The URL can be used to link to this page

2014-02-25 Planning Comm Agenda PacketCITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS j PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 25, 2014 — 7:00 p.m. Mendota Heights City Hall 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Adopt Agenda 4. Approve January 28, 2014 Planning Commission Minutes 5. Election of Chair and Vice Chair 6. Introduction of Consulting Planner 7. Public Hearings (7:00 p.m. or shortly thereafter): a. Case No. 2014-04: Rod and Sue Stombaugh of 2266 Field Stone Road. Conditional Use Permit for covered front entryway within the required front yard setback. b. Case No. 2014-05: Jerry Trooien, on behalf of Alden and Joyce Landreville, of 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway. Lot split request at 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway. c. Case No. 2014-03: Code Amendment for Electronic Display Signs. d. Case No. 2014-06: United Properties for vacant parcels on Northland Drive in the Mendota Heights Business Park. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Amendment. 8. Verbal Review 9. Adjourn Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 120 hours in advance. If a notice of less than 120 hours is received, the City of Mendota Heights will make every attempt to provide the aids, however, this may not be possible on short notice. Please contact City Hall at 651.452.1850 with requests. Page 1 111 1 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 2 DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA 3 4 PLANNING COMMIS SON MINUTES 5 January 28, 2014 6 7 The regular meeting of the Mendota Heights Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, 8 January 28, 2014, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 1101 Victoria Curve at 7:00 p.m. 9 10 The following Commissioners were present: Chair Litton Field, Jr., Commissioners Howard 11 Roston, Michael Noonan, Doug Hennes, Robin Hennesey, Mary Magnuson, and Ansis Viksnins. 12 Those absent: None. Others present were City Planner Nolan Wall and Public Works 13 Director/City Engineer John Mazzitello. 14 15 Approval of Agenda 16 17 Chair Field outlined changes to the agenda that was submitted as follows: 18 19 Case 2014-02, Mark Gergen and Ruth Richardson, 1134 Dodd Road, Subdivision Request for 20 Lot Split was moved to the beginning of the public hearings section. 21 22 Case 2014-01, Dawn Nichols, on behalf of Convent of the Visitation School, 2455 Visitation 23 Drive, Code Amendment for Electronic Display Signage has been withdrawn. 24 25 Case 2013-22, Dawn Nichols, on behalf of Convent of the Visitation School, 2455 Visitation 26 Drive, Conditional Use Permit and variances for signage standards has been moved to the end of 27 the public hearings section. 28 29 The revised agenda was approved. 30 31 Approval of December 16, 2013 Minutes 32 33 COMMISSIONER HENNES MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO 34 APPROVE THE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 16, 2013, AS PRESENTED. 35 36 AYES: 7 37 NAYS: 0 38 39 Hearings 40 41 PLANNING CASE #2014-02 42 Mark Gergen on behalf of Ruth Richardson, 1134 Dodd Road 43 Subdivision Request for Lot Split 44 45 City Planner Nolan Wall explained that the applicant is requesting a lot split for their property 46 located at 1134 Dodd Road, corner of Dodd Road and Beebe Avenue. The property contains a Page 2 47 single family dwelling on .92 acres with access from Dodd Road. The applicant has a purchase 48 offer contingent on approval of this application. The property is zoned R-1 and guided for low 49 density residential use in the comprehensive plan. 50 51 The subdivision would create two lots meeting the lot size standards for the R-1 district. Parcel A 52 would be 19,945 square feet and Parcel B would be 19,975 square feet. The lot frontage on 53 Parcel A would be 99.26 feet, just short of the required 100 feet. Staff is willing to consider this 54 compliant due to the diminutive shortage. The lot is shown on the plat as being 100 feet by 200 55 feet; somewhere along the line they lost some footage. Parcel B would be compliant with the lot 56 width standard and both parcels are otherwise compliant with the R-1 requirements. 57 58 Staff recommended approval of this application with conditions. 59 60 Commissioners had a question regarding lot size measurements. 61 62 Mr. Mark Gergen, 18004 Jacquard Path, Lakeville, realtor and representative for the applicant, 63 was on hand to answer questions from the Commission. 64 65 Upon being questioned, Mr. Gergen stated that both lots would be used for single family homes 66 and that he understood and is in agreement to the conditions outlined for approval. The current 67 single family home would be demolished and another built on the lot. 68 69 Chair Field opened the public hearing. 70 71 Seeing no one coming forward wishing to speak, Chair Field asked for a motion to close the 72 public hearing. 73 74 COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO 75 CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. 76 AYES: 7 77 NAYS: 0 78 79 COMMISSIONER NOONAN MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, TO 80 RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SUBDIVISION REQUEST BASED ON THE FINDING 81 OF FACT THAT THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY 82 CODE AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 83 1. The existing single family dwelling is demolished prior to the subdivision being recorded 84 by Dakota County. 85 2. Park dedication fee, in lieu of land, is collected after City Council approval and before 86 issuance of any additional permits by the City. 87 3. Street reconstruction assessment fee, as part of Somerset View Improvement No. 2004- 88 01, is collected for each lot with access from Beebe Avenue after City Council approval 89 and before issuance of any additional permits by the City. 90 4. Connections charges for street, sanitary sewer and water main shall be paid prior to 91 issuance of a building permit. Page 3 92 5. The applicant shall dedicate 10-foot wide drainage and utility easements along the front 93 property lines and 5-foot wide drainage and utility easements along the rear property 94 liens to be denoted on the certificate of survey submitted to Dakota County. 95 6. The applicant shall submit grading and utility plans and a dimensioned site plan, subject 96 to review and approval by the City Engineering Department. 97 7. The applicant shall obtain approval from MnDOT for any new driveway access to Parcel 98 A, as shown on the certificate of survey as part of the application. 99 AND THAT THE DIMINUTIVE FRONTAGE IS ACCEPTABLE AND CONSISTENT WITH 100 THE CODE AND THE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 101 102 AYES: 7 103 NAYS: 0 104 105 Chair Field advised the City Council would consider this recommendation at its February 3, 106 2014 meeting. 107 108 PLANNING CASE #2013-22 109 Dawn Nichols, on behalf of Convent of the Visitation School, 2455 Visitation Drive 110 Conditional Use Permit and variances for signage standards 111 Continuation of December Planning Commission meeting 112 113 City Planner Nolan Wall reminded the Commission that the applicant is seeking permits to 114 accommodate a comprehensive sign plan for their campus located at 2455 Visitation Drive. The 115 purpose is to consider existing and planned improvements for their signage to hopefully avoid 116 future planning approvals. Then the approved signs, as a part of this plan, would only require 117 sign permits as long as they are compliant with the approved plan. 118 119 The request includes Conditional Use Permit and Variance applications as follows: 120 121 1. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow wall signage in excess of the standard 122 12 square feet for non - residential uses in an R -1 zone. 123 a. Staff recommended approval based on the findings of fact 124 2. Consideration of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a second nameplate sign of up to 100 125 square feet for non - residential uses in an R -1 zone. 126 a. Staff recommended approval, with the condition that staff work with the applicant 127 to determine an alternate location or sign design that complies with the code 128 based on the findings of fact 129 3. Consideration of a Variance to exceed the maximum number and square footage for 130 signage (3 signs at 212 square feet maximum, 15 signs at 478 square feet proposed). 131 a. Staff recommended approval based on the findings of fact 132 4. Consideration of a Variance to height for Entry Gate Sign (20 feet ± over the standard of 133 9 feet in height). 134 a. Staff recommended denial based on the findings of fact 135 5. Consideration of a Variance to School Gate Sign (12 feet ± over the standard of 9 feet in 136 height). 137 a. Staff recommended approval based on the findings of fact Page 4 138 6. Consideration of a Variance to Sign Display (Electronic Digital Message Board). 139 140 Mr. Wall noted that item number 6 has been withdrawn by the applicant as the City Council is 141 planning to start a City -initiated process to look a code amendment for digital signage. 142 143 Chair Field reminded everyone that this public hearing was left open at the December 16, 2013 144 Planning Commission meeting. 145 146 Commissioners asked questions regarding the height of the signs, the difference between a 147 `landscape feature' and a `sign', and whether or not the Commission should wait on this decision 148 based on the Council's plan to engage in a comprehensive sign review [Council plans to review 149 digital signage only]. 150 151 Dr. Dawn Nichols, Head of the Convent of the Visitation School and Mr. Scott Shifflett of Opus 152 Design Build addressed the Commission and was available to answer questions. 153 154 Commissioners asked for an explanation of what would be unique or a hardship that would 155 necessitate approval of the variance requests. 156 157 Mr. Eric Palmer, 2371 Kressin Avenue, originally came to speak against the digital signage 158 proposal [request was withdrawn]. He has also spoken out in the past against having any more 159 commercial impact upon a residential area. He is fully supportive of signage within the internal 160 areas of Visitation and has no issue with signage on the overpass; however, he requested that the 161 Commission take a closer look as he does not believe that any landscape feature would be 162 allowed over a right-of-way. 163 164 As no one else came forward wishing to speak Chair Field asked for a motion to close the public 165 hearing. 166 167 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER NOONAN, TO 168 CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. 169 AYES: 7 170 NAYS: 0 171 172 Commissioners asked additional questions and had discussions regarding the variances and what 173 the findings would be and not be, clarifying questions on height restrictions, imposing residential 174 standards on an institutional structure, 175 176 Items 1 and 2 177 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER ROSTON TO 178 RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW WALL 179 SIGNAGE IN EXCESS OF THE STANDARD 12 SQUARE FEET FOR NON - 180 RESIDENTIAL USES IN AN R -1 ZONE; AND TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A 181 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SECOND NAMEPLATE SIGN OF UP TO 100 182 SQUARE FEET FOR NON - RESIDENTIAL USES IN AN R -1 ZONE BASED ON THE 183 FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT: Page 5 184 1. The applicant for a second nameplate and additional wall signage has property along 185 Mendota Heights Road, a major transportation corridor in the City. 186 2. Institutional uses predominate along this roadway, generating significant traffic from the 187 large facilities and mix of activities on the subject property. 188 3. The main buildings on the property, although fronting on Mendota Heights Road, are set 189 back significant distances without extensive visual exposure to the main entrance drive. 190 4. The property, and visiting traffic, would benefit from additional exposure at the main 191 entrance drive, beyond that of the zoning allowances of 12 square feet. 192 5. The applicants have proposed additional nameplate and wall signage that meets the intent 193 of the Zoning Ordinance allowances for non - residential uses in a residential zone, and 194 (with specific exceptions noted in the staff report) the particular requirements of the 195 Zoning Ordinance. 196 6. The proposed signage would not be visible from, nor compromise the character of, the 197 residential neighborhood that adjoins the applicant's property. 198 7. Where portions of the site signage may be visible, extensive setbacks and existing 199 vegetation make such signage unreadable to residential property. 200 8. Subject to consideration of specific variances processed concurrently with the 201 Conditional Use Permits, the proposed signage is compatible with the character, design, 202 and materials as intended for such uses. 203 204 AYES: 7 205 NAYS: 0 206 207 Item 3 208 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES TO 209 RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM NUMBER 210 AND SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR SIGNAGE (3 SIGNS AT 212 SQUARE FEET MAXIMUM, 211 15 SIGNS AT 478 SQUARE FEET PROPOSED) BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS 212 OF FACT: 213 1. Sign display for much of the signage on the property is only visible to internal site users, 214 and not to the general public. 215 2. Numerous sign locations are important to distribute and direct traffic within the site and 216 along the main entry drive. 217 3. Sign display that is visible to external traffic or property owners appears to be within the 218 allowances of the sign ordinance. 219 4. Restricting sign numbers and square footage to just 3 signs with no more than 212 square 220 feet, as required by the ordinance, would create a practical difficulty in making 221 reasonable use of the property, which is comprised of large buildings and generates 222 different types of traffic. 223 5. Because only a limited portion of the proposed signage is visible to the general public, 224 the signage as proposed complies with the intent of the sign ordinance, which is to limit 225 traffic confusion and negative aesthetic impacts on surrounding property. 226 6. The sign plans as proposed (or as modified under the City's approval) facilitate 227 reasonable use of the property as a private school and monastery, uses which are 228 consistent with the zoning and land use plans of the city in this location. 229 Commissioner Roston recommended a seventh finding: Page 6 230 7. The unique nature of the property is that it is a school in a residential district and there is 231 practical difficulties, including visitors, guests, and others in need of direction to justify 232 the additional signage. 233 Commissioner Viksnins and Commissioner Hennes approved the addition to the motion. 234 235 AYES: 7 236 NAYS: 0 237 238 Item 4 239 COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS MOVED TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF A VARIANCE TO 240 HEIGHT FOR ENTRY GATE SIGN (20 FEET ± OVER THE STANDARD OF 9 FEET IN 241 HEIGHT) BASED ON THE FACT THAT IT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT 242 CODE REQUIREMENTS 243 244 The motion failed for lack of a second. 245 246 COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER HENNES, 247 TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO HEIGHT FOR ENTRY GATE SIGN 248 (20 FEET ± OVER THE STANDARD OF 9 FEET IN HEIGHT) BASED ON THE 249 FOLLOWING: 250 1 The sign is consistent with a reasonable use of the property. 251 2. The sign, as proposed, complies with the intent to limit traffic confusion and to properly 252 identify the monastery and the school. 253 3. There are practical difficulties in having a different sort of sign in that the sign could be 254 within the nine foot requirement but that would impede the ability of trucks, fire 255 equipment, and various other necessary vehicles from getting underneath it. So by virtue 256 of the need to gain access to the property by those vehicles, it has to be above the nine 257 foot line and, in fact, above sixteen feet in order to allow proper egress and ingress. 258 4. The structure of the sign is not inconsistent with the residential area in large measure 259 because the location is not anywhere near any residences but is, in fact, on a rather busy 260 road — being Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road and on the round -about — so there 261 would be no negative impact on any home within the area. 262 263 Public Works Director/City Engineer John Mazzitello noted because this sign would be located 264 within a public right-of-way and at the time of the application for a sign permit to construct this 265 within the public right-of-way, the applicant would need to obtain a right-of-way permit from 266 city staff and a variance for constructing a sign inside of a public right-of-way. 267 268 Commission Roston recommended additional conditions for approval: 269 1. The applicant obtains a right-of-way permit from city staff. 270 2. The applicant obtains whatever approvals are necessary to place the sign in a public right - 271 of -way. 272 3. The applicant works with city staff as to the exact location of the sign to the extent that it 273 remains in the public right-of-way. 274 Additional discussion occurred regarding the depth of the public right-of-way and on who 275 maintains the private drive. Page 7 276 Commissioner Magnuson and Commissioner Hennes accepted the addition to the motion. 277 278 AYES: 6 279 NAYS: 1 (VIKSNINS) 280 281 Item 5 282 COMMISSIONER ROSTON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MAGNUS ON, 283 TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE TO SCHOOL GATE SIGN (12 FEET ± 284 OVER THE STANDARD OF 9 FEET IN HEIGHT), BASED ON THE FOLLOWING 285 FINDINGS OF FACT: 286 1. Sign display for much of the signage on the property is only visible to internal site users, 287 and not to the general public. 288 2. The proposed sign is significantly lower than the surrounding building height. 289 3. The message portion of the structure appears to meet the 9 foot height standard, and only 290 the architectural portion of the structure rises above that elevation. 291 4. Because the proposed signage is not visible to the general public, the signage as proposed 292 complies with the intent of the sign ordinance, which is to limit traffic confusion and 293 negative aesthetic impacts on surrounding property. 294 5. The sign plans as proposed (or as modified under the City's approval) facilitate 295 reasonable use of the property as a private school and monastery, uses which are 296 consistent with the zoning and land use plans of the city in this location. 297 AND WITH THE ADDITION OF THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT: 298 6. The sign is consistent with a reasonable use of the property. 299 7. The sign, as proposed, complies with the intent to limit traffic confusion and to properly 300 identify the monastery and the school. 301 8. There are practical difficulties in having a different sort of sign in that the sign could be 302 within the nine foot requirement but that would impede the ability of trucks, fire 303 equipment, and various other necessary vehicles from getting underneath it. So by virtue 304 of the need to gain access to the property buy those vehicles, it has to be above the nine 305 foot line and, in fact, above sixteen feet in order to allow proper egress and ingress. 306 9. The structure of the sign is not inconsistent with the residential area in large measure 307 because the location is not anywhere near any residences but is, in fact, on a rather busy 308 road — being Mendota Heights Road and Dodd Road and on the round -about — so there 309 would be no negative impact on any home within the area. 310 311 Commissioner Roston asked that the record reflect that he does not believe there needs to be a 312 variance for this at all. He believes it is an architectural feature and they could build it without 313 the need for a variance. Commissioner Hennes agreed and noted that this is reflected in finding 314 number three. 315 316 AYES: 6 317 NAYS: 1 (VIKSNINS) 318 Chair Field advised the City Council would consider these recommendations at its February 3, 319 2014 meeting. 320 Page 8 321 Discussion occurred regarding bringing a recommendation to the Council as to signage of 322 institutional uses in the residential districts. Planner Wall stated that he would make this a point 323 of further presentation to the City Council regarding the context and discussion from this 324 meeting. If the City Council feels this is something that needs to be addressed then it would be 325 brought back to the Commission. 326 327 Discussion of City -initiated Code Amendment Regarding Electronic Display Signage 328 329 City Planner Nolan Wall gave a brief background of the proposed code amendment and 330 requested the Commission have a broad -natured discussion and provide feedback in terms of 331 what the next steps should be. This issue was identified in the City Council's 2014 Work Plan as 332 something to be addressed. 333 334 It is staff's intent to bring back an application for a city -initiated code amendment limited to 335 electronic display signage for institutional uses. 336 337 Commissioners asked questions and provided comments regarding hours of operation, revised 338 sign area standard, zoning districts and institutional definitions, minimum lot sizes, compatibility 339 of adjoining uses, define `electronic display sign' in some fashion, and a recommendation that 340 staff take a close look at past findings of fact for denial of electronic display signage and see 341 what has changed significantly that would support a change in the code. 342 343 Verbal Review 344 345 Planner Wall gave the following verbal review: 346 347 PLANNING CASE #2013-21 348 Michael McEllistrem, 1349 Knollwood Lane 349 Lot split of vacant, unaddressed parcel owned by Robert Hockett of 1335 Knollwood Lane 350 • Approved by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission 351 352 Planner Wall noted that the next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for February 25, 353 2014 and staff intends to bring the code amendment application back with feedback received 354 from other stakeholders. 355 356 COMMISSIONER MAGNUSON MOVED, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER VIKSNINS, 357 TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:32 P.M. 358 359 AYES: 7 360 NAYS: 0 Page 9 El irvrol""' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: February 25, 2014 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: 2014 Chair and Vice Chair Appointments BACKGROUND 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota•heights.com Title 2-1-3 of the City Code requires election of a planning commission chairperson and vice chairperson at the February meeting each year. The term of both officers will last one year and become effective at the March meeting. Also attached is the entire Code section regarding the planning commission for your reference. BUDGET IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission take action to elect a chairperson and vice chairperson. This matter requires a simple majority vote. Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 1 of 3 Page 10 Chapter 1 PLANNING COMMISSION 2-1-1: COMMISSION ESTABLISHED: The planning commission for the city is hereby established. (1981 Code 108 § 1) 2-1-2: COMPOSITION; APPOINTMENT; TERMS OF OFFICE: The planning commission shall consist of seven (7) residents of the city, appointed by the mayor with the consent of the majority of the members of the city council. The members shall serve terms of three (3) years. The terms shall be staggered so that terms of two (2) members shall expire each year. No member shall be appointed to more than three (3) consecutive full terms. A member appointed to fill an unexpired term on the commission may be appointed to serve three (3) consecutive terms after completing the unexpired term, but in no case shall the individual serve more than eleven (11) consecutive years. The term limits imposed in this section apply to service on the planning commission and shall not be deemed to restrict an individual from being appointed to a different city commission after completing three (3) or fewer consecutive terms on the planning commission. Council may, in its discretion, appoint an individual who has already completed three (3) terms on the commission, but in no case shall the appointment be effective until twelve (12) months after that individual has completed his/her third term. (Ord. 428, 3-16-2010) 2-1-3: OFFICERS: At the organizational meeting of the planning commission held in February of each year, the planning commission shall elect a chairperson and a vice chairperson from among its members. The terms of such officers shall be for a period of one year. (1981 Code 108 § 2; amd. 2003 Code) 2-1-4: VACANCIES IN OFFICE: A. Causes Of Vacancy: Any of the following may cause the office of a member to become vacated: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 2/19/2014 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 3 Page 11 1. Death; 2. Disability or failure to serve, as shown by failure to attend four (4) regularly scheduled meetings in any one calendar year; 3. Removal of residence from the city; 4. Resignation in writing; or (1981 Code 108 § 6) 5. Behavior deemed inappropriate by the city council. (Ord. 428, 3-16-2010) B. Filling Vacancies: Vacancies shall be filled as soon as possible for the unexpired portion of the term by the mayor with the consent of the majority of the members of the city council. (1981 Code 108 § 6) 2-1-5: MEETINGS; PROCEDURES; RECORDS: The commission shall hold at least one meeting each month at a time regularly established and approved by the city council and shall hold such special meetings as may be necessary for the conduct of its business. The commission shall adopt rules for the transaction of business and shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions and findings, which record shall be maintained as a public record. The commission shall submit to the city council a true and correct copy of all of its minutes, recommendations and other reports. (1981 Code 108 § 4) 2-1-6: POWERS AND DUTIES: The planning commission shall make studies, investigations and recommendations to the council regarding matters affecting general matters of planning including zoning, transportation, platting, and public improvements and such other related matters as may be assigned to it by the city council. The planning commission shall, if requested by the city council, adopt a comprehensive municipal plan for future developments and land use, and may, with consent of the council, prepare a capital improvements program for the purpose of determining priorities and apportioning the costs of scheduled public improvements. The commission shall, in performing the aforementioned responsibilities, exhibit the initiative in formulating plans which will be responsive to the anticipated needs and objectives of the city. (1981 Code 108 § 3) 2-1-7: COMPENSATION: http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 2/19/2014 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Page 12 The members of the planning commission shall be paid a stipend for each meeting they attend. The stipend amount is set by the city council. (Ord. 428, 3-16-2010) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/printnow.php 2/19/2014 Page 13 El irvrol"""' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: February 25, 2014 TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Consulting Planner Introduction BACKGROUND 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55116 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota•heights.com The Council authorized the release of a Planning Services RFP in October 2013. The RFP was distributed to firms who responded to previous requests and was posted on the City and APA -MN websites. Seven proposals were received. After review by Staff, three firms were recommended for interviews with the Council on December 17, 2013. Following the interviews, Staff was directed to negotiate a contract with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. for consulting planning services. Tina Goodroad, AICP will serve as the City's new Consulting Planner. Ms. Goodroad has 20 years of planning experience and will be a great resource for Staff and the Planning Commission on land use and zoning issues. BUDGET IMPACT The City is contracting consulting planning services on an hourly, as -needed basis. If necessary, the City may also request specific proposals for project planning with the contracted consultant. RECOMMENDATION N/A Page 14 flow"' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DATE: February 25, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota-heights.com SUBJECT: Planning Case 2014-04 Conditional Use Permit for Covered Front Entryway Encroachment APPLICANT: Rod and Sue Stombaugh PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2266 Field Stone Drive ZONING/GUIDED: R-1 One Family Residential/LR Low Density Residential 60 -DAY DEADLINE: April 5, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant is seeking approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for construction of a covered front entryway within the required front yard setback. Title 12-1D-4(C)(2)(a) of the Code allows this type of structure to encroach into the front yard, as long as certain conditions are met. BACKGROUND The subject parcel is 0.49 acres and contains a single-family residential dwelling. In addition, it is zoned R-1 and guided for low density residential development. The applicants are proposing to construct a covered entryway over the existing front stoop to provide for protection and improved architectural features. As noted, encroachments for this type of structure are allowed with the following conditions: 12-1D-4: YARDS AND OPEN SPACES C. Allowed Encroachments: The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard and setback requirements: 2. Front yard: a. Covered and/or enclosed entryways (porches, decks, stoops, or similar structures) that extend into the front yard setback shall require the approval of a conditional use permit, subject to compliance with the following conditions: (1) Such structure may not extend into the front or side yard more than five feet (5). (2) Such structure shall be limited in size to fifty (50) square feet. (3) Such structure may not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan The subject parcel is guided LR, Low Density Residential in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The proposed construction of a covered front entryway supports continued low density residential use on the parcel. Page 15 Encroachment Conditions The required front yard setback in the R-1 District is 30 feet. The subject parcel is located along a partial cul-de-sac which causes a curvilinear front yard setback line. The existing dwelling is compliant with the setback requirement, but the proposed covered entryway structure would encroach into the setback area. The following conditions must be complied with in order for a CUP to be granted for the proposed project: Condition Covered Entryway Encroachment Such structure may not extend into the front or side yard more than five feet (5') 2'-6"at the greatest point/12" at the least Such structure shall be limited in size to fifty (50) square feet 15 square feet Such structure may not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building Compliant (as shown on sheet A4 & AS) As shown in the table above, the proposed covered front entryway complies with the required conditions. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit, based on the findings of fact. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Recommend approval of the conditional use permit request, based on the finding of facts. OR 2. Recommend denial of the conditional use permit request, based on the finding of fact that the proposed project is not consistent with the City Code. OR 3. Table the request. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1. Findings of Fact 2. Aerial Site Map 3. Planning Application, including supporting materials Page 16 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit Request for Covered Front Entryway 2266 Field Stone Drive The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed request: 1. The existing use of the subject parcel as a single-family residential dwelling is consistent with the City Code and Comprehensive Plan. 2. The partial cul-de-sac frontage creates a curvilinear front yard setback line to parallel the street and the current location of the dwelling results in the encroachment in the proposed design of the covered front entryway. 3. The proposed covered front entryway cannot be accommodated within the required setbacks without altering the design given the location of the existing dwelling. 4. The encroachment, as designed, is not incompatible with the uses and character of the neighborhood or for a single-family residential dwelling. 5. The proposed structure is compliant with the conditions included in the City Code that allow it by conditional use permit. Page 17 2266 Field Stone Drive Planning Case 2014-04 Date: 2/19/2014 0 40 SCALE IN FEET City of Mendota Heights i`h(ilfr}}}t ;il((i(SftfS�4'z`' GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 18 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55112 651.452.185( phone 1 651,452.8940 fax w WwinendOta-h ights.corn MENDOTA HEIGHTS APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Property Address/Street Location: 2266 Field Stone Drive Applicant Name: Rod and Sue Stombaugh Phone: 651-454-4538 Applicant E -Mail Address: rstombaugh@alumaspec.com, sstombaugh@hotmail.com Applicant Mailing Address: 2266 Field Stone Drive, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Property Owner Name: Rod and Sue Stombaugh Phone: 651-454-4538 Property Owner Mailing Address: 2266 Field Stone Drive, Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) PIN#: 27 18302 02 180 Legal Descriuption: Lot 18, Block 2, Copperfield 3rd Addition Type of Request: ❑ Rezoning ❑ Variance ❑ Subdivision Approval ❑ Other: IR Conditional Use Permit ❑ Wetlands Permit ❑ Critical Area Permit ❑ Conditional Use Permit for PUD ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment 1 hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. 1 further authorize City Officials and agents to pect the above property during daylight hours. 1-24-14 Date 1-24-14 Signature of Owner Date 1-24-14 Signature of Owner (if re than one) Date Planning Application (modified 12/6/2013) Page 1 of 1 Page 19 CI'T'Y OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN 55112 651.4523850 phone 651/452.3940 fax wwa:mendota-hei jht ,com CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: ® Dated original of all the materials checked must be submitted by the end of the business day the Monday before the first Tuesday of the month. ® If all original materials are 11 x 17 or smaller — only submit originals. ® If materials are larger than 11 x 17, please provide 24 copies, folded to 81/2 x 11. ® Any drawing in color must submit 24 copies. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: id Fee., as included in Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights) NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required for you to complete your project. LN Completed Application Form (only original needs to be submitted). • Sketch plan showing all pertinent dimensions, and including the location of any easements having an influence upon the variance request. ❑ Letter of Intent. Site Development Plan, including: ❑ Location of all buildings, including existing and proposed. ❑ Location of all adjacent buildings located within 350' of the exterior boundaries of the property in question. ❑ Floor area ratio. ❑ Location and number of existing and proposed parking spaces. ❑ Vehicular circulation. • Architectural elevations (type and materials used on all external surfaces). ❑ Sewer and water alignment, existing and proposed. ❑ Location and candle power of all luminaries. ❑ Location of all existing easements. Conditional Use Permit Request (modified 12/6/2013) Page 1 of 2 Dimension Plan, including: ❑ Lot dimensions and area. ❑ Dimensions of proposed and existing structures. ❑ "Typical" floor plan and "typical" room plan. ❑ Setbacks on all structures existing or proposed on property in question. ❑ Proposed setbacks. Grading Plan, including: ❑ Existing contour. ❑ Proposed grading elevations. ❑ Drainage configuration. ❑ Storm sewer catch basins and invert elevations. ❑ Spot elevations. ❑ Proposed road profile. Landscape Plan, including: ❑ Location of all existing trees, type, diameter and which trees will be removed. ❑ Location, type and diameter of all proposed plantings. ❑ Location and material used of all screening devices. NOTES: Per our communications with Nolan Wall, a City Planner with Mendota Heights, the items listed above under the headings Site Development Plan, Dimension Plan, Grading and Landscape Plans are not pertinent to this conditional use permit request. Per his direction, included with this request is a partial site plan and exterior elevation of the proposed entry porch. The attached 8 1/2 x11 drawings describe the requested encroachment. Sheet A1- Survey of the entire property Sheet A2- Site Plan at 1" = 10'-0" Sheet A3- Enlarged Site Plan- House and Front Yard Sheet A4- Entry Porch- Partial West Exterior Elevation Sheet A5- Entry Porch Section Conditional Use Permit Request (modified 12/6/2013) Page 2 of 2 Page 20 McMonigal f 'Architects LETTER OF INTENT Date: January 24, 2014 To: City of Mendota Heights Planning Dept. Project: Stombaugh Residence 2266 Field Stone Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 From: Rosemary McMonigal Rod and Sue Stombaugh would like to build a covered entry to their existing front stoop. This new entry porch will help protect people entering the house from the elements, and it will also enhance the appearance of the symmetrical, Colonial -style home. The new roof structure is designed to cover the existing concrete steps only, the front stoop will not be enlarged from its current size. P:\projects\2013\1317\corr\govt\CUP\CUPletterofintent.docx McMonigal :\rLhitects, i.i.c 1227 Tyler Street NI. Suite 100 Minneapolis MN 55.113 612.331.1244 mcmonigal.com Page 21 MOM, WOLOW PM MO Me WM LOY I mom worm • mom room 6 64.11'06• a i72,02 • wal1M O^� THE STOMBAUGH RESIDENCE LOT 18, BLOCK 2, COPPERFIELD 3RD ADDITION 2266 FIELD STONE DRIVE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA EIVIM 111.114.1.0/6 Ler om OA AA� ZON1116 SEOLII1RMd1Te 1.6 01.5.1.1.1,11M011101.1.121811.. MOW NK wee eat Pt MNOIMMNLMl6 NkIMVOIOLW 011210111., WD*MMKAN. mon so pwr pe mow wo. MM. N0916 MoMla TOMO in mom 'Am no mom or me Immo mom mom me Mmtl►N/111116I11�J A9. MIOIMP MT. Or 011IM Mr 0 60,1116M111 AYMPAIM LOT PPM IIK116404 M11. MM. IIM*IMAM 011, fon'n GT' aNNW $ec'IOOMi6ISr 001.cda11w1 osIMOMO wows snow wwe meow,* —0 wets was commw pm. IMIK6g0 Waren. N B 1M0 8 mammy. 1.1.41,186 M A• we aux two KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. PROPESSIONAL LARD SURVEYORS mI 01 I ImMMCUh lMmempommt CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY J: \2013\ 1317\GOVT \CUP-SitePlan.dwg am mom. mow mow MRIeNlomem. Imo NI�tM0.1AMIlpnum mew wTA VINMI6 •112.1-111. LO 11 ! 1.00 MOOIb moo • Jempro mom SHEET RDER N MRNII WWWWW RIIIR IIO IMMAMMNOOLVAMOI N RROMORMMOMNI MOMMORNM M CNONOGRWOMAN M PIM PAW OOOIMP OCOMOORNAM AMMO. N 110/MOOR MOM MAIM. AO SCMCMOOIl WOW MOMMOORMP Al MIR Plat OMMM10NAMPO IMRN IMMMAPP A7 MR'OOMOOMIMOIOROR/NO0 46 fMHOMNY 'UMW MNRO Page 22 McMonigal Architects McMonigal Architects . LLC 1227 Tyler St NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 5541:3 Rasernary 6Ic6Ianlgal, AIA 512 331-1244 Pmlecl STOMBAUGH RESIDENCE 2266 Field Stone Drive Mendota Helgbts, MN 55120 Omer Rod & Sue Stombaugb Arablteens Project #1317 January 24, 2014 leis ,an alion ntleron Registration Revisions SITE PLAN Al OF5 815.44 100.45 8. FOUND /2" IRON IPE EL 515.31 A2 SITE PLAN lu o IQI_Du Page 23 McMonigal Architects McMonigal Architects, LLC 1227 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 Rosemary McMonigal, AIA 612 331-1244 Project STOMBAUGH RESIDENCE 2266 Field Stone Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Owner Rod & Sue Stombaugh Architect's Project 41317 January 24, 2014 100Revisions Number Description Date SITE PLAN A2 OF 5 COPYRIGHT 2014 rkMONIGAL ARCHITECTS, LLC /5 Page 24 'McMonigal Architects McMonigal Architects, LLC 1227 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 Rosemary McMonigal, AIA 612 331-1244 Project STOMBAUGH RESIDENCE 2266 Field Stone Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Owner Rod & Sue Stombaugh Ti RNFR Or. N AREA OF ENGROAGHMENT: 15 5.F. EDGE OF NEW PORCH ROOF A=•YE. EXG GOND LANDING it STEPS. BASE OF NEW POST. 0100.0 / TR T T A3 ENLAR6E0 SITE FLAN 1/4" = 1'-0"" Architect's Project 41317 January 24, 2014 Revisions Number Description Date ENLARGED SITE PLAN - HOUSE & FRONT YARD A3 OF 5 COPYRIGHT 2014 u uONIGAL ARCHITECTS, LLC 2 nnnnnnnnnnnnnnn ALIGN HT nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn- i ENTRY FORGH - PARTIAL !NEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A4 1/2" = II -0" Page 25 McMonigal Architects McMonigal Architects, LLC 1227 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 Rosemary McMonigal, AIA 612 331-1244 Project STOMBAUGH RESIDENCE 2266 Field Stone Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Owner Rod & Sue Stombaugh Architect's Project 41317 January 24, 2014 Revisions Number Description Date EXTERIOR ELEVATION AT PORCH A4 OF 5 COPYRIGHT 2014 rkMONIGAL ARCHITECTS, LLC T.O. ROOF I' -b" 21/2" T.O. STRUGT cm 12 4 - -10" 2/1/?" I'-/_" 2xb RIDGE BEAM. 2xb HORIZ WD DENTIL MOLDING. nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 1.L ENTRY PORCH SECTION ASPHALT SHINGLES OVER 2 LAYER 15# FELT W/ PREFIN MTL DRIP EDGE OVER 1/2" PAD SHTG, TYP. 2xb GABLE LADDER 24" OC MAX, TYP. 1x3 COMPOSITE FASCIA TRIM, GUT TO FIT. 2x8 SUB FASCIA, GUT TO FIT. IxIO COMPOSITE FASCIA, GUT TO FIT. Ix3 IND, CUT TO FIT. WD PNL. POST 5/4x6 COMPOSITE BASE TRIM. EXG GONG STOOP 4 FND TO REMAIN. Page 26 McMonigal Architects McMonigal Architects, LLC 1227 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 Rosemary McMonigal, AIA 612 331-1244 Project STOMBAUGH RESIDENCE 2266 Field Stone Drive Mendota Heights, MN 55120 Owner Rod & Sue Stombaugh Architect's Project #1317 January 24, 2014 Revisions Number Description Date SECTION AT PORCH A5 / 1/2" = 1'-0" A5 OF 5 COPYRIGHT 2014 u uONIGAL ARCHITECTS, LLC Page 27 � �� Affidavit ��Publication State of Miunesota Kf S Cvoo�'vfI}uko� � -`-' — ` __- A2NNEIBILLEN being duly sworn, on oath,, says that he/she is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as SOUTH-WEST REVIEW . and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) 'The newspaper has complied with all of the requirementconstituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. NOTICE (B) The printed -' — 77[E OF H which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on SUNDAY. the 9TH day of FEBRUARY , 2014 , and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including , the day of , 20 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z. both ino|uoiva, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: Subscribed and sworn to before me on thie 10TH day of FIIBR{IARY. ,^ 14 BY: Al& TITLE LEGAL COORDINATOR Notary Public *Alphabet should be in the same size and kind of type as the notice. TONYA R. WHITEHEAD Notary mvCommission Evm�Jan m.2015 RATE INFORMATION (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space $25.00 per col. inch (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter $25.00 per col. inch (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter per col. inch 1/14 Page 28 CITY OF'MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCTA COVERED ENTRYWAY WITHIN -- THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given -that the Planning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, February 25, 2014 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider , an application from Rod and Sue Stombaugh for a conditional- use permit " to construct a 'covered entryway within the , required front yard setback at 2266 Field Stone Drive. This' request has been assigned Planning Case number 2014-04. This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter 1 of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this meeting: Lorri Smith City Clerk (South-West Review: Feb. 9, 2014) Planning Case 2014-O4 _ Public Hearing Notice Mailing List (page 1) 381175001010 271830202160 2250 DELAWARE AVE Ei 2270 FIELD STONE DR 2250 DELAWARE LLC FRANCIS W & PAULINE FAN 381175001030 271830202130 2300 DELAWARE AVE CEI2278 FIELD STONE DR 2250 DELAWARE LLC GAYLE NEWMAN 271830301150 387640001030 538 STONE RD 0 425 SALEM CHURCH RD BRUCE N & SUSAN D DAVIS J KEVIN COSTLEY 271830202140 271830301100 0 2274 FIELD STONE DR 133 2258 FIELD STONE DR CAMERON & CHRISTINE JOHNSON J MICHAEL NOONAN 271830201040 Q 2275 FIELD STONE DR CHRISTOPHER J STONE 271830202070 2306 COPPERFIELD DR JAMES E & ROBIN P LACKNER 271830202040 271830202170 2328 COPPERFIELD DR IID 2268 FIELD STONE DR CLIFTON G HULL JANE LALLY MONTEI 271830201060 271830301090 Q 2263 FIELD STONE DR 0 2254 FIELD STONE DR CRAIG L WILLIAMS JOHN R & CAROLYNNE BULGER 271830202200 271830301110 D 2262 FIELD STONE DR ED 2259 FIELD STONE DR DAVID J & REBECCA A MELCHER JON & JACQUELINE R BRUNSBERG Y 271830201050 271830301160 0 2273 FIELD STONE DR 542 STONE RD DAVID M & REBECCA J ENSTENESS MORGAN W & CELINE M DONOHUE 271830202060 271830202080 2314 COPPERFIELD DR 2298 COPPERFIELD DR DAVID RISCHALL PAMELA 3 & MICHAEL 3 GILBERG Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. Map Scale 1 inch = 363 feet 1/31/2014 Page 29 Planning Case 2014-04 - Public Hearing Notice Mailing List (page 2) 271830202190 2264 FIELD STONE DR PATRICK 3 & SHELBY 3 FISCHER 271830202050 2320 COPPERFIELD DR PATRICK M DORAN 271830202180 2266 FIELD STONE DR RODNEY L & SUSAN L STOMBAUGH 271830202090 2290 COPPERFIELD DR SOLVEIG L TSCHANN 271830202150 0 2272 FIELD STONE DR THEODORE M KRONSCHNABEL 271830201070 0 2269 FIELD STONE DR THOMAS K DOLAN 271830301120 2255 FIELD STONE DR TIMOTHY A & KRYSTON FISCHER Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. Map Scale 1 inch = 362 feet 1/31/2014 Page 30 Page 31 irvrol""' DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS APPLICANT: PROPERTY ADDRESS: ZONING/GUIDED: 60 -DAY DEADLINE: 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota•heights.com February 25, 2014 Planning Commission Nolan Wall, AICP Planner Planning Case 2014-05 Subdivision Request for Lot Split Jerry Trooien/Alden & Joyce Landreville 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway R-1 One Family Residential/LR Low Density Residential April 5, 2014 DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The applicant, on behalf of the property owner, is seeking approval to subdivide the existing parcel at 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway into two parcels. The request requires City approval before being recorded with Dakota County. BACKGROUND The subject parcel is 5 acres and contains a single-family residential dwelling. In addition, it is zoned R-1 and guided for low density residential development. The applicant has entered into a contract to purchase the entire subject parcel. If the lot split request is approved and recorded, the existing dwelling would remain and an additional single-family dwelling would be constructed on the new parcel with a shared driveway access onto Sibley Memorial Highway. ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan The subject parcel is guided LR, Low Density Residential in the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The applicant's request to subdivide the subject parcel into two parcels, consisting of 3.41 acres and 1.63 acres, is consistent with the LR maximum density of 2.9 units per acre. R-1 One -Family Zoning District Title 11-3-2 of the Code (Subdivision Ordinance) allows the subdivision of parcels, provided that the resulting lots are compliant with the requirements of the applicable zoning district. According to the minor subdivision map included as part of the application submittal, and shown in the table below, both proposed parcels meet the R-1 lot standards. In addition, the proposed lot split does not create any nonconformities with the existing improvements on Parcel A. Page 32 *measurements based on proposed 4,000 sq. ft. building pad as shown on minor subdivision map Critical Area Overlay District The subject parcel is located entirely within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area. The applicant was made aware of additional planning applications and building permit requirements that would apply to the construction of any improvements on Parcel B in the future, including a critical area permit. Title 12- 3-14 of the Code requires a new subdivision in the Critical Area Overlay District to demonstrate a building area that is consistent with the underlying zoning district on grades less than 18%. As a result, the minor subdivision map includes a potential 4,000 square foot building pad for a future single-family dwelling that meets the setback and slope requirements. Shared Driveway As previously noted, Parcel B would share access with the existing 10 -foot wide bituminous, gated driveway serving Parcel A for approximately 450 feet. Due to the slope of the land between the highway and the existing dwelling on Parcel A, a new driveway access to eliminate the proposed shared access with Parcel B would require significant land disturbance and additional permitting to be accomplished in compliance with City standards. In addition, MnDOT would have to allow access onto Sibley Memorial Highway and prefers to limit additional access points due to safety concerns. The City has approved subdivisions utilizing shared driveways in the past. However, the City is aware of, and has become involved in, conflicts resulting from shared driveways among private property owners. In an effort to alleviate some of the City's concerns, the applicant has provided a copy of the proposed declaration of driveway easement and covenants as part of the application submittal. If the lot split and necessary permits are approved for construction of an additional dwelling on Parcel B, the Fire and Police Departments and property owners need to reach an agreement for shared access through the existing gate and any other fire protection issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the subdivision request with the following conditions: 1. Park dedication fee in the amount of $2,700, in lieu of land, is collected after City Council approval and before issuance of any additional permits by the City. 2. Connection charges for sanitary sewer and water main shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall submit a critical area permit application prior to any applicable improvements on Parcel B. 4. The applicant shall dedicate 10 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the front property lines and 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the rear property lines to be denoted on the map submitted to Dakota County. Standard Parcel A Parcel B Lot Area 15,000 sq. ft. (0.34 acres) 148,539.6 sq. ft. (3.41 acres) 71,002.8 sq. ft. (1.63 acres) Lot Width 100 ft. 152.35 ft. 229.61 ft. Front Yard Setback 30 ft. 102.1 ft. (dwelling) 30 ft. (garage) 240 ft.* Side Yard Setback 10 ft. (up to 15' depending on structure height) 60 ft./145 ft. (dwelling) 34.8 ft./230 ft. (garage) 20.2 ft./75 ft.* Rear Yard 30 ft. or 20% of the avg. lot depth (whichever is greater) 180 ft. 90 ft.* *measurements based on proposed 4,000 sq. ft. building pad as shown on minor subdivision map Critical Area Overlay District The subject parcel is located entirely within the Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area. The applicant was made aware of additional planning applications and building permit requirements that would apply to the construction of any improvements on Parcel B in the future, including a critical area permit. Title 12- 3-14 of the Code requires a new subdivision in the Critical Area Overlay District to demonstrate a building area that is consistent with the underlying zoning district on grades less than 18%. As a result, the minor subdivision map includes a potential 4,000 square foot building pad for a future single-family dwelling that meets the setback and slope requirements. Shared Driveway As previously noted, Parcel B would share access with the existing 10 -foot wide bituminous, gated driveway serving Parcel A for approximately 450 feet. Due to the slope of the land between the highway and the existing dwelling on Parcel A, a new driveway access to eliminate the proposed shared access with Parcel B would require significant land disturbance and additional permitting to be accomplished in compliance with City standards. In addition, MnDOT would have to allow access onto Sibley Memorial Highway and prefers to limit additional access points due to safety concerns. The City has approved subdivisions utilizing shared driveways in the past. However, the City is aware of, and has become involved in, conflicts resulting from shared driveways among private property owners. In an effort to alleviate some of the City's concerns, the applicant has provided a copy of the proposed declaration of driveway easement and covenants as part of the application submittal. If the lot split and necessary permits are approved for construction of an additional dwelling on Parcel B, the Fire and Police Departments and property owners need to reach an agreement for shared access through the existing gate and any other fire protection issues. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the subdivision request with the following conditions: 1. Park dedication fee in the amount of $2,700, in lieu of land, is collected after City Council approval and before issuance of any additional permits by the City. 2. Connection charges for sanitary sewer and water main shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. The applicant shall submit a critical area permit application prior to any applicable improvements on Parcel B. 4. The applicant shall dedicate 10 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the front property lines and 5 -foot wide drainage and utility easements along the rear property lines to be denoted on the map submitted to Dakota County. Page 33 5. The applicant shall submit grading and utility plans and a dimensioned site plan with associated easements, subject to review and approval by the City Engineering Department as part of any building permit application. 6. The shared access easement agreement must be agreed to by both property owners, and signed, notarized, and recorded against both properties prior to the issuance of a building permit. 7. Any land disturbance activities must be in compliance with the City's Land Disturbance Guidance document. 8. The applicant works with the Fire and Police Departments to ensure access to the gate securing the shared driveway prior to any construction on Parcel B. ACTION REQUESTED 1. Recommend approval of the subdivision request, based on the finding of facts, with conditions. OR 2. Recommend denial of the subdivision request, based on the finding of fact that the proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City Code. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1. Findings of Fact 2. Aerial Site Map 3. Planning Application, including supporting materials Page 34 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Subdivision Request for Lot Split 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed request: 1. The newly -created parcel meets the R-1 One Family Residential Zoning District standards for lot area and width. 2. The newly -created parcel will have adequate building area for a conforming single-family dwelling within the Critical Area Overlay Zoning District and without the need for setback variances. 3. The proposed lot split will not create any nonconformities with the existing parcel and improvements. 4. The proposed shared driveway is necessary to allow access to the newly -created parcel without creating an additional access onto a State Highway. [WI ./krar+1‘ Czar•,= j ikzda:. g2i[]!it$. 1.1W F,:;1,4:?1357 441Jt;•? {:;F.4 +.8 aJ .3>' GHTS APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Office Use Only: Case it 2,9 / L c 5� Application Date: 2-1 Applicable Ordinance #: 1/ Existing Zoning: g " t Fee Paid: Staff Initials: C �� Existing Use: S Section: 2 - Proposed Zoning: Proposed Use: fZ Property Address/Street Location: (' Y v46'evt,ti+4 Applicant Name: ( -Y t Aria' Ey,/ Phone: tom- - Z - Applicant E -Mail Address: 1G P-7 "7 --A coW Applicant Mailing Address: trt" 5,\k. 1 v1o>n q1- >4w>1 Property Owner Name;ALI N.t• Toy<,k I-iv„rJw.UrLk' Phone: + 2- ‘9 -S qC Property Owner Mailing Address: \ o ao 5t IroL f VA.61ntivrl.*' ) w y Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) 1 -dr 2. Alum: from -s— 0; o .7- - c i) +M , " e6+ -,e- d -i � Type of Request: 0 Rezoning 0 Variance ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Wetlands Permit O Subdivision Approval D Critical Area Permit O Code Amendment Lot Split ❑ Conditional Use Permit for PUD ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval Q Comprehensive Plan Amendment O Other I hereby declare that all statements made in this request and on the additional material are true. 1 further authorize City Officials and agents to inspect the above property during 'daylight hours_ Signature of Wcant Date nature of Owner Date O,2-11PM Signature of Owner (if more than one) Planning Application (modified 1/26/2014) Date Page 1 of 1 Page 35 Page 36 Feb. 5, 2014 Members of the Planning Commission City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Re: 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway, Mendota Heights, MN ("Property") Ladies and Gentlemen:' Enclosed for your review and approval are the following: 1. Application together with a check for the $350 application fee; 2. Survey of minor subdivision ("Survey"); 3. Draft of a proposed Declaration of Driveway Easements and Covenants ("Easement'). I have entered into a contract to purchase the Property with an expected closing in February. Upon consummation of the purchase, I would like to subdivide the Property into two separate parcels as shown on the Survey as Parcel A and Parcel B. Upon separation of the parcels, I am considering two options. First,`I could retain fee title to the proposed Parcel A and sell the proposed Parcel B to an owner that has the intent to build a single family residence on such parcel. Alternatively, I would sell the improved Parcel A and construct a new home for my family on Parcel B. The Easement will allow for the shared access and maintenance of the driveway to both parcels. The driveway already exists and there will be littledisturbance to the nature beauty of the two parcels as a result of the lot split. There is some obvious benefit to me and my family if the subdivision is approved. I believe the City will also benefit from the additional housing and tax base that will be generated from the new home to be constructed. It is understood that if the subdivision of the Property is approved, other approval processes such as building permits and the like will be required. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. If you have further questions; please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Enclosures k/2286.06 -city letter erald L. Trooien Page 37 Page 38 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Planning Case 2014-05 Date: 2/19/2014 0 140 SCALE IN FEET City of Mendota Heights GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. Page 39 M INOI SUBDIVISION for GERALD TROOIEN ft•ofu 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Mendota Heights, MN EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision No. 2, except that portion taken by the State of Minnesota for highway purposes. PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPITONS PARCEL A That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION N0. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right—of—way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL B That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right—of—way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described parcel. PROPOSES INGRESS, EGRESS ANS UTILITY EASEMENT See Easement Exhibit for proposed easement descriptions prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated 2-7-14. NOTES Ar gl Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 01/13/14. Property ID No. 27-03700-08-010. Bearings shown are on Dakota County Coordinate System and the breakdown of Section 23 was done in accordance with the county surveyor's records as of this date. Curb shots are taken at the top and back of curb. Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% chance flood plain), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 27037C0019E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date December 2, 2011. This survey was prepared based upon Title Commitment File No. 414389, prepared by Land Title, Inc., issuing agents for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, dated January 1, 2014. Due to field work being completed during the winter season there may be improvements in addition to those shown that were not visible due to snow and ice conditions characteristic of Minnesota winters. X 952.36 OHW E GAS EST.1911 www.egrud.com LEGEND DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 DAKOTA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE HYDRANT POWER POLE EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL FROM DAKOTA COUNTY WEB SITE. DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE HIID SONS, INC. Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TWP. 28, RNG. 23 NORTH / / / / / / 80631 EBI / OHW / / 805.99 \EBIT OHW OHW �` 80674 EBIT / / 806 62 / 0• %- OFT+-BITDRIVE / <5.10 806.62 OP5 M / / / C4 1') 0. 806,63I' 1 1A`,o1:• •:4,xp5 / ��• C4°. • 4�� o +N9' r of e`,P' c .9 0 `61ti y �� AA I� SERV?/ QO MH_' TI�14`�' .tsV / DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NO SCALE) / 7 806.80 FNDIP.5 3.9 FEET WEST OF LOT LINE / / / / < ^L / 7 805.63 EBIT / / / 7 i / / // / 0P� C / // N 00 \\Avvvvvvvvvv0\��I 00000000000000000000000000000000000� \00.<' ,NO \O EBIT -sge° 806.5ti, EBIT / • /20, 824.40 812.85 's NDRWMO#J 825:57•.. 1� 0A 15 —"POINT A" .x 826.51 1ci ti/ i/ 81'24 54:14 lI A D.' x 827.33' 826.06 ASH8 • SENSOR 825.83 826.50 OAK1 5 / / 827.09 ASH 0 ,1 825.39 CLEANOUT x.827:97 / - sk6TH' LINE DF "82 I AOyrRNfv1EN4 0,4/ ,;,-// , 'j 41/ -��J� // /\'‘. f. � 0 835,95 7 IP. 5(:51_11;a6c 887.00.• 807.19 EBIT 826.55 /GL9M8 AASH10 CHE_ _ OFNDJLM//9 1 828.72 MAPLE1 2 • • • • • • x 829.81 NORTH .L. OF N 1.,/•4* SW1 /4 .. EC.23—T28N—R23W 82x9.45 •PRUCE30FT x 831.28 x 831.81 832 834. O� k9.OJ 83 0 „e .*. T1AL WATER% R' RV10E,k cA •N,-==-�= • 35 70 'J 835 g6TREE14 ELM9 ��; TR5E14 83819 TREE14 '4 AS x 833 835.6 0 804 .836 836.7156 a x 838.61 REE15 837.07 836.84 837 39 9 x 834.53 x83556 40 ASH9 83 63 ••.$ 607714 .•' 6 '38.20...•• ' B42.14. x.8.43.82 AS%18 """ ASH9 I a40 45, CO O � 841.45 "! FNDIP9235 3.4 FEET WEST D OF LOT LINE 845'88. FN D 3 /8Psr E 0.1 FEET,WES OF. LOT LME 63 rn 4> 4� ��838 7 / 840/4 L 840.8 120.00 840.63 d- 7 di - c w N �z0O oz 840.69 a X 842 27 841. kik 4 ... ASH10 8 i•_ 4 .• x 843 65x 845 89 0 � 845 28 .851846.8052 RE511 850 55 TRE 8 •••••• 849 31 TREE8-_- .... 85213 x 4Z9 5y i P669 853.46 / REE11 849$/•� .853.32 / 3s 49 34 ';�EE19 857 50 x854 05 849.55 BOX9-2 S"R E,�F THE 9 849 94 853.5- 844 9 1 "'TR6E8 .....84913 ASH8 8491 ••• 4/,, ASH8 5440 8445 80714 842 08 ELM7 845 13 5� IP r -- -B46.... BOX10 ASH9 *.- 8.4784645 18 84 846 90 ....1,•••••8850-•••850eoxi11. 2 llI 852 2 /_8. RE '854..32 TREE9 84 CL 841:.41 �SPRUEF t 845 47 . TREE12 O • 52 ANOUT 0O 844.202 S86°05'27 E 57,81 x 839 x 839 06 83867 840 16 01 LEANOUT • ,a� x84840 65 850.22 849 85 849 03 TREE11 TR.EE11 846.62 MFT 84610 TREE1 �yP . .'4915 TREE1......47:89 8.0% 847.72 BOX13 845 51 BOX1047 4 EE11 _ 4110 85\.6 CHE5 54 ASH 3 854 x854.38 x855 38 855.20 BOX16�. K I x 828.94 x 830.25 x 834,11 .x.839 ..0 ............... 840.27 853.64855.39 414 �. CHELM17 855.26.- - OX11 855. 851.99 850.19 852. . x x 851.21 • . 848 ' 850...•46 549 66 PROPOSED Aox••••.• E,1021 0 84821.012 4,00us.r.47 54 846 PAD 846 49 X 844.. PROPOSED 3 FOOT HIGH RETAINING WALL AS NEEDED. \._.. ...842..841.42_. w 841.73 °838 70 1111 538.91 x 838.88 x 842.10 SPRUCE:302T' 542' 842 47 ael cP 543 03 841,26 SPRUCE 5FT 843 80 844 90 842 05 844 17 GA 46 26 841.16 OLDFENPOST 0.4 FEET WEST OF LOT LINE 804.09 87 96 870 4 868 80 842.00 \\:13. 12 84 846 88 PARCEL B 1.63 ACRES >MORE OR LESS 842 09 84,20 x 843 58 x 847 20 849 37 • x 853 00 x 853 27 179.89 x 853 99 848 847 99 848 79 85.2 x 846 59 855.17 POTENTIAL ELECTRIC 84863 621\48 -0' TO BE SERVICED FROM NEIGHBORING OVERHEAD 20.2 x 857 06 299 85525 . 8,54 7 858.31 858 57 OHW 63 LP 09 85326 oo 97 EX. 847 80 GARFLR 50 847.74 843/59 90 7 847 43 54857 848 71 FENbE LIE EAST \OF LO r 8785 8,55.74 VEN 96 iy89.49 BLOC 3, \---WLY EXTENSION OF TI'LlE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 20 & 21, BLOCK 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIG AREA COMPUTATIONS TOTAL AREA SITE AREA: 5.04± ACRES 2 PROPOSED SINGLE FAMILY LOTS DENSITY: 0.40 ± UNITS/ ACRE ZONING AND SETBACHS 40 PARCEL A 3.41 ACRES MORE OR LESS 296 64 844 96 FENCEEND OHW -01 1.6 85/.591 03 OF/LOT ONE / x 858 19 iozt co Co 0 CID r9 CL CD CV LI -I CD Z CD ▪ 0 Ld ▪ Ld LLI /12 NO EASEMENT PROVIDED FOR OVERHEAD LINES 857.78 FNDPNCH .6 FEET EAST OF LOT LINE 857 89 51.2 ENCEVDP 850 2 FENC COP 20 FEN ---TI-L-SEN'S-HrGFEAND- HEIGHTS GRAPHIC SCALE 40 80 AT /3 860 95 60 53 ENCECOR 860.78 NE CORNER OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3, FEN TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 160 BENCHMARN MNDOT STATION NAME: BRONCO ELEVATION = 801.26 (NAVD88) CURRENT ZONING IS R-1 — ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT PROPOSED ZONING IS R-1 — ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FRONT SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACK REAR SETBACK DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM LOT AREA 15,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET MAXIMUM HEIGHT 25 FEET 30 FEET 10 FEET OR 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE CONTIGUOUS TO THE SIDE YARD, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, TO A MAX OF 15 FEET. 30 FEET OR 20% OF THE AVERAGE LOT DEPTH, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. ZONE R-1 (ONE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JA UD 2-07-74 License No. 41578 DRAWN BY: JEN JOB NO: 14010PP DATE: 1-21-14 CHECK BY: JER SCANNED 1 1-30-14 Added Descriptions JEN 2 2-07-14 Removed Prop. Ease. Desc. JEN NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY Page 40 EASEMENT EXHIBIT for GERALD TROOIEN ft•ofu 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway Mendota Heights, MN PROPOSED INCRESS, ECRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL A A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line, a distance of 37.00 feet; thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 161.79 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 71.25 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 60.82 feet to the east line of the west 120.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence continuing South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West a distance of 30.39 feet; thence southerly a distance of 95.40 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 164.75 feet and a central angle of 33 degrees 10 minutes 41 seconds; thence South 86 degrees 05 minutes 27 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve, a distance of 57.81 feet to said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. PROPOSED INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL B A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT N0. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described property. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line, a distance of 37.00 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 161.79 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 71.25 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 60.82 feet; to the east line of the west 120.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on said southerly right of way line and said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. NOTES Ar gl Field survey was completed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 01/13/14. Property ID No. 27-03700-08-010. Bearings shown are on Dakota County Coordinate System and the breakdown of Section 23 was done in accordance with the county surveyor's records as of this date. This survey was prepared based upon Title Commitment File No. 414389, prepared by Land Title, Inc., issuing agents for Stewart Title Guaranty Company, dated January 1, 2014. Due to field work being completed during the winter season there may be improvements in addition to those shown that were not visible due to snow and ice conditions characteristic of Minnesota winters. For additional boundary information please refer to the Minor Subdivision prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., dated 2-7-14. OH W E GAS r � I I L J EST.1911 www.egrud.com LEGEND DENOTES DENOTES DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND AS LABELED IRON MONUMENT SET, MARKED RLS# 41578 DAKOTA COUNTY CAST IRON MONUMENT DENOTES SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES HYDRANT DENOTES POWER POLE DENOTES LIGHT POLE DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL DENOTES EXISTING 2 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL FROM DAKOTA COUNTY WEB SITE. DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE DENOTES UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE DENOTES UNDERGROUND GAS LINE DENOTES BITUMINOUS SURFACE HIID SONS, INC. Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 VICINITY MAP PART OF SEC. 23, TWP. 28, RNG. 23 b' bing Blas Rd C'9fP `' Rd OS Nina Ct 6arbara C ._ a an. _r: c:.- -.1, S 2. a v_k, / / DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NO SCALE) 7 7 806.80 FNDIP.5 3.9 FEET WEST OF LOT LINE / / 7 7 7 7 7 / NORTH/ / / / / / / CBs OHW / rs <" / / / / / / / // / // / ‘$ fj•• ,'51'4. 445t. 444 ,k -AD er. •� 14p 1./ / OHW / N -b 110 o / of \y" / 1�QO 812.85 NDRWMOAI 154 AI foe CS co V4,• Ai*ft 40� IP. S$OLID OE 9 „- ,-- 4\54(?'Nx 14) of1^�e� F,�'' RS cL,aF 1" I0 N zz 4`0 841.45 FNDIP9235 3.4 FEET WES4 •-•-•C OF LOT LINE 845'08. FN D 3 /SP4P E 0.1 FEET,WES OF. LOT L11�1E LO CO S00°09'38"IY / / < I 840 rn 01 s '120.00 _ti W \J cP o 0.4 FEET WEST OF LOT LINE • / V 41 ifr 444 fr ENSOR to "POINT A" KI $�0831.46 _ •FNDJLM#9 /NORTH .L. E OF N1.,/•4'=SW1 /4 .. EC.23-T28N-R23W 832 834. 836 858 840 842 844 r 846 ... 1 848 850..........•.. •••,.... 852 854 it S86°0: 57,81 GAS; 844 PROPOSED 3 FOOT HIGH RETAINING WALL AS NEEDED. 8427 .. _ N :W W oz� z•Q•. I - �WN•. $ 854 N CO N EN M oi co 5 r POTENTIAL ELECTRIC -0" TO BE SERVICED FROM 20 z NEIGHBORING OVERHEAD 0 29% OHW cP cr 838.70 AS S89'49'37"W 842 7, 844 01 179.89 0 852 :• -- ;34.8 cqs 1 co rn 63 (3901 11856.11 OF/LOT ONE / co co 0 CL CD 0 CD Li I FENbE LIE EAST \OF LO TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIG TS PLAT 3 WLY EXTENSION OF TI'LlE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 20 & 21, BLOCK 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 40 PARCEL A 0 • (73 296 64 OHW -A- NORTH LINE OF LOT5..-21i & 21 BL6CK --TI-L-SEWS-FITGFEAND" HEIGHTS AT /3 Or AMU 20 GRAPHIC SCALE 40 80 /12 • 160 BENCHMARN MNDOT STATION NAME: BRONCO ELEVATION = 801.26 (NAVD88) EASEMENT AREAS EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL A (3,670 S.F.) Ll_711 EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL B (5,877 S.F.) • NO EASEMENT PROVIDED FOR OVERHEAD LINES 857.78 FNDPNCH .6 FEET EAST OF LOT LINE 860.78 FNDJLM#8 NE CORNER OF LOT 21, BLOCK 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. JA Date: UD 2-07-74 License No. 41578 DRAWN BY: JEN JOB NO: 14010PP DATE: 2-07-14 CHECK BY: JER SCANNED 2 .3 NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY Page 41 DECLARATION OF DRIVEWAY EASEMENTS AND COVENANTS THIS GRANT is made this day of , 2014, by Gerald L. Trooien ("Trooien"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Trooien is the owner of a parcel of real property in Dakota County, Minnesota legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference ("Parcel A"); WHEREAS, Trooien is also the owner of the real property in Dakota County, Minnesota, appurtenant to Parcel A and legally described on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference ("Parcel B"); WHEREAS, Trooien desires to reserve and declare perpetual, non-exclusive driveway easements -over portions of -Parcel Aand-Parcel-B: AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration and in consideration of the covenants contained herein, it is agreed as follows: 1. Easements. (a) Trooien hereby declares for the owner(s) of Parcel A, its successors and assigns, forever, a perpetual, nonexclusive driveway easement, for easement ingress and egress, together with an electrical utility easement for the purpose of providing power for the lighting of and gate access to such driveway, over, under, across and through that portion of Parcel B legally Page 42 described and depicted on Exhibit C attached hereto ("Parcel A Driveway Easement"). Said easement is for the use and benefit of Parcel A by the owner(s) of Parcel A, their tenants, and their respective guests, servants, agents, representatives, licensees and invitees for the purposes specified and shall be appurtenant to Parcel A. (b) Trooien hereby declares for the owner(s) of Parcel B, its successors and assigns, forever, a perpetual, nonexclusive driveway easement, ingress and egress, over, across and through that portion of Parcel A legally described and depicted on Exhibit D attached hereto ("Parcel B Driveway Easement"). Said easement is for the use and benefit of Parcel B by the owner(s) of Parcel B, their tenants, and their respective guests, servants, agents, representatives, licensees and invitees for the purposes specified and shall be appurtenant to Parcel B. 2. Maintenance and Operation. With respect to the Parcel A Driveway Easement and Parcel B Driveway Easement (collectively, the "Driveway Easements") described in Section 1(a) and (b), the owner(s) of Parcel A shall be responsible for keeping such easement area properly maintained, in good repair, suitable for its intended use and in accordance with all applicable laws and ordinances. In addition, the owner(s) of Parcel A shall keep the Parcel A Driveway Easement lighted. Said maintenance shall include snow removal, surface repairs, and as to the Parcel A Driveway Easement only, lights and the electrical gate controlling access to the Driveway Easements. The owner(s) of Parcel A shall submit a written proposal to the owner(s) of Parcel B for any work to be performed on the Driveway Easements in excess of $ ("Work Proposal"). In the event the owner(s) of Parcel B objects to the Work Proposal, the owner(s) of Parcel B has ( _) days from receipt of the Work Proposal to provide written notice to the owner(s) of Parcel A of such objections ("Objection Notice"). In the event a controversy or dispute arises between the owners involving the Work Proposal, the owners shall make their best efforts in good faith to settle and resolve the dispute through negotiations or mediation. Anysuch-controversy-ordispute which cannot be so -resolved shall -be -finally and conclusively settled by the City Engineer for the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, an expert appointed by the City Engineer or an alternative arbitrator agreed by the owners ("Arbitrator") following written submissions to the Arbitrator by each of the respective owners within sixty (60) days after receipt of the Objection Notice. The decision of the Arbitrator after review of written submissions shall be binding and not subject to judicial review. Each of the owners shall bear one-half of the costs of fees charged by the Arbitrator. The owner(s) of Parcel B shall reimburse the owner(s) of Parcel A for fifty percent (50%) of all costs of operation, maintenance, electrical utility, repair and replacement costs within thirty (30) days of receiving an invoice for such costs. In the event the owner(s) of Parcel B fails to fund its portion of maintenance and operation costs as provided herein, then the owner(s) of Parcel A shall have a lien on the fee title to Parcel B to the extent of such unpaid costs as certified by an affidavit filed in the real 2 Page 43 estate records for Parcel B. Such lien may be foreclosed in the same manner as a real estate mortgage under Minnesota Statues Chapter 580. Upon request of the owner(s) of Parcel B, the owner(s) of Parcel A shall certify in writing to the owner(s) of Parcel B or its mortgagee whether or not the owner(s) of Parcel B is in compliance with the requirements of this Section 2. 3. Indemnification. The owner(s) of Parcel A and the owner(s) of Parcel B, their successors, assigns, and transferees, hereby agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the other party, its successors and assigns, from any liability, personal injury or damage of any nature whatsoever which shall or may occur by reason of the use of the Driveway Easements granted herein by either party, their agents, guests and invitees. 4. Notices. Any notice, demand, statement and request required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and be deemed to have been properly given or served when personally delivered to, or two days after deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, and addressed at the address set forth below: Gerald Trooien: Mendota Heights, MN At such time that Trooien conveys Parcel A or Parcel B so as to create a new party in interest, such new party in interest shall send notice to the other parties of the name and address to which notice to the new party shall be sent or delivered. 5. Insurance. The owner(s) of Parcel A and the owner(s) of Parcel B hereto agree to purchase and maintain commercial general liability insurance in a commercially reasonable amount no less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) and written on an "occurrence" basis insuring the easement areas granted herein and any use thereof in accordance with this Agreement.._ 6. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by, and only by, a written agreement signed by the owner(s) of Parcel A, the owner(s) of Parcel B, or their successors in interest, as the case may be. 7. Covenants to Run With Land. The terms and provisions of this Declaration shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. The covenants and easements herein created and contained in this Declaration shall be considered covenants running with the land. 8. Termination. This Declaration may not be terminated except by a recorded instrument duly executed by the owner(s) of Parcel A and the owner(s) of Parcel B. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the party hereto has hereunto executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. Gerald L. Trooien STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2014 by Gerald L. Trooien, a single individual. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Christoffel & Elliott, P.A. 1111 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55101 k/2286.06 -driveway easement Notary Public 4 Page 44 Page 45 EXHIBIT A Legal Description — Parcel A The real estate situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, described as follows: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the south-westerly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. 5 Page 46 EXHIBIT B Legal Description — Parcel B The real estate situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, described as follows: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along. the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19- 115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; - thence North 89 degrees49minutes 37 - ..._ seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described parcel. 6 Page 47 EXHIBIT C Parcel A Driveway Easement A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence -South 00 -degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, -along saidwest- line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line, a distance of 37.00 feet; thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 161.79 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 71.25 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 Page 48 second West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 60.82 feet to the east line of the west 120.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence continuing South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West a distance of 30.39 feet; thence southerly a distance of 95.40 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 164.75 feet and a central angle of 33 degrees 10 minutes 41 seconds; thence South 86 degrees 05 minutes 27 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve, a distance of 57.81 feet to said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. 8 Page 49 EXHIBIT D Parcel B Driveway Easement A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19- 115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381 -.96 -feet to the-west-linee-of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; -- thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described property. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line, a distance of 37.00 feet to the 9 Page 50 point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 161.79 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 71.25 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 60.82 feet; to the east Zine of the west 120.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on said southerly right of way line and said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. 10 Page 51 MINOR SUBDIVISION For Gerald Trooien of 1010 Sibley Memorial Highway February 7, 2014 EXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision No. 2, except that portion taken by the State of Minnesota for highway purposes. PROPOSED PARCEL DESCRIPTIONS: PARCEL A That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. PARCEL B That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Page 52 Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described parcel. PROPOSED INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL A A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: The west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the following described property: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension Page 53 of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line, a distance of 37.00 feet; thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 161.79 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 71.25 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 60.82 feet to the east line of the west 120.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence continuing South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West a distance of 30.39 feet; thence southerly a distance of 95.40 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 164.75 feet and a central angle of 33 degrees 10 minutes 41 seconds; thence South 86 degrees 05 minutes 27 seconds East, not tangent to last described curve, a distance of 57.81 feet to said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. PROPOSED INGRESS, EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT ACROSS PARCEL B A 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes over, under and across that part of the following described property: That part of Lot 8, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 2, Dakota County, Minnesota, more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and that part of Government Lot 3, all in Section 23, Township 28 North, Range 23 West, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, Dakota County, Minnesota, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 7; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along the north line of Lots 20 and 21, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 296.64 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 21, Block 3, as evidenced by Judicial Landmark No. 8; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of Lots 23 thru 31, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3, a distance of 707.98 feet to Judicial Landmark No. 9; thence continuing North 00 degrees 16 minutes 49 seconds East, along the west line of said Lot 31, Block 3, a distance of 141.16 feet to the southerly right-of-way line of State Trunk Highway No. 13 per MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-115, Dakota County, Minnesota and to a point hereinafter referred to as "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line and the southwesterly extension of said southerly right of way line, a distance of 381.96 feet to the west line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 09 minutes 38 seconds West, along said west line of the Page 54 Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, a distance of 615.55 feet to the westerly extension of said northerly line of Lot 20, Block 3, TILSEN'S HIGHLAND HEIGHTS PLAT 3; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 37 seconds East, along said westerly extension of the north line of Lot 20, Block 3, a distance of 2.45 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT, the west 120.00 feet and the south 385.00 feet of the above described property. The centerline of said easement is described as follows: Commencing at the aforementioned "Point A"; thence South 52 degrees 07 minutes 42 seconds West, along said southerly right of way line, a distance of 37.00 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence South 26 degrees 57 minutes 33 seconds West a distance of 161.79 feet; thence southwesterly a distance of 71.25 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 300.00 feet and a central angle of 13 degrees 36 minutes 28 seconds; thence South 40 degrees 34 minutes 01 second West, tangent to said curve, a distance of 60.82 feet; to the east line of the west 120.00 feet of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter and said centerline there terminating. The sidelines of said easement are to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on said southerly right of way line and said east line of the west 120.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter. Page 55 Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota •SS County of Dakota ANNE THILLEN , being duly sworn, on oath, says that he/she is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as SOUTH-WEST REVIEW , and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printedNOTICE OF HEARING which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on SUNDAY , the 9TH day of FEBRUARY , 2014 , and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including , the day of , 20 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: *ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ *ABCDEFGH IJKLMNOPQRSTUV WXYZ *abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn to before me on t ;s 10TH day of FEBRUARY , 2 4 Notary Public BY: TITLE LEGAL COORDINATOR *Alphabet should be in the same size and kind of type as the notice. TONYA R. WHITEHEAD Notary Public -Minnesota My Commission Expiras Jan 31, 2015 RATE INFORMATION (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space $25.00 per col. inch (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter $25.00 per col. inch (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter $ per col. inch 1/14 Page 56 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR LOT SPLIT AT 1010 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commis§ion of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, February 25, 2014 in the City. Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider an application from Jerry Trooien and Alden and Joyce Landreville to split the lot currently identified as AUDITORS SUBDIVISION NO 2, ALL OF LOT 8 (PID# 27-03700-08- 010). This request has been assigned Planning Case number.'', 2014-05. This notice is pursuant to Title 11 (Subdivision), Chapter] 2 of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this meeting. Lorri Smith City Clerk- (South-West Review: Feb. 9, 2014) Planning Case 2014-05 - Public Hearing Notice Map (page 1) 15 9 17 i 2 18 277640100050 a 1648 JAMES RD AIMEE & PATRICK ALDRICH 277640203250 1645 JAMES RD ALAN R & PATRICIA L ANDERSON 277640100020 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 270230052070 1680 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS RD CLIFFORD & PATRICIA BOLIN 270370008010 277640100040 1010 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Ca 1640 JAMES RD ALDEN E LANDREVILLE DANIEL C & MELISSA B BROWN 277640203320 Op ALTON C & SANDRA M TODD 277640203330 0 991 CAREN CT ALTON C & SANDRA M TODD 277640203180 co 1012 JAMES CT DANIEL W & RUTH A FRAM 277640203280 992 CAREN CT DAREN & BARBORA CARLSON 277640100060 274750000063 O 1652 JAMES RD 0 1037 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS LN AMY K WILSON DAVID E ELLIS 277640203170 277640203260 0 1008 JAMES CT 1639 JAMES RD ANGELA & TIMOTHY GALLANT DAVID T TSTE DINGER 277640100070 277640203240 O 1660 JAMES RD 1651 JAMES RD ANN L & JACK FECHT DONALD C & JANIS 5 TWEEDY 277640203270 277640203290 0 1631 JAMES RD 0 996 CAREN CT ANNE C GARNER GEORGE JR & MAXINE BERGH 274750000010 274750000070 x 1040 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY 1041 HAYFIELD HEIGHTS LN BEVERLY VANDENBERG SARGENT GERALD C & KAREN L T BREN Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. Map Scale 1 inch = 503 feet 2/4/2014 Page 57 Planning Case 2014-05 - Public Hearing Notice Map (page 2) 21, 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 277640203190 1016 JAMES CT HAROLD & MAXINE S SLOBOF 270230051010 1020 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY JAMES P WICKER 274750000030 0 1650 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS RD MAURICE U LAZARUS 277640203230 1657 JAMES RD MICHAEL E & MARGARET GIBBS 274750000040 274750000050 1034 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS LN 0 1030 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS LN JUDY M BROWN MICHELLE PAULINE HOFFMAN 277640203210 270230052093 1015 JAMES CT 0 1666 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS RD KATHERINE D TSTE GOLDMAN PATRICK G ZIMMERMAN 277640203310 KENNETH & CAMILLA HERRMANN 277640100090 1678 JAMES RD PAUL D & LACEY L STEELE 277640203300 277640100030 995 CAREN CT 0 1636 JAMES RD KENNETH A & CAMILLA HERRMANN ROBERT B MARTIN 277640100080 1670 JAMES RD USA M & MICHAEL D DONOHOO 270230051020 1028 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY LUCILLE T MOORE 274750000021 1646 MAYFIELD HEIGHTS RD MARK 5 JOHNSON 240370006041 982 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY MATTHEW & MARC WELSCH 277640203160 1687 JAMES RD ROBERT 3 & LEAH A HENDERSON 277640203211 1011 JAMES CT ROBIN C REED 270230051030 0 1032 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY RONALD A & CYNTHIA 3 FURCHNER 277640203220 0 1665 JAMES RD THOMAS 5 & KELLEY STONEBURNER Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning verification. Dakota County assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. Map Scale 1 inch = 503 feet 2/4/2014 Page 58 Page 59 7c irvrol""' CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www.mendota•heights.com DATE: February 25, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Nolan Wall, AICP Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case 2014-03 Code Amendment for Electronic Display Signage APPLICANT: City of Mendota Heights PROPERTY ADDRESS: N/A ZONING/GUIDED: N/A 60 -DAY DEADLINE: N/A DESCRIPTION OF THE REQUEST The City is considering an amendment to Title 12-1D-15 of the City Code in order to allow electronic display signage for institutional uses in certain residential zoning districts. Currently, electronic display signs are only allowed for motor fuel stations. BACKGROUND As a result of the 2014 goal setting workshop, the City Council directed Staff to bring forward a city - initiated code amendment application to consider allowing electronic display signage for institutional uses in residential zoning districts. In 2005, a similar code amendment application to allow an electronic display sign at Henry Sibley High School was submitted as part of Planning Case 2005-13. In that case, the City Council affirmed its position that such signs are not allowed and adopted findings detailing concerns related to electronic signage in denial of the request. The proposed code amendment and Resolution 05-41 are attached for reference. In 2013, the City Council approved a variance and subsequent code amendment to allow electronic display signage for motor fuel stations under a number of conditions, as included in Title 12 -1D -15(I)(3). In addition, Convent of the Visitation recently applied for a similar code amendment as part of Planning Case 2014-01. As a result of the City's decision to consider similar amendments regarding electronic display signage, the application was subsequently withdrawn. Electronic display signs have been regulated to varying degrees throughout the metro area in recent years as the technology has improved and become more affordable. A comparison table detailing electronic display signage standards in other municipalities is attached for review. As the prevalence of this signage -type continues, it is important for the City to consider the potential impacts of allowing this technology for specific uses. Also attached are examples of electronic display signs for review. In an effort to promote transparency and collaboration in consideration of the potential code amendment, a letter with a copy of the DRAFT amendment was sent to all identified institutional uses meeting the proposed definition and within the R-1 and R -1A zoning districts. Comments received are attached for review and consideration. EXISTING CODE STANDARDS The City Code has the following references to these types of signs within residentially -zoned districts: 12 -1D -15(E): Prohibited Signs: Unless a sign is specifically permitted under this chapter, the sign is prohibited. By way of example and not by way of limitation, the following signs are specifically prohibited: 2. Illuminated flashing signs within the R, B-1 or B-2 district. 3. In all districts, illuminated signs or devices giving off an intermittent, steady or rotating beam consisting of a collection or concentration of rays or lights greater than two (2) square feet in area. 9. Animated signs, lighter than air inflatable devices, string lights, striplighting outlining structures, and signs attached or mounted on a vehicle parked primarily for use as a sign. In addition, for residentially -zoned land, nonresidential uses may have one nameplate sign at a maximum of 12 square feet. A second nameplate sign is allowed by conditional use permit with a number of conditions, as included in Title 12-1D-15(H)(3)(a). In order to accommodate electronic display signs for institutional uses within residential zoning districts, while limiting negative impacts to surrounding uses and the general public, consideration of amendments to the City Code are recommended. ANALYSIS As proposed in DRAFT Ordinance 460, electronic display signs would be allowed by conditional use permit for institutional uses in the R-1 and R -1A zoning districts. Institutional uses would be defined as "uses operated as schools, places of worship, or government facilities." The proposed definition is identical as to what was proposed in Planning Case 2005-13. Under that definition, the following uses would seem to qualify if able to meet the proposed conditions (see attached map for locations): • Henry Sibley High School 1897 Delaware Avenue • Friendly Hills Middle School 701 Mendota Heights Road • Mendota Elementary School 1979 Summit Lane • Somerset Elementary School 1355 Dodd Road • St. Thomas Academy 949 Mendota Heights Road • Convent of the Visitation 2455 Visitation Drive • Children's County Day School 1588 Victoria Road • Holy Family Maronite Church 1960 Lexington Avenue South • St. Peter's Church 1405 Sibley Memorial Highway • Beth Jacob Congregation 1179 Victoria Curve • St. Paul United Methodist Church 700 Wesley Lane • Mendota Heights United Church of Christ 680 Highway 110 • Acacia Park Cemetery 2151 Pilot Knob Road • Resurrection Cemetery 2101 Lexington Avenue South • Fire Hall 2121 Dodd Road • City Hall/Police Department 1101 Victoria Curve Page 60 Page 61 In addition, the following definition would be created for electronic display signs: SIGN, ELECTRONIC DISPLAY: A sign or portion thereof that displays electronic, non pictorial, text information in which each alphanumeric character is defined by a small number of matrix elements using different combinations of light emitting diodes (LEDs), fiber optics, light bulbs, or other illumination devices within the display area. Electronic display signs include computer programmable, microprocessor -controlled electronic displays. Electronic display signs commonly replace temporary handmade signs and changeable copy signs, both of which currently exist within the City. Conditions placed on electronic display signs are meant to mitigate any potential negative impacts while allowing property owners to utilize the latest signage technology to disseminate messages to users and the general public. However, this may raise enforcement issues for the City in the future. The proposed code amendment includes the following conditions and corresponding standards: Condition Standard Sign Area Not to exceed 100 square feet per surface Sign Height Not to exceed 9 feet from sign base Electronic Display Area Not to exceed 50% of total sign area, only one contiguous display area per surface Property Line Setback Distance 10 feet from external property lines, no closer than 50 feet from a surrounding residential property line Message Change Interval Not more than once/four hours, except for emergency warnings and time/temperature readings Hours of Operation 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. Message Characteristics Static letters and numbers only, no animation, video or audio, scrolling, flashing, twirling, fading, or color change Electronic Display Characteristics Black background, one -color font Font Size Minimum 4" in height or larger Message Limitations No off -premise messages Malfunction Settings Automatic turn-off when malfunction occurs or when notified by City of noncompliance Sign Aesthetics Monument -style, natural stone/brick/masonry base, and landscaping Brightness Not to exceed 0.3 foot-candles at a specified distance depending on the sign size, must be equipped with auto -adjust brightness settings Additional Signage Parcel 40+ acres, 300 -foot setback, screened from surrounding residential uses Sign Area Title 12 -1D -15(H)(3) of the Code allows one nameplate sign, not to exceed 12 square feet in area per surface, for each permitted use or use by conditional use permit other than residential. Nonresidential uses in residential zones are also allowed an additional nameplate sign, not to exceed 100 square feet in area per surface, by conditional use permit. The proposed code amendment would also include the same 100 square foot standard for electronic display signs. Sign Height Title 12-1D-15(H)(3)(a)(5) of the Code allows nonresidential uses in residential zones an additional nameplate sign up to 9 feet in height from the average natural grade at the base of the sign. The proposed code amendment would also include the same standard for electronic display signs. Page 62 Electronic Display Area In order to regulate the scale of the electronic display component, the proposed code amendment would limit the display's area to 50% of the sign's total area. Therefore, a sign constructed at the proposed maximum of 100 square feet could have an electronic display of 50 square feet per surface. In addition, only one contiguous display area would be allowed per surface. Property Line Setback Distance Title 12 -1D -15(H)(6) of the Code requires signs over one square foot in residential zoning districts to be set back at least 10 feet from any property line. The proposed code amendment would allow the same setback for electronic display signs; however the sign could not be closer than 50 feet from any surrounding residential property boundary lines. The intent of the additional setback standard is to mitigate potential negative impacts to surrounding property owners, which are most likely residential uses. In an effort to accommodate large institutional uses consisting of numerous contiguous parcels, the existing setback standard would be modified to reference the external property boundary lines. Message Change Interval The message change interval standard is intended to limit driver distraction while attempting to read and process information shown on an electronic display sign. While many factors can contribute to motor vehicle crashes, driver distraction can make an already complex roadway environment more dangerous. The proposed code amendment includes a message change interval of no more than once every four hours, with an exception for emergency warnings. Based on the proposed hours of operation, totaling 16 hours per day, an electronic display sign could change messages no more than 4 times per day. The Code allows no more than 3 text changes per day for electronic display signs at motor fuel stations. The proposed code amendment would allow time, date, and temperature readings to change independent of the static message without constituting a message change, but no more than once every 3 seconds. If the time and temperature reading is displayed alone, it would be subject to the proposed change interval. The City should consider whether the proposed message change interval standard is appropriate for institutional uses and is adequate to protect drivers from additional distraction and surrounding uses from negative impacts as a result of the changing message. A review of message change interval standards from other example ordinances indicates various regulation options for the City to consider. As included in the attached table, change intervals range from 5 seconds to once per day. It can be assumed the shorter change intervals most likely address commercial signage needs for advertising purposes along maj or roadways. Hours of Operation Title 12-1D-15(H)(3)(a)(10) of the Code allows additional nameplate signs for nonresidential uses in residential zoning districts to be lit from dusk to 12:00 midnight. The proposed code amendment would limit the hours of operation for an electronic display sign from 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. The City should consider whether the proposed hours of operation are adequate to mitigate any potential negative impacts to surrounding uses while still allowing the property owner reasonable use of the sign during necessary message display times. Message Characteristics The Code already prohibits flashing and animated signs. The proposed code amendment would only allow messages containing static letters and numbers. In addition, no portion of the message can contain audio or video, scroll, twirl, fade, or change color. These additional standards provide further protections against potential negative impacts that may cause distraction or are a public nuisance. Page 63 Electronic Display Characteristics The proposed code amendment would require the electronic display area to have a black background and messages with only one font color. The intent is to create a consistent look for electronic display signage in the City that does not contribute to driver distraction or cause a public nuisance. Font Size In an effort to maintain readability to limit unsafe conditions for drivers, the proposed code amendment would require letters or numbers to be at least 4 inches in height. Title 12-8-3 of the Code applies the same standard for building address numbers. Font size standards are not common in the example ordinance comparison provided in the attached table. The City should consider whether regulation of a message's font size is necessary. Message Limitations The proposed code amendment would limit messages to on -premise announcements and public service information. The intent in allowing institutional uses the opportunity to utilize electronic display signs is for promotion of events and announcements specific to the use and visitors to the property, not as a potential source of revenue for advertisement of off -premise services. Malfunction Settings The malfunction of an electronic display sign has the potential to cause added distractions to drivers and negative impacts to surrounding uses. The proposed code amendment would require the sign be shut-off when a malfunction occurs or upon notice to the property owner by the City of any noncompliance. Sign Aesthetics Title 12-1D-15(H)(3)(a)(8) and (9) of the Code require additional nameplate signs for nonresidential uses in residential zoning districts to be constructed as a monument sign with a stone or brick base and with landscaping around the sign structure. The proposed code amendment would also include the same standards for an electronic display sign. Brightness The proposed code amendment would require the electronic display sign to be equipped with a sensor that adjusts the brightness according to ambient light conditions. In addition, brightness would not be allowed to exceed the industry standard of 0.3 foot-candles from a preset distance depending on the sign size. Electronic display signs that are too bright can be ineffective and become a nuisance to the community. The City should consider whether the proposed standard is adequate to protect drivers from additional distraction and surrounding uses from additional light pollution from electronic display signs. Title 12- 1I-15 of the Code requires lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security purposes not to exceed readings of 0.2 foot-candles at the shared property line with a commercial or industrial use or public right of way, and zero foot-candles at the shared property line with residentially -zoned property. The City could consider a similar standard for electronic display signs. Additional Signage The City contains a number of institutional uses with significant acreage and numerous buildings spread across the property. In an effort to accommodate additional electronic display signage that is meant exclusively for internal users/visitors and is not visible from surrounding properties, the proposed code amendment would allow an additional sign under further conditions. As proposed, the sign would be Page 64 located on a parcel of at least 40 acres, limited to 50 square feet in size, set back at least 300 feet from any external property boundary line, and screened appropriately from surrounding residential uses. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the City desires to allow electronic display signage for institutional uses in residentially -zoned areas, while mitigating potential negative impacts to surrounding uses and the public, Staff recommends consideration of DRAFT Ordinance 460. As previously noted, there is a potential for increased enforcement efforts as a result of additional electronic display signage in the City. ACTION REQUESTED Following the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: 1. Recommend approval of DRAFT Ordinance 460 as presented, or as amended by the Commission, based on the findings of fact. OR 2. Recommend denial of DRAFT Ordinance 460, based on the findings of fact. OR 3. Table the request, pending additional information from staff or others. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW 1. Findings of Fact 2. DRAFT Ordinance 460 3. Electronic display sign standards comparison table 4. Example electronic display signs 5. Comments regarding proposed amendment 6. Planning Case 2005-13 DRAFT Code Amendment 7. Resolution 05-41 8. Institutional Uses within R-1 & R -1A Districts map Page 65 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL City Code Amendment Institutional Use Electronic Display Signage The following Findings of Fact are made in support of approval of the proposed request: 1. Electronic display signs may replace handmade temporary and changeable copy signs on institutional properties, resulting in a more attractive environment. 2. Limiting electronic display signs to institutional uses in the R-1 and R -1A Zoning Districts with substantial setbacks from surrounding properties will protect against proliferation of such signs. 3. Standards regarding the size of the sign structure and electronic display, message change interval, hours of operation, message characteristics, font size, off -premise advertising, malfunction settings, and brightness of electronic display signs will mitigate potential negative impacts to surrounding uses and the general public. Page 66 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL City Code Amendment Institutional Use Electronic Display Signage The following Findings of Fact are made in denial of the proposed request: 1. Electronic display signs in residential zoning districts will create a more retail/commercial appearance which does fit with the low density residential character of the community. 2. Electronic display signs can create distractions for drivers and endanger public safety. 3. Electronic display signs can create a nuisance to surrounding uses. 4. Electronic display signs can create issues for the City in enforcement of the Code regulations. 5. Proliferation of electronic display signs will negatively affect the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. 1101 Victoria Curve 1 Mendota Heights, MN 55118 651.452.1850 phone 1 651.452.8940 fax www,mendota-heights.com CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS. APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Office Use Only. Case #:'2014-03. Application Date:02.03.2014 Staff Initials: Applicable Ordinance #:' 12-1 D . Section:' 15 Existing NSA. Proposed Zoning: N/A Existing Use: N/A Proposed Use: N/A Fee Paid: N/A Property Address/Street Location: N/A Applicant Name: City of Mendota Heights Applicant E -Mail Address: nolanw@mendota-heights.com Applicant Mailing Address: 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Phone: 651.452.1850 Property Owner Name: N/A Property Owner Mailing Address: N/A Phone: N/A Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) N/A Type of Request: ❑ Rezoning ❑ Variance ❑ Subdivision Approval IN Code Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Wetlands Permit ❑ Critical Area Permit ❑ Lot Split ❑ Conditional Use Permit for PUD ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Other I hereby declare that all statements made in this re uest and on the additional material are true. I further authorize City Officials and agents to in s 6ct th:.b• iroperty during daylight hours. l / �vi 02.03.2014 SignWture oApplicant Date Signature of Owner Date Signature of Owner (if more than one) Planning Application (modified 1/28/2014) Date Page 1 of 1 Page 67 Page 68 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 460 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 12-1B-2 AND 12-1D-15 OF THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, DAKOTA COUNTY, PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF ELECTRONIC DISPLAY SIGNAGE FOR INSTITUTIONAL USES IN THE R-1 AND R -1A ZONING DISTRICTS The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: Section 1. Section 12-1B-2 is hereby amended to read as follows: INSTITUTIONAL USE: Uses operated as schools, places of worship, cemeteries, or government facilities. SIGN, ELECTRONIC DISPLAY: A sign or portion thereof that displays electronic, non - pictorial, text information in which each alphanumeric character is defined by a small number of matrix elements using different combinations of light emitting diodes (LEDs), fiber optics, light bulbs, or other illumination devices within the display area. Electronic display signs include computer programmable, microprocessor -controlled electronic displays. Section 2. Section 12 -1D -15(H) is hereby amended to read as follows: 7. By conditional use permit, an institutional use in the R-1 or R -1A zoning district which is allowed either as a permitted or conditional use may install one (1) freestanding electronic display sign, provided that each of the following requirements are met: a. The sign shall not exceed one hundred (100) square feet in area per surface. b. The sign shall not exceed nine feet (9') in height from the average natural grade at the base of the sign. c. The total area per surface for an electronic display is not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of the sign's total area. Only one (1) contiguous electronic display area is allowed per surface. d. The sign shall be set back at least ten feet (10') from any external property boundary line and shall not be located closer than fifty feet (50') to any surrounding residential property boundary line. Page 69 e. The electronic display message shall not change more than once every four (4) hours, except for emergency safety messages. Time, date, or temperature is considered one (1) electronic display when displayed alone, however it may be included as a component of any other electronic display but cannot change more than once every three (3) seconds. f The hours of operation shall be limited to 6:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. g. The electronic display message shall be limited to static letters and numbers. No portion of a message may contain animation, video or audio, scroll, flash, twirl, fade, or change color. h. The electronic display area shall be a black background and messages shall not contain more than one (1) font color. i. The electronic display message shall be a minimum of four inches (4") in height or larger as necessary to ensure readability. Messages shall be limited to advertisement of products, events, persons, institutions, activities, businesses, services or subjects which are located on the premises only or which give public service information. k. Malfunctioning signs shall be shut off immediately by the owner. Additionally, the sign owner shall immediately stop the display if notified by the City that the sign is noncompliant. 1. The sign shall be constructed in monument style fashion, including a base of natural stone, brick or other masonry material. m. The sign are shall be landscaped with materials subject to a plan a submitted with the application approved by the City Council. n. The sign shall be equipped with a sensor that detects the ambient light level and adjusts the brightness of the sign accordingly. Brightness shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles above ambient light as measured using a brightness meter from a preset distance depending on the sign size, as indicated in the table below: Sign Area Measurement Distance Sign Area (sq. ft.) Measurement Distance (ft.) 10 32 15 39 20 45 25 50 30 55 35 59 40 63 45 67 50 71 55 74 60 77 65 81 70 84 75 87 80 89 85 92 90 95 95 97 100 100 Measurement Distance = Ai (Sign Area x 100) 8. By additional conditional use permit, an institutional use in the R-1 or R -1A zoning districts which is allowed either as a permitted or conditional use may qualify for one (1) additional freestanding electronic display sign, provided that the requirements of Section H.7. above are met and each of the following additional requirements: a. The parcel, or campus containing contiguous parcels, on which the sign is proposed may be no less than forty (40) acres in size. b. The sign shall not exceed fifty (50) square feet in area per surface. c. The sign shall be set back at least three hundred feet (300') from any external property boundary line. d. Landscaping shall be installed to provide screening of the sign from any surrounding residential uses. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in effect from and after the date of its passage and publication. Adopted and ordained into an Ordinance this ## day of Month, 2014. CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Sandra Krebsbach, Mayor ATTEST Lorri Smith, City Clerk Page 70 Page 71 ELECTRONIC DISPLAY SIGN STANDARDS CITY WHERE ALLOWED STANDARDS Brooklyn Park Appears to be acceptable in all districts • 2 -minute hold time Burnsville Commercial and Industrial districts • 30 -second change interval • Not to exceed 0.5 foot-candle at property line of residential zone Champlin CUP in the commercial and industrial districts; and residential areas if applied to a church or school • 10 -second hold time • Sign must be off between 9:00 pm and 7:00 am Crystal Appears to be acceptable in all districts • Minimum of 3 -seconds within the reader board frame Eagan CUP in residential districts, allowed in all others • 20 -minute change interval • No continuation of text (scrolling) • 7 -inch minimum text size on roads 25-34 mph Golden Valley Appears to be acceptable in all districts • Message that changes more than once per 24- hour period, except displaying only the time and/or temperature. Fridley By special use permit in all districts except residential — unless sign is for an Institutional Use (churches, schools, hospitals) • 45 -second hold time • Must be 50' from residential Maplewood Business Commercial or Heavy or Light Industrial districts only • Static and maintained for a minimum of 2 -minutes • 200 ft. from any structures for residential purposes or from any park or open space land use district Minnetonka CUP use in residential districts, all other districts permitted • Main display must be static for 20 minutes • Time/temp/date allowed every 3 seconds New Hope Government buildings and structures, public, quasi -public or private recreation buildings, public parks and recreation areas, public and private educational institutions limited to accredited elementary, middle or senior high schools, and religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples and synagogues • Once every 5 seconds • Images and messages must be static • 100 ft. from any residential use unless they are screened from the adjoining residential property Plymouth Permitted for non-residential uses in residential zones and in the "Public Institutional Zones" • 32 sf. max sign area (in res. Zones); 64 sf. in PI Zone • 50 -ft. from side and rear lot lines (set back no less than 100 -ft. from residentially guided or used properties) • 15 -minute hold time • Time/temp/date may change • Color amber or white only • Sign must be off between 10:30 pm and 6:00 am Richfield Nonresidential uses in residential districts, all other districts • Occupy no more than 35% of the actual copy and graphic area • 60-seconds/static message • Time/date/temp may change every 3 seconds Shoreview Residential and Business districts • Non-residential districts: 1 hour and must be a static • Residential districts: 2 hours and must be a static • Residential districts, sign shall use an amber color West. St. Paul Business and Industrial districts • 8 -second change interval • Signs must be located 75 ft. apart Page 72 Planning Case 2014-03: Example Electronic Display Signs Cite Hall / Police City of bpCascade Bay / Civic Arena Page 73 Page 74 Convent ofthe if /id IOU ` 24oaI February 18, 2014 Nolan Wall Planner City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Mr. Wall, Thank you for sharing information regarding potential amendments to the City Code to allow electronic display signs for institutional use in Mendota Heights. I understand that this matter will be discussed at the Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, February 25. Several of us at Visitation have reviewed the document and are in support of the potential amendments to the City Code as drafted. Thank you for promoting transparency and collaboration in this decision-making process. Dawn Nichols, Ed.D. Head of School Non Scholae, Sed Vitae. Not for School, but for Life. Page 75 24-55 Visitation Drive • Mendota Heights, MN 55120 • Phone: (651) 683-1700 • Fax: (651) 454-7144 • Web site: www.visitation.net Page 76 SCHOOL DISTRICT 197 i .1.4% West St. Paul + + Eagrsn Area Dr. Nancy Allen -Mastro, Superintendent 1897 Delaware Avenue Mendota Heights, MN 55118 P 651.403.7002 F 651.403.7010 Nolan Wall, AICP Planner City of Mendota Heights 1101 Victoria Curve Mendota Heights, MN 55118 Dear Nolan, Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on the proposed changes to the Mendota Heights sign ordinance. We are pleased to know the city council is giving this consideration. Signs are an important part of communications for school districts. The city will recall that a citizen group proposed an electric sign for Henry Sibley High School several years ago. While we have not entertained the idea since, changes would make any future consideration possible. In addition, the idea of moving our stadium at Matson Field in West St. Paul to the Henry Sibley property has recently gained community support. While we have no plans for a stadium at this time, we do anticipate engaging our public in a discussion about the stadium and other facility needs at some point in the future. Thus we look forward to the City updating their code with regard to signage. In regard to the proposed changes to the ordinance, we have several concerns with their limitations. Our concerns are as follows: 1. Signs that change only once every four hours do not provide the ability to carry multiple messages in a practical way. We would suggest you look at broader guidelines such as the MnDot Technical Memorandum No. 13 -07 -ENV -01 from May 8, 2013. This standard would mitigate the distraction to drivers, but allow a more practical approach to messaging. 2. We would suggest you reconsider the limitation of static letters with no animation. This provision would limit the ability of the sign to carry effective messages. Also, creating a static message that is many lines long may tend to hold drivers' attention longer. Per your ordinance it would be possible to create a sign with 10 or more lines of text. 3. Regardless of the ability to animate the sign, the limitations of a single color are unnecessarily limiting. We would suggest there is no good reason to limit a sign to one color with a black background given all of the other limitations the city is proposing to mitigate distractions and annoyances with surrounding properties. Multiple colors are becoming more and more affordable and would only add to our mission of creating community pride for our public schools. Page 77 SCHOOL DISTRICT 197 i .1.4% West St. Paul + + Eagrsn Area Nolan Wall Page 2 4. We have very serious concerns about the definition of an electronic sign as it pertains to scoreboards. a. It would appear that your proposal to create a definition for an "additional freestanding electronic display sign", in essence defines our current scoreboards as electronic signs. b. We currently have scoreboards for both our softball and baseball fields. We believe you intend to define these as an electronic signs. This will not meet your proposed changes for quantity of signs and may not meet your setback requirements for second signs. This would limit our ability to create a monument sign, or require us to apply for an exception. c. We would suggest you redefine your limitations on secondary signs to acknowledge sight lines and light levels at the property line rather than strictly distance. We would suggest that proper orientation and placement can do far more to minimize impact to the neighbors than distance alone. For instance, turning a one-sided scoreboard into the site, but locating it on a property line may do more to mitigate impact to neighbors than a setback which allows the sign to face the neighbors. d. Many scoreboards are constructed with multiple displays to reflect the various components of the game scores, timing, etc. The proposed ordinance would make this non -conforming as it only allows one display area. e. In order to make best use of our community's school sites, it is necessary to house multiple sports activities at one site. This might include football, softball, track and field, baseball, lacrosse, and other sports as time goes on. Each of these sports may have scoreboards to best support our needs. Under the proposed ordinance, even a very small scoreboard or timing display would be prohibited. We thank you for taking our input on the proposed changes. We hope that the city will take into account the unique needs and responsibilities to our community that our schools have. Please feel free to contact me if you would like to discuss this further. Sincerely, Dr. Nancy Allen -Mastro, Superintendent of Schools School District 197 cc: Mark Fortman, Director of Operations Brian Schultz, Director of Finance Paul Aplikowski, Wold Architects and Engineers Planning Case 2005-13 Draft Zoning Amendment Language Electronic Message Boards in the R-1 District City of Mendota Heights Dakota County, Minnesota Ordinance AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 12-1J-5 J. OF THE MENDOTA HEIGHTS CITY CODE, KNOWN AS THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS. The City Council of the City of Mendota Heights hereby ordains: Section 1. Section 12-1J-5 J. is hereby amended to add the following: 12-1J-5 J.6. Notwithstanding other provisions in this Section to the contrary, signs with an electronic message board component may be constructed as a Conditional Use, pursuant to the following conditions: a. The proposed sign is an accessory use to an institutional use in an R-1 Zoning District (including schools, places of worship, or government facilities). b. No such sign may be located closer than 500 feet from any property containing a residential use. c. The proposed sign is located along an arterial roadway only (including Trunk Highway 110, Trunk Highway 55, Trunk Highway 13, Interstate Highway 35E, or Interstate Highway 494). d. The proposed message board is no greater than 32 square feet in area and 8 feet in height. e. The message may be changed no more than one time per day. No sign may present flashing, blinking or scrolling messages, and the message shall remain stationary, except for the one allowed change. 8 f. If freestanding, such sign shall be the only freestanding sign on the subject property. Section 2. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. ATTEST: , City Clerk AYES: NAYS: 9 , Mayor Page 79 Page 80 Planning Case 2005-13 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 05-41 A RESOLUTION DENYING AN APPLICATION FOR A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND VARIANCES FOR AN ANIMATED DIGITAL SIGN OR ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD SIGN AT 1897 DELAWARE AVENUE WHEREAS, Mr. Richard J. Fretschel has applied for a Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Variances for an Animated Digital Sign or "Electronic Message Board Sign" as described in the application for such sign at 1897 Delaware Avenue [Section 25 Twn 28 Range 23 SE 1/4 of NE '/ Less Hgwy 98/100 A Ex Pt for St (Parcel ID: 27 02500 010 03)] as proposed in Planning Case #05-13; and WHEREAS, signs listed in Zoning Ordinance Section 12-1J-5 G are "Prohibited Signs", and WHEREAS, said sign constitutes a Prohibited Sign within the meaning of Zoning Ordinance Section 12-1J-5 G 2, 3 and 8., and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this application at their regular meeting on May 24, 2005; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission, because of a tie vote, did not make a recommendation to the Council to either approve or deny the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Variances for an Animated Digital Sign or Electronic Message Board Sign as presented to the Planning Commission on the evening of May 24, 2005 and as shown in Planning Case #05-13; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights that a Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Variances for an Animated Digital Sign or Electronic Message Board Sign for 1897 Delaware Avenue as proposed in Planning Case #05-13 is hereby denied. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in support of the above denial, the Council hereby makes the following Findings of Fact: 1. Mendota Heights is a predominately low density residential city. The Council finds that Animated Digital Signs or Electronic Message Board Signs conflict with and will reduce the low density residential character of our community by providing a more retail/commercial appearance. 2. Animated Digital Signs or Electronic Message Board Signs can create a distraction to drivers which might result in traffic accidents and endanger public safety. 3. Animated Digital Signs or Electronic Message Board Signs can result in a nuisance to surrounding properties because of the brightness of lights used therein. Limitation of propagation of Animated Digital Signs or Electronic Message Board Signs is likely to create enforcement issues for the City in enforcement of its zoning regulations. 5. Proliferation of Animated Digital Signs or Electronic Message Board Signs within the City will negatively affect the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community. 6. The variances are not necessary in order to put the property to reasonable use because the property is currently used by Henry Sibley High School. 7. There are no unique circumstances pertaining to the applicant's property or this request, not caused by the owner that create a sufficient hardship to justify any of the requested variances. 8. Approval of the requested variances will alter the essential character of the neighborhood by imposing a more retail/commercial characteristic on this primarily residential neighborhood. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and Variances for an Animated Digital Sign or Electronic Message Board Sign for 1897 Delaware Avenue as proposed in Planning Case #05-13 would have an adverse impact on the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the community and the surrounding land, and would be adverse to the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights This 21st day of June, 2005. ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA H IGHTS By��-Z,�'1.,.,--- /(4c4.r�-,e.._-Ai._- Kathl en M. Swanson, City Clerk By John Page 81 Page 82 INSTITUTIONAL USES R-1 & R -1A Zoning Districts Planning Case 2014-03 Date: 2/17/2014 0 3,500 SCALE IN FEET City of Mendota Heights Zoning Districts R-1 B -1A R -1A R-2 R-3 MR -PUD HR -PUD B-1 B-2 B-3 B-4 MU -PUD State Park Institutional Uses (w/in R-1 & R -1A) Institutional Uses 1) Somerset Elementary School 2) St. Paul United Methodist Church 3) Henry Sibley High School 4) Mendota Elementary School 5) Holy Family Maronite Church 6) City Hall/Police Department 7) Beth Jacob Congregation 8) St. Peter's Church 9) Acacia Park Cemetery 10) Resurrection Cemetery 11) Fire Hall 12) St. Thomas Academy 13) Convent of the Visitation School 14) Friendly Hills Middle School 15) Mendota Heights United Church of Christ 16) Children's Country Day School ..".nwu • •. ■//i11 h:: gib:... 11110= 11111 lllll 1111 mmllmmI/ Document Path: I:\Planning\2014\2014-03 Code Amendment - Electronic Display Signs\Maps\Institutional Uses_Case 2014-03.mxd Page 83 Affidavit of Publication State of Minnesota • SS County of Dakota ANNE THILLEN , being duly sworn, on oath, says that he/she is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as SOUTH-WEST REVIEW , and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) 'The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. (B) The printedNOTICE OF HEARING which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on SUNDAY , the 9TH day of FEBRUARY , 2014 , and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including , the day of , 20 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: *A B C D E F G H I J KLM N O P Q RSTU V WXYZ ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ *abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz Subscribed and sworn to before me on t is 10TH day of FEBRUARY . 14 Notary Public BY: TITLE LEGAL COORDINATOR *Alphabet should be in the same size and kind of type as the notice. ing TONYA R. WHITEHEAD Notary Public -Minnesota RATE INFORMATION My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2015 av' (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space $25.00 per col. inch (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter $25.00 per col. inch (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter $ per col. inch 1/14 Page 84 CITY-OFMENDOTA HEIGHTS': NOTICE OF HEARING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW ELECTRONIC DISPLAY SIGNS FOR INSTITUTIONAL USES IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Planning Commission of• Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, February 25, 2014 in the City Hall. Council !! Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, to consider . . an application from the City of Mendota Heights for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow electronic display signs for institutional use's in. residential zoning districts. This request has been assigned Planning Case number 2014-03. , This notice is pursuant to Title 12 (Zoning), Chapter 1, Article D of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this' request will be heard at this meeting: Lorri Smith City Clerk (South-West Review: Feb.` 9, 2014) Page 85 Stantec Item No. 2014-06 MEMORANDUM Date: February 25, 2014 To: Mendota Heights Planning Commission From: Tina Goodroad, AICP, Consulting Planner RE: Planning Case 2014-06: United Properties 1. Preliminary and Final Plat approval of Mendota Technology Center 4th Addition 2. Conditional Use Permit Request to Amend a Planned Unit Development Action Deadline: April 12, 2014 BACKGROUND United Properties ("applicant/developer") has submitted an application for a preliminary and final plat to be known as Mendota Technology Center 4th Addition, which will combine two lots, from two separate subdivisions, into one lot. The applicant is also requesting approval for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to amend a Planned Unit Development (PUD) from the original development plan for the construction of a 96,984 square foot office/warehouse building. The applicant has developed the majority of the land within the Mendota Heights Business Park over the past 30 years and this is one of the few remaining sites the final vacant parcel to be developed. The site is located on 8.3 acres located north of Interstate 494, and south of Northland Drive and east of Pilot Knob Road. The property is zoned I -Industrial and Guided Industrial on the Future Land Use Plan. The proposed office/warehouse is a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district and consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. HISTORY The original PUD in was approved in 1997 with several minor amendments approved since for architectural and design changes to buildings approved within this PUD. The original approval Design with community in mind Page 86 included Outlot A, Mendota Technology Center as part of the original plat. Therefore, any development of Outlot A shall be by a CUP to amend the PUD. Zoning Ordinance Article K -Planned Unit Development, 12 -1K -6(G) states that amendments are required for "all other changes in use, or rearrangements of lots, blocks and building tracts, any changes in the provision of common open spaces, and all other changes in the approved final plan must be made by the council under the procedures authorized by this chapter for the approval of a conditional use permit. No amendments may be required by the council because of changes in conditions that have occurred since the final plan was approved or by changes in the development policy of the community." Preliminary and Final Plat The subject property consists of one lot and an Outlot in two separate plats. The proposed preliminary and final plat will combine these parcels and create Lot 1, Block 1, Mendota Technology Center 4th Addition. The proposed plat meets the minimum lot size requirements of the Industrial District of one (1) acre. The proposed lot totals 8.31 acres. When the original PUD was approved in 1997 it included a plat for Lots 1-5 and Outlot A, Mendota Technology Center. At that time park dedication was fees were determined for each of the Lots and Outlot A. At the time of approval the City's Park Dedication Contribution Formula required that ten (10) percent of market value contribution be made in the case of industrial plats. A park dedication fee of $26,800 was determined for Outlot A to be paid when it develops. According to City records there is no record of any payment for Outlot A, therefore the park dedication fee of $26,800 will be required with the approval of and before release of the Final Plat. ANALYSIS The CUP to amend the original development plan of the PUD will be reviewed under the I -Industrial Requirements and related performance standards outlined below: Page 87 Development Chart Lot Area: 8.3 Acres Building Area Proposed: 96,984 square feet Building Coverage Proposed: 26.8 Maximum Coverage allowed: 50% Floor Area Ratio Proposed: 0.2 Floor Area Ratio allowed: 0.5 Green Area proposed: 30.6% Green Area required: 25% Parking Lot Green Area Proposed: 5.3% Parking Lot Green Area Required: 5% Parking Requirements: Office Use: 29,095 SF at one space per 200 SF requires: 145 spaces Warehouse Use: 67,889 SF at one per 2000 SF requires: 34 spaces Total Parking Required: 179 spaces Total Parking Provided: 186 spaces Total Proof of Parking: 53 spaces Total Ultimate Provided: 237 spaces The proposed building will be situated in the center of the lot with the east elevation serving as the main entry. The site will have two driveways into the site from Northland Drive. The easterly driveway will serve employees and customers accessing the main building entry while the westerly driveway will serve the trailer parking and dock access. Based on the positioning of the building on the lot all minimum setbacks are being met. Parking and Loading The proposed parking is largely accommodated on the east side of the site nearest the main entry. Additional proof of parking is shown along the west property line where the applicant is indicating storage of up to 25 trailers. The applicant is constructing this facility on a speculative Page 88 basis therefore not all final tenants are known. The applicant is proposing the trailer storage area within the proof of parking area based on possible need of a future tenant(s). All proposed parking areas are located on the interior side of the site, not facing a public street. The parking lot and loading areas will be completely hard surfaced with bituminous pavement. The proposed building includes 18 loading docks along the west elevations plus storage/parking of 25 trailers. The westerly drive will accommodate access for the loading docks with enough maneuverability provided to access with docks. Title 12-1D-16 requires parking spaces to be nine feet (9') wide and twenty feet (20') in length with access drives of twenty four (24') feet. The parking stalls and access drives for the eastern building entrances meet the Code requirements. As part of the proposed PUD Amendment, Staff is recommending allowing for the curbed parking stalls in this area to be revised to eighteen (18') feet in length in order to facilitate a reduction in impervious surface and assist with storm water runoff drainage and treatment. A similar standard applies to retail sales and service complexes in the I -Industrial District, as in Title 12-1G-2. Xcel Energy owns and operates a twenty-six inch (26") gas pipeline in an easement adjacent to 1-494 within the southern portion of the property. Xcel Energy has reviewed the proposed plans and the request for an encroachment into the gas pipeline easement for a parking lot and has provided approval with six (6) conditions. The letter has been attached and a condition has been added referencing the encroachment approval conditions by Xcel Energy. Landscaping and Screening The applicant has provided a complete landscaping plan. Article D, General Zoning Provisions, 12-1D-13-2 includes additional requirements for all B and 1 districts. Within this section is item D, Landscaping Requirements. The following are the basic requirements and how the proposed landscape plan compares: • The site plan exceeds the 25% area landscaping requirement by providing a total of 30.6%. • The site plan exceeds the 5% area landscaping within the parking area by providing a total of 5.3% • The proposed plantings meet the minimum size at installation requirements. • An underground sprinkler system (with moisture sensors) will be installed for building foundation plantings and all sod areas as required by item "h" of this article. Page 89 Landscaping Plan Overview The applicant is proposing a nice variety of evergreen, over -story and ornamental trees around the site perimeters (north, west and east sides). The entry off of Northland Drive will include a storm water pond with new trees planted at the southwest corner and south edge of the pond. A mix of existing trees and new Black Hills Spruce will line the entire westerly property line where the proposed trailer storage will be located and loading docks are facing. Item E of this section requires that "External loading and service areas must be completely screened from the ground level view from contiguous properties and adjacent streets, except at access point. This screening shall be provided through fences, walls, berms or landscaping materials with a minimum of ninety (90) percent opacity during all seasons." Efforts appear to be made to preserve as many trees as possible along the westerly property line while adding twenty (20) Black Hill Spruce. These trees will be raised (five feet) above the adjacent parking lot. While these trees cannot fully screen the height of a trailer, the mixture of existing and new trees should be effective in screening headlights on to the neighboring property (existing hotel and parking lot). However, the proposed line of trees will likely not fully screen the view of the loading docks from view of the west property as required by ordinance. Staff has concerns whether tree preservation will be fully effective thereby leaving some gaps if the trees do not thrive after construction. Staff recommends additional evergreen plantings or mixture of tall evergreen shrubs to be added between the Black Hill Spruce to fill in potential gaps. The easterly property line will include a wider variety of trees with some preservation of existing trees. The parking lot will include Imperial Honeylocust within the islands. The building perimeter on the east and south elevations will be landscaped with sod; with the east elevation including trees and shrubs. The presence of landscaping at a building edge can really improve an elevation design and soften the appearance of a building. Staff is supportive of the proposed landscaping plan with some additional planting on the western property line. Site Lighting Article!, Performance standards 12-11-15 includes standards for lighting with the following minimum requirement: Lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security Page 90 purposes shall create a reading of no more than 0.2 foot-candle at the shared property line with a commercial or industrial use or public right of way, and shall create a reading of zero foot-candles at the shared property line with residentially zoned property. (Ord. 429, 8-3-2010) The proposed landscaping plan includes some potential locations for parking lot and site lighting. The plan also indicates that a final lighting plan will be submitted for review and approval separately. A condition has been added that a full lighting plan be submitted and approved based on ordinance requirements. In addition, a landscaping performance bond will be collected for landscaping. This bond will help staff work with the applicant to ensure trees intended to be preserved actually thrive after construction and that full growth of proposed evergreens meet the intent of the ordinance for screening. Building Materials and Architecture Building design and materials is governed by Article D, General Zoning Provisions, 12-1D-13-3, Additional Requirements for all B and I Districts- item C. This section requires that: 1. Exterior Surfaces, Including Roofs: Buildings shall be finished on all sides with permanent finished materials of a quality consistent with the standards set in the district in which it is located. Exterior wall surfaces shall be any one or more of the following: a. Face brick or natural stone. (1) Professionally designed precast concrete units, if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture, or (2) Decorative block, if incorporated in a building design which is compatible with other development throughout the district. b. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed modular panel construction, if the panel materials are any of those listed in subsection C1a of this section, glass, prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron) or plastic used in accordance with the building code requirements. Page 91 c. No building exterior shall be constructed of sheet aluminum, asbestos, iron, steel, or corrugated aluminum, unless specifically approved by city council. The applicant provided building elevations for all four elevations plus a colored plan for the east elevation. The major materials consist of painted precast concrete panels in two colors. The building corners and entries include a combination of glass, rock face block, brick and prefinished metal. The east elevation includes windows at the lower portion of the building while the north and south elevations include windows at the top third of the elevations. Each elevation also includes three accent bands that wrap around all four elevations. This accenting and windows work well to break up the large facade. The north and south elevations, visible from roadways will feature the precast, corner treatments, windows and accent banding. The proposed building materials meet the minimum ordinance requirements. Staff is supportive of the proposed building design. Item 6 of this section requires that "all trash and trash handling equipment be stored within the principal structure or within the attached structure accessible from within the principal structure." On the west elevation two trash enclosures are connected to the wall and enclosed with a gate. Item 7 of this section requires that "whenever possible, rooftop mechanical units shall be of low profile variety. All ground level and rooftop mechanical utilities, other than low profile rooftop units, shall be completely screened with one or more of the materials used in the construction of the principal structure. Where practicable, rooftop screening shall be accomplished through the use of parapet walls." It is difficult to verify from the elevations plans if rooftop units will be visible. A condition will be added that information be provided to the Planner to verify that this requirement is satisfied prior to the issuance of a building permit. Signage Article D, General Zoning Provisions, 12-1D- 15 pertains to signage. Item I, 4 of this section requires a "Comprehensive Sign Plan: A comprehensive sign plan shall be provided for industrial developments. Such plan, which shall include the location, size, height, lighting and orientation of all signs shall be submitted to the planning commission for preliminary plan approval regulations. Provided such a comprehensive plan is presented, exceptions to the sign performance standards Page 92 of this chapter may be permitted if sign areas and densities for the plan as a whole are in conformity with the intent of this chapter and if such exception results in an improved relationship between the various parts of the plan." The applicant is proposing a monument sign to be located at the east drive entrance ten (10) from the property line (meets minimum setback). The proposed monument sign is ten (10) feet in height and eight (8) feet in width for a total of eighty (80) square feet. The proposed monument sign will be constructed of brick and rock face block to match the building. Five (5) potential signage locations are indicated. Additional tenant signs are proposed on the east, north and south elevations. A final signage package will be required to be reviewed approved prior to the issuance of a sign permit. Recommendation Staff recommends that Planning Commission recommend to the City Council approval of the application for a Preliminary and Final Plat and a Conditional Use Permit to amend a PUD with the following conditions: 1. The landscaping plan shall be revised to provide additional plantings to meet the ninety (90) percent opacity along the west property line and a performance bond collected as allowed for by the City Code 2. A final lighting plan shall be submitted and approved prior to installation. 3. The applicant shall provide additional information regarding any potential visibility of rooftop mechanical units to ensure compliance with the ordinance. 4. Final sign package shall be submitted for review and issuance of a sign permit. 5. Park dedication fee of $26,800 is collected prior to issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the conditions provided by Xcel Energy in the encroachment approval letter dated January 31, 2014. Page 93 7. The applicant will ensure all necessary easements are identified and agreed to, to include drainage and utility easements over storm water treatment ponds and utility easements as required by the utility companies, prior to approval and recording of the final plat. 8. A 2 -foot reduction in the codified depth dimension of parking stalls is allowed for stalls that abut 90 -degrees to a curb in order to facilitate a reduction in impervious surface and assist with storm water runoff drainage and treatment. 9. A Development Agreement is signed between United Properties and the City of Mendota Heights. REQUESTED ACTION Following the public hearing and discussion, the Planning Commission may consider the following actions: 1. Recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development Amendment, based on the findings of fact, with conditions. OR 2. Table the request, pending additional information from staff or others. MATERIALS INCLUDED FOR REVIEW The following exhibits are attached for your review: 1. Findings of Fact 2. Location Map 3. Planning Application with supporting materials 4. Letter from Xcel Energy Page 94 FINDINGS OF FACT FOR APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit to Amend a Planned Unit Development United Properties — Mendota Technology Center 4th Addition 1. A Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved in 1997 for the development of the Mendota Heights Business Park. 2. The plat of Outlot A and proposed construction of an office/warehouse building nearly completes development within Mendota Heights Business Park. 3. The proposed building meets the lot area, setback, and green area requirements of the I -Industrial Zoning District. 4. The proposed reduction in parking stall length for a portion of the site is consistent with other uses in the Business Park and will allow for a reduction in impervious surface and assist with storm water runoff drainage and treatment. 5. The proposed landscaping plan meets the overall intent of the ordinance with additional screening. 6. The building elevations provide for a high quality addition to the business park and are compatible with surrounding properties. Page 95 PID# 27-52220-01-020 PID# 27-48446-00-010 Planning Case 2014-06 Date: 2/18/2014 0 175 SCALE IN FEET City of nisiMendota Heights ENTERPRISE DR NORTHLAND DR r 1494 Ell PILOT KNOB RD RAMP ....1 erometrics GIS Map Disclaimer: This data is for informational purposes only and should not be substituted for a true title search, property appraisal, plat, survey, or for zoning verification. The City of Mendota Heights assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained in this data. The City of Mendota Heights, or any other entity from which data was obtained, assumes no liability for any errors or omissions herein. If discrepancies are found, please contact the City of Mendota Heights. Contact "Gopher State One Call" at 651-454-0002 for utility locations, 48 hours prior to any excavation. 1101 Vittoria Curve 1 •Mendota. Heights; M14 55118 651,452.1850 phone ( 651.452,8940 fax www.meiidota heijbts.corn •CITY of IVIENDOTA HEIGHTS APPLICATION FOR CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING REQUEST Property Address/Street Location: Applicant Name: United Properties (Brandon Champeau) Phone: 952-837-8653 Applicant E -Mail Address: brandon.champeau@uproperties.com Applicant Mailing. Address: brandon.champeau@uproperties.com Property Owner Name: United Land LLC (United Properties) Phone: 952-837-8653 Property Owner Mailing Address: 3600 American Blvd W #750, Bloomington, MN 55431 Legal Description & PIN of Property: (Complete Legal from Title or Deed must be provided) Title and survey emailed separately Type of Request: ❑ Rezoning ❑ Variance • Subdivision Approval. ❑ Code Amendment ❑ Conditional Use Permit ❑ Wetlands Permit ❑ Critical Area Permit ❑ Lot Split • Conditional Use Permit for PUD ❑ Preliminary/Final Plat Approval ❑ Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Other I hereby declare that all statements made in this request an 1 further authorize City Officials and agents e sect the .. i• R" re Appl n the additional material are true. ove property during daylight hours. /3 /1-f Date Planning Application (modified 1/28/2014) gnatreof•�►-r Date Signature of Owner (ifmore than one) Date Page 1 of 1 Page 3i 1101 Victoria Curve I Mendota Heights, MN. 55118 551,152185Q!bone; i 651,4528840: fax www m ndota h2ights Cont CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REQUEST Applications will be scheduled for consideration by the Planning Commission and/or City Council only after all required materials have been submitted. Application submittal deadlines are available on the City's website or by contacting the City Planner. Late or incomplete applications will not be put on the agenda. APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS: • Dated original of all the materials checked must be submitted by the end of the business day the Monday before the first Tuesday of the month. • If all original materials are 11 x 17 or smaller — only submit. originals. If materials are larger than 11 x 17, please provide 24 copies, folded to 8 %2 X 11. • Any drawing in color — must submit 24 copies. The following materials must be submitted for the application to be considered complete: 16, Fee, as included in Fee Schedule (check payable to City of Mendota Heights) 1-114 NOTE: Planning Application fees do not cover building permit fees, utilities, or other fees which may be required for you to complete your project. ;t P V. Completed Application Form (only original needs to be submitted). ('. Letter of Intent. 4 Development Schedule, indicating: 1i Approximate start date of construction of the project. • Proposed project staging and anticipated construction timelines. o Anticipated rate of development. • Area and location of common open space provided at each stage. O Copies of proposed agreements, provisions or covenants which will govern use, maintenance and continued protection of the PUD and any of its common open spaces, for information purposes only. Site Development Plan, including: Location of all buildings, including existing and proposed. '0' Location of all adjacent buildings located within 350' of the exterior boundaries of the property in question. %O. Floor area ratio. . Location and number of existing and proposed parking spaces. Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit. Development Request (modified 92/6/2013) Page 1 of 2 Vehicular circulation. ii- Architectural elevations (type and materials used on all external surfaces 1- Sewer and water alignment, existing and proposed. *Location and candle power of all luminaries. 17i,Location of all existing easements. Dimension Plan, including: )1 Lot dimensions and area. I& Dimensions of proposed and existing structures. Y:1- "Typical" floor plan and "typical" room plan. Setbacks on all structures existing or proposed on property in question. Proposed setbacks. Grading Plan, including: Existing contour. Proposed grading elevations. Drainage configuration. '- Storm sewer catch basins and invert elevations. 1 Spot elevations. 76 Proposed road profile. Landscape Plan, including: Location of all existing trees, type, diameter and which trees will be removed. Location, type and diameter of all proposed plantings. 14- Location and material used of all screening devices. NOTES: Conditional Use Permit for Planned Unit Development Request (modified 1216/2013) Page 2 of 2 Page.... Page 99 UNITED PROPERTiES TO; Nolan Wall, Planner, City of Mendota Heights FROM! Rrardan Charnpeau, Assistant Viae President, United Properties DATE: February 3, 2014 RE: Description of new efficeR&arclieuse project Wr r: r kiii irl;l:i? r' ail for a nevi: Sl offir.e/warehouse building on the g acre parcel in the Mendota t: i.,iness Park. Unted Properties has owned and develop,. -Touch of the land in this park for over 3:.1 years, and we are excitor to ramplmr• the development c, ort, 71- our last remaining vacant parcels. This setisfv a trenwnnor:s need for functional cffice/warehouse space along the 1-494 corridor. Vic, expect Ire ia: k = r risick riihJe interest from companies looking for this product to relocate and/or cxp.inri ' 7tr tllr-. 1^•:1cnilota Heights market. Aesthetically, the Eiuile ii 'add fit in :rwe'I as we have incorpoi .11+ rJ rr `1g of the citltiit;n elements currently existing ori buildeiir, This illi allow the prom( i. lrr hi: in i-iirn ossly, r Ir.ling to the class A nature of this e•�-e . If our project is approved F v tFic.. city. we expect to begin construct en in,i,i_'.ILr y+ in tln ;E., 'r t?, wft i the intent of delivering a conapieted building to the market in fall of 201.1. We are pleased to See the market activity picking up and look 1Lu .0,,trr I,n iu with the City of Mendota Heights on the next chapter of this exciting business park. Sane- cly, Brandon " hampeau .3:irtI At *rir, i7 Blvd. W. S.ui1e2D© hlinnearyclis, MN 55431 T ‘;"32.835.5300 F 952.893.8206 IlpTbaeities.Cam N:\2008\2008298\2008296A\Dw98\2008298A002.dwg 1/31/2014 3:07:25 PM CST Page 100 0 W 1/4 COR OF S. 34, T. 28, R. 23 A Ar -n /n/-1TA IV/ L_ / V Li L./ / N N V) • coo n^ co co II II CO 0 I / /r-//'/ /T^ r7L_ / 707 / BITUMINO / r -A 1-7-r-0 ) vL_/ V / L_/ \ z. /n/r LP / il7 4 / / A /A 1-11ThI7 //1n/ /-ILJLJ//IL//V 1_71 ni\/ LiL_L/ \ (PUBLIC ROAD) E/VTERPR/SE ' ROAD_ / BM#3 871.8 872.4 TC TC 872.7 HYD / x 870.6 x871.5 FND IRON MON TC R.L.S. 15480 870.4 872 WVcz B JI 872.4V SAN x (� TOP=B 3.7 J /NV=86 N /NV=865. S /NV=860.7 5 DROP PIPE - 86 .2 TC 869.7 TC 870.2 TC 870.2 _GAS n TC 871.0 VTC _ 37 /2/9.24 TC TC 8905/'46"W 872.3 871.5 X89°50'27"EJ Tc 129‘1 8-72.0 872.8 WV 40 EMH 8 2. T LP / /-- L_ L/ / TR /1 / lJ EX/STING 1 DING 1 TR TR° SPR NI SPR GRASS ER: MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS, LLC C31 SPR TR PID#27-48300-04-/00 I T 1 TC TC 875.0 875.1 =874.5 V SAN V 87 CB / (41 T TC TC 7 Cr 876.0 876.9 877.8 /2"W I �� B"SAN S IVOAT LAN4 2/'RCP ST 877. I -41 A Ar-AV/L./FM /1-1,1 TA / /r-/,' / /T^ /A In l / 'Tr)///-A1 l /1 / D/.r' I V/ L_ /vel./ / /-1 / 7/ _ / 7 [ 7 / 1/ v L� v 1 1 \ //-I L _ //:)/-1 / \ / L_L.// .� /7 O HCS r HCS HCS CS PKS. • SPR +'��R J LP TRS `� GRASS� �1R�� CSS dC L _ / `1- L. L_ L/ �-' l'.\ 'I- ��BM#2 CB 882.0 TC YD TC TC TOP=8826 TC 881.9 882.6,. 883.j VC/ /NV=879. / 883.8 TR TC oLP TC 878.6 879.4 (PUBL/CL,I' DEDICATED) 78.0 879.0 88� I x 880.1 N89°50 '27"E'\ N85/'46 "E\ 585.9 881 880.9 TC x 830.6 G TC I 881.4 DkVE WV -x 882.4 SAN CB OP -8 0 TOP=882. TOP=86 .6 /NV=877./ E /NV/NV=876.9 W /NV=8772 N 883.3 884.4 0 4/NER: MENDOTA OFF/CE HOLDINGS P/D#27-43300-104-090 TR TC 884.7 *LP 1 885.0 BITUMNOUS 875.3 GAS CB TOP=870.7 /NV=865.6 2 5T x871 < TC' Ni 871.9 ^ ~001 co N oN V N 872.1 <n TC TC 872.10 872.7 z 872.7 TC UGC PVC ST SMH x 874.4 TOP-8�.4 7"COT INV -84.8 9 9 �(� 875.1 50 7"CO 72.9 RB x 870_2 875.2 SAN / TOP=873.8 /NV=866.3 877.9 X878.8 876. I 7'877.0 880.0 88 ,��E GAS i 877.2 878.3 88 L- 876.4 x 876.6 x / R77 7 T87�� 875.9 7"COT I3- I6"COT 4"COT 2-15"COT \ 887 .3 875.'3 15"CO A \876.1 875.3 7"COT I I "COT 874.9 17"COT 87.1 / • 87.9 CB / TOP=873.4 /NV=867.2 E /NV=863.8 N /NV=867.6 NE /NV=864.2 S n SMH / TOP=874.6 /NV=864.5 W /NV=864.4 N x 8778 877.6 14' CT 877.4 l3 'COT -8"MPL 872.9 TC 873.1 ARB 873 4 873.8 co mm ce co m14.1 CB TOP=87/. 8 /NV=666.3 x N) OD 374.0 29. OVER NG • h CZ) Q iv, [(,) Ld 1,,, .4, ffi exti__10Lci 2E CL 874.0 oo m w 1- w O✓ U Z 0 U n m 10.8 2-1 - 'COT 87'.7 6.2 6"COT 876.1 8' COT 875.9 1 5"COT 873.8 2-6"PINR 4.1 PINR 2-6"ELM 875.6 x 875.3 x 875.5 x 875.3 x 875.3/ LU /I- z 875.0 0 8"ELM �` 0 874.5 r xcD o' - "CRAB 3 \ x 876.4 "l (f) 00 0< <0 N- CONC ETE BENCH MARKS (Bench marks shown I.) Top of top Elevation = 2.) Top of top Elevation = 3.) Top of top Elevation = 872.9 WWB L 87.5 873.8 ■ 8' SPCB\ 87..2 874.0 8"SPCB "S CB 874.1 874.2 873.7 872.9WW6 872.9 WOOD WALL 872.3 CB TOP=87/ / /NV=866.35 r_ C) - J 872.5 TC LP 872.7 TC 872.2 0 TC TC 8"SPCB 873,5 74.7 "CRAB \ 874. ' 4"C' AB x 8\7 I 876.0 x 876 1- 1876.0 I I 175,9 Cti / x 876.3 x 876.3 876.7 x 876.6 877.8 / x 877.1 ix 877.0 x 877. x 17,9 x 878.0 5 t 7.1x 878.6 8"COT 878.1 I I "COT 878.1 17"COT 882.5 Il 'COT x 878.3 x 879.2 x 879.4 N 879.3 x 878.2 ( x 8775 t x 878.3 /9 PINR 5 CB ii) 872.8 TC TC 873.0 i-oo STB / oo all o arm / OD 1 T 878. 0 / x 8174) / a) 01 i.j )X 878./ • co I reference 9. SHB x 878.1 NGVD 1929 Datum) x 878.13 7378.8 RA Alb • x 879.4 879.3 880.0 879.9 18"COT UGE UGC 8'2.6 X 882.2 83.0 lid iL. UGC 882.8 -$82.0-88G.b 2-9" 0T 1 1 "COT 2-7"COT 1 1 "COT V 9"COT 88881.8 889.4 /j 2-1 1 "COTTT ��'I sv x 879.1 x 879.7 x 88 .7 x 181.9 x142.9 x 88 .8 DR AGE & T/LI T Y EASEIINENT PER M'NDOTA HEI HTS INDUST /AL PARK, & I ORTHLAND RIVE ADDI TIfN - 15 x 879.4 x 880.5 / / x881.3 x882.3 x 8,81.7 � / / / 880.0 x 879.6 ,...._ 4 ,Hoer----- 13"20-1 / 880.8 881.0 5 / 882.5 880.6 "ELM 1 881.1 //< I C pe.5 x 88215 5 5.01 x 883.4 885.1 z886. b 879.9 r 71 /////kq9.5 I()\ 887.4x N x 887( x 887.7 x 887.3 8841 A x 886.7 80.9 x 880.5 881.0 x 881.2 x 881.7 x 882.8 x 881.3 x 881.9 x 882.1 x 883.6 889-0 8 5 x 886.5 88821„ 8415 r)3L \./c x 881.4 x 885.6 885.1 X3Ep.2 /6.0 x 887 x 882.7 x 182.6 x 883.0 x r2.8 883.0 26"CAS MN DOT R/W 880 7 882.2 884.0 83857.4/58j A FND 1/2 INC OPEN IRON nut of hydrant; NW corner of Jupiter Dr 8c Northland Dr. 891.62 feet nut of hydrant; N side of Northland Dr., 2nd hydrant W of Jupiter Dr. 884.81 feet nut of hydrant; NW corner of Enterprise Dr & Northland Dr. 874.72 feet RIGHT OF ACCESS TO STATE OF M/NIVE OTA PER DOC. NO. 6 733 LL LLI 0 I- CC UJ Et CC 0 LLI MI- I- LLI OC Ci) Et Li x 884. x 8817 x 884.7 x 884.7 x 884.2 x 884.7 884. 883.9 x 884 6 2 I 883.0 / x 884. / /72 x 894.5 UGC ---1_187? sr s 883.3 X883.9 GASB • fiC 9 884.4..111‘1111111115-1111111111MIE IEI°. a MtmlmIBUVR Q) = r RCP STS mil,01 HB4O- f • TR SPR TR JUPITER DRIVE LLC 885 TZ 886.4 GRASS ' WV WV 17 CB \\ TOP=88.9 INV -880.5 S INV -879.5\W\ _J�/V=879.6 E x 886.3 FND IRON MON R.L.S. 15480 WV LB j87.41 x 884.2 SKIMMER / TOP=887.4 INV -882.0 SE /NV=884.4 5 / /NV=88/.4/� x 884.7 x 885.5 / x 886.2 /887.0 DRAINAGE & UTILIITY EASEMENT P R MENDOTA HEIGHT INDUSTRIAL PIRK, MENDOTA HEIGH S TECHNOLOGY CENTER, MENDOTA HEIGH S TECHNOL OG4 CENTER 4 2ND ADDITION. / I 0 x B8/ / 7.4 885.0 x 885'7/ RIP RA I5' RC' 887.9x / x 88 686.1 889.4 x 891.7 (<8„.3_24. leg93.8 111 \\\\0 904. n 8 9 ck 2 90 x 895.2 8 7.3 / / 43.9.01X 893.9 • 894.6 9 9 884/1 kR 899. LI 'Tt8P \4;\ 89 695. 890.3 x 900.8 /3 884.4 x 884.5 886.2 4 FT CHAIN LINK FENCE k387.5 4.9 x 884.5 x 884.6 (PUBLICLY DEDICATED) 896.2 /t----3( 895.4 896.2 I 893.7 890.6 ix Z17.4 49(.! • 905.7 905,.6 897.8 ir 896.9 898<2 897.9 x 889.9 (PRIVATE ROAD) 887.9 OWNER: MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS LL C P/D#27-48300-104-080 fTR BM#1 TC 888.3 8" SAN S HYD 889.0<a SA SAN TOP=889.2 /NV=87/.3 W INV=87/.9 BOT=862.9 _fv1PLo rTC889 TC � O 2"SPCG SPR TR CHH 0 LP 889.7 TR / /1T L l/ / TCS o, 00 triTR SPR OCB I 1 890.4 DRAINAGE & UTILIrEASEMENT PER MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER & MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION a 2"SPCG 2"SPCG LP 85. 3-1"C 3"M L mi- 889 4 TC 889.0 TC 887.6 x 887.5 x I �LSt6xl. 88ti l \ $8. jii 888.2' lx x 13T1PCIGI 1 I 311DJ 888.3x1 84E 888.81 i \ (i x 892.4 ICP\ 5 lx/ I 1 l' 1 i I 1 8 9 16;y 41/. 7/86 1 /x8Z.5 811211:c:1 . 8 /.8 / // /48Ck L 894.01 891 IF891.8 4.9 LO x 84.9 x 885.3 x 886.4 ca x 886. o 886.2 886.0 Co x 886.6 887. (887.0 x 887.3 886 32 x 888.8 1 IB 1j 89 0 8 9 • 888 6/ x '•- 889.2 4"MPL CO 889.3 890.3c890C TC 889.6 0 0 CB TOP=888.2 IN V=883.2 CB rOP=887.9 /Nk=882.3 E /Nk=882.2 S /Nk=882.1 NW 00 890.3 grj 89 9 x 891.7 )i (c1r879.29.3x8.99.)\ \i 891.3 x 91 892.0\----- li *--sggx,B.,4 \\ \ ) 8.90.5"."---;9c7...6..k ((1 (iixL4.1Px 8,°44 1.11 /x __x,e9\2\ 91.5 \ ....9..50....=/21 ; r 891.3 ( 8924 . \ \\Th j 8 12.3 1 893 4 8. 8,0 6 CO ! 0 89 5 892.0 3.71 6dI.4 x 886)7 887.5 88 I x 888.8 x 888.5 N 00 (IS ct FND 1/2 INCH REBAR 494 j 889.0 / 889.7 r;9 890.4 x 891.5 x 81.6 91 I 00 rs, co to to X 890.4 /891.9 892.0 TC TC 890.1 890 kk- co L3"MPL CONC CURB - TC 3uMFIIC C0892.0 892.0 00) 1-00 892.5 or 0 CO 892 WOOD Gin 92.8 891.1 TC 3"MPL TC TC 89C2,13 0s,,I 1-00 x 891.3 tO c0 • 3"MPL 891.1 89 TC LP 0)0 1.6 6 892.7 TC TC TC 13922.6 892.0 0 oar Ns 0 col - 0) QI 891.8 TC to HHC 8913 '- 8913. 891. x 891.4 3"SPC 92.4 0 892.5 x CO 892.8 D x 893.2 893.0 TC 893.1 1 co to 3"MP 93.6 893.7 TC TC 894.11 3"MPL TC X 8/3. 7 x 883.5 3/894.9 'MPL TC co • 8913.6x 00 00 94.2 3"MPL 895.2 TC 8 3.7" 894.4 x 3 2 OA 92.8 TC FND IRON MON 889.7 891.5 x 892.3 3"SPCG 892.0 R/GHT OF ACCESS TO S TA TE OF 4/1/NNESO TA PER DOC. NO. 57020/ col - 895.0 TC TC 895.1 ar co 94.9 1 895.0 x 892.7 3"SPCG 895 8 TC /2"W 11 I GAS WV UGC RIP RAP LEGEND AIS BH CONC CB CBX CMP DIP EMH FES FOL GP HCR HCS HHC HYD LP PVC RCP SAN SAN S SKIM SMH ST S TC TRANS UGC UGE WV ARB COT CRAB MPL PINR SPCB SPCG TR 2"CRAB Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes Denotes POND advertisement/information sign beehive catch basin concrete surface catch basin communication box corrugated metal pipe ductile iron pipe electric manhole flared end section fiber optic line gutter guard post handicap ramp handicap sign communication hand hole fire hydrant light pole polyvinylchloride pipe reinforced concrete pipe sanitary manhole sanitary sewer skimmer storm manhole storm sewer top of curb transformer box underground communication underground electric line water line water valve Arborvitae Cottonwood tree Crabapple tree Maple tree Red Pine tree Colorado Blue Spruce tree Colorado Green Spruce tree deciduous tree 0 Denotes iron monument set marked with P.L.S. No. 15480 • Denotes found iron monument VICINITY Al 11P DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per First American Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance Commitment No. NCS-650549-MPLS, commitment date January 15, 2014) (Parcel 1) Outlot A, MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract Property) (Parcel 2) Lot 2, Block 1, NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract and Torrens Property-Torrens Certificate of Title No. 99068)) Property is located in Dakota County, Minnesota. PLAT RECORDING INFORMATION The plat of NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION was filed of record on February 9, 1994 as Document No. 1193222. And The plat of MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION was filed of record on November 6, 1998 as Document No. 1548629. [ ] Bearings and/or dimensions listed within brackets are per plat or record documents. TITLE COMMITMENT First American Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance File No. NCS-650549-MPLS, effective date January 15, 2014, was relied upon as to matters of record. Schedule B Exceptions: Exceptions are indicated on survey with circled numbers where applicable. 10.) Drainage and utility easement as shown on the recorded plats of Mendota Heights Industrial Park, Mendota Heights Technology Center, and Mendota Technology Center 2nd Addition (Parcel 1). I 1.) Limitation of access to Interstate Highway No. 494 acquired by the State of Minnesota in condemnation, as evidenced of record by Partial Final Certificate dated May 22, 1979, recorded June 14, 1979, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 539006, and as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 19-33, recorded November 5, 1980, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 570201 (Parcel 1). 12.) Easements, and rights incidental thereto, in favor of Northern States Power Company, as contained in Pipeline Easement dated October 25, 1984, recorded February 13, 1985, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 678657; which easement rights were assigned by Xcel Energy, Inc., formerly Northern States Power Company, to Northern States Power Company, formerly Northern Power Corporation, now doing business as Xcel Energy, by Assignment and Assumption of Easements dated December 29, 2000, recorded August 23, 2001, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 1805118 (Parcels 1,2). 13.) Declaration of Covenants dated October 31, 1978, recorded December 21, 1978, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 528779, and Declaration of Covenants dated December 23, 1986, recorded January 15, 1987, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 762195, both of the above described Declarations were amended by Amended, Extended and Restated Declaration of Covenants dated July 31, 1987, recorded August 6, 1987, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No.799509, and recorded August 26, 1987, in the office of the Registrar of Titles as Document No. 191646 (Parcels 1,2). NOTE: The above declaration provides for a private charge or assessment. 15.) Drainage and utility easements, as shown on the recorded plat of Northland Drive Addition (Parcel 2). 16.) Highway Right -of -Way as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 19-33 recorded November 5, 1980, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No.57020I , and recorded November 5, 1980, in the office of the Registrar of Titles as Document No. 112891, and highway right of way and limitation of access rights acquired by the State of Minnesota and the terms, conditions, and restrictions contained in Final Certificate dated November 16, 1984, recorded February 14, 1985, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 678733 (Parcel 2). line 17.) Declaration of Covenants dated December 23, 1985, recorded April 9, 1986, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No.722045 (Parcel 2) 18.) Easement for signage monument, and rights incidental thereto, created in Declaration of Easement dated December 30, 1983, recorded January 15, 1987, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 762197 (Parcel 2). (Lies northwest of subject property) GENERAL NOTES .) Ad joining ownership information shown hereon was obtained from the Dakota County Property Tax Information web site. Ownership information is subject to revision upon receipt of a title search by a title insurance company. 0 ce NO SCALE MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD 0 cc Lu cc Lu 0 EXECUTIVE 0 NOR DRI VE 40 SCALE 0 IN 40 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION 80 FEET 2.) Survey coordinate & bearing basis: Dakota County System 3.) At the time field work was performed for this survey, there was a significant amount of snow on the ground. Physical features were located to the best of our ability, but there may be additional features that were not visible and, therefore, not shown hereon. 4.) We have shown the current zoning classification of the property and building setback requirements, height and floor space area restrictions as set forth in that classification in the zoning notes section of the survey based on our own research; however, we have not included item 6(0 in the survey certification because zoning information has not been provided to us by the insurer as called for in the 2011 ALTA requirements. UTILITY NOTES 1.) Utility information from plans and markings was combined with observed evidence of utilities to develop a view of the underground utilities shown hereon. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, excavation may be necessary. 2.) Other underground utilities of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3.) Some underground utility locations are shown as marked onsite by those utility companies whose locators responded to our Gopher State One Call, ticket number 140170389. 4.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 (800-252-1166) for precise onsite location of utilities prior to any excavation. FLOOD ZONE NOTE 1.) The sub ject property appears to lie within Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per the National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 2701100081E, dated December 2, 2011. This information was obtained from the FEMA Map Service Center web site. ZONING NOTES 1.) Zoning information obtained from the City of Mendota Heights web site on January 17, 2014. The sub ject property is zoned 1 -INDUSTRIAL. 2.) The setbacks for zone 1 -INDUSTRIAL are: Building: Front = 40 feet Side = 30 feet -interior - 40 feet Abutting a street Rear = 50 feet - 100 feet Abutting an R district Restrictions (i.e., building setbacks, height and bulk restrictions, etc.) shown hereon are based on information provided and are sub ject to interpretation. We cannot certify to a restriction on the basis of an interpretation or the opinion of another party. AREA 361,910 sq. ft. or 8.308 acres LIST OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS The following list of possible encroachments is only the opinion of this surveyor; should not be interpreted as a legal opinion and should not be interpreted as a complete listing. Possible encroachments are indicated on survey with boxed letters as listed below. A.) Storm sewer crosses east property line near northeast corner of property. B.) Underground communication line appaers to cross east property line. C.) Surface drainage to outlet pipe crosses east property line. To: United Land, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company and First American Title Insurance This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2011 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/ACSM Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11(b) and 13 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on January 21, 2014. Dated this 3 I th day of January, 2014. SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. By: 721-4- A Att..6.„ Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 15480 Revision 1 8y 1 Date Drawing Title: ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR' UNITED PROPERTIES MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CEIVTER JIbLWIY,PS ( Project: 2008-298-A Bk/Pg: 814/17, 44 Main Office: 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (35W)• Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526) West Office: Mandan, North Dakota 701-663-5562 Township:28 Range: 23 Section:34 File: 2008298A002.dwg 01/31/2014 Sheet: 1 of 1 1/31/2014 3:16:26 PM CST N:\2008\2008298\2008296A\Dwgs\200 Page 101 COR OF T. 28, R. 23 ZONED: /-INDUST'/AL A Ar -A /r ,n nA / /r-// I 17-^ /V/L_/ VL/l/ //-I `7L_/ 7r7 / BITUMINO• E-A /Tr -0 ♦ A vL_/ V / L_/ \ z. V mo co oa CO 0 UhZ 4 / n Lv1\ 1240 86 241 TC 869.7 1242 870.2 TC /2/9.24TC TC 89°51'46"W 872.3 871.5 2 /n/[ VL_.:.� LP / t -7-a L _ / / A FM /7-//1 n / /-IL/lJI / /l.// V (PUBLIC ROAD) E/VTERPR/SE ROAD BM#3 TC 872.4 TC TC 872.7 HYD / 871.8 .870.6 x871.5 FND IRON MON R.L.S. 1 X5480 ).4 x' • 870.2 _GAS- TC 871.0 TC �7 TOP=870.8 872.4 1 ,Pr72.0 WV j 872> SAN / TOP=873 7 /NV=860 05 N /NV=865.5 /NV=860.7 5 DROP PIPE ro wv SAN 40 TC TC 875 0 875.1 / /-- L_ L/ / /1 / LI EXISTING l DING I ° TR �" I ° SPR GRASS TR ° L ^SPR pl w^ ER: MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS, LLC DI °SPR P1D#27-48300-04-100 1I T TC 876.0 TC TC 876.9 877.8 ° TR TC 878.6 Lp TC 879.4 A Ar -A 1 /--17-A 1VIL_/ VL/ / //-I TR TC 88• I /2" W / B" SANS 1877 I 875.3 /NV=866.4 8 .i�r;;�;,• 70.9 ! & \� 8 1.0 'L•'. =1��1 874.0 [,f /89°50'27"EJ 872.5TC 1 12'PVG CL TOP /NV=865.6 872.0 TC ;x871. < TC 871.9 872.1 (-/) TC TC 872.10 872.7 z 872.7 TC 4 CB TOP=87/. 8 /NV=866.3 OVER 'NG ■ 872.8 TC W 872.9 TC BTL 873.4 COR 873.8 874.I C friA J LzLz cn c,< O W�h r�v O ZZ O � mmL \ 1 BENCH MARKS (Bench marks shown 1.) Top of top Elevation = 2.) Top of top Elevation = 3.) Top of top Elevation = 1n reference x CO O fri h -14u nin H 0 ov QoL 8 N ICO - H co m 873.0 5 ao TC TC 873.7 87122 Lu 1- Lu C' U z O U U I'M :0 -x R •I 872 CBX 0 73.�_� SMH x 874.4 • TOP=87.4 7"COT INV -8 4.8 �► 9.91 ° 875.1'x 7"CO 72.9 tJ SAN l 874. UGC UGC 12'PVC ST Ste. x 875.9 RB 87.9 873.1 ARB uom CC c0 Lj 0 rn COCO 874.0 29.3 0 W ' 874. I T 873.8 ■ 8' SPCB 12A3 CB 874.2 fww® COR 1113 61 872.9 WOOD WALL 872.3 CB TOP=87/ / /NV=865.35 872.7 011193) TC LP 1196 • 198 872.2 TC TC TC II6di° 5 872.8 0 TC of, H'0 0 oo • -8"MPL 0.7 875.2 CB / TOP=873.4 /NV=867.2 E /NV=863.8 N /NV=867.6 NE /NV=864.2 S / 875.5 SAN / TOP=873.8 /NV=866.3 SMH / TOP=874.6 /NV=864.5 W /NV=864.4 N 2-1 "COT x 875.3 87,.7 6.2 6"COT 876.1 8"COT 875.9 1 5"COT x 875.5 873.8 2-6"PINR x 875.3 74.1 'PINR / 2-6"ELM 875.6 x 875.3/ 875.0 / 8"ELM 874.5 r "CRAB 876.4 74.7 "CRAB \ 874. 4'C AB •• 8 4.4 8".PCB / :.94 3/ � I � �x 877.2 ■ 877.2 5-9"EL1 SPrB I x 8\7 I I 876.0 / x 876 x} 876.0 x/75.9 x 876.3 x 876.3 876.7 x 876.6 x ( • 9 877.8 876.4 x876.6 2-15"COT 875. 875.3 7"COT II"COT Ili, 874.9 8 17"COT 87163 15"CO 876.1 G.45 UGC r 8 7.1 �w878.1I 40 ek '.4'44.....1-11. w �., 8ICO1 OTT 878.' C/ 17"COT 882.5 I1'COT I R777 'COT 876 (PUBL/CL k DEDICATED) 78.0 879.0 21 "RCP ST I 7'877.0 88176 880.9 TC / / r-/ [7L_ / r 49 6,E'• IoD'S'/A x 830.6 G TC 882.0 TC 881 x 880.1 881.4 DkVE [N89°50'27"E N89° 51 '46 "E \ 585.9 877.9 HCS HCS C3 PKSrroSPRPK' GRASS TR '^V - -7 -7 /A / / / ^T*)/ A / l/ V L./ 1 \1LL_ / /1 T TC TC 2 cs TOP=882.6 s YD TC TC 9 882.6 883.1 /NV=879. / TC 883.8 1 ALJ/�. / /-1 / \ / \ OWNER: ti I Ce (ENDO TA D#27-4 OF 330 ICE HO -/04- DI 90 SPRTR SP to TC 884.7 *LP S JUPITER DRIVE _LC TC TC GRASS 885. 886. (PRIVATE ROAD) BM#1 TC TC 887.9 888.3 e WV 882.4 CB 883.3 SAN TOP=882. TOP=8 0 /NV=877. / E /NV=86 .6 /NV=876.9 W /NV=877.2 N CB X878.8 880.0 88 88 lMMMEMEMEMM-1 GAS 1 877.2 877.6 x 877: 14"C 877.4COT / x 877.1 1 877.0 I x 877.1 x877.4 x 877.5 x 878.3 x 878.6 878.3 878= / 3-16"COT x877.9 I I '878.0 x878.7/ INR x 878/ x 879.4 878.0 8775 x 878.3 76.8 9 73 / di TC 873.0 1-00 HB 875.4 x 8"MPL 8174) )>( 878./ / / 1 / („4../ ix 879. 778.8 x 879 se x 878.2 Ji x 880.5 881.0 x 881.2 x 881.7 / x 882.8 NGVD 1929 Datum) FND 1/2 OPEN IRON nut of hydrant; NW corner of Jupiter Dr & Northland Dr. 891.62 feet nut of hydrant; N side of Northland Dr., 2nd hydrant W of Jupiter Dr. 884.81 feet nut of hydrant; NW corner of Enterprise Dr & Northland Dr. 874.72 feet x 881.3 x 881.9 x 882.1 x 883.6 x 883.2 879.3 879(.6 880.0 879 9 880.1 x x 879.6 x 79.9 880.0 V/ I C x 879.1 881.2 9"COT 881. 880.8 881.0 80.9 "ELM x 879.7 881.2 88.3 ••.. 4"COT 879.9 UGE� 8 UGC jLtih!_ s 2 I"r 882.8 �+• I I "COT2 5 2-9" 2-7"COT 8:1.3 47' 1 1 "COT 1 9"COT 68'.' 881.8 \9.. nT 885.0 884.4 88 . BITUMNOUS 882.2 2.6 DR AGE & T1LITY EASE ENT PER , 7 x 81.7 883.9 ler C 7 : 882.5 81.9 x82.9 STO KPILE 7\8 .9 0 / x 8845 0 4.6 x 884 x898. co ix87.2 ( 1 1 • 1 /G877id 8 /////ka9.5 I()\ t(f co x888.5 \ V / x 887( " 8/9 880.8 y \ \ \ / ";? 7 1 ,4//8„91 )3c (886.87a7- \ , 9 Iiiiiir8/484. x 88N 88.04 it x 882.7 • x 182.6 x 883.0 x 883.1 x 884, x 883.7 x 884.7 x 884.7 x 884.2 49 x 884.7 84.7 • 889 • 0. • • 894.5 1110,`.6N 1111 9°6.4 YO 111\819718 \1 \ 896a / r:3:53.31(11/15'\\'\ /7< j11896 2 4110 \- 904. 904. x 895.2 ix 88\8.6 884. \x);3.4 88'7 x 884.5 885.0 NSP CO. P/PEL/NE EA MENT PER DOC. No • 78657 / x 884.7/ 885 I 9 00.0 899. x 884.5 x 884.6 x 885.2 95. 884.9 x 886.4 84.9 x 886.4 89 L8 4.9 894.0 ( 9 891.7 891 /87P ST S X83 0 883.3 883.9 8 GAS UGC-� 884.4 UGC FND IRON MON R.L.S. 15480 UGC 886.3 CB \\ TOP=88.9 /NV=880.5 S INV -879.5\ __16/V -879.6E WV 8" SAN S 887./3 889.0 HYD SAN SA TOP=889.2 /NV=87/.3 W /NV=87/.9 S' BOT=862.9 ■ SPR OWNER: MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS LL C P/D#27-48300-104-080 n4 TR ■SPR TR LP L l/ / CHH a LP 0 TCS o ° TR x 889.7 890.4 DRAINAGE & UTIL/r EASEMENT PER MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER & MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION SKIMMER RA 86 x 884.7 A 887.0 MENDOTA HEIGHT INDUSTRIAL P4RK, 2ND ADDITION. (i(Th x 887.4 887.9" • 85. 3-6rF 887.6 x 887.5 x 188 L 889 4 TC 889.0 TC 888.4 888868LI / 134DC x 892.4 txR9I BL2 j )8 118 (FL _193 ( • // //*V1" j 8 4" 1/87 48'6-5 //////!/ PI! Old IL) / !IN 888.3x1 888.8 :Br 4.11871,i3 I 101 890.3 890. 894.6 I I jx 2 4906 \\\ \\:\(1\\ \C\\ \ x 8(2 oi I 889k7cro3 pi 906.1 5.2 x 8-7/.89.71/// /78(6/).;7690x)/1:18:/:188/689//0 8(B\ B7.7" 88'6.4 x 181-712 f8,81 401 "co.\ all/ I 897 ir • 8 4:13}\ . 1 8996. .899B.:12 •Q.9,\NI., 9\0, 01". x 88889.08 8 80t. 889.4 7.6 • Nt5o 71\11 let93.8 Ar- x 889.9 891.4" x 891.7 • 18fil.38x99.9P (\4-5.-7„ 890.A c(c 888.1 LL x jK\ Lu 889 144 x 885.3 x 8135.6 x 886.4 x 886.5 (887.0 886.0 x 886.6 x 887.3 x 886.2 x 887. 8 x 886) 3"TR x 188.0 6.8 891.3 IS 889. 891.99< ( 94.5 92.1 892.9 ) 8*3 89I.2x 893 Qi A 890.4 o x 888.8 x 888.5 83 9 596.3 x 889.5 7 (1130 IM • 0 89 L9 892.0 TC TC TC 889. Cg cp x 890.4 TC 89 6 TC 90.9 co CB CB cTi CON C CURB 00 TC .3"MRIC 892.0 892.0 / x 891.4q0 892.5 TC 890 92.8 TC WOOD G GE 891.1 CO 892. TC TC TC 3•mpL 891. 892A4‘92.6 LP in 14;;911 CO 3uMPL 1 891.1 TC TC 18 ' illi s€i TC TC 8 5,18 R B ig) r?..1?.. • 5 coo col - 3"MPL 4 3"SPCG 6 c3 uci) 893.0 g3 TC 891.8 csi TC 893 csi 892.2 12.3 2" RAB x 891.5 x 891.6 893 893. 2"07 8913.5. 10.0 891. HHC 92. co 892.8 • 1.6 co cno x 92.8 in 888.0 • 893. TC 94.7 R/GHT OF ACCESS TO STATE OF A/I/NNE 0 TA PER DOC. NO. 6 733 0 I- LLI OC CC LU o Z 11-1 OC frI TA/86°55'07"W 371.58] 886.2 88 9 887.5 • 4 FT CHAIN LINK FENCE FND 1/2 INCH REBAR (PUBL/CXY DEDICATED) /NTERSTA7E H/GHWAY / 494 389.7 2/5.25 891.5 DEVELOPER Se DESIGNER: United Properties 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Minneapolis, MN 55431 Attention: Brandon Champeau Phone: 952-831-1000 TC 93.1 co 3"Mi-c-)Pcnr93.6 893.7 02.5 TC 00) 891.4 TC 893.5 )894. 'MPL TC 893.2 8 .1394.2 in Lc) on 895.2 95.3 co TC C coo col - 895.0 TC TC 895.1 col - to 3.7x 894.4 4.3 8943 • 94.9 895 0 D ---IRON MON R.L.S. 162135 x 892.3 895 8 TC x 892.7 R/GHT OF ACCESS TO STATE OF 4/1/NNESOTA PER DOC. NO. 57020/ co CB ■ TR ■ SPR /2"W WV WV GAS UGC 3"MPL RIP RAP LEGEND AIS Denotes BH Denotes CONC Denotes CB Denotes CBX Denotes CMP Denotes DIP Denotes EMH Denotes FES Denotes FOL Denotes Denotes GP Denotes HCR Denotes HCS Denotes HHC Denotes HYD Denotes LP Denotes PVC Denotes RCP Denotes SAN Denotes SAN S Denotes SKIM Denotes SMH Denotes ST S Denotes TC Denotes TRANS Denotes UGC Denotes UGE Denotes Denotes WV Denotes ARB Denotes COT Denotes CRAB Denotes MPL Denotes PINR Denotes SPCB Denotes SPCG Denotes TR Denotes 2"CRAB POND 2"CRAB advertisement/information sign beehive catch basin concrete surface catch basin communication box corrugated metal pipe ductile iron pipe electric manhole flared end section fiber optic line gutter guard post handicap ramp handicap sign communication hand hole fire hydrant light pole polyvinylchloride pipe reinforced concrete pipe sanitary manhole sanitary sewer skimmer storm manhole storm sewer top of curb transformer box underground communication line underground electric line water line water valve Arborvitae Cottonwood tree Crabapple tree Maple tree Red Pine tree Colorado Blue Spruce tree Colorado Green Spruce tree deciduous tree 0 Denotes iron monument set marked with P.L.S. No. 15480 • Denotes found iron monument VICINITY MAP 0 0 No KALE !. Ls>. NO SCALE MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD cc EXECUTIVE 0 NOR DRIVE 40 SCALE 0 ,7 IN 40 80 FEET DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED (Per First American Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance Commitment No. NCS-650549-MPLS, commitment date January 15, 2014) (Parcel 1) Outlot A, MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract Property) (Parcel 2) Lot 2, Block 1, NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. (Abstract and Torrens Property-Torrens Certificate of Title No. 99068)) Property is located in Dakota County, Minnesota. PLAT RECORDING INFORMATION The plat of NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION was filed of record on February 9, 1994 as Document No. 1193222. And The plat of MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION was filed of record on November 6, 1998 as Document No. 1548629. [ ] Bearings and/or dimensions listed within brackets are per plat or record documents. TITLE COMMITMENT First American Title Insurance Company Commitment for Title Insurance File No. NCS-650549-MPLS, effective date January 15, 2014, was relied upon as to matters of record. Schedule B Exceptions: Exceptions are indicated on survey with circled numbers where applicable. 10.) Drainage and utility easement as shown on the recorded plats of Mendota Heights Industrial Park, Mendota Heights Technology Center, and Mendota Technology Center 2nd Addition (Parcel 1). I 1.) Limitation of access to Interstate Highway No. 494 acquired by the State of Minnesota in condemnation, as evidenced of record by Partial Final Certificate dated May 22, 1979, recorded June 14, 1979, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 539006, and as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 19-33, recorded November 5, 1980, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 570201 (Parcel 1). 12.) Easements, and rights incidental thereto, in favor of Northern States Power Company, as contained in Pipeline Easement dated October 25, 1984, recorded February 13, 1985, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 678657; which easement rights were assigned by Xcel Energy, Inc., formerly Northern States Power Company, to Northern States Power Company, formerly Northern Power Corporation, now doing business as Xcel Energy, by Assignment and Assumption of Easements dated December 29, 2000, recorded August 23, 2001, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 1805118 (Parcels 1,2). 13.) Declaration of Covenants dated October 31, 1978, recorded December 21, 1978, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 528779, and Declaration of Covenants dated December 23, 1986, recorded January 15, 1987, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 762195, both of the above described Declarations were amended by Amended, Extended and Restated Declaration of Covenants dated July 31, 1987, recorded August 6, 1987, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No.799509, and recorded August 26, 1987, in the office of the Registrar of Titles as Document No. 191646 (Parcels 1,2). NOTE: The above declaration provides for a private charge or assessment. 15.) Drainage and utility easements, as shown on the recorded plat of Northland Drive Addition (Parcel 2). 16.) Highway Right -of -Way as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 19-33 recorded November 5, 1980, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No.57020I , and recorded November 5, 1980, in the office of the Registrar of Titles as Document No. 112891, and highway right of way and limitation of access rights acquired by the State of Minnesota and the terms, conditions, and restrictions contained in Final Certificate dated November 16, 1984, recorded February 14, 1985, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 678733 (Parcel 2). 17.) Declaration of Covenants dated December 23, 1985, recorded April 9, 1986, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No.722045 (Parcel 2) 18.) Easement for signage monument, and rights incidental thereto, created in Declaration of Easement dated December 30, 1983, recorded January 15, 1987, in the office of the County Recorder as Document No. 762197 (Parcel 2). (Lies northwest of subject property) GENERAL NOTES 1.) Ad joining ownership information shown hereon was obtained from the Dakota County Property Tax Information web site. Ownership information is subject to revision upon receipt of a title search by a title insurance company. 2.) Survey coordinate & bearing basis: Dakota County System 3.) At the time field work was performed for this survey, there was a significant amount of snow on the ground. Physical features were located to the best of our ability, but there may be additional features that were not visible and, therefore, not shown hereon. 4.) We have shown the current zoning classification of the property and building setback requirements, height and floor space area restrictions as set forth in that classification in the zoning notes section of the survey based on our own research; however, we have not included item 6(0 in the survey certification because zoning information has not been provided to us by the insurer as called for in the 2011 ALTA requirements. UTILITY NOTES 1.) Utility information from plans and markings was combined with observed evidence of utilities to develop a view of the underground utilities shown hereon. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, excavation may be necessary. 2.) Other underground utilities of which we are unaware may exist. Verify all utilities critical to construction or design. 3.) Some underground utility locations are shown as marked onsite by those utility companies whose locators responded to our Gopher State One Call, ticket number 140170389. 4.) Contact GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 651-454-0002 (800-252-1166) for precise onsite location of utilities prior to any excavation. FLOOD ZONE NOTE The sub ject property appears to lie within Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per the National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map Community Panel No. 2701100081E, dated December 2, 2011. This information was obtained from the FEMA Map Service Center web site. ZONING NOTES 1.) Zoning information obtained from the City of Mendota Heights web site on January 17, 2014. The sub ject property is zoned 1 -INDUSTRIAL. 2.) The setbacks for zone 1 -INDUSTRIAL are: Building: Front = 40 feet Side = 30 feet -interior - 40 feet Abutting a street Rear = 50 feet - 100 feet Abutting an R district Restrictions (i.e., building setbacks, height and bulk restrictions, etc.) shown hereon are based on information provided and are sub ject to interpretation. We cannot certify to a restriction on the basis of an interpretation or the opinion of another party. AREA 361,910 sq. ft. or 8.308 acres LIST OF POSSIBLE ENCROACHMENTS The following list of possible encroachments is only the opinion of this surveyor; should not be interpreted as a legal opinion and should not be interpreted as a complete listing. Possible encroachments are indicated on survey with boxed letters as listed below. A.) Storm sewer crosses east property line near northeast corner of property. B.) Underground communication line appaers to cross east property line. C.) Surface drainage to outlet pipe crosses east property line. I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 3Ist day of January, 2014. SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. By: AfEtil.„,_ Mark S. Hanson, P.L.S. Minn. Lic. No. 15480 (Revision By Dote 6-24-2009 Drawing Title: OF MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 4TH ADDITION If LANS D SURVEYING www.sunde.com (Project: 2008-298-A Main Office: 9001 East Bloomington Freeway (35W) • Suite 118 Bloomington, Minnesota 55420-3435 952-881-2455 (Fax: 952-888-9526) West Office: Mandan North Dakota 701-663-5562 Bk/Pg: 814/17 Township:28 Range: 23 Date: 01/31/2014 File: 2008298A00I.dwg Sheet: 1 of 1 \ O I 0 L.1.1 N Z H O U IX�a W Z w ~0 ro 0 N o w w 0 r) 3Ow A 4 -A /I /l 7-/1 / /r-//"/ /T^ lvlL_l VL/L/ T7L_lvr7 r AITrCl C.: 1I V ...'L./ V / L_ l \ 7A/n n nn/T/n A / / VLJ /-ILJL/l / l L.// V -V\ 1- z w w o SMO w N � Z � O O ? (n J w�Q 2 0 z O0 (f U) 1219.24 S89°50'27"W 0 co MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTEH 4TH ADDITION A Ar -A ll -17-17- A / /r-//\/ /T^ /A /rm / l ^TLS/ /1 / /V/L_l VL/l/ //-1 `7L_/ 7`7 / .-: // VL/U,) / / 1// -IL_ A/C) / / / /iAIn / V l/ / \ / `7 L _/-I / VLA N89050 '27 "E rl0/1 /r- // \ / V L_ 585.97 O co (597.68 NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION) N00 °09'33 "W 0 In 0 / 717- L_l.// l fl/'//' L.L_\ J \1 \`- DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PER MENDOTA HEIGHTS INDUSTRIAL PARK & NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION LOT 1 7 0 G SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF S. 34, T. 28, R. 23 — NORTHERN STATES POWER CO. PIPELINE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 678657- \ 1'/86 °5/ 2/ "W 37/.53 (371.58 NORTHLAND DR/VE ADDITION) /A /T/ --TA Tr— / / V / L_ / 1 / /-1 / L_ A .//A /A /r "-. /V///V/VL_..:t✓ /-I / ///l / ///1//1 \/ /-7/ L /-7 v v/—I / /I D-7-4 4 r -A /T _ /I AL/L /-1/ 1 / /V/L/ V / V/` / /-I/ V/Li/ 1 //-I / -7-//--1 /A / L)/ 4T A//Th V L- /VL.i. �� — i NI /1 / / 7-/ /1 T lJ CJ / L _ LJ / 1 A NI l /V82 °3338„ (2/s /B W 2/5.25 - NORTHLAND DRIVE ADD/T/ON) A/� / VL/, / /T /1/17f7/ /-) r- /- 14/ \ YY/ -I / DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION AND RECORDS NI DO co SO °00134 "E 0 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 9, taxes payable in the year have been paid. Also, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 272.12, there are no day of , 20__. 60 SCALE 0 IN 60 120 FEET FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N89°50'27"E O DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 16 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET MARKED WITH PLS NO. 15480, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT, UNLESS • OTHERWISE NOTED w J O O z M N o N M U w N M N c N N K) U w (/7 VICINI T Y MAP -J \0,4 IA nI ,.Y Al IT T _/ TERSTA N0. I �Y nI E HIGHWAY 494 I �Y AI 20___ on the land hereinbefore described delinquent taxes and transfer entered this Department of Property Taxation and Records COUNTY RECORDER, COUNTY OF DAKOTA, STATE OF MINNESOTA Director I hereby certify that this plat of MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 4TH ADDITION was filed in the office of the Office of the County Recorder for public record on this day of , 20__, at o'clock __.M., and was duly filed in Book of Plats, Page as Document Number County Recorder, Dakota County, Minnesota KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Northland Land Company, a Minnesota corporation, owner and proprietor, of the following described property situated in the County of Dakota, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 2, Block 1, NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. AND Outlot A, MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as MENDOTA TECHNOLOGY CENTER 4TH ADDITION and does hereby dedicate to the public, for public use, the easements as shown on this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof said Northland Land Company, a Minnesota corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of , 20__. Northland Land Company, a Minnesota corporation By: its By: its STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20__, by and by of said Northland Land Company, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of said corporation. Notary Public, County, My Commission Expires: 1, Mark S. Hanson, do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20___. Mark S. Hanson, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 15480 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on by Mark S. Hanson. Notary Public, Minnesota My Commission Expires: CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA This plat was approved by the City Council of Mendota Heights, Minnesota, this day of 20___, and hereby certifies compliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. Signed: Mayor COUNTY SURVEYOR Attest - City Clerk I hereby certify that in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subd. 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20__. BY: Todd B. Tollefson Dakota County Surveyor JJSUNDE LANDSURVEYING PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY COLOR TO MATCH FRAMES PAINTED SMOOTH PRECAST PANNEL PAINTED BAND BRICK FPREFINISHED METAL CAP FLASHING BRICK ROCKFACE BLOCK ACCENT 0 N - m 0- m 1 a 0 J IX Q EAST ELEVATION MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK Mendota Heights, Minnesota NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL COLORS NEED TO BE FIELD VERIFIED. BM#✓-�a<!).HYD 871.8 WV SAN 6 x 872.4 x TOP=87 .7 871.5 /NV=860.ON /NV=865.6 INV=860. 7 S DROP PIPE41/ SAN 875.0 875.1 876.0 876.9 877.8 878.6 .1'LP879.4 88. I CB 882.0 YD TOP=882.6 881.9 882.6 883.1 /NV=879. I / 884.7 *LP 885.7 886. 885.0 wv 871.7! "SPC 871. TW 75.00 BW 74.00 TW 75.00 BW 72.0 873.7 87 ARB co CO DO sr AR J TW 75.00 BW 72.00 874.1 TRANS 873.8 8"SPCB TW 76.00 BW 74.00 8' SANS ( 877. I TW 80.00 BW 75.00 / xAg1,11',_4_,,, 882.4 CB I II/C OP 82.0 Nv=a»/E INV=876.9 W .411/67A4 67A INV=866: 876.1 877.0 TW 78.00 BW 77.00 877.9 _- 878.8 880.0 88 CB TOP=8.9 INV=880.`5 S INV=879.5 INV=879.6 E TW 83. BW 75.00 885 _ 886.5 `moi � �fi��I1��i_.�r.s`i�i.<)y:Jr►�lVrz �►= iulr•�""ri^�=�1►,:ap oio' l26sz �i is ri ew•ter/_W ia'•raaffzau:r-r-r•• ��1, ��_ ♦� IJi 3 RCP S. 41107 •i -- .::10 �..� „, AparAPA .• f:�� ErmivIrl sgma.t it:afii, u�� tf� l/lr ' i I�/L7 aur •�: /yMM '. TW 76.00 BW 72.00 TW 83.00 /" / // / 879.9 • 7e.41 / /� UN C ►`�,j flx =%.' BW 75.00 1 ' /finn10---- � 4• r- '� -� /-/ ;17 TW 84.00 rr �_�_/ .�� "�--mrl;.,:�� BW 75.00f es't .TW 78.00 ��;:��:.,::.�� . �� !!r��• �,.m BW 75.00 mrvri7'/O//II�/A//lI�/ f ��, N lid!// / Iiireir I/mAPArmOJ►1 Q� ��;ew�a1'.wLOl� %;01... ��►�r� <lry/�ly;�.'L•r(LFakot a Pr GJ. go=Gur_A_rI►_�i_f 1IiO�4ir4it►v SKIMMER TOP=887 4 INV 2.0 888.2 S LP * 876.1 TW 78.50 BW 75.00 x 879.4 / x 882.3 2 883.0 .w..-._. sew.; • W.O. AREA TW 78.00 BW 72.00 8 x 876.3 1X877.1 x877.4 879.3 x x 87345 I K 8'PCB 8 w SPCB 873.7 • 8"SPCB - 873.5 8"SPCB 8 872.8 873.0 ("x 878.3 / / x/i83.9 / 881.2 j �� / �� •'� t �O i / �• / 883.7( %.:56 x8:4.6 / /887. I I I I I r 9.9 / :61.9 X 882.9 I I / I X 6$�/.2 1 / x 88215 / / / / / I / �.1 x7.4 / 88 .5 �� \/ /, / x 883.2 x /// f��) x 883.4/ 885.1 x ( //I\ x 4 I ' X886. • 4 I I I I \ �/ III 1111 \ �� j%x-8 W)II II II \ x 879.6 882 3 x / x !_83.8 0.57 x 882.4 0.1 xtj��)•� X 887.5 I - -$$6 p '-88E 1)3 887.4 N FFE /I I x868.5 \ / :80. • I I I co x 888.0 I / X 687y7' III t�i> II •• I 880.8 l I / x 887.7 x 887.3 x 880.5 co 8 8 788 xc0.9 / x579. s'1' //// I 1 ..Ill l III 904. x .• I/ i x 8 y� I I I 904905. I r2 7 x 88 I///I IJ 1 1903.5 I I/ I 885.98// /pi/ J9.9 I� �.� 1.5 l/ / 1 � 90� // 896 889./ :.5II1'/lI ///� 1 // x s- oo.s di 3 g•S7- b l / 896 .-3, / 00.0 / \ / 864.$ I\ 6 899 x896.2x 895. // / / .0 \s /x��, ��j// B x 886.5 888.\88 184.7/-LLI W X 'x37/\IX 88.•J.x /�x 88 .6\�� \� J k 893. 878x/ / X \ 1\ 889.7 g� `"J/ \ \ �X 884. x4.4 �\ 895.I/�/x 885.6 88x6.1 \ 88.4 95. I 891.$ I \ 886 \\ 890.3\\ I I f \.\5 d 4.9 d„ 1 \86.2 •---„,-\___-__________. -,8,8,5 .4 M`I X886.0 884.4 ..4.9 / x88 8 � \..x889.1 884.91 L >6 \ x884.5 \ x 886.6 x 884.7 x 884.0 x 884 2 x 688 x 891.7 x 892.6 i x 893.8 890.3 x 8 94.3 894.5 9 6\ \ 11 \\\ � III 7518x96 6 8 890.5 90 x 886.7 x 881.7 x 886.4 84.9 \ 1 x 885.3 ) 886.0 06.3 7.4 it• S 896.2 \ 891.1 891.1 906.2 I�Rnlrlint 7. .°� 906.X _gam In 9�x 90 5 6 ME X n,It ' 04.9 5.2� \ .: 'x%�.: l� 1.YY111i11��n 89 °E,,,y3-, .....:Alli 891.74I x B 8•, r I) t: . I) (jt_� .. a :. 17 8�2 891.4 891, UGC 3"SPC 3' 892.2 892.5 x 891.3 x 89 $882X \\ 889. X87,3:6 SHR 875.41 x 8"MPL x 878.1 lid 11.11 x 885.2 x 890.4 863.7-- x883.6�� 884.1 « x 890.5 CK 13.7x 8 PER DOC. N MEN 78657 x 885.8 x 887.3 x 888.5 x 888.9 x 889.5 880.7 882.2 x 886.4 x 890.3 x 891.4 7 • 884.0 R/GHT OF ACCESS TO STA TE OF M/NNESOTA PER DOC. A/O. 6787.3,3 26'GAS 885.4 886.2 t 887.5 A 88:.1 INTERSTATE H(/GHCYUVAA TED) Y NO 494 -1 A x 890.5 x 892.3 A A 8� A Q-6 Q 892.0 3"SPCG 1 1GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C 1 1-.40' GENERAL NOTES: 1. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL, PAVEMENT REMOVAL, AND UTILITY REMOVAL LIMITS ARE TO BE COORDINATED THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND UTILITY OWNER. REFER TO ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN WHILE WORKING WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO STREET ENCROACHMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING AND REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR ITEMS THAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ANTICIPATED BY PERFORMING THE ABOVE. 4. THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE INDICATED ON THE PLAN IS SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FOR THE EXACT ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE LOCATION. PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILTATION FENCE PROPERTY LINE SAWCUT LINE (APPROX.) PROPOSED CONTOUR STORM SEWER RETAINING WALL CATCH BASIN MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION FLARED END SECTION WITH RIPRAP EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TEMPORARY) EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (PERMANENT) ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DRAINAGE FLOW ARROW RETAINING WALL SPOT ELEVATION SPOT ELEVATION SOIL BORING CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA ■® • 0.0.0.0•0 ••••• TW 77.00 BW 76.50 SB -1 CONCRETE •' W.O. AREA *NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. 40' 20' 0 40' 80' SCALE 1"=40' ABBREVIATIONS BLDG BM BW CB CONC ELEV EOF EX FFE HWL INV MAX MH MIN PVC RCP TW W.O. Building Bench Mark Bottom of Wall Catch Basin Concrete Elevation Emergency Overflow Existing Finished Floor Elevation High Water Level Invert Maximum Manhole Minimum Polyvinyl Chloride Reinforced Concrete Pipe Top of Wall Washout APPROXIMATE DISTURBED AREA IS 8.40 ACRES DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO START OF DEMOLITION, ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ARE TO BE INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTED BY THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND DAKOTA COUNTY ALL SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND INSPECTED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE CONTOUR. 2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ASCERTAIN THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION, ELEVATION AND MARK ALL EXISTING UTILITIES 48 HOURS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION STARTS. THE ENGINEER, ARCHITECT OR OWNER DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL THE UTILITIES ARE MAPPED, OR IF MAPPED, ARE SHOWN CORRECTLY. CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 FOR FIELD LOCATING EXISTING UTILITIES. CONTACT UTILITY OWNER IF DAMAGE OCCURS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. THERE MAY BE MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO BE REMOVED THAT ARE NOT IDENTIFIED ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE AND REVIEW THE DOCUMENTS TO OBTAIN A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF THE INTENDED SCOPE OF WORK. 4. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, DISCONNECT ALL GAS AND ELECTRIC SERVICES. COORDINATE DISCONNECTION OF EACH UTILITY WITH THE UTILITY OWNER. 5. ANY UTILITIES NOT INDICATED FOR REMOVAL OR ABANDONMENT, ARE TO BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES. 6. ALL EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER IS TO BE REMOVED WITHIN THE THE SAW CUT LINES TO THE NEAREST JOINT. 7. THE BACKGROUND INFORMATION WAS PREPARED BY SUNDE LAND 8. ALL WORK IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY IS TO BE COORDINATED HEIGHTS. ROADWAY REPAIRS, BOULEVARD REPAIRS, AND TRAFFIC MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SCOPE OF THE PROJECT FROM SURVEYING. (952) 881-2455. WITH THE CITY OF MENDOTA CONTROL ARE TO BE PER CITY OF GRADING NOTES: 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE, REVIEW ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO BIDDING. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE GIVEN FOR WORK THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY A SITE VISIT OR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT REVIEW. 2. PROTECT ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES WHICH ARE NOT SCHEDULED FOR REMOVAL. 3. NOTIFY CITY BUILDING INSPECTOR BEFORE TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION WORK COMMENCES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 4. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN AS 82.10, FOR EXAMPLE, ARE TO BE UNDERSTOOD TO MEAN 882.10. 5. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG THE CURB -LINE INDICATE THE ELEVATION OF THE GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. NO LANDSCAPED SLOPES ARE TO EXCEED 4:1 (4 FEET HORIZONTAL TO 1 FOOT VERTICAL) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 7. HANDICAP PARKING AREAS SHALL NOT HAVE SLOPES IN ANY DIRECTION THAT EXCEED 2%. 8. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM BUILDINGS AT ALL TIMES. 9. UPON COMPLETION OF THE GRADING AND UTILITY WORK, THE DEVELOPER SHALL CERTIFY THAT ALL GRADING AND UTILITY WORK WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED GRADING AND UTILITY PERMITS. AN AS -BUILT GRADING AND UTILITY PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND DISTRIBUTION. 10. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS, ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES MUST BE IN PLACE AND FUNCTIONING. THE CITY WILL INSPECT THE SITE TO DETERMINE ITS SUITABILITY FOR BUILDING ACTIVITIES. IF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN INSTALLED AT THIS POINT, IT MAY BE NECESSARY TO WITHHOLD BUILDING PERMITS FOR VARIOUS LOTS TO ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR ADEQUATE SPACE TO PERFORM THIS WORK. 11. ALL DEBRIS CREATED IN THE PROCESS OF CLEARING AND GRADING THE SITE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. THIS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL THIS TYPE OF MATERIAL BE BURIED OR BURNED ON THE SITE. 12. THE INTENT IS TO STRIP AND SALVAGED TOPSOIL FOR POTENTIAL RE -SPREADING ON THE SITE, IF APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS. SIX INCHES OF TOPSOIL - AFTER COMPACTION - SHALL BE RE -SPREAD PRIOR TO SEEDING AND MULCHING. EXCESS TOPSOIL MAY BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE PROVIDING THERE IS ADEQUATE TOPSOIL REMAINING TO PROPERLY FINISH THE SITE AS NOTED ABOVE. THE TOPSOIL STRIPPING, STOCKPILING AND RE -SPREADING SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE TO, AND NOTED ON, THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ANY SPECIAL TOPSOIL OR PLANTING REQUIREMENTS. 13. ALL GRADING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR SITE EROSION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM RUNNING OFF ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. ANY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES MUST BE CORRECTED AND RESTORED AS SOON AS PERMISSION IS GRANTED FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER(S). 14. IF CONSTRUCTION OF THE SITE WORK PROCEEDS THROUGH THE WINTER MONTHS, ANY DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE BUILDING FOOTPRINTS ARE TO BE MINIMALLY STABILIZED PRIOR TO MARCH 1, AS FOLLOWS: AREAS PLANNED TO RECEIVE PAVEMENTS ARE TO HAVE CLASS 5 BASE INSTALLED; ALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED, STRAW MULCH PLACED, AND DISC -ANCHORED. 15. WINTER MULCHING: 15.A. SNOW MULCHING SHALL BE DEFINED AS MULCH MATERIAL SPREAD OVER THE TOP OF SNOW SO THAT THE MULCH MELTS THROUGH THE SNOW AND STICKS TO THE EXPOSED SOILS. 15.B. FROZEN GROUND MULCHING SHALL BE DEFINED AS MULCH MATERIAL SPREAD OVER FROZEN GROUND. MULCH MATERIALS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE DISC -ANCHORING INTO THE SOIL MAY BE PLACED WITHOUT MODIFICATION. MULCH MATERIALS THAT REQUIRE DISC -ANCHORING MAYBE ANCHORED WITH HYDRAULIC SOIL STABILIZERS OR MAY BE FROZEN TO THE SOIL BY APPLYING WATER, AT A RATE OF 2000 GALLONS PER ACRE, OVER THE MULCH AS A SUBSTITUTION FOR DISC -ANCHORING. 16. RETAINING WALLS AND APPROPRIATE SAFETY FENCING ALONG THE TOP OF WALLS ARE TO BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. SUBMIT RETAINING WALL SHOP DRAWINGS TO PROJECT TEAM PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT THE DISTURBED AREA AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. RETAINING WALL NOTES: 1. ALL TOP AND BOTTOM ELEVATIONS CORRESPOND TO THE RESPECTIVE GRADE ELEVATIONS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL. 2. THE BOTTOM ELEVATION IS THE ELEVATION OF THE LOW-GRADE SIDE OF THE WALL, NOT THE TOP ELEVATION OF THE BURIED BLOCK COURSE. 3. ALL RETAINING WALLS SHALL HAVE PROTECTIVE FENCING AT THE TOP WHERE THE VERTICAL HEIGHT EXCEEDS 30 INCHES. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 4. MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF WALL. KEYED NOTES KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY NO ON PLAN. 0 INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. REFER TO DETAIL 3/C4. E INSTALL SILT FENCE. REFER TO DETAIL 1/C4. E INSTALL INLET SEDIMENT PROTECTION. REFER TO DETAIL 2/C4. ® REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN. SAWCUT AND REMOVE AT NEAREST JOINT. INTENT IS TO ONLY REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER WHERE NEEDED FOR UTILITY AND DRIVE ENTRANCE INSTALLATION. ❑5 SAWCUT AND REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT IN ITS ENTIRETY TO THE APPROXIMATE EXTENTS SHOWN. INTENT IS TO REMOVE ONLY REMOVE PORTIONS OF PAVEMENT WHERE NEEDED FOR UTILITY AND DRIVE ENTRANCE INSTALLATION. © COORDINATE WITH WALL CONTRACTOR FOR ALL PIPE PENETRATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVE CATCH BASIN FRAME, CURB BOX, AND GRATE THEN RETURN TO THE CITY. PROTECT FOR REUSE AS CATCH BASIN. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN ON SHEET C2 FOR RECASTING DETAILS. ® EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN. PROTECT AT ALL TIMES. • APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF TEMPORARY CONTAINED CONCRETE WASH OUT BIN. REFER TO THE MINNESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR MORE DETAILS. SELF CONTAINED CONCRETE WASHOUTS ON CONCRETE DELIVERY TRUCKS IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO ON-SITE CONTAINMENT. 10 EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO REMAIN. PROTECT AT ALL TIMES. 11 INSTALL MN/DOT 3885 CATEGORY 2 TEMPORARY STRAW FIBER EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 12 INSTALL MN/DOT 3888 CLASS 1 PERMANENT EROSION STABILIZATION MAT. ADDITIONAL PERIODIC MAINTENANCE MAY BE REQUIRED AT OVERFLOW AREAS. 13 REMOVE EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE TO REMAIN. PROTECT AT ALL TIMES. WALKWAY NOTES: 1. GRADING CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR SO THAT ALL STEPS AND LANDINGS ARE SLOPED PER CODE. 2. ALL SIDEWALK LONGITUDINAL AND TRANSVERSE SLOPES ARE TO BE PER CODE. TREE REMOVAL: CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL TREES WITHIN PROPERTY LINE UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. REFER TO KEYED NOTE #8 OF SHEET 01. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY SITE GRADING OPERATIONS. THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION MUST BE NOTIFIED UPON COMPLETION OF THE INSTALLATION OF THE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES AND PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OPERATION BEING COMMENCED. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SCHEDULE A PRE -CONSTRUCTION GRADING MEETING ON-SITE WITH THE CITY AND LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. IF DAMAGED OR REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE RESTORED AND IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH DAY. 2. ANY EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE CITY OR LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION; BEFORE, DURING OR AFTER THE GRADING ACTIVITIES, SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THEIR REQUEST. 3. NO DEVIATIONS SHALL BE MADE FROM THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED GRADING PLAN, WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE CITY. 4. FOR SITES GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRE, AS REQUIRED BY THE MPCA PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, THE PERMIT APPLICANT MUST KEEP AN EROSION CONTROL INSPECTION LOG. INSPECTION MUST BE MADE ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER EVERY RAIN EVENT. THE INSPECTION RECORD MUST BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE CITY AND LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF REQUEST. 5. FLOWS FROM DIVERSION CHANNELS OR PIPES (TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT) SHALL BE ROUTED TO SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR APPROPRIATE ENERGY DISSIPATERS TO PREVENT TRANSPORT OF SEDIMENT TO OUTFLOW TO LATERAL CONVEYORS AND TO PREVENT EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION WHEN RUNOFF FLOWS INTO THESE CONVEYORS. 6. SITE ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE GRADED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCES, DIVERSION CHANNELS, OR DIKES AND PIPES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM EXITING THE SITE VIA THE ACCESS ROADS. SITE -ACCESS ROADS/DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE SURFACED WITH CRUSHED ROCK WHERE THEY ADJOIN EXISTING PAVED ROADWAYS. 7. SOILS TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY MOTOR VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEANED DAILY FROM PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES, OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF REQUESTED BY CITY OR LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 8. DUST CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE PERFORMED PERIODICALLY WHEN CONDITIONS REQUIRE AND/OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY OR LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. 9. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE USED AND MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF SITE CONSTRUCTION. IF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR NATURAL EVENTS DAMAGE OR INTERFERE WITH THESE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, THEY SHALL BE RESTORED TO SERVE THEIR INTENDED FUNCTION AT THE END OF EACH DAY OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW ACCESS. 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RESTORED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY AREAS WHICH HAVE BEEN FINISHED GRADED OR AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED AND FOR WHICH GRADING OR SITE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE NOT ACTIVELY UNDERWAY SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SET FORTH IN THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPHS WITHIN 14 DAYS: A. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED AND DISC -ANCHORED OR COVERED BY FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION. TEMPORARY STRAW MULCH SHALL BE DISC -ANCHORED AND APPLIED AT A UNIFORM RATE OF NOT LESS THAN TWO TONS PER ACRE AND NOT LESS THAN 80% COVERAGE. B. IF THE GRADED AREA IS ANTICIPATED TO BE RE-DISTURBED/DEVELOPED WITHIN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER CONSISTING OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) SEED MIXTURE 21-111 (OATS), OR 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT), AT A RATE OF 100 POUNDS PER ACRE. C. IF GRADED AREA WILL NOT BE DEVELOPED FOR A PERIOD GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS, PROVIDE A SEMI-PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER OF SEED MIXTURE MNDOT 22-112 AT A RATE OF 40 POUNDS PER ACRE. D. GRADING BONDS OR THE EQUIVALENT SECURITIES SHALL BE RETAINED UNTIL TURF HAS GERMINATED AND SURVIVED A 60 -DAY GROWING PERIOD. E. UNLESS SPECIFIED ELSEWHERE WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS (I.E. ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN OR LANDSCAPE PLAN), PERMANENT TURF RESTORATION SHALL CONSIST OF MN/DOT SEED MIXTURE 25-131 (COMMERCIAL TURF GRASS) AT A RATE OF 220 POUNDS PER ACRE. F. WHENEVER OTHER EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE INADEQUATE, TEMPORARY ON-SITE SEDIMENT BASINS THAT CONFORM TO THE CRITERIA FOR ON-SITE DETENTION BASINS SHALL BE PROVIDED. 11. RUNOFF SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS PROVIDING THEY ARE NOT NEEDED DURING CONSTRUCTION. WHERE STORM SEWER CATCH BASINS ARE NECESSARY FOR SITE DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, A SILT FENCE OR SEDIMENT PROTECTION DEVICES AS DETAILED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND ALL CATCH BASINS UNTIL THE TRIBUTARY AREA TO THE CATCH BASIN IS RESTORED. 12. GRADING ACTIVITIES PROPOSED TO BEGIN AFTER OCTOBER 15 WILL REQUIRE AN APPROVED PHASING SCHEDULE. THE AREA OF LAND THAT THE CITY WILL ALLOW TO BE DISTURBED AT THIS TIME OF YEAR WILL BE SEVERELY LIMITED. THE CITY WILL ALSO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVISES, I.E., TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS, DORMANT SEEDING AND HIGH RATES OF APPLICATION OF BOTH SEED AND MULCH. 13. FILTER BLANKET AND RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDES OF ALL STORM SEWER OUTLETS 24 HOURS AFTER CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED AND DETAILED. ALL RIPRAP SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A FILTER MATERIAL MEETING THE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR RIPRAP AND FILTER MATERIAL. 14. EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF ALL LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO THE AREA TO BE GRADED UNTIL THE AREA TRIBUTARY TO THE LAKE, POND OR WETLAND IS RESTORED. 15. TO MINIMIZE EROSION, ALL 3:1 SLOPES SHALL BE COVERED WITH A MN/DOT 3885 CATEGORY 2 STRAW EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS OR STAKED SOD. 16. ACCUMULATION OF ALL SEDIMENT OCCURRING IN STORM SEWERS, DITCHES, LAKES, PONDS AND WETLANDS SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO, DURING AND AFTER COMPLETION OF GRADING ACTIVITIES. 17. EROSION CONTROL ITEMS AND DEVICES SHALL BE REMOVED ONLY AFTER THE AREA HAS RECEIVED FINAL STABILIZATION OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY AND LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION. Page 104 BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com • 2014 BKBM Professional Engineers. Inc. • All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Professional Engineers, Inc. and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION: 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UND LAWS OF THE STiLE‘Cps,"AOTA. 0\‘4‘" ?SIGNATURE TH IESARE `O 2703 1 Ig` s PRINT + (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 E IN • TA HE GHTS Mendota Heights, MN Project Designer: KAB Drawn By: KAB Checked By: TJC Revisions 2/3/14 PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheet Number 1 Project No. 14197.00 HYD I-7 Lu � J CB TOP=874.5 SAN SAN TOP=873. 7 INV=860.0 N INV=865.6 S INV=860. 7 S DROP PIPE SAN , MA „ 1 .. 1 , r 0,_ CB/i 1 O 'ze m Il e r, 1 .j 1 r CBX O MH -�v� �s 1p ..... UGC �� aim TO•,� I IN 6 8648 E 1 1 ' FES 4 1 , r ---% - CB 1 TQG=873 4 .. 1 1 ,INV=8672 a 4 1 / INV=8638 1 1 / INV=8676 ). Fqs 5 /; 0 0 0 0 =-=J ='J R30.5' R30.5' 161 ARB TRANS 8"SPCB 8"SPCB .tic 1 8"SPCB 4"CRE B 4"CRA 3- 2 'SPCB 19"PINR 150sPc 'SPC SHB 8"MPL\ 9"ASH 5"OAK:. P 2 121 2 LP NORTHLAND DRIVE iLL 1 BITUMINOUS R25.0' R25.0' n 0 0 0 159.0 .TYP. 2 2 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE 885.30 23.0' TYP. E3 181 24.0' 'P. ❑3 LP 20.0' I 26.0' 24.0' TYP. 9.0'TYP. .46 I1I 20.0' TYP. 3 ❑3 9.0'TYP. 23.5'TYP. ❑3 1 y E cl Vo 26.0' 45 20.0' ~ TYP. I i 9.0' TYP. 10 20.0" ~ TYP. I 9.0' TYP. L_ 24.0' TYP. 20.0' ~ TYP. I 9.0' TYP. 20.0' ~ TYP. I ❑3 9.0'TYP. ❑3 23.0'TYP. 24.0' TYP. ❑3 ❑3 20.0' I TYP. 9.0' 1 6"MPL 2"SPCGI rj ^s BRICK Z WALL 3"SPCG LP 11 20.0 I TYP. 9.0'TYP. L..„...,..1,...1,..1..„....„.„...,,...1,...109.6....67. ,-rmyany7i ,J.M.,6...y.Mi '.1.1.L...67. ,...mymy.M. ,...M.i...y.M.1 , INTERSTATE H/GIHCWEAATED) Y NO. 494 PROPOSED PLAN SYMBOLS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS RETAINING WALL PROPERTY LINE SAWCUT LINE (APPROX.) HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP HANDICAP PARKING SIGN PARKING STALL COUNT MOUNTABLE CURB c *NOTE: CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN. ABBREVIATIONS BLDG BM CONC ELEV EX FFE MAX MIN R TYP. MNMUTCD Building Bench Mark Concrete Elevation Existing Finished Floor Elevation Maximum Minimum Radius Typical Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices 40' 20' 0 40' 80' SCALE 1"=40' GENERAL NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL CURB AND GUTTER IS TO BE B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. NO SIDEWALK IS TO HAVE MORE THAN A 2% CROSS SLOPE OR MORE THAN A 5% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE. 4. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR PROPOSED BUILDING LAYOUT. 5. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND DAKOTA COUNTY RULES, REGULATIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEN WORKING IN PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY. 6. NO PONDING OF WATER OR ABRUPT TRANSITIONS WILL BE ALLOWED WHERE NEW PAVEMENT/CURB/SIDEWALK MATCHES INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT/CURB/SIDEWALK. 7. ALL PARKING STALLS, EXCEPT HANDICAP STALLS, ARE TO BE 9 FEET WIDE BY 20 FEET LONG. 8. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO CONTACT THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS FIRE MARSHALL FOR THE EXACT PLACEMENT OF FIRE LANES, YELLOW -PAINTED CURBING AND NO PARKING AREAS FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES. 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT W/ FULL DEPTH JOINT FILLER. 60' 0.C. 1/8" RAD (TYP.) C3 NOTE: JOINT SPACING SHALL BE 5 -FEET ON CENTER. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR SPECIAL JOINTING PATTERNS. 3/8" WIDE x 1 3/8" DEEP TOOLED JOINT CONCRETE SHALL BE REINFORCED BY SYNTHETIC MICRO FIBER REINFORCING PER SPECIFICATIONS. (PER ASTM 01116, TYPE Ill). 4" CONCRETE WALK PER SPECIFICATIONS. (PER MN/DOT SPEC 2521.2 AND MN/DOT 2461 CONCRETE MIX 3A32). 6" GRANULAR BASE REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS. (PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3138, GRADATION CLASS 5 OR CLASS 7, 100 PERCENT CRUSHED, AND COMPACTED TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY). COMPACTED SUBGRADE, REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS. (SCARIFY 1 -FOOT AND RE -COMPACT TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY). CONCRETE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION (TYP.) NOT TO SCALE 3/8" STEEL PLATE AT TOP, SLOPE DOWN, WELD ALL SIDES METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE STATUTE 169.346 WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER ON BLUE BACKGROUND, FULLY REFLECTORIZED ATTACH 6" X12" "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN TO POST IF APPLICABLE ,7- 6" ■ 1 5'-0" 2"OAK GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN 1"=40' 2'-6" 14" CONCRETE PLACEMENT 16 GA. 4 -INCH OD GALVANIZED STEEL SIGN POST WHERE CONCRETE OCCURS AT BASE 1-1/2" EXPANSION MATERIAL AND URETHANE CAULK. 10:1 SLOPE CONCRETE SURFACE 4" LONG STUDS WELD AT QUARTER POINTS 8" ON CENTER CONCRETE BASE USE \ 12" MIN. PARKING VEHICLE ID REQUIRED UP TO $200 FINE FOR VIOLATION �J VAN ACCESSIBLE 6" 1 KEYED NOTES KEYED NOTES ARE DENOTED BY NO ON PLAN. 1a 11 INSTALL B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. REFER TO DETAIL 2/C3. INSTALL HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 3/C3. INSTALL LIGHT-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 4/C3. INSTALL CONCRETE PAVEMENT. REFER TO DETAIL 5/C3. INSTALL CONCRETE WALK. REFER TO DETAIL 6/C3. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR CONCRETE FINISH AND JOINTING. INSTALL CONCRETE DRIVE ENTRANCE. REFER TO DETAIL 5/C5 INSTALL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. REFER TO DETAIL 4/C5. REFER TO MN/DOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 AND MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE 7038. INSTALL HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN. REFER TO DETAIL 7/C3. REPLACE PAVEMENT REMOVED FOR UTILITY AND DRIVE ENTRANCE INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT CROSS SECTION. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL STOP SIGN PER MNMUTCD. INSTALL SURMOUNTABLE CURB PER DETAIL 7/C5. PAVING NOTES: 1. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR STOOP DETAILS. ALL WALKS ARE TO BE CENTERED ON THE DOORS. 2. INSTALL APPROPRIATE EXPANSION MATERIAL WHERE CONCRETE IS ADJACENT TO BUILDING FACE. 3. SAWCUT AND MATCH NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT INTO EXISTING PAVEMENT. NO ABRUPT GRADE TRANSITIONS OR PONDING OF WATER WILL BE ALLOWED. 4. MATCH NEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INTO EXISTING. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CURB TYPE, MATERIAL AND INSTALLATION METHODS. 5. SAWCUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CURB AND GUTTER TO NEAREST JOINT. COORDINATE REMOVAL LIMITS WITH SITE DEMOLITION CONTRACTOR AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. INSTALL DRIVE ENTRANCE PER CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS. FOLLOW ALL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND DAKOTA COUNTY REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL. 3/8" STEEL PLATE AT TOP, SLOPE DOWN, WELD ALL SIDES SLOPE 3/4" PER FOOT TO FINISHED GRADE EXTEND AGGREGATE BASE A MINIMUM OF 12" FROM EDGE OF GUTTER OR MATCH INTO AGGREGATE BASE OF APPROPRIATE PAVEMENT SECTION o 1/2" R 0 0 0� 0 a 0 ° 0 0 0�0 00 0 o ALL PLAN DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB - (6" TO BACK OF CURB) 3" R 3" R BACK OF CURB 6" j- 1/2" R a 1:1 SLOPE 0 0 0' 0 "a ° .. O o O o o Q C1-75-',, 6` 000 0000 o p0 0'0°00; 00 000 )(D 00000 0° 00 o 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oo 12" MIN. 12" 12" MIN. NOTES: 2" MIN. DEPTH AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY 1. DIRECTION OF TRANSVERSE GUTTER SLOPE TO MATCH DIRECTION OF ADJACENT PAVEMENT SLOPE. 2. CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2531. B612 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE STATUTE 169.346 WHITE LEGEND AND BORDER ON BLUE BACKGROUND, FULLY REFLECTORIZED ATTACH 6" X12' "VAN ACCESSIBLE" 7 - SIGN TO POST IF APPLICABLE 14" PERVIOUS PLACEMENT HANDICAPPED SIGN AND POST C3 NOT TO SCALE 16 GA. 2i -INCH OD GALVANIZED STEEL SIGN POST WHERE CONCRETE OCCURS AT BASE USE 1-1/2" EXPANSION MATERIAL AND URETHANE CAULK. 10:1 SLOPE GRASS SURFACE 4" LONG STUDS WELD AT QUARTER POINTS 8" ON CENTER CONCRETE BASE C3 NOT TO SCALE WEARING COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 MVWE4 (NO RECYCLED BIT. ALLOWED) NON -WEARING COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 MVNW3 TACK COAT PER MN/DOT 2357 (IF REQUIRED) CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (100% CRUSHED), PER MN/DOT 3138 COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. \/ /////`s //»%l_c0 -III 1I1 1 1 1I1 111 111 111 111 1 1 1 --HI -1 I III III. -III - 11 1 11 1 IIII SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT SUBGRADE TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY -PROOF ROLL PER MN/DOT 2111 t--- 2" '- 2" - 8" MIN. -12" MIN. HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NOT TO SCALE WEARING COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 MVWE4 NON -WEARING COURSE PER MN/DOT 2360 MVNW3 TACK COAT PER MN/DOT 2357 (IF REQUIRED) CLASS 5 AGGREGATE (100% CRUSHED), PER MN/DOT 3138 COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. »>>>>>» >>'>»»»»»» pOo 00e .0e e r Ili -ill -r1 -111-111-1'n=‘ 711=1 1=111=111=111=1 11 ;11111111111111 SCARIFY AND RECOMPACT SUBGRADE TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY -PROOF ROLL PER MN/DOT 2111 t 1-1/2" + 1-1/2" 6" MIN. 12" MIN. LIGHT-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT C3 NOT TO SCALE BROOM FINISH CONCRETE PAVING WITH CONTROL JOINTS AT 10' MAXIMUM SPACING NOTE: JOINT SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 24 TO 30 TIMES THE PAVEMENT THICKNESS WITH A MAXIMUM OF 15 FEET. CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SHALL BE REINFORCED BY SYNTHETIC MICRO AND MACRO FIBER REINFORCING PER SPECIFICATIONS. 8" CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER SPECIFICATIONS. 5" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (100% CRUSHED) PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3138, COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. COMPACTED SUBGRADE. C3 NOT TO SCALE Page 106 BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com • 2014 BKBM Professional Engineers. Inc. • All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Professional Engineers, Inc. and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UND LAWS OF THE S;ALTE` Cps, E OTA. 6V\‘4‘ ?SIGNATURE O� TI -11y43 ESARE r \ON PRINT + ` 27031 S�� LIC Con (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 E IN • TA HE GHTS Mendota Heights, MN Project Designer: KAB Drawn By: KAB Checked By: TJC Revisions 2/3/14 PRELIMINARY GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN Sheet Number Project No. 14197.00 } COMPACTED BACKFILL SPRINGLINE PIPE EMBEDMENT BEDDING MIN 4" A 1 \ UUOvUv�jvUv�jvUvUvUvUvUv\� �0 ocO0`00 POO 0`00 POO 0`00 POO 0`00 oO 0 00 0� OonO�,oOoOo(�OoOo(�OoOo(�OonO�,oA•\ / DO0 0`i�' 0000 O 0 0`00 O 0 0`00 O 0 0`00 0`C' ••.r/§, r/ Mkr rX / \/X:\ MIN 12" } HAUNCH PIPE BEDDING FOUNDATION (AS NEEDED) NOTES: 1. THE MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH "W" SHALL BE W=Do+16" OR 1.25*Do+12 WHICHEVER IS GREATER. 2. PIPE EMBEDMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE CLASS I OR CLASS II MATERIAL. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR DETAILS. 3. REFER TO ASTM D2321-05 "UNDERGROUND INSTALLATION OF THERMOPLASTIC PIPE FOR SEWERS AND OTHER GRAVITY -FLOW APPLICATIONS" FOR DETAILS. 8 DIA. OF PIPE TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING FOR PVC AND HDPE NOT TO SCALE B y DIA. OF PIPE PLAN 2'-0" RIP -RAP SEE NOTE 1 0 GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET SEE NOTES 2 AND 3 GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET SEE NOTES 2 AND 3 /•i\\ \\ \\/ /\\\/� SECTION A -A RIP -RAP SEE NOTE 1 At 441iirmse No00.0400.-/- RIPRAP REQUIREMENTS DIA. OF ROUND PIPE (IN.) w (FT.) L (FT.) 12" DEPTH CLASS II RIPRAP (CU. YDS.) 18" DEPTH CLASS III RIPRAP (CU. YDS.) 12 6.0 8 2.8 4.1 15 6.5 8 2.9 4.4 18 7.0 10 3.9 5.9 21 7.5 10 4.2 6.3 24 8.0 12 5.5 8.3 27 8.5 12 5.8 8.7 30 9.0 14 7.3 10.9 36 10.0 16 9.2 13.8 42 10.5 18 10.9 16.3 48 11.0 20 12.9 19.4 SECTION B -B NOTE: 1. FOR PIPES GREATER THAN 30" USE 1'-6". 2. THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS OPTION, MAY SUBSTITUTE A GEOTEXTILE FABRIC BLANKET, Mn/DOT SPEC. 3601, FOR THE GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 3. VOLUMES OF GRANULAR FILTER SHALL BE 1/2 THE VOLUME OF OF RIP -RAP AT ANY GIVEN PIPE DIAMETER. RIP -RAP SHALL BE PLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH Mn/DOT SPEC. 2511. 4. RIP -RAP AT FLARED ENDS C4 NOT TO SCALE COMPACTED BACKFILL SAND OR PIT RUN GRANULAR MATERIAL I�� IIL� O.D.+2 O.D. O.D./2 O.D./4 (4" MIN) GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING METHOD f City of Mendota Alit Ali Heights TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING PLATE # 101 10 TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING FOR DIP Cj NOT TO SCALE USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS. "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL SEAL WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL 16" BARREL SECTION 58"" CATCH BASIN CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH R3067V OR APPROVED EQUAL. VARIABLE FLOW ( • ;' "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL CATCH BASIN WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL ADJUSTING RINGS: MIN. OF 2 ROWS AND MAX. OF 6 ROWS WITH MORTAR. CLASS II PRECAST PIPE MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 3000L (NOT TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF MANHOLE) VARIABLE FLOW 3'-0" USE 72" MANHOLE IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN HOLES IS LESS THAN 1/2 OF SMALLEST PIPE OUTER DIAMETER. ""MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 4020G """MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO.4011 E CONTRACTOR/DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING ENVIRONMENTAL MH'S PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. rn City of Mendota 11,1 Li Heights ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL MANHOLE FOR STORM SEWER PLATE # 401 NOTE: REFER TO STORM SEWER TABLE FOR RIM AND INVERT INFORMATION �C4 6 SUMP MANHOLE CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE STANDARD MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER MCI 301-A ADJUSTING RINGS - MIN. OF 2 ROWS AND MAX. OF 6 ROWS WITH MORTAR "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL MANHOLE SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE BARREL SHALL BE WITH NON - SHRINKING CEMENT MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE NEENAH R -1981-L AND SPACED 16" O.C. OR APPROVED EQUAL AND SHALL CONFORM TO OSHA REQUIREMENTS ASTM C-478 CLASS II CIRCULAR REINF. LATEST REVISION USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS WITH "0" RING RUBBER GASKETS "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL SEAL WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL NON -SHRINKING CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 3 -WATER STOPS f. NOTE: NO MANHOLE SHALL BE ORDERED UNTIL PIPE OPENING LOCATION IS DETERMINED IN FIELD. 27" DIA. 4'-0" 1'-4" 48" DIA. 12" CONNECT TO EXIST. SAN. M.H. BY CORE DRILLING, USE KOH -N -SEAL BOOT. GROUT INVERT TO PROVIDE PROPER FLOW LINE. STEPS - 16"O.C. SEE DETAIL ABOVE` L 8" (TYP.) 8" VARIABLE 20" MAX. .-•..f' - -• • •.-.-4 .r T 12" O.C. EA. WAY VARIABLE VARIABLE 6" MIN. "CRE - SEAL", "RES - SEAL" OR APPROVED EQUAL PRE -CAST GASKETED CONNECTION SHALL BE USED FOR CONNECTING PIPE TO MANHOLE. m Mendota City of .t Ali Heights STANDARD MANHOLE FOR SANITARY SEWER PLATE # S-1 NOTE: REFER TO STORM SEWER TABLE FOR RIM AND INVERT INFORMATION SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE C4 NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BITUMINOUS MINIMUM TWO (2) FOOT HIGH ROCK BERM CONSISTING OF 1 INCH TO 2 INCH DIAMETER WASHED ROCK 4:1 SLOPE __ __ __ __ 4.1 SLOPE ��•••••••i„.�� 3 16' 12 INCH MINIMUM OF 1 INCH TO 2 INCH DIAMETER WASHED ROCK 50' MINIMUM GEOTEXTILE FABRIC NOTE: 1. MINIMUM LENGTH OF 50 FEET AND WIDTH OF 12 FEET. 2. FOLLOW ALL CITY, WATERSHED DISTRICT AND MPCA STANDARDS. 3. CLEAN STREETS ON A DAILY BASIS OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF REQUESTED BY CITY, WATERSHED DISTRICT OR MPCA. BERMED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C4 NOT TO SCALE HINGED CONNECTIONS NOTES: 1. BARS & PLATES ARE HOT -ROLLED STEEL 2. BARS, PLATES & PIPE ARE FINISHED WITH TWO COATS OF ALUMINUM PAINT. 3. BOLTS ARE GALVANIZED 4. PROVIDE GAP (H) AT BOTTOM OF TRASH GUARD TO ALLOW DEBRIS TO PASS THROUGH GAP SHALL BE: SIZE OF PIPE H 12" TO 18" 4" 21"TO42" 6" 48" TO 72" 12" ALL GUARDS TO HAVE (1) CROSS BAR, 60" AND UP TO HAVE (2) BARS EQUALLY SPACED HOT DIP GALVANIZED PER Mn/DOT 3392 OR ASTM -A153 BAR SIZES STANDARD DESIGN HEAVY DESIGN ARCH ROUND PIPE SIZE HOLE DIA. REQ'D BOLT DIA. BAR SIZE ARCH ROUND PIPE SIZE HOLE DIA. REQ'D BOLT DIA. BAR SIZE 12" - 24" 3/4" 5/8" 5/8" 12" - 18" 3/4" 5/8" 3/4" 27" - 48" 7/8" 3/4" 3/4" 21' - 48" 7/8" 3/4" 1" 54"-90" 11/8" 1" 1" 54"-90" 11/8" 1" 11/4" 22" - 29" 3/4 5/8" 5/8" 22" 3/4" 5/8" 3/4" 36" - 59" 7/8 3/4" 3/4" 29" - 59" 7/8" 3/4" 1" 65" - 88" 1 1/8" 1" 1" 65" - 88" 1 1/8" 1" 1 1/4" BOLT LG = PIPE WALL THK. + 2 1/2" City of Mendota TRASH GUARDS FOR CONCRETE APRONS PLATE # SW -13 FLARED END SECTION WITH TRASH GUARD C4 NOT TO SCALE CATCH BASIN CASTING NEENAH R -3067V OR APPROVED EQUAL RAISE BACK TO MAX. HEIGH MINIMUM OF 2 ADJUSTMENT RINGS "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL 3 1/2" 5" r f 1 r c 1 u. c 1 z C 18" 46" 3 1/2" CATCH BASIN WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL SEAL WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL >. PLAN 31" 24" L _ r 1 5" i NOTE: REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF #4 BARS AT 8" O/C BOTH WAYS oEE PLATE #403 FOR - }. 1 NOTES ON CONCRETE ENCASEMENT. SEE NOTE VARIABLE SECTION A - A rn City of Mendota 1,1 Heights STANDARD CATCH BASIN FOR STORM SEWER PLATE # 402 NOTE: REFER TO STORM SEWER TABLE FOR RIM AND INVERT INFORMATION 5 24" x 36" PRECAST CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE 1" REBAR FOR BAG REMOVAL FROM INLET (REBAR NOT INCLUDED) OPTIONAL OVERFLOW SILTSACK - DUMP LOOPS (REBAR NOT INCLUDED) 3" DIA. STEEL POST OR 2" X 2" WOOD POST 4' MAX SPACING TRENCH 6" X 6" FILTER FABRIC FLOW LAY FABRIC IN TRENCH 1 30" MN SET POSTS AND EXCAVATE A 6" X 6" TRENCH UPSLOPE ALONG THE LINE OF THE POSTS 1111=11111= 3 N11111 ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC TO THE WIRE FENCING AND THE TRENCH. BACKFILL THE TRENCH. 11111%1111=IIIIImIIIII= 11111-11111 11111=1111 1111I 11 III IIIII IIIII BOTTOM OF DRAINAGE WAY 0 J LL WIRE FENCING FLOW FLOW 2 STAPLE THE WIRE MESH TO EACH POST to IN J E11111E11111= E 11111=11111 11111=11111 EIIIII ERN MIIIIII COMPACTED BACKFILL BACKFILL THE TRENCH AND COMPACT THE EXCAVATED SOIL 11111=11111`x= =11111-11111- ILJ II IIIII 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO END OF EXPECTED USEABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL NECESSARY. tHE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. B ELEVATION POINTS "A" SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN POINTS "B" 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER REQUIRED, SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. City of Mendota la a" Heights SILT FENCE REQUIREMENTS PLATE # 602 POLYESTER SLEEVE 1 FILTER ASSEMBLY C4 SILTATION FENCE NOT TO SCALE MANHOLE COVER ASSEMBLY CURB POLYESTER SLEEVE OPENING FOR LARGE RAINFALL EVENTS BARRIER FRAME CATCH BASIN STRUCTURE CURB OPENING FOAM EXPANSION RESTRAINT DI -23 FILTER ASSEMBLY 11=11=11 =1 =11=11=11=1 11=11:11 :1 :11:11:11:1 11=11=11=11=11=11=11=1 11E11E11=11=1=11E11=1 INFRASAFE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER (27" OR 2'X3') PERFORATED WALL Mn/DOT 3149.2H COARSE ROCK /\\ oo:o o o°{ FILTER FABRIC INSTALLATION DETAIL SIDE VIEW INSTALLED 4' WOOD OR METAL STAKE CATCH BASIN 4" - 24" NOTES: 1. MAXIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN POSTS IS 4'. AN EXTRA POST MAY BE ADDED ON EACH SIDE. 2. MAINTAIN UNTIL SURFACE HAS BEEN PAVED AND/OR VEGETATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 3. GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE INSTALLED PER SILT FENCE DETAIL. INLETS SEDIMENTATION PROTECTION OPTIONS NOT TO SCALE Page 107 BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com • 2014 BKBM Professional Engineers. Inc. • All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Professional Engineers, Inc. and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM:j DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UND LAWS OF THE STiLEXCps,"AOTA. 0\‘4‘" ?SIGNATURE TH �ESARE `O� C O� PRINT + ` 27031 S�� LIC CRE (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 E IN ITA HE GHTS ce Q Mendota Heights, MN Project Designer: KAB Drawn By: KAB Checked By: TJC Revisions 2/3/14 PRELIMINARY CIVIL DETAILS Sheet Number Project No. 14197.00 12"R 10 /2" 6 1/2" v v. 28"R . P . D a• 68"R 9 • li • _D• D -- P T- 171/2" 28" 10 1/2" City of Mendota raj Heights MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER PLATE # 507 C5 MOUNTABLE CURB AND GUTTER NOT TO SCALE 25R 12.5' NOTE: 7" MIN. THICKNESS REQUIRED ON ENTIRE APRON. 30' TO 36'* 24' MAX** 10' MAX. A A -A RA ). 0-6 CURB I EXPANSION JOINT A TYPICAL ENTRANCE FOR MULTI -FAMILY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL* PROPERTIES AND RESIDENTAL** AREAS WITH SIDEWALK. 1. WHERE NEW DRIVEWAYS ARE TO BE ADDED ACROSS EXISTING C&G, REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER AND REPOUR INTEGRAL WITH THE CONCRETE ENTRANCE. 2. CONCRETE APRON SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL ENTRANCES AND APARTMENTS OF MORE THAN 4 UNITS. 3. CONCRETE APRON SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR RESIDENTAL ENTRANCES ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK. 4. REQUIRED MIX DESIGNATION IS 3A32. m City of Mendota Heights COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CONCRETE ENTRANCES PLATE # 508 TYPICAL CONCRETE ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE STANDARD MANHOLE • SHALL BE MUNICIPAL CASTINGS, INC. NO. 301A WITH TWO CONCEALED PICK UP HOLES. LABELED "STORM SEWER" OR EQUAL. CATCH BASIN MANHOLE • IN STREETS - CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH NO. R3067V OR EQUAL • IN YARDS - CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R4342. STOOL TYPE OR EQUAL USE R-2 JOINT FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS. 16" BARREL SECTION "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL SEAL WRAP OR APPROVED EQUAL NON SHRINKING CONCRETE ENCASEMENT "INFI-SHIELD " EXTERNAL MANHOLE SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL TOP SLAB DETAILS MANHOLE DIAMETER H 48" 60" 8" 72" 8" ADJUSTING RINGS: MIN. OF 2 ROWS AND MAX. OF 6 ROWS WITH MORTAR. CLASS II PRECAST PIPE MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 3000L (NOT TONGUE OR GROOVE AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF MANHOLE) City of Mendota Heights STANDARD STORM SEWER MANHOLE PLATE # SW -3 NOTE: REFER TO STORM SEWER TABLE FOR RIM AND INVERT INFORMATION STORM SEWER MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE STREET SURFACE GATEBOX BASE TO REST ON CREOSOTED BLOCKS OR FIRM SOIL, NOT ON GATE VBALVE OR PIPE, COVER TOP SECTION STANDARD VALVE BOX BOTTOM SECTION BASE DETAIL BASE SUPPORT GATE VALVE RETAINER GLANDS TO BE USED AS DIRECTED BY ST, PAUL WATER UTILITY RETAINER GLAND DUCTILE IR❑N PIPE MECHANICAL JOINT FITTING Fri City of Mendota la Ai 1,1 Heights TYPICAL GATE VALVE AND BOX INSTALLATION WM-3 C5 TYPICAL GATE VALVE AND BOX NOT TO SCALE VARIABLE WIDTH O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 ©AOA© 01-00 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O RECTANGULAR PLATES 50% — 65% OF BASE DIAMETER 0.9" TO 1.4" f SECTION A—A TRUNCATED DOME NOTES: 0.2" VARIABLE LONG CHORD WIDTH RADIUS D z N OF TRAVEL z O F U w ce0 • 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 OO • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o OO 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ©O4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oo 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 00 0 0 000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 Qo OO 0 0 0 0 00 00 OO 0o 00 00000000000 000000000000 DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL FOLLOW THE PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES (PROWAG). DETECTABLE WARNINGS CONSIST OF TRUNCATED DOMES ALIGNED IN A SQUARE OR RADIAL GRID PATTERN. DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE REQUIRED: — WHERE RAMPS, LANDINGS, OR BLENDED TRANSITIONS PROVIDE A FLUSH PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE ROADWAY. — WHERE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTES CROSS COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS THAT ARE PROVIDED WITH TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES OR OTHERWISE PERMITTED TO OPERATE LIKE A PUBLIC ROADWAY. — AT PEDESTRIAN RAILWAY CROSSINGS. — ON RAIL PLATFORMS WHERE BOARDING EDGES ARE NOT PROTECTED. DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL EXTEND: — A MINIMUM OF 24" IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. — THE FULL WIDTH OF THE RAMP, LANDING, OR BLENDED TRANSITION, WITHIN 3" OF FULL WIDTH ON EITHER END. — THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PUBLIC USE AREA OF A RAIL PLATFORM. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH ADJACENT GUTTER, ROADWAY, OR WALKWAY, EITHER A LIGHT—ON—DARK OR DARK—ON—LIGHT. CONTRAST MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE FULL RAMP SURFACE, EXCLUDING THE FLARED SIDES. VARIABLE SHORT CHORD WIDTH RADIAL PLATES O TYPICAL RADIAL TRUNCATED DOME PLATES RADIUS (FEET) LONG CHORD WIDTH (INCHES) SQ. FT. PER PLATE PLATES REQUIRED FOR 90 DEGREE TURN 10 23-1/2 3.53 8 15 18-13/16 2.93 15 15 23-1/2 3.67 12 20 18-13/16 3.00 20 20 18-7/8 2.98 20 25 20-1/2 3.28 23 25 23-9/16 3.77 20 30 22-5/8 3.65 25 35 22 3.56 30 FOR MN/DOT PROJECTS, SEE MN/DOT'S APPROVED/QUALIFIED PRODUCT LISTS. DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE SHALL BE PAID FOR AS TRUNCATED DOMES BY THE SQUARE FOOT. ALL TRUNCATED DOME SYSTEMS SHALL BE PLACED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MANUFACTURER. CENTER TO CENTER DOME SPACING: 1.6" MINIMUM, 2.4" MAXIMUM. BASE TO BASE DOME SPACING: 0.65" MINIMUM. DOME BASE TO PLATE EDGE SPACING: 0.35" MINIMUM, 0.75" MAXIMUM. SPACING VARIES ON RADIAL PLATES. TYPICAL WIDTHS AVAILABLE: 12", 18", 24", 30", 36". CHECK WITH MANUFACTURERS FOR AVAILABLE WIDTHS. ON RADIAL PLATE, RADIUS DEFINED AT BACK OF CURB. TYPICAL RADII. CHECK WITH MANUFACTURERS FOR AVAILABLE RADII. STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE TRUNCATED DOMES SPECIFICATION REFERENCE 2531 STANDARD PLATE N0. 7038A NOTE: FOR ADA COMPLIANT PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, REFER TO MN/DOT STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS AT THE FOLLOWING WEB ADDRESS: HTTP://STAN DARDPLATES. DOT.STATE. M N. US/STDPLATE.ASPX CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE FINAL CURB RAMP LOCATION AND PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAIL WITH THE CITY AND OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 4 PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP — DETECTABLE WARNING C5 NOT TO SCALE f I PLAN -22 1/2° BEND CONCRETE SHALL BE IN CONTACT WITH THIS PLAN- 9O° BEND QUADRANT OF PIPE, AT LEAST BEDDING MATERIAL APPROX.. 1:1 SLOPE WHERE DEPTH BELOW PIPE EXCEEDS 6" - SECTION A -A BUTTRESS DIMENSIONS PIPE SIZE 22 1/2" BENDS 45° BENDS 90' BENDS B1 D1 B2 D2 B3 D3 12" 1'-10" 1'-10" 5-4" 16" 20" 3'_6" 2'-8" 5-6" 24" 4'-4" 3'-0" 6'-10" 3'-10" 9'-8" PLAN -45° BEND 1. DIMENSIONS IN TABLE ARE BASED ON A WATER PRESURE OF 150 P.S.I. AND AN EARTH RESISTANCE OF 1 TON PER SQ. FT. 2. WOOD BLOCKING MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF CONCRETE FOR 6" & 8"0 45° BENDS AND FOR 6", 8", 12"0 22 1/2' BENDS PROVIDED AREA IN CONTACT WITH EARTH IS SAME AS AREA SHOWN. 3. DIMENSION C1,C2,C3 SHOULD BE LARGE ENOUGH TO MAKE ANGLE EQUAL TO OR LARGER THAN 45°. 4. DIMENSION Al A2, A3 SHOULD BE AS LARGE AS POSSIBLE WITHOUT INTERFERING WITH M.J. BOLTS. 5. SHAPE OF BACK OF BUTTRESS MAY VARY AS LONG AS POUR IS AGAINST FIRM UNDISTURBED EARTH. r City of Mendota Ai Ai Ali Heights CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING PLATE # 301 1 THRUST BLOCK DETAIL FOR MECHANICAL PIPE BENDS C5 NOT TO SCALE COVER GROUND LINE CURB SECTION z O MAIN AND TEE it GATE BOX ASSEMBLY 4'-0" OPERATING NUT BONNET HOSE NOZZLE 16" MIN NOZZLE SECTION TRAFIC FLANGE III 111111 IIIII 11111 1 — 1111— 11111=11111 11111 ��, TOP SECTION BACK FILL AND TAMP BOTTOM SECTION GRAVEL OR CRUSHED ROCK BASE IIIII=IIIII —IIIII STANDPIPE DRIP BOX 0 0 7-; - '6- ap • o- p: e" 5- �: BOTTOM 2'-0" 6" GATE VALVE MIN. RETAINER GLANDS TO BE USED USE RETAINER GLANDS CEMENT BLOCK City of Mendota AAA Heights FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLATION 8'-6" BURY WM-4 TYPICAL HYDRANT WITH GATE VALVE AND BOX c5} NOT TO SCALE Page 108 BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 www.bkbm.com • 2014 BKBM Professional Engineers. Inc. • All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Professional Engineers, Inc. and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ENGINEER UND LAWS OF THE STCE` Cps, "AOTA. ?SIGNATURE O� TH ESARE `O\ PRINT 27031 LIC"D LE (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 E IN • TA HE GHTS ce Q Mendota Heights, MN Project Designer: KAB Drawn By: KAB Checked By: TJC Revisions 2/3/14 PRELIMINARY CIVIL DETAILS Sheet Number Project No. 14197.00 671.7 II"SPCG 871 9.9 1/) D 0 1- N c0 ro D H - N CO m TC 873.7 m 87 873F7•4 • 4RB 874.1 es / NOATHLAN 2/'RCP ST \ DRIVE \ 874.3 875.3 / 876.1 /877.0 OGC TC / TC 87 TC7.9 878.8 88D.0 86QA ' TC TC F� 881.4 862. TOP=882.5 INV -877./ E /NV=876.9 W y/Vme7,i? B I T U M i N 0 U S TOP=88y.9 Kivu i/. INV -880. S OPEN 'ROA /NV=879.5 /8'RSTS /NV=879.6 E 882.2 _gen- 883.3 J ` 83.9 1 % % - 1 % • •� 1 TC/ TC Tr/ 73 AR SM TOP= INV=86 2.9 /0 • 87 9 8"MPL 3.1 RB /0.8 2-1 "COT 87 .7 6.2 6'COT 876.1 8"COT 875.9 15"COT TO INV= INV=8 INV=867 INV=864.2 SMH / TOP=874.6 /NV=864.5 W /NV=864.4 N 875.3 675.5 3.8 6"PINR 875.3 874. 1 INR 2-6"ELM 875.6 875.3 / 875.0 / B"ELM 874.5 "CRAB' 876.4 74.7 "CRAB • 874. 8745 1 873.8 • 8"SPCB \ 3.2 C >PCB itl 873.7 8"SPCB 3.5 'CB 872.8 TC 0 0, 0 0 72.7 TC 0 CO m TC of 673.0 I-0 875.4 6"MPL 878.1 4"C AB 4.4 CB 9 .3 B 676.0 876.7 2 878.0 1877.811((( /-_..,78, �� :: I 1 C/( 8 877.9' ` 11 / / 188"/ 65. -'b / \ 876.6 I \111\\\�`///•: 875. I 876.0\ `\ -� / •" I \ \ 9.3 ,7 / 878.2 / 876.3 / 1 I I r / / 879.2 79.9 879.4 860.0 / / 1380.5 882.4 .2 9 CO 881. 3.16"C'T 880 881.0 / _880.9 / /I 8 77 I 1876.0 / / / 876.5/ 176.8 I / 1 877.2 • 877.2 5-9"E SPIE .3� 818.7 IR 1 / NR1r 745 / 11R / f 678.0 / 879. S�I 61 / IH / 1 877 878.9 / / 878.8 / 879.4 880.4 880.5 /181.0 8 4 1 ----- __ - 5" 879.6 883.4 8807 879.3 879.9 / / /�\-� G /�'� g//� / 8.8 860.1 // ,R68\ 887.5 o X66.00 886. 8� //// 887.40 \ 887.40 J/ /// 8 9.5 8 \ / B0 11 888.5 \ / 88213 81.9 STOCKPILE 88A.8 8 5 882.5 / 82.9 1 88215 C88p.5 0077 / 866 .1111\(\0.02 v / 688.0 887 880.8 I I1 I ,�� / 687.7 887.3 1 689.2 7'I // ' / 681:\i\\ 886.7 /' / I / 881.5\ s ` \ \ 85.6 686.5 868.\88✓3. / /880.9 880.9 881.3 881.9 678 6 SHB 880.7 88•.3 UGG UGG/ FWD //2' OPEN IRON 88(7 1.7 882.6 / (683.0 882.2 \ \ Jij \87.8 I, 4.9 885.6\./k. .6886.1 /k. \ \86 2 2 681.4/ / 1 82883.0 .8 882.1 862.7 883.6 883.2 884.0 883.7 / SE9 883.1 884.7 88 884. 86.0 884. 3 84.7 I COT .6 884 A 846 889.7 884. \86 .4 \\\ 88.4 \\\ 8 \DA2TIME OF CCCENTRATION c)=1244 MIN 884.4 • 884.0 885. I 863 /7 884 3.9 884.7 885.6 .9 882. � 882.8 882.5 2-9" 0T I I "COT 2-7 COT II"COT 881.8 / /SKIMMER TOP=887.4 INV -882.0 SE / /NV=884.4 S /NV=88/. 4 885.4/ / 886.1 K 884. /// 887.3 / / Q3 �ss.a c`O 00 /fib p 89A.f 8%4.6 / 667./2 cg3 pp / 111 /�i� \ 884 2 7 Oso . :...• V- 906- -99 ' ".. /� 905.7 1 - 905.5 9` 905. 111 91r', •04.9 5. IL903.5 03.r 9i96.8 \896.2 8 8 -\\\ L9-00.8 ----92..2.„9_,(// 696.2 896 -See -n 1 CI 1� / �c -----/ //,'0 900.8 OY3 / \�9 / 896.3 ��I 8 0. // i" 892.9 ��- 6 2. ' 00. 899. / 895.4 ) . 0.6 y 896.2 1 I 1691.7 891.4 r/, ••.. 884.5 884.6 884.5 84.9 885.3 \ 886.6 887.\ ggg2 8692 \ \ 1 886.4 \ \ 886.4 81x6.8 1 \ 888 3 886.2 886.7 I 1 885.0 685.0 865.6 886.5 4 FT CHAIN LINK FENCE (PUBLICLY DEDICA TED) INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 494 886.4 / / 887.0 887.5 FND //2' REBAR 887.3 8887 A IA / /1/1 C) /1A// A /V// V Li l/ / / 1 / YY / ,�- L_r1 / A//n / v L.J. //gni. n/n r,',1?')1;' ) fp 88 8)7.7 ) 889.0 / 889.7 /- • 887.4 'T 687.4 / 888.8 / I / 888.0 / 889.2 888.5 Ed 888.5` 1888.7 ✓ 88.9 889.2 88 889.6 189 89, MI s 8 0 89 3" N N 8£ ro ro 8 FND IRON MON R.L.S. 86/2 891.5 EXISTING CONDITIONS C6 1"=50' EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS DRAINAGE AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) TOTAL AREA (ACRES) Q OUT (CFS) STORM EVENT 2 -YEAR (2.81") 10 -YEAR (4.19") 100 -YEAR (7.47") ROUTING 1 0.00 3.08 3.08 0.12 1.97 10.38 OFFSITE 2 0.00 5.23 5.23 0.21 3.30 17.43 OFFSITE TOTAL 0.00 8.31 8.31 0.33 5.27 27.81 NORTH POND VICINITY MAP 50' 25' 0 • 877.9 TC TC INV -877 I INV -876.9 W BITUMI OUS S OPEN IRO .04mtixelADYGIIF ',%"1110 871.7 871 9.9 rsi or - 76.70 4 63 8 =867 6 IPA tp TC 873.7 AR ARB AR 1 881.2 874. 81 9 823.8 882.5 874.1 8745 873.8 8"SPCB 878.3 SPCB 873.7 8"SPCB PCB 872.8 9 / 8.77 0 0 8%4.6 / '887. 1 I I 11 884 2 I I 87.2 / // / 011 46.3 114 mow MIMI MLA ARO 31111 CIWWI TC 873.0 )886.0 875.4 8"MPL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 57 882.2 884.0 DA 4 TIME OF ONCENTRATION (Tc)=6.4 MIN 885.4 886. 887.5 4 FT CHAIN LINK FENCE (PUBLICLY DEDICA TED) INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 494 FND //2' REBAR 891.5 FND IRON MON 50' 100' SCALE - 50' ABBREVIATIONS BLDG BMP BW CB CONC ELEV EX FFE HWL INV MAX MH MIN MPCA NPDES PVC RCP TW Building Best Management Practice Bottom of Wall Catch Basin Concrete Elevation Existing Finished Floor Elevation High Water Level Invert Maximum Manhole Minimum Minnesota Pollution Control Agency National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Polyvinyl Chloride Reinforced Concrete Pipe Top of Wall Washout PROJECT NARRATIVE THE EXISTING APPROXIMATE 8.31 ACRE SITE IS LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ENTERPRISE ROAD AND NORTHLAND DRIVE. CURRENTLY THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES ON SITE. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE DRAINS FROM SOUTHEAST TO NORTHWEST VIA OVERLAND SHEET FLOW AND SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW. NO STORMWATER TREATMENT MEASURES ARE BEING PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. THE PROPOSED SITE WILL INCLUDE A 96,000 SF BUILDING WITH A NEW PARKING AREA AND LOADING DOCKS FOR TRUCKS. STORM WATER WILL BE TREATED BY SURFACE INFILTRATION PONDS. PRETREATMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE USE OF SUMP CATCH BASINS. PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1"=50' PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS DRAINAGE AREA 2 -YR STORM (2.81") RUNOFF (CFS) 10 -YR STORM (4.19") RUNOFF (CFS) 100 -YR STORM (7.47") RUNOFF (CFS) EXISTING SITE 0.33 5.27 27.81 PROPOSED SITE 0.32 4.67 16.33 ABBREVIATIONS BLDG BMP BW CB CONC ELEV EX FFE HWL INV MAX MH MIN MPCA NPDES PVC RCP TW Building Best Management Practice Bottom of Wall Catch Basin Concrete Elevation Existing Finished Floor Elevation High Water Level Invert Maximum Manhole Minimum Minnesota Pollution Control Agency National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Polyvinyl Chloride Reinforced Concrete Pipe Top of Wall Washout PROJECT NARRATIVE THE EXISTING APPROXIMATE 8.31 ACRE SITE IS LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ENTERPRISE ROAD AND NORTHLAND DRIVE. CURRENTLY THERE ARE NO STRUCTURES ON SITE. STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE DRAINS FROM SOUTHEAST TO NORTHWEST VIA OVERLAND SHEET FLOW AND SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW. NO STORMWATER TREATMENT MEASURES ARE BEING PROVIDED AT THIS TIME. THE PROPOSED SITE WILL INCLUDE A 96,000 SF BUILDING WITH A NEW PARKING AREA AND LOADING DOCKS FOR TRUCKS. STORM WATER WILL BE TREATED BY SURFACE INFILTRATION PONDS. PRETREATMENT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE USE OF SUMP CATCH BASINS. PROPOSED CONDITIONS 1"=50' PROPOSED DRAINAGE AREAS DRAINAGE AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) PERVIOUS AREA (ACRES) TOTAL AREA (ACRES) Q OUT (CFS) STORM EVENT 2 -YEAR (2.81") 10 -YEAR (4.19") 100 -YEAR (7.47") ROUTING 1 1.92 0.51 2.43 0.03 1.50 9.10 WEST POND NORTH POND 3 1.60 1.49 3.09 0.00 2.32 4.31 NORTH POND 4 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.18 0.89 WEST PROPERTY 5 0.03 0.26 0.29 0.12 0.38 1.37 NORTHLAND ROW 6 0.04 0.05 0.09 0.16 0.29 0.66 NORTHLAND ROW TOTAL 5.79 2.52 8.31 0.32 4.67 16.33 GRADING 8c SOILS (BUILDING AND PAVEMENT EXCAVATIONS) (TYPES OF SOILS ON SITE) SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES: WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE BMP, THE SEDIMENT MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS. IF PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL HAS BEEN DAMAGED OR IS NOT FUNCTIONING PROPERLY, IT MUST BE REPAIRED AND/OR REPLACED WITHIN 24 HOURS. PERIMETER BMP MEASURES MAY INCLUDE SILT FENCING. CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS: ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT ONTO PAVED SURFACES MUST BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OR MORE FREQUENTLY IF REQUIRED BY CITY OR WATERSHED. CONSTRUCTION SITE DEWATERING: SITE WATER DISCHARGE DUE TO CONSTRUCTION DEWATERING OPERATIONS SHALL BE MONITORED FOR SEDIMENTATION AND TREATED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO PUBLIC STORM SEWERS. TREATMENT OF DEWATERING DISCHARGE MAY BE ACCOMPLISHED BY TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS OR OTHER APPROPRIATE BMPS. OTHER NOTES: 1. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE SITE WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE OWNER, XXXXX. INCLUDED MAINTENANCE FOR STORMWATER DEVISES SHALL BE: 1.1. INSPECT SUMP CATCH BASINS ON A BIANNUAL BASIS, ONCE IN THE SPRING AND ONCE IN THE FALL 1.2. CLEAN SUMP CATCH BASINS OF SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS ANNUALLY OR WHEN SEDIMENTS FILL OF THE STORAGE VOLUME. 1.3. ADDITIONAL LONG TERM MAINTENANCE 2. THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY BKBM ENGINEERS. A COPY OF THEIR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PROGRAM CERTIFICATION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 3. THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT MUST BE AMENDED AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION IN ORDER TO KEEP IT CURRENT WITH THE POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES UTILIZED AS THE SITE. THE SITE MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS OF ALL STORM WATER CONTROLS MUST BE POSTED ON THE SITE AND UPDATED TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION. FINAL STABILIZATION STABILIZATION BY UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER (70% DENSITY) DRAINAGE DITCHES STABILIZED. ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC AND STRUCTURAL BM P'S REMOVED. CLEAN OUT SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS (RETURN TO DESIGN CAPACITY). CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES PROVIDE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE WITHIN 200 FEET OF A SURFACE WATER, CURB AND GUTTER, CATCH BASIN, OR ANY STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM CONNECTED TO ANY OF THE ABOVE WITHIN THE FOLLOWING TIME FRAME: THE TIME AN AREA CAN REMAIN OPEN WHEN NOT ACTIVELY BEING WORKED ON: SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 - 7 DAYS SLOPES 10:1 TO 3:1 - 14 DAYS SLOPES FLATTER THAN 10:1 - 14 DAYS DITCHES THAT CONNECT TO A SURFACE WATER MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 200 -FEET FROM THE EDGE OF PROPERTY OR WITHIN 200 -FEET TO ANY SURFACE WATER WITHIN 24 -HOURS. PIPE OUTLETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 -HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UPGRADI ENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. OWNER: BRANDON CHAMPEAU, UNITED PROPERTIES, 3600 AMERICAN BLVD W, SUITE 750, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55431, (952)-837-8653 AGENCY CONTACTS CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1101 VICTORIA CURVE MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118 PHONE: (651) 452-1850 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 520 LAFAYETTE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55155 PHONE: (651) 296-6300 LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION 4100 220th STREET WEST FARMINGTON, MN PHONE: (651) 480-7778 NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLETE, SIGN, OBTAIN OWNERS SIGNATURE, PAY FEE, AND SEND IN THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES SOLID WASTE DISPOSED PROPERLY; COMPLY WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. HAZARDOUS WASTE STORED (SECONDARY CONTAINMENT, RESTRICTED ACCESS) AND DISPOSED IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. EXTERNAL WASHING OF TRUCKS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE CONTAINED AND WASTE PROPERLY DISPOSED. NO ENGINE DEGREASING ALLOWED ON-SITE. CONCRETE WASHOUT ON-SITE: ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS MUST BE CONTAINED IN A LEAK -PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER. A COMPACTED CLAY LINER THAT DOES NOT ALLOW LIQUIDS TO ENTER GROUND WATER IS CONSIDERED AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND, AND THERE MUST NOT BE RUNOFF FROM THE CONCRETE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REGULATIONS. A SIGN MUST BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO EACH WASHOUT FACILITY TO INFORM CONCRETE EQUIPMENT OPERATORS TO UTILIZE THE PROPER FACILITIES. THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA INDICATED ON THE PLANS IS SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE LOCATION. PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT INCLUDES THE CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS AND THE PROJECT MANUAL. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION PHASING NARRATIVE, ESTIMATED PRELIMINARY QUANTITIES OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S ANTICIPATED AT THE START OF THE PROJECT AND FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT, AND LOCATION OF AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL BE PHASED TO MINIMIZE DURATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS. CONTRACTOR IS TO REVIEW MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY'S INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE APPLICATION FOR MINNESOTA'S NPDES/SDS GENERAL STORMWATER PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PRIOR TO SUBMITTING APPLICATION. INSPECTIONS EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 1/2 INCH OVER 24 HOURS RAIN EVENT. STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS. FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. RECORDS: A COPY OF THE GRADING, DRAINAGE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND WATERSHED DATA & SWPPP PLANS AS WELL AS THE INSPECTIONS/MAINTENANCE LOGS ARE TO BE KEPT EITHER IN THE FIELD OFFICE, INSPECTOR'S VEHICLE OR CONTRACTOR'S VEHICLE. Page 109 BKBM ENGINEERS 5930 Brooklyn Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 • 2014 BKBM Professional Engineers. Inc. • All rights reserved. This document is an instrument of service and is the property of BKBM Professional Engineers, Inc. and may not be used or copied without prior written consent. ENGINEER CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM:JDULY LICENSED ENGINEER UND LAWS OF THE STiLE‘Cps, "AOTA. 0\‘4‘" ?SI NATURE TI-11y4DIESARE (-1\0\ PRINTril LICOSS PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 E IN • TA HE GHTS ce Lin Mendota Heights, MN Project Designer: KAB Drawn By: KAB Checked By: TJC Revisions 2/3/14 PRELIMINARY STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN Sheet Number Project No. 14197.00 MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK\MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK -L1 E v L PLANTING SCHEDULE QTY. KEY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE MTHD REMARKS 3 SO SWAMP WHITE OAK QUERCUS BICOLOR 2.5" BB 6 IH IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST GLEDITSIA TRICANTHOS 2.5" BB 13 AB AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER FREEMAN' 2.5" BB 25 BH BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA 6 FT BB 6 WP WHITE PINE PINUS STROBUS 6 FT BB 4 RB RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA 1.5" BB CLUMP TRUNK 8 RS RED SPLENDOR CRAB MALUSxHYBRIDS 'RED SPLENDOR' 1.5" BB 8 JB JAPANESE BARBERRY ROSY GLOW BERBERIS THUNBERGI 'ROSY GLOW' #5 CONT. 18 BB COMPACT BURNING BUSH EUONYMUS ALATUS 'COMPACTA' 5 CONT. 14 BJ BLUE CHIP JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HOR. BLUECHIP #5 CONT. 6 GD GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD CORNUS HESS( GARDEN GLOW #5 CONT. LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. SEED / SOD AREAS AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN. 2. PLANTINGS TO BE PLANTED IN ROCK MULCH PLANTING BED TO BE SEPARATED FROM SODDED AREAS BY BLACK VINYL EDGER. 3. UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL FOUNDATION PLANTINGS AND SODDED AREAS. PROVIDE MOISTURE SENSOR. LIGHTING NOTES: 1. LIGHTING SHOWN FOR SCHEMATIC PURPOSES ONLY. LIGHTING IS DESIGN–BUILD BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. VERIFY SIZE, STYLE, QUANTITY, AND LOCATION W/ OWNER AND CONTRACTOR. PROVIDE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRICS IF NECESSARY AT CITY'S REQUEST. 2. ALL LIGHTING IS TO BE SHIELDED/DIRECTED AWAY FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREET RIGHT OF WAYS. 3. PROVIDE EMERGENCY EXIT LIGHTING AT ALL EXIT DOORS. 4. MAXIMUM FOOT CANDLE READING AT PROPERTY LINE NOT TO EXCEED 0.2/FOOT CANDLES 04 vik I:llpj!IIOI � � 0_dI:4QI�dI!:AilQ�i!QI�j! —III— %moi! v Ne 111= -1 —III `��ii nlpp 111-1 ,01 II—III—I —L. 111 —111-1117 =11111111111111111 I SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE GROUND COVER OR MULCH AS SPEC. TURN BACK BURLAP REMOVE POLY AND WIRE SET BALL ON UNDISTURBED GROUND BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL -III=III=1 '1E1 I 11 I I 11111 IiI I 1=1 I II I I1—I I I11I I I Il1I I I Il1I I IMI I I—I I I - 3x ROOTBALL DIAMETER TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: NOT TO SCALE RETAIN TREES NATURAL FORM. REMOVE ONLY DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES DO NOT CUT LEADERS ROOT COLLAR 1-2" ABOVE GRADE WOOD CHIP MULCH REMOVE WIRE BASKETS AND POLY TIES. CUT BURLAB FROM UPPER 1 /2 OF BALL EXISTING GRADE BACKFILL WITH EXISTING SOIL. WATER THOROUGHLY TO ELIMINATE AIR POCKETS BREAK DOWN SIDES OF HOLE UNDISTURBED SOIL BENEATH BALL 11 • 8"MPL NORTH 1 1 LANDSCAPE, SITE LIGHTING PLAN 40 �1} SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" G G ND DRIVE S 89°51'46" W 585.9711 COT 2-11 "COT 1 4"COT d WRICAVIAMILFWglaVrAMl .w '+' 2-g"CoT 2-7"COT 17"C04 _/w 2-15"COT 8 COT 3-16"COT 1 4"CO 1 5"COT POND SEED POND AREA G TO CIVIL SPEC G I IIIIII'L 0 XX XX / O O - — — — J — — J — _� — — XX SOD G SOD S 86°50'02" E 371.53' (MEAS) 371.58' (PLAT) — — — — — — J — — J — — I — — I X"ELM 18"COT "CuT g"COT EXISTING TREE TO 2.16"COT 9"COT 3.16"COT 3.16"COT 5"COT 5"COT 'COT PROPOSED BUILDING 0 5"COT ®TR ®- 3"TR X--3"TR 3-6"TR 11 "COT BE REMOVED 0 'TR 250W HPS FIXTURE WITH DOWNCAST SHIELD MOUNTED TO BUILDING AT 20 FT A.F.F. (13 THUS) LIGHT THROW INDICATES APPROX. .5 FT CANDLES i / 0 G- 1- z W / 1 / INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 494 G SOD 1 11"C J 1 ROCK MULCH BED ROCK MULCH BED -�J ROCK MULCH BED PERRENIAL ARDEN SELECTIONS BY OWNER / ROCK / MULCH BED / 250W HPS FIX URE WITH DOWNCAST SHIELD MOUNTED Ts Ai FT PO E (4 THUS) LIGHT APPROX. .5 FT CANDLES ROCK MULCH BED APPROXIMATE GAS LINE LOCATION VERIFY EASEMENT LOCATION AND GRADING LIMITATIONS G G G SOD S 82°32'19" E • 215.25' (MEAS) 215.18' (PLAT) • 3-6"COT t D 0 3"SPCG 3"SPCC 1 5"COT 2"CRAB O EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN 1 • (2) 250W HPS FIXTURE— WITH DOWNCAST SHIELD MOUNTED TO 20 FT POLE (4 THUS) LIGHT THROW INDICATES APPROX. .5 FT CANDLES G G J 3"SPCG 2"CRAB 2"OAK (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 CA W CAZ m Mendota Heights, MN Drawn By: JRB Checked By: LL Revisions 1 /21 /14 PRELIMINARY 1 /31 /14 CITY SUBMITTAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SITE LIGHTING PLAN Sheet Number Project No. 131211-1 MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK\MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK -A1 E 0 E SITE DATA LOT SIZE - 362,004 S.F. = 8.31 ACRES ZONING - I, INDUSTRIAL BUILDING 96,984 S.F. OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDING COVERAGE - 96,984/362,004 S.F. = 26.8% < 50% GREEN SPACE - 110,871/362,004 = 30.6% > 25% PARKING ISLANDS - 3,611/67,565 = 5.3% > 5% PARKING DATA OFFICE - 30% 29,095 S.F. AT 1/200 = 145 STALLS WAREHOUSE - 70% 67,889 S.F. AT 1/2000 = 34 STALLS 1 179 STALLS REQUIRED 186 STALLS PROVIDED 53 PROOF STALLS SITE PLAN 237 ULTIMATE STALLS SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" NORTH 1► j f' • 1 20'-0 16 H 0 Q • O= cnC1- Z w� O O J Z Q aw w _ mow'- • Z O DwI- 30'-0" ORTHLAND DRIVE S 89a585197'4" W RETAINING WALL SEE CIVIL PLAN 0 co RETAINING WALL SEE CIVIL PLAN SLOPE BITUMINOUS 140'-0" DRIy-IN _Jw U 0 — 7o — � 200'-0" 0 7 ENTRY u 23 4 1 -16 jNTRY V 10'-0" 0 O O c C.7 Y Zo _ Q 0_' m Q w 0_ VI DEVELOPMENT SIGNAGE SEE DETAIL 5/A3 I 12 22 0 22 11 30'-0" 20'-0" 24'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 24'-0" 20'-0" 10,-0" PARKIN SE TB C t'J Q a LLJ J CO P i- oo • o(0(0 o co 25 TRAILERS TRASH ENCLOSURE SUGGESTED — 7o TRANSFORMER NI LOCATION 1- 170'-0" CONCRETE DOLLY PAD SLOPE BITUMINOUS G f 0 ICC I XX MECH ROOM XX — J — J v7 - moo — 7 XX 80'-0" O O 0 0 PRPOSED BUIL 96,984 S.F. DING CV •LJ 1 J ENTRY 1 23 .UJ ENTRY G S 86°50'02" E 371.53' (MEAS) 371.58' (PLAT) 1- z 0 O Z I Q pm - Ln CO cn G o Y Z ¢O¢ I Y d3 CVO • 0_ Vl INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO. 494 APPROXIMATE GAS LINE LOCATION VERIFY EASEMENT LOCATION AND GRADING LIMITATIONS G G G 0 ) 22 11 24 t 1 G S 82°32'19" E • 215.25' (MEAS) 215.18' (PLAT) • 0 16 c G 3O' -C/" BUILDII'JIG SETB1K 10'-0" PARKING SETBACKI 0 O 0 0 z LAMPERT ARCHITECTS 420 Summit Avenue •�° St. Paul, MN 55102 IUI Phone:763.755.1211 Fax:763.757.2849 IampertOlampert-arch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UND/1I6 E LAWS OF THE SCNE OTA. OATURV‘I*1‘"QSE O� LEO PERT OC, PRINT\'""" �`O 13669 LICE �1 CrrE (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 Mendota Heights, MN Copyright 2014 Leonard Lampert Architects, P.A. Project Designer: JAMES B Drawn By: JRB Checked By: LL Revisions 1/21/14 PRELIMINARY 1/31/14 CITY SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN Sheet Number Project No. 131211-1 © w z D m 1— w 2 0 0 z w 0 w CO z N 1— w 0 0 z w E v c a) i� 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 L___J 1 } L__J L__J LAJ II II 1 A 1 1 A 1 I 1V"1 -1'v"1 -1'y" I LAJLAJLAJ L__J L__J L__J L__J L__J of 40'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0" . - . - . - . - RISER PHONE 0 w U w MECHANICAL ROOM oll 40'-0" Iq 40'-0" K.O. K.O. K.O. 1 40'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0" 40'-0" LAMPERT ARCHITECTS 420 Summit Avenue •�• St. Paul, MN 55102 IUI Phone:763.755.1211 Fox:763.757.2849 lampert@lampert—orch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMDULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UND E LAWS OF THE S;ATB, N E OTA. OtV\E Ok tTUR PRIA 613066901 P�r`LE � O 40'-0" 480 —0" O © © O FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" O W'5 O 10 12 (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 Mendota Heights, MN Copyright 2014 Leonard Lampert Architects, P.A. Project Designer: JAMES B Drown By: JRB Checked By: LL Revisions 1/21/14 PRELIMINARY 1/31/14 CITY SUBMITTAL FLOOR PLAN Sheet Number Project No. 131211-1 POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS SIZE NOT TO EXCEED 100 S.F. PER TENANT NUMBER OF SIGNS AND LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED PER TENANT PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING COLOR #7 BRICK VENEER COLOR #3 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK FACE BLOCK COLOR #4 REVERSED PRECAST PANEL FOR FLAT FINISH WITH RECESSED BANDING L • l I__L J ■ ■ 11111111 TOP OF MASONRY EL. = 138'-8" ALTOP OF PRECAST EL. = 137-0" AFINISHED FLOOR EL. = 100'-0" J EAST ELEVATION A3 % SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY COLOR #5 ANODIZED ALUMINUM FRAMES COLOR #6 TINTED GLASS NORTH ELEVATION A3 J SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" PAINTED PRECAST PANEL COLOR #1 PAINTED PRECAST PANEL ACCENT COLOR #2 MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK\MENDOTA HEIGHTS BUSINESS PARK -A3 E v c L r L 01 ID 01 ID 4 TOP OF MASONRY EL. = 138'-8" 4 TOP OF PRECAST EL. = 137'-0" FINISHED FLOOR EL. = 100'-0" oI ID DI ID i 01 ID WEST ELEVATION 01 ID 01 01 ID A3 J SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 01 ID 0 01 ID DI lo 0 i i ▪ anal GRADING ABOVE FIRST FLOOR VERIFY WITH GRADING PLAN SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 01 ID 0 01 ID 01 BRICK VENEER COLOR #3 lo 0 INTEGRAL COLOR ROCK FACE BLOCK COLOR #4 0 PREFINISHED METAL FLASHING COLOR #7 REVERSED PRECAST PANE FOR FLAT FINISH WITH RECESSED BANDING PAINTED PRECAST PANEL COLOR #1 A3 H 2'-8"x2'-8" 1 BRICK PILASTER 1 L L_ I MONUMENT SIGN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" (5) POTENTIAL SIGNAGE LOCATIONS ALUMINUM DIVIDER BY SIGN SUPPLIER ADDRESS NUMBERS PAINTED PRECAST PANEL ACCENT COLOR #2 SIGNAGE IS TWO—SIDED PROVIDE POWER TO SIGN FOR LIGHTING TOTAL SIGN AREA PER SIDE = 89 S.F. (100 S.F. MAX) LAMPERT ARCHITECTS 420 Summit Avenue •�• St. Paul, MN 55102 IUI Phone:763.755.1211 Fox:763.757.2849 lampert@lampert—arch.com ARCHITECT CERTIFICATION: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMDULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UND E LAWS OF THE S;ATBI E OTA. QSI AE Ok 11 7,613; PET PIN(T�1" "" r ` `O 13669 �v� LI (CE 5� TE (UNITED PROPERTIES 3600 American Blvd. W. Suite 750 Bloomington, MN 55431 952-835-5300 Mendota Heights, MN Copyright 2014 Leonard Lampert Architects, P.A. Project Designer: JAMES B Drown By: JRB Checked By: LL Revisions 1/21/14 PRELIMINARY 1/31/14 CITY SUBMITTAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS Sheet Number Project No. 131211-1 Page 114 Xcel Energy NORTHERN STATES POWER 825 Rice Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55117 January 31, 2014 Mr. Thomas J. Cesare, P.E. BKBM Engineers 5930 Brooklyn Blvd Minneapolis, MN 55429-2518 Re: Proposed Parking Lot Encroachment on Gas Pipeline Easement 26" TL0203 Cedar Line Interstate 494, East of Pilot Knob Road, Mendota Heights S34, T28N, R23W Dear Mr. Cesare: I have reviewed the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan for the proposed site in the Mendota Heights Business Park. Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy ("Xcel Energy") owns and operates a 26" diameter gas pipeline in an easement adjacent to Interstate 494. Xcel Energy will allow the encroachment into the gas pipeline easement for a parking lot under the following conditions: a) Only parking lot surfaces and curb and gutter are permitted within the easement as shown on the Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan. b) No buildings, permanent structures, manholes, catch basins, fire hydrants, light poles, trees, or shrubs are permitted within the easement. c) Prior to any excavation, call Gopher State One -Call (651-454-0002) to have the pipeline located. d) No change in grade is permitted directly above 26" gas pipeline in the location where it is marked through the Gopher State On -Call process. e) Xcel Energy shall have reasonable access to said easement across the owner's property and shall have the right to enter upon said easement at any time, and from time to time for the purposes of future construction, reconstruction, inspection, maintenance, or repair ("maintenance") of said gas facilities. f) The cost to repair any damage to the parking lot caused by Xcel Energy's maintenance of said pipeline will be the responsibility of the property owner. Sincerely, Nick J. Boosalis, P.E. Senior Engineer c: easement file XPR1 \\FNPCPRS01\Home\BSLN01\TransEng\Encroachments\TL0203_MenHtsBusPark_BKBM.doc Page 115 of Affidavit Publication State of Minneso � -8S Dakota Conutycf8 ANNE THILLEN being duly sworn, on oath, says that he/she is the publisher or authorized agent and employee of the publisher of the newspaper known as SOUTH-WEST REVIEW , and has full knowledge of the facts which are stated below: (A) 'The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amende. "^'^^°E HEARING (B) The printedP which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for 1 successive weeks; it was first published on SUNDAY , the 9TH day of FEBRUARY , 2014 , and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including . the day of . 20 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z. both inc|ueive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: Subscribed and sworn to before me on t .s 10TH day of FEBRUARY 4 BY: TITLE LEGAL COORDINATOR =, � Notary Public � *Alphabet should be in the same size and kind of type as the notice. °^^,VVIv TONYA R. WHITEHEAD! �'��_�_��_� Notary RATE INFORMATION wvCommi:sionsxpirs Jan m.20mg (1) Lowest classifled rate paid by commercial users for comparable space $25.00 per col. inch (2) Maximum rate aHowed by Iaw for the above matter $25.00 per col. inch (3) Rate actuaUy charged for the above matter per col. inch 1/14 Page 116 CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS NOTICE OF HEARING A PUBLIC HEARING ON A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AMEND A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given that the Plahning Commission of Mendota Heights will meet at 7:00 P.M., or as soon as possible thereafter, on Tuesday, February 25,'2014 in the City Hall: Council Chambers, 1101 Victoria Curve, Mendota Heights, Minnesota, ` to consider ' an application from United Properties for a conditional use permit to amend a planned unit development on the lots identified as ; NORTHLAND DRIVE ADDITION, LOT -2 BLK 1 EX PT IN SEC 3-27-23 (PID# 27-52220- 01-020) &'- MENDOTA -TECHNOLOGY CENTER 2ND ADDITION, OUTLOT A`(PID# 27- 48446-00-010). This request has been assigned' Planning Case number 2014-06. This notice is pursuant to Title.12 (Zoning), Chapter 1 of the Mendota Heights City Code. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to this request will be heard at this meeting. Lorri:Smith` City. Clerk.' (South-West Review: Feb. 9, 2014) Page 117 Planning Case 2014-06 - Public Hearing Notice Mailing List 274825101020 O 1345 NORTHLAND DR 1345 MENDOTA HEIGHTS RD LLC 274830004090 MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS LLC 274830006021 274830004100 1352 NORTHLAND DR 0 1295 NORTHLAND DR C2 LAND LP MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS LLC 275222001010 ©1330 NORTHLAND DR 274844600010 HERITAGE INN OF MENDOTA 0NORTHLAND LAND CO HEIGHTS 275222001011 HERITAGE INN OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS 275222001020 NORTHLAND LAND CO 274844601010 275222001021 O 1270 NORTHLAND DR NORTHLAND LAND CO MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS LLC 274830004080 274825101010 O 1285 NORTHLAND DR ea 1333 NORTHLAND DR MENDOTA OFFICE HOLDINGS LLC P5 UNLIMITED LLC Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. This is not a Map Scale legal document and should not be substituted for a title search,appraisal, survey, or for zoning 1 inch = 306 feet verification. Dakota County assumes no fecal resoonsibility for the information contained in this data. _ .. _ . .