05-13-1998 ARC MinutesCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION
MAY 13, 1998 - MINUTES
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held
on Wednesday, May 11, 1998 in the City Hall Large Conference Room, 1 10 1
Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. The following
members were present Beaty, Leuman, Stein, Roszak and Fitzer. Commissioners
May and Des Roches were excused. Also present were City Administrator Kevin
Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
DISCUSSION OF MONITORING
NON -SIMULTANEOUS DEPARTURES
Administrator Batchelder explained that the MASAC Operations Committee
has discussed the City's request to monitor non -simultaneous departure
procedures. He stated that at a recent MAC meeting, MAC staff presented a
Scope of Analysis: Crossing in the Corridor as their proposed methodology
for fulfilling the City's request.
Batchelder informed the Commission that Ms. Cindy Greene, FAA, has stated
that the FAA will not provide MAC the information necessary to detail
controller time periods, as requested in Section 1.2 of the Scope of Analysis:
Crossing in the Corridor. Batchelder stated that Ms. Greene has indicated
that there are too many variable factors the controller has to weigh in making
a decision to release a departure. He stated that Ms. Greene is concerned
that the flight track data and ANOMS will show departure headings
inconsistent with non -simultaneous departures without the explanation of
why the controller made this decision. He stated that the FAA has indicated
that they are not willing to devote a lot of time and resources to providing
these explanations on every flight during non -simultaneous periods and does
not want their controller's decisions to be micro managed.
Batchelder stated that the MAC will move forward with the study on the
basis that there is only one controller in the tower between 11:00 p.m. and
6:00 a.m. on weekdays and during time periods on the weekends.
The Commission discussed head to head operations and how often these
operations occur negating the opportunity to use non -simultaneous
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 1
departures. They discussed the use of Runway 4-22 during these
operations. Chair Beaty stated that during head to head operations the air
noise is not equitably distributed and that Runway 4-22 should be used to
help relieve the constant air noise. Batchelder discussed the Runway Use
System and stated that head-to-head operations are in place to help give the
City of Minneapolis some relief. Chair Beaty stated that this is unfair.
Beaty stated that air noise is significant during the day. Batchelder stated
our request for information regarding non -simultaneous operations is during
nighttime and weekend operations. Beaty stated that there are people home
during the day and that the City should push for centerline headings not only
during evening hours but also during daytime hours. Batchelder stated that
during non -simultaneous periods, the FAA will follow the specific tower
orders but that non -simultaneous periods only last for brief periods of time
during weekdays and the FAA may not shift to one controller. He stated the
FAA is claiming it is too difficult to log non -simultaneous periods during the
weekday. He stated that the City's request is a practical one and that we
should consider focusing our concerns during nighttime and weekend
operations.
Chair Beaty stated that he is home during the day and that the air traffic is
bad. He stated that there is some relief when Runway 4-22 is being used.
Commissioner Fitzer reminded the Commission that aircraft can drift and that
they can be given a runway heading and that it can be changed once
departure control assumes responsibility of the aircraft. Regarding runway
headings, Fitzer suggested that maybe the tower is giving a heading that
departure control is not aware of.
Commissioner Leuman suggested that City staff confirm what role departure
control plays at the airport. Batchelder informed the Commission that Bruce
Wagoner is no longer tower chief and that Doug Powers, is the interim chief.
Administrator Batchelder explained that it is time for the Commission to
review its Plan of Action which was adopted last August. He stated that in
past years, the Commission has reviewed this document in May, June and
July and presented its report to the Council in August.
The Commission briefly discussed the Comprehensive Plan amendment
process and how important it is that the Aviation Chapter does not get too
specialized. They discussed how specific action steps should not be included
in the Comprehensive Plan because they might become obsolete in the near
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 2
future.
Regarding priority issues, the Commission felt that the Equity of Current
Runway Use System should be placed as their top priority and that MAC and
MASAC Representation should be moved to second on the list.
Chair Beaty inquired about the progress regarding the City of Inver Grove
Heights suggestion to request a variance in runway separation. Batchelder
stated that the Council reviewed the NDCARC Collaborative Issues and
determined that the City of Mendota Heights should not play a significant
role within the NDCARC. They suggested that the NDCARC consider
meeting quarterly as opposed to monthly. He explained that the Council has
taken a neutral position regarding Inver Grove Heights' suggestion.
Batchelder stated that the Airport Commission should discuss the value of
the coalition. Chair Beaty noted his displeasure with Council's position. He
stated that he feels the Coalition is an important group and that it is
unfortunate that the City Council has such a distrust with the Cities of Eagan
and Inver Grove Heights. He stated that there is enough common interest to
keep the Coalition to meet on a regular basis. He stated that there are
several positive issues the Coalition has discussed and that they have stood
united on several topics such as the Close In Departure procedures and
MASAC restructuring. Commissioner Stein concurred with Chair Beaty.
Chair Beaty stated that the Coalition should be revitalized. Batchelder stated
that he will continue to attend the meetings and that the meetings do help
educate Mendota Heights as to the issues other Cities face regarding the
airport. Commissioner Roszak suggested that the Coalition generate a new
set of ideas to pursue. Commissioner Leuman suggested that the Coalition
continue pursuing the Runway Separation Issue.
The Commission noted how the Coalition helped to make the MASAC run
more efficiently. It was noted that the City is receiving improved agendas
with cover memorandums.
The Commission made the following changes to its Airport Plan of Action:
Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures
Goal: Implementation of Non -Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which
Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure
Action Steps
Who When
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 3
1 Request Copy of Tower Order that Staff July
Implement's NSDP's
2. Monitor Compliance with Tower Order Staff/ARC Continuous
3. NSDPs - Request Compliance Staff/ARC Sept.
The Commission noted that Action Steps 1-3 have been accomplished. It
was noted that the City will be receiving a report regarding NSDP
compliance.
4. Pursue Magnetic Shift Affect on Staff/ARC FAA is
105 Degree Heading on 11 L Implement.
Administrator Batchelder stated that the MASAC has review of the
Southeast Corridor scheduled as a goal during 1998. The Commission felt
that this item should remain within the Action Plan.
Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures
Goal: Adoption of "Close -In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to
Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights
Action Steps Who When
1 Seek Political Assistance from Staff/ARC August
legislative leaders - Send Correspondence
to MAC
2. MAC Planning and Environment reports Staff/ARC August
recommendation to MAC.
3. MAC recommends to FAA procedure Staff/ARC
To be implemented.
Regarding No. 3, Administrator Batchelder stated that this did not go in favor
of Mendota Heights. It was noted that the FAA did not implement the Close
In procedure until March 1. It was noted that the review of NADP's is a part
of the MASAC 1998 goals and that the MASAC Operations Committee will
be discussing this item in September. The Commission felt that this item
should remain a part of the Action Plan.
Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures
Goal: Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 4
Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights
Action Steps Who When
1 Inquire with FAA Control Tower about Staff August
current head-to-head operations
2. Suggest using crosswind runway more ARC Fall 1997
frequently during head-to-head operations
3. Monitor MSP Mitigation Comprehensive ARC/Council 1997
Plan designated Stage III only from 10:30 p.m.
until 6:00 a.m. and assist MAC in implementing
voluntary agreements with airlines.
The Commission discussed how the MAC is working with airlines, although
runway construction is affecting the operations at MSP. Commissioner Fitzer
stated that the construction should be cutting down the head-to-head
operations. It was noted that the City is receiving air noise complaints from
residents living in northern Mendota Heights.
Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures
Goal: Implementation of Narrowed Air Traffic Corridor which
Minimizes Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure
Action Steps Who When
1 Advocate for maintenance of 5 mile final Staff/ARC Continuous
arrivals and 3 mile corridor for departures
2. Pursue the benefit of updating tower orders Staff/ARC Fall 1997
to original intent before shift
in magnetic headings.
3. Presentation for Commission on GPS by Staff Fall 1997
MAC or other expert (Mr. Harold Pierce)
Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns
Goal: Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 5
Action Steps
Who When
1 Continue to inform the community Staff/ARC Continuous
on ARC projects and concerns using the
City's newsletter and separate single page mailings.
2. Work with NDCARC on possible legislation Staff/ARC Continuous
for MAC representation.
3. Mail letters and Heights Highlites to Staff Continuous
State Senators and Representatives
regarding ARC issues.
4. Invite guests to monthly ARC meetings Staff Continuous
(i.e., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State (Quarterly)
elected officials)
Regarding No. 4, the Commission felt that a stronger effort should be placed
in inviting more guests to Commission meetings.
5. Expand coverage of air noise issues Staff/ 1997
by pursuing informational meetings with Council
editorial staffs of major papers.
Regarding No. 5, the Commission felt that this is still an excellent idea and
that the City should take a more proactive role in informing the media of
Mendota Heights concerns.
6. Continue to send press releases to
newspapers, State Senators and
Representatives.
7. Update and promote air noise mitigation
document.
Staff/ARC Annually
Regarding No. 7, Administrator Batchelder stated that the Mitigation Needs
Statement document needs to be updated. He suggested that the
Commission consider discussing this issue at their June meeting.
Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns
Goal: Appointment of City Resident to the MAC
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 6
Action Steps Who When
1 Discuss concerns with State Senators ARC/ Dec. 97/
and Reps. Regarding composition of Council Jan. 98
MAC. Pursue legislation to amend MAC
Commissioner appt. process.
Regarding No. 1, Chair Beaty suggested that state officials be invited to
attend Airport meetings bimonthly. He stated that a stronger lobbying
efforts needs to be made by the City.
2. Discuss and compare cities affected by ARC 1998
air noise to MAC representatives
3. Review MASAC representation and ARC/Staff 1997/
MAC representation with NDCARC ... 1998
Propose new structure and representation
on MASAC.
Regarding No. 3, the Commission noted that the City has been very
successful in getting MAC's attention. It was, noted that additional seats
have been added for the Cities of Mendota Heights, Eagan and Minneapolis.
The Commission discussed MAC representation and that it should not be
statewide representation but metro wide, elected, representation. In
response to a question from Chair Beaty, Administrator Batchelder stated
that the AMM is the lobbyist for metropolitan communities and is currently
reviewing this issue.
Issue: MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan
Goal: Prevent Construction of Third Parallel Runway
Action Steps Who When
1. Monitor MAC Compliance with Contract Staff/ARC Continuous
2. Research MAC Acquisition of Bureau of Staff 19987
Mines property and MAC interest in off
airport properties in 3rd runway area.
3. Monitor EIS Process for N/S Runway Staff/ARC 1997/
1998
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998. 7
Regarding No. 3, Administrator Batchelder stated that this past week, the
City has received the EIS document.
4. Monitor EIS for 12,000 foot Runway Staff/ARC 1997
Issue: MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan
Goal: Implement Noise Mitigation Requirements in MSP Mitigation
Committee's Comprehensive Plan
Action Steps Who When
1 Implement MAC's MSP Mitigation Plan Staff/ARC 1997/
1998
a. MASAC Action Plan for Implementation
b. Joint Efforts with NDCARC
C. Dakota County Assistance
d. Legislative Assistance
Regarding Letter a., Administrator Batchelder stated that this items is being
addressed by the MASAC.
Issue: Conversion to Stage III Quieter Aircraft
Goal: Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000
Action Steps Who When
1 Work with MAC to assure 1996 Staff Completed
legislation to convert to all Stage III
aircraft by Year 2000 is implemented.
2. Consider backsliding of Stage III Conversion ARC Upon
response of
NWA
3. MASAC consideration of Stage III compliance
The Commission noted that NWA is behind in converting their fleet to Stage
Ill.
Issue: Noise Reduction Through Litigation
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 8
Goal: Determine Feasibility of a Legal Challenge to Current Air Noise
Distribution
Action Steps
Who When
1 Continue to be kept abreast of other Staff/ARC Continuous
communities' issues and possible
litigation process
2. Consider Freedom of Information Request Staff/ARC 1997
for EIS or FONSI's on increased operations
3. Consider legal challenge options if north/ Staff/ARC 1997/
south runway is delayed 1998
The Commission felt that this issue should remain within the Action Plan.
Issue: Expand Eligibility for Part 150 Sound Insulation Program in
Areas Affected by Air Noise Exposure
Goal: Air Noise Mitigation Through Sound Insulation
Action Steps
1 Continue to monitor changes in the Ldn
contours and monitor the Part 150
Sound Insulation program completion
process.
2. Examine the feasibility of purchase or
acquisition through Part 150 for severely
impacted areas
Who When
Staff/ARC On-going
ARC/ 1998
Council
3. Ensure ANOMs data used for Noise Contour Staff/ARC 1998
generation for 2005 Part 150 DNL 60
Regarding No. 3, the Commission acknowledged that they are currently
working on this step and that they will continue to discuss how more
effective the ANOMs data can be reported and used by the City.
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 9
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Airport Noise Report for April
24, 1998.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC agenda for April 28,
1998 and March 31, 1998 minutes.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Technical Advisor's
Report for March 1998. It was noted that MSP Stage 3 Count for 1998 is
55.2 percent.
Chair Beaty noted that there are more air noise complaints in March of 1998
than March of 1997.
Administrator Batchelder noted that the full ANOMs report should be
available by June.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Corridor Gate
Penetration Analysis for March 1998. It was noted that four percent of the
departures are penetrating the northern boundary of Mendota Heights. The
Commission felt it necessary to keep an eye on the northern excursions.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Operations Committee
Agenda/Minutes for April 17, 1998.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Appointments to
Executive and Operations Committee.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Monthly Part 150
Status Report.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Audit Summary.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Minnesota Military Expo and
934th Airlift Wing Fact Sheet.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the handouts presented to MASAC
on DNL Contours.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Eagan ARC Agenda for May
12, 1998.
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 10
There being nofurther business, the Airports Relation Commission moved to
adjourn its meeting at 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
KinnborlEfe K. BleeS8r
AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION MINUTES - MAY 13, 1998 11
C