1995-11-15 ARC Packet�e
CI'TY OF NIEIV:DOT�4 HEIGHTS '
DAICOT� COUIViV, IVIIfVNESO'Te4
�►IRPORT RELATIONS COIVIIi�ISS101V
/�GEND�4
r
� NOVENIBER 15, 1995 ,, .
1. Cail to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Introduction of Kevin Batchelder, Interim City Administrator.
4. Approval of September 6, 1995 and October 11, 1995 Nleeting Minutes.
5. Acknow►ledge Receopt of Various Repo�tts/Correspondence:
a. MASAC General Meeting Minutes September, 1995.
b. MASAC Technical Advisors Report for September, 1995.
c. MASAC Operations Committee Meeting Minutes for October, 1995.
d. Press Release for New Airport Relations Commissioner.
e. Richfield Part 150 Buy-Out Updates for October, 1995.
f. SMAAC Newsletter for October, 1995.
6. Unfinished and New Business:
a. Discuss Status of IVon-Simulfianeous Departure Procedure
Implementation.
b. Discuss Nighttime Operations and Shouider Hour Considerationse
c. Discuss MAC Dual Track Presentation Scheduled for December 19,
1995.
�
7. Other Comments or Concerns.
8. Adjourn.
r
r .
Auxiliaey aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120.
hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City� of
Mendo#a Heights wiil make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this
may not be possibie on sho�t not6ce. Please contact City Administration at
452-1850 woth requests.
� � � � �
_ _( �
CITY OF IVIEIVDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA '
AIRPORT RELATIONS COIVIMISSION IVIINUTES
SEPI'ENIBER 6, 1995
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was
held on Wednesday, September 6, 1995, in the City Haii Large Conference Roam,
1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was cailed to order at 8:07 o'clock P.M. The
foilowing members were present: Beaty, Fitzer, Leuman, Surrisi. Commissioner
Olsen had informed the Commission that he would be late. Commissioners Olin
and Stein were excused. Also present were City Administrator Tom Lawell and
Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
Commissioner Leuman moved approval of the July 12, 1995 minutes.
Commissioner Fitzer seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
��,~� , � IVAYS: 0
Commissioner Leuman moved approval of the August 9, 1995 minutes.
Commissioner Fitzer seconded the motion.
AYES: 4
NAYS: 0
• � � � , • �
.�. �. .� �
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC Agenda Packet from
August 22, 1995.
Chair Beaty pointed out that the MASAC Commission acknowledged receipt
of a letter addressed to Mayor Tom Egan, City of Eagan, from Mark Salmen,
of Northwest Airlines, responding to the Northern Dakota County Airport
Relations Coalition's request to address the "distant" and "close-in"
departure procedures as outlined in FAA Advisory Circular No. 91-53A.
Beaty stated that Mr. Salmen responded that the MASAC Operations
Committee will be evaluating the benefits of the NADPs, and that the final
�'�3�'__. ' �
,; determination will be made by the MAC, not the air carriers. Beaty informed
the Commission that the Coalition disagrees with Mr. Salmen's approach to� �
this issue. The first set of decisions related to establishing NADDs were
made by the air carriers, and the Coalition would like NWA to reevaluate the
decisions they have already made relative to this issue. �
Chair Beaty noted that the ANOMS report has not been submitted for
= Commission review due to technical difficulties.
Administrator Lawell submitted the Operations and Complaint Summary fior
July 1995. It was noted that 100 complaints were received #rom Mendota
Heights citizens. The Commission pointed out that 114 calls were received
from St. Paul citizens. Administrator Lawell reviewed a Complaint Summary
map. It was noted that the area south of the Curley Addition registered
over 10 complaints.
The Commission felt that this summer's complaints were low due to
- weather conditions being hot and humid and that most people had their
windows closed with their air conditioning on. The Commission also
discussed the possibility of citizens getting tired of putting forth an effort in
complaining about air noise.
Administrator Lawell submitted a copy of the July 17, 1995 Special Meeting
Minutes of the Metropolitan Airports Commission. The minufies noted that �.
improvements of $300 million were made at Denver's Stapleton after the
decision had been made to build a new airport and that these improvements
were critical to the continued operation of Stapleton. The minutes also.
summarized discussion about the new Denver airport and that 80 major
contracts in the design area and 90 major contracts were involved in the
construction management. The entire project experienced 14,000 change
orders. It was noted that general airport revenue bonds were the major
funding source with the first issue in 1989.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the July 13. 1995 MASAC
Operations Committee minutes. The Commission discussed a letter of
request from the City of Eagan's Airport Relations Commission asking for
flight track analysis for operations southeast of MSP for the weekends of
April 29-30 and May 6-7. It was noted that the first weekend had
extremely loud aircraft noise while the second weekend was quiet. The City
of Eagan is interested in an analysis of these two weekends in terms of
compliance with current corridor boundaries and gate analysis. The City of
Eagan asked the MAC to discuss conditions of those weekends with the
FAA to determine operations or weather conditions which caused the
�€?��f��
: � ��:> ,
2 /�
difference in noise on the eastern edge of the Eagan.
The Commission discussed requesting from the MASAC Operations
Committee a special report comparing huskitted and non huskitted aircraft
flight paths over the City of IVlendota Heights. Administrator L'awell stated
that he would inquire with the Committee.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the South Nletro Airport Action .
Councii letter dated August 17, 1995. �, .
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the NWA Letter to Inver Grove
Heights dated August 4, 1995. Chair Beaty informed the Commission that
the NDCARC will continue to send correspondence to the attention of Mr.
Salmen at NWA.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Metropolitan Airports
Commission 1994 Report to the Public.
DISCUSS DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PG4NNING STATUS AND
STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTI�/ELY PARTICIPATING IN
THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS
(,+ �`'� Administrator Lawell explained that the Commission has been discussing the
��' -- status of the Dual Track Airport Planning process and the fast approaching
deadlines which will decide this important issue. �
Lawell explained that Mendota Heights' position is to not give an opinion on
the Dual Track process until the result of the study are fully known.
Lawell summarized that Dakota County Commissioner Bataglia had informed
the Cities of Mendota Heights, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights and Sunfish Lake
that an organized group known as SOAR would be making a presentation to
the Dakota County Board of Commissioners on the status of their efforts to
keep the new airport out of southern Dakota County. Lawell explained that
SOAR's presentation concluded by having the County Commissioner who
represents the Hastings area present a resolution which would formally
declare that Dakota County is opposed to a new airport and the very idea of
land banking for the future. �awell explained that representatives from the
northern Dakota County cities were able to convince the other
commissioners that this topic requires further discussion prior to the County
taking a formal position.
Lawell explained that this matter was tabled unit the September 26th
titfTJ.
����
� _- 3
., Dakota County Physical Development Committee meeting. He stated that
the Commission should spend time discussing ;the City's p'bsition before �
appearing before the County Board on September 26th.
With respect to long term lobbying efforts, Chair Beaty stated �that the
Commission should consider taking a position on whether the airport should
stay or be moved. He stated that Mendota Heights' real frustration is the
air noise issue. Beaty suggested that the City consider being in favor of
moving the airport unless specific terms are met such as narrowing the
existing corridor and equitable distribution noise. .
The Commission discussed the County's concern for selective land banking
and commercial land banking.
Commissioner Surrisi inquired if the City is aware of the community's
opinion on whether the airport should stay or be moved. She stated that a
number of Mendofia Heights residents have moved to this community due to
the proximity of the airport. Commissioner Beaty stated that a survey could
be conducted but that he is concerned about uninformed opinions and that
the community needs to be educated more about the air noise problem.
Administrator Lawell explained that the City has conducted surveys in the
past on other non-airport related topics. Commissioners Surrisi and Olsen
agreed that a survey may prove useful. _
��
Chair Beaty stated that if the airport stays in place, we need to know how
the community of Mendota Heights be protected from air noise.
Administrator Lawell reviewed biographical information on key legislator:s
who are involved in transportation matters. Specifically, legislators who are
involved on the House Transportation and Transit Committee, the Senate
Transportation and Public Transit Committee and the Senate Transportation
and Public Transit Finance Division Committee. Chair Beaty noted that there
are several out state committee members. The Commission discussed the
possibility of hiring a professional lobbyist. Chair Beaty suggested that the
City Council consider pursuing a professional lobbyisfi who specializes in
transportation issues. Commissioner Olsen suggested that the NDCARC
should become involved and should be the organization to pursue a
professional lobbyist. He stated that a common position amongst the Cities
makes fior a better stand. Commissioner Surrisi concurred. Chair Beaty
stated that the Cities of Sunfish Lake and Inver Grove Heights may be close
to Mendota Heights' stand on moving the airport.
The Commission suggested that if the airport stays, then the following
�;5 =�%�x,
,. ,i<,t,:
r;��:� � (
should occur:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Shrink corridor as new technology permits.
Equitable distribution of noise
NAPD standards, better use of Stage III aircraft �
Nighttime standards
Define corridor boundaries and implement fines for noise violation
Move general aircraft to reliever airport .
Not construct third parallel runway until 2015 �,
Commissioner Surrisi wondered if the MAC is of the opinion that the airp'ort
will never be moved. She also stated that some people believe that in the
future, people will be traveling less due to increased technology.
Commissioner Surrisi stated that the airport will probably have to be moved
and that if that airport does stay, then we will have to live with it. She
stated that she is convinced that the MAC cannot meet our conditions.
Chair Beaty stated that the City should try its best to require that these
conditions be met and that the media should be informed.
The Commission discussed that by modifying the corridor departure
procedures, overflights would be limited over populated areas.
The Commission discussed including other surrounding` City interests and
not just focusing on Mendota Heights interests. �
In response to a requesfi from the Commission, Administrator �awell stated
he would get a progress report on the mediation process and expenses from
Metropolitan Council staff member Nacho Dias.
The Commission discussed how the City needs to be more assertive in
dealing with the inequitable distribution of noise and that the City needs to
be more specific in letting the MAC know that Mendota Heights is receiving
the brunt of the air noise.
The Commission discussed better use of the corridor during non peak hours.
Chair Beaty suggested that non peak hours be defined as 10:30 p.m. to
6:00 a.m. The Commission discussed day time operations and how Chair
Beaty's suggestion would nofi include these operations. Commissioner
Surrisi suggested that the corridor could best be defined and used when
there is no potential conflict.
Commissioner Surrisi was excused at 10:28 o'clock P.M.
:: ....,,
.; The Commission discussed noise abatement departure procedures and how
.� Stage 3 aircraft will help minimize the noise impact on populated areas. The �'
Commission discussed implementing nighttime restrictions and how fines
could be incorporated if the restrictions are not adhered to by the airlines.
Commissioner Olsen stated that he does not want to see a growth in
nighttime procedures. The Commission was of the consensus that Stage 2
aircraft should not be allowed to fly during nighttime operations.
Commissioner Olsen stated that the airport should not stayrtif the north
parallel runway is to someday be constructed. He stated that a north �
parallel runway should not be considered until the capacity on the �
north/south runway is maximized.
� �r. � �� ,
� . � . � , ' � , � i
The Commission was of the consensus to table this discussion until their
October 11, 1995 meeting.
1�1�:�=- � _ '� •_ � _ _�
; ..,..
Administrator Lawell discussed the sfiatus of implementing the non-
simultaneous crossing procedure. Lawell stated that he has requested
�� copies of the recently modeled contours from HNTB. �
.. ,
Administrator Lawell stated the City Council will be reviewing the
Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport Area Community Protection Concept Package at
their September 13 workshop.
There being no further business, the Airport Relations Commission moved to
adjourn its meeting at 10:50 o'clock P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
��'����' 6
�,.
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
, . . � . , , � � �
• • ••
r
The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Cor,�nmission was
heid on Wednesday, October 11, 1995, in the City Hall Large Conference � Roorn,
1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was called to order at 8:10 o'clock P.IVI. The
following members were present: Beaty, Leuman and Olsen. Commissioners
Fitzer, Olin, Surrisi and Stein were excused. Also present were City Administrator
Tom Lawell and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser.
INTRODUCT10111S
Chair Beaty introduced members of Boy Scout Troop No. 264 who were in
attendance to fulfill requirements for a merit badge.
Commissioner Leuman moved approval of the September 6, 1995 minutes.
Commissioner Olsen seconded the motion.
AYES: 3
NAYS: 0
MISCELLANEOUS
Chair Beaty inquired if Mayor Mertensotto has spoken with Dr. Olin to find
out Dr. Olin's intentions on whether or not continue as a Commission
member.
, � � � .. �
.�. �. �• �
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC General Meeting
Minutes and Technical Advisors Report for July, 1995.
Chair Beaty noted that over fifty percent of aircraft operations at MSP are
Stage 2 aircraft. He also notecl that Mendota Heights registered only 100
complaints in the month of July. It was discussed that another newsletter
1
be sent to the community. The Commission reviewed the Nighttime Carrier
Jet Operations Runway Use Report and noted that Runway 4-22 was used �(
frequently in the month of July.
The Commission reviewed the Community Overflights Analysis and noted
that the Jet Operations - All Hours (arrivals).totaled 7004 over Mendota
Heights/Eagan .and 3,701 over South Minneapolis/North Richfield. It was
also noted that the Nighttime Operations (arrivals) totaled 41 S over Mendota
Heights/Eagan and 33 over South MinneapolisfNorth Richfi�ld. .
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Corridor Gate Penetration �
Analysis report for July, 1995.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC General Meeting
Minutes and Technical Advisors Report for August, 1995.
Chair Beaty noted the number of Stage 2 aircraft operations decreased
during the month of August. It was noted that Mendota Heights residents
registered 192 complaints in the month of August.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of Corridor Gate Penetration
Analysis report for August, 1995.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the MASAC General Meeting l
Agenda Packet for August, 1995. It was noted that Councilmember Smith
attended this meeting. �
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Part 150 Policy Advisory
Committee Meeting Minutes for September, 1995. The Commission
discussed how the Part 150 Sound Insulation Program began and how it
was determined that specific homeowners in the City were eligible to
participate in this program.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Northern Dakota County
Airport Relations Commission minutes for August, 1995.
The Comrnission acknowledged receipt of the Richfield Part 150 Buy Out
Updates for August and September, 1996.
The Commission. acknowledged receipt of the Stop the Noise! And National
Helicopter Noise Coalition Newsletter for September, 1995.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of the NDCARC Letter to NWA dated
0
,� September 1, 1995 which asked Mre IVlark Salmen, of NWA, to revisit the
' assumptions on which tHe proposed distant and close-in procedures were
designed and that the NDCARC be involved in the review process.
r �•,�
� . . � . � , ; � � � .
r Chair Beaty explained that at the last Airport Relations Commission meeting,
the Commission discussed the status of the MSP Airport A,rea Community
Protection Concept Package anci the need to define Mendota Heights' ;.
position relative to our current and long term air noise mitigation needs. '
The Commission reviewed a four page document, written by Administrator
Lawell, entitled "City of IVlendota Heights - MSP Airport Noise Mifiigation
Needs". Adminisfirator Lawell explained that a draft of this document was
reviewed by the City Council on September 13, after which Councilmember
Snnith and himself finalized the needs statement. Lawell explained that the
document was formally submitted to the MSP Communities Group Working
on the Community Protection Concept Package.
Lawell explained that the needs statement provides a very comprehensive
statemenfi of those items judged most important to Mendota Heights in its
i j campaign against air noise.
� The'Commission discussed how the statement suggests that the aircraft
departure corridor should be narrowed over Mendota Heights and Eagan and
to take full advantage of the latest air traffic control technology - Global
Positioning Satellite navigation system. The Commission noted how the
statement points out inequitable reliance on the Mendota Heights/Eagan
corridor and that it should be eliminated. The Commission noted that the
s�atement suggests that aircraft, during non-busy hours, should be directed
to fly a crossing pattern in the corridor, rather than being given departure
headings which overfly close-in residential areas.
The Commission was of the consensus to change item number 5, regarding
nighttime aircraft restrictions and hours of nighttime operations to 10:30
P.M. and 6:00 A.M. instead of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M.
Regarding Noise Abatement Departure Procedures and how the procedures
should be reviewed and adjusted to ensure that the full performance
capabilities of Stage III aircraft are being utilized, the Commission was of the
consensus to include Stage II aircraft.
3
The Commission discussed M�►SAC and how industry representatives
should not be included on the MASACa The Commission discussed how
more representatives from Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights should
be included on the commission.
DISCUSS DUAL TRACK AIRPORT
PLANNING MATTERS
Administrator Lawell explained thafi the Dakota County Board of ;
Commissioners has officiaily voted to oppose the relocation of MSP to �
southern Dakota County. He explained that this position was taken despite
opposition from the Cities of Mendota Heights, Eagan and Sunfish �ake who
argued that such a decision should wait until the final results of the six year
Dual Track Airport Planning Study are known later in 1995. Administrator
Lawell reminded the Commission that Commissioner Bataglia was supportive
of our City's efforts and voted not to support the Co4nty's position.
The Commission acknowledged receipt of a copy of the Dakota County staff
report to the County Board which outlines the logic used in making their
decision. The Cornmission discussed the adopted Dakota County position
which commits the Board of Commissioners to support noise mitigation
measures in collaboration with northern Dakota County cities. Specifically, �
Dakota County would ask the affected cities to define the noise mitigation
program which they desire and the County would join ..the cities in seeking
such a program through the MAC, �egislature and other cha�nels, as
appropriate.
Administrator Lawell informed the Commission that the Physical
Development Committee of the �County Board will meet on October 24,
1995 to consider a funding request from SOAR , Stap Our Airport
Relocation, to help support their Dual Track lobbying efforts at the capitol.
Lawell explained that SOAR has also proposed to represent the interests of
the whole County, as part of the funding request. Lawell explained that at
the September 27th NDCARC meeting, it was evident that northern Dakota
County cities are not in favor of this arrangement. Lawell stated that with
the County's stated position to assist northern Dakota County in its efforts
to mitigate noise, one option to consider would be to ask the County to
similarly fund our effort as well.
The Commission discussed an October 11, 1995 letter from Mayor
Mertensotto to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners informing the
Commission that the City of Mendota Heights objects to Dakota County
0
,r spending taxpayer dollars in support of lobbying costs for a narrowly
focused organization, (SOAR). This letter informs the Commission :that
SOAR has never met with representatives of Mendota Heights to discuss
Mendota Heights' objectivesa The letter aiso informs the Commission that
Mendota Heights' does not believe that SOAR represents the City's interests
in the Dual Track debate and our noise mitigation concerns.
The Commission discussed a draft letter dated October 19, 1995 from the
NDCARC to Dakota County Commissioners which informs #he Commission
that the NDCARC acknowledges the County Board's position to formally :.
oppose the relocation of MSP to southern Dakota County and that the '
County has pledged to support the efforts of norfihern Dakota County cities
in their continuing efforts in battling against aircraft noise.
This letter specifically discusses the NDCARC's position that they are not
comfortable being represented by SOAR in matters related to overall noise
mitigation concerns, and that the northern Dakota County interests will
suffer under such an arrangement since the SOAR organization has as its
primary emphasis the prevention of airport relocation, not the reduction of
air noise over the northern part of the County.
The Commission discussed two options the NDCARC suggests that the
i; j County Board review. First, the County could decide not to fund SOAR,
thereby leaving all parties on their own to lobby their respective positions.
In the alternative, the County could choose to pledge an equal amount of
money to both efforts, allowing SOAR to more clearly focus on its relocation
opposition efforts, and the NDCARC to focus more clearly on its noise
mitigation efforts.
The Commission was of the consensus that NDCARC should send a letter to
the County Board on this important issue. It was noted that the City of
tVlendota Heights cannot sign this specific letter unless it is consistent with
the October 11, 1995 letter sent by Mayor Mertensotto.
DISCUSS GPS PRESENTATION �
SCHEDULED FOR OCTOBER 25, 1995
Administrator Lawell explained that IVIr. John Foggia will be at the Mendota
Heights City Hall on Wednesday, October 25, 1995 to give a presentation
on GPS. The Commission acknowledged that members from the NDCARC
have been invited as well as Councilmembers from Mendota Heights. It was
noted that the entire Airport Relatians Commission should be in attendance
for this presentation.
5
UPDATE ON NON-SIMULTANEOUS
DEPARTURE. PROCEDURES � �
Administrator �awell informed the Commission that he is still waiting for
John Foggia to upciate him on the status of this request. �
ADJOURNMENT
r
There being no further business, the �►irport Relations Commission moved to
adjourn its meeting at 10:20 o'clock P.M. � .
RespectFully submitted,
Kimberlee K. Blaeser
Senior Secretary
6 �
� �� MINUTES
METROPO�ITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCI�
GENERAL MEETING '
SEPTEMBER 26, 1995
7:30 p.rt�.
r
� 6040 28th Avenue South .. �
Minneapolis, Minnesota ;
1. Call to Order Roli Call
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and the secretary was
asked to call the roii. The following members were in attendance:
Mark Salmen Northwest
Jennifer Sayre Northwest
Brian Bates � • Airbome
Peggy Hiiiman UPS
Bob Johnson MBAA �
John Smith Minneapolis CC
Dick. Keinz ' MAC
; � Mike Teegardin Minneapolis
'` - Scott Bunin St. Paul
Carol McGuire St. Paul � �
Thomas Hueg St. Paul
� Don Priebe � r � Richfield • -
Jamie Verbrugge Richfietd
Ann Lenczewski Bloomington �
John Neison � Bloomington
Jiil Smith Mendota Heights
Ed Porter 8umsvilie
Jim Hollenbeck � Bumsville
Dale Hammons Inver Grove Heights
Manny. Camilon St. Louis Park
Advisors
Bruce Wagner FAA
Cindy Greene FAA
Ron Glaub � FAA �
Roy Fuhrmann MAC Supv.Aviation Noise Programs
Traci Erickson MAC ANOMS Specialist
Guests
Jan DeiCalzo Minneapolis
, � Philip McGuire St. Paul
�___ . � �
2. Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the August 22, 1995, meeting were approved as presented.
�
3. Introduction of Invited Guests
Receiat of Communication
No invited guests.
A copy of the following cor�espondence is attached to the minutes.
�
A letter was received 9-26-95 from Mr. Jan J. CaR of St. Paul, on behalf of the Portlar�d
Avenue Neighborhood Organization (PANO) who are a group of citizens concemed about air
traffic noise. The letter complained of landings befinreen 3:30 to 5:00 a.m. which are
unreasonable and unduly disruptive. The letter requested to redirect air tra�c away from this
area between 11 p.m. -?: a.m.
A copy of a letter received 9-25-95 addressed to Mark Salmen, Northwest Airlines, from
Northem Dakota County Airport Relaiions Coalition, asked that Northwest revisit the
assumptions on which the proposed Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NAPDs) distant and
close-in procedures were designed,-and•that the Coalition be-involved in the •review process.
Mark Salmen responded that the NADP procedures are coming up for Operations Committee
review. NADPs, both distant and close-in were developed specifically for each individual
aircraft, taking into consideration safety of flight, and they are part of Northwest's (operations
specifications) pilot procedures. The MASAC Operations Committee will not be reviewing
changing particular aircraft type procedures.
� � �� � � � �
John Nelson, Bloomington, asked staff for an update on the HNTB contours. Roy Fuhrmann
responded that MAC received a preliminary proposal on cost to run the contours and should
receive the new contour information within two to three months. The data will consist of three
contours for each aircraft type (727-200s, DC9-30 hushed, 757 and 747-400) on Noise
Abatement Departure Profiles close-in and distant. .
4. Technical Advisor's Runwav Svstem Utilization Report and Complaint Summary
Roy Fuhrmann briefed the reports for July and August 1995, which were distributed at the.
meeting. Points of interest included:
July 1995
Stage 3 operations were at 46.3% (due to hushkitted, NWA DC9s). There was a slight
decrease in noise complaints from 1994. Operations increased to 1340. Favorable winds
allowed a 20% increase in utilization of the Crosswind runway.
August 1995
There was a major wind shift befinreen July and August - a lot of southerly winds. Stage 3
operations were at 46.8%. There was a decrease in noise complaints from the previous month.
Operations increased to 1345 due to new intemational flights from Canadian markets,
Operations increased 10% over August 1994 due to regional commuter flights. The community
�
2
overflight analysis showed a high number of arrivals over Minneapolis because of prevailing
sou#herly winds.
Remote Monitoring Tower (RM'i� site 12 is not operating due to street rennovation in St. Paul�.
The RMT is in the bidding process at this time for a new location. The new site should be
completed within two months. ,
A discussion session followed.
Don Priebe, Richfield, questioned the report format on page three - Tower Log Repor�, asking
that it be worded more clearly. Staff will note on page three "Available Time for Operations"
to help clarify. r
Jamie Verbrugge, Richfield, asked staff to send information on nighttime Run-Up Pad use. Mr.
Fuhrmann informed the council that in the month of October, reconstruction will be done to the
Run-Up Pad, extending the fence upward to further contain the noise. The Run-Up Pad area
will be closed for the next month. The approach to Runway 4 will be used in the interim for
run-up purposes: MAC Operations will file a complete report on any run-ups which occur
during nighttime hours. Mark Salmen added that run-ups conducted during the nighttime hours
are strictly regulated by MSP Field Rule which ctearly states "only fo� operational necessity".
Jill Smith, iVlendota- Heights,�requested• separate pages in the-Technical Advisor's Report for
the�nighttime flight tracks. Staff will produce.the tracks for one month which will be examined.
A detennination will then be made whether or not to continue producing separate tracks as a
regular report item.
I )
5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council
���
6. . Report of MAC Commission Meetina - September 18. 1995
Chairman Johnson repo�ted that the cities of Phoenix, Pittsburgh, and Chicago, had speakers
present at the meeting who reported on how they are expanding their current airports.
The commission voted not to continue researching the "remote runway concepts" and to
proceed only with the Dual Track process. In July 1996 a final decision will be made on
whether to expand the existing airport, or to build a new airport.
7. Other Items Not on the Aqenda
Chairman Johnson introduced statements made previously by staff regarding putting
information relative to MASAC, and noise issue reporting on the INTERNET.
Roy Fuhrmann explained that one of MASAC's goals is to get more, and accurate information
out to the public in many different forms (i.e. cable television and information on the Intemet).
The Intemet is an incredib{e information resource tool. MAC is currently looking at access
[�3
choices for hook-up to the Intemet. Staff requests that MASAC show their support and
endorse using the Intemet as a means of an information source.
� .,
John Nelson, Bloomington, spoke in favor of pursuing use of the Intemet: H� asked if staff (
would prepare an outline, o� a written report on use of the "Intemet" in order to equalize the
knowledge of all MASAC members. An exert from Airport Magazine will be mailed with the
October meeting package for review. Staff will give a short presentation on Intemet
capabilities at the next meeting.
The September 8, 1995, minutes of the Part 150 Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) were
distnbuted to all members. Jainie VerbruQae, Richfield, moved, and John Nelson,
Bloominqton, seconded, that MASAC support the Policv Advisorv Committee motion approved
September 8. 1995, as follows: recommend to the full Commission and the FAA, full inclusibn
and elipibilitv for anv blocks intersected bv the outermost DNL65 contour boundarv of the 9996
Noise Exposure Maa in the Part 150 Sound lnsulation Program. A vote was taken and
unanimouslV passed.
John Nelson, Bloomington, asked if the 1994 Baseline for the NNMM (New Noise Management
Methodology) has been established (Stage 2 usage fo� each of the air carriers)? Has a letter
been drafted by staff to bring the air carriers into the voluntary provisions of the NNMM? Roy
Furh'mann responded that the 1994 Baseline stage has not yet been established at the current
time for each of the air camers. It is in the� process, as well as a draft letter to the air carriers
conceming the issue of the NNMNI and acceptance of the agreement. A preliminary
concensus is expeeted within the next month.
Tom Hueg, St. Paul, asked if MASAC is planning to hold another joint meeting with MAC in
1995. Chairman Johnson �esponded that staff will communicate this request to the (
Commissioners to see if scheduling will permit. Chairman Johnson, and members expressed
the need for clear and concise priority topics if a joint meeting is to take place: The council
needs to be polished and prepared. • �
8. Adioumment
Chairman Johnson, adjoumed the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Jean Deighton, Secretary
UPCOMING MEETING DATES
Full Commission MASAC
November 29, 1995 December 5, 1995 ,;.,,
1:00 p.m.- Room 303 7:30 p.m.
Planning & Environment Committee
November 8, 1995
a.m. to be determined = Room 301 _ _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ ( ' ,
�
�
�
�
�
%
--- - ----�____........�......���������iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii/////////////
e;
�.!
o�
;� —� 1�Ianneapodis / St. Paud Iraternataonal Airport �
_ .._.. _
�� �`� � MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Airport Sound'Abatement Council
ctet.,,��.•
Robert P. )ohneoo
�ce C/nimmn:
sawt e�tu
Technica! Adv'vor:
Jo6n FoggJn
Seentary:
Je� Deig�bo
Atrbome F�p�nra:
ar+� eat«
AirTrohrpo't Araociation:
Pail McCraw
��:
Chatia W. Carry 7r.
c;ry ofetoomi,rgron:
Petrma I,ee
v� w�u�:
Ci y clBrnmvilte:
Jum RSvm
cry yre��:
Du.Nn hIIddc
c;y cft,rve.crovex�;8hn:
Demie Maddm
Clty cjMendola Nelghtr:
r�n s�m
City c#'Minneapotiar �
Iaoee & &xtin
id� xta,ea
Jae Lee
i�um u�
cry �Rr��w.•
c��.
n� ea�
cry �sr. co�c, ra,t
xou«�e nanw.
Ctry ajS1. Paul:
ecoa E�in
crdQc.w�a�
Card Aaa Me(:+ire
Delfa AlrLitra Inc:
wd� ioa..d�
F�d�r��::
T� enao«�
Pademr Av;ar;on Adm;ni,tmBon:
Beoce Wa�aee
tt�a ct�n
MACSt�•
Didc Hdos
MBM:
Itdxrt P. Jdmem
Mun6o Norllovuf Airlrnt:
Iawrmce McCabe
Mehopolitan Ai�pav Cammia.rion:
Com�dmer Alba Ga�er
MNAirNational Gtnd;
Mq� Maek B. Nm
NorilovutAirliirr:
.�� s�m
7�+ra s�
s�. r«,�c��c��:
Jadc Ho.kley
Sun Cormtry Airlinr:
LnkeA.Games
UniledAirUnes Irta:
AOan Tomiinm
Unitaal Pareel Smvt ce:
9tare Walicer • Pa�y HIQm�
US. Air Fare Rererva:
Captatn Btavm Clupman
us. supplrmeura! ccr,;,,,:
� ti�
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Declaration of Purposes
l.) Promote public welfare and national security; serve pub.lic interest, convenience,
and necessity; promote air navigadon and transportadon. international, nadonal. state,
and local, in and thraugh this state; promote the efficient, safe, and economical
handling of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in national and international
programs of air traasportaiion; and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the
meaopolitan area in rhis state as an aviaaon center, and to correlate that area with all
aviatio� f�cilities in the entire state so as to provide ,�or the most economical and
effective use of a�ronautic facilifies and services in that ai�ea; •
2J Assure the residents � th�e metropolitan area o�f the minimum environmental imp�t
from air navigation and transportad�, and to that end provide for naise� abatement.
control of airport area land use, and other prot�ctive measu�s; and
3.) Praanote the overall goals of the state's envitonmental polici�s and minimi�Q �
public's expasure to noise and safety hazards around airports.
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council
Statement of Purpose
This corporafion was formed in furtheranoe of the general welfare of the communities
adjoining Minneagolis-Sk Paut Internadonal Airpart - Wold-Chamberiain Fieid, a
public airport in the Crnmty of Hennepin, State of 11�nnesota, through the alleviati� of
rhe problems c�eated by the savnd of aincraft using the sirport; rhrough study and
evalvation on a continuing basis of the problem and af suggesdon for the alleviatiaa� of
tt�e sam�; through iniflation, c,00rdinarion and promatia�n of reasonable and effective
pra�edures, control and regulations. consisteat with the safe operation of the airport and
of aircraft usin,g the same: and throu$h disseminadon of info�maaon to the affecced
communities. their. affected residents, and �e users of the airport respecting th�e
problem a� si�+craft noise musance and in respect to suggestions macle and acdons
initiabed and taken to alleviate the. problem. ,
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council
Representation
The memberstup shall include representatives appointed by agencies. corporations,
associations and governmental bodies which by reason of tl�eir statutory authority and
responsibility ,or control aver the airport. or by reasa�n of their status as airport users.
have a direct interest in the aperati� of the airport. Such members will be called User
Representatives and Public Represe�ntatives. provided that the User Representatives and
Public Representatives shall at all times be equal in number. .
The Airport 24-hour Noise Notline is �26-9411.
Complaints to the hotline do not r�sult in changes
in Airport activiry, but pravides a public sounding
board. and sirport iaformation outlek The hotline
is staffed 24-hours Monday - Friday
This repatis prepared and printed in house by
Roy Fu6rmann and Traci Erickson
Questioas or comments may be dinected to:
MAC - Aviaflon Noise Program
lbfinneapolis ! SG Paul International Airport
6040 28W Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450
Tel: (612) 725-6331, Fax: (612) 725-6310
Metropolitan Airports Commission Aaiation Noise Programs ,�
i . .
� /
, J i ! / ' / / ` / / : / / ;
Operations Surnmary - All Aircraft .....................................................................................1
MSP Se�tember Fleet Mix Percentage .......................................:........................................1
Airport September Complaint Summary ..........:...................................................................1
x September Operations Summary - Airport Directors Off'ice ...............................................1
'ii� ,'i � i � r� r� � �,i i
Complaint Sumrnary by Ciry ..........
� :/ ' l'� � ' / I
............................................................................2
AllHours ..............................................................................................................................3
NighttimeHours ..........................:.......................................................................................3
Runway Use Report September 1995 ..................................................................................4
� . , � i:� i �
Runway Use Report September 1995 .....................:.:........:......................:..........................5
, , . ' � i. , i � �
Runway Use Report September 1995......
, , � , , ;� i , i �
....:.....................:..................:...................6
Runway Use Report September 1995 ...................................:..............................................7
i � , � � , , � � �, ;
` r i � � i i � � � � ' � � . t
� �
i � j� � �. �� . ��, � �
DaytimeHours :..:......................................................................................................:........10
, Commu�ity Overflight Analysis 11
�;� � �
_
Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours ...........................:....................................................:....11
- Carrier 7et Operations - Nighttime (11pm = 6 am) .............................................................11
__
Aviation Noise Programs . . .
a
Remote 1Vlonitoring Site Locat�ons 12 �
Carrier Jet �lrrival Related Noise Events l3 �
Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT .......................:.............................13
/ � � , � � / i � i , � i � � i i i
Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT .....................::
� � � �'� .' ; � � , , �, ,�
� � �� � � � � � �� ��; �
Ten Loudest Aircraft Noise Events Ideni�,�"ied 17
� e �',, • , / , , � , , ,; ;
' / / ,. t � � � � � � � � �
, � ,.' , ,. , � , , , , , , �
� / i I , /' 1
...:.................14
C�
AirportNoise and Ope�ations Monitoring Systems Flight T'racks '22
Camer Jet Operations - September 1995 ............:.:.......:.:.:...:....:.....:::.::.::....:::.....:.....:
......22
Airport Noise and Operations Monitoring Systerit Flight Tracks 23
` � Carrier 7et Operations - September 1995 ...............:..........:.......................:......:.................23
Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Ai�craft Ldn dB(A) �� 24
Analysis of A.ircraft li�oise�Eve�ts - Aircraft Ldn dB(A) 25 �
.=.��h:�
�. . ,. � �
, Aviation Noise Programs . ,
W� Metropolitan AirPorts Commission -
t�perations and. Complaint �ummary
� � Septegnber 1995
.;
Operations Summary - All Aircraft .
i j;
x
04 357 2.0% 87
22 . 305 1.7% 613
11 8844 48.9% � 9472
29 8574 47.4% 7755
MSP September Fleet Mix P'ercentage
O.S�o
3.4%
52.8%
43.3%
Airport September Complaint Summary
September Operations Summary - Airport Directors Office
� . . . � � � :;:;;y:::::>::;.:::r:'r.'+':::::�:i � .. -. . .. ..
. . . ;�v }.�. . i...
. ':2�.n.
. :::::x'��::�::3:: ;
:::<���::�:,.,;. :;
<::'s': s':;'>'s: i �: :
. `:•'•.'.i;F:....,,:.;:.;,�:...;'.:�::;:t:•r;;:•>:o:�: ...,o:..;; .
�L�:kF•
::.�:,atx�•.;; ::::::::::.. :::::::::::::::::.:.;•:.
� , :.:>.:::::y... :,:.:.::::.
..; .....
..). ��•: :�..
.. , .., :...,::.�,..... :..•::;.,.::::; . •
Page 1 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs , . -
� . Metropolitan Airports Commissian a
, ; .
Niinneapolis - St. Paul In�ernational Airport Complaint Summary
September 1995 °
.�
Complaint Summary by City
�Time of Day Nature of Complaint
Aviati� Noise Bi.SateIlite :Frograms.. : �
�
n
�"
Page 2
_. ..
� `Metropolitan Airports Commission
, Available Time f�r Runway �.Tse
' '�ovver Log I2eports - September 1995
,, Att Hours
:;:::::.:�:�'`a..':.
.,:::.,.:;:�Z�t�l���.:... .
� ::>�::�:'�o::':;;:;;:..
`'`:::::�`' ;::;::��:�r�::_ _ ......... :..
r
' � � . � ,� . Nighttime Hours . �
� ._� ..-'. .� � ' '� . �.� 4 '� ' ..
. . , .. . :. .. , " . :. , �. � � 4
. . . � Y . . �� .
. . .� .; .:.�. -
' .. . .. . „k�� . .
. ..
, . .; . ., . , - , i . . : . - . .
x.
. . � ... . . ::v'4}�j?;{ . ' .
. . � '+`•n . . .
: � � �. ' .. �.. . :. .
� �`::ii:�:::vi::: • '� ' i:
. •..x:::!:vi
w:: ....
....v: n
.......
...:.. ,. .'.�
. .,.�.. .+::•. .. .�. . .�. �,,'.
i
....... . . �.. �
,� ... . vv: :; . �'� '. ': . " .: �:. :i...::. �' ':. .. . . . .
� i:�'•%i:�•'•••� .. . .. ... � � . - . .
w: :..
ii: . .:••
... . ::::.
i�i:�:ti::::::: :n�:. , ''vi�•� `y�. . .. . .. ... .. .
. . . . . . .. . . . ... .. t'��iFICY�� i:+... � . .
?`si;fl;•;:JEt:;i;,. T— J
��O O�`4"/ �O�
_ , . � Ooo� o� . , , . .
_ o°� ..
0 0 Zg
� __.
O� � ���::�:��:���`���� .
� ::::�` �::�;
`;�::.:::>
,�„ ....�..�............
...�<��
; , - ...
� � >::>::;>:�::>:.:. � . .
::> ;::� :>:::>::>::;:.
.>:.,;::........::». , .: <
- ::::::<�:�:�`a :: . .. , ::. . : ;., .
� . . . . . . � � . .. . -� l< ' . �
. .
.. . � ... . ` ��' . . ; �. ., .�� �.. .. �.. -_.,.� _ . t �. , .
,
• "�. �.i:N1 j.:
Page 3 Aviatxon Noise &. Satellibe Programs ;- ,� ,
�
� Metropolitan Airnorts Comm.issi� N
` -
t�l� Operations
,
Runway �:Tse i2eport Septernber 1995
»:fl��:'�Q ' i � `
7' �, �":�,.������������'.
__
3708 20.7% � ` 3865 23.4% . ( '
�:::�ti;<:,:::: :: .
�J� ><�,:�::�:�:::::: �
�..h . �'}�
.# .
�. •F.•l{Si+��.:i`.::.i':{y.i}i.:}.':'}:::�:•:;.; ;:• ...}
:::.i'::.}•:: ..:: .::.,�...;i. :::{::{:::::::::::.�:.;
':�:v ?�'•; y: ( v�}'�'r' :•::;F::i:;'?;..:. •.' :>i�ti:>.i:} , �
�;�'^}}K; .`,: ; Y:',F,:±rii: �•{{j ;/�
;>:°��`• :� :<:..fi..., .::::<x:h�:�{��:::�.,�•�. .� :{<r:.::•:< :<
:.,.:r:.
�' .�.:l..i.�;,N,•••;R„� v} <:v��:YM•::;:!;:iy :..
�:<�,>
,,:�:i.•: nay:'f>:ti..ti•: •
,.>:
.•:;�::�::;:::_;:�
..:A.::: •
:...... .. .....:,. ..... ...�.; , ..::
:::::.::::.. . •:;:•:::�i:.. •.:•::
.,; ;;:<::�; ::::: • . . ..................... ...
....
::.::::::...:::•::;:x;.;•.. : •: •. .:rr::. ..,:.........:. .. ::.�:.y:::•::.;::::.�:::...:...�c.,,:.:: •::.::•..:.;•::::::.:::•:::.:�.::.>:>:::a::•::
Aviatio�n Noise & Satellite Programs `,; ,, Page. 4
� 1Vtetropolitan Airports Commission � . .
Carriea- �(et C.�perations
` Runway �::Tse 12eport September 1995
::>:::
......
, , ,, ......
� � .
. ::::::>:::::;i����:;��.
�.��<::%'"�tG'X}t:�' � ...
0
Page 5
Aviatia�n Noise &.Satelhte Programs , " �
�, I
I
. �
�
. �
i
�
F
' . Metropolitan Airports Commissiaan o
Nighttime - A.il Operations �
,
- Runway Use Report September 1995
� ::;::::::��#�:�: ' �
;'°�' � �.�����"��`:::` ,
�
Aviatiaai Noise & Sa6ellite Progcams �.. `�` � age 6
_ P.
' Metropolitan �rports. Commission
� � l�ighttime Carrier Jet C)perations
� �2unvvay Use Report September 1995
,; ::>:::::>:
, ::>:.:>::::.
; :::>:::<:>:::<:::::>. ,
. _:::::::;:>�:::�:�::
e
::::fr:s:•<.::„•: ����3' � ;�Fi�s.�r: ::s�><a<.: •�y�� •• ;,��:r. :<:�:;;;z:>::>s. : ;;:>:>:::<:.�:;�:: > /�y :s:•:..:>::>:: . . . .
:>: {.:..r:::•::��7:F:�:. • :: 7. :;:i�.li�{i•. :�:i::i ' . .
' ..:... � ,.:::.:::. . ...::::::: .:<;::: �/�'y
4..:Ciii}':i :�4��.+?i:?�: •iJ��:�F.K.'•.'.}<:�Jii:
ti}}>iiiii�i}?;?::}r
}}:>. �::.?
�<{�'%iYy,:;i::�'�iiiiiii:'t.�il}iiiiii:::; • .
:::. :; :.: . . . ..': y
:::::n . . vi.�::
...... :::::::::::y . . . .. :::::::
. ...:'::.
Aviatio�n Noise & Satellite Programs , . .
;
�
;
�
s
� _ Metropolitan Airports Commission '�
. : ..
Carrier Jet IDperations by.Z`ype
Septerr�ber 1995 �
::::::;� ��:::,::::::>::::;::::>:::�:::::>:>:>:::::>::::::::::::>:>::: :>;::::>::::::{:::::::::::;:::: ::::::::::::::><:::::: ::::>::»:::>::::::::::::::::>::::::>::::::::<:.:::>::: :
,
::::::::�ccr�i�::::� ::: �: �: �. :�:::::::: ::>:<:::>::> :::: :::::. ........ ::>::::::::::::::: ::>:: ;:�.,..:... .: ::....: . � .<::..: .:_;,; .
.::.�::.;:`�`3��:�.>::::>::>;:::::: �Loun�:>::::>::::>:::::::>�*��c�� �.:.
:.:.:�.:: :.:
B707 0 0.0%
B727H 198 0.9%
B�33/4/5 1305 5.7%
B747 179 0.8%
B74F 13 0.1%
B757 1737 7.5%
B767 1 0.0%
BA46 1 � 0.0%
'` .,� , � - 1/
. �} � �
DA10 8 0.0%
DC10 835 3.6%
DC87 180 0.8%
DC9H 1796 -7.8%
EA31 7 0.0%
EA32 2174 9.4% � .
FK10 1148 5.0%
L1011 8 0.0%
MD11 54 0.2%
NID80 1232 5.4%
BA1Q 7 0.0%
BAll 0 O.o% 52.3% Stage Il
: "B727 3703 16.1%
B737 599 2.6% +.
DC8 98 0.4%
DC86 0 0.0%:' _
DC9 7635 33.2%
(�
FK28 0 0.0%
:::::<::::>::::>:<::::::::::>::>::>::::::��::>:::::::::>::;<:>::::::::::::>::::::::::.>:;<::�.:;��::::::�>;::>::>:::::>:;::::::;>:::.;;::::.:::>�:::.:::.>:;»:::. , r �
:>::::�'� �: . .
�.
�.. ;:><�:> <;::: :::>:::: :::
........... ......... . . :.�:.:::.::.
�::> �.� � `�' �> . <::..;::::
Aviati� Noise &.Sa�ellite�Progcams: ", � Page 8
, Metropolitan Airports Commission
Aircrafi Id.entifie�. and I)esca-ip�ia�nTable
; ,
�
I
. BOEING 727
BOIING 727 - HUSH KTT '
BOEII�TG 707 '
BOEII�tG 737-300 �
BOEING 737
BOIING 737 200 SE[2�'.S _
BOEING 747
BOEING 747 FREIGAT�R
HOEII�TG 7S7
BOIING 767 � �
BRTTISH AIIZOSPACE 111 . �
BEECHCRAFr (ALL SII2IES)
BEECHC�tAFT 1900
HEECHC�tAFT KING AIIZ
BEECHQ2AFT QLTEEN AIR ,, - .. . . .
� GESSNA (ALL SERIES) �'' .
MCDONNF.d.LDOUGLAS.DC10, �. ,. ,.,
MC�ONNELL DOUGLAS DC8.. .
MC�ONNELL DOUGLAS DC8 STRETCH �
MC�DONNF.yL DOUGLAS DC8 60-SERRIES
Mc�orrlv�L DOUGr.As Dcs �as�s x� : _
MC�ONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 � , '
AIItBUS Ir]llUSTRI�S A320
. FOKF�it 100
FOKKEIt F28
FOKI�it F27 (PROP)
LOC� TRISTAR L1011
MC�ONNELL DOUGLAS DCl l •
MC'I)ONNII.,L DpUGLAS DC9 80-SERIES .
SW�ARIlVGEN M�'TROLINER 3
SWF.ARWGEN MF.TROLIIVER 4 � .
SAAB 340 .
, Page 9 : Aviati� Noise.& Satellibe Programs ,;. -
�
� _ Metropolitan Airports Commissia� �
, ..
Run�ay �Jse - Day/1�Tight Periods - A.11 O�erations _
Minneapolis - Ste Pau.l International Airport September 1995 �
Daytime Hours ,
� Night'me Hours
Aviatiaai Noise & Satellite Rrograms .
�
�
Page 10
� Metropolitan Airports Commission
Corninunity Overfl(ighi .�.nalysis
1Vlinneapolis - St. Paul International Airport September 1995
Carrier Jet Operations - Atl Hours
Carrier Jet Operations - Nighttime (llpm - 6 am)
Page 11 Aviatioai Noise & Satellite Programs
�
Metropolitan Air�orts Commissi� •
,.
Rerrnote 1Vionitoring Site Locations ��
Airport Noise ar�d Operations Monit�ring System
a
�
�
(�
..,..
Aviatiaai Noise'�& Satellite Erograms . ;' '
, - Page 12
� � Metropolitaa Airports Com.mission
. • • � . � • . • � � . .
-•;� . �. ��
Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each R1�IT
>>: <����>;:: �::;��<:'�: ��><::>:>�:::;`'::::::::<:::>:':>«<;::::::`:>::> :::<:>'::>`::»`:<:>� :::<':<>::'`><<;>� ;>>>�'>��€<:: ;::<::::>::� ;><�:::: ���:::>�>«`<:::>:::::::>:':::':.:;::::>: �:<>::>>::::::>:::;:':.>:<» �:�;>:;:>:``:;:::::::>:�>::::>'..`;:>::>: ::::::: �»<::;:::::::::::><:>::>::::}` ::.}{:::'`..:'::>::>:<:::::::::::«:.;,..;; ....;;;<:::::,`:>:::<:::<'::;>'<:::;:;`::
...:: .:.::.:::.::.::..:. . .. ......::::::.�:::::: ��,�#�:.:.;;:.>:.::.���n :.:.>:.::.::.:�v�n� :� :.:
:::::::�::;::> ::::::::........:><:<:>::>::;::::::>:....� :..� .�......:::.�::::::<:::::::;::::. ::� . . :..:..< .. . . .: . . . .:::.::....:.....................................�........................�.::.: ....�v r�ts....
. : . . . :: :: .:::;:..:< ::.::: :.::::::::::::::..::.�.�::::.�::::::::::.:::. ::.� :.::::::::::.�::.�.�::. :.:::.� ::.::�::::::::.:�:
>::<:::»:::: �:��: �::>::::::::::::»;>:::::::>::>::::>::>>::>:::>���: :>::<.>::>::>::::::::::>::;:::::::::< :::.. .: : :.: . . .. ... . ... . . .;�,. .. . .:::: ::.:.:::.;:.:.:::::::.:: :::..::.>:.; ;.:;.:::.>;�:.�:..:>.::::.<:.;:;..>�:::.;:::.:<.:� :.::::::::::.:.::.:.::.;::.;;:.;:.>:.::.;:;:.;:.:::
:......... . .. .........: :.......... : .:........... .::.::.::::::.::::::. :.:::�:. : : ����:���.....!�.����.:::: ::::::::: : : . . ..:.: ........ . ..... .:..:.:: . .:. . .::::: .�::.�: : . .. ...
: ;;;;:; : : . . .. : : : : : : : : : . . : : : : : : : : : >: : : : :.: : : :.: : : : : �.: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . : :.: . . . . . �! �. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :.: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :. . . . . . . . . . . . : . : . . : : :.. :.: . . : : : : . : : : : . . :. . . . :. . . . . . . . . . . . .: . . : : :
;;:�;:<,:.:�:.:.:.;>;;:;.; .>:.;>;;;;;::<.:<:;<.>:.::.:.;:.>;;>;>:<;.:�>::.:.:�:>:.::.:;>;�.;::>::.::.;;>;:;;:,;::;.>;::.::;;;>;;>:,:.;;::»;;:;::::>:;:;::,;:::;;;;»:.>;::;:.::.:;<::;>:.;:>:;. .. : . ::.;:.; .::::... � : : .;:.:.; .:..,:... .. ;:<:.;:.:;;. �:: : ,.>:
......... <.::: ::::: ..
::::.�:::::: :.:,:>;:.:;::: : .::::::::::.:::�:::::.�:::::.�::.�:::::.�.�.�::::: ::.:::.::.;;>:.:;;;:;..;;:»:.:;:.;:.>:.;;::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::.�::::::::..... .... �f�:
.......................: . ::..:............................................. ...................................::......................................:....:: :.:: ::::..:..... . �:.::.:.: ::.;;:��d�3:<:.:: .:>;;:��1!�:�:.»::> >::>��. :;:
.......................: .. ..::.::::::::::. �:: .............................. .....................................::::::::. �:: ::.:.................................. ...........:.... ::.:::::::. : :.:: .: :.... :............. ......................,..... ....::... �l.��...
. ................
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue Fc 41st Sireet 2942 70 0 0
. 2 r Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 2370 207 1 0
3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmoait Avenue 2713 1�18 - 28 0
4 Minneapolis Oalcland Avenue & 49th Street 2637 819 7 0
5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 2224 1557 364 0
6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th St�et 2111 1465 375 0
7 Richfield Wentworth Ave & 64th Sireet 191 17 1 0
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue 3c 43rd Street 331 14 0 0
9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 1(� 53 6 0
10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 298 86 23 0
11 St. Paul Finn Street 8c Scheffer Avenue 66 3 0 0
�:::��:�:>:s:::::;;�:::; ::': :r::�:;::>:::<:>':::�::: :::
;::::�::::::;::::::;�:;:;; ::>>::':::::':::::::�`�':�:><:>::>�:::::::::s:�<><:�::;:::':::::<...;;.::::::::;:>;;;,'
::<::::: .:..:>:::.>:.;:.;:.:>:.>:.:;:.;:.::.;::.:.:.>:.>:.;;:.;:.::.:>•;:.» :.;:>:<�:�;;:.::.»:::>:;::.;:.;:::;::;;>:.;�:..:.>:.::.:::::�::;<.;:.;:.:;.:::;;;: =�>:�:>�::::::>:::;>:�::�:.::.;:.::;.>:.;:>�:;
»:.>::>::::
:::::>:::::> :.. .........:. :... .:'<;:<:;::>:::'::<::::��C�:�`::::::�;:���::>':;<;'_:::::::>::::>:<:��::; �:;..:,:...;: .:.>.:.;�.::;.< �....: :�.:;:..:� .::.;..::..;,:: ;: .>:.::..:.:::..�:..>::::>:::::: ;:<::>.<::::<,. .............. .:�:>:::::<:: ............ ............�.. � . :. .:..:....
.........., ...........:.::: .:::::..................................::...::::..:::::::�t., .�€�:��t�.A, . ........ ...........:..::::::::: :..: .......................... ................::::::::::...:.....:...�............
........................... .....::::::::::..:............................... .......::: :..:�:.�:.�...::....................................:...�....... .......................:... :.::::::.�::.:.:........... ........................... ::.::.�:::.� :..............
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . .: . � . � . � : : :.. � : . � :: : : : : : : : . : : : :.: : : : : : : : : : : :.. � : : : : : : :. .:;.: .:.>:.>:.;:.::.;:.>:.::.::.;;:.::.
' 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mahican Court 69 8 0 0
14 . Eagan First Street Rt M�Kee Street 3946 82 3 1
15 Mendota Heights Culleri Slreet & Lexingtaa Avenue 506 15 1 0
16 Eagan Avalaa� Avenu� & V'�las Lane 2838 1464 6 0
17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 270 77 2 0
18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 272 53 0 0
19 Blaomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street. 35 3 0 0
20 Richfield 75th St�eet 8c 3rd Avenue 56 4 0 0
21 �nver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Sfreet 222 2 0 0
22 Inver Grwe I3eights Anne Marie Trail 1925 15 0 0
23 Mendota Heights End of Kendon Avemie 966 16 2 0
24 Eagau Chapel I.ane & Wren Lane 1564 184 55 5
Page 13 Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs
Meaopolitan Airports Commissi� �
Carrier Jet Departure Related Noise Events
. Septernber 1995
Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT (
;; .;�:�:�L��;.��.:i;.:�:�:: � €:��:;:�:':::f>'��>:::::<<�?;_�»:;'?;::::�:5>�.:<;::::�.:.:::;:<�::>::' :::>::':::::::>:;:;;:�::�j`:>�':::<':»>:�::::;<::;'>��+�:�::>''::::::;:::<:::>;::>:::: ��'�>:'::::>:::::<�<:::#::<`:>::::>:::t;:::::, :;.:::::c».::?«<:`�<`.<"r`:;:< ;<:<<''»:s:::::;:::;;;::;:;:::..:::; �.;::; � i»;:::»:;:::::::::;;>t:::::>: :::::>� �`:"';::;i:;>::>::: �:::<�::>;:
:::::::::::::: :�.:::>: <.;w:;;:;: :.:::.�:: :. a . � �.>:.;: ::>:: . . . ::. •� . ::
..:.: ;> :.<.:;;::;:::;..:•..;::.;•;::»:s:::::::::::.��'K���:.::. ::::...�,:f.'�?��1 ::.: .:.:��:it:�Ii� ::::..::::�`,. . .:::.
;;:»;;;;; :.::.:::.::.:.>:;;;«< ::.;>:�::::.;:;<.>:;.:: ::.: : :;;:.:.;;::::.;;:.�.:;; .:;.:;.: .: . . ...:... . . :...:� .: . ... .......::... ....�.... ....................�.... .........:t�: i� ....
>::»>::;::>;.t�.� �. .;;::::.>:;;;:;:.:::>:::::»:::�. : , ;: .
.........:�::: t�::::
:> :::::::::::::. :: <:>:<::>:.;:.:.:::.<::»::: �. ...... :::::>::;::::;�::>;»>:>:<:::::>::<:::<:>;::::.;:,.;;:�.:;::::»:::::<::<:,::::: :::<:::::»::::::::;:::::�:::<::<::>::<:::;:.;.:::.;:�:::::::.>:.>.�::
::.� :::::: . .....:.:� .::::::::.::�::::::::::::::.�....:::::::::.�:::..::::� : .�:..v...���::��;�::�p+����.:.�::::.�:::: . : .:...::.�:::: .: .x:::.::::.::. : .:. .::::.:..:..� .: .:...:......:::
: ......... . . . �:::::::: ..: �::: ::.:. �::::: :.: ......... �::::::::::::::::::. .::::::: :��:.:.............:.:.: �::::::::::. �: .::::::. :::.�:::::::::::::::::: .:: . .... .. .. . . . :::.: :::.: :.: . . ::::. ::::: :.. . . ...:. ::: :.:. .. .: . . ...
:;:.::.;:.;:.:�.::::::::: .�.� :::::::::::::::.:::::>:.;:.::.:.::::: :.:::::::::::...�:::::::::::.:::.:;:.::.;:.:;.::.::.;:.:::::.:,:::::::::::::.:�::::::::.�:::::::::.�:::::::::.:::.:.:;::.. � . .. . : .::::. ::::.. . . . .::::. ::::. .. :.;;:.: ..�. ..: . . :.:;
:<.�:::::::::.�:::;;.:;:>:>: :.;:.;::::»:>:;.::.;>:::;:::::.:�::>:;.:::..>:;;:.;:.;::.:;::;:.;:.:;::.:;;:.;:�::.::.::::.�.�::::.�::>:>::.:::.:;:;.:>:::::.::.;::.;;:.:;::::::.::;:<.:;;:;:;:.:::.:::� .<.::.: .::.;:.. . . . .::::. .:::::. ,..: ::::: :;;:. : : . . .:.::
.::::::.�.:::� : ::.:::::::. :..................:.::::::::.�::.:�::: :......... ...........................:�:.�..:::::::::.�:::::::::::.::...::...................... .......: fi,�:�:.::: .::::���..... .....����..:::: :::���1 ...
.......................... :::::.�:..:...........................:..:�:.�.::.:.�::.....................................................::.�..::::::::::::.:........ ........................... .........:::.::::::::::... ........................... ............ ��...
................ ........................... .......:..::::::::::.: �:. �
1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street 729 113 1 0
2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue �& 43rd Strcet 1006 313 2 0
3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Stneet & Belm�t Avenue 2246 4b8 °� 34 1
4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 3120 952 172 13
5 Minneapolis • 12th Avenue & 58th Street 3234 1489 684 179
6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Sireet 3010 1668 831 251
7 Richfield Wentworth Ave & 64th Street 1668 568 77 1
8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 759 384 44 2
9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 44 4 0 0
10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street - 87 20 14 1
, .
11 St. Paul Finn Street &. Scheffer Avenue 72 21 1 0
<<:;1�2<:::��:'`<�:�:�� :�:
.,..,`},',.:::.. :.,..`..;.: :....:.,.
: : : : :.: : . : : : : : � :;.::.::.;:.: � .::>:.::.;:.;: :.: :.>:.: ;:.;:::::>:
::::::::. :::.:.::::: ..:.. . ..;:......... .::.::.:::.:;:.;:.;:.>:..<:;>:;:.;:.:::.::.>;;.;:::.:::<:>;:.:;.:;::.::,:;:::.:;.::.:;:.:::.;.::. ;:: ;.::.;�:.:;::<.>;::.;::;:::;;.. :.
.:�:.�:.: ::.::::::.:::.:: .:::: :::::::: .::.;:: .......... . . .
:::::::.. .:. . ....... . .:::.:. .:. ::.::.:.
........ .:.::::::::..:.:.: :... .::.:.;::.::;: ;�
. .:.. .
.......:..:.�:.:::. .
: .::.�:::::.::::::,:::;. ::::�::�>_:�;:��:
.:::::::.�:.::. :: ........ .
.;.::.;::.; : .........::.. . . �t:�::::>::::;:: . ;,.. � �:� ::; . . . . . �. . .: . .. ... . ..:::..; :::�:<::_<>::>::»::: <:
::::> �:::>:: � � �::::; : : <: ':
:::::::. .... ........... ...........................
:::..::. :::::::::::::::::::::::::...�.�:::::::::::::::::::.::.
...... .:� :::: :.:::......:...
: . .: . . . . .: :.:>:.;:.>:.: :. �: . .. : :..
. . ..................:::.�:...
. :::::::.:.� :: .::......::::
:::::,.; ........ ::.:.�.: :: .;:.;:.;:.�.:�:.: :::;:.;:�:.::.:
... ....... ... .€.�. ::::.::.:.�.,:.::.>:.::............... .:: ::.::....... . .:::::::::::�;::°::;::::::::: .. .
:...... �.��+�..�,t� ...... .......................... ................................. .........:�............
. ............................................::,::::::.�:::...�:::::::.:�::: ::.::.�.�::. ::::;::.>:.;:.;:.:;:<.::.::.:;.:.::.: :.:.::.:.::�:.:.::.::.::.;:.::;.::<:::::> ::>:::::<:::::::�::>::>::»:::::::»<
13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Mohican Court 411 279 21 0
14 Eagan First Street & McKse Strcet 3125 874 79 8
15 . Mendota Heights Cullen S�eet & Leacingtaa Aven�e 2529 1015 109 2
16 � Eagan Avalaai Avenue & V'�las Lane 4032 1791 381 22
17 Bloomington 84th Street & 4th Avenue 463 77 18 1�
18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 582 . 330 116 7
19 Bloomingtun 16th Avenue & 84th Street 332 134 78 7
20 Richfield 75th Strcet & 3rd Avenue 415 52 8 2
21 inver Crrove Heights Harbara Avenue & 67th Street 1236 . 190 1 0
22 Inver Grove I%ights Anne Marie Trail 1446 290 0 0
23 Mendota Heights End of Kendon Avenue 4252 2095 972 106
� �8� Chapel Lane & Wren Lane � 966 68 23 4
Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 14
• Metropolitan Airports Commission
� � Ten Loud.est t�ia�c�-ait l�Toise Events Identifiecl
�' )
;� )
�
RMT #l: Xerxes Ave. & 41st S�
Minneapotis
RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave.
Minneapolis
RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St.
Minnea.Qolis
RMT #.4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St.
Minneapolis
Page 15 Aviatio�n Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airparts Commissioai �.
Ten I�oud.est t�.�rcraft I�Toise Events Identified �
RMT #5: 12th Ave. & 58th S� � : RMT #6: 25th Ave. & S7th St. (
Minneapolis
Minneapolis
RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. R1VdT #8: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St.
Richfield
Minneapolis
Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs
��
Page 16
^ Metropolitan A.irports Commission
, � �. . �, , . �. ..�
, , ,
RMT #9: Saratoga S� & Hartford Ave.
St. Paul
RMT #ll: �inn St. & Scheffer Ave.
St. Paul
RMT #10: Itasc� Ave. & Bowdoin St.
S� Paul
I2MT #12: Alton St. & Rockwood Ave.
S� Paul
Page 17 Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commission :
`, � � • . � �, . , �. ,�,
RMT #13: Southeast End pf Mohican Court
Mendota Heights
RMT #15: Cullon St. & Le�ngton Ave.
Mendota Heights
RMT #14: ls� S� & McKee S�
Eagan
RMT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane
Eagan
Aviatiaai Noise & Satellite Programs
�
�
�;
Page 1$
' Metropolitan Airports Commission , � .
Ten I.oudest Aircraft Noise Events Id.entifiied � �
6'
RMT #17: �4th St. & 4th Ave.
Bloomington �
RMT #19: 16th Ave. & 84th St.
Bloomington
RMT #18: 7Sth St. & 17th Ave. .
Richfield
,
R1VIT #20: �5th S� & 3rd Ave.
Richfield .
Page 19 Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs
Metropolitan Airports Commissi� . +
' 1 1 ;' ' i ' • 1 ` • • 1
.
RMT #21i Barbara Ave. & 67th St.
Inver Grove Heights �
RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave.
Mendota Heigtits
RMT #22: A�nne Marie Trail
Inver Grove FIeights
RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln.
Eagan
Aviatia�n Noise & Satellite Programs
C
�
�
Page 20
` M01TOpOI1tSII AlIpOItS COII1tII1SS10II ,
��l��lt �'�'�C� �iaS� ��'D
' Airport Noise and Uperations 1V�onito�ing �ysterr�
,;
� .
A
� �
f
Page 21
r
i
Aviatio� Noise & Satellite Pro$rams
' :�\�.� .�:\
%i.ti��i �,
��'.•'
� yW : •:
�"-�.��� v � y':
�.� . .. .:;, : .� .ii..
� �; � � � � �'c�.>.. ' " - -
�'`- ��',•\ � ,'�' ' ^
r� .. ':
�� �• ��� �.�:'
\. ����V�� - '
a
�\ , 1v s��i
�� �
�� � ., �
..;`� .,_+c,
� .._ _
� . ; \� ""�t7,/R
� �a�-��
"'' ..� I
�� ,��• _
�
,� -
����� d
�:� a �
. �� `�� ��
-- — — ' .< .—.�'�� j.�.. �
"., �` '�'-,.w�,
. 1 �/�►`"'�'i►�►i: '
� ~'�`i.''�\O�'
. i�v
. . ' % b f .�:a� \
. . � � � . . . , a� � v�`i: ►.
. K'��.
. ' � ''^� r ,,,,_ .:�.:
r �
� / � %�i� r'��',.. �. . !�' t � .,�j �'
• � : %t��xO � . 1 ♦ /! ✓ ,
�. 4b,�.u► � r
�,, r .
. � -�\�1i�'. �,io`�' 'v ,'�.� �.
. - �.+i. ���
- �, :
, � �y, ` _ .
� ,�4 ��.��� ' '� �,
•'__i �V\�� • .n �
►".�►�`ra��►�.:. � • �;%!
���1► o�,
��, �• p
it1 ���
�iA�►-"�'� ♦ �r .� '
� ' \`� � .
��.
�,�. ':�'fi�`.�. ` .
.:y � � -
�::\�� � `� � . • _ '
!\a\\�`` ,� _ -
` �\� ..�� � w
\ �aa� `\..,��� , , .
� �
:�� �`��,''��.;� s-w:
' �.,� ``"\` �`h, ::
. � � ��� ;^\'� .
.' ' '
� "� � � :.
�� � ,R g.�Yd '�. =.
' :�� ��\ � � � , '� � ��;
```�.��" � . `V ''
% ..� " � :�'
I Mi
►-�i_ — �p� � •
i
�-.-� ; _ � �.,,�,, �,�..,: �:
,,.n ,:. �_.,,,--��•;//..�',
: . fr`,�� � �,..�rli: • �
�"
j : /i�/������ \
� t��l+�///���... 1f%����\ .
.'� i � ' �� ��� �,�; �\��,\�
1 �
. R � ; ✓/% . �,��,;•=�Y\`, .
�\. ��� �
.
,.; , .
;'. . . . .. .
'• \,�
•�� `\\`�\��
� • �::��.•� :.: �. �o`�
.\
. . . ._ . . .. . . . . .. .. .. . . . . . . .
!1 �.
` \..� ��\: _ . .
�� �,��jj.+�P �-�:
; �� �`�� �I��
�...��•!����n /...s
. ,,,,.,��r...,;R, /,_ „r,
— ---- �`!�1.!_4 ,�r%:
_ _ `. _ . � ___ '
. � :"!�v—.,;�� �. . ; ::..�
..,,;,,..
� w�%�„�.i�►�'.��
�!;':►`.�`rs��i_,.
:; � .e�"
. i� I � ♦ �,.,, ���.s
d til .. � �� �
lR --
� . .. � �,�!4wvi :
. '�ui�„"
, i ,b11���
a ,%I��i ��i ,.r
�ry//i:, i%l� � : r r ,:�i .
� Fw-► �,�,.. � _ :
: ,.-- �� '
. :-w►-.�.- �' i� . ..� ��
.. . �:r ��� .
� � ' �..�. _ '
ii 1
. ".. . : ;l � _
� * � .
�` � �� � . . p � �/.�'jI � f ..
���.�'ww'� � /�'��p �
►'r.�.�•��•syM "�.� .. `.%;/ � �.':.�`
�I.I}�i"... R1, `\!\ . N � �' � F
► ������w� ... �1 t
'a.���\\\ ��� '. J 1 ,��''
r \ � ' ,
i�• ', �i � 1 r . ,y,� .
�►'''/-'�e��.���`��.` �95i��Mi;.,. _.. �.�
, � \� : ���• : _ : .
�.. - . ;�.. � � _ '.:4 •.
� �,� "�,��., ` '
\ ��` ;
r.
� � ` `�\�'�� .
�
`M� ` `\
.,�\�.r, ``�+ -
�.� ��\ �. `� ,t�, .,��
.
�`�-� ��R��Q`7Bi :�.� � . ',��
; ��,,, ` � Z. . �
►��-'�-�-: � \'� ; ` \`'��•
= �-.-.� �.,...,� ' � � � ".�
'=�==';- ;:�..,_ � ,.� ;
-.� -' �����b���,'�''`
�.�I�i::~ - - ` �--�f„\. �,� «,' •►,.
16. iaw.,... � !�.- � i ':
�i ._ �<,,,� . ,,,� . i:
u, . :
, � �` �
. , .� .... �
;�J�+�,�/A�•���jy,`\�'9d.\D <
� . . � �♦�� �.i.w�i��\� ���
' � � �:^�i��/�i�a�A�", ,F� .
. , . '•,' ` ���:'f • �
�ti ���'�;; . w. '` `~ .
a !�:"a+
.� ',��,�
. � . . �..' �. .
Metropolitan Airports Commi�sion ;
� , �; , . , � .. .. . , ; �; � `� •
.,� , �. � ', . � . �. ( 1i
Noise Monitor Locations
'>:�:>S��tl:�::;:::::�`: :::'::;<::�.�J>�:�:�:::i:�' �:�;:<:{`..'...���.�:::::<`::<:;::::''.:'�:��::::::::'':;;:::<:>"#�'','R�':::::::::<::;>;;::':�`.'C�.`::<:::;::.>`�:::::"`�'..��°��>:�5:':;::<�::''.o»:::;::;:;; :>:,::;;#:.xj:Q��:�:.:>:;::: :::::>:_:":';{":::>:::::�::::::::>.:;.;<:::/>�:::y;.:;: ::a..::::::::;;�i�1:::;<.::.: ;:'::��,x/;.::_`:::�.:::y:::;
:::::::::::::::::::::•:::::. 7T...... . �� ��.::::: :::: :T�,Mr.::::: .�:::�:7::::.: :::::�:.::>::.:.:>:;�.::;:;. :::::71.�i. � ���i �Jl :.:7t..•��.::.:
1 56.5 59.0 65.7 69.1 77.7 80.9 66.0 62.3 54.7 57.7 55.2 *
2 55.9 59.7 • 60.9 69.9 76.2 80.0 64.5 62.5 49.7 * 55.3 *
3 49.9 54.1 57.6 5�.2 64.7 65.3 28.4 48.1 57.0 52.3 51.7 . *
q, � * * * � * * * * * � *
5 57.7 60.3 65.4 64.8 71.7 71.6 53.8 57.3 66.9 61.5 � 57.3 •*
6 55.'7 58.6 61.7 68.6 76.8 81.0 67.2 63.4 * 69.0 55.9 �
� 60.1 62.2 64.2 65.8 * 75.2 63.5 59.1 55.7 71.1 61.2 *
'$ 57.9 . 59.1 60.9 68.3 * 79.0 67.1 65.3 625 54.0 52.3 *
9 55.2 * � 61.0 69.4 69.1 58.4 54.8 * 48.7 45.6 *
10 - 54.7 58.1 62.6 62.0 68.0 69.2 41.5 51.5 63.3 68.9 57.3 *
11 58.9 59.2 65.1 66,4 71.4 71.2 SSS 59S 53.9 60.9 51.9 *
12 57.3 61.1 66.8 6'7.7 78.0 79.2 65.1 63.2 SOS 56.3 579 *
13 56.0 58.0 62.5 65.3 �2.8 '76.4 65.3 59.5 * 53.7 43.3 . *
14 59.9 59.9 65.7 69.5 78.9 79.8 69.4 66.1 57.6 64.2 44.3 *
15 60.4 62.'7 68.8 68.0 74.1 73.8 53.6 62.9 59.6 66.4 56.3 *
16 56.2 58.1 65.4 67.2 77.8 78.5 69.3 61.1 52.2 65.0 43.2 *
17 � 56.0 58S 64.9 63.9 71.9 71.9 56.9 51.2 43.6 46.4 43.2 *
18 57.'7 62.0� * 63.7 70.9 70S 45.9 51.3 64:0 � 66.6 * *
19 58.5 60:3 64.9 69.2 77.5 79.7 68.9 62.7 * 52.0 52.5 *
20 59.7 59.7 63.0 67.1 '77.6 79.9 69.6 65.1 * 50A 49.9 *
21 61.0 60.4 63.3 67.2 78.0 80.4 �1.0 64.6 * 52.9 47.1 *
22 573 58.3 62.8 66.7 76.4 79.9 65.9 6�.3 * 58.8 48.0 *
23 58.1 61.1 65.1 64.2 70.6 71.9 43.9 60.6 48.3 60.'7 53.5 *
24 59.8 60.9 66.6 64.2 71.9 71.4 46.3 56.4 42.6 59.4 55.0 *
25 58.9 61.2 66.0 69.2 75.8 80.4 65.3 58.3 48.3 � 54.8 53.9 *
26 59.2 61.6 65S � 68.8 � 77.1 79.'7 679 63.1 431 � 55.3 47A *
2� 60.'7 61.1 64.0 65S 75.3 76.1 60.7. 58.9 53.7 60.4 46.2 *
28 * 61.6 66.6 65.4 72.5 74.1 58.2 S9S 47.8 61.7 52.4 *
29 .62.5 64.3 67.'7 67S . 72.8 74:2 52.2 60.8 66.9 69.4 57.0 *
30 60.0 61.2 68,2 67.5 74.5 76.5 50.1 57.4 52.8 60.4 50.7 *
Mo. Ldn 59.6 60.9 65.3 67.5 75.4 77.6 65.2 62.4 64.6 64.8 54.6 *
* Less �hars twenty four hours of data available
�,.
Aviatia�n Noise & Satellite Programs Page 26
Metropolitan Airports Comm.ission
A.nalysis oi Aircraft Noise Events - Aircrait I,dn d�(A)
September Ol to September 30,1995
�� Noise Monitor Locations
:;r><:����cR�i>?:i:. ;:':;��`>.:�:<::<::;;.?:.: �.?:,.;.;.:}:::�:;.::;;:>:.:..>:: >:::�`::`.: ;�:.:`....;. '�.....;:::`�.':�;;'�;::;.:?';;;:;:::>::2>:;;;::; �::«:<`:;><:.(>�7:;r...;:;; .:;;>�;:}::>::>;>:::,::< .:: :::::::::::<:�::::»:.:;; .:':;..»<r.�._.<<:;j::y.:;:,.y,:;<>:«.:i>::� ;::>::<:::>r:><>;.;.,;;'.;;.;::::�:+.�<:.:»:;:<>:
i::;::::i::;i:::: �� 7F�� ��� ��� ��� ��.i 3T�� ��� �� �� �� �ii'/�
..... ..................
1 45.7 63.1 54.5 66.8 63.8 71.9 73.5 56.9 54.6 57.0 59.6 71.3
2 56.3 65.7 ° 57.9 68.4 61.8 70.1 67.0 55.1 � 54.3 58.5 61.9 70.1
3 SS.4 65.7 58.8 66.6 53.7 65.1 � 67.3 44.5 � 56.7 56.9 68.9 67.8
4 * * * * * * * * * * * *
5 65.7 67.4 66.8 '70.3 54.5 52.7 46.2 47.4 612 61.7 76.4 �� 70.5
6 52.0 * 56.2 67.3 64.0 74.3 73.7 62.5 46.5 55.9 60.3 *
7 61.9 69.6 65.3 74.2 68.9 67.2 53.9 48S 59.2 * '74.3 66.8 ,
$ 59.7 70.4 60.9 70.0 62.8 71.0 70.6 60.4 57.8 * 71.2 '70.4
� 9. 60.4 70.5 64.7 74.4 64.1 70.7 69.7 54.7 62.1 619 73.4 69.2
10 63S 68.9 66.6 72S 67.1 72.9 69.5 54.6 61.9 62.3 75.4 61.6
11 64.5 70.5 66.9 72.4 46.1 51.6 43.0 44.'7 64.6 62.3 75.7 67.5
12 62.7 64.9 64.8 69.9 58.9 70.8 66.6 61.5 59.1 58.6 72.6 55.9
13 * .58.9 51.6 65.4 55.4 66.8 71.0 53.1 43.4 52.5 56.6 62.8
14 59.6 66.4 60.9 69.8 55.5 61.0 53.2 52.2 59.7 59.2 71.0 67.4
15 6'7.3 67S 69.7 70.0 55.4 67.5 54.2 53.7 59.8 � 60S 75.9 62:8
16 46.2 62.9 52.0 69.1 55.0 70.3 62.7 64.2 55.3 5'7.3 59.0 60.8
17 61.0 68.0 63.4 '72.6 63.8 72.9 72.1 59.2 58.3 58.9 73.7 63.2
18 66.0 70.0 67.9 70.1 49.4 57.4. 48.8 46.4 62.3 62.4 76.5 70.3
19 55.8 64.4 60.0 74.1 52.2 56.4 49.9 50.3 52.0 58.3 68.9 64.6
20 65.3 67.0 55.8 70.? 64.7 70.7 68.5 56.7 52.1 58.5 56.5 64.0
21 51.1 67.1 58.5 70.4 67.6 71.0 72.7 62.7 50.6 61.2 60.6 67.3
22 60.7 66S 63.1 70.1 67.1 68.9 71S 53.1 62.0 62.1 71.0 66.9
� 23 65.9 70S 69.7 73.0 52.4 51.3 47.0 45.8 62.9 64.5 75.4 67.3
24 66.2 70.9 69.6 73.9 61.6 59.3 49.9 43.2 63.4 63.7 77.6 69.1
25 61.8 65.3 64.2 71.7 51.8 64.0 59S 52.1 602 61.0 73.4 60.7
26 58.4 63.2 58.6 67.3., 58.4 67.1 67.4 57S 57.9 57.7 69.4 65.7
27 62.7 66.0 64.1 69.7 57.0 67.6 56.9 59.2 61.0 59.5 74.3 58.8
28 68.8 68.6 70.9 73.0 49.0 53.4 42.9 47.0 65.1 62.0 77.6 63.8
29 67.4 68.1 69.3 71.0 55.2 73.2 63.5 712 63.2 62.1 * 64.7
30 66.3 68.6 68.8 70.8 49.8 60.1 54.4 53.3 60.9 61.5. 76.1 61.6
Mo. Ldn 63.7 69.8 66.1 71.4 62.8 69.2 68.1 60.2 61.3 61.9 73.8 70.1
* Less than nveruy four hours of da�a available
Page 27 Aviatio�n Noise & Satellite Programs .
.;
:
i
�
s
( '
. _:: � ,..
. _ ... . � .
c'i
,� nn'�ivTE�7
IVIASAC OPERATIONS COMMITfEE �
. OCTOBER 12, 1995
The meeting was held at the Metropolitan Airports Commission Generai O�ce Boardroom, and
cailed to order at 1:35 p.m. �. .
The rfollowing members were in attendance:
r. _
Mark Salmen, NWA - Chairman (Jennifer Sayre, NWA - aiternate)
Bob Johnson - MBAA � `
John Neison = Bloomington
Tom Hueg - St. Paul
Dick Keinz - MAC
Mayor Mertensotto - Mendota Heights (Tom Laweli, Mendota Heights - aiternate) �
Jon Hohe�stein - Eagan �
A vi o _.
t John Foggia - Technical Advisor .�
Ray Fuhrmann - MAC .
Traci Erickson - MAC •
.. Bruce Wagoner - FAA �
. .:; � Cindy Greene - FAA �
� �� -
l f ` A G E,IV �/! s i � y,S s ` y i , "
.
;'� ' ,..:. _ .,• , ,,'.. . � .�l_ ?�
. ,: . . �
,.. ;. ^
:i. : •:; :
. .- ". '�
'y ,
�. . ., . .�.
. _ : , ' C of Ea an Re uest . , � • � ; � .�
, �Y 9 q ,�. : . , , ,,:�
. .. > .... .
� � ' � � . ; Contour Generetion Status ..:
� :: , . . _ ,.
,
. , _
� , . Hawthor�e Waods Monitoring. , ,;;,, > �:
. .; Shoulder. Hour:Data � � ;
. _ " Discussion .
_ * Expectations ` : , �
, Correspondence Direc#ed to Operations Committee ��
" Portland Avenue Coalition �
NADP Status .
'` Correspondence-Northern Dakota County Airport. Relations Coalition
' * Discussion .
, . : � -- �� .�. ;, �. ; .*Expectations : ., . .
. _ . ; . ..
. _. .. ,:.
Chairman Salmen called the meeting to order at 9:35 a.m. Report handouts were distributed for �
eacti agenda item and are attached to the minutes for refe�ence. ._ .
City of Eagan Request . . - . .
, :,. ._. . . , . . .. . . �: :. , �.
,_
The City ;of: Eagan requested ANOMS analysis of jet departures off Runways ,11 UR over <the. -:
weekends: of April 20 and .30; 1995, , and May 6 and 7; 1995 r:;; - ;;� �
.( j . .�
1 .
; . ' � -
., ;, . , , ;. . ;
:. , , , .: ; ,
�
Additional analysis through the same Hawthorne Woods neighborhood "gate" was done previousiy
for a variety of citizen requests, and presented at the Eagan City Halt 12-13-9A�. This information �
was also presented to a citizens group in Eagan on 8-16-95. For comparison, all analysis time
periods are compiled into Table 1(attached).
John Foggia repo�ted that the nature of operations has not changed. Additionally, the FAA
procedures staff does not. anticipate any airspace changes. Aircraft procedures occurring southeast
of the field have not changed, however, volume of total airport traffic has increased between June
1993 and 1994 and the total traffic within the Corrido� is up.
Cindy Greene, FAA, �eported that Min�eapolis Center airspace had some realigr�ment of arrival and
departure sectors. This realignment affects traffic within approximately 40 miles ouY of M�.P
[compared to 30 - 35 miles before September 1995]. The additional 6 miles equates to about 50%
more "all-around" airspace which allows jet aircraft to arrive at a higher altitude of 11,000 feet
instead of 9,000 to 10,000 feet. There were not any operating procedure changes below 8,000 feet.
Contour Generation Status
HNTB's report on the contour analysis indicates that shifting non-simultaneous Runway 11 �
departures to runway heading can be accomplished with no significant degradation to overall noise
levels in noise sensitive areas southeast of the airpo�t. (Refer to the attached contour status, and
the letter from Evan Futterman of HNTB.) �
MAC staff will push for immediate implementation of the "corridor crossing" procedure.
Arrangements of a conference call between FAA's Great Lakes Regional Office, MAC, HNTB, and
local FAA have delayed movement on the issue due to schedule cpnflicts with one or more
conference call parties. Another conference call attempt is pending for the week of October 16. (
John Foggia reported that the Base Case contour for 4994 is still pending comment by the FAA,
has not yet been released or approved by MAC in any document, and will not be distributed or
released in an official manner until approved and published. A� discussion followed.
Noise Abatement Departure Profile (NADP) contour analysis funding has been approved and the
work is in process. HNTB's proposal far analysis is attached. The proposed workscope will satisfy
the NADP Advisory Circular and the questions raised by this committee.
Task 1 Evaluatis�n of single departure events for select
airc�aft from the current fleet mix at MSP.
Task 2 Evaluation of DNL contours using various
combinations of noise abatement departure
procedures based on the agreed upon 1994 aircraft
operations at MSP (a combination of tower and
MAC ANOMS data).
HAWTHORNE WOODS MONITORING
A request for monitoring was received by the city of Eagan and was referred by MASAC to the
Operations Committee. The committee requested a noise monitor be temporarily placed at
Pinewood Elementary School, Hawthorne Woods neighborhood in Eagan. Thi�ty-eight select days
�
of data were collected during June, July, August and September 1995. The attached comparison
T�bie 2 shows noise events g�eater than 85 dBA and 80 dBA during the same time periods for
Eagan-Hawthorne Woods, Eagan-Highview RMT 16, and Mendota Heights-Furlong RMT 23. The
figures reflect the effect of distance from the airport on magnitude of noise events. Hawthorne
Woods had 20 noise events greater than 85 DBA, compared to Mendota Heights-Furlong with
2,123 events. �
"SHOULDER" HOUR DATA ANALYSIS
r
The Operations Committee had previously asked fo� a number of analysis items including a
representative sample of nighttime operations [a variety af "slices" on the shouldre� hours which are
defined as 10 - 11 p.m. and 6- 7 a.m.]. MAC staff sampled ANOMS operations from Octob.�r
1994, January, Ap�il, and July 1995. Selec�ion from each calendar quarter eliminated seasonal
biases affecting operations at MSP. John Foggia reviewed the attached report summary which
� includes analysis of operations by hour, by 15-minute increments, and a Stage 2/Stage 3 split by
. nighttime hour. A discussion session foilowed. '
Economic impact of shouider hour restrictions will be examined by the committee at'upcoming
meetings. Airlines cannot ultimately [precisely] control scheduled . operations due to delays in the .
system. Data shows a decline of ave�age operations per night between 10:30 p.m. to 11:00 p:m.
Currently, there are minimal operations at MSP during the shoulde� hours. if the Airlines are not
. allowed to provide service, there will not be a viabie east.coast operation and it will cause an ;
economic impact in the area: Based on the location of Minneapolis in relation to the rest of the Hub
airports in the United States, there are already minimal, operations during these hours. � Currently ;
- MSP has a loan covenant with NWA where they agree to� schedule and fly only Stage 3 aircraft ;���
,: between 11 a.m. - 6a.m. MAC hasa voluntary agreement in place with six nighttime.carriers:.to 1�.;: ��.. .,..
� ':' fly Stage 3 aircraft only, befinreen'11-6 :�Non-participating�carrie�s�`will be�encouraged.to:simila� t._�-� ��:.�'_-
'� agreements using �the ;NNMM (New Noise Management Methodology) as a�veh�cle for such �``� '
agreement.' : , _ }
�
;�- An educational presentation ,including a sunrey of other airports will be given �by :staff: which �will �... -�
consider: expansion of Stage 3 use,` expansion of: carriers under voluntary agreement; scheduled � j �': F
versus actual operations, runway use considerations by arrivals and departures, impacts on ai�lines; -
constraints at other airports, other airpo�t alternatives, noise impact on '"the surrounding
,• communities, and potential procedures�hat could be implemented during 10 p.m: to 11 p.m. and -:
6 a.m. to 7 a.m. during 15-minute intenrals.
Ct3RRESPONDENCE DIRECTED TO OPERATIONS COMMITfEE -
Chairman Salmen pointed out that, with all the new neighborhood groups writing their complaints °
to MASAC as separate entities, i� is not an efficient way for the Operatians Committee to deal with
noise problems. Members suggested that MASAC forward this correspondence to staff who will
forward the applicable information, and also notify them of MASAC meeting dates so they can �
appear on the public forum; and give' them the name of the appropriate �:�MASAC community •
•member to contact. �
Portland Avenue Neighborhood - St Paui complained of nighttime landings between 3:30 a.m. -
5:00 a.m., asking that the flights be directed away from this area. � �
Tom Hueg, St. Paul, agresd to meeting with the neighborhood group to explain ope�ations at MSP,
the RUS and the function and purpose of MASAC. �
Northern Dakota Count�Airport Relatic�ns Caalition asked Northwest Ai�lines to revisit the
assumptions on which the proposed NADPs both distant and close-in procedures were designed,
and�that the Coalition be involved in the review process.
Chairman Salmen conveyed that the Coalition [cities of Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Mendota,
Mendota Heights, Sunfish Lake] has su�cient representation at MASAC for input �egarding �he
NADPs. •
NADPs cannot be specific to MSP - they must be uniform throughout the U.S. The advisory
circular was issued because there was a safety concern. It set guidelines on both distant and
close-in procedures. These were analyzed for both safety and noise impacts. Procedures were
then developed for each specific aircraft. This committee will technically analyze which procedure
will be best used at MSP, but the airport authority makes the final decision. Currently the Distant
pro�edure is being used on all runways, which seems to be most beneficial.
There will be a complete response to this letter, but at this time, we are still in the information-
gathering phase. A preliminary response on the NADPs will be presented at the Operations
Committee and then at MASAC. '
The next Operations Committee meeting will be scheduled in November.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted:
Jean Deighton
Committee Secretary
�
C
4 � �
. ��� .���� ...,� � . . �
iV1EBVL�O'i'/� i-iEif�iil'� AIRPOR�
RELATIOIVS COMMiSS10N
SEEKS NEW MEMBER
9
October 19, 1995
For more information, contact:
Tom Lawell, City Ad�ninistrator
452-1850 � •
Are you concerned about the impact the Minneapolis/St. Paul international
Airport has on our community. Is aircraft noise disruptive to your family's
lifestyle. If so, you may wish to become involved in ihe Mendota Heights Airport
Relations Commission. The Mayor and City Council are requesting letters of
interest from those interested in filiing one vacancy on the Commission. The
Commission meets monthly and has as its duties:
1.
2.
3.
Advise the City Council on matters pertaining to airport noise and
operations at Minneapolis/St. Paui International Airport.
Monitor propased rules, procedures and programs which impact the
air noise situation within the City.
Make recommendation to the City Council regarding strategies to
mitigate the City's air noise exposure.
In addition, the Commission is also expected to deai with non-noise related
airport matters, inciuding the State's Dual Track Airport Planning Process which
may. culminate in a decision to relocate the airport at some point in the future.
.
s
1 � • ✓
. Service on the Commission is voluntary and no compensation is provided.
Residents are asked to submit letters of interest in serving on the Commission no �
later than 3:00 P.M. on November 16, 1995. �etters should be addressed and
mailed to Mayor Charles Mertensotto, Mendota Heights City Hall, 1101 Victoria
r
Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118, or may be dropped off at City Hall in person.
r
,
###
a
C
e� o e„o e"e,,,"'""e e, e"o a e' o"�,"""� �� t„' e„e"' e, e' 1' e' �, o, o'r"i �"
' — OC'TOBER 1995
ISSUE 23
• � � � �r+�syt�i � � .:, ,.
. •'la P kr �y, ( � \ G ,.i:e��y� #,'� w� n
. 1 W ' � d . k+V1�Y
i
�' � � W� ,�n i., \ C'
� . �S¢, �� \ \�ry1i`2}aJ'�'J`����� �\:.n 15..�,
i .{ � . ' . ,� � * r'�����4 �\��� } , .
+k�`j� ���
. .1 ' .O . . , �y, �•\ " µ � 4•�. �` S
i� t � � �
. . I ( . . . . . . " ; � � \ � ��� ` nr . ..
.
. �wM�
: .' ' M' .., . �'�„"l''t G 4'
•. .
� .
°'C��
.. .'.�, u.�.��.a.
1: ,
�� . . . . .:�?... . .i`. ..
. , .,. . � � 9' d�``` � {.4 ��. �ilh.,
. . . , a1 �Hrt,"fi . } � y�, � �
�
� �� . . . . .. . .
. . � ::. , . . r. . ... . � . . -. � � �H. ' . , nl`.p4.
. Demolition contract began see related story below.
�ees�aeiee�ee�e����aaa�a��eoe�a�ese�eee�eeevaAoo�aOeeaooea�e�a�a����o��oaa���
PHASE I: DEI1ROLiTION CONTRACT explored for that particular home. Prior to
-.:. BEGINS , demolition; Veit & Company will have a salvage
, ;,...;,, , company inspect each home, and salvage such items
� �.; .Asbestos Abatement as appliances in good repair, solid core doors,
� The asbestos abatement process began on October 9, windows, oak trim, kitchen cabinets, plumbing
1995, and was cornpleted on October 27, 1995. A fixtures, furnaces and water heaters. A plumbing
• total of fifty five (55) homes, have had some form of contractor has also been hired by Veit & Company
i
asbestos abatement performed to disconnect the sewer and water lines at the curb.
The.. overall ;.aznount of asbestos that required During the entire dernolition process, the area
abatement was .minimal. The majority o£ asbestos sunounding each home will be restricted, and no
' found, wa's from floor ritle, linoleum and ceiling tile, unaufhorized people will be allowed into the work
A small,amount of pipe insulation wrap was found, area, for strict safety purposes.
wluch could have the potential to be hazardous if �
� not:properly handled. There were only. two of the Veit & Company expects to demolish seven houses
�fty-five homes that had asbestos exterior siding each day. It takes approximately one hatf-hour to
(transite); which had to be stripped off atid disposed demolish a house, anc�� a hour to ciean up the area
� of properly ,� , after. The basements will be left and filled in,
, Y, „.�. r,,,,�,, similaz to the auction lots.
The safety,of those homeownars still residing in the
,' neighborhood is the number one priority of MAC Demolition work will occur between the hours of
and WDSCO. Therefore, all federal, state, and local 7:00 am. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Saturday.
laws and regulaiions govemin$ the abatement of MAC and WDSCO would like to thank alI
asbestos has been strictly followed. . , homeowners and tenants still residing in the
neighborhood for their patience through this entire
� EnviroBate, the contractor chosen to complete this process.
woik, is,a highly reputable company that specializes �
in residential asbestos. abatement. Each home, was PHASE II: ACQUISTTION AND
required, to haye final air checks. to � assure. that no RELOCATIOiK
; asbestos fibers are remairiing inside the home.
, i� , � Closing Update:
`J �' ,`, 1Demolition ; The acquisition closing process for those
The demolihon process began on Thursday, October homeowners in Phase II is now 93% complete as of
. 26, 199S, for the remaining homes located in Phase this Ocfober issue of the Buyout Update. As of
; I which could not be sold at auction. Every effort October 30, 1995, there has been a total of 65
was made to suction each house once it was acquisirion closings conducted. Due to the near
� vacated. ,_There were a total of 145 homes acquired completion of the acquisition closing process for this
in Phase I; from that total, oniy 66 homes remained phase, this October issue of the Buyout Update will
' unsold through the auction process. The demolition be the last issue to report the Phase II acquisirion
is scheduled to be completed by the second week of closing status.
: November with some final grading to be completed' ,, •
in the early spring of 1996. ' The relocation closing process is now 84%
. complete, with a total of 59 Phase II homeowners
, A: decision is mada to schedule a home for who have closed on their relocarion homes. The
'. demolition;' only after every option has been entire relocation process for each homeowner may
* * * .
%' The Part 150 Buyout Update is a newsletter by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and W.D.
Schock Company, Inc., containing informarion on the MSP Land Acquisition and Relocation
Projects.
be completed in as short as one months rime, or as
- long as six months rime, from the actual� acquisition
closing, depending on the individual needs of each
homeowner. Due to this extended rime frame,
WDSCO wiil continue to report the relocation
closing status in each future issue of the Buyout
Update, until the relocarion process is near 100%
completion.
As of Octqber 30, 1995, 55 properties in Phase II
have been vacated. The total number of properties
now vacated for both Phase I and Phase II is 198.
PHASE III: ACQUISITION AND
RELOCATION
As of October 31, 1995, an accurate figure for
Phase III, priority blocks 11 through 15 is still being
calculated. Once the probable cost for Phase III is
determined, it will be announced if those
homeowners located in Priority 16 can be included
in Phase III.
T'he offer process for those homeowners within
Phase III is progressing rather quickly. The
September issue of the Buyout Update was the first
issue to report the Phase III offer status. This
October issue of the Buyout Update reports the offer
process is now 70% complete.
Offer Update:
As of October 30, 1995, of the 69 homeowners in
Phase III, 48 offer meetings have been held, with 21
hameowners accepting their offers. �
Ctosing Update:
The acquisition and relocation ciosing process for
those homeowners and tenants in Phase III is also
progressing quickly. The September issue of the
Buyout Update reported the closing process for
Phase III begaa with the first scheduled closing on
September 29, 1995. As of October 30, 1995, there
has been a total of 9 acquisirion closings conducted,
with a total of 3 Phase III homeowners who have
now closed on their relocation homes. To date, only
1 property in Phase III has been vacated.
Appraisal Update:
Due to the near complerion of the Phase III
appraisal process, this October issue of the Buyout
Update will be the last to report the Phase III
appraisal status. _ ;_ _. .
As of October 30, 1995, the appraisal process. for
Phase III is now 89% completed. To date, 61 field
appraisal studies have been completed by Lyle
Nagell Company. Lyle Nagell Compaay has
forwarded 58 completed appraisal reports to the
office of WDSCO. WDSCO has forwarded 57
appraisal raports to the review appraisal firm of �
BCL Appraisals, Inc. and have now received 55
appraisal certifications back from BCL. WDSCO
has also received 59 environmental reports
completed by PSI. �
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT UPDATE
New Dumpster Hours
Beginning November 18, 1995, rubbish drop off at
the dumpster site will be return'ed to winter hours of
the first and tlurd Saturday of each month from 9:U0
a.ra. to 3:00 p.m. The winter hours will allow for
completion of dumpster acrivity during daylight
hours, for everyone's safety.
Itt addition to the new winter dumpster hours MAC
and WDSCO would like to announce that if there
is a winter weathar advisory, the dumpster site will
be closed. If the dumpster site is closed, a message
will be piaced on WDSCO offica phone at 724-8898
(on Friday night and Saturday only) to advise
residents that the dumpstar site is closed.
T'he November dumpster availability dates ` are
Saturday, November 4, 1995, and Saturday,
November 18, 1995.
Activities
The WDSCO Property Management team will
conrinue to coordinate with Pham Express to
maintain all vacated properties. -Pham Express will
remove the fallen leaves during these sutumn
months, and remove snow from vacated properties
throughout the winter months on an as needed basis.
With vacant properties located on each block, this
wili give an appearance�of someone still living in
the proparties, as„ a maans to promote increased
.� ::
safety to homeowiie�s still residing in the
neighborhood ='- =� �
, � W . D . SCHOCK COMPANY, INC . - -- . . . _. .
o,� 5844 28TH AVENCIE SOUTH
—'MIPINEAPOLIS, r� s54i�
� (612)72��8898
(800)260-7062
�
_ _—_ _ __ .. . _.i- .. _�_ _.. . - - - . � -
��,�:�� �
.�.---� ,, , ..�,� ___
' .EAA'•'� w�.._.:-_--�•
� �� ar'�� �;�U,S.aO�TAG[�<
� NOV- _'95 � �E'':4 p,� .
� ti. � �, � Y
Cp ���::`•w) .� rIA
�MN �.`�_,..."� T :
Tom Lawell
1101 Victoria Curve
Mendota Hghts, I�i 55118
; ��
v
�uu i ri . M� l�xt� A1t�rUx'1' ACTiON COUNCII, OCTOBER 1995 *
. . .
, . �; ;� J
/ :., r
, , ,
, , w, �
: • ! � i � - i ' � :,,�
, , ,,
.i i �� r� ,
�pea�ers :
JefO` �lamiei �
� �: �Executive Director.
� . . ..
(' j � Met7ropolita.n Airports
._ Commission. (IMAC)
e�
Dc:re INead - � .. � .
Minnea.polis City Council Member
Thursday �obe�r 26,19►95
T�ne 7.30 pm.
Mayflower Church
106� E. Diamond Lake Road
(35 W and Diamond Lake Road)
:It is hoped that these speakers
w�t provide some a�nswers to yaur questions and
concerns. .
Every one welcome !
Bring a Fr.iend !
�
,,,. _
Your calls and complaints abaut
ai.rcraf� noise are countec� !
.TlLSt �l 7�6-941 g.
Try to describe .your complaint in
the follovv�ing tenms:
- Low flying sircrai�. .
- Excessive noise. "
- Structural disturba�ace.
The resulfis-are report�ed t� the leg-
islature to sliov�r l�c�w well th�
� MAC is .abating noise.. -Your call
. �: :. .
is worth �the time. !! Qf �he 731.
� complai�ts � in � April 1995 only
195 were from IViinneapolis, 254
from �
�ga��;---119... fioffi_._ In._ver
Grove Hei�hts and 4h� rest fiom .
..- - — . . . ... . ......__..
other suburbs. : � �
Noise
At the "Picnic In The Park" last July 27th
(sponsored by the Hale, Pearl Park, aad '
Diamond Lake Area (HPDL) ma�nY P�PIe
asked about the Sauad In�suL�tion p�
funded by MAC �and the FAA, This
program i� handled by the MAC Center for
Energy and Envirm�ment. You should call
�2s-62ss wrth your quesaons.
e
Page 2 SI�II�C
The I�enver Experience
The New Denver International
Airport (DIA) looks good and feels .
good fao. But, is it a success?
Many :cities, especially Minneapolis,
are looking at UTA with much interest
because. �of simil�,c problems with
giov�ith if�'tra�iic, which, in the U.S. �
is at the, rate of,696 per yeat and will �
.f. � double m flie next 20 yeazs., � NZany ;
airpott� are feeling t�ie psnch of iasu�'i-
j cient fac�ities to support this growth.
I', The questions of aitport e�ansiton
� �sual�►„ hinges upon :more land, longer .
: .. runwa3's, bigger -parldng lots, :,better .
>:;highway r �ess,:: �nore hotels, bigger
�fireigtit faci '�`, es, etc
° �'~Olcter:aitgoit�; such��as ours m the.� :
��-fTwm CYhes;. are nu�miag out of land . .
� �: ; ;oti whicii; zo :expaad �and �are seriousiy
:.= � considering a new.auport. Is DIA a�
model for the. Twia Cities? .. .
� � �Tere are some comparisons: .
Denver Infernational Air�ort
Ccast: $4.8 B�ion
��- � : � Anmtdl Passengers: .33 taillion
Projected annual aircra,%1` �
.. .: -, operatlons: . 530,QOU . ' -.
:.Seoul South Korea :
. . ..Casr: :4.2.b�llion. (projected}
�.. �4nrtuatPassengers: 27:int�lion °
� Projected annual 'aircruft
� • � � operations:. 285,000 �
�
.K:ansia. Japan
Cost: $14 Billion
Annual Passengers: 31 mt�lion
Projected annual aircraft
� operatiorrs: 16Q,OOQ
FIon�Kon�
Cost: $14 Br�lion ..
Annual Passengers. Z6 million
Projected annual aircraft
, operations: 165,OQ0
Narita,, Japan �
Cart: $5:2 B�tion
Annual Passengers: 21 mt'tlion
Projected annual aircraft
operations: 119,OQ(}
Munich
Cast: $7.1 B�lion �
Annual Passenge "rs: 12 mt'Ilion
Projected anmcal aircraf�
: op'eratians: 185,OQ0 ..
11�Ttmeapolis - St. Pau1 � -
-Cast: a4.4 B�lion (est.)
Annual Passengers: 24.5 million
. : 1994
Annual aircraft o'perations 1994:
� � 455,000
���
The .facs�ifiies at DIA are so much better .
than at the ol'd Stanelton airport �
that they ha�v�e expeiienced; so far, onts'
4 aircraft delays per 1400 operations
whereas at the old Stapelton, airport i�tere �
were 28 delays per 1000 operations under `
sinu'lar weather condiiions. � �leis is .
atlributed mainty to the triple parallel
tunway configuration where three sunulta
neous instrument landing,s or take offs
can occur. Compazed to other national
aiiporrts the percent delays are: �,
�
t� �
�11Ue�' tCU11t.�
Compared to other national
airports the percent delays aze:
Y3Yfi: �0.4 �,/o . .
ORD: 3.1°r6
:� .J��K: 1.7°r6
�' `Stapelton: 2.�°r6
LAX: 2.2%
MSP: 2.3°�6
DFW: 3.6°�0
ATL: 1.6%
Aircra�i delays �aanslates in#o economic
�P���: ���Y for the
busutess community supporbng the air-
port. Delays . are a fimction of the
� ainovat of air iraffic �rarting to take off
or land and ai�e.c�rpected to get stead�y
worse at MSP as fira�ic iutcreases.
� Mr`Joiin Richter��has:'ariade �ava�able : � ,
:� some newspaper, clippings from � ` �
om
..:.Dem�r re�,ard�ng the �new DIA:�, ,. .
Lumber taia� Brtngs 325 Denver
Jabs - Georgia Pacific has opened a
ncw sales center in Denves aztd one of
the ttmee maia reasons was "excellent
aic service" RockyMountain News �
30 June 1995.
New Dee�ver Airport Draw�s First
Caxparate Relocation - Crable
V1I1 T.1ILeS 1t1II0Ui1C� lt Wla �E i11QIVlL1g.
it� headquartens fiom Wisccrosin to
Aurora Colorado to i�ke advantage
of the new DIA RockyMouritain ..: .,
News 12I10/95
�
DIA Doubtes Egpected ProRt In �+'�rst 21Vlonths - The new
Denver Intemational Airport made neazly $13 m�lion in net.
profii� in March and Apr�l cornpared witfi. SS.S million
forecar�t. F�igher revenues and lower casts account for the
healthy condition Racky Mountain News 6/6195
In spite af ti�e negative stat�i�ts fx�o� t�� Stu �d Ti��
abaut DLA, the business peaple in Demver are pretfiy praud.
Z�e cost oveYrur�s, bag�age ha�clling aygtezn, de.LaYed o��
concrete problems are mostty solved no�v and L�iA is getting
more at#ention from the 11�nneapalis busmess cotnmtariiy.
The Star and Tn'bune w�l pmbabiy beg�in r+epoifing DIA'�
success next summer when we have forgotten all the pmblems
such a Iarge Project is going to have and we can focus on the
positive side.
- i
.�1��M�i ;
We reaived a call on the SMAAC hot}ine fi+am one res�dartwZw ,. i
asked us if sicport noise had ever been measimed in his area. It � rnrt he
lived nsar 60di aiid Ellio� just a sb�nes tiuow away. ftartt Noiae Monitac #�6. .
The ar�a at+nund #6 is the wonstin fiue � C�ties. # 6 tr.�utecly atuo�vs � �
evr�tts atwv�e 105 dB. I
. .::: ... . . ...
. _ - . . : ...�: �.. .. . .. . : .. . .
InApn1199S, �e number ctfaircra& and le�nel ofsound.rxorded"at #6 �et+e :
�foliows . .. . _
d.�. ,- . . . .. � .... . � . �. x �f L .. .
. > 65 . . >80 , . . , � . >100:' ...
$1�1 4645 . 1980 756 '
The man who called told us he had lived ti�ere for 25 yeers, and ffiat tl�e nois�
was so bad it loosened att the scn�vvs in his home. He had'to g�o aroiu�d aiud
tiBhtei► them regualadY•
''�� �__�_ :��1:_ �� � ' � �, K�� ��
Dean I,indberg - Presiden#
FrankArb- vce President
�� sm�- v� �a�
: Ellee� Scul�y..- Tt+easurer
Saaaane Sornson
Nel1 Cfark
C.G Mamer
Davld S�ger - on leave
Bonnie W6tttenberg - Ex. Officer
.�
TZ1-4993
8247675
789-2724
824-9?35
822-9479
869-5614
827-6059
609-4906
..,. - _- _�
� _ �,
_ _ _ � __ _ _ . _
� j�� paejonur tarJ
�" ..... l� lnoqn 8ur�tauros op
8 G G 55 NW `siu6�aH ��opuaw �`�ot �ut�taS sc asrou a y��'I �
anan� �iao��in 1.0 � G .
ao�ea�siuivapd �(}i� ,
6 6 Ilan�� wol -
�1',�2i?I'If1S. .. � .
���rng�sn : . � � � .
8ii8-ZZ8-ZI9
� L1i�SS'i�B�1t SI'IOdK�NNTYN
< ��II'�� "OS Sf1HWtl'IOJ 9iiS
� ��s
�. � ' � � - . �Nno� Ko�d o� xanos
.� a �....Y . - ... � � �. .. . . . .. -. . � - . � _...
.. ��� . :.::::::::::: � ::-"�'
�
- ....:::_ ._.:.:.: .
� ...... �:� __�.:.�..
: ��.:.: ;.�.-:�.:.. .... .... - �
�': � :........�..r... ' 't::.. �:'.��'.�.�.�...'�.�.:.:.. '.'^.•'i :"'MS'. i : .
' � . .. ' . . . . . . . .. . �
�! ;� . . ... � .��J .
-. SMA�� ENROLLMENT - RENEWAL FORM ? � .
, send to: . ,.: . .. . . . � Supportittg .$25 -
� SMAAC �
. 5116 COLiJMBU5 SO. � ���g �sp �
- MlNNEA.POLIS, MN. 55411 �
nmme phone . .
address �
.. {
�ty � . . �
� Please check if you az�e��v�lii�g to serve on a SMAAC committeee .
� ;: .
. . ,,. �
- �
.. =--: :: :� �: ?7i� xe�mber on the nudlin lobeY o. newsletter.. ixdicates �hC last o md u menaba�l�'
_........ _8... . ... f.i�'..,........ . __.... Y�' .fP � P �
� lr'llease nenew your tiaembershiP today if3wit. ane not crirnts� - .
. ; . .
CITY OF MENDOT/� HEIGHTS
�
November 14, 1995
TO: Airport Relations Commission Members
r
FROM: . Tom Lawell, City Administ a �
SUBJECT: Discuss Status of Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedure '
Implernentation
DISCUSSION
Since the inception of the Airport Relations Commission, we have been
discussing the anticipated implementation of a"Non-Simultaneous Departure
Procedure" for aircraft departing MSP to the southeast. The intent of this
procedure would be to direct aircraft towards non-noise sensitive areas during
those hours when aircraft traffic is light enough to allow the FAA to use such a
procedure.
; j
Under this procedure, aircraft departing the north parallel runway (11 L)
would be issued a departure heading of runway heading. Aircraft departing the
south parallel runway (11 R) would be issued a heading of 105 degrees. A map
showing these departure procedures is attached. These procedures were formally
approved by the MAC several years ago and have been awaiting FAA review and
implementation ever since.
After receiving repeated complaints from IVlendota Heights and Eagan about
the delay in having the procedures reviewed and implemented, the MAC
commissioned their consulting firm, HNTB, to perform the necessary environmental
analysis of the proposed non-simultaneous crossing procedure. A copy of the
report submitted by HNTB is attached.
The report shows that fihe largest noise level increase expected as a result
of implementing the crossing procedure is .2 maximum DNL at Trinity Lone Oak
Church/School. This increase falls well below the FAA established criteria which,
if exceeded, would require thafi additional environmental review work be performed
on the procedure. Despite this criteria, the FAA has expressed concern that those
parties affected by the procedural change be in agreement on its implementation.
On November 13, 1995 I received a telephone call from Eagan
representative Jon Hohenstein who indicated that his City Council has a concern
over the expanded DNL contour shown for Eagan as a result of implementing the
new crossing procedure. He inquired as to whefiher or not we might consider (
revising the proceciure so that aircraft departing 11 L would not be issued a
"runway heading" instruction, but rather some minimal left turn. At �resent such
aircraft are issued an instruction to turn left to a heading of 105 degrees. In
keeping with the FAA's policy of issuing headings in five degree increments,
Eagan's new proposal would mean that aircraft would be issued either a 110
degree or 115 degree heading off of runway 11 L.
,, .
I have placed a call to John Foggia regarding this new development and ;.
hope to hear from him prior to our meeting on Wednesday night: I will be better
able to explain our options at that time.
The Commission should discuss the status of the non-simultaneous
departure procedure issue, and should decide whether or not te recomrr2end to the
City Council that we consider Eagan's suggestion that we modify the proposed
runway 11 L departure heading.
��
11=13-95 02.4?PM
31181l2395 18:39
.
, )
FROM CITY OF EAGAN
S12Y256318
TO 94528940
`�� • • �
� � ��� . � _. . _ . .
_ . . - -- -,
��,gv�i 2Q,1�
Mr. John FogBia �
%iSD$,gec, N�ISB Abas��i�t �
Metrog�li� Aa°portt C�m�oaitsioa
.�W 28th Avenue Seuth •
Minnea�olis, Minn�sata 55450
.-
RE: Fagsn Me�da�i Co�ridor ,iRev�s' ed rt�- � '
Noise A�uatysis for Rectistin'b'butioa af NatrSimult�eous �Tight 1�cac3�s on Runway 11�.
;
�ar Jo�a �
�
prl yc�tr �egucst, we �ave camplet�d a�a�elicn�t►a�y eesessment of gooent�sl noise iamp�s
associated with a revised no�-simult�ous dop� heading for Runway 11L. The anal�sis,
t� be used by Ivi�iC snd F�iA tio drtetminc whether or aat additi�m�t enviroamontal anatysis
is ne�ded, invotved the t�Iculations of DI�II. ca�ntaur� aEtd gri� goints in d�e eAtcidor areh �o
d�,t�cramine whether a cb�ar�ge ia non-simulsa.geaus•depariuc+�a, from a heading of t050 w r�►�vay
head�iao,g, woatd result in a aigaific�a►c'aoisc impact �
The 1994 1VISP ANOMS trac�c usc data indic�ied� that appTo�i�a�ly 69b of �tunv�ray (i1L
depazturos follo�r a non-simul�aeaus �OS° I�eeading- Abouc 18% �of the trafFie de�artiag on
Runway 11.L ge�ally folIows runway headi�ng (Ii'� foilow a ttae�c of lI5° �nd. �96 faflc�w a
raack wish a b�diag af i20°). Ia an effarc tn d�t�rnnine the effect� of shifting �te 1Q5° (Aoa-
aim�l�eous t��affic� tr�f'ic m t tvnway hr$ding dspact�e, �. simplified noise' au�alysis' �
b�aen co�plet�d. , .
Ua'iizing tb�e 1994 tunway use p�atages d�ermit�d by ANOIVIS, i�NL cvrnours for A�SP
�u�ere ptev�'oasty coaiputed as part of the Auat 1ta�dc EIS. Thesc cu�tow�s zeprosent sho 'besa
e�se. To ust sYte offects of the oi�anged praodures,l�NL cantours snd a gr3d p�int an�{t3►sis
wcr� cumplctcd for iwGnry-onc aaisc senaitivr lacstions is� and amund 8�e .�aa � and
Met�dotalMetufo� Keights �ctrisdicdons (po%ts utitived from prdv%n�s �iS'� and Pa:t! 15�
�tudi+�j. T6en sil traffic was takan frvno� the iafc lt?5° nrstck oa Runwsy 1fL, as a worstlt�se.
aasumption fagPraxim�tely b% of dqsa��tures on Ruaway llLj, �ud was prc�porti�aally diWided
betwee�a the two fracica ihat :sptesertt nim�vay beading. Ncw Test DNL coatctas jarere
c�mpused atot�,g with a grid a�nalysis #or t�he a� poll� analyad pt�cviausly fvr �e Y994
t�ciac'mg oonditio�s. �
Compsrison of the base eas� ao�d t�at noJse can�ours ind�cates litde �e in si�ap� or � the
m4t e�oc� of t6e 33NL 66 a►ato�a� shift a mupie of htitidete�i ft�t iu ar�d Ottt (seC a Cd
fEgiue). A comparison of tha iadividuai grid paisrt values rcveated tbat fhe maximurr► HL
c,ha�ge for t�e noise �easitive areas would b�e 0.2 �t st�dy paiuc 13�.�E�inify I.�nel €�c
:.=, � ,; � i
' •_
._
.11-13-95 02:4?PM FROM CITY OF EAGAN TO 94528940 P003/005
-� . .._..... .... .. . . . ' � ,
. � . . :
_. . . . , . .. . . �
� uea���es� ie:3� 8127�56310 � �ac �v�►T . �� e
. ,; .
' , � . I+dr. 3ob� Fogg�a - . . , : . .. ..:�. .. , ;
� . �,�a�, �s►�s , � , . � �; � . : , !
� �� - - ... . . . . � _� _ _ . ... ._ ... : � . . . . . .__. ;
�
� srcb er� Sch�ai) �d at point I8 C,F°Iisboric &den3ota Wor ). of �he,sc as�dy
paiats s atmost alon�g the n�wsy '(soe �rhsd tabit,.
� . - . . . • �
Ta su , it �td ap �at� .. tbt aoa�iawlt�aeoua Runwr�y 11L t��parbucs �o�a �
boading of I05° �o tuaway bc.adii�g is pos��ble �rith ao signific�ai impacx aa ovr.rntt aoiat
. 1e�vela in �nige se�sitive areas is Sad around th� Fagan Menaota t�a�idoz' �tre�.
Ptc�se feeI itx so $ive m� m e�tIl if yau have any question�.
, Ya'cY T�ttiY 1t'oia's, . � . _. � . i . ' ,
HN'I� Ca�t�tiaa . _ .. • ' .
'�veu �: Pt�.t+erman, A3 . .
Proj«x'�anager � , �
. f ECF/ef ... ' � .
s
�
�
�
� , �
, �
. : �
� - - ;
, �. I
, . � �� �
. �
: .
.; -
,
` li�13-95 02,4?PM FROM Cifi Y OF EAGAN
t2/81/1995 1H:39 S12T256318
� .
, __.
,,,_,_ -_..
_; ,,,-;�.•
.�
TO 94528940
:f� �11�4T
P005/005 .
P'
�
;
4� :.
..�•� � ..� � �" r' • � �'" '._� � � �. -.. � � .i �
'�y .
M�u�.� ... � .�. �
��.����.. � �► f L �► � �
�..�M..'�r
y "" �,'
.
�r � ...
,,,�r.�'�� � � —, - - � ' � — � �
� � �
�� �» � �
�
��
.,i - _ .
���� - _ � �. � _
. . �
-,. .r .^.Y
� ,,,
� .
� = -* , , � .
� .,._ - . _
�..�. ,.. � .. ... _ � _ . , � - - ' _
���,.,�..
•,- - ._ - - ' - ' -- . ' '
cr.�.t�3
_ � �.
-a.:.•.:
��.
-.�n,....�`.e"
,,��•ra . . .. . „ ....
:� i � � � � � � � f �
� � � � � � .. � � �
� �
.0 [,
"����
••`-�.�.t....
�..�".��w
�...y.y. ..�,.
`*-,+ '�"" .
'�¢-! : . ...
. . .. - .. -. � �� -
.
� .� � ..� � _ . � - - -
� �$ .... � �s � � -� "
_ � _ . .
• � .. �� " ..."
' � - � � � .� .� � .�
.�:.-,......
.;.�„�,,,�,,,
I��� ,. .. . ..
-tr� � - - T - � �: �
��. _ . _
�4( ....
.ws} ri�-�..�
M .....:
� M"..,,;
_ �w"`�y
-'`�v..,•...�. .. �...' . .. . .
"�`'^"^- .. �� ` - - - - - . . �� . ' _ _ . .' '.
_ � �
� �;'•-t':,
-v.. -..
.... ,v.t
�"�
�
, _...
�� �
��- - . --- -----
_ _. _ _
� � sx
.t.. �.
4
�.
�r
' S'.L^irY�+
w� . .... . ..
��V��.
� � � r
h`::� � �� -�� ..
� � � � � � � � � � f
�'i�„�^'/,,,,�; ,� � � �. � .� ...
.► � ... ..� �. � � � .�
i�$ � a �
�, .. �. ' � �. � ..
' .� .► ' . � �. .
. �
�` �: "' .. -� � ... • ... . ... . ....
\•• �r � �� �► ��
1
1 �
� 1� � � �. In 1� Y a► � � � ! �. �► i �
�� � �� � ��
� � �
� ♦ � �• �
^ � �.• i � � �I
� �� • r ! �
.�'r. v��
v
�dT..��
•'�T,^
.. ��.... 'r �:r
y`LM_� . � ... � � . . ��- ... �� • • ��� � .
.. •
.5y�''+ . . ...
%'.__„_ _
__
�
�.�..� -
���
�-�
=� `Y _ _
__
__.,.. : . _ ..
�.....,..,._ 1 , ..� .� _
. .
-„ _ �
_.. ...% � �.� � � �� � , : .
:i4�..�'.. ... . . �- . _ � . .�
•'�---ry • � a • : ._ _ .
' � '
'_',ff.`—... :. �.. � , ' - �
... •.-.. � � _ _ � ,�.. -
. Z.Ti.`�...�. .. �' 1' .. L . •� •• :�
.. �
.
�..^.� 4 . � � ♦ � � �
( �" . . � �. w ♦ �
` �. . .
�}
. �T,1nv 4
....:�
�n �� �� �
�:,�-� - ` -
�.�,.,'� _ " -
;�„�� .
�
�
�
c
0
- _ _�_.._� ....,.� ,-� .� • -
___ � _
- .s��.. c� _-- � - � . -
�, ,�_--_._..._���--��h.��_'�._,.4 � '_`sy a . -�3�#■�'
�.
� �
-_- ���_.��- .
__-- ..._-
�" �===a..-u�c:rrrr_�,••�:��sa�s�°•���-�r�r���.�:�t�r,.�+� , �i
CITY OF MENDOiA HEIGHTS
�
November 14, 1995
TO: Airport Relations Commission mbers
r
FROIVI: . Tom Lawell, City Administ o �,
SUBJECT: biscuss Nighttime Operations and Shoulder Hour Considerations `
DISCUSSIOIV
Over the past several months we have from time to time discussed the
subject of nighttime flight operations, particularly as they relate to "shouider
hours" (10-11 p.m. and 6-7 a.m.). This topic has previously been identified as a
priority topic by both the Airport Relations Commission and fihe Northern Dakota
County Airport Relations Coalition. At our request, this topic is currently being
addressed by the MASAC Operations Commission, thus I thought it would be
useful to include this item on Wednesday's agenda as a topic of discussion.
Attached lease find a co
(�;;: p py of a number of documents related to this issue.
-- ' These documents include: -
1. Nighttime Operation and Shoulder Hour Statistics prepared by MAC.
2e Neighborhood �etter of Concern - Portland Avenue Area.
3. Draft Letter of Concern - Mendota Heights and other Northern Dakota
County Coalition Communities.
Previously we have discussed the shoulder hour statistical information
which shows that some minor flight rescheduling could help lessen the number of
flights departing between the hours of 10:30 and 11:00 p.m. Opportunities to
lessen the number of departing flights between 6:00 and 6:30 a.m. are fewer
given business travel needs.
The draft letter to MAC Chairman Sandy Grieve states our concern with
nighttime operations and specifically asks for shoulder hour relief. A similar letter
will likely be sent by other cities in the Northern Dakota County Coalition.
� • • �
The Commission should decide whether or not to recommend to the City
Council that the attached letter be sent to Chair Grieve to express our concerns
�� - � regarding nighttime airport noise.
r
{
,
, , /,, , e
_
r i
� i � � � r � i �
�
.� . .
: , . _
. , _.. .. :
. . . _ --
. .. ..
,.
: ti,. _ � _
Ch � ',S 1 Sk.' _ J. i �`� it" v.� �} d'r.y ,y V�..� �,' . .
� .
y � . �s 1 -�. �.� . �i y t- � ..
' c i l�:. ��'.: �ti �.��. s t y i,� 4` ? y- e `f; ��r Y a���'
, 1. :. ... `�.. �
.. .....� .'� �„ .. . -:: �.
. . . �...:. . . . .. . . ; .. . .+..' � • .. • ' "y... .. . : �
i _. ,?
• , .::. ,;... , . ., ..
c � ,, t l
; , ,, _ . ..
, : . .. _
;.. _ � �
..
,. . . . , ..
....,. ,. ,: . :
,, ., �
, . ._ .:• ; •'. •,i
..r.: '.�.j �„.�.: ��-
. . . �:...: ' >� � . . . :.. �.� . �. . , �.- . .. ". . , : . ':: � `:..' � -... . . . .
' .: �.a ;.._: �. ��: . . � .
, y::
.
.. . � � ..� �. . �: . - ... . . . .
• � . - ., �- - . � � � � . . �� - . . . . . . � � . � .. � ', . ��' . f .
. _ , . . .., , . , . ,' , . . . ' . �;� . .
. . . . � . . . , _ . . . � � . .. . . � �. �''�'' � . .
. • . . . . . . � • - . ' � � : . . � � � � , � . . . _ ' . ' . . . . � .
� .'�.`- ., �., '^. �. ., �:� :. ., . .., ., . .. _ . . � _ .
. • : ' . . . �. `�.. . . . . . . . . .. . . � , . .�i'i � : .. . .
ii . ' . .
. - . �:, . . • -
-h..'.. . � , •:5�"�!�':.
• . �. . �•' : : : .
. . _ _ � ".
, ._. ' . �. �: ,� .. (
.. . : : � ,
: : • . ;` . . .
;.� . :..; . ;' .' . ' , � 4 ���
:. ... . . 1��� _ ���� � �" {���,. � r9, t ;:�. �t �, .
.. . � .. :...,,.. . •. ' � - � �•' � �
, . • .... .�,.,...� ,: ...� �., ,
s �. .
�:^ � 1� . k���. t � y ..�^ 1 . �E� � ryJ � � .r o u...;. ip �,4 �� � t.t�"h� .�'ix4�,tlj, �lx�
.. .. , . . � � . , . . �:i• ?,... _ �;4s �.�.J r .:�c^•.r�.?' ..?p. ti. r. e.J:: ;�'`J �r� �i az.�� v� �6 ,s-�.� }i R .
, . . .. . . . — - -.or +,�.. �¢:.''�! n$'"�:`�.-..xl�,-`.7:.. ., ��..'�"w,:i_ .
p t� � � '�: . , -', � � / ��: � :, a, � ��� s: ' :
The abov� ubk rep�e�� �tia� b�t�o�a 9:45 P.1►� aad 7:15 A:A�S. ov�r a"typical" night in
Septembac 199�4. 'Y7� "�O�" column repreaeats oct�el fli�he� �urring over a single
Septcmber nigh! 9:45 P.b� 7:15 A.1� The "HIiH � Schedule" column represents
OAG Sc �vit�r Plus gtu H, Hurnpluey Tamit�l pr sctiviry for 1994 and
1995. T6e �Ctivity �r ay with OAG dats, at�d no "dupliccattion" of �ights is
represtaxd. 'Tbe data ' Qll tio�s • prop aa,d jet,
�
::. � �
�
. :
�
C
� '
I 1 r°
' --�__' ' ','''. '
. .. - _ _ _ ......
� ... �... . ��.
I�
_ _ ....,. ,.
�����. � _ ',.: . .�.. .: � ��.
� �
�'
': .::. • ".:;•: .
_'
I _ . II '
i
.
- .
.
• ,
�,, F IIy
�
�.� ��. ���. ��. ��:
. +r �
�
� w 17rr
: :'// /�� �.
..... . ..... _ .....
�� i I f •r
_ .,
��
_ .:
, . ' � . . � . . ,��
M1
i
. � �,
h
,: .i . _ � . . � �'� � /
, \.
� � �
. � � il �
� � �
M ^ � o
� �
Ff � � v � S
3
' , w
� _ � �' � �
� � ��
. fia ' s
� � � x � .
� y �� � �
. � �,
� _ � � � �
� ._
� � �
� �� �
w. �
� � y
� . _ �. . .
. . : � x :� o
� :, . .
w . _ ,
. . -� � .� �
. . . . �: .. - . .. . � � � � . i ' � .m . . . . . � . . ..
. � �W � � � =�� �. � .
. � . : : g - �. . � :
�� � � � .
c.a � , �
w � ��
r� 3
. 1� � b � �
� • ; � e � � .
�
�f . � O .
• �� . � a � �
;� � �. � � � �„
� Z ;;� �� � . � . . .
� '� � � ' � a
�. ,� . . :� �... .
: � �,
'� : � � .
. � ` "" . � '
. �: � �
;� . . . � �, . . .
� -. , -:
. . ._ �
�' . .N N .� � . � . � . �
� .� . f; .
� : . . . � � _ � ., . ,
. _ .. .. . . . .:;� .
i
� i .,: ,. .... .
f ,.
M M M
,i�` . :~ii N� N�� MP�� .�a•� 4~9e�- MN
,
N � � � .
N MCO e1'� ti� �N �1� M�
`
� .
`` N,.�C tt') N tL� N• Q� G� t�'f W �- �p �p .-
p� Z C v- O A Q �- CO !M r p C G
�
:� .
'" � tf! N .:•'- h � M O� o
>� �D� �D N �N . Q��„ �P• (`�r' ' -
�I �. .
O � .
!►o� ' : � • • � � � � . � ' � '.
r�i , ' Q > > 'C 'C 'C > . > To � Tv �
� . - � EE a �- �,Q � > � > � �
C� E � �Ea,� �.�, � .
�s/ � ��,: 00. .�OC�� �� '` a .. . .
�! � �� �� :;.��{��,.:.,N� �� 'N�.. , . .
� � . .. � N � T N .. . _ , Y
.;� -, _ m ��,�.Y � t.�5 �y r;. A.�� !'.` r . . � •,'F .4 'I. F +:�: '
li '� t ,
•,. .,, F+" ) R � t `,•5 M��r :� l y , -�. J ( r rY '` ,.t �.y :, �'3.�'�. ��F � .
�.`' x ,�b . . ' �.. . g„? ` .N �f �� i- �� ���, �r.,r. � 3 � h r�S� 1 �`1 t 7 i� J`�ti � Y�1'1 -1 �
�. . 4 � � . x�•,,,, � , r� . !- <r�"�� `�� �triw�"".F. l �KE�,.+? �� f ,�..a �� �'� � ,�, }�� .
E! 1. '_..r:.- ..�..r.'• i .... ,:_�:F.�.. i..�u .�. .�n. .. ..:... ..1 7`i�...itei'V:.+riWi±i�✓i+ _1..;M1.L:'I-' �.,� . �:k. .....:.Y.A-:K'1' . .... . �. ....��i . ...... .. .. . .i... ..... ... � . . �.4-..^.Y}4. .. ..
� r
� �y ` o :� . .::� ��� 4 �r � T.
� !� t` t0 v� O .� -.� �,..�
i/i M �t � N�-,� -N tfl
.. 1� . ,..
... ,�:•.� . � .,. , � � . � .vr',. 1�?�:
'•� r - �Q `r�r r ai� � {ii � �s*�' Q �w
"� pN,, � z ...�r �n r� .— ch ap
' p... ;:u O . .� .. .+ f
= t�,
x
. -. 't fl t r �,. 5. �. � =: �,.r4 % . �, � z:�� s�'�n..t�.�� .
: � :: , �, :.,
� .�. ." ti � � � �''��p � M cq b-Q�p �
� -:�� 1 Q� tb �. N P� �'�,. Cf tt� �*'�:'s
- ; � ei' :a - V' !� � `.: ch Qi
• °„�:i�`. .
����'`�vr . � � ,,` ` ?
. . '' � .••� � ' � � � � � M'L
E .aa ,-a
� ¢ Q � � � �
J� G� <C�O �,
� � j o_ r �.e- :� ��., f
Ti .- ii v �,,J �""¢.z
_ � � r ; `' - C�. p� A : �- �
r N � � � � :
� r '��1 "3.i�. .,
.. . .. . _ » . . .. . . ... .. . .. . . . _ .... . . . ,.�� rY�S. eo �
�4'"�'ri.,}� sc'.r-rt�h ,tir i •• r �;�},y �.3�z' � ts.'�,� zs�:y��T�•3s7r.,� j
at �..'Yt'i�".r �"1-�'L�.r3a � ? . '' n.sia��'�, ! ^",�; r .. �
i�► � N � � .
� 1� NM � M �,
..: -. :
, � t � • .
�
;, �
+s..,.r`y., !.;,��'. �. 'i :'` .. . ,,-.._ �..��. ....'F.�, , � � y
���, t � .O �•� . Y . . � t ` . .. .,
�`m Of t'r! u7i � O `
,
��' �,;�x� - a
. ' .\ 4 .,:�:4C i ;J� h.l ,
'Tcv� . . � � � ... ' 1'�. . . . .
�. . ,
� r�l
+� M
` . �=, . �� cf..��.
"`�� , . x . .. .
� a,.,,�.r
,��r , � _e h �, ti „ ,,�.
�o �• ; , , ,
N "N/q G ,�p
�Q t�'� �� V� .� V/ 'T}, ' 4 �� C�. V k Ts'f. � L L✓ ..
��V t'�'t � ,r•.1A n.r r' `�' ,
� M.
4�^Sr y �.�-7 �/
JJJa,,,���^ � .r.1 . . . .. . .. � .
. S � � '�• t1 �3� � �' fj J t '� ..5
i .� i : � ,� �...r
�� +';' � � = t�l y } 1 ..' � _ �.. y . .
r�= >� #;� +� �
Q 'li � .'. � 1 t � � ..�'� l f . '��� �y {�+'1 , :1 � � '..
� ;':{i t � � 1ii "1'i` � � 4`w� * � � � r - i rt,
�J..� n .,:.. �. n . � . . . . . _ �r` r :r.:`�, �,: +,_
d'';= . ., , . . .�
-.,:t.• —r . �r,rr.-. tr -�-:3,t,v� v>s•-+S raal.�i,rh i�:Cs 'y� .' � �i �$�
.r_� ,-. , . . -..� . ._., ._., ,:., w
. � � . . ..... . ... ... .�� .. . . . . ..�.. .. _ � . ,' .. ._ . �_ _. .
� "Sl�oulcler" �Iours .�nal�sis
119�[hays Sampied during Jan 95, Apr 95, Jul 95, Oct 94
' Avg # OPS y �
Hour # OPS per Nite Hou� # OFS
22-23
23-00
00-01
01-02
02P03
03-04
04-OS
05-06
06-07
2191
998
260
57
46
71
374
566
2938
18.4
8.4
2.2
0.5
0.4
0.6
3.1
4.8
24.7
22:00 22:00-22:15
2191 22:15-22:30
22:30.22:45
22:45-23:00
23:00 23:00-23:15
998 23:15-23:30
23:30 23:45
• 23:45-00:00.
Avg # OPS Avg # OP�
per Nite per Nite
684 �' S.7
643 5.4
451 3.8
413 3.5 18.4
342
22�3
238
185
2.9
� Z.0
.Z.O ,A.
'1.6 ••
8.4
� 10P.M.=7A.M.. 7501 63.0 00:00 Q0:00-00:15 92 � 0.8
� 11 P. M.-6A. M. 2372 19.9 260 00:15-00:30 86 0.7 �.
� • . - - • . " • - � 00:30-00:45 : 50 0.4 �
00:45-01:00 32 ..0.3 2.2
01:00 01:00-01:15 � 22 0.2 � .
Hour ST 2 ST3 ST3 q6 57 01:95-01:30 � 15 � . 0.1 �
.. � � . . � . . 01:3d-01:45.. 7 0.1
� 22-23 .1212 979 44.7°� � 01:45-02:00 13 0.1 ::�`0.5 �
.23-00 692 306 .30.136 . + �
00-01 � 177 83 31.9% OZ:00 02:00-02:15 15 0.1 �
` .: 01-02 � � ' 37 `. - . , . 20 : : - 35.136 ' .. _ : . .. 46 02:15-02:30 �; , � 2 . Q.1 �
; : : ;02-03 : • . :. 24 � 22 . . ; . .. 47.89�6 : . ... , U2:30-0245 . : : : 4 0.0 y ; . : �
� 03-04 � �- 34 3T 52.1% 42:48-03 00 't5 �. 01 ��0 4
��' ; F " 04-05 � 261 : .� 113 � , 30 2°.6 .: �: t . x�. � �
�.� �r /,� � � ti f ��05-06 *` 3, �y `.174 � �,�� �-° `�< 392 ' � :�, 69:39�6 �. ' ,; � �03.00 03:00-03:15 � 10 -�0 � -� r�,r � �
�::>_':u:.�.,..s;.�'i.:.....::'ls.'''..rii+'A7,.��'-.i.s:��;...%'.An7cb�r�� . ._ c_:.n�� �;k;._r,�'wp�ini �., ;..��.,ar„�.i�.:�_��a'.-wn.���ww.r�w r,._ ,.. w r .. _., . �. w � --. . �� �..1�.'�.:.�.... .._,:..."r'�G.�•!
,
�t . { 7�.. � e �:.. i` �: .' K . J 'F4. 1 , „k {i4 a y�*}�.+; t li7 � M
` ' 04:00 04:00-04'15 , � , 05 = 0 7 " �
, � .�
� : � � - •� ' 0 �
� 3T4 .04:15-Q4:3 ``� 120 L. 1 0.: ��y �..
. . >., �:.,
. . 04:300.04:45 � � 96 ` . 0.8
• H. ., �._.:. , .. :. : . .: .
. , .. -:: 04:45-05:00 73 � . : �0.6 �:- 3.1 � .
: :., : � . .. , .
. . . .
OS:DO 05:OQ-05:15 .,: , . 7i _. 0.6 '�
. . . . 566 05:15-05:30 � 91 0.8 � � �
; .: . .;-.. :. � ~.: � : . -�. . . .
, , , ..�> : .: .�. 05•30-OS•45 t .153 1,3 �;; .
• . _ �.�; .
� 05:45=06:00 251 2.1 '4.8 �
, . _ . . .
, .. ; .r ....
.. . _ -_ . .,.. , ' - . . � : � > , � - . . . _ . . . .
.
_ .:, . .
. . : ...
� 06:00 �6:OA-06:15 697 8.9 . .
. � ... . ;
2938 06:15=06:30 524 � 4 4
t ^� ,� :
, = �, , 06:3G-06:45 `' '1003 '.'. 8 4 _..,
j ` y � . , 4.� ;r� t': a�' Q6:45-07:00 �: : �14 =; 6 0 24.7 �'r ,
, � �;.�. ..:.�.. .�:: .::;. ..�: . __.... >. . . ry.: = _.,(,�
,.,�
. � . � . . � . . . .�. .^R+,�a+«F"' - " t . .. . '.C. . .. . ,. � , � �j....;�.
. �
" ' �`� � � � .'.���- ' . � ...' " . _ . ' . '
��.. . ..A�� .. �_
� . � . . . ,wy �. ..�, .
i � ��- ': k �.e ✓. �f��:,��
' . . . . . �. . i Y.'. � rr 4., � I �T . . . �, � � ��..
�:: ' ; � .. 4 . . { " : � . .
� � ��� �� '.. .... :'... �.:. 'y..
� . ai yy t L
, ` , � . ,- � , ' .. ..
S � � . �' t . � . � ��,.
S
f � ��,� '� , {' } �� � � � ��' � yt M �.. ti �� �' rx- ..
r � :�, i ...' i �'. :' � ;i v� .J d{ t (� � 0. 1� f�J��^;� "
'i� .. -.:' '�. . . f ri
� .. :. .... .-.�.
' ' . �..`7r �-�+ r P
.��f ... '. ... i : . : re ^� ��
�... . � . 5 ._ r., f i
I
� ��.-� . :.,� �_�: _ . E i _. .�. ,. _ ..�.i� . ...... . . . . .. , ... �.w.4:_ . ... ... .. . . . �„ _... .. . .. ,
. .._._. . ... _ . ., „ .. . .. .., ..... . .. ..... . . __.. j �� r '�-. t 4r t t
�.. ...-,.�._.... ., .._. .... ... . � : . ..._ .. �.....,.-. . . -., ,;:. ' _ - __
. �. .. � ., � .. � . �. .. :,. . .: . ::::�. _< ... .. .. . .
�
1000 Portland Avenue
Saint Paul, MN 55104
September 22, 1995
Mr. Robert Johnson, Chairman
Me�tropolitan Airports Sound Abatement Council
6040 28th Avenue South �
Minneapolis, MN 55450
Dear Mr. Johnson :
�
'�
" I am writing on behalf of the Portland Avenue Neighborhood Organization (PANO),
a group of citizens who are concerned about air traffic noise over our rooftops during the
middle of the night.
This summer planes began to descend over our homes in the middle of the night--
most often between 3:30 and 5:00 a.m. Many planes. Some nights there was constant
disruption due to the noise. Our area residents had never been given notice of or reaso� for
this schedule. We are extremely irritated. We are losing sleep.
The most .recent example was Friday night September 15 starting about 3:15 a.m.
Several years ago, our corridor was identified as a landing path for planes to Mpls/St.
` Paul International Airport. Planes flew overhead during waking hours--from 7 a.m. til 11 �
p.m. Although air traffic noise is a great inconvenience, our neighborhood cooperated witli
the plan. These new hours strike us as being unreasonable �and unduly disruptive.
We ask that you look irtto this situation with the resolve to reflow air.traffic
between ll p.m. and 7 a.m. away from our homes.
Our association has its next meeting November 12. We hope to hear from you .
' within 10 days so that we may report back to our neighbors: Thank you.
Sincerely, "`�,
1
�� ,
� � ��... (J�'�'U
cc: Mayor Norm Coleman
cc: Dave Thune
cc: Blakey
P 0 Coo��tor
T .: 222-3691
r
Mr. Sandy Grieve, Chair
Metropolitan Airports Commission
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55450
Dear Chair Grieve:
,
� � ' , � � 1
November 22, 1995
r�' �
i am writing to you to express our concern over aircraft noise in generai,
and nighttime aircraft noise in particular. Many of our residents have expressed to
me their concern regarding this subject, and the many, negative family impacts
caused by such noise.
Over the years, the MAC has made use of voluntary nighttime agreements
to limit the amount of scheduled traffic operating between 11:00 p.m. and 6:00 �
.
a.m. Recent discussions by the MASAC Operations Committee suggest that the �.. �.�
�� ' ' MAC has an oppor�unity to expand. this time �frame at the "shoulder hours". to `. ^.' "(
: benefit those ;in our. communities most affect by aircraft �noise. .-�= ' '�
-:. �
On' behalf of Mendota �Heights; I respectively `request the MAC to `take steps `:
to negotiate new nighttime agreements with the air carriers :to limit scheduled ,�
operations between the hours of 10:30 p.m: and 6:00 a.m. ' � ��
1 look forward to working with you as we cooperatively seek to improve the
noise environment around MSP. Should you have questions regarding this
request, please let me know.
w
Sincerely,
CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS
�:�,
;�� r rn .
_
Charles E. Mertensotto
_ Mayor
. ,.
� , . � ` � `
. .
� � . � il0i �ictoria Curve • 1Vieridota I�eights,' 1ViN � 5v118 � ` �' 452 • 1850 °" � � �' �'
_ . �. , _
u
m
CITY OF IVIENDOTA HEIGHTS
IIIIEIVIO '
November 14, 1995
_
TO: . Airport Relations Commission Members
.-
FROM: Tom Lawell, City Administ ��
SUBJECT: Discuss MAC Dual Track Presentation Scheduled for December 19,
1995
DISCUSSION
As you know, the final MAC/Met Council recommendation on the Duai
Track Airport Planning Study is due in January, 1996. The draft Dual Track
decision document has not yet been issued, but in today's Star Tribune there
appeared a story regarding this topic.
i' Due to the importance of this issue to Mendota Heights, 1 have scheduled
with the MAC a full presentation on this subject for the December 19 , 1995 City
Council meeting. Members of the Airport Relations Commission are weicome and
are encouraged to attend this meeting as well. The presentation will be given by
Mr. Nigel Finney of the MAC staff.
ACTION REQUIRED
Check your calendars to see if Tuesday, December 19, 1995 is open for you
to attend the MAC Dual Track presentation before the Mendofia Heights City
Council.