ' �. � �� '�� . � ' ��'�� ,,, "° � �l��'�� '. � ��Si'' �� •- � � � 11�''�� : � ��. �.,�. p .. .. .�� 'J� ��14;�Pt%'S4 Y(,.� rt�� " , I ■ . , � ..;..�' I��,� .. ,�/I.................. II�.,��•��/I, ��■�,�� t/ I�1■�� ' •.' , • � I ��■I�.�� ,I/ . ' • �� II� ...;::. . .. ...... .... .�, _»:�..�... : . �,..., .. . � .,,I I I �,4 r�� x,,�Fa. ,u.�r�F [., ■I � � � ( � � �. Page 1 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs .. - ._.._... .. .. . . ... _... ;., .......� "�. .� C C J.