08-12-1998 ARC MinutesCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
AUGUST 12, 1998
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held
on Wednesday, August 12, 1998 in the City Hall Large Conference Room, 1101
Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The following
members were present: Beaty, Roszak, Stein and May. Commissioners Leuman,
Fitzer and Des Roches were excused. Also present were City Administrator Kevin
Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Roszak moved approval of the July 8, 1998 minutes.
Commissioner May seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
The Commission discussed when they would present the Airport Plan of
Action to the City Council. It was determined that Chair Beaty would
present the Action Plan on Tuesday, August 18, 1998. Administrator
Batchelder suggested that the presentation consist of items the Airport
Relations Commission has completed over the past year and that they should
focus on future goals.
Commission Stein indicated that he would be present at the August 18
meeting.
Chair'S.fel"h-informed the Commission that a reporter from the Sun Current
had been in contact with him and that he believes that the reporter is aware
of the City's concerns regarding air noise. Administrator Batchelder stated
that he will be meeting with Lori Blake, Star Tribune Transportation Reporter,
to discuss the City's concerns regarding air noise. Chair Beaty stated that he
would like to be informed of when the meeting is scheduled.
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION - AUGUST 12, 1998 MINUTES
I
The Commission briefly reviewed the Airport Plan of Action.
Commissioner May moved to recommend that the City Council approve the
Airport Plan of Action.
Commissioner Roszak seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
DISCUSS MASAC REQUEST FOR
CORRIDOR ISSUES TO BE STUDIED
Administrator Batchelder explained that the City has received a formal
request from MASAC to consider and submit a list of Corridor Issues to
MASAC by August 17, 1998 for their consideration. Batchelder explained
that the MSP Noise Mitigation Program includes an airport operations
directive to Evaluate Departure Procedures in the Eagan -Mendota Heights
Corridor. He stated that this topic has been added to the MASAC Work Plan
for 1998. Batchelder stated that the MASAC is asking the City of Mendota
Heights, and other corridor communities, for a list of suggested topics.
Batchelder explained that at the Commission's July meeting, the Commission
reviewed Eagan's request of corridor issues to be studied and provided
direction to City staff on preparing our own list. Batchelder explained that
based on that discussion, he drafted a letter to Bob Johnson, Chair of
MASAC for the Commission's review and comment.
Commissioner Roszak stated that he would like to see the City's letter
supplemented with more details of specific issues.
Regarding Corridor Compliance, Chair Beaty stated that he agrees that
aircraft operations should be maintained inside the designated southeast
corridor and that operations should be narrowed as well. Administrator
Batchelder stated that with the new technology in navigational aids,
narrowing operations in the corridor should be considered.
Commissioner May inquired about the Corridor Configuration and the
establishment of the 095 degree heading policy. Batchelder briefly reviewed
the Blue Ribbon Task Force recommendation which recommended two
changes for implementation - the non -simultaneous departure procedures and
the establishment of the 095 degree policy.
The Commission discussed how the City should remind the MASAC of the
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION - AUGUST 12, 1998 MINUTES 2
Blue Ribbon Task Force recommendations and that only one recommendation
\ \
has been implemented. The COnl[OisSiOD diSCUSS8d how the City should
'
remind the M/\S/\COfthe (}q5 degree heading policy and inquire aStOwhy it
has not been implemented.
Regarding narrowing operations of the corridor, Administrator Batchelder
explained that the City should reiterate its position on stopping excursions
from pushing the corridor boundaries iOthat the operational abilities Of
aircraft have improved over the years. He informed the ConnnniooiOn that
during the NOISE conference, it was indicated that the FA/\'a ayata[n is old
and that aircraft are capable ofdealing with air noise iaoues/uonoerDo. He
stated that there iaanother departure procedure being used utthe San
Francisco Airport.
Chair Beaty stated that heioconcerned that ifthe City agrees tOthe {)95
degree policy, it may be tough to change the policy five years from now once
the GPS is implemented. He stated that he does not want to see aircraft
continue tnsway. Hesuggested that the City consider suggesting that the
corridor be narrowed with no excursions ever exceeding the 095 degree
heading.
Commissioner Stein noted his concern with implementing the GPS' He
stated that heiaconcerned that specific areas inthe City will continuously
beexperiencing overflights.
The Commission was of the consensus that the following items be included
within the list of issues to be considered during MAS/\C'o review of the
Southeast Corridor issues:
7' Corridor Compliance
A. Aircraft operations should b8maintained inside the designated
southeast corridor.
B. CODtOUoUSiy utilize all available technological innp[OV8nn8DtS
including navigational aids, GPS and standard iOSt[UDl8nt
departure procedures to narrow the southeast corridor to [SSt[iCt
overflights to CO[Dnl8[Ci8l/iOdUSt[i8lzOOed land US83.
C. With the shift in magnetic headings, the original intent of tower
orders that are based on heading designations should be
reviewed.
^
\ /
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION - AUGUST 12'1998 MINUTES 3
We
2. Corridor Configuration
Subject tothe narrowing as noted above, consider the implementation
ofthe {}85 degree northern boundary recommended h»the Blue
Ribbon Task Force.
Regarding Vertical Departure Analysis, Administrator Batchelder informed the
Commission that the San Francisco Airport implement a departure procedure
that is different than the Close -In or Distant Departure. Commissioner May
suggested that City staff inquire with other airports to find out if the Vertical
Departure procedure, or something similar to this procedure, is being
implemented. He suggested that o copy of the video, which was presented
at the NOISE conference in July, be sent and reviewed by staff as well as
the Airport Relations Commission.
The Commission was of the consensus that the following item be included
within the list of iaauaa to be consider during K4AS/\C'e review of the
Southeast Corridor:
3. Vertical Departure Analysis
\
Alternative departure profiles should be reconsidered. Altitude analysis \
should be performed to determine aircraft proximity tOground levels at
incremental distances from runway ends to be compared to aircraft
capability. Departure procedures testing is required.
Regarding Head to Head Operations, Chair Beaty stated that the Preferential
Runway Use SvatarV pn)rDotaa inequitable distribution of aircraft over
Mendota Heights and the fact that this happens during night time hours
when air traffic is very light.
The Commission discussed how the crosswind runway is not being used to
help relieve the burden OOthe parallel rUOVV8VG. The Commission felt it
important to iOfO[Dl the MAS/\C that with the [8C8Ot [000OstIUCtiOO Of
rUDVV8y 12R/3[)L, it has been demonstrated how the Runway Use SVStHDlS
was intended to VvO[k.
The CoD101iSSiOO was Ofthe consensus that the following item be included
within the list Of iaoU8S to be consider during M/\S/\C'S [8Vi8Vv Of the
/\
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION AUGUST 12'1a98MINUTES 4 \ /
Southeast Corridor:
4. Equity of Runway Use System - The existing RUS is inequitable and
relies too heavily on land use compatibility theories.
1. The RUS calls for the use of the crosswind runway, up to 20
percent of the time during the daytime, to relieve the burden on
the parallel runways. This has not occurred as prescribed and
should be considered. The recent reconstruction of runway
12R/30L has demonstrated how RUS was intended to work and
does work.
2. Head -to -Head Operations requires the divergence of departures
over residential areas of Mendota Heights, often during night
time hours when traffic is very light, reducing the effectiveness
of the non -simultaneous departure procedures. Rerouting of in-
bound traffic or modification of head-to-head procedures should
be adopted.
Commissioner Roszak moved to recommend that the City Council approve
the draft letter, as amended above, and that it be sent to Mr. Bob Johnson,
of MASAC, as soon as possible.
Commissioner Stein seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
The Commission commended Administrator Batchelder for his fine work in
drafting the letter to Mr. Bob Johnson, of MASAC.
UPDATES
MASAC Handbook
Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission that the City received a
MASAC handbook. He stated that the handbook has a wealth of information
and that there are many chapters to the handbook which include MASAC
operations information and staff ing/personnel information. Batchelder
reviewed the table of contents within the handbook. He informed the
Commission that he will request additional copies for each Commissioner. It
was noted that Chair Beaty had received a copy because he is the City's
MASAC alternate representative.
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION - AUGUST 12, 1998 MINUTES 5
MAC and FAA Response on City Council Resolution
on Corridor Compliance
Administrator Batchelder reminded the Commission that at their June 16,
1998 regular meeting, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 98-35, A
RESOLUTION TO PROVIDE OFFICIAL NOTICE {}FPROLONGED HEADING
VIOLATIONS CONTRARY T[}ADOPTED RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR
NOISE MITIGATION AT [NSP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. He explained that
this Resolution was in response to corridor violations on the evening of June
14, 1998 and in response to the release of data by the K4/\C'a AKj[)K4S
system that showed repeated excursions north of the corridor over the last
year.
Batchelder stated that the City has received 8 response from Mr. Roy
FuhrmaDn, MAC Technical Adviser, and from Mr. Doug Powers, Interim
Tower Chief, F/\/\' He informed the Commission that according to both
letters, on the evening Of June 14 there were 16 operations north of the
proposed 095 degree policy boundary during the time referred 10inthe City's
resolution. He stated that these excursions were precipitated by
thunderstorm activity and pilot requests to ovoid poor weather conditions.
Batchelder reminded the Commission that later this year, the M/\SAC will be
reviewing the corridor departure procedures as part ofits 1898 action plan- (
\
Choir Beaty inquired if the MAC has responded to Eegon'S oonoarDa'
Administrator Batchelder stated that he will look into this further.
1998 NOISE Conference
Administrator Batchelder briefed the Commission regarding his recent
attendance, with K4ayorW8e[toOoot1o, to the 1998 Noise Conference. He
informed the Commission that the conference was held in Denver, Colorado
and that itproved tobeaworthwhile conference. He stated that they had
several good sessions which included information regarding Environmental
|nlp8o1 Statements as well as information regarding Port 150 program as
wells as o Pori 101 program. Batchelder explained that the Part 161
program has been approved by the F/\/\ and has not yet been implemented.
Chair Beaty inquired ifnew technology was reviewed otthe conference.
Batchelder responded that Stage |\/aircraft are projected to be in operation
bythe year 2[}26.
Batchelder stated that there was 8 lot Of information OD 18Od use and it
( `
/
\
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION ' AUGUST 12'1SSOMINUTES 6
appeared that the FAA iatrying 10 expend its authority on land use issues.
\ `)
He eLotad that hotoured the Denver International Airport and that it appears
that the airport had enough space to add 12 more runways. He stated that
he also toured the United Airlines Training Facility.
ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS
REPO RTS/CORRESPON DENCE
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Airport Noise Reports for July
3 and July 17, 1998. It was noted that American Airlines has become the
first major Cur[iertopunohosaanevVoyoterndauiQnedbyF\aiabeok
CornrnarciO| Air Group which converts Stage U Boeing 727 aircraft to Stage
IU noise standards with Oosuppression ofengine noise orengine
modifications.
The Connrnioainn acknowledged receipt of the M/\SAC Agenda for July 28,
19q8and June 23,19q8Minutes.
The Commission acknowledged receipt ofthe M/\SAC Technical Advisor's
Report for June 1998. The Commission noted that Runway 4-22 was used
47.2 percent of the time during the month of June.
The Commission acknowledged receipt ofthe K4ASACCorridor Gate
Penetration Analysis for June 1938.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Monthly Complaint Summary
for June 1998.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Operations Committee
Agenda/Minutes for July 10, 1998.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Operations Cornrnbtea
Agenda for August 14, 1998.
The CODlDliSsiOO acknowledged receipt of the Eagan ARC Agenda for August
11, 1998.
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION - AUGUST 12,1998 MINUTES 7
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Airport Ae|adoDo Commission adjourned
its meeting at B:[}[) p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
k{irnbedeek[' Blaeoar
Senior Secretary
/
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION - AUGUST 12'1S38MINUTES 8 \-