Loading...
08-14-1996 ARC Packetr r CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUIVTY, fv11NNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIOtVS COiVIMISSiON AGEIVDA August 14, 1996 - 7 p.rn. - Large �Conference Room �. Call to Order - 7 p.m, . 2. Roll Call 3. �aApproval of June 12, 1996 Meeting Minutes. Approval of July 10, 1996 Meeting Minutes. 4. Unfinished and iVew Business: (Memos availabie on Monday) a. Discuss MSP Mitigation Efforts and Letter to Dakota Couniy b. Recommendation to City Councii on 1996 Mendota Heights Airport Pian of Action c. Discuss Survey of �4irport Communities on Air Noise ::.,� d. Discuss Resiclent's Petition on PART 150 Sound insulation 5. Uqdates a• Review Non Simultaneous Departure Procedures b. Review Noise Abatement Departure Profiles 6. Acknowledae Receint of i/ario�s Reaorts/Corres�ondence a• MASAC Agenda for July 23, 1996 and June 25,1996 Minutes b• MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for June 1996 c. MASAC Complaint Summary for June 1996 d• MASAC Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for June 1996 e. Part 150 Buyout Updafie - Issue 31 f. SMAAC Newsletter for the August 1996 g. Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition Minutes of July 16, 1996 � M � � h. MAC Part 150 Policy Advisory Committe Agenda for August 9, 1996 and Minutes of May 7, 1996 �. Backsliding Letter of July 22. 1996 to Jennifer Sayre of Northwest (- � \ Airlines j. StarTribune Articie on Extension of Runway 422 k. Eagan ARC Agenda for August 13, 1996 7. Other Comments or Concerns. 8. Adjourn. Auxiliary aids for disabied persans are available upon request at least 120 � hours in advance. If a notice of tess than 120 hours is received, the City of IVlendota Heights wiit make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. P!ease cor�tact C'rty Aclministrat�on at 452-1850 with rec{uests. � �' � � 1 � �. .1 ' '.. 1 . � .. � ,�,� � , A�ItP�RT RELATIONS COMaV�[SSION JiJ.l� 12, 1996 The regular meeti.ng of the Mendota. Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, 7une 12, 1996, in the City Hall Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeti.ng was called to order at 7:10 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Bea.ty, Leuman, Stein and Surrisi. The following members were excused: Gross, Fitzer and Olsen. `' �A1so present were City Administrator Kevin Batchelder and Recording Secretary Cazla Wirth. Beaty and the Comnnissioners congratulated Batchelder on his recent appointment as City Administrator. Batchelder introduced Car1a, Wirth, the Recording Secretary for the next three months. Beaty commented that the Friday News should include the Airport Relations Commission's agenda.to alert Councilmembers their items of discussion. .,�•� � �� Commissioner Leuman moved approval of the May 8, 1996 minutes. Commissioner Stein seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAY5s 0 .� � � " �, � .• � . ,�, �,, ,� � Sa. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC May 23, 1996, and Apri123, 1996, Minutes. Sb. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Technic.al Advisor's Report for Apri11996 (Incomplete). Bea,ty explai.ned the report is incomplete due to an equipment failure. ` Sc. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the May 21, 1996, minutes of the Northern Dakota. County Airport Relations Coalition. Bea.ty noted a major topic of discussion was backsliding and NWA's fleet mix of Stage II and Stage III aircraft. Beaty stated the percenta.ge of Sta.ge III use has declined since September of 1985. Batchelder sta.ted that prior to the next meeting of the Coalition, each city is to bring its list of mitigation efforts so discussion can take pla.ce on what to sapport as a group. Dakota County will then be approached to determine their support level. On June 26, 1996, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, St. Paul and Minnea.polis will be making its presentation to the MSP Mitigation Committee. Mendota Heights already made its presentation but reserved the right to make an addition, if desired. Stein indicated an interest in flying the two departure profiles via the NWA test simulator at NATCO. The Commission indicated an interest in participating and requested Batchelder to schedule this event. Sumsi advised of Sun Country simulator �'test hours. 5d. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Part 150 Buyout Update - Issues 28 and 29. Se. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Operations Minutes and Agenda for May 24, 1996. Batchelder explained that Mendota Heights has submitted. updated household and population counts for MA.C's consultant to work into the calculation; however, several meetings were canceled and City staff was not notified of the outcome until just prior to the May meeting. At the meeting, Narthwest Airlines and Bob �� � 7ohnson of MASAC presented new population counts and noise profiles. He reviewed this data and noted Mendota. Heights' statistics for distant departures show a popula.tion .,.. count of 1,580 in the DNL60 contour and 1,180 in the DNL65; however, the close-in departure statistics show population counts of 1,840 in the DNL60 and 900 in the DNL65 contours. Beaty sta.ted these sta.tistics are impossible. Batchelder concurred and stated staff has submitted current household and popula.tion counts to the MAC. Discussion ensued regazding the distance procedure and DNL contours for the close-in departure procedure versus the distance pmcedure. Batchelder raised the concern, at the MASAC meeting, regarding t�e validity of the data used in their decision. Batchelder expla.ined Mendota. Heights had indica.ted in the past they would like to try the close-in departure procedure to see if it will reduce noise. He sta.ted Mendota Heights should consider an operational change if the close in departure procedure wi11 reduce noise levels over Mendota Heights. Beaty noted the indication that the benefit will be over Minneapolis but the MASAC intends to run the same take off procedures over Mendota. Heights. � �. Batchelder pointed out that with DNL60, the distance departure procedure is better for %, Mendota Heights but with DNL65, it is worse. He sta.tecl he believes the population counts used in the DNL65 calcula.tions are correct, but the counts used in the DNL60 calculations are not, especially for the close in depariures. Batchelder noted the MASAC Operations Committee recommenda.tion for the "Distant Community Departure Profile" utilization on runways 11L/R and runways 4/22 and the "Close-in Community Departure Profile" utilization on runways 29I./R passed on a split 5-2 vote. Batchelder informed the commission that because 7ill Smith raised concern about the calcula.tions and commented on the ANOMS system (which generates the noise contours) at the MASAC meeting, they tabled it to their June meeting. Smith has suggested the MASAC base their decision on accurate information and should use ANOMS data., Batchelder noted the location of the additional population counts as shown by MAC for the close in departures would be in the Dodge Nature Center. The Commission questioned the need for a hasty decision on such an important issue and indica.ted support to test this method to see if it will help. They concurred with Smith's belief it would be better to use ANOMS data, rather than a household count. Batchelder pointed out a discrepancy in the MASAC meeting minutes (middle of page 3) which indicates "the number of dwellings do coincide with the population count" when, in fact, they do not coincide, which was pointed out at the meeting. The Commission requested that this information be presented to Councilmember Jill Smith who can discuss the household and population data, discrepancies at the next MASAC meeting. She will alsa urge them to use ANOMS data. instead. Consensus was rea,ched to request Batchelder to supply Councilffiember Smith with this information and submit a press release regarding the City's concern with this hasty MASAC decision and with the data used in its consideration. GENI+;RAL DISCYTS5ION Ken and Mary Weisenbuger, residents of Friendly Hills, asked if airport noise will increase in their neighborhood and whether their neighborhood is eligible for soundproofing. Batchelder advised that the current Part 150 Sound Insulation Program is based on DNL65 which does not extend to the Friendly Hills area. Ken Weisenburger commented on the noise of aircraft which results in loss of their ability to enjoy the outdoors, especially during the summer months. Beaty reviewed the Commission's history and attempts to resolve these concerns as well as procedural changes. 3 �. � Batchelder advised that the Mayor presented the City's position that the Part 150 Sound Insnlation Program should be extended. to the DNL65 area at the June 3, 1996 MSP � Mitigation Committee meeting. � : .�k 1./ �►�� �►, YK��'Y':M ��t��'�I �. 5f. The Commission acknowledged the City of Eagan - ARC Agendas for May 14, May 23, and June 11, 1996. Sg. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the SMAAC Newsletter for May, 1996. Beaty requested his name be pla.ced on the mailing list for this Newsletter. Batchelder explai.ned issuance is irregular but staff will provide copies of the SMAAC Newsletter whenever it is published. Sh. ��'he Commission acknowledged receipt of the Sta�Tribune Article of June 4, 1996, on MSP Mitigation Committee. Si. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Zoning News Article, "The Trouble with Airports. " Batchelder pmvided a brief synopsis of the articles contained within. Stein requested a copy of the `Airport Noise Report"by Anne H. Kohut. Weisenburger expressed concern regardi.ng sta.bility of property values due to this increasing levels of airport noise. �. Weisenburger expressed his interest in this issue and volunteered to help get information out to residents. Surrisi suggestecl an informational handout be considered to better inform residents. She also suggested considera.tion of signage in various ,� neighborhoods and possibly to support a"walk" at the auport which will result in media. coverage. - Beaty commented on the hesitancy to "raise red flags" due to concern with a drop in overall housing valuations which is what happened in south Minneapolis. Batchelder suggested the meeting agenda be rearr.anged so consideration is first given to Unf'uiished and New, Business to assure these action items receive proper time. Consensus was reached to try this new format at the next meeting with the various reports and conespondence being considered as "Update Items" . 1, 1, /1 , '.1 0 , �, ,�, , , � - ;�' Batchelder requested input from Commissioners regardi.ng any change they would like made to this dra.ft including prioritization of Topics of Interest, if desired. 0 fi Bea,ty suggested Mendota. Heights representation on MAC and MASAC be added since it in the Plan of Action. Consensus reached. Stei.n reqnested that prevention of the north parallel third runway be pla.ced back on the Topics of Interest as item 16. Consensus reached. Discnssion was held with ea.ch Commissioner indicating their priority topics with the following consensu�s rea.ched: 1. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures. 2. Global Positioni.ng Satellite Technology (Implemented 1995-96). 4. Nighttime Restrictions on Aircraft Operations. 9-10. Noise Measurement Issues - Usefiulness of Ldn 65 Contour and Equity of Current Runway Use System; and P.xpansion of MAC Aircraft Noise Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS). 13. Equity of Current Runway Use System. The following topics will be added to the list: 15. MAC and MSAC Representa.tion. 16. Prevention of Third Parallel Runway. 17. Noise Abatement Departure Profiles. Batchelder used a map to review the tower headings for the two runways during non- simultaneous departures and change of degrees due to a shift in magnetic headings wluch results i.n more airplane activity over Mendota Heights' residential areas versus industrial areas. Mendota. Heights would like to continue to pursue a centerline headi.ng which will keep the flight pattem over industrial areas. Beaty noted this was discussed at the last meeting but the Commission determi.ned not to worry about the magnetic shift, at this time, and to focus on the crossing pattern. Consensus was reached to direct sta.ff to draft a letter to the FAA-Great Lakes Region outlining the lvstory of the enforcement issae since 1992 with copies to local staff, Representative Bruce Vento, Senator Paul Wellstone, and Senator Rod Grams to upda.te them of these issues and for consideration by the Mayor and Council. Consensas was also rea.ched to add this action to the Plan of Action. 5 �. � The Commission then reviewed and discussed ea.ch of the issues, goals, and action steps in the Air Noise Plan of Action, narrowing the corridor, and need to enforce � operational procedures. They suggested City staff scan radio tower communications to monitor transmissions to assure they comply with opera.tional procedures. Consensus was reached to modify the Air Noise Plan of Action, Page 7, #5, December through February, to invite Senators and Representatives to meetings to hear concerns - add date. Surrisi questioned the option of declaring the wetland as a protected area within the proposed path of the third runway area. The Commission requested Batchelder research consultants who have expertise in this area. Beaty requested that Batchelder assign dates to the action steps. With regard to ��backsliding, Batchelder suggested a joint discussion between communities where the facts can be laid out and then addressed at an upcoming MASAC meeti.ng. The Commission directed Batchelder to finalize the Mendota. Heights Airport Plan of Action for consideration at the July 16, 1996, meeting. / i i' i � 1 1 i � �; � � �, � . � The Commission complimented Mayor Mertensotto on the Airport Noise Mitigation Position Statement and letter he prepared. Batchelder noted. they did reserve the right ` -�. to present additional information to the MSP Mitigation Committee. Beaty inquired regardi.ng the need to establish a corridor boundary so it can be determined if Mendota. Iieights supports a narrowing of the comdor. Surrisi raised the option of flying the Ri�er in and out. Beaty extended the Commission's apprecia.tion to the Ma.yor for his active role in tlus important issue. Chairman Bea.ty moved to support the City of Mendota Heights Airport Noise Mitigation Position Statement and encoura.ge the Council to pursue it. Commissioner Leuman seconded the motion. AYES: 4 NAYS: 0 The Commission reviewed the MSP Runway Configuration Use and noted it indicates Mendota Heights receives 44 % of the takeoff activity. Beaty requested Batchelder � � ,. 6 � ( ; � determine how the 2005 DNL contour information was derived and how it will be aclueved. The benefit of more modern equipment was noted as well as sprea.di.ng out air traffic once the new runway is completed. The Comm.ission requested Batchelder find out the heading for 11 L daring construction of Runway 11 R. � t • c� � 1 r �. � • ►•� r . Batchelder stated he will inform Jill Smith regarding this issue, as discussed. IDISC�JSS BACKSY,�IDING AND h1WA �ET COr�VF.I2SION PLAN Batchelder reviewed the history of NWA's Noise Agreements at MSP and stated he will infotm Jill Smith and the Northern Dal�ota. County Airport Rela.tions Coalition about this topic. Surrisi commented it would be interesting to review the Noise Agreements which NWA presents to other communities. The Commission next reviewed the NWA Sta.ge III Compliance Plan. The Commission r�quested Batchelder draft a letter under the Mayor's signature to the NDCARC for review at the nelct meeting and encourage all Dakota County communities to send a similar letter at the same time. �� � � � � � �. � � �. � � � The Commission reviewed the non simultaneous departure procedures. ' �' � � ' � , �, � � , :�' : :� :� '� ; � , ,. The Commission reviewed the Community Air Noise Update in the Mendota Heights Highlites. 1 ;� � � � ��! � , � . Stein commented on the DC-9's which are equipped with a hush kit and stated there is a definite difference (reduction) in the noise generated. �7 � 0 0 Stein inquired when a fieldtrip tour of the City will be scheduled. The Commission requested Batchelder schedule an evening tour and Stein ask whether a school bus can be used. Surrisi advised she will not be able to attend the next meeting and will check with her off'ice to see if they receive copies of the Airport Noise Report . If so, she wi11 provide the City with a copy. Stein stated he may not be present at the July meeting, r:��� a; .u� e .� There being no further comments, the Airport Relations Commission moved to adjourn ``its meeting at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Carla M. Wirth Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secret�urial _ ...... .. ..... .... . ... . ..._... .._._ . .._.._ ..... _...... ... ... . � C. CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUIVTY, MINNESC2TA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION JULY 10, 1996 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was heid on Wednesday, July 10, 1996 in the City Ha10 Large Conference Room,1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting foliowed a special 7:00 o'clock P.NA. City Council Airport Relations Commission meeting tour of air noise impacted areas of Mendota Heights and was calied to order at 9:27 o'clock P.M. The following members were present: Beaty, Fitzer, Gross, Leuman, Olsen, and Stein. The foliowing member was excused: Surrisi. The following members were absent: None. Also present were City Administrator Kevin Batchelder and Recording Secretary Carla Wirth. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Leurnan moved approval of the May 8,1996 minutes. Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion. AYES: 6 NAYS: 0 DISCUSS NOISE ABATENIENT , DEPARTURE PROFILES Batchelder reviewed that at the June 25, 1996, MASAC Meeting, they agaire considered the recommendation from the MASAC Operations Committee that "Close-In" departure procedures be used only for departures off 29L and 29R over Minneapolis. Ali other runways wroulcl continue to use the "Distant'° departure procedure. However, MASAC did not act on this recommendation at their May or June meetings and carried it forward for further consideration since there is concern over the data used for population and household counts, as well as other concerns by surrounding communities. Batchelder reviewed that at the June meeting, the Airport Relations Commission had directed staff to assist Councilmember Jill Smith in her meetings with MASAC. Tomorrow they will meet with MAC representatives to Iook, in detail, at population and household counts. it is hoped this will enable the determination of the accuracy of the data and result in being more precise t� �� about the affect of the proposed departure profiles. 1 �. Beaty commented on the different c8eparture procedures and benefit received when planes get to a higher altitude more quickly. He inquired regarding why this has not been seriously discussed. Olsen stated it may be an issue where � the airlines are concerned with cost. Fitzer stated he does not know how much additional fuei it would take, but maybe it has not been considered because the population towards Minneapolis is higher than over Mendota Heights. Beaty asked that this question be posed to MASAC. Batchelder statec! he would do so and advised that Eagan consiciered a resolution in support of Close-In Departures. DISCUSS MENDOTA HEIGHTS AIRPORT PLAN OF ACTION Batchelder reviewed the prioritized Topics of Interest list and the two changes made since the last meeting to the Air Noise Plan of Action. He advisec! the follow up letter to the FAA was added and is almost ready but the FAA said they wouid no# be able to address this issue for two months. This letter will also be copied to Mendota Heights' congressmen and legislators. Batchelder noted the second revision on page 7, a date was added to invite legislatures to attend a meeting in December/January. 6atchelcler acOvised that d.ue to scheduling conflicts, the Airport Plan of Act6on wi61 not be presented to the City Councii until August 20,1996. Therefore, the �„ Airport Relations Commission will have the opportunity to review it at their August meeting, prior to Council presen$ation. � The Commission complemented staff on their preparation of this presentation. DISCUSS NOOSE MITIGATION COMiUIITTEE AND CITY EFFORTS Batchelder reported the MSP Mitiga$ion Committee met again on June 26,1996, at which time Inver Grove Heights, Eagan, Minneapolis, and St. Paul gave their presentations on Noise Mitigation. He noted their agenda, discussion outline, and chart detailing different city's positions expressed before the MSP Mitigation Committee. He pointed out under the operational column, that four to five cities have broughtforward the issue of equitable distribution of air noise. He suggested that the Runway Use System is outdated and needs to be updated. Beaty urged members to read the Mendota Heights Position Statement which was presented in June to the MSP Mitigation Committee. He noted it does include the suggestion to modify runways b�at he supports adding, as Eagan did, to require four miles for landing to avoid'°cut ins'° during non-busy time �` 2 periods. Beaty stated fVlendota Heights may want to determine their position regarding that issue. Batchelcler advised he met with Eagan staff to establish issues which all cities agree on. Hopefully at August meeting, a coalition list will be ready to discuss with Dakota County to seek their support> Gross inquired regarding the future impact of the global positioning satellite system (GPS). 6atche0der explained that GPS is capable of pinpointing and getting airplanes to track. Currently, the airport uiilizes a straight lineup for arrivals and Mendota Heights wants to avoid the need for a turning movement for arrivals. Gross questioned wl�ether, if this is the way of the future, Mendota Heights should fight it or, perhaps, it woulcD be better to compromise on that position to gain something else. Fitzer expressed concern with an air pattern so close that it results in a sharp ar�-ival. He agreed that the GPS technology would ailow this but he quest6ons how tne airiine intends to utilize it. Fitzer �aointed out the airlines will be able to have a tighter area of impact which may save them money. Gross questioned the strength of the community°s position. Batchelder agreed this is why communities need to reach a coalition statement and gain assistance from Dakota County. He noted that Mendota Heights has not had this �� opportunity before, to submit information before the tVISP Mitigation Committee and cautioneci there may not be another such opportunity for some time. He emphasizec! the data on the chart and stated he is encouraged about the indicaiion from MAC that operational changes can be beneficiale Since technology is available through GPS to have a five mile turn-in, Fitzer suggested it may be to Menclota Height's advantage to start discussions now so there will be no planes allowed to turn in within ien mi0es, or five mile final. Leuman questioned the issue of using north/south runway and suggested it be brought up. Batchelder noted Eagan's Noise Mitigation Program indicates there would be 100% federal PART 150� participation for noise abatement the within 60 DNL, then the next area would receive a 50/50 spiit, etc. He noted this pian incorporates a phased level of benefit, not such a severe cutoff line between areas. Beaty agreed it is more of a phase-out plan. 5a. REVIEW NON SIMU�TANEOUS DEPARTURE PROCEDURES �� _ , � No comrr�ent. 3 � �. 5b. REVIEW BACKSLIDING AND 1VWA F�EET COiVVERSION PLAN Batchelder explained that he was in the process of preparing a letter to � iV1AC regarding backsliding but the Stage 111 Report, recently given to the MSP Committee, indicates the percentages are not as bad as thought. Batchelder advised that the agreement_NWA has with MAC is for no backsiiding on a ear0 basis, not month to-month, and that their use of Stage I I I at this airport will be no less than their fleet mix nation-wide. However, this is difFicult to calculate because of how their airpianes are used (long haul). Batchelder suggested sending a letter to Jennifer Sayers (who works with public information for NWA) requesting that this percentage data be .prepared separately for NWA since they are the only airlines which has agreed not to backslide. Also, this will put NWA on notice that Mendota Heights is watching their fleet mix. Once this information is known, the City can decide if a letter should be sent to MAC regarding backslideng. Consensus was reached to concur with Batchelder's suggestions. ACKNOWLE�GE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS REPORTS/CORRESPOfVDENCE (: 6a. The Commission acknowiedged receipt of the MASAC Agenda for June 25,1996 and May 28,1996 Minutes. ��.. 6b. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Technical Advisor°s report for May,1996. 6c. The Commission acknowleclgec! receipt of the MASAC Complaint Summary for May,1996. 6d. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for IUlay,1996. . 6e. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Ai�port Noise Reportfor May 27,1996. Olsen commented on page 78 which shows the dollar amount that different cities spend for various noise mitigation features such as b0ast fencing, noise berms, vegetation and plantings, and questioned whether the Minneapolis Airport is "up to speed" on noise attenuation or if more could be done in that regard. Batchelder stated he will follow_up_on what has been done to abate ground noise. ( 4 � . 6f. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Part 150 Buyout Update - Issue 30. 6g. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the City of Eagan - ARC Agenda for July 9, 1996. 6h. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the SunCurrent A,e#icle o�.lune 19, 1996 on Sound Onsulation. _ 6i. The Commission acknowledgecD receipt of the Eagan Corridor Resolution. 6j. The Commission acknowleclged receipt of the Airport Fact Sheet 106 - Overview of MASAC. 6k. The Corromission acknowledged receipt of the National Helicopter Noise Coalition Newsletter. OTHER COMMENTS OR CONCERNS Batchelder displayed a colored copy of the community survey which was prepared by a consultant for the MSP Committee. He reviewed the questions posed to residents and the responses given. It was noted that the most common response was the need for a free time period during the day when residents are not annoyed by airplaneso The second most comrnon response was the desire for fewer planes. � `�.. The Commissioners thanked Stein for obtaining the school bus which was used for the tour of air noise impacted areas. Batcheider indicated he will draft a letter of appreciation for the IViayor's ssgnature which will be sent to Stein°s supervisor. ADJOURNflAENT There being no further comments, the Airport Relations Commission moved to adjourn its meeting at 10:Oi p.m. . Respectfully submitted, Carla M. Wirth Recording Secretary TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial ( j i 5 � 1 11 �. •1 p August 13, 1996 To: Airport Relations Commission , From: Kevin Batchelder, City Ad '�� r Subject: MSP Mitigation Committee DISCUSSION On July 26, 1996, a package was mailed to each Commissioner containing the position statements from Minneapolis, Ea,gan, Burnsville, Bloomington, and Mendota. Heights, as well as a summary sheet prepared by MA.C. These statements were recorded during the MSP Mitigation Committee's process to make a recommendation on noise mitigation at MSP. �, The Commission was aware that the Northern Dakota. County Aiiport Relations Coalition (NDCARC) was considering a joint position statement so that Dakota County could be asked to join in the lobbying efforts on our behalf. City Council considered this item at their August 6, 1996 meeting and directed me to send a letter to the Dakota. County board. . ) (Plea.se see attached.) City Council also considered a statement of Common Issues generated by NDCARC. Council reviewed and endorsed this statement. (Please see attached statement.) The MSP Mitigation Committee's next meeting is scheduled for August 29, 1996 at 7 p.m. at the Thunderbird Hotel in Bloomington for the purpose of conducting a public hearing. The Commission should discuss an appearance at this. public hearing and any statements that Mendota. Heights may wish to make at this public hearing. Discuss the MSP Mitigation Committee's public hearing. � 1� .�,► � . e �1 t August 8, 1996 Dakota County Board of Commissioners attn: Mr. Michael Turner, Chair 1590 West I�ighway 55 Hastings, MN 55033 Dear Commissioner Turner: At the time of the County's decision on the Dual Track Airport Study, the County Board action included support for noise mitigation for Dakota. County cities wluch will be affected by the airport's expansion. The Cities of Eagan, Mendota Heights, Inver Grove fieights and Burnsville, representing more than half of the p�pulation of Dakota County, ar� cunently working with the MAC, Metropolitan Council and other cifres to identify an appmpriate scope for the mitigation of expanded operations at the international airport. The report of this group is due in mid September., It is possible that mitigation efforts may extend to other Dakota County cities such as Sunfish Lake and Mendota. as well. While the airport relocation is no longer an issue for some Dakota County residents, it remains a significant issue for thousands of others. It is important for the County to carry through with � its commitment to these residents by supporting the best possible midgation package for the airport impact area. � It is essential tbat the County advocate for an aggressive set of noise mitigation procedures and an expanded area of eligibility for the Part 150 Program. The County should also support the availability of these tools in a much larger area. than is typically the case. Our City is advocating the expansion to the 60 DNL as the area of eligibility which would apply for all mitigati.on tools, including the current Part 150 Sound Abatement pmgram. To support this effort, it is important that the County provide staff resources to the affected communities and lobbying efforts at the MAC and Legislative levels. In particular, it will be necessary to have the County's support for mitigation initiatives and operational restrictions supported by Dakota. County cities at the Mitigation Committee. It will also be essentiial that the County assist in persuading the Legislature that significant state funding, in addition to MAC funding, will be necessary to implement the noise mitigation procedures to an enlarged area.. 1 • _. . � � , . . • � ' i , . � � � Dakota. County Board of Commissioners August 8, 1996 � Page two We look forward to your participation in this effort. Please contact me at 452-1850 to discuss coordination of this effort further. - Sincerely, . CITY OF MF,NDOTA I�IGHTS Y r�,� ���,��.�... • � Ke�in Batchelder City Administratvr cc: Jon Hohenstein, City of Ea.gan Thomas Hansen, City of Burnsville Amy Briesa.cher, City of Iaver Grove Heights - �' Glenda. Spiotta., City of Sunfish Lake - Mayor 7im Toye, City of Mendota ' � l ;. y 4 DAKOTA COi;fNTY' NOISE MITIGATION COlVIN10N ISS�TL�.S The state, region and airport need to proactively plan for future noise impacts associated with the continued opera.tion and expansion of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. Progra�ms must be established, suff'iciently funded and broadly applied which will provide resources and benefits directly to noise affected residents and their communities to compensate them for the impacts of the airport, to stabilize and revitalize neighborhoods whose quality of life and value are affected by aircraft noise and to redevelop azea.s to noise compatible land uses where necessary. It is also important to implement runway use and operating standards wluch provide for an equitable distribution of noise generated by the airport. 1. State Funding/Mitigation Financing Plan - Together with the Metropolitan Airports Commission, the State of Minnesota. has an obligation to fund the mitigation of airport noise impacts as part of the actual cost of expanding the airport at its current location. Mitigation financing could include increased. landing fees, increased passenger facilities chaxges or ticket surcharges, other service charges and state bonding or general fund alloca.tions. In no case should unreimbursed imancial impacts fall on affected residents or their 1oca1 governments. �P 2. Large P.ligibility Area`with Graduated. Application of Mitigation Tools - Mitigation tools need to be available over a much broader area than has been the �� case to date and their application should be graduated or phased out at greater distances to avoid stark clifFerences in opportunities for residents at the boundaries. Certain cities are supporting a 60 DNI. plus 3-2-1 concept that suggests that all tools be available within one mile of the 60 DNL contour, some percentage or portion of the tools between one and two miles and a smaller percentage or portion between two and three miles. 3a Property Va1ue Guarantee/Purchase Assarance - A program should be available which assures that a residential. property is not devalued by noise and that residents can receive fair value for their home upon sale. Where landowners percei�e that thelr investment may be unpacted. by increased aircraft noise there anay be a disyncentive to remain in ox maintain the neighborhood and a deteriorat�on of value may occur. A program wluch guarantees the value at sale will sta.bilize neighborhoods and climuush perceived impacts. `� 4. Expanded Housing Revitaliza.tion and Stabilization Program - The current Airport Area I3ousing Revitalization and Stabilization Zone should be expanded and be made available to a11 affected residents uutially and to prospecti�e buyers° as properties are so1d. � 5. This Quiet 01d House - Homes within the airport noise impact area should be entitled to This Old House property tax deferments for sound insulation improvements. 6. Aggressive Sound Insulation - The Part 150 Sound Insula.tion Prograui is effective and very well received, but is available in an extremely limited area. It must be available over a much broader area to reflect actual unpacts of noise. 7. Residential Property Acquisition - In areas of 1ugh, chronic noise exposure, the aixport should provide for acquisition funding. The decision to seek acquisition within the neighborhoods should remain with the cities to insure that such action is consistent with the community's comprehensive plan. S. Neighborhood Enhancements - Communities should receive resources to enhance the quality of neighborhoods and help stabilize property values in affected area.s. 9< Airport Area. Community Frotection Packa.ge - The tools outlined in the d Community Protection Package including many of those mentioned above are critical to the maintenance of viable neighborhoods where it is possible and the effective redevelopment of areas where at is not. A qnalification is that it would be inappropria.te to implement another la.yer of government in the form of an airport zoning board. T1�e communities which ha.ve developed since i.mplementation of the region's aircraft noise policy have done so responsibly and will continue to do sae Local governments shonld retain the authority and be given the resources and tools to bring about airport compatibility instea.d. 10. Independent Operations 1Vionitoxuig System/Fines for Operations Viola.tions - Simil��r to the system in place at Denver International Airport, ihe MAC should install a monitoring systems wluch does not require a contractual relationship with the FA,A and enforce compliance .with appropriate operations standards. The MAC should institute a system of punitive imes for failure to comply with noise abatement procedures. 11. Additional Noise Monitors - The MAC noise monitoring system should be tripled in size to provide more coverage of actual impacts in the airport vicinity. In particular, area.s affected by the north-south runway and parallel runways should have additional uucrophone locations to monitor continued and growing ` volumes of air ta.aff'ic as the auport e�ands. 12. Base mitigat�on on Actual Impacts- Data from ANOMS and an expanded noise monitoring system should be used in place of modeled contours for all noise mitigation programs. � 13. Fund Research on the Long-Term Health Effects of Aircraft Noise - The Sta.te and the Federal government should fund research concerning the effects of / aircraft noise on residential populations. l 14. Night time Operations - The shoulder hours within which limits on operations are in place should be extended and nighttime opera.tions should be limited to State III aircraft immediately. 15. Use of the Crosswind Runway - The Runway Use System should be modif'ied to utilize Ranway 4/22 whenever possible including night time hours. � � �� i � 1 1 � • ;� , August 13, 1996 To: Auport IZelations Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, City Ad '�or � Subject: Airport Noise Plan of Action DISCUSSION The Commission has workecl on updating the Airport Noise Plan of Action over the last several months, and has scheduled the presenta.tion of the plan to the City Council at their meeting of August 20, 1996. The Commission has one more opportunity to review this document before recommending it to the City Council. . The Commission should review the Fi.nal Draft of the Air Noise Plan of Action and the � prioritized list of Topics of Interest and make any fmal conections. The Commission should decide which members should represent the Commission before the City Council on August 20, 1996. , Consider the Final Draft for revisions. Make a recommenda.tion to City Council. MINtVEAPOLIS/ST. PAl1L INTERNATIONAL AlRPORT TOPICS OF INTEREST Updated and Prioritized Juty 10, 1996 ��__ 1. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures. 2. Global Positioning Sateliite Technology (Implemented 1995-96). • 3. Prevention of Third Parailel Runway . 4. Nighttime Restrictions on Aircraft Operations. � 5. Noise Measurement Issues - a. Usefulness of Ldn 65 Contour b. Expansion of MAC Aircraft Noise Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS). 6. Equity of Current Runway Use System. 7. IVoise Abatement Departure Profiles. � 8. MSP Mitiga#ion Committee. 9. MAC and MASAC Representation. � 10. Phase Out of Noisy Stage II A�rcraft. � � �. 11. MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues - Expansion of Existing Airport. � 12. FAA Airspace Usage Study. 13 Corridor Definition/Compliance issues. 14. Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related Land Use Controls. 15. Aircraft Ground Noise During Periods of Departure Over Minneapolis. 16. Aircraft Engine Run-Up Noise. . r , � 1 � � � � . � � � � Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Implementation ofi Non-Simultaneous Takeoff Procedures Which Minimize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure Action Steps: 1. Review previous MAC representations on issue with City Council. 2. Draft letter to MAC requesting update on revised non-simulfianeous takeoff procedures - invite Mr. Hamiel to upcoming ARC meeting. 3. Depending upon response, chose appropriate means of advocating rapid implementation of new procedures. 4. Continue pursuing additional follow-up with MAC and the FAA. 5. Pursue magnetic shift affect on 105 degree heading for 11 R 6. Follow up letter to FAA Copy Legislators State and Federal � rr � Staff/ ARC Staff Staff/ ARC Staff/ ARC Staff/ ARC Staff When Completed Completed Completed Confiinuous Following NSDP Decision by FAA September m 1 � . � � � 1 � Issue: Noise Reducfiion Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Adoption of "Close-In" vs. "Distant" Takeoff Pro�edures to Reduce Noise Generation Over n/lendota Heights. � Action Steps: Who When 1. Review FAA requirements with Staff/ Completed City Council. ARC 2. Continue participation on MASAC Staff/ Completed Operations Committee which is Council currently reviewing issue. 3. City recommend what procedure should ARC/ Completed be tested. Council 4. IVIASAC reports recommendation to MAC Staff/ARC August/Sept. 1996 Planning and Environment Committee 5. MAC Planning and Environment reports StaffLARC Sept. 1996 recommendation to MAC. � � 6. MAC recommends to FAA procedure Staff/ARC ,? to be tested. 7. FAA designs flight procedure be tested. Staff/ARC ? S. FAA begins flight test. 9. City to evaluate test results and make recommendation to MAC and FAA. �7 Staff/ARC ARC/Council � 1997 � � J C C ( 1 � � � • � � � � Issue: Noise Reductian Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal; Adoption of Mandatory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights ; Action Steps: 1. Review previous MAC representations on issue with City Council. 2. Research nighttime flight restrictions imposed at other U.S. Airports. 3. Depending upon findings, prepare request to MAC for adoption of more stringent requirementse 4. Pursue designating the hours of 10:30 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., only Stage III aircraft to fly during this time period. 5. Request this issue fio be placed on MASAC Operatians Committee agenda 6e Call NOISE and inquire about U.S. Airport nighttime restrictions. 7. Pursue cessation of head-to-head operations. 3 Who When Staff/ARC Completed StafF/ARC Completed Staff/ARC Completed ARC/ Completed Council Staff Staff September 1996 September 1996 Staff/ARC Fa111996 � ti � � � � � � � � Issue: Noise Reduction Through Modified Takeoff Procedures Goal: Implementation ofi Narrowed Air Traffic Corridor which Minimizes Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure - Action Steps Who When 1. Investigate potential of Global Positioning StaffIARC Winter - 1996/97 . Satellite technology 2. Presentation to Commission on GPS by Staff Jan. 1997 MAC or other expert 3. Advocate for Maintenance of 5 mile final Staff/ARC Jan. 1997 .. arrivals and 3 mile corridor for departures 4. Pursue the benefit of updating Tower Staff/ARC Fall 1996 orders to original intent before shift in magnetic headings , C 4 �� . ��� � �� AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACT60N Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Produce and Distribute Informative Refrigerator Magnets Advertising the MAC Air Noise Complaint �ine Action Steps: 1. Investigate costs of magnet production and distribution. 2. Commission to review design. 3. Order delivered to City Hall 4. Magnets distributed to Council . .. �nd ARC. 5. Commission to review final letter and news release. 6. Magnets distributed to residents 7. Additional magnets available at City Hall upon request. 8. Continue to inform the community on ARC projects and concerns using the City's newsletter and separate single page mailings. � Who Staff ARC Staff Staff � 'Z� When Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Staff Completed � Staff � Completed Staff/ARC Continuous m � . � ■ � � � � issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goalo Expand Distribution of Air Noise Related. information Actions Steps: Who When 1. Expand mailing list for ARC agenda Staff Continuous . to include State Senators and Reps. 2. Mail letters to State Senators and Repse Staff Introducing ARC 3. Invite guests to monthly ARC meetings Staff (i.e., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State elected officials) 4. Expand coverage of air noise issues. Staff 5. Devote entire page of air noise issues Staff in the City's newsletter � Continuous Continuous (Quarterly) Continuous Quarterly 6. Continue to send press releases to Sfiaff � Continuous newspapers, State Senators and Reps. � 7o Promote air noise mitigation documente Staff/ARC Sept. 1996 C: � C �" j �'� � � � � � � Issue: Heighten Awareness of Mendota Heights Air Noise Concerns Goal: Appointment of City Residenfi to the Metropolitan Airports Commission Action Steps: 1. Review current distribution of MAC Commissioners with ARC 2. Prepare letter to gubernatorial candidafies asking for their position on MSP expansion, corridor use, MAC representation 3. Discuss City concerns with our current MAC representative 4. Monitor gubernatorial election 5. Discuss concerns with State Senators and Reps. Regarding composition of MAC. Pursue legislation to amend MAC Commissioner boundaries 6< Compare cities affected by air noise to MAC representatives 7. Review MASAC representation and MAC representation with Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Commission. 0 Who When Staff Completed Staff Completed Staff ARC/. Council Completed ` Completed Dec. 96/Jan.97 ARC/Staff March 1997 � Issue: Goal: � • � _ � ♦ � � � MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Prevent Construction of Third North Parallel Runwa.y Action Ste�s: Who 1. Update Commission on status of Staff MSP LTCP Study 2e Continue participation on MSP Staff Technical Working Committee 3. Respond to public comment Council/ request Draft Alternative ARC Environmental Document for IVISP 4. Retain experts to assist in efforts Council to prevent the designatior� of the third north parallel runway as the preferred MSP expansion alternative - When Completed Compieted Completed Not Applicable 5. Respond to public comment request Council! � Completed to Final Alternative Environmental ARC Document for MSP 6e Research what would stop the construction Staff/ARC of a third parallel runway � 7. Pursue MAC contract on the prohibition Staff/ARC Sept. 1996 of third parallel runway as per 1996 Council Dual Track legislation. 8e Research MAC Acquisition of Bureau of Staff Oct. 1996 Mines property and MAC interest in off airport properties in 3rd runway area i � ' ) AIR NOISE PLAN �F ACTION Issue: MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Goal: implement Noise Mitigation Needs in MSP Mitigation Committee's Recommendations Action Steps 1. Discuss Mitigation Needs Statement 2e Support Mayor's Efforts on MSP Noise Mitigation Committee 3. Consider Joint Efforts with NDCARC 4. Consider Assistance from Dakota County 5e Consider Lobbying and State Legislative Efforts � Who When ARC May, June, July ARC/Staff Summer 1996 Aug. 1996 Aug. 1996 Oct. 1996 � , AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION Issue: Conversion to Stage III Quieter Aircraft Goal: Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000 Action Steps: 1. Review NWA obligations to MAC regarding Stage II phaseout and research fleet mix at various airports around the country 2. Prepare letter to MAC regarding ongoing contract talks with NWA to request inclusion of language specifying phase out date 3. Work with MAC Commissioners who are supportive of effort to help build consensus amongst MAC, 4. Letter to NWA asking for their cooperation in committing to Year 2000 phaseout 5. Prepare media news releases and information letters explaining issue and asking for letters and/or calls to MAC in support of contractual language. 6. Work with MAC to assure 1996 legislation to convert to all Stage III aircraft by Year 2000 is implemented 7. Consider Backsliding of Stage III Conversion 8. Request MASAC Consideration of Backsliding . Who When Staff/ARC Completed Staff Completed Staff/ARC Completed Staff - Staff Completed Staff Continuous ARC Upon response of NWA ARC/Council same �. C � � � ■ � � � � Issue: Noise Reduction Through Litigation Goal: Determine Feasibility of a Legal Chailenge to Current Air Noise Distribution Action Steps: 1. Review history of legal challenges related to air noise 2e Investigate FAA procedures in effect at time of 1973 corridor decision - Freedom of Information Act request? 3e Continue to be kept abreast of other communities' issues and possible litigation process Who When Staff/ARC Completed Staff Completed Staff/ARC Continuous » Issue: Goal: AIR NOISE PLAN OF ACTION � �� � �� � � � c � �-�� o � �/�2 �� � S-� �n y �,.��,.. aS Assure In�tal�lati`o`fi of"�"o�'rnd�°Fn�sulation in �c-Mac�is Affected by Air Noise Exposure Air Noise Mitigation Through Sound Insulation � Action Steps: 1. Meet with school administrators to discuss need 2. Analyze MAC School Noise Monitoring Stu�iy 3. Continue to monitor changes in the Ldn contours and monitor the Part 150 Sound Insulation program completion process. i 4. Advocate expansion of Part 150 program through MSP Mitigation Committee. 5. C� � Who Staff When Completed Sfiaff/ARC Completed Staff/ARC On-going ARC/Council Fa111996 Advocate for the use of ANOMS data ARC/Council for Noise Contour Generation for qualifying Part 150 area L'�v �n_ S c �C �' �.ti-�- �� ;; � �, �. I t �-,. � a� G C G vr 5 c �� G � �� �- �.<f.-( � � ,�,A , ��,�v� G.,,�-e.��S SR �-r" � �� _'� Updated August 13, 1996 Fall 1996 r �� �.. 'i.��-y.r,w� � �-e, f'"(�-e, „��a5� �_ ����,� o�rr �1��', J � ,(� �V J� G I,� s� r_. c . � ,�'_ ��j ,� �� �.J � - � -�"' zre.^� �' r� (,� u �,,.�(�. �,. c. �-t�.r� G� t r- v�o [5^� . ��.-�-c.--'iZ - . b 12 C. C � � ' 1 i � � :1 . I� � August 13, 1996 To: Airport Relations Co�runission From: Kevin Batchelder, City Admini r_ Subject: Discuss Survey of Airport Communities on Ai.r Noise 0 Attached is a copy of the Survey of Community Preferences for Air Noise Mitigation efforts that has been distsibuted to the MSP Mitigation Committee. The Airports Relations Commission had requested copies of this item at its last meeting. AC�'ION REQUIl2ED `� Review and discuss the survey and forward any cornments to City Council. , , _ ) � � C� � • � �, • � •1 �; • • � • • , • • • •1 � � � � . • � • � � • � � � � N � . � . - . . , � . • • ' • • • . � � • . r • . , • • • ■ � � O -� � O C.i ..f,� . ......:�/' M � , a � . . , . w • • • � � � • • • • , . � • � . , . • • � • . ` . .� • . � • � r . ■ . � . •� • . . . • � . � . • , � . • .�r ' �r • .� � ■. � C^ �� � . . . r� • • � � • 1 � � i • • � • � � • � � • . � �; . - . ., � i � � 1 1 • • � • • � � • • •l � • . � � C� � r t 1 � � � � � 0 � O � .� � �O � `� � .� � � � 0 � 0 � � cii 0 0 ,� o � � �° � � o 'a� � � C. � � . � t � � • � � 1 _• � � � • • , • . � . � • • � • t � • � • � � � • � • � • • •� � � � � . . • � . • 1 � � � � � � � � � • • � 1 1 • , � • � � � � • • � • � r • � . . . � . . � • • � . � � � � � � • � � � � � • �r ' • � _� :.,,,�, � :� ; � / • • • � � w . � . � . •1 . . � � � . � �r � • • . w � 0 �sr � � � • � • � / � , � � � � / ! � � • • : • , • 1 � � � • / i � � • � �` � � � • � � / •� � • / • � � � � � � � 1 � � �� • � • • • � � • \ � • � • • � • � • 1 � / � • • � � � � � � � � � • � � � • • � � • w � � � �, - � • ; � • i • M . .., .'" ., .... . � - � • ; - �; • � • �' � \ e �n � � \ N • J . � • • s ' ;.` , �` ,.' � •: � 0 � ` Y � . � e . j � a �� .. �' �� :. �. 0 N • � �� .. `�'" � - N � N N m � 0 C c� . C � C� a c� C b N � • . � N C C O o�0 f�D d�' N � r s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad N L O � L Q a w r z � z � 0 r V O W ij t!1 _ - U � � � v z o ��Q N W N V Z � W '- 2 � a T V � N C� �. tp J ti Z � � � N O X W o � n � O Z �. � L � � � tf1 C tD C Q C� O 0�0 �,4p � N � r s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad a N rn r � T � T � T � � T �O � � T M T T � � T Q � r � (Li � O � T .�i%',' .. Q Q� •� � •� 0 � � � = Q ~ X N � � � N N � � �� � � d� M N T a � � � c�'v �' T- . s�uapuodsa� �o �ua�aad 0 � m � O 0�0 C�O V'�' N T s�uapuodsaa �o �uaoaad C�� � C � � �'r O � . � � � � , � 0 , � . , W . � . , , � � Z , , � . . . � Z , . _ U � L � � � � 3 VJ � ; �II O U - OC ; : ; ,, � yll �o° � J m V , � � � � Q � 1� L � � � � . � � L � . . _ +� : � � ��;i�i ��, � � � . , , . p , , , � � Q. � , . � III III I � a ~� , , �!� � � � � i O o�O t�U d�' N � ¢ r : s�uapuodsa}� �o �ua�aad N t� � � �� I _� �Om .•. 0 � 0 � O C�D C�O V'Q' N � r s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad � � C ` O o40 � d�" N • r s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad 'S Z Z � W Z Z � Z Z U � W U y. � � O m o Z z �d W _ C7 0 Z W � � � � O � � O o�0 t�o "¢d' : N O T s}uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad S' Z Z � W z z � -o a� = o U � r � � W L = O •� V � Z � � `. . 4 � J 0 Z Q aC�3 L� m � � 3 � � o � Z J � � W � ) ' � � �' � . � � . • . '. � � • .. • • . � -- i • .' � � - i • � � • � .' .' . .' � � . • O 00 � CD d' N O T s}uapuodsaa �o }ua�aad � a � c�o ►�r� � c� i N a o pa�i�oN �}�a�aiy �o aaqwnN a6�aany rn T � T � T- cc� T ui r � r M r N T r T � T � � � �O lA d' M N T M i" � C h `: j � � � � � - � _ • �= � i • • • � ' .` � • • • � �� � � � � . , � � C�7 M N N ��-. O t[) O pa�i�oN �sa�aiy �o aaqwnN a6�aany / Z Z � W Z Z , � Z _ U � W � S U � � � � J Y1 Z Q (d'3 W C � L � �. ► � • N •, .!• • , N •� •. • � n � Z � tU � L � � O ��x. W ' h t/1 �O Z � � i Q c� � � � cfl � ^�C 0 cfl O � 0�0 • � (�p I.�p d�' M N T s}uapuodsa� �o �ua�aad ' � � '� r u �TZZ: � � :7 � � J � �.. N L � G� 0 X W N t� :n O Z � ccs � i Q (i� � c�o � Q ��_�_F���_��_���_ O C� O o�0 (QO d� N � T ' s�uapuodsaa:�o �ua�aad � QM W , ,` � Z � v � • . � � O X W . n � � �O ` Z � • o. . « � L d tLf � G � � Q � 0� O � � 0�0 � � N � T pa�(ouuy �t�y6iH s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad a ,,, � M � c T O C Q � _ � N � , �� �� �11 0 � � � J Z � � � � � X O W W �O Z � � � tt) � Cp � C Q f� F"_T_� �� —�— �—�-.�—�- G�O O a�O C�O �V N � T pa�Couuy �t�y6iH �ua�aad 0 N V ' � � � z 0 � �� _ � 0 a x W � � �O Z � � i � � � � C C Q O o � ' � dQ' N tt� O T pa�(ouuy �(�yfisH s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad �, � C � ( j 8 . x N N o � co N - tti � 'a N � O C p C �h � � _ N O O � tQ0 � N � r _ a�a� }s�d pa�touuy �t�y6iH . � ., , 'S Z Z � � � �7, W � Z � Q � � O = m U � W N _ U � � � O o c J � m � Z ~ Q ('3 ¢ w � O � C�D � N � r s�uapuodsaa �.o �ua�aad � a C � l'J t'J �V �.V . T T suoi}�aadp �(fi�o �o aaqu.�nN � M M N N r rv- `�� suoi��aadp �(�ieQ �o aaqwnN ,� , � L C� G � � � 7 � � 7 O � Y � 5. � u D . � � C s � � � (� J � L t � , s � c� � .d W � c�d � U � m � � x O � Z 0 a� +: � O � � �� m w .� � � � � . '� ¢ 0 ba � � � o �, a� c� a�i � � Q. � a 4 � � � � S] Lt_ tD � C tIS � c+7 tl� N tf) r tf� O N r O s�}oa��l o� s6uipu�� �o oi��a � � � � �i'I� �� z � ? �� -------------------------- -� > w W ' -------------- � .._...-----._z ,,,� = a� U .n � c� _ . . _ . . _ c ---�---------------- o . � � S � U -�-• ------------�--------- p� o ---- a� � � � p� •� E -------------------------- 0° � Q .._ Z .� � Q .__._.__.----------------- W � . o Z W �, -.-------- � � -------.--.----. ... _ ��. o � � � Z � _� O o�0 t�0 d�' N O '� i T s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad � a 1 c ...... .........._. C C ` ,� �� ; ; • .. V. • - . � • � � .,; • • ' � _ .� • � .. • • � i � I ,. �, O o�0 tQ0 d�' N r s}uapuoclsaa �o �ua�aad rn T � T � � � 1'� . L. � � r � � � �- i= '� c r 0 :.: i�- ¢ . � � A 4 . � ) tA N � r � a O 0 h � O oQ0 � � N � T s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad rn T � T n r t0 T . - u�i *— � r c� � T ^ .� N � r c mG T T � T � � � � � � � �- M N r- � C � O G�0 t�0 dQ' N T s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad '� rn r 04 r ti T � " T � r d' � r O M � � � � � O � r � D � � � � � a i' n � � V O N N � � � o�D t�0 'd N T s�uapuodsaa �o }ua�aad � T � T � T � T i � � O r -� CO �t .� r c+� T N r r r i � O �. N rn � ti � L � 0 � � r d' M ' CV � O � C� i � O o�0 � d�' N T s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad � r � T � T � . T � f � O r � M Y r- =r � N � r � � r- � � � 70 N � � D n � � v O � � •- � � � � •� a' � -' � � • .. � � � _ . • , • � � •> • • O a�o c�O � N � T s}uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad rn T � T � T � � � T ^, �V Ne � T O � � r M r � N � r- � �r- r- � v� O � a N r- � L Qi � � � � � o O T � � � � V � � 9 � � ` ,� .; i O o�0 C�O v�' ' N � r s}uapuodsa� �o �ua�aad � � T � T � T � r LLi r � � Cf' � r � � �"� r � � N Q r f � D � � �0 fn tU ` � ;o A � ?q V � � � O p�p � �Q.. N C� s}uapuodsaa �o }ua�aad � � � ` �j L�r L G Lr i �Y i L n _ > r � � � � 9 �rt ! � J 3 � . 1 I � � i 0 � tl � � w N � a O � � `� „ a � � O n O 8 'e m . $ n ' � s)uepuodsey ao ►u�r�ed ^ sluepuodsea �o Iueoied . e s s h A 6 0' M b 0 3 'o a � m 6 � s r ,`� � O O n w 7 O 8 .�i o i 'a � o � s�uepuodsab jo we��ed . , . e e O O O w w r� O O O w e o ,8 S p i O � O Zr �1 p � b a 'o � 'o � 5 b .rS ♦ m ♦ � �e "� O O O w n w p O O 8 e� u' i a � 8 a m $ � 8 $ n' S $� o quepuodsey }o lu�aed stuepuo�ed �0 3ue��ed s�uepuodsea }o �uea�ed O O O A A f� 0 S � 0 � � 0 i'. qb C a e � O � O � O N y� � w � O S O w w S O O 8 'o u +' n � 8 : 'm � $ ' 8 e 'm $ $ � s�uepuodsea jo �ue��ed S)uepuodsea }0 lueaad sluepuodsea �o �uea�ed � � m ri p p�p � VQ.. N O s�uapuodsa� �o �ua�aad rn T � T � T � r LQ r- d' � :� � � y � � � r- c� � � tn C � . D � h ) J � � Y \ , t � Q � c�D � N � r s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad $ ` O o�p � � N O T s�uapuodsaa �o �ua�aad � � � � 1 1♦: . :, ,. August 13, 1996 To: Airport Relations Commission � From: Kevin Batchelder, City Ad `�� r- Subject: Discuss Resident's Petition on Part 150 Sound Insulation DISCUSSION Attachecl is a copy of a petition from 24 households in the Rogers Lake Neighborhood inqniring why their homes are not eligible for the Part 150 Sound Insula.tion program. Also enclosed is my letter of response to acknowledge th� receipt of their petition. �'his petition is being forwarded to ihe Airport Relations Commission and to the City Council for consideration. As the Commission is aware, the City is currently advoca.ting the expansion of the area. of eligibility for both the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program and the azea for noise mitigation - procedures being considered by the 11�ISP Mitigation Committee. The MSP Mitigation '_.� Committee is hosting a public meeting at the Thunderbird Hotel, at 2201 Past 78th Street 3n Bloomi.ngton, on August 29, 1996 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. The Commission should discuss the petition and forward any comments to City Council. . m �-ec-'�- F'S �Ca = `�G� August 5, 1996 Mayor Charle� Mertensotta and City Council 1101 Victoria �urve Mendota Heights, Mn 55118 Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council: 1--_.._ This letter is written to protest the airplan.e noise in our neighborhood- Cheri Lane. We ha�e friends and relatives living on Swan Drive and Bluebill who have told us they gpt a letter gining thear $25,000 for repairs and replacements.on their homesa We here on Cheri Lane have received no proposal or settlement like this at a111 Why? And, we've heard St. Thomas Academy and Visitation Schools are getting 2y� Million dollars! The students are there only 6 to 8 hours a day, 9 months a year. The teachers are there probably only 8 hours a dayetc. Meanwhile, we on Cheri Lane are in our homes 24 Hours a day, ? d�rs a week, 12 months a year. And we get nothin�. Why? If you at City Hall really believe there is no noise problem on Cheri Lane . we invite you to come over here•and see and hear for yourself. Do we have to take legal action to get a fair treatment like our neighbors? When wip( we hear from you on thi�? ^� ,�/ c,L•�lc�.r�r•i t'.1 / -lGt.!`]�'1f�' S in e e2y . ,l �l � i G' t �1C r� ..�.r,t�- �. J � �`� K-� �i�i..�.�rr,,,�.-.� ��.`"� , ���'�Ji.;% To� Pa7.me � /���f.=�z�... /.�: �.�'1�'atc�:�% �' Ra��F; Weidner � � J �. Q� r�o,�nPC�' /� ,� 888 �heri Zane� . ..���.� ✓2�Cw-- Gerry el'son � l $95 �heri La�ae D' 8 C ri L���� lJG`yV Q�'�'-c� � Orit Roua,che 880 �heri L e ----_... t�� ��" ar�ozm �z Yrixrr�tC�� zi�+lc 874 Cheri Lane � ��� � J cqu'line Pet rson 871 Cheri I,ane �%.'�'Z-- ����-----_.__.. Tom Schwartz ,,,r� 86'7 Cheri Lane � -s Ron Kelle � � �;���„u" ( 866 Cheri ane � n� hrait$ $55 Cheri Lane ��� Lou Hurv�.tz 858 Cheri Lan $�� Jim page 843 Cher3. I�ane �`�'"� Ter Zl-r� 838 Che ' yane. �ti1�G����� Todd Carlson 83? C eri. L , _/T�� - Rick Erickson $ 2 Che ' Lane v oh 825 C ri` ane ,�.�:�� � Steve Hanson 826 Cheri L�ne �-��.���.���,.-�.. zm ilburg 819 �h�� Z�e � au]. aszko 9�?/�heri,�an.e � C !-Z/�"' � t'a??L��`.!`..�/c..i_;�`.;rZc'„ti ��� c �.�`i�- o� : }/J�� �.s��a�.,i,r.�.�r�--' � . �� �. ,� ��� ������ � L��� �� y �� � ; .� !���" ' � �. Robe�t F. Weidner 888 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Orit Rouache $80 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 To�m Schwartz 867 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Lou Hurvitz 858 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Tim Page 843 Chen Lane Mendota. Heights, MN 55120 Rick Ericksoa 832 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 7im Kilburg 819 Cheri Laae Mendota. Heights, MN 55120 Dianne Martin 901 Cheri Lane Mendota, Heights, MN SS120 f )� Gerry Nelson 895 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Larry Kazmierczak 874 Cheri Lane Mendota. Heights, MN 55120 Ron Keller 866 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Tom Palmer Mary Kay Palmer 850 Gheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Terry Zien 838 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 John Lapakko 825 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, A4N 55120 Paut Maczko 907 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Monica Olsen 887 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 � Dave Pace 879 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Jacqueline Peterson 871 Cheri Lane Mendota. Heights, MN 55120 Annette Schmitz 855 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Gary Dueffsert 844 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Todd Carlson 837 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Steve Hanson Sue Hanson 826 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Pat Randall 902 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Rose M. Schmidt Geratd F. Schmidt 849 Cheri Lane Mendota Heights, MN 55120 w • August 9, 1996 Dear Resident: The City acknowledges your petition regarding the Sound Insulation program operated by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) that you have noticed near your neighborhood. Formally known as the MAC Part 150 Residential Sound Insulation Program, this is a federal program implemented through MAC by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to make neighborhoods located near airports more compatible with airport noise. We appreciate your interest in this progra.w and this letter is an attempt to describe the Part 150 program for you. The Part 150 Progr�un is a program where FAA. funds are given to local airport operators (MAC) to provide sound insulation to residential and educational structures o� to acquire property within eligible areas around a�rports. The area. of eligibility for this program has been defined by the FAA as the approved 1996 DNL 65 noise contour. (Please see attached map.) The 1996 DNL noise contour represents a five-year projection of the yearly noise average at the Mi.nneapolis-St. Pau1 International Airport (1VISP). Tlus contour has been overlaid on a � land use map around Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport to define the area of eligibility. Residences and schools inside or adjacent to this I.DN 65 contour are eligible for Federal assistance. The Metropolitan Airports Com�mission implements this program thraugh'funding provided by the FAA and MAC in the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program. The City of Mendota Heights has no control over the FAA Part 150 program with the exception of whether we desire to participate in this program or not. • Since 1991, the City of Mendota. Iieights has agreed to participate in this program and for the last several years 54 homes in the Furlong Addition, along Pi1ot Knob Road, Rogers Road (now known as Boume Lane) and along Lexington Avenue have had the opportunity to voluntarily participate. Schools, whether they are public or private, are second in priority to residential structures for sound insula.tion. Visitation and St. Thomas Academy are inside the area. of eligibility, and recently have attained the priority level necessary to participate in the program. Recently the FAA has approved the extension of the Part 150 program to include "boundary blocks". Bounclary blocks are defined as blocks that aze intersected by the outermost 65 DNL contour boundary of the approved 1996 Noise Fxposure Map. Based on the "boundary block" _ decision, an additiona135 homes in the Curley Neighborhood, along Lexington Avenue, Wagon Wheel, Swan Drive and Rogers Avenue have become eligible for 1996 funding. August 9, 1996 Page two The City of Mendota Heights is strongly advoca.ting the expansion of the area of eligibility for the FAA Part 150 prograin. Mayor Mertensotto is cunently working extremely hard through the MSP Mitigation Committee to see that the sound insulation programs aze expanded to include other Mendota Heights neighborhoods including Wagon Wheel Trail, Rogers Lake neighborhood, Eide Addition, Mendakota. Estates, Curley neighborhood and Friendly Hills. Mendota. Heights has long advocated the expansion of the Part 150 Program to the DNL 60 contour which would include all the above mentioned neighborhoods. It makes no sense to draw a curtain on a map in which homes on one side are 100 percent eligible and homes on the other side are not eligible. We are hoping that through our current efforts, we can achieve an expanded area of eligibility. However, these decisions are exclusively under the control of the MAC and the FAA. Your petition will be forwarded to Mr. Steve Vecchi, Progra.m Director at the Metropolitan Airports Commission for the Part 150 Noise Program. Your petition will be forwazded to the Airport Relations Commission and to the City Council. I have attached some background information on the Part 150 program for your information. Plea.se do not hesitate to contact me if you have further questions, or would like to discuss this issue. Sincerely, I�evin Batchelder City Administrator cc: City Council Steve Vecchi, MAC , � :- . " ' �_� ,�� ���u I�.�J�11 /i W��F( t M '1•� a�r � .1.Yb�ytYt. ::,ar�:��.>''n•3ltFt1�K. � s���a ��� :� iiU$iti 'G:ltii.!yrt��+�11�'� '���fl /i. ■�� �U��rF��If Y<■ i.:et�: ai:]•ua f'1a�. it�,r ���:i 'K'�' �f:�� iL�� � i ii � :.� � r: i ::� � : ��� oDo�f����o�� ��;::��,� :::t;;�i��,.t::K.;. :.•.;+�..: �,r+z.:t .f,�Xitltt;. The Sonnd Insuia�ion Progra�n is clesigaed to t�duce ir�rior sound te�els bp a minimum of 5 deabels. T� P�� 8� is to reduce the averdge internal nouse leve] in babit�bie rooms dimctiy exposed to aircraft noise. 1i�is levcl has l� established by EAA geddelines. _ Qnoe a home has been desigaatea for sound insWaHon, its degree of insvlahen modificauons w�i11. depeud ugon c�nior ai,raxft sound le��eLs, exisling condition of the home and loc�tio�e within DAZ (c�iy-�uF;ht leven zanes. R�e°� �si�8 w�in t�e certified Igg6 DIdL 65 aoise contoar bonndarywiii! rece,rye a 5 de�cibet Reduction Pa,ekage including the following modifications: ° TCCOIldit�OtriAg Of eXLSting wll7do�t5 • wall and attic insiila�ion • ad�on af acousstiRt�t exterioz storm vvindows • storm door replacemeni • baffiing of attic and roof vents • central air condition3ng (if not ez�sting) i; �� i ,:. ;� t �. ` � :, , �� :+ . � r � ; ` Accor�ing w 6AA guidelin,�, areas within the MSP 1996 D!Vi 65 (daR�g6�t level) Noise Contour are eli�ibl� f or the Part ISO Sound insvla�ion Piograrn. Based an recammenda�Ions frvm the FAA, the MAC has determined tkat blacks should be priocitized for soand insulation.in each crty frased an aircraft noise e�posure level,e. Homes ia the highest DI� ranges wifi�in � cityw�l he insvtar�d &rst . Sance ja�ivary 1995, the NL9C has prioritized all eligibie blvcks w3thin tfie cities of.h�inneapolis, `� Richfield, 8loomingt�m. Eagan and Mendota Hei the Ai rt Noise aad ��g botfi the cemfied 19g6 DNt, Noise Contour and � Oner�ations Manitoring S�stem (AtJOMS) aai��l and departure flight trdck data. ' First, us�g the sirtgle inexement DNi 2ones from the certifled 1996 D1VL Noise Conwur (containing DNt 75, 74, 73, 72, 7I, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66 and 65 zoues), eIigible blocEcs in all ci�ies aze assigned a DNL wne. Once tlus Proc�s is cbmpleted, blocks x�hin the same DhZ zone are further priori�zed using ANOMS acwal air canler arrival and deparpu�e gigl�t tracl: data, 1Tus hva-step prooess results iu a ary-speciSic ma.ster Iis� of blocks prioriiized based on actual noise �Pos�tt'e, from which the �fSP Part i50 Sound Ins�la6on Program will6e im�lemented As each block becomes etigible for insutadon modifications, homeowners will be noaified to be�in t�e o�on and cons[ruction process�s, , ` 0 _.��` � � � v�'"'� � o �o _.._s��.. . _..._c�.1isJT7��� _�',S# cet �� .....��� �� --,t�,�,,,�- . _ � , , ^_ . . ... . ... � __' ` ��'�'1:,-95 l�i�� � �E ?�` c: � i ''2� �^�6 � �. �, w fi � p ;' � .' -- .._...... ,�.�.� w.� w�ni. �1 ' �� �• .: ' ::�� + ... . ( ��.�� '� t '��. .) �. ! � �) � OlG r�o ��ye r.ea�11 � The Federal Aviation Achnuiistration (FAA) Regula6�n "part 1�0" �irport xoise �r,d L�nd U,e �mP��9 P��B Program wnsists of sev�era! diff,�ent land use op�ons designed to mal� neishborhoods lacated near aiiporrs more com�ble r�h ai�On noise. - Zhe FAA dete�mines cli�ibilityfor Pazt 150 Programs b�' usin� aa aPP� "�-Y�" DIZL bi (d�ry-crigiu leve�} noise concour. Tt�s noise ooncour r�ts a 6ve-year Projactian of the yearly naise avecage at the 11�nneapolis-St Paal Int�rnatioaal Aiipo�i (MSP) in 1996 (see 1996 �LSP DNL 65 noise ���' �1�on on �e 8). 't'hi� i qgG UM. 65 noise contaar w�l be updated �on FAA, caq�pY i£ tutucc physicat or op�tional changes arise at MSP, Patt 170 funding f�r cli�ible; residcnts is b�ang �c+uvici�xl on a y�ear� basas by both the FAA, and t�e M�Po� �upons Contmi.ssioa (MAC). Tn Apn11991, thc MAC fo�ual tbe Pact 150 Policq Advisorp Coauni�ee {PAC) consis4ing of rePresenta�ves hom B�[oomingwn, h�naeapalis, Rich&e1d, Ea�an, Mendoi�a. Heights, St. Paut, Metropolitan �:� Cnuna�, M�politan rurcraft Sound Abatemr�t Counal and F�t# to as�asc MAC in the cic,�vc�lopmc�nt and design of the Part li0 Pro�xms t�at woald be innptemeated. in the communities closety surro�.mding MSP in Fe6ruacy 1992, �he PAC recommended w MAC the foilowing two Pzfma�y Pa�t 150 programs for "smplememation atMSi': • Sou�nd lnstilalion rirograrn • LandAcquisidon Program 1?ac� aty is nesponsible for seIection of the abovePart 1�0 programs for eligible are�.c, dependinfi on theu' spe�&c cIry Iand use pIans. The Sound �.sulazion Program w�ll most L'kely 6e the largest of the MSP Part 1,i0 pro�azns to be impl�ted by th e MAC m the aaes ol' Minneapolis, �ilaomington, Richfield, F.agan and Mendota Haghts. While MAC w�[ have overall responsib�' �' imPl��in� �e Sounc�Znsulation Program, each Par�aPa�n$ c�'will be responsible for asLsting MAC with home�wn� idauiGca�ion anithin prioritued b�odcs. AIthough homcownes partiapation in t�e souad iasalation pragcam is voliinta�; it is encouraged. � ���� ° ' -�"'`�� !�,, ��,���._m.+� 5� _� c��.__� � � �� _ � �---,—�i��'.� ..�..� iP�\� � . ��C-1�-95 �l�� �:�5 P�� � � ... ._ _..... . ...... .. _ .. . . . . c.?� 7?3 ��q� .. . _......�. 4 � . '� ) : � �. 1 I� 1 � 1�, ►- r Based on the approved 1996 DNL 65 noise contou� appm�imately 7,1g l homes are currendy eligible -for the MAC Part 150 Residential Sound Insula�ion Program at an eslim�t;ed cost of $127,700,000. (An - addiaonal 1,676 homes in the soudi Richfield and Bloomington areas are currendy deferred due to the Runway 4/22 Runway Use S�stem ongoing mediation.) � . During the 1992-1995 time period, MAC insvlated a total of 1,823 homes in the MAC Part 150 Residentiaal Sound Insulation Program at a wst of $35,200,000. The 1992 grant year (139 homes) seived as the "pilot" year in which MAC tested various acousi'rcal produds and techniques, as well as construcction proces.ses. Since 1992, MAC has made many modific�tions to improve the pmgi�m and has gradually acceleraieci the rate of homes insulated each y�eac ,, It is pmjected that MAC will ia�laxe 1,200 homes in 1996 at a cost of $20,700,000 and maintain tivis insiilarion schedule until campl�iion in the year 2000, �ntingent on available funding. The following is a s�immuy of the program status. Grant Year 1992-93 year 1993=94 year 1994-95 year 1995-9G year 199G-97 year 1997-98 Yea�' 1998-99 year 1999-4o year 2Q00-01 year � Homes Insulated 139 homes 244 homes 600 homes � 840 homes 1,Z00 homes 1,200 homes 1,200 homes 1,200 homes 568 homes Anrival Cost $ 4,400,000 $ 5,900,000 $10,400,000 $14,540,000 $20,700,000 $20,700,000 $20,700,000 $20,700,000 $ 9,700,000 PROGRAM FUNDING Status completed completed completed completed in process projected projected P�1� projected The MAC Part 150 Residential Sound Insulation Program is funded entirelX from "airport generated" funding sources, including MSP P�assenger Faality Charges (PFC) and FAA. Airport Improvement Program ,. (AII') funds. No local, state or federal taxes are used. for the program. �`���.�1���i�._���� �- _ �. �s� �__._�...°��f't_�'.� .� � a . � � � C � 8A So. St. PauUinver Grove Heights, West St PauUMendota�Heights Sun�Current/Wednesday, Aug.14, 1996 ♦ � � � � • � ., • � • . � '. � ' 1 . i By Mike Westholder Staff Writer A panel working on a recommenda- tion for mitigating the impact of the Min- neapolis St. Paul International Airport reached one agreement Friday. The Airport Mitigation Committee won't be able to make its recominenda- tion in time to meet the Legislature-im- . • posed September deadline. . Committee chairperson Steve Cramer said the panel will need more time. Cramer concluded that the committee should push back to October the dead- line for its report to Metropolitan Air- ports Commission. "That waq we can work our way through this and get a good set of rec- ommendations," Cramer said. Besides, most elected officials will be more focused on campaigning than� on the panel's recommendations, he said. __ Last session, the Legislature directed r' ��C to produce a report on how best to �_.:rect noise mitigation efforts to reduce the impact of airport noise on area resi- dents. In turn, 1VIAC appointed the mitiga- tion, committee. The committee is com- prised of representatives from MAC, Northwest.Airlines, the Metropolitan Council and the mayors of the cities most impacted by airplane noise. Members of the mitigation committee scheduled a public hearing for residents to eomment on the noise mitigation op- tions the panel is discussing. The public hearing will be ? p.m. Aug. 29 at the �hhunderbird Hotel, 2201 E. 78th St. in Bloomington. . � During their fourth meeting to date; committee �members coritinued to dis- cuss their positions on several mitiga- tion issues. 7.bpics included expanding the. boundaries for noise insulation and construction of a north-south runway for noise redistribution. � � The crosswind Runway 422 is being extended by 2,600 feet and could be used for noise redistribution after its. com- pleted next month. � � MAC Had planned to use 4-22 for noise redistribution but was prevented when the City of Richfield filed litiga- tion. That suit charged that MAC's envi- ronmental impact study of the runway and its impacts was not adequate. Through mediation, Richfield agreed to stay the suit when MAC agreed to build the extension without the taxi ways needed to use 4-22 for noise redis- tribution. Committee members briefly dis- cussed the use of the egtended Runway 422 for noise redistribution, sending more planes toward south Richfield and north Bloomington and away from south: Minneapolis and north Richfield. Several stake-holders including rep- resentatives from Minneapolis, Eagan and MAC suppori the plan, while Bloom- ington and Richfield oppose it. 1b use the extended runway for noise spread.ing, the take-off points must be moved about a half-mile closer to resi- dents in Bloomington and Richfield. MAC estimates the cost of insulating and acquiring noise-impacted homes in south R,ichfield and Bloomington at $4a million. � � � Committee members discussed thE timeline for constructing a north-soutb runwaq along the west side of the airpori property. ' If a north-south runway is built, thc 422 runway could not be used for noise spreading, malang it only usable for long haul and international flights. If the north-south is built in three years, it may not be necessary to insu- late noise-impacted homes in Blooming- ton and south Richfield while Runway 4 22 is used to redistribute noise, Metro- politan Airports Commissioner John Himle said. ' But if the north-south runway takes 15 to 20 years to build, insulation likely would be required in those areas most af- fected by 4-22. . Both Eagan and Richfield have voiced opposition to tlie north-south runway. Himle asked the mayors of Eagan and Richfield whether their communities would attempt to delaq the construction of a north-�outh runway through litiga- tion. Eagan Mayor Thomas Egan said his community is serious in its opposition and had not ruled out the option of liti- gation. • Richfield Mayor Martin Kirsch said his community would reserve the right to litigate depending on the outcome of the environmental. impact statement being prepared. "We will alwaqs keep the option of 1i�t- igation to protect our residents," Kirsch said. . Richfield of�cials are particularly concerned with ground-level noise that will be generated on the north-south runway, he said. If the panel votes to recommend the north-south runway be built, Richfield should determine what mitigation ef- forts it needs to "soften the impact," Himle said. A position statement on that topic is being prepared and will be completed�in about a month, Kirsch said. � » C� •0?i25i96 13:29 EXECTIUE � 612 452 fl940 � o•• �,• .. > . 1�LT1��P4I.�`�`..�.i1T �!�.�Qi�.'� 9 CiQ S5►it��T . -•°;`'3 ��•1� Min�eapol�s-Saint Paul Inte�tic�nal 1�.i.r�ort , T r'� 6040 • 28th. �c�enue Sauth • Mi.nnedp�olfi�� ?Vl1V 5545D-2999 ' Phnne (61Z) 726-81oQ • FaX (�i�� i26-5296 � � J. i; � �. 't � .j• • y a.p�uat�v July 23, 199fi Mayot Sharcn Sayies Beiton Cityr af Minneapotis City Hall — Roam 331 350 South Fifth Street Minneapolis, Minr�esota 55415-9398 Dear Mayar Sayles Beiton and Mayar iUte�tensotia: Mayar s AI[erter�so�fo City Q# tdata �gl�fs �1Q1 �'' 'a Gucve Mer�d p��eighfs, t�innEsota 551 i 8 As yeu know. tf�e Minnesata Legistature in 'i996 adepted ter �6�4, dir+�c�ng the � (Ute�opolitan Ai�ports Commission to proceed with impJe �is�n of ii�e Year 20'!Q Long Tenn Comprehensive Pian. As a part af �hat legisiation, 1 is direczed ta eMer into a cantract with each "affected cily" providing that MAC may � cansiruc� a ifiird pa.ca!!e! rt,�m+uay at Minnea�otis•St Paui t�temationat Airport withau# the a � cify`s approvai. It is otar determination that the cities af Minrieapolis and Mendota ts are "a�Fected ci�ies" a� used in the Legislaf�on (attachedj_ Pursuant to the legi�lation, the car��racts are ta � entere�i � by Ja��a�,r t, 3897. In otr�er ta meet this iegislaave requirement, I woufd ask that each ��eu. on bef�atf af your +�, designate an �ndividuat or ieam� to nego�a�e an agr�emen� ��mpt� witi� �e legistation. I have asked MAC General CaunseE To�n Anderson to lea�d ��o fhe %am represe�ting MlAC 2nd wQuld ask that yau eortfaci him direcily as soorr as at� � vi�iva# ot team has i�een selected. Than� yau fQ� yaur consideration and cooperaiion. V rq truiy yQu , �. � .l'1�2��. Jeffr W. Hami�l Executive Uirectcr cc: �,EI Commissione�s Thornas W. Anderson The �fa�ropoi�tan A::��artc c:,..r.tr.=.>-i�..� .s sa rcir.�12t14•p o�co� er.:�:n..r. 07i25i96 13:29 EXECTIUE � 612 452 0940 N0.044 D�3 0 ��ec. 10. •Niinnesota Statuies 199�. seetaor� 4'73.508, is �d� bY ��g a subdivissan tn read: , . . �ubd. 29. CONST`RUGi10N OF � 1'� •����AY. ta! The cvrtm�- tion must enter intti a conLraet with each affeciecl � t� vides i33e co ratioa ma� �ot constYuct a third arallel runwav at the B+Sinn lis-S� iat�a�rnai ' r� �Piihoui #he affected citv's a rov�l. The co ra�ion rnust eat�r i�s oonia�acts b�aa 1. i99 �. (b) If a contra,et with a cit�,r as zeauired bY fhis sa���n is not ea+�ct�.tec� ksy Jar�arv l. - "-- -----...� ..z_ .� s..+,.,., .it 11T�.4i ::��Y�I�I�1_� io'�_x� _ ►i.' r�"�� i '.�.�.'c� . m C � • /`'"'► V � � � METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL General Meetinq July 23, 1996 7:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. 6040 2$th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota � � 1. Call to Order, Roli Cail 2. Approval of Minutes af Meeting June 25, 1996 i I 3. Introduction of Invited Guests ' '! ; Receipt of Communications , i 4. Technical Advisor's Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary 5. Geographic Informatio� Systems P�esentation - Dan Pfeffer, ANSP - i �i 6. Report of the MAC Commission Meeting i 7. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 8. Other Items Not on the Agenda 9. Adjournment Next Meeting: . August 27, 1996 _.: . Nofe,� Oniy designated MASAG ;. tepre5eniat�ves seate;� ai tfie table .wiii be .;; allowed ta vofe - MINUTES METROPO�ITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING June 25, 1996 7:30 p.m. � 6040 28th Avenue Soath Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. �all to Order. Roll Cail ' The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at ?:30 p.m. and the secretary was asked to call the �oli. The foliowing members were in attendance. Mark Saimen � Northwest Brian Bates Airbome Express Bob Johnson MBAA Dick Keinz MAC _ Jim Serrin Minneapolis John Richter Minneapolis - Joe Lee Minneapolis Scott Bunin � St. Paul Tom Hueg St. Paui Don Priebe Richfield Jamie Verbrugge Richfield - John Nelson Bloomington Petrona Lee Bloomington � �� Jon Hohenstein Eagan • Mike Schlax • Eagan , Lance Staricha Eagan Jill Smith Mendota Heights � Ed Porter Bumsville James Hollenbeck Bumsville Dale Hammons Inver Grove Heights Glenda Spiotta SunfishLake Advisors �. (Associate Public Member) Ron Crabill F� Cindy Greene F� John Foggia Technical Advisor Visitors � Borys Polec � Minneapolis � � 5. Update: Pa�t 150 Sound Insulation Proqram Steve Vecchi recapped current statistics and information on the Part 150 Sound Insulation � ' . Program. Mr. Vecchi dispiayed and expiained a new digitized contour map, produced by MACs Aviation Noise and Satellite Program, which was color coded with the block-by-block prioritization. Steve explained the Decibel Reduction Package and the home modifications involved. Please see the attached Monthly Status Report: • By the end of 1995, 1823 homes were insulated fo� $35.2 million. • This year the pace was accelerated to 1200 homes per year or 100 homes pef month. This is the highest rate of any airport in the US. • The budget is $20.7M for 1996. � • The total budget for the project is $156.7M (Average -$17,300 per home) • Total homes completed as of 6-1-96 is 1912. There are 399 homes in constrvction and 337 in preconstruction. A total of 2648 homes are in the system. Various questions were answered regarding the p�ogram. 1995 Proaram Improvements (1) MAC increased their direct invoivement in the program (2) specialized the consultant staff, (3) chair all key program meetings: homeowner meetings, general contractor meetings, supplier meetings, asbestos abatement � mechanical meetings; etc., • (4) improved product styles, all of which must be tested and approved. Last year MAC received a federal award for the highest Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) participation in a federal prog�am. Homeowner Survev Results Mr. Vecchi presented the 1992-1995 Homeowner Survey results. Please refer to the attachment. Significant improvements in all categories have been made to the program over the past four years. • Jim Semn commented on unhappy homeowners. He asked if MAC has investigated whether or not homeowners are selling their home immediately or soon after the sound insulation modifications are completed. 6. Presentatian: NADP Recommendation Mark Salmen Northwest moved, and Dick Keinz MAC seconded to recommend to the MAC . P&E Committee and t�he Full Commission the "Distant Communitv Depa�ture Profile" utilization on Runwavs 11UR and Runwav 4/22 and the "Close-in Community Deqarture Profile" utilization on Runwavs 29UR. A discussion session followed. Page 3 9. Other Items Not on the Aqenda Chairman Johnson announced that this will be Jean Deighton's last meeting serving MASAC as the recording secretary. She is leaving MAC to enter the private sector. � Jim Serrin elaborated on the. importance of �edistributing straight-out departure traffic over heavily used arrival paths. There are several areas that are closer to the airpo�t than others which get very little tra�c, and redistribution would help. The matter of fanning some of the departure tracks needs to be seriously considered for relief in the 60 to 65 DNL area. Elirrri�ation of sharp tums, redistribution of flights over Minneapalis, and aircraft routing needs to be -addressed. He suggested MASAC begin a study on this redistribution of traffic. Other members commented that reasonable distribution of noise is one of MASAC's main tenets, and this redistribution needs to be addressed. 10. Adioumment Chairman Johnson adjoumed the meeting at 10:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted. Jean Deighton, Secretary Page 5 �� � � � � a� � H � � v� �O � � � v � C1 � a o � � � '� � o � � � � � o � . '� a� W o � � i a •� � � o � �! � °�U � ..�, � � i�� ���,'ao A � '� � � � � � � •� � � � � y � � � • � � Q N � o � Q� � �i% c� � ' � � p. � p.� �" a � p' � __ �C a' � ° � .� � � �. � �U N� ���� Z �� . � U a� 'ai .� � � � Q � . AH '��� � � � � � O � � '�' � ai nl "'" � o� Q �� v��1 ° �a � o � � o` � � V� +•�+ � � ��O �°��° � � . � � � N G1 l� C^ M M .-i d�°' � N 00 e1° � N I N �� � M � O V'� pp 00 tn p� ' � cn •—� I � � Er V.2 O � � � �� 0 � 0 A z v H v° � � � � � w w � � O x x M � � ����� ����,� ��,a;o ��:��� ����� WW�WW ����� 00000 xxxxx ��000 mN�o�oN N t+t c!' v'� �D Q� O� O� O� O� Q�TO�O�O� � 00 � v 0 0 0 0 o M �� � � � U E"' o' O • U � a o• O C.> F _ ,. :.,, ---�-------'����������..�..iiiiiii{i{iiiiii�!/JI/////////////////i y�. t ---���r � Minneapolis / St Paul InternationaZ Airpori � .-..�, ..,:.....,... � °� MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Airpart Sound'Abatement Council cra;�„��: Robut P.7ohneou Vice Chairman: saou a,�w TechrsicdAdv'uan John Toggia Sec�etary: Ima Deg6tm Airborne Erprc.rs: s� aoia AirTmnrparl A.uocialiorc reW ht�c�.. ALPA: Chaeiea W. Curry jr. Ciy ofBlaomingfon: Pdrom Lee Vern Witmx . City ojBtvmville: r� cu��. c;ty ��,gan Tom L�gm • �ry cflmerGrove Heightr: Delc Hnmmane Gty cfMendataNeighu; I� 3miW City q jMinnenpolir: ]�ca B. Scrrin 7ahn Rldttcr� J« Lee .Todi16 Dodge City afRichfuld: Gcoe�eKarnns ' Don Pciebe c;ty �sr. to� ra,x: ttot� at�.H Ciy af St. Paul: sma a� c� c. wti� c�� a� M�c�a� D�rm.urt;,k.r,�c.: tud� x�a..di Fed�re�,r.,.*: Tom xt,anedc Fedeml Aviation Admtnirhntiarc Btuoe Wi�gmer � Romld Glaub MAC SlaD:• DidcICeinz MBf1A: RobM P.Iohneon Mvaln Northwut Airlirtk: Lawreaa McCabe Mehopa/itan Airportr Commisrion: Commisiaaa Atton Gasper MNAirNatianat Guord: Majoe hlaeic R N�m Norlhwert Airlinu: �� s�� J�rasoyro Sl. Pau1 CfnmberofCarune�ce: Jadc Barkky Sun Cauntry Airlinu: I.alce A. Gomez � Utited Airlinet J%: Allnn Tomitosoo United PamlService: 3twe WaL►ce� - Pegg� H�Iman US.AirFo�ceRuerve: CapWin 9levm Chopmco us.s�Pr�,�»rer�m�: �� a� Metropolitan Airports Commission Declaration of Purposes 1.) Promote public welfare and national securiry; serve public interest, convenience; and necessity; promote air navigation and Iransportation, international. national, state, and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, safe, and economical handlinp of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in national and international pro�ams of air transportation; and to those ends to develop the fUll potentialities of the metropolitan area in this state as an aviation center, and to conrelate that area with all aviation facilities in the entire state so as to provide for the most economical and effective use of aeronautic facilities and services in that area; 2•) tlssure the residents of the metropolitan area of the minimum environmental impact from air navigation and, transportation, and to that end prrnide for noise abatement, control of airport area land use, and other protective measures; and 3.) Promote the overall goals of the state's environmental policies and m;n,r,,;�e the public's exposure to noise and safety hazards around airports. Mefropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council Statement of Purpose This corporation was fonmed in. furtherance of the general welfare of the communities adjoining I�nneapolis-St Paul International A.irport - Wold-Chamberlain Field, a public airport in the Counry of Hennepin, State of M'innesota, through the alleviation of the problems created by the �saund of aizcraft using the airPort; through study and evaluation oaa a continuing,basis o�f the problem and of suggestion for the a�leviation of th� same. through initiat'ron, coordinadon and promofion of reasonable and effective procedures, control and regulations, consistent with the safe operadon of the airport and af airc�'aft using the same; and through dissemination of information to the affected cammunides, their affected residents, and the users of the airport respecting th� problem af aimsaft noise m�isance and iri respect to suggestions made and actions iniiiated and taken to alleviate the problem. Metropolitan Aircraft 5ound Abatement Council . Representation The membership shall include representatives appointed by agencies, corporations, associations and governmental bodies which by reason o� their statutory authoriry and rPsgonsibility or control over the airport, or by reason of their status as airport users, have a direct interest in the operatian of the airport. Such members will be called User Representatives and Public Representatives, pravided that the User Itepresentatives and Public Representakives shall at all times be equal in number. The Airport 2A�-hour Noise Hotline is 726-9411. Comglaints to the hotline do not result in changes in Airport activity, but provides a public sounding board and aicport information outlek The hotline is staffed 24-hours Monday - Friday This repoct is prepared and printed in house by Traci Erickson, ANOMS Speciatist Questions or comments may be directed to: MAC - Aviation Noise & Satellite Program Minneapolis / St Paul Intemafional Airport 6040 28th Avenue Soutli Minneapolis, MN 55450 Tel: (612) 725-6331, Fax: (612) �25-6310 ANSP Home Page: http://www macavsatorg �.. ' , C C. Metropolitan Airports Commission. Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs - � � 0 Opes�a�ions and C`omplaint Summary 1 Operations Summary - All A.ircraft .....................................................................................1 MSP June Fleet Mix Percenta.ge ..........................................................................................1 Airport June Complaint Summary .......................................................................................1 June Operations Summary - Auport Directors Office .........................................................1 Minneapolis = St.101aullnternaiional Ai�port Complaant Summary 2 ComplaintSummary by City ...............................................................................................2 Available Time for Runway Use 3 TowerLog Reports - All� Hours ................................................:......................................:...3 Tower Log Reports - Nighitime Hours .........................:......................................................3 1-� rl 0,�'78iClti0i2S 9� , RunwayUse Report June 1996 ............................................................................................4 �C117'l8)' J6t o�G'1'lltlOiZS J Runway Use Report June 1996 ............................................................................................5 ��.. Nighttime - All Operations 6 Runway Use Report June 1996 .......................:........:..............••--•--......................................6 , , � , , ��� i � RunwayUse Report June 1996 ............................................................................................7 i � � /r'� i � � �� , Aircraft Identifier and Description �'able 9 Runway Use - Day/Night Periods - All Operations 10 DaytimeHours ...................................................................................................................10 Community Ove�ightAnalysis 11 �� Cazrier Jet Operations - All Hours .....................................................................................11 \� � Carrier Jet Operati.ons - Nightti.me (11pm - 6 am) .............................................................11 M , Remo�e Mon�to�zng 5ite .�ocat�ons �'2 Carfzer Jet Arrival I2elated Noise Events 13 Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT .....................................................13 Carrier Jet Departure .Related Noise Events 14 Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ..,,... � ..................14 Ten LoudestAarcraftNoise Events Ident�fied Ten LoudestAircraft Noise Events Identzfzed Ten Loudest Azrc�-aft Noise Events I�entz, f, fzed Ten Loudest Axrc�°aft Noase Events Identz, fied T'en �oudest.A�ircraft Noise E�ents Iden�i, jied Z'en LoudestAircraft Noise Events Identified Flight Track Base Map 21 , . . , I Airport Noise and Operations 1Vlon�to�zng System Flaght Tracks 22 -��. Carrier Jet Operati.ons - June 1996 ............................. „_,,,,,,.,,,.22 .......................................... �' Airport Noise and Operations Monatnrang System �light Tracks 23 Carrier Jet Operations - lune 1996 ................................. .......................23 ............................. Aarport No�se sznd Operations Monitoring System Flight T�acks 24 Carrier Jet Ope'rations - June 1996 .................................................................................... 24 Airport Noise and Operat�ons Mon�toring System Flight Tracks 25 Carrier 7et Operations - June 1996 .................................................................................... 2S Analysis of A�rcraft Noise Events s Aireraft �dn dB(A) 26 Analysis of �.ircraft Noise E�ents - Aircraft Ldn dB(�.) � 27 * � 0 � `� 0 � Metropolitan Airports Commission C�perations and. Complaint Summary June 1996 Operations Summary - All Aircraft Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. MSP June Fleet Mix Percenta.ge Airport June Complaint Summary June Operations Summary - Airport Directors Office . . _. _ _ �r ., ,. . .,.. _ . Metropolitan Airports Commission �Minneapol�s - St. l'aul Inter°national Airport Complaint Summary June 1996 Complaint Summary by City pao� 7. Time of Day Nature of Complaint A_S_a:� �►7_e__ n n .. •r.. .. � . � Metropolitan Airports Commission Ava�lable Time for Runway Use Tower Log Reports - June 1996 � A11 Hours �>:':.::::i�;°�`a::`:::; A.,,.......... `.:::.;;�5:°�::::' - .............. ............. � 0 0 ::>:<:;� »>C�'�.°�.....`i�:: Nighttime Hours :�<::::;�:�i�>.: �� r::;;:��' o:: ::',?:���::. � ;°�� ;::::>::> � �: `� `a; `::.. . Metropolitan Airports Commission 0 PaaP 4 � �l C�peraiions I�unway �Tse �2eport June 19 6 _�:>:::::::::��;� �a �`'>��`�r�°l��`': . �:::���:�'�''o::€:<:;. .:::;::��;�;:��.:�:. � ..zz 1 � or'`��� /�,�� ;:> : :��::��::;:::::::: ;�>' .:::>4�;�;�o:;. Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. A.«..ar� AT____ ti n _...... �. `� . , • � 1' . 1 . , . Use Report June 19 6 <::<::::<:;���;��: Metropolitan Airports Commission Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. Metropolitan Airports Commission r , ^'c_ • • � , ,� � � ; . �' �r�, . �'i1 . 1l, � �, � .� [vote: / hree days of ARTS dntg tnissing. Page 6 A�;ah�, t�t�;�p .� ca� �r..., a.__..__ . �� Metropolitan Airports Commission N1g11tt1Ille �ai'ilei' Jeti �pel'�.�lOI1S Runway iJse Report June 19 6 ::::::::;>:<�:a:�: Note: Three dcrys of ARTS data missing. Aviatiafn Noise & Satellite Pro�rams Pa�e 7 . Metropolitan Airports Commission � � � . , � Page 8 � ' ' � �. �, ,� �. . . ��� .� : . , . ., ., : :. :��. � �• � � 1 � • � � I�� � � � n 1� :1 :• � ., : : M ' � • : 0 224 797 163 5 2177 0 0 307 0 934 83 2535 23 1974 910 12 25 1003 19 0 3576 1446 73 6138 34 0.0% 1.0% 3.5% 0.7% 0.0% 9.7% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.4% 4.1% 0.4% 11.3% 0.1% 8.8% 4.1% 0.0% 0.1% 4.5% 0.1% 0.0% 15.9% 6.5% 0.3% 27.3% 0.2% Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. Aviation N�tire & �arPii�ro u.,,.,,...,.... . . • � � � , ��; /; . . i • ,- ,� Metropolitan Airports Commission -- � , r� � . � 1� � � ,� � ::::>:::::::::>;.<.:::::>::::::::::>:::;>::::>:::::<:;>::::::::>::::::>::::><;:>:::::::::::::<:>::<:::::::�::::>�:::<:::: �::>::::::> :<:::>:::::::..w.. .� . :.:::.::;:;<;.::.::.>:.>:;::;:.::;:..:::.,:<.: >;:::>;:;>;:>:::::>::.:::.::.::::>:.;:.;;:;::.::.::>:.::.;:::.;;:::::::.>:::.>:.;:.;:.::.;:.:::.::.::.::.::.>::.>:<.::: :::<:>:::::::�:>:;:>::>::::.: ::::<:>:<:::::�::: �:>:::::>::>::>::>:::::>::>:::::;:::>:::<:::>::;<:�;:<:::»::>:::>::>:::::>::>:::::>::<::::>:::::�:::�::>::>::>::><:<:::�:.:>::._:.; ::::.::. ::... K ..:..<.:.�.:::::::.�:::::::::::::::::.�::::.�::::::::::.;::::::::::::::.::::.»:: .x......:...: .:::: . .::::::::::::..�::::.�::::::::::.�.�::::::::::::.:.�.::<.::.::::.:.:: . . � ; : :.�x�::<=::::::::>::::::::;:<:>::;>::::>::;::>::::::::::::>::::::<:>::::;::>:<:>:<:::>::>::;>:::::>::: ::�. . >:::::::. � u=��r� ............... ..... . .:::»::> :::::::::::>::::>:::;:::>::;:::::::>::::>::<:::>::>;:>::::>::::>::::>:::::>::::>:::::::>:;:<::::><::::::t�: :. .:.:.���.�.�.�� ::::: .::::::.�::::::::::::::::::::::::.........................:...::::.........................:::: :.:::::::::: .::: :.::::::::::::::::::::::._:::.�::::::::.�:.�::::: ::.::::...............::. .....�.: :.::::::.� :::::::::::::.�::.�:::.�.:::::::::::::::::::::::: :.:::::: :.:::::. B707 . BOEING 707 B727 BOEIlVG 727 B727Fi BOEII�TG 727 - HUSH K1T B733/4/5 BOEIIV'G 737-3Q0/400/500 B737 . BOEIlVG 737100/200 SEIt�S B747 � BOIING 747 B74F BOEING 747 FREIGIiTER B757 BOEING 757 � �. B'767 BOEIlVG 767 BA10 BRTTISH AIItOSPACE 125 BAll BRTTISH AIItOSPACE 111 BA46 BRTITSH AIItOSPACE 146 CL65 CANADAIIt 650 DA10 FALCON 10 DC10 MCDONNEGL DOUGLAS DC10 DC8 MC:DONNELs. DOUGLAS DC8 , DC87 MCDONN�L DOUGLAS DC8 70-SII2IES RE DC9 MCDOrfNE�LL DOUGLAS DC9 DC9H MGDONNEi I, DOUGLAS DC9 HUSH K1T EA31 AIltBUS INDUSTRIES A310 EA32 AIItBUS INDUSTRIES A320 FK10 FOKI�t 100 FK27 POI�Eit F27 (PROP) FK28 FOHI�RR F28 L1011 LO� TRISTAR L1011 1VID11 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DCIl MD80 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 80-SE122IE.S SW3 SVVEARINGEN METROLINER 3 SW4 SWF.ARINGEN METROLINIIt 4 SF34 SAAB 340 Aviation Noise 8c Satellite Programs Page 9 Metropolitan Airports Commission , � ' � , " � � � � / � , �; ,, . �' ' . 1 1 ,� . • , �' , • � � , • 1 1;� Daytime Hours Nighttime Hours Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. Pa�e 10 Aviafirtn Nn��o .4� C�talt,ro n.....___ Metropolitan Airports Comm.ission Community Overflight Analysis Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport June 1996 Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (11pm - 6 am) Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. Aviation Noise & Satellite ProQrams Pa�e l l Metropolitan A.irports Commission �� Remote Monitoa-ing Site Locations Airport l�toise and 4perations Monitoring Systexn Page 12 AviaN�,�, rr�,� � cat n;.e u_�-- (. � � Metropolitan Airpor'w Commission . . . � . . � � . , . . . Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ;:::<.::.,::>::>::::::::;:::::::>:::<::>:=:::>:>«::::::::::::>::.::=::>::>;:>:::>�::::�::::;: :.>:.::;.;:.:.:.>:.;:::.::.;:.:.;:.::.>:.::;.;:.::.;:�:;::.;:.:::.: .;;:.;:.::.:;.;:.;:.::.:.::.:;::.::.::.::.::.;:.;:.;:;:.;;;�.::::.;:.:<.;:.; ......�,�"�:�� <>::: ::::> ::::>::>::;::>::»::;::: ::.::.::.;:.: : .::: ::::>::> ::::::: ::: ::: :.::.;:::.::::.�::. :::::::;;<:>::»>::>; :.::::;::: . ... ..................::::.::.:.;?:::::::::::............... ...... ........................... ..... . . .s:::::«<::;:�::;•;::::::::.::::.. ...::...::::: ::::.�'sY�`iI�S: .: . :...:�,''kr'�:�1�•:::. ..::. . . .... .:::: .. . . . .;:;.: :::::::::::::::::.:::.�:::.:::::::::::::::::: :: .:�:::::::::::::::::::::: : . . . . . ... . � . .. .. .. . . . ............................:..:.::.....:.::..........:.�:.::::...�+�.*.ir.�'aCi:�,�.::::.::�..�..��.Y.r;�:i':��.:.�. ::<:::::>::>:::;:.��� >�<::;:::»::::::::»::::>::>;: :::s::::� . � . :. : � :.::;.::.:>:.::;.;:.;:;.::<.::.;:.;:::.;::.:;:.::. . ......................�.. . �'v.����:�..•; : .:. . . ;:� �::.� :. i� ::::::::<::::::::::::::;:::::::::::;::::::s::: :?.;.::;;:::::>:::s:::.::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::}::::s$����'�::.':::::::;::::::::::;::::::::::;_<::�::::::: <>::»:::::>:. : : ::::::<:»::::: ::;:::,::::: ::.................. ........... ......... ....... . . :.�. .. . . ............ :....'��...��:�...: �..:::��:::.:.:::: .:: .. : . . .::......::. :.. . . . . .... ......... . . :.::.�:::: . : :.:�:::.� . :::::::::::::.�::::::::::::�'.:..:�::::.�:::.::::::..::::.� ::��...:..::.:.::.::::::::: :.:.................:............................. ..... . . ..:.. .:... .. . . ::::: .:::: ... ::::.::.:.::��.::. : . : :>:. >::>::::::>::�:::::.:::>:.:. .;:.::>:.:.::.::;.::.;:.::.::.::.::>:.::<.::.::.::.::.::.::>::.;:.::.:::.::.::.:::.::.:::»:<::.:�:::>:.::.:;:.::.:.:::.>:.:::>::>:::::::::;:«:>:<:»>:::;::>::::>::::>::;::>::;:::::::>::>::::>::::»::>.... . .. . . . ::<:::::::::�:. . . . ::::::> :»:<;. , . . : : :::::>:::.:;:. : :. . . . :<.: ..... .... ���:�..... .....��C��..... .....��i�...:. ::: �:�.��:c��.:.: 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue-& 41st Strcet 2798 63 0 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 1661 127 0 0 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmont Avenue 2842 1309 38 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 2874 957 3 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 32�0 2618 426 1 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th St�et 2543 1742 502 7 7 Richfield Wentworth Avenue & 64th Sireet 38 8 0 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 19 2 0 0 9 St. Paul Sazatoga Stc�et & Iiartford Avenue 23 0 0 0 10 St. Paui Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 14 2 0 0 11 S� Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 6 1 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton Street & Rackwood Avenue 8 1 0 0 (� ��� 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 7 1 0 0 14 Eagan First Slxeet & McKee Street 2499 82 1 0 ., 15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Lexington Avenue 107 17 0 0 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue & Vilas Lane 1'538 860 4 0 ,17 Bloom7ngton 84th Street & 4th Avenue 32 1 0 0 18 Richfield 75th Street &.17th Avenue 29 1 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 25 0 0 0 20 Richfield 75th Street & 3rd Avenue 16 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights , Barbara Avenue & 67th Sireet 71 1 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 1001 4 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kenndon Avenue 900 9' 2 0 24 Eagan Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 2107 10 0 0 Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. Aviation Noise & Satellite Pro�rams Pa�e 13 Metr�opolitaa tlirports Commission ,' •' • �•� • � � ,% •� � . , . � ��� Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ;:i;�':i�i .'::i:'�>�<'::::::'i;:''::i:;;>::>;i?:�:};`:�i.y::::ii::;:;;;��:2:ii:''::::::S�i:�'i :'::::3�:i:>���:i:�::i>`�'S%i`::':i�:>�:r�i'i�i:��;:��`�>i:�:::i:::i::::;:;;�`t;::�:::'::?�:;::::::ii':;::::;::::::;':'i;J i.::::::'�:':';:::.�iSi:r:��:; :::::.:::. :.:.:?;;::;:i:::;::;ii:ii:�:?:::?::i:'?::?':::;;:i:ii:i::::::::::.i<.;;r:;;??;:.;.;; :?;:;;:?'::",:;;:;:;;::;:;;;:;;;:;:;:;:': ....:..: �:::::. ::.�:. a :c.>::::ei.is:>:;::.•p::>:'. : •p:.::..::: :. :.�:::i;t::::>...::.;xt-..�:. .:.�: . . . ..:: ...: . . . .... .::.: :. . .... ....: :. � . xa: ..:::........ ....:. ..:::::.. . .. .. :. .: ............. .....�".K4��S.�:: .:.. .:::. ::::. . . . ...... .... . . .�:. ::::>:::>:;::::>;»:::::>:;:::>::»>: �•;:.:<,:;:;,:;.>:;.:>:. >::: : ::»:;:.>::>::>::::s::>:<:: :::::>:: ::..., :.: . : .:. : . . ..... ............ . ...�i'Y�1�. ::. � :::::. . .......... .::::::::::.: �:. �::. :. . ....:::::::..:. �:::. .:.�.: : . . . . . . . : . . . :. .:. . . �. �. :...........:::::.::::::::: ::::::::. _::::::: ......:::. :::::,,��,',:��Ci:�,��,..;:.:.: :;.::;,.��,t,.:S?:�TE�R:::: .�.�::::::...���. • • :::::::::::::::::::..:::: . :......... ......... � ..... . •.. . . : .. ... . .. :; .: :. . . .:.�:..:::.::.;:.:>:;::<:::.�:::::::: .::::::::::::::.:::.:>::::.:.::::::::::::::::::.�:::.�:::::::::::::::::::.::.;::::::: . . � . .����:�: . . .... .......... . .::.....::::: :.:::::::...............::. :::::.�.�.::::::::::.�.�::: .�:.� :..:...........:::::: ::::::«:>s:::> : :: >:;:::>::>:::: ;::>:::::>::;;:>:�:.:<.:;:::.�:::.�'..:::::;.:;;:.>:;;::.::.: :,::, :... . ............................ .��`�.���?b�..... ......... . . ..... ........ .. ..... ......... . .. ...... ....... .. ............... .......:.� .: :.::.�.:�:.::::.�:::.� ........::::::::::::::::.::::::::::::....:.:::��.::::::::::.:::::::.......:..�.:::::::.�:::::.�::::::.:�:::.......::::.::.::..:: .. : ...::::.::....... .: . .:::::::.:... . .. ...........: : . .:. .::. ::::::::.� :::::::::. :.::.......:::::::.�:::::.� :.:::..�:............:..::::::::::::::...................:::::.:�::::::::::::::.�::::::::::::....::::::::::::..::::. • �»: :>::: ::: �.�::�.�:.: ::>:: : »: :: . . : ::::::::::................. ..::::.�::.�::::::::..........:....::::::::::.:�..::::::........:::.�::.�::::::.�.�::.::�::.�:........................:::.� :.::::::.. ... . .. ..? `»::: sst:�>::^;.: • . .;�::: ::.:..::. : ;;:. .;:.;::.�:.:.:.:.:::;.:.;;:.>:.::.;:.: :.;;:.::.:�:;.;::.;;;:.;::::,:.:::;:.::.;:;;,:;.>:<,:.;:.:>;;; :;:.::.;•;::;.::.::;<.:::.::.::.>;::::.::.::.::.;:.>:;:.:;:::.:.;>:::.;::;.::.;:;.;::;::.::.;:;.:;::.;:.>:::;:.. . ...��.� .....:.:� ::::::..:....... ..................:::::::........................ .....::::..................................:::::::::::::::::....................::::..::::....................................:�..... ...::�:���::>::z::::>::��:��.: . s>:: ................:..::::::: :........................:. �:::: :................ .........:::::..............................................:::: •:::.................. ....::::::: :•: :•::.::...... ....................::::::. ........................... ............... t��... ........... ........................... ..::::::::.�::::::::::: ::.: :::::::.;:.::>:.:•:::.::>:�;;::;;: �::.::.::.::.::;.;;:.::.::.;:.::.::;::. 1 M'inneapolis Xences Avenue & 41st S�reet 728 158 2 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Sireet 64b 114 2 p 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmont Avenue 1537 239 15 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 1369 609 54 1 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 4272 1701 605 S1 6 Minueapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Slreet 5389 1927 875 211 7 RichS�eld Wentworth Avenue & 64th Stneet 907 430 53 0 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 1172 364 13 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & FIaztford Avenue 12 0 p p 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 23 4 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn Street & Scheffer Avenue 11 0 0 0 12 St. Paul Alton Srneet & Rockwood Avenue. 8 0 0 0 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 1114 � 322 3 0 14 Eagan ' First Street & McKee Sireet 1514 639 44 p 15 Mendota }�3eights Cullen Street & Lexingtan Avenue 1186 541 45 0 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue & V'�las Lane 1711 1188 152 3 1'� Bloomington � 84th Street & 4th Avenue 28 1 0 p 18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 31 0 0 0 19 Bloomington ldth Avenue & 84th Street 40 0 0 0 20 Richfield 75th Street & 3rd Avenue 37 2 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights B.arbara Avenue & 67th Sbreet 791 116 0 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail 477 179 0 0 23 Mendota F3eights End of Kenndon Avenue 1906 1169 530 48 �' �g� Chapel Lane & Wren Lane 750 90 0 0 Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. Page 14 Aviation Naitc: RL �arPit,tP »����,,,� Metropolitan Airports Comm.ission Ten LOudest Aircraft No�se Events Identified RIVIT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st S� Minneapolis RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. Minneapolis Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. ' Minneapolis RMT #4: Oakland A�e. & 49th St. Minneapolis Metropolitan Airports Commission , . . Ten Loud.esi Aircraft Noise Events Identified RMT #5: 12th A�e. & 58th S� Minneapolis RMT #�7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. `` Richfield Pa�e 16 A,>;ar;.,.,'nT..:,.,, a. r_.r�,:._.,, RMT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th St. Minnea.polis RMT #8: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. Minneapolis Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. C '. Meh�opolitaa Airports Commission Ten I.�oudest Aircraft Noise Events Id.entified. RMT ##9: Saratoga S� & Hartford Ave. St. Paul � RMT #ll: Finn St. & ScheFfer Ave. St. Paul O6/27/96 9:00:50 06/30/'96 9:07:57 06/19/96 20:03:48 06/Z8/'96 6:57:03 06/OS/96 6:21:11 06rL5/96 14:01:04 06/08/9617:15:12 06/05/96 11:53:24 06/13/'96 8:46:21 06/OS/96 6:45:48 Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. 82.1 79.9 79.4 78.8 74.0 73.0 705 70.3 70.1 70.0 RMT #10: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. S� Paul RMT #12: Alton S� & Rockwood Ave. S� Faul Metropolitan Air��orts Commission • �: � • • , � , . . � , . �, RMT #13: Southeast End of Mohican Court Mendota Heights RMT #15: Cullon St. & Lexington Ave. '` Mendota. Heights Parne 1 R A.....a:.._. �r_�__ n_ n_._.... �. � RMT #14: lst S� & McKee St. Eagan RMT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane Eagan Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. � � C Metropolitan Airports Comm.ission ' i Ten Loud.est Aircraft Noise Evemts Iclentified '� RMT #17: 84th St. & 4th Ave. Bloomington RMT #19: 16th A�e. & 84th St. �'� Bloomington Note: Three days of ARTS data missing. RMT #18: 75th St. & 17th Ave. Richfield RMT #Z0: 75th S� & 3rd Ave. Richfield � Metropolitaa A.irports Commission � • � �,. . �, �; , , � . . �; RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th St. Inver Grove Heights � RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave. � ' � Mendota. Heights RMT #22: Anne Marie Trail Inver Grove Heights RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Eagan � Note: Three days ofARTS data missing. PagP �.n n.a...:.._. ,.r�__ a.. o_._,,.. ,,. C , ^ Metropolitan Airports Commission , ~.� ; ; �; �. F�igh� TiraCk �aSe Map Airport liToise and Operations Monitoring System � 7 1. i:� _ ` 4 ��t.ln , . ,.y • �s a W/u:.:l \�,,,.� ..� ,.. . �� :I . _. . .��::. .. � ;'�;�y � � � , � +�i�v- .. —.�va�a��w� i lp � rt, �. i w� �,►" c. -�"_. --.....� �4ti; tiiri g�+l���� �y�t,��\e 3 :, - S . �i'r n1�► +�t li � r �. ��� / �1 i �,� 3 �. t � �.�`.�IC�'���0 . , , . ,_,.�.:._-..�i ..� �:::��.,•i .. -�:a:•.. �•- j � :.� •. : , � �.- :_..-�.��'. . .. -� ,;-,+a�: � ti �� 3 �w . �. _�_'�� J! t 1 + �+`� -s2 .. '\4 y 1�j1 \M _` � � ���ll�N \ � _ . . . .I' ����f �\\ ' . ..+,� 11 �� � it► �V } � �.f f� �� �� . � a i`, nli1 ��r► r�✓j � nr �'r' ; �\ •} o: �"+.ii11� �����,I,�1��►�� 'I i `'^.'i3Y�\��Il���1���!�n�il�q��,ll��'��I��'' �r ,` � ��� a � . , � ^�' ..+s� �\� V11 � �`� �IU�F:t � li�d �� �1r� un C ..�' � �J f►�ii/��j%4 `��"'- ai', �r%� d' r ,!ti z ' �i � 1l..J . l. �y. .�. r� ����I� � � ����� � \\`\\\;. * ' ,; .tH ��. I��•�A�;\�\��;� t\` �• � , � , _,y,J +•�_,�\,\�` 1t �M\~ � 1 ._ � ..... . .._ �. :�, � i � !•�� :'x��. �.\l\��! . ��i. . i.�t'�,. .x� `\ � 1i n .. —� �� �` �� �``.� \, , r�� ! . ��. . � . ` tl \ �\�=��,; ` ar `/ � i � � �. � � . ����.i � 1!� � f L 1 � �\�►��\\��` ��� \� � � ^"�. `... �� �• � ..�= . . � �. � �\� \ \� �` ,�t� � � \`\� a �. , � e �� -�-^. ' • � n�:.�t � l� ... � �` � � � � . �n ��� \ ���,,1�,�ti .� � ��` �; � ``„�� �� �� i . r :+.- \�`\���I���i���,�`'�+ � r . /�; . �. "?1'� ''�� ���.j�r i �t ' �. :; �D. J ? � A.' ' , ;, +.cr.�i,��r.•� . . � a s t :�l�i,'�`��`��}� . � � 11 �\���\,: J��,�� � �� ' � � �,\,\`\��j`i!!'•`�%j`��\i � � � , Z!�� ��� ��� � ♦ . � �• ��\`� •� =�t�i�i�;1`►,�� :� � �y4 ... 5 i \ `' �„ • I �i . r ., I �}: + ` `� \r.`�� ``��� '� � r `�:r;>` �\� ��'l�. , R ,��; �� � j� � �i., ��y�. ��� � ;, l.� y� � . : . .,, a -, !:• ''� � +., : '�,1���, � , s• , :: . . ; � ,: ,si �,,� .: rilJ,. �: � •�,•t, z�� ��,��:i,.;� i 1 t "o- ^� .�� t �t► � �t;;..;•� . ._.. �.. ... _ . . . ... ... ....a__.o... .. ... . . .. .,. � ` t`\`\`! '��'� � t - i>�\ � �1� \`t � • � � �1t�`�\\►� � ���,�..�!i��;, �'`: =:��•�i/►r >.�-. . . •• �` <����nr : `,'�. `\ `=. . rr: t , ;�, �� +� ��� - 'ti � _ � . i y `R� �:,�, ±' ( ♦ - . � r V c� \r m� � . y„ � ,,,� ,.���;;rt,i,,,,; „ �:� , ;�,���� ��\r `�, � .i ; -���11��i ,�i�\''����1 . � ��'�'� � ,"�• � = p^t �1����. � �1- .:1} .. „� . r ��• i• „�.� ' _ .��.. r �a � . � 1 t'I/A C . J��. � .i�t1/�t�� '�.� . � �1 �`'�, 1�1'���1�11 "i' ^ \ •' ` [„ ��i��l ya ,1 �.� `1 ' r „"" : �'� .: : > , � .► �►�.._ ;",�. � , ..�'..r =e: =� . :. r ��:.�— • . �--.-.'�.-....--.,,�:j \ c e . ��..; �..- ; � � + �� '.--�'-�!�11�\r�.:`\��\� cr t a�-* =A►1l;+. � , '����c.� � ' It"�'ri��:����►\!►:l..,,; � , _. � . . . .. .. .. � � �� ���� ,� � . `�►..�.,. �„ � •+ « ` . r. � \ �a n ���,`�� ���...?te,��S 'i. ��� i .� .. � \� i�� ����\� . � i ) � T� '„C•�„ Y �\ \ y \ 1 � , �b �l� , ` . 1 � �.�.. \`` � „ ` � , \i . '� : � a . � .` -�.�.,_,\`. \ �?M � �. /// i-`� ��� � . _\ . '-..... ...�... ..1 �, ! .(i 111�` � � `: � w 1� ��� \ . ' r � �-, 1'' '4 � _ I"�'I %�`�'�� r •. ' .��:.1 �_/,y� ��' 11/6� �.� ', ��i�IN �`G. �'\�, ' h, ;;',t''\,\���`t - ' `���,\��;'j'� ' +.�z<�►��` ��`' ���� . • t ,���� \� `�jj`� ��', ,, � : � �� . .� 1'�jn i-^, i � ' '� ♦ . , i !'��'�� . �.7 5 � � ♦ �� . i { f. � �.�l� �� t .1 i� .' . ��+.�a. � � f . �S . .i .,\• `: � '���' � �i��4,. �` .� .�� :: �i t t •, i•�', ��• . , ... . _ . _ .... . o .. �. . . , �.q' l.•• Metropolitan AirPorts Comm.ission Analysis of A.ircraft Noise Events - Aircraft I.,cln d�(A) June Ol to June 30,1996 � Noise Monitor Locations `���::::;�x`r''>`>::;::<;< :`::,;}. �:`.>::i.;;..:;:; ..::;,;.. �';'.;::;;<,:;;> ;:"::;`.y><:,,>:::::::;` :::::;::::;:::::::'� ��>�:> :::>::>:>»:.>; ::::::::: ::::::i ������ <��::::::>`': :::::€�::>� S;.>`:::>'::::: <::>?:<i�::`:<'<:::::>:;; ::::::::>:�:::::::::::::�:::::: :::::::<::>:>:::>::::::::<:: :::<:>::;:«<::::::::::::::: :>::<:>:::::::>:: � �::>:: ::::.:�::::�,:��.� :..:: :::::�.::::: .:::::�� .::::..::::: . . .:�:.�..:::.�. . .::::: :::::. :. .�::: .::.�: . .::::: .�:::. .: :::::: .:::::. .�::: .::::: . .::::..:::: . .:::. .�::: . :..�.: ;::: ....:.::::: :.:::.�::::::::.� :::::::.:::::::::::::::::: .::::::::::.:::::..::.�;..�..�.�.:.�:..:::::�:: :::::::.�:.� . :::.:: .::::. .::::::::::. ..:::::: .::::. � .:.�:: ..:�.� ::::.:.:::. : ..:::.:::: .. .:.�:...::. .. :::: ::::::::::::::.�:::::::::. ::.�::::.�::::::: .:::::.::::::.�::..::.�::::::::�:::..:._::::: �:.::::: :.:::...#.�.�.�:,:.: .:::::�::.::: :::::. .: ::..�:: :.:::: . . :.�:: .:.�:. :. :::::..::.: : . . :::. :::: . .: .::::. ::::. .. :: :::: ........:::::::::.�::.:::. ......::::::::::: .:...:...:.�:::.:..:::.�:....::: ::...::::::...:::::.�: ::::::.......:::: .::::::.� :.:::::.. ....:�`..�::: .:...�: ::.: .::.:��:::::. :..�: .. . :.�. :.::. . .. ..... ::: .. . :.�: . .................. .:.:�.�::::::::.�. :.:::.:>::::::::::..:::::::.:.::::::.�: :::: :.::,:.:>;::::: .::::::: :.:::::::.;::.:.::�:: :.:::::: :.:�:.:.:.�:::::::: :.:::::.:�::::::::..::: �:�t#:::. ::::���:::;: .::: : .. .::: ���.:.. ..... .................. :::::::::::::::::. :.::::::::.::::.::.::. ..:::.:::.>;:.>::;:::<:>: ::>:::::»:<:::>::>::::::::: :::>:::::::::;:::::>::>:::::: ::<:>.::::>::>:::�:>::::::; ::<:::€:>::<:::>::>:>::: 1 55.0 57.5 56.7 64.4 71.8 76.5 56.3 59.0 * 40.1 * * 2 -* 45.3 48.0 59.6 70.3 78.8 58.3 55.4 * 40,7 � * 3 525 49.8 44.4 53.3 69.7 75.3 59.4 52.1 42.0 4.6.3 * � 4 49.7 58.1 57.3 64.3 72.4 77.4 58.7 52.2 * 42.9 42.3 � 5 57.1 62.1 66.2 65.0 70.9 72.8 * 41.1 * 55:1 45.5 40.4 6 48.2 56.6 565 57.2 67.0 72S 50.0 47.8 * 49.1 * * 7 * * * * � * * * * * * � $ �* * 542 54S 69.7 75.7 54.1 52.3 4'7.2 43.1 43.3 41.8 9 45.9 * 63.1 60.1 72.6 712 56.9 58.7 49.2 * � � 10 47.8 � 56.1 56.� 69.0 '70.6 62.2 42.0 * 40.6 '� 42.9 11 * � * * � * * * � � * � 12 45.6 * 53.8 S35 72.1 76.7 57.9 59.8 * 46,2 * �= 13 46.9 40.4 51.6 60.8 73.1 785 60.5 56.3 ' 41.0 42.8 * 43.2 14 50.2 52.7. 57.7 58.9 71.1 73.6 60S 47.9 * 43.5 � * 15 52.2 54.1 59.4 59S 675 70.3 * * 42.7 46,1 * * 16 545 55.3 59.3 58.3 65.9 67.6 42.8 * * 47.4 * * 1? 54.8 56.0 58.7 57.9 721 �7.6 62.3 559 * 4p,� * q;q, q, 18 56.� 55.7 59.9 60.3 725 76.1 64.4 4b.4 � * � � 19 52A 56A 615 622 73..4 782 57.3 565 41.1 42.6 40.0 45.6 20 46.4 46.9 55.2 63.6 73.1 78.9 57.3 55.7 * 45.6 .* � 21 62.7 62.2 60S 69.7 79.3 73.1 60.8 69.0 ' 46.6 56.7 50.0 54.0 22 43.7 43.8 45.9 52.1 68.1 73.1 60.8 51.3 * 41.2 * * 23 55.6 53.3 61.9 56.7 68.8 73.6 49.7 43.1 * 49,7 qp,g * 24 52A 45.2 60.1 61.8 75.7 �9.4 59.3 59.1 * 43.0 * * 25 51.9 ` 53.9 60.0 61.3 * 73.0 53.0 43.4 * 49.2 40.4 41.8 26 52.0 56.3 61.2 62.4 69.6 73.3 55.2 45.6 * 43.7 * 41.0 27 50.8 51.9 58.9 57.1 65A 70.4 * 45.3 * 48.6 49.8 41.8 28 51.8 55.0 60.6 61.9 66S 70.� * 46.5 43.7 55.0 47.3 47.4 29 _ 42.8 47.4 50.4 57.0 69.6 77S 57.6 53.7 * *" * 40.4 30 48.3 47.3 52.6 67.9 67.9 77.3 61.2 51.9 * * 4p.6 * Mo. Ldn 52.7 55.1 60.4 61.1 71.5 765 58.4 56.9 48.7 47.0 47.2 49.3 * 7.... •L_ ...... .r.,..w� �vMI ItVNI J V� ({({:Q Q�%i�1e ai %u% Q(niiQft �ufisei (ivPitiis D.,,.,. 7c C 4 I' j Metropolitan Airports Commission t�,.nalysis of Aircraft l�toise Events -.�.ircraft Ldn dB(A) June 01 to June 30,1996 Noise Monitor Locations >::>:<::;::;::>::>::>:::::>::>::;>::>�:>:::>::>:::::>::>:::;>::::::>::»::<::>::>:::<::� >::»>:::>:<:»::>:::::::::>:::�>: :'.; ::..:.;:�::.�>.,.:: :::;::�`:::€: :..:::�.�> ::::..:::::::::::::;:;��.��`:::;: ::::::::���.::���:�:�:�:;:::::; ::��:::�'��''�`:>::: :::>:;:: ::..::::::;::<::::;:>:::<:.:>::>::....::::::>:::� :::>::;::.:�.:::��:;:<:> :::::>:::::.:>:.:::::;::::>::;: � :::::::':: :: . � ' '::::::..::: :;:::: :: �:.. :>::::: :::;:. ;: ::. ::::>::: ::<�:: .; ::.. �:::;>: :::;::: ... ..��... ...:...�1�,�+�..:::.. ::::��.:::. :: :�:��:.:::..::::��..�.�'...�:: ::::��:�:::: :::;�1�`.._:. ::.: �:�$.::::.:.� .:...... :.:.:: .:............... :: :....... �.::.:.::: ##�:..:::: .:::#,'�:... ................. 1 42.5 55.8 48.8 63.3 * 45.1 * * * 50.0 61.7 49.6 2 55.0 59.4 _46.4 63.2 49.8 * 45.6 45.7 44.7 50.9 552 41.4 3 * 59.6 � 47.5 63.8 47.6 * * 40.8 * 56.0 55.0 52.5 4 46.3 58.9 51,9 64S 42.4 42.2 * * 48.4 49.0 67.2 44.2 $ 495 552 58.1 * 4$.l 48.6 48.1 * 42.5 49.1 67.1 41.3 6 43.0 602 44.9 652 49.9 47.6 * * 48.6 45.0 70.4 45.2 � � * * * * � * * * * * * $�' � 45.7 61S 50.5 58S * 43.9 * * 55.6 46.6 54.5 40.3 9 . 45S 56.9 51.6 64.2 �* 415 * * 49.0 42.1 62.0 42.3 10 48.0 69.1 55.1 66.9 * 43.3 * * 44.6 45.3 652 40.5 11 * * * * * * * � * * * * 1,2 * 58.3 49.6 60.1 * * * * 44.7 44.1 48.8 * 13 * 572 49.3 61.8 * * * * 42.5 46.3 45.8 * 14 50.6 57.1 51.7 65.3 44S 40S 41.2 49.2 47.8 48.0 66.6 * 15 59.4 615 60.4 64.7 * * * * 50.6 49.5 68.8 50.3 16 50.6 57.8 55.4 63.9 * 47.0 * * 51.1 44.0 66.3 40.8 1'7 42.8 57.3 51.1 61.9 40.7 405 * 44.1 43.8 47.4 71.2 45.9 18 49.1 56.4 45.4 64.6 46.1 46.2 46.0 43.6 46.9 51.4 70.8 47.7 19 51.0 61.4 54.4 65.9 40.8 45.4 * * 44.0 52.8 625 48.2 2p 57.4 57.4 * 63.4 40.6 48.6 * * 49.1 46.8 69.4 42.3 21 65.5 68.6 * 73.1 552 64.9 55.9 59.8 61.4 61.9 78.4 54.3 22 48.4 51.7 482 56.7 46S 40.3 * * 41.3 43.3 71.0 53.4 23 49.3 56.7 54.0 63.0 * * * * 41.0 49.8 69S 40S 24 * 58.8 48.8 63.9 40.4 49.6 41.5 * 45.9 55.1 64.2 45.5 25 45S 57.8 60.7 58.7 40.9 * * * 50.1 49.� 58.3 51.0 26 54.0 63.5 59.5 60.9 * 46.9 48S * 56.3 47.7 76.1 42.5 27 55.0 62.1 60.1 67.2 * * * * 48.8 53.3 70.2 50.1 28 62.0 61.9 63.4 * * * * * 56.0 54.1 65.4 45.8 29 56.4 55.6 40.7 61.4 * 44.2 * * * 4'7.3 59.1 45.7 30 52.1 55.5 * 61.5 * * * * * 43.6 74.3 48.3 Mo. Ldn 56.9 60.9 57.1 64.4 41.9 49.8 41.6 45S 50.4 51.7 72.9 48.3 * Less Jhan lwe»ty faur haurs ofdata aNailable or no ai�rafi' noise everas e�,;�a,,,,, rr��� � co*orr:to v,.,,....o,,,� � v.,,.o �^t . � � � C C _.� `' • � 0 � � 0 0 0 0 0 o v� o � o MN N �-+ � �'a 1 � � f O M � • � � b��0 � O � � � _ '~ �,} O N '�'_- � � �� �'�?; � + �h��;�./� �:W:S�1•Ll ; }'+'i,'+•�'P� M.?:t;A ��� . fL� yFtii:::>.j; �'�'+:�:i. � $�/. ��.'�v�{i� �:��� pv. � /{'#if 4,'� '�y�• :w �� � N}� � .S�{ k ��, ��� µ{v>%,,•�fn,'}�•�i•� ! . 2..:.'Y•:?:�•`.+'n:}jyy� 1 • �� �� 0 • . � O'1 � � O . 4� � �--°� .� � O � � O� ' � � h O �'.;�. N � , � o a o 0 0o v� � ,.. , �,� � 0 0�0 � � � , � , � 0 0 0 0 00 �p .-� , ��. • �.�f 0 . O o�0 t�D � � �bA .� � cs3 � O � �1 � .o � cd w � � > � o � > 0 , • . � 0 0 � a o � � �. r \ G7 00 �p ,•-� � � � C!S � O "C3 N � � W � � � r� � O � ..✓ � � f ; . �.� � �■r �. 0 r � O O • O O o0 �D � .� � an .� x cd ' O '� !�". N � y :� O c� � W � � > � O �, � � > O � , � +V�.,.Sr :9.t'.44; c� y't��;.,; �. �k fk£:y .•,;,:,,i y: v:p;s i'7;'?;� s:;� � � i4 � ~ � P .} .t2i�'t �"$� .�X:�2.''�'. . }.,•. .,�'.�� . . :.•:.'Y:^.•J. . ;,;y.M,,, ! �:`�`��:`v��;; � 0 0 � 0 00 = .� '�an .� � 0 b a�i � o W � a� � � > � O �, � � > O �-.�:—�� �.• `•-•,••J/�/%%�I�/��r ►r�3 r t °r r � ' � '' y , `� � �.'„�.—� �: / �.�l�.i i/�% �1. � � t ��. r ! ! r��� Z i. /I////�/ii... � � ����' , �� �.� �: .,� i �/ �1' � : .. f J ! . . 1 j i ,►�' i �' j! �"i�i �k ' I � '�,�, � 1 f t �t �I i. �`� ` , /' �,,I� �,t 11� - a _ � �� ����I�'�S� ��� �\,�%/1��'/It��t�� �\��i� � �►�j«.�� j�%�/I,'�i�,���\ �,\ 1 \ � ������%j�����s�'�,\,,d,���i;��;� � ���''�I1� ',,//�i/(l�\\,J\�\,`',`, . ��► �% �. I.►� `'.i� \' � \�� � 'i�� —� "� .I/ �.�>-. � . ��� � �I �\` ' e —'"�►!„+`�-i�_ l��i :��/��11�i�������4w � F S 1 � /�,►.,-+-. -�►!'� rI.'��n. i �r ��+v + � ,, i � t P �� . ,,�`.'—�!!���:'���i��' '���I/Nl� ;� y . t+� - �" a�_. �� cy,: ���►'�'+'�� >�i-i�.I�/ �I�r ��/�/ � j � � � J�;. �. :; �i„��,�t��►.� �; �..� i/I irr �nJ ,! 4. . , t . � j :�..-►i �/�/!►,�"�j% �- . � i �. �"a�" � � =//1/r ,�r/ �h .y'j �i�� ���I�.►��i� � //� e� . a —�►I.►►�% . . ' - ✓"i �'� � 4 �, , _...I ii�..�{ . � . _ ., ... %/ ►\ ��i�,y� � i �(i;. � z t` �; ''�'!� ��l � i ,. '"" : iir_.,,� �" �.• � � t �� ��j�,. i.�- / ..." j� � %l �!/''% 'i� �i��:' r ..+. .. � \ , � .� /+�•N� � �. t � . . rI .�. r �- . ' :~ S �\ -�,�1. i. =�"c-r fi' � fr�., � : � r � t . � ..17. � � �'4 r . i --�' -'- r s: � , ��v 1`�. r�' . N� f �i iji t� � V 4��� �/ i! � i^ , f`.r,,. . a�, + > 1 t �}t���L�t 1 6 ��,e: i •i ;� 1� � .� J�, �/i � M� ��✓�,��; y�`l 11 � \l��,-�,. � .r ," � � ' ,� / t � f'i. . :'f' . . 'R �.. °- L 4 6 �, 1 f .��•` t�fl\�i � � � ,y ��.. r : `- � ' r �. j � • r �r � �� 9� 3 i �I � �t t- 2< �� : . ' . ✓'� � r - � + ��" �r� -�%�.- , r_ �.. i i _�� . � � � i� ;t q i }: � `. . . . ._.. . _, .... _ . ,.._ , � .. . . lj�� . ...�y:.... 'i1�Ietropolitan Airports Comiuission � 1 Proposecl North Boundary Corridor Gate �.'enetration Analysis M�nneapolis - St. Paul International Airpoi-t June 1996 (. 0.6 %(31) Carrier Jet Departures North of Proposed 095° (M) : Corridor Polzcy Boundary Three days of ARTS data missing. C Page 2 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Metropolitan Airports'Lommission Mimneapolis - St. Paul International Airpori . June 1996 47i6 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures 25 ... Carrier Jet I)epartures 0.5%) North of Proposed 095° (1VI) Corrid.or I'olicy �ound.ary � 25 TRACKS GROSSED P-GATE LEFT CO�NT=16 (64.0�) RIGHT COl1NT=9 (36.��) �.r -6i DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Three days of ARTS data missing. Aviakion Noise & Satellite Pro�rams � Pa�e � Metro olitan �--. A Airports Commission Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airpori June 1996 4776 ... Total 11I, and 11�Z Carrier Jet Departures 6... Carrier Jet Departure - Eaa~ly Turnout (0.1 %) (North Side Before Three Miles) 6 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE �, LEF1 COUNT=S (83,3�) RIGNT COUNT=1 (16.7�) a �� � -6 DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) "lhree days of ARTS data missing. Page 4 Aviakion Noise & Satellite Programs 0 � � � y �� � �..,�!► � `; � �: 4 ';'�: i1 ,�,� � ;:' �,'� . . lVletropolitan Airports Commission w 0 � t— � ¢ �� �... �� m '• �1 �. ' . i . ' 11 ��� 4776 ... Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures 613 ... Carrier Jet Departures 12.8%) South of Corridor (South of 29L Localizer) 613 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE LEFT COUNT=596 (97.2�) RIGNT COUNT=11 (2.8�) ; ; � , , -----------------; � � T----------------------------------------------------- ; -----------------� r---'----"----" � � � i i ' ' � � � '-"----'--"" ,.-"---"----'-"''---"----"---"-'--"---"----"---�"---"-----'----`----'----'---"' -- • i � i i e i � • i • � i � � i• � � � � , , , ------------ a� � --- ' s i -s----------�--�--------------�------- � -- ---------� --"------ ---- --� y� � � �----------------- • � • �� � � � ��• • I � I� y� '� • �� � �• • • ° s � •° � • i e � , � � � � � � �' T� • �s � • ' . � ' � ' � $� � •�e , es � � � e '------------ ' i - --oe---�I-.r----------�-°�------------------i------------------�----------------- � � •• ; ,` � � e � • � � �g e� °� ; ; ° � •�j°° ess y e i s s i� •~'` , � � s � •� ��OMy� , ' • ' ' � � , . � � t """'_""'_y'�__'� _ � � � -----------�-----------------�------------------; ----------------�----------------- ' ' ' � i � � i � i � """"'_""" i � � i r"""""_""'_�""_"""""_'�"""'_"'"'_"'J � . . . � . r"""'_""'_"'r_""_"___'""__' t i � � i i � � ' i -40Q0 -2000 0 2000 40 DEVIATION FROM Three days of ARTS data missing. Page 6 CENTER OF GATE (ft Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � � C � Mehropolitan Airports Comm.ission Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport June 1996 �= � � 4776 ..e Tota111L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures 4S ... Carrier Jet Departures - Early �.rnout (1.0% (South Side Before Three Il�Iiles) 48 TRACKS CR05SED P-GATE LEFT COUNT=33 (68.8�) RIGHT COUNT=15 (31.2�) �.� � DEUTATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Three days of ARTS data missing. :i•� Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs p�e � %Ietropolitan Airports Comniission 1 ' i 1 1 . 1i 1 � , . � � � � , � • , ' � �'i � . ' . 1: . ' 1 � 3.8% (182) �arrier Jet Departures 5° South of Corridor (5° South of 29L Localizer) Three days of ARTS data missing. Page 8 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs C � C Metropolitan .Airports Commission Minneapolis - Sto Paul Imternational Airport June 1996 4776 ... Tota111L and.11R Carrier Jet Departures 134 ..a Carrier Jet Departures (2.8%) S° South of Corridor (5° South of 29L Localizer) 134 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE �, LEFT COUNT=122 (91.0�) RIGNT COUNT=12 (9.0�) � � C C C � �-'--� C �+— C „""'" C � w � � I— � � C J C �"i rr' �� O 4 N O O O -61 _ ' � i > ; , , , , � � � � , , , , ---------- ------- � � � � .T___'_____________T___'___________._,` '������_�_'�__�� �_���_�_�_'��__���_� � � ' r"'---'-`-'---"' > � � i ; ; i , i i � � � � � � � � � """"""""_' """"""'.. f"' � _ _""""""' _' _ �"""" , --"---'---�---'---'--"--"-� � � , �'---'---"--"'-- e� ' � � � � • i�e •o e� o• • • � � � e � •� � • � i � � • • e � ' i � � • � • � � a , o , � � e ee , vo � � -----------------5� d ---4- o-� -�-------� �-------�---------------- � ' •i"' � � ' �"'_"""""""' ' M�.O • ' t """""""" �.1 � i 'T � • `i � � � iw o '� � � � � i '-d�~ O i � e •i �� • ! • ti 0 •i � � � � � � i ' � � � � � "--'---"--"---; -'---"'--"--"-'---------"--"--''--'--' � � "'"'__'�_"'_'_" � """'"' � � � � i � � '""""""'_"" i i T_________________�_________________� � � _""_"""""' "1 � r-"--'---"---'-'' -"---'---"--"- � i i t -4000 -2 r�l�� � �!� r� � DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GRTE (ft) Three days of ARTS data missing. Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Pa�e 9 ivletropolitan Airports Commission �_ O O n r�-� � W a d d � O i— �v � J Q ' 4 O O � � •. 1 1 �., • . i . ' 1 � . ��y 4776 ... Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures 48 ... Carrier Jet Departures - Early Turnout (1.0%) . (South Side Before Three IVliles) 48 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE LEFT COIINT=33 (68.8%) RIGHT COUNT=15 (31.2�) , + s ; ; ' • • s � ♦ • � s • � � i ' ' m � � � � "__'_'.`_______'_y___'..'_i___E._____"_______4'-___j____'.'________________ �__i_____"._______'________'_' • s e� • s • � e s e � , a � i • s ' � • s � � � � � � � ' •• � s � ; • _ • • • • � , , '--------------------------� •---'---- � . r-------'-'----------'----i----- -------- i� ' _ _' _ r""_' _""""'""" _'""' • i ' i ""' _""' _ _"'""'_"_'."'"' _"_ _ _"""_"""' _ _ y""' _"""' _"' i i � � 5000 DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Three days of ARTS data missing. Page 10 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs . ,. Q C ' ` c. ""a' o„o"a"' o„' o' e, e e"'t„�„""'v o"e o't, o""' o' �"� t"' o n a", t„' � JULY 1996 �I, -.-.--- --- � l M� , • �:�,� :: :. ISSUE 31 QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS (end of June 1996) . . ,,-�!"( :�::, "''"'' '� PROJECT STEPS Comdeted Acrntlsltbns Canpleted Rebcffibns Vaceted PropeAlea Houses Movetl Narses Oe�raBshed NUMBER OF HOUSES 8 DUPLIXES 0 50 10D_150 200 250 300 350 I,--�- - — ����l�'�����!!'�'�N����M�'�����''���'�������'���M,9'���'l��'�l�����������������I SIXTH AUCTICDl�1 CONDUCTED MAC, WDSCO, and Kloster Industrial Auctioneers conducted the sixth pnblic auction on Thursday, June 27, 1996, at 1:30 p.m. Out of twenty-seven (27) houses available for suction, all were sold. The highest bid for a home this auction was $30,500, which was also the highest dollar amount realized for any suction home to date. The lowest bid was 5400, with an average price celculation of $8,181.48 for ali homes purohases at this sixth auction. The chart betow reflects the success of each suction, with funds generated in excess of one million ¢bllms finm all six aucrions to go back into funding for the Part 150 Land Acquisition and Relocation Program. � � � ' '�' �- - - Veit, the contractor for the first round of demolition, has now completed seeding all remaining demolition sites. This finai seeding process wiii conclude Viet's contract WOI'�C. Wickeahauser, Inc. the cnnrent demolirion contractor, is compledng preparation for the demoli6on of seven (7) buildings in New Ford Town snd one (1) buIlding in Rich Acres. Ali eight (8) of these buildings were unable to be auctioned, Werefore, completing the demolition process on each of these buildings will save the project costiy fees in pmperty management associated with daily maintenance. Fow (4) out of the eight (8) buildings scheduled to be demolished, did contain asbestos. Envimbate, the asbestos abatement contractor, completed the necessary abatement work the second week of July. The eagineer inspected the contracwrs work for safety purposes and approved the buildings for demolition. The demolidon work on these eight (8) buildings is expected to be completed by the end of lu1y. The next demolition work will be determined once the next group of six (6) or more buildings have been assembled and prepared for demoli6on. MAC and WDSCO will inform all homeowners and tenants prior to any additional demolidon acdvities being performed. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT UPDATE Dumaster Policv/Site: The new dumpster policy is working weil for the homeowners and tenants, while enabling us to ensure that exclusive use of the dumpsters 'is by current neighborhood residents. Dumpsters will be available on the following days: � lst 8c 3rd Saturdays every month from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 am. Every Tuesday from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Every Thursday from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. If you need to use the dumpster, please call WDSCO to schedule aa appointment during one of these timefi�nes. The Part 150 Buyout Update is a news{etter by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and W.D. Schock Company, Inc., containing information on the MSP Land Acquisition and Relocarion Proj ects. � MAC Police and FBI Training• Once again the MAC Potice and the FBi utilized a vacant house for training exercises. The o8icets trained from early � morning to mid-afternoon, conducting a number of training scenarios in and amund the assigned house, nHlizing the streets, trees, and other ameairies. This is the second time We officers have used a vacant house within the neighborhood for Wis purpose. The training exencisea have bcen snccessful for the officers, and many precautions were taken not to disturb any of the resideats or cause pmblems of any kind. The sssigned training dwellings are ael� onty if the pmperty is located well away fmm the other honses currcntly occnpied. The officere are vcry appncia6ve of this opportnnity and fcel that this opgortunity is an asset to them and the community. Other training sessions may be pianned for future dates. Pronertv ManaQement Comnanv Moves to New Buitdmg• Pham E�teas, Inc., our pmperty management company, will be moving fmm their cuirent location in the neighborhood to a new site at 6531 21st Avenne South. This move ia based on the desu�e to suction We buiiding �*��Y ��8 utilized by Pham Express, as well as relocate the property management aervicea to a moc�e central iocation. The presence of Pham Express at the new location will aiso provide additional security to We neighborhood. PHASE IV: A�QUdSITION AND REL(DCATION A.�►r�rAis�1 U��p+te• As of Jnly 25, 1996, sixty-three (63) appraisals have been ordercd for Phase N. Lyle Nagell Company, We MAC ePPraisel fimn, has aimost completed all field appraisals for Phase N,and is continuing to work on the written appraisal reports. WDSCO hes received thirty-one (31) completed appraisal reports from Lyle Nageli, and to date, twenty.three (23) review appraisats have been ordered and received back. Of%r Uudate• Aa of July 25, 1996, the offer process for those homeowners in phase N is 17°/a complete. Eleven (11) " W.D. SCHOCI{ COMPANY, INC. /� ss4a zsTx AVErruE souTx MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417 (612)724-8898 (S00)260-�062 offer meetings have been held, with seven (7) homeowners accepting their offers. Depending on �� the individual needs of each homeowner, any or all : of the sixty day time frame may be utilized to accept the,�yri�ten offer. Once the written offer has been accepted by the homeowner, WDSCO will schedule the acquisition closing date to take place� ' . within thirty (30) days. Acauisition Ctosine Uodate• As of JWy 25, 1996, there have been two (2) acquisition closings conducted for those homeowners in Phase N. The acquisi6on closing process for this Phase is 3% compieted. ILelocation Closin_� Utn�la4e• As of this July Buyout Ugdate, one (1) Phase N homeowner has closed on their relocation home. The Phase N r�elocation ciosing pmcass is now 2% completed. As of luly 25, 1996, one (1) Phase N Pmperty has been vacated. The Phase N vacating pmcess is now 2% compteted. BUYOUT FEEDBACK Q. Can I sign a purchase agreement on my new zeplacement home prior to WD$CO presenting me with a written offer to acquire my existing home? ' A WDSCO continues to stress to each homeowner the importance of waiting until their written offer has � been presenbed, before signing a purchese agreement on a nplaaement home. Untii the written of%c, the eacact dollar amount the homeowner wili have to ! 3PFjY �Na:d a new ho�e u711 not b� 3et..:.,.iucd (bssed on the acquisition and relocaHon benefit package). Atso, a definite timeframe for the � acquisidon closing or a possible relocation ciosing � date cannot be determined until the off'er meeting. Every effort wiil be made by WDSCO to accommodate esch homeowners needs on a case by case basis. Please be aware that certain timefi�mes are necessary for WDSCO snd MAC to follow. If, as a homeowner, yau make the decision ta sign a purohase agreement and set a closing date prior to your written offer, WDSCO cannot gumsntee funds will be availabie by your relocarion closing date. ��.AA:�.;�?�u;;' ;�=•'� _:_::' � ? o`""" `�!����.I�J�if':�J� � S tr• i :�';� i< �. cn;_'r,x) _ ���I; [n y^:l;�� � \� f VJ . �'ti'Ni SV83<!__.._..__....+IR Tom Lawell 1101 Victaria �n,e Mendota Hghts, NiN 55118 �� SOUTH METitO AIRPORT ACTION COUNCIL iiUGUST 1996 Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton of Minneapolis has adopted many of South Metro Airport Action Council's recommendations for noise abatement in her role as Minneapolis' key�,delegate to the new MAC Noise Mitiga�ion Conunittee. The Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) committce was formed by the 1996 Minnesota Legislature to work out ways to invest at least $185 million in noise mitigation steps. It consists of the mayors of the eight communities -��urounding the Minneapolis- i �Paul (MSP) airport, plus four NIAC Commissioners, two Metropolitan Council members, one representative from the Metro Are� Saund Abatement Council (MA�AC) and one representative from Northwest Airlines. Each of the mayors presented his or her basic positions on noise relief in the first four sessions. A public hearing on their preliminary recommendations is set for Aug. 29. The full MAC board is to vote Sept. 16 on final recommendations for the next legislative session. Sayles Belton specifically proposed the following ideas: (1) No third parallel runway; (2) Increased use of the newly expanded 4/22 crosswind runway to lessen trai�ic over Minneapolis � from the two parallel runways; � � (3) More data on the ground noise effects of a proposed nort.h- south runway, and the budgeting of all mitigation costs at both ends of the runwa.y as projects costs; (4) Cease alt Stage 2 aircraft fli,ghts between 10 p.m. and 6 am; (5) Monitor and enforce national legislation mandating airline fleet conversion to all Stage 3 by 2000; (6) Until then, require airlines to use the same percentage of Stage 3 aircraft at MSP as they do at other airports; at present, Northwest, the largest carrier here, uses more Stage 2 (specifically DC-9's) here than elsewhere; (7) Ensure that operational requirements, such as the three-mile corridor for departures over Eagan/Mendota Heights, are noise- reducing measures, not simply rneasures that increase noise in other areas; (8) Use actual current sound data recorded by the Airport Noise and Operating Monitoring System (ANOMS) instead of computer- generated data whenever possible to analyze noise effects; (9) Encourage the MAC and other aviation organizations to prornote the development of Stage 4 aircraft; (10) Extend the home insulation program to Ldn 60 contour, but only after completing the present Part 150 program (covering some 4,000 remaining homes by 2000, all in Miuuieapolis); (11) Insulate Ldn 60 homes at the same rate in each community, ra.ther than one community at a time, as was the Part 150 practice; (12) Notify homeowners of the planned insulation schedule for the remaining four years of the Part 150 program; use only quality contractors and materials; create several ombudsmen, funded by the program but responsible to the homeowners, to resolve disputes; (13) Expand eligibility for insulation to multi-fanuily dwellings, churches, nursing homes, commercial and recreational buildings; (14) Institute a system of properly value guarantees to encourage occupants to stay and invest in their hornes; (15) Provide some form of tax abatement to compensate homeownersfor the loss of tranquillity; (16) Increase amenities such as. decorative street lighting, recreational facilities, athletic programs, reforestatioq etc. to strengthen neighborhood appeal; (17) Study the long-term health effects of exposure to aircraft noise; (18) Update MACs emergency/disaster plan. As to financing, Sayles Belton urged that the state shoulder some of the responsibility for mitigation "as the airport is a benefit to the entire state." She suggested the MAC and the state create a trust fund from higher landing fees or a percentage of annuai capital expenditures to finance the next round of mitigation needs. Observers are concerned that because the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is restricted by federal law to fund home insulation programs only in the 65 Ldn zone or lugher, the rule would have to be changed or new funding sources found to qualify 60 Ldn homes. Of the $185 million floor ' mandated by the Legislature, an- estimated $135 million has already be�n budgeted by MAC for home insulation and buy-outs through 2000. Thus, at least $40 million in "new" money is nceded to rneet the legislature's floor. Neighborhood organizations, churches and elected officials were invited by SMAAC to a meeting on July 31, at Mt.. Zion Lutheran Church on 57th and Chicago Ave. S, to participate in joint decision- making on airport issues. Included are the following: Nokomis East, Standish-Ericsson, Hale-Page-Diamond Lake, Windom, Armatage, Kenny, Pershing, Linden Hills, West Calhoun, Fulton, Tangletown, Lynnhurst, E. Harriet Faimstead, Field-Regina Northrup and Kingfield. Churches invited include Ma.yflower Cangregational, Mount Zion Lutheran, Diamond Lake Lutheraa, Bethel Assemblies of God, Edgevvater Baptist, Edgewater Emmanuel, First Evangelical Free, Nokomis Heights Lutheran, Our Lady of Peace Catholic and Richfield Lutheran. Elected officials include all south Minneapolis City Councit members, south Muuieapolis state legislators and two Hennepin County comrnissioners, plus two appointed MAC commissioners. S14���C N�1�SL�E'fT�i� SMAAC is working with some 15 neighborhood associations, 10 religious institutions, and 20 elected officials to create a coalition of or�;anizations representing a broad spectnun of south Minneapolis residents. The purpose of the newly founded South Minneapolis Airport Noise Mitigation Coalition (SMANIVIC) is to advocate long-range solutions to airport issues affecting our neighborhoods. With the new state law keeping the Minneagolis- St.Paul Metropolitan Airport (MSP) at its present site for the foreseeable future, our role will be to recommend noise mitigation strategies that will retain and improve our quality of life. SMANMC has been formed now for two reasons. Firstly, the community needs to be a part of the decision-making process regarding new noise mitigation strategies. Our health, homes, property values, schools and churches are at stake as well as the quality of our environment. We want to make sure new dollars are distributed fairly. Secondly, we need to be united to fight the potential expansion of the airport at its present site. SMAAC, acting as the temporary steering committee, sees this coalition as critical to fighting future issues from a broad community base. As part of the recent legislation, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) has created a Noise Mitigation Committee comprised of mayors of affected commututies including Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, Eagan, Mendota Heights, St. Paul, Burnsville and Inver Grove Heights. 'fhis committee's purpose is to make recommendations to MAC about the allocation of funds,- While airplane noise is not C distributed evenly over the - communities represented on this committee, representation has been assigned one vote per community rather than proportionally to the number of homes or people affected. It is this fact that especially is of concern to Sh��1NMC and SMAAC — South Minneapolis receives some 87% of the noise generated by the airport and thus we feel the majority of the money spent on noise mitigation should be in south Minneapolis. SMAAC presented a preliminary list af recommendations to Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton ut late June. It is our belief that our recommendations need to be represented strongly at the MAC comrniitee and that without strong representa.tion we will not see sufficient dollars to address our concerns. To be heard on noise mitigation � issues, contact your City Council � and State representatives, or attend the second round of public input meetings with Sayles Belton at: Roosevelt High School at � p.m. Aug. �, or at Diamond Lake Lutheran Church, 5�60 Portland Ave. at 7 p.m. Aug. 12. To find out more about SMANMC, call at 861-1061. Public ire over airline monopoly pricing tactics spilled over into legislative chambers June 14 when four Senate committees met to explore the reasons for and impact of such pric'vng on the state's economy. ��- . .. Af�r some four hours of questioning of an airline industry ' ,onomist, Metropolitan Airports .'onunission staff, Northwest Airlines executives and two business leaders, no clear answers arose nor any solutions proposed. At issue was a recent study by Prof. Severin Borenstein of the University of Califor,nia-Davis showing that airline prices at Niinne,apolis-St. Paul airport were the fowth highest among the busiest 30 hub cities in the U.S. They ran 32 percent above the national average for same-distance trips in 1995. 4., R.anking ahead of MSP were Charlotte (56 percent higher), Cincinnati (54 percent) and Pittsburgh (39 percent). The lowest fare dif�ere�ntials were found at Oakland (35 percent), Honolulu (-26 percent), Phoenix (-24 percent) and San Diego (-23 percent). ,._ ���g only at the prices of the ` _ ,argest carrier at one auport, gorenstein found that Northwest Airlines' prices at MSP "are in the same range as those of dominant a�lines at some other large airports: American at Dallas/Fort Worth, US Air at Pittsburgh and De��aa at Adanta. But they were below US Air at Charlotte and Delta at Cincinnati." Meanwhile, the largest airlines at some other hubs — Baltimore, Chicago, Denver, Houston, Salt Lake City and St. Louis — charge prices much closer to the national average. ""Though these prices do not ttecessarily indicate that there is a lack of competition at MSP that results in prices well above cost, Borenstein said, `that inference deserves serious attention. The U. S. Departments of Justice and Transportation have explicitly recognized this hub dominance effect." Northwest controls about ( )80 percent of the MSP market. S1K��C N��YSL�TT��t "I believe frequent-flyer programs, travel agent commission ovemde programs, share-based corporate discount programs and limited gate availability are among the major causes of this hub dominance effect. These factors make it very difficult for new entrants to cornpete with a dominant incumbent. � "At hubs where competitocs have managed to gain a faothold, prices have generally fallen and consumers have benefited. I arn not in a position to evaluate all of the costs and benefits, but if gate availability has impeded competitive entry, expansion is a 1ogical step to consider as part of an attempt to mcr�ease corngetition and lower MSP airfares," Borenstein declared. Northwest contended that higher fares are the result of several factors: a higher percentage of business versus towrist traffic,lugh quality service, and the cost of maintaining and servicing a diversified fleet of aircraft types (Boeing, McDonnell Douglas and Airbus) for intecnatiional routes. Both Northwest and MAC oi�icials denied there is a lack of gate space at MSP. MAC said it has been unsuccessful in attracting a major discount carrier (such as Southwest Airlines), but Vanguard and Frontier have begun limited service in the past yeac' to Denver, Chicago, Kansas City and St. Louis. Observers noted that Sun Country Airlines, a Minneapolis- based unscheduled line, has begun advertising rnore heavily lately and that Northwest has countered in a few markets. One fact became clear: airline prices are set by competitors' rates, not by costs. One corporate travel manager, Gloria Carlson of H. B. Fuller Co., noted wide disparities in ticket prices per mile traveled, depending on the competitiveness of the route. She said list prices were prohibitive and that more companies are turning to videa conferencing to reduce travel costs. Carlson added that she'd beea told "there are no extra gates available at MSP" and that Northwest takes 90 minutes to iurn around a plane, versus 45-60 minutes for other carriers. "Dces Northwest use these gates to a maximum, or could a reasonable compromise provide extra gat,es for others?," she asked. (Northwest has consistently said it dces and will lease extra gat�es to competitors when asked, and that it provides gate maintenance services TABl.E � PRICES OF WtGEST AIRUNE AT U.S. HUB AIRPORTS COMPARED TO NATIONAL AVEFtAGE PRICES FOR SAME-DISTANCE TRIPS,1984-is95 a S1�Y�ihC P�t��lftSL�ETT��. .. to smaller airlrries at several airports as a source of revenue.) MSP has 69 gates, and is considering the addition of 15 gates over the next 20 years under its modest growth scenario. Irving Stem, chaicman of a voluntary association of MSP carriers, air freight shippers and other industry intec+ests called GADA, contended that MSP should continue to press for more international flights as a way to �iirrake this hub more attra:ctive to other domestic carriers. He credited NiAC for helping increase MSP's weekly international flights from 60 to nearly 200 over the past year, but noted, "it isn't easy, and it dcesdt always work." Icelandic Airways attempted to schedule service here, but coulddt reach agreement with Northwest on a wholesale passenger relationship, and went to Boston u�stead, accarding to NWA. If the MAC is required by the new state law to fund noise insulation for all of the homes in the 1996 60 LDN wne (see map), the bill could exceeci $200 million, according to a SMAAC estimate. That's based on a conservative guess that 410 residential blocks with roughty 8,200 homes in south Minneapolis, Richfield and Bloomington alone fall into the expanded noise eligibility zone. At a limit of $25,000 per home, the tab tops $205 million. And there are an uncounted number of homes in the less populated sections of Mendota Heights, Inver Grove Heights, Burnsville and Eagan to � be considered. Since an estima.ted $140 million of the $185 rnillion minimum mandated by the legislature is commit�ed to finishing the present home insulation program by 2000, and since the FAA doesn't presently fund any residential properties outside the 65 LDN wne, the MAC Noise Mitigation Committee and legislature have a challenge to find adequate sources. The current Part 150 program is insulating 1,200 homes a year at the rate of $20 million a year, all in Minneapolis, since other suburbs have been completed. If run at the same rate, the 60 LDN wne work would take about seven years. � � C 4 � ��.�,-��.:: .::.;:.;.: ; } :...:........;:..��::.;�::::::::;:::::::.:.:<:�:�::>::�:>;:r::.::.. .,:•: � `x.� •.«..r:.;.::•,::;:::,:>.:::<:::;:::>::::.:;.::.;..:,::: . ..,.....:...}..;,,.., '#xi.. : �. . "''s:>::>•:'•::::'::..:: �,� •:�:':<,: �y�.y ij�jj��c��.y���}; : -,;:::<,:;;;;:;';;.;:i ''k>�;``•T:.t�::>;�`r tt r��iG;f1;I,.�':7t;.;q„H7;:;R7�;�F:;:���::i`;;:,w';:.:t•'.;::•:•:: }::: � �,�.,^ : •.. ..�;.•., t;>.� �' The shortage of parking spaces in the rnain parking ramp has forced MAC to improvise an additional 1,000 spots by converting the paesent eanployee parking lot near the Humphrey Ternunal to public use for about $1 million. 'The s aces are to be read in Au or � p Y September. Meaciwhile, however, the plan to add 1,200 pern�anent spaces on the east end of the present multi-story ramp for $25 million may have to be scaled up draitiatically because of sharply increased demand this spring and summer. There's talk now of having to add up to S,OO�J more spaces for upwards of $140 rnillion (worst case) over the next five years. Stay tuned. The new MSP federal inspection center, providing customs and clearance services for the five new t�� lternational gates on the Gold -�oncourse, is due to open m December. FAA certification of the new Global Positioning System (GPS) is e in Se tember, not June. XP� P Test fli ts b commercial aircraft •. S� Y are to start shortly thereafter. Sun Country and Northwest are showing more interest than three months ago. The satellite navigation aid is supposed to allow more accurate landings and ultimately wider noise dispersion. Passenger traffic at MSP rose 9,2% to 8.97 million passengers in the first four months of 1996 froan 8.22 million in the same period a year earlier, according to figures released July 19, 1996 by the '4iAC. t ) SM�� C N�IA!'SL�ET'd'�� The number of fli ts, both inbound and outbo�und, jumped 6.1 percent to 147, 893 from 139,366 in the first four months of 1995, with April posting a 14 percent gain. Charter flights increased 35 percent; major camers were up 8.7 percent, general aviation climbed 7.4 percent and air &eight 0.76 percent. Regional operations decreased 2 percent and military flights dropped 18.1 percent. Among the major carriers, Northwest Airlines increased its MSP market share to 82.4 percent during April. United was in second place at 4.1 percent, followed by American at 3.25 percent, TWA at 2.24 percent, Delta at 2.15 percent, US Air at 1.19 percent, Continental 1.18 percent, KLM at .57 percent and Air Canada .25 percent. Among the discount airlines, America West was the leader with 1.28 percent of the commercial market. Vanguard held .7� percent, Frontier .38 percent and Pacific Intercontinenta1.21 percent. 'The discount carriers held a measly 2.64 percent of the total MSP market. �:: ,�:.�:>::;.::.;:.:>::::.r v;:>:.;:<.;:.;::;:::;�:>::>:;:<.::.:;::;.;::::::::;.;,:>,,:::: ::::.:�::::::...... .:.>::.:�:::::::::::.;:., .::.:.:.::.::::.:..::�::.�:.� .::. :,::.:.:.;�<::.;�:::::„.....,,.: �... ...:...... ::>::,:<:.... �: ��:�::��:�`���. �<:�::::<:`v�:€>:<:< ::�;�?k:�:�;<�:�(:.::... .::..........:: :::.........�......�..::...:::,:.v.::. ............ :::..:...... ::::.:.;.:::. :...:.,..:�:::...: �..�:,.,:.:.:;:.:.. .::::::<; .. ....::... .:::::,: :..:.. . ``<;:`'::�:�£: � �::����.�::�>:<:::::::>:::: �:`�;�;_::;:;' �::�� :�.>�:::. :>:;::x«.:>::»::::� .<.;;,:r:.;::::;><:»,:;::::;:>:::<<:>::: The 10 percent airline ticket tax and an air cargo waybill ta�c generate about $5 billion a year to fund the FAA's air traffic control system, airport improvements and the FAA budget. 'The taxes havedt bcen collected since Jan. l, 1996, when President Clinton vetoed a series of broad spending bills that included an extension of these levies. As a result, the trust fund is seriously depleteci and could run out of cash by next January. However, Congress is expected to rea.ch an agreement in August to either reinstate the excise tax or set up a new user fee system, which is backed by the seven major airlines. The big carriers argue that the excise tax gives an unfair pricing advantage to low-cost airlines. They have proposed a user fee of $2 per airplane seat ($1 for commuter planes), $4.50 per passenger and 1/2 centper passenger mite travele�. -��, -- :::�<:;:::::::<:: � ::> ::;:;,;:::::v;:::::,:;:: :::.:f:::.:::��:::.;. .,r�� ;�. : .`..<�€<:�::>:'>>; "<r��+:>:3�`� :>:�:.i�;:����'� .... :.:::: .::::: .....:: .: .::: ........ � `�:.�: •: � :.: :.::.:::::.::.::.:: :::::.::: ::::.:..:::: .: : ::: :.: :.: : : :.::.: :.: ::: r:: � : ::.::.:;:;: : : :: � The Metropolitan Airports Commission had a record year in 1995, with opera.ting revenues, net income, passenger tnps and flights all exc.ceding any previous year. 'fhe quasi-public body said operating revenues rose 10.9 percent to $87.2 million from $76.4 rnillion in 1994. Operating expenses increased 6.'7 percent to $74.9 million frorn $70.2 million a year earlier. Operating income -climbed 98.4 percent to $12.3 million from $6.2 million last year. In addition, the MAC booked $44.9 million in interest income compased with $41.8 million a year ago, and received $32.3 million in passenger fac ili char es at $ 3 er ty g � P ' i ri in passenger) against $28.5 mill o 1994. So net income rose to $56.6 million from $42.9 million, a strong 32 percent gain. At year's end, retained earnings amounted to $409.1 million, up from $345.9 million a year earlier. Passenger trai�ic at MSP increased 9.7 percent to 25.3 million in 1995 from 23.1 million in 1994. The nurnber of arriving and departing planes increased 2.7 percent to an adjusted 415,685 in 1995 from an adjusted 404,723 a year earlier, after deducting an estimated 50,000 general aviation flights and overflights in each year. r_'__"' _"_'_'_"_"—_ i I . ; . . �. �,�. I 1 . Sio Cherges 8 Fees 535.3M . � � Rentals 1995 Operating Revenue: 587.2M Concessions (including parking, auto rental, food and beverage sales) were the main source of revenue again in 1995 at 4�.9 percent. Airline rates and charges (including landing fees, ramp fees, terminal rentals and noise surcharges) contributed 40.3 percent of revenues. Building rentals, lobby fees, u6lities and other fees made up the re�maining 11.8 percent. : :�....—�����:�.� .,;. a:.2..;;s,S::f.`:£�,'t`.',i`��]'<:tir$?3E':�irr.`•i�>'i:3i`�,,^._r:'t;::X.i�i.%,•:�i;:'t:�t2�#'•'r.:�; j,:>;: ti.�,�, . _>�:�..�::.;. .��r:�:��r;��{:�<�:::�'.��:h�<k- .;:::4`i::::::S�xoS:a`SS.:::�::;.<::n,`.�;r!`;i;:.';?;i:::::?{i¢,<c.t?:`S:r 1:^;k:i.4�:;<:::f��F; Detroit Metropolitan Airport announced plans Ma.y 20 to add 74 new gates — the equivalent of a new Minneapolis-St. Paul airport -- and a fourth para11e1 runway for $1.6 billion in the next three years. What dces this mean to Mianesotans? It all depends on your perspective. To the boosters of Minnesota's air transportation industry, including Gov. Carlson, the state legislature, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the state's construction, tourism and import- export industries, it must be a staggering blow. That's because Minrresota. probably has lost any chance of becoming Northwest Airlines' dominant internationat hub, and all the economic fallout that implies (see story next page). What's worse, NWA will in effect use some of the $800 million in loans and grants advanced by the state legislature and the MAC in 1992 to help finance the Detroit expansion. Yet, there's not been a word of public concern from either Democrats or Republicans in Minnesota over this stab in the back. Meanwhile, NWA and Michigan officials are beating their breasts over the anticipated economic shot in the arm. "Detroit has become Northwest's most important international launching pad in North America," said Don Washburn, an NWA executive vice president. "When our customers come to the U.S. frorn Europe, Japan, China, Mexico and Canada, most will arrive in Detroit." Said Robert Braun, director of Metro airport, "I really believe this opportunity could be as significant for the region's economy in the coming century as the auto industry was to the last century." � �' To the residents of noise-battered cornmunities surrounding MSP, it means both good and bad news. There won't be the noise of some 100,000 additional flights a year ruining their day 10 years hence, but there won't be as much need for a new airport anywhere in Minnesota in the next 20 years, with associated job opportunities. Observers are quick to point out that MSP probably never had much of a chance. Detroit Metro serves a population of more than 21 million compared with seven million in MSP's natural trade area.. Furthermore, the U.S. and Japanese auto industries are big customers of the Michigan airport. Finally, direct flights frorn Detroit to , Beijing are expected to relieve congestion in Tokyo and bypass the U.S. west coast Far East hubs beca.use of a more efficient route over the North Pole. Ironically, the news was released `z only weeks af�er NWA had lobbied the Minnesota. legislature for a minimal expansion plan here, and only weeks before an independent study found MSP operating costs to be up to 42 percent lower than competing airports. That built-in advantage didni seem to matter to cost-conscious NWA. FUNDING PLANS Funding for the $1.6-billion Detroit Metro expansion project will come from four sources, all airport- related: 1) $700 million from passenger facility charges (cunently $3 per passenger); `.. 2) $350 million in ternunal rental fees and other charges paid by G1Ct1eTS; 3) $27S rnillion in federal funds -�ost,ensibly the aviation trust fund); and 4)$225 million in concessions, parking and other traveler fees. The expansion will add 64 domestic � and 10 iaternational gates at the new mid-Seld tern�inal, with an option to add nine more domestic and two international gates by 2010. Six current internationai gates at an older ' terminal wilt be converted to regional and charter flight use. ` 'KL nf• M4 .MT' •'R�....'+5+�>N'hW.CY•nfM'b;:~+'.f::'r .. <.;� �� >.. . .: ;: ,�.��` :� � ��i� � • � r;xz�:r.c:.t. �.z�:�^..': � a;�:w: .�r . • .> •:. `�• , � � vr , � ,; . . ���� �i;�, � . �; . .. .: � ��� ...�. . ...... . '. : '� . .. . .. .. . . .. .��� ::.` :�>�:.>:.::::. The economic loss to Minne.sota, &om Nordiwest Airlines' decision to locate its China gaieway in Detroit rather than Minneapolis-St. Paul will be substantial. Some examples: � ,�7) An estimated 20,000 pern�anern jobs, including ticket agents, baggage handlers, concession stand, security and m�i�ttenance personnel at the airport, plus an undetermined number of "second-wave" jobs in the cammunity; (Northwest alone employs about 3,000 people at Detroit Metro, out of a total airport staff of 15,000); 2) Construction wages, estimate� conservatively at $300 million for the new terminal, runway, a 5,000-car parking garage, new access road and renovations to three existing terniinals; 3) An estirnateti $50-$100 million a year in increased retail and lodging purchases; 4) Increased import and export cargo handling fees; ( j SM��C N�`�ISIe�T'r�IZ Internationai Passenger Traffic MSP vs Detroit 2.6 ` � 2 rn a�i N � 1.6 a w- � 9 � c 0 � 0.6 5) Additional gowth in foreign- owned businesses m Miclrigan; the total already has risen from 157 in 1982 to 916 in 1995; Miclugan will be no more than 14 hours a way from any foreign destination; and (6) Creafiion of a "China clearin,ghouse" at the airport, providing services for both Chinese and U. S. finns doing business in each othe�'s markets. - Meanwhile, Minnesota. struggles to build a vision for economic growth in world markets from a second- class vantage point. South Minneapolis residents who assumed the threat of a third parallel runway sa.fely was buried with the passage of the new airport law may have been premature. Within six weeks after the law's approval. MAC officials announced preliminary discussions were under way with the U.S. Bureau of Mines and Minnesota Departrnent of Natural Resources (DNR) for MAC to acquire 141 �890 �sss Year acres of the upper bluff area of Fort Snelling state park neac' Hwy. 55 and Hiawatha Ave. A MAC official assured the SMAAC Newsletter in late May that the land, if successfully acquired, would be used only to house a regional airline termuzal and auto rental centers. Later he told reporters the acquisition of the Fort Snelling property would delay or eliminate the nced for a$1.2 billion westside main passenger ternunal in 20 years. However, the parcel sits in a � position that forms the easternmost end of a hypothetical third parallel runway, long known to be the favored runway expansion site of Northwest Airlines and Richfield. The runway was dropped from the MAC's 2010 expansion plan in March. The law stipulates that no such runway can be built "without the affected city's approval." Minneapolis city officials initially reacted with a"bad faith" charge by MAC and said they were looking into the details. Still fresh in their memory was the MAC's use of the second parallel runway for commercial jets in the mid-1970s .� after promising the public it would be restricted to general aviation aircraft. Any transfer of the land as a result of a three-way swap between the DNR and the Bureau of Mines for additional park land is expected to require three to five years to negotiate. Four new directo�rs were elected to the board of SMAAC at the annual membership rneeting May 15 at Mayflower Community Church. The new board has since set priorities for the next six months. New board members are Greg Bastien (Nokomis East), Margaret Parsons (Hale), Dick Saunders (Diamond Lake), and A1 Wellnitz (Bloomington). Rcelected board members are Dean Lindberg (Nokomis East), Frank Ario (Diamond Lake), Eileen Scully (Hale), Charles Mamer (Nokomis) aad.Neil Clark (Kenny). Officers elected for the coming year are Sawnders , president; Lindberg, vice'president; Mamer, secretary; and Scully, treasurer. Priorities established for the next six months of 1996 by a new s�trategic planning committee, incorporating ideas suggested by the breakout groups at the annual meeting, include the following: (1) Preparing and submitting members' ideas for new noise mitigation measures to the MAC's new noise mitigation cornmittce and monitoring the process of deliberations with the mayors of the eight most affected communities; S1Vi��C N�ll{�"SL�ETT�EiZ (2) Creating stconger bonds with south Minneapolis neighborhood organizations concerned about long-term prospects for noise resolution; (3) Fighting any efforts by the MAC to acquire Fort Snelling land that might be utiliz.ed in time for a third parallel tunway; (4) Expanding SMAAC membership through a new marketing flyer, expanded quarterly newsletter and neighborhood summer festival participation; (5) Establishing clearer lines of responsibility between the board and SMAAC committces, with agrced-upon goals and budgets for each a.rea of activity. Any SMAAC member with a few hours to spare is encouraged to participate in this exciting new round of summer-fall programs. Particularly needed are your skills in cAalition-building, legislative relations, media relations, research, publications, graphic design, fund- raising, membership expanston or legal matters. Please call Saunders at 861-1061. SMAAC and at least one neighborhood organization, Hale- Page-Diamond Lake Community Organizarion, have urged the MAC to update -- and expand, if necessary -- the airport disaster management plan. Not clear in the present plan, the groups said, are the following seven issues: (1) The frequency of evaluation of mutual assistance agreements with the communities sunounding the airport; (2) The plan of action in the event of an off-airpart disaster in a rural setting; (3) The plan of action in the event of an off-airport disaster in a highly populateci urban setting, involving, for exainple, a s mall, office buildings, school, church, or densely populated residential area; (4) The plan for handling in excess of 500 casualties, including the interface with National Disaster Medical Systecns (NDMS). (Recent changes in health-care delivery systems have altered response potential), (5) The specifics of responses to multiple types of disasters, including hazardous chemicals, biological materials, radioactive .- materials and epidemics; (6) Plans for crisis intervention involving individuaLs and whole communities; (7) Plans for longer-term grief counseling and post-traumatic stress disorder management. A review meeting with MAC officials for a status report is planned in the near future. It was also urged that Minneapolis Mayor Sayles Belton take a leadership role in follow up. — -�<�........ � � ..........::::::::..... :.::::: .� � n�i'+ Y""^:''i:i:�:r:i:+i:�::�i:4:}:Su:�'riiiiii:ii::ii'i,::ii:ii:iy:::;:;'+•';:::]C'Y,.:+iiii:�ii:•:;i:L,:i: .}rJ ' •5�:::::?.ii:{:.uiii::}: •: :v..Y::n:: i"�: :::{:.:'�i:i:::?�:iiii:•:^:i i:a.+� . . ..: / . .. : U�v:. ..•,��.}'r..,�..>'•,: ; ::��;.G�r�:?:::� •� � �?�#":::C?t1�::`::�:�1's�;�y#aQM`::::;':::�:<::;:>:<�:;�•: w���:.•f>=:::�:::<.;:>;:::::>::>::�::::.;.:.;::.;�::..::::.;:.:�:•::�::::.>:;.;:.;:.;..::. � �.....::.,.:..:� .:::::..:..:::.::::::::::.::::..;.::.;::.::.:::.:::;:::..:::.::::::>::.>. How Can I Hetp? The number of airplanes flYing directly over my house at particularly annoying times has increased drarnaticallY sincs spsiaig. The most troublesome tirne is afier 10 p.m. Sundays, becanse I must get up at 5 or 6 a.m. to get to n►Y job on time. On several occasions, airplanes have rattled my windows after midiught. If I am watchinS the news, I can't hear what is being said. I don't see why they fly so low at 40th and,Cedac'. What can I do to support ar► airport goup? Please let me know. (From Marianna Stotesbury) Longfellow Ave., Minneapolis) ------ .�„�....—��..:.,..---....... �r < :,��: t� �� �:.::.; �"�'���.���:: s ��T���::�!.�.�:�'���: ��� `��:.:.. :<�;< +,�},�vx.. •,�Q}•�;r.:ti;Y:.^.`•+. `k•:i;}iriY?k::,C•:�':....:.;•�;i���K'�4''��:i{:< .�>.:. �,�:::.. `����� :�!'��� ,.�`;..;::.;•�:.:, �-}�,... ;�:���:�<� �>:�:W:::.>�.���:.`:.:. ::��... .3:.. `'�k't. . . . . :::.c ....... .v.. ���::...� ..::.::::::::�..::.::.:::.::::.::::._:::. ` _ � A neighborhood organization has `-' asked the MAC and the City of Minnea}�olis to spearhead a study of tbe impact of chronic noise on �uman health, as Part of �e state's decision to keep MSP m a metropolitan area. Baseline medical research studies should be conducted parti�u h sical persons vcrith the following p Y conditions: s�tress, hypertension, sleep distw'bances, sleep deficits, hearing loss and cardiovascular disease. Long-term effects of noise on children living under intense noise levels and the effects of chemical pollution (from released jex fuet and engine emissions) should also be investigated, in light of an anticipated 100 million flights at MSP in the next 20 years. This proposal came from a study group of Hale-Page-Diamond Lake �� � residents. S14���cC N�i6tSL�TT�� — -�..-��� ..-,.::�.- --..,�.�..;...�-.::...;:. ':::��� «:;:.:� :.: :::.: .: :.:..:: :`���..:::: . � :.:;<;�.... :< :> :� � :>: ::::: �<::::: �� :;:;:;:::;:::;:::>::>::�::<:<,>: �>::�::::;.;:.: .:.>::.::�: ::: .. <:: ,: : ::.:::.:::. .. .: . .. .:.:� ... ..:�� ::.>:.::..;:<: .. :: :::> ..�. . '.�.'. ;::�. :....:.. ::<::�1 ::: >:::<:::>::::::>:::::<:;:;:;:<::::>:::::::>>:;:::::::<:. ::....::: :::::.�.: :::: .::......: .: ... �:.:::.;.:::::.: r.:::;��:..>::::,�: . �>:.:>;::>:::<�::�<.:�:��::.<:::>�.:<:.::..:::.,::::.:....... .............. . �� Au�ust 6 National Nght Out SMAA�C Brochures For Your Block Party �all �22-�118 7 7 p,m. Ma.yor S. Sayles Belton City Noise Mitigation Plan Recommendations Roosevelt H'igh School 9 10 a.m. MA.0 Noise M'itigation Committee MAC Headquarters 6040 28th Ave. S. 12 7 p.m. Mayor S. Sayles Belton City Noise Mitigation Plan gecommendations Diamond Lake Lutheran Church 14 7 p.m. SMAAC Board Nokomis Community Center 19 1 p.m. MAC Commissioners Mezzanine, Airport 27 7 p.m. Public Hearing MAC Noise M'itigation National Committee 27 7:30 p.m. �C C Headquarters 29 10 a.m: MA.0 Noise 1Vlitigation Cocnmittee MAC Headquarters 0 A� 29 7 p.m. MAC Public Hearing on Noise Niitigation � Thunderbird Hotel 4 Se,pte�ber - 16 1 p.m. MAC Commissioners MA.0 Headquarters 18 7 p.m. SMAAC Boazd Meetin� Nokom�s Community Center 24 7:30 p.m. � AC Headquarters November 14 7 p.m. SMAAC General Meeting Ma.yflower Congregational Church .. ` •s.�a���ux �od.«� uo ���qnd i�saua� a�{� pu� diqsiaqcuacu ��y�s at�� `�uacuwano� aq� ui siap�ai pa�aia uuo�ut o� spun� aq� sap�no.cd sanp lno� •��rn si uot��dt�T�d ino� pu� dno.� s,uaz��i� � si ��y�s ��ua.un� �ou a.re no��i ��epo� drqslaqcuacu zno� nnauai as�a�d �dn{siaquxauc dn pred�o .rea� �s�i aq� sa�e�cpuc ia�alsnnau .�no��o Iaq�l �scj �u��reuc aq� uo iaquxnu a�s •aa�cuicuo� ��y�s � uo anaas o� �c�rjicnn a.� no�C�t x�aq� as�aid :dtZ :a���s :�T� :ssaipp� :auoc{d :acu�N (OS$) �ut�nqu�uo� (SZ$) �ut�oddnS (S T $) l�jaua.� LTbSS l�Ty1t `s�todsauu`y� •� �an� snqu►n�o� 9T15 3�'.I�1tS y1t�iO3'IVAA�I�21-.L1�i�L1t'I'IO2IIS ►� ��'I�1IS SOUT� 1VIETRO AIRPORT ACTION COUNCiL S�VIAAC 51�16 �olumbus Avenue South IVlinneapolis, N[TT 55417 (612) 822-8118 Meeting Announcement: With Mayor Sayles Belton on Airport Noise Mitigation August 7, Roosevelt High School, 7 p.m. August 12, Diamond Lake Lutheran Church, 576U Portland Ave., 7 p.m. Torn Laveli g g City Administrator 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 �. , ,� : `::" . , ;:i��:� . � y `4, a ,, r( 1 Jr�:�%; :;,;; ;;';�h. i. � :, -�,,.= :; �: � �:: t � ��,�{ —� �..+�.c ' . t j ' ' t n t'��,�' r � ;"��t6„�1„�.i:�.... -;j. t �..t..,i.+� � ��� I''` 9 �996 ���; � NORTHERN DAKOTA COUNTY AIRPORT RELATIONS COA�.IT��7' 2 _,;, .;�� "s � �� � .��T��� MII�'vUTES :.��::e��....�....u.�u�...�w.._�_ JtJLY 16, 1996 The Northern Dakota. County Airports Relations Coalition meeting was called to order at 7:30 a.m. by Sunfish Lake City Ad.ministrator Glenda Spiotta. in the Fireside Room at St. Anne's Episcopal Church, Sunfish Lake, MN. The following representa.tives were present: Sunfish Lake Mayor Frank Tiffany; Eagar: Jon Hohenstein; P✓�;;ndo�,. Heights: Scott Beaty, Kevin Batchelder. Inver Grove Heights and Mendota were no�t represented. AGENDA APPROVAL The Agenda was approved by consensus. MITtIJTES On a motion by Jon Hohenstein, seconded by Scott Beaty, the June 18, 1996 Min.utes were approved as distributed. DISCUSSION OF NOISE ABATEMENT DEPARTURE PROFILES The Coalition discussed the previous MASAC action on June 25, 1996 at which time a decision on NADP was postponed at the recommendation of Mendota. Heights. Kevin Batchelder and Jon Hohenstein reported on their discovery of flawed population da.ta being used in the analysis of NADP impacts and the cities' request for HNTB consultants to incorporate corrected information prior to adoption of a NADP. Kevin Batchelder stated that '�.- he has provided new data/maps to MASAC staff and als� indii;at�d th�re would be a purchase of pazcel specific da.ta. from Dakota County. There was discussion of the Coalition's preference for a NADP trial period instead of selecting a permanent profile. One impact will be the conversion to a Stage 3 fleet mix by the yeaz 2000 and the fact that noise contours may change with new procedures. It appeazs now that MAC staff opposes a trial NADP period. There continued general discussion of the significant differences between the Close-In and Distan.t depariure profiles with reference to the� summary of same in the MASAC Opera.tions Minutes of May 24, 1996. Kevin. Batchelder advised that Mendota Heights city - representa.tives recently toured their noise impacted neighborhoods to gain. field knowledge of the altitude/runway/noise decibel relationships. It was understood that at 3- 10 miles the Distant departure profile may have less sound impacts dependent upon the altitudes. NDCARC MINUTES July 16, 1996 Page 2 DISCUSSION OF AIRPORT NOISE MITIGATION PLAN Mayor Tiffany initiated discussion of the Mitigation Plan' status and probable effectiveness. Jon Hohenstein noted that this effort is different in that its emphasis is for future operations �lanning a.�-�d because of t�'�e level af �a.rticipation of elected officials at the ta.ble. Results from the Mitigation Plan wi11 be forwarded to MAC and then to the State Advisory Body for pot�ntiallegislative development. There was consensus that the State is obligated to fund some noise mitigation solutions; speculation followed whether tianding would result. Mayor Tiffany commented on his conversation recently with Dakota County Administrator Brandt Richardson regarding the Couniy's role in this matter. The Coalition will have to develop some appropriate actions/support to request of the County. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF NADP C� It was a consensus to support a trial test period of the selected NADP, recognizing that not a11 Coalition cities support the same position on Close-In v. Distant deparlure profiles. (. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF AIRPORT NOISE MITIGATION PLAN '` Jon Hohenstein led the discussion of wha.t the Coalition could reque.st or expect from Dakota. County: advocate for tools, support broader mitigation geographic area, lobby efforts at ' MAC now and later at Legislature, designate county support staff (as done for the airport expansion work). The Coalition offered amendments to the draft letter prepared by Eagan and Mendota. Heights staff, including: lead with the most impacted cities, instead of alphabetically, emphasize expansion to boarder geograpiuc area, point out populous areas, add garagraph to note that f.urther Coalition work will define joint agreement items to be provided to the Board. Discussion followed whether all cities should send their own letter or to try and consolidate signatures on one letter and the when to send the letter. Further discussion included assessment of the amount of efforts necessazy to be effective with the County Boazd, and general politics surrounding the MSP airport issues. � NDCARC Minutes July 16, 1996 Page 3 The Coalition reviewed the existing ANOMS system and concluded that originally cities had been advised that the ANOMS system would be expandable, but it now appears that MASAC staff consider it fixed in size. It was acknowledge that there wouid be benefit to have ANOMS poles in areas adjacent to the 60 dnl contour as well as within it. More discussion followed on thoughts of cost-sharing strategies to encourage an ANOMS expansion and whether the County would involve itself with noise mitigation cost sharing efforts.. The following Action Plan was created to facilita.te addressing Dakota. County involvement in noise mitigation plans: a. Send letter as amended from each individual city b. Schedule a Forum with the Coalition communities, the County Boazd and key staff inembers c. Emphasize "shared" positions between Coalition members Mayor Tiffany supported taking action steps prior to September, 1996 (the planned date when the Noise Mitigation Plan is scheduled to be presented to the MAC) and Jon Hohenstein encouraged the Coalition's strategy to focus on bringing the Counfy along in the evolution of - noise mitigation plan implementa.tion. It was a consensus to send the cities' letters as soon as Council's review and approve (azound the early part of August, 1996) and to request the County to work with the Coalition cities to be ready to assist northern Dakota. County when the Mitigation Plan is brought to the MAC. Scott Beaty recommended the NDCARC role is to identify those topics upon which the cities have agreement and to solicit County Boazd lobbying support at MA.0 and the legislature. He noted that most differences occur in operations issues and suggested the Coalifiion focus on noise mitigation. There was brief discussion on the pressures of increasing aircraft volumes and air traffic controller competency. Kevin Batchelder described a recent idea proposed by the Mendota Heights Mayor regarding an doubling increase in the passenger facilities charge with the in�re��P funds to be used. for � communities impacted with 50% earmarked for noise mitigation and 50% to cities' general funds. It was briefly discussion whether this would impact the equity issue. Discussion reiurned to when the Dakota County Board letter should be sent from the cities. It was confirmed that each city would send it as soon as possible according to its own City CounciUAdvisory Committee review and comment procedures. It was confirmed that NDCARC Minutes July 16, 1996 Page 4 Sunfish Lake, Mendota Heights and Eagan would bring the matter to their August 6, 1996 Council Sessions. Coalition cities' staff agreed ta meet to create a consensus list for a special Coalition meeting to be'held July 30, 1996 at 7:30 am. at Eagan. Kevin Batchelder offered to contact Inver Grove Heights to advise them of these developments and meeting date. It was agreed to provide Dakota County with a notice of the Coalition's agreement list by September 1, 1996. OTHER BUSINESS Kevin Batchelder distributed a draft developed with Jon Hohenstein expressing concerns regarding "backsliding" with regard ta the decrease use of Sta�� T� ai..r�raft in recent months. It was agreed to add "on behalf of NDCARC" and send as soon as p�ssible. �:���(�Ii: �1►��-�1 ►�1 The NDCARC was adjourned at 9:10 a.m. Glenda D. Spiotta, City Administrator City of Sunfish Lake � � r ,... � ' �� �� . �� �^��C.'.��' � � � � '��M�R �� ��i �:��.. mo � /' ...;,_ . . _ 00 ,� .. , o�'a:.,c,�� `��'[!�-,.,, . t'�-4'`vc,ci�' s�.;��. 1 • .' ♦ I i 1. ; .•. • • t •. .. ..:. � � . . � . . A MEETING of the Policy Advisory Committee wiii be held at the Generai O�ce of the Metropolitan Airports Commission NORTH VIKING ROOM , 6040 28th Ave. So., Minneapolis, Friday August 9 1996 at 12•30 p m Lunch wili be provided for PAC voting members and the consuitant team. • �. 1. Update: Homeowner "Upgrades° 2. Update: $25,000 CAP Issue 3. Update: Block Prioritization (1996 DNL contour blocks) 4. Update: Advancements in New Pa�t 150 Products and Styles PAC Members Advisorv/Consultants Dore Mead Gien Orcutt - FAA Ailen Lovejoy Steve Vecchi - MAC Tom Brown-MAC Jamie Verbn�gge Sheldo� Strom - CEE �arry Lee Mary Raasch - CEE Jon Hohenstein Pat Goodwin, Goodwi� Communications Keven Batchelder • Carol Kummer Scott Bunin ' Bob Johnson Rlchard Keinz if you cannot attend the meeting, please notify Melissa Scovronski (726-8141) with the name of your designated alternate. MEETING SUMMARY PART 1S0 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IMPI�EMENTATION DESIGN POLICY ADVISORY COMMIT�'EE May 7, 1996 The rneeting was held at the General Office of the Metropolitan Airports Cornmission, MASAC Room. The foilowing voting members werc; ir. att��aanc�: D�re Mead, J�.-nie Verb:ugge, Jo^ Hohenstein, uLv�: Batchelder, Bob Johnson, Larry Lee Consultants: Sheldon Strom-CEE, Chuck Rogers-CEE and Pat Goodwin-Goodwin Communications. Advisorv: Steve Vecchi-MAC, Tom Brown-MAC, Glen Orcutt-FAA Chairman Johnson called the meeting to order at 12:10 p.m. A report package was distributed to all members and is attached to the minutes for your reference: - 1992 - 1995 Part 150 Sound Insulation Program Homeowner Opinion Survey Results * Survey Statistics * Program Improvements * % Improvement - Overall Effects * % Improvement - Home Activities * % Improvement - Major Rooms * Horneowner Recommendations * Contractor Pecformance Rating � * Homeowner Opinion Pro�le _ * Homeowner Opinion Profile (before/after modifications) * Consultant Staff Profle ` - MSP Part 150 Residential Sound Insulation Program - Monthly Sta.tus Report as of 5-1-96 - Part I50 Sound Insularion Program Monitoring Data Steve Vecchi reported that the monthly, average number of homeowners invited to participate in the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program aze 130. Out of the 130, approximately 12% are declining participation in the program. The percentage varies from month-to-month. 1995 HOMEOWNER SURVEY RESULTS Staff has made numerous pro��ram and construction technique impcovements tq the Sound Insulation Program based on survey data. collected. MAC requests that all participatnng horneowners complete both Pre and Post Part 1 SO Homeowner Questionnaire Surveys. The surveys contain questions relating to overall homeowner satisfaction, as well as acoustical, contractor and consultant performance. This provides staff with a yearly indicator of how the program is being perceived by the eligible horneowners. 1 ( \ ' Glen Orcutt, FAA, briefed members on the timetable and mediation process during this process. This legislation has opened up the 60 DNL which would require updating the Part 150 Program, new contours will be generated, and will add a significant number of houses to the Sound Insulation Program. PFCs will '� ! have to be approved. Recommendations of the Mitigation Committee tivill impact the Part 150 Program. INFORMATION ITEMS Steve Vecchi reiterated that 2-weeks after the 12-19-95 PAC meeting, staff learned of an existing State of Minnesota. law prohibiting projects utilizing certified genera] contractors (restricted bid) to exceed a total cost of $25,000 per project. Only "open bid" projects are allowed to exceed $25,000. Unfortunately, items passed by the PAC in reference to raising the Cap ta $30,000 and increasing a duplex structure to a$60,000 joint Cap, canno� be approyed. The meeting was adjourned at 2:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: JEan Deighton, PAC Secretary PART 150 HOME0INNE}2 OPINION SURVEY RESULTS , • ' ' . 1992 1993 1994 1995 , # HOMES SURVEYED /# HOMES RESPONDING �%� 139 / 51 � (37%) �5 0133 499 /2 55 536 / 296 � � (55 /o) (51 fo) (5�%) °Io iMPROVEMENT: OVERqLi. EFFECTS: INSULA7ING AtRCRAF7' NOISE ` 88 84 93 94.5 IMPROVING INTERIOR H�ME ACIiNfT►Eg $9 86 ' 88 93 IMPROVING HOME C�MFORT S4 92 91 91 % iMPROVEM�NT: HOME AC7'MTiF.S; - ' TALKING ON THE PHONE g� 91 ,_._. 91 95 SIEEPING 83 n • --- . 82 83 LtSTENiNG TO THE TELEVISION 9� H9 ` 9� 94 % IMPROVEMENT: MAJOR ROOMS; LIVING ROOM � 9� 93 95 BEOROOMS � g9 91 9t.5 OINING ROOM ANO KITCHEN 7� 7s 90 94 CpNTRACTOR PERFaRMANCE RA1'1NG; PooR 14 • 6 2 0.3 FAiR 16 10 4 Goo� - 41 ' 3 ( . � 24 Zs.� � EXCE�LENT ZS 43 70 67 �- HOMEOWNER RECOMMENOA710NS: WOUlO YOU RECOMMENO TFfE PROGRAM TO YOUR 8O 9S ' NEIGHBOR? 98 9$ WOUt,O YOU RECOMMENO YOUR COtVTRqCTpR Tp 53 � $� YOUR NEfGHBOR� 91 93 HOMEOWNER OPINION PROFILE: DO YOU THINK YOUR HOME HAS INCREASEO !N s�j � MARKET VAIUE DUE TO INSUI.A110N %9 87 MOOIFICATIONS� AFi'ER iNsu�norv Mooi�cA�nor�s, wau�.o You 2T 25 ' STILL CONStOER MOVING� 27 3O CONSU�TANT STAFF PROFI�E: DO YOU FEEL CONSU�TANT STAFF ACCURATEIY 84 90 OESCRIBEO AND REPRESENTED YOUR INSULATION 93 97 MOOtFICqT10N PACKAGE� WAS THE CONSUITANT STAFF HELPfUI, i6 93 COURTEOUS AND PROMPT? 92 98 � , r� �. :�: �� :�. ., ?�_. ��J �:,y. . :;�. ... :�, A�' . .v, �, . 'i :t� :;�; � ;.;� : F�� :� : � �� ; ;,,,� �' ,�. .�; ,, i� :� h �-i .;:j :f; .,. � � ; TilESDAY, JULY 16 • .1996 . , ..,. , . ,� �� say�s runwa� � should be used ,�'or noise r°elie,�' When the north-south runway is built, an estimated three to iive yeazs from now, that new runway would accomplish the traffic arid noise shift that Minneapolis is seeking. Furthermore, the new north-.south runway virould cross the.end of Runway 4 22, taki�g 4- 22 out of regulaz use. With the north-south runway approved, the question now is� whether the longer 4-22 should be used for noise redistribution . until the north-south runway is 6uilt. The answer will be reached 6y leaders of the communities azound the airport; MAC officials and representat�ves of Northwest Airlines, who are meeting this summer as the Noise Mitigation Committee. The committee will recommend to the MAC and the Legislature what measures should be taken to protect communities from ill effects of the. airport's expansion. ' ::. The recommendations are ex- pected in September and . the. matter will come up. for discus- sion at the committee's meeting on Wednesday. Communities.still at odds ;;' Minneapolis Mayor . Shazon Sayles $elton has said her city ivants the lengthened ruritvay .to carry as much traf�c a� possible until the new north-st�uth runway is built. � . Bloomington and Richfield eontinue to object. Because the Federal Aviation Administration has required that noise-affected liomes be purchased or insulated if 4-22 is put into regular use, it does not make sense to, sp�nd mil�ions on � noise mitigafion virhen runway 4-22: will be used infrequeiitly once the north- south nynway�is built, said Larry Lee, Bloomington director of community development. ' '; . According to the MAC;, if the Xunway were put 'into .everyday = Runway e�ctens�n reki�dles noise de�ate � Cre�vs are finishing work on a halfinile extension of runway 4-22. The �ext . project will be constr�uction of a new NorthSouth runway. °M 1 How manyplanes wn71 use the extended nanway is being debated because I everyday use of the [unway woukl expose new areas of Richfieid and '. Bbomingt��n bo sgni%cant a'a�port �o'ise. Percent of tane that runways are used for daytime departures. {�t daytime departures . if used to spl'ead out noi.se - 25%��' ��23yy � � 2�%� �, �� '�s% 496 '� 2396 17°b �''' '� 1796 Sourc� MetropoGtan Ac�wcts Commissbn Star Tri�une graphic use, 75 homes would have to be purchased in Bloomington and 1,440 homes or apartments would have to be sound-proofed in Bloomington and Richiield at a cost of about $40 million: Roughly 7,000 people in south Richfield and north Bloomington would be subjected to bother- some noise levels if 4-22 were put into everyday use, and. roughly 4,000 people in south Minneapo- lis and north Richfield would get some corresponding noise relief, according to a MAC study. �The shift would occur during limited, off-peak hours when traffic is light enough not to require using airport's main runways. Richffeld City. Manager Jim Prosser does. not consider this a fa.ir. trade. "What's going to hap- pe�. in Richfield isn't just increas- ing the [noise] activity, it's also moving � the airport a half-mile closer," Prosser said, because the longer runway.: will, send planes closer to the city. If.that happens, he said, "we are going to have people in south Richfield saying,. `Do something about this.' They will be wanting buyouts and insu- lation." . Jan Del Calzo, a former air- ports commissioxier-and -now a consultant to Minrieapolis on noise issues, conceded that soundproo�ng and � buyouts in Richfield and Bloomington in light of the potential short-term use of 4-22 would pose problems that will have to be discussed. Nevertheless, she said, 4-22 should be used for noise redistri- bution until the north=south run- way is built. What people living under flight tracks want is some periods of the day without noise — even short periods, she said. � "People [in Minneapolis] go crazy when�they see those �gures showing 1 percent of the tiaf�c over Highland Park arid 3 percent over Bloomington. If they can just raise that somewhat by 4-22 that would be great," De1.Calzo said. . � � � Star Tribune Photo by David Brewster Construction crews have been pouring concrete for a haff-mile extension of the least used runway at the alrport. But�how many planes wlil use the newiy extended runway is stiil being debated. 1 � � • '; _ _ t � � �';/ ' /'// ' / ' /' ' ' / / / / By Laurle Blake Star Tribune Sta, fJ`'Writer By the end of August, more than 15 years after it was pro- posed, the half-mile lengthening of the crosswind runway at �the Minneapolis-St. Paul Internation- al Airport will be finished. Despite the time it took to build it, however, the concrete strip will be ready for traffic be- fore officials can agree on wheth- er to use it to redistribute air traffic — and noise. Originally, the extension of runway 4-22 was proposed for two reasons: as an extra-long xunway needed for the safe take- off of heavily loaded flights and as a backup' during.repair of the airport's two busy parallel run- ways. More recently the proje�t has been promoted as a way to shift some tr�c and noise away from south Minneapolis. Extending the runway creates the potential to redistribute flights around the airport because the runway's new length will ease its tra�c conflict with other runways and allow it to be used more &equently. But last year, after the Metro- politan Airports Commission (MAC) approved the $11 million extension for all three uses, Rich- field and Bloomington objected to the noise redistribution and Richfield sueii to stop it. The two suburbs cantend it would waste money to :expose new homes to noise and then have to spend mi�lions to, soundproof them. �To holii � off the lawsuit, the MAC, the Metropolitan Councii, Rich�eld, Bloomington and Min- neapolis began court-monitored negotiations, which resulted in a coznpromise: Build the extension while continuing to debate the runway's ultiznate use. As a result, the run�ay is being extended, but without an accom- panying taxiway that would allow planes to line up for takeoff. Without that taxiway, the runway cannot be used to send up the constant stream of traffic neces- sary to shift noise. The original plan was to iinish negotiations over the runway's future this spring. Biut the Legisla- ture's decision in April to expand the airport and 6uild a new north-south runway cast the de- bate on the future use of 4-22 in a new light, said MAC attorney Tom Anderson. Turn to AIRPORT on B5 fo'r: , —Future runway would put this one out of regular use. —A map showing the runways and how they'r.e used. � � -•,, AGENDA �� ° � �s� :� ItEGULAR MEETING -oqb,��� �� ] EEAGAN AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMLSSION ```�m�o,��,0�d� EAGAN, MINNESOTA """`Wd Cl'�'Y COZJNCIL i�iANIBERS EAGAN C1TY HALL August 13, 1996 7:00 P.1VI. .� � : ��� � � � �• II. APPROVA� O� NiIlVUTES wu. v i�a a vnca i u air: �r:Estii� IV. OLID BUSINESS A. Noise Compatibility Policies V. NEW BUSINFSS A. Aviation Noise limit Legisla6on VL OTHER BUSINESS VII. WORKSHOP REPORT A. August R'oc�shop Meeting VIII. STAFF gtEPORT A. Noise Ababement Depaiture Profiles '` B. MSP Mitigation Committee G Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor • D. MASAC Mee6ng of July 23 E. Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Coalition F. Ai�rnft Noise Legal Consultafion IX. INFOR1ViATIVE X. FUTURE AGENDA XL NEXT CONiMLSSION MEETING - 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 10 NEXT COMMISSION WORKSHOP - 6:30 n.m. Thucsday, August 22 NEXT MASAC MEE'TING - 7;�30 p.m Tuesday, August 27 XII. ADJOU�tNMENT Auxiliary aids,f'orpersons with disabilities will be provided upon advcmce notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less thun 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aTd. ; � ♦ C 8A So. St. PauUlnver Grove Heights, West St PauUMendota Heights Sun�Current/Wednesday, Aug. 14, 1996 . � ,� � � . C 1 • i_ ' 1. 1 By Mike Westholder Staff Writer A panel working on a recoznmenda- tion for mitigating the impact of the Min- neapolis St. Paul Intemational Airport reached one agreement Friday. The Airport Mitigation Committee won't be able to make its recominenda- tion in time to meet the Legislature-im- .' posed September deadline. . Committee chairperson Steve Cramer said the panel will need more time. Cramer concluded that the committee should push back to October the dead- line for its report to Metropolitan Air- ports Commission. "That way we can work our way through this and get a good set of rec- ommendations," Cramer said. Besides, most elected officialr will be � more focused on campaigning than on the panel's recommendations, he said. Last session, the Legislaiure directed ( �iC to produce a report on how best to `.�irect noise mitigation efforts to reduce the impact of airport noise on area resi- dents. In turn, M`AC appointed the mitiga- tion, committee. The comm.ittee is com- prised of representatives from MAC, Northwest Airlines, the Metropolitan Council and the mayors of the cities most impacted by airplane noise. Members ofthe mitigation committee scheduled a public hearing for residents to comment on the noise mitigation op- tions the panel is discussing. The public hearing will be 7 p.m, Aug. 29 at the Thunderbird Hotel, 2201 E. 78th St. in Bloomington. . During their fourth meeting to date; committee members coritinued to dis- cuss their positions on several mitiga- tion issues. Topics included expanding the boundaries for noise insulation and construction of a north-south runway for noise redistribution. � The crosswind Runway 422 is being extended by 2,600 feet and could be used� for noise redistribution after its. com- pleted next znonth. MAC liad planned to use 4-22 for noise redistribution but was prevented when the City of Richfield filed litiga- tion. That suit charged that MAC's envi- ronmental impact study of the runway and its impacts was not adequate. Through mediation, Richfield agreed to stay the suit when MAC agreed to build the extension without the taxi ways needed to use 4-22 for noise redis- tribution. Committee members briefly dis- cussed the use of the extended Runway 4-22 for noise r�edistribution, sending more planes toward south Richfield and north Bloomi.ngton and away from south. Minneapolis and north Richfield. Several stake-holders including rep- resentatives fxom Minneapolis, Eagan and MAC support the plan, while Bloom- ington and Richfield oppose it. To use the extended runway for noise spreading, the take-off points must be moved about a half-mile closer to resi- dents in Bloomington and Richfield. MAC estimates the cost of insulating and acquiring noise-impacted homes in south Richfield and Bloomington at $4� million. Committee members discussed the timeline for constructing a north-soutb runway along the west side of the airport property. ' If a north-south runway is built, thE 4-22 runway could not be used for noise spreading, making it only us,able for long haul and international flights. If the north-south is built in three years, it maq not be necessary to insu- late noise-impacted homes in Blooming- ton and south Richfield while Runway 4- 22 is used to redistribute noise, Metro- politan Airports Commissioner John Himle said. ' But if the uorth-south runway takes 15 to 20 years to build, insulation likely would be required in those areas most af- fected by 4-22. . Both Eagan and Richfield have voiced opposition to tlie north-south runway. �Himle asked the mayors of Eagan and Richfield whether their communities would attempt to delay the construction of a north-�outh runway through litiga- tion. Eagan Mayor Thomas Egan said his community is serious in its opposition and had not ruled out the option of liti- gation. . . Richfield Mayor Martin Kirsch said his community would reserve the right to litigate depending on the outcome of the environmental. impact statement being prepared. "We will always keep the option of 13t- igation to protect our residents," Kirsch said. . Richfield of�cials are particularly concemed with ground-level noise that will be generated on the north-south runway, he said. If the panel votes to recommend the north-south runway be built, Richfield should determine what mitigation ef- fbrts it needs to "soften the impact," Himle said. A position statement on that topic is being prepared and will be completed in about a month, Kirsch said. �