The URL can be used to link to this page

02-14-1996 ARC PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA AIRPORT RELATIONS COMMISSION AGENDA February 14, 1996 l. Call to Order - 8:00 o'clock p.m. , 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of January 9, 1996 Meeting Minutes. , 5. Acknowle e Iteceipt of �arious Reports/Correspondence: a. MASAC October 24, 1995 Minutes ' b. MASAC December 5, 1995 Minutes ` c. MASAC Opera.tions Committee Minutes 7anuary 17, 1996 � j d. MASAC Operations Committee Memo on Shoulder Hours Considerations ' e. MAC Part 150 Residential Sound Insulation Program Information f. 1994 to 1995 Comparison by A.ir Carrier - Noise Management Methodology g. MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for November � h. Corridor Gage Penetration Analysis for November i. MASAC Technical Advisor's Report for December ' i j. Corridor Gate Penetration Analysis for Decembe'r k. MSP Monthly Compla.i.nt Summary 1. SMAAC Newsletter m. Part 150 Buyout Upda.te n. An.nouncement of Joint MAC/Metropolitan Council Meeting 6. Unf'inished and New Business: a. Discuss Mendota Heights Airport Plan of Action b. Discuss Dua1 Track Airport Planning Process Environmental Impact Study Response c. Discuss Noise Abatement Depariure Profiles (See Jan. 17 MASAC Ops. .;' � Minutes) ' � 7. Updates a. Review of Mendota Heights Noise Abatement Ordinance for Construction within the Metropolitan Council Noise Zones b. Inver Grove Iieights Request on Corridor Procedures 8. Other Comments or Concerns. 9. Adjourn: Au�liary aids for disabled persons are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. 1'lease contact City t�.dministration at 452-1850 with requests. � C � C' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS � February 14, 1996 TO: Airport Relations Commission FROM: Kim Blaeser, Senior Secretary SUBJECT: Election of Officers - Chair and Vice Chair DISCUSSION At the February meeting each year, the Commis�ion elects from its membership a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson. The terms of such officer shall be for a period of one year. (Please see attached Ordinance No. 290). Currently, Scott Beaty is the Chair and Joe �euman is the Vice Chair. ACTION REQUIRED Elect a Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for the 1996 Airport Relations Commission year. NOTE: Commission members Greg Fitzer and Ellsworth Stein were reappointed by City Council to serve another three year term, at the February 6, 1996 City Council meeting. C �� CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAROTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCS N0. -��}..290 AN OR.DINANCFs ESTABLISBING THE AIRPORT RELATTONS COMMTSSIONS The City Council of the City of Mendota Fieights does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1 ESTABLISHMENT OF COMMISSION The Airport Relations Commission for the City of Mendota Heights is hereby established. SECTION 2 COMPOSITION The Airport Relations Commission shall consist of seven residents of the City, appoirited by the Ma.yor with the consent of the ma.j ority of the members of the City Counci.d. . The membe�s shall serve terms of three years, except for those initially appointed to the Commission. =n order to ensure that terms will be staggered two original appointees shall serve terms of one year, two shall serve terms of two years and three shall serve terms of three years. At the organizational meeting of the Airport Relations Commission held in February of each year, the Airport Relations Commission�shall elect a Chairperson and a Vice Chairperson from among its members. The terms of such officers shall be for a period of one year. - - SECTION 3 DUTIES A'ND POWERS The Airport Relations Commission shall advise the City Council on ma.tters pertaining to airport noise and operations at Minneapolis- Sta Paul Int�ernational Airport. The Airport Relations Commission is expected to monitor proposed rules, procedures and programs which impact the air noise situation within the City, and to make recommendations to the City Council regarding strategies to mitigate the City's air noise exposure. The Airpor� Relations Commission shall have such other duties and powers as granted by the City Council from time to time. m SECTION 4 MEETINGS The Airport Relations Commission shall hold at least one meeting each month at a time regularly established and approved by the City Council and shall hold such special meetings as ma.y be necessary for the conduct of its business. The Commission shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of its proceedings, which record shall be maintained as a public record. The Commission shall transmit to the City Council a true and correct copy of all of its minutes, recommendations and other reports. SECTION 5 COMPENSATION The members of the Airport Relations Commission sha11 serve without compensation but shall have the right to be reimbursed for expenses incurred in the performance of their duties. SECTZON 6 VACANCIES Any of the following may cause the office of a member to become vacated: 6.1 Death; C� 6.3 6e4 . Disability or failure to serve, as shown by failure to attend four regularly scheduled meetings in any one calendar year; Relocation of residence from the City; Resignation in writing. Vacancies shall be filled as soon as possible for the unexpired portion of the term by the Mayor with the consent of the ma.jority of the members of the City Council. SECTION 7 This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect . from after its publication according to law. Enacteci and ordained into an ordinance this twentieth day of April, 1993. By ATTEST: ;<;; .•��, lC"�..��-.. ��' ) K thleen M. Swanson :, City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ,�.� �. li�l.,�".,e� Charles E. Mertensotto Ma.yor 1 C CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINIVESO'i'A . -,•�• � � � � 1 � � a . . �. .. . • The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Airport Relations Commission was held on Wednesday, January 9, 1996 in the City Hall Large Conference Room, 1101 Victoria Curve. The meeting was, called to order at 8:06 o'clock P.M. The foilowing members were present: Beaty, Leuman, Olsen, Stein and Gross. Commissioners Fitzer and Surrisi were excused. Also present were Interim City Administrator Batchelder and Senior Secretary Kim Blaeser I' '''r • � •' Commissioner Leuman moved approval of the December 13, 1995 minutes. Commissioner Stein seconded the motion. AYES: 5 ' IVAYS: 0 •�' � i • • . � c � � . � . .. � �, � � Interim City Administrator Batchelder briefed the Commission on recent Council action regarding Non-Simultaneous Depa'rture Procedure implementation. Batchelder stated the Council has requested that the MAC implement Proposal #1 which whenever possible, under non=simultaneous departure conditions: - Aircraft cieparting Runway 11 R will be assigned a heading to maintain an approximate ground track of 105 degrees. - Aircraft departing Runway 11 L will be assigned a heading to maintain a ground track along the extended runway centerline, approximately 118 degrees. The Commission discussed the shift in magnetic heading and it was noted that there has been an 8 degree magnetic shift which forces more air traffic over Mendota Neights. The Commission directed staff to clarify the change in magnetic heading with Mr. Foggia. 1 C ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF VARIOUS REPORTS/CORRESPOIVDENCE Interim Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission that he had attended the December 19, 1995 Policy Advisory Committee meeting. Batchelder explained that the FAA has approved that all homes within "boundary blocks" defined by the currently approved 1996 Noise Exposure Map are approved for Part 150 Sound Insulation Program modifications using either Airport Improvement.Program or Passenger Facility Charges Funds. He stated that this boundary block eligibility decision will be valid until new Noise Exposure Maps are developed and approved by the FAA. The Commission noted that 35 additional Mendota Heights homes have been added to the eligibility list. The Commission acknowledged receipt of a letter from Jeffrey Hamiel, MAC Executive Director, regarding Assessment of Environmental Effects of MAC's 7-year Capital Improvement Plan for MSP International Airport and Anoka County-Blaine Airport. � The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Economic Impact Study � Status Report to MAC Dual Track Task Force. Interim City Administrator Batchelder informed the Commission fihat he attended the January 4, 1996 meeting. He informed the Commission that he was disappointed with the presentation of the study and that it is very difficult to read. The Commission acknowledged receipt of the Eagan Airport Relations Commission Agendas for December and January. DISCUSS DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PLi4NIVING PROCESS MEIVDOTA HEIGHTS POSITION ON THE DUAL TRACK ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY RESPONSE Chair Beaty stated that the City Council has not taken a position on the dual track issue and that the Commission needs to make a recommendation to the Council on this issue. Interim City Administrator Batchelder stated that Mendota Heights has not taken a position on the Dual Track Study because the City Council intends to wait until the study is complete so that a fully informed decision can be made. Interim City A�dministrator Batchelder stated that the Mayor is not concerned 2 �.. with having an extremely formal comment in the EIS. He stated the Mayor � is concerned that the Air Noise Miti ation anal sis onl g y y includes insulation costs and that the LDN 65 contour, on which sound insulation areas are determined, is not an accurate footprint of noise impact. He stated the Council feels the LDN 65 contour's inadequacy has been demonstrated by ANOMS reports which record extremely high levels of noise disruption outside the L.DN 65 contour. The Commission concurred with the Council's position on expanding the �DN contour as it will include more homes to be sound insulated in Mendota Heights. Batchelder stated the Dual Track.process has been accelerated by the Governor and Northwest Airlines. He informed the Commission of his attendance at a January 2, � 996 MAC P&E Commission meeting where Northwest Airlines presented the Commission with proposed concept 6A which includes expanded the existing terminal and a north/south runway. The Comrnission discussed the Mayor's position on the Dual Track issuee 1. There should be no further expansion of the existing MSP International Airporto 2. If there is to be any expansion of MSP, any new runway should be parallel to Runway 4-22, due to runway efficiencies realized with parallel runways. 3. The MAC should lanci bank up to 15,000 acres for� new airport and it C��?� �e�d be on the north side of the metropolitan area. If Dakota . County does not want the new airport, they should not be forced to have it. 4. If there is to be an extended MSP International Airport, tlie Part 150 Program will have to be extensively expanded outside the existing LDN 65 and in the amount of money allocated for this program. The Commission discussed how MSP communities have not been given ample time to analyze and officially comment on the Dual Track issue. Commissioner Gross stated that Mendota Heights has an excellent tax base with its industrial distrlct and thai Mendota Heights will experience vacant space should the airport be relocated. The Commission discussed how Mendota Heights would go through a transition period and that there will be an extensive highway system availablee The Commission discussed how a lot of issues have not been reviewed and that there is riot enough tirne to efficiently respond to the EIS. The Commission felt the Mayor should send a letter indicating that if the airport ( � 3 � stays, then the City of Mendota Heights wants assurances such a implementing a curfew, no further expansion of MSP, and an additional runway expansion should be parallel to Runway 4-22. Chair Beaty stated that if the airport is to stay, the following should occur - shrink corridor as new technology permits, departing jets stay south of the City's water tower, use crossing pattern during non-simultaneous operations, all air carriers meet the year 2000 deadline for Stage III aircraft operations, discontinue head-to-head operations at nighttime, and mandate nighttime curfews. The Commission discussed the current use of Runway 4-22 and the preferential runway use syst�m. The Commission discussed that the City needs to make sure another north parallel runway is not constructed. Chair Beaty stated the Commission should discuss this issue further in March. The Commission discussed ground noise issues. Interim City Administrator Batchelder stated he would research the test times and report back to the Commission. �� r' �� . , ,,�, � . , � , � The Commission reviewed its Operations. 2. Composition of IVIAC Body - Accountability Issues. 3. FAA "Close-In" vs. "Distanfi" Departure Procedures. 4. Corridor Definition/Compliance Issues. 5. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures. 6. Equity of Current Runway Use System. The Commission was of the consensus to table discussion on this item until their February 14 meeting in order to allow Commission members to further review and updafie the Action Plan. 4 � a � � ' C � � " � . . . . • • : ' . � � � � • • � 1 � � • • � � Interim City Administrator Batchelder stated he would be present at this meeting. . There being no further business, the Airport Relations Commission moved to adjourn its meeting at 10:25 o'clock P.M. Respectfully submitted, Kimberlee K. Blaeser Senior Secretary � ' __ 5 C�� C _C ti , � �� METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL General Meetina DECEMBER 5� 1995 7:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota I ) . 1. Cail to Order, Roli Call �. 2. Approval of Minutes of Meeting October 24, 1995 3. introduc�ion of Invited Guests Receipt of Communications 4. Technicai Advisor's Runway System Utilization Report and Complairrt Summary 5. Approvai of 1996 MASAC Meeting Dates 6. Report of the Operations Committee Meeting November 17, 1995 1 7. Persons �shing to Address the Counal � 8. Other Items Not on the Agenda 9. Adjoummerrt Ne� Meeting: January 23, 1996 0 MINUTES METROPO�ITAfV AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING OCTOBER 24, 1995 � 7:30 p.m. .� , 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota - 1. Call to Order Roii Caii The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and the secretary was asked to call the roll. The foliowing members were in attendance: Mark Saimen . Northwest Jennifer Sayre No�thwest Brian Bates Airbome � Cha�les Cur►y . A�PA Bob Johnson MBAA � John Smith � Minneapolis CC � Dick Keinz MAC � John Richter Minneapolis � Scott Bunin � St.' Paul . Caroi McGuire St. Paul � Don Priebe - Ri�hfieid ! � Jamie Verbrugge Richfield . � Petrona Lee � Bloomington , John Nelson Bloomington . Mike Schlax Eagan Jill Smith Mendota Heights Mayor Mertensoto Mendota Heights Ed Porter Bumsville Jim Hollenbeck Bumsville Dale Hammons Inver Grove Heights � Manny Camilan St. Louis Pacic , Bob Andrews St. Louis Park Gienda Spiotta Associate Member-Sunfish Lake � • Advisors Denis Cornell Commissioner Joe Gasper John Foggia Roy Fuhrmann Traci Erickson Guests Jan DeiCaizo � 3. Approvai of Minutes FAA MAC Technicai Advisor MAC Supv.Aviation Noise Prog�ams MAC ANOMS Specialist Minneapolis The minutes of the September 26. 1995, meeting were approved as presented. Introduction of invited Guests Receipt of Communication No invited guests. Corr�espondence was received from Larry �ee, City of Bioomington, announcing that a public meeting on the Dual Track Drafif Environmental lmpact Statement will be held December 20, 1995� 7:00 p.m:, Bloomington City Council Chambers. If you have any questions, piease call l.arry Lee [948-8947]. A letter received October 17, from Mike Schiax, altemate representative Eagan, listed � examples of "unnecessary noise events". Mr. Schlax requested tail numbers of military F-16's _ through ANOMS data, and that MASAC support policy against private aircraft use at MSP. John Foggia responded that ali military operations are filtered from ANOMS. Chairman Johnson referred the correspondence to the Operations Committee for response. A formai statement wiil be sent to Mr. Schlaz. 4. r� � ; Technical Advisor"s Runwav Svstem Utilization Reqort and Compiaint Summarv The Technicai Advisor's report was distributed. John Foggia reported that the ANOMS technicai system is working well, and reviewed the following points of interest: "` Page 3 contains the new title "Availabie Time for Runway Use" which was requested , at the last meeting. * Air tra�c has shifted into fali weather pattems [SE flow changed to NW flow] 34% departures over Minneapolis in August increased to 43% in September. * There was incceased utilization of the RUS. * ANOMS reported 47.7% Stage 3 use at MSP for September 1995. � * RMT 12 is still out of service. . . :'` The Nighttime flight tracks requested at the September meeting are included in the report package. � � • 5. MAC Update Jeffrey Hamiel, MAC Executive Director, addressed the councii on the foliowing issues: � The completed Runway 4/22 extension includes an 11,000' runway surface. Fill is now being moved in and the foundation wo�ic is in process. Negotiations are on-going for the project dealing with mitigation. The 4/22 extension wiil be fuily operational by summer's end 1996. The Dual Track process is on schedule. The Commission has been meeting early every month for briefings and speciai reports on Duai Track. MAC's recommendation, which wiil strongly encourage legislature to make a final decision, wiil be sent to the legislature on time. The worst scenario is "no decision"� due to increased traffic and�costs. The Federai inspection Service (FIS) facility project on the Gold Concourse will add 5 to 6 mote intemational gates to accommodate foreign travelers. Currently, intemational flights utilize the HNH Terminal and passengers must use a shuttle bus to the Lindbergh Terminal for connecting flights. The development of an FIS facility on the Goid Concourse will •resuit in more e�cient/convenient processing of intemational passengers making MSP more competitive in foreign air service. Steps towa�d improving retail at the tenninal wili aiso be made in �n effort to become more competitive. The anticipated compietion date of the FIS project is September 1996. Portions of the south paraliei Runways (11 R/29L) will be closed for major reconstruction potentiaily commencing in eariy 1997. During the first two phases of the constnaction, app�oximately 3200' of each end of the Runway wiii be reconstructed including associated work on Taxiway A. This will allow approximately 6000' of the Runway to �emain in service. ,. The reconstruction of the remaining center portion (3300') wili require a total runway closure (� some time after 1997, but it has not been scheduled yet. Reconstruction of Runway 11 R/29L is critical from a maintenance/safety standpoint and cannot be delayed. There wiil be noise impacts to�the north on a temporary basis during constnaction. Mr. Hamiel informed the council that Chairman Grieve has been thoroughiy briefed on MASAC and the Part 150 Programs. The Commissioners have not forgotten about MASAC and are sensitive to environmental and noise issues. A question/answer session followed.- � ". May 1996 Mitigation Reports from the Metropolitan Council will be shown to MASAC. '` A MAC mailing will go out to all residents explaining the South Parallel Runway closures. � * MSP operation forecasts are continually updated. MAC is ahead on growth projection. Growth is being re-evaluated. * The Reliever Airpo�t System is being examined. * A MASAC/MAC joint meeting will need to be planned at least three months in advance. Staff will coordinate and schedule a target date. y, : 6. Update: Draft New Noise Manaaement Methodoloqv (NNMM) Letters John Foggia reported that the draft letter is complete. 1994 will be estabiished as the baseline year. 1995 wili be used as a comparison year. 1996 becomes the first compliance year. Within the next two weeks, the letter will be mailed and will include an explanation of how the baseline was established for each of the airlines. Northwest Airlines is on board covering 82% of operations. 7. Briefing: INTERNET The MAC Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs will be using the Intemet as the next step used for information dissemination - which is one of MASAC's Charters. The Intemet is another information management tool which staff is• trying to implement to supplement an original capability that came from the noise complaint hotline. The Intemet is a significant way to serve the public who is interested in retrieving information through computer technology, and offers ways for staff to interFace with technological partners [Honeywell, etc.]. The Intemet is also a powerful tool to communicate directly between other airports in the U.S. and worldwide. Using ATIS on phone lines is another option intended to be used for information dissemination, along with b�oadcasting information on Cable television. Roy Fuhrmann, Supervisor Aviation Noise & Satellite P�ograms, presented an overview of the Intemet which included: wfiat is the Intemet, origin/history, growth, and cuRent users. There are multitudes of users which include federal and state agencies, informational service providers, research/academia, and public information sources. Aviation users are capitalizing on Intemet technology. Mr. Fuhrmann elaborated on the specific uses of Intemet for airfines, airports, aviation service providers, airplane/aviation procurement, aviation groups, and travel agents. Denver Intemational Airport's (DIA) Intemet information contains airport layout, description, environmental programs [wate�, energy, clean air, and noise], directions to DIA, technical data, and airlines serving DIA. Miami Intemational Airport's (MIA) information includes MIA mission, airport description, development contracts, airside business promotions, domestiGintemational marketing statistics, and airport technical data. Currently there are 26 major aitports across the U.S. with Intemet connecfions. Mr. Fuhrmann reviewed items to be included on the Home Page: Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs, ANOMS, GIS, GPS, State Report. MAC information will include mission, purpose, and operating philosophy. 8. Persons Wishing to Address the Council None 9. Report of MAC Commission Meetinq October 16 1995 Chairman Johnson reported that a representative from Denver gave a briefing against the construction of the new Denver I�temational Airport. , ) 4 � 10: 11 Other items Not on the AQenda The minutes of the Operations Committee on October 12, 1995, were distributed for review. Shouider Houcs, and correspondence directed to the council will be addressed at the November Operations Committee meefing. � Mike Schlax announced that the City of Eagan is having an open forum on the Dual Track, November 15, 1995. Adioumment Chairman Johnson adjoumed the meeting at 9:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted: � Jean Deighton, Secretary UPCOMING MEETING DATES Full Commission December 18, 1995 1:00 p.m.- Room 303 Planning & Environment Committee December 5, 1995 5 MASAC January 23, 1996 7:30 p.m. � C , _ � . • � i • ! • 1 ♦ , ; ,► 0 January 23 June 25 � � /• . September 24 October 22 Decen�ber 3 e 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. A� E N �/`1 METROPO�ITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL Generai Meetina JANUARY 23, 1996 T:30 p.m. to 9:15 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota Caii fio Orde�, Roll Cali , Approvai of Minutes of Meeting Decembe� 5� 1995 Intr�oduc�ion af invited Guests Receipt of Communications Technical Advisor's Rurnvay System Utilization Report and Complai� Summary Update: Pa�t 150 Sound Insulation Program by Steve Vecchi Update NNMM: Report on Determination of Baseline Year Value by John Foggia Report of the Operations Committee Meefing January 17, 1996 by MaHc Saimen � Report of the MAC Commission Meeting January 16, 1996 Persons Wishing to Address the Counai Other items Not on the Agenda Adjoumment Next Meeting: February 27, 1996 Notes Only designated MASAC >: repre'sentati4es seated at tne table wtll be ; _ :;:• allowed fa vofe � � � C �� _ t MINUTES METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING DECEMBER 5, 1995 7:30 p.ttio 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis� Minnesota 1. Call to Order Roli Call The meeting was called to order by Chairman Bob Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and the secretary was asked to call the roll. The following members vvere in attendance: Mark Salmen Jennifer Sayre Brian Bates Peggy Hillman Bob Johnson John Smith Jim Serrin Joe Lee � Mike Teegardin Scott Bunin Caroi McGuire Tom Hueg �ewis Higgins Don Priebe Jamie Verbrugge Petrona Lee John Nelson Vem Wlcox Jon Hohenstein Mike Schlax Joe Leuman (substitute) Ed Porter Dale Hammons Manny Camilon 1 Northwest Northwest Airbome • UPS MBAA Minneapolis Chambe� of Commerce Minneapolis ' Minneapolis Minneapolis St. Paul St. Paul i St. Paul St. Paui Richfield Richfield Bloomington Bloomington Bloomington Eagan Eagan Mendota Heights Bumsville Inver Grove Heights St. �ouis Park � � :� Advisors Bruce Wagner Cindy Green Ron Glaub John Foggia Tra�i Erickson Guests Jan DelCalzo Dean Lindberg Approval of Minutes FAA FAA FAA Technical Advisor MAC ANOMS Specialist Minneapolis SMAAC The minutes of the October 24, 1995, meeting were approved as presented. Introduction of.lnvited Guests Receipt of Communication No invited guests. Chairman Johnson recognized Mr. Dean Lindberg, President of SMAAC. A letter was received from the City of St. Paul appointing Thomas Hueg as the MASAC representative (replacing Craig Wruck), and Lewis Hig�ins, Jr. as a new altemate member. Mr. Higgins introduced himself to the Council. l.etters were received from the cities of Inver Grove Heights, Sunfish �ake, Mendota Heights, and Eagan, asking MAC to take action on various noise abatement issues including: expansion of the nighttime hours, and relief from extended operations over Inver Grove Heights. Chairman Johnson refeRed all correspondence to the Operations Committee for review and response. ' Chairman Johnson reported that on December 5, the MAC Planning and Environment Committee recommended to the full Commission that Resolution No. 638? f�om the City of Inver Grove Heights be forwarded to MASAC for analysis and.evaluation, and that MASAC report back to the Planning and Environment Committee within 60 days. The Resolution requested. that MAC and/or FAA change the tuming order procedure for aircraft departing to the southeast so that aircraft are tumed toward their destination at �the end of the 3-mile corridor to keep unnecessary and excessive flights over Inver Grove Heights to a minimum. Chairman Johnson refeRed this issue to the Operations Committee. Technical Advisor's Runwav Svstem Utilization Repo�t and Complaint SummarY The Technical Advisor's report for the month of October was distributed and reviewed by John Foggia. Points of interest included: �a C C * Continued good news in the trend for Stage 3 utilization at MSP - 50.9%. * 32 NWA DC9-30s have been hush kitted as of the end of November, and 34 are scheduled for completion by the end of December. * Included in the 1264 noise complaint total are 650 complaints from one individual in Eagan. * The flow of traffic during the month of October was to the northwest - 62% of the amvals occurred over Eagan and Inver Grove Heights depicting the effects of wind. * RMT 12 is still out of service. It will be operational again in less than 2 weeks. * A new flight track base map utilizing GIS coverages will be displayed in the January 1996 Technical Advisor's Report. The new base map will be displayed in a larger size in order to determine whether or,not the larger size is necessary. Jim Serrin, Minneapolis, called attention to a 95.5dB reading at RMT #3 from a B747 Stage 3 aircraft. John Foggia explained the methodology behind certifying an aircraft as Stage 2 or Stage 3(FAR Part 36). Staff will check on the nature of this particular overtlight and report back to MASAC. � 5. Approval of 1996 MASAC Meetina Dates The 1996 meeting dates were included in the MASAC package and distributed to all members. � 1 Scott Bunin. St. Paul, moved and Petrona �ee, Bloominaton, seconded, to approve the 1996 " meeting dates as presented. A vote was taken and unanimouslv passed. 6. Report of the Operations Committee Meetinq November 17, 1995 Operations Committee Chairman Mark Salmen reviewed the minutes of the November 17, 1995 meeting. A copy of the minutes, and report package were distributed to all members. The agenda items included contour generation status, shoulder hour data analysis, NADPs, correspondence response, and discussion of MASAC/MAC joint meeting. A copy of the Operations Committee minutes and report package is available by request from the MASAC Secretary. Chairman Johnson added that communications are on-going to a�range for MAC Chairman Grieve to address MASAC. 7. Persons �shing to Address the Council None. ( j 8. Other items Not on the Aqenda John Nelson, Bloomington, noted that completion of the New Noise Management Methodology ( was a MASAC goal to be accomplished in 1995. John Foggia responded that some of the letters were mailed today. Problems determining baseline value, and locating the correct person to whom the letter shouid be sent, are the reasons for delay. A report on baseline and how it was calculated wiil be reported at the January MASAC meeting. A sample letter will also be distributed: John Nelson Bloominaton moved and Scott Bunin seconded, that MASAC endorse the use of the INTERNET for information dissemination bv MAC Aviation Noise and Satellite staff. A vote was taken and unanimously passed. 9. Adioumment Chairman Johnson adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Jean Deighton, Secretary 4 � C 1 1 i i •. i' .' February 12, 1996 To: Airport Relations Commission From: Kevin Batchelder, Interirm City A'�� Subject: Discnss Noise Abatement Departure Profiles DISC�TSSION On Tanuary 17, 1996, the MASAC Operations Committee reviewed the analysis on the Noise Abatement Departure Profiles (NADP) presented by Evan Futterman, of HNTB Consulting. Mr. Futterman presented noise contour analysis of both a Distant procedare and its alternative, the Close-In procedur�e. However, the analysis was incomplete because there was no cumula.tive noise contours, only single event contour analysis. (Please refer to MASAC Operations Committee mtnutes for January 17, 1996 included in the Vari.ous Reports section of your agenda. packet.) ' l� ) A Special MASAC Opera.tions Committee meeting is being held on Frida.y, February 16, 1996 to review cumulative contour analysis that will include population counts within the contours. The intent of this meeting is to allow cities time to rea.ct prior to the February 26, 1996 MASAC meeting, at which time MA.0 staff and consultants will make a presentation to MASAC for their recommendation to the MAC Planning and Environment Committee. i ' � 1' 1 Discuss Noise Abatement Depariure Profiles and provide staff with any appropria.te directions. THRUSTS � � N A 6> N O N A O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O i . .. i . i .� . . . . i . . . . .i 0� W m W .P O O O O �.. � O O O N O O O O N CJ1 O O O W 0 _v � 0 � o D z n w rn � 0 0 a A O O O O .� w � �„ V G� O m �P c0 � W (� � � V v � V �O �D i V V �A v c� � c� r ' O tn m Z v m -o a � � C � rn � , i ' THRUSTS N A m 00 O N �P O O O O O O O � O O O O O p O O m N � W �P N W O � � '�S W <Ji V W O � i <.n rn V v�\ �♦ � � � -i n Z � v m -o � � � C � m C� C C 0 0 w rn w A � O O O C ..i � O O O N O O O O N t1� O O O W 0 v_ o 0 � � -� a z � w m �" 0 0 0 .A 0 0 0 0 .� w � �, V Ui O � .t� t0 � W (� uA cii v � J V � � J v J � ' � THRUSTS � 0 0 0 0 0� o 0 v n . � v m 'o D � C � rn � 0 0 rn cfl w �.A 0 0 0 0 � tii 0 0 0 N O O 0 0 N tn 0 0 0 v � w -� o n o z � n o m w � 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 a o� 0 0 0 0 v a� 0 0 0 v v 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 0 THRUSTS 0 0 �o 0 0� o 0 0 V N v t.� 0 O � -i D G� • m � n r O N rn z v rn -� a � � c � rn � THRUSTS 0 0 0 o Go 0 0 0 o� . . .. , .. r... . ... . . -i ... . � .,. . .... i . . :.__ . . , ��-t tJt tD v ... N �P Vt 0 v � � a w z ,� n m N � w � A V N `d td O O � � � A . � � � .� � � D Z --i � m -o a � � C � rn C� 0 0 rn cD w � 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 N O O O O N � 0 0 0 � � o a o z o � m W � 0 0 0 .� 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 0 0 � � 0 0 0 V V O O O J � 0 0 � � THRUSTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y N � N O O .�. . (A A � m w ... v rn -o � �� c � rn � � , r ALTITUDE � N W � p O O O O O � p p O O O t� � O O O O . Q 3634 10000 15n00 20�00 25000 30000 v � D 35000 z n m 40000 43957 50645 6391E 77175 9177� 11215! � c� r O � m z v . � co � m '4 A � C � m FED-02-1996 14 23 METRO. AIRPORT COMM. 612 726 5296 P.02i02 M�1Y1��g�11 ITEM 8 i � TO: Planning and Environrnent Committee FFaOM: Richard B. Keinz, Director of Environment (726-8134) SU�'IECT: Inver G�ove Heights Resafution RE: Comdor Procedures DATE: January 29, 1996 Ai the December meeting of ths Planning and Environment Committee, action was #aken io forward the sttached Inver Grove Heights Resotution io MASAC for analysis and evaluation. The Committee further requested MASAC report back within 60-days. The Ope�atio�s Committee of MASAC considered the resolution at its meeting on January 96, '{ 996. After considerable discussion by the Operafions Committee membe�s� it was once again determined that aircraft could nat a!I be directed to tum precisely at three mifes as fhe Resolution requests. MAC staff offered a modification ta the wording of the current MSP �'"�M,� Tower Orde� that clarifies the' intent of the Tower Order to tum aircraft as soon as pracficai after the 3-mile point. FAA tower staff assured the Operations Cammittee that this is the cuRent practice and the clarifica#ion will have no real affect on operations, Inver Grove Heights rep�esentatives understood but agreed with this minor clarification. The propaseci change to the Tower Order and action taken are reflected in the atfached minutes of the � MASAC Opetations Comrnittee. This request for revised wording of #he Tower Order was approved and forwarded to MASAC for actian with the City of Eagan dissenting. MASAC took up the recammendation of the Operatio�s Cammitfee at its regutacly scheduled meeting on January 23� 1996. After some discussion the revised wording of fhe Tower Order was approved as a recammandation to forward to the Planning and Environment Committee. The motion was approved by a majo�ity vofe. ; � COMMITTEE ACT10N REQUESTED Recommend to the full Gommission ihaf MAC staff be directed to requesf that FAA modify the wording in the current MSP Towe� Order relating to operations in the Eaga�-Mendota Heights Corridor: from: prr�ceed on the heading assigned unti! at /east 3-miles fmm the deparfure end of the runway. to: praceed on fhe heading assigned until af least 3-miles from the departure end of fhe runway, and assign on-course headings as soon as piactica! at%r the 3-mile point. 1-Ti�f.l��[:3�.� i C �. • January 17, 1996 NIGEL FI2dNEY METROPOLITAN AZRPORTS 6040 2$TH AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAFOLIS, MN 55450 Dear Mr. Finney: COMMIS3ION THOMAS EGAN Mayor PATRICIA AWADA SHAWN HUNTER SANDRA A. MASIN THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Adminisftator E. J. VAN OVERBEKE City Cierk In acticn ��;�ai� �i: its meeting of January 16, the Eagan City Council voted to support a modification of the off-peak corridor procedures for the north parallel runway, shifting the off-peak heading from 105 degrees to 110 deg�ees. Upon review of the history and background information r�lative to this issue, the Council determined that such a correction would offset the five degrees of magnetic�shift whiah has occurred since the corridor procedures were implemented. Any consideration of a modification in excess of this should be subject to a complete environmental review with opportunities for public education and input. � The Council opposes a shift of fifteen degrees from 105 degrees to runway centerline, because a lesser change would provide as much benefit on the north side of the corridor without redirecting aircraft as far to the south and bec�use violations of existing corridor procedures already create a greater noise nuisance in neighborhoods south 'of the corridor than to the. nortii. This is demonstrated by the monthly ANOMS reports of corridor compliance which routinely show less than one percent excursions on the north and more than ten percent excursions on the south. In taking this action, the City of Eagan wishes.to be responsive to the needs r..of its neighbor, but we cannot justify suppox�ing a change which will unnecessarily exacerbate the impaats on our citizens. Please share this letter with the Federal Aviation Admin�.stration and other appropriate parties. Sincerely, `\ ��crrN�. � � Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Mayor Charles Mertensotto, Mendota Heights John Foggia, MAC MUNICIPAI CENTER 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 661-4600 FAX: (612) 681-4612 TDD:(612)454-8535 THE LONE OAK TREE � THE SYMSOI OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Afiirmative Actlon Employer MAINTENANCE FACILtTY 3501 COACHMAN POINT EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122 PHONE: (612) 681-4300 FAX; (612) 681-4360 T�D: (612) 454-8535 C � � �' � � ► �. _ January 18, 1996 Nigel Finney Metropolitan AirPorts Commission 6040 28th Avenue South Mi.nneapolis, MN 55450 Dear Mr. Finney: This letter is to inform you that the City Council of Mendota Heights, at its 7anuary 2, 1996 meeting, unanimously endorsed t�e Metropolitan. Airpoits Commission's (MAC) Comdor Refinement Proposal #1 for Non Simultaneous Depariure Conditions. Proposal #1 is as follows: � Whenever possible, under non-simultaizeous departure condiiions: * .Aircraft departing Runway 11R will be assigaed a heading to maintain an appro�mate ground track of 105 degrees (1V�. ' : * Aircraft departing Runway 11L will be assigned a heading to maintain a ground track along the egtended runway centerline, approgimately 118 degre�s (n'n• _ As proposed and approved by the MAC aad FAA-MSP, Praposal #1 will allow departing aircraft from Runway 11L and Ruaway 11R to stay in the center of the Mendota. Heights/ Eagan Corridor to the greatest extent possible during non-simultaneous, or off-peak, departure periods. This refinement will allow the Corridor to function as originally intended. The Mendota. Heights City Council believes that the FAA-Great Lakes Region should conclude that a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSn is warranted, based on the analysis and . environmental review by MAC and its consultant, HNTB, that has been performed to date. This analysis indicates that any defined impacts are de minimis and significantly below the FAA's standards for impacts that would warra.nt further environmental review. The City Council urges MAC and the FAA to move forward with Proposal #1 for immediate implementation now that the necessary environmental reviews have been satisfied. The City of Mendota Heights expresses its appreciation to MAC staff and to the Federal � � Aviation Administration for its assistance during these Comdor Refinement discussions. The - implementa.tioa of Proposal #1 represents a logical culmination to all the efforts by the .�.,�,�. �< �,:,�,�r,�- . .�: 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViI�T • 55118 452 • 1850 C� • a � � Mr. Nigel Finney January 18, 1996 Page two var.ious parties involved. The City of Mendota. Heights strongly supports MAC Proposal #1 ancl �looks forward to its immediate implementation. Sincerely, ��.�,.� � �,..�-..�- . Charles E. Mertensotto � Ma.yor cc: �M�ay\ ro� as�Ega\, City of Eagan � Bruce Wagoner, FAA Feb-12-96 -"•2-09P R�land & �'-+rten �--a-jto !��, 612 22?-^,4755 � ) � ' MINUTES (VU�SAC QPERATIOIVS COMMITTEE January 1?� 199fi The meeting was he(d at the Metropolitan Airports Commissian General Office North Viking Roam, and calied to order at The foilowing members were in attendance: Mark Saimen, NWA - Chairman, Jennife� Say�e, NWA (Alternate} Bob Johnsan - MBAA Chuck Curry - AI.PA ' . John Ne(son - Btoomington Tom Hueg - St. Paul Mayor Mertensotto - Mendota Heights Kevin Batchelder - Mendota Heights ( Altennafe) Jor� Hohenstein - Eagan CharEes Curry - ALPA A vi ry: John Foggia - Technical Advisor Roy Fuhrmsnn - MAC i ) Traci Erickson - MAC ` t?enis Cornell - FAA ; l . � , HNTB NADP Cantours City of Inver Grave Neights Proposal Shaulder Hour Anafysis MASAC Communications MASAC Goals and Objectives Evan Futterman - HNTB Kimberty Hughes - HNTB The reports packages distributed at the meeting are an integral part of the meeting information and are attached to the minutes your review. ►L�' •► • : Evan Futterman, HNTB, reviewed and explained the NADP Distant procedure, and the alternative, Clase-in procedure. Evan Futterman and Kimberly Hughes, HNTB, reviewed the resuJts of the NADP contour analysis completed to date: 80 dBA Lmax �ntours for the DC9-30, 8727, and OC9-30 hushed airc�aft. 1 Feb- 1 z-96 ' 2: lOP R� �l and &'` �rtens^tto %"�l 612 Z2i�4755 � P. 03 � 7 Thrust cut-back charts were distri6uted a�d reviewed on DC9 Ctose-in Departure (not hushed�, DC9 Oistant Departure, 6�27-20Q {Stage 5) Close-in Departure, and BT27-200 (Stage 5j Distant { Departure. Mr. Futterman reviewed ihe graphics and how tF�ese procedures differ. � A consideration mentianed, is that beyottd the yeat 2000, 21( the non-hush kitted DC9 and 8727 fleet will be gone, NWA already retired three 8727's and has hush kitted 36 aircraft. A re- evaluatiort of the recommendec! NADP's in place can be done later and then changed - if there is a need to do so. Most airports across the U.S. are familiar with both NADP profiies. Char(es Curry, informed the commiftee that he campleted a study on NAQP's for the Air Line PiloCs Association and found the Distant procedure is almost atways the standard. Some carriers have not addressed the issue at a1i. . Noise sensitive areas will be fuRhe� assessed within the contours for populatian count. The population anaEysis comparing Close-in and Disfant procedures, and DNl contour anaiysis to assess the cumulative effects of Cfose-in and Distant NAOP profiles, will be presented b,y Evan Fu;t�rrr�an, HNTE3, at a Special Qperations Gomrnittee meeting February 16. Another SpeciaJ Operatians Committee wiil be scheduled February 26 in order to finalize a recommendation to MASAC. John Foggia ar an HNTB representative will rhake a presentation to MASAC ort Feb�uary 27 and open discussion to members of the Cauncil. With this time-line in place, the NADP profile tecommendation would #hen be forwarded to ihe MAC Planning & Environment Committee in April, the MAC Ful! Commission in May, and could conceivably be implemented by m;d-May. 1NVER GROVE HElGHTS PROPOSai A let#er dated Septembet 29, 1995 to MAC Commissioner Patrick 4'Nei1t (Chair of the MAC � Planning 8� Environme�t Committee) from Linda J. Cummings, Staff Representative, lnver Grove Heights Aircraft noise Abatement Commission (ANAC), communicated mis-in%rmatian and many inaccuracies regarding noise issues in that community. John Foggia responded to that letter and included a chronology of Cor�idor devetopment/refinement from 1968 to 1995, and a chronotogy of official meetings with Inve� Grove Heights/MAC Rep�esentatives where r�solutians. w�itten - coresspondence, and mis-informatian propagated by ANAC were discussed and ctarified. The tette� further requested that Chairman O'Neil( place RESOI.UTION NO. 6387 on an upcoming rneeting agenda, which was complied with December 1995 and assigned to ttie MASAC Operations Committee for a proposat within 60 days. •• The tnver Grove Heights Resolution requests change to MSP Tower �rder wording... from: "Proceed on the heading assigned until at least 3-rnites from the departure end of the runway." �: "Proceed on the heading assigned untit at least 3 miles f�am the departure end of the runway, and assign on-course headings 3s soan as practica! after the 3-mile point." John Foggia reiterated that MSP's TRACON atready uses best efforts to turn ai�craft heading south, southwest or west, on-course as soon as possi6le; MAC staff recommend the �equested wording change. The wo�ding change retains the spirit of the existing order, but clarifi,es an impo�tant point Feb-12-96 ' 2: lOP R� +land 8°'�rten� tto -•� 612 22�" 4755 ^�. P.04 F ta downstream communities. Denis Cornetl. FAA, communicated that this change woufd not affect aircraft operaEions. Aircrai� aiready turn as soon as possible after passing the 3-mile turn restriction area. • . •t� ►= •� : •�!! 1! •1 l • -• .�• :�� •It •l V�.. - ��:• �. �- ��• • • ll ti 1 : : . - � � � : � • c . � � • t = �/ � • . _ � � - - � - : • t � ' • • � • 's S � j- • 1 - • - _ i , . s" 1 1� •ta- • t _�11/1;f�. • • {� •�t ,l � -t • • `�. •ll" • ►L� � .�1 • � t �! 1'! •Ilfl l:- - i► •Illl •� </� i= �: � �a .�- .� •- r�l .i -.t`• . � • �l" 1! • i= • . � . l � • o i . . � - � . � � • . - � + . 1 •I: • cl • � • ' • �i ■�1't ' 1 .,�.� • � ; ■ � ► Z \ : - � 11 � S � 11 ll � . • John Foggia reported that three of the communications (Sunfish Lake, EagBn, lnver Grove Heights} receiv�d Dy MASAC and forwarded to the Operatio�s Commitiee related to the "shoulder hours" and wil! be covered under this age�da item. Staff already responded to the letter from inver Grove Heights regarding ihe Corridor and the 3-mile turr�, as mentioned above. Mr. Foggia reviewed the attached analysis requested at the November 17 Operations Committee meeting which inctuded three shoulder haur anaiysis graphics depicting average numbe� af operations in 15-minute intervats from 2200 - 24Q0 hours and 0500 -OT00 hours during Ju1y-August- September 1995 for: (1j ail jet carriers, (2) Stage 3/Stage 2 jets and {3} Stage 3/Stage 2 jeis with Stage 2 discouraged after 10:3f1 p.m. The MAC Airc�aR Noise and Satellite Program staff considered alt the data and noted the following: —� Between 10:00 p.m. tv midnight and 5:08 a.m, to typica(ly drop befow two operations per 15-minute practical "floor" fot operationalty densify. 7:00 a.m., jet aperations do not interval. This appears ta be a -�� It may be passible to add a voluntary Stage 3 oRly axterision to ihe current quiet hours {11:Q0 p.m.to 6:00 a.m.) by shifting some Stage 2 operatio�s into time periods before '[�:30 p,m, Tt�e attached charts which were reviewed above show this c(early. •�� Because of exisiing operations after 6:00 a.m., no refinements appear to be possible. A discussion session ensued and the following was noted. 6etween 10:30 p.m. and 11;Q0 p.m., Northwest currently has three sc�eduled operations (two arriv�Is and vne departures) according to #he most recent schedule. Two of the operations are Stage 3 and one operation is Stage 2. A restriction prohibiting "passenger' flights is regulated by the FAA, Part 16i action. John Nelson, 8loomington, pointed out: (1) The Ldn65 is a 1d:d0 p.m, to 7;00 a.m. noise metric. Any Stage 2 operations during the nighttime hours penalize the airpart in terms of noise contour ',. ) and the FAA in terms of mitigation_ One operation at night couid equate to ten daytime aperations. Feb-12-96 ' 2: lOP Rr�vland S� !"-zrtenc^�tto e`�'^� 61Z Z2�4755 � P.05 ` 7 � � _, We are out-of-step with federat guidelines with respect to our noise metric hours. (2) Correspondence from the communities surrounding the airport are requesting lirnitations or , restrictions to scheduled nighttime operations which are already at rock bottom. (3} We al�eady � have federa( covenants estabtished which do not a(low an increase of Stage Z operations. The best ` option in the shvulder haut time period is with Stage 3 movement. Considering a!I scheduled operations, there are currently only two Stage 2 oparations scheduied between 10:3Q to 11:00 p.m. Mayar Mertensotto, Mendota Heights, suggested focusing an the public relation factor. Emphasize what is already in place. Thera is no room for additional large changes within the shoulder hours. We need movement, even if they are small changes. Chairrrian Salmen relayed that from a Narthkvest Airline perspective, nothing mo�e can be done between 6:00 to 7:00 a.m. 1Ne need to conduct additional analysis, and cancentrate on positioning and scheduling flights between 10:30 to 11:00 p.m. -with no Stage 2 operations. , Jennifer Sayre, Northwest, said that other airlines operating out ot MSP may not be as accommodating - and some facus needs to be placed here. NoRhwest staff offered to potl the other airlines regarding changing to all Stage 3 during 10:30 to 11;00 p.m. Kevin Batchelder, related that Mendota Heights recommended by letter {November 1995) to MAC Chai�man, Sandy Grieve, that steps be taken to negotiate new nighttime agreemer�ts with the air carriers to limit scheduled operations between the hours of 14:3Q to 6:00 a.m, Mr. Batcheider said that new Voluntary Agreements between 10:34 to 'C 1:00 p.m. should be inves[igated aind negotiated by MAC staff and the carriers - and then move on the issue for this incremental change. Mr, Foggia interjected that the goal is to �educe Stage 2 operations, not to �educe flights, Northwest will �eport bacic to the Operations Gommittee at the February 16 meeting o� whethe� or not it is feasibEe for the other carriers at MSP to replace Stage 2 ope�ations with Stage 3 between 10:30 to 11;00 p.m. MASAC GOALS AND QBJECTIVES Due to the tate hour, this agenda item was deferred to the next �'meeting. The next Operations Committee meeting wiil-be held Febru�ry 16, 1996 at 9:30 a.m. T'he meeting was adjourned at 4:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Jea� Deighton Committee Secretary 4 (_. _ _.. _. _ \ Tf�: FI2i�1VI: SUBJECT: DATE: , � � ' ��'� 1VIASAC Operati.ons Committee DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT John Foggia, Manager, Aviation Noise and Satellite Program (ANSP) Shoulder Hour Considerations 17 January 1996 , HNT� NADF Contour Generation. Evan Futterman and Kimberly Hughes of Howard Needles Tainmen & Bergendoff (HNrI�), will present resul.ts of 1Voise Abatement Departure Procedure (NADP) contour analysis. Completed are 80 dBA I,n,� contours for DC9-30, B727, and hushed DC930 aircraft. ]Popularion analysis comparing "close-in" versus "distant" procedures are not yet availa.ble. Additionally, DNL contour analysis is undesway, to assess the cumulative effects of "close-in" and "distant" NADP profiles. ' "Shoulder" Hour Data Analysis. At the 16 November 1995 MASAC Operations Committee meeting, ANSp staff provided data. analyses of three recent high traffic volume months at MSP - July 1995, August 1995, and September 1995. Included below is an excerpt from the 16 November 1995 Ops Committee memo, deseribing the natiue of the analyses. Recluested analyses from �e previous MASAC Operations Committse iqcluded a refinemeat of pre- vious analyses, focusing on 10 P.M. to Muinight, and 5 A.M. to 7 A.M The most receat availabie ANOMS data was used in the analysis. i:e., July. August, and September 1995. The data sample included 87 nights for the 10 P.M. to Midnight period, and 88 mornings for the 5 AM. to 7 A.M. period. Almost 5600 Carrier Jet operations were considered in this sample. The data reflect F�ederal '�Pr� $Y�8 re-eagiaed and hushkitted B-727s. and Northwest flying 309'0 (23 of 7'n of their DC9-30 aircraft as Stage 3. 'hvo attached summaries reflect analyses of operations by 15-minute increments, with a Stage 2/ Stage 3 tueakout, and an analysis of arrivals and depsrh�res by runway, by 15-minute increment dur- ing both 10 P.M, to Ivfidnight aad 5 A.M. to 7 A.M. periods. . A third aaalysis compares the Consolidated Schedule to actual ANOMS arrival and departure times. The flighYs full itinerary is included as requested. The 15th day of July, August, and September are ��P� �� corresponding scheduled activity. Because the Consolidated. Schedule is only an estimate of daily flight activity for a given montf�, some flights are nnmabched for the mid-poiat day of each month. A nighttime survey of airport restricdnns and/or agreements is also included. An extensive survey of Airports similar to MSP was conducted in March 1995. and disseminated to MASAC. The nighttime snrvey coverefl the same airports to provide some continuity to the process. The original- survey is ( � attached for reference. MSP has a Stage 3-only agreement in force between 11 P.M. and 6 AM., -- with its major carrier Northwest Airlines (NWA) as part of the loan covenants between NWA and MAC. Also part of the loaa covenants are an agreement to utilize at MSP the same proportion of Stage 2 that exists in NWA's domestic fleet, and the proportional utilization of Stage 2 aircraft can- not increase from year to year. These concepts will attempt to be exteaded to all carriers serving Proposed 1996 MASr�C Objectives IViASAC Communications. City Qf Inver Grove Heigh�.s Proposal. Attached. is an Inver Grove Heights (IGI� City Resolution presented to MAC's Planning and Environment Committea in December 1995. Also attached are supporting documents from both IGH and MAC staff as presented to the cominissioners. The MASAC Operations Committee was tasked to review the resolution, develop a proposal, and report back to P&E in 60 days. Jahn Foggia, Manager ANSP, briefe� the IGFI airport relations committee e�ctensively on 10 January 199b, clearing up a number of factual misconceprions. IGH's resolution can be distilled to request that MSP's TRACON use best efforts to turn aircraft heading south, southwest or west, on-course as soon as possible after passing the 3-mile tum restriction area. Though it is understood that it is already in the best interests � � of both air carriers and ATC to turn eligible aircraft on-course as soon as possible, MAC staff recommend - a change to tower order wording in MSP AT 7110.4C, paragraph 7.h.(1)(c) from: Page 3 to ; ,._„ � � _� N "proceed on tt�e heading assigned nntil at least 3 miles from the departure end of the run- way." "proceed on tl� heading assigned until at least 3 miles from the departure end of the nm- way, and assiga on-caurse headings as soon as practical after the 3-mile poin�„ This wording change retains the spirit of the existi.ng order, but clarifies an important point to downsiream cammunities. � Page 4 �I � � �_ + � • r � � r � � / � � � � : � � � �, � � � � � �t'� � � � 7... ..' . • ` . � � ' � ' � � � - - _ ` - � � � � � ' � • • � � � � • • • • � • � � � � � � • �• •• � � . � i • • • � • • • � � � l.* t y. M � S5� it ��.,it N. �� :.4 �5,�i1�S � 1' 1 Fk� ij: t ty. f C i! ! � , � C 0. ��r . • � � � � � � � � � � � O �" (�" {�i?' � � � �3- . . . . � � � � Y � � • • � • � • • � • � • � W � 0 _ � M � � � � � � � � � � � o � O o � NNNNb9� 64 ffl� 6F� ff} • • • r ■ � ♦ � � � •7 • � • • • � r � � 1 � � � • • � � � • � • • � • N N � �t' � w � OT ..{� . • � � ' ` � _ � • � � � - � � . � i � • • • • � • • •• • • • - . � � • • • • •• �� • • • • •� � • .. . . • • • • • . � ' . � � •� • • . • • • • • � • • • • • � �� • • • � � • C' z � o � � H Z � 1 H U H � H Q�', a ' � � � O � A � i U � Z � O � O H A � U O � i � H � W � `� o � � U � 1 z � O � i � O � i H � i � w a � a � w � � �I O Z H W � � U � c� � z� H � �;W � � a w� � U1 � w W � O O � i � x � c7 � z � H � z � W � a � o � W � � t� A� � � M O 00 N al L� �-i Cl O O O W N N c-1 N e-1 rl N r-I M N N N � a � tn a � � o � .ct s� � � h h � c�n o z A h w � � N � 00 l0 M OD . U'I � L� di 01 lU C+') r-1 p{ � � � � N U O N � N c�d � � h,h � cn o z A h w � N � GO �p M 00 tn � � � � l4 M c-i � � � U�� U l N � � cd � � h h �i i O � (� h Cs+ � i i � i d� N � f'r1 i i i � l0 t.f) N l� N N l0 N CO ttl M C� N N N N N N N N C�7 � � � a � h h � c°'n o z Q h w � �C � � � o co �.n o ,--� r-+ rn � � ao � o N �-I rl N r-I N r-I r-I N � � ¢+ � h h � � O Z � �1 h C� � �C � d+ N t'`� l0 LCl N l� l0 CO tll M C� � r-�i t71 Ra .i� ✓ U � N cd t1+ � � � � � U O N td [�, � r-� � h h �C cn O � (.� h ,..� oo � � � w �o .-i a o 0 0 ao � � � � � � � � � � � 00 Ci1 O �-1 N M d� L(1 l0 [� 00 al rn rn o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � � � � � � � � � r �t+ cn r �n cv r �t+ ao �o cn � � � � � � � � � � � � � � A N � ?� � � fi f�, � � U h C.�u � � � h h � U�1 O Z Q � ro b .r., N x � � � � ro � ro '� � A ro � � � � N U t�" 'M 3 0 ro a � 0 .� � U � � � 01 O U x � � � �o � C �� • • r � r • •• • • • •• . . . • • . . • •1 . . C/1 � -j-� � � 0 U � �. � O � � � `O � O � N � .� � CC3 � W ■ ,i � _ _ _ _ _ __ _ � , �� 1 ' . t'' ''' 1 ' 1 i;i 1 1''' 1 1� � 1 1 1 i' � 1 1 il •': , . L�� : �' � : �' �. � � ��. �� i ��'�� l��t�� i � � � : � ��• �� 1� �� • � � ��• �� " �� . �� . ��: � �� i�►�r� � �• � � �� : � �� . � �� !��'' �� • � �� . �� . , �r�� , . ,,. ,,. ,,, �� .,, ,. � ,. „ �� ..: , , ,., „ .. „ �� ,. ., ,. �� • ,„ ,, .., �� .. ., ,,, ,. �� _ � �� ., ,. ,,. i��i� � � � ■�_�� ..• � i� .. ��:r�' ., .. ,,, �� • ', �' �� 0 Noise Man�ement 1Vlethodology 1995 Air Caa~rier Perforaxiance 1995 Av Dail Av Dail Av Dail Total Percent Percent Total Airline ST3 OPS ST2 OPS Totai OPS Operations Sta�e 3 Sta�e 2 Month TOTAL 371.25 413.57 784.$2 251927 47.4% 52.6% 11 C C �: . �` • 1 1 1 1�, ' 1 �, � . � �. • . .` 1994 Av Dail Av Dait Av Dail Total Percent �irline ST3 OPS S�'2 OPS Total OPS Operations Stage 3 TOTAL 304.60 456.27 762.87 269370 39.9% 60.1% 12 � '9 1 ;': •�. ,, '.,: • : • � • ��-. ' ,�: , '�� ' � � � .,.�: , � ., '. � - , � .� ', �. �. � �� • ' ��. �r1�11�� •. '� , ��. �. : ��I�� , ' I • ��.'�. • 7,' � � , �,�' 1 , '� �' �'1: , 1Y � �. , �. ,� � � -�-� � � 1 ____- ,_�,_''I � 1 � , �.� � � � � �■�� ■, � � � ' � �� , 1 1 � .�. � 1 1 ' � , � 1 ' � , � � �� :� � �'� . !� �'.��1,. � i� � � � ��i � � �'� I � � ��i � I � � , �i � . �,�� • ��. � ��. �� s� � � � � � ��a�� ' � � ' � �� . �� •, Ot �j"i�Zi� � �� , �� . 0� � �� , �� , ��:� �.s'�� ' �� ' , �� i � � , �v � �� . � ��. �� , 0� �'�■ � �� i�� Ii�� ', �� , 0� �' � �� : � : • � �', �� 1•, �, �� .�� 1� �-,�� '. , 1 �'� ,�� • � �� • • 1� �'� � �'� �� , � 1 1 .�� ' � � 1 ' � ■ ■'�� i .� 1� � �: . 1 �: �-. I•, •• ', 1�� 1�1 � �� '. ,�� 1'� �- tll�, �� 1 1 1 � 1 1,� � � 1'� 1 �'�� 1�� 1 �1 1 1� �� 1'. 1 �', ��_�� i � � � � ��1 � � ' . � � � ' , ��1 �.�.i� � � � � � �' � � ��1 � � � � , � � � � , � �� i �� 1 � ��. �� , � �� '.� ��', �� r ��0�� ' , � � � , �� ; i!� � � •1��'��, �' �','� � �� • ' �� TOTAL 1.40 5.20 6.60 2117 21.2% 78.8% 11 t 11�, � 11 1 , , �, .. � �� S�'3 ST2 T'O'TAL Projected �vg �agiy Avg Daiiy �vg na�iy �'otal Yearly Percent OPS OPS Jet Ol'S Jet OPS Stage 3 Jan 1996* 406.6 393.8 800.4 � 292146 50.8% 1995* * 372.7 418.8 � 791.4 288866 47.1 % 1994 304.6 458.3 762.9 278448 39.9% * OAG Derived Data for Consolidated Schedule **June 1995 ANOMS Radar Data Missing Aviation Noise aad Satellite Program P�r��nt Stage 2 49.2% 52.9% 60.1 % 1994 and 1995 Data from ANOMS C� % , • /I '_""_"'"'_.��..�i�i�.iii�iiii/iii////////////////�� ■ ��r� Minneapolis / S't Paul International �irpori .._. . � .... �� . � _ "— �� MOIVTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Airport Sound Abatement Council ct,a;mwn Robert P. Johnooa Vice CMirnran: s�e ea� Technied Advitor: - _ ..�=%6n Fo�a � Secntary: J� n�,wo �Airborne Fxgnea: e� sae�. AirTmmport Araociatian: Pmil McGraw AGPA: Chada W. Curry Jr. ctry ofetow,t;�qron: Pefmoa Lee Vem Wilco: c;ry yr&v,w;tte: Joen Rlrae cty ��8�,,: Tom Egn City cflrtvesGrove HaighGr: n�e�,�. Ciry cf Mendota Heigher: 7i119miih City ofM(nneapol'u: Imma a 9errin Jdm Rkhtcr Joe [.ee J«uW Dod¢e c;ry �ye;�n�m: GeoeEe Kaena• Doo Priebe CiycfSt.LouiaPant: � x�+ aa� c;r� �sr. p�: s�a� c�c.w�,a� carot nm et�c�re De(ta AirLimrinc.: �� m Fedem/E:preaa: 'r� xhao«t Fedeml Aviation AalmitixhvBon: Bru¢e Wngona u�a c�,t, MACStaf�t Dtdc Rdns MBM: Robert P. Jahnem Mmabn Narfhwuf Airlint: r�..�p,nt�c�e Mehopolitan Airpwlr Coiyairrion Commiaim�r Alion Gu� A/NAirNatiaal GumaL• Mqjae' Marii lt. Nea NoHhwut Airliioer: �� l�ra e.yr. St. Paut Clnmber of Cmaeacs: ��a� sun counlry,uALee.: Loke A. C.ams UrdtedAislinu/ne.: ' ADau 1bmNnma uror�ra,�ts��.: ste.e wadcar• Pa� � US. Air Force Raxm: Capfdn 8te►es ChaQ�n us. supplemenrd ca,rien: x�e �.n�c � Metropolif�n Airports Commission DeC�I'8f10II Of Ptti'pOSlS 1.) Promote public welfare and national security; serve public interest; convenience, and necessity; Promote air navigadon and transportation, international, n��ioaal; state� and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, safe, and e�ono�ical handling of air commerce; assure the inclusion of this state in nadonal and international programs of air transportation: and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the metropolitan area in this state as an aviation center. and to correlate that area with all aviati� facilities in the entire state so as to provide for the most economical and effective use of aeronautic facilities and services in that area; 2.) Assure the residehts of the metrc�golitan area of the minimum environmental impact from air navigation and transportation, and to that end pmvide for noise abatement, conirol of sirpoit area land use, and other prot�tive measures; and 3.) Pto�note the averall gosls of the state's environmental policies and minimi�p � public's expc�sure to noise and safety hazards azound airports. Metmpolitan Aircrat� Sound. Abatement Council Statement Of Purpose This corporation was frnmed in fi�rtherance a� the general welfare of the communiries adjoining Minneapolis-St. Paul International AirPort - Wo1d-Cliamberlain Field, a public airpart in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, through the alleviati� of the problems Greated by the so�nd of aircraft using the airport; through study and evaluation on a continuing basis of the pmblem and of suggesti� for the alleviati� af tl�e same; through iniaa6on, coordinaaon and proanotia� o�f reasonable and effecave pra�dures. cuntrol and regulations, consistent with the safe operation of the sirport and of aincraft using the same; and through dissemination of information to the affected cammunides, their affected residents. and the users af the airport respecting the prQblem of six�raft naise musance and in respact to suggestions made and acflons initiabed and talaen to alleviate �e problem, Metropolitan Aircrati Sound Abatement Council Repe�esentation The membership sball include representatives appointed by ag�ncies, corporadons, associatians and governmental bodies which by reason of their statutory suthority and mspo�sibility � control wer the air�ort, ar by reasa� of their staius as sirport users, hsve a direct intenest in the operatia�n � the airpart. Such members will be called User R�eseutatives and Public Representatives, pravided that the User Representarives and Public Representatives sball at all 6mes be equal in numbe�: !, The Airport 24hour Noise Hotline is 726-9411. Complaints to the hotline do not resuCt in changes in Airport activity, but provides a public sounding board and airport informatioa outlek The hotline is staffed 24-hours Monday - Friday This reFat is Prepared and printed in house by Traci Erickson, ANOMS Specialist Questions or comments may be ditected to: MAC - Aviaflon Naise � Satellite Program M'uineapolia /Sk Paul Inteinational Airport . 6040 28th Avenue South M'inneapolis, M[�T 55450 Tei: (612) �25=6331; Fax: (612)'725-6310 Metropolitan Airports Commission Av�iation Noise Frograms � , �� - Operations and Conaplai�t Sumr�aar� 1 _ . Operati.ons Su.rnmary - All Aircraft .....................:..................................................... . . ..........1�. . MSP November Fleet Mix Percentage .....................:..........................................................1 i Airport November Complaint Summary .............................................................................1 �l'ovember Operations Summary - Airport Directors Office ...............................................1 ''� '� �� ' � ;� i • i� � i i . � Cornplaint Summary by City .. ......................................... ..................2 ................................. . � , �, � �� AllHours ..............................................................................................................................3 NighttimeHours ...................................... .............................. .3 •,• ......................................... . / � ,,� r � �; Runway Use Report November 1995 ...................................................::.............................4 Cartzer Je� Operatao�s 5 Runway Use Report November 1995 ........:..........................:.............................. ..........5 , , . / r � i � � . Runway Use Report November 1995 ...................: ...........1....:.............................6 , r ............... � . � . � i ' , , � , � � � Runway Use Report Navember 1995 ...............................:..............................................:...7 Carr�zer� J�t Operations by Type 8 � � �, , � � �, , , ,, . � , �� ' / t . ;' . �:� . ,' � , , � � Daytime Hours ........................................................ � ...........................................................10 Community Overflaght Analysis Il Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours .....................................................................................11 Carrier Jet Operations - Nightti.me (l lpm - 6 am) ...........................................:.................11 Aviation Nanse Programs � � / � ` � i / � � ,� � � t Car�ier Jet A.rrival �I�elated Noise Events 13 � Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ..:........:.........................................13 � i i , ,i � � � � i � � � / � � � Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ..................................... /` ' � �' ' � � , . � � �i ' � �' . . � � , , . � � � i ' � �' `` � � � � � � �i ' � �, . � � , , �� ,i , T'en Loudest.Eiircraft 1l�oise L vents Ide�tijiecl 19 ' / � i � � � , , , � � � � / � � � � � � �. � �� , - , , �,- , , , , , , , , .....14 C� 22 Carri.er Jet tJperations - November 1995 ..........................................:................:...............22 � A�rport Noise a�d Operations lilonitoring ;System Flight Tracks 23 Carrier 7et Operations - November 1995 ...........:........................:.......................�..:...........23 Airport l�oise and C�peraiaons Monatoring Syste�n Flaght Tracks 24 Camer 7et Operations - November 1995 ..........................:............................................... 24 Airpo�t Noise and Operations Monitoring System Flight Tracks 25 Carrier Jet C}perations - November 1995 ...........................:.............................................. 25 Ai�port Noise a�d Operatzons Monitoring System Flight Tracks 26 Carrier Jet Operations - November 1995 ...:.............:........................................................ 26 Analysis �►f Aircracft 1i�oise Events - Aarcraft Ld,� dB(A) Analysis of Aircraft Noise Events - Aircrafi Ldn d�(A) ' Aviation Na�se Ptograms �I : Q � '�� :� • i� ��n r.� ,' � � . � ' , � � 1� . � �, 1 ' 1 1 Operations Summary - All Aircraft MSP November Fleet Nli�c Percentage �- Airport November Complaint Summary � � November Operations Suan�ary - Airport Directo�s Office • . Aviatiaa Noise & Sabellite Programs Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission �lllii��.j�Ol1S - ��. Page 2 Paul International Airpoa-t Complaint Summary Novennber 1995 Cornplaint Summary by City ;;:;:;;;::>:»:;.:;;:>`::::::::>:::::>:> ::::::::::::::::>:::::::::>::::>:: :::€::<::::::::::>::>::>::::> �::;::>:::>�:::::>:::>::::: ::::::>«:::::::::<::: �::>::::>::>:<::::;>::::>:<::;<:: :<:::::::>::>�::»::>::::>:::::::;::::::::>:::::<::::::: ::>::>:::::::>�:::: �::>,:::::>::>::»»>::»>::»:: :<:;::>::::>:::;::»::::>::>::::>:::: ........ :. . ::::::�;"�� : ::::::;�7r�€; : ... ��::<>�::_:;.: ::: ,.::.�:.:: �;.;; :. :: '�:�`;":::::<: �:: :.:<;:.::.::.:::.:;::,::>::.:::>:... . ::..::.:� :::...::::::.�.::::. . ....: ::. ... , . ..:.:�::::. . �:::.:�:;:.�.:: ;.::::::::::. :::.: ::: . . :::,:>: ::.� ::.::.:::::..�:.�::::::. �::''�;�??:::::":':�:�i��::��:_`;`::::��:::::�� ::::: ::: � :::::::>:: �'(]k .......... �+ :::::::.�: ::. t� *� .:�:..�.�:: .:; • :.;::. ::: :::: :..:..:.: :.:. y�p .� :::::.:::::::c.»;�;::;:::............ :. :.:::.........:.. ............: •• '• .. � ...�.R.... . . .::•::;;:.:.;•::::�.::�;:�:�::?:::<:::>:z�';a:s::;:�:;.:j •::::�F.�<'•�'�� ............. •:;:i::.x.:.�:::�.,4��,.,�............ <�::.....�it.�.�...'�+4+..�. ::: .� :::::::::::::....:t:x�:>:»>:+.•::x�t:::4:::::�:.�: :::::: .:::::::::.�::::: a»:ottt::>:::::?•::o::::::.�:::.�::: :::: ..... .•.. � ::::.>:iJ'!':.;:. Apple �7alley 3 10 13 1.1% . _.... Bloomington 0 24 24 2.0% Burnsville 0 27 27 2.2% Champlin 1 0 1 0.1% �Circle Pines 0 1 1 0.1% Downing 2 0 2 0.2% �S� 31 ' 770 807 66.0% Edina 2 4 6 0.5% Inver Grove Heights 4 33 40 3.3% . � Lilydale 1 l 2 0.2% 1Vla.plewood 0 1 1 0.1% Mendota Herghts 3 12 18 1.5% Minneapolis 40 188 234 19.1% Moundsview 1 1 2 0.2% Oakdale 0 1 1 0.1% Plymouth 3 7 10 0.8% Richfield 0 13 15 1.2% Roseville . � 1 2 3 � 0.2% _ St. Lou'ts Park 1 0 1 0.1% St. Paul 4 4, 10 0.8% South St. Paul 0 3 3 0.2% ::::::::::.�:::.; .::::::::::::.: �:::::.:.: ........ :..:�::: .::: .:.�:::::.::�:.:::::::::. . ::.: :::::::::::::.:::.;,;.:::::::....,..: .::::.� :r.>::.:�:,:.::.::.::.:...::.:�:<: ...... .,...�.. .:...._::;......... .;..�:.::::::::.::.�:::::;::::::::::: ............:................:...... ...........:......:..........:.::.. ::....� :::::....:::::.:.::::::. . ;.:. .::.....,.::......,�:4�.:::�.;..:.�:�.>::::::::� .................: .::.::::.::..::::::::.�.:::.,:�:.::.:::::.�:::::..................................... ' .titi%Y.': \i:i<�?vt•; ^;; h.p ;x.;::.v:r::.:. . . ..::.�...:::: �::.t•:::::::: . : .n....s..v.. ;v.:::�. v; � . . ...:.•n..rs.} :: w:n�::. ;. .. .. :::�.:::::::..�:.�::�:.:�::::.. • } n • •. t� yr.'o: ... .; . . ., . . . : . . . . . . ��::%., v . ::::::: r::::::::::. �::::::::::. . :::: •,....::•:::: •::.::.:::::. . ....: . .... } ? ,;.;;.r;:::�: •: •;:•:� �•t:xt: :� :�:. :: j . ..::::::::::::::::::. �k::; ... �: •: �::::.::;•. ....... _.. . .. .,........... ............. .:: •� :.: :.::. ; ...y.:::: •:::. ..,>... .. u.t:::r:rr:o-. ' y :::::................... ;:;;.;,.•.:::.::. . :::::.:::::::::. : :• :;:•::::�::•:•t: .:::•:••>:•::�:: ' . :`•>:•::•`.•;r,> ...1..::.�.v.::.:v::iiir.; :. :i:i�niiiY:ii};i;ni i: :h}i'.i":iii: .. .::m. y�..:;• ........... v••• •iiiiii:ti?;: : . •::n�:QSY iiiti}}iiiii�' '• ; . .. ^iiii:i:�: ......... �. �:::: :•::::::::.: �:::::. �:::: �:::•i:::. ........:.. . • ::: ..............:... .......:. :::: :.:: x::........:... ;i::•i:�::•..; . .F�.ii: {'{::� i::� :.i:tir�:�:-':�::��i:•?::•i:•ii:• �-. TiYne of Day Nature of Complaint Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs. � Metrogolitan Airports Commissioai Available Tirne f�a° Itunway LTse Tower Log gteports - Noverr�ber 1995 � � All Hours <�:�:��:;�`.' �a:�';� � � �'.�,�..�'.'..♦��`. `�� 1 :::� � :::�::�?�:"�..��.�.��..:'�;:�:.:;::. Nighttime Hours 22 C�J v �� >:�>,:::::;:::;::;::>� 04 '��`�;;;;'��°r�� ;�„ <«�:::�...::, Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs Page 3 Metropolitan Airports Commission : l�ighttime - t�ll Clperations . . . Use Report Novernber 1995 .::;::::::::1��'�:`�: P� 6 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs . 0 Metropolitan Airpcnts Commissioa l�Tightt�me Carr�er Jet �,lperataons Runway Use �teport Noverriber 1995 .:::::::;:;;>.;��; � Aviatic� Noise & Sabellite Programs Page 7 Metrop�litan Airports Commission � Carr�er Jet Operations by 1�ype November 1995 � Page 8 � ;:::`�`�i�ir��>��''><>.>.«>`.::�:: �:<:;:�:;:::::::'�<:':`�>�`<`..'�`<::::::>:::;'::;:��':;:.:.><`<;.`.<>.><.,.>.<.:..`:::<::;:: :.::.>�:>::><`�'�:�::>::; :>::::::::::>�o�,�r:�:::>::>:::>::: »:��::: B707 0 0.0% B727H 207 0.9% B�33/4/5 797 3.5% B747 152 0.7% B�4F , 12 � 0.0% B757 2009 8.7% B�67 0 0.0% BA46 0 � 0.0% CL65 267 ' 1.2% DA10 4 � 0.0% DC 10 861 3.8% DC87 162 0.7% DC9H � 2274 9.9% EA31 26 0.1% EA32 2103 9.2% FK10 1081 4.7% L1011 10 0.0% MD11 � 4 0.0% NID80 1197 5.2% BA10 4 0.0% BAll 1 0.0% 8727 3343 14.6% B737 1031 4.5% DC8 97 0.4% DC9 7311 31.9% FK28 0 . 0.0% ';::>:: ;::;::::;;:: <;:::: ::: �>: <� �:>:::::;:; :::.: ;:::::: : . .::::::.::::. ..:................................ .:.....,...........:..........:..... :.�::.::�.,::. :.::.� ::::.::..:..:..:............ .::.;.>:::;:::::.::: .;.:.:.:::::.:..;.:. €:::��::<;::;::>>::: :�. :::<:�:. . �'�::>;:;::;;: Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs . �� : .', � i • /i` �1.4% Sttlg6 II � s�m B727 B727H 8733 B?37 B73S � B74� B74F B757 B767 BA10 BAll BA46 Q.GS DA10 DC10 DC8 DC8S DC86 DC87 DC9 EA31. EA32 "` FK10 - FK27` � L1011 l�IDll 1VID80 SW3 SW4 SF34 Metropolitan Airnorts Commissioa .Aircraft Identifiier and escript�onTable BOEING �07 BOEII�TG 727 BOEII�TG 727 - HLTSH KIT BOEIl�tG 737-300 BOEING 7371�l2� SII2IF.S HOEING 737. � BOEING 747 _ �, BOEING 747 FREIGHTER BOEING 757 BOEING 767 BRITISH AEROSPACE 125 BRTTISH AEROSPAC� 111 BRTTISH AEROSPACE 146 CANADAIl2 650 FALCON 10 MCDONNE[,L DOUGLAS DC10 • MCDONNEI.L DOUGLAS DC8 MCDONN.ELL DOUGLAS DC8 STRET(� MC�ONNF��, DOUGLAS DC8 60-SEI2tIFFS MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC8 70-SIItIES RE MC�ONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 � AIRBUS IlVDUSZTtIES A310 AIRBUS Il�IDUSTRI�S A320 FOHI�t 100 FOKi�it F27 (PROP) FOKI�t F28 LOQ�IEID TRISTAR L1011 MCDOrINE[,L DpUGLAS DCll MCDONN,II,L DOUGLAS DC9 80-SERIES SWEARINGEN METROLINIIt 3 � SWF.ARINGEN METROLINER 4 SAAB 340 Aviatia� Noise �& Satellite Programs ! Page 9 Nfetropc�litan Airports Commission . Runway Use - I)�.y/Night Periods - All Operations 1Vlinneapolis - St. Paul International Airport I�ovember 1995 Daytime Iiours Night�ime Hours Page 10 � Aviation Noise 8c Satellite Progcams � �� ,. Metropolitan Airports Commissio�n Community �verfiight Analysis IVlinneapolis - St._Paul International Airport liTovember 1995 Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours . Carrier Jet Operations - Nfghttime (11pm - 6 am) Aviatio� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 11 Metropolitan Airports Commission l�emote Monitoring Site Locations Airport Noise and. Operations 1Vlonitoring Syste�n � Page 12 Aviatiaa Noise & Satellite Programs C r'� � Metropolitan Airports Commissiaai � . . . � . . t; � , , ,; . � . �. �� Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Each RIVIT :::::':��'.3�`:�:£��:��::::::::::::�:':�:�::�:2::;::�:::::::::��s:��:':::':::#:�::`:2:::':,�::::��i�:f��i:i;�::i;'::::::�::fi?�;=::�:::::;:::i:::;:i�<:::;�:r�::`::i:;:::::;i::``�c::::'�:>�:::i:::`::;:'`::`::::��3:�::':.:;;:�':`i;':��'�`:':::k;::'i:::;:::::::::`::� :;i:::::::::::3::;::':i:i:,;; ::::::::::.::: �;;::;::`:::::::::::::::i::i;::�:::;ti::�:�:`:::'::;:`<.'<::':{:::'>?:::'<i:::;::::> :.:.::.:::::.:::.�::::::::.::.;:.: �::::>:.::::.:.:: • :.::<.:.::.:>:.: :s• . ......... . . ..... :•.»:.>:.::.::::: ...... � : . . ... � . } :::::::::. :. . .>:.:. . .: :: . :. .::.:.:� :.::.;.....�.�..''�.�I..�k.:.�. ::::..�..;�.'�.�.��..:.;;: :.>:.;..�.�.�:�i�. .�;;:.:.::.;�r:. .. i3 :::. :.;:.:<;.>:.:•:>:.:.:.::::>:;::»;::> :s::>::;::»::>•;;:.::.:�: .;:: : :::::::;:<:»:;:>::>::>:<::;:.:>.;. .. . . . . �> . . . ....... � .... .........��...�3:... :::.;;»:.::.:.�� ::.::.� .:::: :.:::::.�..:.:,<: . • ..�- .. • . : • . . .:> •:: :>:::::>::::::::>:::::<:.:;::.:>•:::.:.::.:::�:::s:::::::;::;::::::.:»:::::::;:::>::>::: ::::::>::::::>.>:.;•.��::<::.;::.;;:.:<.::.;:.::;<.>:�:;:.;:.::.;:.>:::•< ;:::::::>::::: :: : : :::::::::::>::: :::>::>::::::::::: :.:.�:::::... ...:..:.:::::::::.�:..::...:... : . ��+..��.�..��. . ..... ......... . . .......... . .. .::: ...... .......................: .::.�..�....:::: .:: ........... .........:��............:...:.::::::::::: .......................... �::::. :.... ... . . . .:::<. .:.::.::.>:.: :: .. �::. ::::::: . . .: ....:;:.::. ;;:::::: ..: .: .:: ......::.: :.::::<.>:.:�::.:>:::.;:.; .:::.;:.»;:�:.:.::.;:.::.:::;.:::.:.:�:.;:.;:.::::;::.;:.::.::.:�:..::.;:i:;.;:.::.:;:,.:.>:.>:.;:.>:.;:::.;:.:.:.:.:::>:.>:.;:.:::::::.>:.;:::.>:.::.:>::.>;::.»::.»:.:;:.:.;;::.»:;:.>:::::<.. ��. . . . .;::.:: :>;:: �. > :�.>..� .,�.. � :::: . � . � :::::: :.: � :.... � :::.::.::.>:.::.; ::.: :.::.: ::::::::: : ::::::::::::::: :: :: ::::::::::: ;:.::.;::�<:::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::: . ..�:. ::::.... . .: . . ::;;: ::.::;:::;::.:.:::.:;<:.::.::.:::::;> .....:.:..:........................................:...............................................:....................................��:.::.;.;;>:: . � :>::>:::>.::>� �:,: <::;:>::::::>:.�»:: . ��..... .....��..... ... .. . ,;:;: ...,..... . ............:::::::::::::::.�::::::::::: ::...::::.: :..:.: :........ :.::: ::::.:.::................. .. . ..... ...� ::.:::::.;:.::.>:.::.� :::::::::: .:::.�:::::.>::.>:.;:.:::;::.�::::::.:........::::::::. :..�:::.>;:.:.;:.::�:.>:.:.:<.::.:.::;.:.:.�:::::::::::............................. �.�R.��... 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st Street ....816 ......... ..........23:.:.:.:::: .::::.�:::::.0::::::::::: .::::::.;; :.:;�;.::.;:.;;;;>: 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 739 70 1 0 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Helma�t Avenue 849 359 8 p 4 Nfinneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 857 216 0 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 1285 951 189 0 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue 8c 57th St�eet 11'78 880 190 0 :;::'::<>:<::::::>�::::::>:::»:::>::<: ::::;<:::<:<:::>::::>:::>::::�:>:::;:;>::»::;.::::::;:< ::::::::::::::>:<: >:::::<:::;:::>::>::;::::::>;::<::::>::>:::>�::::;::<:>::>:::»:�:::�:>:;:.:.::.;:�;:;.:.::.;:.;:.;:.::;::.::.>:.::.:.: ;;:.;:.;:::::::::::::::.:�:::. :::::::.�::.�.�::.::::�:.: ........................... ..... ::::;>::>::::;:::::':7::> ::::::::::::::>::: :::::>:::<:::::>:::;:<: . .: .. :.. :. ;;»>::::>::».:::>::::>:::;::::::::>,::::., :::::.:::::::.:. .:::.; :::::.:;: ::::�;:.:.;.:<. .:.;::;.::.;�.;<:::>::::::>::::::::::::::::>:<:>::>:::�:.:::�::::>:::>::;;> ::::::>:::::::«;;:;.:.::>:::�>::;:>::::: �:::::::::::>::::;::��'��::::>::>:::<:::>:::::<:>:;>:::::'::::>':::.;:<;.:::::.<.:::,: :: :.:.:� ::::::.......:::::. :::::::::::::: ��c�::::::::::::::: : ::.::::::::..... . . .. . :. . . :.:�:::::::: :::::::::::: �.........:.. .:�::::: � ..:.: :::.:....... .:::::.�.�::. ...... .............::::.�:::::::. .�::.........:.....:.: :.::.::�::::.�:::::::.:.... ........... ��:�'�t.��.��:��.�::........ .............:::::::::::::. ::: ::::................... ..::.:::::: �.: :......... ........... :�:::::::::::: . . . .........:. .......................................... :.::::.�:: :::.:.�..::::::::::.:�::::::.:_>:.;;: :.:;:.::.;:.::.;::.:.>:.>;:.::.::.::.:: :.>:.::.:::::::»::::::::.::>:::::>;:.:> »::>:>::::>:.:::;:::::>::»:::::<. 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Strcet 17 1 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 22 8 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 50 22 3 p 11 St. Paul F'um Street & Scheffer Aveuue 15 1 �' 0 0 s:�::��:;'>:':��><:�:�::>:�:<': ��:�:':;'>�:;`:>;:::€:'::�>�...:..'.::::'.:.<.��}��'��':�:;>��:>�<:'::>:�::>:�:>:::::;:;::::>.�`:::>:;.�::::;...;:::::>::::::::::<:;.:;::::::::>:<.::>:::��::::;::::>::::>::>;::.:<�'�::;:::::<>::::>:::::>::::>:::;`:::::::::>:>:�::>�:::;:;:;.:::::>��:::::�:::::<<>::::::»<:>:;`;;,>::>;:»:>:'::::::::<>:::>::>::>::,`;';:::>::::;::><:;:::::::>:::::€<::::::::� ::::::::::::::::>:::>:: >::::: :.��.�:..� :.:::::::::::.�: . . � .... ::�::::: <::> :::::.: ::::::::::;.;:.:::.: :.:�::::: . . :: . .... ............... ...........�:.:......:�: .:.�:.�:::::. ::::.:::::.:::.:�:.::.:.::;:;: :::::::::::: ........................:..::::::..:......:..::.::�:::::::.:�::.:::::::..:...:.::::�x:...�```....,t�........€.:�:��.�, . ......................::::::.:::.. ........................:: .:.�........�......................:::�:::......... .::::::::.................. .....:.:.:::::.�::.........................::..:..:::: �--.......................:::::.�:::::..:....................��::::........................:...::: .:: :....................... ....�.:�::::::::........... ..................:::::::. ................... ..................::::::.: �::::::::::. � ::::::::::. .::::;:.»:.>:.;:<.:;:.;:.;:;::.;:.::.;:.::;.;:.;>;:.::.::: <::.::::::»<::»>:::>:«:::;:::::»»::: �::>::;::::>::>::: :»:<;:>::>:::<:::::>::::>::::;::»>::::: ::;::>�::::>:::::::.:::::::>::::::>:::<:::>: ::::>:::;:::>::::::::::::><::>::>::::>':>.::: ::::::;::::;::>::::>:::::::::�:;>:::;�:::';: � 13 Mendota Heights Sout6east end af Mohican Caurt 18 0 0 0 14 Eagan First Strcet & McI�ee Street 4412 367 1 0 15 Mendota Heights C�llea Street & Lexingto� Avenue 72 5 0 0 16 Eagan Avala� Avenue & V'�las Lane 2872 1436 9 0 17 Bloomington 84th Strcet 8c 4th Avenue .31 8 0 0 18 Richfield 75th Street 8c 17th Avenue 34 7 0 0 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 2 0 0 0 ZU Richfield 75th Street 8c 3rd Avenue 2 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Harbara Avenue & 67th Street 48 0 0 0 22 Inver Ga�ave Heights Anne Marie Trail . 1975 15 1 0 23 Mendota Aei�hts End of Kendon Avemie 1001 23 0 0 �' �S� C�apel Lane & Wren Lane 3139 144 8 0 * Site 7& Site 12 az�e experiencing equipment problems. Aviation Noise & Satellite Pzogram�s Page 13 Metropo(itan Airports Commission , . . �., .•:. ., , . . . , Count of Departure Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT � ::::1;;t:�:;>:<:>;��:'��' i::��'�.�:»�':�:<�r:'::::':�>�:>`.:f;<::::;;:':��<:�:�:��;:::`#��"�:::>`��:�>:>z:;;�i::':'::�::::;`:�::::::>::::::>;">'':::��'::�<:':�:'::::'::>::::<:::;`:.>:::::>:�>}�::>:::<:�:`:>:<:;>��>;?:;:::�:�:'':;;:;;;;;`:`•'::s:'::>:<:::::::�:.>'::::>::: `:��'��``<'.::>:;:::��:'::::::::>::<: s:'�:+s><:>::::%:;''::�:'•�:::::::�:::::>>�>:::�::>::;:::>�<:::::::;::::::>::::;; ........ �.>:. >:<.::.:::.::.::.:.::.:.i.::.:::+:�:.::::. :. . .::::. ::::.: : . . :::.::.>:.�. . ......: ....;:.>: � � �::: •:::::._:o-::::::>:::; :::: :.: .::::::.:.:::.�: •:. .:.. . :..:.�:::...:....:: :: :.:: : . : :. ....� ......:.. :::':::::::i::::ri.:. .::::.�:::: ::::: .� ..�. ::::. . . :::: :.::: . . . . :... ...:. .. .......... ..... . ;. . . . .: :.. . � • ;:::: ::::::::::: :.��....�..�,......�.�..:;•:;. .::::..��..'�+��r.�..��.:;:: :::;:..�.�.i�:. R ::;;:.::::�r.. .. . . :::. <:>:<:>r:::>�.......;:<.:>;;:<.::.::;.:::::::�:::>:::�>;.••;• ...::.;:.:;:.:::.>;>;::::.>:;::.:. . ..�....�'»� .............'� I3 .... ......... .: :::::::::..:�:::..............�r��.�� :::::::::............... . ;: • : ; . . , .,. .. ...... ......... , �:::�3:.... ......... ............................................:................�.. .... .. . . . � .;;>::::>:::::;::::::::.:.:;;;:;:.::.:;»:;:;;::::,.::;.::<.::;;::.::.<:::.::;<�;::.::.::;>:;;::.:;:.::.::�::.�:::::::::............. .� :::::::. . . ::::::::.. .... :.:::::::::::::::::::.��'°........:::....�::.� ::::::::: :. .......�?fl��:..�".�..��.�?��I�.:::: .�::::.:: . .. ::.::. :::::::: .. :.::: .: :.::::: .:...::.........� ::::::::::::::.:.:... :.:.� .::::::::: . . .......::. ::::::::::::::::::.�:: ::......:.::::::::::::::::: ::::.... ��.::::::.::::::.�::.:::::.:.........::..::::::::::::::::::::::.... .... ... . : . ::::. .::. ... . : :.::: ..�::.�:. . .::: :.::::::: : . :. ......:� .::...:...�:::::::.� :. ::::::::: :..:...........:::::::::::::::::::::::.. ...::.::::::::::::::::::::.:�:::::.... ....: ::::.:�::::::::::::::.::�::.�:.....:.�:..::::. . . ...:. ... :. .. . . ::::: .: :.. . . . . :: :.: :::.:.. . .: . . ::. . . . . : : :.: ,:.: . : � : , : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . : : : : : : : : : : . .: : : : : . . .::. :.:::.,�.� � :>:.;:: ::::>:.. . . �;:::::»:::::::>::::»::»::::::<::::: :<:»:::;>:::::::>;:>::::>:<:>::::;::::::<:>:>:::::;:::::::::>:::::<::::: :::::<;:»>::;»>:::::<:::�::::;:::::>::;;:.::;>::;;:.::::<:::.�::: :.:::.�:::::::>:.:>:,:::�;:.::.:: � .............. ........... .....................:. .......................... . :.:: ..................................... :. ................................... ..... ......................::::: .: ...��::::>::: :<:::>:�:>� : � >::.::; :::>:. ��: : ............. :.::::::..... .......................:::::::................... ..... :.::::::: :.:...........................::::. ::::::.:. ....................:::::: : :......................... . :.::::::::............... ....... �.�.:::.: :::�:��. . : . ;;:.: ..... .............................:::::::::::::.�::... .............:..:.�:.:::::::::::.�:....................:.::.:::.�::::::::::........... .�:::::.�::: ::.:::::::... ..........::::::::::.�:::: ................::::::: :.:: :::::....... ��:.:. ...... 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue & 41st 5treet ........... ..........466::::::.�: :.::::::::159::;:.;:.::.:. .;>:.:.::.::.>:.;>i ::.>::;;.:.>::::::::::::::::>::>:<:;:::>::::::::;::>: 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 587 193 2 p 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belmont Avenue 914 162 10 0 4 M'inneagolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 11:13 339 26 2 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 3084 1628 539 86 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Sireet 4236 2531 1280 352 <;;>;:;>:.>:.::.:: :::.;;:.:.: �.;;:: .:::.:;:<;.:.;:;.:::.>:;:.::.:;::<.:.::,:;::.;:;.:::.»: ;:.;:::. ;:»;:.;>:.:: � : :.:::;::.;:.>:.::::;:.;:;:.:;:<::.:;;;: >:.::.>:,::.::::,;: :: .:::: :: : :.::. � :::::::::. .. � ::::::::: ............... .... .. . . ... :i;::::>�:1:::::::: �:::::;:z::s::::::: ::;:;;:::><.>:.;:.::....,;.>. .:...:::.;•��.::.:�; :.:::::::::.::: :.::::::: :.....::::................ .............. .. ............ ........ ................ ..... ............... ......... i:::::i:::::::iiii:i:�i:i::i:i:i::::i; i:::::::::;?:::::?:i:i;'. . . . . .:::>.i:s:::r:a::.:;:::::r:.:::.: .. ....:.::::::::: .::.., :::::..,, ,.,: r "'::::i '�^.:::.::.:•.:::::kk:::::::i:i::i??:::ii::::#:i::i::::.:i:'•t::'i:::::::: ::::::i:s:::ii::?5:;:::::::::::::::::;i ::?::::S::i;:::i:i:::iRi;:i:i:::2:#i::::i:::::::;::::i::::::ii:::;;::::i::::ii:� ....... ��.a✓��::::::::: ;::::::t::. :k:;::t::::::5:::: . .� ::::::::::::.::;;;:::::::.:.�::::.................. ...................... . . . .:.. . .. ::. ::.::,::::::..::::;:::::;:�:.:>�::.�:::.:.�::.:::::.: ::>:_:.:::::.:::::::::::: >;:.;:.;:.;;�::..::..�::.:�.� .:::::::.>::•.: :::::::::.:...........::::. :::.�:.�:::..............�::::::::::::::::::..... ........�:: ��:�..�.�.:. :... . .::::::::::: .:................ :.:.�.�:: .:::::......�....:::::::. :::::.�::... ........:::. ::.:: :.::::.� ...........: ........::.::::::......... ..........::::::.�::.......................:::::...........................::::::::.................�::�............ :.:::::.�.�................ .....::::::::............. ........::: �:........... .............�:::::....... ................................... �::::::.:�::::. �::::::: :.:::::.�:;:.>:::;<.;:.;:<.;;:,:.: .::;::<,.::;;»::>::;:<:::>::>::::: ::::::;:::::>::::>:::::::::;::::>::::::::::: :::::::>:::<::::>:::::>::>:<::::::::<�::::::: >:<::<:::>:::::<:::>::>::<::::::>>>:::<: $ Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Streat 1377 378 15 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Stx�eet & Har�ford Avenue 12 2 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdain 5treet 149 1 0 0 11 St. Paul Fiffi Strcet & Scheffer Avenue 31 11 � 0 0 :<:;:�>:::��`��<:::;':::::;;:: :s;:;:::;:::� :::::::::::::>;..:.::::;;s::�"::>::>�<;;::�:::::::>'::::>:::::::'i ::::::: ��<`::';��>:::::::<:::: ��>:::::::>::>:>::.,::::;>.:�'��::::::>:��:::;:>:::::::::::��::>�::::::::<:::::>::>:::::>::::::: ::::>::;'::>>:::::;:>::::::�:::::::>::>::: ;>;::::>:::>.>:>::::>:::::::>;:;::><.: ;:>::>::>:::<:>::>:>:::>.:::>:::»�;:: >:;:::>::>:::>:::::::::<>::::;<:::;: ��«.� . ,�i�f.: . ; .:. . . . ..:. :.�:.;:.::.;:.::.;::.:;:.>:.?r�.>:.::;:.:<:::.: .;::.::.:;:<.;:.: :>:.;::.::::.;:.: :.;:.;:.;:.;;:�::. :;.:.;:.::.::::..:.;::::.;:.:;.:::� •.:::.;:.;:.;;:.:: .��`...�.. .�.. .� �:��`�. . :.:::::. ............:.:..........:: .: .......... �.......::::. ............ .........::. .:::: .: ..... ..........:. ::.::.:;:.:.::.:.::.:;::::.:�::.�: .::.>:.;:.;:.;:.;:.:.::�:.�:::::.:�:.::.;:.;:;:.;:.>:.::::.:� :: :..:::.::.::.::::::::.�:.. .��.. ............... .............. ............ �.... . ...... ...... ........... ................::.:�:::...................:.�::: :......................�:::::.:::.:::::.: ::: :.::::::::.�:.�::....................:::::..:.............:::::: ::.::: :..............:::.� ::.:::. :.................::::::::..:::::......�......:::::: ......................... :::.:::.�:.�:::::::.�:::::::::::::.:.::.;;:.:.;:.::.;:.:>:.>;;:;:.;;:; .;::�z<:::>::s::»::>:::;::::»:::»: :::s;:>::>:::;::::::::::::::::::::>s:z:::>: >:::><::::::::::;:::::>;:>::>:>::::::s::::: s:::f:::<;::<:::#::>::>::::::?<:>:::::?�::: � 13 Mendota Heights Southeast end of Ma�ican Court 1003 , 232. 10 0 14 Fagan First Street & McKee Street 1502 454 � 20 1 15 Mendota Heights Cullen Sireet & Lexingta� Avenue 104 23 3 0 16 Eagan Avalon Avenue Fc V'�las Lane 1141 457 58 3 17 Bloomington 84th Street 8c 4th Avenue 80 16 1 p 18 Richfield 75th Stc�eet & 17th Avenue 333 170 66 g 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 205 92 19 1 20 Richfield '75th Street & 3rd Avenue 167 27 4 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 249 79 1 p 22 Inver Grove Height�s Anne Marie Trail . 512 117 4 0 23 Mendota Heights Enci of Kendon Avemie 1068 516 211 28 �' �S� Ghapel Lane &. Wren Lmne 979 226 5 p * Site 7& Site 12 are experieucing equiPment problems. C Page 14 Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs �� ( ) Metropolitan Airports Commission 'I'en Loudes� A.ircraft IiToise Events Identified. RMT #l: Xerxes Ave. & 41st S� Minneapolis RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Belmont Ave. Minneapolis RMT #2: Fremont A�e. & 43rd St. Minneapolis RMT #4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St. Minneapolis Aviati� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 15 Metropoi itan Airports Commission ' 1 1 • . � � . . � , . � RMT #5: 12th Ave. & 58th S� RMT #6: 25th Ave. & 57th St. � Minneapolis Minneapolis RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th S� RMT #8: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. Richfield Miaineapolis Page 16 Aviatio�n Noise Fi Satellite Programs C C � � Metropolitan Airnorts Commission B'en I.oude�t A.�rcraft Noise Event� Iclent�fied R1�iT #9: Saratoga S� & Hartford Ave. St. Paul RMT #11: Finn S� & Scheffer Ave. St. Paul RMT #10: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. S� Paul RMT #12: Alton St. � Rockwood Ave. S� Paul Aviatian Noise & Satellife Programs Page 17 Metropolitan Airports Commission � � � � ` � �' � ' �' 'I RMT #13: Southeast End of Mohican Court Mendota I�eights RMT #14: lst S� & McKee S� Eagan C RMT #15: Cullon St. & Leadngton Ave. Mendota Heights RMT #16: Avalon A�e. & Vilas Lane. Eagan Page 18 Aviatiaai Noise �. 5atellibe Programs 1 Metropolitan Airports Commissia� Ten Loudest A.ircraft I�Toise Events Identified. R1i�IT #17: 84th St. & 4th Ave. �loomington RMT #19: 16th Ave. & �4th St. Bloomington RMT #18: 75th St. & 17th Ave. Richfietd RMT #Z0: 75th S� & 3rd A�e. Richfield Aviatia�n Noise & Satellibe Programs Page 19 Metropolitan Airports Commission Ten Loud:est Aircraft Noise �vents Id.entified RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th St. Inver Grove Heights RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave. 1Vlendota Heights RM�' #22: Anne Marie Trail Inver Grove Heights RMT #24: Chapel I.n. & Wren Ln. � Page 20 ' Aviatiaa Noise & Satellite Programs ' Metropolitan Airports Commissia� Flight �'�°ack �ase Map ` Airport 1�1oi�e and Operations 1Vlonitoring Syster� , � m ' � � Aviatia� Noise & Satellite Programs ' Page 21 ;;:. _ :c\ �.-...-., '�:_•„_,, . �•. ��, „� �\�:_"/ w �� , . ��., ,� ,�\\ ►.►�� a _�.��\ �, w �r_�.\\► 1c. ` ... ��. �� r' ' r `�► ��`�'�\ �`i � �� . r � ,,;�,\��.�1� � �� t�� :.`r - ��►�\\�:\��. � �.�ti:;,�1,ri�� r ; , ;�\\��,,�� :�. � - , ;; • , t • \� • ��` `\`r`�, =_ _�. . � r� i�� •� \ � � � ,^� �� - aC -, '" �iV �.. � �i J �. i/� /� : � �, i � •�, ��/' : r - L;:' ��_��V11{�%j/�M��/ ii - -� �i � �� i �'u/I : ' V� . - .I/ .' ,� '-•` `l .�►�// 1��1 � 67 "' ` . \ �i/ ��,1 �� `'��'I ��r��. ��' +\� . �,�1 ♦ ►"'%�: ��/►—��`"-. :�...—_.ai� ��:, �o"ri: �"'/'.t�� , � �i ., �/"-�/rM:��•_=ra�q1►� '., � � . �v .� �a�� . . ,, ',� �+ v� -. , ►� ' � • ' ..r : • . !�li��-A ..�. . ��:ro.' '�": �'' I .\� � �� `\��'` " �� `��` � '��\��' �� \ �� ` \\��> �� , 1 ,�`�'\j� ��\`� ��r, //° ' \ . �\\�� ► .� : ♦ ,1 I,�� \ • \`'�:\: � ; , �I . � �\` �.,"` \ �;`. `�' `` � � ��f:,_�►� ',� � � ♦ ,''' ��`�1.� � �� `; • % I"- ., l �' �� . �%� ,� �. . �, �t: iI.1 -�� ••:" i, -.+� .► �, � �... ��i � /1,� �' �'��`'',��i�" �� . , ��.a� •�� % � . �'. 1.� . •,•.' ': �. = • '.. `, <,, � , , •:� , . � . ��., ,, � . � ,;. �. '��` . . _.'• .. . . . �' ��\ -� � �: �\�� \\'�� \� ��;: :� ��►, �� . �.�.- �_ � � ��,, ��, - r ► � n � ////,/, , . : i ♦ �� • � - H�� _' . �� / �pnt � . �• � �n�• � � �i rr � .�% ��/, ir -i . ' �� IV 1 � : � .r��l�j� - :� u ��: i�` ,�t�'�'�9'Ii � � ..` ��' �i + /Ii� `"'T�.\?y � ��I., , � � n.`II �M. i. �� !/�� )� 1 �� `�� .�/Ar ♦h. . ..-..iln_:a! !;►��C.�w\ �: ,�-:,, � n'A�;.+A�l�/ I�,i'J � .�`1 J.:% �\�► i. � • .i11�Il��i i Vww� . '__- _: u._,-.:a1`��.\� �4 , � ►•'. ,..,. .. - - � � �r �.,. �,:.�� ,`" ' � . _. � ��... _' �•li t �,- \\\,-� � � � /� � � , , � 1;i � � � � � ,. ,i, , �: '.. .� � �.-it.��.. `� /'� =► ; � t , , — `\�\,�� /!,�i,/''•�,-' y � � ,`` `•��\`�, '��•�i �.� ' ,..._—+c . ' � `� � \►; i�-- _, ': � ►�. � ."'.i i ,,� . .�.qli'�)� . �p � ��.�73, •:` , � � � u � ,� ;r ! �' .� : �' � �✓�i��' � ri' � ��. '. y'! �///"� . �~� � � ., � � t ; ��/� , 1� . �\\� „pt►�� Yd1`� ��/ � �ryo1.'�~'►r...i�.� ��/��'%��I , • S . ,� '�/�i`; u _ . . ��\t�.�rr � •. � � - �" 111� (bi�(�I _ �� _ ` � 1 ) ��+1�� %r�'1 � < . . : �\ d ! � 1 . ,� �. . . =� ,: M � �i f� . � •� � dIR !'r�,..,�, � `� �� 1 ` j / � - �'��I � � � � �i• � ij�"�'►o: ` � .-�"'�'�-F . �'\� � ., �.��t ��-�� \\� � ` \� �. �,-� ` � ^-»��\, �` ��:��16r . ;\\;�\�;```��,,, �.��i � �� ,,, � - \:�'`�� 1�: :' '=`•:��\�\\��`� � . �� \ � � � - � �\�`� ;�\� � � "' \ \ _\ ►,\'.1`\,, I . .;`, ��.� _ � 4 �� '�:; :;�,. \ �� ;�� : � 1 ' . �� \�_ �� r. : - ��r,�� ^�► I��• `�' i,. :! ... � � -: , �� ='�:��., -:,, ►. � � .��,`�';� +, :'�'�; �� -, -�� - ��►♦ ��%:: � ^r►.-�� ' i f �� ,'I��,� ., , ��`e,, ' ,,��_�..,;�. ,� , _ \; `�i.. �s,,, � , �� . ' �� Y ��\ �; . . . �� : 1 ' \` . • . . ,� =�� .,`. \:\ � � `,�� `.�� . . .. .. .,�, ��, :� � , \ ��, w �ti�� r �--..ti ,, � ° ��, � 't', � 1�� } t' '� �'\��.� r �� . ��'� - ��.� .�►.�.� r ' ` \ \``,��_� . ` ��;� ��►� _ _ � i/r; ��''�as ��r�"s�� _ _--. ' i%-- i-i '•. �%'1 \~ — x = . . _.__. ,..i i . .,. ..�... - ' - _ _-- _ � `\,` • , � , . ,��,,c��,�,; . . � a,�, = �: � - ,� . '�- � a . ','��pr �'_�i!' , \�`,�-, �s. ..\ �i��i! �17\a � �� q►i` � �.\\ �a �.!��,*,�1 �`�� `� i/.i��r�i'14► �� \ �� '. \\ \ 1��-_`�i�A��,��. \.v.�._.... . ... _ \_.`�\ ._`ry` • � `�\��". ' , .� . .. ��+. ,. . . .... . � " � ' ��.':►G/% ; �_•�� . �� % .•�-, :��. ��....-�. .. . . . -��.'�• . Metropolitan Airports Commissioa� i Analysis of Aircraft 1V�oise Even�s - Agrcraft Ldn d�(A) I�toveaa�ber Ol to Ielovember 30,1995 � � Noise 1Vlonitor Locations �<<Jf3�,�`�:<:;:� :� F1� :>�:;��:_::::: :: :.;.. : .....:....::.:.. ........:.::..:::. .................. ............... . :..: .;�.�:.< :::.:.::: :::::::::::::.... .................. . ..... ..... . . ..: :::.::.:::::: :::.�::..:..:>::::>:::::<:>:<;;.;�;:>:<.::>:;.;.:::::;:.:;;:::.;, :; ::.. . ...:. ..... .. .. :::. ....... .: . :::. :.:�: .:>;:: »;>;: � <.::.:: :::::: ::<�::. :: ;,<:::>.: ::.. :.:. . .::::: :::.�. ...... .::>.: :...:.:..:..� .:::::::.::::. : .:>;...::. :. : . <.:::..:::.:.;.... ............... :� . �>r�':> ::>:_:::' <, ., :...:...:.>:;. .::::::. . ... ��:>�:::>: ::;:>::#:�::��<::> ::<:: ::. . .�;:;::;: .j.}�� : ::.:. >::::::::::;::: ::.;:>:; :: � ..�6:::::>:� <:::::> : ..... .:::.:: ::>:<::: :.::.<:::>:.;:;r.:;.:,:,;::.>;:.:; :; .:..... :::::. . :::::. :.::.:: ::::.;:.::::. :.:.. .:'.{�:::::. <:,.� ...:. :.::: .::�;>:::.;, . : .<::. :. . . .:.:. .:>::>�: ::.::.::::. :. :::. � . .:,. .::: . :: ::: :::. ::;: :::. ::<:� � ::n. .r.......�......;;. x:i^:;.......r ...:.......... .4.. J'�i'+• ..'� ......iT.f'.•i�::� vi:ii � vii:::::::. : •ii:L:v'i:� � •. i•:: :t:. . :::.::::.�: :::.� :::.:::::.. .. ........r.. ♦... .......y::: .; .... ...:�........�n... .: . .... �..... .�ii ....... ...��. , .. • : :.iii: p}:. . .; ... ...�'.,. �'.��v�.: ............... �}r:::........ :.... v:::: ........... :::::............. ...:...... ...: ... ....��'i<� :::. ...........:n.... ..i::::::.;J:::.v .r .............v.. ::::.�:::?y::::::: ......ti.v....... ................. ......... ... ................. ..............�.. .........::::::: 1 * � * * * * * * . * * * * 2• 55.8 58.8 58.6 62.3 76.2 79.9 * 61.2 50.1 4b.4 45.7 * 3 58.3 60.0 60.i 63.3 75.8 79.8 * 63.8 * 41.7 49.3 * 4 55.6 57.0 58.6 63.2 73S 77.5 * 60.1 43.9 49.6 48.8 * 5 58.7 60.5 652 62.7 69.4 70.3 * 49.6 612 65.0 58.7 * 6 63.2 61.3 60.6 64.7 73.6 78.7 * 59.6 45.5 60.6 50.9 * 7 61.2 60.0 59.7 62.6 � 73.2 79.0 * 62.4 47.8 55.9 51.9 * 8 58.3 59.7 62.8 652 73.5 78.9 * 61.6 42.3 42S 43.6 * � 9 61,7 63.8 68.7 66A 73.2 72.8 * 51.6 50.3 58.4 51.1 * 10 � 61.8 60.6 62.5 66.4 76.4 79.9 '* 67.1 51.1 40,5 46.3 * 11 57.1 57.3 58.2 61.0 76.0 79.7 * 64.3 54.1 59.3 59.6 * 12 57.8 59.1 64.2 60S 68.9 68.2 * 49.7 43.3 49.5 43.5 * 13 � * * * :� * * * * * * * iq. * * * * * * * * * * * * 15 * * * * * * * * *• * * * 16 * � . * * * * * * * * * * 17 * * * * * * * * * * * * 18 * * * * * * * * *. *' * * 19 * * * * * * * .* * * * * 20 * * * * * * * � * * * * Z 1. * * * * 75.1 76S * 62.0 43.3 42.8 42.6 * 22 * * * * 75.9 7'7.3 * 60.9 44.4 52.3 41.0 * 23 * * * * 74.3 73.4 * 56.0 47.1 45.9 46.7 * 24 * * * � 67.9 '72.6 . * 51.3 42.2 50.2 45.7 * 25 * * * * 73.3 74.1 * 59.4 * 42.4 46.1 * 26 * * * * 72.2 78.0 * 58.4 * 45S 45.2 * 27 56.3 55.8 57.2 63.6 72.3 78.5 * 61.2 4b.1 44.3 58.6 * 2$ 57.4 572 61.1 64.0 * 78.4 * 63S 45.� 50.4 46.8 * 29 SS.7 58.3 64.4 62.3 70.3 70.2 * 49.1 56.0 ,60.6 46.6 * 30 57.2 59.5 63.4 63.9 73.7 77.7 * * 47.8 � 57.8 48.7 * Mo. Ldn 60.9 61.2 64.9 65.0 75.3 78.0 * 64.4 56.1 61S 54.8 * '� Less �hon twenty four hours ofdata m�ai/able A�iatiaai Noise & Satellite Pra�rams p� 27 Metropolitan Airparts Commission : Analysis of .�.irca-aft i�oise Events - Aircraft Ldn (A) Nove�niber 01 to Nove�nbea� 30,1995 � Noise 1VYonitor I.ocations `:`:>�;�:��'��:<r:;::< ::..:::;:::.�'::��';:`;:::� ��: �:�:::>..:::_:.::;..:> :.....>:::.::::,,,._..J...;...._>�>:..>:.;:>.:.:;:; :::.;:.»�:.«.: ��'«�:: ��:`�;��'`a<:::,,.:..:.�;.;<��> :.::.:::::::::..:.:'::::::;`'>:`...::.>;::» ::;::��'':'�`:: �<«'::: �>:r<�:::<..::;:'':;<>: >`::::::>::>:::::.��:;:::::: »::�;<`;:<��;_...:::` :::>::>:;.;:::.::;�:;::::::: '��.�r �'�'� �.� ��.� ..�.�.�.,�.�:;,;. .: ��` .. . .�� . ;>:: >;::; . � : �:;;:: :.>;>. : � � :;<.: »::: ... .;:: : �:«: : •:�:.:: .:::��.. :.::::��:::. :. ::•:::•:::.::._::.�:::::::: • :::.:::.::::::::: .::::........:<�:.:..:::•::::.:::::::::.:::.::::::::.: ........::::::::::::::::. ............:::::.. . •::�,�:..: .::: :.::<::::.;•:.�:::.; ...............................:..:....:::::::...:.:::::..........................:.:::.:...�E.....::.: ........... .........................:::::::::..::.�:.:�:::::::.� ::.::::::;:•::•>:.::.:..;:•;:;.::•::.::•::.>:•:. 1 * * * * * * � * * * �x �x 2 43S 66.0 * 69A 48.4 75.'7 63.6 57.9 41.2 62.2 58.6 65.7 3 * 65.0 * 68J 48.2 60.0 52.8 54.8 47.5 61.3 56.8 65.2 4 46.9 62.9 � 67.2 42.2 69.1 65.6 56.7 43.4 58.8 59.0 61.9 5 62.8 66.6 * 69.4 54.1 69.4 61.8 57.2 61.7 61.2 75.0 63S 6 63S 649 * 68.6 52.7 � 68.4 68.0 46.9 58.6 . 59.8 73.2 60.4 7 4'7.1 62.9 * 67.1 , 63.3 67.6 64J 57S 48.6 56.6 56.1 62.0 8 55.6 64.1 * 69.0 51.1 59.7 57.2 52.2 58.3 59.1 66.9 62.4 9 63.3 70.1 * 70.5 52.4 53.4 53.8 58.7 61.3 64.6 732 64.8 10 41.9 64.6 * 69.1 48.1 60.6 37.1 50.4 47.0 60.8 61.9 64.3. 11 4'7.3 61.9 � 67.1 542 62.6 4?.8. 5�.2 49.6 57.0 55.8 61.7 12 60S 65.9 * 67.1 55.2 54.0 52.9 56.8 * 59.4 72.� 64.2 13 * 66.2 51.9 64.6 46.6 60.3 54.9 46.3 * 56.4 571 59.9 14 * * 62.8 70.4 55.3 49.0 68.9 41.7 * 61.3 73.8 66S 15. * * * * * * * * �. * * * 16 * * 60.6 66.2 44.6 72.0 70.4 50.� * 57.1 * 60.4 17 * * 53.1 70.3 54.6 54.6 � 50.8 46.1 * 58.9 * 64,p 18 * * 52.0 68.9 51.2 62.2 58.3 57.2 * 56.� * 60.3 19 * * 66S * 47.1 63.3 68.4 �5.2 * 55.8 * 59.8 20 * * 53.2 * 42.1 68,7 54.2 SSA * 57S * 63.2 21 * 62.1 46.8 * 56.7 61.1 52.6 53.3 * 53.4 * * � 22 63.4 ` 66.3 55.2 * 45S 57.7 53.2 55.3 * 53.9 * * 23 51.1 60.9 * * 55.4� '72.1 68.4 58.9 �* 53.6 * * 24 58:3 63.4 50.9 * 50.9 66.8 _ 52.3 53.8 * 42.4 * * 25 58.1" 66.8 53.4 * 49.4 625 43.9 55.4 * 4(,,g * * 26 56.7 67.6 46.0 * 56.3 66.4 53S 48.8 * 47.3 * * 27 * 66.3 63.1 * 40.7 529 * 44.1 * * * * 28 * 64.9 67.4 * 44.0 57.9 43.3 59.3 * * * * 29 62S 66.4 * 66.9 48.7 49.6 42.4 * * 61.3 73.9 64.1 _30 __ 57.1 ___:65.1- - * 69S 43.8 53S 42.0 55.8 * 59:8 66:4 60.6 Mo. Ldn 61.6 67.3 66.1 70.4 605 68.1 66.0 665 56.9 62.2 : 71.1 66.2 -� �.ess tnan nversty jow hours of data amilable Page 28 Aviatien Noise 8t Satellite Pragrams 1�'\„`` �`��\�,`” �``�\�v�'+Q��.``��—��,\\�\��\��\��; �� . h �� sy��.�s '�� 'wp.� 1� ' "�."'��--"' _ � :�: �� `�.�.\�.\ �. �� . . �� " = a' , , ' � �1►- '�►� �"`�1 "'�' ` ' \ \� � �� "? � + � t � t � t �►'�� ",�,�'"•"� � � • �\ \ \ \ � �\� \� � . . � -.`^-,,,� ��\\\��\�� \�\\�\� �\� \� �{ �: � ! : r ; �' ��'�`'�.\ \��``�.��;,�^� �� \� � �\ � �� l � � s. ! � �"��r � ��\ �� \�� \� ��\\�� G � + �� f>� � I .. �� = �''.�`��\� �'a\\\\��,� � � \` � � , : � � ", \� ` , `! � ��\\,��`\�`\�\ � � � � \ l 1 '�� 1 � 5 � � 1 ,� .., �� \ `., � . � i o + d 0 �►�� 1y . `f��"`�'yi\\��.\\"�` �..C'\\� .��- �� `; + t r , r" � �`, �;`,� �1�;� \` "�\ \,\\.. �� " � . � � d ,{ `,� �� `•: � .{� � ♦ t ' , `�'��►.�� .� ��:;:°�\ �� i s � ��`-i�` w '�\\ �.. �. 4�. r {�. 5 ' . �.� � � �� , .+ ��► � 2 :. r / �;. • � �� ; �. o ,�' ►a.,•�''`��'��.:.,, ,, , , �. \ , .,t�1.-� I ,•1;,,�!��1►; � ' ,, � : , , ' i` �: ' `�' i'�%%.I'� �'^''` %� � : ..' ".: " �\ � ��,�y�,,��'`i► � .�.:.....,,� . ,. �i i ��,e-..�___-... .. .� . � ,: ,; ,. \`�.�� .-I � ~i"• , �j"'`' � �, ��..�..��i�`::�.�� :�. � $ , ; �,,. 3 a '^ ��f-��1 \`` �'� \` ; , r„ � � �� `��,� ��` = �_'�� ,,,';�,�� ►,�: •► f �-.�.��-�.��: ,l �;"_ . ►,,,� ``>. �� `��%'�., � �� !i�j�1j.��•, . '►.. �; ,,, ��'` .1�!r�� `, o` ,��.� "'i�r . \" ��'� t`'�=� ��-�=`iii_:r_��%=``"� �I ; �►- ��!�"..!-,,...__ ;,�j � �i�•► •ip. ` . . � . �I�`�i�' —.�►"��►j'��% � �� .1",�i � � i � ~!///%% i � �\�I��'„'i�,�l••i.��i��!ii� , :, ►��I � � =� � � i✓ i , �; ��ti ` ,�� ..\ 'w�"`-` �./�"�,./�� i�'i.� /•' \ �� . :�►"I_%�—._ :1l / . ►'.i�!-�-="j <..-r . ' `. ��:�� ' ' - .` � �. ►� �� _, ,,� � . . �� i � ' ,, ' ;.,%,��' � : . , :!�r ` - . � : �� ! . � %: ' / '� �', �`� '�: .�f. %i% .. / it .�, ./ / „� ��. :�/ � �� -� �- � � ��i� ` i . � .✓' i /� ' /� / i / .r�Y�� 1 �1�i //-- ... ��.. .. . �� ..i ^�/�i_ �/! i�1,.1��. . . . � . .:\�.�`i .. .. htetropoi itan Airports Commission 1/1 •li / �,� �, � �;� � . r. , � � � � . � � � � �� .11 . . . ., 1 1. • � �' ' ' ' ' � � ' �� . � �� ''� .� �. Page 2 � Aviatioa Noise & Satellite Programs . - , ,, � � ' Metropolitan Airports Commission Minneapolis - �t. Paul Internaiaonal A.irport ' November 1995 �� t r ; . , , , �.� . .,, � . . � , , . . �.� . � •. .. , � � / 1 � 111 '1`'� :� 1, /1 �/ i 1" 1. 31 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE o LEFT COUNT=31 (100,0�). RIGNT COUNT=O (0.0�) � �� -6 DEVIATION FROM CENTER� OF GATE (ft) Aviatioai Noise & Satellite Programs Page 3 �= C „""'� C �„- 1`r w 0 � F-- F— C J C � � n � � -6 Metropolitan Airports Commissioai IVlinneapolis - 5i. Paul Imternational Airport November 1995 3866 ... Total lli, and 11R Carrier Jet I)epartures 484 ... Carrier Jet Departures 12.5 °�) -_ South of Corridor (South of 29i.. I.ocali�ea�) 484 TRRCKS CROSSfD P-GATE. LEFT COUNT=482 (99.6�) RIGHT COUNT=2 (0.4�) _ __ , ; ; ., , •; , • � � ; � . . • .� � ; . �•i . . , , , , a � � � � ; . � , , . ---------- � , � , . � ---r---------------•-,----------------- � , . -------------------�-----------------�----------------- �.�, ;x • . a h,�.,.�� . , ; . .. . , � a .i �t• , e ; ; • � ' ; � y r� �= i e 1 i � •} •�+: e ;o . � . � ~M � � • •• � , � � � • • • � � ' � r w1 � � i ""'_'""' ' ' _ ' : "" � f �"""""""_""'i""'""""_"""J � � O i �""_"_""'_"'' ""'__"'__"'__ � � � �' AAv � i • � �` � � e � �� y• � �' M � � � . �Iss °' °° o � �a • • i • • • O • 4 y0 O � � ' � � _____'_____'__'_T__i____'_____'___l_________________� _'.___.____i'_-_______.____"_� r I ,"""'_ , r"""""'"""' � ; i � � � � i i � � � � i � � ' � i i """"""""1""_""_""""�"""""""""' i""' _"""_""' _'i" _"""""""' _' i' _""' _"' ; '_"" i i i � � � i � i i � ; � : . i . v,,.....� 2000 4Q DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) a Aviakio�n Noise & Satellite Programs Page 5 Metropolitan Airports Commission I� 1V�inneapolis - St. Paul� International Airport lvovernber 1995 3866 ... �'ota111L and 11R Carrier Jet l�epa�tures 1 e.. C�rrier � ' . Metropolitan Airpocts Commissiaai , 5outhern Boundary Coa°ridor Gate Penetration Analysis 1Vlinneapolis - St. I'aul International Airport ' � � Novemlber 1995 � . ��_) • . . 1.,, . • ,, , ., , ;�; � � �; , � � � � . . Aviatio� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 7 Metropolitan Airports Commission . Ii�Iinneapolis - St. Paul International Airport -- November 1995 3866 ... Totai 11L and 11R �arrier Jet I)epartures __ ._ 84 ... Carr. ier Jet Depa�tures 2.2 0) - W=. - 5° South of Corrid.or (5° 5outh of 29L Localizer) 84 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE o LEFT COUNT=82 (97.6%) . RIGHT COUNT=2 (2.4�) � � � �_ � � -6 OEVIATIDN FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Page 8 Aviatia� Noise & Satellite Programs l0 4 � Metrogolitan Airports Commissi� 1Vlinneapolis - St. Paul International Airport November 1995 3866 ... Total 11L and.11R Carr�er Jet .�epartures _. �...- Carrier Jet Departures - E�.rly 11u.rnout 0.0%) �� -4 (South Saeie �efore Three li�Iiles) 1 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE LEFT COUNT=1 (100.0�) � RIGHT COUNT=O (0.0�) ; ; , i i ; . ; � : � i ; ; . ""_""�"'__'_""""'; �"_"""""""""'_"J_""""_""'_"""""'l"""""_"""__""" i i i � . � i � 1 i ' � � ' � � � , � -------'------- � ' ' ----------*----------------"--------�--------------------------'�------------------------- ' ' � i � � i i ; � i � i 00 4nn DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs � ._ Page 9 0 a /I -----" ___...�.�........�iiiiiiiiiiiii/////////////////////////////// �r�-, Minneapolis / St. Paul International Airpori .._..:.. ......... . . .. ,.,. • "� MONTHLY MEETING - Metropolitan Airport Sound' Abatement Council � cha;mm� [tobert P. 7ohneoa Vice Clnirman: s�i B� Teehnical Advirare Jahn Fo�,la Se jD �� nr.a�� .,..: H� goea AirTmmpoM Araocration: Paul McCNaw wre: cuo�d w. co� 1a c�y �e►�,a,�ro�: Petrma Lee Vcrn Wiioo: c;ry �e,,.,�;u�: r� x�.� c�n �r�s�: Tam +LEau . . Gty oj'lmer Grove HeigMr: Dele H�maos CityajMendolaNeighcr: , JW BmiW Ciy ¢Minneapofi,r 7ama B.Bertin 7ahn Rkhter i� � . r�um n� c;�y �e��m: GeorgeSamas n� r�� c;ry �sr. c��. po�x; x�ae,►a�.,. crry �sr. ra,�r: s�oa Eaniu c�c.w�a� Card Mu ntcGmre De/la AirLinealnc: w� � Federo7 Fsprcaa; Tom R6medc Fedeml Aviation Admitdalmtton: s��e w�a x�da c,� MAC Swgi ' DtdcICdns MBM: Rut�at P. Jo6usm Mualn NortkvvJAidtnt: LawrcnoeMcCabe Mehopolitun Ai�parLt Commiaaios Commidmer AIWa Gay�r MNAirNaNanlGar�oi: MqjorMoek7LNao � NmHovut A(rpma: � �a J�ra s.� Sl. Pau( CfnmGer of Camraa�eti: Iadc Haetiq s�co�ti,�;,�: c�ta �. c�� unireatAi.fuwGr.: A�nn 1bmllnaoe Umted Parcel Servica: s�aa w�e. r� � US. Air Forra Rumva: Captatn 9ta►m Chy�mqe us. s��r�,�rd �,.��,,: � �. n� Metropolitan Airports Commission Declaration of Purposes 1.) Promote public welfare and national sacurity; serve public interest, convenience, and necessity; promote air navigation and transportatien, in�"ernational, national, state. and local, in and through this state; promote the efficient, safe, and econamical handling of air cammeme; assure the inclusion of this state in nadonal and international programs of air iransportadon; and to those ends to develop the full potentialities of the meaopoli�an area in chis state as an avia6on center, and to correlate that area with all aviatio� facilides in the entire state so as to provide for the most economical and effecdve use of aesonautic facilities and. services in that area: 2.) Assure th� residents of the metropolitan area of the minimum environmental impact from air navigation and transportatia�, and to that end provide for noise abatement. contral of airport area land use, and other protective measures; and 3.) Praanote the averall goals of the state's environmental policies aud minimi�� publids exposure to naise and safety hazards around airports. Metropolitan Aircrati Sound Abatement Council Statement of P�u�wse This corporation was formed in furtherance of the general welfare of tt�e communities adjoining Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport - Wold-C6amberiain Fieid, a public sirport in the Counry of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, through the alleviatia� of the problems created by the sound of aincraft using the airport; through study and evaluatian on a cantinuing basis af the problem and of suggestioa► for the alleviatian of the sam�; thraugh iniaafion, coordinaaon and promaio� of reasonable and effecave procedures, control and reguladons, consistent with the safe operation of the airport and of aircraft usiug the sams; and through dissemination af infocmation to the affected cammunides, tl�eir affected residents, and the users of the sirport respecting tl� problem of aincraft noise nuisance and in respect to suggestions made and actions initiated and taken to alleviate the problem. � Metropolitan Aircrati Sound Abatement Council Representation The membership shall include representadves appointe�i by agencies, corporations. associations and governmental bodies which by reason a� their st��uto�+ authority and responsibility � control aver the sirport, or by reasa�n of their status as airport users. have a diract interest in the operation af th� airport. Such members will be callsd User Representatives and Public Representatives, pravided that the User Representatives and Public Representalives shall at all times be equal in nwnber. The Airport ?fl-hour Noise Hotline rs �26-9411. Complaints to the hotline do not result irs changes in Airport activiry, but provides a public sounding boacd aad airport informadon outlek The hotline is staffed 24-hours Monday - Friday This report is pe�epared and printecl in house by Traci Erickson, ANOMS Specialist Questions or comments may be directed to: MA� - Aviation Noise & Satellite Program 1�Tinneapolis /8t Pau1 Intemafional Airport 6040 28W Avenue South Mmneapolis; MN 55450 . _ Tel:.(612) 725-6331, Fax: (612) 725-6310 1Vletropolitan Airports Commission Aaiation Noise Programs - � �; ; � • �� . �� Operations and G'ompdaint �uanmary 1 . ._) _ Operations Summary All Aircraft ....................... . . ...........................:.-.................. .1 . .. .... ..... MSP Decernber Fleet Mix Percentage .......................................... ..................1 ..................... .Airport December Complaant Summaxy .................... December Operations Summary - Airport Directors Ofiice ............ .................................1 �i,r� ''� ,, i� i� i� � r i; i Complaint Summary by City ......................................:. .............2 .......................................... � ' I � � ' 7 / AllHours ..............................................................................................................................3 NightttmeHours ........................................: .............................................. .....3 ...................... Runway Use Report December 1995 .....................................................:•..�...........................4 Carrier Jet Operations § Runway Use Report December 1995 ...............:.. . , . / �r i � i .............................................................5 Runway Use Report December 1995 ..................... ' , r . ..... .................................................:..6 ' ' � ' � �`�� r � Runway Use Report December 1995 .........:.........................................................................7 Carrier� ,�et Operat�ons by Type 8 � '' / � � � � � ) , � � � � , I I � � �' / / � � � �' a' , � i � � / Dayti.me Hours ............................ .......................................................................................10 Community OverfZight Analysis 11 � Carrier Jet Operations - All Hours ........................:...................... .:....................11 � ................ ( ) Cairier 7et Operations - Nighttime (l lpm - 6 am) ....................................... .....11 Aviation Noise Programs lzemote 1Vloniioring ►�i�e �ocactions 12 � ' ' •" �: ' � � � / � � � � Count of Arrival Aircraft Noise Events for Eacli RMT .....................................................13 � ' ' I`�ri , �, � ,� � , , ,; Count of Departtu�e Aircraft Noise Events for Each RMT ................................................14 T'en ,�oudest Aircraft Nozse Events identi, f'ied ' / /', ` � �' , , /,' ',,� ' / �` , . ,1 � , , ; � , , � � � � . . � � . . ; � . � / � / / i � �, � ` � / �, �/ ' • � �, . , , � , , �, ,�, ' , � ;; � , � �; _ j Airport 1Voise and Oper�ations Nlonitoring �ystems Flight Tracks 22 Carrier Jet Operations - December 1995 .....................................:.............................. Ai�oy°t No�se and Operat�ons Monitor�ng S'ystem Flig�ht Tracks ...22 23 Carrier Jet Operations - December 1995 ...........................:...................:..............:............23 Ai��art Naise and Operaiions Monitorin,g System Flight Tracks 24 Carrier Jet Operations - December 1995 ........ ................................ ......... ..... 24 Ai�port Noise and Operations 1Vlonitoring System Flight Tracks 25 Carrier Jet Operations - December 1995 ........................................:.............. ................... 25 Analysis of �.ircraft Noise Events - Aircraft-Ldn dB(A) 26 ,, �� _ � � Analysis of A.ircraft Noise Events - Aircrafi Ldn dB(A) 27 Aviation Noise Programs _._ �. . i�� , u Metropolitan Airports Commissioai C�perat�ons and Compiaini Summary . . i)ecerrgber �1995 .Operations Summary - All Aia�craft NYSI' Dece�nber Fleet 1Vdix Y'ercentage Airport December Camplaint Summary i)ecember Operations Summary - Airpart Directors Office l J. � Aviatiaai Noise & Satellite Programs � Page 1 Metropolitan Airports Commission , Ni�na�eapolis - St. Paul Interna�ionai A�rport Complaant 5umrnary _ ._ I�e�ember 1995 _ _ Complaint Sununary by City Q Page 2 :>::::>::::>.:<:,.:>:>::::::::::»:<:::::>:::::;:>::::<::;:::::::::�::> :::::>�;::::>��<:»::::>:::::>:::::::>::::::::>:::>;: »::::�»::::>::;;»>:>::>:::><:<::::;::::::>:::::: ::::>::>:::::::;:::>::>:::::>::>:;::>:::>:::::<::::;::::> :::::::�>:::>�:::::::;::;>::>;::::>::::::>::>:::::>:::< ::;:::::::;::>::>::>:::::::>: >: � : ::: :::>:::::: >: ::::: :::: <:>: <:> ::::::: : :.: : :: : : . . . . . . . .. � : : : .: : : : : : : :.: : .: � : : : : : : : : : .: : : . : � : : : : ............. ;;>;::.::. .;;:; : .......:..:.. ...:..:. :::>:: :::::::::::<:::<:.. . �:.; �::: ::>:::�<:::::::> :.,:.. .:::.�::.�:::::: :::;:.;:>�;:>::: :: :><:;«::<:::�?�r.. ::<::::;;: :>::::: . . ..........:::.::...............�,....'��.�, .<;.:.::.,.;.::.,:.::.:::.::.::.::.:�::.::: :>::>�:::::::::� . � ::::::::<::::::: <:�> �: . > . . ::>:::::::>:::»::.::::<:>::>::::>::::::::;. ....�� ...:..:... .... . �: � ; ::>:<::: . �i�:.� ...................�. ..............�' . ;:> ... .. ... � ..................�r��n . .;:.>:.::.:.::.::.;:.::.:::.;:.:�:.:;:;:::::::::.>:.::�:::>:::»:::::�::>:<:::::>;::::::::::::::>::: :.::::::::::::::::....:.....::.:.:::. ::.�:::::::. :....... ............. ..... . . � �.. ...:�:::.� .: :..::: ......... .....:.:::.: �.: �: :.:::::::.�: ..:.:::: .:. �::::::::::::::::::: .... .. ::.»::.:.::.:>::.:;;:;::;:;:.::.�.� :::::::::::::::::<.>;::.;:.;:::::::.:;.:;::;>::.:: ::.;;:;:.::;:::.::.:::::::.::.:::>.:::.::::. .... ....�.::.� Apple Ualley 3 9 � 12 2.8% Bloomington 1 13 14 3:3% � Burnsville 5 � 12 17 4.0% Carver 0 1 1. 0.2% Cottage Grove 1 0 1 0.2% Eagat� � 48 65 113 26.8% F.dina 0 • 1 1 0.2% Golden Valley 0 1 1 0.2% Inver Grove Heights 1 2'7 28 6.6% Lakeville 1 1 2 0.5% Mendota 0 1 1 0.2% Mendota. Heights 4 9 13 �3.1% Minneapolis 64 129 193 45.'7% l�Zinnetonka 0 1 1 0.2% Oakdale. 1 0 1 0.2% Plymouth 1 0 1 0.2% Richfield 1 8 9• 2.1% Roseville 0 2 2 0.5% St.: Louis Park 1 0 1 0.2% St. Paul 0 1 1 / 0.2% South St. Paul 0 8' ' 8 1.9% West St. Paul 0 1 1 0.2% � '�'�i4'i;iii•:iiii�ri}�ii :%<Y�ir: T: r:i�l�i:>�if.�¢i:iy.};iii::::ii)i i' •: r.r::. .. �::::'t;::%::;:,`::::v:;,••r•: • •:::. :. ...w . `<`:2+:..,. . '•%:�:tiv%:%:� :� ;�:�;r�, ,...... .. �::k:: :: ........................... ;,,. ............. .:;•:.�::::::::::.;�::.�.�::. ::. :::��v?;'+::�'�::�:�:�: #:`•%:'•'':F��:?�:�:':�%'' ' . .:��`�?i�>:`•��i�:r:`•: :: _ .............: .: ........ :..: ....... .. �3::$:'•::;:;;::;:;%.: •:::.:ii'''•::�:::'•;:;:j;: S: :.::::::.; :,; •:::.:::.>�::.;; .': �� ............. �:::.,•::::::: •: : ::::•::: %;�.::.: :< . :.: : : : : : : : : : : : .; :;;: .:.: .;..: • •: • : � : <.: :`,:"i,'�::•.'•'::; ..::: :. ,:;.,..,�i�:;'r.?;:;i:;:i;o:.: •: :: :;:':::�� ::'•..:... .. '` Time of Day - - Nature of Complaint Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs � C� Metropolitan Airports Commissio�t i Availalbie �'ime %r iZunway IJse i ; 'Tower Log l�eport� - I)ecernber 1995 � Alt Ixours . ...... �:il`�.><` '' � � ��...:::::�:::::::: �:::::::�:�::' ��:::: ��;::�`:;<::>:;>.: Nighttime Hours m �oo ov • �� o� � � � 29 �o :�:::>:::::�:::�::;::::::: 04 �``��::�;:��"� ,�., . �<::;��i::�::.. Aviation Noise & Satellite Rrograms i Page 3 i � Metropolitan Airports Commission . � � . � � I' � ' ''�1 1. . �. � , Page 4 Aviatioa Noise & Sabellite Programs � �� Metropolitan Airports Commissi� Carraer � Jet Operations 12unway Use It.eport I�ece�nber 1995 �_`::>:�>: ��:`U?�`�: Aviatia�n Noise & Satellite Programs Page 5 Metropolitan Airnorts Commission ' ' . ,' `� � . , � 1 ' ,� 1 � � ,, � .�� . �,• �� "� , Page 6 � Aviatiaai Noise � Satellite Programs C � � Metropolitan Airports Commissioai �Tighttime Carrier Jet Operations Iaunway Use I2eport December 1995 ><:::::::;�*��:�: Aviatia� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 7 Metropolitan Airports Commission : Carrier Jet_ i)perations by 'I'ype lDecerriber 1995 � Page 8 ::»::::::::» :::;�?`:::::::<:�::>:��::�;`:;:`:;:::::::::;:::'::::`;::::;:::'`::::�::.::�:;:::��:::�::::::::;.:°::::.: <:;::��.�:::...>::::>::::::::>::�:;:::;<::..>:::::;:::.;; .....,...... > :::::.:' `�r�.. ... `�1z�.... ...:::.:.: �ot�t...::>�>�.:> .:::�'��c+�t�g�... B707 0 0.0% B727H 223 0.9% B733/4/5 847 � 3.5% B747 218 0.9% B74F , 9 0.0% B757 2039. �$.4% � - B767 0 0.0%. BA46 71 0.3% CL65 3(34 ' 1.2% DA10 6 0.0% DC 10 943 3.9% DC87 186 0.8% DC9H 2590 10.6% EA31 60 0.3% EA32 2152 8.8% FK10 1063 4.4% L1011 56 U 2% I1/ID 11 10 0.0% MD80 1129 4.6% BA10 4 0.0% BAll 2 0.0% 8727 3538 14.5% B737 1365 5.6% DC8 163 0.7% DC9 7416 30.4% FK28 0. 0.0% <�:<:::;::<::�'<"��:'��>::><:::::::::::;:: ��:;��:::�;<��>�';..;:.`.:"�;:::<;<:<:<':' `:::::':::>:��:;>':'";::;::::�`<:<:;::::;::::: :.:::::::: ��..`'........�............:.;:.;;;.::>: ::;::»;.>:.;;�.��:.::>:.;:.::.: -� Aviatiaa Noise & Satellite Programs ': :', �i� ll' � � 51.2°/a Stage II . � .; , '� 1 B�m B727. B727H B733 B737 B73S B747 B74F B757 B767 BA10 BAll BA46 Q.GS DA10 DC10 DC8 DC8S DC86 DC87 DC9 EA31, �]J2 x �lo FK27 • FK28 L1011 MDll 1bID80 SW3 SW4 SF34 Meaopolitan Airports Commissia� A�rcrait Id.entif�er and I�escriptionTable BOIING 707 BOEIlVG 727 BOIING 727 - HITSH KTT BOEING 73'7-300 . BOEING 737100lZ00 S�S BOEII�TG 737 � BOEIl�TG 747 , BOEING 747 FREIGHTER BOEING 757 . BOEII�tG 767 BRITISH AII20SPAC� 125 BRTITSIi AEROSPACE 111 BRTTISH AII20SPAGE 14fi � CANADAII2 650 FALCON 10 MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC10 • . MCDONNEI.L DOUGLAS DC8 MC�OIYNEL'L DOUGLAS DC8 STRETCI� C MQ�ONNII.,L DOUGLAS DC8 60-SII2IES MGDONNEL.L DOUGLAS �DC8 70-SERIFS RE 'MGDOnfNEL.IL DOUGLAS DC9 AII2BUS INDUSTRIES A310 AIRBUS IlVDUSTRIES A,320 FOKI�2100 FOI�IIZ F27 (PROP) FOKK.IIt F28 L0� TRISTAR L1011 MQ30NNELL DOUGLAS DCl l MCDONNELL DOUGLAS DC9 SO-SIIttES SVVFjARi.NGEN METROLINER 3 SWEARINGEN MLTROLINER 4 SAAB 340 . Aviatia� Noise & Satellibe Programs G Page 9 Metropotitan Airports Commission � r r , . �; � � � . : 1 1' �' ,' 1 . ' . . i! �.' � � , . �� i � 1 1 Daytime H[ours iVighttime Hours Page 10 Aviati� Noise 8c Satellite Programs C Metropolitan Airports Commissi� Community Civer�ight Analysis " IVIIiIIIea�DOI1S - St. Paul In�ernational Airport �December 1995 Carrier Jet Operations - Atl FIours Carrier Jet Opera.tions - Nighttime (11pm - 6 am) Aviation Noise & Satellite Frograms Page 11 Metropc�� itan Airports Commission � • , , � • � ;, � �' . � � i , . � 1 ! ` . 1 `� i ' ', , ,� , � �, �, . Page 12 Aviation Noise & Sabellite Programs C C Metropolitan Airports Commissio�n . ' ' ' ' . � ' ., . �i 1 . , Count o� Arrival Aircraft l�ioise Events for Each RMT ::::'::::>�;�:.�?;::��.::::'';�:`' ` >�:`:��:::::��:�::>�>:�`��<::>�::':>>��::>�:::��::<�::;'::<::<:��;`:';:�:>�:::>:::::�:::;::;>�:�;>�:>�::::��>�::::::��:<��::>:>:'::':'::::::>�::�><�>`��::;:::>::>::':::::::��:::>:::<:��:>�:':>�:>::::;�:::<:':::>::::><;':::��`�'`:�::;:::�:::``;`::`:::`:::::>: >::;':':��:'�:�::':::;;:>::::::'>:::::::;.;.;::>.:;;..».<;;::;:;::::::::::<:::::..:;>,::::':<:.>��>:''><::':::»:::>:;>::::>;>: ::>::>:::<:>:<:>:>:.>;:.;:: :: > ... .:::.::::::.;�::... ... ..: .:::.:::::::.: .: . �� i��. . ��:en� ��en: : .:... �� ..:.:::::� ::::..::::::::::::.:�::�:::. :::::<:_::>::::;>.t�; �. .>::;:::::>:::::::::«:::>::>::>:::::: . ; : :::::::::>:::�:::�:��: ::��::>::::<:>::::: :::::>;:::>::: .�� ........ .... . .. . : ; � . �•:: .. . .. ..... .....�► . .�� : . . :. ..: ::: .. : . ::::>::: <�:<:::;::>:;:::::::::>::>:::::;:::>:::::: ::::::>:«:>:;::>:::::::>::::::::;:::::::: :::>:::<:>::>�:::.:::.:::::.:.:::<::<:::>:::>:>:::::>:.:>�::>�.>:>::.;:<.<:>:: ..:.::.::. . .. :.:. �:.::: .:. �. �:. �:::..::::: ........ ..................... ......... . ......................... :��r�+�..:��.��::::<:: ;:::::.»;� .: :: . �.:>;:. .::.:::.::.: . : . .:::: .:::::::. . : . ..... ....... . .. ... :::::::::. . .. :..�::.:�: .::::::::: :.::.... :::.::::.�.::::: :.:::.�::::::..:::.:...: �!�.::::.�:::::::::::::::: :::.::::::: :.::.:..:.:.:: :.: :.: :................ ::::. ... . . ::::: :..�: ... . :::.: .:.:. ... :. :: :::.:.:. : . . . .::. ,, :.::.>:.::.::�:;:::::. �: ::::. �::::::::.: �:.::.;:.:::.;:.>:.;:.:.::.:.::.::.:::.,:.> :.:.:::.: :.::.::.:<>.>::>:::�.::.::.>:.::.:.:�.:�.:.;:.::.::.:�«:<:::::::::: ::.::.:::::.:::.:::.::::: .>:.>::::.::::.::.>:.: .::.>:.: .. .::. .:::: �f�,��.d�3::<::: :>::: �.. . . :.:::::::::.�::::: ;;:.>:::.: ; ::.:::::::::::.::�:::::::::::.�::.�::::: :.::.:�:: ::::::::::::::.:::::::.�::.::.:.::�:: <..:.::<:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ... .. .. . � ::::» :»::>. :.: . :::>::>: :<:::. .: : .......................... .:::.:::.�::.::................................... ...................................:.::::.::::::.�:::::.:::::::::: :.:..:: ::........... ........................:.. . :.:�... �.�.: ::. .:.::��..��3..... ...��:::::: - 1 Minneapolis Xerxes Avenue c� 41st Street 2286 72 3 0 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd Street 184U 227 2 0 3 Minneapolis W Elmwood Street & Belm�t Avenue 2152 1004 35 0 4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue &.49th Street 2004 612 6 0 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 2222 1595 497 1 6 Minneapolis 25th Avenue & 57th Sh�eet 1893 1353 262 0 7 Richfield � Wentworth Ave & 64th Street 14 6 2 0 8. Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Strcet 23 5 0 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street 8c Harlford Avenue 18 4 0 0 10 S� Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 36 . 12 0 0 11 St. Paul Finn Sireet & Scheffer Avenue 11 1 � 0 0 ::r:�:':::i::�i4i':::�::�:�:��:::::� :::::::�:':::��:':::%::`�`;::�..`::::::".:':siis::r.:::::::�:;:'::i:::::�::::%: �:::::''::;:::�:i;; ::::::::.::::;'.:::;:::;:;::;::r..y;:::;i.i;::,,::::i;r:':::::::::�:::::s:?::.,5:::;.::::;::::;::::::i:;;=,;::::::;'';:::::::'::::y}':::::5':::�'::`::r:�:::�::'::: �:::2::::::::::::�::t=St:�:`::::�::<::::`' ::::'::''::'::::��::::i:::':::<:r:ii':::::::::::::::��::::::>`:i�:i:%Y:::::::::::::::::::3:: �:: �4 p� yy ::;:: .......... : ............. . %7��F �y,�, t �h4/E4: .�. . ✓.� S#4%'�� ::::::::::::::::::::.:�:.: .:...:.......:. . . .............:...... ......... . . ��.:��.v. . .:. .....::.�:::.:::::::::.�::.. :.::.>:.:t.:�:::.::::.�:::::: ::. .::>:.�:::::::::::::::::::: :.::::::;:.::::.:�;:.:::.x::::: � �:.>;:.s:.::.;:::.>::;.:.::;:.::•:::: i:.i::::.::::;:::i::::::::;:::::::::G:;::::::::::::::::::::::::2:2:::::::::::::;:::%::::i::;::::::::::::;::r::>::::;:::� :::::::::::::::::£:22;:i::;::::::;::::::::�::;::;i::;::::::::::::::::::::>::::::::::::: ;t:;�:;:::::::i::::::::::::::::::::::::i: :::::::;:;::�i::2t:::::;::;:::::::%:::i: ;:%::::::::::�:::::::::;:::::::;:::::::::::::;:::;:.:::::�:::::::::::::;:::::;;:;::::::'�::: 13 Mendota Iieights Southeast end af Mohican Court 24 . 2 0 0 14 Eagan First Street & McKee Street 6070 214 2 0 15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street & Lexingtan Aven� 179 9 0 0 16 Eagan Avaloai Avenue & V'�las Lane 4758 2533 24 0 17 Bloomington 84th Street Fi 4th Avenue 52 18 0 Q 18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 63 13 0 0 19 Blalmingtan 16th Avenue & 84th Street 5 0 0 0 20 . Richfield 75th Street 8c 3rd Avenue 6 0 0 0 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Street 32 0 0 0 22 Inver Gmve Heights Anne Marie Trail . 2892 39 0 0 23 Mendota Heights End of Kendon Avenue 1667 36 4 1 24 Eagan C�apel Lane & Wren Lane 4864 132 0 0 * Site 12 is experiencing equipment problems. Aviatio�► Noise & Satellite Programs Page 13 I�ietropolitan Airports Commission Carrier Jet I)eparture l�elated No�se Events Count of Departua�e Aircraft Noise Events for Each RiVIT � �;:::::�1;��`:>'<:: ':>>:::<:�>:�«;�:<":>;;:;::;':<':::»�:;:�:::<::�:> ::::::::::::::::`:;' ��':�:>:'>::::>`;:>�::':::::<:>�::`:::::�;��<°:«'::>�::<:�:�:�>:�i�:::<::':::::::��:'�:::::::>::<::::::�;::::::��::<:::::�:>;>:::::�:>::<::::;;;>:..:<':<:>>:.:::::�»:;:::.;:::::: €::::::;'»<.<.;.>..>`.::.>>�:::::';.>: :::;::::.� ��;::<:;::::»::>.«::;;.:; �:::;<:;;.;::::..::::::::;:><:::��>;:<:<:: .'�..:: ...:..:::�>:;:;:.;;::...;;;;;;:;:.;;::.>::��,�a� .......��. ::. :;::> ::.;:>;:;:.::::.;::.:.;:.:::. . ....:._Y.::::.:.:: �::.;:. : .: .� . . . .::::::................�.......:....�:��.:::.::..��v. n :::.:.::::�.:. r� .... .;::.:»:::.::::::::::::::.;: ::.:.::.::.:::�:.:;.::::<.:.>;� : :::;:.:::;>;::.::.:>;:.::,:: .. .. . : ... . ..... ......:::::::::.�::::.::.................................:.:.:::::::�...�.............��...�::.. .;:;.;�.:;:.:� ..::. .� :::::::. .::.:,:;.:;:>.;;:::.:.::.: . � ....:::,::.:>:;:.;:.::.:<..::.:�.. :. .. .;..: . .::.;:.:.:;;:::<:::..:�:::.::.::;:.>;:::.::>:.;;:.::.::::.::;:;.:.::.;:.:>::;>:::::::::::.<..:.;:.;:.;:>:<.:.:;,::.:;;;::.;;::�;::.�::.;:.: :.:;::::.:::. . . .::.� ::::: .::::::.�.�:::.�::.�.�:::.�.�'.`::::::: :.:::::::::. :.:::�: : . ��+a:.��..�..��r�€.:::: :::::<.:: . .. .:::.: :::::::: .: .::.:. ::::: ::: ..: ..�.....::::.:..�::.�:..: .:.:.:.:::.�.:: .......... . . :.:::::::: .:::: :.:.�:::::.:�::.�::: :.:....:.::::::::::.::::..:::::::: �............... :..::::::::::::::::.�::.:�::::: :.:::::::::::.::.�....:.. .... .. .. : . ::::. :,::..:: . : <.. ........ . :. .:::.: :.::.:.: .. .. ..�. .::::::.::.:�� ::: :.:::: ::.::::::.:�::.::�::.�.�::::::;,:::;::::::::::::::..:::::::::::::<.;;:,:::.;;::::;:;;:.>�.::.:.:;�:::::::::::::.::.�:::::::::::::.::<.:: :.:: ::.:�.:.::,:, � .. . � ::.:.: ::::. . ::�:> .>:.;;�. ��:::>;:.;;;:� . ::::.:.>:.::<;:.::::::::::::>::::>:: :>;:;.;<:::�;;;;:,;;:.;:;::.::.;;:.>;:.:::::> :::::::::::.:::::>::::::::>::>;.:::::.:>;;;:.;;:.;::;.;.:.::,:;:::<:::;:»::>::>:::::>:::>::»::>:::::>:::>«:::;�:.:.>;;:.;::.: . .....�. :::::;::: ::::::::.. �. ::::.:::.;. �,: : � : >:: :......................... ..:.::..::.�::::.�::.:�::::::.................... ........:..::::::.................................................:.::::::::::::::::::..:.:....................... ....... ��..�:: .....��...4�. .��::;::>::::>:�:�:� .. . . :::: ........................... ::::.:�.�:::::............. ............ ��.. 1 Minneapolis Xerxes-Aveuue & 41st Street � 633 .........202 ......... ............1.. ...::.�:..:::: :.::::.:p�.�:::::::: 2 Minneapolis Fremont Avenue & 43rd St�eet 837 243 3 0 3 l�nneapolis W Flmwood St�et � Helm�t Avenue 1202 222 14 0. 4 Minneapolis Oakland Avenue & 49th Street 1554 454 57 2 5 Minneapolis 12th Avenue & 58th Street 3968 2070 684 92 d Minneapolis 25th Avenue &. 57t1i Street 5133 3158 1524 396 7 Richfield Wentworth Ave & 64th Street 2410 727 64 2 8 Minneapolis Longfellow Avenue & 43rd Street 1498 40L 13 0 9 St. Paul Saratoga Street & Hartford Avenue 38 5 0 0 10 St. Paul Itasca Avenue & Bowdoin Street 313 . 10 0 0 11 St. Paul Firm Street & Scheffer Avenue 43 3 � 0 0 `::::>::::> �:��::�;::::`€:::':::>: :�':�:�`::;:::::�:<;::::;;':>:::;>.;:�<;:��":::;;:>::>�<:>�:::��;::' >"::;:`;:':; :';<;:,,::;::::::..::::<»::::::�:::..:';..:;':::::,;;..;<;<:>:::>::::.:::::>:>>.,.,:<.::::>::::::::::::>:::::::>�;<::::::�::::::<:::€:<:::::<`�:::':::>:<:�::��:> :::::: :::::::>:::::�:�:::;::>::::>::::::::>::::::: ::>:�:::�::>:::::�`<::;;:::::>;:::::;::::::::::;:::::::>:;:<:::::::::::':::>::::::::::::s �� .:: ;:: >::: ....................... . .��.:�€.�:�. ; ::::::::::........:........ ............. . : . . ::.::.::;.:.;:.;:.;:.;::;:.::::::::::::::: :.>:.;:.;::.;::.;::;.;:.;.:::.:�:. :::.�::::::.�:::>:.>;::.;:;:.:.:.::.::.;:.:;;:;::::::::: :.:::.: ::::::.� ::.:............... ............. :.:.::::::::......................:. ::::::::::::::::............................:.':'t�ta�:�1��....... ........:.:.:::::.�::...... .......................�::. .�::....................... ............::::.�::.:.... ............................................:::..:::::::::::::::::::::::.�:. :::::::::::.>:.;:.::.:::.>:.;:.::.: :;:<.;::.::.::.;::;:.>:.:;:;;.::;.; ::>:::::::;:«::::::::>::::>::::::::>:::: 13 Mendota Heigbts Sautheast end of Mohican Court 1548 349 7 p 14 Eagan First Stre�t & McKee Street 2368 671 44 1 15 Mendota Heights Cullen Street Rc Lexingtoa� Avenue 1324 350 16 0 16 Eagan Avalo� Avenue & V'�las Lane 19�17 641 % 96 7 1'7 Bloomington 84th Stre�t & 4th Av�nue 143 12 2 p 18 Richfield 75th Street & 17th Avenue 354 164 56 2 19 Bloomington 16th Avenue & 84th Street 256 105 16 0 20 Richfield '75th Street & 3rd Avenue . 167 18 2 p 21 Inver Grove Heights Barbara Avenue & 67th Sh�eet 614 146 1 0 22 Inver Grove Heights Anne Marie Trail . 745 140 3 0 23 Mendota Beights End of Kendon Avenue 2105 992 336 27 �' �8� Chapel Lane & Wreu Lane 1560 302 5 0 * Site 12. is experiencing equipment problems. C Page 14 Aviatio�n Noise & Sabellite Programs 0 i j Metropolitan Airports Cammission Ten I.oudest Aircraft l�Toise Even�s Iden�ified RMT #1: Xerxes Ave. & 41st S� IVdinneapolis RMT #3: W. Elmwood St. & Betmont AVe. Minneapalis RMT #2: Fremont Ave. & 43rd St. 1Vlinneapolas RMT #4: Oakland Ave. & 49th St. Manneapolis _ Aviatian Noise & Satelli6e Programs Page 15 I�tetropol ita.n AirPorts Commission -'Ten Loud.est Aircraft Noise Events Id.entified. RMT #5: 12th Ave. & SSth S� Minneapolis RMT #7: Wentworth Ave. & 64th St. Richfield RMT #6: 2Sth Ave. & 57th St. � Minneapolis RMT #8: Longfellow Ave. & 43rd St. 1Vlinneapolis Page 16 Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs Metropolitan Air�orts Com�iissia�n ' � � ;. .; � . . �; . . �' � � RMT #9: Saratoga S� & �-Iartford Ave. St. Paul RMT #11: Finn St. �i Scheffer Ave. St. Paul RMT #10: Itasca Ave. & Bowdoin St. S� Paut ILIVIT #12: Alton St. & Rockwood Ave. S� I'aul Aviation Noise & Satellite P'rograms Page 17 Metzopolitan Airports Commission _�'en I�oudest Aircraft liToise Events Id.ent�fied RMT #13: Southeast End of Mohican Court Mendota �Ieights RMT #15: Cullon St. & �e�ngton Ave. Mendota Heights RMT #14: lst S� & 1VIcKee S� Eagan RMT #16: Avalon Ave. & Vilas Lane Eagan Page 18 Aviatio� Noise & Satellite Programs �. � , � ) Metropolitan Airports Commissi� Ten I�oudes� Aircraft I�Toise Events Ident�fied RMT #17: 84th St. & 4th Ave. Bloomington R1VIT #19: 16th Ave. & 84th St. Bloomington RMT #18: 75th St. & 17th Ave. Richfield 12/03/95 9:35:08 12/27/95 10:26:37 1224/95 7:48:54 12/30/95 1:00:10 12/03/'95 7:42:13 12l27/�5 8:53:54 l�2/27195 10:13:55 12^03/9S 9:15:30 12/27Ig514:04:01 12/26/9511:09:19 B727 102.8 B727 101.0 B727 99.7 DC9 99.2 B727 99.1 B727 99.0 DC9 98.9 SW3 98.4 DC9 98.1 B727 � 97.7 RM'I' #20: 75th S� & 3rd A�e. Richfield Aviatia� Noise & Satellite Programs Page 19 Metmpolitan Airports Commission Ten Loudest Aarcraft -Noise E�ents Identified RMT #21: Barbara Ave. & 67th St. Inver Grove Heights RMT #23: End of Kenndon Ave. Mendota I�eights RMT #22: Anne Marie Trail Inver Grove Heights RMT #24: Chapel Ln. & Wren Ln. Eagan ; Page 20 Aviatiaa� Noise & Satellite Programs �� ' Metropolitan Airports Commissia� �+'l�ghi Z%ack �ase 1VIap � Airport l�oise and. C�perations 1Vlonitoring System Aviatian.Noise & Sabellite Programs � Page 21 t .,�, �`T\, � , :\1` . � � y4. � , . 1 •, � \�; � �.I �� . �h �C • � I � _ . �� . � ' �\`� �\t _ . �► ''� = '�`�� * `'� .1:. � .�� ;.- - - a�`� =�r��_0 � �.�+�,�\:��' ��• t �:.�.`� 1,�� `�' . i s \```—\�� i � `� ��' �'j S \ ��\`.� � ��I�� \\'�, � � � .� �n..�. t� �� I ��,,` — s !C.ii'� ./C �� 11 •.:��••-�%a� ��.��,1�� - .��q? // � � � a� . .,� � � � � �. . , ' n � I . , . �. � e' ..�/.t i: � tl�i �: n (� i �I��I , 4 � /� � � 1 J .'��'� ..�,\ �'�/�/Il, ii 1 /. l� '1 ��``� . . ^ �" , I �'~�� / 1♦ � `+j' �S.-�i��\"`� � �'��r�. . � ��° �� ► ..'•iil�\\l��\�� I�%Er r�V.tr� :U=�',�� \` � �. r[•-;,� �:i:.� �� •� l��s��'"n91�:� %�\,,:. � .,.• . ...��...�„�._ .�: \�•- � �� , - :.. ��:� � � . � r.� .- ,,, � ;v�:� � �, '`�� ; ,� . � �� ,.�� ,�, �t �\� \\.` 4 �.: ti ` � \�:� � . :�� +� � . � .. � ' ..�.'�.�� ;� �, � \\��. �\ � �\�.�� . � � � ,r'-;,,_"�� \"� � : .� ; . � \"�`�� ►�.!.i � la�i�`�: �' t.� 4� � � �"'.i:�.� ! ��1�i .� �I2' �� - .� .,,�I��. • �� /.��. a nr • ♦:=�1 -� 1�/ ',� � 1 y �l\, i _ �'� � � .�\��,� � �� ' � � \�1'�, ��•�. s �. . . .`L',� . ...... . . . . • •.. -• . . .�:.:� ... i ; •, , ,f . \ �� . � .. `; `\.. . .. � .. . �� . r `;` ��\\ ' C; � ` \`,�\`�` � $� i Y �" ; ` " . ,� , � s ' c��' �r ' . . � : t.�.� '��: . �:G r � // �� r - : i � • a / � :�� . i � � � ( � �� - �. �f�O ; • . +/1/ i �� ; •' • . ; ♦ „ .. .��r� —_ " � : I ��)�� '.. •. !� � '�� I') — � \li�0i �� 1 -� Y��\\~ I�!� rl� :. � �, � // /I �/ -„" :, ,� 1 �,�►�.,.. •. � .'`"�'"-�av �.� :• ' ��i �.�\�►�:�. �.11�� "1�� r: �.�- ..► Or �� ,,.��,. ,� _.. -..�: .��►��. �r�.��'L �I S�"�1\.�' ��i �'�Lr i'�*-�`\\ � �� .' '��i'��-"�%�.�.��11'�Il�.��_� `� ..... �._ � . . r 1 ' 4 ��\" ` �_"�"'l.�� ' � t f �� , '.�" - . � . � , \`\`, \��,�� D � �\►� ' , �� / �.I ;��,� ,�r.' \:��,�' � �,' � , �� C�` � " j , � .� �\ . - .� � �,' .� � � �,__� .. ' � , n .� :�� ,n � . � . . . � :` � `. d j 0 . .y '\ , - \��`� �`i+►'"e' Q� ' � Y,,,, � � � � � _ \�� ' � 3�/��/ � �'� , i � �� ,��i�I�(��i� � �� ._-. . Ii I I � 9 • �trl ' .. �.� /1� I ` f� I R /�i• _ .�,�.: - - ' �� ,�. f�,�,�: - :, .'; '�`'�g�!'''�, _ _� .,� :�: + � .� ;�, . _ ,�i/�, . ..� ' . � r � �_ , , .." v%i� �' ` :o' n — � _ �.:'�`` •!n, � �.` - �:� r►�.. . .�. �r�/�� ...� �I�I•+ ��=\ ` 1 \ ��-�IT �� , !'''� ♦ . �}►'' �..�-,�,D!►��; �' i, �, �� . -.� -�� -..� .►�� ` .. . ... . . �� •�� ` ' a�\�� . \, �\`�.� ./,�,� � �� \��`� � ....;s � � � ��\�\a;.\� �rr, � �A .`u� � ��.� �iw �. �� '�r� � ' \� �a' . \ , � �� '�� ' \ . i�ri ` . . ,,,,'�� . ,� ..: . •'�.�tl,r: � .... ►� ' - �:`�\�� , a. � ��' i/�i%/�/ � %��.►�i��\��.�:, � ' `� �� r , � / .., �/,�'�r �,�Le .. ..i .�, � ,� � � � � �: i � �S . ., ��,.. ��.;�.� �;� - y .. :��;:,�i,..: : ;� ,\ � ',, ; � ': \ , , ,`�\, ; . ' ` \: '' . _ `..� . �r:'�..�� Metrop�ritan Airports Commission ` . 1 ' , � .. � • � � � . . �. �. � �'�. . �. �; �� Noise Monitor Locations �..`..'�`�`::`}:`:::'::�::::'::�:: �>::::::::;.•,.:.x?::::::} :::.;::::::::5,�<.:::<:::> <:::�::��..x:'<:i.>::::::::::':.:;�,..``;<.;<::::::::::::;:;,...,,`'::::::::;� :::::>:{.'.`':.��:?:::>::<'>::''::'i::<::<:: ::::'»:�>;:::::::::::�:: ::5��;:�x.>SR.{::::,;} ::;::,:<>:::::::»:::::�: ?:`:::>`��:»,:;<r;:::.;'; .`:<:>>_��>��,:`'��`;;:::: s�.�+� ... .::.�;:�'�:.::: �Z ��:.::«,:.::�::.�:?�::.::.;;:.::::::�.��.,.::.::.; :;:::�:�::::: .:::::�.:::.� .::::.....�. k..::::: »::.::� ....�`�.�.. :. .: � : : : : : : : : :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . : : .: : : : : : ,.: : . � : : :.: .: : : .: : : : : .: : :.: : : . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . : . : :. . � . � : : : : : : : : . .: : : : : : : : : : : : :: : : : .: : : : : : : : : : : : : . :. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . : . � : �'�; �:.: : : . : : : .1' i�. .'�, �. . . . 1 56.5 57.6 61.4 62.8 73.8 78.1 * 59.7 52.9 51.6 41.6 * 2 59.4 59.8 65.8 65.3 73.5 76.2 * 58.0 41.5 52.6 44.9 * 3 57.4 57.8 57.2. 62.2 �0.'7 77.1 * 58.6 58A 48.7 47.2 * 4 59.8 62.6 69.0 66.0 73.0 73.2 * 51.2 48.2 55.0 41.4 * 5 54.6 54.9 57.'7 58S 69.4 70.9 * 56.6 58.1 432 48.4 * 6 56.5 57.6 56.4 60.3 71.4 ' 76.1 * 60.1. 46.9 52.8 50.7 * '7 56.4 5'7.7 63.4 � 62.0 73.4 76.1 * 59:3 51.8 54.0 44.5 � , � � $ 62.1 63.1 67.4 64.1 74.2 74.8 66.1 60.3 41.7 51.0 43.5 9 55.9 56.2 59.2 62.7 72.4 77.3 66.0 60.3 49.6. 57.9 49.4 * 10 51.5 57.5 57.8 64.6 66.2 72.0 58S 54.0. 42.6 59.2 41.6 * 11 48.2 54.3 56.9 57.6 67.2 70.3 48.1 � 465 * 54.0 � 49.0 * 12 58.4 59.8 65.8 6L� * 72.2 52.7 44.8 44.1 51.6 46J * 13 64.8 65.1 69.3 64.8 73.7 71.3 36.4 * 49.1 54.8 � 45.9 * 14 61.3 59.8 65.7 65.2 79.6 80.5 71.4 60.6 48.0 48.3 45.8 * 15 58.$ 57.6 60.3 62.8 72.9 77.2 65.2 60.3 51.�. 43.2. 48.5 * 16 56.5 58.3 65.3 62.8 72.2 69.8 38.5 48.7 40.7 525 47.1 * 17 55.8 � 58.7 64.0 61.7 71.8 70.6 43.2 52.8 44.5 56.7 49.6 * 18 60.'7 62.3 68.0 64.4 '74.0 70.4 40.2. 46.3 49.9 43.6 50.2 � 19 64.0 61.2 65.1 65.6 76.3 80.1 68S 62.0 43.8 62.5 43.Q * 20 59.9 60.9 63.6 64.2 76.4 80.4 68.8 ' 64.6 48.2 . 45.0 48.3 * 21 60.0 59.7 65.7 67.0 78.2 81,8 68.9 61.6 452 61.7 44.3 * 22 54.1 -r 45.6 49S 54.9 69.9 74.9 . 591 54.1 49.3 S1A 44.3 *^ 23 44.0 54.0 50.0 56A 68S 75.0 579 59.5 �* 51.3 50.3 * 24 53.2 55.0 55.2 60.7 71.4 765 64.6 57.4 45.6 46.0 49.5 * 25 4(1S .39.8 52.2 57.8 65.6 70.2 55.'7 495 50.'7 45.4 43A * 26 59.7 61.1 62.3 67.1 769 79.8 70.8 63.1 50.0 42.9 43.7 * 27 60.8 60.0 62S 64J 75.4 79.0 69S 63.4 � * 55.6 47.5 * 2$ 56.0 5�.0 62.8 60.1 73S 7�.9 63.9 60.6 52.6 61.6 48.1 * 29 54.0 59.5 64.9 67.2 80.4 81.5 69.1 63.9 51.4 52.4 41.8 * 30 60.9 62.6 67.1 64.4 74.4 71.1 55.3 57.7 55.3 52.8 56.2 * 31 62.1 61.6 68.'7 63.9 73.6 69.6 56.0 40.$ 41,8 59.4 40.7 * Mo. Ldn 60.9 60.8 65S 65.8 75.9 77.8 67.9 63.4 ' S6.8 62.1 54.4 * * Less Uwn twenty four hours of data available . P� � � Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Metropolitan Airports Commissio� ' ` . 1 ' , ' ,1 . .` ` • . 1 1 ,i � � . . � . � � � . . � . � � � Noise Monitor I.ocations . :::::��':::4��:;`�� `:��<:':�::;:>';.i:;::;:: :::s.:><:,>:::::..:�::;::;' �:::<�:.':�';`.'.:::::;' ::i:;�::.:.�:.��:.::�:>::>' ��>::"..`;..�:::.3::::<: �::;�:.�:�•:.�...�..�::<`;>::>:��>::.x.;x.::`:::>. ;:::::.:...::::.:.r .::::::::: :::::::'.:�'.��'..�''.��::>:::� �::,:;l::::;:::?.>::::::':: ,:::::;;r:<.::::::'.''{::.' :::;:::y:�:�:�:�";.<:::::;. .:.::: . �.� �� .:::. .::: ��.:::. :.:: ��:::: :.:: ��:::: ::: ��..�:. ::: �.::: .. �: �� ... � 1 55.7 64S 55.6 68.3 55.8 59.7 49.9 49.0 . * * 65.1 61.5 2 59.8 65.8 62.9 '70.4 559 6U.3 54.2 52.3 * 60.7 70.6 61.2 3 57.9 66.4 46.1 68.7 59.3 71.5 69.3 54.6 * 59.0 58.5 62.1 4 62.3 66.1 63.4 64.6 30.6 58.8 43.3 53.9 * 63.1 72.7 62.8 5 43.3 62.9 45.2 68.1 42.5 48.9 54.2 55.1 * * 58.1 63.0 ( 47.5 62.1 44.3 67.4 48.9' S8.8 56.5 52.2 * 56.4 55.6 61.5 � 56.3 65.8 57.1 67.4 , 43.4 52.5 46.1 42.0 * 5'7.9 67.1 61.7 �$ 56.3 65.2 58.1 69.3 56.5 45.6 43.2 50.2 * 60.3 66.5 65.7 9 56.4 65.0 * 69.6 41.4 41.5 58.5 47.2 * 60.2 58.7 64.4 10 60.7 63.6 58.6 68.9 52.6 65.5 61.3 53.0 * 53.2 49.4 58.2 11 60.4 61.9 4b.1 65.8 56.1 63.2 58.4 52.2 * 51.1 59S 55.4 12 64.0 70.0 63.8 69.1 48.6 51.0 5'7.0 62.8 * 60.5 70.3 66.9 13 61.6 65.2 61.2 65.3 59.1 43.6 61..6 462 * 55.8 70.9 61.3 14 52.9 66.2 58.2 70.7 51.4 48.3 51.8 52.2 49.6 61.9 66.9 64.7 15 56.0 66.1. 55.7 695 58.3 56.9 482 44.5 57.0 62.2. 66.7 64.3 16 63.0 66.7 64.2 67.7 49.8 53.6 * 48.2 60.0 61.9 72.5 63.7 17 62.1 66.4 61.9 68.9 61.6 S9S 41.2 47.0 60.7 61S 72.6 61.3 18 62.5 67.8 60.8 66.4 44.9 Qb:4 43S 43.8 " 64.4 59!4 74.4 65.8 19 48.9 63S 502 67.9 51.3 53.3 47.4 49.6 52S 58.2 62.5 61.1 2p 55.7 64.5 55.6 68.3 55.8 59.7 49.9 49.0 * * 65.1 61.5 21 59.8 65.8 62.9 70.4. 55.9 60.3 542 52.3 * 60.7 70.6 612 22 ,57.9� 66.4 46.1 68.7 59.3 71S 69.3 54.6 * 59.0 58.5 62.1 23 62.3 66.1 63.4 64.6 50.6 48.8 43.3 43.9 * 63.1 72.7 62.8 � 24 43.3 62.9 45.2 68.1 42S 48.9 542 55.1 * * 58.1 63.0 25 47S 62.1 44.3 67.4 48.9 58.8 56.5 52.2 * 56.4 SS.6 61.5 26 56.3 65.8 57.1 67.4 43.4 52S 46.1 42.0 * 57.9 67.1 61.7 27 56.3 65.2 58.1 69.3 56S 45.6 43.2 502 * 60.3 66.5 65.7 2$ 46.4 65.0 * 69.6 41.4 415 S8S 47.2 * 60.2 58.7 64.4 29 50.7 63.6 58.6 68.9 42.6 65S 61.3 53.0 * 53.2 49.4 58.2 30 50.4 61.9 46.1 65.8 56.1 63.2 58.4 52.2 * 51.1 59S 55.4 31 64.0 70.0 63.$ 69.1 48.6 51.0 57.0 62.8 * 60S 70.3 66.9 Mo. Ldn 61.2 67.8 64.6 70.6 59.0 65.2 62.2 58.1 63.2 62.3 71.3 66.4 � c.ess rnan nventy Jour nours ol aata axzuab[e � Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs Page 27 + t C _ _ _. . _ _ _ _ � _ _ � a"�� 'c';: \ � `�.,� � ` ...�' ..`` . �\\: �:,_ � ,"�.��;,�_�, •�\; 9 \�\\�\\,�.:.\� �\ �. �.��- ; � �� h � .\.�. �:. �:�..� \ � . � 11�1\ )� ��i ��, ... '�..�'�'� - �� .. . �. � ` . �. �. . ♦\� �� t � �. �� "� \ �.� �. � � q � � t t a �\\\•w.\ `.,,� y�-... �� „\\ �• ,` �" \� �' . ��' ♦ . �.1 �r h��\.i i1 u ��`� �\`\�~`�\��,' �,`\�^.�� \\ �� \' V ; � � � � \`�� ; ; 1 . �„�" `` � �� '�•`w� �. x ti 1� ♦y u A��' 9i \��\ ��\\\\�'. ... .�, \'\ \��.� \ti� � � z. � i: t �� c� ��. N U�t�1. ��►,�\�� \ �� \� .�~ �_\ "� �� \ �i a� � � �. !�\iii �`,��\�-\�.\~��o��y,� ��. � ,",,,\� �-, �` �� \\� � . �� . \ . � . . �t � t.t i \\ � �• � \ � �'.. ..� \-�� \ l � � i t 1 � i.y��fl. \'�-' �,.\ ►,.�\�.�� \_�. � �. � �.. ... v .� � � . , t i 4 r t `\�\`��.-��-�\�'�� . \� \ . � , � 1� �� f1 �,.�`+\�� \\, � �� \: � . �•�� .. � 11 1 . f ♦ � i • �i \ �...�\ `��.�\� �\ \� \�\ \ \ 't ti . �\ �1 � ��\r'�..� \.�\"-.\ '��\\,.,\�.'\� '`�� , ��...�� \�\�� `,` ` 1�� 1 +�i a . � �; � �`�-,.. �.� \�\ � ��.� ��\� . i �� \. `.��w+�� M ��., �t ��..._ �� \ � � �� \\ � � s "'�-`��\`►�.a\�`\\'�\�.\ ��\��\\-.o ��`�� , � ' ��I . � � ��a�t;.. �`.'-�--t'`+"\-rr..""``.- �1..�1�,��,��: �—.~,�� ,,,,,� �� \�\�•� � . � � �`�� . \ � � � � �� 1 � � : ��p�._�� " \\ � . .,. � �� .� \�� \� � \�., _ \ �i �r -; —�-�:� ...�."�r. .�`�-�.r,,,i......� ��.� .-. �.\ ��\ ��`l, . � • +1� .� . e y:� : ;-i "�'�•.._\_�.: � 1 �\��""` �`. � "�"��^ �`\\\ \ \ ' � . Y! �:"+-`�"�'^_. '`,\,1� .... \�. ��j�� '� �.\\ . \� � � � � � .. � f , ��.,.1_'�"�"'.._'��►.'�\�'�=` -� ��\�.�~ ��\�..\\\�\�\� � ��` ' � ��i t i�� ' �'�"' '+,1'�„".."�'',�\�`:�+.\ \ ��\ \`�.� \�� t 4 �! ,1. ��`� �M11`1 _"",,,--�►�e"'_`�...� \�� \ �\�`�- � �; \�� a�•� ::••`` `,.��__��\ . �� . � � :� ��•. �.-.. �\\♦ �: �� r- '�r�`"^�-�i� �r. --� �� `��. � � �� r_I� �11.�r-„�\ ._ r:.��\�-•.. � .` ,` � �_� �`,�� •."'� \�-�.�� -�+�\. "��`�`' "�� .. �:.�--� � �=r�,.►-� P �\�\i ��\\'�,.-.. �� \�. . \ .% -�. _ . --�� . \•� ; � ► � -` � �i„"�y\^^�\�_ +��. - � , / ,i,■►•-..��.■r ; �,�,�;`�,,�, -,..:: � -; ._....._r�e�c,�,•-��►i,..,,, ..�.., .,...,..�� f-� �r , `� ��, �� ";`,/��\ � � �• � -�i '! i ._ \,.;'��.►,,i;;••..,,,,, . _``,��,..�.�::.i.',\\►,..�.. � =:��:::: ,�.�� ; . . �. , � �'. °; = �� `��.� �...— �'�:-"i —� '�.� � ;�' . .. . . r .,' �+�� `� ,��Z,�� -' '" . . . � ,,' ,';; ` ..� 1 � R`'`��4 �` � / '' i S� 1��.\. ' ! � � . ��\\. .� �t�i� r y-'�' ' ,`�►'�, v` �'�'�j� ,��,� ��` ' ► \ �,s� ��\� � ��\,,, � � �� \ ,�.��%..� �```'��•,, � • �r�-� ��' �c•, � ��. �.��,��.;,,. � ►.� ;; �..... '� \. ♦ �ii1�i �''. , , . . � `+i�r�� `%��.�> . .^ �I�:; ""��/,� � ` \ •�"��!t�I► Ii ij/ �"' , ' . . � ,,�,, � .�� „r. �� , , �.. .s!.,�r. ...�/% ./I � �ui_ .. /.I,.�. 1 � / �. /�� -„' "� + ��n'i- ► s .;► ��'%/.I%�i-/- � � . ��+►. /i�/' /�'r ;/,% =///✓�-� - � /_.I _I��''' -'' �!" �� i.'�—,,��,/" �� "� � �' . ��..�'� ��'..r.'/.i%.-/ � �� - - —� �-�_'.%..-�"'%%:ii!�iii �i ~ .� "� �' � ' �/��'/'I,�'''!''"�j�i-i/ � _ �' , ` .-ii �jri/�. s- � . , � • ..% �"%� �./ � . ` ' . ��%/�Yi ,,�,r, .i' i. .� � � e.-iri / , . / . i. �%_� " ;s� . �. . . " . /i i/ !. N`/ ' � . - � /� . �/' ��/ '�-��.�' '� '� / i/ . � � / i. � �' , 1 ,� ; .� ii • / .i� j .- : ;. . . � , ' �. �.,_.. � �/"i i i/i�� :��/ � . � �.� / �/� ,.. � .. . i� . . ./-�•i/.� -:.. . � : ,: i i �, i��l , ��r .,: . . � \� .�.�, ' i i�.i�/�✓�..-.�i. !: �� . �\ \• ��. ... Metrogolitan Airports Commission � �+ . Proposed 1Vo�th �ound.ary Corrid.or Gate_Penetration Analysis Minneapo�is - St. P�ul Internatior�al Airport �' -, , . . �.,, . , , , ,,, ., �, -. � �� '� i� �. PaB� 2 Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs . � C �� C C G �..�- N'; W d � � F— � _J G..,'J 'Q O N -41 Metropolitan Airports Commissiaai ,, �;� . �, . . 1".; ' 1,� ). . ;;�. �� . , , �,� . • � � � � ; � r � � , � . , ' . � � . i� � � ��'� '�' �� 1; 1,1 '/ ' ii 1.' _- -- 53 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE �EFT COUNT=50 (94.3�). RIGNT COUNT=3 (5.7�) • � � ; . . • ; ; ; . . . . ; . • � � ; � � � � � , , , , , e-----�------'----------;o-- �'-------------------�--------- , �-------------------------- • � • � e � ;� � • � � s � i • • � • �� . • . . • 0 0 • i • • i � i N � . 0 O • s s � � m � � i i � .N"A----'P'-"--"-"--'t-----"--"'-"----'-'-'--' . i"""""'"""_ _""'"""'' • �""""'_"""'_"""_'" • e � i 1 O� O i � ' i O � i i """"'_""""""""T"""""""" ' """""�"""""""'"' _""' _"'' � r------------------=--'---- � � 1 ' i . i � i � � � t � � � � i i � � � i i � � � . � � � � � � i � � """'s""""""""".�"""""""""""""i""""__"""""'"""'; """"""""""""" . ' ' ' � i � � � i i ' � � i i � i � ., ! i i �� DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Aviatian Noise Rc 5atellite Prograzns Page 3 ti� v--. w 0 � � � ¢ �_ �s � � Metropolitan Airports Commissiaa T. , �; -� � , . , � ; , . �, � 4183 00. Total 11L and 11I� Carrier Jet I)epartures 499 ... Carrier Jet Dep►artures lla °o) - South of �orridor (�outh �f 29I. I.ocalizer) 499 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE LEFT COUNT=499 (100.0�.) RIGHT COUNT=O (0.0�) ; � ; .; . ' ; , , , , , , i � i � � i � � � � r i ' _""_' _"""" a""""""""'"' �""""""'""_' �""_""""""a."""""' _"""�'""""' ' ' � � _ _""' _. � i � � � i i i � � � � � ' � i � � i � i � � """"""""' L"""_""""".�""""""'"'""J"'""'"""""""!""""""""' _i"""""""""' � � i i � � i � � ' � � � ' � """"""'"�"' � ll."""""" � � � T"' 1"""_""'"""1"""_""__""", , ' r"'_""""�""f""�""'_""_" •: � • • ; ; � � • � � • s ; ; � � .�•� • • � � ! � �i � e :, o ; s ; � � , , � � •----------- � � � -�� -a-rt-+�-�--;----'�------------------------------' --------� e os �e � �i ' � � --------- r----------------- � �o � • ' ; � e♦ a•� • � ; , � � ' s • e � r � i ' a a «P; ° ' � � � � � 1 - --------- �!�-o ---�----------- � ' � ------�------------------�------------------�----------------- � , i�° •� � � / ' � � _�, °r o � ; { •,� �� • • � � e � � , , � � , � � � � � ' �-----------------�----------------- � � , -�-----------------�------------ � � ----- � � � � ; � � ' ' � ; � , � � , � � � � � � �' -------------�------------------; -----------------;----------------- � ; 1 ' . � ; � � � � � ' ' ; � � . ; , , , -4000 -200 DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Aviatian Noise & Satellite Programs Page 5 Metropolitan. Airports cammission . liRinneapolis - St. P�ul In�ernational t�irport _ i�ecexnber 1995 4183 a.. Total 11L and 11R Carrier Jet Departures 3: ...e -Carrier Jet Departures - Early Zlurnout 0.1 %) � (South Side �efore Three 1V.�iles) 3 TRACKS CROSSED P-GATE �, LEFT COl1NT=3 (100.0�} . RIGHT COUNT=O (0.0�) 0 G � � � 0 � .�- � D�VIATION FRQM CENTER OF GATE {ft) Page 6 ' Aviatioa Noise � Satellibe Programs � ( Metropolitan Airports Commission i • � ,� � � �, �' :� .. r , , � � �, . , �,�� ;, . �,� . . ,, , . �. � r�,. . , � � � �� , , , � . . Aviatian Noise & Satellite Pmgrams Page 7 Meaopolitan Airports Commission � � �� l�inneapolis - St. Paui International ..t�.irport _ _ . - .{� December 1995 4183 ... Total 11L and 111� Carrier Jet Departures 89 ... Carrier Jet I)epartures �01:� � 5° South of Corridor (5° South of 29I: Localizer) 89 TRACKS CROSSE� P-GATE � LEFT COUNT=89 (100.0�� RIGNT COUNT=O (O.Q�) 0 � �- � � � � � �-. �-: � -6� OfVIATION FftOM CENTER OF GATE (ft P� 8 Aviation Naise & Satellite Programs n � �r Metropolitan Airports Commissia�n 1Vlinn�apolis - St. i'aul International A�rport 41�3 ... Total 11L ancl 11IZ Ca�r�er Jet Departures 3.... Carrier Jet Departures - Early 7L�urnout .1 %-) - (5outh 5ide Before Three 1Vliles)� 3 TRACKS CROSSEO P-GATE LEFT COUNT=3 (.100.0�) . RIGHT COUNT=O (0.0%) ; ; ; , ; � ; ; ; ; ; � ; ; ��1��.��J�� 1 1 i 1 � , � , � , """"" �"""""'1'0 """""""""""'J""". i � i � i ; ��j�� 1 � � • """"'_""""t' _""'�""""""""" i � � � i � "^""""""""""'r"""""""""""""i"""""""""'_"""'� """ r"""""_"' _""' t ; i � � O � i 1 � t7 � . . � """'"""""' � � � C� """"'T"""""""""""""�""'_"""'_""""""'i""""""""""""" i � CV � ' ; i i � i � � � . � O " j � " � � C> � � "--"'--'----"'-""--".-"' --'-"' --"'---""-"�--' O i i � � i � i � � i i � i i ' ------' ---"--"�"-----"-' -"' -"-"'---' i � . i i � DEVIATION FROM CENTER OF GATE (ft) Aviation Noise & Satellite Programs Page 9 ,, ; � C C�� - �"� � �rx � "s c � ti• - � :?�$ 4'. .i �i':^ �.....r..r....... O 0�0 ��O' .—� � _ 4 �'f��: �;:i: � 7+w"`4 .....:....:.:::�.�... :::.....::::..:ex:in'' .......::.:::::::. � ......: w:. ,5v, •:}::Y-:...�::::: :.: e:.•,. ``•%?..c?:;::�::?:y`,?'•:•:�i,v.'4.•...5 •^.� ..•�. .:.: .. :n ti, +:i?:: i�c'::iS:::>::::::. . .. ""'':ii"'^''>:?>:::;:y`:y ';;•.;•.;•.::.:.:f f:.;' .� :: f: F'�"/ `•; `.`. r: .r:::r:..� :i::5::;:::;:j::..::.:..y.i• .:SSr.�,<,:5::�%: �r::':,:;:5':':.JS:::.'..� . „sx .yMr �$ �,u � '` ` - , ' . �e �::<<r. �z.N:>,.Y.,.x s... : ;.`s's�.�;� ��i�!'n'�-.'%: �•••:`,;;:a: � $ "; s,>`s• <#is=� k , ";ss,.>;; �.;•;;s; .;s�.r a�i�k;s•-;s,' �'s; c ,�x;N%` N��%` r �t� .. . . ��.e �;sx.^r�x$#.,^�",«'.',,: O O O O oo �O � � ; 4'� r-. „� _ . .6l,�Yax.; . ., . � — � � � � �� O . � � � � �• I�I ,—, - � � � � 0 � � � �n � � � � � :� O . �: �; � � v�,� >:?x� c� �.�� <:::}:�� .�� 'x:�� y� .:�� v �?�.., ♦ � � /.�' ::. . ' ti%y�.�� [ti�' � . �{�4iii,mKi{i'.�,1'+. Y: ' . � �.�z `� � '."' ,. ::':?.. �%t'�, ��z. • r...u: K�;;��:�� i L?:;:;z•aw::,,'•,: ..ri. ':�� :.�a.t�:s2 .+' _ f ( ' � ' � yr O 00 �O d' � ;'>:':•.1?€' ;a'�': ::.:r:•: .<�;w> �'`�. :�� `'' : _.. � z I� ,r� •. :� • �v �,;<. ;� }{"' . � ��i�r ,f4 � • • . ,.,, ; � a' � � - __ .1 � � • . � ,• ar , ��J:, � • ::.: � <•;: ''. �>::: N{A •<ti�ti�?,{�i �. - f � �i � {i �fq��y^�.'� . '� . �:i�:2'"�." •: i�:-:•i:•::.. O O !H O 00 . � on x 0 � � � ~ 0 ao � � �. O '� �� R � ;� . . � i' .r - � •1 � � ir � � �■i► � t�� '""'"",..�'� . . I ,� . I � � , v v 0 0 0 0 0o v� .� � � 0 0 0 o � �.. � �i . s � • � � � i� •1 _ • � � � I� � s � � � � � •} � '' ; • _. �'� '� �:: �. z� .,. �t.�s�;> � �� s;.>.:. $:F,?5:' �f5:.`• 'rSi�'"i`.;. �� int��sr: .:::.::::::: • ..:,: ::.::::. . .:::.:...:.... . •...r:..•::.:•. �aa:f;: � ..::::::. .�. ..::.::;.,..:.: .:.. :.:::.;:.:.... �.,:;R�::�:: ': f:::.:: c:::.'.'?'sy�.... •...: . .iF{`,•S�`:•,�ii' i:-N ."::ivi`yii'�' ,y.,. . :::: .. • :::}<'v' E.� ......,......... .............k,... ..:�,:rr,�:::::nr::::::..... ::�.:.::: :...: -::.:>: �::: :........ .....:..:. rx::?:r:i�:i:�:i:iv;<•,-vh b :iii::�i:�ii. ,�r� i � N xr.v�r.v n x�x. n. �..... ir�r.�:.v:rr{�rr:«t;?�{:rr. �.r;.;��iii. �tf . `:.. .t' r.� ,d .: S.;$:: ...?'�'�" s'�S*.'� °i Hr"f'w'�'S �•'n�^'^:v:7.�:�"'v .�..:.:.5. a ;S' � + � • �^S. .::.... � :S'S"'�f:�'.:+n.. 5.�..5'.�l�f>• 'J"` :.�`fS`.'�`..,f�'.f� r,�,.r.y��r+$�y� � ;:; . F�. S �.:.::�::`. .r. �?. ` ..��'�. .�`�`•� � � � 00 .� � 0 b � � � ~ 0 bn �� i a� � '� > 0 0 N� • �:.. � �,�':: �y'.:;, • .:`•y;�..: ...: ••. T'�•::'l.�ii - ' ' i <v ,� ,,,.s;`�......, � � � i • • ; ::. • ...;: .................• .......::. ••?.;:�f:;::;:�:a:-;:o:�;:.::�»:•;:;:•;:;:�:;:�:;:�: . ..................................... i :::.:::::::::::::::.�:::::::..�:::: � w :::::::: ............. . S, ...... ........�::: :•:: ', •:.i:i:::::.�::::::: v.�:::::::.:: ti'•: ::.Jt { : S.'•::Y•. u .?ui � �? .. � � . , ,j t :: ` � . �� , �% i s ;::...:..... ::;: � a � � >'�v a� ....:.:.:..::::::::: :.: :::.::::! ��.�. : .......... . ....... ..... ............................ . ..�.::::: :.:::::.. ................ ....... .. �: :.,::.:::: :... ::::::::::.� ::::::::::::.:: :.:::.::.:::.�:: ::.:: :.:::.:_ :.: :.:::.::.::::::. :::: ................................................................... ,... ::...v.:.....� .....:.:: ::.:....................................................::::: ..,ti�: .,.x;N ....................:......................:.:.. ...........:: :.:....:..:: �.::::. . . . : : : : : : : : : : r . : : : : : :.. :..: : : : : : : : : : : : �., . . . . . . . . . ,: : . : : : : : : : : . . . : . . : : : : . . . : . . . . . . . : : � • � �� < :... ::......... "'� ;i; :;it}i .. :::.....:.: .......: ........................: ... . .... ....... L ::::.:::::::: ......::n�:.:::::::::::::::::..:.. . .. . .... �- � :.: :::v::::::b; � .. ..� :::::::: ::::::.. ' . :n�::::.•:::.::: J :::::::......... �� : � n�''n""attij:'v'.> . . . 0 V „�,..�..�..a..,...:.:::� ::�i::�::sii: • � �er. . . . .> :•::�:::::: .:... � � . . . t :; �� .. . ..... i � ;:#%� ii2i:i;:?;3i?;?i:;:rfi;<i�i#:::>::i;;:i;i3':i;i;�':<=;<i:i� i;r:i::::i:i`;::::::':: ?i'?':ii ::ii:�%2;i:: i`. :'`� � •.:: . 'f'..:: :;i ::i::�:::;�>:i k:::;:;: . . :;:;;Si`G>:::;:::% •i ......:. ..::::::.::.: ::::::•;. �:::::;;•>: �:..:�::� :' :; •V: .;.;;: :.: :w::. �.:: ::•::»:::: ...... �:r .. _.:: . .� :.�• ..:..... .:... . ....: � �� ::. • :.:. • .:::s:::.:..>::^•>::: :>::.. � . :... . .. ...: . . • .:: .., :: �.+ ��`;i�;: it,:� •J:6f:f::t..`::i .:: i.�t;'.. [.'.`.'.':: f...`.�:..'.::...'�.''`.:i:.::•..>:.r.t.:.;;:.'scii:::.'•t?[::;i?if'. ':�:». ;::i:i:i:::::i:;;::;::::ii;{;i:;:`::::::�;:::::::; 5::;;:;:;�;:�:;$:ii%'ioF:i::::::::f;:�:i:+�;::::: :Sr:? :i �`•'i'i: i;: �i�%`�i;�:%2i::::::;`::'?.i;i":i'.'•;i.:':':�i'2;:;;i;`:;:�'i::i::�:;F;i?:;if:;:i;'.`•>;i:}:i.! .•^h. `' � :..::: ::.. . .:: �: ::: �:::,:::::: ::.:.::�:::: •:;: �: �:::::.;:':`.i:: � :::::::..:............. :.: :.: ...::::::::::: :.�::.:.�:.::.:::::::.,. : �: � .. . . ................ :......:..:.... .::::: :.. . ... .. .. . . . :.:.: .. � . ..`:� :::::::::.;.t'<i>ir`i�:[�[�:[I:.�. �':i:::'.: :`.::;:;<•':>::C�"'''4.''%2!:: �::::'.;y:_:iii;::::`:3:::[2'; m :::::::: :..•::.:�.� _. S . :::.: ::.. � :. Y . .. . . : �. �: :.: . :::::.; t . . . . , . : . . :a:•::»:s:>::::: . . :�. :::::::i:;::;::;;'.;?ii . . ;;: � �',� � : , J . � . . � � i:i ' .a �'tpi .�. _ .- . •y •>; .�; . . . : :r: ' �P?sh .........:::c::< _ ' . . . , .........:: : Jr : :: e . :: � tp . � . . . .:: .;> . y ..; :.•:. ... •: � . Qd. .�.::: . ... - . !iY[: :..:.. �:::. ........ :::.:::::.: :::.:::: .. � :. �;::: ^;�:� :.::: :.: : ::.. : .:::.:.:::: \ �: ::::::::;::]:; ...,:.::::: .::� ��:£;::::a ,. � J. ::.:.:.,:.:: � . , . � . � . �. �. :.�...�:::: - ;�::�::::::: . t, ... , . i:�::::;::o:>� :•:- .::::::�• � . ' � - �� :•. ...:...........::.... ........�..:: •.. . .. S"' .S:r >:: ,.....................�r .....::.::: .. .. ...... .. ...... ....................... ..................... :!f.?N•'•'• � �. ��'t:�:?i%:; :�::::;:: :•::::::: 3i.`;:;: i:'•iii;:: �;:`:'::':�::%::�:: i;;i;i:;:'>:::;5:?::i?;::?::iii;� i;;3i;';?:`;:<i�::i? :�:> :•.4... ,....................... ... r.«:.: .::.�::::::.::::::.:..,.:... y: :., ...................... . ' i�.f:::;;:;:;�"�;•`•{';`:;:::�: � i ::r:."::�iii:.:::;i:.ir:;:;� :::::::::::::::::.:::...::::::.:::::::::::: �.::�::::::: •::::::::'?i 2;£`:::;i:ii:i:%;::::�:: i:;::;::?;::;�;;%;::i:::%>:'.::'::;::;:;::::::;::;:?::i:'::r.;:::<:Y.'•f:::.'•;S;;:i � i � 5':: �:`i...aN:..:::`.,`::i."::;'.';`.:5:.� . � �.�.,.yc .�Si � � S. . ....:......... ... . . . ::::::.::::: :.:::. ., . . . . . . . •: -..:::::. �: �::: . . � ,:;:•::::::»;.>::., �. � . . :::::::::::: ::•::: r..3 w A � .:::.:::::. ... . . . p:::•::»:v.o;:;::.; ..S :S'•S:i.=.`-S'l.-::+`.'.`::.^�:'1.".: S:S. ::::. • . . � . � � � ..•.:� ' . . . ..: . .. ....... i :;:::J;:::::::�:':%b::�i::::ii�:';Y: [�:::3Jiii.'G';::k'<%:;:ii%:>::Si::�::: �:if::�:i.�:.%%t+:::t;;;::f� . i.<<.S. �r.....v..-. .::� ...... ................................::::::::::..:.::: .....::::::.�:.�::::::::.:�:::: ........ .•::::.. .. .Y` d...:::...�>f`•.: �..£,: f... . ........... _... . ....... :::::...........................::::: :..:. .`f:�� ._iyw � ...............:.::::::::....... ..... , S•:: S e� .............,:.::::::::::::: :.:: ...............:.. ..S.a..r � � . .:::::::�»>::..,:' . . � ::.�:,:::::::::::: �5 ��ii.r..:"" ...> ..:.:....:...:...:.:::%:%;<`;,'%%`%2C:;`:::::;::::,:.�.:.:....... :::: :•::: ::•::::.: ' 'r:rYfS'S�.S..•;,....; -, :::: :•::::: •: �:::. ....... ......... -:.... . ......:: •:::.�::::. :�::: : . ... , h....n:h,. •.,•: : �»:>'•�::`r. ;.::c;:::.: {::::: r:;;::c:::. �:. �..�::::: :or::;c.;::::o::•::s}r:•o-:::>:<a:::::> - .... �•..:...:.. ...... ..: ... ............ ........... . r y : } mxm�. S :::::::::::::::?i?>:4::::::::iv:::::::::::.�::::::...: .. :.:::............:.............. v� � m ' viirriii � . � �i �::i::i:Gii+:::iii:^'i: ::i:::i�i.`l:?iii}:::�f::(>.ii::v::iiii:::'�' i:S+:i'r'�: i?i:?�i:4i'r': ii5::: :y?:i:?::�. •• 'Yff•�ir.fiLvS -.�: .. . ........ � . -:..... •...: .. ....�. �..F.. � . . .. . . _ .... ....: . �.. .:: �• _ ..� .: 'a�' �G''�xy�>{ �r ,,. /.5....��^i..... S. : :. '^i5„�^',r,".,'.. ... �: .'�F"`..�,`.: � +��.`�'./. ...:G�� i ,' 7�`fC��'.;: � SFS`. `:S: .�;�� t. :: ' f5: _ . .. .. . ...... ..... .. r.5:: ..:` � � �_ � O OC �D .-+ .... � (1. �1 I . � . ( ii � �� , . ,, � . � .�;. �.,�. � � � Submitted by � Dore' Mead On Dece�uber 1 S, Governor Carlson sucprised many of us by announcing that he wants to end the dual- track planning process for MSP International Airport. �ronically, that same day, the 'Utetropolitan Airports � ,bmmission issued for public comment its Draft Environmental Impact Statement (``EIS") for the �rt• Does it make sense to abandon seven years of work that has cost the public seven million dollars - especially when that work is now within seven short months of completion. What's the � sudden rush? Who's been pressuring the Governor to short-circuit the public process that was agreed to yeazs ago? It's tune for us to pressure back: * Call Governor Carlson at 296-3391 to let him know �� t the dual track process .._.�st be completed. * Call State Senator Ted Mondale at 297-8065 to tell him the same. * Call State Represent- ative Dee Long (296-0171) and State Senator Roger Moe (296-257'7) to� them for their support of the dual track process. And remember: Govemor Carlson can change his mind. His change of heart on the transit strike allowed the strike to be settled if he hears from enough people now, I believe he will be responsive again. Jan / Feb 1996 .. �� Neighbors ofAir Base to Receive Compe�tsation. rs Tokyo - Japan must pay $1 M'illion to the neighbors of a U.S. air base in compensation for the annoyance of noisy night flights, a regional court ordered Tuesday. The roar of U.S.military air- craft has long been a sore point in the U.S. miGtary presence on Japan. About 47,000 U.S. troops are stationed t}iere under a mutual defense pact. The Tokyo H'igh Court ruled that 71 residents outside the U.S. naval air station in Atsugi in suburban Tokyo are entitled to damages, although less than the $3.4 million they sought. . . "It is not fair to force a limited number of people, such as residents around the sir base, to sacrifice themseives for a national cause of importance," said I-�iroshi Noda, the presiding judge. STAR TRIBUNE: 12/27/95 ae: ,n n. hti :I' Nokomia ERst Neighborhood Association 'I'own Me�tiag Thursday Feb.1, i996 Minne6aha United Methodist Church Meeting Room. 3701 E. SOth Street 7-9:00 p.m. In addition to regulazly scheduled �usiness, NENA has invited SMAAC and Minnesata Public Lobby to present an sirport sympa ; sium and answer questions about the Dual Track study and MPL's innovative Re- ', mote Runways cancept The � Metropolitan Airports Com- rnission`claims to have stud- ied the idea, but disregarded several key elements (such as available University of Min- nesota owned land in Rose- mount and an existing MSP tenninal) in order to make the idea appear too expen- sive. Under the suggestion of NRP Director Bob Miller, HPDL and other neighbor- hood groups will be invited to the meeting because of their common concerns re- garding the auport. Minnesota Public Lobby is an all volunteer non-profit corporation that has been wofking with SMAAC against airport noise for the con1. pg 2. page 2 NENA Town Meding Thursday Feb. 1 . past four years. SMAAC and MPL aze urging residents to contact their elected officials to demand that the Dual Track Study must not be pre-maturely halted. Govemor Carlson's and Senator Mondale's "bottom line" attitude ignores serious long term inadequacies our pnesent airport location is facing, and throws an ever increasing noise pollution burden on South�Mpls., Inver Grove Heights and Tiae Pr�a►b/em !n C►eveland (ANP, 2 Aug. 1995) A . precedent was established by a federal district court judge � July 1995 who upheld the authority of Braok Park, OH to enact zoning ordinances affecting plans to expand the Cleveland airport. Cleveland has appealed. The Brook Park ordinances cite noise impact as an unportant factor. Cleveland wanted to e�and an elcisting nmway to 10,000ft and build a new 8,SOOft. runway. The federai judge sees no conflict be- tween the federal Noise Control Act which sets per- missible noise levels around air�wrts and the ordinance which sets guide lines for noise in Braok Pazk. We were told at the public rneetu►g an 26 October 1995 other residential commun- ities. In exchange for dropping the Dual Track Study, Senator Mondale promises to spend `�nore than $160 million dollars for noise mitigation through the year 2002.,, His promise sounds drmnatic until compared with the cunent MAC � budget of $195 million for the same p�upose and through the same year. Along with other hollow promises, Senator Mondale proposes an exclusive high speed tcansit corridor connecting downtown by JeffHamiel, MAC Executive Director, that the FAA is very concerned about the ruiing since it re- stricts their authority. The people of Minneapolis s6ould not get their hopes up because the MAC felt certain that the appeal by the city of Cleveland would rescind the ruling. The MAC apparently feels that municipalities should have no say in airport expansion issues. This busi- ness is strictly betweea the airport proprietor (MAC), the FAA and the airlines (Northwest) who know what is best for business. Furthernaore, the Federal Aviation Act gives the FAA responsibility far air traffic control, and any attempt by state or local authorities to regulate aircraft operations is expressly pre-empted. Minneapolis with the airport via Hiawatha Avenue. SMAAC and MPL oppose spending millions to bulldoze the results of the 35 yesr long effort to improve Hiawatha Avenue without destroying the sunounding neighborhoods in order to reduce travel time &om downtown to the airport by a few minutes. Meetings like NENA's � airport symposiuna can serve to educate the public and discourage ambitious golidcians from making Attomeys for the Dept. of Justice, Dept. of Tr�nsporta- tion and the FAA urged the 6th Circuit Court to refrain from any decision regarding Brook Park untit the FAA completes a review of the proposal. The Airports Coun- � cil International - I�orth � America, which fited a brief supporang Cleveland, stated that with respect to munici- palities, "The resuit is a coercive weapon which will allow municipalities around the nation's most significani airports to hold all airport devetopment hostage and thereby gain the control over airport noise that has consis- tently been denied to them by Congess and the court." How terrible! ,, SMAAC � bogus promises in exchange for the right to debate an issue of enormous consequence. Sincerely, Dean Lindberg President, S1bL9AC and' NENA resident. {' In November, 1995, the city of Cleveland urged the 6th. U.S. Circuit Court of Ap- peals to disrniss the Brook Park case and allow Cleve- land to proceed with airport expansion. The issue seems ta revolve around the argu- ment that asserting control over whether or not a runway can be built amounts to control over airspace. Braok Park contends that airport iayout regulations apply only to recipients of federal grants, not to the neighboring jurisdictions on which the airport operators seek to impose its airport. SMAAC i '' r �� i �� pege 3 owerf'ui corporations seeking to secure and expand their position in this marfcet economy make use of wt�ac ever sources are available for help. There are always a group of people who like to ba associated with power because it is useful to them too. Such peopie are called lackeys, minions and toadies. They are concemed with self first and when making pubiic statements are to be �egarded with some skepticism. We have two people who have been so identi�ed with respect to the airport Dual-Track Study and by Hugh K. Shilling �x-chairman of the NiAC. In the Star and Tribune, 31 Dec. 1995, letter to the editor, Mr. Shilling names Govemor Ame Carlson and Senator Ted (Uiondale as acting here more in the interests of the horthwest Airlines monopoly rather than in the interests of the citizens. Mr Shilling was fired from MAC by the Govemor because he thought Mr.Shilling might think that a new airport �rould be best without waiting for the Dual-Track Study completion. Clf course it is ok for Ame Carlson to voice :onclusions on the basis of information fed to him under-the-tabte by MAC. He knows more than we do! He said let's quit the study and get on with expansion of MSP! The Govemor senses rising oppasition to the MAC Draff Environmenta( Impact Study released in December 1995, +vt�ich makes it quite clear that the MAC favors expansion of MSP. In a Star and Tribune article, 16 Dec. 1995, Richard Anderson, Senior VP of Northwest Airlines, was quoted as saying, "!t's a �reat decision for us and we think the Govemor is exactly right ..." Ted Niondale says, "We need to tell the people of South Minneapolis the truth: We do not need a new airport, we can't �fford a new airport and we're not going to build a new airport," even though he oppases ending the Dual-Track Study ahead of schedule. That sounds like it comes from a man who knows what he is talking about; just like Ame Carlson. ''-� ,�� i r i � �� _ Southwest Journal, Dec. 20 - 1pn 9, 1996J :n 11�nneapolis, the airport issue s gettiag attention mainly �ecause the MAC Dual-Track �lanning process is drawing to a :lose, the completion of the �fAC "Draft Environmental mpact Statement" and .tatements &om the Governor vho says let's get on with :xpansion of MSP! What vilt it be? ;ouncil member Lisa Mc )onald (lOth Ward) says that an :uport in Dakota County would �e j itake. Conventian traffic s ceruered in proximity to the drport. It should be kept there. 2uieter Stage III aircraft and �:,�tension of the runway 4/22 are !�e answers to makin�; the skies quieter over South Minneapolis. Counci! Member Steve 11�nn (13th Wazd) agrees with Mc Donald and adds that moving the airport to Dakota County would do irreparabte harm to the M'inneapolis trade area. Such a move would facititate competition from Mall af America and Bloomington with downtown Minneapolis. He added that there needs to be enforcement of nighttime flight restrictions with punitive landing fees for airlines that don't meet the standazds. Council Member Pat Scott (7th Ward) agrees with Minn and McDonald saying she would like additional information on the economic impact of the various options. The city needs assurances from MAC and Northwest regarding Stage III aircraft and funding for home soundproofing, she said. Council Member pore Mead (1 lth Ward) was the only Council Member who supported moving the airport. She said she also remains open to using the remote runways concept. The only option she thought would be impossible is expanding the present airport. Mead said the first decision leading to a conclusion of this debate is for Minnesota to decide if it wants to be a major player in the global marketplace. If "yes" then a much bigger airport witl be required because the current MSP site � would not provide adequate space or capacity. Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton of Iviinneapolis has not ruled out any option including use of remote runways. She is waiting for a report from a task force she appointed to study the problem facing Minneapalis. She expects to make a formal recommendation on the city's behalf early in 1996. 8 G 455 NW `s�yCiaH ��opuaW anan� �iao��in GO L G ao��a�siuivapd �(�!� 6 6 Ilan�� wol � �� : ��,� `<,�r .. �1�� " �� n t, e:s 1�„ � ...rx .S ::v: -" ,St. .C'outa '�a�a. �ka�leaica iaa t (Axr, J�ty s, i�s) t. q c � �'i • :. : • , ; • • ,. . . • . . ' • i . � , Back in July 1995, the St. Louis Airport Authority announced a 20 year, $1.8B expansion plan that ;� - would add a third runway and would require the buy-out of i 500 homes in the city of Bridgeton. The city of St.Louis which owns the airport, though their Mayor says they are truly sorry that as many as 5000 residences will be affected, but that it is in the best u�terests of the city. A class acfron suit has been instigated against the airport by the 1500 residences which seeks damages alleging the buy-out in high-noise areas was just a ruse to expand. Coirtinuing the conuoversy, Bridgetoq with the help of consultants, made a counter proposal to the city in August 1995 costing less than $1B and would result in only 1300 residents exposed to >65dbA noise. The city of St. Louis says this will not alter their preferred plan. SMAAC ENROLI.MENT RENEWAL FORM SEND TO: SMAAC 5116 COLUMBUS SO. MINNEAPOLIS, MN. 55417 �al ($16) Supporting ($25) Contributing ($50) name phone address _ __ _ _ _ city zip _ Please check if you are wiliing to serve on a SMAAC committee Nobe - tfie number aRer your name on arry SMAAC mailing indicates the last year of paid up membership r'" t� .:Y'r� . �r�e■ne��or��r��or��r��a�a��e/dB�B/�i�Y6iitl�$II��0/,�� i � � � I , � V i �./ �J � Special Edition JANUARY 1996 QUARTERLY PROJECT STATUS (end of December 1995) I PROJECT STEPS COR1DI8fCd ACQ11�S�fiM)S comqetea Re►ocanons Vacated Properties Houses Moved Houses Demdished NUMBER OF HOUSES & DUPLEXES 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 �� --.— :. � �►�_r : _ � i:_ . � , This January 1996 issue of the Buyout Update will be a retrospective report of the progress made within each area of the Part t50 Project for the year 1995. , _ The year began with the°January 1995 issue of the Buyout Update reporting 98% completion of all Phase I acquisitions, �� and the Phase II initial interview process wet( underway. The following subsections and charts will review the progress ::-.��;: and report the current status of acquisition, relocation funding, property management, and auctions for 1995. The year end status report (see chart below) will give you the complete acquisition and relocation statistics for Phase I, Phase II, Phase III and all current Phases combined. The graph above shows the major performance categories, with 242 acquisitions completed, which is 70% of the houses and duplexes. - ACOLt_i�TTION AND RFT.�CATION F��x� � - The following Land Acquisition and Retocation Status Report chart, will give you a detailed overview of the progress made on each of the three phases as of 12-31=95. This report indicates the acquisition and relocation tasks completed, . and those remaining elements for Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III yet to be completed. At yea�'•end, 282 or 81% of the house and duplex owners have had initiat phone contact. . . The WDSCO team, each of the title companies, and the appraisers involved in the acquisition and relocation process will continue to work diligently to ensure that each homeowner's and tenant's transition is as smooth as possible. _':�i,�% : � :;.:.`:: t )�:::'::'::. �� .� MSP PART 150 LAND ACQUISITION AND REL.00ATION . YEAR ENQ - STATUS REPORT AS OF 12-31-95 -------__.--�.��. .. �� r� �r,� �r� �ra� �r,� �r,�� r� �r,� �i �� camflm er �:,.', _._---• -�-,��.��'��r�l !. .^C� i"L'..:�'r".LT.'I:i :'.711i;.7',t".�":i��l�t��'��t:�i7��:•''��i��:� Ill _ __..i"'..1 ��L��'� il ��.��'i'�� ass��o��=�i The Part 150 Buyout Update is a newsletter by the Metropolitan Airports Commission and W.D. Schock Company, Inc., containing information on the MSP Land Acquisition and Relocation Projects. ' Funding Review: During 1995 the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) allocated funding on April 13, in the amount of $8,320,000.00 with matching funds provided by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) for a totai of $10.4 miltion�do(lars. These funds aliowed MAC and WDSCO to begin Phase III, acquiring properties within Priorities (11) through (15), and approved hardships. The iust project funding was approved on September 23, 1993, which provided the authorization to begia the Airport Improvement Program (Aip) currently underway in NFT/RA. To date, $33.2 mitlion has been provided by the FAA and MAC on an 80/20% share, respectively. . • • � � Y 1l : ► o U,1 ►il: '1► : ��. � . � `-- • --=- Vandalism: T'he Mazch 1995 issue of the Buyout Update, first addressed the problem of vandalism and theft to vacant homes in the neighborhood. Throughout the entire yeaz, this serious prob(em has increased. MAC, WDSCO, and the City of Richfield Police will continue to work to resolve this problem, but continued invo(vement and vigilance a�e stilt needed from at( homeowners and tenants remaining in the neighborhood to report any acts of vandalism or theft. If a homeowner or tenant should see anything suspicious or a d'uect act of vanda(ism or theft, we ask that you ca11911 immediately. We hope 1996 wilt see an end to this problem. ' Vacating Procedures and Maintenance of Properties: The WDSCO Properiy Management team has worked closely with the firm of Pham Express throughout the yeaz of 1995. The team has created vacating procedures for each homeowner and tenant to foltow to ensure ease in the move to a new replacement home. Once the walkthrough inspect{on has been comp(eted and the keys have beea iurned over to WDSCO, the vacant home and lot are maintained in a professional manner until the home is aucrioned or, as a last resort, demolished. As of December 31, 1995, there were 219 vacant properties from Phase I, Phase II and Phase III. Of the 219 vacant houses, 91 so(d at auction and were removed. In addition, 91 houses have been demolished. Of the 91 demolished houses 25 were demolished the week of December 25, 1995 and completed the first part of January 1996, with an additional six (6) scheduled for demolition the week of 2/5/96. With 182 houses removed from the project area, the team will concentrate on maintenance on the remaining area, as additional houses are vacated. MAC and WDSCO wou(d like to extend a sincere "Thank You" to all homeowners and tenants for their patience and understanding during the lengthy process of moving houses and demolition of houses in a neighborhood where they still � reside. Every effort is made by both housemovers and demolition contractors, to maintain safety measures and prevent damage to any occupied properties. If you have any questions or concerns regarding probtems you are having or may have with the housemovers or the demolition cantractors please call the WDSCO office. Auction Review: MAC, WDSCO, and Kloster Auctioneers conducted two pubtic suctions in 1995. These auctions were conducted on March 3, 1995, and August 30, 1995. The auction held on August 30, 1995, which was the fourth suction to date, was the first in which 100 % of the homes � were sold. This fourth auction also produced the highest avecage purchase price of all four aucrions combined. To date, the project has generated sales revenue of $588,842.00 from the four auctions conducted so far. �All monies generated from these auctions go back into the fundin$ for the Part 150 Land Acquisition and Retocation Program. The auctions have been successful in creating additional funds for the buyout area, while reducing property management fees:and demolition costs. SWAT Team Request: In December 1995 the MAC received a request to provide a vacated house in the project for use by the Aicport Police, FBI and City of Richfietd Potice, for use in practice SWAT team exercises. MAC and WDSCO are searching for a location that wiil be isolated from the remaining community of occupied residence. If the request is approved, details will be provided in the next issue of the Buyout Update. I, W. D SCHOCK COMPANY, INC . � 5844 28TH AVF.�1iTE SO[T2'H . ,= _ . � : -�-��:' ,''--:�' - --, I�lp��:vEAPOLIS �F,,o''�;;,, �=,�'� �.. ;::..,: . MN 55417 `-: f��`� `'�;,., ,��;;,:�•�:�ii':�n��l'.j: (612) 724-8898 '- ' �aN--�•a5`�—;":.,% !. ` us ,; +I ,� U !* (800) 260-7062 � %�R,=�� ' .� � —�� `,� •:,, ...M�\/''°:.:.�� . _..--- -----'• Tom Lawe11 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Hghts, l�t 55118 ' :?trr: • � � TO: Inte�ested Parties FROM: Nigel Finney, IVletropolitan Airports Commission Natalio Diaz, 11Aetropolitan Councii RE: METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION - METROPO�ITAN COUNCIL BRIEFING - PUBUC COMMENT AND INPUT DATE: February 7, 1996 The Metropolitan Airports Commission and Metropolitan Councii have scheduled a joint briefing session regarding the Dual Track Airport Planning Process on February 15, 1996. Part of this briefing session includes the opportunity for public comment related to the development of future commercial aviation facilities to serve the Twin Cities and State of Minnesota. The two primary alternatives being considered by the Metropolitan Airpo�ts Commission and Metropolitan Council are continued development of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport or development of a new airport. The MAC is currently scheduled to discuss the matter on March 13, 1996, and the Metropolitan Council wiii discuss the matter on March 14, 1996. � The February 15 meeting will heid at the Thunderbird Hotel (I-494 and; 24th Avenue in Bloomington) in the Cherokee Room. Public input and comment will begin at 7:00 p.m. Those wishing to speak will have the opportunity to sign up on the evening of the meeting. C February 12, 1996 TO: Airport Relations Commission , FROMo Kevin Batchelder, Interim City A ministrator SUBJECT: Discuss Mendota Heights Air Noise Plan of Action ��17��'��P�l At the January meeting, the Commission tabled discussion on the Mendota Heights Air Noise Plan of Actian in order to allow time for Commission members to ' � review and create a list of revisions or deletions. . I have attached a copy of the Mendota Heights Air Noise Plan of Action document and a topic list which was generated in August by the Northern Dakota County Airport Relations Commission. � . The Commission should update the existing Mendota Heights Airport Noise Plan of Action: . � � C C �� MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT i TOPICS OF INTEREST 1. Phase-Out of Noisy Stage II Aircraft. 2. Nighttime Restrictions on Aircraft Operations. 3. Composition of MAC Body - Accountability Issues. 4. MSP Long-Term Comprehensive Planning Issues - Expansion of Existing Airport. , 5. Dual Track Airport Relocation to Hastings Site. 6. Remote Runway Development Option. 7. FAA Airspace Usage Study. . S. FAA "Close-In" vs. "Distant" Departure Procedures. 9. Corridor Definition/Compliance Issues. 10. Non-Simultaneous Departure Procedures. 11. Runway 4-22 Extension Issue - Mediation Underway. 12. Metropolitan Council "Noise Zone Map" Update and Related Land Use Controls. " ! . � 13. Noise Measuremenfi Issues - Usefulness of Ldn65 Contour. 14. Equity of Current Runway Use System. 15. Sound Insulation of Air Noise Impacted Homes - FAA Part 150 Program. 16. Sound Insulafiion of Air Noise Impacted Schools - St. Thamas and Visitation. � 17. �� Expansion of MAC Aircraft Noise Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS) 18. Aircraft Ground Noise During Periods of Departure Over Minneapolis. 19. Aircraft Engine Run-up Noise. 20. Global Positioning Satellite Technology - Implement 1995-96. � ' 1� ' � ` 1 ; � ; . 1 � 1 e Noise Reduction Through IUlodified Takeoff Procedures , -, -, ., -,-•,---.- � .; . ;�I '. '; � i � '' I • I . 1 ;� 1 1' � ' I ' 2. Heighten Avuareness of' MH Air Noise Concerns a) Distribution of Refrigerator IV�agnets b) Expanded Mailing Lest of ARC Agenda c) Appoi�tment of City Resident to the IVIAC K' � �' • � ; � • ' • • "' , , a) Prevent Cor�struction of Third North Parallel Runway a 4o Conversoon to Stage 111 Quseter Aircraft' �leet a) Assure Convers�on by the Year Z000 5. Noise Reduction Through Litigation a) Possibae Lega6 Challenge? 6. Noise Mitigation Through Sound Insulation a) Assure School Sound Insulataon ._ . .. _ ._ _ ii � i. � • , • � . ,.. "_ � � � � .. � `' • ;.�; � .. • . • 1�.._ �� ' �� - . _ ,' � i� � • • � ; ) J `. C � ' � � � ; , ; � ' � A) Actio�. Plari Developxnent Process , B) List of Possible Topics of Consideration C) Action Plan Elements: . 1. Noise Red.uction 'Through Modified Takeoff Proced.ures a) Implementat�on of Non-Simultaneous Ta.keoff Proced.ures Which M'�rumize Mendota Heights Air Noise Exposure b) Adoption of "Close-In" vs., "Distant" 'Takeoff Procedures to Red.uce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights c) Adoption of Man.datory Nighttime Takeoff Regulations to 1Zed.uce Noise Generation Over 1Vlendota Heights Page 2 i 3. 4. � ' ' � � ' ��,: , ' , . . � °�. , , i ' ' .� -� . , -i. • _i�� , •c • � - r � . --i a) Pr,oduce and Distribute �formative Refrigerator Magnets Ac�vea tising the M.A�C Noise Complaint Line � �b) Expand I�istribution of Air Noise Related Information c) Appointment of City Resident to the Metropolitan Airports Commission � ' �� - i� r�� .�_� . ,� a) Prevent Constr�ction of Third North Parallel Run.way ' Convexsio�. to Stage III Quieter A,ircraft a) Assure Conversion by Federal �7eadline of Year 2000 . � . � , ' � ; ., �-: • �� , � �, ;.�; 5. Noise Reduction 1'hrough Litigation a) Determi�e Feasibility of a L,ega1 Challenge to - C'.urrent Air Noise Distribution 6. .Air Noise Mitigation Througl� Sotand Inssul.ation a) Assure Installation of Sound I��sulation in Schools Affected by Air Noise Exposure , � �� C� . � . .� � � . ,' � ; � �- - - - �-- - A,.c�ion lan evel�p ent Proces� ; . � i_ . , ,. ; � � : * Identify Focus Issue i, � i; � � * Identify Specific Goa1 � � �{:� - * List What Need.s To Be Done - Action Steps :_,. , .., * Identify �JVho V�Till �Vork On Each Step � � .� * Determin.e When Each Step Is To Be Done �� .� ; ..1I i' !� �'� 0 0 C� �� . , � ,. � � � . . � . Issue: Noise Red.uction 'Through 1V�iod.ified. Takeoff ]Proced.ures � , , � , - � � - � . � � � - _ � �_ . _�:�. _ '_ . . :�: - . : : ._ ,_ - � : : � : � - � : : - ` i � ' � r� -��• . - •� • • •�• A�tion Steps: " t � (�,,,� . ��:: � . . 1. I2eview previous NZAC ,- ; representations on issue f _; . .-.with City Council � f�• � i ; Draft lettex to MAC requesting update on revised non-sim.ultaneous takeoff proced.u.res - invite Mr. Hamiel to upcoming ARC meeting u .�� Staff/ARC �� . June 16, 1994 ,., �-r-r� �� •� �• , � � � � �•� .�� •� . - i�-,i � .r r .��• ,� � �� .11_� , �� . � � .� � - �1 �� L�� rY��c� �n ��- tze�� --�, �,� �..�c��v ✓ " 0 Issue: . , � . � � � � ,� � Noise R.ed.uction 'Through Modified. Takeoff Procedures � V Go�.: A.doption of "Close-In" vs. '°I;istant" Ta.keoi�' Procedures � to Reduce Noise Generation Over Mendota Heights �� Action Steps: � F::. � 1 o Review FAA Requirements ' " Wli�l �1�7 �OU11C11 Continue Participation on MASAC Operatioms Conamittee which is currently reviewing . issue �� "� June 16, 1994 Staff/Council On going IVIASAC Operations Committee MASAC reports to full MASAC -+-�� -�e�c, � �a �-� ��es�-, �v mo.�-K�..� �c� p-�'c`� c:c S t�'1 Cl 1�...Q. MASAC reports recommendation� S�� d MASAC to MA.0 Planning and Environm.ent Comrruttee �� :�._,�--� 5. MAC Planning and Environment reports recommendation to MAC �� : �'�� 6. � �� MAC recommends to F�A procedure be tested ��:�� Page 7 ��-� � �5� -� � MAC July 1994? Aug. 1994? Sept. 1994? Sept. 1994? C � �� Issue: Noise Reduction Tbrough Modi�.ed �'a.keoff ]Proced.ures ,� Goa1: Adoptio� of "C1ose-In" vs. "]Distant" �'a.keoff Procedures _ io Reduce Noise Generation i�ver Mendota Heights Action Steps: , � ?�� 7. �A1� designs flight procedure � _.� be tested. '' 8. FAA. begins flight test ,, � �i . �lo.�C� cj.�.,c.., � 1�.�..� c� ' -�-��- ��Q..�..�..Q..� �--� ;� - r�'c�.�- � c.�.�.�,.� � a...-�-_ i > I'age 8 �� •. • �, 1.� � �- Issixe: . � . i � � . < �, Noise Red.uction Through Mod.ified. Takeoff Procedures �. � �� • .��. • •� ��- .,-• �-• . ,� • '-, • -�- . �, � -��. . - .�: ; Action Steps: �-1� ; Review previous 1VIA,C �� • re resentations on �ssue P r ; Wl�l Cl�i COUriCll ; . �.. � 2. � �_: � � ��. l__: r, .• . 1�. � - r Res.earch nightti�ne f�ighi Staff/ARC Sept. 1994 restrictions imposeci at otlier � U.S. a1Ip01"�S pc� ir�C��ep�.r�d- ��-�',�,�..C�Y'C4'� Depending upon fimdings, prepare request to NZA.0 for adoption of more stringent requirements �M�- �1-�°�- � � ��o' L°`� ��-�-� ` C,o�-�.-�- �1C��.. �--v �c� c�� , ,_, .. C�`�� o,��-p��+- ��i C�t c��15 #�� P�--��-�-Yu� ��-��- pa�� _, Oct.-Nov. 1994 � s r� �nl i ct �+- l�.e wc�r�� -1 � p�,�, sv� V ol � s cv� . G� n-�- c(� ._ �o_ ,�.,�., �.��..,�5 ��e�� ..� �.e,�-, r1 � c�- h c��5 ''i i.s2-0.1a-k,.., lJ�-�'� dilk v CU��YI C�. � I�GIG� iO ��Gl�. C��--Q-'i�� `pU S h i, nc+�-s�rc-�uJ, , pc�.,�'n j U:�i�.r1�.�en pc�ss�b1e_. . 1 � v� w� �°`�Y`.�-�.--� ��.S�-e�oa,e..' �' 3 C�..�v`e.,v�c�...,�..�- cr��'�- �� ,,,�.,�c�-- rl la� a 9(no t,� S � ,,� � �-�-� g C� Issue: ' 1 ' � � ; i ' i.: �Ieighten Awareness of Mendota� Heights Air Noise Concer.ns � Goa1: Pxoduce and Distri ' bute Inform.at�ve Refr�gerator Magnets �� Advertising th.e MAC Air Noise Complaint Line. �, .. , � Action Ste s: �o P When C.: `�s. In.vestigate costs of magnet production and distribution Commission to review design Oxder delivered. to City Ha11 M,agnets distributed. to Council and Airport IZelations Co�mn�.ssion Commission to review final letter and news release Magnets d.istributed. to residents . Siaff May 1994 r-•i�� i �_ ; '••� Staff �une 16, 1994 . � Commission July 13, 1994 Staff Ju1y 29, 1994 , �� 7. Add.itional magnets available at Staff ��a�� Until Gone � �_� City Ha11 upon request ,�, , ak ° �`'`� �� ,� , ; . ��' � � ��5 �� ' �SU - Cc�,��.s c�� c� oC'J�- i'1�u-� (� �� '� . i� . �° � � � I _.. - 1N o�n�" t��a..c� co�- c�� c�.�.-� o� � , ; Page 10 0�� i : _ _ (� C�.� o�,- _ E�[.(� . 0��-- nr`.e.�1 c�i I 5� - C�w�_ � c�.c�., v W ho�- �1-�G d��naj m� � ssvre S, u�1h� p�c�2S CIo a��I'�� i �o. i��.P� �o-do�-� -��- G � , .� � -��., r��, ��, �n � ,��) 1 � ; ; �o � 0�. �p � �9-�C1�r ii�� -2S�"i � t � � �-. �, L� C=�i �► �-�- �� k�--1 � �,-2�" � i �?,�,- � a,�n -I-- t� ��.,��f-' �_ _�,�- i-�-��5 � � G�-e� � 5 a`~�- :� �-J — �u�--� � �ac.k..� 0.� iX1 �Cl�rYl+ �(1C� 11�L�� J �` � . � ` � ' � ' �� Issue: I3eighten Awarea�ess of Mendota Heights A.ir Noise Concerns �Cpoal: E�a.�.d ]Distr�.b�tion of �r Noise Re�aied. �o�ation � �� A�t�on Ste s : � p _ W110 When � ��-1 i.� 1.� Expand mailing list for AR.0 agenda to include State Senators and Reps. , ��: � 4. \' Mail letters to State Senators and Representat�ves �troducing ARC `K�p �..r�,�jor rn�.� �` . In.vite guests to montbl.y .ARC �eetings (ie., Mr. Hamiel, Mr. Wagoner, State elected officials) sr.�- pe,ncr�.�c�-Q..�-� - onc� �.. c�,v�cc�.�Lt�. Staff Aug. 1994 Staff. On going Expand coverage of a.ir noise issues ' Staff in City newsletter - mat� �.. ci-�v�-�- V�, � l-e pc�o�.. � r� n�e,u}sl-e_-�-�-e�' . . • •, ; 5. Continue d.istribution of refrigerator Staff On going {. magnets advertising 1VIAC a.ir noise com la.int line ��'`�'��' �S �� a� � P - �,n. ��1 � 1� �- �c.� �.�--�.c,� �._.Q.�� t.�..�.�o.s�..� --t� �, . �-�...e,,r�-�, �: �--- ,��-f' �-�--n�� . . �� - I�-e�--�e.�' -�c� �.�,tv �" Page 11 ,�`� � .��' �� _ ��--�' ��^� - Q��r�r�- �1�.- rn i� r c,c�i�r� � t 1 Gc� �� .��,� �mSP e��n . �-b� r�-� �- ►��-= i rae� ��s�- `�' P� �c��`� :� �� I�sue: � Goal: �� . ;� . � � � . � I3eighte� Awareness of Mendota Heights A.ir Noise Concerms ' �� i��-i • .. �-� • i- �� .� � �•; �r�r� �� Action Steps: �� Review current distributi � of � MAC Commissioners with A.RC 2� Prepare letter to gubernatorial candidates asking for thei� pos�tion on MSP expansion, corridor use, MAC representation (� �. '__! 3� Discuss City concerns with our ;._. current MAC representative l�' 4� Monitor gubernatorial election l�� this fa11 � .._: Who Staff � Staif .• � Staff When Sept. 1994 Oct. 1994 'Nov. 1994 5. Discuss concerns witil State S�aff/AR.0 Senators and Reps o rega.rding composition of MAC -- c...��'�-I-� �� u-� �. �.�rn me.r s � ��— - �- U � c�,�. �>k.r�-�-. � �'�� C: - C�� 6. Draft legislation to amend Staff � b f " num er o commissioners an.d districts bou�daries represented Page 12 . � �• �! ��c� �no �, . Ja�.. 1995 ��,e�� -� c,�. C�sr�pY �r �o��-- Cc�c.�J� � �v1�4c ��.pS � �i ��.aA��sz..c�.� a'�rsu(' �F'�C. � \�-�-R- ��'--��'t.s�... �'..�' `.u-'�.Q'e.�-�I �;,e�.- � ��,� o.� �..;��s��-f� c..�-�'w� c� b� � I fi� �..,��-�1 � � �� C �� : ;_.; Issuea � � • � � � , � � , �� - �i •�e� -�-� ' .r r� Go�: � P�even� �onstruc�ion of �ird l�Tort� Para.�e� 12unway l..; i. j • `. "' : _ ActiOn StepS: - . Wh0 When � 1. U da ' ' p te Com�ussion on status � Staff Aug. 1994 of MSP � LTCP stud � r d�� q��, �� _� . Y ada � ,�-�-��x-� �`�' �,�." ' N v�V Co e'1 e�:.p-1�- l.P A' �,�,Q,n c,es,� . 3 r`� p c�...��v� � �2. . Continue pariicipation on MSP Staff '� �� Om-going Tech�nical Workin C ' � g ommittee �- �.�� . � � .,,,�-� � , -� �� ) , . . y,� ,, . .1. �, ,, �'� '�'' ' I . ,, ' ' 1� .1 � �• �. ��:•� Retain experts to assist i�n efforts Coiuicil to prevent the designation of the tl�ird no�i . parallel runway as the preferred. MSP expansion alternative Sept. 1994 / As Need.ed. 5. Respond to public comment Council/ Dec. 1994 � request on Final Alterriative ARC � ;� . Environmental Docum.ent for MSP � ��; � - ��-� � ss�..e ��.r� c�o� c�.,�l � ��, � �--- 1 7 , . (�� dc� mc��Pi ' �� C� - � vv hc�' C�.� � . d� -�' s�'°� -�'� ; �''OG��. �1 ��-s�- �% �� . Page 13 � � �o��'..�t�.G�C' � -�� 5�� `�� -K�,-Ta.�-� °��..,�n �1 ��--� �� o �� -,n � .-ISsu�: � ,� • �'� ;; � � '' Conversion to Stage III �uieter A.ircraft �� Goa1: Assure Conversion by Federal Deadline of Year 2000 Action Steps: Who When .1-. - Review I�f WA obligations io , f� MAC re�arding Sta.ge II phaseout ��,,� and research fleet n�ix at various � a.irports around the country �� 2. Prepare letter to l�S.AC regarding � ongoing contraci ialks with I�f WA ; to requesi inclusion of language � � specifying phase out date ��j� 3. Work with MAC commissioners who are supportive of effort to help build consensus amongst MAC 4. I,etter to I�fVVA asking for their cooperation. in. committing to Year 2000 phaseout. 5. Prepare media news releases a.n.d information letters explaining issue and asking for letters a.n.d/or calls to MAC in support of contractual language Page 14 n Staff/ARC � Staff/ARC Staff Staff Aug. 1994 Aug. 1994 Sept. 1994 , Sept. 1994 Sept. 1994 . ,� • .� � , � . � �::�::, .._ Is�u�: Noise Red.uction Through Litigation CToal: Dete ° e Feasibility of a Lega1 Challenge to C�ent A.ir _ I�To1Se I��st�b�.�lon Action Steps: Who When � ; Review history of lega.l � challeng�s related. to air noise In.vestigate FA.A proced.ures in. ' Staff n. effect at time of 1973 corridor decision - Freed.om of Inforn�ation Act request? e • r� . � r • � - ;� - - � - r r � '` ,' .�� - ��i-i�. �� • �r. . -r Counc�.1 considers recommendation .Council and determines desi�ed. course of action Page 15 � _ ••, ,- •• ••� . . a• C C �_ . ;� . s � � . � , ' � . . ,�� • �r '� . •� r ��• '.::.- -_�. :� . `_:: �: - �� . •• ' � •. �� • •'� a �r � . �t Action Steps: 1. 1Vleet with school admi�i.strators to � � discuss need. 2. Analyze MAC School Noise Monitoring Study 3. Work wit11 schools to to prepare funding request for insulation 4. Approval of funding request %r subr�ittal to MAC �• Staff Staff/.AR.0 Council Page 16 �-� . � • •, Jan. 1995 Mar. 1995 Apri1 1995 I - � 1 J 1 • C1' : February 12, 1996 To: Airport Relations Commission ,i/ . From: Kevin Batchelder, Interim City Admini taa�� Subject: Dua1 Track - Response to Draft Environmental Impact Statement DISCUSSION Based on input from the Airport Relations Commission over the last several months, the City Council considered the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and draited their response at their February 6, 1996 meeting. (Please see attached letter from the Mayor to the Metropolitan Airports Commission.) This letter was submitted to the MAC on February 13, 1996 which was the deadli.ne for public comment on the DEIS. Although the deadline for the comment period has passed the Airport Relations Commission should discass the City's response. In additi.on to the letter of response, the City Council went on record in support of continuing the Dua1 Tra,ck Planning Study, as originally intended with legislative consideration in 1997. A press release was sent out announcing this position by City Council and coverage was extensive including the SouthWest Review, the Pioneer Press and Minnesota Public Radio. (See attached press release.) � f Also attached are newsletters from the Association for Sensible Airport Planning, who are opposed to a new aitport. Discuss the Dual Track Auport Planning Study and provide sta:ff with any direction. -:� - � ► � , � � � February 12, 1996 Metropolitaa Airports Commission c/o Ms. Jean Unruh 6040 - 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55450 . RE: Comments on the Dual Track Airport Planning Process Ihaft Environmental Impact Statement Dear Commission Members: This letter is to serve as the City of Mendota. Heights comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Duat Track Airport Planning process and is also to serc,e ,to express our concerns about the Dua1 Track Airport Study. ' r�� :a i� • i:� r �� :� �:a � The City of Mendota Heights offers the following comments to the published Draft Euvironmental Impact Sta.tement: � . 1. The DEIS does not identify, or examine, all the true costs and benefits f�ir either airport track that has been studied. In addition, the DE�S la.cks a true cost comparison or impact analysis for all possible options that could be undertaken, or #hat are curnently being considered, including Northwest Airlines Concept 6A and the Rosemount Option supported by the Minnesota Public Lobby. �.: 2. The DEIS does not quantify the benefits from the potential redevelopment of the elcisting MSP site if the airport were to be relocated to Dakota �County. An anatysis has not been completed that examines the economic benefits and the talc base impacts that would accrue due to the redevelopment of the MSP site. 3. The DEIS analysis of the external costs on the commuaities that currently surround MSP, due to the impact of inc�eased noise pollution caused by expanding the curnent airport, are ina.dequate. The amount of money estimated for noise mitigation is based upon the existi.ng Part 150 program and is grossly inadequate under a scenario of an expanded MSP. The DEIS assumes that the e�cisting home insula.tion, prog�ram is adequate to alleviate the noise pollution problem and the estimates for noise mitigation costs are based upon the current home insulati.on program and the amount of money �. 1101 Victoria Curve • 1Viendota Heights, 1ViN • 55118 452 • 1850 Metropolitan A.irPorts Commission February 12, 1996 Page two currently available for this Part 150 pmgram. The DEIS sta.tes this is adequate to allevia.te the noise pollution pmblem. There is no substantiation for this clai.m, nor does the DEIS adequately address this issue. No other noise mitigation efforts are incladed in the D�S analysis, ouiside the noise insulati.on program. �or the DEIS to be a credible document, further neview is necessary to adequately analyze the external costs of aoise pollution on communities surrounding an expanded MSP, to identify noise mitigation efforts other than sound insulation and to analyze the costs and benefits of these other noise mitigation efforts. 4. The DEIS does not address the impact from noise pollution on housing values for communifies surnounding MSP under a scenario of an expanded airport. For the DEIS to remain a credible document, the costs of housing value depreciation must be included in the review of impacts for an expandad MSP. The costs of community sta.bilization and economic revitalization should be included in the DEIS, for both tracks of the study. The costs of properiy value guarantee programs, tax credits for housing revitalization programs and other community stabilization programs should be included in the DEIS. • 5. The DEIS does not adequately address, or identify, the area. to be included for sound insulation purposes, or for other noise mitiga.tion efforts, as mentioned above. Therefore, the costs for this program are again gmssly undereslimated. Further review is necessary. �. 6. The DEIS assumptions for the growth in operations are inadequate and do not equate with current, real growth rates in operations. Further review is necessary to adequa.tely determine if an expanded MSP wi11. reach capacity before the end of the current study ti.me line in the year 2020. Should aa expanded MSP reach capaciry before the year 2020, additional runways may be necessary. The DEIS has not addressed future additional runways at an expanded MSP and their potential. impacts in terms of noise exposure and environmental impacts, community disruption, economic development and/or decline and ta.1c base impacts. This is a serious flaw in the DEIS, based on an assumption that this impact will occur after the time line assumed for the study. Further review is needed. 7. The DEIS underestimates the induced development benefits for a reloca.ted airport and the economic benefits that would accrue to Dakota County. Metropolitan A,irports Commission February 12, 1996 Page three 8. The DEIS does not adequately address the costs and benefits of regulating air noise generation and eacposure. If MSP is to continue to exist its present location, it is essential that "teeth" also be put into the regulations affection the operation of the airport. The DEIS assumes that current operati.onal procedures will remain in place with an expanded M5P. There is no analysis to substantiate the costs and benefits of this assumption. Long term community compatibility with MSP has not been fully analyzed in the context of operational changes that could more equitably distribute air noise generation. The following operational considerations should be included in the cost and benefit analysis of the DEIS: a. The aircra.ft departure corridor should be narrowed over Mendota. Heights and Ea.ga.n to take full advantage of the latest air traffic control technology. The introduction of a Global Positioning Satellite navigation system at MSP should greatly impmve the safety of airspace management, and will also lessen the distance aucraft need to be separated from one another to ensure passenger safety. Other precision air traffic control advancements on the horizon will only help the MAC and FAA better utilize the airspace surrounding MSR to minimi�.� � noise impacts over residential areas. b) The inequitable reliance on the Mendota HeightsJPagan comdor should be ( eliminated. The capacity of the comdor is finite, and communities overflown by aircr�ft using the comdor ougbt not be expected to endure air noise exposure beyond a fair limit. All communities surnounding MSP receive signif'icant economic benefit f.rom its close pmximity. Similarly, all should be expected to bear a reasonable and equitable share of the associated noise burden as well. c) Over the Mendota Heights/Fagan ama, departing aircraft should be directed to utilize, to the fullest extent possible, less noise sensitive area.s, such as industrial pazk property and highway rights of way. These areas ha.ve been planned in conformance with existing and approved airport runway configurations, are in conformance with Metropolitan Council guideli.nes, and have been approved by the Metropolitan Council. To fully accomplish this goa1, aircraft during non- busy hours should' be directed to fiy a crossing pattern in the corridor, rather than being given depariure headings which overfly close-in residential areas. This crossing procedure daring non-busy times has been approved by the Metmpolitan Airports Commission and is cunently awaiting implementation by the Federal Aviation Administration. d) Once modi.fied to take advantage of the ]atest air traffic control technology and adjusted to correct for air noise distribution inequities, the bo�tndaries of the aircraft depariure and arrival comdors should be specifically defined, and air Metropalitan Airports Commission February 12, 1996 Page four noise exposure standards should be established along this comdor. Aircraft operators violating these standards should be subject to substantial monetary fines. e) Nightt'rme aircraft restrictions should be put into place immediately to ensure that only Sta.ge III, quieter aircraft are flown between the hours of 10:30 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. Such restrictions should be mandatory and violation of the standards should result in a mrinetary fiae to the offending a.ir carrier. fj Noise Abatement Departl�re Procedures (related to how quickly aircraft gai.n aititude upon departure) should be reviewed and adjusted to ensure that the full � performance capabilities of all air�craft are being utilized. The ability of aircraft to rapidly gain altitude, thereby minimizing aircraft noise levels experienced on the ground, should be quantified and made part of air tcaffic d�parture procedures at MSP. This is especially true for Stage III aircraft. g) In its MSP Comprehensive Plan, the MAC has identified a future runway construction project located on the west side of the airport pmperty. This new North/South runway, if built, is e�cpected to accommodate air iraffic needs well beyond 2020. The face of aviation will be considerably different by that ti.me aad will hopefully include later generation aircraft wluch will be substantially quieter than the curnent Stage III quiet aircraft, and high precision,air traffic control technology which will ensure safe airspace management with a minimum of aircraft separation. With this in mind, the MAC shQuld commit that any airport expansion identified in subsequeut MSP Comprehensive Plans will be "noise-neutral", meaning that no new noise impacts over residential areas will be generated off of the airport property as a result of the future addition of new runways. h) Also related to the 1V%SP Comprehensive Plan, the MAC should establish measurable criteria. by which the performance of MSP is to be judged in deciding whether or not airport expansion is warra.nted, These performance criteria should be frequently and regularly reported to allaw interested parties to monitor the need to undertake the improvements described in the Comprehensive Plan. • '' ` 1' � i M I N �'r! The City of Mendota Heights is concerned with the recent appearance of the Northwest Airrlines Concept Plan 6A and the likelihood that it will receive consideratio�i from the decision (_! makers on the Metropolitan Airports Commission and at the Legislature. This plan has not Metropolitan Airports Commission February 12, 1996 Page five been included in the review for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. If NWA Concept 6A plan is to be considered, it will be necessary for the Metropolitan AirPorts Commission to re-open the Environmental Impact Statement study to inclade this plan in all phases of impact analysis. As stated above, the DEIS fails to address any impacts for additional runways beyond the year 2020, or before the year 2020 if the gmwth projections are discovered to be underestimated. 1'he Northwest Airlines Concept 6A includes a projected north parall.el runway. The DEIS fails to address any'potential impacts that a north parallel runway would have including comnauaity disruption, declines in property tax base values, noise pollution and other environmental impacts that would occur under the Northwest Airli.nes Concept 6A. The City Council of Mendota �Ieights disagrees with the Metropolitaa Airports Commission's decision to speed up the Dual Track Study Process to report to the Legislature in Mazch of 1996. The public comment period for the DEIS concludes on February 13, 1996. The Metropolitan Airports Commission will need more than one month to adequately address each communities comments and to address all the areas where the DEIS may be inadequate or in need of further review. Mendota Heights supports the original schedule, as prescribed in current state law, for the completion of the Dua1 Track Airports Study. : � . We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement. We ea.gerly await your reply and response to our comments and concerns. Sincerely, , �-� � G�1,^,,..�:� �s`' Charles E. Mertensotto Ma.yor cc: Kevin Howe, Metropolitan Council Kurt Johnson, Metropolitan Council � FOR IlV�ViF.DIATE I�ELEASE Februa.ry 7, 1996 MENDOTA I�IGHTS SUPPORTS COMPI.ETION OF For more information: TI� DUAL TRACK AIRPORT PL�?►NNI]NG STUDY Kevin Batchelder Interim City Administrator (612) 452-1850 The Mendota �3eights City Council, at their Febnaary 6, 1996 meeting, took official action to fully support the completion of the Dual Track Airport Planning Study and that they disagree with efforts to end the study prematurely. In particular, the Mendota. Heights City Council feels that efforts by State Senator Te�l Mondal� (St. Louis Park) and Governor Carlson, to end the study before it is completed, are shortsighted due to the enormous implicati.ons that the future of the auport will have on the metropolitan region and Minnssota.. The City Council is extremely concemed that the process is being speeded up right at the time that the Metropolitan Airports Commi�ssion is receiving comments of the Draft Environmental Impact SLudy (DEIS), which is intended to fully analyze and understand all the potential environmental, social and economic impacts of both airport options. The Environmental Impaet Study (EIS) process should be used to allow the Met�opolitan Airports Commission and our - ,; legislative representatives to fully understand each and every p'roposal in its entirety. If the EIS process is trunca.ted, it will not be possible for the Melxopolitan Airports Commission to respond to all the comments or to address any of the areas in which the DEIS may be deficient. This is of paxticular concern to the Mendota Heights City Council because all the impacted communities, at both the e�sting airport and the proposed aiiport site, are currently reviewing and commenting on the adequacy of the EIS. If these comments are to be properly considered and addressed, the EIS process must be allowed to proceed, as originally proposed in state la.w. ### February 9, 1996 Mr. Tom Lawell � City of Mendota. Heights 11�01 Victoria Curve �� Mendota. Heights, Minnesota. 55118 Dear Mr, Lawell: �.J�.. ,� ..a■►_ �� : �'� �� The Association for $ensible Airport Planning (A$Ap) believes that Minnesota does not need . and ca.nnot afford a new airport. A$AP supports improvements at the current. ai ort and ihe end of the duai-track planning process for a new airport. Legislation was intr�oduced last m nth by Senator Ted Mondale to d o j u s t t h a t. + New A$ A P mem bers are joining the fight each day and include business, individuals, labor, chambers of commerce, government and environmental ,groups. Relocating the airport would cost Minnesota taxpayers and businesses at least $4.6 billion. This does not include the �obs and tax revenues which would be dislbcated in communities around the existing airport. The agricultural economy in � Dakota County, which generated $450 million in revenues in 1994, would be severely damaged. If a new airport is built in rural Dakota County, 1 �,p00 acres of farmland will be paved and 7,684 acres of wildlife habitat will be lost. .. � It simnlv dn s not make sense fo the tate of innesota to build a new airnort A$AP is a coalition of individuals, organizations and businesses that needs your finan,cial and political support to e�d the dual track process 'and encourage the reasonable expansion of the present locafion. This decision should be made -in: the 1996 legislative session to put an end to this wasteful and unnecessary process. We support the legislation introduced by Senator Ted Mondale and others to end the dua.l-frack process. This legislation also requires quieter jets and more res'ources for noise mitigation. �, The legislature needs ta heaz our concerns and talce action. This is going to be a tough fight! Please, join me in supporting A$AP. Send your conlribution in the envelope provided in the amount of $2,500, $1,000 or $500 which will be used to support our efforts, The legislative session ends in less than two months, so please act fast! Thank you for your participation. Sincerely, ' . $_"z-----� St phen endersori, Chairman A$AP 0184883.01 7900 Xerxes Avenue South, Suite 1500 Bloomington, Minnesota 55431-1194 � (612) 835-3800 C ORGANIZATIONS IN RESOLUTION AGAINST BUILDING A NEW AIItPORT AND IN SUPPORT OF MAKING A DECISION THIS LEGISLATIVE SESSION UNTf5 OF GOVERNMENT: • Over 100 Minnesota Townships, with the 1996 Township Officers Association resolu6on pending action at the winter convention • Association ofMinnesota Counties led 6y resolutions &om Ramsey, Washington, Moka, Carver, Goodhue, and Dakota Counties • Metropotitan Inter-County Association (NIICA) • North Metro Mayors Association • City of Bloomington • City of Hastings • City of Rosemount • CityofLakevilie • City ofEagan • City of Prescott, WI • Dakota County Township Officers' Association • Minnesota-Wisconsin Boundary Commission LABOR ORGANIZATIONS: • International Assoc. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers • United Food & Commercial Workers Loca1789 • Oil, Atomic, and Chemical Workers Loca16-662 • St. Paul Central Labor Body • Minneapolis Central Labor Body • International Teamsters • Airtine Pilots Association SUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS: • Bloomington Chamber of Commerce • `fwin West Chamber of Commerce • St. Paul Chamber of Commerce • Forest Lake Chamber of Commerce • Richfield Chamber of Commerce • Edina Chamber of Commerce • Lakeville Chamber of Commerce • Burnsville Chamber of Commerce • Metro North/Anoka County Chamber of Commerce • South St. PauUtnver Crrove Heights Chamber of Commerce • Rochester Chamber of Commerce • Bloomington Convention & Visitors Bureau I i • Air Transport Association — • ResidenYairlines inctuding Northwest Airlines, Mesaba Airlines, and Sun Country Airiines • Frauenshuh Companies • Richfield Bank & Trust • MallofAmericaCompany • Marriott Hotel • Doubletree Grand.Hotel • Medical Institute of Minnesota • Trussbilt, Inc. • Sunde Land Surveying, Inc. • Alexis Bailley Winery • RetiaStar Financial Corp. • Bailey Nurseries • CF Industries • Mycogen Inc. • Pazk'n Go: Airport Parking • Hitchcock Industries • Hastings Business & Professional Women, pending before 29 chapters skatewide a MEPC American Properties Tnc • Marvin Lumber & Cedaz Co • Quality Lincoln Mercury e Geridian Corporation ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS: • North Star Chapter Sierra Club • Trout Unlimited • Minnesota Center for Environmental Action, � pending decision in January • Carpenter Foundation and the Cazpenter Nature Center • Land Stewardship Project and its 1,000 Friends Initiative • Cannon River Watecshed Partnership • Ciean Water Action (one of top three issues during 1995 conference) AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATIONS: • Minnesota Farm Bureau • Minnesota Irrigation Association • Minnesota Farmer's Union • Minnesota Soybean Growers Association, resolution decision pending by 2/4 OTIiER ORGANIZATIONS: • Transportation Advisory Boazd 0184916.01 a �► � ,��i \ I . SSOCIATi�N for �E�!SIBLE A1R�OP,1' PIANNING . . . - � . - 7900 Xerxes Avenue Souih : , : � Bloomington, tt�innesota 55431 . . . . . : .,� . .. .. : . . � � .. (612) 835-3800 : � WHY IV1�[Tf1VESOTA DUES NQT NEED A� NEW AIRPORT. � � ,. . . � �:. ' After�.investing�eight�years�and $1,0,�iillion�st�dying whether to build a.new airport; the results,aie.in, and�the : �. answer is clear. .Minnesota��ioes not' need and cannot afford a new airport. . �. �.. . .. . :: The En�ruonmental Impact Stucly {EIS) released in December:1995 demonstrates ihat-building a new airport is not necessary to meet growth in air tra�ic needs and will not create any economic gain for Minnesota. �, . . ., !�At a mi*iirnuan cost s�f �4.6.billian, M:nnesot� c�not afford a new. airpo�t. :.� . �� Do We Need a New �4irport� � � � . . . . . Builcling� a new airport will not create more �demand for air traff"ic, � nor will it lead. to :any �increased economic � .�` �benefits for. the state. According ta the EIS done for the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), the number . . of passengers; landi.ng .-and takeoffs would be .the same at � new airport or an . expanded airport. tis � Nigel . :Finriey,��Deputy �x�ecutive Director of Pla,nning' and Environment for MAC said, "The demand is the demand." �� An expanded airport is fully capable of har;dling anticipated growth in air traffic at a fraction of the cost: . ` Originatin.g Passengers .� Cannecting .passengers Passengers, i�andings and Takeoffs 1994 � , _ 6.9 million � 12.2 million -- 2020 . 16.7 million � � a I �l�akeof�s and.landiIIgS � ' 454,7Z3 . • i 520;400 . jr � �. �' � . �- Source: MetmpolitanAirportsCommission ,. i�. � � . Haw Much Will a New Airport Cost? A new airpoi`t will cost�a'minimum�of $4.6 billion, but if the_experience of Denver..is any indication, final costs are �likely to be at least: double that amoun� . � � . . � - I,, -- � Why Make a Decision Now? The Legislature has ,all the infonnation it needs to make a final decision. At $4.6 billion the EIS underestimates the iikely final cos� of building a new airport. Total costs are likely to run claser to $10 billioa when the costs of financing �� a�� bridges, overpasses � and other infrastruchu.e are added up, according to Jahn Brown & Company, the firm engaged by the MAC to, complete its finance study, T here a lso aze other, less tangible costs.to building �a new airport: � ° MOV�g �e au'Port 'will affect the pocketbooks of aIl Minnesotans by siphoning tax dollars into costl iufrastructure improvements in Dakota County, y ' Moving the airport will pull��obs, business tax revenues and economic opportunity awa� from Minneapolis, . St. Paul and the .communities along the I-494 corridor. . 'W6at are the Environmental �mplications? , � � - If a new airport is built in n�ral Dakota�County, 17,000 acres of farmland will be paved over and 7,684 acres of wiIdlife habita.t will be los� The site for the new airport is located on top of an aquifer tha.t is an important source of drinking water for many metropolitan area. residents. . � Leaving the airport in the Twin Cities also has impL'cations for people who are affected b y aiiport noise, but moving the airport just moves the problem to someone else's back yazd. As a matter of fairness, people subjected to bothersome noise levels deserve relief. Legisl�tion introduced -by Senator Ted Mondale will provide help by prohibiiing any expansion of the existing airport until all airlines using the facility ha.ve made a compiete h�nsition to quieter jets. The Mondale legislation also requires the MAC spend at least $18p million on noise mitigation. Moving the airport will severely damage the agriculture economy in I7akota County, which generated $450 million in revenues in 1994. The EIS has been released. The economic analysis showing the costs and benefits: of ea.ch alternative is avaiiable. There have been well over 100 pubIic heazings and millions of pages of analysis released to the public. The dual-track planning process has run its course and served its purpose well. The results lea.ve little doubt about the most sensible course of action. Minnesota does not need; does not want and cannot affard a new a.irport. The Legislature has a responsibility to make a decision now and let people get on with their Iives. ��----- � ASSOCIATION FOR $ENSIBI�E AIRPORT PLAN1�tING (A$AP) Membership Ducs for A$AP Ocganizationai Budg�t Year cnding June 30, 1996: Company Name � . Individusl Contact Name t Iddress � Telephone/Fax _ Membership Type: Business Executive Committee SS,OQO DirectorLevel ��,ppp Member $500 Supportec �$100 Public Body Organization 52.500 $2.500 $500 $500 �t00 $50 SO $0 Please mail completed form with your payment to: ASAP, Attn: Bili Griffith, 7900 Xerxes Avenae South, Suite 1500 Bloomiagto�, Miahesota 55431 612/835-3500