The URL can be used to link to this page

07-10-1996 ARC Packet._ _._.__ ' CITV CDF IVIENDOTA HEIGH�'S DAICOTA GOUN7'Y, 1�9NIVESOT'A SPECIAL C11"Y COUIVCIL/AIRPOfiT RELAT601VS COfV1N11SSBON n/iEE'fItVG TOUR OF AIR NOISE-lIVIPAC'TED 1�REA5 i2F BVIENDOI'A HEIGHTS 1IVE[2t�ESD�4Y Jl9LV 10, 1996 ,, �US 9.E�4VES CITV HALL AT 7 P.M. AiRPORT RELAi'IONS COtiAiVi1SSIOIV - /�GENDA July 10, 1996 ��' Meeting to Begin in Large Conference Room foilowing Bus Tour *�* , 1. Cail to Order -(Following Bus Tour) -.:�< 2. Roil Call 3. Approval of I/lay 8, 1996 Meeting Minutes. 4. Unfinished and New' Business: (IVlemos available on ll�onday) a. Discuss Noise Abatement Departure Profiles b. Discuss IVlendota Heights Airport Plan of Action , c. Discuss Noise Mitigation Committee and, City Efforts 5. l)adates a. Review IVon Simultaneous Departure Procedures b. Review Backsliding and NWA Fleet Conversion Plan 6. Acknowledge Receipt of Various Reports/Correspondence: _ a. MASAC Agenda for June 25, 1996 and May 28,1996 Minutes . b. MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for May 1996 ` c. MASAC Complaint Summary for May 1996 d. MASAC Corridor Gate Penetration'`Analysis for May 1996 e. Airport Noise Report - May 27, 1996 f. Part 150 Buyout Update - issue 30 g. � City of Eagan - ARC Agenda`for July 9, 1996; h. SunCurrent Article of June 19, 1996 on Sound Insulation i. Eagan Cojrridor Resolution j. , Airport Fact Sheet 106 - Overview of MASAC k. National Helicopter Noise Coalition Newsletter 7. Other Comments or Concerns. 8. Adjourn. Auxiliary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a reotice of Bess #han 120 hours is receivetl, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short,notice. Please contact City Administration at 452-1850 with requests. -� - J` � � � � . • • ■ June 28, 1996 To: Mayor and City Council "� From: Kevin Batchelder, City Ad 's� tor Subject: Tour of Mendota. Heights to Visit Air Noise Impacted Areas I�ISCUSSION The Airport Relations Commission desires to schedule an evening bus tour of Mendota fIeights to visit areas of the City that are impacted by air traff'ic from MSP. They have requested that I schedule this tour and invite the City Council to join them on this tour. Mr. Ellsworth Stein, of the Airports Relation Commission, has stated that the School District will allow the use of a school bus to conduct this tour, given suff'icient notice of a date and time for the tour. If more than three City Councilmembers agree to participate, it would be considered a � public meeti.ng under the Mumesota Open Meeting Sta.tutes and Council will have to select a � da.te and time in order to properly announce the meeting. � 1 ' � '1' !1 Consider if Counc�l desires to participate in the proposed bus tour of 1Vlendota. I3eights, and if so, select a date to arrange the tour. 1 ' 1 1 I � :1' ; �. � . � )1 � , . AIItPORT RELA1'IONS CONaVI.ISSION JUNE 12, 1996 The regular meeting of the Mendota. Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, June 12, 1996, in the City Hall L,arge Conference Room, 1101 Victoria. Curve. The meeting was called to order at 7:10 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Beaty, Leuman, Stein and Surrisi. The following members were excused: Gross, Fitzer and Olsen. Also present were City Administrator Kevin Batchelder and Recording Secretary Car1a. Wirth. Beaty and the Commissioners congratulated Batchelder on his recent appointment as City Administrator. Batchelder introduced Cazla Wirth, the Recording Secretary for the next three months. Bea.ty commented that the Friday News should include the Airport Relations Commission's agenda.to alert Councilmembers their items of discussion. , ,,, � � �r Commissioner,�euman moved approval of the May 8, 1996 minutes. Commissioner Stein seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 , � � � , �, � .• � • ��. ��. �� Sa. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC May 23, 1996, and Apri123, 1996, Minutes. 5b. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC �echnical Advisor's Report for Apri11996 (Incomplete). Beaty explained the report is incomplete due to an equipment failure. �. Sc. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the May 21, 1996, minutes of the Northern Dakota County Auport Rela.tions Coalition. Beaty noted a major topic of discussion was backsliding and NWA's fleet mix of Stage II and Stage III aircraft. Beaty stated �, the percentage of Stage III use has declined since September of 1985. Batchelder stated that prior to the next meeting of the Coalition, each city is to bring its list of mitigation efforts so discussion can take place on what to support as a group. Dakota County will then be approached to determine their support level. On 7une 26, 1996, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, St. Pau1 and Minneapolis will be making its presenta.tion to the MSP Mitigation Committee. Mendota Heights already made its presentation but reserved the right to make an addition, if desired. Stein indica.ted. an interest in flying the two departure profiles via the NWA test simulator at NATCO. The Commission indicated an interest in participating and requested Batchelder to schedule this event. Surrisi advised of Sun Country simulator test hours. 5d. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Part 150 Buyout Upda.te - Issues 28 and 29. Se. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Operations Minutes and Agenda for May 24, 1996. Batchelder explained that Mendota Heights has subrmitted upda.ted household and population counts for MAC's consultant to work into the calculation; however, several meetings were canceled and City staff was not notified of the outcome until just prior to the May meeting. At the meeting, Northwest Airlines and Bob � Johnson of MASAC presented new popula.tion counts and noise pmfiles. He reviewed this data. and noted Mendota Heights' statistics for distant departures show a population count of 1,580 ' the DNL60 contour and 1,180 in the DNL65; however, the close-in departure stati �s�i'cs show population counts of 1,840 in the DNL60 and 900 in the DNL65 contours. Beaty stated these statistics are impossible. Batchelder concuned and stated stafF has submitted current household and population counts to the MAC. Discussion ensued regazding the distance procedure and DNL contours for the close-in departure procedure versus the distance procedure. Batchelder raised the concem, at the MASAC meeting, regarding the validity of the data used in their decision. Batchelder explained Mendota. Heights had indicated in the past they would like to try the close-in departure procedure to see if it will reduce noise. He sta.ted Mendota I3eights should consider an operational change if the close in departure procedure will reduce noise levels over Mendota. Heights. Bea.ty noted the indication that the benefit will be over Minneapolis but the MASAC intends to run the same take ofF procedures over Mendota Heights. C 2 Batchelder pointed out that with DNL60, the distance departure procedure is better for � Mendota. I�eights but with DNL65, it is worse. He stated he believes the population � counts used in the DNL65 calcula.tions are conect, but the counts used i.n the DNL60 calculations are not, especially for the close in departures. Batchelder noted the MASAC Operations Committee recommendation for the "Distant Community � Depariure Profile" utilization on runways 11L/R and runways 4/22 and the "Close-in Community Depamire Profile" utalization on ruaways 29L/R passed on a split 5-2 vote. Batchelder informed the commission that because Jill Snuth raised concern about the calculations and com7mented on the ANOMS system (which generates the noise contours) at the MASAC meeting, they tabled it to their June meeting. Smith has suggested the MASAC base their decision on accurate information and should use ANOMS da.ta. Batchelder noted the location of the additional population counts as shown by MAC for the close in departures would be in the Dodge Nature Center. The Commission questioned the need for a hasty decision on such an important issue and indicated support to test this method to see if it will help. '1'hey concurred with Smith's belief it would be better to use ANOMS data rather than a household count. Batchelder pointed out a discrepancy in the MASAC meeti.ng mi.nutes (middle of page 3) which indicates "the number of dwellings do coincide with the population count" when, in fact, they do not coincide, which was pointed out at the meeting. O The Commission requested that this information be presented to Councilmember Jill Smith who can discuss the housel�o,�d and population data discrepancies at the next MASAC meeti.ng. She wi11 also urge them to use ANOMS data. instead. Consensus was�eached to request Batchelder to sapply Councilmember Smith with this information �nd submit a press release regazding the City's concern with this hasty MASAC decision and with the data. used in its consideration. GF,N�RAT DISCUSSION Ken and Mary Weisenbuger, residents of Friendly Hills, asked if airport noise wi11 increase in their neighborhood and whether their neighborhood is eligible for soundproofmg. Batchelder advised that the carrent Part 150 Sound Insulation Prog7am is based on DNL65 which does not extend to the Friendly Iiills area.. Ken Weisenburger commented on the noise of aircraft which results in loss of their ability to enjoy the outdoors, especially during the summer months. Beaty reviewed the Commission's history and attempts to resolve these concerns as well as procedural changes. 3 � Batchelder advised that the Mayor presented the City's positioa that the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program should be extendeci to the DNL65 area at the 7une 3, 1996 MSP Mitigation Committee meeting. ( � 1 ,,1 I'; i � ,). Sf. The Commission acknowledged the City of Eagan - ARC Agendas for May 14, May 23, and June 11, 1996. 5g. The Commission ackc�owledged receipt of the SMAAC Newsletter for May, 1996. Beaty requested his name be pla.ced on the mailing list for this Newsletter. Batchelder explained issuance is inegular but staff will provide copies of the SMAAC Newsletter whenever it is published. Sh. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the StatTribune Article of June 4, 1996, on MSP Mitigation Committee. Si. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Zoni.ng News Article, "The Trouble with Airports. " Batchelder provided a brief synopsis of the articles contained within. Stein requested a copy of the 'Airport Noise Report"by Anne �I. Kohut. Weisenburger expressed concern regarding stability of property values due to this increasing levels of airport noise. Weisenburger expressed his inte � r�s� in this issue and volunteered to help get information out to residents. Surrisi suggested an informational handout be considered to better inform Tesidents. She also suggested consideration of signage in various neighborhoods�and possibly to support a"walk" at the airport which will result in media coverage. Bea,ty commented on the hesitancy to "raise red flags" dae to concern with a drop in overall housing valuations which is what happened in south Minneapolis. Batchelder suggested the meeting agenda, be rear.ranged so considera,tion is first given ta Unfinished and New Business to assure these action items receive proper time. Consensus was rea,ched to try this new format at the next meeting with the various reports and correspondence being considered as "Upda,te Items". � l 1� • :1 : • I' �� . �, ♦ Batchelder requested input from Commissioners regarding any change they would like made to this draft including prioritization of Topics of Interest, if desired. 4 ( ( ; Bea.ty suggested Mendota Heights representation on MAC and MASAC be added since it in the Plan of Action. Consensus reached. Stein requested that prevention of the north parallel third runway be pla.ced back on the Topics of Interest as item 16. Consensus reached. Discussion was held with each Commissioner indicating their priority topics with the following consensus reached: l. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures. 2. Global Positioning Satellite Technology (Implemented 1995-96). 4. Nighttime Restrictions bn Aircraft Opera.tions. 9-10. Noise Measurement Issues - Usefulness of Ldn 65 Contour and Equity of Cunent Runway Use System; and EZcpansion of MAC Aircraft Noise Opera.tions Monitoring System (ANOMS). 13. Equity of Current Runway Use 5ystem. The following topics will be added to the list: 15. MAC and MSAC Representation. .� 16. Prevention of Third Parallel Runway. 1'7. �oise Abatement Departure Profiles. Batchelder used a map to review the tower headings for the two runways during non- simultaneous depariures and cha.nge of degrees due to a shift in magnetic headings which resalts in more airplane activity over Mendota. Heights' residential areas versus industrial areas. Mendota Heights would like to continue to pursue a centerline heading which will keep the flight pattern over industrial areas. Beaty noted this was d.iscussed at the 1a.st meeting but the Commission determined not to worry about the magnetic shift, at this time, and to focus on the crossing patterne Consensus was rea.ched to direct staff to draft a letter to the FAA-Great Lalces Region outlining the history of the enforcement issue since 1992 with copies to local staff, �Zepresenta.tive Bruce Vento, Senator Paul Wellstone, and Senator Rod Grams to upda.te them of these issues and for considera.tion by the Mayor and Council. Consensus was also reached to add this action to the P1an of Action. � �. The Commission then reviewed and discussed each of the issues, goals, and action steps in the Air Noise Plan of Action, narrowing the comdor, and need to enforce �� operational procedures. They suggested City staff scan radio tower communications to � monitor transmissions to assure they comply with operational procedures. Consensus was rea.ched to modify the Air Noise Plan of Action, Page 7, #5, December through February, to invite Senators and Representa.tives to meetings to hear concerns - add date. Surrisi questioned the option of declaring the wetland as a protected area within the proposed path of t�e third runway area. The Commission requested Batchelder research consultants who have expertise in tlus area. Beaty requested that Batchelder assigti dates to the action steps. With regard to backsliding, Batchelder suggested a joint discussion between communities where the facts can be laid out and then addressed at an upcoming MASAC meeting. The Commission directed Batchelder to finalize the Mendota Heights Airport P1an of Action for consideration at the July 16, 1996, meeting. DISCUSS N(3ISE MI"�IGATION COMIVIITTEE AND REVVI�W NOISE MITIGATION PLAN �. The Commission complimented 11�,yor Mertensotto on the Airport Noise Mitigation Position Statement and letter he prepared. Batchelder noted they did reserve the right to present additipnal information to the MSP Mitigation Committee. � Beaty inquired regarding the need to establish a corridor boundary so it caa be determined if Mendota Iieights supports a narrowing of the corridor. Surrisi raised. the option of flying the River in and out. Beaty extended the Commission's appreciation to the Mayor for his active role in this important issue. Chairman Bea.ty moved to support the City of Mendota. Heights Airport Noise Mitigation Position Statement and encourage the Council to pursue it. Commissioner Leuman seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 The Commission reviewed the MSP Runway Configuration Use and noted it indicates Mendota Heights receives 44 % of the takeoff activity. Beaty requested Batchelder 0 determine how the 2005 DNL: contour information was derived and how it will be achieved. The benefit of more modern equipment was noted as well as sprea.ding out air i;raffic once the new runway is completed. The Commission requested Batchelder find out the hea.ding for 11 L during construction of Runway 11 R. �; � •;• �I � � �. � � �,� � Batchelder stated �e will inform Jill Smith regarding this issue, as discussed. DISCUSS BACKSI.IDING AND NWA FLEET CONVERSION PLAN Batchelder reviewed the lustory of NWA's Noise Agreements at MSP and stated he will inform 7ill Smith and the Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition about this topic. Surrisi commented it would be interesting to review the Noise Agreements which NWA presents to other communities. The Commission next reviewed the NWA Sta.ge III Compliance Plan. ; ) The Commission requested Batchelder draft a letter under the Ma.yor's signature to the NDCARC for review at the next..�eeting and encourage all Dakota. County communities to send a similar letter at the same ti�me. J REVViEW NON SIlC�IULTANEOUS DEPARTURE PROCEDUItT5 The Commission reviewed the non simultaneous departure procednres. � � • � � '' 1 '1 1 ' � :1' :' :1 :1 l � The Commission reviewed the Community Air Noise Update in the Mendota Heights Highlites. OTTH�'�:R COMMT.NTS OR CONCEI2NS Stein commented on the DC-9's which are eqaipped with a hush kit and stated there is a definite difference (reduction) in the noise generated. Stein inquired when a fieldtrip tour of the City will be scheduled. The Commission requested Batchelder schedule an evening tour and Stein ask whether a school bus can be used. Surrisi advised she will not be able to attend the next meeting and will check with her office to see if they receive copies of the Airport Noise Report . If so, she will provide the City with a copy. Stei.n stated he may not be present at the July meeting. � ' 1 � 1: ►1��1 �Y There being no further comments, the Airport Relations Commission moved to adjourn its meeting at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carla M. Wirth Recording Secreta.ry TimeSaver Off Site Secretaria.l -� � � � � f F1�,: :I ; C:' 1 �1 : � Ju1y 10, 1996 To: Aupart Relat�ons Commission From: Kevin Batchelder Ci}�� Adm�nis� 9 �J Subject: New Business Items for July 10, 1996 Meeting Followuig tonight's bus tour, the Co�missio� should discuss the following items: 1. 1Voise Abatement ]�eparture l�rofiles 2. 1Vlendota gIeights Airport P1an of Action 3, 1VISP Noise Mitigation Committee Noise Abatement Denarture Pro%les At the 7une 25, 1996 MASAC 1Vgeeting, 1ViASAC again considered the recommendation ; 1 from the MA.SAC Operations Committee that the "Close-In" departure procedure be used for `' - only those departures ofF of 29L and 29I2 over 1Vlinneapolis. A11 other runways would continue to use the "Distant" departure procedures, which is the current operations practice. MASAC did not act on this recommendat�on at tl�eir meeting in May, and at their meeting in June they again carried this item over fox further considerat�on. Councilmember 7i11 Smith, our MASAC representa,tive, sta.ted that there is concern over the da.ta used for population and household counts, as well as othe� concerns by sunound�ng communities. As regards the household and popula�on counts, sta.ff will be meeting with MAC representatives on Thursda.y to look at the population and household counts in detaal. It is hopecl that ihis will enable us to determine the accuracy of the da.ta. and be more precise about the affect of the proposed departure profiles. At the June meeting, the Commission directed that staff and the Commission assist Councilmember Smith in her efforts at 1VIASAC. Please see attached population counts and DNL contours. Mendota Hei,�hts Plan of Action At the June meeting, the Commission prioritazed the Topics of �nterest list. (Please see attached Updated Topics of Interest List.) Because of Summer tirne schedules, Cormmyssion Chair Beaty has requested that the Air Noise Act�on Plan be presented to the City Council at their August 20, 1996 meeta.ng. This will g�ve the Air Noise Commission one more meeting to consider the Air Noise Plan of Action for additions, conect�ons or suggestions. �'lease see attached plan.) MSP Miti�,ation Committee The MSP' Mitigation Committee lnet agai.n on June 26, 1996, at wluch time Inver Grove Iieights, Eagan, Minneapolis and St. Paul gave their presentations on Noise Mitigation. Ea.ch communities issues are summarized in the attached 7uly 17, 1996 Meeting Notice enclosed with this memo. �acicsliclin� oi Stage II The Commission has expressed a co�cern about the reduct�on in overall use of Stage III operations at MSP since September 1995. Atta.ched please find a Stage III report for 1995-96. ' ; C �•� •� a � � � •�• �. � .�� ,.. � ..� 1. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures. 2. Global Positioning Satellite Technology (Implemented 1995-96). 3. Phase Out of Noisy Sfiage II Aircraft. 4. Nighttime Restrictions on Aircraft Operations. 5. MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues - Expansion of Existing Airport. 6. FAA Airspace Usage Study. 7. Corridor Definition/Compliance Issues. 8. Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related Land Use Controls. 9. Noise Measurement Issues - Usefulness of Ldn 65 Contour and Equity of Current Runway Use System. 10. Noise Measurement Issues - Usefulness of Ldn 65 Contour and Expansion of MAC Aircraft Noise Operations IVlonitoring System (ANOMS). 11. Aircraft Ground Noise During Periods of Departure Over Minneapolis. 12. Aircraft Engine Run-Up Noise. 13. Equity of Current Runway Use System. 14. MSP Mitigation Committee. �; � C _ : ► • ' _ ►� • _ �7�a Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Implementation of Non-Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure 1. 2. 3. �4: ;��r; Review previous MAC representations on issue wi#h City Council. Draft letter to MAC requesting update on revised non-simultaneous takeoff procedures - invite Mr. Hamiel to upcoming ARC meeting. Depending upon response, chose appropriate means of advocating rapid implementation of new procedures. ��.;:::.;�.;::.x.:.:.;:.t:.:>.�:.:<:�::>:.::;:.::::;.;::::+:.;::>�«<::��:>�.:;. x.�;i>�'��::::��<��i�ir�:�`>��::::: :��:�:::>��r�g:::;�:��:�:� :.::::::::::: �:::::::.�...:::::.�.:. 3zir�:�t`�::::�:;��`:::��:i:�::<�k'��;;�i��:Y: .:.a:::::::.:: . x :��€�;:.'..`::;,.>� ::.:::::�'`��`�;�'��: : : � :::::�F�.�::::��;�::::��i: :�::: �::::::: �.�.:::::: �� .:::::...................................... :::��:#��::<�'"`'"� ��`:��:>:�i:��€��:�� :::<��`;;>'�>:'�:;� .:::::::::.�:::.�:�� :.::........:......:...:....:.:�........... ( ) 1 Who When Staff/ ARC Completed Staff Completed Staff/ Completed ARC C C � Issue: Goal: .�, i►_► • _ ` _..: ► '� � � Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Adoption of "Close-In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Procedures to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights. Action SteRs_: 1. Review FAA requirements with City Council. 2. �4 :.��,��.,'�: :�:�: Who Staff/ ARC Completed Continue participation on MASAC Staff/ Completed Operations Committee which is Council currently reviewing issue. �: x: :;::::<:;:;:.;:.::.::::.:>;:;::<:.;�.:>:.::.;,:::. :>;..::;. ::::�.;::.:<;.::.;:.;:.;.;::<.>:.;::;� :.;:;.;:;;:.:<>:.;: :.;..:�..;<;: :.:: : : »�:�: �.. �:;:�: .�c�r�t� �:�:::;�s��: >::: ::��.�::::��: ��?�� ;�#.�� .:�:.:��' .:::..:::::::::::: �.:::.�:::::::::.�:::::�::�:..:........................................... ............... �G::��.,Y,•;�� y: �j:J�I:�i:F! �; i:: iiiF'.h?Y{iy:i{.: ::i:•::•,:i' r::� ::i ':: ;:.. , {{� : : '�:�� .y.y .... : .:� i .':•• .� . . : `: ::: ::: . i? ::� �.:..:i:�::.i'.:.ii'..}.C?.i': •.i'.'f.::i'i':i:,l.i};..f.i:.i:.i::.i'.:i:.:i'Y.' . . . : : . :. �':::• '�::`:4M:I:T.•..76 ':': . �' �: ' � . .. � . � ... :f'�:�'k��:�:::��>:.;�..�':��::::�`�:�+�Kn��:�1�.::.:;::�•.�:::,::::::::::.�': ,.��...:��:::::�.::.�::::� ::::.:.�:::... ...............................� :ryi'{:i'.:{i::{:•"i::i:'�r''"'•'. x ................: :.•.:V :.:: .ry:: •.y:r :.::�:.:: y:::::: �:'��:��g:;:>�r��::::'�r��;��`�r�;��:;:��irr��:�; :.>::<:.>:.:�:.::.:::.:.»;::.;:.;:.::.::>:: ..;�.:::::�:::::�.:>�;�.;:.;::<.>::;:.:.:�:::;.:�.:�.::.;�.:;:;.::�: �.;�.:. 1��:.;::..::>��€��:r� � :::: �d'::�r�t��'. � .��€�:�::::�:� �::#�':�� :��:�� ::.;::..�::: �:.�.�.�::::.�:::.�::::::�:::�:::::::.:� ::::::::::::::�.::.�::::..:.:.............i�............ ............................. , ........... .... . #'..�,�,.��,(;:.T,:1#��':.f'#C��I:f:�#:".l.:;�!�#:::::�.��:Y; . .... .. .. . . . . . .. .. ��'� �� `��`.:i��: "': <::>:>.. �>;.«•: �.�. : ::� <: :::�:.:::>:::.;:;>•.:.:.;:.:;;::.::>:;:.»•:;:.::.;:::.>:.;::;:::;>: ....... :I��I:,��:::;�:��o��::>�Q::<��i:�::;':::�'::��... �r� :::::� .:::::::.::::::::::::.:. .::::. �:::::.� ::.:.::....:......................................................�......................... �`�:`:��.'�::;��`�`��»#��`��<��'�:� �:::��i�€��:::::k��<;�i��:��: :.> :.::::::::::.�9::::::::::::::.9:::::::: �.:: �.::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::............. :�;t; :��;:;:>��i`�:::::�Ii:��:�:'::��: ;,. , ........................::: �:�: ��:':::>; �:::i��:��:��'`��i�::::: �'�"��<;�`��€�ts::::�i?i"f�::.;:<��."<i� ::::::. .::::::::�.:� :::::::::::::::::�.:::::::::::��.:: �.:::::::::::.:..............:.........:....:........ :: ;:.;;•:.;::..;:.;:.;:::::::.: .. •• . �:e��r'ri��i��:�rt�€�r::::: .�:::>I.�LAt�;::�a:r'i��:::::�a��; :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: �:::::::::::::::::::......................:...:.... ` ;. >';��:��:��>� ��....�........� ............................. ��i�� .;;;:::.;::.:. ��'.:��€� .::...:.:....�...................... ..................................... Issue: Goal: = � � �-- ----� --= \_ • .: � :\ Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights Action Ste�s�. 1. Review previous MAC representations on issue with City Council. 2. Research nighttime flight restrictions imposed at other U.S. Airports. 3. Depending upon findings, prepare request to MAC for adoption of more stringent requirements. �4:: ��:K: :�•t: .+� �;: i?i;., •�.y.i;?.`,'`,iia:i:a.`i?�;�.,.ifl.' c:�: • t.'' �.'' :2'F1YiF:i:Fii%'��::ti:fd:�tF•.�; ;:7>�,t��s:��.,�.,.:.�.�::::::$.:.� �::,..�...`.::.��.� :::::::::::::�r:::::::::::'.�?.'. ....��. ;� ��`<`�'::::i:I��z:�`��`:';,>;,:.:.::: �: �<:::��:�:�C:'::':::'�� Ei�� :':�� ...:�:::.� :::::::::::::::::::: �.r.::�.::::::::::::: �::: �.::::::::...�.: ........... K.: ...............: ..,.::::: ��:::':��:y: :::::: �.��::::�'.<� �:�: � ��:::::��€::��:`�`��;°::<::��:��:::;. �> ::: � :;: :��.�::.;:::.::.�::�.�:::::::::.�.�::.�::::.�..:::::: �::�.::::::.�.�:::::�1::.�.:. �ir'��:�r'��:<�€�i'�'�: ��im�:::`�:��k�i��'i:�a: .::::::::�.::::: �:::::::�.:::� ....:...:.......:..:........................... �}�yY �s . .�...::/: .�:�:.:.;,::'��y1!"� yty /'y� �y : ;i:i:l�%�.t..=..a. ..::::if�(:�..:�:<:(�iii.: � �I.:F:>.:.'.•I•::::�.�'+�i4Y: '.., .x�.. .�..' : .:::::::: Y,.,�Y,.',.:::::,.,Y,.,4.;.:: �.:::::::::� .::::::::::::::::::::�:.�:: �t,.:.:::::. ' ) 3 � � � ►� • Staff/ARC Completed Staff/ARC Completed Staff/ARC Completed ��`::; .:.:.<::<:�:: �<..;,;<��:ri��i:l: �. � ........ �. ....... ...................... :.:; �� ..... �� €`.:�#�� .....��:.... � ............. .............................. , � � � �' � � � � � _: _. .. _ Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Produce and Distribute Informative Refrigerator Magnets Advertising the IVIAC Air Noise Complaint Line Action Ste�s�. 1. Investigate costs of magnet production and distribution. 2. Commission to review design. 3. Order delivered to City Hall 4. Magnets distributed to Council and ARC. 5o Commission to review final letter and news release. 6. Magnets distributed to residents 7. Additional magnets available at City Hall upon request. .:{Li..i...%..:.ii:::':Ynyy:•'iyY.::::4iitJ :.iii%.i:?:{..' .:::. .. ....................yi:L:{1..'niiiiii'i!+�'• �8�� `:<��t��: ��:�:::::. � �;;::rc;�:�.<. �::::��:::;��`i'i:�:tiiu�.: ::�.<:::�� :.:::;:: �:::::::�:::::::.�:::�c�.::::::::.� ..............................................�.... :>..>:.: ::.�:::::::: ..;�:..;;: :::..;:.:� :>::; ::.>:: :::: ;::.:: • .:::: :: ::.:::::: ::.:.x.::.;:.;:.::::.: :.>::::: : ��+�::::'��`��:�:�::::��::::��:::��:::;�:�::;: ::....;::.::�>,�:::.;::::;:.;;.:>.:;::..: :.::.:. �,:::<:.::,.;..:�.;::,.;:., ::..::.:;��:>:,,:.:;.::.;.:: :.:.::.:.;:::..::: :::. ��:;�;>:��::�:��:.��::;:��:�:<��.:.:��t� �� :::::m:��C��g:��: . . l- ? 4 Who Staff ARC Staff Staff Staff Staff When Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed ;:.:.;:.;:: :.:;:.;:..;.;;:�.::::::<>�.:: >:�� ::::::�; �. . . :�'�: � > � . .� � � ��':�� . . . . . . ........�... .. ...:�.. . .... �............ . �.. .��..��: ........... .............................. ....................... i r Issue: Goal: = i � � -� � � � � Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related Information �ctions Ste�s: 1. Expand mailing list for ARC agenda to include State Senators and Reps. 2. Mail letters to State Senators and Reps. Introducing ARC 3. Invite guests to monthly ARC meetings (i.e., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State elected officials) 4. Expand coverage of air noise issues. r.:::;:::�:ry;::::::::::;:::.;::: , �q:.::: ?y:::.:sw.::::•.:>:avr.:;:: ;..a:r.:::: x.>:::.:;:: :�:k: :��:�t�:�:�_:<�.��'�:::: �. � < �:;��:;��.:.:��;.:�� .:::::: :::...:..:...:.....:....:.........:...:...�... � . . . ��;:::::�:�:.::��x�:::::��r�:�� J�1yy ::.::j.:':�:.y:�..,,x{�:.:.:�::�:..�:.;:y�.+.:::::.:.�;.I,.y�:::;:,��y:1:�:{::<:.::.::. :::.:..::: :> ::::.::�i:.y::.:::: ::�::y.:}{::::y::�.:,(:�.:y:y:.:!::.:: :..:=y.�,{: �3.;J;F. ��i;IC�M,.!�:�^�;T::ti�::•:::::•-•��:i: 'A�•,,.��K;::ti�i'f;[�Q.'.4,7,.T�:y::�T: :4..•i:.Y.::•�i:?.::��':.:::..:•:::�. '. '.: . ..::::� V 3y G{;�'V Y:.�C::U:I:;t;�'.i ... � 1....�'. .r.'..:3 � V,,.��. . �.: : . �.. � : : : �. c: : : : : : ;�; �..�'.� ...: : : : : : : : : : : . : . : : . . . . : : . . . : . . . . . : . . . . . . : : ��Y: :.;•.::.::::.x ::..:.::::::::X:;•..>::,::s•::.;•.:,:::�<:.::;:::..x.;•.;:.;::.::, .;•::: :.:<.;:.;•:.�::<.:::.;...: '�;.:; :�'��rtii� � . ::::��::>:�� . :::::��:�� < ��4�:`:::�t��:: .::::::::::::::::::�::::::::::::::::::::�....::.......�.:..........:............ . � � 5 Who When x � : >:::.;:.: �;: : �: :.: Staff �t��i;��:rc��€� Staff Continuous Staff Continuous :�..��:I��: Staff Continuous :�:: �<:.:<�;:.:`.��;..:; . :::,:.;. : ��. �: � � :. : ...�........ .. •:.� �.:::: • ::::::::............... � :..::.::.:.:.:::::.;::::.::::::::..:: �� :� : ��. �: �� :..::::::: � :��. �� ...............�.......... � .: :��:��`.:�� . . � ........... . �........ ... � .............................. i I �. i S ' ' � � � �' issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Commission Action Steos• 1. Review current distribution of MAC Commissioners with ARC 2. Prepare letter to gubernatorial candidates asking for their position on MSP expansion, corridor use, MAC representation 3. Discuss City concerns with our current MAC representative 4. Monitor gubernatorial election . �:,:;:::>:>:.<>:;.;;�•�:::<;:;:;�.;: ::::::::::::::::.:::::.:::..x:... ;��r' :��5��:.��...�.`>::��'I:��i:.`•..C:k�`::<:'St!%i:�.�::::�:�$��%'s:>��[��`� ::.::. . . . .. . . ... ::�iiii 1■i::.t:n}i:{[iY'^:i':ii:::::}::(y:::�i�.{'.:�ry,,"}}.,,K}:i'.};�:':�J::•;:i•:•:V i:; .........r... ... . . ..................... �S;aY:::::��..��Y:��• �.:��1�. � ::i:•Y•�� ..:.Y.•.�'�.,,i�:Y{�I:iiti�;;: ...:................�....:.........�.........:....�...............�..........:.....:.:........... :�'�' 7. Review MASAC representation and MAC representation with Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Commission. r' � 6 �. Who When Staff Completed Staff Completed �� ARC/Staff Completed Completed Issue: Goal: � i �-_ ` �: � : � �_ MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Prevent Construction of Third North Parallel Runway �4ction Steus° Who 1. Update Commission on status of Staff MSP LTCP Study 2. Continue participation on MSP Staff Technical Working Committee 3. Respond to public comment Council/ request Draft Alternative ARC Environmental Document for MSP 4. Retain experts to assist in efforts Council to prevent the designation of the third north parallel runway as the preferred IVISP expansion alternative 5. Respond to public comment request Council/ to Final Alternative Environmental ARC Document for MSP .::.::;::.:�.x::;.;::.:: � . :� ��;:.;:: . > ;>.�:: . �� :.:: : :: : ;,� ; � .::.�...� � � � � �. :;;;�:�:..i:�� . : :;:. : .: ,::.::;..:>:.>:: ::<:::.; :.:::;;:.::: .::.;�.;:�;:.;.;:.;::.>::::.: ............ .. :..`.::'">�i� . . : .... . :�i:t: :��':��:;::<��:��:::�us�i��::'::�:�i��:::>�.��;;�.::::::;�°.:::::: �:::::::. :::: �� .::::.::::::::::::::. ....... ;:::�:...;:;;`:::��ii�:�::;'`'�r�°��1<�'�'�€r��':: ...... �:::::..�.�....: � :::::::::::::�.:::: .:$!.:::..::.....................'�: 7. Pursue MAC contract on the prohibition of third parallel runway as per 1996 Dual Track legislation. 7 ( j When Completed Compieted Completed Not Applicable Completed � Issue: Goal: � i ► � � � . ,� � � ' Conversion to Stage Iil Quieter Aircraft Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000 Action Ste�s�. 1. Review NWA obligations to MAC regarding Stage II phaseout and research fleet mix at various airports around the country 2. Prepare letter to MAC regarding ongoing contract talks with NWA to request inclusion of language specifying phase out date 3. Work with MAC Commissioners who are supportive of effort to help build consensus amongst MAC 4. Letter to NWA asking for their cooperation in committing to Year 2000 phaseout 5. Prepare media news releases and information letters explaining issue and asking for letters and/or calls to MAC in support of contractual language. 8 Who �Nhen Staff/ARC Completed Staff Completed Staff%ARC Completed Staff Completed Staff Completed � ■ L� � � � � � Issue: Noise Reduction Through Litigation Goal: Determine Feasibility of a �egal Challenge to Current Air Noise Distribution Action Stens: W1�4 When 1. Review history of legal challenges Staff/ARC Completed related to air noise � �;t: Investigate FAA procedures in effect at time of 1973 corridor decision - Freedom of Information Act request? ��:;.:::.;:�.x.::;;<;>;�.:.:>�::.:�:: :.. .. ;�::;'�,:� ��:r .>::. ��:>::�:::.:.;.�::,.>:.,>:....;;:: .;:.�;.':`.'.:��::;�:�:::�:��% ..�::�::::::: �:: �.:::::::: �:::::��:�: �#.:�� ............................... ,.:.,:.:::.:X.:;,� ::::...:.::.:::.....:..:... x ��irri�r��:�:::>:<�;��`:::��I:: :p��E��e ...................................................... . . . . . ' ) 9 Staff Completed �: `'°�'.:�� ....��:....� ............. .............................. ; r' �) :,G:l�' '� • ;_ •� Issue: Assure Installation of Sound Insulation in Schools Affected by Air Noise Exposure Goal: Air Noise Mitigation Through Sound Insulation Action Ste�sz 1. Meet with school administrators to discuss need 2. Analyze MAC School Noise Monitoring Study 3. Continue to monitor changes in the Ldn contours and monitor the Part 150 Sound Insulation program completion process. ...� .......:...:.:: ::>..:x: �:��`��::..; ::.:....::.:.�;..;::,::�€:.� .'<�:�;::;�#<::�'�:.;�`:`:>:<'�<�`��: ...... ::.:..:........:::::::�.��.:::��::: �#::::::::::::.�:::�..�:�..�::.�:::� �::>`::r�`<:��€�>:� � :;`�:i��r��:�:'�f.�l:�:�:'::::I�I:i�'��"�:�i�e� .....�...::::::::: �.::.�:::::.�:::::::::.� :::::::::::::::::::::�.::::.�:.�::::: ......�,v:' G'••::. � �....`.�`.`'.t.'.?E]i�R3i�'t�4�;x; r" � 10 Who Staff When Completed Staff/ARC Completed Staff/ARC C AG E N DA � � METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL Generai Meetinq June 25, 1996 7:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Ntinnesota 1. Call to Order, Roll Cail � 2. Approvai of Minutes of Meeting May 28, 1996 3. Introduction of Invited Guests Receipt of Communications � 4. Technical Advisor's Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary 5. Update: Part 150 Sound Insulation Program by Steve Vecchi 5. Presentation: NADP Recommendation 6. Repo�t of the MAC June Commission Meeting 7. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 8. Other Items Not on the Agenda 9. Adjoumment Next Meeting: July 23, 1996 r.Note ` On;ly des�gnaked MASAC < `:: representatroes seate,d; ai fhe;table :will be, '. ;: allowed ta vofe: 1 MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING May 28, 1996 7:30 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota Call to Order Roll Call The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and the secretary was asked to call the roll. The foilowing members were in attendance: Mark Saimen Jennifer Sayre Brian Bates Mike Geyer Chuck Curry Bob Johnson John Smith Dick Keinz Jim Serrin Joe Lee Carol McGuire Tom Hueg Jamie Verbrugge John Nelson � Vern Wilcox Tom Egan Mike Schlax Lance Staricha Jill Smith Ed Porter Dale Hammons Manny Camilon Associate Member - Sunfish Lake Advisors Ron Crabill Cindy Greene Ron Glaub Traci Erickson Visitors Neil Clark Northwest Northwest Airborne UPS A�PA M BAA Mpls. CC MAC Minneapolis Minneapolis St. Paul St. Paul Richfield Bloomington Bloomington Eagan Eagan Eagan Mendota Heights Burnsville Inver Grove Heights St. Louis Park Dan Licht FAA • FAA FAA-CMO Acting Technical Advisor SMAAC C. � � 2. Approval of Minutes The minutes of the April 23, 1996 meeting were approved as presented. 3. Introduction of Invited Guests Receipt of Communication No invited guests. No lette�s of communication. Cindy Greene, FAA-ATC, introduced Ron Crabill who is the new Assistant Manager replacing Denis Cornell. Mr. Crabill will serve in an advisory capacity to MASAC. 4. Technical Advisor's Runwav Svstem Utilization Report and Complaint SummaN Traci Erickson, substituted for John Foggia who is attending the 1996 Environmental System Research Institute Conference in California. Ms. Erickson reported the following: Due to a series of ANOMS radar-reading software-and hardware failures during April 1996, a complete May Technical Adviso�'s Report was impossible to produce. A copy of the memo addressed to MASAC detailing the technical problems is attached to the minutes. Mike Schlax, Eagan, commented that the use of Stage 3 aircraft at MSP has actually 'flatlined" and Eagan residents are concerned. He asked if there is anything the airlines can do to insure routing of more Stage 3 aircraft through MSP when building thei.r schedules? Jennifer Sayre responded that NWA has been steadily increasing Stage 3 operations (currently up to 55.5%). There was also a problem identified in some of the reporting of the DC9 hush kitting which is now back on track. According to the NWA Financing Agreement, the airline cannot have less Stage 3 operating than last year. Chairman Johnson suggested forwarding these comments to staff, who are now in the pracess of expediting the NNMM. Mr. Schlax, Eagan, reiterated disappointment in the Corridor compliance issues that are on- going. Compliance percentages have been steadily regressing back to Fall 1995 levels. Cindy Greene, FAA ATC responded that the Tower has not changed any procedures - emphasis is still stressed on Corridor compliance. 5. Operations Committee Report: NADPs The Operations Committee met May 24, 1996, to reach a final recommendation,on the Noise Abatement Depa�ure Profiles (NADPs). A copy of the minutes for this meeting were distributed to all members. and reviewed by Operations Committee Chairman, Mark Salmen. Please review and refer to the attached Operations Committee minutes. ( ) Page 2 Chairman Salmen presented an overview of: - Distant Departure Procedures - Ciose-in Departure Procedures - Combination Departure Procedures - DNL Contours: Distant/Close-in Procedures - DNL Contours: Combined Distant/Close-in Procedures As requested in the Operations Committee, the implementation schedule of the NADP is as follows: - MASAC approval - MAC Planning and Environment Committee - MAC Full Commission - Northwest Airlines 30-day procedure implementation - National Oceanic Service (NOS) 56-day charting cycle - Airlines begin using the procedure ANOMS will continue to monitor and assess differences between the Distant and Close-in procedures. ANOMS data is explicit enough to ascertain impacts. The cities' of Eagan, Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights expressed their doubts on the NADP recommendation, and questioned staff. John Nelson, Bloomington, conveyed that the information relayed at this meeting should be brought back to the respective communities for review and decision, and brought to vote at the June MASAC meeting. In one year after implementation of the NADP procedure, it should be re-analyzed and reported to MASAC. MASAC members concurred. � Chuck Curry, ALPA, relayed the background and history of the NADPs. John Nelson, Bloominqton moved and Joe Lee Minneapolis seconded to postpone the NADP recommendation bv the Operations Committee until the June MASAC meeting. A vote was taken and unanimouslv passed. 6. Report of the MAC Mav Commission Meeting Chairman Johnson reported: New Commissioner Ca�l M. D'Aquila of Hibbing, MN, replaced Laurel Erickson. MSP has the largest enplanement on charter flights over any airport in the U.S. Congressman Oberstar addressed the Commission to discuss critical issues in Washington relative to airport funding. Page 3 ` 7. ' Persons Wishinq to Address the Council Mr. Neil Ciark, a member of SMAAC, disputed the newspaper articie facts on "Property Values i in Minneapolis are on the Rebound", which was attached to the MASAC package. 8. Other Items Not on the Aqenda A discussion took place regarding not enclosing "personal" convictions by MASAC members or staff, in the monthly MASAC package. All "Mitigation Committee" information and developments will be forwarded to MASAC. 9. Adjournment Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Jean Deighton, Secretary � Page 4 �� MINUT.ES MASAC OPERATIONS COMMITfEE May 24, 1996 The meeting was held at the Metropolitan Airports Commission General O�ce Lobby Conference Room, and called to order at 10:05 a.m. The following mem6ers were in attendance: Mark Salmen, NWA - Chairman Bob Johnson - MBAA Chuck Curry - ALPA Dick Keinz - MAC John Nelson - Bloomington ° Kevin Batchelde� - Mendota Heights Jon Hohenstein - Eagan (Mike Schlax - Eagan) � Advisorv: Roy Fuhrmann - MAC Pat Karsten - FAA Ron Glaub - FAA Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADPs) / t The report package distributed at the meeting is an integral part of the meeting information and is attached to the minutes: ° MSP - 1994 POPULATION COUNTS - Distant Departure Procedures - Close-in Departure Procedures with identical first segment - Combination Departure Procedures with identical first segment (Close-in off Runways 29L/R and Distant off all other runways) • DNL Contours: Distant/Close-in Procedures ° DNL Contou�s: Combined Distant/Close-in Procedures Chairman Salmen reviewed the Distant and Close-in departure profiles. Points of importance included: Distant NADP: • The first 1000 feet of climb is the same as the Close-in procedure. • At 1000 feet AGL (approximately .75 mile from the runway end) - aircraft noise is lowered - rate of climb is reduced - aircraft accelerates r , - flaps retracted on schedule • Upon clean up of aircraft (appraximately 2.8 miles from, runway end) - reduce thrust to quiet EPR - maintain VZF - continue climb ' . • Upon reaching 3000 Feet AGL (normally 6'/Z to 7'/z from runway end) - apply climb thrust - accelerate to 250 knots - continue climb as per ATC, clearance a CLOSE-IN NADP: . • The first 1000 feet of climb is the same as the distant NADP. • At 1000 feet AGL (approximately .75 mile from runway end) - reduce thrust to climb thrust - adjust pitch to maintain V2 + 10 knots (slight nose down) • Aircraft will climb at a steeper angle, but requires more power to maintain appropriate airspeed • At 3000 feet AGL (approximately 9 miles from runway end) - - lower nose of aircraft to accelerate l` �' - retract flaps on schedule as aircraft accelerates - upon clean-up of aircraft, accelerate to 250 knots - continue climb as per ATC clearance DISTANT VS. CLOSE-IN NADP: • Both procedures produce the same profile from beginning of takeoff roll to 1000 feet AGL. • At 1000 feet AGL, the Close-in NADP and Distant NADP start to differ: Close-in Even though thrust is reduced to "climb th�ust", an airspeed of VZ + 10 knots is maintained. Flaps remain extended at takeoff setting. Aircraft climbs at a steeper angle, but requires more power (climb thrust) to maintain airspeed. � Dis n Aircraft nose is lowered. As aiccraft accelerates, flaps are retracted on schedule. � �; When flaps are up, thrust is reduced to "quiet thrusY', and aircraft pitch adjusted to maintain appropriate �airspeed (VZF). AT 3000 FEET AGL Close-in �3 - Nose of aircraft is lowered to allow acceleration of aircraft Flaps retracted as aircraft accelerates After aircraft is cleaned up, accelerate to 250 knots and climb on schedule Apply climb thrust Accelerate to 250 knots Climb on schedule Based on manufacturer's data and performance engineer's calculations, the profiles on flex th�ust and full thrust are essentially the same. The information stated above is reflected in the DNL contours. From the final NADP analysis which included validation of each procedure by aircraft type, Chairman Salmen stated that the best overall recommendation is the Close-in departure off Runway 29L/R, and Distant departure off all other runways. Population analysis�for DNL 60, 65, 70, and 75 by community was analyzed for the Distant and Clase-in departure profiles. The number of dwellings do coincide with the population count. Chairman Salmen relayed that the analysis shows the Close-in procedure is best for Runways 29L/R and the Distant procedure minimizes total population inside the contours on all other runways. Jon Hohenstein, Eagan, relayed that he felt testing of the profiles should be done. Roy Furhrmann reiterated that ANOMS will continue to monitor and assess differences between the Distant and the Close-in procedure. ANOMS data is explicit enough to ascertain impacts. Ron Glaub, FAA, mentioned there may be a problem with mixing procedures on parallel runways. Roy Fuhrmann responded that staff will inquire into other airports using mixed procedures. Bob_Johnson. MBAA, moved and Charles c'urrv ALPA seconded to recommend to MASAC the "Dis nt Gommunitv Deoarture Profile° �t�1��at�nn on R�nwayG 11 L/R and Runways 4/22 and the '�ose-in Communitv De�arture Profile" utilization on Runwa G 29L/R A vote was taken and pdSSed by a ma� rity r_ ulg__(�-Y •-�2 na�[,L John Nelson, Bloomington, voted yes contingent upon staff supplying multiplication factors used to determine population and dwelling counts for the respective communities. MAC staff in conjunction with HNTB, will make this determination and report findings at MASAC on May 28, 1996. � John Nelson also asked staff to present an implementation time line to MASAC, and continue pressing forward on the issue. � i The meeting was adjourned at 11:10 a.m. Respectfully submitted: Jean Deighton Committee Secretary 4 C�-� ,; Metropolitan Aircraff Sound Abatement Council �MASAC) 6040 28th Avenue South • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55450 •(612) 726-9411 Chairman: Robert P. Johnson Past Chairs: Scott Bunin, 1990-1995 Walter Rockensteln, II, 1982-1990 Jan Del Calzo, 1979-1982 Stanley W. Olson, 1969-1979 Technical Advisor; John Foggia To: FROM: SUBJECZ: DA'TE: Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (NiASAC) John Foggia, Technical Advisor - April, 1996 Technical Advisor's Report May 28, 1996 Due to a series of ANOMS radar-reading software and hardware failures during April 1996, a complete Technical Advisor's Report was impossible to produce. Early in April, Traci Faickson, Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs (ANSP) ANOMS Specialist, was notif'ied by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) tower personnel that the Z'I�ACOR radar diskpack reader had malfuncti.oned. Traci conta.cted TRACOR, uutiating the maintenance process. Initial analysis indicated "routine" maintenance was necessary.Additionally, during FAA's move into the new tower facility, diskpack reader cables and tape read heads sustained dama�e. TRACOR performed on-site inaintenance, but nearly the entire month of flight tracks were wnrecoverable. During this downtime, TRACOR upgraded ARTS interface software, and Traci altered ANOMS importing routines. All maintenance issues are now resolved, and complete, accurate flight track data. is expected after May 15, 1996: This incident l�righlights the program's dependence on radar da.ta. Not oniy are operations counts unpossible without flight tracking information, but the various noise analyses are also impossible to complete because each one requires flight track correlation. ANSP staff are currently investigating "direct connect" options for radar data retrieval. This system is more reliable than diskpack readers, less labor-intensive for FAA personnel, and designed to accommodate the anticipated changes in ARTS software, e�cpected over the next five years. We apologize for this Technical Advisor's Report inconvenience, and thank you in advance for your cooperation. C RECYCLED PAPER i %////%/,_ ;� ( « C . _. ...... ....... . ....._........ ....... ._.... ..._. .._.. ....... ._.._.. ... _. � � % �r� Minneapolis / St. Paul International Airport =�....�, ..:::;�•�� . MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolrtan Airport Sound Abatement Council �( � ,. , .A�T�,'', cha;,,nan ,�� a �on�ao w�� c�t.,,�,�: sco« Etm;n Technical Advi.tor: John Fog�ia secretary: Jmn DdgJdm Airbame Ezp�rra: s� ae�tl AirTmnrporl Asraeiation: raw nt�c,n.. ncan: Chndes W. Curry Jn ciry cfelaomi,r,qron: Pet�ooa Lee vern w'�co: City cf Bimttville: r� ��, ctty cf Easan Tom Egrm c;ry �t,� c� y��8nu: nele a�mm, City afMendotaHeightr: 7iU 9mi W Ciy cfMinneapalia: Jemes B.9errin 1� ta�,e�. J« Lce Jodit6 Dodge City cf Riehfield: ceorge ICamae Dov Priebe c;ry �sr. c.o�;., ra.;t: x� nd�.. crry �sr. Pa,�: smn a� c,� c. w�,a� ce� a� rt�c� Ddfa Air Linu Inc.: . xt� �cawd� Fedeml Fiprc.ct: Tom Rhdnedc FedernlAviation Admini.rtmliom Bruae Wngmer Romld Glaab MAC Sm¢.• Didc Keins MBAA: Rot�crt P. Johnsm Muakr Nortlovvl Airlink: Lawrmce McCabe Metropalitan Airportr Commistion: Commiedmc Alton Ga�{m MN Air Natiand Guard: Mnjoe hfork R N�s Northwut Airline.r: �rt smmm ��r� s�ro sr. t�,r c�.�c��: IadcBoetley Sun Country Airlinu: Lake A. Gomes United Airlircs [rr.: Allen Tomllneon United Porcef Service: 9teve Wallcer - Pe�y HDLnan US. Air Foiee Ruerve: - Captain Stevm Chspman US. Supplemental Carriers: xot� a rwc �n Airpor�s Com Metropolitan Airports Commission Declaration of Purposes l.) Promote public welfare and national security; serve public interest, com�enience, and necessiry; promote air navigation and transportarion, international, national, state, and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, safe, and economical handling of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in national and international programs of air transportation; and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the metropolitan area in this state as an aviation center, and to correlate that area with all aviadon facilities in the entire state so as to provide for the most economical and effective use af aeronautic facilities and services in that azea; 2.) Assure the residents of the metropolitan area of the minimum environmental impact from air navigation and transportation, and to that end prwide for noise abatement, control of airport a�ea land use, and other protective measures; and 3.) Promote the werall goals of the state's emironmental policies and minimize the public's eacposure to noise and safery hazards around airports. Metropolitan AircraFt Sound Abatement Council Statement of Purpose This corporation was formed in furtherance of the general welfare of the communities adjoining Mirmeapolis-St Paul Internadonal Airport - Wold-Chamberlain Field, a public airport in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, through the alleviation of the problems created by the sound of aircraft using the airport; tluough study and evaluadon o� a continuing basis af the problem and af suggesdon far the alleviation of the same; thraugh initiation, coordination and promotion of reasonable and effective procedures, conirol and regulations, consistent with the safe operadon of the airport and of aircraft using the same; and through dissemination of infarmation to the affected communities, their affected residents, and the users of the airport respe�ting the problem of aireraft noise rnusance and in respect to suggestions made and actions initiated and taken to alleviate the groblem. Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council Representation The mem.bership shall include representatives appointed by agencies, corporations, associations and grnernmental bodies which by reas� of their statutory authority and responsibility or control wer the airpart, or by reason of their status as airport usess. have a direct interest in the operatian of the airport. Such members will be called User Representatives and Public Representatives, pravided that the User Representatives and Public Representatives shall at all times be equal in number. The Airport 24-hour Noise Hotline is 726-9411. Complaints to the hotline do rtot result in changes in Airpon activiry, but provides a public sounding board and airport informafion outlet The hotline is staffed 24-hours Monday - Friday Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs This report is prepared and printed in house by Traci Frickson. ANOMS Specialist Questions or comments may be directed to: MAC - Aviation Noise Rc Satellite Program Minneapolis / S� Paul International Airport 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 Tel: (612) 725-6331, Fax: (612) 725-6310 ANSP Home Page: http://www.macavsatorg _-r: _ Operations and Complaint 5ummary 1 Operations Sumrnary - All Aircraff .....................................................................................1 MSP May Fleet Mi.�c Percenta.ge ..........................................................................................1 Airport May Complaint Summary .......................................................................................1 May Operations Summary - Airport Directors Office .........................................................1 l�linneapolis - St. Paullnternational Airport Complaant Summary 2 ComplaintSummary by City ...............................................................................................2 Available Time for Ilunway Use 3 TowerLog Reports - All Hours ...................................................:.......................................3 Tower Log Reports - Nighttime Hours ................................................................................3 .AllOperaiions 4 RunwayUse Report May 1996 ............................................................................................4 Carrier Jet Operations 5 RunwayUse Report May 1996 ............................................................................................5 Nighttime - All Operations 6 0 RunwayUse Report May 1996 ............................................................................................6 Naghttime Carrier Jet Operations 7 RunwayUse Report May 1996 ...........:................................................................................7 Carrier Jet Operations by Type 8 Aircraft Identi, fier and Description Table 9 Runway Use - Day/Naght Per�iods � All Operations 10 DaytimeHours ...............:...................................................................................................10 Community Overflight Analysas 11 , �-� � � ;�arrier;Jet�Operations - All Hours .....................................................................................11 � � �� Carner Jet erattons - Ni ttune 11 m- 6 am .: .11 _ :;; �� . , ( .............. .. . ... _ , � �M,��;� � � � _ p � � >;'�.. � , � � .�� .. _ �:r ; f �r..u�6�. r �+�'�'.ry_�, .. _. ... ... . ��...t .: � ' M I ' I �, , - Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs , , I Remote 1Vdonatoring ,�ite Locaiions 12 Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events 13 ; , , Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT .....................................................13 Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events 14 Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ................................................14 Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identi, fied 15 Ten Loudest Aarcraft Noise Events Identi, fred 16 Ten Loudest Aircraft Noase Events Identi, f'ied 17 Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identifzed' 18 Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified 19 Ten Loudest Aarcraft Noise Events Identified 20 Flight Track Base Map 21 Aarport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 22 Carrier Jet Operations - May 1996 ....................................................................................22 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring 5ystem Flight Tracks 23 Carrier 7et Operations - May 1996 ....................................................................................23 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight �'racks 24 Carrier Jet Operations - May 1996 ...............................................................................:... 24 Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 25 Carrier Jet Operations - May 1996 ................................................................................... 25 Airport Noise;;:and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks Camer' � 7et''Operations - May 1996 .................................. :�;��; Analysis of A�ir��cft Noise Events - Aircraft Ldn dB(A) 2� �, u , • ....�.. ,. ... -rr 7'�t .r'�, ��.. �� ...:: � -:��,- ..,.:;: �� .� :; Anal..ysi.� o�,.�:}��'4x �� t.N�ise.:.'��ents - Aircraft Ldn dB(A) 2� ' .. Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs � .... 26 Melropolitan Airports Commission Operations and. Complaint Sumrr�ary May 1996 Operations Summary - All Aircraft Note: Seven Davs of ARTS Data MissinQ 04 128 0.9% 46 22 46 0.3% 97 11 9141 63.5% 8478 29 5073 35.3% 4520 MSP May Fleet Mix Percentage 0.4% 0.7% 64.5% 34.4% �' ,�:� . '� ,. ._ _ Airport May Complaint Summary May Operations Summary - Airport Directors Office Air Carrier 773 787 Commuter 291 316 G�A„��; �135 148 ,. �4. �Y(��"�o�� 8 1� Air F'�ei�t�,�� 42 39 C�%�r1�ir�� 9 , 32 � �,�E�., Aviati� Noise Fc Satellite Programs � Page l. Metropolitan Airports Comm.ission , 1Vlinneap+�lis - St. Paul r` ) � �, ��f 7�✓l��i� � F.' r � ' wg t, Page 2 International Airpoa-t May 1996 Complaint Summary by City Complaint Summary >::>::>::>::>::>::::>:::::>::::»::>::»::>::>::>::>::>::>::::::>::»::>::::>::::::»::>::>::>::>::<:<:;::::: :::::>:>:»:: :;::::::>.:;»,:;::::;:<��::<:>::::::>::::;>::��>:::::::::>;:<:::>::>::::>::::>:€::::;<:_<:> <:::::::;�:::::::;:;:< ::::::::::::::�><:::::>::::;;:>::::::::::>:<�»::>::>>::::>::::::::::::>:>:>::::::::::::::::>: <::::>:::::>::>:::::::: <:::: � >::>::::::»::;::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ::::>::::::::>:< :::::::::::::::>><:::;<:�:;:»:::��;':>:€:':::>::>:�>:?::�>��:<�::::<:;::::::>::::::>::.::>>;?::»:'�:r��:� ;:;<::>:::::: ::<:::: > :.. ...._.. :.... .....:::::>;::::::::::::>::::::>� :<::;>::>:::::>: :>::> .... .. .:.. ..., :.. . :...:<:: ::::.:�:.�:.::::::::.�:::.:�:: .. .:::: �:.;>:;:;.: :.::.;�%part�€�e�.:::: ::.�:::::::'�'�.#� ::::::::::: .::.�'e�en� � : .::::�.::::: Apple Valley 4 8 12 1.1% Arden Hills 0 2 2 0.1% Afton 1 0 1 0.1% Bloomington 0 5 5 0.4% Burnsville 0 7 7 0.7% Eagan 19 129 148 14.5% Eden Prairie 1 1 2 0.1% Frlina 0 16 16 1.6% Falcon Heights 1 0 1 0.1% Inver Grove Heights 4 192 196 19.2% Lake Elmo 0 1 1 0.1% Medina 0 1 1 0.1% Mendota Heights 0 74 74 7.2% Minneapolis 181 297 478 46.8% Mounds V'iew 0 1 1 0.1% Plymouth 1 0 1 0.1% Richfield 1 28 29 2.8% Roseville 0 1 1 0.1% South St. Paul 0 10 10 0.9% St. Anthony Village 0 1 1 0.1% St. Louis Park 16 2 18 1.8% St. Paul 10 6 16 1.6% Sunfish Lake 0 4 4 0.4% ::::;:; �<` �:=':::3�`:<>>;>:::: ;>::;«::;:::::<�':� <>`::::::::::>:'�::::: :::::':::::>:::::;<:>::>�� ``�� .}'::>::::::::;?»:::>: :::::::>:`::::>::>:€:::;::<:;:;; :.`}.:::s::>>::><>:: :::::r><:>:;>:::;::� `' ��. `"�:: <:>':::`::::':>::`:': ::::::::>':>':::::>�`'' �`'�: `>; �'� �:<::::>::>�:>��: :::::i:i$i::i:i:ii:i:::::i:i:i :::::;:::::::::::::::::ii:::: �},� [� [�� ;i:2i::;i:i:::;i::::i::::::i:i :......:.::...:�.....::::::.::::::::::::.::.::::::.:::::::::::.�.�::::::::.�::: .............�QFl.::::::.�::.� .:::::::::::.�R��:::::.�.�::.::::::::::.�1�T�.:::::::::. Time of Day Nature of Complaint Aviati� Noise &. Satellite Programs ' Available Time for Runway Use Tower Log Reports - May.1996 All Hours ::::::>: Q: °�'e�::::; ;;.;. w � � ``�::: '.i:.:::>��:�y;. ............... .............. .............. ;%:�:�� i::it�i�i:F�?i'i:i:'it:j: t:• ``::':�;��4;`>. V'= Nighttime FIours ::>>:`:.t�'�v:'';;; ��.:::::::::°:�> �� Metropolitan Airports Commission '�•`:i;+ �� f :�i::;�',��,4i:�:�:. : �4 �o� : ::; :>:::::;::.:::>::: `':::>;'��:<�� . :::<:�:°��::. � ��:'>; �::::::�:�;�::. ,� „ '.r� t�}m ' �isy., i;��i�:t�fi�iFik• ,:v::...,,a�F.�:.,....��7.;m'7f.+'s� . , _ .._. .._. .�,� t �4i 4 i .� �?'�ifi.�t�1. aTr �c ,_ � f . . , �t � r`:t � ��Y �� as,h �� ? ..�.u.>.:....�.�-�.. ..,Fu:�. J.sN��.,�i.�.:u.�� k� � � i ��41 �''�� 1 � 7 Y ?� � : 1� ,� c � ��t �: �.�, , ti y � �, d � . .�. (Co- ey'�,�' ti1L::� .,x�{��'�s, .,r }1 .. '- a;:��i,..c�:s� �u� _. ._ ,.a'.. i .. . . Aviation Noise 8c Satellite Programs Page 3 r'� Metropolitan Airports Commission All Operations Runway �Tse Report May 19 6 >::»:'::�:�::fl'a 04 11L 11R 22 29L 29R 128 4286 4855 46 2945 2128 46 4172 4306 97 2740 1780 0.9% 29.8% 33.7% 0.3% 20.5% 14.8% 0.4% 31.7% 32.8% 0.7% 20.9% Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Page 4 Aviatian Noise Fc Sabellite Programs 185 3021 2626 29 3278 2900 16 3090 2942 245 2981 2773 1.5% 25.1% 21.$% 0.3% 27.2% 24.1% 0.1% 25.7% 24.5% 2.0% 24.7% 23.0% Metropolitan Airports Commissian Carrier Jet Operations R.unway Use Report May 19 6 >:::>::::>:�:'�1:�`� 23 2783 2995 0 1945 11�5 0.2% 31.2% 33.6% 0.0% 21.8% 13.2% 0.0% 30.9% 35.0% 0.2% 23.1% 10.8% Note: Seven I�ays of ARTS Data Missing Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs 1.4% 27.5% 19.4% 0.2% 27.0% 24.5% 0.0% 26.8% 24.4% 2.2% 24.6% 22.0% Page 5 C� C r Metropolitan Airports Commission Nighttime - All Operations Runway Use Report May 19 6 >:>::>:�;1:�;:.��' Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Page 6 Aviatio� Noise � Satellitie Programs C C ' _. Metropolitan Airports Commission Nighttime Carrier Jet Uperations Runway Use Report May 19 6 :::>:::>�:��: Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 7 Cw C C Metropolitan Airports Commission Page 8 Carrier Jet Operations by T'ype May 1996 ::::::::�::.:::.r�:i�y:::::{:;y::i+:�::::::�:::<;:; <::::::::::;: .L �y �ap�y��a L� � �1q.� :i:.�':::''�.�le_2:iS:::ttti:t titt:i�.�..::t%k..4Xt7kii�kE..�.�.3v?': c :;Si::t::i' i:vs5i::::: i:;iiiCSC�;T14;#Gi;S�;�i:�Y��'�:::::i :iiiii:iiii;:::�.:.�:::::::.:::;;;;> .>:t� :::::::::::.:�:::::.t�t..�::: B727H 188 l.l% � B733/4/5 505 3.0% B747 109 0.7% B74F 4 0.0% B757 1500 8.8% B767 . 1 0.0% CL65 234 1.4% DC 10 798 4.7% DC87 65 0.4% DC9H 1899 11.2% EA31 20 0.1% EA32 1566 9.2% FK10 702 4.1% L1011- 1 0.0% MD11 23 0.1% NID80 773 4.6% BA10 9 0.1% BAl l 2 0.0% B727 2169 12.8% B737 1132 6.7% DC8 59 0.3% DC9 5220 30.7% FK28 1 0.0% �� i�� Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Aviatioai Noise &c Satellite Programs 49.4% Stage III 50.6% Stage II l � (. C Metropolitan Airports Commission Aircraft Identifier and l�escriptionTable ::::::>::::::>::::w:::::<:::: :::::::: :::: :::::>:::::::::::::::::>;:::::::::::>:::;>::>:::::>:::»::: ::>::::::::>::::>;»::::: ::>:::>:::::::: :.::.::.::.::.>:»::: � :>::.: :.:::.::: < :::.::.: :: � :::.::.::.::::.::.::::.:>::.:: ::: : ::.: :.: :.: :.::.:;:.: :.::.>:.::.:: ::.:: � :.: :.:::.::::.::::: <.::.: :.::.: :.::.:.:::.: :.: :.>:.::. .:::.:: ::::::.::::::::>.:::;::::::>::::::::»: ::>::>::;::>:::>:::»::>:::»::»::::: �::>::>::::::>:::::::::>:::>:::::::::::>::>::::>::::>:: �:>�::::::� :::::::<:: :..::::::.:.::: .... . iiiii. :'. :'..... K . ... .::::. ::::::n�.i': :..i:n:iiiiiii:{.iiii:niiiii:::vi:ii�:::::.�:.�:::::::::. :■�fyj�1s� . �.(..: .. �y (,/{� ::Y.C::: ' : ' ' : . ::':::•: �: ::::•:::::::v::::•:::•:::•:::•:::':•i:'iiin:::::•:::'ji:•:•:::•:i::::::•::::i:::•i:•:•:•ii:'i:•:::•::::i:i::::•::i : 'i.{'•7iR: f[i�6i:�4� ' .�%Ri�7�::•:::::•:::•:v::•:::•:::'r :•,:•i:::::::::f:X:i:':':::::::•::::::::i:::•:•:::::•:::•:::•:':::'i:'i:'i::•:::•:::::•::: ::;:: �[��I�I�i� ::.::::. :. ::..:::::::::::::::: ::.::. �:::::::::; :.::::::::::::::. �:::;:>:: :,e�....::....:.......::.. :::.........:.. :....::::: :.:::::. �::::::::::. �::::::. �:::::::::::::. �. �.: �. �::::::::::::::::. ::. :.� ::.........................:.....:: •:.:•::::::: :•:::.�::::.�::::::::::::::::. 8707 BO�tG 707 � B727 BOIING 727 B727H BOIING 727 - HUSH KTT B733/4J5 BOELI�tG 737-300/400/500 B737 BOEIlVG �37 100/200 SIIZIFS B747 BOIING 747 B74F BOEING 747 FREIGHTII2 B757 BO�G 757 B767 BOIING 767 BA10 BRTTISH AEROSPACE 125 BAll BRTTISH AEE20SPAC� 111 BA46 BRITISH AIItOSPAC� 146 CZ65 CANADAIIt 650 DA10 FALCON 10 DC10 MC�ONNELL DOUGLAS DC10 DCS MGDONNELL DOUGLAS DC8 DC87 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC8 70-SERIF.S RE DC9 MC�70NNELL DOUGLAS DC9 DC9H MCT�ONNII.,L DOUGLAS DC9 HUSH KTT EA31 AIl2BUS IlVDUSTRIES A310 EA32 AIltBUS INDUSTRiE5 A320 FK10 FOKI�It 100 FK27 FOKKIIt F27 (PROP) FK28 FOKxF�It F28 L1011 LO� TRISTAR L1011 1bID11 MCDONNII.L DOUGLAS DC11 NIDSO MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 80-SIItIES SW3 SWEARIlVGEN MFTROLItVER 3 SW4 SWEARINGEN METROLINIIt 4 SF34 SAAB 340 � Aviatia�n Noise &. Satellite Programs Page 9 C ( ; ; Metropolitan Airports Commission 12unway Use - Day/Night Periods - All CDperations Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport May 1996 Daytime Hours Nighttime Hours Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Page 10 Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs Metropolitan Aisports Commission Community Overflight Analysis Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport May 1996 Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (llpm - 6 am) Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 11 Metropolitan Airports Commission Remote Monitoring Site Locations Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Page 12 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Melropolitan Airports Commission Carrier Jet Arrival Related Noise Events May 1996 Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT �:: '�'�`''ei�t�� <::: >::".::;;:ei��s::::::>; :::::>. ��: ►:::::::<::::>:�:::::::>�::::::::::> ::::>:::��€�ii�<:<: ��::��>��:�::;::::::`::.�� <.;;:;.;:;::>::::<xE:::�>•::'::E::::<::??:EE:: :::::::::>::::::EE::::;:::?::;:z::?:::;::s::::::?::::>::>EE:::EE:::::::::> ::::>:'::::E::;:;:ii:::::::`:::;;::::; ::>:?:; ::::::::::::::>::;::::::::::?;>:><:>::>�?E:>::::;::n: ?iiiii::;'�iY�;�2:?iii;ii :;:ii:::ii::iiiiii::::iiiiiiii �:"'''>:#2:ii::i::;i::%::5::?>i#iiiii:ii::`: i?:i?::iii:i;iii:iiii:''::`•;:iii::::::::�:2!5::::;i:iii2:?i::iiii:'i::;,:iiiy:ii?�ii>?,oA;;�ii;.;':'iii:tiii; �. c �.p�. .y�..... .........................:. :........:................. ........................... .................... _.:... :i:;:i::i::::ii:i;i:i:ii:i;:i:i:i;;:i:ii:iiii i:?i:i:;ii:4ii:i:i[:iiiiii::;. ;ii:t i. :i::[i:::::;:::2`�'i;iiii:::iii i::::::ii�. �i: i : : �• : : .r� : :'•.' : : _ �. :i:.�'.1?nlix.ii%1�.'.;:;i::i t>:::::;i<f::i`:::..::::;t..:::i::i �:iiiiiiiii:ii::;:::;:;;ii.2..;;iir:ii:: +::ii:it:ii:i::;>.:.:;y:::::::ir.if>i t:::::i;iii;`;:::.::::iiix"'.''`ii;i •::..:�::.. . . : ::..�:::: .::.� ::::::::::::.��R�r .................... .....�. .. : �.�K�;��x;.,,.,.�,,.,,�:�..........::...4?:.:...:::: :: :. . . .::::..:::.:.:: . ::... :..:. . . :.... ... ... . ... ,�.�:::::.�::::.�:::::: :.:::.� :::::::::�� .:.::::::::::: :.::: :.::::.�:::::::::::::::.�::::::::::: :.:::::::;::: :.:..::::. . . ��>: :::>::::::::::::> : :: .:::::::»::::>s >::::::<>::� �:<:>::s::a::::.:.::.>:.:;:.:>::;<;::::::»»>:::::»::::> ::::::::>::>::>::>:�:;.;::�::;.;:;.>:.::.:>:.::<.:;:.::.;;;;;;;:.::.;:.;::.:::.::.>:.>::.;:>: �;;:.;:::::.»:.;:.>;:.:;. :.:;:;: . . . .. . . ::>::;:: ::::;:;� .:$� ::>::>:� : »:::��::::>::> ::::::�'�.�� .... :::::::. �.� :.::::::.: . ::.:;...:: ..::::::::::::::.:..................... ............................................ :.: ..:::::::::::::::.::. �. �:.:::::::::::::: ::::;�...�.�..�$.:::: .::. � �:...:..: E�.:::: .:::........................ .......................... 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 3074 64 2 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 1367 147 2� 0 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmant Avenue 2855 1561 47 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Strcet 2728 996 6 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 3348 2589 540 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Sizeet 2972 2175 572 0 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave & 64th Street 34 1 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 14 0 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 31 1 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue Fi Bowdoin Street 26 2 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 9 1 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton Street & Rockwood Avenue 15 3 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 18 0 0 0 14 Eagan First Street & McKee Street 2382 72 0 0 15 Mendota �Ieights Cullen Street & Lexington Avenue 88 4 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue &. V'�las Lane 1997 1065 10 0 17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 71 11 0 0 18 Richfield 7Sth Street & l�th Avenue 67 8 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue &. 84th Slnet 57 1 0 0 20 Richfield 75th Strcet � 3rd Avenue 25 3 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 88 3 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1096 3 0 0 23 Mendata Heights Fnd af Kenndon Avenue 890 11 1 0 24 Eagan Chapel La.ne & Wren Lan.e 24Q3 11 3 0 Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 13 ` Metropolitan Airports Cammission Carrier. Jet Departure Related Noise Events May 1996 Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT � >:::��:`:��:er��s��:�:> .>;.;:.;_.>::>;::>::::::::::::>::::::>::::; ?:s :::::::::::::::>::>�?::::::::::;::»::;#>;:::`:::>::::::s:::::::::>::>:>:::> ::>::;>:;>:<::::::::::::::>�:::>::>::>:>::::;>;:>::>:::;>:::::`:' ..::::...:::::::::::::�::.:::::.:�:.>:.:::.�:::::::::::::.;..� .::::.::.�.�:::::::::::::.;:.::.:::::::::::. ....... .. .... .................. ..... #`'.'�.1��.... ....��i'��1 � ....�i'4!@[i ... . :i:::ij:: ' :: . ::: ::i::::i::i :i::i::i::.::i:iiiii:i':::i:.::.iC$:::}.i:!�i::i::::i::i::>::i::i::::::: :::i::•,ii:i::i'.f::i::i::i::i::i::i:Ii:<::<:•,j:::i::::i:::i'� .. .. .... v::::.�� .::::: .::::::::.�:::::.... L ....:::::::::::::::.:�. :v::i: .: ......i.....: .. . . . ... : . .: :: .. . . . .:::: :.�:::::::::::::::::::: :.:: .:::::::::::::::::�: v: .::::::::::::::::::: �::::. .:::::::::::::::::::::.:�:: .::::::>::>:::>::::>:::::<::>::::>:::::::;: :::::>:::::::>::>:::::::»::>: >:>: :. ::>::::::::::>::>::>::::>::>::::::<::> . �:: : :.: : : : ::��::��►�::::::::::::::::;;;::>:>:.;:.:<>;:.::.>::::>:>: :::»;::::::;::<:::»:.>:<::<::>:::: :::;::::>::>:•:<.;:.>:.;>:.>;:.:::>«<::::<::>::>;.;;,>:::;::::>:::;;:;:;:, :::::.�::. . ..�:::::.�: .::::::.�::::::::::�� .......................::t� : .��.::..................:.:.:.......................... .. . . ...:........ ..:....... .. :::::..::. ..: . ::::::::.�?` ::::::::::::::::::: ::... �::�?!�.......... :::.::::::::::::::: ::.::::::::. �:::::: :.::: :.:: :.. �::::. �. �:.: .::::. . : : ��><:::>:::>:>�:�:€�!(�8:�::> ::::<:>::::::;: :::.»::::::>::>:::::::>::::>::>:�:»::»:::<:::.>:.;:;:::.;:.::<.:�::.>::.>:.::.::.::.>:.>.<:>::>::><::>::>::;::::>:>::::::>:.>:.::.>;>;;:.;;:.:>::.::::::>:.>:.;;:::.:::;:.:;.;:.;:.;:;.;;;:.;:.;:.;;:.::.:;:.::.>:: .. .. .: ::::>::: :::>::;� : ::::::::>::>::��1 .... ......... .......... ................................::.::::::::::::::..:.............................................:::.:::::: :.::::: :.::..::.::::::.:�.�:::: :::: �..�".�.k.�'�..�.:.:� .::::��.:::: .::.::.:.................... .......................:.: .........� .......... ....:.::.....::::::::::::::::: :.:................. ..........................:.:::::::::::::::::::................:...::..:................ ........................... ........................... ........................... ........................... 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 735 151 2 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 610 103 1 1 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Strcet & Belmont Avenue 1788 267 24 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 1457 579 61 � 3 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 4833 1921 622 117 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Street 5984 2039 928 375 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave & 64th Street 965 443 59 1 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue Fc 43rd Stre�t 1448 408 25 1 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hariford Avenue 47 1 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 35 0 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 21 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton Street &. Rockwood Avenue 15 3 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 1102 360 3 0 14 Eagan First Street &. McKee Street 1769 665 57 4 15 Mendota I3eights Cullen Street & Lexington Avenue 1203 517 56 0 16 Eagan Avalo� Avenue & V'�las Lane 1990 1111 223 13 17 Bloomington 84th Strcet & 4th Avenue 170 1 1 0 18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 23� 12 3 0 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Sh�eet 107 6 0 0 20 Richfield 75th Stre�t & 3rd Avenue 98 5 0 0 21 Inver Grwe.Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street '788 174 3 0 22 Inver Cxrove Heights Anns Marie Trail 494 165 1 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 1844 11S 1 527 60 24 Eagan Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 712 75 0 0 Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Page 14 Aviatio�n Noise & Satellite Programs Metropolitan Airports Commission '�"en Loud.est Aircraft Noise Events Identified RMT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st S� Minneapolis RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. Minneapolis Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. Minneapolis RMT #4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St. Minneapolis . Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs Page 15 Metropolitan Airgorts CouL�sion Ten I.,oudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified RMT #5: 12th Ave. & 58th S� Minneapolis RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. Richfield Page 16 RMT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th St. � Minnea polis RMT #8: Longfellow A�e. & 43rd.St. Minneapolis Aviatioai Noise & Satellite Programs Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing C C Metropolitan Airports Commission Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified RMT #9: Saratoga St & Hartford Ave. St. Paul RMT #11: Finn St. & Scheffer A�e. St. Paul Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing RMT #10: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. S� Paul ItMT #12: Alton 5t. & Rockwood Ave. S� Paul Aviatio� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 17 � C i j Metropolitan Airports Commission Ten L,oudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified RMT #13: Southeast End of Mohican Court Mendota Heights RMT #15: Cullon St. & Le�ngton Ave. Mendota Heights , Page 18 RMT #14: lst S� & McKee S� Eagan RMT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane Eagan :�� <:;:;:;;:;�:��::::::::;:; `::�:;:�:��'::><>':::`::;:'':::;>:::>:::::;::;::::;> ::''::::>`��::`��.�i�''':::;'<;:'::�:�:::::>:>: :>::>:::;::;:::>:::>;:::::>�::<<: ::::>:;<>.::;:»:<::<:: <:::::>: :::»�::::;r�?::>':>':: :�::><:'�' : ::::>:::�;�Sr��::::> ::::::::::::::>::::>::>::>::::>:::::: :.: � »�:`:::;::: .;:.>:.;:::.;>:;:.::;: �:.;:. :.:.:.:<.::.;:;.::.::.::.:.::.:.: OS/04/'9612:27:01 B727 101.7 D OSlZ6/96 8:45:33 B727 101.5 D OS/07/'9612:0727 B727 101.1 D OS/15/'96 20:5'7:06 B727 100.7 D OS/27/'9610:17:43 B727 100.7 D OS/06/'9612:03:01 B727 100.5 D OS/16/'9617:16:02 B727 100.5 D OS/06/'9612:01:37 B727 100.4 D OS/09/96 9:34:27 B727 100.4 D OS/23/96 21:00:17 B727 100.4 D Aviation Noise 8c Satellite Programs Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing Metropolitan Airports Commissian Ten Loudest Aircraft l�Toise Events Identified RMT #17: 84th St. & 4th Ave. Bloomington RMT #19: 16th A�e. & 84th St. Bloomington Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing RMT #18: 75th St. & 17th Ave. Richfield I21VIT #20: 75th S� & 3rd A�e. Richfield . Aviatian Noise 8c Satellite Pragrams Page 19 Meuopolitan Airports Commission Ten I,oudest Aircraft Noise Events Identified RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th St. Inver Grove Heights RMT #23: End of Kenndon A�e. Mendota Heights Page 20 RMT #22: Anne Marie Trail Inver Grove Heights RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Eagan Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs Note: Seven Days of ARTS Data Missing C C �. Metropolitan Airports Commission Flight Track Base Map Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring System Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 21 0 • t ` \ ` .��-� \ ` �`'1 ' ' \ ` w•. ��,�-� � . 1 t / � /r � � `\\\�� l ' � i �� - 1 �'�� ; �� ,��"�1 `i � • � � . .�1► �. � -•.,�i _ i3�� '�� dIU' : •'�--"�i► � �' S�(�i, � �� : �;� �. . �\, �+� /j,\ � � . . ,, / . .�r► , �1�r�/Ii��^ v° • 5 � /Ii:I/O �1� � � !�. �\�\ Ir��►\` � . .��r�—i�/1 �1 i►`�'t �i�i�,.�11 1� � _ ��li� .�� . �► � �i^'NI s . .!�. _ +��,`�'i.. :,�-„�.� .• r`� �/�! /I . � !-'�� '� I....� �i/. ' , y - �� ' . .. . . _ .__: .. . , ,: V . �'/,i, ��, M ',. �.' . :.. � �/�. / �' i " �,`� ` . � `_`�� t�ji�''�,1',+�..; ' � t —"'�`�`'_�' �.. � �e .if,l��Ij�%��►� �,��`�`1i��:; �, �//" �� i � ^ !� =� �y�\� �� : t i � + Z �� ,\ � .. s✓ .� /. _�':��`"`'\� , � � !!i�_ ��',\�\.. ` `��\i.....�c , _ .�/ � �, I �_:.� -.� ��\� `� �.ti � �1 ' � � � \ �\it�.�' . .. �' � �\� � `�i � � t \, '� `, � � ��\`:��a;` � � � '��.. `�� < �� >� Idli ., ..:,:..w . . .�\��\ � �I� . h.,. !�� \\ v� � �� I"\�. � • � , � �� i �i► .u.,,.�`;. t I , '''.N�`\ ►.•~ � . ♦ � _ ��`��i ��j\� ' � : �►� U► : —_ \ ��r. � /� �.. \��.�`-��I �' �."/�{' 1 d . �. i t . !s : �'� '��, +.��V�� ./ :+ �► /�, I' . � �/1'�`�it if/�� ' `i �- : j , ,i -� . r;, �1y ��`��\��J�� _ � \��\� ��;� `��ii `` `� ; �..•.,, a♦'`,� ,.• ,; . � • � \ \\� ``�`�� : , � -;. . , ' �� ► ,�. , � „ , • " :� �� :. �� . , ��:� .� _ � .: • : �,. ri�� ;� � ` \,.` �,\ I� . 1 � .� . \� -.:,,� . � ��p�. 'Ij•' � s � .i + . � ,,` ,\.��\l � '��I .. . .� , . .._ �� :CAi . .� . � �1`1,`:j\� ��\� ` �.'�+`,�� ,\ j ;+ . �i ``��-�!►�.1�/��i,� -- � — -'�-��,;�I\,�I��z� � ; �}��.y � � � ��:. .�.`;ii.►!: � . i<< a i ,.� . _ -- �� _ • o � ,ii ,, .� , + .� �, \. _ _ ;,. �1��11��: � � � n �iD ��i �'►� �iD1\\��ru � ��I��i� .�.i�-.�a_.f�^� �� . \ , � ll. i �G��;iinil;..� � w ." S.� • r�r _ ; • .� \ y� � � ' ♦ ..�. � `' �.�dllt�yu�i:� ..�,��►' '�!� �� .i. _ n�`�., i�r . s ,;� '. �i` � �c/ � ' .. ' . �r � � � �/I � , _' � .- � � � �r !i i �i � _ - ;`-�.�� , ♦ � 4�;��1%� �' _ ' � ��` � � '�� +� jt � -�.r�� ,�: , ►.._.�-•.au�� .' 1. ii��li6��!.- � �"�.` 4� � _-�,��\� t i j , c;_�.��r�1�C�_��:_ ��"� �� ~�,ri1.�'\�Ui . � .� y �i •/dn8 �n1 .. ,- s��.`"1\ . � � �. . , . �. , . f� .�"- _ .c��h� ... . ... .. �::'i'.� �`~''� \`�\,'� �,\�q� .� l �� !��►�'\�" �i.�. � � `! ��\�\�� . . � :��`.,,�� ; , ' >��\`��•.��G�►�':�'��° _ : ;, �� .�\��:�\��h % �-.� : -. ...�,.;. � , � �� . '�_ \.�\\�\�,��q�fi� � ��\�.� !`.., � .� i - • � � �y� �'\ i � �'�� •�; •, 41�� _ � �, \�• .. � �: •-'-"_ '� t��i\�. ., :� r•'G�, _ ''��•L��o. � .- . Ij ��'�ii�. � _ .: �i'�. � �� „� •� „�.r[e �1... i - ir i'' 1' � �'�l�/��,-�'M. . i -1 � � �� '/�f� \ - ,� \� � ,��\�jt��J'��i,�, : ',: , � ;,,�; .�!;.t1 � �� . "��` �:�` •c: _�� G,'%•' ;-: �' , . ��,,:�,-" ..: ;. ,` � ��..� �. , ;. ,��-, � . ;.�. t' , �� t� t � i , -. �,�� - , �; r i ; . : ' ; r,, � ,`� ° . . •, 3 ` •�' .. ~�... .. . . . . .. �. __... ;',,1 \t,\. � � \\\1\��..� �� ` ':�.. , o,��!� � r '�v:.. , . , `� � �' � � ' '� •`�w ��= .� .., i . �:q� . � � � �.A � �,} ` li��l��'v� �.�� .. ” _ �� j�� .�� _ - .� «... - :. . _: . , , ,.._ ;.. . ..��mia ,� � "__ 1�� ' : �/.�i.. �:�. ��.�. •/.' ..��„1ti•��►� ��.� _ __ _ '._' � ��. � = �'��/��j�11'q►'�!; `•- . =�+a. � �!::� , , . • ��. . . ► . /� Z � �� '~ ; 4 ., —.r� : � : . .,_+.. �r1i�� : . . ..,.��...,-,-. : "�..� :::\ ' � � —��.c---`t' ��„ � . �`:•�:.�`!�C::,�+ ` ` ;.. „s � , �:..��.._:'-,`�•` _':�:�,•1\, � ,. . .: '.... ..._. •' '.' '_ . _.. _. ia��!�►� \ �b � � � ±1.J. ►�"_i�\ � i � 1 j „�\, �.��,�., II'�' i —� I'��'. .. � - � � � . . `-1, ,/ . ., : � � � ir�;cr,►.�.;,� ,; ' �' �; ��,�i�� ,� . t � � ; ��v\` � �!,��►i • � ; , , � , ��%�.,1 , ��.�, ��, � t . 1 , � 4 � 1\��``�� } '�'' 1 , \ \�. . '. . � .�:.t��.. . . ��,` ` \. _. +'' _ :.4; _ . . ... •��' y �... . \ " � �� a\\`�� . �� ♦ �+ . . � ., �.�� - -- - , - � r� • . .� ,, , � w` ~ ~�,!\ l,�i-''� � ..��.; :: • �� .. �� : y �. v.,��. .. � � ��'e� �� :` —'%- — ��14�!�� ;�, ��; ��,c � . , L �, �\•u ��u� a ��` ,� _ �� `' N ��s �b., �',�� I' � � � �/� ;�r t�� '•`J �'� �'� t,"� � . ✓3 ��/ I�.� ♦:�w% �' � ! .:` ./i I,��i% ��:1�I `r��' . . . ` � �� rr '�J,.i/!�v+��.�i' i �1i � � /��, � ►\ ..►�,. t � R�I%�/�':�i � �� • .v..� ' ►='.v�►'�ji.'I► t�:,l�\�•~ . . � �,!Yf�i/ .'�Ilrr��`• `��`7` ��G�`�\ \�a '� �: ' . _ ° �_ ��%.'.%' �/�l►Q%�� `i`i,�s,i,l' ,`. ►a111 ��. ��-.,,�`:� � �- � t � � ��,� � ��1��:,��.,� � .s � ; '�' `��'�r.'�� .��.� �; ' `; ,.. � ,, • �i�; r ' ' , 4 S,: � . � r � � � ��►, `,��,�-,�% � ,l, �i '�� h�� j �.� .. � ��% �� 1� _ �• �//,;'''. � -�'1'��,;��;,, ►,r,,� �- r��;,� ,. "=�� i .�- � ` ✓�%i -" . ��r %/ � '� 1 � �`; I/y; � ' 1, j.� j /�. �. : 1'. �i`t i ' - ; � .i..�c � . � !� , .�i � �✓ �i ��i/ . �%1!�'. j�. � � `Q'• C Metropolitan Airports Commission Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events o Aircraft Ldn dB(A.} May Ol to May 31,1996 Noise Monitor Locations 1 56.0 55.2 60.9 63.0 71.6 76.8 64.3 64.4 45.2 , 44.2 49.3 41.0 2 58.6 58.7 66.4 65.7 76.3 76.3 66.0 59.3 43.1 42.5 46.9 45.5 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 59.1 43.5 67.8 55.5 73.2 60.9 * * 45.8 47.5 * 48.6 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 58.7 61.5 64.9 65.1 70.4 71.6 66.5 49.7 58.0 40.6 47.3 48.2 � 58.0 60.1 64.6 63.6 69.9 70.8 * 53.9 56.5 49.5 * 46.1 $ 61.9 63.0 68.0 66.7 70.9 72.3 45.6 * 46.4 50.2 50.3 46.5 9 62.0 62.8 67.8 66.4 '72.8 71.1 47.6 44.2 45.2 47.9 45.7 48.8 10 59.8 58.5 66.9 73.6 72.1 79.7 62.3 65.6 54.3 42.4 40.4 40.9 11 53.7 45.7 64.6 61.5 '74.6 61.9 64.8 53.6 47.6 47.8 * 41.2 12 50.7 47.1 63.7 66.5 77.7 65.1 66.8 60.5 44.4 40.5 * * 13 54.0 55.2 62.7 64.0 74.3 78.0 68.2 64.0 48.8 44.7 40.9 44.5 14 64.7 65.5 70.6 68.7 75.0 75.1 59.7 62.3 48.8 59.2 54.1 54.0 15 58.6 59.2 63.8 62.8 67.7 70.0 * 45.9 * 41.5 * 45.8 1 16 62.1 62.1 699 66.2 74.5 72.2 47.8 SS.3 46.2 47.2 45.9 50.9 17 62.2 61.2 69.9 65.3 75.3 75.7 63.2 62.7 412 47.8 43.9 48.9 18 56.9 58.1 66.5 66.1 76.7 80.0 66.9 * 42.7 49.2 46.1 56.0 19 * * * * * * * * � * * * 2p 53.4 45.5 60.2 62.6 74.9 77.6 65.2 62.8 44.2 55.9 42.4 44.9 21 � 55.4 * 64.9 67.8 78.1 71.1 69.'7 65.9 47.9 56.6 48.4 41.5 22 * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 57.5 * 63.1 63.2 67.7 69.2 * 43.7 44.1 46.5 48.4 * 24 5'7.3 * 67.2 63.8 72.6 70.5 * 43.1 44.6 50.2 48.9 44.7 25 56.6 * 63.2 62.5 69.1 68.4 42.2 * * 44.5 56.0 44.5 26 58.1 * 63.3 62.6 68.0 69.7 42.6 * 44.2 44.0 * 49.1 2"7 56.5 * 65.7 63.6 69.5 69.7 48.6 * * 45.2 * * 28 * * * � * * * * * * * * 29 50.5 * 60.8 58.6 �67.6 67.1 * * * * * * 30 55.9 * 64.8 63.8 '71.5 ,71.0 * * 46.0 51.6 43.9 48.7 �:, ..f,•. - 31, 56.0,,::. *; -. ; 65.1 ,63 9r� t 69 8�:7 � 51.3 48.0;. ; 4,6.3 ,.. 52.0 48.4 47.1 � r� i __..- �,,. . .. ,. ;., � . ,. .. ..._ �. . . " � . ,___ ._.,._.. � - Mo: �L;�dn 59 7,' S�8 9;.?' 66.3 `66 4�, �?5�2 K,`75�4::, 64.7, 62.9 51 S 52.2 51.6 50.6 � * Less than twenty four hours of data avaiTable Aviaqo�n Noise & Satellite Programs Page 27 l�Ietropolitan Airports Commission A.nalysis of A�ircraft Noise Events - A.ircraft I.dn d�(A) May Ol to May 31,1996 Noise Monitor Locations ��::�:':�;�Ai►�:��r ��'::::>::> ::::::;'`::';''"�: �:;:; >::::;`...;>r;`�`.� :::::: :::::.:::�..: �..;.>�..:;<;::: :::::::'...::::<:;;i:�::'::� >:::: `<.:,'::y>'::::::::: :';:::;`.:: ;:<:;<'::`:::::>: :::>::'�'>�ti>>>�':;';;' :?:jifi:;:;::::>:�>;.;;;:, ;�:;��':;:��,�::<<>:�:�'�.�; ,;s,:,;;:::::;:;::�;<::::::::�; ::�'y:�>:::'�,`::`,::<�;:::� ::i.5>:>>> �:(� �j`�:.;:;:;: ;:.:. �Xy ...........:. �:: �Y:.iii'fii :ti.: i:::•�ryii p:.i��}iii :: :.i: i: ��:':':.: .ii: ��.i:'i: .iii��}ii? t.. ��V, v:. ... ��..... ..:.,.,.�,.,��,,I,,,�, ,.. . ... ��.... ... ��... ... ��... ... ��;F.... 1 40.1 60.8 45.8 66.5 57.2 63.0 43.9 56.5 49.9 SS.S 53.6 54.2 2 56.5 67.0 60.0 68.7 40.0 49.6 44.3 48.3 59.5 56.8 69.5 53.5 3 * * * * * * * * * * * � 4 55.0 70.7 56.3 71.3 43.6 47.9 47.2 * 60.1 64.8 64.6 57.2 � * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 63.6 69.1 66.4 71.4 47.9 44.1 * 47.3 60.1 59.4 74.3 53.8 � 63.4 69.1 66.0 72.5 42.9 * 45.5 53.1 61.2 62.2 75.9 55.0 $ 62.1 67.6 64.6 70.5 * * 49.0 49.9 60.4 59.1 74.8 56.4 9 58.6 69.0 62.0 73.1 51.6 * 48.0 49.7 60.0 59.6 72.6 51.7 10 41.0 64.9 41.1 70.6 46.3 * 44.7 48.3 42.6 60.8 49.6 61.2 11 45.3 68.4 41.9 69.6 41.2 44.6 49.5 49.5 41.7 60.1 56.0 52.1 12 * 61.4 * 67.9 49.2 43.0 40.5 42.3 41.0 55.1 45.7 50.7 13 43.5 63.9 48.1 66.9 44.6 59.3 41.7 43.6 47.8 56.2 54.6 51.3 14 66.4 69.6 69.4 70.9 53.8 58.6 40.7 50.9 63.4 62.5 76.1 61.9 15 63.3 69.4 69.1 69.6 45.3 46.3 40.5 * 60.8 57.1 75.9 47.9 16 66.1 68.3 68.2 * 43.3 41.6 46.9 46.0 55.8 52.0 78.9 41.7 17 64.4 66.4 68.4 70.5 46.9 56.2 * 48.6 59.6 53.6 76.3 49.1 18 56.1 65.4 60.3 71.0 44.4 46.8 41.8 41.2 51.8 61.1 69.8 50.3 19 * * * * * * * * * � * * 20 * 58.6 50.3 63.9 47.6 51.1 48.9 43.0 47.1 53.0 52.1 48.9 21 48.2 62.4 64.1 68.0 42.� 53.4 44.6 54.3 48.5 56.1 67.8 44.9 22 * * * * * * * * * * * * 23 56.4 65.0 62.7 70.0 * 49.2 * 40.3 53.3 * 72.3 46.8 24 52.0 5'7.0 55.1 67.2 54.9 53.8 * * 44.2 * 69.2 42.1 25 56.7 62.0 61.0 68.2 55.8 54.4 49.2 41.4 54.8 * 70.6 46.7 26 55.8 63.0 61.4 68.8 43.5 49.'7 * * 49.0 49.1 70.2 46.9 27 57.5 58.1 62.4 67.5 53.7 52.5 * * 44.8. * 71.8 44.0 2.g - * * * * * -.:�:�,,x * * * � * * :;: 29 46.8 58.2 59.2 67.1 46.2 40:$ "= 47.8 40.0 41.3 48.1 * 43.7 3Q 56S 62.1 61.4 69.3 * �* *`':�;:- * 51.3 43.5 71.1 48.5 ; 31� ,,. •r 51.1. >; 52.6 � 62; 4 ,, ��2�D: ;: ,,* ,,� ; 'K�;�, � 42 2.,; ; *:_ * 42.6 _ 69.8 49.3 ,.�': . l / I�, F �� ' . tl2o. Ldn� �� 59.9 �' 66 5�� 63:f �''^'�a �' S2 4' :;J5�5"1�'� i' 48 9, '� {;�.S�.;S . 57.8 58.8 72.1 53.5 �` Less than twenry four hours of data available Page 28 Aviati� Noise & Satellite Frograms .� 0 0 0 0 . . s • �• � � o, o0 0 0 0 0 � 0 � 0 0 0 � ► � rn o0 0 0 0 0 n � �� ' r � 0 0 0 • • � . � 0 0 0 • ► � l" � rn o0 0 0 0 0 � r � � 0 0 0 0 M 1C� i� CD b O y � � N � O ► • t" O < � M 1C� ✓• � � 0 � � o a o 0 C: ( ��C C� 'Metropolitan Airjwrts Commission �.�' ; � � ,�. . � � � � � �, , � �, ,� ° , , . � , , , � � . � : .��, �� , � �, �I •.. �� '; , �' � � � �I . • , �•/. , / 1 � 111 '� �� . 1 1 1 ;�. F 'i 1 l,, Page 2 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � Metropolitan Airports Commission , l�inneapolis - Si. Paul Inte�national A.irport . 1Viay 199b 53I5 ... Total 11L and.11R Carrier Jet I)epartures � 12 ... Carrier Jet Iiepartures Oe2%) 11To�t�i of Proposed 095° (1!�) Corrid.or Folicy �oundary ` �_ � � � � C N': 12 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE LEFT CO�NT=12 (100,0�} RIGNT CO�NT=O (0.0�) �� DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Paae 3 C � 'Metropolitan Airports Commission IViinneapolis - St. Paul Inter�ational A.irport 1VIay 1996 � �� 5315 ... Total liL andL 11R Carrier Jet I)epa�tures 1 ... Carrier �et Departure - Eariy �rnout (4.0%) � (I�torih Side �efore Three l�iles) 1 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE LEFT CO�NT=1 (100.0�) RIGHT CO�NT=O (0.0�) DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft Page 4 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Metropolitau Airports Commission Southern �oundary Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis l�inneapolis - St. Paul Internationai Airport llol % (594) Carrier Jet I)ep►artures South of Corridor (South of 29I. I..ocalizer) Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 5 m C (. �Metropolitan Airports Commission W � � � F— <L Page 6 �� I' .,�,� �� , , � , . r� ,, �. � � 5'315 ... Total �.1�. and 11�t Carrier Jet 1)epa�iures 5�2 ... Carrier Jet I.iepariures (10. %) South of Corridor (South of 29I.f I...ocalizer) 582 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE LEFT COUNT=578 (99.3�) RIGNT CO�NT=4 (0.7�) ; i i i ; , ; ; � ; , � ; . ; ; � i ; , , � -----------------;-----------------,-----------------�------------------; -----------------�----------------- ;. i A e � e � e � ' ; � e� oi i � • � • � i � •�� ; � � � � � • � � � � • � � � -----------4-�' '-� 1--�--------�-� --------------�----------------- �------------------;------------------ ? �/{ e ; s ' �i �s o e°� •; � e � i • • � i � •+4N•.S • � • � I � � s� '� � • ' � � �� y�O��e � � i t � �•� O � � � �� •r �e � i � � i "_""""' I e Ry�"" � ' . . �-�' _' _' _""""' _ _ _ �"""' _""""' _ _i-_""""' _ """�"_ _ _""""'_" _ • �� i i � � •• e e ' � � O N • �� i • i i i � � �� i i i i �♦ _ � i � i •• • � � i i � i � i � � � i -----------'#-'�'i------"------'--�----------'--'--- � � �---"---------"--�-----------------�-------------'-'-� � i � � i i � i O '"""_"""""' � _""""_" O i i i i —s000 —4aoo _2 i i i i ti """"'' """""'_""' i i i i i i i i i i � � � r i 20 DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (fk) Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs a �� „ I� �_ � �_ Metropolitan Airports Commission 1Vlinneapolis - St. Paul Int�rnaiional Airport 1v�ay g996 5315 ... Tota111I, and 111Z Carrier Jet LDepartures �2 .e. Carrier Jet Departures - Early Turnout (0,2%) (South Side.�efore Three 1Vliles) 12 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE �EFT COUNT=6 (50.0�) RIGNT COUNT=6 (50.0�) -4 DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GRTE (ft) Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � � Page 7 C 'Metropolitan Airports Commission 1 ; , i, 1 1 .; ` i 1' 1 . . � . . � � �, � ,, � � r,, ., , �,, ,' � �,� ;;� �� 2.1 %(113} Ca�rier Jet I)epartttres 5° South oi Corridor (5° South oi 29L Localizer) Page 8 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � Melropolitan Airports Commission � 1Vlinneapolis - St. Paul International A.irport May 1996 �� 531'S ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Liepartures l01 ... Carrier �et Departures (l. %) S° 5outh of Corridor (5° South of 29L Localizer) 101 TRACKS CROSSEO P-GATE LEFT COUNT=98 (97.0�) RIGNT COUNT=3 (3.0�) � DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 9 � Metropolitan Airports Commission . � 1!�[inneapolis - �t. Paul Intermational Airport 1VIay 1996 �� 5315 ... Total 11L and.11R Carrier Jet I)epartures 12 ... Carrier Jet Departures - Eariy �.�.rnou.t (0.2%) (South Side �efore Three 1l�Iiles) 12 TRACKS CROSSED P-GRTE LEFT COUNT=6 (50.0�) RIGNT COUNT=6 (50.0�) J -4� DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Page 10 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � i i � � �` I ' � '' ♦ 1 ` A biweekly update on litigation, re ;ulations, and technologic:xl developments Volume 8, Number 10 Nlay 27, 1996 PFCs 8 PERCENT OF TC)TAL PFCs APPROVED DEVOTED TO AIRPORT NOISE PROJECTS About 8 percent — or $785.2 million = of the totaI $12.9 billion in Passenger Facility Charges that the Federal Aviation Administration has approved for collection by airports is being designated for noise mitigation purposes, according to data provided by the FAA. Last spring, FAA. data indicated that about 9 percent of the total $11.2 billion in PFCs aporoved at that time for collection was being devoted to noise mitigation projects (7, ANR, 66). In its record keeping of PFC projects, the FAA subdivides noise projects into six different categories. Following is the total amount for each category as well as the percentage that category represents of the total PFCs for noise being collected: • $342,406,975 (43.61 percent) to purchase land; •$280,532,521 (35.73 percent) for "multi-phase" projects, which include two or more different projects devoted to land acquisition, avigation easements, home buyouts, sales assistance, and soundproofing; •$151,086,707 for soundproofing projects. This represents 19.24 percent of the total noise projects. �� (Continued on p. 80) PFCs 47 AIRPORTS IMPOSING PFCs TO SUPPORT � NOI5E MITIGATION PROJECTS, DATA SHOW A total of 47 airports — one more than last yeac at this time — are imposing Passenger Facility Charges (PFCs) to support airport noise mitigation projects, according to data from the Federal Aviatian Administration. Minneapolis-St. Paul International A.irport and Las Vegas McCarran International Airport stand out as the two giants in collecting PFCs for noise mitigation pur- poses. MSP leads the list�with plans to collect $98 million in PFCs dedicated mostly to its residential sound insulation program. McCarran is not far behind. It plans to collect $91.8 miIlion in PFCs, mostly for land acquisition. Following is a list of airports that plan to impose more than $l0 million in PFCs for their noise mitigation programs: Indianapolis International ($77.9 million), Lambert-St. Louis International ($72.8 million), Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International ($70.8 million), Seattle-Tacoma International ($67.5 million), Detroit Metro Wayne County ($46.5 million), Milwaukee General Mitchell Internationai ($39.4 million), Chicago O'Hare International ($35.3 milIion), Cleveland Hopkins International ($29.5 million), Boston Logan International ($25.6 million), Bur- bank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport ($24.2 million), Ft. Lauderdale-Hollywood International ($15.6 milIion, and Palm Beach International ($10.2 million). Airports planning to collect between $S million to $10 million in PFCs for noise (Continued on p. 80) Copyright m 1996 by AirpoR Noise Report, Ashburn..Va. 220I 1 In This Issue.... PFCs for Noise ... This special issue of ANR pro- vides data obtained from the Federal Aviation Administra- tion on airports that are collecting Passenger Facility Chazges (PFCs) to support their noise mitigation proj- ects. It shows that 47 airports are now imposing PFCs for noise mitigation projects with Minneapolis-St. Paul Interna- tional leading the pack and planning to collect almost $100 million to fund its residential sound insulation program. Las Vegas McCar- ran International is a close second, planning to collect $91 million to buy land. � Several other airports plan to collect over $50 million each €or noise projects. Most of the PFCs being collecting for noise projects will go to buy land and homes and for soundproofing prograrns. Table 1, showing PFCs being collected for various categories of noise projects, begins on p. 74. Table 2, showing PFCs being collected by specific airports, begins an p. 77. 1VIay 27, 1996 Table 2 AIRPORT NOISE ABATEMENT PROJECTS _ FUNDED BY PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES (Projects Approved by FAA as of 5-20-96; listed by airport) Airport Huntsville Int'1 Phoenix Sky Harbor B ur6ank-Glendale-Pasadena Monterey Peninsula Oakland Int'1 Sacramento Metro San Diego Int'1 San Jose Int'1 Pueblo Ft. Lauderdale Int'I Southwest Fla. Tnt'1 Orlando Int'l Pensacola Regional Sarasota-Bradenton Int'1 Palm Beach Int'1 Chicago O'Hare Int'1 State Project Tvae Project Amount AL . AZ CA CA CA CA CA CA CO FL. FT.. FL FL FL. FT.. IL Total Land acquisition Land acquisition Noise mitigation Acquire land Residential soundproofing Noise monitoring system Total Noise monitoring system Part 150 study School sound insulation Total Upgrade monitoring system Noise attenuation Part 150 study Total Noise mitigation program Noise monitoring system ' \� Part 150 study Part 150 study Total Land acquisition Vegetation barrier Avigation easements Total Part 150 program Part 150 program Total Land acquisition Land acquisition Land acquisition Land acquisition Land acquisition Part 150 study � Total Residential survey Insulation/purchase assurance Schooisoundproofing Voluntary acquisition Permanent noise monitoring Airport Noise Report $7,716,960 $6,796,960 $920,000 $4,000,000 $24,241,000 $824,321 $345,000 $791,000 $761,000 $30,000 $1,461,000 $9,918,000 $140,000 $9,778,000 $21,5Q0 $15,660,000 $15,000,000 $660,000 $132,000 $22,500 $1,565,000 $1,000,000 $200,000 $365,000 $6,874,904 $1,474,904 $5,400,000 $10,233,092 $1,000,000 $2,302,300 $374,616 $1,387,548 $5,000,000 $168,628 $35,333,144 $41,448 $1,000,000 $4,900,�41 $26,390,955 $3,000,000 6 77 Date PFC Imaosed 03-06-92 03-06-92 01-26-96 06-17-94 10-08-93 06-26-92 04-26-96 04--26-96 07-26-95 06-11-92 06-11-92 04-11-96 11-01-94 1'� I1-01-94 � 08-31-92 08-28-95 11-23-92 11-23-92 11-23-92 06-29-92 06-29-92 O 1-26-94 O 1-26-94 0 I -26-94 O 1-26-94 0 I -26-94 O i-26-94 06-28-93 06-28-93 06-28-93 06-28-93 06-28-93 \ �s Airport ;Chica�o Midway Quad City (Moline) Greater Peoria Regional Capital (Springfield) Indianapolis Tnt'1 Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Int'1 ; Lexington Blue Grass Baton Rouge Metro Portland Int'1 Boston Logan Int'i Detroit Metro Duluth Int'1 Minn./St. Paul Int'1 Kansas City Int'i Lambert St. Louis Int'l ' I State IL IL IL IL IN KY , I{Y i LA ME MA MI MN MN • u• Project Tvue Project Amount Total $4,644,892 Blast fence/noise bacrier $297,707 Blast fence/noise barrier $11,493 Permanent noise monitoring $918,261 Blast fence/noise barrier $635,374 Hush house $124,969 School sound insulation $1,757,088 Update Part 150 program $500,000 Home soundproofing demo $400,000 Land acquisition $335,915 Total $1,150,000 Noise mitigation/acquisition $650,000 Noise mitigation of church $500,000 Total � � $523,958 Land acquisition $10,500 Land acquisition $11,958 Land acquisition $9,000 Land acquisition $7,000 Land acquisition $500 Land acquisition $22,000 Hush house/site work $463,000 Land acquisition $77,949,000 Total $70,872,000 Monitoring Equipment $999,000 Noise comp. land use measures $41,953,000 Part 150 supplemental study $315,000 Nois'e comp. land use measures $27,605,000 Total $332,819 Noise abatement program $173,036 Noise abatement program $159,783 Noise mitigation $8,532,260 Residential sound insulation $225,000 Residential sound insulation $25,607,000 Total $46,542,000 Noise berm $192,000 Noise mitigation program $46,350,000 Part 150 study $18,000 Total $98,098,300 Land acquisition $11,100,000 Noise monitoring system $248,800 Home insulation/buyouts $76,303,300 School noise abatement $10,000,000 School noise abatement $446,200 Land acquisition $9,880,000 Total $72,861,850 Land acquisition/retocation $32,861,850 Land acquisition/relocation $40,000,000 Airport Noise Repori Noise Report Date PFC Im�osed _� 06-28-93 06-28-93 06-28-93 06-28-93 06-28-93 06-28-93 07-OS-95 07-OS-95 09-29-94 09-08-94 09-08-94 03-27-92 03-27-92 03-27-92 03-27-92 03-27-92 11-24-93 I 1-24-93 06-28-93 03-30-94 03-30-94 03-30-94 11-29-95 08-31-93 08-31-93 09-28-92 10-29-93 08-24-93 09-21-92 09-21-92 07-Oi-94 OS-13-94 OS-13-94 05-13-94 OS-13-94 05-13-94 12-21-95 09-30-92 01-31-96 27, 1996 Airpart Las Vegas McCarran Int'I Reno/Tahoe Int'1 Greiner Industrial Airpark (Manchester) MacArthur (Islip) Cleveland Hopkins Int'1 Port Columbus Int'1 Dayton Int'1 Erie Int'1 McGhee-Tyson (Knoxville) / LubbockInt'I . � Salt Lake City Int'1 Lynchburg Municipal Bellingham Int'1 Seattle-Tacoma Int' 1 �. '79 Date PFC State Project Tvpe Project Amount Imposed NV Total Land acquisition Part 150 update Land acquisition Land acquisition Land acquisition Land acquisition NV Residential sp pilot program NH Noise mitigation �• OH OH PA TN TX UT VA WA WA Outagamie County (Appleton) WI Gen. Mitchell Int'1 (Milwaukee) WI Noise pro�ram Total Insulate residences ' Land acquisition/ home relocation Total Noise monitoring Plans, specs school soundproof Soundproof schools Residendal soundproofing Land acquisition/relocation Land acquisition/relocation Land acquisitionJrelocation Ma;ntenance run-up pad Residential soundproofing -.l�.and acquisition/relocation Noise mitigation Land acquisition Part 150 study Land acquisition Land acquisition Total Land acquisition Land acquisition Total Noise remedy program Residential sound insulation Residential sound insulation Noise programs Land acquisition Total Home acquisition Land acquisition Noise mon/flight track system Sales assistance Noise mitigation program School, church soundproofing School, church soundproofing � Airport Noise Report $91,193,000 $35,OOO,Q00 $600,000 $5,250,000 9�26,250,000 $6,300,000 $17,793,000 $157,500 $1,100,000 $1,150,000 $29,SOO,Q00 $22,362,400 $7,137,600 $1,487,308 $16,509 $20,323 $71,974 $60,547 $119,600 $379,0'70 $519,723 $61,752 $269,810 $336,333 $100,000 $642,750 $33,511 $515,000 $113,000 $898,000 $166,000 $732,000 $67,511,488 $10,430,488 $22,377,000 $304,000 $34,400,000 $14,502 $39,421,000 $5,676,000 $3,074,000 $256,000 $1,806,000 $23,758,000 $2,335,000 $2,516,000 \ 02-24-92 ' 02-24-92 02-24-92 02-24-92 02-24-92 02-24-92 10-29-93 10-13-92 09-23-94 09-01-92 09-01-92 07-14-92 07-14-92 07-14-92 07-14-92 07-14-92 07-14-92 07-14-92 07-19-93 07-19-93 � 07-25-94 07-21-92 10-06-93 07-09-93 10-01-94 04-14-95 04-29-93 10-OS-94 08-13-92 10-25-93 10-25-93 12-28-95 04-25-94 02-24-95 02-24-95 02-24-95 02-24-95 12-21-95 12-21-95 - 12-21-95 � III��IIII�111i�111��11�111�11��19��f111�Iff111�If1�1�i1��11�1111f111�t�19�1 JUNE 1996 ISS� 30 p,l , o e � � i � �, �� I� - - - - = This house is one of the houses expected to bnng a n��.� value at Auction #6 (see story below). ' � � � � � ' `' t, t ' ' ��' WDSCO has received 4 cornpieted appraisal reports from Lyle Nagell, and to date, 1 review appraisal has been ordered and received hack. MAC, WDSCO, and Kloster Industrial Auchoneers are currently planning the sixth public hause Please remember to contact your WDSCO auction. The auction date is scheduled for consultant if you choose to haveOnce your� e ond T hurs day, June 2 7 t h a n d w i l l b e g i n a t 1: 3 0 p m. I t c o m p l eted on your property. wi l l be he l d a t t h e R i c hfield American Legion which appraisal has been completed, the homeowner or t he ,; located at 6501 Portland Avenue South. appraiser will need to deliver three ( 3) copies o f t h e Approximately 27 houses are scheduled to be appraisal to WDSCO. Your consultant will an'a al auctioned. Prior to the auction, three Open Houses to have both the MAC appraisal and your app were/will be held at the following times: sent to the review appraiser for simultanious review. 1 t edite the offer process for each Wec�nesday, .h�ne 19th from 10 am to 4 pm Satu�day, June 22nd from 10 am to � pm Thursday, June 27th.from 8 am to 12 pm 8ZZS5 [�I � s�ubH �'�°pu�� a.n.zn� �Tzo�azn ZOZZ � ZZaM�Z uzos ��-- --! s_Fe�s�t_ � �� \� .... .s� � ��i�.�T ,�'L.�;,,'�'+ �� + � i� 9 s�; � — �,,;+ :r �-, cn � i:'� .:� :�•%; 'Ye � F�1rl��l�i�r�,i1`;`,• ^" �:�� ,. '.; �-=-=_-_- _- . �, . � ��'� �i=�'-. � �' _-��;:_� = - >>i C =`�. � r, x e-__ _.�,._._.�. This v�nll he p o exp homeowner. Please note that a delay in receiving the homeowner's appraisal causes a delay in the review process and ultimately in the homeowners being presented with a timely offer. __ ___ ylbodaib ti �� + bf�o o. O � � � � + +W o � z � � 7 + �2 6. o' "� d�i 1N�G'S S'��d Z90L-09Z�008) 8688-4'ZL�ZI9) � LI�SS �t�lI `SI'IC)d��I�tISIL1i � x�.r�os �n��n� xssz �vss � �� .��d��i� ��H�S �Q�/b •�so� .na�� 3? : asau� �iiu�e�usanui ai� a�iTo� PTat�u�12T__'uaxozq I DEI�IOL�'I'ION Al�(D ASBESTQS A�ATEIi�ENT Work will begin at the end of June for the second round of demolition. Asbestos will be removed first, followed by the demolition process which we expect to be completed by the end of Tuly. The amount of asbestos identified in this phase of demolition is comparabie to the amount found in the previous phase. The contract for demolition has been awarded to Wickenhauser Excavating, Inc. of Cologne, MN and the contract for asbestos abatement has been awarded to EnviroBate Metro of Minneapolis, MN. EnviroBate has done work for us in the past and we are pleased to be working with them again. The contract for these two companies will extend for a one year period of time. Buildings scheduled for demolition will be assigned to the contractors in groups of approximately twelve. IDUIVIPS'1'Elt POI..aC�'/��'I'lE As reported in previous issues of the Buyout Update, dumpster service is no longer available at the corner of Standish Avenue South and 63rd Street. Instead, the du.mpster will be located in a secured garage and availa6le by appointment only. If you need access to a dumpster, you must ca11 W.D, Schock Company to schedule an appointment. Dumpsters will be available on the following days: Istc�3rd Saturdays every month,from 9: 00 am-11: 00 am Every Tuesday from 11: 00 am-1:00 pm Every Thursday from 3: p0 pm-S.� 00 pm � _ _.,�> This new dumpster policy appeazs to be working well for the homeowners while enabling us to ensure that exclusive use of the dumpsters is by cunent neighborhood residents. If the dumpster service is not convenient for you, you may take your debris to either of the Hennepin County Recycling Centers: South Hennepin Recycling & Problem Waste Drop Off Center, 1400 -West 96th- Street, Bloomington, MN, or Hennepin County Recycling Center & Transfer Station, 8100 Jefferson Highway, Brooklyn Park, MN. VANDALISII�I Once again, vandalism is on the rise. In the last few weeks, there have been more vacant buildings vandalized, with windows and other �xtures being _.__ _ ..�-- incidents. In early June, a gentleman who was interested in purchasing an auction house on the' sixty-four hundred black of 20th Avenue Sout�� witnessed two youths exiting a house after it had been vandalized. As the youths fled 'on a motorscooter the gentleman was able to photograph them and Richfieid Police a:re now in the process of identifying them from these photos. T'hey are ` optimistic that they wi11 appre�end the vandals soon. If you have any information related to the vandalism please give our office or the Richfield Police Department a call. P1�ASE III: RELOCATION Itetocation Closing ITndate As of this June issue of the Buyout Update, (50) Phase III homeowners have closed on :their relocation homes. The Phase III relocation closing process is now 81% completed. As of June 20, ' 1996, (52) Phase III properties have been vacated. The Phase III vacating process is now g4% . completed. , Due to the near completion of all Phase III relocation closings, this June issue`of the Buryou� Update wiil be the last issue to report Phase III relocation closings. AUCTI�N/DEMOLI'I'ION UpiDATE As of Auction #5, a total of 121 homes have been sold through auctions previously held. 75 homes have sold from Phase I, 37 homes from Phase II and 9 homes from Phase IlI. _ ; Ro''und One of the demolition process included a total of 97 houses. This included 6'7 houses from Phase I, 27 house§ from Phase II and 3 houses` from P.hase ILI. � ; �UYOUT ' FEEDBACK Q• When I move to my relocation hoxne, `may I take ' the storage ' shed at my acquisihon properly___with_me. -- --:.. ___ ___ _ _ ._.�:.___ . A• Any items that are attached to the property such `as light fixtures or' storage ___ sheds .. are --considered in th� appraisal; therefore, the items cannat : be considerec( ' personai properly. MAC can only paY to' '� . move personal property, If a homeawner would like to take 'an item that is not personal property, they must list it on the urchase P . agreement `addendum _ an� �„�ve _. _:::. AGENDA REGULAR MEETING % EAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY CUUNCIL CHAMBERS EAGAN CITY HALL July 9, 1996 7:00 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND A.DOPTION OF AGENDA II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES �ii. vii�i`l�u�� i'u �� ;�ii��► A. Invited Guests - ENAC Representative Tom Monahan IV. OLD BUSINESS V. NEW BUSINESS A. Noise Compatibility Policies VI. OTHER BUSINESS , VII. WORKSHOP REPORT fi A. Nightti�e Operations - Shoulder Hours B. Aircraft Noise Legal Consultation C. July Workshop 1Vleeting VIII. STAFF REPORT A. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles B. MSP Mitigation Committee C. Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor D. MASAC Meeting of June 25 �. ivorcnern ii�aKota �ounty Airport iZeYations Coaiition IX. INFORMATIVE X. FUTURE AGENDA XI. NEXT COMMISSION MEETING - 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 13 NEXT COMMISSION WORKSHOP - 7:00 p.m. Thursday, Ju�y is NEXT MASAC MEETING - 7:30 p.m. Tuesday, July 23 �I• �JOURNMENT Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 faours. If a notice of less tlaan 96 hours is received, tlae City of Eagan will attempt to provide , such aid. i � C., {_ � 0 � s I`r t l'' °" i'^+ r' �,y I�(��i�' II� �� .. . i'� � �� I�I�� i, �� (.::i� �i'�I�.i �I ��I�.,�I.II�I! i ��.��aWu�_m�__�_ � , �.��„ �iii�,,, mddm ' MEMO city of eagan TO: NORTHERfV D/�KOTA COUNTY AiRPORT RE�ATIONS COALITION FRONI: ASSISTAPIT TO 'TIiE CITY ADNIIMtISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN DATE: JUNE 24, 1996 ,- SUBJECT: EAGAN CORRIDOR RESOLUTION At the most recent NDCARC meetin�, �e �i��usse�: +";� ��ch�d � cSviucivi i s�iur-��i'cau to MAC and the FAA by the City of Eagan. The resolution is in response to declining corridor compiiance and increased resident complaints about eariy turns, short final approaches and low overflights. Piease caii if you have any questions. . .� � sistant to the City Administrator .Y CITY OF EAGAN 'i � � • � • �.� � . ,, �. .. � � • 1 � • � • • � �� WHEREAS, the City of Eagan, in cooperation with t� Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission and Federal Aviation t�dmiaustration, planned and implemented an area of noise-compatible land use along in the northern part of the community which is part of the Eagan-Mendota Heights Aircraft Conidor, a.nd WHEREAS, the City based the area and location of the Corridor land uses on representations by these agencies regarding aircraft overflights and noise impacts, and WHEREAS, the City has actively encouraged the development of l�n�. »se� :� *He �::�i��r which are compatible with these representations and prevented the development of land uses which are incompatible through ongoing improvements to its comprehensive plan, denial of incompat:ble rezoning applications and reinforcement of resid�ntial development outside the Corridor, and WHEREAS, the coexistence of the airport with neighboring communities relies on the effective management of air traffic in areas where it was planned to be absorbed, and WHEREAS, the residential areas of the City of Eagan have experienced a disproportionate increase in the impacts of aircraft overflights due to operations outside of the parameters established for the corridor, including a-s�ubling of the percentage �of Corridor excursions since December, 1994, and WHEREAS, the MAC`and FAA have the equipment and resources necessary to more effectively monitor and control the operation of aircraft southeast of the airport, including an automated radar tracking system, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan, on behalf of its residents, demands that the FAA and MAC comply with the operational standards set for the corridor, io eiiminate jei aircrait departures soutn oi the Fcunway 29i., Iocalizer within three miles of the runway end and to require all jet aircraft arrivals to make at least a four mile final approach to the 29 runways. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: � � � Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. Van �Overbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembleti tnis 4ti� ciay oi June, i9yo. � -. � � � E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan � � �� _ Th e Metro I i_ � ' . p -� ta n Ae rcra t i� ' t �I The purpose of this pamphlet is to provide background information and a description of the functions and activities of the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASACj. .. . The Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council �MASAC) is a p�i- vate, nonp�ofit organization, made up of an equal number of citizens and airline industry representatives, dedi- cated to the contro) and alleviation of aircraft noise.at and around the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport (MSPj. Since its inception in ' 1969, MASAC has served in many capacities, including advising the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MACj, evaluating established ngise policies, recommending and ins,tftuting a� • • . .' Aircraft noise is not new. In the earliest days of the airport, neighbor- hoods nearby were not greatly affect ed by the occasional planes overhead. But by the mid-1960s, as communities expanded and air travel increased, aircraft noise surfaced as a major community concern. Public dis- content increased, and the cities adja- cent to MSP began to take action against the MAC. In 1968, 400 pea ple crowded into a Minneapolis City new policies, and studying noise abatement programs in use around the world. The effectiveness of MASAC is due primarily to the composition'of its membership. The problem of aircraft nois.e is approached �rom �all view � points by combining the technical expertise and� aviation experience of airline industry personnel, with the firsthand k�gwledge and concern of communiiy members. MASAC was the first noise abatement program in the country to bring together these diverse Council meeting to demand passage of a proposed ordinance which would prohibit aircraft from flying over the city. Other communities held public hearings and threatened the MAC with lawsuits if the issue of aiccraft noise was not immediately addressed. Amid growing public pressure, the MAC began to realize that successful noise abatement required the efforts of many people both inside and outside the aviation industry. The creation of interests, and its unique format has served as a model for other noise con- trol groups around the world. There are no �simple answers to the problem of ai�craR noise. MASAC believes that continued communication and cooperation is the key to increased understanding among all those concerned with noise cont�ol. Innovations in the area of noise abatement and improvements to existing noise relief policies are the result oF this continuing cooperative effort. MASAC was a di�ect result of commu- nity frustration and the need for a group to provide the MAC with addi- tional advice and support For noise abatement programs. The first members of MASAC, both citizens and aviation industry rep- resentatives, were familia� with the problems of aircraft noise. The board was composed of 26 representatives, equally divided between members of the aviation industry, and individuals , �, � � � MASAC Metropolitan Metropol� an : ' °. � � Aircraft Sound Airports ° '. Abatement Councii Commission ;� � representing the communities sur- rounding the airport. Mayor Stan Olson of Richfield was appointed as the first chairman �of MASA,C and lloyd Hinton, formerly head of the National Airc�aR Noise Abatement Council, was hired as the first execu- tive director. � The council immediately began to review and evaluate abatement poli- cies, as well as new programs a�d techn:ques to aid in noise relief. 4ne of its first actions was to �request�fhe _ � � • MASAC was formally incorporat- ed as a nonprofit organization February 25,1969. Its commitment to community ser�ice is clearly outlined in both the articles of i�corporation and the bylaws. With the goal of reducing airc�aft noise, as wel) as increasing public knowledge and � awareness surrounding the issue, there are three gene�al objectives of MASAC: • The first objective of MASAC regards tMe study and evaluaty' o`n of complaints from neighborin�.,kesi- dents. This is accomplished through a complaint phone (ine which is in oper- ation 24 hours a day. Each complaint is recorded and filed by the MAC noise staff. At the end of each month, the file is reviewed and statistics are compiled as to the number and loca- tion of all complaints received. The . results are then presented at the monthly MASAC meeting. The full Commission also receives copies of the report. This process allows the MAC and MASAC to ascertain the extent of the noise problem in specific areas. It also provides the communiy with direct access to the MAC and MASAC. � The second objective is the real- ization of an effective noise abatement program at MSP. MASAC is �esponsi- 2 addition �of a noise abatement special- ist to the staff of the MAC, a position which was created the following year. MASAC established a complaint line to handle calls and to provide informa- tion to the communiiy. The first of 21 noise abatement policies was estab-� I'ished in 1969, and plans were made for an extensive study on the effects of ai�craft noise pollution. As MASAC matured, its inNuence and �eputation grew: lt joined nafional noise abate- ment organizations and senied as an MASAC Chairman Scott Bunin eand �loomengton representa- tive Mark PAahon discuss a pro- posed runway construction project and its �noise impact on surrounding communities. ble for the study and evaluation of existing naise abaternent policies and the proposal and initiation of new pra grams. This requires that all council members be wel) informed on a wide range of noise abatement �procedures and plans. In order to keep abreast of the most recent technical innovations and noise relief programs, MASAC holds membership in national and advisory board to other groups around the country. The success bf . MASAC can be measured in its uni- � versally recognized noise abafement efForts and its structure as a model used by other airports around the wor,ld. Through the cooperation dnd the commitmecat of many declicated individuals, MASAC continues to effect changes and improvements in the area of aircraft noise relief. regional noise abatement organiza- tions. The council also sponsors its own �esearch and study progra.ms and sends MASAC representatives to noise abatement conferences. The MASAC remains one of the few noise abate- ment groups in the country to.take such an active role in initiating and coordinating airport programs. The ( purpose of MASAC, as `stipulated in � its bylaws, is to continue this role and to ensure that every possible measure is taken towa�ds the reduction of ai� craft noise. • A final objective of MASAC is to conduct a program of public educa- tion. MASAC sponsors public meet ings and informationa) .sessions to explain current noise abatement poli- cies and to discuss the possibilities for future programs. Topical publications, inedia releases, and paid advertise- ments are also used to aid in public education regarding the more specific aspects of noise control. Considering the importance and economic necessi- ty of MSP, MASAC�believes that an understanding must be established between the airport and the surround- ing communities. While the awation industry must be sensitized to the importance of noise abatement, the community also must be willing to - cooperate in noise control efforts. It is , 1 ! the �esponsibility of MASAC to inform the public on the variety of noise abatement techniques, methods, pro- cedures, and regulations which exist or which are being considered by the MAC and the FAA. MASAC also pro- vides information regarding zoning proposals and other (and use regula- tions •which keep future residential. developments from noise sensitive areas and which offer alternatives for more compatible (and uses: In addi- tion, national and worldwide noise,; abatement programs are presented' and discussed with city governments and civic groups in order to provide the public with a wide range of possi- bilities for �educing noise in their com- munities. The MASAC board now is com- posed of 32 members, divided equal- Noise abatement is the primary goal of all MASAC activity. MASAC has established a number of programs and policies, in coordination with the MAC, aimed at reducing or alleviat- ing aircraft noise both on the ground and in the air. Noise control is gene� ally accomplished in three ways,� � Development of operatio�ial policies and regulations designed to alleviate or lessen noise from approaching and departing aircraft. • Development of compatible land uses planned for the areas immediate- ly surrounding the airport. MASAC works with city officials and communi- ty organizations to develop plans for alternative land uses in areas most affected by aircraft noise. Specia) zon- ing regulations ensure that residential development is kept to a minimum in noise sensitive areas. In addition, plans to relocate maintenance work and to (essen other sources of ground' noise have been formulated. • Continued researcli and devel- opment in aviation technology made possible a new gen.eration:of quieter ly betwee.n representatives from the aviation industry, or user groups, and private citizens, the public group. The user group includes 1 i representatives �rom airlines serving MSP, and one representative from each of the follow- ing: The Minnesota�Business AircraR Association, the Air Line Pilots Association, the MAC, the St. Paul Chambe� of Commerce, and the Greater Minneapolis Area Chamber of Commerce. The public group �is made up of four representatives from Minneapolis, three from St. Paul, two each from Richfield and. Bloomington, and one each from Burnsville, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota Heights and St. Louis Park. The number of �epresen- tatives from each ciiy is based on pop- ulation and the size of the area and more fuel efficient aircraR. MASAC works with the airlines to encou�age the use of these new jets. Retrofitting, a process which works to mufFle thee� ine noise of older jets, is a second a�ternative in use for lessen- ing aircraft noise at the source. The MAC and MASAC have developed and instituted a wide vari- eiy of noise abatement policies since 1969. MASAC has also sponsored numerous public information sessions and has acted as an advisor to many community and governmental groups. An extensive MAC study on noise abatement, completed in 1981, was the result of a MASAC proposal, and the members contributed greatly to its development. The organization has made many other contributions to the alleviation of aircraft noise. • As a result of a MASAC propos- al, all airline training flights have been eliminated at the Minneapolis/St. Paul airporf. • Under the guidance of MASAC and the M/�C, MSP was the first ai� afFected by aircraft noise. Industry.rep- resentatives are appointed by agen- cies, corporations, associations, and goverrimental bodies which have a direct interest in the operation of the Minneapolis/St. Paul airport. The pub- lic representatives are appointed by their local gQvernments. MASAC board members serve on a voluntary basis and are uncompen- sated by the organization. Funding for research, stafF work, travel, equipment and supplies is provided by the Metropolitan Airports Commission. A detailed description of the. . MASAC organization and its specific functions is included in the articles of incorporation and the MASAC bylaws. Both are available upon request. port to implement a workable Preferential Runway System (PRS). The PRS was modified in 1990 to allow greater use of Runway 4-22 in off-peak traffic periods to provide increased noise relief for South Minneapolis residents. • Through an agreement with al) scheduled airlines, a voluntary night time flight rest�iction has been institut ed from 11 pm-bam. • Home-based carriers developed procedures to keep planes at higher glide slope altitudes on approach over residential areas. �• An ea�th-berm noise barrier was constructed to decrease noise for a residential area which borders the air- port. � Engine run-ups and other main- tenance procedures are now restricted to only daytime hours and are con- ducted in a special run-up pad area to help contain jet noise. • Procedures were established with the FAA to disperse air traffic over a wider area�to avoid a heavy concentration of noise over any one � 3 � particular area. • Several arriva) and departure routes, or tracks, have been devel- oped to ensure that aircraft o,perations are conducted over the� least populat ed areas whenever possible. • Signs have been placed on all runways to remind pilots to utilize noise abatement procedures. + Automated Termina) Information System (ATIS� radio broadcasts inform pilots of noise sensitive areas. • Special instrument landing . equipment has been installed to �%' ensure a more stabilized approach over residential areas. ,'� 4 • An extensive program for moni- toring and evaluating aircrdR noise is done by the MAC and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The list of MASAC accomplish- ments is extensive. MASAC is regard- ed as a(eader in noise abatement and communiiy service and the Minneapolis/St. Paul International Airport is recognized as a model for other airports attempting to institute noise control programs. The key to success is that MASAC efforts are ongoing. The commitment of those both inside and outside the aviation industry, including the.FAA, the�MAC, -:� airline industry personnel, and a num- ber of private citizens and public offi- cials, have helped to make MASAC ( an effective organization._ � MASAC meetings, which ar,e open to the public, are generally held on the fourth Tuesday of each month at 7:30 pm in the Metropolitan Airports Commission Genera) Offices building, located at 6040 28th Avenue South in Minneapolis. If you have questions or would like additional information, please call the MASAC ofFice at 726-9411. PRINTED ON � RECYCLED PAPER' . 1/91`